Develop an Availability and Capacity Management Plan

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}500|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 8.0/10 Overall Impact
  • member rating average dollars saved: $2,840 Average $ Saved
  • member rating average days saved: 10 Average Days Saved
  • Parent Category Name: Availability & Capacity Management
  • Parent Category Link: /availability-and-capacity-management
  • It is crucial for capacity managers to provide capacity in advance of need to maximize availability.
  • In an effort to ensure maximum uptime, organizations are overprovisioning (an average of 59% for compute, and 48% for storage). With budget pressure mounting (especially on the capital side), the cost of this approach can’t be ignored.
  • Half of organizations have experienced capacity-related downtime, and almost 60% wait more than three months for additional capacity.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • All too often capacity management is left as an afterthought. The best capacity managers bake capacity management into their organization’s business processes, becoming drivers of value.
  • Communication is key. Build bridges between your organization’s silos, and involve business stakeholders in a dialog about capacity requirements.

Impact and Result

  • Map business metrics to infrastructure component usage, and use your organization’s own data to forecast demand.
  • Project future needs in line with your hardware lifecycle. Never suffer availability issues as a result of a lack of capacity again.
  • Establish infrastructure as a driver of business value, not a “black hole” cost center.

Develop an Availability and Capacity Management Plan Research & Tools

Start here – read the Executive Brief

Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should build a capacity management plan, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

  • Develop an Availability and Capacity Management Plan – Phases 1-4

1. Conduct a business impact analysis

Determine the most critical business services to ensure availability.

  • Develop an Availability and Capacity Management Plan – Phase 1: Conduct a Business Impact Analysis
  • Business Impact Analysis Tool

2. Establish visibility into core systems

Craft a monitoring strategy to gather usage data.

  • Develop an Availability and Capacity Management Plan – Phase 2: Establish Visibility into Core Systems
  • Capacity Snapshot Tool

3. Solicit and incorporate business needs

Integrate business stakeholders into the capacity management process.

  • Develop an Availability and Capacity Management Plan – Phase 3: Solicit and Incorporate Business Needs
  • Capacity Plan Template

4. Identify and mitigate risks

Identify and mitigate risks to your capacity and availability.

  • Develop an Availability and Capacity Management Plan – Phase 4: Identify and Mitigate Risks

[infographic]

Workshop: Develop an Availability and Capacity Management Plan

Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

1 Conduct a Business Impact Analysis

The Purpose

Determine the most important IT services for the business.

Key Benefits Achieved

Understand which services to prioritize for ensuring availability.

Activities

1.1 Create a scale to measure different levels of impact.

1.2 Evaluate each service by its potential impact.

1.3 Assign a criticality rating based on the costs of downtime.

Outputs

RTOs/RPOs

List of gold systems

Criticality matrix

2 Establish Visibility Into Core Systems

The Purpose

Monitor and measure usage metrics of key systems.

Key Benefits Achieved

Capture and correlate data on business activity with infrastructure capacity usage.

Activities

2.1 Define your monitoring strategy.

2.2 Implement your monitoring tool/aggregator.

Outputs

RACI chart

Capacity/availability monitoring strategy

3 Develop a Plan to Project Future Needs

The Purpose

Determine how to project future capacity usage needs for your organization.

Key Benefits Achieved

Data-based, systematic projection of future capacity usage needs.

Activities

3.1 Analyze historical usage trends.

3.2 Interface with the business to determine needs.

3.3 Develop a plan to combine these two sources of truth.

Outputs

Plan for soliciting future needs

Future needs

4 Identify and Mitigate Risks

The Purpose

Identify potential risks to capacity and availability.

Develop strategies to ameliorate potential risks.

Key Benefits Achieved

Proactive approach to capacity that addresses potential risks before they impact availability.

Activities

4.1 Identify capacity and availability risks.

4.2 Determine strategies to address risks.

4.3 Populate and review completed capacity plan.

Outputs

List of risks

List of strategies to address risks

Completed capacity plan

Further reading

Develop an Availability and Capacity Management Plan

Manage capacity to increase uptime and reduce costs.

ANALYST PERSPECTIVE

The cloud changes the capacity manager’s job, but it doesn’t eliminate it.

"Nobody doubts the cloud’s transformative power. But will its ascent render “capacity manager” an archaic term to be carved into the walls of datacenters everywhere for future archaeologists to puzzle over? No. While it is true that the cloud has fundamentally changed how capacity managers do their jobs , the process is more important than ever. Managing capacity – and, by extent, availability – means minimizing costs while maximizing uptime. The cloud era is the era of unlimited capacity – and of infinite potential costs. If you put the infinity symbol on a purchase order… well, it’s probably not a good idea. Manage demand. Manage your capacity. Manage your availability. And, most importantly, keep your stakeholders happy. You won’t regret it."

Jeremy Roberts,

Consulting Analyst, Infrastructure Practice

Info-Tech Research Group

Availability and capacity management transcend IT

This Research Is Designed For:

✓ CIOs who want to increase uptime and reduce costs

✓ Infrastructure managers who want to deliver increased value to the business

✓ Enterprise architects who want to ensure stability of core IT services

✓ Dedicated capacity managers

This Research Will Help You:

✓ Develop a list of core services

✓ Establish visibility into your system

✓ Solicit business needs

✓ Project future demand

✓ Set SLAs

✓ Increase uptime

✓ Optimize spend

This Research Will Also Assist:

✓ Project managers

✓ Service desk staff

This Research Will Help Them:

✓ Plan IT projects

✓ Better manage availability incidents caused by lack of capacity

Executive summary

Situation

  • IT infrastructure leaders are responsible for ensuring that the business has access to the technology needed to keep the organization humming along. This requires managing capacity and availability.
  • Dependencies go undocumented. Services are provided on an ad hoc basis, and capacity/availability are managed reactively.

Complication

  • Organizations are overprovisioning an average of 59% for compute, and 48% for storage. This is expensive. With budget pressure mounting, the cost of this approach can’t be ignored.
  • Lead time to respond to demand is long. Half of organizations have experienced capacity-related downtime, and almost 60% wait 3+ months for additional capacity. (451 Research, 3)

Resolution

  • Conduct a business impact analysis to determine which of your services are most critical, and require active capacity management that will reap more in benefits than it produces in costs.
  • Establish visibility into your system. You can’t track what you can’t see, and you can’t see when you don’t have proper monitoring tools in place.
  • Develop an understanding of business needs. Use a combination of historical trend analyses and consultation with line of business and project managers to separate wants from needs. Overprovisioning used to be necessary, but is no longer required.
  • Project future needs in line with your hardware lifecycle. Never suffer availability issues as a result of a lack of capacity again.

Info-Tech Insight

  1. Components are critical. The business doesn’t care about components. You, however, are not so lucky…
  2. Ask what the business is working on, not what they need. If you ask them what they need, they’ll tell you – and it won’t be cheap. Find out what they’re going to do, and use your expertise to service those needs.
  3. Cloud shmoud. The role of the capacity manager is changing with the cloud, but capacity management is as important as ever.

Save money and drive efficiency with an effective availability and capacity management plan

Overprovisioning happens because of the old style of infrastructure provisioning (hardware refresh cycles) and because capacity managers don’t know how much they need (either as a result of inaccurate or nonexistent information).

According to 451 Research, 59% of enterprises have had to wait 3+ months for new capacity. It is little wonder, then, that so many opt to overprovision. Capacity management is about ensuring that IT services are available, and with lead times like that, overprovisioning can be more attractive than the alternative. Fortunately there is hope. An effective availability and capacity management plan can help you:

  • Identify your gold systems
  • Establish visibility into them
  • Project your future capacity needs

Balancing overprovisioning and spending is the capacity manager’s struggle.

Availability and capacity management go together like boots and feet

Availability and capacity are not the same, but they are related and can be effectively managed together as part of a single process.

If an IT department is unable to meet demand due to insufficient capacity, users will experience downtime or a degradation in service. To be clear, capacity is not the only factor in availability – reliability, serviceability, etc. are significant as well. But no organization can effectively manage availability without paying sufficient attention to capacity.

"Availability Management is concerned with the design, implementation, measurement and management of IT services to ensure that the stated business requirements for availability are consistently met."

– OGC, Best Practice for Service Delivery, 12

"Capacity management aims to balance supply and demand [of IT storage and computing services] cost-effectively…"

– OGC, Business Perspective, 90

Integrate the three levels of capacity management

Successful capacity management involves a holistic approach that incorporates all three levels.

Business The highest level of capacity management, business capacity management, involves predicting changes in the business’ needs and developing requirements in order to make it possible for IT to adapt to those needs. Influx of new clients from a failed competitor.
Service Service capacity management focuses on ensuring that IT services are monitored to determine if they are meeting pre-determined SLAs. The data gathered here can be used for incident and problem management. Increased website traffic.
Component Component capacity management involves tracking the functionality of specific components (servers, hard drives, etc.), and effectively tracking their utilization and performance, and making predictions about future concerns. Insufficient web server compute.

The C-suite cares about business capacity as part of the organization’s strategic planning. Service leads care about their assigned services. IT infrastructure is concerned with components, but not for their own sake. Components mean services that are ultimately designed to facilitate business.

A healthcare organization practiced poor capacity management and suffered availability issues as a result

CASE STUDY

Industry: Healthcare

Source: Interview

New functionalities require new infrastructure

There was a project to implement an elastic search feature. This had to correlate all the organization’s member data from an Oracle data source and their own data warehouse, and pool them all into an elastic search index so that it could be used by the provider portal search function. In estimating the amount of space needed, the infrastructure team assumed that all the data would be shared in a single place. They didn’t account for the architecture of elastic search in which indexes are shared across multiple nodes and shards are often split up separately.

Beware underestimating demand and hardware sourcing lead times

As a result, they vastly underestimated the amount of space that was needed and ended up short by a terabyte. The infrastructure team frantically sourced more hardware, but the rush hardware order arrived physically damaged and had to be returned to the vendor.

Sufficient budget won’t ensure success without capacity planning

The project’s budget had been more than sufficient to pay for the extra necessary capacity, but because a lack of understanding of the infrastructure impact resulted in improper forecasting, the project ended up stuck in a standstill.

Manage availability and keep your stakeholders happy

If you run out of capacity, you will inevitably encounter availability issues like downtime and performance degradation . End users do not like downtime, and neither do their managers.

There are three variables that are monitored, measured, and analyzed as part of availability management more generally (Valentic).

    1. Uptime:

The availability of a system is the percentage of time the system is “up,” (and not degraded) which can be calculated using the following formula: uptime/(uptime + downtime) x 100%. The more components there are in a system, the lower the availability, as a rule.

    1. Reliability:

The length of time a component/service can go before there is an outage that brings it down, typically measured in hours.

    1. Maintainability:

The amount of time it takes for a component/service to be restored in the event of an outage, also typically measured in hours.

Enter the cloud: changes in the capacity manager role

There can be no doubt – the rise of the public cloud has fundamentally changed the nature of capacity management.

Features of the public cloudImplications for capacity management
Instant, or near-instant, instantiation Lead times drop; capacity management is less about ensuring equipment arrives on time.
Pay-as-you go services Capacity no longer needs to be purchased in bulk. Pay only for what you use and shut down instances that are no longer necessary.
Essentially unlimited scalability Potential capacity is infinite, but so are potential costs.
Offsite hosting Redundancy, but at the price of the increasing importance of your internet connection.

Vendors will sell you the cloud as a solution to your capacity/availability problems

The image contains two graphs. The first graph on the left is titled: Reactive Management, and shows the struggling relationship between capacity and demand. The second graph on the right is titled: Cloud future (ideal), which demonstrates a manageable relationship between capacity and demand over time.

Traditionally, increases in capacity have come in bursts as a reaction to availability issues. This model inevitably results in overprovisioning, driving up costs. Access to the cloud changes the equation. On-demand capacity means that, ideally, nobody should pay for unused capacity.

Reality check: even in the cloud era, capacity management is necessary

You will likely find vendors to nurture the growth of a gap between your expectations and reality. That can be damaging.

The cloud reality does not look like the cloud ideal. Even with the ostensibly elastic cloud, vendors like the consistency that longer-term contracts offer. Enter reserved instances: in exchange for lower hourly rates, vendors offer the option to pay a fee for a reserved instance. Usage beyond the reserved will be billed at a higher hourly rate. In order to determine where that line should be drawn, you should engage in detailed capacity planning. Unfortunately, even when done right, this process will result in some overprovisioning, though it does provide convenience from an accounting perspective. The key is to use spot instances where demand is exceptional and bounded. Example: A university registration server that experiences exceptional demand at the start of term but at no other time.

The image contains an example of cloud reality not matching with the cloud ideal in the form of a graph. The graph is split horizontally, the top half is red, and there is a dotted line splitting it from the lower half. The line is labelled: Reserved instance ceiling. In the bottom half, it is the colour green and has a curving line.

Use best practices to optimize your cloud resources

The image contains two graphs. The graph on the left is labelled: Ineffective reserve capacity. At the top of the graph is a dotted line labelled: Reserved Instance ceiling. The graph is measuring capacity requirements over time. There is a curved line on the graph that suddenly spikes and comes back down. The spike is labelled unused capacity. The graph on the right is labelled: Effective reserve capacity. The reserved instance ceiling is about halfway down this graph, and it is comparing capacity requirements over time. This graph has a curved line on it, also has a spike and is labelled: spot instance.

Even in the era of elasticity, capacity planning is crucial. Spot instances – the spikes in the graph above – are more expensive, but if your capacity needs vary substantially, reserving instances for all of the space you need can cost even more money. Efficiently planning capacity will help you draw this line.

Evaluate business impact; not all systems are created equal

Limited resources are a reality. Detailed visibility into every single system is often not feasible and could be too much information.

Simple and effective. Sometimes a simple display can convey all of the information necessary to manage critical systems. In cars it is important to know your speed, how much fuel is in the tank, and whether or not you need to change your oil/check your engine.

Where to begin?! Specialized information is sometimes necessary, but it can be difficult to navigate.

Take advantage of a business impact analysis to define and understand your critical services

Ideally, downtime would be minimal. In reality, though, downtime is a part of IT life. It is important to have realistic expectations about its nature and likelihood.

STEP 1

STEP 2

STEP 3

STEP 4

STEP 5

Record applications and dependencies

Utilize your asset management records and document the applications and systems that IT is responsible for managing and recovering during a disaster.

Define impact scoring scale

Ensure an objective analysis of application criticality by establishing a business impact scale that applies to all applications.

Estimate impact of downtime

Leverage the scoring criteria from the previous step and establish an estimated impact of downtime for each application.

Identify desired RTO and RPO

Define what the RTOs/RPOs should be based on the impact of a business interruption and the tolerance for downtime and data loss.

Determine current RTO/RPO

Conduct tabletop planning and create a flowchart of your current capabilities. Compare your current state to the desired state from the previous step.

Info-Tech Insight

According to end users, every system is critical and downtime is intolerable. Of course, once they see how much totally eliminating downtime can cost, they might change their tune. It is important to have this discussion to separate the critical from the less critical – but still important – services.

Establish visibility into critical systems

You may have seen “If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it” or a variation thereof floating around the internet. This adage is consumable and makes sense…doesn’t it?

"It is wrong to suppose that if you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it – a costly myth."

– W. Edwards Deming, statistician and management consultant, author of The New Economics

While it is true that total monitoring is not absolutely necessary for management, when it comes to availability and capacity – objectively quantifiable service characteristics – a monitoring strategy is unavoidable. Capturing fluctuations in demand, and adjusting for those fluctuations, is among the most important functions of a capacity manager, even if hovering over employees with a stopwatch is poor management.

Solicit needs from line of business managers

Unless you head the world’s most involved IT department (kudos if you do) you’re going to have to determine your needs from the business.

Do

Do not

✓ Develop a positive relationship with business leaders responsible for making decisions.

✓ Make yourself aware of ongoing and upcoming projects.

✓ Develop expertise in organization-specific technology.

✓ Make the business aware of your expenses through chargebacks or showbacks.

✓ Use your understanding of business projects to predict business needs; do not rely on business leaders’ technical requests alone.

X Be reactive.

X Accept capacity/availability demands uncritically.

X Ask line of business managers for specific computing requirements unless they have the technical expertise to make informed judgments.

X Treat IT as an opaque entity where requests go in and services come out (this can lead to irresponsible requests).

Demand: manage or be managed

You might think you can get away with uncritically accepting your users’ demands, but this is not best practice. If you provide it, they will use it.

The company meeting

“I don’t need this much RAM,” the application developer said, implausibly. Titters wafted above the assembled crowd as her IT colleagues muttered their surprise. Heads shook, eyes widened. In fact, as she sat pondering her utterance, the developer wasn’t so sure she believed it herself. Noticing her consternation, the infrastructure manager cut in and offered the RAM anyway, forestalling the inevitable crisis that occurs when seismic internal shifts rock fragile self-conceptions. Until next time, he thought.

"Work expands as to fill the resources available for its completion…"

– C. Northcote Parkinson, quoted in Klimek et al.

Combine historical data with the needs you’ve solicited to holistically project your future needs

Predicting the future is difficult, but when it comes to capacity management, foresight is necessary.

Critical inputs

In order to project your future needs, the following inputs are necessary.

  1. Usage trends: While it is true that past performance is no indication of future demand, trends are still a good way to validate requests from the business.
  2. Line of business requests: An understanding of the projects the business has in the pipes is important for projecting future demand.
  3. Institutional knowledge: Read between the lines. As experts on information technology, the IT department is well-equipped to translate needs into requirements.
The image contains a graph that is labelled: Projected demand, and graphs demand over time. There is a curved line that passes through a vertical line labelled present. There is a box on top of the graph that contains the text: Note: confidence in demand estimates will very by service and by stakeholder.

Follow best practice guidelines to maximize the efficiency of your availability and capacity management process

The image contains Info-Tech's IT Management & Governance Framework. The framework displays many of Info-Tech's research to help optimize and improve core IT processes. The name of this blueprint is under the Infrastructure & Operations section, and has been circled to point out where it is in the framework.

Understand how the key frameworks relate and interact

The image contains a picture of the COBIT 5 logo.

BA104: Manage availability and capacity

  • Current state assessment
  • Forecasting based on business requirements
  • Risk assessment of planning and implementation of requirements
The image contains a picture of the ITIL logo

Availability management

  • Determine business requirements
  • Match requirements to capabilities
  • Address any mismatch between requirements and capabilities in a cost-effective manner

Capacity management

  • Monitoring services and components
  • Tuning for efficiency
  • Forecasting future requirements
  • Influencing demand
  • Producing a capacity plan
The image contains a picture of Info-Tech Research Group logo.

Availability and capacity management

  • Conduct a business impact analysis
  • Establish visibility into critical systems
  • Solicit and incorporate business needs
  • Identify and mitigate risks

Disaster recovery and business continuity planning are forms of availability management

The scope of this project is managing day-to-day availability, largely but not exclusively, in the context of capacity. For additional important information on availability, see the following Info-Tech projects.

    • Develop a Business Continuity Plan

If your focus is on ensuring process continuity in the event of a disaster.

    • Establish a Program to Enable Effective Performance Monitoring

If your focus is on flow mapping and transaction monitoring as part of a plan to engage APM vendors.

    • Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan

If your focus is on hardening your IT systems against major events.

Info-Tech’s approach to availability and capacity management is stakeholder-centered and cloud ready

Phase 1:

Conduct a business impact analysis

Phase 2:

Establish visibility into core systems

Phase 3:

Solicit and incorporate business needs

Phase 4:

Identify and mitigate risks

1.1 Conduct a business impact analysis

1.2 Assign criticality ratings to services

2.1 Define your monitoring strategy

2.2 Implement monitoring tool/aggregator

3.1 Solicit business needs

3.2 Analyze data and project future needs

4.1 Identify and mitigate risks

Deliverables

  • Business impact analysis
  • Gold systems
  • Monitoring strategy
  • List of stakeholders
  • Business needs
  • Projected capacity needs
  • Risks and mitigations
  • Capacity management summary cards

Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

DIY Toolkit

“Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

Guided Implementation

“Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

Workshop

“We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

Consulting

“Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

Availability & capacity management – project overview

 

Conduct a business impact analysis

Establish visibility into core systems

Solicit and incorporate business needs

Identify and
mitigate risks

Best-Practice Toolkit

1.1 Create a scale to measure different levels of impact

1.2 Assign criticality ratings to services

2.1 Define your monitoring strategy

2.2 Implement your monitoring tool/aggregator

3.1 Solicit business needs and gather data

3.2 Analyze data and project future needs

4.1 Identify and mitigate risks

Guided Implementations

Call 1: Conduct a business impact analysis Call 1: Discuss your monitoring strategy

Call 1: Develop a plan to gather historical data; set up plan to solicit business needs

Call 2: Evaluate data sources

Call 1: Discuss possible risks and strategies for risk mitigation

Call 2: Review your capacity management plan

Onsite Workshop

Module 1:

Conduct a business impact analysis

Module 2:

Establish visibility into core systems

Module 3:

Develop a plan to project future needs

Module 4:

Identify and mitigate risks

 

Phase 1 Results:

  • RTOs/RPOs
  • List of gold systems
  • Criticality matrix

Phase 2 Results:

  • Capacity/availability monitoring strategy

Phase 3 Results:

  • Plan for soliciting future needs
  • Future needs

Phase 4 Results:

  • Strategies for reducing risks
  • Capacity management plan

Workshop overview

Contact your account representative or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

 

Workshop Day 1

Workshop Day 2

Workshop Day 3

Workshop Day 4

 

Conduct a business
impact analysis

Establish visibility into
core systems

Solicit and incorporate business needs

Identify and mitigate risks

Activities

1.1 Conduct a business impact analysis

1.2 Create a list of critical dependencies

1.3 Identify critical sub-components

1.4 Develop best practices to negotiate SLAs

2.1 Determine indicators for sub-components

2.2 Establish visibility into components

2.3 Develop strategies to ameliorate visibility issues

3.1 Gather relevant business-level data

3.2 Gather relevant service-level data

3.3 Analyze historical trends

3.4 Build a list of business stakeholders

3.5 Directly solicit requirements from the business

3.6 Map business needs to technical requirements

3.7 Identify inefficiencies and compare historical data

  • 4.1 Brainstorm potential causes of availability and capacity risk
  • 4.2 Identify and mitigate capacity risks
  • 4.3 Identify and mitigate availability risks

Deliverables

  1. Business impact analysis
  2. List of gold systems
  3. SLA best practices
  1. Sub-component metrics
  2. Strategy to establish visibility into critical sub-components
  1. List of stakeholders
  2. Business requirements
  3. Technical requirements
  4. Inefficiencies
  1. Strategies for mitigating risks
  2. Completed capacity management plan template

PHASE 1

Conduct a Business Impact Analysis

Step 1.1: Conduct a business impact analysis

This step will walk you through the following activities:

  • Record applications and dependencies in the Business Impact Analysis Tool.
  • Define a scale to estimate the impact of various applications’ downtime.
  • Estimate the impact of applications’ downtime.

This involves the following participants:

  • Capacity manager
  • Infrastructure team

Outcomes of this step

  • Estimated impact of downtime for various applications

Execute a business impact analysis (BIA) as part of a broader availability plan

1.1a Business Impact Analysis Tool

Business impact analyses are an invaluable part of a broader IT strategy. Conducting a BIA benefits a variety of processes, including disaster recovery, business continuity, and availability and capacity management

STEP 1

STEP 2

STEP 3

STEP 4

STEP 5

Record applications and dependencies

Utilize your asset management records and document the applications and systems that IT is responsible for managing and recovering during a disaster.

Define impact scoring scale

Ensure an objective analysis of application criticality by establishing a business impact scale that applies to all applications.

Estimate impact of downtime

Leverage the scoring criteria from the previous step and establish an estimated impact of downtime for each application.

Identify desired RTO and RPO

Define what the RTOs/RPOs should be based on the impact of a business interruption and the tolerance for downtime and data loss.

Determine current RTO/RPO

Conduct tabletop planning and create a flowchart of your current capabilities. Compare your current state to the desired state from the previous step.

Info-Tech Insight

Engaging in detailed capacity planning for an insignificant service draws time and resources away from more critical capacity planning exercises. Time spent tracking and planning use of the ancient fax machine in the basement is time you’ll never get back.

Control the scope of your availability and capacity management planning project with a business impact analysis

Don’t avoid conducting a BIA because of a perception that it’s too onerous or not necessary. If properly managed, as described in this blueprint, the BIA does not need to be onerous and the benefits are tangible.

A BIA enables you to identify appropriate spend levels, continue to drive executive support, and prioritize disaster recovery planning for a more successful outcome. For example, an Info-Tech survey found that a BIA has a significant impact on setting appropriate recovery time objectives (RTOs) and appropriate spending.

The image contains a graph that is labelled: BIA Impact on Appropriate RTOS. With no BIA, there is 59% RTOs are appropriate. With BIA, there is 93% RTOS being appropriate. The image contains a graph that is labelled: BIA Impact on Appropriate Spending. No BIA has 59% indication that BCP is cost effective. With a BIA there is 86% indication that BCP is cost effective.

Terms

No BIA: lack of a BIA, or a BIA bases solely on the perceived importance of IT services.

BIA: based on a detailed evaluation or estimated dollar impact of downtime.

Source: Info-Tech Research Group; N=70

Select the services you wish to evaluate with the Business Impact Analysis Tool

1.1b 1 hour

In large organizations especially, collating an exhaustive list of applications and services is going to be onerous. For the purposes of this project, a subset should suffice.

Instructions

  1. Gather a diverse group of IT staff and end users in a room with a whiteboard.
  2. Solicit feedback from the group. Questions to ask:
  • What services do you regularly use? What do you see others using? (End users)
  • Which service inspires the greatest number of service calls? (IT)
  • What services are you most excited about? (Management)
  • What services are the most critical for business operations? (Everybody)
  • Record these applications in the Business Impact Analysis Tool.
  • Input

    • Applications/services

    Output

    • Candidate applications for the business impact analysis

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Infrastructure manager
    • Enterprise architect
    • Application owners
    • End users

    Info-Tech Insight

    Include a variety of services in your analysis. While it might be tempting to jump ahead and preselect important applications, don’t. The process is inherently valuable, and besides, it might surprise you.

    Record the applications and dependencies in the BIA tool

    1.1c Use tab 1 of the Business Impact Analysis Tool

    1. In the Application/System column, list the applications identified for this pilot as well as the Core Infrastructure category. Also indicate the Impact on the Business and Business Owner.
    2. List the dependencies for each application in the appropriate columns:
    • Hosted On-Premises (In-House) – If the physical equipment is in a facility you own, record it here, even if it is managed by a vendor.
    • Hosted by a Co-Lo/MSP – List any dependencies hosted by a co-lo/MSP vendor.
    • Cloud (includes "as a Service”) – List any dependencies hosted by a cloud vendor.

    Note: If there are no dependencies for a particular category, leave it blank.

  • If you wish to highlight specific dependencies, put an asterisk in front of them (e.g. *SAN). This will cause the dependency to be highlighted in the remaining tabs in this tool.
  • Add comments as needed in the Notes columns. For example, for equipment that you host in-house but is remotely managed by an MSP, specify this in the notes. Similarly, note any DR support services.
  • Example

    The image contains a screenshot of Info-Tech's Business Impact Analysis Tool specifically tab 1.

    ID is optional. It is a sequential number by default.

    In-House, Co-Lo/MSP, and Cloud dependencies; leave blank if not applicable.

    Add notes as applicable – e.g. critical support services.

    Define a scoring scale to estimate different levels of impact

    1.1d Use tab 2 of the Business Impact Analysis Tool

    Modify the Business Impact Scales headings and Overall Criticality Rating terminology to suit your organization. For example, if you don’t have business partners, use that column to measure a different goodwill impact or just ignore that column in this tool (i.e. leave it blank). Estimate the different levels of potential impact (where four is the highest impact and zero is no impact) and record these in the Business Impact Scales columns.

    The image contains a screenshot of Info-Tech's Business Impact Analysis Tool, specifically tab 2.

    Estimate the impact of downtime for each application

    1.1e Use tab 3 of the Business Impact Analysis Tool

    In the BIA tab columns for Direct Costs of Downtime, Impact on Goodwill, and Additional Criticality Factors, use the drop-down menu to assign a score of zero to four based on levels of impact defined in the Scoring Criteria tab. For example, if an organization’s ERP is down, and that affects call center sales operations (e.g. ability to access customer records and process orders), the impact might be as described below:

      • Loss of Revenue might score a two or three depending on the proportion of overall sales lost due to the downtime.
      • The Impact on Customers might be a one or two depending on the extent that existing customers might be using the call center to purchase new products or services, and are frustrated by the inability to process orders.
      • The Legal/Regulatory Compliance and Health or Safety Risk might be a zero.

    On the other hand, if payroll processing is down, this may not impact revenue, but it certainly impacts internal goodwill and productivity.

    Rank service criticality: gold, silver, and bronze

    Gold

    Mission critical services. An outage is catastrophic in terms of cost or public image/goodwill. Example: trading software at a financial institution.

    Silver

    Important to daily operations, but not mission critical. Example: email services at any large organization.

    Bronze

    Loss of these services is an inconvenience more than anything, though they do serve a purpose and will be missed if they are never brought back online. Example: ancient fax machines.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Info-Tech recommends gold, silver, and bronze because of this typology’s near universal recognition. If you would prefer a particular designation (it might help with internal comprehension), don’t hesitate to use that one instead.

    Use the results of the business impact analysis to sort systems based on their criticality

    1.1f 1 hour

    Every organization has its own rules about how to categorize service importance. For some (consumer-facing businesses, perhaps) reputational damage may trump immediate costs.

    Instructions

    1. Gather a group of key stakeholders and project the completed Business Impact Analysis Tool onto a screen for them.
    2. Share the definitions of gold, silver, and bronze services with them (if they are not familiar), and begin sorting the services by category,
    • How long would it take to notice if a particular service went out?
    • How important are the non-quantifiable damages that could come with an outage?
  • Sort the services into gold, silver, and bronze on a whiteboard, with sticky notes, or with chart paper.
  • Verify your findings and record them in section 2.1 of the Capacity Plan Template.
  • Input

    • Results of the business impact analysis exercise

    Output

    • List of gold, silver, and bronze systems

    Materials

    • Projector
    • Business Impact Analysis Tool
    • Capacity Plan Template

    Participants

    • Infrastructure manager
    • Enterprise architect

    Leverage the rest of the BIA tool as part of your disaster recovery planning

    Disaster recovery planning is a critical activity, and while it is a sort of availability management, it is beyond this project’s scope. You can complete the business impact analysis (including RTOs and RPOs) for the complete disaster recovery package.

    See Info-Tech’s Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan blueprint for instructions on how to complete your business impact analysis.

    Step 1.2: Assign criticality ratings to services

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Create a list of dependencies for your most important applications.
    • Identify important sub-components.
    • Use best practices to develop and negotiate SLAs.

    This involves the following participants:

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure team

    Outcomes of this step

    • List of dependencies of most important applications
    • List of important sub-components
    • SLAs based on best practices

    Determine the base unit of the capacity you’re looking to purchase

    Not every IT organization should approach capacity the same way. Needs scale, and larger organizations will inevitably deal in larger quantities.

    Large cloud provider

    Local traditional business

    • Thousands of servers housed in a number of datacenters around the world.
    • Dedicated capacity manager.
    • Purchases components from OEMs in bulk as part of bespoke contracts that are worth many millions of dollars over time.
    • May deal with components at a massive scale (dozens of servers at once, for example).
    • A small server room that runs non-specialized services (email, for example).
    • Barely even a dedicated IT person, let alone an IT capacity manager.
    • Purchases new components from resellers or even retail stores.
    • Deals with components at a small scale (a single switch here, a server upgrade there).

    "Cloud capacity management is not exactly the same as the ITIL version because ITIL has a focus on the component level. I actually don’t do that, because if I did I’d go crazy. There’s too many components in a cloud environment."

    – Richie Mendoza, IT Consultant, SMITS Inc.

    Consider the relationship between component capacity and service capacity

    End users’ thoughts about IT are based on what they see. They are, in other words, concerned with service availability: does the organization have the ability to provide access to needed services?

    Service

    • Email
    • CRM
    • ERP

    Component

    • Switch
    • SMTP server
    • Archive database
    • Storage

    "You don’t ask the CEO or the guy in charge ‘What kind of response time is your requirement?’ He doesn’t really care. He just wants to make sure that all his customers are happy."

    – Todd Evans, Capacity and Performance Management SME, IBM.

    One telco solved its availability issues by addressing component capacity issues

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Telecommunications

    Source: Interview

    Coffee and Wi-Fi – a match made in heaven

    In tens of thousands of coffee shops around the world, patrons make ample use of complimentary Wi-Fi. Wi-Fi is an important part of customers’ coffee shop experience, whether they’re online to check their email, do a YouTube, or update their Googles. So when one telco that provided Wi-Fi access for thousands of coffee shops started encountering availability issues, the situation was serious.

    Wi-Fi, whack-a-mole, and web woes

    The team responsible for resolving the issue took an ad hoc approach to resolving complaints, fixing issues as they came up instead of taking a systematic approach.

    Resolution

    Looking at the network as a whole, the capacity manager took a proactive approach by using data to identify and rank the worst service areas, and then directing the team responsible to fix those areas in order of the worst first, then the next worst, and so on. Soon the availability of Wi-Fi service was restored across the network.

    Create a list of dependencies for your most important applications

    1.2a 1.5 hours

    Instructions

    1. Work your way down the list of services outlined in step 1, starting with your gold systems. During the first iteration of this exercise select only 3-5 of your most important systems.
    2. Write the name of each application on a sticky note or at the top of a whiteboard (leaving ample space below for dependency mapping).
    3. In the first tier below the application, include the specific services that the general service provides.
    • This will vary based on the service in question, but an example for email is sending, retrieving, retrieving online, etc.
  • For each of the categories identified in step 3, identify the infrastructure components that are relevant to that system. Be broad and sweeping; if the component is involved in the service, include it here. The goal is to be exhaustive.
  • Leave the final version of the map intact. Photographing or making a digital copy for posterity. It will be useful in later activities.
  • Input

    • List of important applications

    Output

    • List of critical dependencies

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • Infrastructure manager
    • Enterprise architect

    Info-Tech Insight

    Dependency mapping can be difficult. Make sure you don’t waste effort creating detailed dependency maps for relatively unimportant services.

    Dependency mapping can be difficult. Make sure you don’t waste effort creating detailed dependency maps for relatively unimportant services.

    The image contains a sample dependency map on ride sharing. Ride Sharing has been split between two categories: Application and Drivers. Under drivers it branches out to: Availability, Car, and Pay. Under Application, it branches out to: Compute, Network, Edge devices, Q/A maintenance, and Storage. Compute branches out to Cloud Services. Network branches out to Cellular network and Local. Edge Devices branch out to Drivers and Users. Q/A maintenance does not have a following branch. Storage branches out to Storage (Enterprise) and Storage (local).

    Ride sharing cannot work, at least not at maximum effectiveness, without these constituent components. When one or more of these components are absent or degraded, the service will become unavailable. This example illustrates some challenges of capacity management; some of these components are necessary, but beyond the ride-sharing company’s control.

    Leverage a sample dependency tree for a common service

    The image contains a sample dependency tree for the Email service. Email branches out to: Filtering, Archiving, Retrieval, and Send/receive. Filtering branches out to security appliance which then branches out to CPU, Storage, and Network. Archiving branches to Archive server, which branches out to CPU, Storage, and Network. Retrieval branches out to IMAP/PoP which branches out to CPU, Storage, and Network. Send/receive branches out to IMAP/PoP and SMTP. SMTP branches out to CPU, Storage and Network.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Email is an example here not because it is necessarily a “gold system,” but because it is common across industries. This is a useful exercise for any service, but it can be quite onerous, so it should be conducted on the most important systems first.

    Separate the wheat from the chaff; identify important sub-components and separate them from unimportant ones

    1.2b 1.5 hours

    Use the bottom layer of the pyramid drawn in step 1.2a for a list of important sub-components.

    Instructions

    1. Record a list of the gold services identified in the previous activity. Leave space next to each service for sub-components.
    2. Go through each relevant sub-component. Highlight those that are critical and could reasonably be expected to cause problems.
    • Has this sub-component caused a problem in the past?
    • Is this sub-component a bottleneck?
    • What could cause this component to fail? Is it such an occurrence feasible?
  • Record the results of the exercise (and the service each sub-component is tied to) in tab 2 (columns B &C) of the Capacity Snapshot Tool.
  • Input

    • List of important applications

    Output

    • List of critical dependencies

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Infrastructure manager
    • Enterprise architect

    Understand availability commitments with SLAs

    With the rise of SaaS, cloud computing, and managed services, critical services and their components are increasingly external to IT.

    • IT’s lack of access to the internal working of services does not let them off the hook for performance issues (as much as that might be the dream).
    • Vendor management is availability management. Use the dependency map drawn earlier in this phase to highlight the components of critical services that rely on capacity that cannot be managed internally.
    • For each of these services ensure that an appropriate SLA is in place. When acquiring new services, ensure that the vendor SLA meets business requirements.

    The image contains a large blue circle labelled: Availability. Also in the blue circle is a small red circle labelled: Capacity.

    In terms of service provision, capacity management is a form of availability management. Not all availability issues are capacity issues, but the inverse is true.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Capacity issues will always cause availability issues, but availability issues are not inherently capacity issues. Availability problems can stem from outages unrelated to capacity (e.g. power or vendor outages).

    Use best practices to develop and negotiate SLAs

    1.2c 20 minutes per service

    When signing contracts with vendors, you will be presented with an SLA. Ensure that it meets your requirements.

    1. Use the business impact analysis conducted in this project’s first step to determine your requirements. How much downtime can you tolerate for your critical services?
    2. Once you have been presented with an SLA, be sure to scour it for tricks. Remember, just because a vendor offers “five nines” of availability doesn’t mean that you’ll actually get that much uptime. It could be that the vendor is comfortable eating the cost of downtime or that the contract includes provisions for planned maintenance. Whether or not the vendor anticipated your outage does little to mitigate the damage an outage can cause to your business, so be careful of these provisions.
    3. Ensure that the person ultimately responsible for the SLA (the approver) understands the limitations of the agreement and the implications for availability.

    Input

    • List of external component dependencies

    Output

    • SLA requirements

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Infrastructure manager
    • Enterprise architect

    Info-Tech Insight

    Vendors are sometimes willing to eat the cost of violating SLAs if they think it will get them a contract. Be careful with negotiation. Just because the vendor says they can do something doesn’t make it true.

    Negotiate internal SLAs using Info-Tech’s rigorous process

    Talking past each other can drive misalignment between IT and the business, inconveniencing all involved. Quantify your needs through an internal SLA as part of a comprehensive availability management plan.

    See Info-Tech’s Improve IT-Business Alignment Through an Internal SLA blueprint for instructions on why you should develop internal SLAs and the potential benefits they bring.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

    The image contains a picture of an Info-Tech analyst.

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    1.2

    The image contains a screenshot of activity 1.2 as previously described above.

    Create a list of dependencies for your most important applications

    Using the results of the business impact analysis, the analyst will guide workshop participants through a dependency mapping exercise that will eventually populate the Capacity Plan Template.

    Phase 1 Guided Implementation

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 1: Conduct a business impact analysis

    Proposed Time to Completion: 1 week

    Step 1.1: Create a scale to measure different levels of impact

    Review your findings with an analyst

    Discuss how you arrived at the rating of your critical systems and their dependencies. Consider whether your external SLAs are appropriate.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Use the results of the business impact analysis to sort systems based on their criticality

    With these tools & templates:

    Business Impact Analysis Tool

    Step 1.2: Assign criticality ratings to services

    Review your findings with an analyst

    Discuss how you arrived at the rating of your critical systems and their dependencies. Consider whether your external SLAs are appropriate.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Create a list of dependencies for your most important applications
    • Identify important sub-components
    • Use best practices to develop and negotiate SLAs

    With these tools & templates:

    Capacity Snapshot Tool

    Phase 1 Results & Insights:

    • Engaging in detailed capacity planning for an insignificant service is a waste of resources. Focus on ensuring availability for your most critical systems.
    • Carefully evaluate vendors’ service offerings. Make sure the SLA works for you, and approach pie-in-the-sky promises with skepticism.

    PHASE 2

    Establish Visibility Into Core Systems

    Step 2.1: Define your monitoring strategy

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Determine the indicators you should be tracking for each sub-component.

    This involves the following participants:

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure team

    Outcomes of this step

    • List of indicators to track for each sub-component

    Data has its significance—but also its limitations

    The rise of big data can be a boon for capacity managers, but be warned: not all data is created equal. Bad data can lead to bad decisions – and unemployed capacity managers.

    Your findings are only as good as your data. Remember: garbage in, garbage out. There are three characteristics of good data:*

    1. Accuracy: is the data exact and correct? More detail and confidence is better.
    2. Reliability: is the data consistent? In other words, if you run the same test twice will you get the same results?
    3. Validity: is the information gleaned believable and relevant?

    *National College of Teaching & Leadership, “Reliability and Validity”

    "Data is king. Good data is absolutely essential to [the capacity manager] role."

    – Adrian Blant, Independent Capacity Consultant, IT Capability Solutions

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Every organization’s data needs are different; your data needs are going to be dictated by your services, delivery model, and business requirements. Make sure you don’t confuse volume with quality, even if others in your organization make that mistake.

    Take advantage of technology to establish visibility into your systems

    Managing your availability and capacity involves important decisions about what to monitor and how thresholds should be set.

    • Use the list of critical applications developed through the business impact analysis and the list of components identified in the dependency mapping exercise to produce a plan for effectively monitoring component availability and capacity.
    • The nature of IT service provision – the multitude of vendors providing hardware and services necessary for even simple IT services to work effectively – means that it is unlikely that capacity management will be visible through a single pane of glass. In other words, “email” and “CRM” don’t have a defined capacity. It always depends.
    • Establishing visibility into systems involves identifying what needs to be tracked for each component.

    Too much monitoring can be as bad as the inverse

    In 2013, a security breach at US retailer Target compromised more than 70 million customers’ data. The company received an alert, but it was thought to be a false positive because the monitoring system produced so many false and redundant alerts. As a result of the daily deluge, staff did not respond to the breach in time.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Don’t confuse monitoring with management. While establishing visibility is a crucial step, it is only part of the battle. Move on to this project’s next phase to explore opportunities to improve your capacity/availability management process.

    Determine the indicators you should be tracking for each sub-component

    2.1a Tab 3 of the Capacity Snapshot Tool

    It is nearly impossible to overstate the importance of data to the process of availability and capacity management. But the wrong data will do you no good.

    Instructions

    1. Open the Capacity Snapshot Tool to tab 2. The tool should have been populated in step 1.2 as part of the component mapping exercise.
    2. For each service, determine which metric(s) would most accurately tell the component’s story. Consider the following questions when completing this activity (you may end up with more than one metric):
    • How would the component’s capacity be measured (storage space, RAM, bandwidth, vCPUs)?
    • Is the metric in question actionable?
  • Record each metric in the Metric column (D) of the Capacity Snapshot Tool. Use the adjacent column for any additional information on metrics.
  • Info-Tech Insight

    Bottlenecks are bad. Use the Capacity Snapshot Tool (or another tool like it) to ensure that when the capacity manager leaves (on vacation, to another role, for good) the knowledge that they have accumulated does not leave as well.

    Understand the limitations of this approach

    Although we’ve striven to make it as easy as possible, this process will inevitably be cumbersome for organizations with a complicated set of software, hardware, and cloud services.

    Tracking every single component in significant detail will produce a lot of noise for each bit of signal. The approach outlined here addresses that concern in two ways:

    • A focus on gold services
    • A focus on sub-components that have a reasonable likelihood of being problematic in the future.

    Despite this effort, however, managing capacity at the component level is a daunting task. Ultimately, tools provided by vendors like SolarWinds and AppDynamics will fill in some of the gaps. Nevertheless, an understanding of the conceptual framework underlying availability and capacity management is valuable.

    Step 2.2: Implement your monitoring tool/aggregator

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Clarify visibility.
    • Determine whether or not you have sufficiently granular visibility.
    • Develop strategies to .any visibility issues.

    This involves the following participants:

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure team
    • Applications personnel

    Outcomes of this step

    • Method for measuring and monitoring critical sub-components

    Companies struggle with performance monitoring because 95% of IT shops don’t have full visibility into their environments

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Financial Services

    Source: AppDynamics

    Challenge

    • Users are quick to provide feedback when there is downtime or application performance degradation.
    • The challenge for IT teams is that while they can feel the pain, they don’t have visibility into the production environment and thus cannot identify where the pain is coming from.
    • The most common solution that organizations rely on is leveraging the log files for issue diagnosis. However, this method is slow and often unable to pinpoint the problem areas, leading to delays in problem resolution.

    Solution

    • Application and infrastructure teams need to work together to develop infrastructure flow maps and transaction profiles.
    • These diagrams will highlight the path that each transaction travels across your infrastructure.
    • Ideally at this point, teams will also capture latency breakdowns across every tier that the business transaction flows through.
      • This will ultimately kick start the baselining process.

    Results

    • Ninety-five percent of IT departments don’t have full visibility into their production environment. As a result, a slow business transaction will often require a war-room approach where SMEs from across the organization gather to troubleshoot.
    • Having visibility into the production environment through infrastructure flow mapping and transaction profiling will help IT teams pinpoint problems.
      • At the very least, teams will be able to identify common problem areas and expedite the root-cause analysis process.

    Source: “Just how complex can a Login Transaction be? Answer: Very!,” AppDynamics

    Monitor your critical sub-components

    Establishing a monitoring plan for your capacity involves answering two questions: can I see what I need to see, and can I see it with sufficient granularity?

    • Having the right tool for the job is an important step towards effective capacity and availability management.
    • Application performance management tools (APMs) are essential to the process, but they tend to be highly specific and vertically oriented, like using a microscope.
    • Some product families can cover a wider range of capacity monitoring functions (SolarWinds, for example). It is still important, however, to codify your monitoring needs.

    "You don’t use a microscope to monitor an entire ant farm, but you might use many microscopes to monitor specific ants."

    – Fred Chagnon, Research Director, Infrastructure Practice, Info-Tech Research Group

    Monitor your sub-components: clarify visibility

    2.2a Tab 2 of the Capacity Snapshot Tool

    The next step in capacity management is establishing whether or not visibility (in the broad sense) is available into critical sub-components.

    Instructions

    1. Open the Capacity Snapshot Tool and record the list of sub-components identified in the previous step.
    2. For each sub-component answer the following question:
    • Do I have easy access to the information I need to monitor to ensure this component remains available?
  • Select “Yes” or “No” from the drop-down menus as appropriate. In the adjacent column record details about visibility into the component.
    • What tool provides the information? Where can it be found?

    The image contains a screenshot of Info-Tech's Capacity Snapshot Tool, Tab 2.

    Monitor your sub-components; determine whether or not you have sufficient granular visibility

    2.2b Tab 2 of the Capacity Snapshot Tool

    Like ideas and watches, not all types of visibility are created equal. Ensure that you have access to the right information to make capacity decisions.

    Instructions

    1. For each of the sub-components clarify the appropriate level of granularity for the visibility gained to be useful. In the case of storage, for example, is raw usage (in gigabytes) sufficient, or do you need a breakdown of what exactly is taking up the space? The network might be more complicated.
    2. Record the details of this ideation in the adjacent column.
    3. Select “Yes” or “No” from the drop-down menu to track the status of each sub-component.

    The image contains a picture of an iPhone storage screen where it breaks down the storage into the following categories: apps, media, photos, and other.

    For most mobile phone users, this breakdown is sufficient. For some, more granularity might be necessary.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Make note of monitoring tools and strategies. If anything changes, be sure to re-evaluate the visibility status. An outdated spreadsheet can lead to availability issues if management is unaware of looming problems.

    Develop strategies to ameliorate any visibility issues

    2.2c 1 hour

    The Capacity Snapshot Tool color-codes your components by status. Green – visibility and granularity are both sufficient; yellow – visibility exists, though not at sufficient granularity; and red – visibility does not exist at all.

    Instructions

    1. Write each of the yellow and red sub-components on a whiteboard or piece of chart paper.
    2. Brainstorm amelioration strategies for each of the problematic sub-components.
    • Does the current monitoring tool have sufficient functionality?
    • Does it need to be further configured/customized?
    • Do we need a whole new tool?
  • Record these strategies in the Amelioration Strategy column on tab 4 of the tool.
  • Input

    • Sub-components
    • Capacity Snapshot Tool

    Output

    • Amelioration strategies

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Capacity Snapshot Tool

    Participants

    • Infrastructure manager

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    It might be that there is no amelioration strategy. Make note of this difficulty and highlight it as part of the risk section of the Capacity Plan Template.

    See Info-Tech’s projects on storage and network modernization for additional details

    Leverage other products for additional details on how to modernize your network and storage services.

    The process of modernizing the network is fraught with vestigial limitations. Develop a program to gather requirements and plan.

    As part of the blueprint, Modernize Enterprise Storage, the Modernize Enterprise Storage Workbook includes a section on storage capacity planning.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

    The image contains a picture of an Info-Tech analyst.

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    2.2

    The image contains a screenshot of activity 2.2.

    Develop strategies to ameliorate visibility issues

    The analyst will guide workshop participants in brainstorming potential solutions to visibility issues and record them in the Capacity Snapshot Tool.

    Phase 2 Guided Implementation

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 2: Establish visibility into core systems

    Proposed Time to Completion: 3 weeks

    Step 2.1: Define your monitoring strategy

    Review your findings with an analyst

    Discuss your monitoring strategy and ensure you have sufficient visibility for the needs of your organization.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Determine the indicators you should be tracking for each sub-component

    With these tools & templates:

    • Capacity Snapshot Tool

    Step 2.2: Implement your monitoring tool/aggregator

    Review your findings with an analyst

    Discuss your monitoring strategy and ensure you have sufficient visibility for the needs of your organization.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Clarify visibility
    • Determine whether or not you have sufficiently granular visibility
    • Develop strategies to ameliorate any visibility issues

    With these tools & templates:

    • Capacity Snapshot Tool

    Phase 2 Results & Insights:

    • Every organization’s data needs are different. Adapt data gathering, reporting, and analysis according to your services, delivery model, and business requirements.
    • Don’t confuse monitoring with management. Build a system to turn reported data into useful information that feeds into the capacity management process.

    PHASE 3

    Solicit and Incorporate Business Needs

    Step 3.1: Solicit business needs and gather data

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Build relationships with business stakeholders.
    • Analyze usage data and identify trends.
    • Correlate usage trends with business needs.

    This involves the following participants:

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure team members
    • Business stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • System for involving business stakeholders in the capacity planning process
    • Correlated data on business level, service level, and infrastructure level capacity usage

    Summarize your capacity planning activities in the Capacity Plan Template

    The availability and capacity management summary card pictured here is a handy way to capture the results of the activities undertaken in the following phases. Note its contents carefully, and be sure to record specific outputs where appropriate. One such card should be completed for each of the gold services identified in the project’s first phase. Make note of the results of the activities in the coming phase, and populate the Capacity Snapshot Tool. These will help you populate the tool.

    The image contains a screenshot of Info-Tech's Capacity Plan Template.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    The Capacity Plan Template is designed to be a part of a broader mapping strategy. It is not a replacement for a dedicated monitoring tool.

    Analyze historical trends as a crucial source of data

    The first place to look for information about your organization is not industry benchmarks or your gut (though those might both prove useful).

    • Where better to look than internally? Use the data you’ve gathered from your APM tool or other sources to understand your historical capacity needs and to highlight any periods of unavailability.
    • Consider monitoring the status of the capacity of each of your crucial components. The nature of this monitoring will vary based on the component in question. It can range from a rough Excel sheet all the way to a dedicated application performance monitoring tool.

    "In all cases the very first thing to do is to look at trending…The old adage is ‘you don’t steer a boat by its wake,’ however it’s also true that if something is growing at, say, three percent a month and it has been growing at three percent a month for the last twelve months, there’s a fairly good possibility that it’s going to carry on going in that direction."

    – Mike Lynch, Consultant, CapacityIQ

    Gather relevant data at the business level

    3.1a 2 hours per service

    A holistic approach to capacity management involves peering beyond the beaded curtain partitioning IT from the rest of the organization and tracking business metrics.

    Instructions

    1. Your service/application owners know how changes in business activities impact their systems. Business level capacity management involves responding to those changes. Ask service/application owners what changes will impact their capacity. Examples include:
    • Business volume (net new customers, number of transactions)
    • Staff changes (new hires, exits, etc.)
  • For each gold service, brainstorm relevant metrics. How can you capture that change in business volume?
  • Record these metrics in the summary card of the Capacity Plan Template.
  • In the notes section of the summary card record whether or not you have access to the required business metric.
  • Input

    • Brainstorming
    • List of gold services

    Output

    • Business level data

    Materials

    • In-house solution or commercial tool

    Participants

    • Capacity manager
    • Application/service owners

    Gather relevant data at the service level

    3.1b 2 hours per service

    One level of abstraction down is the service level. Service level capacity management, recall that service level capacity management is about ensuring that IT is meeting SLAs in its service provision.

    Instructions

    1. There should be internal SLAs for each service IT offers. (If not, that’s a good place to start. See Info-Tech’s research on the subject.) Prod each of your service owners for information on the metrics that are relevant for their SLAs. Consider the following:
    • Peak hours, requests per second, etc.
    • This will usually include some APM data.
  • Record these metrics in the summary card of the Capacity Plan Template.
  • Include any visibility issues in the notes in a similar section of the Capacity Plan Template.
  • Input

    • Brainstorming
    • List of gold services

    Output

    • Service level data

    Materials

    • In-house solution or commercial tool

    Participants

    • Capacity manager
    • Application/service owners

    Leverage the visibility into your infrastructure components and compare all of your data over time

    You established visibility into your components in the second phase of this project. Use this data, and that gathered at the business and service levels, to begin analyzing your demand over time.

    • Different organizations will approach this issue differently. Those with a complicated service catalog and a dedicated capacity manager might employ a tool like TeamQuest. If your operation is small, or you need to get your availability and capacity management activities underway as quickly as possible, you might consider using a simple spreadsheet software like Excel.
    • If you choose the latter option, select a level of granularity (monthly, weekly, etc.) and produce a line graph in Excel.
    • Example: Employee count (business metric)

    Jan

    Feb

    Mar

    Apr

    May

    June

    July

    74

    80

    79

    83

    84

    100

    102

    The image contains a graph using the example of employee count described above.

    Note: the strength of this approach is that it is easy to visualize. Use the same timescale to facilitate simple comparison.

    Manage, don’t just monitor; mountains of data need to be turned into information

    Information lets you make a decision. Understand the questions you don’t need to ask, and ask the right ones.

    "Often what is really being offered by many analytics solutions is just more data or information – not insights."

    – Brent Dykes, Director of Data Strategy, Domo

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    You can have all the data in the world and absolutely nothing valuable to add. Don’t fall for this trap. Use the activities in this phase to structure your data collection operation and ensure that your organization’s availability and capacity management plan is data driven.

    Analyze historical trends and track your services’ status

    3.1c Tab 3 of the Capacity Snapshot Tool

    At-a-glance – it’s how most executives consume all but the most important information. Create a dashboard that tracks the status of your most important systems.

    Instructions

    1. Consult infrastructure leaders for information about lead times for new capacity for relevant sub-components and include that information in the tool.
    • Look to historical lead times. (How long does it traditionally take to get more storage?)
    • If you’re not sure, contact an in-house expert, or speak to your vendor
  • Use tab 3 of the tool to record whether your existing capacity will be exceeded before you can stand more hardware up (red), you have a plan to ameliorate capacity issues but new capacity is not yet in place (yellow), or if you are not slated to run out of capacity any time soon (green).
  • Repeat the activity regularly. Include notes about spikes that might present capacity challenges, and information about when capacity may run out.
  • This tool collates and presents information gathered from other sources. It is not a substitute for a performance monitoring tool.

    Build a list of key business stakeholders

    3.1d 10 minutes

    Stakeholder analysis is crucial. Lines of authority can be diffuse. Understand who needs to be involved in the capacity management process early on.

    Instructions

    1. With the infrastructure team, brainstorm a group of departments, roles, and people who may impact demand on capacity.
    2. Go through the list with your team and identify stakeholders from two groups:
    • Line of business: who in the business makes use of the service?
    • Application owner: who in IT is responsible for ensuring the service is up?
  • Insert the list into section 3 of the Capacity Plan Template, and update as needed.
  • Input

    • Gold systems
    • Personnel Information

    Output

    • List of key business stakeholders

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure staff

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Consider which departments are most closely aligned with the business processes that fuel demand. Prioritize those that have the greatest impact. Consider the stakeholders who will make purchasing decisions for increasing infrastructure capacity.

    Organize stakeholder meetings

    3.1e 10 hours

    Establishing a relationship with your stakeholders is a necessary step in managing your capacity and availability.

    Instructions

    1. Gather as many of the stakeholders identified in the previous activity as you can and present information on availability and capacity management
    • If you can’t get everyone in the same room, a virtual meeting or even an email blast could get the job done.
  • Explain the importance of capacity and availability management
    • Consider highlighting the trade-offs between cost and availability.
  • Field any questions the stakeholders might have about the process. Be honest. The goal of this meeting is to build trust. This will come in handy when you’re gathering business requirements.
  • Propose a schedule and seek approval from all present. Include the results in section 3 of the Capacity Plan Template.
  • Input

    • List of business stakeholders
    • Hard work

    Output

    • Working relationship, trust
    • Regular meetings

    Materials

    • Work ethic
    • Executive brief

    Participants

    • Capacity manager
    • Business stakeholders

    Info-Tech Insight

    The best capacity managers develop new business processes that more closely align their role with business stakeholders. Building these relationships takes hard work, and you must first earn the trust of the business.

    Bake stakeholders into the planning process

    3.1f Ongoing

    Convince, don’t coerce. Stakeholders want the same thing you do. Bake them into the planning process as a step towards this goal.

    1. Develop a system to involve stakeholders regularly in the capacity planning process.
    • Your system will vary depending on the structure and culture of your organization.
    • See the case study on the following slide for ideas.
    • It may be as simple as setting a recurring reminder in your own calendar to touch base with stakeholders.
  • Liaise with stakeholders regularly to keep abreast of new developments.
    • Ensure stakeholders have reasonable expectations about IT’s available resources, the costs of providing capacity, and the lead times required to source additional needed capacity.
  • Draw on these stakeholders for the step “Gather information on business requirements” later in this phase.
  • Input

    • List of business stakeholders
    • Ideas

    Output

    • Capacity planning process that involves stakeholders

    Materials

    • Meeting rooms

    Participants

    • Capacity manager
    • Business stakeholders
    • Infrastructure team

    A capacity manager in financial services wrangled stakeholders and produced results

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Financial Services

    Source: Interview

    In financial services, availability is king

    In the world of financial services, availability is absolutely crucial. High-value trades occur at all hours, and any institution that suffers outages runs the risk of losing tens of thousands of dollars, not to mention reputational damage.

    People know what they want, but sometimes they have to be herded

    While line of business managers and application owners understand the value of capacity management, it can be difficult to establish the working relationship necessary for a fruitful partnership.

    Proactively building relationships keeps services available

    He built relationships with all the department heads on the business side, and all the application owners.

    • He met with department heads quarterly.
    • He met with application owners and business liaisons monthly.

    He established a steering committee for capacity.

    He invited stakeholders to regular capacity planning meetings.

    • The first half of each meeting was high-level outlook, such as business volume and IT capacity utilization, and included stakeholders from other departments.
    • The second half of the meeting was more technical, serving the purpose for the infrastructure team.

    He scheduled lunch and learn sessions with business analysts and project managers.

    • These are the gatekeepers of information, and should know that IT needs to be involved when things come down the pipeline.

    Step 3.2: Analyze data and project future needs

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Solicit needs from the business.
    • Map business needs to technical requirements, and technical requirements to infrastructure requirements.
    • Identify inefficiencies in order to remedy them.
    • Compare the data across business, component, and service levels, and project your capacity needs.

    This involves the following participants:

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure team members
    • Business stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • Model of how business processes relate to technical requirements and their demand on infrastructure
    • Method for projecting future demand for your organization’s infrastructure
    • Comparison of current capacity usage to projected demand

    “Nobody tells me anything!” – the capacity manager’s lament

    Sometimes “need to know” doesn’t register with sales or marketing. Nearly every infrastructure manager can share a story about a time when someone has made a decision that has critically impacted IT infrastructure without letting anyone in IT in on the “secret.”

    In brief

    The image contains a picture of a man appearing to be overwhelmed.

    Imagine working for a media company as an infrastructure capacity manager. Now imagine that the powers that be have decided to launch a content-focused web service. Seems like something they would do, right? Now imagine you find out about it the same way the company’s subscribers do. This actually happened – and it shouldn’t have. But a similar lack of alignment makes this a real possibility for any organization. If you don’t establish a systematic plan for soliciting and incorporating business requirements, prepare to lose a chunk of your free time. The business should never be able to say, in response to “nobody tells me anything,” “nobody asked.”

    Pictured: an artist’s rendering of the capacity manager in question.

    Directly solicit requirements from the business

    3.2a 30 minutes per stakeholder

    Once you’ve established, firmly, that everyone’s on the same team, meet individually with the stakeholders to assess capacity.

    Instructions

    1. Schedule a one-on-one meeting with each line of business manager (stakeholders identified in 3.1). Ideally this will be recurring.
    • Experienced capacity managers suggest doing this monthly.
  • In the meeting address the following questions:
    • What are some upcoming major initiatives?
    • Is the department going to expand or contract in a noticeable way?
    • Have customers taken to a particular product more than others?
  • Include the schedule in the Capacity Plan Template, and consider including details of the discussion in the notes section in tab 3 of the Capacity Snapshot Tool.
  • Input

    • Stakeholder opinions

    Output

    • Business requirements

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure staff

    Info-Tech Insight

    Sometimes line of business managers will evade or ignore you when you come knocking. They do this because they don’t know and they don’t want to give you the wrong information. Explain that a best guess is all you can ask for and allay their fears.

    Below, you will find more details about what to look for when soliciting information from the line of business manager you’ve roped into your scheme.

    1. Consider the following:
    • Projected sales pipeline
    • Business growth
    • Seasonal cycles
    • Marketing campaigns
    • New applications and features
    • New products and services
  • Encourage business stakeholders to give you their best guess for elements such as projected sales or business growth.
  • Estimate variance and provide a range. What can you expect at the low end? The high end? Record your historical projections for an idea of how accurate you are.
  • Consider carefully the infrastructure impact of new features (and record this in the notes section of the Capacity Snapshot Tool).
  • Directly solicit requirements from the business (optional)

    3.2a 1 hour

    IT staff and line of business staff come with different skillsets. This can lead to confusion, but it doesn’t have to. Develop effective information solicitation techniques.

    Instructions

    1. Gather your IT staff in a room with a whiteboard. As a group, select a gold service/line of business manager you would like to use as a “practice dummy.”
    2. Have everyone write down a question they would ask of the line of business representative in a hypothetical business/service capacity discussion.
    3. As a group discuss the merits of the questions posed:
    • Are they likely to yield productive information?
    • Are they too vague or specific?
    • Is the person in question likely to know the answer?
    • Is the information requested a guarded trade secret?
  • Discuss the findings and include any notes in section 3 of the Capacity Plan Template.
  • Input

    • Workshop participants’ ideas

    Output

    • Interview skills

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure staff

    Map business needs to technical requirements, and technical requirements to infrastructure requirements

    3.2b 5 hours

    When it comes to mapping technical requirements, IT alone has the ability to effectively translate business needs.

    Instructions

    1. Use your notes from stakeholder meetings to assess the impact of any changes on gold systems.
    2. For each system brainstorm with infrastructure staff (and any technical experts as necessary) about what the information gleaned from stakeholder discussions. Consider the following discussion points:
    • How has demand for the service been trending? Does it match what the business is telling us?
    • Have we had availability issues in the past?
    • Has the business been right with their estimates in the past?
  • Estimate what a change in business/service metrics means for capacity.
    • E.g. how much RAM does a new email user require?
  • Record the output in the summary card of the Capacity Plan Template.
  • Input

    • Business needs

    Output

    • Technical and infrastructure requirements

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure staff

    Info-Tech Insight

    Adapt the analysis to the needs of your organization. One capacity manager called the one-to-one mapping of business process to infrastructure demand the Holy Grail of capacity management. If this level of precision isn’t attainable, develop your own working estimates using the higher-level data

    Avoid putting too much faith in the cloud as a solution to your problem

    Has the rise of on-demand, functionally unlimited services eliminated the need for capacity and availability management?

    Capacity management

    The role of the capacity manager is changing, but it still has a purpose. Consider this:

    • Not everything can move to the cloud. For security/functionality reasons, on-premises infrastructure will continue to exist.
    • Cost management is more relevant than ever in the cloud age. Manage your instances.
    • While a cloud migration might render some component capacity management functions irrelevant, it could increase the relevance of others (the network, perhaps).

    Availability management

    Ensuring services are available is still IT’s wheelhouse, even if that means a shift to a brokerage model:

    • Business availability requirements (as part of the business impact analysis, potentially) are important; internal SLAs and contracts with vendors need to be managed.
    • Even in the cloud environment, availability is not guaranteed. Cloud providers have outages (unplanned, maintenance related, etc.) and someone will have to understand the limitations of cloud services and the impact on availability.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The cloud comes at the cost of detailed performance data. Sourcing a service through an SLA with a third party increases the need to perform your own performance testing of gold level applications. See performance monitoring.

    Beware Parkinson’s law

    A consequence of our infinite capacity for creativity, people have the enviable skill of making work. In 1955, C. Northcote Parkinson pointed out this fact in The Economist . What are the implications for capacity management?

    "It is a commonplace observation that work expands so as to fill the time available for its completion. Thus, an elderly lady of leisure can spend the entire day in writing and despatching a postcard to her niece at Bognor Regis. An hour will be spent in finding the postcard, another in hunting for spectacles, half-an-hour in a search for the address, an hour and a quarter in composition, and twenty minutes in deciding whether or not to take an umbrella when going to the pillar-box in the next street."

    C. Northcote Parkinson, The Economist, 1955

    Info-Tech Insight

    If you give people lots of capacity, they will use it. Most shops are overprovisioned, and in some cases that’s throwing perfectly good money away. Don’t be afraid to prod if someone requests something that doesn’t seem right.

    Optimally align demand and capacity

    When it comes to managing your capacity, look for any additional efficiencies.

    Questions to ask:

    • Are there any infrastructure services that are not being used to their full potential, sitting idle, or allocated to non-critical or zombie functions?
      • Are you managing your virtual servers? If, for example, you experience a seasonal spike in demand, are you leaving virtual machines running after the fact?
    • Do your organization’s policies and your infrastructure setup allow for the use of development resources for production during periods of peak demand?
    • Can you make organizational or process changes in order to satisfy demand more efficiently?

    In brief

    Who isn’t a sports fan? Big games mean big stakes for pool participants and armchair quarterbacks—along with pressure on the network as fans stream games from their work computers. One organization suffered from this problem, and, instead of taking a hardline and banning all streams, opted to stream the game on a large screen in a conference room where those interested could work for its duration. This alleviated strain on the network and kept staff happy.

    Shutting off an idle cloud to cut costs

    CASE STUDY

    Industry:Professional Services

    Source:Interview

    24/7 AWS = round-the-clock costs

    A senior developer realized that his development team had been leaving AWS instances running without any specific reason.

    Why?

    The development team appreciated the convenience of an always-on instance and, because the people spinning them up did not handle costs, the problem wasn’t immediately apparent.

    Resolution

    In his spare time over the course of a month, the senior developer wrote a program to manage the servers, including shutting them down during times when they were not in use and providing remote-access start-up when required. His team alone saved $30,000 in costs over the next six months, and his team lead reported that it would have been more than worth paying the team to implement such a project on company time.

    Identify inefficiencies in order to remediate them

    3.2c 20 minutes per service

    Instructions

    1. Gather the infrastructure team together and discuss existing capacity and demand. Use the inputs from your data analysis and stakeholder meetings to set the stage for your discussion.
    2. Solicit ideas about potential inefficiencies from your participants:
    • Are VMs effectively allocated? If you need 7 VMs to address a spike, are those VMs being reallocated post-spike?
    • Are developers leaving instances running in the cloud?
    • Are particular services massively overprovisioned?
    • What are the biggest infrastructure line items? Are there obvious opportunities for cost reduction there?
  • Record any potential opportunities in the summary of the Capacity Plan Template.
  • Input

    • Gold systems
    • Data inputs

    Output

    • Inefficiencies

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure staff

    Info-Tech Insight

    The most effective capacity management takes a holistic approach and looks at the big picture in order to find ways to eliminate unnecessary infrastructure usage, or to find alternate or more efficient sources of required capacity.

    Dodging the toll troll by rerouting traffic

    CASE STUDY

    Industry:Telecommunications

    Source: Interview

    High-cost lines

    The capacity manager at a telecommunications provider mapped out his firm’s network traffic and discovered they were using a number of VP circuits (inter building cross connects) that were very expensive on the scale of their network.

    Paying the toll troll

    These VP circuits were supplying needed network services to the telecom provider’s clients, so there was no way to reduce this demand.

    Resolution

    The capacity manager analyzed where the traffic was going and compared this to the cost of the lines they were using. After performing the analysis, he found he could re-route much of the traffic away from the VP circuits and save on costs while delivering the same level of service to their users.

    Compare the data across business, component, and service levels, and project your capacity needs

    3.2d 2 hour session/meeting

    Make informed decisions about capacity. Remember: retain all documentation. It might come in handy for the justification of purchases.

    Instructions

    1. Using either a dedicated tool or generic spreadsheet software like Excel or Sheets, evaluate capacity trends. Ask the following questions:
    • Are there times when application performance degraded, and the service level was disrupted?
    • Are there times when certain components or systems neared, reached, or exceeded available capacity?
    • Are there seasonal variations in demand?
    • Are there clear trends, such as ongoing growth of business activity or the usage of certain applications?
    • What are the ramifications of trends or patterns in relation to infrastructure capacity?
  • Use the insight gathered from stakeholders during the stakeholder meetings, project required capacity for the critical components of each gold service.
  • Record the results of this activity in the summary card of the Capacity Plan Template.
  • Compare current capacity to your projections

    3.2e Section 5 of the Capacity Plan Template

    Capacity management (and, by extension, availability management) is a combination of two balancing acts: cost against capacity and supply and demand.*

    Instructions

    1. Compare your projections with your reality. You already know whether or not you have enough capacity given your lead times. But do you have too much? Compare your sub-component capacity projections to your current state.
    2. Highlight any outliers. Is there a particular service that is massively overprovisioned?
    3. Evaluate the reasons for the overprovisioning.
    • Is the component critically important?
    • Did you get a great deal on hardware?
    • Is it an oversight?
  • Record the results in the notes section of the summary card of the Capacity Plan Template.
  • *Office of Government Commerce 2001, 119.

    In brief

    The fractured nature of the capacity management space means that every organization is going to have a slightly different tooling strategy. No vendor has dominated, and every solution requires some level of customization. One capacity manager (a cloud provider, no less!) relayed a tale about a capacity management Excel sheet programmed with 5,000+ lines of code. As much work as that is, a bespoke solution is probably unavoidable.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

    The image contains a picture of an Info-Tech analyst.

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    3.2

    The image contains a screenshot of activity 3.2.

    Map business needs to technical requirements and technical requirements to infrastructure requirements

    The analyst will guide workshop participants in using their organization’s data to map out the relationships between applications, technical requirements, and the underlying infrastructure usage.

    Phase 3 Guided Implementation

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 3: Solicit and incorporate business needs

    Proposed Time to Completion: 2 weeks

    Step 3.1: Solicit business needs and gather data

    Review your findings with an analyst

    Discuss the effectiveness of your strategies to involve business stakeholders in the planning process and your methods of data collection and analysis.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Analyze historical trends and track your services’ status
    • Build a list of key business stakeholders
    • Bake stakeholders into the planning process

    With these tools & templates:

    Capacity Plan Template

    Step 3.2: Analyze data and project future needs

    Review your findings with an analyst

    Discuss the effectiveness of your strategies to involve business stakeholders in the planning process and your methods of data collection and analysis.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Map business needs to technical requirements and technical requirements to infrastructure requirements
    • Compare the data across business, component, and service levels, and project your capacity needs
    • Compare current capacity to your projections

    With these tools & templates:

    Capacity Snapshot Tool

    Capacity Plan Template

    Phase 3 Results & Insights:

    • Develop new business processes that more closely align your role with business stakeholders. Building these relationships takes hard work, and won’t happen overnight.
    • Take a holistic approach to eliminate unnecessary infrastructure usage or source capacity more efficiently.

    PHASE 4

    Identify and Mitigate Risks

    Step 4.1: Identify and mitigate risks

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify potential risks.
    • Determine strategies to mitigate risks.
    • Complete your capacity management plan.

    This involves the following participants:

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure team members
    • Business stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • Strategies for reducing risks
    • Capacity management plan

    Understand what happens when capacity/availability management fails

    1. Services become unavailable. If availability and capacity management are not constantly practiced, an inevitable consequence is downtime or a reduction in the quality of that service. Critical sub-component failures can knock out important systems on their own.
    2. Money is wasted. In response to fears about availability, it’s entirely possible to massively overprovision or switch entirely to a pay-as-you-go model. This, unfortunately, brings with it a whole host of other problems, including overspending. Remember: infinite capacity means infinite potential cost.
    3. IT remains reactive and is unable to contribute more meaningfully to the organization. If IT is constantly putting out capacity/availability-related fires, there is no room for optimization and activities to increase organizational maturity. Effective availability and capacity management will allow IT to focus on other work.

    Mitigate availability and capacity risks

    Availability: how often a service is usable (that is to say up and not too degraded to be effective). Consequences of reduced availability can include financial losses, impacted customer goodwill, and reduced faith in IT more generally.

    Causes of availability issues:

    • Poor capacity management – a service becomes unavailable when there is insufficient supply to meet demand. This is the result of poor capacity management.
    • Scheduled maintenance – services go down for maintenance with some regularity. This needs to be baked into service-level negotiations with vendors.
    • Vendor outages – sometimes vendors experience unplanned outages. There is typically a contract provision that covers unplanned outages, but that doesn’t change the fact that your service will be interrupted.

    Capacity: a particular component’s/service’s/business’ wiggle room. In other words, its usage ceiling.

    Causes of capacity issues:

    • Poor demand management – allowing users to run amok without any regard for how capacity is sourced and paid for.
    • Massive changes in legitimate demand – more usage means more demand.
    • Poor capacity planning – predictable changes in demand that go unaddressed can lead to capacity issues.

    Add additional potential causes of availability and capacity risks as needed

    4.1a 30 minutes

    Availability and capacity issues can stem from a number of different causes. Include a list in your availability and capacity management plan.

    Instructions

    1. Gather the group together. Go around the room and have participants provide examples of incidents and problems that have been the result of availability and capacity issues.
    2. Pose questions to the group about the source of those availability and capacity issues.
    • What could have been done differently to avoid these issues?
    • Was the availability/capacity issue a result of a faulty internal/external SLA?
  • Record the results of the exercise in sections 4.1 and 4.2 of the Capacity Plan Template.
  • Input

    • Capacity Snapshot Tool results

    Output

    • Additional sources of availability and capacity risks

    Materials

    • Capacity Plan Template

    Participants

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure staff

    Info-Tech Insight

    Availability and capacity problems result in incidents, critical incidents, and problems. These are addressed in a separate project (incident and problem management), but information about common causes can streamline that process.

    Identify capacity risks and mitigate them

    4.1b 30 minutes

    Based on your understanding of your capacity needs (through written SLAs and informal but regular meetings with the business) highlight major risks you foresee.

    Instructions

    1. Make a chart with two columns on a whiteboard. They should be labelled “risk” and “mitigation” respectively.
    2. Record risks to capacity you have identified in earlier activities.
    • Refer to the Capacity Snapshot Tool for components that are highlighted in red and yellow. These are specific components that present special challenges. Identify the risk(s) in as much detail as possible. Include service and business risks as well.
    • Examples: a marketing push will put pressure on the web server; a hiring push will require more Office 365 licenses; a downturn in registration will mean that fewer VMs will be required to run the service.

    Input

    • Capacity Snapshot Tool results

    Output

    • Inefficiencies

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure staff

    Info-Tech Insight

    It’s an old adage, but it checks out: don’t come to the table armed only with problems. Be a problem solver and prove IT’s value to the organization.

    Identify capacity risks and mitigate them (cont.)

    4.1b 1.5 hours

    Instructions (cont.)

    1. Begin developing mitigation strategies. Options for responding to known capacity risks fall into one of two camps:
    • Acceptance: responding to the risk is costlier than acknowledging its existence without taking any action. For gold systems, acceptance is typically not acceptable.
    • Mitigation: limiting/reducing, eliminating, or transferring risk (Herrera) comprise the sort of mitigation discussed here.
      • Limiting/reducing: taking steps to improve the capacity situation, but accepting some level of risk (spinning up a new VM, pushing back on demands from the business, promoting efficiency).
      • Eliminating: the most comprehensive (and most expensive) mitigation strategy, elimination could involve purchasing a new server or, at the extreme end, building a new datacenter.
      • Transfer: “robbing Peter to pay Paul,” in the words of capacity manager Todd Evans, is one potential way to limit your exposure. Is there a less critical service that can be sacrificed to keep your gold service online?
  • Record the results of this exercise in section 5 of the Capacity Plan Template.
  • Input

    • Capacity Snapshot Tool results

    Output

    • Capacity risk mitigations

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure staff

    Info-Tech Insight

    It’s an old adage, but it checks out: don’t come to the table armed only with problems. Be a problem solver and prove IT’s value to the organization.

    Identify availability risks and mitigate them

    4.1c 30 minutes

    While capacity management is a form of availability management, it is not the only form. In this activity, outline the specific nature of threats to availability.

    Instructions

    1. Make a chart with two columns on a whiteboard. They should be labelled “risk” and “mitigation” respectively.
    2. Begin brainstorming general availability risks based on the following sources of information/categories:
    • Vendor outages
    • Disaster recovery
    • Historical availability issues

    The image contains a large blue circle labelled: Availability. Also in the blue circle is a small red circle labelled: Capacity.

    Input

    • Capacity Snapshot Tool results

    Output

    • Availability risks and mitigations

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure staff

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    A dynamic central repository is a good way to ensure that availability issues stemming from a variety of causes are captured and mitigated.

    Identify availability risks and mitigate them (cont.)

    4.1c 1.5 hours

    Although it is easier said than done, identifying potential mitigations is a crucial part of availability management as an activity.

    Instructions (cont.)

    1. Begin developing mitigation strategies. Options for responding to known capacity risks fall into one of two camps:
    • Acceptance – responding to the risk is costlier than taking it on. Some unavailability is inevitable, between maintenance and unscheduled downtime. Record this, though it may not require immediate action.
    • Mitigation strategies:
      • Limiting/reducing – taking steps to increase availability of critical systems. This could include hot spares for unreliable systems or engaging a new vendor.
      • Eliminating – the most comprehensive (and most expensive) mitigation strategy. It could include selling.
      • Transfer – “robbing Peter to pay Paul,” in the words of capacity manager Todd Evans, is one potential way to limit your exposure. Is there a less critical service that can be sacrificed to keep your gold service online?
  • Record the results of this exercise in section 5 of Capacity Plan Template.
  • Input

    • Capacity Snapshot Tool results

    Output

    • Availability risks and mitigations

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure staff

    Iterate on the process and present your completed availability and capacity management plan

    The stakeholders consulted as part of the process will be interested in its results. Share them, either in person or through a collaboration tool.

    The current status of your availability and capacity management plan should be on the agenda for every stakeholder meeting. Direct the stakeholders’ attention to the parts of the document that are relevant to them, and solicit their thoughts on the document’s accuracy. Over time you should get a pretty good idea of who among your stakeholder group is skilled at projecting demand, and who over- or underestimates, and by how much. This information will improve your projections and, therefore, your management over time.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Use the experience gained and the artifacts generated to build trust with the business. The meetings should be regular, and demonstrating that you’re actually using the information for good is likely to make hesitant participants in the process more likely to open up.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

    The image contains a picture of an Info-Tech analyst.

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    4.1

    The image contains a screenshot of activity 4.1.

    Identify capacity risks and mitigate them

    The analyst will guide workshop participants in identifying potential risks to capacity and determining strategies for mitigating them.

    Phase 4 Guided Implementation

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 4: Identify and mitigate risks

    Proposed Time to Completion: 1 week

    Step 4.1: Identify and mitigate risks

    Review your findings with an analyst

    • Discuss your potential risks and your strategies for mitigating those risks.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Identify capacity risks and mitigate them
    • Identify availability risks and mitigate them
    • Complete your capacity management plan

    With these tools & templates:

    Capacity Snapshot Tool

    Capacity Plan Template

    Phase 4 Results & Insights:

    • Be a problem solver and prove IT’s value to the organization. Capacity management allows infrastructure to drive business value.
    • Iterate and share results. Reinforce your relationships with stakeholders and continue to refine how capacity management transforms your organization’s business processes.

    Insight breakdown

    Insight 1

    Components are critical to availability and capacity management.

    The CEO doesn’t care about the SMTP server. She cares about meeting customer needs and producing profit. For IT capacity and availability managers, though, the devil is in the details. It only takes one faulty component to knock out a service. Keep track and keep the lights on.

    Insight 2

    Ask what the business is working on, not what they need.

    If you ask them what they need, they’ll tell you – and it won’t be cheap. Find out what they’re going to do, and use your expertise to service those needs. Use your IT experience to estimate the impact of business and service level changes on the components that secure the availability you need.

    Insight 3

    Cloud shmoud.

    The role of the capacity manager might be changing with the advent of the public cloud, but it has not disappeared. Capacity managers in the age of the cloud are responsible for managing vendor relationships, negotiating external SLAs, projecting costs and securing budgets, reining in prodigal divisions, and so on.

    Summary of accomplishment

    Knowledge Gained

    • Impact of downtime on the organization
    • Gold systems
    • Key dependencies and sub-components
    • Strategy for monitoring components
    • Strategy for soliciting business needs
    • Projected capacity needs
    • Availability and capacity risks and mitigations

    Processes Optimized

    • Availability management
    • Capacity management

    Deliverables Completed

    • Business Impact Analysis
    • Capacity Plan Template

    Project step summary

    Client Project: Develop an Availability and Capacity Management Plan

    1. Conduct a business impact analysis
    2. Assign criticality ratings to services
    3. Define your monitoring strategy
    4. Implement your monitoring tool/aggregator
    5. Solicit business needs and gather data
    6. Analyze data and project future needs
    7. Identify and mitigate risks

    Info-Tech Insight

    This project has the ability to fit the following formats:

    • Onsite workshop by Info-Tech Research Group consulting analysts.
    • Do-it-yourself with your team.
    • Remote delivery via Info-Tech Guided Implementation.

    Research contributors and experts

    The image contains a picture of Adrian Blant.

    Adrian Blant, Independent Capacity Consultant, IT Capability Solutions

    Adrian has over 15 years' experience in IT infrastructure. He has built capacity management business processes from the ground up, and focused on ensuring a productive dialogue between IT and the business.

    The image contains a picture of James Zhang.

    James Zhang, Senior Manager Disaster Recovery, AIG Technology

    James has over 20 years' experience in IT and 10 years' experience in capacity management. Throughout his career, he has focused on creating new business processes to deliver value and increase efficiency over the long term.

    The image contains a picture of Mayank Banerjee.

    Mayank Banerjee, CTO, Global Supply Chain Management, HelloFresh

    Mayank has over 15 years' experience across a wide range of technologies and industries. He has implemented highly automated capacity management processes as part of his role of owning and solving end-to-end business problems.

    The image contains a picture of Mike Lynch

    Mike Lynch, Consultant, CapacityIQ

    Mike has over 20 years' experience in IT infrastructure. He takes a holistic approach to capacity management to identify and solve key problems, and has developed automated processes for mapping performance data to information that can inform business decisions.

    The image contains a picture of Paul Waguespack.

    Paul Waguespack, Manager of Application Systems Engineering, Tufts Health Plan

    Paul has over 10 years' experience in IT. He has specialized in implementing new applications and functionalities throughout their entire lifecycle, and integrating with all aspects of IT operations.

    The image contains a picture of Richie Mendoza.

    Richie Mendoza, IT Consultant, SMITS Inc.

    Richie has over 10 years' experience in IT infrastructure. He has specialized in using demand forecasting to guide infrastructure capacity purchasing decisions, to provide availability while avoiding costly overprovisioning.

    The image contains a picture of Rob Thompson.

    Rob Thompson, President, IT Tools & Process

    Rob has over 30 years’ IT experience. Throughout his career he has focused on making IT a generator of business value. He now runs a boutique consulting firm.

    Todd Evans, Capacity and Performance Management SME, IBM

    Todd has over 20 years' experience in capacity and performance management. At Kaiser Permanente, he established a well-defined mapping of the businesses workflow processes to technical requirements for applications and infrastructure.

    Bibliography

    451 Research. “Best of both worlds: Can enterprises achieve both scalability and control when it comes to cloud?” 451 Research, November 2016. Web.

    Allen, Katie. “Work Also Shrinks to Fit the Time Available: And We Can Prove It.” The Guardian. 25 Oct. 2017.

    Amazon. “Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud.” Amazon Web Services. N.d. Web.

    Armandpour, Tim. “Lies Vendors Tell about Service Level Agreements and How to Negotiate for Something Better.” Network World. 12 Jan 2016.

    “Availability Management.” ITIL and ITSM World. 2001. Web.

    Availability Management Plan Template. Purple Griffon. 30 Nov. 2012. Web.

    Bairi, Jayachandra, B., Murali Manohar, and Goutam Kumar Kundu. “Capacity and Availability Management by Quantitative Project Management in the IT Service Industry.” Asian Journal on Quality 13.2 (2012): 163-76. Web.

    BMC Capacity Optimization. BMC. 24 Oct 2017. Web.

    Brooks, Peter, and Christa Landsberg. Capacity Management in Today’s IT Environment. MentPro. 16 Aug 2017. Web.

    "Capacity and Availability Management." CMMI Institute. April 2017. Web.

    Capacity and Availability Management. IT Quality Group Switzerland. 24 Oct. 2017. Web.

    Capacity and Performance Management: Best Practices White Paper. Cisco. 4 Oct. 2005. Web.

    "Capacity Management." Techopedia.

    “Capacity Management Forecasting Best Practices and Recommendations.” STG. 26 Jan 2015. Web.

    Capacity Management from the Ground up. Metron. 24 Oct. 2017. Web.

    Capacity Management in the Modern Datacenter. Turbonomic. 25 Oct. 2017. Web.

    Capacity Management Maturity Assessing and Improving the Effectiveness. Metron. 24 Oct. 2017. Web.

    “Capacity Management Software.” TeamQuest. 24 Oct 2017. Web,

    Capacity Plan Template. Purainfo. 11 Oct 2012. Web.

    “Capacity Planner—Job Description.” Automotive Industrial Partnership. 24 Oct. 2017. Web.

    Capacity Planning. CDC. Web. Aug. 2017.

    "Capacity Planning." TechTarget. 24 Oct 2017. Web.

    “Capacity Planning and Management.” BMC. 24 Oct 2017. Web.

    "Checklist Capacity Plan." IT Process Wiki. 24 Oct. 2017. Web.

    Dykes, Brent. “Actionable Insights: The Missing Link Between Data and Business Value.” Forbes. April 26, 2016. Web.

    Evolved Capacity Management. CA Technologies. Oct. 2013. Web.

    Francis, Ryan. “False positives still cause threat alert fatigue.” CSO. May 3, 2017. Web.

    Frymire, Scott. "Capacity Planning vs. Capacity Analytics." ScienceLogic. 24 Oct. 2017. Web.

    Glossary. Exin. Aug. 2017. Web.

    Herrera, Michael. “Four Types of Risk Mitigation and BCM Governance, Risk and Compliance.” MHA Consulting. May 17, 2013.

    Hill, Jon. How to Do Capacity Planning. TeamQuest. 24 Oct. 2017. Web.

    “How to Create an SLA in 7 Easy Steps.” ITSM Perfection. 25 Oct. 2017. Web.

    Hunter, John. “Myth: If You Can’t Measure It: You Can’t Manage It.” W. Edwards Deming Institute Blog. 13 Aug 2015. Web.

    IT Service Criticality. U of Bristol. 24 Oct. 2017. Web.

    "ITIL Capacity Management." BMC's Complete Guide to ITIL. BMC Software. 22 Dec. 2016. Web.

    “Just-in-time.” The Economist. 6 Jul 2009. Web.

    Kalm, Denise P., and Marv Waschke. Capacity Management: A CA Service Management Process Map. CA. 24 Oct. 2017. Web.

    Klimek, Peter, Rudolf Hanel, and Stefan Thurner. “Parkinson’s Law Quantified: Three Investigations in Bureaucratic Inefficiency.” Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 3 (2009): 1-13. Aug. 2017. Web.

    Landgrave, Tim. "Plan for Effective Capacity and Availability Management in New Systems." TechRepublic. 10 Oct. 2002. Web.

    Longoria, Gina. “Hewlett Packard Enterprise Goes After Amazon Public Cloud in Enterprise Storage.” Forbes. 2 Dec. 2016. Web.

    Maheshwari, Umesh. “Understanding Storage Capacity.” NimbleStorage. 7 Jan. 2016. Web.

    Mappic, Sandy. “Just how complex can a Login Transaction be? Answer: Very!” Appdynamics. Dec. 11 2011. Web.

    Miller, Ron. “AWS Fires Back at Larry Ellison’s Claims, Saying It’s Just Larry Being Larry.” Tech Crunch. 2 Oct. 2017. Web.

    National College for Teaching & Leadership. “The role of data in measuring school performance.” National College for Teaching & Leadership. N.d. Web,

    Newland, Chris, et al. Enterprise Capacity Management. CETI, Ohio State U. 24 Oct. 2017. Web.

    Office of Government Commerce . Best Practice for Service Delivery. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 2001.

    Office of Government Commerce. Best Practice for Business Perspective: The IS View on Delivering Services to the Business. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 2004.

    Parkinson, C. Northcote. “Parkinson’s Law.” The Economist. 19 Nov. 1955. Web.

    “Parkinson’s Law Is Proven Again.” Financial Times. 25 Oct. 2017. Web.

    Paul, John, and Chris Hayes. Performance Monitoring and Capacity Planning. VM Ware. 2006. Web.

    “Reliability and Validity.” UC Davis. N.d. Web.

    "Role: Capacity Manager." IBM. 2008. Web.

    Ryan, Liz. “‘If You Can’t Measure It, You Can’t Manage It’: Not True.” Forbes. 10 Feb. 2014. Web.

    S, Lalit. “Using Flexible Capacity to Lower and Manage On-Premises TCO.” HPE. 23 Nov. 2016. Web.

    Snedeker, Ben. “The Pros and Cons of Public and Private Clouds for Small Business.” Infusionsoft. September 6, 2017. Web.

    Statement of Work: IBM Enterprise Availability Management Service. IBM. Jan 2016. Web.

    “The Road to Perfect AWS Reserved Instance Planning & Management in a Nutshell.” Botmetric. 25 Oct. 2017. Web.

    Transforming the Information Infrastructure: Build, Manage, Optimize. Asigra. Aug. 2017. Web.

    Valentic, Branimir. "Three Faces of Capacity Management." ITIL/ISO 20000 Knowledge Base. Advisera. 24 Oct. 2017. Web.

    "Unify IT Performance Monitoring and Optimization." IDERA. 24 Oct. 2017. Web.

    "What is IT Capacity Management?" Villanova U. Aug. 2017. Web.

    Wolstenholme, Andrew. Final internal Audit Report: IT Availability and Capacity (IA 13 519/F). Transport For London. 23 Feb. 2015. Web.

    Select the Optimal Disaster Recovery Deployment Model

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}413|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 8.8/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $10,247 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 11 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: DR and Business Continuity
    • Parent Category Link: /business-continuity
    • DR deployment has many possibilities. It becomes overwhelming and difficult to sift through all of the options and understand what makes sense for your organization.
    • The combination of high switching costs and the pressure to move applications to cloud leaves managers overwhelmed and complacent with their current DR model.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    1. Cut to the chase and evaluate the feasibility of cloud first. Gauge your organization’s current capabilities for DR in the cloud before becoming infatuated with the idea.
    2. A mixed model gives you the best of both worlds. Diversify your strategy by identifying fit for purpose and balancing the work required to maintain various models.
    3. Begin with the end in mind. Commit to mastering the selected model and leverage your vendor relationship for effective DR.

    Impact and Result

    • By efficiently eliminating models that are not suited for your organization and narrowing the scope of DR deployment possibilities, you spend more time focusing on what works rather than what doesn’t.
    • Taking a funneled approach ensures that you are not wasting time evaluating application-level considerations when organizational constraints prevent you from moving forward.
    • Comparing the total cost of ownership among candidate models helps demonstrate to the business the reason behind choosing one method over another.

    Select the Optimal Disaster Recovery Deployment Model Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should build the optimal DR deployment model, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Target the relevant DR options for your organization

    Complete Phase 1 to outline your DR site requirements, review any industry or organizational constraints on your DR strategy, and zero in on relevant DR models.

    • Select the Optimal Disaster Recovery Deployment Model – Phase 1: Target Relevant DR Options for Your Organization
    • DR Decision Tree (Visio)
    • DR Decision Tree (PDF)
    • Application Assessment Tool for Cloud DR

    2. Conduct a comprehensive analysis and vet the DR vendors

    Complete Phase 2 to explore possibilities of deployment models, conduct a TCO comparison analysis, and select the best-fit model.

    • Select the Optimal Disaster Recovery Deployment Model – Phase 2: Conduct a Comprehensive Analysis and Vet the DR Vendors
    • DR Solution TCO Comparison Tool

    3. Make the case and plan your transition

    Complete Phase 3 to assess outsourcing best practices, address implementation considerations, and build an executive presentation for business stakeholders.

    • Select the Optimal Disaster Recovery Deployment Model – Phase 3: Make the Case and Plan Your Transition
    • DR Solution Executive Presentation Template
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Select the Optimal Disaster Recovery Deployment Model

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Target Relevant DR Options for Your Organization

    The Purpose

    Identify potential DR models

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Take a funneled approach and avoid getting lost among all of the DR models available

    Activities

    1.1 Define DR site requirements

    1.2 Document industry and organizational constraints

    1.3 Identify potential DR models

    Outputs

    Determine the type of site, replication, and risk mitigation initiatives required

    Rule out unfit models

    DR Decision Tree

    Application Assessment Tool for Cloud DR

    2 Conduct a Comprehensive Analysis of Appropriate Models

    The Purpose

    Explore relevant DR models

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Develop supporting evidence for the various options

    Activities

    2.1 Explore pros and cons of potential solutions

    2.2 Understand the use case for DRaaS

    2.3 Review DR model diagrams

    Outputs

    Qualitative analysis on candidate models

    Evaluate the need for DRaaS

    DR diagrams for candidate models

    3 Build the DR Solution TCO Comparison Tool

    The Purpose

    Determine best cost models

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Save money by selecting the most cost effective option to meet your DR requirements

    Activities

    3.1 Gather hardware requirements for production site

    3.2 Define capacity requirements for DR

    3.3 Compare cost across various models

    Outputs

    Populate the production summary tab in TCO tool

    Understand how much hardware will need to be on standby and how much will be procured at the time of disaster

    Find the most cost effective method

    4 Make the Case and Plan Your Transition

    The Purpose

    Build support from business stakeholders by having a clear and defendable proposal for DR

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Effective and ready DR deployment model

    Activities

    4.1 Address implementation considerations for network, capacity, and day-to-day operations

    4.2 Build presentation for business stakeholders

    Outputs

    Define implementation projects necessary for deployment and appoint staff to execute them

    PowerPoint presentation to summarize findings from the course of the project

    Enterprise Storage Solution Considerations

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}507|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Storage & Backup Optimization
    • Parent Category Link: /storage-and-backup-optimization
    • Enterprise storage technology and options are challenging to understand.
    • There are so many options. How do you decide what the best solution is for your storage challenge??
    • Where do you start when trying to solve your enterprise storage challenge?

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Take the time to understand the various data storage formats, disk types, and associated technology, as well as the cloud-based and on-premises options. This will help you select the right tool for your needs.

    Impact and Result

    Look to existing use cases based on actual Info-Tech analyst calls to help in your decision-making process.

    Enterprise Storage Solution Considerations Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Enterprise Storage Solution Considerations – Narrow your focus with the right product type and realize efficiencies.

    Explore the building blocks of enterprise storage so you can select the best solution, narrow your focus with the correct product type, explore the features that should be considered when evaluating enterprise storage offerings, and examine use cases based on actual Info-Tech analyst calls to find a storage solution for your situation.

    • Enterprise Storage Solution Considerations Storyboard

    2. Modernize Enterprise Storage Workbook – Understand your data requirements.

    The first step in solving your enterprise storage challenge is identifying your data sources, data volumes, and growth rates. This information will give you insight into what data sources could be stored on premises or in the cloud, how much storage you will require for the coming five to ten years, and what to consider when exploring enterprise storage solutions. This tool can be a valuable asset for determining your current storage drivers and future storage needs, structuring a plan for future storage purchases, and determining timelines and total cost of ownership.

    • Modernize Enterprise Storage Workbook
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Enterprise Storage Solution Considerations

    Narrow your focus with the right product type and realize efficiencies.

    Analyst Perspective

    The vendor landscape is continually evolving, as are the solutions they offer. The options and features are increasing and appealing.

    The image contains a picture of P.J. Ryan.

    To say that the current enterprise storage landscape looks interesting would be an understatement. The solutions offered by vendors continue to grow and evolve. Flash and NVMe are increasing the speed of storage media and reducing latency. Software-defined storage is finding the most efficient use of media to store data where it is best served while managing a variety of vendor storage and older storage area networks and network-attached storage devices.

    Storage as a service is taking on a new meaning with creative solutions that let you keep the storage appliance on premises or in a colocated data center while administration, management, and support are performed by the vendor for a nominal monthly fee.

    We cannot discuss enterprise storage without mentioning the cloud. Bring a thermometer because you must understand the difference between hot, warm, and cold storage when discussing the cloud options. Very hot and very cold may also come into play.

    Storage hardware can assume a higher total cost of ownership with support options that replace the controllers on a regular basis. The options with this type of service are also varied, but the concept of not having to replace all disks and chassis nor go through a data migration is very appealing to many companies.

    The cloud is growing in popularity when it comes to enterprise storage, but on-premises solutions are still in demand, and whether you choose cloud or on premises, you can be guaranteed an array of features and options to add stability, security, and efficiency to your enterprise storage.

    P.J. Ryan
    Research Director, Infrastructure & Operations
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Info-Tech Insight

    The vendor landscape is continually evolving, as are the solutions they offer.

    Storage providers are getting acquired by bigger players, “outside the box” thinking is disrupting the storage support marketplace, “as a service” storage offerings are evolving, and what is a data lake and do I need one? The traditional storage vendors are not alone in the market, and the solutions they offer are no longer traditional either. Explore the landscape and understand your options before you make any enterprise storage solution purchases.

    Understand the building blocks of storage so you can select the best solution.

    There are multiple storage formats for data, along with multiple hardware form factors and disk types to hold those various data formats. Software plays a significant role in many of these storage solutions, and cloud offerings take advantage of all the various formats, form factors, and disks. The challenge is matching your data type with the correct storage format and solution.

    Look to existing use cases to help in your decision-making process.

    Explore previous experiences from others by reading use cases to determine what the best solution is for your challenge. You’re probably not the first to encounter the challenge you’re facing. Another organization may have previously reached out for assistance and found a viable solution that may be just what you also need.

    Enterprise storage has evolved, with more options than ever

    Data is growing, data security will always be a concern, and vendors are providing more and more options for enterprise storage.

    “By 2025, it’s estimated that 463 exabytes of data will be created each day globally – that’s the equivalent of 212,765,957 DVDs per day!” (Visual Capitalist)

    “Modern criminal groups target not only endpoints and servers, but also central storage systems and their backup infrastructure.” (Continuity Software)

    Cloud or on premises? Maybe a hybrid approach with both cloud and on premises is best for you. Do you want to remove the headaches of storage administration, management, and support with a fully managed storage-as-a-service solution? Would you like to upgrade your controllers every three or four years without a major service interruption? The options are increasing and appealing.

    High-Level Considerations

    1. Understand Your Data

    Understand how much data you have and where it is located. This will be crucial when evaluating enterprise storage solutions.

    2. Plan for Growth

    Your enterprise storage considerations should include your data needs now and in the future.

    3. Understand the Mechanics

    Take the time to understand the various data storage formats, disk types, and associated technology, as well as the cloud-based and on-premises options. This will help you select the right tool for your needs.

    Storage formats, disk drives, and technology

    Common data storage formats, technology, and drive types are outlined below. Understanding how data is stored as well as the core building blocks for larger systems will help you decide which solution is best for your storage needs.

    Format

    What it is

    Disk Drives and Technology

    File Storage

    File storage is hierarchical storage that uses files, folders, subfolders, and directories. You enter a specific filename and path to access the file, such as P:\users\johndoe\strategy\cloud.doc. If you ever saved a file on a server, you used file storage. File storage is usually managed by some type of file manager, such as File Explorer in Windows. Network-attached storage (NAS) devices use file storage.

    Hard Disk Drives (HDD)

    HDD use a platter of spinning disks to magnetically store data. The disks are thick enough to make them rigid and are referred to as hard disks.

    HDD is older technology but is still in demand and offered by vendors.

    Object Storage

    Object storage is when data is broken into distinct units, called objects. These objects are stored in a flat, non-hierarchical structure in a single location or repository. Each object is identified by its associated ID and metadata. Objects are accessed by an application programming interface (API).

    Flash

    Flash storage uses flash memory chips to store data. The flash memory chips are written with electricity and contain no moving parts. Flash storage is very fast, which is how the technology got its name (“Flash vs. SSD Storage,” Enterprise Storage Forum, 2018).

    Block Storage

    Block storage is when data is divided up into fixed-size blocks and stored with a unique identifier. Blocks can be stored in different environments, such as Windows or Linux. Storage area networks (SANs) use block storage.

    Solid-State Drive (SSD)

    SSD is a storage mechanism that also does not use any moving parts. Most SSD drives use flash storage, but other options are available for SSD.

    Nonvolatile Memory Express (NVMe)

    NVMe is a communications standard developed specially for SSDs by a consortium of vendors including Intel, Samsung, SanDisk, Dell, and Seagate. It operates across the PCIe bus (hence the “Express” in the name), which allows the drives to act more like the fast memory that they are rather than the hard disks they imitate (PCWorld).

    Narrow your focus with the right product type

    On-premises enterprise storage solutions fit into a few distinct product types.

    Network-Attached Storage

    Storage Area Network

    Software-Defined Storage

    Hyperconverged Infrastructure

    NAS refers to a storage device that is connected directly to your network. Any user or device with access to your network can access the available storage provided by the NAS. NAS storage is easily scalable and can add data redundancy through RAID technology. NAS uses the file storage format.

    NAS storage may or may not be the first choice in terms of enterprise storage, but it does have a solid market appeal as an on-premises primary backup storage solution.

    A SAN is a dedicated network of pooled storage devices. The dedicated network, separate from the regular network, provides high speed and scalability without concern for the regular network traffic. SANs use block storage format and can be divided into logical units that can be shared between servers or segregated from other servers. SANs can be accessed by multiple servers and systems at the same time. SANs are scalable and offer high availability and redundancy through RAID technology.

    SANs can use a variety of disk types and sizes and are quite common among on-premises storage solutions.

    “Software-defined storage (SDS) is a storage architecture that separates storage software from its hardware. Unlike traditional network-attached storage (NAS) or storage area network (SAN) systems, SDS is generally designed to perform on any industry-standard or x86 system, removing the software’s dependence on proprietary hardware.” (RedHat)

    SDS uses software-based policies and rules to grow and protect storage attached to applications.

    SDS allows you to use server-based storage products to add management, protection, and better usage.

    Hyperconverged storage uses virtualization and software-defined storage to combine the storage, compute, and network resources along with a hypervisor into one appliance.

    Hyperconverged storage can scale out by adding more nodes or appliances, but scaling up, or adding more resources to each appliance, can have limitations. There is flexibility as hyperconverged storage can work with most network and compute manufacturers.

    Cloud storage

    • Cloud storage is online storage offered by a cloud provider. Cloud storage is available almost anywhere and is set up with high availability features such as data duplication, redundancy, backup, and power failure protection.
    • Cloud storage is very scalable and typically is offered as object storage, block storage, or file storage. Cloud storage vendors may have their own naming scheme for object, block, or file storage.
    • Cloud-hosted data is marketed according to the frequency of access and length of time in storage. There are typically three main levels of storage: hot, warm, or cold. Vendors may have their own naming convention for hot, warm, and cold storage. Some may also add more layers such as very hot or very cold.
      • Hot storage is for data that is frequently accessed and modified. It is available on demand and is the most costly of the storage levels.
      • Cold storage is for data that will sit for a long period of time and not need to be accessed. Cold storage is usually only available after several hours or days. Cold storage is very low cost and, in some cases, even free, but retrieval or restoration for the free services can be costly.
      • Warm storage sits in between hot and cold storage. It is for data that is infrequently needed. The cost of warm storage is also in between hot and cold storage costs, and access times are measured in terms of minutes or hours.
      • It is not uncommon for data to start in hot storage and, as it ages, move to warm and eventually cold storage.

    “Enterprise cloud storage offers nearly unlimited scalability. Enterprises can add storage quickly and easily as it is needed, eliminating the risk and cost of over-provisioning.”

    – Spectrum Enterprise

    “Hot data will operate on fresh data. Cold data will operate on less frequent data and [is] used mainly for reporting and planning. Warm data is a balance between the two.”

    – TechBlost

    Enterprise storage features

    The features listed below, while not intended to cover all features offered by all vendors, should be considered and could act as a baseline for discussions with storage providers when evaluating enterprise storage offerings.

    • Scalability
      • What are the options to expand, and how easy or difficult it is to expand capacity in the future?
    • Security
      • Does the solution offer data encryption options as well as ransomware protections?
    • Integration options
      • Can the solution support seamless connectivity with other solutions and applications, such as cloud-based storage or backup software?
    • Storage reduction
      • Does the solution offer space-reduction options such as deduplication or data compression?
    • Replication
      • Does the solution offer replication options such as device to device on premises, device to device when geographically separated, device to cloud, or a combination of these scenarios?
    • Performance
      • “Enterprise storage systems have two main ‘speed’ measurements: throughput and IOPS. Throughput is the data transfer rate to and from storage media, measured in bytes per second; IOPS measures the number of reads and writes – input/output (I/O) operations – per second.” (Computer Weekly)
    • Protocol support
      • Does the solution support object-based, block-based, and file-based storage protocols?
    • Storage Efficiency
      • How efficient is the solution? Can they prove it?
      • Storage efficiencies must be available and baselined.
    • Management platform
      • A management/reporting platform should be a component included in the system.
    • Multi-parity
      • Does the solution offer multi-level block “parity” for RAID 6 protection equivalency, which would allow for the simultaneous failure of two disks?
    • Proactive support
      • Features such as call home, dial in, or remote support must be available on the system.
    • Financial considerations
      • The cost is always a concern, but are there subscription-based or “as-a-service” options?
      • Internally, is it better for this expenditure to be a capital expenditure or an ongoing operating expense?

    What’s new in enterprise storage

    • Data warehouses are not a new concept, but the data storage evolution and growth of data means that data lakes and data lakehouses are growing in popularity.
      • “A data lake is a centralized repository that allows you to store all your structured and unstructured data at any scale. You can store your data as-is, without having to first structure the data” (Amazon Web Services).
      • Analytics with a data lake is possible, but manipulation of the data is hindered due to the nature of the data. A data lakehouse adds data management and analytics to a data lake, similar to the data warehouse functionality added to databases.
    • Options for on-premises hardware support is changing.
      • Pure Storage was the first to shake up the SAN support model with its Evergreen support option. Evergreen//Forever support allows for storage controller upgrades without having to migrate data or replace your disks or chassis (Pure Storage).
      • In response to the Pure Storage Evergreen offering, Dell, HPE, NetApp, and others have come out with similar programs that offer controller upgrades while maintaining the data, disks, and chassis.
    • “As a service” is available as a hybrid solution.
      • Storage as a service (STaaS) originally referred to hosted, fully cloud-based offerings without the need for any on-premises hardware.
      • The latest STaaS offerings provide on-premises or colocated hardware with pay-as-you-go subscription pricing for data consumption. Administration, management, and support are included. The vendor will supply support and manage everything on your behalf.
      • Most of the major storage vendors offer a variation of storage as a service.

    “Because data lakes mostly consist of raw unprocessed data, a data scientist with specialized expertise is typically needed to manipulate and translate the data.”

    – DevIQ

    “A Lakehouse is also a type of centralized data repository, integrated from heterogeneous sources. As can be expected from its name, It shares features with both datawarehouses and data lakes.”

    – Cesare

    “Storage as a service (STaaS) eliminates Capex, simplifies management and offers extensive flexibility.”

    – TechTarget

    Major vendors

    The current vendor landscape for enterprise storage solutions represents a range of industry veterans and the brands they’ve aggregated along the way, as well as some relative newcomers who have come to the forefront within the past ten years.

    Vendors like Dell EMC and HPE are longstanding veterans of storage appliances with established offerings and a back catalogue of acquisitions fueling their growth. Others such as Pure Storage offer creative solutions like all-flash arrays, which are becoming more and more appealing as flash storage becomes more commoditized.

    Cloud-based vendors have become popular options in recent years. Cloud storage provides many options and has attracted many other vendors to provide a cloud option in addition to their on-premises solutions. Some software and hardware vendors also partner with cloud vendors to offer a complete solution that includes storage.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Explore your current vendor’s solutions as a starting point, then use that understanding as a reference point to dive into other players in the market

    Key Players

    • Amazon
    • Cisco
    • Dell EMC
    • Google
    • Hewlett Packard Enterprise
    • Hitachi Vantara
    • IBM
    • Microsoft
    • NetApp
    • Nutanix
    • Pure Storage

    Enterprise Storage Use Cases

    Block, object, or file storage? NAS, SAN, SDS, or HCI? Cloud or on prem? Hot, warm, or cold?
    Which one do you choose?
    The following use cases based on actual Info-Tech analyst calls may help you decide.

    1. Offsite backup solution
    2. Infrastructure consolidation
    3. DR/BCP datacenter duplication
    4. Expansion of existing storage
    5. Complete backup solution
    6. Existing storage solution going out of support soon
    7. Video storage
    8. Classify and offload storage

    Offsite backup solution

    “Offsite” may make you think of geographical separation or even cloud-based storage, but what is the best option and why?

    Use Case: How a manufacturing company dealt with retired applications

    • A leading manufacturing company had to preserve older applications no longer in use.
    • The company had completed several acquisitions and ended up with multiple legacy applications that had been merged or migrated into replacement solutions. These legacy applications were very important to the original companies, and although the data they held had been migrated to a replacement solution, executives felt they should hold on to these applications for a period of time, just in case.
    • A modern archiving solution was considered, but a research advisor from Info-Tech Research joined a call with the manufacturing company and helped the client realize that the solution was a modified backup. The application data had already been preserved through the migration, so data could be accessed in the production environment.
    • The data could be exported from the legacy application into a nonsequential database, compressed, and stored in cloud-based cold storage for less than $5 per terabyte per month. The manufacturing company staff realized that they could apply this same approach to several of their legacy applications and save tens of thousands of dollars in the process.
    • Cold storage is inexpensive until you start retrieving that data frequently. The manufacturing company knew they did not have a requirement to retrieve the application and data for a very long time, so cloud-based cold storage was ideal.

    “Data retrieval from cold storage is harder and slower than it is from hot storage. … Because of the longer retrieval time, online cold storage plans are often much cheaper. … The downside is that you’d incur additional costs when retrieving the data.”

    – Ben Stockton, Cloudwards

    Infrastructure consolidation

    Hyperconverged infrastructure combines storage, virtual infrastructure, and associated management into one piece of equipment.

    Use Case: How one company dealt with equipment and storage needs

    • One Info-Tech client had recently started in the role of IT director and realized he had inherited aging infrastructure along with a serious data challenge. The storage appliances were old and out of support. The appliances were performing inadequately, and the client was in need of more data due to ongoing growth, but he also realized that the virtual environment was running on very old servers that were no longer supported. The IT director reached out to Info-Tech to find solutions to the virtualization challenge, but the storage problem also came up throughout the course of the conversation with an analyst.
    • The analyst quickly realized that the IT director was an ideal candidate for a hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) storage solution, which would also provide the necessary virtual environment.
    • The analyst explained the benefits of having a single appliance that would provide virtualization needs as well as storage needs. The built-in management features would ease the burden of administration, and the software-defined nature of the HCI would allow for the migration of data as well as future expansion options.
    • Hyperconverged infrastructure is offered by many vendors under a variety of names. Most are similar but some may have a better interface or other features. The expansion process is simple, and HCI is a good fit for many organizations looking to consolidate virtual infrastructure and storage.

    “HCI environments use a hypervisor, usually running on a server that uses direct-attached storage (DAS), to create a data center pool of systems and resources.”

    – Samuel Greengard, Datamation

    Datacenter duplication

    SAN providers offer a varied range of options for their products, and those options are constantly evolving.

    Use Case: Independent school district provides better data access using SAN technology

    • An independent school district was expanding by adding a second data center in a new school. This new data center would be approximately 20 miles away from the original data center used by the district. The intent was not to replace the original data center but to use both centers to store data and provide services concurrently. The district’s ideal scenario would be that users would not know or care which data center they were reaching, and there would be no difference in the service received from each data center. The school district reached out to Info-Tech when planning discussions reached the topic of data duplication and replication software.
    • An Info-Tech analyst joined a call with the school district and guided the conversation toward the existing environment to understand what options might be available. The analyst quickly discovered that all the district’s servers were virtual, and all associated data was stored on a single SAN.
    • The analyst informed the school district staff about SAN options, including SAN-to-SAN replication. If the school district had a sufficient link between the two data centers, SAN-to-SAN replication would work for them and provide the two identical copies of data at two locations.
    • The analyst continued to offer explanations of other features that some vendors offer with their SANs, such as the ability to turn on or off deduplication and compression, as well as disk options such as flash or NVMe.
    • The school district was moving to the request for proposal (RFP) stage but hoped to have SAN-to-SAN replication implemented before the next academic year started.

    “SAN-to-SAN replication is a low-cost, highly efficient way to manage mounting quantities of stored data.”

    – Secure Infrastructure & Services

    Expansion of existing storage

    That old storage area network may still have some useful life left in it.

    Use Case: Municipality solves data storage aging and growth challenge

    • A municipality in the United States reached out to Info-Tech for guidance on its storage challenge. The municipality had accumulated multiple SANs from different vendors over the years. These SANs were running out of storage, and more data storage was needed. The municipality’s data was growing at a rapid pace, thanks to municipal growth and expansion of services. The IT team was also concerned with modernizing their storage and not hindering their long-term growth by making the wrong purchase decision for their current storage needs.
    • An analyst from Info-Tech discussed several options with the municipality but in the end advised that software-defined storage may be the best solution.
    • Software-defined storage (SDS) would allow the municipality to gain better visibility into existing storage while making more efficient use of existing and new storage. SDS could take over the management of the existing storage from multiple vendors and add additional storage as required. SDS would also be able to integrate cloud-based storage if that was the direction taken by the municipality in the future.
    • The municipality moved forward with an SDS solution and added some additional storage capacity. They used some of their existing SANs but retired the more troublesome ones. The SDS system managed all the storage instances and data management. The administration of the storage environment was easier for the storage admins, and long-term savings were achieved through better storage management.

    “Often enterprises have added storage on an ad hoc basis as they needed it for various applications. That can result in a mishmash of heterogenous storage hardware from a wide variety of vendors. SDS offers the ability to unify management of these different storage devices, allowing IT to be more efficient.”

    – Cynthia Harvey, Enterprise Storage Forum (“What Is Software Defined Storage?”, 2018)

    Complete backup solution

    Many backup software solutions can provide backups to multiple locations, making two-location backups simple.

    Use Case: How an oil refinery modernized its backup solution

    • A large oil refinery needed a better solution for the storage of backups. The refinery was replacing its backup software solution but also wanted to improve the backup storage situation and move away from tape-based storage. All other infrastructure was reasonably modern and not in need of replacement at this time.
    • A research analyst from Info-Tech helped the client realize that the solution was a modified backup. The general guidance for backups is have a least one copy offsite, so the cloud was the obvious focal point. The analyst also explained that it would be beneficial to have a recent copy of the backup available on site for common restoration requests in addition to having the offsite copy for disaster recovery (DR) purposes.
    • The refinery staff conducted a data analysis to determine how much data was being backed up on a daily basis. The solution proposed by the analyst included network-attached storage (NAS) with adequate storage to hold 30 days' worth of on-premises data. The backup software would also simultaneously copy each backup to a cloud-based storage repository. The backup software was smart enough to only back up and transfer data that had changed since the previous backup, so transfer time and capacity was not a factor.
    • The NAS would allow for the restoration of any local, on-premises data while the cloud storage would provide a safe location offsite for backup data. It could also serve as the backup location for other cloud-based services that required a backup.

    “Data protection demands that enterprises have multiple methods of keeping data safe and replicating it in case of disaster or loss.”

    – Drew Robb, Enterprise Storage Forum, 2021

    Storage going out of support

    SAN solutions have come a long way with improvements in how data is stored and what is used to store the data.

    Use Case: How one organization replaced its old storage with a similar solution

    • A government organization was looking for a solution for its aging storage area network appliances. The SANs were old and would be no longer supported by the manufacturer within four months. The SANs had slower spinning disks and their individual capacity was at its limit through the addition of extra shelves and disks over the years.
    • The organization reached out to Info-Tech for guidance. An analyst arranged a call with them, and they discussed the storage situation in detail, including desired benefits from a storage solution and growth requirements. They also discussed cloud storage, but the government organization was not in a position to move its data to the cloud for a variety of reasons.
    • Although the individual SANs were at their storage capacity limit, the total amount of data was well within the limits of many modern on-premises storage solutions. SSD and flash or NVMe storage can store large amounts of data in small footprints and form factors.
    • The analyst reviewed several vendors with the client and discussed some advantages and disadvantages of each. They explored the features offered as well as scalability options.
    • SANs have been around for a long time but the features and capabilities that come with them has evolved. They are still a very viable solution for many organizations in a variety of scenarios.

    “A rapidly growing portion of SAN deployments leverages all-flash storage to gain its high performance, consistent low latency, and lower total cost when compared to spinning disk.”

    – NetApp

    Video storage

    Cloud storage would not be sufficient if you were using a dial up connection, just as on-premises storage solutions would not suffice if they were using floppy disks.

    Use Case: Body cams and public cameras in municipalities are driving storage growth

    • Municipal law enforcement agencies are wearing body cameras more frequently, for their own protection as well as for the protection of the public. Camera footage can be useful in legal situations as well. Municipalities are also installing more and more public cameras for the purposes of public safety. The recorded video footage from these cameras can result in large data files, which in turn drive data storage requirements.
    • Info-Tech analysts are joining calls about video data storage with increasing frequency. The concerns are repetitive, and the guidance is similar on most of these calls.
    • The “object” storage format is ideal for video and media data. Most cloud-based storage solutions use object storage, but it is also available with on-premises solutions such as NAS or SAN. The challenges clients are expressing are typically related to inadequate bandwidth for cloud-based storage or other storage formats instead of “object” storage. Cloud-based storage can also grow beyond the budgeted numbers, causing an increase in the monthly cloud cost. Older, slower on-premises hardware sometimes reveals itself as the latency culprit.
    • Object storage is well suited for the unstructured data that is video footage. It uses metadata to tag the video file for future retrieval and is easily expandable, which also makes it cost effective.
    • Video data stored in a cloud-based repository will work fine as long as the bandwidth is adequate. On-premises storage of video data is also quite adequate on the right storage format, with fast disks and a reasonably up-to-date network infrastructure.

    “The captured video is stored for days, weeks, months and sometimes years and consumes a lot of space. Data storage plays a new and important role in these systems. Object storage is ideal to store the video data.”

    – Object-Storage.Info

    Classify and offload primary storage

    Some software products have storage options available as a result of agreements with other storage vendors. Several backup and archive software products fall into this category.

    Use Case: Enterprise storage can help reduce data sprawl

    • A large engineering firm was trying to manage its data sprawl. The team sampled a small percentage of their data and quickly realized that when they applied their findings on the 1% of data to their entire data estate, the sheer volume of personal files, older files, and unclassified data was going to be a challenge.
    • They found a solution in archiving software. The archiving software would tag data based on several factors. The software would move older files away from primary storage to an alternate storage platform but still leave a stub of the moved file in place and maintain limited access to those files. This would reduce primary storage requirements and allow the firm to eliminate multiple file servers
    • The engineering firm reached out to Info-Tech and participated in an analyst call. During that call, they laid out their plans, and the analyst made them aware of cloud storage. The positive and negative aspects of cloud storage were discussed, and the firm fully understood that the colder the storage tier, the slower the recovery. The firm's stance was if the files had not been accessed in the past six months, waiting a day or two for retrieval would not be a concern, and the firm was content with cold storage in the cloud.
    • The firm had not purchased the archiving software at the time of the analyst call, and the analyst also explained to them that the archiving software may have an existing agreement with a cloud provider for storage options, which could be more cost effective than purchasing cloud storage separately.
    • Cold cloud-based storage was the preferred solution for this firm, but this use case also highlights the option that some software products carry regarding storage. Several backup and archive products have a cloud storage option that should be investigated, as they may be cost-effective options.

    “Cold storage is perfect for archiving your data. Online backup providers offer low-cost, off-site data backups at the expense of fast speeds and easy access, even though data retrieval often comes at an added cost. If you need to keep your data long-term, but don’t need to access it often, this is the kind of storage you need.”

    – Ben Stockton, Cloudwards

    Understand your data requirements

    Activity

    The first step in solving your enterprise storage challenge is identifying your data sources or drivers, data volume size, and growth rates. This information will give you insight into what data sources could be stored on premises or in the cloud, how much storage you will require for the coming five to ten years, and what to consider when exploring enterprise storage solutions.

    • Info-Tech’s Modernize Enterprise Storage Workbook can be a valuable asset for determining your current storage drivers and future storage needs, structuring a plan for future storage purchases, and determining timelines and total cost of ownership.
    • An example of the Storage Capacity Calculator tab from that workbook is displayed on the right. Using the Storage Capacity Requirements Calculator requires minimal steps.
    1. Enter the current date and planning timeline (horizon) in months
    2. Identify the top sources of data within the business – the current data drivers. Areas of focus could include business applications, file shares, backup, and archives.
    3. For each of these data drivers, include your best estimate of:
    • Current data volume
    • Growth rate
  • Identify the top future data drivers, such as new applications or initiatives that will result from current business plans and priorities, and record the following details:
    • Initial data volumes
    • Projected growth rates
    • Planned implementation date
  • The spreadsheet will automatically calculate the data volume at the planning horizon based on the growth rate.
  • Download the Modernize Enterprise Storage Workbook and take the first step toward understanding your data requirements.

    The image contains a screenshot of the Modernize Enterprise Storage Workbook.

    Download the Modernize Enterprise Storage Workbook

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Modernize Enterprise Storage

    Current and emerging storage technologies are disrupting the status quo – prepare your infrastructure for the exponential rise in data and its storage requirements.

    Modernize Enterprise Storage Workbook

    This workbook will complement the discussions and activities found in the Modernize Enterprise Storage blueprint. Use this workbook in conjunction with the blueprint to develop a strategy for storage modernization.

    Bibliography

    Bakkianathan, Raghunathan. “What is the difference between Hot Warm and Cold data storage?” TechBlost, n.d.. Accessed 14 July 2022.
    Cesare. “Data warehouse vs Data lake vs Lakehouse… and DeltaLake?“ Medium, 14 June 2021. Accessed 26 July 2022.
    Davison, Shawn and Ryan Sappenfield. “Data Lake Vs Lakehouse Vs Data Mesh: The Evolution of Data Transformation.” DevIQ, May 2022. Accessed 23 July 2022.
    Desjardins, Jeff. “Infographic: How Much Data is Generated Each Day?” Visual Capitalist, 15 April 2019. Accessed 26 July 2022.
    Greengard, Samuel. “Top 10 Hyperconverged Infrastructure (HCI) Solutions.” Datamation, 22 December 2020. Accessed 23 July 2022.
    Harvey, Cynthia. “Flash vs. SSD Storage: Is there a Difference?” Enterprise Storage Forum, 10 July 2018. Accessed 23 July 2022.
    Harvey, Cynthia. “What Is Software Defined Storage? Features & Benefits.” Enterprise Storage Forum, 22 February 2018. Accessed 23 July 2022.
    Hecht, Gil. “4 Predictions for storage and backup security in 2022.” Continuity Software, 09 January 2022. Accessed 22 July 2022.
    Jacobi, Jonl. “NVMe SSDs: Everything you need to know about this insanely fast storage.” PCWorld, 10 March 2019. Accessed 22 July 2022
    Pritchard, Stephen. “Briefing: Cloud storage performance metrics.” Computer Weekly, 16 July 2021. Accessed 23 July 2022
    Robb, Drew. “Best Enterprise Backup Software & Solutions 2022.” Enterprise Storage Forum, 09 April 2021. Accessed 23 July 2022.
    Sheldon, Robert. “On-premises STaaS shifts storage buying to Opex model.” TechTarget, 10 August 2020. Accessed 22 July 2022.
    “Simplify Your Storage Ownership, Forever.” PureStorage. Accessed 20 July 2022.
    Stockton, Ben. “Hot Storage vs Cold Storage in 2022: Instant Access vs Long-Term Archives.” Cloudwards, 29 September 2021. Accessed 22 July 2022.
    “The Cost Savings of SAN-to-SAN Replication.” Secure Infrastructure and Services, 31 March 2016. Accessed 16 July 2022.
    “Video Surveillance.” Object-Storage.Info, 18 December 2019. Accessed 25 July 2022.
    “What is a Data Lake?” Amazon Web Services, n.d. Accessed 17 July 2022.
    “What is enterprise cloud storage?” Spectrum Enterprise, n.d. Accessed 28 July 2022.
    “What is SAN (Storage Area Network).” NetApp, n.d. Accessed 25 July 2022.
    “What is software-defined storage?” RedHat, 08 March 2018. Accessed 16 July 2022.

    Renovate the Data Center

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}497|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Data Center & Facilities Optimization
    • Parent Category Link: /data-center-and-facilities-optimization
    • 33% of enterprises will be undertaking facility upgrades or refreshes in 2010 aimed at extending the life of their existing data centers.
    • Every upgrade or refresh targeting specific components in the facility to address short-term pain will have significant impact on the data center environment as a whole. Planning upfront and establishing a clear project scope will minimize expensive changes in later years.
    • This solution set will provide you with step-by-step design, planning, and selection tools to define a Data Center renovation plan to reduce cost and risk while supporting cost-effective long-term growth for power, cooling, standby power, and fire protection renovations.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • 88% of organizations cited they would spend more time and effort on documenting and identifying facility requirements for initial project scoping. Organizations can prevent scope creep by conducting the necessary project planning up front and identify requirements and the effect that the renovation project will have in all areas of the data center facility.
    • Data Center facilities renovations must include the specific requirements related to power provisioning, stand-by power, cooling, and fire protection - not just the immediate short-term pain.
    • 39% of organizations cited they would put more emphasis on monitoring contractor management and performance to improve the outcome of the data center renovation project.

    Impact and Result

    • Early internal efforts to create a budget and facility requirements yields better cost and project outcomes when construction begins. Each data center renovation project is unique and should have its own detailed budget.
    • Upfront planning and detailed project scoping can prevent a cascading impact on data center renovation projects to other areas of the data center that can increase project size, scope and spend.
    • Contractor selection is one of the most important first steps in a complex data center renovation. Organizations must ensure the contractor selected has experience specifically in data center renovation.

    Renovate the Data Center Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Identify and understand the renovation project.

    • Storyboard: Renovate the Data Center
    • None
    • Data Center Annual Review Checklist

    2. Renovate power in the data center.

    • Data Center Power Requirements Calculator

    3. Renovate cooling in the data center.

    • Data Center Cooling Requirements Calculator

    4. Renovate standby power in the data center.

    • Data Center Standby Power Requirements Calculator

    5. Define current and future fire protection requirements.

    • Fire Protection & Suppression Engineer Selection Criteria Checklist
    • None

    6. Assess the opportunities and establish a clear project scope.

    • Data Center Renovation Project Charter
    • Data Center Renovation Project Planning & Monitoring Tool

    7. Establish a budget for the data center renovation project.

    • Data Center Renovation Budget Tool

    8. Select a general contractor to execute the project.

    • None
    • Data Center Renovation Contractor Scripted Interview
    • Data Center Renovation Contractor Scripted Interview Scorecard
    • Data Center Renovation Contractor Reference Checklist
    [infographic]

    Build a Strategic IT Workforce Plan

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}390|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.6/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $180,171 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 19 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Organizational Design
    • Parent Category Link: /organizational-design
    • Talent has become a competitive differentiator. To 46% of business leaders, workforce planning is a top priority – yet only 13% do it effectively.
    • CIOs aren’t sure what they need to give the organization a competitive edge or how current staffing line-ups fall short.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • A well defined strategic workforce plan (SWP) isn’t just a nice-to-have, it’s a must-have.
    • Integrate as much data as possible into your workforce plan to best prepare you for the future. Without knowledge of your future initiatives, you are filling hypothetical holes.
    • To be successful, you need to understand your strategic initiatives, workforce landscape, and external and internal trends.

    Impact and Result

    The workforce planning process does not need to be onerous, especially with help from Info-Tech’s solid planning tools. With the right people involved and enough time invested, developing an SWP will be easier than first thought and time well spent. Leverage Info-Tech’s client-tested 5-step process to build a strategic workforce plan:

    1. Build a project charter
    2. Assess workforce competency needs
    3. Identify impact of internal and external trends
    4. Identify the impact of strategic initiatives on roles
    5. Build and monitor the workforce plan

    Build a Strategic IT Workforce Plan Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should build a strategic workforce plan for IT, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Initiate the project

    Assess the value of a strategic workforce plan and the IT department’s fit for developing one, and then structure the workforce planning project.

    • Build a Strategic Workforce Plan – Phase 1: Initiate the Project
    • IT Strategic Workforce Planning Project Charter Template
    • IT Strategic Workforce Planning Project Plan Template

    2. Analyze workforce needs

    Gather and analyze workforce needs based on an understanding of the relevant internal and external trends, and then produce a prioritized plan of action.

    • Build a Strategic Workforce Plan – Phase 2: Analyze Workforce Needs
    • Workforce Planning Workbook

    3. Build the workforce plan

    Evaluate workforce priorities, plan specific projects to address them, and formalize and integrate strategic workforce planning into regular planning processes.

    • Build a Strategic Workforce Plan – Phase 3: Build and Monitor the SWP
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Build a Strategic IT Workforce Plan

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Identify Project Goals, Metrics, and Current State

    The Purpose

    Develop a shared understanding of the challenges your organization is facing with regards to talent and workforce planning.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    An informed understanding of whether or not you need to develop a strategic workforce plan for IT.

    Activities

    1.1 Identify goals, metrics, and opportunities

    1.2 Segment current roles

    1.3 Identify organizational culture

    1.4 Assign job competencies

    1.5 Assess current talent

    Outputs

    Identified goals, metrics, and opportunities

    Documented organizational culture

    Aligned competencies to roles

    Identified current talent competency levels

    2 Assess Workforce and Analyze Trends

    The Purpose

    Perform an in-depth analysis of how internal and external trends are impacting the workforce.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    An enhanced understanding of the current talent occupying the workforce.

    Activities

    2.1 Assess environmental trends

    2.2 Identify impact on workforce requirements

    2.3 Identify how trends are impacting critical roles

    2.4 Explore viable options

    Outputs

    Complete internal trends analysis

    Complete external trends analysis

    Identified internal and external trends on specific IT roles

    3 Perform Gap Analysis

    The Purpose

    Identify the changing competencies and workforce needs of the future IT organization, including shortages and surpluses.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Determined impact of strategic initiatives on workforce needs.

    Identification of roles required in the future organization, including surpluses and shortages.

    Identified projects to fill workforce gaps.

    Activities

    3.1 Identify strategic initiatives

    3.2 Identify impact of strategic initiatives on roles

    3.3 Determine workforce estimates

    3.4 Determine projects to address gaps

    Outputs

    Identified workforce estimates for the future

    List of potential projects to address workforce gaps

    4 Prioritize and Plan

    The Purpose

    Prepare an action plan to address the critical gaps identified.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A prioritized plan of action that will fill gaps and secure better workforce outcomes for the organization.

    Activities

    4.1 Determine and prioritize action items

    4.2 Determine a schedule for review of initiatives

    4.3 Integrate workforce planning into regular planning processes

    Outputs

    Prioritized list of projects

    Completed workforce plan

    Identified opportunities for integration

    Secure IT-OT Convergence

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}382|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $10,499 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 19 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Security Processes & Operations
    • Parent Category Link: /security-processes-and-operations

    IT and OT are both very different complex systems. However, significant benefits have driven OT to be converged to IT. This results in IT security leaders, OT leaders and their teams' facing challenges in:

    • Governing and managing IT and OT security and accountabilities.
    • Converging security architecture and controls between IT and OT environments.
    • Compliance with regulations and standards.
    • Metrics for OT security effectiveness and efficiency.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Returning to isolated OT is not beneficial for the organization, therefore IT and OT need to learn to collaborate starting with communication to build trust and to overcome differences between IT and OT. Next, negotiation is needed on components such as governance and management, security controls on OT environments, compliance with regulations and standards, and metrics for OT security.
    • Most OT incidents start with attacks against IT networks and then move laterally into the OT environment. Therefore, converging IT and OT security will help protect the entire organization.
    • OT interfaces with the physical world while IT system concerns more on cyber world. Thus, the two systems have different properties. The challenge is how to create strategic collaboration between IT-OT based on negotiation and this needs top-down support.

    Impact and Result

    Info-Tech’s approach in preparing for IT/OT convergence in the planning phase is coordination and collaboration of IT and OT to

    • initiate communication to define roles and responsibilities.
    • establish governance and build cross-functional team.
    • identify convergence components and compliance obligations.
    • assess readiness.

    Secure IT/OT Convergence Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Secure IT/OT Convergence Storyboard – A step-by-step document that walks you through how to secure IT-OT convergence.

    Info-Tech provides a three-phase framework of secure IT/OT convergence, namely Plan, Enhance, and Monitor & Optimize. The essential steps in Plan are to:

  • Initiate communication to define roles and responsibilities.
  • Establish governance and build a cross-functional team.
  • Identify convergence components and compliance obligations.
  • Assess readiness.
    • Secure IT/OT Convergence Storyboard

    2. Secure IT/OT Convergence Requirements Gathering Tool – A tool to map organizational goals to secure IT-OT goals.

    This tool serves as a repository for information about the organization, compliance, and other factors that will influence your IT/OT convergence.

    • Secure IT/OT Convergence Requirements Gathering Tool

    3. Secure IT/OT Convergence RACI Chart Tool – A tool to identify and understand the owners of various IT/OT convergence across the organization.

    A critical step in secure IT/OT convergence is populating a RACI (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed) chart. The chart assists you in organizing roles for carrying out convergence steps and ensures that there are definite roles that different individuals in the organization must have. Complete this tool to assign tasks to suitable roles.

    • Secure IT/OT Convergence RACI Chart Tool
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Secure IT/OT Convergence

    Create a holistic IT/OT security culture.

    Analyst Perspective

    Are you ready for secure IT/OT convergence?

    IT/OT convergence is less of a convergence and more of a migration. The previously entirely separate OT ecosystem is migrating into the IT ecosystem, primarily to improve access via connectivity and to leverage other standard IT capabilities for economic benefit.

    In the past, OT systems were engineered to be air gapped, relying on physical protection and with little or no security in design, (e.g. OT protocols without confidentiality properties). However, now, OT has become dependent on the IT capabilities of the organization, thus OT inherits IT’s security issues, that is, OT is becoming more vulnerable to attack from outside the system. IT/OT convergence is complex because the culture, policies, and rules of IT are quite foreign to OT processes such as change management, and the culture, policies, and rules of OT are likewise foreign to IT processes.

    A secure IT/OT convergence can be conceived of as a negotiation of a strong treaty between two systems: IT and OT. The essential initial step is to begin with communication between IT and OT, followed by necessary components such as governing and managing OT security priorities and accountabilities, converging security controls between IT and OT environments, assuring compliance with regulations and standards, and establishing metrics for OT security.

    Photo of Ida Siahaan, Research Director, Security and Privacy Practice, Info-Tech Research Group. Ida Siahaan
    Research Director, Security and Privacy Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    IT and OT are both very different complex systems. However, significant benefits have driven OT to converge with IT. This results in IT security leaders, OT leaders, and their teams facing challenges with:

    • Governing and managing IT and OT security and accountabilities.
    • Converging security architecture and controls between IT and OT environments.
    • Compliance with regulations and standards.
    • Metrics for OT security effectiveness and efficiency.
    Common Obstacles
    • IT/OT network segmentation and remote access issues, as most OT incidents indicate that the attackers gained access through the IT network, followed by infiltration into OT networks.
    • OT proprietary devices and unsecure protocols use outdated systems which may be insecure by design.
    • Different requirements of OT and IT security – i.e. IT (confidentiality, integrity, and availability) vs. OT (safety, reliability, and availability).
    Info-Tech’s Approach

    Info-Tech’s approach in preparing for IT/OT convergence (i.e. the Plan phase) is coordination and collaboration of IT and OT to:

    • Initiate communication to define roles and responsibilities.
    • Establish governance and build a cross-functional team.
    • Identify convergence components and compliance obligations.
    • Assess readiness.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Returning to isolated OT is not beneficial for the organization, so IT and OT need to learn to collaborate, starting with communication to build trust and to overcome their differences. Next, negotiation is needed on components such as governance and management, security controls on OT environments, compliance with regulations and standards, and establishing metrics for OT security.

    Consequences of unsecure IT/OT convergence

    OT systems were built with no or little security design

    90% of organizations that use OT experienced a security incident. (Fortinet, 2021. Ponemon, 2019.)

    Bar graph comparing three years, 2019-2021, of four different OT security incidents: 'Ransomeware', 'Insider breaches', 'Phishing', and 'Malware'.
    (Source: Fortinet, 2021.)
    Lack of visibility

    86% of OT security-related service engagements lack complete visibility of OT network in 2021 (90% in 2020, 81% in 2019). (Source: “Cybersecurity Year In Review” Dragos, 2022.)

    The need for secure IT/OT convergence

    Important Industrial Control System (ICS) cyber incidents

    2000
    Target: Australian sewage plant. Method: Insider attack. Impact: 265,000 gallons of untreated sewage released.
    2012
    Target: Middle East energy companies. Method: Shamoon. Impact: Overwritten Windows-based systems files.
    2014
    Target: German Steel Mill. Method: Spear-phishing. Impact: Blast furnace failed to shut down.
    2017
    Target: Middle East safety instrumented system (SIS). Method: TRISIS/TRITON. Impact: Modified SIS ladder logic.
    2022
    Target: Viasat’s KA-SAT network. Method: AcidRain. Impact: Significant loss of communication for the Ukrainian military, which relied on Viasat’s services.
    Timeline of Important Industrial Control System (ICS) cyber incidents.
    1903
    Target: Marconi wireless telegraph presentation. Method: Morse code. Impact: Fake message sent “Rats, rats, rats, rats. There was a young fellow of Italy, Who diddled the public quite prettily.”
    2010
    Target: Iranian uranium enrichment plant. Method: Stuxnet. Impact: Compromised programmable logic controllers (PLCs).
    2013
    Target: ICS supply chain. Method: Havex. Impact: Remote Access Trojan (RAT) collected information and uploaded data to command-and-control (C&C) servers
    2016
    Target: Ukrainian power grid. Method: BlackEnergy. Impact: For 1-6 hours, power outages for 230,000 consumers.
    2021
    Target: Colonial Pipeline. Method: DarkSide ransomware. Impact: Compromised billing infrastructure halted the pipeline operation.

    (Source: US Department of Energy, 2018.


    ”Significant Cyber Incidents,” CSIS, 2022


    MIT Technology Review, 2022.)

    Info-Tech Insight

    Most OT incidents start with attacks against IT networks and then move laterally into the OT environment. Therefore, converging IT and OT security will help protect the entire organization.

    Case Study

    Horizon Power
    Logo for Horizon Power.
    INDUSTRY
    Utilities
    SOURCE
    Interview

    Horizon Power is the regional power provider in Western Australia and stands out as a leader not only in the innovative delivery of sustainable power, but also in digital transformation. Horizon Power is quite mature in distributed energy resource management; moving away from centralized generation to decentralized, community-led generation, which reflects in its maturity in converging IT and OT.

    Horizon Power’s IT/OT convergence journey started over six years ago when advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) was installed across its entire service area – an area covering more than one quarter of the Australian continent.

    In these early days of the journey, the focus was on leveraging matured IT approaches such as adoption of cloud services to the OT environment, rather than converging the two. Many years later, Horizon Power has enabled OT data to be more accessible to derive business benefits such as customer usage data using data analytics with the objective of improving the collection and management of the OT data to improve business performance and decision making.

    The IT/OT convergence meets legislation such as the Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF), which has impacts on the architectural layer of cybersecurity that support delivery of the site services.

    Results

    The lessons learned in converging IT and OT from Horizon Power were:

    • Start with forming relationships to build trust and overcome any divide between IT and OT.
    • Collaborate with IT and OT teams to successfully implement solutions, such as vulnerability management and discovery tools for OT assets.
    • Switch the focus from confidentiality and integrity to availability in solutions evaluation
    • Develop training and awareness programs for all levels of the organization.
    • Actively encourage visible sponsorship across management by providing regular updates and consistent messaging.
    • Monitor cybersecurity metrics such as vulnerabilities, mean time to treat vulnerabilities, and intrusion attempts.
    • Manage third-party vendors using a platform which not only performs external monitoring but provides third-party vendors with visibility or potential threats in their organization.

    The Secure IT/OT Convergence Framework

    IT/OT convergence is less of a convergence and more of a migration. The previously entirely separate OT ecosystem is migrating onto the IT ecosystem, to improve access via the internet and to leverage other standard IT capabilities. However, IT and OT are historically very different, and without careful calculation, simply connecting the two systems will result in a problem. Therefore, IT and OT need to learn to live together starting with communication to build trust and to overcome differences between IT and OT.
    Convergence Elements
    • Process convergence
    • Software and data convergence
    • Network and infrastructure convergence
    Target Groups
    • OT leader and teams
    • IT leader and teams
    • Security leader and teams
    Security Components
    • Governance and compliance
    • Security strategy
    • Risk management
    • Security policies
    • IR, DR, BCP
    • Security awareness and training
    • Security architecture and controls

    Plan

    • Initiate communication
    • Define roles and responsibilities
    • Establish governance and build a cross-functional team
    • Identify convergence elements and compliance obligations
    • Assess readiness

    Governance

    Compliance

    Enhance

    • Update security strategy for IT/OT convergence
    • Update risk-management framework for IT/OT convergence
    • Update security policies and procedures for IT/OT convergence
    • Update incident response, disaster recovery, and business continuity plan for IT/OT convergence

    Security strategy

    Risk management

    Security policies and procedures

    IR, DR, and BCP

    Monitor &
    Optimize

    • Implement awareness, induction, and cross-training program
    • Design and deploy converging security architecture and controls
    • Establish and monitor IT/OT security metrics on effectiveness and efficiency
    • Red-team followed by blue-team activity for cross-functional team building

    Awareness and cross-training

    Architecture and controls

    Phases
    Color-coded phases with arrows looping back up from the bottom to top phase.
    • Plan
    • Enhance
    • Monitor & Optimize
    Plan Outcomes
    • Mapping business goals to IT/OT security goals
    • RACI chart for priorities and accountabilities
    • Compliance obligations register
    • Readiness checklist
    Enhance Outcomes
    • Security strategy for IT/OT convergence
    • Risk management framework
    • Security policies & procedures
    • IR, DR, BCP
    Monitor & Optimize Outcomes
    • Security awareness and training
    • Security architecture and controls
    Plan Benefits
    • Improved flexibility and less divided IT/OT
    • Improved compliance
    Enhance Benefits
    • Increased strategic common goals
    • Increased efficiency and versatility
    Monitor & Optimize Benefits
    • Enhanced security
    • Reduced costs

    Plan

    Initiate communication

    To initiate communication between the IT and OT teams, it is important to understand how the two groups are different and to build trust to find a holistic approach which overcomes those differences.
    IT OT
    Remote Access Well-defined access control Usually single-level access control
    Interfaces Human Machine, equipment
    Software ERP, CRM, HRIS, payroll SCADA, DCS
    Hardware Servers, switches, PCs PLC, HMI, sensors, motors
    Networks Ethernet Fieldbus
    Focus Reporting, communication Up-time, precision, safety
    Change management Frequent updates and patches Infrequent updates and patches
    Security Confidentiality, integrity, availability Safety, reliability, availability
    Time requirement Normally not time critical Real time

    Info-Tech Insight

    OT interfaces with the physical world while IT system concerns more on cyber world. Thus, the two systems have different properties. The challenge is how to create strategic collaboration between IT and OT based on negotiation, and this needs top-down support.

    Identifying organization goals is the first step in aligning your secure IT/OT convergence with your organization’s vision.

    • Security leaders need to understand the direction the organization is headed in.
    • Wise security investments depend on aligning your security initiatives to the organization.
    • Secure IT/OT convergence should contribute to your organization’s objectives by supporting operational performance and ensuring brand protection and shareholder value.

    Map organizational goals to IT/OT security goals

    Input: Corporate, IT, and OT strategies

    Output: Your goals for the security strategy

    Materials: Secure IT/OT Convergence Requirements Gathering Tool

    Participants: Executive leadership, OT leader, IT leader, Security leader, Compliance, Legal, Risk management

    1. As a group, brainstorm organization goals.
      1. Review relevant corporate, IT, and OT strategies.
    2. Record the most important business goals in the Secure IT/OT Convergence Requirements Gathering Tool. Try to limit the number of business goals to no more than 10 goals. This limitation will be critical to helping focus on your secure IT/OT convergence.
    3. For each goal, identify one to two security alignment goals. These should be objectives for the security strategy that will support the identified organization goals.

    Download the Secure IT/OT Convergence Requirements Gathering Tool

    Record organizational goals

    Sample of the definitions table with columns numbered 1-4.

    Refer to the Secure IT/OT Convergence Framework when filling in the following elements.

    1. Record your identified organization goals in the Goals Cascade tab of the Secure IT/OT Convergence Requirements Gathering Tool.
    2. For each of your organizational goals, identify IT alignment goals.
    3. For each of your organizational goals, identify OT alignment goals.
    4. For each of your organizational goals, select one to two IT/OT security alignment goals from the drop-down lists.

    Establish scope and boundaries

    It is important to know at the outset of the strategy: What are we trying to secure in IT/OT convergence ?
    This includes physical areas we are responsible for, types of data we care about, and departments or IT/OT systems we are responsible for.

    This also includes what is not in scope. For some outsourced services or locations, you may not be responsible for their security. In some business departments, you may not have control of security processes. Ensure that it is made explicit at the outset what will be included and what will be excluded from security considerations.

    Physical Scope and Boundaries

    • How many offices and locations does your organization have?
    • Which locations/offices will be covered by your information security management system (ISMS)?
    • How sensitive is the data residing at each location?
    • You may have many physical locations, and it is not necessary to list each one. Rather, list exceptional cases that are specifically in or out of scope.

    IT Systems Scope and Boundaries

    • There may be hundreds of applications that are run and maintained in your organization. Some of these may be legacy applications. Do you need to secure all your programs or only a select few?
    • Is the system owned or outsourced?
    • Where are you accountable for security?
    • How sensitive is the data that each system handles?

    Organizational Scope and Boundaries

    • Will your ISMS cover all departments within your organization? For example, do certain departments (e.g. operations) not need any security coverage?
    • Do you have the ability to make security decisions for each department?
    • Who are the key stakeholders/data owners for each department?

    OT Systems Scope and Boundaries

    • There may be hundreds of OT systems that are run and maintained in your organization. Do you need to secure all OT or a select subset?
    • Is the system owned or outsourced?
    • Where are you accountable for safety and security?
    • What reliability requirements does each system handle?

    Record scope and boundaries

    Sample Scope and Boundaries table. Refer to the Secure IT/OT Convergence Framework when filling in the following elements:
    • Record your security-related organizational scope, physical location scope, IT systems scope, and OT systems scope in the Scope tab of the Secure IT/OT Convergence Requirements Gathering Tool.
    • For each item scoped, give the rationale for including it in the comments column. Careful attention should be paid to any elements that are not in scope.

    Plan

    Define roles and responsibilities

    Input: List of relevant stakeholders

    Output: Roles and responsibilities for the secure IT/OT convergence program

    Materials: Secure IT/OT Convergence RACI Chart Tool

    Participants: Executive leadership, OT leader, IT leader, Security leader

    There are many factors that impact an organization’s level of effectiveness as it relates to IT/OT convergence. How the two groups interact, what skill sets exist, the level of clarity around roles and responsibilities, and the degree of executive support and alignment are only a few. Thus, it is imperative in the planning phase to identify stakeholders who are:

    • Responsible: The people who do the work to accomplish the activity; they have been tasked with completing the activity and/or getting a decision made.
    • Accountable: The person who is accountable for the completion of the activity. Ideally, this is a single person and will often be an executive or program sponsor.
    • Consulted: The people who provide information. This is usually several people, typically called subject matter experts (SMEs).
    • Informed: The people who are updated on progress. These are resources that are affected by the outcome of the activities and need to be kept up to date.

    Download the Secure IT/OT Convergence RACI Chart Tool

    Define RACI Chart

    Sample RACI chart with only the 'Plan' section enlarged.

    Define responsible, accountable, consulted, and informed (RACI) stakeholders.
    1. Customize the "work units" to best reflect your operation with applicable stakeholders.
    2. Customize the "action“ rows as required.
    Info-Tech Insight

    The roles and responsibilities should be clearly defined. For example, IT network should be responsible for the communication and configuration of all access points and devices from the remote client to the control system DMZ, and controls engineering should be responsible from the control system DMZ to the control system.

    Plan

    Establish governance and build cross-functional team

    To establish governance and build an IT/OT cross-functional team, it is important to understand the operation of OT systems and their interactions with IT within the organization, e.g. ad hoc, centralized, decentralized.

    The maturity ladder with levels 'Fully Converged', 'Collaborative Partners', 'Trusted Resources', 'Affiliated Entities', and 'Siloed' at the bottom. Each level has four maturity indicators listed.

    Info-Tech Insight

    To determine IT/OT convergence maturity level, Info-Tech provides the IT/OT Convergence Self-Evaluation Tool.

    Centralized security governance model example

    Example of a centralized security governance model.

    Plan

    Identify convergence elements and compliance obligations

    To switch the focus from confidentiality and integrity to safety and availability for OT system, it is important to have a common language such as the Purdue model for technical communication.
    • A lot of OT compliance standards are technically focused and do not address governance and management, e.g. IT standards like the NIST Cybersecurity Framework. For example, OT system modeling with Purdue model will help IT teams to understand assets, networking, and controls. This understanding is needed to know the possible security solutions and where these solutions could be embedded to the OT system with respect to safety, reliability, and availability.
    • However, deployment of technical solutions or patches to OT system may nullify warranty, so arrangements should be made to manage this with the vendor or manufacturer prior to modification.
    • Finally, OT modernizations such as smart grid together with the advent of IIoT where data flow is becoming less hierarchical have encouraged the birth of a hybrid Purdue model, which maintains segmentation with flexibility for communications.

    Level 5: Enterprise Network

    Level 4: Site Business

    Level 3.5: DMZ
    Example: Patch Management Server, Application Server, Remote Access Server

    Level 3: Site Operations
    Example: SCADA Server, Engineering Workstation, Historian

    Level 2: Area Supervisory Control
    Example: SCADA Client, HMI

    Level 1: Basic Control
    Example: Batch Controls, Discrete Controls, Continuous Process Controls, Safety Controls, e.g. PLCs, RTUs

    Level 0: Process
    Example: Sensors, Actuators, Field Devices

    (Source: “Purdue Enterprise Reference Architecture (PERA) Model,” ISA-99.)

    Identify compliance obligations

    To manage compliance obligations, it is important to use a platform which not only performs internal and external monitoring, but also provides third-party vendors with visibility on potential threats in their organization.
    Example table of compliance obligations standards. Example tables of compliance obligations regulations and guidelines.

    Source:
    ENISA, 2013
    DHS, 2009.

    • OT system has compliance obligations with industry regulations and security standards/regulations/guidelines. See the lists given. The lists are not exhaustive.
    • OT system owner can use the standards/regulations/guidelines as a benchmark to determine and manage the security level provided by third parties.
    • It is important to understand the various frameworks and to adhere to the appropriate compliance obligations, e.g. IEC/ISA 62443 - Security for Industrial Automation and Control Systems Series.

    IEC/ISA 62443 - Security for Industrial Automation and Control Systems Series

    International series of standards for asset owners, system integrators, and product manufacturers.
    Diagram of the international series of standards for asset owners.
    (Source: Cooksley, 2021)
    • IEC/ISA 62443 is a comprehensive international series of standards covering security for ICS systems, which recognizes three roles, namely: asset owner, system integrator, and product manufacturer.
    • In IEC/ISA 62443, requirements flow from the asset owner to the product manufacturer, while solutions flow in the opposite direction.
    • For the asset owner who owns and operates a system, IEC 62443-2 enables defining target security level with reference to a threat level and using the standard as a benchmark to determine the current security level.
    • For the system integrator, IEC 62443-3 assists to evaluate the asset owner’s requirements to create a system design. IEC 62443-3 also provides a method for verification that components provided by the product manufacturer are securely developed and support the functionality required.

    Record your compliance obligations

    Refer to the “Goals Cascade” tab of the Secure IT/OT Convergence Requirements Gathering Tool.
    1. Identify your compliance obligations. Most organizations have compliance obligations that must be adhered to. These can include both mandatory and voluntary obligations. Mandatory obligations include:
      1. Laws
      2. Government regulations
      3. Industry standards
      4. Contractual agreements
      Voluntary obligations include standards that the organization has chosen to follow for best practices and any obligations that are required to maintain certifications. Organizations will have many different compliance obligations. For the purposes of your secure IT/OT convergence, include only those that have OT security requirements.
    2. Record your compliance obligations, along with any notes, in your copy of the Secure IT/OT Convergence Requirements Gathering Tool.
    3. Refer to the “Compliance DB” tab for lists of standards/regulations/guidelines.
    Table of mandatory and voluntary security compliance obligations.

    Plan

    Assess readiness

    Readiness checklist for secure IT/OT convergence

    People

    • Define roles and responsibilities on interaction based on skill sets and the degree of support and alignment.
    • Adopt well-established security governance practices for cross-functional teams.
    • Analyze and develop skills required by implementing awareness, induction, and cross-training program.

    Process

    • Conduct a maturity assessment of key processes and highlight interdependencies.
    • Redesign cybersecurity processes for your secure IT/OT convergence program.
    • Develop a baseline and periodically review on risks, security policies and procedures, incident response, disaster recovery, and business continuity plan.

    Technology

    • Conduct a maturity assessment and identify convergence elements and compliance obligations.
    • Develop a roadmap and deploy converging security architecture and controls step by step, working with trusted technology partners.
    • Monitor security metrics on effectiveness and efficiency and conduct continuous testing by red-team and blue-team activities.

    (Source: “Grid Modernization: Optimize Opportunities And Minimize Risks,” Info-Tech)

    Enhance

    Update security strategy

    To update security strategy, it is important to actively encourage visible sponsorship across management and to provide regular updates.

    Cycle for updating security strategy: 'Architecture design', 'Procurement', 'Installation', 'Maintenance', 'Decommissioning'.
    (Source: NIST SP 800-82 Rev.3, “Guide to Operational Technology (OT) Security,” NIST, 2022.)
    • OT system life cycle is like the IT system life cycle, starting with architectural design and ending with decommissioning.
    • Currently, IT only gets involved from installation or maintenance, so they may not fully understand the OT system. Therefore, if OT security is compromised, the same personnel who commissioned the OT system (e.g. engineering, electrical, and maintenance specialists) must be involved. Thus, it is important to have the IT team collaborate with the OT team in each stage of the OT system’s life cycle.
    • Finally, it is necessary to have propositional sharing of responsibilities between IT leaders, security leaders, and OT leaders who have broader responsibilities.

    Enhance

    Update risk management framework

    The need for asset and threat taxonomy

    • One of issues in IT/OT convergence is that OT systems focus on production, so IT solutions like security patching or updates may deteriorate a machine or take a machine offline and may not be applicable. For example, some facilities run with reliability of 99.999%, which only allows maximum of 5 minutes and 35 seconds or less of downtime per year.
    • Managing risks requires an understanding of the assets and threats for IT/OT systems. Having a taxonomy of the assets and the threats cand help.
    • Applying normal IT solutions to mitigate security risks may not be applicable in an OT environment, e.g. running an antivirus tool on OT system may remove essential OT operations files. Thus, this approach must be avoided; instead, systems must be rebuilt from golden images.
    Risk management framework.
    (Source: ENISA, 2018.)

    Enhance

    Update security policies and procedures

    • Policy is the link between people, process, and technology for any size of organization. Small organizations may think that having formal policies in place is not necessary for their operations, but compliance is applicable to all organizations, and vulnerabilities affect organizations of all sizes as well. Small organizations partnering with clients or other organizations are sometimes viewed as ideal proxies for attackers.
    • Updating security policies to align with the OT system so that there is a uniform approach to securing both IT and OT environments has several benefits. For example, enhancing the overall security posture as issues are pre-emptively avoided, being better prepared for auditing and compliance requirements, and improving governance especially when OT governance is weak.
    • In updating security policies, it is important to redefine the policy framework to include the OT framework and to prioritize the development of security policies. For example, entities that own or manage US and Canadian electric power grids must comply with North American Electric Reliability Corporation Critical Infrastructure Protection (NERC CIP) standards, specifically CIP-003 for Policy and Governance. This can be achieved by understanding the current state of policies and by right-sizing the policy suite based on a policy hierarchy.
    The White House released an Executive Order on Improving the Nation’s Cybersecurity (EO 14028) in 2021 that establishes new requirements on the scope of protection and security policy such that it must include both IT and OT.

    Policy hierarchy example

    This example of a policy hierarchy features templates from Info-Tech’s Develop and Deploy Security Policies and Identify the Best Framework for Your Security Policies research.

    Example policy hierarchy with four levels, from top-down: 'Governance', 'Process-based policies', 'Prescriptive/ technical (for IT including OT elements)', 'Prescriptive/ technical (for users)'.

    Enhance

    Update IR, DR, and BCP

    A proactive approach to security is important, so actions such as updating and testing the incident response plan for OT are a must. (“Cybersecurity Year In Review” Dragos, 2022.)

    1. Customize organizational chart for IT/OT IR, DR, BCP based on governance and management model.
      E.g. ad hoc, internal distributed, internal centralized, combined distributed, and decentralized. (Software Engineering Institute, 2003)
    2. Adjust the authority of the new organizational chart and decide if it requires additional staffing.
      E.g. full authority, shared authority. (Software Engineering Institute, 2003)
    3. Update IR plan, DR plan, and BCP for IT/OT convergence.
      E.g. incorporate zero trust principles for converge network
    4. Testing updated IR plan, DR plan, and BCP.

    Optimize

    Implement awareness, induction, and cross-training

    To develop training and awareness programs for all levels of the organization, it is important to understand the common challenges in IT security that also affect secure IT/OT convergence and how to overcome those challenges.

    Alert Fatigue

    Too many false alarms, too many events to process, and an evolving threat landscape that wastes analysts’ valuable time on mundane tasks such as evidence collection. Meanwhile, only limited time is given for decision and conclusion, which results in fear of missing an incident and alert fatigue.

    Skill Shortages

    Obtaining and retaining cybersecurity-skilled talent is challenging. Organizations need to invest in the people, but not all organizations will be able to invest sufficiently to have their own dedicated security team.

    Lack of Insight

    To report progress, clear metrics are needed. However, cybersecurity still falls short in this area, as the system itself is complex, and much work is siloed. Furthermore, lessons learned are not yet distilled into insights yet for improving future accuracy.

    Lack of Visibility

    Ensuring complete visibility of the threat landscape, risks, and assets requires system integration and consistent workflow across the organization, and the convergence of OT, IoT, and IT enhances this challenge (e.g. machines cannot be scanned during operational uptime).
    (Source: Security Intelligence, 2020.)
    “Cybersecurity staff are feeling burnout and stressed to the extent that many are considering leaving their jobs.” (Danny Palmer, ZDNET News, 2022)

    Awareness may not correspond to readiness

    • An issue with IT/OT convergence training and awareness happens when awareness exists, but the personnel are trained only for IT security and are not trained for OT-specific security. For example, some organizations still use generic topics such as not opening email attachments, when the personnel do not even operate using email nor in a web browsing environment. (“Assessing Operational Readiness,” Dragos, 2022)
    • Meanwhile, as is the case with IT, OT security training topics are broad, such as OT threat intelligence, OT-specific incident response, and tabletop exercises.
    • Hence, it requires the creation of a training program development plan that considers the various audiences and topics and maps them accordingly.
    • Moreover, roles are also evolving due to convergence and modernization. These new roles require an integrative skill set. For example, the grid security & ops team might consist of an IT security specialist, SCADA technician/engineer, and OT/IIOT security specialist where OT/IIOT security specialist is a new role. (Grid Modernization: Optimize Opportunities and Minimize Risks,” Info-Tech)
    • In conclusion, it is important to approach talent development with an open mind. The ability to learn and flexibility in the face of change are important attributes, and technical skill sets can be improved with certifications and training.
    “One area regularly observed by Dragos is a weakness in overall cyber readiness and training tailored specific to the OT environment.” (“Assessing Operational Technology,” Dragos, 2022.)

    Certifications

    What are the options?
    • One of issues in certification is the complexity on relevancy in topics with respect to roles and levels.
    • An example solution is the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA)’s approach to analyzing existing certifications by orientation, scope, and supporting bodies, grouped into specific certifications, relevant certifications, and safety certifications.

    Specific cybersecurity certification of ICS/SCADA
    Example: ISA-99/IEC 62443 Cybersecurity Certificate Program, GIAC Global Industrial Cyber Security Professional (GICSP), Certified SCADA Security Architect (CSSA), EC-Council ICS/SCADA Cybersecurity Training Course.

    Other relevant certification schemes
    Example: Network and Information Security (NIS) Driving License, ISA Certified Automation Professional (CAP), Industrial Security Professional Certification (NCMS-ISP).

    Safety Certifications
    Example: Board of Certified Safety Professionals (BCSP), European Network of Safety and Health Professional Organisations (ENSHPO).

    Order of certifications with 'Orientation' at the top, 'Scope', then 'Support'.(Source: ENISA, 2015.)

    Optimize

    Design and deploy converging security architecture and controls

    • IT/OT convergence architecture can be modeled as a layered structure based on security. In this structure, the bottom layer is referred as “OT High-Security Zone” and the topmost layer is “IT Low-Security Zone.” In this model, each layer has its own set of controls configured and acts like an additional layer of security for the zone underneath it.
    • The data flows from the “OT High-Security Zone” to the topmost layer, the “IT Low-Security Zone,” and the traffic must be verified to pass to another zone based on the need-to-know principle.
    • In the normal control flow within the “OT High-Security Zone” from level 3 to level 0, the traffic must be verified to pass to another level based on the principle of least privilege.
    • Remote access (dotted arrow) is allowed under strict access control and change control based on the zero-trust principle with clear segmentation and a point for disconnection between the “OT High-Security Zone” and the “OT Low-Security Zone”
    • This model simplifies the security process, as if the lower layers have been compromised, then the compromise can be confined on that layer, and it also prevents lateral movement as access is always verified.
    Diagram for the deployments of converging security architecture.(Source: “Purdue Enterprise Reference Architecture (PERA) model,” ISA-99.)

    Off-the-shelf solutions

    Getting the right recipe: What criteria to consider?

    Image of a shopping cart with the four headlines on the right listed in order from top to bottom.
    Icon of an eye crossed out. Visibility and Asset Management

    Passive data monitoring using various protocol layers, active queries to devices, or parsing configuration files of OT, IoT, and IT environments on assets, processes, and connectivity paths.

    Icon of gears. Threat Detection, Mitigation, and Response (+ Hunting)

    Automation of threat analysis (signature-based, specification-based, anomaly-based, sandboxing) not only in IT but also in relevant environments, e.g. IoT, IIoT, and OT on assets, data, network, and orchestration with threat intelligence sharing and analytics.

    Icon of a check and pen. Risk Assessment and Vulnerability Management

    Risk scoring approach (qualitative, quantitative) based on variables such as behavioral patterns and geolocation. Patching and vulnerability management.

    Icon of a wallet. Usability, Architecture, Cost

    The user and administrative experience, multiple deployment options and extensive integration capabilities, and affordability.

    Optimize

    Establish and monitor IT/OT security metrics for effectiveness and efficiency

    Role of security metrics in a cybersecurity program (EPRI, 2017.)
    • Requirements for secure IT/OT are derived from mandatory or voluntary compliance, e.g. NERC CIP, NIST SP 800-53.
    • Frameworks for secure IT/OT are used to build and implement security, e.g. NIST CSF, AESCSF.
    • Maturity of secure IT/OT is used to measure the state of security, e.g. C2M2, CMMC.
    • Security metrics have the role of measuring effectiveness and efficiency.

    Icon of a person ascending stairs.
    Safety

    OT interfaces with the physical world. Thus, metrics based on risks related with life, health, and safety are crucial. These metrics motivate personnel by making clear why they should care about security. (EPRI, 2017.)

    Icon of a person ascending stairs.
    Business Performance

    The impact of security on the business can be measured in various metrics such as operational metrics, service level agreements (SLAs), and financial metrics. (BMC, 2022.)

    Icon of a person ascending stairs.
    Technology Performance

    Early detection will lead to faster remediation and less damage. Therefore, metrics such as maximum tolerable downtime (MTD) and mean time to recovery (MTR) indicate system reliability. (Dark Reading, 2022)

    Icon of a person ascending stairs.
    Security Culture

    The metrics for the overall quality of security culture with indicators such as compliance and audit, vulnerability management, and training and awareness.

    Further information

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Sample of 'Build an Information Security Strategy'.

    Build an Information Security Strategy

    Info-Tech has developed a highly effective approach to building an information security strategy – an approach that has been successfully tested and refined for over seven years with hundreds of organizations.

    This unique approach includes tools for ensuring alignment with business objectives, assessing organizational risk and stakeholder expectations, enabling a comprehensive current-state assessment, prioritizing initiatives, and building a security roadmap.

    Sample of 'Preparing for Technology Convergence in Manufacturing'.

    Preparing for Technology Convergence in Manufacturing

    Information technology (IT) and operational technology (OT) teams have a long history of misalignment and poor communication.

    Stakeholder expectations and technology convergence create the need to leave the past behind and build a culture of collaboration.

    Sample of 'Implement a Security Governance and Management Program'.

    Implement a Security Governance and Management Program

    Your security governance and management program needs to be aligned with business goals to be effective.

    This approach also helps provide a starting point to develop a realistic governance and management program.

    This project will guide you through the process of implementing and monitoring a security governance and management program that prioritizes security while keeping costs to a minimum.

    Bibliography

    Assante, Michael J. and Robert M. Lee. “The Industrial Control System Cyber Kill Chain.” SANS Institute, 2015.

    “Certification of Cyber Security Skills of ICS/SCADA Professionals.” European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), 2015. Web.

    Cooksley, Mark. “The IEC 62443 Series of Standards: A Product Manufacturer‘s Perspective.” YouTube, uploaded by Plainly Explained, 27 Apr. 2021. Accessed 26 Aug. 2022.

    “Cyber Security Metrics for the Electric Sector: Volume 3.” Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), 2017.

    “Cybersecurity and Physical Security Convergence.” Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). Accessed 19 May 2022.

    “Cybersecurity in Operational Technology: 7 Insights You Need to Know,” Ponemon, 2019. Web.

    “Developing an Operational Technology and Information Technology Incident Response Plan.” Public Safety Canada, 2020. Accessed 6 Sep. 2022.

    Gilsinn, Jim. “Assessing Operational Technology (OT) Cybersecurity Maturity.” Dragos, 2021. Accessed 02 Sep. 2022.

    “Good Practices for Security of Internet of Things.” European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), 2018. Web.

    Greenfield, David. “Is the Purdue Model Still Relevant?” AutomationWorld. Accessed 1 Sep. 2022

    Hemsley, Kevin E., and Dr. Robert E. Fisher. “History of Industrial Control System Cyber Incidents.” US Department of Energy (DOE), 2018. Accessed 29 Aug. 2022.

    “ICS Security Related Working Groups, Standards and Initiatives.” European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), 2013.

    Killcrece, Georgia, et al. “Organizational Models for Computer Security Incident Response Teams (CSIRTs).” Software Engineering Institute, CMU, 2003.

    Liebig, Edward. “Security Culture: An OT Survival Story.” Dark Reading, 30 Aug. 2022. Accessed 29 Aug. 2022.

    Bibliography

    O'Neill, Patrick. “Russia Hacked an American Satellite Company One Hour Before the Ukraine Invasion.” MIT Technology Review, 10 May 2022. Accessed 26 Aug. 2022.

    Palmer, Danny. “Your Cybersecurity Staff Are Burned Out – And Many Have Thought About Quitting.” Zdnet, 08 Aug. 2022. Accessed 19 Aug. 2022.

    Pathak, Parag. “What Is Threat Management? Common Challenges and Best Practices.” SecurityIntelligence, 23 Jan. 2020. Web.

    Raza, Muhammad. “Introduction To IT Metrics & KPIs.” BMC, 5 May 2022. Accessed 12 Sep. 2022.

    “Recommended Practice: Developing an Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity Incident Response Capability.” Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Oct. 2009. Web.

    Sharma, Ax. “Sigma Rules Explained: When and How to Use Them to Log Events.” CSO Online, 16 Jun. 2018. Accessed 15 Aug. 2022.

    “Significant Cyber Incidents.” Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). Accessed 1 Sep. 2022.

    Tom, Steven, et al. “Recommended Practice for Patch Management of Control Systems.” Department of Homeland Security (DHS), 2008. Web.

    “2021 ICS/OT Cybersecurity Year In Review.” Dragos, 2022. Accessed 6 Sep. 2022.

    “2021 State of Operational Technology and Cybersecurity Report,” Fortinet, 2021. Web.

    Zetter, Kim. “Pre-Stuxnet, Post-Stuxnet: Everything Has Changed, Nothing Has Changed.” Black Hat USA, 08 Aug. 2022. Accessed 19 Aug. 2022.

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Photo of Jeff Campbell, Manager, Technology Shared Services, Horizon Power, AU. Jeff Campbell
    Manager, Technology Shared Services
    Horizon Power, AU

    Jeff Campbell has more than 20 years' experience in information security, having worked in both private and government organizations in education, finance, and utilities sectors.

    Having focused on developing and implementing information security programs and controls, Jeff is tasked with enabling Horizon Power to capitalize on IoT opportunities while maintaining the core security basics of confidentiality, integrity and availability.

    As Horizon Power leads the energy transition and moves to become a digital utility, Jeff ensures the security architecture that supports these services provides safer and more reliable automation infrastructures.

    Christopher Harrington
    Chief Technology Officer (CTO)
    Carolinas Telco Federal Credit Union

    Frank DePaola
    Vice President, Chief Information Security Officer (CISO)
    Enpro

    Kwasi Boakye-Boateng
    Cybersecurity Researcher
    Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity

    Create and Manage Enterprise Data Models

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}340|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.2/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $7,263 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 16 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Data Management
    • Parent Category Link: /data-management
    • Business executives don’t understand the value of Conceptual and Logical Data Models and how they define their data assets.
    • Data, like mercury, is difficult to manage and contain.
    • IT needs to justify the time and cost of developing and maintaining Data Models.
    • Data as an asset is only perceived from a physical point of view, and the metadata that provides context and definition is often ignored.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Data Models tell the story of the organization and its data in pictures to be used by a business as a tool to evolve the business capabilities and processes.
    • Data Architecture and Data Modeling have different purposes and should be represented as two distinct processes within the software development lifecycle (SDLC).
    • The Conceptual Model provides a quick win for both business and IT because it can convey abstract business concepts and thereby compartmentalize the problem space.

    Impact and Result

    • A Conceptual Model can be used to define the semantics and relationships for your analytical layer.
      • It provides a visual representation of your data in the semantics of business.
      • It acts as the anchor point for all data lineages.
      • It can be used by business users and IT for data warehouse and analytical planning.
      • It provides the taxonomies for data access profiles.
      • It acts as the basis for your Enterprise Logical and Message Models.

    Create and Manage Enterprise Data Models Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should create enterprise data models, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Setting the stage

    Prepare your environment for data architecture.

    • Enterprise Data Models

    2. Revisit your SDLC

    Revisit your SDLC to embed data architecture.

    • Enterprise Architecture Tool Selection

    3. Develop a Conceptual Model

    Create and maintain your Conceptual Data Model via an iterative process.

    4. Data Modeling Playbook

    View the main deliverable with sample models.

    • Data Modeling Playbook
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Create and Manage Enterprise Data Models

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Establish the Data Architecture Practice

    The Purpose

    Understand the context and goals of data architecture in your organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A foundation for your data architecture practice.

    Activities

    1.1 Review the business context.

    1.2 Obtain business commitment and expectations for data architecture.

    1.3 Define data architecture as a discipline, its role, and the deliverables.

    1.4 Revisit your SDLC to embed data architecture.

    1.5 Modeling tool acquisition if required.

    Outputs

    Data Architecture vision and mission and governance.

    Revised SDLC to include data architecture.

    Staffing strategy.

    Data Architecture engagement protocol.

    Installed modeling tool.

    2 Business Architecture and Domain Modeling

    The Purpose

    Identify the concepts and domains that will inform your data models.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Defined concepts for your data models.

    Activities

    2.1 Revisit business architecture output.

    2.2 Business domain selection.

    2.3 Identify business concepts.

    2.4 Organize and group of business concepts.

    2.5 Build the Business Data Glossary.

    Outputs

    List of defined and documented entities for the selected.

    Practice in the use of capability and business process models to identify key data concepts.

    Practice the domain modeling process of grouping and defining your bounded contexts.

    3 Harvesting Reference Models

    The Purpose

    Harvest reference models for your data architecture.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Reference models selected.

    Activities

    3.1 Reference model selection.

    3.2 Exploring and searching the reference model.

    3.3 Harvesting strategies and maintaining linkage.

    3.4 Extending the conceptual and logical models.

    Outputs

    Established and practiced steps to extend the conceptual or logical model from the reference model while maintaining lineage.

    4 Harvesting Existing Data Artifacts

    The Purpose

    Gather more information to create your data models.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Remaining steps and materials to build your data models.

    Activities

    4.1 Use your data inventory to select source models.

    4.2 Match semantics.

    4.3 Maintain lineage between BDG and existing sources.

    4.4 Select and harvest attributes.

    4.5 Define modeling standards.

    Outputs

    List of different methods to reverse engineer existing models.

    Practiced steps to extend the logical model from existing models.

    Report examples.

    5 Next Steps and Wrap-Up (offsite)

    The Purpose

    Wrap up the workshop and set your data models up for future success.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understanding of functions and processes that will use the data models.

    Activities

    5.1 Institutionalize data architecture practices, standards, and procedures.

    5.2 Exploit and extend the use of the Conceptual model in the organization.

    Outputs

    Data governance policies, standards, and procedures for data architecture.

    List of business function and processes that will utilize the Conceptual model.

    Innovation

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}21|cart{/j2store}
    • Related Products: {j2store}21|crosssells{/j2store}
    • Teaser Video: Visit Website
    • Teaser Video Title: Digital Ethics = Data Equity
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • sidebar graphic: Visit Link
    • Parent Category Name: Strategy and Governance
    • Parent Category Link: /strategy-and-governance
    Innovation is the at heart of every organization, especially in these fast moving times. It does not matter if you are in a supporting or "traditional" sector.  The company performing the service in a faster, better and more efficient way, wins.

    innovation

    Combine Security Risk Management Components Into One Program

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}376|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.1/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $37,798 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 32 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Governance, Risk & Compliance
    • Parent Category Link: /governance-risk-compliance
    • Companies are aware of the need to discuss and assess risk, but many struggle to do so in a systematic and repeatable way.
    • Rarely are security risks analyzed in a consistent manner, let alone in a systematic and repeatable method to determine project risk as well as overall organizational risk exposure.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • The best security programs are built upon defensible risk management. With an appropriate risk management program in place, you can ensure that security decisions are made strategically instead of based on frameworks and gut feelings. This will optimize any security planning and budgeting.
    • All risks can be quantified. Security, compliance, legal, or other risks can be quantified using our methodology.

    Impact and Result

    • Develop a security risk management program to create a standardized methodology for assessing and managing the risk that information systems face.
    • Build a risk governance structure that makes it clear how security risks can be escalated within the organization and who makes the final decision on certain risks.
    • Use Info-Tech’s risk assessment methodology to quantifiably evaluate the threat severity for any new or existing project or initiative.
    • Tie together all aspects of your risk management program, including your information security risk tolerance level, threat and risk assessments, and mitigation effectiveness models.

    Combine Security Risk Management Components Into One Program Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should develop and implement a security risk management program, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Establish the risk environment

    Lay down the foundations for security risk management, including roles and responsibilities and a defined risk tolerance level.

    • Combine Security Risk Management Components Into One Program – Phase 1: Establish the Risk Environment
    • Security Risk Governance Responsibilities and RACI Template
    • Risk Tolerance Determination Tool
    • Risk Weighting Determination Tool

    2. Conduct threat and risk assessments

    Define frequency and impact rankings then assess the risk of your project.

    • Combine Security Risk Management Components Into One Program – Phase 2: Conduct Threat and Risk Assessments
    • Threat and Risk Assessment Process Template
    • Threat and Risk Assessment Tool

    3. Build the security risk register

    Catalog an inventory of individual risks to create an overall risk profile.

    • Combine Security Risk Management Components Into One Program – Phase 3: Build the Security Risk Register
    • Security Risk Register Tool

    4. Communicate the risk management program

    Communicate the risk-based conclusions and leverage these in security decision making.

    • Combine Security Risk Management Components Into One Program – Phase 4: Communicate the Risk Management Program
    • Security Risk Management Presentation Template
    • Security Risk Management Summary Template
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Combine Security Risk Management Components Into One Program

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Establish the Risk Environment

    The Purpose

    Build the foundation needed for a security risk management program.

    Define roles and responsibilities of the risk executive.

    Define an information security risk tolerance level.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Clearly defined roles and responsibilities.

    Defined risk tolerance level.

    Activities

    1.1 Define the security executive function RACI chart.

    1.2 Assess business context for security risk management.

    1.3 Standardize risk terminology assumptions.

    1.4 Conduct preliminary evaluation of risk scenarios to determine your risk tolerance level.

    1.5 Decide on a custom risk factor weighting.

    1.6 Finalize the risk tolerance level.

    1.7 Begin threat and risk assessment.

    Outputs

    Defined risk executive functions

    Risk governance RACI chart

    Defined quantified risk tolerance and risk factor weightings

    2 Conduct Threat and Risk Assessments

    The Purpose

    Determine when and how to conduct threat and risk assessments (TRAs).

    Complete one or two TRAs, as time permits during the workshop.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Developed process for how to conduct threat and risk assessments.

    Deep risk analysis for one or two IT projects/initiatives.

    Activities

    2.1 Determine when to initiate a risk assessment.

    2.2 Review appropriate data classification scheme.

    2.3 Identify system elements and perform data discovery.

    2.4 Map data types to the elements.

    2.5 Identify STRIDE threats and assess risk factors.

    2.6 Determine risk actions taking place and assign countermeasures.

    2.7 Calculate mitigated risk severity based on actions.

    2.8 If necessary, revisit risk tolerance.

    2.9 Document threat and risk assessment methodology.

    Outputs

    Define scope of system elements and data within assessment

    Mapping of data to different system elements

    Threat identification and associated risk severity

    Defined risk actions to take place in threat and risk assessment process

    3 Continue to Conduct Threat and Risk Assessments

    The Purpose

    Complete one or two TRAs, as time permits during the workshop.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Deep risk analysis for one or two IT projects/initiatives, as time permits.

    Activities

    3.1 Continue threat and risk assessment activities.

    3.2 As time permits, one to two threat and risk assessment activities will be performed as part of the workshop.

    3.3 Review risk assessment results and compare to risk tolerance level.

    Outputs

    One to two threat and risk assessment activities performed

    Validation of the risk tolerance level

    4 Establish a Risk Register and Communicate Risk

    The Purpose

    Collect, analyze, and aggregate all individual risks into the security risk register.

    Plan for the future of risk management.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Established risk register to provide overview of the organizational aggregate risk profile.

    Ability to communicate risk to other stakeholders as needed.

    Activities

    4.1 Begin building a risk register.

    4.2 Identify individual risks and threats that exist in the organization.

    4.3 Decide risk responses, depending on the risk level as it relates to the risk tolerance.

    4.4 If necessary, revisit risk tolerance.

    4.5 Identify which stakeholders sign off on each risk.

    4.6 Plan for the future of risk management.

    4.7 Determine how to present risk to senior management.

    Outputs

    Risk register, with an inventory of risks and a macro view of the organization’s risk

    Defined risk-based initiatives to complete

    Plan for securing and managing the risk register

    Assess Infrastructure Readiness for Digital Transformation

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}300|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Strategy and Organizational Design
    • Parent Category Link: /strategy-and-organizational-design

    There are many challenges for I&O when it comes to digital transformation, including:

    • Legacy infrastructure technical debt
    • Skills and talent in the IT team
    • A culture that resists change
    • Fear of job loss

    These and many more will hinder your progress, which demonstrates the need to invest in modernizing your infrastructure, investing in training and hiring talent, and cultivating a culture that supports digital transformation.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    By using the framework of culture, competencies, collaboration and capabilities, organizations can create dimensions in their I&O structure in order to shift from traditional infrastructure management to becoming a strategic enabler, driving agility, innovation, and operational excellence though the effective integration of people, process, and technology.

    Impact and Result

    By driving a customer-centric approach, delivering a successful transformation can be tailored to the business goals and drive adoption and engagement. Refining your roadmap through data and analytics will drive this change. Use third-party expertise to guide your transformation and help build that vision of the future.

    Assess Infrastructure Readiness for Digital Transformation Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Assess Infrastructure Readiness for Digital Transformation – Unlock the full potential of your infrastructure with a digital transformation strategy and clear the barriers for success.

  • Be customer centric as opposed to being technology driven.
  • Understanding business needs and pain points is key to delivering solutions.
  • Approach infrastructure digital transformation in iterations and look at this as a journey.
    • Assess Infrastructure Readiness for Digital Transformation Storyboard
    • I&O Digital Transformation Maturity Assessment Tool

    Infographic

    Further reading

    Assess Infrastructure Readiness for Digital Transformation

    Unlock the full potential of your infrastructure with a digital transformation strategy and clear the barriers to success.

    Analyst Perspective

    It’s not just about the technology!

    Many businesses fail in their endeavors to complete a digital transformation, but the reasons are complex, and there are many ways to fail, whether it is people, process, or technology. In fact, according to many surveys, 70% of digital transformations fail, and it’s mainly down to strategy – or the lack thereof.

    A lot of organizations think of digital transformation as just an investment in technology, with no vision of what they are trying to achieve or transform. So, out of the gate, many organizations fail to undergo a meaningful transformation, change their business model, or bring about a culture of digital transformation needed to be seriously competitive in their given market.

    When it comes to I&O leaders who have been given a mandate to drive digital transformation projects, they still must align to the vision and mission of the organization; they must still train and hire staff that will be experts in their field; they must still drive process improvements and align the right technology to meet the needs of a digital transformation.

    John Donovan

    John Donovan

    Principal Research Director, I&O
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Insight summary

    Overarching insight

    Digital transformation requires I&O teams to shift from traditional infrastructure management to becoming a strategic enabler, driving agility, innovation, and operational excellence through effective integration of people, process, and technology.

    Insight 1

    Collaboration is a key component of I&O – Promote strong collaboration between I&O and other business functions. When doing a digital transformation, it is clear that this is a cross-functional effort. Business leaders and IT teams need to align their objectives, prioritize initiatives, and ensure that you are seamlessly integrating technologies with the new business functions.

    Insight 2

    Embrace agility and adaptability as core principles – As the digital landscape continues to evolve, it is paramount that I&O leaders are agile and adaptable to changing business needs, adopting new technology and implementing new innovative solutions. The culture of continuous improvement and openness to experimentation and learning will assist the I&O leaders in their journey.

    Insight 3

    Future-proof your infrastructure and operations – By anticipating emerging technologies and trends, you can proactively plan and organize your team for future needs. By investing in scalable, flexible infrastructure such as cloud services, automation, AI technologies, and continuously upskilling the IT staff, you can stay relevant and forward-looking in the digital space.

    Tactical insight

    An IT infrastructure maturity assessment is a foundational step in the journey of digital transformation. The demand will be on performance, resilience, and scalability. IT infrastructure must be able to support innovation and rapid deployment of services.

    Tactical insight

    Having a clear strategy, with leadership commitment along with hiring and training the right people, monitoring and measuring your progress, and ensuring it is a business-led journey will increase your chances of success.

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    There are a lot of challenges for I&O when it comes to digital transformation, including:

    • Legacy infrastructure technical debt.
    • Skills and talent in the IT team.
    • A culture that resists change.
    • Fear of job loss.

    These and many more will hinder your progress, which demonstrates the need to invest in modernizing your infrastructure, investing in training and hiring talent, and cultivating a culture that supports digital transformation.

    Common Obstacles

    Many obstacles to digital transformation begin with non-I&O activities, including:

    • Lack of a clear vision and strategy.
    • Siloed organizational structure.
    • Lack of governance and data management.
    • Limited budget and resources.

    By addressing these obstacles, I&O will have a better chance of a successful transformation and delivering the full potential of digital technologies.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    Building a culture of innovation by developing clear goals and creating a vision will be key.

    • Be customer centric as opposed to being technology driven.
    • Understand the business needs and pain points in order to effectively deliver solutions.
    • Approach infrastructure digital transformation in iterations and look at it as a journey.

    By completing the Info-Tech digital readiness questionnaire, you will see where you are in terms of maturity and areas you need to concentrate on.

    Info-Tech Insight

    By driving a customer-centric approach, delivering a successful transformation can be tailored to the business goals and drive adoption and engagement. Refining your roadmap through data and analytics will drive this change. Use third-party expertise to guide your transformation and help build that vision of the future.

    The cost of digital transformation

    The challenges that stand in the way of your success, and what is needed to reverse the risk

    What CIOs are saying about their challenges

    26% of those CIOs surveyed cite resistance to change, with entrenched viewpoints demonstrating a real need for a cultural shift to enhance the digital transformation journey.

    Source: Prophet, 2019.

    70% of digital transformation projects fall short of their objectives – even when their leadership is aligned, often with serious consequences.

    Source: BCG, 2020.

    Having a clear strategy and commitment from leadership, hiring and training the right people, monitoring and measuring your progress, and ensuring it is a business-led journey will increase your chances of success.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Cultural change, business alignment, skills training, and setting a clear strategy with KPIs to demonstrate success are all key to being successful in your digital journey.

    Small and medium-sized enterprises

    What business owners and CEOs are saying about their digital transformation

    57% of small business owners feel they must improve their IT infrastructure to optimize their operations.

    Source: SMB Story, 2023.

    64% of CEOs believe driving digital transformation at a rapid pace is critical to attracting and retaining talent and customers.

    Source: KPMG, 2022.

    Info-Tech Insight

    An IT infrastructure maturity assessment is a foundational step in the journey of digital transformation. The demand will be on performance, resilience, and scalability. IT infrastructure must be able to support innovation and rapid deployments.

    Effective IT Communications

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}429|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Lead
    • Parent Category Link: /lead

    IT communications are often considered ineffective. This is demonstrated by:

    • A lack of inclusion or time to present in board meetings.
    • Confusion around IT priorities and how they align to organizational objectives.
    • Segregating IT from the rest of the organization.
    • The inability to secure the necessary funding for IT-led initiatives.
    • IT employees not feeling supported or engaged.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • No one is born a good communicator. Every IT employee needs to spend the time and effort to grow their communication skills; with constant change and worsening IT crises, IT cannot afford to communicate poorly anymore.
    • The skills needed to communicate effectively as a front=line employee or CIO are the same. It is important to begin the development of these skills from the beginning of one's career.
    • Time is a non-renewable resource. Any communication needs to be considered valuable and engaging by the audience or they will be unforgiving.

    Impact and Result

    Communications is a responsibility of all members of IT. This is demonstrated through:

    • Engaging in two-way communications that are continuous and evolving.
    • Establishing a communications strategy – and following the plan.
    • Increasing the skills of all IT employees when it comes to communications.
    • Identifying audiences and their preferred means of communication.

    Effective IT Communications Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Effective IT Communications Capstone Deck – A resource center to ensure you never start communications from a blank page again.

    This capstone blueprint highlights the components, best practices, and importance of good communication for all IT employees.

    • Effective IT Communications Storyboard

    2. IT Townhall Template – A ready-to-use template to help you engage with IT employees and ensure consistent access to information.

    IT town halls must deliver value to employees, or they will withdraw and miss key messages. To engage employees, use well-crafted communications in an event that includes crowd-sourced contents, peer involvement, recognition, significant Q&A time allotment, organizational discussions, and goal alignment.

    • IT Townhall Template

    3. IT Year in Review Template – A ready-to-use template to help communicate IT successes and future objectives.

    This template provides a framework to build your own IT Year In Review presentation. An IT Year In Review presentation typically covers the major accomplishments, challenges, and initiatives of an organization's information technology (IT) department over the past year.

    • IT Year in Review Template

    Infographic

    Further reading

    Effective IT Communications

    Empower IT employees to communicate well with any stakeholder across the organization.

    Analyst perspective

    There has never been an expectation for IT to communicate well.

    Brittany Lutes

    Brittany Lutes
    Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Diana MacPherson

    Diana MacPherson
    Senior Research Analyst
    Info-Tech Research Group

    IT rarely engages in proper communications. We speak at, inform, or tell our audience what we believe to be important. But true communications seldom take place.

    Communications only occur when channels are created to ensure the continuous opportunity to obtain two-way feedback. It is a skill that is developed over time, with no individual having an innate ability to be better at communications. Each person in IT needs to work toward developing their personal communications style. The problem is we rarely invest in development or training related to communications. Information and technology fields spend time and money developing hard skills within IT, not soft ones.

    The benefits associated with communications are immense: higher business satisfaction, funding for IT initiatives, increased employee engagement, better IT to business alignment, and the general ability to form ongoing partnerships with stakeholders. So, for IT departments looking to obtain these benefits through true communications, develop the necessary skills.

    Executive summary

    Your Challenge Common Obstacles Info-Tech’s Approach
    IT communications are often considered ineffective. This is demonstrated by:
    • A lack of inclusion or time to present in board meetings.
    • Confusion around IT priorities and how they align to organizational objectives.
    • Segregating IT from the rest of the organization.
    • An inability to secure the necessary funding for IT-led initiatives.
    • IT employees not feeling supported or engaged.
    Frequently, these barriers have prevented IT communications from being effective:
    • Using technical jargon when a universal language is needed.
    • Speaking at organization stakeholders rather than engaging through dialogue.
    • Understanding the needs of the audience.
    Overall, IT has not been expected to engage in good communications or taken a proactive approach to communicate effectively.
    Communications is a responsibility of all members of IT. This is demonstrated through:
    • Engaging in two-way communications that are continuous and evolving.
    • Establishing a communications strategy – and following the plan.
    • Increasing the skills of all IT employees when it comes to communications.
    • Identifying audiences and their preferred means of communication.

    Info-Tech Insight
    No one is born a good communicator. Every IT employee needs to spend the time and effort to grow their communication skills as constant change and worsening IT crises mean that IT cannot afford to communicate poorly anymore.

    Your challenge

    Overall satisfaction with IT is correlated to satisfaction with IT communications

    Chart showing satisfaction with it and communications

    The bottom line? For every 10% increase in communications there 8.6% increase in overall IT satisfaction. Therefore, when IT communicates with the organization, stakeholders are more likely to be satisfied with IT overall.

    Info-Tech Diagnostic Programs, N=330 organizations

    IT struggles to communicate effectively with the organization:

    • CIOs are given minimal time to present to the board or executive leaders about IT’s value and alignment to business goals.
    • IT initiatives are considered complicated and confusing.
    • The frequency and impact of IT crises are under planned for, making communications more difficult during a major incident.
    • IT managers do not have the skills to communicate effectively with their team.
    • IT employees do not have the skills to communicate effectively with one another and end users.

    Common obstacles

    IT is prevented from communicating effectively due to these barriers:

    • Difficulty assessing the needs of the audience to inform the language and means of communication that should be used.
    • Using technical jargon rather than translating the communication into commonly understood terms.
    • Not receiving the training required to develop communication skills across IT employees.
    • Frequently speak at organization stakeholders rather than engaging through dialogue.
    • Beginning many communications from a blank page, especially crisis communications.
    • Difficulty presenting complex concepts in a short time to an audience in a digestible and concise manner without diluting the point.

    Effective IT communications are rare:

    53% of CXOs believe poor communication between business and IT is a barrier to innovation.
    Source: Info-Tech CEO-CIO Alignment Survey, 2022

    69% of those in management positions don’t feel comfortable even communicating with their staff.”
    Source: TeamStage, 2022

    Info-Tech’s approach

    Effective communications is not a broadcast but a dialogue between communicator and audience in a continuous feedback loop.

    Continuous loop of dialogue

    The Info-Tech difference:

    1. Always treat every communication as a dialogue, enabling the receiver of the message to raise questions, concerns, or ideas.
    2. Different audiences will require different communications. Be sure to cater the communication to the needs of the receiver(s).
    3. Never assume the communication was effective. Create measures and adjust the communications to get the desired outcome.

    Common IT communications

    And the less common but still important communications

    Communicating Up to Board or Executives

    • Board Presentations
    • Executive Leadership Committee Meetings
    • Technology Updates
    • Budget Updates
    • Risk Updates
    • Year in Review

    Communicating Across the Organization

    • Townhalls – external to IT
    • Year in Review
    • Crisis Email
    • Intranet Communication
    • Customer/Constituent Requests for Information
    • Product Launches
    • Email
    • Watercooler Chat

    Communicating Within IT

    • Townhalls – internal to IT
    • Employee 1:1s
    • Team Meetings
    • Project Updates
    • Project Collaboration Sessions
    • Year in Review
    • All-Hands Meeting
    • Employee Interview
    • Onboarding Documentation
    • Vendor Negotiation Meetings
    • Vendor Product Meetings
    • Email
    • Watercooler Chat

    Insight Summary

    Overarching insight
    IT cannot afford to communicate poorly given the overwhelming impact and frequency of change related to technology. Learn to communicate well or get out of the way of someone who can.

    Insight 1: The skills needed to communicate effectively as a frontline employee or a CIO are the same. It’s important to begin the development of these skills from the beginning of one’s career.
    Insight 2: Time is a non-renewable resource. Any communication needs to be considered valuable and engaging by the audience or they will be unforgiving.
    Insight 3: Don’t make data your star. It is a supporting character. People can argue about the collection methods or interpretation of the data, but they cannot argue the story you share.
    Insight 4: Measure if the communication is being received and resulting in the desired outcome. If not, modify what and how the message is being expressed.
    Insight 5: Messages are also non-verbal. Practice using your voice and body to set the right tone and impact your audience.

    Communication principles

    Follow these principles to support all IT communications.

    Two-Way

    Incorporate feedback loops into your communication efforts. Providing stakeholders with the opportunity to voice their opinions and ideas will help gain their commitment and buy-in.

    Timely

    Frequent communications mitigate rumors and the spread of misinformation. Provide warning before the implementation of any changes whenever possible. Communicate as soon as possible after decisions have been made.

    Consistent

    Make sure the messaging is consistent across departments, mediums, and presenters. Provide managers with key phrases to support the consistency of messages.

    Open & Honest

    Transparency is a critical component of communication. Always tell employees that you will share information as soon as you can. This may not be as soon as you receive the information but as soon as sharing it is acceptable.

    Authentic

    Write messages in a way that embodies the personality of the organization. Don’t spin information; position it within the wider organizational context.

    Targeted

    Use your target audience profiles to determine which audiences need to consume which messages and what mediums should be employed.

    Importance of IT being a good communicator

    Don’t pay the price for poor communication.

    IT needs to communicate well because:

    • IT risk mitigation and technology initiative funding are dependent on critical stakeholders comprehending the risk impact and initiative benefit in easy-to-understand terms.
    • IT employees need clear and direct information to feel empowered and accountable to do their jobs well.
    • End users who have a good experience engaging in communications with IT employees have an overall increase in satisfaction with IT.
    • Continuously demonstrating IT’s value to the organization comes when those initiatives are clearly aligned to overall objectives.
    • Communication prevents assumptions and further miscommunication from happening among IT employees who are usually impacted and fear change the most.

    “Poor communication results in employee misunderstanding and errors that cost approximately $37 billion.”
    – Intranet Connections, 2019

    Effective communication enables organizational strategy and facilitates a two-way exchange

    Effective communication facilitates a two-way exchange

    What makes internal communications effective?

    To be effective, internal communications must be strategic. They should directly support organizational objectives, reinforce key messages to make sure they drive action, and facilitate two-way dialogue, not just one-way messaging.

    Measure the value of the communication

    Communication effectiveness can be measured through a variety of metrics:

    • Increase in Productivity
    • “When employees are offered better communication technology and skills, productivity can increase by up to 30%” (Expert Market, 2022).
    • Increase in Understanding Decision Rationale
    • Employees who report understanding the rationale behind the business decisions made by the executive leadership team (ELT) are 3.6x more likely to be engaged, compared to those who were not (McLean & Company Engagement Survey Database, 2022; N=133,167 responses, 187 organizations).
    • Increase in Revenue
    • Collaboration amongst C-suite executives led to a 27% increase in revenue compared to low collaborating C-suites (IBM, 2021).
    • Increase in End-User Satisfaction
    • 80.9% of end users are satisfied with IT’s ability to communicate with them regarding the information they need to perform their job (Info-Tech’s End-User Satisfaction Survey Database, N=20,617 end users from 126 organizations).

    Methods to determine effectiveness:

    • CIO Business Vision Survey
    • Engagement surveys
    • Focus groups
    • Suggestion boxes
    • Team meetings
    • Random sampling
    • Informal feedback
    • Direct feedback
    • Audience body language
    • Repeating the message back

    How to navigate the research center

    This research center is intended to ensure that IT never starts their communications from a blank page again:

    Tools to help IT be better communicators

    “‘Effectiveness’ can mean different things, and effectiveness for your project is going to look different than it would for any other project.”
    – Gale McCreary in WikiHow, 2022

    Audience: Organizational leadership

    Speaking with Board and executive leaders about strategy, risk, and value

    Keep in mind:

    1 2 3
    Priorities Differ Words Matter The Power of Three
    What’s important to you as CIO is very different from what is important to a board or executive leadership team or even the individual members of these groups. Share only what is important or relevant to the stakeholder(s). Simplify the message into common language whenever possible. A good test is to ensure that someone without any technical background could understand the message. Keep every slide to three points with no more than three words. You are the one to translate this information into a worth-while story to share.

    “Today’s CIOs have a story to tell. They must change the old narrative and describe the art of the (newly) possible. A great leader rises to the occasion and shares a vision that inspires the entire organization.”
    – Dan Roberts, CIO, 2019

    Communications for board presentations

    Secure funding and demonstrate IT as a value add to business objectives.

    DEFINING INSIGHT

    Stop presenting what is important to you as the CIO and present to the board what is important to them.

    Why does IT need to communicate with the board?

    • To get their buy-in and funding for critical IT initiatives.
    • To ensure that IT risks are understood and receive the funding necessary to mitigate.
    • To change the narrative of IT as a service provider to a business enabler.

    FRAMEWORK

    Framework for board presentations

    CHECKLIST

    Do’s & Don’ts of Communicating Board Presentations:

    Do: Ensure you know all the members of the board and their strengths/areas of focus.

    Do: Ensure the IT objectives and initiatives align to the business objectives.

    Do: Avoid using any technical jargon.

    Do: Limit the amount of data you are using to present information. If it can’t stand alone, it isn’t a strong enough data point.

    Do: Avoid providing IT service metrics or other operational statistics.

    Do: Demonstrate how the organization’s revenue is impacted by IT activities.

    Do: Tell a story that is compelling and excited.

    OUTCOME

    Organization Alignment

    • Approved organization objectives and IT objectives are aligned and supporting one another.

    Stakeholder Buy-In

    • Board members all understand what the future state of IT will look like – and are excited for it!

    Awareness on Technology Trends

    • It is the responsibility of the CIO to ensure the board is aware of critical technology trends that can impact the future of the organization/industry.

    Risks

    • Risks are understood, the impact they could have on the organization is clear, and the necessary controls required to mitigate the risk are funded.

    Communications for business updates

    Continuously build strong relationships with all members of business leadership.

    DEFINING INSIGHT

    Business leaders care about themselves and their goals – present ideas and initiatives that lean into this self-interest.

    Why does IT need to communicate business updates?

    • The key element here is to highlight how IT is impacting the organization’s overall ability to meet goals and targets.
    • Ensure all executive leaders know about and understand IT’s upcoming initiatives – and how they will be involved.

    FRAMEWORK

    Framework for business updates

    CHECKLIST

    Do’s & Don’ts of Communicating Business Updates:

    Do: Ensure IT is given sufficient time to present with the rest of the business leaders.

    Do: Ensure the goals of IT are clear and can be depicted visually.

    Do: Tie every IT goal to the objectives of different business leaders.

    Do: Avoid using any technical jargon.

    Do: Reinforce the positive benefits business leaders can expect.

    Do: Avoid providing IT service metrics or other operational statistics.

    Do: Demonstrate how IT is driving the digital transformation of the organization.

    OUTCOME

    Better Reputation

    • Get other business leaders to see IT as a value add to any initiative, making IT an enabler not an order taker.

    Executive Buy-In

    • Executives are concerned about their own budgets; they want to embrace all the innovation but within reason and minimal impact to their own finances.

    Digital Transformation

    • Indicate and commit to how IT can help the different leaders deliver on their digital transformation activities.

    Relationship Building

    • Establish trust with the different leaders so they want to engage with you on a regular basis.

    Audience: Organization wide

    Speaking with all members of the organization about the future of technology – and unexpected crises.

    1 2 3
    Competing to Be Heard Measure Impact Enhance the IT Brand
    IT messages are often competing with a variety of other communications simultaneously taking place in the organization. Avoid the information-overload paradox by communicating necessary, timely, and relevant information. Don’t underestimate the benefit of qualitative feedback that comes from talking to people within the organization. Ensure they read/heard and absorbed the communication. IT might be a business enabler, but if it is never communicated as such to the organization, it will only be seen as a support function. Use purposeful communications to change the IT narrative.

    Less than 50% of internal communications lean on a proper framework to support their communication activities.
    – Philip Nunn, iabc, 2020

    Communications for strategic IT initiatives

    Communicate IT’s strategic objectives with all business stakeholders and users.

    DEFINING INSIGHT

    IT leaders struggle to communicate how the IT strategy is aligned to the overall business objectives using a common language understood by all.

    Why does IT need to communicate its strategic objectives?

    • To ensure a clear and consistent view of IT strategic objectives can be understood by all stakeholders within the organization.
    • To demonstrate that IT strategic objectives are aligned with the overall mission and vision of the organization.

    FRAMEWORK

    Framework for IT strategic initiatives

    CHECKLIST

    Do’s & Don’ts of Communicating IT Strategic Objectives:

    Do: Ensure all IT leaders are aware of and understand the objectives in the IT strategy.

    Do: Ensure there is a visual representation of IT’s goals.

    Do: Ensure the IT objectives and initiatives align to the business objectives.

    Do: Avoid using any technical jargon.

    Do: Provide metrics if they are relevant, timely, and immediately understandable.

    Do: Avoid providing IT service metrics or other operational statistics.

    Do: Demonstrate how the future of the organization will benefit from IT initiatives.

    OUTCOME

    Organization Alignment

    • All employees recognize the IT strategy as being aligned, even embedded, into the overall organization strategy.

    Stakeholder Buy-In

    • Business and IT stakeholders alike understand what the future state of IT will look like – and are excited for it!

    Role Clarity

    • Employees within IT are clear on how their day-to-day activities impact the overall objectives of the organization.

    Demonstrate Growth

    • Focus on where IT is going to be maturing in the coming one to two years and how this will benefit all employees.

    Communications for crisis management

    Minimize the fear and chaos with transparent communications.

    DEFINING INSIGHT

    A crisis communication should fit onto a sticky note. If it’s not clear, concise, and reassuring, it won’t be effectively understood by the audience.

    Why does IT need to communicate when a crisis occurs?

    • To ensure all members of the organization have an understanding of what the crisis is, how impactful that crisis is, and when they can expect more information.
    • “Half of US companies don’t have a crisis communication plan” (CIO, 2017).

    FRAMEWORK

    Framework for crisis management

    CHECKLIST

    Do’s & Don’ts of Communicating During a Crisis:

    Do: Provide timely and regular updates about the crisis to all stakeholders.

    Do: Involve the Board or ELT immediately for transparency.

    Do: Avoid providing too much information in a crisis communication.

    Do: Have crisis communication statements ready to be shared at any time for possible or common IT crises.

    Do: Highlight that employee safety and wellbeing is top priority.

    Do: Work with members of the public relations team to prepare any external communications that might be required.

    OUTCOME

    Ready to Act

    • Holding statements for possible crises will eliminate the time and effort required when the crisis does occur.

    Reduce Fears

    • Prevent employees from spreading concerns and not feeling included in the crisis.

    Maintain Trust

    • Ensure Board and ELT members trust IT to respond in an appropriate manner to any crisis or major incident.

    Eliminate Negative Reactions

    • Any crisis communication should be clear and concise enough when done via email.

    Audience: IT employees

    IT employees need to receive and obtain regular transparent communications to better deliver on their expectations.

    Keep in mind:

    1 2 3
    Training for All Listening Is Critical Reinforce Collaboration
    From the service desk technician to CIO, every person within IT needs to have a basic ability to communicate. Invest in the training necessary to develop this skill set. It seems simple, but as humans we do an innately poor job at listening to others. It’s important you hear employee concerns, feedback, and recommendations, enabling the two-way aspect of communication. IT employees will reflect the types of communications they see. If IT leaders and managers cannot collaborate together, then teams will also struggle, leading to productivity and quality losses.

    “IT professionals who […] enroll in communications training have a chance to both upgrade their professional capabilities and set themselves apart in a crowded field of technology specialists.”
    – Mark Schlesinger, Forbes, 2021

    Communications for IT activities and tactics

    Get IT employees aligned and clear on their daily objectives.

    DEFINING INSIGHT

    Depending on IT goals, the structure might need to change to support better communication among IT employees.

    Why does IT need to communicate IT activities?

    • To ensure all members of the project team are aligned with their tasks and responsibilities related to the project.
    • To be able to identify, track, and mitigate any problems that are preventing the successful delivery of the project.

    FRAMEWORK

    Framework for IT activities & tactics

    CHECKLIST

    Do’s & Don’ts of Communicating IT Activities:

    Do: Provide metrics that define how success of the project will be measured.

    Do: Demonstrate how each project aligns to the overarching objectives of the organization.

    Do: Avoid having large meetings that include stakeholders from two or more projects.

    Do: Consistently create a safe space for employees to communicate risks related to the project(s).

    Do: Ensure the right tools are being leveraged for in-office, hybrid, and virtual environments to support project collaboration.

    Do: Leverage a project management software to reduce unnecessary communications.

    OUTCOME

    Stakeholder Adoption

    • Create a standard communication template so stakeholders can easily find and apply communications.

    Resource Allocation

    • Understand what the various asks of IT are so employees can be adequately assigned to tasks.

    Meet Responsibly

    • Project status meetings are rarely valuable or insightful. Use meetings for collaboration, troubleshooting, and knowledge sharing.

    Encourage Engagement

    • Recognize employees and their work against critical milestones, especially for projects that have a long timeline.

    Communications for everyday IT

    Engage employees and drive results with clear and consistent communications.

    DEFINING INSIGHT

    Employees are looking for empathy to be demonstrated by those they are interacting with, from their peers to managers. Yet, we rarely provide it.

    Why does IT need to communicate on regularly with itself?

    • Regular communication ensures employees are valued, empowered, and clear about their expectations.
    • 97% of employees believe that their ability to perform their tasks efficiently is impacted by communication (Expert Market, 2022).

    FRAMEWORK

    Framework for everyday IT

    CHECKLIST

    Do’s & Don’ts of Communicating within IT:

    Do: Have responses for likely questions prepared and ready to go.

    Do: Ensure that all leaders are sharing the same messages with their teams.

    Do: Avoid providing irrelevant or confusing information.

    Do: Speak with your team on a regular basis.

    Do: Reinforce the messages of the organization every chance possible.

    Do: Ensure employees feel empowered to do their jobs effectively.

    Do: Engage employees in dialogue. The worst employee experience is when they are only spoken at, not engaged with.

    OUTCOME

    Increased Collaboration

    • Operating in a vacuum or silo is no longer an option. Enable employees to successfully collaborate and deliver holistic results.

    Role Clarity

    • Clear expectations and responsibilities eliminate confusion and blame game. Engage employees and create a positive work culture with role clarity.

    Prevent Rumors

    • Inconsistent communication often leads to information sharing and employees spreading an (in)accurate narrative.

    Organizational Insight

    • Employees trust the organization’s direction because they are aware of the different activities taking place and provided with a rationale about decisions.

    Case Study

    Amazon

    INDUSTRY
    E-Commerce

    SOURCE
    Harvard Business Review

    Jeff Bezos has definitely taken on unorthodox approaches to business and leadership, but one that many might not know about is his approach to communication. Some of the key elements that he focused on in the early 2000s when Amazon was becoming a multi-billion-dollar empire included:

    • Banning PowerPoint for all members of the leadership team. They had to learn to communicate without the crutch of the most commonly used presentation tool.
    • Leveraging memos that included specific action steps and clear nouns
    • Reducing all communication to an eighth-grade reading level, including pitches for new products (e.g. Kindle).

    Results

    While he was creating the Amazon empire, 85% of Jeff Bezos’ communication was written in a way that an eighth grader could read. Communicating in a way that was easy to understand and encouraging his leadership team to do so as well is one of the many reasons this business has grown to an estimated value of over $800B.

    “If you cannot simplify a message and communicate it compellingly, believe me, you cannot get the masses to follow you.”
    – Indra Nooyi, in Harvard Business Review, 2022

    Communication competency expectations

    Communication is a business skill; not a technical skill.

    Demonstrated Communication Behavior
    Level 1: Follow Has sufficient communication skills for effective dialogue with others.
    Level 2: Assist Has sufficient communication skills for effective dialogue with customers, suppliers, and partners.
    Level 3: Apply Demonstrates effective communication skills.
    Level 4: Enable Communicates fluently, orally, and in writing and can present complex information to both technical and non-technical audiences.
    Level 5: Ensure, Advise Communicates effectively both formally and informally.
    Level 6: Initiate, Influence Communicates effectively at all levels to both technical and non-technical audiences.
    Level 7: Set Strategy, Inspire, Mobilize Understands, explains, and presents complex ideas to audiences at all levels in a persuasive and convincing manner.

    Source: Skills Framework for the Information Age, 2021

    Key KPIs for communication with any stakeholder

    Measuring communication is hard; use these to determine effectiveness.

    Goal Key Performance Indicator (KPI) Related Resource
    Obtain board buy-in for IT strategic initiatives X% of IT initiatives that were approved to be funded. Number of times technical initiatives were asked to be explained further. Using our Board Presentation Review service
    Establish stronger relationships with executive leaders X% of business leadership satisfied with the statement “IT communicates with your group effectively.” Using the CIO Business Vision Diagnostic
    Organizationally, people know what products and services IT provides X% of end users who are satisfied with communications around changing services or applications. Using the End-User Satisfaction Survey
    Organizational reach and understanding of the crisis. Number of follow-up tickets or requests related to the crisis after the initial crisis communication was sent. Using templates and tools for crisis communications
    Project stakeholders receive sufficient communication throughout the initiative. X% overall satisfaction with the quality of the project communications. Using the PPM Customer Satisfaction Diagnostic
    Employee feedback is provided, heard, and acted on X% of satisfaction employees have with managers or IT leadership to act on employee feedback. Using the Employee Engagement Diagnostic Program

    Standard workshop communication activities

    Introduction
    Communications overview.

    Plan
    Plan your communications using a strategic tool.

    Compose
    Create your own message.

    Deliver
    Practice delivering your own message.

    Contact your account representative for more information. workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Research contributors and experts

    Anuja Agrawal, National Communications Director, PwC

    Anuja Agrawal
    National Communications Director
    PwC

    Anuja is an accomplished global communications professional, with extensive experience in the insurance, banking, financial, and professional services industries in Asia, the US, and Canada. She is currently the National Communications Director at PwC Canada. Her prior work experience includes communication leadership roles at Deutsche Bank, GE, Aviva, and Veritas. Anuja works closely with senior business leaders and key stakeholders to deliver measurable results and effective change and culture building programs. Anuja has experience in both internal and external communications, including strategic leadership communication, employee engagement, PR and media management, digital and social media, and M&A/change and crisis management. Anuja believes in leveraging digital tools and technology-enabled solutions, combined with in-person engagement, to help improve the quality of dialogue and increase interactive communication within the organization to help build an inclusive culture of belonging.

    Nastaran Bisheban, Chief Technology Officer, KFC Canada

    Nastaran Bisheban
    Chief Technology Officer
    KFC Canada

    A passionate technologist, and seasoned transformational leader. A software engineer and computer scientist by education, a certified Project Manager that holds an MBA in Leadership with Honors and Distinction from University of Liverpool. A public speaker on various disciplines of technology and data strategy with a Harvard Business School executive leadership program training to round it all. Challenges status quo and conventional practices; is an advocate for taking calculated risk and following the principle of continuous improvement. With multiple computer software and project management publications she is a strategic mentor and board member on various non-profit organizations. Nastaran sees the world as a better place only when everyone has a seat at the table and is an active advocate for diversity and inclusion.

    Heidi Davidson, Co-Founder & CEO, Galvanize Worldwide and Galvanize On Demand

    Heidi Davidson
    Co-Founder & CEO
    Galvanize Worldwide and Galvanize On Demand

    Dr. Heidi Davidson is the co-founder and CEO of Galvanize Worldwide, the largest distributed network of marketing and communications experts in the world. She also is the co-founder and CEO of Galvanize On Demand, a tech platform that matches marketing and communications freelancers with client projects. Now with 167 active experts, the Galvanize team delivers startup advisory work, outsourced marketing, training, and crisis communications to organizations of all sizes. Before Galvanize, Heidi spent four years as part of the turnaround team at BlackBerry as the Chief Communications Officer and SVP of Corporate Marketing, where she helped the company move from a device manufacturer to a security software provider.

    Eli Gladstone, Co-Founder, Speaker Labs

    Eli Gladstone
    Co-Founder
    Speaker Labs

    Eli is a co-founder of Speaker Labs. He has spent over six years helping countless individuals overcome their public speaking fears and communicate with clarity and confidence. When he’s not coaching others on how to build and deliver the perfect presentation, you’ll probably find him reading some weird books, teaching his kids how to ski or play tennis, or trying to develop a good-enough jumpshot to avoid being a liability on the basketball court.

    Francisco Mahfuz, Keynote Speaker & Storytelling Coach

    Francisco Mahfuz
    Keynote Speaker & Storytelling Coach

    Francisco Mahfuz has been telling stories in front of audiences for a decade and even became a National Champion of public speaking. Today, Francisco is a keynote speaker and storytelling coach and offers communication training to individuals and international organizations and has worked with organizations like Pepsi, HP, the United Nations, Santander, and Cornell University. He’s the author of Bare: A Guide to Brutally Honest Public Speaking and the host of The Storypowers Podcast, and he’s been part of the IESE MBA communications course since 2020. He’s received a BA in English Literature from Birkbeck University in London.

    Sarah Shortreed, EVP & CTO, ATCO Ltd.

    Sarah Shortreed
    EVP & CTO
    ATCO Ltd.

    Sarah Shortreed is ATCO’s Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer. Her responsibilities include leading ATCO’s Information Technology (IT) function as it continues to drive agility and collaboration throughout ATCO’s global businesses and expanding and enhancing its enterprise IT strategy, including establishing ATCO’s technology roadmap for the future. Ms. Shortreed’s skill and expertise are drawn from her more than 30-year career that spans many industries and includes executive roles in business consulting, complex multi-stakeholder programs, operations, sales, customer relationship management, and product management. She was recently the Chief Information Officer at Bruce Power and has previously worked at BlackBerry, IBM, and Union Gas. She sits on the Board of Governors for the University of Western Ontario and is the current Chair of the Chief Information Officer (CIO) Committee at the Conference Board of Canada.

    Eric Silverberg, Co-Founder, Speaker Labs

    Eric Silverberg
    Co-Founder
    Speaker Labs

    Eric is a co-founder of Speaker Labs and has helped thousands of people build their public speaking confidence and become more dynamic and engaging communicators. When he’s not running workshops to help people grow in their careers, there’s a good chance you’ll find him with his wife and dog, drinking Diet Coke, and rewatching iconic episodes of the reality TV show Survivor! He’s such a die-hard fan, that you’ll probably see him playing the game one day.

    Stephanie Stewart, Communications Officer & DR Coordinator, Info Security Services Simon Fraser University

    Stephanie Stewart
    Communications Officer & DR Coordinator
    Info Security Services Simon Fraser University

    Steve Strout, President, Miovision Technologies

    Steve Strout
    President
    Miovision Technologies

    Mr. Strout is a recognized and experienced technology leader with extensive experience in delivering value. He has successfully led business and technology transformations by leveraging many dozens of complex global SFDC, Oracle, and SAP projects. He is especially adept at leading what some call “Project Rescues” – saving people’s careers where projects have gone awry; always driving “on-time and on-budget.” Mr. Strout is the current President of Miovision Technologies and the former CEO and board member of the Americas’ SAP Users” Group (ASUG). His wealth of practical knowledge comes from 30 years of extensive experience in many CxO and executive roles at some prestigious organizations such as Vonage, Sabre, BlackBerry, Shred-it, The Thomson Corporation (now Thomson Reuters), and Morris Communications. He has served on boards including Customer Advisory Boards of Apple, AgriSource Data, Dell, Edgewise, EMC, LogiSense, Socrates.ai, Spiro Carbon Group, and Unifi.

    Info-Tech Research Group Contributors:

    Sanchia Benedict, Research Lead
    Antony Chan Executive Counsellor
    Janice Clatterbuck, Executive Counsellor
    Ahmed Jowar, Research Specialist
    Dave Kish, Practice Lead
    Nick Kozlo, Senior Research Analyst
    Heather Leier Murray, Senior Research Analyst
    Amanda Mathieson, Research Director
    Carlene McCubbin, Practice Lead
    Joe Meier, Executive Counsellor
    Andy Neill, AVP Research
    Thomas Randall, Research Director

    Plus an additional two contributors who wish to remain anonymous.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Boardroom Presentation Review

    • You will come away with a clear, concise, and compelling board presentation that IT leaders can feel confident presenting in front of their board of directors.
    • Add improvements to your current board presentation in terms of visual appeal and logical flow to ensure it resonates with your board of directors.
    • Leverage a best-of-breed presentation template.

    Build a Better Manager

    • Management skills training is needed, but organizations are struggling to provide training that makes a long-term difference in the skills managers actually use in their day to day.
    • Many training programs are ineffective because they offer the wrong content, deliver it in a way that is not memorable, and are not aligned with the IT department’s business objectives.

    Crisis Communication Guides

    During a crisis it is important to communicate to employees through messages that convey calm and are transparent and tailored to your audience. Use the Crisis Communication Guides to:

    • Draft a communication strategy.
    • Tailor messages to your audience.
    • Draft employee crisis communications.
    Use this guide to equip leadership to communicate in times of crisis.

    Bibliography

    “Communication in the Workplace Statistics: Importance and Effectiveness in 2022.” TeamStage, 2022.

    Gallo, Carmine. “How Great Leaders Communicate.” Harvard Business Review, 23 November 2022

    Guthrie, Georgina. “Why Good Internal Communications Matter Now More than Ever.” Nulab, 15 December 2021.

    Lambden, Duncan. “The Importance of Effective Workplace Communication – Statistics for 2022.” Expert Market, 13 June 2022.

    “Mapping SFIA Levels of Responsibilities to Behavioural Factors.” Skills Framework for the Information Age, 2021.

    McCreary, Gale. “How to Measure the Effectiveness of Communication: 14 Steps.” WikiHow, 31 March 2023.

    Nowak, Marcin. “Top 7 Communication Problems in the Workplace.” MIT Enterprise Forum CEE, 2021.

    Nunn, Philip. “Messaging That Works: A Unique Framework to Maximize Communication Success.” iabc, 26 October 2020.

    Picincu, Andra. “How to Measure Effective Communications.” Small Business Chron. 12 January 2021.

    Price. David A. “Pixar Story Rules.” Stories From the Frontiers of Knowledge, 2011.

    Roberts, Dan. “How CIOs Become Visionary Communicators.” CIO, 2019.

    Schlesinger, Mark. “Why building effective communication skill in IT is incredibly important.” Forbes, 2021.

    Stanten, Andrew. “Planning for the Worst: Crisis Communications 101.” CIO, 25 May 2017.

    State of the American Workplace Report. Gallup, 6 February 2020.

    “The CIO Revolution.” IBM, 2021.

    “The State of High Performing Teams in Tech 2022.” Hypercontex, 2022.

    Walters, Katlin. “Top 5 Ways to Measure Internal Communication.” Intranet Connections, 30 May 2019.

    Excel Through COVID-19 With a Focused Business Architecture

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}604|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve.
    • member rating average days saved: Read what our members are saying
    • Parent Category Name: Strategy & Operating Model
    • Parent Category Link: /strategy-and-operating-model
    • Business architecture, including value stream and business capability models, is the tool you need to reposition your organization for post-COVID-19 success.
    • Your business architecture model represents your strategic business components. It guides the development of all other architectures to enable new and improved business function.
    • Evaluating your current business architecture, or indeed rebuilding it, creates a foundation for facilitated discussions and target state alignment between IT and the senior C-suite.
    • New projects and initiatives during COVID-19 must evolve business architecture so that your front-line workers and your customers are supported through the resolution of the pandemic. Specifically, your projects and initiatives must be directly traced to evolving your architecture.
    • Business architecture anchors downstream architectural iterations and initiatives. Measure business capability enablement results directly from projects and initiatives using a business architecture model.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Focus on your most disruptive, game-changing innovations that have been on the backburner for some time. Here you will find the ingredients for post-pandemic success.

    Impact and Result

    • Craft your business architecture model, aligned to the current climate, to refocus on your highest priority goals and increase your chances of post-COVID-19 excellence.

    Excel Through COVID-19 With a Focused Business Architecture Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Create minimum viable business architecture

    Create your minimum viable business architecture.

    • Excel Through COVID-19 With a Focused Business Architecture Storyboard
    • Excel Through COVID-19 With a Focused Business Architecture – Healthcare
    • Excel Through COVID-19 With a Focused Business Architecture – Higher Education
    • Excel Through COVID-19 With a Focused Business Architecture – Manufacturing
    • Business Capability Modeling

    2. Identify COVID-19 critical capabilities for your industry

    If there are a handful of capabilities that your business needs to focus on right now, what are they?

    3. Brainstorm COVID-19 business opportunities

    Identify business opportunities.

    4. Enrich capability model with COVID-19 opportunities

    Enrich your capability model.

    [infographic]

    Build an IT Employee Engagement Program

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}544|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.2/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $5,734 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 8 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Engage
    • Parent Category Link: /engage
    • IT’s performance and stakeholder satisfaction with IT services hinge on IT’s ability to attract and retain top talent and to motivate teams to go above and beyond.
    • With the growing IT job market, turnover is a serious threat to IT’s ability to deliver seamless value and continuously drive innovation.
    • Engagement initiatives are often seen as being HR’s responsibility; however, IT leadership needs to take accountability for the retention and productivity of their employees in order to drive business value.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Engagement is a two-way street. Initiatives must address a known need and be actively sought by employees – not handed down from management.
    • Engagement initiatives are useless unless they target the right issues. It can be tempting to focus on the latest perks and gadgets and ignore difficult issues. Use a systematic approach to uncover and tackle the real problems.
    • It’s time for IT leadership to step up. IT leaders have a much bigger impact on IT staff engagement than HR ever can. Leverage this power to lead your team to peak performance.

    Impact and Result

    • Info-Tech engagement diagnostics and accompanying tools will help you perform a deep dive into the root causes of disengagement on your team.
    • The guidance that accompanies Info-Tech’s tools will help you avoid common engagement program pitfalls and empower IT leaders to take charge of their own team’s engagement.

    Build an IT Employee Engagement Program Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to discover why engagement is critical to IT performance, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand how our tools will help you construct an effective employee engagement program.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Measure employee engagement

    Use Info-Tech's Pulse or Full Engagement Surveys to measure employee engagement.

    • Improve Employee Engagement to Drive IT Performance – Phase 1: Measure Employee Engagement
    • Engagement Strategy Record
    • Engagement Communication Template

    2. Analyze results and ideate solutions

    Understand the drivers of engagement that are important for your team, and involve your staff in brainstorming engagement initiatives.

    • Improve Employee Engagement to Drive IT Performance – Phase 2: Analyze Results and Ideate Solutions
    • Engagement Survey Results Interpretation Guide
    • Full Engagement Survey Focus Group Facilitation Guide
    • Pulse Engagement Survey Focus Group Facilitation Guide
    • Focus Group Facilitation Guide Driver Definitions
    • One-on-One Manager Meeting Worksheet

    3. Select and implement engagement initiatives

    Select engagement initiatives for maximal impact, create an action plan, and establish open and ongoing communication about engagement with your team.

    • Improve Employee Engagement to Drive IT Performance – Phase 3: Select and Implement Engagement Initiatives
    • Summary of Interdepartmental Engagement Initiatives
    • Engagement Progress One-Pager
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Build an IT Employee Engagement Program

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 (Preparation) Run Engagement Survey

    The Purpose

    Select and run your engagement survey prior to the workshop.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Receive an in-depth report on your team’s engagement drivers to form the basis of your engagement strategy.

    Activities

    1.1 Select engagement survey.

    1.2 Identify engagement program goals and metrics.

    1.3 Run engagement survey.

    Outputs

    Full or Pulse engagement survey report

    Engagement survey results interpretation guide

    2 Explore Engagement

    The Purpose

    To understand the current state of engagement and prepare to discuss the drivers behind it with your staff.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Empower your leadership team to take charge of their own teams’ engagement.

    Activities

    2.1 Review engagement survey results.

    2.2 Finalize focus group agendas.

    2.3 Train managers.

    Outputs

    Customized focus group agendas

    3 Hold Focus Groups

    The Purpose

    Establish an open dialogue with your staff to understand what would improve their engagement.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Employee-generated initiatives have the greatest chance at success.

    Activities

    3.1 Identify priority drivers.

    3.2 Identify engagement KPIs.

    3.3 Brainstorm engagement initiatives.

    3.4 Vote on initiatives within teams.

    Outputs

    Summary of focus groups results

    Identified engagement initiatives

    Identified engagement initiatives

    4 Select and Plan Initiatives

    The Purpose

    Learn the characteristics of successful engagement initiatives and build execution plans for each.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Choose initiatives with the greatest impact on your team’s engagement, and ensure you have the necessary resources for success.

    Activities

    4.1 Select engagement initiatives with IT leadership.

    4.2 Create initiative project plans.

    4.3 Present project plans.

    4.4 Define implementation checkpoints.

    4.5 Develop communications plan.

    4.6 Define strategy for ongoing engagement monitoring.

    Outputs

    Engagement project plans

    Implementation and communication checkpoints

    Further surveys planned (optional)

    5 Additional Leadership Training

    The Purpose

    Select training modules that best address your team’s needs from Info-Tech’s modular leadership training program.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Arm your IT leadership team with the key skills of effective leadership, tailored to their existing experience level.

    Activities

    5.1 Adopting an Integrated Leadership Mindset

    5.2 Optimizing Talent Leadership Practices

    5.3 Driving Diversity & Inclusion

    5.4 Fortifying Internal Stakeholder Relations

    5.5 Engaging Executives and the Board

    5.6 Crafting Your Leadership Brand

    5.7 Crafting and Delivering Compelling Presentations

    5.8 Communication & Difficult Conversations

    5.9 Conflict Management

    5.10 Performance Management

    5.11 Feedback & Coaching

    5.12 Creating a Culture of Personal Accountability

    Outputs

    Develop the skills to lead resourcefully in times of uncertainty

    Apply leadership behaviors across enterprise initiatives to deploy and develop talent successfully

    Develop diversity and inclusion practices that turn the IT function and leaders into transformative champions of inclusion

    Identify elements of effective partnering to maximize the impact of internal interactions

    Understand the major obstacles to CEO and board relevance and uncover the keys to elevating your internal executive profile

    Develop a leadership brand statement that demonstrates leadership competency and is aligned with the brand, mission, vision, and goals of the organization

    Identify the components of effective presentations and hone your presentation skills

    Gain the skills to confront and drive solutions from difficult situations

    Develop strategies to engage in conflict constructively and reach a resolution that benefits the team or organization

    Learn to identify the root causes of low performance and develop the skills to guide employees through the process of improvement

    Adopt a behavior-focused coaching model to help managers sustain and apply effective coaching principles

    Understand how and when to encourage autonomy and how to empower employees to take success into their own hands

    Manage Poor Performance While Working From Home

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}599|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $1,600 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 18 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Manage & Coach
    • Parent Category Link: /manage-coach
    • For many, emergency WFH comes with several new challenges such as additional childcare responsibilities, sudden changes in role expectations, and negative impacts on wellbeing. These new challenges, coupled with previously existing ones, can result in poor performance. Owing to the lack of physical presence and cues, managers may struggle to identify that an employee’s performance is suffering. Even after identifying poor performance, it can be difficult to address remotely when such conversations would ideally be held in person.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Poor performance must be managed, despite the pandemic. Evaluating root causes of performance issues is more important than ever now that personal factors such as lack of childcare and eldercare for those working from home are complicating the issue.

    Impact and Result

    • Organizations need to have a clear process for improving performance for employees working remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic. Provide managers with resources to help them identify performance issues and uncover their root causes as part of addressing overall performance. This will allow managers to connect employees with the required support while working with them to improve performance.

    Manage Poor Performance While Working From Home Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Follow the remote performance improvement process

    Determine how managers can identify poor performance remotely and help them navigate the performance improvement process while working from home.

    • Manage Poor Performance While Working From Home Storyboard
    • Manage Poor Performance While Working From Home: Manager Guide
    • Manage Poor Performance While Working From Home: Infographic

    2. Clarify roles and leverage resources

    Clarify roles and responsibilities in the performance improvement process and tailor relevant resources.

    • Wellness and Working From Home
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Manage Poor Performance While Working From Home

    Assess and improve remote work performance with our ready-to-use tools.

    Executive Summary

    McLean & Company Insight

    Poor performance must be managed, despite the pandemic. Evaluating root causes of performance issues is more important than ever now that personal factors such as lack of childcare and eldercare for those working from home are complicating the issue.

    Situation

    COVID-19 has led to a sudden shift to working from home (WFH), resulting in a 72% decline in in-office work (Ranosa, 2020). While these uncertain times have disrupted traditional work routines, employee performance remains critical, as it plays a role in determining how organizations recover. Managers must not turn a blind eye to performance issues but rather must act quickly to support employees who may be struggling.

    Complication

    For many, emergency WFH comes with several new challenges such as additional childcare responsibilities, sudden changes in role expectations, and negative impacts on wellbeing. These new challenges, coupled with previously existing ones, can result in poor performance. Owing to the lack of physical presence and cues, managers may struggle to identify that an employee’s performance is suffering. Even after identifying poor performance, it can be difficult to address remotely when such conversations would ideally be held in person.

    Solution

    Organizations need to have a clear process for improving performance for employees working remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic. Provide managers with resources to help them identify performance issues and uncover their root causes as part of addressing overall performance. This will allow managers to connect employees with the required support while working with them to improve performance.

    Manage Poor Performance While Working From Home is made up of the following resources:

    1

    Identify

    2

    Initiate

    3

    Deploy

    4

    a) Follow Up
    b) Decide
    Storyboard

    This storyboard is organized by the four steps of the performance improvement process: identify, initiate, deploy, and follow up/decide. These will appear on the left-hand side of the slides as a roadmap.

    The focus is on how HR can design the process for managing poor performance remotely and support managers through it while emergency WFH measures are in place. Key responsibilities, email templates, and relevant resources are included at the end.

    Adapt the process as necessary for your organization.

    Manager Guide

    The manager guide contains detailed advice for managers on navigating the process and focuses on the content of remote performance discussions.

    It consists of the following sections:

    • Identifying poor performance.
    • Conducting performance improvement discussions.
    • Uncovering and addressing root causes of poor performance.
    Manager Infographic

    The manager infographic illustrates the high-level steps of the performance improvement process for managers in a visually appealing and easily digestible manner.

    This can be used to easily outline the process, providing managers with a resource to quickly reference as they navigate the process with their direct reports.

    In this blueprint, “WFH” and “remote working” are used interchangeably.

    This blueprint will not cover the performance management framework; it is solely focused on managing performance issues.

    For information on adjusting the regular performance management process during the pandemic, see Performance Management for Emergency Work-From-Home.

    Identify how low performance is normally addressed

    A process for performance improvement is not akin to outlining the steps of a performance improvement plan (PIP). The PIP is a development tool used within a larger process for performance improvement. Guidance on how to structure and use a PIP will be provided later in this blueprint.

    Evaluate how low performance is usually brought to the attention of HR in a non-remote situation:
    • Do managers approach HR for an employee transfer or PIP without having prior performance conversations with the employee?
    • Do managers come to HR when they need support in developing an employee in order to meet expectations?
    • Do managers proactively reach out to HR to discuss appropriate L&D for staff who are struggling?
    • Do some departments engage with the process while others do not?
    Poor performance does not signal the immediate need to terminate an employee. Instead, managers should focus on helping the struggling employee to develop so that they may succeed.
    Evaluate how poor performance is determined:
    • Do managers use performance data or concrete examples?
    • Is it based on a subjective assessment by the manager?
    Keep in mind that “poor performance” now might look different than it did before the pandemic. Employees must be aware of the current expectations placed on them before they can be labeled as underperforming – and the performance expectations must be assessed to ensure they are realistic.

    For information on adjusting performance expectations during the pandemic, see Performance Management for Emergency Work-From-Home.

    The process for non-union and union employees will likely differ. Make sure your process for unionized employees aligns with collective agreements.

    Determine how managers can identify poor performance of staff working remotely

    1

    Identify

    2

    Initiate

    3

    Deploy

    4

    a) Follow Up
    b) Decide
    Identify: Determine how managers can identify poor performance.
    In person, it can be easy to see when an employee is struggling by glancing over at their desk and observing body language. In a remote situation, this can be more difficult, as it is easy to put on a brave face for the half-hour to one-hour check-in. Advise managers on how important frequent one-one-ones and open communication are in helping identify issues when they arise rather than when it’s too late.

    Managers must clearly document and communicate instances where employees aren’t meeting role expectations or are showing other key signs that they are not performing at the level expected of them.

    What to look for:
    • PM data/performance-related assessments
    • Continual absences
    • Decreased quality or quantity of output
    • Frequent excuses (e.g. repeated internet outages)
    • Lack of effort or follow-through
    • Missed deadlines
    • Poor communication or lack of responsiveness
    • Failure to improve
    It’s crucial to acknowledge an employee might have an “off week” or need time to adjust to working from home, which can be addressed with performance management techniques. Managers should move into the process for performance improvement when:
    • Performance fluctuates frequently or significantly.
    • Performance has dropped for an extended period of time.
    • Expectations are consistently not being met.

    While it’s important for managers to keep an eye out for decreased performance, discourage them from over-monitoring employees, as this can lead to a damaging environment of distrust.

    Support managers in initiating performance conversations and uncovering root causes

    1

    Identify

    2

    Initiate

    3

    Deploy

    4

    a) Follow Up
    b) Decide
    Initiate: Require that managers have several conversations about low performance with the employee.
    Before using more formal measures, ensure managers take responsibility for connecting with the employee to have an initial performance conversation where they will make the performance issue known and try to diagnose the root cause of the issue.

    Coach managers to recognize behaviors associated with the following performance inhibitors:

    Personal Factors

    Personal factors, usually outside the workplace, can affect an employee’s performance.

    Lack of clarity

    Employees must be clear on performance expectations before they can be labeled as a poor performer.

    Low motivation

    Lack of motivation to complete work can impact the quality of output and/or amount of work an employee is completing.

    Inability

    Resourcing, technology, organizational change, or lack of skills to do the job can all result in the inability of an employee to perform at their best.

    Poor people skills

    Problematic people skills, externally with clients or internally with colleagues, can affect an employee’s performance or the team’s engagement.

    Personal factors are a common performance inhibitor due to emergency WFH measures. The decreased divide between work and home life and the additional stresses of the pandemic can bring up new cases of poor performance or exacerbate existing ones. Remind managers that all potential root causes should still be investigated rather than assuming personal factors are the problem and emphasize that there can be more than one cause.

    Ensure managers continue to conduct frequent performance conversations

    Once an informal conversation has been initiated, the manager should schedule frequent one-on-one performance conversations (above and beyond performance management check-ins).

    1

    Identify

    2

    Initiate

    3

    Deploy

    4

    a) Follow Up
    b) Decide
    Explain to managers the purpose of these discussions is to:
    • Continue to probe for root causes.
    • Reinforce role expectations and performance targets.
    • Follow up on any improvements.
    • Address the performance issue and share relevant resources (e.g. HR or employee assistance program [EAP]).
    Given these conversations will be remote, require managers to:
    • Use video whenever possible to read physical cues and body language.
    • Bookend the conversation. Starting each meeting by setting the context for the discussion and finishing with the employee reiterating the key takeaways back will ensure there are no misunderstandings.
    • Document the conversation and share with HR. This provides evidence of the conversations and helps hold managers accountable.
    What is HR’s role? HR should ensure that the manager has had multiple conversations with the employee before moving to the next step. Furthermore, HR is responsible for ensuring manages are equipped to have the conversations through coaching, role-playing, etc.

    For more information on the content of these conversations or for material to leverage for training purposes, see Manage Poor Performance While Working From Home: Manager Guide.

    McLean & Company Insight

    Managers are there to be coaches, not therapists. Uncovering the root cause of poor performance will allow managers to pinpoint supports needed, either within their expertise (e.g. coaching, training, providing flexible hours) or by directing the employee to proper external resources such as an EAP.

    Help managers use formal performance improvement tools with remote workers

    1

    Identify

    2

    Initiate

    3

    Deploy

    4

    a) Follow Up
    b) Decide
    Deploy: Use performance improvement tools.
    If initial performance conversations were unsuccessful and performance does not improve, refer managers to performance improvement tools:
    • Suggest any other available support and resources they have not yet recommended (e.g. EAP).
    • Explore options for co-creation of a development plan to increase employee buy-in. If the manager has been diligent about clarifying role expectations, invite the employee to put together their own action plan for meeting performance goals. This can then be reviewed and finalized with the manager.
    • Have the manager use a formal PIP for development and to get the employee back on track. Review the development plan or PIP with the manager before they share it with the employee to ensure it is clear and has time bound, realistic goals for improvement.
    Using a PIP solely to avoid legal trouble and terminate employees isn’t true to its intended purpose. This is what progressive discipline is for.In the case of significant behavior problems, like breaking company rules or safety violations, the manager will likely need to move to progressive discipline. HR should advise managers on the appropriate process.

    When does the issue warrant progressive discipline? If the action needs to stop immediately, (e.g. threatening or inappropriate behavior) and/or as outlined in the collective agreement.

    Clarify remote PIP stages and best practices

    1

    Identify

    2

    Initiate

    3

    Deploy

    4

    a) Follow Up
    b) Decide
    Sample Stages:
    1. Written PIP
    • HR reviews and signs off on PIP
    • Manager holds meeting to provide employee with PIP
    • Employee reviews the PIP
    • Manager and employee provide e-signatures
    • Signed PIP is given to HR
    2. Possible Extension
    3. Final Notice
    • Manager provides employee with final notice if there has been no improvement in agreed time frame
    • Copy of signed final notice letter given to HR

    Who is involved?

    The manager runs the meeting with the employee. HR should act as a support by:

    • Ensuring the PIP is clear, aligned with the performance issue, and focused on development, prior to the meeting.
    • Pointing to resources and making themselves available prior to, during, and after the meeting.
      • When should HR be involved? HR should be present in the meeting if the manager has requested it or if the employee has approached HR beforehand with concerns about the manager. Keep in mind that if the employee sees HR has been unexpectedly invited to the video call, it could add extra stress for them.
    • Reviewing documentation and ensuring expectations and the action plan are reasonable and realistic.

    Determine the length of the PIP

    • The length of the initial PIP will often depend on the complexity of the employee’s role and how long it will reasonably take to see improvements. The minimum (before a potential extension) should be 30-60 days.
    • Ensure the action plan takes sustainment into account. Employees must be able to demonstrate improvement and sustain improved performance in order to successfully complete a PIP.

    Timing of delivery

    Help the manager determine when the PIP meeting will occur (what day, time of day). Take into account the schedule of the employee they will be meeting with (e.g. avoid scheduling right before an important client call).

    1

    Identify

    2

    Initiate

    3

    Deploy

    4

    a) Follow Up
    b) Decide

    Follow up: If the process escalated to step 3 and is successful.

    What does success look like? Performance improvement must be sustained after the PIP is completed. It’s not enough to simply meet performance improvement goals and expectations; the employee must continue to perform.

    Have the manager schedule a final PIP review with the employee. Use video, as this enables the employee and manager to read body language and minimize miscommunication/misinterpretation.

    • If performance expectations have been met, instruct managers to document this in the PIP, inform the employee they are off the PIP, and provide it to HR.

    The manager should also continue check-ins with the employee to ensure sustainment and as part of continued performance management.

    • Set a specific timeline, e.g. every two weeks or every month. Choose a cadence that works best for the manager and employee.

    OR

    Decide: Determine action steps if the process is unsuccessful.

    If at the end of step 3 performance has not sufficiently improved, the organization (HR and the manager) should either determine if the employee could/should be temporarily redeployed while the emergency WFH is still in place, if a permanent transfer to a role that is a better fit is an option, or if the employee should be let go.

    See the Complete Manual for COVID-19 Layoffs blueprint for information on layoffs in remote environments.

    Managers, HR, and employees all have a role to play in performance improvement

    Managers
    • Identify the outcomes the organization is looking for and clearly outline and communicate the expectations for the employee’s performance.
    • Diagnose root cause(s) of the performance issue.
    • Support employee through frequent conversations and feedback.
    • Coach for improved performance.
    • Visibly recognize and broadcast employee achievements.
    Employees
    • Have open and honest conversations with their manager, acknowledge their accountability, and be receptive to feedback.
    • Set performance goals to meet expectations of the role.
    • Prepare for frequent check-ins regarding improvement.
    • Seek support from HR as required.
    HR
    • Provide managers with a process, training, and support to improve employee performance.
    • Coach managers to ensure employees have been made aware of their role expectations and current performance and given specific recommendations on how to improve.
    • Reinforce the process for improving employee performance to ensure that adequate coaching conversations have taken place before the formal PIP.
    • Coach employees on how to approach their manager to discuss challenges in meeting expectations.

    HR should conduct checkpoints with both managers and employees in cases where a formal PIP was initiated to ensure the process for performance improvement is being followed and to support both parties in improving performance.

    Email templates

    Use the templates found on the next slides to draft communications to employees who are underperforming while working from home.

    Customize all templates with relevant information and use them as a guide to further tailor your communication to a specific employee.

    Customization Recommendations

    Review all slides and adjust the language or content as needed to suit the needs of the employee, the complexity of their role, and the performance issue.

    • The pencil icon to the left denotes slides requiring customization of the text. Customize text in grey font and be sure to convert all font to black when you are done.

    Included Templates

    1. Performance Discussion Follow-Up
    2. PIP Cover Letter

    This template is not a substitute for legal advice. Ensure you consult with your legal counsel, labor relations representative, and union representative to align with collective agreements and relevant legislation.

    Sample Performance Discussion Follow-Up

    Hello [name],

    Thank you for the commitment and eagerness in our meeting yesterday.

    I wanted to recap the conversation and expectations for the month of [insert month].

    As discussed, you have been advised about your recent [behavior, performance, attendance, policy, etc.] where you have demonstrated [state specific issue with detail of behavior/performance of concern]. As per our conversation, we’ll be working on improvement in this area in order to meet expectations set out for our employees.

    It is expected that employees [state expectations]. Please do not hesitate to reach out to me if there is further clarification needed or you if you have any questions or concerns. The management team and I are committed to helping you achieve these goals.

    We will do a formal check-in on your progress every [insert day] from [insert time] to review your progress. I will also be available for daily check-ins to support you on the right track. Additionally, you can book me in for desk-side coaching outside of my regular desk-side check-ins. If there is anything else I can do to help support you in hitting these goals, please let me know. Other resources we discussed that may be helpful in meeting these objectives are [summarize available support and resources]. By working together through this process, I have no doubt that you can be successful. I am here to provide support and assist you through this.

    If you’re unable to show improvements set out in our discussion by [date], we will proceed to a formal performance measure that will include a performance improvement plan. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns; I am here to help.

    Please acknowledge this email and let me know if you have any questions.

    Thank you,

    PIP Cover Letter

    Hello [name] ,

    This is to confirm our meeting on [date] in which we discussed your performance to date and areas that need improvement. Please find the attached performance improvement plan, which contains a detailed action plan that we have agreed upon to help you meet role expectations over the next [XX days]. The aim of this plan is to provide you with a detailed outline of our performance expectations and provide you the opportunity to improve your performance, with our support.

    We will check in every [XX days] to review your progress. At the end of the [XX]-day period, we will review your performance against the role expectations set out in this performance improvement plan. If you don’t meet the performance requirements in the time allotted, further action and consequences will follow.

    Should you have any questions about the performance improvement plan or the process outlined in this document, please do not hesitate to discuss them with me.

    [Employee name], it is my personal objective to help you be a fully productive member of our team. By working together through this performance improvement plan, I have no doubt that you can be successful. I am here to provide support and assist you through the process. At this time, I would also like to remind you about the [additional resources available at your organization, for example, employee assistance program or HR].

    Please acknowledge this email and let me know if you have any questions.

    Thank you,

    Prepare and customize manager guide and resources

    Sample of Manage Poor Performance While Working From Home: Manager Guide. Manage Poor Performance While Working From Home: Manager Guide

    This tool for managers provides advice on navigating the process and focuses on the content of remote performance discussions.

    Sample of Set Meaningful Employee Performance Measures. Set Meaningful Employee Performance Measures

    See this blueprint for information on setting holistic measures to inspire employee performance.

    Sample of Manage Poor Performance While Working From Home: Infographic. Manage Poor Performance While Working From Home: Infographic

    This tool illustrates the high-level steps of the performance improvement process.

    Sample of Wellness and Working From Home: Infographic. Wellness and Working From Home: Infographic

    This tool highlights tips to manage physical and mental health while working from home.

    Sample of Build a Better Manager: Team Essentials. Build a Better Manager: Team Essentials

    See this solution set for more information on kick-starting the effectiveness of first-time IT managers with essential management skills.

    Sample of Leverage Agile Goal Setting for Improved Employee Engagement & Performance. Leverage Agile Goal Setting for Improved Employee Engagement & Performance

    See this blueprint for information on dodging the micromanaging foul and scoring with agile short-term goal setting.

    Bibliography

    Arringdale, Chris. “6 Tips For Managers Trying to Overcome Performance Appraisal Anxiety.” TLNT. 18 September 2015. Accessed 2018.

    Borysenko, Karlyn. “What Was Management Thinking? The High Cost of Employee Turnover.” Talent Management and HR. 22 April 2015. Accessed 2018.

    Cook, Ian. “Curbing Employee Turnover Contagion in the Workplace.” Visier. 20 February 2018. Accessed 2018.

    Cornerstone OnDemand. Toxic Employees in the Workplace. Santa Monica, California: Cornerstone OnDemand, 2015. Web.

    Dewar, Carolyn and Reed Doucette. “6 elements to create a high-performing culture.” McKinsey & Company. 9 April 2018. Accessed 2018.

    Eagle Hill. Eagle Hill National Attrition Survey. Washington, D.C.: Eagle Hill, 2015. Web.

    ERC. “Performance Improvement Plan Checklist.” ERC. 21 June 2017. Accessed 2018.

    Foster, James. “The Impact of Managers on Workplace Engagement and Productivity.” Interact. 16 March 2017. Accessed 2018.

    Godwins Solicitors LLP. “Employment Tribunal Statistics for 2015/2016.” Godwins Solicitors LLP. 8 February 2017. Accessed 2018.

    Mankins, Michael. “How to Manage a Team of All-Stars.” Harvard Business Review. 6 June 2017. Accessed 2018.

    Maxfield, David, et al. The Value of Stress-Free Productivity. Provo, Utah: VitalSmarts, 2017. Web.

    Murphy, Mark. “Skip Your Low Performers When Starting Performance Appraisals.” Forbes. 21 January 2015. Accessed 2018.

    Quint. “Transforming into a High Performance Organization.” Quint Wellington Redwood. 16 November 2017. Accessed 2018.

    Ranosa, Rachel. "COVID -19: Canadian Productivity Booms Despite Social Distancing." Human Resources Director, 14 April 2020. Accessed 2020.

    Mitigate the Risk of Cloud Downtime and Data Loss

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}412|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: DR and Business Continuity
    • Parent Category Link: /business-continuity
    • Senior leadership is asking difficult questions about the organization’s dependency on third-party cloud services and the risk that poses.
    • IT leaders have limited control over third-party incidents and that includes cloud services. Yet they are on the hot seat when cloud services go down.
    • While vendors have swooped in to provide resilience options for the more-common SaaS solutions, it is not the case for all cloud services.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • No control over the software does not mean no recovery options. Solutions range from designing an IT workaround using alternate technologies to pre-defined third-party service continuity options (e.g. see options for O365) to business workarounds.
    • Even where there is limited control, you can at least define an incident response plan to streamline notification, assessment, and implementation of workarounds. Leadership wants more options than simply waiting for the service to come back online.
    • At a minimum, IT’s responsibility is to identify and communicate risk to senior leadership. That starts with a vendor review to identify SLA issues and overall resilience gaps.

    Impact and Result

    • Follow a structured process to assess cloud resilience risk.
    • Identify opportunities to mitigate risk – at the very least, ensure critical data is protected.
    • Summarize cloud services risk, mitigation options, and incident response for senior leadership.

    Mitigate the Risk of Cloud Downtime and Data Loss Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Mitigate the Risk of Cloud Downtime and Data Loss – Step-by-step guide to assess risk, identify risk mitigation options, and create an incident response plan.

    Even where there is limited control, you can define an incident response plan to streamline notification, assessment, and implementation of workarounds.

    • Mitigate the Risk of Cloud Downtime and Data Loss Storyboard

    2. Cloud Services Incident Risk and Mitigation Review – Review your key cloud vendors’ SLAs, incident preparedness, and data protection strategy.

    At a minimum, IT’s responsibility is to identify and communicate risk to senior leadership. That starts with a vendor review to identify SLA and overall resilience gaps.

    • Cloud Services Incident Risk and Mitigation Review Tool

    3. SaaS Incident Response Workflows – Use these examples to guide your efforts to create cloud incident response workflows.

    The examples illustrate different approaches to incident response depending on the criticality of the service and options available.

    • SaaS Incident Response Workflows (Visio)
    • SaaS Incident Response Workflows (PDF)

    4. Cloud Services Resilience Summary – Use this template to capture your results.

    Summarize cloud services risk, mitigation options, and incident response for senior leadership.

    • Cloud Services Resilience Summary
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Mitigate the Risk of Cloud Downtime and Data Loss

    Resilience and disaster recovery in an increasingly Cloudy and SaaSy world.

    Analyst Perspective

    If you think cloud means you don’t need a response plan, then get your resume ready.

    Frank Trovato

    Most organizations are now recognizing that they can’t ignore the risk of a cloud outage or data loss, and the challenge is “what can I do about it?” since there is limited control.

    If you still think “it’s in the cloud, so I don’t need to worry about it,” then get your resume ready. When O365 goes down, your executives are calling IT, not Microsoft, for an answer of what’s being done and what can they do in the meantime to get the business up and running again.

    The key is to recognize what you can control and what actions you can take to evaluate and mitigate risk. At a minimum, you can ensure senior leadership is aware of the risk and define a plan for how you will respond to an incident, even if that is limited to monitoring and communicating status.

    Often you can do more, including defining IT workarounds, backing up your SaaS data for additional protection, and using business process workarounds to bridge the gap, as illustrated in the case studies in this blueprint.

    Frank Trovato
    Research Director, Infrastructure & Operations

    Info-Tech Research Group

    Use this blueprint to expand your DRP and BCP to account for cloud services

    As more applications are migrated to cloud-based services, disaster recovery (DR) and business continuity plans (BCP) must include an understanding of cloud risks and actions to mitigate those risks. This includes evaluating vendor and service reliability and resilience, security measures, data protection capabilities, and technology and business workarounds if there is a cloud outage or incident.

    Use the risk assessments and cloud service incident response plans developed through this blueprint to supplement your DRP and BCP as well as further inform your crisis management plans (e.g. account for cloud risks in your crisis communication planning).

    Overall Business Continuity Plan

    IT Disaster Recovery Plan

    A plan to restore IT application and infrastructure services following a disruption.

    Info-Tech’s Disaster Recovery Planning blueprint provides a methodology for creating the IT DRP. Leverage this blueprint to validate and provide inputs for your IT DRP.

    BCP for Each Business Unit

    A set of plans to resume business processes for each business unit.

    Info-Tech’s Develop a Business Continuity Plan blueprint provides a methodology for creating business unit BCPs as part of an overall BCP for the organization.

    Crisis Management Plan

    A plan to manage a wide range of crises, from health and safety incidents to business disruptions to reputational damage.

    Info-Tech’s Implement Crisis Management Best Practices blueprint provides a framework for planning a response to any crisis, from health and safety incidents to reputational damage.

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    Common Obstacles

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    • Senior leadership is asking difficult questions about the organization’s dependency on third-party cloud services and the risk that poses.
    • Migrating to cloud services transfers much of the responsibility for day-to-day platform maintenance but not accountability for resilience.
    • IT leaders are often responsible for not just the organization’s IT DRP but also BCP and other elements of overall resilience. Cloud risk adds another element IT leaders need to consider.
    • IT leaders have limited control over third-party incidents and that includes cloud services. With SaaS services in particular, recovery or continuity options may be limited.
    • While vendors have swooped in to provide resilience options for the more common SaaS solutions, that is not the case for all cloud services.
    • Part of the solution is defining business process workarounds and that depends on cooperation from business leaders.
    • At a minimum, IT’s responsibility is to identify and communicate risk to senior leadership. That starts with a vendor review to identify SLA and overall resilience gaps.
    • Adapt how you approach downtime and data loss risk, particularly for SaaS solutions where there is limited or no control over the system.
    • Even where there is limited control, you can define an incident response plan to streamline notification, assessment, and implementation of workarounds. Leadership wants more options than simply waiting for the service to come back online.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Asking vendors about their DRP, BCP, and overall resilience has become commonplace. Expect your vendors to provide answers so you can assess risk. Furthermore, your vendor may have additional offerings to increase resilience or recommendations for third parties who can further assist your goals of improving cloud service resilience.

    Key deliverable

    Cloud Services Resilience Summary

    Provide leadership with a summary of cloud risk, downtime workarounds implemented, and additional data protection.

    The image contains a screenshot of the Cloud Services Resilience Summary.

    Additional tools and templates in this blueprint

    Cloud Services Incident Risk and Mitigation Review Tool

    Use this tool to gather vendor input, evaluate vendor SLAs and overall resilience, and track your own risk mitigation efforts.

    The image contains a screenshot of the Cloud Services Incident Risk and Mitigation Review Tool.

    SaaS Incident Response Workflows

    Use the examples in this document as a model to develop your own incident response workflows for cloud outages or data loss.

    The image contains a screenshot of the SaaS Incident Response Workflows.

    This blueprint will step you through the following actions to evaluate and mitigate cloud services risk

    1. Assess your cloud risk
    • Review your cloud services to determine potential impact of downtime/data loss, vendor SLA gaps, and vendor’s current resilience.
  • Identify options to mitigate risk
    • Explore your cloud vendor’s resilience offerings, third-party solutions, DIY recovery options, and business workarounds.
  • Create an incident response plan
    • Document your cloud risk mitigation strategy and incident response plan, which might include a failover strategy, data protection, and/or business continuity.

    Cloud Risk Mitigation

    Identify options to mitigate risk

    Create an incident response plan

    Assess risk

    Phase 1: Assess your cloud risk

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    Phase 3

    Assess your cloud risk

    Identify options to mitigate risk

    Create an incident response plan

    Cloud does not guarantee uptime

    Public cloud services (e.g. Azure, GCP, AWS) and popular SaaS solutions experience downtime every year.

    A few cloud outage examples:

    • Microsoft Azure AD outage, March 15, 2022:
      Many users could not log into O365, Dynamics, or the Azure Portal.
      Cause: software change.
    • Three AWS outages in December 2021: December 7 (Netflix and others impacted), December 15 (Duo, Zoom, Slack, others), December 20 (Slack, Epic Games, others). Cause: network issues, power outage.
    • Salesforce outage, May 12, 2022: Users could not access the Lightning platform. Cause: expired certificate.

    Cloud availability

    • Migrating to cloud services can improve availability, as they typically offer more resilience than most organizations can afford to implement themselves.
    • However, having multiple data centers, zones, and regions doesn’t prevent all outages, as we see every year with even the largest cloud vendors.

    DR challenges for IaaS, PaaS, and cloud-native

    While there are limits to what you control, often traditional “failover” DR strategy can apply.

    High-level challenges and resilience options:

    • IaaS: No control over the hardware, but you can failover to another region. This is fairly similar to traditional DR.
    • PaaS: No control over the software platform (e.g. SQL server as a service), but you can back up your data and explore vendor options to replicate your environment.
    • Cloud-native applications: As with PaaS, you can back up your data and explore vendor options to replicate your environment.

    Plan for resilience

    • Include DR requirements when designing cloud service implementation. For example, for IaaS solutions, identify what data would need to be replicated and what services may need to be “always on” (e.g. database services where high-availability is demanded).
    • Similarly, for PaaS and cloud-native solutions, consult your vendor regarding options to build in resilience options (e.g. ability to failover to another environment).

    DR challenges for SaaS solutions

    SaaS is the biggest challenge because you have no control over any part of the base application stack.

    High-level challenges and resilience options:

    • No control over the hardware (or the facility, maintenance processes, and so on).
    • No control over the base application (control is limited to configuration settings and add-on customizations or integrations).
    • Options to back up your data will depend on the service.

    Note: The rest of this blueprint is focused primarily on SaaS resilience due to the challenges listed here. For other cloud services, leverage traditional DR strategies and vendor management to mitigate risk (as summarized on the previous slides).

    Focus on what you can control

    • For SaaS solutions in particular, you must toss out traditional DR. If Salesforce has an outage, you won’t be involved in recovering the system.
    • Instead, DR for SaaS needs to focus on improving resilience where you do have control and implementing business workarounds to bridge the gap.

    Evaluate your cloud services to clarify your specific risks

    Time and money is limited, so focus first on cloud services that are most critical and evaluate the vendors’ SLA and existing resilience capabilities.

    The activities on the next two slides will evaluate risk through two approaches:

    Activity 1: Estimate potential impact of downtime and data loss to quantify the risk and determine which cloud services are most critical and need to be prioritized. This is done through a business impact analysis that assesses:

    • Impact on revenue or costs (if applicable).
    • Impact on reputation (e.g. customer impact).
    • Impact on regulatory compliance and health and safety (if applicable).

    Activity 2: Review the vendor to identify risks and gaps. Specifically, evaluate the following:

    • Incident Management SLAs (e.g. does the SLA include RTO/RPO commitments? Do they meet your requirements?)
    • Incident Response Preparedness (e.g. does the vendor have a DRP, BCP, and security incident response plan?)
    • Data Protection (e.g. does their backup strategy and data security meet your standards?)

    Activity 1: Quantify potential impact and prioritize cloud services using a business impact analysis (BIA)

    1-3 hours

    1. Download the latest version of our DRP BIA: DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool. The tool includes instructions.
    2. Include the cloud services you want to assess in the list of applications/systems (see the tool excerpt below), and follow the BIA methodology outlined in the Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan blueprint.
    3. Use the results to quantify potential impact and prioritize your efforts on the most-critical cloud services.

    The image contains a screenshot of the DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool.

    Materials
    • DRP BIA Tool
    Participants
    • Core group of IT management and staff who can provide a well-rounded perspective on potential impact. They will create the first draft of the BIA.
    • Review the draft BIA with relevant business leaders to refine and validate the results.

    Activity 2: Review your key cloud vendors’ SLAs, incident preparedness, and data protection strategy

    1-3 hours

    Use the Cloud Services Incident Risk and Mitigation Review Tool as follows:

    1. Send the Vendor Questionnaire tab to your cloud vendors to gather input, and review your existing agreements.
    2. Copy the vendor responses into the tool (see the instructions in the tool) and evaluate. See the example excerpt below.
    3. Identify action items to clarify gaps or address risks. Some action items might not be defined yet and will need to wait until you have had a chance to further explore risk mitigation options.

    The image contains a screenshot of the Cloud Services Incident Risk and Mitigation Review Tool.

    Materials
    • Cloud Services Incident Risk and Mitigation Review Tool
    Participants
    • Core group of IT management and staff tasked with evaluating and improving cloud services’ resilience.

    Phase 2: Identify options to mitigate risk

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    Phase 3

    Assess your cloud risk

    Identify options to mitigate risk

    Create an incident response plan

    Consult your vendor to identify options to improve resilience, as a starting point

    Your vendor might also be able to suggest third parties that offer additional support, backup, or service continuity options.

    • The Vendor Questionnaire tab in the Cloud Services Incident Risk and Mitigation Review Tool includes a section at the bottom where your vendor can name additional options to improve resilience (e.g. premium support packages, potentially their own DR services).
    • If your vendor has not completed that part of the questionnaire, meet with them to discuss this. Asking service vendors about resilience has become commonplace, so they should be prepared to answer questions about their own offerings and potentially can name trusted third-party vendors who can further assist you.
    • Leverage Info-Tech’s advisory services to evaluate options outlined by your vendor and potential third-party options (e.g. enterprise backup solutions that support backing up SaaS data).

    Some SaaS solutions have plenty of resilience options; others not so much

    • The pervasiveness of O365 has led vendors to close the service continuity gap, with options to send and receive email during an outage and back up your data.
    • With many SaaS solutions, there isn’t going to be a third-party service continuity option, but you might still be able to at least back up your data and implement business process workarounds to close the service gap.

    Example SaaS risk and mitigation: O365

    Risk

    • Several outages every year (e.g. MS Teams July 20, 2022).
    • SLA exceptions include “Scheduled Downtime,” which can occur with just five days’ notice.
    • The Recycling Bin is your data backup, depending on your setup.

    Options to mitigate risk (not an exhaustive list):

    • Third-party solutions for email service continuity.
    • Several backup vendors (e.g. Veeam, Rubrik) can protect most of your O365 suite.
    • Business continuity workarounds leveraging synced OneDrive, SharePoint, and Outlook (access to calendar invites).

    Example SaaS risk and mitigation: Salesforce

    Risk

    • Downtime has been infrequent, but Salesforce did have a major outage in May 2021 (DNS issue) and May 2022 (expired certificate).
    • At the time of this writing, the Main Services Agreement does not commit to a specific uptime value and specifies the usual exclusions.
    • Similarly, there are limited commitments regarding data protection.

    Options to mitigate risk (not an exhaustive list):

    • Salesforce provides a backup and restore service offering.
    • In addition, some third-party vendors support backing up Salesforce data for additional protection against data corruption or data loss.
    • Business continuity workarounds can further reduce the impact of downtime (e.g. record updates in MS Word and leverage Outlook for contact info until Salesforce is recovered).

    Establish a baseline standard for risk mitigation, regardless of cloud service

    At a minimum, set a goal to review vendor risk at least annually, define standard processes for monitoring outages, and review options to back up your SaaS data.

    Example baseline standard for cloud risk mitigation

    • Review vendor risk at least annually. This includes reviewing SLAs, vendor’s incident preparedness (e.g. do they have a current DRP, BCP, and Security IRP?), and the vendor’s data protection strategy.
    • Incident response plans must include, at a minimum, steps to monitor vendor outage and communicate status to relevant stakeholders. Where possible, business process workarounds are defined to bridge the service gap.
    • For critical data (based on your BIA and an evaluation of risk), maintain your own backups of SaaS data for additional protection.

    Embed risk mitigation standards into existing IT operations

    • Include specific SLA requirements, including incident management processes, in your RFP process and annual vendor review.
    • Define cloud incident response in your incident management procedures.
    • Include cloud data considerations in your backup strategy reviews.

    Phase 3: Create an incident response plan

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    Phase 3

    Assess your cloud risk

    Identify options to mitigate risk

    Create an incident response plan

    Activity 1: Review the example incident response workflows and case studies as a starting point

    1-3 hours

    1. Review the SaaS Incident Response Workflows examples. The examples illustrate different approaches to incident response depending on the criticality of the service and options available.
    2. Review the case studies on the next few slides, which further illustrate the resilience and incident response solutions implemented.
    3. Note the key elements:
    • Detection
    • Assessment
    • Monitoring status / contacting the vendor
    • Communication with key stakeholders
    • Invoking workarounds, if applicable

    Example SaaS Incident Response Workflow Excerpt

    The image contains a screenshot of an example of the SaaS Incident Response Workflow Excerpt.
    Materials
    • SaaS Incident Response Workflows examples
    Participants
    • Core group of IT management and staff tasked with evaluating and improving cloud services’ resilience.
    • Relevant business process owners to provide input and define business workarounds, where applicable.

    Case Study 1: Recovery plan for critical fundraising event

    If either critical SaaS dependency fails, the following plan is executed:

    1. Donors are redirected to a predefined alternate donation page hosted by a different service. The alternate page connects to the backup payment processing service (with predefined integrations).
    2. Marketing communications support the redirect.
    3. While the backup solution doesn’t gather as much data, the payment details provide enough information to follow up with donors where necessary.

    Criticality justified a failover option

    The Annual Day of Giving generates over 50% of fundraising for the year. It’s critically dependent on two SaaS solutions that host the donation page and payment processing.

    To mitigate the risk, the organization implemented the ability to failover to an alternate “environment” – much like a traditional DR solution – supported by workarounds to manage data collection.

    Case Study 2: Protecting customer data

    Daily exports from a SaaS-hosted donations site reduce potential data loss:

    1. Daily exports to a CRM support donor profile updates and follow-ups (tax receipts, thank-you letters, etc.).
    2. The exports also mitigate the risk of data loss due to an incident with the SaaS-hosted donation site.
    3. This company is exploring more-frequent exports to further reduce the risk of data loss.

    Protecting your data gives you options

    For critical data, do you want to rely solely on the vendor’s default backup strategy?

    If your SaaS vendor is hit by ransomware or if their backup frequency doesn’t meet your needs, having your own data backup gives you options.

    It can also support business process workarounds that need to access that data while waiting for SaaS recovery.

    Case Study 3: Recovery plan for payroll

    To enable a more accurate payroll workaround, the following is done:

    1. After each payroll run, export the payroll data from the SaaS solution to a secure location.
    2. If there is a SaaS outage when payroll must be submitted, the exported data can be modified and converted to an ACH file.
    3. The ACH file is submitted to the bank, which has preapproved this workaround.

    BCP can bridge the gap

    When leadership looks to IT to mitigate cloud risk, include BCP in the discussion.

    Payroll is a good example where the best recovery option might be a business continuity workaround.

    IT often still has a role in business continuity workarounds, as in this case study: specifically, providing a solution to modify and convert the payroll data to an ACH file.

    Activity 2: Run tabletop planning exercises as a starting point to build your incident response plan

    1-3 hours

    1. Follow the tabletop planning instructions provided in the Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan blueprint.
    2. Run the exercise for each cloud service. Keep the scenario generic at first (e.g. cloud service is down with no reported root cause) so you can focus on your response. Capture response steps and gaps.
    3. Add complexity in subsequent exercises (e.g. data loss plus downtime), and use that to expand and refine the workflow as needed.
    4. Use the resulting workflows as the core piece of your incident response plan.
    5. Supplement the workflow with relevant checklists or procedures. At this point you can choose to incorporate this into your DRP or BCP or maintain these documents as supplements to those plans.
      See the DRP Case Study and BCP Case Study for an example of DRP-BCP documentation.

    Example tabletop planning results excerpt with gaps identified

    The image contains an example tabletop planning results excerpt with gaps identified.

    Materials
    • SaaS Incident Response Workflows examples
    Participants
    • Core group of IT management and staff tasked with evaluating and improving cloud services’ resilience.
    • Review results with relevant business process owners to provide input and define business workarounds where applicable.

    Activity 3: Summarize cloud services resilience to inform senior leadership of current risks and mitigation efforts

    1-3 hours

    1. Use the Cloud Services Resilience Summary example as a template to capture the following:
    • The results of your vendor review (i.e. incident management SLAs, incident response preparedness, data protections strategy).
    • The current state of your downtime workarounds and additional data loss protection.
    • Your baseline standard for cloud services risk mitigation.
    • Summary of resilience, risks, workarounds, and data loss protection for each individual cloud service that you have reviewed.
  • Present the results to senior leadership to:
    • Highlight risks to inform business decisions to mitigate or accept those risks.
    • Summarize actions already taken to mitigate risks.
    • Communicate next steps (e.g. action items to address remaining risks).

    Cloud Services Resilience Summary – Table of Contents

    The image contains a screenshot of Cloud Services Resilience Summary – Table of Contents.
    Materials
    • Cloud Services Resilience Summary
    Participants
    • Core group of IT management and staff tasked with evaluating and improving cloud services’ resilience.
    • Review results with relevant business process owners to provide input and define business workarounds where applicable.

    Summary: For cloud services, after evaluating risk, IT must adapt how they approach risk mitigation

    1. Identify failover options where possible
    • A failover strategy is possible for many cloud services (e.g. IaaS replication to another region, or failing over SaaS to an alternate solution as in case study 1).
  • At least protect your data
    • Explore supplementary backup options to protect against ransomware, data corruption, or data loss and support business continuity workarounds (see case study 2).
  • Leverage BCP to close the gap
    • This doesn’t absolve IT of its role in mitigating cloud incident risk, but business process workarounds can bridge the gap where IT options are limited (see case study 3).

    Related Info-Tech Research

    IT DRP Maturity Assessment

    Get an objective assessment of your DRP program and recommendations for improvement.

    Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan

    Close the gap between your DR capabilities and service continuity requirements.

    Develop a Business Continuity Plan

    Streamline the traditional approach to make BCP development manageable and repeatable.

    Implement Crisis Management Best Practices

    Don’t be another example of what not to do. Implement an effective crisis response plan to minimize the impact on business continuity, reputation, and profitability.

    Pandemic Preparation – The People Playbook

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}513|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Lead
    • Parent Category Link: /lead
    • Keeping employees safe – limiting exposure of employees to the virus and supporting them in the event they become ill.
    • Reducing potential disruption to business operations through employee absenteeism and travel restrictions.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Communication of facts and definitive action plans from credible leaders is the key to maintaining some stability during a time of uncertainty.
    • Remote work is no longer a remote possibility – implementing alternative temporary work arrangements that keep large groups of employees from congregating reduce risk of employee exposure and operational downtime.
    • Pandemic travel protocols are necessary to support staff and their continuation of work while traveling for business and/or if stuck in a high-risk, restricted area.

    Impact and Result

    • Assign accountability of key planning decisions to members of a pandemic response team.
    • Craft key messages in preparation for communicating to employees.
    • Cascade communications from credible sources in a way that will establish pandemic travel protocols.

    Pandemic Preparation – The People Playbook Research & Tools

    Start here. Read the Pandemic Preparation: The People Playbook

    Read our concise Playbook to find out how you can immediately prepare for the people side of pandemic planning.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    • Pandemic Preparation: The People Playbook
    [infographic]

    Select a Security Outsourcing Partner

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}246|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 8.8/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $13,739 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 8 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Security Processes & Operations
    • Parent Category Link: /security-processes-and-operations
    • Most organizations do not have a clear understanding of their current security posture, their security goals, and the specific security services they require. Without a clear understanding of their needs, organizations may struggle to identify a partner that can meet their requirements.
    • Breakdowns and lack of communication can be a significant obstacle, especially when clear lines of communication with partners, including regular check-ins, reporting, and incident response protocols, have not been clearly established.
    • Ensuring that security partners’ systems and processes integrate seamlessly with existing systems can be a challenge for most organizations in addition to making sure that security partners have the necessary access and permissions to perform their services effectively.
    • Adhering to security policies is rarely a priority to users as compliance often feels like an interference to daily workflow. For a lot of organizations, security policies are not having the desired effect.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • You can outsource your responsibilities but not your accountability.
    • Be aware that in most cases, the traditional approach is more profitable to MSSPs, and they may push you toward one, so make sure you get the service you want, not what they prescribe.

    Impact and Result

    • Determine which security responsibilities can be outsourced and which should be insourced and the right procedure to outsourcing to gain cost savings, improve resource allocation, and boost your overall security posture.

    Select a Security Outsourcing Partner Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Select a Security Outsourcing Partner Storyboard – A guide to help you determine your requirements and select and manage your security outsourcing partner.

    Our systematic approach will ensure that the correct procedure for selecting a security outsourcing partner is implemented. This blueprint will help you build and implement your security policy program by following our three-phase methodology: determine what to outsource, select the right MSSP, and manage your MSSP.

    • Select a Security Outsourcing Partner – Phases 1-3

    2. MSSP RFP Template – A customizable template to help you choose the right security service provider.

    This modifiable template is designed to introduce consistency and outline key requirements during the request for proposal phase of selecting an MSSP.

    • MSSP RFP Template

    Infographic

    Further reading

    Select a Security Outsourcing Partner

    Outsource the right functions to secure your business.

    Analyst Perspective

    Understanding your security needs and remaining accountable is the key to selecting the right partner.

    The need for specialized security services is fast becoming a necessity to most organizations. However, resource challenges will always mean that organizations will still have to take practical measures to ensure that the time, quality, and service that they require from outsourcing partners have been carefully crafted and packaged to elicit the right services that cover all their needs and requirements.

    Organizations must ensure that security partners are aligned not only with their needs and requirements, but also with the corporate culture. Rather than introducing hindrances to daily operations, security partners must support business goals and protect the organization’s interests at all times.

    And as always, outsource only your responsibilities and do not outsource your accountability, as that will cost you in the long run.

    Photo of Danny Hammond
    Danny Hammond
    Research Analyst
    Security, Risk, Privacy & Compliance Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    A lack of high-skill labor increases the cost of internal security, making outsourcing more appealing.

    A lack of time and resources prevents your organization from being able to enable security internally.

    Due to a lack of key information on the subject, you are unsure which functions should be outsourced versus which functions should remain in-house.

    Having 24/7/365 monitoring in-house is not feasible for most firms.

    There is difficulty measuring the effectiveness of managed security service providers (MSSPs).

    Common Obstacles

    InfoSec leaders will struggle to select the right outsourcing partner without knowing what the organization needs, such as:

    • How to start the process to select the right service provider that will cover your security needs. With so many service providers and technology tools in this field, who is the right partner?
    • Where to obtain guidance on externalization of resources or maintaining internal posture to enable to you confidently select an outsourcing partner.

    InfoSec leaders must understand the business environment and their own internal security needs before they can select an outsourcing partner that fits.

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    Info-Tech’s Select a Security Outsourcing Partner takes a multi-faceted approach to the problem that incorporates foundational technical elements, compliance considerations, and supporting processes:

    • Determine which security responsibilities can be insourced and which should be outsourced, and the right procedure to outsourcing in order to gain cost savings, improve resource allocation, and boost your overall security posture.
    • Understand the current landscape of MSSPs that are available today and the features they offer.
    • Highlight the future financial obligations of outsourcing vs. insourcing to explain which method is the most cost-effective.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Mitigate security risks by developing an end-to-end process that ensures you are outsourcing your responsibilities and not your accountability.

    Your Challenge

    This research is designed to help organizations select an effective security outsourcing partner.

    • A security outsourcing partner is a third-party service provider that offers security services on a contractual basis depending on client needs and requirements.
    • An effective outsourcing partner can help an organization improve its security posture by providing access to more specialized security experts, tools, and technologies.
    • One of the main challenges with selecting a security outsourcing partner is finding a partner that is a good fit for the organization's unique security needs and requirements.
    • Security outsourcing partners typically have access to sensitive information and systems, so proper controls and safeguards must be in place to protect all sensitive assets.
    • Without careful evaluation and due diligence to ensure that the partner is a good fit for the organization's security needs and requirements, it can be challenging to select an outsourcing partner.

    Outsourcing is effective, but only if done right

    • 83% of decision makers with in-house cybersecurity teams are considering outsourcing to an MSP (Syntax, 2021).
    • 77% of IT leaders said cyberattacks were more frequent (Syntax, 2021).
    • 51% of businesses suffered a data breach caused by a third party (Ponemon, 2021).

    Common Obstacles

    The problem with selecting an outsourcing partner isn’t a lack of qualified partners, it’s the lack of clarity about an organization's specific security needs.

    • Most organizations do not have a clear understanding of their current security posture, their security goals, and the specific security services they require. Without a clear understanding of their needs, organizations may struggle to identify a partner that can meet their requirements.
    • Breakdowns and lack of communication can be a significant obstacle, especially when clear lines of communication with partners, including regular check-ins, reporting, and incident response protocols, have not been clearly established.
    • Ensuring that security partner's systems and processes integrate seamlessly with existing systems can be a challenge for most organizations. This is in addition to making sure that security partners have the necessary access and permissions to perform their services effectively.
    • Adhering to security policies is rarely a priority to users, as compliance often feels like an interference to daily workflow. For a lot of organizations, security policies are not having the desired effect.

    A diagram that shows Average cost of a data breach from 2019 to 2022.
    Source: IBM, 2022 Cost of a Data Breach; N=537.


    Reaching an all-time high, the cost of a data breach averaged US$4.35 million in 2022. This figure represents a 2.6% increase from 2021, when the average cost of a breach was US$4.24 million. The average cost has climbed 12.7% since 2020.

    Info-Tech’s methodology for selecting a security outsourcing partner

    Determine your responsibilities

    Determine what responsibilities you can outsource to a service partner. Analyze which responsibilities you should outsource versus keep in-house? Do you require a service partner based on identified responsibilities?

    Scope your requirements

    Refine the list of role-based requirements, variables, and features you will require. Use a well-known list of critical security controls as a framework to determine these activities and send out RFPs to pick the best candidate for your organization.

    Manage your outsourcing program

    Adopt a program to manage your third-party service security outsourcing. Trust your managed security service providers (MSSP) but verify their results to ensure you get the service level you were promised.

    Select a Security Outsourcing Partner

    A diagram that shows your organization responsibilities & accountabilities, framework for selecting a security outsourcing partner, and benefits.

    Blueprint benefits

    IT/InfoSec Benefits

    Reduces complexity within the MSSP selection process by highlighting all the key steps to a successful selection program.

    Introduces a roadmap to clearly educate about the do’s and don’ts of MSSP selection.

    Reduces costs and efforts related to managing MSSPs and other security partners.

    Business Benefits

    Assists with selecting outsourcing partners that are essential to your organization’s objectives.

    Integrates outsourcing into corporate culture, leveraging organizational requirements while maximizing value of outsourcing.

    Reduces security outsourcing risk.

    Insight summary

    Overarching insight: You can outsource your responsibilities but not your accountability.

    Determine what to outsource: Assess your responsibilities to determine which ones you can outsource. It is vital that an understanding of how outsourcing will affect the organization, and what cost savings, if any, to expect from outsourcing is clear in order to generate a list of responsibilities that can/should be outsourced.

    Select the right partner: Create a list of variables to evaluate the MSSPs and determine which features are important to you. Evaluate all potential MSSPs and determine which one is right for your organization

    Manage your MSSP: Align the MSSP to your organization. Adopt a program to monitor the MSSP which includes a long-term strategy to manage the MSSP.

    Identifying security needs and requirements = Effective outsourcing program: Understanding your own security needs and requirements is key. Ensure your RFP covers the entire scope of your requirements; work with your identified partner on updates and adaptation, where necessary; and always monitor alignment to business objectives.

    Measure the value of this blueprint

    Phase

    Purpose

    Measured Value

    Determine what to outsource Understand the value in outsourcing and determining what responsibilities can be outsourced. Cost of determining what you can/should outsource:
    • 120 FTE hours at $90K per year = $5,400
    Cost of determining the savings from outsourcing vs. insourcing:
    • 120 FTE hours at $90K per year = $5,400
    Select the right partner Select an outsourcing partner that will have the right skill set and solution to identified requirements. Cost of ranking and selecting your MSSPs:
    • 160 FTE hours at $90K per year = $7,200
    Cost of creating and distributing RFPs:
    • 200 FTE hours at $90K per year = $9,000
    Manage your third-party service security outsourcing Use Info-Tech’s methodology and best practices to manage the MSSP to get the best value. Cost of creating and implementing a metrics program to manage the MSSP:
    • 80 FTE hours at $90K per year = $3,600

    After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve.

    Overall Impact: 8.9 /10

    Overall Average Cost Saved: $22,950

    Overall Average Days Saved: 9

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit
    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful."

    Guided Implementation
    "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track."

    Workshop
    "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place."

    Consulting
    "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks are used throughout all four options.

    Project Management

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}48|cart{/j2store}
    • Related Products: {j2store}48|crosssells{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.7/10
    • member rating average dollars saved: $303,499
    • member rating average days saved: 42
    • Parent Category Name: Project Portfolio Management and Projects
    • Parent Category Link: /ppm-and-projects

    The challenge

    • Ill-defined or even lack of upfront project planning will increase the perception that your IT department cannot deliver value because most projects will go over time and budget.
    • The perception is those traditional ways of delivering projects via the PMBOK only increase overhead and do not have value. This is less due to the methodology and more to do with organizations trying to implement best-practices that far exceed their current capabilities.
    • Typical best-practices are too clinical in their approach and place unrealistic burdens on IT departments. They fail to address the daily difficulties faces by staff and are not sized to fit your organization.
    • Take a flexible approach and ensure that your management process is a cultural and capacity fit for your organization. Take what fits from these frameworks and embed them tailored into your company.

    Our advice

    Insight

    • The feather-touch is often the right touch. Ensure that you have a lightweight approach for most of your projects while applying more rigor to the more complex and high-risk developments.
    • Pick the right tools. Your new project management processes need the right tooling to be successful. Pick a tool that is flexible enough o accommodate projects of all sizes without imposing undue governance onto smaller projects.
    • Yes, take what fits within your company from frameworks, but there is no cherry-picking. Ensure your processes stay in context: If you do not inform for effective decision-making, all will be in vain. Develop your methods such that guide the way to big-picture decision taking and support effective portfolio management.

    Impact and results 

    • The right amount of upfront planning is a function of the type of projects you have and your company. The proper levels enable better scope statements, better requirements gathering, and increased business satisfaction.
    • An investment in a formal methodology is critical to projects of all sizes. An effective process results in more successful projects with excellent business value delivery.
    • When you have a repeatable and consistent approach to project planning and execution, you can better communicate between the IT project managers and decision-makers.
    • Better communication improves the visibility of the overall project activity within your company.

    The roadmap

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    Get started.

    Read our executive brief to understand why you should tailor project management practices to the type of projects you do and your company and review our methodology. We show you how we can support you.

    Lay the groundwork for project management success

    Assess your current capabilities to set the right level of governance.

    • Tailor Project Management Processes to Fit Your Projects – Phase 1: Lay the Groundwork for PM Success (ppt)
    • Project Management Triage Tool (xls)
    • COBIT BAI01 (Manage Programs and Projects) Alignment Workbook (xls)
    • Project Level Definition Matrix (xls)
    • Project Level Selection Tool (xls)
    • Project Level Assessment Tool (xls)
    • Project Management SOP Template (doc)

    Small project require a lightweight framework

    Increase small project's throughput.

    • Tailor Project Management Processes to Fit Your Projects – Phase 2: Build a Lightweight PM Process for Small Initiatives (ppt)
    • Level 1 Project Charter Template (doc)
    • Level 1 Project Status Report Template (doc)
    • Level 1 Project Closure Checklist Template (doc)

    Build the standard process medium and large-scale projects

    The standard process contains fully featured initiation and planning.

    • Tailor Project Management Processes to Fit Your Projects – Phase 3: Establish Initiation and Planning Protocols for Medium-to-Large Projects (ppt)
    • Project Stakeholder and Impact Assessment Tool (xls)
    • Level 2 Project Charter Template (doc)
    • Level 3 Project Charter Template (doc)
    • Kick-Off Meeting Agenda Template (doc)
    • Scope Statement Template (doc)
    • Project Staffing Plan(xls)
    • Communications Management Plan Template (doc)
    • Customer/Sponsor Project Status Meeting Template (doc)
    • Level 2 Project Status Report Template (doc)
    • Level 3 Project Status Report Template (doc)
    • Quality Management Workbook (xls)
    • Benefits Management Plan Template (xls)
    • Risk Management Workbook (xls)

    Build a standard process for the execution and closure of medium to large scale projects

    • Tailor Project Management Processes to Fit Your Projects – Phase 4: Develop Execution and Closing Procedures for Medium-to-Large Projects (ppt)
    • Project Team Meeting Agenda Template (doc)
    • Light Project Change Request Form Template (doc)
    • Detailed Project Change Request Form Template (doc)
    • Light Recommendation and Decision Tracking Log Template (xls)
    • Detailed Recommendation and Decision Tracking Log Template (xls)
    • Deliverable Acceptance Form Template (doc)
    • Handover to Operations Template (doc)
    • Post-Mortem Review Template (doc)
    • Final Sign-Off and Acceptance Form Template (doc)

    Implement your project management standard operating procedures (SOP)

    Develop roll-out and training plans, implement your new process and track metrics.

    • Tailor Project Management Processes to Fit Your Projects – Phase 5: Implement Your PM SOP (ppt)
    • Level 2 Project Management Plan Template (doc)
    • Project Management Process Costing Tool (xls)
    • Project Management Process Training Plan Template (doc)
    • Project Management Training Monitoring Tool (xls)
    • Project Management Process Implementation Timeline Tool (MS Project)
    • Project Management Process Implementation Timeline Tool (xls)

     

     

    Enable Product Delivery – Executive Leadership Workshop

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}353|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Development
    • Parent Category Link: /development
    • You need to clearly convey the direction and strategy of your product portfolio to gain alignment, support, and funding from your organization.
    • IT organizations are traditionally organized to deliver initiatives in specific periods of time. This conflicts with product delivery, which continuously delivers value over the lifetime of a product.
    • Delivering multiple products together creates additional challenges because each product has its own pedigree, history, and goals.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Empowered product managers and product owners are the key to ensuring your delivery teams are delivering the right value at the right time to the right stakeholders.
    • Establishing operationally aligned product families helps bridge the gap between enterprise priorities and product enhancements.
    • Leadership must be aligned to empower and support Agile values and product teams to unlock the full value realization within your organization.

    Impact and Result

    • Common understanding of product management and Agile delivery.
    • Commitment to support and empower product teams.

    Enable Product Delivery – Executive Leadership Workshop Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Enabling Product Delivery – Executive workshop to align senior leadership with their transition to product management and delivery.

    • Enabling Product Delivery – Executive Workshop Storyboard

    2. Enabling Product Delivery –Executive Workshop Outcomes.

    • Enabling Product Delivery – Executive Workshop Outcomes
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Enable Product Delivery – Executive Leadership Workshop

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Understanding Your Top Challenges

    The Purpose

    Understand the drivers for your product transformation.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Define the drivers for your transition to product-centric delivery.

    Activities

    1.1 What is driving your organization to become product focused?

    Outputs

    List of challenges and drivers

    2 Transitioning From Projects to Product-Centric Delivery

    The Purpose

    Understand the product transformation journey and differences.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Identify the cultural, behavioral, and leadership changes needed for a successful transformation.

    Activities

    2.1 Define the differences between projects and product delivery

    Outputs

    List of differences

    3 Enterprise Agility and the Value of Change

    The Purpose

    Understand why smaller iterations increase value realization and decrease accumulated risk.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Leverage smaller iterations to reduce time to value and accumulated risk to core operations.

    Activities

    3.1 What is business agility?

    Outputs

    Common understanding about the value of smaller iterations

    4 Defining Products and Product Management in Your Context

    The Purpose

    Establish an organizational starting definition of products.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Tailor product management to meet the needs and vision of your organization.

    Activities

    4.1 What is a product? Who are your consumers?

    4.2 Identify enablers and blockers of product ownership

    4.3 Define a set of guiding principles for product management

    Outputs

    Product definition

    List of enablers and blockers of product ownership

    Set of guiding principles for product management

    5 Connecting Product Management to Agile Practices

    The Purpose

    Understand the relationship between product management and product delivery.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Optimize product management to prioritize the right changes for the right people at the right time.

    Activities

    5.1 Discussions

    Outputs

    Common understanding

    6 Commit to Empowering Agile Product Teams

    The Purpose

    Personalize and commit to supporting product teams.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Embrace leadership and cultural changes needed to empower and support teams.

    Activities

    6.1 Your management culture

    6.2 Personal Cultural Stop, Start, and Continue

    6.3 Now, Next, Later to support product owners

    Outputs

    Your management culture map

    Personal Cultural Stop, Start, and Continue list

    Now, Next, Later roadmap

    Further reading

    Enable Product Delivery – Executive Leadership Workshop

    Strengthen product management in your organization through effective executive leadership by focusing on product teams, core capabilities, and proper alignment.

    Objective of this workshop

    To develop a common understanding and foundation for product management so we, as leaders, better understand how to lead product owners, product managers, and their teams.

    Enable Product Delivery - Executive Leadership Workshop

    Learn how enterprise agility can provide lasting value to the organization

    Clarify your role in supporting your teams to deliver lasting value to stakeholders and customers

    1. Understanding Your Top Challenges
      • Define your challenges, goals, and opportunities Agile and product management will impact.
    2. Transitioning from Projects to Product-centric Delivery
      • Understand the shift from fixed delivery to continuous improvement and delivery of value.
    3. Enterprise Agility and the Value of Change
      • Organizations need to embrace change and leverage smaller delivery cycles.
    4. Defining Your "Products" and Product Management
      • Define products in your culture and how to empower product delivery teams.
    5. Connecting Product Management to Agile Practices
      • Use product ownership to drive increased ROI into your product delivery teams and lifecycles.
    6. Commit to Empowering Agile Product Teams
      • Define the actions and changes you must make for this transformation to be successful.

    Your Product Transformation Journey

    1. Make the Case for Product Delivery
      • Align your organization with the practices to deliver what matters most
    2. Enable Product Delivery – Executive Workshop
      • One-day executive workshop – align and prepare your leadership
      • Audience: Senior executives and IT leadership.
        Size: 8-16 people
        Time: 6 hours
    3. Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision
      • Enhance product backlogs, roadmapping, and strategic alignment
      • Audience: Product Owners/Mangers
        Size: 10-20 people
        Time: 3-4 days
    4. Deliver Your Digital Products at Scale
      • Scale Product Families to Align Enterprise Goals
      • Audience: Product Owners/Mangers
        Size: 10-20 people
        Time: 3-4 days
    5. Mature and Scale Product Ownership
      • Align and mature your product owners
      • Audience: Product Owners/Mangers
        Size: 8-16 people
        Time: 2-4 days

    Repeat workshops with different companies, operating units, departments, or teams as needed.

    What is a workshop?

    We WILL ENGAGE in discussions and activities:

    • Flexible, to accommodate the needs of the group.
    • Open forum for discussion and questions.
    • Share your knowledge, expertise, and experiences (roadblocks and success stories).
    • Everyone is part of the process.
    • Builds upon itself.

    This workshop will NOT be:

    • A lecture or class.
    • A monologue that never ends.
    • Technical training.
    • A presentation.
    • Us making all the decisions.

    Roles within the workshop

    We each have a role to play to make our workshop successful!

    Facilitators

    • Introduce the best practice framework used by Info-Tech.
    • Ask questions about processes, procedures, and assumptions.
    • Guide for the methodology.
    • Liaison for any other relevant Info-Tech research or services.

    Participants

    • Contribute and speak out as much as needed.
    • Provide expertise on the current processes and technology.
    • Ask questions.
    • Provide feedback.
    • Collaborate and work together to produce solutions.

    Understanding Your Top Challenges

    • Understanding Your Top Challenges
    • Transitioning From Projects to Product-Centric Delivery
    • Enterprise Agility and the Value of Change
    • Defining Your Products and Product Management
    • Connecting Product Management to Agile Practices
    • Commit to Empowering Agile Product Teams
    • Wrap-Up and Retrospective

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    • Products are the lifeblood of an organization. They deliver the capabilities needed to deliver value to customers, internal users, and stakeholders.
    • The shift to becoming a product organization is intended to continually increase the value you provide to the broader organization as you grow and evolve.
    • You need to clearly convey the direction and strategy of your product portfolio to gain alignment, support, and funding from your organization.

    Common Obstacles

    • IT organizations are traditionally organized to deliver initiatives in specific periods of time. This conflicts with product delivery, which continuously delivers value over the lifetime of a product.
    • Delivering multiple products together creates additional challenges because each product has its own pedigree, history, and goals.
    • Product owners struggle to prioritize changes to deliver product value. This creates a gap and conflict between product and enterprise goals.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    Info-Tech's approach will guide you through:

    • Understanding the top challenges driving your product initiative.
    • Improving your transitioning from projects to product-centric delivery.
    • Enhancing enterprise agility and the value of change.
    • Defining products and product management in your context.
    • Connecting product management to Agile practices.
    • Committing to empowering Agile Product teams.
    This is an image of an Info-Tech Thought Map for Accelerate Your Transition to Product Delivery
    This is an image of an Info-Tech Thought Map for Delier on your Digital Product Vision
    This is an image of an Info-Tech Thought Map for Deliver Digital Products at Scale via Enterprise Product Families.
    This is an image of an Info-Tech Thought Map for What We Mean by an Applcation Department Strategy.

    What is driving your organization to become product focused?

    30 minutes

    • Team introductions:
      • Share your name and role
      • What are the key challenges you are looking to solve around product management?
      • What blockers or challenges will we need to overcome?

    Capture in the Enable Product Delivery – Executive Leadership Workshop Outcomes and Next Steps.

    Input

    • Organizational knowledge
    • Goals and challenges

    Output

    • List of key challenges
    • List of workshop expectations
    • Parking lot items

    Transitioning From Projects to Product-Centric Delivery

    • Understanding Your Top Challenges
    • Transitioning From Projects to Product-Centric Delivery
    • Enterprise Agility and the Value of Change
    • Defining Your Products and Product Management
    • Connecting Product Management to Agile Practices
    • Commit to Empowering Agile Product Teams
    • Wrap-Up and Retrospective

    Define the differences between projects and product delivery

    30 minutes

    • Consider project delivery and product delivery.
    • Discussion:
      • What are some differences between the two?

    Capture in the Enable Product Delivery – Executive Leadership Workshop Outcomes and Next Steps.

    Input

    • Organizational knowledge
    • Internal terms and definitions

    Output

    • List of differences between projects and product delivery

    Define the differences between projects and product delivery

    15 minutes

    Project Delivery

    vs

    Product Delivery

    Point in time

    What is changed

    Method of funding changes

    Needs an owner

    Input

    • Organizational knowledge
    • Internal terms and definitions

    Output

    • List of differences between projects and product delivery

    Capture in the Enable Product Delivery – Executive Leadership Workshop Outcomes and Next Steps.

    Identify the differences between a project-centric and a product-centric organization

    Project

    Product

    Fund Projects

    Funding

    Fund Products or Teams

    Line of Business Sponsor

    Prioritization

    Product Owner

    Makes Specific Changes
    to a Product

    Product Management

    Improve Product Maturity
    and Support

    Assign People to Work

    Work Allocation

    Assign Work
    to Product Teams

    Project Manager Manages

    Capacity Management

    Team Manages Capacity

    Info-Tech Insight

    Product delivery requires significant shifts in the way you complete development work and deliver value to your users. Make the changes that support improving end user value and enterprise alignment.

    Projects can be a mechanism for funding product changes and improvements

    This is an image showing the relationship between the project lifecycle, a hybrid lifecycle, and a product lifecycle.

    Projects within products

    Regardless of whether you recognize yourself as a "product-based" or "project-based" shop, the same basic principles should apply.

    You go through a period or periods of project-like development to build a version of an application or product.

    You also have parallel services along with your project development, which encompass the more product-based view. These may range from basic support and maintenance to full-fledged strategy teams or services like sales and marketing.

    While Agile and product are intertwined, they are not the same!

    Delivering products does not necessarily require an Agile mindset. However, Agile methods help facilitate the journey because product thinking is baked into them.

    This image shows the product delivery maturity process from waterfall to continuous integration and delivery.

    Product roadmaps guide delivery and communicate your strategy

    In Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision, we demonstrate how the product roadmap is core to value realization. The product roadmap is your communicated path, and as a product owner, you use it to align teams and changes to your defined goals while aligning your product to enterprise goals and strategy.

    This is an image adapted from Pichler, What is Product Management.

    Adapted from: Pichler, "What Is Product Management?"

    Info-Tech Insight

    The quality of your product backlog – and your ability to realize business value from your delivery pipeline – is directly related to the input, content, and prioritization of items in your product roadmap.

    Streamline Application Maintenance

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}402|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.5/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: 20 Average Days Saved
    • member rating average days saved: After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve.
    • Parent Category Name: Maintenance
    • Parent Category Link: /maintenance
    • Application maintenance teams are accountable for the various requests and incidents coming from a variety business and technical sources. The sheer volume and variety of requests create unmanageable backlogs.
    • The increasing complexity and reliance on technology within the business has set unrealistic expectations on maintenance teams. Stakeholders expect teams to accommodate maintenance without impact on project schedules.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Improving maintenance’s focus and attention may mean doing less but more valuable work. Teams need to be realistic about what can be committed and be prepared to justify why certain requests have to be pushed down the backlog (e.g. lack of business value, high risks).
    • Maintenance must be treated like any other development activity. The same intake and prioritization practices and quality standards must be upheld, and best practices followed.

    Impact and Result

    • Justify the necessity of streamlined maintenance. Gain a grounded understanding of stakeholder objectives and concerns, and validate their achievability against the current state of the people, process, and technologies involved in application maintenance.
    • Strengthen triaging and prioritization practices. Obtain a holistic picture of the business and technical impacts, risks, and urgencies of each accepted maintenance requests in order to justify its prioritization and relevance within your backlog. Identify opportunities to bundle requests together or integrate them within project commitments to ensure completion.
    • Establish and govern a repeatable process. Develop a maintenance process with well-defined stage gates, quality controls, and roles and responsibilities, and instill development best practices to improve the success of delivery.

    Streamline Application Maintenance Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our Executive Brief to understand the common struggles found in application maintenance, their root causes, and the Info-Tech methodology to overcoming these hurdles.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Understand your maintenance priorities

    Understand the stakeholder priorities driving changes in your application maintenance practice.

    • Streamline Application Maintenance – Phase 1: Assess the Current Maintenance Landscape
    • Application Maintenance Operating Model Template
    • Application Maintenance Resource Capacity Assessment
    • Application Maintenance Maturity Assessment

    2. Instill maintenance governance

    Identify the appropriate level of governance and enforcement to ensure accountability and quality standards are upheld across maintenance practices.

    • Streamline Application Maintenance – Phase 2: Develop a Maintenance Release Schedule

    3. Enhance triaging and prioritization practices

    Build a maintenance triage and prioritization scheme that accommodates business and IT risks and urgencies.

    • Streamline Application Maintenance – Phase 3: Optimize Maintenance Capabilities

    4. Streamline maintenance delivery

    Define and enforce quality standards in maintenance activities and build a high degree of transparency to readily address delivery challenges.

    • Streamline Application Maintenance – Phase 4: Streamline Maintenance Delivery
    • Application Maintenance Business Case Presentation Document
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Streamline Application Maintenance

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Understand Your Maintenance Priorities

    The Purpose

    Understand the business and IT stakeholder priorities driving the success of your application maintenance practice.

    Understand any current issues that are affecting your maintenance practice.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Awareness of business and IT priorities.

    An understanding of the maturity of your maintenance practices and identification of issues to alleviate.

    Activities

    1.1 Define priorities for enhanced maintenance practices.

    1.2 Conduct a current state assessment of your application maintenance practices.

    Outputs

    List of business and technical priorities

    List of the root-cause issues, constraints, and opportunities of current maintenance practice

    2 Instill Maintenance Governance

    The Purpose

    Define the processes, roles, and points of communication across all maintenance activities.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    An in-depth understanding of all maintenance activities and what they require to function effectively.

    Activities

    2.1 Modify your maintenance process.

    2.2 Define your maintenance roles and responsibilities.

    Outputs

    Application maintenance process flow

    List of metrics to gauge success

    Maintenance roles and responsibilities

    Maintenance communication flow

    3 Enhance Triaging and Prioritization Practices

    The Purpose

    Understand in greater detail the process and people involved in receiving and triaging a request.

    Define your criteria for value, impact, and urgency, and understand how these fit into a prioritization scheme.

    Understand backlog management and release planning tactics to accommodate maintenance.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    An understanding of the stakeholders needed to assess and approve requests.

    The criteria used to build a tailored prioritization scheme.

    Tactics for efficient use of resources and ideal timing of the delivery of changes.

    A process that ensures maintenance teams are always working on tasks that are valuable to the business.

    Activities

    3.1 Review your maintenance intake process.

    3.2 Define a request prioritization scheme.

    3.3 Create a set of practices to manage your backlog and release plans.

    Outputs

    Understanding of the maintenance request intake process

    Approach to assess the impact, urgency, and severity of requests for prioritization

    List of backlog management grooming and release planning practices

    4 Streamline Maintenance Delivery

    The Purpose

    Understand how to apply development best practices and quality standards to application maintenance.

    Learn the methods for monitoring and visualizing maintenance work.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    An understanding of quality standards and the scenarios for where they apply.

    The tactics to monitor and visualize maintenance work.

    Streamlined maintenance delivery process with best practices.

    Activities

    4.1 Define approach to monitor maintenance work.

    4.2 Define application quality attributes.

    4.3 Discuss best practices to enhance maintenance development and deployment.

    Outputs

    Taskboard structure and rules

    Definition of application quality attributes with user scenarios

    List of best practices to streamline maintenance development and deployment

    5 Finalize Your Maintenance Practice

    The Purpose

    Create a target state built from appropriate metrics and attainable goals.

    Consider the required items and steps for the implementation of your optimization initiatives.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A realistic target state for your optimized application maintenance practice.

    A well-defined and structured roadmap for the implementation of your optimization initiatives.

    Activities

    5.1 Refine your target state maintenance practices.

    5.2 Develop a roadmap to achieve your target state.

    Outputs

    Finalized application maintenance process document

    Roadmap of initiatives to achieve your target state

    Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}582|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $10,000 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 5 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Strategy & Operating Model
    • Parent Category Link: /strategy-and-operating-model
    • EA governance is perceived as an unnecessary layer of bureaucracy because business benefits are poorly communicated.
    • The organization doesn’t have a formalized EA practice.
    • Where an EA practice exists, employees are unsure of EA’s roles and responsibilities.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Enterprise architecture is not a technical function – it should be business-value driven and forward looking, positioning organizational assets in favor of long-term strategy rather than short-term tactics.

    Impact and Result

    • Value-focused. Focus EA governance on helping the organization achieve business benefits. Promote EA’s contribution in realizing business value.
    • Right-sized. Re-use existing process checkpoints rather than creating new ones. Clearly define EA governance inclusion criteria for projects.
    • Defined and measured process. Define metrics to measure EA’s performance and integrate EA governance with other governance processes such as project governance. Also clearly define the EA governing bodies’ composition, domain, inputs, and outputs.
    • Strike the right balance. Adopt architecture principles that strikes the right balance between business and technology.

    Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our Executive Brief to find out how implementing a successful enterprise architecture governance framework can benefit your organization.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Current State of EA Governance

    Identify the organization’s standing in terms of the enterprise architecture practice, and know the gaps and what the EA practice needs to fulfill to create a good governance framework.

    • Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework – Phase 1: Current State of EA Governance
    • EA Capability – Risk and Complexity Assessment Tool
    • EA Governance Assessment Tool

    2. EA Fundamentals

    Understand the EA fundamentals and then refresh them to better align the EA practice with the organization and create business benefit.

    • Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework – Phase 2: EA Fundamentals
    • EA Vision and Mission Template
    • EA Goals and Measures Template
    • EA Principles Template

    3. Engagement Model

    Analyze the IT operating model and identify EA’s role at each stage; refine it to promote effective EA engagement upfront in the early stages of the IT operating model.

    • Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework – Phase 3: Engagement Model
    • EA Engagement Model Template

    4. EA Governing Bodies

    Set up EA governing bodies to provide guidance and foster a collaborative environment by identifying the correct number of EA governing bodies, defining the game plan to initialize the governing bodies, and creating an architecture review process.

    • Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework – Phase 4: EA Governing Bodies
    • Architecture Board Charter Template
    • Architecture Review Process Template

    5. EA Policy

    Create an EA policy to provide a set of guidelines designed to direct and constrain the architecture actions of the organization in the pursuit of its goals in order to improve architecture compliance and drive business value.

    • Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework – Phase 5: EA Policy
    • EA Policy Template
    • EA Assessment Checklist Template
    • EA Compliance Waiver Process Template
    • EA Compliance Waiver Form Template

    6. Architectural Standards

    Define architecture standards to facilitate information exchange, improve collaboration, and provide stability. Develop a process to update the architectural standards to ensure relevancy and promote process transparency.

    • Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework – Phase 6: Architectural Standards
    • Architecture Standards Update Process Template

    7. Communication Plan

    Craft a plan to engage the relevant stakeholders, ascertain the benefits of the initiative, and identify the various communication methods in order to maximize the chances of success.

    • Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework – Phase 7: Communication Plan
    • EA Governance Communication Plan Template
    • EA Governance Framework Template
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Current State of EA governance (Pre-workshop)

    The Purpose

    Conduct stakeholder interviews to understand current state of EA practice and prioritize gaps for EA governance based on organizational complexity.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Prioritized list of actions to arrive at the target state based on the complexity of the organization

    Activities

    1.1 Determine organizational complexity.

    1.2 Conduct an assessment of the EA governance components.

    1.3 Identify and prioritize gaps.

    1.4 Conduct senior management interviews.

    Outputs

    Organizational complexity score

    EA governance current state and prioritized list of EA governance component gaps

    Stakeholder perception of the EA practice

    2 EA Fundamentals and Engagement Model

    The Purpose

    Refine EA fundamentals to align the EA practice with the organization and identify EA touchpoints to provide guidance for projects.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Alignment of EA goals and objectives with the goals and objectives of the organization

    Early involvement of EA in the IT operating model

    Activities

    2.1 Review the output of the organizational complexity and EA assessment tools.

    2.2 Craft the EA vision and mission.

    2.3 Develop the EA principles.

    2.4 Identify the EA goals.

    2.5 Identify EA engagement touchpoints within the IT operating model.

    Outputs

    EA vision and mission statement

    EA principles

    EA goals and measures

    Identified EA engagement touchpoints and EA level of involvement

    3 EA Governing Bodies

    The Purpose

    Set up EA governing bodies to provide guidance and foster a collaborative environment by identifying the correct number of EA governing bodies, defining the game plan to initialize the governing bodies and creating an architecture review process.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Business benefits are maximized and solution design is within the options set forth by the architectural reference models while no additional layers of bureaucracy are introduced

    Activities

    3.1 Identify the number of governing bodies.

    3.2 Define the game plan to initialize the governing bodies.

    3.3 Define the architecture review process.

    Outputs

    Architecture board structure and coverage

    Identified architecture review template

    4 EA Policy

    The Purpose

    Create an EA policy to provide a set of guidelines designed to direct and constrain the architecture actions of the organization in the pursuit of its goals in order to improve architecture compliance and drive business value.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Improved architecture compliance, which ties investments to business value and provides guidance to architecture practitioners

    Activities

    4.1 Define the scope.

    4.2 Identify the target audience.

    4.3 Determine the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

    4.4 Craft an assessment checklist.

    Outputs

    Defined scope

    Inclusion and exclusion criteria for project review

    Architecture assessment checklist

    5 Architectural Standards and Communication Plan

    The Purpose

    Define architecture standards to facilitate information exchange, improve collaboration, and provide stability.

    Craft a communication plan to implement the new EA governance framework in order to maximize the chances of success.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Consistent development of architecture, increased information exchange between stakeholders

    Improved process transparency

    Improved stakeholder engagement

    Activities

    5.1 Identify and standardize EA work products.

    5.2 Classifying the architectural standards.

    5.3 Identifying the custodian of standards.

    5.4 Update the standards.

    5.5 List the changes identified in the EA governance initiative

    5.6 Create a communication plan.

    Outputs

    Identified set of EA work products to standardize

    Architecture information taxonomy

    Identified set of custodian of standards

    Standard update process

    List of EA governance initiatives

    Communication plan for EA governance initiatives

    Further reading

    Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework

    Focus on process standardization, repeatability, and sustainability.

    ANALYST PERSPECTIVE

    "Enterprise architecture is not a technology concept, rather it is the foundation on which businesses orient themselves to create and capture value in the marketplace. Designing architecture is not a simple task and creating organizations for the future requires forward thinking and rigorous planning.

    Architecture processes that are supposed to help facilitate discussions and drive option analysis are often seen as an unnecessary overhead. The negative perception is due to enterprise architecture groups being overly prescriptive rather than providing a set of options that guide and constrain solutions at the same time.

    EA groups should do away with the direct and control mindset and change to a collaborate and mentor mindset. As part of the architecture governance, EA teams should provide an option set that constrains design choices, and also be open to changes to standards or best practices. "

    Gopi Bheemavarapu, Sr. Manager, CIO Advisory Info-Tech Research Group

    Our understanding of the problem

    This Research Is Designed For:

    • CIO
    • IT Leaders
    • Business Leaders
    • Head of Enterprise Architecture
    • Enterprise Architects
    • Domain Architects
    • Solution Architects

    This Research Will Help You:

    • Understand the importance of enterprise architecture (EA) governance and how to apply it to guide architectural decisions.
    • Enhance your understanding of the organization’s current EA governance and identify areas for improvement.
    • Optimize your EA engagement model to maximize value creation.
    • Learn how to set up the optimal number of governance bodies in order to avoid bureaucratizing the organization.

    This Research Will Also Assist:

    • Business Relationship Managers
    • Business Analysts
    • IT Managers
    • Project Managers
    • IT Analysts
    • Quality Assurance Leads
    • Software Developers

    This Research Will Help Them:

    • Give an overview of enterprise architecture governance
    • Clarity on the role of enterprise architecture team

    Executive summary

    Situation

    • Deployed solutions do not meet business objectives resulting in expensive and extensive rework.
    • Each department acts independently without any regular EA touchpoints.
    • Organizations practice project-level architecture as opposed to enterprise architecture.

    Complication

    • EA governance is perceived as an unnecessary layer of bureaucracy because business benefits are poorly communicated.
    • The organization doesn’t have a formalized EA practice.
    • Where an EA practice exists, employees are unsure of EA’s roles and responsibilities.

    Resolution

    • Value-focused. Focus EA governance on helping the organization achieve business benefits. Promote EA’s contribution in realizing business value.
    • Right-sized. Re-use existing process checkpoints, rather than creating new ones. Clearly define EA governance inclusion criteria for projects.
    • Defined and measured process. Define metrics to measure EA’s performance and integrate EA governance with other governance processes such as project governance. Also clearly define the EA governing bodies’ composition, domain, inputs, and outputs.
    • Strike the right balance. Adopt architecture principles that strikes the right balance between business and technology imperatives.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Enterprise architecture is critical to ensuring that an organization has the solid IT foundation it needs to efficiently enable the achievement of its current and future strategic goals rather than focusing on short-term tactical gains.

    What is enterprise architecture governance?

    An architecture governance process is the set of activities an organization executes to ensure that decisions are made and accountability is enforced during the execution of its architecture strategy. (Hopkins, “The Essential EA Toolkit.”)

    EA governance includes the following:

    • Implement a system of controls over the creation and monitoring of all architectural components.
    • Ensure effective introduction, implementation, and evolution of architectures within the organization.
    • Implement a system to ensure compliance with internal and external standards and regulatory obligations.
    • Develop practices that ensure accountability to a clearly identified stakeholder community, both inside and outside the organization.

    (TOGAF)

    IT governance sets direction through prioritization and decision making, and monitors overall IT performance.

    The image shows a circle set within a larger circle. The inner circle is connected to the bottom of the larger circle. The inner circle is labelled EA Governance and the larger circle is labelled IT Governance.

    EA governance ensures that optimal architectural design choices are being made that focus on long-term value creation.

    Harness the benefits of an optimized EA governance

    Core benefits of EA governance are seen through:

    Value creation

    Effective EA governance ensures alignment between organizational investments and corporate strategic goals and objectives.

    Cost reduction

    Architecture standards provide guidance to identify opportunities for reuse and eliminate redundancies in an organization.

    Risk optimization

    Architecture review processes and assessment checklists ensure that solutions are within the acceptable risk levels of the organization.

    EA governance is difficult to structure appropriately, but having an effective structure will allow you to:

    • Achieve business strategy through faster time-to-market innovations and capabilities.
    • Reduced transaction costs with more consistent business processes and information across business units.
    • Lower IT costs due to better traceability, faster design, and lower risk.
    • Link IT investments to organizational strategies and objectives
    • Integrate and institutionalizes IT best practices.
    • Enable the organization to take full advantage of its information, infrastructure, and hardware and software assets.
    • Support regulatory as well as best practice requirements such as auditability, security, responsibility, and accountability.

    Organizations that have implemented EA governance realize greater benefits from their EA programs

    Modern day CIOs of high-performing organizations use EA as a strategic planning discipline to improve business-IT alignment, enable innovation, and link business and IT strategies to execution.

    Recent Info-Tech research found that organizations that establish EA governance realize greater benefits from their EA initiatives.

    The image shows a bar graph, with Impact from EA on the Y-axis, and different initiatives listed on the X-axis. Each initiative has two bars connected to it, with a blue bar representing answers of No and the grey bar representing answers of Yes.

    (Info-Tech Research Group, N=89)

    Measure EA governance implementation effectiveness

    Define key operational measures for internal use by IT and EA practitioners. Also, define business value measures that communicate and demonstrate the value of EA as an “enabler” of business outcomes to senior executives.

    EA performance measures (lead, operational) EA value measures (lag)
    Application of EA management process EA’s contribution to IT performance EA’s contribution to business value

    Enterprise Architecture Management

    • Number of months since the last review of target state EA blueprints.

    IT Investment Portfolio Management

    • Percentage of projects that were identified and proposed by EA.

    Solution Development

    • Number of projects that passed EA reviews.
    • Number of building blocks reused.

    Operations Management

    • Reduction in the number of applications with overlapping functionality.

    Business Value

    • Lower non-discretionary IT spend.
    • Decreased time to production.
    • Higher satisfaction of IT-enabled services.

    An insurance provider adopts a value-focused, right-sized EA governance program

    CASE STUDY

    Industry Insurance

    Source Info-Tech

    Situation

    The insurance sector has been undergoing major changes, and as a reaction, businesses within the sector have been embracing technology to provide innovative solutions.

    The head of EA in a major insurance provider (henceforth to be referred to as “INSPRO01”) was given the mandate to ensure that solutions are architected right the first time to maximize reuse and reduce technology debt. The EA group was at a critical point – to demonstrate business value or become irrelevant.

    Complication

    The project management office had been accountable for solution architecture and had placed emphasis on short-term project cost savings at the expense of long term durability.

    There was a lack of awareness of the Enterprise Architecture group within INSPRO01, and people misunderstood the roles and responsibilities of the EA team.

    Result

    Info-Tech helped define the responsibilities of the EA team and clarify the differences between the role of a Solution Architect vs. Enterprise Architect.

    The EA team was able to make the case for change in the project management practices to ensure architectures are reviewed and approved prior to implementation.

    As a result, INSPRO01 saw substantial increases in reuse opportunities and thereby derived more value from its technology investments.

    Success factors for EA governance

    The success of any EA governance initiative revolves around adopting best practices, setting up repeatable processes, and establishing appropriate controls.

    1. Develop best practices for managing architecture policies, procedures, roles, skills, and organizational structures.
    2. Establish organizational responsibilities and structures to support the architecture governance processes.
    3. Management of criteria for the control of the architecture governance processes, dispensations, compliance assessments, and SLAs.

    Info-Tech’s approach to EA governance

    Our best-practice approach is grounded in TOGAF and enhanced by the insights and guidance from our analysts, industry experts, and our clients.

    Value-focused. Focus EA governance on helping the organization achieve business benefits. Promote EA’s contribution in realizing business value.

    Right-sized. Insert EA governance into existing process checkpoints rather than creating new ones. Clearly define EA governance inclusion criteria for projects.

    Measured. Define metrics to measure EA’s performance, and integrate EA governance with other governance processes such as project governance. Also clearly define the EA governing bodies’ composition, domain, inputs, and outputs.

    Balanced. Adopt architecture principles that strikes the right balance between business and technology.

    Info-Tech’s EA governance framework

    Info-Tech’s architectural governance framework provides a value-focused, right-sized approach with a strong emphasis on process standardization, repeatability, and sustainability.

    1. Current state of EA governance
    2. EA fundamentals
    3. Engagement model
    4. EA governing bodies
    5. EA policy
    6. Architectural standards
    7. Communication Plan

    Use Info-Tech’s templates to complete this project

    1. Current state of EA governance
      • EA Capability - Risk and Complexity Assessment Tool
      • EA Governance Assessment Tool
    2. EA fundamentals
      • EA Vision and Mission Template
      • EA Goals and Measures Template
      • EA Principles Template
    3. Engagement model
      • EA Engagement Model Template
    4. EA governing bodies
      • Architecture Board Charter Template
      • Architecture Review Process Template
    5. EA policy
      • EA Policy Template
      • Architecture Assessment Checklist Template
      • Compliance Waiver Process Template
      • Compliance Waiver Form Template
    6. Architectural standards
      • Architecture Standards Update Process Template
    7. Communication Plan
      • EA Governance Communication Plan Template
      • EA Governance Framework Template

    As you move through the project, capture your progress with a summary in the EA Governance Framework Template.

    Download the EA Governance Framework Template document for use throughout this project.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    “Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

    Workshop

    “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

    Consulting

    “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    EA governance framework – phase-by-phase outline (1/2)

    Current state of EA governance EA Fundamentals Engagement Model EA Governing Bodies
    Best-Practice Toolkit

    1.1 Determine organizational complexity

    1.2 Conduct an assessment of the EA governance components

    1.3 Identify and prioritize gaps

    2.1 Craft the EA vision and mission

    2.2 Develop the EA principles

    2.3 Identify the EA goals

    3.1 Build the case for EA engagement

    3.2 Identify engagement touchpoints within the IT operating model

    4.1 Identify the number of governing bodies

    4.2 Define the game plan to initialize the governing bodies

    4.3 Define the architecture review process

    Guided Implementations
    • Determine organizational complexity
    • Assess current state of EA governance
    • Develop the EA fundamentals
    • Review the EA fundamentals
    • Review the current IT operating model
    • Determine the target engagement model
    • Identify architecture boards and develop charters
    • Develop an architecture review process

    Phase 1 Results:

    • EA Capability - risk and complexity assessment
    • EA governance assessment

    Phase 2 Results:

    • EA vision and mission
    • EA goals and measures
    • EA principles

    Phase 3 Results:

    • EA engagement model

    Phase 4 Results:

    • Architecture board charter
    • Architecture review process

    EA governance framework – phase-by-phase outline (2/2)

    EA Policy Architectural Standards Communication Plan
    Best-Practice Toolkit

    5.1 Define the scope of EA policy

    5.2 Identify the target audience

    5.3 Determine the inclusion and exclusion criteria

    5.4 Craft an assessment checklist

    6.1 Identify and standardize EA work products

    6.2 Classify the architectural standards

    6.3 Identify the custodian of standards

    6.4 Update the standards

    7.1 List the changes identified in the EA governance initiative

    7.2 Identify stakeholders

    7.3 Create a communication plan

    Guided Implementations
    • EA policy, assessment checklists, and decision types
    • Compliance waivers
    • Understand architectural standards
    • EA repository and updating the standards
    • Create a communication plan
    • Review the communication plan

    Phase 5 Results:

    • EA policy
    • Architecture assessment checklist
    • Compliance waiver process
    • Compliance waiver form

    Phase 6 Results:

    • Architecture standards update process

    Phase 7 Results:

    • Communication plan
    • EA governance framework

    Workshop overview

    Contact your account representative or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Pre-workshopWorkshop Day 1Workshop Day 2Workshop Day 3Workshop Day 4
    ActivitiesCurrent state of EA governance EA fundamentals and engagement model EA governing bodies EA policy Architectural standards and

    communication plan

    1.1 Determine organizational complexity

    1.2 Conduct an assessment of the EA governance components

    1.3 Identify and prioritize gaps

    1.4 Senior management interviews

    1. Review the output of the organizational complexity and EA assessment tools
    2. Craft the EA vision and mission
    3. Develop the EA principles.
    4. Identify the EA goals
    5. Identify EA engagement touchpoints within the IT operating model
    1. Identify the number of governing bodies
    2. Define the game plan to initialize the governing bodies
    3. Define the architecture review process
    1. Define the scope
    2. Identify the target audience
    3. Determine the inclusion and exclusion criteria
    4. Craft an assessment checklist
    1. Identify and standardize EA work products
    2. Classifying the architectural standards
    3. Identifying the custodian of standards
    4. Updating the standards
    5. List the changes identified in the EA governance initiative
    6. Identify stakeholders
    7. Create a communication plan
    Deliverables
    1. EA Capability - risk and complexity assessment tool
    2. EA governance assessment tool
    1. EA vision and mission template
    2. EA goals and measures template
    3. EA principles template
    4. EA engagement model template
    1. Architecture board charter template
    2. Architecture review process template
    1. EA policy template
    2. Architecture assessment checklist template
    3. Compliance waiver process template
    4. Compliance waiver form template
    1. Architecture standards update process template
    2. Communication plan template

    Phase 1

    Current State of EA Governance

    Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework

    Current State of EA Governance

    1. Current State of EA Governance
    2. EA Fundamentals
    3. Engagement Model
    4. EA Governing Bodies
    5. EA Policy
    6. Architectural Standards
    7. Communication Plan

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Determine organizational complexity
    • Conduct an assessment of the EA governance components
    • Identify and prioritize gaps

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Leaders
    • Business Leaders
    • Head of Enterprise Architecture
    • Enterprise Architects
    • Domain Architects
    • Solution Architects

    Outcomes of this step

    • Prioritized list of gaps

    Info-Tech Insight

    Correlation is not causation – an apparent problem might be a symptom rather than a cause. Assess the organization’s current EA governance to discover the root cause and go beyond the symptoms.

    Phase 1 guided implementation outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 1: Current State of EA Governance

    Proposed Time to Completion: 2 weeks

    Step 1.1: Determine organizational complexity

    Start with an analyst kick-off call:

    • Discuss how to use Info-Tech’s EA Capability – Risk and Complexity Assessment Tool.
    • Discuss how to complete the inputs on the EA Governance Assessment Tool.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Conduct an assessment of your organization to determine its complexity.
    • Assess the state of EA governance within your organization.

    With these tools & templates:

    • EA Capability – Risk and Complexity Assessment Tool
    • EA Governance Assessment Tool

    Step 1.2: Assess current state of EA governance

    Start with an analyst kick-off call:

    • Review the output of the EA governance assessment and gather feedback on your goals for the EA practice.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Discuss whether you are ready to proceed with the project.
    • Review the list of tasks and plan your next steps.

    With these tools & templates:

    • EA Governance Assessment Tool

    Right-size EA governance based on organizational complexity

    Determining organizational complexity is not rocket science. Use Info-Tech’s tool to quantify the complexity and use it, along with common sense, to determine the appropriate level of architecture governance.

    Info-Tech’s methodology uses six factors to determine the complexity of the organization:

    1. The size of the organization, which can often be denoted by the revenue, headcount, number of applications in use, and geographical diversity.
    2. The solution alignment factor helps indicate the degree to which various projects map to the organization’s strategy.
    3. The size and complexity of the IT infrastructure and networks.
    4. The portfolio of applications maintained by the IT organization.
    5. Key changes within the organization such as M&A, regulatory changes, or a change in business or technology leadership.
    6. Other negative influences that can adversely affect the organization.

    Determine your organization’s level of complexity

    1.1 2 hours

    Input

    • Group consensus on the current state of EA competencies.

    Output

    • A list of gaps that need to be addressed for EA governance competencies.

    Materials

    • Info-Tech’s EA assessment tool, a computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, business line leads, IT department leads.

    The image shows a screenshot of the Table of Contents with the EA Capability section highlighted.

    Step 1 - Facilitate

    Download the EA Capability – Risk and Complexity Assessment Tool to facilitate a session on determining your organization’s complexity.

    Download EA Organizational - Risk and Complexity Assessment Tool

    Step 2 - Summarize

    Summarize the results in the EA governance framework document.

    Update the EA Governance Framework Template

    Understand the components of effective EA governance

    EA governance is multi-faceted and it facilitates effective use of resources to meet organizational strategic objectives through well-defined structural elements.

    EA Governance

    • Fundamentals
    • Engagement Model
    • Policy
    • Governing Bodies
    • Architectural Standards

    Components of architecture governance

    1. EA vision, mission, goals, metrics, and principles that provide a direction for the EA practice.
    2. An engagement model showing where and in what fashion EA is engaged in the IT operating model.
    3. An architecture policy formulated and enforced by the architectural governing bodies to guide and constrain architectural choices in pursuit of strategic goals.
    4. Governing bodies to assess projects for compliance and provide feedback.
    5. Architectural standards that codify the EA work products to ensure consistent development of architecture.

    Next Step: Based on the organization’s complexity, conduct a current state assessment of EA governance using Info-Tech’s EA Governance Assessment Tool.

    Assess the components of EA governance in your organization

    1.2 2 hrs

    Input

    • Group consensus on the current state of EA competencies.

    Output

    • A list of gaps that need to be addressed for EA governance competencies.

    Materials

    • Info-Tech’s EA assessment tool, a computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, business line leads, IT department leads.

    The image shows a screenshot of the Table of Contents with the EA Governance section highlighted.

    Step 1 - Facilitate

    Download the “EA Governance Assessment Tool” to facilitate a session on identifying the best practices to be applied in your organization.

    Download Info-Tech’s EA Governance Assessment Tool

    Step 2 - Summarize

    Summarize the identified best practices in the EA governance framework document.

    Update the EA Governance Framework Template


    Conduct a current state assessment to identify limitations of the existing EA governance framework

    CASE STUDY

    Industry Insurance

    Source Info-Tech

    Situation

    INSPRO01 was planning a major transformation initiative. The organization determined that EA is a strategic function.

    The CIO had pledged support to the EA group and had given them a mandate to deliver long-term strategic architecture.

    The business leaders did not trust the EA team and believed that lack of business skills in the group put the business transformation at risk.

    Complication

    The EA group had been traditionally seen as a technology organization that helps with software design.

    The EA team lacked understanding of the business and hence there had been no common language between business and technology.

    Result

    Info-Tech helped the EA team create a set of 10 architectural principles that are business-value driven rather than technical statements.

    The team socialized the principles with the business and technology stakeholders and got their approvals.

    By applying the business focused architectural principles, the EA team was able to connect with the business leaders and gain their support.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    Key Activities

    • Determine organizational complexity.
    • Conduct an assessment of the EA governance components.
    • Identify and prioritize gaps.

    Outcomes

    • Organizational complexity assessment
    • EA governance capability assessment
    • A prioritized list of capability gaps

    Phase 2

    EA Fundamentals

    Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework

    EA Fundamentals

    1. Current State of EA Governance
    2. EA Fundamentals
    3. Engagement Model
    4. EA Governing Bodies
    5. EA Policy
    6. Architectural Standards
    7. Communication Plan

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Craft the EA vision and mission
    • Develop the EA principles.
    • Identify the EA goals

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Leaders
    • Business Leaders
    • Head of Enterprise Architecture
    • Enterprise Architects
    • Domain Architects
    • Solution Architects

    Outcomes of this step

    • Refined set of EA fundamentals to support the building of EA governance

    Info-Tech Insight

    A house divided against itself cannot stand – ensure that the EA fundamentals are aligned with the organization’s goals and objectives.

    Phase 2 guided implementation outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 2: EA Fundamentals

    Proposed Time to Completion: 3 weeks

    Step 2.1: Develop the EA fundamentals

    Review findings with analyst:

    • Discuss the importance of the EA fundamentals – vision, mission, goals, measures, and principles.
    • Understand how to align the EA vision, mission, goals, and measures to your organization’s vision, mission, goals, measures, and principles.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Develop the EA vision statements.
    • Craft the EA mission statements.
    • Define EA goals and measures.
    • Adopt EA principles.

    With these tools & templates:

    • EA Vision and Mission Template
    • EA Principles Template
    • EA Goals and Measures Template

    Step 2.2: Review the EA fundamentals

    Review findings with analyst:

    • Review the EA fundamentals in conjunction with the results of the EA governance assessment tool and gather feedback.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Refine the EA vision, mission, goals, measures, and principles.
    • Review the list of tasks and plan your next steps.

    With these tools & templates:

    • EA Vision and Mission Template
    • EA Principles Template
    • EA Goals and Measures Template

    Fundamentals of an EA organization

    Vision, mission, goals and measures, and principles form the foundation of the EA function.

    Factors to consider when developing the vision and mission statements

    The vision and mission statements provide strategic direction to the EA team. These statements should be created based on the business and technology drivers in the organization.

    Business Drivers

    • Business drivers are factors that determine, or cause, an increase in value or major improvement of a business.
    • Examples of business drivers include:
      • Increased revenue
      • Customer retention
      • Salesforce effectiveness
      • Innovation

    Technology Drivers

    • Technology drivers are factors that are vital for the continued success and growth of a business using effective technologies.
    • Examples of technology drivers include:
      • Enterprise integration
      • Information security
      • Portability
      • Interoperability

    "The very essence of leadership is [that] you have a vision. It's got to be a vision you articulate clearly and forcefully on every occasion. You can't blow an uncertain trumpet." – Theodore Hesburgh

    Develop vision, mission, goals, measures, and principles to define the EA capability direction and purpose

    EA capability vision statement

    Articulates the desired future state of EA capability expressed in the present tense.

    • What will be the role of EA capability?
    • How will EA capability be perceived?

    Example: To be recognized by both the business and IT as a trusted partner that drives [Company Name]’s effectiveness, efficiency, and agility.

    EA capability mission statement

    Articulates the fundamental purpose of the EA capability.

    • Why does EA capability exist?
    • What does EA capability do to realize its vision?
    • Who are the key customers of the EA capability?

    Example: Define target enterprise architecture for [Company Name], identify solution opportunities, inform IT investment management, and direct solution development, acquisition, and operation compliance.

    EA capability goals and measures

    EA capability goals define specific desired outcomes of an EA management process execution. EA capability measures define how to validate the achievement of the EA capability goals.

    Example:

    Goal: Improve reuse of IT assets at [Company Name].

    Measures:

    • The number of building blocks available for reuse.
    • Percent of projects that utilized existing building blocks.
    • Estimated efficiency gain (= effort to create a building block * reuse count).

    EA principles

    EA principles are shared, long-lasting beliefs that guide the use of IT in constructing, transforming, and operating the enterprise by informing and restricting target-state enterprise architecture design, solution development, and procurement decisions.

    Example:

    • EA principle name: Reuse.
    • Statement: Maximize reuse of existing assets.
    • Rationale: Reuse prevents duplication of development and support efforts, increasing efficiency, and agility.
    • Implications: Define architecture and solution building blocks and ensure their consistent application.

    EA principles guide decision making

    Policies can be seen as “the letter of the law,” whereas EA principles summarize “the spirit of the law.”

    The image shows a graphic with EA Principles listed at the top, with an arrow pointing down to Decisions on the use of IT. At the bottom are domain-specific policies, with two arrows pointing upwards: the arrow on the left is labelled direct, and the arrow on the right is labelled control. The arrow points up to the label Decisions on the use of IT. On the left, there is an arrow pointing both up and down. At the top it is labelled The spirit of the law, and at the bottom, The letter of the law. On the right, there is another arrow pointing both up and down, labelled How should decisions be made at the top and labelled Who has the accountability and authority to make decisions? at the bottom.

    Define EA capability goals and related measures that resonate with EA capability stakeholders

    EA capability goals, i.e. specific desired outcomes of an EA management process execution. Use COBIT 5, APO03 process goals, and metrics as a starting point.

    The image shows a chart titled Manage Enterprise Architecture.

    Define relevant business value measures to collect indirect evidence of EA’s contribution to business benefits

    Define key operational measures for internal use by IT and EA practitioners. Also, define business value measures that communicate and demonstrate the value of EA as an enabler of business outcomes to senior executives.

    EA performance measures (lead, operational) EA value measures (lag)
    Application of EA management process EA’s contribution to IT performance EA’s contribution to business value

    Enterprise Architecture Management

    • Number of months since the last review of target state EA blueprints.

    IT Investment Portfolio Management

    • Percentage of projects that were identified and proposed by EA.

    Solution Development

    • Number of projects that passed EA reviews.
    • Number of building blocks reused.

    Operations Management

    • Reduction in the number of applications with overlapping functionality.

    Business Value

    • Lower non-discretionary IT spend.
    • Decreased time to production.
    • Higher satisfaction of IT-enabled services.

    Refine the organization’s EA fundamentals

    2.1 2 hrs

    Input

    • Group consensus on the current state of EA competencies.

    Output

    • A list of gaps that need to be addressed for EA governance competencies.

    Materials

    • Info-Tech’s EA assessment tool, a computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, business line leads, IT department leads.

    The image shows the Table of Contents with four sections highlighted, beginning with EA Vision Statement and ending with EA Goals and Measures.

    Step 1 - Facilitate

    Download the three templates and hold a working session to facilitate a session on creating EA fundamentals.

    Download the EA Vision and Mission Template, the EA Principles Template, and the EA Goals and Measures Template

    Step 2 - Summarize

    Document the final vision, mission, principles, goals, and measures within the EA Governance Framework.

    Update the EA Governance Framework Template


    Ensure that the EA fundamentals are aligned to the organizational needs

    CASE STUDY

    Industry Insurance

    Source Info-Tech

    Situation

    The EA group at INSPRO01 was being pulled in multiple directions with requests ranging from architecture review to solution design to code reviews.

    Project level architecture was being practiced with no clarity on the end goal. This led to EA being viewed as just another IT function without any added benefits.

    Info-Tech recommended that the EA team ensure that the fundamentals (vision, mission, principles, goals, and measures) reflect what the team aspired to achieve before fixing any of the process concerns.

    Complication

    The EA team was mostly comprised of technical people and hence the best practices outlined were not driven by business value.

    The team had no documented vision and mission statements in place. In addition, the existing goals and measures were not tied to the business strategic objectives.

    The team had architectural principles documented, but there were too many and they were very technical in nature.

    Result

    With Info-Tech’s guidance, the team developed a vision and mission statement to succinctly communicate the purpose of the EA function.

    The team also reduced and simplified the EA principles to make sure they were value driven and communicated in business terms.

    Finally, the team proposed goals and measures to track the performance of the EA team.

    With the fundamentals in place, the team was able to show the value of EA and gain organization-wide acceptance.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    Key Activities

    • Craft the EA vision and mission.
    • Develop the EA principles.
    • Identify the EA goals.

    Outcomes

    • Refined set of EA fundamentals to support the building of EA governance.

    Phase 3

    Engagement Model

    Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework

    Engagement Model

    1. Current state of EA governance
    2. EA fundamentals
    3. Engagement model
    4. EA governing bodies
    5. EA policy
    6. Architectural standards
    7. Communication Plan

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Build the case for EA engagement
    • Engagement touchpoints within the IT operating model

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Leaders
    • Business Leaders
    • Head of Enterprise Architecture
    • Enterprise Architects
    • Domain Architects
    • Solution Architects

    Outcomes of this step

    • Summary of the assessment of the current EA engagement model
    • Target EA engagement model

    Info-Tech Insight

    Perform due diligence prior to decision making. Use the EA Engagement Model to promote conversations between stage gate meetings as opposed to having the conversation during the stage gate meetings.

    Phase 3 guided implementation outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 3: EA engagement model

    Proposed Time to Completion: 2 weeks

    Step 3.1 Review the current IT operating model

    Start with an analyst kick-off call:

    • Review Info-Tech’s IT operating model.
    • Understand how to document your organization’s IT operating model.
    • Document EA’s current role and responsibility at each stage of the IT operating model.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Document your organization’s IT operating model.

    With these tools & templates:

    • EA Engagement Model Template

    Step 3.2: Determine the target engagement model

    Review findings with analyst:

    • Review your organization’s current state IT operating model.
    • Review your EA’s role and responsibility at each stage of the IT operating model.
    • Document the role and responsibility of EA in the future state.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Document EA’s future role within each stage of your organization’s IT operating model.

    With these tools & templates:

    • EA Engagement Model Template.

    The three pillars of EA Engagement

    Effective EA engagement revolves around three basic principles – generating business benefits, creating adaptable models, and being able to replicate the process across the organization.

    Business Value Driven

    Focus on generating business value from organizational investments.

    Repeatable

    Process should be standardized, transparent, and repeatable so that it can be consistently applied across the organization.

    Flexible

    Accommodate the varying needs of projects of different sizes.

    Where these pillars meet: Advocates long-term strategic vs. short-term tactical solutions.

    EA interaction points within the IT operating model

    EA’s engagement in each stage within the plan, build, and run phases should be clearly defined and communicated.

    Plan Strategy Development Business Planning Conceptualization Portfolio Management
    Build Requirements Solution Design Application Development/ Procurement Quality Assurance
    Run Deploy Operate

    Document the organization’s current IT operating model

    3.1 2-3 hr

    Input

    • IT project lifecycle

    Output

    • Organization’s current IT operating model.

    Materials

    • A computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, IT department leads, business leaders.

    Instructions:

    Hold a working session with the participants to document the current IT operating model. Facilitate the activity using the following steps:

    1. Map out the IT operating model.

    1. Find a project that was just deployed within the organization and backtrack every step of the way to the strategy development that resulted in the conception of the project.
    2. Interview the personnel involved with each step of the process to get a sense of whether or not projects usually move to deployment going through these steps.
    3. Review Info-Tech’s best-practice IT operating model presented in the EA Engagement Model Template, and add or remove any steps to the existing organization’s IT operating model as necessary. Document the finalized steps of the IT operating model.

    2. Determine EA’s current role in the operating model.

    1. Interview EA personnel through each step of the process and ask them their role. This is to get a sense of the type of input that EA is having into each step of the process.
    2. Using the EA Engagement Model Template, document the current role of EA in each step of the organization’s IT operation as you complete the interviews.

    Download the EA Engagement Model Template to document the organization’s current IT operating model.

    Define RACI in every stage of the IT operating model (e.g. EA role in strategy development phase of the IT operating model is presented below)

    Strategy Development

    Also known as strategic planning, strategy development is fundamental to creating and running a business. It involves the creation of a longer-term game plan or vision that sets specific goals and objectives for a business.

    R Those in charge of performing the task. These are the people actively involved in the completion of the required work. Business VPs, EA, IT directors R
    A The one ultimately answerable for the correct and thorough completion of the deliverable or task, and the one who delegates the work to those responsible. CEO A
    C Those whose opinions are sought before a decision is made, and with whom there is two-way communication. PMO, Line managers, etc. C
    I Those who are kept up to date on progress, and with whom there is one-way communication. Development managers, etc. I

    Next Step: Similarly define the RACI for each stage of the IT operating model; refer to the activity slide for prompts.

    Best practices on the role of EA within the IT operating model

    Plan

    Strategy Development

    C

    Business Planning

    C

    Conceptualization

    A

    Portfolio Management

    C

    Build

    Requirements

    C

    Solution Design

    R

    Application Development/ Procurement

    R

    Quality Assurance

    I

    Run

    Deploy

    I

    Operate

    I

    Next Step: Define the role of EA in each stage of the IT operating model; refer to the activity slide for prompts.

    Define EA’s target role in each step of the IT operating model

    3.2 2 hrs

    Input

    • Organization’s IT operating model.

    Output

    • Organization’s EA engagement model.

    Materials

    • A computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, CIO, business leaders, IT department leaders.

    The image shows the Table of Contents for the EA Engagement Model Template with the EA Engagement Summary section highlighted.

    Step 1 - Facilitate

    Download the EA Engagement Model Template and hold a working session to define EA’s target role in each step of the IT operating model.

    Download the EA Engagement Model Template

    Step 2 - Summarize

    Document the target state role of EA within the EA Governance Framework document.

    Update the EA Governance Framework Template


    Design an EA engagement model to formalize EA’s role within the IT operating model

    CASE STUDY

    Industry Insurance

    Source Info-Tech

    Situation

    INSPRO01 had a high IT cost structure with looming technology debt due to a preference for short-term tactical gains over long-term solutions.

    The business satisfaction with IT was at an all-time low due to expensive solutions that did not meet business needs.

    INSPRO01’s technology landscape was in disarray with many overlapping systems and interoperability issues.

    Complication

    No single team within the organization had an end-to-end perspective all the way from strategy to project execution. A lot of information was being lost in handoffs between different teams.

    This led to inconsistent design/solution patterns being applied. Investment decisions had not been grounded in reality and this often led to cost overruns.

    Result

    Info-Tech helped INSPRO01 identify opportunities for EA team engagement at different stages of the IT operating model. EA’s role within each stage was clearly defined and documented.

    With Info-Tech’s help, the EA team successfully made the case for engagement upfront during strategy development rather than during project execution.

    The increased transparency enabled the EA team to ensure that investments were aligned to organizational strategic goals and objectives.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    Key Activities

    • Build the case for EA engagement.
    • Identify engagement touchpoints within the IT operating model.

    Outcomes

    • Summary of the assessment of the current EA engagement model
    • Target EA engagement model

    Phase 4

    EA Governing Bodies

    Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework

    EA Governing Bodies

    1. Current state of EA governance
    2. EA fundamentals
    3. Engagement model
    4. EA governing bodies
    5. EA policy
    6. Architectural standards
    7. Communication Plan

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify the number of governing bodies
    • Define the game plan to initialize the governing bodies
    • Define the architecture review process

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Leaders
    • Business Leaders
    • Head of Enterprise Architecture
    • Enterprise Architects
    • Domain Architects
    • Solution Architects

    Outcomes of this step

    • Charter definition for each EA governance board

    Info-Tech Insight

    Use architecture governance like a scalpel rather than a hatchet. Implement governing bodies to provide guidance rather than act as a police force.

    Phase 4 guided implementation

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 4: Create or identify EA governing bodies

    Proposed Time to Completion: 2 weeks

    Step 4.1: Identify architecture boards and develop charters

    Start with an analyst kick-off call:

    • Understand the factors influencing the number of governing bodies required for an organization.
    • Understand the components of a governing body charter.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Identify how many governing bodies are needed.
    • Define EA governing body composition, meeting frequency, and domain of coverage.
    • Define the inputs and outputs of each EA governing body.
    • Identify mandatory inclusion criteria.

    With these tools & templates:

    • Architecture Board Charter Template

    Step 4.2: Develop an architecture review process

    Follow-up with an analyst call:

    • Review the number of boards identified for your organization and gather feedback.
    • Review the charters developed for each governing body and gather feedback.
    • Understand the various factors that impact the architecture review process.
    • Review Info-Tech’s best-practice architecture review process.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Refine the charters for governing bodies.
    • Develop the architecture review process for your organization.

    With these tools & templates:

    • Architecture Review Process Template

    Factors that determine the number of architectural boards required

    The primary purpose of architecture boards is to ensure that business benefits are maximized and solution design is within the options set forth by the architectural reference models without introducing additional layers of bureaucracy.

    The optimal number of architecture boards required in an organization is a function of the following factors:

    • EA organization model
      • Distributed
      • Federated
      • Centralized
    • Architecture domains Maturity of architecture domains
    • Project throughput

    Commonly observed architecture boards:

    • Architecture Review Board
    • Technical Architecture Committee
    • Data Architecture Review Board
    • Infrastructure Architecture Review Board
    • Security Architecture Review Board

    Info-Tech Insight

    Before building out a new governance board, start small by repurposing existing forums by adding architecture as an agenda item. As the items for review increase consider introducing dedicated governing bodies.

    EA organization model drives the architecture governance structure

    EA teams can be organized in three ways – distributed, federated, and centralized. Each model has its own strengths and weaknesses. EA governance must be structured in a way such that the strengths are harvested and the weaknesses are mitigated.

    Distributed Federated Centralized
    EA org. structure
    • No overarching EA team exists and segment architects report to line of business (LOB) executives.
    • A centralized EA team exists with segment architects reporting to LOB executives and dotted-line to head of (centralized) EA.
    • A centralized EA capability exists with enterprise architects reporting to the head of EA.
    Implications
    • Produces a fragmented and disjointed collection of architectures.
    • Economies of scale are not realized.
    • High cross-silo integration effort.
    • LOB-specific approach to EA.
    • Requires dual reporting relationships.
    • Additional effort is required to coordinate centralized EA policies and blueprints with segment EA policies and blueprints.
    • Accountabilities may be unclear.
    • Can be less responsive to individual LOB needs, because the centralized EA capability must analyze needs of multiple LOBs and various trade-off options to avoid specialized, one-off solutions.
    • May impede innovation.
    Architectural boards
    • Cross LOB working groups to create architecture standards, patterns, and common services.
    • Local boards to support responsiveness to LOB-specific needs.
    • Cross LOB working groups to create architecture standards, patterns and common services.
    • Cross-enterprise boards to ensure adherence to enterprise standards and reduce integration costs.
    • Local boards to support responsiveness to LOB specific needs.
    • Enterprise working groups to create architecture standards, patterns, and all services.
    • Central board to ensure adherence to enterprise standards.

    Architecture domains influences the number of architecture boards required

    • An architecture review board (ARB) provides direction for domain-specific boards and acts as an escalation point. The ARB must have the right mix of both business and technology stakeholders.
    • Domain-specific boards provide a platform to have focused discussions on items specific to that domain.
    • Based on project throughput and the maturity of each domain, organizations would have to pick the optimal number of boards.
    • Architecture working groups provide a platform for cross-domain conversations to establish organization wide standards.
    Level 1 Architecture Review Board IT and Business Leaders
    Level 2 Business Architecture Board Data Architecture Board Application Architecture Board Infrastructure Architecture Board Security Architecture Board IT and Business Managers
    Level 3 Architecture Working Groups Architects

    Create a game plan for the architecture boards

    • Start with a single board for each level – an architecture review board (ARB), a technical architecture committee (TAC), and architecture working groups.
    • As the organization matures and the number of requests to the TAC increase, consider creating domain-specific boards – such as business architecture, data architecture, application architecture, etc. – to handle architecture decisions pertaining to that domain.

    Start with this:

    Level 1 Architecture Review Board
    Level 2 Technical Architecture Committee
    Level 3 Architecture Working Groups

    Change to this:

    Architecture Review Board IT and Business Leaders
    Business Architecture Board Data Architecture Board Application Architecture Board Infrastructure Architecture Board Security Architecture Board IT and Business Managers
    Architecture Working Groups Architects

    Architecture boards have different objectives and activities

    The boards at each level should be set up with the correct agenda – ensure that the boards’ composition and activities reflect their objective. Use the entry criteria to communicate the agenda for their meetings.

    Architecture Review Board Technical Architecture Committee
    Objective
    • Evaluates business strategy, needs, and priorities, sets direction and acts as a decision making authority of the EA capability.
    • Directs the development of target state architecture.
    • Monitors performance and compliance of the architectural standards.
    • Monitor project solution architecture compliance to standards, regulations, EA principles, and target state EA blueprints.
    • Review EA compliance waiver requests, make recommendations, and escalate to the architecture review board (ARB).
    Composition
    • Business Leadership
    • IT Leadership
    • Head of Enterprise Architecture
    • Business Managers
    • IT Managers
    • Architects
    Activities
    • Review compliance of conceptual solution to standards.
    • Discuss the enterprise implications of the proposed solution.
    • Select and approve vendors.
    • Review detailed solution design.
    • Discuss the risks of the proposed solution.
    • Discuss the cost of the proposed solution.
    • Review and recommend vendors.
    Entry Criteria
    • Changes to IT Enterprise Technology Policy.
    • Changes to the technology management plan.
    • Approve changes to enterprise technology inventory/portfolio.
    • Ongoing operational cost impacts.
    • Detailed estimates for the solution are ready for review.
    • There are significant changes to protocols or technologies responsible for solution.
    • When the project is deviating from baselined architectures.

    Identify the number of governing bodies

    4.1 2 hrs

    Input

    • EA Vision and Mission
    • EA Engagement Model

    Output

    • A list of EA governing bodies.

    Materials

    • A computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, CIO, business line leads, IT department leads.

    Instructions:

    Hold a working session with the participants to identify the number of governing bodies. Facilitate the activity using the following steps:

    1. Examine the EA organization models mentioned previously. Assess how your organization is structured, and identify whether your organization has a federated, distributed or centralized EA organization model.
    2. Reference the “Game plan for the architecture boards” slide. Assess the architecture domains, and define how many there are in the organization.
    3. Architecture domains:
      1. If no defined architecture domains exist, model the number of governing bodies in the organization based on the “Start with this” scenario in the “Game plan for the architecture boards” slide.
      2. If defined architecture domains do exist, model the number of governing bodies based on the “Change to this” scenario in the “Game plan for the architecture boards” slide.
    4. Name each governing body you have defined in the previous step. Download Info-Tech’s Architecture Board Charter Template for each domain you have named. Input the names into the title of each downloaded template.

    Download the Architecture Board Charter Template to document this activity.

    Defining the governing body charter

    The charter represents the agreement between the governing body and its stakeholders about the value proposition and obligations to the organization.

    1. Purpose: The reason for the existence of the governing body and its goals and objectives.
    2. Composition: The members who make up the committee and their roles and responsibilities in it.
    3. Frequency of meetings: The frequency at which the committee gathers to discuss items and make decisions.
    4. Entry/Exit Criteria: The criteria by which the committee selects items for review and items for which decisions can be taken.
    5. Inputs: Materials that are provided as inputs for review and decision making by the committee.
    6. Outputs: Materials that are provided by the committee after an item has been reviewed and the decision made.
    7. Activities: Actions undertaken by the committee to arrive at its decision.

    Define EA’s target role in each step of the IT operating model

    4.2 3 hrs

    Input

    • A list of all identified EA governing bodies.

    Output

    • Charters for each EA governing bodies.

    Materials

    • A computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, business line leads, IT department leads.

    The image shows the Table of Contents for the EA Governance Framework document, with the Architecture Board Charters highlighted.

    Step 1 Facilitate

    Hold a working session with the stakeholders to define the charter for each of the identified architecture boards.

    Download Architecture Board Charter Template

    Step 2 Summarize

    • Summarize the objectives of each board and reference the charter document within the EA Governance Framework.
    • Upload the final charter document to the team’s common repository.

    Update the EA Governance Framework document


    Considerations when creating an architecture review process

    • Ensure that architecture review happens at major milestones within the organization’s IT Operating Model such as the plan, build, and run phases.
    • In order to provide continuous engagement, make the EA group accountable for solution architecture in the plan phase. In the build phase, the EA group will be consulted while the solution architect will be responsible for the project solution architecture.

    Plan

    • Strategy Development
    • Business Planning
    • A - Conceptualization
    • Portfolio Management

    Build

    • Requirements
    • R - Solution Design
    • Application Development/ Procurement
    • Quality Assurance

    Run

    • Deploy
    • Operate

    Best-practice project architecture review process

    The best-practice model presented facilitates the creation of sound solution architecture through continuous engagement with the EA team and well-defined governance checkpoints.

    The image shows a graphic of the best-practice model. At the left, four categories are listed: Committees; EA; Project Team; LOB. At the top, three categories are listed: Plan; Build; Run. Within the area between these categories is a flow chart demonstrating the best-practice model and specific checkpoints throughout.

    Develop the architecture review process

    4.3 2 hours

    Input

    • A list of all EA governing bodies.
    • Info-Tech’s best practice architecture review process.

    Output

    • The new architecture review process.

    Materials

    • A computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, business line leads, IT department leads.

    Hold a working session with the participants to develop the architecture review process. Facilitate the activity using the following steps:

    1. Reference Info-Tech’s best-practice architecture review process embedded within the “Architecture Review Process Template” to gain an understanding of an ideal architecture review process.
    2. Identify the stages within the plan, build, and run phases where solution architecture reviews should occur, and identify the governing bodies involved in these reviews.
    3. As you go through these stages, record your findings in the Architecture Review Process Template.
    4. Connect the various activities leading to and from the architecture creation points to outline the review process.

    Download the Architecture Review Process Template for additional guidance regarding developing an architecture review process.

    Develop the architecture review process

    4.3 2 hrs

    Input

    • A list of all identified EA governing bodies.

    Output

    • Charters for each EA governing bodies.

    Materials

    • A computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, business line leads, IT department leads.

    The image shows a screenshot of the Table of Contents, with the Architecture Review Process highlighted.

    Step 1 - Facilitate

    Download Architecture Review Process Template and facilitate a session to customize the best-practice model presented in the template.

    Download the Architecture Review Process Template

    Step 2 - Summarize

    Summarize the process changes and document the process flow in the EA Governance Framework document.

    Update the EA Governance Framework Template

    Right-size EA governing bodies to reduce the perception of red tape

    Case Study

    Industry Insurance

    Source Info-Tech

    Situation

    At INSPRO01, architecture governance boards were a bottleneck. The boards fielded all project requests, ranging from simple screen label changes to complex initiatives spanning multiple applications.

    These boards were designed as forums for technology discussions without any business stakeholder involvement.

    Complication

    INSPRO01’s management never gave buy-in to the architecture governance boards since their value was uncertain.

    Additionally, architectural reviews were perceived as an item to be checked off rather than a forum for getting feedback.

    Architectural exceptions were not being followed through due to the lack of a dispensation process.

    Result

    Info-Tech has helped the team define adaptable inclusion/exclusion criteria (based on project complexity) for each of the architectural governing boards.

    The EA team was able to make the case for business participation in the architecture forums to better align business and technology investment.

    An architecture dispensation process was created and operationalized. As a result architecture reviews became more transparent with well-defined next steps.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    Key Activities

    • Identify the number of governing bodies.
    • Define the game plan to initialize the governing bodies.
    • Define the architecture review process.

    Outcomes

    • Charter definition for each EA governance board

    Phase 5

    EA Policy

    Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework

    EA Policy

    1. Current state of EA governance
    2. EA fundamentals
    3. Engagement model
    4. EA governing bodies
    5. EA policy
    6. Architectural standards
    7. Communication Plan

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Define the EA policy scope
    • Identify the target audience
    • Determine the inclusion and exclusion criteria
    • Create an assessment checklist

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Leaders
    • Business Leaders
    • Head of Enterprise Architecture
    • Enterprise Architects
    • Domain Architects
    • Solution Architects

    Outcomes of this step

    • The completed EA policy
    • Project assessment checklist
    • Defined assessment outcomes
    • Completed compliance waiver process

    Info-Tech Insight

    Use the EA policy to promote EA’s commitment to deliver value to business stakeholders through process transparency, stakeholder engagement, and compliance.

    Phase 5 guided implementation

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 5: EA Policy

    Proposed Time to Completion: 3 weeks

    Step 5.1–5.3: EA Policy, Assessment Checklists, and Decision Types

    Start with an analyst kick-off call:

    • Discuss the three pillars of EA policy and its purpose.
    • Review the components of an effective EA policy.
    • Understand how to develop architecture assessment checklists.
    • Understand the assessment decision types.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Define purpose, scope, and audience of the EA policy.
    • Create a project assessment checklist.
    • Define the organization’s assessment decision type.

    With these tools & templates:

    • EA Policy Template
    • EA Assessment Checklist Template

    Step 5.4: Compliance Waivers

    Review findings with analyst:

    • Review your draft EA policy and gather feedback.
    • Review your project assessment checklists and the assessment decision types.
    • Discuss the best-practice architecture compliance waiver process and how to tailor it to your organizational needs.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Refine the EA policy based on feedback gathered.
    • Create the compliance waiver process.

    With these tools & templates:

    • EA Compliance Waiver Process Template
    • EA Compliance Waiver Form Template

    Three pillars of architecture policy

    Architecture policy is a set of guidelines, formulated and enforced by the governing bodies of an organization, to guide and constrain architectural choices in pursuit of strategic goals.

    Architecture compliance – promotes compliance to organizational standards through well-defined assessment checklists across architectural domains.

    Business value – ensures that investments are tied to business value by enforcing traceability to business capabilities.

    Architectural guidance – provides guidance to architecture practitioners on the application of the business and technology standards.

    Components of EA policy

    An enterprise architecture policy is an actionable document that can be applied to projects of varying complexity across the organization.

    1. Purpose and Scope: This EA policy document clearly defines the scope and the objectives of architecture reviews within an organization.
    2. Target Audience: The intended audience of the policy such as employees and partners.
    3. Architecture Assessment Checklist: A wide range of typical questions that may be used in conducting Architecture Compliance reviews, relating to various aspects of the architecture.
    4. Assessment Outcomes: The outcome of the architecture review process that determines the conformance of a project solution to the enterprise architecture standards.
    5. Compliance Waiver: Used when a solution or segment architecture is perceived to be non-compliant with the enterprise architecture.

    Draft the purpose and scope of the EA policy

    5.1 2.5 hrs

    Input

    • A consensus on the purpose, scope, and audience for the EA policy.

    Output

    • Documented version of the purpose, scope, and audience for the EA policy.

    Materials

    • A computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, CIO, business line leads, IT department leads.

    The image shows a screenshot of the Table of Contents with the EA Policy section highlighted.

    Step 1 - Facilitate

    Download the EA Policy Template and hold a working session to draft the EA policy.

    Download the EA Policy Template

    Step 2 - Summarize

    • Summarize purpose, scope, and intended audience of the policy in the EA Governance Framework document.
    • Update the EA policy document with the purpose, scope and intended audience.

    Update the EA Governance Framework Template

    Architecture assessment checklist

    Architecture assessment checklist is a list of future-looking criteria that a project will be assessed against. It provides a set of standards against which projects can be assessed in order to render a decision on whether or not the project can be greenlighted.

    Architecture checklists should be created for each EA domain since each domain provides guidance on specific aspects of the project.

    Sample Checklist Questions

    Business Architecture:

    • Is the project aligned to organizational strategic goals and objectives?
    • What are the business capabilities that the project supports? Is it creating new capabilities or supporting an existing one?

    Data Architecture:

    • What processes are in place to support data referential integrity and/or normalization?
    • What is the physical data model definition (derived from logical data models) used to design the database?

    Application Architecture:

    • Can this application be placed on an application server independent of all other applications? If not, explain the dependencies.
    • Can additional parallel application servers be easily added? If so, what is the load balancing mechanism?

    Infrastructure Architecture:

    • Does the solution provide high-availability and fault-tolerance that can recover from events within a datacenter?

    Security Architecture:

    • Have you ensured that the corporate security policies and guidelines to which you are designing are the latest versions?

    Create architectural assessment checklists

    5.2 2 hrs

    Input

    • Reference architecture models.

    Output

    • Architecture assessment checklist.

    Materials

    • A computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, business line leads, IT department leads.

    The image shows a screenshot of the Table of Contents with the EA Assessment Checklist section highlighted.

    Step 1 - Facilitate

    Download the EA Assessment Checklist Template and hold a working session to create the architectural assessment checklists.

    Download the EA Assessment Checklist Template

    Step 2 - Summarize

    • Summarize the major points of the checklists in the EA Governance Framework document.
    • Update the EA policy document with the detailed architecture assessment checklists.

    Update the EA Governance Framework Template

    Architecture assessment decision types

    • As a part of the proposed solution review, the governing bodies produce a decision indicating the compliance of the solution architecture with the enterprise standards.
    • Go, No Go, or Conditional are a sample set of decision outcomes available to the governing bodies.
    • On a conditional approval, the project team must file for a compliance waiver.

    Approved

    • The solution demonstrates substantial compliance with standards.
    • Negligible risk to the organization or minimal risks with sound plans of how to mitigate them.
    • Architectural approval to proceed with delivery type of work.

    Conditional Approval

    • The significant aspects of the solution have been addressed in a satisfactory manner.
    • Yet, there are some aspects of the solution that are not compliant with standards.
    • The architectural approval is conditional upon presenting the missing evidence within a minimal period of time determined.
    • The risk level may be acceptable to the organization from an overall IT governance perspective.

    Not Approved

    • The solution is not compliant with the standards.
    • Scheduled for a follow-up review.
    • Not recommended to proceed until the solution is more compliant with the standards.

    Best-practice architecture compliance waiver process

    Waivers are not permanent. Waiver terms must be documented for each waiver specifying:

    • Time period after which the architecture in question will be compliant with the enterprise architecture.
    • The modifications necessary to the enterprise architecture to accommodate the solution.

    The image shows a flow chart, split into 4 sections: Enterprise Architect; Solution Architect; TAC; ARB. To the right of these section labels, there is a flow chart that documents the waiver process.

    Create compliance waiver process

    5.4 3-4 hrs

    Input

    • A consensus on the compliance waiver process.

    Output

    • Documented compliance waiver process and form.

    Materials

    • A computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, business line leads, IT department leads.

    The image shows the Table of Contents with the Compliance Waiver Form section highlighted.

    Step 1 - Facilitate

    Download the EA compliance waiver template and hold a working session to customize the best-practice process to your organization’s needs.

    Download the EA Compliance Waiver Process Template

    Step 2 - Summarize

    • Summarize the objectives and high-level process in the EA Governance Framework document.
    • Update the EA policy document with the compliance waiver process.
    • Upload the final policy document to the team’s common repository.

    Update the EA Governance Framework Template

    Creates an enterprise architecture policy to drive adoption

    Case Study

    Industry Insurance

    Source Info-Tech

    Situation

    EA program adoption across INSPRO01 was at its lowest point due to a lack of transparency into the activities performed by the EA group.

    Often, projects ignored EA entirely as it was viewed as a nebulous and non-value-added activity that produced no measurable results.

    Complication

    There was very little documented information about the architecture assessment process and the standards against which project solution architectures were evaluated.

    Additionally, there were no well-defined outcomes for the assessment.

    Project groups were left speculating about the next steps and with little guidance on what to do after completing an assessment.

    Result

    Info-Tech helped the EA team create an EA policy containing architecture significance criteria, assessment checklists, and reference to the architecture review process.

    Additionally, the team also identified guidelines and detailed next steps for projects based on the outcome of the architecture assessment.

    These actions brought clarity to EA processes and fostered better engagement with the EA group.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    Key Activities

    • Define the scope.
    • Identify the target audience.
    • Determine the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
    • Create an assessment checklist.

    Outcomes

    • The completed EA policy
    • Project assessment checklist
    • Defined assessment outcomes
    • Completed compliance waiver process

    Phase 6

    Architectural Standards

    Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework

    Architectural Standards

    1. Current state of EA governance
    2. EA fundamentals
    3. Engagement model
    4. EA governing bodies
    5. EA policy
    6. Architectural standards
    7. Communication Plan

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify and standardize EA work products
    • Classify the architectural standards
    • Identify the custodian of standards
    • Update the standards

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Head of Enterprise Architecture
    • Enterprise Architects
    • Domain Architects
    • Solution Architects

    Outcomes of this step

    • A standardized set of EA work products
    • A way to categorize and store EA work products
    • A defined method of updating standards

    Info-Tech Insight

    The architecture standard is the currency that facilitates information exchange between stakeholders. The primary purpose is to minimize transaction costs by providing a balance between stability and relevancy.

    Phase 6 guided implementation

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 6: Architectural standards

    Proposed Time to Completion: 4 weeks

    Step 6.1: Understand Architectural Standards

    Start with an analyst kick-off call:

    • Discuss architectural standards.
    • Know how to identify and define EA work products.
    • Understand the standard content of work products.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Identify and standardize EA work products.

    Step 6.2–6.3: EA Repository and Updating the Standards

    Review with analyst:

    • Review the standardized EA work products.
    • Discuss the principles of EA repository.
    • Discuss the Info-Tech best-practice model for updating architecture standards and how to tailor them to your organizational context.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Build a folder structure for storing EA work products.
    • Use the Info-Tech best-practice architecture standards update process to develop your organization’s process for updating architecture standards.

    With these tools & templates:

    • Architecture Standards Update Process Template

    Recommended list of EA work products to standardize

    • EA work products listed below are typically produced as a part of the architecture lifecycle.
    • To ensure consistent development of architecture, the work products need to be standardized.
    • Consider standardizing both the naming conventions and the content of the work products.
    1. EA vision: A document containing the vision that provides the high-level aspiration of the capabilities and business value that EA will deliver.
    2. Statement of EA Work: The Statement of Architecture Work defines the scope and approach that will be used to complete an architecture project.
    3. Reference architectures: A reference architecture is a set of best-practice taxonomy that describes components and the conceptual structure of the model, as well as graphics, which provide a visual representation of the taxonomy to aid understanding. Reference architectures are created for each of the architecture domains.
    4. Solution proposal: The proposed project solution based on the EA guidelines and standards.
    5. Compliance assessment request: The document that contains the project solution architecture assessment details.
    6. Architecture change request: The request that initiates a change to architecture standards when existing standards can no longer meet the needs of the enterprise.
    7. Transition architecture: A transition architecture shows the enterprise at incremental states that reflect periods of transition that sit between the baseline and target architectures.
    8. Architectural roadmap: A roadmap that lists individual increments of change and lays them out on a timeline to show progression from the baseline architecture to the target architecture.
    9. EA compliance waiver request: A compliance waiver request that must be made when a solution or segment architecture is perceived to be non-compliant with the enterprise architecture.

    Standardize the content of each work product

    1. Purpose - The reason for the existence of the work product.
    2. Owner - The owner of this EA work product.
    3. Target Audience - The intended audience of the work product such as employees and partners.
    4. Naming Pattern - The pattern for the name of the work product as well as its file name.
    5. Table of Contents - The various sections of the work product.
    6. Review & Sign-Off Authority - The stakeholders who will review the work product and approve it.
    7. Repository Folder Location - The location where the work product will be stored.

    Identify and standardize work products

    6.1 3 hrs

    Input

    • List of various documents being produced by projects currently.

    Output

    • Standardized list of work products.

    Materials

    • A computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • A computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Instructions:

    Hold a working session with the participants to identify and standardize work products. Facilitate the activity using the steps below.

    1. Identifying EA work products:
      1. Start by reviewing the list of all architecture-related documents presently produced in the organization. Any such deliverable with the following characteristics can be standardized:
        1. If it can be broken out and made into a standalone document.
        2. If it can be made into a fill-in form completed by others.
        3. If it is repetitive and requires iterative changes.
      2. Create a list of work products that your organization would like to standardize based on the characteristics above.
    2. The content and format of standardized EA work products:
      1. For each work product your organization wishes to standardize, look at its purpose and brainstorm the content needed to fulfill that purpose.
      2. After identifying the elements that need to be included in the work product to fulfill its purpose, order them logically for presentation purposes.
      3. In each section of the work product that need to be completed, include instructions on how to complete the section.
      4. Review the seven elements presented in the previous slide and include them in the work products.

    EA repository - information taxonomy

    As the EA function begins to grow and accumulates EA work products, having a well-designed folder structure helps you find the necessary information efficiently.

    Architecture meta-model

    Describes the organizationally tailored architecture framework.

    Architecture capability

    Defines the parameters, structures, and processes that support the enterprise architecture group.

    Architecture landscape

    An architectural presentation of assets in use by the enterprise at particular points in time.

    Standards information base

    Captures the standards with which new architectures and deployed services must comply.

    Reference library

    Provides guidelines, templates, patterns, and other forms of reference material to accelerate the creation of new architectures for the enterprise.

    Governance log

    Provides a record of governance activity across the enterprise.

    Create repository folder structure

    6.2 5-6 hrs

    Input

    • List of standardized work products.

    Output

    • EA work products mapped to a repository folder.

    Materials

    • A computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, IT department leads.

    Instructions:

    Hold a working session with the participants to create a repository structure. Facilitate the activity using the steps below:

    1. Start with the taxonomy on the previous slide, and sort the existing work products into these six categories.
    2. Assess that the work products are sorted in a mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive fashion. This means that a certain work product that appears in one category should not appear in another category. As well, make sure these six categories capture all the existing work products.
    3. Based on the categorization of the work products, build a folder structure that follows these categories, which will allow for the work products to be accessed quickly and easily.

    Create a process to update EA work products

    • Architectural standards are not set in stone and should be reviewed and updated periodically.
    • The Architecture Review Board is the custodian for standards.
    • Any change to the standards need to be assessed thoroughly and must be communicated to all the impacted stakeholders.

    Architectural standards update process

    Identify

    • Identify changes to the standards

    Assess

    • Review and assess the impacts of the change

    Document

    • Document the change and update the standard

    Approve

    • Distribute the updated standards to key stakeholders for approval

    Communicate

    • Communicate the approved changes to impacted stakeholders

    Create a process to continually update standards

    6.3 1.5 hrs

    Input

    • The list of work products and its owners.

    Output

    • A documented work product update process.

    Materials

    • A computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, business line leads, IT department leads.

    The image shows the screenshot of the Table of Contents with the Standards Update Process highlighted.

    Step 1 - Facilitate

    Download the standards update process template and hold a working session to customize the best practice process to your organization’s needs.

    Download the Architecture Standards Update Process Template

    Step 2 - Summarize

    Summarize the objectives and the process flow in the EA governance framework document.

    Update the EA Governance Framework Template

    Create architectural standards to minimize transaction costs

    Case Study

    Industry Insurance

    Source Info-Tech

    Situation

    INSPRO01 didn’t maintain any centralized standards and each project had its own solution/design work products based on the preference of the architect on the project. This led to multiple standards across the organization.

    Lack of consistency in architectural deliverables made the information hand-offs expensive.

    Complication

    INSPRO01 didn’t maintain the architectural documents in a central repository and the information was scattered across multiple project folders.

    This caused key stakeholders to make decisions based on incomplete information and resulted in constant revisions as new information became available.

    Result

    Info-Tech recommended that the EA team identify and standardize the various EA work products so that information was collected in a consistent manner across the organization.

    The team also recommended an information taxonomy to store the architectural deliverables and other collateral.

    This resulted in increased consistency and standardization leading to efficiency gains.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    Key Activities

    • Identify and standardize EA work products.
    • Classify the architectural standards.
    • Identify the custodian of standards.
    • Update the standards.

    Outcomes

    • A standardized set of EA work products
    • A way to categorize and store EA work products
    • A defined method of updating standards

    Phase 7

    Communication Plan

    Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework

    Communication Plan

    1. Current state of EA governance
    2. EA fundamentals
    3. Engagement model
    4. EA governing bodies
    5. EA policy
    6. Architectural standards
    7. Communication Plan

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • List the changes identified in the EA governance initiative
    • Identify stakeholders
    • Create a communication plan

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Head of Enterprise Architecture
    • Enterprise Architects
    • Domain Architects
    • Solution Architects

    Outcomes of this step

    • Communication Plan
    • EA Governance Framework

    Info-Tech Insight

    By failing to prepare, you are preparing to fail – maximize the likelihood of success for EA governance by engaging the relevant stakeholders and communicating the changes.

    Phase 7 guided implementation

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 6: Operationalize the EA governance framework

    Proposed Time to Completion: 1 week

    Step 7.1: Create a Communication Plan

    Start with an analyst kick-off call:

    • Discuss how to communicate changes to stakeholders.
    • Discuss the purposes and benefits of the EA governance framework.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Identify the stakeholders affected by the EA governance transformations.
    • List the benefits of the proposed EA governance initiative.
    • Create a plan to communicate the changes to impacted stakeholders.

    With these tools & templates:

    • EA Governance Communication Plan Template
    • EA Governance Framework Template

    Step 7.2: Review the Communication Plan

    Start with an analyst kick-off call:

    • Review the communication plan and gather feedback on the proposed stakeholders.
    • Confer about the various methods of communicating change in an organization.
    • Discuss the uses of the EA Governance Framework.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Refine your communication plan and use it to engage with stakeholders to better serve customers.
    • Create the EA Governance Framework to accompany the communication plan in engaging stakeholders to better understand the value of EA.

    With these tools & templates:

    • EA Governance Communication Plan Template
    • EA Governance Framework Template

    Communicate changes to stakeholders

    The changes made to the EA governance components need to be reviewed, approved, and communicated to all of the impacted stakeholders.

    Deliverables to be reviewed:

    • Fundamentals
      • Vision and Mission
      • Goals and Measures
      • Principles
    • Architecture review process
    • Assessment checklists
    • Policy Governing body charters
    • Architectural standards

    Deliverable Review Process:

    Step 1: Hold a meeting with stakeholders to review, refine, and agree on the changes.

    Step 2: Obtain an official approval from the stakeholders.

    Step 3: Communicate the changes to the impacted stakeholders.

    Communicate the changes by creating an EA governance framework and communication plan

    7.1 3 hrs

    Input

    • EA governance deliverables.

    Output

    • EA Governance Framework
    • Communication Plan.

    Materials

    • A computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, CIO, business line leads, IT department leads.

    Instructions:

    Hold a working session with the participants to create the EA governance framework as well as the communication plan. Facilitate the activity using the steps below:

    1. EA Governance Framework:
      1. The EA Governance Framework is a document that will help reference and cite all the materials created from this blueprint. Follow the instructions on the framework to complete.
    2. Communication Plan:
      1. Identify the stakeholders based on the EA governance deliverables.
      2. For each stakeholder identified, complete the “Communication Matrix” section in the EA Governance Communication Plan Template. Fill out the section based on the instructions in the template.
      3. As the stakeholders are identified based on the “Communication Matrix,” use the EA Governance Framework document to communicate the changes.

    Download the EA Governance Communication Plan Template and EA Governance Framework Template for additional instructions and to document your activities in this phase.

    Maximize the likelihood of success by communicating changes

    Case Study

    Industry Insurance

    Source Info-Tech

    Situation

    The EA group followed Info-Tech’s methodology to assess the current state and has identified areas for improvement.

    Best practices were adopted to fill the gaps identified.

    The team planned to communicate the changes to the technology leadership team and get approvals.

    As the EA team tried to roll out changes, they encountered resistance from various IT teams.

    Complication

    The team was not sure of how to communicate the changes to the business stakeholders.

    Result

    Info-Tech has helped the team conduct a thorough stakeholder analysis to identify all the stakeholders who would be impacted by the changes to the architecture governance framework.

    A comprehensive communication plan was developed that leveraged traditional email blasts, town hall meetings, and non-traditional methods such as team blogs.

    The team executed the communication plan and was able to manage the change effectively.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    Key Activities

    • List the changes identified in the EA governance initiative.
    • Identify stakeholders.
    • Create a communication plan.
    • Compile the materials created in the blueprint to better communicate the value of EA governance.

    Outcomes

    • Communication plan
    • EA governance framework

    Bibliography

    Government of British Columbia. “Architecture and Standards Review Board.” Government of British Columbia. 2015. Web. Jan 2016. < http://www.cio.gov.bc.ca/cio/standards/asrb.page >

    Hopkins, Brian. “The Essential EA Toolkit Part 3 – An Architecture Governance Process.” Cio.com. Oct 2010. Web. April 2016. < http://www.cio.com/article/2372450/enterprise-architecture/the-essential-ea-toolkit-part-3---an-architecture-governance-process.html >

    Kantor, Bill. “How to Design a Successful RACI Project Plan.” CIO.com. May 2012. Web. Jan 2016. < http://www.cio.com/article/2395825/project-management/how-to-design-a-successful-raci-project-plan.html >

    Sapient. “MIT Enterprise Architecture Guide.” Sapient. Sep 2004. Web. Jan 2016. < http://web.mit.edu/itag/eag/FullEnterpriseArchitectureGuide0.1.pdf >

    TOGAF. “Chapter 41: Architecture Repository.” The Open Group. 2011. Web. Jan 2016. < http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/chap41.html >

    TOGAF. “Chapter 48: Architecture Compliance.” The Open Group. 2011. Web. Jan 2016. < http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/chap48.html >

    TOGAF. “Version 9.1.” The Open Group. 2011. Web. Jan 2016. http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/

    United States Secret Service. “Enterprise Architecture Review Board.” United States Secret Service. Web. Jan 2016. < http://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/toolkit/pdf/ID191.pdf >

    Virginia Information Technologies Agency. “Enterprise Architecture Policy.” Commonwealth of Virginia. Jul 2006. Web. Jan 2016. < https://www.vita.virginia.gov/uploadedfiles/vita_main_public/library/eapolicy200-00.pdf >

    Research contributors and experts

    Alan Mitchell, Senior Manager, Global Cities Centre of Excellence, KPMG

    Alan Mitchell has held numerous consulting positions before his role in Global Cities Centre of Excellence for KPMG. As a Consultant, he has had over 10 years of experience working with enterprise architecture related engagements. Further, he worked extensively with the public sector and prides himself on his knowledge of governance and how governance can generate value for an organization.

    Ian Gilmour, Associate Partner, EA advisory services, KPMG

    Ian Gilmour is the global lead for KPMG’s enterprise architecture method and Chief Architect for the KPMG Enterprise Reference Architecture for Health and Human Services. He has over 20 years of business design experience using enterprise architecture techniques. The key service areas that Ian focuses on are business architecture, IT-enabled business transformation, application portfolio rationalization, and the development of an enterprise architecture capability within client organizations.

    Djamel Djemaoun Hamidson, Senior Enterprise Architect, CBC/Radio-Canada

    Djamel Djemaoun is the Senior Enterprise Architect for CBC/Radio-Canada. He has over 15 years of Enterprise Architecture experience. Djamel’s areas of special include service-oriented architecture, enterprise architecture integration, business process management, business analytics, data modeling and analysis, and security and risk management.

    Sterling Bjorndahl, Director of Operations, eHealth Saskatchewan

    Sterling Bjorndahl is now the Action CIO for the Sun Country Regional Health Authority, and also assisting eHealth Saskatchewan grow its customer relationship management program. Sterling’s areas of expertise include IT strategy, enterprise architecture, ITIL, and business process management. He serves as the Chair on the Board of Directors for Gardiner Park Child Care.

    Huw Morgan, IT Research Executive, Enterprise Architect

    Huw Morgan has 10+ years experience as a Vice President or Chief Technology Officer in Canadian internet companies. As well, he possesses 20+ years experience in general IT management. Huw’s areas of expertise include enterprise architecture, integration, e-commerce, and business intelligence.

    Serge Parisien, Manager, Enterprise Architecture at Canada Mortgage Housing Corporation

    Serge Parisien is a seasoned IT leader with over 25 years of experience in the field of information technology governance and systems development in both the private and public sectors. His areas of expertise include enterprise architecture, strategy, and project management.

    Alex Coleman, Chief Information Officer at Saskatchewan Workers’ Compensation Board

    Alex Coleman is a strategic, innovative, and results-driven business leader with a proven track record of 20+ years’ experience planning, developing, and implementing global business and technology solutions across multiple industries in the private, public, and not-for-profit sectors. Alex’s expertise includes program management, integration, and project management.

    L.C. (Skip) Lumley , Student of Enterprise and Business Architecture

    Skip Lumley was formerly a Senior Principle at KPMG Canada. He is now post-career and spends his time helping move enterprise business architecture practices forward. His areas of expertise include enterprise architecture program implementation and public sector enterprise architecture business development.

    Additional contributors

    • Tim Gangwish, Enterprise Architect at Elavon
    • Darryl Garmon, Senior Vice President at Elavon
    • Steve Ranaghan, EMEIA business engagement at Fujitsu

    Implement Your Negotiation Strategy More Effectively

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}225|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Vendor Management
    • Parent Category Link: /vendor-management
    • Forty-eight percent of CIOs believe their budgets are inadequate.
    • CIOs and IT departments are getting more involved with negotiations to reduce costs and risk.
    • Not all negotiators are created equal, and the gap between a skilled negotiator and an average negotiator is not always easy to identify objectively.
    • Skilled negotiators are in short supply.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Preparation is critical for the success of your negotiation, but you cannot prepare for every eventuality.
    • Communication is the heart and soul of negotiations, but what is being “said” is only part of the picture.
    • Skilled negotiators separate themselves based on skillsets, and outcomes alone may not provide an accurate assessment of a negotiator.

    Impact and Result

    Addressing and managing critical negotiation elements helps:

    • Improve negotiation skills.
    • Implement your negotiation strategy more effectively.
    • Improve negotiation results.

    Implement Your Negotiation Strategy More Effectively Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should create and follow a scalable process for preparing to negotiate with vendors, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. During

    Throughout this phase, ten essential negotiation elements are identified and reviewed.

    • Implement Your Negotiation Strategy More Effectively – Phase 1: During
    • During Negotiations Tool
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Implement Your Negotiation Strategy More Effectively

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 12 Steps to Better Negotiation Preparation

    The Purpose

    Improve negotiation skills and outcomes.

    Understand how to use the Info-Tech During Negotiations Tool.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A better understanding of the subtleties of the negotiation process and an identification of where the negotiation strategy can go awry.

    The During Negotiation Tool will be reviewed and configured for the customer’s environment (as applicable).

    Activities

    1.1 Manage six key items during the negotiation process.

    1.2 Set the right tone and environment for the negotiation.

    1.3 Focus on improving three categories of intangibles.

    1.4 Improve communication skills to improve negotiation skills.

    1.5 Customize your negotiation approach to interact with different personality traits and styles.

    1.6 Maximize the value of your discussions by focusing on seven components.

    1.7 Understand the value of impasses and deadlocks and how to work through them.

    1.8 Use concessions as part of your negotiation strategy.

    1.9 Identify and defeat common vendor negotiation ploys.

    1.10 Review progress and determine next steps.

    Outputs

    Sample negotiation ground rules

    Sample vendor negotiation ploys

    Sample discussion questions and evaluation matrix

    Cost-Optimize Your Security Budget

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}250|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $2,078 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 2 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Security Strategy & Budgeting
    • Parent Category Link: /security-strategy-and-budgeting
    • The security budget has been slashed and the team needs to do more with less.
    • Mitigating risk is still the top priority, only now we need to reassess effectiveness and efficiency to ensure we are getting the greatest level of protection for the least amount of money.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    A cost-optimized security budget is one that has the greatest impact on risk for the least amount of money spent.

    Impact and Result

    • Focus on business needs and related risks. Review the risk-reduction efficacy of your people, processes, and technology and justify what can be cut and what must stay.
    • Info-Tech will guide you through this process, and by the end of this blueprint you will have a cost-optimized security budget and an executive presentation to explain your revised spending.

    Cost-Optimize Your Security Budget Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should cost-optimize your security budget, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Cost-optimize your technology and managed services

    This phase will help you assess the efficacy of your current technology and service providers.

    • Threat and Risk Assessment Tool
    • In-House vs. Outsourcing Decision-Making Tool

    2. Cost-optimize your staffing

    This phase will help you assess if layoffs are necessary.

    • Security Employee Layoff Selection Tool

    3. Cost-optimize your security strategy

    This phase will help you revise the pending process-based initiatives in your security strategy.

    • Security Cost Optimization Workbook
    • Security Cost Optimization Executive Presentation
    [infographic]

    Select an EA Tool Based on Business and User Need

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}274|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $62,999 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 18 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Architecture Domains
    • Parent Category Link: /architecture-domains
    • A mature EA function is increasingly becoming an organizational priority to drive innovation, provide insight, and define digital capabilities.
    • Proliferation of digital technology has increased complexity, straining the EA function to deliver insights.
    • An EA tool increases the efficiency with which the EA function can deliver insights, but a large number of organizations have not a selected an EA tool that suits their needs.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • EA tool value largely comes from tying organizational context and requirements to the selection process.
    • Organizations that have selected an EA tool often fail to have it adopted and show its true value. To ensure successful adoption and value delivery, the EA tool selection process must account for the needs of business stakeholders and tool users.

    Impact and Result

    • Link the need for the EA tool to your organization’s EA value proposition. The connection enables the EA tool to address the future needs of stakeholders and the design style of the EA team.
    • Use Info-Tech’s EA Solution Recommendation Tool to create a shortlist of EA tools that is suited to the preferences of the organization.
    • Gather additional information on the shortlist of EA tool vendors to narrow down the selection using the EA Tool Request for Information Template.

    Select an EA Tool Based on Business and User Need Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should procure an EA tool in the digital age, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    • Select an EA Tool Based on Business and User Need – Executive Brief
    • Select an EA Tool Based on Business and User Need – Phases 1-3

    1. Make the case

    Decide if an EA tool is needed in your organization and define the requirements of EA tool users.

    • Select an EA Tool Based on Business and User Need – Phase 1: Make the Case
    • EA Value Proposition Template
    • EA Tool User Requirements Template

    2. Shortlist EA tools

    Determine your organization’s preferences in terms of product capabilities and vendor characteristics.

    • Select an EA Tool Based on Business and User Need – Phase 2: Shortlist EA Tools
    • EA Solution Recommendation Tool

    3. Select and communicate the process

    Gather information on shortlisted vendors and make your final decision.

    • Select an EA Tool Based on Business and User Need – Phase 3: Select and Communicate the Process
    • EA Tool Request for Information Template
    • EA Tool Demo Script Template
    • Request for Proposal (RFP) Template
    • EA Tool Selection Process Template
    [infographic]

    Secrets of SAP S-4HANA Licensing

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}231|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $25,000 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 10 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Vendor Management
    • Parent Category Link: /vendor-management
    • With the relatively slow uptake of the S/4HANA platform, the pressure is immense for SAP to maintain revenue growth.
    • SAP’s definitions and licensing rules are complex and vague, making it extremely difficult to purchase with confidence while remaining compliant.
    • Aggressive audit tactics may be used to speed up the move to HANA.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Mapping SAP products to HANA can be highly complex, leading to overspending and an inability to reduce future spend.
    • The deployment model chosen will directly impact commercial pathways forward.
    • Beware of digital (indirect) access licensing and compliance concerns.
    • Without having a holistic negotiation strategy, it is easy to hit a common obstacle and land into SAP’s playbook, requiring further spend.

    Impact and Result

    • Build a business case to evaluate S/4HANA.
    • Understand the S/4HANA roadmap and map current functionality to ensure compatibility.
    • Understand negotiating pricing and commercial terms.
    • Learn the “SAP way” of conducting business, which includes a best-in-class sales structure, unique contracts, and license use policies combined with a hyper-aggressive compliance function.

    Secrets of SAP S/4HANA Licensing Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should explore the secrets of SAP S/4HANA licensing, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Establish requirements

    Determining SAP’s fit within your organization is critical. Start off by building a business case to assess overarching drivers and justification for change, any net new business benefits and long-term sustainability. Oftentimes the ROI is negative, but the investment sets the stage for long-term growth.

    2. Evaluate licensing options

    Your deployment model is more important than you think. Selecting a deployment model will dictate your licensing options followed by your contractual pathways forward.

    • SAP License Summary and Analysis Tool
    • SAP Digital Access Licensing Pricing Tool

    3. Negotiation and license management

    Know what’s in the contract. Each customer agreement is different and there may be existing terms that are beneficial. Depending on how much is spent, anything can be up for negation.

    • SAP S/4HANA Terms and Conditions Evaluator
    [infographic]

    Looking at Risk in a New Light: The Six Pillars of Vendor Risk Management

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}209|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Vendor Management
    • Parent Category Link: /vendor-management

    • Moreso than at any other time, our world is changing. As a result, organizations – and their vendors – need to be able to adapt their plans to accommodate risk on an unprecedented level.
    • It is increasingly likely that one of an organization's vendors, or their n-party support vendors, will cause an incident. Organizations must protect themselves by creating better mechanisms to hold their n-party vendors accountable and validate that they comply.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Identifying and managing a vendor’s potential risk impact on your organization requires multiple people in the organization across several functions. Those people all need coaching on the potential changes in the market and how these changes may affect your organization.
    • Organizational leadership is often taken unaware by changes, and their plans lack the flexibility to adjust to significant regulatory upheavals.

    Impact and Result

    • Vendor management practices educate organizations on the different potential risks from vendors in your market and suggest creative and alternative ways to avoid and help manage them.
    • Prioritize and classify your vendors with quantifiable, standardized rankings.
    • Prioritize focus on your high-risk vendors.
    • Standardize your processes for identifying and monitoring vendor risks with our Comprehensive Risk Impact Tool to manage potential impacts.

    Looking at Risk in a New Light: The Six Pillars of Vendor Risk Management Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Looking at Risk in a New Light: The Six Pillars of Vendor Risk Management – Use the research to better understand the negative impacts of vendor actions to your organization

    Use this research to identify and quantify the potential risk impacts caused by vendors. Utilize Info-Tech's approach to look at the impact from various perspectives to better prepare for issues that may arise.

    • Looking at Risk in a New Light: The Six Pillars of Vendor Risk Management Storyboard

    2. Comprehensive Risk Impact Tool – Use this tool to help identify and quantify the impacts of negative vendor actions.

    By playing the “what if” game and asking probing questions to draw out – or eliminate – possible negative outcomes, everyone involved adds their insight into parts of the organization to gather a comprehensive picture of potential impacts.

    • Comprehensive Risk Impact Tool
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Looking at Risk in a New Light: The Six Pillars of Vendor Risk Management

    Approach vendor risk impact assessments from all perspectives.

    Analyst Perspective

    Organizations must comprehensively understand the impacts vendors may cause through different potential actions.

    Frank Sewell

    The risks from the vendor market have become more prevalent as the technologies and organizational strategies shift to a global direction. With this shift in risk comes a necessary perspective change to align with the greater likelihood of an incident occurring from vendors' (or one of their downstream support vendor's) negative actions.

    Organizational leadership must become more aware of the increasing risks that engaging vendors impose. To do so, they need to make informed decisions, which can only be provided by engaging expert resources in their organizations to compile a comprehensive look at potential risk impacts.

    Frank Sewell

    Research Director, Vendor Management
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    More so than at any other time, our world is changing. As a result organizations – and their vendors – need to be able to adapt their plans to accommodate risk on an unprecedented level.

    It is increasingly likely that one of your vendors, or their n-party support vendors, will cause an incident. Organizations must protect themselves by creating better mechanisms to hold their n-party vendors accountable and validate that they comply.

    Common Obstacles

    Identifying and managing a vendor’s potential risk impact on your organization requires multiple people in the organization across several functions. Those people all need coaching on the potential changes in the market and how these changes may affect your organization.

    Organizational leadership is often taken unaware by changes, and their plans lack the flexibility to adjust to significant regulatory upheavals.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    Vendor management practices educate organizations on the different potential risks from vendors in your market and suggest creative and alternative ways to avoid and help manage them.

    Prioritize and classify your vendors with quantifiable, standardized rankings.

    Prioritize focus on your high-risk vendors.

    Standardize your processes for identifying and monitoring vendor risks with our Comprehensive Risk Impact Tool to manage potential impacts.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Organizations must evolve their risk assessments to be more adaptive to respond to changes in the global market. Ongoing monitoring and continual assessment of vendors’ risks is crucial to avoiding negative impacts.

    Info-Tech’s multi-blueprint series on vendor risk assessment

    There are many individual components of vendor risk beyond cybersecurity.`

    6 components of vendor risk beyond cybersecurity.  Financial, Reputational, Operational, Strategic, Security, Regulatory & Compliance.

    This series will focus on the individual components of vendor risk and how vendor management practices can facilitate organizations’ understanding of those risks.

    Out of Scope:
    This series will not tackle risk governance, determining overall risk tolerance and appetite, or quantifying inherent risk.

    The world is constantly changing

    The IT market is constantly reacting to global influences. By anticipating changes, leaders can set expectations and work with their vendors to accommodate them.

    When the unexpected happens, being able to adapt quickly to new priorities ensures continued long-term business success.

    Below are some things no one expected to happen in the last few years:

    62%

    of IT professionals are more concerned about being a victim of ransomware than they were a year ago.

    Info-Tech Tech Trends Survey 2022

    82%

    of Microsoft non-essential employees shifted to working from home in 2020, joining the 18% already remote.

    Info-Tech Tech Trends Survey 2022

    89%

    of organizations invested in web conferencing technology to facilitate collaboration.

    Info-Tech Tech Trends Survey 2022

    Looking at Risk in a New Light:

    the 6 Pillars of Vendor Risk Management

    Vendor Risk

    • Financial

    • Strategic

    • Operational

    • Security

    • Reputational

    • Regulatory

    • Organizations must review their risk appetite and tolerance levels, considering their complete landscape.
    • Changing regulations, acquisitions, and events that affect global supply chains are current realities, not unlikely scenarios.
    • Prepare your vendor risk management for success using due diligence and scenario- based “What If” discussions to bring all the relevant parties to the table and educate your whole organization on risk factors.
    Assessing Financial Risk Impacts

    Strategic risks on a global scale

    Odds are at least one of these is currently affecting your strategic plans

    • Vendor Acquisitions
    • Global Pandemic
    • Global Shortages
    • Gas Prices
    • Poor Vendor Performance
    • Travel Bans
    • War
    • Natural Disasters
    • Supply Chain Disruptions
    • Security Incidents

    Make sure you have the right people at the table to identify and plan to manage impacts.

    Assess internal and external operational risk impacts

    Two sides of the same coin

    Internal

    • Poorly vetted supplemental staff
    • Bad system configurations
    • Lack of relevant skills
    • Poor vendor performance
    • Failure to follow established processes
    • Weak contractual accountability
    • Unsupportable or end-of-life system components

    External

    • Cyberattacks
    • Supply Chain Issues
    • Geo-Political Disruptions
    • Vendor Acquisitions
    • N-Party Non-Compliance
    • Vendor Fraud

    Operational risk is the risk of losses caused by flawed or failed processes, policies, systems, or events that disrupt business operations.

    Identify and manage security risk impacts on your organization

    Due diligence will enable successful outcomes

    • Poor vendor performance
    • Vendor acquisition
    • Supply chain disruptions and shortages
    • N-party risk
    • Third-party risk

    What your vendor associations say about you

    Reputations that affect your brand: Bad customer reviews, breach of data, poor security posture, negative news articles, public lawsuits, poor performance.

    Regulatory compliance

    Consider implementing vendor management initiatives and practices in your organization to help gain compliance with your expanding vendor landscape.

    Your organizational risks may be monitored but are your n-party vendors?

    6 components of vendor risk beyond cybersecurity.  Financial, Reputational, Operational, Strategic, Security, Regulatory & Compliance.

    Review your expectations with your vendors and hold them accountable

    Regulatory entities are looking beyond your organization’s internal compliance these days. Instead, they are more and more diving into your third-party and downstream relationships, particularly as awareness of downstream breaches increases globally.

    • Are you assessing your vendors regularly?
    • Are you validating those assessments?
    • Do your vendors have a map of their downstream support vendors?
    • Do they have the mechanisms to hold those downstream vendors accountable to your standards?

    Identify and manage risks

    Regulatory

    Regulatory agencies are putting more enforcement around ESG practices across the globe. As a result, organizations will need to monitor the changing regulations and validate that their vendors and n-party support vendors are adhering to these regulations or face penalties for non-compliance.

    Security-Data protection

    Data protection remains an issue. Organizations should ensure that the data their vendors obtain remains protected throughout the vendor’s lifecycle, including post-termination. Otherwise, they could be monitoring for a data breach in perpetuity.

    Mergers and acquisitions

    More prominent vendors continuously buy smaller companies to control the market in the IT industry. Organizations should put protections in their contracts to ensure that an IT vendor’s acquisition does not put them in a relationship with someone that could cause them an issue.

    Identify and manage risks

    Poor vendor performance

    Consider the impact of a vendor that fails to perform midway through the implementation. Organizations need to be able to manage the impact of replacing that vendor and cutting their losses rather than continuing to throw good money away after bad performance.

    Supply chain disruptions and global shortages

    Geopolitical disruptions and natural disasters have caused unprecedented interruptions to business. Incorporate forecasting of product and ongoing business continuity planning into your strategic plans to adapt as events unfold.

    Poorly configured systems

    Failing to ensure that your vendor-supported systems are properly configured and that your vendors are meeting your IT change control and configuration standards is more commonplace than expected. Proper oversight and management of your support vendors is crucial to ensure they are meeting expectations in this regard.

    What to look for

    Identify potential risk impacts

    • Is there a record of complaints against the vendor from their employees or customers?
    • Is the vendor financially sound, with the resources to support your needs?
    • Has the vendor been cited for regulatory compliance issues in the past?
    • Does the vendor have a comprehensive list of their n-party vendor partners?
      • Are they willing to accept appropriate contractual protections regarding them?
    • Does the vendor self-audit, or do they use a vetted third-party audit firm to issue a SOC report annually?
    • Does the vendor operate in regions known for instability?
    • Is the vendor willing to make concessions on contractual protections, or are they only offering one-sided agreements with as-is warranties?

    Prepare your vendor risk management for success

    Due diligence will enable successful outcomes.

    1. Obtain top-level buy-in; it is critical to success.
    2. Build enterprise risk management (ERM) through incremental improvement.
    3. Focus initial efforts on the “big wins” to prove the process works.
    4. Use existing resources.
    5. Build on any risk management activities that already exist in the organization.
    6. Socialize ERM throughout the organization to gain additional buy-in.
    7. Normalize the process long term with ongoing updates and continuing education for the organization.
    8. (Adapted from COSO)

    How to assess third-party risk

    1. Review organizational risks

      Understand the organizations risks to prepare for the “What If” game exercise.
    2. Identify and understand potential risks

      Play the “What If” game with the right people at the table.
    3. Create a risk profile packet for leadership

      Pull all the information together in a presentation document.
    4. Validate the risks

      Work with leadership to ensure that the proposed risks are in line with their thoughts.
    5. Plan to manage the risks

      Lower the overall risk potential by putting mitigations in place.
    6. Communicate the plan

      It is important not only to have a plan but also to socialize it in the organization for awareness.
    7. Enact the plan

      Once the plan is finalized and socialized, put it in place with continued monitoring for success.

    Adapted from Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance

    Insight summary

    Risk impacts often come from unexpected places and have significant consequences.

    Knowing who your vendors are using for their support and supply chain could be crucial in eliminating the risk of non-compliance for your organization.

    Having a plan to identify and validate the regulatory compliance of your vendors is a must for any organization to avoid penalties.

    Insight 1

    Organizations’ strategic plans need to be adaptable to avoid vendors’ negative actions causing an expedited shift in priorities.

    For example, Philips’ recall of ventilators impacted its products and the availability of its competitors’ products as demand overwhelmed the market.

    Insight 2

    Organizations often fail to understand how n-party vendors could place them in non-compliance.

    Even if you know your complete third-party vendor landscape, you may not be aware of the downstream vendors in play. Ensure that you get visibility into this space as well, and hold your direct vendors accountable for the actions of their vendors.

    Insight 3

    Organizations need to know where their data lives and ensure it is protected.

    Make sure you know which vendors are accessing/storing your data, where they are keeping it, and that you can get it back and have the vendors destroy it when the relationship is over. Without adequate protections throughout the lifecycle of the vendor, you could be monitoring for breaches in perpetuity.

    Insight summary

    Assessing financial impacts is an ongoing, educative, and collaborative multidisciplinary process that vendor management initiatives are uniquely designed to coordinate and manage for organizations.

    Operational risk impacts often come from unexpected places and have unforeseen impacts. Knowing where your vendors place in critical business processes and those vendors' business continuity plans concerning your organization should be a priority for those managing the vendors.

    Insight 4

    Organizations need to learn how to assess the likelihood of potential risks in the rapidly changing online environments and recognize how their partnerships and subcontractors’ actions can affect their brand.

    For example, do you understand how a simple news article raises your profile for short-term and long-term adverse events?

    Insight 5

    Organizations fail to plan for vendor acquisitions appropriately.

    Vendors routinely get acquired in the IT space. Does your organization have appropriate safeguards from inadvertently entering a negative relationship? Do you have plans for replacing critical vendors purchased in such a manner?

    Insight 6

    Vendors are becoming more and more crucial to organizations’ overall operations, and most organizations have a poor understanding of the potential impacts they represent.

    Is your vendor solvent? Do they have enough staff to accommodate your needs? Has their long-term planning been affected by changes in the market? Are they unique in their space?

    Identifying vendor risk

    Who should be included in the discussion?

    • While it is true that executive-level leadership defines the strategy for an organization, it is vital for those making decisions to make informed decisions.
    • Getting input from operational experts at your organization will enhance your business's long-term potential for success.
    • Involving those who directly manage vendors and understand the market will aid operational experts in determining the forward path for relationships with your current vendors and identifying emerging potential strategic partners.
    • Make sure security, risk, and compliance are all at the table. These departments all look at risk from different angles for the business and give valuable insight collectively.
    • Organizations have a wealth of experience in their marketing departments that can help identify real-world scenarios of negative actions.

    See the blueprint Build an IT Risk Management Program

    Review your risk management plans for new risks on a regular basis.

    Keep in mind Risk =
    Likelihood x Impact

    (R=L*I).

    Impact (I) tends to remain the same, while Likelihood (L) is becoming closer to 100% as threat actors become more prevalent.

    Managing vendor risk impacts

    How could your vendors impact your organization?

    • Review vendors’ downstream connections to understand thoroughly who you are in business with
    • Institute continuous vendor lifecycle management
    • Develop IT risk governance and change control
    • Introduce continual risk assessment to monitor the relevant vendor markets
    • Monitor and schedule contract renewals and new service/module negotiations
    • Perform business alignment meetings to reassess relationships
    • Ensure strategic alignment in contracts
    • Review vendors’ business continuity plans and disaster recovery testing
    • Re-evaluate corporate policies frequently
    • Monitor your company’s and associated vendors’ online presence
    • Be adaptable and allow for innovations that arise from the current needs
      • Capture lessons learned from prior incidents to improve over time, and adjust your plans accordingly

    Organizations must review their risk appetite and tolerance levels, considering their complete landscape.

    Changing regulations, acquisitions, new security issues, and events that affect global supply chains are current realities, not unlikely scenarios.

    Ongoing Improvement

    Incorporating lessons learned.

    • Over time, despite everyone’s best observations and plans, incidents will catch us off guard.
    • When that happens, follow your incident response plans and act accordingly.
    • An essential step is to document what worked and what did not – collectively known as the “lessons learned.”
    • Use the lessons learned document to devise, incorporate, and enact a better risk management process.

    Sometimes disasters occur despite our best plans to manage them.

    When this happens, it is important to document the lessons learned and improve our plans going forward.

    The "what if" game

    1-3 hours

    Vendor management professionals are in an excellent position to help senior leadership identify and pull together resources across the organization to determine potential risks. By playing the "what if" game and asking probing questions to draw out – or eliminate – possible adverse outcomes, everyone involved adds their insight into parts of the organization to gather a comprehensive picture of potential impacts.

    1. Break into smaller groups (if too small, continue as a single group).
    2. Use the Comprehensive Risk Impact Tool to prompt discussion on potential risks. Keep this discussion flowing organically to explore all potentials but manage the overall process to keep the discussion pertinent and on track.
    3. Collect the outputs and ask the subject matter experts (SMEs) for management options for each one in order to present a comprehensive risk strategy. You will use this to educate senior leadership so that they can make an informed decision to accept or reject the solution.

    Download the Comprehensive Risk Impact Tool

    Input

    • List of identified potential risk scenarios scored by impact
    • List of potential mitigations of the scenarios to reduce the risk

    Output

    • Comprehensive risk profile on the specific vendor solution

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Comprehensive Risk Impact Tool to help drive discussion

    Participants

    • Vendor Management – Coordinator
    • Organizational Leadership
    • Operations Experts (SMEs)
    • Business Process Experts
    • Legal/Compliance/Risk Manager

    High risk example from tool

    High risk example from Tool.  Shows sample questions to ask to identify impacts, their associated score, weight, and comments or notes.

    Note: Even though a few items are “scored” they have not been added to the overall weight, signaling that the company has noted but does not necessarily hold them against the vendor.

    How to mitigate:

    • Contractually insist that the vendor have a third-party security audit performed annually with the stipulation that they will not denigrate below your acceptable standards.
    • At renewal negotiate better contractual terms and protections for your organization.

    Low risk example from tool

    Low risk example from Tool.  Shows sample questions to ask to identify impacts, their associated score, weight, and comments or notes.

    Summary

    Seek to understand all potential risk impacts to better prepare your organization for success.

    • Organizations need to understand and map out their entire vendor landscape.
    • Understand where all your data lives and how you can control it throughout the vendor lifecycle.
    • Organizations need to be realistic about the likelihood of potential risks in the changing global world.
    • Those organizations that consistently follow their established risk-assessment and due-diligence processes are better positioned to avoid penalties.
    • Understand how your vendors prioritize your organization in their business continuity processes.
    • Bring the right people to the table to outline potential risks in the market and your organization.
    • Socialize the third-party vendor risk management process throughout the organization to heighten awareness and enable employees to help protect the organization.
    • Organizations need to learn how to assess the likelihood of potential risks in the changing global markets and recognize how their partnerships and subcontracts affect their brand.
    • Incorporate lessons learned from prior incidents into your risk management process to build better plans for future issues.

    Organizations must evolve their risk assessments to be more meaningful to respond to global changes in the market.

    Organizations should increase the resources dedicated to monitoring the market as regulatory agencies continue to hold them more and more accountable.

    Bibliography

    Olaganathan, Rajee. “Impact of COVID-19 on airline industry and strategic plan for its recovery with special reference to data analytics technology.” Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances, vol 7, no 1, 2021, pp. 033-046.

    Tonello, Matteo. “Strategic Risk Management: A Primer for Directors.” Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, 23 Aug. 2012.

    Frigo, Mark L., and Richard J. Anderson. “Embracing Enterprise Risk Management: Practical Approaches for Getting Started.” COSO, 2011.

    Weak Cybersecurity is taking a toll on Small Businesses (tripwire.com)

    SecureLink 2022 White Paper SL_Page_EA+PAM (rocketcdn.me)

    Shared Assessments Member Poll March 2021 "Guide: Evolving Work Environments Impact of Covid-19 on Profile and Management of Third Parties“

    “Cybersecurity only the tip of the iceberg for third-party risk management”. Help Net Security, April 21, 2021. Accessed: 2022-07-29.

    “Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) Managed Services”. Deloitte, 2022. Accessed: 2022-07-29.

    “The Future of TPRM: Third Party Risk Management Predictions for 2022”. OneTrust, December 20th2021. Accessed 2022-07-29.

    “Third Party Vendor definition”. Law Insider, Accessed 2022-07-29.

    “Third Party Risk”. AWAKE Security, Accessed 2022-07-29.

    Glidden, Donna. "Don't Underestimate the Need to Protect Your Brand in Publicity Clauses", Info-Tech Research Group, June 2022.

    Greenaway, Jordan. "Managing Reputation Risk: A start-to-finish guide", Transmission Private, July 2022. Accessed June 2022.

    Jagiello, Robert D, and Thomas T Hills. “Bad News Has Wings: Dread Risk Mediates Social Amplification in Risk Communication. ”Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis vol. 38,10 (2018): 2193-2207.doi:10.1111/risa.13117

    Kenton, Will. "Brand Recognition", Investopedia, August 2021. Accessed June 2022. Lischer, Brian. "How Much Does it Cost to Rebrand Your Company?", Ignyte, October 2017. Accessed June 2022.

    "Powerful Examples of How to Respond to Negative Reviews", Review Trackers, February 2022. Accessed June 2022.

    "The CEO Reputation Premium: Gaining Advantage in the Engagement Era", Weber Shadwick, March 2015. Accessed on June 2022.

    "Valuation of Trademarks: Everything You Need to Know",UpCounsel, 2022. Accessed June 2022.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Identify and Manage Financial Risk Impacts on Your Organization

    • Vendor management practices educate organizations on potential financial impacts that vendors may incur and suggest systems to help manage them.
    • Standardize your processes for identifying and monitoring vendor risks to manage financial impacts with our Financial Risk Impact Tool.

    Identify and Manage Reputational Risk Impacts on Your Organization

    • Vendor management practices educate organizations on potential risks to vendors in your market and suggest creative and alternative ways to avoid and help manage them.
    • Standardize your processes for identifying and monitoring vendor risks to manage potential impacts on your reputation and brand with our Reputational Risk Impact Tool.

    Identify and Manage Strategic Risk Impacts on Your Organization

    • Vendor management practices educate organizations on potential risks to vendors in your market and suggest creative and alternative ways to avoid and help manage them.
    • Standardize your processes for identifying and monitoring vendor risks to manage potential impacts on your strategic plan with our Strategic Risk Impact Tool.

    Regulatory guidance and industry standards

    Dive Into Five Years of Security Strategies

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}247|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Security Strategy & Budgeting
    • Parent Category Link: /security-strategy-and-budgeting
    • As organizations build their security programs, there is often the question of what are other companies doing.
    • Part of this is a desire to know whether challenges are unique to certain companies, but also to understand how people are tackling some of their security gaps.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Don’t just wonder what others are doing – use this report to see how companies are faring in their current state, where they want to target in their future state, and the ways they’re planning to raise their security posture.

    Impact and Result

    • Whether you’re building out your security program for the first time or are just interested in how others are faring, review insights from 66 security strategies in this report.
    • This research complements the blueprint, Build an Information Security Program, and can be used as a guide while completing that project.

    Dive Into Five Years of Security Strategies Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out what this report contains.

    [infographic]

    Break Open Your DAM With Intuitive Metadata

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}389|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Data Management
    • Parent Category Link: /data-management
    • Organizations are facing challenges from explosive information growth in both volume and complexity, as well as the need to use more new sources of information for social media just to remain in business.
    • A lot of content can be created quickly, but managing those digital assets properly through metadata tagging that will be used consistently and effectively requires processes to be in place to create standardized and informational metadata at the source of content creation.
    • Putting these processes in place changes the way the organization handles its information, which may generate pushback, and requires socialization and proper management of the metadata strategy.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Metadata is an imperative part of the organizations broader information management strategy. Some may believe that metadata is not needed anymore; Google search is not a magic act – it relies on information tagging that reflects cultural sentiment.
    • Metadata should be pliable. It needs to grow with the changing cultural and corporate vernacular and knowledge, and adapt to changing needs.
    • Build a map for your metadata before you dig for buried treasure. Implement metadata standards and processes for current digital assets before chasing after your treasure troves of existing artifacts.

    Impact and Result

    • Create a sustainable and effective digital asset management (DAM) program by understanding Info-Tech’s DAM framework and how the framework fits within your organization for better management of key digital assets.
    • Create an enterprise-wide metadata design principles handbook to keep track of metadata schemas and standards, as well as communicate the standards to the entire organization.
    • Gather requirements for your DAM program, as well as the DAM system and roles, by interviewing key stakeholders and identifying prevalent pains and opportunities. Understand where digital assets are created, used, and stored throughout the enterprise to gain a high-level perspective of DAM requirements.
    • Identify the organization’s current state of metadata management along with the target state, identify the gaps, and then define solutions to fill those gaps. Ensure business initiatives are woven into the mix.
    • Create a comprehensive roadmap to prioritize initiatives and delineate responsibilities.

    Break Open Your DAM With Intuitive Metadata Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should develop a digital asset management program focused on metadata, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Build a foundation for your DAM project

    Gain an in-depth understanding of what digital asset management is as well as how it is supported by Info-Tech’s DAM framework.

    • Break Open Your DAM With Intuitive Metadata – Phase 1: Build a Foundation for Your DAM Project
    • DAM Design Principles Handbook
    • Where in the World Is My Digital Asset? Tool
    • Digital Asset Inventory Tool
    • DAM Requirements Gathering Tool

    2. Dive into the DAM strategy

    Create a metadata program execution strategy and assess current and target states for the organization’s DAM.

    • Break Open Your DAM With Intuitive Metadata – Phase 2: Dive Into the DAM Strategy
    • DAM Roadmap Tool
    • DAM Metadata Execution Strategy Document

    3. Create intuitive metadata for your DAM

    Design a governance plan for ongoing DAM and metadata management.

    • Break Open Your DAM With Intuitive Metadata – Phase 3: Create Intuitive Metadata for Your Digital Assets
    • Metadata Manager Tool
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Break Open Your DAM With Intuitive Metadata

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Structure the Metadata Project

    The Purpose

    Develop a foundation of knowledge regarding DAM and metadata, as well as the best practices for organizing the organization’s information and digital assets for ideal findability.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Design standardized processes for metadata creation and digital asset management to help to improve findability of key assets.

    Gain knowledge of how DAM can benefit both IT and the business.

    Activities

    1.1 Build a DAM and metadata knowledge foundation.

    1.2 Kick-start creation of the organization’s DAM design principles handbook.

    1.3 Interview key business units to understand drivers for the program.

    1.4 Develop a DAM framework.

    Outputs

    DAM Design Principles Handbook

    DAM Execution Strategy Document

    2 Assess Requirements for the DAM Program

    The Purpose

    Inventory the organization’s key digital assets and their repositories.

    Gather the organization’s requirements for a full-time digital asset librarian, as well as the DAM system.  

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Determine clear and specific requirements for the organization from the DAM system and the people involved.

    Activities

    2.1 Conduct a digital asset inventory to identify key assets to include in DAM.

    2.2 Prioritize digital assets to determine their risk and value to ensure appropriate support through the information lifecycle.

    2.3 Determine the requirements of the business and IT for the DAM system and its metadata.

    Outputs

    Digital Asset Inventory Tool

    DAM Requirements Gathering Tool

    3 Design Roadmap and Plan Implementation

    The Purpose

    Determine strategic initiatives and create a roadmap outlining key steps required to get the organization to start enabling data-driven insights.

    Determine timing of the initiatives. 

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Establish a clear direction for the DAM program.

    Build a step-by-step outline of how to create effective metadata with true business-IT collaboration.

    Have prioritized initiatives with dependencies mapped out.

    Activities

    3.1 Assess current and target states of DAM in the organization.

    3.2 Brainstorm and document practical initiatives to close the gap.

    3.3 Discuss strategies rooted in business requirements to execute the metadata management program to improve findability of digital assets.

    Outputs

    DAM Roadmap Tool

    4 Establish Metadata Governance

    The Purpose

    Identify the roles required for effective DAM and metadata management.

    Create sample metadata according to established guiding principles and implement a feedback method to create intuitive metadata in the organization. 

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Metadata management is an ongoing project. Implementing it requires user input and feedback, which governance will help to support.

    By integrating metadata governance with larger information or data governance bodies, DAM and metadata management will gain sustainability. 

    Activities

    4.1 Discuss and assign roles and responsibilities for initiatives identified in the roadmap.

    4.2 Review policy requirements for the information assets in the organization and strategies to address enforcement.

    4.3 Integrate the governance of metadata into larger governance committees.

    Outputs

    DAM Execution Strategy

    Develop Your Agile Approach for a Successful Transformation

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}163|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.2/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $86,469 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 16 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Development
    • Parent Category Link: /development
    • Your organization wants to shorten delivery time and improve quality by adopting Agile delivery methods.
    • You know that Agile transformations are complex and difficult to implement.
    • Your organization may have started using Agile, but with only limited success.
    • You want to maximize your Agile transformation’s chances of success.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Agile transformations are more likely to be successful when the entire organization understands Agile fundamentals, principles, and practices; the “different way of working” that Agile requires; and the role each person plays in its success.

    Impact and Result

    • Understand the “what and why” of Agile.
    • Identify your organization’s biggest Agile pain points.
    • Gain a deeper understanding of Agile principles and practices, and apply these to your Agile pain points.
    • Create a list of action items to address your organization’s Agile challenges.

    Develop Your Agile Approach for a Successful Transformation Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Identify common Agile challenges

    Identify your organization's biggest Agile pain points so you can focus attention on those topics that are impacting your Agile capabilities the most.

    • Develop Your Agile Approach for a Successful Transformation – Phases 1-2

    2. Establish a solid foundation for Agile delivery

    Ensure that your organization has a solid understanding of Agile principles and practices to help ensure your Agile transformation is successful. Understand Agile's different way of working and identify the steps your organization will need to take to move from traditional Waterfall delivery to Agile.

    • Roadmap for Transition to Agile

    3. Backlog Management Module: Manage your backlog effectively

    The Backlog Management Module helps teams develop a better understanding of backlog management and user story decomposition. Improve your backlog quality by implementing a three-tiered backlog with quality filters.

    4. Scrum Simulation Module: Simulate effective Scrum practices

    The Scrum Simulation Module helps teams develop a better understanding of Scrum practices and the behavioral blockers affecting Agile teams and organizational culture. This module features two interactive simulations to encourage a deeper understanding of good Scrum practices and Agile principles.

    • Scrum Simulation Exercise (Online Banking App)

    5. Estimation Module: Improve product backlog item estimation

    The Estimation Module helps teams develop a better understanding of Agile estimation practices and how to apply them. Teams learn how Agile estimation and reconciliation provide reliable planning estimates.

    6. Product Owner Module: Establish an Effective Product Owner Role

    The Product Owner Module helps teams understand product management fundamentals and a deeper understanding of the product owner role. Teams define their product management terminology, create quality filters for PBIs moving through the backlog, and develop their product roadmap approach for key audiences.

    7. Product Roadmapping Module: Create effective product roadmaps

    The Product Roadmapping Module helps teams understand product road mapping fundamentals. Teams learn to effectively use the six tools of Product Roadmapping.

    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Develop Your Agile Approach for a Successful Transformation

    Understand Agile fundamentals, principles, and practices so you can apply them effectively in your organization.

    Analyst Perspective

    Understand Agile fundamentals, principles, and practices so you can apply them effectively in your organization.

    Pictures of Alex Ciraco and Hans Eckman

    Alex Ciraco and Hans Eckman
    Application Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    • Your organization wants to shorten delivery time and improve quality by adopting Agile delivery methods.
    • You know that Agile transformations are complex and difficult to implement.
    • Your organization may have started using Agile, but with only limited success.
    • You want to maximize your Agile transformation's chances of success.

    Common Obstacles

    • People seem to have different, conflicting, or inadequate knowledge of Agile principles and practices.
    • Your organization is not seeing the full benefits that Agile promises, and project teams aren't sure they are "doing Agile right."
    • Confusion and misinformation about Agile is commonplace in your organization.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    • Use our Common Agile Challenges Survey to identify your organization's Agile pain points.
    • Leverage this blueprint to level-set the organization on Agile fundamentals.
    • Address your survey's biggest Agile pain points to see immediate benefits and improvements in the way you practice Agile in your organization.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Agile transformations are more likely to be successful when the entire organization genuinely understands Agile fundamentals, principles and practices, as well as the role each person plays in its success. Focus on developing a solid understanding of Agile practices so your organization can "Be Agile", not just "Do Agile".

    Info-Tech's methodology

    1. Identify Common Agile Challenges

    2. Establish a Solid Foundation for Agile Delivery

    3. Agile Modules

    Phase Steps

    1.1 Identify common agile challenges

    2.1 Align teams with Agile fundamentals

    2.2 Interpret your common Agile challenges survey results

    2.3 (Optional) Move stepwise to iterative Agile delivery

    2.4 Identify insights and team feedback

    • Backlog Management Module:
      Manage Your Backlog Effectively
    • Scrum Simulation Module:
      Simulate Effective Scrum Practices
    • Estimation Module:
      Improve Product Backlog Item Estimation
    • Product Owner Module:
      Establish an Effective Product Owner Role
    • Product Roadmapping Module: Create Effective Product Roadmaps
    Phase Outcomes

    Understand common challenges associated with Agile transformations and identify your organization's struggles.

    Establish and apply a uniform understanding of Agile fundamentals and principles.

    Create a roadmap for your transition to Agile delivery and prioritized challenges.

    Foster deeper understanding of Agile principles and practices to resolve pain points.

    Develop your agile approach for a successful transformation

    Everyone's Agile journey is not the same.

    agile journey for a successful transformation

    Application delivery continues to fall short

    78% of IT professionals believe the business is "usually" or "always" out of sync with project requirements.
    Source: "10 Ways Requirements Can Sabotage Your Projects Right From the Start"

    Only 34% of software is rated as both important and effective by users.

    Source: Info-Tech's CIO Business Vision Diagnostic

    Agile DevOps is a progression of cultural, behavioral, and process changes. It takes time.

    An image of the trail to climb Mount Everest, with the camps replaced by the main steps of the agile approach to reaching Nirvana.

    Enhancements and maintenance are misunderstood

    an image showing the relationship between enhancements and maintenance.

    Source: "IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering"

    Why Agile/DevOps? It's about time to value

    Leaders and stakeholders are frustrated with long lead times to implement changes. Agile/DevOps promotes smaller, more frequent releases to start earning value sooner.

    A frequency graph showing the Time to delivering value depends on Frequency of Releases

    Time to delivering value depends on Frequency of Releases

    Embrace change, don't "scope creep" it

    64% of IT professionals adopt Agile to enhance their ability to manage changing priorities.

    71% of IT professionals found their ability to manage changing priorities improved after implementing Agile.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Traditional delivery processes work on the assumption that product requirements will remain constant throughout the SDLC. This results in delayed delivery of product enhancements which are critical to maintaining a positive customer experience.

    Adapted from: "12th Annual State of Agile Report"

    Agile's four core values

    "…while there is value in the items on the right, we value the items on the left more."
    – Source: "The Agile Manifesto"

    We value. . .

    Individuals and Interactions

    OVER

    Processes and Tools

    Working Software

    OVER

    Comprehensive Documentation

    Customer Collaboration

    OVER

    Contract Negotiation

    Responding to Change

    OVER

    Following a Plan

    Being Agile

    OVER

    Being Prescriptive

    Harness Agile's cultural advantages

    Collaboration

    • Team members leverage all their experience working toward a common goal.

    Iterations

    • Cycles provide opportunities for more product feedback.

    Continual Improvement

    • Self-managing teams continually improve their approach for the next iteration.

    Prioritization

    • The most important needs are addressed in the current iteration.

    Compare Waterfall and Agile – the "what" (how are they different?)

    This is an example of the Waterfall Approach.

    A "One and Done" Approach (Planning & Documentation Based)
    Elapsed time to deliver any value: Months to years

    This is an example of the Agile Approach

    An "Iterative" Approach (Empirical/Evidence Based)
    Elapsed time to deliver any value: Weeks

    Be aware of common myths around Agile

    1. … solve development and communication issues.
    2. … ensure you will finish requirements faster.
    3. … mean you don't need planning and documentation.

    "Although Agile methods are increasingly being adopted in globally distributed settings, there is no panacea for success."
    – "Negotiating Common Ground in Distributed Agile Development: A Case Study Perspective."

    "Without proper planning, organizations can start throwing more resources at the work which spirals into the classic Waterfall issues of managing by schedule."
    – Kristen Morton, Associate Implementation Architect,
    OneShield Inc., Info-Tech Interview

    Agile* SDLC

    With shared ownership instead of silos, we can deliver value at the end of every iteration (aka sprint)

    An image of the Agile SDLC Approach.

    * There are many Agile methodologies to choose from, but Scrum is by far the most widely used (and is shown above).

    Key Elements of the Agile SDLC

    • You are not "one-and-done." There are many short iterations with constant feedback.
    • There is an empowered product owner. This is a single authoritative voice that represents stakeholders.
    • There is a fluid product backlog. This enables prioritization of requirements "just-in-time."
    • Cross-functional, self-managing team. This team makes commitments and is empowered by the organization to do so.
    • Working, tested code at the end of each sprint. Value becomes more deterministic along sprint boundaries.
    • Demonstrate to stakeholders. Allow them to see and use the functionality and provide necessary feedback.
    • Feedback is being continuously injected back into the product backlog. This shapes the future of the solution.
    • Continuous improvement through sprint retrospectives.
    • "Internally Governed" when done right (the virtuous cycle of sprint-demo-feedback).

    A backlog stores and organizes PBIs at various stages of readiness

    A well-formed backlog can be thought of as a DEEP backlog:

    • Detailed Appropriately: Product backlog items (PBIs) are broken down and refined as necessary.
    • Emergent: The backlog grows and evolves over time as PBIs are added and removed.
    • Estimated: The effort a PBI requires is estimated at each tier.
    • Prioritized: The PBIs value and priority are determined at each tier.

    (Perforce, 2018)

    An image showing the Ideas; Qualified; Ready; funnel leading to the sprint approach.

    Outline the criteria to proceed to the next tier via quality filters

    Expand the concepts of defining "ready" and "done" to include the other stages of a PBIs journey through product planning.

    An image showing the approach you will use to Outline the criteria to proceed to the next tier via quality filters

    Info-Tech Insight: A quality filter ensures quality is met and teams are armed with the right information to work more efficiently and improve throughput.

    Deliverables

    Many steps in this blueprint are accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals.

    Common Agile Challenges Survey
    Survey the organization to understand which of the common Agile challenges the organization is experiencing

    A screenshot from Common Agile Challenges Survey

    Roadmap for Transition to Agile
    Identify steps you will take to move your organization toward Agile delivery

    A screenshot from Roadmap for Transition to Agile

    Blueprint benefits

    IT Benefits

    Business Benefits

    • Consistent Agile delivery teams.
    • Delivery prioritized with business needs and committed work is achievable.
    • Improved ability to adjust future delivery cycles to meet changing business, market, and end-user needs.
    • Increased alignment and stability of resources with products and technology areas.
    • Reduction in the mean time to delivery of product backlog items.
    • Reduction in technical debt.
    • Better delivery alignment with enterprise goals, vision, and outcomes.
    • Improved coordination with product owners and stakeholders.
    • Quantifiable value realization following each release.
    • Product decisions made at the right time and with the right input.
    • Improved team morale and productivity.
    • Improved operational efficiency and process automation.
    • Increased employee retention and quality of new hires.
    • Reduction in accumulated project risk.

    Measure the value of this blueprint

    Implementing quality and consistent Agile practices improves SDLC metrics and reduces time to value.

    • Use Select and Use SDLC Metrics Effectivelyto track and measure the impact of Agile delivery. For example:
      • Reduction in PBI wait time
      • Improve throughput
      • Reduction in defects and defect severity
    • Phase 1 helps you prepare and send your Common Agile Challenges Survey.
    • Phase 2 builds a transformation plan aligned with your top pain points.

    Align Agile coaching and practices to address your key pain points identified in the Common Agile Challenges Survey.

    A screenshot from Common Agile Challenges Survey

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful."

    Guided Implementation

    "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track."

    Workshop

    "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place."

    Consulting

    "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    This is an image of the eight calls which will take place over phases 1-3.

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is between 6 to 8 calls over the course of 1 to 2 months.

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Phases 1-2
    1.5 - 3.0 days estimated

    Backlog Management
    0.5 - 1.0 days estimated

    Scrum Simulation
    1.25 - 2.25 days estimated

    Estimation
    1.0 - 1.25 days estimated

    Product Owner
    1.0 - 1.75 days estimated

    Product Roadmapping
    0.5 - 1.0 days estimated

    Establish a Solid Foundation for Agile Delivery

    Define the
    IT Target State

    Assess the IT
    Current State

    Bridge the Gap and
    Create the Strategy

    Establish an Effective Product Owner Role

    Create Effective Product Roadmaps

    Activities

    1.1 Gather Agile challenges and gaps
    2.1 Align teams with Agile fundamentals
    2.2 Interpret your common Agile challenges survey results
    2.3 (Optional) Move stepwise to iterative Agile delivery
    2.4 Identify insights and team feedback

    1. User stories and the art of decomposition
    2. Effective backlog management and refinement
    3. Identify insights and team feedback
    1. Scrum sprint planning and retrospective simulation
    2. Pass the balls – sprint velocity game
    1. Improve product backlog item estimation
    2. Agile estimation fundamentals
    3. Understand the wisdom of crowds
    4. Identify insights and team feedback
    1. Understand product management fundamentals
    2. The critical role of the product owner
    3. Manage effective product backlogs and roadmaps
    4. Identify insights and team feedback
    1. Identify your product roadmapping pains
    2. The six "tools" of product roadmapping
    3. Product roadmapping exercise

    Deliverables

    1. Identify your organization's biggest Agile pain points.
    2. Establish common Agile foundations.
    3. Prioritize support for a better Agile delivery approach.
    4. Plan to move stepwise to iterative Agile delivery.
    1. A better understanding of backlog management and user story decomposition.
    1. Scrum sprint planning and retrospective simulation
    2. Pass the balls – sprint velocity game
    1. Improve product backlog item estimation
    2. Agile estimation fundamentals
    3. Understand the wisdom of crowds
    4. Identify insights and team feedback
    1. Understand product management fundamentals
    2. The critical role of the product owner
    3. Manage effective product backlogs and roadmaps
    4. Identify insights and team feedback
    1. Understand product vs. project orientation.
    2. Understand product roadmapping fundamentals.

    Agile Modules

    For additional assistance planning your workshop, please refer to the facilitation planning tool in the appendix.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Mentoring for Agile Teams
    Get practical help and guidance on your Agile transformation journey.

    Implement DevOps Practices That Work
    Streamline business value delivery through the strategic adoption of DevOps practices.

    Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision
    Build a product vision your organization can take from strategy through execution.

    Deliver Digital Products at Scale
    Deliver value at the scale of your organization through defining enterprise product families.

    Phase 1

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    Agile Modules

    1.1 Identify common Agile challenges

    2.1 Align teams with Agile fundamentals

    2.2 Interpret your common Agile challenges survey results

    2.3 (Optional) Move stepwise to iterative Agile delivery

    2.4 Identify insights and team feedback

    • Backlog Management Module: Manage Your Backlog Effectively
    • Scrum Simulation Module: Simulate Effective Scrum Practices
    • Estimation Module: Improve Product Backlog Item Estimation
    • Product Owner Module: Establish an Effective Product Owner Role
    • Product Roadmapping: Create Effective Product Roadmaps

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Decide who will participate in the Common Agile Challenges Survey
    • Compile the results of the survey to identify your organization's biggest pain points with Agile

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Develop Your Agile Approach for a Successful Transformation

    Step 1.1

    Identify common Agile challenges

    Activities

    1.1 Distribute Common Agile Challenges Survey and collect results

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Outcomes of this step

    • A better understanding of your organization's Agile pain points.

    Focus Agile support where it is most needed

    A screenshot from Common Agile Challenges Survey

    Info-Tech Insight

    There isn't one approach that cures all the problems your Agile teams are facing. First, understand these common challenges, then develop a plan to address the root causes.

    Use Info-Tech's Common Agile Challenges Survey to determine common issues and what problems individual teams are facing. Use the Agile modules and supporting guides in this blueprint to provide targeted support on what matters most.

    Exercise 1.1.1 Distribute Common Agile Challenges Survey

    30 minutes

    1. Download Survey Template: Info-Tech Common Agile Challenges Survey template.
    2. Create your own local copy of the Common Agile Challenges Survey by using the template. The Common Agile Challenges Survey will help you to identify which of the many common Agile-related challenges your organization may be facing.
    3. Decide on the teams/participants who will be completing the survey. It is best to distribute the survey broadly across the organization and include participants from several teams and roles.
    4. Copy the link for your local survey and distribute it for participants to complete (we suggest giving them one week to complete it).
    5. Collect the consolidated survey results in preparation for the next phase.
    6. NOTE: Using this survey template requires having access to Microsoft Forms. If you do not have access to Microsoft Forms, an Info-Tech analyst can perform the survey for you.

    Output

    • Your organization's biggest Agile pain points

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Record the results in the Roadmap for Transition to Agile Template

    Phase 2

    Establish a Solid Foundation for Agile Delivery

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    Agile Modules

    1.1 Identify common Agile challenges

    2.1 Align teams with Agile fundamentals

    2.2 Interpret your common Agile challenges survey results

    2.3 (Optional) Move stepwise to iterative Agile delivery

    2.4 Identify insights and team feedback

    • Backlog Management Module: Manage Your Backlog Effectively
    • Scrum Simulation Module: Simulate Effective Scrum Practices
    • Estimation Module: Improve Product Backlog Item Estimation
    • Product Owner Module: Establish an Effective Product Owner Role
    • Product Roadmapping: Create Effective Product Roadmaps

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Gain a fundamental understanding of Agile
    • Understand why becoming Agile is hard
    • Identify steps needed to become more Agile
    • Understand your biggest Agile pain points

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Step 2.1

    Align teams with Agile fundamentals

    Activities

    2.1.1 Share what Agile means to you
    2.1.2 (Optional) Contrast two delivery teams
    2.1.3 (Optional) Dissect the Agilist's Oath
    2.1.4 (Optional) Create your prototype definitions of ready
    2.1.5 (Optional) Create your prototype definitions of done
    2.1.6 Identify the challenges of implementing agile in your organization

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Outcomes of this step

    • A better understanding of what Agile is and why we do it.

    Exercise 2.1.1 Share what Agile means to you

    30-60 minutes

    1. What is Agile? Why do we do it?
    2. As a group, discuss and capture your thoughts on:
      1. What is Agile (its characteristics, practices, differences from alternatives, etc.)?
      2. Why do we do it (its drivers, benefits, advantages, etc.)?
    3. Capture your findings in the table below:

    What is Agile?

    Why do we do it?

    (e.g. Agile mindset, principles, and practices)

    (e.g. benefits)

    Output

    • Your current understanding of Agile and its benefits

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Why Agile/DevOps? It's about time to value

    Leaders and stakeholders are frustrated with long lead times to implement changes. Agile/DevOps promotes smaller, more frequent releases to start earning value sooner.

    A graph demonstrating the increased frequency of release expected over time, from 1960 - present

    Time to delivering value depends on frequency of releases.
    Source: 5Q Partners

    The pandemic accelerated the speed of digital transformation

    With the massive disruption preventing people from gathering, businesses shifted to digital interactions with customers.

    December 2019 - 36%; acceleration of 3 years; July 2020 - 58%.

    Companies also accelerated the pace of creating digital or digitally enhanced products and services.

    December 2019 - 35%; acceleration of 3 years; July 2020 - 55%.

    (McKinsey, 2020 )

    "The Digital Economy incorporates all economic activity reliant on or significantly enhanced by the use of digital inputs, including digital technologies, digital infrastructure, digital services and data."
    (OECD Definition)

    What does "elite" DevOps look like?

    This is an image of an annotated table showing what elite devops looks like.

    Where are you now?
    Where do You Want to Be?

    * Google Cloud/Accelerate State of DevOps 2021

    Realize and sustain value with DevOps

    Businesses with elite DevOps practices…

    973x more frequent faster lead time code deployments from commit to deploy, 3x 6570x lower change failure rate faster time to recover.

    Waterfall vs. Agile – the "what" (How are they different?)

    This is an example of the Waterfall Approach.

    A "One and Done" Approach (Planning & Documentation Based)
    Elapsed time to deliver any value: Months to years

    This is an example of the Agile Approach

    An "Iterative" Approach (Empirical/Evidence Based)
    Elapsed time to deliver any value: Weeks

    (Optional) Exercise 2.1.2 A tale of two teams

    Discussion (5-10 minutes)

    As a group, discuss how these teams differ

    Team 1:
    An image of the business analyst passing the requirements baton to the architect runner.

    Team 2:
    An image of team of soldiers carrying a heavy log up a beach

    Image Credit: DVIDS

    Discuss differences between these teams:
    • How are they different?
    • How would you coach/train/manage/lead?
    • How does team members' behavior differ?
    • How would you measure each team?
    What would have to happen at your organization to make working like this possible?

    Output

    • How your organization can support Agile behavior and mindset

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Dissect the Agilist's Oath

    Read and consider each element of the oath.

    • As a member of this Scrum team, I recognize that we are all equally and collectively responsible for the success of this project.
    • Success is defined as achieving the best possible outcome for our stakeholders given the constraints of time, money, and circumstances we will face.
    • We will achieve this by working collaboratively with our product owner to regularly deliver high-quality, working, tested code that can be demonstrated, and we will adjust our path forward based on the feedback we receive.
    • I will holistically embrace the concept of "good enough for now" into my work practices, because I know that waiting for the best/perfect solution does not yield optimal results.
    • Collectively, we will work to holistically minimize risk for the project across all phases and disciplines.
    • My primary role will be _____ [PO, SM, BA, Dev, Arch, Test, Ops, etc.], but I will contribute wherever and however best serves the current needs of the project.
    • I recognize that working in Agile/Scrum is not an excuse to ignore important things like adequate design and documentation. Collectively, we will ensure that these things are completed incrementally to a level of detail and quality which adequately serves the organization and stakeholders.
    • We are a team, and we will succeed or fail as one.

    Exercise 2.1.3 (Optional) Dissect the Agilist's Oath

    30 minutes

    1. Each bullet point in the Agilist's Oath is chosen to convey one of eight key messages about Agile practices and the mindset change that's required by everyone involved.
    2. As a group, discuss the "message" for each bullet point in the Agilist's Oath. Then identify which of them would be "easy" and "hard" to achieve in your organization.
    • As a member of this Scrum team, I recognize that we are all equally and collectively responsible for the success of this project.
    • Success is defined as achieving the best possible outcome for our stakeholders given the constraints of time, money, and circumstances we will face.
    • We will achieve this by working collaboratively with our product owner to regularly deliver high-quality, working, tested code that can be demonstrated, and we will adjust our path forward based on the feedback we receive.
    • I will holistically embrace the concept of "good enough for now" into my work practices, because I know that waiting for the best/perfect solution does not yield optimal results.
    • Collectively, we will work to holistically minimize risk for the project across all phases and disciplines.
    • My primary role will be _____ [PO, SM, BA, Dev, Arch, Test, Ops, etc.], but I will contribute wherever and however best serves the current needs of the project.
    • I recognize that working in Agile/Scrum is not an excuse to ignore important things like adequate design and documentation. Collectively, we will ensure that these things are completed incrementally to a level of detail and quality which adequately serves the organization and stakeholders.
    • We are a team, and we will succeed or fail as one.

    Which aspects of the Agilist's Oath are "easy" in your org?

    Which aspects of the Agilist's Oath are "hard" in your org?

    Output

    • How your organization can support Agile behavior and mindset

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Be aware of common myths around Agile

    Agile does not . . . .

    1. … solve development and communication issues.
    2. … ensure you will finish requirements faster.
    3. … mean you don't need planning and documentation.

    "Although Agile methods are increasingly being adopted in globally distributed settings, there is no panacea for success."
    – "Negotiating Common Ground in Distributed Agile Development: A Case Study Perspective."

    "Without proper planning, organizations can start throwing more resources at the work which spirals into the classic Waterfall issues of managing by schedule."
    – Kristen Morton, Associate Implementation Architect,
    OneShield Inc., Info-Tech Interview

    Agile's four core values

    "…while there is value in the items on the right, we value the items on the left more."
    – Source: "The Agile Manifesto"

    We value. . .

    Individuals and Interactions

    OVER

    Processes and Tools

    Working Software

    OVER

    Comprehensive Documentation

    Customer Collaboration

    OVER

    Contract Negotiation

    Responding to Change

    OVER

    Following a Plan

    Being Agile

    OVER

    Being Prescriptive

    Consider the traditional/Waterfall SDLC

    With siloes and handoffs, valuable product is delivered only at the end of an extended project lifecycle.

    This is an image of the Traditional Waterfall SDLC approach

    View additional transition models in the appendix

    Agile* SDLC

    With shared ownership instead of silos, we can deliver value at the end of every iteration (aka sprint)

    Key Elements of the Agile SDLC

    • You are not "one-and-done". There are many short iterations with constant feedback.
    • There is an empowered product owner. This is a single authoritative voice that represents stakeholders.
    • There is a fluid product backlog. This enables prioritization of requirements "just-in-time"
    • Cross-functional, self-managing team. This team makes commitments and is empowered by the organization to do so.
    • Working, tested code at the end of each sprint. Value becomes more deterministic along sprint boundaries.
    • Demonstrate to stakeholders. Allow them to see and use the functionality and provide necessary feedback.
    • Feedback is being continuously injected back into the product backlog. This shapes the future of the solution.
    • Continuous improvement through sprint retrospectives.
    • "Internally Governed" when done right (the virtuous cycle of sprint-demo-feedback).

    This is a picture of the Agile SDLC approach.

    * There are many Agile methodologies to choose from, but Scrum (shown above) is by far the most widely used.

    Scrum roles and responsibilities

    Product Owner

    Scrum Master

    Team Members

    Responsible

    • For identifying the product features and their importance in the final deliverable.
    • For refining and reprioritizing the backlog that identifies which features will be delivered in the next sprint based on business importance.
    • For clearing blockers and escalations when necessary.
    • For leading scrums, retrospectives, sprint reviews, and demonstrations.
    • For team building and resolving team conflicts.
    • For creating, testing, deploying, and supporting deliverables and valuable features.
    • For self-managing. There is no project manager assigning tasks to each team member.

    Accountable

    • For delivering valuable features to stakeholders.
    • For ensuring communication throughout development.
    • For ensuring high-quality deliverables for the product owner.

    Consulted

    • By the team through collaboration, rather than contract negotiation.
    • By the product owner on resolution of risks.
    • By the team on suggestions for improvement.
    • By the scrum master and product owner during sprint planning to determine level of complexity of tasks.

    Informed

    • On the progress of the current sprint.
    • By the team on work completed during the current sprint.
    • On direction of the business and current priorities.

    Scrum ceremonies

    Are any of these challenges for your organization? Done When:

    Project Backlog Refinement (PO & SM): Prepare user stories to be used in the next two to three future sprints. User stories are broken down into small manageable pieces of work that should not span sprints. If a user story is too big for a sprint, it is broken down further here. The estimation of the user story is examined, as well as the acceptance criteria, and each is adjusted as necessary from the Agile team members' input.

    Regularly over the project's lifespan

    Sprint Planning (PO, SM & Delivery Team): Discuss the work for the upcoming sprint with the business. Establish a clear understanding of the expectations of the team and the sprint. The product owner decides if priority and content of the user stories is still accurate. The development team decides what they believe can be completed in the sprint, using the user stories, in priority order, refined in backlog refinement.

    At/before the start of each sprint

    Daily Stand-Up (SM & Delivery Team): Coordinate the team to communicate progress and identify any roadblocks as quickly as possible. This meeting should be kept to fifteen minutes. Longer conversations are tabled for a separate meeting. These are called "stand-ups" because attendees should stay standing for the duration, which helps keep the meeting short and focused. The questions each team member should answer at each meeting: What did I do since last stand-up? What will I do before the next stand-up? Do I have any roadblocks?

    Every day during the sprint

    Sprint Demo (PO, SM, Delivery Team & Stakeholders): Review and demonstrate the work completed in the sprint with the business (demonstrate working and tested code which was developed during the sprint and gather stakeholder feedback).

    At the end of each sprint

    Sprint Retrospective (SM & Delivery Team & PO): Discuss how the sprint worked to determine if anything can be changed to improve team efficiency. The intent of this meeting is not to find/place blame for things that went wrong, but instead to find ways to avoid/alleviate pain points.

    At the end of each sprint

    Sample delivery sprint calendar

    The following calendar illustrates a two-week Scrum cadence (including ceremonies). This diagram is for illustrative purposes only. The length of the sprint and timing of ceremonies may differ from delivery team to delivery team based on their needs and schedules.

    An image of a sample sprint delivery calendar

    Sample delivery sprint calendar

    The following calendar illustrates a three-week Scrum cadence (including ceremonies). This diagram is for illustrative purposes only. The length of the sprint and timing of ceremonies may differ from delivery team to delivery team based on their needs and schedules.

    An image of a sample sprint delivery calendar

    Ensure your teams have the right information

    Implement and enforce your definition of ready at each stage of planning. Ensure your teams understand the required tasks by clarifying the definition of done.*

    Ready

    Done
    • The request has a defined problem, and the value is understood.
    • The request is documented, and the owner is identified.
    • Business and IT roles are committed to participating in estimation and planning activities.
    • Estimates and plans are made and validated with IT teams and business representatives.
    • Stakeholders and decision makers accept the estimates and plans as well as the related risks.
    • Estimates and plans are documented and slated for future review.

    * Note that your definitions of ready and done may vary from project to project, and they should be decided on collectively by the delivery team at the beginning of the project (part of setting their "norms") and updated if/when needed.

    Exercise 2.1.4 (Optional) Create definition of ready and done for an oil change

    10-15 minutes

    Step 1:

    1. As a group, create a definition of ready and done for doing an oil change (this will help you to understand the nature and value of a definition of ready and done using a relatable example):

    Definition of Ready

    Checklist:

    Definition of Done

    Checklist – For each user story:

    The checklist of things that must be true/done to begin the oil change.

    • We have the customer's car and keys
    • We know which grade of oil the customer wants

    The checklist of things that must be true/done at the end of the oil change.

    • The oil has been changed
    • A reminder sticker has been placed on windshield

    Exercise 2.1.4 (Optional) Create your prototype definitions of ready

    30-60 minutes

    Step 2:

    1. As a group, review the two sample definitions of ready below and select the one you consider to be the best starting point for your prototype definition of ready.

    Definition of Ready SAMPLE 1:

    Checklist – For each user story:

    • Technical and business risks are identified.
    • Resources are available for development.
    • Story has been assigned to a sprint/iteration.
    • Organizational business value is defined.
    • A specific user has been identified.
    • Stakeholders and needs defined.
    • Process impacts are identified.
    • Data needs are defined.
    • Business rules and non-functional requirements are identified.
    • Acceptance criteria are ready.
    • UI design work is ready.
    • Story has been traced to the project, epic, and sprint goal.

    Definition of Ready SAMPLE 2:

    Checklist – For each user story:

    • The value of story to the user is clearly indicated.
    • The acceptance criteria for story have been clearly described.
    • User story dependencies identified.
    • User story sized by delivery team.
    • Scrum team accepts user experience artifacts.
    • Performance criteria identified, where appropriate.
    • Person who will accept the user story is identified.
    • The team knows how to demo the story.

    Output

    • Prototype definitions of ready and done for your organization

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Exercise 2.1.4 (Optional) Create your prototype definitions of ready

    30-60 minutes

    Step 3:

    1. As a group, using the selected sample as your starting point, decide what changes need to be made (keep/add/delete/modify):

    Definition of Ready Checklist – For each user story:

    Disposition

    The value of story to the user is clearly indicated.

    Keep as is

    The acceptance criteria for story have been clearly described. Keep as is
    User story dependencies identified. Modify to: "Story has been traced to the project, epic, and sprint goal"
    User story sized by delivery team. Modify to: "User Stories have been sized by the Delivery team using Story Points"
    Scrum team accepts user experience artifacts. Keep as is
    Performance criteria identified, where appropriate. Keep as is
    Person who will accept the user story is identified.

    Delete

    The team knows how to demo the story. Keep as is

    Add: "Any performance related criteria have been identified where appropriate"

    Add: "Any data model related changes have been identified where needed"

    Output

    • Prototype definitions of ready and done for your organization

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Exercise 2.1.4 (Optional) Create your prototype definitions of ready

    30-60 minutes

    Step 4:

    1. As a group, capture and agree on your prototype definition of ready*:

    Definition of Ready

    Checklist – For each user story:

    User stories and related requirements contain clear descriptions of what is expected of a given functionality. Business value is identified.

    • The value of the story to the user is clearly indicated.
    • The acceptance criteria for the story have been clearly described.
    • Story has been traced to the project, epic, and sprint goal.
    • User stories have been sized by the delivery team using story points.
    • Scrum team accepts user experience artifacts.
    • Performance criteria identified, where appropriate.
    • The team knows how to demo the story.
    • Any performance-related criteria have been identified where appropriate.
    • Any data-model-related changes have been identified where needed.

    Record the results in the Roadmap for Transition to Agile Template

    * This checklist helps Agile teams determine if the stories in their backlog are ready for sprint planning. As your team gains experience with Agile, tailor this list to your needs and follow it until the practice becomes second nature.

    Output

    • Prototype definitions of ready and done for your organization

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Exercise 2.1.5 (Optional) Create your prototype definitions of done

    30-60 minutes

    Step 5:

    1. As a group, review the two sample definitions of ready below and select the one you consider to be the best starting point for your prototype definition of ready:

    SAMPLE 1:

    Definition of Done Checklist – For each user story:

    • Design complete
    • Code compiles
    • Static code analysis has been performed and passed
    • Peer reviewed with coding standards passed
    • Code merging completed
    • Unit tests and smoke tests are done/functional (preferably automated)
    • Meets the steps identified in the user story
    • Unit & QA test passed
    • Usability testing completed
    • Passes functionality testing including security testing
    • Data validation has been completed
    • Ready to be released to the next stage

    SAMPLE 2:

    Definition of Done Checklist – For each user story:

    • Work was completed in a way that a professional would say they are satisfied with their work.
    • Work has been seen by multiple team members.
    • Work meets the criteria of satisfaction described by the customer.
    • The work is part of a package that will be shared with the customer as soon as possible.
    • The work and any learnings from doing the work have been documented.
    • Completion of the work is known by and visible to all team members.
    • The work has passed all quality, security, and completeness checks as defined by the team.

    Output

    • Prototype definitions of ready and done for your organization

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Exercise 2.1.4 (Optional) Create your prototype definitions of done

    30-60 minutes

    Step 6:

    1. As a group, using the selected sample as your starting point, decide what changes need to be made (keep/add/delete/modify):

    Definition of Ready Checklist – For each user story:

    Disposition

    • Work was completed in a way that a professional would say they are satisfied with their work.
    Keep as is
    • Work has been seen by multiple team members.
    Delete
    • Work meets the criteria of satisfaction described by the customer.
    Modify to: "All acceptance criteria for the user story have been met"
    • The work is a part of a package that will be shared with the customer as soon as possible.
    Modify to: "The user story is ready to be demonstrated to Stakeholders"
    • The work and any learnings from doing the work has been documented.
    Keep as is
    • Completion of the work is known by and visible to all team members.
    Keep as is
    • The work has passed all quality, security, and completeness checks as defined by the team.
    Modify to: "Unit, smoke and regression testing has been performed (preferably automated), all tests were passed"
    Add: "Any performance related criteria associated with the story have been met"

    Output

    • Prototype definitions of ready and done for your organization

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Exercise 2.1.4 (Optional) Create your prototype definitions of done

    30-60 minutes

    Step 7:

    1. As a group, capture and agree on your prototype Definition of Done*:

    Definition of Done

    Checklist – For each user story:

    When the user story is accepted by the product owner and is ready to be released.

    • Work was completed in a way that a professional would say they are satisfied with their work.
    • All acceptance criteria for the user story have been met.
    • The user story is ready to be demonstrated to stakeholders.
    • The work and any learnings from doing the work have been documented.
    • Completion of the work is known by and visible to all team members.
    • Unit, smoke, and regression testing has been performed (preferably automated), and all tests were passed.
    • Any performance-related criteria associated with the story have been met.

    Record the results in the Roadmap for Transition to Agile Template

    * This checklist helps Agile teams determine if the stories in their backlog are ready for sprint planning. As your team gains experience with Agile, tailor this list to your needs and follow it until the practice becomes second nature.

    Output

    • Prototype definitions of ready and done for your organization

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Getting to "Agile DevOps Nirvana" is hard, but it's worth it.

    An image of the trail to climb Mount Everest, from camps 1-4

    Agile DevOps is a progression of cultural, behavioral, and process changes.
    It takes time.

    An image of the trail to climb Mount Everest, with the camps replaced by the steps to deploy Agile, to reach Agile/Devops Nirvana

    Agile DevOps may be hard, but it's worth it…

    It turns out Waterfall is not as good at reducing risk and ensuring delivery after all.

    CHAOS RESOLUTION BY AGILE VERSUS WATERFALL
    Size Method Successful Challenged Failed
    All Size Projects Agile 39% 52% 9%
    Waterfall 11% 60% 29%

    Standish Group; CHAOS REPORT 2015

    "I believe in this [Waterfall] concept, but the implementation described above is risky and invites failure."

    – Winston W. Royce

    Compare Waterfall to Agile

    Waterfall

    Agile

    Roles and Responsibilities

    Silo your resources

    Defined/segregated responsibilities

    Handoffs between siloes via documents

    Avoid siloes

    Collective responsibility

    Transitions instead of handoffs

    Belief System

    Trust the process

    Assign tasks to individuals

    Trust the delivery team

    Assign ownership/responsibilities to the team

    Planning Approach

    Create a detailed plan before work begins

    Follow the plan

    High level planning only

    The plan evolves over project lifetime

    Delivery Approach

    One and done (big bang delivery at end of project)

    Iterative delivery (regularly demonstrate working code)

    Governance Approach

    Phases and gates

    Artifacts and approvals

    Demo working tested code and get stakeholder feedback

    Support delivery team and eliminate roadblocks

    Approach to Stakeholders

    Involved at beginning and end of project

    "Arm's length" relationship with delivery team

    Involved throughout project (sprint by sprint)

    Closely involved with delivery team (through full time PO)

    Approach to Requirements/Scope

    One-time requirements gathering at start of project

    Scope is fixed at beginning of project ("carved in stone")

    On going requirements gathering and refinement over time

    Scope is roughly determined at beginning (expect change)

    Approach to Changing Requirements

    Treats change like it is "bad"

    Onerous CM process (discourages change)

    Scope changes "require approval" and are disruptive

    Accepts change as natural part of development.

    Light Change Management process (change is welcome)

    Scope changes are handled like all changes

    Hybrid SDLC: Wagile/Agilfall/WaterScrumFall

    Valuable product delivered in multiple releases

    A picture of a hybrid waterfall - Agile approach.

    If moving directly from Waterfall to Agile is too much for your organization, this can be a valuable interim step (but it won't give you the full benefits of Agile, so be careful about getting stuck here).

    Exercise 2.1.6 Identify the challenges of implementing Agile in your organization

    30-60 minutes

    1. As a group, discuss:
      1. Why being Agile may be difficult in your organization?
      2. What are some of the roadblocks and speed bumps you may face?
      3. What incremental steps might the organization take toward becoming Agile?

    Record the results in the Roadmap for Transition to Agile Template

    Output

    • Why being Agile is hard in your organization

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Step 2.2

    Align teams with Agile fundamentals

    Activities

    2.2.1 Review the results of your Common Agile Challenges Survey (30-60 minutes)
    2.2.2 Align your support with your top five challenges

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Outcomes of this step

    • Identify your organization's biggest Agile pain points.

    Be aware of common Agile challenges

    The road to Agile is filled with potholes, speedbumps, roadblocks, and brick walls!

    1. Establish an effective product owner role (PO)
    2. Uncertainty about minimum viable product (MVP)
    3. How non-Agile teams (like architecture, infosec, operations, etc.) work with Agile teams
    4. Project governance/gating process
    5. What is the role of a PM/PMO in Agile?
    6. How to budget/plan Agile projects
    7. How to contract and work with an Agile vendor
    8. An Agile skills deficit (e.g. new-to-Agile teams who have difficulty "doing Agile right")
    9. General resistance to change in the organization
    10. Lack of Agile training, piloting, and coaching
    11. Different Agile approaches are used by different teams
    12. Backlog management and user story decomposition challenges
    13. Quality assurance challenges
    14. Hierarchical management practices and organization boundaries
    15. Difficulty with establishing autonomous Agile teams
    16. Lack of management support for Agile
    17. Poor Agile estimation practices
    18. Difficulty creating effective product roadmaps in Agile
    19. How do we know when an Agile project is ready to go live?
    20. Sprint goals are not being consistently met, or sprint deliverables that are full of bugs

    Exercise 2.2.1 Review the results of your Common Agile Challenges Survey

    30-60 minutes

    1. Using the results of your Common Agile Challenges Survey, fill in the bar chart with your top five pain points:

    A screenshot from Common Agile Challenges Survey

    Output

    • Your organization's biggest Agile pain points identified and prioritized

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Exercise 2.2.2 Align your support with your top five challenges

    30 minutes

    Using the Agile Challenges support mapping on the following slides, build your transformation plan and supporting resources. You can build your plan by individual team results or as an enterprise approach.

    Priority Agile Challenge Module Name and Sequence
    1
    1. Agile Foundations
    2. ?
    2
    1. Agile Foundations
    2. ?
    3
    1. Agile Foundations
    2. ?
    4
    1. Agile Foundations
    2. ?
    5
    1. Agile Foundations
    2. ?

    Output

    • Your organization's Agile Challenges transformation plan

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Map challenges to supporting modules

    Agile Challenges

    Supporting Resources

    Difficulty establishing an effective product owner (PO) or uncertainty about the PO role

    Modules:

    • Agile Foundations
    • Establish an Effective Product Owner Role
    Uncertainty about minimum viable product (MVP) and how to identify your MVP

    Modules:

    • Agile Foundations
    • Simulate Effective Scrum Practices
    How non-Agile teams (like architecture, info sec, operations, etc.) work with Agile teams

    Modules:

    • Agile Foundations
    • Work With Non-Agile Teams (Future)
    Project Governance/Gating processes that are unfriendly to Agile

    Modules:

    • Agile Foundations
    • Establish Agile-Friendly Gating (Future)
    Uncertainty about the role of a PM/PMO in Agile

    Modules:

    • Agile Foundations
    • Understand the role of PM/PMO in Agile Delivery (Future)
    Uncertainty about how to budget/plan Agile projects

    Modules:

    • Agile Foundations
    • Simulate Effective Scrum Practices
    • Understand Budgeting and Funding for Agile Delivery (Future)
    Creating an Agile friendly RFP/Contract (e.g. how to contract and work with an Agile vendor)

    Modules:

    • Agile Foundations
    • Work Effectively with Agile Vendors (Future)

    Note: Modules listed as (Future) are in development and may be available in draft format.

    Map challenges to supporting modules

    Agile Challenges

    Supporting Resources

    An Agile skills deficit (e.g. new-to-Agile teams who have difficulty "doing Agile right")

    Modules:

    • Agile Foundations
    General resistance in the organization to process changes required by Agile

    Modules:

    • Agile Foundations
    • Manage Organizational Change to Support Agile Delivery (Future)
    Lack of Agile training, piloting and coaching being offered by the organization

    Modules:

    • Agile Foundations
    Different Agile approaches are used by different teams, making it difficult to work together

    Modules:

    • Agile Foundations
    • Build Your Scrum Playbook (Future)
    Backlog management challenges (e.g. how to manage a backlog, and make effective use of Epics, Features, User Stories, Tasks and Bugs)

    Modules:

    • Agile Foundations
    • Manage Your Backlog Effectively
    Quality Assurance challenges (testing not being done well on Agile projects)

    Modules:

    • Agile Foundations
    • Establish Effect Quality Assurance for Agile Delivery (Future);
    • Use Test Automation Effectively (Future)
    Hierarchical management practices and organization boundaries make it difficult to be Agile

    Modules:

    • Agile Foundations
    • Manage Organizational Change to Support Agile Delivery (Future)

    Note: Modules listed as (Future) are in development and may be available in draft format.

    Map challenges to supporting modules

    Agile Challenges

    Supporting Resources

    Difficulty with establishing autonomous Agile teams (self managing, cross functional teams that are empowered by the organization to deliver)

    Modules:

    • Agile Foundations
    • Manage Organizational Change to Support Agile Delivery (Future)
    Lack of management support for Agile

    Modules:

    • Agile Foundations
    • Manage Organizational Change to Support Agile Delivery (Future)
    Poor understanding of Agile estimation techniques and how to apply them effectively

    Modules:

    • Agile Foundations
    • Estimation Module
    Difficulty creating effective product roadmaps in Agile

    Modules:

    • Agile Foundations
    • Product Roadmapping Tool
    How do we know when an Agile project is ready to go live

    Modules:

    • Agile Foundations
    • Decide When to Go Live (Future)
    Sprint goals are not being consistently met, or Sprint deliverables that are full of bugs

    Modules:

    • Agile Foundations
    • Establish Effect Quality Assurance for Agile Delivery (Future);
    • Use Test Automation Effectively (Future)

    Note: Modules listed as (Future) are in development and may be available in draft format.

    Map challenges to supporting blueprints

    Agile Challenges

    Supporting Resources

    Difficulty establishing an effective product owner (PO) or uncertainty about the PO role

    Blueprints: Build a Better Product Owner; Managing Requirements in an Agile Environment

    Uncertainty about minimum viable product (MVP) and how to identify your MVP

    Blueprints: Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision; Managing Requirements in an Agile Environment

    How non-Agile teams (like architecture, info sec, operations, etc.) work with Agile teams

    Blueprints: Create a Horizontally Optimized SDLC to Better Meet Business Demands, Extend Agile Practices Beyond IT, Implement DevOps Practices That Work; Build Your BizDevOps Playbook, Embed Security into the DevOps Pipeline

    Project Governance/Gating processes that are unfriendly to Agile

    Blueprints: Streamline Your Management Process to Drive Performance, Drive Business Value With a Right-Sized Project Gating Process

    Uncertainty about the role of a PM/PMO in Agile

    Blueprints: Define the Role of Project Management in Agile and Product-Centric Delivery, Create a Horizontally Optimized SDLC to Better Meet Business Demands

    Uncertainty about how to budget/plan Agile projects

    Blueprints: Identify and Reduce Agile Contract Risk

    Creating an Agile friendly RFP/Contract (e.g. how to contract and work with an Agile vendor)

    Blueprints: Identify and Reduce Agile Contract Risk

    Note: Modules listed as (Future) are in development and may be available in draft format.

    Map challenges to supporting blueprints

    Agile Challenges

    Supporting Resources

    An Agile skills deficit (e.g. new-to-Agile teams who have difficulty "doing Agile right")

    Blueprints: Perform an Agile Skills Assessment; Mentoring for Agile Teams

    General resistance in the organization to process changes required by Agile

    Blueprints: Master Organizational Change Management Practices

    Lack of Agile training, piloting and coaching being offered by the organization

    Blueprints: Perform an Agile Skills Assessment; Mentoring for Agile Teams

    Different Agile approaches are used by different teams, making it difficult to work together

    Blueprints: Create a Horizontally Optimized SDLC to Better Meet Business Demands, Extend Agile Practices Beyond IT

    Backlog management challenges (e.g. how to manage a backlog, and make effective use of epics, features, user stories, tasks and bugs)

    Blueprints: Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision, Managing Requirements in an Agile Environment

    Quality Assurance challenges (testing not being done well on Agile projects)

    Blueprints: Build a Software Quality Assurance Program, Automate Testing to Get More Done

    Hierarchical management practices and organization boundaries make it difficult to be Agile

    Blueprints: Master Organizational Change Management Practices

    Map challenges to supporting blueprints

    Agile Challenges

    Supporting Resources

    Difficulty with establishing autonomous Agile teams (self managing, cross functional teams that are empowered by the organization to deliver)

    Blueprints: Master Organizational Change Management Practices

    Lack of management support for Agile

    Blueprints: Master Organizational Change Management Practices

    Poor understanding of Agile estimation techniques and how to apply them effectively

    Blueprints: Estimate Software Delivery with Confidence, Managing Requirements in an Agile Environment

    Difficulty creating effective product roadmaps in Agile

    Blueprints: Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision

    How do we know when an Agile project is ready to go live

    Blueprints: Optimize Applications Release Management,Drive Business Value With a Right-Sized Project Gating Process, Managing Requirements in an Agile Environment

    Sprint goals are not being consistently met, or sprint deliverables that are full of bugs

    Blueprints: Build a Software Quality Assurance Program, Automate Testing to Get More Done, Managing Requirements in an Agile Environment

    Step 2.3

    Move stepwise to iterative Agile delivery (Optional)

    Activities

    2.3.1 (Optional) Identify a hypothetical project
    2.3.2 (Optional) Capture your traditional delivery approach
    2.3.3 (Optional) Consider what a two-phase delivery looks like
    2.3.4 (Optional) Consider what a four-phase delivery looks like
    2.3.5 (Optional) Consider what a four-phase delivery with monthly sprints looks like
    2.3.6 (Optional) Decide on your target state and the steps required to get there

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Outcomes of this step

    • Understand the changes that must take place in your organization to support a more Agile delivery approach.

    Moving stepwise from traditional to Agile

    Your transition to Agile and more frequent releases doesn't need to be all at once. Organizations may find it easier to build toward smaller iterations.

    An image of the stepwise approach to adopting Agile.

    Exercise 2.3.1 (Optional) Identify a hypothetical project

    15-30 minutes

    1. As a group, consider some typical, large, mission-critical system deliveries your organization has done in the past (name a few as examples).
    2. Imagine a project like this has been assigned to your team, and the plan calls for delivering the system using your traditional delivery approach and taking two years to complete.
    3. Give this imaginary project a name (e.g. traditional project, our project).

    Name of your imaginary 2-year long project:

    e.g. Big Bang ERP

    Brief Project Description:

    e.g. Replace home-grown legacy ERP with a modern COTS product in a single release scheduled to be delivered in 24 months

    Record this in the Roadmap for Transition to Agile Template

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    For best results, complete these sub-exercises with representatives from as many functional areas as possible
    (e.g. stakeholders, project management, business analysis, development, testing, operations, architecture, infosec)

    Output

    • An imaginary delivery project that is expected to take 2 years to complete

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Exercise 2.3.2 (Optional) Capture your traditional delivery approach

    30 minutes

    1. As a group, discuss and capture the high-level steps followed (after project approval) in your traditional delivery approach using the table below and on the next page.

    Step

    Description

    Who is involved

    1
    • Gather detailed requirements (work with project stakeholders to capture all requirements of the system and produce a Detailed Requirements Document)

    PM, Business Analysts, Stakeholders, etc.

    2
    • Produce a Detailed Design Document (develop a design that will meet all requirements identified in the Detailed Requirements Document)
    • Produce a Detailed Test Plan for acceptance of the system
    • Produce a Detailed Project Plan for the system delivery
    • Perform threat and privacy assessment (using the detailed requirements and design documents, perform a Threat Risk Assessment and Privacy Impact Analysis)
    • Submit detailed design to Architecture Review Board
    • Provide Operations with full infrastructure requirements
    PM, Architects, InfoSec, ARB, Operations, etc.
    3
    • Develop software (follow the Detailed Design Document and develop a system which meets all requirements)
    • Perform Unit Testing on all modules of the system as they are developed
    PM, Developers, etc.
    4
    • Create Production Environment based on project specification
    • Perform Integration testing of all modules to ensure the system works as designed
    • Produce an Integration Test Report capturing the results of testing and any deficiencies
    PM, Testers, etc.
    5
    • Fix all Sev 1 and Sev 2 deficiencies found during Integration Testing
    • Perform regression testing
    • Perform User Acceptance Testing as per the Detailed Test Plan
    PM, Developers, Testers, Stakeholders, etc.
    6
    • Product Deployment Plan
    • Perform User and Operations Training
    • Produce updated Threat Risk Assessment and Privacy Impact Analysis
    • Seek CAB (Change Approval Board) approval to go live
    PM, Developers, Testers, Operations, InfoSec, CAB, etc.
    7
    • Close out and Lessons Learned
    • Verify value delivery
    PM, etc.

    Output

    • The high-level steps in your current (traditional) delivery approach and who is involved in each step

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Exercise 2.3.2 (Optional) Capture your traditional delivery approach

    Step

    Description

    Who is involved

    1
    • Gather detailed requirements (work with project stakeholders to capture all requirements of the system and produce a Detailed Requirements Document)

    PM, Business Analysts, Stakeholders, etc.

    2
    • Produce a Detailed Design Document (develop a design that will meet all requirements identified in the Detailed Requirements Document)
    • Produce a Detailed Test Plan for acceptance of the system
    • Produce a Detailed Project Plan for the system delivery
    • Perform threat and privacy assessment (using the detailed requirements and design documents, perform a Threat Risk Assessment and Privacy Impact Analysis)
    • Submit detailed design to Architecture Review Board
    • Provide Operations with full infrastructure requirements
    PM, Architects, InfoSec, ARB, Operations, etc.
    3
    • Develop software (follow the Detailed Design Document and develop a system which meets all requirements)
    • Perform Unit Testing on all modules of the system as they are developed
    PM, Developers, etc.
    4
    • Create Production Environment based on project specification
    • Perform Integration testing of all modules to ensure the system works as designed
    • Produce an Integration Test Report capturing the results of testing and any deficiencies
    PM, Testers, etc.
    5
    • Fix all Sev 1 and Sev 2 deficiencies found during Integration Testing
    • Perform regression testing
    • Perform User Acceptance Testing as per the Detailed Test Plan
    PM, Developers, Testers, Stakeholders, etc.
    6
    • Product Deployment Plan
    • Perform User and Operations Training
    • Produce updated Threat Risk Assessment and Privacy Impact Analysis
    • Seek CAB (Change Approval Board) approval to go live
    PM, Developers, Testers, Operations, InfoSec, CAB, etc.
    7
    • Close out and Lessons Learned
    • Verify value delivery
    PM, etc.

    Output

    • The high-level steps in your current (traditional) delivery approach and who is involved in each step

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Exercise 2.3.3 (Optional) Consider what a two-phase delivery looks like

    30 minutes

    1. As a group, imagine that project stakeholders tell you two years is too long to wait for the project, and they want to know if they can have something (even if it's not the whole thing) in production sooner.
    2. Now imagine that you are able to convince the stakeholders to work with you to do the following:
      1. Identify their most important project requirements.
      2. Work with you to describe a valuable subset of the project requirements which reflect about ½ of all features they need (call this Phase 1).
      3. Work with you to get this Phase 1 of the project into production in about 1 year.
      4. Agree to leave the remaining requirements (e.g. the less important ones) until Phase 2 (second year of project).
    3. As a group, identify:
      1. How hard this would be for your organization to do, on a scale of 1 to 10.
      2. Identify what changes are needed to make this happen (consider people, processes, and technology).
      3. Capture your results using the table on the following slide.

    Output

    • The high-level steps in your current (traditional) delivery approach and who is involved in each step

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Exercise 2.3.3 (Optional) Consider what a two-phase delivery looks like

    30 minutes

    1. What would be needed to let you deliver a two-year project in two one-year phases considering people, process, and technology?

    People

    Processes

    Technology

    • e.g. Stakeholders would need to make hard decisions about which features are more valuable/important than others (and stick to them)
    • e.g. Delivery team and stakeholders would need to work closely together to determine what is a feasible and valuable set of features which can go live in Phase 1
    • e.g. Operations will need to be prepared to support Phase 1 (earlier than before), and then support an updated system after Phase 2
    • e.g. No significant change to traditional processes other than delivering in two phases
    • e.g. Need to decide whether requirements for the full project need to be gathered up front, or do you just do Phase 1, and then Phase 2
    • e.g. No significant changes other than we need a production environment sooner, and infrastructure requirements for the full project may be different from what is needed just for Phase 1

    How difficult would this be to achieve in your organization? (1-easy, 10-next to impossible)

    e.g. 2

    Output

    • Understand how your organization would deliver a large project in two phases

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Exercise 2.3.4 (Optional) Consider what a four-phase delivery looks like

    30 minutes

    1. Now, imagine that project stakeholders tell you that even one year is still too long to wait for something of value in production, and they want to know if they can have something (even if it's not the whole thing) in production sooner.
    2. Now imagine that you are able to convince the stakeholders to work with you to do the following:
      1. From the "Phase 1" requirements in Exercise 2.3.3, they will identify the most important ones that they need first.
      2. They will work with you to describe a valuable subset of these project requirements which reflect about ½ of all features they need (call this Phase 1A).
      3. They will work with you to get this Phase 1A of the project into production in about six months.
      4. Agree to leave all the remaining requirements (e.g. the less important ones) until later phases.
    1. As a group, identify:
      1. How hard this would be for your organization to do, on a scale of 1 to 10?
      2. Identify what changes are needed to make this happen (consider people, processes, and technology).
      3. Capture your results using the table on the following slide.

    Output

    • Understand how your organization would deliver a large project in two phases

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Exercise 2.3.4 (Optional) Consider what a four-phase delivery looks like

    30 minutes

    1. What more would be needed to let you deliver a two-year project in four, six-month phases considering people, process, and technology?

    People

    Processes

    Technology

    • e.g. Stakeholders would need to make even harder (and faster) decisions about which features are most valuable/important than others.
    • e.g. Because we will be delivering releases so quickly, we'll ask the stakeholders to nominate a "primary contact" who can make decisions on requirements for each phase (also to answer questions from the project team, when needed, so they aren't slowed down).
    • e.g. Delivery team and the "primary contact" would work closely together to determine what is a feasible and valuable set of features to go live within Phase 1A, and then repeat this for the remaining Phases.
    • e.g. Operations will need to be prepared to support Phase 1A (even earlier than before), and then support the remaining phases. Ask them to dedicate someone as primary contact for this series of releases, and who provides guidance/support as needed.

    e.g. Heavy and time-consuming process steps (e.g. architecture reviews, data modelling, infosec approvals, change approval board) will need to be streamlined and made more "iteration-friendly."

    e.g. Gather detailed requirements only for Phase 1A, and leave the rest as high-level requirements to be more fully defined at the beginning of each subsequent phase.

    • e.g. We will need (at a minimum) a Production, and a Pre-production environment set up (and earlier in the project lifecycle) and solid regression testing at the end of each phase to ensure the latest Release doesn't break anything.
    • e.g. Since we will be going into production multiple times over this 2-year project, we should consider using automation (e.g. automated build, automated regression testing, and automated deployment).

    How difficult would this be to achieve in your organization? (1-easy, 10-next to impossible)

    e.g. 5

    Output

    • Understand how your organization would deliver a large project in two phases

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Exercise 2.3.5 (Optional) Consider what a four-phase delivery with monthly sprints looks like

    30 minutes

    1. Now, imagine that project stakeholders tell you that they are happy with the six-month release approach (e.g. expect to go live four times over the two-year project, with each release providing increased functionality), but they want to see your team's progress frequently between releases.
    2. Additionally, stakeholders tell you that instead of asking you to provide the traditional monthly project status reports, they want you to demonstrate whatever features you have built and work for the system on a monthly basis. This will be done in the form of a demonstration to a selected list of stakeholders each month.
    3. Each month, your team must show working, tested code (not prototypes or mockups, unless asked for) and demonstrate how this month's deliverable brings value to the business.
    4. Furthermore, the stakeholders would like to be able to test out the system each month, so they can play with it, test it, and provide feedback to your team about what they like and what they feel needs to change.
    5. To help you to achieve this, the stakeholders designate their primary contact as the "product owner" (PO) who will be dedicated to the project and will help your team to decide what is being delivered each month. The PO will be empowered by the stakeholders to make decisions on scope and priority on an expedited basis and will also answer questions on their behalf when your team needs guidance.
    6. You agree with the stakeholders these one-month deliverables will be called "sprints."

    Output

    • Understand how your organization would deliver a large project in two phases

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Exercise 2.3.5 (Optional) Consider what a four-phase delivery with monthly sprints looks like

    30 minutes

    1. What more would be needed to let you deliver a two-year project in 24 one-month sprints (plus four six-month releases) considering people, process, and technology?

    People

    Processes

    Technology

    • e.g. The team will need to work closely with the product owner (and/or stakeholders) on a continuous basis to understand requirements and their relative priority
    • e.g. Stakeholders will need to be available for demos and testing at the end of each sprint, and provide feedback to the team as quickly as possible
    • e.g. all functional siloes within IT (e.g. analysts, architects, infosec, developers, testers, operations) will need to work hand in hand on a continuous basis to deliver working tested code into a demo/test environment at the end of each sprint
    • e.g. there isn't enough time in each sprint to have team members working in siloes, instead, we will need to work together as a team to ensure that all aspects of the sprint (requirements, design, build, test, etc.) are worked on as needed (team is equally and collectively responsible for delivery of each sprint)
    • e.g. We can't deliver much in 1-month sprints if we work in siloes and are expected to do traditional documentation and handoffs (e.g. requirements document), so we will use a fluid project backlog instead of requirements documents, we will evolve our design iteratively over the course of the many sprints, and we will need to streamline the CAB process to allow for faster (more frequent) deployments
    • e.g. We will need to evolve the system's data model iteratively over the course of many sprints (rather than a one-and-done approach at the beginning of the project)
    • e.g. We will need to quickly decide the scope to be delivered in each sprint (focusing on highest value functionality first). Each sprint should have a well-defined "goal" that the team is trying to achieve
    • We will need any approval processes (e.g. architecture review, infosec review, CAB approval) to be streamlined and simplified in order to support more frequent and iterative deployment of the system
    • e.g. We will need to maximize our use of automation (build, test, and deploy) in order to maximize what we can deliver in each sprint (Note: the ROI on automation is much higher when we deliver in sprints than in a one-and-done delivery because we are iterating repeatedly over the course of the project
    • e.g. We will need to quickly stand-up environments (dev, test, prod, etc.) and to make changes/enhancements to these environments quickly (it makes sense to leverage infrastructure as a service [IaaS] techniques here)
    • e.g. We will need to automate our security related testing (e.g. static and dynamic security testing, penetration testing, etc.) so that it can be run repeatedly before each release moves into production. We may need to evolve this automated testing with each sprint depending on what new features/functions are being delivered in each release

    How difficult would this be to achieve in your organization? (1-easy, 10-next to impossible)

    e.g. 8

    Output

    • Understand how your organization would deliver a large project in two phases

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Exercise 2.3.6 (Optional) Define the steps to reach your target state

    30 minutes

    1. From Exercises 2.3.1-2.3.5, identify your current state on the stepwise transition from traditional to Agile (e.g. one-and-done).
    2. Then, identify your desired future state (e.g. 24 one-month sprints with six-month releases).
    3. Now, review your people, process, and technology changes identified in Exercises 2.3.1-2.3.5 and create a roadmap for this transition using the table on the next slide.

    Identify your current state from Exercises 2.3.1-2.3.5

    e.g. One-and-done

    Identify your desired state from Exercises 2.3.1-2.3.5

    e.g. 24x1 Month Sprints

    Output

    • A roadmap and timeline for adopting a more Agile delivery approach

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Exercise 2.3.6 (Optional) Define the steps to reach your target state

    30 minutes

    1. Fill in the table below with your next steps. Identify who will be responsible for each step along with the timeline for completion: "Now" refers to steps you will take in the immediate future (e.g. days to weeks), "Next" refers to steps you will take in the medium term (e.g. weeks to months), and "Later" refers to long-term items (e.g. months to years).

    Now

    Next Later

    What are you going to do now?

    What are you going to do very soon?

    What are you going to do in the future?

    Roadmap Item

    Who

    Date

    Roadmap Item

    Who

    Date

    Roadmap Item

    Who

    Date

    Work with Stakeholders to identify a product owner for the project.

    AC

    Jan 1

    Break down full deliverable into 4 phases with high level requirements for each phase

    DL

    Feb 15

    Work with operations to set up Dev, Test, Pre-Prod, and Prod environments for first phase (make use of automation/scripting)

    DL

    Apr 15

    Work with PO and stakeholders to help them understand Agile approach

    Jan 15

    Work with PO to create a project backlog for the first phase deliverable

    JK

    Feb 28

    Work with QA group to select and implement test automation for the project (start with smoke and regression tests)

    AC

    Apr 30

    Work with project gating body, architecture, infosec and operations to agree on incremental deliveries for the project and streamlined activities to get there

    AC

    Mar 15

    Record the results in the Roadmap for Transition to Agile Template

    Output

    • A roadmap and timeline for adopting a more Agile delivery approach

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Step 2.4

    Identify insights and team feedback

    Activities

    2.4.1 Identify key insights and takeaways
    2.4.2 Perform an exit survey

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Outcomes of this step

    • Identify your key insights and takeaways from Phase 2

    Exercise 2.4.1 Identify key insights and takeaways

    30 minutes

    1. As a group, discuss and capture your thoughts on:
      1. What key insights have participants gained from the intro to Agile presentation?
      2. What if any takeaways do participants feel are needed as a result of the presentation?
      3. What changes need to be made in the organization to support/enhance Agile adoption?
    2. Capture your findings in the table below:
    What key insights have you gained? What takeaways have you identified?
    • (e.g. better understanding of Agile mindset, principles, and practices)
    • (e.g. how you can improve/spread Agile practices in the organization)

    Output

    • A better understanding of Agile principles and practices
    • Action items that will help solidify Agile practices in the organization

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Exercise 2.4.2 Perform an exit survey

    30 minutes

    1. Wrap up this section by addressing any remaining questions participants still have.
    2. Create your local exit survey by copying the template using the link below. Then copy and distribute your local survey link.
    3. Collect the consolidated survey results in preparation for your next steps.
    4. NOTE: Using this survey template requires having access to Microsoft Forms. If you cannot access Microsoft Forms, an Info-Tech analyst can send the survey for you. Alternatively, this survey can be done with sticky notes and a pen and paper to calculate the outcomes.

    Download Survey Template:

    Develop Your Agile Approach Exit Survey Template

    Output

    • A better understanding of Agile principles and practices
    • Action items that will help solidify Agile practices in the organization

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Agile Modules

    Prioritize Agile support with your top challenges

    Backlog Management

    Scrum Simulation

    Estimation

    Product Owner

    Product Roadmapping

    1: User stories and the art of decomposition

    2: Effective backlog management & refinement

    3: Identify insights and team feedback

    1: Scrum sprint planning and retrospective simulation

    2: Pass the balls – sprint velocity game

    1: Improve product backlog item estimation

    2: Agile estimation fundamentals

    3: Understand the wisdom of crowds

    4: Identify insights and team feedback

    1: Understand product management fundamentals

    2: The critical role of the product owner

    3: Manage effective product backlogs and roadmaps

    4: Identify insights and team feedback

    1: Identify your product roadmapping pains

    2: The six "tools" of product roadmapping

    3: Product roadmapping exercise

    Organizations often struggle with numerous pain points around Agile delivery.
    The Common Agile Challenges Survey results will help you identify and prioritize the organization's biggest (most cited) pain points. Treat these pain points like a backlog and address the biggest ones first.

    Agile modules provide supporting activities:
    Each module provides guidance and supporting activities related to a specific Agile challenge from your survey. These modules can be arranged to meet each organization's or team's needs while providing cohesive and consistent messaging. For additional supporting research, please visit the Agile / DevOps Resource Center.
    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Backlog Management Module

    Manage your backlog effectively

    Activities

    Backlog 1.1 Identify your backlog and user story decomposition pains
    Backlog 1.2 What are user stories and why do we use them?
    Backlog 1.3 User story decomposition: password reset
    Backlog 1.4 (Optional) Decompose a real epic

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Outcomes of this step

    • A better understanding of backlog management and user story decomposition.

    Backlog Exercise 1.1 Identify your backlog and user story decomposition pains

    30-60 minutes

    1. As a group, discuss and capture your thoughts on:
      1. What specific challenges you are facing with backlog management
      2. What specific challenges you are facing with user story decomposition
    1. Capture your findings in the table below:

    What are your specific backlog management and user story decomposition challenges?

    • (e.g. We have trouble telling the difference between epics, features, user stories, and tasks)
    • (e.g. We often don't finish all user stories in a sprint because some of them turn out to be too big to complete in one sprint)

    Output

    • Your specific backlog management and user story decomposition challenges

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    User stories and the art of decomposition

    User stories are core to Agile delivery.

    Good user story decomposition practices are key to doing Agile effectively.

    Agile doesn't use traditional "shoulds" and "shalls" to capture requirements

    Backlog Exercise 1.2 What are user stories and why do we use them?

    30-60 minutes

    1. User stories are a simple way of capturing requirements in Agile and have the form:

    Why do we capture requirements as user stories (what value do they provide)?

    How do they differ from traditional (should/shall) requirements (and are they better)?

    What else stands out to you about user stories?

    as a someone I want something so that achieve something.

    Example:
    As a banking customer, I want to see the current balance of my accounts so that I can know how much money I have in each account.

    Output

    • A better understanding of user stories and why they are used in Agile delivery

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    User stories are "placeholders for conversations"

    User stories enable collaboration and conversations to fully determine actual business requirements over time.

    e.g. As a banking customer, I want to see the current balance of my accounts so that I can know how much money I have in each account.

    Requirements, determined within the iterations, outline the steps to complete the story: how the user will access their account, the types of funds allowed, etc.

    User stories allow the product owners to prioritize and manage the product needs (think of them as "virtual sticky notes").

    User stories come in different "sizes"

    These items form a four-level hierarchy: epics, features, user stories, and tasks.
    They are collectively referred to as product backlog items or (PBIs)

    A table with the following headings: Agile; Waterfall; Relationship; Definition

    The process of taking large PBIs (e.g. epics and features) and breaking them down in to small PBIs (e.g. user stories and tasks) is called user story decomposition and is often challenging for new-to-Agile teams

    Backlog Exercise 1.3 User story decomposition: password reset

    30-60 minutes

    1. As a group, consider the following feature, which describes a high-level requirement from a hypothetical system:
      • FEATURE: As a customer, I want to be able to set and reset my password, so that I can transact with the system securely.
    2. Imagine your delivery team tells you that this is user story is too large to complete in one sprint, so they have asked you to decompose it into smaller pieces. Work together to break this feature down into several smaller user stories:
    User Story 1: User Story 2: User Story 3:
    As A I Want So That. As A I Want So That. As A I Want So That.

    Output

    • An epic which has been decomposed into smaller user stories which can be completed independently

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Backlog Exercise 1.3 User story decomposition: password reset

    Epic: As a customer, I want to be able to set and reset my password, so that I can transact securely.

    A single epic can be broken down into multiple user stories

    User Story 1: User Story 2: User Story 3: User Story 4:
    This is a picture of user story 1 This is a picture of user story 2 This is a picture of user story 3 This is a picture of user story 4

    Acceptance Criteria:
    Given that the customer has a password that they want to change,
    When the administrator clicks reset password on the admin console,
    Then the system will change the password and send it to the user.

    Acceptance Criteria:
    Given that the customer has a password that they want to change,
    When they click reset password in the system,
    Then the system will allow them to choose a new password and will save it the password and send it to the user.

    Acceptance Criteria:
    Given that the customer has not logged onto the system before,
    When they initially log in,
    Then the system will prompt them to change their password.

    Acceptance Criteria:
    Given that a password is stored in the database,
    When anyone looks at the password field in the database,
    Then the actual password will not be visible or easily decrypted.

    Are enablers included in your backlogs? Should they be?

    An enabler is any support activity needed to provide the means for future functionality. Enablers build out the technical foundations (e.g. architecture) of the product and uphold technical quality standards.

    Your audience will dictate the level of detail and granularity you should include in your enabler, but it is a good rule of thumb to stick to the feature level.

    Enablers

    Description

    Enabler Epics

    Non-functional and other technical requirements that support your features (e.g. data and system requirements)

    Enabler Capabilities of Features

    Enabler Stories

    Consider the various types of enabler

    Exploration

    Architectural

    Any efforts toward learning customer or user needs and creation of solutions and alternatives. Exploration enablers are heavily linked to learning milestones.

    Any efforts toward building components of your architecture. These will often be linked to delivery teams other than your pure development team.

    Infrastructure

    Compliance

    Any efforts toward building various development and testing environments. Again, these are artifacts that will relate to other delivery teams.

    Any efforts toward regulatory and compliance requirements in your development activities. These can be both internal and external.

    Source: Scaled Agile, "Enablers."

    Create, split, and bundle your PBIs

    The following questions can be helpful in dissecting an epic down to the user story level. The same line of thinking can also be useful for bundling multiple small PBIs together.

    An image showing how to Create, split, and bundle your PBIs

    Backlog Exercise 1.4 (Optional)
    Decompose a real epic

    30 minutes

    1. As a group, select a real epic or feature from one of your project backlogs which needs to be decomposed:
    2. Work together to decompose this epic down into several smaller features and/or user stories (user stories must be small enough to reasonably be completed within a sprint):

    Epic to be decomposed:

    As a ____ I want _____ so that ______

    User Story 1: User Story 2: User Story 3:
    As A I Want So That. As A I Want So That. As A I Want So That.

    Output

    • A real epic from your project backlog which has been decomposed into smaller features and user stories

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Backlog Management Module

    Manage your backlog effectively

    Activities

    Backlog 2.1 Identify enablers and blockers

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Outcomes of this step

    • Backlog PBI filters.
    • A better understanding of backlog types and levels.

    Effective backlog management and refinement

    Working with a tiered backlog

    an image showing the backlog tiers: New Idea; Ideas; Qualified; Ready - sprint.

    Use a tiered approach to managing your backlog, and always work on the highest priority items first.

    Distinguish your specific goals for refining in the product backlog vs. planning for a sprint itself

    Often backlog refinement is used interchangeably or considered a part of sprint planning. The reality is they are very similar, as the required participants and objectives are the same however, there are some key differences.

    An image of a Venn diagram comparing Backlog Refinement to sprint Planning.

    A better way to view them is "pre-planning" and "planning."

    A backlog stores and organizes PBIs at various stages of readiness

    A well-formed backlog can be thought of as a DEEP backlog:

    • Detailed Appropriately: Product backlog items (PBIs) are broken down and refined as necessary.
    • Emergent: The backlog grows and evolves over time as PBIs are added and removed.
    • Estimated: The effort a PBI requires is estimated at each tier.
    • Prioritized: The PBIs value and priority are determined at each tier.

    (Perforce, 2018)

    An image showing the Ideas; Qualified; Ready; funnel leading to the sprint approach.

    Backlog tiers facilitate product planning steps

    An image of the product planning steps facilitated by Backlog Tiers

    Each activity is a variation of measuring value and estimating effort to validate and prioritize a PBI.

    A PBI meets our definition of done and passes through to the next backlog tier when it meets the appropriate criteria. Quality filters should exist between each tier.

    Backlog Exercise 2.1 Build a starting checklist of quality filters

    60 minutes

    1. Quality filters provide a checklist to ensure each Product Backlog Item (PBI) meets our definition of Done and is ready to move to the next backlog group (status).
    2. Create a checklist of basic descriptors that must be completed between each backlog level.
    3. If you completed this exercise in a different Module, review and update it here.
    4. Use this information to start your product strategy playbook in Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision.

    An image of the backlog tiers, identifying where product backlog and sprint backlog are

    Output

    • List of enablers and blockers to establishing product owners

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Outline the criteria to proceed to the next tier via quality filters

    Expand the concepts of defining "ready" and "done" to include the other stages of a PBIs journey through product planning.

    An image showing the approach you will use to Outline the criteria to proceed to the next tier via quality filters

    Info-Tech Insight: A quality filter ensures quality is met and teams are armed with the right information to work more efficiently and improve throughput.

    Define product value by aligning backlog delivery with roadmap goals

    In each product plan, the backlogs show what you will deliver. Roadmaps identify when and in what order you will deliver value, capabilities, and goals.

    Facilitator slides: Explaining MVP

    Notes and Instructions

    The primary intent of this exercise is to explain the complex notion of MVP (it is one of the most misunderstood and contentious issues in Agile delivery). The exercise is intended to explain it in a simple and digestible way that will fundamentally change participants' understanding of MVP.

    Note that the slide contains animations.

    Imagine that your stakeholder tells you they want a blue 4-door sedan (consider this our "MVP" at this point), and you decide to build it the traditional way. As you build it (tires, then frame, then body, then joint body with frame and install engine), the stakeholder doesn't have anything they can use, and so they are only happy (and able to get value) at the end when the entire car is finished (point out the stakeholder "faces" go from unhappy to happy in the end).
    Animation 1:
    When we use Agile methods, we don't want to wait until the end before we have something the stakeholders can use. So instead of waiting until the entire car is completed, we decide our first iteration will be to give the stakeholder "a simple (blue) wheeled transportation device"…namely a skateboard that they can use for a little while (it's not a car, but it is something the stakeholder can use to get places).
    Animation 2:
    After the stakeholder has tried out the skateboard, we ask for feedback. They tell us the skateboard helped them to get around faster than walking, but they don't like the fact that it is so hard to maintain your balance on it. So, we add a handle to the skateboard to turn it into a scooter. The stakeholder then uses the scooter for a while. Stakeholder feedback says staying balanced on the scooter is much easier, but they don't have a place to put groceries when they go shopping, so can we do something about that?
    (Continued on next slide…)

    Facilitator slides: Explaining MVP

    Notes and Instructions
    Animation 3:
    Next, we build the stakeholder a bicycle and let them use it for a while before asking for feedback. The stakeholder tells us they love the bicycle, but they admit they get tired on long trips, so is there something we can do about that?
    Animation 4:
    So next we add a motor to the bicycle to turn it into a motorcycle, and again we give it to the stakeholder to use for a while. When we ask the stakeholder for feedback, they tell us that they love the motorcycle so much because they love the feeling of the wind in their hair, they've decided that they no longer want a 4-door sedan, but instead would prefer a blue 2-door convertible.
    Animation 5:
    And so, for our last iteration, we build the stakeholder what they actually wanted (a blue 2-door convertible) instead of what they asked for (a blue 4-door sedan), and we see that they are happier than they would have been if we had delivered the traditional way.

    INSIGHTS:

    • An MVP cannot be fully known at the beginning of a project (it is the "journey" of creating the MVP with stakeholders that defines what it looks like in the end).
    • Sometimes, stakeholders don't (or can't) know what they want until they see it.
    • There is no "straight path" to your MVP, you determine the path forward based on what you learned in the previous iterations.
    • This approach is part of the "power of Agile" and demonstrates why Agile can produce better outcomes and happier stakeholders.

    Understanding minimum viable product

    NOT Like This:

    This is a series of images. The top half of the image, shows building a car by starting with the wheels. The bottom Image shows the progression from skateboard, to scooter, to bike, to motorcycle, to car.

    It's Like This:

    Use iterations to maximize value delivery

    An image showing how to use iterations to maximize value delivery.

    Use iterations to reduce accumulated risk

    An image showing how to use iterations to reduce accumulated risk.

    Understanding MVP
    (always be ready to go live)

    A great and wise pharaoh hires two architects to build his memorial pyramids.

    An image shows two architects contribution to pyramid construction.

    Understanding MVP
    (always be ready to go live)

    Several years go by, and then…

    The pharaoh is on his death bed.

    Backlog Management Module

    Manage your backlog effectively

    Activities

    Backlog 3.1 Identify key insights and takeaways
    Backlog 3.2 Perform exit survey and capture results

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Outcomes of this step

    • Identify your key insights and takeaways.

    Backlog Exercise 3.1 Identify key insights and takeaways

    30 minutes

    1. As a group, discuss and capture your thoughts on:
      1. What key insights have participants gained from the Intro to Agile presentation?
      2. What if any takeaways do participants feel are needed as a result of the presentation?
      3. What changes need to be made in the organization to support/enhance Agile adoption?
    2. Capture your findings in the table below:

    What key insights have you gained?

    What takeaways have you identified?

    • (e.g. better understanding of Agile mindset, principles, and practices)
    • (e.g. how you can improve/spread Agile practices in the organization)

    Output

    • A better understanding of Agile principles and practices
    • Action items that will help solidify Agile practices in the organization

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Backlog Exercise 3.2 Perform an exit survey

    30 minutes

    1. Wrap up this section by addressing any remaining questions participants still have.
    2. Create your local exit survey by copying the template using the link below. Then copy and distribute your local survey link.
    3. Collect the consolidated survey results in preparation for your next steps.
    4. NOTE: Using this survey template requires having access to Microsoft Forms. If you cannot access Microsoft Forms, an Info-Tech analyst can send the survey for you. Alternatively, this survey can be done with sticky notes and a pen and paper to calculate the outcomes.

    Output

    • A better understanding of Agile principles and practices
    • Action items that will help solidify Agile practices in the organization

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Download Survey Template:

    Develop Your Agile Approach Exit Survey Template

    Agile Modules

    Prioritize Agile support with your top challenges

    Backlog Management

    Scrum Simulation

    Estimation

    Product Owner

    Product Roadmapping

    1: User stories and the art of decomposition

    2: Effective backlog management & refinement

    3: Identify insights and team feedback

    1: Scrum sprint planning and retrospective simulation

    2: Pass the balls – sprint velocity game

    1: Improve product backlog item estimation

    2: Agile estimation fundamentals

    3: Understand the wisdom of crowds

    4: Identify insights and team feedback

    1: Understand product management fundamentals

    2: The critical role of the product owner

    3: Manage effective product backlogs and roadmaps

    4: Identify insights and team feedback

    1: Identify your product roadmapping pains

    2: The six "tools" of product roadmapping

    3: Product roadmapping exercise

    Organizations often struggle with numerous pain points around Agile delivery.
    The Common Agile Challenges Survey results will help you identify and prioritize the organization's biggest (most cited) pain points. Treat these pain points like a backlog and address the biggest ones first.

    Agile modules provide supporting activities:
    Each module provides guidance and supporting activities related to a specific Agile challenge from your survey. These modules can be arranged to meet each organization's or team's needs while providing cohesive and consistent messaging. For additional supporting research, please visit the Agile / DevOps Resource Center.
    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Scrum Simulation Module

    Scrum sprint planning and retrospective simulation

    Activities

    1.1 Identify your scrum pains
    1.2 Review scrum simulation intro
    1.3 Create a mock backlog
    1.4 Review sprint 0
    1.5 Determine a budget and timeline
    1.6 Understand minimum viable product
    1.7 Plan your first sprint
    1.8 Do a sprint retrospective
    1.9 "What if" exercise (understanding what a fluid backlog really means)
    1.10 A sprint 1 example
    1.11 Simulate more sprints

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Outcomes of this step

    • A better understanding of Scrum (particularly backlog management and user story decomposition).

    Facilitator slides: Scrum Simulation Introduction

    Introduction Tab

    Talk to the nature of the Scrum team:

    • Collective ownership/responsibility for delivery.
    • The organization has given you great power. With great power comes great responsibility.
    • You may each be specialists in some way, but you need to be prepared to do anything the project requires (no one goes home until everyone can go home).
    • Product owner: Special role, empowered by the organization to act as a single, authoritative voice for stakeholders (again great power/responsibility), determines requirements and priorities, three ears (business/stakeholders/team), holds the vision for the project, answer questions from the team (or finds someone who can answer questions), must balance autonomy with stakeholder needs, is first among equals on the Scrum team, is laser-focused on getting the best possible outcome with the resources, money, and circumstances ← PO acts as the "pathfinder" for the project.
    • Talk about the criticality and qualities of the PO: well-respected, highly collaborative, wise decision maker, a "get it done" type (healthy bias toward immediacy), has a vision for product, understands stakeholders, can get stakeholders' attention when needed, is dedicated full-time to the project, can access help when needed, etc.
    • The rest of you are the delivery team (have avoided singling out an SM for this – not needed for the exercise – but SM is the servant leader/orchestra conductor for the delivery team. The facilitator should act as a pseudo-SM for this exercise).

    Speak about the "bank realizes that the precise scope of the first release can only be fully known at the end of the project" statement and what it means.

    Discuss exercise and everyone's roles (make sure everyone clear), make it as realistic as possible. Your level of participation will determine how much value you get.

    Discuss any questions the participants might have about the background section on the introduction tab. The exercise has been defined in a way that minimizes the scope and complexity of the work to be done by assuming there are existing web-capable services exposed to the bank's legacy system(s) and that the project is mostly about putting a deployable web front end in place.

    Speak about "definition of done": Why was it defined this way? What are the boundaries? What happens if we define it to be only up to unit testing?

    Facilitator slides: Scrum Simulation, Create a Mock Backlog

    Create a Mock Backlog Tab

    This exercise is intended to help participants understand the steps involved in creating an initial backlog and deciding on their MVP.

    Note: The output from this exercise will not be used in the remainder of the simulation (a backlog for the simulation already exists on tab Sprint 0) so don't overdo it on this exercise. Do enough to help the participants understand the basic steps involved (brainstorm features and functions for the app, group them into epics, and decide which will be in- and out-of-scope for MVP). Examples have been provided for all steps of this exercise and are shown in grey to indicate they should be replaced by the participants.

    Step 1: Have all participants brainstorm "features and functions" that they think should be available in the online banking app (stop once you have what feels like a "good enough" list to move on to the next step) – these do not need to be captured as user stories just yet.

    Step 2: Review the list of features and functions with participants and decide on several epics to capture groups of related features and functions (bill payments, etc.). Think of these as forming the high-level structure of your requirements. Now, organize all the features and functions from Step 1, into their appropriate epic (you can identify as many epics as you like, but try to keep them to a minimum).

    Step 3: Point out that on the Introduction tab, you were told the bank wants the first release to go live as soon as possible. So have participants go over the list of features and functions and identify those that they feel are most important (and should therefore go into the first release – that is, the MVP), and which they would leave for future releases. Help participants think critically and in a structured way about how to make these very hard decisions. Point out that the product owner is the ultimate decision maker here, but that the entire team should have input into the decision. Point out that all the features and functions that make up the MVP will be referred to as the "project backlog," and all the rest will be known as the "product backlog" (these are of course, just logical separations, there is only one physical backlog).

    Step 4: This step is optional and involves asking the participants to create user stories (e.g. "As a __, I want ___ so that ___") for all the epics and features and functions that make up their chosen MVP. This step is to get them used to creating user stories, because they will need to get used to doing this. Note that many who are new to Agile often have difficulty writing user stories and end up overdoing it (e.g. providing a long-winded list of things in the "I want ___" part of the user story for an epic) or struggling to come up with something for the "so that ____" part). Help them to get good at quickly capturing the gist of what should be in the user story (the details come later).

    Facilitator slides: Scrum Simulation, Budget and Timeline

    Project Budget and Timeline

    Total Number of Sprints = 305/20 = 15.25 → ROUND UP TO 16 (Why? You can't do a "partial sprint" – plus, give yourself a little breathing room.)

    Cost Per Sprint = 6 x $75 x 8 x 10 = $36,000

    Total Timeline = 16 * 2 = 32 Weeks

    Total Cost of First Release = $36,000 x 16 = $572,000

    Talk about the "commitment" a Scrum delivery team makes to the organization ("We can't tell you exactly what we will deliver, but based on what we know, if you give the team 32 weeks, we will deliver something like what is in the project backlog – subject to any changes our stakeholder tell us are needed"). Most importantly, the team commits to doing the most important backlog items first, so if we run out of time, the unfinished work will be the least valuable user stories. Lastly, to keep to the schedule/timeline, items may move in and out of the project backlog – this is part of the normal and important "horse trading" that takes place on health Agile projects.

    Speak to the fact that this approach allows you to provide a "deterministic" answer about how long a project will take and how much it will cost while keeping the project requirements flexible.

    Facilitator slides: Scrum Simulation, Sprint 0

    Sprint 0 Tab

    This is an unprioritized list, organized to make sense, and includes a user story (plus some stuff), and "good enough estimates" – How good?... Eh! (shoulder shrug)
    Point out the limited ("lazy") investment → Agile principle: simplicity, the art of maximizing the work not done.
    Point out that only way to really understand a requirement is to see a working example (requirements often change once the stakeholders see a working example – the "that's not what I meant" factor).

    Estimates are a balancing act (good enough that we understand the overall approximate size of this, and still acknowledges that more details will have to wait until we decide to put that requirement into a Sprint – remember, no one knows how long this project is going to take (or even what the final deliverable will look like) so don't over invest in estimates here.)

    Sprint velocity calculation is just a best guess → be prepared to find that your initial guess was off (but you will know this early rather than at the end of the project). This should lead to a healthy discussion about why the discrepancy is happening (sprint retrospectives can help here). Note: Sprint velocity doesn't assume working evenings and weekends!

    Speak to the importance of Sprint velocity being based on a "sustainable pace" by the delivery team. Calculations that implicitly expect sustained overtime in order to meet the delivery date must be avoided. Part of the power of Agile comes from this critical insight. Critical → Your project's execution will need to be adjusted to accommodate the actual sprint velocity of the team!

    Point out the "project backlog" and separation from the "product backlog" (and no sprint backlog yet!).

    Point out the function/benefits of the backlog:

    • A single holding place for all the work that needs to be done (so you don't forget/ignore anything).
    • Can calculate how much work is left to do.
    • A mechanism for prioritizing deliverables.
    • A list of placeholders for further discussion.
    • An evolving list that will grow and shrink over time.
    • A "living document" that must be maintained over the course of the project.

    Talk about large items in backlog (>20 pts) and how to deal with them (do we need to break them up now?).

    Give participants time to review the backlog: Questions/What would you be doing if this were real/We're going to collectively work through this backlog.
    Sprint 0 is your opportunity to: get organized as a team, do high level design, strategize on approach, think about test data, environments, etc. – it is the "Ready-Set" in "Ready-Set-Go."
    Think about doing a High/Med/Low value determination for each user story.

    Simulation Exercise 1.1 Identify your Scrum pains

    30 minutes

    1. As a group, discuss and capture your thoughts on:
      • What specific challenges are you facing with your Scrum practices?
    2. Capture your findings in the table below:

    What are your specific Scrum challenges?

    • (e.g. We don't know how to decide on our minimum viable product (MVP), or what to start working on first)
    • (e.g. We don't have a product owner assigned to the project)
    • (e.g. Our daily standups often take 30-60 minutes to complete)
    • (e.g. We heard Scrum was supposed to reduce the number of meetings we have, but instead, meetings have increased)
    • (e.g. We don't know how to determine the budget for an Agile project)

    Output

    • Your specific Scrum related challenges

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Simulation Exercise 1.2 Review Scrum Simulation intro

    30 minutes

    1. Ask participants to read the Introduction tab in the Scrum Simulation Exercise(5 minutes)
    2. Discuss and answer any questions the participants may have about the introduction (5 minutes)
    3. Discuss the approach your org would use to deliver this using their traditional approach (5 minutes)

    This is an image of the Introduction tab in the Scrum Simulation Exercise

    How would your organization deliver this using their traditional approach?

    1. Capture all requirements in a document and get signoff from stakeholders
    2. Create a detailed design for the entire system
    3. Build and test the system
    4. Deploy it into production

    Note: Refer to the facilitator slides for more guidance on how to deliver this exercise

    Simulation Exercise 1.3 Create a mock backlog

    30-60 minutes

    Step 1: Brainstorm "Features and Functions" that the group feels would be needed for this app

    Capture anything that you feel might be needed in the Online Banking Application:

    • See account balances
    • Pay a bill online
    • Set up payees for online bill payments
    • Make a deposit online
    • See a history of account transactions
    • Logon and logoff
    • Make an e-transfer
    • Schedule a bill payment for the future
    • Search for a transaction by payee/date/amount/etc.
    • Register for app
    • Reset password

    Note: Refer to the facilitator slides for more guidance on how to deliver this exercise

    Output

    • Create a mock initial backlog for the simulated project

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Simulation Exercise 1.3 Create a mock backlog

    30-60 minutes

    Step 2: Identify your epics

    1. Categorize your "Features and Functions" list into several epics for the application:

    Epics

    "Features and Functions" in This Epic

    Administration

    - Logon and logoff
    - Register for app
    - Reset password

    Accounts

    - See account balances
    - See a history of account transactions
    - Search for a transaction by payee/date/amount

    Bill payments

    - Set up payees for online bill payments
    - Pay a bill online
    - Schedule a bill payment for the future

    Deposits

    - Make a deposit online

    E-transfers

    - Make an e-transfer

    Note: Refer to the facilitator slides for more guidance on how to deliver this exercise

    Output

    • Create a mock initial backlog for the simulated project

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Simulation Exercise 1.3 Create a mock backlog

    30-60 minutes

    Step 3: Identify your MVP

    1. Decide which "Features and Functions" will be in your MVP and which will be delivered in future releases:

    YOUR MVP (Project Backlog)

    Epics

    "Features and Functions" in This Epic

    Administration

    - Logon and logoff
    - Register for app

    Accounts

    - See account balances
    - See a history of account transactions

    Bill payments

    - Set up payees for online bill payments
    - Pay a bill online

    FOR FUTURE RELEASES (Product Backlog)

    Epics

    In Scope

    Deposits- Make a deposit online
    Accounts- Search for a transaction by payee/date/amount/etc.
    Bill payments- Schedule a bill payment for the future

    Note: Refer to the facilitator slides for more guidance on how to deliver this exercise

    Output

    • Create a mock initial backlog for the simulated project

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Simulation Exercise 1.3 Create a mock backlog

    30-60 minutes

    Step 3: Identify your MVP

    1. Decide which "Features and Functions" will be in your MVP and which will be delivered in future releases:

    YOUR MVP EPICS

    Epics

    "Features and Functions" in This Epic

    Administration

    - Logon and logoff
    - Register for app

    Accounts

    - See account balances
    - See a history of account transactions

    Bill payments

    - Set up payees for online bill payments
    - Pay a bill online

    YOUR MVP USER STORIES

    Epics

    In Scope

    Logon and LogoffAs a user, I want to logon/logoff the app so I can do my banking securely
    Register for AppAs a user, I want to register to use the app so I can bank online
    See Account BalancesAs a user, I want to see my account balances so that I know my current financial status
    See a History of Account TransactionsAs a user, I want to see a history of my account transactions, so I am aware of where my money goes
    Set up Payees for Online Bill PaymentsAs a user, I want to set up payees so that I can easily pay my bills
    Pay a Bill OnlineAs a user, I want to pay bills online, so they get paid on time

    Note: Refer to the facilitator slides for more guidance on how to deliver this exercise

    Output

    • Create a mock initial backlog for the simulated project

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Simulation Exercise 1.4 Review
    Sprint 0

    The Online Banking Application of the spreadsheet for Sprint 0.

    Step 1: Set aside the Mock Backlog just created (you will be using the Backlog on Sprint 0 for remainder of exercise).
    Step 2: Introduce and walk through the Backlog on the Sprint 0 tab in the Scrum Simulation Exercise.
    Step 3: Discuss and answer any questions the participants may have about the Sprint 0 tab.
    Step 4: Capture any important issues or clarifications from this discussion in the table below.

    Important issues or clarifications from the Sprint 0 tab:

    • (e.g. What is the difference between the project backlog and the product backlog?)
    • (e.g. What do we do with user stories that are bigger than our sprint velocity?)
    • (e.g. Has the project backlog been prioritized?)
    • (e.g. How do we decide what to work on first?)

    Note: Refer to the facilitator slides for more guidance on how to deliver this exercise

    Output

    • Understand Sprint 0 for Scrum Simulation Exercise

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Simulation Exercise 1.4 Review
    Sprint 0

    30-60 minutes

    1. Using the information found on the Sprint 0 tab, determine the projected timeline and cost for this project's first release:

    GIVEN

    Total Story Points in Project Backlog (First Release): 307 Story Points
    Expected Sprint Velocity: 20 Story Points/Sprint
    Total Team Size (PO, SM and 4-person Delivery Team): 6 People
    Blended Hourly Rate Per Team Member (assume 8hr day): $75/Hour
    Sprint Duration: 2 Weeks

    DETERMINE

    Expected Number of Sprints to Complete Project Backlog:
    Cost Per Sprint ($):
    Total Expected Timeline (weeks):
    Total Cost of First Release:

    Note: Refer to the facilitator slides for more guidance on how to deliver this exercise

    Output

    • How to determine expected cost and timeline for an Agile project

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    The Estimation Cone of Uncertainty

    The Estimation Cone of Uncertainty

    Simulation Exercise 1.6 Understanding minimum viable products (MVP)

    30 minutes

    1. Discuss your current understanding of MVP.

    How do you describe/define MVP?

    • (Discuss/capture your understanding of minimum viable product)

    Note: Refer to the facilitator slides for more guidance on how to deliver this exercise

    Output

    • Capture your current understanding of Minimum Viable Product

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Facilitator slides: Explaining MVP

    Notes and Instructions

    The primary intent of this exercise is to explain the complex notion of MVP (it is one of the most misunderstood and contentious issues in Agile delivery). The exercise is intended to explain it in a simple and digestible way that will fundamentally change participants' understanding of MVP.
    Note that the slide contains animations.

    Imagine that your stakeholder tells you they want a blue 4-door sedan (consider this our "MVP" at this point), and you decide to build it the traditional way. As you build it (tires, then frame, then body, then joint body with frame and install engine), the stakeholder doesn't have anything they can use, and so they are only happy (and able to get value) at the end when the entire car is finished (point out the stakeholder "faces" go from unhappy to happy in the end).

    Animation 1:
    When we use Agile methods, we don't want to wait until the end before we have something the stakeholders can use. So instead of waiting until the entire car is completed, we decide our first iteration will be to give the stakeholder "a simple (blue) wheeled transportation device"…namely a skateboard that they can use for a little while (it's not a car, but it is something the stakeholder can use to get places).

    Animation 2:
    After the stakeholder has tried out the skateboard, we ask for feedback. They tell us the skateboard helped them to get around faster than walking, but they don't like the fact that it is so hard to maintain your balance on it. So, we add a handle to the skateboard to turn it into a scooter. The stakeholder then uses the scooter for a while. stakeholder feedback says staying balanced on the scooter is much easier, but they don't have a place to put groceries when they go shopping, so can we do something about that?

    (Continued on next slide…)

    Facilitator slides: Explaining MVP

    Notes and Instructions

    Animation 3:
    So next we build the stakeholder a bicycle and let them use it for a while before asking for feedback. The stakeholder tells us they love the bicycle, but they admit they get tired on long trips, so is there something we can do about that?

    Animation 4:
    So next we add a motor to the bicycle to turn it into a motorcycle, and again we give it to the stakeholder to use for a while. When we ask the stakeholder for feedback, they tell us that they LOVE the motorcycle so much, and that because they love the feeling of the wind in their hair, they've decided that they no longer want a 4-door sedan, but instead would prefer a blue 2-door convertible.

    Animation 5:
    And so, for our last iteration, we build the stakeholder what they wanted (a blue 2-door convertible) instead of what they asked for (a blue 4-door sedan), and we see that they are happier than they would have been if we had delivered the traditional way.

    INSIGHTS:
    An MVP cannot be fully known at the beginning of a project (it is the "journey" of creating the MVP with stakeholders that defines what it looks like in the end).
    Sometimes, stakeholders don't (or can't) know what they want until they see it.
    There is no "straight path" to your MVP, you determine the path forward based on what you learned in the previous iterations.
    This approach is part of the "power of Agile" and demonstrates why Agile can produce better outcomes and happier stakeholders.

    Understanding minimum viable product

    NOT Like This:

    This is a series of images. The top half of the image, shows building a car by starting with the wheels. The bottom Image shows the progression from skateboard, to scooter, to bike, to motorcycle, to car.

    It's Like This:

    Use iterations to maximize value delivery

    An image showing how to use iterations to maximize value delivery

    Use iterations to reduce accumulated risk

    An image showing how to use iterations to reduce accumulated risk.

    Understanding MVP
    (always be ready to go live)

    A great and wise pharaoh hires two architects to build his memorial pyramids.

    An image shows two architects contribution to pyramid construction.

    Understanding MVP
    (always be ready to go live)

    Several years go by, and then…

    The pharaoh is on his death bed.

    Simulation Exercise 1.7 Plan your first sprint

    30-60 minutes

    Step 1: Divide participants into independent Scrum delivery teams (max 7-8 people per team) and assign a PO (5 minutes)
    Step 2: Instruct each team to work together to decide on their "MVP strategy" for delivering this project (10-15 minutes)
    Step 3: Have each team decide on which user stories they would put in their first sprint backlog (5-10 minutes)
    Step 4: Have each team report on their findings. (10 minutes)

    Describe your team's "MVP strategy" for this project (Explain why you chose this strategy):

    Identify your first sprint backlog (Explain how this aligns with your MVP strategy):

    What, if anything, did you find interesting, insightful or valuable by having completed this exercise:

    Output

    • Experience deciding on an MVP strategy and creating your first sprint backlog

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Simulation Exercise 1.8 Do a sprint retrospective

    30-60 minutes

    Step 1: Thinking about the work you did in Exercise 3.2.7, identify what worked well and what didn't
    Step 2: Create a list of "Start/Stop/Continue" items using the table below
    Step 3: Present your list and discuss with other teams

    1. Capture findings in the table below:

    Start:
    (What could you start doing that would make Sprint Planning work better?)

    Stop:
    (What didn't work well for the team, and so you should stop doing it?)

    Continue:
    (What worked well for the team, and so you should continue doing?)

    Output

    • Experience performing a sprint retrospective

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Simulation Exercise 1.9 "What if" exercise (understanding what a fluid backlog really means)

    30-60 minutes

    1. As a team, consider what you would do in each of the following scenarios (treat each one as an independent scenario rather than cumulative):

    Scenario:

    How would you deal with this:

    After playing with and testing the Sprint 1 deliverable, your stakeholders find several small bugs that need to be fixed, along with some minor changes they would like made to the system. The total amount of effort to address all of these is estimated to be 4 story points in total.

    (e.g. First and foremost, put these requests into the Project Backlog, then…)

    Despite your best efforts, your stakeholders tell you that your Sprint 1 deliverable missed the mark by a wide margin, and they have major changes they want to see made to it.

    Several stakeholders have come forward and stated that they feel strongly that the "DEPOSIT – Deposit a cheque by taking a photo" User Story should be part of the first release, and they would like to see it moved from the Product Backlog to the project backlog (Important Note: they don't want this to change the delivery date for the first release)

    Output

    • A better understanding of how to handle change using a fluid project backlog

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Simulation Exercise 1.10 A Sprint 1 example

    30-60 minutes

    1. Consider the following example of what your Sprint 1 deliverable could be:

    An example of what your Sprint 1 deliverable could be.

    Output

    • Better understanding of an MVP strategy

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Simulation Exercise 1.10 A Sprint 1 example

    30-60 minutes

    1. As a group, discuss this approach, including:
      1. The pros and cons of the approach.
      2. Is this a shippable increment?
      3. What more would you need to do to make it a shippable increment?
    2. Capture your findings in the table below:

    Discussion

    Output

    • Better understanding of an MVP strategy

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Simulation Exercise 1.11 Simulate more sprints

    30-60 minutes

    1. As a group, continue to simulate more sprints for the online banking app:
      1. Simulate the planning, execution, demo, and retro stages for additional sprints
      2. Stop when you have had enough
    2. Capture your learnings in the table below:

    Discussion and learnings

    Output

    • Better understanding of an MVP strategy

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Scrum Simulation Module

    Simulate effective scrum practices

    Activities

    2.1 Execute the ball passing sprints

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Outcomes of this step

    • Model and understand behavioral blockers and patterns affecting Agile teams and organizational culture.

    Pass the balls – sprint velocity game

    Goal 1. Pass as many balls as possible (Story Points) through the system during each sprint.
    Goal 2. Improve your estimation and velocity after each retrospective.

    Backlog

    An image of Sprint, passing balls from one individual to another until you reach the completion point.

    Points Completed

    Rules:

    1. Two people cannot touch the ball at the same time.
    2. Only the first and last person can hold more than one ball at a time.
    3. Every person on the Delivery Team must touch the ball at least once per sprint.
    4. Each team must record its results during the retrospective.

    Scoring:

    1. One point for every ball that completes the system.
    2. Minus one point for every dropped ball.

    Epic 1: 3 sprints

    1. 1-minute Planning
    2. 2-minute Sprints
    3. 1-minute Retrospective

    Group Retrospective
    Epic 2: 3 sprints (repeat)

    1. 1-minute Planning
    2. 2-minute Sprints
    3. 1-minute Retrospective

    Simulation Exercise 1.11 Simulate more sprints

    30-60 minutes

    Goal 1: Pass as many balls (Story Points) through the system during each sprint.
    Goal 2: Improve your estimation and velocity after each retrospective.

    1. Epic 1: 3 sprints
      1. 1-minute Planning
      2. 2-minute Sprints
      3. 1-minute Retrospective
    2. Group Retrospective
    3. Epic 2: 3 sprints
      1. 1-minute Planning
      2. 2-minute Sprints
      3. 1-minute Retrospective
    4. Group Retrospective
    5. Optionally repeat for additional sprints with team configurations or scenarios

    Rules:

    1. Two people cannot touch the ball at the same time.
    2. Only the first and last person can hold more than one ball at a time.
    3. Every person on the delivery team must touch the ball at least once per sprint.
    4. Each team must record its results during the retrospective.

    Scoring:

    1. One point for every ball that completes the system.
    2. Minus one point for every dropped ball.

    Output

    • Understand basic estimation, sprint, and retrospective techniques.
    • Experience common Agile behavior challenges.

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Facilitator slides: Sprint velocity game

    Goal:

    Pass as many balls as possible through the system during each cycle.

    Game Setup

    • Divide into teams of 8-16 people. If you have a smaller group, form one team rather than two smaller teams to start. The idea is to cause chaos with too many people in the delivery flow. See alternate versions for adding additional Epics with smaller teams.
    • Read out the instructions and ensure teams understand each one. Note that no assistance will be given during the sprints.

    Use your phone's timer to create 2-minute cycles:

    • 1-minute sprint planning
    • 2-minute delivery sprint
    • 1-minute retrospective and results recording
    • Run 3-4 cycles, then stop for a facilitated discussion of their observations and challenges.
    • Begin epic 2 and run for 3-4 more cycles.

    Facilitator slides: Sprint velocity game

    • Game Cycles
      • Epic 1: 3 complete cycles
      • 1-minute Planning
      • 2-minute Sprints
      • 1-minute Sprint retrospective
    • Group Retrospective
      • Discuss each sprint, challenges, and changes made to optimize throughput.
    • Epic 2: 3 complete cycles
      • 1-minute Planning
      • 2-minute Sprints
      • 1-minute Sprint retrospective
    • Group Retrospective
      • Discuss each sprint, challenges, and changes made to optimize throughput.
    • Game Rules
      • Each ball must have airtime. No ball cannot touch two people at the same time.
      • No person can hold more than one ball at a time.
      • Ball must be passed by every person on a team.
      • You may not pass a ball to a person directly to the person on your left or right.
      • Each team must keep score and record their results during the Retrospective.
    • Scoring
      • 1 point for every ball that completes the system.
      • Minus 1 point for every dropped ball.

    Facilitator slides: Sprint velocity game

    Facilitator Tips

    • Create a feeling of competition to get the teams to rush and work against each other. The goal is to show how this culture must be broken in Agile and DevOps. Then challenge the teams against natural silos and not focus on enterprise goals.
    • Create false urgency to increase stress, errors, and breakdowns in communication.
    • Look for patterns of traditional delivery and top-down management that limit delivery. These will emerge naturally, and teams will fall back into familiar patterns under stress.
    • Look for key lessons you want to reinforce and bring out ball game examples to help teams relate to something that is easier to understand.

    Alternate Versions

    • Run Epic 1 as one team, then have them break into typical Agile teams of 4-9 people. Compare results.
    • Run Epics with different goals: How would their approach change?
      • Fastest delivery
      • Highest production
      • Lowest defect rate
    • Have teams assign a scrum master to coordinate delivery. A scrum master and product owner are part of the overall team, but not part of the delivery team. They would not need to pass balls during each sprint.
    • Increase sprint time. Discuss right sizing sprint to complete work.
    • Give each team different numbers of balls, but don't tell them. Alternately, start each team with half as many balls, then double for Epic 2. Discuss how the sprint backlog affected their throughput.

    Facilitator slides: Sprint velocity game

    Trends to Look For and Discuss

    • False constraints - patterns where teams unnecessarily limited themselves.
    • Larger teams could have divided into smaller working teams, passing the balls between working groups.
    • Instructions did not limit that "team" meant everyone in the group. They could have formed smaller groups to process more work. LEAN
    • Using the first sprint for planning only. More time to create a POC.
    • Teams will start communicating but will grow silent, especially in later sprints. Stress interactions over the process.
    • Borrowing best practices from other teams.
    • Using retrospectives to share ideas with other teams. Stress needs to align with the company's goals, not just the team's goals.
    • How did they treat dropped balls? Rejected as errors, started over (false constraint), or picked up and continued?

    Trends to Look For and Discuss

    • Did individuals dominate the planning and execution, or did everyone feel like an equal member of the team?
    • Did they consider assigning a scrum master? The scrum master and product owner are part of the overall team, but not part of the Delivery Team. They would not need to pass balls during each Sprint.
    • What impacted their expected number of balls completed? Did it help improve quality or was it a distraction?
    • What caused their improvement in velocity? Draw the connection between how teams must work together and the need for stability.
    • Discuss the overall goal and constraints. Did they understand what the desired outcome was? Where did they make assumptions? Add talking points:
      • What if the goal was overall completed balls?
      • What if it was zero defect? No dropped balls.
      • What if it was the fastest delivery? Each ball through the system in the shortest time? Were they timing each ball?

    Scrum Simulation Module

    Simulate effective scrum practices

    Activities

    3.1 Identify key insights and takeaways

    3.2 Perform exit survey and capture results

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Outcomes of this step

    • Identify your key insights and takeaways

    Simulation Exercise 3.1
    Identify key insights and takeaways

    30 minutes

    1. As a group, discuss and capture your thoughts on:
      1. What key insights have participants gained from the Intro to Agile presentation?
      2. What if any takeaways do participants feel are needed as a result of the presentation?
      3. What changes need to be made in the organization to support/enhance Agile adoption?
    2. Capture your findings in the table below:

    What key insights have you gained?

    What takeaways have you identified?

    • (e.g. better understanding of Agile mindset, principles, and practices)
    • (e.g. how you can improve/spread Agile practices in the organization)

    Output

    • A better understanding of Agile principles and practices
    • Action items that will help solidify Agile practices in the organization

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Simulation Exercise 3.2
    Perform an exit survey

    30 minutes

    1. Wrap up this section by addressing any remaining questions participants still have.
    2. Create your local exit survey by copying the template using the link below. Then copy and distribute your local survey link.
    3. Collect the consolidated survey results in preparation for your next steps.
    4. NOTE: Using this survey template requires having access to Microsoft Forms. If you cannot access Microsoft Forms, an Info-Tech analyst can send the survey for you. Alternatively, this survey can be done with sticky notes and a pen and paper to calculate the outcomes.

    Download Survey Template:

    Develop Your Agile Approach Exit Survey Template

    Output

    • A better understanding of Agile principles and practices
    • Action items that will help solidify Agile practices in the organization

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Agile Modules

    Prioritize Agile support with your top challenges

    Backlog Management

    Scrum Simulation

    Estimation

    Product Owner

    Product Roadmapping

    1: User stories and the art of decomposition

    2: Effective backlog management & refinement

    3: Identify insights and team feedback

    1: Scrum sprint planning and retrospective simulation

    2: Pass the balls – sprint velocity game

    1: Improve product backlog item estimation

    2: Agile estimation fundamentals

    3: Understand the wisdom of crowds

    4: Identify insights and team feedback

    1: Understand product management fundamentals

    2: The critical role of the product owner

    3: Manage effective product backlogs and roadmaps

    4: Identify insights and team feedback

    1: Identify your product roadmapping pains

    2: The six "tools" of product roadmapping

    3: Product roadmapping exercise

    Organizations often struggle with numerous pain points around Agile delivery.
    The Common Agile Challenges Survey results will help you identify and prioritize the organization's biggest (most cited) pain points. Treat these pain points like a backlog and address the biggest ones first.

    Agile modules provide supporting activities:

    Each module provides guidance and supporting activities related to a specific Agile Challenge from your survey. These modules can be arranged to meet each organization's or team's needs while providing cohesive and consistent messaging. For additional supporting research, please visit the Agile / DevOps Resource Center.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Estimation Module

    Improve product backlog item estimation

    Activities

    1.1 Identify your estimation pains

    1.2 (Optional) Why do we estimate?

    1.3 How do you estimate now?

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Outcomes of this step

    • A better understanding of Agile estimation practices and how to apply them.

    Establish consistent Agile estimation fundamentals

    an image of a hierarchy answering the question What is an estimate.

    Know the truth about estimates and their potential pitfalls.

    Then, understand how Agile estimation works to avoid these pitfalls.

    Estimation Exercise 1.1 Identify your estimation pains

    30-60 minutes

    1. As a group, discuss and capture your thoughts on:
      1. What specific challenges are you facing with your estimation practices today
      2. Capture your findings in the table below:

    What are your specific Estimation challenges?

    • (e.g. We don't estimate consistently)
    • (e.g. Our estimates are usually off by a large margin)
    • (e.g. We're not sure what approach to use when estimating)

    Output

    • Your specific estimation related challenges

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Estimation Exercise 1.2 (Optional) Why do we estimate?

    30 minutes

    1. As a group, discuss and capture your thoughts on:
      1. Why do we do estimates?
      2. What value/merit do estimates have?
    2. Capture your findings in the table below:

    Why would/should you do estimates?

    • (e.g. Our stakeholders need to know how long it will take to deliver a given feature/function)

    Output

    • Better understanding of the need for estimates

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Estimation Exercise 1.2 (Optional) Why do we estimate?

    30 minutes

    1. Estimation has its merits
    2. Here are some sample reasons for estimates:
      • "Estimates allow us to predict when a sprint goal will be met, and therefore when a substantial increment of value will be delivered."
      • "Our estimates help our stakeholders plan ahead. They are part of the value we provide."
      • "Estimates help us to de-risk scope of uncertain size and complexity."
      • "Estimated work can be traded in and out of scope for other work of similar size. Without estimates, you can't trade."
      • "The very process of estimation adds value. When we estimate we discuss requirements in more detail and gain a better understanding of what is needed."
      • "Demonstrates IT's commitment to delivering valuable products and changes."
      • "Supports business ambitions with customers and stakeholders."
      • "Helps to build a sustainable value-delivery cadence."

    Source: DZone, 2013.

    Output

    • Better understanding of the need for estimates

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Estimation Exercise 1.3 How do you estimate now?

    30 minutes

    1. As a group, speak about now you currently estimate in your organization.
    2. Capture your findings in the table below:

    Why would/should you do estimates?

    • (e.g. We don't do estimates)
    • (e.g. We ask the person assigned to each task in the project plan to estimate how long it will take)

    Output

    • Your current estimation approach

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Estimation Module

    Improve product backlog item estimation

    Activities

    2.1 (Optional) Estimate a real PBI

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Outcomes of this step

    • A better understanding of Agile estimation practices and how to apply them.

    Don't expect your estimates to be accurate!

    The average rough order of magnitude estimates for software are off by is up to 400%.
    Source: Boehm, 1981

    Estimate inaccuracy has many serious repercussions on the project and organization

    66%

    Average cost overrun(1)

    33%

    Average schedule overrun (1)

    17%

    Average benefits shortfall)1)

    (1) % of software projects with given issue

    Source: McKinsey & Company, 2012

    The Estimation Cone of Uncertainty

    The Estimation Cone of Uncertainty

    What is Agile estimation?

    There is no single Agile estimation technique. When selecting an approach, adopt an Agile estimation technique that works for your organization, and don't be afraid to adapt it to your circumstances. Remember: all estimates are wrong, so use them with care and skepticism.

    • Understands and accepts the limitations of any estimation process.
    • Leverages good practices to counteract these limitations (e.g. wisdom of crowds, quality-first thinking).
    • Doesn't over-invest in individual estimate accuracy (but sees their value "in aggregate").
    • Approach can change from project to project or team to team and evolves/matures over the project lifespan.
    • Uses the estimation process as an effective tool to:
      • Make commitments about what can be accomplished in a sprint (to establish capacity).
      • Convey a measure of progress and rough expected completion dates to stakeholders (including management).

    Info-Tech Insight

    All estimates are wrong, but some can be useful (leverage the "wisdom of crowds" to improve your estimation practices).

    There are many Agile estimation techniques to choose from…

    Consensus-Building Techniques
    Planning Poker

    Most popular by far (stick with one of these unless there is a good reason to consider others)

    This approach uses the Delphi method, where a group collectively estimates the size of a PBI, or user stories, with cards numbered by story points. See our Estimate Software Delivery With Confidence blueprint.

    T-Shirt Sizing

    This approach involves collaboratively estimating PBIs against a non-numerical system (e.g. small, medium, large). See DZone and C# Corner for more information.

    Dot Voting

    This approach involves giving participants a set number of dot stickers or marks and voting on the PBIs (and options) to deliver. See Dotmocracy and Wikipedia for more information.

    Bucket System

    This approach categorizes PBIs by placing them into defined buckets, which can then be further broken down through dividing and conquering. See Agile Advice and Crisp's Blog for more information.

    Affinity Mapping

    This approach involves the individual sizing and sorting of PBIs, and then the order of these PBIs are collaboratively edited. The grouping is then associated with numerical estimates or buckets if desired. See Getting Agile for more information.

    Ordering Method

    This approach involves randomly ordering items on a scale ranging from low to high. Each member will take turns moving an item one spot lower or higher where it seems appropriate. See Apiumhub, Sheidaei Blog (variant), and SitePoint (Relative Mass Valuation) for more information.

    Ensure your teams have the right information

    Estimate accuracy and consistency improve when it is clear what you are estimating (definition of ready) and what it means to complete the PBI (definition of done).
    Be sure to establish and enforce your definition of ready/done throughout the project.

    Ready

    Done
    • The value of the story to the user is indicated.
    • The acceptance criteria for the story have been clearly described.
    • Person who will accept the user story is identified.
    • The team knows how to demo the story…
    • Design complete, code compiles, static code analysis has been performed and passed.
    • Peer reviewed with coding standards passed.
    • Unit test and smoke test are done/functional (preferably automated).
    • Passes functionality testing including security testing…

    What are story points?

    Many organizations use story point sizing to estimate their PBIs
    (e.g. epics, features, user stories, and tasks)

    • A story point is a (unitless) measure of the relative size, complexity, risk, and uncertainty, of a PBI.
    • Story points do not correspond to the exact number of hours it will take to complete the PBI.
    • When using story points, think about them in terms of their size relative to one another.
    • The delivery team's sprint velocity and capacity should also be tracked in story points.

    How do you assign a point value to a user story? There is no easy answer outside of leveraging the experience of the team. Sizes are based on relative comparisons to other PBIs or previously developed items. Example: "This user story is 3 points because it is expected to take 3 times more effort than that 1-point user story."Therefore, the measurement of a story point is only defined through the team's experience, as the team matures.

    Can you equate a point to a unit of time? First and foremost, for the purposes of backlog prioritization, you don't need to know the time, just its size relative to other PBIs. For sprint planning, release planning, or any scenario where timing is a factor, you will need to have a reasonably accurate sprint capacity determined. Again, this comes down to experience.

    "Planning poker" estimation technique

    Leverage the wisdom of crowds to improve your estimates

    an image of the user story points and the Fibonacci sequence

    Planning poker: This approach uses the Delphi method, where a group collectively estimates the size of a PBI or user story, using cards with story points on them.

    Materials: Each participant has deck of cards, containing the numbers of the Fibonacci sequence.

    Typical Participants: Product owner, scrum master (usually acts as facilitator), delivery team.

    Steps:

    1. The facilitator will select a user story.
    2. The product owner answers any questions about the user story from the group.
    3. The group makes their first round of estimates, where each participant individually selects a card without showing it to anyone, and then all selections are revealed at once.
    4. If there is consensus, the facilitator records the estimate and moves onto step 1 for another user story.
    5. If there are discrepancies, the participants should state their case for their selection (especially high or low outliers) and engage in constructive debate.
    6. The group makes an additional round of estimates, where step 3-6 are completed until there is a reasonable consensus.
    7. If the consensus is the user story is too large to fit into a sprint or too poorly defined, then the user story should be decomposed or rewritten.

    Estimation Exercise 2.1 (Optional) Estimate a real PBI

    30-60 minutes

    Step 1: As a group, select a real epic, feature, or user story from one of your project backlogs which needs to be estimated:

    PBI to be Estimated:

    As a ____ I want _____ so that ______

    Step 2: Select one person in your group to act as the product owner and discuss/question the details of the selected PBI to improve your collective understanding of the requirement (the PO will do their best to explain the PBI and answer any questions).
    Step 3: Make your first round of estimates using either T-shirt sizing or the Fibonacci sequence. Be sure to agree on the boundaries for these estimates (e.g. "extra-small" (XS) is any work that can be completed in less than an hour, while "extra-large" (XL) is anything that would take a single person a full sprint to deliver – a similar approach could be used for Fibonacci where a "1" is less than an hour's work, and "21" might be a single person for a full sprint). Don't share your answer until everyone has had a chance to decide on their Estimate value for the PBI.
    Step 4: Have everyone share their chosen estimate value and briefly explain their reasoning for the estimate. If most estimate values are the same/similar, allow the group to decide whether they have reached a "collective agreement" on the estimate. If not, repeat step 3 now that everyone has had a chance to explain their initial Estimate.
    Step 5: Capture the "collective" estimate for the PBI here:

    Our collective estimate for this PBI:

    e.g. 8 story points

    Output

    • A real PBI from your project backlog which has estimated using planning poker

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Estimation Module

    Improve product backlog item estimation

    Activities

    3.1 Guess the number of jelly beans (Round 1) (15 minutes)
    3.2 Compare the average of your guesses (15 minutes)
    3.3 Guess the number of gumballs (Round 2) (15 minutes)
    3.4 Compare your guesses against the actual number

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Outcomes of this step

    • A better understanding of why Agile estimation and reconciliation provides reliable estimates for planning.

    Facilitator Slides: Agile Estimation (Wisdom of Crowds Exercise – Rounds 1 and 2)

    Notes and Instructions

    The exercise is intended to mimic the way Planning Poker is performed in Agile Estimation. Use the exercise to demonstrate the power of the Wisdom of Crowds and how, in circumstances where the exact answer to a question is not known, asking several people for their opinion often produces more accurate results than most/any individual opinion.

    Some participants will tend to "shout out an answer" right away, so be sure to tell participants not to share their answers until everyone has had an opportunity to register their guess (this is particularly important in Round 1, where we are trying to get unvarnished guesses from the participants).

    In Round 1:

    • Be sure to emphasize that participants are guessing the total number of jelly beans in the jar (sometimes people think it is just the number visible)
    • Once all guesses are gathered and you've calculated the error for them (and the average guess), review the results with participants (Note: the actual number of jelly beans in the jar is 1600 (it is "greyed out" on the bottom line of the table – you can make it visible by turning off the grey highlight on that cell in the table)
    • Most of the time, the average guess will be closer to the actual than most (if not all) individual guesses (but be prepared for the fact that this doesn't always happen – this is especially true when the number of participants is small)
    • When discussing the results, ask participants to share the "method" they used to make their guess (particularly those who were closest to the actual). This part of the exercise can help them to make more accurate guesses in Round 2

    In Round 2:

    • Note that this time, participants are guessing the total number of visible gumballs in the image (both whole and partial gumballs are counted)
    • Once all guesses are gathered and you've calculated the error for them (and the average guess), review the results with participants (Note: the actual number of visible gumballs is 1600 (it is "greyed out" on the bottom line of the table – you can make it visible by turning off the grey highlight on that cell in the table)
    • Most of the time, the average guess will be closer to the actual in Round 2 than it was in Round 1
    • Talk to participants about the outcomes and how the results varied from Round 1 to Round 2, along with any interesting insights they may have gained from the exercise

    Estimation Exercise 3.1 Guess the number of jelly beans (Round 1)

    15 minutes

    1. Option 1: Microsoft Forms
      1. Create your own local survey by copying the template using the link below.
      2. Add the local Survey link to the exercise instructions or send the link to the participants.
      3. Give the participants 2-3 minutes to complete their guesses.
      4. Collect the consolidated Survey responses and calculate the results on the next slide.
      5. NOTE: Using this survey template requires having access to Microsoft Forms. If you cannot access Microsoft Forms, an Info-Tech analyst or Workshop Specialist can set up the survey for you.
    2. Option 2: Embedded Excel table
      1. On the results slide, double-click the table to open the embedded Excel worksheet.
      2. Record each participant's guess in the table.
    3. Alternatively, this survey can be done with sticky notes, a pen, paper, and a calculator to determine the outcomes.

    Download Survey Template:

    Info-Tech Wisdom of the Crowd 1 (Jelly Bean Guess

    Output

    • An appreciation for the power of the wisdom of crowds

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Estimation Exercise 3.1 Guess the number of jelly beans (Round 1)

    15 minutes

    1. Guess the total number of jelly beans in the entire container (not just the ones you can see).
    2. Be sure not to share your guess with anyone else.
    3. It doesn't matter how you settle on your guess ("gut feel" is fine, so is being "scientific" about it, as well as everything in between).
    4. Again, please don't share your guess (or even how you settled on your guess) with anyone else (this exercise relies on independent guesses).

    See slide notes for instructions.

    Output

    • An appreciation for the power of the wisdom of crowds

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Estimation Exercise 3.2 Compare the average of your guesses

    15 minutes

    A blank table for you to compare the average of your guesses at the number of Jellybeans in the Jar.

    See slide notes for instructions.

    Output

    • An appreciation for the power of the wisdom of crowds

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Guess the number of gumballs

    • Option 1: Microsoft Forms
      • Create your own local survey by copying the template using the link below.
      • Add the local Survey link to the exercise instructions or send the link to the participants.
      • Give the participants 2-3 minutes to complete their guesses.
      • Collect the consolidated Survey responses and calculate the results on the next slide.
      • NOTE: Using this survey template requires having access to Microsoft Forms. If you cannot access Microsoft Forms, an Info-Tech analyst or Workshop Specialist can set up the survey for you.
    • Option 2: Embedded Excel table
      • On the results slide, double-click the table to open the embedded Excel worksheet.
      • Record each participant's guess in the table.
    • Alternatively, this survey can be done with sticky notes, a pen, paper, and a calculator to determine the outcomes.

    Download Survey Template:

    Info-Tech Wisdom of the Crowd 2 (Gumball Guess)

    Output

    • An appreciation for the power of the wisdom of crowds

    Participants

    • PM's, PO's and SM's
    • Delivery Managers
    • Delivery Teams
    • Business Stakeholders
    • Senior Leaders
    • Other Interested Parties

    Estimation Exercise 3.3 Guess the number of gumballs (Round 2)

    15 minutes

    1. Guess the total number of gumballs visible in the photo shown on the right.
    2. Again, please don't share your guess with anyone.

    Output

    • An appreciation for the power of the wisdom of crowds

    Participants

    • PM's, PO's and SM's
    • Delivery Managers
    • Delivery Teams
    • Business Stakeholders
    • Senior Leaders
    • Other Interested Parties

    Estimation Exercise 3.2 Compare the average of your guesses

    15 minutes

    A blank table for you to compare the average of your guesses at the number of Jellybeans in the Jar.

    See slide notes for instructions.

    Output

    • An appreciation for the power of the wisdom of crowds

    Participants

    • PM's, PO's and SM's
    • Delivery Managers
    • Delivery Teams
    • Business Stakeholders
    • Senior Leaders
    • Other Interested Parties

    Estimation Module

    Improve product backlog item estimation

    Activities

    4.1 Identify key insights and takeaways
    4.2 Perform exit survey and capture results

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Outcomes of this step

    • Identify your key insights and takeaways.

    Estimation Exercise 4.2
    Identify key insights and takeaways

    30 minutes

    1. As a group, discuss and capture your thoughts on:
      1. What key insights have participants gained from the Intro to Agile presentation?
      2. What if any takeaways do participants feel are needed as a result of the presentation?
      3. What changes need to be made in the organization to support/enhance Agile adoption?
    2. Capture your findings in the table below:

    What key insights have you gained?

    What takeaways have you identified?

    • (e.g. better understanding of Agile mindset, principles, and practices)
    • (e.g. how you can improve/spread Agile practices in the organization)

    Output

    • A better understanding of Agile principles and practices
    • Action items that will help solidify Agile practices in the organization

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Estimation Exercise 4.2
    Perform an exit survey

    30 minutes

    1. Wrap up this section by addressing any remaining questions participants still have.
    2. Create your local exit survey by copying the template using the link below. Then copy and distribute your local survey link.
    3. Collect the consolidated survey results in preparation for your next steps.
    4. NOTE: Using this survey template requires having access to Microsoft Forms. If you cannot access Microsoft Forms, an Info-Tech analyst can send the survey for you. Alternatively, this survey can be done with sticky notes and a pen and paper to calculate the outcomes.

    Download Survey Template:

    Develop Your Agile Approach Exit Survey Template

    Output

    • A better understanding of Agile principles and practices
    • Action items that will help solidify Agile practices in the organization

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Agile Modules

    Prioritize Agile support with your top challenges

    Backlog Management

    Scrum Simulation

    Estimation

    Product Owner

    Product Roadmapping

    1: User stories and the art of decomposition

    2: Effective backlog management & refinement

    3: Identify insights and team feedback

    1: Scrum sprint planning and retrospective simulation

    2: Pass the balls – sprint velocity game

    1: Improve product backlog item estimation

    2: Agile estimation fundamentals

    3: Understand the wisdom of crowds

    4: Identify insights and team feedback

    1: Understand product management fundamentals

    2: The critical role of the product owner

    3: Manage effective product backlogs and roadmaps

    4: Identify insights and team feedback

    1: Identify your product roadmapping pains

    2: The six "tools" of product roadmapping

    3: Product roadmapping exercise

    Organizations often struggle with numerous pain points around Agile delivery.
    The Common Agile Challenges Survey results will help you identify and prioritize the organization's biggest (most cited) pain points. Treat these pain points like a backlog and address the biggest ones first.

    Agile modules provide supporting activities:

    Each module provides guidance and supporting activities related to a specific Agile Challenge from your survey. These modules can be arranged to meet each organization's or team's needs while providing cohesive and consistent messaging. For additional supporting research, please visit the Agile / DevOps Resource Center.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Product Owner Module

    Establish an effective product owner role

    Activities

    1.1 Identify your product owner pains
    1.2 What is a "product"? Who are your "consumers"?
    1.3 Define your role terminology

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Outcomes of this step

    • Understand product management fundamentals.
    • Define your product management roles and terms.

    Product owners ensure we delivery the right changes, for the right people, at the right time.

    The importance of assigning an effective and empowered product owner to your Agile projects cannot be overstated.

    What is a product?

    A tangible solution, tool, or service (physical or digital), which enables the long-term and evolving delivery of value to customers, and stakeholders based on business and user requirements.

    Info-Tech Insight

    A proper definition of a product recognizes three key facts.

    1. A clear recognition that products are long-term endeavors that don't end after the project finishes.
    2. Products are not just 'apps', but can be software or services that drive value.
    3. There is more than one stakeholder group that derives value from the product or service.

    Estimation Exercise 4.2
    Perform an exit survey

    30-60 minutes

    1. As a group, discuss and capture your thoughts on:
      • What specific challenges are you facing with your product owner practices today?
    2. Capture your findings in the table below:

    What are your specific Product Owner challenges?

    • (e.g. We don't have product owners)
    • (e.g. Our product owners have "day jobs" as well, so they don't have enough time to devote to the project)
    • (e.g. Our product owners are unsure about the role and its associated responsibilities)

    Output

    • Your specific product owner challenges

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Product Owner Exercise 1.2 What is a "product"? Who are your "consumers"?

    30-60 minutes

    1. Discussion:
      1. How do you define a product, service, or application?
      2. Who are the consumers that receive value from the product?

    Input

    • Organizational knowledge
    • Internal terms and definitions

    Output

    • Our definition of products and services
    • Our definition of product and service consumers/customers

    Products and services share the same foundation and best practices

    The term "product" is used for consistency but would apply to services as well.

    Product=Service

    "Product" and "Service" are terms that each organization needs to define to fit its culture and customers (internal and external). The most important aspect is consistent use and understanding of:

    • External products
    • Internal products
    • External services
    • Internal services
    • Products as a service (PaaS)
    • Productizing services (SaaS)

    Recognize the different product owner perspectives

    • Business
      • Customer facing, revenue generating
    • Operations
      • Keep the lights on processes
    • Technical
      • IT systems and tools

    "A product owner in its most beneficial form acts like an Entrepreneur, like a 'mini-CEO'. The product owner is someone who really 'owns' the product."

    – – Robbin Schuurman,
    "Tips for Starting Technical Product Managers"

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Product owners must translate needs and constraints from their perspective into the language of their audience. Kathy Borneman, Digital Product Owner at SunTrust Bank, noted the challenges of finding a common language between lines of business and IT (e.g. what is a unit?).

    Implement Info-Tech's product owner capability model

    An image of Info-Tech’s product owner capability model

    Unfortunately, most product owners operate with an incomplete knowledge of the skills and capabilities needed to perform the role. Common gaps include focusing only on product backlogs, acting as a proxy for product decisions, and ignoring the need for key performance indicators (KPIs) and analytics in both planning and value realization.

    Scale products into families to improve alignment

    Operationally align product delivery to enterprise goals

    A hierarchy showing how to break enterprise goals and strategy down into product families.

    The Info-Tech difference:

    Start by piloting product families to determine which approaches work best for your organization.

    Create a common definition of what a product is and identify products in your inventory.

    Use scaling patterns to build operationally aligned product families.

    Develop a roadmap strategy to align families and products to enterprise goals and priorities.

    Use products and families to evaluate the delivery and organizational design improvements.

    Deliver Digital Products at Scale via Enterprise Product Families

    Select the right models for scaling product management

    • Pyramid
      • Logical hierarchy of products rolling into a single service area.
      • Lower levels of the pyramid focus on more discrete services.
      • Example: Human resources mapping down to supporting applications.
    • Service Grouping
      • Organization of related services into service family.
      • Direct hierarchy does not necessarily exist within the family.
      • Example: End user support and ticketing.
    • Technical Grouping
      • Logical grouping of IT infrastructure, platforms, or applications.
      • Provides full lifecycle management when hierarchies do not exist.
      • Example: Workflow and collaboration tools.
    • Market Alignment
      • Grouping of products by customer segments or market strategy.
      • Aligns product to end users and consumers.
      • Example: Customer banking products and services.
    • Organizational Alignment
      • Used at higher levels of the organization where products are aligned under divisions.
      • Separation of product management from organizational structure no longer distinct.

    Match your product management role definitions to your product family levels

    Product Ownership exists at the different operational tiers or levels in your product hierarchy. This does not imply or require a management relationship.

    Product Portfolio
    Groups of product families within an overall value stream or capability grouping.
    Product Portfolio Manager

    Product Family
    A collection of related products. Products can be grouped along architectural, functional, operational, or experiential patterns.
    Product Family Manager

    Product
    Single product composed of one or more applications and services.
    Product Owner

    Info-Tech Insight

    The primary role conflict occurs when the product owner is a proxy for stakeholders or responsible for the delivery team. The product owner owns the product backlog. The delivery team owns the sprint backlog and delivery.

    Examine the differences between product managers and product owners

    Product management terminology is inconsistent, creating confusion in organizations introducing these roles. Understand the roles, then define terms that work best for you.

    A Table comparing the different roles of product managers to those of product owners.

    Define who manages key milestone

    Key milestones must be proactively managed. If a project manager is not available, those responsibilities need to be managed by the Product Owner or Scrum Master. Start with responsibility mapping to decide which role will be responsible.

    An image of a table with the following column headings: Example Milestones; Project Manager; Product Owner; Scrum Master*

    Product Owner Exercise 1.3 Define your role terminology

    30-60 minutes

    1. Using consistent terms is important for any organizational change and evergreen process. Capture your preferred terms to help align teams and expectations.
    Term

    Definition

    Product Owner

    • Owns and manages the product or service providing continuous delivery of value.
    • Owns the product roadmap and backlog for the product or service.
    • Works with stakeholders, end users, the delivery team, and market research to identify the product features and their estimated return on investment when implemented.
    • Responsible for refining and reprioritizing the product backlog ensuring items are "Ready" for the sprint backlog.
    • Defines KPIs to measure the value and impact of each PBI to help refine the backlog and guide the roadmap.
    • Responsible for refining and reprioritizing the sprint backlog that identifies which features will be delivered in the next sprint based on business importance.
    • Works with the product owner, stakeholders, end users, and SMEs to help define PBIs to ensure they are "Ready" for the Sprint backlog.

    Product Manager

    • Owns and manages a product or service family consisting of multiple products or services.
    • Owns the product family roadmap. Note: Product families do not have a backlog, only products do.
    • Works with stakeholders, end users, product owners, enterprise architecture, and market research to identify the product capabilities needed to accomplish goals.
    • Validates the product PBIs delivered realized the expected value and capability. Feedback is used to refine the product family roadmap and guide product owners.

    Output

    • Product management role definitions

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Product Owner Module

    Establish an effective product owner role

    Activities

    2.1 Identify enablers and blockers

    2.2 (Optional) Dissect this definition of the product owner role

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Outcomes of this step

    • Identify cultural enablers and blockers for product owners.
    • Develop a deeper understanding of the product owner role.

    The importance of establishing an effective product owner role

    The critical importance of establishing an effective product owner role (PO) for your Agile projects cannot be overstated.

    Many new-to-Agile organizations do not fully appreciate the critical role played by the PO in Scrum, nor the fundamental changes the organization will need to make in support of the PO role. Both mistakes will reduce an organization's chances of successfully adopting Agile and achieving its promised benefits.

    The PO role is critical to the proper prioritization of requirements and efficient decision-making during the project.

    The PO role helps the organization to avoid "analysis paralysis" challenges often experienced in large command-and-control-style organizations.

    A poorly chosen or disengaged product owner will almost certainly stifle your Agile project.

    Note that for many organizations, "product owner" is not a formally recognized role, which can create HR issues. Some organizational education on Agile may be needed (especially if your organization is unionized).

    Info-Tech Insight

    Failing to establish effective product owners in your organization can be a "species-killing event" for your Agile transformation.

    The three A's of a product owner

    To ensure the effectiveness of a product owner, your organization should select one that meets the three A's:

    Available: Assign a PO that can focus full-time on the project. Make sure your PO can dedicate the time needed to fulfill this critical role.
    Appropriate: It's best for the PO to have strong subject matter expertise (so-called "super users" are often selected to be POs) as well as strong communication, collaboration, facilitation, and arbitration skills. A good PO will understand how to negotiate the best outcomes for the project, considering all project constraints.
    Authoritative: The PO must be empowered by your organization to speak authoritatively about priorities and goals and be able to answer questions from the project team quickly and efficiently. The PO must know when decisions can be made immediately and when they must be made in collaboration with other stakeholders – choosing a PO that is well-known and respected by stakeholders will help to make this more efficient.

    Info-Tech Insight

    It's critical to assign a PO that meets the three A's:

    • Available
    • Appropriate
    • Authoritative

    The three ears of a product owner*

    An effective product owner listens to (and effectively balances) the needs and constraints of three different groups:

    Organizational needs/constraints represent what is most important to the organization overall, and typically revolve around things like cost, schedule, return on investment, time to market, risk mitigation, conforming to policies and regulations, etc.

    Stakeholder needs/constraints represent what is most important to those who will be using the system and typically revolve around the delivery of value, ease of use, better outcomes, making their jobs easier and more efficient, getting what they ask for, etc.

    Delivery Team needs/constraints represent what is most important to those who are tasked with delivering the project and cover a broad range that includes tools, skills, capabilities, technology limitations, capacity limits, adequate testing, architectural considerations, sustainable workload, clear direction and requirements, opportunities to innovate, getting sufficient input and feedback, support for clearing roadblocks, dependencies on other teams, etc.

    Info-Tech Insight

    An effective PO will expertly balance the needs of:

    • The organization
    • Project stakeholders
    • The delivery team

    * For more, see Understanding Scrum: Why do Product Owners Have Three Ears

    A product owner doesn't act alone

    Although the PO plays a unique and central role in the success of an Agile project, it doesn't mean they "act alone."

    The PO is ultimately responsible for managing and maintaining an effective backlog over the project lifecycle, but many people contribute to maintaining this backlog (on large projects, BA's are often the primary contributors to the backlog).

    The PO role also relies heavily on stakeholders (to help define and elaborate user stories, provide input and feedback, answer questions, participate in sprint demos, participate in testing of sprint deliverables, etc.).

    The PO role also relies heavily on the delivery team. Some backlog management and story elaboration is done by delivery team members instead of the PO (think: elaborating user story details, creating acceptance criteria, writing test plans for user stories, etc.).

    The PO both contributes to these efforts and leads/oversees the efforts of others. The exact mix of "doing" and "leading" can be different on a case-by-case basis and is part of establishing the delivery team's norms.

    Given the importance of the role, care must be taken to not overburden the product owner, especially on large projects.

    Info-Tech Insight

    While being ultimately responsible for the product backlog, a PO often relies on others to aid in backlog management and maintenance.

    This is particularly true on large projects.

    The use of a proxy PO

    Sometimes, a proxy product owner is needed.

    It is always best to assign a product owner "from the business," who will bring subject matter expertise and have established relationships with stakeholders.

    When a PO from the business does not have enough time to fulfill the needs of the role completely (e.g. can only be a part-time PO, because they have a day job), assigning a proxy product owner can help to compensate for this.

    The proxy PO acts on behalf of the PO in order to reduce the PO's workload or to otherwise support them.

    Project participants (e.g. delivery team, stakeholders) should treat the PO and proxy PO as roughly equivalent.

    Project managers (PMs) and business analysts (BAs) are often good candidates for the proxy PO role.

    NOTE: It's highly advisable for the PO to attend all/most sprint demos in order to observe progress for themselves, and to identify any misalignment with expectations as early as possible (remember that the PO still has ultimate responsibility for the project outcomes).

    Info-Tech Insight

    Although not ideal, assigning a proxy PO can help to compensate for a PO who doesn't meet all three A's of Product Ownership.

    It is up to the PO and proxy to decide how they will work together (e.g. establish their norms).

    The use of a proxy PO

    The PO and proxy must work together closely and in a highly coordinated way.

    The PO and proxy must:

    • Work closely at the start of the project to agree on the overall approach they will follow, as well as any needs and constraints for the project.
    • Communicate frequently and effectively throughout the project, to ensure progress is being made and to address any challenges.
    • Have a "meeting of the minds" about how the different "parts" of the PO role will be divided between them (including when the proxy must defer to the PO on matters).
    • Focus on ensuring that all the responsibilities of the PO role are fulfilled effectively by the pair (how this is accomplished is up to the two of them to decide).
    • Ensure all project participants clearly understand the POs' and proxies' relative responsibilities to minimize confusion and mistakes.

    The use of multiple POs

    Sometimes, having multiple product owners makes sense.

    It is always best to assign a single product owner to a project. However, under certain circumstances, it can make sense to use multiple POs.

    For example, when implementing a large ERP system with many distinct modules (e.g. Finance, HR) it can be difficult to find a single PO who has sufficient subject matter expertise across all modules.

    When assigning Multiple POs to a project, be sure to identify a "Lead PO" (who is given ultimate responsibility for the entire project) and have the remaining POs act like Proxy POs.

    NOTE: Not surprisingly, it's highly advisable for the Lead PO to attend as many Sprint Demos as possible to observe progress for themselves, and to identify any misalignment with expectations as early as possible (remember that the Lead PO has ultimate responsibility for the project outcomes).

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Although not ideal, assigning multiple POs to a project sometimes makes sense.

    When needed, be sure to identify a "Lead PO" and have the other PO's act like Proxies.

    Product Owner Exercise 2.1 Identify enablers and blockers

    30-60 minutes

    1. Brainstorm and discuss the key enablers that can help promote and ease your implementation of Product Ownership.
    2. Brainstorm and discuss the key blockers (or risks) that may interrupt or derail your efforts.
    3. Brainstorm mitigation activities for each blocker.
    Enablers Blockers Mitigation
    High business engagement and buy-in Significant time is required to implement and train resources Limit the scope for pilot project to allow time to learn
    Organizational acceptance for change Geographically distributed resources Temporarily collocate all resources and acquire virtual communication technology
    Existing tools can be customized for BRM Difficulty injecting customers in demos Educate customer groups on the importance of attendance and 'what's in it for them'

    Output

    • List of enablers and blockers to establishing product owners

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Establish an effective product owner role

    • The nature of a PO role can be somewhat foreign to many organizations, so candidates for the role will benefit from training along with coaching/mentoring support when starting out.
    • The PO must be able to make decisions quickly around project priorities, goals, and requirements.
    • A PO who is simply a conduit to a slow-moving steering committee will stifle an Agile project.
    • Establish clear boundaries and rules regarding which project decisions can be made directly by the PO and which must be escalated to stakeholders. Lean toward approaches that support the quickest decision-making (e.g. give the PO as much freedom as they need to be effective).
    • An effective PO has a good instinct for what is "good enough for now."
    • The organization can support the PO by focusing attention on goals and accomplishments rather than pushing processes and documentation.
    • Understand the difference between a project sponsor and a PO (the PO role is much more involved in the details, with a higher workload).
    • Agree on and clearly define the roles and responsibilities of PO, PM, dev manager, SM, etc. at the start of the project for clarity and efficiency.

    Characteristics to look for when selecting a product owner

    Here are some "ideal characteristics" for your POs (the more of these that are true for a given PO, the better):

    • Knows how to get things done in your organization
    • Has strong working relationships with project stakeholders (has established trust with them and is well respected by stakeholders as well as others)
    • Comes from the stakeholder community and is invested in the success of the project (ideally, will be an end user of the system)
    • Has proven communication, facilitation, mediation, and negotiation skills
    • Can effectively balance multiple competing priorities and constraints
    • Sees the big picture and strives to achieve the best outcomes possible (grounded in realistic expectations)
    • Works with a sense of urgency and welcomes ongoing feedback and collaboration with stakeholders
    • Understands how to act as an effective "funnel and filter" for stakeholder requests
    • Acts as an informal (but inspirational) leader whom others will follow
    • Has a strong sense of what is "good enough for now"
    • Protects the delivery team from distractions and keeps them focused on goals
    • Thinks strategically and incrementally

    Product Owner Exercise 2.2 (Optional) Dissect this definition of the product owner role

    30-60 minutes

    1. Take a minute or two to review the bullet points below, which describe the product owner's role.
    2. As a group, discuss the "message" for each bullet point in the description, and then identify which aspects would be "easy" and "hard" to achieve in your organization.
      • The product owner is a project team member who has been empowered by both the organization and stakeholders to act on their behalf and to guide the project directly with a single voice (supported by appropriate consultations with the organization and stakeholders).
      • The product owner must be someone with a good understanding of the project deliverable (they are often considered to be a subject matter expert in an area related to the project deliverable) and ideally is both well-known and respected by both the organization and stakeholders.
      • During the project, requirements clarification, prioritization, and scope changes are ultimately decided by the product owner, who must perform the important balancing act required by the project to adequately reflect the needs and constraints of the organization, its stakeholders, and the project team.
      • The product owner role can only be successful in an organization that has established a trusting and supportive culture. Great trust must be placed in the product owner to adequately balance competing needs in a way that leads to good outcomes for the organization. This trust must come with some authority to make important project decisions, and the organization must also support the product owner in addressing risks and roadblocks outside the control of the project team.
      • The product owner is first among equals when it comes to ultimate ownership of success for the project (along with the project delivery team itself). Because of this, any project of any significance will require the full-time effort of the product owner (don't shortchange yourself by under-investing in a willing, able, and available product owner)

    Output

    • Better understanding of the product owner role.

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Product Owner Exercise 2.2 (Optional) Dissect this definition of the product owner role

    Which aspects of the product owner are "easy" in your organization?

    Which aspects of the product owner are "hard" in your organization?

    Product Owner Module

    Establish an effective product owner role

    Activities

    3.1 Build a starting checklist of quality filters

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Outcomes of this step

    • Understand the levels in a product backlog and how to create quality filters for PBIs moving through the backlog.
    • Define your product roadmap approach for key audiences.

    Product Owner Step 3: Managing effective product backlogs and roadmaps

    The primary role of the product owner is to manage the backlog effectively.

    When managed properly, the product backlog is a powerful project management tool that directly contributes to project success.

    The product owner's primary responsibility is to ensure this backlog is managed effectively.

    A backlog stores and organizes PBIs at various stages of readiness

    A well-formed backlog can be thought of as a DEEP backlog:

    • Detailed Appropriately: Product backlog items (PBIs) are broken down and refined as necessary.
    • Emergent: The backlog grows and evolves over time as PBIs are added and removed.
    • Estimated: The effort a PBI requires is estimated at each tier.
    • Prioritized: The PBIs value and priority are determined at each tier.

    (Perforce, 2018)

    An image showing the Ideas; Qualified; Ready; funnel leading to the sprint approach.

    Backlog tiers facilitate product planning steps

    An image of the product planning steps facilitated by Backlog Tiers

    Each activity is a variation of measuring value and estimating effort to validate and prioritize a PBI.

    A PBI meets our definition of done and passes through to the next backlog tier when it meets the appropriate criteria. Quality filters should exist between each tier.

    Backlog Exercise 2.1 Build a starting checklist of quality filters

    60 minutes

    1. Quality filters provide a checklist to ensure each Product Backlog Item (PBI) meets our definition of Done and is ready to move to the next backlog group (status).
    2. Create a checklist of basic descriptors that must be completed between each backlog level.
    3. If you completed this exercise in a different Module, review and update it here.
    4. Use this information to start your product strategy playbook in Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision.

    An image of the backlog tiers, identifying where product backlog and sprint backlog are

    Output

    • List of enablers and blockers to establishing product owners

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Outline the criteria to proceed to the next tier via quality filters

    Expand the concepts of defining "ready" and "done" to include the other stages of a PBIs journey through product planning.

    An image showing the approach you will use to Outline the criteria to proceed to the next tier via quality filters

    Info-Tech Insight: A quality filter ensures quality is met and teams are armed with the right information to work more efficiently and improve throughput.

    Define product value by aligning backlog delivery with roadmap goals

    In each product plan, the backlogs show what you will deliver.

    Roadmaps identify when and in what order you will deliver value, capabilities, and goals.

    Product roadmaps guide delivery and communicate your strategy

    In Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision, we demonstrate how the product roadmap is core to value realization. The product roadmap is your communicated path, and as a product owner, you use it to align teams and changes to your defined goals while aligning your product to enterprise goals and strategy.

    This is an image Adapted from: Pichler, What Is Product Management?

    Adapted from: Pichler, "What Is Product Management?"

    Info-Tech Insight

    The quality of your product backlog – and your ability to realize business value from your delivery pipeline – is directly related to the input, content, and prioritization of items in your product roadmap.

    Product delivery realizes value for your product family

    While planning and analysis are done at the family level, work and delivery are done at the individual product level.

    An example of performing planning and analysis at the family level.

    Leverage the product family roadmap for alignment

    It's more than a set of colorful boxes. It's the map to align everyone to where you are going.

    • Your product family roadmap:
      • Lays out a strategy for your product family.
      • Is a statement of intent for your family of products.
      • Communicates direction for the entire product family and product teams.
      • Directly connects to the organization's goals.
    • However, it is not:
      • Representative of a hard commitment.
      • A simple combination of your current product roadmaps.

    Your ideal roadmap approach is a spectrum, not a choice!

    Match your roadmap and backlog to the needs of the product.

    Tactical vs strategic roadmaps.

    Product Managers do not have to choose between being tactical or strategic.
    – Aha!, 2015

    Multiple roadmap views can communicate differently yet tell the same truth

    Audience

    Business/
    IT Leaders

    Users/Customers

    Delivery Teams

    Roadmap

    View

    Portfolio

    Product Family

    Technology

    Objectives

    To provide a snapshot
    of the portfolio and
    priority products

    To visualize and validate product strategy

    To coordinate broad technology and architecture decisions

    Artifacts

    Line items or sections of the roadmap are made up of individual products, and an artifact represents a disposition at its highest level.

    Artifacts are generally grouped by product teams and consist of strategic goals and the features that realize
    those goals.

    Artifacts are grouped by
    the teams who deliver
    that work and consist of technical capabilities that support the broader delivery of value for the product family.

    Product Owner Exercise 3.1 Build a starting checklist of quality filters

    60 minutes

    1. Views provide roadmap information to different audiences in the format and level of detail that is fit to their purpose.
    2. Consider the three primary audiences for roadmap alignment.
    3. Define the roles or people who the view best fits.
    4. Define the level of detail or artifacts shared in the view for each audience.
    5. Use this information to start your product strategy playbook in Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision.

    Business/
    IT Leaders

    Users/Customers

    Delivery Teams

    Audience:

    Audience:

    Audience:

    Level of Detail/Artifacts:

    Level of Detail/Artifacts:

    Level of Detail/Artifacts:

    Output

    • List of enablers and blockers to establishing product owners

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Connecting your product family roadmaps to product roadmaps

    Your product and product family roadmaps should be connected at an artifact level that is common between both. Typically, this is done with capabilities, but it can be done at a more granular level if an understanding of capabilities isn't available.

    A comparison between product family roadmaps and product roadmaps.

    Use product roadmaps to align cross-team dependencies

    Regardless of how other teams operate, teams need to align to common milestones.

    An image showing how you may Use product roadmaps to align cross-team dependencies

    Product Owner Module

    Establish an effective product owner role

    Activities

    4.1 Identify key insights and takeaways

    4.2 Perform exit survey and capture results

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Outcomes of this step

    • Identify your key insights and takeaways.

    Product Owner Exercise 4.1
    Identify key insights and takeaways

    30 minutes

    1. As a group, discuss and capture your thoughts on:
      1. What key insights have participants gained from the Intro to Agile presentation?
      2. What if any takeaways do participants feel are needed as a result of the presentation?
      3. What changes need to be made in the organization to support/enhance Agile adoption?
    2. Capture your findings in the table below:
    What key insights have you gained? What takeaways have you identified?
    (e.g. better understanding of Agile mindset, principles, and practices) (e.g. how you can improve/spread Agile practices in the organization)

    Output

    • A better understanding of Agile principles and practices
    • Action items that will help solidify Agile practices in the organization

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Product Owner Exercise 4.2
    Perform an exit survey

    30 minutes

    1. Wrap up this section by addressing any remaining questions participants still have.
    2. Create your local exit survey by copying the template using the link below. Then copy and distribute your local survey link.
    3. Collect the consolidated survey results in preparation for your next steps.
    4. NOTE: Using this survey template requires having access to Microsoft Forms. If you cannot access Microsoft Forms, an Info-Tech analyst can send the survey for you. Alternatively, this survey can be done with sticky notes and a pen and paper to calculate the outcomes.

    Download Survey Template:

    Develop Your Agile Approach Exit Survey Template

    Output

    • A better understanding of Agile principles and practices
    • Action items that will help solidify Agile practices in the organization

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Agile Modules

    Prioritize Agile support with your top challenges

    Backlog Management

    Scrum Simulation

    Estimation

    Product Owner

    Product Roadmapping

    1: User stories and the art of decomposition

    2: Effective backlog management & refinement

    3: Identify insights and team feedback

    1: Scrum sprint planning and retrospective simulation

    2: Pass the balls – sprint velocity game

    1: Improve product backlog item estimation

    2: Agile estimation fundamentals

    3: Understand the wisdom of crowds

    4: Identify insights and team feedback

    1: Understand product management fundamentals

    2: The critical role of the product owner

    3: Manage effective product backlogs and roadmaps

    4: Identify insights and team feedback

    1: Identify your product roadmapping pains

    2: The six "tools" of product roadmapping

    3: Product roadmapping exercise

    Organizations often struggle with numerous pain points around Agile delivery.
    The Common Agile Challenges Survey results will help you identify and prioritize the organization's biggest (most cited) pain points. Treat these pain points like a backlog and address the biggest ones first.

    Agile modules provide supporting activities:

    Each module provides guidance and supporting activities related to a specific Agile challenge from your survey. These modules can be arranged to meet each organization's or team's needs while providing cohesive and consistent messaging. For additional supporting research, please visit the Agile / DevOps Resource Center.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Product Roadmapping

    Create effective product roadmaps

    Activities

    Roadmapping 1.1 Identify your product roadmapping pains
    Roadmapping 1.2 The six "tools" of product roadmapping
    Roadmapping 1.3 Product roadmapping exercise

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Outcomes of this step

    • Understand product management fundamentals
    • Understand the six "tools" of roadmapping and how to use them

    Roadmapping Exercise 1.1: Tell us what product management means to you and how it differs from a project orientation

    10-15 minutes

    1. Share your current understanding of product management.
    What is product management, and how does it differ from a project orientation?

    Output

    • Your current understanding of product management and its benefits

    Participants

    • PMs, Pos, and SMs
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Business stakeholders
    • Senior leaders
    • Other interested parties

    Definition of terms

    Project

    "A temporary endeavor undertaken to create a unique product, service, or result. The temporary nature of projects indicates a beginning and an end to the project work or a phase of the project work. Projects can stand alone or be part of a program or portfolio."

    – PMBOK, PMI

    Product

    "A tangible solution, tool, or service (physical or digital) that enables the long-term and evolving delivery of value to customers and stakeholders based on business and user requirements."
    Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision,
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Info-Tech Insight

    Any proper definition of product recognizes that they are long-term endeavors that don't end after the project finishes. Because of this, products need well thought out roadmaps.

    Deliver Digital Products at Scale via Enterprise Product Families

    Match your product management role definitions to your product family levels

    Product ownership exists at the different operational tiers or levels in your product hierarchy. This does not imply or require a management relationship.

    Product Portfolio
    Groups of product families within an overall value stream or capability grouping.
    Product Portfolio Manager

    Product Family
    A collection of related products. Products can be grouped along architectural, functional, operational, or experiential patterns.
    Product Family Manager

    Product
    Single product composed of one or more applications and services.
    Product Owner

    Info-Tech Insight

    The primary role conflict occurs when the product owner is a proxy for stakeholders or responsible for the delivery team. The product owner owns the product backlog. The delivery team owns the sprint backlog and delivery.

    Roadmapping Exercise 1.2 (Optional): Define "product" in your context*

    15-30 minutes

    1. Discuss what "product" means in your organization.
    2. Create a common, enterprise definition for "product."

    For example,

    • An application, platform, or application family.
    • Discrete items that deliver value to a user/customer.

    Capture your organization's definition of product:

    * For more on Product Management see Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision

    Output

    • Your enterprise/ organizational definition of products and services.

    Participants

    • PMs, Pos, and SMs
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Business stakeholders
    • Senior leaders
    • Other interested parties

    Product Roadmapping

    Create effective product roadmaps

    Activities

    The six "tools" of product roadmapping

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Outcomes of this step

    • Understand product management fundamentals
    • Understand the six "tools" of roadmapping and how to use them

    The six "tools" of product roadmapping

    the 6 tools of product roadmapping: Vision; Goals; Strategy; Roadmap; Backlog; Release Plan.

    Product Roadmapping

    Create effective product roadmaps

    Activities

    Roadmapping 3.1 Product roadmapping exercise
    Roadmapping 3.2 Identify key insights and takeaways
    Roadmapping 3.3 Perform an exit survey

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers and senior leaders
    • Stakeholders and delivery teams

    Outcomes of this step

    • Understand product management fundamentals
    • Understand the six "tools" of roadmapping and how to use them

    Roadmapping Exercise 1.2 (Optional): Define "product" in your context*

    30 minutes

    1. As a team, read through the exercise back story below:

    The city of Binbetter is a picturesque place that is sadly in decline because local industry jobs are slowly relocating elsewhere. So, the local government has decided to do something to reinvigorate the city. Binbetter City Council has set aside money and a parcel of land they would like to develop into a venue that will attract visitors and generate revenue for the city.

    Your team was hired to develop the site, and you have already spent time with city representatives to create a vision, goals and strategy for building out this venue (captured on the following slides). The city doesn't want to wait until the entire venue is completed before it opens to visitors, and so you have been instructed to build it incrementally in order to bring in much needed revenue as soon as possible.

    Using the vision, goals, and strategy you have created, your team will need to plan out the build (i.e. create a roadmap and release plan for which parts of the venue to build and in which order). You can assume that visitors will come to the venue after your "Release 1", even while the rest is still under construction. Select one member of your team to be designated as the product owner. The entire team will work together to consider options and agree on a roadmap/release plan, but the product owner will be the ultimate decision-maker.

    * Adapted from Rautiainen et al, Toward Agile Product and Portfolio Management, 2015

    Output

    • Practical understanding of how to apply the six tools of product roadmapping.

    Participants

    • PMs, Pos, and SMs
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Business stakeholders
    • Senior leaders
    • Other interested parties

    Roadmapping Exercise 3.1: Continued

    1. As a team, review vision, goal, and strategy:
      • Is this a "good" vision statement, and if so, why?
      • Does it live up to its definition of being: "notional and inspirational, while also calling out key guidance and constraints"?
      • Does it help you to rule in/out options for the Product?
      • e.g. Would a parking lot fit the vision?
      • What about a bunch of condominiums?
      • What about a theme park?

    Vision, Goals, and Strategy

    Product Vision: Create an architecturally significant venue that will attract both locals and tourists while also generating revenue for the city

    Roadmapping Exercise 3.1: Continued

    1. As a team, review vision, goal, and strategy:

    Vision, Goals, and Strategy

    Product Vision: Create an architecturally significant venue that will attract both locals and tourists while also generating revenue for the city

    An image of a Château-style Hotel (left) and a Gothic-style Cathedral (right)

    Goals: The venue will include a Château-style Hotel, Gothic-style Cathedral, and a Monument dedicated to the city's founder, Ivy Binbetter.

    Strategy: Develop the venue incrementally, focusing on the highest value elements first (prioritizing both usages by visitors and revenue generation).

    Roadmapping Exercise 3.1: Continued

    1. As a team, review the following exercise rules:
    • Your construction team has told you that they can divide the structures into 17 "equal" components (see below)
    • Each component will require about the same amount of time and resources to complete
    • You can ask the team to build these components in any order and temporary roofs can be built for components that are not at the top of a "stack" (e.g. you can build C3 without having to build C4 and C5 at the same time)
    • However, you cannot build the tops of any buildings first (e.g. don't build M3 until M2 and M1 are in place)

    An image of the chateau hotel and the Gothic Cathedral from the previous slide, broken down into 7 parts each

    Roadmapping Exercise 3.1: Continued

    1. As a team, review vision, goal, and strategy:
      • The city has asked you to decide on your "Release 1 MVP" and has limited you to selecting between 4 and 8 components for this MVP (fewer components = earlier opening date).
      • As a team, work together to decide which components will be in your MVP (remember, the PO makes the ultimate decision).
      • Drag your (4-8) selected MVP components over from the right and assemble them below (and explain your reasoning for your MVP selections):

    Release 1 (MVP)

    Vision, Goals, and Strategy

    Product Vision: Create an architecturally significant venue that will attract both locals and tourists while also generating revenue for the city

    Goals: The venue will include a Château-style Hotel, Gothic-style Cathedral, and a Monument dedicated to the city's founder, Ivy Binbetter.

    Strategy: Develop the venue incrementally, focusing on the highest value elements first (prioritizing both usages by visitors and revenue generation).

    An image of the chateau hotel and the Gothic Cathedral from the previous slide, broken down into 7 parts each

    Roadmapping Exercise 3.1: Continued
    (magnified venue)

    An image of the chateau hotel and the Gothic Cathedral from the previous slide, broken down into 7 parts each

    Roadmapping Exercise 3.1: Continued

    1. As a team, decide the rest of your roadmap:
      • The city has asked you to decide on the remainder of your roadmap
      • They have limited you to selecting between 2 and 4 components for each additional release (drag your selected component into each release below):
    Release 2 Release 3 Release 4 Release 5

    Vision, Goals, and Strategy

    Product Vision: Create an architecturally significant venue that will attract both locals and tourists while also generating revenue for the city

    Goals: The venue will include a Château-style Hotel, Gothic-style Cathedral, and a Monument dedicated to the city's founder, Ivy Binbetter.

    Strategy: Develop the venue incrementally, focusing on the highest value elements first (prioritizing both usages by visitors and revenue generation).

    An image of the chateau hotel and the Gothic Cathedral from the previous slide, broken down into 7 parts each

    Roadmapping Exercise 3.1: Continued

    Roadmap, Release Plan and Backlog

    an example roadmap plan; INCREASING: Priority; Requirements detail; Estimate accuracy; Level of commitment.

    Vision, Goals, and Strategy

    Product Vision: Create an architecturally significant venue that will attract both locals and tourists while also generating revenue for the city

    Goals: The venue will include a Château-style Hotel, Gothic-style Cathedral, and a Monument dedicated to the city's founder, Ivy Binbetter.

    Strategy: Develop the venue incrementally, focusing on the highest value elements first (prioritizing both usages by visitors and revenue generation).

    An image of the chateau hotel and the Gothic Cathedral from the previous slide, broken down into 7 parts each

    Roadmapping Exercise 3.2:
    Identify key insights and takeaways

    15 minutes

    1. As a group, discuss and capture your thoughts on:
      1. What key insights have participants gained from the product roadmapping module?
      2. What if any takeaways do participants feel are needed as a result of the module?
      3. What changes need to be made in the organization to support/enhance Agile adoption?
    2. Capture your findings in the table below:
    What key insights have you gained?What takeaways have you identified?
    • (e.g. better understanding of Agile mindset, principles, and practices)
    • (e.g. how you can improve/spread Agile practices in the organization)

    Output

    • A better understanding of Agile principles and practices
    • Action items that will help solidify Agile practices in the organization

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Roadmapping Exercise 3.3
    Perform an exit survey

    30 minutes

    1. Wrap up this section by addressing any remaining questions participants still have.
    2. Create your local exit survey by copying the template using the link below. Then copy and distribute your local survey link.
    3. Collect the consolidated survey results in preparation for your next steps.
    4. NOTE: Using this survey template requires having access to Microsoft Forms. If you cannot access Microsoft Forms, an Info-Tech analyst can send the survey for you. Alternatively, this survey can be done with sticky notes and a pen and paper to calculate the outcomes.

    Download Survey Template:

    Develop Your Agile Approach Exit Survey Template

    Output

    • A better understanding of Agile principles and practices
    • Action items that will help solidify Agile practices in the organization

    Participants

    • Product owners, product managers, and scrum masters
    • Delivery managers
    • Delivery teams
    • Stakeholders
    • Senior leaders

    Appendix

    Additional research to start your journey

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Mentoring for Agile Teams

    • Get practical help and guidance on your Agile transformation journey.

    Implement DevOps Practices That Work

    • Streamline business value delivery through the strategic adoption of DevOps practices.

    Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision

    • Build a product vision your organization can take from strategy through execution.

    Deliver Digital Products at Scale

    • Deliver value at the scale of your organization through defining enterprise product families.

    Bibliography

    "Agile Estimation Practice." DZone.com, 13 May 2013. Web.
    "Announcing DORA 2021 Accelerate State of DevOps Report." Google Cloud Blog. Accessed 8 Nov. 2022.
    "Are Your IT Strategy and Business Strategy Aligned?" 5Q Partners, 8 Jan. 2015. Accessed Oct. 2016.
    A, Karen. "20 Mental Models for Product Managers." Medium, Product Management Insider, 2 Aug. 2018 . Web.
    ADAMS, PAUL. "Product Teams: How to Build & Structure Product Teams for Growth." Inside Intercom, 30 Oct. 2019. Web.
    Agile Alliance. "Product Owner." Agile Alliance. n.d. Web.
    Ambysoft. "2018 IT Project Success Rates Survey Results." Ambysoft. 2018. Web.
    Banfield, Richard, et al. "On-Demand Webinar: Strategies for Scaling Your (Growing) Enterprise Product Team." Pluralsight, 31 Jan. 2018. Web.
    Bloch, Michael, Sven Blumberg, and Jurgen Laartz. "Delivering Large-Scale IT Projects on Time, on Budget, and on Value." McKinsey & Company, October 2012.
    Blueprint. "10 Ways Requirements Can Sabotage Your Projects Right From the Start." Blueprint. 2012. Web.
    Boehm, Barry W. Software Engineering Economics. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1981.
    Breddels, Dajo, and Paul Kuijten. "Product Owner Value Game." Agile2015 Conference. 2015. Web.
    Cagan, Martin. "Behind Every Great Product." Silicon Valley Product Group. 2005. Web.
    "Chaos Report 2015." The Standish Group, 2015. Accessed 29 July 2022.
    Cohn, Mike. Succeeding With Agile: Software Development Using Scrum. Addison-Wesley. 2010. Web.
    Connellan, Thomas K. Inside the Magic Kingdom, Bard Press, 1997. Print.
    Dyba, Tore, and Torgeir Dingsøyr. "Empirical Studies of Agile Software Development: A Systematic Review." Elsevier, ScienceDirect. 24 Jan. 2008. Web.
    "How do you define a product?" Scrum.org. 4 Apr 2017, Web
    EDUCAUSE. "Aligning IT Funding Models to the Pace of Technology Change." EDUCAUSE. 14 Dec. 2015. Web.
    Eick, Stephen. "Does Code Decay? Assessing the Evidence from Change Management Data." IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 27, no. 1, Jan. 2001, pp. 1-12. Web.
    "Enablers." Scaled Agile. n.d. Web.
    "Epic." Scaled Agile. n.d. Web.
    Eringa, Ron. "Evolution of the Product Owner." RonEringa.com. 12 June 2016. Web.
    Fernandes, Thaisa. "Spotify Squad Framework - Part I." Medium.com. 6 Mar. 2017. Web.
    Fowler, Martin. "Application Boundary." MartinFowler.com. 11 Sept. 2003. Web. 20 Nov. 2017.
    Galen, Robert. "Measuring Technical Product Managership – What Does 'Good' Look Like ...." RGalen Consulting. 5 Aug. 2015. Web.
    Hackshall, Robin. "Product Backlog Refinement." Scrum Alliance. 9 Oct. 2014. Web. Feb. 2019.
    Halisky, Merland, and Luke Lackrone. "The Product Owner's Universe." Agile Alliance, Agile2016. 2016. Web.
    Kamer, Jurriaan. "How to Build Your Own 'Spotify Model'." Medium.com. 9 Feb. 2018. Web.
    Karlsson, Johan. "Backlog Grooming: Must-Know Tips for High-Value Products." Perforce. 18 May 2018. Web. Feb. 2019.
    Lindstrom, Lowell. "7 Skills You Need to Be a Great Product Owner." Scrum Alliance. n.d. Web.
    Lawrence, Richard, and Peter Green. "The Humanizing Work Guide to Splitting User Stories." Humanizing Work, 22 Oct. 2020. Web.
    Leffingwell, Dean. "SAFe 5.0." Scaled Agile Inc. 2021. Web. Feb. 2021.
    Lucero, Mario. "Product Backlog – Deep Model." Agilelucero. 8 Oct. 2014. Web.
    Lukassen, Chris. "The Five Belts Of The Product Owner." Xebia.com. 20 Sept. 2016. Web.
    Management 3.0. "Delegation Poker Product Image." Management 3.0. n.d. Web.
    McCloskey, Heather. "Scaling Product Management: Secrets to Defeating Common Challenges." Scaling Product Management: Secrets to Defeating Common Challenges, ProductPlan, 12 July 2019 . Web.
    McCloskey, Heather. "When and How to Scale Your Product Team." UserVoice Blog, UserVoice, 21 Feb. 2017 . Web.
    Medium.com. "Exploring Key Elements of Spotify's Agile Scaling Model." Medium.com. 23 July 2018. Web.
    Mironov, Rich. "Scaling Up Product Manager/Owner Teams: - Rich Mironov's Product Bytes." Rich Mironov's Product Bytes, Mironov Consulting, 12 Apr. 2014 . Web.
    "Most Agile Transformations Will Fail." Vitality Chicago Inc., 24 Jan. 2019.
    Overeem, Barry. "A Product Owner Self-Assessment." Barry Overeem. 6 Mar. 2017. Web.
    Overeem, Barry. "Retrospective: Using the Team Radar." Barry Overeem. 27 Feb. 2017. Web.
    "PI Planning." Scaled Agile. n.d. Web.
    "PI Planning."SAFe. 2020.
    Pichler, Roman. "How to Scale the Scrum Product Owner." Roman Pichler, 28 June 2016 . Web.
    Pichler, Roman. "Product Management Framework." Pichler Consulting Limited. 2014. Web.
    Pichler, Roman. "Sprint Planning Tips for Technical Product Managers." LinkedIn. 4 Sept. 2018. Web.
    Pichler, Roman. "What Is Product Management?" Pichler Consulting Limited. 26 Nov. 2014. Web.
    Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide). 7th ed., Project Management Institute, 2021.
    Radigan, Dan. "Putting the 'Flow' Back in Workflow With WIP Limits." Atlassian. n.d. Web.
    Royce, Dr. Winston W. "Managing the Development of Large Software Systems." Scf.usc.edu. 1970. Web.
    Schuurman, Robbin. "10 Tips for Technical Product Managers on Agile Product Management." Scrum.org. 28 Nov. 2017. Web.
    Schuurman, Robbin. "10 Tips for Technical Product Managers on (Business) Value." Scrum.org. 30 Nov. 2017. Web.
    Schuurman, Robbin. "10 Tips for Technical Product Managers on Product Backlog Management." Scrum.org. 5 Dec. 2017. Web.
    Schuurman, Robbin. "10 Tips for Technical Product Managers on the Product Vision." Scrum.org. 29 Nov. 2017. Web.
    Schuurman, Robbin. "Tips for Starting Technical Product Managers." Scrum.org. 27 Nov. 2017. Web.
    Sharma, Rohit. "Scaling Product Teams the Structured Way." Monetary Musings, Monetary Musings, 28 Nov. 2016 . Web.
    STEINER, ANNE. "Start to Scale Your Product Management: Multiple Teams Working on Single Product." Cprime, Cprime, 6 Aug. 2019 . Web.
    Shirazi, Reza. "Betsy Stockdale of Seilevel: Product Managers Are Not Afraid To Be Wrong." Austin VOP #50. 2 Oct. 2018. Web.
    Standish Group, The. "The Standish Group 2015 Chaos Report." The Standish Group. 2015. Web.
    Theus, Andre. "When Should You Scale the Product Management Team?" When Should You Scale the Product Management Team?, ProductPlan, 7 May 2019 . Web.
    Todaro, Dave. "Splitting Epics and User Stories." Ascendle. n.d. Web. Feb. 2019.
    Tolonen, Arto. "Scaling Product Management in a Single Product Company." Smartly.io - Digital Advertising Made Easy, Effective, and Enjoyable, Smartly.io, 26 Apr. 2018 . Web.
    Ulrich, Catherine. "The 6 Types of Product Managers. Which One Do You Need?" Medium.com. 19 Dec. 2017. Web.
    Vähäniitty, J. et al. "Chapter 7: Agile Product Management" in Towards Agile Product and Portfolio Management. Aalto University Software Process Research Group, 2010.
    VersionOne. "12th Annual State of Agile Report." VersionOne. 9 April 2018. Web.
    Verwijs, Christiaan. "Retrospective: Do The Team Radar." Medium.com. 10 Feb. 2017. Web.
    "Why Agile Fails Because of Corporate Culture - DZone Agile." Dzone.Com. Accessed 31 Aug. 2021.

    page 1 of the appendix
    page 2 of the appendix
    page 3 of the appendix
    page 4 of the appendix

    Cultural advantages of Agile

    Collaboration

    Team members leverage all their experience working towards a common goal.

    Iterations

    Cycles provide opportunities for more product feedback.

    Prioritization

    The most important needs are addressed in the current iteration.

    Continual Improvement

    Self-managing teams continually improve their approach for next iteration.

    A backlog stores and organizes PBIs at various stages of readiness

    A well-formed backlog can be thought of as a DEEP backlog:

    • Detailed Appropriately: Product backlog items (PBIs) are broken down and refined as necessary.
    • Emergent: The backlog grows and evolves over time as PBIs are added and removed.
    • Estimated: The effort a PBI requires is estimated at each tier.
    • Prioritized: The PBIs value and priority are determined at each tier.

    (Perforce, 2018)

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Don't fully elaborate all of your PBIs at the beginning of the project instead, make sure they are elaborated "just in time." (Keep no more than 2 or 3 sprints worth of user stories in the Ready state.)

    An image showing the Ideas; Qualified; Ready; funnel leading to the sprint aproach.

    Scrum versus Kanban: Key differences

    page 6 of the appendix

    Scrum versus Kanban: When to use each

    Scrum: Delivering related or grouped changes in fixed time intervals.

    • Coordinating the development or release of related items
    • Maturing a product or service
    • Interdependencies between work items

    Kanban: Delivering independent items as soon as each is ready.

    • Work items from ticketing or individual requests
    • Completing independent changes
    • Releasing changes as soon as possible

    Develop an adaptive governance process

    page 7 of the appendix

    Five key principles for building an adaptive governance framework

    Delegate and Empower

    Decision making must be delegated down within the organization, and all resources must be empowered and supported to make effective decisions.

    Define Outcomes

    Outcomes and goals must be clearly articulated and understood across the organization to ensure decisions are in line and stay within reasonable boundaries.

    Make Risk informed decisions

    Integrated risk information must be available with sufficient data to support decision making and design approaches at all levels of the organization.

    Embed / Automate

    Governance standards and activities need to be embedded in processes and practices. Optimal governance reduces its manual footprint while remaining viable. This also allows for more dynamic adaptation.

    Establish standards and behavior

    Standards and policies need to be defined as the foundation for embedding governance practices organizationally. These guardrails will create boundaries to reinforce delegated decision making.

    Maturing governance is a journey

    Organizations should look to progress in their governance stages. Ad-Hoc, and controlled governance tends to be slow, expensive, and a poor fit for modern practices.

    The goal as you progress in your stages is to delegate governance and empower teams to make optimal decisions in real-time, knowing that they are aligned with the understood best interests of the organization.

    Automate governance for optimal velocity, while mitigating risks and driving value.

    This puts your organization in the best position to be adaptive and able to react effectively to volatility and uncertainty.

    page 8 of the appendix

    Business value is a key component to driving better decision making

    Better Decisions

    • Team Engagement
    • Frequent Delivery
    • Stakeholder Input
    • Market Analysis
    • Articulating Business Value
    • Focus on Business Needs

    Facilitation Planning Tool

    • Double-click the embedded Excel workbook to select and plan your exercises and timing.
    • Place or remove the "X" in the "Add to Agenda" column to add it to the workshop agenda and duration estimate.
    • Verify the exercise and step timing estimates from the blueprint provided on the "Detailed Workshop Planner" in columns C-F and adjust based on your facilitation and intended audience.

    an image of the Facilitation Planning Tool

    Appendix:
    SDLC transformation steps

    Waterfall SDLC: Valuable product delivered at the end of an extended project lifecycle, frequently in years

    Page 1 of the SDLC Appendix.

    • Business separated from delivery of technology it needs, only one third of product is actually valuable (Info-Tech, N=40,000).
    • In Waterfall, a team of experts in specific disciplines hand off different aspects of the lifecycle.
    • Document signoffs are required to ensure integration between silos (Business, Dev, and Ops) and individuals.
    • A separate change request process lays over the entire lifecycle to prevent changes from disrupting delivery.
    • Tools are deployed to support a specific role (e.g. BA) and seldom integrated (usually requirements <-> test).

    Wagile/Agifall/WaterScrumFall SDLC: Valuable product delivered in multiple releases

    Page 2 of the SDLC Appendix.

    • Business is more closely integrated by a business product owner accountable for day-to-day delivery of value for users.
    • The team collaborates and develops cross-functional skills as they define, design, build, and test code over time.
    • Signoffs are reduced but documentation is still focused on satisfying project delivery and operations policy requirements.
    • Change is built into the process to allow the team to respond to change dynamically.
    • Tools start to be integrated to streamline delivery (usually requirements and Agile work management tools).

    Agile SDLC: Valuable product delivered iteratively; frequency depends on Ops' capacity

    Page 3 of the SDLC Appendix.

    • Business users are closely integrated through regularly scheduled demos (e.g. every two weeks).
    • Team is fully cross-functional and collaboratesto plan, define, design, build, and test the code supported by specialists.
    • Documentation is focused on future development and operations needs.
    • Change is built into the process to allow the team to respond to change dynamically.
    • Explore automation for application development (e.g. automated regression testing).

    Agile with DevOps SDLC: High frequency iterative delivery of valuable product (e.g. every two weeks)

    Page 4 of the SDLC Appendix.

    • Business users are closely integrated through regularly scheduled demos.
    • Dev and ops teams collaborate to plan, define, design, build, test, and deploy code supported by automation.
    • Documentation is focused on supporting users, future changes, and operational support.
    • Change is built into the process to allow the team to respond to change dynamically.
    • Build, test, deploy is fully automated (service desk is still separated).

    DevOps SDLC: Continuous integration and delivery

    Page 5 of the SDLC Appendix.

    • Business users are closely integrated through regularly scheduled demos.
    • Fully integrated DevOps team collaborates to plan, define, design, build, test, deploy, and maintain code.
    • Documentation Is focused on future development and use adoption.
    • Change is built into the process to allow the team to respond to change dynamically.
    • Fully integrated development and operations toolchain.

    Fully integrated product SDLC: Agile + DevOps + continuous delivery of valuable product on demand

    Page 6 of the SDLC Appendix.

    • Business users are fully integrated with the teams through dedicated business product owner.
    • Cross-functional teams collaborate across the business and technical life of the product.
    • Documentation supports internal and external needs (business, users, Ops).
    • Change is built into the process to allow the team to respond to change dynamically.
    • Fully integrated toolchain (including service desk).

    Manage the Active Directory in the Service Desk

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}489|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Service Desk
    • Parent Category Link: /service-desk
    • Actively maintaining the Active Directory is a difficult task that only gets more difficult with issues like stale accounts and privilege creep.
    • Adding permissions without removing them in lateral transfers creates access issues, especially when regulatory requirements like HIPAA require tight controls.
    • With the importance of maintaining and granting permissions within the Active Directory, organizations are hesitant to grant domain admin access to Tier 1 of the service desk. However, inundating Tier 2 analysts with requests to grant permissions takes away project time.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Do not treat the Active Directory like a black box. Strive for accurate data and be proactive by managing your monitoring and audit schedules.
    • Catch outage problems before they happen by splitting monitoring tasks between daily, weekly, and monthly routines.
    • Shift left to save resourcing by employing workflow automation or scripted authorization for Tier 1 technicians.
    • Design actionable metrics to monitor and manage your Active Directory.

    Impact and Result

    • Consistent and right-sized monitoring and updating of the Active Directory is key to clean data.
    • Split monitoring activities between daily, weekly, and monthly checklists to raise efficiency.
    • If need be, shift-left strategies can be implemented for identity and access management by scripting the process so that it can be done by Tier 1 technicians.

    Manage the Active Directory in the Service Desk Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should manage your Active Directory in the service desk, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Maintain your Active Directory with clean data

    Building and maintaining your Active Directory does not have to be difficult. Standardized organization and monitoring with the proper metrics help you keep your data accurate and up to date.

    • Active Directory Standard Operating Procedure
    • Active Directory Metrics Tool

    2. Structure your service desk Active Directory processes

    Build a comprehensive Active Directory workflow library for service desk technicians to follow.

    • Active Directory Process Workflows (Visio)
    • Active Directory Process Workflows (PDF)
    [infographic]

    Terms and Conditions for consulting to businesses

    By signing an agreement with Gert Taeymans bvba, Client declares that he agrees with the Terms and Conditions referred to hereafter. Terms and conditions on Client's order form or any other similar document shall not be binding upon Gert Taeymans bvba.

    The prices, quantities and delivery time stated in any quotation are not binding upon Gert Taeymans bvba. They are commercial estimates only which Gert Taeymans bvba will make reasonable efforts to achieve. Prices quoted in final offers will be valid only for 30 days. All prices are VAT excluded and do not cover expenses, unless otherwise agreed in writing. Gert Taeymans bvba reserves the right to increase a quoted fee in the event that Client requests a variation to the work agreed.

    The delivery times stated in any quotation are of an indicative nature and not binding upon Gert Taeymans bvba, unless otherwise agreed in writing. Delivery times will be formulated in working days. In no event shall any delay in delivery be neither cause for cancellation of an order nor entitle Client to any damages.

    Amendments or variations of the initial agreement between Client and Gert Taeymans bvba will only be valid when accepted by both parties in writing.

    Any complaints concerning the performance of services must be addressed to Gert Taeymans bvba in writing and by registered mail within 7 working days of the date of the performance of the services.

    In no event shall any complaint be just cause for non-payment or deferred payment of invoices. Any invoice and the services described therein will be deemed irrevocably accepted by Client if no official protest of non-payment has been sent by Client within 7 working days from the date of the mailing of the invoice.

    Client shall pay all invoices of Gert Taeymans bvba within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of invoice unless otherwise agreed in writing by Gert Taeymans bvba. In the event of late payment, Gert Taeymans bvba may charge a monthly interest on the amount outstanding at the rate of two (2) percent with no prior notice of default being required, in which case each commenced month will count as a full month. Any late payment will entitle Gert Taeymans bvba to charge Client a fixed handling fee of 300 EUR. All costs related to the legal enforcement of the payment obligation, including lawyer fees, will be charged to Client.

    In no event will Gert Taeymans bvba be liable for damages of any kind, including without limitation, direct, incidental or consequential damages (including, but not limited to, damages for lost profits, business interruption and loss of programs or information) arising out of the use of Gert Taeymans bvba services.

    Gert Taeymans bvba collects personal data from Client for the performance of its services and the execution of its contracts. Such personal data can also be used for direct marketing, allowing Gert Taeymans bvba to inform Client of its activities on a regular basis. If Client objects to the employment of its personal data for direct marketing, Client must inform Gert Taeymans bvba on the following address: gert@gerttaeymans.consulting.

    Client can consult, correct or amend its personal data by addressing such request to Gert Taeymans bvba by registered mail. Personal data shall in no event be sold, rented or made available to other firms or third parties where not needed for the execution of the contract. Gert Taeymans bvba reserves the right to update and amend its privacy policy from time to time to remain consistent with applicable privacy legislation.

    The logo of the Client will be displayed on the Gert Taeymans bvba website, together with a short description of the project/services.

    Any changes to Client’s contact information such as addresses, phone numbers or e-mail addresses must be communicated to Gert Taeymans bvba as soon as possible during the project.

    Both parties shall maintain strict confidence and shall not disclose to any third party any information or material relating to the other or the other's business, which comes into that party's possession and shall not use such information and material. This provision shall not, however, apply to information or material, which is or becomes public knowledge other than by breach by a party of this clause.

    Gert Taeymans bvba has the right at any time to change or modify these terms and conditions at any time without notice.

    The agreement shall be exclusively governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of Belgium. The competent courts of Antwerp, Belgium will finally settle any dispute about the validity, the interpretation or the execution of this agreement.

    These Terms and Conditions are the only terms and conditions applicable to both parties.

    If any provision or provisions of these Terms and Conditions shall be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, such provision shall be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, and the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.

    Implement and Optimize Application Integration Governance

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}361|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Enterprise Integration
    • Parent Category Link: /enterprise-integration
    • Enterprises begin integrating their applications without recognizing the need for a managed and documented governance model.
    • Application Integration (AI) is an inherently complex concept, involving the communication among multiple applications, groups, and even organizations; thus developing a governance model can be overwhelming.
    • The options for AI Governance are numerous and will vary depending on the size, type, and maturity of the organization, adding yet another layer of complexity.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Governance is essential with integrated applications. If you are planning to integrate your applications, you should already be considering a governance model.
    • Proper governance requires oversight into chains of responsibility, policy, control mechanisms, measurement, and communication.
    • People and process are key. Technology options to aid in governance of integrated apps exist, but will not greatly contribute to the success of AI.

    Impact and Result

    • Assess your capabilities and determine which area of governance requires the most attention to achieve success in AI.
    • Form an Integration Center of Competency to oversee AI governance to ensure compliance and increase success.
    • Conduct ongoing training with your personnel to ensure up-to-date skills and end user understanding.
    • Frequently revisit your AI governance strategy to ensure alignment with business goals.

    Implement and Optimize Application Integration Governance Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Implement and optimize Application Integration Governance

    Know where to start and where to focus your attention in the implementation of an AI governance strategy.

    • Storyboard: Implement and Optimize Application Integration Governance

    2. Assess the organization's capabilities in AI Governance

    Assess your current and target states in AI Governance.

    • Application Integration Governance Gap Analysis Tool

    3. Create an Integration Center of Competency

    Have a governing body to oversee AI Governance.

    • Integration Center of Competency Charter Template

    4. Establish AI Governance principles and guidelines

    Create a basis for the organization’s AI governance model.

    • Application Integration Policy and Principles Template

    5. Create an AI service catalog

    Keep record of services and interfaces to reduce waste.

    • Integration Service Catalog Template
    [infographic]

    2020 Security Priorities Report

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}245|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Security Strategy & Budgeting
    • Parent Category Link: /security-strategy-and-budgeting

    Use this deck to learn what projects security practitioners are prioritizing for 2020. Based on a survey of 460 IT security professionals, this report explains what you need to know about the top five priorities, including:

    • Signals and drivers
    • Benefits
    • Critical uncertainties
    • Case study
    • Implications

    While the priorities should in no way be read as prescriptive, this research study provides a high-level guide to understand that priorities drive the initiatives, projects, and responsibilities that make up organizations' security strategies.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    There is always more to do, and if IT leaders are to grow with the business, provide meaningful value, and ascend the ladder to achieve true business partner and innovator status, aggressive prioritization is necessary. Clearly, security has become a priority across organizations, as security budgets have continued to increase over the course of 2019. 2020’s priorities highlight that data security has become the thread that runs through all other security priorities, as data is now the currency of the modern digital economy. As a result, data security has reshaped organizations’ priorities to ensure that data is always protected.

    Impact and Result

    Ultimately, understanding how changes in technology and patterns of work stand to impact the day-to-day lives of IT staff across seniority and industries will allow you to evaluate what your priorities should be for 2020. Ensure that you’re spending your time right. Use data to validate. Prioritize and implement.

    2020 Security Priorities Report Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    This storyboard will help you understand what projects security practitioners are prioritizing for 2020.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Data security

    Data security often rubs against other organizational priorities like data quality, but organizations need to understand that the way they store, handle, and dispose of data is now under regulatory oversight.

    • 2020 Security Priorities Report – Priority 1: Data Security

    2. Cloud security

    Cloud security means that organizations can take advantage of automation tools not only for patching and patch management but also to secure code throughout the SDLC. It is clear that cloud will transform how security is performed.

    • 2020 Security Priorities Report – Priority 2: Cloud Security

    3. Email security

    Email security is critical, since email continues to be one of the top points of ingress for cyberattacks from ransomware to business email compromise.

    • 2020 Security Priorities Report – Priority 3: Email Security

    4. Security risk management

    Security risk management requires organizations to make decisions based on their individual risk tolerance on such things as machine learning and IoT devices.

    • 2020 Security Priorities Report – Priority 4: Security Risk Management

    5. Security awareness and training

    Human error continues to be a security issue. In 2020, organizations should tailor their security awareness and training to their people so that they are more secure not only at work but also in life.

    • 2020 Security Priorities Report – Priority 5: Security Awareness and Training
    [infographic]

    Develop a Business Continuity Plan

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}411|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.1/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $37,093 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 30 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: DR and Business Continuity
    • Parent Category Link: /business-continuity
    • Recent crises have increased executive awareness and internal pressure to create a business continuity plan (BCP).
    • Industry and government-driven regulations require evidence of sound business continuity practices.
    • Customers demand their vendors provide evidence of a workable BCP prior to signing a contract.
    • IT leaders, because of their cross-functional view and experience with incident management and DR, are often asked to lead BCP efforts.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • BCP requires input from multiple departments with different and sometimes conflicting objectives. There are typically few, if any, dedicated resources for BCP, so it can't be a full-time, resource-intensive project.
    • As an IT leader you have the skill set and organizational knowledge to lead a BCP project, but ultimately business leaders need to own the BCP – they know their processes, and therefore, their requirements to resume business operations better than anyone else.
    • The traditional approach to BCP is a massive project that most organizations can’t execute without hiring a consultant. To execute BCP in-house, carve up the task into manageable pieces as outlined in this blueprint.

    Impact and Result

    • Implement a structured and repeatable process that you apply to one business unit at a time to keep BCP planning efforts manageable.
    • Use the results of the pilot to identify gaps in your recovery plans and reduce overall continuity risk while continuing to assess specific risks as you repeat the process with additional business units.
    • Enable business leaders to own the BCP going forward. Develop a template that the rest of the organization can use.
    • Leverage BCP outcomes to refine IT DRP recovery objectives and achieve DRP-BCP alignment.

    Develop a Business Continuity Plan Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should develop a business continuity plan, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Identify BCP maturity and document process dependencies

    Assess current maturity, establish a team, and choose a pilot business unit. Identify business processes, dependencies, and alternatives.

    • BCP Maturity Scorecard
    • BCP Pilot Project Charter Template
    • BCP Business Process Workflows Example (Visio)
    • BCP Business Process Workflows Example (PDF)

    2. Conduct a BIA to determine acceptable RTOs and RPOs

    Define an objective impact scoring scale, estimate the impact of downtime, and set recovery targets.

    • BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool

    3. Document the recovery workflow and projects to close gaps

    Build a workflow of the current steps for business recovery. Identify gaps and risks to recovery. Brainstorm and prioritize solutions to address gaps and mitigate risks.

    • BCP Tabletop Planning Template (Visio)
    • BCP Tabletop Planning Template (PDF)
    • BCP Project Roadmap Tool
    • BCP Relocation Checklists

    4. Extend the results of the pilot BCP and implement governance

    Present pilot project results and next steps. Create BCMS teams. Update and maintain BCMS documentation.

    • BCP Pilot Results Presentation
    • BCP Summary
    • Business Continuity Teams and Roles Tool

    5. Appendix: Additional BCP tools and templates

    Use these tools and templates to assist in the creation of your BCP.

    • BCP Recovery Workflow Example (Visio)
    • BCP Recovery Workflow Example (PDF)
    • BCP Notification, Assessment, and Disaster Declaration Plan
    • BCP Business Process Workarounds and Recovery Checklists
    • Business Continuity Management Policy
    • Business Unit BCP Prioritization Tool
    • Industry-Specific BIA Guidelines
    • BCP-DRP Maintenance Checklist
    • Develop a COVID-19 Pandemic Response Plan Storyboard
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Develop a Business Continuity Plan

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Define BCP Scope, Objectives, and Stakeholders

    The Purpose

    Define BCP scope, objectives, and stakeholders.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Prioritize BCP efforts and level-set scope with key stakeholders.

    Activities

    1.1 Assess current BCP maturity.

    1.2 Identify key business processes to include in scope.

    1.3 Flowchart key business processes to identify business processes, dependencies, and alternatives.

    Outputs

    BCP Maturity Scorecard: measure progress and identify gaps.

    Business process flowcharts: review, optimize, and allow for knowledge transfer of processes.

    Identify workarounds for common disruptions to day-to-day continuity.

    2 Define RTOs and RPOs Based on Your BIA

    The Purpose

    Define RTOs and RPOs based on your BIA.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Set recovery targets based business impact, and illustrate the importance of BCP efforts via the impact of downtime.

    Activities

    2.1 Define an objective scoring scale to indicate different levels of impact.

    2.2 Estimate the impact of downtime.

    2.3 Determine acceptable RTO/RPO targets for business processes based on business impact.

    Outputs

    BCP Business Impact Analysis: objective scoring scale to assess cost, goodwill, compliance, and safety impacts.

    Apply the scoring scale to estimate the impact of downtime on business processes.

    Acceptable RTOs/RPOs to dictate recovery strategy.

    3 Create a Recovery Workflow

    The Purpose

    Create a recovery workflow.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Build an actionable, high-level, recovery workflow that can be adapted to a variety of different scenarios.

    Activities

    3.1 Conduct a tabletop exercise to determine current recovery procedures.

    3.2 Identify and prioritize projects to close gaps and mitigate recovery risks.

    3.3 Evaluate options for command centers and alternate business locations (i.e. BC site).

    Outputs

    Recovery flow diagram – current and future state

    Identify gaps and recovery risks.

    Create a project roadmap to close gaps.

    Evaluate requirements for alternate business sites.

    4 Extend the Results of the Pilot BCP and Implement Governance

    The Purpose

    Extend the results of the pilot BCP and implement governance.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Outline the actions required for the rest of your BCMS, and the required effort to complete those actions, based on the results of the pilot.

    Activities

    4.1 Summarize the accomplishments and required next steps to create an overall BCP.

    4.2 Identify required BCM roles.

    4.3 Create a plan to update and maintain your overall BCP.

    Outputs

    Pilot BCP Executive Presentation

    Business Continuity Team Roles & Responsibilities

    3. Maintenance plan and BCP templates to complete the relevant documentation (BC Policy, BCP Action Items, Recovery Workflow, etc.)

    Further reading

    Develop a Business Continuity Plan

    Streamline the traditional approach to make BCP development manageable and repeatable.

    Analyst Perspective

    A BCP touches every aspect of your organization, making it potentially the most complex project you’ll take on. Streamline this effort or you won’t get far.

    None of us needs to look very far to find a reason to have an effective business continuity plan.

    From pandemics to natural disasters to supply chain disruptions to IT outages, there’s no shortage of events that can disrupt your complex and interconnected business processes. How in the world can anyone build a plan to address all these threats?

    Don’t try to boil the ocean. Use these tactics to streamline your BCP project and stay on track:

    • Focus on one business unit at a time. Keep the effort manageable, establish a repeatable process, and produce deliverables that provide a starting point for the rest of the organization.
    • Don’t start with an extensive risk analysis. It takes too long and at the end you’ll still need a plan to resume business operations following a disruption. Rather than trying to predict what could cause a disruption, focus on how to recover.
    • Keep your BCP documentation concise. Use flowcharts, checklists, and diagrams instead of traditional manuals.

    No one can predict every possible disruption, but by following the guidance in this blueprint, you can build a flexible continuity plan that allows you to withstand the threats your organization may face.

    Frank Trovato

    Research Director,
    IT Infrastructure & Operations Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Andrew Sharp

    Senior Research Analyst,
    IT Infrastructure & Operations Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    • Recent crises have increased executive awareness and internal pressure to create a BCP.
    • Industry- and government-driven regulations require evidence of sound business continuity practices.
    • Customers demand their vendors provide evidence of a workable BCP prior to signing a contract.

    IT leaders, because of their cross-functional view and experience with incident management and DR, are often asked to lead BCP efforts.

    Common Obstacles

    • IT managers asked to lead BCP efforts are dealing with processes and requirements beyond IT and outside of their control.
    • BCP requires input from multiple departments with different and sometimes conflicting objectives.
    • Typically there are few, if any, dedicated resources for BCP, so it can't be a full-time, resource-intensive project.

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    • Focus on implementing a structured and repeatable process that can be applied to one business unit at a time to avoid BCP from becoming an overwhelming project.
    • Enable business leaders to own the BCP going forward by establishing a template that the rest of the organization can follow.
    • Leverage BCP outcomes to refine IT DRP recovery objectives and achieve DRP-BCP alignment.

    Info-Tech Insight

    As an IT leader you have the skill set and organizational knowledge to lead a BCP project, but you must enable business leaders to own their department’s BCP practices and outputs. They know their processes and, therefore, their requirements to resume business operations better than anyone else.

    Use this research to create business unit BCPs and structure your overall BCP

    A business continuity plan (BCP) consists of separate but related sub-plans, as illustrated below. This blueprint enables you to:

    • Develop a BCP for a selected business unit (as a pilot project), and thereby establish a methodology that can be repeated for remaining business units.
    • Through the BCP process, clarify requirements for an IT disaster recovery plan (DRP). Refer to Info-Tech’s Disaster Recovery Planning workshop for instructions on how to create an IT DRP.
    • Implement ongoing business continuity management to govern BCP, DRP, and crisis management.

    Overall Business Continuity Plan

    IT Disaster Recovery Plan

    A plan to restore IT application and infrastructure services following a disruption.

    Info-Tech’s disaster recovery planning blueprint provides a methodology for creating the IT DRP. Leverage this blueprint to validate and provide inputs for your IT DRP.

    BCP for Each Business Unit

    A set of plans to resume business processes for each business unit. This includes:

    • Identifying business processes and dependencies.
    • Defining an acceptable recovery timeline based on a business impact analysis.
    • Creating a step-by-step recovery workflow.

    Crisis Management Plan

    A plan to manage a wide range of crises, from health and safety incidents to business disruptions to reputational damage.

    Info-Tech’s Implement Crisis Management Best Practices blueprint provides a framework for planning a response to any crisis, from health and safety incidents to reputational damage.

    IT leaders asked to develop a BCP should start with an IT Disaster Recovery Plan

    It’s a business continuity plan. Why should you start continuity planning with IT?

    1. IT services are a critical dependency for most business processes. Creating an IT DRP helps you mitigate a key risk to continuity quicker than it takes to complete your overall BCP, and you can then focus on other dependencies such as people, facilities, and suppliers.
    2. A BCP requires workarounds for IT failures. But it’s difficult to plan workarounds without a clear understanding of the potential IT downtime and data loss. Your DRP will answer those questions, and without a DRP, BCP discussions can get bogged down in IT discussions. Think of payroll as an example: if downtime might be 24 hours, the business might simply wait for recovery; if downtime might be a week, waiting it out is not an option.
    3. As an IT manager, you can develop an IT DRP primarily with resources within your control. That makes it an easier starting point and puts IT in a better position to shift responsibility for BCP to business leaders (where it should reside) since essentially the IT portion is done.

    Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan today.

    Modernize the BCP

    If your BCP relies heavily on paper-based processes as workarounds, it’s time to update your plan.

    Back when transactions were recorded on paper and then keyed into the mainframe system later, it was easier to revert to deskside processes. There is very little in the way of paper-based processes anymore, and as a result, it is increasingly difficult to resume business processes without IT.

    Think about your own organization. What IT system(s) are absolutely critical to business operations? While you might be able to continue doing business without IT, this requires regular preparation and training. It’s likely a completely offline process and won’t be a viable workaround for long even if staff know how to do the work. If your data center and core systems are down, technology-enabled workarounds (such as collaboration via mobile technologies or cloud-based solutions) could help you weather the outage, and may be more flexible and adaptable for day-to-day work.

    The bottom line:

    Technology is a critical dependency for business processes. Consider the role IT systems play as process dependencies and as workarounds as part of continuity planning.

    Info-Tech’s approach

    The traditional approach to BCP takes too long and produces a plan that is difficult to use and maintain.

    The Problem: You need to create a BCP, but don’t know where to start.

    • BCP is being demanded more and more to comply with regulations, mitigate business risk, meet customer demands, and obtain insurance.
    • IT leaders are often asked to lead BCP.

    The Complication: A traditional BCP process takes longer to show value.

    • Traditional consultants don’t usually have an incentive to accelerate the process.
    • At the same time, self-directed projects with no defined process go months without producing useful deliverables.
    • The result is a dense manual that checks boxes but isn’t maintainable or usable in a crisis.

    A pie chart is separated into three segments, Internal Mandates 43%, Customer Demands 23%, and Regulatory Requirements 34%. The bottom of the image reads Source: Info-Tech Research Group.

    The Info-Tech difference:

    Use Info-Tech’s methodology to right-size and streamline the process.

    • Reduce required effort. Keep the work manageable and maintain momentum by focusing on one business unit at a time; allow that unit to own their BCP.
    • Prioritize your effort. Evaluate the current state of your BCP to identify the steps that are most in need of attention.
    • Get valuable results faster. Functional deliverables and insights from the first business unit’s BCP can be leveraged by the entire organization (e.g. communication, assessment, and BC site strategies).

    Expedite BCP development

    Info-Tech’s Approach to BCP:

    • Start with one critical business unit to manage scope, establish a repeatable process, and generate deliverables that become a template for remaining business units.
    • Resolve critical gaps as you identify them, generating early value and risk mitigation.
    • Create concise, practical documentation to support recovery.

    Embed training and awareness throughout the planning process.

    BCP for Business Unit A:

    Scope → Pilot BIA → Response Plan → Gap Analysis

    → Lessons Learned:

    • Leverage early results to establish a BCM framework.
    • Take action to resolve critical gaps as they are identified.
    • BCP for Business Units B through N.
    • Scope→BIA→Response Plan→Gap Analysis

    = Ongoing governance, testing, maintenance, improvement, awareness, and training.

    By comparison, a traditional BCP approach takes much longer to mitigate risk:

    • An extensive, upfront commitment of time and resources before defining incident response plans and mitigating risk.
    • A “big bang” approach that makes it difficult to predict the required resourcing and timelines for the project.

    Organizational Risk Assessment and Business Impact Analysis → Solution Design to Achieve Recovery Objectives → Create and Validate Response Plans

    Case Study

    Continuity Planning Supports COVID-19 Response

    Industry: Non-Profit
    Source: Info-Tech Advisory Services

    A charitable foundation for a major state university engaged Info-Tech to support the creation of their business continuity plan.

    With support from Info-Tech analysts and the tools in this blueprint, they worked with their business unit stakeholders to identify recovery objectives, confirm recovery capabilities and business process workarounds, and address gaps in their continuity plans.

    Results

    The outcome wasn’t a pandemic plan – it was a continuity plan that was applicable to pandemics. And it worked. Business processes were prioritized, gaps in work-from-home and business process workarounds had been identified and addressed, business leaders owned their plan and understood their role in it, and IT had clear requirements that they were able and ready to support.

    “The work you did here with us was beyond valuable! I wish I could actually explain how ready we really were for this…while not necessarily for a pandemic, we were ready to spring into action, set things up, the priorities were established, and most importantly some of the changes we’ve made over the past few years helped beyond words! The fact that the groups had talked about this previously almost made what we had to do easy.“ -- VP IT Infrastructure

    Download the BCP Case Study

    Project Overview: BCP

    Phases Phase 1: Identify BCP Maturity and Document Process Dependencies Phase 2: Conduct a BIA to Determine Acceptable RTOs and RPOs Phase 3: Document the Recovery Workflow and Projects to Close Gaps Phase 4: Extend the Results of the Pilot BCP and Implement Governance
    Steps 1.1 Assess current BCP maturity 2.1 Define an objective impact scoring scale 3.1 Determine current recovery procedures 4.1 Consolidate BCP pilot insights to support an overall BCP project plan
    1.2 Establish the pilot BCP team 2.2 Estimate the impact of downtime 3.2 Identify and prioritize projects to close gaps 4.2 Outline a business continuity management (BCM) program
    1.3 Identify business processes, dependencies, and alternatives 2.3 Determine acceptable RTO/RPO targets 3.3 Evaluate BC site and command center options 4.3 Test and maintain your BCP
    Tools and Templates

    BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool

    Results Presentation

    BCP Maturity Scorecard

    Tabletop Planning Template

    BCP Summary

    Pilot Project Charter

    Recovery Workflow Examples

    Business Continuity Teams and Roles

    Business Process Workflows Examples

    BCP Project Roadmap

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool: Conduct and document a business impact analysis using this document.

    BCP Recovery Workflows Example: Model your own recovery workflows on this example.

    BCP Project Roadmap: Use this tool to prioritize projects that can improve BCP capabilities and mitigate gaps and risks.

    BCP Relocation Checklists: Plan for and manage a site relocation – whether to an alternate site or work from home.

    Key deliverable:

    BCP Summary Document

    Summarize your organization's continuity capabilities and objectives in a 15-page, easy-to-consume template.

    This document consolidates data from the supporting documentation and tools to the right.

    Download Info-Tech’s BCP Summary Document

    Insight summary

    Focus less on risk, and more on recovery

    Avoid focusing on risk and probability analysis to drive your continuity strategy. You never know what might disrupt your business, so develop a flexible plan to enable business resumption regardless of the event.

    Small teams = good pilots

    Choose a small team for your BCP pilot. Small teams are better at trialing new techniques and finding new ways to think about problems.

    Calculate downtime impact

    Develop and apply a scoring scale to develop a more-objective assessment of downtime impact for the organization. This will help you prioritize recovery.

    It’s not no, but rather not now…

    You can’t address all the organization’s continuity challenges at once. Prioritize high value, low effort initiatives and create a long-term roadmap for the rest.

    Show Value Now

    Get to value quickly. Start with one business unit with continuity challenges, and a small, focused project team who can rapidly learn the methodology, identify continuity gaps, and define solutions that can also be leveraged by other departments right away.

    Lightweight Testing Exercises

    Outline recovery capabilities using lightweight, low risk tabletop planning exercises. Our research shows tabletop exercises increase confidence in recovery capabilities almost as much as live exercises, which carry much higher costs and risks.

    Blueprint benefits

    Demonstrate compliance with demands from regulators and customers

    • Develop a plan that satisfies auditors, customers, and insurance providers who demand proof of a continuity plan.
    • Demonstrate commitment to resilience by identifying gaps in current capabilities and projects to overcome those gaps.
    • Empower business users to develop their plans and perform regular maintenance to ensure plans don’t go stale.
    • Establish a culture of business readiness and resilience.

    Leverage your BCP to drive value (Business Benefits)

    • Enable flexible, mobile, and adaptable business operations that can overcome disruptions large and small. This includes making it easier to work remotely in response to pandemics or facility disruptions.
    • Clarify the risk of the status quo to business leaders so they can make informed decisions on where to invest in business continuity.
    • Demonstrate to customers your ability to overcome disruptions and continue to deliver your services.

    Info-Tech Advisory Services lead to Measurable Value

    Info-Tech members told us they save an average of $44,522 and 23 days by working with an Info-Tech analyst on BCP (source: client response data from Info-Tech's Measured Value Survey).

    Why do members report value from analyst engagement?

    1. Expert advice on your specific situation to overcome obstacles and speed bumps.
    2. Structure the project and stay on track.
    3. Review project deliverables and ensure the process is applied properly.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful."

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

    Workshop

    “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

    Consulting

    “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostic and consistent frameworks are used throughout all four options.

    Guided Implementation

    Your Trusted Advisor is a call away.

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is between eight to twelve calls over the course of four to six months.

    Scoping

    Call 1: Scope requirements, objectives, and stakeholders. Identify a pilot BCP project.

    Business Processes and Dependencies

    Calls 2 - 4: Assess current BCP maturity. Create business process workflows, dependencies, alternates, and workarounds.

    Conduct a BIA

    Calls 5 – 7: Create an impact scoring scale and conduct a BIA. Identify acceptable RTO and RPO.

    Recovery Workflow

    Calls 8 – 9: Create a recovery workflow based on tabletop planning.

    Documentation & BCP Framework

    Call 10: Summarize the pilot results and plan next steps. Define roles and responsibilities. Make the case for a wider BCP program.

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.

    workshops@infotech.com | 1-888-670-8889

    Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
    Identify BCP Maturity, Key Processes, and Dependencies Conduct a BIA to Determine Acceptable RTOs and RPOs Document the Current Recovery Workflow and Projects to Close Gaps Identify Remaining BCP Documentation and Next Steps Next Steps and Wrap-Up (offsite)
    Activities

    1.1 Assess current BCP maturity.

    1.2 Identify key business processes to include in scope.

    1.3 Create a flowchart for key business processes to identify business processes, dependencies, and alternatives.

    2.1 Define an objective scoring scale to indicate different levels of impact.

    2.2 Estimate the impact of a business disruption on cost, goodwill, compliance, and health & safety.

    2.3 Determine acceptable RTOs/RPOs for selected business processes based on business impact.

    3.1 Review tabletop planning – what is it, how is it done?

    3.2 Walk through a business disruption scenario to determine your current recovery timeline, RTO/RPO gaps, and risks to your ability to resume business operations.

    3.3 Identify and prioritize projects to close RTO/RPO gaps and mitigate recovery risks.

    4.1 Assign business continuity management (BCM) roles to govern BCP development and maintenance, as well as roles required to execute recovery.

    4.2 Identify remaining documentation required for the pilot business unit and how to leverage the results to repeat the methodology for remaining business units.

    4.3 Workshop review and wrap-up.

    5.1 Finalize deliverables for the workshop.

    5.2 Set up review time for workshop outputs and to discuss next steps.

    Deliverables
    1. Baseline BCP maturity status
    2. Business process flowcharts
    3. Business process dependencies and alternatives recorded in the BIA tool
    1. Potential impact of a business disruption quantified for selected business processes.
    2. Business processes criticality and recovery priority defined
    3. Acceptable RTOs/RPOs defined based on business impact
    1. Current-state recovery workflow and timeline.
    2. RTO/RPO gaps identified.
    3. BCP project roadmap to close gaps
    1. BCM roles and responsibilities defined
    2. Workshop results deck; use this to communicate pilot results and next steps
    1. Finalized deliverables

    Phase 1

    Identify BCP Maturity and Document Process Dependencies

    Phase 1

    1.1 Assess Current BCP Maturity

    1.2 Establish the pilot BCP team

    1.3 Identify business processes, dependencies, and alternatives

    Insights & Outcomes

    Define the scope for the BCP project: assess the current state of the plan, create a pilot project team and pilot project charter, and map the business processes that will be the focus of the pilot.

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator
    • BCP Executive Sponsor
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager & Process SMEs

    Step 1.1

    Assess current BCP Maturity

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Complete Info-Tech’s BCP Maturity Scorecard

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Executive Sponsor
    • BCP Coordinator

    You'll use the following tools & templates:

    Outcomes & Insights

    Establish current BCP maturity using Info-Tech’s ISO 22301-aligned BCP Maturity Scorecard.

    Evaluate the current state of your continuity plan

    Use Info-Tech’s Maturity Scorecard to structure and accelerate a BCP maturity assessment.

    Conduct a maturity assessment to:

    • Create a baseline metric so you can measure progress over time. This metric can also drive buy-in from senior management to invest time and effort into your BCP.
    • Understand the scope of work to create a complete business continuity plan.
    • Measure your progress and remaining gaps by updating your assessment once you’ve completed the activities in this blueprint.

    This blueprint primarily addresses the first four sections in the scorecard, which align with the creation of the core components of your business continuity plan.

    Info-Tech’s BCP Maturity Scorecard

    Info-Tech’s maturity scorecard is aligned with ISO 22301, the international standard that describes the key elements of a functioning business continuity management system or program – the overarching set of documents, practices, and controls that support the ongoing creation and maintenance of your BCP. A fully functional BCMS goes beyond business continuity planning to include crisis management, BCP testing, and documentation management.

    Audit tools tend to treat every bullet point in ISO 22301 as a separate requirement – which means there’s almost 400 lines to assess. Info-Tech’s BCP Maturity Scorecard has synthesized key requirements, minimizing repetition to create a high-level self-assessment aligned with the standard.

    A high score is a good indicator of likely success with an audit.

    Download Info-Tech's BCP Maturity Scorecard

    Tool: BCP Maturity Scorecard

    Assess your organization’s BCP capabilities.

    Use Info-Tech’s BCP Maturity Scorecard to:

    • Assess the overall completeness of your existing BCP.
    • Track and demonstrate progress towards completion as you work through successive planning iterations with additional business units.
    1. Download a copy of the BCP Maturity Scorecard. On tab 1, indicate the percent completeness for each item using a 0-10 scale (0 = 0% complete, 10 = 100% complete).
    2. If you anticipate improvements in a certain area, make note of it in the “Comments” column.
    3. Review a visual representation of your overall scores on tab 2.

    Download Info-Tech's BCP Maturity Scorecard

    "The fact that this aligns with ISO is huge." - Dr. Bernard Jones MBCI, CBCP

    Step 1.2

    Establish the pilot BCP team

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Assign accountability, responsibility, and roles.
    • Develop a project charter.
    • Identify dependencies and alternates for those dependencies.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Executive Sponsor
    • BCP Coordinator

    In this step, you’ll use these tools and templates:

    Outcomes & Insights

    Assign roles and responsibilities for the BCP pilot project. Set milestones and timelines for the pilot.

    Take a pilot approach for BCP

    Limit the scope of an initial BCP project to get to value faster.

    Pilot Project Goals

    • Establish a repeatable methodology that fits your organization and will accelerate BCP development, with tangible deliverables that provide a template for the rest of the business.
    • Identify high-priority business continuity gaps for the pilot business unit, many of which will also apply to the overall organization.
    • Identify initiatives to start addressing gaps now.
    • Enable business users to learn the BCP methodology and toolset so they can own and maintain their business unit BCPs.

    Accomplishments expected:

    • Define key business processes and process dependencies, and alternatives if dependencies are not available.
    • Classify key business processes by criticality for one business unit, using an objective impact scoring scale.
    • Set recovery objectives for these key processes.
    • Document workarounds and recovery plans.
    • Identify gaps in recovery plans and list action items to mitigate risks.
    • Develop a project plan to structure a larger continuity project.

    What not to expect from a pilot project:

    • A complete organizational BCP (the pilot is a strong starting point).
    • Implemented solutions to all BCP gaps (proposed solutions will need to be evaluated first).

    Structure IT’s role in continuity planning

    Clearly define IT’s role in the pilot BCP project to deliver a successful result that enables business units to own BCP in the future.

    Though IT is a critical dependency for most processes, IT shouldn’t own the business continuity plan. IT should be an internal BCP process consultant, and each business unit must own their plan.

    IT should be an internal BCP consultant.

    • IT departments interact with all business units, which gives IT leaders at least a high-level understanding of business operations across the organization.
    • IT leaders typically also have at least some knowledge of disaster recovery, which provides a foundation for tackling BCP.
    • By contrast, business leaders often have little or no experience with disaster recovery, and don’t have the same level of experience as IT when it comes to working with other business units.

    Why shouldn’t IT own the plan?

    • Business unit managers have the authority to direct resources in their department to participate in the BCP process.
    • Business users are the experts in their processes, and are in the best position to identify dependencies, downtime impacts, recovery objectives, and viable solutions (e.g., acceptable alternate sites or process workarounds).
    • Ultimately, business unit managers and executives must decide whether to mitigate, accept, or transfer risks.

    Info-Tech Insight

    A goal of the pilot is to seed success for further planning exercises. This is as much about demonstrating the value of continuity planning to the business unit, and enabling them to own it, as it is about implementing the methodology successfully.

    Create a RACI matrix for the pilot

    Assemble a small, focused team for the pilot project empowered to discover, report, and present possible solutions to continuity planning challenges in your organization.

    Outline roles and responsibilities on the pilot team using a “RACI” exercise. Remember, only one party can be ultimately accountable for the work being completed.

    Example Pilot BCP Project RACI

    Board Executive Team BCP Executive Sponsor BCP Team Leader BCP Coordinator Pilot Bus. Unit Manager Expert Bus. Unit Staff IT Manager
    Communicate BCP project status I I I A R C C I
    Assign resources to pilot BCP project A R C R C R
    Conduct continuity planning activities I A/R R R R R
    Create pilot BCP deliverables I A R R C C C
    Manage BCP documentation I A C R I C C
    Integrate results into BCMS I I A R R I C C
    Create overall BCP project plan I I A R C C

    R: Responsible for doing the work.

    A: Accountable to ensure the activity/work happens.

    C: Consulted prior to decision or action.

    I: Informed of the decision/action once it’s made.

    "Large teams excel at solving problems, but it is small teams that are more likely to come up with new problems for their more sizable counterparts to solve." – Wang & Evans, 2019

    Info-Tech Insight

    Small teams tend to be better at trialing new techniques and finding new ways to think about problems, both of which are needed for a BCP pilot project.

    Choose one business unit for the pilot

    Many organizations begin their BCP project with a target business unit in mind. It’s still worth establishing whether this business unit meets the criteria below.

    Good candidates for a pilot project:

    • Business processes are standardized and documented.
    • Management and staff are motivated to improve business continuity.
    • The business unit is sufficiently well resourced to spare time (e.g. a few hours a week) to dedicate to the BCP process.
    • If the business unit doesn’t meet these criteria, consider addressing shortfalls before the pilot (e.g. via stakeholder management or business process analysis) or selecting another unit.
    • Many of the decisions will ultimately require input and support from the business unit’s manager(s). It is critical that they are bought into and engaged with the project.
    • The leader of the first business unit will be a champion for BCP within the executive team.
    • Sometimes, there’s no clear place to start. If this is the case for you, consider using Info-Tech’s Business Unit BCP Prioritization Tool to determine the order in which business units should undergo BCP development.

    Create role descriptions for the pilot project

    Use these role descriptions and your RACI chart to define roles for the pilot.

    These short descriptions establish the functions, expectations, and responsibilities of each role at a more granular level.

    The Board and executives have an outsized influence on the speed at which the project can be completed. Ensure that communication with these stakeholders is clear and concise. Avoid involving them directly in activities and deliverable creation, unless it’s required by their role (e.g. as a business unit manager).

    Project Role Description
    Board & Executive Team
    • Will receive project status updates but are not directly involved in deliverable creation.
    Executive Sponsor
    • Liaison with the executive team.
    • Accountable to ensure the pilot BCP is completed.
    • Set project goals and approve resource allocation and funding.
    Pilot Business Unit Manager
    • Drive the project and assign required resources.
    • Delegate day-to-day project management tasks to the BCP Coordinator.
    BCP Coordinator
    • Function as the project manager. This includes scheduling activities, coordinating resources, reporting progress, and managing deliverables.
    • Learn and apply the BCP methodology to achieve project goals.
    Expert Business Unit Staff
    • Pilot business unit process experts to assist with BCP development for that business unit.
    IT Manager
    • Provide guidance on IT capabilities and recovery options.
    Other Business Unit Managers
    • Consulted to validate or provide input to the business impact analysis and RTOs/RPOs.

    Identify a suitable BCP Coordinator

    A skilled and committed coordinator is critical to building an effective and durable BCP.

    • Coordinating the BC planning effort requires a perspective that’s informed by IT, but goes beyond IT.
    • For example, many IT professionals only see business processes where they intersect with IT. The BCP Coordinator needs to be able to ask the right questions to help the business units think through dependencies for critical processes.
    • Business analysts can thrive in this role, which requires someone effective at dissecting business processes, working with business users, identifying requirements, and managing large projects.

    Structure the role of the BCP Coordinator

    The BCP Coordinator works with the pilot business unit as well as remaining business units to provide continuity and resolve discrepancies as they come up between business units.

    Specifically, this role includes:

    • Project management tasks (e.g. scheduling, assigning tasks, coordinating resources, and reporting progress).
    • Learning the BCP methodology (through the pilot) so that this person can lead remaining business units through their BCP process. This enables the IT leader who had been assigned to guide BCP development to step back into a more appropriate consulting role.
    • Managing the BCP workflow.

    "We found it necessary to have the same person work with each business unit to pass along lessons learned and resolve contingency planning conflicts for common dependencies." – Michelle Swessel, PM and IT Bus. Analyst, Wisconsin Compensation Rating Bureau (WCRB)

    Template: Pilot Project Charter

    Formalize participants, roles, milestones, risks for the pilot project.

    Your charter should:

    1. Define project parameters, including drivers, objectives, deliverables, and scope.
    2. Identify the pilot business unit.
    3. Assign a BCP pilot team, including a BCP Coordinator, to execute the methodology.
    4. Define before-and-after metrics to enable the team to measure pilot success.
    5. Set achievable, realistic target dates for specific project milestones.
    6. Document risks, assumptions, and constraints.

    Download Info-Tech’s BCP Pilot Project Charter Template

    Step 1.3

    Identify business processes, dependencies, and alternatives

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify key business processes.
    • Document the process workflow.
    • Identify dependencies and alternates for those dependencies.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • BCP Coordinator
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    • Expert Business Unit Staff

    You'll use the following tools & templates:

    Outcomes & Insights

    Documented workflows, process dependencies, and workarounds when dependencies are unavailable.

    Flowchart business processes

    Workflows help you visually identify process dependencies and optimization opportunities.

    • Business continuity planning is business process focused. You need to document business processes, dependencies, and downtime workarounds.
    • Process documentation is a basic BCP audit requirement, but it will also:
      • Keep discussions about business processes well-scoped and focused – by documenting the process, you also clarify for everyone what you’re actually talking about.
      • Remind participants of process dependencies and workarounds.
      • Make it easier to spot possible process breakdowns or improvements.
      • Capture your work, which can be used to create or update SOP documentation.
    • Use flowcharts to capture process workflows. Flowcharts are often quicker to create, take less time to update, and are ultimately more usable than a dense manual.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Process review often results in discovering informal processes, previously unknown workarounds or breakdowns, shadow IT, or process improvement opportunities.

    1.3.1 Prioritize pilot business unit processes

    Input

    • List of key business unit processes.

    Output

    • List of key business unit processes, now prioritized (at a high-level)

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator (leads the discussion)
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager

    30 minutes

    1. Create a list of all formal and informal business processes executed by the pilot business unit.
    2. Discuss the impact of process downtime, and do a quick assessment whether impact of downtime for each process would be high, medium, or low across each of these criteria:
      • Revenue or costs (e.g. supports sales, billing, or productivity)
      • Goodwill (e.g. affects internal or external reputation)
      • Compliance (e.g. affects legal or industry requirements)
      • Health or safety (e.g. affects employee/public health & safety)

    Note: A more in-depth analysis will be conducted later to refine priorities. The goal here is a high-level order of priority for the next steps in the planning methodology (identify business processes and dependencies).

    1. In the BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool, Processes and Dependencies tab, record the following:
      • The business processes in rough order of criticality.
      • For each process, provide a brief description that focuses on purpose and impact.
      • For each process, name a process owner (i.e. accountable for process completion – could be a manager or senior staff, not necessarily those executing the process).

    1.3.2 Review process flows & identify dependencies

    Input

    • List of key business unit processes (prioritized at a high level in Activity 1.3.1).
    • Business process flowcharts.

    Output

    • Business process flowcharts

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Microsoft Visio, or other flowcharting software
    • BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool

    Download Info-Tech’s Business Process Workflows Example

    1.5 hours

    1. Use a whiteboard to flowchart process steps. Collaborate to clarify process steps and dependencies. If processes are not documented, use this as an opportunity to create standard operating procedures (SOPs) to drive consistency and process optimization, as described in the Info-Tech blueprint, Create Visual SOP Documents that Drive Process Optimization, Not Just Peace of Mind.
    2. Record the dependencies in tab 1 of the BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool in the appropriate columns:
      • People – Anyone involved in the process, from providing guidance to executing the steps.
      • IT Applications – Core IT services (e.g. ERP, CRM) required for this process.
      • End-user devices & equipment – End-user devices, locally-installed apps, IoT, etc.
      • Facility – Any special requirements beyond general office space.
      • Suppliers & Service Providers – Third-parties who support this process.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Policies and procedures manuals, if they exist, are often out of date or incomplete. Use these as a starting point, but don’t stop there. Identify the go-to staff members who are well versed in how a process works.

    1.3.3 Document workarounds

    Input

    • Business process flowcharts.
    • List of process dependencies.

    Output

    • Workarounds and alternatives in the event dependencies aren’t available.

    Materials

    • BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator (facilitates the activity)
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    • Business Process Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)

    1.5 hours

    Identify alternatives to critical dependencies to help you create contingency plans.

    1. For each business process, identify known alternatives for each primary dependency. Ignore for the moment how long the workaround or alternate would be feasible.
    2. Record alternatives in the Business Continuity Business Impact Analysis Tool, Processes and Dependencies tab, Alternatives columns (a separate column for each category of dependency):
      • People – Can other staff execute the process steps? (Example: managers can step in if needed.)
      • IT Applications – Is there a manual workaround or other alternative while enterprise technology services are unavailable? (Example: database is down, but data is stored on physical forms.)
      • End-User Devices and Equipment – What alternatives exist to the usual end-user technologies, such as workstations and desk phones? (Example: some staff have cell phones.)
      • Facility Location and Requirements – Is there an alternate location where this work can be conducted? (Example: work from home, or from another building on the campus.)
      • Suppliers and External Services – Is there an alternative source for key suppliers or other external inputs? (Example: find alternate suppliers for key inputs.)
      • Additional Inputs or Requirements – What workarounds exist for additional artifacts that enable process steps (e.g. physical inventory records, control lists)? (Example: if hourly pay information is missing, run the same payroll as the previous run and reconcile once that information is available.)

    Phase 2

    Conduct a BIA to Determine Acceptable RTOs and RPOs

    Phase 2

    2.1 Define an objective impact scoring scale

    2.2 Estimate the impact of downtime

    2.3 Determine acceptable RTO/RPO targets

    Insights & Outcomes

    Assess the impact of business process downtime using objective, customized impact scoring scales. Sort business processes by criticality and by assigning criticality tiers, recovery time, and recovery point objectives.

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    • Business Process SMEs

    Step 2.1

    Define an objective scoring scale

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify impact criteria that are relevant to your business.
    • Create a scale that defines a range of impact for relevant criteria.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • BCP Coordinator
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    • Expert Business Unit Staff

    In this step, you’ll use these tools and templates:

    Outcomes & Insights

    Define an impact scoring scale relevant to your business, which allows you to more-objectively assess the impact of business process downtime.

    Set appropriate recovery objectives

    Recovery time and recovery point objectives should align with business impact.

    The activities in Phase 2 will help you set appropriate, acceptable recovery objectives based on the business impact of process downtime.

    • The recovery time objective (RTO) and recovery point objective (RPO) are the recovery goals set for individual processes and dependencies to ensure your business unit meets its overall acceptable recovery timeline.

    For example:

    • An RTO of four hours means staff and other required resources must be available to support the business processes within four hours of an incident (e.g. relocate to an alternate worksite if necessary, access needed equipment, log-in to needed systems, get support for completing the process from alternate staff, etc.)
    • An RPO of four hours for a customer database means the most recent secondary copy of the data must never be more than four hours old – e.g. running a backup every four hours or less.

    Conduct a Business Impact Analysis (BIA)

    Create Impact Scoring Scales→Assess the impact of process downtime→Review overall impact of process downtime→Set Criticality Tiers→Set Recovery Time and Recovery Point Objectives

    Create financial impact scales

    Identify maximum cost and revenue impacts to build financial impact scales to measure the financial impact of process downtime.

    Work with the Business Unit Manager and Executive Sponsor to identify the maximum impact in each category to the entire business. Use a worst-case scenario to estimate the maximum for each scale. In the future, you can use this scoring scale to estimate the impact of downtime for other business units.

    • Loss of Revenue: Estimate the upper bound for this figure from the previous year, and divide that by the number of business days in the year. Note: Some organizations may choose to exclude revenue as a category where it won’t be lost (e.g. public-sector organizations).
    • Loss of Productivity: Proxy for lost workforce productivity using payroll numbers. Use the fully loaded payroll for the company, divided by the number of working days in the year as the maximum.
    • Increased Operating Costs: Isolate this to known additional costs resulting from a disruption. Does the interruption itself increase operating costs (e.g. if using timesheets for hourly/contract employees and that information is lost or unavailable, do you assume a full work week)?
    • Financial Penalties: If there are known financial penalties (e.g. due to failure to meet SLAs or other contractual obligations), include those values in your cost estimates.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Cost estimates are like hand grenades and horseshoes: you don’t need to be exact. It’s much easier to get input and validation from other stakeholders when you have estimates. Even weak estimates are far better than a blank sheet.

    Create goodwill, compliance, and safety impact scales

    Create a quantitative, more-objective scoring scale for goodwill, compliance and safety by following the guidance below.

    • Impact on Customers: By default, the customer impact scale is based on the percent of your total customer base impacted. You can also modify this scale to include severity of impact or alter it to identify the maximum number of customers that would be impacted.
    • Impact on Staff: Consider staff that are directly employed by the organization or its subsidiaries.
    • Impact on Business Partners: Which business partners would be affected by a business disruption?
    • Impact on Health & Safety: Consider the extent to which process downtime could increase the risk of the health & safety of staff, customers, and the general public. In addition, degradation of health & safety services should be noted.
    • Impact on Compliance: Set up the scale so that you can capture the impact of any critical regulatory requirements that might not be met if a particular process was down for 24 hours. Consider whether you expect to receive leeway or a grace period from the governance body that requires evidence of compliance.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Use just the impact scales that are relevant to your organization.

    Tool: Impact Scoring Scales

    • Define 4-point scoring scales in the BCP business impact analysis tool for a more objective assessment than gut-feel rankings.
    • You don’t need to include every category, if they aren’t relevant to your organization.
    • Refine the scoring scale as needed through the pilot project.
    • Use the same scoring scale for impact analyses with additional business units in the future.

    An image depicting the Business Impact Analysis Tool. A note pointing to the Level of Impact and Direct Cost Impact Scales columns states: Add the maximum cost impacts across each of the four impact scales to the tool. The rest of the scale will auto-populate based on the criteria outlined in the “Level of Impact” column. A note pointing to the column headers states: Change the names of the column headers in this tab. The changes to column headers will populate across the rest of the tool. Indicate exclusions from the scale here. A note pointing to the Goodwill Impact Scales columns reads: Update the Goodwill impact scales. For example, perhaps a critical impact on customers could be defined as “a significant impact on all customers using the organization’s services in a 24-hour period.” A note pointing to the Compliance, Heath and Safety Impact Scales columns reads: Review the compliance and safety impact scales, and update as required.

    Step 2.2

    Estimate the impact of downtime

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Apply the scoring scale developed in step 2.1 to assess the impact of downtime for specific business processes.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • BCP Coordinator
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    • Expert Business Unit Staff

    In this step, you’ll use these tools and templates:

    Outcomes & Insights

    Develop an objective view of the impact of downtime for key business processes.

    2.2.1 Estimate the impact of downtime

    1.5 hours

    Input

    • List of business processes, dependencies, and workarounds, all documented in the BIA tool.

    Output

    • Impact of downtime scores for key business unit processes.

    Materials

    • BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator (facilitates the discussion)
    • Business Process Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    1. Print a copy of the Scoring Criteria tab to use as a reference, or have it open on another screen. In tab 3 of the BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool use the drop-down menu to assign a score of 0 to 4 based on levels of impact defined in the Scoring Criteria tab.
    2. Work horizontally across all categories for a single process. This will set a benchmark, familiarize you with the scoring system, and allow you to modify any scoring scales if needed. In general, begin with the process that you know to be most critical.
      • For example, if call center sales operations are down:
        • Loss of Revenue would be the portion of sales revenue generated through the call center. This might score a 2 or 3 depending on the proportion of sales generated through the call center.
        • The Impact on Customers might be a 1 or 2 depending on the extent that existing customers might be using the call center to purchase new products or services.
        • The Legal/Regulatory Compliance and Health or Safety Risk might be a 0.
    3. Next, work vertically across all processes within a single category. This will allow you to compare scores within the category as you create them.

    Tool: Impact Analysis

    • The goal of the exercise is to arrive at a defensible ranking of process criticality, based on the impact of downtime.
    • Make sure participants can see the scores you’re assigning during the exercise (e.g. by writing out the scores on a whiteboard, or displaying the tool on a projector or screen) and can reference the scoring scales tab to understand what the scores mean.
    • Take notes to record the rationale behind the impact scores. Consider assigning note-taking duties to one of the participants.

    An image of the Impact Analysis Tool. A note pointing to the column headings states: Any customized column headings from tab 2, Scoring Criteria are automatically ported to this tab. A note pointing to the Impact on Goodwill columns reads: Score each application across each scoring scale from 0 to 4. Be sure to refer back to the scoring scale defined in tab 2. Have the scoring scale printed out, written on a whiteboard, or displayed on a separate screen. A note pointing to the tool's dropdown boxes states: Score categories using the drop-down boxes. A note pointing to the centre columns reads: Ignore scoring for categories you choose to exclude. You can hide these columns to clean up the tool if needed.

    2.2.2 Sort processes into Criticality Tiers

    30 minutes

    Input

    • Processes, with assigned impact scores (financial impact, goodwill impact, compliance and safety impact).

    Output

    • Business processes sorted into criticality tiers, based on the impact of downtime.

    Materials

    • BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator (facilitates the discussion)
    • Business Process Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    1. In general, consider the Total Impact on Goodwill, Compliance, and Safety first.
      • An effective tactic to start the process is to assign a tier 1 rating to all processes with a Goodwill, Compliance, and Safety score that’s 50% or more of the highest total score, tier 2 where scores are between 25% and 50%, and tier 3 where scores are below 25% (see table below for an example).
      • In step 2.3, you’ll align recovery time objectives with the criticality tiers. So, Tier 1 processes will target recovery before Tier 2 processes, and Tier 2 processes will target recovery before Tier 3 processes.
    2. Next, consider the Total Cost of Downtime.
    • The Total Cost is calculated by the tool based on the Scoring Criteria in tab 2 and the estimates in the BIA.
    • Consider whether the total cost impact justifies changing the criticality rating. “Smoke test” categorization with participants. Are there any surprises (processes more or less critical than expected)?
  • If the categorization doesn’t seem right, check that the scoring scale was applied consistently.
  • Example: Highest total Goodwill, Compliance, and Safety impact score is 18.

    Tier Score Range % of high score
    Tier 1 - Gold 9-18 50-100%
    Tier 2 - Silver 5 to 9 25-50%
    Tier 3 - Bronze 0 to 5 0-25%

    Step 2.3

    Determine acceptable RTO and RPO targets

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify acceptable Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs) and Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs) for business processes.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • BCP Coordinator
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    • Expert Business Unit Staff

    In this step, you’ll use these tools and templates:

    Outcomes and Insights

    Right-size recovery objectives based on business impact.

    Right-size recovery objectives

    Acceptable RTOs and RPOs must be right-sized to the impact of downtime.

    Rapid recovery typically requires more investment.

    The impact of downtime for most business processes tends to look something like the increasing impact curve in the image to the right.

    In the moments after a disruption, impact tends to be minimal. Imagine, for example, that your organization was suddenly unable to pay its suppliers (don’t worry about the reason for the disruption, for the moment). Chances are, this disruption wouldn’t affect many payees if it lasted just a few minutes, or even a few hours. But if the disruption were to continue for days, or weeks, the impact of downtime would start to spiral out of control.

    In general, we want to target recovery somewhere between the point where impact begins, and the point where impact is intolerable. We want to balance the impact of downtime with the investment required to make processes more resilient.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Account for hard copy files as well as electronic data. If that information is lost, is there a backup? BCP can be the driver to remove the last resistance to paperless processes, allowing IT to apply appropriate data protection.

    Set recovery time objectives and recovery point objectives in the “Debate Space”

    A graph with the X axis labelled as: Increasing downtime/data loss and the Y-axis labelled Increasing Impact. The graph shows a line rising as impact and downtime/data loss increase, with the lowest end of the line (on the left) labelled as minimal impact, and the highest point of the line (on the right) labelled maximum tolerance. The middle section of the line is labelled as the Debate Space, and a note reads: Acceptable RTO/RPO must be between Low Impact and Maximum Tolerance

    2.3.1 Define process-level recovery objectives

    1 hour

    Input

    • Processes, ranked by criticality.

    Output

    • Initial business-defined recovery objectives for each process.

    Materials

    • BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator (facilitates the discussion)
    • Business Process Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    1. Review the “Debate Space” diagram (shown in previous section) with all participants.
    2. Ask business participants for each process: how much downtime is tolerable, acceptable, or appropriate? How much data loss is tolerable?
      • If participants aren’t yet comfortable setting recovery objectives, identify the point at which downtime and data loss first becomes noticeable and the point at which downtime and data loss becomes intolerable.
      • Choose an RTO and RPO for each process that falls within the range set by these two extremes.

    RTOs and RPOs are business-defined, impact-aligned objectives that you may not be able to achieve today. It may require significant investments of time and capital to enable the organization to meet RTO and RPO.

    2.3.2 Align RTOs within and across criticality tiers

    1 hour

    Input

    • Results from pilot BCP impact analysis.

    Output

    • Initial business-defined recovery objectives for each process.

    Materials

    • BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool
    • Whiteboard/ flipchart

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator
    • BCP Project Sponsor
    • Business Process Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager (optional)

    Set a range for RTO for each Tier.

    1. Start with your least critical/Tier 3 processes. Use the filter in the “Criticality Rating” column in the Impact Analysis tab of the BIA tool to show only Tier 3 processes.
      • What range of RTOs did the group assign for processes in this Tier? Does the group agree that these targets are appropriate for these processes?
      • Record the range of RTOs on the whiteboard or flipchart.
    2. Next, look at Tier 2 processes. Use the same filter to show just Tier 2 processes.
      • Record the range of RTOs, confirm the range with the group, and ensure there’s no overlap with the Tier 3 range.
      • If the RTOs in one Tier overlap with RTOs in another, you’ll need to adjust RTOs or move processes between Tiers (if the impact analysis justifies it).
    Tier RTO
    Tier 1 4 hrs- 24 hrs
    Tier 2 24 hrs - 72 hrs
    Tier 3 72 hrs - 120 hrs

    Phase 3

    Document the Recovery Workflow and Projects to Close Gaps

    3.1 Determine current recovery procedures

    3.2 Identify and prioritize projects to close gaps

    3.3 Evaluate business continuity site and command center options

    Insights & Outcomes

    Outline business recovery processes. Highlight gaps and risks that could hinder business recovery. Brainstorm ideas to address gaps and risks. Review alternate site and business relocation options.

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    • Business Process SMEs

    Step 3.1

    Determine current recovery procedures

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Create a step-by-step, high-level recovery workflow.
    • Highlight gaps and risks in the recovery workflow.
    • Test the workflow against multiple scenarios.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • BCP Coordinator
    • Crisis Management Team
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    • Expert Business Unit Staff

    In this step, you’ll use these tools and templates:

    Outcomes & Insights

    Establish steps required for business recovery and current recovery timelines.

    Identify risks & gaps that could delay or obstruct an effective recovery.

    Conduct a tabletop planning exercise to draft business recovery plans

    Tabletop exercises are the most effective way to test and increase business confidence in business recovery capabilities.

    Why is tabletop planning so effective?

    • It enables you play out a wider range of scenarios than technology-based testing (e.g. full-scale, parallel) due to cost and complexity factors.
    • It is non-intrusive, so it can be executed more frequently than other testing methodologies.
    • It provides a thorough test of your recovery workflow since the exercise is, essentially, paper-based.
    • After you have a BCP in place, this exercise can continue to be a valuable testing exercise for BCP to capture changes in your recovery process.

    A graph titled: Tabletop planning had the greatest impact on respondent confidence in meeting recovery objectives. The graph shows that the relative importance of Tabletop Planning is 57%, compared to 33% for Unit Testing, 3% for Simulation Testing, 6% for Parallel Testing, and 2% for Full-Scale Testing. The source for the graph is Info-Tech Research Group.

    Step 2 - 2 hours
    Establish command center.

    Step 2: Risks

    • Command center is just 15 miles away from primary site.

    Step 2: Gaps

    • Confirm what’s required to set up the command center.
    • Who has access to the EOC?
    • Does the center have sufficient bandwidth, workstations, phones, telephone lines?

    3.1.1 Choose a scenario for your first tabletop exercise

    30 minutes

    Input

    • List of past incidents.
    • Risks to business continuity that are of high concern.

    Output

    • Scenario for the tabletop exercise.

    Materials

    • N/A

    Participant

    • BCP Coordinator (facilitates the exercise)
    • Business Process Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)
    • Pilot business unit manager

    At the business unit level, the goal is to define a plan to resume business processes after an incident.

    A good scenario is one that helps the group focus on the goal of tabletop planning – to discuss and document the steps required to recover business processes. We suggest choosing a scenario for your first exercise that:

    • Disrupts many process dependencies (i.e. facilities, staff, IT services, suppliers).
    • Does not result in major property damage, harm, or loss of life. Business resumption is the focus of this exercise, not emergency response.
    • Has happened in the past, or is of concern to the business.

    An example: a gas leak at company HQ that requires the area to be cordoned off and power to be shut down. The business must resume processes from another location without access to materials, equipment, or IT services at the primary location.

    A plan that satisfies the gas leak scenario should meet the needs of other scenarios that affect your normal workspace. Then use BCP testing to validate that the plan meets a wider range of incidents.

    3.1.2 Define the BCP activation process

    1 hour

    Input

    • Any existing crisis management, incident response or emergency response plans.
    • BC Scenario.

    Output

    • High level incident notification, assessment, and declaration workflow.

    Materials

    • Cue cards, sticky notes, whiteboard and markers, or Visio template.

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator
    • Crisis Management Team (if one exists)
    • Business Process SMEs
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager

    Answer the questions below to structure your notification, assessment, and BCP activation procedures.

    Notification

    How will you be notified of a disaster event? How will this be escalated to leadership? How will the team responsible for making decisions coordinate (if they can’t meet on-site)? What emergency response plans are in place to protect health and safety? What additional steps are involved if there’s a risk to health and safety?

    Assessment

    Who’s in charge of the initial assessment? Who may need to be involved in the assessment? Who will coordinate if multiple teams are required to investigate and assess the situation? Who needs to review the results of the assessment, and how will the results of the assessment be communicated (e.g. phone bridge, written memo)? What happens if your primary mode of communication is unavailable (e.g. phone service is down)?

    Declaration

    Who is responsible today for declaring a disaster and activating business continuity plans? What are the organization’s criteria for activating continuity plans, and how will BCP activation be communicated? Establish a crisis management team to guide the organization through a wide range of crises by Implementing Crisis Management Best Practices.

    3.1.3 Document the business recovery workflow

    1 hour

    Input

    • Pilot BIA.
    • Any existing crisis management, incident response, or emergency response plans.
    • BC Scenario

    Output

    • Outline of your BCP declaration and business recovery plan.

    Materials

    • Cue cards, sticky notes, whiteboard and markers, or Visio template.

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator (facilitates the exercise)
    • Business Process Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager

    Do the following:

    1. Create separate flows for facility, IT, and staff disruptions. Include additional workflows as needed.
      • We suggest you outline the recovery process at least to the point where business processes are restored to a minimum viable functional level.
    2. On white cue cards:
      1. Record the step.
      2. Indicate the task owner.
      3. Estimate how long the step will take.
    3. On yellow cue cards, document gaps in people, process, and technology requirements to complete the step.
    4. On red cue cards, indicate risks (e.g. no backup person for a key staff member).

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Tabletop planning is most effective when you keep it simple.

    • Be focused; stay on task and on time.
    • Revisit each step and record risks and mitigation strategies.
    • Discuss each step from start to finish.
    • Revise the plan with key task owners.
    • Don’t get weighed down by tools.
    • Simple tools, like cue cards or whiteboards, can be very effective.

    Tool: BCP Recovery Workflow

    Document the steps you identified in the tabletop to create your draft recovery workflow.

    Why use a flowchart?

    • Flowcharts provide an at-a-glance view, are ideal for crisis scenarios where pressure is high and effective, and where timely communication is necessary.
    • For experienced managers and staff, a high-level reminder of process flows or key steps is sufficient.
    • Where more detail is required, include links to supporting documentation (which could include checklists, vendor documentation/contracts, other flowcharts, etc.)

    Create one recovery workflow for all scenarios.

    Traditional planning calls for separate plans for different “what-if” scenarios. This is challenging not just because it’s a lot more documentation – and maintenance – but because it’s impossible to predict every possible incident. Use the template, aligned to recovery of process dependencies, to create one recovery workflow for each business unit that can be used in and tested against different scenarios.

    Download Info-Tech’s BCP Recovery Workflow Example

    "We use flowcharts for our declaration procedures. Flowcharts are more effective when you have to explain status and next steps to upper management." – Assistant Director-IT Operations, Healthcare Industry

    "Very few business interruptions are actually major disasters. It’s usually a power outage or hardware failure, so I ensure my plans address ‘minor’ incidents as well as major disasters."- BCP Consultant

    3.1.4 Document achievable recovery metrics (RTA/RPA)

    30 minutes

    Input

    • Pilot BCP BIA.
    • Draft recovery workflow.

    Output

    • RTA and RPA for each business process.

    Materials

    • Pilot BCP BIA.

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator (facilitates the exercise)
    • Business Process Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager

    Add the following data to your copy of the BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool.

    1. Estimate the recovery time achievable (RTA) for each process based on the required time for the process to be restored to a minimum acceptable functional level. Review your recovery workflow to identify this timeline. For example, if the full process from notification, assessment, and declaration to recovery and relocation would take a full day, set the RTA to 24 hours.
    2. Estimate the recovery point achievable (RPA) for each process based on the maximum amount of data that could be lost. For example, if data on a particular system is backed up offsite once per day, and the onsite system was destroyed just before that backup began, the entire day’s data could be lost and the achievable RPO is 24 hours. Note: Enter a value of 9999 to indicate that data is unrecoverable.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Operating at a minimum acceptable functional level may not be feasible for more than a few days or weeks. Develop plans for immediate continuity first, then develop further plans for long-term continuity processes as required. Recognize that for longer term outages, you will evolve your plans in the crisis to meet the needs of the situation.

    3.1.5 Test the workflow of other scenarios

    1 hour

    Input

    • Draft recovery workflow.

    Output

    • Updated draft recovery workflow.

    Materials

    • Draft recovery workflow.
    • Projector or screen.

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator (facilitates the exercise)
    • Business Process Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager

    Work from and update the soft copy of your recovery workflow.

    1. Would any steps change if the scenario changes? If yes, capture the different flow with a decision diamond. See the example Recovery Workflow for a workflow that uses decision diamonds. Identify any new gaps or risks you encounter with red and yellow cards.
    2. Make sure the decision diamonds are as generalized as possible. For example, instead of creating a separate response plan for each scenario that would require you to relocate from your existing building, create one response plan for relocation and one response plan for remaining in place.
    3. See the next section for some examples of different types of scenarios that you may include in your recovery workflow.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Remember that health and safety risks must be dealt with first in a crisis. The business unit recovery workflow will focus on restoring business operations after employees are no longer at risk (e.g. the risk has been resolved or employees have been safely relocated). See Implement Crisis Management Best Practices for ideas on how to respond to and assess a wide range of crises.

    Not all scenarios will have full continuity plans

    Risk management is a business decision. Business continuity planning can help decision makers understand and decide on whether to accept or mitigate high impact, low probability risks.

    For some organizations, it’s not practical or possible to invest in the redundancy that would be necessary to recover in a timely manner from certain major events.

    Leverage existing risk management practices to identify key high impact events that could present major business continuity challenges that could cause catastrophic disruptions to facility, IT, staffing, suppliers, or equipment. If you don’t have a risk register, review the scenarios on the next slide and brainstorm risks with the working group.

    Work through tabletop planning to identify how you might work through an event like this, at a high level. In step 3.2, you can estimate the effort, cost, and benefit for different ideas that can help mitigate the damage to the business to help decision makers choose between investment in mitigation or accepting the risk.

    Document any scenarios that you identify as outside the scope of your continuity plans in the “Scope” section of your BCP Summary document.

    For example:

    A single location manufacturing company is creating a BCP.

    The factory is large and contains expensive equipment; it’s not possible to build a second factory for redundancy. If the factory is destroyed, operations can’t be resumed until the factory is rebuilt. In this case, the BCP outlines how to conduct an orderly business shutdown while the factory is rebuilt.

    Contingency planning to resume factory operations after less destructive events, as well as a BCP for corporate services, is still practical and necessary.

    Considerations for other BCP scenarios

    Scenario Type Considerations
    Local hazard (gas leak, chemical leak, criminal incident, etc.)
    • Systems might be accessible remotely, but hands-on maintenance will be required eventually. “Work from home” won’t be a long-term solution.
    • An alternate site is required for service continuity. Can be within normal commuting distance.
    Equipment/building damage (fire, roof collapse, etc.)
    • Equipment will need repair or replacement (vendor involvement).
    • An alternate site is required for service continuity. Can be nearby.
    Regional natural disasters
    • Utilities may be affected (power, running water, etc.).
    • Expect staff to take care of their families first before work.
    • A geographically distant alternate site is required for service continuity.
    Supplier failure (IT provider outage, disaster at supplier, etc.)
    • Service-level agreements are important to establish recovery timelines. Review contracts and master services agreements.
    Staff (lottery win, work stoppage, pandemic/quarantine)
    • Staff are suddenly unavailable. Expect that no warm handoff to alternates is possible and that time to ramp up on the process is accounted for.
    • In a pandemic scenario, work from home, remote toolsets, and digital/contactless workflows become critical.

    Step 3.2

    Identify and prioritize projects to close gaps

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Brainstorm solutions to identified gaps and risks.
    • Prioritize projects and action items to close gaps and risks.
    • Assess the impact of proposed projects on the recovery workflow.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • BCP Coordinator
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    • Expert Business Unit Staff

    In this step, you’ll use these tools and templates:

    Outcomes & Insights

    Identify and prioritize projects and action items that can improve business continuity capabilities.

    3.2.1 Brainstorm solutions to address risks and gaps

    1 hour

    Input

    • Draft recovery workflow.
    • Known continuity risks and gaps.

    Output

    • Ideas for action items and projects to improve business continuity.

    Materials

    • Flipchart

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator (facilitates the exercise)
    • Business Process Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    1. Review each of the risk and gap cards from the tabletop exercise.
    2. As a group, brainstorm ideas to address gaps, mitigate risks, and improve resiliency. Write the list of ideas on a whiteboard or flip chart paper. The solutions can range from quick-wins and action items to major capital investments. The following slides can help you seed ideas to support brainstorming and idea generation.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Try to avoid debates about feasibility at this point. The goal is to get ideas on the board.

    When you’re brainstorming solutions to problems, don’t stop with the first idea, even if the solution seems obvious. The first idea isn’t always the best or only solution – other ideas can expand on it and improve it.

    Step 4: No formal process to declare a disaster and invoke business continuity.

    Step 7: Alternate site could be affected by the same regional event as the main office.

    Step 12: Need to confirm supplier service-level agreements (SLAs).

    1. Continue to create BCP documentation.
    2. Identify a third location for regional disasters.
    3. Contact suppliers to confirm SLAs and validate alignment with RTOs/RPOs.
    4. Add BCP requirements collection to service procurement process?

    Discuss your remote work capabilities

    With COVID-19, most organizations have experience with mass work-from-home.

    Review the following case studies. Do they reflect your experience during the COVID-19 pandemic?

    Unacceptable risk

    • A small insurance company provided laptops to staff so they could work remotely.
    • Complication: Cheque and print stock is a dependency and no plan was made to store check stock offsite in a secure fashion.

    Key dependencies missing

    • A local government provided laptops to key staff so they could work remotely.
    • Complication: The organization didn’t currently own enough Citrix licenses for every user to be online concurrently.

    Unable to serve customers

    • The attestation and land services department of a local government agency provided staff with remote access to key apps.
    • Complication: Their most critical business processes were designed to be in-person – they had no plan to execute these processes from home.

    Consider where your own work-from-home plans fell short.

    • Were your collaboration and communication solutions too difficult for users to use effectively?
    • Did legacy infrastructure affect performance or limit capabilities? Were security concerns appropriately addressed?
    • What challenges did IT face supporting business users on break-fix and new requests?
    • Were there logistical needs (shipping/receiving, etc.) that weren’t met?
    • Develop an updated plan to support work-from-home using Info-Tech’s BCP Relocation Checklists and Home Office Survey template, and integrate these into your overall BCP documentation. Stakeholders can easily appreciate the value of this plan since it’s relevant to recent experience.

    Identify opportunities to improve continuity plans

    What gaps in your continuity response could be addressed with better planning?

    People

    • Alternates are not identified
    • Roles in a disaster are not formalized
    • No internal/external crisis comm. strategy

    Site & Facilities

    • No alternate place of business or command center identified
    • No formal planning or exercises to test alternate site viability

    • Identify a viable secondary site and/or work-from-home plan, and develop a schedule for testing activities. Review in Step 3.3 of the Develop a Business Continuity Plan blueprint.

    External Services & Suppliers

    • Contingency plans for a disruption not planned or formalized
    • No formal review of service-level agreements (SLAs)

    • Contact key suppliers and vendors to establish SLAs, and ensure they meet requirements.
    • Review supplier continuity plans.

    Technology & Physical Assets

    • No secondary site or redundancy for critical IT systems
    • No documented end-to-end IT DR plan

    Tool: BCP Project Roadmap

    Prioritize and visualize BCP projects to present options to decision makers.

    Not all BCP projects can be tackled at once. Enable decision makers to defer, rather than outright reject, projects that aren’t feasible at this time.

    1. Configure the tool in Tab 1. Setup. Adjust criteria and definitions for criteria. Note that shaded columns are required for reporting purposes and can’t be modified.
    2. Add projects and action items in Tab 2. Data Entry. Fields highlighted in red are all required for the dashboard to populate. All other fields are optional but will provide opportunities to track more detailed data on project ideas.
    3. To generate the dashboard in Tab 3. Roadmap, open the Data ribbon and under Queries and Connections click Refresh All. You can now use the slicers on the right of the sheet.

    Download Info-Tech’s BCP Project Roadmap Tool

    Demonstrate BCP project impacts

    Illustrate the benefits of proposed projects.

    1. Review your recovery workflow.
    2. Make updates to a second copy of the high-level outline to illustrate how the business response to a disaster scenario will change once proposed projects are complete.
    • Remove steps that have been made unnecessary.
    • Remove any risks or gaps that have been mitigated or addressed.
    • Verify that proposed projects close gaps between acceptable and achievable recovery capabilities in the BIA tool.
  • The visual impact of a shorter, less-risky recovery workflow can help communicate the benefits of proposed projects to decision makers.
  • Step 3.3

    Evaluate business continuity site and command center options

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Take a deep dive on the requirements for working from an alternate location.
    • Assess different options for an alternate location.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • BCP Coordinator
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    • Expert Business Unit Staff

    In this step, you’ll use these tools and templates:

    Outcomes & Insights

    Identify requirements for an alternate business site.

    Tool: Relocation Checklists

    An alternate site could be another company building, a dedicated emergency operations center, or work-from-home. Use this tool to guide and prepare for any relocation exercise.

    • Coordinate your response with the pre-populated checklists in Tabs 1 & 2, identify who’s responsible for items on the checklists, and update your recovery workflows to reflect new steps. When reviewing the checklist, consider what can be done to prepare ahead of a crisis.
      • For example, you may wish to create crisis communication templates to streamline crisis communications during a disaster.
    • Calculate the effort required to provision equipment for relocated users in Tabs 3 & 4.
    • Evaluate your options for alternate sites with the requirements matrix in Tab 5. Use your evaluation to identify how the organization could address shortcomings of viable options either ahead of time or at the time of an incident.

    Download Info-Tech’s BCP Relocation Checklists

    Create a checklist of requirements for an alternate site

    Leverage the roll-up view, in tab 3, of dependencies required to create a list of requirements for an alternate site in tab 4.

    1. The table on Tab 5 of the relocation checklists is pre-populated with some common requirements. Modify or replace requirements to suit your needs for an alternate business/office site. Be sure to consider distance, transportation, needed services, accessibility, IT infrastructure, security, and seating capacity at a minimum.
    2. Don’t assume. Verify. Confirm anything that requires permissions from the site owner. What network providers have a presence in the building? Can you access the site 24/7 and conduct training exercises? What facilities and services are available? Are you guaranteed the space if needed?

    "There are horror stories about organizations that assumed things about their alternate site that they later found out they weren’t true in practice." – Dr. Bernard Jones, MBCI CBCP

    Info-Tech Insight

    If you choose a shared location as a BCP site, a regional disaster may put you in competition with other tenants for space.

    Identify a command center

    For command center and alternate worksite selection, remember that most incidents are local and short term. Identify an onsite and an offsite command center.

    1. For events where the building is not compromised, identify an onsite location, ideally with remote conferencing capabilities and planning and collaboration tools (projectors, whiteboards, flipcharts). The onsite location can also be used for BCM and crisis management meetings. Remember, most business continuity events are not regional or massively destructive.
    2. For the offsite command center, select a location that is sufficiently far away from your normal business location to maintain separation from local incidents while minimizing commute time. However, consider a geographically distant option (e.g. more than 50 miles away) identified for those scenarios where it is a regional disaster, or plan to leverage online tools to create a virtual command center (see the Insight box below).
    3. The first members of the Emergency Response Team to be notified of the incident will determine which location to use or whether a third alternative is required.

    Info-Tech Insight

    For many organizations, a dedicated command center (TVs on the wall, maps and charts in filing cabinets) isn’t necessary. A conference bridge and collaboration tools allowing everyone to work remotely can be an acceptable offsite command center as long as digital options can meet your command center requirements.

    Create a plan for a return to normal

    Operating in continuity mode for an extended period of time tends to result in higher costs and reduced business capabilities. It’s important to restore normal operations as soon as possible.

    Advance planning can minimize risks and delays in returning to normal operations.

    Leverage the methodology and tools in this blueprint to define your return to normal (repatriation) procedures:

    1. Repeat the tabletop planning exercise to determine the repatriation steps and potential gaps. How will you return to the primary site from your alternate site? Does data need to be re-entered into core systems if IT services are down? Do you need to transfer job duties back to primary staff?
    2. What needs to be done to address the gaps in the return to normal workflow? Are there projects or action items that could make return to normal easier?

    For more on supporting a business move back to the office from the IT perspective, see Responsibly Resume IT Operations in the Office

    Potential business impacts of ongoing operations at a failover site

    • The cost of leasing alternate business worksites.
    • Inability to deliver on strategic initiatives while in emergency/interim operations mode, resulting in lost business opportunities.
    • A growing backlog of work that falls outside of emergency operations mode.
    • Travel and accommodation costs if the alternate site is geographically remote.
    • Additional vendor licensing and contract costs.

    Phase 4

    Extend the Results of the Pilot BCP and Implement Governance

    Phase 4

    4.1 Consolidate BCP pilot insights to support an overall BCP project plan

    4.2 Outline a business continuity management (BCM) program

    4.3 Test and maintain your BCP

    Insights & Outcomes

    Summarize and consolidate your initial insights and documentation. Create a project plan for overall BCP. Identify teams, responsibilities, and accountabilities, and assign documentation ownership. Integrate BCP findings in DR and crisis management practices. Set guidelines for testing, plan maintenance, training, and awareness.

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    • BCP Executive Sponsor

    Step 4.1

    Consolidate BCP pilot insights to support an overall BCP project plan

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Summarize and consolidate outputs and key insights from the BCP pilot.
    • Identify outputs from the pilot that can be re-used for the overall BCP.
    • Create a project charter for an overall BCP.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • BCP Coordinator
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    • BCP Executive Sponsor

    In this step, you’ll use these tools and templates:

    Outcomes & Insights

    Present results from the pilot BCP, and outline how you’ll use the pilot process with other business units to create an overall continuity program.

    Structure the overall BCP program.

    Template: BCP Pilot Results Presentation

    Highlight key findings from the BCP pilot to make the case for next steps.

    • Highlight critical gaps or risks identified, any potential process improvements, and progress made toward improving overall BCP maturity through the pilot project. Summarize the benefits of the pilot project for an executive audience.
    • Review process recovery objectives (RTO/RPO). Provide an overview of recovery capabilities (RTA/RPA). Highlight any significant gaps between objectives and capabilities.
    • Propose next steps, including an overall BCP project and program, and projects and action items to remediate gaps and risks.
    • Develop a project plan to estimate resource requirements for an overall BCP project prior to delivering this presentation. Quantifying required time and resources is a key outcome as it enables the remaining business units to properly scope and resource their BCP development activities and can help managers overcome the fear of the unknown.

    Download Info-Tech’s BCP Pilot Results Presentation

    Tool: BCP Summary

    Sum up information from completed BCP documents to create a high-level BCP overview for auditors and executives.

    The BCP Summary document is the capstone to business unit continuity planning exercises. It consolidates your findings in a short overview of your business continuity requirements, capabilities, and maintenance procedures.

    Info-Tech recommends embedding hyperlinks within the Summary to the rest of your BCP documentation to allow the reader to drill down further as needed. Leverage the following documents:

    • Business Impact Analysis
    • BCP Recovery Workflows
    • Business Process Workflows
    • BCP Project Roadmap
    • BCP Relocation Checklists
    • Business Continuity Policy

    Download Info-Tech’s BCP Summary Document

    Reuse templates for additional exercises

    The same methodology described in this blueprint can be repeated for each business unit. Also, many of the artifacts from the BCP pilot can be reused or built upon to give the remaining business units a head start. For example:

    • BCP Pilot Project Charter Template. Make a copy to use as a base for the next business unit’s BCP project charter, and update the stakeholders/roles and milestone dates. The rest of the content can remain the same in most cases.
    • BCP Reference Workbook. This tool contains information common to all business units and can be updated as needed.
    • BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool. You may need to start a separate copy for each business unit to allow enough space to capture all business processes. However, use the same scoring scale to drive consistent assessments. In addition, the scoring completed by the pilot business unit provides an example and benchmark for assessing other business processes.
    • BCP Recovery Workflow. The notification, assessment, and declaration steps can be standardized so remaining business units can focus primarily on recovery after a disaster is declared. Similarly, many of the steps related to alternate sites and IT workarounds will also apply to other business units.
    • BCP Project Roadmap Tool. Many of the projects identified by the pilot business unit will also apply to other business units – update the list as needed.
    • The Business Unit BCP Prioritization Tool, BCP Executive Presentation, and Business Continuity Policy Template do not need to be updated for each business unit.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    You may need to create some artifacts that are site specific. For example, relocation plans or emergency plans may not be reusable from one site to another. Use your judgement to reuse as much of the templates as you can – similar templates simplify audit, oversight, and plan management.

    Create an Overall BCP Project Charter

    Modify the pilot project charter to encompass the larger BCP project.

    Adjust the pilot charter to answer the following questions:

    • How much time and effort should the rest of the project take, based on findings from the pilot? When do you expect to meet certain milestones? What outputs and outcomes are expected?
    • In what order should additional business units complete their BCP? Who needs to be involved?
    • What projects to address continuity gaps were identified during the pilot? What investments will likely be required?
    • What additional documentation is required? This section and the appendix include templates to document your BCM Policy, Teams & Contacts, your notification procedures, and more.
    • How does this integrate with the other areas of business resilience and continuity (IT disaster recovery planning and crisis management planning)?
    • What additional activities, such as testing, are required?

    Prioritize business units for further BCP activities.

    As with the pilot, choose a business unit, or business units, where BCP will have the greatest impact and where further BCP activities will have the greatest likelihood of success. Prioritize business units that are critical to many areas of the business to get key results sooner.

    Work with one business unit at a time if:

    • Required resources from the business unit are available to focus on BCP full-time over a short period (one to two weeks).
    • More hands-on guidance (less delegation) is needed.
    • The business unit is large or has complex processes.

    Work with several business units at the same time if:

    • Required resources are only available sporadically over a longer period of time.
    • Less guidance (more delegation) is possible.
    • All business units are small and have well-documented processes.

    Download Info-Tech’s Business Unit BCP Prioritization Tool

    Step 4.2

    Outline a Business Continuity Management (BCM) Program

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify teams and roles for BCP and business continuity management.
    • Identify individuals to fill key roles.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • BCP Coordinator
    • Executive Sponsor

    In this step, you’ll use these tools and templates:

    Outcomes & Insights

    Document BCP teams, roles, and responsibilities.

    Document contact information, alternates, and succession rules.

    Outline a Business Continuity Management Program

    A BCM program, also known as a BCM system, helps structure business continuity activities and practices to deliver long-term benefits to your business.

    A BCM program should:

    • Establish who is responsible and accountable for BCP practices, activities, and documentation, and set documentation management practices.
    • Define a process to improve plans. Review and update continuity requirements, suggest enhancements to recovery capabilities, and measure progress and improvements to the plan over time.
    • Coordinate disaster recovery, business continuity, and crisis management planning outputs and practices.
    • Communicate the value of the continuity program to the organization.

    Develop a Business Continuity Management Program

    Phase 4 of this blueprint will focus on the following elements of a business continuity management program:

    • BCM Roles, Responsibilities, and Accountabilities
    • BCM Document Management Practices
    • Integrate BC, IT DR, Crisis Management, and Emergency Management
    • Business Continuity Plan maintenance and testing
    • Training and awareness

    Schedule a call with an Info-Tech Analyst for help building out these core elements, and for advice on developing the rest of your BCM program.

    Create BCM teams

    Include a mix of strong leaders and strong planners on your BC management teams.

    BC management teams (including the secondary teams such as the emergency response team) have two primary roles:

    1. Preparation, Planning, and Governance: Conduct and consolidate business impact analyses. Review, and support the development of recovery workflows, including emergency response plans and business unit recovery workflows. Organize testing and training. Report on the state of the continuity plan.
    2. Leadership During a Crisis: Coordinate and support the execution of business recovery processes. To meet these goals, each team needs a mix of skill sets.

    Crisis leaders require strong crisis management skills:

    • Ability to make quick decisions under pressure with incomplete information.
    • Excellent verbal communication skills.
    • Strong leadership skills. Calm in stressful situations.
    • Team leaders are ideally, but not necessarily, those with the most senior title on each team. It’s more important that the team leader has the appropriate skill set.

    Collectively, the team must include a broad range of expertise as well as strong planning skills:

    • Diverse expertise to be able to plan for and respond to a wide range of potential incidents, from health and safety to reputational damage.
    • Excellent organizational skills and attention to detail.
    • Excellent written communication skills.

    Note: For specific BC team roles and responsibilities, including key resources such as Legal, HR, and IT SMEs required to prepare for and execute crisis management plans, see Implement Crisis Management Best Practices.

    Structure the BCM Team

    Create a hierarchy of teams to govern and coordinate business continuity planning and crisis management.

    BCM Team: Govern business continuity, DR, and crisis management planning. Support the organization’s response to a crisis, including the decision to declare a disaster or emergency.

    Emergency Response Teams: Assist staff and BC teams during a crisis, with a focus first on health and safety. There’s usually one team per location. Develop and maintain emergency response plans.

    Emergency Response Teams: Assist staff and BC teams during a crisis, with a focus first on health and safety. There’s usually one team per location. Develop and maintain emergency response plans.

    IT Disaster Recovery Team: Manage the recovery of IT services and data following an incident. Develop and maintain the IT DRP.

    Business Unit BCP Teams: Coordinate business process recovery at the business unit level. Develop and maintain business unit BCPs.

    “Planning Mode”

    Executive Team → BC Management Team ↓

    • Emergency Response Teams (ERT)
    • Crisis Management Team
    • IT DR Management Team
    • Business Unit BCP Teams

    “Crisis Mode”

    Executive Team ↔Crisis Management Team↓ ↔ Emergency Response Teams (ERT)

    • BC Management Team
    • IT DR Management Team
    • Business Unit BCP Teams

    For more details on specific roles to include on these teams, as well as more information on crisis management, review Info-Tech’s blueprint, Implement Crisis Management Best Practices.

    Tool: BCM Teams, Roles, Contacts, and Vendors

    Track teams, roles, and contacts in this template. It is pre-populated with roles and responsibilities for business continuity, crisis management, IT disaster recovery, emergency response, and vendors and suppliers critical to business operations.

    • Expect overlap across teams. For example, the BC Management Team will include representation from each secondary team to ensure plans are in sync. Similarly, both the Crisis Communication Team and BC Management Team should include a representative from your legal team to ensure legal issues are considered in communications as well as overall crisis management.
    • Clarify spending and decision authority for key members of each team during a crisis.

    Track contact information in this template only if you don’t have a more streamlined way of tracking it elsewhere.

    Download Info-Tech’s Business Continuity Teams and Roles Tool

    Manage key vendors

    Review supplier capabilities and contracts to ensure they meet your requirements.

    Suppliers and vendors might include:

    • Material shipments
    • IT/telecoms service providers
    • Integrators and business process outsourcing providers
    • Independent contractors
    • Utilities (power, water, etc.)

    Supplier RTOs and RPOs should align with the acceptable RTOs and RPOs defined in the BIA. Where they do not, explore options for improvement.

    Confirm the following:

    1. The supplier’s own BC/DR capabilities – how they would recover their own operations in a disaster scenario.
    2. Any continuity services the supplier provides – how they can help you recover your operations in a disaster scenario.
    3. Their existing contractual obligations for service availability (e.g. SLAs).

    Download Info-Tech’s BCP Supplier Evaluation Questionnaire

    Organize your BCMS documentation

    Your BCP isn’t any one document. It’s multiple documents that work together.

    Continue to work through any additional required documentation. Build a repository where master copies of each document will reside and can be updated as required. Assign ownership of document management to someone with an understanding of the process (e.g. the BCP Coordinator).

    Governance Recovery
    BCMS Policy BCP Summary Core BCP Recovery Workflows
    Business Process Workflows Action Items & Project Roadmap BCP Recovery Checklists
    BIA Teams, Roles, Contact Information BCP Business Process Workarounds and Recovery Checklists
    BCP Maturity Scorecard BCP Project Charter Additional Recovery Workflows
    Business Unit Prioritization Tool BCP Presentation

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Recovery documentation has a different audience, purpose, and lifecycle than governance documentation, and keeping the documents separate can help with content management. Disciplined document management keeps the plan current and accessible.

    Align your IT DRP with your BCP

    Use the following BCP outputs to inform your DRP:

    • Business process technology dependencies. This includes technology not controlled by IT (e.g. cloud-based services).
    • RTOs and RPOs for business processes.
    • Technology projects identified by the business to improve resilience (e.g. improved mobility support).
    PCP Outputs DRP Activities
    Business processes defined Identify critical applications

    Dependencies identified:

    • People
    • Enterprise tech
    • Personal devices
    • Workspace and facilities
    • Services and other inputs

    Identify IT dependencies:

    • Infrastructure
    • Secondary applications

    Recovery objectives defined:

    • BIA and RTOs/RPOs
    • Recovery workflows

    Identify recovery objectives:

    • BIA and RTOs/RPOs
    • IT Recovery workflows

    Projects identified to close gaps:

    • Resourcing changes (e.g. training secondary staff)
    • Process changes (e.g. optimize processes and define interim processes)
    • Technology changes (e.g. improving mobility)

    Identify projects to close gaps:

    • Projects to improve DR capability (e.g. data replication, standby systems).
    • Projects to improve resiliency (e.g. redundant components)

    Info-Tech Insight

    Don’t think of inconsistencies between your DRP and BCP as a problem. Discrepancies between the plans are part of the discovery process, and they’re an opportunity to have a conversation that can improve alignment between IT service capabilities and business needs. You should expect that there will be discrepancies – managing discrepancies is part of the ongoing process to refine and improve both plans.

    Schedule activities to keep BC and DR in sync

    BC/DR Planning Workflow

    1. Collect BCP outputs that impact IT DRP (e.g. technology RTOs/RPOs).

    2. As BCPs are done, BCP Coordinator reviews outputs with IT DRP Management Team.

    3. Use the RTOs/RPOs from the BCPs as a starting point to determine IT recovery plans.

    4. Identify investments required to meet business-defined RTOs/RPOs, and validate with the business.

    5. Create a DR technology roadmap to meet validated RTOs/RPOs.

    6. Review and update business unit BCPs to reflect updated RTOs/RPOs.

    Find and address shadow IT

    Reviewing business processes and dependencies can identify workarounds or shadow IT solutions that weren’t visible to IT and haven’t been included in IT’s DR plan.

    • If you identify technology process dependencies that IT didn’t know about, it can be an opportunity to start a conversation about service support. This can be a “teachable moment” to highlight the risks of adopting and implementing technology solutions without consulting IT.
    • Highlight the possible impact of using technology services that aren’t supported by IT. For example:
      • RTOs and RPOs may not be in line with business requirements.
      • Costs could be higher than supported solutions.
      • Security controls may not be in line with compliance requirements.
      • IT may not be able to offer support when the service breaks or build new features or functionality that might be required in the future.
    • Make sure that if IT is expected to support shadow IT solutions, these systems are included in the IT DRP and that the risks and costs of supporting the non-core solution are clear to all parties and are compared to an alternative, IT-recommended solutions.

    Shadow IT can be a symptom of larger service support issues. There should be a process for requesting and tracking non-standard services from IT with appropriate technical, security, and management oversight.

    Review and reprioritize BC projects to create an overall BC project roadmap

    Assign the BCP Coordinator the task of creating a master list of BC projects, and then work with the BC management team to review and reprioritize this list, as described below:

    1. Build a list of BC projects as you work with each business unit.
      1. Add proposed projects to a master copy of the BCP Project Roadmap Tool
      2. For each subsequent business unit, copy project names, scoring, and timelines into the master roadmap tool.
    2. Work with the Executive Sponsor, the IT BCM representative, and the BCM team to review and reprioritize projects.
      1. In the master BCP Project Roadmap Tool, review and update project scoring, taking into account the relative importance of each project within the overall list. Rationalize the list (e.g. eliminate duplicate projects).
    3. The project roadmap is a suggested list of projects at this stage. Assign a project sponsor and project manager (from the BC management team or appropriate delegates) to each project to take it through your organization’s normal project scoping and approval process.

    Improving business continuity capabilities is a marathon, not a sprint. Change for the better is still change and introduces risk – massive changes introduce massive risk. Incremental changes help minimize disruption. Use Info-Tech research to deliver organizational change.

    "Developing a BCP can be like solving a Rubik’s Cube. It’s a complex, interdepartmental concern with multiple and sometimes conflicting objectives. When you have one side in place, another gets pushed out of alignment." – Ray Mach, BCP Expert

    Step 4.3

    Test and maintain your BCP

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Create additional documentation to support your business continuity plan.
    • Create a repository for documentation, and assign ownership for BCP documentation.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • BCP Coordinator

    In this step, you’ll use these tools and templates:

    Outcomes & Insights

    Create a plan to maintain the BCP.

    Iterate on your plan

    Tend your garden, and pull the weeds.

    Mastery comes through practice and iteration. Iterating on and testing your plan will help you keep up to date with business changes, identify plan improvements, and help your organization’s employees develop a mindset of continuity readiness. Maintenance drives continued success; don’t let your plan become stagnant, messy, and unusable.

    Your BCM program should structure BCP reviews and updates by answering the following:

    1. When do we review the plan?
    2. What are the goals of a review?
    3. Who must lead reviews and update BCP documents?
    4. How do we track reviews, tests, and updates?

    Structure plan reviews

    There are more opportunities for improvements than just planned reviews.

    At a minimum, review goals should include:

    1. Identify and document changes to BCP requirements.
    2. Identify and document changes to BCP capabilities.
    3. Identify gaps and risks and ways to remediate risks and close gaps.

    Who leads reviews and updates documents?

    The BCP Coordinator is likely heavily involved in facilitating reviews and updating documentation, at least at first. Look for opportunities to hand off document ownership to the business units over time.

    How do we track reviews, tests, and updates?

    Keep track of your good work by keeping a log of document changes. If you don’t have one, you can use the last tab on the BCP-DRP Maintenance Checklist.

    When do we review the plan?

    1. Scheduled reviews: At a minimum, plan reviews once a year. Plan owners should review the documents, identify needed updates, and notify the coordinator of any changes to their plan.
    2. As-needed reviews: Project launches, major IT upgrades, office openings or moves, organizational restructuring – all of these should trigger a BCP review.
    3. Testing exercises: Schedule controlled exercises to test and improve different aspects of your continuity plan, and ensure that lessons learned become part of plan documentation.
    4. Retrospectives: Take the opportunity to learn from actual continuity events and crises by conducting retrospectives to evaluate your response and brainstorm improvements.

    Conduct a retrospective after major incidents

    Use a retrospective on your COVID-19 response as a starting point. Build on the questions below to guide the conversation.

    • If needed, how did we set up remote work for our users? What worked, and what didn’t?
    • Did we discover any long-term opportunities to improve business processes?
    • Did we use any continuity plans we have documented?
    • Did we effectively prioritize business processes for recovery?
    • Were expectations from our business users in line with our plans?
    • What parts of our plan worked, and where can we improve the plan?
    1. Gather stakeholders and team members
    2. Ask:
      1. What happened?
      2. What did we learn?
      3. What did we do well?
      4. What should we have done differently?
      5. What gaps should we take action to address?
    3. Prepare a plan to take action

    Outcomes and benefits

    • Confirm business priorities.
    • Validate that business recovery solutions and procedures are effective in meeting business requirements (i.e. RTOs and RPOs).
    • Identify gaps in continuity resources, procedures, or documentation, and options to close gaps.
    • Build confidence in the response team and recovery capabilities.

    Tool: Testing and Maintenance Schedule

    Build a light-weight maintenance schedule for your BCP and DRP plans.

    This tool helps you set a schedule for plan update activities, identify document and exercise owners, and log updates for audit and governance purposes.

    • Add the names of your documents and brainstorm update activities.
    • Activities (document updates, testing, etc.) might be scheduled regularly, as-needed, or both. If they happen “as needed,” identify the trigger for the activity.
    • Start tracking past activities and resulting changes in Tab 3. You can also track crises that tested your continuity capabilities on this tab.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Everyone gets busy. If there’s a meeting you can schedule months in advance, schedule it months in advance! Then send reminders closer to the date. As soon as you’re done the pilot BCP, set aside time in everyone’s calendar for your first review session, whether that’s three months, six months, or a year from now.

    Appendix

    Additional BCP Tools and Templates

    Template Library: Business Continuity Policy

    Create a high-level policy to govern BCP and clarify BCP requirements.

    Use this template to:

    • Outline the organizational commitment to BCM.
    • Clarify the mandate to prepare, validate, and maintain continuity plans that align with business requirements.
    • Define specific policy statements that signatories to the policy are expected to uphold.
    • Require key stakeholders to review and sign off on the template.

    Download Info-Tech’s Business Continuity Policy template

    Template Library: Workarounds & Recovery Checklists

    Capture the step-by-step details to execute workarounds and steps in the business recovery process.

    If you require more detail to support your recovery procedures, you can use this template to:

    • Record specific steps or checklists to support specific workarounds or recovery procedures.
    • Identify prerequisites for workarounds or recovery procedures.

    Download Info-Tech’s BCP Process Workarounds & Recovery Checklists Template

    Template Library: Notification, Assessment, Declaration

    Create a procedure that outlines the conditions for assessing a disaster situation and invoking the business continuity plan.

    Use this template to:

    • Guide the process whereby the business is notified of an incident, assesses the situation, and declares a disaster.
    • Set criteria for activating business continuity plans.
    • Review examples of possible events, and suggest options on how the business might proceed or react.

    Download Info-Tech’s BCP Notification, Assessment, and Disaster Declaration Plan template

    Template Library: BCP Recovery Workflow Example

    Review an example of BCP recovery workflows.

    Use this template to:

    • Generate ideas for your own recovery processes.
    • See real examples of recovery processes for warehousing, supply, and distribution operations.
    • Review an example of working BCP documentation.

    Download Info-Tech’s BCP Recovery Workflows Example

    Create a Pandemic Response Plan

    If you’ve been asked to build a pandemic-specific response plan, use your core BCP findings to complete these pandemic planning documents.

    • At the onset of the COVID-19 crisis, IT departments were asked to rapidly ramp up work-from-home capabilities and support other process workarounds.
    • IT managers already knew that obstacles to working from home would go beyond internet speed and needing a laptop. Business input is critical to uncover unexpected obstacles.
    • IT needed to address a range of issues from security risk to increased service desk demand from users who don’t normally work from home.
    • Workarounds to speed the process up had to be balanced with good IT practices and governance (Asset Management, Security, etc.)
    • If you’ve been asked to update your Pandemic Response Plan, use this template and your core BCP deliverables to deliver a set of streamlined documentation that draws on lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Structure HR’s role in the pandemic plan

    Leverage the following materials from Info-Tech’s HR-focused sister company, McLean & Company.

    These HR research resources live on the website of Info-Tech’s sister company, McLean & Company. Contact your Account Manager to gain access to these resources.

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Knowledge Gained

    This blueprint outlined:

    • The streamlined approach to BCP development.
    • A BIA process to identify acceptable, appropriate recovery objectives.
    • Tabletop planning exercises to document and validate business recovery procedures.

    Processes Optimized

    • Business continuity development processes were optimized, from business impact analysis to incident response planning.
    • In addition, pilot business unit processes were identified and clarified to support BCP development, which also provided the opportunity to review and optimize those processes.

    Key Deliverables Completed

    • Core BCP deliverables for the pilot business unit, including a business impact analysis, recovery workflows, and a project roadmap.
    • BCP Executive Presentation to communicate pilot results as well as a summary of the methodology to the executive team.
    • BCP Summary to provide a high-level view of BCP scope, objectives, capabilities, and requirements.

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

    Contact your account representative for more information.

    workshops@infotech.com

    1-888-670-8889

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Dr. Bernard A. Jones, MBCI, CBCP

    Professor and Continuity Consultant Berkeley College

    Dr. Jones is a professor at Berkeley College within the School of Professional Studies teaching courses in Homeland Security and Emergency Management. He is a member of the National Board of Directors for the Association of Continuity Professionals (ACP) as well as the Information & Publications Committee Chair for the Garden State Chapter of the ACP. Dr. Jones earned a doctorate degree in Civil Security Leadership, Management & Policy from New Jersey City University where his research focus was on organizational resilience.

    Kris L. Roberson

    Disaster Recovery Analyst Veterans United Home Loans

    Kris Roberson is the Disaster Recovery Analyst for Veterans United Home Loans, the #1 VA mortgage lender in the US. Kris oversees the development and maintenance of the Veterans United Home Loans DR program and leads the business continuity program. She is responsible for determining the broader strategies for DR testing and continuity planning, as well as the implementation of disaster recovery and business continuity technologies, vendors, and services. Kris holds a Masters of Strategic Leadership with a focus on organizational change management and a Bachelors in Music. She is a member of Infragard, the National Association of Professional Women, and Sigma Alpha Iota, and holds a Project+ certification.

    Trevor Butler

    General Manager of Information Technology City of Lethbridge

    As the General Manager of Information Technology with the City of Lethbridge, Trevor is accountable for providing strategic management and advancement of the city’s information technology and communications systems consistent with the goals and priorities of the corporation while ensuring that corporate risks are appropriately managed. He has 15+ years of progressive IT leadership experience, including 10+ years with public sector organizations. He holds a B.Mgt. and PMP certification along with masters certificates in both Project Management and Business Analysis.

    Robert Miller

    Information Services Director Witt/Kieffer

    Bob Miller is the Information Services Director at Witt/Kieffer. His department provides end-user support for all company-owned devices and software for Oak Brook, the regional offices, home offices, and traveling employees. The department purchases, implements, manages, and monitors the infrastructure, which includes web hosting, networks, wireless solutions, cell phones, servers, and file storage. Bob is also responsible for the firm’s security planning, capacity planning, and business continuity and disaster preparedness planning to ensure that the firm has functional technology to conduct business and continue business growth.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan

    Close the gap between your DR capabilities and service continuity requirements.

    Create Visual SOP Documents that Drive Process Optimization, Not Just Peace of Mind

    Go beyond satisfying auditors to drive process improvement, consistent IT operations, and effective knowledge transfer.

    Select the Optimal Disaster Recovery Deployment Model

    Determine which deployment models, including hybrid solutions, best meet your DR requirements.

    Bibliography

    “Business Continuity Planning.” IT Examination HandBook. The Federal Financial Institution Examination Council (FFIEC), February 2015. Web.

    “Business Continuity Plans and Emergency Contact Information.” FINRA, 12 February 2015. Web.

    “COBIT 5: A Business Framework for the Governance and Management of Enterprise IT.” ISACA, n.d. Web.

    Disaster Resource GUIDE. Emergency Lifeline Corporation, n.d. Web.

    “DR Rules & Regulations.” Disaster Recovery Journal, March 2017. Web.

    “Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA).” Homeland Security, 2014. Web.

    FEMA. “Planning & Templates.” FEMA, n.d. Web.

    “FINRA-SEC-CFTC Joint Advisory (Regulatory Notice 13-25).” FINRA, August 2013. Web.

    Gosling, Mel and Andrew Hiles. “Business Continuity Statistics: Where Myth Meets Fact.” Continuity Central, 24 April 2009. Web.

    Hanwacker, Linda. “COOP Templates for Success Workbook.” The LSH Group, 2016. Web.

    Potter, Patrick. “BCM Regulatory Alphabet Soup – Part Two.” RSA Link, 28 August 2012. Web.

    The Good Practice Guidelines. Business Continuity Institute, 2013. Web.

    Wang, Dashun and James A. Evans. “When Small Teams are Better than Big Ones.” Harvard Business Review, 21 February 2019. Web.

    Develop an IT Asset Management Strategy

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}295|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 8.5/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $52,211 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 31 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Asset Management
    • Parent Category Link: /asset-management

    You have a mandate to create an accurate and actionable database of the IT assets in your environment, but:

    • The data you have is often incomplete or wrong.
    • Processes are broken or non-existent.
    • Your tools aren’t up to the task of tracking ever more hardware, software, and relevant metadata.
    • The role of stakeholders outside the core ITAM team isn’t well defined or understood.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    ITAM is a foundational IT service that provides accurate, accessible, actionable data on IT assets. But there’s no value in data for data’s sake. Enable collaboration between IT asset managers, business leaders, and IT leaders to develop an ITAM strategy that maximizes the value they can deliver as service providers.

    Impact and Result

    • Develop an approach and strategy for ITAM that is sustainable and aligned with your business priorities.
    • Clarify the structure for the ITAM program, including scope, responsibility and accountability, centralization vs. decentralization, outsourcing vs. insourcing, and more.
    • Create a practical roadmap to guide improvement.
    • Summarize your strategy and approach using Info-Tech’s templates for review with stakeholders.

    Develop an IT Asset Management Strategy Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Develop an IT Asset Management Strategy – A methodology to create a business-aligned, coherent, and durable approach to ITAM.

    This two-phase, step-by-step methodology will guide you through the activities to build a business-aligned, coherent, and durable approach to ITAM. Review the executive brief at the start of the slide deck for an overview of the methodology and the value it can provide to your organization.

    • Develop an IT Asset Management Strategy – Phases 1-2

    2. ITAM Strategy Template – A presentation-ready repository for the work done as you define your ITAM approach.

    Use this template to document your IT asset management strategy and approach.

    • ITAM Strategy Template

    3. IT Asset Estimations Tracker – A rough-and-ready inventory exercise to help you evaluate the work ahead of you.

    Use this tool to estimate key data points related to your IT asset estate, as well as your confidence in your estimates.

    • IT Asset Estimations Tracker

    Infographic

    Workshop: Develop an IT Asset Management Strategy

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Identify ITAM Priorities & Goals, Maturity, Metrics and KPIs

    The Purpose

    Align key stakeholders to the potential strategic value of the IT asset management practice.

    Ensure the ITAM practice is focused on business-aligned goals.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Define a business-aligned direction and expected outcomes for your ITAM program.

    Activities

    1.1 Brainstorm ITAM opportunities and challenges.

    1.2 Conduct an executive alignment working session.

    1.3 Set ITAM priorities, goals and tactics.

    1.4 Identify target and current state ITAM maturity.

    Outputs

    ITAM opportunities and challenges

    Align executive priorities with ITAM opportunities.

    ITAM metrics and KPIs

    ITAM maturity

    2 Identify Your Approach to Support ITAM Priorities and Goals

    The Purpose

    Translate goals into specific and coherent actions to enable your ITAM practice to deliver business value.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A business-aligned approach to ITAM, encompassing scope, structure, tools, audits, budgets, documentation and more.

    A high-level roadmap to achieve your vision for the ITAM practice.

    Activities

    2.1 Define ITAM scope.

    2.2 Acquire ITAM services (outsourcing and contracting).

    2.3 Centralize or decentralize ITAM capabilities.

    2.4 Create a RACI for the ITAM practice.

    2.5 Align ITAM with other service management practices.

    2.6 Evaluate ITAM tools and integrations.

    2.7 Create a plan for internal and external audits.

    2.8 Improve your budget processes.

    2.9 Establish a documentation framework.

    2.10 Create a roadmap and communication plan.

    Outputs

    Your ITAM approach

    ITAM roadmap and communication plan

    Further reading

    Develop an IT Asset Management Strategy

    Define your business-aligned approach to ITAM.

    Table of Contents

    4 Analyst Perspective

    5 Executive Summary

    17 Phase 1: Establish Business-Aligned ITAM Goals and Priorities

    59 Phase 2: Support ITAM Goals and Priorities

    116 Bibliography

    Develop an IT Asset Management Strategy

    Define your business-aligned approach to ITAM.

    EXECUTIVE BRIEF

    Analyst Perspective

    Track hardware and software. Seems easy, right?

    It’s often taken for granted that IT can easily and accurately provide definitive answers to questions like “how many laptops do we have at Site 1?” or “do we have the right number of SQL licenses?” or “how much do we need to budget for device replacements next year?” After all, don’t we know what we have?

    IT can’t easily provide these answers because to do so you must track hardware and software throughout its lifecycle – which is not easy. And unfortunately, you often need to respond to these questions on very short notice because of an audit or to support a budgeting exercise.

    IT Asset Management (ITAM) is the solution. It’s not a new solution – the discipline has been around for decades. But the key to success is to deploy the practice in a way that is sustainable, right-sized, and maximizes value.

    Use our practical methodology to develop and document your approach to ITAM that is aligned with the goals of your organization.

    Photo of Andrew Sharp, Research Director, Infrastructure & Operations Practice, Info-Tech Research Group.

    Andrew Sharp
    Research Director
    Infrastructure & Operations Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Realize the value of asset management

    Cost optimization, application rationalization and reduction of technical debt are all considered valuable to right-size spending and improve service outcomes. Without access to accurate data, these activities require significant investments of time and effort, starting with creation of point-in-time inventories, which lengthens the timeline to reaching project value and may still not be accurate.

    Cost optimization and reduction of technical debt should be part of your culture and technical roadmap rather than one-off projects. Why? Access to accurate information enables the organization to quickly make decisions and pivot plans as needed. Through asset management, ongoing harvest and redeployment of assets improves utilization-to-spend ratios. We would never see any organization saying, “We’ve closed our year end books, let’s fire the accountants,” but often see this valuable service relegated to the back burner. Similar to the philosophy that “the best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago and the next best time is now,” the sooner you can start to collect, validate, and analyze data, the sooner you will find value in it.

    Photo of Sandi Conrad, Principal Research Director, Infrastructure & Operations Practice, Info-Tech Research Group.

    Sandi Conrad
    Principal Research Director
    Infrastructure & Operations Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    You have a mandate to create an accurate and actionable database of the IT assets in your environment, but:

    • The data you have is often incomplete or wrong.
    • Processes are broken or non-existent.
    • Your tools aren’t up to the task of tracking ever more hardware, software, and relevant metadata.
    • The role of stakeholders outside the core ITAM team isn’t well defined or understood.
    Common Obstacles

    It is challenging to make needed changes because:

    • There’s cultural resistance to asset tracking, it’s seen as busywork that doesn’t clearly create value.
    • Decentralized IT teams aren’t generating the data required to track hardware and licenses.
    • ITAM can’t direct needed tool improvements because the admins don’t report to ITAM.
    • It’s hard to find time to improve processes given the day-to-day demands on your time.
    Info-Tech’s Approach
    • Develop an approach and strategy for ITAM that is sustainable and aligned with your business priorities.
    • Clarify the structure for the ITAM program, including scope, responsibility and accountability, centralization vs. decentralization, outsourcing vs. insourcing, and more.
    • Create a practical roadmap to guide improvement.
    • Summarize your strategy and approach using Info-Tech’s templates for review with stakeholders.

    Info-Tech Insight

    ITAM is a foundational IT service that provides accurate, accessible, actionable data on IT assets. But there’s no value in data for data’s sake. Enable collaboration between IT asset managers, business leaders, and IT leaders to develop an ITAM strategy that maximizes the value they can deliver as service providers.

    Unlock business value with IT asset management

    • IT asset management (ITAM) is the practice of maintaining accurate, accessible, and actionable data on the assets within the organization’s IT estate. Each IT asset will have a record that tracks it across its lifecycle from purchase to disposal.
    • ITAM’s value is realized through other processes and practice areas that can leverage ITAM data to manage risk, improve IT services, and control costs.
    • Develop an approach to ITAM that maximizes the value delivered to the business and IT. ITAM succeeds when its partners succeed at delivering business value, and it fails when it doesn’t show value to those partners.

    This blueprint will help you develop your approach for the management of IT hardware and software, including cloud services. Leverage other Info-Tech methodologies to dive directly into developing hardware asset management procedures, software asset management procedures, or to implement configuration management best practices.

    Info-Tech Members report significant savings from implementing our hardware and software asset management frameworks. In order to maximize value from the process-focused methodologies below, develop your ITAM strategy first.

    Implement Hardware Asset Management (Based on Info-Tech Measured Value Surveys results from clients working through these blueprints, as of February 2022.)

    9.6/10

    $23k

    32

    Overall Impact Average $ Saved Average Days Saved
    Implement Software Asset Management (Based on Info-Tech Measured Value Surveys results from clients working through these blueprints, as of February 2022.)

    9.0/10

    $12k

    5

    Overall Impact Average $ Saved Average Days Saved

    ITAM provides both early and ongoing value

    ITAM isn’t one-and-done. Properly supported, your ITAM practice will deliver up-front value that will help demonstrate the value ongoing ITAM can offer through the maintenance of an accurate, accessible, and actionable ITAM database.

    Example: Software Savings from ITAM



    This chart shows the money saved between the first quote and the final price for software and maintenance by a five-person ITAM team. Over a year and a half, they saved their organization a total of $7.5 million from a first quote total of $21 million over that period.

    This is a perfect example of the direct value that ITAM can provide on an ongoing basis to the organization, when properly supported and integrated with IT and the business.

    Examples of up-front value delivered in the first year of the ITAM practice:

    • Save money by reviewing and renegotiating critical, high-spend, and undermanaged software and service contracts.
    • Redeploy or dispose of clearly unused hardware and software.
    • Develop and enforce standards for basic hardware and software.
    • Improve ITAM data quality and build trust in the results.

    Examples of long-term value from ongoing governance, management, and operational ITAM activities:

    • Optimize spend: Reallocate unused hardware and software, end unneeded service agreements, and manage renewals and audits.
    • Reduce risk: Provide comprehensive asset data for security controls development and incident management; manage equipment disposal.
    • Improve IT service: Support incident, problem, request, and change management with ITAM data. Develop new solutions with an understanding of what you have already.

    Common obstacles

    The rulebook is available, but hard to follow
    • ITAM takes a village, but stakeholders aren’t aware of their role. ITAM processes rely on technicians to update asset records, vendors to supply asset data, administrators to manage tools, leadership to provide direction and support, and more.
    • Constant change in the IT and business environment undermines the accuracy of ITAM records (e.g. licensing and contract changes, technology changes that break discovery tools, personnel and organizational changes).
    • Improvement efforts are overwhelmed by day-to-day activities. One study found that 83% of SAM teams’ time is consumed by audit-related activities. (Flexera State of ITAM Report 2022) A lack of improvement becomes a vicious cycle when stakeholders who don’t see the value of ITAM decline to dedicate resources for improvement.
    • Stakeholders expect ITAM tools to be a cure-all, but even at their best, they can’t provide needed answers without some level of configuration, manual input, and supervision.
    • There’s often a struggle to connect ITAM to value. For example, respondents to Info-Tech’s Management & Governance Diagnostic consistently rank ITAM as less important than other processes that ITAM directly supports (e.g. budget management and budget optimization). (Info-Tech MGD Diagnostic (n=972 unique organizations))
    ITAM is a mature discipline with well-established standards, certifications, and tools, but we still struggle with it.
    • Only 28% of SAM teams track IaaS and PaaS spend, and only 35% of SAM teams track SaaS usage.
    • Increasing SAM maturity is a challenge for 76% of organizations.
    • 10% of organizations surveyed have spent more than $5 million in the last three years in audit penalties and true-ups.
    • Half of all of organizations lack a viable SAM tool.
    • Seventy percent of SAM teams have a shortfall of qualified resources.
    • (Flexera State of ITAM Report 2022)

    Info-Tech's IT Asset Management Framework (ITAM)

    Adopt, manage, and mature activities to enable business value thorugh actionable, accessible, and accurate ITAM data

    Logo for Info-Tech Research Group. Enable Business Value Logo for #iTRG.
    Business-Aligned Spend
    Optimization and Transparency
    Facilitate IT Services
    and Products
    Actionable, Accessible,
    and Accurate Data
    Context-Aware Risk Management
    and Security Controls

    Plan & Govern

    Business Goals, Risks, and Structure
    • ITAM Goals & Priorities
    • Roles, Accountability, Responsibilities
    • Scope
    Ongoing Management Commitment
    • Resourcing & Funding
    • Policies & Enforcement
    • Continuous Improvement
    Culture
    • ITAM Education, Awareness & Training
    • Organizational Change Management
    Section title 'Operate' with a cycle surrounding key components of Operate: 'Data Collection & Validation', 'Tool Administration', 'License Management', and 'Lease Management'. The cycle consists of 'Request', 'Procure', 'Receive', 'Deploy', 'Manage', 'Retire & Dispose', and back to 'Request'.

    Build & Manage

    Tools & Data
    • ITAM Tool Selection & Deployment
    • Configuration Management Synchronization
    • IT Service Management Integration
    Process
    • Process Management
    • Data & Process Audits
    • Document Management
    People, Policies, and Providers
    • Stakeholder Management
    • Technology Standardization
    • Vendor & Contract Management

    Info-Tech Insight

    ITAM is a foundational IT service that provides actionable, accessible, and accurate data on IT assets. But there's no value in data for data's sake. Use this methodology to enable collaboration between ITAM, the business, and IT to develop an approach to ITAM that maximizes the value the ITAM team can deliver as service providers.

    Key deliverable

    IT asset management requires ongoing practice – you can’t just implement it and walk away.

    Our methodology will help you build a business-aligned strategy and approach for your ITAM practice with the following outputs:

    • Business-aligned ITAM priorities, opportunities, and goals.
    • Current and target state ITAM maturity.
    • Metrics and KPIs.
    • Roles, responsibilities, and accountability.
    • Insourcing, outsourcing, and (de)centralization.
    • Tools and technology.
    • A documentation framework.
    • Initiatives, a roadmap, and a communication plan.
    Each step of this blueprint is designed to help you create your IT asset management strategy:
    Sample of Info-Tech's key deliverable 'IT Asset Management' blueprint.

    Info-Tech’s methodology to develop an IT asset management strategy

    1. Establish business-aligned ITAM goals and priorities 2. Identify your approach to support ITAM priorities and goals
    Phase Steps
    • 1.1 Define ITAM and brainstorm opportunities and challenges.
    • Executive Alignment Working Session:
    • 1.2 Review organizational priorities, strategy, and key initiatives.
    • 1.3 Align executive priorities with ITAM opportunities and priorities.
    • 1.4 Identify business-aligned ITAM goals and target maturity.
    • 1.5 Write mission and vision statements.
    • 1.6 Define ITAM metrics and KPIs.
    • 2.1 Define ITAM scope.
    • 2.2 Acquire ITAM services (outsourcing and contracting).
    • 2.3 Centralize or decentralize ITAM capabilities.
    • 2.4 Create a RACI for the ITAM practice.
    • 2.5 Align ITAM with other service management practices.
    • 2.6 Evaluate ITAM tools and integrations.
    • 2.7 Create a plan for internal and external audits.
    • 2.8 Improve your budget processes.
    • 2.9 Establish a documentation framework.
    • 2.10 Create a roadmap and communication plan.
    Phase Outcomes Defined, business-aligned goals and priorities for ITAM. Establish an approach to achieving ITAM goals and priorities including scope, structure, tools, service management integrations, documentation, and more.
    Project Outcomes Develop an approach and strategy for ITAM that is sustainable and aligned with your business priorities.

    Insight Summary

    There’s no value in data for data’s sake

    ITAM is a foundational IT service that provides accurate, accessible, actionable data on IT assets. Enable collaboration between IT asset managers, business leaders, and IT leaders to develop an approach to ITAM that maximizes the value they can deliver as service providers.

    Service provider to a service provider

    ITAM is often viewed (when it’s viewed at all) as a low-value administrative task that doesn’t directly drive business value. This can make it challenging to build a case for funding and resources.

    Your ITAM strategy is a critical component to help you define how ITAM can best deliver value to your organization, and to stop creating data for the sake of data or just to fight the next fire.

    Collaboration over order-taking

    To align ITAM practices to deliver organizational value, you need a very clear understanding of the organization’s goals – both in the moment and as they change over time.

    Ensure your ITAM team has clear line of sight to business strategy, objectives, and decision-makers, so you can continue to deliver value as priorities change

    Embrace dotted lines

    ITAM teams rely heavily on staff, systems, and data beyond their direct area of control. Identify how you will influence key stakeholders, including technicians, administrators, and business partners.

    Help them understand how ITAM success relies on their support, and highlight how their contributions have created organizational value to encourage ongoing support.

    Project benefits

    Benefits for IT
    • Set a foundation and direction for an ITAM practice that will allow IT to manage risk, optimize spend, and enhance services in line with business requirements.
    • Establish accountability and responsibility for essential ITAM activities. Decide where to centralize or decentralize accountability and authority. Identify where outsourcing could add value.
    • Create a roadmap with concrete, practical next steps to develop an effective, right-sized ITAM practice.
    Stock image of a trophy. Benefits for the business
    • Plan and control technology spend with confidence based on trustworthy ITAM data.
    • Enhance IT’s ability to rapidly and effectively support new priorities and launch new projects. Effective ITAM can support more streamlined procurement, deployment, and management of assets.
    • Implement security controls that reflect your total technology footprint. Reduce the risk that a forgotten device or unmanaged software turns your organization into the next Colonial Pipeline.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Guided Implementation

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI around 12 calls over the course of 6 months.

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Call #1: Scope requirements, objectives, and your specific challenges.

    Call #2: Review business priorities.

    Call #3: Identify ITAM goals & target maturity.

    Call #4: Identify metrics and KPIs. Call #5: Define ITAM scope.

    Call #6: Acquire ITAM services.

    Call #7: ITAM structure and RACI.

    Call #8: ITAM and service management.

    Tools and integrations.

    Call #10: Internal and external audits.

    Call #11: Budgets & documentation

    Call #12: Roadmap, comms plan. Wrap-up.

    Phase 1 Phase 2

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com1-888-670-8889
    Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
    Identify ITAM priorities & goals, maturity, metrics and KPIs
    Identify your approach to support ITAM priorities and goals
    Next Steps and wrap-Up (offsite)
    Activities

    1.1 Define ITAM.

    1.2 Brainstorm ITAM opportunities and challenges.

    Conduct an executive alignment working session:

    1.3 Review organizational priorities, strategy, and key initiatives.

    1.4 Align executive priorities with ITAM opportunities.

    1.5 Set ITAM priorities.

    2.1 Translate opportunities into ITAM goals and tactics.

    2.2 Identify target and current state ITAM maturity.

    2.3 Create mission and vision statements.

    2.4 Identify key ITAM metrics and KPIs.

    3.1 Define ITAM scope.

    3.2 Acquire ITAM services (outsourcing and contracting)

    3.3 Centralize or decentralize ITAM capabilities.

    3.4 Create a RACI for the ITAM practice.

    3.5 Align ITAM with other service management practices.

    3.6 Evaluate ITAM tools and integrations.

    4.1 Create a plan for internal and external audits.

    4.2 Improve your budget processes.

    4.3 Establish a documentation framework and identify documentation gaps.

    4.4 Create a roadmap and communication plan.

    5.1 Complete in-progress deliverables from previous four days.

    5.2 Set up review time for workshop deliverables and to discuss next steps.

    Deliverables
    1. ITAM opportunities and challenges.
    2. Align executive priorities with ITAM opportunities.
    3. Set ITAM priorities.
    1. ITAM goals and tactics.
    2. Current and target ITAM maturity.
    3. Mission and vision statements.
    4. ITAM metrics and KPIs.
    1. Decisions that will shape your ITAM approach, including:
      1. What’s in scope (hardware, software, and cloud services).
      2. Where to centralize, decentralize, or outsource ITAM activities.
      3. Accountability, responsibility, and structure for ITAM activities.
      4. Service management alignment, tooling gaps, audit plans, budget processes, and required documentation.
    2. A roadmap and communication plan.
    1. Your completed ITAM strategy template.
    Develop an IT Asset Management Strategy

    Phase 1:

    Establish business-aligned ITAM goals and priorities

    Phase 1

    1.1 Define ITAM and brainstorm opportunities and challenges.

    Executive Alignment Working Session:

    1.2 Review organizational priorities, strategy, and key initiatives.

    1.3 Align executive priorities with ITAM opportunities & priorities.

    1.4 Identify business-aligned ITAM goals and target maturity.

    1.5 Write mission and vision statements.

    1.6 Define ITAM metrics and KPIs.

    Phase 2

    2.1 Define ITAM scope.

    2.2 Acquire ITAM services (outsourcing and contracting).

    2.3 Centralize or decentralize ITAM capabilities.

    2.4 Create a RACI for the ITAM practice.

    2.5 Align ITAM with other service management practices.

    2.6 Evaluate ITAM tools and integrations.

    2.7 Create a plan for internal and external audits.

    2.8 Improve your budget processes.

    2.9 Establish a documentation framework.

    2.10 Create a roadmap and communication plan.

    Phase Outcomes:

    Defined, business-aligned goals, priorities, and KPIs for ITAM. A concise vision and mission statement. The direction you need to establish a practical, right-sized, effective approach to ITAM for your organization.

    Before you get started

    Set yourself up for success with these three steps:
    • This methodology and the related slides are intended to be executed via intensive, collaborative working sessions using the rest of this slide deck.
    • Ensure the working sessions are a success by working through these steps before you start work on your IT asset management strategy.

    1. Identify participants

    Review recommended roles and identify who should participate in the development of your ITAM strategy.

    2. Estimate assets managed today

    Work through an initial assessment to establish ease of access to ITAM data and your level of trust in the data available to you.

    3. Create a working folder

    Create a repository to house your notes and any work in progress, including your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template.

    0.1 Identify participants

    30 minutes

    Output: List of key roles for the strategy exercises outlined in this methodology

    Participants: Project sponsor, Lead facilitator, ITAM manager and SMEs

    This methodology relies on having the right stakeholders in the room to identify ITAM goals, challenges, roles, structure, and more. On each activity slide in this deck, you’ll see an outline of the recommended participants. Use the table below to translate the recommended roles into specific people in your organization. Note that some people may fill multiple roles.

    Role Expectations People
    Project Sponsor Accountable for the overall success of the methodology. Ideally, participates in all exercises in this methodology. May be the asset manager or whoever they report to. Jake Long
    Lead Facilitator Leads, schedules, and manages all working sessions. Guides discussions and ensures activity outputs are completed. Owns and understands the methodology. Has a working knowledge of ITAM. Robert Loblaw
    Asset Manager(s) SME for the ITAM practice. Provides strategic direction to mature ITAM practices in line with organizational goals. Supports the facilitator. Eve Maldonado
    ITAM Team Hands-on ITAM professionals and SMEs. Includes the asset manager. Provide input on tactical ITAM opportunities and challenges. Bruce Wayne, Clark Kent
    IT Leaders & Managers Leaders of key stakeholder groups from across the IT department – the CIO and direct reports. Provide input on what IT needs from ITAM, and the role their teams should play in ITAM activities. May include delegates, particularly those familiar with day-to-day processes relevant to a particular discussion or exercise. Marcelina Hardy, Edmund Broughton
    ITAM Business Partners Non-IT business stakeholders for ITAM. This could include procurement, vendor management, accounting, and others. Zhang Jin, Effie Lamont
    Business Executives Organizational leaders and executives (CFO, COO, CEO, and others) or their delegates. Will participate in a mini-workshop to identify organizational goals and initiatives that can present opportunities for the ITAM practice. Jermaine Mandar, Miranda Kosuth

    0.2 Estimate asset numbers

    1 hour

    Output: Estimates of quantity and spend related to IT assets, Confidence/margin of error on estimates

    Participants: IT asset manager, ITAM team

    What do you know about your current IT environment, and how confident are you in that knowledge?

    This exercise will help you evaluate the size of the challenge ahead in terms of the raw number of assets in your environment, the spend on those assets, and the level of trust your organization has in the ITAM data.

    It is also a baseline snapshot your ability to relay key ITAM metrics quickly and confidently, so you can measure progress (in terms of greater confidence) over time.

    1. Download the estimation tracker below. Add any additional line items that are particularly important to the organization.
    2. Time-box this exercise to an hour. Use your own knowledge and existing data repositories to identify count/spend for each line item, then add a margin of error to your guess. Larger margins of error on larger counts will typically indicate larger risks.
    3. Track any assumptions, data sources used, or SMEs consulted in the comments.

    Download the IT Asset Estimation Tracker

    “Any time there is doubt about the data and it doesn’t get explained or fixed, then a new spreadsheet is born. Data validation and maintenance is critical to avoid the hidden costs of having bad data”

    Allison Kinnaird,
    Operations Practice Lead,
    Info-Tech Research Group

    0.3 Create a working folder

    15 minutes

    Output: A repository for templates and work in progress

    Participants: Lead facilitator

    Create a central repository for collaboration – it seems like an obvious step, but it’s one that gets forgotten about
    1. Download a copy of the ITAM Strategy Template.
      1. This will be the repository for all the work you do in the activities listed in this blueprint; take a moment to read it through and familiarize yourself with the contents.
    2. House the template in a shared repository that can house other related work in progress. Share this folder with participants so they can check in on your progress.
    3. You’ll see this callout box: Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template as you work through activities in this blueprint. Copy the output to the appropriate slide in the ITAM Strategy Template.
    Stock image of a computer screen with a tiny person putting likes on things.

    Collect action items as you go

    Don’t wait until the end to write down your good ideas.
    • The last exercise in this methodology is to gather everything you’ve learned and build a roadmap to improve the ITAM practice.
    • The output of the exercises will inform the roadmap, as they will highlight areas with opportunities for improvement.
    • Write them down as you work through the exercises, or you risk forgetting valuable ideas.
    • Keep an “idea space” – a whiteboard with sticky notes or a shared document – to which any of your participants can post an idea for improvement and that you can review and consolidate later.
    • Encourage participants to add their ideas at any time during the exercises.
    Pad of sticky notes, the top of which reads 'Good ideas go here!'

    Step 1.1: Brainstorm ITAM opportunities and challenges

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers
    • ITAM business partners

    Outcomes

    • Rally the working group around a collection of ideas that, when taken together, create a vision for the future ITAM practice.
    • Identify your organization’s current ITAM challenges.

    “ITAM is a cultural shift more than a technology shift.” (Rory Canavan, SAM Charter)

    What is an IT Asset?

    Any piece of technology can be considered an asset, but it doesn’t mean you need to track everything. Image of three people building a computer from the inside.
    Icon of a power button.

    According to the ISO 19770 standard on ITAM, an IT Asset is “[an] item, thing, or entity that can be used to acquire, process, store and distribute digital information and has potential or actual value to an organization.”
    These are all things that IT is expected to support and manage, or that have the potential to directly impact services that IT supports and manages.

    Icon of a half-full battery.

    IT assets are distinct from capital assets. Some IT assets will also be capital assets, but not all will be. And not all capital assets are IT assets, either.

    Icon of a microphone.

    IT assets are typically tracked by IT, not by finance or accounting.
    IT needs more from their IT asset tracking system than the typical finance department can deliver.
    This can include end-user devices, software, IT infrastructure, cloud-based resources, third-party managed IT services, Internet-of-Things devices, embedded electronics, SCADA equipment, “smart” devices, and more.

    Icon of a fingerprint.

    It’s important to track IT assets in a way that enables IT to deliver value to the business – and an important part of this is understanding what not to track. This list should be aligned to the needs of your organization.

    What is IT asset management?

    • IT asset management is the practice of maintaining accurate, accessible, and actionable data on IT hardware, software, and cloud assets from procurement to disposal.
    • Trustworthy data maintained by an IT asset management practice will help your business meet its goals by managing risk, controlling costs, and enabling IT services and products.
    • ITAM tends to focus on the asset itself – its technical, financial, contractual, lifecycle, and ownership attributes – rather than its interactions or connections to other IT assets, which tends to be part of configuration management.

    What IT Asset Management is NOT:

    Configuration Management: Configuration management databases (CMDBs) often draw from the same data pool as ITAM (many configuration items are assets, and vice versa), but they focus on the interaction, interconnection, and interoperation of configuration items within the IT estate.

    In practice, many configuration items will be IT assets (or parts of assets) and vice versa. Configuration and asset teams should work closely together as they develop different but complementary views of the IT environment. Use Info-Tech’s methodology to harness configuration management superpowers.

    Organizational Data Management: Leverage a different Info-Tech methodology to develop a digital and data asset management program within Info-Tech’s DAM framework.

    “Asset management’s job is not to save the organization money, it’s not to push back on software audits.

    It’s to keep the asset database as up-to-date and as trustworthy as possible. That’s it.” (Jeremy Boerger, Consultant & Author)

    “You can’t make any real decisions on CMDB data that’s only 60% accurate.

    You start extrapolating that out, you’re going to get into big problems.” (Mike Austin, Founder & CEO, MetrixData 360)

    What is an ITAM strategy?

    Our strategy document will outline a coherent, sustainable, business-aligned approach to ITAM.

    No single approach to ITAM fits all organizations. Nor will the same approach fit the same organization at different times. A world-leading research university, a state government, and a global manufacturer all have very different goals and priorities that will be best supported by different approaches to ITAM.

    This methodology will walk you through these critical decisions that will define your approach to ITAM:

    • Business-aligned priorities, opportunities, and goals: What pressing opportunities and challenges do we face as an organization? What opportunities does this create that ITAM can seize?
    • Current and future state maturity, challenges: What is the state of the practice today? Where do we need to improve to meet our goals? What challenges stand in the way of improvement?
    • Responsibility, accountability, sourcing and (de)centralization: Who does what? Who is accountable? Where is there value to outsourcing? What authority will be centralized or decentralized?
    • Tools, policies, and procedures: What technology do we need? What’s our documentation framework?
    • Initiatives, KPIs, communication plan, and roadmap: What do we need to do, in what order, to build the ITAM practice to where we need it to be? How long do we expect this to take? How will we measure success?

    “A good strategy has coherence, coordinating actions, policies, and resources so as to accomplish an important end. Most organizations, most of the time, don’t have this.

    Instead, they have multiple goals and initiatives that symbolize progress, but no coherent approach to accomplish that progress other than ‘spend more and try harder.’” (Good Strategy, Bad Strategy, Richard Rumelt)

    Enable business value with IT asset management

    If you’ve never experienced a mature ITAM program before, it is almost certainly more rewarding than you’d expect once it’s functioning as intended.

    Each of the below activities can benefit from accessible, actionable, and accurate ITAM data.

    • Which of the activities, practices, and initiatives below have value to your organization?
    • Which could benefit most from ITAM data?
    Manage Risk: Effective ITAM practices provide data and processes that help mitigate the likelihood and impact of potentially damaging IT risks.

    ITAM supports the following practices that help manage organizational risk:

    • Security Controls Development
    • Security Incident Response
    • Security Audit Reports
    • Regulatory Compliance Reports
    • IT Risk Management
    • Technical Debt Management
    • M&A Due Diligence
    Optimize Spend: Asset data is essential to maintaining oversight of IT spend, ensuring that scarce resources are allocated where they can have the most impact.

    ITAM supports these activities that help optimize spend:

    • Vendor Management & Negotiations
    • IT Budget Management & Variance Analysis
    • Asset Utilization Analysis
    • FinOps & Cloud Spend Optimization
    • Showback & Chargeback
    • Software Audit Defense
    • Application Rationalization
    • Contract Consolidation
    • License and Device Reallocation
    Improve IT Services: Asset data can help inform solutions development and can be used by service teams to enhance and improve IT service practices.

    Use ITAM to facilitate these IT services and initiatives:

    • Solution and Enterprise Architecture
    • Service Level Management
    • Technology Procurement
    • Technology Refresh Projects
    • Incident & Problem Management
    • Request Management
    • Change Management
    • Green IT

    1.1 Brainstorm ideas to create a vision for the ITAM practice

    30 minutes

    Input: Stakeholders with a vision of what ITAM could provide, if resourced and funded adequately

    Output: A collection of ideas that, when taken together, create a vision for the future ITAM practice

    Materials: ITAM strategy template, Whiteboard or virtual whiteboard

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers, ITAM business partners

    It can be easy to lose sight of long-term goals when you’re stuck in firefighting mode. Let’s get the working group into a forward-looking mindset with this exercise.

    Think about what ITAM could deliver with unlimited time, money, and technology.

    1. Provide three sticky notes to each participant.
    2. Add the headings to a whiteboard, or use a blank slide as a digital whiteboard
    3. On each sticky note, ask participants to outline a single idea as follows:
      1. We could: [idea]
      2. Which would help: [stakeholder]
      3. Because: [outcome]
    4. Ask participants to present their sticky notes and post them to the whiteboard. Ask later participants to group similar ideas together.

    As you hear your peers describe what they hope and expect to achieve with ITAM, a shared vision of what ITAM could be will start to emerge.

    1.1 Identify structural ITAM challenges

    30 minutes

    Input: The list of common challenges on the next slide, Your estimated visibility into IT assets from the previous exercise, The experience and knowledge of your participants

    Output: Identify current ITAM challenges

    Materials: Your working copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers, ITAM business partners

    What’s standing in the way today of delivering the ITAM practices you want to achieve?

    Review the list of common challenges on the next slide as a group.

    1. Delete any challenges that don’t apply to your organization.
    2. Modify any challenges as required to reflect your organization.
    3. Add further challenges that aren’t on the list, as required.
    4. Highlight challenges that are particularly painful.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    “The problem – the reason why asset management initiatives keep falling on their face – is that people attack asset management as a problem to solve, instead of a practice and epistemological construct.” (Jeremy Boerger, Consultant & Author)

    1.1 Identify structural ITAM challenges

    Review and update the list of common challenges below to reflect your own organization.

    • Leadership and executives don’t understand the value of asset management and don’t fund or resource it.
    • Tools aren’t fit for purpose, don’t scale, or are broken.
    • There’s a cultural tendency to focus on tools over processes.
    • ITAM data is fragmented across multiple repositories.
    • ITAM data is widely viewed as untrustworthy.
    • Stakeholders respond to vendor audits before consulting ITAM, which leads to confusion and risks penalties.
    • No time for improvement; we’re always fighting fires.
    • We don’t audit our own ITAM data for accuracy.
    • End-user equipment is shared, re-assigned, or disposed without notifying or involving IT.
    • No dedicated resources.
    • Lack of clarity on roles and responsibilities.
    • Technicians don’t track assets consistently; ITAM is seen as administrative busywork.
    • Many ITAM tasks are manual and prone to error.
    • Inconsistent organizational policies and procedures.
    • We try to manage too many hardware types/software titles.
    • IT is not involved in the procurement process.
    • Request and procurement is seen as slow and excessively bureaucratic.
    • Hardware/software standards don’t exist or aren’t enforced.
    • Extensive rogue purchases/shadow IT are challenging to manage via ITAM tools and processes.
    What Else?

    Copy results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Step 1.2: Review organizational priorities, strategy, initiatives

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers
    • Business executives or their delegates

    Outcomes

    • Review organizational priorities and strategy.
    • Identify key initiatives.

    Enter the executives

    Deliver on leadership priorities

    • Your business’ major transformative projects and executive priorities might seem far removed from hardware and software tracking. Why would we start with business strategy and executive priorities as we’re setting goals for the ITAM program?
    • While business executives have (likely) no interest in how software and hardware is tracked, they are accountable for the outcomes ITAM can enable. They are the most likely to understand why and how ITAM can deliver value to the organization.
    • ITAM succeeds by enabling its stakeholders to achieve business outcomes. The next three activities are designed to help you identify how you can enable your stakeholders, and what outcomes are most important from their point of view. Specifically:
      • What are the business’ planned transformational initiatives?
      • What are your highest priority goals?
      • What should the priorities of the ITAM practice be?
    • The answers to these questions will shape your approach to ITAM. Direct input from your leadership and executives – or their delegates – will help ensure you’re setting a solid foundation for your ITAM practice.

    “What outcomes does the organization want from IT asset management? Often, senior managers have a clear vision for the organization and where IT needs to go, and the struggle is to communicate that down.” (Kylie Fowler, ITAM Intelligence)

    Stock image of many hands with different puzzle pieces.

    Executive Alignment Session Overview

    ITAM Strategy Working Sessions

    • Discover & Brainstorm
    • Executive Alignment Working Session
      • 1.2 Review organizational strategy, priorities, and key initiatives
      • 1.3 Align executive priorities with ITAM opportunities, set ITAM priorities
    • ITAM Practice Maturity, Vision & Mission, Metrics & KPIs
    • Scope, Outsourcing, (De)Centralization, RACI
    • Service Management Integration
    • ITAM Tools
    • Audits, Budgets, Documents
    • Roadmap & Comms Plan

    A note to the lead facilitator and project sponsor:
    Consider working through these exercises by yourself ahead of time. As you do so, you’ll develop your own ideas about where these discussions may go, which will help you guide the discussion and provide examples to participants.

    1.2 Review organizational strategy and priorities

    30 minutes

    Input: Organizational strategy documents

    Output: A list of prioritized organizational goals, An initial assessment of how ITAM can support these goals

    Materials: The diagram in the next slide, and/or a whiteboard, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: Asset manager, IT leadership, Business executives or delegates

    Welcome your group to the working session and outline the next few exercises using the previous slide.

    Ask the most senior leader present to provide a summary of the following:

    1. What is the vision for the organization?
    2. What are our priorities and what must we absolutely get right?
    3. What do we expect the organization to look like in three years?

    The facilitator or a dedicated note-taker should record key points on a whiteboard or flipchart paper.

    1.2 Identify transformational initiatives

    30 minutes

    Input: Organizational strategy documents

    Output: A list of prioritized organizational goals, An initial assessment of how ITAM can support these goals

    Materials: The diagram in the next slide, and/or a whiteboard, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: Asset manager, IT leadership, Business executives or delegates

    Ask the most senior leader present to provide a summary of the following: What transformative business and IT initiatives are planned? When will they begin and end?

    Using one box per initiative, draw the initiatives in a timeline like the one below.

    Sample timeline for ITAM initiatives.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Step 1.3: Set business-aligned ITAM priorities

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers
    • Business executives

    Outcomes

    • Connect executive priorities to ITAM opportunities.
    • Set business-aligned priorities for the ITAM practice.

    1.3 Align executive priorities with ITAM opportunities

    45 minutes

    Input: Organizational strategy documents

    Output: A list of prioritized organizational goals, An initial assessment of how ITAM can support these goals

    Materials: The diagram in the next slide, and/or a whiteboard, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: Asset manager, IT leaders and managers, Business executives or delegates

    In this exercise, we’ll use the table on the next slide to identify the top priorities of key business and IT stakeholders and connect them to opportunities for the ITAM practice.

    1. Ask your leadership or executive delegates – what are their goals? What are they trying to accomplish? List roles and related goals in the table.
    2. Brainstorm opportunities for IT asset management to support listed goals:
      1. Can ITAM provide an enhanced level of service, access, or insight?
      2. Can ITAM address an existing issue or mitigate an existing risk?

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    1.3 Align executive priorities with ITAM opportunities (example)

    ITAM is for the… Who wants to… Which presents these ITAM opportunities
    CEO Deliver transformative business initiatives Acquire the right tech at the right time to support transformational initiatives.
    Establish a data-driven culture of stewardship Improve data to increase IT spend transparency.
    COO Improve organizational efficiency Increase asset use.
    Consolidate major software contracts to drive discounts.
    CFO Accurately forecast spending Track and anticipate IT asset spending.
    Control spending Improve data to increase IT spend transparency.
    Consolidate major software contracts to drive discounts.
    CIO Demonstrate IT value Use data to tell a story about value delivered by IT assets.
    Govern IT use Improve data to increase IT spend transparency.
    CISO Manage IT security and compliance risks Identify abandoned or out-of-spec IT assets.
    Provide IT asset data to support controls development.
    Respond to security incidents Support security incident teams with IT asset data.
    Apps Leader Build, integrate, and support applications Identify opportunities to retire applications with redundant functionality.
    Connect applications to relevant licensing and support agreements.
    IT Infra Leader Build and support IT infrastructure. Provide input on opportunities to standardize hardware and software.
    Provide IT asset data to technicians supporting end users.

    1.3 Categorize ITAM opportunities

    10-15 minutes

    Input: The outputs from the previous exercise

    Output: Executive priorities, sorted into the three categories at the right

    Materials: The table in this slide, The outputs from the previous exercise

    Participants: Lead facilitator

    Give your participants a quick break. Quickly sort the identified ITAM opportunities into the three main categories below as best you can.

    We’ll use this table as context for the next exercise.

    Example: Optimize Spend Enhance IT Services Manage Risk
    ITAM Opportunities
    • Improve data to increase IT spend transparency.
    • Consolidate major software contracts to drive discounts.
    • Increase asset utilization.
    • Identify opportunities to retire applications with redundant functionality
    • Acquire the right tech at the right time to support transformational initiatives.
    • Provide IT asset data to technicians supporting end users.
    • Identify abandoned or out-of-spec IT assets.
    • Provide IT asset data to support controls development.
    • Support security incident teams with IT asset data.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    1.3 Set ITAM priorities

    30 minutes

    Input: Organizational strategy documents

    Output: A list of prioritized organizational goals, An initial assessment of how ITAM can support these goals

    Materials: Whiteboard, The template on the next slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: Asset manager, IT leaders and managers, Business executives or delegates

    The objective of this exercise is to prioritize the outcomes your organization wants to achieve from its ITAM practice, given the context from the previous exercises.

    Review the image below. The three points of the triangle are the three core goals of ITAM: Enhance IT Service, Manage Risk, and Optimize Spend. This exercise was first developed by Kylie Fowler of ITAM Intelligence. It is an essential exercise to understand ITAM priorities and the tradeoffs associated with those priorities. These priorities aren’t set in stone and should be revisited periodically as technology and business priorities change.

    Draw the diagram on the next slide on a whiteboard. Have the most senior leader in the room place the dot on the triangle – the closer it is to any one of the goals, the more important that goal is to the organization. Note: The center of the triangle is off limits! It’s very rarely possible to deliver on all three at once.
    Track notes on what’s being prioritized – and why – in the template on the next slide.
    Triangle with the points labelled 'Enhance IT Service', 'Manage Risk', and 'Optimize Spend'.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    1.3 Set ITAM Priorities

    The priorities of the ITAM practice are to:
    • Optimize Spend
    • Manage Risk
    Why?
    • We believe there is significant opportunity right now to rationalize spend by consolidating key software contracts.
    • Major acquisitions are anticipated in the near future. Effective ITAM processes are expected to mitigate acquisition risk by supporting due diligence and streamlined integration of acquired organizations.
    • Ransomware and supply chain security threats have increased demands for a comprehensive accounting of IT assets to support security controls development and security incident response.
    (Update this section with notes from your discussion.)
    Triangle with the points labelled 'Enhance IT Service', 'Manage Risk', and 'Optimize Spend'. There is a dot close to the 'Optimize Spend' corner, a legend labelling the dot as 'Our Target', and a note reading 'Move this dot to reflect your priorities'.

    Step 1.4: Identify ITAM goals, target maturity

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers

    Outcomes

    • Connect executive priorities to ITAM opportunities.
    • Set business-aligned priorities for the ITAM practice.

    “ITAM is really no different from the other ITIL practices: to succeed, you’ll need some ratio of time, treasure, and talent… and you can make up for less of one with more of the other two.” (Jeremy Boerger, Consultant and Author)

    1.4 Identify near- and medium-term goals

    15-30 minutes

    Input: Organizational strategy documents

    Output: A list of prioritized organizational goals, An initial assessment of how ITAM can support these goals

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers

    Narrow down the list of opportunities to identify specific goals for the ITAM practice.

    1. Use one color to highlight opportunities you will seize in the next year.
    2. Use a second color to highlight opportunities you plan to address in the next three years.
    3. Leave blank anything you don’t intend to address in this timeframe.

    The highlighted opportunities are your near- and medium-term objectives.

    Optimize Spend Enhance IT Services Manage Risk
    Priority Critical Normal High
    ITAM Opportunities
    • Improve data to increase IT spend transparency.
    • Increase asset utilization.
    • Consolidate major software contracts to drive discounts.
    • Identify opportunities to retire applications with redundant functionality
    • Acquire the right tech at the right time to support transformational initiatives.
    • Provide IT asset data to technicians supporting end users.
    • Identify abandoned or out-of-spec IT assets.
    • Provide IT asset data to support controls development.
    • Support security incident teams with IT asset data.

    1.4 Connect ITAM goals to tactics

    30 minutes

    Input: Organizational strategy documents

    Output: A list of prioritized organizational goals, An initial assessment of how ITAM can support these goals

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers

    Let’s dig down a little deeper. Connect the list of opportunities from earlier to specific ITAM tactics that allow the team to seize those opportunities.

    Add another row to the earlier table for ITAM tactics. Brainstorm tactics with your participants (e.g. sticky notes on a whiteboard) and align them with the priorities they’ll support.

    Optimize SpendEnhance IT ServicesManage Risk
    PriorityCriticalNormalHigh
    ITAM Opportunities
    • Improve data to increase IT spend transparency.
    • Increase asset utilization.
    • Consolidate major software contracts to drive discounts.
    • Identify opportunities to retire applications with redundant functionality
    • Acquire the right tech at the right time to support transformational initiatives.
    • Provide IT asset data to technicians supporting end users.
    • Identify abandoned or out-of-spec IT assets.
    • Provide IT asset data to support controls development.
    • Support security incident teams with IT asset data.
    ITAM Tactics to Seize Opportunities
    • Review and improve hardware budgeting exercises.
    • Reallocate unused licenses, hardware.
    • Ensure ELP reports are up to date.
    • Validate software usage.
    • Data to support software renewal negotiations.
    • Use info from ITAM for more efficient adds, moves, changes.
    • Integrate asset records with the ticket intake system, so that when someone calls the service desk, the list of their assigned equipment is immediately available.
    • Find and retire abandoned devices or services with access to the organization’s network.
    • Report on lost/stolen devices.
    • Develop reliable disposal processes.
    • Report on unpatched devices/software.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    1.4 Identify current and target state

    20 minutes

    Input: Organizational strategy documents

    Output: A list of prioritized organizational goals, An initial assessment of how ITAM can support these goals

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers

    We’ll use this exercise to identify the current and one-year target state of ITAM using Info-Tech’s ITAM maturity framework.

    1. Review the maturity framework on the next slide as a group.
    2. In one color, highlight statements that reflect your organization today. Summarize your current state. Are you in firefighter mode? Between “firefighter” and “trusted operator”?
    3. In a second color, highlight statements that reflect where you want to be one year from today, taking into consideration the goals and tactics identified in the last exercise.
    4. During a break, copy the highlighted statements to the table on the slide after next, then add this final slide to your working copy of the ITAM Strategy Template.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Establish current and target ITAM maturity

    IT maturity ladder with five color-coded levels. Innovator – Optimized Asset Management
    • All items from Business & Technology Partner, plus:
    • Business and IT stakeholders collaborate regularly with the ITAM team to identify new opportunities to leverage or deploy ITAM practices and data to mitigate risks, optimize spend, and improve service. The ITAM program scales with the business.
    Business & Technology Partner – Proactive Asset Management
    • All items from Trusted Operator, plus:
    • The ITAM data is integral to decisions related to budget, project planning, IT architecture, contract renewal, and vendor management. Software and cloud assets are reviewed as frequently as required to manage costs. ITAM data consumers have self-serve access to ITAM data.
    • Continuous improvement practices strengthen ITAM efficiency and effectiveness.
    • ITAM processes, standards, and related policies are regularly reviewed and updated. ITAM teams work closely with SMEs for key tools/systems integrated with ITAM (e.g. AD, ITSM, monitoring tools) to maximize the value and reliability of integrations.
    Trusted Operator – Controls Assets
    • ITAM data for deployed hardware and software is regularly audited for accuracy.
    • Sufficient staff and skills to support asset tracking, including a dedicated IT asset management role. Teams responsible for ITAM data collection cooperate effectively. Policies and procedures are documented and enforced. Key licenses and contracts are available to the ITAM team. Discovery, tracking, and analysis tools support most important use cases.
    Firefighter – Reactive Asset Tracking
    • Data is often untrustworthy, may be fragmented across multiple repositories, and typically requires significant effort to translate or validate before use.
    • Insufficient staff, fragmented or incomplete policies or documentation. Data tracking processes are extremely highly manual. Effective cooperation for ITAM data collection is challenging.
    • ITAM tools are in place, but additional configuration or tooling is needed.
    Unreliable - Struggles to Support
    • No data, or data is typically unusable.
    • No allocated staff, no cooperation between parties responsible for ITAM data collection.
    • No related policies or documentation.
    • Tools are non-existent or not fit-for-purpose.

    Current and target ITAM maturity

    Today:
    Firefighter
    • Data is often untrustworthy, is fragmented across multiple repositories, and typically requires significant effort to translate or validate before use.
    • Insufficient staff, fragmented or incomplete policies or documentation.
    • Tools are non-existent.
    In One Year:
    Trusted Operator
    • ITAM data for deployed hardware and software is regularly audited for accuracy.
    • Sufficient staff and skills to support asset tracking, including a dedicated IT asset management role.
    • Teams responsible for ITAM data collection cooperate effectively.
    • Discovery, tracking, and analysis tools support most important use cases.
    IT maturity ladder with five color-coded levels.

    Innovator – Optimized Asset Management

    Business & Technology Partner – Proactive Asset Management

    Trusted Operator – Controls Assets

    Firefighter – Reactive Asset Tracking

    Unreliable - Struggles to Support

    Step 1.5: Write mission and vision statements

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers

    Outcomes

    • Write a mission statement that encapsulates the purpose and intentions of the ITAM practice today.
    • Write a vision statement that describes what the ITAM practice aspires to become and achieve.

    Write vision and mission statements

    Create two statements to summarize the role of the ITAM practice today – and where you want it to be in the future.

    Create two short, compelling statements that encapsulate:
    • The vision for what we want the ITAM practice to be in the future; and
    • The mission – the purpose and intentions – of the ITAM practice today.

    Why bother creating mission and vision statements? After all, isn’t it just rehashing or re-writing all the work we’ve just done? Isn’t that (at best) a waste of time?

    There are a few very important reasons to create mission and vision statements:

    • Create a compass that can guide work today and your roadmap for the future.
    • Focus on the few things you must do, rather than the many things you could do.
    • Concisely communicate a compelling vision for the ITAM practice to a larger audience who (let’s face it) probably won’t read the entire ITAM Strategy deck.

    “Brevity is the soul of wit.” (Hamlet, Act 2, Scene 2)

    “Writing is easy. All you have to do is cross out the wrong words.” (Mark Twain)

    1.5 Write an ITAM vision statement

    30 minutes

    Input: Organizational strategy documents

    Output: A list of prioritized organizational goals, An initial assessment of how ITAM can support these goals

    Materials: A whiteboard, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT Leaders and managers

    Your vision statement describes the ITAM practice as it will be in the far future. It is a target to aspire to, beyond your ability to achieve in the near or medium term.

    Examples of ITAM vision statements:

    Develop the single accurate view of IT assets, available to anyone who needs it.

    Indispensable data brokers that support strategic decisions on the IT environment.

    Provide sticky notes to participants. Write out the three questions below on a whiteboard side by side. Have participants write their answers to the questions and post them below the appropriate question. Give everyone 10 minutes to write and post their ideas.

    1. What’s the desired future state of the ITAM practice?
    2. What needs to be done to achieved this desired state?
    3. How do we want ITAM to be perceived in this desired state?

    Review the answers and combine them into one focused vision statement. Use the 20x20 rule: take no more than 20 minutes and use no more than 20 words. If you’re not finished after 20 minutes, the ITAM manager should make any final edits offline.

    Document your vision statement in your ITAM Strategy Template.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    1.5 Write an ITAM mission statement

    30 minutes

    Input: Organizational strategy documents

    Output: A list of prioritized organizational goals, An initial assessment of how ITAM can support these goals

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers

    Your ITAM mission statement is an expression of what your IT asset management function brings to your organization today. It should be presented in straightforward language that is compelling, easy to understand, and sharply focused.

    Examples of ITAM mission statements:

    Maintain accurate, actionable, accessible on data on all IT assets.

    Support IT and the business with centralized and integrated asset data.

    Provide sticky notes to participants. Write out the questions below on a whiteboard side by side. Have participants write their answers to the questions and post them below the appropriate question. Give everyone 10 minutes to write and post their ideas.

    1. What is our role as the asset management team?
    2. How do we support the IT and business strategies?
    3. What does our asset management function offer that no one else can?

    Review the answers and combine them into one focused vision statement. Use the 20x20 rule: take no more than 20 minutes and use no more than 20 words. If you’re not finished after 20 minutes, the ITAM manager should make any final edits offline.

    Document your vision statement in your ITAM Strategy Template.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Step 1.6: Define ITAM metrics and KPIs

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers

    Outcomes

    • Identify metrics, data, or reports that may be of interest to different consumers of ITAM data.
    • Identify the key performance indicators (KPIs) for the ITAM practice, based on the goals and priorities established earlier.

    Navigate a universe of ITAM metrics

    When you have the data, how will you use it?

    • There’s a dizzying array of potential metrics you can develop and track across your ITAM environment.
    • Different stakeholders will need different data feeds, metrics, reports, and dashboards.
    • Different measures will be useful at different times. You will often need to filter or slice the data in different ways (by department, timeframe, equipment type, etc.)
    • We’ll use the next few exercises to identify the types of metrics that may be useful to different stakeholders and the KPIs to measure progress towards ITAM goals and priorities.

    ITAM Metrics

    • Quantity
      e.g. # of devices or licenses
    • Cost
      e.g. average laptop cost
    • Compliance
      e.g. effective license position reports
    • Progress
      e.g. ITAM roadmap items completed
    • Quality
      e.g. ITAM data accuracy rate
    • Time
      e.g. time to procure/ deploy

    Drill down by:

    • Vendor
    • Date
    • Dept.
    • Product
    • Location
    • Cost Center

    Develop different metrics for different teams

    A few examples:

    • CIOs — CIOs need asset data to govern technology use, align to business needs, and demonstrate IT value. What do we need to budget for hardware and software in the next year? Where can we find money to support urgent new initiatives? How many devices and software titles do we manage compared to last year? How has IT helped the business achieve key goals?
    • Asset Managers — Asset managers require data to help them oversee ITAM processes, technology, and staff, and to manage the fleet of IT assets they’re expected to track. What’s the accuracy rate of ITAM data? What’s the state of integrations between ITAM and other systems and processes? How many renewals are coming up in the next 90 days? How many laptops are in stock?
    • IT Leaders — IT managers need data that can support their teams and help them manage the technology within their mandate. What technology needs to be reviewed or retired? What do we actually manage?
    • Technicians — Service desk technicians need real-time access to data on IT assets to support service requests and incident management – for example, easy access to the list of equipment assigned to a particular user or installed in a particular location.
    • Business Managers and Executives — Business managers and executives need concise, readable dashboards to support business decisions about business use of IT assets. What’s our overall asset spend? What’s our forecasted spend? Where could we reallocate spend?

    1.6 Identify useful ITAM metrics and reports

    60 minutes

    Input: Organizational strategy documents

    Output: A list of prioritized organizational goals, An initial assessment of how ITAM can support these goals

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers

    Use this exercise to identify as many potentially useful ITAM metrics and reports as possible, and narrow them down to a few high-priority metrics. Leverage the list of example metrics on the next slide for your own exercise. If you have more than six participants, consider splitting into two or more groups, and divide the table between groups to minimize overlap.

    1. List potential consumers of ITAM data in the column on the left.
    2. What type of information do we think this role needs? What questions about IT assets do we get on a regular basis from this role or team?
    3. Review and consolidate the list as a group. Discuss and highlight any metrics the group thinks are a particularly high priority for tracking.
    Role Compliance Quality Quantity Cost Time Progress
    IT Asset Manager Owned devices not discovered in last 60 days Discrepancies between discovery data and ITAM DB records # of corporate-owned devices Spend on hardware (recent and future/ planned) Average time, maximum time to deploy end-user devices Number of ITAM roadmap items in progress
    Service Desk

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Examples of ITAM metrics

    Compliance Quality Quantity Cost Time/Duration/Age Progress
    Owned devices not discovered in last 60 days Discrepancies between discovery data and ITAM DB records # of corporate-owned devices Spend on hardware (recent and future/planned) Average time, maximum time to deploy end-user devices Number of ITAM roadmap items in progress or completed
    Disposed devices without certificate of destruction Breakage rates (in and out of warranty) by vendor # of devices running software title X, # of licenses for software title X Spend on software (recent and future/planned) Average time, maximum time to deploy end user software Number of integrations between ITAM DB and other sources
    Discrepancies between licenses and install count, by software title RMAs by vendor, model, equipment type Number of requests by equipment model or software title Spend on cloud (recent and future/planned) Average & total time spent on software audit responses Number of records in ITAM database
    Compliance reports (e.g. tied to regulatory compliance or grant funding) Tickets by equipment type or software title Licenses issued from license pool in the last 30 days Value of licenses issued from license pool in the last 30 days (cost avoidance) Devices by age Software titles with an up-to-date ELP report
    Reports on lost and stolen devices, including last assigned, date reported stolen, actions taken User device satisfaction scores, CSAT scores Number of devices retired or donated in last year Number of IT-managed capital assets Number of hardware/software request tickets beyond time-to-fulfil targets Number of devices audited (by ITAM team via self-audit)
    Number of OS versions, unpatched systems Number of devices due for refresh in the next year Spend saved by harvesting unused software Number of software titles, software vendors managed by ITAM team
    Audit accuracy rate Equipment in stock Cost savings from negotiations
    # of users assigned more than one device Number of non-standard devices or requests Dollars charged during audit or true-up

    Differentiate between metrics and KPIs

    Key performance indicators (KPIs) are metrics with targets aligned to goals.

    Targets could include one or more of:

    • Target state (e.g. completed)
    • Target magnitude (e.g. number, percent, rate, dollar amount)
    • Target direction (e.g. trending up or down)

    You may track many metrics, but you should have only a few KPIs (typically 2-3 per objective).

    A breached KPI should be a trigger to investigate and remediate the root cause of the problem, to ensure progress towards goals and priorities can continue.

    Which KPIs you track will change over the life of the practice, as ITAM goals and priorities shift. For example, KPIs may initially track progress towards maturing ITAM practices. Once you’ve reached target maturity, KPIs may shift to track whether the key service targets are being met.

    1.6 Identify ITAM KPIs

    20 minutes

    Input: Organizational strategy documents

    Output: A list of prioritized organizational goals, An initial assessment of how ITAM can support these goals

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers

    Good KPIs are a more objective measure of whether you’re succeeding in meeting the identified priorities for the ITAM practice.

    Identify metrics that can measure progress or success against the priorities and goals set earlier. Aim for around three metrics per goal. Identify targets for the metric you think are SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and timebound). Track your work using the example table below.

    Goal Metric Target
    Consolidate major software contracts to drive discounts Amount spent on top 10 software contracts Decrease by 10% by next year
    Customer satisfaction scores with enterprise software Satisfaction is equal to or better than last year
    Value of licenses issued from license pool 30% greater than last year
    Identify abandoned or out-of-spec IT assets # of security incidents involving undiscovered assets Zero
    % devices with “Deployed” status in ITAM DB but not discovered for 30+ days ‹1% of all records in ITAM DB
    Provide IT asset data to technicians for service calls Customer satisfaction scores Satisfaction is equal to or better than last year
    % of end-user devices meeting minimum standards 97%

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Develop an IT Asset Management Strategy

    Phase 2:

    Identify your approach to support ITAM priorities and goals

    Phase 1

    1.1 Define ITAM and brainstorm opportunities and challenges.

    Executive Alignment Working Session:

    1.2 Review organizational priorities, strategy, and key initiatives.

    1.3 Align executive priorities with ITAM opportunities & priorities.

    1.4 Identify business-aligned ITAM goals and target maturity.

    1.5 Write mission and vision statements.

    1.6 Define ITAM metrics and KPIs.

    Phase 2

    2.1 Define ITAM scope.

    2.2 Acquire ITAM services (outsourcing and contracting).

    2.3 Centralize or decentralize ITAM capabilities.

    2.4 Create a RACI for the ITAM practice.

    2.5 Align ITAM with other service management practices.

    2.6 Evaluate ITAM tools and integrations.

    2.7 Create a plan for internal and external audits.

    2.8 Improve your budget processes.

    2.9 Establish a documentation framework.

    2.10 Create a roadmap and communication plan.

    Phase Outcomes:

    Establish an approach to achieving ITAM goals and priorities, including scope, structure, tools, service management integrations, documentation, and more.

    Create a roadmap that enables you to realize your approach.

    Step 2.1: Define ITAM Scope

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers
    • ITAM business partners

    Outcomes

    • Establish what types of equipment and software you’ll track through the ITAM practice.
    • Establish which areas of the business will be in scope of the ITAM practice.

    Determine ITAM Scope

    Focus on what’s most important and then document it so everyone understands where they can provide the most value.

    Not all categories of assets require the same level of tracking, and some equipment and software should be excluded from the ITAM practice entirely.

    In some organizations, portions of the environment won’t be tracked by the asset management team at all. For example, some organizations will choose to delegate tracking multi-function printers (MFPs) or proprietary IoT devices to the department or vendor that manages them.

    Due to resourcing or technical limitations, you may decide that certain equipment or software is out of scope for the moment.

    What do other organizations typically track in detail?
    • Installs and entitlements for major software contracts that represent significant spend and/or are highly critical to business goals.
    • Equipment managed directly by IT that needs to be refreshed on a regular cycle:
      • End-user devices such as laptops, desktops, and tablets.
      • Server, network, and telecoms devices.
    • High value equipment that is not regularly refreshed may also be tracked, but in less detail – for example, you may not refresh large screen TVs, but you may need to track date of purchase, deployed location, vendor, and model for insurance or warranty purposes.

    2.1 Establish scope for ITAM

    45 minutes

    Input: Organizational strategy documents

    Output: ITAM scope, in terms of types of assets tracked and not tracked

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers, ITAM business partners

    Establish the hardware and software that are within the scope of the ITAM program by updating the tables below to reflect your own environment. The “out of scope” category will include asset types that may be of value to track in the future but for which the capability or need don’t exist today.

    Hardware Software Out of Scope
    • End-user devices housing data or with a dollar value of more than $300, which will be replaced through lifecycle refresh.
    • Infrastructure devices, including network, telecom, video conferencing, servers and more
    • End-user software purchased under contract
    • Best efforts on single license purchases
    • Infrastructure software, including solutions used by IT to manage the infrastructure
    • Enterprise applications
    • Cloud (SaaS, IaaS, PaaS)
    • Departmental applications
    • Open-source applications
    • In-house developed applications
    • Freeware & shareware
    • IoT devices

    The following locations will be included in the ITAM program: All North and South America offices and retail locations.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Step 2.2: Acquire ITAM Services

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers
    • ITAM business partners

    Outcomes

    • Define the type of work that may be more effectively or efficiently delivered by an outsourcer or contractor.

    “We would like our clients to come to us with an idea of where they want to get to. Why are you doing this? Is it for savings? Because you want to manage your security attack surface? Are there digital initiatives you want to move forward? What is the end goal?” (Mike Austin, MetrixData 360)

    Effectively acquire ITAM services

    Allow your team to focus on strategic, value-add activities by acquiring services that free them from commodity tasks.
    • When determining which asset capabilities and activities are best kept in-house and which ones are better handled by a supplier, it is imperative to keep the value to the business in mind.
    • Activities/capabilities that are challenging to standardize and are critical to enabling business goals are better kept in-house.
    • Activities/capabilities that are (or should be) standardized and automated are ideal candidates for outsourcing.
    • Outsourcing can be effective and successful with a narrow scope of engagement and an alignment to business outcomes.
    • Organizations that heavily weigh cost reduction as a significant driver for outsourcing are far less likely to realize the value they expected to receive.
    Business Enablement
    • Supports business-aligned ITAM opportunities & priorities
    • Highly specialized
    • Offers competitive advantages
    Map with axes 'Business Enablement' and 'Vendor's Performance Advantage' for determining whether or not to outsource.
    Vendor’s Performance Advantage
    • Talent or access to skills
    • Economies of scale
    • Access to technology
    • Does not require deep knowledge of your business

    Decide what to outsource

    It’s rarely all or nothing.

    Ask yourself:
    • How important is this activity or capability to ITAM, IT, and business priorities and goals?
    • Is it a non-commodity IT service that can improve customer satisfaction?
    • Is it a critical service to the business and the specialized knowledge must remain in-house?
    • Does the function require access to talent or skills not currently available in-house, and is cost-prohibitive to obtain?
    • Are there economies of scale that can help us meet growing demand?
    • Does the vendor provide access to best-of-breed tools and solutions that can handle the integration, management, maintenance and support of the complete system?

    You may ultimately choose to engage a single vendor or a combination of multiple vendors who can best meet your ITAM needs.

    Establishing effective vendor management processes, where you can maximize the amount of service you receive while relying on the vendor’s expertise and ability to scale, can help you make your asset management practice a net cost-saver.

    ITAM activities and capabilities
    • Contract review
    • Software audit management
    • Asset tagging
    • Asset disposal and recycling
    • Initial ITAM record creation
    • End-user device imaging
    • End-user device deployment
    • End-user software provisioning
    • End-user image management
    • ITAM database administration
    • ELP report creation
    • ITAM process management
    • ITAM report generation
    ITAM-adjacent activities and capabilities
    • Tier 1 support/service desk
    • Deskside/field support
    • Tier 3 support
    • IT Procurement
    • Device management/managed IT services
    • Budget development
    • Applications development, maintenance
    • Infrastructure hosting (e.g. cloud or colocation)
    • Infrastructure management and support
    • Discovery/monitoring tools management and support

    2.2 Identify outsourcing opportunities

    1-2 hours

    Input: Understanding of current ITAM processes and challenges

    Output: Understanding of potential outsourcing opportunities

    Materials: The table in this slide, and insight in previous slides, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers, ITAM business partners

    At a high level, discuss which functions of ITAM are good candidates for outsourcing.

    Start with the previous slide for examples of outsourcing activities or capabilities directly related to or adjacent to the ITAM practice. Categorize these activities as follows:

    Outsource Potentially Outsource Insource
    • Asset disposal/recycling
    • ELP report creation
    • ITAM process management

    Go through the list of activities to potentially or definitely outsource and confirm:

    1. Will outsourcing solve a resourcing need for an existing process, or can you deliver this adequately in-house?
    2. Will outsourcing improve the effectiveness and efficiency of current processes? Will it deliver more effective service channels or improved levels of reliability and performance consistency?
    3. Will outsourcing provide or enable enhanced service capabilities that your IT customers could use, and which you cannot deliver in-house due to lack of scale or capacity?

    Answering “no” to more than one of these questions suggests a need to further review options to ensure the goals are aligned with the potential value of the service offerings available.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Step 2.3: Centralize or decentralize ITAM capabilities

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers
    • ITAM business partners

    Outcomes

    • Outline where the team(s) responsible for ITAM sit across the organization, who they report to, and who they need to work with across IT and the business.

    Align ITAM with IT’s structure

    ITAM’s structure will typically align with the larger business and IT structure. The wrong structure will undermine your ability to meet ITAM goals and lead to frustration, missed work, inefficiency, and loss of value.

    Which of the four archetypes below reflects the structure you need?

    1. Centralized — ITAM is entirely centralized in a single function, which reports into a central IT department.
    2. Decentralized — Local IT groups are responsible and accountable for ITAM. They may coordinate informally but do not report to any central team.
    3. Hybrid-Shared Services — Local IT can opt in to shared services but must follow centrally set ITAM practices to do so, usually with support from a shared ITAM function.
    4. Hybrid-Federated — Local IT departments are free to develop their own approach to ITAM outside of core, centrally set requirements.

    Centralized ITAM

    Total coordination, control, and oversight

    • ITAM accountability, policies, tools, standards, and expertise – in this model, they’re all concentrated in a single, specialized IT asset management practice. Accountability, authority, and oversight are concentrated in the central function as well.
    • A central ITAM team will benefit from knowledge sharing and task specialization opportunities. They are a visible single point of contact for ITAM-related questions
    • The central ITAM team will coordinate ITAM activities across the organization to optimize spend, manage risk, and enhance service. Any local IT teams are supported by and directly answerable to the central ITAM team for ITAM activities.
    • There is a single, centrally managed ITAM database. Wherever possible, this database should be integrated with other tools to support cross-solution automation (e.g. integrate AD to automatically reflect user identity changes in the ITAM database).
    • This model drives cross-organization coordination and oversight, but it may not be responsive to specific and nuanced local requirements.
    Example: Centralized
    Example of a Centralized ITAM.

    Solid line. Direct reporting relationship

    Dotted line. Dotted line working or reporting relationship

    Decentralized ITAM

    Maximize choice

    • ITAM accountability and oversight are entirely devolved to local or regional IT and/or ITAM organizations, which are free to set their own priorities, goals, policies, and standards. This model maximizes the authority of local groups to build practices that meet local requirements.
    • It may be challenging to resource and mature local practices. ITAM maturity will vary from one local organization to the next.
    • It is more likely that ITAM managers are a part-time role, and sometimes even a non-IT role. Local ITAM teams or coordinators may coordinate and share knowledge informally, but specialization can be challenging to build or leverage effectively across the organization.
    • There is likely no central ITAM tool. Local tools may be acquired, implemented, and integrated by local IT departments to suit their own needs, which can make it very difficult to report on assets organization-wide – for example, to establish compliance on an enterprise software contract.
    Example: Decentralized


    Example of a Decentralized ITAM.

    Solid line. Direct reporting relationship

    Dotted line. Dotted line working or reporting relationship

    Blue dotted line. Informal working relationships, knowledge sharing

    Hybrid: Federation

    Centralization with a light touch

    • A middle ground between centralized and decentralized ITAM, this model balances centralized decision making, specialization, and governance with local autonomy.
    • A central team will define organization-wide ITAM goals, develop capabilities, policies, and standards, and monitor compliance by local and central teams. All local teams must comply with centrally defined requirements, but they can also develop further capabilities to meet local goals.
    • For example, there will typically be a central ITAM database that must be used for at least a subset of assets, but other teams may build their own databases for day-to-day operations and export data to the central database as required.
    • There are often overlapping responsibilities in this model. A strong collaborative relationship between central and local ITAM teams is especially important here, particularly after major changes to requirements, processes, tools, or staffing when issues and breakdowns are more likely.
    Example: Federation


    Example of a Federation ITAM.

    Solid line. Direct reporting relationship

    Purple solid line. Oversight/governance

    Dotted line. Dotted line working or reporting relationship

    Hybrid: Shared Services

    Optional centralization

    • A special case of federated ITAM that balances central control and local autonomy, but with more power given to local IT to opt out of centralized shared services that come with centralized ITAM requirements.
    • ITAM requirements set by the shared services team will support management, allocation, and may have showback or chargeback implications. Following the ITAM requirements is a condition of service. If a local organization chooses to stop using shared services, they are (naturally) no longer required to adhere to the shared services ITAM requirements.
    • As with the federated model, local teams may develop further capabilities to meet local goals.
    Example: Shared Services


    Example of a Shared Services ITAM.

    Solid line. Direct reporting relationship

    Dotted line. Dotted line working relationship

    Blue dotted line. Informal working relationships, knowledge sharing

    Structure data collection & analysis

    Consider the implications of structure on data.

    Why centralize?
    • There is a need to build reports that aggregate data on assets organization-wide, rather than just assets within a local environment.
    • Decentralized ITAM tracking isn’t producing accurate or usable data, even for local purposes.
    • Tracking tools have overlapping functionality. There’s an opportunity to rationalize spend, management and support for ITAM tools.
    • Contract centralization can optimize spend and manage risks, but only with the data required to manage those contracts.
    Why decentralize?
    • Tracking and reporting on local assets is sufficient to meet ITAM goals; there is limited or no need to track assets organization-wide.
    • Local teams have the skills to track and maintain asset data; subsidiaries have appropriate budgets and tools to support ITAM tracking.
    • Decentralized ITSM/ITAM tools are in place, populated, and accurate.
    • The effort to consolidate tools and processes may outweigh the benefits to data centralization.
    • Lots of variability in types of assets and the environment is stable.
    Requirements for success:
    • A centralized IT asset management solution is implemented and managed.
    • Local teams must understand the why and how of centralized data tracking and be held accountable for assigned responsibilities.
    • The asset tool should offer both centralized and localized views of the data.
    Requirements for success:
    • Guidelines and expectations for reporting to centralized asset management team will be well defined and supported.
    • Local asset managers will have opportunity to collaborate with others in the role for knowledge transfer and asset trading, where appropriate.

    Structure budget and contract management

    Contract consolidation creates economies of scale for vendor management and license pooling that strengthen your negotiating position with vendors and optimize spend.

    Why centralize?
    • Budgeting, governance, and accountability are already centralized. Centralized ITAM practices can support the existing governance practices.
    • Centralizing contract management and negotiation can optimize spend and/or deliver access to better service.
    • Centralize management for contracts that cover most of the organization, are highly complex, involve large spend and/or higher risk, and will benefit from specialization of asset staff.
    Why decentralize?
    • Budgeting, governance, and accountability rest with local organizations.
    • There may be increased need for high levels of customer responsiveness and support.
    • Decentralize contract management for contracts used only by local groups (e.g. a few divisions, a few specialized functions), and that are smaller, low risk, and come with standard terms and conditions.
    Requirements for success:
    • A centralized IT asset management solution is implemented and managed.
    • Contract terms must be harmonized across the organization.
    • Centralized fulfillment is as streamlined as possible. For example, software contracts should include the right to install at any time and pay through a true-up process.
    Requirements for success:
    • Any expectations for harmonization with the centralized asset management team will be well defined and supported.
    • Local asset managers can collaborate with other local ITAM leads to support knowledge transfer, asset swapping, etc.

    Structure technology management

    Are there opportunities to centralize or decentralize support functions?

    Why centralize?
    • Standard technologies are deployed organization-wide.
    • There are opportunities to improve service and optimize costs by consolidating knowledge, service contracts, and support functions.
    • Centralizing data on product supply allows for easier harvest and redeployment of assets by a central support team.
    • A stable, central support function can better support localized needs during seasonal staffing changes, mergers and acquisitions.
    Why decentralize?
    • Technology is unique to a local subset of users or customers.
    • Minimal opportunity for savings or better support by consolidating knowledge, service contracts, or support functions.
    • Refresh standards are set at a local level; new tech adoption may be impeded by a reliance on older technologies, local budget shortfalls, or other constraints.
    • Hardware may need to be managed locally if shipping costs and times can’t reasonably be met by a distant central support team.
    Requirements for success:
    • Ensure required processes, technologies, skills, and knowledge are in place to enable centralized support.
    • Keep a central calendar of contract renewals, including reminders to start work on the renewal no less than 90 days prior. Prioritize contracts with high dollar value or high risk.
    • The central asset management solution should be configured to provide data that can enable the central support team.
    Requirements for success:
    • Ensure required processes, technologies, skills, and knowledge are in place to enable decentralized support.
    • Decentralized support teams must understand and adhere to ITAM activities that are part of support work (e.g. data entry, data audits).
    • The central asset management solution should be configured to provide data that can enable the central support team, or decentralized asset solutions must be funded, and teams trained on their use.

    2.3 Review ITAM Structure

    1-2 hours

    Input: Understanding of current organizational structure, Understanding of challenges and opportunities related to the current structure

    Output: A list of prioritized organizational goals, An initial assessment of how ITAM can support these goals

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers, ITAM business partners

    Outline the current model for your organization and identify opportunities to centralize or decentralize ITAM-related activities.

    1. What model best describes how ITAM should be structured in your organization? Modify the slide outlining structure as a group to outline your own organization, as required.
    2. In the table below, outline opportunities to centralize or decentralize data tracking, budget and contract management, and technology management activities.
    Centralize Decentralize
    Data collection & analysis
    • Make better use of central ITAM database.
    • Support local IT departments building runbooks for data tracking during lifecycle activities (create templates, examples)
    Budget and contract management
    • Centralize Microsoft contracts.
    • Create a runbook to onboard new companies to MSFT contracts.
    • Create tools and data views to support local department budget exercises.
    Technology management
    • Ensure all end-user devices are visible to centrally managed InTune, ConfigMgr.
    • Enable direct shipping from vendor to local sites.
    • Establish disposal/pickup at local sites.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Step 2.4: Create a RACI

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers
    • ITAM business partners

    Outcomes

    • Review the role of the IT asset manager.
    • Identify who’s responsible, accountable, consulted, and informed for key ITAM activities.

    Empower your asset manager

    The asset manager is the critical ITAM role. Ensure they’re positioned to succeed.

    There’s too much change in the technology and business environment to expect ITAM to be “a problem to solve.” It is a practice that requires care and feeding through regular iteration to achieve success. At the helm of this practice is your asset manager, whose approach and past experience will have a significant impact on how you approach ITAM.

    The asset manager role requires a variety of skills, knowledge, and abilities including:

    • Operations, process, and practice management.
    • An ability to communicate, influence, negotiate, and facilitate.
    • Organizational knowledge and relationship management.
    • Contract and license agreement analysis, attention to detail.
    • Natural curiosity and a willingness to learn.
    • A strong understanding of technologies in use by the organization, and how they fit into the asset management program.
    Where the asset manager sits in the organization will also have an impact on their focus and priorities. When the asset manager reports into a service team, their focus will often reflect their team’s focus: end-user devices and software, customer satisfaction, request fulfillment. Asset teams that report into a leadership or governance function will be more likely to focus on organization-wide assets, governance, budget management, and compliance.

    “Where your asset manager sits, and what past experience they have, is going to influence how they do asset management.” (Jeremy Boerger, Consultant & Author)

    “It can be annoying at times, but a good IT asset manager will poke their nose into activities that do not obviously concern them, such as programme and project approval boards and technical design committees. Their aim is to identify and mitigate ITAM risks BEFORE the technology is deployed as well as to ensure that projects and solutions ‘bake in’ the necessary processes and tools that ensure IT assets can be managed effectively throughout their lifecycle.” (Kylie Fowler, ITAM by Design, 2017)

    IT asset managers must have a range of skills and knowledge

    • ITAM Operations, Process, and Practice Management
      The asset manager is typically responsible for managing and improving the ITAM practice and related processes and tools. The asset manager may administer the ITAM tool, develop reports and dashboards, evaluate and implement new technologies or services to improve ITAM maturity, and more.
    • Organizational Knowledge
      An effective IT asset manager has a good understanding of your organization and its strategy, products, stakeholders, and culture.
    • Technology & Product Awareness
      An IT asset manager must learn about new and changing technologies and products adopted by the organization (e.g. IoT, cloud) and develop recommendations on how to track and manage them via the ITAM practice.
    A book surrounded by icons corresponding to the bullet points.
    • People Management
      Asset managers often manage a team directly and have dotted-line reports across IT and the business.
    • Communication
      Important in any role, but particularly critical where learning, listening, negotiation, and persuasion are so critical.
    • Finance & Budgeting
      A foundational knowledge of financial planning and budgeting practices is often helpful, where the asset manager is asked to contribute to these activities.
    • Contract Review & Analysis
      Analyze new and existing contracts to evaluate changes, identify compliance requirements, and optimize spend.

    Assign ITAM responsibilities and accountabilities

    Align authority and accountability.
    • A RACI exercise will help you discuss and document accountability and responsibility for critical ITAM activities.
    • When responsibility and accountability are not currently well documented, it’s often useful to invite a representative of the roles identified to participate in this alignment exercise. The discussion can uncover contrasting views on responsibility and governance, which can help you build a stronger management and governance model.
    • The RACI chart can help you identify who should be involved when making changes to a given activity. Clarify the variety of responsibilities assigned to each key role.
    • In the future, you may need to define roles in more detail as you change your hardware and software asset management procedures.

    R

    Responsible: The person who actually gets the job done.

    Different roles may be responsible for different aspects of the activity relevant to their role.

    A

    Accountable: The one role accountable for the activity (in terms completion, quality, cost, etc.)

    Must have sufficient authority to be held accountable; responsible roles are often accountable to this role.

    C

    Consulted: Must have the opportunity to provide meaningful input at certain points in the activity.

    Typically, subject matter experts or stakeholders. The more people you must consult, the more overhead and time you’ll add to a process.

    I

    Informed: Receives information regarding the task, but has no requirement to provide feedback.

    Information might relate to process execution, changes, or quality.

    2.4 Conduct a RACI Exercise

    1-2 hours

    Input: An understanding of key roles and activities in ITAM practices, An understanding of your organization, High-level structure of your ITAM program

    Output: A RACI diagram for IT asset management

    Materials: The table in the next slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers, ITAM business partners

    Let’s face it – RACI exercises can be dry. We’ve found that the approach below is more collaborative, engaging, and effective compared to filling out the table as a large group.

    1. Create a shared working copy of the RACI charts on the following slides (e.g. write it out on a whiteboard or provide a link to this document and work directly in it).
    2. Review the list of template roles and activities as a group. Add, change, or remove roles and activities from the table as needed.
    3. Divide into small groups. Assign each group a set of roles, and have them define whether that role is accountable, responsible, consulted, or informed for each activity in the chart. Refer to the previous slide for context on RACI. Give everyone 15 minutes to update their section of the chart.
    4. Come back together as a large group to review the chart. First, check for accountability – there should generally be just one role accountable for each activity. Then, have each small group walk through their section, and encourage participants to ask questions. Is there at least one role responsible for each task, and what are they responsible for? Does everyone listed as consulted or informed really need to be? Make any necessary adjustments.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Define ITAM governance activities

    RACI Chart for ITAM governance activities. In the first column is a list of governance activities, and the row headers are positions within a company. Fields are marked with an R, A, C, or I.

    Document asset management responsibilities and accountabilities

    RACI Chart for ITAM asset management responsibilities and accountabilities. In the first column is a list of responsibilities and accountabilities, and the row headers are positions within a company. Fields are marked with an R, A, C, or I.

    Step 2.5: Align ITAM with other Service Management Practices

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers

    Outcomes

    • Establish shared and separate responsibilities for asset and configuration management.
    • Identify how ITAM can support other practices, and how other practices can support ITAM.

    Asset vs. Configuration

    Asset and configuration management look at the same world through different lenses.
    • IT asset management tends to focus on each IT asset in its own right: assignment or ownership, its lifecycle, and related financial obligations and entitlements.
    • Configuration management is focused on configuration items (CIs) that must be managed to deliver a service and the relationships and integrations to other CIs.
    • ITAM and configuration management teams and practices should work closely together. Though asset and configuration management focus on different outcomes, they tend use overlapping tools and data sets. Each practice, when working effectively, can strengthen the other.
    • Many objects will exist in both the CMDB and AMDB, and the data on those shared objects will need to be kept in sync.
    Asset and Configuration Management: An Example

    Configuration Management Database (CMDB)

    A database of uniquely identified configuration items (CIs). Each CI record may include information on:
    Service Attributes

    Supported Service(s)
    Service Description, Criticality, SLAs
    Service Owners
    Data Criticality/Sensitivity

    CI Relationships

    Physical Connections
    Logical Connections
    Dependencies

    Arrow connector.

    Discovery, Normalization, Dependency Mapping, Business Rules*

    Manual Data Entry

    Arrow connector.
    This shared information could be attached to asset records, CI records, or both, and it should be synchronized between the two databases where it’s tracked in both.
    Hardware Information

    Serial, Model and Specs
    Network Address
    Physical Location

    Software Installations

    Hypervisor & OS
    Middleware & Software
    Software Configurations

    Arrow connector.

    Asset Management Database (AMDB)

    A database of uniquely identified IT assets. Each asset record may include information on:
    Procurement/Purchasing

    Purchase Request/Purchase Order
    Invoice and Cost
    Cost Center
    Vendor
    Contracts and MSAs
    Support/Maintenance/Warranties

    Asset Attributes

    Model, Title, Product Info, License Key
    Assigned User
    Lifecycle Status
    Last ITAM Audit Date
    Certificate of Disposal

    Arrows connecting multiple fields.

    IT Security Systems

    Vulnerability Management
    Threat Management
    SIEM
    Endpoint Protection

    IT Service Management (ITSM) System

    Change Tickets
    Request Tickets
    Incident Tickets
    Problem Tickets
    Project Tickets
    Knowledgebase

    Financial System/ERP

    General Ledger
    Accounts Payable
    Accounts Receivable
    Enterprise Assets
    Enterprise Contract Database

    (*Discovery, dependency mapping, and data normalization are often features or modules of configuration management, asset management, or IT service management tools.)

    2.5 Integrate ITAM and configuration practices

    45 minutes

    Input: Knowledge of the organization’s configuration management processes

    Output: Define how ITAM and configuration management will support one another

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers, Configuration manager

    Work through the table below to identify how you will collaborate and synchronize data across ITAM and configuration management practices and tools.

    What are the goals (if any currently exist) for the configuration management practice? Connect configuration items to services to support service management.
    How will configuration and asset management teams collaborate? Weekly status updates. As-needed working sessions.
    Shared visibility on each others’ Kanban tracker.
    Create tickets to raise and track issues that require collaboration or attention from the other team.
    How can config leverage ITAM? Connect CIs to financial, contractual, and ownership data.
    How can ITAM leverage config? Connect assets to services, changes, incidents.
    What key fields will be primarily tracked/managed by ITAM? Serial number, unique ID, user, location, PO number, …
    What key fields will be primarily tracked/managed by configuration management? Supported service(s), dependencies, service description, service criticality, network address…

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    ITAM supports service management

    Decoupling asset management from other service management practices can result in lost value. Establish how asset management can support other service management practices – and how those practices can support ITAM.

    Incident Management

    What broke?
    Was it under warranty?
    Is there a service contract?
    Was it licensed?
    Who was it assigned to?
    Is it end-of-life?

    ITAM
    Practice

    Request Management

    What can this user request or purchase?
    What are standard hardware and software offerings?
    What does the requester already have?
    Are there items in inventory to fulfil the request?
    Did we save money by reissuing equipment?
    Is this a standard request?
    What assets are being requested regularly?

    What IT assets are related to the known issue?
    What models and vendors are related to the issue?
    Are the assets covered by a service contract?
    Are other tickets related to this asset?
    What end-of-life assets have been tied to incidents recently?

    Problem Management

    What assets are related to the change?
    Is the software properly licensed?
    Has old equipment been properly retired and disposed?
    Have software licenses been returned to the pool?
    Is the vendor support on the change part of a service contract?

    Change Enablement

    2.5. Connect with other IT service practices

    45 minutes

    Input: Knowledge of existing organizational IT service management processes

    Output: Define how ITAM will help other service management processes, and how other service management processes will help ITAM

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers, Service leads

    Complete the table below to establish what ITAM can provide to other service management practices, and what other practices can provide to ITAM.

    Practice ITAM will help Will help ITAM
    Incident Management Provide context on assets involved in an incident (e.g. ownership, service contracts). Track when assets are involved in incidents (via incident tickets).
    Request Management Oversee request & procurement processes. Help develop asset standards. Enter new assets in ITAM database.
    Problem Management Collect information on assets related to known issues. Report back on models/titles that are generating known issues.
    Change Enablement Provide context on assets for change review. Ensure EOL assets are retired and licenses are returned during changes.
    Capacity Management Identify ownership, location for assets at capacity. Identify upcoming refreshes or purchases.
    Availability Management Connect uptime and reliability to assets. Identify assets that are causing availability issues.
    Monitoring and Event Management Provide context to events with asset data. Notify asset of unrecognized software and hardware.
    Financial Management Establish current and predict future spending. Identify upcoming purchases, renewals.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Step 2.6: Evaluate ITAM tools and integrations

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers

    Outcomes

    • Create a list of the ITAM tools currently in use, how they’re used, and their current limitations.
    • Identify new tools that could provide value to the ITAM practice, and what needs to be done to acquire and implement them.

    “Everything is connected. Nothing is also connected.” (Dirk Gently’s Holistic Detective Agency)

    Establish current strengths and gaps in your ITAM toolset

    ITAM data quality relies on tools and integrations that are managed by individuals or teams who don’t report directly to the ITAM function.

    Without direct line of sight into tools management, the ITAM team must influence rather than direct improvement initiatives that are in some cases critical to the performance of the ITAM function. To more effectively influence improvement efforts, you must explicitly identify what you need, why you need it, from which tools, and from which stakeholders.

    Data Sources
    Procurement Tools
    Discovery Tools
    Active Directory
    Purchase Documents
    Spreadsheets
    Input To Asset System(s) of Record
    ITAM Database
    ITSM Tool
    CMDB
    Output To Asset Data Consumption
    ITFM Tools
    Security Tools
    TEM Tools
    Accounting Tools
    Spreadsheets
    “Active Directory plays a huge role in audit defense and self-assessment, but no-one really goes out there and looks at Active Directory.

    I was talking to one organization that has 1,600,000 AD records for 100,000 employees.” (Mike Austin, Founder, MetrixData 360)

    2.6 Evaluate ITAM existing technologies

    30 minutes

    Input: Knowledge of existing ITAM tools

    Output: A list of prioritized organizational goals, An initial assessment of how ITAM can support these goals

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers

    Identify the use, limitations, and next steps for existing ITAM tools, including those not directly managed by the ITAM team.

    1. What tools do we have today?
    2. What are they used for? What are their limitations?
    3. Who manages them?
    4. What actions could we take to maximize the value of the tools?
    Existing Tool Use Constraints Owner Proposed Action?
    ITAM Module
    • Track HW/SW
    • Connect assets to incident, request
    • Currently used for end-user devices only
    • Not all divisions have access
    • SAM capabilities are limited
    ITAM Team/Service Management
    • Add license for additional read/write access
    • Start tracking infra in this tool
    Active Directory
    • Store user IDs, organizational data
    Major data quality issues IT Operations
    • Work with AD team to identify issues creating data issues

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    2.6 Identify potential new tools

    30 minutes

    Input: Knowledge of tooling gaps, An understanding of available tools that could remediate gaps

    Output: New tools that can improve ITAM capabilities, including expected value and proposed next steps

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers

    Identify tools that are required to support the identified goals of the ITAM practice.

    1. What types of tools do we need that we don’t have?
    2. What could these tools help us do?
    3. What needs to be done next to investigate or acquire the appropriate tool?
    New Tool Expected Value Proposed Next Steps
    SAM tool
    • Automatically calculate licensing entitlements from contract data.
    • Automatically calculate licensing requirements from discovery data.
    • Support gap analyses.
    • Further develop software requirements.
    • Identify vendors in the space and create a shortlist.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Step 2.7: Create a plan for internal and external audits

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers
    • ITAM business partners

    Outcomes

    • Establish your approach to internal data audits.
    • Create a high-level response plan for external audits.

    Validate ITAM data via internal audits

    Data audits provide assurance that the records in the ITAM database are as accurate as possible. Consider these three approaches:

    Compare Tool Records

    Audit your data by comparing records in the ITAM system to other discovery sources.

    • Ideally, use three separate data sources (e.g. ITAM database, discovery tool, security tool). Use a common field, such as the host name, to compare across fields. (To learn more about discovery tool analysis, see Jeremy Boerger’s book, Rethinking IT Asset Management.)
    • Run reports to compare records and identify discrepancies. This could include assets missing from one system or metadata differences such as different users or installed software.
    • Over time, discrepancies between tools should be well understood and accepted; otherwise, they should be addressed and remediated.
    IT-led Audit

    Conduct a hands-on investigation led by ITAM staff and IT technicians.

    • In-person audits require significant effort and resources. Each audit should be scoped and planned ahead of time to focus on known problem areas.
    • Provide the audit team with exact instructions on what needs to be verified and recorded. Depending on the experience and attention to detail of the audit team, you may need to conduct spot checks to ensure you’re catching any issues in the audit process itself.
    • Automation should be used wherever possible (e.g. through barcodes, scanners, and tables for quick access to ITAM records).
    User-led audit

    Have users validate the IT assets assigned to them.

    • Even more than IT-led audits: don’t use this approach too frequently; keep the scope as narrow as possible and the process as simple as possible.
    • Ensure users have all the information and tools they’ll need readily available to complete this task, or the result will be ineffective and will only frustrate your users.
    • Consider a process integrated with your ITSM tool: once a year, when a user logs in to the portal, they will be asked to enter the asset code for their laptop (and provided with instructions on where to find that code). Investigate discrepancies between assignments and ITAM records.

    2.7 Set an approach to internal data audits

    30 minutes

    Input: An understanding of current data audit capabilities and needs

    Output: An outline of how you’ll approach data audits, including frequency, scope, required resources

    Materials: Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team

    Review the three internal data audit approaches outlined on the previous slide, and identify which of the three approaches you’ll use. For each approach, complete the fields in the table below.

    Audit Approach How often? What scope? Who’s involved? Comments
    Compare tool records Monthly Compare ITAM DB, Intune/ConfigMgr, and Vulnerability Scanner Data; focus on end-user devices to start Asset manager will lead at first.
    Work with tool admins to pull data and generate reports.
    IT-led audit Annual End-user devices at a subset of locations Asset manager will work with ITSM admins to generate reports. In-person audit to be conducted by local techs.
    User-led audit Annual Assigned personal devices (start with a pilot group) Asset coordinator to develop procedure with ITSM admin. Run pilot with power users first.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Prepare for and respond to external audits and true-ups

    Are you ready when software vendors come knocking?

    • Vendor audits are expensive.
    • If you’re out of compliance, you will at minimum be required to pay the missing license fees. At their discretion, vendors may choose to add punitive fees and require you to cover the hourly cost of their audit teams. If you choose not to pay, the vendor could secure an injunction to cut off your service, which in many cases will be far more costly than the fines. And this is aside from the intangible costs of the disruption to your business and damaged relationships between IT, ITAM, your business, and other partners.
    • Having a plan to respond to an audit is critical to reducing audit risk. Preparation will help you coordinate your audit response, ensure the audit happens on the most favorable possible terms, and even prevent some audits from happening in the first place.
    • The best defense, as they say, is a good offense. Good ITAM and SAM processes will allow you to track acquisition, allocation, and disposal of software licenses; understand your licensing position; and ensure you remain compliant whenever possible. The vendor has no reason to audit you when there’s nothing to find.
    • Know when and where your audit risk is greatest, so you can focus your resources where they can deliver the most value.
    “If software audits are a big part of your asset operations, you have problems. You can reduce the time spent on audits and eliminate some audits by having a proactive ITAM practice.” (Sandi Conrad, Principal Research Director)

    Info-Tech Insight

    Audit defense starts long before you get audited. For an in-depth review of your audit approach, see Info-Tech’s Prepare and Defend Against a Software Audit.

    Identify areas of higher audit risk

    Watch for these warning signs
    • Your organization is visibly fighting fires. Signs of disorder may signal to vendors that there are opportunities to exploit via an audit. Past audit failures make future audits more likely.
    • You are looking for ways to decrease spend. Vendors may counter attempts to true-down licensing by launching an audit to try to find unlicensed software that provides them leverage to negotiate maintained or even increased spending.
    • Your license/contract terms with the vendor are particularly complex or highly customized. Very complex terms may make it harder to validate your own compliance, which may present opportunities to the vendor in an audit.
    • The vendor has earned a reputation for being particularly aggressive with audits. Some vendors include audits as a standard component of their business model to drive revenue. This may include acquiring smaller vendors or software titles that may not have been audit-driven in the past, and running audits on their new customer base.

    “The reality is, software vendors prey on confusion and complication. Where there’s confusion, there’s opportunity.” (Mike Austin, Founder, MetrixData 360)

    Develop an audit response plan

    You will be on the clock once the vendor sends you an audit request. Have a plan ready to go.
    • Don’t panic: Resist knee-jerk reactions. Follow the plan.
    • Form an audit response team and centralize your response: This team should be led by a member of the ITAM group, and it should include IT leadership, software SMEs, representatives from affected business areas, vendor management, contract management, and legal. You may also need to bring on a contractor with deep expertise with the vendor in question to supplement your internal capabilities. Establish clearly who will be the point of contact with the vendor during the audit.
    • Clarify the scope of the audit: Clearly establish what the audit will cover – what products, subsidiaries, contracts, time periods, geographic regions, etc. Manage the auditors to prevent scope creep.
    • Establish who covers audit costs: Vendors may demand the auditee cover the hourly cost of their audit team if you’re significantly out of compliance. Consider asking the vendor to pay for your team’s time if you’re found to be compliant.
    • Know your contract: Vendors’ contracts change over time, and it’s no guarantee that even your vendor’s licensing experts will be aware of the rights you have in your contract. You must know your entitlements to negotiate effectively.
    1. Bring the audit request received to the attention of ITAM and IT leadership. Assemble the response team.
    2. Acknowledge receipt of audit notice.
    3. Negotiate timing and scope of the audit.
    4. Direct staff not to remove or acquire licenses for software under audit without directly involving the ITAM team first.
    5. Gather installation data and documentation to establish current entitlements, including original contract, current contract, addendums, receipts, invoices.
    6. Compare entitlements to installed software.
    7. Investigate any anomalies (e.g. unexpected or non-compliant software).
    8. Review results with the audit response team.

    2.7 Clarify your vendor audit response plan

    1 hour

    Input: Organizational knowledge on your current audit response procedures

    Output: Audit response team membership, High-level audit checklist, A list of things to start, stop, and continue doing as part of the audit response

    Materials: Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers, ITAM business partners

    1. Who’s on the audit response team, and what’s their role? Who will lead the team? Who will be the point of contact with the auditor?
    2. What are the high-level steps in our audit response workflow? Use the example checklist below as a starting point.
    3. What do we need to start, stop, and continue doing in response to audit requests?

    Example Audit Checklist

    • Bring the audit request received to the attention of ITAM and IT leadership. Assemble the response team.
    • Acknowledge receipt of audit notice.
    • Negotiate timing and scope of the audit.
    • Direct staff not to remove or acquire licenses for software under audit without directly involving the ITAM team first.
    • Gather installation data and documentation to establish current entitlements, including original contract, current contract, addendums, receipts, invoices.
    • Compare entitlements to installed software.
    • Investigate any anomalies (e.g. unexpected or non-compliant software).
    • Review results with the audit response team.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Step 2.8: Improve budget processes

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers
    • ITAM business partners

    Outcomes

    • Identify what you need to start, stop, and continue to do to support budgeting processes.

    Improve budgeting and forecasting

    Insert ITAM into budgeting processes to deliver significant value.

    Some examples of what ITAM can bring to the budgeting table:
    • Trustworthy data on deployed assets and spending obligations tied to those assets.
    • Projections of hardware due for replacement in terms of quantity and spend.
    • Knowledge of IT hardware and software contract terms and pricing.
    • Lists of unused or underused hardware and software that could be redeployed to avoid spend.
    • Comparisons of spend year-over-year.

    Being part of the budgeting process positions ITAM for success in other ways:

    • Helps demonstrate the strategic value of the ITAM practice.
    • Provides insight into business and IT strategic projects and priorities for the year.
    • Strengthens relationships with key stakeholders, and positions the ITAM team as trusted partners.

    “Knowing what you have [IT assets] is foundational to budgeting, managing, and optimizing IT spend.” (Dave Kish, Info-Tech, Practice Lead, IT Financial Management)

    Stock image of a calculator.

    2.8 Build better budgets

    20 minutes

    Input: Context on IT budgeting processes

    Output: A list of things to start, stop, and continue doing as part of budgeting exercises

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers, ITAM business partners

    What should we start, stop, and continue doing to support organizational budgeting exercises?

    Start Stop Continue
    • Creating buckets of spend and allocating assets to those buckets.
    • Zero-based review on IaaS instances quarterly.
    • Develop dashboards plugged into asset data for department heads to view allocated assets and spend.
    • Create value reports to demonstrate hard savings as well as cost avoidance.
    • Waiting for business leaders to come to us for help (start reaching out with reports proactively, three months before budget cycle).
    • % increases on IT budgets without further review.
    • Monthly variance budget analysis.
    • What-if analysis for asset spend based on expected headcount increases.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Step 2.9: Establish a documentation framework

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team

    Outcomes

    • Identify key documentation and gaps in your documentation.
    • Establish where documentation should be stored, who should own it, who should have access, and what should trigger a review.

    Create ITAM documentation

    ITAM documentation will typically support governance or operations.

    Long-term planning and governance
    • ITAM policy and/or related policies (procurement policy, security awareness policy, acceptable use policy, etc.)
    • ITAM strategy document
    • ITAM roadmap or burndown list
    • Job descriptions
    • Functional requirements documents for ITAM tools

    Operational documentation

    • ITAM SOPs (hardware, software) and workflows
    • Detailed work instructions/knowledgebase articles
    • ITAM data/records
    • Contracts, purchase orders, invoices, MSAs, SOWs, etc.
    • Effective Licensing Position (ELP) reports
    • Training and communication materials
    • Tool and integration documentation
    • Asset management governance, operations, and tools typically generate a lot of documentation.
    • Don’t create documentation for the sake of documentation. Prioritize building and maintaining documentation that addresses major risks or presents opportunities to improve the consistency and reliability of key processes.
    • Maximize the value of ITAM documentation by ensuring it is as current, accessible, and usable as it needs to be.
    • Clearly identify where documentation is stored and who should have access to it.
    • Identify who is accountable for the creation and maintenance of key documentation, and establish triggers for reviews, updates, and changes.

    Consider ITAM policies

    Create policies that can and will be monitored and enforced.
    • Certain requirements of the ITAM practice may need to be backed up by corporate policies: formal statements of organizational expectations that must be recognized by staff, and which will lead to sanctions/penalties if breached.
    • Some organizations will choose to create one or more ITAM-specific policies. Others will include ITAM-related statements in other existing policies, such as acceptable use policies, security training and awareness policies, procurement policies, configuration policies, e-waste policies, and more.
    • Ensure that you are prepared to monitor compliance with policies and evenly enforce breaches of policy. Failing to consistently enforce your policies exposes you and your organization to claims of negligence or discriminatory conduct.
    • For a template for ITAM-specific policies, see Info-Tech’s policy templates for Hardware Asset Management and Software Asset Management.

    2.9 Establish documentation gaps

    15-30 minutes

    Input: An understanding of existing documentation gaps and risks

    Output: Documentation gaps, Identified owners, repositories, access rights, and review/update protocols

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, Optional: IT managers, ITAM business partners

    Discuss and record the following:

    • What planning/governance, operational, and tooling documentation do we still need to create? Who is accountable for the creation and maintenance of these documents?
    • Where will the documentation be stored? Who can access these documents?
    • What will trigger reviews or changes to the documents?
    Need to Create Owner Stored in Accessible by Trigger for review
    Hardware asset management SOP ITAM manager ITAM SharePoint site › Operating procedures folder
    • All IT staff
    • Annual review
    • As-needed for major tooling changes that require a documentation update

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Step 2.10: Create a roadmap and communication plan

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers

    Outcomes

    • A timeline of key ITAM initiatives.
    • Improvement ideas aligned to key initiatives.
    • A communication plan tailored to key stakeholders.
    • Your ITAM Strategy document.

    “Understand that this is a journey. This is not a 90-day project. And in some organizations, these journeys could be three or five years long.” (Mike Austin, MetrixData 360)

    2.10 Identify key ITAM initiatives

    30-45 minutes

    Input: Organizational strategy documents

    Output: A roadmap that outlines next steps

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers, Project sponsor

    1. Identify key initiatives that are critical to improving practice maturity and meeting business goals.
    2. There should only be a handful of really key initiatives. This is the work that will have the greatest impact on your ability to deliver value. Too many initiatives muddy the narrative and can distract from what really matters.
    3. Plot the target start and end dates for each initiative in the business and IT transformation timeline you created in Phase 1.
    4. Review the chart and consider – what new capabilities should the ITAM practice have once the identified initiatives are complete? What transformational initiatives will you be better positioned to support?

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Transformation Timeline

    Example transformation timeline with row headers 'Business Inititiaves', 'IT Initiatives', and 'ITAM Initiatives'. Each initiative is laid out along the timeline appropriately.

    2.10 Align improvement ideas to initiatives

    45 minutes

    Input: Key initiatives, Ideas for ITAM improvement collected over the course of previous exercises

    Output: Concrete action items to support each initiative

    Materials: The table in the next slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers, Project sponsor

    As you’ve been working through the previous exercises, you have been tracking ideas for improvement – now we’ll align them to your roadmap.

    1. Review the list of ideas for improvement you’ve produced over the working sessions. Consolidate the list – are there any ideas that overlap or complement each other? Record any new ideas. Frame each idea as an action item – something you can actually do.
    2. Connect the action items to initiatives. It may be that not every action item becomes part of a key initiative. (Don’t lose ideas that aren’t part of key initiatives – track them in a separate burndown list or backlog.)
    3. Identify a target completion date and owner for each action item that’s part of an initiative.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Example ITAM initiatives

    Initiative 1: Develop hardware/software standards
    Task Target Completion Owner
    Laptop standards Q1-2023 ITAM manager
    Identify/eliminate contracts for unused software using scan tool Q2-2023 ITAM manager
    Review O365 license levels and standard service Q3-2023 ITAM manager

    Initiative 2: Improve ITAM data quality
    Task Target Completion Owner
    Implement scan agent on all field laptops Q3-2023 Desktop engineer
    Conduct in person audit on identified data discrepancies Q1-2024 ITAM team
    Develop and run user-led audit Q1-2024 Asset manager

    Initiative 3: Acquire & implement a new ITAM tool
    Task Target Completion Owner
    Select an ITAM tool Q3-2023 ITAM manager
    Implement ITAM tool, incl. existing data migration Q1-2024 ITAM manager
    Training on new tool Q1-2024 ITAM manager
    Build KPIs, executive dashboards in new tool Q2-2024 Data analyst
    Develop user-led audit functionality in new tool Q3-2024 ITAM coordinator

    2.10 Create a communication plan

    45 minutes

    Input: Proposed ITAM initiatives, Stakeholder priorities and goals, and an understanding of how ITAM can help them meet those goals

    Output: A high-level communication plan to communicate the benefits and impact of proposed changes to the ITAM program

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: IT asset manager, Project sponsor

    Develop clear, consistent, and targeted messages to key ITAM stakeholders.

    1. Modify the list of stakeholders in the first column.
    2. What benefits should those stakeholders realize from ITAM? What impact may the proposed improvements have on them? Refer back to exercises from Phase 1, where you identified key stakeholders, their priorities, and how ITAM could help them.
    3. Identify communication channels (in-person, email, all-hands meeting, etc.) and timing – when you’ll distribute the message. You may choose to use more than one channel, and you may need to convey the message more than once.
    Group ITAM Benefits Impact Channel(s) Timing
    CFO
    • More accurate IT spend predictions
    • Better equipment utilization and value for money
    • Sponsor integration project between ITAM DB and financial system
    • Support procurement procedures review
    Face-to-face – based on their availability Within the next month
    CIO
    • Better oversight into IT spend
    • Data to help demonstrate IT value
    • Resources required to support tool and ITAM process improvements
    Standing bi-monthly 1:1 meetings Review strategy at next meeting
    IT Managers
    Field Techs

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    2.10 Put the final touches on your ITAM Strategy

    30 minutes

    Input: Proposed ITAM initiatives, Stakeholder priorities and goals, and an understanding of how ITAM can help them meet those goals

    Output: A high-level communication plan to communicate the benefits and impact of proposed changes to the ITAM program

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: IT asset manager, Project sponsor

    You’re almost done! Do a final check of your work before you send a copy to your participants.

    1. Summarize in three points the key findings from the activities you’ve worked through. What have you learned? What are your priorities? What key message do you need to get across? Add these to the appropriate slide near the start of the ITAM Strategy Template.
    2. What are your immediate next steps? Summarize no more than five and add them to the appropriate slide near the start of the ITAM Strategy Template.
      1. Are you asking for something? Approval for ITAM initiatives? Funding? Resources? Clearly identify the ask as part of your next steps.
    3. Are the KPIs identified in Phase 1 still valid? Will they help you monitor for success in the initiatives you’ve identified in Phase 2? Make any adjustments you think are required to the KPIs to reflect the additional completed work.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Kylie Fowler
    Principal Consultant
    ITAM Intelligence

    Kylie is an experienced ITAM/FinOps consultant with a track record of creating superior IT asset management frameworks that enable large companies to optimize IT costs while maintaining governance and control.

    She has operated as an independent consultant since 2009, enabling organizations including Sainsbury's and DirectLine Insurance to leverage the benefits of IT asset management and FinOps to achieve critical business objectives. Recent key projects include defining an end-to-end SAM strategy, target operating model, policies and processes which when implemented provided a 300% ROI.

    She is passionate about supporting businesses of all sizes to drive continuous improvement, reduce risk, and achieve return on investment through the development of creative asset management and FinOps solutions.

    Rory Canavan
    Owner and Principal Consultant
    SAM Charter

    Rory is the founder, owner, and principal consultant of SAM Charter, an internationally recognized consultancy in enterprise-wide Software & IT Asset Management. As an industry leader, SAM Charter is uniquely poised to ensure your IT & SAM systems are aligned to your business requirements.

    With a technical background in business and systems analysis, Rory has a wide range of first-hand experience advising numerous companies and organizations on the best practices and principles pertaining to software asset management. This experience has been gained in both military and civil organizations, including the Royal Navy, Compaq, HP, the Federation Against Software Theft (FAST), and several software vendors.

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Jeremy Boerger
    Founder, Boerger Consulting
    Author of Rethinking IT Asset Management

    Jeremy started his career in ITAM fighting the Y2K bug at the turn of the 21st century. Since then, he has helped companies in manufacturing, healthcare, banking, and service industries build and rehabilitate hardware and software asset management practices.

    These experiences prompted him to create the Pragmatic ITAM method, which directly addresses and permanently resolves the fundamental flaws in current ITAM and SAM implementations.

    In 2016, he founded Boerger Consulting, LLC to help business leaders and decision makers fully realize the promises a properly functioning ITAM can deliver. In his off time, you will find him in Cincinnati, Ohio, with his wife and family.

    Mike Austin
    Founder and CEO
    MetrixData 360

    Mike Austin leads the delivery team at MetrixData 360. Mike brings more than 15 years of Microsoft licensing experience to his clients’ projects. He assists companies, from Fortune 500 to organizations with as few as 500 employees, with negotiations of Microsoft Enterprise Agreements (EA), Premier Support Contracts, and Select Agreements. In addition to helping negotiate contracts, he helps clients build and implement software asset management processes.

    Previously, Mike was employed by Microsoft for more than 8 years as a member of the global sales team. With Microsoft, Mike successfully negotiated more than a billion dollars in new and renewal EAs. Mike has also negotiated legal terms and conditions for all software agreements, developed Microsoft’s best practices for global account management, and was awarded Microsoft’s Gold Star Award in 2003 and Circle of Excellence in 2008 for his contributions.

    Bibliography

    “Asset Management.” SFIA v8. Accessed 17 March 2022.

    Boerger, Jeremy. Rethinking IT Asset Management. Business Expert Press, 2021.

    Canavan, Rory. “C-Suite Cheat Sheet.” SAM Charter, 2021. Accessed 17 March 2022.

    Fisher, Matt. “Metrics to Measure SAM Success.” Snow Software, 26 May 2015. Accessed 17 March 2022.

    Flexera (2021). “State of ITAM Report.” Flexera, 2021. Accessed 17 March 2022.

    Fowler, Kylie. “ITAM by design.” BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT, 2017. Accessed 17 March 2022.

    Fowler, Kylie. “Ch-ch-ch-changes… Is It Time for an ITAM Transformation?” ITAM Intelligence, 2021. Web. Accessed 17 March 2022.

    Fowler, Kylie. “Do you really need an ITAM policy?” ITAM Accelerate, 15 Oct. 2021. Accessed 17 March 2022.

    Hayes, Chris. “How to establish a successful, long-term ITAM program.” Anglepoint, Sept. 2021. Accessed 17 March 2022.

    ISO/IEC 19770-1-2017. IT Asset Management Systems – Requirements. Third edition. ISO, Dec 2017.

    Joret, Stephane. “IT Asset Management: ITIL® 4 Practice Guide”. Axelos, 2020.

    Jouravlev, Roman. “IT Service Financial Management: ITIL® 4 Practice Guide”. Axelos, 2020.

    Pagnozzi, Maurice, Edwin Davis, Sam Raco. “ITAM Vs. ITSM: Why They Should Be Separate.” KPMG, 2020. Accessed 17 March 2022.

    Rumelt, Richard. Good Strategy, Bad Strategy. Profile Books, 2013.

    Stone, Michael et al. “NIST SP 1800-5 IT Asset Management.” Sept, 2018. Accessed 17 March 2022.

    Applications Priorities 2023

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}186|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Architecture & Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /architecture-and-strategy
    • Economic, social, and regulatory conditions have changed livelihoods, businesses, and marketplaces. Modern tools and technologies have acted as lifelines by minimizing operating and delivery costs, and in the process, establishing a strong foundation for growth and maturity.
    • These tools and technologies must meet the top business goals of CXOs: ensure service continuity, improve customer experience, and make data-driven decisions.
    • While today’s business applications are good and well received, there is still room for improvement. The average business application satisfaction score among IT leadership was 72% (n=1582, CIO Business Vision).

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Applications are critical components in any business strategic plan. They can directly influence an organization’s internal and external brand and reputation, such as their uniqueness, competitiveness and innovativeness in the industry
    • Business leaders are continuously looking for innovative ways to better position their application portfolio to satisfy their goals and objectives, i.e., application priorities. Given the scope and costs often involved, these priorities must be carefully crafted to clearly state achievable business outcomes that satisfies the different needs very different customers, stakeholders, and users.
    • Unfortunately, expectations on your applications team have increased while the gap between how stakeholders and applications teams perceive effectiveness remains wide. This points to a need to clarify the requirements to deliver valuable and quality applications and address the pressures challenging your teams.

    Impact and Result

    Learn and explore the technology and practice initiatives in this report to determine which initiatives should be prioritized in your application strategy and align to your business organizational objectives:

    • Optimize the effectiveness of the IT organization.
    • Boost the productivity of the enterprise.
    • Enable business growth through technology.

    Applications Priorities 2023 Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Applications Priorities Report 2023 – A report that introduces and describes five opportunities to prioritize in your 2023 application strategy.

    In this report, we explore five priorities for emerging and leading-edge technologies and practices that can improve on capabilities needed to meet the ambitions of your organization.

    • Applications Priorities 2023 Report

    Infographic

    Further reading

    Applications Priorities 2023

    Applications are the engine of the business: keep them relevant and modern

    What we are facing today is transforming the ways in which we work, live, and relate to one another. Applications teams and portfolios MUST change to meet this reality.

    Economic, social, and regulatory conditions have changed livelihoods, businesses, and marketplaces. Modern tools and technologies have acted as lifelines by minimizing operating and delivery costs, and in the process, establishing a strong foundation for growth and maturity.

    As organizations continue to strengthen business continuity, disaster recovery, and system resilience, activities to simply "keep the lights on" are not enough. Be pragmatic in the prioritization and planning of your applications initiatives, and use your technologies as a foundation for your growth.

    Your applications must meet the top business goals of your CXOs

    • Ensure service continuity
    • Improve customer experience
    • Make data-driven decisions
    • Maximize stakeholder value
    • Manage risk

    Source: CEO-CIO Alignment Diagnostics, August 2021 to July 2022, n=568.

    Select and align your applications priorities to your business goals and objectives

    Applications are critical components in any business strategic plan. They can directly influence an organization's internal and external brand and reputation, such as their:

    • Uniqueness, competitiveness, and innovativeness in the industry.
    • Ability to be dynamic, flexible, and responsive to changing expectations, business conditions, and technologies.

    Therefore, business leaders are continuously looking for innovative ways to better position their application portfolios to satisfy their goals and objectives, i.e. applications priorities. Given the scope and costs often involved, these priorities must be carefully crafted to clearly state achievable business outcomes that satisfy
    the different needs of very different customers, stakeholders, and users.

    Today's business applications are good but leave room for improvement

    72%
    Average business application satisfaction score among IT leadership in 1582 organizations.

    Source: CIO Business Vision, August 2021 to July 2022, N=190.

    Five Applications Priorities for 2023

    In this report, we explore five priorities for emerging and leading-edge technologies and practices that can improve on capabilities needed to meet the Ambitions of your organization.

    this is an image of the Five Applications Priorities for which will be addressed in this blueprint.

    Strengthen your foundations to better support your applications priorities

    These key capabilities are imperative to the success of your applications strategy.

    KPI and Metrics

    Easily attainable and insightful measurements to gauge the progress of meeting strategic objectives and goals (KPIs), and the performance of individual teams, practices and processes (metrics).

    BUSINESS ALIGNMENT

    Gain an accurate understanding and interpretation of stakeholder, end-user, and customer expectations and priorities. These define the success of business products and services considering the priorities of individual business units and teams.

    EFFICIENT DELIVERY & SUPPORT PRACTICE

    Software delivery and support roles, processes, and tools are collaborative, well equipped and resourced, and optimized to meet changing stakeholder expectations.

    Data Management & Governance

    Ensuring data is continuously reliable and trustworthy. Data structure and integrations are defined, governed, and monitored.

    Product & Service Ownership

    Complete inventory and rationalization of the product and service portfolio, prioritized backlogs, roadmaps, and clear product and service ownership with good governance. This helps ensure this portfolio is optimized to meet its goals and objectives.

    Strengthen your foundations to better support your applications priorities (cont'd)

    These key capabilities are imperative to the success of your applications strategy.

    Organizational Change Management

    Manage the adoption of new and modified processes and technologies considering reputational, human, and operational concerns.

    IT Operational Management

    Continuous monitoring and upkeep of products and services to assure business continuity, and system reliability, robustness and disaster recovery.

    Architectural Framework

    A set of principles and standards that guides the consistent, sustainable and scalable growth of enterprise technologies. Changes to the architecture are made in collaboration with affected parties, such as security and infrastructure.

    Application Security

    The measures, controls, and tactics at the application layer that prevent vulnerabilities against external and internal threats and ensure compliance to industry and regulatory security frameworks and standards.

    There are many factors that can stand in your team's way

    Expectations on your applications team have increased, while the gap between how stakeholders and applications teams perceive effectiveness remains wide. This points to a need to clarify the requirements to deliver valuable and quality applications and address the pressures challenging your teams.

    1. Attracting and retaining talent
    2. Maximizing the return on technology
    3. Confidently shifting to digital
    4. Addressing competing priorities
    5. Fostering a collaborative culture
    6. Creating high-throughput teams

    CIOs agree that at least some improvement is needed across key IT activities

    A bar graph is depicted which shows the proportion of CIOs who believe that some, or significant improvement is necessary for the following categories: Measure IT Project Success; Align IT Budget; Align IT Project Approval Process; Measure Stakeholder Satisfaction With IT; Define and Align IT Strategy; Understand Business Goals

    Source: CEO-CIO Alignment Diagnostics, August 2021 to July 2022, n=568.

    Pressure Point 1:
    Attracting and Retaining Talent

    Recent environmental pressures impacted traditional working arrangements and showed more workplace flexibility is often possible. At the same time, many employees' expectations about how, when, and where they choose to work have also evolved. Recruitment and retention are reflections of different sides of the same employee value proposition coin. Organizations that fail to reinvent their approach to attracting and retaining talent by focusing on candidate and employee experience risk turnover, vacancies, and lost opportunities that can negatively impact the bottom line.

    Address the underlying challenges

    • Lack of employee empowerment and few opportunities for learning and development.
    • Poor coworker and manager relationships.
    • Compensation and benefits are inadequate to maintain desired quality of life.
    • Unproductive work environment and conflicting balance of work and life.
    • Unsatisfactory employee experience, including lack of employee recognition
      and transparency of organizational change.

    While workplace flexibility comes with many benefits, longer work hours jeopardize wellbeing.
    62% of organizations reported increased working hours, while 80% reported an increase in flexibility.
    Source: McLean & Company, 2022; n=394.

    Be strategic in how you fill and train key IT skills and capabilities

    • Cybersecurity
    • Big Data/Analytics
    • Technical Architecture
    • DevOps
    • Development
    • Cloud

    Source: Harvey Nash Group, 2021; n=2120.

    Pressure Point 2:
    Maximizing the Return of Technology

    Recent environmental pressures impacted traditional working arrangements and showed more workplace flexibility is often possible. At the same time, many employees' expectations about how, when, and where they choose to work have also evolved. Recruitment and retention are reflections of different sides of the same employee value proposition coin. Organizations that fail to reinvent their approach to attracting and retaining talent by focusing on candidate and employee experience risk turnover, vacancies, and lost opportunities that can negatively impact the bottom line.

    Address the underlying challenges

    • Inability to analyze, propose, justify, and communicate modernization solutions in language the stakeholders understand and in a way that shows they clearly support business priorities and KPIs and mitigate risks.
    • Little interest in documenting and rationalizing products and services through business-IT collaboration.
    • Lack of internal knowledge of the system and loss of vendor support.
    • Undefined, siloed product and service ownership and governance, preventing solutions from working together to collectively deliver more value.
    • Little stakeholder appetite to invest in activities beyond "keeping the lights on."

    Only 64% of applications were identified as effective by end users.
    Effective applications are identified as at least highly important and have high feature and usability satisfaction.
    Source: Application Portfolio Assessment, August 2021 to July 2022; N=315.

    "Regardless of the many definitions of modernization floating around, the one characteristic that we should be striving for is to ensure our applications do an outstanding job of supporting the users and the business in the most effective and efficient manner possible."
    Source: looksoftware.

    Pressure Point 3:
    Confidently Shifting to Digital

    "Going digital" reshapes how the business operates and drives value by optimizing how digital and traditional technologies and tactics work together. This shift often presents significant business and technical risks to business processes, enterprise data, applications, and systems which stakeholders and teams are not aware of or prepared to accommodate.

    Address the underlying challenges

    • Differing perspectives on digital can lead to disjointed transformation initiatives, oversold benefits, and a lack of synergy among digital technologies and processes.
    • Organizations have difficulty adapting to new technologies or rethinking current business models, processes, and ways of working because of the potential human, ethical, and reputational impacts and restrictions from legacy systems.
    • Management lacks a framework to evaluate how their organization manages and governs business value delivery.
    • IT is not equipped or resourced to address these rapidly changing business, customer, and technology needs.
    • The wrong tools and technologies were chosen to support the shift to digital.

    The shift to digital processes is starting, but slowly.
    62% of respondents indicated that 1-20% of their processes were digitized during the past year.
    Source: Tech Trends and Priorities 2023; N=500

    Resistance to change and time/budget constraints are top barriers preventing companies from modernizing their applications.
    Source: Konveyor, 2022; n=600.

    Pressure Point 4:
    Addressing Competing Priorities

    Enterprise products and services are not used, operated, or branded in isolation. The various parties involved may have competing priorities, which often leads to disagreements on when certain business and technology changes should be made and how resources, budget, and other assets should be allocated. Without a broader product vision, portfolio vision, and roadmap, the various dependent or related products and services will not deliver the same level of value as if they were managed collectively.

    Address the underlying challenges

    • Undefined product and service ownership and governance, including escalation procedures when consensus cannot be reached.
    • Lack of a unified and grounded set of value and quality definitions, guiding principles, prioritization standards, and broad visibility across portfolios, business capabilities, and business functions.
    • Distrust between business units and IT teams, which leads to the scaling of unmanaged applications and fragmented changes and projects.
    • Decisions are based on opinions and experiences without supporting data.

    55% of CXOs stated some improvement is necessary in activities to understand business goals.
    Source: CEO-CIO Alignment Diagnostics, August 2021 to July 2022; n=568.

    CXOs are moderately satisfied with IT's performance as a business partner (average score of 69% among all CXOs). This sentiment is similarly felt among CIOs (64%).
    Source: CEO-CIO Alignment Diagnostics, August 2021 to July 2022; n=568.

    Pressure Point 5:
    Fostering a Collaborative Culture

    Culture impacts business results, including bottom-line revenue and productivity metrics. Leaders appreciate the impact culture can have on applications initiatives and wish to leverage this. How culture translates from an abstract concept to something that is measurable and actionable is not straightforward. Executives need to clarify how the desired culture will help achieve their applications strategy and need to focus on the items that will have the most impact.

    Address the underlying challenges

    • Broad changes do not consider the unique subcultures, personalities, and behaviors of the various teams and individuals in the organization.
    • Leaders mandate cultural changes without alleviating critical barriers and do not embody the principles of the target state.
    • Bureaucracy and politics restrict changes and encourage the status quo.
    • Industry standards, technologies, and frameworks do not support or cannot be tailored to fit the desired culture.
    • Some teams are deliberately excluded from the scoping, planning, and execution of key product and service delivery and management activities.

    Agile does not solve team culture challenges.
    43% of organizations cited organizational culture as a significant barrier to adopting and scaling Agile practices.
    Source: Digital.ai, 2021.

    "Providing a great employee experience" as the second priority (after recruiting) highlights the emphasis organizations are placing on helping employees adjust after having been forced to change the way work gets done.
    Source: McLean & Company, 2022; N=826.

    Use your applications priorities to help address your pressure points

    Success can be dependent on your ability to navigate around or alleviate your pressure points. Design and market your applications priorities to bring attention to your pressure points and position them as key risk factors to their success.

    Applications Priorities
    Digital Experience (DX) Intelligent Automation Proactive Application Management Multisource Systems Digital Organization as a Platform
    Attracting and Retaining Talent Enhance the employee experience Be transparent and support role changes Shift focus from maintenance to innovation Enable business-managed applications Promote and showcase achievements and successes
    Maximizing the Return on Technology Modernize or extend the use of existing investments Automate applications across multiple business functions Improve the reliability of mission-critical applications Enhance the functionality of existing applications Increase visibility of underused applications
    Confidently Shifting to Digital Prioritize DX in your shift to digital Select the capabilities that will benefit most from automation Prepare applications to support digital tools and technologies Use best-of-breed tools to meet specific digital needs Bring all applications up to a common digital standard
    Addressing Competing Priorities Ground your digital vision, goals, and objectives Recognize and evaluate the architectural impact Rationalize the health of the applications Agree on a common philosophy on system composition Map to a holistic platform vision, goals, and objectives
    Fostering a Collaborative Culture Involve all perspectives in defining and delivering DX Involve the end user in the delivery and testing of the automated process Include the technical perspective in the viability of future applications plans Discuss how applications can work together better in an ecosystem Ensure the platform is configured to meet the individual needs of the users
    Creating High-Throughput Teams Establish delivery principles centered on DX Remove manual, error-prone, and mundane tasks Simplify applications to ease delivery and maintenance Alleviate delivery bottlenecks and issues Abstract the enterprise system to expedite delivery

    Digital Experience (DX)

    PRIORITY 1

    • Deliver Valuable User, Customer, Employee, and Brand Experiences

    Delivering valuable digital experiences requires the adoption of good management, governance, and operational practices to accommodate stakeholder, employee, customer, and end-user expectations of digital experiences (e.g. product management, automation, and iterative delivery). Technologies are chosen based on what best enables, delivers, and supports these expectations.

    Introduction

    Digital transformation is not just about new tools and technologies. It is also about delivering a valuable digital experience

    What is digital experience (DX)?

    Digital experience (DX) refers to the interaction between a user and an organization through digital products and services. Digital products and services are tools, systems, devices, and resources that gather, store, and process data; are continuously modernized; and embody eight key attributes that are described on the following slide. DX is broken down into four distinct perspectives*:

    • Customer Experience – The immediate perceptions of transactions and interactions experienced through a customer's journey in the use of the organization's digital
      products and services.
    • End-User Experience – Users' emotions, beliefs, and physical and psychological responses
      that occur before, during, or after interacting with a digital product or service.
    • Brand Experience – The broader perceptions, emotions, thoughts, feelings and actions the public associate with the organization's brand and reputation or its products and services. Brand experience evolves over time as customers continuously engage with the brand.
    • Employee Experience – The satisfaction and experience of an employee through their journey with the organization, from recruitment and hiring to their departure. How an employee embodies and promotes the organization brand and culture can affect their performance, trust, respect, and drive to innovate and optimize.
    Digital Products and Services
    Customer Experience Brand Experience Employee Experience End-User Experience

    Digital products and services have a common set of attributes

    Digital transformation is not just about new tools and technologies. It is also about delivering a valuable digital experience

    • Digital products and services must keep pace with changing business and end-user needs as well as tightly supporting your maturing business model with continuous modernization. Focus your continuous modernization on the key characteristics that drive business value.
    • Fit for purpose: Functionalities are designed and implemented for the purpose of satisfying the end user's needs and solving their problems.
    • User-centric: End users see the product as rewarding, engaging, intuitive, and emotionally satisfying. They want to come back to it.
    • Adaptable: The product can be quickly tailored to meet changing end-user and technology needs with reusable and customizable components.
    • Accessible: The product is available on demand and on the end user's preferred interface.
      End users have a seamless experience across all devices.
    • Private and secured: The end user's activity and data are protected from unauthorized access.
    • Informative and insightful: The product delivers consumable, accurate, and trustworthy real-time data that is important to the end user.
    • Seamless application connection: The product facilitates direct interactions with one or more other products through an uninterrupted user experience.
    • Relationship and network building: The product enables and promotes the connection and interaction of people.

    The Business Value cycle of continuous modernization.

    Signals

    DX is critical for business growth and maturity, but the organization may not be ready

    A good DX has become a key differentiator that gives organizations an advantage over their competition and peers. Shifts in working environments; employee, customer, and stakeholder expectations; and the advancements in modern technologies have raised the importance of adopting and transitioning to digital processes and tools to stay relevant and responsive to changing business and technology conditions.

    Applications teams are critical to ensuring the successful delivery and operation of these digital processes and tools. However, they are often under-resourced and challenged to meet their DX goals.

    • 7% of both business and IT respondents think IT has the resources needed to keep up with digital transformation initiatives and meet deadlines (Cyara, 2021).
    • 43% of respondents said that the core barrier to digital transformation is a lack of skilled resources (Creatio, 2021).
    A circle graph is shown with 91% of the circle coloured in dark blue, with the number 91% in the centre.

    of organizations stated that at least 1% of processes were shifted from being manually completed to digitally completed in the last year. 29% of organizations stated at least 21% were shifted.

    Source: Tech Trends and Priorities 2023; N=500.

    A circle graph is shown with 98% of the circle coloured in dark blue, with the number 98% in the centre.

    of organizations recognized digital transformation is important for competitive advantage. 94% stated it is important to enhance customer experience, and 91% stated it will have a positive impact on revenue.

    Source: Cyara, 2021.

    Drivers

    Brand and reputation

    Customers are swayed by the innovations and advancements in digital technologies and expect your applications team to deliver and support them. Your leaders recognize the importance of these expectations and are integrating them into their business strategy and brand (how the organization presents itself to its customers, employees and the public). They hope that their actions will improve and shape the company's reputation (public perception of the company) as effective, customer-focused, and forward-thinking.

    Worker productivity

    As you evolve and adopt more complex tools and technology, your stakeholders will expect more from business units and IT teams. Unfortunately, teams employing manual processes and legacy systems will struggle to meet these expectations. Digital products and services promote the simplification of complex operations and applications and help the business and your teams better align operational practices with strategic goals and deliver valuable DX.

    Organization modernization

    Legacy processes, systems, and ways of working are no longer suitable for meeting the strategic digital objectives and DX needs stakeholders expect. They drive up operational costs without increased benefits, impede business growth and innovation, and consume scarce budgets that could be used for other priorities. Shifting to digital tools and technologies will bring these challenges to light and demonstrate how modernization is an integral part of DX success.

    Benefits & Risks

    Benefits

    • Flexibility & Satisfaction
    • Adoption
    • Reliability

    Employees and customers can choose how they want to access, modify, and consume digital products and services. They can be tailored to meet the specific functional needs, behaviors, and habits of the end user.

    The customer, end user, brand, and employee drive selection, design, and delivery of digital products and services. Even the most advanced technologies will fail if key roles do not see the value in their use.

    Digital products and services are delivered with technical quality built into them, ensuring they meet the industry, regulatory, and company standards throughout their lifespan and in various conditions.

    Risks

    • Legacy & Lore
    • Bureaucracy & Politics
    • Process Inefficiencies
    • No Quality Standards

    Some stakeholders may not be willing to change due to their familiarity and comfort of business practices.

    Competing and conflicting priorities of strategic products and services undermine digital transformation and broader modernization efforts.

    Business processes are often burdened by wasteful activities. Digital products and services are only as valuable as the processes they support.

    The performance and support of your digital products and services are hampered due to unmanageable technical debt because of a deliberate decision to bypass or omit quality good practices.

    Address your pressure points to fully realize the benefits of this priority

    Success can be dependent on your ability to address your pressure points.

    Attracting and Retaining Talent

    Enhance the employee experience.

    Design the digital processes, tools, and technologies to meet the individual needs of the employee.

    Maximizing the Return on Technology

    Modernize or extend the use of existing investments.

    Drive higher adoption of applications and higher user value and productivity by implementing digital capabilities to the applications that will gain the most.

    Confidently Shifting to Digital

    Prioritize DX in your shift to digital. Include DX as part of your definition of success.

    Your products and services are not valuable if users, customers, and employees do not use them.

    Addressing Competing Priorities

    Ground your digital vision, goals, and objectives

    Establish clear ownership of DX and digital products and services with a cross-functional prioritization framework.

    Fostering a Collaborative Culture

    Involve all perspectives in defining and delivering DX.

    Maintain a committee of owners, stakeholders, and delivery teams to ensure consensus and discuss how to address cross-functional opportunities and risks.

    Creating High-Throughput Teams

    Establish delivery principles centered on DX.

    Enforce guiding principles to streamline and simplify DX delivery, such as plug-and-play architecture and quality standards.

    Recommendations

    Build a digital business strategy

    A digital business strategy clearly articulates the goals and ambitions of the business to adopt digital practices, tools, and technologies. This document:

    • Looks for ways to transform the business by identifying what technologies to embrace, what processes to automate, and what new business models to create.
    • Unifies digital possibilities with your customer experiences.
    • Establishes accountability with the executive leadership.
    • States the importance of cross-functional participation from senior management across the organization.

    Related Research:

    Learn, understand, and empathize with your users, employees, and customers

    • To create a better product, solution, or service, understanding those who use it, their needs, and their context is critical.
    • A great experience design practice can help you balance those goals so that they are in harmony with those of your users.
    • IT leaders must find ways to understand the needs of the business and develop empathy on a much deeper level. This empathy is the foundation for a thriving business partnership.

    Related Research:

    Recommendations

    Center product and service delivery decisions and activities on DX and quality

    User, customer, employee, and brand are integral perspectives on the software development lifecycle (SDLC) and the management and governance practices supporting digital products and services. It ensures quality standards and controls are consistently upheld while maintaining alignment with various needs and priorities. The goal is to come to a consensus on a universal definition and approach to embed quality and DX-thinking throughout the delivery process.

    Related Research:

    Instill collaborative delivery practices

    Today's rapidly scaling and increasingly complex digital products and services create mounting pressure on delivery teams to release new features and changes quickly and with sufficient quality. This pressure is further compounded by the competing priorities of individual stakeholders and the nuances among different personas of digital products and services.

    A collaborative delivery practice sets the activities, channels, and relationships needed to deliver a valuable and quality product or service with cross-functional awareness, accountability, and agreement.

    Related Research:

    Recommendations

    Continuously monitor and modernize your digital products and services

    Today's modern digital products and services are tomorrow's shelfware. They gradually lose their value, and the supporting technologies will become obsolete. Modernization is a continuous need.

    Data-driven insights help decision makers decide which products and services to retire, upgrade, retrain on, or maintain to meet the demands of the business.

    Enhancements focusing on critical business capabilities strengthen the case for investment and build trust with all stakeholders.

    Related Research:

    CASE STUDY
    Mastercard in Asia

    Focus on the customer journey

    Chief Marketing Officer M.V. Rajamannar (Raja) wanted to change Mastercard's iconic "Priceless" ad campaign (with the slogan "There are some things money can't buy. For everything else there's Mastercard."). The main reasons were that the campaign relied on one-way communication and targeted end customers, even though Mastercard doesn't issue cards directly to customers; partner banks do. To drive the change in campaign, Raja and his team created a digital engine that leveraged digital and social media. Digital engine is a seven-step process based on insights gleaned from data and real-time optimization.

    1. Emotional spark: Using data to understand customers' passion points, Mastercard builds videos and creatives to ignite an emotional spark and give customers a reason to engage. For example, weeks before New Year's Eve, Mastercard produced a video with Hugh Jackman to encourage customers to submit a story about someone who deeply mattered to them. The authors of the winning story would be flown to reunite with those both distant and dear.
    2. Engagement: Mastercard targets the right audience with a spark video through social media to encourage customers to share their stories.
    3. Offers: To help its partner banks and merchants in driving their business, the company identifies the best offers to match consumers' interests. In the above campaign, Mastercard's Asia-Pacific team found that Singapore was a favorite destination for Indian customers, so they partnered with Singapore's Resorts World Sentosa with an attractive offer.
    4. Real-time optimization: Mastercard optimizes, in real time, a portfolio of several offers through A/B testing and other analysis.
    5. Amplification: Real-time testing provides confidence to Mastercard about the potential success of these offers and encourages its bank and merchant partners to co-market and co-fund these campaigns.
    6. Network effects: A few weeks after consumers submitted their stories about distant loved ones, Mastercard selected winners, produced videos of them surprising their friends and families, and used these videos in social media to encourage sharing.
    7. Incremental transactions: These programs translate into incremental business for banks who issue cards, for merchants where customers spend money, and for Mastercard, which gets a portion of every transaction.

    Source: Harvard Business Review Press

    CASE STUDY
    Mastercard in Asia (cont'd)

    Focus on the customer journey

    1. Emotional Spark
      Drives genuine personal stories
    2. Engagement
      Through Facebook
      and social media
    3. Offers
      From merchants
      and Mastercard assets
    4. Optimization
      Real-time testing of offers and themes
    5. Amplification
      Paid and organic programmatic buying
    6. Network Effects
      Sharing and
      mass engagement
    7. Incremental Transactions
      Win-win for all parties

    CASE STUDY
    Mastercard in Asia (cont'd)

    The Mastercard case highlights important lessons on how to engage customers:

    • Have a broad message. Brands need to connect with consumers over how they live and spend their time. Organizations need to go beyond the brand or product message to become more relevant to consumers' lives. Dove soap was very successful in creating a conversation among consumers with its "Real Beauty" campaign, which focused not on the brand or even the product category, but on how women and society view beauty.
    • Shift from storytelling to story making. To break through the clutter of advertising, companies need to move from storytelling to story making. A broader message that is emotionally engaging allows for a two-way conversation.
    • Be consistent with the brand value. The brand needs to stand for something, and the content should be relevant to and consistent with the image of the brand. Pepsi announced an award of $20 million in grants to individuals, businesses, and nonprofits that promote a new idea to make a positive impact on community. A large number of submissions were about social causes that had nothing to do with Pepsi, and some, like reducing obesity, were in conflict with Pepsi's product.
    • Create engagement that drives business. Too much entertainment in ads may engage customers but detract from both communicating the brand message and increasing sales. Simply measuring the number of video views provides only a partial picture of a program's success.

    Intelligent Automation

    PRIORITY 2

    • Extend Automation Practices with AI and ML

    AI and ML are rapidly growing. Organizations see the value of machines intelligently executing high-performance and dynamic tasks such as driving cars and detecting fraud. Senior leaders see AI and ML as opportunities to extend their business process automation investments.

    Introduction

    Intelligent automation is the next step in your business process automation journey

    What is intelligent automation (IA)?

    Intelligent automation (IA) is the combination of traditional automation technologies, such as business process management (BPM) and robotic process automation (RPA), with AI and ML. The goal is to further streamline and scale decision making across various business processes by:

    • Removing human interactions.
    • Addressing decisions that involve complex variables.
    • Automatically adapting processes to changing conditions.
    • Bridging disparate automation technologies into an integrated end-to-end value delivery pipeline.

    "For IA to succeed, employees must be involved in the transformation journey so they can experience firsthand the benefits of a new way of working and creating business value," (Cognizant).

    What is the difference between IA and hyperautomation?

    "Hyperautomation is the act of automating everything in an organization that can be automated. The intent is to streamline processes across an organization using intelligent automation, which includes AI, RPA and other technologies, to run without human intervention. … Hyperautomation is a business-driven, disciplined approach that organizations use to rapidly identify, vet, and automate as many business and IT processes as possible" (IBM, 2021).

    Note that hyperautomation often enables IA, but teams solely adopting IA do not need to abide to its automation-first principles.

    IA is a combination of various tools and technologies

    What tools and technologies are involved in IA?

    • Artificial intelligence (AI) & Machine Learning (ML) – AI systems perform tasks mimicking human intelligence such as learning from experience and problem solving. AI is making its own decisions without human intervention. Machine learning systems learn from experience and without explicit instructions. They learn patterns from data then analyze and make predictions based on past behavior and the patterns learned. AI is a combination of technologies and can include machine learning.
    • Intelligent Business Process Management System (iBPMS) – Combination of BPM tools with AI and other intelligence capabilities.
    • Robotic Process Automation (RPA) – Robots leveraging an application's UI rather than programmatic access. Automate rules-based, repetitive tasks performed by human workers with AI/ML.
    • Process Mining & Discovery – Process mining involves reading system event logs and application transactions and applying algorithmic analysis to automatically identify and map inferred business processes. Process discovery involves unintrusive virtual agents that sit on a user's desktop and record and monitor how they interact with applications to perform tasks and processes. Algorithms are then used to map and analyze the processes.
    • Intelligent Document Processing – The conversion of physical or unstructured documents into a structured, digital format that can be used in automation solutions. Optical character recognition (OCR) and natural language processing (NPL) are common tools used to enable this capability.
    • Advanced Analytics – The gathering, synthesis, transformation, and delivery of insightful and consumable information that supports data-driven decision making. Data is queried from various disparate sources and can take on a variety of structured and unstructured formats.

    The cycle of IA technologies

    Signals

    Process automation is an executive priority and requires organizational buy-in

    Stakeholders recognize the importance of business process automation and AI and are looking for ways to deliver more value using these technologies.

    • 90% of executives stated automating business workflows post-COVID-19 will ensure business continuity (Kofax, 2022).
    • 88% of executives stated they need to fast-track their end-to-end digital transformation (Kofax, 2022).

    However, the advertised benefits to vendors of enabling these desired automations may not be easily achievable because of:

    • Manual and undocumented business processes.
    • Fragmented and inaccessible systems.
    • Poor data quality, insights, and security.
    • The lack of process governance and management practice.
    A circle graph is shown with 49% of the circle coloured in dark blue, with the number 49% in the centre.

    of CXOs stated staff sufficiency, skill and engagement issues as a minor IT pain point compared to 51% of CIOs stated this issue as a major pain point.

    Source: CEO-CIO Alignment Diagnostics, August 2021 to July 2022; n=568.

    A circle graph is shown with 36% of the circle coloured in dark blue, with the number 36% in the centre.

    of organizations have already invested in AI or machine learning.

    Source: Tech Trends and Priorities 2023; N=662

    Drivers

    Quality & throughput

    Products and services delivered through an undefined and manual process risk the creation of preventable and catchable defects, security flaws and holes, missing information, and other quality issues. IA solutions consistently reinforce quality standards the same way across all products and services while tailoring outputs to meet an individual's specific needs. Success is dependent on the accurate interpretation and application of quality standards and the user's expectations.

    Worker productivity

    IA removes the tedious, routine, and mundane tasks that distract and restrict employees from doing more valuable, impactful, and cognitively focused activities. Practical insights can also be generated through IA tools that help employees make data-driven decisions, evaluate problems from different angles, and improve the usability and value of the products and services they produce.

    Good process management practices

    Automation magnifies existing inefficiencies of a business process management practice, such as unclear and outdated process documentation and incorrect assumptions. IA reinforces the importance of good business process optimization practices, such as removing waste and inefficiencies in a thoughtful way, choosing the most appropriate automation solution, and configuring the process in the right way to maximize the solution's value.

    Benefits & Risks

    Benefits

    • Documentation
    • Hands-Off
    • Reusability

    All business processes must be mapped and documented to be automated, including business rules, data entities, applications, and control points.

    IA can be configured and orchestrated to automatically execute when certain business, process, or technology conditions are met in an unattended or attended manner.

    IA is applicable in use cases beyond traditional business processes, such as automated testing, quality control, audit, website scraping, integration platform, customer service, and data transfer.

    Risks

    • Data Quality & Bias
    • Ethics
    • Recovery & Security
    • Management

    The accuracy and relevance of the decisions IA makes are dependent on the overall quality of the data
    used to train it.

    Some decisions can have significant reputational, moral, and ethical impacts if made incorrectly.
    The question is whether it is appropriate for a non-human to make that decision.

    IA is composed of technologies that can be compromised or fail. Without the proper monitoring, controls,
    and recovery protocols, impacted IA will generate significant business and IT costs and can potentially harm customers, employees, and the organization.

    Low- and no-code capabilities ease and streamline IA development, which makes it susceptible to becoming unmanageable. Discipline is needed to ensure IA owners are aware of the size and health of the IA portfolio.

    Address your pressure points to fully realize the benefits of this priority

    Success can be dependent on your ability to address your pressure points.

    Attracting and Retaining Talent

    Be transparent and support role changes.

    Plan to address the human sentiment with automation (e.g. job security) and the transition of the role to other activities.

    Maximizing the Return on Technology

    Automate applications across multiple business functions.

    Recognize the value opportunities of improving and automating the integration of cross-functional processes.

    Confidently Shifting to Digital

    Maximize the learning of automation fit.

    Select the right capabilities to demonstrate the value of IA while using lessons learned to establish the appropriate support.

    Addressing Competing Priorities

    Recognize automation opportunities with capability maps.

    Use a capability diagram to align strategic IA objectives with tactical and technical IA initiatives.

    Fostering a Collaborative Culture

    Involve the user in the delivery process.

    Maximize automation adoption by ensuring the user finds value in its use before deployment.

    Creating High-Throughput Teams

    Remove manual, error-prone, and mundane tasks.

    Look for ways to improve team throughput by removing wasteful activities, enforcing quality, and automating away tasks driving down productivity.

    Recommendations

    Build your business process automation playbook and practice

    Formalize your business process automation practice with a good toolkit and a repeatable set of tactics and techniques.

    • Clarify the problem being solved with IA.
    • Optimate your processes. Apply good practices to first optimize (opti-) and then automate (-mate) key business processes.
    • Deliver minimum viable automations (MVAs). Maximize the learning of automation solutions and business operational changes through small, strategic automation use cases.

    Related Research:

    Explore the various IA tooling options

    Each IA tool will address a different problem. Which tool to choose is dependent on a variety of factors, such as functional suitability, technology suitability, delivery and support capabilities, alignment to strategic business goals, and the value it is designed to deliver.

    Related Research:

    Recommendations

    Introduce AI and ML thoughtfully and with a plan

    Despite the many promises of AI, organizations are struggling to fully realize its potential. The reasons boil down to a lack of understanding of when these technologies should and shouldn't be used, as well as a fear of the unknown. The plan to adopt AI should include:

    • Understanding of what AI really means in practice.
    • Identifying specific applications of AI in the business.
    • Understanding the type of AI applicable for the situation.

    Related Research:

    Mitigate AI and ML bias

    Biases can be introduced into an IA system at any stage of the development process, from the data you collect, to the way you collect it, to which algorithms are used and what assumptions were made. In most cases, AI and ML bias is a is a social, political, and business problem.

    While bias may not be intentional nor completely prevented or eliminated, early detection, good design, and other proactive preventative steps can be taken to minimize its scope and impact.

    Related Research:

    CASE STUDY
    University Hospitals

    Challenge

    University Hospitals Cleveland (UH) faces the same challenge that every major hospital confronts regarding how to deliver increasingly complex, high-quality healthcare to a diverse population efficiently and economically. In 2017, UH embarked on a value improvement program aiming to improve quality while saving $400 million over a five-year period.

    In emergency department (ED) and inpatient units, leaders found anticipating demand difficult, and consequently units were often over-staffed when demand was low and under-staffed when demand was high. Hospital leaders were uncertain about how to reallocate resources based on capacity needs.

    Solution

    UH turned to Hospital IQ's Census Solution to proactively manage capacity, staff, and flow in the ED and inpatient areas.

    By applying AI, ML, and external data (e.g. weather forecasts) to the hospital's own data (including EMR data and hospital policies), the solution helped UH make two-day census forecasts that managers used to determine whether to open or close in-patient beds and, when necessary, divert low-acuity patients to other hospitals in the system to handle predicted patient volume.

    Source: University Hospitals

    Results

    ED boarding hours have declined by 10% and the hospital has seen a 50% reduction in the number of patients who leave the hospital without
    being seen.

    UH also predicts in advance patients ready for discharge and identifies roadblocks, reducing the average length of stay by 15%. UH is able to better manage staff, reducing overtime and cutting overall labor costs.

    The hospital has also increased staff satisfaction and improved patient safety by closing specific units on weekends and increasing the number of rooms that can be sterilized.

    Proactive Application Management

    PRIORITY 3

    • Strengthen Applications to Prevent and Minimize the Impact of Future Issues

    Application management is often viewed as a support function rather than an enabler of business growth. Focus and investments are only placed on application management when it becomes a problem. The lack of governance and practice accountability leaves this practice in a chaotic state: politics take over, resources are not strategically allocated, and customers are frustrated. As a result, application management is often reactive and brushed aside for new development.

    Introduction

    What is application management?

    Application management ensures valuable software is successfully delivered and is maintained for continuous and sustainable business operations. It contains a repeatable set of activities needed to rationalize and roadmap products and services while balancing priorities of new features and maintenance tasks.

    Unfortunately, application management is commonly perceived as a practice that solely addresses issues, updates, and incidents. However, application management teams are also tasked with new value delivery that was not part of the original release.

    Why is an effective application maintenance (reactive) practice not good enough?

    Application maintenance is the "process of modifying a software system or its components after delivery to correct faults, improve performance or other attributes, or adapt to a changed environment or business process," (IEEE, 1998). While it is critical to quickly fix defects and issues when they occur, reactively addressing them is more expensive than discovering them early and employing the practices to prevent them.

    Even if an application is working well, its framework, architecture, and technology may not be compatible with the possible upcoming changes stakeholders and vendors may want to undertake. Applications may not be problems now, but they soon can be.

    What motivates proactive application changes?

    This image shows the motivations for proactive application changes, sorted by external and internal sources.

    Proactive application management must be disciplined and applied strategically

    Proactive application management practices are critical to maintaining business continuity. They require continuous review and modification so that applications are resilient and can address current and future scenarios. Depending on the value of the application, its criticality to business operations, and its susceptibility to technology change, a more proactive management approach may be warranted. Stakeholders can then better manage resources and budget according to the needs of specific products.

    Reactive Management

    Run-to-Failure

    Fix and enhance the product when it breaks. In most cases, a plan is in place ahead of a failure, so that the problem can be addressed without significant disruption and costs.

    Preventive

    Regularly inspect and optimize the product to reduce the likelihood that it will fail in the future. Schedule inspections based on a specific timeframe or usage threshold.

    Predictive

    Predict failures before they happen using performance and usage data to alert teams when products are at risk of failure according to specified conditions.

    Reliability and Risk Based

    Analyze all possible failure scenarios for each component of the product and create tailored delivery plans to improve the stability, reliability, and value of each product.

    Proactive Management

    Signals

    Applications begin to degrade as soon as they are used

    Today's applications are tomorrow's shelfware. They gradually lose their value, stability, robustness, and compatibility with other enterprise technologies. The longer these applications are left unattended or simply "keeping the lights on," the more risks they will bring to the application portfolio, such as:

    • Discovery and exploitation of security flaws and gaps.
    • Increasing the lock-in to specific vendor technologies.
    • Inconsistent application performance across various workloads.

    These impacts are further compounded by the continuous work done on a system burdened with technical debt. Technical debt describes the result of avoided costs that, over time, cause ongoing business impacts. Left unaddressed, technical debt can become an existential threat that risks your organization's ability to effectively compete and serve its customers. Unfortunately, most organizations have a significant, growing, unmanageable technical debt portfolio.

    A circle graph is shown with 60% of the circle coloured in dark green, with the number 60% in the centre.

    of respondents stated they saw an increase in perceived change in technical debt during the past three years. A quarter of respondents indicated that it stayed the same.

    Source: McKinsey Digital, 2020.

    US
    $4.35
    Million

    is the average cost of a data breach in 2022. This figure represents a 2.6% increase from last year. The average cost has climbed 12.7% since 2020.

    Source: IBM, 2022; N=537.

    Drivers

    Technical debt

    Historical decisions to meet business demands by deferring key quality, architectural, or other software delivery activities often lead to inefficient and incomplete code, fragile legacy systems, broken processes, data quality problems, and the other contributors to technical debt. The impacts for this challenge is further heightened if organizations are not actively refactoring and updating their applications behind the scenes. Proactive application management is intended to raise awareness of application fragility and prioritize comprehensive refactoring activities alongside new feature development.

    Long-term application value

    Applications are designed, developed, and tested against a specific set of parameters which may become less relevant over time as the business matures, technology changes, and user behaviors and interactions shift. Continuous monitoring of the application system, regular stakeholder and user feedback, and active technology trend research and vendor engagement will reveal tasks to prepare an application for future value opportunities or stability and resilience concerns.

    Security and resiliency

    Innovative approaches to infiltrating and compromising applications are becoming prevailing stakeholder concerns. The loopholes and gaps in existing application security protocols, control points, and end-user training are exploited to gain the trust of unsuspecting users and systems. Proactive application management enforces continuous security reviews to determine whether applications are at risk. The goal is to prevent an incident from happening by hardening or complementing measures already in place.

    Benefits & Risks

    Benefits

    • Consistent Performance
    • Robustness
    • Operating Costs

    Users expect the same level of performance and experience from their applications in all scenarios. A proactive approach ensures the configurations meet the current needs of users and dependent technologies.

    Proactively managed applications are resilient to the latest security concerns and upcoming trends.

    Continuous improvements to the underlying architecture, codebase, and interfaces can minimize the cost to maintain and operate the application, such as the transition to a loosely coupled architecture and the standardization of REST APIs.

    Risks

    • Stakeholder Buy-In
    • Delayed Feature Releases
    • Team Capacity
    • Discipline

    Stakeholders may not see the association between the application's value and its technical quality.

    Updates and enhancements are system changes much like any application function. Depending
    on the priority of these changes, new functions may be pushed off to a future release cycle.

    Applications teams require dedicated capacity to proactively manage applications, but they are often occupied meeting other stakeholder demands.

    Overinvesting in certain application management activities (such as refactoring, re-architecture, and redesign) can create more challenges. Knowing how much to do is important.

    Address your pressure points to fully realize the benefits of this priority

    Success can be dependent on your ability to address your pressure points.

    Attracting and Retaining Talent

    Shift focus from maintenance to innovation.

    Work on the most pressing and critical requests first, with a prioritization framework reflecting cross-functional priorities.

    Maximizing the Return on Technology

    Improve the reliability of mission-critical applications.

    Regularly verify and validate applications are up to date with the latest patches and fixes and comply with industry good practices and regulations.

    Confidently Shifting to Digital

    Prepare applications to support digital tools and technologies.

    Focus enhancements on the key components required to support the integration, performance, and security needs of digital.

    Addressing Competing Priorities

    Rationalize the health of the applications.

    Use data-driven, compelling insights to justify the direction and prioritization of applications initiatives.

    Fostering a Collaborative Culture

    Include the technical perspective in the viability of future applications plans.

    Demonstrate how poorly maintained applications impede the team's ability to deliver confidently and quickly.

    Creating High-Throughput Teams

    Simplify applications to ease delivery and maintenance.

    Refactor away application complexities and align the application portfolio to a common quality standard to reduce the effort to deliver and test changes.

    Recommendations

    Reinforce your application maintenance practice

    Maintenance is often viewed as a support function rather than an enabler of business growth. Focus and investments are only placed on maintenance when it becomes a problem.

    • Justify the necessity of streamlined maintenance.
    • Strengthen triaging and prioritization practices.
    • Establish and govern a repeatable process.

    Ensure product issues, incidents, defects, and change requests are promptly handled to minimize business and IT risks.

    Related Research:

    Build an application management practice

    Apply the appropriate management approaches to maintain business continuity and balance priorities and commitments among maintenance and new development requests.

    This practice serves as the foundation for creating exceptional customer experience by emphasizing cross-functional accountability for business value and product and service quality.

    Related Research:

    Recommendations

    Manage your technical debt

    Technical debt is a type of technical risk, which in turn is business risk. It's up to the business to decide whether to accept technical debt or mitigate it. Create a compelling argument to stakeholders as to why technical debt should be a business priority rather than just an IT one.

    • Define and identify your technical debt.
    • Conduct a business impact analysis.
    • Identify opportunities to better manage technical debt.

    Related Research:

    Gauge your application's health

    Application portfolio management is nearly impossible to perform without an honest and thorough understanding of your portfolio's alignment to business capabilities, business value, total cost of ownership, end-user reception and satisfaction, and technical health.

    Develop data-driven insights to help you decide which applications to retire, upgrade, retrain on, or maintain to meet the demands of the business.

    Related Research:

    Recommendations

    Adopt site reliability engineering (SRE) and DevOps practices

    Site reliability engineering (SRE) is an operational model for running online services more reliably by a team of dedicated reliability-focused engineers.

    DevOps, an operational philosophy promoting development and operations collaboration, can bring the critical insights to make application management practices through SRE more valuable.

    Related Research:

    CASE STUDY
    Government Agency

    Goal

    A government agency needed to implement a disciplined, sustainable application delivery, planning, and management process so their product delivery team could deliver features and changes faster with higher quality. The goal was to ensure change requests, fixes, and new features would relieve requester frustrations, reduce regression issues, and allow work to be done on agreeable and achievable priorities organization-wide. The new model needed to increase practice efficiency and visibility in order to better manage technical debt and focus on value-added solutions.

    Solution

    This organization recognized a number of key challenges that were inhibiting its team's ability to meet its goals:

    • The product backlog had become too long and unmanageable.
    • Delivery resources were not properly allocated to meet the skills and capabilities needed to successfully meet commitments.
    • Quality wasn't defined or enforced, which generated mounting technical debt.
    • There was a lack of clear metrics and defined roles and responsibilities.
    • The business had unrealistic and unachievable expectations.

    Source: Info-Tech Workshop

    Key practices implemented

    • Schedule quarterly business satisfaction surveys.
    • Structure and facilitate regular change advisory board meetings.
    • Define and enforce product quality standards.
    • Standardize a streamlined process with defined roles.
    • Configure management tools to better handle requests.

    Multisource Systems

    PRIORITY 4

    • Manage an Ecosystem Composed of In-House and Outsourced Systems

    Various market and company factors are motivating a review on resource and system sourcing strategies. The right sourcing model provides key skills, resources, and capabilities to meet innovation, time to market, financial, and quality goals of the business. However, organizations struggle with how best to support sourcing partners and to allocate the right number of resources to maximize success.

    Introduction

    A multisource system is an ecosystem of integrated internally and externally developed applications, data, and infrastructure. These technologies can be custom developed, heavily configured vendor solutions, or they may be commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) solutions. These systems can also be developed, supported, and managed by internal staff, in partnership with outsourced contractors, or be completely outsourced. Multisource systems should be configured and orchestrated in a way that maximizes the delivery of specific value drivers for the targeted audience.

    Successfully selecting a sourcing approach is not a simple RFP exercise to choose the lowest cost

    Defining and executing a sourcing approach can be a significant investment and risk because of the close interactions third-party services and partners will have with internal staff, enterprise applications and business capabilities. A careful selection and design is necessary.

    The selection of a sourcing partner is not simple. It involves the detailed inspection and examination of different candidates and matching their fit to the broader vision of the multisource system. In cases where control is critical, technology stack and resource sourcing consolidation to a few vendors and partners is preferred. In other cases, where worker productivity and system flexibility are highly prioritized, a plug-and-play best-of-breed approach is preferred.

    Typical factors involved in sourcing decisions.

    Sourcing needs to be driven by your department and system strategies

    How does the department want to be perceived?

    The image that your applications department and teams want to reflect is frequently dependent on the applications they deliver and support, the resources they are composed of, and the capabilities they provide.

    Therefore, choosing the right sourcing approach should be driven by understanding who the teams are and want to be (e.g. internal builder, an integrator, a plug-in player), what they can or want to do (e.g. custom-develop or implement), and what they can deliver or support (e.g. cloud or on-premises) must be established.

    What value is the system delivering?

    Well-integrated systems are the lifeblood of your organization. They provide the capabilities needed to deliver value to customers, employees, and stakeholders. However, underlying system components may not be sourced under a unified strategy, which can lead to duplicate vendor services and high operational costs.

    The right sourcing approach ensures your partners address key capabilities in your system's delivery and support, and that they are positioned to maximize the value of critical and high-impact components.

    Signals

    Business demand may outpace what vendors can support or offer

    Outsourcing and shifting to a buy-over-build applications strategy are common quick fixes to dealing with capacity and skills gaps. However, these quick fixes often become long-term implementations that are not accounted for in the sourcing selection process. Current application and resource sourcing strategies must be reviewed to ensure that vendor arrangements meet the current and upcoming demands and challenges of the business, customers, and enterprise technologies, such as:

    • Pressure from stakeholders to lower operating costs while maintaining or increasing quality and throughput.
    • Technology lock-in that addresses short-term needs but inhibits long-term growth and maturity.
    • Team capacity and talent acquisition not meeting the needs of the business.
    A circle graph is shown with 42% of the circle coloured in dark brown, with the number 42% in the centre.

    of respondents stated they outsourced software development fully or partly in the last 12 months (2021).

    Source: Coding Sans, 2021.

    A circle graph is shown with 65% of the circle coloured in dark brown, with the number 65% in the centre.

    of respondents stated they were at least somewhat satisfied with the result of outsourcing software development.

    Source: Coding Sans, 2021.

    Drivers

    Business-managed applications

    Employees are implementing and building applications without consulting, notifying, or heeding the advice of IT. IT is often ill-equipped and under-resourced to fight against shadow IT. Instead, organizations are shifting the mindset of "fight shadow IT" to "embrace business-managed applications," using good practices in managing multisource systems. A multisource approach strikes the right balance between user empowerment and centralized control with the solutions and architecture that can best enable it.

    Unique problems to solve

    Point solutions offer features to address unique use cases in uncommon technology environments. However, point solutions are often deployed in siloes with limited integration or overlap with other solutions. The right sourcing strategy accommodates the fragmented nature of point solutions into a broader enterprise system strategy, whether that be:

    • Multisource best of breed – integrate various technologies that provide subsets of the features needed for supporting business functions.
    • Multisource custom – integrate systems built in-house with technologies developed by external organizations.
    • Vendor add-ons and integrations – enhance an existing vendor's offering by using their system add-ons as upgrades, new add-ons, or integrations.

    Vendor services

    Some vendor services in a multisource environment may be redundant, conflicting, or incompatible. Given that multisource systems are regularly changing, it is difficult to identify what services are affected, what would be needed to fill the gap of the removed solution, or which redundant services should be removed.

    A multisource approach motivates the continuous rationalization of your vendor services and partners to determine the right mixture of in-house and outsourced resources, capabilities, and technologies.

    Benefits & Risks

    Benefits

    • Business-Focused Solution
    • Flexibility
    • Cost Optimization

    Multisource systems can be designed to support an employee's ability to select the tools they want and need.

    The environment is architected in a loosely coupled approach to allow applications to be easily added, removed, and modified with minimized impact to other integrated applications.

    Rather than investing in large solutions upfront, applications are adopted when they are needed and are removed when little value is gained. Disciplined application portfolio management is necessary to see the full value of this benefit.

    Risks

    • Manageable Sprawl
    • Policy Adherence
    • Integration & Compatibility

    The increased number and diversity of applications in multisource system environments can overwhelm system managers who do not have an effective application portfolio management practice.

    Fragmented application implementations risk inconsistent adherence to security and other quality policies, especially in situations where IT is not involved.

    Application integration can quickly become tangled, untraceable, and unmanageable because of varying team and vendor preferences for specific integration technologies and techniques.

    Address your pressure points to fully realize the benefits of this priority

    Success can be dependent on your ability to address your pressure points.

    Attracting and Retaining Talent

    Enable business-managed applications.

    Create the integrations to enable the easy connection of desired tools to enterprise systems with the appropriate guardrails.

    Maximizing the Return on Technology

    Enhance the functionality of existing applications.

    Complement current application capability gaps with data, features, and services from third-party applications.

    Confidently Shifting to Digital

    Use best-of-breed tools to meet specific digital needs.

    Select the best tools to meet the unique and special functional needs of the digital vision.

    Addressing Competing Priorities

    Agree on a common philosophy on system composition.

    Establish an owner of the multisource system to guide how the system should mature as the organization grows.

    Fostering a Collaborative Culture

    Discuss how applications can work together better in an ecosystem.

    Build committees to discuss how applications can better support each other and drive more value.

    Creating High-Throughput Teams

    Alleviate delivery bottlenecks and issues.

    Leverage third-party sources to fill skills and capacity gaps until a long-term solution can be implemented.

    Recommendations

    Define the goals of your applications department and product vision

    Understanding the applications team's purpose and image is critical in determining how the system they are managing and the skills and capacities they need should be sourced.

    Changing and conflicting definitions of value and goals make it challenging to convey an agreeable strategy of the multisource system. An achievable vision and practical tactics ensure all parties in the multisource system are moving in the same direction.

    Related Research:

    Develop a sourcing partner strategy

    Almost half of all sourcing initiatives do not realize projected savings, and the biggest reason is the choice of partner (Zhang et al., 2018). Making the wrong choice means inferior products, higher costs and the loss of both clients and reputation.

    Choosing the right sourcing partner involves understanding current skills and capacities, finding the right matching partner based on a desired profile, and managing a good working relationship that sees short-term gains and supports long-term goals.

    Related Research:

    Recommendations

    Strengthen enterprise integration practices

    Integration strategies that are focused solely on technology are likely to complicate rather than simplify because little consideration is given on how other systems and processes will be impacted. Enterprise integration needs to bring together business process, applications, and data – in that order.

    Kick-start the process of identifying opportunities for improvement by mapping how applications and data are coordinated to support business activities.

    Related Research:

    Manage your solution architecture and application portfolio

    Haphazardly implementing and integrating applications can generate significant security, performance, and data risks. A well-thought-through solution architecture is essential in laying the architecture quality principles and roadmap on how the multisource system can grow and evolve in a sustainable and maintainable way.

    Good application portfolio management complements the solution architecture as it indicates when low-value and unused applications should be removed to reduce system complexity.

    Related Research:

    Recommendations

    Embrace business-managed applications

    Multisource systems bring a unique opportunity to support the business and end users' desire to implement and develop their own applications. However, traditional models of managing applications may not accommodate the specific IT governance and management practices required to operate business-managed applications:

    • A collaborative and trusting business-IT relationship is key.
    • The role of IT must be reimagined.
    • Business must be accountable for its decisions.

    Related Research:

    CASE STUDY
    Cognizant

    Situation

    • Strives to be primarily an industry-aligned organization that delivers multiple service lines in multiple geographies.
    • Cognizant seeks to carefully consider client culture to create a one-team environment.
    • Value proposition is a consultative approach bringing thought leadership and mutually adding value to the relationship vs. the more traditional order-taker development partner.
    • Wants to share in solution development to facilitate shared successes. Geographic alignment drives knowledge of the client and their challenges, not just about time zone and supportability.
    • Offers one of the largest offshore capabilities in the world, supported by local and nearshore resources to drive local knowledge.
    • Today's clients don't typically want a black box, they are sophisticated and want transparency around the process and solution, to have a partner.
    • Clients do want to know where the work is being delivered from, how it's being done.

    Source: interview with Jay MacIsaac, Cognizant.

    Approach

    • Best relationship comes where teams operate as one.
    • Clients are seeking value, not a development black box.
    • Clients want to have a partner they can engage with, not just an order taker.
    • Want to build a one-team culture with shared goals and deliver business value.
    • Seek a partner that will add to their thinking not echo it.

    Results

    • Cognizant is continuing to deliver double-digit growth and continues to strive for top quartile performance.
    • Growth in the client base has seen the company grow to over 340,000 associates worldwide.

    Digital Organization as a Platform

    PRIORITY 5

    • Create a Common Digital Interface to Access All Products and Services

    A digital platform enables organizations to leverage a flexible, reliable, and scalable foundation to create a valuable DX, ease delivery and management efforts, maximize existing investments, and motivate the broader shift to digital. This approach provides a standard to architect, integrate, configure, and modernize the applications that compose the platform.

    Introduction

    What is digital organization as a platform (DOaaP)?

    Digital organization as a platform (DOaaP) is a collection of integrated digital services, products, applications, and infrastructure that is used as a vehicle to meet and exceed an organization's digital strategies. It often serves as an accessible "place for exchanges of information, goods, or services to occur between producers and consumers as well as the community that interacts
    with said platform" (Watts, 2020).

    DOaaP involves a strategy that paves the way for organizations to be digital. It helps organizations use their assets (e.g. data, processes, products, services) in the most effective ways and become more open to cooperative delivery, usage, and management. This opens opportunities for innovation and cross-department collaborations.

    How is DOaaP described?

    1. Open and Collaborative
      • Open organization: open data, open APIs, transparency, and user participation.
      • Collaboration, co-creation, crowdsourcing, and innovation
    2. Accessible and Connected
      • Digital inclusion
      • Channel ubiquity
      • Integrity and interoperability
      • Digital marketplace
    3. Digital and Programmable
      • Digital identity
      • Policies and processes as code
      • Digital products and services
      • Enabling digital platforms

    Digital organizations follow a common set of principles and practices

    Customer-centricity

    Digital organizations are driven by customer focus, meeting and exceeding customer expectations. It must design its services with a "digital first" principle, providing access through every expected channel and including seamless integration and interoperability with various departments, partners, and third-party services. It also means creating trust in its ability to provide secure services and to keep privacy and ethics as core pillars.

    Leadership, management, and strategies

    Digital leadership brings customer focus to the enterprise and its structures and organizes efficient networks and ecosystems. Accomplishing this means getting rid of silos and a siloed mentality and aligning on a digital vision to design policies and services that are efficient, cost-effective, and provide maximum benefit to the user. Asset sharing, co-creation, and being open and transparent become cornerstones of a digital organization.

    Infrastructure

    Providing digital services across demographics and geographies requires infrastructure, and that in turn requires long-term vision, smart investments, and partnerships with various source partners to create the necessary foundational infrastructure upon which to build digital services.

    Digitization and automation

    Automation and digitization of processes and services, as well as creating digital-first products, lead to increased efficiency and reach of the organization across demographics and geographies. Moreover, by taking a digital-first approach, digital organizations future-proof their services and demonstrate their commitment to stakeholders.

    Enabling platforms

    DOaaP embraces open standards, designing and developing organizational platforms and ecosystems with a cloud-first mindset and sound API strategies. Developer experience must also take center stage, providing the necessary tools and embracing Agile and DevOps practices and culture become prerequisites. Cybersecurity and privacy are central to the digital platform; hence they must be part of the design and development principles and practices.

    Signals

    The business expects support for digital products and services

    Digital transformation continues to be a high-priority initiative for many organizations, and they see DOaaP as an effective way to enable and exploit digital capabilities. However, DOaaP unleashes new strategies, opportunities, and challenges that are elusive or unfamiliar to business leaders. Barriers in current business operating models may limit DOaaP success, such as:

    • Department and functional silos
    • Dispersed, fragmented and poor-quality data
    • Ill-equipped and under-skilled resources to support DOaaP adoption
    • System fragmentation and redundancies
    • Inconsistent integration tactics employed across systems
    • Disjointed user experience leading to low engagement and adoption

    DOaaP is not just about technology, and it is not the sole responsibility of either IT or business. It is the collective responsibility of the organization.

    A circle graph is shown with 47% of the circle coloured in dark blue, with the number 47% in the centre.

    of organizations plan to unlock new value through digital. 50% of organizations are planning major transformation over the next three years.

    Source: Nash Squared, 2022.

    A circle graph is shown with 70% of the circle coloured in dark blue, with the number 70% in the centre.

    of organizations are undertaking digital expansion projects focused on scaling their business with technology. This result is up from 57% in 2021.

    Source: F5 Inc, 2022.

    Drivers

    Unified brand and experience

    Users should have the same experience and perception of a brand no matter what product or service they use. However, fragmented implementation of digital technologies and inconsistent application of design standards makes it difficult to meet this expectation. DOaaP embraces a single design and DX standard for all digital products and services, which creates a consistent perception of your organization's brand and reputation irrespective of what products and services are being used and how they are accessed.

    Accessibility

    Rapid advancement of end-user devices and changes to end-user behaviors and expectations often outpace an organization's ability to meet these requirements. This can make certain organization products and services difficult to find, access and leverage. DOaaP creates an intuitive and searchable interface to all products and services and enables the strategic combination of technologies to collectively deliver more value.

    Justification for modernization

    Many opportunities are left off the table when legacy systems are abstracted away rather than modernized. However, legacy systems may not justify the investment in modernization because their individual value is outweighed by the cost. A DOaaP initiative motivates decision makers to look at the entire system (i.e. modern and legacy) to determine which components need to be brought up to a minimum digital state. The conversation has now changed. Legacy systems should be modernized to increase the collective benefit of the entire DOaaP.

    Benefits & Risks

    Benefits

    • Look & Feel
    • User Adoption
    • Shift to Digital

    A single, modern, customizable interface enables a common look and feel no matter what and how the platform is being accessed.

    Organizations can motivate and encourage the adoption and use of all products and services through the platform and increase the adoption of underused technologies.

    DOaaP motivates and supports the modernization of data, processes, and systems to meet the goals and objectives outlined in the broader digital transformation strategy.

    Risks

    • Data Quality
    • System Stability
    • Ability to Modernize
    • Business Model Change

    Each system may have a different definition of commonly used entities (e.g. customer), which can cause data quality issues when information is shared among these systems.

    DOaaP can stress the performance of underlying systems due to the limitations of some systems to handle increased traffic.

    Some systems cannot be modernized due to cost constraints, business continuity risks, vendor lock-in, legacy and lore, or other blocking factors.

    Limited appetite to make the necessary changes to business operations in order to maximize the value of DOaaP technologies.

    Address your pressure points to fully realize the benefits of this priority

    Success can be dependent on your ability to address your pressure points.

    Attracting and Retaining Talent Promote and showcase achievements and successes. Share the valuable and innovative work of your teams across the organization and with the public.
    Maximizing the Return on Technology Increase visibility of underused applications. Promote the adoption and use of all products and services through the platform and use the lessons learned to justify removal, updates or modernizations.
    Confidently Shifting to Digital Bring all applications up to a common digital standard. Define the baseline digital state all applications, data, and processes must be in to maximize the value of the platform.
    Addressing Competing Priorities Map to a holistic platform vision, goals and objectives. Work with relevant stakeholders, teams and end users to agree on a common directive considering all impacted perspectives.
    Fostering a Collaborative Culture Ensure the platform is configured to meet the individual needs of the users. Tailor the interface and capabilities of the platform to address users' functional and personal concerns.
    Creating High-Throughput Teams Abstract the enterprise system to expedite delivery. Use the platform to standardize application system access to simplify platform changes and quicken development and testing.

    Recommendations

    Define your platform vision

    Organizations realize that a digital model is the way to provide more effective services to their customers and end users in a cost-effective, innovative, and engaging fashion. DOaaP is a way to help support this transition.

    However, various platform stakeholders will have different interpretations of and preferences for what this platform is intended to solve, what benefits it is supposed to deliver, and what capabilities it will deliver. A grounded vision is imperative to steer the roadmap and initiatives.

    Related Research:

    Assess and modernize your applications

    Certain applications may not sufficiently support the compatibility, flexibility, and efficiency requirements of DOaaP. While workaround technologies and tactics can be employed to overcome these application challenges, the full value of the DOaaP may not be realized.

    Reviewing the current state of the application portfolio will indicate the functional and value limitations of what DOaaP can provide and an indication of the scope of investment needed to bring applications up to a minimum state.

    Related Research:

    Recommendations

    Understand and evaluate end-user needs

    Technology has reached a point where it's no longer difficult for teams to build functional and valuable digital platforms. Rather, the difficulty lies in creating an interface and platform that people want to use and use frequently.

    While it is important to increase the access and promotion of all products and services, orchestrating and configuring them in a way to deliver a satisfying experience is even more important. Applications teams must first learn about and empathize with the needs of end users.

    Related Research:

    Architect your platform

    Formalizing and constructing DOaaP just for the sake of doing so often results in an initiative that is lengthy and costly and ends up being considered a failure.

    The build and optimization of the platform must be predicated on a thorough understanding of the DOaaP's goals, objectives, and priorities and the business capabilities and process they are meant to support and enable. The appropriate architecture and delivery practices can then be defined and employed.

    Related Research:

    CASE STUDY
    e-Estonia

    Situation

    The digital strategy of Estonia resulted in e-Estonia, with the vision of "creating a society with more transparency, trust, and efficiency." Estonia has addressed the challenge by creating structures, organizations, and a culture of innovation, and then using the speed and efficiency of digital infrastructure, apps, and services. This strategy can reduce or eliminate bureaucracy through transparency and automation.

    Estonia embarked on its journey to making digital a priority in 1994-1996, focusing on a committed investment in infrastructure and digital literacy. With that infrastructure in place, they started providing digital services like an e-banking service (1996), e-tax and mobile parking (2002), and then went full steam ahead with a digital information interoperability platform in 2001, digital identity in 2002, e-health in 2008, and e-prescription in 2010. The government is now strategizing for AI.

    Results

    This image contains the results of the e-Estonia case study results

    Source: e-Estonia

    Practices employed

    The e-Estonia digital government model serves as a reference for governments across the world; this is acknowledged by the various awards it has received, like #2 in "internet freedom," awarded by Freedom House in 2019; #1 on the "digital health index," awarded by the Bertelsmann Foundation in 2019; and #1 on "start-up friendliness," awarded by Index Venture in 2018.

    References

    "15th State of Agile Report." Digital.ai, 2021. Web.
    "2022 HR Trends Report." McLean & Company, 2022.
    "2022: State of Application Strategy Report." F5 Inc, 2022.
    "Are Executives Wearing Rose-Colored Glasses Around Digital Transformation?" Cyara, 2021. Web.
    "Cost of a Data Breach Report 2022." IBM, 2022. Web.
    Dalal, Vishal, et al. "Tech Debt: Reclaiming Tech Equity." McKinsey Digital, Oct. 2020. Web.
    "Differentiating Between Intelligent Automation and Hyperautomation." IBM, 15 October 2021. Web.
    "Digital Leadership Report 2021." Harvey Nash Group, 2021.
    "Digital Leadership Report 2022: The State of Digital." Nash Squared, 2022. Web.
    Gupta, Sunil. "Driving Digital Strategy: A Guide to Reimagining Your Business." Harvard Business Review Press, 2018. Web.
    Haff, Gordon. "State of Application Modernization Report 2022." Konveyor, 2022. Web.
    "IEEE Standard for Software Maintenance: IEEE Std 1219-1998." IEEE Standard for Software Maintenance, 1998. Accessed Dec. 2015.
    "Intelligent Automation." Cognizant, n.d. Web.
    "Kofax 2022: Intelligent Automation Benchmark Study". Kofax, 2021. Web.
    McCann, Leah. "Barco's Virtual Classroom at UCL: A Case Study for the Future of All University Classrooms?" rAVe, 2 July 2020, Web.
    "Proactive Staffing and Patient Prioritization to Decompress ED and Reduce Length of Stay." University Hospitals, 2018. Web.
    "Secrets of Successful Modernization." looksoftware, 2013. Web.
    "State of Software Development." Coding Sans, 2021. Web.
    "The State of Low-Code/No-Code." Creatio, 2021. Web.
    "We Have Built a Digital Society and We Can Show You How." e-Estonia. n.d. Web.
    Zanna. "The 5 Types of Experience Series (1): Brand Experience Is Your Compass." Accelerate in Experience, 9 February 2020. Web.
    Zhang, Y. et al. "Effects of Risks on the Performance of Business Process Outsourcing Projects: The Moderating Roles of Knowledge Management Capabilities." International Journal of Project Management, 2018, vol. 36 no. 4, 627-639.

    Research Contributors and Experts

    This is a picture of Chris Harrington

    Chris Harrington
    Chief Technology Officer
    Carolinas Telco Federal Credit Union

    Chris Harrington is Chief Technology Officer (CTO) of Carolinas Telco Federal Credit Union. Harrington is a proven leader with over 20 years of experience developing and leading information technology and cybersecurity strategies and teams in the financial industry space.

    This is a picture of Benjamin Palacio

    Benjamin Palacio
    Senior Information Technology Analyst County of Placer

    Benjamin Palacio has been working in the application development space since 2007 with a strong focus on system integrations. He has seamlessly integrated applications data across multiple states into a single reporting solution for management teams to evaluate, and he has codeveloped applications to manage billions in federal funding. He is also a CSAC-credentialed IT Executive (CA, USA).

    This is a picture of Scott Rutherford

    Scott Rutherford
    Executive Vice President, Technology
    LGM Financial Services Inc.

    Scott heads the Technology division of LGM Financial Services Inc., a leading provider of warranty and financing products to automotive OEMs and dealerships in Canada. His responsibilities include strategy and execution of data and analytics, applications, and technology operations.

    This is a picture of Robert Willatts

    Robert Willatts
    IT Manager, Enterprise Business Solutions and Project Services
    Town of Newmarket

    Robert is passionate about technology, innovation, and Smart City Initiatives. He makes customer satisfaction as the top priority in every one of his responsibilities and accountabilities as an IT manager, such as developing business applications, implementing and maintaining enterprise applications, and implementing technical solutions. Robert encourages communication, collaboration, and engagement as he leads and guides IT in the Town of Newmarket.

    This is a picture of Randeep Grewal

    Randeep Grewal
    Vice President, Enterprise Applications
    Red Hat

    Randeep has over 25 years of experience in enterprise applications, advanced analytics, enterprise data management, and consulting services, having worked at numerous blue-chip companies. In his most recent role, he is the Vice President of Enterprise Applications at Red Hat. Reporting to the CIO, he is responsible for Red Hat's core business applications with a focus on enterprise transformation, application architecture, engineering, and operational excellence. He previously led the evolution of Red Hat into a data-led company by maturing the enterprise data and analytics function to include data lake, streaming data, data governance, and operationalization of analytics for decision support.

    Prior to Red Hat, Randeep was the director of global services strategy at Lenovo, where he led the strategy using market data to grow Lenovo's services business by over $400 million in three years. Prior to Lenovo, Randeep was the director of advanced analytics at Alliance One and helped build an enterprise data and analytics function. His earlier work includes seven years at SAS, helping SAS become a leader in business analytics, and at KPMG consulting, where he managed services engagements at Fortune 100 companies.

    Social Media Management Software Selection Guide

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}570|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Marketing Solutions
    • Parent Category Link: /marketing-solutions
    • Social media has changed the way businesses interact with their customers. It is essential to engage with your customers regularly and in a timely manner.
    • Businesses must stay on top of the latest news and update the public regarding the status of downtime or any mishaps.
    • Customers are present in multiple social media platforms, and it is important for businesses to engage with all audiences without alienating one group.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • There are many social media platforms, and any post, image, or other content must be uploaded on all the platforms with minimal delay.
    • It is often difficult to manage replies and responses to all social media platforms promptly.
    • Measuring key performance metrics is crucial to obtain targeted ROI. Calculating ROI across multiple platforms with various audiences is a challenge.

    Impact and Result

    • A business’ social media presence is an extension of the organization, and the social media management strategy must align with the organization's values.
    • Choose a social media management platform that is right for you by aligning your needs without falling for bells and whistles. Vendors offer a lot of features that are not helpful for most day-to-day activities.
    • Ensure the social media management platform has support and integrations for all the platforms that you require.

    Social Media Management Software Selection Guide Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Social Media Management Software Selection Guide – A deck outlining the features of SMMP tools and top vendors in the marketspace.

    This research offers insight into web analytic tools, key trends in the marketspace, and advanced web analytics techniques. It also provides an overview of the ten top vendors in the marketspace.

    • Social Media Management Software Selection Guide Storyboard
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Social Media Management Software Selection Guide

    Identify the best tools for your social media management needs.

    Analyst Perspective

    Connecting through social media is an essential way to understand and engage with your customers.

    Social media management platforms (SMMP) allow businesses to engage with customers more efficiently. Ten years ago, Facebook and Twitter dominated the social media space, but many alternatives have emerged that attract a wide variety of audiences today. Every social media platform has a unique demographic; for instance, LinkedIn attracts an audience looking to develop their professional career, while Snapchat attracts those who want to share their everyday casual experience.

    It is important for businesses and brands to engage with all kinds of audiences without alienating a certain group. Domino's, for example, can sell pizzas to business professionals and teenagers alike, so connecting with both customer segments via personalized and meaningful posts in their preferred platform is a great way to grow their business.

    To successfully implement a social media management platform, organizations need to ensure they have their requirements and business needs shortlisted and choose vendors that ensure the best return on investment (ROI).

    An image of Sai Krishna Rajaramagopalan
    Sai Krishna Rajaramagopalan
    Research Specialist, Customer Experience & Application Insights
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    • Social media has changed the way businesses interact with customers. It is essential to engage with your them regularly and in a timely manner.
    • Businesses must stay on top of the latest news and update the public regarding any downtime or mishaps.
    • Customers are present on multiple social media platforms, and businesses need to engage all audiences without neglecting or alienating any one group.

    Common Obstacles

    • There are many social media platforms, and any post, image, or other content must be uploaded on every platform with minimal delay.
    • It is often difficult to manage audience interaction on all social media platforms in a timely manner.
    • Measuring key performance metrics is crucial to obtaining the targeted ROI. Calculating ROI across multiple platforms with varying audiences is a challenge.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    • Social media presence is an extension of the organization, and the social media management strategy must align with organizational values.
    • Understand your feature requirements and don't for bells and whistles. Vendors offer many features that are not helpful during 80% of day-to-day activities. Choose the SMMP that is right for your organization's needs.
    • Ensure the SMMP has support and integrations for all the platforms that you require.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Choosing a good SMMP is only the first step. Having great social media managers who understand their audience is essential in maintaining a healthy relationship with your audience.

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Phase 1 Phase 2

    Call #1: Understand what a social media management platform (SMMP) is.
    Call #2: Build the business case to select an SMMP.

    Call #3: Define your key SMMP requirements.
    Call #4: Build procurement items, such as a request for proposal (RFP).
    Call #5: Evaluate the SMMP solution landscape and shortlist viable options.

    A Guided implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    The SMMP selection process should be broken into segments:

    1. SMMP shortlisting with this buyer's guide
    2. Structured approach to selection
    3. Contract review

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    “Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

    Workshop

    “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

    Consulting

    “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    What exactly is an SMMP platform?

    A social media management platform is a software solution that enables businesses and brands to manage multiple social media accounts. It facilitates making posts, monitoring metrics, and engaging with your audience.

    An SMMP platform offers many key features, including but not limited to the following capabilities:

    • Integrate with popular social media platforms
    • Post images, text, videos on multiple platforms at once
    • Schedule posts
    • Track and monitor activity on social media accounts
    • Send replies and view likes and comments across all accounts
    • Reporting and analytics
    • Send alerts and notifications regarding key events
    • Multilingual support and translation

    Info-Tech Insight

    Social media management platforms have continuously expanded their features list. It is, however, essential not to get lost in endless features to remain competitive and ensure the best ROI.

    Key trends – short-form videos drive the most engagement

    Short-form videos

    Short-form videos are defined as videos less than two minutes long. Shorter videos take substantially less time and effort to consume, making them very attractive for marketing brands to end users. According to a study conducted by Vidyard, more than 50% of viewers end up watching an entire video if it's less than one minute. Another study finds that over 93% of the surveyed brands sold their product or service to a customer through a social media video.

    Popular social media platforms such as TikTok, Instagram, YouTube etc. have caught on to this trend and introduced short-form videos, more commonly called "shorts". It's also common for content creators and brands to cut and upload short clips from longer videos to drive more engagement with viewers.

    Key Trends

    Short-form videos have higher viewership and view time compared to long videos.

    58%

    About 58% of viewers watch the video to the end if it’s under one minute long. A two-minute video manages to keep around 50% of its viewers till the end.
    Source: Oberlo, 2020

    30%

    Short-form videos have the highest ROI of any social media marketing at 30%.
    Source: Influencer Marketing Hub, 2023

    Key trends – influencer marketing

    Influencer marketing

    Influencer marketing is the collaboration of brands with online influencers and content creators across various social media platforms to market their products and services. Influencers are not necessarily celebrities; they can be any individual with a dedicated community. This makes influencers abundant. For instance, compare the number of popular football players with the number of YouTubers on the planet.

    Unlike traditional marketing methods, influencer marketing is effective across different budget levels. This is because the engagement level of small influencers with 10,000 followers is higher than the engagement level of large influencers with millions of followers. If a brand is budget conscious, working with smaller influencers still gives a good ROI. For every dollar spent on influencer marketing, the average ROI is $5.78.

    Key Trends

    61%

    A recent study by Matter found that 61% of consumers trust influencers' recommendations over branded social media content.
    Source: Shopify, 2022

    According to data gathered by Statista, the influencer marketing industry has more than doubled since 2019. It was worth $16.4 billion in 2022.
    Source: Statista, 2023

    Executive Brief Case Study

    INDUSTRY: Retail
    SOURCE: "5 Influencer Marketing Case Studies," HubSpot

    H&M

    H&M was looking to build awareness and desirability around the brand to drive clothing sales during the holiday season. They decided to partner with influencers and align content with each celebrity's personality and lifestyle to create authentic content and messaging for H&M. H&M selected four lesser-known celebrities with highly engaged and devoted social media followings: Tyler Posey, Peyton List, Jana Kramer, and Hannah Simone.

    They posted teaser clips across various platforms to create buzz about the campaign a couple of days before the full, one-minute videos were released. Presenting the content two different times enabled H&M to appeal to more viewers and increase the campaign's visibility. Two of the celebrities, List and Kramer, garnered more views and engagement on the short clip than the full video, highlighting that a great short clip can be more effective than long-form content.

    Results

    The campaign achieved 12 million views on YouTube, 1.3 million likes, 14,000 comments, and 19,000 shares. The average engagement with consumers across all four celebrities was 10%.

    A screenshot of Tyler Posey's sponsored video.

    Tyler Posey's sponsored video achieved:

    • 25% engagement rate on Instagram
    • 14% engagement rate across Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram

    Key trends – social commerce is the future of e-commerce

    Social commerce

    Social commerce is the selling of goods and services through social media. This may involve standalone stores on social media platforms or promotions on these platforms which link to traditional e-commerce platforms.

    Social media platforms contain more data about consumers than traditional platforms, which allows more accurate targeting of ads and promotions. Additionally, social commerce can place ads on popular influencer stories and posts, taking advantage of influencer marketing without directly involving the influencers.

    Popular platforms have opened their own built-in stores. Facebook created Marketplace and Facebook Shops. TikTok soon followed with the TikTok Shopping suite. These stores allow platforms to lower third-party costs and have more control over which products are featured. This also creates a transactional call to action without leaving social media.

    Key Trends

    2020 saw a sizable increase in social commerce occurring on social media networks, with users making purchases directly from their social accounts.

    30.8%

    Sales through social commerce are expected to grow about 30.8% per year from 2020 to 2025. The growth rate is expected to increase to 35% in 2026.
    Source: Oberlo, 2020

    46%

    China has the highest social commerce adoption rate in the world, with 46% of all internet users making at least one purchase. The US is second with a 36% adoption rate.
    Source: Influencer Marketing Hub, 2022

    Executive Brief Case Study

    BestBuy

    The Twitter Shop Module allows select brands to showcase products at the top of Twitter business profiles. Users can scroll through a carousel of products on a brand's profile and tap on individual products to read more and make purchases without leaving the platform.

    While the results of Twitter's Shop Module experiment are still pending, brands aren't waiting around to sell on the platform. Best Buy and others continue to link to well-formatted product pages directly in their Tweets.

    Clear, direct calls to action such as "Pick yours up today" encourage interested audiences to click through, learn more, and review options for purchase. In this social commerce example, Best Buy also makes optimal use of a Tweet's character limit. In just a few words, the brand offers significant savings for a high-quality product, then doubles down with a promotional trade-in offer. Strong imagery is the icing on the cake.

    INDUSTRY: Retail
    SOURCE: "5 genius social commerce examples," Sprout Social, 2021

    Image shows a social media post by Best Buy.

    Key trends – social media risk management is crucial

    Crisis management

    Crisis management is the necessary intervention from an organization when negative news spreads across social media platforms. With how interconnected people are due to social media, news can quickly spread across different platforms.

    Organizations must be prepared for difficult situations such as negative feedback for a product or service, site outages, real-world catastrophes or disasters, and negative comments toward the social media handle. There are tools that organizations can use to receive real-time updates and be prepared for extreme situations.

    While the causes are often beyond control, organizations can prepare by setting up a well-constructed crisis management strategy.

    Key Trends

    75%

    75% of respondents to PwC's Global Crisis Survey said technology has facilitated the coordination of their organization's crisis response team.
    Source: PwC, 2021

    69%

    69% of business leaders reported experiencing a crisis over a period of five years, with the average number of crises being three.
    Source: PwC, 2019

    Executive Brief Case Study

    INDUSTRY: Apparel
    SOURCE: “Social Media Crisis Management 3 Examples Done Right,” Synthesio

    Nike

    On February 20, 2019, Zion Williamson, a star player from Duke University, suffered a knee injury when a malfunctioning Nike shoe fell apart. This accident happened less than a minute into a highly anticipated game against North Carolina. Media outlets and social media users quickly began talking. ESPN had broadcast the game nationally. On Twitter, former President Barack Obama, who was watching the game courtside, expressed his well-wishes to Williamson, as did NBA giants like LeBron James.

    This accident was so high profile that Nike stock dropped 1.7% the following day. Nike soon released a statement expressing its concern and well-wishes for Williamson. The footwear megabrand reassured the world that its teams were "working to identify the issue." The following day, Nike sent a team to Durham, North Carolina, where the game took place. This team then visited Nike's manufacturing site in China and returned with numerous suggestions.

    About a month later, Williamson returned to the court with custom shoes, which he told reporters were "incredible." He thanked Nike for creating them.

    An image of a post by Time about Zion Williamson's injury.

    Get to know the key players in the SMMP landscape

    These next slides provide a top-level overview of the popular players you will encounter in the SMMP shortlisting process.

    A collection of the logos for the SMPP key players, discussed later in this blueprint.

    Evaluate software category leaders through vendor rankings and awards

    SoftwareReviews

    An Image of SoftwareReviews data quadrant analysis

    The data quadrant is a thorough evaluation and ranking of all software in an individual category to compare platforms across multiple dimensions.
    Vendors are ranked by their composite score, based on individual feature evaluations, user satisfaction rankings, vendor capability comparisons, and likeliness to recommend the platform.

    An image of SoftwareReviews Emotional Footprint.

    The emotional footprint is a powerful indicator of overall user sentiment toward the relationship with the vendor, capturing data across five dimensions.
    Vendors are ranked by their customer experience (CX) score, which combines the overall emotional footprint rating with a measure of the value delivered by the solution.

    Speak with category experts to dive deeper into the vendor landscape

    SoftwareReviews

    CLICK HERE to ACCESS

    Comprehensive software reviews

    to make better IT decisions

    We collect and analyze the most detailed reviews on enterprise software from real users to give you an unprecedented view into the product and vendor before you buy.

    Fact-based reviews of business software from IT professionals.

    Product and category reports with state-of-the-art data visualization.

    Top-tier data quality backed by a rigorous quality assurance process.

    User-experience insight that reveals the intangibles of working with a vendor.

    SoftwareReviews is powered by Info-Tech

    Technology coverage is a priority for Info-Tech and SoftwareReviews provides the most comprehensive unbiased data on today's technology. Combined with the insight of our expert analysts, our members receive unparalleled support in their buying journey.

    The logo for HubSpot

    Est. 2006 | MA, USA | NYSE: HUBS

    bio

    From attracting visitors to closing customers, HubSpot brings the entire marketing funnel together for less hassle, more control, and an inbound marketing strategy.

    An image of SoftwareReviews analysis for HubSpot

    SoftwareReviews' SMMP Rankings

    Strengths:

    • Extensive functionality
    • Great for midmarket and large enterprises
    • Offers free trial

    Areas to improve:

    • Comparatively expensive
    • Steep price increase between various tiers of offering

    The logo for HubSpot

    *Pricing correct as of November 2022. Listed in USD and absent discounts.
    See pricing on vendor's website for latest information.

    HubSpot offers a robust social media management platform that enables organizations to run all social media campaigns from a central location. HubSpot is suitable for a range of midmarket and enterprise use cases. HubSpot offers a free base version of the platform that freelancers and start-ups can take advantage of. The free version can also be used to trial the product prior to deciding on purchase.

    However, HubSpot is relatively expensive compared to its competitors. The free tools are not sustainable for growing businesses and some essential features are locked behind professional pricing. The price increase from one tier to another – specifically from starter to professional – is steep, which may discourage organizations looking for a "cheap and cheerful" product.

    History

    An image of the timeline for HubSpot

    Starter

    • Starts at $45
    • Per month
    • Small businesses

    Professional

    • Starts at $800
    • Per month
    • Medium/large businesses

    Enterprise

    • Starts at $3600
    • Per month
    • Large enterprises

    The logo for Sprout Social

    Est. 2010 | IL, USA | NASDAQ: SPT

    bio

    People increasingly turn to social media to engage with your business. Sprout Social provides powerful tools to personally connect with customers, solve issues, and create brand advocates.

    An image of SoftwareReviews analysis for Sprout Social

    SoftwareReviews' SMMP Rankings

    Strengths:

    • Automated response feature
    • Great price for base offering

    Areas to improve:

    • Advanced features are very expensive
    • No free trial offered

    The logo for Sprout Social

    *Pricing correct as of November 2022. Listed in USD and absent discounts.
    See pricing on vendor's website for latest information.

    Sprout Social offers strong social feed management and social customer service capabilities. It also provides powerful analytical tools to monitor multiple social media accounts. The listening functionality helps discover trends and identify gaps and opportunities. It is also one of the very few platforms to provide automated responses to incoming communications, easing the process of managing large and popular brands.

    Although the starting price of each tier is competitive, advanced analytics and listening come at a steep additional cost. Adding one additional user to the professional tier costs $299 which is a 75% increase in cost. Sprout Social does not offer a free tier for small businesses to trial.

    History

    An image of the timeline for Sprout Social

    Standard

    • Starts at $249
    • Per month
    • Small businesses
    • Five social profiles

    Professional

    • Starts at $399
    • Per month
    • Medium/large businesses

    Advanced

    • Starts at $499
    • Per month
    • Medium/large businesses

    Enterprise

    • Opaque pricing
    • Request a quote
    • Large enterprises

    The logo for Hootsuite

    Est. 2008 | BC, CANADA |PRIVATE

    bio

    Manage social networks, schedule messages, engage your audiences, and measure ROI right from the dashboard.

    SoftwareReviews' SMMP Rankings

    Strengths:

    • Automatic scheduling functionality
    • Competitor analysis
    • 30-day free trial

    Areas to improve:

    • Advanced functionalities require additional purchase and are expensive

    The logo for Hootsuite

    *Pricing correct as of November 2022. Listed in USD and absent discounts.
    See pricing on vendor's website for latest information.

    Hootsuite is one of the largest players in the social media management space with over 18 million users. The solution has great functionality covering all the popular social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and Pinterest. One popular and well-received feature is the platform’s ability to schedule posts in bulk. Hootsuite also provides an automatic scheduling feature that uses algorithms to determine the optimal time to post to maximize viewership and engagement. Additionally, the platform can pull analytics for all competitors in the same marketspace as the user to compare performance.

    Hootsuite offers buyers a 30-day free trial to familiarize with the platform and provides unlimited post scheduling across all their plans. Features like social listening, employee advocacy, and ROI reporting, however, are not included in these plans and require additional purchase.

    History

    An image of the timeline for Hootsuite

    Professional

    • Starts at $49*
    • Per month
    • 1 user and 10 social accounts

    Team

    • Starts at $249*
    • Per month
    • 3 users and 20 social accounts

    Business

    • Starts at $739*
    • Per month
    • 5 users and 35 social accounts

    Enterprise

    • Custom built and priced
    • Starts at 5 users and 50 social accounts

    The logo for Sprinklr

    Est. 2009 | NY, USA | NYSE: CXM

    bio

    With social engagement & sales, you can deliver a positive experience that's true to your brand - no matter where your customers are digitally - from a single, unified platform.

    An image of SoftwareReviews analysis for Sprinklr

    SoftwareReviews' SMMP Rankings

    Strengths

    • Extensive social analytics functionality
    • Advertising and sales capabilities

    Areas to improve:

    • Not suitable for small to medium businesses
    • Opaque pricing

    The logo for Sprinklr

    Sprinklr is a vendor focused on enterprise-grade capabilities that offers a comprehensive unified customer experience management (CXM) platform.

    Their product portfolio offers an all-in-one solution set with an extensive list of features to accommodate all marketing and communication needs. Sprinklr comes integrated with products consisting of advertising, marketing, engagement, and sales capabilities. Some of the key functionality specific to social media includes sentiment analysis, social reporting, advanced data filtering, alerts and notifications, competitor analysis, post performance, and hashtag analysis.

    History

    An image of the timeline for Sprinklr

    Sprinklr – Opaque Pricing:
    "Request a Demo"

    The logo for Zoho Social

    Est. 1996 | TN, INDIA | PRIVATE

    bio

    Zoho Social is a complete social media management tool for growing businesses & agencies. It helps schedule posts, monitor mentions, create unlimited reports, and more. Zoho Social is from Zoho.com—a suite of 40+ products trusted by 30+ million users.

    An image of SoftwareReviews analysis for Zoho Social” data-verified=

    SoftwareReviews' SMMP Rankings

    Strengths:

    • Provides integration capabilities with other Zoho products
    • Competitive pricing

    Areas to improve:

    • Base functionality is limited
    • The two starting tiers are limited to one user

    The logo for Zoho Social

    *Pricing correct as of August 2021. Listed in USD and absent discounts.
    See pricing on vendor's website for latest information.

    Zoho differentiates itself from competitors by highlighting integration with other products under the Zoho umbrella – their adjacent tool sets allow organizations to manage emails, projects, accounts, and webinars. Zoho also offers the choice of purchasing their social media management tool without any of the augmented CRM capabilities, which is priced quite competitively.

    The social media management tools are offered in three plans. Each plan allows the ability to publish and schedule posts across nine platforms, access summary reports and analytics, and access a Bit.ly integration & URL shortener. The standard and professional plans are limited to one brand and one team member, with the option to add team members or social channels for an additional cost.

    YouTube support is exclusive to the premium offering.

    History

    An image of the timeline for Zoho Social

    Standard

    • Starts at $10*
    • Per month, billed annually
    • 9 channels and 1 team member

    Professional

    • Starts at $30*
    • Per month, billed annually
    • Option to add team members for additional cost

    Premium

    • Starts at $40*
    • Per month, billed annually
    • Starts at 10 channels and 3 team members

    The logo for MavSocial

    Est. 2012 | CA, USA | PRIVATE

    bio

    MavSocial is a multi-award-winning, fully integrated social media management & advertising solution for brands and agencies.

    An image of SoftwareReviews analysis for MavSocial

    SoftwareReviews' SMMP Rankings

    Strengths

    • Content management capabilities
    • Offers millions of stock free images

    Areas to improve:

    • Limited market footprint compared to competitors
    • Not ideal for large enterprises

    The logo for MavSocial

    *Pricing correct as of November 2022. Listed in USD and absent discounts.
    See pricing on vendor's website for latest information.

    In addition to social media management, MavSocial is also an excellent content management tool. A centralized platform is offered that can store many photos, videos, infographics, and more, which can be accessed anytime. The solution comes with millions of free stock images to use. MavSocial is a great hybrid social media and content management solution for small and mid-sized businesses and larger brands that have dedicated teams to manage their social media. MavSocial also offers campaign planning and management, scheduling, and social inbox functionality. The entry-level plan starts at $78 per month for three users and 30 profiles. The enterprise plan offers fully configurable and state-of-the-art social media management tools, including the ability to manage Facebook ads.

    History

    An image of the timeline for MavSocial

    Pro

    • Starts at $78*
    • Per month
    • Max. 3 users and 30 Profiles

    Business

    • Starts at $249*
    • Per month
    • 5 users, 40 profiles
    • Ability to expand users and profiles

    Enterprise

    • Starts at $499*
    • Per month
    • Fully customized

    The logo for Khoros

    Est. 2019 | TX, USA | PRIVATE

    bio

    Use the Khoros platform (formerly Spredfast + Lithium) to deliver an all-ways connected experience your customers deserve.

    An image of SoftwareReviews analysis for Khoros

    SoftwareReviews' SMMP Rankings

    Strengths

    • Offers a dedicated social strategic service team
    • Extensive functionality

    Areas to improve:

    • Opaque pricing
    • Not suitable for small or medium businesses

    The logo for Khoros

    Khoros is the result of the merger between two social marketing platforms - Spredfast and Lithium. The parent companies have over a decade of experience offering social management tools. Khoros is widely used among many large brands such as StarHub and Randstad. Khoros is another vendor that is primarily focused on large enterprises and does not offer plans for small/medium businesses. Khoros offers a broad range of functionality such as social media marketing, customer engagement, and brand protection with visibility and controls over social media presence. Khoros also offers a social strategic services team to manage content strategy, brand love, reporting, trend tracking, moderation, crisis and community management; this team can be full service or a special ops extension of your in-house crew.

    History

    An image of the timeline for Khoros

    Khoros – Opaque Pricing:
    "Request a Demo"

    The logo for Sendible

    Est. 2009 | UK | PRIVATE

    bio

    Sendible allows you to manage social networks, schedule messages, engage your audiences, and measure ROI right from one easy-to-use dashboard.

    An image of SoftwareReviews analysis for Sendible

    SoftwareReviews' SMMP Rankings

    Strengths

    • Great integration capabilities
    • Competitive pricing
    • Scheduling functionality

    Areas to improve:

    • Limited footprint compared to competitors
    • Better suited for agencies

    The logo for Sendible

    *Pricing correct as of November 2022. Listed in USD and absent discounts.
    See pricing on vendor's website for latest information.

    Sendible primarily markets itself to agencies rather than individual brands or businesses. Sendible's key value proposition is its integration capabilities. It can integrate with 17 different tools including Meta, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn, Google My Business (GMB), YouTube, WordPress, Canva, Google Analytics, and Google Drive. In addition to normal reporting functionality, the Google Analytics integration allows customers to track clickthrough and user behavior for traffic coming from social media channels.

    All plans include the functionality to schedule at least ten posts. Sendible offers excellent collaboration tools, allowing teams to work on assigned tasks and have content approved before they are scheduled to ensure quality control. Sendible offers four plans, with the option to save an additional 15% by signing up for annual payments.

    History

    An image of the timeline for Sendible

    Creator

    • Starts at $29
    • Price per month
    • For freelancers
    • One brand

    Traction

    • Starts at $89
    • Price per month
    • Start-up agencies & brands. 4+ brands

    Scale

    • Starts at $199
    • Price per month
    • For growing agencies & brands

    Custom

    • Opaque pricing
    • Request a quote
    • For large teams & agencies

    The logo for Agorapulse

    Est. 2010 | FRANCE | PRIVATE

    bio

    Agorapulse is an affordable social media dashboard that helps businesses and agencies easily publish content and manage their most important conversations on their social networks.

    An image of SoftwareReviews analysis for Agorapulse

    SoftwareReviews' SMMP Rankings

    Strengths

    • ROI calculation for Facebook
    • Competitor analysis
    • Social inbox functionality

    Areas to improve:

    • Targeted toward agencies
    • Advanced features can't be purchased under lower tier plans

    The logo for Agorapulse

    *Pricing correct as of November 2022. Listed in USD and absent discounts.
    See pricing on vendor's website for latest information.

    Although Agorapulse offers the solution for both agencies and business, they primarily focus on agencies. In addition to the standard social media management functionality, Agorapulse also offers features such as competitor analysis and Facebook contest apps at an affordable price point. They also offer social inbox functionality, allowing the ability to manage the inbox and reply to any message or comment across all social profiles through a single platform.

    The solution is offered in three plans. The pro plan allows ten social profiles and two users. Additional social profiles and users can only be purchased under the premium plan. All plans include ROI calculation for Facebook, but if you want this functionality for other platforms, that's exclusive to the enterprise plan.

    History

    An image of the timeline for Agorapulse

    Pro

    • Starts at $79
    • Price per month
    • 10 social profiles and 2 users

    Premium

    • Starts at $199
    • Price per month
    • 20 social profiles and 2 brands

    Enterprise

    • Opaque pricing
    • 40+ social profiles and 8+ users

    The logo for Buffer

    Est. 2010 | CA, USA | PRIVATE

    bio

    A better way to manage social media for your business. Buffer makes it easy to manage your business' social media accounts. Schedule posts, analyze performance, and collaborate with your team — all in one place.

    An image of SoftwareReviews analysis for Buffer

    SoftwareReviews' SMMP Rankings

    Strengths

    • Competitive pricing
    • Scheduling functionality
    • Mobile app

    Areas to improve:

    • Not suited for medium to large enterprises
    • Limited functionality

    The logo for Buffer

    *Pricing correct as of November 2022. Listed in USD and absent discounts.
    See pricing on vendor's website for latest information.

    Buffer is a social media platform targeted toward small businesses. It is a great cost-effective option for those who want to manage a few social media profiles, with a free plan that lets one user access three social channels. At $5 per month, it's a great entry point for smaller companies to invest in social media management tools, offering functionality like post scheduling and link shortening and optimization tools for hashtags, tags, and mentions across platforms. All plans provide a browser extension, access to a mobile app, two-factor authentication, social media and email support, and access to the Buffer community. Customers can also trial any of the plans for 14 days before purchasing.

    history

    An image of the timeline for Buffer

    Essentials

    • Starts at $5
    • Per month per channel
    • Basic functionality

    Team

    • Starts at $10
    • Per month per channel
    • Adds reporting capabilities

    Agency

    • Starts at $100
    • Per month per channel

    Leverage Info-Tech's research to plan and execute your SMMP implementation

    Use Info-Tech Research Group's three-phase implementation process to guide your own planning.

    • Assess
    • Prepare
    • Govern & Course Correct

    An image of the title page for Info-Tech's governance and management of enterprise software implementation

    Establish and execute an end-to-end, Agile framework to succeed with the implementation of a major enterprise application.

    Visit this link

    Ensure your implementation team has a high degree of trust and communication

    If external partners are needed, dedicate an internal resource to managing vendor and partner relationships.

    Communication

    Teams must have a communication strategy. This can be broken into:

    • Regularity: Having a set time each day to communicate progress and a set day to conduct retrospectives.
    • Ceremonies: Introducing awards and continually emphasizing delivery of value can encourage relationship building and constructive motivation.
    • Escalation: Voicing any concerns and having someone responsible for addressing those concerns.

    Proximity

    Distributed teams create complexity as communication can break down. This can be mitigated by:

    • Location: Placing teams in proximity can close the barrier of geographical distance and time zone differences.
    • Inclusion: Making a deliberate attempt to pull remote team members into discussions and ceremonies.
    • Communication tools: Having the right technology (e.g. video conference) can help bring teams closer together virtually.

    Trust

    Members should trust other members to contribute to the project and complete required tasks on time. Trust can be developed and maintained by:

    • Accountability: Having frequent quality reviews and feedback sessions. As work becomes more transparent, people become more accountable.
    • Role clarity: Having a clear definition of everyone's role.

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Knowledge Gained

    • What a social media management platform (SMMP) is
    • The history of SMMP
    • The future of SMMP
    • Key trends in SMMP

    Processes Optimized

    • Requirements gathering
    • Requests for proposal (RFPs) and contract reviews
    • SMMP vendor selection
    • SMMP implementation

    SMMP Vendors Analyzed

    • Sprout Social
    • HubSpot
    • Zoho Social
    • Khoros
    • Agorapulse
    • Hootsuite
    • Sprinklr
    • MavSocial
    • Sendible
    • Buffer

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Select and Implement a Social Media Management Platform

    • SMMPs reduce complexity and increase the results of enterprise social media initiatives.

    Social Media

    • The Social Media workshop provides clear, measurable improvements to your social media strategy.

    Improve Requirements Gathering

    • An improvement in requirements analysis will strengthen the relationship between business and IT, as more and more applications satisfy stakeholder needs. More importantly, the applications delivered by IT will meet all the must-have and at least some of the nice-to-have requirements, allowing end users to successfully execute their day-to-day responsibilities.

    Bibliography

    "30+ Influencer Marketing Statistics You Should Know (2022)." Shopify, www.shopify.com/blog/influencer-marketing-statistics.
    "A Brief History of Hootsuite." BrainStation®, 2015, https://brainstation.io/magazine/a-brief-history-of-hootsuite#:~:text=In%202008%2C%20Vancouver%2Dbased%20digital,accounts%20from%20a%20single%20interface.&text=In%202009%2C%20BrightKit's%20name%20changed,a%20capital%20%E2%80%9CS%E2%80%9D).
    "About Us." Sprout Social, https://sproutsocial.com/about/#history
    "About Zoho - Our Story, List of Products." Zoho, www.zoho.com/aboutus.html.
    Adam Rowe, et al. "Sprout Social vs Hootsuite - Which Is Best?: Tech.co 2022." Tech.co, 15 Nov. 2022, https://tech.co/digital-marketing/sprout-social-vs-hootsuite
    "Agorapulse Customer Story: Twilio Segment." Segment, https://segment.com/customers/agorapulse/
    "Agorapulse - Funding, Financials, Valuation & Investors." Crunchbase, www.crunchbase.com/organization/agorapulse/company_financials.
    "Agorapulse Release Notes." Agorapulse Release Notes, https://agorapulse.releasenotes.io/
    "Buffer - Funding, Financials, Valuation & Investors." Crunchbase, www.crunchbase.com/organization/buffer/company_financials.
    Burton, Shannon. "5 Genius Social Commerce Examples You Can Learn From." Sprout Social, 28 Oct. 2021, https://sproutsocial.com/insights/social-commerce-examples/ .
    Chris Gillespie. "How Long Should a Video Be." Vidyard, 17 May 2022, www.vidyard.com/blog/video-length/.
    "Consumers Continue to Seek Influencers Who Keep It Real." Matter Communications, 22 Feb 2023. https://www.matternow.com/blog/consumers-seek-influencers-who-keep-it-real/
    "Contact Center, Communities, & Social Media Software." Khoros, https://khoros.com/about.
    Fennell, Kylie, et al. "Blog." MavSocial, https://mavsocial.com/blog/.
    Fuchs, Jay. "24 Stats That Prove Why You Need a Crisis Management Strategy in 2022." HubSpot Blog, HubSpot, 16 Mar. 2022, https://blog.hubspot.com/service/crisis-management-stats
    Geyser, Werner. "Key Social Commerce Statistics You Should Know in 2022." Influencer Marketing Hub, http://influencermarketinghub.com/social-commerce-stats/
    "Global Crisis Survey 2021: Building resilience for the next normal." PwC, 2021. https://www.pwc.com/ia/es/prensa/pdfs/Global-Crisis-Survey-FINAL-March-18.pdf
    "Global Influencer Marketing Value 2016-2022." Statista, 6 Jan 2023, www.statista.com/statistics/1092819/global-influencer-market-size/.
    "Key Social Commerce Statistics You Should Know in 2023." Influencer Marketing Hub, December 29, 2022. https://influencermarketinghub.com/social-commerce-stats/
    "Khoros - Funding, Financials, Valuation & Investors." Crunchbase, www.crunchbase.com/organization/spredfast/company_financials.
    Lin, Ying. "Social Commerce Market Size (2020–2026) ", Oberlo, Oberlo, www.oberlo.com/statistics/social-commerce-market-size#:~:text=Social%20commerce%20statistics%20show%20that,fastest%20and%20slowest%20growth%20rates.
    Mediakix, "5 Influencer Marketing Case Studies." HubSpot, n.d. https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/505330/Influencer-Marketing-5-Case-Studies-Ebook.pdf.
    "Our Story: HubSpot - Internet Marketing Company." HubSpot, www.hubspot.com/our-story .
    PricewaterhouseCoopers. "69% Of Business Leaders Have Experienced a Corporate Crisis in the Last Five Years Yet 29% of Companies Have No Staff Dedicated to Crisis Preparedness." PwC, 2019. www.pwc.com/gx/en/news-room/press-releases/2019/global-crisis-survey.html.
    Ferris, Robert. "Duke Player Zion Williamson Injured When Nike Shoe Blows Apart during Game." CNBC, CNBC, 21 Feb. 2019, www.cnbc.com/2019/02/21/duke-player-zion-williamson-injured-when-nike-shoe-blows-apart-in-game.html.
    "Social Engagement & Sales Platform." Sprinklr, www.sprinklr.com/social-engagement/.
    "Social Media Analytics & Reporting for Growing Brands." Buffer, https://buffer.com/analyze
    "Social Media Management and Advertising Tool." MavSocial, 30 July 2022, https://mavsocial.com/
    "Social Media Management Software." HubSpot, www.hubspot.com/products/marketing/social-inbox.
    "Social Media Management Software - Zoho Social." Zoho, www.zoho.com/social/
    "Social Media Management Tool for Agencies & Brands." Sendible, www.sendible.com/.
    "Social Media Management Tools." Sprout Social, 6 Sept. 2022, https://sproutsocial.com/social-media-management/
    "Social Media Marketing & Management Platform For Enterprises." Khoros, khoros.com/platform/social-media-management.
    "Social Media Monitoring Tool." Agorapulse, www.agorapulse.com/features/social-media-monitoring/.
    "Top 12 Moments in SPRINKLR's History." Sprinklr, www.sprinklr.com/blog/12-moments-sprinklr-history/.
    Twitter, BestBuy, https://twitter.com/BestBuyCanada
    "The Ultimate Guide to Hootsuite." Backlinko, 10 Oct. 2022, https://backlinko.com/hub/content/hootsuite
    Widrich, Leo. "From 0 to 1,000,000 Users: The Journey and Statistics of Buffer." Buffer Resources, Buffer Resources, 8 Dec. 2022, buffer.com/resources/from-0-to-1000000-users-the-journey-and-statistics-of-buffer/.
    Yeung, Carmen. "Social Media Crisis Management 3 Examples Done Right." Synthesio, 19 Nov. 2021, www.synthesio.com/blog/social-media-crisis-management/.

    Vendor Management

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}15|cart{/j2store}
    • Related Products: {j2store}15|crosssells{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.3/10
    • member rating average dollars saved: $9,627
    • member rating average days saved: 10
    • Parent Category Name: Financial Management
    • Parent Category Link: /financial-management
    That does not mean strong-arming. It means maximizing the vendor relationship value.

    Manage an IT Budget

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}70|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 8.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve.
    • member rating average days saved: Read what our members are saying
    • Parent Category Name: Cost & Budget Management
    • Parent Category Link: /cost-and-budget-management
    • IT is viewed as a cost center without a clear understanding of the value it provides.
    • After completing the budget, the CIO is faced with changing expectations, disruptions, new risks, and new threats.
    • IT departments often lack a reliable budget management process to keep itself on track towards its budget goals.
    • Over budgeting risks credibility if projects are not all delivered, while under budgeting risks not being able to execute important projects.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Managing your budget is not just about numbers; it’s also about people and processes. Better relationships and a proper process leads to better management of your budget. Understand how your relationships and current processes might be leveraged to manage your budget.
    • No one likes to be over budget, but being under budget isn’t necessarily good either. Coming in under budget may mean that you are not accomplishing the initiatives that you promised you would, reflecting poor job performance.

    Impact and Result

    • Implement a formal budget management process that documents your planned budget and actual expenditures, tracks variances, and responds to those variances to stay on track towards budget goals.
    • Manage the expectations of business stakeholders by communicating the links between IT spend and business value in a way that is easily understood by the business.
    • Control for under- or overspending by using Info Tech’s budget management tool and tactics.

    Manage an IT Budget Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to understand the increasing expectations for IT departments to better manage their budgets, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Document

    Create a streamlined documentation process that also considers the elements of people and technology.

    • Manage an IT Budget – Phase 1: Document
    • Manage Your IT Budget Tool

    2. Track

    Track your planned budget against actual expenditures to catch areas of over- and underspending in a timely manner.

    • Manage an IT Budget – Phase 2: Track

    3. Control

    Leverage control mechanisms to manage variances in your budget.

    • Manage an IT Budget – Phase 3: Control
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Manage an IT Budget

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Document Budget

    The Purpose

    The first step of managing your IT budget is to make sure there is a properly documented budget that everyone agrees upon.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A properly documented budget facilitates management and communication of the budget.

    Activities

    1.1 Review budget for the year.

    1.2 Document each budget in the tool.

    1.3 Review CAPEX vs. OPEX.

    1.4 Customize accounts to match your organization.

    Outputs

    Budget broken out into monthly increments and by each account.

    Budget documented in tool.

    Tool customized to reflect organization's specific accounts and terminology.

    2 Optimize Documentation Process

    The Purpose

    A proper documentation process forms the backbone for effective budget management.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A streamlined documentation process with accurate inputs that also considers the elements of people and technology.

    Activities

    2.1 Draw out process flow of current documentation.

    2.2 Identify bottlenecks.

    2.3 Discuss and develop roadmap to solving bottlenecks.

    Outputs

    Process flow of current documentation process with identified bottlenecks.

    Plan to mitigate bottlenecks.

    3 Track and Control for Over- and Underspending

    The Purpose

    Track your planned budget against actual expenditures to catch areas of over- and underspending in a timely manner. Then, leverage control mechanisms to manage variances in your budget.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Tracking and controlling for variances will help the IT department stay on track towards its budget goals. It will also help with communicating IT’s value to the business.

    Activities

    3.1 Walk through the “Overview Bar.”

    3.2 Document actual expenses incurred in fiscal to date.

    3.3 Review the risk of over- and underspending.

    3.4 Use the reforecast column to control for over- and underspend.

    Outputs

    Assess the “Overview Bar.”

    Document actual expenditures and committed expenses up to the current date.

    Develop a strategy and roadmap for how you will mitigate any current under- or overspends.

    Reforecast expenditures for each account for each month for the remainder of the fiscal year.

    Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}522|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Requirements & Design
    • Parent Category Link: /requirements-and-design

    The process of navigating from waterfall to Agile can be incredibly challenging. Even more problematic; how do you operate your requirements management practices once there? There traditionally isn’t a role for a business analyst, the traditional keeper of requirements. It isn’t like switching on a light.

    You likely find yourself struggling to deliver high quality solutions and requirements in Agile. This is a challenge for many organizations, regardless of how long they’ve leveraged Agile.

    But you aren’t here for assurances. You’re here for answers and help.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Agile and requirements management are complementary, not competitors.

    Impact and Result

    Info-Tech’s advice? Why choose? Why have to pick between traditional waterfall and Agile delivery? If Agile without analysis is a recipe for disaster, Agile with analysis is the solution. How can you leverage the Info-Tech approach to align your Agile and requirements management efforts into a powerful combination?

    Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment is your guide.

    Use the contents and exercises of this blueprint to gain a shared understanding of the two disciplines, to find your balance in your approach, to define your thresholds, and ultimately, to prepare for new ways of working.

    Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment Blueprint – Agile and Requirements Management are complementary, not competitors

    Provides support and guidance for organizations struggling with their requirements management practices in Agile environments.

    • Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment Storyboard

    2. Agile Requirements Playbook – A practical playbook for aligning your teams, and articulating the guidelines for managing your requirements in Agile.

    The Agile Requirements Playbook becomes THE artifact for your Agile requirements practices. Great for onboarding, reviewing progress, and ensuring a shared understanding of your ways of working.

    • Agile Requirements Playbook

    3. Documentation Calculator – A tool for determining the right level of documentation for your organization, and whether you’re spending too much, or even not enough, on Agile Requirements documentation.

    The Documentation Calculator can inform your documentation decison making, ensuring you're investing just the right amount of time, money, and effort.

    • Documentation Calculator

    4. Agile Requirements Workbook – Supporting tools and templates in advancing your Agile Requirements practice, to be used in conjunction with the Agile Requirements Blueprint, and the Playbook.

    This workbook is designed to capture the results of your exercises in the Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment Storyboard. Each worksheet corresponds to an exercise in the storyboard. This is a tool for you, so customize the content and layout to best suit your product. The workbook is also a living artifact that should be updated periodically as the needs of your team and organization change.

    • Agile Requirements Workbook

    5. Agile Requirements Assessment – Establishes your current Agile requirements maturity, defines your target maturity, and supports planning to get there.

    The Agile Requirements Assessment is a great tool for determining your current capabilities and maturity in Agile and Business Analysis. You can also articulate your target state, which enables the identification of capability gaps, the creation of improvement goals, and a roadmap for maturing your Agile Requirements practice.

    • Agile Requirements Assessment

    Infographic

    Workshop: Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Framing Agile and Business Analysis

    The Purpose

    Sets the context for the organization, to ensure a shared understanding of the benefits of both Agile and business analysis/requirements management.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Have a shared definition of Agile and business analysis / requirements.

    Understand the current state of Agile and business analysis in your organization.

    Activities

    1.1 Define what Agile and business analysis mean in your organization.

    1.2 Agile requirements assessment.

    Outputs

    Alignment on Agile and business analysis / requirements in your organization.

    A current and target state assessment of Agile and business analysis in your organization.

    2 Tailoring Your Approach

    The Purpose

    Confirm you’re going the right way for effective solution delivery.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Confirm the appropriate delivery methodology.

    Activities

    2.1 Confirm your selected methodology.

    Outputs

    Confidence in your selected project delivery methodology.

    3 Defining Your Requirements Thresholds

    The Purpose

    Provides the guardrails for your Agile requirements practice, to define a high-level process, roles and responsibilities, governance and decision-making, and how to deal with change.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Clearly defined interactions between the BA and their partners

    Define a plan for management and governance at the project team level

    Activities

    3.1 Define your agile requirements process.

    3.2 Define your agile requirements RACI.

    3.3 Define your governance.

    3.4 Define your change and backlog refinement plan.

    Outputs

    Agile requirements process.

    Agile requirements RACI.

    A governance and documentation plan.

    A change and backlog refinement approach.

    4 Planning Your Next Steps

    The Purpose

    Provides the action plan to achieve your target state maturity

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Recognize and prepare for the new ways of working for communication, stakeholder engagement, within the team, and across the organization.

    Establish a roadmap for next steps to mature your Agile requirements practice.

    Activities

    4.1 Define your stakeholder communication plan.

    4.2 Identify your capability gaps.

    4.3 Plan your agile requirements roadmap.

    Outputs

    A stakeholder communication plan.

    A list of capability gaps to achieve your desired target state.

    A prioritized roadmap to achieve the target state.

    5 Agile Requirements Techniques (Optional)

    The Purpose

    To provide practical guidance on technique usage, which can enable an improved experience with technical elements of the blueprint.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    An opportunity to learn new tools to support your Agile requirements practice.

    Activities

    5.1 Managing requirements' traceability.

    5.2 Creating and managing user stories.

    5.3 Managing your requirements backlog.

    5.4 Maintaining a requirements library.

    Outputs

    Support and advice for leveraging a given tool or technique.

    Support and advice for leveraging a given tool or technique.

    Support and advice for leveraging a given tool or technique.

    Support and advice for leveraging a given tool or technique.

    Further reading

    Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment

    Agile and requirements management are complementary, not competitors

    Analyst's Perspective

    The temptation when moving to Agile is to deemphasize good requirements practices in favor of perceived speed. If you're not delivering on the needs of the business then you have failed, regardless of how fast you've gone.

    Delivery in Agile doesn't mean you stop needing solid business analysis. In fact, it's even more critical, to ensure your products and projects are adding value. With the rise of Agile, the role of the business analyst has been misunderstood.

    As a result, we often throw out the analysis with the bathwater, thinking we'll be just fine without analysis, documentation, and deliberate action, as the speed and dexterity of Agile is enough.

    Consequently, what we get is wasted time, money, and effort, with solutions that fail to deliver value, or need to be re-worked to get it right.

    The best organizations find balance between these two forces, to align, and gain the benefits of both Agile and business analysis, working in tandem to manage requirements that bring solutions that are "just right".

    This is a picture of Vincent Mirabelli

    Vincent Mirabelli
    Principal Research Director, Applications Delivery and Management
    Info-Tech Research Group

    EXECUTIVE BRIEF

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    The process of navigating from waterfall to Agile can be incredibly challenging. And even more problematic; how do you operate your requirements management practices once there? Since there traditionally isn't a role for a business analyst; the traditional keeper of requirements. it isn't like switching on a light.

    You likely find yourself struggling to deliver high quality solutions and requirements in Agile. This is a challenge for many organizations, regardless of how long they've leveraged Agile.

    But you aren't here for assurances. You're here for answers and help.

    Common Obstacles

    many organizations and teams face is that there are so busy doing Agile that they fail to be Agile.

    Agile was supposed to be the saving grace of project delivery but is misguided in taking the short-term view of "going quickly" at the expense of important elements, such as team formation and interaction, stakeholder engagement and communication, the timing and sequencing of analysis work, decision-making, documentation, and dealing with change.

    The idea that good requirements just happen because you have user stories is wrong. So, requirements remain superficial, as you "can iterate later"…but sometimes later never comes, or doesn't come fast enough.

    Organizations need to be very deliberate when aligning their Agile and requirements management practices. The work is the same. How the work is done is what changes.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    Infotech's advice? Why choose? Why have to pick between traditional waterfall and Agile delivery? If Agile without analysis is a recipe for disaster, Agile with analysis is the solution. And how can you leverage the Info-Tech approach to align your Agile and requirements management efforts into a powerful combination?

    Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment is your guide.

    Use the contents and exercises of this blueprint to gain a shared understanding of the two disciplines, to find your balance in your approach, to define your thresholds, and ultimately, to prepare for new ways of working.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Agile and requirements management are complementary, not competitors.

    The temptation when moving to Agile is to deemphasize good requirements practices in favor of perceived speed. If you're not delivering on the needs of the business, then you have failed, regardless of how fast you've gone.

    Insight summary

    Overarching insight

    Agile and requirements management are complementary, not competitors.

    The temptation when moving to Agile is to deemphasize good requirements practices in favor of perceived speed. If you're not delivering on the needs of the business, then you have failed, regardless of how fast you've gone

    Phase 1 insight

    • The purpose of requirements in waterfall is for approval. The purpose in Agile is for knowledge management, as Agile has no memory.
    • When it comes to the Agile manifesto, "over" does not mean "instead of".
    • In Agile, the what of business analysis does doesn't change. What does change is the how and when that work happens.

    Phase 2 insight

    • Understand your uncertainties; it's a great way to decide what level of Agile (if any) is needed.
    • Finding your "Goldilocks" zone will take time. Be patient.

    Phase 3 insight

    • Right-size your governance, based on team dynamics and project complexity. A good referee knows when to step in, and when to let the game flow.
    • Agile creates a social contract amongst the team, and with their leaders and organization.
    • Documentation needs to be valuable. Do what is acceptable and necessary to move work to future steps. Not documenting also comes with a cost, but one you pay in the future. And that bill will come due, with interest (aka, technical debt, operational inefficiencies, etc.).
    • A lack of acceptable documentation makes it more difficult to have agility. You're constantly revalidating your current state (processes, practices and structure) and re-arguing decisions already made. This slows you down more than maintaining documentation ever would.

    Phase 4 insight

    • Making Agile predictable is hard, because people are not predictable; people are prone to chaos.

    There have been many challenges with waterfall delivery

    It turns out waterfall is not that great at reducing risk and ensuring value delivery after all

    • Lack of flexibility
    • Difficulty in measuring progress
    • Difficulties with scope creep
    • Limited stakeholder involvement
    • Long feedback loops

    48%
    Had project deadlines more than double

    85%
    Exceeded their original budget by at least 20%

    25%
    At least doubled their original budget

    This is an image of the waterfall project results

    Source: PPM Express.

    Agile was meant to address the shortcomings of waterfall

    The wait for solutions was too long for our business partners. The idea of investing significant time, money, and resources upfront, building an exhaustive and complete vision of the desired state, and then waiting months or even years to get that solution, became unpalatable for them. And rightfully so. Once we cast a light on the pains, it became difficult to stay with the status quo. Given that organizations evolve at a rapid pace, what was a pain at the beginning of an initiative may not be so even 6 months later.

    Agile became the answer.

    Since its' first appearance nearly 20 years ago, Agile has become the methodology of choice for a many of organizations. According to the 15th Annual State of Agile report, Agile adoption within software development teams increased from 37% in 2020 to 86% in 2021.

    Adopting Agile led to challenges with requirements

    Requirements analysis, design maturity, and management are critical for a successful Agile transformation.

    "One of the largest sources of failure we have seen on large projects is an immature Agile implementation in the context of poorly defined requirements."
    – "Large Scale IT Projects – From Nightmare to Value Creation"

    "Requirements maturity is more important to project outcomes than methodology."
    – "Business Analysis Benchmark: Full Report"

    "Mature Agile practices spend 28% of their time on analysis and design."
    – "Quantitative Analysis of Agile Methods Study (2017): Twelve Major Findings"

    "There exists a Requirements Premium… organizations using poor practices spent 62% more on similarly sized projects than organizations using the best requirements practices."
    – "The Business Case for Agile Business Analysis" - Requirements Engineering Magazine

    Strong stakeholder satisfaction with requirements results in higher satisfaction in other areas

    This is an image of a bar graph comparing the percentage of respondents with high stakeholder satisfaction, to the percentage of respondents with low stakeholder satisfaction for four different categories.  these include: Availability of IT Capacity to Complete Projects; Overall IT Projects; IT Projects Meet Business Needs; Overall IT Satisfaction

    N= 324 small organizations from Info-Tech Research Group's CIO Business Vision diagnostic.

    Note: High satisfaction was classified as organizations with a score greater or equal to eight and low satisfaction was every organization that scored below eight on the same questions.

    Info-Tech's Agile requirements framework

    This is an image of Info-Tech's Agile requirements framework.  The three main categories are: Sprint N(-1); Sprint N; Sprint N(+1)

    Agile requirements are a balancing act

    Collaboration

    Many subject matter experts are necessary to create accurate requirements, but their time is limited too.

    Communication

    Stakeholders should be kept informed throughout the requirements gathering process, but you need to get the right information to the right people.

    Documentation

    Recording, organizing, and presenting requirements are essential, but excessive documentation will slow time to delivery.

    Control

    Establishing control points in your requirements gathering process can help confirm, verify, and approve requirements accurately, but stage gates limit delivery.

    What changes for the business analyst?

    In Agile, the what of business analysis does not change.

    What does change is the how and when that work happens.

    Business analysts need to focus on six key elements when managing requirements in Agile.

    • Team formation and interaction
    • Stakeholder engagement and communication
    • The timing and sequencing of their work
    • Decision-making
    • Documentation
    • Dealing with change

    Where does the business analysis function fit on an Agile team?

    Team formation is key, as Agile is a team sport

    A business analyst in an Agile team typically interacts with several different roles, including:

    • The product owner,
    • The Sponsor or Executive
    • The development team,
    • Other stakeholders such as customers, end-users, and subject matter experts
    • The Design team,
    • Security,
    • Testing,
    • Deployment.

    This is an image the roles who typically interact with a Business Analyst.

    How we do our requirements work will change

    • Team formation and interaction
    • Stakeholder engagement and communication
    • The timing and sequencing of their work
    • Decision-making
    • Documentation
    • Dealing with change

    As a result, you'll need to focus on;

    • Emphasizing flexibility
    • Enabling continuous delivery
    • Enhancing collaboration and communication
    • Developing a user-centered approach

    Get stakeholders on board with Agile requirements

    1. Stakeholder feedback and management support are key components of a successful Agile Requirements.
    2. Stakeholders can see a project's progression and provide critical feedback about its success at critical milestones.
    3. Management helps teams succeed by trusting them to complete projects with business value at top of mind and by removing impediments that are inhibiting their productivity.
    4. Agile will bring a new mindset and significant numbers of people, process, and technology changes that stakeholders and management may not be accustomed to. Working through these issues in requirements management enables a smoother rollout.
    5. Management will play a key role in ensuring long-term Agile requirements success and ultimately rolling it out to the rest of the organization.
    6. The value of leadership involvement has not changed even though responsibilities will. The day-to-day involvement in projects will change but continual feedback will ultimately dictate the success or failure of a project.

    Measuring your success

    Tracking metrics and measuring your progress

    As you implement the actions from this Blueprint, you should see measurable improvements in;

    • Team and stakeholder satisfaction
    • Requirements quality
    • Documentation cost

    Without sacrificing time to delivery

    Metric Description and motivation
    Team satisfaction (%) Expect team satisfaction to increase as a result of clearer role delineation and value contribution.
    Stakeholder satisfaction (%) Expect Stakeholder satisfaction to similarly increase, as requirements quality increases, bringing increased value
    Requirements rework Measures the quality of requirements from your Agile Projects. Expect that the Requirements Rework will decrease, in terms of volume/frequency.
    Cost of documentation Quantifies the cost of documentation, including Elicitation, Analysis, Validation, Presentation, and Management
    Time to delivery Balancing Metric. We don't want improvements in other at the expense of time to delivery

    Info-Tech's methodology for Agile requirements

    1. Framing Agile and Business Analysis

    2. Tailoring Your Approach

    3. Defining Your Requirements Thresholds

    4. Planning Your Next Steps

    Phase Activities

    1.1 Understand the benefits and limitations of Agile and business analysis

    1.2 Align Agile and business analysis within your organization

    2.1 Decide the best-fit approach for delivery

    2.2 Manage your requirements backlog

    3.1 Define project roles and responsibilities

    3.2 Define your level of acceptable documentation

    3.3 Manage requirements as an asset

    3.4 Define your requirements change management plan

    4.1 Preparing new ways of working

    4.2 Develop a roadmap for next steps

    Phase Outcomes

    Recognize the benefits and detriments of both Agile and BA.

    Understand the current state of Agile and business analysis in your organization.

    Confirm the appropriate delivery methodology.

    Manage your requirements backlog.

    Connect the business need to user story.

    Clearly defined interactions between the BA and their partners.

    Define a plan for management and governance at the project team level.

    Documentation and tactics that are right-sized for the need.

    Recognize and prepare for the new ways of working for communication, stakeholder engagement, within the team, and across the organization.

    Establish a roadmap for next steps to mature your Agile requirements practice.

    Blueprint tools and templates

    Key deliverable:

    This is a screenshot from the Agile Requirements Playbook

    Agile Requirements Playbook

    A practical playbook for aligning your teams and articulating the guidelines for managing your requirements in Agile

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    This is a screenshot from the Documentation Calculator

    Documentation Calculator

    A tool to help you answer the question: What is the right level of Agile requirements documentation for my organization?

    This is a screenshot from the Agile Requirements Assessment

    Agile Requirements Assessment

    Establishes your current maturity level, defines your target state, and supports planning to get there.

    This is a screenshot from the Agile Requirements Workbook

    Agile Requirements Workbook

    Supporting tools and templates in advancing your Agile requirements practice, to be used with the Agile Requirements Blueprint and Playbook.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful."

    Guided Implementation

    "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track."

    Workshop

    "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place."

    Consulting

    "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
    1. Framing Agile and Business Analysis / 2. Tailoring Your Approach 3. Defining Your Requirements
    Thresholds
    3. Defining Your Requirements Thresholds / 4. Planning Your Next Steps (OPTIONAL) Agile Requirements Techniques (a la carte) Next Steps and Wrap-Up (Offsite)

    Activities

    What does Agile mean in your organization? What do requirements mean in your organization?

    Agile Requirements Assessment

    Confirm your selected methodology

    Define your Agile requirements process

    Define your Agile requirements RACI (Optional)

    Define your Agile requirements governance

    Defining your change management plan

    Define your

    communication plan

    Capability gap list

    Planning your Agile requirements roadmap

    Managing requirements traceability

    Creating and managing user stories

    Managing your requirements backlog

    Maintaining a requirements library

    Develop Agile Requirements Playbook

    Complete in-progress deliverables from previous four days.

    Set up review time for workshop deliverables and next steps

    Outcomes

    Shared definition of Agile and business analysis / requirements

    Understand the current state of Agile and business analysis in your organization

    Agile requirements process

    Agile requirements RACI (Optional)

    Defined Agile requirements governance and documentation plan

    Change and backlog refinement plan

    Stakeholder communication plan

    Action plan and roadmap for maturing your Agile requirements practice

    Practical knowledge and practice about various tactics and techniques in support of your Agile requirements efforts

    Completed Agile Requirements Playbook

    Guided Implementation

    Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4

    Call #1: Scope objectives, and your specific challenges.

    Call #4: Define your approach to project delivery.

    Call #6: Define your Agile requirements process.

    Call #9: Identify gaps from current to target state maturity.

    Call #2: Assess current maturity.

    Call #5: Managing your requirements backlog.

    Call #7: Define roles and responsibilities.

    Call #10: Pprioritize next steps to mature your Agile requirements practice.

    Call #3: Identify target-state capabilities.

    Call #8: Define your change and backlog refinement approach.

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is 10 calls over the course of 4 to 6 months.

    Framing Agile and Business Analysis

    Phase 1

    Framing Agile and Business Analysis

    Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4

    1.1 Understand the benefits and limitations of Agile and business analysis

    1.2 Align Agile and business analysis within your organization

    2.1 Confirm the best-fit approach for delivery

    2.2 manage your requirements backlog

    3.1 Define project roles and responsibilities

    3.2 define your level of acceptable documentation

    3.3 Manage requirements as an asset

    3.4 Define your requirements change management plan

    4.1 Preparing new ways of working

    4.2 Develop a roadmap for next steps

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • EXERCISE: What do Agile and requirements mean in your organization?
    • ASSESSMENT: Agile requirements assessment
    • KEY DELIVERABLE: Agile Requirements Playbook

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Business analyst and project team
    • Stakeholders
    • Sponsor/Executive

    Managing Requirements in an Agile Environment

    Step 1.1

    Understand the benefits and limitations of Agile and business analysis

    Activities

    1.1.1 Define what Agile and business analysis mean in your organization

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business analyst and project team
    • Sponsor/Executive

    Outcomes of this step

    • Recognize the benefits and detriments of both Agile and business analysis

    Framing Agile and Business Analysis

    There have been many challenges with waterfall delivery

    It turns out waterfall is not that great at reducing risk and ensuring value delivery after all

    • Lack of flexibility
    • Difficulty in measuring progress
    • Difficulties with scope creep
    • Limited stakeholder involvement
    • Long feedback loops

    48%
    Had project deadlines more than double

    85%
    Exceeded their original budget by at least 20%

    25%
    At least doubled their original budget

    This is an image of the Waterfall Project Results

    Source: PPM Express.

    Business analysis had a clear home in waterfall

    Business analysts had historically been aligned to specific lines of business, in support of their partners in their respective domains. Somewhere along the way, the function was moved to IT. Conceptually this made sense, in that it allowed BAs to provide technical solutions to complex business problems. This had the unintended result of lost domain knowledge, and connection to the business.

    It all starts with the business. IT enables business goals. The closer you can get to the business, the better.

    Business analysts were the main drivers of helping to define the business requirements, or needs, and then decompose those into solution requirements, to develop the best option to solve those problems, or address those needs. And the case for good analysis was clear. The later a poor requirement was caught, the more expensive it was to fix. And if requirements were poor, there was no way to know until much later in the project lifecycle, when the cost to correct them was exponentially higher, to the tune of 10-100x the initial cost.

    This is an image of a graph showing the cost multiplier for Formulating Requirements, Architecture Design, Development, Testing and, Operations

    Adapted from PPM Express. "Why Projects Fail: Business Analysis is the Key".

    Agile was meant to address the shortcomings of waterfall

    The wait for solutions was too long for our business partners. The idea of investing significant time, money, and resources upfront, building an exhaustive and complete vision of the desired state, and then waiting months or even years to get that solution became unpalatable for them. And rightfully so. Once we cast a light on the pains, it became difficult to stand pat in the current state. And besides, organizations evolve at a rapid pace. What was a pain at the beginning of an initiative may not be so even six months later.

    Agile became the answer.

    Since its first appearance nearly 20 years ago, Agile has become the methodology of choice for a huge swathe of organizations. According to the 15th Annual State of Agile report, Agile adoption within software development teams increased from 37% in 2020 to 86% in 2021.

    To say that's significant is an understatement.

    The four core values of Agile helped shift focus

    According to the Agile manifesto, "We value. . ."

    This is an image of what is valued according to the Agile Manifesto.

    "…while there is value in the items on the right, we value the items on the left more."

    Source: Agilemanifesto, 2001

    Agile has made significant inroads in IT and beyond

    94% of respondents report using Agile practices in their organization

    according to Digital.AI's "The 15th State of Agile Report"

    That same report notes a steady expansion of Agile outside of IT, as other areas of the organization seek to benefit from increased agility and responsiveness, including Human Resources, Finance and Marketing.

    While it addressed some problems…

    This is an image of the Waterfall Project Results, compared to Agile Product Results.

    "Agile projects are 37% faster to market than [the] industry average"

    (Requirements Engineering Magazine, 2017)

    • Business requirements documents are massive and unreadable
    • Waterfall erects barriers and bottlenecks between the business and the development team
    • It's hard to define the solution at the outset of a project
    • There's a long turnaround between requirements work and solution delivery
    • Locking in requirements dictates an often-inflexible solution. And the costs to make changes tend to add up.

    …Implementing Agile led to other challenges

    This is an image of a series of thought bubbles, each containing a unique challenge resulting from implementing Agile.

    Adopting Agile led to challenges with requirements

    Requirements analysis, design maturity, and management are critical for a successful Agile transformation.

    "One of the largest sources of failure we have seen on large projects is an immature Agile implementation in the context of poorly defined requirements."
    – BCG, 2015

    "Requirements maturity is more important to project outcomes than methodology."
    – IAG Consulting, 2009.

    "Mature Agile practices spend 28% of their time on analysis and design."
    – InfoQ, 2017."

    "There exists a Requirements Premium… organizations using poor practices spent 62% more on similarly sized projects than organizations using the best requirements practices."
    – Requirements Engineering Magazine, 2017

    Strong stakeholder satisfaction with requirements results in higher satisfaction in other areas

    This is an image of a bar graph comparing the percentage of respondents with high stakeholder satisfaction, to the percentage of respondents with low stakeholder satisfaction for four different categories.  these include: Availability of IT Capacity to Complete Projects; Overall IT Projects; IT Projects Meet Business Needs; Overall IT Satisfaction

    N= 324 small organizations from Info-Tech Research Group's CIO Business Vision diagnostic.

    Note: High satisfaction was classified as organizations with a score greater or equal to eight and low satisfaction was every organization that scored below eight on the same questions.

    Agile is being misinterpreted as an opportunity to bypass planning and analysis activities

    Agile is a highly effective tool.

    This isn't about discarding Agile. It is being used for things completely outside of what was originally intended. When developing products or code, it is in its element. However, outside of that realm, its being used to bypass business analysis activities, which help define the true customer and business need.

    Business analysts were forced to adapt and shift focus. Overnight they morphed into product owners, or no longer had a place on the team. Requirements and analysis took a backseat.

    The result?

    Increased rework, decreased stakeholder satisfaction, and a lot of wasted money and effort.

    "Too often, the process of two-week sprints becomes the thing, and the team never gets the time and space to step back and obsess over what is truly needed to delight customers."
    Harvard Business Review, 9 April 2021.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Requirements in Agile are the same, but the purpose of requirements changes.

    • The purpose of requirements in waterfall is for stakeholder approval.
    • The purpose of requirements in Agile is knowledge management; to maintain a record of the current state.

    Many have misinterpreted the spirit of Agile and waterfall

    The stated principles of waterfall say nothing of how work is to be linear.

    This is an image of a comparison between using Agile and Being Prescriptive.This is an image of Royce's 5 principles for success.

    Source: Royce, Dr. Winston W., 1970.

    For more on Agile methodology, check out Info-Tech's Agile Research Centre

    How did the pendulum swing so far?

    Shorter cycles of work made requirements management more difficult. But the answer isn't to stop doing it.

    Organizations went from engaging business stakeholders up front, and then not until solution delivery, to forcing those partners to give up their resources to the project. From taking years to deliver a massive solution (which may or may not even still fit the need) to delivering in rapid cycles called sprints.

    This tug-of-war is costing organizations significant time, money, and effort.

    Your approach to requirements management needs to be centered. We can start to make that shift by better aligning our Agile and business analysis practices. Outside of the product space, Agile needs to be combined with other disciplines (Harvard Business Review, 2021) to be effective.

    Agility is important. Though it is not a replacement for approach or strategy (RCG Global Services, 2022). In Agile, team constraints are leveraged because of time. There is a failure to develop new capabilities to address the business needs Harvard Business Review, 2021).

    Agility needs analysis.

    Agile requirements are a balancing act

    Collaboration

    Many subject matter experts are necessary to create accurate requirements, but their time is limited too.

    Communication

    Stakeholders should be kept informed throughout the requirements gathering process, but you need to get the right information to the right people.

    Documentation

    Recording, organizing, and presenting requirements are essential, but excessive documentation will slow time to delivery.

    Control

    Establishing control points in your requirements gathering process can help confirm, verify, and approve requirements accurately, but stage gates limit delivery.

    Start by defining what the terms mean in your organization

    We do this because there isn't even agreement by the experts on what the terms "Agile" and "business analysis" mean, so let's establish a definition within the context of your organization.

    1.1.1 What do Agile and business analysis mean in your organization?

    Estimated time: 30 Minutes

    1. Explore the motivations behind the need for aligning Agile with business analysis. Are there any current challenges related to outputs, outcomes, quality? How can the team and organization align the two more effectively for the purposes of requirements management?
    2. Gather the appropriate stakeholders to discuss their definition of the terms "Agile" and "business analysis" It can be related to their experience, practice, or things they've read or heard.
    3. Brainstorm and document all shared thoughts and perspectives.
    4. Synthesize those thoughts and perspectives into a shared definition of each term, of a sentence or two.
    5. Revisit this definition as needed, and as your Agile requirements efforts evolve.

    Input

    • Challenges and experiences/perspectives related to Agile and business requirements

    Output

    • A shared definition of Agile and business analysis, to help guide alignment on Agile requirements management

    Materials

    • Agile Requirements Workbook

    Participants

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Build your Agile Requirements Playbook

    Keep the outcomes of this blueprint in a single document

    Share at the beginning of a new project, as part of team member onboarding, and revisit as your practice matures.

    This is a series of three screenshots from the Agile Requirements Playbook.

    Your Agile Requirements Playbook will include

    • Your shared definition of Agile and business analysis for your organization
    • The Agile Requirements Maturity Assessment
    • A Methodology Selection Matrix
    • Agile requirements RACI
    • A defined Agile requirements process
    • Documentation Calculator
    • Your Requirements Repository Information
    • Capability Gap List (from current to target state)
    • Target State Improvement Roadmap and Action Plan

    Step 1.2

    Align Agile and Business Analysis Within Your Organization

    Activities

    1.2.1 Assess your Agile requirements maturity

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst and Project Team
    • Stakeholders
    • Sponsor/Executive

    Outcomes of this step

    • Complete the Agile Requirements Maturity Assessment to establish your current and target states

    Framing Agile and Business Analysis

    Consider the question: "Why Agile?"

    What is the driving force behind that decision?

    There are many reasons to leverage the power of Agile within your organization, and specifically as part of your requirements management efforts. And it shouldn't just be to improve productivity. That's only one aspect.
    Begin by asking, "Why Agile?" Are you looking to improve:

    • Time to market
    • Team engagement
    • Product quality
    • Customer satisfaction
    • Stakeholder engagement
    • Employee satisfaction
    • Consistency in delivery of value
    • Predictably of your releases

    Or a combination of the above?

    Info-Tech Insight

    Project delivery methodologies aren't either/or. You don't have to be 100% waterfall or 100% Agile. Select the right approach for your project, product, or service.

    In the end, your business partners don't want projects delivered faster, they want value faster!

    For more on understanding Agile, check out the Implement Agile Practices That Work Blueprint

    Responses to a 2019 KPMG survey:

    13% said that their top management fully supports Agile transformation.

    76% of organizations did not agree that their organization supports Agile culture.

    62% of top management believe Agile has no implications for them.

    What changes for the business analyst?

    Business analysts need to focus on six key elements when managing requirements in Agile.

    • Team formation and interaction
    • Stakeholder engagement and communication
    • The timing and sequencing of their work
    • Decision-making
    • Documentation
    • Dealing with change

    In Agile, the what of business analysis does not change.

    What does change is the how and when that work happens.

    1.2.1 Assess your Agile requirements maturity

    This is a series of screenshots from the Agile Requirements Maturity Assessment.

    1.2.1 Assess your Agile requirements maturity

    Estimated time: 30 Minutes

      1. Using the Agile Requirements Maturity Assessment, gather all appropriate stakeholders, and discuss and score the current state of your practice. Scoring can be done by:
        1. Consensus: Generally better with a smaller group, where the group agrees the score and documents the result
        2. Average: Have everyone score individually, and aggregate the results into an average, which is then entered.
        3. Weighted Average: As above, but weight the individual scores by individual or line of business to get a weighted average.
      2. When current state is complete, revisit to establish target state (or hold as a separate session) using the same scoring approach as in current state.
        1. Recognize that there is a cost to maturity, so don't default to the highest score by default.
        2. Resist the urge at this early stage to generate ideas to navigate from current to target state. We will re-visit this exercise in Phase 4, once we've defined other pieces of our process and practice.

    Input

    • Participant knowledge and experience

    Output

    • A current and target state assessment of your Agile requirements practice

    Materials

    • Agile Requirements Maturity Assessment

    Participants

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Tailoring Your Approach

    Phase 2

    Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4

    1.1 Understand the benefits and limitations of Agile and business analysis

    1.2 Align Agile and business analysis within your organization

    2.1 Confirm the best-fit approach for delivery

    2.2 manage your requirements backlog

    3.1 Define project roles and responsibilities

    3.2 define your level of acceptable documentation

    3.3 Manage requirements as an asset

    3.4 Define your requirements change management plan

    4.1 Preparing new ways of working

    4.2 Develop a roadmap for next steps

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Selecting the appropriate delivery methodology
    • Managing your requirements backlog
    • Tracing from business need to user story

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Managing Requirements in an Agile Environment

    Step 2.1

    Confirm the Best-fit Approach for Delivery

    Activities

    2.1.1 Confirm your methodology

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • A review of potential delivery methodologies to select the appropriate, best-fit approach to your projects

    Confirming you're using the best approach doesn't have be tricky

    Selecting the right approach (or confirming you're on the right track) is easier when you assess two key inputs to your project; your level of certainty about the solution, and the level of complexity among the different variables and inputs to your project, such as team experience and training, the number of impacted stakeholders or context. lines of business, and the organizational

    Solution certainty refers to the level of understanding of the problem and the solution at the start of the project. In projects with high solution certainty, the requirements and solutions are well defined, and the project scope is clear. In contrast, projects with low solution certainty have vague or changing requirements, and the solutions are not well understood.

    Project complexity refers to the level of complexity of the project, including the number of stakeholders, the number of deliverables, and the level of technical complexity. In projects with high complexity, there are many stakeholders with different priorities, many deliverables, and high technical complexity. In contrast, projects with low complexity have fewer stakeholders, fewer deliverables, and lower technical complexity.

    "Agile is a fantastic approach when you have no clue how you're going to solve a problem"

    • Ryan Folster, Consulting Services Manager, Business Analysis, Dimension Data

    Use Info-Tech's methodology selection matrix

    Waterfall methodology is best suited for projects with high solution certainty and high complexity. This is because the waterfall model follows a linear and sequential approach, where each phase of the project is completed before moving on to the next. This makes it ideal for projects where the requirements and solutions are well-defined, and the project scope is clear.

    On the other hand, Agile methodology is best suited for projects with low solution certainty. Agile follows an iterative and incremental approach, where the requirements and solutions are detailed and refined throughout the project. This makes it ideal for projects where the requirements and solutions are vague or changing.

    Note that there are other models that exist for determining which path to take, should this approach not fit within your organization.

    Use info-tech's-methodology-selection-matrix

    This is an image of Info-Tech’s methodology selection matrix

    Adapted from The Chaos Report, 2015 (The Standish Group)

    Download the Agile Requirements Workbook

    2.1.1 Confirm your methodology

    Estimated time: 30 Minutes

    1. Using the Agile Requirements Workbook, find the tab labelled "Methodology Assessment" and answer the questions to establish your complexity and certainty scores, where;

    1 = Strongly disagree
    2 = Disagree
    3 = Neutral
    4 = Agree
    5 = Strongly agree.

    1. In the same workbook, plot the results in the grid on the tab labelled "Methodology Matrix".
    2. Projects falling into Green are good fits for Agile. Yellow are viable. And Red may not be a great fit for Agile.
    3. Note: Ultimately, the choice of methodology is yours. Recognize there may be additional challenges when a project is too complex, or uncertainty is high.

    Input

    • Current project complexity and solution certainty

    Output

    • A clear choice of delivery methodology

    Materials

    • Agile Requirements Workbook

    Participants

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Step 2.2

    Manage Your Requirements Backlog

    Activities

    2.2.1 Create your user stories

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • Understand how to convert requirements into user stories, which populate the Requirements Backlog.

    Tailoring Your Approach

    There is a hierarchy to requirements

    This is a pyramid, with the base being: Solution Requirements; The middle being: Stakeholder Requirements; and the Apex being: Business Requirements.
    • Higher-level statements of the goals, objectives, or needs of the enterprise.
    • Business requirements focus on the needs of the organization, and not the stakeholders within it.

    Defines

    Intended benefits and outcomes

    • Statements of the needs of a particular stakeholder or class of stakeholders, and how that stakeholder will interact with a solution.

    Why it is needed, and by who

    • Describes the characteristics of a solution that meets business requirements and stakeholder requirements. Functional describes the behavior and information that the solution will manage. They describe capabilities the system will be able to perform in terms of behaviors or operations. Non-functional represents constraints on the ultimate solution and tends to be less negotiable.

    What is needed, and how its going to be achieved

    Connect the dots with a traceability matrix

    Business requirements describe what a company needs in order to achieve its goals and objectives. Solution requirements describe how those needs will be met. User stories are a way to express the functionality that a solution will provide from the perspective of an end user.

    A traceability matrix helps clearly connect and maintain your requirements.

    To connect business requirements to solution requirements, you can start by identifying the specific needs that the business has and then determining how those needs can be met through technology or other solutions; or what the solution needs to do to meet the business need. So, if the business requirement is to increase online sales, a solution requirement might include implementing a shopping cart feature on your company website.

    Once you have identified the solution requirements, you can then use those to create user stories. A user story describes a specific piece of functionality that the solution will provide from the perspective of a user.

    For example, "As a customer, I want to be able to add items to my shopping cart so that I can purchase them." This user story is directly tied to the solution requirement of implementing a shopping cart feature.

    Tracing from User Story back up to Business Requirement is essential in ensuring your solutions support your organization's strategic vison and objectives.

    This is an image of a traceability matrix for Business Requirements.

    Download the Info-Tech Requirements Traceability Matrix

    Improve the quality of your solution requirements

    A solution requirement is a statement that clearly outlines the functional capability that the business needs from a system or application.

    There are several attributes to look for in requirements:

    Verifiable

    Unambiguous

    Complete

    Consistent

    Achievable

    Traceable

    Unitary

    Agnostic

    Stated in a way that can be easily tested

    Free of subjective terms and can only be interpreted in one way

    Contains all relevant information

    Does not conflict with other requirements

    Possible to accomplish with budgetary and technological constraints

    Trackable from inception through to testing

    Addresses only one thing and cannot be decomposed into multiple requirements

    Doesn't pre-suppose a specific vendor or product

    For more on developing high quality requirements, check out the Improve Requirements Gathering Blueprint

    Prioritize your requirements

    When everything is a priority, nothing is a priority.

    Prioritization is the process of ranking each requirement based on its importance to project success. Each requirement should be assigned a priority level. The delivery team will use these priority levels to ensure efforts are targeted toward the proper requirements as well as to plan features available on each release. Use the MoSCoW Model of Prioritization to effectively order your requirements.

    The MoSCoW Model of Prioritization

    This is an image of The MoSCoW Model of Prioritization

    The MoSCoW model was introduced by Dai Clegg of Oracle UK in 1994

    (Source: ProductPlan).

    Base your prioritization on the right set of criteria

    Criteria Description
    Regulatory and legal compliance These requirements will be considered mandatory.
    Policy compliance Unless an internal policy can be altered or an exception can be made, these requirements will be considered mandatory.
    Business value significance Give a higher priority to high-value requirements.
    Business risk Any requirement with the potential to jeopardize the entire project should be given a high priority and implemented early.
    Likelihood of success Especially in proof-of-concept projects, it is recommended that requirements have good odds.
    Implementation complexity Give a higher priority to low implementation difficulty requirements.
    Alignment with strategy Give a higher priority to requirements that enable the corporate strategy.
    Urgency Prioritize requirements based on time sensitivity.
    Dependencies A requirement on its own may be low priority, but if it supports a high-priority requirement, then its priority must match it.

    Info-Tech Insight

    It is easier to prioritize requirements if they have already been collapsed, resolved, and rewritten. There is no point in prioritizing every requirement that is elicited up front when some of them will eventually be eliminated.

    Manage solution requirements in a Product backlog

    What is a backlog?

    Agile teams are familiar with the use of a Sprint Backlog, but in Requirements Management, a Product Backlog is a more appropriate choice.

    A product backlog and a Sprint backlog are similar in that they are both lists of items that need to be completed in order to deliver a product or project, but there are some key differences between the two.

    A product backlog is a list of all the features, user stories, and requirements that are needed for a product or project. It is typically created and maintained by the business analyst or product owner and is used to prioritize and guide the development of the product.

    A Sprint backlog, on the other hand, is a list of items specifically for an upcoming sprint, which is an iteration of work in Scrum. The Sprint backlog is created by the development team and is used to plan and guide the work that will be done during the sprint. The items in the Sprint backlog are typically taken from the product backlog and are prioritized based on their importance and readiness.

    For more on building effective product backlogs, visit Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision

    A backlog stores and organizes requirements at various stages

    Your backlog must give you a holistic understanding of demand for change in the product.

    A well-formed backlog can be thought of as a DEEP backlog

    Detailed appropriately: Requirements are broken down and refined as necessary

    Emergent: The backlog grows and evolves over time as requirements are added and removed.

    Estimated: The effort to deliver a requirement is estimated at each tier.

    Prioritized: A requirement's value and priority are determined at each tier.

    This is an image of an inverted funnel, with the top being labeled: Ideas; The middle being labeled: Qualified; and the bottom being labeled: Ready.

    Adapted from Essential Scrum

    Ensure requests and requirements are ready for development

    Clearly define what it means for a requirement, change, or maintenance request to be ready for development.

    This will help ensure the value and scope of each functionality and change are clear and well understood by both developers and stakeholders before the start of the sprint. The definition of ready should be two-fold: ready for the backlog, and ready for coding.

    1. Create a checklist that indicates when a requirement or request is ready for the development backlog. Consider the following questions:
      1. Is the requirement or request in the correct format?
      2. Does the desired functionality or change have significant business value?
      3. Can the requirement or request be reasonably completed within defined release timelines under the current context?
      4. Does the development team agree with the budget and points estimates?
      5. Is there an understanding of what the requirement or request means from the stakeholder or user perspective?
    2. Create a checklist that indicates when a requirement or request is ready for development. Consider the following questions:
      1. Have the requirements and requests been prioritized in the backlog?
      2. Has the team sufficiently collaborated on how the desired functionality or change can be completed?
      3. Do the tasks in each requirement or request contain sufficient detail and direction to begin development?
      4. Can the requirement or request be broken down into smaller pieces?

    Converting solution requirements into user stories

    Define the user

    Who will be interacting with the product or feature being developed? This will help to focus the user story on the user's needs and goals.

    Create the story

    Create the user story using the following template: "As a [user], I want [feature] so that [benefit]."
    This helps articulate the user's need and the value that the requirement will provide.

    Decompose

    User stories are typically too large to be implemented in a single sprint, so they should be broken down into smaller, more manageable tasks.

    Prioritize

    User stories are typically too large to be implemented in a single sprint, so they should be broken down into smaller, more manageable tasks.

    2.2.1 Create your user stories

    Estimated time: 60 Minutes

    1. Gather the project team and relevant stakeholders. Have access to your current list of solution requirements.
    2. Leverage the approach on previous slide "Converting Solution Requirements into User Stories" to generate a collection of user stories.

    NOTE: There is not a 1:1 relationship between requirements and user stories.
    It is possible that a single requirement will have multiple user stories, and similarly, that a single user story will apply to multiple solution requirements.

    Input

    • Requirements
    • Use Case Template

    Output

    • A collection of user stories

    Materials

    • Current Requirements

    Participants

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Use the INVEST model to create good user stories

    At this point your requirements should be high-level stories. The goal is to refine your backlog items, so they are . . .

    A vertical image of the Acronym: INVEST, taken from the first letter of each bolded word in the column to the right of the image.

    Independent: Ideally your user stories can be built in any order (i.e. independent from each other). This allows you to prioritize based on value and not get caught up in sequencing and prerequisites.
    Negotiable: As per the Agile principle, collaboration over contracts. Your user stories are meant to facilitate collaboration between the developer and the business. Therefore, they should be built to allow negotiation between all parties.
    Valuable: A user story needs to state the value so it can be effectively prioritized, but also so developers know what they are building.
    Estimable: As opposed to higher-level approximation given to epics, user stories need more accuracy in their estimates in order to, again, be effectively prioritized, but also so teams can know what can fit into a sprint or release plans.
    Small: User stories should be small enough for a number of them to fit into a sprint. However, team size and velocity will impact how many can be completed. A general guideline is that your teams should be able to deliver multiple stories in a sprint.
    Testable: Your stories need to be testable, which means they must have defined acceptance criteria and any related test cases as defined in your product quality standards.
    Source: Agile For All

    Defining Your Requirements Thresholds

    Phase 3

    Defining Your Requirements Thresholds

    Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4

    1.1 Understand the benefits and limitations of Agile and business analysis

    1.2 Align Agile and business analysis within your organization

    2.1 Confirm the best-fit approach for delivery

    2.2 manage your requirements backlog

    3.1 Define project roles and responsibilities

    3.2 define your level of acceptable documentation

    3.3 Manage requirements as an asset

    3.4 Define your requirements change management plan

    4.1 Preparing new ways of working

    4.2 Develop a roadmap for next steps

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Assigning roles and responsibilities optional (Tool: RACI)
    • Define your Agile requirements process
    • Calculate the cost of your documentation (Tool: Documentation Calculator)
    • Define your backlog refinement plan

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Managing Requirements in an Agile Environment

    Step 3.1

    Define Project Roles and Responsibilities

    Activities

    3.1.1 Define your Agile requirements RACI (optional)

    3.1.2 Define your Agile requirements process

    Defining Your Requirements Thresholds

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • A defined register of roles and responsibilities, along with a defined process for how Agile requirements work is to be done.

    Defining Your Requirements Thresholds

    Where does the BA function fit on an Agile team?

    Team formation is key, as Agile is a team sport

    A business analyst in an Agile team typically interacts with several different roles, including the product owner, development team, and many other stakeholders throughout the organization.

    This is an image the roles who typically interact with a Business Analyst.

    • The product owner, to set the priorities and direction of the project, and to gather requirements and ensure they are being met. Often, but not always, the BA and product owner are the same individual.
    • The development team, to provide clear and concise requirements that they can use to build and test the product.
    • Other stakeholders, such as customers, end-users, and subject matter experts to gather their requirements, feedback and validate the solution.
      • Design, to ensure that the product meets user needs. They may provide feedback and ensure that the design is aligned with requirements.
      • Security, to ensure that the solution meets all necessary security requirements and to identify potential risks and appropriate use of controls.
      • Testing, to ensure that the solution is thoroughly tested before it is deployed. They may create test cases or user scenarios that validate that everything is working as intended.
      • Deployment, to ensure that the necessary preparations have been made, including testing, security, and user acceptance.

    Additionally, during the sprint retrospectives, the team will review their performance and find ways to improve for the next sprint. As a team member, the business analyst helps to identify areas where the team could improve how they are working with requirements and understand how the team can improve communication with stakeholders.

    3.1.1 (Optional) Define Your Agile Requirements RACI

    Estimated Time: 60 Minutes

    1. Identify the project deliverables: The first step is to understand the project deliverables and the tasks that are required to complete them. This will help you to identify the different roles and responsibilities that need to be assigned.
    2. Define the roles and responsibilities: Identify the different roles that will be involved in the project and their associated responsibilities. These roles may include project manager, product owner, development team, stakeholders, and any other relevant parties.
    3. Assign RACI roles: Assign a RACI role to each of the identified tasks. The RACI roles are:
      1. Responsible: the person or team who is responsible for completing the task
      2. Accountable: the person who is accountable for the task being completed on time and to the required standard
      3. Consulted: the people or teams who need to be consulted to ensure the task is completed successfully
      4. Informed: the people or teams who need to be informed of the task's progress and outcome
    4. Create the RACI chart: Use the information gathered in the previous steps to create a matrix or chart that shows the tasks, the roles, and the RACI roles assigned to each task.
    5. Review and refine: Review the RACI chart with the project team and stakeholders to ensure that it accurately reflects the roles and responsibilities of everyone involved. Make any necessary revisions and ensure that all parties understand their roles and responsibilities.
    6. Communicate and implement: Communicate the RACI chart to all relevant parties and ensure that it is used as a reference throughout the project. This will help to ensure that everyone understands their role and that tasks are completed on time and to the required standard.

    Input

    • A list of required tasks and activities
    • A list of stakeholders

    Output

    • A list of defined roles and responsibilities for your project

    Materials

    • Agile Requirements Workbook

    Participants

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    A Case Study in Team Formation

    Industry: Anonymous Organization in the Energy sector
    Source: Interview

    Challenge

    Agile teams were struggling to deliver within a defined sprint, as there were consistent delays in requirements meeting the definition of ready for development. As such, sprints were often delayed, or key requirements were descoped and deferred to a future sprint.

    During a given two-week sprint cycle, the business analyst assigned to the team would be working along multiple horizons, completing elicitation, analysis, and validation, while concurrently supporting the sprint and dealing with stakeholder changes.

    Solution

    As a part of addressing this ongoing pain, a pilot program was run to add a second business analyst to the team.

    The intent was, as one is engaged preparing requirements through elicitation, analysis, and validation for a future sprint, the second is supporting the current sprint cycle, and gaining insights from stakeholders to refine the requirements backlog.

    Essentially, these two were leap-frogging each other in time. At all times, one BA was focused on the present, and one on the future.

    Result

    A happier team, more satisfied stakeholders, and consistent delivery of features and functions by the Agile teams. The pilot team outperformed all other Agile teams in the organization, and the "2 BA" approach was made the new standard.

    Understanding the Agile requirements process

    Shorter cycles make effective requirements management more necessary, not less

    Short development cycles can make requirements management more difficult because they often result in a higher rate of change to the requirements. In a shorter timeframe, there is less time to gather and verify requirements, leading to a higher likelihood of poor or incomplete requirements. Additionally, there may be more pressure to make decisions quickly, which can lead to less thorough analysis and validation of requirements. This can make it more challenging to ensure that the final solution meets the needs of the stakeholders.
    When planning your requirements cycles, it's important to consider;

    • Your sprint logistics (how long?)
    • Your release plan (at the end of every sprint, monthly, quarterly?)
    • How the backlog will be managed (as tickets, on a visual medium, such as a Kanban board?)
    • How will you manage communication?
    • How will you monitor progress?
    • How will future sprint planning happen?

    Info-Tech's Agile requirements framework

    Sprint N(-1)

    Sprint N

    Sprint N(+1)

    An image of Sprint N(-1) An image of Sprint N An image of Sprint N(+1)

    Changes from waterfall to Agile

    Gathering and documenting requirements: Requirements are discovered and refined throughout the project, rather than being gathered and documented up front. This can be difficult for business analysts who are used to working in a waterfall environment where all requirements are gathered and documented before development begins.
    Prioritization of requirements: Requirements are prioritized based on their value to the customer and the team's ability to deliver them. This can be difficult for business analysts who are used to prioritizing requirements based on the client's needs or their own understanding of what is important.

    Defining acceptance criteria: Acceptance criteria are defined for each user story to ensure that the team understands what needs to be delivered. Business analysts need to understand how to write effective acceptance criteria and how to use them to ensure that the team delivers what the customer needs.
    Supporting Testing and QA: The business analyst plays a role in ensuring that testing (and test cases) are completed and of proper quality, as defined in the requirements.

    Managing changing requirements: It is expected that requirements will change throughout the project. Business analysts need to be able to adapt quickly to changing requirements and ensure that the team is aware of the changes and how they will impact the project.
    Collaboration with stakeholders: Requirements are gathered from a variety of stakeholders, including customers, users, and team members. Business analysts need to be able to work effectively with all stakeholders to gather and refine requirements and ensure that the team is building the right product.

    3.1.2 Define your Agile requirements process

    Estimated time: 60 Minutes

    1. Gather all relevant stakeholders to discuss and define your process for requirements management.
    2. Have a team member facilitate the session to define the process. The sample in the Agile Requirements Workbook can be used optionally as a starting point. You can also use any existing processes and procedures as a baseline.
    3. Gain agreement on the process from all involved stakeholders.
    4. Revisit the process periodically to review its performance and make adjustments as needed.

    NOTE: The process is intended to be at a high enough level to leave space and flexibility for team members to adapt and adjust, but at a sufficient depth that everyone understands the process and workflows. In other words, the process will be both flexible and rigid, and the two are not mutually exclusive.

    Input

    • Project team and RACI
    • Existing Process (if available)

    Output

    • A process for Agile requirements that is flexible yet rigid

    Materials

    • Agile Requirements Workbook

    Participants

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Establish the right level of governance and decision-making

    Establishing the right level of governance and decision making is important in Agile requirements because there is a cost to decision making, as time plays an important factor. Even the failure to decide can have significant impacts.

    Good governance and decision-making practices can help to minimize risks, ensure that requirements are well understood and managed, and that project progress is tracked and reported effectively.

    In Agile environments, this often involves establishing clear roles and responsibilities, implementing effective communication and collaboration practices, and ensuring that decision-making processes are efficient and effective.

    Good requirements management practices can help to ensure that projects are aligned with organizational goals and strategy, that stakeholders' needs are understood and addressed, and that deliverables are of high quality and meet the needs of the business.

    By ensuring that governance and decision-making is effective, organizations can improve the chances of project success, and deliver value to the business. Risks and costs can be mitigated by staying small and nimble.

    Check out Make Your IT Governance Adaptable

    Develop an adaptive governance process

    A pyramid, with the number 4 at the apex, and the number 1 at the base.  In order from base-apex, the following titles are found to the right of the pyramid: Ad-Hoc governance; Controlled Governance; Agile Governance; Embedded/Automated governance.

    Maturing governance is a journey

    Organizations should look to progress in their governance stages. Ad-hoc and controlled governance tends to be slow, expensive, and a poor fit for modern practices.

    The goal as you progress through your stages is to delegate governance and empower teams to make optimal decisions in real-time, knowing that they are aligned with the understood best interests of the organization.

    Automate governance for optimal velocity, while mitigating risks and driving value.

    This puts your organization in the best position to be adaptive and able to react effectively to volatility and uncertainty.

    A graph charting Trust and empowerment on the x-axis, and Progress Integration on the Y axis.

    Five key principles for building an adaptive governance framework

    Delegate and empower

    Decision making must be delegated down within the organization, and all resources must be empowered and supported to make effective decisions.

    Define outcomes

    Outcomes and goals must be clearly articulated and understood across the organization to ensure decisions are in line and stay within reasonable boundaries.

    Make risk- informed decisions

    Integrated risk information must be available with sufficient data to support decision making and design approaches at all levels of the organization.

    Embed / automate

    Governance standards and activities need to be embedded in processes and practices. Optimal governance reduces its manual footprint while remaining viable. This also allows for more dynamic adaptation.

    Establish standards and behavior

    Standards and policies need to be defined as the foundation for embedding governance practices organizationally. These guardrails will create boundaries to reinforce delegated decision making.

    Sufficient decision-making power should be given to your Agile teams

    Push the decision-making process down to your pilot teams.

    • Bring your business stakeholders and subject matter experts together to identify the potential high-level risks.
    • Bring your business stakeholders and subject matter experts together to identify the potential high-level risks.
    • Discuss with the business the level of risk they are willing to accept.
    • Define the level of authority project teams have in making critical decisions.

    "Push the decision making down as far as possible, down to the point where sprint teams completely coordinate all the integration, development, and design. What I push up the management chain is risk taking. [Management] decides what level of risk they are willing to take and [they] demonstrate that by the amount of decision making you push down."
    – Senior Manager, Canadian P&C Insurance Company, Info-Tech Interview

    Step 3.2

    Define Your Level of Acceptable Documentation

    Activities

    3.2.1 Calculate the cost of documentation

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • Quantified cost of documentation produced for your Agile project.

    Defining Your Requirements Thresholds

    Right-size Your Documentation

    Why do we need it, and what purpose does it serve?

    Before creating any documentation, consider why; why are you creating documentation, and what purpose is it expected to serve?
    Is it:

    • … to gain approval?
    • … to facilitate decision-making?
    • .. to allow the team to think through a challenge or compare solution options?

    Next, consider what level of documentation would be acceptable and 'enough' for your stakeholders. Recognize that 'enough' will depend on your stakeholder's personal definition and perspective.
    There may also be considerations for maintaining documentation for the purposes of compliance, and auditability in some contexts and industries.
    The point is not to eliminate all documentation, but rather, to question why we're producing it, so that we can create just enough to deliver value.

    "What does the next person need to do their work well, to gain or create a shared understanding?"
    - Filip Hendrickx, Innovating BA and Founder, altershape

    Documentation comes at a cost

    We need to quantify the cost of documentation, against the expected benefit

    All things take time, and that would imply that all things have an inherent cost. We often don't think in these terms, as it's just the work we do, and costs are only associated with activities requiring additional capital expenditure. Documentation of requirements can come at a cost in terms of time and resources. Creating and maintaining detailed documentation requires effort from project team members, which could be spent on other aspects of the project such as development or testing. Additionally, there may be costs associated with storing and distributing the documentation.

    When creating documentation, we are making a decision. There is an opportunity cost of investing time to create, and concurrently, not working on other activities. Documentation of requirements can come at a cost in terms of time and resources. Creating and maintaining detailed documentation requires effort from project team members, which could be spent on other aspects of the project such as development or testing. Additionally, there may be costs associated with storing and distributing the documentation.

    In order to make better informed decisions about the types, quantity and even quality of the documentation we are producing, we need to capture that data. To ensure we are receiving good value for our documentation, we should compare the expected costs to the expected benefits of a sprint or project.

    3.2.1 Calculate the cost of documentation

    Estimated time: as needed

    1. Use this tool to quantify the cost of creating and maintaining current state documentation for your Agile requirements team. It provides an indication, via the Documentation Cost Index, of when your project is documenting excessively, relative to the expected benefits of the sprint or project.
    2. In Step 1, enter the hourly rate for the person (or persons) completing the business analysis function for your Agile team. NB: This does not have to be a person with the title of business analyst. If there are multiple people fulfilling this role, enter the average rate (if their rates are same or similar) or a weighted average (if there is a significant range in the hourly rate)
    3. In Step 2, enter the expected benefit (in $) for the sprint or project.
    4. In Step 3, enter the total number of hours spent on each task/activity during the sprint or project. Use blank spaces as needed to add tasks and activities not listed.
    5. In Step 4, you'll find the Documentation Cost Index, which compares your total documentation cost to the expected benefits. The cell will show green when the value is < 0.8, yellow between 0.8 and 1, and red when >1.
    6. Use the information to plan future sprints and documentation needs, identify opportunities for improvement in your requirements practice, and find balance in "just enough" documentation.

    Input

    • Project team and RACI
    • Existing Process (if available)

    Output

    • A process for Agile requirements that is flexible yet rigid

    Materials

    • Agile Requirements Workbook

    Participants

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Lack of documentation also comes at a cost

    Lack of documentation can bring costs to Agile projects in a few different ways.

    • Onboarding new team members
    • Improving efficiency
    • Knowledge management
    • Auditing and compliance
    • Project visibility
    • Maintaining code

    Info-Tech Insight

    Re-using deliverables (documentation, process, product, etc.) is important in maintaining the velocity of work. If you find yourself constantly recreating your current state documentation at the start of a project, it's hard to deliver with agility.

    Step 3.3

    Manage Requirements as an Asset

    Activities

    3.3.1 Discuss your current perspectives on requirements as assets

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • Awareness of the value in, and tactics for enabling effective management of requirements as assets

    Defining Your Requirements Thresholds

    What do we mean by "assets"?

    And when do requirements become assets?

    In order to delivery with agility, you need to maximize the re-usability of artifacts. These artifacts could take the form of current state documentation, user stories, test cases, and yes, even requirements for re-use.
    Think of it like a library for understanding where your organization is today. Understanding the people, processes, and technology, in one convenient location. These artifacts become assets when we choose to retain them, rather than discard them at the end of a project, when we think they'll no longer be needed.
    And just like finding a single book in a vast library, we need to ensure our assets can be found when we need them. And this means making them searchable.
    We can do this by establishing criteria for requirements and artifact reuse;

    • What business need and benefit is it aligned to?
    • What metadata needs to be attached, related to source, status, subject, author, permissions, type, etc.?
    • Where will it be stored for ease of retrieval?

    Info-Tech Insight

    When writing requirements for products or services, write them for the need first, and not simply for what is changing.

    The benefits of managing requirements as assets

    Retention of knowledge in a knowledge base that allows the team to retain current business requirements, process documentation, business rules, and any other relevant information.
    A clearly defined scope to reduce stakeholder, business, and compliance conflicts.
    Impact analysis of changes to the current organizational assets.

    Source: Requirement Engineering Magazine, 2017.

    A case study in creating an asset repository

    Industry: Anonymous Organization in the Government sector
    Source: Interview

    Challenge

    A large government organization faced a challenge with managing requirements, processes, and project artifacts with any consistency.

    Historically, their documentation was lacking, with multiple versions existing in email sent folders and manila folders no one could find. Confirming the current state at any given time meant the heavy lift of re-documenting and validating, so that effort was avoided for an excessive period.

    Then there was a request for audit and compliance, to review their existing documentation practices. With nothing concrete to show, drastic recommendations were made to ensure this practice would end.

    Solution

    A small but effective team was created to compile and (if not available) document all existing project and product documentation, including processes, requirements, artifacts, business cases, etc.

    A single repository was built and demonstrated to key stakeholders to ensure it would satisfy the needs of the audit and compliance group.

    Result

    A single source of truth for the organization, which was;

    • Accessible (view access to the entire organization).
    • Transparent (anyone could see and understand the process and requirements as intended).
    • A baseline for continuous improvement, as it was clear what the one defined "best way" was.
    • Current, where no one retained current documentation outside of this library.

    3.3.1 Discuss your current perspectives on requirements as assets

    Estimated time: 30 Minutes

    1. Gather all relevant stakeholder to share perspectives on the use of requirements as assets, historically in the organization.
    2. Have a team member facilitate the session. It is optional to document the findings.
    3. After looking at the historical use of requirements as assets, discuss the potential uses, benefits, and drawbacks of managing as assets in the target state.

    Input

    • Participant knowledge and experience

    Output

    • A shared perspective and history on requirements as assets

    Materials

    • A method for data capture (optional)

    Participants

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Apply changes to baseline documentation

    Baseline + Release Changes = New Baseline

    • Start from baseline documentation dramatically to reduce cost and risk
    • Treat all scope as changes to baseline requirements
    • Sum of changes in the release scope
    • Sum of changes and original baseline becomes the new baseline
    • May take additional time and effort to maintain accurate baseline

    What is the right tool?

    While an Excel spreadsheet is great to start off, its limitations will become apparent as your product delivery process becomes more complex. Look at these solutions to continue your journey in managing your Agile requirements:

    Step 3.4

    Define Your Requirements Change Management Plan

    Activities

    3.4.1 Triage your requirements

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • An approach for determining the appropriate level of governance over changes to requirements.

    Expect and embrace change

    In Agile development, change is expected and embraced. Instead of trying to rigidly follow a plan that may become outdated, Agile teams focus on regularly reassessing their priorities and adapting their plans accordingly. This means that the requirements can change often, and it's important for the team to have a process in place for managing these changes.

    A common approach to managing change in Agile is to use a technique called "backlog refinement." Where previously we populated our backlog with requirements to get them ready for development and deployment, this involves regularly reviewing and updating the list of work to be done. The team will prioritize the items on the evolving backlog, and the prioritized items will be worked on during the next sprint. This allows the team to quickly respond to changes in requirements and stay focused on the most important work.

    Another key aspect of managing change in Agile is effective communication. The team should have regular meetings, such as daily stand-up meetings or weekly sprint planning meetings, to discuss any changes in requirements and ensure that everyone is on the same page.

    Best practices in change and backlog refinement

    Communicate

    Clearly communicate your change process, criteria, and any techniques, tools, and templates that are part of your approach.

    Understand impacts/risks

    Maintain consistent control and communication and ensure that an impact assessment is completed. This is key to managing risks.

    Leverage tools

    Leverage tools when you have them available. This could be a Requirements Management system, a defect/change log, or even by turning on "track changes" in your documents.

    Cross-reference

    For every change, define the source of the change, the reason for the change, key dates for decisions, and any supporting documentation.

    Communicate the reason, and stay on message throughout the change

    Leaders of successful change spend considerable time developing a powerful change message: a compelling narrative that articulates the desired end state and makes the change concrete and meaningful to staff. They create the change vision with staff to build ownership and commitment.

    • The change message should:
    • Explain why the change is needed.
    • Summarize the things that will stay the same.
    • Highlight the things that will be left behind.
    • Emphasize the things that are being changed.
    • Explain how the change will be implemented.
    • Address how the change will affect the various roles in the organization.
    • Discuss staff's role in making the change successful.

    The five elements of communicating the reason for the change:

    An image of a cycle, including the five elements for communicating the reason for change.  these include: What will the role be for each department and individual?; What is the change?; Why are we doing it?; How are we going to go about it?; How long will it take us?

    How to make the management of changes more effective

    Key decisions and considerations

    How will changes to requirements be codified?
    How will intake happen?

    • What is the submission process?
    • Who has approval to submit?
    • What information is needed to submit a request?

    How will potential changes be triaged and evaluated?

    • What criteria will be used to assess the impact and urgency of the potential change?
    • How will you treat material and non-material changes?

    What is the review and approval process?

    • How will acceptance or rejection status be communicated to the submitter?

    3.4.1 Triage Your requirements

    An image of an inverted triangle, with the top being labeled: No Material Impact, the middle being labeled: Material impact; and the bottom being labeled: Governance Impact.  To the right of the image, are text boxes elaborating on each heading.

    If there's no material impact, update and move on

    An image of an inverted triangle, with the top being labeled: No Material Impact, the middle being labeled: Material impact; and the bottom being labeled: Governance Impact. To the right of the image, is a cycle including the following terms: Validate change; Update requirements; Track change (log); Package and communicate

    Material changes require oversight and approval

    An image of an inverted triangle, with the top being labeled: No Material Impact, the middle being labeled: Material impact; and the bottom being labeled: Governance Impact. To the right of the image, is a cycle including the following terms: Define impact; Revise; Change control needed?; Implement change.

    Planning Your Next Steps

    Phase 4

    Planning Your Next Steps

    Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4

    1.1 Understand the benefits and limitations of Agile and business analysis

    1.2 Align Agile and business analysis within your organization

    2.1 Confirm the best-fit approach for delivery

    2.2 manage your requirements backlog

    3.1 Define project roles and responsibilities

    3.2 define your level of acceptable documentation

    3.3 Manage requirements as an asset

    3.4 Define your requirements change management plan

    4.1 Preparing new ways of working

    4.2 Develop a roadmap for next steps

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Completing Your Agile Requirements Playbook
    • EXERCISE: Capability Gap List

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Managing Requirements in an Agile Environment

    Step 4.1

    Preparing New Ways of Working

    Activities

    4.1.1 Define your communication plan

    Planning Your Next Steps

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • Recognize the changes required on the team and within the broader organization, to bring stakeholders on board.

    How we do requirements work will change

    • Team formation and interaction
    • Stakeholder engagement and communication
    • The timing and sequencing of their work
    • Decision-making
    • Documentation
    • Dealing with change

    As a result, you'll need to focus on;

    Emphasizing flexibility: In Agile organizations, there is a greater emphasis on flexibility and the ability to adapt to change. This means that requirements may evolve over time and may not be fully defined at the beginning of the project.
    Enabling continuous delivery: Agile organizations often use continuous delivery methods, which means that new features and functionality are delivered to users on a regular basis. This requires a more iterative approach to requirements management, as new requirements may be identified and prioritized during the delivery process.
    Enhancing collaboration and communication: Agile organizations place a greater emphasis on collaboration and communication between team members, stakeholders, and customers.
    Developing a user-centered approach: Agile organizations often take a user-centered approach to requirements gathering, which means that the needs and goals of the end-user are prioritized.

    Change within the team, and in the broader organization

    How to build an effective blend Agile and requirements management

    Within the team

    • Meetings should happen as needed
    • Handoffs should be clear and concise
    • Interactions should add value
    • Stand-ups should similarly add value, and shouldn't be for status updates

    Within the organization

    • PMO inclusion, to ensure alignment across the organization
    • Business/Operating areas, to recognize what they are committing to for time, resources, etc.
    • Finance, for how your project or product is funded
    • Governance and oversight, to ensure velocity is maintained

    "Whether in an Agile environment or not, collaboration and relationships are still required and important…how you collaborate, communicate, and how you build relationships are key."
    - Paula Bell, CEO, Paula A. Bell Consulting

    Get stakeholders on board with Agile requirements

    1. Stakeholder feedback and management support are key components of successful Agile requirements.
    2. Stakeholders can see a project's progression and provide critical feedback about its success at critical milestones.
    3. Management helps teams succeed by trusting them to complete projects with business value at top of mind and by removing impediments that are inhibiting their productivity.
    4. Agile will bring a new mindset and significant amounts of people, process, and technology changes that stakeholders and management may not be accustomed to. Working through these issues in requirements management enables a smoother rollout.
    5. Management will play a key role in ensuring long-term Agile requirements success and ultimately rolling it out to the rest of the organization.
    6. The value of leadership involvement has not changed even though responsibilities will. The day-to-day involvement in projects will change but continual feedback will ultimately dictate the success or failure of a project.

    4.1.1 Define your communication plan

    Estimated time: 60 Minutes

      1. Gather all relevant stakeholder to create a communication plan for project or product stakeholders.
      2. Have a team member facilitate the session.
      3. Identify
      4. ;
        1. Each stakeholder
        2. The nature of information they are interested in
        3. The channel or medium best to communicate with them
        4. The frequency of communication
      5. (Optional) Consider validating the results with the stakeholders, if not present.
      6. Document the results in the Agile Requirements Workbook and include in Agile Requirements Playbook.
      7. Revisit as needed, whether at the beginning of a new initiative, or over time, to ensure the content is still valid.

    Input

    • Participant knowledge and experience

    Output

    • A plan for communicating with stakeholders

    Materials

    • Agile Requirements Workbook

    Participants

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team

    Step 4.2

    Develop a Roadmap for Next Steps

    Activities

    4.2.1 Develop your Agile requirements action plan

    4.2.2 Prioritize with now, next, later

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • A comprehensive and prioritized list of opportunities and improvements to be made to mature the Agile requirements practice.

    Planning Your Next Steps

    Identify opportunities to improve and close gaps

    Maturing at multiple levels

    With a mindset of continuous improvement, there is always some way we can get better.

    As you mature your Agile requirements practice, recognize that those gaps for improvement can come from multiple levels, from the organizational down to the individual.

    Each level will bring challenges and opportunities.

    The organization

    • Organizational culture
    • Organizational behavior
    • Political will
    • Unsupportive stakeholders

    The team

    • Current ways of working
    • Team standards, norms and values

    The individual

    • Practitioner skills
    • Practitioner experience
    • Level of training received

    Make sure your organization is ready to transition to Agile requirements management

    A cycle is depicted, with the following Terms: Learning; Automation; Integrated teams; Metrics and governance; Culture.

    Learning:

    Agile is a radical change in how people work
    and think. Structured, facilitated learning is required throughout the transformation to
    help leaders and practitioners go from

    doing Agile to being Agile.

    Automation:

    While Agile is tool-agnostic at its roots, Agile work management tools and DevOps inspired SDLC tools that have become a key part of Agile practices.

    Integrated Teams:


    While temporary project teams can get some benefits from Agile, standing, self-organizing teams that cross business, delivery, and operations are essential to gain the full benefits of Agile.

    Metrics and Governance:

    Successful Agile implementations
    require the disciplined use

    of delivery and operations
    metrics that support governance focused on developing better teams.

    Culture:

    Agile teams believe that value is best created by standing, self-organizing cross-functional teams who deliver sustainably in frequent,
    short increments supported by leaders
    who coach them through challenges.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Agile gaps may only have a short-term, perceived benefit. For example, coding without a team mindset can allow for maximum speed to market for a seasoned developer. Post-deployment maintenance initiatives, however, often lock the single developer as no one else understands the rationale for the decisions that were made.

    4.2.1 Develop your Agile requirements action plan

    Estimated time: 60 Minutes

    1. Gather all relevant stakeholder to create a road map and action plan for requirements management.
    2. Have a team member facilitate the session using the results of the Agile Requirements Maturity Assessment.
    3. Identify gaps from current to future state and brainstorm possible actions that can be taken to address those gaps. Resist the urge to analyze or discuss the feasibility of each idea at this stage. The intent is idea generation.
    4. When the group has exhausted all ideas, the facilitator should group like ideas together, with support from participants. Discuss any ideas that are unclear or ambiguous.
    5. Document the results in the Agile Requirements Workbook.

    Note: the feasibility and timing of the ideas will happen in the following "Now, Next, Later" exercise.

    Prioritize your roadmap

    Taking steps to mature your Agile requirements practice.

    An image of the Now; Next; Later technique.

    The "Now, Next, Later" technique is a method for prioritizing and planning improvements or tasks. This involves breaking down a list of tasks or improvements into three categories:

    • "Now" tasks are those that must be completed immediately. These tasks are usually urgent or critical, and they must be completed to keep the project or organization running smoothly.
    • "Next" tasks are those that should be completed soon. These tasks are not as critical as "now" tasks, but they are still important and should be tackled relatively soon.
    • "Later" tasks are those that can be completed later. These tasks are less critical and can be deferred without causing major problems.

    By using this technique, you can prioritize and plan the most important tasks first, while also allowing for flexibility and the ability to adjust plans as necessary.
    This process also helps you get a clear picture on what needs to be done first and what can be done later. This way you can work on the most important things first, and keep track of what you need to do next, for keeping the development/improvement process smooth and efficient.

    Monitor your progress

    Monitoring progress is important in achieving your target state. Be deliberate with your actions, to continue to mature your Agile requirements practice.

    As you navigate toward your target state, continue to monitor your progress, your successes, and your challenges. As your Agile requirements practice matures, you should see improvements in the stated metrics below.

    Establish a cadence to review these metrics, as well as how you are progressing on your roadmap, against the plan.

    This is not about adding work, but rather, about ensuring you're heading in the right direction; finding the balance in your Agile requirements practice.

    Metric
    Team satisfaction (%) Expect team satisfaction to increase as a result of clearer role delineation and value contribution.
    Stakeholder satisfaction (%) Expect stakeholder satisfaction to similarly increase, as requirements quality increases, bringing increased value.
    Requirements rework Measures the quality of requirements from your Agile projects. Expect that the requirements rework will decrease, in terms of volume/frequency.
    Cost of documentation Quantifies the cost of documentation, including elicitation, analysis, validation, presentation, and management.
    Time to delivery Balancing metric. We don't want improvements in other at the expense of time to delivery.

    Appendix

    Research Contributors and Experts

    This is a picture of Emal Bariali

    Emal Bariali
    Business Architect & Business Analyst
    Bariali Consulting

    Emal Bariali is a Senior Business Analyst and Business Architect with 17 years of experience, executing nearly 20 projects. He has experience in both waterfall and Agile methodologies and has delivered solutions in a variety of forms, including custom builds and turnkey projects. He holds a Master's degree in Information Systems from the University of Toronto, a Bachelor's degree in Information Technology from York University, and a post-diploma in Software & Database Development from Seneca College.

    This is a picture of Paula Bell

    Paula Bell
    Paula A. Bell Consulting, LLC

    Paula Bell is the CEO of Paula A Bell Consulting, LLC. She is a Business Analyst, Leadership and Career Development coach, consultant, speaker, and author with 21+ years of experience in corporate America in project roles including business analyst, requirements manager, business initiatives manager, business process quality manager, technical writer, project manager, developer, test lead, and implementation lead. Paula has experience in a variety of industries including media, courts, manufacturing, and financial. Paula has led multiple highly-visible multi-million-dollar technology and business projects to create solutions to transform businesses as either a consultant, senior business analyst, or manager.

    Currently she is Director of Operations for Bridging the Gap, where she oversees the entire operation and their main flagship certification program.

    This is a picture of Ryan Folster

    Ryan Folster
    Consulting Services Manager, Business Analysis
    Dimension Data

    Ryan Folster is a Business Analyst Lead and Product Professional from Johannesburg, South Africa. His strong focus on innovation and his involvement in the business analysis community have seen Ryan develop professionally from a small company, serving a small number of users, to large multi-national organizations. Having merged into business analysis through the business domain, Ryan has developed a firm grounding and provides context to the methodologies applied to clients and projects he is working on. Ryan has gained exposure to the Human Resources, Asset Management, and Financial Services sectors, working on projects that span from Enterprise Line of Business Software to BI and Compliance.

    Ryan is also heavily involved in the local chapter of IIBA®; having previously served as the chapter president, he currently serves as a non-executive board member. Ryan is passionate about the role a Business Analyst plays within an organization and is a firm believer that the role will develop further in the future and become a crucial aspect of any successful business.

    This is a picture of Filip Hendrickx

    Filip Hendrickx
    Innovating BA, Visiting Professor @ VUB
    altershape

    Filip loves bridging business analysis and innovation and mixes both in his work as speaker, trainer, coach, and consultant.

    As co-founder of the BA & Beyond Conference and IIBA Brussels Chapter president, Filip helps support the BA profession and grow the BA community in and around Belgium. For these activities, Filip received the 2022 IIBA® EMEA Region Volunteer of the Year Award.

    Together with Ian Richards, Filip is the author ofBrainy Glue, a business novel on business analysis, innovation and change. Filip is also co-author of the BCS book Digital Product Management and Cycles, a book, method and toolkit enabling faster innovation.

    This is a picture of Fabricio Laguna

    Fabricio Laguna
    Professional Speaker, Consultant, and Trainer
    TheBrazilianBA.com

    Fabrício Laguna, aka The Brazilian BA, is the main reference on business analysis in Brazil. Author and producer of videos, articles, classes, lectures, and playful content, he can explain complex things in a simple and easy-to-understand way. IIBA Brazil Chapter president between 2012-2022. CBAP, AAC, CPOA, PMP, MBA. Consultant and instructor for more than 25 years working with business analysis, methodology, solution development, systems analysis, project management, business architecture, and systems architecture. His online courses are approved by students from 65 countries.

    This is a picture of Ryland Leyton

    Ryland Leyton
    Business Analyst and Agile Coach
    Independent Consultant

    Ryland Leyton, CBAP, PMP, CSM, is an avid Agile advocate and coach, business analyst, author, speaker, and educator. He has worked in the technology sector since 1998, starting off with database and web programming, gradually moving through project management and finding his passion in the BA and Agile fields. He has been a core team member of the IIBA Extension to the BABOK and the IIBA Agile Analysis Certification. Ryland has written popular books on agility, business analysis, and career. He can be reached at www.RylandLeyton.com.

    This is a picture of Steve Jones

    Steve Jones
    Supervisor, Market Support Business Analysis
    ISO New England

    Steve is a passionate analyst and BA manager with more than 20 years of experience in improving processes, services and software, working across all areas of software development lifecycle, business change and business analysis. He rejoices in solving complex business problems and increasing process reproducibility and compliance through the application of business analysis tools and techniques.

    Steve is currently serving as VP of Education for IIBA Hartford. He is a CBAP, certified SAFe Product Owner/Product Manager, Six Sigma Green Belt, and holds an MS in Information Management and Communications.

    This is a picture of Angela Wick

    Angela Wick
    Founder
    BA-Squared and BA-Cube

    Founder of BA-Squared and BA-Cube.com, Angela is passionate about teaching practical, modern product ownership and BA skills. With over 20 years' experience she takes BA skills to the next level and into the future!
    Angela is also a LinkedIn Learning instructor on Agile product ownership and business analysis, an IC-Agile Authorized Trainer, Product Owner and BA highly-rated trainer, highly-rated speaker, sought-after workshop facilitator, and contributor to many industry publications, including:

    • IIBA BABOK v3 Core Team, leading author on the BABOK v3
    • Expert Reviewer, IIBA Agile Extension to the BABOK
    • PMI BA Practice Guide – Expert Reviewer
    • PMI Requirements Management Practice Guide – Expert Reviewer
    • IIBA Competency Model – Lead Author and Team Lead, V1, V2, and V3.

    This is a picture of Rachael Wilterdink

    Rachael Wilterdink
    Principal Consultant
    Infotech Enterprises

    Rachael Wilterdink is a Principal Consultant with Infotech Enterprises. With over 25 years of IT experience, she holds multiple business analysis and Agile certifications. As a consultant, Rachael has served clients in the financial, retail, manufacturing, healthcare, government, non-profit, and insurance industries. Giving back to the professional community, Ms. Wilterdink served on the boards of her local IIBA® and PMI® chapters. As a passionate public speaker, Rachael presents various topics at conferences and user groups across the country and the world. Rachael is also the author of the popular eBook "40 Agile Transformation Pain Points (and how to avoid or manage them)."

    Bibliography

    "2021 Business Agility Report: Rising to the Challenge." Business Agility, 2021. Accessed 13 June 2022.
    Axure. "The Pitfalls of Agile and How We Got Here". Axure. Accessed 14 November 2022.
    Beck, Kent, et al. "Manifesto for Agile Software Development." Agilemanifesto. 2001.
    Brock, Jon, et al. "Large-Scale IT Projects: From Nightmare to Value Creation." BCG, 25 May 2015.
    Bryar, Colin and Bill Carr. "Have We Taken Agile Too Far?" Harvard Business Review, 9 April 2021. Accessed 11 November, 2022.
    Clarke, Thomas. "When Agile Isn't Responsive to Business Goals" RCG Global Services, Accessed 14 November 2022.
    Digital.ai "The 15th State of Agile Report". Digital.ai. Accessed 21 November 2022.
    Hackshall, Robin. "Product Backlog Refinement." Scrum Alliance. 9 Oct. 2014.
    Hartman, Bob. "New to Agile? INVEST in good user stories." Agile For All.
    IAG Consulting. "Business Analysis Benchmark: Full Report." IAG Consulting, 2009.
    Karlsson, Johan. "Backlog Grooming: Must-Know Tips for High-Value Products." Perforce. 18 May 2018
    KPMG. Agile Transformation (2019 Survey on Agility). KPMG. Accessed November 29.
    Laguna, Fabricio "REQM guidance matrix: A framework to drive requirements management", Requirements Engineering Magazine. 12 September 2017. Accessed 10 November 2022.
    Miller, G. J. (2013). Agile problems, challenges, & failures. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2013—North America, New Orleans, LA. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
    Product Management: MoSCoW Prioritization." ProductPlan, n.d. Web.
    Podeswa, Howard "The Business Case for Agile Business Analysis" Requirements Engineering Magazine. 21 February 2017. Accessed 7 November 2022.
    PPM Express. "Why Projects Fail: Business Analysis is the Key". PPM Express. Accessed 16 November 2022.
    Reifer, Donald J. "Quantitative Analysis of Agile Methods Study: Twelve Major Findings." InfoQ, 6 February, 2017.
    Royce, Dr. Winston W. "Managing the Development of Large Software Systems." Scf.usc.edu. 1970. (royce1970.pdf (usc.edu))
    Rubin, Kenneth S. Essential Scrum: A Practical Guide to the Most Popular Agile Process. Pearson Education. 2012.
    Singer, Michael. "15+ Surprising Agile Statistics: Everything You Need To Know About Agile Management". Enterprise Apps Today. 22 August 2022.
    The Standish Group. The Chaos Report, 2015. The Standish Group.

    Where do I go next?

    Improve Requirements Gathering

    Back to basics: great products are built on great requirements.

    Make the Case for Product Delivery

    Align your organization on the practices to deliver what matters most.

    Requirements for Small and Medium Enterprises

    Right-size the guidelines of your requirements gathering process.

    Implement Agile Practices that Work

    Improve collaboration and transparency with the business to minimize project failure.

    Create an Agile-Friendly Gating and Governance Model

    Use Info-Tech's Agile Gating Framework as a guide to gating your Agile projects following a "trust but verify" approach.

    Make Your IT Governance Adaptable

    Governance isn't optional, so keep it simple and make it flexible.

    Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision

    Build a product vision your organization can take from strategy through execution.

    Secure Your Hybrid Workforce

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}271|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Secure Cloud & Network Architecture
    • Parent Category Link: /secure-cloud-network-architecture
    • Many IT and security leaders struggle to cope with the challenges associated with an hybrid workforce and how best to secure it.
    • Understanding the main principles of zero trust: never trust, always verify, assume breach, and verify explicitly.
    • How to go about achieving a zero trust framework.
    • Understanding the premise of SASE as it pertains to a hybrid workforce.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Securing your hybrid workforce should be an opportunity to get started on the zero trust journey. Realizing the core features needed to achieve this will assist you determine which of the options is a good fit for your organization.

    Impact and Result

    Every organization's strategy to secure their hybrid workforce should include introducing zero trust principles in certain areas. Our unique approach:

    • Assess the suitability of SASE/SSE and zero trust.
    • Present capabilities and feature benefits.
    • Procure SASE product and/or build a zero trust roadmap.

    Secure Your Hybrid Workforce Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Secure Your Hybrid Workforce Deck – The purpose of the storyboard is to provide a detailed description of the steps involved in securing your hybrid workforce with zero trust.

    The storyboard contains two easy-to-follow steps on securing your hybrid workforce with zero trust, from assessing the suitability of SASE/SSE to taking a step in building a zero trust roadmap.

    • Secure Your Hybrid Workforce – Phases 1-2

    2. Suitability Assessment Tool – A tool to identify whether SASE/SSE or a zero trust roadmap is a better fit for your organization.

    Use this tool to identify your next line of action in securing your hybrid workforce by assessing key components that conforms to the ideals and principles of Zero Trust.

    • Zero Trust - SASE Suitability Assessment Tool

    3. RFP Template – A document to guide you through requesting proposals from vendors.

    Use this document to request proposals from select vendors.

    • Request for Proposal (RFP) Template
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Secure Your Hybrid Workforce

    SASE as a driver to zero trust.

    Analyst Perspective

    Consolidate your security and network.

    Remote connections like VPNs were not designed to be security tools or to have the capacity to handle a large hybrid workforce; hence, organizations are burdened with implementing controls that are perceived to be "security solutions." The COVID-19 pandemic forced a wave of remote work for employees that were not taken into consideration for most VPN implementations, and as a result, the understanding of the traditional network perimeter as we always knew it has shifted to include devices, applications, edges, and the internet. Additionally, remote work is here to stay as recruiting talent in the current market means you must make yourself attractive to potential hires.

    The shift in the network perimeter increases the risks associated with traditional VPN solutions as well as exposing the limitations of the solution. This is where zero trust as a principle introduces a more security-focused strategy that not only mitigates most (if not all) of the risks, but also eliminates limitations, which would enhance the business and improve customer/employee experience.

    There are several ways of achieving zero trust maturity, and one of those is SASE, which consolidates security and networking to better secure your hybrid workforce as implied trust is thrown out of the window and verification of everything becomes the new normal to defend the business.

    This is a picture of Victor Okorie

    Victor Okorie
    Senior Research Analyst, Security and Privacy
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    CISOs are looking to zero trust to fill the gaps associated with their traditional remote setup as well as to build an adaptable security strategy. Some challenges faced include:

    • Understanding the main principles of zero trust: never trust, always verify, assume breach, and verify explicitly.
    • Understanding how to achieve a zero trust framework.
    • Understanding the premise of SASE as it pertains to a hybrid workforce.

    Common Obstacles

    The zero trust journey may seem tedious because of a few obstacles like:

    • Knowing what the principle is all about and the components that align with it.
    • Knowing where to start. Due to the lack of a standardized path for the zero trust journey, going about the journey can be confusing.
    • Not having a uniform definition of what makes up a SASE solution as it is heavily dependent on vendors.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    Info-Tech provides a three-service approach to helping organizations better secure their hybrid workforce.

    • Understand your current, existing technological capabilities and challenges with your hybrid infrastructure, and prioritize those challenges.
    • Gain insight into zero trust and SASE as a mitigation/control/tool to those challenges.
    • Identify the SASE features that are relevant to your needs and a source guide for a SASE vendor.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Securing your hybrid workforce should be an opportunity to get started on the zero trust journey. Realizing the core features needed to achieve this will assist you in determining which of the options is a good fit for your organization.

    Turn your challenges into opportunities

    Hybrid workforce is the new normal

    The pandemic has shown there is no going back to full on-prem work, and as such, security should be looked at differently with various considerations in mind.

    Understand that current hybrid solutions are susceptible to various forms of attack as the threat attack surface area has now expanded with users, devices, applications, locations, and data. The traditional perimeter as we know it has expanded beyond just the corporate network, and as such, it needs a more mature security strategy.

    Onboarding and offboarding have been done remotely, and with some growth recorded, the size of companies has also increased, leading to a scaling issue.

    Employees are now demanding remote work capabilities as part of contract negotiation before accepting a job.

    Attacks have increased far more quickly during the pandemic, and all indications point to them increasing even more.

    Scarce available security personnel in the job market for hire.

    Reality Today

    This image is a circle graph and 67% of it is coloured with the number 67% in the middle of the graph

    The number of breach incidents by identity theft.
    Source: Security Magazine, 2022.

    This image is a circle graph and 78% of it is coloured with the number 78% in the middle of the graph

    IT security teams want to adopt zero trust.
    Source: Cybersecurity Insiders, 2019.

    Reduce the risks of remote work by using zero trust

    $1.07m

    $1.76m

    235

    Increase in breaches related to remote work

    Cost difference in a breach where zero trust is deployed

    Days to identify a breach

    The average cost of a data breach where remote work was a factor rose by $1.07 million in 2021. COVID-19 brought about rapid changes in organizations, and digital transformation changes curbed some of its excesses. Organizations that did not make any digital transformation changes reported a $750,000 higher costs compared to global average.

    The average cost of a breach in an organization with no zero trust deployed was $5.04 million in 2021 compared to the average cost of a breach in an organization with zero trust deployed of $3.28 million. With a difference of $1.76 million, zero trust makes a significant difference.

    Organizations with a remote work adoption rate of 50% took 235 days to identify a breach and 81 days to contain that breach – this is in comparison to the average of 212 days to identify a breach and 75 days to contain that breach.

    Source: IBM, 2021.

    Network + Security = SASE

    What exactly is a SASE product?

    The convergence and consolidation of security and network brought about the formation of secure access service edge (SASE – pronounced like "sassy"). Digital transformation, hybrid workforce, high demand of availability, uninterrupted access for employees, and a host of other factors influenced the need for this convergence that is delivered as a cloud service.

    The capabilities of a SASE solution being delivered are based on certain criteria, such as the identity of the entity (users, devices, applications, data, services, location), real-time context, continuous assessment and verification of risk and "trust" throughout the lifetime of a session, and the security and compliance policies of the organization.

    SASE continuously identifies users and devices, applies security based on policy, and provides secure access to the appropriate and requested application or data regardless of location.

    image contains a list of the SASE Network Features and Security Features. the network Features are: WAN optimization; SD WAN; CDN; Network-as-a-service. The Security Features are: CASB; IDPS; ZTNA/VPN; FWaaS; Browser isolation; DLP; UEBA; Secure web gateway; Sandboxing

    Current Approach

    The traditional perimeter security using the castle and moat approach is depicted in the image here. The security shields valuable resources from external attack; however, it isn't foolproof for all kinds of external attacks. Furthermore, it does not protect those valuable resources from insider threat.

    This security perimeter also allows for lateral movement when it has been breached. Access to these resources is now considered "trusted" solely because it is now behind the wall/perimeter.

    This approach is no longer feasible in our world today where both external and internal threats pose continuous risk and need to be contained.

    Determine the suitability of SASE and zero trust

    The Challenge:

    Complications facing traditional infrastructure

    • Increased hybrid workforce
    • Regulatory compliance
    • Limited Infosec personnel
    • Poor threat detection
    • Increased attack surface

    Common vulnerabilities in traditional infrastructure

    • MITM attack
    • XSS attack
    • Session hijacking
    • Trust-based model
    • IP spoofing
    • Brute force attack
    • Distributed denial of service
    • DNS hijacking
    • Latency issues
    • Lateral movement once connection is established

    TRADITIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE

    NETWORK

    SECURITY

    AUTHENTICATION

    IDENTITY

    ACCESS

    • MPLS
    • Corporate Network
    • Antivirus installed
    • Traditional Firewall
    • Intrusion Detection and Prevention System
    • Allow and Deny rules
    • Businesses must respond to consumer requests to:
    • LDAP
    • AAA
    • Immature password complexity
    • Trusted device with improperly managed endpoint protection.
    • Little or no DNS security
    • Web portal (captive)
    • VPN client

    Candidate Solutions

    Proposed benefits of SASE

    • Access is only granted to the requested resource
    • Consolidated network and security as a service
    • Micro-segmentation on application and gateway
    • Adopts a zero trust security posture for all access
    • Managed detection and response
    • Uniform enforcement of policy
    • Distributed denial of service shield

    SASE

    NETWORK

    SECURITY

    AUTHENTICATION

    IDENTITY

    ACCESS

    • Software defined – WAN
    • Content delivery network
    • WAN optimization
    • Network-as-a-service
    • Firewall-as-a-service/NGFW
    • Zero trust network access
    • Endpoint detection & response
    • Secure web gateway
    • Cloud access security broker
    • Data loss prevention
    • Remote browser isolation
    • Multifactor authentication
    • Context-based security policy for authentication
    • Authorization managed with situational awareness and real-time risk analytics
    • Continuous verification throughout an access request lifecycle
    • Zero trust identity on users, devices, applications, and data.
    • Strong password complexity enforced
    • Privilege access management
    • Secure internet access
    • SASE client

    ZERO TRUST

    TENETS OF ZERO TRUST

    ZERO TRUST PILLARS

    • Continuous, dynamic authentication and verification
    • Principle of least privilege
    • Always assume a breach
    • Implement the tenets of zero trust across the following domains of your environment:
      • IDENTITY
      • APPLICATION
      • NETWORK
      • DEVICES
      • DATA

    Proposed benefits of zero trust

    • Identify and protect critical and non-critical resources in accordance with business objectives.
    • Produce initiatives that conform to the ideals of zero trust and are aligned with the corresponding pillars above.
    • Formulate policies to protect resources and aid segmentation.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Securing your hybrid workforce should be an opportunity to get started on the zero trust journey. Realizing the core features needed to achieve this will help you determine which of the options is a good fit for your organization.

    Measure the value of using Info-Tech's approach

    IT and business value

    PHASE 1

    PHASE 2

    Assess the benefits of adopting SASE or zero trust

    Vendors will try to control the narrative in terms of what they can do for you, but it's time for you to control the narrative and identify pain points to IT and the business, and with that, to understand and define what the vendor solution can do for you.

    PHASE 2

    Assess the benefits of adopting SASE or zero trust

    Vendors will try to control the narrative in terms of what they can do for you, but it's time for you to control the narrative and identify pain points to IT and the business, and with that, to understand and define what the vendor solution can do for you.

    Short-term benefits

    • Gain awareness of your zero trust readiness.
    • Embed a zero trust mindset across your architecture.
    • Control the narrative of what SASE brings to your organization.

    Long-term benefits

    • Identified controls to mitigate risks with current architecture while on a zero trust journey.
    • Improved security posture that reduces risk by increasing visibility into threats and user connections.
    • Reduced CapEx and OpEx due to the scalability, low staffing requirements, and improved time to respond to threats using a SASE or SSE solution.

    Determine SASE cost factors

    IT and business value

    Info-Tech Insight

    IT leaders need to examine different areas of their budget and determine how the adoption of a SASE solution could influence several areas of their budget breakdown.

    Determining the SASE cost factors early could accelerate the justification the business needs to move forward in making an informed decision.

    01- Infrastructure

    • Physical security
    • Cabling
    • Power supply and HVAC
    • Hosting

    02- Administration

    • Human hours to analyze logs and threats
    • Human hours to secure infrastructure
    • Fees associated with maintenance

    03- Inbound

    • DPI
    • DDoS
    • Web application firewall
    • VPN concentrators

    04- Outbound

    • IDPS
    • DLP on-prem
    • QoS
    • Sandbox & URL filtering

    04- Data Protection

    • Real-time URL
      insights
    • Threat hunting
    • Data loss prevention

    06- Monitoring

    • Log storage
    • Logging engine
    • Dashboards
    • Managed detection
      and response

    Info-Tech's methodology for securing your hybrid workforce

    1. Current state and future mitigation

    2. Assess the benefits of moving to SASE/zero trust

    Phase Steps

    1.1 Limitations of legacy infrastructure

    1.2 Zero trust principle as a control

    1.3 SASE as a driver of zero trust

    2.1 Sourcing out a SASE/SSE vendor

    2.2 Build a zero trust roadmap

    Phase Outcomes

    Identify and prioritize risks of current infrastructure and several ways to mitigate them.

    RFP template and build a zero trust roadmap.

    Consider several factors needed to protect your growing hybrid workforce and assess your current resource capabilities, solutions, and desire for a more mature security program. The outcome should either address a quick pain point or a long-term roadmap.

    The internet is the new corporate network

    The internet is the new corporate network, which opens the organization up to more risks not protected by the current security stack. Using Info-Tech's methodology of zero trust adoption is a sure way to reduce the attack surface, and SASE is one useful tool to take you on the zero trust journey.

    Current-state risks and future mitigation

    Securing your hybrid workforce via zero trust will inevitably include (but is not limited to) technological products/solutions.

    SASE and SSE features sit as an overlay here as technological solutions that will help on the zero trust journey by aggregating all the disparate solutions required for you to meet zero trust requirements into a single interface. The knowledge and implementation of this helps put things into perspective of where and what our target state is.

    The right solution for the right problem

    It is critical to choose a solution that addresses the security problems you are actually trying to solve.

    Don't allow the solution provider to tell you what you need – rather, start by understanding your capability gaps and then go to market to find the right partner.

    Take advantage of the RFP template to source a SASE or SSE vendor. Additionally, build a zero trust roadmap to develop and strategize initiatives and tasks.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    Zero Trust and SASE Suitability Tool
    Identify critical and vulnerable DAAS elements to protect and align them to business goals.

    Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool
    Perform a gap analysis between current and target states to build a zero trust roadmap.

    Key deliverable:

    Secure Your Hybrid Workforce With Zero Trust Communication deck
    Present your zero trust strategy in a prepopulated document that summarizes the work you have completed as a part of this blueprint.

    Phase 1

    Current state and future mitigation

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    1.1 Limitations of legacy infrastructure

    1.2 Zero trust principle as a control

    1.3 SASE as a driver of zero trust

    2.1 Sourcing out a SASE/SSE vendor

    2.2 Build a zero trust roadmap

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Introduction to the tool, how to use the input tabs to identify current challenges, technologies being used, and to prioritize the challenges. The prioritized list will highlight existing gaps and eventually be mapped to recommended mitigations in the following phase.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • CISO
    • CSO
    • IT security team
    • IT network team

    Secure Your Hybrid Workforce

    1.1 Limitations of legacy infrastructure

    Traditional security & remote access solutions must be modernized

    Info-Tech Insight
    Traditional security is architected with a perimeter in mind and is poorly suited to the threats in hybrid or distributed environments.

    Ensure you minimize or eliminate weak points on all layers.

    • SECURITY
      • DDoS
      • DNS hijacking
      • Weak VPN protocols
    • IDENTITY
      • One-time verification allowing lateral movement
    • NETWORK
      • Risk perimeter stops at corporate network edge
      • Split tunneling
    • AUTHENTICATION
      • Weak authentication
      • Weak passwords
    • ACCESS
      • Man-in-the-middle attack
      • Cross-site scripting
      • Session hijacking

    1.1.1 For example: traditional VPNs are poorly suited to a hybrid workforce

    There are many limitations that make it difficult for traditional VPNs to adapt to an ever-growing hybrid workforce.

    The listed limitations are tied to associated risks of legacy infrastructure as well as security components that are almost non-existent in a VPN implementation today.

    Scaling

    VPNs were designed for small-scale remote access to corporate network. An increase in the remote workforce will require expensive hardware investment.

    Visibility

    Users and attackers are not restricted to specific network resources, and with an absence of activity logs, they can go undetected.

    Managed detection & response

    Due to the reduction in or lack of visibility, threat detections are poorly managed, and responses are already too late.

    Hardware

    Limited number of locations for VPN hardware to be situated as it can be expensive.

    Hybrid workforce

    The increase in the hybrid workforce requires the risk perimeter to be expanded from the corporate network to devices and applications. VPNs are built for privacy, not security.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Hybrid workforces are here to stay, and adopting a strategy that is adaptable, flexible, simple, and cost-effective is a recommended road to take on the journey to bettering your security and network.

    1.1 Identify risk from legacy infrastructure

    Estimated Time: 1-2 hours

    1. Ensure all vulnerabilities described on slide 17 are removed.
    2. Note any forecasted challenge you think you might have down the line with your current hybrid setup.
    3. Identify any trend that may be of interest to you with regards to your hybrid setup.

    This is a screenshot of the organizational profile table found in the Zero Trust - SASE Suitability Assessment Tool

    Download the Zero Trust - SASE Suitability Assessment Tool

    Input

    • List of key pain points and challenges
    • List of forecasted challenges and trends of interest

    Output

    • Prioritized list of pain points and/or challenges

    Materials

    • Excel tool
    • Whiteboard

    Participants

    • CISO
    • InfoSec team
    • IT manager
    • CIO
    • Infrastructure team

    1.2 Zero trust principle as a control

    A zero trust implementation comes with benefits/initiatives that mitigate the challenges identified in earlier activities.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Zero trust/"always verify" is applied to identity, workloads, devices, networks, and data to provide a greater control for risks associated with traditional network architecture.

    Improve IAM maturity

    Zero trust identity and access will lead to a mature IAM process in an organization with the removal of implicit trust.

    Secure your remote access

    With a zero trust network architecture (ZTNA), both the remote and on-prem network access are more secure than the traditional network deployment. The software-defined parameter ensures security on each network access.

    Reduce threat surface area

    With zero trust principle applied on identity, workload, devices, network, and data, the threat surface area which births some of the risks identified earlier will be significantly reduced.

    Improve hybrid workforce

    Scaling, visibility, network throughput, secure connection from anywhere, micro-segmentation, and a host of other benefits to improve your hybrid workforce.

    1.2 SASE as an overlay to zero trust

    Security and network initiatives of a zero trust roadmap converged into a single pane of glass.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Security and network converged into a single pane of glass giving you some of the benefits and initiatives of a zero trust implemented architecture in one package.

    Improve IAM maturity

    The identity-centric nature of SASE solutions helps to improve your IAM maturity as it applies the principle of least privilege. The removal of implicit trust and continuous verification helps foster this more.

    Secure your remote access

    With ZTNA, both the remote and on-prem network access are more secure than the traditional network deployment. The software defined parameter ensures security on each network access.

    Reduce threat surface area

    Secure web gateway, cloud access security broker, domain name system, next-generation firewall, data loss prevention, and ZTNA protect against data leaks, prevent lateral movement, and prevent malicious actors from coming in.

    Improve hybrid workforce

    Reduced costs and complexity of IT, faster user experience, and reduced risk as a result of the scalability, visibility, ease of IT administration, network throughput, secure connection from anywhere, micro-segmentation, and a host of other benefits will surely improve your hybrid workforce.

    Align SASE features to zero trust core capabilities

    Verify Identity

    • Authentication & verification are enforced for each app request or session.
    • Use of multifactor authentication.
    • RBAC/ABAC and principle of least privilege are applied on the identity regardless of user, device, or location.

    Verify Device

    • Device health is checked to ensure device is not compromised or vulnerable.
    • No admin permissions on user devices.
    • Device-based risk assessment is enforced as part of UEBA.

    Verify Access

    • Micro-segmentation built around network, user, device, location and roles.
    • Use of context and content-based policy enforced to the user, application, and device identity.
    • Network access only granted to specified application request and not to the entire network.

    Verify Services

    • Applications and services are checked before access is granted.
    • Connections to the application and services are inspected with the security controls built into the SASE solution.

    Info-Tech Insight

    These features of SASE and zero trust mitigate the risks associated with a traditional VPN and reduce the threat surface area. With security at the core, network optimization is not compromised.

    Security components of SASE

    Otherwise known as security service edge (SSE)

    Security service edge is the convergence of all security services typically found in SASE. At its core, SSE consists of three services which include:

    • Secure web gateway – secure access to the internet and web.
    • Cloud access security broker – secure access to SaaS and cloud applications.
    • Zero trust network access – secure remote access to private applications.

    SSE components are also mitigations or initiatives that make up a zero trust roadmap as they comply with the zero trust principle, and as a result, they sit up there with SASE as an overlay/driver of a zero trust implementation. SSE's benefits are identical to SASE's in that it provides zero trust access, risk reduction, low costs and complexity, and a better user experience. The difference is SSE's sole focus on security services and not the network component.

    SASE

    NETWORK FEATURES

    SECURITY FEATURES

    • WAN optimization
    • SD WAN
    • CDN
    • Network-as-a-service
    • CASB
    • IDPS
    • ZTNA/VPN
    • FWaaS
    • Browser isolation
    • DLP
    • UEBA
    • Secure web gateway
    • Sandboxing

    1.3 Pros & cons of zero trust and SASE

    Zero Trust

    SASE

    Pros

    Cons

    Pros

    Cons

    • Robust IAM process and technologies with role-based access control.
    • Strong and continuous verification of identity of user accounts, devices, data, location, and principle of least privilege applied.
    • Micro-segmentation applied around users, network, devices, roles, and applications to prevent lateral movement.
    • Threat attack surface eliminated, which reduces organizational risks.
    • Protection of data strengthened based on sensitivity and micro-segmentation.
    • Difficult to identify the scope of the zero trust initiative.
    • Requires continuous and ongoing update of access controls.
    • Zero trust journey/process could take years and is prone to being abandoned without commitment from executives.
    • Legacy systems can be hard to replace, which would require all stakeholders to prioritize resource allocation.
    • Can be expensive to implement.
    • Adopts a zero trust security posture for all access requests.
    • Converged and consolidated network and security delivered as a cloud service to the user rather than a single point of enforcement.
    • Centralized visibility of devices, data in transit and at rest, user activities, and threats.
    • Cheaper than a zero trust roadmap implementation.
    • Managed detection and response.
    • The limited knowledge of SASE.
    • No universally agreed upon SASE definition.
    • SASE products are still being developed and are open to vendors' interpretation.
    • Existing vendor relationships could be a hinderance to deployment.
    • Hard to manage MSSPs.

    Understand SASE and zero trust suitability for your needs

    Estimated Time: 1 hour

    Use the dashboard to understand the value assessment of adopting a SASE product or building a zero trust roadmap.

    This is an image of the SASE Suitability Assessment

    This is the image of the Zero Trust Suitability Assessment

    Info-Tech Insight

    This tool will help steer you on a path to take as a form of mitigation/control to some or all the identified challenges.

    Phase 2

    Make a decision and next steps

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    1.1 Limitations of legacy infrastructure

    1.2 Zero trust principle as a control

    1.3 SASE as a driver of zero trust

    2.1 Sourcing out a SASE/SSE vendor

    2.2 Build a zero trust roadmap

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Introduction to the tool activity, how to use the input tabs and considerations to generate an output that could help understand the current state of your hybrid infrastructure and what direction is to be followed next to improve.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • CISO
    • CSO
    • IT security
    • IT network team

    Secure Your Hybrid Workforce

    Step 2.1

    Sourcing out a SASE/SSE vendor

    Activities

    2.1.1 Use the RFP template to request proposal from vendors

    2.1.2 Use SoftwareReviews to compare vendors

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO, CISO, IT manager, Infosec team, executives.

    Outcomes of this step

    • Zero Trust Roadmap

    2.1.1 Use the RFP template to request proposal from vendors

    Estimated Time: 1-3 hours

    1. As a group, use the RFP Template to include technical capabilities of your desired SASE product and to request proposals from vendors.
    2. The features that are most important to your organization generated from phase one should be highlighted in the RFP.

    Input

    • List of SASE features
    • Technical capabilities

    Output

    • RFP

    Materials

    • RFP Template

    Participants

    • Security team
    • IT leadership

    Download the RFP Template

    2.1.2 Use SoftwareReviews to compare vendors

    SoftwareReviews

    • The Data Quadrant is a thorough evaluation and ranking of all software in an individual category to compare platforms across multiple dimensions.
    • Vendors are ranked by their Composite Score, based on individual feature evaluations, user satisfaction rankings, vendor capability comparisons, and likeliness to recommend the platform.
    • The Emotional Footprint is a powerful indicator of overall user sentiment toward the relationship with the vendor, capturing data across five dimensions.
    • Vendors are ranked by their Customer Experience (CX) Score, which combines the overall Emotional Footprint rating with a measure of the value delivered by the solution.

    Step 2.2

    Zero trust readiness and roadmap

    Activities

    2.2.1 Assess the maturity of your current zero trust implementation

    2.2.2 Understand business needs and current security projects

    2.2.3 Set target maturity state with timeframe

    This step involves the following participants:

    CIO, CISO, IT manager, Infosec team, executives.

    Outcomes of this step

    Zero Trust Roadmap

    2.2.1 Assess the maturity of your current zero trust implementation

    Estimated Time: 1-3 hours

    • Realizing that zero trust is a journey helps create a better roadmap and implementation. Identify the current controls or solutions in your organization that align with the principle of zero trust.
    • Break down these controls or solutions into different silos (e.g. identity, security, network, data, device, applications, etc.).
    • Determine your zero trust readiness.

    Input

    • List of zero trust controls/solutions
    • Siloed list of zero trust controls/solutions
    • Current state of zero trust maturity

    Output

    • Zero trust readiness and current maturity state

    Materials

    • Zero Trust Security Benefit Assessment tool

    Participants

    • Security team
    • IT leadership

    Download the Zero Trust Security Benefit Assessment tool

    2.2.2 Understand business needs and current security projects

    Estimated Time: 1-3 hours

    1. Identify the business and IT executives, application owners, and board members whose vision aligns with the zero trust journey.
    2. Identify existing projects within security, IT, and the business and highlight interdependencies or how they fit with the zero trust journey.
    3. Build a rough sketch of the roadmap that fits the business needs, current projects and the zero trust journey.

    Input

    • Meetings with stakeholders
    • List of current and future projects

    Output

    • Sketch of zero trust roadmap

    Materials

    • Whiteboard activity

    Participants

    • Security team
    • IT leadership
    • IT ops team
    • Business executives
    • Board members

    Download Zero Trust Protect Surface Mapping Tool

    2.2.3 Set target maturity state with a given timeframe

    Estimated Time: 1-3 hours

    1. With the zero trust readiness, current business, IT and security projects, current maturity state, and sketch of the roadmap, setting a target maturity state within some timeframe is at the top of the list. The target maturity state will include a list of initiatives that could be siloed and confined to a timeframe.
    2. A Gantt chart or graph could be used to complete this task.

    Input

    • Results from previous activity slides

    Output

    • Current state and target state assessment for gap analysis
    • List of initiatives and timeframe

    Materials

    • Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • Security team
    • IT leadership
    • IT ops team
    • Business executives
    • Board members

    Download the Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Insights Gained

    • Difference between zero trust as a principle and SASE as a framework
    • Difference between SASE and SSE platforms.
    • Assessment of which path to take in securing your hybrid workforce

    Deliverables Completed

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Contact your account representative for more information

    workshops@infotech.com

    1-888-670-8889

    Additional Support

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.

    Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech's historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    This is a screenshot from the Zero Trust - SASE Suitability Assessment Tool

    Zero Trust - SASE Suitability Assessment Tool

    Assess current security capabilities and build a roadmap of tasks and initiatives that close maturity gaps.

    Research Contributors

    • Aaron Shum, Vice President, Security & Privacy
    • Cameron Smith, Research Lead, Security & Privacy
    • Brad Mateski, Zones, Solutions Architect for CyberSecurity
    • Bob Smock, Info-Tech Research Group, Vice President of Consulting
    • Dr. Chase Cunningham, Ericom Software, Chief Strategy Officer
    • John Kindervag, ON2IT Cybersecurity, Senior Vice President, Cybersecurity Strategy and ON2IT Group Fellow
    • John Zhao, Fonterra, Enterprise Security Architect
    • Rongxing Lu, University of New Brunswick, Associate Professor
    • Sumanta Sarkar, University of Warwick, Assistant Professor
    • Tim Malone, J.B. Hunt Transport, Senior Director Information Security
    • Vana Matte, J.B. Hunt Transport, Senior Vice President of Technology Services

    Related Info-Tech Research

    This is a screenshot from Info-Tech's Security Strategy Model

    Build an Information Security Strategy

    Info-Tech has developed a highly effective approach to building an information security strategy – an approach that has been successfully tested and refined for over seven years with hundreds of organizations. This unique approach includes tools for ensuring alignment with business objectives, assessing organizational risk and stakeholder expectations, enabling a comprehensive current state assessment, prioritizing initiatives, and building out a security roadmap.

    This is a screenshot from Info-Tech's research: Determine Your Zero Trust Readiness

    Determine Your Zero Trust Readiness

    IT security was typified by perimeter security. However, the way the world does business has mandated a change to IT security. In response, zero trust is a set of principles that can add flexibility to planning your IT security strategy.

    Use this blueprint to determine your zero trust readiness and understand how zero trust can benefit both security and the business.

    This is a screenshot from Info-Tech's research: Mature Your Identity and Access Management Program

    Mature Your Identity and Access Management Program

    Many organizations are looking to improve their identity and access management (IAM) practices but struggle with where to start and whether all areas of IAM have been considered. This blueprint will help you improve the organization's IAM practices by following our three-phase methodology:

    • Assess identity and access requirements.
    • Identify initiatives using the identity lifecycle.
    • Prioritize initiatives and build a roadmap.

    Bibliography

    "2021 Data Breach Investigations Report." Verizon, 2021. Web.
    "Fortinet Brings Networking and Security to the Cloud" Fortinet, 2 Mar. 2021. Web.
    "A Zero Trust Strategy Has 3 Needs – Identify, Authenticate, and Monitor Users and Devices on and off the Network." Fortinet, 15 July 2021. Web.
    "Applying Zero Trust Principles to Enterprise Mobility." CISA, Mar. 2022. Web.
    "CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model." CISA, Cybersecurity Division, June 2021. Web.
    "Continuous Diagnostics and Mitigation Program Overview." CISA, Jan. 2022. Web.
    "Cost of a Data Breach Report 2021 | IBM." IBM, July 2021. Web.
    English, Melanie. "5 Stats That Show The Cost Saving Effect of Zero Trust." Teramind, 29 Sept. 2021. Web.
    Hunter, Steve. "The Five Business Benefits of a Zero Trust Approach to Security." Security Brief - Australia, 19 Aug. 2020. Web.
    "Improve Application Access and Security With Fortinet Zero Trust Network Access." Fortinet, 2 Mar. 2021. Web.
    "Incorporating zero trust Strategies for Secure Network and Application Access." Fortinet, 21 Jul. 2021. Web.
    Jakkal, Vasu. "Zero Trust Adoption Report: How Does Your Organization Compare?" Microsoft, 28 July 2021. Web.
    "Jericho Forum™ Commandments." The Open Group, Jericho Forum, May 2007. Web.
    Schulze, Holger. "2019 Zero Trust Adoption Report." Cybersecurity Insiders, 2019. Web.
    "67% of Organizations Had Identity-Related Data Breaches Last Year." Security Magazine, 22 Aug. 2022. Web.
    United States, Executive Office of the President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. "Executive Order on Improving the Nation's Cybersecurity." The White House, 12 May 2021. Web.

    Take Control of Infrastructure and Operations Metrics

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}460|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 8.5/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $7,199 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 11 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Operations Management
    • Parent Category Link: /i-and-o-process-management
    • Measuring the business value provided by IT is very challenging.
    • You have a number of metrics, but they may not be truly meaningful, contextual, or actionable.
    • You know you need more than a single metric to tell the whole story. You also suspect that metrics from different systems combined will tell an even fuller story.
    • You are being asked to provide information from different levels of management, for different audiences, conveying different information.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Many organizations collect metrics to validate they are keeping the lights on. But the Infrastructure and Operations managers who are benefitting the most are taking steps to ensure they are getting the right metrics to help them make decisions, manage costs, and plan for change.
    • Complaints about metrics are often rooted in managers wading through too many individual metrics, wrong metrics, or data that they simply can’t trust.
    • Info-Tech surveyed and interviewed a number of Infrastructure managers, CIOs, and IT leaders to understand how they are leveraging metrics. Successful organizations are using metrics for everything from capacity planning to solving customer service issues to troubleshooting system failures.

    Impact and Result

    • Manage metrics so they don’t become time wasters and instead provide real value.
    • Identify the types of metrics you need to focus on.
    • Build a metrics process to ensure you are collecting the right metrics and getting data you can use to save time and make better decisions.

    Take Control of Infrastructure and Operations Metrics Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should implement a metrics program in your Infrastructure and Operations practice, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Gap analysis

    This phase will help you identify challenges that you want to avoid by implementing a metrics program, discover the main IT goals, and determine your core metrics.

    • Take Control of Infrastructure and Operations Metrics – Phase 1: Gap Analysis
    • Infra & Ops Metrics Executive Presentation

    2. Build strategy

    This phase will help you make an actionable plan to implement your metrics program, define roles and responsibilities, and communicate your metrics project across your organization and with the business division.

    • Take Control of Infrastructure and Operations Metrics – Phase 2: Build Strategy
    • Infra & Ops Metrics Definition Template
    • Infra & Ops Metrics Tracking and Reporting Tool
    • Infra & Ops Metrics Program Roles & Responsibilities Guide
    • Weekly Metrics Review With Your Staff
    • Quarterly Metrics Review With the CIO
    [infographic]

    Take Control of Cloud Costs on Microsoft Azure

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}426|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $125,999 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 50 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Cloud Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /cloud-strategy
    • Traditional IT budgeting and procurement processes don't work for public cloud services.
    • The self-service nature of the cloud means that often the people provisioning cloud resources aren't accountable for the cost of those resources.
    • Without centralized control or oversight, organizations can quickly end up with massive Azure bills that exceed their IT salary cost.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Most engineers care more about speed of feature delivery and reliability of the system than they do about cost.
    • Often there are no consequences for overarchitecting or overspending on Azure.
    • Many organizations lack sufficient visibility into their Azure spend, making it impossible to establish accountability and controls.

    Impact and Result

    • Define roles and responsibilities.
    • Establish visibility.
    • Develop processes, procedures, and policies.

    Take Control of Cloud Costs on Microsoft Azure Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should take control of cloud costs, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Build a cost accountability framework

    Assess your current state, define your cost allocation model, and define roles and responsibilities.

    • Cloud Cost Management Worksheet
    • Cloud Cost Management Capability Assessment
    • Cloud Cost Management Policy
    • Cloud Cost Glossary of Terms

    2. Establish visibility

    Define dashboards and reports, and document account structure and tagging requirements.

    • Service Cost Cheat Sheet for Azure

    3. Define processes and procedures

    Establish governance for tagging and cost control, define process for right-sizing, and define process for purchasing commitment discounts.

    • Right-Sizing Workflow (Visio)
    • Right-Sizing Workflow (PDF)
    • Commitment Purchasing Workflow (Visio)
    • Commitment Purchasing Workflow (PDF)

    4. Build an implementation plan

    Document process interactions, establish program KPIs, and build implementation roadmap and communication plan.

    • Cloud Cost Management Task List
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Take Control of Cloud Costs on Microsoft Azure

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Build a Cost Accountability Framework

    The Purpose

    Establish clear lines of accountability and document roles & responsibilities to effectively manage cloud costs.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understanding of key areas to focus on to improve cloud cost management capabilities.

    Activities

    1.1 Assess current state

    1.2 Determine cloud cost model

    1.3 Define roles & responsibilities

    Outputs

    Cloud cost management capability assessment

    Cloud cost model

    Roles & responsibilities

    2 Establish Visibility

    The Purpose

    Establish visibility into cloud costs and drivers of those costs.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Better understanding of what is driving costs and how to keep them in check.

    Activities

    2.1 Develop architectural patterns

    2.2 Define dashboards and reports

    2.3 Define account structure

    2.4 Document tagging requirements

    Outputs

    Architectural patterns; service cost cheat sheet

    Dashboards and reports

    Account structure

    Tagging scheme

    3 Define Processes & Procedures

    The Purpose

    Develop processes, procedures, and policies to control cloud costs.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Improved capability of reducing costs.

    Documented processes & procedures for continuous improvement.

    Activities

    3.1 Establish governance for tagging

    3.2 Establish governance for costs

    3.3 Define right-sizing process

    3.4 Define purchasing process

    3.5 Define notification and alerts

    Outputs

    Tagging policy

    Cost control policy

    Right-sizing process

    Commitment purchasing process

    Notifications and alerts

    4 Build an Implementation Plan

    The Purpose

    Document next steps to implement & improve cloud cost management program.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Concrete roadmap to stand up and/or improve the cloud cost management program.

    Activities

    4.1 Document process interaction changes

    4.2 Define cloud cost program KPIs

    4.3 Build implementation roadmap

    4.4 Build communication plan

    Outputs

    Changes to process interactions

    Cloud cost program KPIs

    Implementation roadmap

    Communication plan

    Mergers & Acquisitions: The Sell Blueprint

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}324|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: IT Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /it-strategy

    There are four key scenarios or entry points for IT as the selling/divesting organization in M&As:

    • IT can suggest a divestiture to meet the business objectives of the organization.
    • IT is brought in to strategy plan the sale/divestiture from both the business’ and IT’s perspectives.
    • IT participates in due diligence activities and complies with the purchasing organization’s asks.
    • IT needs to reactively prepare its environment to enable the separation.

    Consider the ideal scenario for your IT organization.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Divestitures are inevitable in modern business, and IT’s involvement in the process should be too. This progression is inspired by:

    • The growing trend for organizations to increase, decrease, or evolve through these types of transactions.
    • A maturing business perspective of IT, preventing the difficulty that IT is faced with when invited into the transaction process late.
    • Transactions that are driven by digital motivations, requiring IT’s expertise.
    • There never being such a thing as a true merger, making the majority of M&A activity either acquisitions or divestitures.

    Impact and Result

    Prepare for a sale/divestiture transaction by:

    • Recognizing the trend for organizations to engage in M&A activity and the increased likelihood that, as an IT leader, you will be involved in a transaction in your career.
    • Creating a standard strategy that will enable strong program management.
    • Properly considering all the critical components of the transaction and integration by prioritizing tasks that will reduce risk, deliver value, and meet stakeholder expectations.

    Mergers & Acquisitions: The Sell Blueprint Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out how your organization can excel its reduction strategy by engaging in M&A transactions. Review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Proactive Phase

    Be an innovative IT leader by suggesting how and why the business should engage in an acquisition or divestiture.

    • One-Pager: M&A Proactive
    • Case Study: M&A Proactive
    • Information Asset Audit Tool
    • Data Valuation Tool
    • Enterprise Integration Process Mapping Tool
    • Risk Register Tool
    • Security M&A Due Diligence Tool
    • Service Catalog Internal Service Level Agreement Template

    2. Discovery & Strategy

    Create a standardized approach for how your IT organization should address divestitures or sales.

    • One-Pager: M&A Discovery & Strategy – Sell
    • Case Study: M&A Discovery & Strategy – Sell

    3. Due Diligence & Preparation

    Comply with due diligence, prepare the IT environment for carve-out possibilities, and establish the separation project plan.

    • One-Pager: M&A Due Diligence & Preparation – Sell
    • Case Study: M&A Due Diligence & Preparation – Sell
    • IT Due Diligence Charter
    • IT Culture Diagnostic
    • M&A Separation Project Management Tool (SharePoint)
    • SharePoint Template: Step-by-Step Deployment Guide
    • M&A Separation Project Management Tool (Excel)

    4. Execution & Value Realization

    Deliver on the separation project plan successfully and communicate IT’s transaction value to the business.

    • One-Pager: M&A Execution & Value Realization – Sell
    • Case Study: M&A Execution & Value Realization – Sell

    Infographic

    Workshop: Mergers & Acquisitions: The Sell Blueprint

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Pre-Transaction Discovery & Strategy

    The Purpose

    Establish the transaction foundation.

    Discover the motivation for divesting or selling.

    Formalize the program plan.

    Create the valuation framework.

    Strategize the transaction and finalize the M&A strategy and approach.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    All major stakeholders are on the same page.

    Set up crucial elements to facilitate the success of the transaction.

    Have a repeatable transaction strategy that can be reused for multiple organizations.

    Activities

    1.1 Conduct the CIO Business Vision and CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostics.

    1.2 Identify key stakeholders and outline their relationship to the M&A process.

    1.3 Understand the rationale for the company's decision to pursue a divestiture or sale.

    1.4 Assess the IT/digital strategy.

    1.5 Identify pain points and opportunities tied to the divestiture/sale.

    1.6 Create the IT vision statement and mission statement and identify IT guiding principles and the transition team.

    1.7 Document the M&A governance.

    1.8 Establish program metrics.

    1.9 Create the valuation framework.

    1.10 Establish the separation strategy.

    1.11 Conduct a RACI.

    1.12 Create the communication plan.

    1.13 Prepare to assess target organizations.

    Outputs

    Business perspectives of IT

    Stakeholder network map for M&A transactions

    Business context implications for IT

    IT’s divestiture/sale strategic direction

    Governance structure

    M&A program metrics

    IT valuation framework

    Separation strategy

    RACI

    Communication plan

    Prepared to assess target organization(s)

    2 Mid-Transaction Due Diligence & Preparation

    The Purpose

    Establish the foundation.

    Discover the motivation for separation.

    Identify expectations and create the carve-out roadmap.

    Prepare and manage employees.

    Plan the separation roadmap.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    All major stakeholders are on the same page.

    Methodology identified to enable compliance during due diligence.

    Employees are set up for a smooth and successful transition.

    Separation activities are planned and assigned.

    Activities

    2.1 Gather and evaluate the stakeholders involved, M&A strategy, future-state operating model, and governance.

    2.2 Review the business rationale for the divestiture/sale.

    2.3 Establish the separation strategy.

    2.4 Create the due diligence charter.

    2.5 Create a list of IT artifacts to be reviewed in the data room.

    2.6 Create a carve-out roadmap.

    2.7 Create a service/technical transaction agreement.

    2.8 Measure staff engagement.

    2.9 Assess the current culture and identify the goal culture.

    2.10 Create employee transition and functional workplans.

    2.11 Establish the separation roadmap.

    2.12 Establish and align project metrics with identified tasks.

    2.13 Estimate integration costs.

    Outputs

    Stakeholder map

    IT strategy assessed

    IT operating model and IT governance structure defined

    Business context implications for IT

    Separation strategy

    Due diligence charter

    Data room artifacts

    Carve-out roadmap

    Service/technical transaction agreement

    Engagement assessment

    Culture assessment

    Employee transition and functional workplans

    Integration roadmap and associated resourcing

    3 Post-Transaction Execution & Value Realization

    The Purpose

    Establish the transaction foundation.

    Discover the motivation for separation.

    Plan the separation roadmap.

    Prepare employees for the transition.

    Engage in separation.

    Assess the transaction outcomes.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    All major stakeholders are on the same page.

    Separation activities are planned and assigned.

    Employees are set up for a smooth and successful transition.

    Separation strategy and roadmap are executed to benefit the organization.

    Review what went well and identify improvements to be made in future transactions.

    Activities

    3.1 Identify key stakeholders and outline their relationship to the M&A process.

    3.2 Gather and evaluate the M&A strategy, future-state operating model, and governance.

    3.3 Review the business rationale for the divestiture/sale.

    3.4 Establish the separation strategy.

    3.5 Prioritize separation tasks.

    3.6 Establish the separation roadmap.

    3.7 Establish and align project metrics with identified tasks.

    3.8 Estimate separation costs.

    3.9 Measure staff engagement.

    3.10 Assess the current culture and identify the goal culture.

    3.11 Create employee transition and functional workplans.

    3.12 Complete the separation by regularly updating the project plan.

    3.13 Assess the service/technical transaction agreement.

    3.14 Confirm separation costs.

    3.15 Review IT’s transaction value.

    3.16 Conduct a transaction and separation SWOT.

    3.17 Review the playbook and prepare for future transactions.

    Outputs

    M&A transaction team

    Stakeholder map

    IT strategy assessed

    IT operating model and IT governance structure defined

    Business context implications for IT

    Separation strategy

    Separation roadmap and associated resourcing

    Engagement assessment

    Culture assessment

    Employee transition and functional workplans

    Updated separation project plan

    Evaluated service/technical transaction agreement

    SWOT of transaction

    M&A Sell Playbook refined for future transactions

    Further reading

    Mergers & Acquisitions: The Sell Blueprint

    For IT leaders who want to have a role in the transaction process when their business is engaging in an M&A sale or divestiture.

    EXECUTIVE BRIEF

    Analyst Perspective

    Don’t wait to be invited to the M&A table, make it.

    Photo of Brittany Lutes, Research Analyst, CIO Practice, Info-Tech Research Group.
    Brittany Lutes
    Research Analyst,
    CIO Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Photo of Ibrahim Abdel-Kader, Research Analyst, CIO Practice, Info-Tech Research Group.
    Ibrahim Abdel-Kader
    Research Analyst,
    CIO Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    IT has always been an afterthought in the M&A process, often brought in last minute once the deal is nearly, if not completely, solidified. This is a mistake. When IT is brought into the process late, the business misses opportunities to generate value related to the transaction and has less awareness of critical risks or inaccuracies.

    To prevent this mistake, IT leadership needs to develop strong business relationships and gain respect for their innovative suggestions. In fact, when it comes to modern M&A activity, IT should be the ones suggesting potential transactions to meet business needs, specifically when it comes to modernizing the business or adopting digital capabilities.

    IT needs to stop waiting to be invited to the acquisition or divestiture table. IT needs to suggest that the table be constructed and actively work toward achieving the strategic objectives of the business.

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    There are four key scenarios or entry points for IT as the selling/divesting organization in M&As:

    • IT can suggest a divestiture to meet the business objectives of the organization.
    • IT is brought in to strategy plan the sale/divestiture from both the business’ and IT’s perspectives.
    • IT participates in due diligence activities and complies with the purchasing organization’s asks.
    • IT needs to reactively prepare its environment to enable the separation.

    Consider the ideal scenario for your IT organization.

    Common Obstacles

    Some of the obstacles IT faces include:

    • IT is often told about the transaction once the deal has already been solidified and is now forced to meet unrealistic business demands.
    • The business does not trust IT and therefore does not approach IT to define value or reduce risks to the transaction process.
    • The people and culture element is forgotten or not given adequate priority.

    These obstacles often arise when IT waits to be invited into the transaction process and misses critical opportunities.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    Prepare for a sale/divestiture transaction by:

    • Recognizing the trend for organizations to engage in M&A activity and the increased likelihood that, as an IT leader, you will be involved in a transaction in your career.
    • Creating a standard strategy that will enable strong program management.
    • Properly considering all the critical components of the transaction and integration by prioritizing tasks that will reduce risk, deliver value, and meet stakeholder expectations.

    Info-Tech Insight

    As the number of merger, acquisition, and divestiture transactions continues to increase, so too does IT’s opportunity to leverage the growing digital nature of these transactions and get involved at the onset.

    The changing M&A landscape

    Businesses will embrace more digital M&A transactions in the post-pandemic world

    • When the pandemic occurred, businesses reacted by either pausing (61%) or completely cancelling (46%) deals that were in the mid-transaction state (Deloitte, 2020). The uncertainty made many organizations consider whether the risks would be worth the potential benefits.
    • However, many organizations quickly realized the pandemic is not a hindrance to M&A transactions but an opportunity. Over 16,000 American companies were involved in M&A transactions in the first six months of 2021 (The Economist). For reference, this had been averaging around 10,000 per six months from 2016 to 2020.
    • In addition to this transaction growth, organizations have increasingly been embracing digital. These trends increase the likelihood that, as an IT leader, you will engage in an M&A transaction. However, it is up to you when you get involved in the transactions.

    The total value of transactions in the year after the pandemic started was $1.3 billion – a 93% increase in value compared to before the pandemic. (Nasdaq)

    71% of technology companies anticipate that divestitures will take place as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. (EY, 2020)

    Your challenge

    IT is often not involved in the M&A transaction process. When it is, it’s often too late.

    • The most important driver of an acquisition is the ability to access new technology (DLA Piper), and yet 50% of the time, IT isn’t involved in the M&A transaction at all (IMAA Institute, 2017).
    • Additionally, IT’s lack of involvement in the process negatively impacts the business:
      • Most organizations (60%) do not have a standardized approach to integration (Steeves and Associates), let alone separation.
      • Two-thirds of the time, the divesting organization and acquiring organization will either fail together or succeed together (McKinsey, 2015).
      • Less than half (47%) of organizations actually experience the positive results sought by the M&A transaction (Steeves and Associates).
    • Organizations pursuing M&A and not involving IT are setting themselves up for failure.

    Only half of M&A deals involve IT (Source: IMAA Institute, 2017)

    Common Obstacles

    These barriers make this challenge difficult to address for many organizations:

    • IT is rarely afforded the opportunity to participate in the transaction deal. When IT is invited, this often happens later in the process where separation will be critical to business continuity.
    • IT has not had the opportunity to demonstrate that it is a valuable business partner in other business initiatives.
    • One of the most critical elements that IT often doesn’t take the time or doesn’t have the time to focus on is the people and leadership component.
    • IT waits to be invited to the process rather then actively involving themselves and suggesting how value can be added to the process.

    In hindsight, it’s clear to see: Involving IT is just good business.

    47% of senior leaders wish they would have spent more time on IT due diligence to prevent value erosion. (Source: IMAA Institute, 2017)

    “Solutions exist that can save well above 50 percent on divestiture costs, while ensuring on-time delivery.” (Source: SNP)

    Info-Tech's approach

    Acquisitions & Divestitures Framework

    Acquisitions and divestitures are inevitable in modern business, and IT’s involvement in the process should be too. This progression is inspired by:

    1. The growing trend for organizations to increase, decrease, or evolve through these types of transactions.
    2. Transactions that are driven by digital motivations, requiring IT’s expertise.
    3. A maturing business perspective of IT, preventing the difficulty that IT is faced with when invited into the transaction process late.
    4. There never being such a thing as a true merger, making the majority of M&A activity either acquisitions or divestitures.
    A diagram highlighting the 'IT Executives' Role in Acquisitions and Divestitures' when they are integrated at different points in the 'Core Business Timeline'. There are four main entry points 'Proactive', 'Discovery and Strategy', 'Due Diligence and Preparation', and 'Execution and Value Realized'. It is highlighted that IT can and should start at 'Proactive', but most organizations start at 'Execution and Value Realized'. 'Proactive': suggest opportunities to evolve the organization; prove IT's value and engage in growth opportunities early. Innovators start here. Steps of the business timeline in 'Proactive' are 'Organization strategies are defined' and 'M and A is considered to enable strategy'. After a buy or sell transaction is initiated is 'Discovery and Strategy': pre-transaction state. If it is a Buy transaction, 'Establish IT's involvement and approach'. If it is a Sell transaction, 'Prepare to engage in negotiations'. Business Partners start here. Steps of the business timeline in 'Discovery and Strategy' are 'Searching criteria is set', 'Potential candidates are considered', and 'LOI is sent/received'. 'Due Diligence and Preparation': mid-transaction state. If it is a Buy transaction, 'Identify potential transaction benefits and risks'. If it is a Sell transaction, 'Comply, communicate, and collaborate in transaction'. Trusted Operators start here. Steps of the business timeline in 'Due Diligence and Preparation' are 'Due diligence engagement occurs', 'Final agreement is reached', and 'Preparation for transaction execution occurs'. 'Execution and Value Realization': post-transaction state. If it is a Buy transaction, 'Integrate the IT environments and achieve business value'. If it is a Sell transaction, 'Separate the IT environment and deliver on transaction terms'. Firefighters start here. Steps of the business timeline in 'Execution and Value Realization' are 'Staff and operations are addressed appropriately', 'Day 1 of implementation and integration activities occurs', '1st 100 days of new entity state occur' and 'Ongoing risk mitigating and value creating activities occur'.

    The business’ view of IT will impact how soon IT can get involved

    There are four key entry points for IT

    A colorful visualization of the four key entry points for IT and a fifth not-so-key entry point. Starting from the top: 'Innovator', Information and Technology as a Competitive Advantage, 90% Satisfaction; 'Business Partner', Effective Delivery of Strategic Business Projects, 80% Satisfaction; 'Trusted Operator', Enablement of Business Through Application and Work Orders, 70% Satisfaction; 'Firefighter', Reliable Infrastructure and IT Service Desk, 60% Satisfaction; and then 'Unstable', Inability to Consistently Deliver Basic Services, <60% Satisfaction.
    1. Innovator: IT suggests a sale or divestiture to meet the business objectives of the organization.
    2. Business Partner: IT is brought in to strategy plan the sale/divestiture from both the business’ and IT’s perspective.
    3. Trusted Operator: IT participates in due diligence activities and complies with the purchasing organization’s asks.
    4. Firefighter: IT needs to reactively prepare its environment in order to enable the separation.

    Merger, acquisition, and divestiture defined

    Merger

    A merger looks at the equal combination of two entities or organizations. Mergers are rare in the M&A space, as the organizations will combine assets and services in a completely equal 50/50 split. Two organizations may also choose to divest business entities and merge as a new company.

    Acquisition

    The most common transaction in the M&A space, where an organization will acquire or purchase another organization or entities of another organization. This type of transaction has a clear owner who will be able to make legal decisions regarding the acquired organization.

    Divestiture

    An organization may decide to sell partial elements of a business to an acquiring organization. They will separate this business entity from the rest of the organization and continue to operate the other components of the business.

    Info-Tech Insight

    A true merger does not exist, as there is always someone initiating the discussion. As a result, most M&A activity falls into acquisition or divestiture categories.

    Selling vs. buying

    The M&A process approach differs depending on whether you are the selling or buying organization

    This blueprint is only focused on the sell side:

    • Examples of sell-related scenarios include:
      • Your organization is selling to another organization with the intent of keeping its regular staff, operations, and location. This could mean minimal separation is required.
      • Your organization is selling to another organization with the intent of separating to be a part of the purchasing organization.
      • Your organization is engaging in a divestiture with the intent of:
        • Separating components to be part of the purchasing organization permanently.
        • Separating components to be part of a spinoff and establish a unit as a standalone new company.
    • As the selling organization, you could proactively seek out suitors to purchase all or components of your organization, or you could be approached by an organization.

    The buy side is focused on:

    • More than two organizations could be involved in a transaction.
    • Examples of buy-related scenarios include:
      • Your organization is buying another organization with the intent of having the purchased organization keep its regular staff, operations, and location. This could mean minimal integration is required.
      • Your organization is buying another organization in its entirety with the intent of integrating it into your original company.
      • Your organization is buying components of another organization with the intent of integrating them into your original company.
    • As the purchasing organization, you will probably be initiating the purchase and thus will be valuating the selling organization during due diligence and leading the execution plan.

    For more information on acquisitions or purchases, check out Info-Tech’s Mergers & Acquisitions: The Buy Blueprint.

    Core business timeline

    For IT to be valuable in M&As, you need to align your deliverables and your support to the key activities the business and investors are working on.

    Info-Tech’s methodology for Selling Organizations in Mergers, Acquisitions, or Divestitures

    1. Proactive

    2. Discovery & Strategy

    3. Due Diligence & Preparation

    4. Execution & Value Realization

    Phase Steps

    1. Identify Stakeholders and Their Perspective of IT
    2. Assess IT’s Current Value and Future State
    3. Drive Innovation and Suggest Growth Opportunities
    1. Establish the M&A Program Plan
    2. Prepare IT to Engage in the Separation or Sale
    1. Engage in Due Diligence and Prepare Staff
    2. Prepare to Separate
    1. Execute the Transaction
    2. Reflection and Value Realization

    Phase Outcomes

    Be an innovative IT leader by suggesting how and why the business should engage in an acquisition or divestiture.

    Create a standardized approach for how your IT organization should address divestitures or sales.

    Comply with due diligence, prepare the IT environment for carve-out possibilities, and establish the separation project plan.

    Deliver on the separation project plan successfully and communicate IT’s transaction value to the business.

    Metrics for each phase

    1. Proactive

    2. Discovery & Strategy

    3. Valuation & Due Diligence

    4. Execution & Value Realization

    • % Share of business innovation spend from overall IT budget
    • % Critical processes with approved performance goals and metrics
    • % IT initiatives that meet or exceed value expectation defined in business case
    • % IT initiatives aligned with organizational strategic direction
    • % Satisfaction with IT's strategic decision-making abilities
    • $ Estimated business value added through IT-enabled innovation
    • % Overall stakeholder satisfaction with IT
    • % Percent of business leaders that view IT as an Innovator
    • % IT budget as a percent of revenue
    • % Assets that are not allocated
    • % Unallocated software licenses
    • # Obsolete assets
    • % IT spend that can be attributed to the business (chargeback or showback)
    • % Share of CapEx of overall IT budget
    • % Prospective organizations that meet the search criteria
    • $ Total IT cost of ownership (before and after M&A, before and after rationalization)
    • % Business leaders that view IT as a Business Partner
    • % Defects discovered in production
    • $ Cost per user for enterprise applications
    • % In-house-built applications vs. enterprise applications
    • % Owners identified for all data domains
    • # IT staff asked to participate in due diligence
    • Change to due diligence
    • IT budget variance
    • Synergy target
    • % Satisfaction with the effectiveness of IT capabilities
    • % Overall end-customer satisfaction
    • $ Impact of vendor SLA breaches
    • $ Savings through cost-optimization efforts
    • $ Savings through application rationalization and technology standardization
    • # Key positions empty
    • % Frequency of staff turnover
    • % Emergency changes
    • # Hours of unplanned downtime
    • % Releases that cause downtime
    • % Incidents with identified problem record
    • % Problems with identified root cause
    • # Days from problem identification to root cause fix
    • % Projects that consider IT risk
    • % Incidents due to issues not addressed in the security plan
    • # Average vulnerability remediation time
    • % Application budget spent on new build/buy vs. maintenance (deferred feature implementation, enhancements, bug fixes)
    • # Time (days) to value realization
    • % Projects that realized planned benefits
    • $ IT operational savings and cost reductions that are related to synergies/divestitures
    • % IT staff–related expenses/redundancies
    • # Days spent on IT separation
    • $ Accurate IT budget estimates
    • % Revenue growth directly tied to IT delivery
    • % Profit margin growth

    IT's role in the selling transaction

    And IT leaders have a greater likelihood than ever of needing to support a merger, acquisition, or divestiture.

    1. Reduced Risk

      IT can identify risks that may go unnoticed when IT is not involved.
    2. Increased Accuracy

      The business can make accurate predictions around the costs, timelines, and needs of IT.
    3. Faster Integration

      Faster integration means faster value realization for the business.
    4. Informed Decision Making

      IT leaders hold critical information that can support the business in moving the transaction forward.
    5. Innovation

      IT can suggest new opportunities to generate revenue, optimize processes, or reduce inefficiencies.

    The IT executive’s critical role is demonstrated by:

    • Reduced Risk

      47% of senior leaders wish they would have spent more time on IT due diligence to prevent value erosion (IMAA Institute, 2017).
    • Increased Accuracy

      Sellers often only provide 15 to 30 days for the acquiring organization to decide (Forbes, 2018), increasing the necessity of accurate pricing.
    • Faster Integration

      36% of CIOs have visibility into only business unit data, making the divestment a challenge (EY, 2021).
    • Informed Decision Making

      Only 38% of corporate and 22% of private equity firms include IT as a significant aspect in their transaction approach (IMAA Institute, 2017).
    • Innovation

      Successful CIOs involved in M&As can spend 70% of their time on aspects outside of IT and 30% of their time on technology and delivery (CIO).

    Playbook benefits

    IT Benefits

    • IT will be seen as an innovative partner to the business, and its suggestions and involvement in the organization will lead to benefits, not hindrances.
    • Develop a streamlined method to prepare the IT environment for potential carve-out and separations, ensuring risk management concerns are brought to the business’ attention immediately.
    • Create a comprehensive list of items that IT needs to do during the separation that can be prioritized and actioned.

    Business Benefits

    • The business will get accurate and relevant information about its IT environment in order to sell or divest the company to the highest bidder for a true price.
    • Fewer business interruptions will happen, because IT can accurately plan for and execute the high-priority separation tasks.
    • The business can obtain a high-value offer for the components of IT being sold and can measure the ongoing value the sale will bring.

    Insight summary

    Overarching Insight

    IT controls if and when it gets invited to support the business through a purchasing growth transaction. Take control of the process, demonstrate the value of IT, and ensure that separation of IT environments does not lead to unnecessary and costly decisions.

    Proactive Insight

    CIOs on the forefront of digital transformation need to actively look for and suggest opportunities to acquire or partner on new digital capabilities to respond to rapidly changing business needs.

    Discovery & Strategy Insight

    IT organizations that have an effective M&A program plan are more prepared for the transaction, enabling a successful outcome. A structured strategy is particularly necessary for organizations expected to deliver M&As rapidly and frequently.

    Due Diligence & Preparation Insight

    IT often faces unnecessary separation challenges because of a lack of preparation. Secure the IT environment and establish how IT will retain employees early in the transaction process.

    Execution & Value Realization Insight

    IT needs to demonstrate value and cost savings within 100 days of the transaction. The most successful transactions are when IT continuously realizes synergies a year after the transaction and beyond.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Key Deliverable: M&A Sell Playbook

    The M&A Sell Playbook should be a reusable document that enables your IT organization to successfully deliver on any divestiture transaction.

    Screenshots of the 'M and A Sell Playbook' deliverable.

    M&A Sell One-Pager

    See a one-page overview of each phase of the transaction.

    Screenshots of the 'M and A Sell One-Pagers' deliverable.

    M&A Sell Case Studies

    Read a one-page case study for each phase of the transaction.

    Screenshots of the 'M and A Sell Case Studies' deliverable.

    M&A Separation Project Management Tool (SharePoint)

    Manage the separation process of the divestiture/sale using this SharePoint template.

    Screenshots of the 'M and A Separation Project Management Tool (SharePoint)' deliverable.

    M&A Separation Project Management Tool (Excel)

    Manage the separation process of the divestiture/sale using this Excel tool if you can’t or don’t want to use SharePoint.

    Screenshots of the 'M and A Separation Project Management Tool (Excel)' deliverable.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is between 6 to 10 calls over the course of 2 to 4 months.

      Proactive Phase

    • Call #1: Scope requirements, objectives, and your specific challenges.
    • Discovery & Strategy Phase

    • Call #2: Determine stakeholders and business perspectives on IT.
    • Call #3: Identify how M&A could support business strategy and how to communicate.
    • Due Diligence & Preparation Phase

    • Call #4: Establish a transaction team and divestiture/sale strategic direction.
    • Call #5: Create program metrics and identify a standard separation strategy.
    • Call #6: Prepare to carve out the IT environment.
    • Call #7: Identify the separation program plan.
    • Execution & Value Realization Phase

    • Call #8: Establish employee transitions to retain key staff.
    • Call #9: Assess IT’s ability to deliver on the divestiture/sale transaction.

    The Sell Blueprint

    Phase 1

    Proactive

    Phase 1

    Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4
    • 1.1 Identify Stakeholders and Their Perspective of IT
    • 1.2 Assess IT’s Current Value and Future State
    • 1.3 Drive Innovation and Suggest Reduction Opportunities
    • 2.1 Establish the M&A Program Plan
    • 2.2 Prepare IT to Engage in the Separation or Sale
    • 3.1 Engage in Due Diligence and Prepare Staff
    • 3.2 Prepare to Separate
    • 4.1 Execute the Transaction
    • 4.2 Reflection and Value Realization

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Conduct the CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostic
    • Conduct the CIO Business Vision diagnostic
    • Visualize relationships among stakeholders to identify key influencers
    • Group stakeholders into categories
    • Prioritize your stakeholders
    • Plan to communicate
    • Valuate IT
    • Assess the IT/digital strategy
    • Determine pain points and opportunities
    • Align goals to opportunities
    • Recommend reduction opportunities

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • IT and business leadership

    What is the Proactive phase?

    Embracing the digital drivers

    As the number of merger, acquisition, or divestiture transactions driven by digital means continues to increase, IT has an opportunity to not just be involved in a transaction but actively seek out potential deals.

    In the Proactive phase, the business is not currently considering a transaction. However, the business could consider one to reach its strategic goals. IT organizations that have developed respected relationships with the business leaders can suggest these potential transactions.

    Understand the business’ perspective of IT, determine who the critical M&A stakeholders are, valuate the IT environment, and examine how it supports the business goals in order to suggest an M&A transaction.

    In doing so, IT isn’t waiting to be invited to the transaction table – it’s creating it.

    Goal: To support the organization in reaching its strategic goals by suggesting M&A activities that will enable the organization to reach its objectives faster and with greater-value outcomes.

    Proactive Prerequisite Checklist

    Before coming into the Proactive phase, you should have addressed the following:

    • Understand what mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures are.
    • Understand what mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures mean for the business.
    • Understand what mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures mean for IT.

    Review the Executive Brief for more information on mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures for selling organizations.

    Proactive

    Step 1.1

    Identify M&A Stakeholders and Their Perspective of IT

    Activities

    • 1.1.1 Conduct the CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostic
    • 1.1.2 Conduct the CIO Business Vision diagnostic
    • 1.1.3 Visualize relationships among stakeholders to identify key influencers
    • 1.1.4 Group stakeholders into categories
    • 1.1.5 Prioritize your stakeholders
    • 1.16 Plan to communicate

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive leader
    • IT leadership
    • Critical M&A stakeholders

    Outcomes of Step

    Understand how the business perceives IT and establish strong relationships with critical M&A stakeholders.

    Business executives' perspectives of IT

    Leverage diagnostics and gain alignment on IT’s role in the organization

    • To suggest or get involved with a merger, acquisition, or divestiture, the IT executive leader needs to be well respected by other members of the executive leadership team and the business.
    • Specifically, the Proactive phase relies on the IT organization being viewed as an Innovator within the business.
    • Identify how the CEO/business executive currently views IT and where they would like IT to move within the Maturity Ladder.
    • Additionally, understand how other critical department leaders view IT and how they view the partnership with IT.
    A colorful visualization titled 'Maturity Ladder' detailing levels of IT function that a business may choose from based on the business executives' perspectives of IT. Starting from the bottom: 'Struggle', Does not embarrass, Does not crash; 'Support', Keeps business happy, Keeps costs low; 'Optimize', Increases efficiency, Decreases costs; 'Expand', Extends into new business, Generates revenue; 'Transform', Creates new industry.

    Misalignment in target state requires further communication between the CIO and CEO to ensure IT is striving toward an agreed-upon direction.

    Info-Tech’s CIO Business Vision (CIO BV) diagnostic measures a variety of high-value metrics to provide a well-rounded understanding of stakeholder satisfaction with IT.

    Sample of Info-Tech's CIO Business Vision diagnostic measuring percentages of high-value metrics like 'IT Satisfaction' and 'IT Value' regarding business leader satisfaction. A note for these two reads 'Evaluate business leader satisfaction with IT this year and last year'. A section titled 'Relationship' has metrics such as 'Understands Needs' and 'Trains Effectively'. A note for this section reads 'Examine relationship indicators between IT and the business'. A section titled 'Security Friction' has metrics such as 'Regulatory Compliance-Driven' and 'Office/Desktop Security'.

    Business Satisfaction and Importance for Core Services

    The core services of IT are important when determining what IT should focus on. The most important services with the lowest satisfaction offer the largest area of improvement for IT to drive business value.

    Sample of Info-Tech's CIO Business Vision diagnostic specifically comparing the business satisfaction of 12 core services with their importance. Services listed include 'Service Desk', 'IT Security', 'Requirements Gathering', 'Business Apps', 'Data Quality', and more. There is a short description of the services, a percentage for the business satisfaction with the service, a percentage comparing it to last year, and a numbered ranking of importance for each service. A note reads 'Assess satisfaction and importance across 12 core IT capabilities'.

    1.1.1 Conduct the CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostic

    2 weeks

    Input: IT organization expertise and the CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostic

    Output: An understanding of an executive business stakeholder’s perception of IT

    Materials: M&A Sell Playbook, CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostic

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, Business executive/CEO

    1. The CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostic can be a powerful input. Speak with your Info-Tech account representative to conduct the diagnostic. Use the results to inform current IT capabilities.
    2. You may choose to debrief the results of your diagnostic with an Info-Tech analyst. We recommend this to help your team understand how to interpret and draw conclusions from the results.
    3. Examine the results of the survey and note where there might be specific capabilities that could be improved.
    4. Determine whether there are any areas of significant disagreement between the you and the CEO. Mark down those areas for further conversations. Additionally, take note of areas that could be leveraged to support transactions or support your rationale in recommending transactions.

    Download the sample report.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    1.1.2 Conduct the CIO Business Vision diagnostic

    2 weeks

    Input: IT organization expertise, CIO BV diagnostic

    Output: An understanding of business stakeholder perception of certain IT capabilities and services

    Materials: M&A Buy Playbook, CIO Business Vision diagnostic

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, Senior business leaders

    1. The CIO Business Vision (CIO BV) diagnostic can be a powerful tool for identifying IT capability focus areas. Speak with your account representative to conduct the CIO BV diagnostic. Use the results to inform current IT capabilities.
    2. You may choose to debrief the results of your diagnostic with an Info-Tech analyst. We recommend this to help your team understand how to interpret the results and draw conclusions from the diagnostic.
    3. Examine the results of the survey and take note of any IT services that have low scores.
    4. Read through the diagnostic comments and note any common themes. Especially note which stakeholders identified they have a favorable relationship with IT and which stakeholders identified they have an unfavorable relationship. For those who have an unfavorable relationship, identify if they will have a critical role in a growth transaction.

    Download the sample report.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Create a stakeholder network map for M&A transactions

    Follow the trail of breadcrumbs from your direct stakeholders to their influencers to uncover hidden stakeholders.

    Example:

    Diagram of stakeholders and their relationships with other stakeholders, such as 'Board Members', 'CFO/Finance', 'Compliance', etc. with 'CIO/IT Leader' highlighted in the middle. There are unidirectional black arrows and bi-directional green arrows indicating each connection.

      Legend
    • Black arrows indicate the direction of professional influence
    • Dashed green arrows indicate bidirectional, informal influence relationships

    Info-Tech Insight

    Your stakeholder map defines the influence landscape that the M&A transaction will occur within. This will identify who holds various levels of accountability and decision-making authority when a transaction does take place.

    Use connectors to determine who may be influencing your direct stakeholders. They may not have any formal authority within the organization, but they may have informal yet substantial relationships with your stakeholders.

    1.1.3 Visualize relationships among stakeholders to identify key influencers

    1-3 hours

    Input: List of M&A stakeholders

    Output: Relationships among M&A stakeholders and influencers

    Materials: Flip charts, Markers, Sticky notes, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive leadership

    1. The purpose of this activity is to list all the stakeholders within your organization that will have a direct or indirect impact on the M&A transaction.
    2. Determine the critical stakeholders, and then determine the stakeholders of your stakeholders and consider adding each of them to the stakeholder list.
    3. Assess who has either formal or informal influence over your stakeholders; add these influencers to your stakeholder list.
    4. Construct a diagram linking stakeholders and their influencers together.
      • Use black arrows to indicate the direction of professional influence.
      • Use dashed green arrows to indicate bidirectional, informal influence relationships.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Categorize your stakeholders with a prioritization map

    A stakeholder prioritization map helps IT leaders categorize their stakeholders by their level of influence and ownership in the merger, acquisition, or divestiture process.

    A prioritization map of stakeholder categories split into four quadrants. The vertical axis is 'Influence', from low on the bottom to high on top. The horizontal axis is 'Ownership/Interest', from low on the left to high on the right. 'Spectators' are low influence, low ownership/interest. 'Mediators' are high influence, low ownership/interest. 'Noisemakers' are low influence, high ownership/interest. 'Players' are high influence, high ownership/interest.

    There are four areas in the map, and the stakeholders within each area should be treated differently.

    Players – players have a high interest in the initiative and the influence to effect change over the initiative. Their support is critical, and a lack of support can cause significant impediment to the objectives.

    Mediators – mediators have a low interest but significant influence over the initiative. They can help to provide balance and objective opinions to issues that arise.

    Noisemakers – noisemakers have low influence but high interest. They tend to be very vocal and engaged, either positively or negatively, but have little ability to enact their wishes.

    Spectators – generally, spectators are apathetic and have little influence over or interest in the initiative.

    1.1.4 Group stakeholders into categories

    30 minutes

    Input: Stakeholder map, Stakeholder list

    Output: Categorization of stakeholders and influencers

    Materials: Flip charts, Markers, Sticky notes, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive leadership, Stakeholders

    1. Identify your stakeholders’ interest in and influence on the M&A process as high, medium, or low by rating the attributes below.
    2. Map your results to the model to the right to determine each stakeholder’s category.

    Same prioritization map of stakeholder categories as before. This one has specific stakeholders mapped onto it. 'CFO' is mapped as low interest and middling influence, between 'Mediator' and 'Spectator'. 'CIO' is mapped as higher than average interest and high influence, a 'Player'. 'Board Member' is mapped as high interest and high influence, a 'Player'.

    Level of Influence
    • Power: Ability of a stakeholder to effect change.
    • Urgency: Degree of immediacy demanded.
    • Legitimacy: Perceived validity of stakeholder’s claim.
    • Volume: How loud their “voice” is or could become.
    • Contribution: What they have that is of value to you.
    Level of Interest

    How much are the stakeholder’s individual performance and goals directly tied to the success or failure of the product?

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Prioritize your stakeholders

    There may be too many stakeholders to be able to manage them all. Focus your attention on the stakeholders that matter most.

    Level of Support

    Supporter

    Evangelist

    Neutral

    Blocker

    Stakeholder Category Player Critical High High Critical
    Mediator Medium Low Low Medium
    Noisemaker High Medium Medium High
    Spectator Low Irrelevant Irrelevant Low

    Consider the three dimensions for stakeholder prioritization: influence, interest, and support. Support can be determined by answering the following question: How significant is that stakeholder to the M&A or divestiture process?

    These parameters are used to prioritize which stakeholders are most important and should receive your focused attention.

    1.1.5 Prioritize your stakeholders

    30 minutes

    Input: Stakeholder matrix

    Output: Stakeholder and influencer prioritization

    Materials: Flip charts, Markers, Sticky notes, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive leadership, M&A/divestiture stakeholders

    1. Identify the level of support of each stakeholder by answering the following question: How significant is that stakeholder to the M&A transaction process?
    2. Prioritize your stakeholders using the prioritization scheme on the previous slide.

    Stakeholder

    Category

    Level of Support

    Prioritization

    CMO Spectator Neutral Irrelevant
    CIO Player Supporter Critical

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Define strategies for engaging stakeholders by type

    A revisit to the map of stakeholder categories, but with strategies listed for each one, and arrows on the side instead of an axis. The vertical arrow is 'Authority', which increases upward, and the horizontal axis is Ownership/Interest which increases as it moves to the right. The strategy for 'Players' is 'Engage', for 'Mediators' is 'Satisfy', for 'Noisemakers' is 'Inform', and for 'Spectators' is 'Monitor'.

    Type

    Quadrant

    Actions

    Players High influence, high interest – actively engage Keep them updated on the progress of the project. Continuously involve Players in the process and maintain their engagement and interest by demonstrating their value to its success.
    Mediators High influence, low interest – keep satisfied They can be the game changers in groups of stakeholders. Turn them into supporters by gaining their confidence and trust and including them in important decision-making steps. In turn, they can help you influence other stakeholders.
    Noisemakers Low influence, high interest – keep informed Try to increase their influence (or decrease it if they are detractors) by providing them with key information, supporting them in meetings, and using Mediators to help them.
    Spectators Low influence, low interest – monitor They are followers. Keep them in the loop by providing clarity on objectives and status updates.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Each group of stakeholders draws attention and resources away from critical tasks. By properly identifying stakeholder groups, the IT executive leader can develop corresponding actions to manage stakeholders in each group. This can dramatically reduce wasted effort trying to satisfy Spectators and Noisemakers while ensuring the needs of Mediators and Players are met.

    1.1.6 Plan to communicate

    30 minutes

    Input: Stakeholder priority, Stakeholder categorization, Stakeholder influence

    Output: Stakeholder communication plan

    Materials: Flip charts, Markers, Sticky notes, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive leadership, M&A/divestiture stakeholders

    The purpose of this activity is to make a communication plan for each of the stakeholders identified in the previous activities, especially those who will have a critical role in the M&A transaction process.

    1. In the M&A Sell Playbook, input the type of influence each stakeholder has on IT, how they would be categorized in the M&A process, and their level of priority. Use this information to create a communication plan.
    2. Determine the methods and frequency of communication to keep the necessary stakeholder satisfied and maintain or enhance IT’s profile within the organization.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Proactive

    Step 1.2

    Assess IT’s Current Value and Method to Achieve a Future State

    Activities

    • 1.2.1 Valuate IT
    • 1.2.2 Assess the IT/digital strategy

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive leader
    • IT leadership
    • Critical stakeholders to M&A

    Outcomes of Step

    Identify critical opportunities to optimize IT and meet strategic business goals through a merger, acquisition, or divestiture.

    How to valuate your IT environment

    And why it matters so much

    • Valuating your current organization’s IT environment is a critical step that all IT organizations should take, whether involved in an M&A or not, to fully understand what it might be worth.
    • The business investments in IT can be directly translated into a value amount. For every $1 invested in IT, the business might be gaining $100 in value back or possibly even loosing $100.
    • Determining, documenting, and communicating this information ensures that the business takes IT’s suggestions seriously and recognizes why investing in IT is so critical.
    • There are three ways a business or asset can be valuated:
      • Cost Approach: Look at the costs associated with building, purchasing, replacing, and maintaining a given aspect of the business.
      • Market Approach: Look at the relative value of a particular aspect of the business. Relative value can fluctuate and depends on what the markets and consequently society believe that particular element is worth.
      • Discounted Cash Flow Approach: Focus on what the potential value of the business could be or the intrinsic value anticipated due to future profitability.
    • (Source: “Valuation Methods,” Corporate Finance Institute)

    Four ways to create value through digital

    1. Reduced costs
    2. Improved customer experience
    3. New revenue sources
    4. Better decision making
    5. (Source: McKinsey & Company)

    1.2.1 Valuate IT

    1 day

    Input: Valuation of data, Valuation of applications, Valuation of infrastructure and operations, Valuation of security and risk

    Output: Valuation of IT

    Materials: Relevant templates/tools listed on the following slides, Capital budget, Operating budget, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership

    The purpose of this activity is to demonstrate that IT is not simply an operational functional area that diminishes business resources. Rather, IT contributes significant value to the business.

    1. Review each of the following slides to valuate IT’s data, applications, infrastructure and operations, and security and risk. These valuations consider several tangible and intangible factors and result in a final dollar amount.
    2. Input the financial amounts identified for each critical area into a summary slide. Use this information to determine where IT is delivering value to the organization.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Consistency is key when valuating your IT organization as well as other IT organizations throughout the transaction process.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Data valuation

    Data valuation identifies how you monetize the information that your organization owns.

    Create a data value chain for your organization

    When valuating the information and data that exists in an organization, there are many things to consider.

    Info-Tech has two tools that can support this process:

    1. Information Asset Audit Tool: Use this tool first to take inventory of the different information assets that exist in your organization.
    2. Data Valuation Tool: Once information assets have been accounted for, valuate the data that exists within those information assets.

    Data Collection

    Insight Creation

    Value Creation

    Data Valuation

    01 Data Source
    02 Data Collection Method
    03 Data
    04 Data Analysis
    05 Insight
    06 Insight Delivery
    07 Consumer
    08 Value in Data
    09 Value Dimension
    10 Value Metrics Group
    11 Value Metrics
    Screenshots of Tab 2 of Info-Tech's Data Valuation Tool.

    Instructions

    1. Using the Data Valuation Tool, start gathering information based on the eight steps above to understand your organization’s journey from data to value.
    2. Identify the data value spectrum. (For example: customer sales service, citizen licensing service, etc.)
    3. Fill out the columns for data sources, data collection, and data first.
    4. Capture data analysis and related information.
    5. Then capture the value in data.
    6. Add value dimensions such as usage, quality, and economic dimensions.
      • Remember that economic value is not the only dimension, and usage/quality has a significant impact on economic value.
    7. Collect evidence to justify your data valuation calculator (market research, internal metrics, etc.).
    8. Finally, calculate the value that has a direct correlation with underlying value metrics.

    Application valuation

    Calculate the value of your IT applications

    When valuating the applications and their users in an organization, consider using a business process map. This shows how business is transacted in the company by identifying which IT applications support these processes and which business groups have access to them. Info-Tech has a business process mapping tool that can support this process:

    • Enterprise Integration Process Mapping Tool: Complete this tool first to map the different business processes to the supporting applications in your organization.

    Instructions

    1. Start by calculating user costs. This is the multiplication of: (# of users) × (% of time spent using IT) × (fully burdened salary).
    2. Identify the revenue per employee and divide that by the average cost per employee to calculate the derived productivity ratio (DPR).
    3. Once you have calculated the user costs and DPR, multiply those total values together to get the application value.
    4. User Costs

      Total User Costs

      Derived Productivity Ratio (DPR)

      Total DPR

      Application Value

      # of users % time spent using IT Fully burdened salary Multiply values from the 3 user costs columns Revenue per employee Average cost per employee (Revenue P.E) ÷ (Average cost P.E) (User costs) X (DPR)

    5. Once the total application value is established, calculate the combined IT and business costs of delivering that value. IT and business costs include inflexibility (application maintenance), unavailability (downtime costs, including disaster exposure), IT costs (common costs statistically allocated to applications), and fully loaded cost of active (full-time equivalent [FTE]) users.
    6. Calculate the net value of applications by subtracting the total IT and business costs from the total application value calculated in step 3.
    7. IT and Business Costs

      Total IT and Business Costs

      Net Value of Applications

      Application maintenance Downtime costs (include disaster exposure) Common costs allocated to applications Fully loaded costs of active (FTE) users Sum of values from the four IT and business costs columns (Application value) – (IT and business costs)

    (Source: CSO)

    Infrastructure valuation

    Assess the foundational elements of the business’ information technology

    The purpose of this exercise is to provide a high-level infrastructure valuation that will contribute to valuating your IT environment.

    Calculating the value of the infrastructure will require different methods depending on the environment. For example, a fully cloud-hosted organization will have different costs than a fully on-premises IT environment.

    Instructions:

    1. Start by listing all of the infrastructure-related items that are relevant to your organization.
    2. Once you have finalized your items column, identify the total costs/value of each item.
      • For example, total software costs would include servers and storage.
    3. Calculate the total cost/value of your IT infrastructure by adding all of values in the right column.

    Item

    Costs/Value

    Hardware Assets Total Value +$3.2 million
    Hardware Leased/Service Agreement -$
    Software Purchased +$
    Software Leased/Service Agreement -$
    Operational Tools
    Network
    Disaster Recovery
    Antivirus
    Data Centers
    Service Desk
    Other Licenses
    Total:

    For additional support, download the M&A Runbook for Infrastructure and Operations.

    Risk and security

    Assess risk responses and calculate residual risk

    The purpose of this exercise is to provide a high-level risk assessment that will contribute to valuating your IT environment. For a more in-depth risk assessment, please refer to the Info-Tech tools below:

    1. Risk Register Tool
    2. Security M&A Due Diligence Tool

    Instructions

    1. Review the probability and impact scales below and ensure you have the appropriate criteria that align to your organization before you conduct a risk assessment.
    2. Identify the probability of occurrence and estimated financial impact for each risk category detail and fill out the table on the right. Customize the table as needed so it aligns to your organization.
    3. Probability of Risk Occurrence

      Occurrence Criteria
      (Classification; Probability of Risk Event Within One Year)

      Negligible Very Unlikely; ‹20%
      Very Low Unlikely; 20 to 40%
      Low Possible; 40 to 60%
      Moderately Low Likely; 60 to 80%
      Moderate Almost Certain; ›80%

    Note: If needed, you can customize this scale with the severity designations that you prefer. However, make sure you are always consistent with it when conducting a risk assessment.

    Financial & Reputational Impact

    Budgetary and Reputational Implications
    (Financial Impact; Reputational Impact)

    Negligible (‹$10,000; Internal IT stakeholders aware of risk event occurrence)
    Very Low ($10,000 to $25,000; Business customers aware of risk event occurrence)
    Low ($25,000 to $50,000; Board of directors aware of risk event occurrence)
    Moderately Low ($50,000 to $100,000; External customers aware of risk event occurrence)
    Moderate (›$100,000; Media coverage or regulatory body aware of risk event occurrence)

    Risk Category Details

    Probability of Occurrence

    Estimated Financial Impact

    Estimated Severity (Probability X Impact)

    Capacity Planning
    Enterprise Architecture
    Externally Originated Attack
    Hardware Configuration Errors
    Hardware Performance
    Internally Originated Attack
    IT Staffing
    Project Scoping
    Software Implementation Errors
    Technology Evaluation and Selection
    Physical Threats
    Resource Threats
    Personnel Threats
    Technical Threats
    Total:

    1.2.2 Assess the IT/digital strategy

    4 hours

    Input: IT strategy, Digital strategy, Business strategy

    Output: An understanding of an executive business stakeholder’s perception of IT, Alignment of IT/digital strategy and overall organization strategy

    Materials: Computer, Whiteboard and markers, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, Business executive/CEO

    The purpose of this activity is to review the business and IT strategies that exist to determine if there are critical capabilities that are not being supported.

    Ideally, the IT and digital strategies would have been created following development of the business strategy. However, sometimes the business strategy does not directly call out the capabilities it requires IT to support.

    1. On the left half of the corresponding slide in the M&A Sell Playbook, document the business goals, initiatives, and capabilities. Input this information from the business or digital strategies. (If more space for goals, initiatives, or capabilities is needed, duplicate the slide).
    2. On the other half of the slide, document the IT goals, initiatives, and capabilities. Input this information from the IT strategy and digital strategy.

    For additional support, see Build a Business-Aligned IT Strategy.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Proactive

    Step 1.3

    Drive Innovation and Suggest Growth Opportunities

    Activities

    • 1.3.1 Determine pain points and opportunities
    • 1.3.2 Align goals with opportunities
    • 1.3.3 Recommend reduction opportunities

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive leader
    • IT leadership
    • Critical M&A stakeholders

    Outcomes of Step

    Establish strong relationships with critical M&A stakeholders and position IT as an innovative business partner that can suggest reduction opportunities.

    1.3.1 Determine pain points and opportunities

    1-2 hours

    Input: CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostic, CIO Business Vision diagnostic, Valuation of IT environment, IT-business goals cascade

    Output: List of pain points or opportunities that IT can address

    Materials: Computer, Whiteboard and markers, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Business stakeholders

    The purpose of this activity is to determine the pain points and opportunities that exist for the organization. These can be external or internal to the organization.

    1. Identify what opportunities exist for your organization. Opportunities are the potential positives that the organization would want to leverage.
    2. Next, identify pain points, which are the potential negatives that the organization would want to alleviate.
    3. Spend time considering all the options that might exist, and keep in mind what has been identified previously.

    Opportunities and pain points can be trends, other departments’ initiatives, business perspectives of IT, etc.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    1.3.2 Align goals with opportunities

    1-2 hours

    Input: CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostic, CIO Business Vision diagnostic, Valuation of IT environment, IT-business goals cascade, List of pain points and opportunities

    Output: An understanding of an executive business stakeholder’s perception of IT, Foundations for reduction strategy

    Materials: Computer, Whiteboard and markers, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Business stakeholders

    The purpose of this activity is to determine whether a growth or separation strategy might be a good suggestion to the business in order to meet its business objectives.

    1. For the top three to five business goals, consider:
      1. Underlying drivers
      2. Digital opportunities
      3. Whether a growth or reduction strategy is the solution
    2. Just because a growth or reduction strategy is a solution for a business goal does not necessarily indicate M&A is the way to go. However, it is important to consider before you pursue suggesting M&A.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    1.3.3 Recommend reduction opportunities

    1-2 hours

    Input: Growth or separation strategy opportunities to support business goals, Stakeholder communication plan, Rationale for the suggestion

    Output: M&A transaction opportunities suggested

    Materials: M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, Business executive/CEO

    The purpose of this activity is to recommend a merger, acquisition, or divestiture to the business.

    1. Identify which of the business goals the transaction would help solve and why IT is the one to suggest such a goal.
    2. Leverage the stakeholder communication plan identified previously to give insight into stakeholders who would have a significant level of interest, influence, or support in the process.

    Info-Tech Insight

    With technology and digital driving many transactions, leverage your organizations’ IT environment as an asset and reason why the divestiture or sale should happen, suggesting the opportunity yourself.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    By the end of this Proactive phase, you should:

    Be prepared to suggest M&A opportunities to support your company’s goals through sale or divestiture transactions

    Key outcome from the Proactive phase

    Develop progressive relationships and strong communication with key stakeholders to suggest or be aware of transformational opportunities that can be achieved through sale or divestiture strategies.

    Key deliverables from the Proactive phase
    • Business perspective of IT examined
    • Key stakeholders identified and relationship to the M&A process outlined
    • Ability to valuate the IT environment and communicate IT’s value to the business
    • Assessment of the business, digital, and IT strategies and how M&As could support those strategies
    • Pain points and opportunities that could be alleviated or supported through an M&A transaction
    • Sale or divestiture recommendations

    The Sell Blueprint

    Phase 2

    Discovery & Strategy

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    Phase 3Phase 4
    • 1.1 Identify Stakeholders and Their Perspective of IT
    • 1.2 Assess IT’s Current Value and Future State
    • 1.3 Drive Innovation and Suggest Reduction Opportunities
    • 2.1 Establish the M&A Program Plan
    • 2.2 Prepare IT to Engage in the Separation or Sale
    • 3.1 Engage in Due Diligence and Prepare Staff
    • 3.2 Prepare to Separate
    • 4.1 Execute the Transaction
    • 4.2 Reflection and Value Realization

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Create the mission and vision
    • Identify the guiding principles
    • Create the future-state operating model
    • Determine the transition team
    • Document the M&A governance
    • Create program metrics
    • Establish the separation strategy
    • Conduct a RACI
    • Create the communication plan
    • Assess the potential organization(s)

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • IT executive/CIO
    • IT senior leadership
    • Company M&A team

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Pre-Work

    Day 1

    Day 2

    Day 3

    Day 4

    Day 5

    Establish the Transaction FoundationDiscover the Motivation for Divesting or SellingFormalize the Program PlanCreate the Valuation FrameworkStrategize the TransactionNext Steps and Wrap-Up (offsite)

    Activities

    • 0.1 Conduct the CIO Business Vision and CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostics
    • 0.2 Identify key stakeholders and outline their relationship to the M&A process
    • 0.3 Identify the rationale for the company's decision to pursue a divestiture or sale
    • 1.1 Review the business rationale for the divestiture/sale
    • 1.2 Assess the IT/digital strategy
    • 1.3 Identify pain points and opportunities tied to the divestiture/sale
    • 1.4 Create the IT vision statement, create the IT mission statement, and identify IT guiding principles
    • 2.1 Create the future-state operating model
    • 2.2 Determine the transition team
    • 2.3 Document the M&A governance
    • 2.4 Establish program metrics
    • 3.1 Valuate your data
    • 3.2 Valuate your applications
    • 3.3 Valuate your infrastructure
    • 3.4 Valuate your risk and security
    • 3.5 Combine individual valuations to make a single framework
    • 4.1 Establish the separation strategy
    • 4.2 Conduct a RACI
    • 4.3 Review best practices for assessing target organizations
    • 4.4 Create the communication plan
    • 5.1 Complete in-progress deliverables from previous four days
    • 5.2 Set up review time for workshop deliverables and to discuss next steps

    Deliverables

    1. Business perspectives of IT
    2. Stakeholder network map for M&A transactions
    1. Business context implications for IT
    2. IT’s divestiture/sale strategic direction
    1. Operating model for future state
    2. Transition team
    3. Governance structure
    4. M&A program metrics
    1. IT valuation framework
    1. Separation strategy
    2. RACI
    3. Communication plan
    1. Completed M&A program plan and strategy
    2. Prepared to assess target organization(s)

    What is the Discovery & Strategy phase?

    Pre-transaction state

    The Discovery & Strategy phase during a sale or divestiture is a unique opportunity for many IT organizations. IT organizations that can participate in the transaction at this stage are likely considered a strategic partner of the business.

    For one-off sales/divestitures, IT being invited during this stage of the process is rare. However, for organizations that are preparing to engage in many divestitures over the coming years, this type of strategy will greatly benefit from IT involvement. Again, the likelihood of participating in an M&A transaction is increasing, making it a smart IT leadership decision to, at the very least, loosely prepare a program plan that can act as a strategic pillar throughout the transaction.

    During this phase of the pre-transaction state, IT may be asked to participate in ensuring that the IT environment is able to quickly and easily carve out components/business lines and deliver on service-level agreements (SLAs).

    Goal: To identify a repeatable program plan that IT can leverage when selling or divesting all or parts of the current IT environment, ensuring customer satisfaction and business continuity

    Discovery & Strategy Prerequisite Checklist

    Before coming into the Discovery & Strategy phase, you should have addressed the following:

    • Understand the business perspective of IT.
    • Know the key stakeholders and have outlined their relationship to the M&A process.
    • Be able to valuate the IT environment and communicate IT's value to the business.
    • Understand the rationale for the company's decision to pursue a sale or divestiture and the opportunities or pain points the sale should address.

    Discovery & Strategy

    Step 2.1

    Establish the M&A Program Plan

    Activities

    • 2.1.1 Create the mission and vision
    • 2.1.2 Identify the guiding principles
    • 2.1.3 Create the future-state operating model
    • 2.1.4 Determine the transition team
    • 2.1.5 Document the M&A governance
    • 2.1.6 Create program metrics

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive/CIO
    • IT senior leadership
    • Company M&A team

    Outcomes of Step

    Establish an M&A program plan that can be repeated across sales/divestitures.

    The vision and mission statements clearly articulate IT’s aspirations and purpose

    The IT vision statement communicates a desired future state of the IT organization, whereas the IT mission statement portrays the organization’s reason for being. While each serves its own purpose, they should both be derived from the business context implications for IT.

    Vision Statements

    Mission Statements

    Characteristics

    • Describe a desired future
    • Focus on ends, not means
    • Concise
    • Aspirational
    • Memorable
    • Articulate a reason for existence
    • Focus on how to achieve the vision
    • Concise
    • Easy to grasp
    • Sharply focused
    • Inspirational

    Samples

    To be a trusted advisor and partner in enabling business innovation and growth through an engaged IT workforce. (Source: Business News Daily) IT is a cohesive, proactive, and disciplined team that delivers innovative technology solutions while demonstrating a strong customer-oriented mindset. (Source: Forbes, 2013)

    2.1.1 Create the mission and vision statements

    2 hours

    Input: Business objectives, IT capabilities, Rationale for the transaction

    Output: IT’s mission and vision statements for reduction strategies tied to mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures

    Materials: Flip charts/whiteboard, Markers, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to create mission and vision statements that reflect IT’s intent and method to support the organization as it pursues a reduction strategy.

    1. Review the definitions and characteristics of mission and vision statements.
    2. Brainstorm different versions of the mission and vision statements.
    3. Edit the statements until you get to a single version of each that accurately reflects IT’s role in the reduction process.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Guiding principles provide a sense of direction

    IT guiding principles are shared, long-lasting beliefs that guide the use of IT in constructing, transforming, and operating the enterprise by informing and restricting IT investment portfolio management, solution development, and procurement decisions.

    A diagram illustrating the place of 'IT guiding principles' in the process of making 'Decisions on the use of IT'. There are four main items, connecting lines naming the type of process in getting from one step to the next, and a line underneath clarifying the questions asked at each step. On the far left, over the question 'What decisions should be made?', is 'Business context and IT implications'. This flows forward to 'IT guiding principles', and they are connected by 'Influence'. Next, over the question 'How should decisions be made?', is the main highlighted section. 'IT guiding principles' flows forward to 'Decisions on the use of IT', and they are connected by 'Guide and inform'. On the far right, over the question 'Who has the accountability and authority to make decisions?', is 'IT policies'. This flows back to 'Decisions on the use of IT', and they are connected by 'Direct and control'.

    IT principles must be carefully constructed to make sure they are adhered to and relevant

    Info-Tech has identified a set of characteristics that IT principles should possess. These characteristics ensure the IT principles are relevant and followed in the organization.

    Approach focused. IT principles should be focused on the approach – how the organization is built, transformed, and operated – as opposed to what needs to be built, which is defined by both functional and non-functional requirements.

    Business relevant. Create IT principles that are specific to the organization. Tie IT principles to the organization’s priorities and strategic aspirations.

    Long lasting. Build IT principles that will withstand the test of time.

    Prescriptive. Inform and direct decision making with actionable IT principles. Avoid truisms, general statements, and observations.

    Verifiable. If compliance can’t be verified, people are less likely to follow the principle.

    Easily Digestible. IT principles must be clearly understood by everyone in IT and by business stakeholders. IT principles aren’t a secret manuscript of the IT team. IT principles should be succinct; wordy principles are hard to understand and remember.

    Followed. Successful IT principles represent a collection of beliefs shared among enterprise stakeholders. IT principles must be continuously communicated to all stakeholders to achieve and maintain buy-in.

    In organizations where formal policy enforcement works well, IT principles should be enforced through appropriate governance processes.

    Consider the example principles below

    IT Principle Name

    IT Principle Statement

    1. Risk Management We will ensure that the organization’s IT Risk Management Register is properly updated to reflect all potential risks and that a plan of action against those risks has been identified.
    2. Transparent Communication We will ensure employees are spoken to with respect and transparency throughout the transaction process.
    3. Separation for Success We will create a carve-out strategy that enables the organization and clearly communicates the resources required to succeed.
    4. Managed Data We will handle data creation, modification, separation, and use across the enterprise in compliance with our data governance policy.
    5.Deliver Better Customer Service We will reduce the number of products offered by IT, enabling a stronger focus on specific products or elements to increase customer service delivery.
    6. Compliance With Laws and Regulations We will operate in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations for both our organization and the potentially purchasing organization.
    7. Defined Value We will create a plan of action that aligns with the organization’s defined value expectations.
    8. Network Readiness We will ensure that employees and customers have immediate access to the network with minimal or no outages.
    9. Value Generator We will leverage the current IT people, processes, and technology to turn the IT organization into a value generator by developing and selling our services to purchasing organizations.

    2.1.2 Identify the guiding principles

    2 hours

    Input: Business objectives, IT capabilities, Rationale for the transaction, Mission and vision statements

    Output: IT’s guiding principles for reduction strategies tied to mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures

    Materials: Flip charts/whiteboard, Markers, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to create the guiding principles that will direct the IT organization throughout the reduction strategy process.

    1. Review the role of guiding principles and the examples of guiding principles that organizations have used.
    2. Brainstorm different versions of the guiding principles. Each guiding principle should start with the phrase “We will…”
    3. Edit and consolidate the statements until you have a list of approximately eight to ten statements that accurately reflect IT’s role in the reduction process.
    4. Review the guiding principles every six months to ensure they continue to support the delivery of the business’ reduction strategy goals.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Create two IT teams to support the transaction

    IT M&A Transaction Team

    • The IT M&A Transaction Team should consist of the strongest members of the IT team who can be expected to deliver on unusual or additional tasks not asked of them in normal day-to-day operations.
    • The roles selected for this team will have very specific skills sets or deliver on critical separation capabilities, making their involvement in the combination of two or more IT environments paramount.
    • These individuals need to have a history of proving themselves very trustworthy, as they will likely be required to sign an NDA as well.
    • Expect to have to certain duplicate capabilities or roles across the M&A Team and Operational Team.

    IT Operational Team

    • This group is responsible for ensuring the business operations continue.
    • These employees might be those who are newer to the organization but can be counted on to deliver consistent IT services and products.
    • The roles of this team should ensure that end users or external customers remain satisfied.

    Key capabilities to support M&A

    Consider the following capabilities when looking at who should be a part of the IT Transaction Team.

    Employees who have a significant role in ensuring that these capabilities are being delivered will be a top priority.

    Infrastructure & Operations

    • System Separation
    • Data Management
    • Helpdesk/Desktop Support
    • Cloud/Server Management

    Business Focus

    • Service-Level Management
    • Enterprise Architecture
    • Stakeholder Management
    • Project Management

    Risk & Security

    • Privacy Management
    • Security Management
    • Risk & Compliance Management

    Build a lasting and scalable operating model

    An operating model is an abstract visualization, used like an architect’s blueprint, that depicts how structures and resources are aligned and integrated to deliver on the organization’s strategy.

    It ensures consistency of all elements in the organizational structure through a clear and coherent blueprint before embarking on detailed organizational design.

    The visual should highlight which capabilities are critical to attaining strategic goals and clearly show the flow of work so that key stakeholders can understand where inputs flow in and outputs flow out of the IT organization.

    As you assess the current operating model, consider the following:

    • Does the operating model contain all the necessary capabilities your IT organization requires to be successful?
    • What capabilities should be duplicated?
    • Are there individuals with the skill set to support those roles? If not, is there a plan to acquire or develop those skills?
    • A dedicated project team strictly focused on M&A is great. However, is it feasible for your organization? If not, what blockers exist?
    A diagram with 'Initiatives' and 'Solutions' on the left and right of an area chart, 'Customer' at the top, the area between them labelled 'Functional Area n', and six horizontal bars labelled 'IT Capability' stacked on top of each other. The 'IT Capability' bars are slightly skewed to the 'Solutions' side of the chart.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Investing time up-front getting the operating model right is critical. This will give you a framework to rationalize future organizational changes, allowing you to be more iterative and allowing your model to change as the business changes.

    2.1.3 Create the future-state operating model

    4 hours

    Input: Current operating model, IT strategy, IT capabilities, M&A-specific IT capabilities, Business objectives, Rationale for the transaction, Mission and vision statements

    Output: Future-state operating model for divesting organizations

    Materials: Operating model, Capability overlay, Flip charts/whiteboard, Markers, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to establish what the future-state operating model will be if your organization needs to adjust to support a divestiture transaction. If your organization plans to sell in its entirety, you may choose to skip this activity.

    1. Ensuring that all the IT capabilities are identified by the business and IT strategy, document your organization’s current operating model.
    2. Identify what core capabilities would be critical to the divesting transaction process and separation. Highlight and make copies of those capabilities in the M&A Sell Playbook. As a result of divesting, there may also be capabilities that will become irrelevant in your future state.
    3. Ensure the capabilities that will be decentralized are clearly identified. Decentralized capabilities do not exist within the central IT organization but rather in specific lines of businesses, products, or locations to better understand needs and deliver on the capability.

    An example operating model is included in the M&A Sell Playbook. This process benefits from strong reference architecture and capability mapping ahead of time.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    2.1.4 Determine the transition team

    3 hours

    Input: IT capabilities, Future-state operating model, M&A-specific IT capabilities, Business objectives, Rationale for the transaction, Mission and vision statements

    Output: Transition team

    Materials: Reference architecture, Organizational structure, Flip charts/whiteboard, Markers

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to create a team that will support your IT organization throughout the transaction. Determining which capabilities and therefore which roles will be required ensures that the business will continue to get the operational support it needs.

    1. Based on the outcome of activity 2.1.3, review the capabilities that your organization will require on the transition team. Group capabilities into functional groups containing capabilities that are aligned well with one another because they have similar responsibilities and functionalities.
    2. Replace the capabilities with roles. For example, stakeholder management, requirements gathering, and project management might be one functional group. Project management and stakeholder management might combine to create a project manager role.
    3. Review the examples in the M&A Sell Playbook and identify which roles will be a part of the transition team.

    For more information, see Redesign Your Organizational Structure

    What is governance?

    And why does it matter so much to IT and the M&A process?

    • Governance is the method in which decisions get made, specifically as they impact various resources (time, money, and people).
    • Because M&A is such a highly governed transaction, it is important to document the governance bodies that exist in your organization.
    • This will give insight into what types of governing bodies there are, what decisions they make, and how that will impact IT.
    • For example, funds to support separation need to be discussed, approved, and supplied to IT from a governing body overseeing the acquisition.
    • A highly mature IT organization will have automated governance, while a seemingly non-existent governance process will be considered ad hoc.
    A pyramid with four levels representing the types of governing bodies that are available with differing levels of IT maturity. An arrow beside the pyramid points upward. The bottom of the arrow is labelled 'Traditional (People and document centric)' and the top is labelled 'Adaptive (Data centric)'. Starting at the bottom of the pyramid is level 1 'Ad Hoc Governance', 'Governance that is not well defined or understood within the organization. It occurs out of necessity but often not by the right people'. Level 2 is 'Controlled Governance', 'Governance focused on compliance and decisions driven by hierarchical authority. Levels of authority are defined and often driven by regulatory'. Level 3 is 'Agile Governance', 'Governance that is flexible to support different needs and quick response in the organization. Driven by principles and delegated throughout the company'. At the top of the pyramid is level 4 'Automated Governance', 'Governance that is entrenched and automated into organizational processes and product/service design. Empowered and fully delegated governance to maintain fit and drive organizational success and survival'.

    2.1.5 Document M&A governance

    1-2 hours

    Input: List of governing bodies, Governing body committee profiles, Governance structure

    Output: Documented method on how decisions are made as it relates to the M&A transaction

    Materials: Flip charts/whiteboard, Markers, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to determine the method in which decisions are made throughout the M&A transaction as it relates to IT. This will require understanding both governing bodies internal to IT and those external to IT.

    1. First, determine the other governance structures within the organization that will impact the decisions made about M&A. List out these bodies or committees.
    2. Create a profile for each committee that looks at the membership, purpose of the committee, decision areas (authority), and the process of inputs and outputs. Ensure IT committees that will have a role in this process are also documented. Consider the benefits realized, risks, and resources required for each.
    3. Organize the committees into a structure, identifying the committees that have a role in defining the strategy, designing and building, and running.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Current-state structure map – definitions of tiers

    Strategy: These groups will focus on decisions that directly connect to the strategic direction of the organization.

    Design & Build: The second tier of groups will oversee prioritization of a certain area of governance as well as design and build decisions that feed into strategic decisions.

    Run: The lowest level of governance will be oversight of more-specific initiatives and capabilities within IT.

    Expect tier overlap. Some committees will operate in areas that cover two or three of these governance tiers.

    Measure the IT program’s success in terms of its ability to support the business’ M&A goals

    Upper management will measure IT’s success based on your ability to support the underlying reasons for the M&A. Using business metrics will help assure business stakeholders that IT understands their needs and is working with the business to achieve them.

    Business-Specific Metrics

    • Revenue Growth: Increase in the top line as seen by market expansion, product expansion, etc. by percentage/time.
    • Synergy Extraction: Reduction in costs as determined by the ability to identify and eliminate redundancies over time.
    • Profit Margin Growth: Increase in the bottom line as a result of increased revenue growth and/or decreased costs over time.

    IT-Specific Metrics

    • IT operational savings and cost reductions due to synergies: Operating expenses, capital expenditures, licenses, contracts, applications, infrastructure over time.
    • Reduction in IT staff expense and headcount: Decreased budget allocated to IT staff, and ability to identify and remove redundancies in staff.
    • Meeting or improving on IT budget estimates: Delivering successful IT separation on a budget that is the same or lower than the budget estimated during due diligence.
    • Meeting or improving on IT time-to-separation estimates: Delivering successful IT carve-out on a timeline that is the same or shorter than the timeline estimated during due diligence.
    • Business capability support: Delivering the end state of IT that supports the expected business capabilities and growth.

    Establish your own metrics to gauge the success of IT

    Establish SMART M&A Success Metrics

    S pecific Make sure the objective is clear and detailed.
    M easurable Objectives are measurable if there are specific metrics assigned to measure success. Metrics should be objective.
    A ctionable Objectives become actionable when specific initiatives designed to achieve the objective are identified.
    R ealistic Objectives must be achievable given your current resources or known available resources.
    T ime-Bound An objective without a timeline can be put off indefinitely. Furthermore, measuring success is challenging without a timeline.
    • What should IT consider when looking to identify potential additions, deletions, or modifications that will either add value to the organization or reduce costs/risks?
    • Provide a definition of synergies.
    • IT operational savings and cost reductions due to synergies: Operating expenses, capital expenditures, licenses, contracts, applications, infrastructure.
    • Reduction in IT staff expense and headcount: Decreased budget allocated to IT staff, and ability to identify and remove redundancies in staff.
    • Meeting or improving on IT budget estimates: Delivering successful IT separation on a budget that is the same or lower than the budget estimated during due diligence.
    • Meeting or improving on IT time-to-separation estimates: Delivering successful IT carve-out on a timeline that is the same or shorter than the timeline estimated during due diligence.
    • Revenue growth: Increase in the top line as a result, as seen by market expansion, product expansion, etc., as a result of divesting lines of the business and selling service-level agreements to the purchasing organization.
    • Synergy extraction: Reduction in costs, as determined by the ability to identify and eliminate redundancies.
    • Profit margin growth: Increase in the bottom line as a result of increased revenue growth and/or decreased costs.

    Metrics for each phase

    1. Proactive

    2. Discovery & Strategy

    3. Valuation & Due Diligence

    4. Execution & Value Realization

    • % Share of business innovation spend from overall IT budget
    • % Critical processes with approved performance goals and metrics
    • % IT initiatives that meet or exceed value expectation defined in business case
    • % IT initiatives aligned with organizational strategic direction
    • % Satisfaction with IT's strategic decision-making abilities
    • $ Estimated business value added through IT-enabled innovation
    • % Overall stakeholder satisfaction with IT
    • % Percent of business leaders that view IT as an Innovator
    • % IT budget as a percent of revenue
    • % Assets that are not allocated
    • % Unallocated software licenses
    • # Obsolete assets
    • % IT spend that can be attributed to the business (chargeback or showback)
    • % Share of CapEx of overall IT budget
    • % Prospective organizations that meet the search criteria
    • $ Total IT cost of ownership (before and after M&A, before and after rationalization)
    • % Business leaders that view IT as a Business Partner
    • % Defects discovered in production
    • $ Cost per user for enterprise applications
    • % In-house-built applications vs. enterprise applications
    • % Owners identified for all data domains
    • # IT staff asked to participate in due diligence
    • Change to due diligence
    • IT budget variance
    • Synergy target
    • % Satisfaction with the effectiveness of IT capabilities
    • % Overall end-customer satisfaction
    • $ Impact of vendor SLA breaches
    • $ Savings through cost-optimization efforts
    • $ Savings through application rationalization and technology standardization
    • # Key positions empty
    • % Frequency of staff turnover
    • % Emergency changes
    • # Hours of unplanned downtime
    • % Releases that cause downtime
    • % Incidents with identified problem record
    • % Problems with identified root cause
    • # Days from problem identification to root cause fix
    • % Projects that consider IT risk
    • % Incidents due to issues not addressed in the security plan
    • # Average vulnerability remediation time
    • % Application budget spent on new build/buy vs. maintenance (deferred feature implementation, enhancements, bug fixes)
    • # Time (days) to value realization
    • % Projects that realized planned benefits
    • $ IT operational savings and cost reductions that are related to synergies/divestitures
    • % IT staff–related expenses/redundancies
    • # Days spent on IT separation
    • $ Accurate IT budget estimates
    • % Revenue growth directly tied to IT delivery
    • % Profit margin growth

    2.1.6 Create program metrics

    1-2 hours

    Input: IT capabilities, Mission, vision, and guiding principles, Rationale for the acquisition

    Output: Program metrics to support IT throughout the M&A process

    Materials: Flip charts/whiteboard, Markers, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to determine how IT’s success throughout a growth transaction will be measured and determined.

    1. Document a list of appropriate metrics on the whiteboard. Remember to include metrics that demonstrate the business impact. You can use the sample metrics listed on the previous slide as a starting point.
    2. Set a target and deadline for each metric. This will help the group determine when it is time to evaluate progression.
    3. Establish a baseline for each metric based on information collected within your organization.
    4. Assign an owner for tracking each metric as well as someone to be accountable for performance.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Discovery & Strategy

    Step 2.2

    Prepare IT to Engage in the Separation or Sale

    Activities

    • 2.2.1 Establish the separation strategy
    • 2.2.2 Conduct a RACI
    • 2.2.3 Create the communication plan
    • 2.2.4 Assess the potential organization(s)

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive/CIO
    • IT senior leadership
    • Company M&A team

    Outcomes of Step

    Identify IT’s plan of action when it comes to the separation/sale and align IT’s separation/sale strategy with the business’ M&A strategy.

    Separation strategies

    There are several IT separation strategies that will let you achieve your target technology environment.

    IT Separation Strategies
    • Divest. Carve out elements of the IT organization and sell them to a purchasing organization with or without a service-level agreement.
    • Sell. Sell the entire IT environment to a purchasing organization. The purchasing organization takes full responsibility in delivering and running the IT environment.
    • Spin-Off Joint Venture. Carve out elements of the IT organization and combine them with elements of a new or purchasing organization to create a new entity.

    The approach IT takes will depend on the business objectives for the M&A.

    • Generally speaking, the separation strategy is well understood and influenced by the frequency of and rationale for selling.
    • Based on the initiatives generated by each business process owner, you need to determine the IT separation strategy that will best support the desired target technology environment, especially if you are still operating or servicing elements of that IT environment.

    Key considerations when choosing an IT separation strategy include:

    • What are the main business objectives of the M&A?
    • What are the key synergies expected from the transaction?
    • What IT separation strategy best helps obtain these benefits?
    • What opportunities exist to position the business for sustainable and long-term growth?

    Separation strategies in detail

    Review highlights and drawbacks of different separation strategies

    Divest
      Highlights
    • Recommended for businesses striving to reduce costs and potentially even generate revenue for the business through the delivery of SLAs.
    • Opportunity to reduce or scale back on lines of business or products that are not driving profits.
      Drawbacks
    • May be forced to give up critical staff that have been known to deliver high value.
    • The IT department is left to deliver services to the purchasing organization with little support or consideration from the business.
    • There can be increased risk and security concerns that need to be addressed.
    Sell
      Highlights
    • Recommended for businesses looking to gain capital to exit the market profitably or to enter a new market with a large sum of capital.
    • The business will no longer exist, and as a result all operational costs, including IT, will become redundant.
      Drawbacks
    • IT is no longer needed as an operating or capital service for the organization.
    • Lost resources, including highly trained and critical staff.
    • May require packaging employees off and using the profit or capital generated to cover any closing costs.
    Spin-Off or Joint Venture
      Highlights
    • Recommended for businesses looking to expand their market presence or acquire new products. Essentially aligning the two organizations in the same market.
    • Each side has a unique offering but complementing capabilities.
      Drawbacks
    • As much as the organization is going through a separation from the original company, it will be going through an integration with the new company.
    • There could be differences in culture.
    • This could require a large amount of investment without a guarantee of profit or success.

    2.2.1 Establish the separation strategy

    1-2 hours

    Input: Business separation strategy, Guiding principles, M&A governance

    Output: IT’s separation strategy

    Materials: Flip charts/whiteboard, Markers, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to determine IT’s approach to separating or selling. This approach might differ slightly from transaction to transaction. However, the businesses approach to transactions should give insight into the general separation strategy IT should adopt.

    1. Make sure you have clearly articulated the business objectives for the M&A, the technology end state for IT, and the magnitude of the overall separation.
    2. Review and discuss the highlights and drawbacks of each type of separation.
    3. Use Info-Tech’s Separation Posture Selection Framework on the next slide to select the separation posture that will appropriately enable the business. Consider these questions during your discussion:
      1. What are the main business objectives of the M&A? What key IT capabilities will need to support business objectives?
      2. What key synergies are expected from the transaction? What opportunities exist to position the business for sustainable growth?
      3. What IT separation best helps obtain these benefits?

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Separation Posture Selection Framework

    Business M&A Strategy

    Resultant Technology Strategy

    M&A Magnitude (% of Seller Assets, Income, or Market Value)

    IT Separation Posture

    A. Horizontal Adopt One Model ‹100% Divest
    ›99% Sell
    B. Vertical Create Links Between Critical Systems Any Divest
    C. Conglomerate Independent Model Any Joint Venture
    Divest
    D. Hybrid: Horizontal & Conglomerate Create Links Between Critical Systems Any Divest
    Joint Venture

    M&A separation strategy

    Business M&A Strategy Resultant Technology Strategy M&A Magnitude (% of Seller Assets, Income, or Market Value) IT Separation Posture

    You may need a hybrid separation posture to achieve the technology end state.

    M&A objectives may not affect all IT domains and business functions in the same way. Therefore, the separation requirements for each business function may differ. Organizations will often choose to select and implement a hybrid separation posture to realize the technology end state.

    Each business division may have specific IT domain and capability needs that require an alternative separation strategy.

    • Example: Even when conducting a joint venture by forming a new organization, some partners might view themselves as the dominant partner and want to influence the IT environment to a greater degree.
    • Example: Some purchasing organizations will expect service-level agreements to be available for a significant period of time following the divestiture, while others will be immediately independent.

    2.2.2 Conduct a RACI

    1-2 hours

    Input: IT capabilities, Transition team, Separation strategy

    Output: Completed RACI for Transition team

    Materials: Reference architecture, Organizational structure, Flip charts/whiteboard, Markers, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to identify the core accountabilities and responsibilities for the roles identified as critical to your transition team. While there might be slight variation from transaction to transaction, ideally each role should be performing certain tasks.

    1. First, identify a list of critical tasks that need to be completed to support the sale or separation. For example:
      • Communicate with the company M&A team.
      • Identify the key IT solutions that can and cannot be carved out.
      • Gather data room artifacts and provide them to acquiring organization.
    2. Next, identify at the activity level which role is accountable or responsible for each activity. Enter an A for accountable, R for responsible, or A/R for both.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Communication and change

    Prepare key stakeholders for the potential changes

    • Anytime you are starting a project or program that will depend on users and stakeholders to give up their old way of doing things, change will force people to become novices again, leading to lost productivity and added stress.
    • Change management can improve outcomes for any project where you need people to adopt new tools and procedures, comply with new policies, learn new skills and behaviors, or understand and support new processes.
    • M&As move very quickly, and it can be very difficult to keep track of which stakeholders you need to be communicating with and what you should be communicating.
    • Not all organizations embrace or resist change in the same ways. Base your change communications on your organization’s cultural appetite for change in general.
      • Organizations with a low appetite for change will require more direct, assertive communications.
      • Organizations with a high appetite for change are more suited to more open, participatory approaches.

    Three key dimensions determine the appetite for cultural change:

    • Power Distance. Refers to the acceptance that power is distributed unequally throughout the organization.
      In organizations with a high power distance, the unequal power distribution is accepted by the less powerful employees.
    • Individualism. Organizations that score high in individualism have employees who are more independent. Those who score low in individualism fall into the collectivism side, where employees are strongly tied to one another or their groups.
    • Uncertainty Avoidance. Describes the level of acceptance that an organization has toward uncertainty. Those who score high in this area find that their employees do not favor uncertain situations, while those that score low in this area find that their employees are comfortable with change and uncertainty.

    2.2.3 Create the communication plan

    1-2 hours

    Input: IT’s M&A mission, vision, and guiding principles, M&A transition team, IT separation strategy, RACI

    Output: IT’s M&A communication plan

    Materials: Flip charts/whiteboard, Markers, RACI, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to create a communication plan that IT can leverage throughout the initiative.

    1. Create a structured communication plan that allows for continuous communication with the integration management office, senior management, and the business functional heads.
    2. Outline key topics of communication, with stakeholders, inputs, and outputs for each topic.
    3. Review Info-Tech’s example communication plan in the M&A Sell Playbook and update it with relevant information.
    4. Does this communication plan make sense for your organization? What doesn’t make sense? Adjust the communication guide to suit your organization.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Assessing potential organizations

    As soon as you have identified organizations to consider, it’s imperative to assess critical risks. Most IT leaders can attest that they will receive little to no notice when the business is pursuing a sale and IT has to assess the IT organization. As a result, having a standardized template to quickly assess the potential acquiring organization is important.

    Ways to Assess

    1. News: Assess what sort of news has been announced in relation to the organization. Have they had any risk incidents? Has a critical vendor announced working with them?
    2. LinkedIn: Scan through the LinkedIn profiles of employees. This will give you a sense of what platforms they have based on employees. It will also give insight into positive or negative employee experiences that could impact retention.
    3. Trends: Some industries will have specific solutions that are relevant and popular. Assess what the key players are (if you don’t already know) to determine the solution.
    4. Business Architecture: While this assessment won’t perfect, try to understand the business’ value streams and the critical business and IT capabilities that would be needed to support them. Will your organization or employee skills be required to support these long term?

    Info-Tech Insight

    Assessing potential organizations is not just for the purchaser. The seller should also know what the purchasing organization’s history with M&As is and what potential risks could occur if remaining connected through ongoing SLAs.

    2.2.4 Assess the potential organization(s)

    1-2 hours

    Input: Publicized historical risk events, Solutions and vendor contracts likely in the works, Trends

    Output: IT’s valuation of the potential organization(s) for selling or divesting

    Materials: M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO

    The purpose of this activity is to assess the organization(s) that your organization is considering selling or divesting to.

    1. Complete the Historical Valuation Worksheet in the M&A Sell Playbook to understand the type of IT organization that your company may support.
      • The business likely isn’t looking for in-depth details at this time. However, as the IT leader, it is your responsibility to ensure critical risks are identified and communicated to the business.
    2. Use the information identified to help the business narrow down which organizations could be the right organizations to sell or divest to.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    By the end of this pre-transaction phase you should:

    Have a program plan for M&As and a repeatable M&A strategy for IT when engaging in reduction transactions

    Key outcomes from the Discovery & Strategy phase
    • Prepare the IT environment to support the potential sale or divestiture by identifying critical program plan elements and establishing a separation or carve-out strategy that will enable the business to reach its goals.
    • Create a M&A strategy that accounts for all the necessary elements of a transaction and ensures sufficient governance, capabilities, and metrics exist.
    Key deliverables from the Discovery & Strategy phase
    • Create vision and mission statements
    • Establish guiding principles
    • Create a future-state operating model
    • Identify the key roles for the transaction team
    • Identify and communicate the M&A governance
    • Determine target metrics
    • Identify the M&A operating model
    • Select the separation strategy framework
    • Conduct a RACI for key transaction tasks for the transaction team
    • Document the communication plan

    M&A Sell Blueprint

    Phase 3

    Due Diligence & Preparation

    Phase 1Phase 2

    Phase 3

    Phase 4
    • 1.1 Identify Stakeholders and Their Perspective of IT
    • 1.2 Assess IT’s Current Value and Future State
    • 1.3 Drive Innovation and Suggest Reduction Opportunities
    • 2.1 Establish the M&A Program Plan
    • 2.2 Prepare IT to Engage in the Separation or Sale
    • 3.1 Engage in Due Diligence and Prepare Staff
    • 3.2 Prepare to Separate
    • 4.1 Execute the Transaction
    • 4.2 Reflection and Value Realization

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Drive value with a due diligence charter
    • Gather data room artifacts
    • Measure staff engagement
    • Assess culture
    • Create a carve-out roadmap
    • Prioritize separation tasks
    • Establish the separation roadmap
    • Identify the buyer’s IT expectations
    • Create a service/transaction agreement
    • Estimate separation costs
    • Create an employee transition plan
    • Create functional workplans for employees
    • Align project metrics with identified tasks

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • IT executive/CIO
    • IT senior leadership
    • Company M&A team
    • Business leaders
    • Purchasing organization
    • Transition team

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Pre-Work

    Day 1

    Day 2

    Day 3

    Day 4

    Day 5

    Establish the Transaction FoundationDiscover the Motivation for SeparationIdentify Expectations and Create the Carve-Out RoadmapPrepare and Manage EmployeesPlan the Separation RoadmapNext Steps and Wrap-Up (offsite)

    Activities

    • 0.1 Identify the rationale for the company's decision to pursue a divestiture/sale.
    • 0.2 Identify key stakeholders and determine the IT transaction team.
    • 0.3 Gather and evaluate the M&A strategy, future-state operating model, and governance.
    • 1.1 Review the business rationale for the divestiture/sale.
    • 1.2 Identify pain points and opportunities tied to the divestiture/sale.
    • 1.3 Establish the separation strategy.
    • 1.4 Create the due diligence charter.
    • 2.1 Identify the buyer’s IT expectations.
    • 2.2 Create a list of IT artifacts to be reviewed in the data room.
    • 2.3 Create a carve-out roadmap.
    • 2.4 Create a service/technical transaction agreement.
    • 3.1 Measure staff engagement.
    • 3.2 Assess the current culture and identify the goal culture.
    • 3.3 Create an employee transition plan.
    • 3.4 Create functional workplans for employees.
    • 4.1 Prioritize separation tasks.
    • 4.2 Establish the separation roadmap.
    • 4.3 Establish and align project metrics with identified tasks.
    • 4.4 Estimate separation costs.
    • 5.1 Complete in-progress deliverables from previous four days.
    • 5.2 Set up review time for workshop deliverables and to discuss next steps.

    Deliverables

    1. IT strategy
    2. IT operating model
    3. IT governance structure
    4. M&A transaction team
    1. Business context implications for IT
    2. Separation strategy
    3. Due diligence charter
    1. Data room artifacts identified
    2. Carve-out roadmap
    3. Service/technical transaction agreement
    1. Engagement assessment
    2. Culture assessment
    3. Employee transition plans and workplans
    1. Separation roadmap and associated resourcing
    1. Divestiture separation strategy for IT

    What is the Due Diligence & Preparation phase?

    Mid-transaction state

    The Due Diligence & Preparation phase during a sale or divestiture is a critical time for IT. If IT fails to proactively participate in this phase, IT will have to merely react to separation expectations set by the business.

    If your organization is being sold in its entirety, staff will have major concerns about their future in the new organization. Making this transition as smooth as possible and being transparent could go a long way in ensuring their success in the new organization.

    In a divestiture, this is the time to determine where it’s possible for the organization to divide or separate from itself. A lack of IT involvement in these conversations could lead to an overcommitment by the business and under-delivery by IT.

    Goal: To ensure that, as the selling or divesting organization, you comply with regulations, prepare staff for potential changes, and identify a separation strategy if necessary

    Due Diligence Prerequisite Checklist

    Before coming into the Due Diligence & Preparation phase, you must have addressed the following:

    • Understand the rationale for the company's decision to pursue a sale or divestiture and what opportunities or pain points the sale should alleviate.
    • Identify the key roles for the transaction team.
    • Identify the M&A governance.
    • Determine target metrics.
    • Select a separation strategy framework.
    • Conduct a RACI for key transaction tasks for the transaction team.

    Before coming into the Due Diligence & Preparation phase, we recommend addressing the following:

    • Create vision and mission statements.
    • Establish guiding principles.
    • Create a future-state operating model.
    • Identify the M&A operating model.
    • Document the communication plan.
    • Examine the business perspective of IT.
    • Identify key stakeholders and outline their relationship to the M&A process.
    • Be able to valuate the IT environment and communicate IT’s value to the business.

    The Technology Value Trinity

    Delivery of Business Value & Strategic Needs

    • Digital & Technology Strategy
      The identification of objectives and initiatives necessary to achieve business goals.
    • IT Operating Model
      The model for how IT is organized to deliver on business needs and strategies.
    • Information & Technology Governance
      The governance to ensure the organization and its customers get maximum value from the use of information and technology.

    All three elements of the Technology Value Trinity work in harmony to deliver business value and achieve strategic needs. As one changes, the others need to change as well.

    • Digital and IT Strategy tells you what you need to achieve to be successful.
    • IT Operating Model and Organizational Design is the alignment of resources to deliver on your strategy and priorities.
    • Information & Technology Governance is the confirmation of IT’s goals and strategy, which ensures the alignment of IT and business strategy. It’s the mechanism by which you continuously prioritize work to ensure that what is delivered is in line with the strategy. This oversight evaluates, directs, and monitors the delivery of outcomes to ensure that the use of resources results in the achieving the organization’s goals.

    Too often strategy, operating model and organizational design, and governance are considered separate practices. As a result, “strategic documents” end up being wish lists, and projects continue to be prioritized based on who shouts the loudest – not based on what is in the best interest of the organization.

    Due Diligence & Preparation

    Step 3.1

    Engage in Due Diligence and Prepare Staff

    Activities

    • 3.1.1 Drive value with a due diligence charter
    • 3.1.2 Gather data room artifacts
    • 3.1.3 Measure staff engagement
    • 3.1.4 Assess culture

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive/CIO
    • IT senior leadership
    • Company M&A team
    • Business leaders
    • Prospective IT organization
    • Transition team

    Outcomes of Step

    This step of the process is when IT should prepare and support the business in due diligence and gather the necessary information about staff changes.

    3.1.1 Drive value with a due diligence charter

    1-2 hours

    Input: Key roles for the transaction team, M&A governance, Target metrics, Selected separation strategy framework, RACI of key transaction tasks for the transaction team

    Output: IT Due Diligence Charter

    Materials: M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to create a charter leveraging the items completed in the previous phase, as listed on the Due Diligence Prerequisite Checklist slide, to gain executive sign-off.

    1. In the IT Due Diligence Charter in the M&A Sell Playbook, complete the aspects of the charter that are relevant for you and your organization.
    2. We recommend including these items in the charter:
      • Communication plan
      • Transition team roles
      • Goals and metrics for the transaction
      • Separation strategy
      • Sale/divestiture RACI
    3. Once the charter has been completed, ensure that business executives agree to the charter and sign off on the plan of action.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    3.1.2 Gather data room artifacts

    4 hours

    Input: Future-state operating model, M&A governance, Target metrics, Selected separation strategy framework, RACI of key transaction tasks for the transaction team

    Output: List of items to acquire and verify can be provided to the purchasing organization while in the data room

    Materials: Critical domain lists on following slides, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team, Transition team, Legal team, Compliance/privacy officers

    The purpose of this activity is to create a list of the key artifacts that you could be asked for during the due diligence process.

    1. Review the lists on the following pages as a starting point. Identify which domains, stakeholders, artifacts, and information should be requested for the data room.
    2. IT leadership may or may not be asked to enter the data room directly. The short notice for having to find these artifacts for the purchasing organization can leave your IT organization scrambling. Identify the critical items worth obtaining ahead of time.
    3. Once you have identified the artifacts, provide the list to the legal team or compliance/privacy officers and ensure they also agree those items can be provided. If changes to the documents need to be made, take the time to do so.
    4. Store all items in a safe and secure file or provide to the M&A team ahead of due diligence.

    **Note that if your organization is not leading/initiating the data room, then you can ignore this activity.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Critical domains

    Understand the key stakeholders and outputs for each domain

    Domain

    Stakeholders

    Key Artifacts

    Key Information to request

    Business
    • Enterprise Architecture
    • Business Relationship Manager
    • Business Process Owners
    • Business capability map
    • Capability map (the M&A team should be taking care of this, but make sure it exists)
    • Business satisfaction with various IT systems and services
    Leadership/IT Executive
    • CIO
    • CTO
    • CISO
    • IT budgets
    • IT capital and operating budgets (from current year and previous year)
    Data & Analytics
    • Chief Data Officer
    • Data Architect
    • Enterprise Architect
    • Master data domains, system of record for each
    • Unstructured data retention requirements
    • Data architecture
    • Master data domains, sources, and storage
    • Data retention requirements
    Applications
    • Applications Manager
    • Application Portfolio Manager
    • Application Architect
    • Applications map
    • Applications inventory
    • Applications architecture
    • Copy of all software license agreements
    • Copy of all software maintenance agreements
    Infrastructure
    • Head of Infrastructure
    • Enterprise Architect
    • Infrastructure Architect
    • Infrastructure Manager
    • Infrastructure map
    • Infrastructure inventory
    • Network architecture (including which data centers host which infrastructure and applications)
    • Inventory (including separation capabilities of vendors, versions, switches, and routers)
    • Copy of all hardware lease or purchase agreements
    • Copy of all hardware maintenance agreements
    • Copy of all outsourcing/external service provider agreements
    • Copy of all service-level agreements for centrally provided, shared services and systems
    Products and Services
    • Product Manager
    • Head of Customer Interactions
    • Product lifecycle
    • Product inventory
    • Customer market strategy

    Critical domains (continued)

    Understand the key stakeholders and outputs for each domain

    Domain

    Stakeholders

    Key Artifacts

    Key Information to request

    Operations
    • Head of Operations
    • Service catalog
    • Service overview
    • Service owners
    • Access policies and procedures
    • Availability and service levels
    • Support policies and procedures
    • Costs and approvals (internal and customer costs)
    IT Processes
    • CIO
    • IT Management
    • VP of IT Governance
    • VP of IT Strategy
    • IT process flow diagram
    • Processes in place and productivity levels (capacity)
    • Critical processes/processes the organization feels they do particularly well
    IT People
    • CIO
    • VP of Human Resources
    • IT organizational chart
    • Competency & capacity assessment
    • IT organizational structure (including resources from external service providers such as contractors) with appropriate job descriptions or roles and responsibilities
    • IT headcount and location
    Security
    • CISO
    • Security Architect
    • Security posture
    • Information security staff
    • Information security service providers
    • Information security tools
    • In-flight information security projects
    Projects
    • Head of Projects
    • Project portfolio
    • List of all future, ongoing, and recently completed projects
    Vendors
    • Head of Vendor Management
    • License inventory
    • Inventory (including what will and will not be transitioning, vendors, versions, number of licenses)

    Retain top talent throughout the transition

    Focus on retention and engagement

    • People are such a critical component of this process, especially in the selling organization.
    • Retaining employees, especially the critical employees who hold specific skills or knowledge, will ensure the success and longevity of the divesting organization, purchasing organization, or the new company.
    • Giving employees a role in the organization and ensuring they do not see their capabilities as redundant will be critical to the process.
    • It is okay if employees need to change what they were doing temporarily or even long-term. However, being transparent about these changes and highlighting their value to the process and organization(s) will help.
    • The first step to moving forward with retention is to look at the baseline engagement and culture of employees and the organization. This will help determine where to focus and allow you to identify changes in engagement that resulted from the transaction.
    • Job engagement drivers are levers that influence the engagement of employees in their day-to-day roles.
    • Organizational engagement drivers are levers that influence an employee’s engagement with the broader organization.
    • Retention drivers are employment needs. They don’t necessarily drive engagement, but they must be met for engagement to be possible.

    3.1.3 Measure staff engagement

    3-4 hours

    Input: Engagement survey

    Output: Baseline engagement scores

    Materials: Build an IT Employee Engagement Program

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, IT employees of current organization

    The purpose of this activity is to measure current staff engagement to have a baseline to measure against in the future state. This is a good activity to complete if you will be divesting or selling in entirety.

    The results from the survey should act as a baseline to determine what the organization is doing well in terms of employee engagement and what drivers could be improved upon.

    1. Review Info-Tech’s Build an IT Employee Engagement Program research and select a survey that will best meet your needs.
    2. Conduct the survey and note which drivers employees are currently satisfied with. Likewise, note where there are opportunities.
    3. Document actions that should be taken to mitigate the negative engagement drivers throughout the transaction and enhance or maintain the positive engagement drivers.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Assess culture as a part of engagement

    Culture should not be overlooked, especially as it relates to the separation of IT environments

    • There are three types of culture that need to be considered.
    • Most importantly, this transition is an opportunity to change the culture that might exist in your organization’s IT environment.
    • Make a decision on which type of culture you’d like IT to have post transition.

    Target Organization's Culture. The culture that the target organization is currently embracing. Their established and undefined governance practices will lend insight into this.

    Your Organization’s Culture. The culture that your organization is currently embracing. Examine people’s attitudes and behaviors within IT toward their jobs and the organization.

    Ideal Culture. What will the future culture of the IT organization be once separation is complete? Are there aspects that your current organization and the target organization embrace that are worth considering?

    Culture categories

    Map the results of the IT Culture Diagnostic to an existing framework

    Competitive
    • Autonomy
    • Confront conflict directly
    • Decisive
    • Competitive
    • Achievement oriented
    • Results oriented
    • High performance expectations
    • Aggressive
    • High pay for good performance
    • Working long hours
    • Having a good reputation
    • Being distinctive/different
    Innovative
    • Adaptable
    • Innovative
    • Quick to take advantage of opportunities
    • Risk taking
    • Opportunities for professional growth
    • Not constrained by rules
    • Tolerant
    • Informal
    • Enthusiastic
    Traditional
    • Stability
    • Reflective
    • Rule oriented
    • Analytical
    • High attention to detail
    • Organized
    • Clear guiding philosophy
    • Security of employment
    • Emphasis on quality
    • Focus on safety
    Cooperative
    • Team oriented
    • Fair
    • Praise for good performance
    • Supportive
    • Calm
    • Developing friends at work
    • Socially responsible

    Culture Considerations

    • What culture category was dominant for each IT organization?
    • Do you share the same dominant category?
    • Is your current dominant culture category the most ideal to have post-separation?

    3.1.4 Assess Culture

    3-4 hours

    Input: Cultural assessments for current IT organization, Cultural assessment for target IT organization

    Output: Goal for IT culture

    Materials: IT Culture Diagnostic

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, IT employees of current organization, IT employees of target organization, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to assess the different cultures that might exist within the IT environments of the organizations involved. By understanding the culture that exists in the purchasing organization, you can identify the fit and prepare impacted staff for potential changes.

    1. Complete this activity by leveraging the blueprint Fix Your IT Culture, specifically the IT Culture Diagnostic.
    2. Fill out the diagnostic for the IT department in your organization:
      1. Answer the 16 questions in tab 2, Diagnostic.
      2. Find out your dominant culture and review recommendations in tab 3, Results.
    3. Document the results from tab 3, Results, in the M&A Sell Playbook if you are trying to record all artifacts related to the transaction in one place.
    4. Repeat the activity for the purchasing organization.
    5. Leverage the information to determine what the goal for the culture of IT will be post-separation if it will differ from the current culture.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Due Diligence & Preparation

    Step 3.2

    Prepare to Separate

    Activities

    • 3.2.1 Create a carve-out roadmap
    • 3.2.2 Prioritize separation tasks
    • 3.2.3 Establish the separation roadmap
    • 3.2.4 Identify the buyer’s IT expectations
    • 3.2.5 Create a service/transaction agreement
    • 3.2.6 Estimate separation costs
    • 3.2.7 Create an employee transition plan
    • 3.2.8 Create functional workplans for employees
    • 3.2.9 Align project metrics with identified tasks

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive/CIO
    • IT senior leadership
    • Transition team
    • Company M&A team
    • Purchasing organization

    Outcomes of Step

    Have an established plan of action toward separation across all domains and a strategy toward resources.

    Don’t underestimate the importance of separation preparation

    Separation involves taking the IT organization and dividing it into two or more separate entities.

    Testing the carve capabilities of the IT organization often takes 3 months. (Source: Cognizant, 2014)

    Daimler-Benz lost nearly $19 billion following its purchase of Chrysler by failing to recognize the cultural differences that existed between the two car companies. (Source: Deal Room)

    Info-Tech Insight

    Separating the IT organization requires more time and effort than business leaders will know. Frequently communicate challenges and lost opportunities when carving the IT environment out.

    Separation needs

    Identify the business objectives of the sale to determine the IT strategy

    Set up a meeting with your IT due diligence team to:

    • Ensure there will be no gaps in the delivery of products and services in the future state.
    • Discuss the people and processes necessary to achieve the target technology environment and support M&A business objectives.

    Use this opportunity to:

    • Identify data and application complexities between the involved organizations.
    • Identify the IT people and process gaps, initiatives, and levels of support expected.
    • Determine your infrastructure needs to ensure effectiveness and delivery of services:
      • Does IT have the infrastructure to support the applications and business capabilities?
      • Identify any gaps between the current infrastructure in both organizations and the infrastructure required.
      • Identify any redundancies/gaps.
      • Determine the appropriate IT separation strategies.
    • Document your gaps, redundancies, initiatives, and assumptions to help you track and justify the initiatives that must be undertaken and help estimate the cost of separation.

    Separation strategies

    There are several IT separation strategies that will let you achieve your target technology environment.

    IT Separation Strategies
    • Divest. Carve out elements of the IT organization and sell them to a purchasing organization with or without a service-level agreement.
    • Sell. Sell the entire IT environment to a purchasing organization. The purchasing organization takes full responsibility in delivering and running the IT environment.
    • Spin-Off Joint Venture. Carve out elements of the IT organization and combine them with elements of a new or purchasing organization to create a new entity.

    The approach IT takes will depend on the business objectives for the M&A.

    • Generally speaking, the separation strategy is well understood and influenced by the frequency of and rationale for selling.
    • Based on the initiatives generated by each business process owner, you need to determine the IT separation strategy that will best support the desired target technology environment, especially if you are still operating or servicing elements of that IT environment.

    Key considerations when choosing an IT separation strategy include:

    • What are the main business objectives of the M&A?
    • What are the key synergies expected from the transaction?
    • What IT separation strategy best helps obtain these benefits?
    • What opportunities exist to position the business for sustainable and long-term growth?

    Separation strategies in detail

    Review highlights and drawbacks of different separation strategies

    Divest
      Highlights
    • Recommended for businesses striving to reduce costs and potentially even generate revenue for the business through the delivery of SLAs.
    • Opportunity to reduce or scale back on lines of business or products that are not driving profits.
      Drawbacks
    • May be forced to give up critical staff that have been known to deliver high value.
    • The IT department is left to deliver services to the purchasing organization with little support or consideration from the business.
    • There can be increased risk and security concerns that need to be addressed.
    Sell
      Highlights
    • Recommended for businesses looking to gain capital to exit the market profitably or to enter a new market with a large sum of capital.
    • The business will no longer exist, and as a result all operational costs, including IT, will become redundant.
      Drawbacks
    • IT is no longer needed as an operating or capital service for the organization.
    • Lost resources, including highly trained and critical staff.
    • May require packaging employees off and using the profit or capital generated to cover any closing costs.
    Spin-Off or Joint Venture
      Highlights
    • Recommended for businesses looking to expand their market presence or acquire new products. Essentially aligning the two organizations in the same market.
    • Each side has a unique offering but complementing capabilities.
      Drawbacks
    • As much as the organization is going through a separation from the original company, it will be going through an integration with the new company.
    • There could be differences in culture.
    • This could require a large amount of investment without a guarantee of profit or success.

    Preparing the carve-out roadmap

    And why it matters so much

    • When carving out the IT environment in preparation for a divestiture, it’s important to understand the infrastructure, application, and data connections that might exist.
    • Much to the business’ surprise, carving out the IT environment is not easy, especially when considering the services and products that might depend on access to certain applications or data sets.
    • Once the business has indicated which elements they anticipate divesting, be prepared for testing the functionality and ability of this carve-out, either through automation or manually. There are benefits and drawbacks to both methods:
      • Automated requires a solution and a developer to code the tests.
      • Manual requires time to find the errors, possibly more time than automated testing.
    • Identify if there are dependencies that will make the carve-out difficult.
      • For example, the business is trying to divest Product X, but that product is integrated with Product Y, which is not being sold.
      • Consider all the processes and products that specific data might support as well.
      • Moreover, the data migration tool will need to enter the ERP system and identify not just the data but all supporting and historical elements that underlie the data.

    Critical components to consider:

    • Selecting manual or automated testing
    • Determining data dependencies
    • Data migration capabilities
    • Auditing approval
    • People and skills that support specific elements being carved out

    3.2.1 Create a carve-out roadmap

    6 hours

    Input: Items included in the carve-out, Dependencies, Whether testing is completed, If the carve-out will pass audit, If the carve-out item is prepared to be separated

    Output: Carve-out roadmap

    Materials: Business’ divestiture plan, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Business leaders, Transition team

    The purpose of this activity is to prepare the IT environment by identifying a carve-out roadmap, specifically looking at data, infrastructure, and applications. Feel free to expand the roadmap to include other categories as your organization sees fit.

    1. In the Carve-Out Roadmap in the M&A Sell Playbook, identify the key elements of the carve-out in the first column.
    2. Note any dependencies the items might have. For example:
      • The business is selling Product X, which is linked to Data X and Data Y. The organization does not want to sell Data Y. Data X would be considered dependent on Data Y.
    3. Once the dependencies have been confirmed, begin automated or manual testing to examine the possibility of separating the data sets (or other dependencies) from one another.
    4. After identifying an acceptable method of separation, inform the auditing individual or body and confirm that there would be no repercussions for the planned process.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    3.2.2 Prioritize separation tasks

    2 hours

    Input: Separation tasks, Transition team, M&A RACI

    Output: Prioritized separation list

    Materials: Separation task checklist, Separation roadmap

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to prioritize the different separation tasks that your organization has identified as necessary to this transaction. Some tasks might not be relevant for this particular transaction, and others might be critical.

    1. Begin by downloading the SharePoint or Excel version of the M&A Separation Project Management Tool.
    2. Identify which separation tasks you want to have as part of your project plan. Alter or remove any tasks that are irrelevant to your organization. Add in tasks you think are missing.
    3. When deciding criticality of the task, consider the effect on stakeholders, those who are impacted or influenced in the process of the task, and dependencies (e.g. data strategy needs to be addressed first before you can tackle its dependencies, like data quality).
    4. Feel free to edit the way you measure criticality. The standard tool leverages a three-point scale. At the end, you should have a list of tasks in priority order based on criticality.

    Record the updates in the M&A Separation Project Management Tool (SharePoint).

    Record the updates in the M&A Separation Project Management Tool (Excel).

    Separation checklists

    Prerequisite Checklist
    • Build the project plan for separation and prioritize activities
      • Plan first day
      • Plan first 30/100 days
      • Plan first year
    • Create an organization-aligned IT strategy
    • Identify critical stakeholders
    • Create a communication strategy
    • Understand the rationale for the sale or divestiture
    • Develop IT's sale/divestiture strategy
      • Determine goal opportunities
      • Create the mission and vision statements
      • Create the guiding principles
      • Create program metrics
    • Consolidate reports from due diligence/data room
    • Conduct culture assessment
    • Create a transaction team
    • Establish a service/technical transaction agreement
    • Plan and communicate culture changes
    • Create an employee transition plan
    • Assess baseline engagement
    Business
    • Design an enterprise architecture
    • Document your business architecture
    • Meet compliance and regulatory standards
    • Identify and assess all of IT's risks
    Applications
    • Prioritize and address critical applications
      • CRM
      • HRIS
      • Financial
      • Sales
      • Risk
      • Security
      • ERP
      • Email
    • Develop method of separating applications
    • Model critical applications that have dependencies on one another
    • Identify the infrastructure capacity required to support critical applications
    • Prioritize and address critical applications
    Leadership/IT Executive
    • Build an IT budget
    • Structure operating budget
    • Structure capital budget
    • Identify the workforce demand vs. capacity
    • Establish and monitor key metrics
    • Communicate value realized/cost savings
    Data
    • Confirm data strategy
    • Confirm data governance
    • Build a data architecture roadmap
    • Analyze data sources and domains
    • Evaluate data storage (on-premises vs. cloud)
    • Develop an enterprise content management strategy and roadmap
    • Ensure cleanliness/usability of data sets
    • Identify data sets that can remain operational if reduced/separated
    • Develop reporting and analytics capabilities
    • Confirm data strategy
    Operations
    • Manage sales access to customer data
    • Determine locations and hours of operation
    • Separate/terminate phone lists and extensions
    • Split email address books
    • Communicate helpdesk/service desk information

    Separation checklists (continued)

    Infrastructure
    • Manage organization domains
    • Consolidate data centers
    • Compile inventory of vendors, versions, switches, and routers
    • Review hardware lease or purchase agreements
    • Review outsourcing/service provider agreements
    • Review service-level agreements
    • Assess connectivity linkages between locations
    • Plan to migrate to a single email system if necessary
    • Determine network access concerns
    Vendors
    • Establish a sustainable vendor management office
    • Review vendor landscape
    • Identify warranty options
    • Identify the licensing grant
    • Rationalize vendor services and solutions
    People
    • Design an IT operating model
    • Design your future IT organizational structure
    • Conduct a RACI for prioritized activities
    • Conduct a culture assessment and identify goal IT culture
    • Build an IT employee engagement program
    • Determine critical roles and systems/process/products they support
    • Define new job descriptions with meaningful roles and responsibilities
    • Create employee transition plans
    • Create functional workplans
    Projects
    • Identify projects to be on hold
    • Communicate project intake process
    • Reprioritize projects
    Products & Services
    • Redefine service catalog
    • Ensure customer interaction requirements are met
    • Select a solution for product lifecycle management
    • Plan service-level agreements
    Security
    • Conduct a security assessment
    • Develop accessibility prioritization and schedule
    • Establish an information security strategy
    • Develop a security awareness and training program
    • Develop and manage security governance, risk, and compliance
    • Identify security budget
    • Build a data privacy and classification program
    IT Processes
    • Evaluate current process models
    • Determine productivity/capacity levels of processes
    • Identify processes to be changed/terminated
    • Establish a communication plan
    • Develop a change management process
    • Establish/review IT policies
    • Evaluate current process models

    3.2.2 Establish the separation roadmap

    2 hours

    Input: Prioritized separation tasks, Carve-out roadmap, Employee transition plan, Separation RACI, Costs for activities, Activity owners

    Output: Separation roadmap

    Materials: M&A Separation Project Plan Tool (SharePoint), M&A Separation Project Plan Tool (Excel), SharePoint Template: Step-by-Step Deployment Guide

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Transition team, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to create a roadmap to support IT throughout the separation process. Using the information gathered in previous activities, you can create a roadmap that will ensure a smooth separation.

    1. Use our Separation Project Management Tool to help track critical elements in relation to the separation project. There are a few options available:
      1. Follow the instructions on the next slide if you are looking to upload our SharePoint project template. Additional instructions are available in the SharePoint Template Step-by-Step Deployment Guide.
      2. If you cannot or do not want to use SharePoint as your project management solution, download our Excel version of the tool.
        **Remember that this your tool, so customize to your liking.
    2. Identify who will own or be accountable for each of the separation tasks and establish the time frame for when each project should begin and end. This will confirm which tasks should be prioritized.

    Record the updates in the M&A Separation Project Management Tool (SharePoint).

    Record the updates in the M&A Separation Project Management Tool (Excel).

    Separation Project Management Tool (SharePoint Template)

    Follow these instructions to upload our template to your SharePoint environment

    1. Create or use an existing SP site.
    2. Download the M&A Separation Project Management Tool (SharePoint) .wsp file from the Mergers & Acquisitions: The Sell Blueprint landing page.
    3. To import a template into your SharePoint environment, do the following:
      1. Open PowerShell.
      2. Connect-SPO Service (need to install PowerShell module).
      3. Enter in your tenant admin URL.
      4. Enter in your admin credentials.
      5. Set-SPO Site https://YourDomain.sharepoint.com/sites/YourSiteHe... -DenyAddAndCustomizePages 0
      OR
      1. Turn on both custom script features to allow users to run custom
    4. Screenshot of the 'Custom Script' option for importing a template into your SharePoint environment. Feature description reads 'Control whether users can run custom script on personal sites and self-service created sites. Note: changes to this setting might take up to 24 hours to take effect. For more information, see http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkIn=397546'. There are options to prevent or allow users from running custom script on personal/self-service created sites.
    5. Enable the SharePoint Server feature.
    6. Upload the .wsp file in Solutions Gallery.
    7. Deploy by creating a subsite and select from custom options.
      • Allow or prevent custom script
      • Security considerations of allowing custom script
      • Save, download, and upload a SharePoint site as a template
    8. Refer to Microsoft documentation to understand security considerations and what is and isn’t supported:

    For more information, check out the SharePoint Template: Step-by-Step Deployment Guide.

    Supporting the transition and establishing service-level agreements

    The purpose of this part of the transition is to ensure both buyer and seller have a full understanding of expectations for after the transaction.

    • Once the organizations have decided to move forward with a deal, all parties need a clear level of agreement.
    • IT, since it is often seen as an operational division of an organization, is often expected to deliver certain services or products once the transaction has officially closed.
    • The purchasing organization or the new company might depend on IT to deliver these services until they are able to provide those services on their own.
    • Having a clear understanding of what the buyer’s expectations are and what your company, as the selling organization, can provide is important.
    • Have a conversation with the buyer and document those expectations in a signed service agreement.

    3.2.4 Identify the buyer's IT expectations

    3-4 hours

    Input: Carve-out roadmap, Separation roadmap, Up-to-date version of the agreement

    Output: Buyer’s IT expectations

    Materials: Questions for meeting

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team, Purchasing company M&A team, Purchasing company IT leadership

    The purpose of this activity is to determine if the buyer has specific service expectations for your IT organization. By identifying, documenting, and agreeing on what services your IT organization will be responsible for, you can obtain a final agreement to protect you as the selling organization.

    1. Buyers should not assume certain services will be provided. Organize a meeting with IT leaders and the company M&A teams to determine what services will be provided.
    2. The next slide has a series of questions that you can start from. Ensure you get detailed information about each of the services.
    3. Once you fully understand the buyer’s IT expectations, create an SLA in the next activity and obtain sign-off from both organizations.

    Questions to ask the buyer

    1. What services would you like my IT organization to provide?
    2. How long do you anticipate those services will be provided to you?
    3. How do you expect your staff/employees to communicate requests or questions to my staff/employees?
    4. Are there certain days or times that you expect these services to be delivered?
    5. How many staff do you expect should be available to support you?
    6. What should be the acceptable response time on given service requests?
    7. When it comes to the services you require, what level of support should we provide?
    8. If a service requires escalation to Level 2 or Level 3 support, are we still expected to support this service? Or are we only Level 1 support?
    9. What preventative security methods does your organization have to protect our environment during this agreement period?

    3.2.5 Create a service/ transaction agreement

    6 hours

    Input: Buyer's expectations, Separation roadmap

    Output: SLA for the purchasing organization

    Materials: Service Catalog Internal Service Level Agreement Template, M&A Separation Project Plan Tool (SharePoint), M&A Separation Project Plan Tool (Excel)

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team, Purchasing company M&A team, Purchasing company IT leadership

    The purpose of this activity is to determine if the buyer has specific service expectations for your IT organization post-transaction that your IT organization is agreeing to provide.

    1. Document the expected services and the related details in a service-level agreement.
    2. Provide the SLA to the purchasing organization.
    3. Obtain sign-off from both organizations on the level of service that is expected of IT.
    4. Update the M&A Separation Project Management Tool Excel or SharePoint document to reflect any additional items that the purchasing organization identified.

    *For organizations being purchased in their entirety, this activity may not be relevant.

    Modify the Service Catalog Internal Service Level Agreement with the agreed-upon terms of the SLA.

    Importance of estimating separation costs

    Change is the key driver of separation costs

    Separation costs are dependent on the following:
    • Meeting synergy targets – whether that be cost saving or growth related.
      • Employee-related costs, licensing, and reconfiguration fees play a huge part in meeting synergy targets.
    • Adjustments related to compliance or regulations – especially if there are changes to legal entities, reporting requirements, or risk mitigation standards.
    • Governance or third party–related support required to ensure timelines are met and the separation is a success.
    Separation costs vary by industry type.
    • Certain industries may have separation costs made up of mostly one type, differing from other industries, due to the complexity and demands of the transaction. For example:
      • Healthcare separation costs are mostly driven by regulatory, safety, and quality standards, as well as consolidation of the research and development function.
      • Energy and Utilities tend to have the lowest separation costs due to most transactions occurring within the same sector rather than as cross-sector investments. For example, oil and gas transactions tend to be for oil fields and rigs (strategic fixed assets), which can easily be added to the buyer’s portfolio.

    Separation costs are more related to the degree of change required than the size of the transaction.

    3.2.6 Estimate separation costs

    3-4 hours

    Input: Separation tasks, Transition team, Valuation of current IT environment, Valuation of target IT environment, Outputs from data room, Technical debt, Employees

    Output: List of anticipated costs required to support IT separation

    Materials: Separation task checklist, Separation roadmap, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team, Transition team

    The purpose of this activity is to estimate the costs that will be associated with the separation. Identify and communicate a realistic figure to the larger M&A team within your company as early in the process as possible. This ensures that the funding required for the transaction is secured and budgeted for in the overarching transaction.

    1. On the associated slide in the M&A Sell Playbook, input:
      • Task
      • Domain
      • Cost type
      • Total cost amount
      • Level of certainty around the cost
    2. Provide a copy of the estimated costs to the company’s M&A team. Also provide any additional information identified earlier to help them understand the importance of those costs.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Employee transition planning

    Considering employee impact will be a huge component to ensure successful separation

    • Meet With Leadership
    • Plan Individual and Department Redeployment
    • Plan Individual and Department Layoffs
    • Monitor and Manage Departmental Effectiveness
    • For employees, the transition could mean:
      • Changing from their current role to a new role to meet requirements and expectations throughout the transition.
      • Being laid off because the role they are currently occupying has been made redundant.
    • It is important to plan for what the M&A separation needs will be and what the IT operational needs will be.
    • A lack of foresight into this long-term plan could lead to undue costs and headaches trying to retain critical staff, rehiring positions that were already let go, and keeping redundant employees longer then necessary.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Being transparent throughout the process is critical. Do not hesitate to tell employees the likelihood that their job may be made redundant. This will ensure a high level of trust and credibility for those who remain with the organization after the transaction.

    3.2.7 Create an employee transition plan

    3-4 hours

    Input: IT strategy, IT organizational design

    Output: Employee transition plans

    Materials: M&A Sell Playbook, Whiteboard, Sticky notes, Markers

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team, Transition team

    The purpose of this activity is to create a transition plan for employees.

    1. Transition planning can be done at specific individual levels or more broadly to reflect a single role. Consider these four items in the transition plan:
      • Understand the direction of the employee transitions.
      • Identify employees that will be involved in the transition (moved or laid off).
      • Prepare to meet with employees.
      • Meet with employees.
    2. For each employee that will be facing some sort of change in their regular role, permanent or temporary, create a transition plan.
    3. For additional information on transitioning employees, review the blueprint Streamline Your Workforce During a Pandemic.

    **Note that if someone’s future role is a layoff, then there is no need to record anything for skills needed or method for skill development.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    3.2.8 Create functional workplans for employees

    3-4 hours

    Input: Prioritized separation tasks, Employee transition plan, Separation RACI, Costs for activities, Activity owners

    Output: Employee functional workplans

    Materials: M&A Sell Playbook, Learning and development tools

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, IT management team, Company M&A team, Transition team

    The purpose of this activity is to create a functional workplan for the different employees so that they know what their key role and responsibilities are once the transaction occurs.

    1. First complete the transition plan from the previous activity (3.2.7) and the separation roadmap. Have these documents ready to review throughout this process.
    2. Identify the employees who will be transitioning to a new role permanently or temporarily. Creating a functional workplan is especially important for these employees.
    3. Identify the skills these employees need to have to support the separation. Record this in the corresponding slide in the M&A Sell Playbook.
    4. For each employee, identify someone who will be a point of contact for them throughout the transition.

    It is recommended that each employee have a functional workplan. Leverage the IT managers to support this task.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Metrics for separation

    Valuation & Due Diligence

    • % Defects discovered in production
    • $ Cost per user for enterprise applications
    • % In-house-built applications vs. enterprise applications
    • % Owners identified for all data domains
    • # IT staff asked to participate in due diligence
    • Change to due diligence
    • IT budget variance
    • Synergy target

    Execution & Value Realization

    • % Satisfaction with the effectiveness of IT capabilities
    • % Overall end-customer satisfaction
    • $ Impact of vendor SLA breaches
    • $ Savings through cost-optimization efforts
    • $ Savings through application rationalization and technology standardization
    • # Key positions empty
    • % Frequency of staff turnover
    • % Emergency changes
    • # Hours of unplanned downtime
    • % Releases that cause downtime
    • % Incidents with identified problem record
    • % Problems with identified root cause
    • # Days from problem identification to root cause fix
    • % Projects that consider IT risk
    • % Incidents due to issues not addressed in the security plan
    • # Average vulnerability remediation time
    • % Application budget spent on new build/buy vs. maintenance (deferred feature implementation, enhancements, bug fixes)
    • # Time (days) to value realization
    • % Projects that realized planned benefits
    • $ IT operational savings and cost reductions that are related to synergies/divestitures
    • % IT staff–related expenses/redundancies
    • # Days spent on IT separation
    • $ Accurate IT budget estimates
    • % Revenue growth directly tied to IT delivery
    • % Profit margin growth

    3.2.9 Align project metrics with identified tasks

    3-4 hours

    Input: Prioritized separation tasks, Employee transition plan, Separation RACI, Costs for activities, Activity owners, M&A goals

    Output: Separation-specific metrics to measure success

    Materials: Separation roadmap, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Transition team

    The purpose of this activity is to understand how to measure the success of the separation project by aligning metrics to each identified task.

    1. Review the M&A goals identified by the business. Your metrics will need to tie back to those business goals.
    2. Identify metrics that align to identified tasks and measure achievement of those goals. For each metric you consider, ask the following questions:
      • What is the main goal or objective that this metric is trying to solve?
      • What does success look like?
      • Does the metric promote the right behavior?
      • Is the metric actionable? What is the story you are trying to tell with this metric?
      • How often will this get measured?
      • Are there any metrics it supports or is supported by?

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    By the end of this mid-transaction phase you should:

    Have successfully evaluated your IT people, processes, and technology to determine a roadmap forward for separating or selling.

    Key outcomes from the Due Diligence & Preparation phase
    • Participate in due diligence activities to comply with regulatory and auditing standards and prepare employees for the transition.
    • Create a separation roadmap that considers the tasks that will need to be completed and the resources required to support separation.
    Key deliverables from the Due Diligence & Preparation phase
    • Drive value with a due diligence charter
    • Gather data room artifacts
    • Measure staff engagement
    • Assess culture
    • Create a carve-out roadmap
    • Prioritize separation tasks
    • Establish the separation roadmap
    • Identify the buyer’s IT expectations
    • Create a service/transaction agreement
    • Estimate separation costs
    • Create an employee transition plan
    • Create functional workplans for employees
    • Align project metrics with identified tasks

    M&A Sell Blueprint

    Phase 4

    Execution & Value Realization

    Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3

    Phase 4

    • 1.1 Identify Stakeholders and Their Perspective of IT
    • 1.2 Assess IT’s Current Value and Future State
    • 1.3 Drive Innovation and Suggest Reduction Opportunities
    • 2.1 Establish the M&A Program Plan
    • 2.2 Prepare IT to Engage in the Separation or Sale
    • 3.1 Engage in Due Diligence and Prepare Staff
    • 3.2 Prepare to Separate
    • 4.1 Execute the Transaction
    • 4.2 Reflection and Value Realization

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Monitor service agreements
    • Continually update the project plan
    • Confirm separation costs
    • Review IT’s transaction value
    • Conduct a transaction and separation SWOT
    • Review the playbook and prepare for future transactions

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • IT executive/CIO
    • IT senior leadership
    • Vendor management team
    • IT transaction team
    • Company M&A team

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Pre-Work

    Day 1

    Day 2

    Day 3

    Engage in Separation

    Day 4

    Establish the Transaction FoundationDiscover the Motivation for IntegrationPlan the Separation RoadmapPrepare Employees for the TransitionEngage in SeparationAssess the Transaction Outcomes (Must be within 30 days of transaction date)

    Activities

    • 0.1 Identify the rationale for the company's decision to pursue a divestiture/sale.
    • 0.2 Identify key stakeholders and determine the IT transaction team.
    • 0.3 Gather and evaluate the M&A strategy, future-state operating model, and governance.
    • 1.1 Review the business rationale for the divestiture/sale.
    • 1.2 Identify pain points and opportunities tied to the divestiture/sale.
    • 1.3 Establish the separation strategy.
    • 1.4 Create the due diligence charter.
    • 2.1 Prioritize separation tasks.
    • 2.2 Establish the separation roadmap.
    • 2.3 Establish and align project metrics with identified tasks.
    • 2.4 Estimate separation costs.
    • 3.1 Measure staff engagement
    • 3.2 Assess the current culture and identify the goal culture.
    • 3.3 Create an employee transition plan.
    • 3.4 Create functional workplans for employees.
    • S.1 Complete the separation by regularly updating the project plan.
    • S.2 Assess the service/technical transaction agreement.
    • 4.1 Confirm separation costs.
    • 4.2 Review IT’s transaction value.
    • 4.3 Conduct a transaction and separation SWOT.
    • 4.4 Review the playbook and prepare for future transactions.

    Deliverables

    1. IT strategy
    2. IT operating model
    3. IT governance structure
    4. M&A transaction team
    1. Business context implications for IT
    2. Separation strategy
    3. Due diligence charter
    1. Separation roadmap and associated resourcing
    1. Engagement assessment
    2. Culture assessment
    3. Employee transition plans and workplans
    1. Evaluate service/technical transaction agreement
    2. Updated separation project plan
    1. SWOT of transaction
    2. M&A Sell Playbook refined for future transactions

    What is the Execution & Value Realization phase?

    Post-transaction state

    Once the transaction comes to a close, it’s time for IT to deliver on the critical separation tasks. As the selling organization in this transaction, you need to ensure you have a roadmap that properly enables the ongoing delivery of your IT environment while simultaneously delivering the necessary services to the purchasing organization.

    Throughout the separation transaction, some of the most common obstacles IT should prepare for include difficulty separating the IT environment, loss of key personnel, disengaged employees, and security/compliance issues.

    Post-transaction, the business needs to understands the value they received by engaging in the transaction and the ongoing revenue they might obtain as a result of the sale. You also need to ensure that the IT environment is functioning and mitigating any high-risk outcomes.

    Goal: To carry out the planned separation activities and deliver the intended value to the business.

    Execution Prerequisite Checklist

    Before coming into the Execution & Value Realization phase, you must have addressed the following:

    • Understand the rationale for the company's decisions to pursue a sale or divestiture and what opportunities or pain points the sale should alleviate.
    • Identify the key roles for the transaction team.
    • Identify the M&A governance.
    • Determine target metrics.
    • Select a separation strategy framework.
    • Conduct a RACI for key transaction tasks for the transaction team.
    • Create a carve-out roadmap.
    • Prioritize separation tasks.
    • Establish the separation roadmap.
    • Create employee transition plans.

    Before coming into the Execution & Value Realization phase, we recommend addressing the following:

    • Create vision and mission statements.
    • Establish guiding principles.
    • Create a future-state operating model.
    • Identify the M&A operating model.
    • Document the communication plan.
    • Examine the business perspective of IT.
    • Identify key stakeholders and outline their relationship to the M&A process.
    • Establish a due diligence charter.
    • Be able to valuate the IT environment and communicate IT’s value to the business.
    • Gather and present due diligence data room artifacts.
    • Measure staff engagement.
    • Assess and plan for culture.
    • Estimate separation costs.
    • Create functional workplans for employees.
    • Identify the buyer’s IT expectations.
    • Create a service/ transaction agreement.

    Separation checklists

    Prerequisite Checklist
    • Build the project plan for separation and prioritize activities
      • Plan first day
      • Plan first 30/100 days
      • Plan first year
    • Create an organization-aligned IT strategy
    • Identify critical stakeholders
    • Create a communication strategy
    • Understand the rationale for the sale or divestiture
    • Develop IT's sale/divestiture strategy
      • Determine goal opportunities
      • Create the mission and vision statements
      • Create the guiding principles
      • Create program metrics
    • Consolidate reports from due diligence/data room
    • Conduct culture assessment
    • Create a transaction team
    • Establish a service/technical transaction agreement
    • Plan and communicate culture changes
    • Create an employee transition plan
    • Assess baseline engagement
    Business
    • Design an enterprise architecture
    • Document your business architecture
    • Meet compliance and regulatory standards
    • Identify and assess all of IT's risks
    Applications
    • Prioritize and address critical applications
      • CRM
      • HRIS
      • Financial
      • Sales
      • Risk
      • Security
      • ERP
      • Email
    • Develop method of separating applications
    • Model critical applications that have dependencies on one another
    • Identify the infrastructure capacity required to support critical applications
    • Prioritize and address critical applications
    Leadership/IT Executive
    • Build an IT budget
    • Structure operating budget
    • Structure capital budget
    • Identify the workforce demand vs. capacity
    • Establish and monitor key metrics
    • Communicate value realized/cost savings
    Data
    • Confirm data strategy
    • Confirm data governance
    • Build a data architecture roadmap
    • Analyze data sources and domains
    • Evaluate data storage (on-premises vs. cloud)
    • Develop an enterprise content management strategy and roadmap
    • Ensure cleanliness/usability of data sets
    • Identify data sets that can remain operational if reduced/separated
    • Develop reporting and analytics capabilities
    • Confirm data strategy
    Operations
    • Manage sales access to customer data
    • Determine locations and hours of operation
    • Separate/terminate phone lists and extensions
    • Split email address books
    • Communicate helpdesk/service desk information

    Separation checklists (continued)

    Infrastructure
    • Manage organization domains
    • Consolidate data centers
    • Compile inventory of vendors, versions, switches, and routers
    • Review hardware lease or purchase agreements
    • Review outsourcing/service provider agreements
    • Review service-level agreements
    • Assess connectivity linkages between locations
    • Plan to migrate to a single email system if necessary
    • Determine network access concerns
    Vendors
    • Establish a sustainable vendor management office
    • Review vendor landscape
    • Identify warranty options
    • Identify the licensing grant
    • Rationalize vendor services and solutions
    People
    • Design an IT operating model
    • Design your future IT organizational structure
    • Conduct a RACI for prioritized activities
    • Conduct a culture assessment and identify goal IT culture
    • Build an IT employee engagement program
    • Determine critical roles and systems/process/products they support
    • Define new job descriptions with meaningful roles and responsibilities
    • Create employee transition plans
    • Create functional workplans
    Projects
    • Identify projects to be on hold
    • Communicate project intake process
    • Reprioritize projects
    Products & Services
    • Redefine service catalog
    • Ensure customer interaction requirements are met
    • Select a solution for product lifecycle management
    • Plan service-level agreements
    Security
    • Conduct a security assessment
    • Develop accessibility prioritization and schedule
    • Establish an information security strategy
    • Develop a security awareness and training program
    • Develop and manage security governance, risk, and compliance
    • Identify security budget
    • Build a data privacy and classification program
    IT Processes
    • Evaluate current process models
    • Determine productivity/capacity levels of processes
    • Identify processes to be changed/terminated
    • Establish a communication plan
    • Develop a change management process
    • Establish/review IT policies
    • Evaluate current process models

    Execution & Value Realization

    Step 4.1

    Execute the Transaction

    Activities

    • 4.1.1 Monitor service agreements
    • 4.1.2 Continually update the project plan

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Monitor service agreements
    • Continually update the project plan

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive/CIO
    • IT senior leadership
    • Vendor management team
    • IT transaction team
    • Company M&A team

    Outcomes of Step

    Successfully execute the separation of the IT environments and update the project plan, strategizing against any roadblocks as they come.

    Key concerns to monitor during separation

    If you are entering the transaction at this point, consider and monitor the following three items above all else.

    Your IT environment, reputation as an IT leader, and impact on key staff will depend on monitoring these aspects.

    • Risk & Security. Make sure that the channels of communication between the purchasing organization and your IT environment are properly determined and protected. This might include updating or removing employees’ access to certain programs.
    • Retaining Employees. Employees who do not see a path forward in the organization or who feel that their skills are being underused will be quick to move on. Make sure they are engaged before, during, and after the transaction to avoid losing employees.
    • IT Environment Dependencies. Testing the IT environment several times and obtaining sign-off from auditors that this has been completed correctly should be completed well before the transaction occurs. Have a strong architecture outlining technical dependencies.

    For more information, review:

    • Reduce and Manage Your Organization’s Insider Threat Risk
    • Map Technical Skills for a Changing Infrastructure Operations Organization
    • Build a Data Architecture Roadmap

    4.1.1 Monitor service agreements

    3-6 months

    Input: Original service agreement, Risk register

    Output: Service agreement confirmed

    Materials: Original service agreement

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, External organization IT senior leadership

    The purpose of this activity is to monitor the established service agreements on an ongoing basis. Your organization is most at risk during the initial months following the transaction.

    1. Ensure the right controls exist to prevent the organization from unnecessarily opening itself up to risks.
    2. Meet with the purchasing organization/subsidiary three months after the transaction to ensure that everyone is satisfied with the level of services provided.
    3. This is not a quick and completed activity, but one that requires ongoing monitoring. Repeatedly identify potential risks worth mitigating.

    For additional information and support for this activity, see the blueprint Build an IT Risk Management Program.

    4.1.2 Continually update the project plan

    Reoccurring basis following transition

    Input: Prioritized separation tasks, Separation RACI, Activity owners

    Output: Updated separation project plan

    Materials: M&A Separation Project Plan Tool (SharePoint), M&A Separation Project Plan Tool (Excel)

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, IT transaction team, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to ensure that the project plan is continuously updated as your transaction team continues to execute on the various components outlined in the project plan.

    1. Set a regular cadence for the transaction team to meet, update the project plan, review the status of the various separation task items, and strategize how to overcome any roadblocks.
    2. Employ governance best practices in these meetings to ensure decisions can be made effectively and resources allocated strategically.

    Record the updates in the M&A Separation Project Management Tool (SharePoint).

    Record the updates in the M&A Separation Project Management Tool (Excel).

    Execution & Value Realization

    Step 4.2

    Reflection and Value Realization

    Activities

    • 4.2.1 Confirm separation costs
    • 4.2.2 Review IT’s transaction value
    • 4.2.3 Conduct a transaction and separation SWOT
    • 4.2.4 Review the playbook and prepare for future transactions

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive/CIO
    • IT senior leadership
    • Transition team
    • Company M&A team

    Outcomes of Step

    Review the value that IT was able to generate around the transaction and strategize about how to improve future selling or separating transactions.

    4.2.1 Confirm separation costs

    3-4 hours

    Input: Separation tasks, Carve-out roadmap, Transition team, Previous RACI, Estimated separation costs

    Output: Actual separation costs

    Materials: M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Transaction team, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to confirm the associated costs around separation. While the separation costs would have been estimated previously, it’s important to confirm the costs that were associated with the separation in order to provide an accurate and up-to-date report to the company’s M&A team.

    1. Taking all the original items identified previously in activity 3.2.6, identify if there were changes in the estimated costs. This can be an increase or a decrease.
    2. Ensure that each cost has a justification for why the cost changed from the original estimation.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Track cost savings and revenue generation

    Throughout the transaction, the business would have communicated its goals, rationales, and expectations for the transaction. Sometimes this is done explicitly, and other times the information is implicit. Either way, IT needs to ensure that metrics have been defined and are measuring the intended value that the business expects. Ensure that the benefits realized to the organization are being communicated regularly and frequently.

    1. Define Metrics: Select metrics to track synergies through the separation.
      1. You can track value by looking at percentages of improvement in process-level metrics depending on the savings or revenue being pursued.
      2. For example, if the value being pursued is decreasing costs, metrics could range from capacity to output, highlighting that the output remains high despite smaller IT environments.
    2. Prioritize Value-Driving Initiatives: Estimate the cost and benefit of each initiative's implementation to compare the amount of business value to the cost. The benefits and costs should be illustrated at a high level. Estimating the exact dollar value of fulfilling a synergy can be difficult and misleading.
        Steps
      • Determine the benefits that each initiative is expected to deliver.
      • Determine the high-level costs of implementation (capacity, time, resources, effort).
    3. Track Cost Savings and Revenue Generation: Develop a detailed workplan to resource the roadmap and track where costs are saved and revenue is generated as the initiatives are undertaken.

    4.2.2 Review IT’s transaction value

    3-4 hours

    Input: Prioritized separation tasks, Separation RACI, Activity owners, M&A company goals

    Output: Transaction value

    Materials: M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company's M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to track how your IT organization performed against the originally identified metrics.

    1. If your organization did not have the opportunity to identify metrics, determine from the company M&A what those metrics might be. Review activity 3.2.9 for more information on metrics.
    2. Identify whether the metric (which should support a goal) was at, below, or above the original target metric. This is a very critical task for IT to complete because it allows IT to confirm that they were successful in the transaction and that the business can count on them in future transactions.
    3. Be sure to record accurate and relevant information on why the outcomes (good or bad) are supporting the M&A goals set out by the business.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    4.2.3 Conduct a transaction and separation SWOT

    2 hours

    Input: Separation costs, Retention rates, Value that IT contributed to the transaction

    Output: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats

    Materials: Flip charts, Markers, Sticky notes

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Business transaction team

    The purpose of this activity is to assess the positive and negative elements of the transaction.

    1. Consider the internal and external elements that could have impacted the outcome of the transaction.
      • Strengths. Internal characteristics that are favorable as they relate to your development environment.
      • Weaknesses Internal characteristics that are unfavorable or need improvement.
      • Opportunities External characteristics that you may use to your advantage.
      • Threats External characteristics that may be potential sources of failure or risk.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    M&A Sell Playbook review

    With an acquisition complete, your IT organization is now more prepared then ever to support the business through future M&As

    • Now that the transaction is more than 80% complete, take the opportunity to review the key elements that worked well and the opportunities for improvement.
    • Critically examine the M&A Sell Playbook your IT organization created and identify what worked well to help the transaction and where your organization could adjust to do better in future transactions.
    • If your organization were to engage in another sale or divestiture under your IT leadership, how would you go about the transaction to make sure the company meets its goals?

    4.2.4 Review the playbook and prepare for future transactions

    4 hours

    Input: Transaction and separation SWOT

    Output: Refined M&A playbook

    Materials: M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO

    The purpose of this activity is to revise the playbook and ensure it is ready to go for future transactions.

    1. Using the outputs from the previous activity, 4.2.3, determine what strengths and opportunities there were that should be leveraged in the next transaction.
    2. Likewise, determine which threats and weaknesses could be avoided in the future transactions.
      Remember, this is your M&A Sell Playbook, and it should reflect the most successful outcome for you in your organization.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    By the end of this post-transaction phase you should:

    Have completed the separation post-transaction and be fluidly delivering the critical value that the business expected of IT.

    Key outcomes from the Execution & Value Realization phase
    • Ensure the separation tasks are being completed and that any blockers related to the transaction are being removed.
    • Determine where IT was able to realize value for the business and demonstrate IT’s involvement in meeting target goals.
    Key deliverables from the Execution & Value Realization phase
    • Monitor service agreements
    • Continually update the project plan
    • Confirm separation costs
    • Review IT’s transaction value
    • Conduct a transaction and separation SWOT
    • Review the playbook and prepare for future transactions

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Problem Solved

    Congratulations, you have completed the M&A Sell Blueprint!

    Rather than reacting to a transaction, you have been proactive in tackling this initiative. You now have a process to fall back on in which you can be an innovative IT leader by suggesting how and why the business should engage in a separation or sale transaction. You have:

    • Created a standardized approach for how your IT organization should address divestitures or sales.
    • Retained critical staff and complied with any regulations throughout the transaction.
    • Delivered on the separation project plan successfully and communicated IT’s transaction value to the business.

    Now that you have done all of this, reflect on what went well and what can be improved if you were to engage in a similar divestiture or sale again.

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

    Contact your account representative for more information
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8899

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Ibrahim Abdel-Kader
    Research Analyst | CIO
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Brittany Lutes
    Senior Research Analyst | CIO
    Info-Tech Research Group
    John Annand
    Principal Research Director | Infrastructure
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Scott Bickley
    Principal Research Director | Vendor Management
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Cole Cioran
    Practice Lead | Applications
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Dana Daher
    Research Analyst | Strategy & Innovation
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Eric Dolinar
    Manager | M&A Consulting
    Deloitte Canada
    Christoph Egel
    Director, Solution Design & Deliver
    Cooper Tire & Rubber Company
    Nora Fisher
    Vice President | Executive Services Advisory
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Larry Fretz
    Vice President | Industry
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Research Contributors and Experts

    David Glazer
    Vice President of Analytics
    Kroll
    Jack Hakimian
    Senior Vice President | Workshops and Delivery
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Gord Harrison
    Senior Vice President | Research & Advisory
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Valence Howden
    Principal Research Director | CIO
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Jennifer Jones
    Research Director | Industry
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Nancy McCuaig
    Senior Vice President | Chief Technology and Data Office
    IGM Financial Inc.
    Carlene McCubbin
    Practice Lead | CIO
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Kenneth McGee
    Research Fellow | Strategy & Innovation
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Nayma Naser
    Associate
    Deloitte
    Andy Neill
    Practice Lead | Data & Analytics, Enterprise Architecture
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Rick Pittman
    Vice President | Research
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Rocco Rao
    Research Director | Industry
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Mark Rosa
    Senior Vice President & Chief Information Officer
    Mohegan Gaming and Entertainment
    Tracy-Lynn Reid
    Research Lead | People & Leadership
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Jim Robson
    Senior Vice President | Shared Enterprise Services (retired)
    Great-West Life
    Steven Schmidt
    Senior Managing Partner Advisory | Executive Services
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Nikki Seventikidis
    Senior Manager | Finance Initiative & Continuous Improvement
    CST Consultants Inc.
    Allison Straker
    Research Director | CIO
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Justin Waelz
    Senior Network & Systems Administrator
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Sallie Wright
    Executive Counselor
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Bibliography

    “5 Ways for CIOs to Accelerate Value During Mergers and Acquisitions.” Okta, n.d. Web.

    Altintepe, Hakan. “Mergers and acquisitions speed up digital transformation.” CIO.com, 27 July 2018. Web.

    “America’s elite law firms are booming.” The Economist, 15 July 2021. Web.

    Barbaglia, Pamela, and Joshua Franklin. “Global M&A sets Q1 record as dealmakers shape post-COVID world.” Nasdaq, 1 April 2021. Web.

    Boyce, Paul. “Mergers and Acquisitions Definition: Types, Advantages, and Disadvantages.” BoyceWire, 8 Oct. 2020. Web.

    Bradt, George. “83% Of Mergers Fail -- Leverage A 100-Day Action Plan For Success Instead.” Forbes, 27 Jan. 2015. Web.

    Capgemini. “Mergers and Acquisitions: Get CIOs, IT Leaders Involved Early.” Channel e2e, 19 June 2020. Web.

    Chandra, Sumit, et al. “Make Or Break: The Critical Role Of IT In Post-Merger Integration.” IMAA Institute, 2016. Web.

    Deloitte. “How to Calculate Technical Debt.” The Wall Street Journal, 21 Jan. 2015. Web.

    Ernst & Young. “IT As A Driver Of M&A Success.” IMAA Institute, 2017. Web.

    Fernandes, Nuno. “M&As In 2021: How To Improve The Odds Of A Successful Deal.” Forbes, 23 March 2021. Web.

    “Five steps to a better 'technology fit' in mergers and acquisitions.” BCS, 7 Nov. 2019. Web.

    Fricke, Pierre. “The Biggest Opportunity You’re Missing During an M&Aamp; IT Integration.” Rackspace, 4 Nov. 2020. Web.

    Garrison, David W. “Most Mergers Fail Because People Aren't Boxes.” Forbes, 24 June 2019. Web.

    Harroch, Richard. “What You Need To Know About Mergers & Acquisitions: 12 Key Considerations When Selling Your Company.” Forbes, 27 Aug. 2018. Web.

    Hope, Michele. “M&A Integration: New Ways To Contain The IT Cost Of Mergers, Acquisitions And Migrations.” Iron Mountain, n.d. Web.

    “How Agile Project Management Principles Can Modernize M&A.” Business.com, 13 April 2020. Web.

    Hull, Patrick. “Answer 4 Questions to Get a Great Mission Statement.” Forbes, 10 Jan. 2013. Web.

    Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. “What We Can Learn About Unity from Hostile Takeovers.” Harvard Business Review, 12 Nov. 2020. Web.

    Koller, Tim, et al. “Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies, 7th edition.” McKinsey & Company, 2020. Web.

    Labate, John. “M&A Alternatives Take Center Stage: Survey.” The Wall Street Journal, 30 Oct. 2020. Web.

    Lerner, Maya Ber. “How to Calculate ROI on Infrastructure Automation.” DevOps.com, 1 July 2020. Web.

    Loten, Angus. “Companies Without a Tech Plan in M&A Deals Face Higher IT Costs.” The Wall Street Journal, 18 June 2019. Web.

    Low, Jia Jen. “Tackling the tech integration challenge of mergers today” Tech HQ, 6 Jan. 2020. Web.

    Lucas, Suzanne. “5 Reasons Turnover Should Scare You.” Inc. 22 March 2013. Web.

    “M&A Trends Survey: The future of M&A. Deal trends in a changing world.” Deloitte, Oct. 2020. Web.

    Maheshwari, Adi, and Manish Dabas. “Six strategies tech companies are using for successful divesting.” EY, 1 Aug. 2020. Web.

    Majaski, Christina. “Mergers and Acquisitions: What's the Difference?” Investopedia, 30 Apr. 2021.

    “Mergers & Acquisitions: Top 5 Technology Considerations.” Teksetra, 21 Jul. 2020. Web.

    “Mergers Acquisitions M&A Process.” Corporate Finance Institute, n.d. Web.

    “Mergers and acquisitions: A means to gain technology and expertise.” DLA Piper, 2020. Web.

    Nash, Kim S. “CIOs Take Larger Role in Pre-IPO Prep Work.” The Wall Street Journal, 5 March 2015. Web.

    O'Connell, Sean, et al. “Divestitures: How to Invest for Success.” McKinsey, 1 Aug. 2015. Web

    Paszti, Laila. “Canada: Emerging Trends In Information Technology (IT) Mergers And Acquisitions.” Mondaq, 24 Oct. 2019. Web.

    Patel, Kiison. “The 8 Biggest M&A Failures of All Time” Deal Room, 9 Sept. 2021. Web.

    Peek, Sean, and Paula Fernandes. “What Is a Vision Statement?” Business News Daily, 7 May 2020. Web.

    Ravid, Barak. “How divestments can re-energize the technology growth story.” EY, 14 July 2021. Web.

    Ravid, Barak. “Tech execs focus on growth amid increasingly competitive M&A market.” EY, 28 April 2021. Web.

    Resch, Scott. “5 Questions with a Mergers & Acquisitions Expert.” CIO, 25 June 2019. Web.

    Salsberg, Brian. “Four tips for estimating one-time M&A integration costs.” EY, 17 Oct. 2019. Web.

    Samuels, Mark. “Mergers and acquisitions: Five ways tech can smooth the way.” ZDNet, 15 Aug. 2018. Web.

    “SAP Divestiture Projects: Options, Approach and Challenges.” Cognizant, May, 2014. Web.

    Steeves, Dave. “7 Rules for Surviving a Merger & Acquisition Technology Integration.” Steeves and Associates, 5 Feb. 2020. Web.

    Tanaszi, Margaret. “Calculating IT Value in Business Terms.” CSO, 27 May 2004. Web.

    “The CIO Playbook. Nine Steps CIOs Must Take For Successful Divestitures.” SNP, 2016. Web.

    “The Role of IT in Supporting Mergers and Acquisitions.” Cognizant, Feb. 2015. Web.

    Torres, Roberto. “M&A playbook: How to prepare for the cost, staff and tech hurdles.” CIO Dive, 14 Nov. 2019. Web.

    “Valuation Methods.” Corporate Finance Institute, n.d. Web.

    Weller, Joe. “The Ultimate Guide to the M&A Process for Buyers and Sellers.” Smartsheet, 16 May 2019. Web.

    Learn the right way to manage metrics

    • Parent Category Name: Improve Your Processes
    • Parent Category Link: /improve-your-processes

    Learn to use metrics in the right way. Avoid staff (subconciously) gaming the numbers, as it is only natural to try to achieve the objective. This is really a case of be careful what you wish for, you may just get it.

    Register to read more …

    Security Priorities 2022

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}244|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Security Strategy & Budgeting
    • Parent Category Link: /security-strategy-and-budgeting
    • Ransomware activities and the cost of breaches are on the rise.
    • Cybersecurity talent is hard to find, and an increasing number of cybersecurity professionals are considering leaving their jobs.
    • Moving to the digital world increases the risk of a breach.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • The pandemic has fundamentally changed the technology landscape. Security programs must understand how their threat surface is now different and adapt their controls to meet the challenge.
    • The upside to the upheaval in 2021 is new opportunities to modernize your security program.

    Impact and Result

    • Use the report to ensure your plan in 2022 addresses what’s important in cybersecurity.
    • Understand the current situation in the cybersecurity space.

    Security Priorities 2022 Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Security Priorities 2022 – A report that describes priorities and recommendations for CISOs in 2022.

    Use this report to understand the current situation in the cybersecurity space and inform your plan for 2022. This report includes sections on protecting against and responding to ransomware, acquiring and retaining talent, securing a remote workforce, securing digital transformation, and adopting zero trust.

    • Security Priorities for 2022 Report

    Infographic

    Further reading

    Security Priorities 2022

    The pandemic has changed how we work

    disruptions to the way we work caused by the pandemic are here to stay.

    The pandemic has introduced a lot of changes to our lives over the past two years, and this is also true for various aspects of how we work. In particular, a large workforce moved online overnight, which shifted the work environment rapidly.

    People changed how they communicate, how they access company information, and how they connect to the company network. These changes make cybersecurity a more important focus than ever.

    Although changes like the shift to remote work occurred in response to the pandemic, they are largely expected to remain, regardless of the progression of the pandemic itself. This report will look into important security trends and the priorities that stemmed from these trends.

    30% more professionals expect transformative permanent change compared to one year ago.

    47% of professionals expect a lot of permanent change; this remains the same as last year. (Source: Info-Tech Tech Trends 2022 Survey; N=475)

    The cost of a security breach is rising steeply

    The shift to remote work exposes organizations to more costly cyber incidents than ever before.

    $4.24 million

    Average cost of a data breach in 2021
    The cost of a data breach rose by nearly 10% in the past year, the highest rate in over seven years.

    $1.07 million

    More costly when remote work involved in the breach

    The average cost of breaches where remote work is involved is $1.07 million higher than breaches where remote work is not involved.

    The ubiquitous remote work that we saw in 2021 and continue to see in 2022 can lead to more costly security events. (Source: IBM, 2021)

    Remote work is here to stay, and the cost of a breach is higher when remote work is involved.

    The cost comes not only directly from payments but also indirectly from reputational loss. (Source: IBM, 2021)

    Security teams can participate in the solution

    The numbers are clear: in 2022, when we face a threat environment like WE’VE never EXPERIENCED before, good security is worth the investment

    $1.76 million

    Saved when zero trust is deployed facing a breach

    Zero trust controls are realistic and effective controls.

    Organizations that implement zero trust dramatically reduce the cost of an adverse security event.

    35%

    More costly if it takes more than 200 days to identify and contain a breach

    With increased BYOD and remote work, detection and response is more challenging than ever before – but it is also highly effective.

    Organizations that detect and respond to incidents quickly will significantly reduce the impact. (Source: IBM, 2021)

    Breaches are 34% less costly when mature zero trust is implemented.

    A fully staffed and well-prepared security team could save the cost through quick responses. (Source: IBM, 2021)

    Top security priorities and constraints in 2022

    Survey results

    As part of its research process for the 2022 Security Priorities Report, Info-Tech Research Group surveyed security and IT leaders (N=97) to ask their top security priorities as well as their main obstacles to security success in 2022:

    Top Priorities
    A list of the top three priorities identified in the survey with their respective percentages, 'Acquiring and retaining talent, 30%', 'Protecting against and responding to ransomware, 23%', and 'Securing a remote workforce, 23%'.

    Survey respondents were asked to force-rank their security priorities.

    Among the priorities chosen most frequently as #1 were talent management, addressing ransomware threats, and securing hybrid/remote work.

    Top Obstacles
    A list of the top three obstacles identified in the survey with their respective percentages, 'Staffing constraints, 31%', 'Demand of ever-changing business environment, 23%', and 'Budget constraints, 15%'.

    Talent management is both the #1 priority and the top obstacle facing security leaders in 2022.

    Unsurprisingly, the ever-changing environment in a world emerging from a pandemic and budget constraints are also top obstacles.

    We know the priorities…

    But what are security leaders actually working on?

    This report details what we see the world demanding of security leaders in the coming year.

    Setting aside the demands – what are security leaders actually working on?

    A list of 'Top security topics among Info-Tech members' with accompanying bars, 'Security Strategy', 'Security Policies', 'Security Operations', 'Security Governance', and 'Security Incident Response'.

    Many organizations are still mastering the foundations of a mature cybersecurity program.

    This is a good idea!

    Most breaches are still due to gaps in foundational security, not lack of advanced controls.

    We know the priorities…

    But what are security leaders actually working on?

    A list of industries with accompanying bars representing their demand for security. The only industry with a significant positive percentage is 'Government'. Security projects included in annual plan relative to industry.

    One industry plainly stands out from the rest. Government organizations are proportionally much more active in security than other industries, and for good reason: they are common targets.

    Manufacturing and professional services are proportionally less interested in security. This is concerning, given the recent targeting of supply chain and personal data holders by ransomware gangs.

    5 Security Priorities for 2022 Logo for Info-Tech. Logo for ITRG.

    People

    1. Acquiring and Retaining Talent
      Create a good working environment for existing and potential employees. Invest time and effort into talent issues to avoid being understaffed.
    2. Securing a Remote Workforce
      Create a secure environment for users and help your people build safe habits while working remotely.

    Process

    1. Securing Digital Transformation
      Build in security from the start and check in frequently to create agile and secure user experiences.

    Technology

    1. Adopting Zero Trust
      Manage access of sensitive information based on the principle of least privilege.
    2. Protecting Against and Responding to Ransomware
      Put in your best effort to build defenses but also prepare for a breach and know how to recover.

    Main Influencing Factors

    COVID-19 Pandemic
    The pandemic has changed the way we interact with technology. Organizations are universally adapting their business and technology processes to fit the post-pandemic paradigm.
    Rampant Cybercrime Activity
    By nearly every conceivable metric, cybercrime is way up in the past two years. Cybercriminals smell blood and pose a more salient threat than before. Higher standards of cybersecurity capability are required to respond to this higher level of threat.
    Remote Work and Workforce Reallocation
    Talented IT staff across the globe enabled an extraordinarily fast shift to remote and distance work. We must now reckon with the security and human resourcing implications of this huge shift.

    Acquire and Retain Talent

    Priority 01

    Security talent was in short supply before the pandemic, and it's even worse now.

    Executive summary

    Background

    Cybersecurity talent has been in short supply for years, but this shortage has inflected upward since the pandemic.

    The Great Resignation contributed to the existing talent gap. The pandemic has changed how people work as well as how and where they choose work. More and more senior workers are retiring early or opting for remote working opportunities.

    The cost to acquire cybersecurity talent is huge, and the challenge doesn’t end there. Retaining top talent can be equally difficult.

    Current situation

    • A 2021 survey by ESG shows that 76% of security professional agree it’s difficult to recruit talent, and 57% said their organization is affected by this talent shortage.
    • (ISC)2 reports there are 2.72 million unfilled job openings and an increasing workforce gap (2021).

    2.72 million unfilled cybersecurity openings (Source: (ISC)2, 2021)

    IT leaders must do more to attract and retain talent in 2022

    • Over 70% of IT professionals are considering quitting their jobs (TalentLMS, 2021). Meanwhile, 51% of surveyed cybersecurity professionals report extreme burnout during the last 12 months and many of them have considered quitting because of it (VMWare, 2021).
    • Working remotely makes it easier for people to look elsewhere, lowering the barrier to leaving.
    • This is a big problem for security leaders, as cybersecurity talent is in very short supply. The cost of acquiring and retaining quality cybersecurity staff in 2022 is significant, and many organizations are unwilling or unable to pay the premium.
    • Top talent will demand flexible working conditions – even though remote work comes with security risk.
    • Most smart, talented new hires in 2022 are demanding to work remotely most of the time.
    Top reasons for resignations in 2021
    Burnout 30%
    Other remote opportunities 20%
    Lack of growth opportunities 20%
    Poor culture 20%
    Acquisition concerns 10%
    (Source: Survey of West Coast US cybersecurity professionals; TechBeacon, 2021)

    Talent will be 2022’s #1 strength and #1 weakness

    Staffing obstacles in 2022:

    “Attracting and retaining talent is always challenging. We don’t pay as well and my org wants staff in the office at least half of the time. Most young, smart, talented new hires want to work remotely 100 percent of the time.“

    “Trying to grow internal resources into security roles.”

    “Remote work expectations by employees and refusal by business to accommodate.”

    “Biggest obstacle: payscales that are out of touch with cybersecurity market.”

    “Request additional staff. Obtaining funding for additional position is most significant obstacle.”

    (Info-Tech Tech Security Priorities Survey 2022)
    Top obstacles in 2022:

    As you can see, respondents to our security priorities survey have strong feelings on the challenges of staffing a cybersecurity team.

    The growth of remote work means local talent can now be hired by anybody, vastly increasing your competition as an employer.

    Hiring local will get tougher – but so will hiring abroad. People who don’t want to relocate for a new job now have plenty of alternatives. Without a compelling remote work option, you will find non-local prospects unwilling to move for a new job.

    Lastly, many organizations are still reeling at the cost of experienced cybersecurity talent. Focused internal training and development will be the answer for many organizations.

    Recommended Actions

    Provide career development opportunities

    Many security professionals are dissatisfied with their unclear career development paths. To improve retention, organizations should provide their staff with opportunities and clear paths for career and skills advancement.

    Be open-minded when hiring

    To broaden the candidate pool, organizations should be open-minded when considering who to hire.

    • Enable remote work.
    • Do not fixate on certificates and years of experience; rather, be open to developing those who have the right interest and ability.
    • Consider using freelance workers.
    Facilitate work-life balance

    Many security professionals say they experience burnout. Promoting work-life balance in your organization can help retain critical skills.

    Create inclusive environment

    Hire a diverse team and create an inclusive environment where they can thrive.

    Talent acquisition and retention plan

    Use this template to explain the priorities you need your stakeholders to know about.

    Provide a brief value statement for the initiative.

    Address a top priority and a top obstacle with a plan to attract and retain top organizational and cybersecurity talent.

    Initiative Description:

    • Provide secure remote work capabilities for staff.
    • Work with HR to refine a hiring plan that addresses geographical and compensation gaps with cybersecurity and general staff.
    • Survey staff engagement to identify points of friction and remediate where needed.
    • Define a career path and growth plan for staff.
    Description must include what IT will undertake to complete the initiative.

    Primary Business Benefits:

    Arrow pointing down.
    Reduction in costs due to turnover and talent loss

    Other Expected Business Benefits:

    Arrow pointing up.
    Productivity due to good morale/ engagement
    Arrow pointing up.
    Improved corporate culture
    Align initiative benefits back to business benefits or benefits for the stakeholder groups that it impacts.

    Risks:

    • Big organizational and cultural changes
    • Increased attack surface of remote/hybrid workforce

    Related Info-Tech Research:

    Secure a Remote Workforce

    Priority 02

    Trends suggest remote work is here to stay. Addressing the risk of insecure endpoints can no longer be deferred.

    Executive summary

    Remote work poses unique challenges to cybersecurity teams. The personal home environment may introduce unauthorized people and unknown network vulnerabilities, and the organization loses nearly all power and influence over the daily cyber hygiene of its users.

    In addition, the software used for enabling remote work itself can be a target of cybersecurity criminals.

    Current situation

    • 70% of workers in technical services work from home.
    • Employees of larger firms and highly paid individuals are more likely to be working outside the office.
    • 80% of security and business leaders find that remote work has increased the risk of a breach.
    • (Source: StatCan, 2021)

    70% of tech workers work from home (Source: Statcan, 2021)

    Remote work demands new security solutions

    The security perimeter is finally gone

    The data is outside the datacenter.
    The users are outside the office.
    The endpoints are … anywhere and everywhere.

    Organizations that did not implement digital transformation changes following COVID-19 experience higher costs following a breach, likely because it is taking nearly two months longer, on average, to detect and contain a breach when more than 50% of staff are working remotely (IBM, 2021).

    In 2022 the cumulative risk of so many remote connections means we need to rethink how we secure the remote/hybrid workforce.

    Security
    • Distributed denial of service
    • DNS hijacking
    • Weak VPN protocols
    Identity
    • One-time verification allowing lateral movement
    Colorful tiles representing the surrounding security solutions. Network
    • Risk perimeter stops at corporate network edge
    • Split tunneling
    Authentication
    • Weak authentication
    • Weak password
    Access
    • Man-in-the-middle attack
    • Cross-site scripting
    • Session hijacking

    Recommended Actions

    Mature your identity management

    Compromised identity is the main vector to breaches in recent years. Stale accounts, contractor accounts, misalignment between HR and IT – the lack of foundational practices leads to headline-making breaches every week.
    Tighten up identity control to keep your organization out of the newspaper.

    Get a handle on your endpoints

    Work-from-home (WFH) often means unknown endpoints on unknown networks full of other unknown devices…and others in the home potentially using the workstation for non-work purposes. Gaining visibility into your endpoints can help to keep detection and resolution times short.

    Educate users

    Educate everyone on security best practices when working remotely:

    • Apply secure settings (not just defaults) to the home network.
    • Use strong passwords.
    • Identify suspicious email.
    Ease of use

    Many workers complain that the corporate technology solution makes it difficult to get their work done.

    Employees will take productivity over security if we force them to choose, so IT needs to listen to end users’ needs and provide a solution that is nimble and secure.

    Roadmap to securing remote/hybrid workforce

    Use this template to explain the priorities you need your stakeholders to know about.

    Provide a brief value statement for the initiative.

    The corporate network now extends to the internet – ensure your security plan has you covered.

    Initiative Description:

    • Reassess enterprise security strategy to include the WFH attack surface (especially endpoint visibility).
    • Ensure authentication requirements for remote workers are sufficient (e.g. MFA, strong passwords, hardware tokens for high-risk users/connections).
    • Assess the value of zero trust networking to minimize the blast radius in the case of a breach.
    • Perform penetration testing annually.
    Description must include what IT will undertake to complete the initiative.

    Primary Business Benefits:

    Arrow pointing down.


    Reduced cost of security incidents/reputational damage

    Other Expected Business Benefits:

    Arrow pointing up.
    Improved ability to attract and retain talent
    Arrow pointing up.
    Increased business adaptability
    Align initiative benefits back to business benefits or benefits for the stakeholder groups that it impacts.

    Risks:

    • Potential disruption to traditional working patterns
    • Cost of investing in WFH versus risk of BYOD

    Related Info-Tech Research:

    Secure Digital Transformation

    Priority 03

    Digital transformation could be a competitive advantage…or the cause of your next data breach.

    Executive summary

    Background

    Digital transformation is occurring at an ever-increasing rate these days. As Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella said early in the pandemic, “We’ve seen two years’ worth of digital transformation in two months.”

    We have heard similar stories from Info-Tech members who deployed rollouts that were scheduled to take months over a weekend instead.

    Microsoft’s own shift to rapidly expand its Teams product is a prime example of how quickly the digital landscape has changed. The global adaption to a digital world has largely been a success story, but rapid change comes with risk, and there is a parallel story of rampant cyberattacks like we have never seen before.

    Insight

    There is an adage that “slow is smooth, and smooth is fast” – the implication being that fast is sloppy. In 2022 we’ll see a pattern of organizations working to catch up their cybersecurity with the transformations we all made in 2020.

    $1.78 trillion expected in digital transformation investments (Source: World Economic Forum, 2021)

    An ounce of security prevention versus a pound of cure

    The journey of digital transformation is a risky one.

    Digital transformations often rely heavily on third-party cloud service providers, which increases exposure of corporate data.

    Further, adoption of new technology creates a new threat surface that must be assessed, mitigations implemented, and visibility established to measure performance.

    However, digital transformations are often run on slim budgets and without expert guidance.

    Survey respondents report as much: rushed deployments, increased cloud migration, and shadow IT are the top vulnerabilities reported by security leaders and executives.

    In a 2020 Ponemon survey, 82% of IT security and C-level executives reported experiencing at least one data breach directly resulting from a digital transformation they had undergone.

    Scope creep is inevitable on any large project like a digital transformation. A small security shortcut early in the project can have dire consequences when it grows to affect personal data and critical systems down the road.

    Recommended Actions

    Engage the business early and often

    Despite the risks, organizations engage in digital transformations because they also have huge business value.

    Security leaders should not be seeking to slow or stop digital transformations; rather, we should be engaging with the business early to get ahead of risks and enable successful transformation.

    Establish a vendor security program

    Data is moving out of datacenters and onto third-party environments. Without security requirements built into agreements, and clear visibility into vendor security capabilities, that data is a major source of risk.

    A robust vendor security program will create assurance early in the process and help to reinforce the responsibility of securing data with other parts of the organization.

    Build/revisit your security strategy

    The threat surface has changed since before your transformation. This is the right time to revisit or rebuild your security strategy to ensure that your control set is present throughout the new environment – and also a great opportunity to show how your current security investments are helping secure your new digital lines of business!

    Educate your key players

    Only 16% of security leaders and executives report alignment between security and business processes during digital transformation.

    If security is too low a priority, then key players in your transformation efforts are likely unaware of how security risks impact their own success. It will be incumbent upon the CISO to start that conversation.

    Securing digital transformation

    Use this template to explain the priorities you need your stakeholders to know about.

    Provide a brief value statement for the initiative.

    Ensure your investment in digital transformation is appropriately secured.

    Initiative Description:

    • Engage security with digital transformation and relevant governance structures (steering committees) to ensure security considerations are built into digital transformation planning.
    • Incorporate security stage gates in project management procedures.
    • Establish a vendor security assessment program.
    Description must include what IT will undertake to complete the initiative.

    Primary Business Benefits:

    Arrow pointing up.


    Increased likelihood of digital transformation success

    Other Expected Business Benefits:

    Arrow pointing up.
    Ability to make informed decisions for the field rep strategy
    Arrow pointing down.
    Reduced long-term cost of digital transformation
    Align initiative benefits back to business benefits or benefits for the stakeholder groups that it impacts.

    Risks:

    • Potential increased up front cost (reduced long-term cost)
    • Potential slowed implementation with security stage gates in project management

    Related Info-Tech Research:

    Adopt Zero Trust

    Priority 04

    Governments are recognizing the importance of zero trust strategies. So should your organization.

    Why now for zero trust?

    John Kindervag modernized the concept of zero trust back in 2010, and in the intervening years there has been enormous interest in cybersecurity circles, yet in 2022 only 30% of organizations report even beginning to roll out zero trust capabilities (Statista, 2022).

    Why such little action on a revolutionary and compelling model?

    Zero trust is not a technology; it is a principle. Zero trust adoption takes concerted planning, effort, and expense, for which the business value has been unclear throughout most of the last 10 years. However, several recent developments are changing that:

    • Securing technology has become very hard! The size, complexity, and attack surface of IT environments has grown significantly – especially since the pandemic.
    • Cyberattacks have become rampant as the cost to deploy harmful ransomware has become lower and the impact has become higher.
    • The shift away from on-premises datacenters and offices created an opening for zero trust investment, and zero trust technology is more mature than ever before.

    The time has come for zero trust adoption to begin in earnest.

    97% will maintain or increase zero trust budget (Source: Statista, 2022)

    Traditional perimeter security is not working

    Zero trust directly addresses the most prevalent attack vectors today

    A hybrid workforce using traditional VPN creates an environment where we are exposed to all the risks in the wild (unknown devices at any location on any network), but at a stripped-down security level that still provides the trust afforded to on-premises workers using known devices.

    What’s more, threats such as ransomware are known to exploit identity and remote access vulnerabilities before moving laterally within a network – vectors that are addressed directly by zero trust identity and networking. Ninety-three percent of surveyed zero trust adopters state that the benefits have matched or exceeded their expectations (iSMG, 2022).

    Top reasons for building a zero trust program in 2022

    (Source: iSMG, 2022)

    44%

    Enforce least privilege access to critical resources

    44%

    Reduce attacker ability to move laterally

    41%

    Reduce enterprise attack surface

    The business case for zero trust is clearer than ever

    Prior obstacles to Zero Trust are disappearing

    A major obstacle to zero trust adoption has been the sheer cost, along with the lack of business case for that investment. Two factors are changing that paradigm in 2022:

    The May 2021 US White House Executive Order for federal agencies to adopt zero trust architecture finally placed zero trust on the radar of many CEOs and board members, creating the business interest and willingness to consider investing in zero trust.

    In addition, the cost of adopting zero trust is quickly being surpassed by the cost of not adopting zero trust, as cyberattacks become rampant and successful zero trust deployments create a case study to support investment.

    Bar chart titled 'Cost to remediate a Ransomware attack' with bars representing the years '2021' and '2020'. 2021's cost sits around $1.8M while 2020's was only $750K The cost to remediate a ransomware attack more than doubled from 2020 to 2021. Widespread adoption of zero trust capabilities could keep that number from doubling again in 2022. (Source: Sophos, 2021)

    The cost of a data breach is on average $1.76 million less for organizations with mature zero trust deployments.

    That is, the cost of a data breach is 35% reduced compared to organizations without zero trust controls. (Source: IBM, 2021)

    Recommended Actions

    Start small

    Don’t put all your eggs in one basket by deploying zero trust in a wide swath. Rather, start as small as possible to allow for growing pains without creating business friction (or sinking your project altogether).

    Build a sensible roadmap

    Zero trust principles can be applied in a myriad of ways, so where should you start? Between identities, devices, networking, and data, decide on a use case to do pilot testing and then refine your approach.

    Beware too-good-to-be-true products

    Zero trust is a powerful buzzword, and vendors know it.

    Be skeptical and do your due diligence to ensure your new security partners in zero trust are delivering what you need.

    Zero trust roadmap

    Use this template to explain the priorities you need your stakeholders to know about.

    Provide a brief value statement for the initiative.

    Develop a practical roadmap that shows the business value of security investment.

    Initiative Description:

    • Define desired business and security outcomes from zero trust adoption.
    • Assess zero trust readiness.
    • Build roadmaps for zero trust:
      1. Identity
      2. Networking
      3. Devices
      4. Data
    Description must include what IT will undertake to complete the initiative.

    Primary Business Benefits:

    Arrow pointing up.


    Increased security posture and business agility

    Other Expected Business Benefits:

    Arrow pointing down.
    Reduced impact of security events
    Arrow pointing down.
    Reduced cost of managing complex control set
    Arrow pointing up.
    More secure business transformation (i.e. cloud/digital)
    Align initiative benefits back to business benefits or benefits for the stakeholder groups that it impacts.

    Risks:

    • Learning curve of implementation (start small and slow)
    • Transition from current control set to zero trust model

    Related Info-Tech Research:

    Protect Against and Respond to Ransomware

    Priority 05

    Ransomware is still the #1 threat to the safety of your data.

    Executive summary

    Background

    • Ransomware attacks have transformed in 2021 and show no sign of slowing in 2022. There is a new major security breach every week, despite organizations spending over $150 billion in a year on cybersecurity (Nasdaq, 2021).
    • Ransomware as a service (RaaS) is commonplace, and attackers are doubling down by holding encrypted data ransom and also demanding payment under threat to disclose exfiltrated data – and they are making good on their threats.
    • The global cost of ransomware is expected to rise to $265 billion by 2031 (Cybersecurity Ventures, 2021).
    • We expect to see an increase in ransomware incidents in 2022, both in severity and volume – multiple attacks and double extortion are now the norm.
    • High staff turnover increases risk because new employees are unfamiliar with security protocols.

    150% increase ransomware attacks in 2020 (Source: ENISA)

    This is a new golden age of ransomware

    What is the same in 2022

    Unbridled ransomware attacks make it seem like attackers must be using complex new techniques, but prevalent ransomware attack vectors are actually well understood.

    Nearly all modern variants are breaching victim systems in one of three ways:

    • Email phishing
    • Software vulnerabilities
    • RDP/Remote access compromise
    What is new in 2022
    The sophistication of victim targeting

    Victims often find themselves asking, “How did the attackers know to phish the most security-oblivious person in my staff?” Bad actors have refined their social engineering and phishing to exploit high-risk individuals, meaning your chain is only as strong as the weakest link.

    Ability of malware to evade detection

    Modern ransomware is getting better at bypassing anti-malware technology, for example, through creative techniques such as those seen in the MedusaLocker variant and in Ghost Control attacks.

    Effective anti-malware is still a must-have control, but a single layer of defense is no longer enough. Any organization that hopes to avoid paying a ransom must prepare to detect, respond, and recover from an attack.

    Many leaders still don’t know what a ransomware recovery would look like

    Do you know what it would take to recover from a ransomware incident?

    …and does your executive leadership know what it would take to recover?

    The organizations that are most likely to pay a ransom are unprepared for the reality of recovering their systems.

    If you have not done a tabletop or live exercise to simulate a true recovery effort, you may be exposed to more risk than you realize.

    Are your defenses sufficiently hardened against ransomware?

    Organizations with effective security prevention are often breached by ransomware – but they are prepared to contain, detect, and eradicate the infection.

    Ask yourself whether you have identified potential points of entry for ransomware. Assume that your security controls will fail.

    How well are your security controls layered, and how difficult would it be for an attacker to move east/west within your systems?

    Recommended Actions

    Be prepared for a breach

    There is no guarantee that an organization will not fall victim to ransomware, so instead of putting all their effort into prevention, organizations should also put effort into planning to respond to a breach.

    Security awareness training/phishing detection

    Phishing continues to be the main point of entry for ransomware. Investing in phishing awareness and detection among your end users may be the most impactful countermeasure you can implement.

    Zero trust adoption

    Always verify at every step of interaction, even when access is requested by internal users. Manage access of sensitive information based on the principle of least privilege access.

    Encrypt and back up your data

    Encrypt your data so that even if there is a breach, the attackers don’t have a copy of your data. Also, keep regular backups of data at a separate location so that you still have data to work with after a breach occurs.

    You never want to pay a ransom. Being prepared to deal with an incident is your best chance to avoid paying!

    Prevent and respond to ransomware

    Use this template to explain the priorities you need your stakeholders to know about.

    Provide a brief value statement for the initiative.

    Determine your current readiness, response plan, and projects to close gaps.

    Initiative Description:

    • Execute a systematic assessment of your current security and ransomware recovery capabilities.
    • Perform tabletop activities and live recoveries to test data recovery capabilities.
    • Train staff to detect suspicious communications and protect their identities.
    Description must include what IT will undertake to complete the initiative.

    Primary Business Benefits:

    Arrow pointing up.


    Improved productivity and brand protection

    Other Expected Business Benefits:

    Arrow pointing down.
    Reduced downtime and disruption
    Arrow pointing down.
    Reduced cost due to incidents (ransom payments, remediation)
    Align initiative benefits back to business benefits or benefits for the stakeholder groups that it impacts.

    Risks:

    • Friction with existing staff

    Related Info-Tech Research:

    Deepfakes: Dark-horse threat for 2022

    Deepfake video

    How long has it been since you’ve gone a full workday without having a videoconference with someone?

    We have become inherently trustful that the face we see on the screen is real, but the technology required to falsify that video is widely available and runs on commercially available hardware, ushering in a genuinely post-truth online era.

    Criminals can use deepfakes to enhance social engineering, to spread misinformation, and to commit fraud and blackmail.

    Deepfake audio

    Many financial institutions have recently deployed voiceprint authentication. TD describes its VoicePrint as “voice recognition technology that allows us to use your voiceprint – as unique to you as your fingerprint – to validate your identity” over the phone.

    However, hackers have been defeating voice recognition for years already. There is ripe potential for voice fakes to fool both modern voice recognition technology and the accounts payable staff.

    Bibliography

    “2021 Ransomware Statistics, Data, & Trends.” PurpleSec, 2021. Web.

    Bayern, Macy. “Why 60% of IT security pros want to quit their jobs right now.” TechRepublic, 10 Oct. 2018. Web.

    Bresnahan, Ethan. “How Digital Transformation Impacts IT And Cyber Risk Programs.” CyberSaint Security, 25 Feb. 2021. Web.

    Clancy, Molly. “The True Cost of Ransomware.” Backblaze, 9 Sept. 2021.Web.

    “Cost of a Data Breach Report 2021.” IBM, 2021. Web.

    Cybersecurity Ventures. “Global Ransomware Damage Costs To Exceed $265 Billion By 2031.” Newswires, 4 June 2021. Web.

    “Digital Transformation & Cyber Risk: What You Need to Know to Stay Safe.” Ponemon Institute, June 2020. Web.

    “Global Incident Response Threat Report: Manipulating Reality.” VMware, 2021.

    Granger, Diana. “Karmen Ransomware Variant Introduced by Russian Hacker.” Recorded Future, 18 April 2017. Web.

    “Is adopting a zero trust model a priority for your organization?” Statista, 2022. Web.

    “(ISC)2 Cybersecurity Workforce Study, 2021: A Resilient Cybersecurity Profession Charts the Path Forward.” (ISC)2, 2021. Web.

    Kobialka, Dan. “What Are the Top Zero Trust Strategies for 2022?” MSSP Alert, 10 Feb. 2022. Web.

    Kost, Edward. “What is Ransomware as a Service (RaaS)? The Dangerous Threat to World Security.” UpGuard, 1 Nov. 2021. Web.

    Lella, Ifigeneia, et al., editors. “ENISA Threat Landscape 2021.” ENISA, Oct. 2021. Web.

    Mello, John P., Jr. “700K more cybersecurity workers, but still a talent shortage.” TechBeacon, 7 Dec. 2021. Web.

    Naraine, Ryan. “Is the ‘Great Resignation’ Impacting Cybersecurity?” SecurityWeek, 11 Jan. 2022. Web.

    Oltsik, Jon. “ESG Research Report: The Life and Times of Cybersecurity Professionals 2021 Volume V.” Enterprise Security Group, 28 July 2021. Web.

    Osborne, Charlie. “Ransomware as a service: Negotiators are now in high demand.” ZDNet, 8 July 2021. Web.

    Osborne, Charlie. “Ransomware in 2022: We’re all screwed.” ZDNet, 22 Dec. 2021. Web.

    “Retaining Tech Employees in the Era of The Great Resignation.” TalentLMS, 19 Oct. 2021. Web.

    Rubin, Andrew. “Ransomware Is the Greatest Business Threat in 2022.” Nasdaq, 7 Dec. 2021. Web.

    Samartsev, Dmitry, and Daniel Dobrygowski. “5 ways Digital Transformation Officers can make cybersecurity a top priority.“ World Economic Forum, 15 Sept. 2021. Web.

    Seymour, John, and Azeem Aqil. “Your Voice is My Passport.” Presented at black hat USA 2018.

    Solomon, Howard. “Ransomware attacks will be more targeted in 2022: Trend Micro.” IT World Canada, 6 Jan. 2022. Web.

    “The State of Ransomware 2021.” Sophos, April 2021. Web.

    Tarun, Renee. “How The Great Resignation Could Benefit Cybersecurity.” Forbes Technology Council, Forbes, 21 Dec. 2021. Web.

    “TD VoicePrint.” TD Bank, n.d. Web.

    “Working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic, April 202 to June 2021.” Statistics Canada, 4 Aug. 2021. Web.

    “Zero Trust Strategies for 2022.” iSMG, Palo Alto Networks, and Optiv, 28 Jan. 2022. Web.

    Drive Business Value With Off-the-Shelf AI

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}205|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Business Intelligence Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /business-intelligence-strategy
    • Understanding the impact of the machine learning/AI component that is built into most of the enterprise products and tools and its role in the implementation of the solution.
    • Understanding the most important aspects that the organization needs to consider while planning the implementation of the AI-powered product.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Organizations are faced with multiple challenges trying to adopt AI solutions. Challenges include data issues, ethics and compliance considerations, business process challenges, and misaligned leadership goals.
    • When choosing the right product to meet business needs, organizations need to know what questions to ask vendors to ensure they fully understand the implications of buying an AI/ML product.
    • To guarantee the success of your off-the-shelf AI implementation and ensure it delivers value, you must start with a clear definition of the business case and an understanding of your data.

    Impact and Result

    To guarantee success of the off-the-shelf AI implementation and deliver value, in addition to formulating a clear definition of the business case and understanding of data, organizations should also:

    • Know what questions to ask vendors while evaluating AI-powered products.
    • Measure the impact of the project on business and IT processes.

    Drive Business Value With Off-the-Shelf AI Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Drive Business Value With Off-the-Shelf AI Deck – A step-by-step approach that will help guarantee the success of your Off-the-Shelf AI implementation and ensure it delivers business value

    Use this practical and actionable framework that will guide you through the planning of your Off-the-Shelf AI product implementation.

    • Drive Business Value With Off-the-Shelf AI Storyboard

    2. Off-the-Shelf AI Analysis – A tool that will guide the analysis and planning of the implementation

    Use this analysis tool to ensure the success of the implementation.

    • Off-the-Shelf AI Analysis

    Infographic

    Further reading

    Drive Business Value With Off-the-Shelf AI

    A practical guide to ensure return on your Off-the-Shelf AI investment

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge
    • Understanding the impact of the machine learning/AI component that is built into most of the enterprise products and tools and its role in the implementation of the solution.
    • What are the most important aspects that organizations needs to consider while planning the implementation of the AI-powered product?
    Common Obstacles
    • Organizations are faced with multiple challenges trying to adopt an AI solution. Challenges include data issues, ethics and compliance considerations, business process challenges, and misaligned leadership goals.
    • When choosing the right product to meet business needs, organizations need to know what questions to ask vendors to ensure they fully understand the implications of buying an AI/ML product.
    Info-Tech’s Approach

    Info-Tech’s approach includes a framework that will guide organizations through the process of the Off-the-Shelf AI product selection.

    To guarantee success of the Off-the-Shelf AI implementation and deliver value, organization should start with clear definition of the business case and an understanding of data.

    Other steps include:

    • Knowing what questions to ask vendors to evaluate AI-powered products.
    • Measuring the impact of the project on your business and IT processes.
    • Assessing impact on the organization and ensure team readiness.

    Info-Tech Insight

    To guarantee the success of your Off-the-Shelf AI implementation and ensure it delivers value, you must start with a clear definition of the business case and an understanding of your data.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Getting value out of AI and machine learning investments

    92.1%

    of companies say they are achieving returns on their data and AI investments

    91.7%

    said they were increasing investments in data and AI

    26.0%

    of companies have AI systems in widespread production
    However, CIO Magazine identified nine main hurdles to AI adoption based on the survey results:
    • Data issues
    • Business process challenges
    • Implementation challenges and skill shortages
    • Costs of tools and development
    • Misaligned leadership goals
    • Measuring and proving business value
    • Legal and regulatory risks
    • Cybersecurity
    • Ethics
    • (Source: CIO, 2019)
    “Data and AI initiatives are becoming well established, investments are paying off, and companies are getting more economic value from AI.” (Source: NewVantage, 2022.)

    67% of companies are currently using machine learning, and 97% are using or planning to use it in the next year.” (Source: Deloitte, 2020)

    AI vs. ML

    Machine learning systems learn from experience and without explicit instructions. They learn patterns from data then analyze and make predictions based on past behavior and the patterns learned.

    Artificial intelligence is a combination of technologies and can include machine learning. AI systems perform tasks mimicking human intelligence such as learning from experience and problem solving. Most importantly, AI is making its own decisions without human intervention.

    The AI system can make assumptions, test these assumptions, and learn from the results.

    (Level of decision making required increases from left to right)
    Statistical Reasoning
    Infer relationships between variables

    Statistical models are designed to find relationships between variables and the significance of those relationships.

    Machine Learning:
    Making accurate predictions

    Machine learning is a subset of AI that discovers patterns from data without being explicitly programmed to do so.

    Artificial Intelligence
    Dynamic adaptation to novelty

    AI systems choose the optimal combination of methods to solve a problem. They make assumptions, reassess the model, and reevaluate the data.

    “Machine learning is the study of computer algorithms that improve automatically through experience.” (Tom Mitchell, 1997)

    “At its simplest form, artificial intelligence is a field, which combines computer science and robust datasets, to enable problem-solving.” (IBM, “What is artificial intelligence?”)

    Types of Off-the-Shelf AI products and solutions

    ML/AI-Powered Products Off-the-Shelf Pre-built and Pre-trained AI/ML Models
    • AI/ML capabilities built into the product and might require training as part of the implementation.
    • Off-the-Shelf ML/AI Models, pre-built, pre-trained, and pre-optimized for a particular task. For example, language models or image recognition models that can be used to speed up and simplify ML/AI systems development.
    Examples of OTS tools/products: Examples of OTS models:

    The data inputs for these models are defined, the developer has to conform to the provided schema, and the data outputs are usually fixed due to the particular task the OTS model is built to solve.

    Insight summary

    Overarching insight:

    To guarantee the success of your Off-the-Shelf AI implementation and ensure it delivers value, you must start with a clear definition of the business case and an understanding of your data.

    Business Goals

    Question the value that AI adds to the tool you are evaluating. Don’t go after the tool simply because it has an AI label attached to it. AI/ML capabilities might add little value but increase implementation complexity. Define the problem you are solving and document business requirements for the tool or a model.

    Data

    Know your data. Determine data requirements to:

    • Train the model during the implementation and development.
    • Run the model in production.

    People/Skills

    Define the skills required for the implementation and assemble the team that will support the project from requirements to deployment and support, through its entire lifecycle. Don’t forget about production support and maintenance.

    Choosing an AI-Powered Tool

    No need to reinvent the wheel and build a product you can buy, but be prepared to work around tool limitations, and make sure you understand the data and the model the tool is built on.

    Choosing an AI/ML Model

    Using Off-the-Shelf-AI models enables an agile approach to system development. Faster POC and validation of ideas and approaches, but the model might not be customizable for your requirements.

    Guaranteeing Off-the-Shelf AI Implementation Success

    Info-Tech Insight

    To guarantee the success of your Off-the-Shelf AI implementation and ensure it delivers value, you must start with a clear definition of the business case and an understanding of your data.

    Why do you need AI in your toolset?
    Business Goals

    Clearly defined problem statement and business requirements for the tool or a model will help you select the right solution that will deliver business value even if it does not have all the latest bells and whistles.

    Small chevron pointing right.
    Do you know the data required for implementation?
    Data

    Expected business outcome defines data requirements for implementation. Do you have the right data required to train and run the model?

    Large chevron pointing right.
    Is your organization ready for AI?
    People/Team/ Skills

    New skills and expertise are required through all phases of the implementation: design, build, deployment, support, and maintenance, as well as post-production support, scaling, and adoption.

    Data Architecture/ Infrastructure

    New tool or model will impact your cloud and integration strategy. It will have to integrate with the existing infrastructure, in the cloud or on prem.

    Large chevron pointing right.
    What questions do you need to ask when choosing the solution?
    Product/ Tool or Model Selection

    Do you know what model powers the AI tool? What data was used to train the tool and what data is required to run it? Ask the right questions.

    Small chevron pointing right.
    Are you measuring impact on your processes?
    Business and IT Processes

    Business processes need to be defined or updated to incorporate the output of the tool back into the business processes to deliver value.

    IT governance and support processes need to accommodate the new AI-powered tool.

    Small chevron pointing right.
    Realize and measure business value of your AI investment
    Value

    Do you have a clear understanding of the value that AI will bring to your organization?Optimization?Increased revenue?Operational efficiency?

    Introduction of Off-the-Shelf AI Requires a Strategic Approach

    Business Goals and Value Data People/Team/ Skills Infrastructure Business and IT Processes
    AI/ML–powered tools
    • Define a business problem that can be solved with either an AI-powered tool or an AI/ML pre-built model that will become part of the solution.
    • Define expectations and assumptions around the value that AI can bring.
    • Document business requirements for the tool or model.
    • Define the scope for a prototype or POC.
    • Define data requirements.
    • Define data required for implementation.
    • Determine if the required data can be acquired or captured/generated.
    • Document internal and external sources of data.
    • Validate data quality (define requirements and criteria for data quality).
    • Define where and how the data is stored and will be stored. Does it have to be moved or consolidated?
    • Define all stakeholders involved in the implementation and support.
    • Define skills and expertise required through all phases of the implementation: design, build, deployment, support, and maintenance.
    • Define skills and expertise required to grow AI practice and achieve the next level of adoption, scaling, and development of the tool or model POC.
    • Define infrastructure requirements for either Cloud, Software-as-a-Service, or on-prem deployment of a tool or model.
    • Define how the tool is integrated with existing systems and into existing infrastructure.
    • Determine the cost to deploy and run the tool/model.
    • Define processes that need to be updated to accommodate new functionality.
    • Define how the outcome of the tool or a model (e.g. predictions) are incorporated back into the business processes.
    • Define new business and IT processes that need to be defined around the tool (e.g. chatbot maintenance; analysis of the data generated by the tool).
    Off-the-shelf AI/ML pre-built models
    • Define the business metrics and KPIs to measure success of the implementation against.
    • Determine if there are requirements for a specific data format required for the tool or a model.
    • Determine if there is a need to classify/label the data (supervised learning).
    • Define privacy and security requirements.
    • Define requirements for employee training. This can be vendor training for a tool or platform training in the case of a pre-built model or service.
    • Define if ML/AI expertise is required.
    • Is the organization ready for ML/AI? Conduct an AI literacy survey and understand team’s concerns, fears, and misconceptions and address them.
    • Define requirements for:
      • Data migration.
      • Security.
      • AI/ML pipeline deployment and maintenance.
    • Define requirements for operation and maintenance of the tool or model.
    • Confirm infrastructure readiness.
    • How AI and its output will be used across the organization.

    Define Business Goals and Objectives

    Why do you need AI in your toolset? What value will AI deliver? Have a clear understanding of business benefits and the value AI delivers through the tool.

    • Define a business problem that can be solved with either an AI-powered tool or AI/ML pre-built model.
    • Define expectations and assumptions around the value that AI can bring.
    • Document business requirements for a tool or model.
    • Start with the POC or a prototype to test assumptions, architecture, and components of the solution.
    • Define business metrics and KPIs to measure success of the implementation.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Question the value that AI adds to the tool you are evaluating. Don’t go after the tool simply because it has an AI label attached to it. AI/ML capabilities might add little value but increase implementation complexity. Define the problem you are solving and document business requirements for the tool or a model.

    Venn diagram of 'Applied Artificial Intelligence (AAI)' with a larger circle at the top, 'Machine Learning (ML)', and three smaller ovals intersecting, 'Computer Vision', 'Natural Language Processing (NLP)', and 'Robotic Process Automation (RPA)'.

    AAI solutions and technologies are helping organizations make faster decisions and predict future outcomes such as:

    • Business process automation
    • Intelligent integration
    • Intelligent insights
    • Operational efficiency improvement
    • Increase revenue
    • Improvement of existing products and services
    • Product and process innovation

    1. Use Info-Tech’s Off-the-Shelf AI Analysis Tool to define business drivers and document business requirements

    2-3 hours
    Screenshot of the Off-the-Shelf AI Analysis Tool's Business Drivers tab, a table with columns 'AI/ML Tool or Model', 'Use Case', 'Business problem / goal for AI/ML use case', 'Description', 'Business Owner (Primary Stakeholder)', 'Priority', 'Stakeholder Groups Impacted', 'Requirements Defined? Yes/No', 'Related Data Domains', and 'KPIs'. Use the Business Drivers tab to document:
    • Business objectives of the initiative that might drive the AI/ML use case.
    • The business owner or primary stakeholder who will help to define business value and requirements.
    • All stakeholders who will be involved or impacted.
    • KPIs that will be used to assess the success of the POC.
    • Data required for the implementation.
    • Use the Business Requirements tab to document high-level requirements for a tool or model.
    • These requirements will be used while defining criteria for a tool selection and to validate if the tool or model meets your business goals.
    • You can use either traditional BRD format or a user story to document requirements.
    Screenshot of the Off-the-Shelf AI Analysis Tool's Business Requirements tab, a table with columns 'Requirement ID', 'Requirement Description / user story', 'Requirement Category', 'Stakeholder / User Role', 'Requirement Priority', and 'Complexity (point estimates)'.

    Download the Off-the-Shelf AI Analysis Tool

    1. Define business drivers and document business requirements

    Input

    • Strategic plan of the organization
    • Data strategy that defines target data capabilities required to support enterprise strategic goals
    • Roadmap of business and data initiatives to support target state of data capabilities

    Output

    • Prioritized list of business use cases where an AI-powered tool or AI/ML can deliver business value
    • List of high-level requirements for the selected use case

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/Flip Charts
    • Off-the-Shelf-AI Analysis Tool, “Business Drivers” and “Business Requirements” tabs

    Participants

    • CIO
    • Senior business and IT stakeholders
    • Data owner(s)
    • Data steward(s)
    • Enterprise Architect
    • Data Architect
    • Data scientist/Data analyst

    Understand data required for implementation

    Do you have the right data to implement and run the AI-powered tool or AI/ML model?

    Info-Tech Insight

    Know your data. Determine data requirements to:

    • Train the model during the implementation and development, and
    • Run the model in production
    AvailabilityArrow pointing rightQualityArrow pointing rightPreparationArrow pointing rightBias, Privacy, SecurityArrow pointing rightData Architecture
    • Define what data is required for implementation, e.g. customer data, financial data, product sentiment.
    • If the data is not available, can it be acquired, gathered, or generated?
    • Define the volume of data required for implementation and production.
    • If the model has to be trained, do you have the data required for training (e.g. dictionary of terms)? Can it be created, gathered, or acquired?
    • Document internal and external sources of data.
    • Evaluate data quality for all data sources based on the requirements and criteria defined in the previous step.
    • For datasets with data quality issues, determine if the data issues can be resolved (e.g. missing values are inferred). If not, can this issue be resolved by using other data sources?
    • Engage a Data Governance organization to address any data quality concerns.
    • Determine if there are requirements for a specific data format required for the tool or model.
    • Determine if there is a need to classify/label or tag the data. What are the metadata requirements?
    • Define whether or not the implementation team needs to aggregate or transform the data before it can be used.
    • Define privacy requirements, as these might affect the availability of the data for ML/AI.
    • Define data bias concerns and considerations. Do you have datasheets for datasets that will be used in this project? What datasets cannot be used to prevent bias?
    • What are the security requirements and how will they affect data storage, product selection, and infrastructure requirements for the tool and overall solution?
    • Define where and how the data is currently stored and will be stored.
    • Does it have to be migrated or consolidated? Does it have to be moved to the cloud or between systems?
    • Is a data lake or data warehouse a requirement for this implementation as defined by the solution architecture?

    2. Use Info-Tech’s Off-the-Shelf AI Analysis Tool to document data requirements

    2-3 hours

    Use the Data tab to document the following for each data source or dataset:
    • Data Domain – e.g. Customer data
    • Data Concept – e.g. Customer
    • Data Internally Accessible – Identify datasets that are required for the implementation even if the data might not be available internally. Work on determining if the data ca be acquired externally or collected internally.
    • Source System – define the primary source system for the data, e.g. Salesforce
    • Target System (if applicable) – Define if the data needs to be migrated/transferred. For example, you might use a datalake or data warehouse for the AI/ML solution or migrate data to the cloud.
    • Classification/Taxonomy/Ontology
    • Data Steward
    • Data Owner
    • Data Quality – Data quality indicator
    • Refresh Rate – Frequency of data refresh. Indicate if the data can be accessed in real time or near-real time

    Screenshot of the Off-the-Shelf AI Analysis Tool's Data tab, a spreadsheet table with the columns listed to the left and below.
    • Retention – Retention policy requirements
    • Compliance Requirements – Define if data has to comply with any of the regulatory requirements, e.g. GDPR
    • Privacy, Bias, and Ethics Considerations – Privacy Act, PIPEDA, etc. Identify if the dataset contains sensitive information that should be excluded from the model, such as gender, age, race etc. Indicate fairness metrics, if applicable.

    Download the Off-the-Shelf AI Analysis Tool

    2. Document data requirements

    Input

    • Documented business use cases from Step 1.
    • High-level business requirements from Step 1.
    • Data catalog, data dictionaries, business glossary
    • Data flows and data architecture

    Output

    • High-level data requirements
    • List of data sources and datasets that can be used for the implementation
    • Datasets that need to be collected or acquired externally

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/Flip Charts
    • Off-the-Shelf AI Analysis Tool, “Data” tab

    Participants

    • CIO
    • Business and IT stakeholders
    • Data owner(s)
    • Data steward(s)
    • Enterprise Architect
    • Data Architect
    • Data scientist/Data analyst

    Is Your Organization Ready for AI?

    Assess organizational readiness and define stakeholders impacted by the implementation. Build the team with the right skillset to drive the solution.

    • Implementation of the AI/ML-powered Off-the-Shelf Tool or an AI/ML model will require a team with a combination of skills through all phases of the project, from design of the solution to build, production, deployment, and support.
    • Document the skillsets required and determine the skills gap. Before you start hiring, depending on the role, you might find talent within the organization to join the implementation team with little to no training.
    • AI/ML resources that may be needed on your team driving AI implementation (you might consider bringing part-time resources to fill the gaps or use vendor developers) are:
      • Data Scientist
      • Machine Learning Engineer
      • Data Engineer
      • Data Architect
      • AI/ML Ops engineer
    • Define training requirements. Consider vendor training for a tool or platform.
    • Plan for future scaling and the growing of the solution and AI practice. Assess the need to apply AI in other business areas. Work with the team to analyze use cases and prioritize AI initiatives. As the practice grows, grow your team expertise.
    • Identify the stakeholders who will be affected by the AI implementation.
    • Work with them to understand and address any concerns, fears, or misconceptions around the role of AI and the consequences of bringing AI into the organization.
    • Develop a communication and change management plan to educate everyone within the organization on the application and benefits of using AI and machine learning.

    Info-Tech Insight:

    Define the skills required for the implementation and assemble the team that will support the project through its entire lifecycle. Don’t forget about production, support, and maintenance.

    3. Build your implementation team

    1-2 hours

    Input: Solution conceptual design, Current resource availability

    Output: Roles required for the implementation of the solution, Resources gap analysis, Training and hiring plan

    Materials: Whiteboard/Flip charts, Off-the-Shelf AI Analysis Tool, “People and Team” tab

    Participants: Project lead, HR, Enterprise Architect

    1. Review your solution conceptual design and define implementation team roles.
    2. Document requirements for each role.
    3. Review current org chart and job descriptions and identify skillset gaps. Draft an action plan to fill in the roles.
    4. Use Info-Tech’s Off-the-Shelf AI Analysis Tool's People and Team tab to document team roles for the entire implementation, including design, build/implement, deployment, support and maintenance, and future development.

    Screenshot of the Off-the-Shelf AI Analysis Tool's People and Team tab, a table with columns 'Design', 'Implement', 'Deployment', 'Support and Maintenance', and 'Future Development'.

    Download the Off-the-Shelf AI Analysis Tool

    Cloud, SaaS or On Prem – what are my options and what is the impact?

    Depending on the architecture of the solution, define the impact on the current infrastructure, including system integration, AI/ML pipeline deployment, maintenance, and data storage

    • Data Architecture: use the current data architecture to design the architecture for an AI-powered solution. Assess changes to the data architecture with the introduction of a new tool to make sure it is scalable enough to support the change.
    • Define infrastructure requirements for either Cloud, Software-as-a-Service, or on-prem deployment of a tool or model.
    • Define how the tool will be integrated with existing systems and into existing infrastructure.
    • Define requirements for:
      • Data migration and data storage
      • Security
      • AI/ML pipeline deployment, production monitoring, and maintenance
    • Define requirements for operation and maintenance of the tool or model.
    • Work with your infrastructure architect and vendor to determine the cost of deploying and running the tool/model.
    • Make a decision on the preferred architecture of the system and confirm infrastructure readiness.

    Download the Create an Architecture for AI blueprint

    4. Use Info-Tech’s Off-the-Shelf AI Analysis Tool to document infrastructure decisions

    2-3 hours

    Input: Solution conceptual design

    Output: Infrastructure requirements, Infrastructure readiness assessment

    Materials: Whiteboard/Flip charts, Off-the-Shelf AI Analysis Tool, “Infrastructure” tab

    Participants: Infrastructure Architect, Solution Architect, Enterprise Architect, Data Architect, ML/AI Ops Engineer

    1. Work with Infrastructure, Data, Solution, and Enterprise Architects to define your conceptual solution architecture.
    2. Define integration and storage requirements.
    3. Document security requirements for the solution in general and the data specifically.
    4. Define MLOps requirements and tools required for ML/AI pipeline deployment and production monitoring.
    5. Use Info-Tech’s Off-the-Shelf AI Analysis Tool's Infrastructure tab to document requirements and decisions around Data and Infrastructure Architecture.

    Screenshot of the Off-the-Shelf AI Analysis Tool's Infrastructure tab, a table with columns 'Cloud, SaaS or On-Prem', 'Data Migration Requirements', 'Data Storage Requirements', 'Security Requirements', 'Integrations Required', and 'AI/ML Pipeline Deployment and Maintenance Requirements'.

    Download the Off-the-Shelf AI Analysis Tool

    What questions do you need to ask vendors when choosing the solution?

    Take advantage of Info-Tech’s Rapid Application Selection Framework (RASF) to guide tool selection, but ask vendors the right questions to understand implications of having AI/ML built into the tool or a model

    Data Model Implementation and Integration Deployment Security and Compliance
    • What data (attributes) were used to train the model?
    • Do you have datasheets for the data used?
    • How was data bias mitigated?
    • What are the data labeling/classification requirements for training the model?
    • What data is required for production? E.g. volume; type of data, etc.
    • Were there any open-source libraries used in the model? If yes, how were vulnerabilities and security concerns addressed?
    • What algorithms are implemented in the tool/model?
    • Can model parameters be configured?
    • What is model accuracy?
    • Level of customization required for the implementation to meet our requirements.
    • Does the model require training? If yes, can you provide details? Can you estimate the effort required?
    • Integration capabilities and requirements.
    • Data migration requirements for tool operation and development.
    • Administrator console – is this functionality available?
    • Implementation timeframe.
    • Is the model or tool deployable on premises or in the cloud? Do you support hybrid cloud and multi-cloud deployment?
    • What cloud platforms are your product/model integrated with (AWS, Azure, GCP)?
    • What are the infrastructure requirements?
    • Is the model containerized/ scalable?
    • What product support and product updates are available?
    • Regulatory compliance (GDPR, PIPEDA, HIPAA, PCI DSS, CCPA, SOX, etc.)?
    • How are data security risks addressed?

    Use Info-Tech’s Off-the-Shelf AI Analysis Tool, “Vendor Questionnaire” tab to track vendor responses to these questions.

    Are you measuring impact on your processes?

    Make sure that you understand the impact of the new technology on the existing business and IT processes.

    And make sure your business processes are ready to take advantage of the benefits and new capabilities enabled by AI/ML.

    Process automation, optimization, and improvement enabled by the technology and AI/ML-powered tools allow organizations to reduce manual work, streamline existing business processes, improve customer satisfaction, and get critical insights to assist decision making.

    To take full advantage of the benefits and new capabilities enabled by the technology, make sure that business and IT processes reflect these changes:

    • Processes that need to be updated.
    • How the outcome of the tool or a model (e.g. predictions) is incorporated into the existing business processes and the processes that will monitor the accuracy of the outcome and monitor performance of the tool or model.
    • New business and IT processes that need to be defined for the tool (e.g. chatbot maintenance, analysis of the data generated by the tool, etc.).

    5. Document the Impact on Business and IT Processes

    2-3 hours

    Input: Solution design, Existing business and IT processes

    Output: Documented updates to the existing processes, Documented new business and IT processes

    Materials: Whiteboard/Flip charts, Off-the-Shelf AI Analysis Tool, “Business and IT Processes” tab

    Participants: Project lead, Business stakeholders, Business analyst

    1. Review current business processes affected by the implementation of the AI/ML- powered tool or model. Define the changes that need to be made. The changes might include simplification of the process due to automation of some of the steps. Some processes will need to be redesigned and some processes might become obsolete.
    2. Document high-level steps for any new processes that need to be defined around the AI/ML-powered tool. An example of such a process would be defining new IT and business processes to support a new chatbot.
    3. Use Info-Tech’s Off-the-Shelf AI Analysis Tool's Business and IT Processes tab, to document process changes.

    Screenshot of the Off-the-Shelf AI Analysis Tool's Business and IT Processes tab, a table with columns 'Existing business process affected', 'New business process', 'Stakeholders involved', 'Changes to be made', and 'New Process High-Level Steps'.

    Download the Off-the-Shelf AI Analysis Tool

    AI-powered Tools – Considerations

    PROS:
    • Enhanced functionality, allows the power of AI without specialized skills (e.g., Mathematica – recognizing patterns in data).
    • Might be a cheaper option compared to building a solution in-house (chatbot, for ex.).

    Info-Tech Insight:

    No need to reinvent the wheel and build the product you can buy, but be prepared to work around tool limitations, and make sure you understand the data and the model the tool is built on.

    CONS:
    • Dependency on the service provider.
    • The tool might not meet all the business requirements without customization.
    • Bias can be built into the tool:
      • Work with the vendor to understand what data was used to train the model.
      • From the perspective of ethics and bias, learn what model is implemented in the tool and what data attributes the model uses.

    Pre-built/pre-trained models – what to keep in mind when choosing

    PROS:
    • Lower cost and less time to development compared to creating and training models from scratch (e.g. using image recognition models or pre-trained language models like BERT).
    • If the pre-trained and optimized model perfectly fits your needs, the model accuracy might be high and sufficient for your scenario.
    • Off-the-Shelf AI models are useful for creating prototypes or POCs, for testing a hypothesis, and for validating ideas and requirements.
    • Usage of Off-the-Shelf models shortens the development cycle and reduces investment risks.
    • Language models are particularly useful if you don’t have data to train your own model (a “small data” scenario).
    • Infrastructure and model training cost reduction.
    CONS:
    • Might be a challenge to deploy and maintain the system in production.
    • Lack of flexibility: you might not be able to configure input or output parameters to your requirements. For example, a pre-built sentiment analysis model might return four values (“positive,” “negative,” “neutral,” and “mixed”), but your solution will require only two or three values.
    • Might be a challenge to comply with security and privacy requirements.
    • Compliance with privacy and fairness requirements and considerations: what data was used to pretrain the model?
    • If open-source libraries were used to create the model, how will vulnerabilities, risks, and security concerns be addressed?

    Info-Tech Insight:

    Using Off-the-Shelf AI models enables an agile approach to system development – faster POC and validation of ideas and approaches, but the model might not be customizable for your requirements.

    Metrics

    Metrics and KPIs for this project will depend on the business goals and objectives that you will identify in Step 1 of the tool selection process.

    Metrics might include:

    • Reduction of time spent on a specific business process. If the tool is used to automate certain steps of a business process, this metric will measure how much time was saved, in minutes/hours, compared to the process time before the introduction of the tool.
    • Accuracy of prediction. This metric would measure the accuracy of estimations or predictions compared to the same estimations done before the implementation of the tool. It can be measured by generating the same prediction or estimation using the AI-powered tool or using any methods used before the introduction of the tool and comparing the results.
    • Accuracy of the search results. If the AI-powered tool is a search engine, compare a) how much time it would take a user to find an article or a piece of content they were searching for using new tool vs. previous techniques, b) how many steps it took the user to locate the required article in the search results, and c) the location of the correct piece of content in the search result list (at the top of the search result list or on the tenth page).
    • Time spent on manual tasks and activities. This metric will measure how much time, in minutes/hours, is spent by the employees or users on manual tasks if the tool automates some of these tasks.
    • Reduction of business process steps (if the steps are being automated). To derive this metric, create a map of the business process before the introduction of the AI-powered tool and after, and determine if the tool helped to simplify the process by reducing the number of process steps.

    Bibliography

    Adryan, Boris. “Is it all machine learning?” Badryan, Oct. 20, 2015. Accessed Feb. 2022.

    “AI-Powered Data Management Platform.” Informatica, N.d. Accessed Feb 2022.

    Amazon Rekognition. “Automate your image and video analysis with machine learning.” AWS. N.d. Accessed Feb 2022.

    “Artificial Intelligence (AI).” IBM Cloud Education, 3 June 2020. Accessed Feb 2022.

    “Artificial intelligence (AI) vs machine learning (ML).” Microsoft Azure Documentation. Accessed Feb. 2022.

    “Avante Garde in the Realm of AI” SearchUnify Cognitive Platform. Accessed Feb 2022.

    “Azure Cognitive Services.” Microsoft. N.d. Accessed Feb 2022.

    “Becoming an AI-fueled organization. State of AI in the enterprise, 4th edition,” Deloitte, 2020. Accessed Feb. 2022.

    “Coveo Predictive Search.” Coveo, N.d. Accessed Feb 2022.

    ”Data and AI Leadership. Executive Survey 2022. Executive Summary of Findings.” NewVantage Partners. Accessed Feb 2022.

    “Einstein Discovery in Tableau.” Tableau, N.d. Accessed Feb 2022.

    Korolov, Maria. “9 biggest hurdles to AI adoption.” CIO, Feb 26, 2019. Accessed Feb 2022.

    Meel, Vidushi. “What Is Deep Learning? An Easy to Understand Guide.” visio.ai. Accessed Feb. 2022.

    Mitchell, Tom. “Machine Learning,” McGraw Hill, 1997.

    Stewart, Matthew. “The Actual Difference Between Statistics and Machine Learning.” Towards Data Science, Mar 24, 2019. Accessed Feb 2022.

    “Sentiment analysis with Cognitive Services.” Microsoft Azure Documentation. Accessed February 2022.

    “Three Principles for Designing ML-Powered Products.” Spotify Blog. Oct 2019, Accessed Feb 2022.

    “Video Intelligence API.” Google Cloud Platform. N.d. Accessed Feb 2022

    Create a Data Management Roadmap

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}122|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.3/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $100,135 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 36 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Data Management
    • Parent Category Link: /data-management

    Data has quickly become one of the most valuable assets in any organization. But when it comes to strategically and effectively managing those data assets, many businesses find themselves playing catch-up. The stakes are high because ineffective data management practices can have serious consequences, from poor business decisions and missed revenue opportunities to critical cybersecurity risks.

    Successful management and consistent delivery of data assets requires collaboration between the business and IT and the right balance of technology, process, and resourcing solutions.

    Build an effective and collaborative data management practice

    Data management is not one-size-fits-all. Cut through the noise around data management and create a roadmap that is right for your organization:

    • Align data management plans with business requirements and strategic plans.
    • Create a collaborative plan that unites IT and the business in managing data assets.
    • Design a program that can scale and evolve over time.
    • Perform data strategy planning and incorporate data capabilities into your broader plans.
    • Identify gaps in current data services and the supporting environment and determine effective corrective actions.

    This blueprint will help you design a data management practice that builds capabilities to support your organization’s current use of data and its vision for the future.

    Create a Data Management Roadmap Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Create a Data Management Roadmap Storyboard – Use this deck to help you design a data management practice and turn data into a strategic enabler for the organization.

    Effective data delivery and management provides the business with new and improved opportunities to leverage data for business operations and decision making. This blueprint will help you design a data management practice that will help your team build capabilities that align to the business' current usage of data and its vision for the future.

    • Create a Data Management Roadmap – Phases 1-2

    2. Data Management Strategy Planning Tools – Use these tools to align with the business and lay the foundations for the success of your data management practice.

    Begin by using the interview guide to engage stakeholders to gain a thorough understanding of the business’ challenges with data, their strategic goals, and the opportunities for data to support their future plans. From there, these tools will help you identify the current and target capabilities for your data management practice, analyze gaps, and build your roadmap.

    • Data Strategy Planning Interview Guide
    • Data Management Assessment and Planning Tool
    • Data Management Project Charter Template

    3. Stakeholder Communication and Assessment Tools – Use these templates to develop a communication strategy that will convey the value of the data management project to the organization and meet the needs of key stakeholders.

    Strong messaging around the value and purpose of the data management practice is essential to ensure buy-in. Use these templates to build a business case for the project and socialize the idea of data management across the various levels of the organization while anticipating the impact on and reactions from key stakeholders.

    • Data Management Communication/Business Case Template
    • Project Stakeholder and Impact Assessment Tool

    4. Data Management Strategy Work Breakdown Structure Template – Use this template to maintain strong project management throughout your data management project.

    This customizable template will support an organized approach to designing a program that addresses the business’ current and evolving data management needs. Use it to plan and track your deliverables and outcomes related to each stage of the project.

    • Data Management Strategy Work Breakdown Structure Template

    5. Data Management Roadmap Tools – Use these templates to plan initiatives and create a data management roadmap presentation.

    Create a roadmap for your data management practice that aligns to your organization’s current needs for data and its vision for how it wants to use data over the next 3-5 years. The initiative tool guides you to identify and record all initiative components, from benefits to costs, while the roadmap template helps you create a presentation to share your project findings with your executive team and project sponsors.

    • Initiative Definition Tool
    • Data Management Roadmap Template

    6. Track and Measure Benefits Tool – Use this tool to monitor the project’s progress and impact.

    Benefits tracking enables you to measure the effectiveness of your project and make adjustments where necessary to realize expected benefits. This tool will help you track benefit metrics at regular intervals to report progress on goals and identify benefits that are not being realized so that you can take remedial action.

    • Track and Measure Benefits Tool

    Infographic

    Workshop: Create a Data Management Roadmap

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Develop Data Strategies

    The Purpose

    Understand the business’s vision for data and the role of the data management practice.

    Determine business requirements for data.

    Map business goals and strategic plans to create data strategies.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understanding of business’s vision for data

    Unified vision for data management (business and IT)

    Identification of the business’s data strategies

    Activities

    1.1 Establish business context for data management.

    1.2 Develop data management principles and scope.

    1.3 Develop conceptual data model (subject areas).

    1.4 Discuss strategic information needs for each subject area.

    1.5 Develop data strategies.

    1.6 Identify data management strategies and enablers.

    Outputs

    Practice vision

    Data management guiding principles

    High-level data requirements

    Data strategies for key data assets

    2 Assess Data Management Capabilities

    The Purpose

    Determine the current and target states of your data management practice.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Clear understanding of current environment

    Activities

    2.1 Determine the role and scope of data management within the organization.

    2.2 Assess current data management capabilities.

    2.3 Set target data management capabilities.

    2.4 Identify performance gaps.

    Outputs

    Data management scope

    Data management capability assessment results

    3 Analyze Gaps and Develop Improvement Initiatives

    The Purpose

    Identify how to bridge the gaps between the organization’s current and target environments.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Creation of key strategic plans for data management

    Activities

    3.1 Evaluate performance gaps.

    3.2 Identify improvement initiatives.

    3.3 Create preliminary improvement plans.

    Outputs

    Data management improvement initiatives

    4 Design Roadmap and Plan Implementation

    The Purpose

    Create a realistic and action-oriented plan for implementing and improving the capabilities for data management.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Completion of a Data Management Roadmap

    Plan for how to implement the roadmap’s initiatives

    Activities

    4.1 Align data management initiatives to data strategies and business drivers.

    4.2 Identify dependencies and priorities

    4.3 Build a data management roadmap (short and long term)

    4.4 Create a communication plan

    Outputs

    Data management roadmap

    Action plan

    Communication plan

    Further reading

    Contents

    Executive Brief
    Analyst Perspective
    Executive Summary
    Phase 1: Build Business and User Context
    Phase 2: Assess Data Management and Build Your Roadmap
    Additional Support
    Related Research
    Bibliography

    Create a Data Management Roadmap

    Ensure the right capabilities to support your data strategy.

    EXECUTIVE BRIEF

    Analyst Perspective

    Establish a data management program to realize the data strategy vision and data-driven organization.

    Data is one of the most valuable organizational assets, and data management is the foundation – made up of plans, programs, and practices – that delivers, secures, and enhances the value of those assets.

    Digital transformation in how we do business and innovations like artificial intelligence and automation that deliver exciting experiences for our customers are all powered by readily available, trusted data. And there’s so much more of it.

    A data management roadmap designed for where you are in your business journey and what’s important to you provides tangible answers to “Where do we start?” and “What do we do?”

    This blueprint helps you build and enhance data management capabilities as well as identify the next steps for evaluating, strengthening, harmonizing, and optimizing these capabilities, aligned precisely with business objectives and data strategy.

    Andrea Malick
    Director, Research & Advisory, Data & Analytics Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Frame the problem

    Who this research is for
    • Data management professionals looking to improve the organization’s ability to leverage data in value-added ways
    • Data governance managers and data analysts looking to improve the effectiveness and value of their organization’s data management practice
    This research will help you
    • Align data management plans with business requirements and strategic plans.
    • Create a collaborative plan that unites IT and the business in managing the organization’s data assets.
    • Design a data management program that can scale and evolve over time.
    This research will also assist
    • Business leaders creating plans to leverage data in their strategic planning and business processes
    • IT professionals looking to improve the environment that manages and delivers data
    This research will also help you
    • Perform data strategy planning and incorporate data capabilities and plans into your broader plans.
    • Identify gaps in current data services and the supporting environment and determine effective corrective actions.

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge
    • The organizational appetite for data is increasing, with growing demands for data to better support business processes and inform decision making.
    • For data to be accessible and trustworthy for the business it must be effectively managed throughout its lifecycle.
    • With so much data circulating throughout our systems and a steady flow via user activity and business activities, it is imperative that we understand our data environment, focus our data services and oversight on what really matters, and work closely with business leads to ensure data is an integral part of the digital solution.
    Common Obstacles
    • Despite the growing focus on data, many organizations struggle to develop an effective strategy for managing their data assets.
    • Successful management and consistent delivery of data assets throughout their lifecycle requires the collaboration of the business and IT and the balance of technology, process, and resourcing solutions.
    • Employees are doing their best to just get things done with their own spreadsheets and familiar patterns of behavior. It takes leadership to pause those patterns and take a thoughtful enterprise and strategic approach to a more streamlined – and transformed – business data service.
    Info-Tech’s Approach
    • Incremental approach: Building a mature and optimized practice doesn’t occur overnight – it takes time and effort. Use this blueprint’s approach and roadmap results to support your organization in building a practice that prioritizes scope, increases the effectiveness of your data management practice, and improves your alignment with business data needs.
    • Build smart: Don’t do data management for data management’s sake; instead, align it to business requirements and the business’ vision for the organization’s data. Ensure initiatives and program investments best align to business priorities and support the organization in becoming more data driven and data centric.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Use value streams and business capabilities to develop a prioritized and practical data management plan that provides the highest business satisfaction in the shortest time.

    Full page illustration of the 'Create a Data Management Roadmap' using the image of a cargo ship labelled 'Data Management' moving in the direction of 'Business Strategy'. The caption at the top reads 'Data Management capabilities create new business value by augmenting data & optimizing it for analytics. Data is a digital imprint of organizational activities.'

    Data Management Capabilities

    A similar concept to the last one, with a ship moving toward 'Business Strategy', except the ship is cross-sectioned with different capabilities filling the interior of the silhouette. Below are different steps in data management 'Data Creation', 'Data Ingestion', 'Data Accumulation, 'Data Augmentation', 'Data Delivery', and 'Data Consumption'.

    Data is a business asset and needs to be treated like one

    Data management is an enabler of the business and therefore needs to be driven by business goals and objectives. For data to be a strategic asset of the business, the business and IT processes that support its delivery and management must be mature and clearly executed.

    Business Drivers
    1. Client Intimacy/Service Excellence
    2. Product and Service Innovations
    3. Operational Excellence
    4. Risk and Compliance Management
    Data Management Enablers
    • Data Governance
    • Data Strategy Planning
    • Data Architecture
    • Data Operations Management
    • Data Risk Management
    • Data Quality Management

    Industry spotlight: Risk management in the financial services sector

    REGULATORY
    COMPLIANCE

    Regulations are the #1 driver for risk management.

    US$11M:

    Fine incurred by a well-known Wall Street firm after using inaccurate data to execute short sales orders.
    “To successfully leverage customer data while maintaining compliance and transparency, the financial sector must adapt its current data management strategies to meet the needs of an ever-evolving digital landscape.” (Phoebe Fasulo, Security Scorecard, 2021)

    Industry spotlight: Operational excellence in the public sector

    GOVERNMENT
    TRANSPARENCY

    With frequent government scandals and corruption dominating the news, transparency to the public is quickly becoming a widely adopted practice at every level of government. Open government is the guiding principle that the public has access to the documents and proceedings of government to allow for effective public oversight. With growing regulations and pressure from the public, governments must adopt a comprehensive data management strategy to ensure they remain accountable to their rate payers, residents, businesses, and other constituents.

    1. Transparency Transparency is not just about access; it’s about sharing and reuse.
    2. Social and commercial value Everything from finding your local post office to building a search engine requires access to data.
    3. Participatory government Open data enables citizens to be more directly informed and involved in decision making.

    Industry spotlight: Operational excellence and client intimacy in major league sports

    SPORTS
    ANALYTICS

    A professional sports team is essentially a business that is looking for wins to maximize revenue. While they hope for a successful post-season, they also need strong quarterly results, just like you. Sports teams are renowned for adopting data-driven decision making across their organizations to do everything from improving player performance to optimizing tickets sales. At the end of the day, to enable analytics you must have top-notch information management.

    Team Performance Benefits
    1. Talent identification
    2. In-game decision making
    3. Injury reduction
    4. Athlete performance
    5. Bargaining agreement
    Team Performance Benefits
    1. Fan engagement
    2. Licensing
    3. Sports gambling
    (Deloitte Insights, 2020)
    Industry leaders cite data, and the insights they glean from it, as their means of standing apart from their competitors.

    Industry spotlight: Operational excellence and service delivery within manufacturing and supply chain services

    SUPPLY CHAIN
    EFFICIENCY

    Data offers key insights and opportunities when it comes to supply chain management. The supply chain is where the business strategy gets converted to operational service delivery of the business. Proper data management enables business processes to become more efficient, productive, and profitable through the greater availability of quality data and analysis.

    Fifty-seven percent of companies believe that supply chain management gives them a competitive advantage that enables them to further develop their business (FinancesOnline, 2021).

    Involving Data in Your Supply Chain

    25%

    Companies can reap a 25% increase in productivity, a 20% gain in space usage, and a 30% improvement in stock use efficiency if they use integrated order processing for their inventory system.

    36%

    Thirty-six percent of supply chain professionals say that one of the top drivers of their analytics initiatives is the optimization of inventory management to balance supply and demand.
    (Source: FinancesOnline, 2021)

    Industry spotlight: Intelligent product innovation and strong product portfolios differentiate consumer retailers and CPGs

    INFORMED PRODUCT
    DEVELOPMENT
    Consumer shopping habits and preferences are notoriously variable, making it a challenge to develop a well-received product. Information and insights into consumer trends, shopping preferences, and market analysis support the probability of a successful outcome.

    Maintaining a Product Portfolio
    What is selling? What is not selling?

    Product Development
    • Based on current consumer buying patterns, what will they buy next?
    • How will this product be received by consumers?
    • What characteristics do consumers find important?
    A combination of operational data and analytics data is required to accurately answer these questions.
    Internal Data
    • Organizational sales performance
    External Data
    • Competitor performance
    • Market analysis
    • Consumer trends and preferences
    Around 75% of ideas fail for organizational reasons – viability or feasibility or time to market issues. On the other hand, around 20% of product ideas fail due to user-related issues – not valuable or usable (Medium, 2020).

    Changes in business and technology are changing how organizations use and manage data

    The world moves a lot faster today

    Businesses of today operate in real time. To maintain a competitive edge, businesses must identify and respond quickly to opportunities and events.

    To effectively do this businesses must have accurate and up-to-date data at their fingertips.

    To support the new demands around data consumption, data velocity (pace in which data is captured, organized, and analyzed) must also accelerate.

    Data Management Implications
    • Strong integration capabilities
    • Intelligent and efficient systems
    • Embedded data quality management
    • Strong transparency into the history of data and its transformation

    Studies and projections show a clear case of how data and its usage will grow and evolve.

    Zettabyte Era

    64.2

    More Data

    The amount of data created, consumed, and stored globally is forecast to increase rapidly, reaching 64.2 zettabytes in 2020 and projected to grow to over 180 zettabyes in 2025 (Statista, 2021).

    Evolving Technologies

    $480B

    Cloud Proliferation

    Global end-user spending on public cloud services is expected to exceed $480 billion next year (Info-Tech, 2021).

    To differentiate and remain competitive in today’s marketplace, organizations are becoming more data-driven

    Pyramid with a blue tip. Sublevels from top down are labelled 'Analytical Companies', 'Analytical Aspirations', 'Localized Analytics', and 'Analytically Impaired'.

    Analytic Competitor

    “Given the unforgiving competitive landscape, organizations have to transform now, and correctly. Winning requires an outcome-focused analytics strategy.” (Ramya Srinivasan, Forbes, 2021)
    Data and the use of data analytics has become a centerpiece to effective modern business. Top-performing organizations across a variety of industries have been cited as using analytics five times more than lower performers (MIT Sloan).

    The strategic value of data

    Power intelligent and transformative organizational performance through leveraging data.

    Respond to industry disruptors

    Optimize the way you serve your stakeholders and customers

    Develop products and services to meet ever-evolving needs

    Manage operations and mitigate risk

    Harness the value of your data

    Despite investments in data initiatives, organizations are carrying high levels of data debt

    Data debt is the accumulated cost that is associated with the suboptimal governance of data assets in an enterprise, like technical debt.

    Data debt is a problem for 78% of organizations.

    40%

    of organizations say individuals within the business do not trust data insights.

    66%

    of organizations say a backlog of data debt is impacting new data management initiatives.

    33%

    of organizations are not able to get value from a new system or technology investment.

    30%

    of organizations are unable to become data-driven.

    (Source: Experian, 2020)

    The journey to being data-driven

    The journey to becoming a data-driven organization requires a pit stop at data enablement.

    The Data Economy

    Diagram of 'The Data Economy' with three points on an arrow. 'Data Disengaged: You have a low appetite for data and rarely use data for decision making.' 'Data Enabled: Technology, data architecture, and people and processes are optimized and supported by data governance.' 'Data Driven: You are differentiating and competing on data and analytics, described as a “data first” organization. You’re collaborating through data. Data is an asset.'

    Measure success to demonstrate tangible business value

    Put data management into the context of the business:
    • Tie the value of data management and its initiatives back to the business capabilities that are enabled.
    • Leverage the KPIs of those business capabilities to demonstrate tangible and measurable value. Use terms and language that will resonate with senior leadership.

    Don’t let measurement be an afterthought:

    Start substantiating early on how you are going to measure success as your data management program evolves.

    Build a right-sized roadmap

    Formulate an actionable roadmap that is right-sized to deliver value in your organization.

    Key considerations:
    • When building your data management roadmap, ensure you do so through an enterprise lens. Be cognizant of other initiatives that might be coming down the pipeline that may require you to align your data governance milestones accordingly.
    • Apart from doing your planning with consideration for other big projects or launches that might be in-flight and require the time and attention of your data management partners, also be mindful of the more routine yet still demanding initiatives.
    • When doing your roadmapping, consider factors like the organization’s fiscal cycle, typical or potential year-end demands, and monthly/quarterly reporting periods and audits. Initiatives such as these are likely to monopolize the time and focus of personnel key to delivering on your data management milestones
    Sample milestones:
    • Data Management Leadership & Org Structure Definition
      Define the home for data management, as approved by senior leadership.
    • Data Management Charter and Policies
      Create a charter for your program and build/refresh associated policies.
    • Data Culture Diagnostic
      Understand the organization’s current data culture, perception of data, value of data, and knowledge gaps.
    • Use Case Build and Prioritization
      Build a use case that is tied to business capabilities. Prioritize accordingly.
    • Business Data Glossary/Catalog
      Build and/or refresh the business’ glossary for addressing data definitions and standardization issues.
    • Tools & Technology
      Explore the tools and technology offering in the data management space that would serve as an enabler to the program (e.g. RFI, RFP).

    Insight summary

    Overarching insight

    Your organization’s value streams and the associated business capabilities require effectively managed data. Whether building customer service excellence or getting ahead of cyberattacks, a data management practice is the dependable mainstay supporting business operations and transformation.

    Insight 1

    Data – it’s your business.
    Data is a digital imprint of business activities. Data architecture and flows are reflective of the organizational business architecture. Take data management capabilities as seriously as other core business capabilities.

    Insight 2

    Take a data-oriented approach.
    Data management must be data-centric – with technology and functional enablement built around the data and its structure and flows. Maintain the data focus during project’s planning, delivery, and evaluation stages.

    Insight 3

    Get the business into the data business.
    Data is not “IT’s thing.” Just as a bank helps you properly allocate your money to achieve your financial goals, IT will help you implement data management to support your business goals, but the accountability for data resides with the business.

    Tactical insight

    Data management is the program and environment we build once we have direction, i.e. a data strategy, and we have formed an ongoing channel with the guiding voice of the business via data governance. Without an ultimate goal in a strategy or the real requirements of the business, what are we building data systems and processes for? We are used to tech buzz words and placing our hope in promising innovations like artificial intelligence. There are no shortcuts, but there are basic proven actions we can take to meet the digital revolution head on and let our data boost our journey.

    Key deliverable:

    Data Management Roadmap Template

    Use this template to guide you in translating your project's findings and outcomes into a presentation that can be shared with your executive team and project sponsors.

    Sample of the 'Data Management Roadmap Template' key deliverable.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    Data Management Assessment and Planning Tool

    Use this tool to support your team in assessing and designing the capabilities and components of your organization's data management practice. Sample of the 'Data Management Assessment and Planning Tool' deliverable.

    Data Culture Diagnostic and Scorecard

    Sample of the 'Data Culture Diagnostic and Scorecard' deliverable.

    Leverage Info-Tech’s Data Culture Diagnostic to understand how your organization scores across 10 areas relating to data culture.

    Business Capability Map

    This template takes you through a business capability and value stream mapping to identify the data capabilities required to enable them. Sample of the 'Business Capability Map' deliverable.

    Measure the value of this blueprint

    Leverage this blueprint’s approach to ensure your data management initiatives align and support your key value streams and their business capabilities.
    • Aligning your data management program and its initiatives to your organization’s business capabilities is vital for tracing and demonstrating measurable business value for the program.
    • This alignment of data management with value streams and business capabilities enables you to use business-defined KPIs and demonstrate tangible value.

    Project outcome

    Metric

    Timely data delivery Time of data delivery to consumption
    Improved data quality Data quality scorecard metrics
    Data provenance transparency Time for data auditing (from report/dashboard to the source)
    New reporting and analytic capabilities Number of level 2 business capabilities implemented as solutions
    In Phase 1 of this blueprint, we will help you establish the business context, define your business drivers and KPIs, and understand your current data management capabilities and strengths.

    In Phase 2, we will help you develop a plan and a roadmap for addressing any gaps and improving the relevant data management capabilities so that data is well positioned to deliver on those defined business metrics.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Create a Data Management Roadmap project overview

    1. Build Business Context and Drivers for the Data Management Program 2. Assess Data Management and Build Your Roadmap
    Best-Practice Toolkit

    1.1 Review the Data Management Framework

    1.2 Understand and Align to Business Drivers

    1.3 Build High-Value Use Cases

    1.4 Create a Vision

    2.1 Assess Data Management

    2.2 Build Your Data Management Roadmap

    2.3 Organize Business Data Domains

    Guided Implementation
    • Call 1
    • Call 2
    • Call 3
    • Call 4
    • Call 5
    • Call 6
    • Call 7
    • Call 8
    • Call 9
    Phase Outcomes
    • An understanding of the core components of an effective data management program
    • Your organization’s business capabilities and value streams
    • A business capability map for your organization
    • High-value use cases for data management
    • Vision and guiding principles for data management
    • An understanding of your organization’s current data management capabilities
    • Definition of target-state capabilities and gaps
    • Roadmap of priority data management initiatives
    • Business data domains and ownership

    Guided Implementation

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is 8 to 12 calls over the course of 4 to 6 months.

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    Call #1: Understand drivers, business context, and scope of data management at your organization. Learn about Info-Tech’s approach and resources.

    Call #2: Get a detailed overview of Info-Tech’s approach, framework, Data Culture Diagnostic, and blueprint.

    Call #3:Align your business capabilities with your data management capabilities. Begin to develop a use case framework.

    Call #4:Further discuss alignment of business capabilities to data management capabilities and use case framework.

    Call #5: Assess your current data management capabilities and data environment. Review your Data Culture Diagnostic Scorecard, if applicable.

    Call #6: Plan target state and corresponding initiatives.

    Call #7: Identify program risks and formulate a roadmap.

    Call #8: Identify and prioritize improvements. Define a RACI chart.

    Call #9: Summarize results and plan next steps.

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com1-888-670-8889
    Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
    Activities
    Understand and contextualize

    1.1 Review your data strategy.

    1.2 Learn data management capabilities.

    1.3 Discuss DM capabilities cross-dependencies and interactions.

    1.4 Develop high-value use cases.

    Assess current DM capabilities and set improvement targets

    2.1 Assess you current DM capabilities.

    2.2 Set targets for DM capabilities.

    Formulate and prioritize improvement initiatives

    3.1 Formulate core initiatives for DM capabilities improvement.

    3.2 Discuss dependencies across the initiatives and prioritize them.

    Plan for delivery dates and assign RACI

    4.1 Plan dates and assign RACI for the initiatives.

    4.2 Brainstorm initiatives to address gaps and enable business goals.

    Next steps and wrap-up (offsite)

    5.1 Complete in-progress deliverables from previous four days.

    5.2 Set up review time for workshop deliverables and to discuss next steps.

    Deliverables
    1. Understanding of the data management capabilities and their interactions and logical dependencies
    2. Use cases
    1. DM capability assessment results
    2. DM vision and guiding principles
    1. Prioritized DM capabilities improvement initiatives
    1. DM capabilities improvement roadmap
    2. Business data domains and ownership
    1. Workshop final report with key findings and recommendations

    Full page diagram of the 'Data & Analytics landscape'. Caption reads 'The key to landscaping your data environment lies in ensuring foundational disciplines are optimized in a way that recognizes the interdependency among the various disciplines.' Many foundational disciplines are color-coded to a legend determining whether its 'accountability sits with IT' or 'with the business; CDO'. An arrow labeled 'You Are Here' points to 'Data Management', which is coded in both colors meaning both IT and the business are accountable.

    What is data management and why is it needed?

    “Data management is the development, execution, and supervision of plans, policies, programs and practices that deliver, control, protect and enhance the value of data and information assets throughout their lifecycles.” (DAMA International, 2017)

    Achieving successful management and consistent delivery of data assets throughout their lifecycle requires the collaboration of the business and IT and the balance of technology, process, and resourcing solutions.

    Who:

    This research is designed for:
    • Data management heads and professionals looking to improve their organization’s ability to leverage data in value-added ways.
    • Data management and IT professionals looking to optimize the data environment, from creation and ingestion right through to consumption.

    Are your data management capabilities optimized to support your organization’s data use and demand?

    What is the current situation?

    Situation
    • The volume and variety of data are growing exponentially and show no sign of slowing down.
    • Business landscapes and models are evolving.
    • Users and stakeholders are becoming more and more data-centric, with maturing and demanding expectations.
    Complication
    • Organizations struggle to develop a comprehensive approach to optimizing data management.
    • In their efforts to keep pace with the demands for data, data management groups often adopt a piecemeal approach that includes turning to tools as a means to address the needs.
    • Data architecture, models, and designs fail to deliver real and measurable business impact and value. Technology ROI is not realized.
    Info-Tech Insight

    A data strategy should never be formulated disjointed from the business. Ensure the data strategy aligns with the business strategy and supports the business architecture.

    Info-Tech’s Data Management Framework

    What Is Data Management?

    Data management is the development, execution, and supervision of plans, policies, programs and practices that deliver, control, protect and enhance the value of data and information assets throughout their lifecycles.” (DAMA International, 2017)

    The three-tiered Data Management Framework, tiers are labelled 'Data Management Enablers', 'Information Dimensions', and 'Business Information'.

    Adapted from DAMA-DMBOK and Advanced Knowledge Innovations Global Solutions

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    Info-Tech’s Data Management Framework is designed to show how an organization’s business model sits as the foundation of its data management practice. Drawing from the requirements of the underpinning model, a practice is designed and maintained through the creation and application of the enablers and dimensions of data management.

    Build a data management practice that is centered on supporting the business and its use of key data assets

    Business Resources

    Data subject areas provide high-level views of the data assets that are used in business processes and enable an organization to perform its business functions.

    Classified by specific subjects, these groups reflect data elements that, when used effectively, are able to support analytical and operational use cases of data.

    This layer is representative of the delivery of the data assets and the business’ consumption of the data.

    Data is an integral business asset that exists across all areas of an organization

    Equation stating 'Trustworthy and Usable Data' plus 'Well-Designed and Executed Processes' equals 'Business Capabilities and Functions'.
    Data Management Framework with only the bottom tier highlighted.

    For a data management practice to be effective it ultimately must show how its capabilities and operations better support the business in accessing and leveraging its key data assets.*

    *This project focuses on building capabilities for data management. Leverage our data quality management research to support you in assessing the performance of this model.

    Information dimensions support the different types of data present within an organization’s environment

    Information Dimensions

    Components at the Information Dimensions layer manage the different types of data and information present with an environment.

    At this layer, data is managed based on its type and how the business is looking to use and access the data.

    Custom capabilities are developed at this level to support:

    • Structured data
    • Semi-structured data
    • Unstructured data
    The types, formats, and structure of the data are managed at this level using the data management enablers to support their successful execution and performance.
    Data Management Framework with only the middle tier highlighted.

    Build a data management practice with strong process capabilities

    Use these guiding principles to contextualize the purpose and value for each data management enabler.

    Data Management Framework with only the top tier highlighted.

    Data Management Enablers

    Info-Tech categorizes data management enablers as the processes that guide the management of the organization’s data assets and support the delivery.

    Govern and Direct

    • Ensures data management practices and processes follow the standards and policies outlined for them
    • Manages the executive oversight of the broader practice

    Align and Plan

    • Aligns data management plans to the business’ data requirements
    • Creates the plans to guide the design and execution of data management components

    Build, Acquire, Operate, Deliver, and Support

    • Executes the operations that manage data as it flows through the business environment
    • Manages the business’ risks in relation to its data assets and the level of security and access required

    Monitor and Improve

    • Analyzes the performance of data management components and the quality of business data
    • Creates and execute plans to improve the performance of the practice and the quality and use of data assets

    Use Info-Tech’s assessment framework to support your organization’s data management planning

    Info-Tech employs a consumer-driven approach to requirements gathering in order to support a data management practice. This will create a vision and strategic plan that will help to make data an enabler to the business as it looks to achieve its strategic objectives.

    Data Strategy Planning

    To support the project in building an accurate understanding of the organization’s data requirements and the role of data in its operations (current and future), the framework first guides organizations on a business and subject area assessment.

    By focusing on data usage and strategies for unique data subject areas, the project team will be better able to craft a data management practice with capabilities that will generate the greatest value and proactively handle evolving data requirements.

    Arrow pointing right.

    Data Management Assessment

    To support the design of a fit-for-purpose data management practice that aligns with the business’ data requirements this assessment will guide you in:

    • Determining the target capabilities for the different dimensions of data management.
    • Identifying the interaction dependencies and coordination efforts required to build a successful data management practice.

    Create a Data Management Roadmap

    Phase 1

    Build Business Context and Drivers for the Data Management Program

    Phase 1

    1.1 Review the Data Management Framework

    1.2 Understand and Align to Business Drivers

    1.3 Build High-Value Use Cases

    1.4 Create a Vision

    Phase 2

    2.1 Assess Data Management

    2.2 Build Your Data Management Roadmap

    2.3 Organize Business Data Domains

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify your business drivers and business capabilities.
    • Align data management capabilities with business goals.
    • Define scope and vision of the data management plan.
    • This phase involves the follow

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Data Management Lead/Information Management Lead, CDO, Data Lead
    • Senior Business Leaders
    • Business SMEs
    • Data Owners, Records Managers, Regulatory Subject Matter Experts (e.g. Legal Counsel, Security)

    Step 1.1

    Review the Data Management Framework

    Activities

    1.1.1 Walk through the main parts of the best-practice Data Management Framework

    This step will guide you through the following activities:

    • Understand the main disciplines and makeup of a best-practice data management program.
    • Determine which data management capabilities are considered high priority by your organization.

    Outcomes of this step

    • A foundation for data management initiative planning that’s aligned with the organization’s business architecture: value streams, business capability map, and strategy map
    Build Business Context and Drivers
    Step 1.1 Step 1.2 Step 1.3 Step 1.4

    Full page diagram of the 'Data & Analytics landscape'. Caption reads 'The key to landscaping your data environment lies in ensuring foundational disciplines are optimized in a way that recognizes the interdependency among the various disciplines.' Many foundational disciplines are color-coded to a legend determining whether its 'accountability sits with IT' or 'with the business; CDO'. An arrow labeled 'You Are Here' points to 'Data Management', which is coded in both colors meaning both IT and the business are accountable.

    Full page illustration of the 'Create a Data Management Roadmap' using the image of a cargo ship labelled 'Data Management' moving in the direction of 'Business Strategy'. The caption at the top reads 'Data Management capabilities create new business value by augmenting data & optimizing it for analytics. Data is a digital imprint of organizational activities.'

    Data Management Capabilities

    A similar concept to the last one, with a ship moving toward 'Business Strategy', except the ship is cross-sectioned with different capabilities filling the interior of the silhouette. Below are different steps in data management 'Data Creation', 'Data Ingestion', 'Data Accumulation, 'Data Augmentation', 'Data Delivery', and 'Data Consumption'.

    Build a Robust & Comprehensive Data Strategy

    Business Strategy

    Organizational Goals & Objectives

    Business Drivers

    Industry Drivers

    Current Environment

    Data Management Capability Maturity Assessment

    Data Culture Diagnostic

    Regulatory and Compliance Requirements

    Data Strategy

    Organizational Drivers and Data Value

    Data Strategy Objectives & Guiding Principles

    Data Strategy Vision and Mission

    Data Strategy Roadmap

    People: Roles and Organizational Structure

    Data Culture & Data Literacy

    Data Management and Tools

    Risk and Feasibility

    Unlock the Value of Data

    Generate Game-Changing Insights

    Fuel Data-Driven Decision Making

    Innovate and Transform With Data

    Thrive and Differentiate With a Data-Driven Culture

    Elevate Organizational Data IQ

    Build a Foundation for Data Valuation

    What is a data strategy and why is it needed?

    • Your data strategy is the vehicle for ensuring data is poised to support your organization’s strategic objectives.
    • For any CDO or equivalent data leader, a robust and comprehensive data strategy is the number one tool in your toolkit for generating measurable business value from data.
    • The data strategy will serve as the mechanism for making high-quality, trusted, and well-governed data readily available and accessible to deliver on your organizational mandate.

    What is driving the need to formulate or refresh your organization’s data strategy?

    Who:

    This research is designed for:

    • Chief Data Officer (CDO) or equivalent
    • Head of Data
    • Chief Analytics Officer (CAO)
    • Head of Digital Transformation
    • CIO

    Info-Tech Insight

    A data strategy should never be formulated disjointed from the business. Ensure the data strategy aligns with the business strategy and supports the business architecture.

    Info-Tech’s Data Governance Framework

    Model of Info-Tech's Data Governance Framework titled 'Key to Data Enablement'. There are inputs, a main Data Governance cycle, and a selection of outputs. The inputs are 'Business Strategy' and 'Data Strategy' injected into the cycle via 'Strategic Goals & Objectives'. The cycle consists of 'Operating Model', 'Policies & Procedures', 'Data Literacy & Culture', 'Enterprise Projects & Services', 'Data Management', 'Data Privacy & Security', 'Data Leadership', and 'Data Ownership & Stewardship'. The latter two are part of 'Enterprise Governance's 'Oversight & Alignment' cycle. Outputs are 'Defined Data Accountability & Responsibility', 'Knowledge & Common Understanding of Data Assets', 'Trust & Confidence in Traceable Data', 'Improved Data ROI & Reduced Data Debt', and 'Support of Ethical Use of Data in a Data-Driven Culture'.

    What is data governance and why is it needed?

    • Data governance is an enabling framework of decision rights, responsibilities, and accountabilities for data assets across the enterprise.
    • It should deliver agreed-upon models that are conducive to your organization’s operating culture, where there is clarity on who can do what with which data and via what means.
    • It is the key enabler for bringing high-quality, trusted, secure, and discoverable data to the right users across your organization.
    • It promotes and drives responsible and ethical use and handling of data while helping to build and foster an organizational culture of data excellence.

    Do you feel there is a clear definition of data accountability and responsibility in your organization?

    Who:

    This research is designed for:

    • Chief Data Officer (CDO) or equivalent
    • Head of Data Governance, Lead Data Governance Officer
    • Head of Data
    • Head of Digital Transformation
    • CIO

    Info-Tech Insight

    Data governance should not sit as an island in your organization. It must continuously align with the organization’s enterprise governance function.

    A diagram titled 'Data Platform Selection - Make complex tasks simple by applying proven methodology to connect businesses to software' with five steps. '1. Formalize a Business Strategy', '2. Identify Platform Specific Considerations', '3. Execute Data Platform Architecture Selection', 'Select Software', 'Achieve Business Goals'.

    Info-Tech’s Data Platform Framework

    Data pipeline for versatile and scalable data delivery

    a diagram showing the path from 'Data Creation' to 'Data Accumulation', to 'Engineering & Augmentation', to 'Data Delivery'. Each step has a 'Fast Lane', 'Operational Lane', and 'Curated Lane'.

    What are the data platform and practice and why are they needed?

    • The data platform and practice are two parts of the data and analytics equation:
      • The practice is about the operating model for data; that is, how stakeholders work together to deliver business value on your data platform. These stakeholders are a combination of business and IT from across the organization.
      • The platform is a combination of the architectural components of the data and analytics landscape that come together to support the role the business plays day to day with respect to data.
    • Don’t jump directly into technology: use Info-Tech tools to solve and plan first.
    • Create a continuous roadmap to implement and evolve your data practice and platform.
    • Promote collaboration between the business and IT by clearly defining responsibilities.

    Does your data platform effectively serve your reporting and analytics capabilities?

    Who:

    This research is designed for:

    • Data and Information Leadership
    • Enterprise Information Architect
    • Data Architect
    • Data Engineer/Modeler

    Info-Tech Insight

    Info-Tech’s approach is driven by business goals and leverages standard data practice and platform patterns. This enables the implementation of critical and foundational data and analytics components first and subsequently facilitates the evolution and development of the practice and platform over time.

    Info-Tech’s Reporting and Analytics Framework

    Formulating an enterprise reporting and analytics strategy requires the business vision and strategies to first be substantiated. Any optimization to the data warehouse, integration, and source layers is in turn driven by the enterprise reporting and analytics strategy.
    A diagram of the 'Reporting and Analytics Framework' with 'Business vision/strategies' fed through four stages beginning with 'Business Intelligence: Reporting & Analytics Strategy', 'Data Warehouse: Data Warehouse/ Data Lake Strategy', 'Integration and Translation: Data Integration Strategy', 'Sources: Source Strategy (Content/Quality)'
    The current states of your integration and warehouse platforms determine what data can be used for BI and analytics.
    Your enterprise reporting and analytics strategy is driven by your organization’s vision and corporate strategy.

    What is reporting and analytics and why is it needed?

    • Reporting and analytics bridges the gap between an organization’s data assets and consumable information that facilitates insight generation and informed or evidence-based decision making.
    • The reporting and analytics strategy drives data warehouse and integration strategies and the data needs to support business decisions.
    • The reporting and analytics strategy ensures that the investment made in optimizing the data environment to support reporting and analytics is directly aligned with the organization’s needs and priorities and hence will deliver measurable business value.

    Do you have a strategy to enable self-serve analytics? What does your operating model look like? Have you an analytics CoE?

    Who:

    This research is designed for:

    • Head of BI and Analytics
    • CIO or Business Unit (BU) Leader looking to improve reporting and analytics
    • Applications Lead

    Info-Tech Insight

    Formulating an enterprise reporting and analytics strategy requires the business vision and strategies to first be substantiated. Any optimization to the data warehouse, integration, and source layer is in turn driven by the enterprise reporting and analytics strategy.

    Info-Tech’s Data Architecture Framework

    Info-Tech’s methodology:
      1. Prioritize your core business objectives and identify your business driver.
      2. Learn how business drivers apply to specific tiers of Info-Tech’s five-tier data architecture model.
      3. Determine the appropriate tactical pattern that addresses your most important requirements.
    Visual diagram of the first two parts of the methodology on the left. Objectives apply to the data architecture model, which appropriates tactical patterns, which leads to a focus.
      1. Select the areas of the five-tier architecture to focus on.
      2. Measure your current state.
      3. Set the targets of your desired optimized state.
      1. Roadmap your tactics.
      2. Manage and communicate change.
    Visual diagram of the third part of the methodology on the left. A roadmap of tactics leads to communicating change.

    What is data architecture and why is it needed?

    • Data architecture is the set of rules, policies, standards, and models that govern and define the type of data collected and how it is used, stored, managed, and integrated within the organization and its database systems.
    • In general, the primary objective of data architecture is the standardization of data for the benefit of the organization.

    Is your architecture optimized to sustainably deliver readily available and accessible data to users?

    Who:

    This research is designed for:

    • Data Architects or their equivalent
    • Enterprise Architects
    • Head of Data
    • CIO
    • Database Administrators

    Info-Tech Insight

    Data architecture is not just about models. Viewing data architecture as just technical data modeling can lead to a data environment that does not aptly serve or support the business. Identify your business’ priorities and adapt your data architecture to those needs.

    A diagram titled 'Build Your Data Quality Program'. '1. Data Quality & Data Culture Diagnostics Business Landscape Exercise', '2. Business Strategy & Use Cases', '3. Prioritize Use Cases With Poor Quality'. 'Info-Tech Insight: As data is ingested, integrated, and maintained in the various streams of the organization's system and application architecture, there are multiple points where the quality of the data can degrade.' A data flow diagram points out how 'Data quality issues can occur at any stage of the data flow', and that it is better to 'Fix data quality root causes here' during the 'Data Creation', 'Data Ingestion', and 'Data Accumulation & Engineering' stages in order 'to prevent expensive cures here' in the 'Data Delivery' and 'Reporting & Analytics' stages.

    What is data quality management and why is it needed?

    • Data is the foundation of decisions made at data-driven organizations.
    • Data quality management ensures that foundation is sustainably solid.
    • If there are problems with the organization’s underlying data, it can have a domino effect on many downstream business functions.
    • The transformational insights that executives are constantly seeking can be uncovered by a data quality practice that makes high-quality, trustworthy information readily available to the business users who need it.

    Do your users have an optimal level of trust and confidence in the quality of the organization’s data?

    Who:

    This research is designed for:

    • Chief Data Officer (CDO) or equivalent Head of Data
    • Chief Analytics Officer (CAO)
    • Head of Digital Transformation
    • CIO

    Info-Tech Insight

    Data quality suffers most at the point of entry. The resulting domino effect of error propagation makes these errors among the most costly forms of data quality errors. Fix data ingestion, whether through improving your application and database design or improving your data ingestion policy, and you will fix a majority of data quality issues.

    Info-Tech’s Enterprise Content Management Framework

    Drivers Governance Information Architecture Process Policy Systems Architecture
    Regulatory, Legal –›
    Efficiency, Cost-Effectiveness –›
    Customer Service –›
    User Experience –›
    • Establish decision-making committee
    • Define and formalize roles (RACI, charter)
    • Develop policies
    • Create business data glossary
    • Decide who approves documents in workflow
    • Operating models
    • Information categories (taxonomy)
    • Classifications, retention periods
    • Metadata (for findability and as tags in automated workflows)
    • Review and approval process, e.g. who approves
    • Process for admins to oversee performance of IM service
    • Process for capturing and classifying incoming documents
    • Audit trails and reporting process
    • Centralized index of data and records to be tracked and managed throughout their lifecycle
    • Data retention policy
    • E-signature policy
    • Email policy
    • Information management policies
    • Access/privacy rules
    • Understand the flow of content through multiple systems (e.g. email, repositories)
    • Define business and technical requirements to select a new content management platform/service
    • Improve integrations
    • Right-size solutions for use case (e.g. DAM)
    • Communication/Change Management
    • Data Literacy

    What is enterprise content management and why is it needed?

    “Enterprise Content Management is the systematic collection and organization of information that is to be used by a designated audience – business executives, customers, etc. Neither a single technology nor a methodology nor a process, it is a dynamic combination of strategies, methods and tools used to capture, manage, store, preserve and deliver information supporting key organizational processes through its entire lifecycle.” (AIIM, 2021)

    • Changing your ECM capabilities is about changing organizational behavior; take an all-hands-on-deck approach to make the most of information gathering, create a vested interest, and secure buy-in.
    • It promotes and drives responsible and ethical use and handling of content while helping to build and foster an organizational culture of information excellence.

    Who:

    This research is designed for:

    • Information Architect
    • Chief Data Officer (CDO)
    • Head of Data, Information Management
    • Records Management
    • CIO

    Info-Tech Insight

    ECM is critical to becoming a digital and modernized operation, where both structured data (such as sales reports) and unstructured content (such as customer sentiment in social media) are brought together for a 360-degree view of the customer or for a comprehensive legal discovery.

    Metadata management/Data cataloging

    Overview

    Metadata is structured information that describes, explains, locates, or otherwise makes it easier to retrieve, use, or manage an information resource. Metadata is often called data about data or information about information (NISO).

    Metadata management is the function that manages and maintains the technology and processes that creates, processes, and stores metadata created by business processes and data.

    90%

    The majority of data is unstructured information like text, video, audio, web server logs, social media, and more (MIT Sloan, 2021).
    As data becomes more unstructured, complex, and manipulated, the importance and value of metadata will grow exponentially and support improved:
    • Data consumption
    • Quality management
    • Risk management

    Value of Effective Metadata Management

    • Supports the traceability of data through an environment.
    • Creates standards and logging that enable information and data to be searchable and cataloged.
    • Metadata schemas enable easier transferring and distribution of data across different environments.
    Data about data: The true value of metadata and the management practices supporting it is its ability to provide deeper understanding and auditability to the data assets and processes of the business.
    Metadata supports the use of:
    Big Data
    Unstructured data
    Content and Documents
    Unstructured and semi-structured data
    Structured data
    Master, reference, etc.

    Critical Success Factors of Metadata Management

    • Consistent and documented data standards and definitions
    • Architectural planning for metadata
    • Incorporation of metadata into system design and the processing of data
    • Technology to support metadata creation, collection, storage, and reviews (metadata repository, meta marts, etc.)

    Info-Tech’s Data Integration Framework

    On one hand…

    Data has massive potential to bring insight to an organization when combined and analyzed in creative ways.

    On the other hand…

    It is difficult to bring data together from different sources to generate insights and prevent stale data.

    How can these two ideas be reconciled?

    Answer: Info-Tech’s Data Integration Onion Framework summarizes an organization’s data environment at a conceptual level and is used to design a common data-centric integration environment.

    A diagram of the 'Data Integration Onion Framework' with five layers: 'Enterprise Business Processes', 'Enterprise Analytics', 'Enterprise Integration', 'Enterprise Data Repositories', and 'Enterprise Data' at the center.
    Info-Tech’s Data Integration Onion Framework
    Data-centric integration is the solution you need to bring data together to break down data silos.

    What is data integration and why is it needed?

    • To get more value from their information, organizations are relying on increasingly more complex data sources. These diverse data sources have to be properly integrated to unlock the full potential of that data.
    • Integrating large volumes of data from the many varied sources in an organization has incredible potential to yield insights, but many organizations struggle with creating the right structure for that blending to take place, and that leads to the formation of data silos.
    • Data-centric integration capabilities can break down organizational silos. Once data silos are removed and all the information that is relevant to a given problem is available, problems with operational and transactional efficiencies can be solved, and value from business intelligence (BI) and analytics can be fully realized.

    Is your integration near real time and scalable?

    Who:

    This research is designed for:

    • Data Engineers
    • Business Analysts
    • Data Architects
    • Head of Data Management
    • Enterprise Architects

    Info-Tech Insight

    Every IT project requires data integration. Any change in the application and database ecosystem requires you to solve a data integration problem.

    Info-Tech’s Master Data Management Framework

    Master data management (MDM) “entails control over Master Data values and identifiers that enable consistent use, across systems, of the most accurate and timely data about essential business entities” (DAMA, 2017).

    The Data Management Framework from earlier with tier 2 item 'Reference and Master' highlighted.

    Fundamental objective of MDM: Enable the business to see one view of critical data elements across the organization.

    Phases of the MDM Framework. 'Phase 1: Build a Vision for MDM' entails a 'Readiness Assessment', then both 'Identify the Master Data Needs of the Business' and 'Create a Strategic Vision'. 'Phase 2: Create a Plan and Roadmap for the Organization’s MDM Program' entails 'Assess Current MDM Capabilities', then 'Initiative Planning', then 'Strategic Roadmap'.

    What is MDM and why is it needed?

    • Master data management (MDM) “entails control over Master Data values and identifiers that enable consistent use, across systems, of the most accurate and timely data about essential business entities” (DAMA, 2017).
    • The fundamental objective of MDM is to enable the business to see one view of critical data elements across the organization.
    • What is included in the scope of MDM?
      • Party data (employees, customers, etc.)
      • Product/service data
      • Financial data
      • Location data

    Is there traceability and visibility into your data’s lineage? Does your data pipeline facilitate that single view across the organization?

    Who:

    This research is designed for:

    • Chief Data Officer (CDO)
    • Head of Data Management, CIO
    • Data Architect
    • Head of Data Governance, Data Officer

    Info-Tech Insight

    Successful MDM requires a comprehensive approach. To be successfully planned, implemented, and maintained it must include effective capabilities in the critical processes and subpractices of data management.

    Data Modeling Framework

    • The framework consists of the business, enterprise, application, and implementation layers.
    • The Business Layer encodes real-world business concepts via the conceptual model.
    • The Enterprise Layer defines all enterprise data asset details and their relationships.
    • The Application Layer defines the data structures as used by a specific application.
    • The Implementation Layer defines the data models and artifacts for use by software tools.
    Data Modeling Framework with items from the 'Implementation Layer' contributing to items in the 'Application Layer' and 'Enterprise Layer' before turning into a 'Conceptual Model' in the 'Business Layer'.

    Model hierarchy

    • The Conceptual data model describes the organization from a business perspective.
    • The Message model is used to describe internal- and external-facing messages and is equivalent to the canonical model.
    • The Enterprise model depicts the whole organization and is divided into domains.
    • The Analytical model is built for specific business use cases.
    • Application models are application-specific operational models.
    Model hierarchy with items from the 'Implementation Layer' contributing to items in the 'Application Layer' and 'Enterprise Layer' before turning into a 'Conceptual Model' in the 'Business Layer'.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The Conceptual model acts as the root of all the models required and used by an organization.

    Data architecture and modeling processes

    A diagram moving from right to left through 5 phases: 'Business concepts defined and organized', 'Business concepts enriched with attribution', 'Physical view of the data, still vendor agnostic', 'The view being used by developers and business', and 'Manage the progression of your data assets'.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The Conceptual data model adds relationships to your business data glossary terms and is the first step of the modeling journey.

    Data operations

    Objectives of Data Operations Management

    • Implement and follow policies and procedures to manage data at each stage of its lifecycle.
    • Maintain the technology supporting the flow and delivery of data (applications, databases, systems, etc.).
    • Control the delivery of data within the system environment.

    Indicators of Successful Data Operations Management

    • Effective delivery of data assets to end users.
    • Successful maintenance and performance of the technical environment that collects, stores, delivers, and purges organizational data.
    'Data Lifecycle' with steps 'Create', 'Acquire', 'Store', 'Maintain', 'Use', and 'Archive/Destroy'.
    This data management enabler has a heavy focus on the management and performance of data systems and applications.
    It works closely with the organization’s technical architecture to support successful data delivery and lifecycle management (data warehouses, repositories, databases, networks, etc.).

    Step 1.2

    Understand and Align to Business Drivers

    Activities

    1.2.1 Define your value streams

    1.2.2 Identify your business capabilities

    1.2.3 Categorize your organization’s key business capabilities

    1.2.4 Develop a strategy map tied to data management

    This step will guide you through the following activities:

    • Leverage your organization’s existing business capability map or initiate the formulation of a business capability map.
    • Determine which business capabilities are considered high priority by your organization.
    • Map your organization’s strategic objectives to value streams and capabilities to communicate how objectives are realized with the support of data.

    Outcomes of this step

    • A foundation for data management initiative planning that’s aligned with the organization’s business architecture: value streams, business capability map, and strategy map

    Build Business Context and Drivers

    Step 1.1 Step 1.2 Step 1.3 Step 1.4

    Identifying value streams

    Value streams connect business goals to organization’s value realization activities. They enable an organization to create and capture value in the marketplace by engaging in a set of interconnected activities.
    There are several key questions to ask when endeavouring to identify value streams.

    Key Questions

    • Who are your customers?
    • What are the benefits we deliver to them?
    • How do we deliver those benefits?
    • How does the customer receive the benefits?

    1.2.1 Define value streams

    1-3 hours

    Input: Business strategy/goals, Financial statements, Info-Tech’s industry-specific business architecture

    Output: List of organization-specific value streams, Detailed value stream definition(s)

    Materials: Whiteboard/kanban board, Info-Tech’s Reference Architecture Template – contact your Account Representative for details, Other industry standard reference architecture models: BIZBOK, APQC, etc., Info-Tech’s Archimate models

    Participants: Enterprise/Business Architect, Business Analysts, Business Unit Leads, CIO, Departmental Executive & Senior managers

    Unify the organization’s perspective on how it creates value.

    1. Write a short description of the value stream that includes a statement about the value provided and a clear start and end for the value stream. Validate the accuracy of the descriptions with your key stakeholders.
    2. Consider:
      • How does the organization deliver those benefits?
      • How does the customer receive the benefits?
      • What is the scope of your value stream? What will trigger the stream to start and what will the final value be?
    3. Avoid:
      • Don’t start with a blank page. Use Info-Tech’s business architecture models for sample value streams.

    Contact your Account Representative for access to Info-Tech’s Reference Architecture Template

    Define or validate the organization’s value streams

    Value streams connect business goals to the organization’s value realization activities. These value realization activities, in turn, depend on data.

    If the organization does not have a business architecture function to conduct and guide Activity 1.2.1, you can leverage the following approach:

    • Meet with key stakeholders regarding this topic, then discuss and document your findings.
    • When trying to identify the right stakeholders, consider: Who are the decision makers and key influencers? Who will impact this piece of business architecture–related work? Who has the relevant skills, competencies, experience, and knowledge about the organization?
    • Engage with these stakeholders to define and validate how the organization creates value. Consider:
      • Who are your main stakeholders? This will depend on the industry in which you operate. For example, they could be customers, residents, citizens, constituents, students, patients.
      • What are your stakeholders looking to accomplish?
      • How does your organization’s products and/or services help them accomplish that?
      • What are the benefits your organization delivers to them and how does your organization deliver those benefits?
      • How do your stakeholders receive those benefits?

    Align data management to the organization’s value realization activities.

    Value streams enable the organization to create or capture value in the market in which it operates by engaging in a set of interconnected activities.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Your organization’s value streams and the associated business capabilities require effectively managed and governed data. Without this, you could face elevated operational costs, missed opportunities, eroded stakeholder satisfaction, negative impact to reputation and brand, and/or increased exposure to business risk.

    Example of value streams – Retail Banking

    Value streams connect business goals to the organization’s value realization activities.

    Example value stream descriptions for: Retail Banking

    Value streams enable the organization to create or capture value in the market in which it operates by engaging in a set of interconnected activities. Example Value Stream for Retail Banking with five value chains. 'Attract Customers: Retail banks design new products to fill gaps in their product portfolios by analyzing the market for changing customer needs and new competitor offerings or pricing; Pricing a product correctly through analysis and rate setting is a delicate balance and fundamental to a bank’s success.' 'Supply Loans and Mortgages and Credit Cards: Selecting lending criteria helps banks decide on the segment of customer they should take on and the degree of risk they are willing to accept.' 'Provide Core Banking Services: Servicing includes the day-to-day interactions with customers for onboarding, payments, adjustments, and offboarding through multiple banking channels; Customer retention and growing share of wallet are crucial capabilities in servicing that directly impact the growth and profitability of retail banks.' 'Offer Card Services: Card servicing involves quick turnarounds on card delivery and acceptance at a large number of merchants; Accurate billing and customizable spending alerts are crucial in ensuring that the customer understands their spending habits.' 'Grow Investments and Manage Wealth: Customer retention can be increased through effective wealth management and additional services that will increase the number of products owned by a customer.'

    For this value stream, download Info-Tech’s Industry Reference Architecture for Retail Banking.

    Example of value streams – Higher Education

    Value streams connect business goals to the organization’s value realization activities.

    Example value stream descriptions for: Higher Education

    Value streams enable the organization to create or capture value in the market in which it operates by engaging in a set of interconnected activities. Example Value Stream for Higher Education with five value chains. 'Shape Institutional Research: Institutional research provides direct benefits to both partners and faculty, ensuring efficient use of resources and compliance with ethical and methodological standards; This value stream involves all components of the research lifecycle, from planning and resourcing to delivery and commercialization.' 'Facilitate Curriculum Design: Curriculum design is the process by which learning content is designed and developed to achieve desired student outcomes; Curriculum management capabilities include curriculum planning, design and commercialization, curriculum assessment, and instruction management.' 'Design Student Support Services: Support services design and development provides a range of resources to assist students with academic success, such as accessibility, health and counseling, social services, housing, and academic skills development.' 'Manage Academic Administration: Academic administration involves the broad capabilities required to attract and enroll students in institutional programs; This value stream involves all components related to recruitment, enrollment, admissions, and retention management.' 'Deliver Student Services: Delivery of student services comes after curricular management, support services design, and academic administration. It comprises delivery of programs and services to enable student success; Program and service delivery capabilities include curriculum delivery, convocation management, and student and alumni support services.'

    For this value stream, download Info-Tech’s Industry Reference Architecture for Higher Education.

    Example of value streams – Local Government

    Value streams connect business goals to the organization’s value realization activities.

    Example value stream descriptions for: Local Government

    Value streams enable the organization to create or capture value in the market in which it operates by engaging in a set of interconnected activities. Example Value Stream for Local Government with five value chains. 'Sustain Land, Property, and the Environment: Local governments act as the stewards of the regional land and environment that are within their boundaries; Regional government bodies are responsible for ensuring that the natural environment is protected and sustained for future citizens in the form of parks and public land.' 'Facilitate Civic Engagement: Local governments engage with constituents to maintain a high quality of life through art, culture, and education.' 'Protect Local Health and Safety: Health concerns are managed by a local government through specialized campaigns and clinics; Emergency services are provided by the local authority to protect and react to health and safety concerns including police and firefighting services.' 'Grow the Economy: Economic growth is a cornerstone of a strong local government. Growth comes from flourishing industries, entrepreneurial success, high levels of employment, and income from tourism.' 'Provide Regional Infrastructure: Local governments ensure that infrastructure is built, maintained, and effective in meeting the needs of constituents. (Includes: electricity, water, sustainable energy sources, waste collection, transit, and local transportation.'

    For this value stream, download Info-Tech’s Industry Reference Architecture for Local Government.

    Example of value streams – Manufacturing

    Value streams connect business goals to the organization’s value realization activities.

    Example value stream descriptions for: Manufacturing

    Value streams enable the organization to create or capture value in the market in which it operates by engaging in a set of interconnected activities. Example Value Stream for Manufacturing with three value chains. 'Design Product: Manufacturers proactively analyze their respective markets for any new opportunities or threats; They design new products to serve changing customer needs or to rival any new offerings by competitors; A manufacturer’s success depends on its ability to develop a product that the market wants at the right price and quality level.' 'Produce Product: Optimizing production activities is an important capability for manufacturers. Raw materials and working inventories need to be managed effectively to minimize wastage and maximize the utilization of the production lines; Processes need to be refined continuously over time to remain competitive and the quality of the materials and final products needs to be strictly managed.' 'Sell Product: Once produced, manufacturers need to sell the products. This is done through distributors, retailers, and, in some cases, directly to the end consumer; After the sale, manufacturers typically have to deliver the product, provide customer care, and manage complaints; Manufacturers also randomly test their end products to ensure they meet quality requirements.'

    For this value stream, download Info-Tech’s Industry Reference Architecture for Manufacturing.

    Define the organization’s business capabilities in a business capability map

    A business capability defines what a business does to enable value creation. Business capabilities represent stable business functions and typically will have a defined business outcome.

    Business capabilities can be thought of as business terms defined using descriptive nouns such as “Marketing” or “Research and Development.”

    If your organization doesn’t already have a business capability map, you can leverage the following approach to build one. This initiative requires a good understanding of the business. By working with the right stakeholders, you can develop a business capability map that speaks a common language and accurately depicts your business.

    Working with the stakeholders as described in the slide entitled “Define or validate the organization’s value streams”:

    • Analyze the value streams to identify and describe the organization’s capabilities that support them.
    • Consider the objective of your value stream. (This can highlight which capabilities support which value stream.)
    • As you initiate your engagement with your stakeholders, don’t start a blank page. Leverage the examples on the next slides as a starting point for your business capability map.
    • When using these examples, consider: What are the activities that make up your particular business? Keep the ones that apply to your organization, remove the ones that don’t, and add any needed.

    Align data management to the organization’s value realization activities.

    Info-Tech Insight

    A business capability map can be thought of as a visual representation of your organization’s business capabilities and hence represents a view of what your data management program must support.

    For more information, refer to Info-Tech’s Document Your Business Architecture.

    1.2.2 Identify your business capabilities

    Input: List of confirmed value streams and their related business capabilities

    Output: Business capability map with value streams for your organization

    Materials: Your existing business capability map, Business Alignment worksheet provided in the Data Management Assessment and Planning Tool, Info-Tech’s Document Your Business Architecture blueprint

    Participants: Key business stakeholders, Data stewards, Data custodians, Data leads and administrators

    Confirm your organization's existing business capability map or initiate the formulation of a business capability map:

    • If you have an existing business capability map, meet with the relevant business owners/stakeholders to confirm that the content is accurate and up to date. Confirm the value streams (how your organization creates and captures value) and their business capabilities reflect the organization’s current business environment.
    • If you do not have an existing business capability map, complete this activity to initiate the formulation of a map (value streams and related business capabilities):
      1. Define the organization’s value streams. Meet with senior leadership and other key business stakeholders to define how your organization creates and captures value.
      2. Define the relevant business capabilities. Meet with senior leadership and other key business stakeholders to define the business capabilities.

    Note: A business capability defines what a business does to enable value creation. Business capabilities are business terms defined using nouns such as “Marketing” or “Research and Development.” They represent stable business functions, are unique and independent of one another, and typically will have a defined business outcome.

    Example business capability map – Retail Banking

    A business capability map can be thought of as a visual representation of your organization’s business capabilities and hence represents a view of what your data governance program must support.

    Validate your business capability map with the right stakeholders, including your executive team, business unit leaders, and/or other key stakeholders.

    Info-Tech Tip: Leverage your business capability map verification session with these key stakeholders as a prime opportunity to share and explain the role of data and data governance in supporting the very value realization capabilities under discussion. This will help to build awareness and visibility of the data management program.

    Example business capability map for: Retail Banking

    Example business capability map for Retail Banking with value stream items as column headers, and rows 'Enabling', 'Shared', and 'Defining'.

    For this business capability map, download Info-Tech’s Industry Reference Architecture for Retail Banking.

    Example business capability map – Higher Education

    A business capability map can be thought of as a visual representation of your organization’s business capabilities and hence represents a view of what your data governance program must support.

    Validate your business capability map with the right stakeholders, including your executive team, business unit leaders, and/or other key stakeholders.

    Info-Tech Tip: Leverage your business capability map verification session with these key stakeholders as a prime opportunity to share and explain the role of data and data governance in supporting the very value realization capabilities under discussion. This will help to build awareness and visibility of the data management program.

    Example business capability map for: Higher Education

    Example business capability map for Higher Education with value stream items as column headers, and rows 'Enabling', 'Shared', and 'Defining'.

    For this business capability map, download Info-Tech’s Industry Reference Architecture for Higher Education.

    Example business capability map – Local Government

    A business capability map can be thought of as a visual representation of your organization’s business capabilities and hence represents a view of what your data governance program must support.

    Validate your business capability map with the right stakeholders, including your executive team, business unit leaders, and/or other key stakeholders.

    Info-Tech Tip: Leverage your business capability map verification session with these key stakeholders as a prime opportunity to share and explain the role of data and data governance in supporting the very value realization capabilities under discussion. This will help to build awareness and visibility of the data governance program.

    Example business capability map for: Local Government

    Example business capability map for Local Government with value stream items as column headers, and rows 'Enabling', 'Shared', and 'Defining'.

    For this business capability map, download Info-Tech’s Industry Reference Architecture for Local Government.

    Example business capability map – Manufacturing

    A business capability map can be thought of as a visual representation of your organization’s business capabilities and hence represents a view of what your data governance program must support.

    Validate your business capability map with the right stakeholders, including your executive team, business unit leaders, and/or other key stakeholders.

    Info-Tech Tip: Leverage your business capability map verification session with these key stakeholders as a prime opportunity to share and explain the role of data and data governance in supporting the very value realization capabilities under discussion. This will help to build awareness and visibility of the data governance program.

    Example business capability map for: Manufacturing

    Example business capability map for Manufacturing with value stream items as column headers, and rows 'Enabling', 'Shared', and 'Defining'.

    For this business capability map, download Info-Tech’s Industry Reference Architecture for Manufacturing.

    Example business capability map – Retail

    A business capability map can be thought of as a visual representation of your organization’s business capabilities and hence represents a view of what your data governance program must support.

    Validate your business capability map with the right stakeholders, including your executive team, business unit leaders, and/or other key stakeholders.

    Info-Tech Tip: Leverage your business capability map verification session with these key stakeholders as a prime opportunity to share and explain the role of data and data governance in supporting the very value realization capabilities under discussion. This will help to build awareness and visibility of the data governance program.

    Example business capability map for: Retail

    Example business capability map for Retail with value stream items as column headers, and rows 'Enabling', 'Shared', and 'Defining'.

    For this business capability map, download Info-Tech’s Industry Reference Architecture for Retail.

    1.2.3 Categorize your organization’s key capabilities

    Input: Strategic insight from senior business stakeholders on the business capabilities that drive value for the organization

    Output: Business capabilities categorized and prioritized (e.g. cost advantage creators, competitive advantage differentiators, high value/high risk) See next slide for an example

    Materials: Your existing business capability map or the business capability map derived in Activity 1.2.2

    Participants: Key business stakeholders, Data stewards, Data custodians, Data governance working group

    Determine which capabilities are considered high priority in your organization.

    1. Categorize or heatmap the organization’s key capabilities. Consult with senior and other key business stakeholders to categorize and prioritize the business’ capabilities. This will aid in ensuring your data governance future-state planning is aligned with the mandate of the business. One approach to prioritizing capabilities with business stakeholders is to examine them through the lens of cost advantage creators, competitive advantage differentiators, and/or by high value/high risk.
    2. Identify cost advantage creators. Focus on capabilities that drive a cost advantage for your organization. Highlight these capabilities and prioritize programs that support them.
    3. Identify competitive advantage differentiators. Focus on capabilities that give your organization an edge over rivals or other players in your industry.

    This categorization/prioritization exercise helps highlight prime areas of opportunity for building use cases, determining prioritization, and the overall optimization of data and data governance.

    For more information, refer to Info-Tech’s Document Your Business Architecture.

    Example of business capabilities categorization or heatmapping – Retail

    This exercise is useful in ensuring the data governance program is focused and aligned to support the priorities and direction of the business.

    • Depending on the mandate from the business, priority may be on developing cost advantage. Hence the capabilities that deliver efficiency gains are the ones considered to be cost advantage creators.
    • The business’ priority may be on maintaining or gaining a competitive advantage over its industry counterparts. Differentiation might be achieved in delivering unique or enhanced products, services, and/or experiences, and the focus will tend to be on the capabilities that are more end-stakeholder-facing (e.g. customer-, student-, patient,- and/or constituent-facing). These are the organization’s competitive advantage creators.

    Example: Retail

    Example business capability map for Retail with capabilities categorized into Cost Advantage Creators and Competitive Advantage creators via a legend. Value stream items as column headers, and rows 'Enabling', 'Shared', and 'Defining'.

    For this business capability map, download Info-Tech’s Industry Reference Architecture for Retail.

    1.2.4 Develop a strategy map tied to data management

    Input: Strategic objectives as outlined by the organization’s business strategy and confirmed by senior leaders

    Output: A strategy map that maps your organizational strategic objectives to value streams, business capabilities, and ultimately data programs

    Materials: Your existing business capability map or the one created in Activity 1.2.2, Business strategy (see next slide for an example)

    Participants: Key business stakeholders, Data stewards, Data custodians, Data governance working group

    Identify the strategic objectives for the business. Knowing the key strategic objectives will drive business–data governance alignment. It’s important to make sure the right strategic objectives of the organization have been identified and are well understood.

    1. Meet with senior business leaders and other relevant stakeholders to help identify and document the key strategic objectives for the business.
    2. Leverage their knowledge of the organization’s business strategy and strategic priorities to visually represent how these map to value streams, business capabilities, and ultimately data and data governance needs and initiatives. Tip: Your map is one way to visually communicate and link the business strategy to other levels of the organization.
    3. Confirm the strategy mapping with other relevant stakeholders.

    Example of a strategy map tied to data management

    • Strategic objectives are the outcomes the organization is looking to achieve.
    • Value streams enable an organization to create and capture value in the market through interconnected activities that support strategic objectives.
    • Business capabilities define what a business does to enable value creation in value streams.
    • Data capabilities and initiatives are descriptions of action items on the data and data governance roadmap that will enable one or multiple business capabilities in its desired target state.

    Info-Tech Tip: Start with the strategic objectives, then map the value streams that will ultimately drive them. Next, link the key capabilities that enable each value stream. Then map the data and data governance initiatives that support those capabilities. This process will help you prioritize the data initiatives that deliver the most value to the organization.

    Example: Retail

    Example of a strategy map tied to data management with diagram column headers 'Strategic Objectives' (are realized through...) 'Value Streams' (are enabled by...) 'Key Capabilities' (are driven by...) 'Data Capabilities and Initiatives'. Row headers are objectives and fields are composed of three examples of each column header.

    For this strategy map, download Info-Tech’s Industry Reference Architecture for Retail.

    Step 1.3

    Build High-Value Use Cases for Data Management

    Activities

    1.3.1 Build high-value use cases

    This step will guide you through the following activities:

    • Understand the main disciplines and makeup of a best-practice data management program.
    • Determine which data management capabilities are considered high priority by your organization.

    Outcomes of this step

    • A foundation for data management initiative planning that’s aligned with the organization’s business architecture: value streams, business capability map, and strategy map

    Build Business Context and Drivers

    Step 1.1 Step 1.2 Step 1.3 Step 1.4

    1.3.1 Build high-value use cases

    Input: Value streams and business capabilities as defined by business leaders, Business stakeholders’ subject area expertise, Data custodian systems, integration, and data knowledge

    Output: Use cases that articulate data-related challenges, needs, or opportunities that are tied to defined business capabilities and hence, if addressed, will deliver measurable value to the organization

    Materials: Your business capability map from Activity 1.2.2, Info-Tech’s Data Use Case Framework Template, Whiteboard or flip charts (or shared screen if working remotely), Markers/pens

    Participants: Key business stakeholders, Data stewards and business SMEs, Data custodians, Data leads and administrators

    This business needs gathering activity will highlight and create relevant use cases around data-related problems or opportunities that are clear and contained and, if addressed, will deliver value to the organization.

    1. Bring together key business stakeholders (data owner, stewards, SMEs) from a particular line of business as well the relevant data custodian(s) to build cases for their units. Leverage the business capability map you created for facilitating this act.
    2. Leverage Info-Tech’s Data Use Case Framework Template as seen on the next slide.
    3. Have the stakeholders move through each breakout session outlined in the use case worksheet. Use flip charts or a whiteboard to brainstorm and document their thoughts.
    4. Debrief and document results in the Data Use Case Framework Template.
    5. Repeat this exercise with as many lines of the business as possible, leveraging your business capability map to guide your progress and align with business value.

    Tip: Don’t conclude these use case discussions without substantiating what measures of success will be used to demonstrate the business value of the effort to produce the desired future state, as relevant to each particular use case.

    Download Info-Tech’s Data Use Case Framework Template

    Data use cases

    Sample Data

    The following is the list of use cases as articulated by key stakeholders at [Organization Name].

    The stakeholders see these as areas that are relevant and highly valuable for delivering strategic value to [Organization Name].

    Use Case 1: Customer/Student/Patient/Resident 360 View

    Use Case 2: Project/Department Financial Performance

    Use Case 3: Vendor Lifecycle Management

    Use Case 4: Project Risk Management

    Prioritization of use cases

    Example table for use case prioritization. Column headers are 'Use Case', 'Order of Priority', and 'Comments'. Fields are empty.

    Use case 1

    Sample Data

    Problem statement:

    • We are not realizing our full growth potential because we do not have a unified 360 view of our customers/clients/[name of external stakeholder].
    • This impacts: our cross-selling; upselling; talent acquisition and retention; quality of delivery; ability to identify and deliver the right products, markets, and services...

    If we could solve this:

    • We would be able to better prioritize and position ourselves to meet evolving customer needs.
    • We would be able to optimize the use of our limited resources.

    Use case 1: challenges, risks, and opportunities

    Sample Data

    1. What is the number one risk you need to alleviate?
      • Loss of potential revenue, whether from existing or net new customers.
        • How?
          • By not maximizing opportunities with customers or even by losing customers; by not understanding or addressing their greatest needs
          • By not being able to win potential new customers because we don’t understand their needs
    2. What is the number one opportunity you wish to see happen?
      • The ability to better understand and anticipate the needs of both existing and potential customers.
    3. What is the number one pain point you have when working with data?
      • I can’t do my job with confidence because it’s not based on comprehensive, sound, reliable data. My group spends significant time reconciling data sets with little time left for data use and analysis.
    4. What are your challenges in performing the activity today?
      • I cannot pull together customer data in a timely manner due to having a high level of dependence on specific individuals with institutional knowledge rather than having easy access to information.
      • It takes too much time and effort to pull together what we know about a customer.
      • The necessary data is not consolidated or readily/systematically available for consumption.
      • These challenges are heightened when dealing with customers across markets.

    Use case 1 (cont'd)

    Sample Data

    1. What does “amazing” look like if we solve this perfectly?
      • Employees have immediate, self-service access to necessary information, leading to better and more timely decisions. This results in stronger business and financial growth.
    2. What other business unit activities/processes will be impacted/improved if we solve this?
      • Marketing/bid and proposal, staffing, procurement, and contracting strategy
    3. What compliance/regulatory/policy concerns do we need to consider in any solution?
      • PII, GDPR, HIPAA, CCPA, etc.
    4. What measures of success/change should we use to prove the value of the effort (KPIs/ROI)?
      • Win rate, number of services per customer, gross profit, customer retention, customer satisfaction scores, brand awareness, and net promoter score
    5. What are the steps in the process/activity today?
      • Manual aggregation (i.e. pull data from systems into Excel), reliance on unwritten knowledge, seeking IT support, canned reports

    Use case 1 (cont'd)

    Sample Data

    1. What are the applications/systems used at each step?
      • Salesforce CRM, Excel, personal MS Access databases, SharePoint
    2. What data elements (domains) are involved, created, used, or transformed at each step?
      • Bid and proposal information, customer satisfaction, forecast data, list of products, corporate entity hierarchy, vendor information, key staffing, recent and relevant news, and competitor intelligence

    Use case worksheet

    Objective: This business needs gathering activity will help you highlight and create relevant use cases around data-related problems or opportunities. They should be clear and contained and, if addressed, will deliver value to the organization.

    1.

    What business capability (or capabilities) in your business area is this use case tied to?

    Examples: Demand Planning, Assortment Planning, Allocation & Replenishment, Fulfillment Planning, Customer Management
    2.

    What are your data-related challenges in performing this today?

    Use case worksheet (cont’d.)

    Objective: This business needs gathering activity will help you highlight and create relevant use cases around data-related problems or opportunities. They should be clear and contained and, if addressed, will deliver value to the organization.

    3.

    What are the steps in the process/activity today?

    4.

    What are the applications/systems used at each step today?

    5.

    What data domains are involved, created, used, or transformed at each step today?

    Use case worksheet (cont’d.)

    Objective: This business needs gathering activity will help you highlight and create relevant use cases around data-related problems or opportunities. They should be clear and contained and, if addressed, will deliver value to the organization.

    6.

    What does an ideal or improved state look like?

    7.

    What other business units, business capabilities, activities, or processes will be impacted and/or improved if this were to be solved?

    8.

    Who are the stakeholders impacted by these changes? Who needs to be consulted?

    9.

    What are the risks to the organization (business capability, revenue, reputation, customer loyalty, etc.) if this is not addressed?

    Use case worksheet (cont’d.)

    Objective: This business needs gathering activity will help you highlight and create relevant use cases around data-related problems or opportunities. They should be clear and contained and, if addressed, will deliver value to the organization.

    10.

    What compliance, regulatory, or policy concerns do we need to consider in any solution?

    11.

    What measures of success or change should we use to prove the value of the effort (KPIs/ROI)? What is the measurable business value of doing this?

    Use case worksheet (cont’d.)

    Objective: This business needs gathering activity will help you highlight and create relevant use cases around data-related problems or opportunities. They should be clear and contained and, if addressed, will deliver value to the organization.

    10.

    Conclusion: What are the data capabilities that need to be optimized, addressed, or improved to support or help realize the business capability (or capabilities) highlighted in this use case?

    (Tip: This will inform your future-state data capabilities optimization planning and roadmapping activities.)

    Data Management Workshop
    Use Case 1: Covid-19 Emergency Management

    [SAMPLE]

    Problem Statement

    Inability to provide insights to DPH due to inconsistent data, inaccurate reporting, missing governance, and unknown data sources resulting in decisions that impact citizens being made without accurate information.

    Challenges
    • Data is not suitable for analytics. It takes lot of effort to clean data.
    • Data intervals are not correct and other data quality issues.
    • The roles are not clearly defined.
    • Lack of communication between key stakeholders.
    • Inconsistent data/reporting/governance in the agencies. This has resulted in number of issues for Covid-19 emergency management. Not able to report accurately on number of cases, deaths, etc.
    • Data collection systems changed overtime (forms, etc.).
    • GIS has done all the reporting. However, why GIS is doing all the reporting is not clear. GIS provides critical information for location. Reason: GIS was ready with reporting solution ArcGIS.
    • Problem with data collection, consolidation, and providing hierarchical view.
    • Change in requirements, metrics – managing crisis by email and resulting in creating one dashboard after another. Not sure whether these dashboards being used.
    • There is a lot of manual intervention and repeated work.
    What Does Amazing Look Like?
    • One set of dashboards (or single dashboard) – too much time spend on measure development
    • Accurate and timely data
    • Automated data
    • Access to granular data (for researchers and other stakeholders)
    • Clear ownership of data and analytics
    • It would have been nice to have governance already prior to this crisis
    • Proper metrics to measure usage and value
    • Give more capabilities such as predictive analytics, etc.
    Related Processes/Impact
    • DPH
    • Schools
    • Business
    • Citizens
    • Resources & Funding
    • Data Integration & GIS
    • Data Management
    • Automated Data Quality
    Compliance
    • HIPAA, FERPA, CJIS, IRS
    • FEMA
    • State compliance requirement – data classification
    • CDC
    • Federal data-sharing agreements/restrictions
    Benefits/KPIs
    • Reduction in cases
    • Timely response to outbreak
    • Better use of resources
    • Economic impact
    • Educational benefits
    • Trust and satisfaction

    Data Management Workshop
    Use Case 1: Covid-19 Emergency Management

    [SAMPLE]

    Problem Statement

    Inability to provide insights to DPH due to inconsistent data, inaccurate reporting, missing governance, and unknown data sources resulting in decisions that impact citizens being made without accurate information.

    Current Steps in Process Activity (Systems)
    1. Collect data through Survey123 using ArcGIS (hospitals are managed to report by 11 am) – owned KYEM
    2. KYEM stores this information/data
    3. Deduplicate data (emergency preparedness group)
    4. Generate dashboard using ArcGIS
    5. Map to monitor status of the update
    6. Error correction using web portal (QAQC)
    7. Download Excel/CVS after all 97 hospital reports
    8. Sent to federal platform (White House, etc.)
    9. Generate reports for epidemiologist (done manually for public reporting)
    Data Flow diagram

    Data flow diagram.

    SystemsData Management Dimensions
    1. Data Governance
    2. Data Quality
    3. Data Integrity
    4. Data Integration
    1. Data Architecture
    2. Metadata
    3. Data Warehouse, Reporting & Analytics
    4. Data Security

    Data Management Workshop
    Use Case 1: Covid-19 Emergency Management

    [SAMPLE]

    Problem Statement

    Inability to provide insights to DPH due to inconsistent data, inaccurate reporting, missing governance, and unknown data sources resulting in decisions that impact citizens being made without accurate information.

    List Future Process Steps

    Prior to COVID-19 Emergency Response:

    • ArcGIS data integrated available in data warehouse/data lake.
    • KYEM data integrated and available in data warehouse/data lake.
    • CHFS data integrated and available in data warehouse/data lake.
    • Reporting standards and tools framework established.

    After COVID-19 Emergency Response:

    • Collect data through Survey123 using ArcGIS (hospitals are managed to report by 11 am) – owned KYEM.
    • Error correction using web portal (QAQC).
    • Generate reports/dashboard/files as per reporting/analytical requirements:
      • Federal reporting
      • COVID dashboards
      • Epidemiologist reports
      • Lab reporting
    Future Process and Data Flow

    Data flow diagram with future processes.

    Step 1.4

    Create a Vision and Guiding Principles for Data Management

    Activities

    1.4.1 Craft a vision

    1.4.2 Create guiding principles

    This step will guide you through the following activities:

    • Leverage your organization’s existing business capability map or initiate the formulation of a business capability map, guided by info-Tech’s approach.
    • Determine which business capabilities are considered high priority by your organization.
    • Map your organization’s strategic objectives to value streams and capabilities to communicate how objectives are realized with the support of data.

    Outcomes of this step

    • A foundation for data management initiative planning that’s aligned with the organization’s business architecture: value streams, business capability map, and strategy map

    Build Business Context and Drivers

    Step 1.1 Step 1.2 Step 1.3 Step 1.4

    1.4.1 Craft a vision

    Input: Organizational vision and mission statements, Stakeholder survey results and elicitation findings, Use cases, Business and data capability map

    Output: Vision and mission statements

    Materials: Markers and pens, Whiteboard, Online whiteboard, Vision samples and templates

    Participants: Key business stakeholders, Data managers, Data owners, Business leads and SMEs, Project team, Project sponsor

    Complete the vision statement to set the direction, the “why,” for the changes we’re making. The vision is a reference point that should galvanize everyone in the organization and set guardrails for technical and process decisions to follow.

    1. Bring together key business stakeholders (content owners, SMEs, and relevant IT custodians) to craft a data management vision statement.
    2. Start by brainstorming keywords, such as customer-focused, empower the business, service excellence, findable and manageable, protected, accessible, paperless.
    3. Highlight the keywords that resonate most with the group. Refer to example vision statements for ideas.

    Create a common data management vision that is consistently communicated to the organization

    A data management program should be an enterprise-wide initiative.

    • To create a strong vision for data management, there must be participation from the business and IT. A common vision will articulate the state the organization wishes to achieve and how it will reach that state. Visioning helps to develop long-term goals and direction.
    • Once the vision is established, it must be effectively communicated to everyone, especially those who are involved in creating, managing, disposing, or archiving data.
    • The data management program should be periodically refined. This will ensure the organization continues to incorporate best methods and practices as the organization grows and data needs evolve.
    Stock image of a megaphone with multiple icons pouring from its opening.

    Info-Tech Tips

    • Use information from the stakeholder interviews to derive business goals and objectives.
    • Work to integrate different opinions and perspectives into the overall vision for data management.
    • Brainstorm guiding principles for content and understand the overall value to the organization.

    Create compelling vision and mission statements for the organization’s future data management practice

    A vision represents the way your organization intends to be in the future.

    A clear vision statement helps align the entire organization to the same end goal.

    Your vision should be brief, concise, and inspirational; it is attempting to say a lot in a few words, so be very thoughtful and careful with the words you choose. Consider your strengths across departments – business and IT, the consumers of your services, and your current/future commitments to service quality.

    Remember that a vision statement is internally facing for other members of your company throughout the process.

    A mission expresses why you exist.

    While your vision is a declaration of where your organization aspires to be in the future, your mission statement should communicate the fundamental purpose of the data management practice.

    It identifies the function of the practice, what it produces, and its high-level goals that are linked to delivering timely, high-quality, relevant, and valuable data to business processes and end users. Consider if the practice is responsible for providing data for analytical and/or operational use cases.

    A mission statement should be a concise and clear statement of purpose for both internal and external stakeholders.

    “The Vision is the What, Where or Who you want the company to become. The Mission is the WHY the company exists, it is your purpose, passion or cause.” (Doug Meyer-Cuno, Forbes, 2021)

    Data Management Vision and Mission Statements: Draft

    Vision and mission statements crafted by the workshop participants. These statements are to be reviewed, refined into a single version, approved by members of the senior leadership team, and then communicated to the wider organization.

    Corporate

    Group 1

    Group 2

    Vision:
    Create and maintain an institution of world-class excellence.
    Vision: Vision:
    Mission:
    Foster an economic and financial environment conducive to sustainable economic growth and development.
    Mission: Mission:

    Information management framework

    The information management framework is a way to organize all the ECM program’s guidelines and artifacts

    Information management framework with 'Information Management Vision' above six principles. Below them are 'Information Management Policies' and 'Information Management Standards and Procedures.'

    The vision is a statement about the organization’s goals and provides a basis to guide decisions and rally employees toward a shared goal.

    The principles or themes communicate the organization’s priorities for its information management program.

    Policies are a set of official guidelines that determine a course of action. For example: Company is committed to safety for its employees.

    Procedures are a set of actions for doing something. For example: Company employees will wear protective gear while on the production floor.

    Craft your vision

    Use the insights you gathered from users and stakeholders to develop a vision statement
    • The beginning of a data management practice is a clear set of goals and key performance indicators (KPIs).
      A good set of goals takes time and input from senior leadership and stakeholders.
    • The data management program lead is selling a compelling vision of what is possible.
    • The vision also helps set the scope and expectations about what the data management program lead is and is not doing.
    • Be realistic about what you can do and how long it will take to see a difference.
    Table comparing the talk (mission statements, vision statements, and values) with the walk (strategies/goals, objectives, and tactical plans). Example vision statements:
    • The organization is dedicated to creating an enabling structure that helps the organization get the right information to the right people at the right time.
    • The organization is dedicated to creating a program that recognizes data as an asset, establishing a data-centric culture, and ensuring data quality and accessibility to achieve service excellence.
    The vision should be short, memorable, inspirational and draw a clear picture of what that future-state data management experience looks like.

    Is it modern and high end, with digital self-service?

    Is it a trusted and transparent steward of customer assets?

    1.4.2 Create guiding principles

    Input: Sample data management guiding principles, Stakeholder survey results and elicitation findings, Use cases, Business and data capability map

    Output: Data management guiding principles

    Materials: Markers and pens, Whiteboard, Online whiteboard, Guiding principles samples and templates

    Participants: Key business stakeholders, Data managers, Data owners, Business leads and SMEs, Project team, Project sponsor

    Draft a set of guiding principles that express your program’s values as a framework for decisions and actions and keep the data strategy alive.

    1. Bring together key business stakeholders (data owners, SMEs, and relevant IT custodians) to craft a set of data management guiding principles.
    2. Refer to industry sample guiding principles for data management.
    3. Discuss what’s important to stakeholders and owners, e.g. security, transparency, integrity. Good guiding principles address real challenges.
    4. A helpful tip: Craft principles as “We will…” statements for the problems you’ve identified.

    Twelve data management universal principles

    [SAMPLE]
    Principle Definitions
    Data Is Accessible Data is accessible across the organization based on individuals’ roles and privileges.
    Treat Data as an Asset Treat data as a most valuable foundation to make right decisions at the right time. Manage the data lifecycle across organization.
    Manage Data Define strategic enterprise data management that defines, integrates, and effectively retrieves data to generate accurate, consistent insights.
    Define Ownership & Stewardship Organizations should clearly appoint data owners and data stewards and ensure all team members understand their role in the company’s data management system.
    Use Metadata Use metadata to ensure data is properly managed by tacking how data has been collected, verified, reported, and analyzed.
    Single Source of Truth Ensure the master data maintenance across the organization.
    Ensure Data Quality Ensure data integrity though out the lifecycle of data by establishing a data quality management program.
    Data Is Secured Classify and maintain the sensitivity of the data.
    Maximize Data Use Extend the organization’s ability to make the most of its data.
    Empower the Users Foster data fluency and technical proficiency through training to maximize optimal business decision making.
    Share the Knowledge Share and publish the most valuable insights appropriately.
    Consistent Data Definitions Establish a business data glossary that defines consistent business definitions and usage of the data.

    Create a Data Management Roadmap

    Phase 2

    Assess Data Management and Build Your Roadmap

    Phase 1

    1.1 Review the Data Management Framework

    1.2 Understand and Align to Business Drivers

    1.3 Build High-Value Use Cases

    1.4 Create a Vision

    Phase 2

    2.1 Assess Data Management

    2.2 Build Your Data Management Roadmap

    2.3 Organize Business Data Domains

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Understand your current data management capabilities.
    • Define target-state capabilities required to achieve business goals and enable the data strategy.
    • Identify priority initiatives and planning timelines for data management improvements.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Data Management Lead/Information Management Lead, CDO, Data Lead
    • Senior Business Leaders
    • Business SMEs
    • Data owners, records managers, regulatory subject matter experts (e.g. legal counsel, security)

    Step 2.1

    Assess Your Data Management Capabilities

    Activities

    2.1.1 Define current state of data management capabilities

    2.1.2 Set target state and identify gaps

    This step will guide you through the following activities:

    • Assess the current state of your data management capabilities.
    • Define target-state capabilities required to achieve business goals and enable the data strategy.
    • Identify gaps and prioritize focus areas for improvement.

    Outcomes of this step

    • A prioritized set of improvement areas aligned with business value stream and drivers

    Assess Data Management and Build Your Roadmap

    Step 2.1 Step 2.2 Step 2.3

    Define current state

    The Data Management Assessment and Planning Tool will help you analyze your organization’s data requirements, identify data management strategies, and systematically develop a plan for your target data management practice.
    • Based on Info-Tech’s Data Management Framework, evaluate the current-state performance levels for your organization’s data management practice.
    • Use the CMMI maturity index to assign values 1 to 5 for each capability and enabler.

    A visualization of stairs numbered up from the bottom. Main headlines of each step are 'Initial and Reactive', 'Managed while developing DG capabilities', 'Defined DG capabilities', 'Quantitatively Managed by DG capabilities', and 'Optimized'.

    Sample of the 'Data Management Current State Assessment' form the Data Management Assessment and Planning Tool.

    2.1.1 Define current state

    Input: Stakeholder survey results and elicitation findings, Use cases, Business and data management capability map

    Output: Current-state data management capabilities

    Materials: Data Management Assessment and Planning Tool

    Participants: Key business stakeholders, Business leads and SMEs, Project team, Project sponsor, Data leads, Data custodians

    Assign a maturity level value from 1 to 5 for each question in the assessment tool, organized into capabilities, e.g. Data Governance, Data Quality, Risk.

    1. Bring together key business stakeholders (data owners, SMEs, and relevant IT custodians) to assign current-state maturity levels in each question of the worksheet.
    2. Remember that there is more distance between levels 4 and 5 than there is between 1 and 2 – the distance between levels is not even throughout.
    3. To help assign values, think of the higher levels as representing cross-enterprise standardization, monitored for continuous improvement, formalized and standardized, while the lower levels mean applied within individual units, not formalized or tracked for performance.
    4. In tab 4, “Current State Assessment,” populate a current-state value for each item in the Data Management Capabilities worksheet.
    5. Once you’ve entered values in tab 4, a visual and summary report of the results will be generated on tab 5, “Current State Results.”

    2.1.2 Set target state and identify gaps

    Input: Stakeholder survey results and elicitation findings, Use cases, Business and data management capability map to identify priorities

    Output: Target-state data management capabilities, Gaps identification and analysis

    Materials: Data Management Assessment and Planning Tool

    Participants: Key business stakeholders, Business leads and SMEs, Project team, Project sponsor, Data leads, Data custodians

    Assign a maturity level value from 1 to 5 for each question in the assessment tool, organized into capabilities, e.g., Data Governance, Data Quality, Risk.

    1. Bring together key business stakeholders (data owners, SMEs, and relevant IT custodians) to assign target-state maturity levels in each question of the worksheet.
    2. Remember that there is more distance between levels 4 and 5 than there is between 1 and 2 – the distance between levels is not even throughout.
    3. To help assign values, think of the higher levels as representing cross-enterprise standardization, monitored for continuous improvement, formalized and standardized, while the lower levels mean applied within individual units, not formalized or tracked for performance.
    4. In tab 6, “Target State & Gap Analysis,” enter maturity values in each item of the Capabilities worksheet in the Target State column.
    5. Once you’ve assigned both target-state and current-state values, the tool will generate a gap analysis chart on tab 7, “Gap Analysis Results,” where you can start to decide first- and second-line priorities.

    Step 2.2

    Build Your Data Management Roadmap

    Activities

    2.2.1 Describe gaps

    2.2.2 Define gap initiatives

    2.2.2 Build a data management roadmap

    This step will guide you through the following activities:

    • Identify and understand data management gaps.
    • Develop data management improvement initiatives.
    • Build a data management–prioritized roadmap.

    Outcomes of this step

    • A foundation for data management initiative planning that’s aligned with the organization’s business architecture: value streams, business capability map, and strategy map

    Assess Data Management and Build Your Roadmap

    Step 2.1 Step 2.2 Step 2.3

    2.2.1 Describe gaps

    Input: Target-state maturity level

    Output: Detail and context about gaps to lead planners to specific initiatives

    Materials: Data Management Assessment and Planning Tool

    Participants: Key business stakeholders, Business leads and SMEs, Project team, Project sponsor, Data leads, Data custodians

    Based on the gaps result, describe the nature of the gap, which will lead to specific initiatives for the data management plan:

    1. In tab 6, “Target State & Gap Analysis,” the same tab where you entered your target-state maturity level, enter additional context about the nature and extent of each gap in the Gap Description column.
    2. Based on the best-practices framework we walked through in Phase 1, note the specific areas that are not fully developed in your organization; for example, we don’t have a model of our environment and its integrations, or there isn’t an established data quality practice with proactive monitoring and intervention.

    2.2.2 Define gap initiatives

    Input: Gaps analysis, Gaps descriptions

    Output: Data management initiatives

    Materials: Data Management Assessment and Planning Tool

    Participants: Key business stakeholders, Business leads and SMEs, Project team, Project sponsor, Data leads, Data custodians

    Based on the gap analysis, start to define the data management initiatives that will close the gaps and help the organization achieve its target state.

    1. In tab 6, “Target State & Gap Analysis,” the same tab where you entered your target-state maturity level, note in the Gap Initiative column what actions you can take to address the gap for each item. For example, if we found through diagnostics and use cases that users didn’t understand the meaning of their data or reports, an initiative might be, “Build a standard enterprise business data catalog.”
    2. It’s an opportunity to brainstorm, to be creative, and think about possibilities. We’ll use the roadmap step to select initiatives from this list.
    3. There are things we can do right away to make a difference. Acknowledge the resources, talent, and leadership momentum you already have in your organization and leverage those to find activities that will work in your culture. For example, one company held a successful Data Day to socialize the roadmap and engage users.

    2.2.3 Build a data management roadmap

    Input: Gap initiatives, Target state and current-state assessment

    Output: Data management initiatives and roadmap

    Materials: Data Management Assessment and Planning Tool

    Participants: Key business stakeholders, Business leads and SMEs, Project team, Project sponsor, Data leads, Data custodians

    Start to list tangible actions you will take to address gaps and achieve data objectives and business goals along with timelines and responsibility:

    1. With an understanding of your priority areas and specific gaps, and referring back to your use cases, draw up specific initiatives that you can track, measure, and align with your original goals.
    2. For example, in data governance, initiatives might include:
      • Assign data owners and stewards for all data assets.
      • Consolidate disparate business data catalogs.
      • Create a data governance charter or terms of reference.
    3. Alongside the initiatives, fill in other detail, especially who is responsible and timing (start and end dates). Assigning responsibility and some time markers will help to keep momentum alive and make the work projects real.

    Step 2.3

    Organize Business Data Domains

    Activities

    2.3.1 Define business data domains and assign owners

    This step will guide you through the following activities:

    • Identify business data domains that flow through and support the systems environment and business processes.
    • Define and organize business data domains with assigned owners, artifacts, and profiles.
    • Apply the domain map to building governance program.

    Outcomes of this step

    • Business data domain map with assigned owners and artifacts

    Assess Data Management and Build Your Roadmap

    Step 2.1 Step 2.2 Step 2.3

    2.3.1 Define business data domains

    Input: Target-state maturity level

    Output: Detail and context about gaps to lead planners to specific initiatives

    Materials: Data Management Assessment and Planning Tool

    Participants: Key business stakeholders, Business leads and SMEs, Project team, Project sponsor, Data leads, Data custodians

    Identify the key data domains for each line of business, where the data resides, and the main contact or owner.

    1. We have an understanding of what the business wants to achieve, e.g. build customer loyalty or comply with privacy laws. But where is the data that can help us achieve that? What systems is that data moving and living in and who, if anyone, owns it?
    2. Define the main business data domains apart from what system it may be spread over. Use the worksheet on the next slide as an example.
    3. Examples of business data domains: Customer, Product, Vendor.
    4. Each domain should have owners and associated business processes. Assign data domain owners, application owners, and business process owners.

    Business and data domains

    [SAMPLE]

    Business Domain App/Data Domains Business Stewards Application Owners Business Owners
    Client Experience and Sales Tech Salesforce (Sales, Service, Experience Clouds), Mulesoft (integration point) (Any team inputting data into the system)
    Quality and Regulatory Salesforce
    Operations Salesforce, Salesforce Referrals, Excel spreadsheets, SharePoint
    Finance Workday, Sage 300 (AccPac), Salesforce, Moneris Finance
    Risk/Legal Network share drive/SharePoint
    Human Resources Workday, Network share drive/SharePoint HR team
    Corporate Sales Salesforce (Sales, Service, Health, Experience Clouds),
    Sales and Client Success Mitel, Outlook, PDF intake forms, Workday, Excel. Sales & Client Success Director, Marketing Director CIO, Sales & Client Success Director, Marketing Director

    Embrace the technology

    Make the available data governance tools and technology work for you:
    • Data catalog
    • Business data glossary
    • Data lineage
    • Metadata management
    While data governance tools and technologies are no panacea, leverage their automated and AI-enabled capabilities to augment your data governance program.
    Array of logos of tech companies whose products are used for this type of work: Informatica, Collibra, Tibco, Alation, Immuta, TopQuadrant, and SoftwareReviews.

    Additional Support

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech Workshop.
    Photo of an analyst.

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.

    Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:
    Sample of the Data Governance Strategy Map slide from earlier.

    Build Your Business and User Context

    Work with your core team of stakeholders to build out your data management roadmap, aligning data management initiatives with business capabilities, value streams, and, ultimately, your strategic priorities.
    Sample of a 'Data Management Enablers' table.

    Formulate a Plan to Get to Your Target State

    Develop a data management future-state roadmap and plan based on an understanding of your current data governance capabilities, your operating environment, and the driving needs of your business.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Stock image of people pointing to a tablet with a dashboard.

    Build a Robust and Comprehensive Data Strategy

    Key to building and fostering a data-driven culture.
    Sample of the 'Data & Analytics Landscape' slide from earlier.

    Understand the Data and Analytics Landscape

    Optimize your data and analytics environment.
    Stock image of co-workers looking at the same thing.

    Build a Data Pipeline for Reporting and Analytics

    Data architecture best practices to prepare data for reporting and analytics.

    Research Contributors

    Name Position Company
    Anne Marie Smith Board of Directors DAMA International
    Andy Neill Practice Lead, Data & Analytics Info-Tech Research Group
    Dirk Coetsee Research Director, Data & Analytics Info-Tech Research Group
    Graham Price Executive Advisor, Advisory Executive Services Info-Tech Research Group
    Igor Ikonnikov Research Director, Data & Analytics Info-Tech Research Group
    Jean Bujold Senior Workshop Delivery Director Info-Tech Research Group
    Mario Cantin Chief Data Strategist Prodago
    Martin Sykora Director NexJ Analytics
    Michael Blaha Author, Patterns of Data Modeling Consultant
    Rajesh Parab Research Director, Data & Analytics Info-Tech Research Group
    Ranjani Ranganathan Product Manager, Research – Workshop Delivery Info-Tech Research Group
    Reddy Doddipalli Senior Workshop Director Info-Tech Research Group

    Bibliography

    AIIM, “What is Enterprise Content Management (ECM)?” Intelligent Information Management Glossary, AIIM, 2021. Web.

    BABOK V3: A Guide to Business Analysis Body of Knowledge. IIBA, 2014. Web.

    Barton, Dominic, and David Court. "Three Keys To Building a Data-Driven Strategy." McKinsey and Company, 1 Mar. 2013. Web.

    Boston University Libraries. "Data Life Cycle » Research Data Management | Boston University." Research Data Management RSS. Boston University, n.d. Accessed Oct. 2015.

    Chang, Jenny. “97 Supply Chain Statistics You Must Know: 2020 / 2021 Market Share Analysis & Data.” FinancesOnline, 2021. Web.

    COBIT 5: Enabling Information. ISACA, 2013. Web.

    CSC (Computer Sciences Corporation), Big Data Infographic, 2012. Web.

    DAMA International. DAMA-DMBOK Guide. 1st ed., Technics Publications, 2009. Digital.

    DAMA International. “DAMA Guide to the Data Management Body of Knowledge (DAMA-DMBOK2 Guide).” 2nd ed., 2017. Accessed June 2017.

    Davenport, Thomas H. "Analytics in Sports: The New Science of Winning." International Institute for Analytics, 2014. Web.

    Department of Homeland Security. Enterprise Data Management Policy. Department of Homeland Security, 25 Aug. 2014. Web.

    Enterprise Data Management Data Governance Plan. US Federal Student Aid, Feb. 2007. Accessed Oct. 2015.

    Experian. “10 signs you are sitting on a pile of data debt.” Experian, 2020. Accessed 25 June 2021.

    Fasulo, Phoebe. “6 Data Management Trends in Financial Services.” SecurityScorecard, 3 June 2021. Web.

    Georgia DCH Medicaid Enterprise – Data Management Strategy. Georgia Department of Community Health, Feb. 2015. Accessed Oct. 2015.

    Hadavi, Cyrus. “Use Exponential Growth of Data to Improve Supply Chain Operations.” Forbes, 5 Oct. 2021. Web.

    Harbert, Tam. “Tapping the power of unstructured data.” MIT Sloan, 1 Feb. 2021. Web.

    Hoberman, Steve, and George McGeachie. Data Modeling Made Simple with PowerDesigner. Technics Pub, 2011. Print.

    “Information Management Strategy.” Information Management – Alberta. Service Alberta, Nov.-Dec. 2013. Web.

    Jackson, Brian, et al. “2021 Tech Trends.” Info-Tech Research Group, 2021. Web.

    Jarvis, David, et al. “The hyperquantified athlete: Technology, measurement, and the business of sports.” Deloitte Insights, 7 Dec. 2020. Web.

    Bibliography

    Johnson, Bruce. “Leveraging Subject Area Models.” EIMInsight Magazine, vol. 3, no. 4, April 2009. Accessed Sept. 2015.

    Lewis, Larry. "How to Use Big Data to Improve Supply Chain Visibility." Talking Logistics, 14 Sep. 2014. Web.

    McAfee, Andrew, and Erik Brynjolfsson. “Big Data: The Management Revolution,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 90, no. 10, 2012, pp. 60-68.

    Meyer-Cuno, Doug. “Is A Vision Statement Important?” Forbes, 24 Feb. 2021. Web.

    MIT. “Big Data: The Management Revolution.” MIT Center for Digital Business, 29 May 2014. Accessed April 2014.

    "Open Framework, Information Management Strategy & Collaborative Governance.” MIKE2 Methodology RSS, n.d. Accessed Aug. 2015.

    PwC. “Asset Management 2020: A Brave New World.” PwC, 2014. Accessed April 2014.

    Riley, Jenn. Understanding Metadata: What is Metadata, and What is it For: A Primer. NISO, 1 Jan. 2017. Web.

    Russom, Philip. "TDWI Best Practices Report: Managing Big Data." TDWI, 2013. Accessed Oct. 2015.

    Schneider, Joan, and Julie Hall. “Why Most Product Launches Fail.” Harvard Business Review, April 2011. Web.

    Sheridan, Kelly. "2015 Trends: The Growth of Information Governance | Insurance & Technology." InformationWeek. UBM Tech, 10 Dec. 2014. Accessed Nov. 2015.

    "Sports Business Analytics and Tickets: Case Studies from the Pros." SloanSportsConference. Live Analytics – Ticketmaster, Mar. 2013. Accessed Aug. 2015.

    Srinivasan, Ramya. “Three Analytics Breakthroughs That Will Define Business in 2021.” Forbes, 4 May 2021. Web.

    Statista. “Amount of data created, consumed, and stored 2010-2020.” Statista, June 2021. Web.

    “Understanding the future of operations: Accenture Global Operations Megatrends research.” Accenture Consulting, 2015. Web.

    Vardhan, Harsh. “Why So Many Product Ideas Fail?” Medium, 26, Sept. 2020. Web.

    Tech Trend Update: If Biosecurity Then Autonomous Edge

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}99|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Innovation
    • Parent Category Link: /innovation

    COVID-19 has created new risks to physical encounters among workers and customers. New biosecurity processes and ways to effectively enforce them – in the least intrusive way possible – are required to resume these activities.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    New biosecurity standards will be imposed on many industries, and the autonomous edge will be part of the solution to manage that new reality.

    Impact and Result

    There are some key considerations for businesses considering new biosecurity measures:

    1. If prevention, then ID-based access control
    2. If intervention, then alerts based on data
    3. If investigation, then contact tracing

    Tech Trend Update: If Biosecurity Then Autonomous Edge Research & Tools

    Tech Trend Update: If Biosecurity Then Autonomous Edge

    Understand how new biosecurity requirements could affect your business and why AI at the edge could be part of the solution.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    • Tech Trend Update: If Biosecurity Then Autonomous Edge Storyboard
    [infographic]

    The First 100 Days as CISO

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}248|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: 50 Average Days Saved
    • member rating average days saved: After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve.
    • Parent Category Name: Security Strategy & Budgeting
    • Parent Category Link: /security-strategy-and-budgeting
    • Make a good first impression at your new job.
    • Obtain guidance on how you should approach the first 100 days.
    • Assess the current state of the security program and recommend areas of improvement and possible solutions.
    • Develop a high-level security strategy in three months.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Every CISO needs to follow Info-Tech’s five-step approach to truly succeed in their new position. The meaning and expectations of a CISO role will differ from organization to organization and person to person, however, the approach to the new position will be relatively the same.
    • Eighty percent of your time will be spent listening. The first 100 days of the CISO role is an information gathering exercise that will involve several conversations with different stakeholders and business divisions. Leverage this collaborative time to understand the business, its internal and external operations, and its people. Unequivocally, active listening will build company trust and help you to build an information security vision that reflects that of the business strategy.
    • Start “working” before you actually start the job. This involves finding out as much information about the company before officially being an employee. Investigate the company website and leverage available organizational documents and initial discussions to better understand your employer’s leadership, company culture ,and business model.

    Impact and Result

    • Hit the ground running with Info-Tech’s ready-made agenda vetted by CISO professionals to impress your colleagues and superiors.
    • Gather details needed to understand the organization (i.e. people, process, technology) and determine the current state of the security program.
    • Track and assess high-level security gaps using Info-Tech’s diagnostic tools and compare yourself to your industry’s vertical using benchmarking data.
    • Deliver an executive presentation that shows key findings obtained from your security evaluation.

    The First 100 Days as CISO Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why the first 100 days of being a CISO is a crucial time to be strategic. Review Info-Tech’s methodology and discover our five-step approach to CISO success.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Prepare

    Review previous communications to prepare for your first day.

    • CISO Diary
    • Introduction Sheet

    2. Build relationships

    Understand how the business operates and develop meaningful relationships with your sphere of influence.

    3. Inventory components of the business

    Inventory company assets to know what to protect.

    4. Assess security posture

    Evaluate the security posture of the organization by leveraging Info-Tech’s IT Security diagnostic program.

    • Diagnostic Benchmarks: Security Governance & Management Scorecard
    • Diagnostic Benchmarks: Security Business Satisfaction Report

    5. Deliver plan

    Communicate your security vision to business stakeholders.

    • The First 100 Days as CISO Executive Presentation Template
    • The First 100 Days as CISO Executive Presentation Example
    [infographic]

    Modernize Communications and Collaboration Infrastructure

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}306|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.4/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $68,332 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 22 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Voice & Video Management
    • Parent Category Link: /voice-video-management
    • Organizations are losing productivity from managing the limitations of yesterday’s technology. The business is changing and the current communications solution no longer adequately connects end users.
    • Old communications technology, including legacy telephony systems, disjointed messaging and communication or collaboration mediums, and unintuitive video conferencing, deteriorates the ability of users to work together in a productive manner.
    • You need a solution that meets budgetary requirements and improves internal and external communication, productivity, and the ability to work together.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Project scope and assessment will take more time than you initially anticipate. Poorly defined technical requirements can result in failure to meet the needs of the business. Defining project scope and assessing the existing solution is 60% of project time. Being thorough here will make the difference moving forward.
    • Even when the project is about modernizing technology, it’s not really about the technology. The requirements of your people and the processes you want to maintain or reform should be the influential factors in your decisions on technology.
    • Gaining business buy-in can be difficult for projects that the business doesn’t equate with directly driving revenue. Ensure your IT team communicates with the business throughout the process and establishes business requirements. Framing conversations in a “business first, IT second” way is crucial to speaking in a language the business will understand.

    Impact and Result

    • Define a comprehensive set of requirements (across people, process, and technology) at the start of the project. Communication solutions are long-term commitments and mistakes in planning will be amplified during implementation.
    • Analyze the pros and cons of each deployment option and identify a communications solution that balances your budget and communications objectives and requirements.
    • Create an effective RFP by outlining your specific business and technical needs and goals.
    • Make the case for your communications infrastructure modernization project and be prepared to support it.

    Modernize Communications and Collaboration Infrastructure Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should modernize your communications and collaboration infrastructure, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Assess communications infrastructure

    Evaluate the infrastructure requirements and the ability to undergo modernization from legacy technology.

    • Modernize Communications and Collaboration Infrastructure – Phase 1: Assess Communications Infrastructure
    • Communications Infrastructure Roadmap Tool
    • Team Skills Inventory Tool
    • MACD Workflow Mapping Template - Visio
    • MACD Workflow Mapping Template - PDF

    2. Define the target state

    Build and document a formal set of business requirements using Info-Tech's pre-populated template after identifying stakeholders, aligning business and user needs, and evaluating deployment options.

    • Modernize Communications and Collaboration Infrastructure – Phase 2: Define the Target State
    • Stakeholder Engagement Workbook
    • Communications Infrastructure Stakeholder Focus Group Guide
    • IP Telephony and UC End-User Survey Questions
    • Enterprise Communication and Collaboration System Business Requirements Document
    • Communications TCO-ROI Comparison Calculator

    3. Advance the project

    Draft an RFP for a UC solution and gain project approval using Info-Tech’s executive presentation deck.

    • Modernize Communications and Collaboration Infrastructure – Phase 3: Advance the Project
    • Unified Communications Solution RFP Template
    • Modernize Communications Infrastructure Executive Presentation
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Modernize Communications and Collaboration Infrastructure

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Assess the Communications Infrastructure

    The Purpose

    Identify pain points.

    Build a skills inventory.

    Define and rationalize template configuration needs.

    Define standard service requests and map workflow.

    Discuss/examine site type(s) and existing technology.

    Determine network state and readiness.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    IT skills & process understanding.

    Documentation reflecting communications infrastructure.

    Reviewed network readiness.

    Completed current state analysis.

    Activities

    1.1 Build a skills inventory.

    1.2 Document move, add, change, delete (MACD) processes.

    1.3 List relevant communications and collaboration technologies.

    1.4 Review network readiness checklist.

    Outputs

    Clearly documented understanding of available skills

    Documented process maps

    Complete list of relevant communications and collaboration technologies

    Completed readiness checklist

    2 Learn and Evaluate Options to Define the Future

    The Purpose

    Hold focus group meeting.

    Define business needs and goals.

    Define solution options.

    Evaluate options.

    Discuss business value and readiness for each option.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Completed value and readiness assessment.

    Current targets for service and deployment models.

    Activities

    2.1 Conduct internal focus group.

    2.2 Align business needs and goals.

    2.3 Evaluate deployment options.

    Outputs

    Understanding of user needs, wants, and satisfaction with current solution

    Assessment of business needs and goals

    Understanding of potential future-state solution options

    3 Identify and Close the Gaps

    The Purpose

    Identify gaps.

    Examine and evaluate ways to remedy gaps.

    Determine specific business requirements and introduce draft of business requirements document.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Completed description of future state.

    Identification of gaps.

    Identification of key business requirements.

    Activities

    3.1 Identify gaps and brainstorm gap remedies.

    3.2 Complete business requirements document.

    Outputs

    Well-defined gaps and remedies

    List of specific business requirements

    4 Build the Roadmap

    The Purpose

    Introduce Unified Communications Solution RFP Template.

    Develop statement of work (SOW).

    Document technical requirements.

    Complete cost-benefit analysis.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Unified Communications RFP.

    Documented technical requirements.

    Activities

    4.1 Draft RFP (SOW, tech requirements, etc.).

    4.2 Conduct cost-benefit analysis.

    Outputs

    Ready to release RFP

    Completed cost-benefit analysis

    Structure the Role of the DBA

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}273|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Business Intelligence Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /business-intelligence-strategy
    • The traditional role of Database Administrators (DBAs) is shifting due to a variety of changes such as cloud databases, increased automation, close relations with development, and the need for more integration with the business at large. All this means that organizations will have to adapt to integrate a new type of DBA into IT.
    • Organizations often have difficulty establishing a refined and effective DBA structure based on repeatable and well-grounded processes.
    • The relationship between DBAs and the rest of IT (especially development) can often be problematic due to a lack of mutual co-operation and clear communication.
    • There is often confusion in organizations as how to approach staffing DBAs.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • An organization’s relative focus on operations or development is essential in determining many DBA related decisions. This focus can determine what kinds of DBAs to hire, what staffing ratios to use, the viability of outsourcing, and the appropriate reporting structure for DBAs.
    • Utilizing technological strategies such as database automation, effective auditing, and database consolidation to bolster the DBA team helps make efficient use of DBA staff and can turn a reactive environment into a proactive one.
    • Ensuring refined and regularly assessed processes are in place for change and incident management is essential for maintaining effective and structured database administration.

    Impact and Result

    • Right-size, support, and structure your DBA team for increased cost effectiveness and optimal productivity.
    • Develop a superior level of co-operation between DBAs and the rest of IT as well as the business at large.
    • Build an environment in which DBAs will be motivated and flourish.

    Structure the Role of the DBA Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Understand how Database Administrators are evolving

    Develop an effective structure for managing and supporting Database Administrators.

    • Storyboard: Structure the Role of the DBA

    2. Create the right Database Administrator roles to meet organizational needs

    Build a team that is relevant to the focus of the organization.

    • System Database Administrator
    • Application Database Administrator
    [infographic]

    Advisory Call Outline: Software Selection Engagement

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}609|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Selection & Implementation
    • Parent Category Link: /selection-and-implementation
    • Selection takes forever. Traditional software selection drags on for years, sometimes in perpetuity.
    • IT is viewed as a bottleneck and the business has taken control of software selection.
    • “Gut feel” decisions rule the day. Intuition, not hard data, guides selection, leading to poor outcomes.
    • Negotiations are a losing battle. Money is left on the table by inexperienced negotiators.
    • Overall: Poor selection processes lead to wasted time, wasted effort, and applications that continually disappoint.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Adopt a formal methodology to accelerate and improve software selection results.
    • Improve business satisfaction by including the right stakeholders and delivering new applications on a truly timely basis.
    • Kill the “sacred cow” requirements that only exist because “it’s how we’ve always done it.”
    • Forget about “RFP” overload and hone in on the features that matter to your organization.
    • Skip the guesswork and validate decisions with real data.
    • Take control of vendor “dog and pony shows” with single-day, high-value, low-effort, rapid-fire investigative interviews.
    • Master vendor negotiations and never leave money on the table.

    Impact and Result

    • Improving software selection is a critical project that will deliver huge value.
    • Hit a home run with your business stakeholders: use a data-driven approach to select the right application vendor for their needs – fast.
    • Shatter stakeholder expectations with truly rapid application selections.
    • Boost collaboration and crush the broken telephone with concise and effective stakeholder meetings.
    • Lock in hard savings and do not pay list price by using data-driven tactics.

    Advisory Call Outline: Software Selection Engagement Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Advisory Call Outline

    Info-Tech's expert analyst guidance will help you save money, align stakeholders, and speed up the application selection process.

    • Advisory Call Outline: Software Selection Engagement Deck

    2. Workshop Overview

    Info-Tech's workshop will help you implement a repeatable, data-driven approach that accelerates software selection efforts.

    • Rapid Software Selection Workshop Overview
    [infographic]

    Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}410|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.6/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $83,037 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 32 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: DR and Business Continuity
    • Parent Category Link: /business-continuity
    • Any time a natural disaster or major IT outage occurs, it increases executive awareness and internal pressure to create a disaster recovery plan (DRP).
    • Traditional DRP templates are onerous and result in a lengthy, dense plan that might satisfy auditors but will not be effective in a crisis.
    • The myth that a DRP is only for major disasters leaves organizations vulnerable to more common incidents.
    • The growing use of outsourced infrastructure services has increased reliance on vendors to meet recovery timeline objectives.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • At its core, disaster recovery (DR) is about ensuring service continuity. Create a plan that can be leveraged for both isolated and catastrophic events.
    • Remember Murphy’s Law. Failure happens. Focus on improving overall resiliency and recovery, rather than basing DR on risk probability analysis.
    • Cost-effective DR and service continuity starts with identifying what is truly mission critical so you can focus resources accordingly. Not all services require fast failover.

    Impact and Result

    • Define appropriate objectives for service downtime and data loss based on business impact.
    • Document an incident response plan that captures all of the steps from event detection to data center recovery.
    • Create a DR roadmap to close gaps between current DR capabilities and recovery objectives.

    Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Disaster Recovery Plan (DRP) Research – A step-by-step document that helps streamline your DR planning process and build a plan that's concise, usable, and maintainable.

    Any time a major IT outage occurs, it increases executive awareness and internal pressure to create an IT DRP. This blueprint will help you develop an actionable DRP by following our four-phase methodology to define scope, current status, and dependencies; conduct a business impact analysis; identify and address gaps in the recovery workflow; and complete, extend, and maintain your DRP.

    • Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan – Phases 1-4

    2. DRP Case Studies – Examples to help you understand the governance and incident response components of a DRP and to show that your DRP project does not need to be as onerous as imagined.

    These examples include a client who leveraged the DRP blueprint to create practical, concise, and easy-to-maintain DRP governance and incident response plans and a case study based on a hospital providing a wide range of healthcare services.

    • Case Study: Practical, Right-Sized DRP
    • Case Study: Practical, Right-Sized DRP – Healthcare Example

    3. DRP Maturity Scorecard – An assessment tool to evaluate the current state of your DRP.

    Use this tool to measure your current DRP maturity and identify gaps to address. It includes a comprehensive list of requirements for your DRP program, including core and industry requirements.

    • DRP Maturity Scorecard

    4. DRP Project Charter Template – A template to communicate important details on the project purpose, scope, and parameters.

    The project charter template includes details on the project overview (description, background, drivers, and objectives); governance and management (project stakeholders/roles, budget, and dependencies); and risks, assumptions, and constraints (known and potential risks and mitigation strategy).

    • DRP Project Charter Template

    5. DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool – An evaluation tool to estimate the impact of downtime to determine appropriate, acceptable recovery time objectives (RTOs) and recovery point objectives (RPOs) and to review gaps between objectives and actuals.

    This tool enables you to identify critical applications/systems; identify dependencies; define objective scoring criteria to evaluate the impact of application/system downtime; determine the impact of downtime and establish criticality tiers; set recovery objectives (RTO/RPO) based on the impact of downtime; record recovery actuals (RTA/RPA) and identify any gaps between objectives and actuals; and identify dependencies that regularly fail (and have a significant impact when they fail) to prioritize efforts to improve resiliency.

    • DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool
    • Legacy DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool

    6. DRP BIA Scoring Context Example – A tool to record assumptions you made in the DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool to explain the results and drive business engagement and feedback.

    Use this tool to specifically record assumptions made about who and what are impacted by system downtime and record assumptions made about impact severity.

    • DRP BIA Scoring Context Example

    7. DRP Recovery Workflow Template – A flowchart template to provide an at-a-glance view of the recovery workflow.

    This simple format is ideal during crisis situations, easier to maintain, and often quicker to create. Use this template to document the Notify - Assess - Declare disaster workflow, document current and planned future state recovery workflows, including gaps and risks, and review an example recovery workflow.

    • DRP Recovery Workflow Template (PDF)
    • DRP Recovery Workflow Template (Visio)

    8. DRP Roadmap Tool – A visual roadmapping tool that will help you plan, communicate, and track progress for your DRP initiatives.

    Improving DR capabilities is a marathon, not a sprint. You likely can't fund and resource all the measures for risk mitigation at once. Instead, use this tool to create a roadmap for actions, tasks, projects, and initiatives to complete in the short, medium, and long term. Prioritize high-benefit, low-cost mitigations.

    • DRP Roadmap Tool

    9. DRP Recap and Results Template – A template to summarize and present key findings from your DR planning exercises and documents.

    Use this template to present your results from the DRP Maturity Scorecard, BCP-DRP Fitness Assessment, DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool, tabletop planning exercises, DRP Recovery Workflow Template, and DRP Roadmap Tool.

    • DRP Recap and Results Template

    10. DRP Workbook – A comprehensive tool that enables you to organize information to support DR planning.

    Leverage this tool to document information regarding DRP resources (list the documents/information sources that support DR planning and where they are located) and DR teams and contacts (list the DR teams, SMEs critical to DR, and key contacts, including business continuity management team leads that would be involved in declaring a disaster and coordinating response at an organizational level).

    • DRP Workbook

    11. Appendix

    The following tools and templates are also included as part of this blueprint to use as needed to supplement the core steps above:

    • DRP Incident Response Management Tool
    • DRP Vendor Evaluation Questionnaire
    • DRP Vendor Evaluation Tool
    • Severity Definitions and Escalation Rules Template
    • BCP-DRP Fitness Assessment
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Define Parameters for Your DRP

    The Purpose

    Identify key applications and dependencies based on business needs.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understand the entire IT “footprint” that needs to be recovered for key applications. 

    Activities

    1.1 Assess current DR maturity.

    1.2 Determine critical business operations.

    1.3 Identify key applications and dependencies.

    Outputs

    Current challenges identified through a DRP Maturity Scorecard.

    Key applications and dependencies documented in the Business Impact Analysis (BIA) Tool.

    2 Determine the Desired Recovery Timeline

    The Purpose

    Quantify application criticality based on business impact.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Appropriate recovery time and recovery point objectives defined (RTOs/RPOs).

    Activities

    2.1 Define an objective scoring scale to indicate different levels of impact.

    2.2 Estimate the impact of downtime.

    2.3 Determine desired RTO/RPO targets for applications based on business impact.

    Outputs

    Business impact analysis scoring criteria defined.

    Application criticality validated.

    RTOs/RPOs defined for applications and dependencies.

    3 Determine the Current Recovery Timeline and DR Gaps

    The Purpose

    Determine your baseline DR capabilities (your current state).

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Gaps between current and desired DR capability are quantified.

    Activities

    3.1 Conduct a tabletop exercise to determine current recovery procedures.

    3.2 Identify gaps between current and desired capabilities.

    3.3 Estimate likelihood and impact of failure of individual dependencies.

    Outputs

    Current achievable recovery timeline defined (i.e. the current state).

    RTO/RPO gaps identified.

    Critical single points of failure identified.

    4 Create a Project Roadmap to Close DR Gaps

    The Purpose

    Identify and prioritize projects to close DR gaps.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    DRP project roadmap defined that will reduce downtime and data loss to acceptable levels.

    Activities

    4.1 Determine what projects are required to close the gap between current and desired DR capability.

    4.2 Prioritize projects based on cost, effort, and impact on RTO/RPO reduction.

    4.3 Validate that the suggested projects will achieve the desired DR capability.

    Outputs

    Potential DR projects identified.

    DRP project roadmap defined.

    Desired-state incident response plan defined, and project roadmap validated.

    5 Establish a Framework for Documenting Your DRP, and Summarize Next Steps

    The Purpose

    Outline how to create concise, usable DRP documentation.

    Summarize workshop results. 

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A realistic and practical approach to documenting your DRP.

    Next steps documented. 

    Activities

    5.1 Outline a strategy for using flowcharts and checklists to create concise, usable documentation.

    5.2 Review Info-Tech’s DRP templates for creating system recovery procedures and a DRP summary document.

    5.3 Summarize the workshop results, including current potential downtime and action items to close gaps.

    Outputs

    Current-state and desired-state incident response plan flowcharts.

    Templates to create more detailed documentation where necessary.

    Executive communication deck that outlines current DR gaps, how to close those gaps, and recommended next steps.

    Further reading

    Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan

    Close the gap between your DR capabilities and service continuity requirements.

    ANALYST PERSPECTIVE

    An effective disaster recovery plan (DRP) is not just an insurance policy.

    "An effective DRP addresses common outages such as hardware and software failures, as well as regional events, to provide day-to-day service continuity. It’s not just insurance you might never cash in. Customers are also demanding evidence of an effective DRP, so organizations without a DRP risk business impact not only from extended outages but also from lost sales. If you are fortunate enough to have executive buy-in, whether it’s due to customer pressure or concern over potential downtime, you still have the challenge of limited time to dedicate to disaster recovery (DR) planning. Organizations need a practical but structured approach that enables IT leaders to create a DRP without it becoming their full-time job."

    Frank Trovato,

    Research Director, Infrastructure

    Info-Tech Research Group

    Is this research for you?

    This Research Is Designed For:

    • Senior IT management responsible for executing DR.
    • Organizations seeking to formalize, optimize, or validate an existing DRP.
    • Business continuity management (BCM) professionals leading DRP development.

    This Research Will Help You:

    • Create a DRP that is aligned with business requirements.
    • Prioritize technology enhancements based on DR requirements and risk-impact analysis.
    • Identify and address process and technology gaps that impact DR capabilities and day-to-day service continuity.

    This Research Will Also Assist:

    • Executives who want to understand the time and resource commitment required for DRP.
    • Members of BCM and crisis management teams who need to understand the key elements of an IT DRP.

    This Research Will Help Them:

    • Scope the time and effort required to develop a DRP.
    • Align business continuity, DR, and crisis management plans.

    Executive summary

    Situation

    • Any time a natural disaster or major IT outage occurs, it increases executive awareness and internal pressure to create a DRP.
    • Industry standards and government regulations are driving external pressure to develop business continuity and IT DR plans.
    • Customers are asking suppliers and partners to provide evidence that they have a workable DRP before agreeing to do business.

    Complication

    • Traditional DRP templates are onerous and result in a lengthy, dense plan that might satisfy auditors, but will not be effective in a crisis.
    • The myth that a DRP is only for major disasters leaves organizations vulnerable to more common incidents.
    • The growing use of outsourced infrastructure services has increased reliance on vendors to meet recovery timeline objectives.

    Resolution

    • Create an effective DRP by following a structured process to discover current capabilities and define business requirements for continuity:
      • Define appropriate objectives for service downtime and data loss based on business impact.
      • Document an incident response plan that captures all of the steps from event detection to data center recovery.
      • Create a DR roadmap to close gaps between current DR capabilities and recovery objectives.

    Info-Tech Insight

    1. At its core, DR is about ensuring service continuity. Create a plan that can be leveraged for both isolated and catastrophic events.
    2. Remember Murphy’s Law. Failure happens. Focus on improving overall resiliency and recovery, rather than basing DR on risk probability analysis.
    3. Cost-effective DR and service continuity starts with identifying what is truly mission critical so you can focus resources accordingly. Not all services require fast failover.

    An effective DRP is critical to reducing the cost of downtime

    If you don’t have an effective DRP when failure occurs, expect to face extended downtime and exponentially rising costs due to confusion and lack of documented processes.

    Image displayed is a graph that shows that delay in recovery causes exponential revenue loss.

    Potential Lost Revenue

    The impact of downtime tends to increase exponentially as systems remain unavailable (graph at left). A current, tested DRP will significantly improve your ability to execute systems recovery, minimizing downtime and business impact. Without a DRP, IT is gambling on its ability to define and implement a recovery strategy during a time of crisis. At the very least, this means extended downtime – potentially weeks or months – and substantial business impact.

    Adapted from: Philip Jan Rothstein, 2007

    Cost of Downtime for the Fortune 1000

    Cost of unplanned apps downtime per year: $1.25B to $2.5B.

    Cost of critical apps failure per hour: $500,000 to $1M.

    Cost of infrastructure failure per hour: $100,000.

    35% reported to have recovered within 12 hours.

    17% of infrastructure failures took more than 24 hours to recover.

    13% of application failures took more than 24 hours to recover.

    Source: Stephen Elliot, 2015

    Info-Tech Insight

    The cost of downtime is rising across the board, and not just for organizations that traditionally depend on IT (e.g. e-commerce). Downtime cost increase since 2010:

    Hospitality: 129% increase

    Transportation: 108% increase

    Media organizations: 104% increase

    An effective DRP also sets clear recovery objectives that align with system criticality to optimize spend

    The image displays a disaster recovery plan example, where different tiers are in place to support recovery in relation to time.

    Take a practical approach that creates a more concise and actionable DRP

    DR planning is not your full-time job, so it can’t be a resource- and time-intensive process.

    The Traditional Approach Info-Tech’s Approach

    Start with extensive risk and probability analysis.

    Challenge: You can’t predict every event that can occur, and this delays work on your actual recovery procedures.

    Focus on how to recover regardless of the incident.

    We know failure will happen. Focus on improving your ability to failover to a DR environment so you are protected regardless of what causes primary site failure.

    Build a plan for major events such as natural disasters.

    Challenge: Major destructive events only account for 12% of incidents while software/hardware issues account for 45%. The vast majority of incidents are isolated local events.

    An effective DRP improves day-to-day service continuity, and is not just for major events.

    Leverage DR planning to address both common (e.g. power/network outage or hardware failure) as well as major events. It must be documentation you can use, not shelfware.

    Create a DRP manual that provides step-by-step instructions that anyone could follow.

    Challenge: The result is lengthy, dense manuals that are difficult to maintain and hard to use in a crisis. The usability of DR documents has a direct impact on DR success.

    Create concise documentation written for technical experts.

    Use flowcharts, checklists, and diagrams. They are more usable in a crisis and easier to maintain. You aren’t going to ask a business user to recover your SQL Server databases, so you can afford to be concise.

    DR must be integrated with day-to-day incident management to ensure service continuity

    When a tornado takes out your data center, it’s an obvious DR scenario and the escalation towards declaring a disaster is straightforward.

    The challenge is to be just as decisive in less-obvious (and more common) DR scenarios such as a critical system hardware/software failure, and knowing when to move from incident management to DR. Don’t get stuck troubleshooting for days when you could have failed over in hours.

    Bridge the gap with clearly-defined escalation rules and criteria for when to treat an incident as a disaster.

    Image displays two graphs. The graph on the left measures the extent that service management processes account for disasters by the success meeting RTO and RPO. The graph on the right is a double bar graph that shows DRP being integrated and not integrated in the following categories: Incident Classifications, Severity Definitions, Incident Models, Escalation Procedures. These are measured based on the success meeting RTO and RPO.

    Source: Info-Tech Research Group; N=92

    Myth busted: The DRP is separate from day-to-day ops and incident management.

    The most common threats to service continuity are hardware and software failures, network outages, and power outages

    The image displayed is a bar graph that shows the common threats to service continuity. There are two areas of interest that have labels. The first is: 45% of service interruptions that went beyond maximum downtime guidelines set by the business were caused by software and hardware issues. The second label is: Only 12% of incidents were caused by major destructive events.

    Source: Info-Tech Research Group; N=87

    Info-Tech Insight

    Does this mean I don’t need to worry about natural disasters? No. It means DR planning needs to focus on overall service continuity, not just major disasters. If you ignore the more common but less dramatic causes of service interruptions, you are diminishing the business value of a DRP.

    Myth busted: DRPs are just for destructive events – fires, floods, and natural disasters.

    DR isn’t about identifying risks; it’s about ensuring service continuity

    The traditional approach to DR starts with an in-depth exercise to identify risks to IT service continuity and the probability that those risks will occur.

    Here’s why starting with a risk register is ineffective:

    • Odds are, you won’t think of every incident that might occur. If you think of twenty risks, it’ll be the twenty-first that gets you. If you try to guard against that twenty-first risk, you can quickly get into cartoonish scenarios and much more costly solutions.
    • The ability to failover to another site mitigates the risk of most (if not all) incidents (fire, flood, hardware failure, tornado, etc.). A risk and probability analysis doesn’t change the need for a plan that includes a failover procedure.

    Where risk is incorporated in this methodology:

    • Use known risks to further refine your strategy (e.g. if you are prone to hurricanes, plan for greater geographic separation between sites; ensure you have backups, in addition to replication, to mitigate the risk of ransomware).
    • Identify risks to your ability to execute DR (e.g. lack of cross-training, backups that are not tested) and take steps to mitigate those risks.

    Myth busted: A risk register is the critical first step to creating an effective DR plan.

    You can’t outsource accountability and you can’t assume your vendor’s DR capabilities meet your needs

    Outsourcing infrastructure services – to a cloud provider, co-location provider, or managed service provider (MSP) – can improve your DR and service continuity capabilities. For example, a large public cloud provider will generally have:

    • Redundant telecoms service providers, network infrastructure, power feeds, and standby power.
    • Round-the-clock infrastructure and security monitoring.
    • Multiple data centers in a given region, and options to replicate data and services across regions.

    Still, failure is inevitable – it’s been demonstrated multiple times1 through high-profile outages. When you surrender direct control of the systems themselves, it’s your responsibility to ensure the vendor can meet your DR requirements, including:

    • A DR site and acceptable recovery times for systems at that site.
    • An acceptable replication/backup schedule.

    Sources: Kyle York, 2016; Shaun Nichols, 2017; Stephen Burke, 2017

    Myth busted: I outsource infrastructure services so I don’t have to worry about DR. That’s my vendor’s responsibility.

    Choose flowcharts over process guides, checklists over procedures, and diagrams over descriptions

    IT DR is not an airplane disaster movie. You aren’t going to ask a business user to execute a system recovery, just like you wouldn’t really want a passenger with no flying experience to land a plane.

    In reality, you write a DR plan for knowledgeable technical staff, which allows you to summarize key details your staff already know. Concise, visual documentation is:

    • Quicker to create.
    • Easier to use.
    • Simpler to maintain.

    "Without question, 300-page DRPs are not effective. I mean, auditors love them because of the detail, but give me a 10-page DRP with contact lists, process flows, diagrams, and recovery checklists that are easy to follow."

    – Bernard Jones, MBCI, CBCP, CORP, Manager Disaster Recovery/BCP, ActiveHealth Management

    A graph is displayed. It shows a line graph where the DR success is higher by using flowcharts, checklists, and diagrams.

    Source: Info-Tech Research Group; N=95

    *DR Success is based on stated ability to meet recovery time objectives (RTOs) and recovery point objectives (RPOs), and reported confidence in ability to consistently meet targets.

    Myth busted: A DRP must include every detail so anyone can execute recovery.

    A DRP is part of an overall business continuity plan

    A DRP is the set of procedures and supporting documentation that enables an organization to restore its core IT services (i.e. applications and infrastructure) as part of an overall business continuity plan (BCP), as described below. Use the templates, tools, and activities in this blueprint to create your DRP.

    Overall BCP
    IT DRP BCP for Each Business Unit Crisis Management Plan
    A plan to restore IT services (e.g. applications and infrastructure) following a disruption. This includes:
    • Identifying critical applications and dependencies.
    • Defining an appropriate (desired) recovery timeline based on a business impact analysis (BIA).
    • Creating a step-by-step incident response plan.
    A set of plans to resume business processes for each business unit. Info-Tech’s Develop a Business Continuity Plan blueprint provides a methodology for creating business unit BCPs as part of an overall BCP for the organization. A set of processes to manage a wide range of crises, from health and safety incidents to business disruptions to reputational damage. This includes emergency response plans, crisis communication plans, and the steps to invoke BC/DR plans when applicable. Info-Tech’s Implement Crisis Management Best Practices blueprint provides a structured approach to develop a crisis management process.

    Note: For DRP, we focus on business-facing IT services (as opposed to the underlying infrastructure), and then identify required infrastructure as dependencies (e.g. servers, databases, network).

    Take a practical but structured approach to creating a concise and effective DRP

    Image displayed shows the structure of this blueprint. It shows the structure of phases 1-4 and the related tools and templates for each phase.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful."

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

    Workshop

    “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

    Consulting

    “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Info-Tech advisory services deliver measurable value

    Info-Tech members save an average of $22,983 and 22 days by working with an Info-Tech analyst on DRP (based on client response data from Info-Tech Research Group’s Measured Value Survey, following analyst advisory on this blueprint).

    Why do members report value from analyst engagement?

    1. Expert advice on your specific situation to overcome obstacles and speed bumps.
    2. Structured project and guidance to stay on track.
    3. Project deliverables review to ensure the process is applied properly.

    Guided implementation overview

    Your trusted advisor is just a call away.

    Define DRP scope (Call 1)

    Scope requirements, objectives, and your specific challenges. Identify applications/ systems to focus on first.

    Define current status and system dependencies (Calls 2-3)

    Assess current DRP maturity. Identify system dependencies.

    Conduct a BIA (Calls 4-6)

    Create an impact scoring scale and conduct a BIA. Identify RTO and RPO for each system.

    Recovery workflow (Calls 7-8)

    Create a recovery workflow based on tabletop planning. Identify gaps in recovery capabilities.

    Projects and action items (Calls 9-10)

    Identify and prioritize improvements. Summarize results and plan next steps.

    Your guided implementations will pair you with an advisor from our analyst team for the duration of your DRP project.

    Workshop overview

    Contact your account representative or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Image displays the workshop overview for this blueprint. It is a workshop that runs for 4 days and covers various activities and produces many deliverables.

    End-user complaints distract from serious IT-based risks to business continuity

    Case Study

    Industry: Manufacturing
    Source: Info-Tech Research Group Client Engagement

    A global manufacturer with annual sales over $1B worked with Info-Tech to improve DR capabilities.

    DRP BIA

    Conversations with the IT team and business units identified the following impact of downtime over 24 hours:

    • Email: Direct Cost: $100k; Goodwill Impact Score: 8.5/16
    • ERP: Direct Cost: $1.35mm; Goodwill Impact Score: 12.5/16

    Tabletop Testing and Recovery Capabilities

    Reviewing the organization’s current systems recovery workflow identified the following capabilities:

    • Email: RTO: minutes, RPO: minutes
    • ERP: RTO: 14 hours, RPO: 24 hours

    Findings

    Because of end-user complaints, IT had invested heavily in email resiliency though email downtime had a relatively minimal impact on the business. After working through the methodology, it was clear that the business needed to provide additional support for critical systems.

    Insights at each step:

    Identify DR Maturity and System Dependencies

    Conduct a BIA

    Outline Incident Response and Recovery Workflow With Tabletop Exercises

    Mitigate Gaps and Risks

    Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan

    Phase 1

    Define DRP Scope, Current Status, and Dependencies

    Step 1.1: Set Scope, Kick-Off the DRP Project, and Create a Charter

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Establish a team for DR planning.
    • Retrieve and review existing, relevant documentation.
    • Create a project charter.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • DRP Coordinator
    • DRP Team (Key IT SMEs)
    • IT Managers

    Results and Insights

    • Set scope for the first iteration of the DRP methodology.
    • Don’t try to complete your DR and BCPs all at once.
    • Don’t bite off too much at once.

    Kick-off your DRP project

    You’re ready to start your DR project.

    This could be an annual review – but more likely, this is the first time you’ve reviewed the DR plan in years.* Maybe a failed audit might have provided a mandate for DR planning, or a real disaster might have highlighted gaps in DR capabilities. First, set appropriate expectations for what the project is and isn’t, in terms of scope, outputs, and resource commitments. Very few organizations can afford to hire a full-time DR planner, so it’s likely this won’t be your full-time job. Set objectives and timelines accordingly.

    Gather a team

    • Often, DR efforts are led by the infrastructure and operations leader. This person can act as the DRP coordinator or may delegate this role.
    • Key infrastructure subject-matter experts (SMEs) are usually part of the team and involved through the project.

    Find and review existing documentation

    • An existing DRP may have information you can re-purpose rather than re-create.
    • High-level architecture diagrams and network diagrams can help set scope (and will become part of your DR kit).
    • Current business-centric continuity of operations plans (COOPs) or BCPs are important to understand.

    Set specific, realistic objectives

    • Create a project charter (see next slide) to record objectives, timelines, and assumptions.
    *Only 20% of respondents to an Info-Tech Research Group survey (N=165) had a complete DRP; only 38% of respondents with a complete or mostly complete DRP felt it would be effective in a crisis.

    List DRP drivers and challenges

    1(a) Drivers and roadblocks

    Estimated Time: 30 minutes

    Identify the drivers and challenges to completing a functional DRP plan with the core DR team.

    DRP Drivers

    • Past outages (be specific):
      • Hardware and software failures
      • External network and power outages
      • Building damage
      • Natural disaster(s)
    • Audit findings
    • Events in the news
    • Other?

    DRP Challenges

    • Lack of time
    • Insufficient DR budget
    • Lack of executive support
    • No internal DRP expertise
    • Challenges making the case for DRP
    • Other?

    Write down insights from the meeting on flip-chart paper or a whiteboard and use the findings to inform your DRP project (e.g. challenges to address).

    Clarify expectations with a project charter

    1(b) DRP Project Charter Template

    DRP Project Charter Template components:

    Define project parameters, roles, and objectives, and clarify expectations with the executive team. Specific subsections are listed below and described in more detail in the remainder of this phase.

    • Project Overview: Includes objectives, deliverables, and scope. Leverage relevant notes from the “Project Drivers” brainstorming exercise (e.g. past outages and near misses which help make the case).
    • Governance and Management: Includes roles, responsibilities, and resource requirements.
    • Project Risks, Assumptions, and Constraints: Includes risks and mitigation strategies, as well as any assumptions and constraints.
    • Project Sign-Off: Includes IT and executive sign-off (if required).

    Note: Identify the initial team roles and responsibilities first so they can assist in defining the project charter.

    The image is a screenshot of the first page of the DRP Project Charter Template.

    Step 1.2: Assess Current State DRP Maturity

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Complete Info-Tech’s DRP Maturity Scorecard.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • DRP Coordinator
    • IT SMEs

    Results and Insights

    • Identify the current state of the organization’s DRP and continuity management. Set a baseline for improvement.
    • Discover where improvement is most needed to create an effective plan.

    Only 38% of IT departments believe their DRPs would be effective in a real crisis

    Even organizations with documented DRPs struggle to make them actionable.

    • Even when a DRP does become a priority (e.g. due to regulatory or customer drivers), the challenge is knowing where to start and having a methodical step-by-step process for doing the work. With no guide to plan and resource the project, it becomes work that you complete piecemeal when you aren’t working on other projects, or at night after the kids go to bed.
    • Far too many organizations create a document to satisfy auditors rather than creating a usable plan. People in this group often just want a fill-in-the-blanks template. What they will typically find is a template for the traditional 300-page manual that goes in a binder that sits on a shelf, is difficult to maintain, and is not effective in a crisis.
    Two bar graphs are displayed. The graph on the left shows that only 20% of survey respondents indicate they have a complete DRP. The graph on the right shows that 38% of those who have a mostly completed or full DRP actually feel it would be effective in a crisis.

    Use the DRP Maturity Scorecard to assess the current state of your DRP and identify areas to improve

    1(c) DRP Maturity Scorecard

    Info-Tech’s DRP Maturity Scorecard evaluates completion status and process maturity for a comprehensive yet practical assessment across three aspects of an effective DRP program – Defining Requirements, Implementation, and Maintenance.

    Image has three boxes. One is labelled Completion status, another below it is labelled Process Maturity. There is an addition sign in between them. With an arrow leading from both boxes is another box that is labelled DRP Maturity Assessment

    Completion Status: Reflects the progress made with each component of your DRP Program.

    Process Maturity: Reflects the consistency and quality of the steps executed to achieve your completion status.

    DRP Maturity Assessment: Each component (e.g. BIA) of your DRP Program is evaluated based on completion status and process maturity to provide an accurate holistic assessment. For example, if your BIA completion status is 4 out of 5, but process maturity is a 2, then requirements were not derived from a consistent defined process. The risk is inconsistent application prioritization and misalignment with actual business requirements.

    Step 1.3: Identify Applications, Systems, and Dependencies

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify systems, applications, and services, and the business units that use them.
    • Document applications, systems, and their dependencies in the DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • DRP Coordinator
    • DRP Team

    Results and Insights

    • Identify core services and the applications that depend on them.
    • Add applications and dependencies to the DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool.

    Select 5-10 services to get started on the DRP methodology

    1(d) High-level prioritization

    Estimated Time: 30 minutes

    Working through the planning process the first time can be challenging. If losing momentum is a concern, limit the BIA to a few critical systems to start.

    Run this exercise if you need a structured exercise to decide where to focus first and identify the business users you should ask for input on the impact of system downtime.

    1. On a whiteboard or flip-chart paper, list business units in a column on the left. List key applications/systems in a row at the top. Draw a grid.
    2. At a high level, review how applications are used by each unit. Take notes to keep track of any assumptions you make.
      • Add a ✓ if members of the unit use the application or system.
      • Add an ✱ if members of the unit are heavy users of the application or system and/or use it for time sensitive tasks.
      • Leave the box blank if the app isn’t used by this unit.
    3. Use the chart to prioritize systems to include in the BIA (e.g. systems marked with an *) but also include a few less-critical systems to illustrate DRP requirements for a range of systems.

    Image is an example of what one could complete from step 1(d). There is a table shown. In the column on the left lists sales, marketing, R&D, and Finance. In the top row, there is listed: dialer, ERP. CRM, Internet, analytics, intranet

    Application Notes
    CRM
    • Supports time-critical sales and billing processes.
    Dialer
    • Used for driving the sales-call queue, integration with CRM.

    Draw a high-level sketch of your environment

    1(e) Sketch your environment

    Estimated Time: 1-2 hours

    A high-level topology or architectural diagram is an effective way to identify dependencies, application ownership, outsourced services, hardware redundancies, and more.

    Note:

    • Network diagrams or high-level architecture diagrams help to identify dependencies and redundancies. Even a rough sketch is a useful reference tool for participants, and will be valuable documentation in the final DR plan.
    • Keep the drawings tidy. Visualize the final diagram before you start to draw on the whiteboard to help with spacing and placement.
    • Collaborate with relevant SMEs to identify dependencies. Keep the drawing high-level.
    • Illustrate connections between applications or components with lines. Use color coding to illustrate where applications are hosted (e.g. in-house, at a co-lo, in a cloud or MSP environment).
    Example of a high-level topology or architectural diagram

    Document systems and dependencies

    Collaborate with system SMEs to identify dependencies for each application or system. Document the dependencies in the DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool (see image below)

    • When listing applications, focus on business-facing systems or services that business users will recognize and use terminology they’ll understand.
    • Group infrastructure components that support all other services as a single core infrastructure service to simplify dependency mapping (e.g. core router, virtual hosts, ID management, and DNS).
    • In general, each data center will have its own core infrastructure components. List each data center separately – especially if different services are hosted at each data center.
    • Be specific when documenting dependencies. Use existing asset tracking tables, discovery tools, asset management records, or configuration management tools to identify specific server names.
    • Core infrastructure dependencies, such as the network infrastructure, power supply, and centralized storage, will be a common set of dependencies for most applications, so group these into a separate category called “Core Infrastructure” to minimize repetition in your DR planning.
    • Document production components in the BIA tool. Capture in-production, redundant components performing the same work on a single dependency line. List standby systems in the notes.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    In general, visual documentation is easier to use in a crisis and easier to maintain over time. Use Info-Tech’s research to help build your own visual SOPs.

    Document systems and dependencies

    1(f) DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool – Record systems and dependencies

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool.

    Stories from the field: Info-Tech clients find value in Phase 1 in the following ways

    An organization uncovers a key dependency that needed to be treated as a Tier 1 system

    Reviewing the entire ecosystem for applications identified key dependencies that were previously considered non-critical. For example, a system used to facilitate secure data transfers was identified as a key dependency for payroll and other critical business processes, and elevated to Tier 1.

    A picture’s worth a thousand words (and 1600 servers)

    Drawing a simple architectural diagram was an invaluable tool to identify key dependencies and critical systems, and to understand how systems and dependencies were interconnected. The drawing was an aha moment for IT and business stakeholders trying to make sense of their 1600-server environment.

    Make the case for DRP

    A member of the S&P 500 used Info-Tech’s DRP Maturity Scorecard to provide a reliable objective assessment and make the case for improvements to the board of directors.

    State government agency initiates a DRP project to complement an existing COOP

    Info-Tech's DRP Project Charter enabled the CIO to clarify their DRP project scope and where it fit into their overall COOP. The project charter example provided much of the standard copy – objectives, scope, project roles, methodology, etc. – required to outline the project.

    Phase 1: Insights and accomplishments

    Image has two screenshots from Info-Tech's Phase 1 tools and templates.

    Created a charter and identified current maturity

    Image has two screenshots. One is from Info-Tech's DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool and the other is from the example in step 1(d).

    Identified systems and dependencies for the BIA

    Summary of Accomplishments:

    • Created a DRP project charter.
    • Completed the DRP Maturity Scorecard and identified current DRP maturity.
    • Prioritized applications/systems for a first pass through DR planning.
    • Identified dependencies for each application and system.

    Up Next: Conduct a BIA to establish recovery requirements

    Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan

    Phase 2

    Conduct a BIA to Determine Acceptable RTOs and RPOs

    Step 2.1: Define an Objective Impact Scoring Scale

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Create a scoring scale to measure the business impact of application and system downtime.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • DRP Coordinator
    • DRP Team

    Results and Insights

    • Use a scoring scale tied to multiple categories of real business impact to develop a more objective assessment of application and system criticality.

    Align capabilities to appropriate and acceptable RTOs and RPOs with a BIA

    Too many organizations avoid a BIA because they perceive it as onerous or unneeded. A well-managed BIA is straightforward and the benefits are tangible.

    A BIA enables you to identify appropriate spend levels, maintain executive support, and prioritize DR planning for a more successful outcome. Info-Tech has found that a BIA has a measurable impact on the organization’s ability to set appropriate objectives and investment goals.

    Two bar graphs are depicted. The one on the left shows 93% BIA impact on appropriate RTOs. The graph on the right shows that with BIA, there is 86% on BIA impact on appropriate spending.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Business input is important, but don’t let a lack of it delay a draft BIA. Complete a draft based on your knowledge of the business. Create a draft within IT, and use it to get input from business leaders. It’s easier to edit estimates than to start from scratch; even weak estimates are far better than a blank sheet.

    Pick impact categories that are relevant to your business to develop a holistic view of business impact

    Direct Cost Impact Categories

    • Revenue: permanently lost revenue.
      • Example: one third of daily sales are lost due to a website failure.
    • Productivity: lost productivity.
      • Example: finance staff can’t work without the accounting system.
    • Operating costs: additional operating costs.
      • Example: temporary staff are needed to re-key data.
    • Financial penalties: fines/penalties that could be incurred due to downtime.
      • Example: failure to meet contractual service-level agreements (SLAs) for uptime results in financial penalties.

    Goodwill, Compliance, and Health and Safety Categories

    • Stakeholder goodwill: lost customer, staff, or business partner goodwill due to harm, frustration, etc.
      • Example: customers can’t access needed services because the website is down.
      • Example: a payroll system outage delays paychecks for all staff.
      • Example: suppliers are paid late because the purchasing system is down.
    • Compliance, health, and safety:
      • Example: financial system downtime results in a missed tax filing.
      • Example: network downtime disconnects security cameras.

    Info-Tech Insight

    You don’t have to include every impact category in your BIA. Include categories that could affect your business. Defer or exclude other categories. For example, the bulk of revenue for governmental organizations comes from taxes, which won’t be permanently lost if IT systems fail.

    Modify scoring criteria to help you measure the impact of downtime

    The scoring scales define different types of business impact (e.g. costs, lost goodwill) using a common four-point scale and 24-hour timeframe to simplify BIA exercises and documentation.

    Use the suggestions below as a guide as you modify scoring criteria in the DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool:

    • All the direct cost categories (revenue, productivity, operating costs, financial penalties) require the user to define only a maximum value; the tool will populate the rest of the criteria for that category. Use the suggestions below to find the maximum scores for each of the direct cost categories:
      • Revenue: Divide total revenue for the previous year by 365 to estimate daily revenue. Assume this is the most revenue you could lose in a day, and use this number as the top score.
      • Loss of Productivity: Divide fully-loaded labor costs for the organization by 365 to estimate daily productivity costs. Use this as a proxy measure for the work lost if all business stopped for one day.
      • Increased Operating Costs: Isolate this to known additional costs that result from a disruption (e.g. costs for overtime or temporary staff). Estimate the maximum cost for the organization.
      • Financial Penalties: Isolate this to known financial penalties (e.g. due to failure to meet SLAs or compliance requirements). Use the estimated maximum penalty as the highest value on the scale.
    • Impact on Goodwill: Use an estimate of the percentage of all stakeholders impacted to assess goodwill impact.
    • Impact on Compliance; Impact on Health and Safety: The BIA tool contains default scoring criteria that account for the severity of the impact, the likelihood of occurrence, and in the case of compliance, whether a grace period is available. Use this scale as-is, or adapt this scale to suit your needs.

    Modify the default scoring scale in the DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool to reflect your organization

    2(a) DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool – Scoring criteria


    A screenshot of Info-Tech's DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool's scoring criteria

    Step 2.2: Estimate the Impact of Downtime

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify the business impact of service/system/application downtime.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • DRP Coordinator
    • DRP Team
    • IT Service SMEs
    • Business-Side Technology Owners (optional)

    Results and Insights

    • Apply the scoring scale to develop a more objective assessment of the business impact of downtime.
    • Create criticality tiers based on the business impact of downtime.

    Estimate the impact of downtime for each system and application

    2(b) Estimate the impact of systems downtime

    Estimated Time: 3 hours

    On tab 3 of the DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool indicate the costs of downtime, as described below:

    1. Have a copy of the “Scoring Criteria” tab available to use as a reference (e.g. printed or on a second display). In tab 3 use the drop-down menu to assign a score of 0 to 4 based on levels of impact defined in the “Scoring Criteria” tab.
    2. Work horizontally across all categories for a single system or application. This will familiarize you with your scoring scales for all impact categories, and allow you to modify the scoring scales if needed before you proceed much further.
    3. For example, if a core call center phone system was down:

    • Loss of Revenue would be the portion of sales revenue generated through the call center. This might score a 1 or 2 depending on the percent of sales that are processed by the call center.
    • The Impact on Customers might be a 2 or 3 depending on the extent that some customers might be using the call center to receive support or purchase new products or services.
    • The Legal/Regulatory Compliance and Health or Safety Risk might be a 0, as the call center has no impact in either area.
  • Next, work vertically across all applications or systems within a single impact category. This will allow you to compare scores within the category as you create them to ensure internal consistency.
  • Add impact scores to the DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool

    2(c) DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool

    Screenshot of Info-Tech's DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool

    Record business reasons and assumptions that drive BIA scores

    2(d) DRP BIA Scoring Context Example

    Info-Tech suggests that IT leadership and staff identify the impact of downtime first to create a version that you can then validate with relevant business owners. As you work through the BIA as a team, have a notetaker record assumptions you make to help you explain the results and drive business engagement and feedback.

    Some common assumptions:

    • You can’t schedule a disaster, so Info-Tech suggests you assume the worst possible timing for downtime. Base the impact of downtime on the worst day for a disaster (e.g. year-end close, payroll run).
    • Record assumptions made about who and what are impacted by system downtime.
    • Record assumptions made about impact severity.
    • If you deviate from the scoring scale, or if a particular impact doesn’t fit well into the defined scoring scale, document the exception.

    Screenshot of Info-Tech's DRP BIA Scoring Context Example

    Use Info-Tech’s DRP BIA Scoring Context Example as a note-taking template.

    Info-Tech Insight

    You can’t build a perfect scoring scale. It’s fine to make reasonable assumptions based on your judgment and knowledge of the business. Just write down your assumptions. If you don’t write them down, you’ll forget how you arrived at that conclusion.

    Assign a criticality rating based on total direct and indirect costs of downtime

    2(e) DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool – Assign criticality tiers

    Once you’ve finished estimating the impact of downtime, use the following rough guideline to create an initial sort of applications into Tiers 1, 2, and 3.

    1. In general, sort applications based on the Total Impact on Goodwill, Compliance, and Safety first.
      • An effective tactic for a quick sort: assign a Tier 1 rating where scores are 50% or more of the highest total score, Tier 2 where scores are between 25% and 50%, and Tier 3 where scores are below 25%. Some organizations will also include a Tier 0 for the highest-scoring systems.
      • Then review and validate these scores and assignments.
    2. Next, consider the Total Cost of Downtime.
      • The Total Cost is calculated by the tool based on the Scoring Criteria in tab 2 and the impact scores on tab 3.
      • Decide if the total cost impact justifies increasing the criticality rating (e.g. from Tier 2 to Tier 1 due to high cost impact).
    3. Review the assigned impact scores and tiers to check that they’re in alignment. If you need to make an exception, document why. Keep exceptions to a minimum.

    Example: Highest total score is 12

    Screenshot of Info-Tech's DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool

    Step 2.3: Determine Acceptable RTO/RPO Targets

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Review the “Debate Space” approach to setting RTO and RPO (recovery targets).
    • Set preliminary RTOs and RPOs by criticality tier.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • DRP Coordinator
    • DRP Team

    Results and Insights

    • Align recovery targets with the business impact of downtime and data loss.

    Use the “Debate Space” approach to align RTOs and RPOs with the impact of downtime

    The business must validate acceptable and appropriate RTOs and RPOs, but IT can use the guidelines below to set an initial estimate.

    Right-size recovery.

    A shorter RTO typically requires higher investment. If a short period of downtime has minimal impact, setting a low RTO may not be justifiable. As downtime continues, impact begins to increase exponentially to a point where downtime is intolerable – an acceptable RTO must be shorter than this. Apply the same thinking to RPOs – how much data loss is unnoticeable? How much is intolerable?

    A diagram to show the debate space in relation to RTOs and RPOs

    The “Debate Space” is between minimal impact and maximum tolerance for downtime.

    Estimate appropriate, acceptable RTOs and RPOs for each tier

    2(f) Set recovery targets

    Estimated Time: 30 minutes

    RTO and RPO tiers simplify management by setting similar recovery goals for systems and applications with similar criticality.

    Use the “Debate Space” approach to set appropriate and acceptable targets.

    1. For RTO, establish a recovery time range that is appropriate based on impact.
      • Overall, the RTO tiers might be 0-4 hours for gold, 4-24 hours for silver, and 24-48 hours for bronze.
    2. RPOs reflect target data protection measures.
      • Identify the lowest RPO within a tier and make that the standard.
      • For example, RPO for gold data might be five minutes, silver might be four hours, and bronze might be one day.
      • Use this as a guideline. RPO doesn’t always align perfectly with RTO tiers.
    3. Review RTOs and RPOs and make sure they accurately reflect criticality.

    Info-Tech Insight

    In general, the more critical the system, the shorter the RPO. But that’s not always the case. For example, a service bus might be Tier 1, but if it doesn’t store any data, RPO might be longer than other Tier 1 systems. Some systems may have a different RPO than most other systems in that tier. As long as the targets are acceptable to the business and appropriate given the impact, that’s okay.

    Add recovery targets to the DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool

    2(g) DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool – Document recovery objectives

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool – Document recovery objectives

    Stories from the field: Info-Tech clients find value in Phase 2 in the following ways

    Most organizations discover something new about key applications, or the way stakeholders use them, when they work through the BIA and review the results with stakeholders. For example:

    Why complete a BIA? There could be a million reasons

    • A global manufacturer completed the DRP BIA exercise. When email went down, Service Desk phones lit up until it was resolved. That grief led to a high availability implementation for email. However, the BIA illustrated that ERP downtime was far more impactful.
    • ERP downtime would stop production lines, delay customer orders, and ultimately cost the business a million dollars a day.
    • The BIA results clearly showed that the ERP needed to be prioritized higher, and required business support for investment.

    Move from airing grievances to making informed decisions

    The DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool helped structure stakeholder consultations on DR requirements for a large university IT department. Past consultations had become an airing of grievances. Using objective impact scores helped stakeholders stay focused and make informed decisions around appropriate RTOs and RPOs.

    Phase 2: Insights and accomplishments

    Screenshots of the tools and templates from this phase.

    Estimated the business impact of downtime

    Screenshot of a tools from this phase

    Set recovery targets

    Summary of Accomplishments

    • Created a scoring scale tied to different categories of business impact.
    • Applied the scoring scale to estimate the business impact of system downtime.
    • Identified appropriate, acceptable RTOs and RPOs.

    Up Next:Conduct a tabletop planning exercise to establish current recovery capabilities

    Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan

    Phase 3

    Identify and Address Gaps in the Recovery Workflow

    Step 3.1: Determine Current Recovery Workflow

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Run a tabletop exercise.
    • Outline the steps for the initial response (notification, assessment, disaster declaration) and systems recovery (i.e. document your recovery workflow).
    • Identify any gaps and risks in your initial response and systems recovery.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • DRP Coordinator
    • IT Infrastructure SMEs (for systems in scope)
    • Application SMEs (for systems in scope)

    Results and Insights

    • Use a repeatable practical exercise to outline and document the steps you would use to recover systems in the event of a disaster, as well as identify gaps and risks to address.
    • This is also a knowledge-sharing opportunity for your team, and a practical means to get their insights, suggestions, and recovery knowledge down on paper.

    Tabletop planning: an effective way to test and document your recovery workflow

    In a tabletop planning exercise, the DRP team walks through a disaster scenario to map out what should happen at each stage, and effectively defines a high-level incident response plan (i.e. recovery workflow).

    Tabletop planning had the greatest impact on meeting recovery objectives (RTOs/RPOs) among survey respondents.

    A bar graph is displayed that shows that tabletop planning has the greatest impact on meeting recovery objectives (RTOs/RPOs) among survey respondents.

    *Note: Relative importance indicates the contribution an individual testing methodology, conducted at least annually, had on predicting success meeting recovery objectives, when controlling for all other types of tests in a regression model. The relative-importance values have been standardized to sum to 100%.

    Success was based on the following items:

    • RTOs are consistently met.
    • IT has confidence in the ongoing ability to meet RTOs.
    • RPOs are consistently met.
    • IT has confidence in the ongoing ability to meet RPOs.

    Why is tabletop planning so effective?

    • It enables you to play out a wider range of scenarios than technology-based testing (e.g. full-scale, parallel) due to cost and complexity factors.
    • It is non-intrusive, so it can be executed more frequently than other testing methodologies.
    • It easily translates into the backbone of your recovery documentation, as it allows you to review all aspects of your recovery plan.

    Focus first on IT DR

    Your DRP is IT contingency planning. It is not crisis management or BCP.

    The goal is to define a plan to restore applications and systems following a disruption. For your first tabletop exercise, Info-Tech recommends you use a non-life-threatening scenario that requires at least a temporary relocation of your data center (i.e. failing over to a DR site/environment). Assume a gas leak or burst water pipe renders the data center inaccessible. Power is shut off and IT must failover systems to another location. Once you create the master procedure, review the plan to ensure it addresses other scenarios.

    Info-Tech Insight

    When systems fail, you are faced with two high-level options: failover or recover in place. If you document the plan to failover systems to another location, you’ll have documented the core of your DR procedures. This differs from traditional scenario planning where you define separate plans for different what-if scenarios. The goal is one plan that can be adapted to different scenarios, which reduces the effort to build and maintain your DRP.

    Conduct a tabletop planning exercise to outline DR procedures in your current environment

    3(a) Tabletop planning

    Estimated Time: 2-3 hours

    For each high-level recovery step, do the following:

    1. On white cue cards:
      • Record the step.
      • Indicate the task owner (if required for clarity).
      • Note time required to complete the step. After the exercise, use this to build a running recovery time where 00:00 is when the incident occurred.
    2. On yellow cue cards, document gaps in people, process, and technology requirements to complete the step.
    3. On red cue cards, indicate risks (e.g. no backup person for a key staff member).
    An example is shown on what can be done during step 3(a). Three cue cards are showing in white, yellow, and red.

    Do:

    • Review the complete workflow from notification all the way to user acceptance testing.
    • Keep focused; stay on task and on time.
    • Revisit each step and record gaps and risks (and known solutions, but don’t dwell on this).
    • Revise and improve the plan with task owners.

    Don't:

    • Get weighed down by tools.
    • Document the details right away – stick to the high-level plan for the first exercise.
    • Try to find solutions to every gap/risk as you go. Save in-depth research/discussion for later.

    Flowchart the current-state incident response plan (i.e. document the recovery workflow)

    3(b) DRP Recovery Workflow Template and Case Study: Practical, Right-Sized DRP

    Why use flowcharts?

    • Flowcharts provide an at-a-glance view, ideal for disaster scenarios where pressure is high and quick upward communication is necessary.
    • For experienced staff, a high-level reminder of key steps is sufficient.

    Use the completed tabletop planning exercise results to build this workflow.

    "We use flowcharts for our declaration procedures. Flowcharts are more effective when you have to explain status and next steps to upper management." – Assistant Director, IT Operations, Healthcare Industry

    Source: Info-Tech Research Group Interview

    Screenshot of Info-Tech's DRP Recovery Workflow Template

    For a formatted template you can use to capture your plan, see Info-Tech’s DRP Recovery Workflow Template.

    For a completed example of tabletop planning results, review Info-Tech’s Case Study: Practical, Right-Sized DRP.

    Identify RPA

    What’s my RPA? Consider the following case:

    • Once a week, a full backup is taken of the complete ERP system and is transferred over the WAN to a secondary site 250 miles away, where it is stored on disk.
    • Overnight, an incremental backup is taken of the day’s changes, and is transferred to the same secondary site, and also stored on disk.
    • During office hours, the SAN takes a snapshot of changes which are kept on local storage (information on the accounting system usually only changes during office hours).
    • So what’s the RPA? One hour (snapshots), one day (incrementals), or one week (full backups)?

    When identifying RPA, remember the following:

    You are planning for a disaster scenario, where on-site systems may be inaccessible and any copies of data taken during the disaster may fail, be corrupt, or never make it out of the data center (e.g. if the network fails before the backup file ships). In the scenario above, it seems likely that off-site incremental backups could be restored, leading to a 24-hour RPA. However, if there were serious concerns about the reliability of the daily incrementals, the RPA could arguably be based on the weekly full backups.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    The RPA is a commitment to the maximum data you would lose in a DR scenario with current capabilities (people, process, and technology). Pick a number you can likely achieve. List any situations where you couldn’t meet this RPA, and identify those for a risk tolerance discussion. In the example above, complete loss of the primary SAN would also mean losing the snapshots, so the last good copy of the data could be up to 24-hours old.

    Add recovery actuals (RTA/RPA) to your copy of the BIA

    3(c) DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool– Recovery actuals

    On the “Impact Analysis” tab in the DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool, enter the estimated maximum downtime and data loss in the RTA and RPA columns.

    1. Estimate the RTA based on the required time for complete recovery. Review your recovery workflow to identify this timeline. For example, if the notification, assessment, and declaration process takes two hours, and systems recovery requires most of a day, the estimated RTA could be 24 hours.
    2. Estimate the RPA based on the longest interval between copies of the data being shipped offsite. For example, if data on a particular system is backed up offsite once per day, and the onsite system was destroyed just before that backup began, the entire day’s data could be lost and estimated RPA could be 24 hours. Note: Enter 9999 to indicate that data is unrecoverable.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool – Recovery actuals

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    It’s okay to round numbers to the nearest shift, day, or week for simplicity (e.g. 24 hours rather than 22.5 hours, or 8 hours rather than 7.25 hours).

    Test the recovery workflow against additional scenarios

    3(d) Workflow review

    Estimated Time: 1 hour

    Review your recovery workflow with a different scenario in mind.

    • Work from and update the soft copy of your recovery workflow.
    • Would any steps be different if the scenario changes? If yes, capture the different flow with a decision diamond. Identify any new gaps or risks you encounter with red and yellow cards. Use as few decision diamonds as possible.

    Screenshot of testing the workflow against the additional scenarios

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    As you start to consider scenarios where injuries or loss of life are a possibility, remember that health and safety risks are the top priority in a crisis. If there’s a fire in the data center, evacuating the building is the first priority, even if that means foregoing a graceful shut down. For more details on emergency response and crisis management, see Implement Crisis Management Best Practices.

    Consider additional IT disaster scenarios

    3(e) Thought experiment – Review additional scenarios

    Walk through your recovery workflow in the context of additional, different scenarios to ensure there are no gaps. Collaborate with your DR team to identify changes that might be required, and incorporate these changes in the plan.

    Scenario Type Considerations
    Isolated hardware/software failure
    • Failover to the DR site may not be necessary (or only for affected systems).
    Power outage or network outage
    • Do you have standby power? Do you have network redundancy?
    Local hazard (e.g. chemical leak, police incident)
    • Systems might be accessible remotely, but hands-on maintenance will be required eventually.
    • An alternate site is required for service continuity.
    Equipment/building damage (e.g. fire, roof collapse)
    • Staff injuries or loss of life are a possibility.
    • Equipment may need repair or replacement (vendor involvement).
    • An alternate site is required for service continuity.
    Regional natural disasters
    • Staff injuries or loss of life are a possibility.
    • Utilities may be affected (power, running water, etc.).
    • Expect staff to take care of their families first before work.
    • A geographically distant alternate site may be required for service continuity.

    Step 3.2: Identify and Prioritize Projects to Close Gaps

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Analyze the gaps that were identified from the maturity scorecard, tabletop planning exercise, and the RTO/RPO gaps analysis.
    • Brainstorm solutions to close gaps and mitigate risks.
    • Determine a course of action to close these gaps. Prioritize each project. Create a project implementation timeline.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • DRP Coordinator
    • IT Infrastructure SMEs

    Results and Insights

    • Prioritized list of projects and action items that can improve DR capabilities.
    • Often low-cost, low-effort quick wins are identified to mitigate at least some gaps/risks. Higher-cost, higher-effort projects can be part of a longer-term IT strategy. Improving service continuity is an ongoing commitment.

    Brainstorm solutions to address gaps and risk

    3(f) Solutioning

    Estimated Time: 1.5 hours

    1. Review each of the risk and gap cards from the tabletop exercise.
    2. As a group, brainstorm ideas to address gaps, mitigate risks, and improve resiliency. Write the list of ideas on a whiteboard or flip-chart paper. The solutions can range from quick-wins and action items to major capital investments.
    3. Try to avoid debates about feasibility at this point – that should happen later. The goal is to get all ideas on the board.

    An example of how to complete Activity 3(f). Three cue cards showing various steps are attached by arrows to steps on a whiteboard.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    It’s about finding ways to solve the problem, not about solving the problem. When you’re brainstorming solutions to problems, don’t stop with the first idea, even if the solution seems obvious. The first idea isn’t always the best or only solution; other ideas can expand on and improve that first idea.

    Select an optimal DR deployment model from a world of choice

    There are many options for a DR deployment. What makes sense for you?

    • Sifting through the options for a DR site can be overwhelming. Simplify by eliminating deployment models that aren’t a good fit for your requirements or organization using Info-Tech’s research.
    • Someone will ask you about DR in the cloud. Cut to the chase and evaluate cloud for fit with your organization’s current capabilities and requirements. Read about the 10 Secrets for Successful DR in the Cloud.
    • Selecting and deploying a DR site is an exercise in risk mitigation. IT’s role is to advise the business on options to address the risk of not having a DR site, including cost and effort estimates. The business must then decide how to manage risk. Build total cost of ownership (TCO) estimates and evaluate possible challenges and risks for each option.

    Is it practical to invest in greater geo-redundancy that meets RTOs and RPOs during a widespread event?

    Info-Tech suggests you consider events that impact both sites, and your risk tolerance for that impact. Outline the impact of downtime at a high level if both the primary and secondary site were affected. Research how often events severe enough to have impacted both your primary and secondary sites have occurred in the past. What’s the business tolerance for this type of event?

    A common strategy: have a primary and DR site that are close enough to support low RPO/RTO, but far enough away to mitigate the impact of known regional events. Back up data to a remote third location as protection against a catastrophic event.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Approach site selection as a project. Leverage Select an Optimal Disaster Recovery Deployment Model to structure your own site-selection project.

    Set up the DRP Roadmap Tool

    3(g) DRP Roadmap Tool – Set up tool

    Use the DRP Roadmap Tool to create a high-level roadmap to plan and communicate DR action items and initiatives. Determine the data you’ll use to define roadmap items.

    Screenshot of Info-Tech's DRP Roadmap Tool

    Plan next steps by estimating timeline, effort, priority, and more

    3(h) DRP Roadmap Tool – Describe roadmap items

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's DRP Roadmap Tool to show how to describe roadmap items

    Review and communicate the DRP Roadmap Tool

    3(i) DRP Roadmap Tool – View roadmap chart

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's DRP Roadmap Tool's Roadmap tab

    Step 3.3: Review the Future State Recovery Process

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Update the recovery workflow to outline your future recovery procedure.
    • Summarize findings from DR exercises and present the results to the project sponsor and other interested executives.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • DRP Coordinator
    • IT SMEs (Future State Recovery Flow)
    • DR Project Sponsor

    Results and Insights

    • Summarize results from DR planning exercises to make the case for needed DR investment.

    Outline your future state recovery flow

    3(j) Update the recovery workflow to outline response and recovery in the future

    Estimated Time: 30 minutes

    Outline your expected future state recovery flow to demonstrate improvements once projects and action items have been completed.

    1. Create a copy of your DRP recovery workflow in a new tab in Visio.
    2. Delete gap and risk cards that are addressed by proposed projects. Consolidate or eliminate steps that would be simplified or streamlined in the future if projects are implemented.
    3. Create a short-, medium-, and long-term review of changes to illustrate improvements over time to the project roadmap.
    4. Update this workflow as you implement and improve DR capabilities.

    Screenshot of the recovery workflow

    Validate recovery targets and communicate actual recovery capabilities

    3(k) Validate findings, present recommendations, secure budget

    Estimated Time: time required will vary

    1. Interview managers or process owners to validate RTO, RPO, and business impact scores.Use your assessment of “heavy users” of particular applications (picture at right) to remind you which business users you should include in the interview process.
    2. Present an overview of your findings to the management team.Use Info-Tech’s DRP Recap and Results Template to summarize your findings.
    3. Take projects into the budget process.With the management team aware of the rationale for investment in DRP, build the business case and secure budget where needed.

    Present DRP findings and make the case for needed investment

    3(I) DRP Recap and Results Template

    Create a communication deck to recap key findings for stakeholders.

    • Write a clear problem statement. Identify why you did this project (what problem you’re solving).
    • Clearly state key findings, insights, and recommendations.
    • Leverage the completed tools and templates to populate the deck. Callouts throughout the template presentation will direct you to take and populate screenshots throughout the document.
    • Use the presentation to communicate key findings to, and gather feedback from, business unit managers, executives, and IT staff.
    Screenshots of Info-Tech's DRP Recap and Results Template

    Stories from the field: Info-Tech clients find value in Phase 3 in the following ways

    Tabletop planning is an effective way to discover gaps in recovery capabilities. Identify issues in the tabletop exercise so you can manage them before disaster strikes. For example:

    Back up a second…

    A client started to back up application data offsite. To minimize data transfer and storage costs, the systems themselves weren’t backed up. Working through the restore process at the DR site, the DBA realized 30 years of COBOL and SQR code – critical business functionality – wasn’t backed up offsite.

    Net… work?

    A 500-employee professional services firm realized its internet connection could be a significant roadblock to recovery. Without internet, no one at head office could access critical cloud systems. The tabletop exercise identified this recovery bottleneck and helped prioritize the fix on the roadmap.

    Someone call a doctor!

    Hospitals rely on their phone systems for system downtime procedures. A tabletop exercise with a hospital client highlighted that if the data center were damaged, the phone system would likely be damaged as well. Identifying this provided more urgency to the ongoing VOIP migration.

    The test of time

    A small municipality relied on a local MSP to perform systems restore, but realized it had never tested the restore procedure to identify RTA. Contacting the MSP to review capabilities became a roadmap item to address this risk.

    Phase 3: Insights and accomplishments

    Screenshot of Info-Tech's DRP recovery workflow template

    Outlined the DRP response and risks to recovery

    Screenshots of activities completed related to brainstorming risk mitigation measures.

    Brainstormed risk mitigation measures

    Summary of Accomplishments

    • Planned and documented your DR incident response and systems recovery workflow.
    • Identified gaps and risks to recovery and incident management.
    • Brainstormed and identified projects and action items to mitigate risks and close gaps.

    Up Next: Leverage the core deliverables to complete, extend, and maintain your DRP

    Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan

    Phase 4

    Complete, Extend, and Maintain Your DRP

    Phase 4: Complete, Extend, and Maintain Your DRP

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify progress made on your DRP by reassessing your DRP maturity.
    • Prioritize the highest value major initiatives to complete, extend, and maintain your DRP.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • DRP Coordinator
    • Executive Sponsor

    Results and Insights

    • Communicate the value of your DRP by demonstrating progress against items in the DRP Maturity Scorecard.
    • Identify and prioritize future major initiatives to support the DRP, and the larger BCP.

    Celebrate accomplishments, plan for the future

    Congratulations! You’ve completed the core DRP deliverables and made the case for investment in DR capabilities. Take a moment to celebrate your accomplishments.

    This milestone is an opportunity to look back and look forward.

    • Look back: measure your progress since you started to build your DRP. Revisit the assessments completed in phase 1, and assess the change in your overall DRP maturity.
    • Look forward: prioritize future initiatives to complete, extend, and maintain your DRP. Prioritize initiatives that are the highest impact for the least requirement of effort and resources.

    We have completed the core DRP methodology for key systems:

    • BIA, recovery objectives, high-level recovery workflow, and recovery actuals.
    • Identify key tasks to meet recovery objectives.

    What could we do next?

    • Repeat the core methodology for additional systems.
    • Identify a DR site to meet recovery requirements, and review vendor DR capabilities.
    • Create a summary DRP document including requirements, capabilities, and change procedures.
    • Create a test plan and detailed recovery documentation.
    • Coordinate the creation of BCPs.
    • Integrate DR in other key operational processes.

    Revisit the DRP Maturity Scorecard to measure progress and identify remaining areas to improve

    4(a) DRP Maturity Scorecard – Reassess your DRP program maturity

    1. Find the copy of the DRP Maturity Scorecard you completed previously. Save a second copy of the completed scorecard in the same folder.
    2. Update scoring where you have improved your DRP documentation or capabilities.
    3. Review the new scores on tab 3. Compare the new scores to the original scores.

    Screenshot of DRP Maturity Assessment Results

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Use the completed, updated DRP Maturity Scorecard to demonstrate the value of your continuity program, and to help you decide where to focus next.

    Prioritize major initiatives to complete, extend, and maintain the DRP

    4(b) Prioritize major initiatives

    Estimated Time: 2 hours

    Prioritize major initiatives that mitigate significant risk with the least cost and effort.

    1. Use the scoring criteria below to evaluate risk, effort, and cost for potential initiatives. Modify the criteria if required for your organization. Write this out on a whiteboard or flip-chart paper.
    2. Assign a score from 1 to 3. Multiply the scores for each initiative together for an aggregate score. In general, prioritize initiatives with higher scores.
    Score A: How significant are the risks this initiative will mitigate? B: How easily can we complete this initiative? C: How cost-effective is this initiative?
    3: High Critical impact on +50% of stakeholders, or major impact to compliance posture, or significant health/safety risk. One sprint, can be completed by a few individuals with minor supervision. Within the IT discretionary budget.
    2: Medium Impacts <50% of stakeholders, or minor impact on compliance, or degradation to health or safety controls. One quarter, and/or some increased effort required, some risk to completion. Requires budget approval from finance.
    1: Low Impacts limited to <25% of stakeholders, no impact on compliance posture or health/safety. One year, and/or major vendor or organizational challenges. Requires budget approval from the board of directors.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    You can use a similar scoring exercise to prioritize and schedule high-benefit, low-effort, low-cost items identified in the roadmap in phase 3.

    Example: Prioritize major initiatives

    4(b) Prioritize major initiatives continued

    Write out the table on a whiteboard (record the results in a spreadsheet for reference). In the case below, IT might decide to work on repeating the core methodology first as they create the active testing plans, and tackle process changes later.

    Initiative A: How significant are the risks this initiative will mitigate? B: How easily can we complete this initiative? C: How cost-effective is this initiative? Aggregate score (A x B x C)
    Repeat the core methodology for all systems 2 – will impact some stakeholders, no compliance or safety impact. 2 – will require about 3 months, no significant complications. 3 – No cost. 12
    Add DR to project mgmt. and change mgmt. 1 – Mitigates some recovery risks over the long term. 1 – Requires extensive consultation and process review. 3 – No cost. 3
    Active failover testing on plan 2 – Mitigates some risks; documentation and cross training is already in place. 2 – Requires 3-4 months of occasional effort to prepare for test. 2 – May need to purchase some equipment before testing. 8

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Find a pace that allows you to keep momentum going, but also leaves enough time to act on the initial findings, projects, and action items identified in the DRP Roadmap Tool. Include these initiatives in the Roadmap tool to visualize how identified initiatives fit with other tasks identified to improve your recovery capabilities.

    Repeat the core DR methodology for additional systems and applications


    You have created a DR plan for your most critical systems. Now, add the rest:

    • Build on the work you’ve already done. Re-use the BIA scoring scale. Update your existing recovery workflows, rather than creating and formatting an entirely new document. A number of steps in the recovery will be shared with, or similar to, the recovery procedures for your Tier 1 systems.

    Risks and Challenges Mitigated

    • DR requirements and capabilities for less-critical systems have not been evaluated.
    • Gaps in the recovery process for less critical systems have not been evaluated or addressed.
    • DR capabilities for less critical systems may not meet business requirements.
    Sample Outputs
    Add Tier 2 & 3 systems to the BIA.
    Complete another tabletop exercise for Tier 2 & 3 systems recovery, and add the results to the recovery workflow.
    Identify projects to close additional gaps in the recovery process. Add projects to the project roadmap.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Use this example of a complete, practical, right-size DR plan to drive and guide your efforts.

    Extend your core DRP deliverables

    You’ve completed the core DRP deliverables. Continue to create DRP documentation to support recovery procedures and governance processes:

    • DR documentation efforts fail when organizations try to boil the ocean with an all-in-one plan aimed at auditors, business leaders, and IT. It’s long, hard to maintain, and ends up as shelfware.
    • Create documentation in layers to keep it manageable. Build supporting documentation over time to support your high-level recovery workflow.

    Risks and Challenges Mitigated

    • Key contact information, escalation, and disaster declaration responsibilities are not identified or formalized.
    • DRP requirements and capabilities aren’t centralized. Key DRP findings are in multiple documents, complicating governance and oversight by auditors, executives, and board members.
    • Detailed recovery procedures and peripheral information (e.g. network diagrams) are not documented.
    Sample Outputs
    Three to five detailed systems recovery flowcharts/checklists.
    Documented team roles, succession plans, and contact information.
    Notification, assessment, and disaster declaration plan.
    DRP summary.
    Layer 1, 2 & 3 network diagrams.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Use this example of a complete, practical, right-size DR plan to drive and guide your efforts.

    Select an optimal DR deployment model and deployment site

    Your DR site has been identified as inadequate:

    • Begin with the end in mind. Commit to mastering the selected model and leverage your vendor relationship for effective DR.
    • Cut to the chase and evaluate the feasibility of cloud first. Gauge your organization’s current capabilities for DR in the cloud before becoming infatuated with the idea.
    • A mixed model gives you the best of both worlds. Diversify your strategy by identifying fit for purpose and balancing the work required to maintain various models.

    Risks and Challenges Mitigated

    • Without an identified DR site, you’ll be scrambling when a disaster hits to find and contract for a location to restore IT services.
    • Without systems and application data backed up offsite, you stand to lose critical business data and logic if all copies of the data at your primary site were lost.
    Sample Outputs
    Application assessment for cloud DR.
    TCO tool for different environments.
    Solution decision and executive presentation.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Use Info-Tech’s blueprint, Select the Optimal Disaster Recovery Deployment Model, to help you make sense of a world of choice for your DR site.

    Extend DRP findings to business process resiliency with a BCP pilot

    Integrate your findings from DRP into the overall BCP:

    • As an IT leader you have the skillset and organizational knowledge to lead a BCP project, but ultimately business leaders need to own the BCP – they know their processes and requirements to resume business operations better than anyone else.
    • The traditional approach to BCP is a massive project that most organizations can’t execute without hiring a consultant. To execute BCP in-house, carve up the task into manageable pieces.

    Risks and Challenges Mitigated

    • No formal plan exists to recover from a disruption to critical business processes.
    • Business requirements for IT systems recovery may change following a comprehensive review of business continuity requirements.
    • Outside of core systems recovery, IT could be involved in relocating staff, imaging and issuing new end-user equipment, etc. Identifying these requirements is part of BCP.
    Sample Outputs
    Business process-focused BIA for one business unit.
    Recovery workflows for one business unit.
    Provisioning list for one business unit.
    BCP project roadmap.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Use Info-Tech’s blueprint, Develop a Business Continuity Plan, to develop and deploy a repeatable BCP methodology.

    Test the plan to validate capabilities and cross-train staff on recovery procedures

    You don’t have a program to regularly test the DR plan:

    • Most DR tests are focused solely on the technology and not the DR management process – which is where most plans fail.
    • Be proactive – establish an annual test cycle and identify and coordinate resources well in advance.
    • Update DRP documentation with findings from the plan, and track the changes you make over time.

    Risks and Challenges Mitigated

    • Gaps likely still exist in the plan that are hard to find without some form of testing.
    • Customers and auditors may ask for some form of DR testing.
    • Staff may not be familiar with DR documentation or how they can use it.
    • No formal cycle to validate and update the DRP.
    Sample Outputs
    DR testing readiness assessment.
    Testing handbooks.
    Test plan summary template.
    DR test issue log and analysis tool.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Uncover deficiencies in your recovery procedures by using Info-Tech’s blueprint Reduce Costly Downtime Through DR Testing.

    “Operationalize” DRP management

    Inject DR planning in key operational processes to support plan maintenance:

    • Major changes, or multiple routine changes, can materially alter DR capabilities and requirements. It’s not feasible to update the DR plan after every routine change, so leverage criticality tiers in the BIA to focus your change management efforts. Critical systems require more rigorous change procedures.
    • Likewise, you can build criticality tiers into more focused project management and performance measurement processes.
    • Schedule regular tasks in your ticketing system to verify capabilities and cross-train staff on key recovery procedures (e.g. backup and restore).

    Risks and Challenges Mitigated

    • DRP is not updated “as needed” – as requirements and capabilities change due to business and technology changes.
    • The DRP is disconnected from day-to-day operations.
    Sample Outputs
    Reviewed and updated change, project, and performance management processes.
    Reviewed and updated internal SLAs.
    Reviewed and updated data protection and backup procedures.

    Review infrastructure service provider DR capabilities

    Insert DR planning in key operational processes to support plan maintenance:

    • Reviewing vendor DR capabilities is a core IT vendor management competency.
    • As your DR requirements change year-to-year, ensure your vendors’ service commitments still meet your DR requirements.
    • Identify changes in the vendor’s service offerings and DR capabilities, e.g. higher costs for additional DR support, new offerings to reduce potential downtime, or conversely, a degradation in DR capabilities.

    Risks and Challenges Mitigated

    • Vendor capabilities haven’t been measured against business requirements.
    • No internal capability exists currently to assess vendor ability to meet promised SLAs.
    • No internal capability exists to track vendor performance on recoverability.
    Sample Outputs
    A customized vendor DRP questionnaire.
    Reviewed vendor SLAs.
    Choose to keep or change service levels or vendor offerings based on findings.

    Phase 4: Insights and accomplishments

    Screenshot of DRP Maturity Assessment Results

    Identified progress against targets

    Screenshot of prioritized further initiatives.

    Prioritized further initiatives

    Screenshot of DRP Planning Roadmap

    Added initiatives to the roadmap

    Summary of Accomplishments

    • Developed a list of high-priority initiatives that can support the extension and maintenance of the DR plan over the long term.
    • Reviewed and update maturity assessments to establish progress and communicate the value of the DR program.

    Summary of accomplishment

    Knowledge Gained

    • Conduct a BIA to determine appropriate targets for RTOs and RPOs.
    • Identify DR projects required to close RTO/RPO gaps and mitigate risks.
    • Use tabletop planning to create and validate an incident response plan.

    Processes Optimized

    • Your DRP process was optimized, from BIA to documenting an incident response plan.
    • Your vendor evaluation process was optimized to identify and assess a vendor’s ability to meet your DR requirements, and to repeat this evaluation on an annual basis.

    Deliverables Completed

    • DRP Maturity Scorecard
    • DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool
    • DRP Roadmap Tool
    • Incident response plan and systems recovery workflow
    • Executive presentation

    Info-Tech’s insights bust the most obstinate myths of DRP

    Myth #1: DRPs need to focus on major events such as natural disasters and other highly destructive incidents such as fire and flood.

    Reality: The most common threats to service continuity are hardware and software failures, network outages, and power outages.

    Myth #2: Effective DRPs start with identifying and evaluating potential risks.

    Reality: DR isn’t about identifying risks; it’s about ensuring service continuity.

    Myth #3: DRPs are separate from day-to-day operations and incident management.

    Reality: DR must be integrated with service management to ensure service continuity.

    Myth #4: I use a co-lo or cloud services so I don’t have to worry about DR. That’s my vendor’s responsibility.

    Reality: You can’t outsource accountability. You can’t just assume your vendor’s DR capabilities will meet your needs.

    Myth #5: A DRP must include every detail so anyone can execute the recovery.

    Reality: IT DR is not an airplane disaster movie. You aren’t going to ask a business user to execute a system recovery, just like you wouldn’t really want a passenger with no flying experience to land a plane.

    Supplement the core documentation with these tools and templates

    • An Excel workbook workbook to track key roles on DR, business continuity, and emergency response teams. Can also track DR documentation location and any hardware purchases required for DR.
    • A questionnaire template and a response tracking tool to structure your investigation of vendor DR capabilities.
    • Integrate escalation with your DR plan by defining incident severity and escalation rules . Use this example as a template or integrate ideas into your own severity definitions and escalation rules in your incident management procedures.
    • A minute-by-minute time-tracking tool to capture progress in a DR or testing scenario. Monitor progress against objectives in real time as recovery tasks are started and completed.

    Next steps: Related Info-Tech research

    Select the Optimal Disaster Recovery Deployment Model Evaluate cloud, co-lo, and on-premises disaster recovery deployment models.

    Develop a Business Continuity Plan Streamline the traditional approach to make BCP development manageable and repeatable.

    Prepare for a DRP Audit Assess your current DRP maturity, identify required improvements, and complete an audit-ready DRP summary document.

    Document and Maintain Your Disaster Recovery Plan Put your DRP on a diet: keep it fit, trim, and ready for action.

    Reduce Costly Downtime Through DR Testing Improve your DR plan and your team’s ability to execute on it.

    Implement Crisis Management Best Practices An effective crisis response minimizes the impact of a crisis on reputation, profitability, and continuity.

    Research contributors and experts

    • Alan Byrum, Director of Business Continuity, Intellitech
    • Bernard Jones (MBCI, CBCP, CORP, ITILv3), Owner/Principal, B Jones BCP Consulting, LLC
    • Paul Beaudry, Assistant Vice-President, Technical Services, MIS, Richardson International Limited
    • Yogi Schulz, President, Corvelle Consulting

    Glossary

    • Business Continuity Management (BCM) Program: Ongoing management and governance process supported by top management and appropriately resourced to implement and maintain business continuity management. (Source: ISO 22301:2012)
    • Business Continuity Plan (BCP): Documented procedures that guide organizations to respond, recover, resume, and restore to a pre-defined level of operation following disruption. The BCP is not necessarily one document, but a collection of procedures and information.
    • Crisis: A situation with a high level of uncertainty that disrupts the core activities and/or credibility of an organization and requires urgent action. (Source: ISO 22300)
    • Crisis Management Team (CMT): A group of individuals responsible for developing and implementing a comprehensive plan for responding to a disruptive incident. The team consists of a core group of decision makers trained in incident management and prepared to respond to any situation.
    • Disaster Recovery Planning (DRP): The activities associated with the continuing availability and restoration of the IT infrastructure.
    • Incident: An event that has the capacity to lead to loss of, or a disruption to, an organization’s operations, services, or functions – which, if not managed, can escalate into an emergency, crisis, or disaster.
    • BCI Editor’s Note: In most countries “incident” and “crisis” are used interchangeably, but in the UK the term “crisis” has been generally reserved for dealing with wide-area incidents involving Emergency Services. The BCI prefers the use of “incident” for normal BCM purposes. (Source: The Business Continuity Institute)

    • Incident Management Plan: A clearly defined and documented plan of action for use at the time of an incident, typically covering the key personnel, resources, services, and actions needed to implement the incident management process.
    • IT Disaster: A service interruption requiring IT to rebuild a service, restore from backups, or activate redundancy at the backup site.
    • Recovery Point: Time elapsed between the last good copy of the data being taken and failure/corruption on the production environment; think of this as data loss.
    • Recovery Point Actual (RPA): The currently achievable recovery point after a disaster event, given existing people, processes, and technology. This reflects expected maximum data loss that could actually occur in a disaster scenario.
    • Recovery Point Objective (RPO): The target recovery point after a disaster event, usually calculated in hours, on a given system, application, or service. Think of this as acceptable and appropriate data loss. RPO should be based on a business impact analysis (BIA) to identify an acceptable and appropriate recovery target.
    • Recovery Time: Time required to restore a system, application, or service to a functional state; think of this as downtime.
    • Recovery Time Actual (RTA): The currently achievable recovery time after a disaster event, given existing people, processes, and technology. This reflects expected maximum downtime that could actually occur in a disaster scenario.
    • Recovery Time Objective (RTO): The target recovery time after a disaster event for a given system, application, or service. RTO should be based on a business impact analysis (BIA) to identify acceptable and appropriate downtime.

    Bibliography

    BCMpedia. “Recovery Objectives: RTO, RPO, and MTPD.” BCMpedia, n.d. Web.

    Burke, Stephen. “Public Cloud Pitfalls: Microsoft Azure Storage Cluster Loses Power, Puts Spotlight On Private, Hybrid Cloud Advantages.” CRN, 16 Mar. 2017. Web.

    Elliot, Stephen. “DevOps and the Cost of Downtime: Fortune 1000 Best Practice Metrics Quantified.” IDC, 2015. Web.

    FEMA. Planning & Templates. FEMA, 2015. Web.

    FINRA. “Business Continuity Plans and Emergency Contact Information.” FINRA, 2015. Web.

    FINRA. “FINRA, the SEC and CFTC Issue Joint Advisory on Business Continuity Planning.” FINRA, 2013. Web.

    Gosling, Mel, and Andrew Hiles. “Business Continuity Statistics: Where Myth Meets Fact.” Continuity Central, 2009. Web.

    Hanwacker, Linda. “COOP Templates for Success Workbook.” The LSH Group, n.d. Web.

    Homeland Security. Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA). Homeland Security, 2015. Web.

    Nichols, Shaun. “AWS's S3 Outage Was So Bad Amazon Couldn't Get Into Its Own Dashboard to Warn the World.” The Register, 1 Mar. 2017. Web.

    Potter, Patrick. “BCM Regulatory Alphabet Soup.” RSA Archer Organization, 2012. Web.

    Rothstein, Philip Jan. “Disaster Recovery Testing: Exercising Your Contingency Plan.” Rothstein Associates Inc., 2007. Web.

    The Business Continuity Institute. “The Good Practice Guidelines.” The Business Continuity Institute, 2013. Web.

    The Disaster Recovery Journal. “Disaster Resource Guide.” The Disaster Recovery Journal, 2015. Web.

    The Disaster Recovery Journal. “DR Rules & Regulations.” The Disaster Recovery Journal, 2015. Web.

    The Federal Financial Institution Examination Council (FFIEC). Business Continuity Planning. IT Examination Handbook InfoBase, 2015. Web.

    York, Kyle. “Read Dyn’s Statement on the 10/21/2016 DNS DDoS Attack.” Oracle, 22 Oct. 2016. Web.

    Drive Digital Transformation With Platform Strategies

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}78|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 8.5/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $3,750 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 4 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: IT Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /it-strategy
    • Enterprise is grappling with the challenges of existing business models and strategies not leading to desired outcomes.
    • Enterprise is struggling to remain competitive.
    • Enterprise wants to understand how to leverage platform strategies and a digital platform.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    To remain competitive enterprises must renew and refresh their business model strategies and design/develop digital platforms – this requires enterprises to:

    • Understand how digital-native enterprises are using platform business models and associated strategies.
    • Understand their core assets and strengths and how these can be leveraged for transformation.
    • Understand the core characteristics and components of a digital platform so that they can design digital platform(s) for their enterprise.
    • Ask if the client’s digital transformation (DX) strategy is aligned with a digital platform enablement strategy.
    • Ask if the enterprise has paid attention to the structure, culture, principles, and practices of platform teams.

    Impact and Result

    Organizations that implement this project will gain benefits in five ways:

    • Awareness and understanding of various platform strategies.
    • Application of specific platform strategies within the context of the enterprise.
    • Awareness of their existing business mode, core assets, value proposition, and strengths.
    • Alignment between DX themes and platform enablement themes so enterprises can develop roadmaps that gauge successful DX.
    • Design of a digital platform, including characteristics, components, and team characteristics, culture, principles, and practices.

    Drive Digital Transformation With Platform Strategies Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should consider the platform business model and a digital platform to remain competitive.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Set goals for your platform business model

    Understand the platform business model and strategies and then set your platform business model goals.

    • Drive Digital Transformation With Platform Strategies – Phase 1: Set Goals for Your Platform Business Model
    • Business Platform Playbook

    2. Configure digital platform

    Define design goals for your digital platform. Align your DX strategy with digital platform capabilities and understand key components of the digital platform.

    • Drive Digital Transformation With Platform Strategies – Phase 2: Configure Your Digital Platform
    • Digital Platform Playbook
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Drive Digital Transformation With Platform Strategies

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Understand Platform Business Model and Strategies

    The Purpose

    Understand existing business model, value proposition, and key assets.

    Understand platform business model and strategies.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understanding the current assets helps with knowing what can be leveraged in the new business model/transformation.

    Understanding the platform strategies can help the enterprise renew/refresh their business model.

    Activities

    1.1 Document the current business model along with value proposition and key assets (that provide competitive advantage).

    1.2 Transformation narrative.

    1.3 Platform model canvas.

    1.4 Document the platform strategies in the context of the enterprise.

    Outputs

    Documentation of current business model along with value proposition and key assets (that provide competitive advantage).

    Documentation of the selected platform strategies.

    2 Planning for Platform Business Model

    The Purpose

    Understand transformation approaches.

    Understand various layers of platforms.

    Ask fundamental and evolutionary questions about the platform.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understanding of the transformational model so that the enterprise can realize the differences.

    Understanding of the organization’s strengths and weaknesses for a DX.

    Extraction of strategic themes to plan and develop a digital platform roadmap.

    Activities

    2.1 Discuss and document decision about DX approach and next steps.

    2.2 Discuss and document high-level strategic themes for platform business model and associated roadmap.

    Outputs

    Documented decision about DX approach and next steps.

    Documented high-level strategic themes for platform business model and associated roadmap.

    3 Digital Platform Strategy

    The Purpose

    Understand the design goals for the digital platform.

    Understand gaps between the platform’s capabilities and the DX strategy.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Design goals set for the digital platform that are visible to all stakeholders.

    Gap analysis performed between enterprise’s digital strategy and platform capabilities; this helps understand the current situation and thus informs strategies and roadmaps.

    Activities

    3.1 Discuss and document design goals for digital platform.

    3.2 Discuss DX themes and platform capabilities – document the gaps.

    3.3 Discuss gaps and strategies along with timelines.

    Outputs

    Documented design goals for digital platform.

    Documented DX themes and platform capabilities.

    DX themes and platform capabilities map.

    4 Digital Platform Design: Key Components

    The Purpose

    Understanding of key components of a digital platform, including technology and teams.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understanding of the key components of a digital platform and designing the platform.

    Understanding of the team structure, culture, and practices needed for successful platform engineering teams.

    Activities

    4.1 Confirmation and discussion on existing UX/UI and API strategies.

    4.2 Understanding of microservices architecture and filling of microservices canvas.

    4.3 Real-time stream processing data pipeline and tool map.

    4.4 High-level architectural view.

    4.5 Discussion on platform engineering teams, including culture, structure, principles, and practices.

    Outputs

    Filled microservices canvas.

    Documented real-time stream processing data pipeline and tool map.

    Documented high-level architectural view.

    Streamline Application Management

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}403|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.5/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $64,272 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 40 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Maintenance
    • Parent Category Link: /maintenance
    • Today’s rapidly scaling and increasingly complex products create mounting pressure on delivery teams to release new features and changes quickly and with sufficient quality.
    • Many organizations lack the critical management capabilities to balance maintenance with new development and ensure high product value.
    • Application management is often viewed as a support function rather than an enabler of business growth. Focus and investments are only placed on management when it becomes a problem.
    • The lack of governance and practice accountability leaves application management in a chaotic state: politics take over, resources are not strategically allocated, and customers are frustrated.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • New features, fixes, and enhancements are all treated the same and managed in a single backlog. Teams need to focus on prioritizing their efforts on what is valuable to the organization, not to a single department.
    • Business integration is not optional. The business (i.e. product owners) must be represented in guiding delivery efforts and performing ongoing validation and verification of new features and changes.

    Impact and Result

    • Justify the necessity to optimize application management. Gain a grounded understanding of stakeholder objectives and validate their achievability against the current maturity of application management.
    • Strengthen backlog management practices. Obtain a holistic picture of the business and technical impacts, risks, value, complexity, and urgency of each backlog item in order to justify its priority and relevance. Apply the appropriate management approach to each software product according to its criticality and value to the business.
    • Establish and govern a repeatable process. Develop a management process with well-defined steps, quality controls, and roles and responsibilities, and instill good practices to improve the success of delivery.

    Streamline Application Management Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should sustain your application management practice, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Define your priorities

    State the success criteria of your application management practice through defined objectives and metrics. Assess your maturity.

    • Streamline Application Management – Phase 1: Define Your Priorities
    • Application Management Strategy Template
    • Application Management Maturity Assessment Tool

    2. Govern application management

    Structure your application management governance model with the right process and roles. Inject product ownership into your practice.

    • Streamline Application Management – Phase 2: Govern Application Management

    3. Build your optimization roadmap

    Build your application management optimization roadmap to achieve your target state.

    • Streamline Application Management – Phase 3: Build Your Optimization Roadmap
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Streamline Application Management

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Define Your Priorities

    The Purpose

    State the success criteria of your application management practice through defined objectives and metrics.

    Assess your maturity.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Grounded stakeholder expectations

    Application management maturity and identification of optimization opportunities

    Activities

    1.1 Set your objectives.

    1.2 Assess your maturity.

    Outputs

    Application management objectives and metrics

    Application management maturity and optimization opportunities

    2 Govern Application Management

    The Purpose

    Structure your application management governance model with the right process and roles.

    Inject product ownership into your practice.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Management approach aligned to product value and criticality

    Management techniques to govern the product backlog

    Target-state application management process and roles

    Activities

    2.1 Select your management approach.

    2.2 Manage your single product backlog.

    2.3 Optimize your management process.

    2.4 Define your management roles.

    Outputs

    Application management approach for each application

    Product backlog management practices

    Application management process

    Application management roles and responsibilities and communication flow

    3 Build Your Optimization Roadmap

    The Purpose

    Build your application management optimization roadmap to achieve your target state.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Optimization opportunities

    Application management optimization roadmap

    Activities

    3.1 Build your optimization roadmap.

    Outputs

    Application management optimization roadmap

    Contact Tymans Group

    We're here to get your IT performant and resilient

    We have the highest respect for your person. Tymans Group does not engage in predatory (our term) emailing practices. We contact you only with responses to your questions. Our company ethics insist on transparency and honesty.

    Continue reading

    What is resilience?

    Aside from the fact that operational resilience is mandated by law as of January 2025 (yes, next year), having your systems and applications available to your customers whenever they need your services is always a good idea. Customers, both existing and new ones, typically prefer smooth operations over new functionality. If you have any roadblocks in your current customer journey, then solving those is also part of operational resilience (and excellence).

    Does this mean you should not market new products or services? Of course not! Solving a customer journey roadblock is ensuring that your company is resilient. The Happy Meal is a prime example: it solved a product roadblock for small children and a profits roadblock for the company. For more info, just google it. But before you bring a new service online, be sure that it can withstand the punches that will be thrown at it. 

    What is resilience? 

    Resilience is the art of making sure your services are available to your customers whenever they can use them. Note I did not say 24/7/365. Your business may require that, but perhaps your systems need "only" to be available during "normal" business hours.

    Resilient systems can withstand adverse events that impair their ability to perform normal functions, and, like in the case the Happy Meals, increased peak demands. Events can include simple breakdowns (like a storage device, an internet connection that fails, or a file that fails to load) or something worse, like a cyber attack or a larger failure in your data center.

    Your client does not care what the cause is; what counts for the client is, "Can I access your service? (or buy that meal for my kid.)"

    Resilience entails several aspects:

    • availability
    • performance
    • right-sizing
    • hardening
    • restore-ability
    • testing
    • monitoring
    • management and governance

    It is now tempting to apply these aspects only to your organization's IT or technical parts. That is insufficient. Your operations, management, and even e.g. sales must ensure that services rendered result in happy clients and happy shareholders/owners. The reason is that resilient operations are a symphony. Not one single department or set of actions will achieve this. When you have product development working with the technical teams to develop a resilient flow at the right level for its earning potential, then you maximize profits.

    This synergy ensures that you invest exactly the right level of resources. There are no exaggerated technical or operational elements for ancillary services. That frees resources to ensure your main services receive the full attention they deserve.

    Resilience, in other words, is the result of a mindset and a way of operating that helps your business remain at the top of its game and provides a top service to clients while keeping the bottom line in the black. 

    Why do we need to spend on this?

    I mean, if it ain't broke, don't fix it. That old adage is true, and yet not. Services can remain up and running for a long time with single points of failure. But can you afford to have them break at any time? If yes, and your customers don't mind waiting for you to patch things up, then you can "risk-accept" that situation. But how realistic is that these days? If I cannot buy it at your shop today, I'll more than likely get it from another. If I'm in a contract with you, yet you cannot deliver, we will have a conversation, or at the very least, a moment of disappointment. If you have enough "disappointments," you will lose the customer. Lose enough customers, and you will have a reputational problem or worse.

    We don't like to spend resources on something that "may"go wrong. We do risk assessments to determine the true cost of non-delivery and the likelihood of that happening. And there are different ways to deal with that assessment's outcome. Not everything needs to have double the number of people working on it, just in case one resignes. Not every system needs an availability of 99,999%.

    But sometimes, we do not have a choice. When lives are at stake, like in medical or aviation services, being sorry is not a good starting point. The same goes for financial services. the DORA and NIS2 legislation in the EU, the CEA, FISMA, and GLBA in the US, and ESPA in Japan, to name a few, are legislations that require your company, if active in the relevant regulated sectors, to comply and ensure that your services continue to perform.

    Most of these elements have one thing in common: we need to know what is important for our service delivery and what is not.

    Business service

    That brings us to the core subject of what needs to be resilient. The answer is very short and very complex at the same time. It is the service that you offer to your customers which must meet reliance levels.

    Take the example of a hospital. When there is a power outage, the most critical systems must continue operating for a given period. That also means that sufficient capable staff must be present to operate said equipment; it even means that the paths leading to said hospital should remain available; if not by road, then, e.g., by helicopter. If these inroads are unavailable, an alternate hospital should be able to take on the workload. 

    Not everything here in this example is the responsibility of the hospital administrators! This is why the management and governance parts of the resilience ecosystem are so important in the bigger picture. 

    If we look at the financial sector, the EU DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act) specifically states that you must start with your business services. Like many others, the financial sector can no longer function without its digital landscape. If a bank is unexpectedly disconnected from its payment network, especially SWIFT, it will not be long before there are existential issues. A trading department stands to lose millions if the trading system fails. 

    Look in your own environment; you will see many such points. What if your internet connection goes down, and you rely on it for most of your business? How long can you afford to be out? How long before your clients notice and take action? Do you supply a small but critical service to an institution? Then, you may fall under the aforementioned laws (it's called third-party requirements, and your client may be liable to follow them.)

    But also, outside of the technology, we see points in the supply chain that require resilience. Do you still rely on a single person or provider for a critical function? Do you have backup procedures if the tech stops working, yet your clients require you to continue to service them? 

    In all these and other cases, you must know what your critical services are so that you can analyze the requirements and put the right measures in place.

    Once you have defined your critical business services and have analyzed their operational requirements, you can start to look at what you need to implement the aforementioned areas of availability, monitoring, hardening, and others. Remember we're still at the level of business service. The tech comes later and will require a deeper analysis. 

    In conclusion.

    Resilient operations ensure that you continue to function, at the right price, in the face of adverse events. If you can, resilience starts at the business level from the moment of product conception. If the products have long been developed, look at how they are delivered to the client and upgrade operations, resources, and tech where needed.

    In some cases, you are legally required to undertake this exercise. But in all cases, it is important that you understand your business services and the needs of your clients and put sufficient resources in the right places of your delivery chain. 

    If you want to discuss this further, please contact me for a free talk.

     

    Improve your core processes

    Improve your core processes


    We have over 45 fully detailed
    and interconnected process guides
    for you to improve your operations

    Managing and improving your processes is key to attaining commercial success

    Our practical guides help you to improve your operations

    We have hundreds of practical guides, grouped in many processes in our model. You may not need all of them. I suggest you browse within the belo top-level categories below and choose where to focus your attention. And with Tymans Group's help, you can go one process area at a time.

    If you want help deciding, please use the contact options below or click here.

    Check out our guides

    Our research and guides are priced from €299,00

    • Gert Taeymans Guidance

      Tymans Group Guidance & Consulting

      Tymans Group guidance and (online) consulting using both established and forward-looking research and field experience in our management domains.

      Contact

    • Tymans Group
      & Info-Tech
      Combo

      Get both inputs, all of the Info-tech research (with cashback rebate), and Tymans Group's guidance.

      Contact

    • Info-Tech Research

      Info-Tech offers a vast knowledge body, workshops, and guided implementations. You can buy Info-Tech memberships here at Tymans Group with cashback, reducing your actual outlay.

      Contact

    Register to read more …

    Establish an Effective Data Protection Plan

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}504|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $6,850 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 9 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Storage & Backup Optimization
    • Parent Category Link: /storage-and-backup-optimization
    • Business requirements can be vague. Not knowing the business needs often results in overspending and overexposure to liability through data hoarding.
    • Backup options are abundant. Disk, tape, or cloud? Each has drawbacks, efficiencies, and cost factors that should be considered.
    • Backup infrastructure is never greenfield. Any organization with a history has been doing backup. Existing software was likely determined by past choices and architecture.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Don’t let failure be your metric.
      The past is not an indication of future performance! Quantify the cost of your data being unavailable to demonstrate value to the business.
    • Stop offloading backup to your most junior staff.
      Data protection should not exist in isolation. Get key leadership involved to ensure you can meet organizational requirements.
    • A lot of data is useless. Neglecting to properly tag and classify data will lead to a costly data protection solution that protects redundant, useless, or outdated data

    Impact and Result

    • Determine the current state of your data protection strategy by identifying the pains and gains of the solution and create a business-facing diagram to present to relevant stakeholders.
    • Quantify the value of data to the business to properly understand the requirements for data protection through a business impact analysis.
    • Identify the attributes and necessary requirements for your data tiers to procure a fit-for-purpose solution.

    Establish an Effective Data Protection Plan Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read this Executive Brief to understand why the business should be involved in your data protection plan, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Define the current state of your data protection plan

    Define the current state of your data protection practices by documenting the backup process and identifying problems and opportunities for the desired state.

    • Establish an Effective Data Protection Plan – Phase 1: Define the Current State of Your Data Protection Plan
    • Data Protection Value Proposition Canvas Template

    2. Conduct a business impact analysis to understand requirements for restoring data

    Understand the business priorities.

    • Establish an Effective Data Protection Plan – Phase 2: Conduct a Business Impact Analysis to Understand Requirements for Restoring Data
    • DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool
    • Legacy DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool
    • Data Protection Recovery Workflow

    3. Propose the future state of your data protection plan

    Determine the desired state.

    • Establish an Effective Data Protection Plan – Phase 3: Propose the Future State of Your Data Protection Plan

    4. Establish proper governance for your data protection plan

    Explore the component of governance required.

    • Establish an Effective Data Protection Plan – Phase 4: Establish Proper Governance for Your Data Protection Plan
    • Data Protection Proposal Template
    [infographic]

    Improve IT Operations With AI and ML

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}454|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve.
    • member rating average days saved: Read what our members are saying
    • Parent Category Name: Operations Management
    • Parent Category Link: /i-and-o-process-management
    • Many IT departments experience difficulty with meeting the business' expectations for service delivery on a regular basis.
    • Despite significant investment in improving various areas of IT operations, you still feel like you’re constantly firefighting.
    • To tackle these issues, businesses tend to invest in purchasing multiple solutions. This not only complicates their IT operations, but also, in some cases, deteriorates functionality.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • To leverage AI capabilities, you first need to assess the current state of your IT operations and know what your priorities are.
    • Contemplate use cases that will get the most benefit from automation and start with processes that you are relatively comfortable handling.
    • Analyze your initial plan to identify easy wins, then expand your AIOps.

    Impact and Result

    • Perform a current state assessment to spot which areas within your operations management are the least mature and causing you the most grief. Identify which functional areas within operations management need to be prioritized for improvement.
    • Make a shortlist of use cases that will get the most benefit from AI-based technology.
    • Prepare a plan to deploy AI capabilities to improve your IT operations.

    Improve IT Operations With AI and ML Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out about the latest improvements in AIOps and how these can help you improve your IT operations. Review Info-Tech’s methodology and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Assess the current state of IT operations management

    Identify where your organization currently stands in its operations management practices.

    • AIOps Project Summary Template
    • AIOps Prerequisites Assessment Tool

    2. Identify initiatives that align with operations requirements

    Recognize the benefits of AI and ML for your business. Determine the necessary roles and responsibilities for potential initiatives, then develop and assess your shortlist.

    • AIOps RACI Template
    • AIOps Shortlisting Tool

    3. Develop the AI roadmap

    Analyze your ROI for AIOps and create an action plan. Communicate your AI and ML initiatives to stakeholders to obtain their support.

    • AIOps ROI Calculator
    • AIOps Roadmap Tool
    • AIOps Communications Plan Template
    [infographic]

    Automate Testing to Get More Done

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}285|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $29,139 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 5 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Testing, Deployment & QA
    • Parent Category Link: /testing-deployment-and-qa
    • Today’s rapidly changing software products and operational processes create mounting pressure on software delivery teams to release new features and changes quickly while meeting high and demanding quality standards.
    • Most organizations see automated testing as a solution to meet this demand alongside their continuous delivery pipeline. However, they often lack the critical foundations, skills, and practices that are imperative for success.
    • The technology is available to enable automated testing for many scenarios and systems, but industry noise and an expansive tooling marketplace create confusion for those interested in adopting this technology.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Good automated testing improves development throughput. No matter how quickly you put changes into production, end users will not accept them if they do not meet quality standards. Escaped defects, refactoring, and technical debt can significantly hinder your team’s ability to deliver software on time and on budget. In fact, 65% of organizations saw a reduction of test cycle time and 62% saw reductions in test costs with automated testing (Sogeti, World Quality Report 2020–21).
    • Start automation with unit and functional tests. Automated testing has a sharp learning curve, due to either the technical skills to implement and operate it or the test cases you are asked to automate. Unit tests and functional tests are ideal starting points in your automation journey because of the available tools and knowledge in the industry, the contained nature of the tests you are asked to execute, and the repeated use of the artifacts in more complicated tests (such as performance and integration tests). After all, you want to make sure the application works before stressing it.
    • Automated testing is a cross-functional practice, not a silo. A core component of successful software delivery throughput is recognizing and addressing defects, bugs, and other system issues early and throughout the software development lifecycle (SDLC). This involves having all software delivery roles collaborate on and participate in automated test case design, configure and orchestrate testing tools with other delivery tools, and proactively prepare the necessary test data and environments for test types.

    Impact and Result

    • Bring the right people to the table. Automated testing involves significant people, process and technology changes across multiple software delivery roles. These roles will help guide how automated testing will compliment and enhance their responsibilities.
    • Build a foundation. Review your current circumstances to understand the challenges blocking automated testing. Establish a strong base of good practices to support the gradually adoption of automated testing across all test types.
    • Start with one application. Verify and validate the automated testing practices used in one application and their fit for other applications and systems. Develop a reference guide to assist new teams.

    Automate Testing to Get More Done Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should automate testing, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    2. Adopt good automated testing practices

    Develop and implement practices that mature your automated testing capabilities.

    • Automated Testing Quick Reference Template

    Infographic

    Workshop: Automate Testing to Get More Done

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Adopt Good Automated Testing Practices

    The Purpose

    Understand the goals of and your vision for your automated testing practice.

    Develop your automated testing foundational practices.

    Adopt good practices for each test type.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Level set automated testing expectations and objectives.

    Learn the key practices needed to mature and streamline your automated testing across all test types.

    Activities

    1.1 Build a foundation.

    1.2 Automate your test types.

    Outputs

    Automated testing vision, expectations, and metrics

    Current state of your automated testing practice

    Ownership of the implementation and execution of automated testing foundations

    List of practices to introduce automation to for each test type

    IT Strategy

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}20|cart{/j2store}
    • Related Products: {j2store}20|crosssells{/j2store}
    • Up-Sell: {j2store}20|upsells{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.3/10
    • member rating average dollars saved: $105,465
    • member rating average days saved: 35
    • Parent Category Name: Strategy and Governance
    • Parent Category Link: strategy-and-governance
    Success depends on IT initiatives clearly aligned to business goals.

    Select Software With the Right Satisfaction Drivers in Mind

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}606|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Selection & Implementation
    • Parent Category Link: /selection-and-implementation
    • Software selection needs to provide satisfaction. Across the board, satisfaction is easy to achieve in the short term, but long-term satisfaction is much harder to attain. It’s not clear what leads to long-term satisfaction, and it’s even more difficult to determine which software continuously delivers on key satisfaction drivers to support the business.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Software satisfaction drops over time. After the initial purchase, the novelty factor of new software begins to wane, and only long-term satisfaction drivers sustain satisfaction after five years.
    • Surface-level satisfaction has immediate effects, but it only provides satisfaction in the short term. Deep satisfaction has a lasting impact that can shape organizational satisfaction and productivity in meaningful ways.
    • Empower IT decision makers with knowledge about what drives satisfaction in the top five and bottom five software vendors in spotlighted categories.

    Impact and Result

    • Reorient discussion around how software is implemented around satisfaction rather than what’s in fashion.
    • Identify software satisfaction drivers that provide deep satisfaction to get the most out of software over the long term.
    • Appreciate the best from the rest and learn which software categories and brands buck the trend of declining satisfaction.

    Select Software With the Right Satisfaction Drivers in Mind Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Understand what drives user satisfaction

    Gain insight on the various factors that influence software satisfaction.

    • Select Software With the Right Satisfaction Drivers in Mind Storyboard

    2. Learn what provides deep satisfaction

    Reduce the size of your RFPs or skip them entirely to limit time spent watching vendor dog and pony shows.

    3. Appreciate what separates the best from the rest

    Narrow the field to four contenders prior to in-depth comparison and engage in accelerated enterprise architecture oversight.

    [infographic]

    Build a Reporting and Analytics Strategy

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}128|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.1/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $49,748 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 28 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Business Intelligence Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /business-intelligence-strategy
    • In respect to business intelligence (BI) matureness, you can’t expect the whole organization to be at the same place at the same time. Your BI strategy needs to recognize this and should strive to align rather than dictate.
    • Technology is just one aspect of your BI and analytics strategy and is not a quick solution or a guarantee for long-term success.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • The BI strategy drives data warehouse and integration strategies and the data needed to support business decisions.
    • The solution to better BI often lies in improving the BI practice, not acquiring the latest and greatest tool.

    Impact and Result

    • Align BI with corporate vision, mission, goals, and strategic direction.
    • Understand the needs of business partners.
    • BI & analytics informs data warehouse and integration layers for required content, latency, and quality.

    Build a Reporting and Analytics Strategy Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should create or refresh the BI Strategy and review Info-Tech’s approach to developing a BI strategy that meets business needs.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Understand the business context and BI landscape

    Lay the foundation for the BI strategy by detailing key business information and analyzing current BI usage.

    • Build a Reporting and Analytics Strategy – Phase 1: Understand the Business Context and BI Landscape
    • BI Strategy and Roadmap Template
    • BI End-User Satisfaction Survey Framework

    2. Evaluate the current BI practice

    Assess the maturity level of the current BI practice and envision a future state.

    • Build a Reporting and Analytics Strategy – Phase 2: Evaluate the Current BI Practice
    • BI Practice Assessment Tool

    3. Create a BI roadmap for continuous improvement

    Create BI-focused initiatives to build an improvement roadmap.

    • Build a Reporting and Analytics Strategy – Phase 3: Create a BI Roadmap for Continuous Improvement
    • BI Initiatives and Roadmap Tool
    • BI Strategy and Roadmap Executive Presentation Template
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Build a Reporting and Analytics Strategy

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Establish Business Vision and Understand the Current BI Landscape

    The Purpose

    Document overall business vision, mission, and key objectives; assemble project team.

    Collect in-depth information around current BI usage and BI user perception.

    Create requirements gathering principles and gather requirements for a BI platform.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Increased IT–business alignment by using the business context as the project starting point

    Identified project sponsor and project team

    Detailed understanding of trends in BI usage and BI perception of consumers

    Refreshed requirements for a BI solution

    Activities

    1.1 Gather key business information (overall mission, goals, objectives, drivers).

    1.2 Establish a high-level ROI.

    1.3 Identify ideal candidates for carrying out a BI project.

    1.4 Undertake BI usage analyses, BI user perception survey, and a BI artifact inventory.

    1.5 Develop requirements gathering principles and approaches.

    1.6 Gather and organize BI requirements

    Outputs

    Articulated business context that will guide BI strategy development

    ROI for refreshing the BI strategy

    BI project team

    Comprehensive summary of current BI usage that has quantitative and qualitative perspectives

    BI requirements are confirmed

    2 Evaluate Current BI Maturity and Identify the BI Patterns for the Future State

    The Purpose

    Define current maturity level of BI practice.

    Envision the future state of your BI practice and identify desired BI patterns.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Know the correct migration method for Exchange Online.

    Prepare user profiles for the rest of the Office 365 implementation.

    Activities

    2.1 Perform BI SWOT analyses.

    2.2 Assess current state of the BI practice and review results.

    2.3 Create guiding principles for the future BI practice.

    2.4 Identify desired BI patterns and the associated BI functionalities/requirements.

    2.5 Define the future state of the BI practice.

    2.6 Establish the critical success factors for the future BI, identify potential risks, and create a mitigation plan.

    Outputs

    Exchange migration strategy

    Current state of BI practice is documented from multiple perspectives

    Guiding principles for future BI practice are established, along with the desired BI patterns linked to functional requirements

    Future BI practice is defined

    Critical success factors, potential risks, and a risk mitigation plan are defined

    3 Build Improvement Initiatives and Create a BI Development Roadmap

    The Purpose

    Build overall BI improvement initiatives and create a BI improvement roadmap.

    Identify supplementary initiatives for enhancing your BI program.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Defined roadmap composed of robust improvement initiatives

    Activities

    3.1 Create BI improvement initiatives based on outputs from phase 1 and 2 activities. Build an improvement roadmap.

    3.2 Build an improvement roadmap.

    3.3 Create an Excel governance policy.

    3.4 Create a plan for a BI ambassador network.

    Outputs

    Comprehensive BI initiatives placed on an improvement roadmap

    Excel governance policy is created

    Internal BI ambassadors are identified

    Further reading

    Build a Reporting and Analytics Strategy

    Deliver actionable business insights by creating a business-aligned reporting and analytics strategy.

    Terminology

    As the reporting and analytics space matured over the last decade, software suppliers used different terminology to differentiate their products from others’. This caused a great deal of confusion within the business communities.

    Following are two definitions of the term Business Intelligence:

    Business intelligence (BI) leverages software and services to transform data into actionable insights that inform an organization’s strategic and tactical business decisions. BI tools access and analyze data sets and present analytical findings in reports, summaries, dashboards, graphs, charts, and maps to provide users with detailed intelligence about the state of the business.

    The term business intelligence often also refers to a range of tools that provide quick, easy-to-digest access to insights about an organization's current state, based on available data.

    CIO Magazine

    Business intelligence (BI) comprises the strategies and technologies used by enterprises for the data analysis of business information. BI technologies provide historical, current, and predictive views of business operations.

    Common functions of business intelligence technologies include reporting, online analytical processing, analytics, data mining, process mining, complex event processing, business performance management, benchmarking, text mining, predictive analytics, and prescriptive analytics.

    Wikipedia

    This blueprint will use the terms “BI,” “BI and Analytics,” and “Reporting and Analytics” interchangeably in different contexts, but always in compliance to the above definitions.

    ANALYST PERSPECTIVE

    A fresh analytics & reporting strategy enables new BI opportunities.

    We need data to inform the business of past and current performance and to support strategic decisions. But we can also drown in a flood of data. Without a clear strategy for business intelligence, a promising new solution will produce only noise.

    BI and Analytics teams must provide the right quantitative and qualitative insights for the business to base their decisions on.

    Your Business Intelligence and Analytics strategy must support the organization’s strategy. Your strategy for BI & Analytics provides direction and requirements for data warehousing and data integration, and further paves the way for predictive analytics, big data analytics, market/industry intelligence, and social network analytics.

    Dirk Coetsee,

    Director, Data and Analytics Info-Tech Research Group

    Our understanding of the problem

    This Research is Designed For:

    • A CIO or Business Unit (BU) Leader looking to improve reporting and analytics, reduce time to information, and embrace fact-based decision making with analytics, reporting, and business intelligence (BI).
    • Application Directors experiencing poor results from an initial BI tool deployment who are looking to improve the outcome.

    This Research Will Also Assist:

    • Project Managers and Business Analysts assigned to a BI project team to collect and analyze requirements.
    • Business units that have their own BI platforms and would like to partner with IT to take their BI to an enterprise level.

    This Research Will Help You:

    • Align your reporting and analytics strategy with the business’ strategic objectives before you rebuild or buy your Business Intelligence platform.
    • Identify reporting and analytics objectives to inform the data warehouse and integration requirements gathering process.
    • Avoid common pitfalls that derail BI and analytic deployments and lower their adoption.
    • Identify Business Intelligence gaps prior to deployment and incorporate remedies within your plans.

    This Research Will Help Them:

    • Recruit the right resources for the program.
    • Align BI with corporate vision, mission, goals, and strategic direction.
    • Understand the needs of business partners.
    • Assess BI maturity and plan for target state.
    • Develop a BI strategy and roadmap.
    • Track the success of the BI initiative.

    Executive summary

    Situation:

    BI drives a new reality. Uber is the world’s largest taxi company and they own no vehicles; Alibaba is the world’s most valuable retailer and they have no inventory; Airbnb is the world’s largest accommodation provider and they own no real estate. How did they disrupt their markets and get past business entry barriers? A deep understanding of their market through impeccable business intelligence!

    Complication:

    • In respect to BI matureness, you can’t expect the whole organization to be at the same place at the same time. Your BI strategy needs to recognize this and should strive to align rather than dictate.
    • Technology is just one aspect of your BI and Analytics strategy and is not a quick solution or a guarantee for long term success.

    Resolution:

    • Drive strategy development by establishing the business context upfront in order to align business intelligence providers with the most important needs of their BI consumers and the strategic priorities of the organization.
    • Revamp or create a BI strategy to update your BI program to make it fit for purpose.
    • Understand your existing BI baggage – e.g. your existing BI program, the artifacts generated from the program, and the users it supports. Those will inform the creation of the strategy and roadmap.
    • Assess current BI maturity and determine your future state BI maturity.
    • BI needs governance to ensure consistent planning, communication, and execution of the BI strategy.
    • Create a network of BI ambassadors across the organization to promote BI.
    • Plan for the future to ensure that required data will be available when the organization needs it.

    Info-Tech Insight

    1. Put the “B” back in BI. Don’t have IT doing BI for IT’s sake; ensure the voice and needs of the business are the primary drivers of your strategy.
    2. The BI strategy drives data warehouse and integration strategies and the data needs to support business decisions.
    3. Go beyond the platform. The solution to better BI often lies in improving the BI practice, not acquiring the latest and greatest tool.

    Metrics to track BI & Analytical program progress

    Goals for BI:

    • Understand business context and needs. Identify business processes that can leverage BI.
    • Define the Reporting & Analytics Roadmap. Develop data initiatives, and create a strategy and roadmap for Business Intelligence.
    • Continuous improvements. Your BI program is evolving and improving over time. The program should allow you to have faster, better, and more comprehensive information.

    Info-Tech’s Suggested Metrics for Tracking the BI Program

    Practice Improvement Metrics Data Collection and Calculation Expected Improvement
    Program Level Metrics Efficiency
    • Time to information
    • Self-service penetration
    • Derive from the ticket management system
    • Derive from the BI platform
    • 10% reduction in time to information
    • Achieve 10-15% self-service penetration
    • Effectiveness
    • BI Usage
    • Data quality
    • Derive from the BI platform
    • Data quality perception
    • Majority of the users use BI on a daily basis
    • 15% increase in data quality perception
    Comprehensiveness
    • # of integrated datasets
    • # of strategic decisions made
    • Derive from the data integration platform
    • Decision-making perception
    • Onboard 2-3 new data domains per year
    • 20% increase in decision-making perception

    Intangible Metrics:

    Tap into the results of Info-Tech’s CIO Business Vision diagnostic to monitor the changes in business-user satisfaction as you implement the initiatives in your BI improvement roadmap.

    Your Enterprise BI and Analytics Strategy is driven by your organization’s Vision and Corporate Strategy

    Formulating an Enterprise Reporting and Analytics Strategy requires the business vision and strategies to first be substantiated. Any optimization to the Data Warehouse, Integration and Source layer is in turn driven by the Enterprise Reporting and Analytics Strategy

    Flow chart showing 'Business Vision Strategies'

    The current state of your Integration and Warehouse platforms determine what data can be utilized for BI and Analytics

    Where we are, and how we got here

    How we got here

    • In the beginning was BI 1.0. Business intelligence began as an IT-driven centralized solution that was highly governed. Business users were typically the consumers of reports and dashboards created by IT, an analytics-trained minority, upon request.
    • In the last five to ten years, we have seen a fundamental shift in the business intelligence and analytics market, moving away from such large-scale, centralized IT-driven solutions focused on basic reporting and administration, towards more advanced user-friendly data discovery and visualization platforms. This has come to be known as BI 2.0.
    • Many incumbent market leaders were disrupted by the demand for more user-friendly business intelligence solutions, allowing “pure-play” BI software vendors to carve out a niche and rapidly expand into more enterprise environments.
    • BI-on-the-cloud has established itself as a solid alternative to in-house implementation and operation.

    Where we are now

    • BI 3.0 has arrived. This involves the democratization of data and analytics and a predominantly app-centric approach to BI, identifiable by an anywhere, anytime, and device-or-platform-independent collaborative methodology. Social workgroups and self-guided content creation, delivery, analysis, and management is prominent.
    • Where the need for reporting and dashboards remains, we’re seeing data discovery platforms fulfilling the needs of non-technical business users by providing easy-to-use interactive solutions to increase adoption across enterprises.
    • With more end users demanding access to data and the tools to extract business insights, IT is looking to meet these needs while continuing to maintain governance and administration over a much larger base of users. The race for governed data discovery is heated and will be a market differentiator.
    • The next kid on the block is Artificial Intelligence that put further demands on data quality and availability.

    RICOH Canada used this methodology to develop their BI strategy in consultation with their business stakeholders

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Manufacturing and Retail

    Source: RICOH

    Ricoh Canada transforms the way people work with breakthrough technologies that help businesses innovate and grow. Its focus has always been to envision what the future will look like so that it can help its customers prepare for success. Ricoh empowers digital workplaces with a broad portfolio of services, solutions, and technologies – helping customers remove obstacles to sustained growth by optimizing the flow of information and automating antiquated processes to increase workplace productivity. In their commitment towards a customer-centric approach, Ricoh Canada recognized that BI and analytics can be used to inform business leaders in making strategic decisions.

    Enterprise BI and analytics Initiative

    Ricoh Canada enrolled in the ITRG Reporting & Analytics strategy workshop with the aim to create a BI strategy that will allow the business to harvest it strengths and build for the future. The workshop acted as a forum for the different business units to communicate, share ideas, and hear from each other what their pains are and what should be done to provide a full customer 360 view.

    Results

    “This workshop allowed us to collectively identify the various stakeholders and their unique requirements. This is a key factor in the development of an effective BI Analytics tool.” David Farrar

    The Customer 360 Initiative included the following components

    The Customer 360 Initiative includes the components shown in the image

    Improve BI Adoption Rates

    Graph showing Product Adoption Rates

    Sisense

    Reasons for low BI adoption

    • Employees that never used BI tools are slow to adopt new technology.
    • Lack of trust in data leads to lack of trust in the insights.
    • Complex data structures deter usage due to long learning curves and contained nuances.
    • Difficult to translate business requirements into tool linguistics due to lack of training or technical ineptness.
    • Business has not taken ownership of data, which affects access to data.

    How to foster BI adoption

    • Senior management proclaim data as a strategic asset and involved in the promotion of BI
    • Role Requirement that any business decision should be backed up by analytics
    • Communication of internal BI use case studies and successes
    • Exceptional data lineage to act as proof for the numbers
    • A Business Data glossary with clearly defined business terms. Use the Business Data Glossary in conjunction with data lineage and semantic layers to ensure that businesses are clearly defined and traced to sources.
    • Training in business to take ownership of data from inception to analytics.

    Why bother with analytics?

    In today’s ever-changing and global environment, organizations of every size need to effectively leverage their data assets to facilitate three key business drivers: customer intimacy, product/service innovation, and operational excellence. Plus, they need to manage their operational risk efficiently.

    Investing in a comprehensive business intelligence strategy allows for a multidimensional view of your organization’s data assets that can be operationalized to create a competitive edge:

    Historical Data

    Without a BI strategy, creating meaningful reports for business users that highlight trends in past performance and draw relationships between different data sources becomes a more complex task. Also, the ever growing need to identify and assess risks in new ways is driving many companies to BI.

    Data Democracy

    The core purpose of BI is to provide the right data, to the right users, at the right time, and in a format that is easily consumable and actionable. In developing a BI strategy, remember the driver for managed cross-functional access to data assets and features such as interactive dashboards, mobile BI, and self-service BI.

    Predictive and Big Data Analytics

    As the volume, variety, and velocity of data increases rapidly, businesses will need a strategy to outline how they plan to consume the new data in a manner that does not overwhelm their current capabilities and aligns with their desired future state. This same strategy further provides a foundation upon which organizations can transition from ad hoc reporting to using data assets in a codified BI platform for decision support.

    Business intelligence serves as the layer that translates data, information, and organizational knowledge into insights

    As executive decision making shifts to more fact-based, data-driven thinking, there is an urgent need for data assets to be organized and presented in a manner that enables immediate action.

    Typically, business decisions are based on a mix of intuition, opinion, emotion, organizational culture, and data. Though business users may be aware of its potential value in driving operational change, data is often viewed as inaccessible.

    Business intelligence bridges the gap between an organization’s data assets and consumable information that facilitates insight generation and informed decision making.

    Most organizations realize that they need a BI strategy; it’s no longer a nice-to-have, it’s a must-have.

    – Albert Hui, Principal, Data Economist

    A triangle grapg depicting the layers of business itelligence

    Business intelligence and business analytics: what is the difference and should you care

    Ask 100 people and you will get 100 answers. We like the prevailing view that BI looks at today and backward for improving who we are, while BA is forward-looking to support change decisions.

    The image depicts a chart flowing from Time Past to Future. Business Intelligence joins with Business Analytics over the Present
    • Business intelligence is concerned with looking at present and historical data.
    • Use this data to create reports/dashboards to inform a wide variety of information consumers of the past and current state of affairs.
    • Almost all organizations, regardless of size and maturity, use some level of BI even if it’s just very basic reporting.
    • Business analytics, on the other hand, is a forward-facing use of data, concerned with the present to the future.
    • Analytics uses data to both describe the present, and more importantly, predict the future, enabling strategic business decisions.
    • Although adoption is rapidly increasing, many organizations still do not utilize any advanced analytics in their environment.

    However, establishing a strong business intelligence program is a necessary precursor to an organization’s development of its business analytics capabilities.

    Organizations that successfully grow their BI capabilities are reaping the rewards

    Evidence is piling up: if planned well, BI contributes to the organization’s bottom line.

    It’s expected that there will be nearly 45 billion connected devices and a 42% increase in data volume each year posing a high business opportunity for the BI market (BERoE, 2020).

    The global business intelligence market size to grow from US$23.1 billion in 2020 to US$33.3 billion by 2025, at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.6% (Global News Wire, 2020)

    In the coming years, 69% of companies plan on increasing their cloud business intelligence usage (BARC Research and Eckerson Group Study, 2017).

    Call to Action

    Small organizations of up to 100 employees had the highest rate of business intelligence penetration last year (Forbes, 2018).

    Graph depicting business value from 0 months to more than 24 months

    Source: IBM Business Value, 2015

    For the New England Patriots, establishing a greater level of customer intimacy was driven by a tactical analytics initiative

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Professional Sports

    Source Target Marketing

    Problem

    Despite continued success as a franchise with a loyal fan base, the New England Patriots experienced one of their lowest season ticket renewal rates in over a decade for the 2009 season. Given the numerous email addresses that potential and current season-ticket holders used to engage with the organization, it was difficult for Kraft Sports Group to define how to effectively reach customers.

    Turning to a Tactical Analytics Approach

    Kraft Sports Group turned to the customer data that it had been collecting since 2007 and chose to leverage analytics in order to glean insight into season ticket holder behavior. By monitoring and reporting on customer activity online and in attendance at games, Kraft Sports Group was able to establish that customer engagement improved when communication from the organization was specifically tailored to customer preferences and historical behavior.

    Results

    By operationalizing their data assets with the help of analytics, the Patriots were able to achieve a record 97% renewal rate for the 2010 season. KSG was able to take their customer engagement to the next level and proactively look for signs of attrition in season-ticket renewals.

    We're very analytically focused and I consider us to be the voice of the customer within the organization… Ultimately, we should know when renewal might not happen and be able to market and communicate to change that behavior.

    – Jessica Gelman,

    VP Customer Marketing and Strategy, Kraft Sports Group

    A large percentage of all BI projects fail to meet the organization’s needs; avoid falling victim to common pitfalls

    Tool Usage Pitfalls

    • Business units are overwhelmed with the amount and type of data presented.
    • Poor data quality erodes trust, resulting in a decline in usage.
    • Analysis performed for the sake of analysis and doesn’t focus on obtaining relevant business-driven insights.

    Selection Pitfalls

    • Inadequate requirements gathering.
    • No business involvement in the selection process.
    • User experience is not considered.
    • Focus is on license fees and not total cost.

    Implementation Pitfalls

    • Absence of upfront planning
    • Lack of change management to facilitate adoption of the new platform
    • No quick wins that establish the value of the project early on
    • Inadequate initial or ongoing training

    Strategic Pitfalls

    • Poor alignment of BI goals with organization goals
    • Absence of CSFs/KPIs that can measure the qualitative and quantitative success of the project
    • No executive support during or after the project

    BI pitfalls are lurking around every corner, but a comprehensive strategy drafted upfront can help your organization overcome these obstacles. Info-Tech’s approach to BI has involvement from the business units built right into the process from the start and it equips IT to interact with key stakeholders early and often.

    Only 62% of Big Data and AI projects in 2019 provided measurable results.

    Source: NewVantage Partners LLC

    Business and IT have different priorities for a BI tool

    Business executives look for:

    • Ease of use
    • Speed and agility
    • Clear and concise information
    • Sustainability

    IT professionals are concerned about:

    • Solid security
    • Access controls on data
    • Compliance with regulations
    • Ease of integration

    Info-Tech Insight

    Combining these priorities will lead to better tool selection and more synergy.

    Elizabeth Mazenko

    The top-down BI Opportunity Analysis is a tool for senior executives to discover where Business Intelligence can provide value

    The image is of a top-down BI Opportunity Analysis.

    Example: Uncover BI opportunities with an opportunity analysis

    Industry Drivers Private label Rising input prices Retail consolidation
    Company strategies Win at supply chain execution Win at customer service Expand gross margins
    Value disciplines Strategic cost management Operational excellence Customer service
    Core processes Purchasing Inbound logistics Sales, service & distribution
    Enterprise management: Planning, budgeting, control, process improvement, HR
    BI Opportunities Customer service analysis Cost and financial analysis Demand management

    Williams (2016)

    Bridge the gap between business drivers and business intelligence features with a three-tiered framework

    Info-Tech’s approach to formulating a fit-for-purpose BI strategy is focused on making the link between factors that are the most important to the business users and the ways that BI providers can enable those consumers.

    Drivers to Establish Competitive Advantage

    • Operational Excellence
    • Client Intimacy
    • Innovation

    BI and Analytics Spectrum

    • Strategic Analytics
    • Tactical Analytics
    • Operational Analytics

    Info-Tech’s BI Patterns

    • Delivery
    • User Experience
    • Deep Analytics
    • Supporting

    This is the content for Layout H3 Tag

    Though business intelligence is primarily thought of as enabling executives, a comprehensive BI strategy involves a spectrum of analytics that can provide data-driven insight to all levels of an organization.

    Recommended

    Strategic Analytics

    • Typically focused on predictive modeling
    • Leverages data integrated from multiple sources (structured through unstructured)
    • Assists in identifying trends that may shift organizational focus and direction
    • Sample objectives:
      • Drive market share growth
      • Identify new markets, products, services, locations, and acquisitions
      • Build wider and deeper customer relationships earning more wallet share and keeping more customers

    Tactical Analytics

    • Often considered Response Analytics and used to react to situations that arise, or opportunities at a department level.
    • Sample objectives:
      • Staff productivity or cost analysis
      • Heuristics/algorithms for better risk management
      • Product bundling and packaging
      • Customer satisfaction response techniques

    Operational Analytics

    • Analytics that drive business process improvement whether internal, with external partners, or customers.
    • Sample objectives:
      • Process step elimination
      • Best opportunities for automation

    Business Intelligence Terminology

    Styles of BI New age BI New age data Functional Analytics Tools
    Reporting Agile BI Social Media data Performance management analytics Scorecarding dashboarding
    Ad hoc query SaaS BI Unstructured data Financial analytics Query & reporting
    Parameterized queries Pervasive BI Mobile data Supply chain analytics Statistics & data mining
    OLAP Cognitive Business Big data Customer analytics OLAP cubes
    Advanced analytics Self service analytics Sensor data Operations analytics ETL
    Cognitive business techniques Real-time Analytics Machine data HR Analytics Master data management
    Scorecards & dashboards Mobile Reporting & Analytics “fill in the blanks” analytics Data Governance

    Williams (2016)

    "BI can be confusing and overwhelming…"

    – Dirk Coetsee,

    Research Director,

    Info-Tech Research Group

    Business intelligence lies in the Information Dimensions layer of Info-Tech’s Data Management Framework

    The interactions between the information dimensions and overlying data management enablers such as data governance, data architecture, and data quality underscore the importance of building a robust process surrounding the other data practices in order to fully leverage your BI platform.

    Within this framework BI and analytics are grouped as one lens through which data assets at the business information level can be viewed.

    The image is the Information Dimensions layer of Info-Tech’s Data Management Framework

    Use Info-Tech’s three-phase approach to a Reporting & Analytics strategy and roadmap development

    Project Insight

    A BI program is not a static project that is created once and remains unchanged. Your strategy must be treated as a living platform to be revisited and revitalized in order to effectively enable business decision making. Develop a reporting and analytics strategy that propels your organization by building it on business goals and objectives, as well as comprehensive assessments that quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate your current reporting and analytical capabilities.

    Phase 1: Understand the Business Context and BI Landscape Phase 2: Evaluate Your Current BI Practice Phase 3: Create a BI Roadmap for Continuous Improvement
    1.1 Establish the Business Context
    • Business Vision, Goals, Key Drivers
    • Business Case Presentation
    • High-Level ROI
    2.1 Assess Your Current BI Maturity
    • BI Practice Assessment
    • Summary of Current State
    3.1 Construct a BI Initiative Roadmap
    • BI Improvement Initiatives
    • RACI
    • BI Strategy and Roadmap
    1.2 Assess Existing BI Environment
    • BI Perception Survey Framework
    • Usage Analyses
    • BI Report Inventory
    2.2 Envision BI Future State
    • BI Style Requirements
    • BI Practice Assessment
    3.2 Plan for Continuous Improvement
    • Excel/Access Governance Policy
    • BI Ambassador Network Draft
    1.3 Develop BI Solution Requirements
    • Requirements Gathering Principles
    • Overall BI Requirements

    Stand on the shoulders of Information Management giants

    As part of our research process, we leveraged the frameworks of COBIT5, Mike 2.0, and DAMA DMBOK2. Contextualizing business intelligence within these frameworks clarifies its importance and role and ensures that our assessment tool is focused on key priority areas.

    The DMBOK2 Data Management framework by the Data Asset Management Association (DAMA) provided a starting point for our classification of the components in our IM framework.

    Mike 2.0 is a data management framework that helped guide the development of our framework through its core solutions and composite solutions.

    The Cobit 5 framework and its business enablers were used as a starting point for assessing the performance capabilities of the different components of information management, including business intelligence.

    Info-Tech has a series of deliverables to facilitate the evolution of your BI strategy

    BI Strategy Roadmap Template

    BI Practice Assessment Tool

    BI Initiatives and Roadmap Tool

    BI Strategy and Roadmap Executive Presentation Template

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit Guided Implementation Workshop Consulting
    “Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.” “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.” “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.” “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Build a Reporting and Analytics Strategy – Project Overview

    1. Understand the Business Context and BI Landscape 2. Evaluate the Current BI Practice 3. Create a BI Roadmap for Continuous Improvement
    Best-Practice Toolkit

    1.1 Document overall business vision, mission, industry drivers, and key objectives; assemble a project team

    1.2 Collect in-depth information around current BI usage and BI user perception

    1.3 Create requirements gathering principles and gather requirements for a BI platform

    2.1 Define current maturity level of BI practice

    2.2 Envision the future state of your BI practice and identify desired BI patterns

    3.1 Build overall BI improvement initiatives and create a BI improvement roadmap

    3.2 Identify supplementary initiatives for enhancing your BI program

    Guided Implementations
    • Discuss Info-Tech’s approach for using business information to drive BI strategy formation
    • Review business context and discuss approaches for conducting BI usage and user analyses
    • Discuss strategies for BI requirements gathering
    • Discuss BI maturity model
    • Review practice capability gaps and discuss potential BI patterns for future state
    • Discuss initiative building
    • Review completed roadmap and next steps
    Onsite Workshop Module 1:

    Establish Business Vision and Understand the Current BI Landscape

    Module 2:

    Evaluate Current BI Maturity Identify the BI Patterns for the Future State

    Module 3:

    Build Improvement Initiatives and Create a BI Development Roadmap

    Phase 1 Outcome:
    • Business context
    • Project team
    • BI usage information, user perception, and new BI requirements
    Phase 2 Outcome:
    • Current and future state assessment
    • Identified BI patterns
    Phase 3 Outcome:
    • BI improvement strategy and initiative roadmap

    Workshop overview

    Contact your account representative or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Workshop Day 1 Workshop Day 2 Workshop Day 3 Workshop Day 4
    Activities

    Understand Business Context and Structure the Project

    1.1 Make the case for a BI strategy refresh.

    1.2 Understand business context.

    1.3 Determine high-level ROI.

    1.4 Structure the BI strategy refresh project.

    Understand Existing BI and Revisit Requirements

    2.1 Understand the usage of your existing BI.

    2.2 Gather perception of the current BI users.

    2.3 Document existing information artifacts.

    2.4 Develop a requirements gathering framework.

    2.5 Gather requirements.

    Revisit Requirements and Current Practice Assessment

    3.1 Gather requirements.

    3.2 Determine BI Maturity Level.

    3.3 Perform a SWOT for your existing BI program.

    3.4 Develop a current state summary.

    Roadmap Develop and Plan for Continuous Improvements

    5.1 Develop BI strategy.

    5.2 Develop a roadmap for the strategy.

    5.3 Plan for continuous improvement opportunities.

    5.4 Develop a re-strategy plan.

    Deliverables
    1. Business and BI Vision, Goals, Key Drivers
    2. Business Case Presentation
    3. High-Level ROI
    4. Project RACI
    1. BI Perception Survey
    2. BI Requirements Gathering Framework
    3. BI User Stories and Requirements
    1. BI User Stories and Requirements
    2. BI SWOT for your Current BI Program
    3. BI Maturity Level
    4. Current State Summary
    1. BI Strategy
    2. Roadmap accompanying the strategy with timeline
    3. A plan for improving BI
    4. Strategy plan

    Phase 2

    Understand the Business Context and BI Landscape

    Build a Reporting and Analytics Strategy

    Phase 1 overview

    Detailed Overview

    Step 1: Establish the business context in terms of business vision, mission, objectives, industry drivers, and business processes that can leverage Business Intelligence

    Step 2: Understand your BI Landscape

    Step 3: Understand business needs

    Outcomes

    • Clearly articulated high-level mission, vision, and key drivers from the business, as well as objectives related to business intelligence.
    • In-depth documentation regarding your organization’s BI usage, user perception, and outputs.
    • Consolidated list of requirements, existing and desired, that will direct the deployment of your BI solution.

    Benefits

    • Align business context and drivers with IT plans for BI and Analytics improvement.
    • Understand your current BI ecosystem’s performance.

    Understand your business context and BI landscape

    Phase 1 Overarching Insight

    The closer you align your new BI platform to real business interests, the stronger the buy-in, realized value, and groundswell of enthusiastic adoption will be. Get this phase right to realize a high ROI on your investment in the people, processes, and technology that will be your next generation BI platform.

    Understand the Business Context to Rationalize Your BI Landscape Evaluate Your Current BI Practice Create a BI Roadmap for Continuous Improvement
    Establish the Business Context
    • Business Vision, Goals, Key Drivers
    • Business Case Presentation
    • High-Level ROI
    Assess Your Current BI Maturity
    • SWOT Analysis
    • BI Practice Assessment
    • Summary of Current State
    Construct a BI Initiative Roadmap
    • BI Improvement Initiatives
    • BI Strategy and Roadmap
    Access Existing BI Environment
    • BI Perception Survey Framework
    • Usage Analyses
    • BI Report Inventory
    Envision BI Future State
    • BI Patterns
    • BI Practice Assessment
    • List of Functions
    Plan for Continuous Improvement
    • Excel Governance Policy
    • BI Ambassador Network Draft
    Undergo Requirements Gathering
    • Requirements Gathering Principles
    • Overall BI Requirements

    Track these metrics to measure your progress through Phase 1

    Goals for Phase 1:

    • Understand the business context. Determine if BI can be used to improve business outcomes by identifying benefits, costs, opportunities, and gaps.
    • Understand your existing BI. Plan your next generation BI based on a solid understanding of your existing BI.
    • Identify business needs. Determine the business processes that can leverage BI and Analytics.

    Info-Tech’s Suggested Metrics for Tracking Phase 1 Goals

    Practice Improvement Metrics Data Collection and Calculation Expected Improvement
    Monetary ROI
    • Quality of the ROI
    • # of user cases, benefits, and costs quantified
    Derive the number of the use cases, benefits, and costs in the scoping. Ask business SMEs to verify the quality. High-quality ROI studies are created for at least three use cases
    Response Rate of the BI Perception Survey Sourced from your survey delivery system Aim for 40% response rate
    # of BI Reworks Sourced from your project management system Reduction of 10% in BI reworks

    Intangible Metrics:

    1. Executives’ understanding of the BI program and what BI can do for the organization.
    2. Improved trust between IT and the business by re-opening the dialogue.
    3. Closer alignment with the organization strategy and business plan leading to higher value delivered.
    4. Increased business engagement and input into the Analytics strategy.

    Use advisory support to accelerate your completion of Phase 1 activities

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of two to three advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 1: Understand the Business Context and BI Landscape

    Proposed Time to Completion: 2-4 weeks

    Step 1.0: Assemble Your Project Team

    Start with an analyst kick-off call:

    • Discuss Info-Tech’s viewpoint and definitions of business intelligence.
    • Discuss the project sponsorship, ideal team members and compositions.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Identify a project sponsor and the project team members.

    Step 1.1: Understand Your Business Context

    Start with an analyst kick-off call:

    • Discuss Info-Tech’s approach to BI strategy development around using business information as the key driver.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Detail the business context (vision, mission, goals, objectives, etc.).
    • Establish business–IT alignment for your BI strategy by detailing the business context.

    Step 1.2: Establish the Current BI Landscape

    Review findings with analyst:

    • Review the business context outputs from Step 1.1 activities.
    • Review Info-Tech’s approach for documenting your current BI landscape.
    • Review the findings of your BI landscape.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Gather information on current BI usage and perform a BI artifact inventory.
    • Construct and conduct a user perception survey.

    With these tools & templates:

    BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Step 1.0

    Assemble the Project Team

    Select a BI project sponsor

    Info-Tech recommends you select a senior executive with close ties to BI be the sponsor for this project (e.g. CDO, CFO or CMO). To maximize the chance of success, Info-Tech recommends you start with the CDO, CMO, CFO, or a business unit (BU) leader who represents strategic enterprise portfolios.

    Initial Sponsor

    CFO or Chief Risk Officer (CRO)

    • The CFO is responsible for key business metrics and cost control. BI is on the CFO’s radar as it can be used for both cost optimization and elimination of low-value activity costs.
    • The CRO is tasked with the need to identify, address, and when possible, exploit risk for business security and benefit.
    • Both of these roles are good initial sponsors but aren’t ideal for the long term.

    CDO or a Business Unit (BU) Leader

    • The CDO (Chief Data Officer) is responsible for enterprise-wide governance and utilization of information as an asset via data processing, analysis, data mining, information trading, and other means, and is the ideal sponsor.
    • BU leaders who represent a growth engine for a company look for ways to mine BI to help set direction.

    Ultimate Sponsor

    CEO

    • As a the primary driver of enterprise-wide strategy, the CEO is the ideal evangelist and project sponsor for your BI strategy.
    • Establishing a CEO–CIO partnership helps elevate IT to the level of a strategic partner, as opposed to the traditional view that IT’s only job is to “keep the lights on.”
    • An endorsement from the CEO may make other C-level executives more inclined to work with IT and have their business unit be the starting point for growing a BI program organically.

    "In the energy sector, achieving production KPIs are the key to financial success. The CFO is motivated to work with IT to create BI applications that drive higher revenue, identify operational bottlenecks, and maintain gross margin."

    – Yogi Schulz, Partner, Corvelle Consulting

    Select a BI project team

    Create a project team with the right skills, experience, and perspectives to develop a comprehensive strategy aligned to business needs.

    You may need to involve external experts as well as individuals within the organization who have the needed skills.

    A detailed understanding of what to look for in potential candidates is essential before moving forward with your BI project.

    Leverage several of Info-Tech’s Job Description Templates to aid in the process of selecting the right people to involve in constructing your BI strategy.

    Roles to Consider

    Business Stakeholders

    Business Intelligence Specialist

    Business Analyst

    Data Mining Specialist

    Data Warehouse Architect

    Enterprise Data Architect

    Data Steward

    "In developing the ideal BI team, your key person to have is a strong data architect, but you also need buy-in from the highest levels of the organization. Buy-in from different levels of the organization are indicators of success more than anything else."

    – Rob Anderson, Database Administrator and BI Manager, IT Research and Advisory Firm

    Create a RACI matrix to clearly define the roles and responsibilities for the parties involved

    A common project management pitfall for any endeavour is unclear definition of responsibilities amongst the individuals involved.

    As a business intelligence project requires a significant amount of back and forth between business and IT – bridged by the BI Steering Committee – clear guidelines at the project outset with a RACI chart provide a basic framework for assigning tasks and lines of communication for the later stages.

    Responsible Accountable Consulted Informed

    Obtaining Buy-in Project Charter Requirements Design Development Program Creation
    BI Steering Committee A C I I I C
    Project Sponsor - C I I I C
    Project Manager - R A I I C
    VP of BI R I I I I A
    CIO A I I I I R
    Business Analyst I I R C C C
    Solution Architect - - C A C C
    Data Architect - - C A C C
    BI Developer - - C C R C
    Data Steward - - C R C C
    Business SME C C C C C C

    Note: This RACI is an example of how role expectations would be broken down across the different steps of the project. Develop your own RACI based on project scope and participants.

    STEP 1.1

    Understand Your Business Context and Structure the Project

    Establish business–IT alignment for your BI strategy by detailing the business context

    Step Objectives

    • Engage the business units to find out where users need BI enablement.
    • Ideate preliminary points for improvement that will further business goals and calculate their value.

    Step Activities

    1.1.1 Craft the vision and mission statements for the Analytics program using the vision, mission, and strategies of your organization as basis.

    1.1.2 Articulate program goals and objectives

    1.1.3 Determine business differentiators and key drivers

    1.1.4 Brainstorm BI-specific constraints and improvement objectives

    Outcomes

    • Clearly articulated business context that will provide a starting point for formulating a BI strategy
    • High-level improvement objectives and ROI for the overall project
    • Vision, mission, and objectives of the analytics program

    Research Support

    • Info-Tech’s BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Proposed Participants in this Step

    • Project Manager
    • Project Team
    • Relevant Business Stakeholders and Subject Matter Experts

    Transform the way the business makes decisions

    Your BI strategy should enable the business to make fast, effective, and comprehensive decisions.

    Fast Effective Comprehensive
    Reduce time spent on decision-making by designing a BI strategy around information needs of key decision makers. Make the right data available to key decision makers. Make strategic high-value, impactful decisions as well as operational decisions.

    "We can improve BI environments in several ways. First, we can improve the speed with which we create BI objects by insisting that the environments are designed with flexibility and adaptability in mind. Second, we can produce higher quality deliverables by ensuring that IT collaborate with the business on every deliverable. Finally, we can reduce the costs of BI by giving access to the environment to knowledgeable business users and encouraging a self-service function."

    – Claudia Imhoff, Founder, Boulder BI Brain Trust, Intelligent Solutions Inc.

    Assess needs of various stakeholders using personas

    User groups/user personas

    Different users have different consumption and usage patterns. Categorize users into user groups and visualize the usage patterns. The user groups are the connection between the BI capabilities and the users.

    User groups Mindset Usage Pattern Requirements
    Front-line workers Get my job done; perform my job quickly. Reports (standard reports, prompted reports, etc.) Examples:
    • Report bursting
    • Prompted reports
    Analysts I have some ideas; I need data to validate and support my ideas. Dashboards, self-service BI, forecasting/budgeting, collaboration Examples:
    • Self-service datasets
    • Data mashup capability
    Management I need a big-picture view and yet I need to play around with the data to find trends to drive my business. Dashboards, scorecards, mobile BI, forecasting/budgeting Examples:
    • Multi-tab dashboards
    • Scorecard capability
    Data scientists I need to combine existing data, as well as external or new, unexplored data sources and types to find nuggets in the data. Data mashup, connections to data sources Examples:
    • Connectivity to big data
    • Social media analyses

    The pains of inadequate BI are felt across the entire organization – and land squarely on the shoulders of the CIO

    Organization:

    • Insufficient information to make decisions.
    • Unable to measure internal performance.
    • Losses incurred from bad decisions or delayed decisions.
    • Canned reports fail to uncover key insights.
    • Multiple versions of information exist in silos.

    IT Department

    • End users are completely dependent on IT for reports.
    • Ad hoc BI requests take time away from core duties.
    • Spreadsheet-driven BI is overly manual.
    • Business losing trust in IT.

    CIO

    • Under great pressure and has a strong desire to improve BI.
    • Ad hoc BI requests are consuming IT resources and funds.
    • My organization finds value in using data and having decision support to make informed decisions.

    The overarching question that needs to be continually asked to create an effective BI strategy is:

    How do I create an environment that makes information accessible and consumable to users, and facilitates a collaborative dialogue between the business and IT?

    Pre-requisites for success

    Prerequisite #1: Secure Executive Sponsorship

    Sponsorship of BI that is outside of IT and at the highest levels of the organization is essential to the success of your BI strategy. Without it, there is a high chance that your BI program will fail. Note that it may not be an epic fail, but it is a subtle drying out in many cases.

    Prerequisite #2: Understand Business Context

    Providing the right tools for business decision making doesn’t need to be a guessing game if the business context is laid as the project foundation and the most pressing decisions serve as starting points. And business is engaged in formulating and executing the strategy.

    Prerequisite #3: Deliver insights that lead to action

    Start with understanding the business processes and where analytics can improve outcomes. “Think business backwards, not data forward.” (McKinsey)

    11 reasons BI projects fail

    Lack of Executive support

    Old Technology

    Lack of business support

    Too many KPIs

    No methodology for gathering requirements

    Overly long project timeframes

    Bad user experience

    Lack of user adoption

    Bad data

    Lack of proper human resources

    No upfront definition of true ROI

    Mico Yuk, 2019

    Make it clear to the business that IT is committed to building and supporting a BI platform that is intimately tied to enabling changing business objectives.

    Leverage Info-Tech’s BI Strategy and Roadmap Template to accelerate BI planning

    How to accelerate BI planning using the template

    1. Prepopulated text that you can use for your strategy formulation:
    2. Prepopulated text that can be used for your strategy formulation
    3. Sample bullet points that you can pick and choose from:
    4. Sample bullet points to pick and choose from

    Document the BI program planning in Info-Tech’s

    BI Strategy and Roadmap Template.

    Activity: Describe your organization’s vision and mission

    1.1.1

    30-40 minutes

    Compelling vision and mission statements will help guide your internal members toward your company’s target state. These will drive your business intelligence strategy.

    1. Your vision clearly represents where your organization aspires to be in the future and aligns the entire organization. Write down a future-looking, inspirational, and realizable vision in one concise statement. Consider:
    • “Five years from now, our business will be _______.”
    • What do we want to do tomorrow? For whom? What is the benefit?
  • Your mission tells why your organization currently exists and clearly expresses how it will achieve your vision for the future. Write down a mission statement in one clear and concise paragraph consisting of, at most, five sentences. Consider:
    • Why does the business exist? What problems does it solve? Who are its customers?
    • How does the business accomplish strategic tasks or reach its target?
  • Reconvene stakeholders to share ideas and develop one concise vision statement and mission statement. Focus on clarity and message over wording.
  • Input

    • Business vision and mission statements

    Output

    • Alignment and understanding on business vision

    Materials

    Participants

    • BI project lead
    • Executive business stakeholders

    Info-Tech Insight

    Adjust your statements until you feel that you can elicit a firm understanding of both your vision and mission in three minutes or less.

    Formulating an Enterprise BI and Analytics Strategy: Top-down BI Opportunity analysis

    Top-down BI Opportunity analysis

    Example of deriving BI opportunities using BI Opportunity Analysis

    Industry Drivers Private label Rising input prices Retail consolidation
    Company strategies Win at supply chain execution Win at customer service Expand gross margins
    Value disciplines Strategic cost management Operational excellence Customer service
    Core processes Purchasing Inbound logistics Sales, service & distribution
    Enterprise management: Planning, budgeting, control, process improvement, HR
    BI Opportunities Customer service analysis Cost and financial analysis Demand management

    Williams 2016

    Get your organization buzzing about BI – leverage Info-Tech’s Executive Brief as an internal marketing tool

    Two key tasks of a project sponsor are to:

    1. Evangelize the realizable benefits of investing in a business intelligence strategy.
    2. Help to shift the corporate culture to one that places emphasis on data-driven insight.

    Arm your project sponsor with our Executive Brief for this blueprint as a quick way to convey the value of this project to potential stakeholders.

    Bolster this presentation by adding use cases and metrics that are most relevant to your organization.

    Develop a business framework

    Identifying organizational goals and how data can support those goals is key to creating a successful BI & Analytical strategy. Rounding out the business model with technology drivers, environmental factors (as described in previous steps), and internal barriers and enablers creates a holistic view of Business Intelligence within the context of the organization as a whole.

    Through business engagement and contribution, the following holistic model can be created to understand the needs of the business.

    business framework holistic model

    Activity: Describe the Industry Drivers and Organization strategy to mitigate the risk

    1.1.2

    30-45 minutes

    Industry drivers are external influencers that has an effect on a business such as economic conditions, competitor actions, trade relations, climate etc. These drivers can differ significantly by industry and even organizations within the same industry.

    1. List the industry drivers that influences your organization:
    • Public sentiment in regards to energy source
    • Rising cost of raw materials due to increase demand
  • List the company strategies, goals, objectives to counteract the external influencers:
    • Change production process to become more energy efficient
    • Win at customer service
  • Identify the value disciplines :
    • Strategic cost management
    • Operational Excellence
  • List the core process that implements the value disciplines :
    • Purchasing
    • Sales
  • Identify the BI Opportunities:
    • Cost and financial analysis
    • Customer service analysis

    Input

    • Industry drivers

    Output

    • BI Opportunities that business can leverage

    Materials

    • Industry driver section in the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Participants

    • BI project lead
    • Executive business stakeholders

    Understand BI and analytics drivers and organizational objectives

    Environmental Factors Organizational Goals Business Needs Technology Drivers
    Definition External considerations are factors taking place outside the organization that are impacting the way business is conducted inside the organization. These are often outside the control of the business. Organizational drivers can be thought of as business-level metrics. These are tangible benefits the business can measure, such as customer retention, operation excellence, and/or financial performance. A requirement that specifies the behavior and the functions of a system. Technology drivers are technological changes that have created the need for a new BI solution. Many organizations turn to technology systems to help them obtain a competitive edge.
    Examples
    • Economy and politics
    • Laws and regulations
    • Competitive influencers
    • Time to market
    • Quality
    • Delivery reliability
    • Audit tracking
    • Authorization levels
    • Business rules
    • Deployment in the cloud
    • Integration
    • Reporting capabilities

    Activity: Discuss BI/Analytics drivers and organizational objectives

    1.1.3

    30-45 minutes

    1. Use the industry drivers and business goals identified in activity 1.1.2 as a starting point.
    2. Understand how the company runs today and what the organization’s future will look like. Try to identify the purpose for becoming an integrated organization. Use a whiteboard and markers to capture key findings.
    3. Take into account External Considerations, Organizational Drivers, Technology Drivers, and Key Functional Requirements.
    External Considerations Organizational Drivers Technology Considerations Functional Requirements
    • Funding Constraints
    • Regulations
    • Compliance
    • Scalability
    • Operational Efficiency
    • Data Accuracy
    • Data Quality
    • Better Reporting
    • Information Availability
    • Integration Between Systems
    • Secure Data

    Identify challenges and barriers to the BI project

    There are several factors that may stifle the success of a BI implementation. Scan the current environment to identify internal barriers and challenges to identify potential challenges so you can meet them head-on.

    Common Internal Barriers

    Management Support
    Organizational Culture
    Organizational Structure
    IT Readiness
    Definition The degree of management understanding and acceptance towards BI solutions. The collective shared values and beliefs. The functional relationships between people and departments in an organization. The degree to which the organization’s people and processes are prepared for a new BI solution.
    Questions
    • Is a BI project recognized as a top priority?
    • Will management commit time to the project?
    • Are employees resistant to change?
    • Is the organization highly individualized?
    • Is the organization centralized?
    • Is the organization highly formalized?
    • Is there strong technical expertise?
    • Is there strong infrastructure?
    Impact
    • Funding
    • Resources
    • Knowledge sharing
    • User acceptance
    • Flow of knowledge
    • Poor implementation
    • Reliance on consultants

    Activity: Discuss BI/Analytics challenges and pain points

    1.1.4

    30-45 minutes

    1. Identify challenges with the process identified in step 1.1.2.
    2. Brainstorm potential barriers to successful BI implementation and adoption. Use a whiteboard and marker to capture key findings.
    3. Consider Functional Gaps, Technical Gaps, Process Gaps, and Barriers to BI Success.
    Functional Gaps Technical Gaps Process Gaps Barriers to Success
    • No online purchase order requisition
    • Inconsistent reporting – data quality concerns
    • Duplication of data
    • Lack of system integration
    • Cultural mindset
    • Resistance to change
    • Lack of training
    • Funding

    Activity: Discuss opportunities and benefits

    1.1.5

    30-45 minutes

    1. Identify opportunities and benefits from an integrated system.
    2. Brainstorm potential enablers for successful BI implementation and adoption. Use a whiteboard and markers to capture key findings.
    3. Consider Business Benefits, IT Benefits, Organizational Benefits, and Enablers of BI success.
    Business Benefits IT Benefits Organizational Benefits Enablers of Success
    • Business-IT alignment
    • Compliance
    • Scalability
    • Operational Efficiency
    • Data Accuracy
    • Data Quality
    • Better Reporting
    • Change management
    • Training
    • Alignment to strategic objectives

    Your organization’s framework for Business Intelligence Strategy

    Blank organization framework for Business Intelligence Strategy

    Example: Business Framework for Data & Analytics Strategy

    The following diagram represents [Client]’s business model for BI and data. This holistic view of [Client]’s current environment serves as the basis for the generation of the business-aligned Data & Analytics Strategy.

    The image is an example of Business Framework for Data & Analytics Strategy.

    Info-Tech recommends balancing a top-down approach with bottom up for building your BI strateg

    Taking a top-down approach will ensure senior management’s involvement and support throughout the project. This ensures that the most critical decisions are supported by the right data/information, aligning the entire organization with the BI strategy. Furthermore, the gains from BI will be much more significant and visible to the rest of the organization.

    Two charts showing the top-down and bottom-up approach.

    Far too often, organizations taking a bottom-up approach to BI will fail to generate sufficient buy-in and awareness from senior management. Not only does a lack of senior involvement result in lower adoption from the tactical and operational levels, but more importantly, it also means that the strategic decision makers aren’t taking advantage of BI.

    Estimate the ROI of your BI and analytics strategy to secure executive support

    The value of creating a new strategy – or revamping an existing one – needs to be conveyed effectively to a high-level stakeholder, ideally a C-level executive. That executive buy-in is more likely to be acquired when effort has been made to determine the return on investment for the overall initiative.

    1. Business Impacts
      New revenue
      Cost savings
      Time to market
      Internal Benefits
      Productivity gain
      Process optimization
      Investment
      People – employees’ time, external resources
      Data – cost for new datasets
      Technology – cost for new technologies
    2. QuantifyCan you put a number or a percentage to the impacts and benefits? QuantifyCan you estimate the investments you need to put in?
    3. TranslateTranslate the quantities into dollar value
    4. The image depicts an equation for ROI estimate

    Example

    One percent increase in revenue; three more employees $225,000/yr, $150,000/yr 50%

    Activity: Establish a high-level ROI as part of an overall use case for developing a fit-for-purpose BI strategy

    1.1.6

    1.5 hours

    Communicating an ROI that is impactful and reasonable is essential for locking in executive-level support for any initiative. Use this activity as an initial touchpoint to bring business and IT perspectives as part of building a robust business case for developing your BI strategy.

    1. Revisit the business context detailed in the previous sections of this phase. Use priority objectives to identify use case(s), ideally where there are easily defined revenue generators/cost reductions (e.g. streamlining the process of mailing physical marketing materials to customers).
    2. Assign research tasks around establishing concrete numbers and dollar values.
    • Have a subject matter expert weigh in to validate your figures.
    • When calculating ROI, consider how you might leverage BI to create opportunities for upsell, cross-sell, or increased customer retention.
  • Reconvene the stakeholder group and discuss your findings.
    • This is the point where expectation management is important. Separate the need-to-haves from the nice-to-haves.

    Emphasize that ROI is not fully realized after the first implementation, but comes as the platform is built upon iteratively and in an integrated fashion to mature capabilities over time.

    Input

    • Vision statement
    • Mission statement

    Output

    • Business differentiators and key drivers

    Materials

    • Benefit Cost Analysis section of the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Participants

    • BI project lead
    • Executive IT & business stakeholders

    An effective BI strategy positions business intelligence in the larger data lifecycle

    In an effort to keep users satisfied, many organizations rush into implementing a BI platform and generating reports for their business users. BI is, first and foremost, a presentation layer; there are several stages in the data lifecycle where the data that BI visualizes can be compromised.

    Without paying the appropriate amount of attention to the underlying data architecture and application integration, even the most sophisticated BI platforms will fall short of providing business users with a holistic view of company information.

    Example

    In moving away from single application-level reporting, a strategy around data integration practices and technology is necessary before the resultant data can be passed to the BI platform for additional analyses and visualization.

    BI doesn’t exist in a vacuum – develop an awareness of other key data management practices

    As business intelligence is primarily a presentation layer that allows business users to visualize data and turn information into actionable decisions, there are a number of data management practices that precede BI in the flow of data.

    Data Warehousing

    The data warehouse structures source data in a manner that is more operationally focused. The Reporting & Analytics Strategy must inform the warehouse strategy on data needs and building a data warehouse to meet those needs.

    Data Integration, MDM & RDM

    The data warehouse is built from different sources that must be integrated and normalized to enable Business Intelligence. The Info-Tech integration and MDM blueprints will guide with their implementation.

    Data Quality

    A major roadblock to building an effective BI solution is a lack of accurate, timely, consistent, and relevant data. Use Info-Tech’s blueprint to refine your approach to data quality management.

    Data quality, poor integration/P2P integration, poor data architecture are the primary barriers to truly leveraging BI, and a lot of companies haven’t gotten better in these areas.

    – Shari Lava, Associate Vice-President, IT Research and Advisory Firm

    Building consensus around data definitions across business units is a critical step in carrying out a BI strategy

    Business intelligence is heavily reliant on the ability of an organization to mesh data from different sources together and create a holistic and accurate source of truth for users.

    Useful analytics cannot be conducted if your business units define key business terms differently.

    Example

    Finance may label customers as those who have transactional records with the organization, but Marketing includes leads who have not yet had any transactions as customers. Neglecting to note these seemingly small discrepancies in data definition will undermine efforts to combine data assets from traditionally siloed functional units.

    In the stages prior to implementing any kind of BI platform, a top priority should be establishing common definitions for key business terms (customers, products, accounts, prospects, contacts, product groups, etc.).

    As a preliminary step, document different definitions for the same business terms so that business users are aware of these differences before attempting to combine data to create custom reports.

    Self-Assessment

    Do you have common definitions of business terms?

    • If not, identify common business terms.
    • At the very least, document different definitions of the same business terms so the corporate can compare and contrast them.

    STEP 1.2

    Assess the Current BI Landscape

    Establish an in-depth understanding of your current BI landscape

    Step Objectives

    • Inventory and assess the state of your current BI landscape
    • Document the artifacts of your BI environment

    Step Activities

    1.2.1 Analyze the usage levels of your current BI programs/platform

    1.2.2 Perform a survey to gather user perception of your current BI environment

    1.2.3 Take an inventory of your current BI artifacts

    Outcomes

    • Summarize the qualitative and quantitative performance of your existing BI environment
    • Understand the outputs coming from your BI sources

    Research Support

    • Info-Tech’s BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Project Manager

    Data Architect(s) or Enterprise Architect

    Project Team

    Understand your current BI landscape before you rationalize

    Relying too heavily on technology as the sole way to solve BI problems results in a more complex environment that will ultimately frustrate business users. Take the time to thoroughly assess the current state of your business intelligence landscape using a qualitative (user perception) and quantitative (usage statistics) approach. The insights and gaps identified in this step will serve as building blocks for strategy and roadmap development in later phases.

    Phase 1

    Current State Summary of BI Landscape

    1.2.1 1.2.2 1.2.3 1.2.4
    Usage Insights Perception Insights BI Inventory Insights Requirements Insights

    PHASE 2

    Strategy and Roadmap Formulation

    Gather usage insights to pinpoint the hot spots for BI usage amongst your users

    Usage data reflects the consumption patterns of end users. By reviewing usage data, you can identify aspects of your BI program that are popular and those that are underutilized. It may present some opportunities for trimming some of the underutilized content.

    Benefits of analyzing usage data:

    • Usage is a proxy for popularity and usability of the BI artifacts. The popular content should be kept and improved in your next generation BI.
    • Usage information provides insight on what, when, where, and how much users are consuming BI artifacts.
    • Unlike methods such as user interviews and focus groups, usage information is fact based and is not subject to peer pressure or “toning down.”

    Sample Sources of Usage Data:

    1. Usage reports from your BI platform Many BI platforms have out-of-the-box usage reports that log and summarize usage data. This is your ideal source for usage data.
    2. Administrator console in your BI platformBI platforms usually have an administrator console that allows BI administrators to configure settings and to monitor activities that include usage. You may obtain some usage data in the console. Note that the usage data is usually real-time in nature, and you may not have access to a historical view of the BI usage.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Don’t forget some of the power users. They may perform analytics by accessing datasets directly or with the help of a query tool (even straight SQL statements). Their usage information is important. The next generation BI should provide consumption options for them.

    Accelerate the process of gathering user feedback with Info-Tech’s Application Portfolio Assessment (APA)

    In an environment where multiple BI tools are being used, discovering what works for users and what doesn’t is an important first step to rationalizing the BI landscape.

    Info-Tech’s Application Portfolio Assessment allows you to create a custom survey based on your current applications, generate a custom report that will help you visualize user satisfaction levels, and pinpoint areas for improvement.

    Activity: Review and analyze usage data

    1.2.1

    2 hours

    This activity helps you to locate usage data in your existing environment. It also helps you to review and analyze usage data to come up with a few findings.

    1. Get to the usage source. You may obtain usage data from one of the below options. Usage reports are your ideal choice, followed by some alternative options:
    2. a. Administrator console – limited to real-time or daily usage data. You may need to track usage data over for several days to identify patterns.

      b. Info-Tech’s Application Portfolio Assessment (APA).

      c. Other – be creative. Some may use an IT usage monitoring system or web analytics to track time users spent on the BI portal.

    3. Develop categories for classifying the different sources of usage data in your current BI environment. Use the following table as starting point for creating these groups:

    This is the content for Layout H4 Tag

    By Frequency Real Time Daily Weekly Yearly
    By Presentation Format Report Dashboard Alert Scorecard
    By Delivery Web portal Excel PDF Mobile application

    INPUT

    • Usage reports
    • Usage statistics

    OUTPUT

    • Insights pertaining to usage patterns

    Materials

    • Usage Insights of the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Participants

    • BA
    • BI Administrator
    • PM

    Activity: Review and analyze usage (cont.)

    1.2.1

    2 hours

    3. Sort your collection of BI artifacts by usage. Discuss some of the reasons why some content is popular whereas some has no usage at all.

    Popular BI Artifacts – Discuss improvements, opportunities and new artifacts

    Unpopular BI Artifacts – Discuss retirement, improvements, and realigning information needs

    4. Summarize your findings in the Usage Insights section of the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template.

    INPUT

    • Usage reports
    • Usage statistics

    OUTPUT

    • Insights pertaining to usage patterns

    Materials

    • Usage Insights section of the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Participants

    • BA
    • BI Administrator
    • PM

    Gather perception to understand the existing BI users

    In 1.2.1, we gathered the statistics for BI usage; it’s the hard data telling who uses what. However, it does not tell you the rationale, or the why, behind the usage. Gathering user perception and having conversations with your BI consumers is the key to bridging the gap.

    User Perception Survey

    Helps you to:

    1. Get general insights on user perception
    2. Narrow down to selected areas

    User Interviews

    Perception can be gathered by user interviews and surveys. Conducting user interviews takes time so it is a good practice to get some primary insights via survey before doing in-depth interviews in selected areas.

    – Shari Lava, Associate Vice-President, IT Research and Advisory Firm

    Define problem statements to create proof-of-concept initiatives

    Info-Tech’s Four Column Model of Data Flow

    Find a data-related problem or opportunity

    Ask open-ended discovery questions about stakeholder fears, hopes, and frustrations to identify a data-related problem that is clear, contained, and fixable. This is then to be written as a problem/opportunity statement.

    1. Fear: What is the number one risk you need to alleviate?
    2. Hope: What is the number one opportunity you wish to realize?
    3. Frustration: What is the number one annoying pet peeve you wish to scratch?
    4. Next, gather information to support a problem/opportunity statement:

    5. What are your challenges in performing the activity or process today?
    6. What does amazing look like if we solve this perfectly?
    7. What other business activities/processes will be impacted/improved if we solve this?
    8. What compliance/regulatory/policy concerns do we need to consider in any solution?
    9. What measures of success/change should we use to prove value of the effort (KPIs/ROI)?
    10. What are the steps in the process/activity?
    11. What are the applications/systems used at each step and from step to step?
    12. What data elements are created, used, and/or transformed at each step?

    Leverage Info-Tech’s BI survey framework to initiate a 360° perception survey

    Info-Tech has developed a BI survey framework to help existing BI practices gather user perception via survey. The framework is built upon best practices developed by McLean & Company.

    1. Communicate the survey
    2. Create a survey
    3. Conduct the survey
    4. Collect and clean survey data
    5. Analyze survey data
    6. Conduct follow-up interviews
    7. Identify and prioritize improvement initiatives

    The survey takes a comprehensive approach by examining your existing BI practices through the following lenses:

    360° Perception

    Demographics Who are the users? From which department?
    Usage How is the current BI being used?
    People Web portal
    Process How good is your BI team from a user perspective?
    Data How good is the BI data in terms of quality and usability?
    Technology How good are your existing BI/reporting tools?
    Textual Feedback The sky’s the limit. Tell us your comments and ideas via open-ended questions.

    Use Info-Tech’s BI End-User Satisfaction Survey Framework to develop a comprehensive BI survey tailored to your organization.

    Activity: Develop a plan to gather user perception of your current BI program

    1.2.2

    2 hours

    This activity helps you to plan for a BI perception survey and subsequent interviews.

    1. Proper communication while conducting surveys helps to boost response rate. The project team should have a meeting with business executives to decide:
    • The survey goals
    • Which areas to cover
    • Which trends and hypotheses you want to confirm
    • Which pre-, during, and post-survey communications should be sent out
  • Have the project team create the first draft of the survey for subsequent review by select business stakeholders. Several iterations may be needed before finalizing.
  • In planning for the conclusion of the survey, the project team should engage a data analyst to:
    1. Organize the data in a useful format
    2. Clean up the survey data when there are gaps
    3. Summarize the data into a presentable/distributable format

    Collectively, the project team and the BI consuming departments should review the presentation and discuss these items:

    Misalignment

    Opportunities

    Inefficiencies

    Trends

    Need detailed interviews?

    INPUT

    • Usage information and analyses

    OUTPUT

    • User-perception survey

    Materials

    • Perception Insights section of the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Participants

    • BA
    • BI Administrator
    • PM
    • Business SMEs

    Create a comprehensive inventory of your BI artifacts

    Taking an inventory of your BI artifacts allows you to understand what deliverables have been developed over the years. Inventory taking should go beyond the BI content. You may want to include additional information products such as Excel spreadsheets, reports that are coming out of an Access database, and reports that are generated from front-end applications (e.g. Salesforce).

    1. Existing Reports from BI platform

    2. If you are currently using a BI platform, you have some BI artifacts (reports, scorecards, dashboards) that are developed within the platform itself.

    • BI Usage Reports (refer to step 2.1) – if you are getting a comprehensive BI usage reports for all your BI artifacts, there is your inventory report too.
    • BI Inventory Reports – Your BI platform may provide out-of-the-box inventory reports. You can use them as your inventory.
    • If the above options are not feasible, you may need to manually create the BI inventory. You may build that from some of your existing BI documentations to save time.
  • Excel and Access

    • Work with the business units to identify if Excel and Access are used to generate reports.
  • Application Reports

    • Data applications such as Salesforce, CRM, and ERP often provide reports as an out-of-the-box feature.
    • Those reports only include data within their respective applications. However, this may present opportunities for integrating application data with additional data sources.

    Activity: Inventory your BI artifacts

    1.2.3

    2+ hours

    This activity helps you to inventory your BI information artifacts and other related information artifacts.

    1. Define the scope of your inventory. Work with the project sponsor and CIO to define which sources should be captured in the inventory process. Consider: BI inventory, Excel spreadsheets, Access reports, and application reporting.
    2. Define the depth of your inventory. Work with the project sponsor and CIO to define the level of granularity. In some settings, the artifact name and a short description may be sufficient. In other cases, you may need to document users and business logic of the artifacts.
    3. Review the inventory results. Discuss findings and opportunities around the following areas:

    Interpret your Inventory

    Duplicated reports/ dashboards Similar reports/ dashboards that may be able to merge Excel and Access reports that are using undocumented, unconventional business logics Application reports that need to be enhanced by additional data Classify artifacts by BI Type

    INPUT

    • Current BI artifacts and documents
    • BI Type classification

    OUTPUT

    • Summary of BI artifacts

    Materials

    • BI Inventory Insights section of the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Participants

    • BA
    • Data analyst
    • PM
    • Project sponsor

    Project sponsor

    1.2.4

    2+ hours

    This activity helps you to inventory your BI by report type.

    1. Classify BI artifacts by type. Use the BI Type tool to classify Work with the project sponsor and CIO to define which sources should be captured in the inventory process. Consider: BI inventory, Excel spreadsheets, Access reports, and application reporting.
    2. Define the depth of your inventory. Work with the project sponsor and CIO to define the level of granularity. In some settings, the artifact name and a short description may be sufficient. In other cases, you may need to document users and business logic of the artifacts.
    3. Review the inventory results. Discuss findings and opportunities around the following areas:

    Interpretation of your Inventory

    Duplicated reports/dashboards Similar reports/dashboards that may be able to merge Excel and Access reports that are using undocumented, unconventional business logics Application reports that need to be enhanced by additional data

    INPUT

    • The BI Type as used by different business units
    • Business BI requirements

    OUTPUT

    • Summary of BI type usage across the organization

    Materials

    • BI Inventory Insights section of the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Participants

    • BA
    • Data analyst
    • PM
    • Project sponsor

    STEP 1.3

    Undergo BI Requirements Gathering

    Perform requirements gathering for revamping your BI environment

    Step Objectives

    • Create principles that will direct effective requirements gathering
    • Create a list of existing and desired BI requirements

    Step Activities

    1.3.1 Create requirements gathering principles

    1.3.2 Gather appropriate requirements

    1.3.3 Organize and consolidate the outputs of requirements gathering activities

    Outcomes

    • Requirements gathering principles that are flexible and repeatable
    • List of BI requirements

    Research Support

    • Info-Tech’s BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Proposed Participants in this Step

    Project Manager

    Data Architect(s) or Enterprise Architect

    Project Team

    Business Users

    Don’t let your new BI platform become a victim of poor requirements gathering

    The challenges in requirements management often have underlying causes; find and eliminate the root causes rather than focusing on the symptoms.

    Root Causes of Poor Requirements Gathering:

    • Requirements gathering procedures exist but aren’t followed.
    • There isn't enough time allocated to the requirements gathering phase.
    • There isn't enough involvement or investment secured from business partners.
    • There is no senior leadership involvement or mandate to fix requirements gathering.
    • There are inadequate efforts put towards obtaining and enforcing sign off.

    Outcomes of Poor Requirements Gathering:

    • Rework due to poor requirements leads to costly overruns.
    • Final deliverables are of poor quality and are implemented late.
    • Predicted gains from deployed applications are not realized.
    • There are low feature utilization rates by end users.
    • Teams are frustrated within IT and the business.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Requirements gathering is the number one failure point for most development or procurement projects that don’t deliver value. This has been, and continues to be, the case as most organizations still don't get requirements gathering right. Overcoming organizational cynicism can be a major obstacle to clear when it is time to optimize the requirements gathering process.

    Define the attributes of a good requirement to help shape your requirements gathering principles

    A good requirement has the following attributes:

    Verifiable It is stated in a way that can be tested.
    Unambiguous It is free of subjective terms and can only be interpreted in one way.
    Complete It contains all relevant information.
    Consistent It does not conflict with other requirements.
    Achievable It is possible to accomplish given the budgetary and technological constraints.
    Traceable It can be tracked from inception to testing.
    Unitary It addresses only one thing and cannot be deconstructed into multiple requirements.
    Accurate It is based on proven facts and correct information.

    Other Considerations

    Organizations can also track a requirement owner, rationale, priority level (must have vs. nice to have), and current status (approved, tested, etc.).

    Info-Tech Insight

    Requirements must be solution agnostic – they should focus on the underlying need rather than the technology required to satisfy the need.

    Activity: Define requirements gathering principles

    1.3.1

    1 hour

    1. Invite representatives from the project management office, project management team, and BA team, as well as some key business stakeholders.
    2. Use the sample categories and principles in the table below as starting points for creating your own requirements gathering principles.
    3. Document the requirements gathering principles in the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template.
    4. Communicate the requirements gathering principles to the affected BI stakeholders.

    Sample Principles to Start With

    Effectiveness Face-to-face interviews are preferred over phone interviews.
    Alignment Clarify any misalignments, even the tiniest ones.
    Validation Rephrase requirements at the end to validate requirements.
    Ideation Use drawings and charts to explain ideas.
    Demonstration Make use of Joint Application Development (JAD) sessions.

    INPUT

    • Existing requirement principles (if any)

    OUTPUT

    • Requirements gathering principles that can be revisited and reused

    Materials

    • Requirements Insights section of the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Participants

    • BA Team
    • PM
    • Business stakeholders
    • PMO

    Info-Tech Insight

    Turn requirements gathering principles into house rules. The house rules should be available in every single requirements gathering session and the participants should revisit them when there are disagreements, confusion, or silence.

    Right-size your approach to BI requirements management

    Info-Tech suggests four requirements management approaches based on project complexity and business significance. BI projects usually require the Strategic Approach in requirements management.

    Requirements Management Process Explanations

    Approach Definition Recommended Strategy
    Strategic Approach High business significance and high project complexity merits a significant investment of time and resources in requirements gathering. Treat the requirements gathering phase as a project within a project. A large amount of time should be dedicated to elicitation, business process mapping, and solution design.
    Fundamental Approach High business significance and low project complexity merits a heavy emphasis on the elicitation phase to ensure that the project bases are covered and business value is realized. Look to achieve quick wins and try to survey a broad cross-section of stakeholders during elicitation and validation. The elicitation phase should be highly iterative. Do not over-complicate the analysis and validation of a straightforward project.
    Calculated Approach Low business significance and high project complexity merits a heavy emphasis on the analysis and validation phases to ensure that the solution meets the needs of users. Allocate a significant amount of time to business process modeling, requirements categorization, prioritization, and solution modeling.
    Elementary Approach Low business significance and low project complexity does not merit a high amount of rigor for requirements gathering. Do not rush or skip steps, but aim to be efficient. Focus on basic elicitation techniques (e.g. unstructured interviews, open-ended surveys) and consider capturing requirements as user stories. Focus on efficiency to prevent project delays and avoid squandering resources.

    Vary the modes used in eliciting requirements from your user base

    Requirements Gathering Modes

    Info-Tech has identified four effective requirements gathering modes. During the requirements gathering process, you may need to switch between the four gathering modes to establish a thorough understanding of the information needs.

    Dream Mode

    • Mentality: Let users’ imaginations go wild. The sky’s the limit.
    • How it works: Ask users to dream up the ideal future state and ask how analytics can support those dreams.
    • Limitations: Not all dreams can be fulfilled. A variety of constraints (budget, personnel, technical skills) may prevent the dreams from becoming reality.

    Pain Mode

    • Mentality: Users are currently experiencing pains related to information needs.
    • How it works: Vent the pains. Allow end users to share their information pains, ask them how their pains can be relieved, then convert those pains to requirements.
    • Limitations: Users are limited by the current situation and aren’t looking to innovate.

    Decode Mode

    • Mentality: Read the hidden messages from users. Speculate as to what the users really want.
    • How it works: Decode the underlying messages. Be innovative to develop hypotheses and then validate with the users.
    • Limitations: Speculations and hypothesis could be invalid. They may direct the users into some pre-determined directions.

    Profile Mode

    • Mentality: “I think you may want XYZ because you fall into that profile.”
    • How it works: The information user may fall into some existing user group profile or their information needs may be similar to some existing users.
    • Limitations: This mode doesn’t address very specific needs.

    Supplement BI requirements with user stories and prototyping to ensure BI is fit for purpose

    BI is a continually evolving program. BI artifacts that were developed in the past may not be relevant to the business anymore due to changes in the business and information usage. Revamping your BI program entails revisiting some of the BI requirements and/or gathering new BI requirements.

    Three-Step Process for Gathering Requirements

    Requirements User Stories Rapid Prototyping
    Gather requirements. Most importantly, understand the business needs and wants. Leverage user stories to organize and make sense of the requirements. Use a prototype to confirm requirements and show the initial draft to end users.

    Pain Mode: “I can’t access and manipulate data on my own...”

    Decode Mode: Dig deeper: could this hint at a self-service use case?

    Dream Mode: E.g. a sandbox area where I can play around with clean, integrated, well-represented data.

    Profile Mode: E.g. another marketing analyst is currently using something similar.

    ExampleMary has a spreadmart that keeps track of all campaigns. Maintaining and executing that spreadmart is time consuming.

    Mary is asking for a mash-up data set that she can pivot on her own…

    Upon reviewing the data and the prototype, Mary decided to use a heat map and included two more data points – tenure and lifetime value.

    Identify which BI styles best meet user requirements

    A spectrum of Business Intelligence solutions styles are available. Use Info-Tech’s BI Styles Tool to assess which business stakeholder will be best served by which style.

    Style Description Strategic Importance (1-5) Popularity (1-5) Effort (1-5)
    Standards Preformatted reports Standard, preformatted information for backward-looking analysis. 5 5 1
    User-defined analyses Pre-staged information where “pick lists” enable business users to filter (select) the information they wish to analyze, such as sales for a selected region during a selected previous timeframe. 5 4 2
    Ad-hoc analyses Power users write their own queries to extract self-selected pre-staged information and then use the information to perform a user-created analysis. 5 4 3
    Scorecards and dashboards Predefined business performance metrics about performance variables that are important to the organization, presented in a tabular or graphical format that enables business users to see at a glance how the organization is performing. 4 4 3
    Multidimensional analysis (OLAP) Multidimensional analysis (also known as on-line analytical processing): Flexible tool-based, user-defined analysis of business performance and the underlying drivers or root causes of that performance. 4 3 3
    Alerts Predefined analyses of key business performance variables, comparison to a performance standard or range, and communication to designated businesspeople when performance is outside the predefined performance standard or range. 4 3 3
    Advanced Analytics Application of long-established statistical and/or operations research methods to historical business information to look backward and characterize a relevant aspect of business performance, typically by using descriptive statistics. 5 3 4
    Predictive Analytics Application of long-established statistical and/or operations research methods and historical business information to predict, model, or simulate future business and/or economic performance and potentially prescribe a favored course of action for the future. 5 3 5

    Activity: Gather BI requirements

    1.3.2

    2-6 hours

    Using the approaches discussed on previous slides, start a dialogue with business users to confirm existing requirements and develop new ones.

    1. Invite business stakeholders to a requirements gathering session.
    2. For existing BI artifacts – Invite existing users of those artifacts.

      For new BI development – Invite stakeholders at the executive level to understand the business operation and their needs and wants. This is especially important if their department is new to BI.

    3. Discuss the business requirements. Systematically switch between the four requirements gathering modes to get a holistic view of the requirements.
    4. Once requirements are gathered, organize them to tell a story. A story usually has these components:
    The Setting The Characters The Venues The Activities The Future
    Example Customers are asking for a bundle discount. CMO and the marketing analysts want to… …the information should be available in the portal, mobile, and Excel. …information is then used in the bi-weekly pricing meeting to discuss… …bundle information should contain historical data in a graphical format to help executives.

    INPUT

    • Existing documentations on BI artifacts

    OUTPUT

    • Preliminary, uncategorized list of BI requirements

    Materials

    • Requirements Insights section of the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Participants

    • BA team
    • Business stakeholders
    • Business SMEs
    • BI developers

    Clarify consumer needs by categorizing BI requirements

    Requirements are too broad in some situations and too detailed in others. In the previous step we developed user stories to provide context. Now you need to define requirement categories and gather detailed requirements.

    Considerations for Requirement Categories

    Category Subcategory Sample Requirements
    Data Granularity Individual transaction
    Transformation Transform activation date to YYYY-MM format
    Selection Criteria Client type: consumer. Exclude SMB and business clients. US only. Recent three years
    Fields Required Consumer band, Region, Submarket…
    Functionality Filters Filters required on the dashboard: date range filter, region filter…
    Drill Down Path Drill down from a summary report to individual transactions
    Analysis Required Cross-tab, time series, pie chart
    Visual Requirements Mock-up See attached drawing
    Section The dashboard will be presented using three sections
    Conditional Formatting Below-average numbers are highlighted
    Security Mobile The dashboard needs to be accessed from mobile devices
    Role Regional managers will get a subset of the dashboard according to the region
    Users John, Mary, Tom, Bob, and Dave
    Export Dashboard data cannot be exported into PDF, text, or Excel formats
    Performance Speed A BI artifact must be loaded in three seconds
    Latency Two seconds response time when a filter is changed
    Capacity Be able to serve 50 concurrent users with the performance expected
    Control Governance Govern by the corporate BI standards
    Regulations Meet HIPPA requirements
    Compliance Meet ISO requirements

    Prioritize requirements to assist with solution modeling

    Prioritization ensures that the development team focuses on the right requirements.

    The MoSCoW Model of Prioritization

    Must Have Requirements that mustbe implemented for the solution to be considered successful.
    Should Have Requirements that are high priority and should be included in the solution if possible.
    Could Have Requirements that are desirable but not necessary and could be included if resources are available.
    Won't Have Requirements that won’t be in the next release but will be considered for the future releases.

    The MoSCoW model was introduced by Dai Clegg of Oracle UK in 1994.

    Prioritization is the process of ranking each requirement based on its importance to project success. Hold a separate meeting for the domain SMEs, implementation SMEs, project managers, and project sponsors to prioritize the requirements list. At the conclusion of the meeting, each requirement should be assigned a priority level. The implementation SMEs will use these priority levels to ensure that efforts are targeted towards the proper requirements and the plan features available on each release. Use the MoSCoW Model of Prioritization to effectively order requirements.

    Activity: Finalize the list of BI requirements

    1.3.3

    1-4 hours

    Requirement Category Framework

    Category Subcategory
    Data Granularity
    Transformation
    Selection Criteria
    Fields Required
    Functionality Filters
    Drill Down Path
    Analysis Required
    Visual Requirements Mock-up
    Section
    Conditional Formatting
    Security Mobile
    Role
    Users
    Export
    Performance Speed
    Latency
    Capacity
    Control Governance
    Regulations
    Compliance

    Create requirement buckets and classify requirements.

    1. Define requirement categories according to the framework.
    2. Review the user story and requirements you collected in Step 1.3.2. Classify the requirements within requirement categories.
    3. Review the preliminary list of categorized requirements and look for gaps in this detailed view. You may need to gather additional requirements to fill the gaps.
    4. Prioritize the requirements according to the MoSCoW framework.
    5. Document your final list of requirements in the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template.

    INPUT

    • Existing requirements and new requirements from step 1.3.2

    OUTPUT

    • Prioritized and categorized requirements

    Materials

    • Requirements Insights section of the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Participants

    • BA
    • Business stakeholders
    • PMO

    Translate your findings and ideas into actions that will be integrated into the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    As you progress through each phase, document findings and ideas as they arise. At phase end, hold a brainstorming session with the project team focused on documenting findings and ideas and substantiating them into improvement actions.

    Translating findings and ideas into actions that will be integrated into the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Ask yourself how BI or analytics can be used to address the gaps and explore opportunities uncovered in each phase. For example, in Phase 1, how do current BI capabilities impede the realization of the business vision?

    Document and prioritize Phase 1 findings, ideas, and action items

    1.3.4

    1-2 hours

    1. Reconvene as a group to review findings, ideas, and actions harvested in Phase 1. Write the findings, ideas, and actions on sticky notes.
    2. Prioritize the sticky notes to yield those with high business value and low implementation effort. View some sample findings below:
    3. High Business Value, Low Effort High Business Value, High Effort
      Low Business Value, High Effort Low Business Value, High Effort

      Phase 1

      Sample Phase 1 Findings Found two business objectives that are not supported by BI/analytics
      Some executives still think BI is reporting
      Some confusion around operational reporting and BI
      Data quality plays a big role in BI
      Many executives are not sure about the BI ROI or asking for one
    4. Select the top findings and document them in the “Other Phase 1 Findings” section of the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template. The findings will be used again in Phase 3.

    INPUT

    • Phase 1 activities
    • Business context (vision, mission, goals, etc.

    OUTPUT

    • Other Phase 1 Findings section of the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • Project manger
    • Project team
    • Business stakeholders

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    1.1.1-1.1.5

    Establish the business context

    To begin the workshop, your project team will be taken through a series of activities to establish the overall business vision, mission, objectives, goals, and key drivers. This information will serve as the foundation for discerning how the revamped BI strategy needs to enable business users.

    1.2.1- 1.2.3

    Create a comprehensive documentation of your current BI environment

    Our analysts will take your project team through a series of activities that will facilitate an assessment of current BI usage and artifacts, and help you design an end-user interview survey to elicit context around BI usage patterns.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-tech analysts

    1.3.1-1.3.3

    Establish new BI requirements

    Our analysts will guide your project team through frameworks for eliciting and organizing requirements from business users, and then use those frameworks in exercises to gather some actual requirements from business stakeholders.

    Phase 2

    Evaluate Your Current BI Practice

    Build a Reporting and Analytics Strategy

    Revisit project metrics to track phase progress

    Goals for Phase 2:

    • Assess your current BI practice. Determine the maturity of your current BI practice from different viewpoints.
    • Develop your BI target state. Plan your next generation BI with Info-Tech’s BI patterns and best practices.
    • Safeguard your target state. Avoid BI pitfalls by proactively monitoring BI risks.

    Info-Tech’s Suggested Metrics for Tracking Phase 2 Goals

    Practice Improvement Metrics Data Collection and Calculation Expected Improvement
    # of groups participated in the current state assessment The number of groups joined the current assessment using Info-Tech’s BI Practice Assessment Tool Varies; the tool can accommodate up to five groups
    # of risks mitigated Derive from your risk register At least two to five risks will be identified and mitigated

    Intangible Metrics:

    • Prototyping approach allows the BI group to understand more about business requirements, and in the meantime, allows the business to understand how to partner with the BI group.
    • The BI group and the business have more confidence in the BI program as risks are monitored and mitigated on an ad hoc basis.

    Evaluate your current BI practice

    Phase 2 Overarching Insight

    BI success is not based solely on the technology it runs on; technology cannot mask gaps in capabilities. You must be capable in your environment, and data management, data quality, and related data practices must be strong. Otherwise, the usefulness of the intelligence suffers. The best BI solution does not only provide a technology platform, but also addresses the elements that surround the platform. Look beyond tools and holistically assess the maturity of your BI practice with input from both the BI consumer and provider perspectives.

    Understand the Business Context to Rationalize Your BI Landscape Evaluate Your Current BI Practice Create a BI Roadmap for Continuous Improvement
    Establish the Business Context
    • Business Vision, Goals, Key Drivers
    • Business Case Presentation
    • High-Level ROI
    Assess Your Current BI Maturity
    • SWOT Analysis
    • BI Practice Assessment
    • Summary of Current State
    Construct a BI Initiative Roadmap
    • BI Improvement Initiatives
    • BI Strategy and Roadmap
    Access Existing BI Environment
    • BI Perception Survey Framework
    • Usage Analyses
    • BI Report Inventory
    Envision BI Future State
    • BI Patterns
    • BI Practice Assessment
    • List of Functions
    Plan for Continuous Improvement
    • Excel Governance Policy
    • BI Ambassador Network Draft
    Undergo Requirements Gathering
    • Requirements Gathering Principles
    • Overall BI Requirements

    Phase 2 overview

    Detailed Overview

    Step 1: Assess Your Current BI Practice

    Step 2: Envision a Future State for Your BI Practice

    Outcomes

    • A comprehensive assessment of current BI practice maturity and capabilities.
    • Articulation of your future BI practice.
    • Improvement objectives and activities for developing your current BI program.

    Benefits

    • Identification of clear gaps in BI practice maturity.
    • A current state assessment that includes the perspectives of both BI providers and consumers to highlight alignment and/or discrepancies.
    • A future state is defined to provide a benchmark for your BI program.
    • Gaps between the future and current states are identified; recommendations for the gaps are defined.

    Phase 2 outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 2: Evaluate Your Current BI Practice

    Proposed Time to Completion: 1-2 weeks

    Step 2.1: Assess Your Current BI Practice

    Start with an analyst kick-off call:

    • Detail the benefits of conducting multidimensional assessments that involve BI providers as well as consumers.
    • Review Info-Tech’s BI Maturity Model.

    Then complete these activities…

    • SWOT analyses
    • Identification of BI maturity level through a current state assessment

    With these tools & templates:

    BI Practice Assessment Tool

    BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Step 2.2: Envision a Future State for Your BI Practice

    Review findings with an analyst:

    • Discuss overall maturity gaps and patterns in BI perception amongst different units of your organization.
    • Discuss how to translate activity findings into robust initiatives, defining critical success factors for BI development and risk mitigation.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Identify your desired BI patterns and functionalities.
    • Complete a target state assessment for your BI practice.
    • Review capability practice gaps and phase-level metrics.

    With these tools & templates:

    BI Practice Assessment Tool

    BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Phase 2 Results & Insights:

    • A comprehensive assessment of the organization’s current BI practice capabilities and gaps
    • Visualization of BI perception from a variety of business users as well as IT
    • A list of tasks and initiatives for constructing a strategic BI improvement roadmap

    STEP 2.1

    Assess the Current State of Your BI Practice

    Assess your organization’s current BI capabilities

    Step Objectives

    • Understand the definitions and roles of each component of BI.
    • Contextualize BI components to your organization’s environment and current practices.

    Step Activities

    2.1.1 Perform multidimensional SWOT analyses

    2.1.2 Assess current BI and analytical capabilities, Document challenges, constraints, opportunities

    2.1.3 Review the results of your current state assessment

    Outcomes

    • Holistic perspective of current BI strengths and weaknesses according to BI users and providers
    • Current maturity in BI and related data management practices

    Research Support

    • Info-Tech’s Data Management Framework
    • Info-Tech’s BI Practice Assessment Tool
    • Info-Tech’s BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Proposed Participants in this Step

    Project Manager

    Data Architect(s) or Enterprise Architect

    Project Team

    Gather multiple BI perspectives with comprehensive SWOT analyses

    SWOT analysis is an effective tool that helps establish a high-level context for where your practice stands, where it can improve, and the factors that will influence development.

    Strengths

    Best practices, what is working well

    Weaknesses

    Inefficiencies, errors, gaps, shortcomings

    Opportunities

    Review internal and external drivers

    Threats

    Market trends, disruptive forces

    While SWOT is not a new concept, you can add value to SWOT by:

    • Conducting a multi-dimensional SWOT to diversify perspectives – involve the existing BI team, BI management, business executives and other business users.
    • SWOT analyses traditionally provide a retrospective view of your environment. Add a future-looking element by creating improvement tasks/activities at the same time as you detail historical and current performance.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Consider a SWOT with two formats: a private SWOT worksheet and a public SWOT session. Participants will be providing suggestions anonymously while solicited suggestions will be discussed in the public SWOT session to further the discussion.

    Activity: Perform a SWOT analysis in groups to get a holistic view

    2.1.1

    1-2 hours

    This activity will take your project team through a holistic SWOT analysis to gather a variety of stakeholder perception of the current BI practice.

    1. Identify individuals to involve in the SWOT activity. Aim for a diverse pool of participants that are part of the BI practice in different capacities and roles. Solution architects, application managers, business analysts, and business functional unit leaders are a good starting point.
    2. Review the findings summary from Phase 1. You may opt to facilitate this activity with insights from the business context. Each group will be performing the SWOT individually.
    3. The group results will be collected and consolidated to pinpoint common ideas and opinions. Individual group results should be represented by a different color. The core program team will be reviewing the consolidated result as a group.
    4. Document the results of these SWOT activities in the appropriate section of the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template.

    SWOT

    Group 1 Provider Group E.g. The BI Team

    Group 2 Consumer Group E.g. Business End Users

    INPUT

    • IT and business stakeholder perception

    OUTPUT

    • Multi-faceted SWOT analyses
    • Potential BI improvement activities/objectives

    Materials

    • SWOT Analysis section of the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Participants

    • Selected individuals in the enterprise (variable)

    Your organization’s BI maturity is determined by several factors and the degree of immersion into your enterprise

    BI Maturity Level

    A way to categorize your analytics maturity to understand where you are currently and what next steps would be best to increase your BI maturity.

    There are several factors used to determine BI maturity:

    Buy-in and Data Culture

    Determines if there is enterprise-wide buy-in for developing business intelligence and if a data-driven culture exists.

    Business–IT Alignment

    Examines if current BI and analytics operations are appropriately enabling the business objectives.

    Governance Structure

    Focuses on whether or not there is adequate governance in place to provide guidance and structure for BI activities.

    Organization Structure and Talent

    Pertains to how BI operations are distributed across the overall organizational structure and the capabilities of the individuals involved.

    Process

    Reviews analytics-related processes and policies and how they are created and enforced throughout the organization.

    Data

    Deals with analytical data in terms of the level of integration, data quality, and usability.

    Technology

    Explores the opportunities in building a fit-for-purpose analytics platform and consolidation opportunities.

    Evaluate Your Current BI Practice with the CMMI model

    To assess BI, Info-Tech uses the CMMI model for rating capabilities in each of the function areas on a scale of 1-5. (“0” and “0.5” values are used for non-existent or emerging capabilities.)

    The image shows an example of a CMMI model

    Use Info-Tech’s BI Maturity Model as a guide for identifying your current analytics competence

    Leverage a BI strategy to revamp your BI program to strive for a high analytics maturity level. In the future you should be doing more than just traditional BI. You will perform self-service BI, predictive analytics, and data science.

    Ad Hoc Developing Defined Managed Trend Setting
    Questions What’s wrong? What happened? What is happening? What happened, is happening, and will happen? What if? So what?
    Scope One business problem at a time One particular functional area Multiple functional areas Multiple functional areas in an integrated fashion Internal plus internet scale data
    Toolset Excel, Access, primitive query tools Reporting tools or BI BI BI, business analytics tools Plus predictive platforms, data science tools
    Delivery Model IT delivers ad hoc reports IT delivers BI reports IT delivers BI reports and some self-service BI Self-service BI and report creation at the business units Plus predictive models and data science projects
    Mindset Firefighting using data Manage using data Analyze using data; shared tooling Data is an asset, shared data Data driven
    BI Org. Structure Data analysts in IT BI BI program BI CoE Data Innovation CoE

    Leverage Info-Tech’s BI Practice Assessment Tool to define your BI current state

    BI Practice Assessment Tool

    1. Assess Current State
    • Eight BI practice areas to assess maturity.
    • Based on CMMI maturity scale.
  • Visualize Current State Results
    • Determine your BI maturity level.
    • Identify areas with outstanding maturity.
    • Uncover areas with low maturity.
    • Visualize the presence of misalignments.
  • Target State
    • Tackle target state from two views: business and IT.
    • Calculate gaps between target and current state.
  • Visualize Target State and Gaps
    • A heat map diagram to compare the target state and the current state.
    • Show both current and target maturity levels.
    • Detailed charts to show results for each area.
    • Detailed list of recommendations.

    Purposes:

    • Assess your BI maturity.
    • Visualize maturity assessment to quickly spot misalignments, gaps, and opportunities.
    • Provide right-sized recommendations.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Assessing current and target states is only the beginning. The real value comes from the interpretation and analysis of the results. Use visualizations of multiple viewpoints and discuss the results in groups to come up with the most effective ideas for your strategy and roadmap.

    Activity: Conduct a current state assessment of your BI practice maturity

    2.1.2

    2-3 hours

    Use the BI Practice Assessment Tool to establish a baseline for your current BI capabilities and maturity.

    1. Navigate to Tab 2. Current State Assessment in the BI Practice Assessment Tool and complete the current state assessment together or in small groups. If running a series of assessments, do not star or scratch every time. Use the previous group’s results to start the conversation with the users.
    2. Info-Tech suggests the following groups participate in the completion of the assessment to holistically assess BI and to uncover misalignment:

      Providers Consumers
      CIO & BI Management BI Work Groups (developers, analysts, modelers) Business Unit #1 Business Unit #2 Business Unit #3
    3. For each assessment question, answer the current level of maturity in terms of:
      1. Initial/Ad hoc – the starting point for use of a new or undocumented repeat process
      2. Developing – the process is documented such that it is repeatable
      3. Defined – the process is defined/confirmed as a standard business process
      4. Managed and Measurable – the process is quantitatively managed in accordance with agreed-upon metrics.
      5. Optimized – the process includes process optimization/improvement.

    INPUT

    • Observations of current maturity

    OUTPUT

    • Comprehensive current state assessment

    Materials

    • BI Practice Assessment Tool
    • Current State Assessment section of the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Participants

    • Selected individuals as suggested by the assessment tool

    Info-Tech Insight

    Discuss the rationale for your answers as a group. Document the comments and observations as they may be helpful in formulating the final strategy and roadmap.

    Activity: Review and analyze the results of the current state assessment

    2.1.3

    2-3 hours

    1. Navigate to Tab 3. Current State Results in the BI Practice Assessment Tool and review the findings:

    The tool provides a brief synopsis of your current BI state. Review the details of your maturity level and see where this description fits your organization and where there may be some discrepancies. Add additional comments to your current state summary in the BI Strategy and Roadmap Document.

    In addition to reviewing the attributes of your maturity level, consider the following:

    1. What are the knowns – The knowns confirm your understanding on the current landscape.
  • What are the unknowns – The unknowns show you the blind spots. They are very important to give you an alternative view of the your current state. The group should discuss those blind spots and determine what to do with them.
  • Activity: Review and analyze the results of the current state assessment (cont.)

    2.1.3

    2-3 hours

    2. Tab 3 will also visualize a breakdown of your maturity by BI practice dimension. Use this graphic as a preliminary method to identify where your organization is excelling and where it may need improvement.

    Better Practices

    Consider: What have you done in the areas where you perform well?

    Candidates for Improvement

    Consider: What can you do to improve these areas? What are potential barriers to improvement?

    STEP 2.2

    Envision a Future State for Your Organization’s BI Practice

    Detail the capabilities of your next generation BI practice

    Step Objectives

    • Create guiding principles that will shape your organization’s ideal BI program.
    • Pinpoint where your organization needs to improve across several BI practice dimensions.
    • Develop approaches to remedy current impediments to BI evolution.
    • Step Activities

      2.2.1 Define guiding principles for the future state

      2.2.2 Define the target state of your BI practice

      2.2.3 Confirm requirements for BI Styles by management group

      2.2.4 Analyze gaps in your BI practice and generate improvement activities and objectives

      2.2.5 Define the critical success factors for future BI

      2.2.6 Identify potential risks for your future state and create a mitigation plan

    Outcomes

    • Defined landscape for future BI capabilities, including desired BI functionalities.
    • Identification of crucial gaps and improvement points to include in a BI roadmap.
    • Updated BI Styles Usage sheet.

    Research Support

    • Info-Tech’s Data Management Framework
    • Info-Tech’s BI Practice Assessment Tool
    • Info-Tech’s BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Proposed Participants in this Step

    Project Manager

    Data Architect(s) or Enterprise Architect

    Project Team

    Define guiding principles to drive your future state envisioning

    Envisioning a BI future state is essentially architecting the future for your BI program. It is very similar to enterprise architecture (EA). Guiding principles are widely used in enterprise architecture. This best practice should also be used in BI envisioning.

    Benefits of Guiding Principles in a BI Context

    • BI planning involves a number of business units. Defining high-level future state principles helps to establish a common ground for those different business units.
    • Ensure the next generation BI aligns with the corporate enterprise architecture and data architecture principles.
    • Provide high-level guidance without depicting detailed solutioning by leaving room for innovation.

    Sample Principles for BI Future State

    1. BI should be fit for purpose. BI is a business technology that helps business users.
    2. Business–IT collaboration should be encouraged to ensure deliverables are relevant to the business.
    3. Focus on continuous improvement on data quality.
    4. Explore opportunities to onboard and integrate new datasets to create a holistic view of your data.
    5. Organize and present data in an easy-to-consume, easy-to-digest fashion.
    6. BI should be accessible to everything, as soon as they have a business case.
    7. Do not train just on using the platform. Train on the underlying data and business model as well.
    8. Develop a training platform where trainees can play around with the data without worrying about messing it up.

    Activity: Define future state guiding principles for your BI practice

    2.2.1

    1-2 hours

    Guiding principles are broad statements that are fundamental to how your organization will go about its activities. Use this as an opportunity to gather relevant stakeholders and solidify how your BI practice should perform moving forward.

    1. To ensure holistic and comprehensive future state principles, invite participants from the business, the data management team, and the enterprise architecture team. If you do not have an enterprise architecture practice, invite people that are involved in building the enterprise architecture. Five to ten people is ideal.
    2. BI Future State

      Awareness Buy-in Business-IT Alignment Governance Org. Structure; People Process; Policies; Standards Data Technology
    3. Once the group has some high-level ideas on what the future state looks like, brainstorm guiding principles that will facilitate the achievement of the future state (see above).
    4. Document the future state principles in the Future State Principles for BI section of the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    INPUT

    • Existing enterprise architecture guiding principles
    • High-level concept of future state BI

    OUTPUT

    • Guiding principles for prospective BI practice

    Materials

    • Future State Principles section of the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Participants

    • Business representatives
    • IT representatives
    • The EA group

    Leverage prototypes to facilitate a continuous dialogue with end users en route to creating the final deliverable

    At the end of the day, BI makes data and information available to the business communities. It has to be fit for purpose and relevant to the business. Prototypes are an effective way to ensure relevant deliverables are provided to the necessary users. Prototyping makes your future state a lot closer and a lot more business friendly.

    Simple Prototypes

    • Simple paper-based, whiteboard-based prototypes with same notes.
    • The most basic communication tool that facilitates the exchange of ideas.
    • Often used in Joint Application Development (JAD) sessions.
    • Improve business and IT collaboration.
    • Can be used to amend requirements documents.

    Discussion Possibilities

    • Initial ideation at the beginning
    • Align everyone on the same page
    • Explain complex ideas/layouts
    • Improve collaboration

    Elaborated Prototypes

    • Demonstrates the possibilities of BI in a risk-free environment.
    • Creates initial business value with your new BI platform.
    • Validates the benefits of BI to the organization.
    • Generates interest and support for BI from senior management.
    • Prepares BI team for the eventual enterprise-wide deployment.

    Discussion Possibilities

    • Validate and refine requirements
    • Fail fast, succeed fast
    • Acts as checkpoints
    • Proxy for the final working deliverable

    Leverage Info-Tech’s BI Practice Assessment Tool to define your BI target state and visualize capability gaps

    BI Practice Assessment Tool

    1. Assess Current State
    • Eight BI practice areas to assess maturity.
    • Based on CMMI maturity scale.
  • Visualize Current State Results
    • Determine your BI maturity level.
    • Identify areas with outstanding maturity.
    • Uncover areas with low maturity.
    • Visualize the presence of misalignments.
  • Target State
    • Tackle target state from two views: business and IT.
    • Calculate gaps between target and current state.
  • Visualize Target State and Gaps
    • A heat map diagram to compare the target state and the current state.
    • Show both current and target maturity levels.
    • Detailed charts to show results for each area.
    • Detailed list of recommendations.

    Purposes:

    • Assess your BI maturity.
    • Visualize maturity assessment to quickly spot misalignments, gaps, and opportunities.
    • Provide right-sized recommendations.

    Document essential findings in Info-Tech’s BI Strategy and Roadmap Template.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Assessing current and target states is only the beginning. The real value comes from the interpretation and analyses of the results. Use visualizations of multiple viewpoints and discuss the results in groups to come up with the most effective ideas for your strategy and roadmap.

    Activity: Define the target state for your BI practice

    2.2.2

    2 hours

    This exercise takes your team through establishing the future maturity of your BI practice across several dimensions.

    1. Envisioning of the future state will involve input from the business side as well as the IT department.
    2. The business and IT groups should get together separately and determine the target state maturity of each of the BI practice components:

    The image is a screenshot of Tab 4: Target State Evaluation of the BI Practice Assessment Tool

    INPUT

    • Desired future practice capabilities

    OUTPUT

    • Target state assessment

    Materials

    • Tab 4 of the BI Practice Assessment Tool

    Participants

    • Business representatives
    • IT representatives

    Activity: Define the target state for your BI practice (cont.)

    2.2.2

    2 hours

    2. The target state levels from the two groups will be averaged in the column “Target State Level.” The assessment tool will automatically calculate the gaps between future state value and the current state maturity determined in Step 2.1. Significant gaps in practice maturity will be highlighted in red; smaller or non-existent gaps will appear green.

    The image is a screenshot of Tab 4: Target State Evaluation of the BI Practice Assessment Tool with Gap highlighted.

    INPUT

    • Desired future practice capabilities

    OUTPUT

    • Target state assessment

    Materials

    • Tab 4 of the BI Practice Assessment Tool

    Participants

    • Business representatives
    • IT representatives

    Activity: Revisit the BI Style Analysis sheet to define new report and analytical requirements by C-Level

    2.2.3

    1-2 hours

    The information needs for each executive is unique to their requirements and management style. During this exercise you will determine the reporting and analytical needs for an executive in regards to content, presentation and cadence and then select the BI style that suite them best.

    1. To ensure a holistic and comprehensive need assessment, invite participants from the business and BI team. Discuss what data the executive currently use to base decisions on and explore how the different BI styles may assist. Sample reports or mock-ups can be used for this purpose.
    2. Document the type of report and required content using the BI Style Tool.
    3. The BI Style Tool will then guide the BI team in the type of reporting to develop and the level of Self-Service BI that is required. The tool can also be used for product selection.

    INPUT

    • Information requirements for C-Level Executives

    OUTPUT

    • BI style(s) that are appropriate for an executive’s needs

    Materials

    • BI Style Usage sheet from BI Strategy and Roadmap Template
    • Sample Reports

    Participants

    • Business representatives
    • BI representatives

    Visualization tools facilitate a more comprehensive understanding of gaps in your existing BI practice

    Having completed both current and target state assessments, the BI Practice Assessment Tool allows you to compare the results from multiple angles.

    At a higher level, you can look at your maturity level:

    At a detailed level, you can drill down to the dimensional level and item level.

    The image is a screenshots from Tab 4: Target State Evaluation of the BI Practice Assessment Tool

    At a detailed level, you can drill down to the dimensional level and item level.

    Activity: Analyze gaps in BI practice capabilities and generate improvement objectives/activities

    2.2.4

    2 hours

    This interpretation exercise helps you to make sense of the BI practice assessment results to provide valuable inputs for subsequent strategy and roadmap formulation.

    1. IT management and the BI team should be involved in this exercise. Business SMEs should be consulted frequently to obtain clarifications on what their ideal future state entails.
    2. Begin this exercise by reviewing the heat map and identifying:

    • Areas with very large gaps
    • Areas with small gaps

    Areas with large gaps

    Consider: Is the target state feasible and achievable? What are ways we can improve incrementally in this area? What is the priority for addressing this gap?

    Areas with small/no gaps

    Consider: Can we learn from those areas? Are we setting the bar too low for our capabilities?

    INPUT

    • Current and target state visualizations

    OUTPUT

    • Gap analysis (Tab 5)

    Materials

    • Tab 5 of the BI Practice Assessment Tool
    • Future State Assessment Results section of the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Participants

    • Business representatives
    • IT representatives

    Activity: Analyze gaps in BI practice capabilities and generate improvement objectives/activities (cont.)

    2.2.4

    2 hours

    2. Discuss the differences in the current and target state maturity level descriptions. Questions to ask include:

    • What are the prerequisites before we can begin to build the future state?
    • Is the organization ready for that future state? If not, how do we set expectations and vision for the future state?
    • Do we have the necessary competencies, time, and support to achieve our BI vision?

    INPUT

    • Current and target state visualizations

    OUTPUT

    • Gap analysis (Tab 5)

    Materials

    • Tab 5 of the BI Practice Assessment Tool
    • Future State Assessment Results section of the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Participants

    • Business representatives
    • IT representatives

    Activity: Analyze gaps in BI practice capabilities and generate improvement objectives/activities (cont.)

    2.2.4

    2 hours

    3. Have the same group members reconvene and discuss the recommendations at the BI practice dimension level on Tab 5. of the BI Practice Assessment Tool. These recommendations can be used as improvement actions or translated into objectives for building your BI capabilities.

    Example

    The heat map displayed the largest gap between target state and current state in the technology dimension. The detailed drill-down chart will further illustrate which aspect(s) of the technology dimension is/are showing the most room for improvement in order to better direct your objective and initiative creation.

    The image is of an example and recommendations.

    Considerations:

    • What dimension parameters have the largest gaps? And why?
    • Is there a different set of expectations for the future state?

    Define critical success factors to direct your future state

    Critical success factors (CSFs) are the essential factors or elements required for ensuring the success of your BI program. They are used to inform organizations with things they should focus on to be successful.

    Common Provider (IT Department) CSFs

    • BI governance structure and organization is created.
    • Training is provided for the BI users and the BI team.
    • BI standards are in place.
    • BI artifacts rely on quality data.
    • Data is organized and presented in a usable fashion.
    • A hybrid BI delivery model is established.
    • BI on BI; a measuring plan has to be in place.

    Common Consumer (Business) CSFs

    • Measurable business results have been improved.
    • Business targets met/exceeded.
    • Growth plans accelerated.
    • World-class training to empower BI users.
    • Continuous promotion of a data-driven culture.
    • IT–business partnership is established.
    • Collaborative requirements gathering processes.
    • Different BI use cases are supported.

    …a data culture is essential to the success of analytics. Being involved in a lot of Bay Area start-ups has shown me that those entrepreneurs that are born with the data DNA, adopt the data culture and BI naturally. Other companies should learn from these start-ups and grow the data culture to ensure BI adoption.

    – Cameran Hetrick, Senior Director of Data Science & Analytics, thredUP

    Activity: Define provider and consumer critical success factors for your future BI capabilities

    2.2.5

    2 hours

    Create critical success factors that are important to both BI providers and BI consumers.

    1. Divide relevant stakeholders into two groups:
    2. BI Provider (aka IT) BI Consumer (aka Business)
    3. Write two headings on the board: Objective and Critical Success Factors. Write down each of the objectives created in Phase 1.
    4. Divide the group into small teams and assign each team an objective. For each objective, ask the following question:
    5. What needs to be put in place to ensure that this objective is achieved?

      The answer to the question is your candidate CSF. Write CSFs on sticky notes and stick them by the relevant objective.

    6. Rationalize and consolidate CSFs. Evaluate the list of candidate CSFs to find the essential elements for achieving success.
    7. For each CSF, identify at least one key performance indicator that will serve as an appropriate metric for tracking achievement.

    As you evaluate candidate CSFs, you may uncover new objectives for achieving your future state BI.

    INPUT

    • Business objectives

    OUTPUT

    • A list of critical success factors mapped to business objectives

    Materials

    • Whiteboard and colored sticky notes
    • CSFs for the Future State section of the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Participants

    • Business and IT representatives
    • CIO
    • Head of BI

    Round out your strategy for BI growth by evaluating risks and developing mitigation plans

    A risk matrix is a useful tool that allows you to track risks on two dimensions: probability and impact. Use this matrix to help organize and prioritize risk, as well as develop mitigation strategies and contingency plans appropriately.

    Example of a risk matrix using colour coding

    Info-Tech Insight

    Tackling risk mitigation is essentially purchasing insurance. You cannot insure everything – focus your investments on mitigating risks with a reasonably high impact and high probability.

    Be aware of some common barriers that arise in the process of implementing a BI strategy

    These are some of the most common BI risks based on Info-Tech’s research:

    Low Impact Medium Impact High Impact
    High Probability
    • Users revert back to Microsoft Excel to analyze data.
    • BI solution does not satisfy the business need.
    • BI tools become out of sync with new strategic direction.
    • Poor documentation creates confusion and reduces user adoption.
    • Fail to address data issues: quality, integration, definition.
    • Inadequate communication with stakeholders throughout the project.
    • Users find the BI tool interface too confusing.
    Medium Probability
    • Fail to define and monitor KPIs.
    • Poor training results in low user adoption.
    • Organization culture is resistant to the change.
    • Lack of support from the sponsors.
    • No governance over BI.
    • Poor training results in misinformed users.
    Low Probability
    • Business units independently invest in BI as silos.

    Activity: Identify potential risks for your future state and create a mitigation plan

    2.2.6

    1 hour

    As part of developing your improvement actions, use this activity to brainstorm some high-level plans for mitigating risks associated with those actions.

    Example:

    Users find the BI tool interface too confusing.

    1. Use the probability-impact matrix to identify risks systematically. Collectively vote on the probability and impact for each risk.
    2. Risk mitigation. Risk can be mitigated by three approaches:
    3. A. Reducing its probability

      B. Reducing its impact

      C. Reducing both

      Option A: Brainstorm ways to reduce risk probability

      E.g. The probability of the above risk may be reduced by user training. With training, the probability of confused end users will be reduced.

      Option B: Brainstorm ways to reduce risk impact

      E.g. The impact can be reduced by ensuring having two end users validate each other’s reports before making a major decision.

    4. Document your high-level mitigation strategies in the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template.

    INPUT

    • Step 2.2 outputs

    OUTPUT

    • High-level risk mitigation plans

    Materials

    • Risks and Mitigation section of the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Participants

    • BI sponsor
    • CIO
    • Head of BI

    Translate your findings and ideas into actions that will be integrated into the BI strategy and roadmap

    As you progress through each phase, document findings and ideas as they arise. By phase end, hold a brainstorming session with the project team focused on documenting findings and ideas and substantiating them into improvement actions.

    Translated findings and ideas into actions that will be integrated into the BI strategy and roadmap.

    Ask yourself how BI or analytics can be used to address the gaps and explore opportunities uncovered in each phase. For example, in Phase 1, how do current BI capabilities impede the realization of the business vision?

    Document and prioritize Phase 2 findings, ideas, and action items

    2.2.7

    1-2 hours

    1. Reconvene as a group to review the findings, ideas, and actions harvested in Phase 2. Write the findings, ideas, and actions on sticky notes.
    2. Prioritize the sticky notes to yield those with high business value and low implementation effort. View some sample findings below:
    3. High Business Value, Low Effort High Business Value, High Effort
      Low Business Value, High Effort Low Business Value, High Effort

      Phase 2

      Sample Phase 2 Findings Found a gap between the business expectation and the existing BI content they are getting.
      Our current maturity level is “Level 2 – Operational.” Almost everyone thinks we should be at least “Level 3 – Tactical” with some level 4 elements.
      Found an error in a sales report. A quick fix is identified.
      The current BI program is not able to keep up with the demand.
    4. Select the top items and document the findings in the BI Strategy Roadmap Template. The findings will be used to build a Roadmap in Phase 3.

    INPUT

    • Phase 2 activities

    OUTPUT

    • Other Phase 2 Findings section of the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • Project manger
    • Project team
    • Business stakeholders

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    2.1.1

    Determine your current BI maturity level

    The analyst will take your project team through Info-Tech’s BI Practice Assessment Tool, which collects perspectives from BI consumer and provider groups on multiple facets of your BI practice in order to establish a current maturity level.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts

    2.2.1

    Define guiding principles for your target BI state

    Using enterprise architecture principles as a starting point, our analyst will facilitate exercises to help your team establish high-level standards for your future BI practice.

    2.2.2-2.2.3

    Establish your desired BI patterns and matching functionalities

    In developing your BI practice, your project team will have to decide what BI-specific capabilities are most important to your organization. Our analyst will take your team through several BI patterns that Info-Tech has identified and discuss how to bridge the gap between these patterns, linking them to specific functional requirements in a BI solution.

    2.2.4-2.2.5

    Analyze the gaps in your BI practice capabilities

    Our analyst will guide your project team through a number of visualizations and explanations produced by our assessment tool in order to pinpoint the problem areas and generate improvement ideas.

    Phase 3

    Create a BI Roadmap for Continuous Improvement

    Build a Reporting and Analytics Strategy

    Create a BI roadmap for continuous improvement

    Phase 3 Overarching Insight

    The benefit of creating a comprehensive and actionable roadmap is twofold: not only does it keep BI providers accountable and focused on creating incremental improvement, but a roadmap helps to build momentum around the overall project, provides a continuous delivery of success stories, and garners grassroots-level support throughout the organization for BI as a key strategic imperative.

    Understand the Business Context to Rationalize Your BI Landscape Evaluate Your Current BI Practice Create a BI Roadmap for Continuous Improvement
    Establish the Business Context
    • Business Vision, Goals, Key Drivers
    • Business Case Presentation
    • High-Level ROI
    Assess Your Current BI Maturity
    • SWOT Analysis
    • BI Practice Assessment
    • Summary of Current State
    Construct a BI Initiative Roadmap
    • BI Improvement Initiatives
    • BI Strategy and Roadmap
    Access Existing BI Environment
    • BI Perception Survey Framework
    • Usage Analyses
    • BI Report Inventory
    Envision BI Future State
    • BI Patterns
    • BI Practice Assessment
    • List of Functions
    Plan for Continuous Improvement
    • Excel Governance Policy
    • BI Ambassador Network Draft
    Undergo Requirements Gathering
    • Requirements Gathering Principles
    • Overall BI Requirements

    Phase 3 overview

    Detailed Overview

    Step 1: Establish Your BI Initiative Roadmap

    Step 2: Identify Opportunities to Enhance Your BI Practice

    Step 3: Create Analytics Strategy

    Step 4: Define CSF and metrics to monitor success of BI and analytics

    Outcomes

    • Consolidate business intelligence improvement objectives into robust initiatives.
    • Prioritize improvement initiatives by cost, effort, and urgency.
    • Create a one-year, two-year, or three-year timeline for completion of your BI improvement initiatives.
    • Identify supplementary programs that will facilitate the smooth execution of road-mapped initiatives.

    Benefits

    • Clear characterization of comprehensive initiatives with a detailed timeline to keep team members accountable.

    Revisit project metrics to track phase progress

    Goals for Phase 3:

    • Put everything together. Findings and observations from Phase 1 and 2 are rationalized in this phase to develop data initiatives and create a strategy and roadmap for BI.
    • Continuous improvements. Your BI program is evolving and improving over time. The program should allow you to have faster, better, and more comprehensive information.

    Info-Tech’s Suggested Metrics for Tracking Phase 3 Goals

    Practice Improvement Metrics Data Collection and Calculation Expected Improvement
    Program Level Metrics Efficiency
    • Time to information
    • Self-service penetration
    • Derive from the ticket management system
    • Derive from the BI platform
    • 10% reduction in time to information
    • Achieve 10-15% self-service penetration
    • Effectiveness
    • BI Usage
    • Data quality
    • Derive from the BI platform
    • Data quality perception
    • Majority of the users use BI on a daily basis
    • 15% increase in data quality perception
    Comprehensiveness
    • # of integrated datasets
    • # of strategic decisions made
    • Derive from the data integration platform
    • Decision-making perception
    • Onboard 2-3 new data domains per year
    • 20% increase in decision-making perception

    Learn more about the CIO Business Vision program.

    Intangible Metrics:

    Tap into the results of Info-Tech’s CIO Business Vision diagnostic to monitor the changes in business-user satisfaction as you implement the initiatives in your BI improvement roadmap.

    Phase 3 outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that helps you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 3: Create a BI Roadmap for Continuous Improvement

    Proposed Time to Completion: 1-2 weeks

    Step 3.1: Construct a BI Improvement Initiative Roadmap

    Start with an analyst kick off call:

    • Review findings and insights from completion of activities pertaining to current and future state assessments
    • Discuss challenges around consolidating activities into initiatives

    Then complete these activities…

    • Collect improvement objectives/tasks from previous phases
    • Develop comprehensive improvement initiatives
    • Leverage value-effort matrix activities to prioritize these initiatives and place them along an improvement roadmap

    With these tools & templates:

    BI Initiatives and Roadmap Tool

    BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Step 3.2: Continuous Improvement Opportunities for BI

    Review findings with analyst:

    • Review completed BI improvement initiatives and roadmap
    • Discuss guidelines presenting a finalized improvement to the relevant committee or stakeholders
    • Discuss additional policies and programs that can serve to enhance your established BI improvement roadmap

    Then complete these activities…

    • Present BI improvement roadmap to relevant stakeholders
    • Develop Info-Tech’s recommended supplementary policies and programs for BI

    With these tools & templates:

    BI Strategy and Roadmap Executive Presentation Template

    Phase 3 Results & Insights:

    • Comprehensive initiatives with associated tasks/activities consolidated and prioritized in an improvement roadmap

    STEP 3.1

    Construct a BI Improvement Initiative Roadmap

    Build an improvement initiative roadmap to solidify your revamped BI strategy

    Step Objectives

    • Bring together activities and objectives for BI improvement to form initiatives
    • Develop a fit-for-purpose roadmap aligned with your BI strategy

    Step Activities

    3.1.1 Characterize individual improvement objectives and activities ideated in previous phases.

    3.1.2 Synthesize and detail overall BI improvement initiatives.

    3.1.3 Create a plan of action by placing initiatives on a roadmap.

    Outcomes

    • Detailed BI improvement initiatives, prioritized by value and effort
    • Defined roadmap for completion of tasks associated with each initiative and accountability

    Research Support

    • Info-Tech’s BI Initiatives and Roadmap Tool

    Proposed Participants in this Step

    Project Manager

    Project Team

    Create detailed BI strategy initiatives by bringing together the objectives listed in the previous phases

    When developing initiatives, all components of the initiative need to be considered, from its objectives and goals to its benefits, risks, costs, effort required, and relevant stakeholders.

    Use outputs from previous project steps as inputs to the initiative and roadmap building:

    The image shows the previous project steps as inputs to the initiative and roadmap building, with arrow pointing from one to the next.

    Determining the dependencies that exist between objectives will enable the creation of unique initiatives with associated to-do items or tasks.

    • Group objectives into similar buckets with dependencies
    • Select one overarching initiative
    • Adapt remaining objectives into tasks of the main initiative
    • Add any additional tasks

    Leverage Info-Tech’s BI Initiatives and Roadmap Tool to build a fit-for-purpose improvement roadmap

    BI Initiatives and Roadmap Tool

    Overview

    Use the BI Initiatives and Roadmap Tool to develop comprehensive improvement initiatives and add them to a BI strategy improvement roadmap.

    Recommended Participants

    • BI project team

    Tool Guideline

    Tab 1. Instructions Use this tab to get an understanding as to how the tool works.
    Tab 2. Inputs Use this tab to customize the inputs used in the tool.
    Tab 3. Activities Repository Use this tab to list and prioritize activities, to determine dependencies between them, and build comprehensive initiatives with them.
    Tab 4. Improvement Initiatives Use this tab to develop detailed improvement initiatives that will form the basis of the roadmap. Map these initiatives to activities from Tab 3.
    Tab 5. Improvement Roadmap Use this tab to create your BI strategy improvement roadmap, assigning timelines and accountability to initiatives and tasks, and to monitor your project performance over time.

    Activity: Consolidate BI activities into the tool and assign dependencies and priorities

    3.1.1

  • 2 hours
    1. Have one person from the BI project team populate Tab 3. Activities Repository with the BI strategy activities that were compiled in Phases 1 and 2. Use drop-downs to indicate in which phase the objective was originally ideated.
    2. With BI project team executives, discuss and assign dependencies between activities in the Dependencies columns. A dependency exists if:
    • An activity requires consideration of another activity.
    • An activity requires the completion of another activity.
    • Two activities should be part of the same initiative.
    • Two activities are very similar in nature.
  • Then discuss and assign priorities to each activity in the Priority column using input from previous Phases. For example, if an activity was previously indicated as critical to the business, if a similar activity appears multiple times, or if an activity has several dependencies, it should be higher priority.
  • Inputs

    • BI improvement activities created in Phases 1 and 2

    Output

    • Activities with dependencies and priorities

    Materials

    • BI Initiatives and Roadmap Tool

    Participants

    • BI project team

    Activity: Consolidate BI activities into the tool and assign dependencies and priorities (cont’d.)

    3.1.1

    2 hours

    Screenshot of Tab 3. BI Activities Repository, with samples improvement activities, dependencies, statuses, and priorities

    The image is of a screenshot of Tab 3. BI Activities Repository, with samples improvement activities, dependencies, statuses, and priorities.

    Revisit the outputs of your current state assessment and note which activities have already been completed in the “Status” column, to avoid duplication of your efforts.

    When classifying the status of items in your activity repository, distinguish between broader activities (potential initiatives) and granular activities (tasks).

    Activity: Customize project inputs and build out detailed improvement initiatives

    3.1.2

    1.5 hours

    1. Follow instructions on Tab 2. Inputs to customize inputs you would like to use for your project.
    2. Review the activities repository and select up to 12 overarching initiatives based on the activities with extreme or highest priority and your own considerations.
    • Rewording where necessary, transfer the names of your initiatives in the banners provided on Tab 4. Improvement Initiatives.
    • On Tab 3, indicate these activities as “Selected (initiatives)” in the Status column.
  • In Tab 4, develop detailed improvement initiatives by indicating the owner, taxonomy, start and end periods, cost and effort estimates, goal, benefit/value, and risks of each initiative.
  • Use drop-downs to list “Related activities,” which will become tasks under each initiative.
    • activities with dependency to the initiative
    • activities that lead to the same goal or benefit/value of the main initiative

    Screenshot of the Improvement Initiative template, to be used for developing comprehensive initiatives

    <p data-verified=The image is a screenshot of the Improvement Initiative template, to be used for developing comprehensive initiatives.">

    Inputs

    • Tab 3. Activities Repository

    Output

    • Unique and detailed improvement initiatives

    Materials

    • BI Initiatives and Roadmap Tool
    • BI Initiatives section of the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Participants

    • BI project team

    Visual representations of your initiative landscape can aid in prioritizing tasks and executing the roadmap

    Building a comprehensive BI program will be a gradual process involving a variety of stakeholders. Different initiatives in your roadmap will either be completed sequentially or in parallel to one another, given dependencies and available resources. The improvement roadmap should capture and represent this information.

    To determine the order in which main initiatives should be completed, exercises such as a value–effort map can be very useful.

    Example: Value–Effort Map for a BI Project

    Initiatives that are high value–low effort are found in the upper left quadrant and are bolded; These may be your four primary initiatives. In addition, initiative five is valuable to the business and critical to the project’s success, so it too is a priority despite requiring high effort. Note that you need to consider dependencies to prioritize these key initiatives.

    Value–Effort Map for a BI Project
    1. Data profiling techniques training
    2. Improve usage metrics
    3. Communication plan for BI
    4. Staff competency evaluation
    5. Formalize practice capabilities
    6. Competency improvement plan program
    7. Metadata architecture improvements
    8. EDW capability improvements
    9. Formalize oversight for data manipulation

    This exercise is best performed using a white board and sticky notes, and axes can be customized to fit your needs (E.g. cost, risk, time, etc.).

    Activity: Build an overall BI strategy improvement roadmap for the entire project

    3.1.3

    45 minutes

    The BI Strategy Improvement Roadmap (Tab 5 of the BI Initiatives and Roadmap Tool) has been populated with your primary initiatives and related tasks. Read the instructions provided at the top of Tab 5.

    1. Use drop-downs to assign a Start Period and End Period to each initiative (already known) and each task (determined here). As you do so, the roadmap will automatically fill itself in. This is where the value–effort map or other prioritization exercises may help.
    2. Assign Task Owners reporting Managers.
    3. Update the Status and Notes columns on an ongoing basis. Hold meetings with task owners and managers about blocked or overdue items.
    • Updating status should also be an ongoing maintenance requirement for Tab 3 in order to stay up to date on which activities have been selected as initiatives or tasks, are completed, or are not yet acted upon.

    Screenshot of the BI Improvement Roadmap (Gantt chart) showing an example initiative with tasks, and assigned timeframes, owners, and status updates.

    INPUTS

    • Tab 3. Activities Repository
    • Tab 4. Improvement Initiatives

    OUTPUT

    • BI roadmap

    Materials

    • BI Initiatives and Roadmap Tool
    • Roadmap section of the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Participants

    • BI project team

    Obtain approval for your BI strategy roadmap by organizing and presenting project findings

    Use a proprietary presentation template

    Recommended Participants

    • Project sponsor
    • Relevant IT & business executives
    • CIO
    • BI project team

    Materials & Requirements

    Develop your proprietary presentation template with:

    • Results from Phases 1 and 2 and Step 3.1
    • Information from:
      • Info-Tech’s Build a Reporting and Analytics Strategy
    • Screen shots of outputs from the:
      • BI Practice Assessment Tool
      • BI Initiatives and Roadmap Tool

    Next Steps

    Following the approval of your roadmap, begin to plan the implementation of your first initiatives.

    Overall Guidelines

    • Invite recommended participants to an approval meeting.
    • Present your project’s findings with the goal of gaining key stakeholder support for implementing the roadmap.
    1. Set the scene using BI vision & objectives.
    2. Present the results and roadmap next.
    3. Dig deeper into specific issues by touching on the important components of this blueprint to generate a succinct and cohesive presentation.
  • Make the necessary changes and updates stemming from discussion notes during this meeting.
  • Submit a formal summary of findings and roadmap to your governing body for review and approval (e.g. BI steering committee, BI CoE).
  • Info-Tech Insight

    At this point, it is likely that you already have the support to implement a data quality improvement roadmap. This meeting is about the specifics and the ROI.

    Maximize support by articulating the value of the data quality improvement strategy for the organization’s greater information management capabilities. Emphasize the business requirements and objectives that will be enhanced as a result of tackling the recommended initiatives, and note any additional ramifications of not doing so.

    Leverage Info-Tech’s presentation template to present your BI strategy to the executives

    Use the BI Strategy and Roadmap Executive Presentation Template to present your most important findings and brilliant ideas to the business executives and ensure your BI program is endorsed. Business executives can also learn about how the BI strategy empowers them and how they can help in the BI journey.

    Important Messages to Convey

    • Executive summary of the presentation
    • Current challenges faced by the business
    • BI benefits and associated opportunities
    • SWOT analyses of the current BI
    • BI end-user satisfaction survey
    • BI vision, mission, and goals
    • BI initiatives that take you to the future state
    • (Updated) Analytical Strategy
    • Roadmap that depicts the timeline

    STEP 3.2

    Continuous Improvement Opportunities for BI

    Create supplementary policies and programs to augment your BI strategy

    Step Objectives

    • Develop a plan for encouraging users to continue to use Excel, but in a way that does not compromise overall BI effectiveness.
    • Take steps to establish a positive organizational culture around BI.

    Step Activities

    3.2.1 Construct a concrete policy to integrate Excel use with your new BI strategy.

    3.2.2 Map out the foundation for a BI Ambassador network.

    Outcomes

    • Business user understanding of where Excel manipulation should and should not occur
    • Foundation for recognizing exceptional BI users and encouraging development of enterprise-wide business intelligence

    Research Support

    • Info-Tech’s BI Initiatives and Roadmap Tool
    • Info-Tech’s BI Strategy and Roadmap Template

    Proposed Participants in this Step

    Project Manager

    Project Team

    Additional Business Users

    Establish Excel governance to better serve Excel users while making sure they comply with policies

    Excel is the number one BI tool

    • BI applications are developed to support information needs.
    • The reality is that you will never migrate all Excel users to BI. Some Excel users will continue to use it. The key is to support them while imposing governance.
    • The goal is to direct them to use the data in BI or in the data warehouse instead of extracting their own data from various source systems.

    The Tactic: Centralize data extraction and customize delivery

    • Excel users formerly extracted data directly from the production system, cleaned up the data, manipulated the data by including their own business logic, and presented the data in graphs and pivot tables.
    • With BI, the Excel users can still use Excel to look at the information. The only difference is that BI or data warehouse will be the data source of their Excel workbook.

    Top-Down Approach

    • An Excel policy should be created at the enterprise level to outline which Excel use cases are allowed, and which are not.
    • Excel use cases that involve extracting data from source systems and transforming that data using undisclosed business rules should be banned.
    • Excel should be a tool for manipulating, filtering, and presenting data, not a tool for extracting data and running business rules.

    Excel

    Bottom-Up Approach

    • Show empathy to your users. They just want information to get their work done.
    • A sub-optimal information landscape is the root cause, and they are the victims. Excel spreadmarts are the by-products.
    • Make the Excel users aware of the risks associated with Excel, train them in BI, and provide them with better information in the BI platform.

    Activity: Create an Excel governance policy

    3.2.1

    4 hours

    Construct a policy around Excel use to ensure that Excel documents are created and shared in a manner that does not compromise the integrity of your overall BI program.

    1. Review the information artifact list harvested from Step 2.1 and identify all existing Excel-related use cases.
    2. Categorize the Excel use cases into “allowed,” “not allowed,” and “not sure.” For each category define:
    3. Category To Do: Policy Context
      Allowed Discuss what makes these use cases ideal for BI. Document use cases, scenarios, examples, and reasons that allow Excel as an information artifact.
      Not Allowed Discuss why these cases should be avoided. Document forbidden use cases, scenarios, examples, and reasons that use Excel to generate information artifacts.
      Not Sure Discuss the confusions; clarify the gray area. Document clarifications and advise how end users can get help in those “gray area” cases.
    4. Document the findings in the BI Strategy and Roadmap Template in the Manage and Sustain BI Strategy section, or a proprietary template. You may also need to create a separate Excel policy to communicate the Dos and Don’ts.

    Inputs

    • Step 2.1 – A list of information artifacts

    Output

    • Excel-for-BI Use Policy

    Materials

    • BI Strategy Roadmap and Template, or proprietary document

    Participants

    • Business executives
    • CIO
    • Head of BI
    • BI team

    Build a network of ambassadors to promote BI and report to IT with end-user feedback and requests

    The Building of an Insider Network: The BI Ambassador Network

    BI ambassadors are influential individuals in the organization that may be proficient at using BI tools but are passionate about analytics. The network of ambassadors will be IT’s eyes, ears, and even mouth on the frontline with users. Ambassadors will promote BI, communicate any messages IT may have, and keep tabs on user satisfaction.

    Ideal candidate:

    • A good relationship with IT.
    • A large breadth of experience with BI, not just one dashboard.
    • Approachable and well-respected amongst peers.
    • Has a passion for driving organizational change using BI and continually looking for opportunities to innovate.

    Push

    • Key BI Messages
    • Best Practices
    • Training Materials

    Pull

    • Feedback
    • Complaints
    • Thoughts and New Ideas

    Motivate BI ambassadors with perks

    You need to motivate ambassadors to take on this additional responsibility. Make sure the BI ambassadors are recognized in their business units when they go above and beyond in promoting BI.

    Reward Approach Reward Type Description
    Privileges High Priority Requests Given their high usage and high visibility, ambassadors’ BI information requests should be given a higher priority.
    First Look at New BI Development Share the latest BI updates with ambassadors before introducing them to the organization. Ambassadors may even be excited to test out new functionality.
    Recognition Featured in Communications BI ambassadors’ use cases and testimonials can be featured in BI communications. Be sure to create a formal announcement introducing the ambassadors to the organization.
    BI Ambassador Certificate A certificate is a formal way to recognize their efforts. They can also publicly display the certificate in their workspace.
    Rewards Appointed by Senior Executives Have the initial request to be a BI ambassador come from a senior executive to flatter the ambassador and position the role as a reward or an opportunity for success.
    BI Ambassador Awards Award an outstanding BI ambassador for the year. The award should be given by the CEO in a major corporate event.

    Activity: Plan for a BI ambassador network

    3.2.2

    2 hours

    Identify individuals within your organization to act as ambassadors for BI and a bridge between IT and business users.

    1. Obtain a copy of your latest organizational chart. Review your most up-to-date organizational chart and identify key BI consumers across a variety of functional units. In selecting potential BI ambassadors, reflect on the following questions:
    • Does this individual have a good relationship with IT?
    • What is the depth of their experience with developing/consuming business intelligence?
    • Is this individual respected and influential amongst their respective business units?
    • Has this individual shown a passion for innovating within their role?
  • Create a mandate and collateral detailing the roles and responsibilities for the ambassador role, e.g.:
    • Promote BI to members of your group
    • Represent the “voice of the data consumers”
  • Approach the ambassador candidates and explain the responsibilities and perks of the role, with the goal of enlisting about 10-15 ambassadors
  • Inputs

    • An updated organizational chart
    • A list of BI users

    Output

    • Draft framework for BI ambassador network

    Materials

    • BI Strategy and Roadmap Template or proprietary document

    Participants

    • Business executives
    • CIO
    • Head of BI
    • BI team

    Keeping tabs on metadata is essential to creating a data democracy with BI

    A next generation BI not only provides a platform that mirrors business requirements, but also creates a flexible environment that empowers business users to explore data assets without having to go back and forth with IT to complete queries.

    Business users are generally not interested in the underlying architecture or the exact data lineages; they want access to the data that matters most for decision-making purposes.

    Metadata is data about data

    It comes in the form of structural metadata (information about the spaces that contain data) and descriptive metadata (information pertaining to the data elements themselves), in order to answer questions such as:

    • What is the intended purpose of this data?
    • How up-to-date is this information?
    • Who owns this data?
    • Where is this data coming from?
    • How have these data elements been transformed?

    By creating effective metadata, business users are able to make connections between and bring together data sources from multiple areas, creating the opportunity for holistic insight generation.

    Like BI, metadata lies in the Information Dimension layer of our data management framework.

    The metadata needs to be understood before building anything. You need to identify fundamentals of the data, who owns not only that data, but also its metadata. You need to understand where the consolidation is happening and who owns it. Metadata is the core driver and cost saver for building warehouses and requirements gathering.

    – Albert Hui, Principal, Data Economist

    Deliver timely, high quality, and affordable information to enable fast and effective business decisions

    In order to maximize your ROI on business intelligence, it needs to be treated less like a one-time endeavor and more like a practice to be continually improved upon.

    Though the BI strategy provides the overall direction, the BI operating model – which encompasses organization structure, processes, people, and application functionality – is the primary determinant of efficacy with respect to information delivery. The alterations made to the operating model occur in the short term to improve the final deliverables for business users.

    An optimal BI operating model satisfies three core requirements:

    Timeliness

    Effectiveness

  • Affordability
  • Bring tangible benefits of your revamped BI strategy to business users by critically assessing how your organization delivers business intelligence and identifying opportunities for increased operational efficiency.

    Assess and Optimize BI Operations

    Focus on delivering timely, quality, and affordable information to enable fast and effective business decisions

    Implement a fit-for-purpose BI and analytics solution to augment your next generation BI strategy

    Organizations new to business intelligence or with immature BI capabilities are under the impression that simply getting the latest-and-greatest tool will provide the insights business users are looking for.

    BI technology can only be as effective as the processes surrounding it and the people leveraging it. Organizations need to take the time to select and implement a BI suite that aligns with business goals and fosters end-user adoption.

    As an increasing number of companies turn to business intelligence technology, vendors are responding by providing BI and analytics platforms with more and more features.

    Our vendor landscape will simplify the process of selecting a BI and analytics solution by:

    Differentiating between the platforms and features vendors are offering.

    Detailing a robust framework for requirements gathering to pinpoint your organization’s needs.

    Developing a high-level plan for implementation.

    Select and Implement a Business Intelligence and Analytics Solution

    Find the diamond in your data-rough using the right BI & Analytics solution

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-tech analysts with your team:

    3.1.1-3.1.3

    Construct a BI improvement initiative roadmap

    During these activities, your team will consolidate the list of BI initiatives generated from the assessments conducted in previous phases, assign timelines to each action, prioritize them using a value–effort matrix, and finally produce a roadmap for implementing your organization’s BI improvement strategy.

    3.2

    Identify continuous improvement opportunities for BI

    Our analyst team will work with your organization to ideate supplementary programs to support your BI strategy. Defining Excel use cases that are permitted and prohibited in conjunction with your BI strategy, as well as structuring an internal BI ambassador network, are a few extra initiatives that can enhance your BI improvement plans.

    Insight breakdown

    Your BI platform is not a one-and-done initiative.

    A BI program is not a static project that is created once and remains unchanged. Your strategy must be treated as a living platform to be revisited and revitalized in order to provide effective enablement of business decision making. Develop a BI strategy that propels your organization by building it on business goals and objectives, as well as comprehensive assessments that quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate your current BI capabilities.

    Put the “B” back in “BI.”

    The closer you align your new BI platform to real business interests, the stronger will be the buy-in, realized value, and groundswell of enthusiastic adoption. Ultimately, getting this phase right sets the stage to best realize a strong ROI for your investment in the people, processes, and technology that will be your next generation BI platform.

    Go beyond the platform.

    BI success is not based solely on the technology it runs on; technology cannot mask gaps in capabilities. You must be capable in your environment – data management, data quality, and related data practices must be strong, otherwise the usefulness of the intelligence suffers. The best BI solution does not only provide a technology platform, but also addresses the elements that surround the platform. Look beyond tools and holistically assess the maturity of your BI practice with input from both the BI consumer and provider perspectives.

    Appendix

    Detailed list of BI Types

    Style Description Strategic Importance (1-5) Popularity (1-5) Effort (1-5)
    Standards Preformatted reports Standard, preformatted information for backward-looking analysis. 5 5 1
    User-defined analyses Pre-staged information where “pick lists” enable business users to filter (select) the information they wish to analyze, such as sales for a selected region during a selected previous timeframe. 5 4 2
    Ad-hoc analyses Power users write their own queries to extract self-selected pre-staged information and then use the information to perform a user-created analysis. 5 4 3
    Scorecards and dashboards Predefined business performance metrics about performance variables that are important to the organization, presented in a tabular or graphical format that enables business users to see at a glance how the organization is performing. 4 4 3
    Multidimensional analysis (OLAP) Multidimensional analysis (also known as On-line analytical processing): Flexible tool-based user-defined analysis of business performance and the underlying drivers or root causes of that performance. 4 3 3
    Alerts Predefined analyses of key business performance variables, comparison to a performance standard or range, and communication to designated businesspeople when performance is outside the predefined performance standard or range. 4 3 3
    Advanced Analytics Application of long-established statistical and/or operations research methods to historical business information to look backward and characterize a relevant aspect of business performance, typically by using descriptive statistics 5 3 4
    Predictive Analytics Application of long-established statistical and/or operations research methods to historical business information to predict, model, or simulate future business and/or economic performance and potentially prescribe a favored course of action for the future 5 3 5

    Our BI strategy approach follows Info-Tech’s popular IT Strategy Framework

    A comprehensive BI strategy needs to be developed under the umbrella of an overall IT strategy. Specifically, creating a BI strategy is contributing to helping IT mature from a firefighter to a strategic partner that has close ties with business units.

    1. Determine mandate and scope 2. Assess drivers and constraints 3. Evaluate current state of IT 4. Develop a target state vision 5. Analyze gaps and define initiatives 6. Build a roadmap 8. Revamp 7. Execute
    Mandate Business drivers Holistic assessments Vision and mission Initiatives Business-driven priorities
    Scope External drivers Focus-area specific assessments Guiding principles Risks
    Project charter Opportunities to innovate Target state vision Execution schedule
    Implications Objectives and measures

    This BI strategy blueprint is rooted in our road-tested and proven IT strategy framework as a systematic method of tackling strategy development.

    Research contributors

    Internal Contributors

    • Andy Woyzbun, Executive Advisor
    • Natalia Nygren Modjeska, Director, Data & Analytics
    • Crystal Singh, Director, Data & Analytic
    • Andrea Malick, Director, Data & Analytics
    • Raj Parab, Director, Data & Analytics
    • Igor Ikonnikov, Director, Data & Analytics
    • Andy Neill, Practice Lead, Data & Analytics
    • Rob Anderson, Manager Sales Operations
    • Shari Lava, Associate Vice-President, Vendor Advisory Practice

    External Contributors

    • Albert Hui, Principal, DataEconomist
    • Cameran Hetrick, Senior Director of Data Science & Analytics, thredUP
    • David Farrar, Director – Marketing Planning & Operations, Ricoh Canada Inc
    • Emilie Harrington, Manager of Analytics Operations Development, Lowe’s
    • Sharon Blanton, VP and CIO, The College of New Jersey
    • Raul Vomisescu, Independent Consultant

    Research contributors and experts

    Albert Hui

    Consultant, Data Economist

    Albert Hui is a cofounder of Data Economist, a data-consulting firm based in Toronto, Canada. His current assignment is to redesign Scotiabank’s Asset Liability Management for its Basel III liquidity compliance using Big Data technology. Passionate about technology and problem solving, Albert is an entrepreneur and result-oriented IT technology leader with 18 years of experience in consulting and software industry. His area of focus is on data management, specializing in Big Data, business intelligence, and data warehousing. Beside his day job, he also contributes to the IT community by writing blogs and whitepapers, book editing, and speaking at technology conferences. His recent research and speaking engagement is on machine learning on Big Data.

    Albert holds an MBA from the University of Toronto and a master’s degree in Industrial Engineering. He has twin boys and enjoys camping and cycling with them in his spare time.

    Albert Hui Consultant, Data Economist

    Cameran Hetrick

    Senior Director of Analytics and Data Science, thredUP

    Cameran is the Senior Director of Analytics and Data Science at thredUP, a startup inspiring a new generation to think second hand first. There she helps drives top line growth through advanced and predictive analytics. Previously, she served as the Director of Data Science at VMware where she built and led the data team for End User Computing. Before moving to the tech industry, she spent five years at The Disneyland Resort setting ticket and hotel prices and building models to forecast attendance. Cameran holds an undergraduate degree in Economics/Mathematics from UC Santa Barbara and graduated with honors from UC Irvine's MBA program.

    Cameran Hetrick Senior Director of Analytics and Data Science, thredUP

    Bibliography

    Bange, Carsten and Wayne Eckerson. “BI and Data Management in the Cloud: Issues and Trends.” BARC and Eckerson Group, January 2017. Web.

    Business Intelligence: The Strategy Imperative for CIOs. Tech. Information Builders. 2007. Web. 1 Dec. 2015.

    COBIT 5: Enabling Information. Rolling Meadows, IL: ISACA, 2013. Web.

    Dag, Naslund, Emma Sikander, and Sofia Oberg. "Business Intelligence - a Maturity Model Covering Common Challenges." Lund University Publications. Lund University, 2014. Web. 23 Oct. 2015.

    “DAMA Guide to the Data Management Body of Knowledge (DAMA-DMBOK Guide).” First Edition. DAMA International. 2009. Digital. April 2014.

    Davenport, Thomas H. and Bean, Randy. “Big Data and AI Executive Survey 2019.” NewVantage Partners LLC. 2019. Web.

    "Debunking the Business of Analytics." Experian Data Quality. Sept. 2013. Web.

    Bibliography

    Drouin, Sue. "Value Chain." SAP Analytics. February 27, 2015.

    Farrar, David. “BI & Data analytics workshop feedback.” Ricoh Canada. Sept. 2019.

    Fletcher, Heather. "New England Patriots Use Analytics & Trigger Emails to Retain Season Ticket Holders." Target Marketing. 1 Dec. 2011. Web.

    Gonçalves, Alex. "Social Media Analytics Strategy - Using Data to Optimize Business Performance.” Apress. 2017.

    Imhoff, Claudia, and Colin White. "Self Service Business Intelligence: Empowering Users to Generate Insights." SAS Resource Page. The Data Warehouse Institute, 2011. Web.

    Khamassi, Ahmed. "Building An Analytical Roadmap : A Real Life Example." Wipro. 2014.

    Kuntz, Jerry, Pierre Haren, and Rebecca Shockley. IBM Insight 2015 Teleconference Series. Proc. of Analytics: The Upside of Disruption. IBM Institute for Business Value, 19 Oct. 2015. Web.

    Kwan, Anne , Maximillian Schroeck, Jon Kawamura. “Architecting and operating model, A platform for accelerating digital transformation.” Part of a Deliotte Series on Digital Industrial Transformation, 2019. Web.

    Bibliography

    Lebied, Mona. "11 Steps on Your BI Roadmap To Implement A Successful Business Intelligence Strategy." Business Intelligence. July 20, 2018. Web.

    Light, Rob. “Make Business Intelligence a Necessity: How to Drive User Adoption.” Sisense Blog. 30 July 2018.

    Mazenko, Elizabeth. “Avoid the Pitfalls: 3 Reasons 80% of BI Projects Fail.” BetterBuys. October 2015.

    Marr, Bernard. "Why Every Business Needs A Data And Analytics Strategy.” Bernard Marr & Co. 2019.

    Mohr, Niko and Hürtgen, Holger. “Achieving Business Impact with Data.” McKinsey. April 2018.

    MIT Sloan Management

    Quinn, Kevin R. "Worst Practices in Business Intelligence: Why BI Applications Succeed Where BI Tools Fail." (2007): 1-19. BeyeNetwork. Information Builders, 2007. Web. 1 Dec. 2015.

    Ringdal, Kristen. "Learning multilevel Analysis." European social Survey. 2019.

    Bibliography

    Schaefer, Dave, Ajay Chandramouly, Burt Carmak, and Kireeti Kesavamurthy. "Delivering Self-Service BI, Data Visualization, and Big Data Analytics." IT@Intel White Paper (2013): 1-11. June 2013. Web. 30 Nov. 2015.

    Schultz, Yogi. “About.” Corvelle Consulting. 2019.

    "The Current State of Analytics: Where Do We Go From Here?" SAS Resource Page. SAS & Bloomberg Businessweek, 2011. Web.

    "The Four Steps to Defining a Customer Analytics Strategy." CCG Analytics Solutions & Services. Nov 10,2017.

    Traore, Moulaye. "Without a strategic plan, your analytics initiatives are risky." Advisor. March 12, 2018. web.

    Wells, Dave. "Ten Mistakes to Avoid When Gathering BI Requirements." Engineering for Industry. The Data Warehouse Institute, 2008. Web.

    “What is a Business Intelligence Strategy and do you need one?” Hydra. Sept 2019. Web.

    Williams, Steve. “Business Intelligence Strategy and Big Data Analytics.” Morgan Kaufman. 2016.

    Wolpe, Toby. "Case Study: How One Firm Used BI Analytics to Track Staff Performance | ZDNet." ZDNet. 3 May 2013. Web.

    Yuk, Mico. “11 Reasons Why Most Business Intelligence Projects Fail.” Innovative enterprise Channels. May 2019.

    Manage End-User Devices

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}307|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $45,499 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 10 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: End-User Computing Devices
    • Parent Category Link: /end-user-computing-devices
    • Desktop and mobile device management teams use separate tools and different processes.
    • People at all levels of IT are involved in device management.
    • Vendors are pushing unified endpoint management (UEM) products, and teams struggling with device management are hoping that UEM is their savior.
    • The number and variety of devices will only increase with the continued advance of mobility and emergence of the Internet of Things (IoT).

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Many problems can be solved by fixing roles, responsibilities, and process. Standardize so you can optimize.
    • UEM is not a silver bullet. Your current solution can image computers in less than 4 hours if you use lean images.
    • Done with, not done to. Getting input from the business will improve adoption, avoid frustration, and save everyone time.

    Impact and Result

    • Define the benefits that you want to achieve and optimize based on those benefits.
    • Take an evolutionary, rather than revolutionary, approach to merging end-user support teams. Process and tool unity comes first.
    • Define the roles and responsibilities involved in end-user device management, and create a training plan to ensure everyone can execute their responsibilities.
    • Stop using device management practices from the era of Windows XP. Create a plan for lean images and app packages.

    Manage End-User Devices Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should optimize end-user device management, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Identify the business and IT benefits of optimizing endpoint management

    Get your desktop and mobile device support teams out of firefighting mode by identifying the real problem.

    • Manage End-User Devices – Phase 1: Identify the Business and IT Benefits
    • End-User Device Management Standard Operating Procedure
    • End-User Device Management Executive Presentation

    2. Improve supporting teams and processes

    Improve the day-to-day operations of your desktop and mobile device support teams through role definition, training, and process standardization.

    • Manage End-User Devices – Phase 2: Improve Supporting Teams and Processes
    • End-User Device Management Workflow Library (Visio)
    • End-User Device Management Workflow Library (PDF)

    3. Improve supporting technologies

    Stop using management tools and techniques from the Windows XP era. Save yourself, and your technicians, from needless pain.

    • Manage End-User Devices – Phase 3: Improve Supporting Technologies
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Manage End-User Devices

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Identify the Business and IT Benefits of Optimizing End-User Device Management

    The Purpose

    Identify how unified endpoint management (UEM) can improve the lives of the end user and of IT.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Cutting through the vendor hype and aligning with business needs.

    Activities

    1.1 Identify benefits you can provide to stakeholders.

    1.2 Identify business and IT goals in order to prioritize benefits.

    1.3 Identify how to achieve benefits.

    1.4 Define goals based on desired benefits.

    Outputs

    Executive presentation

    2 Improve the Teams and Processes That Support End-User Device Management

    The Purpose

    Ensure that your teams have a consistent approach to end-user device management.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Developed a standard approach to roles and responsibilities, to training, and to device management processes.

    Activities

    2.1 Align roles to your environment.

    2.2 Assign architect-, engineer-, and administrator-level responsibilities.

    2.3 Rationalize your responsibility matrix.

    2.4 Ensure you have the necessary skills.

    2.5 Define Tier 2 processes, including patch deployment, emergency patch deployment, device deployment, app deployment, and app packaging.

    Outputs

    List of roles involved in end-user device management

    Responsibility matrix for end-user device management

    End-user device management training plan

    End-user device management standard operating procedure

    Workflows and checklists of end-user device management processes

    3 Improve the Technologies That Support End-User Device Management

    The Purpose

    Modernize the toolset used by IT to manage end-user devices.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Saving time and resources for many standard device management processes.

    Activities

    3.1 Define the core image for each device/OS.

    3.2 Define app packages.

    3.3 Gather action items for improving the support technologies.

    3.4 Create a roadmap for improving end-user device management.

    3.5 Create a communication plan for improving end-user device management.

    Outputs

    Core image outline

    Application package outline

    End-user device management roadmap

    End-user device management communication plan

    pricing

    • TymansGroupVideosExcerpt: BasicFor freelancers$19/ month 10 presentations/monthSupport at $25/hour1 campaign/month Choose plan StandardFor medium sized teams$29/ month 50 presentations/month5 hours of free support10 campaigns/month Choose plan EnterpriseFor large companies$79/ month Unlimited presentationsUnlimited supportUnlimited campaigns Choose plan

    Pricing

    We price our services transparantly. To know our prices, please submit your contact details below.

    You can work with TY in a different ways, according to your needs.

    • Topic consulting without any long-term contract. You decide how many hours of advice you want. It's pay-as-you-go. Great for short sessions, but more expensive as time ticks on. Billing is done at the start of the agreement. Click here to book your appointment
    • Analysis and recommendation — this is a scope-defined body of work whereby TY undertakes an As-Is analysis and presents recommendations.
    • Total time contract — this is usually the most financially beneficial to clients needing irregular, and far from full-time advice, without a time-frame. Essentially you buy a block of time in advance. If it takes you 3 years to use it up, be our guest. We work on your requests, but within the availability of the moment. Billing is done at the start of the contract.
    • Retained priority — here, we reserve an agreed body of work (typically time) within a one-year timeframe. You call, we jump. Reaction time is a matter of hours. At the end of the period, unused time can be transferred once to the following year. Contracts are typically renewed at the end of each year. Billing can be done on a monthly basis or at the start of the agreement/year. The price/billing has 2 components: the availability premium and the actual work time. For clients needing irregular, but ongoing and varied help, this is a great place to start.
    • Full-time consulting — Here you have our undivided attention, with a minimum of 250 8-hour work days in a single calendar-year. Billing is done on a monthly basis. Overtime is available, and billed separately. Within your business hours, you take priority over any other contracts.

    Continue reading

    AI Governance

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}206|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $389 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 3 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Business Intelligence Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /business-intelligence-strategy
    • The use of AI and machine learning (ML) has gained momentum as organizations evaluate the potential applications of AI to enhance the customer experience, improve operational efficiencies, and automate business processes.
    • Growing applications of AI have reinforced concerns about ethical, fair, and responsible use of the technology that assists or replaces human decision making.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Implementing AI systems requires careful management of the AI lifecycle, governing data, and machine learning model to prevent unintentional outcomes not only to an organization’s brand reputation but, more importantly, to workers, individuals, and society.
    • When adopting AI, it is important to have a strong ethical and risk management framework surrounding its use.

    Impact and Result

    • AI governance enables management, monitoring, and control of all AI activities within an organization.

    AI Governance Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. AI Governance Deck – A framework for building responsible, ethical, fair, and transparent AI.

    Create the foundation that enables management, monitoring, and control of all AI activities within the organization. The AI governance framework will allow you to define an AI risk management approach and defines methodology for managing and monitoring the AI/ML models in production.

    • AI Governance Storyboard
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    AI Governance

    A Framework for Building Responsible, Ethical, Fair, and Transparent AI

    Are you ready for AI?

    Business leaders must manage the associated risks as they scale their use of AI

    In recent years, following technological breakthroughs and advances in development of machine learning (ML) models and management of large volumes of data, organizations are scaling their use of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies.

    The use of AI and ML has gained momentum as organizations evaluate the potential applications of AI to enhance the customer experience, improve operational efficiencies, and automate business processes.

    Growing applications of AI have reinforced concerns about ethical, fair, and responsible use of the technology that assists or replaces human decision-making.

    Implementing AI systems requires careful management of the AI lifecycle, governing data, and machine learning model to prevent unintentional outcomes not only to an organization’s brand reputation but also, more importantly, to workers, individuals, and society. When adopting AI, it is important to have strong ethical and risk management frameworks surrounding its use.

    “Responsible AI is the practice of designing, building and deploying AI in a manner that empowers people and businesses, and fairly impacts customers and society – allowing companies to engender trust and scale AI with confidence.” (World Economic Forum)

    Regulations and risk assessment tools

    Governments around the world are developing AI assessment methodologies and legislation for AI. Here are a couple of examples:

    • Responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI) guiding principles (Canada):
      1. understand and measure the impact of using AI by developing and sharing tools and approaches
      2. be transparent about how and when we are using AI, starting with a clear user need and public benefit
      3. provide meaningful explanations about AI decision-making, while also offering opportunities to review results and challenge these decisions
      4. be as open as we can by sharing source code, training data, and other relevant information, all while protecting personal information, system integration, and national security and defense
      5. provide sufficient training so that government employees developing and using AI solutions have the responsible design, function, and implementation skills needed to make AI-based public services better
    • The Algorithmic Impact Assessment tool (Canada) is used to determine the impact level of an automated decision-system. It defines 48 risk and 33 mitigation questions. Assessment scores consider factors such as systems design, algorithm, decision type, impact, and data.
    • The National AI Initiative Act of 2020 (DIVISION E, SEC. 5001) (US) became law on January 1, 2021. This is a program across the entire Federal government to accelerate AI research and application.
    • Bill C-27, Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA) (Canada), when passed, would be the first law in Canada regulating the use of artificial intelligence systems.
    • The EU Artificial Intelligence Act (EU) assigns applications of AI to three risk categories: applications and systems that create an unacceptable risk, such as government-run social scoring; high-risk applications, such as a CV-scanning tool that ranks job applicants; and lastly, applications not explicitly listed as high-risk.
    • The FEAT Principles Assessment Methodology was created by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) in collaboration with other 27 industry partners for financial institutions to promote fairness, ethics, accountability, and transparency (FEAT) in the use of artificial intelligence and data analytics (AIDA).

    AI policies around the world

    Map of AI policies around the world, marked by circles of varying color and size. The legend on the right indicates '# of AI Policies (2019-2021)' by color.
    Source of data: OECD.AI (2021), powered by EC/OECD (2021), database of national AI policies, accessed on 7/09/2022, https://oecd.ai.

    The need for AI governance

    “To adopt AI, organizations will need to review and enhance their processes and governance frameworks to address new and evolving risks.” (Canadian RegTech Association, Safeguarding AI Use Through Human-Centric Design, 2020)

    To ensure responsible, transparent, and ethical AI systems, organizations will need to review existing risk control frameworks and update them to include AI risk management and impact assessment frameworks and processes.

    As ML and AI technologies are constantly evolving, the AI governance and AI risk management frameworks will need to evolve to ensure the appropriate safeguards and controls are in place.

    This applies not only to the machine learning models and AI system custom built by the organization’s data science and AI team, but it also includes AI-powered vendor tools and technologies. The vendors should be able to explain how AI is used in their products, how the model was trained, and what data was used to train the model.

    AI governance enables management, monitoring, and control of all AI activities within an organization.

    Stock image of a chip o a circuitboard labelled 'AI'.

    Key concepts

    Info-Tech Research Group defines the key terms used in this document as follows:

    Machine learning systems learn from experience and without explicit instructions. They learn patterns from data, then analyze and make predictions based on past behavior and the patterns learned.

    Artificial intelligence is a combination of technologies and can include machine learning. AI systems perform tasks that mimic human intelligence, such as learning from experience and problem solving. Most importantly, AI makes its own decisions without human intervention.

    We use the definition of data ethics by Open Data Institute: “Data ethics is a branch of ethics that considers the impact of data practices on people, society and the environment. The purpose of data ethics is to guide the values and conduct of data practitioners in data collection, sharing and use.”

    Algorithmic or machine bias is systematic and repeatable errors in a computer system that create unfair outcomes, such as privileging one arbitrary group of users over others. Algorithmic bias is not a technical problem. It’s a social and political problem, and in the context of implementing AI for business benefits, it’s a business problem.

    Download the blueprint Mitigate Machine Bias blueprint for detailed discussion on bias, fairness, and transparency in AI systems

    Key concepts – explainable, transparent and trustworthy

    Responsible AI is the practice of designing, building and deploying AI in a manner that empowers people and businesses and fairly impacts customers and society – allowing companies to engender trust and scale AI with confidence” (CIFAR).

    The AI system is considered trustworthy when people understand how the technology works and when we can assess that it’s safe and reliable. We must be able to trust the output of the system and understand how the system was designed, what data was used to train it, and how it was implemented.

    Explainable AI, sometimes abbreviated as XAI, refers to the ability to explain how an AI model makes predictions, its anticipated impact, and its potential biases.

    Transparency means communicating with and empowering users by sharing information internally and with external stakeholders, including beneficiaries and people impacted by the AI-powered product or service.

    68% [of Canadians] are concerned they don’t understand the technology well enough to know the risks.

    77% say they are concerned about the risks AI poses to society (TD, 2019)

    AI Governance Framework

    Monitoring
    Monitoring compliance and risk of AI/ML systems/models in production

    Tools & Technologies
    Tools and technologies to support AI governance framework implementation

    Model Governance
    Ensures accountability and traceability for AI/ML models

    AI Governance Framework with the surrounding 7 headlines and an adjective between each pair: 'Accountable', 'Trustworthy', 'Responsible', 'Ethical', 'Fair', 'Explainable', 'Transparent'. Organization
    Structure, roles, and responsibilities of the AI governance organization

    Operating Model
    How AI governance operates and works with other organizational structures to deliver value

    Risk and Compliance
    Alignment with corporate risk management and ensuring compliance with regulations and assessment frameworks

    Policies/Procedures/ Standards
    Policies and procedures to support implementation of AI governance

    Build a Digital Workspace Strategy

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}294|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $12,399 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 10 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: End-User Computing Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /end-user-computing-strategy
    • IT must figure out what a digital workspace is, why they’re building one, and what type they want.
    • Remote work creates challenges that cannot be solved by technology alone.
    • Focusing solely on technology risks building something the business doesn’t want or can’t use.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Building a smaller digital workspace doesn’t mean that the workspace will have a smaller impact on the business.

    Impact and Result

    • Partner with the business to create a team of digital workspace champions.
    • Empower employees with a tool that makes remote work easier.

    Build a Digital Workspace Strategy Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should partner with the business for building a digital workspace, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Identify the digital workspace you want to build

    Create a list of benefits that the organization will find compelling and build a cross-functional team to champion the workspace.

    • Build a Digital Workspace Strategy – Phase 1: Identify the Digital Workspace You Want to Build
    • Digital Workspace Strategy Template
    • Digital Workspace Executive Presentation Template

    2. Identify high-level requirements

    Design the digital workspace’s value proposition to drive your requirements.

    • Build a Digital Workspace Strategy – Phase 2: Identify High-Level Requirements
    • Sample Digital Workspace Value Proposition
    • Flexible Work Location Policy
    • Flexible Work Time Policy
    • Flexible Work Time Off Policy
    • Mobile Device Remote Wipe Waiver Template
    • Mobile Device Connectivity & Allowance Policy
    • General Security – User Acceptable Use Policy

    3. Identify initiatives and a high-level roadmap

    Take an agile approach to building your digital workspace.

    • Build a Digital Workspace Strategy – Phase 3: Identify Initiatives and a High-Level Roadmap
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Build a Digital Workspace Strategy

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Identify the Digital Workspace You Want to Build

    The Purpose

    Ensure that the digital workspace addresses real problems the business is facing.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Defined benefits that will address business problems

    Identified strategic business partners

    Activities

    1.1 Identify the digital workspace’s direction.

    1.2 Prioritize benefits and define a vision.

    1.3 Assemble a team of digital workspace champions.

    Outputs

    Vision statement

    Mission statement

    Guiding principles

    Prioritized business benefits

    Metrics and key performance indicators

    Service Owner, Business Owner, and Project Sponsor role definitions

    Project roles and responsibilities

    Operational roles and responsibilities

    2 Identify Business Requirements

    The Purpose

    Drive requirements through a well-designed value proposition.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Identified requirements that are based in employees’ needs

    Activities

    2.1 Design the value proposition.

    2.2 Identify required policies.

    2.3 Identify required level of input from users and business units.

    2.4 Document requirements for user experiences, processes, and services.

    2.5 Identify in-scope training and culture requirements.

    Outputs

    Prioritized functionality requirements

    Value proposition for three business roles

    Value proposition for two service provider roles

    Policy requirements

    Interview and focus group plan

    Business process requirements

    Training and culture initiatives

    3 Identify IT and Service Provider Requirements

    The Purpose

    Ensure that technology is an enabler.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Documented requirements for IT and service provider technology

    Activities

    3.1 Identify systems of record requirements.

    3.2 Identify requirements for apps.

    3.3 Identify information storage requirements.

    3.4 Identify management and security integrations.

    3.5 Identify requirements for internal and external partners.

    Outputs

    Requirements for systems for record

    Prioritized list of apps

    Storage system requirements

    Data and security requirements

    Outsourcing requirements

    Agile Readiness Assessment Survey

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}160|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Development
    • Parent Category Link: /development
    • Today’s realities are driving organizations to digitize faster and become more Agile.
    • Agile transformations are difficult and frequently fail for a variety of reasons.
    • To achieve the benefits of Agile, organizations need to be ready for the significant changes that Agile demands.
    • Challenges to your Agile transformation can come from a variety of sources.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Use Info-Tech’s CLAIM+G model to examine potential roadblocks to Agile on six different organizational dimensions.
    • Use survey results to identify and address the issues that are most likely to derail your Agile transformation.

    Impact and Result

    • Better understand where and how your organization needs to change to support your Agile transformation.
    • Focus your attention on your organization’s biggest roadblocks to Agile.
    • Improve your organization’s chances of a successful Agile transformation.

    Agile Readiness Assessment Survey Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Agile Readiness Assessment Deck – A guide to help your organization survey its Agile readiness.

    Read this deck to see how an Agile Readiness Assessment can help your organization understand its readiness for Agile transformation. The storyboard guides you through how to collect, consolidate, and examine survey responses and create an actionable list of improvements to make your organization more Agile ready.

    • Agile Readiness Assessment Storyboard

    2. Survey Templates (Excel or MS Forms, available in English and French) – Use these templates to create and distribute the survey broadly within your organization.

    The Agile Readiness Assessment template is available in either Excel or Microsoft Forms (both English and French versions are available). Download the Excel templates here or use the links in the above deck to access the online versions of the survey.

    • Agile Readiness Survey – English
    • Agile Readiness Survey – French

    3. Agile Readiness Assessment Consolidated Results Tool – Use this tool to consolidate and analyze survey responses.

    The Agile Readiness Assessment Consolidated Results Tool allows you to consolidate survey responses by team/role and produces your heatmap for analysis.

    • Agile Readiness Assessment Consolidated Results Tool
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Agile Readiness Assessment

    Understand how ready your organization is for an Agile transformation.

    Info-Tech Research Group Inc. is a global leader in providing IT research and advice. Info-Tech’s products and services combine actionable insight and relevant advice with ready-to-use tools and templates that cover the full spectrum of IT concerns.

    Analyst Perspective

    Use the wisdom of crowds to understand how ready you are for Agile transformation.

    Photo of Alex Ciraco, Principal Research Director, Application Delivery and Management, Info-Tech Research Group

    Agile transformations can be difficult and complex to implement. That’s because they require fundamental changes in the way an organization thinks and behaves (and many organizations are not ready for these changes).

    Use Info-Tech’s Agile Readiness Assessment to broadly survey the organization’s readiness for Agile along six dimensions:

    • Culture
    • Learning
    • Automation
    • Integrated teams
    • Metrics
    • Governance

    The survey results will help you to examine and address those areas that are most likely to hinder your move to Agile.

    Alex Ciraco
    Principal Research Director, Application Delivery and Management
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    • Your organization wants to shorten delivery time and improve quality by adopting Agile practices.
    • Your organization has not yet used Agile successfully.
    • You know that Agile transformations are complex and difficult to implement.
    • You want to maximize your Agile transformation’s chances of success.

    Common Obstacles

    • Risks to your Agile transformation can come from a variety of sources, including:
      • Organizational culture
      • Learning practices
      • Use of automation
      • Ability to create integrated teams
      • Use of metrics
      • Governance practices

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    • Use Info-Tech’s Agile Readiness Assessment to broadly survey your organization’s readiness for Agile.
    • Examine the consolidated results of this survey to identify challenges that are most likely to hinder Agile success.
    • Discuss and address these challenges to increase your chances of success.

    Info-Tech Insight

    By first understanding the numerous challenges to Agile transformations and then broadly surveying your organization to identify and address the challenges that are at play, you are more likely to have a successful Agile transformation.

    Info-Tech’s methodology

    1. Distribute Survey 2. Consolidate Survey Results 3. Examine Results and Problem Solve
    Phase Steps

    1.1 Identify the teams/roles you will survey.

    1.2 Configure the survey to reflect your teams/roles.

    1.3 Distribute the Agile Readiness Assessment Survey broadly in the organization.

    2.1 Collect survey responses from all participants.

    2.2 Consolidate the results using the template provided.

    3.1 Examine the consolidated results (both OVERALL and DETAILED Heatmaps)

    3.2 Identify key challenge areas (those which are most “red”) and discuss these challenges with participants

    3.3 Brainstorm, select and refine potential solutions to these challenges

    Phase Outcomes An appreciation for the numerous challenges associated with Agile transformations Identified challenges to Agile within your organization (both team-specific and organization-wide challenges) An actionable list of solutions/actions to address your organization’s Agile challenges.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals.

    Agile Readiness Assessment Survey

    Survey the organization to understand your readiness for an Agile transformation on six dimensions.

    Sample of the Agile Readiness Assessment Survey blueprint deliverable.

    Agile Readiness Assessment Consolidated Results

    Examine your readiness for Agile and identify team-specific and organization-wide challenges.

    Sample of the Agile Readiness Assessment Consolidated Results blueprint deliverable.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Guided Implementation

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is between 6 to 8 calls over the course of 1 to 2 months.

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

      Phase 1: Distribute Survey

    • Call #1: Scope requirements, objectives, and your specific challenges (identify potential participants).
    • Call #2: First call with participants (introduce Phase 1 and assign survey for completion).
    • Call #3: Gather survey responses (prep for Phase 2 calls).
    • Phase 2: Consolidate Survey Results

    • Call #4: Consolidate all survey responses using the template.
    • Call #5: Conduct initial review of consolidated results (prep for Phase 3 calls).
    • Phase 3: Examine Results and Problem Solve

    • Call #6: Present consolidated results to participants and agree on most pressing challenges.
    • Call #7: Brainstorm, identify, and refine potential solutions to most pressing challenges.
    • Call #8: Conduct closing and communication call.

    Phase 1 — Phase 1 of 3, 'Distribute Survey'.

    Customize and distribute the survey

    Decide which teams/roles will participate in the survey.

    Decide which format and language(s) you will use for your Agile Readiness Assessment Survey.

    Configure the survey templates to reflect your selected teams/roles.

    Distribute the survey for participants to complete.

    • 1.1 The Agile Readiness Assessment Survey will help you to identify both team-specific and organization-wide challenges to your Agile transformation. It is best to distribute the survey broadly across the organization and include several teams and roles. Identify and make note of the teams/roles that will be participating in the survey.
    • 1.2 Select which format of survey you will be using (Excel or online), along with the language(s) you will use (links to the survey templates can be found in the table below). Then configure the survey templates to reflect your list of teams/roles from Step 1.1.
    • Format Language Download Survey Template
      Excel English Agile Readiness Assessment Excel Survey Template – EN and FR
      Excel French
      Online English Agile Readiness Assessment Online Survey Template – EN
      Online French Agile Readiness Assessment Online Survey Template – FR

    • 1.3 Distribute your Agile Readiness Assessment Survey broadly in the organization. Give all participants a deadline date for completion of the survey.

    Phase 2 — Phase 2 of 3, 'Consolidate Results'.

    Consolidate Survey Results

    Collect and consolidate all survey responses using the template provided.

    Review the OVERALL and DETAILED Heatmaps generated by the template.

    • 2.1 Collect the survey responses from all participants. All responses completed using the online form will be anonymous (for responses returned using the Excel form, assign each a unique identifier so that anonymity of responses is maintained).
    • 2.2 Consolidate the survey responses using the template below. Follow the instructions in the template to incorporate all survey responses.
    • Download the Agile Readiness Assessment Consolidated Results Tool

      Sample of the Agile Readiness Assessment Consolidated Results Tool, ranking maturity scores in 'Culture', 'Learning', 'Automation', 'Integrated Teams', 'Metrics', and 'Governance'.

    Phase 3 — Phase 3 of 3, 'Examine Results'.

    Examine Survey Results and Problem Solve

    Review the consolidated survey results as a team.

    Identify the challenges that need the most attention.

    Brainstorm potential solutions. Decide which are most promising and create a plan to implement them.

    • 3.1 Examine the consolidated results (both OVERALL and DETAILED Heatmaps) and look at both team-specific and organization-wide challenge areas.
    • 3.2 Identify which challenge areas need the most attention (typically those that are most red in the heatmap) and discuss these challenges with survey participants.
    • 3.3 As a team, brainstorm potential solutions to these challenges. Select from and refine the solutions that are most promising, then create a plan to implement them.

    3.1 Exercise: Collaborative Problem Solving — Phase 3 of 3, 'Examine Results'.

    60 Mins

    Input: Consolidated survey results

    Output: List of actions to address your most pressing challenges along with a timeline to implement them

    Materials: Agile Readiness Assessment Consolidated Results Tool, Whiteboard and markers

    Participants: Survey participants, Other interested parties

    This exercise will create a plan for addressing your most pressing Agile-related challenges.

    • As a team, agree on which survey challenges are most important to address (typically the most red in the heatmap).
    • Brainstorm potential solutions/actions to address these challenges.
    • Assign solutions/actions to individuals and set a timeline for completion.
    Challenge Proposed Solution Owner Timeline
    Enrichment
    lack of a CoE
    Establish a service-oriented Agile Center of Excellence (CoE) staffed with experienced Agile practitioners who can directly help new-to-Agile teams be successful. Bill W. 6 Months
    Tool Chain
    (lack of Agile tools)
    Select a standard Agile work management tool (e.g. Jira, Rally, ADO) that will be used by all Agile teams. Cindy K. 2 Months

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Sample of an Info-Tech blueprint. Modernize Your SDLC
    • Strategically adopt today’s SDLC good practices to streamline value delivery.
    Sample of an Info-Tech blueprint. Implement Agile Practices That Work
    • Guide your organization through its Agile transformation journey.
    Sample of an Info-Tech blueprint. Implement DevOps Practices That Work
    • Streamline business value delivery through the strategic adoption of DevOps practices.
    Sample of an Info-Tech blueprint. Mentoring for Agile Teams
    • Leverage an experience Agile Mentor to give your in-flight Agile project a helping hand.

    Research Contributors and Experts

    • Columbus Brown, Senior Principal – Practice Lead – Business Alignment, Daugherty Business Solutions
    • Saeed Khan, Founder, Transformation Labs
    • Brenda Peshak, Product Owner/Scrum Master/Program Manager, John Deere/Source Allies/Widget Industries LLC
    • Vincent Mirabelli, Principal, Global Project Synergy Group
    • Len O'Neill, Sr. Vice President and Chief Information Officer, The Suddath Companies
    • Shameka A. Jones, MPM, CSM, Lead Business Management Consultant, Mainspring Business Group, LLC
    • Ryland Leyton, Lead Business Analyst, Aptos Retail
    • Ashish Nangia, Lead Business System Analyst, Ashley Furniture Industries
    • Barbara Carkenord, CBAP, IIBA-AAC, PMI-PBA, PMP, SAFe POPM, President, Carkenord Consulting
    • Danelkis Serra, CBAP, Chapter Operations Manager, Regions & Chapters, IIBA (International Institute of Business Analysis)
    • Lorrie Staples-Ellis, CyberSecurity Integration Strategist, Wealth Management, Truist Bank
    • Ginger Sundberg, Independent Consultant
    • Kham Raven, Project Manager, Fraud Strategy & Execution, Truist Bank
    • Sarah Vollett, PMP, Business Analyst, Operations, College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia
    • Nicole J Coyle, ICP-ACC, CEAC, SPC4, SASM, POPM, CSM, ECM, CCMP, CAPM, Team Agile Coach and Team Facilitator, HCQIS Foundational Components
    • Joe Glower, IT Director, Jet Support Services, Inc. (JSSI)
    • Harsh Daharwal, Senior Director, Application Delivery, J.R. Simplot
    • Hans Eckman, Principal Research Director, Info-Tech Research Group
    • Valence Howden, Principal Research Director, Info-Tech Research Group

    Establish an Analytics Operating Model

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}339|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $8,449 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 6 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Data Management
    • Parent Category Link: /data-management
    • Organizations are struggling to understand what's involved in the analytics developer lifecycle to generate reusable insights faster.
    • Discover what it takes to become a citizen analytics developer. Identify the proper way to enable self-serve analytics.
    • Self-serve business intelligence/analytics is misunderstood and confusing to the business, especially with regards to the roles and responsibilities of IT and the business.
    • End users are dissatisfied due to a lack of access to the data and the absence of a single source of truth.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Organizations that take data seriously should:

    • Decouple processes in which data is separated from business processes and elevate the visibility of the organization's data assets.
    • Leverage a secure platform where data can be easily exchanged for insights generation.
    • Create density for analytics where resources are mobilized around analytics ideas to generate value.

    Analytics is a journey, not a destination. This journey can eventually result in some level of sophisticated AI/machine learning in your organization. Every organization needs to mobilize its resources and enhance its analytics capabilities to quickly and incrementally add value to data products and services. However, most organizations fail to mobilize their resources in this way.

    Impact and Result

    • Firms become more agile when they realize efficiencies in their analytics operating models and can quickly implement reusable analytics.
    • IT becomes more flexible and efficient in understanding the business' data needs and eliminates redundant processes.
    • Trust in data-driven decision making goes up with collaboration, engagement, and transparency.
    • There is a clear path to continuous improvement in analytics.

    Establish an Analytics Operating Model Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief that outlines Info-Tech’s methodology for assessing the business' analytics needs and aligning your data governance, capabilities, and organizational structure to deliver analytics faster.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Define your analytics needs

    This phase helps you understand your organization's data landscape and current analytics environment so you gain a deeper understanding of your future analytics needs.

    • Establish an Analytics Operating Model – Phase 1: Define Your Analytics Needs

    2. Establish an analytics operating model

    This phase introduces you to data operating model frameworks and provides a step-by-step guide on how to capture the right analytics operating model for your organization.

    • Establish an Analytics Operating Model – Phase 2: Establish an Analytics Operating Model
    • Analytics Operating Model Building Tool

    3. Implement your operating model

    This phase helps you implement your chosen analytics operating model, as well as establish an engagement model and communications plan.

    • Establish an Analytics Operating Model – Phase 3: Implement Your Analytics Operating Model
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Establish an Analytics Operating Model

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Define Your Analytics Needs

    The Purpose

    Achieve a clear understanding and case for data analytics.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A successful analytics operating model starts with a good understanding of your analytical needs.

    Activities

    1.1 Review the business context.

    1.2 Understand your analytics needs.

    1.3 Draft analytics ideas and use cases.

    1.4 Capture minimum viable analytics.

    Outputs

    Documentation of analytics products and services

    2 Perform an Analytics Capability Assessment

    The Purpose

    Achieve a clear understanding of your organization's analytics capability and mapping across organizational functions.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understand your organization's data landscape and current analytics environment to gain a deeper understanding of your future analytics needs.

    Activities

    2.1 Capture your analytics capabilities.

    2.2 Map capabilities to a hub-and-spoke model.

    2.3 Document operating model results.

    Outputs

    Capability assessment results

    3 Establish an Analytics Operating Model

    The Purpose

    Capture the right analytics operating model for your organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Explore data operating model frameworks.

    Capture the right analytics operating model for your organization using a step-by-step guide.

    Activities

    3.1 Discuss your operating model results.

    3.2 Review your organizational structure’s pros and cons.

    3.3 Map resources to target structure.

    3.4 Brainstorm initiatives to develop your analytics capabilities.

    Outputs

    Target operating model

    4 Implement Your Analytics Operating Model

    The Purpose

    Formalize your analytics organizational structure and prepare to implement your chosen analytics operating model.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Implement your chosen analytics operating model.

    Establish an engagement model and communications plan.

    Activities

    4.1 Document your target organizational structure and RACI.

    4.2 Establish an analytics engagement model.

    4.3 Develop an analytics communications plan.

    Outputs

    Reporting and analytics responsibility matrix (RACI)

    Analytics engagement model

    Analytics communications plan

    Analytics organizational chart

    Spread Best Practices With an Agile Center of Excellence

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}152|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $97,499 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 26 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Development
    • Parent Category Link: /development
    • Your organization is looking to create consistency across all Agile teams to drive greater business results and alignment.
    • You are seeking to organically grow Agile capabilities within the organization through a set of support structures and facilitated through shared learning and capabilities.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Social capital can be an enabler, but also a barrier. People can only manage a finite number of relationships; ensure that the connections the Center of Excellence (CoE) facilitates are purposeful.
    • Don’t over govern. Empowerment is critical to enable improvements; set boundaries and let teams work inside them with autonomy.
    • Legitimize through listening. A CoE will not be leveraged unless it aligns with the needs of its users. Invest the time to align with the functional expectations of your Agile teams.

    Impact and Result

    • Create a set of service offerings aligned with both corporate objectives and the functional expectations of its customers to ensure broad support and utility of the invested resources.
    • Understand some of the cultural and processual challenges you will face when forming a center of excellence, and address them using Info-Tech’s Agile adoption model.

    Spread Best Practices With an Agile Center of Excellence Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should build an Agile Center of Excellence, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Strategically align the Center of Excellence

    Create strategic alignment between the CoE and the organization’s goals, objectives, and vision.

    • Spread Best Practices With an Agile Center of Excellence – Phase 1: Strategically Align the Center of Excellence

    2. Standardize the Center of Excellence’s service offerings

    Build an engagement plan based on a standardized adoption model to ensure your CoE service offerings are accessible and consistent across the organization.

    • Spread Best Practices With an Agile Center of Excellence – Phase 2: Standardize the Center of Excellence’s Service Offerings

    3. Operate the Center of Excellence

    Operate the CoE to provide service offerings to Agile teams, identify improvements to optimize the function of your Agile teams, and effectively manage and communicate change.

    • Spread Best Practices With an Agile Center of Excellence – Phase 3: Operationalize Your Agile Center of Excellence
    • ACE Satisfaction Survey
    • CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool
    • ACE Benefits Tracking Tool
    • ACE Communications Deck
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Spread Best Practices With an Agile Center of Excellence

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Determine Vision of CoE

    The Purpose

    Create strategic alignment between the CoE and the organization’s goals, objectives, and vision.

    Understand how your key stakeholders will impact the longevity of your CoE.

    Determine your CoE structure and staff.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Top-down alignment with strategic aims of the organization.

    A set of high-level use cases to form the CoE’s service offerings around.

    Visualization of key stakeholders, with their current and desired power and involvement documented.

    Activities

    1.1 Identify and prioritize organizational business objectives.

    1.2 Form use cases for the points of alignment between your Agile Center of Excellence (ACE) and business objectives.

    1.3 Prioritize your ACE stakeholders.

    Outputs

    Prioritized business objectives

    Business-aligned use cases to form CoE’s service offerings

    Stakeholder map of key influencers

    2 Define Service Offerings of CoE

    The Purpose

    Document the functional expectations of the Agile teams.

    Refine your business-aligned use cases with your collected data to achieve both business and functional alignment.

    Create a capability map that visualizes and prioritizes your key service offerings.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understanding of some of the identified concerns, pain points, and potential opportunities from your stakeholders.

    Refined use cases that define the service offerings the CoE provides to its customers.

    Prioritization for the creation of service offerings with a capability map.

    Activities

    2.1 Classified pains and opportunities.

    2.2 Refine your use cases to identify your ACE functions and services.

    2.3 Visualize your ACE functions and service offerings with a capability map.

    Outputs

    Classified pains and opportunities

    Refined use cases based on pains and opportunities identified during ACE requirements gathering

    ACE Capability Map

    3 Define Engagement Plans

    The Purpose

    Align service offerings with an Agile adoption model so that teams have a structured way to build their skills.

    Standardize the way your organization will interact with the Center of Excellence to ensure consistency in best practices.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Mechanisms put in place for continual improvement and personal development for your Agile teams.

    Interaction with the CoE is standardized via engagement plans to ensure consistency in best practices and predictability for resourcing purposes.

    Activities

    3.1 Further categorize your use cases within the Agile adoption model.

    3.2 Create an engagement plan for each level of adoption.

    Outputs

    Adoption-aligned service offerings

    Role-based engagement plans

    4 Define Metrics and Plan Communications

    The Purpose

    Develop a set of metrics for the CoE to monitor business-aligned outcomes with.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    The foundations of continuous improvement are established with a robust set of Agile metrics.

    Activities

    4.1 Define metrics that align with your Agile business objectives.

    4.2 Define target ACE performance metrics.

    4.3 Define Agile adoption metrics.

    4.4 Assess the interaction and communication points of your Agile team.

    4.5 Create a communication plan for change.

    Outputs

    Business objective-aligned metrics

    CoE performance metrics

    Agile adoption metrics

    Assessment of organizational design

    CoE communication plan

    Further reading

    Spread Best Practices With an Agile Center of Excellence

    Achieve ongoing alignment between Agile teams and the business with a set of targeted service offerings.

    ANALYST PERSPECTIVE

    "Inconsistent processes and practices used across Agile teams is frequently cited as a challenge to adopting and scaling Agile within organizations. (VersionOne’s 13th Annual State of Agile Report [N=1,319]) Creating an Agile Center of Excellence (ACE) is a popular way to try to impose structure and improve performance. However, simply establishing an ACE does not guarantee you will be successful with Agile. When setting up an ACE you must: Define ACE services based on identified stakeholder needs. Staff the ACE with respected, “hands on” people, who deliver identifiable value to your Agile teams. Continuously evolve ACE service offerings to maximize stakeholder satisfaction and value delivered."

    Alex Ciraco, Research Director, Applications Practice Info-Tech Research Group

    Our understanding of the problem

    This Research Is Designed For:

    • A CIO who is looking for a way to optimize their Agile capabilities and ensure ongoing alignment with business objectives.
    • An applications director who is looking for mechanisms to inject continuous improvement into organization-wide Agile practices.

    This Research Will Help You:

    • Align your Agile support structure with business objectives and the functional expectations of its users.
    • Standardize the ways in which Agile teams develop and learn to create consistency in purpose and execution.
    • Track and communicate successes to ensure the long-term viability of an Agile Center of Excellence (ACE).

    This Research Will Also Assist

    • Project managers who are tasked with managing Agile projects.
    • Application development managers who are struggling with establishing consistency, transparency, and collaboration across their teams.

    This Research Will Help Them:

    • Provide service offerings to their team members that will help them personally and collectively to develop desired skills.
    • Provide oversight and transparency into Agile projects and outcomes through ongoing monitoring.

    Executive summary

    Situation

    • Your organization has had some success with Agile, but needs to drive consistency across Agile teams for better business results and alignment.
    • You are seeking to organically grow Agile capabilities within the organization through a set of support services and facilitated through shared learning and capabilities.

    Complication

    • Organizational constraints, culture clash, and lack of continuous top-down support are hampering your Agile growth and maturity.
    • Attempts to create consistency across Agile teams and processes fail to account for the expectations of users and stakeholders, leaving them detached from projects and creating resistance.

    Resolution

    • Align the service offerings of your ACE with both corporate objectives and the functional expectations of its stakeholders to ensure broad support and utilization of the invested resources.
    • Understand some of the culture and process challenges you will face when forming an ACE, and address them using Info-Tech’s Agile adoption journey model.
    • Track the progress of the ACE and your Agile teams. Use this data to find root causes for issues, and ideate to implement solutions for challenges as they arise over time.
    • Effectively define and propagate improvements to your Agile teams in order to drive business-valued results.
    • Communicate progress to interested stakeholders to ensure long-term viability of the Center of Excellence (CoE).

    Info-Tech Insight

    1. Define ACE services based on stakeholder needs.Don’t assume you know what your stakeholders need without talking to them.
    2. Staff the ACE strategically. Choose those who are thought leaders and proven change agents.
    3. Continuously improve based on metrics and feedback.Constantly monitor how your ACE is performing and adjust to feedback.

    Info-Tech’s Agile Journey related Blueprints

    1. Stabilize

    Implement Agile Practices That Work

    Begin your Agile transformation with a comprehensive readiness assessment and a pilot project to adopt Agile development practices and behaviors that fit.

    2. Sustain

    YOU ARE HERE

    Spread Best Practices with an Agile Center of Excellence

    Form an ACE to support Agile development at all levels of the organization with thought leadership, strategic development support & process innovation.

    3. Scale

    Enable Organization-Wide Collaboration by Scaling Agile

    Extend the benefits of your Agile pilot project into your organization by strategically scaling Agile initiatives that will meet stakeholders’ needs.

    4. Satisfy

    Transition to Product Delivery Introduce product-centric delivery practices to drive greater benefits and better delivery outcomes.

    1.1 Determine the vision of your ACE

    1.2 Define the service offerings of your ACE

    2.1 Define an adoption plan for Agile teams

    2.2 Create an ACE engagement plan

    2.3 Define metrics to measure success

    3.1 Optimize the success of your ACE

    3.2 Plan change to enhance your Agile initiatives

    3.3 Conduct ongoing retrospectives

    Supporting Capabilities and Practices

    Modernize Your SDLC

    Remodel the stages of your lifecycle to standardize your definition of a successful product.

    Build a Strong Foundation for Quality

    Instill quality assurance practices and principles in each stage of your software development lifecycle.

    Implement DevOps Practices That Work

    Fix, deploy, and support applications quicker though development and operations collaboration.

    What is an Agile Center of Excellence?

    NOTE: Organizational change is hard and prone to failure. Determine your organization’s level of readiness for Agile transformation (and recommended actions) by completing Info-Tech’s Agile Transformation Readiness Tool.

    An ACE amplifies good practices that have been successfully employed within your organization, effectively allowing you to extend the benefits obtained from your Agile pilot(s) to a wider audience.

    From the viewpoint of the business, members of the ACE provide expertise and insights to the entire organization in order to facilitate Agile transformation and ensure standard application of Agile good practices.

    From the viewpoint of your Agile teams, it provides a community of individuals that share experiences and lessons learned, propagate new ideas, and raise questions or concerns so that delivering business value is always top of mind.

    An ACE provides the following:

    1. A mechanism to gather thought leadership to maximize the accessibility and reach of your Agile investment.
    2. A mechanism to share innovations and ideas to facilitate knowledge transfer and ensure broadly applicable innovations do not go to waste.
    3. Strategic alignment to ensure that Agile practices are driving value towards business objectives.
    4. Purposeful good practices to ensure that the service offerings provided align with expectations of both your Agile practitioners and stakeholders.

    SIDEBAR: What is a Community of Practice? (And how does it differ from a CoE?)

    Some organizations prefer Communities of Practice (CoP) to Centers of Excellence (CoE). CoPs are different from CoEs:

    A CoP is an affiliation of people who share a common practice and who have a desire to further the practice itself … and of course to share knowledge, refine best practices, and introduce standards. CoPs are defined by their domain of interest, but the membership is a social structure comprised of volunteer practitioners

    – Wenger, E., R. A. McDermott, et al. (2002) Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge, Harvard Business Press.

    CoPs differ from a CoE mainly in that they tend to have no geographical boundaries, they hold no hierarchical power within a firm, and they definitely can never have structure determined by the company. However, one of the most obvious and telling differences lies in the stated motive of members – CoPs exist because they have active practitioner members who are passionate about a specific practice, and the goals of a CoP are to refine and improve their chosen domain of practice – and the members provide discretionary effort that is not paid for by the employer

    – Matthew Loxton (June 1, 2011) CoP vs CoE – What’s the difference, and Why Should You Care?, Wordpress.com

    What to know about CoPs:

    1. Less formal than a CoE
      • Loosely organized by volunteer practitioners who are interested in advancing the practice.
    2. Not the Authoritative Voice
      • Stakeholders engage the CoP voluntarily, and are not bound by them.
    3. Not funded by Organization
      • CoP members are typically volunteers who provide support in addition to their daily responsibilities.
    4. Not covered in this Blueprint
      • In depth analysis on CoPs is outside the scope of this Blueprint.

    What does an ACE do? Six main functions derived from Info-Tech’s CLAIM+G Framework

    1. Learning
    • Provide training and development and enable engagement based on identified interaction points to foster organizational growth.
  • Tooling
    • Promote the use of standardized tooling to improve efficiency and consistency throughout the organization.
  • Supporting
    • Enable your Agile teams to access subject-matter expertise by facilitating knowledge transfer and documenting good practices.
  • Governing
    • Create operational boundaries for Agile teams, and monitor their progress and ability to meet business objectives within these boundaries.
  • Monitoring
    • Demonstrate the value the CoE is providing through effective metric setting and ongoing monitoring of Agile’s effectiveness.
  • Guiding
    • Provide guidance, methodology, and knowledge for teams to leverage to effectively meet organizational business objectives.
  • Many organizations encounter challenges to scaling Agile

    Tackle the following barriers to Agile adoption with a business-aligned ACE.

    List based on reported impediments from VersionOne’s 13th Annual State of Agile Report (N=1,319)

    1. Organizational culture at odds with Agile values
    • The ACE identifies and measures the value of Agile to build support from senior business leaders for shifting the organizational culture and achieving tangible business benefits.
  • General organizational resistance to change
    • Resistance comes from a lack of trust. Optimized value delivery from Info-Tech’s Agile adoption model will build the necessary social capital to drive cultural change.
  • Inadequate management support and sponsorship
    • Establishing an ACE will require senior management support and sponsorship. Its formation sends a strong signal to the organizational leadership that Agile is here to stay.
  • Lack of skills/experience with Agile methods
    • The ACE provides a vehicle to absorb external training into an internal development program so that Agile capabilities can be grown organically within the organization.
  • Inconsistent processes and practices across teams
    • The ACE provides support to individual Agile teams and will guide them to adopt consistent processes and practices which have a proven track record in the organization.
  • Insufficient training and education
    • The ACE will assist teams with obtaining the Agile skills training they need to be effective in the organization, and support a culture of continuous learning.
  • Overcome your Agile scaling challenges with a business aligned ACE

    An ACE drives consistency and transparency without sacrificing the ability to innovate. It can build on the success of your Agile pilot(s) by encouraging practices known to work in your organization.

    Support Agile Teams

    Provide services designed to inject evolving good practices into workflows and remove impediments or roadblocks from your Agile team’s ability to deliver value.

    Maintain Business Alignment

    Maintain alignment with corporate objectives without impeding business agility in the long term. The ACE functions as an interface layer so that changing expectations can be adapted without negatively impacting Agile teams.

    Facilitate Learning Events

    Avoid the risk of innovation and subject-matter expertise being lost or siloed by facilitating knowledge transfer and fostering a continuous learning environment.

    Govern Improvements

    Set baselines, monitor metrics, and run retrospectives to help govern process improvements and ensure that Agile teams are delivering expected benefits.

    Shift Culture

    Instill Agile thinking and behavior into the organization. The ACE must encourage innovation and be an effective agent for change.

    Use your ACE to go from “doing” Agile to “being” Agile

    Organizations that do Agile without embracing the changes in behavior will not reap the benefits.

    Doing what was done before

    • Processes and Tools
    • Comprehensive Documentation
    • Contract Negotiation
    • Following a Plan

    Being Prescriptive

    Going through the motions

    • Uses SCRUM and tools such as Jira
    • Plans multiple sprints in detail
    • Talks to stakeholders once in a release
    • Works off a fixed scope BRD

    Doing Agile

    Living the principles

    • Individuals and Interactions
    • Working Software
    • Customer Collaboration
    • Responding to Change

    Being Agile

    “(‘Doing Agile’ is) just some rituals but without significant change to support the real Agile approach as end-to-end, business integration, value focus, and team empowerment.” - Arie van Bennekum

    Establishing a CoE does not guarantee success

    Simply establishing a Center of Excellence for any discipline does not guarantee its success:

    The 2019 State of DevOps Report found that organizations which had established DevOps CoEs underperformed compared to organizations which adopted other approaches for driving DevOps transformation. (Accelerate State of DevOps Report 2019 [N=~1,000])

    Still, Agile Centers of Excellence can and do successfully drive Agile adoption in organizations. So what sets the successful examples apart from the others? Here’s what some have to say:

    The ACE must be staffed with qualified people with delivery experience! … [It is] effectively a consulting practice, that can evolve and continuously improve its services … These services are collectively about ‘enablement’ as an output, more than pure training … and above all, the ability to empirically measure the progress” – Paul Blaney, TD Bank

    “When leaders haven’t themselves understood and adopted Agile approaches, they may try to scale up Agile the way they have attacked other change initiatives: through top-down plans and directives. The track record is better when they behave like an Agile team. That means viewing various parts of the organization as their customers.” – HBR, “Agile at Scale”

    “the Agile CoE… is truly meant to be measured by the success of all the other groups, not their own…[it] is meant to be serving the teams and helping them improve, not by telling them what to do, but rather by listening, understanding and helping them adapt.” - Bart Gerardi, PMI

    The CoE must also avoid becoming static, as it’s crucial the team can adjust as quickly as business and customer needs change, and evolve the technology as necessary to remain competitive.” – Forbes, “RPA CoE (what you need to know)”

    "The best CoEs are formed from thought leaders and change agents within the CoE domain. They are the process and team innovators who will influence your CoE roadmap and success. Select individuals who feel passionate about Agile." – Hans Eckman, InfoTech

    To be successful with your ACE, do the following…

    Info-Tech Insight

    Simply establishing an Agile Center of Excellence does not guarantee its success. When setting up your ACE, optimize its impact on the organization by doing the following 3 things:

    1. Define ACE services based on stakeholder needs. Be sure to broadly survey your stakeholders and identify the ACE functions and services which will best meet their needs. ACE services must clearly deliver business value to the organization and the Agile teams it supports.
    2. Staff the ACE strategically. Select ACE team members who have real world, hands-on delivery experience, and are well respected by the Agile teams they will serve. Where possible, select internal thought leaders in your organization who have the credibility needed to effect positive change.
    3. Continuously improve ACE services based on metrics and feedback. The value your ACE brings to the organization must be clear and measurable, and do not assume that your functions and services will remain static. You must regularly monitor both your metrics and feedback from your Agile teams, and adjust ACE behavior to improve/maximize these over time.

    Spread Best Practices With an Agile Center of Excellence

    This blueprint will walk you through the steps needed to build the foundations for operational excellence within an Agile Center of Excellence.

    Phase 1 - Strategically Align the CoE

    Create strategic alignment between the CoE and the organization’s goals, objectives, and vision. This alignment translates into the CoE mandate intended to enhance the way Agile will enable teams to meet business objectives.

    Phase 2 - Standardize the CoEs Service Offerings

    Build an engagement plan based on a standardized adoption model to ensure your CoE service offerings are accessible and consistent across the organization. Create and consolidate key performance indicators to measure the CoEs utility and whether or not the expected value is being translated to tangible results.

    Phase 3 - Operate the CoE

    Operate the CoE to provide service offerings to Agile teams, identify improvements to optimize the function of your Agile teams, and effectively manage and communicate change so that teams can grow within the Agile adoption model and optimize value delivery both within your Agile environment and across functions.

    Info-Tech’s Practice Adoption Journey

    Use Info-Tech’s Practice Adoption Journey model to establish your ACE. Building social capital (stakeholders’ trust in your ability to deliver positive outcomes) incrementally is vital to ensure that everyone is aligned to new mindsets and culture as your Agile practices scale.

    Trust & Competency ↓

    DEFINE

    Begin to document your development workflow or value chain, implement a tracking system for KPIs, and start gathering metrics and reporting them transparently to the appropriate stakeholders.

    ITERATE

    Use collected metrics and retrospectives to stabilize team performance by reducing areas of variability in your workflow and increasing the consistency at which targets are met.

    COLLABORATE

    Use information to support changes and adopt appropriate practices to make incremental improvements to the existing environment.

    EMPOWER

    Drive behavioral and cultural changes that will empower teams to be accountable for their own success and learning.

    INNOVATE

    Use your built-up trust and support practice innovation, driving the definition and adoption of new practices.

    Align your ACE with your organization’s strategy

    This research set will assist you with aligning your ACEs services to the objectives of the business in order to justify the resources and funding required by your Agile program.

    Business Objectives → Alignment ←ACE Functions

    Business justification to continue to fund a Center of Excellence can be a challenge, especially with traditional thinking and rigid stakeholders. Hit the ground running and show value to your key influencers through business alignment and metrics that will ensure that the ACE is worth continuous investment.

    Alignment leads to competitive advantage

    The pace of change in customer expectations, competitive landscapes, and business strategy is continuously increasing. It is critical to develop a method to facilitate ongoing alignment to shifting business and development expectations seamlessly and ensure that your Agile teams are able to deliver expected business value.

    Use Info-Tech’s CoE Operating Model to define the service offerings of your ACE

    Understand where your inputs and outputs lie to create an accessible set of service offerings for your Agile teams.

    The image shows a graphic of the COE Operating Model, showing the inputs and outputs, including Other CoEs (at top); Stakeholder Needs (at left); Metrics and Feedback (at bottom); and ACE Functions and Services (at right)

    Continuously improve the ACE to ensure long-term viability

    Improvement involves the continuous evaluation of the performance of your teams, using well-defined metrics and reasonable benchmarks that are supplemented by analogies and root-cause analysis in retrospectives.

    Monitor

    Monitor your metrics to ensure desired benefits are being realized. The ACE is responsible for ensuring that expected Agile benefits are achievable and on track. Monitor against your defined baselines to create transparency and accountability for desired outcomes.

    Iterate

    Run retrospectives to drive improvements and fixes into Agile projects and processes. Metrics falling short of expectations must be diagnosed and their root causes found, and fixes need to be communicated and injected back into the larger organization.

    Define

    Define metrics and set targets that align with the goals of the ACE. These metrics represent the ACEs expected value to the organization and must be measured against on a regular basis to demonstrate value to your key stakeholders.

    Beware the common risks of implementing your ACE

    Culture clash between Agile teams and larger organization

    Agile leverages empowered teams, meritocracy, and broad collaboration for success, but typical organizations are siloed and hierarchical with top down decision making. There needs to be a plan to enable a smooth transition from the current state towards the Agile target state.

    Persistence of tribal knowledge

    Agile relies on easy and open knowledge sharing, but organizational knowledge can sit in siloes. Employees may also try to protect their expertise for job security. It is important to foster knowledge sharing to ensure that critical know-how is accessible and doesn’t leave the organization with the individual.

    Rigid management structures

    Rigidity in how managers operate (performance reviews, human resource management, etc.) can result in cultural rejection of Agile. People need to be assessed on how they enable their teams rather than as individual contributors. This can help ensure that they are given sufficient opportunities to succeed. More support and less strict governance is key.

    Breakdown due to distributed teams

    When face-to-face interactions are challenging, ensure that you invest in the right communication technologies and remove cultural and process impediments to facilitate organization-wide collaboration. Alternative approaches like using documentation or email will not provide the same experience and value as a face-to-face conversation.

    The State of Maine used an ACE to foster positive cultural change

    CASE STUDY

    Industry - Government

    Source - Cathy Novak, Agile Government Leadership

    The State of Maine’s Agile Center of Excellence

    “The Agile CoE in the State of Maine is completely focused on the discipline of the methodology. Every person who works with Agile, or wants to work with Agile, belongs to the CoE. Every member of the CoE tells the same story, approaches the methodology the same way, and uses the same tools. The CoE also functions as an Agile research lab, experimenting with different standards and tools.

    The usual tools of project management – mission, goals, roles, and a high-level definition of done – can be found in Maine’s Agile CoE. For story mapping, teams use sticky notes on a large wall or whiteboard. Demonstrating progress this way provides for positive team dynamics and a psychological bang. The State of Maine uses a project management framework that serves as its single source of truth. Everyone knows what’s going on at all times and understands the purpose of what they are doing. The Agile team is continually looking for components that can be reused across other agencies and programs.”

    Results:

    • Realized positive culture change, leading to more collaborative and supportive teams.
    • Increased visibility of Agile benefits across functional groups.
    • Standardized methodology across Agile teams and increased innovation and experimentation with new standards and tools.
    • Improved traceability of projects.
    • Increased visibility and ability to determine root causes of problems and right the course when outcomes are not meeting expectations.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    “Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

    Workshop

    “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

    Consulting

    “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Spread Best Practices With an Agile Center of Excellence – project overview

    1. Strategically align the Center of Excellence 2. Standardize the CoEs service offerings 3. Operate the Center of Excellence
    Best-Practice Toolkit

    1.1 Determine the vision of your ACE.

    1.2 Define the service offerings of your ACE.

    2.1 Define an adoption plan for your Agile teams.

    2.2 Create an ACE engagement plan.

    2.3 Define metrics to measure success.

    3.1 Optimize the success of your ACE.

    3.2 Plan change to enhance your Agile initiatives.

    3.3 Conduct ongoing retrospectives of your ACE.

    Guided Implementations
    • Align your ACE with the business.
    • Align your ACE with its users.
    • Dissect the key attributes of Agile adoption.
    • Form engagement plans for your Agile teams.
    • Discuss effective ACE metrics.
    • Conduct a baseline assessment of your Agile environment.
    • Interface ACE with your change management function.
    • Build a communications deck for key stakeholders.
    Onsite Workshop Module 1: Strategically align the ACE Module 2: Standardize the offerings of the ACE Module 3: Prepare for organizational change
    Phase 1 Outcome: Create strategic alignment between the CoE and organizational goals.

    Phase 2 Outcome: Build engagement plans and key performance indicators based on a standardized Agile adoption plan.

    Phase 3 Outcome: Operate the CoEs monitoring function, identify improvements, and manage the change needed to continuously improve.

    Workshop overview

    Contact your account representative or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Workshop Module 1 Workshop Module 2 Workshop Module 3 Workshop Module 4
    Activities

    Determine vision of CoE

    1.1 Identify and prioritize organizational business objectives.

    1.2 Form use cases for the points of alignment between your ACE and business objectives.

    1.3 Prioritize your ACE stakeholders.

    Define service offerings of CoE

    2.1 Form a solution matrix to organize your pain points and opportunities.

    2.2 Refine your use cases to identify your ACE functions and services.

    2.3 Visualize your ACE functions and service offerings with a capability map.

    Define engagement plans

    3.1 Further categorize your use cases within the Agile adoption model.

    3.2 Create an engagement plan for each level of adoption.

    Define metrics and plan communications

    4.1 Define metrics that align with your Agile business objectives.

    4.2 Define target ACE performance metrics.

    4.3 Define Agile adoption metrics.

    4.4 Assess the interaction and communication points of your Agile team.

    4.5 Create a communication plan for change.

    Deliverables
    1. Prioritized business objectives
    2. Business-aligned use cases to form CoEs service offerings
    3. Prioritized list of stakeholders
    1. Classified pains and opportunities
    2. Refined use cases based on pains and opportunities identified during ACE requirements gathering
    3. ACE capability map
    1. Adoption-aligned service offerings
    2. Role-specific engagement plans
    1. Business objective-aligned metrics
    2. ACE performance metrics
    3. Agile adoption metrics
    4. Assessment of organization design
    5. ACE Communication Plan

    Phase 1

    Strategically Align the Center of Excellence

    Spread Best Practices With an Agile Center of Excellence

    Begin by strategically aligning your Center of Excellence

    The first step to creating a high-functioning ACE is to create alignment and consensus amongst your key stakeholders regarding its purpose. Engage in a set of activities to drill down into the organization’s goals and objectives in order to create a set of high-level use cases that will evolve into the service offerings of the ACE.

    Phase 1 - Strategically Align the CoE

    Create strategic alignment between the CoE and the organization’s goals, objectives, and vision. This alignment translates into the CoE mandate intended to enhance the way Agile will enable teams to meet business objectives.

    Phase 2 - Standardize the CoEs Service Offerings

    Build an engagement plan based on a standardized adoption model to ensure your CoE service offerings are accessible and consistent across the organization. Create and consolidate key performance indicators to measure the CoEs utility and whether or not the expected value is being translated to tangible results.

    Phase 3 - Operate the CoE

    Operate the CoE to provide service offerings to Agile teams, identify improvements to optimize the function of your Agile teams, and effectively manage and communicate change so that teams can grow within the Agile adoption model and optimize value delivery both within your Agile environment and across functions.

    Phase 1 outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 1: Strategically align the ACE

    Proposed Time to Completion (in weeks): 1

    Step 1.1: Determine the vision of your ACE

    Start with an analyst kick off call:

    • Align your ACE with the business.

    Then complete these activities…

    1.1.1 Optional: Baseline your ACE maturity.

    1.1.2 Identify and prioritize organizational business objectives.

    1.1.3 Form use cases for the points of alignment between your ACE and business objectives.

    1.1.4 Prioritize your ACE stakeholders.

    1.1.5 Select a centralized or decentralized model for your ACE.

    1.1.6 Staff your ACE strategically.

    Step 1.2: Define the service offerings of your ACE

    Start with an analyst kick off call:

    • Align your ACE with its users.

    Then complete these activities…

    1.2.1 Form the Center of Excellence.

    1.2.2 Gather and document your existing Agile practices for the CoE.

    1.2.3 Interview stakeholders to align ACE requirements with functional expectations.

    1.2.4 Form a solution matrix to organize your pain points and opportunities.

    1.2.5 Refine your use cases to identify your ACE functions and services.

    1.2.6 Visualize your ACE functions and service offerings with a capability map.

    Phase 1 Results & Insights:

    • Aligning your ACE with the functional expectations of its users is just as critical as aligning with the business. Invest the time to understand how the ACE fits at all levels of the organization to ensure its highest effectiveness.

    Phase 1, Step 1: Determine the vision of your ACE

    Phase 1

    1.1 Determine the vision of your ACE

    1.2 Define the service offerings of your ACE

    Phase 2

    2.1 Define an adoption plan for your Agile teams

    2.2 Create an ACE engagement plan

    2.3 Define metrics to measure success

    Phase 3

    3.1 Optimize the success of your ACE

    3.2 Plan change to enhance your Agile initiatives

    3.3 Conduct ongoing retrospectives of your ACE

    Activities:

    1.1.1 Optional: Baseline your ACE maturity.

    1.1.2 Identify and prioritize organizational business objectives.

    1.1.3 Form use cases for the points of alignment between your ACE and business objectives.

    1.1.4 Prioritize your ACE stakeholders.

    1.1.5 Select a centralized or decentralized model for your ACE.

    1.1.6 Staff your ACE strategically.

    Outcomes:

    • Gather your leadership to position the ACE and align it with business priorities.
    • Form a set of high-level use cases for services that will support the enablement of business priorities.
    • Map the stakeholders of the ACE to visualize expected influence and current support levels for your initiative.

    What does an ACE do? Six main functions derived from Info-Tech’s CLAIM+G Framework

    1. Learning
    • Provide training and development and enable engagement based on identified interaction points to foster organizational growth.
  • Tooling
    • Promote the use of standardized tooling to improve efficiency and consistency throughout the organization.
  • Supporting
    • Enable your Agile teams to access subject-matter expertise by facilitating knowledge transfer and documenting good practices.
  • Governing
    • Create operational boundaries for Agile teams, and monitor their progress and ability to meet business objectives within these boundaries.
  • Monitoring
    • Demonstrate the value the CoE is providing through effective metric setting and ongoing monitoring of Agile’s effectiveness.
  • Guiding
    • Provide guidance, methodology, and knowledge for teams to leverage to effectively meet organizational business objectives.
  • OPTIONAL: If you have an existing ACE, use Info-Tech’s CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool to baseline current practices

    1.1.1 Existing CoE Maturity Assessment

    Purpose

    If you already have established an ACE, use Info-Tech’s CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool to baseline its current maturity level (this will act as a baseline for comparison after you complete this Blueprint). Assessing your ACEs maturity lets you know where you currently are, and where to look for improvements.

    Steps

    1. Download the CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool to assess the maturity of your ACE.
    2. Complete the assessment tool with all members of your ACE team to determine your current Maturity score.
    3. Document the results in the ACE Communications Deck.

    Document results in the ACE Communications Deck.

    INFO-TECH DELIVERABLE

    The image is a screen capture of the CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool

    Download the CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool.

    Get your Agile leadership together and position the ACE

    Stakeholder Role Why they are essential players
    CIO/ Head of IT Program sponsor: Champion and set the tone for the Agile program. Critical in gaining and maintaining buy-in and momentum for the spread of Agile service offerings. The head of IT has insight and influence to drive buy-in from executive stakeholders and ensure the long-term viability of the ACE.
    Applications Director Program executor: Responsible for the formation of the CoE and will ensure the viability of the initial CoE objectives, use cases, and service offerings. Having a coordinator who is responsible for collating performance data, tracking results, and building data-driven action plans is essential to ensuring continuous success.
    Agile Subject-Matter Experts Program contributor: Provide information on the viability of Agile practices and help build capabilities on existing best practices. Agile’s success relies on adoption. Leverage the insights of people who have implemented and evangelized Agile within your organization to build on top of a working foundation.
    Functional Group Experts Program contributor: Provide information on the functional group’s typical processes and how Agile can achieve expected benefits. Agile’s primary function is to drive value to the business – it needs to align with the expected capabilities of existing functional groups in order to enhance them for the better.

    Align your ACE with your organization’s strategy

    This research set will assist you with aligning your ACEs services to the objectives of the business in order to justify the resources and funding required by your Agile program.

    Business Objectives → Alignment ←ACE Functions

    Business justification to continue to fund a Center of Excellence can be a challenge, especially with traditional thinking and rigid stakeholders. Hit the ground running and show value to your key influencers through business alignment and metrics that will ensure that the ACE is worth continuous investment.

    Alignment leads to competitive advantage

    The pace of change in customer expectations, competitive landscapes, and business strategy is continuously increasing. It is critical to develop a method to facilitate ongoing alignment to shifting business and development expectations seamlessly and ensure that your Agile teams are able to deliver expected business value.

    Activity: Identify and prioritize organizational business objectives

    1.1.2 2 Hours

    Input

    • Organizational business objectives

    Output

    • Prioritized business objectives

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Agile leadership group
    1. List the primary high-level business objectives that your organization aims to achieve over the course of the following year (focusing on those that ACE can impact/support).
    2. Prioritize these business objectives while considering the following:
    • Criticality of completion: How critical is the initiative in enabling the business to achieve its goals?
    • Transformational impact: To what degree is the foundational structure of the business affected by the initiative (rationale: Agile can support impact on transformational issues)?
  • Document the hypothesized role of Agile in supporting these business objectives. Take the top three prioritized objectives forward for the establishment of your ACE. While in future years or iterations you can inject more offerings, it is important to target your service offerings to specific critical business objectives to gain buy-in for long-term viability of the CoE.
  • Sample Business Objectives:

    • Increase customer satisfaction.
    • Reduce time-to-market of product releases.
    • Foster a strong organizational culture.
    • Innovate new feature sets to differentiate product. Increase utilization rates of services.
    • Reduce product delivery costs.
    • Effectively integrate teams from a merger.
    • Offer more training programs for personal development.
    • Undergo a digital transformation.

    Understand potential hurdles when attempting to align with business objectives

    While there is tremendous pressure to align IT functions and the business due to the accelerating pace of change and technology innovation, you need to be aware that there are limitations in achieving this goal. Keep these challenges at the top of mind as you bring together your stakeholders to position the service offerings of your ACE. It is beneficial to make your stakeholders self-aware of these biases as well, so they come to the table with an open mind and are willing to find common ground.

    The search for total alignment

    There are a plethora of moving pieces within an organization and total alignment is not a plausible outcome.

    The aim of a group should not be to achieve total alignment, but rather reframe and consider ways to ensure that stakeholders are content with the ways they interact and that misalignment does not occur due to transparency or communication issues.

    “The business” implies unity

    While it may seem like the business is one unified body, the reality is that the business can include individuals or groups (CEO, CFO, IT, etc.) with conflicting priorities. While there are shared business goals, these entities may all have competing visions of how to achieve them. Alignment means compromise and agreement more than it means accommodating all competing views.

    Cost vs. reputation

    There is a political component to alignment, and sometimes individual aspirations can impede collective gain.

    While the business side may be concerned with cost, those on the IT side of things can be concerned with taking on career-defining projects to bolster their own credentials. This conflict can lead to serious breakdowns in alignment.

    Panera Bread used Agile to adapt to changing business needs

    CASE STUDY

    Industry Food Services

    Source Scott Ambler and Associates, Case Study

    Challenge

    Being in an industry with high competition, Panera Bread needed to improve its ability to quickly deliver desired features to end customers and adapt to changing business demands from high internal growth.

    Solution

    Panera Bread engaged in an Agile transformation through a mixture of Agile coaching and workshops, absorbing best practices from these engagements to drive Agile delivery frameworks across the enterprise.

    Results

    Adopting Agile delivery practices resulted in increased frequency of solution delivery, improving the relationship between IT and the business. Business satisfaction increased both with the development process and the outcomes from delivery.

    The transparency that was needed to achieve alignment to rapidly changing business needs resulted in improved communication and broad-scale reduced risk for the organization.

    "Agile delivery changed perception entirely by building a level of transparency and accountability into not just our software development projects, but also in our everyday working relationships with our business stakeholders. The credibility gains this has provided our IT team has been immeasurable and immediate."

    – Mike Nettles, VP IT Process and Architecture, Panera Bread

    Use Info-Tech’s CoE Operating Model to define the service offerings of your ACE

    Understand where your inputs and outputs lie to create an accessible set of service offerings for your Agile teams.

    Functional Input

    • Application Development
    • Project Management
    • CIO
    • Enterprise Architecture
    • Data Management
    • Security
    • Infrastructure & Operations
    • Who else?

    The image shows a graphic of the COE Operating Model, showing the inputs and outputs, including Other CoEs (at top); Stakeholder Needs (at left); Metrics and Feedback (at bottom); and ACE Functions and Services (at right)

    Input arrows represent functional group needs, feedback from Agile teams, and collaboration with other CoEs and CoPs

    Output arrows represent the services the CoE delivers and the benefits realized across the organization.

    ACE Operating Model: Governance & Metrics

    Governance & Metrics involves enabling success through the management of the ACEs resources and services, and ensuring that organizational structures evolve in concert with Agile growth and maturity. Your focus should be on governing, measuring, implementing, and empowering improvements.

    Effective governance will function to ensure the long-term effectiveness and viability of your ACE. Changes and improvements will happen continuously and you need a way to decide which to adopt as best practices.

    "Organizations have lengthy policies and procedures (e.g. code deployment, systems design, how requirements are gathered in a traditional setting) that need to be addressed when starting to implement an Agile Center of Excellence. Legacy ideas that end up having legacy policy are the ones that are going to create bottlenecks, waste resources, and disrupt your progress." – Doug Birgfeld, Senior Partner, Agile Wave

    Governance & Metrics

    • Manage organizational Agile standards, policies, and procedures.
    • Define organizational boundaries based on regulatory, compliance, and cultural requirements.
    • Ensure ongoing alignment of service offerings with business objectives.
    • Adapt organizational change management policies to reflect Agile practices.
    • CoE governance functions include:
      • Policy Management
      • Change Management
      • Risk Management
      • Stakeholder Management
      • Metrics/Feedback Monitoring

    ACE Operating Model: Services

    Services refers to the ability to deliver resourcing, guidance, and assistance across all Agile teams. By creating a set of shared services, you enable broad access to specialized resources, knowledge, and insights that will effectively scale to more teams and departments as Agile matures in your organization.

    A Services model:

    • Supports the organization by standardizing and centralizing service offerings, ensuring consistency of service delivery and accessibility across functional groups.
    • Provides a mechanism for efficient knowledge transfer and on-demand support.
    • Helps to drive productivity and project efficiencies through the organization by disseminating best practices.

    Services

    • Provide reference, support, and re-assurance to implement and adapt organizational best practices.
    • Interface relevant parties and facilitate knowledge transfer through shared learning and communities of practice.
    • Enable agreed-upon service levels through standardized support structures.
    • Shared services functions include:
      • Engagement Planning
      • Knowledge Management
      • Subject-Matter Expertise
      • Agile Team Evaluation

    ACE Operating Model: Technology

    Technology refers to a broad range of supporting tools to enable employees to complete their day-to-day tasks and effectively report on their outcomes. The key to technological support is to strike the right balance between flexibility and control based on your organization's internal and external constraints (policy, equipment, people, regulatory, etc.).

    "We sometimes forget the obvious truth that technology provides no value of its own; it is the application of technology to business opportunities that produces return on investment." – Robert McDowell, Author, In Search of Business Value

    Technology

    • Provide common software tools to enable alignment to organizational best practices.
    • Enable access to locally desired tools while considering organizational, technical, and scaling constraints.
    • Enable communication with a technical subject matter expert (SME).
    • Enable reporting consistency through training and maintenance of reporting mechanisms.
    • Technology functions can include:
      • Vendor Management
      • Application Support
      • Tooling Standards
      • Tooling Use Cases

    ACE Operating Model: Staff

    Staff is all about empowerment. The ACE should support and facilitate the sharing of ideas and knowledge sharing. Create processes and spaces where people are encouraged to come together, learn from, and share with each other. This setting will bring up new ideas to enhance productivity and efficiency in day-to-day activities while maintaining alignment with business objectives.

    "An Agile CoE is legitimized by its ability to create a space where people can come together, share, and learn from one another. By empowering teams to grow by themselves and then re-connect with each other you allow the creativity of your employees to flow back into the CoE." – Anonymous, Founder, Agile consultancy group

    Staff

    • Develop and provide training and day-to-day coaching that are aligned with organizational engagement and growth plans.
    • Include workflow change management to assist traditional roles with accommodating Agile practices.
    • Support the facilitation of knowledge transfer from localized Agile teams into other areas of the organization.
    • Achieve team buy-in and engagement with ACE services and capabilities. Provide a forum for collaboration and innovation.
    • People functions can include:
      • Onboarding
      • Coaching
      • Learning Facilitation

    Form use cases to align your ACE with business objectives

    What is a use case?

    A use case tells a story about how a system will be used to achieve a goal from the perspective of a user of that system. The people or other systems that interact with the use case are called “actors.” Use cases describe what a system must be able to do, not how it will do it.

    How does a use case play a role in building your ACE?

    Use cases are used to guide design by allowing you to highlight the intended function of a service provided by the Center of Excellence while maintaining a business focus. Jumping too quickly to a solution without fully understanding user and business needs leads to the loss of stakeholder buy-in and the Centers of Excellence rejection by teams.

    Hypothesized ACE user needs →Use Case←Business objective

    Activity: Form use cases for the points of alignment between your ACE and business objectives

    1.1.3 2 Hours

    Input

    • Prioritized business objectives
    • ACE functions

    Output

    • ACE use cases

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Agile leadership group
    1. Using your prioritized business objectives and the six functions of a CoE, create high-level use cases for each point of alignment that describe how the Center of Excellence will better facilitate the realization of that business objective.
    2. For each use case, define the following:
      • Name: Generalized title for the use case.
      • Description: A high-level description of the expected CoE action.
    AGILE CENTER OF EXCELLENCE FUNCTIONS:
    Guiding Learning Tooling Supporting Governing Monitoring
    BUSINESS OBJECTIVES Reduce time-to-market of product releases
    Reduce product delivery costs
    Effectively integrate teams from a merger

    Activity: Form use cases for the points of alignment between your ACE and business objectives (continued)

    1.1.3 2 Hours

    The image shows the Reduce time-to-market of product releases row from the table in the previous section, filled in with sample information.

    Your goal should be to keep these as high level and generally applicable as possible as they provide an initial framework to further develop your service offerings. Begin to talk about the ways in which the ACE can support the realization of your business objectives and what those interactions may look like to customers of the ACE.

    Involve all relevant stakeholders to discuss the organizational goals and objectives of your ACE

    Avoid the rifts in stakeholder representation by ensuring you involve the relevant parties. Without representation and buy-in from all interested parties, your ACE may omit and fail to meet long-term organizational goals.

    By ensuring every group receives representation, your service offerings will speak for the broad organization and in turn meet the needs of the organization as a whole.

    • Business Units: Any functional groups that will be expected to engage with the ACE in order to achieve their business objectives.
    • Team Leads: Representation from the internal Agile community who is aware of the backgrounds, capabilities, and environments of their respective Agile teams.
    • Executive Sponsors: Those expected to evangelize and set the tone and direction for the ACE within the executive ranks of the organization. These roles are critical in gaining buy-in and maintaining momentum for ACE initiatives.

    Organization

    • ACE
      • Executive Sponsors
      • Team Leads
      • Business Units

    Activity: Prioritize your ACE stakeholders

    1.1.4 1 Hour

    Input

    • Prioritized business objectives

    Output

    • Prioritized list of stakeholders

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Agile leadership group
    1. Using your prioritized business objectives, brainstorm, as a group, the potential list of stakeholders (representatives from business units, team leads, and executive sponsors) that would need to be involved in setting the tone and direction of your ACE.
    2. Evaluate each stakeholder in terms of power, involvement, impact, and support.
    • Power: How much influence does the stakeholder have? Enough to drive the CoE forward or into the ground?
    • Involvement: How interested is the stakeholder? How involved is the stakeholder in the project already?
    • Impact: To what degree will the stakeholder be impacted? Will this significantly change how they do their job?
    • Support: Is the stakeholder a supporter of the project? Neutral? A resister?
  • Map each stakeholder to an area on the power map on the next slide based on his or her level of power and involvement.
  • Vary the size of the circle to distinguish stakeholders that are highly impacted by the ACE from those who are not. Color each circle to show each stakeholder’s estimated or gauged level of support for the project.
  • Prioritize your ACE stakeholders (continued)

    1.1.4 1 Hour

    The image shows a matrix on the left, and a legend on the right. The matrix is labelled with Involvement at the bottom, and Power on the left side, and has the upper left quadrant labelled Keep Satisfied, the upper right quadrant labelled Key players, the lower right quadrant labelled Keep informed, and the lower left quadrant labelled Minimal effort.

    Should your ACE be Centralized or Decentralized?

    An ACE can be organized differently depending on your organization’s specific needs and culture.

    The SAFe Model:©

    “For smaller enterprises, a single centralized [ACE] can balance speed with economies of scale. However, in larger enterprises—typically those with more than 500 – 1,000 practitioners—it’s useful to consider employing either a decentralized model or a hub-and-spoke model.”

    The image shows 3 models: centralized, represented by a single large circle; decentralized, represented by 5 smaller circles; and hub-and-spoke, represented by a central circle, connected to 5 surrounding circles.

    © Scaled Agile, Inc.

    The Spotify Model:

    Spotify avoids using an ACE and instead spreads agile practices using Squads, Tribes, Chapters, Guilds, etc.

    It can be a challenging model to adopt because it is constantly changing, and must be fundamentally supported by your organization’s culture. (Linders, Ben. “Don't Copy the Spotify Model.” InfoQ.com. 6 Oct. 2016.)

    Detailed analysis of The Spotify Model is out of scope for this Blueprint.

    The image shows the Spotify model, with two sections, each labelled Tribe, and members from within each Tribe gathered together in a section labelled Guild.

    Activity: Select a Centralized or Decentralized ACE Model

    1.1.5 30 minutes

    Input

    • Prioritized business objectives
    • Use Cases
    • Organization qualities

    Output

    • Centralized or decentralized ACE model

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Agile leadership group
    1. Using your prioritized business objectives, your ACE use cases, your organization size, structure, and culture, brainstorm the relative pros and cons of a centralized vs decentralized ACE model.
    2. Consider this: to improve understanding and acceptance, ask participants who prefer a centralized model to brainstorm the pros and cons of a decentralized model, and vice-versa.
    3. Collectively decide whether your ACE should be centralized, decentralized or hub-and-spoke and document it.
    Centralized ACE Decentralized ACE
    Pros Cons Pros Cons
    Centralize Vs De-centralize Considerations Prioritized Business Objectives
    • Neutral (objectives don’t favor either model)
    • Neutral (objectives don’t favor either model)
    ACE Use Cases
    • Neutral (use cases don’t favor either model)
    • Neutral (use cases don’t favor either model)
    Organization Size
    • Org. is small enough for centralized ACE
    • Overkill for a small org. like ours
    Organization Structure
    • All development done in one location
    • Not all locations do development
    Organization Culture
    • All development done in one location
    • Decentralized ACE may have yield more buy-in

    SELECTED MODEL: Centralized ACE

    Activity: Staff your ACE strategically

    1.1.6 1 Hour

    Input

    • List of potential ACE staff

    Output

    • Rated list of ACE staff

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Agile leadership group
    1. Identify your list of potential ACE staff (this may be a combination of full time and contract staff).
    2. Add/modify/delete the rating criteria to meet your specific needs.
    3. Discuss and adjust the relative weightings of the rating criteria to best suit your organization’s needs.
    4. Rate each potential staff member and compare results to determine the best suited staff for your ACE.
    Candidate: Jane Doe
    Rating Criteria Criteria Weighting Candidate's Score (1-5)
    Candidate has strong theoretical knowledge of Agile. 8% 4
    Candidate has strong hands on experience with Agile. 18% 5
    Candidate has strong hands on experience with Agile. 10% 4
    Candidate is highly respected by the Agile teams. 18% 5
    Candidate is seen as a thought leader in the organization. 18% 5
    Candidate is seen as a change agent in the organization. 18% 5
    Candidate has strong desire to be member of ACE staff. 10% 3
    Total Weighted Score 4.6

    Phase 1, Step 2: Define the service offerings of your ACE

    Phase 1

    1.1 Determine the vision of your ACE

    1.2 Define the service offerings of your ACE

    Phase 2

    2.1 Define an adoption plan for your Agile teams

    2.2 Create an ACE engagement plan

    2.3 Define metrics to measure success

    Phase 3

    3.1 Optimize the success of your ACE

    3.2 Plan change to enhance your Agile initiatives

    3.3 Conduct ongoing retrospectives of your ACE

    Activities:

    1.2.1 Form the Center of Excellence.

    1.2.2 Gather and document your existing Agile practices for the CoE.

    1.2.3 Interview stakeholders to align ACE requirements with functional expectations.

    1.2.4 Form a solution matrix to organize your pain points and opportunities.

    1.2.5 Refine your use cases to identify your ACE functions and services.

    1.2.6 Visualize your ACE functions and service offerings with a capability map.

    Outcomes:

    • Collect data regarding the functional expectations of the Agile teams.
    • Refine your business-aligned use cases with your collected data to achieve both business and functional alignment.
    • Create a capability map that visualizes and prioritizes your key service offerings.

    Structure your ACE with representation from all of your key stakeholders

    Now that you have a prioritized list of stakeholders, use their influence to position the ACE to ensure maximum representation with minimal bottlenecks.

    By operating within a group of your key players, you can legitimize your Center of Excellence by propagating the needs and interests of those who interface and evangelize the CoE within the larger organization.

    The group of key stakeholders will extend the business alignment you achieved earlier by refining your service offerings to meet the needs of the ACEs customers. Multiple representations at the table will generate a wide arrangement of valuable insights and perspectives.

    Info-Tech Insight

    While holistic representation is necessary, ensure that the list is not too comprehensive and will not lead to progress roadblocks. The goal is to ensure that all factors relevant to the organization are represented; too many conflicting opinions may create an obstruction moving forward.

    ACE

    • Executive Sponsors
    • Team Leads
    • Business Units

    Determine how you will fund your ACE

    Choose the ACE funding model which is most aligned to your current system based on the scenarios provided below. Both models will offer the necessary support to ensure the success of your Agile program going forward.

    Funding Model Funding Scenario I Funding Scenario II
    Funded by the CIO Funded by the CIO office and a stated item within the general IT budget. Charged back to supported functional groups with all costs allocated to each functional group’s budget.
    Funded by the PMO Charged back to supported functional groups with all costs allocated to each functional group’s budget. Charged back to supported functional groups with all costs allocated to each functional group’s budget.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Your funding model may add additional key influencers into the mix. After you choose your funding model, ensure that you review your stakeholder map and add anyone who will have a direct impact in the viability and stability of your ACE.

    Determine how you will govern your ACE

    An Agile Center of Excellence is unique in the way you must govern the actions of its customers. Enable “flexible governance” to ensure that Agile teams have the ability to locally optimize and innovate while still operating within expected boundaries.

    ACE Governing Body

    ↑ Agile Team → ACE ← Agile Team ↑

    Who should take on the governance role?

    The governing body can be the existing executive or standing committees, or a newly formed committee involving your key ACE influencers and stakeholders.

    Flexible governance means that your ACE set boundaries based on your cultural, regulatory, and compliance requirements, and your governance group monitors your Agile teams’ adherence to these boundaries.

    Governing Body Responsibilities

    • Review and approve ACE strategy annually and ensure that it is aligned with current business strategy.
    • Provide detailed quality information for board members.
    • Ensure that the ACE is adequately resourced and that the organization has the capacity to deliver the service offerings.
    • Assure that the ACE is delivering benefits and achieving targets.
    • Assure that the record keeping and reporting systems are capable of providing the information needed to properly assess the quality of service.

    Modify your resourcing strategy based on organizational need

    Your Agile Center of Excellence can be organized either in a dedicated or a virtual configuration, depending on your company’s organizational structure and complexity.

    There is no right answer to how your Center of Excellence should be resourced. Consider your existing organizational structure and culture, the quality of relationships between functional groups, and the typical budgetary factors that would weigh on choosing between a virtual and dedicated CoE structure.

    COE Advantages Disadvantages
    Virtual
    • No change in organization structure required, just additional task delegation to your Agile manager or program manager.
    • Less effort and cost to implement.
    • Investment in quality is proportional to return.
    • Resources are shared between practice areas, and initiatives will take longer to implement.
    • Development and enhancement of best practices can become difficult without a centralized knowledge repository.
    Dedicated
    • Demonstrates a commitment to the ACEs long-term existence.
    • Allows for dedicated maintenance of best practices.
    • Clear lines of accountability for Agile processes.
    • Ability to develop highly skilled employees as their responsibilities are not shared.
    • Requires dedicated resources that can in turn be more costly.
    • Requires strong relationships with the functional groups that interface with the ACE.

    Staffing the ACE: Understand virtual versus dedicated ACE organizational models

    Virtual CoE

    The image shows an organizational chart titled Virtual CoE, with Head of IT at the top, then PMO and CoE Lead/Apps Director at the next level. The chart shows that there is crossover between the CoE Lead's reports, and the PMO's, indicated through dotted lines that connect them.

    • Responsibilities for CoE are split and distributed throughout departments on a part-time basis.
    • CoE members from the PMO report to apps director who also functions as the CoE lead on a part-time basis.

    The image shows a organizational chart titled Dedicated CoE, with all CoE members under the CoE.

    • Requires re-organization and dedicated full-time staff to run the CoE with clear lines of responsibility and accountability.
    • Hiring or developing highly skilled employees who have a sole function to facilitate and monitor quality best practices within the IT department may be necessary.

    Activity: Form the Center of Excellence

    1.2.1 1 Hour

    Input

    • N/A

    Output

    • ACE governance and resourcing plan

    Materials

    • Whiteboard

    Participants

    • Agile leadership group
    1. As a group, discuss if there is an existing body that would be able to govern the Center of Excellence. This body will monitor progress on an ongoing basis and assess any change requests that would impact the CoEs operation or goals.
    • List current governing bodies that are closely aligned with your current Agile environment and determine if the group could take on additional responsibilities.
    • Alternatively, identify individuals who could form a new ACE governing body.
  • Using the results of Exercise 1.1.6 in Step 1, select the individuals who will participate in the Center of Excellence. As a rough rule of thumb for sizing, an ACE staffed with 3-5 people can support 8-12 Agile Teams.
  • Document results in the ACE Communications Deck.

    Leverage your existing Agile practices and SMEs when establishing the ACE

    The synergy between Agile and CoE relies on its ability to build on existing best practices. Agile cannot grow without a solid foundation. ACE gives you the way to disseminate these practices and facilitate knowledge transfer from a centralized sharing environment. As part of defining your service offerings, engage with stakeholders across the organization to evaluate what is already documented so that it can be accommodated in the ACE.

    Documentation

    • Are there any existing templates that can be leveraged (e.g. resource planning, sprint planning)?
    • Are there any existing process documents that can be leveraged (e.g. SIPOC, program frameworks)?
    • Are there any existing standards documents the CoE can incorporate (e.g. policies, procedures, guidelines)?

    SMEs

    • Interview existing subject-matter experts that can give you an idea of your current pains and opportunities.
    • You already have feedback from those in your workshop group, so think about the rest of the organization:
      • Agile practitioners
      • Business stakeholders
      • Operations
      • Any other parties not represented in the workshop group

    Metrics

    • What are the current metrics being used to measure the success of Agile teams?
    • What metrics are currently being used to measure the completion of business objectives?
    • What tools or mediums are currently used for recording and communicating metrics?

    Info-Tech Insight

    When considering existing practices, it is important to evaluate the level of adherence to these practices. If they have been efficiently utilized, injecting them into ACE becomes an obvious decision. If they have been underutilized, however, it is important to understand why this occurred and discuss how you can drive higher adherence.

    Examples of existing documents to leverage

    People

    • Agile onboarding planning documents
    • Agile training documents
    • Organizational Agile manifesto
    • Team performance metrics dashboard
    • Stakeholder engagement and communication plan
    • Development team engagement plan
    • Organizational design and structure
    • Roles and responsibilities chart (i.e. RACI)
    • Compensation plan Resourcing plan

    Process

    • Tailored Scrum process
    • Requirements gathering process
    • Quality stage-gate checklist (including definitions of ready and done)
    • Business requirements document
    • Use case document
    • Business process diagrams
    • Entity relationship diagrams
    • Data flow diagrams
    • Solution or system architecture
    • Application documentation for deployment
    • Organizational and user change management plan
    • Disaster recovery and rollback process
    • Test case templates

    Technology

    • Code review policies and procedures
    • Systems design policies
    • Build, test, deploy, and rollback scripts
    • Coding guidelines
    • Data governance and management policies
    • Data definition and glossary
    • Request for proposals (RFPs)
    • Development tool standards and licensing agreements
    • Permission to development, testing, staging, and production environments
    • Application, system, and data integration policies

    Build upon the lessons learned from your Agile pilots

    The success of your Center of Excellence relies on the ability to build sound best practices within your organization’s context. Use your previous lessons learned and growing pains as shared knowledge of past Agile implementations within the ACE.

    Implement Agile Practices That Work

    Draw on the experiences of your initial pilot where you learned how to adapt the Agile manifesto and practices to your specific context. These lessons will help onboard new teams to Agile since they will likely experience some of the same challenges.

    Download

    Documents for review include:

    • Tailored Scrum Process
    • Agile Pilot Metrics
    • Info-Tech’s Agile Pilot Playbook

    Enable Organization-Wide Collaboration by Scaling Agile

    Draw on previous scaling Agile experiences to help understand how to interface, facilitate, and orchestrate cross-functional teams and stakeholders for large and complex projects. These lessons will help your ACE teams develop collaboration and problem-solving techniques involving roles with different priorities and lines of thinking.

    Download

    Documents for review include:

    • Agile Program Framework
    • Agile Pilot Program Metrics
    • Scaled Agile Development Process
    • Info-Tech’s Scaling Agile Playbook

    Activity: Gather and document your existing Agile practices for the CoE

    1.2.2 Variable time commitment based on current documentation state

    Input

    • Existing practices

    Output

    • Practices categorized within operating model

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • ACE team
    1. Compile a list of existing practices that will be shared by the Center of Excellence. Consider any documents, templates, or tools that are used regularly by Agile teams.
    2. Evaluate the level of adherence to use of the practices (whether the practice is complied with regularly or not) with a high, medium, or low. Low compliance will need a root-cause analysis to understand why and how to remedy the situation.
    3. Determine the best fit for each practice under the ACE operational model.
    Name Type Adherence Level CoE Best Fit Source
    1 Tailored Scrum process Process High Shared Services Internal Wiki
    2
    3

    Activity: Interview stakeholders to understand the ACE functional expectations

    1.2.3 30-60 Minutes per interview

    Interview Stakeholders (from both Agile teams and functional areas) on their needs from the ACE. Ensure you capture both pain points and opportunities. Capture these as either Common Agile needs or Functional needs. Document using the tables below:

    Common Agile Needs
    Common Agile Needs
    • Each Agile Team interprets Agile differently
    • Need common approach to Agile with a proven track record within the organization
    • Making sure all Team members have a good understanding of Agile
    • Common set of tool(s) with a proven track record, along with a strong understanding of how to use the tool(s) efficiently and effectively
    • Help troubleshooting process related questions
    • Assistance with addressing the individual short comings of each Agile Team
    • Determining what sort of help each Agile Team needs most
    • Better understanding of the role played by Scrum Master and associated good practices
    • When and how do security/privacy/regulatory requirements get incorporated into Agile projects
    Functional Needs Ent Arch Needs
    • How do we ensure Ent Arch has insight and influence on Agile software design
    • Better understanding of Agile process
    • How to measure compliance with reference architectures

    PMO Needs

    • Better understanding of Agile process
    • Understanding role of PM in Agile
    • Project status reports that determine current level of project risk
    • How does project governance apply on Agile projects
    • What deliverables/artifacts are produced by Agile projects and when are they completed

    Operations Needs

    • Alignment on approaches for doing releases
    • Impact of Agile on change management and support desk processes
    • How and when will installation and operation instructions be available in Agile

    Activity: Form a solution matrix to organize your pain points and opportunities

    1.2.4 Half day

    Input

    • Identified requirements

    Output

    • Classified pains and opportunities

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • ACE team
    1. Review the listed pain points from the data gathering process. Sort the pain points on sticky notes into technology, governance, people, and shared services.
    2. Consider opportunities under each defining element based on the identified business requirements.
    3. Document your findings.
    4. Discuss the results with the project team and prioritize the opportunities.
      • Where do the most pains occur?
      • What opportunities exist to alleviate pains?
    Governance Shared Services Technology People
    Pain Points
    Opportunities

    Document results in the ACE Communications Deck.

    Activity: Refine your use cases to identify your ACE functions and services

    1.2.5 1 Hour

    Input

    • Use cases from activity 1.1.2

    Output

    • Refined use cases based on data collection

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • ACE team
    1. Refine your initial use cases for the points of alignment between your ACE and business objectives using your classified pain points and opportunities.
    2. Add use cases to address newly realized pain points.
    3. Determine the functions and services the CoE can offer to address the identified requirements.
    4. Evaluate the outputs in the form of realized benefits and extracted inefficiencies.

    Possible ACE use cases:

    • Policy Management
    • Change Management
    • Risk Management
    • Stakeholder Management
    • Engagement Planning
    • Knowledge Management
    • Subject-Matter Expertise
    • Agile Team Evaluation
    • Operations Support
    • Onboarding
    • Coaching
    • Learning Facilitation
    • Communications Training
    • Vendor Management
    • Application Support
    • Tooling Standards

    Document results in the ACE Communications Deck.

    Activity: Visualize your ACE functions and service offerings with a capability map

    1.2.6 1 Hour

    Input

    • Use cases from activity 1.2.4

    Output

    • ACE capability map

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • ACE team
    1. Review the refined and categorized list of service offerings.
    2. Determine how these new capabilities will add, remove, or enhance your existing service and capabilities.
    3. Categorize the capabilities into the following groups:
    • Governance and Metrics
    • Services
    • Staff
    • Technology
  • Label the estimated impact of the service offering based on your business priorities for the year. This will guide your strategy for implementing your Agile Center of Excellence moving forward.
  • Document results in the ACE Communications Deck.

    Activity: Visualize your ACE functions and service offerings with a capability map (continued)

    Governance

    Policy Management (Medium Potential)

    Change Management (High Potential)

    Risk Management (High Potential)

    Stakeholder Management (High Potential)

    Metrics/Feedback Monitoring (High Potential)

    Shared Services

    Engagement Planning (High Potential)

    Knowledge Management (High Potential)

    Subject-Matter Expertise (High Potential)

    Agile Team Evaluation (High Potential)

    Operations Support (High Potential)

    People

    Onboarding (Medium Potential)

    Coaching (High Potential)

    Learning Facilitation (High Potential)

    Internal Certification Program (Low Potential)

    Communications Training (Medium Potential)

    Technology

    Vendor Management (Medium Potential)

    Application Support (Low Potential)

    Tooling Standards (High Potential)

    Checkpoint: Are you ready to standardize your CoEs service offerings?

    Phase 1

    1.1 Determine the vision of your ACE

    1.2 Define the service offerings of your ACE

    Phase 2

    2.1 Define an adoption plan for your Agile teams

    2.2 Create an ACE engagement plan

    2.3 Define metrics to measure success

    Self-Auditing Guidelines

    • Have you identified and prioritized the key business objectives for the upcoming year that the ACE will align with?
    • Do you have a high-level set of use cases for points of alignment between your ACE and business objectives?
    • Have you mapped your stakeholders and identified the key players that will have an influence over the future success of your ACE?
    • Have you identified how your organization will fund, resource, and govern the ACE?
    • Have you collected data to understand the functional expectations of the users the ACE is intended to serve?
    • Have you refined your use cases to align with both business objectives and functional expectations?

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    1.1.2 Identify and prioritize organizational business objectives

    Our analyst team will help you organize and prioritize your business objectives for the year in order to ensure that the service offerings the ACE offers are delivering consistent business value.

    1.1.3 Form use cases for the points of alignment between your ACE and business objectives

    Our analyst team will help you turn your prioritized business objectives into a set of high-level use cases that will provide the foundation for defining user-aligned services.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    1.1.4 Prioritize your ACE stakeholders

    Our analysts will walk you through an exercise of mapping and prioritizing your Centers of Excellence stakeholders based on impact and power within so you can ensure appropriate presentation of interests within the organization.

    1.2.4 Form a solution matrix to organize your pain points and opportunities

    Our analyst team will help you solidify the direction of your Center of Excellence by overlaying your identified needs, pain points, and potential opportunities in a matrix guided by Info-Tech’s CoE operating model.

    1.2.5 Refine your use cases to identify your ACE functions and services

    Our analyst team will help you further refine your business-aligned use cases with the functional expectations from your Agile teams and stakeholders, ensuring the ACEs long-term utility.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    1.2.6 Visualize your ACE functions and service offerings with a capability map

    Our analysts will walk you through creating your Agile Centers of Excellence capability map and help you to prioritize which service offerings are critical to the success of your Agile teams in meeting their objectives.

    Phase 2

    Standardize the Centers of Excellence Service Offerings

    Spread Best Practices With an Agile Center of Excellence

    The ACE needs to ensure consistency in service delivery

    Now that you have aligned the CoE to the business and functional expectations, you need to ensure its service offerings are consistently accessible. To effectively ensure accessibility and delegation of shared services in an efficient way, the CoE needs to have a consistent framework to deliver its services.

    Phase 1 - Strategically Align the CoE

    Create strategic alignment between the CoE and the organization’s goals, objectives, and vision. This alignment translates into the CoE mandate intended to enhance the way Agile will enable teams to meet business objectives.

    Phase 2 - Standardize the CoEs Service Offerings

    Build an engagement plan based on a standardized adoption model to ensure your CoE service offerings are accessible and consistent across the organization. Create and consolidate key performance indicators to measure the CoEs utility and whether or not the expected value is being translated to tangible results.

    Phase 3 - Operate the CoE

    Operate the CoE to provide service offerings to Agile teams, identify improvements to optimize the function of your Agile teams, and effectively manage and communicate change so that teams can grow within the Agile adoption model and optimize value delivery both within your Agile environment and across functions.

    Phase 2 outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 2: Standardize the CoEs Service Offerings

    Proposed Time to Completion (in weeks): 2

    Step 2.1: Define an adoption plan for your Agile teams

    Start with an analyst kick off call:

    • Dissect the key attributes of Agile adoption.

    Then complete these activities…

    2.1.1 Further categorize your use cases within the Agile adoption model.

    Step 2.2: Create an ACE engagement plan

    Start with an analyst kick off call:

    • Form engagement plans for your Agile teams.

    Then complete these activities…

    2.2.1 Create an engagement plan for each level of adoption.

    Step 2.3: Define metrics to measure success

    Finalize phase deliverable:

    • Discuss effective ACE metrics.

    Then complete these activities…

    2.3.1 Collect existing team-level metrics.

    2.3.2 Define metrics that align with your Agile business objectives.

    2.3.3 Define target ACE performance metrics.

    2.3.4 Define Agile adoption metrics.

    2.3.5 Consolidate metrics for stakeholder impact.

    2.3.6 Use Info-Tech’s ACE Benefits Tracking Tool to monitor, evaluate, refine, and ensure continued business value.

    Phase 2 Results & Insights:

    • Standardizing your service offerings allows you to have direct influence on the dissemination of best practices.

    Phase 2, Step 1: Define an adoption plan for your Agile teams

    Phase 1

    1.1 Determine the vision of your ACE

    1.2 Define the service offerings of your ACE

    Phase 2

    2.1 Define an adoption plan for your Agile teams

    2.2 Create an ACE engagement plan

    2.3 Define metrics to measure success

    Phase 3

    3.1 Optimize the success of your ACE

    3.2 Plan change to enhance your Agile initiatives

    3.3 Conduct ongoing retrospectives of your ACE

    Activities:

    2.1.1 Further categorize your use cases within the Agile adoption model.

    Outcomes:

    • Refine your previously determined use cases within the Agile adoption model to ensure that teams can be assisted at any level of Agile adoption.
    • Understand the key attributes of Agile adoption and how they impact success.

    Understand the implementation challenges that the ACE may face

    Culture clash between ACE and larger organization

    It is important to carefully consider the compatibility between the current organizational culture and Agile moving forward. Agile compels empowered teams, meritocracy, and broad collaboration for success; while typical organizational structures are siloed and hierarchical and decisions are delegated from the top down.

    This is not to say that the culture of the ACE has to match the larger organizational culture; part of the overarching aim of the ACE is to evolve the current organizational culture for the better. The point is to ensure you enable a smooth transition with sufficient management support and a team of Agile champions.

    The changing role of middle management

    Very similar to the culture clash challenge, cultural rigidity in how middle managers operate (performance review, human resource management, etc.) can cause cultural rejection. They need to become enablers for high performance and give their teams the sufficient tools, skills, and opportunities to succeed and excel.

    What impedes Agile adoption?

    Based on a global survey of Agile practitioners (N=1,319)*:

    52% Organizational culture at odds with agile values

    44% Inadequate management support and sponsorship

    48% General organization resistance to change

    *Respondents were able to make multiple selections

    (13th Annual State of Agile Report, VersionOne, 2019)

    Build competency and trust through a structured Agile adoption plan

    The reality of cultural incompatibility between Agile and traditional organization structures necessitates a structured adoption plan. Systematically build competency so teams can consistently achieve project success and solidify trust in your teams’ ability to meet business needs with Agile.

    By incrementally gaining the trust of management as you build up your Agile capabilities, you enable a smooth cultural transition to an environment where teams are empowered, adapt quickly to changing needs, and are trusted to innovate and make successes out of their failures.

    Optimized value delivery occurs when there is a direct relationship between competency and trust. There will be unrealized value when competency or trust outweigh the other. That value loss increases as either dimension of adoption continues to grow faster than the other.

    The image shows a graph with Competency on the x-axis and Trust on the y-axis. There are 3 sections: Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3, in subsequently larger arches in the background of the graph. The graph shows two diagonal arrows, the bottom one labelled Current Value Delivery and the top one labelled Optimized Value Delivery. The space between the two arrows is labelled Value Loss.

    Use Info-Tech’s Practice Adoption Optimization Model to systematically increase your teams’ ability to deliver

    Using Info-Tech’s Practice adoption optimization model will ensure you incrementally build competency and trust to optimize your value delivery.

    Agile adoption at its core, is about building social capital. Your level of trust with key influencers increases as you continuously enhance your capabilities, enabling the necessary cultural changes away from traditional organizational structures.

    Trust & Competency ↓

    DEFINE

    Begin to document your development workflow or value chain, implement a tracking system for KPIs, and start gathering metrics and reporting them transparently to the appropriate stakeholders.

    ITERATE

    Use collected metrics and retrospectives to stabilize team performance by reducing areas of variability in your workflow and increasing the consistency at which targets are met.

    COLLABORATE

    Use information to support changes and adopt appropriate practices to make incremental improvements to the existing environment.

    EMPOWER

    Drive behavioral and cultural changes that will empower teams to be accountable for their own success and learning.

    INNOVATE

    Use your built-up trust and support practice innovation, driving the definition and adoption of new practices.

    Review these key attributes of Agile adoption

    Agile adoption is unique to every organization. Consider these key attributes within your own organizational context when thinking about levels of Agile adoption.

    Adoption Attributes

    Team Organization

    Considers the degree to which teams are able to self-organize based on internal organizational structures (hierarchy vs. meritocracy) and inter-team capabilities.

    Team Coordination

    Considers the degree to which teams can coordinate, both within and across functions.

    Business Alignment

    Considers the degree to which teams can understand and/or map to business objectives.

    Coaching

    Considers what kind of coaching/training is offered and how accessible the training is.

    Empowerment

    Considers the degree to which teams are able and capable to address project, process, and technical challenges without significant burden from process controls and bureaucracy.

    Failure Tolerance

    Considers the degree to which stakeholders are risk tolerant and if teams are capable of turning failures into learning outcomes.

    Why are these important?

    These key attributes function as qualities or characteristics that, when improved, will successively increase the degree to which the business trusts your Agile teams’ ability to meet their objectives.

    Systematically improving these attributes as you graduate levels of the adoption model allows the business to acclimatize to the increased capability the Agile team is offering, and the risk of culture clash with the larger organization decreases.

    Start to consider at what level of adoption each of your service offerings become useful. This will allow you to standardize the way your Agile teams interact with the CoE.

    Activity: Further categorize your use cases within the Agile adoption model

    2.1.1 1.5 Hours

    Input

    • List of service offerings

    Output

    • Service offerings categorized within adoption model

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • Team
    1. Gather the list of your categorized use cases.
    2. Based on Info-Tech’s Agile adoption model, categorize which use cases would be useful to help the Agile team graduate to the next level of adoption.
      • Conceptualize: Begin to document your workflow or value chain, implement a tracking system for KPIs, and gather metrics and report them transparently to the appropriate stakeholders.
      • Iterate: Use collected metrics to stabilize team performance by reducing areas of variability in your workflow and increasing the consistency at which targets are met.
      • Collaborate: Use information to drive changes and adopt appropriate Agile practices to make incremental improvements to the existing environment.
      • Empower: Drive behavioral and cultural changes that will empower teams to be accountable for their own successes given the appropriate resources.
      • Innovate: Use your built-up trust to begin to make calculated risks and innovate more, driving new best practices into the CoE.

    The same service offering could be offered at different levels of adoption. In these cases, you will need to re-visit the use case and differentiate how the service (if at all) will be delivered at different levels of adoption.

    1. Use this opportunity to brainstorm alternative or new use cases for any gaps identified. It is the CoEs goal to assist teams at every level of adoption to meet their business objectives. Use a different colored sticky note for these so you can re-visit and map out their inputs, outputs, metrics, etc.

    Activity: Further categorize your use cases within the Agile adoption model (continued)

    2.1.1 1.5 Hours

    Input

    • List of service offerings

    Output

    • Service offerings categorized within adoption model

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • Team

    Example:

    Service Offerings
    Level 5: Innovate
    Level 4: Empower
    Level 3: Collaborate Coaching -- Communications Training
    Level 2: Iterate Tooling Standards
    Level 1: Conceptualize

    Learning Facilitation

    Draw on the service offerings identified in activity 1.2.4

    Phase 2, Step 2: Create an ACE engagement plan

    Phase 1

    1.1 Determine the vision of your ACE

    1.2 Define the service offerings of your ACE

    Phase 2

    2.1 Define an adoption plan for your Agile teams

    2.2 Create an ACE engagement plan

    2.3 Define metrics to measure success

    Phase 3

    3.1 Optimize the success of your ACE

    3.2 Plan change to enhance your Agile initiatives

    3.3 Conduct ongoing retrospectives of your ACE

    Activities:

    2.2.1 Create an engagement plan for each level of adoption.

    Outcomes:

    • Understand the importance of aligning with the functional expectations of your ACE customers.
    • Understand the relationship between engagement and continuous improvement.
    • Create an engagement plan for each level of adoption to standardize the way customers interact with the ACE.

    Enable Agile teams to interface with ACE service offerings to meet their business objectives

    A Center of Excellence aligned with your service offerings is only valuable if your CoEs customers can effectively access those services. At this stage, you have invested in ensuring that your CoE aligns to your business objectives and that your service offerings align to its customers. Now you need to ensure that these services are accessible in the day-to-day operation of your Agile teams.

    Engagement Process → Service Offering

    Use backwards induction from your delivery method to the service offering. This is an effective method to determine the optimal engagement action for the CoE, as it considers the end customer as the driver for best action for every possible situation.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Your engagement process should be largely informed by your ACE users. Teams have constraints as well as in-the-trenches concerns and issues. If your service offerings don’t account for these, it can lead to rejection of the culture you are trying to inspire.

    Show the way, do not dictate

    Do not fix problems for your Agile teams, give them the tools and knowledge to fix the problems themselves.

    Facilitate learning to drive success

    A primary function of your ACE is to transfer knowledge to Agile teams to increase their capability to achieve desired outcomes.

    While this can take the form of coaching, training sessions, libraries, and wikis, a critical component of ACE is creating interactions where individuals from Agile teams can come together and share their knowledge.

    Ideas come from different experiences. By creating communities of practice (CoP) around topics that the ACE is tasked with supporting (e.g. Agile business analysts), you foster social learning and decrease the likelihood that change will result in some sort of cultural rejection.

    Consider whether creating CoPs would be beneficial in your organization’s context.

    "Communities of practice are a practical way to frame the task of managing knowledge. They provide a concrete organizational infrastructure for realizing the dream of a learning organization." – Etienne Wenger, Digital Habitats: Stewarding technology for communities

    A lack of top-down support will result in your ACE being underutilized

    Top-down support is critical to validate the CoE to its customers and ensure they feel compelled to engage with its services. Relevancy is a real concern for the long-term viability of a CoE and championing its use from a position of authority will legitimize its function and deter its fading from relevancy of day-to-day use for Agile teams.

    Although you are aligning your engagement processes to the customers of your Agile Center of Excellence, you still need your key influencers to champion its lasting organizational relevancy. Don’t let your employees think the ACE is just a coordinating body or a committee that is convenient but non-essential – make sure they know that it drives their own personal growth and makes everyone better as a collective.

    "Even if a CoE is positioned to meet a real organizational need, without some measure of top-down support, it faces an uphill battle to remain relevant and avoid becoming simply one more committee in the eyes of the wider organization. Support from the highest levels of the organization help fight the tendency of the larger organization to view the CoE as a committee with no teeth and tip the scales toward relevancy for the CoE." – Joe Shepley, VP and Practice Lead, Doculabs

    Info-Tech Insight

    Stimulate top-down support with internal certifications. This allows your employees to gain accreditation while at the same time encouraging top-down support and creating a compliance check for the continual delivery and acknowledgement of your evolving best practices.

    Ensure that best practices and lessons learned are injected back into the ACE

    For your employees to continuously improve, so must the Center of Excellence. Ensure the ACE has the appropriate mechanisms to absorb and disseminate best practices that emerge from knowledge transfer facilitation events.

    Facilitated Learning Session →Was the localized adaption well received by others in similar roles? →Document Localized Adaptation →Is there broad applicability and benefit to the proposed innovation? →CoE Absorbs as Best Practice

    Continuous improvement starts with the CoE

    While facilitating knowledge transfer is key, it is even more important that the Center of Excellence can take localized adaptations from Agile teams and standardize them as best practices when well received. If an individual were to leave without sharing their knowledge, the CoE and the larger organization will lose that knowledge and potential innovation opportunities.

    Experience matters

    To organically grow your ACE and be cost effective, you want your teams to continuously improve and to share that knowledge. As individual team members develop and climb the adoption model, they should participate as coaches and champions for less experienced groups so that their knowledge is reaching the widest audience possible.

    Case study: Agile learning at Spotify

    CASE STUDY

    Industry Digital Media

    Source Henrik Kniberg & Anders Ivarsson, 2012

    Methods of Agile learning at Spotify

    Spotify has continuously introduced innovative techniques to facilitate learning and ensure that that knowledge gets injected back into the organization. Some examples are the following:

    • Hack days: Self-organizing teams, referred to as squads, come together, try new ideas, and share them with their co-workers. This facilitates a way to stay up to date with new tools and techniques and land new product innovations.
    • Coaching: Every squad has access to an Agile coach to help inject best practices into their workflow – coaches run retrospectives, sprint planning meetings, facilitate one-on-one coaching, etc.
    • Tribes: Collections of squads that hold regular gatherings to show the rest of the tribe what they’ve been working on so others can learn from what they are doing.
    • Chapters: People with similar skills within a tribe come together to discuss their area of expertise and their specific challenges.
    • Guilds: A wide-reaching community of interest where members from different tribes can come together to share knowledge, tools, and codes, and practice (e.g. a tester guild, an Agile coaching guild).

    The image shows the Spotify model, with two sections, each labelled Tribe, and members from within each Tribe gathered together in a section labelled Guild.

    "As an example of guild work, we recently had a ‘Web Guild Unconference,’ an open space event where all web developers at Spotify gathered up in Stockholm to discuss challenges and solutions within their field."

    Activity: Create an engagement plan for each level of adoption

    2.2.1 30 Minutes per role

    Input

    • Categorized use cases

    Output

    • Role-based engagement plans

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • Team
    1. On the top bar, define the role you are developing the engagement plan for. This will give you the ability to standardize service delivery across all individuals in similar roles.
    2. Import your categorized service offerings for each level of adoption that you think are applicable to the given role.
    3. Using backwards induction, determine the engagement processes that will ensure that those service offerings are accessible and fit the day-to-day operations of the role.
    4. Fill in the template available on the next slide with each role’s engagement plan.

    Document results in the ACE Communications Deck.

    Example engagement plan: Developer

    2.2.1 30 Minutes per role

    Role: Developer
    Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
    Service Offering
    1. Onboarding
    2. Coaching
    3. Learning Facilitation
    1. Tooling Standards
    2. Learning Facilitation
    1. Communications Training
    2. Learning Facilitation
    1. Subject-Matter Expertise
    2. Coaching
    1. Knowledge Management
    Engagement Process
    1. Based on service request or need identified by dev. manager.
    2. Based on service request or need identified by dev. manager.
    3. Weekly mandatory community of practice meetings.
    1. When determined to have graduated to level 2, receive standard Agile tooling standards training.
    2. Weekly mandatory community of practice meetings.
    1. When determined to have graduated to level 3, receive standard Agile communications training.
    2. Weekly mandatory community of practice meetings
    1. Peer-based training on how to effectively self-organize.
    2. Based on service request or need identified by dev. manager.
    1. Review captured key learnings from last and have CoE review KPIs related to any area changed.

    Example engagement plan: Tester

    2.2.1 30 Minutes per role

    Role: Tester
    Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5
    Service Offering
    1. Onboarding
    2. Coaching
    1. Product Training
    2. Communications Training
    1. Communications Training
    2. Learning Facilitation
    1. Subject-Matter Expertise
    2. Coaching
    1. Tooling Standards
    2. Training
    3. Coaching
    Engagement Process
    1. Based on service request or need identified by dev. manager.
    1. Weekly mandatory community of practice meetings.
    2. Provide training on effective methods for communicating with development teams based on organizational best practices.
    1. When determined to have graduated to level 3, receive standard training based on organizational testing best practices. Weekly mandatory community of practice meetings.
    1. Peer-to-peer training with level 5 certified coach.
    2. Based on service request or need identified by dev. manager. .
    1. Periodic updates of organizational tooling standards based on community of practice results.
    2. Automation training.
    3. Provide coaching to level 1 developers on a rotating basis to develop facilitation skills.

    Example engagement plan: Product Owner

    2.2.1 30 Minutes per role

    Role: Product Owner
    Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
    Service Offering
    1. Onboarding
    2. Coaching
    1. Coaching
    2. Learning Facilitation
    1. Coaching
    2. Communications Training
    3. Learning Facilitation
    1. Coaching
    2. Learning Facilitation
    1. Coaching
    2. Learning Facilitation
    Engagement Process
    1. Provide onboarding materials for Agile product owners.
    2. Provide bi-weekly reviews and subsequent guidance at the end of retrospective processes.
    1. Provide monthly reviews and subsequent guidance based on retrospective results.
    2. Bi-weekly mandatory community of practice meetings
    1. When determined to have graduated to level 3, receive standard training based on organizational testing best practices.
    2. Bi-weekly mandatory community of practice meetings.
    1. Provide monthly reviews and subsequent guidance based on retrospective results.
    2. Bi-weekly mandatory community of practice meetings
    1. Provide quarterly reviews and subsequent guidance based on retrospective results.
    2. Bi-weekly mandatory community of practice meetings

    Phase 2, Step 3: Define metrics to measure success

    Phase 1

    1.1 Determine the vision of your ACE

    1.2 Define the service offerings of your ACE

    Phase 2

    2.1 Define an adoption plan for your Agile teams

    2.2 Create an ACE engagement plan

    2.3 Define metrics to measure success

    Phase 3

    3.1 Optimize the success of your ACE

    3.2 Plan change to enhance your Agile initiatives

    3.3 Conduct ongoing retrospectives of your ACE

    Activities:

    2.3.1 Define existing team-level metrics.

    2.3.2 Define metrics that align with your Agile business objectives.

    2.3.3 Define target ACE performance metrics.

    2.3.4 Define Agile adoption metrics.

    2.3.5 Consolidate your metrics for stakeholder impact.

    2.3.6 Use Info-Tech’s ACE Benefits Tracking Tool to monitor, evaluate, refine, and ensure continued business value.

    Outcomes:

    • Understand the importance of aligning with the functional expectations of your ACE customers.
    • Understand the relationship between engagement and continuous improvement.
    • Create an engagement plan for each level of adoption to standardize the way customers interact with the ACE.

    Craft metrics that will measure the success of your Agile teams

    Quantify measures that demonstrate the effectiveness of your ACE by establishing distinct metrics for each of your service offerings. This will ensure that you have full transparency over the outputs of your CoE and that your service offerings maintain relevance and are utilized.

    Questions to Ask

    1. What are leading indicators of improvements that directly affect the mandate of the CoE?
    2. How do you measure process efficiency and effectiveness?

    Creating meaningful metrics

    Specific

    Measureable

    Achievable

    Realistic

    Time-bound

    Follow the SMART framework when developing metrics for each service offering.

    Adhering to this methodology is a key component of the lean management methodology. This framework will help you avoid establishing general metrics that aren’t relevant.

    "It’s not about telling people what they are doing wrong. It’s about constantly steering everyone on the team in the direction of success, and never letting any individual compromise the progress of the team toward success." – Mary Poppendieck, qtd. in “Questioning Servant Leadership”

    For important advice on how to avoid the many risks associated with metrics, refer to Info-Tech’s Select and Use SDLC Metrics Effectively.

    Ensure your metrics are addressing criteria from different levels of stakeholders and enterprise context

    There will be a degree of overlap between the metrics from your business objectives, service offerings, and existing Agile teams. This is a positive thing. If a metric can speak to multiple benefits it is that much more powerful in commuting successes to your key stakeholders.

    Existing metrics

    Business objective metrics

    Service offering metrics

    Agile adoption metrics

    Finding points of overlap means that you have multiple stakeholders with a vested interest in the positive trend of a specific metric. These consolidated metrics will be fundamental for your CoE as they will help build consensus through communicating the success of the ACE in a common language for a diverse audience.

    Activity: Define existing team-level metrics

    2.3.1 1 Hour

    Input

    • Current metrics

    Output

    • Service offerings categorized within adoption model

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • Team
    1. Gather any metrics related documentation that you collected during your requirements gathering in Phase 1.
    2. Collect team-level metrics for your existing Agile teams:
      • Examine outputs from any feedback mechanisms you have (satisfaction surveys, emails, existing SLAs, burndown charts, resourcing costs, licensing costs per sprint, etc.).
      • Look at historical trends and figures when available. Be careful of frequent anomalies as these may indicate a root cause that needs to be addressed.
      • Explore the definition of specific metrics across different functional teams to ensure consistency of measurement and reporting.
    Team Objective Expected Benefits Metrics
    Improve productivity
    • Improve transparency with business decisions
    • Team burndown and velocity
    • Number of releases per milestone
    Increase team morale and motivation
    • Teams are engaged and motivated to develop new opportunities to deliver more value quicker.
    • Team satisfaction with Agile environment
    • Degree of engagement in ceremonies
    Improve transparency with business decisions
    • Teams are engaged and motivated to develop new opportunities to deliver more value quicker.
    • Stakeholder satisfaction with completed product
    • Number of revisions to products in demonstrations

    Activity: Define metrics that align with your Agile business objectives

    2.3.2 1 Hour

    Input

    • Organizational business objectives from Phase 1

    Output

    • Metrics aligned to organizational business objectives

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • ACE
    1. List the business objectives that you determined in 1.1.2.
    2. Create a shortlist of expected benefits from those business objectives. These will help to drive metrics that align with the intended purpose of completing those business objectives, and affirm they are aligned to realizable benefits.
    3. Define metrics that speak to the benefits of your business objectives. While engaging in this process, ensure to document the collection method for each metrics.
    Business Objectives Expected Benefits Metrics
    Decrease time-to-market of product releases
    • Faster feedback from customers.
    • Increased customer satisfaction.
    • Competitive advantage.
    Decrease time-to-market of product releases
    • Alignment to organizational best practices.
    • Improved team productivity.
    • Greater collaboration across functional teams.
    • Policy and practice adherence and acknowledgement
    • Number of requests for ACE services
    • Number of suggestions to improve Agile best practices and ACE operations

    Activity: Define target ACE performance metrics

    2.3.3 1 Hour

    Input

    • Service offerings
    • Satisfaction surveys
    • Usage rates

    Output

    • CoE performance metrics

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • ACE
    1. Define metrics to measure the success of each of your service offerings.
    2. Create a shortlist of expected benefits from those business objectives. These will help to drive metrics that align with the intended purpose of those service offerings, and affirm they are aligned to realizable benefits.
    3. Define metrics that speak to the benefits of your service offerings.
    4. Compare these to your team performance metrics.
    Service Offering Expected Benefits Metrics
    Knowledge management
    • Comprehensive knowledgebase that accommodates various company products and office locations.
    • Easily accessible resources.
    • Number of practices extracted from ACE and utilized
    • Frequency of updates to knowledgebase
    Tooling standards
    • Tools adhere to company policies, security guidelines, and regulations.
    • Improved support of tools and technologies.
    • Tools integrate and function well with enterprise systems.
    • Number of teams and functional groups using standardized tools
    • Number of supported standardized tools
    • Number of new tools added to the standards list
    • Number of tools removed from standards list

    Activity: Define Agile adoption metrics

    2.3.4 1 Hour

    Input

    • Agile adoption model

    Output

    • Agile adoption metrics
    1. Define metrics to measure the success of each of your service offerings.
    2. Create a shortlist of expected benefits from those business objectives. These will help to drive metrics that align with the intended purpose of those service offerings, and affirm they are aligned to realizable benefits.
    3. Define metrics that speak to the benefits of your service offerings.
    4. It is possible that you will need to adjust these metrics after baselines are established when you begin to operate the ACE. Keep this in mind moving forward.
    Adoption attributes Expected Benefits Metrics
    Team organization
    • Acquisition of the appropriate roles and skills to successfully deliver products.
    • Degree of flexibility to adjust team compositions on a per project basis
    Team coordination
    • Ability to successfully undertake large and complex projects involving multiple functional groups.
    • Number of ceremonies involving teams across functional groups
    Business alignment
    • Increased delivery of business value from process optimizations.
    • Number of business-objective metrics surpassing targets
    Coaching
    • Teams are regularly trained with new and better best practices.
    • Number of coaching and training requests
    Empowerment
    • Teams can easily and quickly modify processes to improve productivity without following a formal, rigorous process.
    • Number of implemented changes from team retrospectives
    Failure tolerance
    • Stakeholders trust teams will adjust when failures occur during a project.
    • Degree of stakeholder trust to address project issues quickly and effectively

    Activity: Consolidate your metrics for stakeholder impact

    2.3.5 30 Minutes

    Input

    • New and existing Agile metrics

    Output

    • Consolidated Agile metrics

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • ACE
    1. Take all the metrics defined from the previous activities and compare them as a group.
    2. If there are overlapping metrics that are measuring similar outcomes or providing similar benefits, see if there is a way to merge them together so that a single metric can report outcomes to multiple stakeholders. This reduces the amount of resources invested in metrics gathering and helps to show consensus or alignment between multiple stakeholder interests.
    3. Compare these to your existing Agile metrics, and explore ways to consolidate existing metrics that are established with some of your new metrics. Established metrics are trusted and if they can be continued it can be viewed as beneficial from a consensus and consistency perspective to your stakeholders.

    Activity: Use Info-Tech’s ACE Benefits Tracking Tool to monitor, evaluate, refine, and ensure continued business value

    2.3.6 1 Hour

    Purpose

    The CoE governance team can use this tool to take ownership of the project’s benefits, track progress, and act on any necessary changes to address gaps. In the long term, it can be used to identify whether the team is ahead, on track, or lagging in terms of benefits realization.

    Steps

    1. Enter your identified metrics from the following activities into the ACE Benefits Tracking Tool.
    2. Input your baselines from your data collection (Phase 3) and a goal value for each metric.
    3. Document the results at key intervals as defined by the tool.
    4. Use the summary report to identify metrics that are not tracking well for root cause analysis and communicate with key stakeholders the outcomes of your Agile Center of Excellence based on your communication schedule from Phase 3, Step 3.

    INFO-TECH DELIVERABLE

    Download the ACE Benefits Tracking Tool.

    Checkpoint: Are you ready to operate your ACE?

    Phase 2

    2.1 Define an adoption plan for your Agile teams

    2.2 Create an ACE engagement plan

    2.3 Define metrics to measure success

    Phase 3

    3.1 Optimize the success of your ACE

    3.2 Plan change to enhance your Agile initiatives

    3.3 Conduct ongoing retrospectives of your ACE

    Self Auditing Guidelines

    • Have you categorized your ACE service offerings within Info-Tech’s Agile adoption model?
    • Have you formalized engagement plans to standardize the access to your service offerings?
    • Do you understand the function of learning events and their criticality to the function of the ACE?
    • Do you understand the key attributes of Agile adoption and how social capital leads to optimized value delivery?
    • Have you defined metrics for different goals (adoption, effective service offerings, business objectives) of the ACE?
    • Do your defined metrics align to the SMART framework?

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    2.1.1 Further categorize your use cases within the Agile adoption model

    Our analyst team will help you categorize the Centers of Excellence service offerings within Info-Tech’s Agile adoption model to help standardize the way your organization engages with the Center of Excellence.

    2.2.1 Create an engagement plan for each level of adoption

    Our analyst team will help you structure engagement plans for each role within your Agile environment to provide a standardized pathway to personal development and consistency in practice.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    2.3.2 Define metrics that align with your Agile business objectives

    Our analysts will walk you through defining a set of metrics that align with your Agile business objectives identified in Phase 1 of the blueprint so the CoEs monitoring function can ensure ongoing alignment during operation.

    2.3.3 Define target ACE performance metrics

    Our analysts will walk you through defining a set of metrics that monitors how successful the ACE has been at providing its services so that business and IT stakeholders can ensure the effectiveness of the ACE.

    2.3.4 Define Agile adoption metrics

    Our analyst team will help you through defining a set of metrics that aligns with your organization’s fit of the Agile adoption model in order to provide a mechanism to track the progress of Agile teams maturing in capability and organizational trust.

    Phase 3

    Operationalize Your Agile Center of Excellence

    Spread Best Practices With an Agile Center of Excellence

    Operate your ACE to drive optimized value from your Agile teams

    The final step is to engage in monitoring of your metrics program to identify areas for improvement. Using metrics as a driver for operating your ACE will allow you to identify and effectively manage needed change, as well as provide you with the data necessary to promote outcomes to your stakeholders to ensure the long-term viability of the ACE within your organization.

    Phase 1 - Strategically Align the CoE

    Create strategic alignment between the CoE and the organization’s goals, objectives, and vision. This alignment translates into the CoE mandate intended to enhance the way Agile will enable teams to meet business objectives.

    Phase 2 - Standardize the CoEs Service Offerings

    Build an engagement plan based on a standardized adoption model to ensure your CoE service offerings are accessible and consistent across the organization. Create and consolidate key performance indicators to measure the CoEs utility and whether or not the expected value is being translated to tangible results.

    Phase 3 - Operate the CoE

    Operate the CoE to provide service offerings to Agile teams, identify improvements to optimize the function of your Agile teams, and effectively manage and communicate change so that teams can grow within the Agile adoption model and optimize value delivery both within your Agile environment and across functions.

    Phase 3 outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 3: Operate the CoE

    Proposed Time to Completion (in weeks): Variable depending on communication plan

    Step 3.1: Optimize the success of your ACE

    Start with an analyst kick off call:

    • Conduct a baseline assessment of your Agile environment.

    Then complete these activities…

    3.1.1 Use Info-Tech’s ACE Satisfaction Survey to help establish your baseline.

    3.1.2 Use Info-Tech’s CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool to measure the maturity level of your ACE.

    3.1.3 Prioritize ACE actions by monitoring your metrics.

    Step 3.2: Plan change to enhance your Agile initiatives

    Start with an analyst kick off call:

    • Interface with the ACE with your change management function.

    Then complete these activities…

    3.2.1 Assess the interaction and communication points of your Agile teams.

    3.2.2 Determine the root cause of each metric falling short of expectations.

    3.2.3 Brainstorm solutions to identified issues.

    3.2.4 Review your metrics program.

    3.2.5 Create a communication plan for change.

    Step 3.3: Conduct ongoing retrospectives of your ACE

    Finalize phase deliverable:

    • Build a communications deck for key stakeholders.

    Then complete these activities…

    3.3.1 Use the outputs from your metrics tracking tool to communicate progress.

    3.3.2 Summarize adjustments in areas where the ACE fell short.

    3.3.3 Review the effectiveness of your service offerings.

    3.3.4 Evaluate your ACE Maturity.

    3.3.5 Use Info-Tech’s ACE Communications Deck to deliver your outcomes to the key stakeholders.

    Phase 3 Results & Insights:

    Inject improvements into your Agile environment with operational excellence. Plan changes and communicate them effectively, monitor outcomes on a regular basis, and keep stakeholders in the loop to ensure that their interests are being looked after to ensure long-term viability of the CoE.

    Phase 3, Step 1: Optimize the success of your ACE

    Phase 1

    1.1 Determine the vision of your ACE

    1.2 Define the service offerings of your ACE

    Phase 2

    2.1 Define an adoption plan for your Agile teams

    2.2 Create an ACE engagement plan

    2.3 Define metrics to measure success

    Phase 3

    3.1 Optimize the success of your ACE

    3.2 Plan change to enhance your Agile initiatives

    3.3 Conduct ongoing retrospectives of your ACE

    Tools:

    3.1.1 Use Info-Tech’s ACE Satisfaction Survey to help establish your baseline.

    3.1.2 Use Info-Tech’s CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool to measure the maturity level of your ACE.

    3.1.3 Prioritize ACE actions by monitoring your metrics.

    Outcomes:

    • Conduct a baseline assessment of your ACE to measure against using a variety of data sources, including interviews, satisfaction surveys, and historical data.
    • Use the Benefits Tracking Tool to start monitoring the outcomes of the ACE and to keep track of trends.

    Ensure the CoE is able to collect the necessary data to measure success

    Establish your collection process to ensure that the CoE has the necessary resources to collect metrics and monitor progress, that there is alignment on what data sources are to be used when collecting data, and that you know which stakeholder is interested in the outcomes of that metric.

    Responsibility

    • Does the CoE have enough manpower to collect the metrics and monitor them?
    • If automated through technology, is it clear who is responsible for its function?

    Source of metric

    • Is the method of data collection standardized so that multiple people could collect the data in the same way?

    Impacted stakeholder

    • Do you know which stakeholder is interested in this metric?
    • How often should the interested stakeholder be informed of progress?

    Intended function

    • What is the expected benefit of increasing this metric?
    • What does the metric intend to communicate to the stakeholder?

    Conduct a baseline assessment of your ACE to measure success

    Establishing the baseline performance of the ACE allows you to have a reasonable understanding of the impact it is having on meeting business objectives. Use user satisfaction surveys, stakeholder interviews, and any current metrics to establish a concept of how you are performing now. Setting new metrics can be a difficult task so it is important to collect as much current data as possible. After the metrics have been established and monitored for a period of time, you can revisit the targets you have set to ensure they are realistic and usable.

    Without a baseline, you cannot effectively:

    • Establish reasonable target metrics that reflect the performance of your Center of Excellence.
    • Identify, diagnose, and resolve any data that deviates from expected outcomes.
    • Measure ongoing business satisfaction given the level of service.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Invest the needed time to baseline your activities. These data points are critical to diagnose successes and failures of the CoE moving forward, and you will need them to be able to refine your service offerings as business conditions or user expectations change. While it may seem like something you can breeze past, the investment is critical.

    Use a variety of sources to get the best picture of your current state; a combination of methods provides the richest insight

    Interviews

    What to do:

    • Conduct interviews (or focus groups) with key influencers and Agile team members.

    Benefits:

    • Data comes from key business decision makers.
    • Identify what is top of mind for your top-level stakeholders.
    • Ask follow-up questions for detail.

    Challenges:

    • This will only provide a very high-level view.
    • Interviewer biases may skew the results.

    Surveys

    What to do:

    • Distribute an Agile-specific stakeholder satisfaction survey. The survey should be specific to identify factors of your current environment.

    Benefits:

    • Every end user/business stakeholder will be able to provide feedback.
    • The survey will be simple to develop and distribute.

    Challenges:

    • Response rates can be low if stakeholders do not understand the value in their opinions.

    Historical Data

    What to do:

    • Collect and analyze existing Agile data such as past retrospectives, Agile team metrics, etc.

    Benefits:

    • Get a full overview of current service offerings, past issues, and current service delivery.
    • Allows you to get an objective view of what is really going on within your Agile teams.

    Challenges:

    • Requires a significant time investment and analytical skills to analyze the data and generate insights on business satisfaction and needs.

    Use Info-Tech’s ACE Satisfaction Survey to help establish your baseline

    3.1.1 Baseline satisfaction survey

    Purpose

    Conduct a user satisfaction survey prior to setting your baseline for your ACE. This will include high-level questions addressing your overall Agile environment and questions addressing teams’ current satisfaction with their processes and technology.

    Steps

    1. Modify the satisfaction survey template to suit your organization and the service offerings you have defined for the Agile Center of Excellence.
    2. Distribute the satisfaction survey to any users who are expected to interface with the ACE.
    3. Document the results and communicate them with the relevant key stakeholders.
    4. Combine these results with historical data points (if available) and stakeholder interviews to get a holistic picture of your current state.

    INFO-TECH DELIVERABLE

    Download the ACE Satisfaction Survey.

    Use Info-Tech’s CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool to measure the maturity level of your ACE

    3.1.2 CoE maturity assessment

    Purpose

    Assessing your ACEs maturity lets you know where they currently are and what to track to get them to the next step. This will help ensure your ACE is following good practices and has the appropriate mechanisms in place to serve your stakeholders.

    Steps

    1. Download the CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool to assess the maturity of your ACE.
    2. Complete the assessment tool with all members of your ACE team to determine your maturity score.
    3. Document the results and communicate them with the relevant key stakeholders.
    4. Combine these results with historical data points (if available) and stakeholder interviews to get a holistic picture of your ACE maturity level.

    Document results in the ACE Communications Deck.

    INFO-TECH DELIVERABLE

    Download the CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool.

    Activity: Prioritize ACE actions by monitoring your metrics

    3.1.3 Variable time commitment

    Input

    • Metrics from ACE Benefits Tracking Tool

    Output

    • Prioritized actions for the ACE

    Materials

    • ACE Benefits Tracking Tool

    Participants

    • ACE team
    1. Review your ACE Benefits Tracking Tool periodically (at the end of sprint cycles, quarterly, etc.) and document metrics that are trending or actively falling short of goals or expectations.
    2. Take the documented list and have the ACE staff consider what actions or decisions can be prioritized to help mend the identified gaps. Look for any trends that could potentially speak to a larger problem or a specific aspect of the ACE or the organizational Agile environment that is not functioning as expected.
    3. Take the opportunity to review metrics that are also tracking above expected value to see if there are any lessons learned that can be extended to other ACE service offerings (e.g. effective engagement or communication strategies) so that the organization can start to learn what is effective and what is not based on their internal struggles and challenges. Spreading successes is just as important as identifying challenges in a CoE model.

    Phase 3, Step 2: Plan change to enhance your Agile initiatives

    Phase 1

    1.1 Determine the vision of your ACE

    1.2 Define the service offerings of your ACE

    Phase 2

    2.1 Define an adoption plan for your Agile teams

    2.2 Create an ACE engagement plan

    2.3 Define metrics to measure success

    Phase 3

    3.1 Optimize the success of your ACE

    3.2 Plan change to enhance your Agile initiatives

    3.3 Conduct ongoing retrospectives of your ACE

    Activities:

    3.2.1 Assess the interaction and communication points of your Agile teams.

    3.2.2 Determine the root cause of each metric falling short of expectations.

    3.2.3 Brainstorm solutions to identified issues

    3.2.4 Review your metrics program.

    3.2.5 Create a communication plan for change.

    Outcomes:

    • Understand how your existing change management process interfaces with the Center of Excellence.
    • Identify issues and ideate solutions to metrics falling short of expectations.
    • Create a communication plan to prepare groups for any necessary change.

    Manage the adaptation of teams as they adopt Agile capabilities

    As Agile spreads, be cognizant of your cultural tolerance to change and its ability to deliver on such change. Change will happen more frequently and continuously, and there may be conceptual (change tolerance) or capability (delivery tolerance) roadblocks along the way that will need to be addressed.

    The Agile adoption model will help to graduate both the tolerance to change and tolerance to deliver over time. As your level of competency to deliver change increases, organizational tolerance to change, especially amongst management, will increase as well. Remember that optimized value delivery comes from this careful balance of aptitude and trust.

    Tolerance to change

    Tolerance to change refers to the conceptual capacity of your people to consume and adopt change. Change tolerance may become a barrier to success because teams might be too engrained with current structures and processes and find any changes too disruptive and uncomfortable.

    Tolerance to deliver

    Tolerance to deliver refers to the capability to deliver on expected change. While teams may be tolerant, they may not have the necessary capacity, skills, or resources to deliver the necessary changes successfully. The ACE can help solve this problem with training and coaching, or possibly by obtaining outside help where necessary.

    Understand how the ACE interfaces with your current change management process

    As the ACE absorbs best practices and identifies areas for improvement, a change management process should be established to address the implementation and sustainability of change without introducing significant disruptions and costs.

    To manage a continuously changing environment, your ACE will need to align and coordinate with organizational change management processes. This process should be capable of evaluating and incorporating multiple change initiatives continuously.

    Desired changes will need to be validated, and localized adaptations will need to be disseminated to the larger organization, and current state policy and procedures will need to be amended as the adoption of Agile spreads and capabilities increase.

    The goal here is to have the ACE governance group identify and interface with parties relevant to successfully implementing any specific change.

    INFO-TECH RELATED RESEARCH:

    Strategy and Leadership: Optimize Change Management

    Optimize your stakeholder management process to identify, prioritize, and effectively manage key stakeholders.

    Where should your Agile change requests come from?

    Changes to the services, structure, or engagement model of your ACE can be triggered from various sources in your organization. You will see that proposed changes may be requested with the best intentions; however, the potential impacts they may have to other areas of the organization can be significant. Consult all sources of ACE change requests to obtain a consensus that your change requests will not deteriorate the ACEs performance and use.

    ACE Governance

    • Sources of ACE Change Requests
      • ACE Policies/Stakeholders
        • Triggers for Change:
          • Changes in business and functional group objectives.
          • Dependencies and legacy policies and procedures.
      • ACE Customers
        • Triggers for Change:
          • Retrospectives and post-mortems.
          • Poor fit of best practices to projects.
      • Metrics
        • Triggers for Change:
          • Performance falling short of expectations.
          • Lack of alignment with changing objectives.
      • Tools and Technologies
        • Triggers for Change:
          • New or enhanced tools and technologies.
          • Changes in development and technology standards.

    Note: Each source of ACE change requests may require a different change management process to evaluate and implement the change.

    Activity: Assess the interaction and communication points of your Agile teams

    3.2.1 1.5 Hours

    Input

    • Understanding of team and organization structure

    Output

    • Current assessment of organizational design

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • Development team
    1. Identify everyone who is directly or indirectly involved in projects completed by Agile teams. This can include those that are:
    • Informed of a project’s progress.
    • Expected to interface with the Agile team for solution delivery (e.g. DevOps).
    • Impacted by the success of the delivered solutions.
    • Responsible for the removal of impediments faced by the Agile team.
  • Indicate how each role interacts with the others and how frequently these interactions occur for a typical project. Do this by drawing a diagram on a whiteboard using labelled arrows to indicate types and frequency of interactions.
  • Identify the possible communication, collaboration, and alignment challenges the team will face when working with other groups.
  • Agile Team n
    Group Type of Interaction Potential challenges
    Operations
    • Release management
    • Past challenges transitioning to DevOps.
    • Communication barrier as an impediment.
    PMO
    • Planning
    • Product owner not located with team in organization.
    • PMO still primarily waterfall; need Agile training/coaching

    Activity: Determine the root cause of each metric falling short of expectations

    3.2.2 30 Minutes per metric

    Input

    • Metrics from Benefits Tracking Tool

    Output

    • Root causes to issues

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • ACE team
    1. Take each metric from the ACE Benefits Tracking Tool that is lagging behind or has missed expectations and conduct an analysis of why it is performing that way.
    2. Conduct individual webbing sessions to clarify the issues. The goal is to drive out the reasons why these issues are present or why scaling Agile may introduce additional challenges.
    3. Share and discuss these findings with the entire team.

    Example:

    • Lack of best-practice documentation
      • Why?
        • Knowledge siloed within teams
        • No centralized repository for best practices
          • Why?
            • No mechanisms to share between teams
              • Why? Root causes
                • Teams are not sharing localized adaptations
                • CoE is not effectively monitoring team communications
            • Access issues at team level to wiki
              • Why? Root causes
                • Administration issues with best-practice wiki
                • Lack of ACE visibility into wiki access

    Activity: Brainstorm solutions to identified issues

    3.2.3 30 Minutes per metric

    Input

    • Root causes of issues

    Output

    • Fixes and solutions to scaling Agile issues

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • Development team
    1. Using the results from your root-cause analysis, brainstorm potential solutions to the identified problems. Frame your brainstorming within the following perspectives: people, process, and technology. Map these solutions using the matrix below.
    2. Synthesize your ideas to create a consolidated list of initiatives.
      1. Highlight the solutions that can address multiple issues.
      2. Collaborate on how solutions can be consolidated into a single initiative.
    3. Write your synthesized solutions on sticky notes.
    SOLUTION CATEGORY
    People Process Technology
    ISSUES Poor face-to-face communication
    Lack of best-practice documentation

    Engage those teams affected by change early to ensure they are prepared

    Strategically managing change is an essential component to ensure that the ACE achieves its desired function. If the change that comes with adopting Agile best practices is going to impact other functions and change their expected workflows, ensure they are well prepared and the benefits for said changes are clearly communicated to them.

    Necessary change may be identified proactively (dependency assessments, system integrity, SME indicates need, etc.) or reactively (through retrospectives, discussions, completing root-cause analyses, etc.), but both types need to be handled the same way – through proper planning and communication with the affected parties.

    Plan any necessary change

    Understand the points where other groups will be affected by the adoption of Agile practices and recognize the potential challenges they may face. Plan changes to accommodate interactions between these groups without roadblocks or impediments.

    Communicate the change

    Structure a communication plan based on your identified challenges and proposed changes so that groups are well prepared to make the necessary adjustments to accommodate Agile workflows.

    Review and modify your metrics and baselines to ensure they are achievable in changing environments

    Consider the possible limitations that will exist from environmental complexities when measuring your Agile teams. Dependencies and legacy policies and procedures that pose a bottleneck to desired outcomes will need to be changed before teams can be measured justifiably. Take the time to ensure the metrics you crafted earlier are plausible in your current environment and there is not a need for transitional metrics.

    Are your metrics achievable?

    Specific

    Measureable

    Achievable

    • Adopting Agile is a journey, not just a destination. Ensure that the metrics a team is measured against reflect expectations for the team’s current level of Agile adoption and consider external dependencies that may limit their ability to achieve intended results.

    Realistic

    Time-bound

    Info-Tech Insight

    Use metrics as diagnostics, not as motivation. Teams will find ways to meet metrics they are measured by making sacrifices and taking unneeded risk to do so. To avoid dysfunction in your monitoring, use metrics as analytical tools to inform decision making, not as a yardstick for judgement.

    Activity: Review your metrics program

    3.2.4 Variable time commitment

    Input

    • Identified gaps
    • Agile team interaction points

    Output

    • ACE baselines
    • Past measurements

    Materials

    • ACE Benefits Tracking Tool

    Participants

    • ACE
    1. Now that you have identified gaps in your current state, see if those will have any impact on the achievability of your current metrics program.
    2. Review your root-cause analyses and brainstormed solutions, and hypothesize whether or not they will have any downstream impact to goal attainment. It is possible that there is no impact, but as cross-functional collaboration increases, the likelihood that groups will act as bottlenecks or impediments to expected performance will increase.
    3. Consider how any changes will impact the interaction points between teams based on the results from activity 3.2.1: Assess the interaction and communication points of your Agile teams. If there are too many negative impacts it may be a sign to re-consider the hypothesized solution to the problem and consider alternatives.
    4. In any cases where a metric has been altered, adjust its goal measurement to reflect its changes in the ACE Benefits Tracking Tool.

    Case study: Agile change at the GSA

    CASE STUDY

    Industry Government

    Source Navin Vembar, Agile Government Leadership

    Challenge

    The GSA is tasked with completed management of the Integrated Award Environment (IAE).

    • The IAE manages ten federal information technology systems that enable registering, searching, and applying for federal awards, as well as tracking them.
    • The IAE also manages the Federal Service Desk.

    The IAE staff had to find a way to break down the problem of modernization into manageable chunks that would demonstrate progress, but also had to be sure to capture a wide variety of user needs with the ability to respond to those needs throughout development.

    Had to work out the logistics of executing Agile change within the GSA, an agency that relies heavily on telework. In the case of modernization, they had a product owner in Florida while the development team was spread across the metro Washington, DC area.

    Solution

    Agile provided the ability to build incremental successes that allowed teams successful releases and built enthusiasm around the potential of adopting Agile practices offered.

    • GSA put in place an organization framework that allowed for planning of change at the portfolio level to enable the change necessary to allow for teams to execute tasks at the project level.
    • A four-year plan with incremental integration points allowed for larger changes on a quarterly basis while maintaining a bi-weekly sprint cycle.
    • They adopted IBM’s RTC tool for a Scrum board and on Adobe Connect for daily Scrum sessions to ensure transparency and effectiveness of outcomes across their collocated teams.

    Create a clear, concise communication plan

    Communication is key to avoid surprises and lost productivity created by the implementation of changes.

    User groups and the business need to be given sufficient notice of an impending change. Be concise, be comprehensive, and ensure that the message is reaching the right audience so that no one is blindsided and unable to deliver what is needed. This will allow them to make appropriate plans to accept the change, minimizing the impact of the change on productivity.

    Key Aspects of a Communication Plan

    • The method of communication (email, meetings, workshops, etc.).
    • The delivery strategy (who will deliver the message?).
    • The communication responsibility structure.
    • The communication frequency.
    • A feedback mechanism that allows you to review the effectiveness of your plan.
    • The message that you need to present.

    Communicating change

    • What is the change?
    • Why are we doing it?
    • How are we going to go about it?
    • What are we trying to achieve?
    • How often will we be updated?

    (Cornelius & Associates, The Qualities of Leadership: Leading Change)

    Apply the following principles to enhance the clarity of your message

    1. Be Consistent
    • "This is important because..."
      • The core message must be consistent regardless of audience, channel, or medium.
      • Test your communication and obtain feedback before delivering your message.
      • A lack of consistency can be perceived as deception.
  • Be Clear
    • "This means..."
      • Say what you mean and mean what you say.
      • Choice of language is important.
      • Don’t use jargon.
  • Be Relevant
    • "This affects you because..."
      • Talk about what matters to the audience.
      • Talk about what matters to the change initiative.
      • Tailor the details of the message to each audience’s specific concerns.
      • Communicate truthfully; do not make false promises or hide bad news.
  • Be Concise
    • "In summary..."
      • Keep communication short and to the point so key messages are not lost in the noise.
  • Activity: Create a communication plan for change

    3.2.5 1.5 Hours

    Input

    • Desired messages
    • Stakeholder list

    Output

    • Communication plan

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • CoE
    1. Define the audience(s) for your communications. Consider who needs to be the audience of your different communication events and how it will impact them.
    2. Identify who the messenger will be to deliver the message.
    3. Identify your communication methods. Decide on the methods you will use to deliver each communication event. Your delivery method may vary depending on the audience it is targeting.
    4. Establish a timeline for communication releases. Set dates for your communication events. This can be recurring (weekly, monthly, etc.) or one-time events.
    5. Determine what the content of the message must include. Use the guidelines on the following slide to ensure the message is concise and impactful.

    Note: It is important to establish a feedback mechanism to ensure that the communication has been effective in communicating the change to the intended audiences. This can be incorporated into your ACE satisfaction surveys.

    Audience Messenger Format Timing Message
    Operations Development team Email
    • Monthly (major release)
    • Ad hoc (minor release and fixes)
    Build ready for release
    Key stakeholders CIO Meeting
    • Monthly unless dictated otherwise
    Updates on outcomes from past two sprint cycles

    Phase 3, Step 3: Conduct ongoing retrospectives of your ACE

    Phase 1

    1.1 Determine the vision of your ACE

    1.2 Define the service offerings of your ACE

    Phase 2

    2.1 Define an adoption plan for your Agile teams

    2.2 Create an ACE engagement plan

    2.3 Define metrics to measure success

    Phase 3

    3.1 Optimize the success of your ACE

    3.2 Plan change to enhance your Agile initiatives

    3.3 Conduct ongoing retrospectives of your ACE

    Activities/Tools:

    3.3.1 Use the outputs from your metrics tracking tool to communicate progress.

    3.3.2 Summarize adjustments in areas where the ACE fell short.

    3.3.3 Re-conduct satisfaction surveys and compare against your baseline.

    3.3.4 Use Info-Tech’s CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool to baseline current practices

    3.3.5 Use Info-Tech’s ACE Communications Deck to deliver your outcomes to the key stakeholders.

    Outcomes:

    • Conduct a retrospective of your ACE to enable the continuous improvement of your Agile program.
    • Structure a communications deck to communicate with stakeholders the outcomes from introducing the ACE to the organization.

    Reflect on your ACEs performance to lead the way to enterprise agility

    After functioning for a period of time, it is imperative to review the function of your ACE to ensure its continual alignment and see in what ways it can improve.

    At the end of the year, take the time to deliberately review and discuss:

    1. The effectiveness and use of your ACEs service offerings.
    2. What went well or wrong during the ACEs operation.
    3. What can be done differently to improve reach, usability, and effectiveness.
    4. Bring together Agile teams and discuss the processes they follow and inquire about suggestions for improvement.

    What is involved?

    • Use your metrics program to diagnose areas of issue and success. The diagnostic value of your metrics can help lead conversations with your Agile teams when attempting to inquire about suggestions for improvement.
    • Leverage your satisfaction surveys from the creation of your ACE and compare them against satisfaction surveys run after a year of operation. What are the lessons learned between then and now?
    • While it is primarily conducted by the ACE team, keep in mind it is a collaborative function and should involve all members, including Agile teams, product owners, Scrum masters, etc.

    Communicating with your key influencers is vital to ensure long-term operation of the ACE

    To ensure the long-term viability of your ACE and that your key influencers will continue funding, you need to demonstrate the ROI the Center of Excellence has provided.

    The overlying purpose of your ACE is to effectively align your Agile teams with corporate objectives. This means that there have to be communicable benefits that point to the effort and resources invested being valuable to the organization. Re-visit your prioritized stakeholder list and get ready to show them the impact the ACE has had on business outcomes.

    Communication with stakeholders is the primary method of building and developing a lasting relationship. Correct messaging can build bridges and tear down barriers, as well as soften opposition and bolster support.

    This section will help you to prepare an effective communication piece that summarizes the metrics stakeholders are interested in, as well as some success stories or benefits that are not communicable through metrics to provide extra context to ongoing successes of the ACE.

    INFO-TECH RELATED RESEARCH:

    Strategy and Leadership: Manage Stakeholder Relations

    Optimize your stakeholder management process to identify, prioritize, and effectively manage key stakeholders.

    Involve key stakeholders in your retrospectives to justify the funding for your ACE

    Those who fund the ACE have a large influence on the long-term success of your ACE. If you have not yet involved your stakeholders, you need to re-visit your organizational funding model for the ACE and ensure that your key stakeholders include the key decision makers for your funding. While they may have varying levels of interest and desires for granularity of data reporting, they need to at least be informed on a high level and kept as champions of the ACE so that there are no roadblocks to the long-term viability of this program.

    Keep this in mind as the ACE begins to demonstrate success, as it is not uncommon to have additional members added to your funding model as your service scales, especially in the chargeback models.

    As new key influencers are included, the ACEs governing group must ensure that collective interests may align and that more priorities don’t lead to derailment.

    The image shows a matrix. The matrix is labelled with Involvement at the bottom, and Power on the left side, and has the upper left quadrant labelled Keep Satisfied, the upper right quadrant labelled Key players, the lower right quadrant labelled Keep informed, and the lower left quadrant labelled Minimal effort. In the matric, there are several roles shown, with roles such as CFO, Apps Director, Funding Group, and CIO highlighted in the Key players section.

    Use the outputs from your metrics tracking tool to communicate progress

    3.3.1 1 Hour

    Use the ACE Benefits Tracking Tool to track the progress of your Agile environment to monitor whether or not the ACE is having a positive impact on the business’ ability to meet its objectives. The outputs will allow you to communicate incremental benefits that have been realized and point towards positive trends that will ensure the long-term buy-in of your key influencers.

    For communication purposes, use this tool to:

    • Re-visit who the impacted or interested stakeholders are so you can tailor your communications to be as impactful as possible for each key influencer of the ACE.

    The image shows a screen capture of the Agile CoE Metrics Tracking sheet.

    • Collate the benefits of the current projects undertaken by the Center of Excellence to give an overall recap of the ACEs impact.

    The image is a screen capture of the Summary Report sheet.

    Communicate where the ACE fell short

    Part of communicating the effectiveness of your ACE is to demonstrate that it is able to remedy projects and processes when they fall short of expectations and brainstorm solutions that effectively address these challenges. Take the opportunity to summarize where results were not as expected, and the ways in which the ACE used its influence or services to drive a positive outcome from a problem diagnosis. Stakeholders do not want a sugar-coated story – they want to see tangible results based on real scenarios.

    Summarizing failures will demonstrate to key influencers that:

    • You are not cherry-picking positive metrics to report and that the ACE faced challenges that it was able to overcome to drive positive business outcomes.
    • You are being transparent with the successes and challenges faced by the ACE, fostering increased trust within your stakeholders regarding the capabilities of Agile.
    • Resolution mechanisms are working as intended, successfully building failure tolerance and trust in change management policies and procedures.

    Activity: Summarize adjustments in areas where the ACE fell short

    3.3.2 15 Minutes per metric

    Input

    • Diagnosed problems from tracking tool
    • Root-cause analyses

    Output

    • Summary of change management successes

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • ACE
    1. Create a list of items from the ACE Benefits Tracking Tool that fell short of expectations or set goals.
    2. For each point, create a brief synopsis of the root-cause analysis completed and summarize the brainstormed solution and its success in remedying the issue. If this process is not complete, create a to-date summary of any progress.
    3. Choose two to three pointed success stories from this list that will communicate broad success to your set of stakeholders.
    Name of metric that fell short
    Baseline measurement 65% of users satisfied with ACE services.
    Goal measurement 80% of users satisfied with ACE services.
    Actual measurement 70% of users satisfied with ACE services.
    Results of root-cause analysis Onboarding was not extensive enough; teams were unaware of some of the services offered, rendering them unsatisfied.
    Proposed solution Revamp onboarding process to include capability map of service offered.
    Summary of success TBD

    Re-conduct surveys with the ACE Satisfaction Survey to review the effectiveness of your service offerings

    3.3.3 Re-conduct satisfaction surveys and compare against your baseline

    Purpose

    This satisfaction survey will give you a template to follow to monitor the effectiveness of your ACEs defined service offerings. The goal is to understand what worked, and what did not, so you can add, retract, or modify service offerings where necessary.

    Steps

    1. Re-use the satisfaction survey to measure the effectiveness of the service offerings. Add questions regarding specific service offerings where necessary.
    2. Cross-analyze your satisfaction survey with metrics tied to your service offerings to help understand the root cause of the issues.
    3. Use the root-cause analysis exercises from step 3.2 to find the root causes of issues.
    4. Create a set of recommendations to add, amend, or improve any existing service offerings.

    INFO-TECH DELIVERABLE

    Download the ACE Satisfaction Survey.

    Use Info-Tech’s CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool to baseline current practices

    3.3.4 ACE Maturity Assessment

    Purpose

    Assess your ACEs maturity by using Info-Tech’s CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool. Assessing your ACEs maturity lets you know where you currently are, and where to look for improvements. Note that your optimal Maturity Level will depend on organizational specifics (e.g. a small organization with a handful of Agile Teams can be less mature than a large organization with hundreds of Agile Teams).

    Steps

    1. Download the CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool to assess the maturity of your ACE.
    2. Complete the assessment tool with all members of your ACE team to determine your current Maturity score.
    3. Document the results in the ACE Communications Deck.

    Document results in the ACE Communications Deck.

    INFO-TECH DELIVERABLE

    Download the CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool.

    Use Info-Tech’s ACE Communications Deck to deliver your outcomes to the key stakeholders

    3.3.5 Structure communications to each of your key stakeholders

    Purpose

    The ACE Communications Deck will give you a template to follow to effectively communicate with your stakeholders and ensure the long-term viability of your Agile Center of Excellence. Fill in the slides as instructed and provide each stakeholder with a targeted view of the successes of the ACE.

    Steps

    1. Determine who your target audience is for the Communications Deck – you may desire to create one for each of your key stakeholders as they may have different sets of interests.
    2. Fill out the ACE Communications Deck with the suggested inputs from the exercises you have completed during this research set.
    3. Review communications with members of the ACE to ensure that there are no communicable benefits that have been missed or omitted in the deck.

    INFO-TECH DELIVERABLE

    Download the ACE Communications Deck.

    Summary of accomplishment

    Knowledge Gained

    • An understanding of social capital as the key driver for organizational Agile success, and how it optimizes the value delivery of your Agile teams.
    • Importance of flexible governance to balance the benefits of localized adaptation and centralized control.
    • Alignment of service offerings with both business objectives and functional expectations as critical to ensuring long-term engagement with service offerings.

    Processes Optimized

    • Knowledge management and transfer of Agile best practices to new or existing Agile teams.
    • Optimization of service offerings for Agile teams based on organizational culture and objectives.
    • Change request optimization via interfacing ACE functions with existing change management processes.
    • Communication planning to ensure transparency during cross-functional collaboration.

    Deliverables Completed

    • A set of service offerings offered by the Center of Excellence that are aligned with the business, Agile teams, and related stakeholders.
    • Engagement plans for Agile team members based on a standardized adoption model to access the ACEs service offerings.
    • A suite of Agile metrics to measure effectiveness of Agile teams, the ACE itself, and its ability to deliver positive outcomes.
    • A communications plan to help create cross-functional transparency over pending changes as Agile spreads.
    • A communications deck to communicate Agile goals, actions, and outcomes to key stakeholders to ensure long-term viability of the CoE.

    Research contributors and experts

    Paul Blaney, Technology Delivery Executive, Thought Leader and passionate Agile Advocate

    Paul has been an Agile practitioner since the manifesto emerged some 20 years ago, applying and refining his views through real life experience at several organizations from startups to large enterprises. He has recently completed the successful build out of the inaugural Agile Delivery Centre of Excellence at TD bank in Toronto.

    John Munro, President Scrum Masters Inc.

    John Munro is the President of Scrum Masters Inc., a software optimization professional services firm using Agile, Scrum, and Lean to help North American firms “up skill” their software delivery people and processes. Scrum Masters’ unique, highly collaborative “Master Mind” consulting model leverages Agile/Lean experts on a biweekly basis to solve clients’ technical and process challenges.

    Doug Birgfeld, Senior Partner Agile Wave

    Doug has been a leader in building great teams, Agile project management, and business process innovation for over 20 years. As Senior Partner and Chief Evangelist at Agile Wave, his mission is to educate and to learn from all those who care about effective government delivery, nationally.

    Related Info-Tech research

    Implement Agile Practices That Work

    Agile is a cultural shift. Don't just do Agile, be Agile.

    Enable Organization-Wide Collaboration by Scaling Agile

    Execute a disciplined approach to rolling out Agile methods in the organization.

    Improve Application Development Throughput

    Drive down your delivery time by eliminating development inefficiencies and bottlenecks while maintaining high quality.

    Implement DevOps Practices That Work

    Accelerate software deployment through Dev and Ops collaboration.

    Related Info-Tech research (continued)

    Maximize the Benefits from Enterprise Applications with a Center of Excellence

    Optimize your organization’s enterprise application capabilities with a refined and scalable methodology.

    Drive Efficiency and Agility with a Fit-for-Purpose Quality Management Program

    Be proactive; it costs exponentially more to fix a problem the longer it goes unnoticed.

    Optimize the Change Management Process

    Right-size your change management process.

    Improve Requirements Gathering

    Back to basics: great products are built on great requirements.

    Bibliography

    Ambler, Scott. “Agile Requirements Change Management.” Agile Modeling. Scott Amber + Associates, 2014. Web. 12 Apr. 2016.

    Ambler, Scott. “Center of Excellence (CoEs).” Disciplined Agile 2.0: A Process Decision Framework for Enterprise I.T. Scott Amber + Associates. Web. 01 Apr. 2016.

    Ambler, Scott. “Transforming From Traditional to Disciplined Agile Delivery.” Case Study: Disciplined Agile Delivery Adoption. Scott Amber + Associates, 2013. Web.

    Beers, Rick. “IT – Business Alignment Why We Stumble and the Path Forward.” Oracle Corporation, July 2013. Web.

    Cornelius & Associates. “The Qualities of Leadership: Leading Change.” Cornelius & Associates, n.d. Web.

    Craig, William et al. “Generalized Criteria and Evaluation Method for Center of Excellence: A Preliminary Report.” Carnegie Mellon University Research Showcase @ CMU – Software Engineering Institute. Dec. 2009. Web. 20 Apr. 2016.

    Forsgren, Dr. Nicole et al (2019), Accelerate: State of DevOps 2019, Google, https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/state-of-devops-2019.pdf

    Gerardi, Bart (2017), Agile Centers of Excellence, PMI Projectmanagement.com, https://www.projectmanagement.com/articles/405819/Agile-Centers-of-Excellence

    Gerardi, Bart (2017), Champions of Agile Adoption, PMI Projectmanagement.com, https://www.projectmanagement.com/articles/418151/Champions-of-Agile-Adoption

    Gerardi, Bart (2017), The Roles of an Agile COE, PMI Projectmanagement.com, https://www.projectmanagement.com/articles/413346/The-Roles-of-an-Agile-COE

    Hohl, P. et al. “Back to the future: origins and directions of the ‘Agile Manifesto’ – views of the originators.” Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development, vol. 6, no. 15, 2018. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40411-0...

    Kaltenecker, Sigi and Hundermark, Peter. “What Are Self-Organising Teams?” InfoQ. 18 July 2014. Web. 14 Apr. 2016.

    Kniberg, Henrik and Anderson Ivarsson. “Scaling Agile @ Spotify with Tribes, Squads, Chapters & Guilds.” Oct. 2012. Web. 30 Apr. 2016.

    Kumar, Alok et al. “Enterprise Agile Adoption: Challenges and Considerations.” Scrum Alliance. 30 Oct. 2014. Web. 30 May 2016.

    Levison, Mark. “Questioning Servant Leadership.” InfoQ, 4 Sept. 2008. Web. https://www.infoq.com/news/2008/09/servant_leadership/

    Linders, Ben. “Don't Copy the Spotify Model.” InfoQ.com. 6 Oct. 2016.

    Loxton, Matthew (June 1, 2011), CoP vs CoE – What’s the difference, and Why Should You Care?, Wordpress.com

    McDowell, Robert, and Bill Simon. In Search of Business Value: Ensuring a Return on Your Technology Investment. SelectBooks, 2010

    Novak, Cathy. “Case Study: Agile Government and the State of Maine.” Agile Government Leadership, n.d. Web.

    Pal, Nirmal and Daniel Pantaleo. “Services are the Language and Building Blocks of an Agile Enterprise.” The Agile Enterprise: Reinventing your Organization for Success in an On-Demand World. 6 Dec. 2015. Springer Science & Business Media.

    Rigby, Darrell K. et al (2018), Agile at Scale, Harvard Business Review, https://hbr.org/2018/05/agile-at-scale

    Scaledagileframework.com, Create a Lean-Agile Center of Excellence, Scaled Agile, Inc, https://www.scaledagileframework.com/lace/

    Shepley, Joe. “8 reasons COEs fail (Part 2).” Agile Ramblings, 22 Feb. 2010. https://joeshepley.com/2010/02/22/8-reasons-coes-fail-part-2/

    Stafford, Jan. “How upper management misconceptions foster Agile failures.” TechTarget. Web. 07 Mar. 2016.

    Taulli, Tom (2020), RPA Center Of Excellence (CoE): What You Need To Know For Success, Forbes.com, https://www.forbes.com/sites/tomtaulli/2020/01/25/rpa-center-of-excellence-coe-what-you-need-to-know-for-success/#24364620287a

    Telang, Mukta. “The CMMI Agile Adoption Model.” ScrumAlliance. 29 May 2015. Web. 15 Apr. 2016.

    VersionOne. “13th Annual State of Agile Report.” VersionOne. 2019. Web.

    Vembar, Navin. “Case Study: Agile Government and the General Services Administration (Integrated Award Environment).” Agile Government Leadership, n.d. Web.

    Wenger, E., R. A. McDermott, et al. (2002), Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge, Harvard Business Press.

    Wenger, E., White, N., Smith, J.D. Digital Habitats; Stewarding Technology for Communities. Cpsquare (2009).

    Optimize the Current Testing Process for Enterprise Mobile Applications

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}404|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Testing, Deployment & QA
    • Parent Category Link: /testing-deployment-and-qa
    • Your team has little or no experience in mobile testing.
    • You need to optimize current testing processes to include mobile.
    • You need to conduct an RFP for mobile testing tools.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • One-size-fits-all testing won’t work for mobile. The testing tools are fragmented.
    • Mobile offers many new test cases, so organizations can expect to spend more time testing.

    Impact and Result

    • Identify and address gaps between your current testing process and a target state that includes mobile testing.
    • Establish project value metrics to ensure business and technical requirements are met.

    Optimize the Current Testing Process for Enterprise Mobile Applications Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Assess the current testing state

    Determine a starting point for architecture and discuss pain points that will drive reusability.

    • Storyboard: Optimize the Current Testing Process for Enterprise Mobile Applications
    • Mobile Testing Project Charter Template
    • Visual SOP Template for Application Testing

    2. Determine the target state testing framework

    Document a preliminary list of test requirements and create vendor RFP and scoring.

    • Test Requirements Tool
    • Request for Proposal (RFP) Template

    3. Implement testing tools to support the testing SOP

    Create an implementation rollout plan.

    • Project Planning and Monitoring Tool

    Infographic

    Workshop: Optimize the Current Testing Process for Enterprise Mobile Applications

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Assess the Fit for Test Process Optimization

    The Purpose

    Understand mobile testing pain points.

    Evaluate current statistics and challenges around mobile testing and compare with your organization.

    Realize the benefits of mobile testing.

    Understand the differences of mobile testing.

    Assess your readiness for optimizing testing to include mobile.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Preliminary understanding of how mobile testing is different from conventional approaches to testing apps.

    Understanding of how mobile testing can optimize your current testing process.

    Activities

    1.1 Understand the pain points experienced with mobile testing

    1.2 Evaluate current statistics and challenges of mobile testing and compare your organization

    1.3 Realize the benefits that come from mobile testing

    1.4 Understand the differences between mobile app testing and conventional app testing

    1.5 Assess your readiness for optimizing the testing process to include mobile

    Outputs

    Organizational state assessment for mobile testing

    2 Structure & Launch the Project

    The Purpose

    Identify stakeholders for testing requirements gathering.

    Create a project charter to obtain project approval.

    Present and obtain project charter sign-off.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Well documented project charter.

    Approval to launch the project.

    Activities

    2.1 Identify stakeholders for testing requirements gathering

    2.2 Create a project charter to obtain project approval

    2.3 Present & obtain project charter sign-off

    Outputs

    Project objectives and scope

    Project roles and responsibilities

    3 Assess Current Testing State

    The Purpose

    Document your current non-mobile testing processes.

    Create a current testing visual SOP.

    Determine current testing pain points.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Thorough understanding of current testing processes and pain points.

    Activities

    3.1 Document your current non-mobile testing processes

    3.2 Create a current state visual SOP

    3.3 Determine current testing pain points

    Outputs

    Documented current testing processes in the form of a visual SOP

    List of current testing pain points

    4 Determine Target State Testing Framework

    The Purpose

    Determine your target state for mobile testing.

    Choose vendors for the RFP process.

    Evaluate selected vendor(s) against testing requirements.

    Design mobile testing visual SOP(s).

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Prioritized list of testing requirements for mobile.

    Vendor selection for mobile testing solutions through an RFP process.

    New SOP designed to include both current testing and mobile testing processes.

    Activities

    4.1 Determine your target state for mobile testing by following Info-Tech’s framework as a starting point

    4.2 Design new SOP to include testing for mobile apps

    4.3 Translate all considered visual SOP mobile injections into requirements

    4.4 Document the preliminary list of test requirements in the RFP

    4.5 Determine which vendors to include for the RFP process

    4.6 Reach out to vendors for a request for proposal

    4.7 Objectively evaluate vendors against testing requirements

    4.8 Identify and assess the expected costs and impacts from determining your target state

    Outputs

    List of testing requirements for mobile

    Request for Proposal

    5 Implement Testing Tools to Support Your Testing SOP

    The Purpose

    Develop an implementation roadmap to integrate new testing initiatives.

    Anticipate potential roadblocks during implementation rollout.

    Operationalize mobile testing and ensure a smooth hand-off to IT operations.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Creation of implementation project plan.

    List of approaches to mitigate potential implementation roadblocks.

    Achieving clean hand-off to IT ops team.

    Activities

    5.1 Develop a project plan to codify your current understanding of the scope of work

    5.2 Anticipate potential roadblocks during your tool’s implementation

    5.3 Operationalize your testing tools and ensure a smooth hand-off from the project team

    Outputs

    Mobile testing metrics implementation plan

    6 Conduct Your Retrospectives

    The Purpose

    Conduct regular retrospectives to consider areas for improvement.

    Adjust your processes, systems, and testing tools to improve performance and usability.

    Revisit implementation metrics to communicate project benefits.

    Leverage the lessons learned and apply them to other projects.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Project specific metrics.

    Discovery of areas to improve.

    Activities

    6.1 Conduct regular retrospectives to consider areas for improvement

    6.2 Revisit your implementation metrics to communicate project benefits to business stakeholders

    6.3 Adjust your processes, systems, and testing tools to improve performance and usability

    6.4 Leverage the lessons learned and apply them to other IT projects

    Outputs

    Steps to improve your mobile testing

    Enterprise Architecture

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}43|cart{/j2store}
    • Related Products: {j2store}43|crosssells{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.2/10
    • member rating average dollars saved: $28,368
    • member rating average days saved: 24
    • Parent Category Name: Service Planning and Architecture
    • Parent Category Link: service-planning-and-architecture
    Demystify enterprise architecture value with key metrics.

    Design and Build a User-Facing Service Catalog

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}395|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.3/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $62,821 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 29 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Service Management
    • Parent Category Link: /service-management
    • Business users don’t know what breadth of services are available to them.
    • It is difficult for business users to obtain useful information regarding services because they are often described in technical language.
    • Business users have unrealistic expectations of what IT can do for them.
    • There is no defined agreement on what is available, so the business assumes everything is.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Define services from the business user’s perspective, not IT’s perspective.
      • A service catalog is of no use if a user looks at it and sees a significant amount of information that doesn’t apply to them.
    • Separate the enterprise services from the Line of Business (LOB) services.
      • This will simplify the process of documenting your service definitions and make it easier for users to navigate, which leads to a higher chance of user acceptance.

    Impact and Result

    • Our program helps you organize your services in a way that is relevant to the users, and practical and manageable for IT.
    • Our approach to defining and categorizing services ensures your service catalog remains a living document. You may add or revise your service records with ease.
    • Our program creates a bridge between IT and the business. Begin transforming IT’s perception within the organization by communicating the benefits of the service catalog.

    Design and Build a User-Facing Service Catalog Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise executive brief to understand why building a Service Catalog is a good idea for your business, and how following our approach will help you accomplish this difficult task.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Launch the project

    The Launch the Project phase will walk through completing Info-Tech's project charter template. This phase will help build a balanced project team, create a change message and communication plan, and achieve buy-in from key stakeholders.

    • Design & Build a User-Facing Service Catalog – Phase 1: Launch the Project
    • Service Catalog Project Charter

    2. Identify and define enterprise services

    The Identify and Define Enterprise Services phase will help to target enterprise services offered by the IT team. They are offered to everyone in the organization, and are grouped together in logical categories for users to access them easily.

    • Design & Build a User-Facing Service Catalog – Phase 2: Identify and Define Enterprise Services
    • Sample Enterprise Services

    3. Identify and define Line of Business (LOB) services

    After completing this phase, all services IT offers to each LOB or functional group should have been identified. Each group should receive different services and display only these services in the catalog.

    • Design & Build a User-Facing Service Catalog – Phase 3: Identify and Define Line of Business Services
    • Sample LOB Services – Industry Specific
    • Sample LOB Services – Functional Group

    4. Complete the Services Definition Chart

    Completing the Services Definition Chart will help the business pick which information to include in the catalog. This phase also prepares the catalog to be extended into a technical service catalog through the inclusion of IT-facing fields.

    • Design & Build a User-Facing Service Catalog – Phase 4: Complete Service Definitions
    • Services Definition Chart
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Design and Build a User-Facing Service Catalog

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Launch the Project

    The Purpose

    The purpose of this module is to help engage IT with business decision making.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    This module will help build a foundation for the project to begin. The buy-in from key stakeholders is key to having them take onus on the project’s completion.

    Activities

    1.1 Assemble the project team.

    1.2 Develop a communication plan.

    1.3 Establish metrics for success.

    1.4 Complete the project charter.

    Outputs

    A list of project members, stakeholders, and a project leader.

    A change message, communication strategy, and defined benefits for each user group.

    Metrics used to monitor the usefulness of the catalog, both from a performance and monetary perspective.

    A completed project charter to engage users in the initiative.

    2 Identify and Define Enterprise Services

    The Purpose

    The purpose of this module is to review services which are offered across the entire organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A complete list of enterprise services defined from the user’s perspective to help them understand what is available to them.

    Activities

    2.1 Identify enterprise services used by almost everyone across the organization.

    2.2 Categorize services into logical groups.

    2.3 Define the services from the user’s perspective.

    Outputs

    A complete understanding of enterprise services for both IT service providers and business users.

    Logical groups for organizing the services in the catalog.

    Completed definitions in business language, preferably reviewed by business users.

    3 Identify and Define Line of Business (LOB) Services

    The Purpose

    The purpose of this module is to define the remaining LOB services for business users, and separate them into functional groups.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Business users are not cluttered with LOB definitions that do not pertain to their business activities.

    Business users are provided with only relevant IT information.

    Activities

    3.1 Identify the LOBs.

    3.2 Determine which one of two methodologies is more suitable.

    3.3 Identify LOB services using appropriate methodology.

    3.4 Define services from a user perspective.

    Outputs

    A structured view of the different functional groups within the business.

    An easy to follow process for identifying all services for each LOB.

    A list of every service for each LOB.

    Completed definitions in business language, preferably reviewed by business users.

    4 Complete the Full Service Definitions

    The Purpose

    The purpose of this module is to guide the client to completing their service record definitions completely.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    This module will finalize the deliverable for the client by defining every user-facing service in novice terms.

    Activities

    4.1 Understand the components to each service definition (information fields).

    4.2 Pick which information to include in each definition.

    4.3 Complete the service definitions.

    Outputs

    A selection of information fields to be included in the service catalog.

    A selection of information fields to be included in the service catalog.

    A completed service record design, ready to be implemented with the right tool.

    Further reading

    Design and Build a User-Facing Service Catalog

    Improve user satisfaction with IT with a convenient menu-like catalog.

    Our understanding of the problem

    This Research Is Designed For:

    • CIOs
    • Directors and senior managers within IT and the business

    This Research Will Help You:

    • Articulate all of the services IT provides to the business in a language the business users understand.
    • Improve IT and business alignment through a common understanding of service features and IT support.

    This Research Will Help Them

    • Standardize and communicate how users request access to services.
    • Standardize and communicate how users obtain support for services.
    • Clearly understand IT’s role in providing each service.

    What is a service catalog?

    The user-facing service catalog is the go-to place for IT service-related information.

    The catalog defines, documents, and organizes the services that IT delivers to the organization. The catalog also describes the features of the services and how the services are intended to be used.

    The user-facing service catalog creates benefits for both the business and IT.

    For business users, the service catalog:

    1. Documents how to request access to the service, hours of availability, delivery timeframes, and customer responsibilities.
    2. Specifies how to obtain support for the services, support hours, and documentation.

    For IT, the service catalog:

    1. Identifies who owns the services and who is authorized to use the services.
    2. Specifies IT support requirements for the services, including support hours and documentation.

    What is the difference between a user-facing service catalog and a technical service catalog?

    This blueprint is about creating a user-facing service catalog written and organized in a way that focuses on the services from the business’ view.

    User facing

    User-friendly, intuitive, and simple overview of the services that IT provides to the business.

    The items you would see on the menu at a restaurant are an example of User Facing. The content is relatable and easy to understand.

    Technical

    Series of technical workflows, supporting services, and the technical components that are required to deliver a service.

    The recipe book with cooking instructions is an example of Technical Facing. This catalog is intended for the IT teams and is “behind the scene.”

    What is a service and what does it mean to be service oriented?

    The sum of the people, processes, and technologies required to enable users to achieve a business outcome is a Service.

    A service is used directly by the end users and is perceived as a coherent whole.

    Business Users →Service = Application & Systems + People & Processes

    Service Orientation is…

    • A focus on business requirements and business value, rather than IT driven motives.
    • Services are designed to enable required business activities.
    • Services are defined from the business perspective using business language.

    In other words, put on your user hat and leave behind the technical jargons!

    A lack of a published user-facing service catalog could be the source of many pains throughout your organization

    IT Pains

    • IT doesn’t understand all the services they provide.
    • Business users would go outside of IT for solutions, proliferating shadow IT.
    • Business users have a negative yet unrealistic perception of what IT is capable of.
    • IT has no way of managing expectations for their users, which tend to inflate.
    • There is often no defined agreement on services; the business assumes everything is available.

    Business Pains

    • Business users don’t know what services are available to them.
    • It is difficult to obtain useful information regarding a service because IT always talks in technical language.
    • Without a standard process in place, business users don’t know how to request access to a service with multiple sources of information available.
    • Receiving IT support is a painful, long process and IT doesn’t understand what type of support the business requires.

    An overwhelming majority of IT organizations still need to improve how they demonstrate their value to the business

    This image contains a pie chart with a slice representing 23% of the circle This image contains a pie chart with a slice representing 47% of the circle This image contains a pie chart with a slice representing 92% of the circle

    23% of IT is still viewed as a cost center.

    47% of business executives believe that business goals are going unsupported by IT.

    92% of IT leaders see the need to prove the business value of IT’s contribution.

    How a Service Catalog can help:

    Use the catalog to demonstrate how IT is an integral part of the organization and IT services are essential to achieve business objectives.

    Source: IT Communication in Crisis Report

    Transform the perception of IT by articulating all the services that are provided through the service catalog in a user-friendly language.

    Source: Info-Tech Benchmarking and Diagnostic Programs

    Increase IT-business communication and collaboration through the service catalog initiative. Move from technology focused to service-oriented.

    Source: IT Communication in Crisis Report

    Project Steps

    Phase 1 – Project Launch

    1.2 Project Team

    The team must be balanced between representatives from the business and IT.

    1.2 Communication Plan

    Communication plan to facilitate input from both sides and gain adoption.

    1.3 Identify Metrics

    Metrics should reflect the catalog benefits. Look to reduced number of service desk inquiries.

    1.4 Project Charter

    Project charter helps walk you through project preparation.

    This blueprint separates enterprise service from line of business service.

    This image contains a comparison between Enterprise IT Service and Line of Business Service, which will be discussed in further detail later in this blueprint.

    Project steps

    Phase 2 – Identify and Define Enterprise Services

    2.1 Identify the services that are used across the entire organization.

    2.2 Users must be able to identify with the service categories.

    2.3 Create basic definitions for enterprise services.

    Phase 3 – Identify and Define Line of Business Services

    3.1 Identify the different lines of business (LOBs) in the organization.

    3.2 Understand the differences between our two methodologies for identifying LOB services.

    3.3 Use methodology 1 if you have thorough knowledge of the business.

    3.4 Use methodology 2 if you only have an IT view of the LOB.

    Phase 4 – Complete Service Definitions

    4.1 Understand the different components to each service definition, or the fields in the service record.

    4.2 Identify which information to include for each service definition.

    4.3 Define each enterprise service according to the information and field properties.

    4.3 Define each LOB service according to the information and field properties.

    Define your service catalog in bundles to achieve better catalog design in the long run

    Trying to implement too many services at once can be overwhelming for both IT and the users. You don’t have to define and implement all of your services in one release of the catalog.

    Info-Tech recommends implementing services themselves in batches, starting with enterprise, and then grouping LOB services into separate releases. Why? It benefits both IT and business users:

    • It enables a better learning experience for IT – get to test the first release before going full-scale. In other words, IT gets a better understanding of all components of their deliverable before full adoption.
    • It is easier to meet customer agreements on what is to be delivered early, and easier to be able to meet those deadlines.
    This image depicts how you can use bundles to simplify the process of catalog design using bundles. The cycle includes the steps: Identify Services; Select a Service Bundle; Review Record Design; followed by a cycle of: Pick a service; Service X; Service Data Collection; Create Service Record, followed by Publish the bundle; Communicate the bundle; Rinse and Repeat.

    After implementing a service catalog, your IT will be able to:

    Use the service catalog to communicate all the services that IT provides to the business.

    Improve IT’s visibility within the organization by creating a single source of information for all the value creating services IT has to offer. The service catalog helps the business understand the value IT brings to each service, each line of business, and the overall organization.

    Concentrate more on high-value IT services.

    The service catalog contains information which empowers business users to access IT services and information without the help of IT support staff. The reduction in routine inquiries decreases workload and increases morale within the IT support team, and allows IT to concentrate on providing higher value services.

    Reduce shadow IT and gain control of services.

    Service catalog brings more control to your IT environment by reducing shadow IT activities. The service catalog communicates business requests responsively in a language the business users understand, thus eliminating the need for users to seek outside help.

    After implementing a service catalog, your business will be able to:

    Access IT services with ease.

    The language of IT is often confusing for the business and the users don’t know what to do when they have a concern. With a user-facing service catalog, business users can access information through a single source of information, and better understand how to request access or receive support for a service through clear, consistent, and business-relevant language.

    Empower users to self-serve.

    The service catalog enables users to “self-serve” IT services. Instead of calling the service desk every time an issue occurs, the users can rely on the service catalog for information. This simplified process not only reduces routine service requests, but also provides information in a faster, more efficient manner that increases productivity for both IT and the business.

    Gain transparency on the IT services provided.

    With every service clearly defined, business users can better understand the current support level, communicate their expectation for IT accountability, and help IT align services with critical business strategies.

    Leverage the different Info-Tech deliverable tools to help you along the way

    1. Project Charter

    A project charter template with a few samples completed. The project charter helps you govern the project progress and responsibilities.

    2. Enterprise Service Definitions

    A full list of enterprise definitions with features and descriptions pre-populated. These are meant to get you on your feet defining your own enterprise services, or editing the ones already there.

    3. Basic Line of Business Service Definitions

    Similar to the enterprise services deliverable, but with two separate deliverables focusing on different perspectives – functional groups services (e.g. HR and finance) and industry-specific services (e.g. education and government).

    Service Definitions & Service Record Design

    Get a taste of a completed service catalog with full service definitions and service record design. This is the final product of the service catalog design once all the steps and activities have been completed.

    The service catalog can be the foundation of your future IT service management endeavors

    After establishing a catalog of all IT services, the following projects are often pursued for other objectives. Service catalog is a precursor for all three.

    1. Technical Service Catalog

    Need an IT-friendly breakdown of each service?
    Keep better record of what technical components are required to deliver a service. The technical service catalog is the IT version of a user-facing catalog.

    2. Service-Based Costing

    Want to know how much each IT service is costing you?
    Get a better grip on the true cost of IT. Using service-based costing can help justify IT expenses and increase budgetary allotment.

    3. Chargeback

    Want to hold each business unit accountable for the IT services they use?
    Some business units abuse their IT services because they are thought to be free. Keep them accountable and charge them for what they use.

    The service catalog need not be expensive – organizations of all sizes (small, medium, large) can benefit from a service catalog

    No matter what size organization you may be, every organization can create a service catalog. Small businesses can benefit from the catalog the same way a large organization can. We have an easy step-by-step methodology to help introduce a catalog to your business.

    It is common that users do not know where to go to obtain services from IT… We always end up with a serious time-crunch at the beginning of a new school year. With automated on- and off-boarding services, this could change for the better.Dean Obermeyer, Technology Coordinator, Los Alamos Public Schools

    CIO Call to Action

    As the CIO and the project sponsor, you need to spearhead the development of the service catalog and communicate support to drive engagement and adoption.

      Start

    1. Select an experienced project leader
    2. Identify stakeholders and select project team members with the project leader
    3. Throughout the project

    4. Attend or lead the project kick-off meeting
    5. Create checkpoints to regularly touch base with the project team
    6. Service catalog launch

    7. Communicate the change message from beginning to implementation

    Identify a project leader who will drive measurable results with this initiative

    The project leader acts on behalf of the CIO and must be a senior level staff member who has extensive knowledge of the organization and experiences marshalling resources.

    Influential & Impactful

    Developing a service catalog requires dedication from many groups within IT and outside of IT.
    The project leader must hold a visible, senior position and can marshal all the necessary resources to ensure the success of the project. Ability to exert impact and influence around both IT and the business is a must.

    Relationship with the Business

    The user-facing service catalog cannot be successful if business input is not received.
    The project leader must leverage his/her existing relationship with the business to test out the service definitions and the service record design.

    Results Driven

    Creating a service catalog is not an easy job and the project leader must continuously engage the team members to drive results and efficiency.
    The highly visible nature of the service catalog means the project leader must produce a high-quality outcome that satisfies the business users.

    Info-Tech’s methodology helps organization to standardize how to define services

    CASE STUDY A
    Industry Municipal Government
    Source Onsite engagement

    Municipal Government
    The IT department of a large municipal government in the United States provides services to a large number of customers in various government agencies.
    Service Catalog Initiative
    The municipal government allocated a significant amount of resources to answer routine inquiries that could have been avoided through user self-service. The government also found that they do not organize all the services IT provides, and they could not document and publish them to the customer. The government has already begun the service catalog initiative, but was struggling with how to identify services. Progress was slow because people were arguing amongst themselves – the project team became demoralized and the initiative was on the brink of failure.
    Results
    With Info-Tech’s onsite support, the government was able to follow a standardized methodology to identify and define services from the user perspective. The government was able to successfully communicate the initiative to the business before the full adoption of the service catalog.

    We’re in demos with vendors right now to purchase an ITSM tool, and when the first vendor looked at our finished catalog, they were completely impressed.- Client Feedback

    [We feel] very confident. The group as a whole is pumped up and empowered – they're ready to pounce on it. We plan to stick to the schedule for the next three months, and then review progress/priorities. - Client Feedback

    CASE STUDY B
    Industry Healthcare
    Source Onsite engagement

    Healthcare Provider
    The organization is a healthcare provider in Canada. It treats patients with medical emergencies, standard operations, and manages a faculty of staff ranging from nurses and clerks, to senior doctors. This organization is run across several hospitals, various local clinics, and research centers.
    Service Catalog Initiative
    Because the organization is publicly funded, it is subject to regular audit requirements – one of which is to have a service catalog in place.
    The organization also would like to charge back its clients for IT-related costs. In order to do this, the organization must be able to trace it back to each service. Therefore, the first step would be to create a user-facing service catalog, followed by the technical service catalog, which then allows the organization to do service-based costing and chargeback.
    Results
    By leveraging Info-Tech’s expertise on the subject, the healthcare provider was able to fast-track its service catalog development and establish the groundwork for chargeback abilities.

    "There is always some reticence going in, but none of that was apparent coming out. The group dynamic was very good. [Info-Tech] was able to get that response, and no one around the table was silent.
    The [expectation] of the participants was that there was a purpose in doing the workshop. Everybody knew it was for multiple reasons, and everyone had their own accountability/stakes in the development of it. Highly engaged."
    - Client Feedback

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    “Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

    Workshop

    “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

    Consulting

    “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Launch the Project

    Identify Enterprise Services

    Identify Line of Business Services

    Complete Service Definitions

    Best-Practice Toolkit

    1.1 Assemble the project team.

    1.2 Develop a communication plan.

    1.3 Establish metrics for success.

    1.4 Complete the project charter.

    2.1 Identify services available organization-wide.

    2.2 Categorize services into logical groups.

    2.3 Define the services.

    3.1 Identify different LOBs.

    3.2 Pick one of two methodologies.

    3.3 Use method to identify LOB services.

    4.1 Learn components to each service definition.

    4.2 Pick which information to include in each definition.

    4.3 Define each service accordingly.

    Guided Implementations Identify the project leader with the appropriate skills.

    Assemble a well-rounded project team.

    Develop a mission statement and change messages.

    Create a comprehensive list of enterprise services that are used across the organization.

    Create a categorization scheme that is based on the needs of the business users.

    Walk through the two Info-Tech methodologies and understand which one is applicable.

    Define LOB services using the appropriate methodology.

    Decide what should be included and what should be kept internal for the service record design.

    Complete the full service definitions.

    Onsite Workshop Phase 1 Results:

    Clear understanding of project objectives and support obtained from the business.

    Phase 2 Results:

    Enterprise services defined and categorized.

    Phase 3 Results:

    LOB services defined based on user perspective.

    Phase 4 Results:

    Service record designed according to how IT wishes to communicate to the business.

    Workshop overview

    Contact your account representative or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Workshop Day 1 Workshop Day 2 Workshop Day 3 Workshop Day 4
    Activities

    Launch the Project

    Identify Enterprise Services

    Identify Line of Business Services

    Complete Service Definitions

    1.1 Assemble the project team.

    1.2 Develop a communication plan.

    1.3 Establish metrics for success.

    1.4 Complete the project charter.

    2.1 Identify services available organization-wide.

    2.2 Categorize services into logical groups.

    2.3 Define the services.

    3.1 Identify different LOBs.

    3.2 Pick one of two methodologies.

    3.3 Use method to identify LOB services.

    4.1 Learn components to each service definition.

    4.2 Pick which information to include in each definition.

    4.3 Define each service accordingly.

    Deliverables
    • Service Catalog Project Charter
    • Enterprise Service Definitions
    • LOB Service Definitions – Functional groups
    • LOB Service Definitions – Industry specific
    • Service Definitions Chart

    PHASE 1

    Launch the Project

    Design & Build a User-Facing Service Catalog

    Step 1 – Create a project charter to launch the initiative

    1. Complete the Project Charter
    2. Create Enterprise Services Definitions
    3. Create Line of Business Services Definitions
    4. Complete Service Definitions

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Develop a mission statement to obtain buy-ins from both IT and business stakeholders.
    • Assemble a well-rounded project team to increase the success of the project.
    • Identify and obtain support from stakeholders.
    • Create an impactful change message to the organization to promote the service catalog.
    • Determine project metrics to measure the effectiveness and value of the initiative.

    Step Insights

    • The project leader must have a strong relationship with the business, the ability to garner user input, and the authority to lead the team in creating a user-facing catalog that is accessible and understandable to the user.
    • Having two separate change messages prepared for IT and the business is a must. The business change message advocates how the catalog will make IT more accessible to users, and the IT message centers around how the catalog will make IT’s life easier through a standardized request process.

    Phase 1 outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 1: Launch the project
    Proposed Time to Completion: 2 weeks
    Step 1.2: Create change messages

    Step 1.2: Create change messages

    Start with an analyst kick off call:

    • Identify the key objectives of creating a user-facing service catalog.
    • Identify the necessary members of the project team.

    Review findings with analyst:

    • Prioritize project stakeholders according to their involvement and influence.
    • Create a change message for IT and the business articulating the benefits.

    Then complete these activities…

  • Assemble a team with representatives from all areas of IT.
  • Identify the key project stakeholders.
  • Create a project mission statement.
  • Then complete these activities…

  • Create a separate change message for IT and the business.
  • Determine communication methods and channels.
  • With these tools & templates: Service

    Catalog Project Charter

    With these tools & templates:

    Service Catalog Project Charter

    Use Info-Tech’s Service Catalog Project Charter to begin your initiative

    1.1 Project Charter

    The following section of slides outline how to effectively use Info-Tech’s sample project charter.

    The Project Charter is used to govern the initiative throughout the project. IT should provide the foundation for project communication and monitoring.

    It has been pre-populated with information appropriate for Service Catalog projects. Please review this sample text and change, add, or delete information as required.

    Building the charter as a group will help you to clarify your key messages and help secure buy-in from critical stakeholders upfront.

    You may feel like a full charter isn’t necessary, and depending on your organizational size, it might not be. However, the exercise of building the charter is important none-the-less. No matter your current climate, some elements of communicating the value and plans for implementing the catalog will be necessary.

    The Charter includes the following sections:

    • Mission Statement
    • Project team members
    • Project stakeholders
    • Change message
    • Communication and organizational plan
    • Metrics

    Use Info-Tech’s Service Catalog Project Charter.

    Create a mission statement to articulate the purpose of this project

    The mission statement must be compelling because embarking on creating a service catalog is no easy task. It requires significant commitment from different people in different areas of the business.

    Good mission statements are directive, easy to understand, narrow in focus, and favor substance over vagueness.

    While building your mission statement, think about what it is intended to do, i.e. keep the project team engaged and engage others to adopt the service catalog. Included in the project charter’s mission statement section is a brief description of the goals and objectives of the service catalog.

    Ask yourself the following questions:

    1. What frustrations does your business face regarding IT services?
    2. f our company continues growing at this rate, will IT be able to manage service levels?
    3. How has IT benefited from consolidating IT services into a user perspective?

    Project Charter

    Info-Tech’s project charter contains two sample mission statements, along with additional tips to help you create yours.

    Tackle the project with a properly assembled team to increase the speed and quality in which the catalog will be created

    Construct a well-balanced project team to increase your chances of success.

    Project Leader

    Project leader will be the main catalyst for the creation of the catalog. This person is responsible for driving the whole initiative.

    Project Participants

    IT project participants’ input and business input will be pivotal to the creation of the catalog.

    Project Stakeholders

    The project stakeholders are the senior executives who have a vested interest in the service catalog. IT must produce periodic and targeted communication to these stakeholders.

    Increase your chances of success by creating a dynamic group of project participants

    Your project team will be a major success factor for your service catalog. Involvement from IT management and the business is a must.

    IT Team Member

    IT Service Desk Manager

    • The Service Desk team will be an integral part of the service catalog creation. Because of their client-facing work, service desk technicians can provide real feedback about how users view and request services.

    Senior Manager/Director of Application

    • The Application representative provides input on how applications are used by the business and supported by IT.

    Senior Manager/Director of Infrastructure

    • The infrastructure representative provides input on services regarding data storage, device management, security, etc.

    Business Team Member

    Business IT Liaison

    • This role is responsible for bridging the communication between IT and the business. This role could be fulfilled by the business relationship manager, service delivery manager, or business analyst. It doesn’t have to be a dedicated role; it could be part of an existing role.

    Business representatives from different LOBs

    • Business users need to validate the service catalog design and ensure the service definitions are user facing and relevant.

    Project Charter

    Input your project team, their roles, and relevant contact information into your project charter, Section 2.

    Identify the senior managers who are the stakeholders for the service catalog

    Obtain explicit buy-in from both IT and business stakeholders.

    The stakeholders could be your biggest champions for the service catalog initiative, or they could pull you back significantly. Engage the stakeholders at the start of the project and communicate the benefits of the service catalog to them to gain their approval.

    Stakeholders

    Benefits

    CIO
    • Improved visibility and perception for IT
    • Ability to better manage business expectation

    Manager of Service Desk

    • Reduced number of routine inquires
    • Respond to business needs faster and uniformly

    Senior Manager/Director of Application & Infrastructure

    • Streamlined and standardized request/support process
    • More effective communication with the business

    Senior Business Executives from Major LOBs

    • Self-service increases user productivity for business users
    • Better quality of services provided by IT

    Project Charter

    Document a list of stakeholders, their involvement in the process (why they are stakeholders), and their contact information in Section 3.

    Articulate the creation of the service catalog to the organization

    Spread the word of service catalog implementation. Bring attention to your change message through effective mediums and organizational changes.

    Key aspects of a communication plan

    The methods of communication (e.g. newsletters, email broadcast, news of the day, automated messages) notify users of implementation.

    In addition, it is important to know who will deliver the message (delivery strategy). Talking to the business leaders is very important, and you need IT executives to deliver the message. Work hard on obtaining their support as they are the ones communicating to their staff and could be your project champions.

    Recommended organizational changes

    The communication plan should consist of changes that will affect the way users interact with the catalog. Users should know of any meetings pertinent to the maintenance and improvement of the catalog, and ways to access the catalog (e.g. link on desktop/start menu).

    This image depicts the cycle of communicating change. the items in the cycle include: What is the change?; Why are we doing it?; How are we going to go about it?; What are we trying to achieve?; How often will we be updated?

    The Qualities of Leadership: Leading Change

    Project Charter

    Your communication plan should serve as a rough guide. Communication happens in several unpredictable happenstances, but the overall message should be contained within.

    Ensure you get the whole company on board for the service catalog with a well practiced change message

    The success of your catalog implementation hinges on the business’ readiness.

    One of the top challenges for organizations that are implementing a service catalog is the acceptance and adoption of the change. Effective planning for implementation and communication is pivotal. Ensure you create tailored plans for communication and understand how the change will impact staff.

    1. Draft your change message
    2. “Better Service, Better Value.” It is important to have two change messages prepared: one for the IT department and one for business users.
      Outline a few of the key benefits each user group will gain from adopting the service catalog (e.g. Faster, ease of use, convenient, consistent…)

    3. Address feedback
    4. Anticipate some resistances of service catalog adoption and prepare responses. These may be the other benefits which were not included in the change message (e.g. IT may be reluctant to think in business language.)

    5. Conduct training sessions
    6. Host lunch & learns to demonstrate the value of the service catalog to both business and IT user groups.
      These training sessions also serve as a great way to gather feedback from users regarding style and usability.

    Project Charter

    Pick your communication medium, and then identify your target audience. You should have a change message for each: the IT department and the business users. Pay careful consideration to wording and phrasing with regard for each.

    Track metrics throughout the project to keep stakeholders informed

    In order to measure the success of your service catalog, you must establish baseline metrics to determine how much value the catalog is creating for your business.

    1. Number of service requests via the service catalog
    2. The number of service catalog requests should be carefully monitored so that it does not fluctuate too greatly. In general, the number of requests via the service catalog should increase, which indicates a higher level of self-serve.

    3. Number of inquiry calls to the service desk
    4. The number of inquiry calls should decrease because customers are able to self-serve routine IT inquiries that would otherwise have gone through the service desk.

    5. Customer satisfaction – specific questions
    6. The organization could adopt the following sample survey questions:
      From 0-5: How satisfied are you with the functionality of the service catalog? How often do you turn to the service catalog first to solve IT problems?

    7. Number of non-standard requests
    8. The number of non-standard requests should decrease because a majority of services should eventually be covered in the service catalog. Users should be able to solve nearly any IT related problem through navigating the service catalog.

    Metric Description Current Metric Future Goal
    Number of service requests via the Service Catalog
    Number of inquiry calls to the service desk
    Customer Satisfaction – specific question
    Number of non-standard requests

    Use metrics to monitor the monetary improvements the service catalog creates for the business

    When measuring against your baseline, you should expect to see the following two monetary improvements:

    1. Improved service desk efficiency
    2. (# of routine inquiry calls reduced) x (average time for a call) x (average service desk wage)

      Routine inquiries often take up a significant portion of the service desk’s effort, and the majority of them can be answered via the service catalog, thus reducing the amount of time required for a service desk employee to engage in routine solutions. The reduction in routine inquiries allows IT to allocate resources to high-value services and provide higher quality of support.

    Example

    Originally, the service desk of an organization answers 850 inquiries per month, and around 540 of them are routine inquiries requesting information on when a service is available, who they can contact if they want to receive a service, and what they need to do if they want access to a service, etc.

    IT successfully communicated the introduction of the service catalog to the business and 3 months after the service catalog was implemented, the number of routine inquiries dropped to 60 per month. Given that the average time for IT to answer the inquiry is 10 minutes (0.167 hour) and the hourly wage of a service desk technician is $25, the monthly monetary cost saving of the service catalog is:

    (540 – 60) x 0.167 x 25 = $2004.00

    • Reduced expense by eliminating non-standard requests

    (Average additional cost of non-standard request) x (Reduction of non-standard request)
    +
    (Extra time IT spends on non-standard request fulfilment) x (Average wage)

    Non-standard requests require a lot of time, and often a lot of money. IT frequently incurs additional cost because the business is not aware of how to properly request service or support. Not only can the service catalog standardize and streamline the service request process, it can also help IT define its job boundary and say no to the business if needed.

    Example

    The IT department of an organization often finds itself dealing with last-minute, frustrating service requests from the business. For example, although equipment requests should be placed a week in advance, the business often requests equipment to be delivered the next day, leaving IT to pay for additional expedited shipping costs and/or working fanatically to allocate the equipment. Typically, these requests happen 4 times a month, with an additional cost of $200.00. IT staff work an extra 6 hours per each non-standard request at an hourly wage of $30.00.

    With the service catalog, the users are now aware of the rules that are in place and can submit their request with more ease. IT can also refer the users to the service catalog when a non-standard request occurs, which helps IT to charge the cost to the department or not meet the terms of the business.

    The monthly cost saving in this case is:

    $200.00 x 4 + 6 hours x 30 = $980.00

    Create your project charter for the service catalog initiative to get key stakeholders to buy in

    1.1 2-3 hours

    The project charter is an important document to govern your project process. Support from the project sponsors is important and must be documented. Complete the following steps working with Info-Tech’s sample Project Charter.

    1. The project leader and the core project team must identify key reasons for creating a service catalog. Document the project objectives and benefits in the mission statement section.
    2. Identify and document your project team. The team must include representatives from the Infrastructure, Applications, Service desk, and a Business-IT Liaison.
    3. Identify and document your project stakeholders. The stakeholders are those who have interest in seeing the service catalog completed. Stakeholders for IT are the CIO and management of different IT practices. Stakeholders for the business are executives of different LOBs.
    4. Identify your target audience and choose the communication medium most effective to reach them. Draft a communication message hitting all key elements.
      Info-Tech’s project charter contains sample change messages for the business and IT.
    5. Develop a strategy as to how the change message will be distributed, i.e. the communication and organizational change plan.
    6. Use the metrics identified as a base to measure your service catalog’s implementation. If you have identified any other objectives, add new metrics to monitor your progress from the baseline to reaching those objectives.
    7. Sign and date the project charter to officiate commitment to completing the project and reaching your objectives. Have the signed and dated charter available to members of the project team.

    INPUT

    • A collaborative discussion between team members

    OUTPUT

    • Thorough briefing for project launch
    • A committed team

    Materials

    • Communication message and plan
    • Metric tracking

    Participants

    • Project leader
    • Core project team

    Obtain buy-in from business users at the beginning of the service catalog initiative

    CASE STUDY A
    Industry Government
    Source Onsite engagement

    Challenge

    The nature of government IT is quite complex: there are several different agencies located in a number of different areas. It is extremely important to communicate the idea of the service catalog to all the users, no matter the agency or location.

    The IT department had yet to let business leaders of the various agencies know about the initiative and garner their support for the project. This has proven to be prohibitive for gaining adoption from all users.

    Solution

    The IT leaders met and identified all the opportunities to communicate the service catalog to the business leaders and end users.

    To meet with the business leaders, IT leaders hosted a service level meeting with the business directors and managers. They adopted a steering committee for the continuation of the project.

    To communicate with business users, IT leaders published announcements on the intranet website before releasing the catalog there as well.

    Results

    Because IT communicated the initiative, support from business stakeholders was obtained early and business leaders were on board shortly after.

    IT also managed to convince key business stakeholders to become project champions, and leveraged their network to communicate the initiative to their employees.

    With this level of adoption, it meant that it was easier for IT to garner business participation in the project and to obtain feedback throughout.

    Info-Tech assists project leader to garner support from the project team

    CASE STUDY A
    Industry Government
    Source Onsite engagement

    Challenge

    The project received buy-in from the CIO and director of infrastructure. Together they assembled a team and project leader.

    The two struggled to get buy-in from the rest of the team, however. They didn’t understand the catalog or its benefits and objectives. They were reluctant to change their old ways. They didn’t know how much work was required from them to accomplish the project.

    Solution

    With the Info-Tech analyst on site, the client was able to discuss the benefits within their team as well as the project team responsibilities.

    The Info-Tech analyst convinced the group to move towards focusing on a business- and service-oriented mindset.

    The workshop discussion was intended to get the entire team on board and engaged with meeting project objectives.

    Results

    The project team had experienced full buy-in after the workshop. The CIO and director relived their struggles of getting project members on-board through proper communication and engagement.

    Engaging the members of the project team with the discussion was key to having them take ownership in accomplishing the project.

    The business users understood that the service catalog was to benefit their long-term IT service development.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.
    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:
    1.1 this image contains a screenshot from section 1.1 of this blueprint. Begin your project with a mission statement
    A strong mission statement that outlines the benefits of the project is needed to communicate the purpose of the project. The onsite Info-Tech analysts will help you customize the message and establish the foundation of the project charter.
    1.2 this image contains a screenshot from section 1.2 of this blueprint.

    Identify project team members

    Our onsite analysts will help you identify high-value team members to contribute to this project.

    1.3 This image contains a screenshot from section 1.3 of this blueprint.

    Identify important business and IT stakeholders

    Buy-in from senior IT and business management is a must. Info-Tech will help you identify the stakeholders and determine their level of influence and impact.

    1.4 This image contains a screenshot from section 1.4 of this blueprint.

    Create a change message for the business and IT

    It is important to communicate changes early and the message must be tailored for each target audience. Our analysts will help you create an effective message by articulating the benefits of the service catalog to the business and to IT.

    1.5 This image contains a screenshot from section 1.5 of this blueprint.

    Determine service project metrics

    To demonstrate the value of the service catalog, IT must come up with tangible metrics. Info-Tech’s analysts will provide some sample metrics as well as facilitate a discussion around which metrics should be tracked and monitored.

    PHASE 2

    Identify and Define Enterprise Services

    Design & Build a User-Facing Service Catalog

    Step 2 – Create Enterprise Services Definitions

    1. Complete the Project Charter
    2. Create Enterprise Services Definitions
    3. Create Line of Business Services Definitions
    4. Complete Service Definitions

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify and define enterprise services that are commonly used across the organization.
    • Create service descriptions and features to accurately sum up the functionality of each service.
    • Create service categories and assign each service to a category.

    Step Insights

    • When defining services, be sure to carefully distinguish between what is a feature and what is a service. Often, separate services are defined in situations when they would be better off as features of existing services, and vice versa.
    • When coming up with enterprise services categories, ensure the categories group the services in a way that is intuitive. The users should be able to find a service easily based on the names of the categories.

    Phase 2 outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 2: Define Enterprise Services
    Proposed Time to Completion: 4 weeks

    Step 2.1: Identify enterprise services

    Step 2.2: Create service categories

    Start with an analyst kick off call:

    • Identify enterprise services that are commonly used.
    • Ensure the list is comprehensive and capture common IT needs.
    • Create service descriptions and features.

    Review findings with analyst:

    • Review full list of identified enterprise services.
    • Identify service categories that are intuitive to the users.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Use Info-Tech’s sample enterprise service definitions as a guide, and change/add/delete the service definitions to customize them to your organization.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Group identified services into categories that are intuitive to the users.

    With these tools & templates: Service

    Sample Enterprise Services

    With these tools & templates:

    Sample Enterprise Services

    Identify enterprise services in the organization apart from the services available to lines of business

    Separating enterprise services from line of business services helps keep things simple to organize the service catalog. -

    Documentation of all business-facing IT services is an intimidating task, and a lack of parameters around this process often leads to longer project times and unsatisfactory outcomes.

    To streamline this process, separating enterprise services from line of business services allows IT to effectively and efficiently organize these services. This method increases the visibility of the service catalog through user-oriented communication plans.

    Enterprise Services are common services that are used across the organization.

    1. Common Services for all users within the organization (e.g. Email, Video Conferencing, Remote Access, Guest Wireless)
    2. Service Requests organized into Service Offerings (e.g. Hardware Provisioning, Software Deployment, Hardware Repair, Equipment Loans)
    3. Consulting Services (e.g. Project Management, Business Analysis, RFP Preparation, Contract Negotiation)

    All user groups access Enterprise Services

    Enterprise Services

    • Finance
    • IT
    • Sales
    • HR

    Ensure your enterprise services are defined from the user perspective and are commonly used

    If you are unsure whether a service is enterprise wide, ask yourself these two questions:

    This image contains an example of how you would use the two questions: Does the user directly use the service themselves?; and; Is the service used by the entire organization (or nearly everyone)?. The examples given are: A. Video Conferencing; B. Exchange Server; C. Email & Fax; D. Order Entry System

    Leverage Info-Tech’s Sample Enterprise Services definition

    2.1 Info-Tech’s Sample Enterprise Services definitions

    Included with this blueprint is Info-Tech’s Sample Enterprise Services definitions.

    The sample contains dozens of services common across most organizations; however, as a whole, they are not complete for every organization. They must be modified according to the business’ needs. Phase two will serve as a guide to identifying an enterprise service as well as how to fill out the necessary fields.

    This image contains a screenshot of definitions from Info-Tech's Sample Enterprises services

    Info-Tech Insight

    Keep track of which services you either modify or delete. You will have to change the same services in the final Info-Tech deliverable.

    The next slide will introduce you to the information for each service record that can be edited.

    Info-Tech’s Sample Enterprise Services definitions is designed to be easily customized

    2.1 Info-Tech’s Sample Enterprise Services definitions

    Below is an example of a service record and its necessary fields of information. This is information that can be kept, deleted, or expanded upon.

    Name the service unambiguously and from the user’s perspective.

    Brief description of how the service allows users to perform tasks.

    Describe the functionality of the service and how it helps users to achieve their business objectives.

    Cluster the services into logical groups.

    Service Name Description Features Category
    Email Email communication to connect with other employees, suppliers, and customers
    • Inbox
    • Calendar
    • Resource Scheduling (meeting rooms)
    • Access to shared mailboxes
    • Limit on mailbox size (‘x’ GB)
    • Address book/external contacts
    • Spam filtering, virus protection
    • Archiving and retrieval of older emails
    • Web/browser access to email
    • Mass email/notification (emergency, surveys, reporting)
    • Setting up a distribution list
    • Setting up Active Sync for email access on mobile devices
    Communications

    Distinguish between a feature and a unique service

    It can be difficult to determine what is considered a service itself, and what is a feature of another service. Use these tips and examples below to help you standardize this judgement.

    Example 1

    Web Conferencing has already been defined as a service. Is Audio Conferencing its own service or a feature of Web Conferencing?

    Info-Tech Tip: Is Audio Conferencing run by the same application as the Web Conferencing? Does it use the same equipment? If not, Audio Conferencing is probably its own service.

    Example 2

    Web Conferencing has already been defined as a service. Is “Screen Sharing” its own service or a feature of Web Conferencing?

    Info-Tech Tip: It depends on how the user interacts with Screen Sharing. Do they only screen share when engaged in a Web Conference? If so, Screen Sharing is a feature and not a service itself.

    Example 3

    VoIP is a popular alternative to landline telephone nowadays, but should it be part of the telephony service or a separate service?

    Info-Tech Tip: It depends on how the VoIP phone is set up.

    If the user uses the VoIP phone the same way they would use a landline phone – because the catalog is user facing – consider the VoIP as part of the telephone service.

    If the user uses their computer application to call and receive calls, consider this a separate service on its own.

    Info-Tech Insight

    While there are some best practices for coming up with service definitions, it is not an exact science and you cannot accommodate everyone. When in doubt, think how most users would perceive the service.

    Change or delete Info-Tech’s enterprise services definitions to make them your own

    2.1 3 hours

    You need to be as comprehensive as possible and try to capture the entire breadth of services IT provides to the business.

    To achieve this, a three-step process is recommended.

    1. First, assemble your project team. It is imperative to have representatives from the service desk. Host two separate workshops, one with the business and one with IT. These workshops should take the form of focus groups and should take no more than 1-2 hours.
    2. Business Focus Group:
    • In an open-forum setting, discuss what the business needs from IT to carry out their day-to-day activities.
    • Engage user-group representatives and business relationship managers.

    IT Focus Group:

    • In a similar open-forum setting, determine what IT delivers to the business. Don’t think about it from a support perspective, but from an “ask” perspective – e.g. “Service Requests.
    • Engage the following individuals: team leads, managers, directors.
  • Review results from the focus groups and compare with your service desk tickets – are there services users inquire about frequently that are not included? Finalize your list of enterprise services as a group.
  • INPUT

    • Modify Info-Tech’s sample services

    OUTPUT

    • A list of some of your business’ enterprise services

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/marker
    • Info-Tech sample enterprise services

    Participants

    • Key members of the project team
    • Service desk rep
    • Business rep

    Using Info-Tech’s Sample Enterprise Services, expand upon the services to add those that we did not include

    2.2 1-3 hours (depending on size and complexity of the IT department)

    Have your user hat on when documenting service features and descriptions. Try to imagine how the users interact with each service.

    1. Once you have your service name, start with the service feature. This field lists all the functionality the service provides. Think from the user’s perspective and document the IT-related activities they need to complete.
    2. Review the service feature fields with internal IT first to make sure there isn’t any information that IT doesn’t want to publish. Afterwards, review with business users to ensure the language is easy to understand and the features are relatable.
    3. Lastly, create a high-level service description that defines the nature of the service in one or two sentences.

    INPUT

    • Collaborate and discuss to expand on Info-Tech’s example

    OUTPUT

    • A complete list of your business’ enterprise services

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/marker
    • Info-Tech sample enterprise services

    Participants

    • Key members of the project team
    • Service desk rep
    • Business rep

    Follow Info-Tech’s guidelines to establish categories for the enterprise services that IT provides to the business

    Similar to the services and their features, there is no right or wrong way to categorize. The best approach is to do what makes sense for your organization and understand what your users think.

    What are Service Categories?

    Categories organize services into logical groups that the users can identify with. Services with similar functions are grouped together in a common category.

    When deciding your categories, think about:

    • What is best for the users?
    • Look at the workflows from the user perspective: how and why do they use the service?
    • Will the user connect with the category name?
    • Will they think about the services within the category?
    Enterprise Service Categories
    Accounts and Access
    Collaboration
    Communication
    Connectivity
    Consulting
    Desktop, Equipment, & Software
    Employee Services
    Files and Documents
    Help & Support
    Training

    Sample categories

    Categorize the services from the list below; how would you think to group them?

    There is no right or wrong way to categorize services; it is subjective to how they are provided by IT and how they are used by the business. Use the aforementioned categories to group the following services. Sample solutions are provided on the following slide.

    Service Name
    Telephone
    Email
    Remote access
    Internet
    BYOD (wireless access)
    Instant Messaging
    Video Conferencing
    Audio Conferencing
    Guest Wi-Fi
    Document Sharing

    Tips and tricks:

    1. Think about the technology behind the service. Is it the same application that provides the services? For example: is instant messaging run by the same application as email?
    2. Consider how the service is used by the business. Are two services always used together? If instant messaging is always used during video conferencing, then they belong in the same category.
    3. Consider the purpose of the services. Do they achieve the same outcomes? For example, document sharing is different from video conferencing, though they both support a collaborative working environment.

    This is a sample of different categorizations – use these examples to think about which would better suit your business

    Example 1 Example 2

    Desktop, Equipment, & Software Services

    Connectivity

    Mobile Devices

    Communications

    Internet

    Telephone

    BYOD (wireless access)

    Telephone

    Guest Wi-Fi

    Internet

    Email

    Remote Access

    Instant Messaging

    Video Conferencing

    Audio Conferencing

    Communications

    Collaboration

    Storage and Retrieval

    Accounts and Access

    Telephone

    Email

    Document Sharing

    Remote access

    Email

    Instant Messaging

    Connectivity

    Mobile Devices

    Video Conferencing

    Internet

    BYOD (wireless access)

    Audio Conferencing

    Guest Wi-Fi

    Guest Wi-Fi

    Document Sharing

    Info-Tech Insight

    Services can have multiple categories only if it means the users will be better off. Try to limit this as much as possible.

    Neither of these two examples are the correct answer, and no such thing exists. The answers you came up with may well be better suited for the users in your business.

    With key members of your project team, categorize the list of enterprise services you have created

    2.3 1 hour

    Before you start, you must have a modified list of all defined enterprise services and a modified list of categories.

    1. Write down the service names on sticky notes and write down the categories either on the whiteboard or on the flipchart.
    2. Assign the service to a category one at a time. For each service, obtain consensus on how the users would view the service and which category would be the most logical choice. In some cases, discuss whether a service should be included in two categories to create better searchability for the users.
    3. If a consensus could not be reached on how to categorize a service, review the service features and category name. In some cases, you may go back and change the features or modify or create new categories if needed.

    INPUT

    • Collaborate and discuss to expand on Info-Tech’s example

    OUTPUT

    • A complete list of your business’ enterprise services

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/marker
    • Info-Tech sample enterprise services

    Participants

    • Key members of the project team
    • Service desk rep
    • Business rep

    Accounts & Access Services

    • User ID & Access
    • Remote Access
    • Business Applications Access

    Communication Services

    • Telephone
    • Email
    • Mobile devices

    Files & Documents

    • Shared Folders
    • File Storage
    • File Restoration
    • File Archiving

    Collaboration

    • Web Conferencing
    • Audio Conferencing
    • Video Conferencing
    • Chat
    • Document Sharing

    Employee Services

    • Onboarding & Off Boarding
    • Benefits Self Service
    • Time and Attendance
    • Employee Records Management

    Help & Support

    • Service Desk
    • Desk Side Support
    • After Hours Support

    Desktop, Equipment, & Software

    • Printing
    • Hardware Provisioning
    • Software Provisioning
    • Software Support
    • Device Move
    • Equipment Loaner

    Education & Training Services

    • Desktop Application Training
    • Corporate Application Training
    • Clinical Application Training
    • IT Training Consultation

    Connectivity

    • BYOD (wireless access)
    • Internet
    • Guest Wi-Fi

    IT Consulting Services

    • Project Management
    • Analysis
    • RFP Reviews
    • Solution Development
    • Business Analysis/Requirements Gathering
    • RFI/RFP Evaluation
    • Security Consulting & Assessment
    • Contract Management
    • Contract Negotiation

    IT department identifies a comprehensive list of enterprise services

    CASE STUDY A
    Industry Government
    Source Onsite engagement

    Challenge

    Because of the breadth of services IT provides across several agencies, it was challenging to identify what was considered enterprise beyond just the basic ones (email, internet, etc.)

    IT recognized that although the specific tasks of service could be different, there are many services that are offered universally across the organization and streamlining the service request and delivery process would reduce the burden on IT.

    Solution

    The client began with services that users interact with on a daily basis; this includes email, wireless, telephone, internet, printing, etc.

    Then, they focused on common service requests from the users, such as software and hardware provisioning, as well as remote access.

    Lastly, they began to think of other IT services that are provided across the organization, such as RFP/RFI support, project management analysis, employee onboarding/off-boarding, etc.

    Results

    By going through the lists and enterprise categories, the government was able to come up with a comprehensive list of all services IT provides to the business.

    Classifying services such as onboarding meant that IT could now standardize IT services for new recruits and employee termination.

    By capturing all enterprise services offered to the organization, IT centralized its management of services instead of having scattered request processes.

    Organization distinguishes features from services using Info-Tech’s tips and techniques

    CASE STUDY B
    Industry Government
    Source Onsite engagement

    Challenge

    For some services, the project team had difficulty deciding on what was a service and what was a feature. They found it hard to distinguish between a service with features or multiple services.

    For example, the client struggled to define the Wi-Fi services because they had many different user groups and different processes to obtain the service. Patients, visitors, doctors, researchers, and corporate employees all use Wi-Fi, but the service features for each user group were different.

    Solution

    The Info-Tech analyst came on-site and engaged the project team in a discussion around how the users would view the services.

    The analyst also provided tips and techniques on identifying services and their features.

    Because patients and visitors do not access Wi-Fi or receive support for the service in the same way as clinical or corporate employees, Wi-Fi was separated into two services (one for each user group).

    Results

    Using the tips and techniques that were provided during the onsite engagement, the project team was able to have a high degree of clarity on how to define the services by articulating who the authorized users are, and how to access the process.

    This allowed the group to focus on the users’ perspective and create clear, unambiguous service features so that users could clearly understand eligibility requirements for the service and how to request them.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts

    this is a picture of an Info-Tech Analyst

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.
    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:
    2.1 This image contains a screenshot from section 2.1 of this blueprint.

    Understand what enterprise services are

    The project team must have a clear understanding of what qualifies as an enterprise service. The onsite analysts will also promote a user-oriented mindset so the catalog focuses on business needs.

    2.2 this image contains a screenshot from section 2.2 of this blueprint.

    Identify enterprise services

    The Info-Tech analysts will provide a list of ready-to-use services and will work with the project team to change, add, and delete service definitions and to customize the service features.

    2.3 this image contains a screenshot from section 2.3 of this blueprint.

    Identify categories for enterprise services

    The Info-Tech analyst will again emphasize the importance of being service-oriented rather than IT-oriented. This will allow the group to come up with categories that are intuitive to the users.

    PHASE 3

    Identify and Define Line of Business Services

    Design & Build a User-Facing Service Catalog

    Step 3 – Create Line of Business Services Definitions

    1. Complete the Project Charter
    2. Create Enterprise Services Definitions
    3. Create Line of Business Services Definitions
    4. Complete Service Definitions

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify lines of business (LOB) within the organization as well as the user groups within the different LOBs.
    • Determine which one of Info-Tech’s two approaches is more suitable for your IT organization.
    • Define and document LOB services using the appropriate approach.
    • Categorize the LOB services based on the organization’s functional structure.

    Step Insights

    • Collaboration with the business significantly strengthens the quality of line of business service definitions. A significant amount of user input is crucial to create impactful and effective service definitions.
    • If a strong relationship with the business is not in place, IT can look at business applications and the business activities they support in order to understand how to define line of business services.

    Phase 3 outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 3: Define LOB Services

    Proposed Time to Completion: 4 weeks

    Step 3.1: Identify LOB services

    Step 3.2: Define LOB services

    Start with an analyst kick off call:

    • Identify enterprise services that are commonly used.
    • Ensure the list is comprehensive and capture common IT needs.
    • Create service descriptions and features.

    Review findings with analyst:

    • Use either the business view or the IT view methodology to identify and define LOB services.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Select one of the methodologies and either compile a list of business applications or a list of user groups/functional departments.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Validate the service definitions and features with business users.

    With these tools & templates: Service

    LOB Services – Functional Group
    LOB Services – Industry Specific

    With these tools & templates:

    LOB Services – Functional Group
    LOB Services – Industry Specific

    Communicate with your business users to get a clear picture of each line of business

    Within a business unit, there are user groups that use unique applications and IT services to perform business activities. IT must understand which group is consuming each service to document to their needs and requirements. Only then is it logical to group services into lines of business.

    Covering every LOB service is a difficult task. Info-Tech offers two approaches to identifying LOB services, though we recommend working alongside business user groups to have input on how each service is used directly from the users. Doing so makes the job of completing the service catalog easier, and the product more detailed and user friendly.

    Some helpful questions to keep in mind when characterizing user groups:

    • Where do they fall on the organizational chart?
    • What kind of work do they do?
    • What is included in their job description?
    • What are tasks that they do in addition to their formal responsibilities?
    • What do they need from IT to do their day-to-day tasks?
    • What does their work day look like?
    • When, why, and how do they use IT services?

    Info-Tech Insight

    With business user input, you can answer questions as specific as “What requirements are necessary for IT to deliver value to each line of business?” and “What does each LOB need in order to run their operation?”

    Understand when it is best to use one of Info-Tech’s two approaches to defining LOB services

    1. Business View

    Business View is the preferred method for IT departments with a better understanding of business operations. This is because they can begin with input from the user, enabling them to more successfully define every service for each user group and LOB.

    In addition, IT will also have a chance to work together with the business and this will improve the level of collaboration and communication. However, in order to follow this methodology, IT needs to have a pre-established relationship with the business and can demonstrate their knowledge of business applications.

    2. IT View

    The IT view begins with considering each business application used within the organization’s lines of business. Start with a broad view, following with a process of narrowing down, and then iterate for each business application.

    This process leads to each unique service performed by every application within the business’ LOBs.

    The IT view does not necessarily require a substantial amount of information about the business procedures. IT staff are capable of deducing what business users often require to maintain their applications’ functionality.

    Use one of Info-Tech’s two methodologies to help you identify each LOB service

    Choose the methodology that fits your IT organization’s knowledge of the business.

    This image demonstrates a comparison between the business view of service and the IT View of Service. Under the Business View, the inputs are LOB; User Groups; and Business Activity. Under the IT View, the inputs are Business Application and Functionality, and the outputs are Business Activity; User Groups; and LOB.

    1. Business View

    If you do have knowledge of business operations, using the business view is the better option and the service definition will be more relatable to the users.

    2. IT View

    For organizations that don’t have established relationships with the business or detailed knowledge of business activities, IT can decompose the application into services. They have more familiarity and comfort with the business applications than with business activities.

    It is important to continue after the service is identified because it helps confirm and solidify the names and features. Determining the business activity and the user groups can help you become more user-oriented.

    Identifying LOB services using Info-Tech’s Business View method

    We will illustrate the two methodologies with the same example.

    If you have established an ongoing relationship with the business and you are familiar with their business operations, starting with the LOB and user groups will ensure you cover all the services IT provides to the business and create more relatable service names.

    This is a screenshot of an example of the business view of Service.

    Identifying LOB services using Info-Tech’s IT View method

    If you want to understand what services IT provides to the Sales functional group, and you don’t have comprehensive knowledge of the department, you need to start with the IT perspective.

    This is a screenshot of an example of the business view of Service.

    Info-Tech Insight

    If you are concerned about the fact that people always associate a service with an application, you can include the application in the service name or description so users can find the service through a search function.

    Group LOB services into functional groups as you did enterprise services into categories

    3.1 Sample Line of Business Services Definitions – Functional Groups & Industry Examples

    Like categories for enterprise services in Phase Two, LOB services are grouped into functional groups. Functional groups are the components of an organizational chart (HR, Finance, etc.) that are found in a company’s structure.

    Functional Groups

    Functional groups enable a clear view for business users of what services they need, while omitting services that do not apply to them. This does not overwhelm them, and provides them with only relevant information.

    Industry Services

    To be clear, industry services can be put into functional groups.

    Info-Tech provides a few sample industry services (without their functional group) to give an idea of what LOB service is specific to these industries. Try to extrapolate from these examples to create LOB services for your business.

    Use Info-Tech’s Sample LOB Services – Functional Group and Sample LOB Services – Industry Specific documents.

    This is a screenshot of Info-Tech's Functional Group Services

    Info-Tech Insight

    Keep track of which services you either modify or delete. You will have to change the same services in the final Info-Tech deliverable.

    Identify the user group and business activity within each line of business – Business view

    3.1 30-45 minutes per line of business

    Only perform this activity if you have a relationship with the business that can enable you to generate business input on service identifications and definitions.

    In a group of your project participants, repeat the sequence for each LOB.

    1. Brainstorm each user group within the LOB that is creating value for the business by performing functional activities.
    2. Think of what each individual end user must do to create their value. Think of the bigger picture rather than specifics at this point. For example, sales representatives must communicate with clients to create value.
    3. Now that you have each user group and the activities they perform, consider the specifics of how they go about doing that activity. Consider each application they use and how much they use that application. Think of any and all IT services that could occur as a result of that application usage.

    INPUT

    • A collaborative discussion (with a business relationship)

    OUTPUT

    • LOB services defined from the business perspective

    Materials

    • Sticky notes
    • Whiteboard/marker

    Participants

    • Members of the project team
    • Representatives from the LOBs

    Identify the user group and business activity within each line of business – IT view

    3.1 30-45 minutes per application

    Only perform this activity if you cannot generate business input through your relationships, and must begin service definitions with business applications.

    In a group of your project participants, repeat the sequence for each application.

    1. Brainstorm all applications that the business provides through IT. Cross out the ones that provide enterprise services.
    2. In broad terms, think about what the application is accomplishing to create value for the business from IT’s perspective. What are the modules? Is it recording interactions with the clients? Each software can have multiple functionalities.
    3. Narrow down each functionality performed by the application and think about how IT helps deliver that value. Create a name for the service that the users can relate to and understand.
    4. → Optional

    5. Now go beyond the service and think about the business activities. They are always similar to IT’s application functionality, but from the user perspective. How would the user think about what the application’s functionality to accomplish that particular service is? At this point, focus on the service, not the application.
    6. Determine the user groups for each service. This step will help you complete the service record design in phase 4. Keep in mind that multiple user groups may access one service.

    INPUT

    • A collaborative discussion (without a business relationship)

    OUTPUT

    • LOB services defined from the IT perspective

    Materials

    • Sticky notes
    • Whiteboard/marker

    Participants

    • Members of the project team

    You must review your LOB service definitions with the business before deployment

    Coming up with LOB service definitions is challenging for IT because it requires comprehension of all lines of business within the organization as well as direct interaction with the business users.

    After completing the LOB service definitions, IT must talk to the business to ensure all the user groups and business activities are covered and all the features are accurate.

    Here are some tips to reviewing your LOB Service Catalog generated content:

    • If you plan to talk to a business SME, plan ahead to help complete the project in time for rollout.
    • Include a business relationship manager on the project team to facilitate discussion if you do not have an established relationship with the business.

    Sample Meeting Agenda

    Go through the service in batches. Present 5-10 related services to the business first. Start with the service name and then focus on the features.

    In the meeting, discuss whether the service features accurately sum up the business activities, or if there are missing key activities. Also discuss whether certain services should be split up into multiple services or combined into one.

    Organization identifies LOB services using Info-Tech’s methodologies

    CASE STUDY A
    Industry Government
    Source Onsite engagement

    Challenge

    There were many users from different LOBs, and IT provided multiple services to all of them. Tracking them and who had access to what was difficult.

    IT didn’t understand who provided the services (service owner) and who the customers were (business owner) for some of the services.

    Solution

    After identifying the different Lines of Business, they followed the first approach (Business View) for those that IT had sufficient knowledge of in terms of business operations:

    1. Identified lines of business
    2. Identified user groups
    3. Identified business activities

    For the LOBs they weren’t familiar with, they used the IT view method, beginning with the application:

    1. Identified business apps
    2. Deduced the functionalities of each application
    3. Traced the application back to the service and identified the service owner and business owner

    Results

    Through these two methodologies, IT was able to define services according to how the users both perceive and utilize them.

    IT was able to capture all the services it provides to each line of business effectively without too much help from the business representatives.

    By capturing all enterprise services offered to the organization, IT centralized its management of services instead of having scattered request processes.

    Info-Tech helps organization to identify LOB services using the IT View

    CASE STUDY B
    Industry Healthcare
    Source Onsite engagement

    Challenge
    The organization uses a major application containing several modules used by different users for various business activities.

    The challenge was to break down the application into multiple services in a way that makes sense to the business users. Users should be able to find services specific to them easily.

    Therefore, the project team must understand how to map the modules to different services and user groups.


    Solution
    The project team identified the major lines of business and took various user groups such as nurses and doctors, figured out their daily tasks that require IT services, and mapped each user-facing service to the functionality of the application.

    The project team then went back to the application to ensure all the modules and functionalities within the application were accounted for. This helped to ensure that services for all user groups were covered and prepared to be released in the catalog.


    Results
    Once the project team had come up with a comprehensive list of services for each line of business, they were able to sit with the business and review the services.

    IT was also able to use this opportunity to demonstrate all the services it provides. Having all the LOB services demonstrates IT has done its preparation and can show the value they help create for the business in a language the users can understand. The end result was a strengthened relationship between the business and the IT department.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts

    This is a picture of an Info-Tech Analyst

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.
    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:
    3.1 this image contains a screenshot from section 3.1 of this blueprint.

    Understand what Line of Business services are

    The onsite analysts will provide a clear distinction between enterprise services and LOB services. The analysts will also articulate the importance of validating LOB services with the business.

    3.2 this image contains a screenshot from section 3.2 of this blueprint.

    Identify LOB services using the business’ view

    There are two methods for coming up with LOB services. If IT has comprehensive knowledge of the business, they can identify the services by outlining the user groups and their business activities.

    3.3 This image contains a screenshot from section 3.3 of this blueprint.

    Identify LOB services using IT’s view

    If IT does not understand the business and cannot obtain business input, Info-Tech’s analysts will present the second method, which allows IT to identify services with more comfortability through business applications/systems.

    3.4 This image contains a screenshot from section 3.4 of this blueprint.

    Categorize the LOB services into functional groups

    The analysts will help the project team categorize the LOB services based on user groups or functional departments.

    PHASE 4

    Complete Service Definitions

    Design & Build a User-Facing Service Catalog

    Step 4: Complete service definitions and service record design

    1. Complete the Project Charter
    2. Create Enterprise Services Definitions
    3. Create Line of Business Services Definitions
    4. Complete Service Definitions

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Select which fields of information you would like to include in your service catalog design.
    • Determine which fields should be kept internal for IT use only.
    • Complete the service record design with business input if possible.

    Step Insights

    • Don’t overcomplicate the service record design. Only include the pieces of information the users really need to see.
    • Don’t publish anything that you don’t want to be held accountable for. If you are not ready, keep the metrics and costs internal.
    • It is crucial to designate a facilitator and a decision maker so confusions and disagreements regarding service definitions can be resolved efficiently.

    Phase 3 outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 4: Complete service definitions
    Proposed Time to Completion (in weeks): 4 weeks

    Step 4.1: Design service record

    Step 4.2: Complete service definitions

    Start with an analyst kick off call:

    • Review Info-Tech’s sample service record and determine which fields to add/change/delete.
    • Determine which fields should be kept internal.

    Review findings with analyst:

    • Complete all fields in the service record for each identified service.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Finalize the design of the service record and bring over enterprise services and LOB services.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Test the service definitions with business users prior to catalog implementation.

    With these tools & templates: Service

    Services Definition Chart

    With these tools & templates:

    Services Definition Chart

    Utilize Info-Tech’s Services Definition Chart to map out your final service catalog design

    Info-Tech’s Sample Services Definition Chart

    Info-Tech has provided a sample Services Definition Chart with standard service definitions and pre-populated fields. It is up to you throughout this step to decide which fields are necessary to your business users, as well as how much detail you wish to include in each of them.

    This image contains a screenshot from Info-Tech's Services Definition Chart.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Keep track of which services you either modify or delete. You will have to change the same services in the final Info-Tech deliverable.

    Tips and techniques for service record design

    The majority of the fields in the service catalog are user facing, which means they must be written in business language that the users can understand.

    If there is any confusion or disagreement in filling out the fields, a facilitator is required to lead the working groups in coming up with a definitive answer. If a decision is still not reached, it should be escalated to the decision maker (usually the service owner).

    IT-Facing Fields

    There are IT facing fields that should not be published to the business users – they are for the benefit of IT. For example, you may want to keep Performance Metrics internal to IT until you are ready to discuss it with the business.

    If the organization is interested in creating a Technical Service Catalog following this initiative, these fields will provide a helpful starting place for IT to identify the people, process, and technology required to support user-facing services.

    Info-Tech Insight

    It is important for IT-facing fields to be kept internal. If business users are having trouble with a service and the service owner’s name is available to them, they will phone them for support even if they are not the support owner.

    Design your service catalog with business input: have the user in mind

    When completing the service record, adopt the principle that “Less is More.” Keep it simple and write the service description from the user’s perspective, without IT language. From the list below, pick which fields of information are important to your business users.

    What do the users need to access the service quickly and with minimal assistance?

    The depicted image contains an example of an analysis of what users need to access the service quickly and with minimal assistance. The contents are as follows. Under Service Overview, Name; Description; Features; Category; and Supporting Services. Under Owners, are Service Owner; Business Owner. Under Access Policies and Procedures, are Authorized Users; Request Process; Approval Requirements/Process; Turnaround Time; User Responsibility. Under Availability and Service Levels are Support Hours; Hours of Availability; Planned Downtime; and Metrics. Under Support Policies & Procedures are Support Process; Support Owner; Support Documentation. Under Costs are Internal Cost; Customer Cost. The items which are IT Facing are coloured Red. These include Supporting Services; Service Owner; Business Owner; Metrics; Support Owner; and Internal Cost.

    Identify service overview

    “What information must I have in each service record? What are the fundamentals required to define a service?”

    Necessary Fields – Service Description:

    • Service name → a title for the service that gives a hint of its purpose.
    • Service description → what the service does and expected outcomes.
    • Service features → describe functionality of the service.
    • Service category → an intuitive way to group the service.
    • Support services → applications/systems required to support the service.

    Description: Delivers electronic messages to and from employees.

    Features:

    • Desk phone
    • Teleconference phones (meeting rooms)
    • Voicemail
    • Recover deleted voicemails
    • Team line: call rings multiple phones/according to call tree
    • Employee directory
    • Caller ID, Conference calling

    Category: Communications

    This image contains an example of a Service overview table. The headings are: Description; Features; Category; Supporting Services (Systems, Applications).

    Identify owners

    Who is responsible for the delivery of the service and what are their roles?

    Service Owner and Business Owner

    Service owner → the IT member who is responsible and accountable for the delivery of the service.

    Business owner → the business partner of the service owner who ensures the provided service meets business needs.

    Example: Time Entry

    Service Owner: Manager of Business Solutions

    Business Owner: VP of Human Resources

    This image depicts a blank table with the headings Service Owner, and Business Owner

    Info-Tech Insight

    For enterprise services that are used by almost everyone in the organization, the business owner is the CIO.

    Identify access policies and procedures

    “Who is authorized to access this service? How do they access it?”

    Access Policies & Procedures

    Authorized users → who can access the service.

    Request process → how to request access to the service.

    Approval requirement/process → what the user needs to have in place before accessing the service.

    Example: Guest Wi-Fi

    Authorized Users: All people on site not working for the company

    Request Process: Self-Service through website for external visitors

    Approval Requirement/Process: N/A

    This image depicts a blank table with the headings: Authorized Users; Request Process; Approval Requirement/Process

    Info-Tech Insight

    Clearly defining how to access a service saves time and money by decreasing calls to the service desk and getting users up and running faster. The result is higher user productivity.

    Identify access policies and procedures

    “Who is authorized to access this service? How do they access it?”

    Access Policies & Procedures

    Requirements & pre-requisites → details of what must happen before a service can be provided.

    Turnaround time → how much time it will take to grant access to the service.

    User responsibility → What the user is expected to do to acquire the service.

    Example: Guest Wi-Fi

    Requirements & Pre-requisites: Disclaimer of non-liability and acceptance

    Turnaround time: Immediate

    User Responsibility: Adhering to policies outlined in the disclaimer

    This image depicts a blank table with the headings: Authorized Users; Request Process; Approval Requirement/Process

    Info-Tech Insight

    Clearly defining how to access a service saves time and money by decreasing calls to the service desk and getting users up and running faster. The result is higher user productivity.

    Identify availability and service levels

    “When is this service available to users? What service levels can the user expect?”

    Availability & Service Levels

    Support hours → what days/times is this service available to users?

    Hours of availability/planned downtime → is there scheduled downtime for maintenance?

    Performance metrics → what level of performance can the user expect for this service?

    Example: Software Provisioning

    Support Hours: Standard business hours

    Hours of Availability/Planned Downtime: Standard business hours; can be agreed to work beyond operating hours either earlier or later

    Performance Metrics: N/A

    This image depicts a blank table with the headings: Support hours; Hours of availability/planned downtime; Performance Metrics.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Manage user expectations by clearly documenting and communicating service levels.

    Identify support policies and procedures

    “How do I obtain support for this service?”

    Support Policies & Procedures

    Support process → what is the process for obtaining support for this service?

    Support owner → who can users contact for escalations regarding this service?

    Support documentation → where can users find support documentation for this service?

    Example: Shared Folders

    Support Process: Contact help desk or submit a ticket via portal

    Support Owner: Manager, client support

    Support Documentation: .pdf of how-to guide

    This image depicts a blank table with the headings: Support Process; Support Owner; Support Documentation

    Info-Tech Insight

    Clearly documenting support procedures enables users to get the help they need faster and more efficiently.

    Identify service costs and approvals

    “Is there a cost for this service? If so, how much and who is expensing it?”

    Costs

    Internal Cost → do we know the total cost of the service?

    Customer Cost → a lot of services are provided without charge to the business; however, certain service requests will be charged to a department’s budget.

    Example: Hardware Provisioning

    Internal Cost: For purposes of audit, new laptops will be expensed to IT.

    Customer Cost: Cost to rush order 10 new laptops with retina displays for the graphics team. Charged for extra shipment cost, not for cost of laptop.

    This image depicts a blank table with the headings: Internal Costs; Customer costs

    Info-Tech Insight

    Set user expectations by clearly documenting costs associated with a service and how to obtain approval for these costs if required.

    Complete the service record design fields for every service

    4.1 3 Hours

    This is the final activity to completing the service record design. It has been a long journey to make it here; now, all that is left is completing the fields and transferring information from previous activities.

    1. Organize the services however you think is most appropriate. A common method of organization is alphabetically by enterprise category, and then each LOB functional group.
    2. Determine which fields you would like to keep or edit to be part of your design. Also add any other fields you can think of which will add value to the user or IT. Remember to keep them IT facing if necessary.
    3. Complete the fields for each service one by one. Keep in mind that for some services, a field or two may not apply to the nature of that service and may be left blank or filled with a null value (e.g. N/A).

    INPUT

    • A collaborative discussion

    OUTPUT

    • Completed service record design ready for a catalog

    Materials

    • Info-Tech sample service record design.

    Participants

    • Project stakeholders, business representatives

    Info-Tech Insight

    Don’t forget to delete or bring over the edited LOB and Enterprise services from the phase 2 and 3 deliverables.

    Complete the service definitions and get them ready for publication

    Now that you have completed the first run of service definitions, you can go back and complete the rest of the identified services in batches. You should observe increased efficiency and effectiveness in filling out the service definitions.

    This image depicts how you can use bundles to simplify the process of catalog design using bundles. The cycle includes the steps: Identify Services; Select a Service Bundle; Review Record Design; followed by a cycle of: Pick a service; Service X; Service Data Collection; Create Service Record, followed by Publish the bundle; Communicate the bundle; Rinse and Repeat.

    This blueprint’s purpose is to help you design a service catalog. There are a number of different platforms to build the catalog offered by application vendors. The sophistication of the catalog depends on the size of your business. It may be as simple as an Excel book, or something as complex as a website integrated with your service desk.

    Determine how you want to publish the service catalog

    There are various levels of maturity to consider when you are thinking about how to deploy your service catalog.

    1. Website/User Portal 2. Catalog Module Within ITSM Tool

    3. Homegrown Solution

    Prerequisite

    An internet website, or a user portal

    An existing ITSM tool with a built-in service catalog module

    Database development capabilities

    Website development capabilities

    Pros

    Low cost

    Low effort

    Easy to deploy

    Customized solution tailored for the organization

    High flexibility regarding how the service catalog is published

    Cons

    Not aesthetically appealing

    Lacking sophistication

    Difficult to customize to organization’s needs

    Limitation on how the service catalog info is published

    High effort

    High cost

    → Maturity Level →

    Organization uses the service catalog to outline IT’s and users’ responsibilities

    CASE STUDY A
    Industry Government
    Source Onsite engagement

    Challenge

    The client had collected a lot of good information, but they were not sure about what to include to ensure the users could understand the service clearly.

    They were also not sure what to keep internal so the service catalog did not increase IT’s workload. They want to help the business, but not appear as if they are capable of solving everything for everyone immediately. There was a fear of over-commitment.

    Solution

    The government created a Customer Responsibility field for each service, so it was not just IT who was providing solutions. Business users needed to understand what they had to do to receive some services.

    The Service Owner and Business Owner fields were also kept internal so users would go through the proper request channel instead of calling Service Owners directly.

    Lastly, the Performance Metrics field was kept internal until IT was ready to present service metrics to the business.

    Results

    The business was provided clarity on their responsibility and what was duly owed to them by IT staff. This established clear boundaries on what was to be expected of IT services projected into the future.

    The business users knew what to do and how to obtain the services provided to them. In the meantime, they didn’t feel overwhelmed by the amount of information provided by the service catalog.

    Organization leverages the service catalog as a tool to define IT workflows and business processes

    CASE STUDY B
    Industry Healthcare
    Source Onsite engagement

    Challenge

    There is a lack of clarity and a lack of agreement between the client’s team members regarding the request/approval processes for certain services. This was an indication that there is a level of ambiguity around process. Members were not sure what was the proper way to access a service and could not come up with what to include in the catalog.

    Different people from different teams had different ways of accessing services. This could be true for both enterprise and LOB services.

    Solution

    The Info-Tech analyst facilitated a discussion about workflows and business processes.

    In particular, the discussion focused around the approval/authorization process, and IT’s workflows required to deliver the service. The Info-Tech analyst on site walked the client through their different processes to determine which one should be included in the catalog.

    Results

    The discussion brought clarity to the project team around both IT and business process. Using this new information, IT was able to communicate to the business better, and create consistency for IT and the users of the catalog.

    The catalog design was a shared space where IT and business users could confer what the due process and responsibilities were from both sides. This increased accountability for both parties.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts

    this is a picture of an Info-Tech Analyst

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.
    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:
    4.1 this image contains a screenshot from section 4.1 of this blueprint.

    Determine which fields should be included in the record design

    The analysts will present the sample service definitions record and facilitate a discussion to customize the service record so unique business needs are captured.

    4.2 this image contains a screenshot from section 4.2.1 of this blueprint.

    Determine which fields should be kept internal

    The onsite analysts will explain why certain fields are used but not published. The analysts will help the team determine which fields should be kept internal.

    4.3 this image contains a screenshot from section 4.3 of this blueprint.

    Complete the service definitions

    The Info-Tech analysts will help the group complete the full service definitions. This exercise will also provide the organization with a clear understanding of IT workflows and business processes.

    Summary of accomplishment

    Knowledge Gained

    • Understanding why it is important to identify and define services from the user’s perspective.
    • Understand the differences between enterprise services and line of business services.
    • Distinguish service features from services.
    • Involve the business users to define LOB services using either IT’s view or LOB’s view.

    Processes Optimized

    • Enterprise services identification and documentation.
    • Line of business services identification and documentation.

    Deliverables Completed

    • Service catalog project charter
    • Enterprise services definitions
    • Line of business service definitions – functional groups
    • Line of business service definitions – industry specific
    • Service definition chart

    Project step summary

    Client Project: Design and Build a User-Facing Service Catalog

    1. Launch the Project – Maximize project success by assembling a well-rounded team and managing all important stakeholders.
    2. Identify Enterprise Services – Identify services that are used commonly across the organization and categorize them in a user-friendly way.
    3. Identify Line of Business Services – Identify services that are specific to each line of business using one of two Info-Tech methodologies.
    4. Complete the Service Definitions – Determine what should be presented to the users and complete the service definitions for all identified services.

    Info-Tech Insight

    This project has the ability to fit the following formats:

    • Onsite workshop by Info-Tech Research Group consulting analysts.
    • Do-it-yourself with your team.
    • Remote delivery (Info-Tech Guided Implementation).

    Related Info-Tech research

    Establish a Service-Based Costing Model

    Develop the right level of service-based costing capability by applying our methodology.

    Align Projects With the IT Change Lifecycle

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}464|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Operations Management
    • Parent Category Link: /i-and-o-process-management
    • Coordinate IT change and project management to successfully push changes to production.
    • Manage representation of project management within the scope of the change lifecycle to gather requirements, properly approve and implement changes, and resolve incidents that arise from failed implementations.
    • Communicate effectively between change management, project management, and the business.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Improvement can be incremental. You do not have to adopt every recommended improvement right away. Ensure every process change you make will create value and slowly add improvements to ease buy-in.

    Impact and Result

    • Establish pre-set touchpoints between IT change management and project management at strategic points in the change and project lifecycles.
    • Include appropriate project representation at the change advisory board (CAB).
    • Leverage standard change resources such as the change calendar and request for change form (RFC).

    Align Projects With the IT Change Lifecycle Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Align Projects With the IT Change Lifecycle Deck – A guide to walk through integrating project touchpoints in the IT change management lifecycle.

    Use this storyboard as a guide to align projects with your IT change management lifecycle.

    • Align Projects With the IT Change Lifecycle Storyboard

    2. The Change Management SOP – This template will ensure that organizations have a comprehensive document in place that can act as a point of reference for the program.

    Use this SOP as a template to document and maintain your change management practice.

    • Change Management Standard Operating Procedure
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Align Projects With the IT Change Lifecycle

    Increase the success of your changes by integrating project touchpoints in the change lifecycle.

    Analyst Perspective

    Focus on frequent and transparent communications between the project team and change management.

    Benedict Chang

    Misalignment between IT change management and project management leads to headaches for both practices. Project managers should aim to be represented in the change advisory board (CAB) to ensure their projects are prioritized and scheduled appropriately. Advanced notice on project progress allows for fewer last-minute accommodations at implementation. Widespread access of the change calendar can also lead project management to effectively schedule projects to give change management advanced notice.

    Moreover, alignment between the two practices at intake allows for requests to be properly sorted, whether they enter change management directly or are governed as a project.

    Lastly, standardizing implementation and post-implementation across everyone involved ensures more successful changes and socialized/documented lessons learned for when implementations do not go well.

    Benedict Chang
    Senior Research Analyst, Infrastructure and Operations
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    Common Obstacles

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    To align projects with the change lifecycle, IT leaders must:

    • Coordinate IT change and project management to successfully push changes to production.
    • Manage representation of project management within the scope of the change lifecycle to gather requirements, properly approve and implement changes, and resolve incidents that arise from failed implementations.
    • Communicate effectively between change management, project management, and the business.

    Loose definitions may work for clear-cut examples of changes and projects at intake, but grey-area requests end up falling through the cracks.

    Changes to project scope, when not communicated, often leads to scheduling conflicts at go-live.

    Too few checkpoints between change and project management can lead to conflicts. Too many checkpoints can lead to delays.

    Set up touchpoints between IT change management and project management at strategic points in the change and project lifecycles.

    Include appropriate project representation at the change advisory board (CAB).

    Leverage standard change resources such as the change calendar and request for change form (RFC).

    Info-Tech Insight

    Improvement can be incremental. You do not have to adopt every recommended improvement right away. Ensure every process change you make will create value, and slowly add improvements to ease buy-in.

    Info-Tech’s approach

    Use the change lifecycle to identify touchpoints.

    The image contains a screenshot of Info-Tech's approach.

    The Info-Tech difference:

    1. Start with your change lifecycle to define how change control can align with project management.
    2. Make improvements to project-change alignment to benefit the relationship between the two practices and the practices individually.
    3. Scope the alignment to your organization. Take on the improvements to the left one by one instead of overhauling your current process.

    Use this research to improve your current process

    This deck is intended to align established processes. If you are just starting to build IT change processes, see the related research below.

    Align Projects With the IT Change Lifecycle

    02 Optimize IT Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization

    01 Optimize IT Change Management

    Increase the success of your changes by integrating project touchpoints in your change lifecycle.

    (You are here)

    Decide which IT projects to approve and when to start them.

    Right-size IT change management to protect the live environment.

    Successful change management will provide benefits to both the business and IT

    Respond to business requests faster while reducing the number of change-related disruptions.

    IT Benefits

    Business Benefits

    • Fewer incidents and outages at project go-live
    • Upfront identification of project and change requirements
    • Higher rate of change and project success
    • Less rework
    • Fewer service desk calls related to failed go-lives
    • Fewer service disruptions
    • Faster response to requests for new and enhanced functionalities
    • Higher rate of benefits realization when changes are implemented
    • Lower cost per change
    • Fewer “surprise” changes disrupting productivity

    IT satisfaction with change management will drive business satisfaction with IT. Once the process is working efficiently, staff will be more motivated to adhere to the process, reducing the number of unauthorized changes. As fewer changes bypass proper evaluation and testing, service disruptions will decrease and business satisfaction will increase.

    Change management improves core benefits to the business: the four Cs

    Most organizations have at least some form of change control in place, but formalizing change management leads to the four Cs of business benefits:

    Control

    Collaboration

    Consistency

    Confidence

    Change management brings daily control over the IT environment, allowing you to review every relatively new change, eliminate changes that would have likely failed, and review all changes to improve the IT environment.

    Change management planning brings increased communication and collaboration across groups by coordinating changes with business activities. The CAB brings a more formalized and centralized communication method for IT.

    Request-for-change templates and a structured process result in implementation, test, and backout plans being more consistent. Implementing processes for pre-approved changes also ensures these frequent changes are executed consistently and efficiently.

    Change management processes will give your organization more confidence through more accurate planning, improved execution of changes, less failure, and more control over the IT environment. This also leads to greater protection against audits.

    1. Alignment at intake

    Define what is a change and what is a project.

    Both changes and projects will end up in change control in the end. Here, we define the intake.

    Changes and projects will both go to change control when ready to go live. However, defining the governance needed at intake is critical.

    A change should be governed by change control from beginning to end. It would typically be less than a week’s worth of work for a SME to build and come in at a nominal cost (e.g. <$20k over operating costs).

    Projects on the other hand, will be governed by project management in terms of scope, scheduling, resourcing, etc. Projects typically take over a week and/or cost more. However, the project, when ready to go live, should still be scheduled through change control to avoid any conflicts at implementation. At triage and intake, a project can be further scoped based on projected scale.

    This initial touchpoint between change control and project management is crucial to ensure tasks and request are executed with the proper governance. To distinguish between changes and projects at intake, list examples of each and determine what resourcing separates changes from projects.

    Need help scoping projects? Download the Project Intake Classification Matrix

    Change

    Project

    • Smaller scale task that typically takes a short time to build and test
    • Generates a single change request
    • Governed by IT Change Management for the entire lifecycle
    • Larger in scope
    • May generate multiple change requests
    • Governed by PMO
    • Longer to build and test

    Info-Tech Insight

    While effort and cost are good indicators of changes and projects, consider evaluating risk and complexity too.

    1 Define what constitutes a change

    1. As a group, brainstorm examples of changes and projects. If you wish, you may choose to also separate out additional request types such as service requests (user), operational tasks (backend), and releases.
    2. Have each participant write the examples on sticky notes and populate the following chart on the whiteboard/flip chart.
    3. Use the examples to draw lines and determine what defines each category.
    • What makes a change distinct from a project?
    • What makes a change distinct from a service request?
    • What makes a change distinct from an operational task?
    • When do the category workflows cross over with other categories? (For example, when does a project interact with change management?
  • Record the definitions of requests and results in section 2.3 of the Change Management Standard Operating Procedure (SOP).
  • Change

    Project

    Service Request (Optional)

    Operational Task (Optional)

    Release (Optional)

    Changing Configuration

    New ERP

    Add new user

    Delete temp files

    Software release

    Download the Change Management Standard Operating Procedure (SOP).

    Input Output
    • List of examples of each category of the chart
    • Definitions for each category to be used at change intake
    Materials Participants
    • Whiteboard/flip charts (or shared screen if working remotely)
    • Service catalog (if applicable)
    • Sticky notes
    • Markers/pens
    • Change Management SOP
    • Change Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board

    2. Alignment at build and test

    Keep communications open by pre-defining and communicating project milestones.

    CAB touchpoints

    Consistently communicate the plan and timeline for hitting these milestones so CAB can prioritize and plan changes around it. This will give change control advanced notice of altered timelines.

    RFCs

    Projects may have multiple associated RFCs. Keeping CAB appraised of the project RFC or RFCs gives them the ability to further plan changes.

    Change Calendar

    Query and fill the change calendar with project timelines and milestones to compliment the CAB touchpoints.

    Leverage the RFC to record and communicate project details

    The request for change (RFC) form does not have to be a burden to fill out. If designed with value in mind, it can be leveraged to set standards on all changes (from projects and otherwise).

    When looking at the RFC during the Build and Test phase of a project, prioritize the following fields to ensure the implementation will be successful from a technical and user-adoption point of view.

    Filling these fields of the RFC and communicating them to the CAB at go-live approval gives the approvers confidence that the project will be implemented successfully and measures are known for when that implementation is not successful.

    Download the Request for Change Form Template

    Communication Plan

    The project may be successful from a technical point of view, but if users do not know about go-live or how to interact with the project, it will ultimately fail.

    Training Plan

    If necessary, think of how to train different stakeholders on the project go-live. This includes training for end users interacting with the project and technicians supporting the project.

    Implementation Plan

    Write the implementation plan at a high enough level that gives the CAB confidence that the implementation team knows the steps well.

    Rollback Plan

    Having a well-formulated rollback plan gives the CAB the confidence that the impact of the project is well known and the impact to the business is limited even if the implementation does not go well.

    Provide clear definitions of what goes on the change calendar and who’s responsible

    Inputs

    • Freeze periods for individual business departments/applications (e.g. finance month-end periods, HR payroll cycle, etc. – all to be investigated)
    • Maintenance windows and planned outage periods
    • Project schedules, and upcoming major/medium changes
    • Holidays
    • Business hours (some departments work 9-5, others work different hours or in different time zones, and user acceptance testing may require business users to be available)

    Guidelines

    • Business-defined freeze periods are the top priority.
    • No major or medium normal changes should occur during the week between Christmas and New Year’s Day.
    • Vendor SLA support hours are the preferred time for implementing changes.
    • The vacation calendar for IT will be considered for major changes.
    • Change priority: High > Medium > Low.
    • Minor changes and preapproved changes have the same priority and will be decided on a case-by-case basis.

    Roles

    • The Change Manager will be responsible for creating and maintaining a change calendar.
    • Only the Change Manager can physically alter the calendar by adding a new change after the CAB has agreed upon a deployment date.
    • All other CAB members, IT support staff, and other impacted stakeholders should have access to the calendar on a read-only basis to prevent people from making unauthorized changes to deployment dates.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Make the calendar visible to as many parties as necessary. However, limit the number of personnel who can make active changes to the calendar to limit calendar conflicts.

    3. Alignment at approval

    How can project management effectively contribute to CAB?

    As optional CAB members

    Project SMEs may attend when projects are ready to go live and when invited by the change manager. Optional members provide details on change cross-dependencies, high-level testing, rollback, communication plans, etc. to inform prioritization and scheduling decisions.

    As project management representatives

    Project management should also attend CAB meetings to report in on changes to ongoing projects, implementation timelines, and project milestones. Projects are typically high-priority changes when going live due to their impact. Advanced notice of timeline and milestone changes allow the rest of the CAB to properly manage other changes going into production.

    As core CAB members

    The core responsibilities of CAB must still be fulfilled:

    1. Protect the live environment from poorly assessed, tested, and implemented changes.

    2. Prioritize changes in a way that fairly reflects change impact, urgency, and likelihood.

    3. Schedule deployments in a way the minimizes conflict and disruption.

    If you need to define the authority and responsibilities of the CAB, see Activity 2.1.3 of the Optimize IT Change Management blueprint.

    4. Alignment at implementation

    At this stage, the project or project phase is treated as any other change.

    Verification

    Once the change has been implemented, verify that all requirements are fulfilled.

    Review

    Ensure all affected systems and applications are operating as predicted.

    Update change ticket and change log

    Update RFC status and CMDB as well (if necessary).

    Transition

    Once the change implementation is complete, it’s imperative that the team involved inform and train the operational and support groups.

    If you need to define transitioning changes to production, download Transition Projects to the Service Desk

    5. Alignment at post-implementation

    Tackle the most neglected portion of change management to avoid making the same mistake twice.

    1. Define RFC statuses that need a PIR
    2. Conduct PIRs for failed changes. Successful changes can simply be noted and transitioned to operations.

    3. Conduct a PIR for every failed change
    4. It’s best to perform a PIR once a change-related incident is resolved.

    5. Avoid making the same mistake twice
    6. Include a root-cause analysis, mitigation actions/timeline, and lessons learned in the documentation.

    7. Report to CAB
    8. Socialize the findings of the PIR at the subsequent CAB meeting.

    9. Circle back on previous PIRs
    10. If a similar change is conducted, append the related PIR to avoid the same mistakes.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Include your PIR documentation right in the RFC for easy reference.

    Download the RFC template for more details on post-implementation reviews

    2 Implement your alignments stepwise

    1. As a group, decide on which implementations you need to make to align change management and project management.
    2. For each improvement, list a timeline for implementation.
    3. Update section 3.5 in the Change Management Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). to outline the responsibilities of project management within IT Change Management.

    The image contains a screenshot of the Change Management SOP

    Download the Change Management Standard Operating Procedure (SOP).

    Input Output
    • This deck
    • SOP update
    Materials Participants
    • Whiteboard/flip charts (or shared screen if working remotely)
    • Service catalog (if applicable)
    • Sticky notes
    • Markers/pens
    • Change Management SOP
    • Change Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Optimize IT Change Management

    Right-size IT change management to protect the live environment.

    Optimize IT Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization

    Decide which IT projects to approve and when to start them.

    Maintain an Organized Portfolio

    Align portfolio management practices with COBIT (APO05: Manage Portfolio).

    Implement Lean Management Practices That Work

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}116|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Performance Measurement
    • Parent Category Link: /performance-measurement
    • Service delivery teams do not measure, or have difficulty demonstrating, the value they provide.
    • There is a lack of continuous improvement.
    • There is low morale within the IT teams leading to low productivity.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Create a problem-solving culture. Frequent problem solving is the differentiator between sustaining Lean or falling back to old management methods.
    • Commit to employee growth. Empower teams to problem solve and multiply your organizational effectiveness.

    Impact and Result

    • Apply Lean management principles to IT to create alignment and transparency and drive continuous improvement and customer value.
    • Implement huddles and visual management.
    • Build team capabilities.
    • Focus on customer value.
    • Use metrics and data to make better decisions.
    • Systematically solve problems and improve performance.
    • Develop an operating rhythm to promote adherence to Lean.

    Implement Lean Management Practices That Work Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out how a Lean management system can help you increase transparency, demonstrate value, engage your teams and customers, continuously improve, and create alignment.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Understand Lean concepts

    Understand what a Lean management system is, review Lean philosophies, and examine simple Lean tools and activities.

    • Implement Lean Management Practices That Work – Phase 1: Understand Lean Concepts
    • Lean Management Education Deck

    2. Determine the scope of your implementation

    Understand the implications of the scope of your Lean management program.

    • Implement Lean Management Practices That Work – Phase 2: Determine the Scope of Your Implementation
    • Lean Management Scoping Tool

    3. Design huddle board

    Examine the sections and content to include in your huddle board design.

    • Implement Lean Management Practices That Work – Phase 3: Design Huddle Board
    • Lean Management Huddle Board Template

    4. Design Leader Standard Work and operating rhythm

    Determine the actions required by leaders and the operating rhythm.

    • Implement Lean Management Practices That Work – Phase 4: Design Leader Standard Work and Operating Rhythm
    • Leader Standard Work Tracking Template
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Implement Lean Management Practices That Work

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Understand Lean Concepts

    The Purpose

    Understand Lean management.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Gain a common understanding of Lean management, the Lean management thought model, Lean philosophies, huddles, visual management, team growth, and voice of customer.

    Activities

    1.1 Define Lean management in your organization.

    1.2 Create training materials.

    Outputs

    Lean management definition

    Customized training materials

    2 Understand Lean Concepts (Continued) and Determine Scope

    The Purpose

    Understand Lean management.

    Determine the scope of your program.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understand metrics and performance review.

    Understand problem identification and continuous improvement.

    Understand Kanban.

    Understand Leader Standard Work.

    Define the scope of the Lean management program.

    Activities

    2.1 Develop example operational metrics

    2.2 Simulate problem section.

    2.3 Simulate Kanban.

    2.4 Build scoping tool.

    Outputs

    Understand how to use operational metrics

    Understand problem identification

    Understand Kanban/daily tasks section

    Defined scope for your program

    3 Huddle Board Design and Huddle Facilitation Coaching

    The Purpose

    Design the sections and content for your huddle board.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Initial huddle board design.

    Activities

    3.1 Design and build each section in your huddle board.

    3.2 Simulate coaching conversations.

    Outputs

    Initial huddle board design

    Understanding of how to conduct a huddle

    4 Design and Build Leader Standard Work

    The Purpose

    Design your Leader Standard Work activities.

    Develop a schedule for executing Leader Standard Work.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Standard activities identified and documented.

    Sample schedule developed.

    Activities

    4.1 Identify standard activities for leaders.

    4.2 Develop a schedule for executing Leader Standard Work.

    Outputs

    Leader Standard Work activities documented

    Initial schedule for Leader Standard Work activities

    Understand the Data and Analytics Landscape

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}131|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.8/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $2,000 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 14 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Data Management
    • Parent Category Link: /data-management
    • The data and analytics landscape comprises many disciplines and components; organizations may find themselves unsure of where to start or what data topic or area they should be addressing.
    • Organizations want to better understand the components of the data and analytics landscape and how they are connected.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • This deck will provide a base understanding of the core data disciplines and will point to the various Info-Tech blueprints that dive deeper into each of the areas.

    Impact and Result

    • This deck will provide a base understanding of the core disciplines of the data and analytics landscape and will point to the various Info-Tech blueprints that dive deeper into each of the areas.

    Understand the Data and Analytics Landscape Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Understand the data and analytics landscape

    Get an overview of the core disciplines of the data and analytics landscape.

    • Understand the Data and Analytics Landscape Storyboard

    Infographic

    Get Started With FinOps

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}473|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Cloud Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /cloud-strategy
    • Runaway cloud costs are wrecking the CIO’s budget, but cloud costs are hard to reign in because vendors are not always up front about the true costs, it’s easy to oversubscribe to services and quickly run up costs with pay-as-you-go service, and cloud bills are complex.
    • While IT isn’t the business owner for cloud services, they often carry the cost of overruns on their budget, and don’t have the skills or influence to more effectively manage cloud costs.
    • Truly optimizing cloud spend and maximizing business value from cloud requires insight and collaboration from IT/engineering, finance, and business owners, but those teams are often siloed and manage their cloud usage or spend differently.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • The business units that need to collaborate to make FinOps work are often siloed, with different processes, data, metrics and cloud expertise. Coordinating their efforts to encourage shared responsibility can be a big obstacle to overcome.
    • FinOps requires a cultural shift to empower every cloud user to take accountability for cloud cost optimization.
    • To get started with FinOps, it’s essential to first break down those silos and get the multiple teams involved on the same page. Everyone must understand how FinOps is part of their responsibilities.

    Impact and Result

    • Implementing FinOps will lead to improved visibility and control over cloud spend, optimized resource allocation and reduced cloud waste, enhanced transparency, improved forecasting and budgeting, and increased accountability over cloud costs across business units.
    • This blueprint will help you get started with FinOps by identifying the roles involved in FinOps, defining the key activities that must be conducted, and assigning ownership to each task. This will help foster a shared responsibility for FinOps and encourage everyone to work toward common goals.

    Get Started With FinOps Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Get Started With FinOps Deck – A guide to defining and assigning the roles and activities involved in FinOps.

    This storyboard will help you define FinOps roles and structure of the FinOps and other teams, identify key activities, and assign ownership to each. It will also provide guidance on analyzing the results of the RACI chart.

    • Get Started With FinOps Storyboard

    2. FinOps RACI Chart – A tool to help you assess the current state of FinOps activities and assign ownership to each.

    This tool will help you assess the current state of FinOps activities and assign ownership to each activity. Use the outputs of the exercise to define how roles across the organization will be involved in FinOps and where to focus efforts in maturing in FinOps.

    • FinOps RACI Chart
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Get Started With FinOps

    FinOps goes beyond identifying cloud savings. It empowers every cloud user to maximize the value of their spend.

    Executive Brief

    Analyst Perspective

    The first step of FinOps is collectively realizing that maximizing value is every cloud user's responsibility.

    Natalie Sansone

    Natalie Sansone, PhD
    Research Director, Infrastructure & Operations
    Info-Tech Research Group

    As cloud adoption increases, and with it the complexity of cloud environments, managing and optimizing cloud spend has become both a top challenge and priority for IT organizations. In response, the practice of FinOps has emerged to help organizations maximize the value they get from the cloud. As its popularity surges, organizations are told they must do FinOps, but many feel their practice is not yet mature. One of their biggest obstacles is empowering engineers and other cloud users to work toward this shared goal with other teams.

    To grow and mature your FinOps practice, your first challenge is breaking down silos, encouraging collaboration across varying business units, and getting all cloud users to be accountable for their cloud usage and spend and to understand the shared goals of FinOps. Beyond finding ways to reduce cloud costs, FinOps is a cultural shift that enables better collaboration between distributed teams. It allows them to leverage data to identify opportunities to maximize business value from cloud investments.

    Whether you’re starting the FinOps journey or looking to mature your practice, this blueprint will help you organize by defining the required role and tasks. Then you can work through a collective exercise to ensure everyone understands who is involved and responsible for each activity. You’ll gain the information you need and be better positioned to continuously improve and mature your processes, but success begins with everyone understanding that FinOps is a shared responsibility.

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    Common Obstacles

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    • Runaway cloud costs are wrecking the CIO’s budget, but these are hard to rein in because cloud vendors are not always upfront about the true costs. It’s easy to oversubscribe to services and quickly run up costs with pay-as-you-go service and complex bills.
    • While IT isn’t the business owner for cloud services, they often carry the cost of overruns on their budget, and don’t have the skills or influence to more effectively manage cloud costs.
    • Truly optimizing cloud spend and maximizing its business value requires insight and collaboration from IT/engineering, finance, and business owners, but those teams are often siloed and manage their cloud usage/spend differently.
    • IT leaders are instructed to implement a FinOps practice, but don’t truly understand what that is, who needs to be involved, or where to start.
    • Business units that must collaborate to make FinOps work are often siloed and have different processes, data, metrics, and cloud expertise. Coordinating efforts to encourage shared responsibility can be a challenge. FinOps requires a cultural shift to empower every cloud user to take accountability for cost optimization.
    • Lack of visibility into cloud usage, spending patterns, and cost drivers along with inadequate tools to get the required data to drive decision making. This leads to hindered progress.
    • Implementing FinOps will improve visibility and control over cloud spend, optimize resource allocation and reduce waste, enhance transparency, improve forecasting and budgeting, and improve cost accountability across business units.
    • To get started with FinOps, first it’s essential to break down those silos and coordinate the multiple teams involved. Everyone must understand how FinOps is part of their responsibilities.
    • This blueprint will help you identify the roles involved in FinOps, define the key activities that must be conducted, and assign ownership to each task. This will help foster a shared responsibility for FinOps and encourage everyone to work toward common goals.

    Info-Tech Insight

    FinOps is not just about driving cloud savings. It’s a cultural shift empowering every cloud user to maximize the value of their spend. The first step of FinOps is therefore to help everyone understand their share of responsibility.

    What is FinOps?

    Definition

    “FinOps is an evolving cloud financial management discipline and cultural practice that enables organizations to get maximum business value by helping engineering, finance, technology, and business teams to collaborate on data-driven spending decisions.”

    Definition Updated: November 2021 by the FinOps Foundation Technical Advisory Council

    The ultimate purpose of FinOps is to bring business value to your organization by reducing cloud waste.

    • FinOps is the people, processes, and tools you use to eliminate waste and ensure you get the most value from your cloud spend.
    • FinOps is the framework within which teams can operate to ensure they are optimizing their use of cloud resources.
    • FinOps brings financial accountability to cloud spend.
    • FinOps is a culture practice where everyone collaborates and takes ownership for their cloud usage while being supported and governed by a central group. It breaks down silos so teams that haven’t worked closely together in the past collaborate toward shared goals.
    • It brings financial accountability and cultural change to cloud spend by enabling distributed teams to better collaborate and leverage data to decide where/when to invest in cloud for maximum business value.
    • FinOps is not done by an individual or just one team. It’s a change in the way that many disparate teams work together, from engineering to finance to business teams.

    Common misconceptions about FinOps

    FinOps is not

    FinOps is

    • Only about saving money
    • Only focused on activities related to cost optimization
    • IT financial management, which involves tracking and analyzing all costs associated with IT services
    • An activity (or set of activities) done by one person or team
    • Short for financial operations
    • About maximizing value. FinOps is optimizing cloud costs to provide maximum business value and support scalability (sometimes this means investing more money in cloud)
    • FinOps also involves building a culture of accountability, visibility, and collaboration around cloud usage and cost
    • Focused specifically on managing/optimizing cloud costs
    • A cultural shift around how disparate teams work together, people from all areas of the organization can play a role
    • The term is a portmanteau (combination) of Finance and (Dev)Ops, emphasizing the collaboration between business and engineering teams1
    1 “What is FinOps?” FinOps Foundation, 2023

    FinOps’ popularity has exploded in recent years

    2012 - The practice of FinOps begins to emerge through early scalers in public cloud like Adobe and Intuit

    2017 - Many IT departments begin to use the cloud for limited use cases, but very few enterprises are all in the cloud

    2019 - Many companies begin moving to a cloud-first strategy, shifting IT spend from capital to operational expenditure (CapEx to OpEx), complicating cloud bills

    February 2019 - The FinOps Foundation is born out of Cloudability’s Customer Advisory Board meeting where many cloud practitioners discuss the need for a community of practitioners

    June 2020 - The FinOps Foundation merges with Linux Foundation and sets the standard for cloud financial management

    Sources: Carr, 2022; Linux Foundation, 2023, Storment & Fuller, 2023.

    The image contains a graph that demonstrates the increasing number of people listing FinOps as a skill.

    Where did the term come from?

    The term FinOps has risen in popularity over the last few years. Originally, organizations used the term cloud cost management, then cloud cost optimization, then more broadly, cloud financial management. The latter has now been largely replaced by FinOps.

    Why is FinOps so essential? (1/2)

    The shift from fixed to variable spend has changed the way organizations must manage and report on costs.

    In the traditional data center era:

    • The enterprise procured infrastructure through large capital refreshes of data center hardware.
    • Infrastructure teams tried their best to avoid running out of storage before the next hardware refresh. Equipment was intentionally oversized to accommodate unexpected growth.
    • IT teams would not worry about how much infrastructure resources they consumed, provided they stayed within planned capacity limits. If capacity ran low, resource usage would be adjusted.
    • The business might not like laying out large capital expenditures, but it had full visibility into the cost and got to approve spending in advance using financial controls.
    • Monthly costs were well-understood and monthly or infrequent reporting was acceptable because day-to-day costs did not vary.
    • Mature organizations might chargeback or showback costs to application teams based on number of virtual machines or other measures, but traditional on-premises chargeback wouldn't save money overall.

    Why is FinOps so essential? (2/2)

    The shift from fixed to variable spend has changed the way organizations must manage and report on costs.

    In the cloud era:

    • Infrastructure resources must no longer be provisioned in advance through spending capital budgets.
    • Capacity management isn’t a major concern. Spare capacity is always available, and savings can result from not paying for unnecessary capacity.
    • Cloud services often offer pay-as-you-go pricing models, allowing more control and flexibility to pay only for the resources you consume.
    • When services use more resources than they need, running costs increase. Cost reductions are realized through reducing the size of allocated resources.
    • The variable consumption model can reduce operating costs but can make budgeting and forecasting difficult. IT and the business can no longer predict what they will pay for infrastructure resources.
    • Billing is no longer straightforward and monthly. Resources are individually charged in micro amounts. Costs must be regularly reviewed as unexpected or forgotten resource usage can add up significantly.

    Managing cloud spend remains a challenge for many organizations

    Given the variable nature of cloud costs and complex pricing structures, it can be easy to overspend without mature FinOps processes in place. Indeed, 82% of organizations cite managing cloud spend as one of their top challenges.

    Respondents reported that public cloud spend was over budget by an average of 18%, up from 13% the previous year.

    Source: Flexera 2023 State of the Cloud Report, n=750

    Organization's top cloud challenges.

    While FinOps adoption has rapidly increased, maturity has not

    Most organizations understand the value of FinOps but are not mature in their practice.

    NetApp’s 2023 State of CloudOps Report found that:

    96% say FinOps is important to their cloud strategy

    9% have a mature FinOps practice

    92% report that they struggle with FinOps

    Source: NetApp, 2023 State of CloudOps Report, n=310 IT decision makers in the United States responsible for public cloud infrastructure investments.

    Flexera’s 2023 State of the Cloud report found that 72% of organizations have a dedicated FinOps team.

    Flexera’s annual report also found that year over year, cloud cost responsibilities are increasingly shifting away from Finance/Accounting and Vendor Management teams and over to FinOps teams as they emerge and mature.

    Source: Flexera, 2023 State of the Cloud Report, n=750 decision-makers and users around the world

    Application Maintenance

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}30|cart{/j2store}
    • Related Products: {j2store}30|crosssells{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 10.0/10
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Applications
    • Parent Category Link: /applications

    The challenge

    • If you work with application maintenance or operations teams that handle the "run" of your applications, you may find that the sheer volume and variety of requests create large backlogs.
    • Your business and product owners may want scrum or DevOps teams to work on new functionality rather than spend effort on lifecycle management.
    • Increasing complexity and increasing reliance on technology may create unrealistic expectations for your maintenance teams. Business applications must be available around the clock, and new feature roadmaps cannot be side-tracked by maintenance.

    Our advice

    Insight

    • Improving maintenance focus may mean doing less work but create more value. Your teams need to be realistic about what commitments they take—balance maintenance with business value and risk levels.
    • Treat maintenance the same as any other development practice. Use the same intake and prioritization practices. Uphold the same quality standards.

    Impact and results 

    • Justify the necessity of streamlined and regular maintenance. Understand each stakeholder's objectives and concerns, validate them against your staff's current state, processes, and technologies involved.
    • Maintenance and risk go hand in hand. And the business wants to move forward all the time as well. Strengthen your prioritization practice. Use a holistic view of the business and technical impacts, risks, urgencies across the maintenance needs and requests. That allows you to justify their respective positions in the overall development backlog. Identify opportunities to bring some requirements and features together.
    • Build a repeatable process with appropriate governance around it. Ensure that people know their roles and responsibilities and are held accountable.
    • Instill development best-practices into your maintenance processes.

    The roadmap

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    Get started.

    Read our executive brief to understand everyday struggles regarding application maintenance, the root causes, and our methodology to overcome these. We show you how we can support you.

    Understand your maintenance priorities

    Identify your stakeholders and understand their drivers.

    • Streamline Application Maintenance – Phase 1: Assess the Current Maintenance Landscape (ppt)
    • Application Maintenance Operating Model Template (doc)
    • Application Maintenance Resource Capacity Assessment (xls)
    • Application Maintenance Maturity Assessment (xls)

    Define and employ maintenance governance

    Identify the right level of governance appropriate to your company and business context for your application maintenance. That ensures that people uphold standards across maintenance practices.

    • Streamline Application Maintenance – Phase 2: Develop a Maintenance Release Schedule (ppt)

    Enhance your prioritization practices

    Most companies cannot do everything for all applications and systems. Build your maintenance triage and prioritization rules to safeguard your company, maximize business value generation and IT risks and requirements.

    • Streamline Application Maintenance – Phase 3: Optimize Maintenance Capabilities (ppt)

    Streamline your maintenance delivery

    Define quality standards in maintenance practices. Enforce these in alignment with the governance you have set up. Show a high degree of transparency and open discussions on development challenges.

    • Streamline Application Maintenance – Phase 4: Streamline Maintenance Delivery (ppt)
    • Application Maintenance Business Case Presentation Document (ppt)

     

     

    Satisfy Digital End Users With Low- and No-Code

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}185|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 8.5/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $2,460 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 2 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Architecture & Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /architecture-and-strategy
    • Your organization decided to invest in digital solutions to support their transition to a digital and automated workplace. They are ready to begin the planning and delivery of these solutions.
    • However, IT capacity is constrained due to the high and aggressive demand to meet business priorities and maintain mission critical applications. Technical experience and skills are difficult to find, and stakeholders are increasing their expectations to deliver technologies faster with high quality using less resources.
    • Stakeholders are interested in low and no code solutions as ways to their software delivery challenges and explore new digital capabilities.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Current software delivery inefficiencies and lack of proper governance and standards impedes the ability to successfully scale and mature low and no code investments and see their full value.
    • Many operating models and culture do not enable or encourage the collaboration needed to evaluate business opportunities and underlying operational systems.This can exacerbate existing shadow IT challenges and promote a negative perception of IT.
    • Low and no code tools bring significant organizational, process, and technical changes that IT and the business may not be prepared or willing to accept and adopt, especially when these tools support business and worker managed applications and services.

    Impact and Result

    • Establish the right expectations. Profile your digital end users and their needs and challenges. Discuss current IT and business software delivery and digital product priorities to determine what to expect from low- and no-code.
    • Build your low- and no-code governance and support. Clarify the roles, processes, and tools needed for low- and no-code delivery and management through IT and business collaboration.
    • Evaluate the fit of low- and no-code and shortlist possible tools. Obtain a thorough view of the business and technical complexities of your use cases. Indicate where and how low- and no-code is expected to generate the most return.

    Satisfy Digital End Users With Low- and No-Code Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Satisfy Digital End Users With Low- and No-Code Deck – A step-by-step guide on selecting the appropriate low- and no-code tools and building the right people, processes, and technologies to support them.

    This blueprint helps you develop an approach to understand your low- and no-code challenges and priorities and to shortlist, govern, and manage the right low- and no-code tools.

    • Satisfy Digital End Users With Low- and No-Code – Phases 1-3

    2. Low- and No-Code Communication Template – Clearly communicate the goal and approach of your low- and no-code implementation in a language your audience understands.

    This template narrates a story to describe the need and expectations of your low- and no-code initiative to get buy-in from stakeholders and interested parties.

    • Low- and No-Code Communication Template

    Infographic

    Workshop: Satisfy Digital End Users With Low- and No-Code

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Select Your Tools

    The Purpose

    Understand the personas of your low- and no-code users and their needs.

    List the challenges low- and no-code is designed to solve or the opportunities you hope to exploit.

    Identify the low- and no-code tools to address your needs.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Level set expectations on what low- and no-code can deliver.

    Identify areas where low- and no-code can be the most beneficial.

    Select the tools to best address your problem and opportunities.

    Activities

    1.1 Profile your digital end users

    1.2 Set reasonable expectations

    1.3 List your use cases

    1.4 Shortlist your tools

    Outputs

    Digital end-user skills assessment

    Low- and no-code objectives and metrics

    Low- and no-code use case opportunities

    Low- and no-code tooling shortlist

    2 Deliver Your Solution

    The Purpose

    Optimize your product delivery process to accommodate low- and no-code.

    Review and improve your product delivery and management governance model.

    Discuss how to improve your low- and no-code capacities.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Encourage business-IT collaborative practices and improve IT’s reputation.

    Shift the right accountability and ownership to the business.

    Equip digital end users with the right skills and competencies.

    Activities

    2.1 Adapt your delivery process

    2.2 Transform your governance

    2.3 Identify your low- and no-code capacities

    Outputs

    Low- and no-code delivery process and guiding principles

    Low- and no-code governance, including roles and responsibilities, product ownership and guardrails

    List of low- and no-code capacity improvements

    3 Plan Your Adoption

    The Purpose

    Design a CoE and/or CoP to support low- and no-code capabilities.

    Build a roadmap to illustrate key low- and no-code initiatives.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Ensure coordinated, architected, and planned implementation and adoption of low- and no-code consistently across the organization.

    Reaffirm support for digital end users new to low- and no-code.

    Clearly communicate your approach to low- and no-code.

    Activities

    3.1 Support digital end users and facilitate cross-functional sharing

    3.2 Yield results with a roadmap

    Outputs

    Low- and no-code supportive body design (e.g. center of excellence, community of practice)

    Low- and no-code roadmap

    Develop and Deploy Security Policies

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}256|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.5/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $19,953 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 19 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Governance, Risk & Compliance
    • Parent Category Link: /governance-risk-compliance
    • Employees are not paying attention to policies. Awareness and understanding of what the security policy’s purpose is, how it benefits the organization, and the importance of compliance are overlooked when policies are distributed.
    • Informal, un-rationalized, ad hoc policies do not explicitly outline responsibilities, are rarely comprehensive, and are difficult to implement, revise, and maintain.
    • Data breaches are still on the rise and security policies are not shaping good employee behavior or security-conscious practices.
    • Adhering to security policies is rarely a priority to users as compliance often feels like an interference to daily workflow. For a lot of organizations, security policies are not having the desired effect.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Creating good policies is only half the solution. Having a great policy management lifecycle will keep your policies current, effective, and compliant.
    • Policies must be reasonable, auditable, enforceable, and measurable. If the policy items don’t meet these requirements, users can’t be expected to adhere to them. Focus on developing policies to be quantified and qualified for them to be relevant.

    Impact and Result

    • Save time and money using the templates provided to create your own customized security policies mapped to the Info-Tech framework, which incorporates multiple industry best-practice frameworks (NIST, ISO, SOC2SEC, CIS, PCI, HIPAA).

    Develop and Deploy Security Policies Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Develop and Deploy Security Policies Deck – A step-by-step guide to help you build, implement, and assess your security policy program.

    Our systematic approach will ensure that all identified areas of security have an associated policy.

  • Develop the security policy program.
  • Develop and implement the policy suite.
  • Communicate the security policy program.
  • Measure the security policy program.
    • Develop and Deploy Security Policies – Phases 1-4

    2. Security Policy Prioritization Tool – A structured tool to help your organization prioritize your policy suite to ensure that you are addressing the most important policies first.

    The Security Policy Prioritization Tool assesses the policy suite on policy importance, ease to implement, and ease to enforce. The output of this tool is your prioritized list of policies based on our policy framework.

    • Security Policy Prioritization Tool

    3. Security Policy Assessment Tool – A structured tool to assess the effectiveness of policies within your organization and determine recommended actions for remediation.

    The Security Policy Assessment Tool assesses the policy suite on policy coverage, communication, adherence, alignment, and overlap. The output of this tool is a checklist of remediation actions for each individual policy.

    • Security Policy Assessment Tool

    4. Security Policy Lifecycle Template – A customizable lifecycle template to manage your security policy initiatives.

    The Lifecycle Template includes sections on security vision, security mission, strategic security and policy objectives, policy design, roles and responsibilities for developing security policies, and organizational responsibilities.

    • Security Policy Lifecycle Template

    5. Policy Suite Templates – A best-of-breed templates suite mapped to the Info-Tech framework you can customize to reflect your organizational requirements and acquire approval.

    Use Info-Tech's security policy templates, which incorporate multiple industry best-practice frameworks (NIST, ISO, SOC2SEC, CIS, PCI, HIPAA), to ensure that your policies are clear, concise, and consistent.

    • Acceptable Use of Technology Policy Template
    • Application Security Policy Template
    • Asset Management Policy Template
    • Backup and Recovery Policy Template
    • Cloud Security Policy Template
    • Compliance and Audit Management Policy Template
    • Data Security Policy Template
    • Endpoint Security Policy Template
    • Human Resource Security Policy Template
    • Identity and Access Management Policy Template
    • Information Security Policy Template
    • Network and Communications Security Policy Template
    • Physical and Environmental Security Policy Template
    • Security Awareness and Training Policy Template
    • Security Incident Management Policy Template
    • Security Risk Management Policy Template
    • Security Threat Detection Policy Template
    • System Configuration and Change Management Policy Template
    • Vulnerability Management Policy Template

    6. Policy Communication Plan Template – A template to help you plan your approach for publishing and communicating your policy updates across the entire organization.

    This template helps you consider the budget time for communications, identify all stakeholders, and avoid scheduling communications in competition with one another.

    • Policy Communication Plan Template

    7. Security Awareness and Training Program Development Tool – A tool to help you identify initiatives to develop your security awareness and training program.

    Use this tool to first identify the initiatives that can grow your program, then as a roadmap tool for tracking progress of completion for those initiatives.

    • Security Awareness and Training Program Development Tool

    Infographic

    Workshop: Develop and Deploy Security Policies

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Define the Security Policy Program

    The Purpose

    Define the security policy development program.

    Formalize a governing security policy lifecycle.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understanding the current state of policies within your organization.

    Prioritizing list of security policies for your organization.

    Being able to defend policies written based on business requirements and overarching security needs.

    Leveraging an executive champion to help policy adoption across the organization.

    Formalizing the roles, responsibilities, and overall mission of the program.

    Activities

    1.1 Understand the current state of policies.

    1.2 Align your security policies to the Info-Tech framework for compliance.

    1.3 Understand the relationship between policies and other documents.

    1.4 Prioritize the development of security policies.

    1.5 Discuss strategies to leverage stakeholder support.

    1.6 Plan to communicate with all stakeholders.

    1.7 Develop the security policy lifecycle.

    Outputs

    Security Policy Prioritization Tool

    Security Policy Prioritization Tool

    Security Policy Lifecycle Template

    2 Develop the Security Policy Suite

    The Purpose

    Develop a comprehensive suite of security policies that are relevant to the needs of the organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Time, effort, and money saved by developing formally documented security policies with input from Info-Tech’s subject-matter experts.

    Activities

    2.1 Discuss the risks and drivers your organization faces that must be addressed by policies.

    2.2 Develop and customize security policies.

    2.3 Develop a plan to gather feedback from users.

    2.4 Discuss a plan to submit policies for approval.

    Outputs

    Understanding of the risks and drivers that will influence policy development.

    Up to 14 customized security policies (dependent on need and time).

    3 Implement Security Policy Program

    The Purpose

    Ensure policies and requirements are communicated with end users, along with steps to comply with the new security policies.

    Improve compliance and accountability with security policies.

    Plan for regular review and maintenance of the security policy program.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Streamlined communication of the policies to users.

    Improved end user compliance with policy guidelines and be better prepared for audits.

    Incorporate security policies into daily schedule, eliminating disturbances to productivity and efficiency.

    Activities

    3.1 Plan the communication strategy of new policies.

    3.2 Discuss myPolicies to automate management and implementation.

    3.3 Incorporate policies and processes into your security awareness and training program.

    3.4 Assess the effectiveness of security policies.

    3.5 Understand the need for regular review and update.

    Outputs

    Policy Communication Plan Template

    Understanding of how myPolicies can help policy management and implementation.

    Security Awareness and Training Program Development Tool

    Security Policy Assessment Tool

    Action plan to regularly review and update the policies.

    Further reading

    Develop and Deploy Security Policies

    Enhance your overall security posture with a defensible and prescriptive policy suite.

    Analyst Perspective

    A policy lifecycle can be the secret sauce to managing your policies.

    A policy for policy’s sake is useless if it isn’t being used to ensure proper processes are followed. A policy should exist for more than just checking a requirement box. Policies need to be quantified, qualified, and enforced for them to be relevant.

    Policies should be developed based on the use cases that enable the business to run securely and smoothly. Ensure they are aligned with the corporate culture. Rather than introducing hindrances to daily operations, policies should reflect security practices that support business goals and protection.

    No published framework is going to be a perfect fit for any organization, so take the time to compare business operations and culture with security requirements to determine which ones apply to keep your organization secure.

    Photo of Danny Hammond, Research Analyst, Security, Risk, Privacy & Compliance Practice, Info-Tech Research Group. Danny Hammond
    Research Analyst
    Security, Risk, Privacy & Compliance Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge
    • Security breaches are damaging and costly. Trying to prevent and respond to them without robust, enforceable policies makes a difficult situation even harder to handle.
    • Informal, un-rationalized, ad hoc policies are ineffective because they do not explicitly outline responsibilities and compliance requirements, and they are rarely comprehensive.
    • Without a strong lifecycle to keep policies up to date and easy to use, end users will ignore or work around poorly understood policies.
    • Time and money is wasted dealing with preventable security issues that should be pre-emptively addressed in a comprehensive corporate security policy program.
    Common Obstacles

    InfoSec leaders will struggle to craft the right set of policies without knowing what the organization actually needs, such as:

    • The security policies needed to safeguard infrastructure and resources.
    • The scope the security policies will cover within the organization.
    • The current compliance and regulatory obligations based on location and industry.
    InfoSec leaders must understand the business environment and end-user needs before they can select security policies that fit.
    Info-Tech’s Approach

    Info-Tech’s Develop and Deploy Security Policies takes a multi-faceted approach to the problem that incorporates foundational technical elements, compliance considerations, and supporting processes:

    • Assess what security policies currently exist within the organization and consider additional secure policies.
    • Develop a policy lifecycle that will define the needs, develop required documentation, and implement, communicate, and measure your policy program.
    • Draft a set of security policies mapped to the Info-Tech framework, which incorporates multiple industry best-practice frameworks (NIST, ISO, SOC2SEC, CIS, PCI, HIPAA).

    Info-Tech Insight

    Creating good policies is only half the solution. Having a great policy management lifecycle will keep your policies current, effective, and compliant.

    Your Challenge

    This research is designed to help organizations design a program to develop and deploy security policies

    • A security policy is a formal document that outlines the required behavior and security controls in place to protect corporate assets.
    • The development of policy documents is an ambitious task, but the real challenge comes with communication and enforcement.
    • A good security policy allows employees to know what is required of them and allows management to monitor and audit security practices against a standard policy.
    • Unless the policies are effectively communicated, enforced, and updated, employees won’t know what’s required of them and will not comply with essential standards, making the policies powerless.
    • Without a good policy lifecycle in place, it can be challenging to illustrate the key steps and decisions involved in creating and managing a policy.

    The problem with security policies

    29% Of IT workers say it's just too hard and time consuming to track and enforce.

    25% Of IT workers say they don’t enforce security policies universally.

    20% Of workers don’t follow company security policies all the time.

    (Source: Security Magazine, 2020)

    Common obstacles

    The problem with security policies isn’t development; rather, it’s the communication, enforcement, and maintenance of them.

    • Employees are not paying attention to policies. Awareness and understanding of what the security policy’s purpose is, how it benefits the organization, and the importance of compliance are overlooked when policies are distributed.
    • Informal, un-rationalized, ad hoc policies do not explicitly outline responsibilities, are rarely comprehensive, and are difficult to implement, revise, and maintain.
    • Date breaches are still on the rise and security policies are not shaping good employee behavior or security-conscious practices.
    • Adhering to security policies is rarely a priority to users as compliance often feels like an interference to daily workflow. For a lot of organizations, security policies are not having the desired effect.
    Bar chart of the 'Average cost of a data breach' in years '2019-20', '20-21', and '21-22'.
    (Source: IBM, 2022 Cost of a Data Breach; n=537)

    Reaching an all-time high, the cost of a data breach averaged US$4.35 million in 2022. This figure represents a 2.6% increase from last year, when the average cost of a breach was US$4.24 million. The average cost has climbed 12.7% since 2020.

    Info-Tech’s approach

    The right policy for the right audience. Generate a roadmap to guide the order of policy development based on organizational policy requirements and the target audience.

    Actions

    1. Develop policy lifecycle
    2. Identify compliance requirements
    3. Understand which policies need to be developed, maintained, or decommissioned
    I. Define Security Policy Program

    a) Security policy program lifecycle template

    b) Policy prioritization tool
    Clockwise cycle arrows at the centre of the table. II. Develop & Implement Policy Suite

    a) Policy template set

    Policies must be reasonable, auditable, enforceable, and measurable. Policy items that meet these requirements will have a higher level of adherence. Focus on efficiently creating policies using pre-developed templates that are mapped to multiple compliance frameworks.

    Actions

    1. Differentiate between policies, procedures, standards, and guidelines
    2. Draft policies from templates
    3. Review policies, including completeness
    4. Approve policies
    Gaining feedback on policy compliance is important for updates and adaptation, where necessary, as well as monitoring policy alignment to business objectives.

    Actions

    1. Enforce policies
    2. Measure policy effectiveness
    IV. Measure Policy Program

    a) Security policy tracking tool

    III. Communicate Policy Program

    a) Security policy awareness & training tool

    b) Policy communication plan template
    Awareness and training on security policies should be targeted and must be relevant to the employees’ jobs. Employees will be more attentive and willing to incorporate what they learn if they feel that awareness and training material was specifically designed to help them.

    Actions

    1. Identify any changes in the regulatory and compliance environment
    2. Include policy awareness in awareness and training programs
    3. Disseminate policies
    Build trust in your policy program by involving stakeholder participation through the entire policy lifecycle.

    Blueprint benefits

    IT/InfoSec Benefits

    • Reduces complexity within the policy creation process by using a single framework to align multiple compliance regimes.
    • Introduces a roadmap to clearly educate employees on the do’s and don’ts of IT usage within the organization.
    • Reduces costs and efforts related to managing IT security and other IT-related threats.

    Business Benefits

    • Identifies and develops security policies that are essential to your organization’s objectives.
    • Integrates security into corporate culture while maximizing compliance and effectiveness of security policies.
    • Reduces security policy compliance risk.

    Key deliverable:

    Security Policy Templates

    Templates for policies that can be used to map policy statements to multiple compliance frameworks.

    Sample of Security Policy Templates.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    Security Policy Prioritization Tool

    The Info-Tech Security Policy Prioritization Tool will help you determine which security policies to work on first.
    Sample of the Security Policy Prioritization Tool.
    Sample of the Security Policy Assessment Tool.

    Security Policy Assessment Tool

    Info-Tech's Security Policy Assessment Tool helps ensure that your policies provide adequate coverage for your organization's security requirements.

    Measure the value of this blueprint

    Phase

    Purpose

    Measured Value

    Define Security Policy Program Understand the value in formal security policies and determine which policies to prepare to update, eliminate, or add to your current suite. Time, value, and resources saved with guidance and templates:
    1 FTE*3 days*$80,000/year = $1,152
    Time, value, and resources saved using our recommendations and tools:
    1 FTE*2 days*$80,000/year = $768
    Develop and Implement the Policy Suite Select from an extensive policy template offering and customize the policies you need to optimize or add to your own policy program. Time, value, and resources saved using our templates:
    1 consultant*15 days*$150/hour = $21,600 (if starting from scratch)
    Communicate Security Policy Program Use Info-Tech’s methodology and best practices to ensure proper communication, training, and awareness. Time, value, and resources saved using our training and awareness resources:
    1 FTE*1.5 days*$80,000/year = $408
    Measure Security Policy Program Use Info-Tech’s custom toolkits for continuous tracking and review of your policy suite. Time, value, and resources saved by using our enforcement recommendations:
    2 FTEs*5 days*$160,000/year combined = $3,840
    Time, value, and resources saved by using our recommendations rather than an external consultant:
    1 consultant*5 days*$150/hour = $7,200

    After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve.

    Overall Impact

    9.5 /10

    Overall Average $ Saved

    $29,015

    Overall Average Days Saved

    25

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Guided Implementation

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is six to ten calls over the course of two to four months.

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    Phase 3

    Phase 4

    Call #1: Scope security policy requirements, objectives, and any specific challenges.

    Call #2: Review policy lifecycle; prioritize policy development.

    Call #3: Customize the policy templates.

    Call #4: Gather feedback on policies and get approval.

    Call #5: Communicate the security policy program.

    Call #6: Develop policy training and awareness programs.

    Call #7: Track policies and exceptions.

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889
    Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
    Define the security policy program
    Develop the security policy suite
    Develop the security policy suite
    Implement security policy program
    Finalize deliverables and next steps
    Activities

    1.1 Understand the current state of policies.

    1.2 Align your security policies to the Info-Tech framework for compliance.

    1.3 Understand the relationship between policies and other documents.

    1.4 Prioritize the development of security policies.

    1.5 Discuss strategies to leverage stakeholder support.

    1.6 Plan to communicate with all stakeholders.

    1.7 Develop the security policy lifecycle.

    2.1 Discuss the risks and drivers your organization faces that must be addressed by policies.

    2.2 Develop and customize security policies.

    2.1 Discuss the risks and drivers your organization faces that must be addressed by policies (continued).

    2.2 Develop and customize security policies (continued).

    2.3 Develop a plan to gather feedback from users.

    2.4 Discuss a plan to submit policies for approval.

    3.1 Plan the communication strategy for new policies.

    3.2 Discuss myPolicies to automate management and implementation.

    3.3 Incorporate policies into your security awareness and training program.

    3.4 Assess the effectiveness of policies.

    3.5 Understand the need for regular review and update.

    4.1 Review customized lifecycle and policy templates.

    4.2 Discuss the plan for policy roll out.

    4.3 Schedule follow-up Guided Implementation calls.

    Deliverables
    1. Security Policy Prioritization Tool
    2. Security Policy Lifecycle
    1. Security Policies (approx. 9)
    1. Security Policies (approx. 9)
    1. Policy Communication Plan
    2. Security Awareness and Training Program Development Tool
    3. Security Policy Assessment Tool
    1. All deliverables finalized

    Develop and Deploy Security Policies

    Phase 1

    Define the Security Policy Program

    Phase 1

    1.1 Understand the current state

    1.2 Align your security policies to the Info-Tech framework

    1.3 Document your policy hierarchy

    1.4 Prioritize development of security policies

    1.5 Leverage stakeholders

    1.6 Develop the policy lifecycle

    Phase 2

    2.1 Customize policy templates

    2.2 Gather feedback from users on policy feasibility

    2.3 Submit policies to upper management for approval

    Phase 3

    3.1 Understand the need for communicating policies

    3.2 Use myPolicies to automate the management of your security policies

    3.3 Design, build, and implement your communications plan

    3.4 Incorporate policies and processes into your training and awareness programs

    Phase 4

    4.1 Assess the state of security policies

    4.2 Identify triggers for regular policy review and update

    4.3 Develop an action plan to update policies

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Understand the current state of your organization’s security policies.
    • Align your security policies to the Info-Tech framework for compliance.
    • Prioritize the development of your security policies.
    • Leverage key stakeholders to champion the policy initiative.
    • Inform all relevant stakeholders of the upcoming policy program.
    • Develop the security policy lifecycle.

    1.1 Understand the current state of policies

    Scenario 1: You have existing policies

    1. Use the Security Policy Prioritization Tool to identify any gaps between the policies you already have and those recommended based on your changing business needs.
    2. As your organization undergoes changes, be sure to incorporate new requirements in the existing policies.
    3. Sometimes, you may have more specific procedures for a domain’s individual security aspects instead of high-level policies.
    4. Group current policies into the domains and use the policy templates to create overarching policies where there are none and improve upon existing high-level policies.

    Scenario 2: You are starting from scratch

    1. To get started on new policies, use the Security Policy Prioritization Tool to identify the policies Info-Tech recommends based on your business needs. See the full list of templates in the Appendix to ensure that all relevant topics are addressed.
    2. Whether you’re starting from scratch or have incomplete/ad hoc policies, use Info-Tech’s policy templates to formalize and standardize security requirements for end users.
    Info-Tech Insight

    Policies are living, evolving documents that require regular review and update, so even if you have policies already written, you’re not done with them.

    1.2 Align your security policies to the Info-Tech framework for compliance

    You have an opportunity to improve your employee alignment and satisfaction, improve organizational agility, and obtain high policy adherence. This is achieved by translating your corporate culture into a policy-based compliance culture.

    Align your security policies to the Info-Tech Security Framework by using Info-Tech’s policy templates.

    Info-Tech’s security framework uses a best-of-breed approach to leverage and align with most major security standards, including:
    • ISO 27001/27002
    • COBIT
    • Center for Internet Security (CIS) Critical Controls
    • NIST Cybersecurity Framework
    • NIST SP 800-53
    • NIST SP 800-171

    Info-Tech Security Framework

    Info-Tech Security Framework with policies grouped into categories which are then grouped into 'Governance' and 'Management'.

    1.3 Document your policy hierarchy

    Structuring policy components at different levels allows for efficient changes and direct communication depending on what information is needed.

    Policy hierarchy pyramid with 'Security Policy Lifecycle' on top, then 'Security Policies', then 'IT and/or Supporting Documentation'.

    Defines the cycle for the security policy program and what must be done but not how to do it. Aligns the business, security program, and policies.
    Addresses the “what,” “who,” “when,” and “where.”

    Defines high-level overarching concepts of security within the organization, including the scope, purpose, and objectives of policies.
    Addresses the high-level “what” and “why.”
    Changes when business objectives change.

    Defines enterprise/technology – specific, detailed guidelines on how to adhere to policies.
    Addresses the “how.”
    Changes when technology and processes change.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Design separate policies for different areas of focus. Policies that are written as single, monolithic documents are resistant to change. A hierarchical top-level document supported by subordinate policies and/or procedures can be more rapidly revised as circumstances change.

    1.3.1 Understand the relationship between policies and other documents

    Policy:
    • Provides emphasis and sets direction.
    • Standards, guidelines, and procedures must be developed to support an overarching policy.
    Arrows stemming from the above list, connecting to the three lists below.

    Standard:

    • Specifies uniform method of support for policy.
    • Compliance is mandatory.
    • Includes process, frameworks, methodologies, and technology.
    Two-way horizontal arrow.

    Procedure:

    • Step-by-step instructions to perform desired actions.
    Two-way horizontal arrow.

    Guideline:

    Recommended actions to consider in absence of an applicable standard, to support a policy.
    This model is adapted from a framework developed by CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor).

    Supporting Documentation

    Considerations for standards

    Standards. These support policies by being much more specific and outlining key steps or processes that are necessary to meet certain requirements within a policy document. Ideally standards should be based on policy statements with a target of detailing the requirements that show how the organization will implement developed policies.

    If policies describe what needs to happen, then standards explain how it will happen.

    A good example is an email policy that states that emails must be encrypted; this policy can be supported by a standard such as Transport Layer Security (TLS) encryption that specifically ensures that all email communication is encrypted for messages “in transit” from one secure email server that has TLS enabled to another.

    There are numerous security standards available that support security policies/programs based on the kind of systems and controls that an organization would like to put in place. A good selection of supporting standards can go a long way to further protect users, data, and other organizational assets
    Key Policies Example Associated Standards
    Access Control Policy
    • Password Management User Standard
    • Account Auditing Standard
    Data Security Policy
    • Cryptography Standard
    • Data Classification Standard
    • Data Handling Standard
    • Data Retention Standard
    Incident Response Policy
    • Incident Response Plan
    Network Security Policy
    • Wireless Connectivity Standard
    • Firewall Configuration Standard
    • Network Monitoring Standard
    Vendor Management Policy
    • Vendor Risk Management Standard
    • Third-Party Access Control Standard
    Application Security Policy
    • Application Security Standard

    1.4 Prioritize development of security policies

    The Info-Tech Security Policy Prioritization Tool will help you determine which security policies to work on first.
    • The tool allows you to prioritize your policies based on:
      • Importance: How relevant is this policy to organizational security?
      • Ease to implement: What is the effort, time, and resources required to write, review, approve, and distribute the policy?
      • Ease to enforce: How much effort, time, and resources are required to enforce the policy?
    • Additionally, the weighting or priority of each variable of prioritization can be adjusted.

    Align policies to recent security concerns. If your organization has recently experienced a breach, it may be crucial to highlight corresponding policies as immediately necessary.

    Info-Tech Insight

    If you have an existing policy that aligns with one of the Info-Tech recommended templates weight Ease to Implement and Ease to Enforce as HIGH (4-5). This will decrease the priority of these policies.

    Sample of the Security Policy Prioritization Tool.

    Download the Security Policy Prioritization Tool

    1.5 Leverage stakeholders to champion policies

    Info-Tech Insight

    While management support is essential to initiating a strong security posture, allow employees to provide input on the development of security policies. This cooperation will lead to easier incorporation of the policies into the daily routines of workers, with less resistance. The security team will be less of a police force and more of a partner.

    Executive champion

    Identify an executive champion who will ensure that the security program and the security policies are supported.

    Focus on risk and protection

    Security can be viewed as an interference, but the business is likely more responsive to the concepts of risk and protection because it can apply to overall business operations and a revenue-generating mandate.

    Communicate policy initiatives

    Inform stakeholders of the policy initiative as security policies are only effective if they support the business requirements and user input is crucial for developing a strong security culture.

    Current security landscape

    Leveraging the current security landscape can be a useful mechanism to drive policy buy-in from stakeholders.

    Management buy-in

    This is key to policy acceptance; it indicates that policies are accurate, align with the business, and are to be upheld, that funds will be made available, and that all employees will be equally accountable.

    Customer Relationship Management Platform Selection Guide

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}529|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.2/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $14,719 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 32 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Customer Relationship Management
    • Parent Category Link: /customer-relationship-management
    • Customer relationship management (CRM) suites are an indispensable part of a holistic strategy for managing end-to-end customer interactions.
    • After defining an approach to CRM, selection and implementation of the right CRM suite is a critical step in delivering concrete business value for marketing, sales, and customer service.
    • Despite the importance of CRM selection and implementation, many organizations struggle to define an approach to picking the right vendor and rolling out the solution in an effective and cost-efficient manner.
    • IT often finds itself in the unenviable position of taking the fall for CRM platforms that don't deliver on the promise of the CRM strategy.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • IT needs to be a trusted partner in CRM selection and implementation, but the business also needs to own the requirements and be involved from the beginning.
    • CRM requirements dictate the components of the target CRM architecture, such as deployment model, feature focus, and customization level. Savvy application directors recognize the points in the project where the CRM architecture model necessitates deviations from a "canned" roll-out plan.
    • CRM selection is a multi-step process that involves mapping target capabilities for marketing, sales, and customer service, assigning requirements across functional categories, determining the architecture model to prioritize criteria, and developing a comprehensive RFP that can be scored in a weighted fashion.
    • Companies that succeed with CRM implementation create a detailed roadmap that outlines milestones for configuration, security, points of implementation, data migration, training, and ongoing application maintenance.

    Impact and Result

    • A CRM platform that effectively meets the needs of marketing, sales, and customer service and delivers value.
    • Reduced costs during CRM selection.
    • Reduced implementation costs and time frame.
    • Faster time to results after implementation.

    Customer Relationship Management Platform Selection Guide Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Customer Relationship Management Platform Selection Guide – Speed up the process to build your business case and select your CRM solution.

    This blueprint will help you build a business case for selecting the right CRM platform, defining key requirements, and conducting a thorough analysis and scan of the ever-evolving CRM market space.

    • Customer Relationship Management Platform Selection Guide — Phases 1-3

    2. CRM Business Case Template – Document the key drivers for selecting a new CRM platform.

    Having a sound business case is essential for succeeding with a CRM. This template will allow you to document key drivers and impact, in line with the CRM Platform Selection Guide blueprint.

    • CRM Business Case Template

    3. CRM Request for Proposal Template

    Create your own request for proposal (RFP) for your customer relationship management (CRM) solution procurement process by customizing the RFP template created by Info-Tech.

    • CRM Request for Proposal Template

    4. CRM Suite Evaluation and RFP Scoring Tool

    The CRM market has many strong contenders and differentiation may be difficult. Instead of relying solely on reputation, organizations can use this RFP tool to record and objectively compare vendors according to their specific requirements.

    • CRM Suite Evaluation and RFP Scoring Tool

    5. CRM Vendor Demo Script

    Use this template to support your business's evaluation of vendors and their solutions. Provide vendors with scenarios that prompt them to display not only their solution's capabilities, but also how the tool will support your organization's particular needs.

    • CRM Vendor Demo Script

    6. CRM Use Case Fit Assessment Tool

    Use this tool to help build a CRM strategy for the organization based on the specific use case that matches your organizational needs.

    • CRM Use-Case Fit Assessment Tool
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Customer Relationship Management Platform Selection Guide

    Speed up the process to build your business case and select your CRM solution.

    Table of Contents

    1. Analyst Perspective
    2. Executive Summary
    3. Blueprint Overview
    4. Executive Brief
    5. Phase 1: Understand CRM Functionality
    6. Phase 2: Build the Business Case and Elicit CRM requirements
    7. Phase 3: Discover the CRM Marketspace and Prepare for Implementation
    8. Conclusion

    Analyst Perspective

    A strong CRM platform is paramount to succeeding with customer engagement.

    Modern CRM platforms are the workhorses that provide functional capabilities and data curation for customer experience management. The market for CRM platforms has seen an explosion of growth over the last five years, as organizations look to mature their ability to deliver strong capabilities across marketing, sales, and customer service.

    IT needs to be a trusted partner in CRM selection and implementation, but the business also needs to own the requirements and be involved from the get-go.

    CRM selection must be a multistep process that involves defining target capabilities for marketing, sales, and customer service, prioritizing requirements across functional categories, determining the architecture model for the CRM environment, and developing a comprehensive RFP that can be scored in a weighted fashion.

    To succeed with CRM implementation, create a detailed roadmap that outlines milestones for configuration, security, points of implementation, data migration, training, and ongoing application maintenance.

    Photo of Ben Dickie, Research Lead, Customer Experience Strategy, Info-Tech Research Group. Ben Dickie
    Research Lead, Customer Experience Strategy
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    Customer Relationship Management (CRM) suites are an indispensable part of a holistic strategy for managing end-to-end customer interactions. Selecting the right platform that aligns with your requirements is a significant undertaking.

    After defining an approach to CRM, selection and implementation of the right CRM suite is a critical step in delivering concrete business value for marketing, sales, and customer service.
    Common Obstacles

    Despite the importance of CRM selection and implementation, many organizations struggle to define an approach to picking the right vendor and rolling out the solution in an effective and cost-efficient manner.

    The CRM market is rapidly evolving and changing, making it tricky to stay on top of the space.

    IT often finds itself in the unenviable position of taking the fall for CRM platforms that don’t deliver on the promise of the CRM strategy.
    Info-Tech’s Approach

    CRM platform selection must be driven by your overall customer experience management strategy: link your CRM selection to your organization’s CXM framework.

    Determine if you need a CRM platform that skews toward marketing, sales, or customer service; leverage use cases to help guide selection.

    Ensure strong points of integration between CRM and other software such as MMS. A CRM should not live in isolation; it must provide a 360-degree view.

    Info-Tech Insight

    IT must work in lockstep with its counterparts in marketing, sales, and customer service to define a unified vision for the CRM platform.

    Info-Tech’s methodology for selecting the right CRM platform

    1. Understand CRM Features 2. Build the Business Case & Elicit CRM Requirements 3. Discover the CRM Market Space & Prepare for Implementation
    Phase Steps
    1. Define CRM platforms
    2. Classify table stakes & differentiating capabilities
    3. Explore CRM trends
    1. Build the business case
    2. Streamline requirements elicitation for CRM
    3. Construct the RFP
    1. Discover key players in the CRM landscape
    2. Engage the shortlist & select finalist
    3. Prepare for implementation
    Phase Outcomes
    • Consensus on scope of CRM and key CRM capabilities
    • CRM selection business case
    • Top-level use cases and requirements
    • Completed CRM RFP
    • CRM market analysis
    • Shortlisted vendor
    • Implementation considerations

    Guided Implementation

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    The CRM purchase process should be broken into segments:

    1. CRM vendor shortlisting with this buyer’s guide
    2. Structured approach to selection
    3. Contract review

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    Phase 3

    Call #1: Understand what a CRM platform is and the “art of the possible” for sales, marketing, and customer service. Call #2: Build the business case to select a CRM.

    Call #3: Define your key CRM requirements.

    Call #4: Build procurement items such as an RFP.
    Call #5: Evaluate the CRM solution landscape and shortlist viable options.

    Call #6: Review implementation considerations.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    INFO~TECH RESEARCH GROUP

    Customer Relationship Management Platform Selection Guide

    Speed up the process to build your business case and select your CRM solution.

    EXECUTIVE BRIEF

    Info-Tech Research Group Inc. is a global leader in providing IT research and advice. Info-Tech’s products and services combine actionable insight and relevant advice with ready-to-use tools and templates that cover the full spectrum of IT concerns.
    © 1997-2022 Info-Tech Research Group Inc.

    What exactly is a CRM platform?

    Our Definition: A customer relationship management (CRM) platform (or suite) is a core enterprise application that provides a broad feature set for supporting customer interaction processes, typically across marketing, sales and customer service. These suites supplant more basic applications for customer interaction management (such as the contact management module of an enterprise resource planning (ERP) platform or office productivity suite).

    A customer relationship management suite provides many key capabilities, including but not limited to:

    • Account management
    • Order history tracking
    • Pipeline management
    • Case management
    • Campaign management
    • Reports and analytics
    • Customer journey execution

    A CRM suite provides a host of native capabilities, but many organizations elect to tightly integrate their CRM solution with other parts of their customer experience ecosystem to provide a 360-degree view of their customers.

    Stock image of a finger touching a screen showing a stock chart.

    Info-Tech Insight

    CRM feature sets are rapidly evolving. Focus on the social component of sales, marketing, and service management features, as well as collaboration, to get the best fit for your requirements. Moreover, consider investing in best-of-breed social media management platforms (SMMPs) and internal collaboration tools to ensure sufficient functionality.

    Build a cohesive CRM selection approach that aligns business goals with CRM capabilities.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Customers expect to interact with organizations through the channels of their choice. Now more than ever, you must enable your organization to provide tailored customer experiences.

    Customer expectations are on the rise: meet them!

    A CRM platform is a crucial system for enabling good customer experiences.

    CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE IS EVOLVING

    1. Thoughtfulness is in
        Connect with customers on a personal level
    2. Service over products
        The experience is more important than the product
    3. Culture is now number one
        Culture is the most overlooked piece of customer experience strategy
    4. Engineering and service finally join forces
        Companies are combining their technology and service efforts to create strong feedback loops
    5. The B2B world is inefficiently served
        B2B needs to step up with more tools and a greater emphasis placed on customer experience

    (Source: Forbes, 2019)

    Identifying organizational objectives of high priority will assist in breaking down business needs and CRM objectives. This exercise will better align the CRM systems with the overall corporate strategy and achieve buy-in from key stakeholders.

    A strong CRM platform supports a range of organizational objectives for customer engagement.

    Increase Revenue Enable lead scoring Deploy sales collateral management tools Improve average cost per lead via a marketing automation tool
    Enhance Market Share Enhance targeting effectiveness with a CRM Increase social media presence via an SMMP Architect customer intelligence analysis
    Improve Customer Satisfaction Reduce time-to-resolution via better routing Increase accessibility to customer service with live chat Improve first contact resolution with customer KB
    Increase Customer Retention Use a loyalty management application Improve channel options for existing customers Use customer analytics to drive targeted offers
    Create Customer-Centric Culture Ensure strong training and user adoption programs Use CRM to provide 360-degree view of all customer interactions Incorporate the voice of the customer into product development

    Succeeding with CRM selection and implementation has a positive effect on driving revenues and decreasing costs

    There are three buckets of metrics and KPIs where CRM will drive improvements

    The metrics of a smooth CRM selection and implementation process include:

    • Better alignment of CRM functionality to business needs.
    • Better functionality coverage of the selected platform.
    • Decreased licensing costs via better vendor negotiation.
    • Improved end-user satisfaction with the deployed solution.
    • Fewer errors and rework during implementation.
    • Reduced total implementation costs.
    • Reduced total implementation time.

    A successful CRM deployment drives revenue

    • Increased customer acquisition due to enhanced accuracy of segmentation and targeting, superior lead qualification, and pipeline management.
    • Increased customer satisfaction and retention due to targeted campaigns (e.g. customer-specific deals), quicker service incident resolution, and longitudinal relationship management.
    • Increased revenue per customer due to comprehensive lifecycle management tools, social engagement, and targeted upselling of related products and services (enabled by better reporting/analytics).

    A successful CRM deployment decreases cost

    • Deduplication of effort across business domains as marketing, sales, and service now have a common repository of customer information and interaction tools.
    • Increased sales and service agent efficiency due to their focus on selling and resolution, rather than administrative tasks and overhead.
    • Reduced cost-to-sell and cost-to-serve due to automation of activities that were manually intensive.
    • Reduced cost of accurate data due to embedded reporting and analytics functionality.

    CRM platforms sit at the core of a well-rounded customer engagement ecosystem

    At the center is 'Customer Relationship Management Platform' surrounded by 'Web Experience Management Platform', 'E-Commerce & Point-of-Sale Solutions', 'Social Media Management Platform', 'Customer Intelligence Platform', 'Customer Service Management Tools', and 'Marketing Management Suite'.

    Customer Experience Management (CXM) Portfolio

    Customer relationship management platforms are increasingly expansive in functional scope and foundational to an organization’s customer engagement strategy. Indeed, CRMs form the centerpiece for a comprehensive CXM system, alongside tools such as customer intelligence platforms and adjacent point solutions for sales, marketing, and customer service.

    Review Info-Tech’s CXM blueprint below to build a complete, end-to-end customer interaction solution portfolio that encompasses CRM alongside other critical components. The CXM blueprint also allows you to develop strategic requirements for CRM based on customer personas and external market analysis.

    Build a Strong Technology Foundation for Customer Experience Management

    Sample of the 'Build a Strong Technology Foundation for Customer Experience Management' blueprint. Design an end-to-end technology strategy to drive sales revenue, enhance marketing effectiveness, and create compelling experiences for your customers.

    View the blueprint

    Considering a CRM switch? Switching software vendors drives high satisfaction

    Eighty percent of organizations are more satisfied after changing their software vendor.

    • Most organizations see not only a positive change in satisfaction with their new vendor, but also a substantial change in satisfaction.
    • What matters is making sure your organization is well-positioned to make a switch.
    • When it comes to switching software vendors, the grass really can be greener on the other side.

    Over half of organizations are 60%+ more satisfied after changing their vendor.

    (Source: Info-Tech Research Group, "Switching Software Vendors Overwhelmingly Drives Increased Satisfaction", 2020.)

    IT is critical to the success of your CRM selection and rollout

    Today’s shared digital landscape of the CIO and CMO

    Info-Tech Insight

    Technology is the key enabler of building strong customer experiences: IT must stand shoulder to shoulder with the business to develop a technology framework for customer relationship management.

    CIO

    IT Operations

    Service Delivery and Management

    IT Support

    IT Systems and Application

    IT Strategy and Governance

    Cybersecurity
    Collaboration and Partnership

    Digital Strategy = Transformation
    Business Goals | Innovation | Leadership | Rationalization

    Customer Experience
    Architecture | Design | Omnichannel Delivery | Management

    Insight (Market Facing)
    Analytics | Business Intelligence | Machine Learning | AI

    Marketing Integration + Operating Model
    Apps | Channels | Experiences | Data | Command Center

    Master Data
    Customer | Audience | Industry | Digital Marketing Assets
    CMO

    PEO Media

    Brand Management

    Campaign Management

    Marketing Tech

    Marketing Ops

    Privacy, Trust, and Regulatory Requirements

    (Source: ZDNet, 2020)

    CRM by the numbers

    1/3

    Statistical analysis of CRM projects indicates failures vary from 18% to 69%. Taking an average of those analyst reports, about one-third of CRM projects are considered a failure. (Source: CIO Magazine, 2017)

    92%

    92% of organizations report that CRM use is important for accomplishing revenue objectives. (Source: Hall, 2020)

    40%

    In 2019, 40% of executives name customer experience the top priority for their digital transformation. (Source: CRM Magazine, 2019)

    Case Study

    Align strategy and technology to meet consumer demand.
    INDUSTRY
    Entertainment
    SOURCE
    Forbes, 2017
    Challenge

    Beginning as a mail-out service, Netflix offered subscribers a catalog of videos to select from and have mailed to them directly. Customers no longer had to go to a retail store to rent a video. However, the lack of immediacy of direct mail as the distribution channel resulted in slow adoption.

    Blockbuster was the industry leader in video retail but was lagging in its response to industry, consumer, and technology trends around customer experience.

    Solution

    In response to the increasing presence of tech-savvy consumers on the internet, Netflix invested in developing its online platform as its primary distribution channel. The benefit of doing so was two-fold: passive brand advertising (by being present on the internet) and meeting customer demands for immediacy and convenience. Netflix also recognized the rising demand for personalized service and created an unprecedented, tailored customer experience.

    Results

    Netflix’s disruptive innovation is built on the foundation of great customer experience management. Netflix is now a $28-billion company, which is tenfold what Blockbuster was worth.

    Netflix used disruptive technologies to innovatively build a customer experience that put it ahead of the long-time video rental industry leader, Blockbuster.

    CRM Buyer’s Guide

    Phase 1

    Understand CRM Features

    Phase 1

    1.1 Define CRM platforms

    1.2 Classify table stakes & differentiating capabilities

    1.3 Explore CRM trends

    Phase 2

    2.1 Build the business case

    2.2 Streamline requirements elicitation for CRM

    2.3 Construct the RFP

    Phase 3

    3.1 Discover key players in the CRM landscape

    3.2 Engage the shortlist & select finalist

    3.3 Prepare for implementation

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Set a level of understanding of CRM technology.
    • Define which CRM features are table stakes (standard) and which are differentiating.
    • Identify the “Art of the Possible” in a modern CRM from a sales, marketing, and service lens.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • Applications manager
    • Project manager
    • Sales executive
    • Marketing executive
    • Customer service executive

    Understand CRM table stakes features

    Organizations can expect nearly all CRM vendors to provide the following functionality.

    Lead Management Pipeline Management Contact Management Campaign Management Customer Service Management
    • Tracks and captures a lead’s information, automatically building a profile. Leads are then qualified through contact scoring models. Assigning leads to sales is typically automated.
    • Enables oversight over future sales. Includes revenue forecasting based on past/present trends, tracking sales velocity, and identifying ineffective sales processes.
    • Tracks and stores customer data, including demography, account and billing history, social media, and contact information. Typically, records and fields can be customized.
    • Provides integrated omnichannel campaign functionality and data analysis of customer intelligence. Data insights can be used to drive new and effective marketing campaigns.
    • Provides integrated omnichannel customer experiences to provide convenient service. Includes case and ticket management, automated escalation rules, and third-party integrations.

    Identify differentiating CRM features

    While not always “must-have” functionality, these features may be the final dealbreaker when deciding between two CRM vendors.

    Image of clustered screens with various network and business icons surounding them.
    • Workflow Automation
      Automate repetitive tasks by creating workflows that trigger actions or send follow-up reminders for next steps.
    • Advanced Analytics and Reporting
      Provides customized dashboard visualizations, detailed reporting, AI-driven virtual assistants, data extraction & analysis, and ML forecasting.
    • Customizations and Open APIs
      Broad range of available customizations (e.g. for dashboards and fields), alongside ease of integration (e.g. via plugins or APIs).
    • Document Management
      Out-of-the-box centralized content repository for storing, uploading, and sharing documents.
    • Mobile Support
      Ability to support mobile devices, OSes, and platforms with a native application or HTML-based web-access.
    • Project and Task Management
      Native project and task management functionality, enhancing cross-team organization and communication.
    • Configure, Price, Quote (CPQ)
      Create and send quotes or proposals to prospective and current customers.

    Features aren’t everything – be wary of common CRM selection pitfalls

    You can have all the right features, but systemic problems will lead to poor CRM implementation. Dig out these root causes first to ensure a successful CRM selection.

    50% of organizations believe the quality of their CRM data is “very poor” or “neutral.”

    Without addressing data governance issues, CRMs will only be as good as your data.

    Source: (Validity 2020)
    27% of organizations report that bad data costs them 10% or more in lost revenue annually.
    42% rate the trust that users have in their data as “high” or “very high.”
    54% believe that sales forecasts are accurate or very accurate.
    69% attribute poor CRM governance to missing or incomplete data, followed by duplicate data, incorrect data, and expired data. Other data issues include siloed data or disparate systems.
    73% believe that they do not have a 360-degree view of their customers.

    Ensure you understand the “art of the possible” in the CRM landscape

    Knowing what is possible will help funnel which features are most suitable for your organization – having all the bells and whistles does not always equal strong ROI.

    Holistically examine the potential of any CRM solution through three main lenses: Stock image of a person working with dashboards.

    Sales

    Identify sales opportunities through recording customers’ interactions, generating leads, nurturing contacts, and forecasting revenues.
    Stock image of people experiencing digital ideas.

    Marketing

    Analyze customer interactions to identify upsell and cross-sell opportunities, drive customer loyalty, and use customer data for targeted campaigns.
    Stock image of a customer service representative.

    Customer Service

    Improve and optimize customer engagement and retention, leveraging customer data to provide round-the-clock omnichannel experiences.

    Art of the possible: Sales

    Stock image of a person working with dashboards.

    TRACK PROSPECT INTERACTIONS

    Want to engage with a prospect but don’t know what to lead with? CRM solutions can track and analyze many of the interactions a prospect has with your organization, including with fellow staff, their clickthrough rate on marketing material, and what services they are downloading on your website. This information can then auto-generate tasks to begin lead generation.

    COORDINATE LEAD SCORING

    Information captured from a prospect is generated into contact cards; missing data (such as name and company) can be auto-captured by the CRM via crawling sites such as LinkedIn. The CRM then centralizes and scores (according to inputted business rules) a lead’s potential, ensuring sales teams coordinate and keep a track of the lead’s journey without wrongful interference.

    AI-DRIVEN REVENUE FORECASTING

    Generate accurate forecasting reports using AI-driven “virtual assistants” within the CRM platform. These assistants are personal data scientists, quickly noting discrepancies, opportunities, and what-if scenarios – tasks that might take weeks to do manually. This pulled data is then auto-forecasted, with the ability to flexibly adjust to real-time data.

    Art of the possible: Marketing

    Stock image of people experiencing digital ideas.

    DRIVE LOYALTY

    Data captured and analyzed in the CRM from customer interactions builds profiles and a deeper understanding of customers’ interests. With this data, marketing teams can deliver personalized promotions and customer service to enhance loyalty – from sending a discount on a product the customer was browsing on the website, to providing notifications about delivery statuses.

    AUTOMATE WORKFLOWS

    Building customer profiles, learning spending habits, and charting a customer’s journey for upselling or cross-selling can be automated through workflows, saving hours of manual work. These workflows can immediately respond to customer enquiries or deliver offers to the customer’s preferred channel based on their prior usage.

    TARGETED CAMPAIGNING

    Information attained through a CRM platform directly informs any marketing strategy: identifying customer segments, spending habits, building a better product based on customer feedback, and identifying high-spending customers. With any new product or offering, it is straightforward for marketing teams to understand where to target their next campaign for highest impact.

    Art of the possible: Customer service

    Stock image of a customer service representative.

    OMNICHANNEL SUPPORT

    Rapidly changing demographics and modes of communications require an evolution toward omnichannel engagement. Many customers now expect to communicate with contact centers not just by voice, but via social media. Agents need customer information synced across each channel they use, meeting the customer’s needs where they are.

    INTELLIGENT SELF-SERVICE PORTALS

    Customers want their issues resolved as quickly as possible. Machine-learning self-service options deliver personalized customer experiences, which also reduce both agent call volume and support costs for the organization.

    LEVERAGING ANALYTICS

    The future of customer service is tied up with analytics. This not only entails AI-driven capabilities that fetch the agent relevant information, skills-based routing, and using biometric data (e.g. speech) for security. It also feeds operations leaders’ need for easy access to real insights about how their customers and agents are doing.

    Best-of-Breed Point Solutions

    Full CRM Suite

    Blue smiley face. Benefits
    • Features may be more advanced for specific functional areas and a higher degree of customization may be possible.
    • If a potential delay in real-time customer data transfer is acceptable, best-of-breeds provide a similar level of functionality to suites for a lower price.
    • Best-of-breeds allow value to be realized faster than suites, as they are easier and faster to implement and configure.
    • Rip and replace is easier, and vendor updates are relatively quick to market.
    Benefits
    • Everyone in the organization works from the same set of customer data.
    • There is a “lowest common denominator” for agent learning as consistent user interfaces lower learning curves and increase efficiency in usage.
    • There is a broader range of functionality using modules.
    • Integration between functional areas will be strong and the organization will be in a better position to enable version upgrades without risking invalidation of an integration point between separate systems.
    Green smiley face.
    Purple frowny face. Challenges
    • Best-of-breeds typically cover less breadth of functionality than suites.
    • There is a lack of uniformity in user experience across best-of-breeds.
    • Data integrity risks are higher.
    • Variable infrastructure may be implemented due to multiple disparate systems, which adds to architecture complexity and increased maintenance.
    • There is potential for redundant functionality across multiple best-of-breeds.
    Challenges
    • Suites exhibit significantly higher costs compared to point solutions.
    • Suite module functionality may not have the same depth as point solutions.
    • Due to high configuration availability and larger-scale implementation requirements, the time to deploy is longer than point solutions.
    Orange frowny face.
    Info-Tech Insight

    Even if a suite is missing a potential module, the proliferation of app extensions, integrations, and services could provide a solution. Salesforce’s AppExchange, for instance, offers a plethora of options to extend its CRM solution – from telephony integration, to gamification.

    CRM Buyer’s Guide

    Phase 2

    Build the Business Case & Elicit CRM Requirements

    Phase 1

    1.1 Define CRM platforms

    1.2 Classify table stakes & differentiating capabilities

    1.3 Explore CRM trends

    Phase 2

    2.1 Build the business case

    2.2 Streamline requirements elicitation for CRM

    2.3 Construct the RFP

    Phase 3

    3.1 Discover key players in the CRM landscape

    3.2 Engage the shortlist & select finalist

    3.3 Prepare for implementation

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify goals, objectives, challenges, and costs to inform the business case for a new CRM platform.
    • Elicit and prioritize key requirements for your platform.
    • Port the requirements into Info-Tech’s CRM RFP Template.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • Applications manager
    • Project manager
    • Sales executive
    • Marketing executive
    • Customer service executive

    Right-size the CRM selection team to ensure you get the right information but are still able to move ahead quickly

    Full-Time Resourcing: At least one of these five team members must be allocated to the selection initiative as a full-time resource.

    A silhouetted figure.

    IT Leader

    A silhouetted figure.

    Technical Lead

    A silhouetted figure.

    Business Analyst/
    Project Manager

    A silhouetted figure.

    Business Lead

    A silhouetted figure.

    Process Expert(s)

    This team member is an IT director or CIO who will provide sponsorship and oversight from the IT perspective. This team member will focus on application security, integration, and enterprise architecture. This team member elicits business needs and translates them into technology requirements. This team member will provide sponsorship from the business needs perspective. Typically, a CMO or SVP of sales. These team members are the sales, marketing, and service process owners who will help steer the CRM requirements and direction.

    Info-Tech Insight

    It is critical for the selection team to determine who has decision rights. Organizational culture will play the largest role in dictating which team member holds the final say for selection decisions. For more information on stakeholder management and involvement, see this guide.

    Be prepared to define what issues you are trying to address and why a new CRM is the right approach

    Identify the current state and review the background of what you’ve done leading up to this point, goals you’ve been asked to meet, and challenges in solving known problems to help to set the stage for why your proposed solution is needed. If your process improvements have taken you as far as you can go without improved workflows or data, specify where the gaps are.
    Arrows with icons related to the text on the right merging into one arrow. Alignment

    Alignment to strategic goals is always important, but that is especially true with CRM because customer relationship management platforms are at the intersection of your organization and your customers. What are the strategic marketing, sales and customer service goals that you want to realize (in whole or in part) by improving your CRM ecosystem?

    Impact to your business

    Identify areas where your customers may be impacted by poor experiences due to inadequate or aging technology. What’s the impact on customer retention? On revenue?

    Impact to your organization

    Define how internal stakeholders within the organization are impacted by a sub-optimal CRM experience – what are their frustrations and pain points? How do issues with your current CRM environment prevent teams in sales, marketing, or service from doing their jobs?

    Impact to your department

    Describe the challenges within IT of using disparate systems, workarounds, poor data and reporting, lack of automation, etc., and the effect these challenges have on IT’s goals.

    Align the CRM strategy with the corporate strategy

    Corporate Strategy Unified Strategy CRM Strategy
    Spectrum spanning all columns.
    Your corporate strategy:
    • Conveys the current state of the organization and the path it wants to take.
    • Identifies future goals and business aspirations.
    • Communicates the initiatives that are critical for getting the organization from its current state to the future state.
    • The CRM strategy and the rationale for deploying a new CRM can be and should be linked, with metrics, to the corporate strategy and ultimate business objectives (such as improving customer acquisition, entering new segments, or improving customer lifetime value).
    Your CRM strategy:
    • Communicates the organization’s budget and spending on CRM.
    • Identifies IT initiatives that will support the business and key CRM objectives.
    • Outlines staffing and resourcing for CRM initiatives.
    CRM projects are more successful when the management team understands the strategic importance and the criticality of alignment. Time needs to be spent upfront aligning business strategies with CRM capabilities. Effective alignment between sales, marketing, customer service, operations, IT, and the business should happen daily. Alignment doesn’t just need to occur at the executive level, but also at each level of the organization.

    2.1 Create your list of goals and milestones for CRM

    1-3 hours

    Input: Corporate strategy, Target key performance indicators, End-user satisfaction results (if applicable)

    Output: Prioritized list of goals with milestones that can be met with a new or improved CRM solution

    Materials: Whiteboard/flip charts, CRM Business Case Template

    Participants: CIO, Application managers, CMO/SVP sales, Marketing, sales or service SMEs

    1. Review strategic goals to identify alignment to your CRM selection project. For example, digital transformation may be enhanced or enabled with a CRM solution that supports better outreach to key customer segments through improved campaign management.
    2. Next, brainstorm tactical goals with your colleagues.
    3. Identify specific goals the organization has set for the business that may be supported by improved customer prospecting, customer service, or analytics functionality through a better CRM solution.
    4. Identify specific goals your organization will be able to make possible with a new or improved CRM solution.
    5. Prioritize this list and lead with the most important goal that can be reached at the one-year, six-month, and three-month milestones.
    6. Document in the goals section of your business case.

    Download the CRM Business Case Template and record the outputs of this exercise in the strategic business goals, business drivers, and technical drivers slides.

    Identify what challenges exist with the current environment

    Ensure you are identifying issues at a high level, so as not to drown in detail, but still paint the right picture. Identify technical issues that are impacting customer experience or business goals. Typical complaints for CRM solutions that are old or have been outgrown include:

    1.

    Lack of a flexible, configurable customer data model that supports complex relationships between accounts and contacts.

    2.

    Lack of a flexible, configurable customer data model that supports complex relationships between accounts and contacts.

    3.

    Lack of meaningful reports and useable dashboards, or difficulty in surfacing them.

    4.

    Poor change enablement resulting in business interruptions.

    5.

    Inability to effectively automate routine sales, marketing, or service tasks at scale via a workflow tool.

    6.

    Lack of proper service management features, such as service knowledge management.

    7.

    Inability to ingest customer data at scale (for example, no ability to automatically log e-mails or calls).

    8.

    Major technical deficiencies and outages – the incumbent CRM platform goes down, causing business disruption.

    9.

    The platform itself doesn’t exist in the current state – everything is done in Microsoft Excel!

    Separate business issues from technical issues, but highlight where they’re connected and where technical issues are causing business issues or preventing business goals from being reached.

    Before switching vendors, evaluate your existing CRM to see if it’s being underutilized or could use an upgrade

    The cost of switching vendors can be challenging, but it will depend entirely on the quality of data and whether it makes sense to keep it.
    • Achieving success when switching vendors first requires reflection. We need to ask why we are dissatisfied with our incumbent software.
    • If the product is old and inflexible, the answer may be obvious, but don’t be afraid to include your incumbent in your evaluation if your issues might be solved with an upgrade.
    • Look at your use-case requirements to see where you want to take the CRM solution and compare them to your incumbent’s roadmap. If they don’t match, switching vendors may be the only solution. If your roadmaps align, see if you’re fully leveraging the solution or will be able to start working through process improvements.
    Pie graph with a 20% slice. Pie graph with a 25% slice.

    20%

    Small/Medium Enterprises

    25%

    Large Enterprises
    only occasionally or rarely/never use their software (Source: Software Reviews, 2020; N = 45,027)
    Fully leveraging your current software now will have two benefits:
    1. It may turn out that poor leveraging of your incumbent software was the problem all along; switching vendors won’t solve the problem by itself. As the data to the right shows, a fifth of small/medium enterprises and a quarter of large enterprises do not fully leverage their incumbent software.
    2. If you still decide to switch, you’ll be in a good negotiating position. If vendors can see you are engaged and fully leveraging your software, they will be less complacent during negotiations to win you over.
    Info-Tech Insight

    Switching vendors won’t improve poor internal processes. To be fully successful and meet the goals of the business case, new software implementations must be accompanied by process review and improvement.

    2.2 Create your list of challenges as they relate to your goals and their impacts

    1-2 hours

    Input: Goals lists, Target key performance indicators, End-user satisfaction results (if applicable)

    Output: Prioritized list of challenges preventing or hindering customer experiences

    Materials: Whiteboard/flip charts, CRM Business Case Template

    Participants: CIO, Application managers, CMO/SVP sales, Marketing, sales, or service SMEs

    1. Brainstorm with your colleagues to discuss your challenges with CRM today from an application and process lens.
    2. Identify how these challenges are impacting your ability to meet the goals and identify any that are creating customer-facing issues.
    3. Group together like areas and arrange in order of most impactful. Identify which of these issues will be most relevant to the business case for a new CRM platform.
    4. Document in the current-state section of your business case.
    5. Discuss and determine if the incumbent solution can meet your needs or if you’ll need to replace it with a different product.

    Download the CRM Business Case Template and document the outputs of this exercise in the current-state section of your business case.

    Determine costs of the solution

    Ensure the business case includes both internal and external costs related to the new CRM platform, allocating costs of project managers to improve accuracy of overall costs and level of success.

    CRM solutions include application costs and costs to design processes, install, and configure. These start-up costs can be a significant factor in whether the initial purchase is feasible.

    CRM Vendor Costs

    • Application licensing
    • Implementation and configuration
    • Professional services
    • Maintenance and support
    • Training
    • 3rd Party add-ons
    • Data transformation
    • Integration
    When thinking about vendor costs, also consider the matching internal cost associated with the vendor activity (e.g. data cleansing, internal support).

    Internal Costs

    • Project management
    • Business readiness
    • Change management
    • Resourcing (user groups, design/consulting, testing)
    • Training
    • Auditors (if regulatory requirements need vetting)
    Project management is a critical success factor at all stages of an enterprise application initiative from planning to post-implementation. Ensuring that costs for such critical areas are accurately represented will contribute to success.

    Download the blueprint Improve Your Statements of Work to Hold Your Vendors Accountable to define requirements for installation and configuration.

    Bring in the right resources to guarantee success. Work with the PMO or project manager to get help with creating the SOW.

    60% of IT projects are NOT finished “mostly or always” on time (Wellingtone, 2018).

    55% of IT personnel feel that the business objectives of their software projects are clear to them (Geneca, 2017).

    Document costs and expected benefits of the new CRM

    The business case should account for the timing of both expenditures and benefits. It is naïve to expect straight-line benefit realization or a big-bang cash outflow related to the solution implementation. Proper recognition and articulation of ramp-up time will make your business case more convincing.

    Make sure your timelines are realistic for benefits realization, as these will be your project milestones and your metrics for success.

    Example:
    Q1-Q2 Q3-Q6 Q6 Onwards

    Benefits at 25%

    At the early stages of an implementation, users are still learning the new system and go-live issues are being addressed. Most of the projected process improvements are likely to be low, zero, or even negative.

    Benefits at 75%

    Gradually, as processes become more familiar, an organization can expect to move closer to realizing the forecasted benefits or at least be in a position to recognize a positive trend toward their realization.

    Benefits at 100%

    In an ideal world, all projected benefits are realized at 100% or higher. This can be considered the stage where processes have been mastered, the system is operating smoothly, and change has been broadly adopted. In reality, benefits are often overestimated.

    Costs at 50%

    As with benefits, some costs may not kick in until later in the process or when the application is fully operational. In the early phases of implementation, factor in the cost of overlapping technology where you’ll need to run redundant systems and transition any data.

    Costs at 100%

    Costs are realized quicker than benefits as implementation activities are actioned, licensing and maintenance costs are introduced, and resourcing is deployed to support vendor activities internally. Costs that were not live in the early stages are an operational reality at this stage.

    Costs at 100%+

    Costs can be expected to remain relatively static past a certain point, if estimates accurately represented all costs. In many instances, costs can exceed original estimates in the business case, where costs were either underestimated, understated, or missed.

    2.3 Document your costs and expected benefits

    1-2 hours

    Input: Quotes with payment schedule, Budget

    Output: Estimated payment schedule and cost breakdown

    Materials: Spreadsheet or whiteboard, CRM Business Case Template

    Participants: CIO, Application managers, CMO/SVP sales, Marketing, sales, or service SMEs

    1. Estimate costs for the CRM solution. If you’re working with a vendor, provide the initial requirements to quote; otherwise, estimate as closely as you’re able.
    2. Calculate the five-year total cost for the solution to ensure the long-term budget is calculated.
    3. Break down costs for licenses, implementation, training, internal support, and hardware or hosting fees.
    4. Determine a reasonable breakdown of costs for the first year.
    5. Identify where residual costs of the old system may factor in if there are remaining contract obligations during the technology transition.
    6. Create a list of benefits expected to be realized within the same timeline.

    Sample of the table on the previous slide.

    Download the CRM Business Case Template and document the outputs of this exercise in the current-state section of your business case.

    Identify risks and dependencies to mitigate barriers to success as you look to roll out a CRM suite

    A risk assessment will be helpful to better understand what risks need to be mitigated to make the project a success and what risks are pending should the solution not be approved or be delayed.

    Risk Criteria Relevant Questions
    Timeline Uncertainty
    • How much risk is associated with the timeline of the CRM project?
    • Is this timeline realistic and can you reach some value in the first year?
    Success of Similar Projects
    • Have we undertaken previous projects that are similar?
    • Were those successful?
    • Did we note any future steps for improvement?
    Certainty of Forecasts
    • Where have the numbers originated?
    • How comfortable are the sponsors with the revenue and cost forecasts?
    Chance of Cost Overruns
    • How likely is the project to have cost overruns?
    • How much process and design work needs to be done prior to implementation?
    Resource Availability
    • Is this a priority project?
    • How likely are resourcing issues from a technical and business perspective?
    • Do we have the right resources?
    Change During Delivery
    • How volatile is the area in which the project is being implemented?
    • Are changes in the environment likely?
    • How complex are planned integrations?

    2.4 Identify risks to the success of the solution rollout and mitigation plan

    1-2 hours

    Input: List of goals and challenges, Target key performance indicators

    Output: Prioritized list of challenges preventing or hindering improvements for the IT teams

    Materials: Whiteboard/flip charts, CRM Business Case Template

    Participants: CIO, Application managers, CMO/SVP sales, Marketing, sales, or service SMEs

    1. Brainstorm with your colleagues to discuss potential roadblocks and risks that could impact the success of the CRM project.
    2. Identify how these risks could impact your project.
    3. Document the ones that are most likely to occur and derail the project.
    4. Discuss potential solutions to mitigate risks.

    Download the CRM Business Case Template and document the outputs of this exercise in the risk and dependency section of your business case. If the risk assessment needs to be more complex, complete the Risk Indicator Analysis in Info-Tech’s Business Case Workbook.

    Start requirements gathering by identifying your most important use cases across sales, marketing, and service

    Add to your business case by identifying which top-level use cases will meet your goals.

    Examples of target use cases for a CRM project include:

    • Enhance sales acquisition capabilities (i.e. via pipeline management)
    • Enhance customer upsell and cross-sell capabilities
    • Improve customer segmentation and targeting capabilities for multi-channel marketing campaigns
    • Strengthen customer care capabilities to improve customer satisfaction and retention (i.e. via improved case management and service knowledge management)
    • Create actionable insights via enhanced reporting and analytics

    Info-Tech Insight

    Lead with the most important benefit and consider the timeline. Can you reach that goal and report success to your stakeholders within the first year? As you look toward that one-year goal, you can consider secondary benefits, some of which may be opportunities to bring early value in the solution.

    Benefits of a successful deployment of use cases will include:
    • Improved customer satisfaction
    • Improved operational efficiencies
    • Reduced customer turnover
    • Increased platform uptime
    • License or regulatory compliance
    • Positioned for growth

    Typically, we see business benefits in this order of importance. Lead with the outcome that is most important to your stakeholders.

    • Net income increases
    • Revenue generators
    • Cost reductions
    • Improved customer service

    Consider perspectives of each stakeholder to ensure functionality needs are met and high satisfaction results

    Best of breed vs. “good enough” is an important discussion and will feed your success.

    Costs can be high when customizing an ill-fitting module or creating workarounds to solve business problems, including loss of functionality, productivity, and credibility.

    • Start with use cases to drive the initial discussion, then determine which features are mandatory and which are nice-to-haves. Mandatory features will help determine high success for critical functionality and identify where “good enough” is an acceptable state.
    • Consider the implications to implementation and all use cases of buying an all-in-one solution, integration of multiple best-of-breed solutions, or customizing features that were not built into a solution.
    • Be prepared to shelve a use case for this solution and look to alternatives for integration where mandatory features cannot meet highly specialized needs that are outside of traditional CRM solutions.

    Pros and Cons

    Build vs. Buy

    Multi-Source Best of Breed

    Flexibility
    vs.
    architectural complexity

    Vendor Add-Ons & Integrations

    Lower support costs
    vs.
    configuration

    Multi-source Custom

    Flexibility
    vs.
    high skills requirements

    Single Source

    Lower support costs
    vs.
    configuration

    2.5 Define use cases and high-level features for meeting business and technical goals

    1-2 hours

    Input: List of goals and challenges

    Output: Use cases to be used for determining requirements

    Materials: Whiteboard/flip charts, CRM Business Case Template

    Participants: CIO, Application managers, CMO/SVP sales, Marketing, sales, or service SMEs

    1. Identify the key customer engagement use cases that will support your overall goals as defined in the previous section.
    2. The following slide has examples of use case domains that will be enhanced from a CRM platform.
    3. Define high-level goals you wish to achieve in the first year and longer term. If you have more specific KPIs to add, and it is a requirement for your organization’s documentation, add them to this section.
    4. Take note of where processes will need to be improved to benefit from these use-case solutions – the tools are only as good as the process behind them.

    Download the CRM Business Case Template and document the outputs from this exercise in the current-state section of your business case.

    Understand the dominant use-case scenarios across organizations to narrow the list of potential CRM solutions

    Sales
    Enablement

    • Generate leads through multiple channels.
    • Rapidly sort, score, and prioritize leads based on multiple criteria.
    • Create in-depth sales forecasts segmented by multiple criteria (territory, representative, etc.).

    Marketing
    Management

    • Manage marketing campaigns across multiple channels (web, social, email, etc.).
    • Aggregate and analyze customer data to generate market intelligence.
    • Build and deploy customer-facing portals.

    Customer Service
    Management

    • Generate tickets, and triage customer service requests through multiple channels.
    • Track customer service interactions with cases.
    • There is a need to integrate customer records with contact center infrastructure.
    Info-Tech Insight

    Use your understanding of the CRM use case to accelerate the vendor shortlisting process. Since the CRM use case has a direct impact on the prioritization of a platform’s features and capabilities, you can rapidly eliminate vendors from contention or designate superfluous modules as out-of-scope.

    2.5.1 Use Info-Tech’s CRM Use-Case Fit Assessment Tool to align your CRM requirements to the vendor use cases

    30 min

    Input: Understanding of business objectives for CRM project, Use-Case Fit Assessment Tool

    Output: Use-case suitability

    Materials: Use-Case Fit Assessment Tool

    Participants: Core project team, Project managers

    1. Use the Use-Case Fit Assessment Tool to understand how your unique business requirements map into which CRM use case.
    2. This tool will assess your answers and determine your relative fit against the use-case scenarios.
    3. Fit will be assessed as “Weak,” “Moderate,” or “Strong.”
      1. Consider the common pitfalls, which were mentioned earlier, that can cause IT projects to fail. Plan and take clear steps to avoid or mitigate these concerns.
      2. Note: These use-case scenarios are not mutually exclusive, meaning your organization can align with one or more scenarios based on your answers. If your organization shows close alignment to multiple scenarios, consider focusing on finding a more robust solution and concentrate your review on vendors that performed strongly in those scenarios or meet the critical requirements for each.

    Download the CRM Use-Case Fit Assessment Tool

    Once you’ve identified the top-level use cases a CRM must support, elicit, and prioritize granular platform requirements.

    Understanding business needs through requirements gathering is the key to defining everything about what is being purchased, yet it is an area where people often make critical mistakes.

    Info-Tech Insight

    To avoid creating makeshift solutions, an organization needs to gather requirements with the desired future state in mind.

    Risks of poorly scoped requirements

    • Fail to be comprehensive and miss certain areas of scope
    • Focus on how the solution should work instead of what it must accomplish
    • Have multiple levels of detail within the requirements, which are inconsistent and confusing
    • Drill all the way down into system-level detail
    • Add unnecessary constraints based on what is done today rather than focusing on what is needed for tomorrow
    • Omit constraints or preferences that buyers think are “obvious”

    Best practices

    • Get a clear understanding of what the system needs to do and what it is expected to produce
    • Test against the principle of MECE – requirements should be “mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive”
    • Explicitly state the obvious and assume nothing
    • Investigate what is sold on the market and how it is sold. Use language that is consistent with that of the market and focus on key differentiators – not table stakes
    • Contain the appropriate level of detail – the level should be suitable for procurement and sufficient for differentiating vendors

    Prioritize requirements to assist with vendor selection: focus on priority requirements linked to differentiated capabilities

    Prioritization is the process of ranking each requirement based on its importance to project success. Hold a meeting for the domain SMEs, implementation SMEs, project managers, and project sponsors to prioritize the requirements list. At the conclusion of the meeting, each requirement should be assigned a priority level. The implementation SMEs will use these priority levels to ensure efforts are targeted toward the proper requirements and to plan features available on each release. Use the MoSCoW Model of Prioritization to effectively order requirements.


    Pyramid of the MoSCoW Model.
    The MoSCoW model was introduced by Dai Clegg of Oracle UK in 1994.

    The MoSCoW Model of Prioritization

    Requirements must be implemented for the solution to be considered successful.

    Requirements that are high priority should be included in the solution if possible.

    Requirements are desirable but not necessary and could be included if resources are available.

    Requirements won’t be in the next release, but will be considered for the future releases.

    Base your prioritization on the right set of criteria

    Effective Prioritization Criteria

    Criteria

    Description

    Regulatory & Legal Compliance These requirements will be considered mandatory.
    Policy Compliance Unless an internal policy can be altered or an exception can be made, these requirements will be considered mandatory.
    Business Value Significance Give a higher priority to high-value requirements.
    Business Risk Any requirement with the potential to jeopardize the entire project should be given a high priority and implemented early.
    Likelihood of Success Especially in “proof of concept” projects, it is recommended that requirements have good odds.
    Implementation Complexity Give a higher priority to low implementation difficulty requirements.
    Alignment With Strategy Give a higher priority to requirements that enable the corporate strategy.
    Urgency Prioritize requirements based on time sensitivity.
    Dependencies A requirement on its own may be low priority, but if it supports a high-priority requirement, then its priority must match it.

    2.6 Identify requirements to support your use cases

    1-2 hours

    Input: List of goals and challenges

    Output: Use cases to be used for determining requirements

    Materials: Whiteboard/flip charts, Vendor Evaluation Workbook

    Participants: CIO, Application managers, CMO/SVP sales, Marketing, sales, or service SMEs

    1. Work with the team to identify which features will be most important to support your use cases. Keep in mind there will be some features that will require more effort to implement fully. Add that into your project plan.
    2. Use the features lists on the following slides as a guide to get started on requirements.
    3. Prioritize your requirements list into mandatory features and nice-to-have features (or use the MoSCoW model from the previous slides). This will help you to eliminate vendors who don’t meet bare minimums and to score remaining vendors.
    4. Use this same list to guide your vendor demos.

    Our Improve Requirements Gathering blueprint provides a deep dive into the process of eliciting, analyzing, and validating requirements if you need to go deeper into effective techniques.

    CRM features

    Table stakes vs. differentiating

    What is a table stakes/standard feature?

    • Certain features are standard for all CRM tools, but that doesn’t mean they are all equal.
    • The existence of features doesn’t guarantee their quality or functionality to the standards you need. Never assume that “Yes” in a features list means you don’t need to ask for a demo.
    • If Table Stakes are all you need from your CRM solution, the only true differentiator for the organization is price. Otherwise, dig deeper to find the best price to value for your needs.

    What is a differentiating/additional feature?

    • Differentiating features take two forms:
      • Some CRM platforms offer differentiating features that are vertical specific.
      • Other CRM platforms offer differentiating features that are considered cutting edge. These cutting-edge features may become table stakes over time.

    Table stakes features for CRM

    Account Management Flexible account database that stores customer information, account history, and billing information. Additional functionality includes: contact deduplication, advanced field management, document linking, and embedded maps.
    Interaction Logging and Order History Ability to view all interactions that have occurred between sales teams and the customer, including purchase order history.
    Basic Pipeline Management View of all opportunities organized by their current stage in the sales process.
    Basic Case Management The ability to create and manage cases (for customer service or order fulfilment) and associate them with designated accounts or contacts.
    Basic Campaign Management Basic multi-channel campaign management (i.e. ability to execute outbound email campaigns). Budget tracking and campaign dashboards.
    Reports and Analytics In-depth reports on CRM data with dashboards and analytics for a variety of audiences.
    Mobile Support Mobile access across multiple devices (tablets, smartphones and/or wearables) with access to CRM data and dashboards.

    Additional features for CRM

    Customer Information Management Customizable records with detailed demographic information and the ability to created nested accounts (accounts with associated sub-accounts or contact records).
    Advanced Case Management Ability to track detailed interactions with members or constituents through a case view.
    Employee Collaboration Capabilities for employee-to-employee collaboration, team selling, and activity streams.
    Customer Collaboration Capabilities for outbound customer collaboration (i.e. the ability to create customer portals).
    Lead Generation Capabilities for generating qualified leads from multiple channels.
    Lead Nurturing/Lead Scoring The ability to evaluate lead warmth using multiple customer-defined criteria.
    Pipeline and Deal Management Managing deals through cases, providing quotes, and tracking client deliverables.

    Additional features for CRM (Continued)

    Marketing Campaign Management Managing outbound marketing campaigns via multiple channels (email, phone, social, mobile).
    Customer Intelligence Tools for in-depth customer insight generation and segmentation, predictive analytics, and contextual analytics.
    Multi-Channel Support Capabilities for supporting customer interactions across multiple channels (email, phone, social, mobile, IoT, etc.).
    Customer Service Workflow Management Capabilities for customer service resolution, including ticketing and service management.
    Knowledge Management Tools for capturing and sharing CRM-related knowledge, especially for customer service.
    Customer Journey Mapping Visual workflow builder with automated trigger points and business rules engine.
    Document Management The ability to curate assets and attachments and add them to account or contact records.
    Configure, Price, Quote The ability to create sales quotes/proposals from predefined price lists and rules.

    2.7 Put it all together – port your requirements into a robust RFP template that you can take to market!

    1-2 hours
    1. Once you’ve captured and prioritized your requirements – and received sign-off on them from key stakeholders – it’s time to bake them into a procurement vehicle of your choice.
    2. For complex enterprise systems like a CRM platform, Info-Tech recommends that this should take the form of a structured RFP document.
    3. Use our CRM RFP Template and associated CRM RFP Scoring Tool to jump-start the process.
    4. The next step will be conducting a market scan to identify contenders, and issuing the RFP to a shortlist of viable vendors for further evaluation.

    Need additional guidance on running an effective RFP process? Our Drive Successful Sourcing Outcomes with a Robust RFP Process has everything you need to ace the creation, administration and assessment of RFPs!

    Samples of the CRM Request for Proposal Template and CRM Suite Evaluation and RFP Scoring Tool.

    Download the CRM Request for Proposal Template

    Download the CRM Suite Evaluation and RFP Scoring Tool

    Identify whether vertical-specific CRM platforms are a best fit

    In mature vendor landscapes (like CRM) vendors begin to differentiate themselves by offering vertical-specific platforms, modules, or feature sets. These feature sets accelerate the implantation, decrease the platform’s learning curve, and drive user adoption. The three use cases below cover the most common industry-specific offerings:

    Public Sector

    • Constituent management and communication.
    • Constituent portal deployment for self-service.
    • Segment constituents based on geography, needs and preferences.

    Education

    • Top-level view into the student journey from prospect to enrolment.
    • Track student interactions with services across the institution.
    • Unify communications across different departments.

    Financial Services

    • Determine customer proclivity for new services.
    • Develop self-service banking portals.
    • Track longitudinal customer relationships from first account to retirement management.
    Info-Tech Insight

    Vertical-specific solutions require less legwork to do upfront but could cost you more in the long run. Interoperability and vendor viability must be carefully examined. Smaller players targeting niche industries often have limited integration ecosystems and less funding to keep pace with feature innovation.

    Rein-in ballooning scope for CRM selection projects

    Stretching the CRM beyond its core capabilities is a short-term solution to a long-term problem. Educate stakeholders about the limits of CRM technology.

    Common pitfalls for CRM selection

    • Tangential capabilities may require separate solutions. It is common for stakeholders to list features such as “content management” as part of the new CRM platform. While content management goes hand in hand with the CRM’s ability to manage customer interactions, document management is best handled by a standalone platform.

    Keeping stakeholders engaged and in line

    • Ballooning scope leads to stakeholder dissatisfaction. Appeasing stakeholders by over-customizing the platform will lead to integration and headaches down the road.
    • Make sure stakeholders feel heard. Do not turn down ideas in the midst of an elicitation session. Once the requirements-gathering sessions are completed, the project team has the opportunity to mark requirements as “out of scope” and communicate the reasoning behind the decision.
    • Educate stakeholders on the core functionality of CRM. Many stakeholders do not know the best-fit use cases for CRM platforms. Help end users understand what CRM is good at and where additional technologies will be needed.
    Stock image of a man leaping with a balloon.

    CRM Buyer’s Guide

    Phase 3

    Discover the CRM Market Space & Prepare for Implementation

    Phase 1

    1.1 Define CRM platforms

    1.2 Classify table stakes & differentiating capabilities

    1.3 Explore CRM trends

    Phase 2

    2.1 Build the business case

    2.2 Streamline requirements elicitation for CRM

    2.3 Construct the RFP

    Phase 3

    3.1 Discover key players in the CRM landscape

    3.2 Engage the shortlist & select finalist

    3.3 Prepare for implementation

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Dive into the key players of the CRM vendor landscape.
    • Understand best practices for building a vendor shortlist.
    • Understand key implementation considerations for CRM.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • Applications manager
    • Project manager
    • Sales executive
    • Marketing executive
    • Customer service executive

    Consolidating the Vendor Shortlist Up-Front Reduces Downstream Effort

    Put the “short” back in shortlist!

    • Radically reduce effort by narrowing the field of potential vendors earlier in the selection process. Too many organizations don’t funnel their vendor shortlist until nearing the end of the selection process. The result is wasted time and effort evaluating options that are patently not a good fit.
    • Leverage external data (such as SoftwareReviews) and expert opinion to consolidate your shortlist into a smaller number of viable vendors before the investigative interview stage and eliminate time spent evaluating dozens of RFP responses.
    • Having fewer RFP responses to evaluate means you will have more time to do greater due diligence.
    Stock image of river rapids.

    Review your use cases to start your shortlist

    Your Info-Tech analysts can help you narrow down the list of vendors that will meet your requirements.

    Next steps will include:
    1. Reviewing your requirements
    2. Checking out SoftwareReviews
    3. Shortlisting your vendors
    4. Conducting demos and detailed proposal reviews
    5. Selecting and contracting with a finalist!
    Image of a person presenting a dashboard of the steps on the left.

    Get to know the key players in the CRM landscape

    The proceeding slides provide a top-level overview of the popular players you will encounter in the CRM shortlisting process.

    Logos of the key players in the CRM landscape (Salesforce, Microsoft, Oracle, HubSpot, etc).

    Evaluate software category leaders through vendor rankings and awards

    SoftwareReviews

    Sample of SoftwareReviews' Data Quadrant Report. Title page of SoftwareReviews' Data Quadrant Report. The Data Quadrant is a thorough evaluation and ranking of all software in an individual category to compare platforms across multiple dimensions.

    Vendors are ranked by their Composite Score, based on individual feature evaluations, user satisfaction rankings, vendor capability comparisons, and likeliness to recommend the platform.

    Sample of SoftwareReviews' Emotional Footprint. Title page of SoftwareReviews' Emotional Footprint. The Emotional Footprint is a powerful indicator of overall user sentiment toward the relationship with the vendor, capturing data across five dimensions.

    Vendors are ranked by their Customer Experience (CX) Score, which combines the overall Emotional Footprint rating with a measure of the value delivered by the solution.

    Speak with category experts to dive deeper into the vendor landscape

    SoftwareReviews

    Icon of a person.


    Fact-based reviews of business software from IT professionals.

    Icon of a magnifying glass over a chart.


    Top-tier data quality backed by a rigorous quality assurance process.

    CLICK HERE to ACCESS

    Comprehensive software reviews to make better IT decisions

    We collect and analyze the most detailed reviews on enterprise software from real users to give you an unprecedented view into the product and vendor before you buy.

    Icon of a tablet.


    Product and category reports with state-of-the-art data visualization.

    Icon of a phone.


    User-experience insight that reveals the intangibles of working with a vendor.

    SoftwareReviews is powered by Info-Tech

    Technology coverage is a priority for Info-Tech, and SoftwareReviews provides the most comprehensive unbiased data on today’s technology. Combined with the insights of our expert analysts, our members receive unparalleled support in their buying journey.

    Logo for Salesforce.
    Est. 1999 | CA, USA | NYSE: CRM

    bio

    Link for their Twitter account. Link for their LinkedIn profile. Link for their website.
    Sales Cloud Enterprise allows you to be more efficient, more productive, more everything than ever before as it allows you to close more deals, accelerate productivity, get more leads, and make more insightful decisions.

    SoftwareReviews’ Enterprise CRM Rankings

    Strengths:
    • Breadth of features
    • Quality of features
    • Sales management functionality
    Areas to Improve:
    • Cost of service
    • Ease of implementation
    • Telephony and contact center management
    Logo gif for SoftwareReviews.
    8.0
    COMPOSITE SCORE
    8.3
    CX SCORE
    +77
    EMOTIONAL FOOTPRINT
    83%
    LIKELINESS TO RECOMMEND
    DOWNLOAD REPORT 600
    REVIEWS
    Vendor scores are driven by real-world practitioner reviews via SoftwareReviews. Composite, CX, EF and NPS scores pulled from live data as of June 2022. Rankings and ”strengths” and ”areas to improve” pulled from January 2022 Category Report.
    Sample of a Salesforce screen. Vendor Pulse rating. How often do we hear about Salesforce from our members for CRM? 'Very Frequently'.
    History of Salesforce in a vertical timeline.
    *Pricing correct as of August 2021. Listed in USD and absent discounts.
    See pricing on vendor’s website for latest information.
    Logo for Salesforce.

    “Salesforce is the pre-eminent vendor in the CRM marketplace and is a force to be reckoned with in terms of the breadth and depth of its capabilities. The company was an early disruptor in the category, placing a strong emphasis from the get-go on a SaaS delivery model and strong end-user experience. This allowed them to rapidly gain market share at the expense of more complacent enterprise application vendors. A series of savvy acquisitions over the years has allowed Salesforce to augment their core Sales and Service Clouds with a wide variety of other solutions, from e-commerce to marketing automation to CPQ. Salesforce is a great fit for any organization looking to partner with a market leader with excellent functional breadth, strong interoperability, and a compelling technology and partner ecosystem. All of this comes at a price, however – Salesforce prices at a premium, and our members routinely opine that Salesforce’s commercial teams are overly aggressive – sometimes pushing solutions without a clear link to underpinning business requirements.”

    Ben Dickie
    Research Practice Lead, Info-Tech Research Group

    Sales Cloud Essentials Sales Cloud Professional Sales Cloud Enterprise Sales Cloud Ultimate
    • Starts at $25*
    • Per user/mo
    • Small businesses after basic functionality
    • Starts at $75*
    • Per user/mo
    • Mid-market target
    • Starts at $150*
    • Per user/mo
    • Enterprise target
    • Starts at $300*
    • Per user/mo
    • Strong upmarket feature additions
    Logo for Microsoft.


    Est. 1975 | WA, USA | NYSE: MSFT

    bio

    Link for their Twitter account.Link for their LinkedIn profile.Link for their website.
    Dynamics 365 Sales is an adaptive selling solution that helps your sales team navigate the realities of modern selling. At the center of the solution is an adaptive, intelligent system – prebuilt and ready to go – that actively monitors myriad signals and distills them into actionable insights.

    SoftwareReviews’ Enterprise CRM Rankings

    Strengths:

    • Business value created
    • Analytics and reporting
    • Lead management

    Areas to Improve:

    • Quote, contract, and proposals
    • Vendor support
    Logo gif for SoftwareReviews.
    8.1
    COMPOSITE SCORE
    8.3
    CX SCORE
    +84
    EMOTIONAL FOOTPRINT
    82%
    LIKELINESS TO RECOMMEND
    DOWNLOAD REPORT 198
    REVIEWS
    Vendor scores are driven by real-world practitioner reviews via SoftwareReviews. Composite, CX, EF and NPS scores pulled from live data as of June 2022. Rankings and ”strengths” and ”areas to improve” pulled from January 2022 Category Report.
    Sample of a Microsoft screen.Vendor Pulse rating. How often do we hear about Microsoft Dynamics from our Members? 'Very Frequently'.

    History of Microsoft in a vertical timeline.

    *Pricing correct as of June 2022. Listed in USD and absent discounts.
    See pricing on vendor’s website for latest information.
    Logo for Microsoft.
    “”

    “Microsoft Dynamics 365 is a strong and compelling player in the CRM arena. While Microsoft is no stranger to the CRM space, their offerings here have seen steady and marked improvement over the last five years. Good functional breadth paired with a modern user interface and best-in-class Microsoft stack compatibility ensures that we consistently see them on our members’ shortlists, particularly when our members are looking to roll out CRM capabilities alongside other components of the Dynamics ecosystem (such as Finance, Operations, and HR). Today, Microsoft segments the offering into discrete modules for sales, service, marketing, commerce, and CDP. While Microsoft Dynamics 365 is a strong option, it’s occasionally mired by concerns that the pace of innovation and investment lags Salesforce (its nearest competitor). Additionally, the marketing module of the product is softer than some of its competitors, and Microsoft themselves points organizations with complex marketing requirements to a strategic partnership that they have with Adobe.”

    Ben Dickie
    Research Practice Lead, Info-Tech Research Group

    D365 Sales Professional D365 Sales Enterprise D365 Sales Premium
    • Starts at $65*
    • Per user/mo
    • Midmarket focus
    • Starts at $95*
    • Per user/mo
    • Enterprise focus
    • Starts at $135*
    • Per user/mo
    • Enterprise focus with customer intelligence
    Logo for Oracle.


    Est. 1977 | CA, USA | NYSE: ORCL

    bio

    Link for their Twitter account.Link for their LinkedIn profile.Link for their website.
    Oracle Engagement Cloud (CX Sales) provides a set of capabilities to help sales leaders transition smoothly from sales planning and execution through customer onboarding, account management, and support services.

    SoftwareReviews’ Enterprise CRM Rankings

    Strengths:

    • Quality of features
    • Activity and workflow management
    • Analytics and reporting

    Areas to Improve:

    • Marketing management
    • Product strategy & rate of improvement
    Logo gif for SoftwareReviews.
    7.8
    COMPOSITE SCORE
    7.9
    CX SCORE
    +77
    EMOTIONAL FOOTPRINT
    78%
    LIKELINESS TO RECOMMEND
    DOWNLOAD REPORT 140
    REVIEWS
    Vendor scores are driven by real-world practitioner reviews via SoftwareReviews. Composite, CX, EF and NPS scores pulled from live data as of June 2022. Rankings and ”strengths” and ”areas to improve” pulled from January 2022 Category Report.
    Sample of an Oracle screen.Vendor Pulse rating. How often do we hear about Oracle from our members for CRM? 'Frequently'.

    History of Oracle in a vertical timeline.

    Logo for Oracle.

    “Oracle is long-term juggernaut of the enterprise applications space. Their CRM portfolio is diverse – rather than a single stack, there are multiple Oracle solutions (many made by acquisition) that support CRM capabilities – everything from Siebel to JD Edwards to NetSuite to Oracle CX applications. The latter constitute Oracle’s most modern stab at CRM and are where the bulk of feature innovation and product development is occurring within their portfolio. While historically seen as lagging behind other competitors like Salesforce and Microsoft, Oracle has made excellent strides in improving their user experience (via their Redwoods design paradigm) and building new functional capabilities within their CRM products. Indeed, SoftwareReviews shows Oracle performing well in our most recent peer-driven reports. Nonetheless, we most commonly see Oracle as a pricier ecosystem play that’s often subordinate to a heavy Oracle footprint for ERP. Many of our members also express displeasure with Oracle as a vendor and highlight their heavy-handed “threat of audit” approach. ”

    Ben Dickie
    Research Practice Lead, Info-Tech Research Group

    Oracle CX Sales - Pricing Opaque:

    “Request a Demo”

    Logo for SAP.


    Est. 1972 | Germany | NYSE: SAP

    bio

    Link for their Twitter account.Link for their LinkedIn profile.Link for their website.
    SAP is the third-largest independent software manufacturer in the world, with a presence in over 120 countries. Having been in the industry for over 40 years, SAP is perhaps best known for its ERP application, SAP ERP.

    SoftwareReviews’ Enterprise CRM Rankings

    Strengths:

    • Ease of data integration

    Areas to Improve:

    • Lead management
    • Marketing management
    • Collaboration
    • Usability & intuitiveness
    • Analytics & reporting
    Logo gif for SoftwareReviews.
    7.4
    COMPOSITE SCORE
    7.8
    CX SCORE
    +74
    EMOTIONAL FOOTPRINT
    75%
    LIKELINESS TO RECOMMEND
    DOWNLOAD REPORT 108
    REVIEWS
    Vendor scores are driven by real-world practitioner reviews via SoftwareReviews. Composite, CX, EF and NPS scores pulled from live data as of June 2022. Rankings and ”strengths” and ”areas to improve” pulled from January 2022 Category Report.
    Sample of a SAP screen.Vendor Pulse rating. How often do we hear about SAP from our members for CRM? 'Occasionally'.

    History of SAP in a vertical timeline.

    *Pricing correct as of August 2021. Listed in USD and absent discounts.
    See pricing on vendor’s website for latest information.
    Logo for SAP.

    “SAP is another mainstay of the enterprise applications market. While they have a sound breadth of capabilities in the CRM and customer experience space, SAP consistently underperforms in many of our relevant peer-driven SoftwareReviews reports for CRM and adjacent areas. CRM seems decidedly a secondary focus for SAP, behind their more compelling play in the enterprise resource planning (ERP) space. Indeed, most instances where we see SAP in our clients’ shortlists, it’s as an ecosystem play within a broader SAP strategy. If you’re blue on the ERP side, looking to SAP’s capabilities on the CRM front makes logical sense and can help contain costs. If you’re approaching a CRM selection from a greenfield lens and with no legacy vendor baggage for SAP elsewhere, experience suggests you’ll be better served by a vendor that places a higher degree of primacy on the CRM aspect of their portfolio.”

    Ben Dickie
    Research Practice Lead, Info-Tech Research Group

    SAP CRM - Pricing Opaque:

    “Request a Demo”

    Logo for pipedrive.


    Est. 2010 | NY, USA | Private

    bio

    Link for their Twitter account.Link for their LinkedIn profile.Link for their website.
    Pipedrive brings together the tools and data, the platform focuses sales professionals on fundamentals to advance deals through their pipelines. Pipedrive's goal is to make sales success inevitable - for salespeople and teams.

    SoftwareReviews’ Enterprise CRM Rankings

    Strengths:

    • Sales Management
    • Account & Contact Management
    • Lead Management
    • Usability & Intuitiveness
    • Ease of Implementation

    Areas to Improve:

    • Customer Service Management
    • Marketing Management
    • Product Strategy & Rate of Improvement
    Logo gif for SoftwareReviews.
    8.3
    COMPOSITE SCORE
    8.4
    CX SCORE
    +85
    EMOTIONAL FOOTPRINT
    85%
    LIKELINESS TO RECOMMEND
    DOWNLOAD REPORT 262
    REVIEWS
    Vendor scores are driven by real-world practitioner reviews via SoftwareReviews. Composite, CX, EF and NPS scores pulled from live data as of June 2022. Rankings and ”strengths” and ”areas to improve” pulled from January 2022 Category Report.
    Sample of a Pipedrive screen.Vendor Pulse rating. How often do we hear about Pipedrive from our members for CRM? 'Occasionally'.

    History of Pipedrive in a vertical timeline.

    *Pricing correct as of June 2022. Listed in USD and absent discounts.
    See pricing on vendor’s website for latest information.
    Logo for Pipedrive.

    “A relatively new offering, Pipedrive has seen explosive growth over the last five years. They’re a vendor that has gone from near-obscurity to popping up frequently on our members’ shortlists. Pipedrive’s secret sauce has been a relentless focus on high-velocity sales enablement. Their focus on pipeline management, lead assessment and routing, and a good single pane of glass for sales reps has driven significant traction for the vendor when sales enablement is the driving rationale behind rolling out a new CRM platform. Bang for your buck is also strong with Pipedrive, with the vendor having a value-driven licensing and implementation model.

    Pipedrive is not without some shortcomings. It’s laser-focus on sales enablement is at the expense of deep capabilities for marketing and service management, and its profile lends itself better to SMBs and lower midmarket than it does large organizations looking for enterprise-grade CRM.”

    Ben Dickie
    Research Practice Lead, Info-Tech Research Group

    Essential Advanced Professional Enterprise
    • Starts at $12.50*
    • Per user/mo
    • Small businesses after basic functionality
    • Starts at $24.90*
    • Per user/mo
    • Small/mid-sized businesses
    • Starts at $49.90*
    • Per user/mo
    • Lower mid-market focus
    • Starts at $99*
    • Per user/mo
    • Enterprise focus
    Logo for SugarCRM.


    Est. 2004 | CA, USA | Private

    bio

    Link for their Twitter account.Link for their LinkedIn profile.Link for their website.
    Produces Sugar, a SaaS-based customer relationship management application. SugarCRM is backed by Accel-KKR.

    SoftwareReviews’ Enterprise CRM Rankings

    Strengths:

    • Ease of customization
    • Product strategy and rate of improvement
    • Ease of IT administration

    Areas to Improve:

    • Marketing management
    • Analytics and reporting
    Logo gif for SoftwareReviews.
    8.4
    COMPOSITE SCORE
    8.8
    CX SCORE
    +92
    EMOTIONAL FOOTPRINT
    84%
    LIKELINESS TO RECOMMEND
    DOWNLOAD REPORT 97
    REVIEWS
    Vendor scores are driven by real-world practitioner reviews via SoftwareReviews. Composite, CX, EF and NPS scores pulled from live data as of June 2022. Rankings and ”strengths” and ”areas to improve” pulled from January 2022 Category Report.
    Sample of a SugarCRM screen.Vendor Pulse rating. How often do we hear about SugarCRM from our members for CRM? 'Frequently'.
    History of SugarCRM in a vertical timeline.
    *Pricing correct as of August 2021. Listed in USD and absent discounts.
    See pricing on vendor’s website for latest information.
    Logo for SugarCRM.

    “SugarCRM offers reliable baseline capabilities at a lower price point than other large CRM vendors. While SugarCRM does not offer all the bells and whistles that an Enterprise Salesforce plan might, SugarCRM is known for providing excellent vendor support. If your organization is only after standard features, SugarCRM will be a good vendor to shortlist.

    However, ensure you have the time and labor power to effectively implement and train on SugarCRM’s solutions. SugarCRM does not score highly for user-friendly experiences, with complaints centering on outdated and unintuitive interfaces. Setting up customized modules takes time to navigate, and SugarCRM does not provide a wide range of native integrations with other applications. To effectively determine whether SugarCRM does offer a feasible solution, it is recommended that organizations know exactly what kinds of integrations and modules they need.”

    Thomas Randall
    Research Director, Info-Tech Research Group

    Sugar Professional Sugar Serve Sugar Sell Sugar Enterprise Sugar Market
    • Starts at $52*
    • Per user/mo
    • Min. 3 users
    • Small businesses
    • Starts at $80*
    • Per user/mo
    • Min. 3 users
    • Focused on customer service
    • Starts at $80*
    • Per user/mo
    • Min. 3 users
    • Focused on sales automation
    • Starts at $80*
    • Per user/mo
    • Min. 3 users
    • On-premises, mid-sized businesses
    • Starts at $1000*
    • Priced per month
    • Min. 10k contacts
    • Large enterprise
    Logo for .


    Est. 2006 | MA, USA | HUBS (NYSE)

    bio

    Link for their Twitter account.Link for their LinkedIn profile.Link for their website.
    Develops software for inbound customer service, marketing, and sales. Software includes CRM, SMM, lead gen, SEO, and web analytics.

    SoftwareReviews’ Enterprise CRM Rankings

    Strengths:

    • Breadth of features
    • Product strategy and rate of improvement
    • Ease of customization

    Areas to Improve:

    • Ease of data integration
    • Customer service management
    • Telephony and call center management
    Logo gif for SoftwareReviews.
    8.3
    COMPOSITE SCORE
    8.4
    CX SCORE
    +84
    EMOTIONAL FOOTPRINT
    86%
    LIKELINESS TO RECOMMEND
    DOWNLOAD REPORT 97
    REVIEWS
    Vendor scores are driven by real-world practitioner reviews via SoftwareReviews. Composite, CX, EF and NPS scores pulled from live data as of June 2022. Rankings and ”strengths” and ”areas to improve” pulled from January 2022 Category Report.
    Sample of a HubSpot screen.Vendor Pulse rating. How often do we hear about HubSpot from our members for CRM? 'Frequently'.

    History of HubSpot in a vertical timeline.

    *Pricing correct as of August 2021. Listed in USD and absent discounts
    See pricing on vendor’s website for latest information.
    Logo for HubSpot.

    “ HubSpot is best suited for small to mid-sized organizations that need a range of CRM tools to enable growth across sales, marketing campaigns, and customer service. Indeed, HubSpot offers a content management solution that offers a central storage location for all customer and marketing data. Moreover, HubSpot offers plenty of freemium tools for users to familiarize themselves with the software before buying. However, though HubSpot is geared toward growing businesses, smaller organizations may not see high ROI until they begin to scale. The “Starter” and “Professional” plans’ pricing is often cited by small organizations as a barrier to commitment, and the freemium tools are not a sustainable solution. If organizations can take advantage of discount behaviors from HubSpot (e.g. a startup discount), HubSpot will be a viable long-term solution. ”

    Thomas Randall
    Research Director, Info-Tech Research Group

    Starter Professional Enterprise
    • Starts at $50*
    • Per month
    • Min. 2 users
    • Small businesses
    • Starts at $500*
    • Per month
    • Min. 5 users
    • Small/mid-sized businesses
    • Starts at $1200*
    • Billed yearly
    • Min. 10 users
    • Mid-sized/small enterprise
    Logo for Zoho.


    Est. 1996 | India | Private

    bio

    Link for their Twitter account.Link for their LinkedIn profile.Link for their website.
    Zoho Corporation offers a cloud software suite, providing a full operating system for CRM, alongside apps for finance, productivity, HR, legal, and more.

    SoftwareReviews’ Enterprise CRM Rankings

    Strengths:

    • Business value created
    • Breadth of features
    • Collaboration capabilities

    Areas to Improve:

    • Usability and intuitiveness
    Logo gif for SoftwareReviews.
    8.7
    COMPOSITE SCORE
    8.9
    CX SCORE
    +92
    EMOTIONAL FOOTPRINT
    85%
    LIKELINESS TO RECOMMEND
    DOWNLOAD REPORT 152
    REVIEWS
    Vendor scores are driven by real-world practitioner reviews via SoftwareReviews. Composite, CX, EF and NPS scores pulled from live data as of June 2022. Rankings and ”strengths” and ”areas to improve” pulled from January 2022 Category Report.
    Sample of a Zoho screen.Vendor Pulse rating. How often do we hear about Zoho from our members for CRM? 'Occasionally'.

    History of Zoho in a vertical timeline.

    *
    See pricing on vendor’s website for latest information.
    Logo for Zoho.

    “Zoho has a long list of software solutions for businesses to run end to end. As one of Zoho’s earliest software releases, though, ZohoCRM remains a flagship product. ZohoCRM’s pricing is incredibly competitive for mid/large enterprises, offering high business value for its robust feature sets. For those organizations that already utilize Zoho solutions (such as its productivity suite), ZohoCRM will be a natural extension.

    However, small/mid-sized businesses may wonder how much ROI they can get from ZohoCRM, when much of the functionality expected from a CRM (such as workflow automation) cannot be found until one jumps to the “Enterprise” plan. Given the “Enterprise” plan’s pricing is on par with other CRM vendors, there may not be much in a smaller organization’s eyes that truly distinguishes ZohoCRM unless they are already invested Zoho users.”

    Thomas Randall
    Research Director, Info-Tech Research Group

    Standard Professional Enterprise Ultimate
    • Starts at $20*
    • Per user/mo
    • Small businesses after basic functionality
    • Starts at $35*
    • Per user/mo
    • Small/mid-sized businesses
    • Adds inventory management
    • Starts at $50*
    • Per user/mo
    • Mid-sized/small enterprise
    • Adds Zia AI
    • Starts at $65*
    • Per user/mo
    • Enterprise
    • Bundles Zoho Analytics
    Logo for Zendesk.


    Est. 2009 | CA, USA | ZEN (NYSE)

    bio

    Link for their Twitter account.Link for their LinkedIn profile.Link for their website.
    Software developer for customer service. Founded in Copenhagen but moved to San Francisco after $6 million Series B funding from Charles River Ventures and Benchmark Capital.

    SoftwareReviews’ Enterprise CRM Rankings

    Strengths:

    • Quality of features
    • Breadth of features
    • Vendor support

    Areas to Improve:

    • Business value created
    • Ease of customization
    • Usability and intuitiveness
    Logo gif for SoftwareReviews.
    7.8
    COMPOSITE SCORE
    7.9
    CX SCORE
    +80
    EMOTIONAL FOOTPRINT
    72%
    LIKELINESS TO RECOMMEND
    DOWNLOAD REPORT 50
    REVIEWS
    Vendor scores are driven by real-world practitioner reviews via SoftwareReviews. Composite, CX, EF and NPS scores pulled from live data as of June 2022. Rankings and ”strengths” and ”areas to improve” pulled from January 2022 Category Report.
    Sample of a Zendesk screen.Vendor Pulse rating. How often do we hear about Zendesk from our members for CRM? 'Rarely'.

    History of Zendesk in a vertical timeline.

    *Pricing correct as of August 2021. Listed in USD and absent discounts
    See pricing on vendor’s website for latest information.
    Logo for Zendesk.

    “Zendesk’s initial growth was grounded in word-of-mouth advertising, owing to the popularity of its help desk solution’s design and functionality. Zendesk Sell has followed suit, receiving strong feedback for the breadth and quality of its features. Organizations that have already reaped the benefits of Zendesk’s customer service suite will find Zendesk Sell a straightforward fit for their sales teams.

    However, it is important to note that Zendesk Sell is predominantly focused on sales. Other key components of a CRM, such as marketing, are less fleshed out. Organizations should ensure they verify what requirements they have for a CRM before choosing Zendesk Sell – if sales process requirements (such as forecasting, call analytics, and so on) are but one part of what the organization needs, Zendesk Sell may not offer the highest ROI for the pricing offered.”

    Thomas Randall
    Research Director, Info-Tech Research Group

    Sell Team Sell Professional Sell Enterprise
    • Starts at $19*
    • Per user/mo
    • Max. 3 users
    • Small businesses
    • Basic functionality
    • Starts at $49*
    • Per user/mo
    • Small/mid-sized businesses
    • Advanced analytics
    • Starts at $99*
    • Per user/mo
    • Mid-sized/small enterprise
    • Task automation

    Speak with category experts to dive deeper into the vendor landscape

    Icon of a person.
    Fact-based reviews of business software from IT professionals.
    Icon of a magnifying glass over a chart.
    Top-tier data quality backed by a rigorous quality assurance process.
    CLICK HERE to ACCESS

    Comprehensive software reviews to make better IT decisions

    We collect and analyze the most detailed reviews on enterprise software from real users to give you an unprecedented view into the product and vendor before you buy.

    Icon of a tablet.
    Product and category reports with state-of-the-art data visualization.
    Icon of a phone.
    User-experience insight that reveals the intangibles of working with a vendor.

    SoftwareReviews is powered by Info-Tech

    Technology coverage is a priority for Info-Tech, and SoftwareReviews provides the most comprehensive unbiased data on today’s technology. Combined with the insights of our expert analysts, our members receive unparalleled support in their buying journey.

    Conduct a day of rapid-fire vendor demos

    Zoom in on high-value use cases and answers to targeted questions

    Make sure the solution will work for your business

    Give each vendor 90 to 120 minutes to give a rapid-fire presentation. We suggest the following structure:

    • 30 minutes: company introduction and vision
    • 60 minutes: walk-through of two or three high-value demo scenarios
    • 30 minutes: targeted Q&A from the business stakeholders and procurement team
    To ensure a consistent evaluation, vendors should be asked analogous questions, and a tabulation of answers should be conducted.
    How to challenge the vendors in the investigative interview
    • Change the visualization/presentation.
    • Change the underlying data.
    • Add additional data sets to the artifacts.
    • Collaboration capabilities.
    • Perform an investigation in terms of finding BI objects and identifying previous changes, and examine the audit trail.
    Rapid-fire vendor investigative interview

    Invite vendors to come onsite (or join you via video conference) to demonstrate the product and to answer questions. Use a highly targeted demo script to help identify how a vendor’s solution will fit your organization’s particular business capability needs.

    Graphic of an alarm clock.
    To kick-start scripting your demo scenarios, leverage our CRM Demo Script Template.

    A vendor scoring model provides a clear anchor point for your evaluation of CRM vendors based on a variety of inputs

    A vendor scoring model is a systematic method for effectively assessing competing vendors. A weighted-average scoring model is an approach that strikes a strong balance between rigor and evaluation speed.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Even the best scoring model will still involve some “art” rather than science – scoring categories such as vendor viability always entails a degree of subjective interpretation.

    How do I build a scoring model?

    • Start by shortlisting the key criteria you will use to evaluate your vendors. Functional capabilities should always be a critical category, but you’ll also want to look at criteria such as affordability, architectural fit, and vendor viability.
    • Depending on the complexity of the project, you may break down some criteria into sub-categories to assist with evaluation (for example, breaking down functional capabilities into constituent use cases so you can score each one).
    • Once you’ve developed the key criteria for your project, the next step is weighting each criterion. Your weightings should reflect the priorities for the project at hand. For example, some projects may put more emphasis on affordability, others on vendor partnership.
    • Using the information collected in the subsequent phases of this blueprint, score each criterion from 1-100, then multiply by the weighting factor. Add up the weighted scores to arrive at the aggregate evaluation score for each vendor on your shortlist.

    What are some of the best practices?

    • While the criteria for each project may vary, it’s helpful to have an inventory of repeatable criteria that can be used across application selection projects. The next slide contains an example that you can add or subtract from.
    • Don’t go overboard on the number of criteria: five to 10 weighted criteria should be the norm for most projects. The more criteria (and sub-criteria) you must score against, the longer it will take to conduct your evaluation. Always remember, link the level of rigor to the size and complexity of your project! It’s possible to create a convoluted scoring model that takes significant time to fill out but yields little additional value.
    • Creation of the scoring model should be a consensus-driven activity among IT, procurement, and the key business stakeholders – it should not be built in isolation. Everyone should agree on the fundamental criteria and weights that are employed.
    • Consider using not just the outputs of investigative interviews and RFP responses to score vendors, but also third-party review services like SoftwareReviews.

    Define how you’ll score CRM proposals and demos

    Define key CRM selection criteria for your organization – this should be informed by the following goals, use cases, and requirements covered in the blueprint.

    Criteria

    Description

    Functional CapabilitiesHow well does the vendor align with the top-priority functional requirements identified in your accelerated needs assessment? What is the vendor’s functional breadth and depth?
    AffordabilityHow affordable is this vendor? Consider a three-to-five-year total cost of ownership (TCO) that encompasses not just licensing costs, but also implementation, integration, training, and ongoing support costs.
    Architectural FitHow well does this vendor align with our direction from an enterprise architecture perspective? How interoperable is the solution with existing applications in our technology stack? Does the solution meet our deployment model preferences?
    ExtensibilityHow easy is it to augment the base solution with native or third-party add-ons as our business needs may evolve?
    ScalabilityHow easy is it to expand the solution to support increased user, data, and/or customer volumes? Are there any capacity constraints of the solution?
    Vendor ViabilityHow viable is this vendor? Are they an established player with a proven track record, or a new and untested entrant to the market? What is the financial health of the vendor? How committed are they to the particular solution category?
    Vendor VisionDoes the vendor have a cogent and realistic product roadmap? Are they making sensible investments that align with your organization’s internal direction?
    Emotional FootprintHow well does the vendor’s organizational culture and team dynamics align to yours?
    Third-Party Assessments and/or ReferencesHow well-received is the vendor by unbiased, third-party sources like SoftwareReviews? For larger projects, how well does the vendor perform in reference checks (and how closely do those references mirror your own situation)?

    Decision Point: Select the Finalist

    After reviewing all vendor responses to your RFP, conducting vendor demos, and running a pilot project (if applicable), the time has arrived to select your finalist.

    All core selection team members should hold a session to score each shortlisted vendor against the criteria enumerated on the previous slide – based on an in-depth review of proposals, the demo sessions, and any pilots or technical assessments.

    The vendor that scores the highest in aggregate is your finalist.

    Congratulations – you are now ready to proceed to final negotiation and inking a contract. This blueprint provides a detailed approach on the mechanics of a major vendor negotiation.

    Leverage Info-Tech’s research to plan and execute your CRM implementation

    Use Info-Tech Research Group’s three phase implementation process to guide your own planning.
    The three phases of software implementation: 'Assess', 'Prepare', 'Govern & Course Correct'. Sample of the 'Governance and Management of Enterprise Software Implementation' blueprint.

    Establish and execute an end-to-end, agile framework to succeed with the implementation of a major enterprise application.

    Visit this link

    Prepare for implementation: establish a clear resourcing plan

    Organizations rarely have sufficient internal staffing to resource a CRM project on their own. Consider the options for closing the gap in internal resource availability.

    The most common project resourcing structures for enterprise projects are:
    Your own staff +
    1. Management consultant
    2. Vendor consultant
    3. System integrator
    Info-Tech Insight

    When contemplating a resourcing structure, consider:

    • Availability of in-house implementation competencies and resources.
    • Timeline and constraints.
    • Integration environment complexity.

    Consider the following:

    Internal vs. External Roles and Responsibilities

    Clearly delineate between internal and external team responsibilities and accountabilities, and communicate this to your technology partner up front.

    Internal vs. External Accountabilities

    Accountability is different than responsibility. Your vendor or SI partner may be responsible for completing certain tasks, but be careful not to outsource accountability for the implementation – ultimately, the internal team will be accountable.

    Partner Implementation Methodologies

    Often vendors and/or SIs will have their own preferred implementation methodology. Consider the use of your partner's implementation methodology; however, you know what will work for your organization.

    Establish team composition

    1 – 2 hours

    Input: Skills assessment, Stakeholder analysis, Vendor partner selection

    Output: Team composition

    Materials: Sticky notes, Whiteboard, Markers

    Participants: Project team

    Use Info-Tech’s Governance and Management of Enterprise Software Implementation to establish your team composition. Within that blueprint:

    1. Assess the skills necessary for an implementation. Inventory the competencies required for the implementation project team. Map your internal resources to each competency as applicable.
    2. Select your internal implementation team. Determine who needs to be involved closely with the implementation. Key stakeholders should also be considered as members of your implementation team.
    3. Identify the number of external consultants/support required for implementation. Consider your in-house skills, timeline considerations, integration environment complexity, and cost constraints as you make your team composition plan. Be sure to dedicate an internal resource to managing the vendor and partner relationships.
    4. Document the roles and responsibilities, accountabilities, and other expectations of your team as they relate to each step of the implementation.

    Governance and Management of Enterprise Software Implementation

    Sample of the 'Governance and Management of Enterprise Software Implementation' blueprint.Follow our iterative methodology with a task list focused on the business must-have functionality to achieve rapid execution and to allow staff to return to their daily work sooner.

    Visit this link

    Ensure your implementation team has a high degree of trust and communication

    If external partners are needed, dedicate an internal resource to managing the vendor and partner relationships.

    Communication

    Teams must have some type of communication strategy. This can be broken into:
    • Regularity: Having a set time each day to communicate progress and a set day to conduct retrospectives.
    • Ceremonies: Injecting awards and continually emphasizing delivery of value can encourage relationship-building and constructive motivation.
    • Escalation: Voicing any concerns and having someone responsible for addressing those concerns.

    Proximity

    Distributed teams create complexity as communication can break down. This can be mitigated by:
    • Location: Placing teams in proximity can close the barrier of geographical distance and time zone differences.
    • Inclusion: Making a deliberate attempt to pull remote team members into discussions and ceremonies.
    • Communication tools: Having the right technology (e.g. video conference) can help bring teams closer together virtually.

    Trust

    Members should trust other members are contributing to the project and completing their required tasks on time. Trust can be developed and maintained by:
    • Accountability: Having frequent quality reviews and feedback sessions. As work becomes more transparent, people become more accountable.
    • Role clarity: Having a clear definition of what everyone’s role is.

    Plan for your implementation of CRM based on deployment model

    Place your CRM application into your IT landscape by configuring and adjusting the tool based on your specific deployment method.

    Icon of a housing development.
    On-Premises

    1. Identify custom features and configuration items
    2. Train developers and IT staff on new software investment
    3. Install software
    4. Configure software
    5. Test installation and configuration
    6. Test functionality

    Icon of a cloud upload.
    SaaS-based

    1. Train developers and IT staff on new software investment
    2. Set up connectivity
    3. Identify VPN or internal solution
    4. Check firewalls
    5. Validate bandwidth regulations

    Integration is a top IT challenge and critical to the success of the CRM suite

    CRM suites are most effective when they are integrated with ERP and MarTech solutions.

    Data interchange between the CRM solution and other data sources is necessary

    Formulate a comprehensive map of the systems, hardware, and software with which the CRM solution must be able to integrate. Customer data needs to constantly be synchronized: without this, you lose out on one of the primary benefits of CRM. These connections must be bidirectional for maximum value (i.e. marketing data to the CRM, customer data to MMS).
    Specialized projects that include an intricate prospect or customer list and complex rules may need to be built by IT The more custom fields you have in your CRM suite and point solutions, the more schema mapping you will have to do. Include this information in the RFP to receive guidance from vendors on the ease with which integration can be achieved.

    Pay attention to legacy apps and databases

    If you have legacy CRM, POS, or customer contact software, more custom code will be required. Many vendors claim that custom integration can be performed for most systems, but custom comes at a cost. Don’t just ask if they can integrate; ask how long it will take and for references from organizations which have been successful in this.
    When assessing the current application portfolio that supports CRM, the tendency will be to focus on the applications under the CRM umbrella, relating mostly to marketing, sales, and customer service. Be sure to include systems that act as inputs to, or benefit due to outputs from, the CRM or similar applications.

    CRM data flow

    Example of a CRM data flow.

    Be sure to include enterprise applications that are not included in the CRM application portfolio. Popular systems to consider for POIs include billing, directory services, content management, and collaboration tools.

    Sample CRM integration map

    Sample of a CRM integration map.

    Scenario: Failure to address CRM data integration will cost you in the long run

    A company spent $15 million implementing a new CRM system in the cloud and decided NOT to spend an additional $1.5 million to do a proper cloud DI tool procurement. The mounting costs followed.

    Cost Element – Custom Data Integration

    $

    2 FTEs for double entry of sales order data $ 100,000/year
    One-time migration of product data to CRM $ 240,000 otc
    Product data maintenance $ 60,000/year
    Customer data synchronization interface build $ 60,000 otc
    Customer data interface maintenance $ 10,000/year
    Data quality issues $ 100,000/year
    New SaaS integration built in year 3 $ 300,000 otc
    New SaaS integration maintenance $ 150,000/year

    Cost Element – Data Integration Tool

    $

    DI strategy and platform implementation $1,500,000 otc
    DI tool maintenance $ 15,000/year
    New SaaS integration point in year 3 $ 300,000 otc
    Thumbs down color coded red to the adjacent chart. Custom integration is costing this organization $300,000/year for one SaaS solution.
    Thumbs up color coded blue to the adjacent chart.

    The proposed integration solution would have paid for itself in 3-4 years and saved exponential costs in the long run.

    Proactively address data quality in the CRM during implementation

    Data quality is a make-or-break issue in a CRM platform; garbage in is garbage out.
    • CRM suites are one of the leading offenders for generating poor-quality data. As such, it’s important to have a plan in place for structuring your data architecture in such a way the poor data quality is minimized from the get-go.
    • Having a plan for data quality should precede data migration efforts; some types of poor data quality can be mitigated prior to migration.
    • There are five main types of poor-quality data found in CRM platforms.
      • Duplicate data: Duplicate records can be a major issue. Leverage dedicated deduplication tools to eliminate them.
      • Stale data: Out-of-date customer information can reduce the usefulness of the platform. Use automated social listening tools to help keep data fresh.
      • Incomplete data: Records with missing info limit platform value. Specify data validation parameters to mandate that all fields are filled in.
      • Invalid and conflicting data: These can create cascading errors. Establishing conflict resolution rules in ETL tools for data integration can lessen issues.
    Info-Tech Insight

    If you have a complex POI environment, appoint data stewards for each major domain and procure a deduplication tool. As the complexity of CRM system-to-system integrations increases, so will the chance that data quality errors will crop up – for example, bidirectional POI with other sources of customer information dramatically increase the chances of conflicting/duplicate data.

    Profile data, eliminate dead weight, and enforce standards to protect data

    Identify and eliminate dead weight

    Poor data can originate in the firm’s CRM system. Custom queries, stored procedures, or profiling tools can be used to assess the key problem areas.

    Loose rules in the CRM system may lead to records of no significant value in the database. Those rules need to be fixed, but if changes are made before the data is fixed, users could encounter database or application errors, which will reduce user confidence in the system.

    • Conduct a data flow analysis: map the path that data takes through the organization.
    • Use a mass cleanup to identify and destroy dead weight data. Merge duplicates either manually or with the aid of software tools. Delete incomplete data, taking care to reassign related data.
    • COTS packages typically allow power users to merge records without creating orphaned records in related tables, but custom-built applications typically require IT expertise.

    Create and enforce standards and policies

    Now that the data has been cleaned, it’s important to protect the system from relapsing.

    Work with business users to find out what types of data require validation and which fields should have changes audited. Whenever possible, implement drop-down lists to standardize values and make programming changes to ensure that truncation ceases.

    • Truncated data is usually caused by mismatches in data structures during either one-time data loads or ongoing data integrations.
    • Don’t go overboard on assigning required fields; users will just put key data in note fields.
    • Discourage the use of unstructured note fields: the data is effectively lost except if it gets subpoenaed.
    Info-Tech Insight

    Data quality concerns proliferate with the customization level of your platform. The more extensive the custom integration points and module/database extensions that you have made, the more you will need to have a plan in place for managing data quality from a reactive and proactive standpoint.

    Create a formal communication process throughout the CRM implementation

    Establish a comprehensive communication process around the CRM enterprise roll-out to ensure that end users stay informed.

    The CRM kick-off meeting(s) should encompass: 'The high-level application overview', 'Target business-user requirements', 'Target quality of service (QoS) metrics', 'Other IT department needs', 'Tangible business benefits of application', 'Special consideration needs'. The overall objective for interdepartmental CRM kick-off meetings is to confirm that all parties agree on certain key points and understand platform rationale and functionality.

    The kick-off process will significantly improve internal communications by inviting all affected internal IT groups, including business units, to work together to address significant issues before the application process is formally activated.

    Department groups or designated trainers should take the lead and implement a process for:

    • Scheduling CRM platform roll-out/kick-off meetings.
    • Soliciting preliminary input from the attending groups to develop further training plans.
    • Establishing communication paths and the key communication agents from each department who are responsible for keeping lines open moving forward.

    Ensure requirements are met with robust user acceptance testing

    User acceptance testing (UAT) is a test procedure that helps to ensure end-user requirements are met. Test cases can reveal bugs before the suite is implemented.

    Five Secrets of UAT Success

    Bracket with colors corresponding the adjacent list items.

    1

    Create the plan With the information collected from requirements gathering, create the plan. Make sure this information is added to the main project plan documentation.

    2

    Set the agenda The time allotted will vary depending on the functionality being tested. Ensure that the test schedule allows for the resolution of issues and discussion.

    3

    Determine who will participate Work with the relevant stakeholders to identify the people who can best contribute to system testing. Look for experienced power users who have been involved in earlier decision making about the system.

    4

    Highlight acceptance criteria Together with the UAT group, pinpoint the criteria to determine system acceptability. Refer back to requirements specified in use cases in the initial requirements-gathering stages of the project.

    5

    Collect end user feedback Weaknesses in resolution workflow design, technical architecture, and existing customer service processes can be highlighted and improved on with ongoing surveys and targeted interviews.

    Calculate post-deployment metrics to assess measurable value of the project

    Track the post-deployment results from the project and compare the metrics to the current state and target state.

    CRM Selection and Implementation Metrics
    Description Formula Current or Estimated Target Post-Deployment
    End-User Satisfaction # of Satisfied Users
    # of End Users
    70% 90% 85%
    Percentage Over/Under Estimated Budget Amount Spent - 100%
    Budget
    5% 0% 2%
    Percentage Over/Under Estimated Timeline Project Length - 100%
    Estimated Timeline
    10% -5% -10%

    CRM Strategy Metrics
    Description Formula Current or Estimated Target Post-Deployment
    Number of Leads Generated (per month) # of Leads Generated 150 200 250
    Average Time to Resolution (in minutes) Time Spent on Resolution
    # of Resolutions
    30 minutes 10 minutes 15 minutes
    Cost per Interaction by Campaign Total Campaign Spending
    # of Customer Interactions
    $17.00 $12.00 $12.00

    Select the Right CRM Platform

    CRM technology is critical to facilitate an organization’s relationships with customers, service users, employees, and suppliers. Having a structured approach to building a business case, defining key requirements, and engaging with the right shortlist of vendors to pick the best finalist is crucial.

    This selection guide allows organizations to execute a structured methodology for picking a CRM that aligns with their needs. This includes:
    • Alignment and prioritization of key business and technology drivers for a CRM selection business case.
    • Identification of key use cases and requirements for CRM.
    • Construction of a robust CRM RFP.
    • A strong market scan of key players.
    • A survey of crucial implementation considerations.
    This formal CRM selection initiative will drive business-IT alignment, identify sales and marketing automation priorities, and allow for the rollout of a platform that’s highly likely to satisfy all stakeholder needs.

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com
    1-888-670-8889

    Insight summary

    Stakeholder satisfaction is critical to your success

    Choosing a solution for a single use case and then expanding it to cover other purposes can be a way to quickly gain approvals and then make effective use of dollars spent. However, this can also be a nightmare if the product is not fit for purpose and requires significant customization effort for future use cases. Identify use cases early, engage stakeholders to define success, and recognize where you need to find balance between a single off-the-shelf CRM platform and adjacent MarTech or sales enablement systems.

    Build a business case

    An effective business case isn’t a single-purpose document for obtaining funding. It can also be used to drive your approach to product selection, requirements gathering, and ultimately evaluating stakeholder and user satisfaction.

    Use your business case to define use cases and milestones as well as success.

    Balance process with technology

    A new solution with old processes will result in incremental increased value. Evaluate existing processes and identify opportunities to improve and remove workarounds. Then define requirements.

    You may find that the tools you have would be adequate with an upgrade and tool optimization. If not, this exercise will prepare you to select the right solution for your current and future needs.

    Drive toward early value

    Lead with the most important benefit and consider the timeline. Most stakeholders will lose interest if they don’t realize benefits within the fist year. Can you reach your goal and report success within that timeline?

    Identify secondary, incremental customer engagement improvements that can be made as you work toward the overall goal to be achieved at the one-year milestone.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Stock image of an office worker. Build a Strong Technology Foundation for Customer Experience Management
    • Any CRM project needs to be guided by the broader strategy around customer engagement. This blueprint explores how to create a strong technology enablement approach for CXM using voice of the customer analysis.
    Stock image of a target with arrows. Improve Requirements Gathering
    • 70% of projects that fail do so because of poor requirements. If you need to double-click on best practices for eliciting, analyzing, and validating requirements as you build up your CRM picklist and RFP, this blueprint will equip you with the knowledge and tools you need to hit the ground running.
    Stock image of a pen on paper. Drive Successful Sourcing Outcomes with a Robust RFP Process
    • Managing a complex RFP process for an enterprise application like a CRM platform can be a challenging undertaking. This blueprint zooms into how to build, run, administer, and evaluate RFP responses effectively.

    Bibliography

    “Doomed From the Start? Why a Majority of Business and IT Teams Anticipate Their Software Development Projects Will Fail.” Geneca, 25 Jan. 2017. Web.

    Hall, Kerrie. “The State of CRM Data Management 2020.” Validity. 27 April 2020. Web.

    Hinchcliffe, Dion. “The Evolving Role of the CIO and CMO in Customer Experience.” ZDNet, 22 Jan. 2020. Web.

    Klie, L. “CRM Still Faces Challenges, Most Speakers Agree: CRM Systems Have Been Around for Decades, but Interoperability and Data Siloes Still Have to Be Overcome.” CRM Magazine, vol. 23, no. 5, 2019, pp. 13-14.

    Markman, Jon. "Netflix Knows What You Want... Before You Do." Forbes. 9 Jun. 2017. Web.

    Morgan, Blake. “50 Stats That Prove The Value Of Customer Experience.” Forbes, 24 Sept. 2019. Web.

    Taber, David. “What to Do When Your CRM Project Fails.” CIO Magazine, 18 Sept. 2017. Web.

    “The State of Project Management Annual Survey 2018.” Wellingtone, 2018. Web.

    “The History of Microsoft Dynamics.” Eswelt. 2021. Accessed 8 June 2022.

    “Unlock the Mysteries of Your Customer Relationships.” Harvard Business Review. 1 July 2014. Accessed 30 Mar. 2016.

    Develop a Project Portfolio Management Strategy

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}331|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.4/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $111,064 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 33 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Project Management Office
    • Parent Category Link: /project-management-office
    • As an IT leader, you oversee a project environment in which the organizational demand for new products, services, and enhancements far outweighs IT’s resource capacity to adequately deliver on everything.
    • As a result, project throughput suffers. IT starts a lot of projects, but has constant difficulties delivering the bulk of them on time, on budget, in scope, and of high quality. What’s more, many of the projects that consume IT’s time are of questionable value to the business.
    • You need a project portfolio management (PPM) strategy to help bring order to IT’s project activity. With the right PPM strategy, you can ensure that you’re driving the throughput of the best projects and maximizing stakeholder satisfaction with IT.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • IT leaders commonly conflate PPM and project management, falsely believing that they already have a PPM strategy via their project management playbook. While the tactical focus of project management can help ensure that individual projects are effectively planned, executed, and closed, it is no supplement for the insight into “the big picture” that a PPM strategy can provide.
    • Many organizations falter at PPM by mistaking a set of processes for a strategy. While processes are no doubt important, without an end in mind – such as that provided by a deliberate strategy – they inevitably devolve into inertia or confusion.
    • Executive layer buy-in is a critical prerequisite for the success of a PPM strategy. Without it, any efforts to reconcile supply and demand, and improve the strategic value of IT’s project activity, could be quashed by irresponsible, non-compliant stakeholders.

    Impact and Result

    • Manage the portfolio as more than just the sum of its parts. Create a coherent strategy to maximize the sum of values that projects deliver as a whole – as a project portfolio, rather than a collection of individual projects.
    • Get to value early. Info-Tech’s methodology tackles one of PPM’s most pressing challenges upfront by helping you to articulate a strategy and get executive buy-in for it before you define your process goals. When senior management understands why a PPM strategy is necessary and of value to them, the path to implementation is much more stable.
    • Create PPM processes you can sustain. Translate your PPM strategy into specific, tangible near-term and long-term goals, which are realized through a suite of project portfolio management processes tailored to your organization and its culture.

    Develop a Project Portfolio Management Strategy Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should develop a project portfolio management strategy, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    • Develop a Project Portfolio Management Strategy – Executive Brief
    • Develop a Project Portfolio Management Strategy – Phases 1-3

    1. Get executive buy-in for your PPM strategy

    Choose the right PPM strategy for your organization and get executive buy-in before you start to set PPM process goals.

    • Develop a Project Portfolio Management Strategy – Phase 1: Get Executive Buy-In for Your PPM Strategy
    • PPM High-Level Supply-Demand Calculator
    • PPM Strategic Plan Template
    • PPM Strategy-Process Goals Translation Matrix Template

    2. Align PPM processes to your strategic goals

    Use the advice and tools in this phase to align the PPM processes that make up the infrastructure around projects with your new PPM strategy.

    • Develop a Project Portfolio Management Strategy – Phase 2: Align PPM Processes to Your Strategic Goals
    • PPM Strategy Development Tool

    3. Complete your PPM strategic plan

    Refine your PPM strategic plan with inputs from the previous phases by adding a cost-benefit analysis and PPM tool recommendation.

    • Develop a Project Portfolio Management Strategy – Phase 3: Complete Your PPM Strategic Plan
    • Project Portfolio Analyst / PMO Analyst
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Develop a Project Portfolio Management Strategy

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Get Executive Buy-In for Your PPM Strategy

    The Purpose

    Choose the right PPM strategy for your organization and ensure executive buy-in.

    Set process goals to address PPM strategic expectations and steer the PPM strategic plan.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A right-sized PPM strategy complete with executive buy-in for it.

    A prioritized list of PPM process goals.

    Activities

    1.1 Assess leadership mandate.

    1.2 Determine potential resource capacity.

    1.3 Create a project inventory.

    1.4 Prepare to communicate your PPM strategy to key stakeholders.

    1.5 Translate each strategic goal into process goals.

    1.6 Set metrics and preliminary targets for PPM process goals.

    Outputs

    Choice of PPM strategy and the leadership mandate

    Analysis of current project capacity

    Analysis of current project demand

    PPM Strategic Plan – Executive Brief

    PPM strategy-aligned process goals

    Metrics and long-term targets for PPM process goals

    2 Align PPM Processes to Your Strategic Goals

    The Purpose

    Examine your current-state PPM processes and create a high-level description of the target-state process for each of the five PPM processes within Info-Tech’s PPM framework.

    Build a sound business case for implementing the new PPM strategy by documenting roles and responsibilities for key PPM activities as well as the time costs associated with them.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Near-term and long-term goals as well as an organizationally specific wireframe for your PPM processes.

    Time cost assumptions for your proposed processes to ensure sustainability.

    Activities

    2.1 Develop and refine the project intake, prioritization, and approval process.

    2.2 Develop and refine the resource management process.

    2.3 Develop and refine the portfolio reporting process.

    2.4 Develop and refine the project closure process

    2.5 Develop and refine the benefits realization process.

    Outputs

    Process capability level

    Current-state PPM process description

    Retrospective examination of the current-state PPM process

    Action items to achieve the target states

    Time cost of the process at current and target states

    3 Complete Your PPM Strategic Plan

    The Purpose

    Perform a PPM tool analysis in order to determine the right tool to support your processes.

    Estimate the total cost-in-use of managing the project portfolio, as well as the estimated benefits of an optimized PPM strategy.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A right-sized tool selection to help support your PPM strategy.

    A PPM strategy cost-benefit analysis.

    Activities

    3.1 Right-size the PPM tools for your processes.

    3.2 Conduct a cost-benefit analysis of implementing the new PPM strategy.

    3.3 Define roles and responsibilities for the new processes.

    3.4 Refine and consolidate the near-term action items into a cohesive plan.

    Outputs

    Recommendation for a PPM tool

    Cost-benefit analysis

    Roles and responsibilities matrix for each PPM process

    An implementation timeline for your PPM strategy

    Further reading

    Develop a Project Portfolio Management Strategy

    Drive IT project throughput by throttling resource capacity.

    Analyst Perspective

    “Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.” – Sun Tzŭ

    "Organizations typically come to project portfolio management (PPM) with at least one of two misconceptions: (1) that PPM is synonymous with project management and (2) that a collection of PPM processes constitutes a PPM strategy.

    Both foundations are faulty: project management and PPM are separate disciplines with distinct goals and processes, and a set of processes do not comprise a strategy – they should flow from a strategy, not precede one. When built upon these foundations, the benefits of PPM go unrealized, as the means (i.e. project and portfolio processes) commonly eclipse the ends of a PPM strategy – e.g. a portfolio better aligned with business goals, improved project throughput, increased stakeholder satisfaction, and so on.

    Start with the end in mind: articulate a PPM strategy that is truly project portfolio in nature, i.e. focused on the whole portfolio and not just the individual parts. Then, let your PPM strategy guide your process goals and help to drive successful outcomes, project after project." (Barry Cousins, Senior Director of Research, PMO Practice, Info-Tech Research Group)

    Our understanding of the problem

    This Research Is Designed For:

    • CIOs who want to maximize IT’s fulfillment of both business strategic goals and operational needs.
    • CIOs who want to better manage the business and project sponsors’ expectations and satisfaction.
    • CIOs, PMO directors, and portfolio managers who want a strategy to set the best projects for the highest chance of success.

    This Research Will Help You:

    • Get C-level buy-in on a strategy for managing the project portfolio and clarify their expectations on how it should be managed.
    • Draft strategy-aligned, high-level project portfolio management process description.
    • Put together a strategic plan for improving PPM processes to reclaim wasted project capacity and increase business satisfaction of IT.

    This Research Will Also Assist:

    • Steering committee and C-suite management who want to maximize IT’s value to business.
    • Project sponsors who seek clarity and fairness on pushing their projects through a myriad of priorities and objectives.
    • CIOs, PMO directors, and portfolio managers who want to enable data-driven decisions from the portfolio owners.

    This Research Will Help Them:

    • Optimize IT’s added value to the business through project delivery.
    • Provide clarity on how IT’s project portfolio should be managed and the expectations for its management.
    • Improve project portfolio visibility by making trustworthy project portfolio data available, with which to steer the portfolio.

    Executive Summary

    Situation

    • As CIO, there are too many projects and not enough resource capacity to deliver projects on time, on budget, and in scope with high quality.
    • Prioritizing projects against one another is difficult in the face of conflicting priorities and agenda; therefore, projects with dubious value/benefits consume resource capacity.

    Complication

    • Not all IT projects carry a direct value to business; IT is accountable for keeping the lights on and it consumes a significant amount of resources.
    • Business and project sponsors approve projects without considering the scarcity of resource capacity and are frustrated when the projects fail to deliver or linger in the backlog.

    Resolution

    • Create a coherent strategy to maximize the total value that projects deliver as a whole portfolio, rather than a collection of individual projects.
    • Ensure that the steering committee or senior executive layer buys into the strategy by helping them understand why the said strategy is necessary, and more importantly, why the strategy is valuable to them.
    • Translate the strategic expectations to specific, tangible goals, which are realized through a suite of project portfolio management processes tailored to your organization and its culture.
    • Putting into place people, processes, and tools that are sustainable and manageable, plus a communication strategy to maintain the stakeholder buy-in.

    Info-Tech Insight

    1. Time is money; therefore, the portfolio manager is an accountant of time. It is the portfolio manager’s responsibility to provide the project portfolio owners with reliable data and close the loop on portfolio decisions.
    2. Business satisfaction is driven by delivering projects that align to and maximize business value. Use Info-Tech’s method for developing a PPM strategy and synchronize its definition of “best projects” with yours.

    Projects that deliver on strategic goals of the business is the #1 driver of business satisfaction for IT

    Info-Tech’s CIO Business Vision Survey (N=21,367) has identified a direct correlation between IT project success and overall business satisfaction with IT.

    Comparative rankings of IT services in two columns 'Reported Importance' and 'Actual Importance' with arrows showing where each service moved to in the 'Actual Importance' ranking. The highlighted move is 'Projects' from number 10 in 'Reported' to number 1 in 'Actual'. 'Reported' rankings from 1 to 12 are 'Network Infrastructure', 'Service Desk', 'Business Applications', 'Data Quality', Devices', 'Analytical Capability', 'Client-Facing Technology', 'Work Orders', 'Innovation Leadership', 'Projects', 'IT Policies', and 'Requirements Gathering'. 'Actual' rankings from 1 to 12 are 'Projects', 'Work Orders', 'Innovation Leadership', 'Business Applications', 'Requirements Gathering', 'Service Desk', 'Client-Facing Technology', 'Network Infrastructure', 'Analytical Capability', 'Data Quality', 'IT Policies', and 'Devices'.

    Reported Importance: Initially, when CIOs were asked to rank the importance of IT services, respondents ranked “projects” low on the list – 10 out of a possible 12.

    Actual Importance: Despite this low “reported importance,” of those organizations that were “satisfied” to “fully satisfied” with IT, the service that had the strongest correlation to high business satisfaction was “projects,” i.e. IT’s ability to help plan, support, and execute projects and initiatives that help the business achieve its strategic goals.

    On average, executives perceive IT as being poorly aligned with business strategy

    Info-Tech’s CIO Business Vision Survey data highlights the importance of IT projects in supporting the business achieve its strategic goals. However, Info-Tech’s CEO-CIO Alignment Survey (N=124) data indicates that CEOs perceive IT to be poorly aligned to business’ strategic goals:

    • 43% of CEOs believe that business goals are going unsupported by IT.
    • 60% of CEOs believe that improvement is required around IT’s understanding of business goals.
    • 80% of CIOs/CEOs are misaligned on the target role for IT.
    • 30% of business stakeholders* are supporters of their IT departments.
    • (Source: Info-Tech CIO/CEO Alignment Diagnostics, * N=32,536)

    Efforts to deliver on projects are largely hampered by causes of project failure outside a project manager’s control

    The most recent data from the Project Management Institute (PMI) shows that more projects are meeting their original goals and business intent and less projects are being deemed failures. However, at the same time, more projects are experiencing scope creep. Scope creeps result in schedule and cost overrun, which result in dissatisfied project sponsors, stakeholders, and project workers.

    Graph of data from Project Management Institute comparing projects from 2015 to 2017 that 'Met original goals/business intent', 'Experienced scope creep', and were 'Deemed failures'. Projects from the first two categories went up in 2017, while projects that were deemed failures went down.

    Meanwhile, the primary causes of project failures remain largely unchanged. Interestingly, most of these primary causes can be traced to sources outside of a project manager’s control, either entirely or in part. As a result, project management tactics and processes are limited in adequately addressing them.

    Relative rank

    Primary cause of project failure

    2015

    2016

    2017

    Trend

    Change in organization's priorities 1st 1st 1st Stable
    Inaccurate requirements gathering 2nd 3rd 2nd Stable
    Change in project objectives 3rd 2nd 3rd Stable
    Inadequate vision/goal for project 6th 5th 4th Rising
    Inadequate/poor communication 5th 7th 5th Stable
    Poor change management 11th 9th 6th Rising
    (Source: Project Management Institute, Pulse of the Profession, 2015-2017)

    Project portfolio management (PPM) can improve business alignment of projects and reduce chance of project failure

    PPM is about “doing the right things.”

    The PMI describes PPM as:

    Interrelated organizational processes by which an organization evaluates, selects, prioritizes, and allocates its limited internal resources to best accomplish organizational strategies consistent with its vision, mission, and values. (PMI, Standard for Portfolio Management, 3rd ed.)

    Selecting and prioritizing projects with the strongest alignment to business strategy goals and ensuring that resources are properly allocated to deliver them, enable IT to:

    1. Improve business satisfaction and their perception of IT’s alignment with the business.
    2. Better engage the business and the project customers.
    3. Minimize the risk of project failure due to changing organizational/ project vision, goals, and objectives.

    "In today’s competitive business environment, a portfolio management process improves the linkage between corporate strategy and the selection of the ‘right’ projects for investment. It also provides focus, helping to ensure the most efficient and effective use of available resources." (Lou Pack, PMP, Senior VP, ICF International (PMI, 2015))

    PPM is a common area of shortcomings for IT, with much room for improvement

    Info-Tech’s IT Management & Governance Survey (N=879) shows that PPM tends to be regarded as neither an effective nor an important process amongst IT organizations.

    Two deviation from median charts highlighting Portfolio Management's ranking compared to other IT processes in 'Effectiveness scores' and 'Importance scores'. PPM ranks 37th out of 45 in Effectiveness and 33rd out of 45 in Importance.

    55% ... of IT organizations believe that their PPM processes are neither effective nor important.

    21% ... of IT organizations reported having no one responsible or accountable for PPM.

    62% ... of projects in organizations effective in PPM met/exceeded the expected ROI (PMI, 2015).

    In addition to PPM’s benefits, improving PPM processes presents an opportunity for getting ahead of the curve in the industry.

    Info-Tech’s methodology for developing a PPM strategy delivers extraordinary value, fast

    Our methodology is designed to tackle your hardest challenge first to deliver the highest-value part of the deliverable. For developing a PPM strategy, the biggest challenge is to get the buy-in of the executive layer.

    "Without senior management participation, PPM doesn’t work, and the organization is likely to end up with, or return to, a squeaky-wheel-gets-the-grease mindset for all those involved." (Mark Price Perry, Business Driven Project Portfolio Management)

    In the first step of the blueprint, you will be guided through the following steps:

    1. Choose the right PPM strategy: driven by the executives, supported by management.
    2. Objectively assess your current project portfolio with minimal effort to build a case for the PPM strategy.
    3. Engage the executive layer to get the critical prerequisite of a PPM strategy: their buy-in.

    A PPM strategic plan is the end deliverable of this blueprint. In the first step, download the pre-filled template with content that represents the most common case. Then, throughout the blueprint, customize with your data.

    Use this blueprint to develop, or refine, a PPM strategy that works for your organization

    Get buy-in for PPM strategy from decision makers.

    Buy-in from the owners of project portfolio (Steering Committee, C-suite management, etc.) is a critical prerequisite for any PPM strategy. This blueprint will give you the tools and templates to help you make your case and win the buy-in of portfolio owners.

    Connect strategic expectations to PPM process goals.

    This blueprint offers a methodology to translate the broad aim of PPM to practical, tactical goals of the five core PPM processes, as well as how to measure the results. Our methodology is supported with industry-leading frameworks, best practices, and our insider research.

    Develop your PPM processes.

    This blueprint takes you through a series of steps to translate the process goals into a high-level process description, as well as a business case and a roadmap for implementing the new PPM processes.

    Refine your PPM processes.

    Our methodology is also equally as applicable for making your existing PPM processes better, and help you draft a roadmap for improvement with well-defined goals, roles, and responsibilities.

    Info-Tech’s PPM model consists of five core processes

    There are five core processes in Info-Tech’s thought model for PPM.

    Info-Tech's Process Model detailing the steps and their importance in project portfolio management. Step 3: 'Status and Progress Reporting' sits above the others as a process of importance throughout the model. In the 'Intake' phase of the model are Step 1: 'Intake, Approval, and Prioritization' and Step 2: 'Resource Management'. In the 'Execution' phase is 'Project Management', the main highlighted section, and a part of Step 3, the overarching 'Status and Progress Reporting'. In the 'Closure' phase of the model are Step 4: 'Project Closure' and Step 5: 'Benefits Tracking'.

    These processes create an infrastructure around projects, which aims to enable:

    1. Initiation of the “best” projects with the right resources and project information.
    2. Timely and trustworthy reporting to facilitate the flow of information for better decision making.
    3. Proper closure of projects, releasing resources, and managing benefits realization.

    PPM has many moving pieces. To ensure that all of these processes work in harmony, you need a PPM strategy.

    De-couple project management from PPM to break down complexity and create flexibility

    Tailor project management (PM) processes to fit your projects.

    Info-Tech’s PPM thought model enables you to manage your project portfolio independent of your PM methodology or capability. Projects interact with PPM via:

    • A project charter that authorizes the use of resources and defines project benefits.
    • Status reports that feed up-to-date, trustworthy data to your project portfolio.
    • Acceptance of deliverables that enable proper project closure and benefits reporting.

    Info-Tech’s PPM strategy is applicable whether you use Agile, waterfall, or anything in between for PM.

    The process model from the previous page but with project management processes overlaid. The 'Intake' phase is covered by 'Project Charter'. The 'Execution' phase, or 'Project Management' is covered by 'Status report'. The 'Closure' phase is covered by 'Deliverable Acceptance'.

    Learn about project management approach for small projects in Info-Tech’s Tailor PM Processes to Fit Your Projects blueprint.

    Sample of the Info-Tech blueprint 'Tailor PM Processes to Fit Your Projects'.

    Info-Tech’s approach to PPM is informed by industry best practices and rooted in practical insider research

    Info-Tech uses PMI and ISACA frameworks for areas of this research.

    Logo for 'Project Management Institute (PMI)'.' Logo for 'COBIT 5 an ISACA Framework'.
    PMI’s Standard for Portfolio Management, 3rd ed. is the leading industry framework, proving project portfolio management best practices and process guidelines. COBIT 5 is the leading framework for the governance and management of enterprise IT.

    In addition to industry-leading frameworks, our best-practice approach is enhanced by the insights and guidance from our analysts, industry experts, and our clients.

    Logo for 'Info-Tech Research Group'.

    33,000+ Our peer network of over 33,000 happy clients proves the effectiveness of our research.

    1000+ Our team conducts 1,000+ hours of primary and secondary research to ensure that our approach is enhanced by best practices.

    Re-position IT as the “facilitator of business projects” for PPM success

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Construction
    Source: Info-Tech Client

    Chaos in the project portfolio

    At first, there were no less than 14 teams of developers, each with their own methodologies and processes. Changes to projects were not managed. Only 35% of the projects were completed on time.

    Business drives, IT facilitates

    Anyone had the right to ask for something; however, converting ideas to a formal project demand required senior leadership within a business division getting on board with the idea.

    The CIO and senior leadership decided that projects, previously assigned to IT, were to be owned and driven by the business, as the projects are undertaken to serve its needs and rarely IT’s own. The rest of the organization understood that the business, not IT, was accountable for prioritizing project work: IT was re-positioned as a facilitator of business projects. While it was a long process, the result speaks for itself: 75% of projects were now being completed on time.

    Balancing the target mix of the project portfolio

    What about maintaining and feeding the IT infrastructure? The CIO reserved 40% of IT project capacity for “keeping the lights on,” and 20% for reactive, unplanned activities, with an aim to lower this percentage. With the rest of the time, IT facilitated business projects

    Three key drivers of project priority

    1. Does the project meet the overall company goals and objectives?
      “If they don't, we must ask why we are bothering with it.”
    2. Does the project address a regulatory or compliance need?
      “Half of our business is heavily regulated. We must focus on it.”
    3. Are there significant savings to be had?
      “Not soft; hard savings. Can we demonstrate that, after implementing this, can we see good hard results? And, can we measure it?”

    "Projects are dumped on IT, and the business abdicates responsibility. Flip that over, and say ‘that's your project’ and ‘how can we help you?’"

    Use these icons to help direct you as you navigate this research

    Use these icons to help guide you through each step of the blueprint and direct you to content related to the recommended activities.

    A small monochrome icon of a wrench and screwdriver creating an X.

    This icon denotes a slide where a supporting Info-Tech tool or template will help you perform the activity or step associated with the slide. Refer to the supporting tool or template to get the best results and proceed to the next step of the project.

    A small monochrome icon depicting a person in front of a blank slide.

    This icon denotes a slide with an associated activity. The activity can be performed either as part of your project or with the support of Info-Tech team members, who will come onsite to facilitate a workshop for your organization.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Develop a PPM strategy – project overview

    1. Get executive buy-in for your PPM strategy

    2. Align PPM processes to your strategic goals

    3. Complete your PPM strategic plan

    Supporting Tool icon

    Best-Practice Toolkit

    1.1 Choose the right PPM strategy for your organization

    1.2 Translate PPM strategy expectations to specific process goals

    2.1 Develop and refine project intake, prioritization, and resource management processes

    2.2 Develop and refine portfolio reporting, project closure, and benefits realization processes

    3.1 Select a right-sized PPM solution for supporting your new processes

    3.2 Finalize customizing your PPM Strategic Plan Template

    Guided Implementations

    • Scoping call: discuss current state of PPM and review strategy options.
    • How to wireframe realistic process goals, rooted in your PPM strategic expectations, that will be sustained by the organization.
    • Examine your current-state PPM process and create a high-level description of the target-state process for each of the five PPM processes (1-2 calls per each process).
    • Assess your PPM tool requirements to help support your processes.
    • Determine the costs and potential benefits of your PPM practice.
    Associated Activity icon

    Onsite Workshop

    Module 1:
    Set strategic expectations and realistic goals for the PPM strategy
    Module 2:
    Develop and refine strategy-aligned PPM processes
    Module 3:
    Compose your PPM strategic plan
    Phase 1 Outcome:
    • Analysis of the current state of PPM
    • Strategy-aligned goals and metrics for PPM processes
    Phase 2 Outcome:
    • PPM capability levels
    • High-level descriptions of near- and long-term target state
    Phase 3 Outcome:
    • PPM tool recommendations
    • Cost-benefit analysis
    • Customized PPM strategic plan

    Workshop overview

    Contact your account representative or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Workshop Day 1

    Workshop Day 2

    Workshop Day 3

    Workshop Day 4

    Workshop Day 5

    Get leadership buy-in for PPM strategy Set PPM process goals and metrics with strategic expectations Develop and Refine PPM processes Develop and Refine PPM processes Complete the PPM strategic plan

    Activities

    • 1.1 Assess leadership mandate.
    • 1.2 Determine potential resource capacity.
    • 1.3 Create a project inventory.
    • 1.4 Communicate your PPM strategy to key stakeholders.
    • 2.1 Translate each strategic goal into process goals.
    • 2.2 Set metrics and preliminary targets for PPM process goals.
    • 3.1 Develop and refine the project intake, prioritization, and approval process.
    • 3.2 Develop and refine the resource management process.
    • 4.1 Develop and refine the portfolio reporting process.
    • 4.2 Develop and refine the project closure process.
    • 4.3 Develop and refine the benefits realization process.
    • 5.1 Right-size the PPM tools for your processes.
    • 5.2 Conduct a cost-benefit analysis of implementing the new PPM strategy.
    • 5.3 Define roles and responsibilities for the new processes.

    Deliverables

    1. Choice of PPM strategy and the leadership mandate
    2. Analysis of current project capacity
    3. Analysis of current project demand
    4. PPM Strategic Plan – Executive Brief
    1. PPM strategy-aligned process goals
    2. Metrics and long-term targets for PPM process goals
      For each of the five PPM processes:
    1. Process capability level
    2. Current-state PPM process description
    3. Retrospective examination of the current-state PPM process
    4. Action items to achieve the target states
    5. Time cost of the process at current and target states
    1. Recommendation for a PPM tool
    2. Cost-benefit analysis
    3. Roles and responsibilities matrix for each PPM process

    Develop a Project Portfolio Management Strategy

    PHASE 1

    Get Executive Buy-In for Your PPM Strategy

    Phase 1 outline

    Associated Activity icon Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 1: Get executive buy-in for your PPM strategy

    Proposed Time to Completion: 2 weeks
    Step 1.1: Choose the right PPM strategy Step 1.2: Translate strategic expectations to process goals
    Start with an analyst kick-off call:
    • Scoping call to discuss the current state of PPM and review strategy options.
    Work with an analyst to:
    • Discuss how to wireframe realistic process goals, rooted in your PPM strategic expectations, that will be sustained by the organization.
    Then complete these activities…
    • Execute a leadership mandate survey.
    • Perform a high-level supply/demand analysis.
    • Prepare an executive presentation to get strategy buy-in.
    Then complete these activities…
    • Develop realistic process goals based in your PPM strategic expectations.
    • Set metrics and preliminary targets for your high-priority PPM process goals.
    With these tools & templates:
    • PPM High-Level Supply/Demand Calculator
    • PPM Strategic Plan Template
    With these tools & templates:
    • PPM Strategy-Process Translation Matrix

    Phase 1 Results & Insights

    • Executive layer buy-in is a critical prerequisite for the success of a top-down PPM strategy. Ensure your executives are onboard before proceeding to implement your PPM strategy.

    Prepare to get to value early with step 1.1 of this blueprint

    The first step of this blueprint will help you define your PPM strategy and get executive buy-in for it using section one of Info-Tech’s PPM Strategic Plan Template.

    Where traditional models of consulting can take considerable amounts of time before delivering value to clients, Info-Tech’s methodology for developing a PPM strategy gets you to value fast.

    In the first step of this blueprint, you will define your PPM strategy and prepare an executive presentation to get buy-in for the strategy. The presentation can be prepared in just a few hours.

    • The activities in step 1.1 of this blueprint will help you customize the slides in section 1 of Info-Tech’s PPM Strategic Plan Template.
    • Section one of the Template will then serve as your presentation document.

    Once you have received buy-in for your PPM strategy, the remainder of this blueprint will help you customize section 2 of the Template.

    • Section 2 of the Template will communicate:
      • Your processes and process goals.
      • Your near-term and long-term action items for implementing the strategy.
      • Your PPM tool requirements.
      • The costs and benefits of your PPM strategy.

    Download Info-Tech’s PPM Strategic Plan Template.

    Sample of Info-Tech's 'PPM Strategic Plan Template.'

    Step 1.1: Choose the right PPM strategy for your organization

    PHASE 1

    PHASE 2

    PHASE 3

    1.1 1.2 2.1 2.2 3.1 3.2
    Choose the right PPM strategy Translate strategy into process goals Define intake & resource mgmt. processes Define reporting, closure, & benefits mgmt. processes Select a right-sized PPM solution Finalize your PPM strategic plan

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Perform a leadership mandate survey.
    • Choose your PPM strategy.
    • Calculate your resource capacity for projects.
    • Determine overall organizational demand for projects.
    • Prepare an executive presentation of the PPM strategy.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • PMO Director/Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • IT Managers

    Outcomes of this step

    • A PPM strategy
    • A resource supply/project demand analysis
    • An executive brief presentation
    • Executive buy-in for the PPM strategy

    “Too many projects, not enough resources” is the reality of most IT environments

    In today’s organizations, the desires of business units for new products and enhancements, and the appetites of senior leadership to approve more and more projects for those products and services, far outstrips IT’s ability to realistically deliver on everything.

    The vast majority of IT departments lack the resourcing to meet project demand – especially given the fact that day-to-day operational demands frequently trump project work.

    As a result, project throughput suffers – and with it, IT's reputation within the organization.

    A visualization of 'Project Demand' versus 'Resource supply' utilizing courtroom scales with numerous project titles weighing down the 'Project Demand' side and silhouettes of three little people raised aloft on the 'Resource supply' side.

    In these environments, a PPM strategy is required.

    A PPM strategy should enable executive decision makers to make sense of the excess of demand and give IT the ability to prioritize those projects that are of the most strategic value to the business.

    With the right PPM strategy, IT can improve project outcomes across its portfolio and drive business value – all while improving the workloads of IT project staff.

    Info-Tech has two PPM strategy options that you can start to deploy today

    This step will help you choose the most suitable option, depending on your project pain points and current level of executive engagement in actively steering the portfolio.

    Option A:
    Top-Down, Executive Driven Strategy

    Option B:
    Bottom-Up, Project Manager Driven Strategy

    Goals of this approach:
    • This approach is intended to assist decision makers in their job: choosing the right projects, committing to timelines for those projects, and monitoring/directing their progress.
    Goals of this approach:
    • This approach is primarily intended to ensure that projects are well managed in a standardized manner in order to provide project managers with clear direction.
    Who this approach is for:
    • IT departments looking to improve alignment of project demand and resource capacity.
    • IT departments wanting to prioritize strategically valuable work.
    • IT departments with sufficient executive backing and engagement with the portfolio.
    Who this approach is for:
    • IT departments that would not the get support for a top-down approach due to a disengaged executive layer.
    • IT departments that already have a top-down PPM strategy and feel they are sufficiently resourced to confront project demand.

    Each of these strategy options is driven by a set of specific strategic expectations to help communicate your PPM goals. See the following slides for an articulation of each strategy option.

    A top-down, executive driven strategy is the optimal route, putting leadership in a position to best conduct the portfolio

    Option A: Top-Down, Executive Driven Strategy

    Strategic Expectations:

    • Project Throughput: Maximize throughput of the best projects.
    • Portfolio Visibility: Ensure visibility of current and pending projects.
    • Portfolio Responsiveness: Make the portfolio responsive to executive steering when new projects and changing priorities need rapid action.
    • Resource Utilization: Minimize resource waste and optimize the alignment of skills to assignments.
    • Benefits Realization: Clarify accountability for post-project benefits attainment for each project, and facilitate the process of tracking/reporting those benefits.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Serve the executive with insight before you impede the projects with governance. This strategy option is where Info-Tech sees the most PPM success. A strategy focused at improving decision making at the executive layer will both improve project outcomes and help alleviate project workloads.

    A bottom-up strategy can help project managers and teams succeed where insight into the big picture is lacking

    Option B: Bottom-Up, Project Manager Driven Strategy

    Strategic Expectations:

    • Project Management Governance: All projects consuming IT resources will be continually validated in terms of best-practice process compliance.
    • Project Risk Management: Identify risks and related mitigation approaches for all high-risk areas.
    • Stakeholder Management: Ensure that project stakeholders are identified and involved.
    • Project Manager Resourcing: Provide project managers as needed.
    • Project-Level Visibility: Provide access to the details of project management processes (planning and progress) as needed.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Right-size governance to maximize success. Project management and governance success don’t necessarily equal project success. Project management processes should be a means to an end (i.e. successful project outcomes), and not an end in themselves. Ensure the ends justify the means.

    Most recurring project challenges require a top-down portfolio management approach

    While project management is a key ingredient to project success, tying to solve endemic project problems with project management alone won’t improve results over the long term.

    Why Top-Down is a better starting point than Bottom-Up.

    The most common IT project problems – schedule and budget overruns, scope creep, and poor quality – can ultimately, in the vast majority of cases, be traced back to bad decisions made at the portfolio level:

    • The wrong projects get greenlighted.
    • Shifting leadership priorities and operational demands make project plans and estimated delivery dates obsolete from the start.
    • Too many projects get approved when there are not enough resources to effectively work on them all.

    No amount of project management rigor can help alleviate these common root causes of project failure.

    With a top-down PPM strategy, however, you can make sure that leadership is informed and engaged in making the right project decisions and that project managers and teams are situated for success.

    "There is nothing so useless as doing efficiently that which should not be done at all." (Peter Drucker (quoted in Lessing))

    Info-Tech Insight

    Get Strategic About Project Success.

    The difference between project management and project portfolio management comes down to doing things right vs. doing the right things. Both are important, no doubt; but doing the wrong things well doesn’t provide much value to the business in the long run.

    Get insight into the big picture with a top-down strategy before imposing more administrative overhead on project managers and leads.

    Perform a leadership mandate assessment to gauge executive needs and expectations

    Associated Activity icon 1.1.1 – 15 to 30 minutes (prep time) 10 to 20 minutes (execution time)

    INPUT: Leadership expectations for portfolio and project management.

    OUTPUT: Leadership mandate bar chart

    Materials: Tab 6 of Info-Tech’s PPM High-Level Supply-Demand Calculator

    Participants: Portfolio manager (or equivalent), PPM strategy sponsor(s), CIO and other members of senior management

    Before choosing your strategy option, survey the organization’s leadership to assess what they’re expecting from the PPM strategy.

    Use the “Leadership Mandate Survey” (located on tab 6 of Info-Tech’s PPM High-Level Supply-Demand Calculator) to assess the degree to which your leadership expects the PPM strategy to provide outcomes across the following capabilities: portfolio reporting, project governance, and project management.

    • Deploy the 12-question survey via individual one-on-one meetings or group working sessions with your boss (the PPM strategy sponsor) as well as with the CIO and other senior managers from within IT and the business.
      • If you cannot connect with the executive layer for this survey, do your best to estimate their responses to complete the survey.
    • The survey should help distinguish if executives are looking for portfolio management or project management. It should be one input that informs your choice of strategy option A or B.
      • If leadership is looking primarily for project management, you should proceed to Info-Tech’s Tailor Project Management Processes that Fit Your Projects blueprint.

    Refer to the next slide for assistance analyzing the outputs in tab 6 and using them to inform your choice of strategy.

    How to make use of the results of the leadership survey

    Two possible result scenarios of the leadership survey. There are two bar graphs titled 'Leadership Mandate', each with an explanation of the scenario they belong to. In Scenario 1, the 'Leadership Mandate' graph has a descending trend with 'Portfolio Reporting' at the highest level, 'Project Governance' in the middle, and 'Project Management' at the lowest level. 'A result like this, with a higher portfolio reporting score, shows a higher need for a top-down approach and demonstrates well-balanced expectations for a PPM strategy from the leadership. There is greater emphasis put on the portfolio than there is project governance or project management.' In Scenario 2, the 'Leadership Mandate' graph has an ascending trend with 'Portfolio Reporting' at the lowest level, 'Project Governance' in the middle, and 'Project Management' at the highest level. 'If your graph looks like this, your executive leadership has placed greater importance on project governance and management. Completing a top-down PPM strategy may not meet their expectations at this time. In this situation, a bottom-up approach may be more applicable.'

    Customize Info-Tech’s PPM Strategic Plan Template. Insert screenshots of the survey and the bar graph from tab 6 of the PPM High-Level Supply-Demand Calculator onto slides 7 and 8, “PPM Strategy Leadership Mandate,” of the PPM Strategic Plan Template.

    Proceed with the right PPM strategy for your organization

    Based upon the results of the “Leadership Mandate Survey,” and your assessment of each strategy option as described in the previous slides, choose the strategy option that is right for your IT department/PMO at this time.

    "Without a strategic methodology, project portfolio planning is frustrating and has little chance of achieving exceptional business success." (G Wahl (quoted in Merkhofer))

    Option A:

    Those proceeding with Option A should continue with remainder of this blueprint. Update your strategy statement on slide 3 of your PPM Strategic Plan Template to reflect your choice

    Option B:

    Those proceeding with Option B should exit this blueprint and refer to Info-Tech’s Tailor Project Management Processes to Fit Your Projects blueprint to help define a project management standard operating procedure.

    Customize Info-Tech’s PPM Strategic Plan Template. If you’re proceeding with Option A, update slide 4, “Project Portfolio Management Strategy,” of your PPM Strategic Plan Template to reflect your choice of PPM strategy. If you’re proceeding with Option B, you may want to include your strategy statement in your Project Management SOP Template.

    The success of your top-down strategy will hinge on the quality of your capacity awareness and resource utilization

    A PPM strategy should facilitate alignment between project demand with resource supply. Use Info-Tech’s PPM High-Level Supply/Demand Calculator as a step towards this alignment.

    Info-Tech’s research shows that the ability to provide a centralized view of IT’s capacity for projects is one of the top PPM capabilities that contributes to overall project success.

    Accurate and reliable forecasts into IT’s capacity, coupled with an engaged executive layer making project approval and prioritization decisions based upon that capacity data, is the hallmark of an effective top-down PPM strategy.

    • Use Info-Tech’s PPM High-Level Supply/Demand Calculator to help improve visibility (and with it, organizational understanding) into project demand and IT resource supply.
    • The Calculator will help you determine IT’s actual capacity for projects and analyze organizational demand by taking an inventory of active and backlog projects.

    Download Info-Tech’s PPM High-Level Supply/Demand Calculator.

    Sample of Into-Tech's PPM High-Level Supply/Demand Calculator.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Where does the time go? The portfolio manager (or equivalent) should function as the accounting department for time, showing what’s available in IT’s human resources budget for projects and providing ongoing visibility into how that budget of time is being spent.

    Establish the total resource capacity of your portfolio

    Associated Activity icon 1.1.2 – 30 to 60 minutes

    INPUT: Staff resource types, Average work week, Estimated allocations

    OUTPUT: Breakdown of annual portfolio HR spend, Capacity pie chart

    Materials: PPM High-Level Supply/Demand Calculator, tab 3

    Participants: Portfolio manager (or equivalent), Resource and/or project managers

    Use tab 3 of the calculator to determine your actual HR portfolio budget for projects, relative to the organization’s non-project demands.

    • Tab 3 analyzes your resource supply asks you to consider how your staff spend their time weekly across four categories: out of office time, administrative time (e.g. meetings, training, checking email), keep-the-lights-on time (i.e. support and maintenance), and project time.
    • The screenshot below walks you through columns B to E of tab 3, which help calculate your potential capacity. This activity will continue on the next slide, where we will determine your realized capacity for project work from this potential capacity.
    Screenshot of tab 3 in the PPM High-Level Supply/Demand Calculator. It has 4 columns, 'Resource Type', '# People', 'Hours / Week', and 'Hours / Year', which are referred to in notes as columns B through E respectively. The note on 'Resource Type' reads '1. Compile a list of each of the roles within your department in column B'. The note on '# People' reads '2. In column C, provide the number of staff currently performing each role'. The note on 'Hours / Week' reads '3. In column D, provide a baseline for the number of hours in a typical work week for each role'. The note on 'Hours / Year' reads '4. Column E will auto-populate based on E and D. The total at the bottom of column E (row 26) constitutes your department’s total capacity'.

    Determine the project/non-project ratio for each role

    Associated Activity icon 1.1.2 (continued)

    The previous slide walked you through columns B to E of tab 3. This slide walks you through columns F to J, which ask you to consider how your potential capacity is spent.

    Screenshot of tab 3 in the PPM High-Level Supply/Demand Calculator. It has 6 columns, 'Hours / Year', 'Absence', 'Working Time / Year', 'Admin', 'KTLO', and 'Project Work', which, starting at 'Absence', are referred to in notes as columns F through J respectively. The note on 'Absence' reads '5. Enter the percentage of your total time across each role that is unavailable due to foreseeable out-of-office time (vacation, sick time, etc.) in column F. Industry standard runs anywhere from 12% to 16%, depending on your industry and geographical region'. The note on 'Working Time / Year' reads '6. Column G will auto-calculate to show your overall net capacity after out-of-office percentages have been taken off the top. These totals constitute your working time for the year'. The note on 'Admin' and 'KTLO' reads '6. Column G will auto-calculate to show your overall net capacity after out-of-office percentages have been taken off the top. These totals constitute your working time for the year'. The note on 'Project Work' reads '8. The project percentage in column J will auto-calculate based upon what’s leftover after your non-project working time allocations in columns H and I have been subtracted'.

    Review your annual portfolio capacity for projects

    Associated Activity icon 1.1.2 (continued)

    The previous slides walked you through the inputs for tab “3. Project Capacity.” This slide walks you through the outputs of the tab.

    Based upon the inputs from columns B to J, the rest of tab 3 analyzes how IT available time is spent across the time categories, highlighting how much of IT’s capacity is actually available for projects after admin work, support and maintenance work, and absences have been taken into account.

    A table and pie chart of output data from Tab 3 of the PPM High-Level Supply/Demand Calculator. Pie segments are labelled 'Admin', 'Absence', 'Project Capacity', and 'Keep The Lights On'.

    Customize Info-Tech’s PPM Strategic Plan Template. Update slide 10, “Current Project Capacity,” of your PPM Strategic Plan Template to include the outputs from tab 3 of the Calculator.

    Create an inventory of active and backlog projects to help gauge overall project demand

    Associated Activity icon 1.1.3 – 15 to 30 minutes

    INPUT: Number of active and backlog projects across different sizes

    OUTPUT: Total project demand in estimated hours of work effort

    Materials: PPM High-Level Supply/Demand Calculator, tab 4

    Participants: Portfolio manager (or equivalent), Project managers

    Where tab 3 of the Calculator gave you visibility into your overall resource supply for projects, tab 4 will help you establish insight into the demand side.

    • Before starting on tab 4, be sure to enter the required project size data on the set-up tab.
    • Using a list of current active projects, categorize the items on the list by size: small, medium, large, and extra large. Enter the number of projects in each category of project in column C of tab 4.
    • Using a list of on-hold projects, or projects that have been approved but not started, categorize the list by size and enter the number of projects in each category in column D.
    • In column E, estimate the number of new requests and projects across each size that you anticipate being added to the portfolio/backlog in the next 12 months. Use historical data from the past 12 to 24 months to inform your estimates.
    • In column F, estimate the number of projects that you anticipate being completed in each size category in the next 12 months. Take the current state of active projects into account as you make your estimates, as well as throughput data from the previous 12 to 24 months.
    Screenshot of tab 4 in the PPM High-Level Supply/Demand Calculator. It has 5 columns labelled 'Project Types' with values Small to Extra-Large, 'Number of active projects currently in the portfolio', 'Number of projects currently in the portfolio backlog', 'Number of new requests anticipated to be added to the portfolio/backlog in the next 12 months', and 'Number of projects expected to be delivered within the next 12 months'.

    Make supply and demand part of the conversation as you get buy-in for your top-down strategy

    Tab 5 of the Calculator is an output tab, visualizing the alignment (or lack thereof) of project demand and resource supply.

    Once tabs 3 and 4 are complete, use tab 5 to analyze the supply/demand data to help build your case for a top-down PPM strategy and get buy-in for it.

    Screenshots of Tab 5 in the PPM High-Level Supply/Demand Calculator. A bar chart obscures a table with the note 'The bar chart shows your estimated total project demand in person hours (in black) relative to your estimated total resource capacity for projects (in green)'. Notes on the table are 'The table below the bar chart shows your estimated annual project throughput rate (based upon the number of projects you estimated you would complete this year) as well as the rate at which portfolio demand will grow (based upon the number of new requests and projects you estimated for the next 12 months)' and 'If the “Total Estimated Project Demand (in hours) in 12 Months Time” number is more than your current demand levels, then you have a supply-demand problem that your PPM strategy will need to address'.

    Customize Info-Tech’s PPM Strategic Plan Template. Update slides 11 and 12, “Current Project Demand,” of your PPM Strategic Plan Template to include the outputs from tabs 4 and 5 of the Calculator.

    Recommended: Complete Info-Tech’s PPM Current State Scorecard to measure your resource utilization

    Associated Activity icon Contact your rep or call 1-888-670-8889

    This step is highly recommended but not required. Call 1-888-670-8889 to inquire about or request the PPM Diagnostics.

    Info-Tech’s PPM Current State Scorecard diagnostic provides a comprehensive view of your portfolio management strengths and weaknesses, including project portfolio management, project management, customer management, and resource utilization.

    Screenshots of Info-Tech's PPM Current State Scorecard diagnostic with a pie chart obscuring a table/key. The attached note reads 'In particular, the analysis of resource utilization in the PPM Current State Scorecard report, will help to complement the supply/demand analysis in the previous slides. The diagnostic will help you to analyze how, within that percentage of your overall capacity that is available for project work, your staff productively utilizes this time to successfully complete project tasks and how much of this time is lost within Info-Tech’s categories of resource waste.'

    Customize Info-Tech’s PPM Strategic Plan Template. Update slides 14 and 15, “Current State Resource Utilization” of your PPM Strategic Plan Template to include the resource utilization outputs from your PPM Current State Scorecard.

    Finalize section one of the PPM Strategic Plan Template and prepare to communicate your strategy

    Associated Activity icon 1.1.4 – 10 to 30 minutes

    INPUT: The previous activities from this step

    OUTPUT: An presentation communication your PPM strategy

    Materials: PPM Strategic Plan Template, section 1

    Participants: Portfolio manager (or equivalent)

    By now, you should be ready to complete section one of the PPM Strategic Plan Template.

    The purpose of this section of the Template is to capture the outputs of this step and use them to communicate the value of a top-down PPM strategy and to get buy-in for this strategy from senior management before you move forward to develop your PPM processes in the subsequent phases of this blueprint.

    • Within section one, update any of the text that is (in grey) to reflect the specifics of your organization – i.e. the name of your organization and department – and the specific outcomes of step 1.2 activities. In addition, replace the placeholders for a company logo with the logo of your company.
    • Replace the tool screenshots with the outputs from your version of the PPM High-Level Supply/Demand Calculator.
    • Proofread all of the text to ensure the content accurately reflects your outcomes. Edit the content as needed to more accurately reflect your outcomes.
    • Determine the audience for the presentation of your PPM strategy and make a logistical arrangement. Include PPM strategy sponsors, senior management from within IT and the business, and other important stakeholders.

    Get executive buy-in for your top-down PPM strategy

    Executive layer buy-in is a critical prerequisite for the success of a top-down PPM strategy. Ensure your executives are on board before preceding.

    You’re now ready to communicate your PPM strategy to your leadership team and other stakeholders.

    It is essential that you get preliminary buy-in for this strategy from the executive layer before you move forward to develop your PPM processes in the subsequent phases of this blueprint. Lack of executive engagement is one of the top barriers to PPM strategy success.

    • If you have gone through the preceding activities in this step, section one of your PPM Strategic Plan Template should now be ready to present.
    • As explained in 1.1.4, you should present this section to an audience of PPM strategy sponsors, C-suite executives, and other members of the senior management team.
    • Allow at least 60 minutes for the presentation – around 20 minutes to deliver the slide presentation and 40 minutes for discussion.
    • If you get sufficient buy-in by the end of the presentation, proceed to the next step of this blueprint. If buy-in is lacking, now might not be the right time for a top-down PPM strategy. Think about adopting a bottom-up approach until leadership is more engaged in the portfolio.

    "Gaining executive sponsorship early is key…It is important for the executives in your organization to understand that the PPM initiatives and the PMO organization are there to support (but never hinder) executive decision making." (KeyedIn Projects)

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Engage(d) sponsorship. According to Prosci, the top factor in contributing to the success of a change initiative is active and visible executive sponsorship. Use this meeting to communicate to your sponsor(s) the importance of their involvement in championing the PPM strategy.

    A PPM strategic plan elevates PMO’s status to a business strategic partner

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Public Administration
    Source: IAG / Info-Tech Interview

    Challenge

    The PMO operated in a way that is, in their self-assessment, reactive; project requests and capacity were not effectively managed. Perhaps due to this, the leadership team was not always visible, or regularly available, to PM leaders. This, in turn, complicated efforts to effectively manage their projects.

    Solution

    Establishing a simple prioritization methodology enabled the senior leadership to engage and effectively steer the project portfolio by strategic importance. The criteria and tool also gave the business units a clear understanding to promote the strategic value of each of their project requests.

    Results

    PM leaders now have the support and confidence of the senior leadership team to both proactively manage and deliver on strategic projects. This new prioritization model brought the PM Leader and senior leadership team in direct access with each other.

    "By implementing this new project intake and prioritization framework, we drastically improved our ability to predict, meet, and manage project requests and unit workload. We adopted a client-focused and client-centric approach that enabled all project participants to see their role and value in successful project delivery. We created methodologies that were easy to follow from the client participation perspective, but also as PM leaders, provided us with the metrics, planning, and proactive tools to meet and anticipate client project demand. The response from our clients was extremely positive, encouraging, and appreciative."

    Step 1.2: Translate PPM strategic expectations to process goals

    PHASE 1

    PHASE 2

    PHASE 3

    1.11.22.12.23.13.2
    Choose the right PPM strategyTranslate strategy into process goalsDefine intake & resource mgmt. processesDefine reporting, closure, & benefits mgmt. processesSelect a right-sized PPM solutionFinalize your PPM strategic plan

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Determine process goals based upon your PPM strategy.
    • Set metrics and preliminary targets for your PPM processes.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • Steering Committee
    • Business Unit Leaders
    • PMO Director/Portfolio Manager

    Outcomes of this step

    • Stakeholder-prioritized PPM process goals
    • Metrics and targets for high-priority process goals

    Use the PPM strategy to set the direction for PPM processes that make up the infrastructure around projects

    PPM strategy enables you to answer any and all of these questions in a way that is consistent, cohesive, and aligned with one another.

    Info-Tech's PPM Process Model from earlier with notes overlaid asking a series of questions. The questions for '1. Intake, Approval, and Prioritization' are 'Who can request a project? How do you request a project? Who decides what to fund? What is the target investment mix? How will they decide?' The questions for '2. Resource Management' are 'Who assigns the resources? Who feeds the data on resources? How do we make sure it’s valid? How do we handle contingencies when projects are late, or if availability changes?' The questions for '3. Status and Progress Reporting' are 'What project information that should be reported? Who reports on project status? When? How?' The questions between 'Project Management' and '4. Project Closure' are 'Who declares that a project is done? Who validates it? Who is this reported to? Who terminates low-value projects? How will they decide?' The questions for '5. Benefits Tracking' are 'How do we validate the project benefits from the original business case? How do we track the benefits? Who reports it? When?'

    Set process goals to address PPM strategic expectations and steer the PPM strategic plan

    Associated Activity icon 1.2.1 – 2 hours

    INPUT: PPM strategy & expectations, Organizational strategy and culture

    OUTPUT: Prioritized list of strategy-aligned PPM process goals

    Materials: PPM Strategy-Process Translation Matrix

    Participants: CIO, Steering Committee, Business Unit Leaders, PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager

    This activity is designed for key departmental stakeholders to articulate how PPM processes should be developed or refined to meet the PPM strategic expectations.

    Participation of the key departmental stakeholders in this exercise is critical, e.g. CIO, Steering Committee, business unit leaders.

    Strategic Expectations x Processes = Process goals aligned to strategy
    Throughput Project Intake, Approval, & Prioritization
    Visibility Resource Management
    Responsiveness Status & Progress Reporting
    Resource Utilization Project Closure
    Benefits Benefits Realization

    Download Info-Tech’s PPM Strategy-Process Goals Translation Matrix Template.

    Use Info-Tech’s Translation Matrix to systematically articulate strategy-aligned PPM process goals

    Supporting Tool icon 1.2.1 – PPM Strategy-Process Translation Matrix, tab 2

    Formula: To answer “[question]” in a way that we can [strategic expectation], it will be important to [process goal].

    Example 1:
    To answer the question “who can request a project, and how?” in a way that we can maximize the throughput of the best projects, it will be important to standardize the project request process.

    Example 2:
    To answer the question “how will they decide what to fund?” in a way that we can maximize the throughput of the best projects, it will be important to reach a consensus on project prioritization criteria.

    Example 3:
    To answer the question “how will we track the projected benefits?” in a way that we can maximize the throughput of the best projects, it will be important to double-check the validity of benefits before projects are approved.

    Screenshot of Tab 2 in Info-Tech's PPM Strategy-Process Translation Matrix tool. There is a table with notes overlaid 'Enter the process goals in the appropriate question–strategic expectation slot' and 'Assign a priority, from the most important (1) to the least important (5)'.

    Set metrics and preliminary targets for your high-priority PPM process goals

    Associated Activity icon 1.2.2 – 1-2 hours

    INPUT: Prioritized list of strategy-aligned PPM process goals, Organizational strategy and culture

    OUTPUT: Metrics and targets for high-priority PPM process goals

    Materials: PPM Strategy-Process Translation Matrix

    Participants: CIO, Steering Committee, Business Unit Leaders, PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager

    Your highest-priority process goals and their corresponding strategy expectations are displayed in tab 3 of the PPM Strategy-Process Translation Matrix template (example below).

    Through a group discussion, document what will be measured to decide the achievement of each process goal, as well as your current estimate and the long-term target. If necessary, adjust the approximate target duration.

    Screenshot of Tab 3 in Info-Tech's PPM Strategy-Process Translation Matrix tool. There is a table with 6 columns 'PPM Process', 'High-priority Process Goals', 'Strategy Expectation', 'How will you measure success?', 'Current Estimate', and 'Long-Term Target'; they are referred to in notes as columns B through G respectively. Overlaid notes are 'Columns C and D will auto-populate based upon your inputs from tab 2. The five PPM process areas are arranged vertically in column B and your top-five process goals from each area appear in column C.' 'Use column E to brainstorm how you might measure the success of each process goal at your organization. These can be tentative for now and refined over time.' 'Determine current metrics for each process goals and long-term target metrics in columns F and G.'

    Project-client-centered approach to PPM process design improves client satisfaction and team confidence

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Public Administration
    Source: IAG / Info-Tech Interview

    Challenge

    Reactive instead of proactive

    "We had no effective means of tracking project intake requests vs. capacity. We struggled using ad hoc processes and methods which worked to meet immediate needs, but we quickly realized that they were ineffective in tracking critical project metrics, key performance indicators (KPIs), or performance measures...In short, we were being reactive, instead of proactive."

    The result was a disorganized portfolio that led to low client satisfaction and team morale.

    Solution

    Examine processes “through the eyes of the client”

    With the guiding principle of “through the eyes of the client,” PPM processes and tools were developed to formalize project intake, prioritization, and capacity planning. All touchpoints between client and PPM processes were identified, and practices for managing client expectations were put in place. A client satisfaction survey was formulated as part of the post-project assessment and review.

    Results

    Client-centered processes improved client satisfaction and team confidence

    People, processes, and tools are now aligned to support client demand, manage client expectations, measure project KPIs, and perform post-project analysis. A standard for client satisfaction metrics was put in place. The overwhelmingly positive feedback has increased team confidence in their ability to deliver quality efforts.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech Workshop Associated Activity icon

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    Photo of Barry Cousins.
    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analyst will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech's historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    Sample of activity 1.1.2 'Determine your actual resource capacity for projects'. Determine your actual resource capacity for projects

    Work with Info-Tech analysts to define your project vs. non-project ratio to help define how much of your overall resource capacity is actual available for projects.

    Sample of activity 1.2.1 'Set realistic PPM process goals'. Set realistic PPM process goals

    Leverage Info-Tech facilitators to help walk you through our PPM framework and define achievable process goals that are rooted in your current PPM maturity levels and organizational culture.

    Develop a Project Portfolio Management Strategy

    PHASE 2

    Align PPM Processes to Your Strategic Goals

    Phase 2 outline

    Associated Activity icon Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 2: Align PPM processes to your strategic goals

    Proposed Time to Completion: 2-4 weeks
    Step 2.1: Develop intake & resource mgmt. processes Step 2.2: Define reporting, closure, & benefits processes
    Work with an analyst to:
    • Assess your current intake, prioritization, and resource management processes and wireframe a sustainable target state for each capability.
    Work with an analyst to:
    • Analyze your current portfolio reporting, project closure, and benefits realization processes and wireframe a sustainable target state for each capability.
    Then complete these activities…
    • Set near-term and long-term goals.
    • Draft high-level steps within your target-state processes.
    • Document your process steps and roles and responsibilities.
    Then complete these activities…
    • Set near-term and long-term goals.
    • Draft high-level steps within your target-state processes.
    • Document your process steps and roles and responsibilities.
    With these tools & templates:
    • PPM Strategy Development Tool
    • PPM Strategic Plan Template
    With these tools & templates:
    • PPM Strategy Development Tool
    • PPM Strategic Plan Template

    Phase 2 Results & Insights

    • The means of project and portfolio management (i.e. processes) shouldn’t eclipse the ends – strategic goals. Root your process in your PPM strategic goals to realize PPM benefits (e.g. optimized portfolio value, improved project throughput, increased stakeholder satisfaction).

    Read first: Overview of the methodology for articulating new strategy-aligned PPM processes

    In the previous step of the blueprint, key department stakeholders established the PPM process goals, metrics, and targets in a way that aligns with the overall PPM strategy. In this phase, we draft a high-level description of the five PPM processes that reflect those goals using the following methodology:

    Methodology at a glance

    1. Articulate the current state of the process.
    2. Examine the process against the strategy-aligned goals.
    3. Create short- and long-term action items to refine the current process and meet the strategy-aligned targets.
    4. Develop a high-level target-state description of the PPM process.
    5. Estimate costs-in-use of the target-state process.

    Out-of-scope topics

    • Draft a detailed target-state description of the PPM process. Avoid falling into the “analysis paralysis” trap and keep the discussion focused on the overall PPM strategy.
    • PPM tools to support the process. This discussion will take place in the next phase of the blueprint.

    INPUT

    –›

    PROCESS

    –›

    OUTPUT

    • Strategy-aligned process goals, metrics, and targets (Activity 1.2.1)
    • Knowledge of current process
    • Knowledge of organizational culture and structure
    • Capability level assessment
    • Table-top design planning activity
    • Start-stop-continue retrospective
    • High-level description of the target state
    • PPM Strategy Development Tool
    • High-level descriptions of current and target states
    • Short- and long-term action items for improving the process
    • Cost-in-use of the current- and target-state processes

    Download Info-Tech’s PPM Strategy Development Tool

    Build a sound business case for implementing the new PPM strategy with realistic costs and benefits of managing your project portfolio.

    Time spent on managing the project portfolio is an investment. Like any other business endeavors, the benefits must outweigh the costs to be worth doing.

    As you draft a high-level description of the PPM processes in this phase of the blueprint, use Info-Tech’s PPM Strategy Development Tool to track the estimate the cost-in-use of the process. In the next phase, this information will be inform a cost-benefit analysis, which will be used to support your plan to implement the PPM strategy.

    Download Info-Tech’s PPM Strategy Development Tool.

    Screenshots of Info-Tech's PPM Strategy Development Tool including a Cost-Benefit Analysis with tables and graphs.

    Step 2.1: Develop and refine project intake, prioritization, and resource management processes

    PHASE 1

    PHASE 2

    PHASE 3

    1.11.22.12.23.13.2
    Choose the right PPM strategyTranslate strategy into process goalsDefine intake & resource mgmt. processesDefine reporting, closure, & benefits mgmt. processesSelect a right-sized PPM solutionFinalize your PPM strategic plan

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Determine your process maturity.
    • Benchmark current processes against strategy-aligned goals.
    • Set near- and long-term action items.
    • Draft a high-level description of your target state.
    • Document your new processes.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • PMO Director/Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Resource Managers
    • Business Analysts

    Outcomes of this step

    • A definition of current and target state maturity levels for intake, prioritization, and resource management
    • Near-term and long-term process goals for intake, prioritization, and resource management
    • A high-level wireframe for your intake, prioritization, and resource management process steps

    Project intake, prioritization, and approval: Get projects with the highest value done first

    Give your organization the voice to say “no” (or “not yet”) to new projects.

    Questions

    • Who can request a project?
    • How do you request a project?
    • Who decides what to fund?
    • What is the target investment mix?
    • How will they decide?

    Benefits

    • Maximize value of time spent on project work by aligning projects with priorities and stakeholder needs.
    • Finish the projects you start by improving alignment of intake and prioritization with resource capacity.
    • Improve stakeholder satisfaction by managing expectations with consistent, streamlined processes.

    Challenges

    • Stakeholders who benefit from political or ad hoc prioritization processes will resist or circumvent formal intake processes.
    • Many organizations lack sufficient awareness of resource capacity necessary to align intake with availability.

    A graph highlighting the sweet spot of project intake decision making. The vertical axis is 'Rigor and Effort' increasing upward, and the horizontal axis is 'Quality and Effectiveness of Decisions' increasing to the right. The trend line starts at 'Gut Feel' with low 'Rigor and Effort', and gradually curves upward to 'Analysis Paralysis' at the top. A note with an arrow pointing to a midway point in the line reads 'The sweet spot changes between situations and types of decisions'.

    Info-Tech Insight

    This process aims to control the project demand. A balance between rigor and flexibility is critical in order to avoid the “analysis paralysis” as much as the “gut feel” approach.

    Funnel project requests into a triage system for project intake

    Info-Tech recommends following a four-step process for managing project intake.

    1. Requestor fills out form and submits the request into the funnel.
    2. Requests are triaged into the proper queue.
      1. Divert non-project request.
      2. Quickly assess value and urgency.
      3. Assign specialist to follow up on request.
      4. Inform the requestor.
    3. Business analyst starts to gather preliminary requirements.
      1. Follow up with sponsors to validate and define scope.
      2. Estimate size and determine project management rigor required.
      3. Start to develop an initial business case.
    4. Requestor is given realistic expectations for approval process.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    An excess number of intake channels is the tell-tale sign of a project portfolio in distress. The PMO needs to exercise and enforce discipline on stakeholders. PMO should demand proper documentation and diligence from stakeholders before proceeding with requests.

    Maintain reliable resourcing data with a recurrent project intake, prioritization, and approval practice

    Info-Tech recommends following a five-step process for managing project intake, prioritization, and approval.

    A diagram of Info-Tech's five-step process for managing project intake. There are four groups that may be involved in any one step, they are laid out on the side as row headers that each step's columns may fall into, 'Resources', 'Business Analysts', 'PMO', and 'Governance Layer'. The first step is 'Collect project requests' which involves 'Resources'. Step 2 is 'Screen project requests' which involves 'Business Analysts' and 'PMO'. A part of the step that may be applicable to some organizations is 'Concept approval' involving 'Governance Layer'. Step 3 is 'Develop business case' which involves 'Business Analysts' and 'PMO'. A part of the step that may be applicable to some organizations is 'Get a project sponsor' involving 'Governance Layer'. Step 4 is 'Prioritize project' which involves 'Business Analysts' and 'PMO'. Step 5 is 'Approve (greenlight) project' which involves 'Business Analysts', 'PMO', and 'Governance Layer', with an attached note that reads 'Ensure that up-to-date project portfolio information is available (project status, resource forecast, etc.)'. All of these steps lead to 'Initiate project, commit resources, etc.'

    Info-Tech Insight

    “Approval” can be a dangerous word in project and portfolio management. Use it carefully. Clarify precisely what is being “approved” at each step in the process, what is required to pass each gate, and how long the process will take.

    Determine your project intake, prioritization, and approval process maturity

    Associated Activity icon 2.1.1a – 10 minutes

    INPUT: Organizational strategy and culture

    OUTPUT: Project intake, prioritization, and approval capability level

    Materials: PPM Strategy Development Tool

    Participants: PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager, Project Managers, Resource Managers, Business Analysts

    Kick-off the discussion about the project intake, prioritization, and approval process by reading the capability level descriptions below and discussing which level currently applies to you the most.

    Capability Level Descriptions

    Capability Level 5: Optimized We have effective intake processes with right-sized administrative overhead. Work is continuously prioritized to keep up with emerging challenges and opportunities.
    Capability Level 4: Aligned We have very strong intake processes. Project approvals are based on business cases and aligned with future resource capacity.
    Capability Level 3: Engaged Processes are in place to track project requests and follow up on them. Priorities are periodically re-evaluated, based largely on the best judgment of one or several executives.
    Capability Level 2: Defined Some processes are in place, but there is no capacity to say no to new projects. There is a backlog, but little or no method for grooming it.
    Capability Level 1: Unmanaged Our organization has no formal intake processes in place. Most work is done reactively, with little ability to prioritize project work proactively.

    Benchmark the current project intake, prioritization, and approval process against strategy-aligned goals

    Associated Activity icon 2.1.1b – 1-2 hours

    INPUT: Documentation describing the current process (e.g. standard operating procedures), Process goals from activity 1.2.1

    OUTPUT: Retrospective review of current process

    Materials: 4x6” recipe cards, Whiteboard

    Participants: PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager, Project Managers, Resource Managers, Business Analysts

    Conduct a table-top planning exercise to map out the process currently in place.

    1. Use white 4”x6” recipe cards to write unique steps of a process. Use the intake, prioritization, and approval process from the previous slides as a guide.
    2. Use green cards to write artifacts or deliverables that result from a step.
    3. Use pink cards to write issues, problems, or risks.
    4. Discuss how the process could better achieve the strategy-aligned goals from activity 1.2.1. Keep a list of possible changes in the form of a start-stop-continue retrospective (example below) on a whiteboard.
    Start Stop Continue
    • Simplify business cases
    • Send emails to requestor to manage expectations
    • Accept verbal project requests
    • Approve “pet projects”
    • Monthly prioritization meetings
    • Evaluate prioritization criteria

    Set near- and long-term action items for the project intake, prioritization, and approval process

    Associated Activity icon 2.1.1c – 30 minutes - 1 hour

    INPUT: Outcome of the retrospective review, Process goals and metrics from activity 1.2.1

    OUTPUT: Action items for evolving the process to a target state

    Materials: Whiteboard

    Participants: PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager, Project Managers, Resource Managers, Business Analysts

    Analyze each item in the start-stop-continue retrospective to compile a set of near-term and long-term action items.

    The near-term plan should include steps that are within the authority of the PMO and do not require approval or investment outside of that authority. The long-term plan should include steps that may require a longer approval process, buy-in of external stakeholders, and the investment of time and money.
    Near-Term Action Items Long-Term Action Items
    For example:
    • Limit the number of channels available to request new projects.
    • Revise the intake form.
    • Establish a regular triage process.
    For example:
    • Establish a comprehensive scorecard and business case scoring process at the steering committee level.
    • Limit the rate of approval to be aligned with resource capacity.

    Review and customize slide 23, “Project intake, prioritization, and approval: action items,” in Info-Tech’s PPM Strategic Plan Template.

    Draft a high-level description of the intake, prioritization, and approval process at a target state

    Associated Activity icon 2.1.1d – 1-2 hours

    INPUT: Action items for evolving the process to a target state

    OUTPUT: High-level description of the process at the target state

    Materials: Whiteboard, PPM Strategy Development Tool

    Participants: PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager, Project Managers, Resource Managers, Business Analysts

    1. Break down the process into several tasks at a high level. Avoid getting into too much detail by limiting the number of steps.
    2. An example of high-level breakdown: project intake, prioritization, and approval
      Collect project requests –› Screen requests –› Develop business case –› Prioritize project –› Approve project

    3. Describe each task by answering the following questions. Document your response in the PPM Strategic Plan Template.
    4. Question

      Description

      Input What information do you need to perform the work?
      Output What artifacts/deliverables are produced as a result?
      Frequency/Timing How often, and when, will the work be performed?
      Responsibility Who will perform the work?
      Accountability Who will approve the work and assume the ownership of any decisions?

    5. Record the time cost of each process using the PPM Strategy Development Tool; see next slide for instructions.

    Use the PPM Strategy Development Tool to track the time cost of the process

    Supporting Tool icon 2.1.1 – PPM Strategy Development Tool, Tab 3: Costing Assumptions

    Record the time cost of each high-level process task from Activity 2.1.1d.

    Screenshot of tab 3 from Info-Tech's PPM Strategy Development Tool with notes overlaid. Columns are 'ID', 'Task Description', 'Who does the task?', a super-column titled 'Current State' which includes 'How many times per year?', 'How many people?', and 'For how long?', a super-column titled 'Near-Term Target State' with the same three sub columns, and a super-column titled 'Long-Term Target State' with the same three sub columns. Notes for 'Who does the task?' read 'Choose executive, management or resource' and 'If task is done by more than one party, duplicate the task'. Notes for the 3 recurring sub columns are 'Estimate how many times in a year the task is performed (e.g. 120 project requests per year)', 'Indicate the number of people needed to perform the task each time', 'Estimate the average work-hours for the task… either in minutes or in hours', 'If a task is not applicable to a state (e.g. currently PMO does not screen project requests), leave the row blank', and 'For meetings, remember to indicate the number of people'.

    Document the high-level description for the new intake, prioritization, and approval process

    Associated Activity icon 2.1.1e – 30 minutes - 1 hour

    INPUT: High-level description of the process at the target state

    OUTPUT: Updated PPM strategic plan

    Materials: Whiteboard, PPM Strategic Plan Template

    Participants: PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager

    Update your PPM strategic plan with the new high-level description for the new project intake, prioritization, and approval process. Depending on your current process capability level, you may wish to include additional information on your strategic document, for example:

    • Updated prioritization scorecard.
    • Roles and responsibility matrix, identifying consulted and informed parties.

    Info-Tech has a dedicated blueprint to help you develop the high-level process description into a fully operationalized process. Upon completion of this PPM strategy blueprint, speak to an Info-Tech account manager or analyst to get started.

    Read Info-Tech’s Optimize Project Intake, Prioritization, and Approval blueprint.

    Review and customize slide 24, “Project intake, prioritization, and approval: target state,” in Info-Tech’s PPM Strategic Plan Template.

    Clarity in project prioritization process leads to enterprise-wide buy-in

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Public Administration
    Source: IAG / Info-Tech Interview

    Challenge

    "Our challenge from the start was to better understand the strategic perspective and priorities of our client departments.

    In addition, much of the work requested was not aligned to corporate goals and efforts, and seemed to be contradictory, redundant, and lacking strategic focus."

    Complicating this challenge was the fact that work requests were being received via all means of communication, which made the monitoring and controlling of requests more difficult.

    Solution

    Client departments were consulted to improve the understanding of their strategic goals and priorities. Based on the consultation:

    • A new, enterprise-wide project prioritization criteria was developed.
    • Priority of project requests from all business areas are evaluated on a quarterly basis.
    • A prioritized list of projects are made available to the senior leadership team.

    Results

    "By creating and implementing a tool for departments to prioritize strategic efforts, we helped them consider the important overall project criteria and measure them uniformly, across all anticipated projects. This set a standard of assessment, prioritization, and ranking, which helped departments clearly see which efforts were supportive and matched their strategic goals."

    Resource management process ensures that projects get the resources they need

    Reclaim project capacity: properly allocate project work and establish more stable project timelines.

    Questions

    • Who assigns the resources?
    • Who feeds the data on resources?
    • How do we make sure it’s valid?
    • How do we handle contingencies when projects are late, or if availability changes?

    Benefits

    • Ensure that approved projects can be completed by aligning intake with real project capacity.
    • Reduce over-allocation of resources by allocating based on their proportion of project vs. non-project work.
    • Forecast future resource requirements by maintaining accurate resource capacity data.

    Challenges

    • Time tracking can be difficult when project workers balance project work with “keep the lights on” activities and other administrative work.
    • Continuous partial attention, interruptions, and distractions are a part of today’s reality that makes it very difficult to maximize productivity.
    A see-saw balancing 'Resource availability' on one side and 'Ongoing projects, Operational work, Administrative work, and Resource absence' on the other side.

    Maintain reliable resourcing data with a recurrent resource management practice

    Info-Tech recommends following a five-step process for resource management.

    A diagram of Info-Tech's five-step process for resource management. There are five groups that may be involved in any one step, they are laid out on the side as row headers that each step's columns may fall into, 'Resources', 'Resource Managers', 'Project Managers', 'PMO', and 'Governance Layer'. The first step is 'Collect resource availability' which involves 'Resources' and 'Resource Managers'. Step 2 is 'Collect resource demand' which involves 'Resource Managers', 'Project Managers' and 'PMO'. Step 3 is 'Identify need for reconciliation' which involves 'PMO'. Step 4 is 'Resolve conflicts and smoothen resource allocations' which involves 'Resource Managers', 'Project Managers' and 'PMO'. Step 5 is 'Report resource allocations and forecast' which involves all groups, with an attached note that reads 'Ensure that up-to-date information is available for project approval, portfolio reporting, closure, etc.'

    Info-Tech Insight

    This process aims to control the resource supply to meet the demand – project and non-project alike. Coordinate this process with the intake, approval, and prioritization process.

    Determine your resource management process capability level

    Associated Activity icon 2.1.2a – 10 minutes

    INPUT: Organizational strategy and culture

    OUTPUT: Resource management capability level

    Materials: PPM Strategy Development Tool

    Participants: PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager, Project Managers, Resource Managers, Business Analysts

    Kick-off the discussion about the resource management process by reading the capability level descriptions below and discussing which level currently applies to you the most.

    Capability Level Descriptions

    Capability Level 5: OptimizedOur organization has an accurate picture of project versus non-project work loads and allocates resources accordingly. We periodically reclaim lost capacity through organizational and behavioral change.
    Capability Level 4: AlignedWe have an accurate picture of how much time is spent on project versus non-project work. We allocate resources to these projects accordingly. We are checking in on project progress bi-weekly.
    Capability Level 3: PixelatedWe are allocating resources to projects and tracking progress monthly. We have a rough estimate of how much time is spent on project versus non-project work.
    Capability Level 2: OpaqueWe match resources teams to projects and check in annually, but we do not forecast future resource needs or track project versus non-project work.
    Capability Level 1: UnmanagedOur organization expects projects to be finished, but there is no process in place for allocating resources or tracking project progress.

    Benchmark the current resource management process against strategy-aligned goals

    Associated Activity icon 2.1.2b – 1-2 hours

    INPUT: Documentation describing the current process (e.g. standard operating procedures), Process goals from activity 1.2.1

    OUTPUT: Retrospective review of current process

    Materials: 4x6” recipe cards, Whiteboard

    Participants: PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager, Project Managers, Resource Managers, Business Analysts

    Conduct a table-top planning exercise to map out the process currently in place.

    1. Use white 4”x6” recipe cards to write unique steps of a process. Use the resource management process from the previous slides as a guide.
    2. Use green cards to write artifacts or deliverables that result from a step.
    3. Use pink cards to write issues, problems, or risks.
    4. Discuss how the process could better achieve the strategy-aligned goals from activity 1.2.1. Keep a list of possible changes in the form of a start-stop-continue retrospective (example below) on a whiteboard.
    Start Stop Continue
    • Collect project actuals
    • Make enhancements to the PPM tool in use
    • Over allocating resources
    • “Around the room” reporting at monthly meeting
    • Send project updates before resource management meetings

    Set near- and long-term action items for the resource management process

    Associated Activity icon 2.1.2c – 30 minutes - 1 hour

    INPUT: Outcome of the retrospective review, Process goals and metrics from activity 1.2.1

    OUTPUT: Action items for evolving the process to a target state

    Materials: Whiteboard

    Participants: PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager, Project Managers, Resource Managers, Business Analysts

    Analyze each item in the start-stop-continue retrospective to compile a set of near-term and long-term action items.

    The near-term plan should include steps that are within the authority of the PMO and do not require approval or investment outside of that authority. The long-term plan should include steps that may require a longer approval process, buy-in of external stakeholders, and the investment of time and money.
    Near-Term Action Items Long-Term Action Items
    For example:
    • Determine the percentage of project vs. non-project work through implementation of a weekly survey.
    For example:
    • Reduce resource waste to 6%.
    • Forecast resource requirements monthly.
    • Implement a mid-market PPM tool.

    Review and customize slide 26, “Resource management: action items,” in Info-Tech’s PPM Strategic Plan Template.

    Draft a high-level description of the resource management process at a target state

    Associated Activity icon 2.1.2d – 1-2 hours

    INPUT: Action items for evolving the process to a target state

    OUTPUT: High-level description of the process at the target state

    Materials: Whiteboard, PPM Strategy Development Tool

    Participants: PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager, Project Managers, Resource Managers, Business Analysts

    1. Break down the process into several tasks at a high level. Avoid getting into too much detail by limiting the number of steps.
    2. An example of high-level breakdown: resource management
      Collect resource availability –› Collect resource demand –› Identify need for reconciliation –› Resolve conflicts and over-allocation –› Update resource forecast


    3. Describe each task by answering the following questions. Document your response in the PPM Strategic Plan Template.
    4. Question

      Description

      Input What information do you need to perform the work?
      Output What artifacts/deliverables are produced as a result?
      Frequency/Timing How often, and when, will the work be performed?
      Responsibility Who will perform the work?
      Accountability Who will approve the work and assume the ownership of any decisions?


    5. Record the time cost of each process using the PPM Strategy Development Tool.

    Document the high-level description for the new resource management process

    Associated Activity icon 2.1.2e – 30 minutes - 1 hour

    INPUT: High-level description of the process at the target state

    OUTPUT: Updated PPM strategic plan

    Materials: PPM Strategic Plan Template

    Participants: PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager

    Update your PPM strategic plan with the new high-level description for the new resource management process. Depending on your current process capability level, you may wish to include additional information on your strategic plan, for example:

    • Resource management meeting agenda template
    • Roles and responsibility matrix, identifying consulted and informed parties

    Info-Tech has a dedicated blueprint to help you develop the high-level process description into a fully operationalized process. Upon completion of this PPM strategy blueprint, speak to an Info-Tech account manager or analyst to get started.

    Read Info-Tech’s Develop a Resource Management for the New Reality blueprint.

    Review and customize slide 27, “Resource management: target state,” in Info-Tech’s PPM Strategic Plan Template.

    Step 2.2: Develop and refine portfolio reporting, project closure, and benefits realization processes

    PHASE 1

    PHASE 2

    PHASE 3

    1.11.22.12.23.13.2
    Choose the right PPM strategyTranslate strategy into process goalsDefine intake & resource mgmt. processesDefine reporting, closure, & benefits mgmt. processesSelect a right-sized PPM solutionFinalize your PPM strategic plan

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Determine your process maturity.
    • Benchmark current processes against strategy-aligned goals.
    • Set near- and long-term action items.
    • Draft a high-level description of your target state.
    • Document your new processes.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • PMO Director/Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts

    Outcomes of this step

    • A definition of current and target state maturity levels for portfolio reporting, project closure, and benefits realization
    • Near-term and long-term process goals for portfolio reporting, project closure, and benefits realization
    • A high-level wireframe for your portfolio reporting, project closure, and benefits realization process steps

    Portfolio reporting process makes trustworthy data accessible for informing decisions

    Giving stakeholders the ability to make informed decisions is the most important function of managing the project portfolio.

    Questions

    • What project information should be reported?
    • Who reports on project status?
    • When and how do we report on the status of the project portfolio?

    Benefits

    • Reporting is the linchpin of any successful PPM strategy.
    • Timely and accurate status reports enable decision makers to address issues risks and issues before they create bigger problems.
    • Executive visibility can be achieved with or without a commercial tool using spreadsheets, a content management system such as SharePoint, or a combination of tools you already have.

    Challenges

    • Trying to increase detailed visibility too fast leads to difficulty gathering and maintaining data. As a result, reporting is rarely accurate and people quickly lose trust in the portfolio.
    • If you are planning to adopt a commercial tool, Info-Tech strongly recommends validating your organization’s ability to maintain a consistent reporting process using simple tools before investing in a more sophisticated system.

    Info-Tech Insight

    If you can only do one thing, establish frequently current reporting on project status. Reporting doesn’t have to be detailed or precise, as long as it’s accurate.

    Maintain reliable portfolio status data with a recurrent status and progress reporting practice

    Info-Tech recommends following a four-step process for portfolio status and progress reporting.

    A diagram of Info-Tech's four-step process for portfolio status and progress reporting. There are four groups that may be involved in any one step, they are laid out on the side as row headers that each step's columns may fall into, 'Resources', 'Project Managers', 'PMO', and 'Governance Layer'. The first step is 'Create project status reports' which involves 'Resources' and 'Project Managers'. Step 2 is 'Create a project portfolio status report' which involves 'Project Managers' and 'PMO', with a note that reads 'Ensure that up-to-date information is available for project approval, resource management, closure, etc.' Step 3 is 'Report on project portfolio status' which involves 'PMO' and 'Governance layer'. Step 4 is 'Act on portfolio steering decisions' which involves 'Resources', 'Project Managers' and 'PMO'.

    Start by establishing a regular reporting cadence with lightweight project status KPIs:

    Red Issue or risk that requires intervention For projects that are red or yellow, high-level status reports should be elaborated on with additional comments on budget, estimated hours/days until completion, etc.
    Yellow Issue or risk that stakeholders should be aware of
    Green No significant risks or issues

    Determine your resource management process capability level

    Associated Activity icon 2.2.1a – 10 minutes

    INPUT: Organizational strategy and culture

    OUTPUT: Portfolio reporting capability level

    Materials: PPM Strategy Development Tool

    Participants: PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager, Project Managers

    Kick-off the discussion about the portfolio reporting process by reading the capability level descriptions below and discussing which level currently applies to you the most.

    Capability Level Descriptions

    Capability Level 5: OptimizedWith the right tools, we can ensure that all projects are planned and maintained at a detailed task level with high-quality estimates, and that actual task progress is updated at least weekly.
    Capability Level 4: AlignedWe have the skills, knowledge, and resources needed to prepare a detailed cost-benefit analysis for all proposed projects. We track the progress throughout project execution.
    Capability Level 3: InterventionWith the right tools, we can ensure that project issues and risks are identified and addressed on a regular basis (e.g. at least monthly) for all projects.
    Capability Level 2: OversightWith the right tools, we can ensure that project status updates are revised on a regular basis (e.g. at least monthly) for all ongoing projects.
    Capability Level 1: ReactiveProject managers escalate issues directly with their direct supervisor or project sponsor because there is no formal PPM practice.

    Benchmark the current portfolio reporting process against strategy-aligned goals

    Associated Activity icon 2.2.1b – 1-2 hours

    INPUT: Documentation describing the current process (e.g. standard operating procedures), Process goals from activity 1.2.1

    OUTPUT: Retrospective review of current process

    Materials: 4x6” recipe cards, Whiteboard

    Participants: PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager, Project Managers

    Conduct a table-top planning exercise to map out the process currently in place.

    1. Use white 4”x6” recipe cards to write unique steps of a process. Use the portfolio reporting process from the previous slides as a guide.
    2. Use green cards to write artifacts or deliverables that result from a step.
    3. Use pink cards to write issues, problems, or risks.
    4. Discuss how the process could better achieve the strategy-aligned goals from activity 1.2.1. Keep a list of possible changes in the form of a start-stop-continue retrospective (example below) on a whiteboard.
    Start Stop Continue
    • Report on lightweight KPIs
    • Standardize the status reports
    • Project managers waiting too long before declaring a red status
    • Produce weekly project portfolio-wide report for senior leadership

    Set near- and long-term action items for the portfolio reporting process

    Associated Activity icon 2.2.1c – 30 minutes - 1 hour

    INPUT: Outcome of the retrospective review, Process goals and metrics from activity 1.2.1

    OUTPUT: Action items for evolving the process to a target state

    Materials: Whiteboard

    Participants: PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager, Project Managers

    Analyze each item in the start-stop-continue retrospective to compile a set of near-term and long-term action items.

    The near-term plan should include steps that are within the authority of the PMO and do not require approval or investment outside of that authority. The long-term plan should include steps that may require a longer approval process, buy-in of external stakeholders, and the investment of time and money.
    Near-Term Action Items Long-Term Action Items
    For example:
    • Establish a reporting process that can be consistently maintained using lightweight KPIs.
    • Provide a simple dashboard that stakeholders can use to see their project status reports at a high level.
    For example:
    • Adopt a commercial tool for maintaining consistent status reports.
    • Support the tool with training and a mandate of adoption among all users.

    Review and customize slide 29, “Portfolio reporting: action items,” in Info-Tech’s PPM Strategic Plan Template.

    Draft a high-level description of the portfolio reporting process at a target state

    Associated Activity icon 2.2.1d – 1-2 hours

    INPUT: Action items for evolving the process to a target state

    OUTPUT: High-level description of the process at the target state

    Materials: Whiteboard, PPM Strategy Development Tool

    Participants: PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager, Project Managers

    1. Break down the process into several tasks at a high level. Avoid getting into too much detail by limiting the number of steps.
    2. An example of high-level breakdown: portfolio reporting
      Create project status reports –› Create a project portfolio status report –› Report on project portfolio status –› Act on portfolio steering decisions


    3. Describe each task by answering the following questions. Document your response in the PPM Strategic Plan Template.
    4. Question

      Description

      InputWhat information do you need to perform the work?
      OutputWhat artifacts/deliverables are produced as a result?
      Frequency/TimingHow often, and when, will the work be performed?
      ResponsibilityWho will perform the work?
      AccountabilityWho will approve the work and assume the ownership of any decisions?

    5. Record the time cost of each process using the PPM Strategy Development Tool.

    Document the high-level description for the new portfolio reporting process

    Associated Activity icon 2.2.1e – 30 minutes - 1 hour

    INPUT: High-level description of the process at the target state

    OUTPUT: Updated PPM strategic plan

    Materials: PPM Strategic Plan Template

    Participants: PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager

    Update your PPM strategic plan with the new high-level description for the new portfolio reporting process. Depending on your current process capability level, you may wish to include additional information on your strategic plan, for example:

    • Updated project status report template with new KPIs.
    • Documentation of requirements for improved PPM dashboards and reports.

    Info-Tech has a dedicated blueprint to help you develop the high-level process description into a fully operationalized process. Upon completion of this PPM strategy blueprint, speak to an Info-Tech account manager or analyst to get started.

    Read Info-Tech’s Enhance PPM Dashboards and Reports blueprint.

    Review and customize slide 30, “Portfolio reporting: target state,” in Info-Tech’s PPM Strategic Plan Template.

    Streamlined status reporting improves portfolio visibility for executives, enabling data-driven steering of the portfolio

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Public Administration
    Source: IAG / Info-Tech Interview

    Challenge

    The client had no effective real-time reporting in place to summarize their work efforts. In addition, the client struggled with managing existing resources against the ability to deliver on the requested project workload.

    Existing project reporting processes were manually intensive and lacked mature reporting capabilities.

    Solution

    Through a short and effective engagement, IAG conducted surveys and facilitated interviews to identify the information needed by each stakeholder. From this analysis and industry best practices, IAG developed scorecards, dashboards, and project summary reports tailored to the needs of each stakeholder group. This integrated reporting tool was then made available on a central portal for PPM stakeholders.

    Results

    Stakeholders can access project scorecard and dashboard reports that are available at any given time.

    Resource reporting enabled the PMO to better balance client demand with available project capacity and forecast any upcoming deficiencies in resourcing that affect project delivery.

    Project closure at the portfolio level controls throughput and responsiveness of the portfolio

    Take control over projects that linger on, projects that don’t provide value, and projects that do not align with changing organizational priority.

    Questions

    • Who declares that a project is done?
    • Who validates it?
    • Who is this reported to?
    • Who terminates low-value projects?
    • How will they decide that a project is too low value to continue?

    Benefits

    • Minimize post-implementation problems by ensuring clean handoffs, with clear responsibilities for ongoing support and maintenance.
    • Drive continuous improvement by capturing and applying lessons learned.
    • Increase the project portfolio’s responsiveness to change by responding to emerging opportunities and challenges.

    Challenges

    • Completion criteria and “definition of done” need to be well defined and done so at project initiation.
    • Scope changes need to be managed and documented throughout the project.
    • Portfolio responsiveness requires deep cultural changes that will be met with confusion and resistance from some stakeholders.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Although “change in organizational priority” is the most frequently cited cause of project failure (PMI Pulse of Profession, 2017), closing projects that don’t align with organizational priority ought to be a key PPM goal. Therefore, don’t think of it as project failure; instead, think of it as PPM success.

    Maintain the health of the project portfolio with a repeatable project closure process

    Info-Tech recommends following a four-step process for project closure.

    A diagram of Info-Tech's four-step process for project closure. There are five groups that may be involved in any one step, they are laid out on the side as row headers that each step's columns may fall into, 'Resources', 'Resource Managers', 'Project Managers', 'PMO', and 'Governance Layer'. The first steps are 'Complete project' which involves 'Project Managers', and 'Terminate low value projects' which involves 'PMO' and 'Governance layer'. Step 2 is 'Validate project closure' which involves 'Project Managers' and 'PMO', with a note that reads 'This includes facilitating the project sponsor sign-off, accepting and archiving lessons learned documents, etc.' The third steps are 'Conduct post-project work' which involves 'Project Managers' and 'PMO', and 'Update resource availability' which includes 'Resource Managers'. Step 4 is 'Conduct post-implementation review' which involves all groups.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Post-implementation review checks which benefits (including those set out in the business case) have been achieved and identifies opportunities for further improvement. Without it, it can be difficult to demonstrate that investment in a project was worthwhile.

    Determine your project closure process capability level

    Associated Activity icon 2.2.2a – 10 minutes

    INPUT: Organizational strategy and culture

    OUTPUT: Project closure capability level

    Materials: PPM Strategy Development Tool

    Participants: PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager, Project Managers, Business Analysts

    Kick-off the discussion about the project closure process by reading the capability level descriptions below and discussing which level currently applies to you the most.

    Capability Level Descriptions

    Capability Level 5: OptimizedProject closure is centrally managed and supports post-project benefits tracking.
    Capability Level 4: AlignedProject closure is centrally managed at the portfolio level to ensure completion/acceptance criteria are satisfied.
    Capability Level 3: EngagedProject closure is confirmed at the portfolio level, but with minimal enforcement of satisfaction of completion/acceptance criteria.
    Capability Level 2: EncouragedProject managers often follow handoff and closure procedures, but project closure is not confirmed or governed at the portfolio level.
    Capability Level 1: UnmanagedProject closure is not governed at either the project or portfolio level.

    Benchmark the current project closure process against strategy-aligned goals

    Associated Activity icon 2.2.2b – 1-2 hours

    INPUT: Documentation describing the current process (e.g. standard operating procedures), Process goals from activity 1.2.1

    OUTPUT: Retrospective review of current process

    Materials: 4x6” recipe cards, Whiteboard

    Participants: PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager, Project Managers, Business Analysts

    Conduct a table-top planning exercise to map out the process currently in place.

    1. Use white 4”x6” recipe cards to write unique steps of a process. Use the project closure process from the previous slides as a guide.
    2. Use green cards to write artifacts or deliverables that result from a step.
    3. Use pink cards to write issues, problems, or risks.
    4. Discuss how the process could better achieve the strategy-aligned goals from activity 1.2.1. Keep a list of possible changes in the form of a start-stop-continue retrospective (example below) on a whiteboard.
    Start Stop Continue
    • Conduct reprioritization of projects at a regular cadence
    • Prune projects every year
    • Waive post-implementation review for time-constrained projects
    • Collect project post-mortem reports and curate in PMO SharePoint

    Set near- and long-term action items for the project closure process

    Associated Activity icon 2.2.2c – 30 minutes - 1 hour

    INPUT: Outcome of the retrospective review, Process goals and metrics from activity 1.2.1

    OUTPUT: Action items for evolving the process to a target state

    Materials: Whiteboard

    Participants: PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager, Project Managers, Resource Managers, Business Analysts

    Analyze each item in the start-stop-continue retrospective to compile a set of near-term and long-term action items.

    The near-term plan should include steps that are within the authority of the PMO and do not require approval or investment outside of that authority. The long-term plan should include steps that may require a longer approval process, buy-in of external stakeholders, and the investment of time and money.
    Near-Term Action Items Long-Term Action Items
    For example:
    • Begin establishing project closure criteria in the project initiation process.
    • Manage and document scope changes throughout the project.
    For example:
    • Institute a formal process to ensure that all projects are closed at the portfolio level and properly handed off to support and maintenance teams.

    Review and customize slide 32, “Project closure: action items,” in Info-Tech’s PPM Strategic Plan Template.

    Draft a high-level description of the project closure process at a target state

    Associated Activity icon 2.2.2d – 1-2 hours

    INPUT: Action items for evolving the process to a target state

    OUTPUT: High-level description of the process at the target state

    Materials: Whiteboard, PPM Strategy Development Tool

    Participants: PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager, Project Managers, Resource Managers, Business Analysts

    1. Break down the process into several tasks at a high level. Avoid getting into too much detail by limiting the number of steps.
    2. An example of high-level breakdown: project closure
      Complete or terminate projects –› Validate project closure –› Conduct post-project work –› Conduct post-implementation review


    3. Describe each task by answering the following questions. Document your response in the PPM Strategic Plan Template.
    4. Question

      Description

      Input What information do you need to perform the work?
      Output What artifacts/deliverables are produced as a result?
      Frequency/Timing How often, and when, will the work be performed?
      Responsibility Who will perform the work?
      Accountability Who will approve the work and assume the ownership of any decisions?


    5. Record the time cost of each process using the PPM Strategy Development Tool.

    Document the high-level description for the new project closure process

    Associated Activity icon 2.2.2e – 30 minutes - 1 hour

    INPUT: High-level description of the process at the target state

    OUTPUT: Updated PPM strategic plan

    Materials: PPM Strategic Plan Template

    Participants: PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager

    Update your PPM strategic plan with the new high-level description for the new project closure process. Depending on your current process capability level, you may wish to include additional information on your strategic plan, for example:

    • Updated project closure checklist.
    • Project value review meeting process document.
    • Post-implementation review process document.

    Info-Tech has several research notes that elaborate on aspects of project closure. Upon completion of this PPM strategy blueprint, speak to an Info-Tech account manager or analyst to get started.

    Read Info-Tech’s research notes on project closure:

    • The Importance of Conducting a Post Implementation Review
    • Five Key Steps to Mastering Project Closure
    • ‘Governance’ Will Kill Your Projects

    Review and customize slide 33, “Project closure: target state,” in Info-Tech’s PPM Strategic Plan Template.

    Validate the time and effort spent on projects with a benefits realization process

    Maximizing benefits from projects is the primary goal of PPM. Tracking and reporting on benefits post-project closes the loop on benefits.

    Questions

    • How do validate the project benefits from the original business case?
    • How do we track the benefits?
    • Who reports it? When?

    Benefits

    • Maximize benefits realization by identifying and addressing unforeseen issues or limitations to success.
    • Improve project approval and prioritization by improving validity of the business case definition process.

    Challenges

    • Project sponsors need to be willing to invest time – months and years post-project completion – to validate benefits realization.
    • Portfolio management needs to proactively work with sponsors to facilitate benefits tracking.
    • Business cases need to be well developed and documented to reflect real anticipated benefits.

    Too many projects fail to achieve the originally proposed benefits, and too few organizations are able to identify and address the root causes of those shortfalls.

    Info-Tech Insight

    In reality, benefits realization process extends across the entire project life cycle: during intake, during the execution of the project, and after project completion. Be mindful of this extended scope when you discuss benefits realization in the following activity.

    Keep project benefits front and center with a repeatable benefits realization process

    Info-Tech recommends following a four-step process for benefits realization.

    A diagram of Info-Tech's four-step process for benefits realization. There are four groups that may be involved in any one step, they are laid out on the side as row headers that each step's columns may fall into, 'Business Analysts', 'Project Managers', 'PMO', and 'Governance Layer'. The first step is 'Quantify and validate benefits in business case' which happens 'Before Project' and involves 'Business Analysts' and 'Project Managers'. Step 2 is 'Update projected project benefits' which happens 'During Project' and involves 'Project Managers' and 'PMO'. Step 3 is 'Hand-off benefits realization ownership' which happens at the end of project and involves 'Project Managers', 'PMO' and 'Governance layer'. Step 4 is 'Monitor and report on benefits' which happens 'After Project' and involves 'PMO' and 'Governance layer'.

    Info-Tech Insight

    At the heart of benefits realization is accountability: who is held accountable for projects that don’t realize the benefits and how? Without the buy-in from the entire executive layer team, addressing this issue is very difficult.

    Determine your benefits realization process capability level

    Associated Activity icon 2.2.3a – 10 minutes

    INPUT: Organizational strategy and culture

    OUTPUT: benefits realization capability level

    Materials: PPM Strategy Development Tool

    Participants: PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager, Project Managers, Resource Managers, Business Analysts

    Kick-off the discussion about the benefits realization process by reading the capability level descriptions below and discussing which level currently applies to you the most.

    Capability Level Descriptions

    Capability Level 5: OptimizedProject sponsors and key stakeholders are accountable for stated project benefits before, during and after the project. There is a process to maximize the realization of project benefits.
    Capability Level 4: AlignedProject benefits are forecasted and taken into account for approval, updated when changes are made to the project, and monitored/reported after projects are completed.
    Capability Level 3: EngagedProject benefits are forecasted and taken into account for approval, and there is a loosely defined process to report on benefits realization.
    Capability Level 2: DefinedProject benefits are forecasted and taken into account for approval, but there is no process to monitor whether the said benefits are realized.
    Capability Level 1: UnmanagedProjects are approved and initiated without discussing benefits.

    Benchmark the current benefits realization process against strategy-aligned goals

    Associated Activity icon 2.2.3b – 1-2 hours

    INPUT: Documentation describing the current process (e.g. standard operating procedures), Process goals from activity 1.2.1

    OUTPUT: Retrospective review of current process

    Materials: 4x6” recipe cards, Whiteboard

    Participants: PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager, Project Managers, Resource Managers, Business Analysts

    Conduct a table-top planning exercise to map out the process currently in place.

    1. Use white 4”x6” recipe cards to write unique steps of a process. Use the benefits realization process from the previous slides as a guide.
    2. Use green cards to write artifacts or deliverables that result from a step.
    3. Use pink cards to write issues, problems, or risks.
    4. Discuss how the process could better achieve the strategy-aligned goals from activity 1.2.1. Keep a list of possible changes in the form of a start-stop-continue retrospective (example below) on a whiteboard.
    StartStopContinue
    • Require “hard monetary value” in business benefits
    • Send project updates before resource management meetings

    Set near- and long-term action items for the benefits realization process

    Associated Activity icon 2.2.3c – 30 minutes - 1 hour

    INPUT: Outcome of the retrospective review, Process goals and metrics from activity 1.2.1

    OUTPUT: Action items for evolving the process to a target state

    Materials: Whiteboard

    Participants: PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager, Project Managers, Resource Managers, Business Analysts

    Analyze each item in the start-stop-continue retrospective to compile a set of near-term and long-term action items.

    The near-term plan should include steps that are within the authority of the PMO and do not require approval or investment outside of that authority. The long-term plan should include steps that may require a longer approval process, buy-in of external stakeholders, and the investment of time and money.
    Near-Term Action Items Long-Term Action Items
    For example:
    • Create an “orientation for project sponsors” document.
    • Encourage project managers to re-validate project benefits on an ongoing basis and report any deviation.
    For example:
    • Recruit the finance department’s help in benefits tracking.
    • Require Finance’s sign-off on project benefits in business cases during intake.

    Review and customize slide 35, “Benefits realization: action items,” in Info-Tech’s PPM Strategic Plan Template.

    Draft a high-level description of the benefits realization process at a target state

    Associated Activity icon 2.2.3d – 1-2 hours

    INPUT: Action items for evolving the process to a target state

    OUTPUT: High-level description of the process at the target state

    Materials: Whiteboard, PPM Strategy Development Tool

    Participants: PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager, Project Managers, Resource Managers, Business Analysts

    1. Break down the process into several tasks at a high level. Avoid getting into too much detail by limiting the number of steps.
    2. An example of high-level breakdown: benefits realization
      Validate benefits in business case –› Update project benefits during execution –› Hand-off benefits ownership –› Monitor and report on benefits


    3. Describe each task by answering the following questions. Document your response in the PPM Strategic Plan Template.
    4. Question

      Description

      InputWhat information do you need to perform the work?
      OutputWhat artifacts/deliverables are produced as a result?
      Frequency/TimingHow often, and when, will the work be performed?
      ResponsibilityWho will perform the work?
      AccountabilityWho will approve the work and assume the ownership of any decisions?

    5. Record the time cost of each process using the PPM Strategy Development Tool.

    Document the high-level description for the new benefits realization process

    Associated Activity icon 2.2.3e – 30 minutes - 1 hour

    INPUT: High-level description of the process at the target state

    OUTPUT: Updated PPM strategic plan

    Materials: PPM Strategic Plan Template

    Participants: PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager

    Update your PPM strategic plan with the new high-level description for the new benefits realization process. Depending on your current process capability level, you may wish to include additional information on your strategic plan, for example:

    • Updated business plan templates.
    • Communication plan for project sponsors.

    Info-Tech has a dedicated blueprint to help you develop the high-level process description into a fully operationalized process. Upon completion of this PPM strategy blueprint, speak to an Info-Tech account manager or analyst to get started.

    Read Info-Tech’s Establish the Benefits Realization Process blueprint.

    Review and customize slide 36, “Benefits realization: target state,” in Info-Tech’s PPM Strategic Plan Template.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech Workshop Associated Activity icon

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    Photo of Barry Cousins.
    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analyst will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech's historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    Sample of activity 2.1.1 'Align your project intake, prioritization, and approval process to the PPM strategy'. Align your project intake, prioritization, and approval process to the PPM strategy

    Examine the process at the current state and develop an action plan to improve it, with a high-level description of the process at a target state and its overhead costs. The outcome of this activity feeds into the overall PPM strategic plan.

    Sample of activity 2.1.2 'Align your resource management process to the PPM strategy'. Align your resource management process to the PPM strategy

    Examine the process at the current state and develop an action plan to improve it, with a high-level description of the process at a target state and its overhead costs. The outcome of this activity feeds into the overall PPM strategic plan.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech Workshop Associated Activity icon

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    Sample of activity 2.2.1 'Align your portfolio reporting process to the PPM strategy'.Align your portfolio reporting process to the PPM strategy

    Examine the process at the current state and develop an action plan to improve it, with a high-level description of the process at a target state and its overhead costs. The outcome of this activity feeds into the overall PPM strategic plan.

    Sample of activity 2.2.2 'Align your project closure process to the PPM strategy'.Align your project closure process to the PPM strategy

    Examine the process at the current state and develop an action plan to improve it, with a high-level description of the process at a target state and its overhead costs. The outcome of this activity feeds into the overall PPM strategic plan.

    Sample of activity 2.2.3 'Align your benefits realization process to the PPM strategy'.Align your benefits realization process to the PPM strategy

    Examine the process at the current state and develop an action plan to improve it, with a high-level description of the process at a target state and its overhead costs. The outcome of this activity feeds into the overall PPM strategic plan.

    Develop a Project Portfolio Management Strategy

    PHASE 3

    Complete Your PPM Strategic Plan

    Phase 2 outline

    Associated Activity icon Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 3: Complete your PPM strategic plan

    Proposed Time to Completion: 2 weeks
    Step 3.1: Select a right-sized PPM solutionStep 3.2: Finalize your PPM Strategic Plan Template
    Work with an analyst to:
    • Assess your PPM tool requirements to help support your processes.
    Review findings with analyst:
    • Determine the costs and potential benefits of your PPM strategy.
    Then complete these activities…
    • Determine the functionality requirements of the PPM solution.
    • Estimate your PPM tool budget.
    • Review the tool assessment.
    Then complete these activities…
    • Estimate the total cost-in-use of managing the project portfolio.
    • Estimate the benefits of the PPM strategy.
    • Refine and consolidate the near-term action items into a cohesive implementation plan.
    With these tools & templates:
    • PPM Strategy Development Tool
    With these tools & templates:
    • PPM Strategy Development Tool
    • PPM Strategic Plan Template

    Phase 3 Insight:

    • Approach PPM as an evolving discipline that requires adaptability and long-term organizational change. Near-term process improvements should create stakeholder desire for better portfolio visibility and agility over the long term.

    Step 3.1: Select a right-sized PPM solution for supporting your new processes

    PHASE 1

    PHASE 2

    PHASE 3

    1.11.22.12.23.13.2
    Choose the right PPM strategyTranslate strategy into process goalsDefine intake & resource mgmt. processesDefine reporting, closure, & benefits mgmt. processesSelect a right-sized PPM solutionFinalize your PPM strategic plan

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Determine the functionality requirements of a PPM solution in the near and long terms.
    • Estimate your PPM tool budget.
    • Review tool assessment.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • IT Managers

    Outcomes of this step

    • List of functional requirements for a PPM solution
    • An estimate budget and cost for supporting a PPM tool in the near and long terms
    • PPM tool requirements for the near and long terms

    Right-size your PPM solution/tool to fit your PPM processes

    Avoid a common pitfall: the disconnect between PPM processes and PPM tools.

    PPM tools act as both a receptacle for portfolio data generated by your processes and a source of portfolio data to drive your processes forward. Therefore, choosing a suitable PPM tool is critical to the success of your PPM strategy:

    • PPM tool inputs must match the type, level of detail, and amount of portfolio data generated by your PPM processes.
    • PPM tool outputs must be useful, insightful, easy to access, and easy to understand for people who engage in your PPM processes.

    User adoption is an often cited cause of failed PPM tool implementation:

    "The biggest problem is getting the team to work with the tool. We need to make sure that we’re not wasting time delving too far down into the tool, yet putting enough information to get useful information back." (IT Director, Financial Services)

    This final step of the blueprint will discuss the choice of PPM tools to ensure the success of PPM strategy by avoiding the process-tool disconnect.

    Common pitfalls for PPM tools

    • Purchasing and implementing a PPM tool before the process is defined and accepted.
    • Poor expectation setting: inability of tools to perform the necessary analysis.
    • Underleveraged: low user/process adoption.
    • Poor integration with the corporate finance function.
    • (WGroup, 2017)

    Leverage PPM tools to get the information you need

    An optimized PPM solution is the vehicle that provides decision makers with four key pieces of information they require when making decisions for your project portfolio:

    • Historical Insight – inform decision makers about how much time and resources have been spent to date, and benchmark the accuracy of prior project estimates and resource allocations.
    • Forecasting – provide a trustworthy estimate of demand on resources and current projects.
    • Portfolio Analytics – analyze portfolio data and generate easy-to-consume reports that provide answers to questions such as:
      • How big is our overall portfolio?
      • How much money/resource time is available?
      • How efficiently are we using our resources?
    • Project Visibility – provide a trustworthy report on the status of current projects and the resources working on them.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Without the proper information, decision makers are driving blind and are forced to make gut feel decisions as opposed to data-informed decisions. Implement a PPM solution to allocate projects properly and ensure time and money don’t vanish without being accounted for.

    Commercial PPM tools have more functionality but are more costly, complex, and difficult to adopt

    • Granular timesheet management
    • Workflow and team collaboration
    • Robust data and application integration
    • Advanced what-if planning
    • Mobile usability
    A map comparing commercial PPM tools by 'Functionality', 'Cost', and 'Difficulty to implement/adopt'. 'Functionality' and 'Difficulty to implement/adopt' share an axis and can be assumed to have a linear relationship. 'Spreadsheets' are low functionality and low cost. 'Google Sites' are low to middling functionality and low cost. 'SharePoint' is middling functionality with a slightly higher cost. The next three start at middling cost and above-average functionality and trend higher in both categories: 'Commercial Entry-Level PPM', 'Commercial Mid-Market PPM', and 'Commercial Enterprise PPM'.
    • Business case scoring and prioritization
    • Multi-user reporting and request portal
    • High-level resource management
    • Project status, cost, and risk tracking

    "Price tags [for PPM tools] vary considerably. Expensive products don't always provide more capability. Inexpensive products are generally low cost for good reason." (Merkhofer)

    Your PPM tool options are not limited to commercial offerings

    Despite the rapid growth in the commercial PPM tool market today, homegrown approaches like spreadsheets and intranet sites continue to be used as PPM tools.

    Kinds of PPM solutions used by Info-Tech clients

    A pie chart visualizing the kinds of PPM solutions that are used by Info-Tech clients. There are three sections, the largest of which is 'Spreadsheet-based, 46%', then 'Commercial, 33%', then 'No solution, 21%'. (Source: Info-Tech Research Group (2016), N=433)

    Category

    Characteristics

    PPM maturity

    Enterprise tool
    • Higher professional services requirements for enterprise deployment
    • Larger reference customers
    High
    Mid-market tool
    • Lower expectation of professional services engaged in initial deployment contract
    • Fewer globally recognizable reference clients
    • Faster deployments
    High
    Entry-level tool
    • Lower cost than mid-market & enterprise PPM tools
    • Limited configurability, reporting, and resource management functionalities
    • Compelling solutions to the organizations that wants to get a fast start to a trial deployment
    Intermediate
    Spreadsheet based
    • Little/no up-front cost, highly customizable to suit your organization’s needs
    • Varying degrees of sophistication
    • Few people in the organization may understand the logic behind the tool; knowledge may not be easily transferrable
    Intermediate Low

    Determine the functional requirements of the PPM solution

    Associated Activity icon 3.1.1 – 20 minutes

    INPUT: PPM strategic plan

    OUTPUT: Modified PPM strategic plan with a proposed choice of PPM tool

    Materials: PPM Strategy Development Tool

    Participants: PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager, Project Managers, IT Managers

    Use the Tool Assessment tab (tab 4) of Info-Tech’s PPM Strategy Development Tool to rate and analyze functional requirements of your PPM solution.

    • Review the list of PPM features provided on column B of tab 4. You can add any desired features not listed.
    • Rate your near-term and long-term feature requirements using the drop-down menus in columns C and D. Your selections here will inform the tool selection bubble chart to the right of the features list.

    Screenshot showing the features list on tab 4 of the PPM Strategy Development Tool.

    Estimate your PPM tool budget

    Associated Activity icon 3.1.2 – 20 minutes

    INPUT: PPM strategic plan

    OUTPUT: Modified PPM strategic plan with a proposed choice of PPM tool

    Materials: PPM Strategy Development Tool

    Participants: CIO, PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager, Project Managers, IT Managers

    Enter the PPM tool budget information on the Tool Assessment tab of Info-Tech’s PPM Strategy Development Tool.

    • As a starting point, it can help to know that low-priced PPM tools cost around $1,000 per user per year. High-priced PPM tools cost around $3,000 per user per year.
    • Software-as-a-Service (SaaS)-based pricing for PPM solutions is increasingly popular. If you plan to purchase perpetual licensing, divide the total implementation and licensing cost by three years to be comparable with a three-year SaaS total cost of ownership analysis.

    Screenshot showing the tool assessment from the PPM Strategy Development Tool with 'Near-Term' and 'Long-Term' budget columns. Notes include 'Enter the number of fully licensed PPM users you expect to provision for and your estimated annual budget for a PPM tool', 'The tool assessment automatically calculates your annual budget per user, which is reflected in the bubble chart analysis (see next slide)'.

    Review the tool assessment graphic

    Associated Activity icon 3.1.3 – 20 minutes

    The map comparing commercial PPM tools from before, this time overlaid with 'Near-Term' and 'Long-Term' budgets as coloured circles. The vertical axis is 'Functionality Rating' and the horizontal axis is now 'Annual Cost/Budget per User'. 'Spreadsheets' are low functionality and low cost. 'Google Sites' are low to middling functionality and low cost. 'SharePoint' is middling functionality with a slightly higher cost. The 'Near-Term' budget circle covers those three tools. The next three start at middling cost and above-average functionality and trend higher in both categories: 'Commercial Entry-Level PPM', 'Commercial Mid-Market PPM', and 'Commercial Enterprise PPM'. The 'Long-Term' budget circle covers 'Commercial Mid-Market PPM'.

    If you are in one of the non-covered areas, consider revisiting your functional requirements and PPM strategy. You may need to lessen your expectations to be able to stay within your budget, or find a way to get more money.

    Keep in mind that the long-term goal can be to work towards a commercial tool, while the short-term goal would be to be able to maintain your portfolio in a simple spreadsheet first.

    Info-Tech Insight

    If you choose a commercial solution, you will need to gain executive buy-in in order to implement the tool; proceed to near-term and long-term plans to get the ball rolling on this decision.

    Review and customize slide 37, “Tools for PPM: proposed near- and long-term solutions,” in Info-Tech’s PPM Strategic Plan Template.

    Grow your own, or select and implement, a PPM solution with Info-Tech

    Whether you choose spreadsheet-based or commercially available PPM solutions, use Info-Tech’s research for scoping, designing, and implementing them.

    Info-Tech’s Grow Your Own PPM Solution blueprint will help you implement a highly evolved spreadsheet-based PPM solution. It features the Portfolio Manager 2017, a Microsoft Excel-based workbook that leverages its business intelligence features to provide a basis for implementing a scalable, highly customizable PPM tool with useful and easy-to-manipulate analytics.

    Read Info-Tech’s Grow Your Own PPM Solution blueprint.

    Info-Tech’s Select and Implement a PPM Solution blueprint is part of our Vendor Landscape research. Make sense of the diversity of PPM solutions available in today’s market, and choose the most appropriate solutions for your organization’s size and level of PPM maturity.

    Read Info-Tech’s Select and Implement a PPM Solution blueprint.

    A right-sized PPM strategy leads to a right-sized portfolio management tool based on Info-Tech’s template

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Energy
    Source: Info-Tech Client

    “The approach makes it easy to run the portfolio without taking time away from the project themselves.” (IT Manager, Energy Resources Firm)

    Situation

    • A small IT department struggled with balancing project work with ongoing operational management and support work.
    • The department includes experienced and successful project managers and a mature, skilled team.
    • However, the nature of the department’s role has evolved to the point where the project and operational work demands have exceeded the available time.
    • Prioritization needed to become more centralized and formalized while management control of the work assignments became increasingly decentralized.

    Complication

    • Agile projects offer clear advantages by lightening the requirement for proactive planning. However, getting the staff to adapt would be challenging because of the overall workload and competing priorities.
    • Some of the team’s time needed to be carefully tracked and reported for time & materials-based billing, but the time sheet system was unsuited to their portfolio management needs.
    • Commercial PPM systems were ruled out because strict task management seemed unlikely to gain adoption.

    Resolution

    • The team deployed Info-Tech’s Project Portfolio Workbook, based on a Microsoft Excel template, and the Grow Your Own PPM Solution blueprint.
    • For the first time, executive leadership was given a 12-month forecast of resource capacity based on existing and pending project commitments. The data behind the capacity forecast was based on allocating people to projects with a percentage of their time for each calendar month.
    • The data behind the forecast is high level but easily maintainable.

    Step 3.2: Finalize customizing your PPM Strategic Plan Template

    PHASE 1

    PHASE 2

    PHASE 3

    1.11.22.12.23.13.2
    Choose the right PPM strategyTranslate strategy into process goalsDefine intake & resource mgmt. processesDefine reporting, closure, & benefits mgmt. processesSelect a right-sized PPM solutionFinalize your PPM strategic plan

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Determine the costs of support your PPM strategic plan.
    • Estimate some of the benefits of your PPM strategic plan.
    • Perform a cost-benefit analysis.
    • Refine and consolidate the near-term action items into a cohesive plan.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • IT Managers

    Outcomes of this step

    • A cost/benefit analyst
    • An implementation action plan
    • A finalized PPM Strategic Plan Template

    Estimate the total cost-in-use of managing the project portfolio

    Supporting Tool icon 3.2.1 – PPM Strategy Development Tool, Tab 5: Costing Summary

    The time cost of PPM processes (tab 3) and PPM tool costs (tab 4) are summarized in this tab. Enter additional data to estimate the total PPM cost-in-use: the setup information and the current cost of PPM software tools.

    Screenshot of the PPM Strategy Development Tool, Tab 5: Costing Summary. Notes include 'If unknown, the overall HR budget of your project portfolio can be estimated as: (# FTEs) * (fully-loaded FTE cost per hour) * 1800', 'This is your total PPM cost-in-use'.

    Estimate the benefits of managing the project portfolio

    Supporting Tool icon 3.2.2 – PPM Strategy Development Tool, Tab 6: Benefits Assumptions

    The benefits of PPM processes are estimated by projecting the sources of waste on your resource capacity.

    1. Estimate the current extent of waste on your resource capacity. If you have completed Info-Tech’s PPM Current Score Scorecard, enter the data from the report.
    2. Screenshot of a Waste Assessment pie chart from the PPM Strategy Development Tool, Tab 6: Benefits Assumptions.
    3. Given your near- and long-term action items for improving PPM processes, estimate how each source of waste on your resource capacity will change.
    4. Screenshot of a Waste Assessment table titled 'These inputs represent the percentage of your overall portfolio budget that is wasted in each scenario' from the PPM Strategy Development Tool, Tab 6: Benefits Assumptions.

    Review the cost-benefit analysis results and update the PPM Strategic Plan Template

    Supporting Tool icon 3.2.3 – PPM Strategy Development Tool, Tab 7: Conclusion Screenshot of a 'PPM Strategy Cost-Benefit Analysis' from the PPM Strategy Development Tool, Tab 7: Conclusion. It has tables on top and bar charts underneath.

    This tab summarizes the costs and benefits of your PPM strategic plan.

    • Costs are estimated from wasted project capacity and time spent on PPM process work.
    • Benefits are estimated from the project capacity to be reclaimed as a result of improvements in PPM.
    • Return on investment is calculated by dividing the value of project capacity to be reclaimed by investment in PPM in addition to the current-state cost.

    Capture this summary in your PPM strategic plan.

    Customize slides 40 and 41, “Return on PPM investment,” in Info-Tech’s PPM Strategic Plan Template.

    Determine who will be responsible for coordinating the flow, collection, and reporting of portfolio data

    Supporting Tool icon 3.2.3 – Project Portfolio/PMO Analyst Job Description

    You will need to determine responsibilities and accountabilities for portfolio management functions within your team.

    If you do not have a clearly identifiable portfolio manager at this time, you will need to clarify who will wear which hats in terms of facilitating intake and prioritization, high-level capacity awareness, and portfolio reporting.

    • Use Info-Tech’s Project Portfolio Analyst Job Description Template to help clarify some of the required responsibilities to support your PPM strategy.
      • If you need to bring in an additional staff member to help support the strategy, you can customize the job description template to help advertise the position. Simply edit the text in grey within the template.
    • If you have other PPM tasks that you need to define responsibilities for, you can use the RASCI chart on the final tab of the PPM Strategy Develop Tool.

    Download Info-Tech’s Project Portfolio Analyst Job Description Template.

    Sample of Info-Tech's Project Portfolio Analyst Job Description Template.

    Refine and consolidate the near-term action items into a cohesive plan

    Associated Activity icon 3.2.4 – 30 minutes

    INPUT: Near-term action items

    OUTPUT: Near-term action plan

    Materials: PPM Strategy Development Tool

    Participants: PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager, Project Managers, Resource Managers, Business Analysts

    Collect the near-term action items for each of the five PPM processes and arrange them into a table that outlines the near-term action plan. Once it is compiled, adjust the timeline and responsibility so that the plan is coherent and realistic as a whole.

    Example:

    Outcome

    Action required

    Timeline

    Responsibility

    Determine the percentage distribution of project vs. non-project work Run a time audit survey with all project resources 2 weeks Resource managers
    Test a simple dashboard for project status Pilot Info-Tech’s Portfolio Manager 2017 workbook 2 weeks PMO Director

    "There is a huge risk of taking on too much too soon, especially with the introduction of specific tools and tool sets. There is also an element of risk involved that can lead to failure and disappointment with PPM if these tools are not properly introduced and supported." (Jim Carse, Director of the Portfolio Office, Queen’s University)

    Review and customize slide 43, “Summary of near-term action plan,” in Info-Tech’s PPM Strategic Plan Template.

    Finalize and publish your PPM strategic plan

    Table of Contents

    Read over the document to ensure its completeness and consistency.

    At this point, you have a PPM strategic plan that is actionable and realistic, which addresses the goals set by the senior leadership.

    The executive brief establishes the need for PPM strategy, the goals and metrics are set by members of the senior leadership that gave the initial buy-in, and the target states of PPM processes that meet those goals are described. Finally, the costs and benefits of the improved PPM practice are laid out in a way that can be validated.

    The next step for your PPM strategy is to use this document as a foundation for implementing and operationalizing the target-state PPM processes.

    Review and publish the document for your executive layer and key project stakeholders. Solicit their feedback.

    Info-Tech has a library of blueprints that will guide you through each of the five processes. Contact your Info-Tech account manager or Info-Tech analyst to get started.

    • Project Portfolio Management Strategy
      • Strategic Expectations
      • Overview
    • Leadership Mandate
    • Project Demand and Resource Supply
    • The Current State of Resource Utilization
    • PPM Processes
      • Project intake, prioritization, and approval
      • Resource management
      • Portfolio reporting
      • Project closure
      • Benefits realization
      • Tools for PPM
    • The Economic Impact of PPM
    • PPM Strategy Next Steps

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech Workshop Associated Activity icon

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    Photo of Barry Cousins.
    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analyst will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech's historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    Sample of activity 3.1 'Scope the right-sized PPM solution for your PPM strategy'. Scope the right-sized PPM solution for your PPM strategy

    Use the PPM Strategy Development Tool to quickly determine our near- and long-term recommendation for your PPM solution.

    Sample of activity 3.2 'Conduct a cost-benefit analysis of your PPM strategic plan'. Conduct a cost-benefit analysis of your PPM strategic plan

    Using the time cost estimates of each process and the requirement for a PPM tool, Info-Tech helps you quantify the overhead costs of PPM and estimate the monetary benefits of reclaimed project capacity for your project portfolio.

    Insight breakdown

    Insight 1

    • Executive layer buy-in is a critical prerequisite for the success of a top-down PPM strategy. Ensure your executives are on board before preceding to implement your PPM strategy.

    Insight 2

    • The means of project and portfolio management (i.e. processes) shouldn’t eclipse the ends – strategic goals. Root your process in your PPM strategic goals to realize PPM benefits (e.g. optimized portfolio value, improved project throughput, increased stakeholder satisfaction).

    Insight 3

    • Without the proper information, decision makers are driving blind and are forced to make gut-feel decisions as opposed to data-informed decisions. Implement a PPM solution to allocate projects properly and ensure time and money don’t vanish without being accounted for.

    Summary of accomplishment

    Knowledge Gained

    • Info-Tech’s thought model on PPM processes that create an infrastructure around projects
    • Your current state of project portfolio: project capacity vs. project demand
    • Importance of gaining executive buy-in for installing the PPM practice

    Processes Optimized

    • Project intake, prioritization, and approval process
    • Resource management process
    • Portfolio reporting process
    • Project closure process
    • Benefits realization process

    Deliverables Completed

    • Choice of PPM strategy and the leadership mandate
    • Analysis of current project capacity and demand
    • PPM process goals and metrics, aligned to meet PPM strategic expectations
    • PPM process capability levels
    • Retrospective examination of current state, near/long-term action items for improvement, and high-level descriptions of the five PPM processes
    • Recommendation of PPM tools to support the processes
    • Estimate of PPM overhead costs
    • Cost-benefit analysis of PPM practice
    • PPM strategic plan

    Related Info-Tech Research

    • Develop a Project Portfolio Management Strategy
    • Grow Your Own PPM Solution
    • Optimize Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization
    • Develop a Resource Management Strategy for the New Reality
    • Manage a Minimum-Viable PMO
    • Establish the Benefits Realization Process
    • Manage an Agile Portfolio
    • Establish the Benefits Realization Process
    • Project Portfolio Management Diagnostic Program
      The Project Portfolio Management Diagnostic Program is a low-effort, high-impact program designed to help project owners assess and improve their PPM practices. Gather and report on all aspects of your PPM environment in order to understand where you stand and how you can improve.

    Research contributors and experts

    Photo of Kiron D. Bondale PMP, PMI-RMP, CDAP, CDAI, Senior Project Portfolio Management Professional Kiron D. Bondale PMP, PMI-RMP, CDAP, CDAI
    Senior Project Portfolio Management Professional

    Kiron has worked in the project management domain for more than fifteen years managing multiple projects, leading Project Management Offices (PMO) and providing project portfolio management consulting services to over a hundred clients across multiple industries. He has been an active member of the Project Management Institute (PMI) since 1999 and served as a volunteer director on the Board of the PMI Lakeshore Chapter for six years. Kiron has published articles on project and project portfolio management in multiple journals and has delivered over a hundred webinar presentations on a variety of PPM and PM topics and has presented at multiple industry conferences. Since 2009, Kiron has been blogging on a weekly basis on project management topics and responds to questions daily in the LinkedIn PMI Project, Program and Portfolio Management discussion group.

    Photo of Shaun Cahill, Project Manager, Queen’s University Shaun Cahill, Project Manager &
    Jim Carse, Director of the Project Portfolio Office
    Queen’s University

    Research contributors and experts

    Photo of Amy Fowler Stadler, Managing Partner, Lewis Fowler Amy Fowler Stadler, Managing Partner
    Lewis Fowler

    Amy has more than 20 years of experience in business and technology, most recently owning her own management consulting firm since 2002, focused on business transformation, technology enablement, and operational improvement. Prior to that, she was at CenturyLink (formerly Qwest) as an IT Director, Perot Systems in various roles, and Information Handling Services, Inc. as a Software Development Product Manager.

    Amy holds a bachelor’s degree in Computer Science with a minor in Business Communications and is also a 2015 Hall of Fame inductee to Illinois State University College of Applied Science and Technology.

    Photo of Rick Morris, President, R2 Consulting LLC Rick Morris, President
    R2 Consulting LLC

    Rick A. Morris, PMP, is a certified Scrum Agile Master, Human Behavior Consultant, best-selling author, mentor, and evangelist for project management. Rick is an accomplished project manager and public speaker. His appetite for knowledge and passion for the profession makes him an internationally sought after speaker delivering keynote presentations for large conferences and PMI events around the world. He holds the PMP (Project Management Professional), MPM (Masters of Project Management), Scrum Agile Master, OPM3, Six Sigma Green Belt, MCITP, MCTS, MCSE, TQM, ATM-S, ITIL, and ISO certifications, and is a John Maxwell Certified Speaker, Mentor, and Coach. Rick is the Owner of R2 Consulting, LLC and has worked for organizations such as GE, Xerox, and CA, and has consulted with numerous clients in a wide variety of industries including financial services, entertainment, construction, non-profit, hospitality, pharmaceutical, retail, and manufacturing.

    Research contributors and experts

    Photo of Terry Lee Ricci PgMP, PfMP, PMP, PPM Practice Lead, IAG Consulting Terry Lee Ricci PgMP, PfMP, PMP, PPM Practice Lead
    IAG Consulting

    Terry is passionate and highly skilled at PMO transformation, developing high-performing teams that sustain long-term business results. Terry has a reputation built upon integrity, resourcefulness, and respect. She has the vision to implement long and short-term strategies, meeting both current and evolving business needs.

    Change Management/Business transformation: Terry has extensive background in PMO strategy development aligned to corporate goals. Many years in the PMO organization integration/transformation building or overhauling programs and processes.

    Governance: Terry loves to monitor and measure performance and outcomes and uses her collaborative style to successfully bring simplicity to complexity (technology – people – process). Performance optimization results are easy to use and clearly define who is doing what across functions. End results consistently align to business strategy while mitigating risks effectively.

    Comprehensive: A “through the ranks” executive with a comprehensive understanding of PMO operations, high-performance teams, and the respective business units they support.

    Photo of Alana Ruckstuhl MSc, IT Project Officer, Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario Alana Ruckstuhl MSc, IT Project Officer
    Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario

    Research contributors and experts

    Photo of Jay Wardle, Director of the PMO, Red Wing Shoes Co. Jay Wardle, Director of the PMO
    Red Wing Shoes Co.
    Photo of Bob White, Vice President/Chief Information Officer, ALM Holding Company Bob White, Vice President/Chief Information Officer
    ALM Holding Company

    As vice president and chief information officer for ALM Holding Company, Bob White directs all technology activity and support for three main verticals: road construction, energy management, and delivery and transportation. He has been with ALM Holding Company for one and a half years, focusing on PPM process improvement, cybersecurity initiatives, and IT service management.

    Prior to joining ALM, Bob was executive vice president/chief information officer at Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. where he led the strategic direction, implementation, and management of information technology throughout the company’s global operations. Bob has also held VP/CIO positions at the Stride Rite Corporation and Timex Corporation.

    Bob holds a Master’s degree in Operations Management from the University of Arkansas and a Bachelor of Science degree in Industrial Engineering from Southern Illinois University.

    Bibliography

    Bersin, Josh. “Time to Scrap Performance Appraisals?” Forbes Magazine, 5 June 2013. Web. 30 Oct 2013.

    Cheese, Peter et al. “Creating an Agile Organization.” Accenture, Oct. 2009. Web. Nov. 2013.

    Croxon, Bruce et al. “Dinner Series: Performance Management with Bruce Croxon from CBC's 'Dragon's Den'” HRPA Toronto Chapter. Sheraton Hotel, Toronto, ON. 12 Nov. 2013. Panel discussion.

    Culbert, Samuel. “10 Reasons to Get Rid of Performance Reviews.” Huffington Post Business, 18 Dec. 2012. Web. 28 Oct. 2013.

    Denning, Steve. “The Case Against Agile: Ten Perennial Management Objections.” Forbes Magazine, 17 Apr. 2012. Web. Nov. 2013.

    Estis, Ryan. “Blowing up the Performance Review: Interview with Adobe’s Donna Morris.” Ryan Estis & Associates, 17 June 2013. Web. Oct. 2013.

    Gallup, Inc. “Gallup Study: Engaged Employees Inspire Company Innovation.” Gallup Management Journal, 12 Oct. 2006. Web. 12 Jan 2012.

    Gartside, David et al. “Trends Reshaping the Future of HR.” Accenture, 2013. Web. 5 Nov. 2013.

    KeyedIn Solutions. “Why PPM and PMOs Fail.” KeyedIn Projects, 2013. Ebook.

    Lessing, Lawrence. Free Culture. Lulu Press Inc.: 30 July 2016.

    Merkhofer, Lee. “Keys to Implementing Project Portfolio Management.” Lee Merkhofer Consulting, 2017.

    Perry, Mark Price. Business Driven Project Portfolio Management. J Ross Pub: 17 May 2011.

    Project Management Institute. “Pulse of the Profession 2015: Capturing the Value of Project Management.” PMI, Feb. 2015. Web.

    Project Management Institute. “Pulse of the Profession 2016: The High Cost of Low Performance.” PMI, 2016. Web.

    Project Management Institute. “Pulse of the Profession 2017: Success Rates Rise.” PMI, 2017. Web.

    Project Management Institute. The Standard for Portfolio Management – Third Edition. PMI: 1 Dec. 2012.

    WGroup. “Common Pitfalls in Project Portfolio Management – Part 2.” WGroup, 24 Jan. 2017. Web.

    Build Effective Enterprise Integration on the Back of Business Process

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}360|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Enterprise Integration
    • Parent Category Link: /enterprise-integration
    • Organizations undergoing growth, either organically or through M&A, tend to develop integration capabilities in a piecemeal and short-sighted fashion to preserve their view of agility.
    • Integration strategies that are focused solely on technological solutions are likely to complicate rather than simplify, as not enough consideration is given to how other systems and processes will be impacted.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Define a path for your EI strategy. Establish the more pressing goal of enterprise integration: improving operational integrity or adding business intelligence/predictive analytics capability.
    • Combine multiple views of integration for a comprehensive EI strategy. Assess business process, applications, and data in tandem to understand where enterprise integration will fit in your organization.
    • Don’t start by boiling the ocean and get bogged down in mapping out the entire organization. For the purposes of the strategy, narrow your focus to a set of related high-value processes to identify ways to improve integration.

    Impact and Result

    • Begin your enterprise strategy formation by identifying if your organization places emphasis on enabling operational excellence or predictive modeling/analytics.
    • Enterprise integration needs to bring together business process, applications, and data, in that order. Kick-start the process of identifying opportunities for improvement by creating business process maps that incorporate how applications and data are coordinated to support business activities.
    • Revisit the corporate drivers after integration mapping activities to identify the primary use cases for improvement.
    • Prepare for the next steps of carrying out the strategy by reviewing a variety of solution options.
    • Develop a compelling business case by consolidating the outputs of your mapping activities, establishing metrics for a specific process (or set of processes), and quantifying the benefits.

    Build Effective Enterprise Integration on the Back of Business Process Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should create an enterprise integration strategy; review Info-Tech’s methodology that encompasses business process, applications, and data; and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Position enterprise integration within the organization

    Begin strategy development by assigning roles and responsibilities for the team and establishing the initial direction for the strategy.

    • Build Effective Enterprise Integration on the Back of Business Process – Phase 1: Position Enterprise Integration Within Your Organization
    • Chief Enterprise Integration Officer
    • Enterprise Integration Strategy Drivers Assessment

    2. Explore the lenses of enterprise integration

    Create business process maps that incorporate how applications and data are coordinated to support business activities.

    • Build Effective Enterprise Integration on the Back of Business Process – Phase 2: Explore the Lenses of Enterprise Integration
    • Enterprise Integration Process Mapping Tool

    3. Develop the enterprise integration strategy

    Review your integration map to identify improvement opportunities, explore integration solutions, and consolidate activity outputs into a strategy presentation.

    • Build Effective Enterprise Integration on the Back of Business Process – Phase 3: Develop the Enterprise Integration Strategy
    • Enterprise Integration Strategy Presentation Template
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Build Effective Enterprise Integration on the Back of Business Process

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Position Enterprise Integration

    The Purpose

    Discuss the general approach for creating a holistic enterprise integration strategy.

    Define the initial direction and drivers.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Strategy development team with responsibilities identified.

    Clear initial direction for the strategy based on senior stakeholder input.

    Activities

    1.1 Define the driving statements for your EI strategy.

    1.2 Develop a RACI chart.

    1.3 Discuss the current state of enterprise integration.

    1.4 Establish the initial direction of your strategy by surveying senior stakeholders.

    Outputs

    Vision, mission, and values for enterprise integration

    RACI chart for strategy development

    Documentation of past integration projects

    Chief Enterprise Integration Officer job description template

    2 Explore the Lenses of Enterprise Integration

    The Purpose

    Build a comprehensive map of what integration looks like for your target business processes.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Clear documentation of the integration environment, encompassing process, data, and applications.

    Activities

    2.1 Develop level-0 and level-1 business capability diagrams.

    2.2 Identify the business processes of focus, based on relevance to overall corporate drivers.

    2.3 Complete process flow diagrams.

    2.4 Begin identifying the applications that are involved in each step of your process.

    2.5 Detail the connections/interactions between the applications in your business processes.

    2.6 Draw a current state diagram for application integration.

    2.7 Identify the data elements created, used, and stored throughout the processes, as well as systems of record.

    Outputs

    Business capability maps

    Business process flow diagrams

    Current state integration diagram

    Completed integration map

    3 Develop the Enterprise Integration Strategy

    The Purpose

    Review the outputs of the integration mapping activities.

    Educate strategy team on the potential integration solutions.

    Consolidate the findings of the activities into a compelling strategy presentation.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Integration improvement opportunities are identified.

    Direction and drivers for enterprise integration are finalized.

    Understanding of the benefits and limitations of some integration solutions.

    Activities

    3.1 Discuss the observations/challenges and opportunities for improvement.

    3.2 Refine the focus of the strategy by conducting a more detailed stakeholder survey.

    3.3 Review the most common integration solutions for process, applications, and data.

    3.4 Create a future state integration architecture diagram.

    3.5 Define the IT and business critical success factors for EI.

    3.6 Articulate the risks with pursuing (and not pursuing) an EI strategy.

    3.7 Quantify the monetary benefits of the EI strategy.

    3.8 Discuss best practices for presenting the strategy and organize the presentation content.

    Outputs

    Critical success factors and risks for enterprise integration

    Monetary benefits of enterprise integration

    Completed enterprise integration strategy presentation

    Operations management

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}12|cart{/j2store}
    • Related Products: {j2store}12|crosssells{/j2store}
    • Up-Sell: {j2store}12|upsells{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 10.0/10
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Infra and Operations
    • Parent Category Link: /infra-and-operations
    IT Operations is all about effectiveness. We make sure that you deliver reliable services to the clients and users within the company.

    Microsoft Teams Cookbook

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}408|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 8.8/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $6,299 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 27 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: DR and Business Continuity
    • Parent Category Link: /business-continuity

    Remote work calls for leveraging your Office 365 license to use Microsoft Teams – but IT is unsure about best practices for governance and permissions. Moreover, IT has few resources to help train end users with Teams best practices.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Microsoft Teams is not a standalone app. Successful utilization of Teams occurs when conceived in the broader context of how it integrates with Office 365. Understanding how information flows between Teams, SharePoint Online, and OneDrive for Business, for instance, will aid governance with permissions, information storage, and file sharing.

    Impact and Result

    Use Info-Tech’s Microsoft Teams Cookbook to successfully implement and use Teams. This cookbook includes recipes for:

    • IT best practices concerning governance of the creation process and Teams rollout.
    • End-user best practices for Teams functionality and common use cases.

    Microsoft Teams Cookbook Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Learn critical insights for an effective Teams rollout.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    • Microsoft Teams Cookbook – Sections 1-2

    1. Teams for IT

    Understand best practices for governance of the Teams creation process and Teams rollout.

    • Microsoft Teams Cookbook – Section 1: Teams for IT

    2. Teams for end users

    Get end users on board with this series of how-tos and common use cases for Teams.

    • Microsoft Teams Cookbook – Section 2: Teams for End Users

    [infographic]

     

    Further reading

    Microsoft Teams Cookbook

    Recipes for best practices and use cases for Microsoft Teams.

    Table of contents

    Executive Brief

    Section 1: Teams for IT

    Section 2: Teams for End Users

    Executive Summary

    Situation

    Remote work calls for leveraging your Office 365 license to utilize Teams – but IT is unsure about best practices for governance and permissions.

    Without a framework or plan for governing the rollout of Teams, IT risks overlooking secure use of Teams, the phenomenon of “teams sprawl,” and not realizing how Teams integrates with Office 365 more broadly.

    Complication

    Teams needs to be rolled out quickly, but IT has few resources to help train end users with Teams best practices.

    With teams, channels, chats, meetings, and live events to choose from, end users may get frustrated with lack of guidance on how to use Teams’ many capabilities.

    Resolution

    Use Info-Tech’s Microsoft Teams Cookbook to successfully implement and utilize Teams. This cookbook includes recipes for:

    • IT best practices concerning governance of the creation process and Teams rollout.
    • End-user best practices for Teams functionality and common use cases.

    Key Insights

    Teams is not a standalone app

    Successful utilization of Teams occurs when conceived in the broader context of how it integrates with Office 365. Understanding how information flows between Teams, SharePoint Online, and OneDrive for Business, for instance, will aid governance with permissions, information storage, and file sharing.

    IT should paint the first picture for team creation

    No initial governance for team creation can lead to “teams sprawl.” While Teams was built to allow end users’ creativity to flow in creating teams and channels, this can create problems with a cluttered interface and keeping track of information. To prevent end-user dissatisfaction here, IT’s initial Teams rollout should offer a basic structure for end users to work with first, limiting early teams sprawl.

    The Teams admin center can only take you so far with permissions

    Knowing how Teams integrates with other Office 365 apps will help with rolling out sensitivity labels to protect important information being accidentally shared in Teams. Of course, technology only does so much – proper processes to train and hold people accountable for their actions with data sharing must be implemented, too.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Establish a Communication and Collaboration System Strategy

    Don’t waste your time deploying yet another collaboration tool that won’t get used.

    Modernize Communication and Collaboration Infrastructure

    Your legacy telephony infrastructure is dragging you down – modern communications and collaboration technology will dramatically improve productivity.

    Migrate to Office 365 Now

    One small step to cloud, one big leap to Office 365. The key is to look before you leap.

    Section 1: Teams for IT

    Governance best practices and use cases for IT

    Section 1

    Teams for IT

    Section 2

    Teams for end users

    From determining prerequisites to engaging end users.

    IT fundamentals
    • Creation process
    • Teams rollout
    Use cases
    • Retain and search for legal/regulatory compliance
    • Add an external user to a team
    • Delete/archive a team

    Overview: Creation process

    IT needs to be prepared to manage other dependent services when rolling out Teams. See the figure below for how Teams integrates with these other Office 365 applications.

    A flow chart outlining how Teams integrates with other Office 365 applications. Along the side are different applications, from the top: 'Teams client', 'OneDrive for Business', 'Sharepoint Online', 'Planner (Tasks for Teams)', 'Exchange Online', and 'Stream'. Along the top are services of 'Teams client', 'Files', 'Teams', 'Chat', 'Meeting', and 'Calls'.

    Which Microsoft 365 license do I need to access Teams?

    • Microsoft 365 Business Essentials
    • Microsoft 365 Business Premium
    • Office 365 Enterprise, E1, E3, or E5
    • Office 365 Enterprise E4 (if purchased prior to its retirement)

    Please note: To appeal to the majority of Info-Tech’s members, this blueprint refers to Teams in the context of Office 365 Enterprise licenses.

    Assign admin roles

    You will already have at least one global administrator from setting up Office 365.

    Global administrators have almost unlimited access to settings and most of the data within the software, so Microsoft recommends having only two to four IT and business owners responsible for data and security.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Configure multifactor authentication for your dedicated Office 365 global administrator accounts and set up two-step verification.

    Once you have organized your global administrators, you can designate your other administrators with “just-enough” access for managing Teams. There are four administrator roles:

    Teams Service Administrator Manage the Teams service; manage and create Microsoft 365 groups.
    Teams Communications Administrator Manage calling and meetings features with Teams.
    Teams Communications Support Engineer Troubleshoot communications issues within Teams using the advanced troubleshooting toolset.
    Teams Communications Support Specialist Troubleshoot communications issues using Call Analytics.

    Prepare the network

    There are three prerequisites before Teams can be rolled out:

    • UDP ports 3478 through 3481 are opened.
    • You have a verified domain for Office 365.
    • Office 365 has been rolled out, including Exchange Online and SharePoint Online.

    Microsoft then recommends the following checklist to optimize your Teams utilization:

    • Optimize calls and performance using the Call Quality Dashboard.
    • Assess network requirements in the Network Planner in the Teams admin center.
    • Ensure all computers running Teams client can resolve external DNS queries.
    • Check adequate public IP addresses are assigned to the NAT pools to prevent port exhaustion.
    • Route to local or regional Microsoft data centers.
    • Whitelist all Office 365 URLs to move through security layers, especially IDS/IPS.
    • Split tunnel Teams traffic so it bypasses your organization’s VPN.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    For online support and walkthroughs, utilize Advisor for Teams. This assistant can be found in the Teams admin center.

    Team Creation

    You can create and manage Teams through the Teams PowerShell module and the Teams admin center. Only the global administrator and Teams service administrator have full administrative capabilities in this center.

    Governance over team creation intends to prevent “teams sprawl” – the phenomenon whereby end users create team upon team without guidance. This creates a disorganized interface, with issues over finding the correct team and sharing the right information.

    Prevent teams sprawl by painting the first picture for end users:

    1. Decide what kind of team grouping would best fit your organization: by department or by project.
    2. Start with a small number of teams before letting end users’ creativity take over. This will prevent initial death by notifications and support adoption.
    3. Add people or groups to these teams. Assign multiple owners for each team in case people move around at the start of rollout or someone leaves the organization.
    4. Each team has a general channel that cannot be removed. Use it for sharing an overview of the team’s goals, onboarding, and announcements.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    For smaller organizations that are project-driven, organize teams by projects. For larger organizations with established, siloed departments, organize by department; projects within departments can become channels.

    Integrations with SharePoint Online

    Teams does not integrate with SharePoint Server.

    Governance of Teams is important because of how tightly it integrates with other Office 365 apps, including SharePoint Online.

    A poor rollout of Teams will have ramifications in SharePoint. A good rollout will optimize these apps for the organization.

    Teams and SharePoint integrate in the following ways:

    • Each team created in Teams automatically generates a SharePoint team site behind it. All documents and chat shared through a team are stored in that team’s SharePoint document library.
    • As such, all files shared through Teams are subject to SharePoint permissions.
    • Existing SharePoint folders can be tied to a team without needing to create a new one.
    • If governance over resource sharing in Teams is poor, information can get lost, duplicated, or cluttered throughout both Teams and SharePoint.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    End users should be encouraged to integrate their teams and channels with existing SharePoint folders and, where no folder exists, to create one in SharePoint first before then attaching a team to it.

    Permissions

    Within the Teams admin center, the global or Teams service administrator can manage Teams policies.

    Typical Teams policies requiring governance include:

    • The extent end users can discover or create private teams or channels
    • Messaging policies
    • Third-party app use

    Chosen policies can be either applied globally or assigned to specific users.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    If organizations need to share sensitive information within the bounds of a certain group, private channels help protect this data. However, inviting users into that channel will enable them to see all shared history.

    External and guest access

    Within the security and compliance center, the global or Teams service administrator can set external and guest access.

    External access (federation) – turned on by default.

    • Lets you find, call, and chat with users in other domains. External users will have no access to the organization’s teams or team resources.

    Guest access – turned off by default.

    • Lets you add individual users with their own email address. You do this when you want external users to access teams and team resources. Approved guests will be added to the organization’s active directory.

    If guest access is enabled, it is subject to Azure AD and Office 365 licensing and service limits. Guests will have no access to the following, which cannot be changed:

    • OneDrive for Business
    • An organization’s calendar/meetings
    • PSTN
    • Organization’s hierarchical chart
    • The ability to create, revise, or browse a team
    • Upload files to one-on-one chat

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Within the security and compliance center, you can allow users to add sensitivity labels to their teams that can prevent external and guest access.

    Expiration and archiving

    To reduce the number of unused teams and channels, or delete information permanently, the global or Teams service administrator can implement an Office 365 group expiration and archiving policy through the Teams admin center.

    If a team has an expiration policy applied to it, the team owner will receive a notification for team renewal 30 days, 15 days, and 1 day before the expiry date. They can renew their team at any point within this time.

    • To prevent accidental deletion, auto-renewal is enabled for a team. If the team owner is unable to manually respond, any team that has one channel visit from a team member before expiry is automatically renewed.
    • A deleted Office 365 group is retained for 30 days and can be restored at any point within this time.

    Alternatively, teams and their channels (including private) can be archived. This will mean that all activity for the team ceases. However, you can still add, remove, and update roles of the members.

    Retention and data loss prevention

    Retention policies can be created and managed in the Microsoft 365 Compliance Center or the security and compliance center PowerShell cmdlets. This can be applied globally or to specific users.

    By default, information shared through Teams is retained forever.

    However, setting up retention policies ensures data is retained for a specified time regardless of what happens to that data within Teams (e.g. user deletes).

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    To prevent external or guest users accessing and deleting sensitive data, Teams is able to block this content when shared by internal users. Ensure this is configured appropriately in your organization:

    • For guest access in teams and channels
    • For external access in meetings and chat

    Please note the following limitations of Teams’ retention and data loss prevention:

    • Organization-wide retention policies will need to be manually inputted into Teams. This is because Teams requires a retention policy that is independent of other workloads.
    • As of May 2020, retention policies apply to all information in Teams except private channel messages. Files shared in private channels, though, are subject to retention policies.
    • Teams does not support advanced retention settings, such as a policy that pertains to specific keywords or sensitive information.
    • It will take three to seven days to permanently delete expired messages.

    Teams telephony

    Teams has built-in functionality to call any team member within the organization through VoIP.

    However, Teams does not automatically connect to the PSTN, meaning that calling or receiving calls from external users is not immediately possible.

    Bridging VoIP calls with the PSTN through Teams is available as an add-on that can be attached to an E3 license or as part of an E5 license.

    There are two options to enable this capability:

    • Enable Phone System. This allows for call control and PBX capabilities in Office 365.
    • Use direct routing. You can use an existing PSTN connection via a Session Border Controller that links with Teams (Amaxra).

    Steps to implement Teams telephony:

    1. Ensure Phone System and required (non-Microsoft-related) services are available in your country or region.
    2. Purchase and assign Phone System and Calling Plan licenses. If Calling Plans are not available in your country or region, Microsoft recommends using Direct Routing.
    3. Get phone numbers and/or service numbers. There are three ways to do this:
      • Get new numbers through the Teams admin center.
      • If you cannot get new numbers through the Teams admin center, you can request new numbers from Microsoft directly.
      • Port or transfer existing numbers. To do this, you need to send Microsoft a letter of authorization, giving them permission to request and transfer existing numbers on your behalf.
    4. To enable service numbers, including toll-free numbers, Microsoft recommends setting up Communications Credits for your Calling Plans and Audio Conferencing.

    Overview: Teams rollout

    1. From Skype (and Slack) to Teams
    2. Gain stakeholder purchase
    3. Employ a phased deployment
    4. Engage end users

    Skype for Business is being retired; Microsoft offers a range of transitions to Teams.

    Combine the best transition mode with Info-Tech’s adoption best practices to successfully onboard and socialize Teams.

    From Skype to Teams

    Skype for Business Online will be retired on July 31, 2021. Choose from the options below to see which transition mode is right for your organization.

    Skype for Business On-Premises will be retired in 2024. To upgrade to Teams, first configure hybrid connectivity to Skype for Business Online.

    Islands mode (default)

    • Skype for Business and Teams coexist while Teams is rolled out.
    • Recommended for phased rollouts or when Teams is ready to use for chat, calling, and meetings.
    • Interoperability is limited. Teams and Skype for Business only transfer information if an internal Teams user sends communications to an external Skype for Business user.

    Teams only mode (final)

    • All capabilities are enabled in Teams and Skype for Business is disabled.
    • Recommended when end users are ready to switch fully to Teams.
    • End users may retain Skype for Business to join meetings with non-upgraded or external parties. However, this communication is only initiated from the Skype for Business external user.

    Collaboration first mode

    • Skype for Business and Teams coexist, but only Teams’ collaboration capabilities are enabled. Teams communications capabilities are turned off.
    • Recommended to leverage Skype for Business communications yet utilize Teams for collaboration.

    Meetings first mode

    • Skype for Business and Teams coexist, but only Teams’ meetings capabilities are enabled.
    • Recommended for organizations that want to leverage their Skype for Business On-Premises’ Enterprise Voice capability but want to benefit from Teams’ meetings through VoIP.

    From Slack to Teams

    The more that’s left behind in Slack, the easier the transition. As a prerequisite, pull together the following information:

    • Usage statistics of Slack workspaces and channels
    • What apps end users utilize in Slack
    • What message history you want to export
    • A list of users whose Slack accounts can map on to required Microsoft accounts
    Test content migration

    Your Slack service plan will determine what you can and can’t migrate. By default, public channels content can be exported. However, private channels may not be exportable, and a third-party app is needed to migrate Direct Messages.

    Files migration

    Once you have set up your teams and channels in Teams, you can programmatically copy files from Slack into the target Teams channel.

    Apps migration

    Once you have a list of apps and their configurations used in Slack’s workspaces, you can search in Teams’ app store to see if they’re available for Teams.

    User identity migration

    Slack user identities may not map onto a Microsoft account. This will cause migration issues, such as problems with exporting text content posted by that user.

    Follow the migration steps to the right.

    Importantly, determine which Slack workspaces and channels should become teams and channels within Teams.

    Usage statistics from Slack can help pinpoint which workspaces and channels are redundant.

    This will help IT paint an ordered first picture for new Teams end users.

    1. Create teams and channels in Teams
    2. Copy files into Teams
    3. Install apps, configure Office 365 Connecters
    4. Import Slack history
    5. Disable Slack user accounts

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Avoid data-handling violations. Determine what privacy and compliance regulations (if any) apply to the handling, storage, and processing of data during this migration.

    Gain stakeholder purchase

    Change management is a challenging aspect of implementing a new collaboration tool. Creating a communication and adoption plan is crucial to achieving universal buy-in for Teams.

    To start, define SMART objectives and create a goals cascade.

    Specific Measurable Actionable Realistic Time Bound
    Make sure the objective is clear and detailed. Objectives are `measurable` if there are specific metrics assigned to measure success. Metrics should be objective. Objectives become actionable when specific initiatives designed to achieve the objective are identified. Objectives must be achievable given your current resources or known available resources. An objective without a timeline can be put off indefinitely. Furthermore, measuring success is challenging without a timeline.
    Who, what, where, why? How will you measure the extent to which the goal is met? What is the action-oriented verb? Is this within my capabilities? By when: deadline, frequency?

    Sample list of stakeholder-specific benefits from improving collaboration

    Stakeholder Driver Benefits
    Senior Leadership Resource optimization Increased transparency into IT operational costs.
    Better ability to forecast hardware, resourcing costs.
    All employees Increasing productivity Apps deployed faster.
    Issues fixed faster.
    Easier access to files.
    Able to work more easily offsite.
    LBU-HR, legal, finance Mitigating risk Better able to verify compliance with external regulations.
    Better understanding of IT risks.
    Service desk Resource optimization Able to resolve issues faster.
    Fewer issues stemming from updates.
    Tier 2 Increasing productivity Less time spent on routine maintenance.

    Use these activities to define what pain points stakeholders face and how Teams can directly mitigate those pain points.

    (Source: Rationalize Your Collaboration Tools (coming soon), Activities: 3.1C – 3.1D)

    Employ a phased deployment

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Deploy Teams over a series of phases. As such, if you are already using Skype for Business, choose one of the coexistence phases to start.

      1. Identify and pilot Teams with early adopters that will become your champions. These champions should be formally trained, be encouraged to help and train their colleagues, and be positively reinforced for their efforts.
      2. Iron out bugs identified with the pilot group and train middle management. Enterprise collaboration tool adoption is strongly correlated with leadership adoption.
        1. Top-level management
          Control and direct overall organization.
        2. Middle management
          Execute top-level management’s plans in accordance with organization’s norms.
        3. First-level management
          Execute day-to-day activities.
      3. Use Info-Tech’s one-pager marketing template to advertise the new tool to stakeholders. Highlight how the new tool addresses specific pain points. Address questions stemming from fear and uncertainty to avoid employees’ embarrassment or their rejection of the tool.
    A screenshot of Info-Tech's one-pager marketing template.
    1. Extend the pilot to other departments and continue this process for the whole organization.

    (Source: Rationalize Your Collaboration Tools (coming soon), Tools:GANTT Chart and Marketing Materials, Activities: 3.2A – 3.2B)

    Info-Tech Insight

    Be in control of setting and maintaining expectations. Aligning expectations with reality and the needs of employees will lower onboarding resistance.

    Engage end users

    Short-term best practices

    Launch day:
    • Hold a “lunch and learn” targeted training session to walk end users through common use cases.
    • Open a booth or virtual session (through Teams!) and have tool representatives available to answer questions.
    • Create a game to get users exploring the new tool – from scavenger hunts to bingo.
    Launch week:
    • Offer incentives for using the tool and helping others, including small gift cards.
    • Publicize achievements if departments hit adoption milestones.

    Long-term best practices

    • Make available additional training past launch week. End users should keep learning new features to improve familiarity.
    • Distribute frequent training clips, slowly exposing end users to more complex ways of utilizing Teams.
    • Continue to positively reinforce and recognize those who use Teams well. This could be celebrating those that help others use the tool, how active certain users are, and attendance at learning events.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Microsoft has a range of training support that can be utilized. From instructor-led training to “Coffee in the Cloud” sessions, leverage all the support you can.

    Use case #1: Retain and search data for legal/regulatory compliance

    Scenario:

    Your organization requires you to retain data and documents for a certain period of time; however, after this period, your organization wishes to delete or archive the data instead of maintaining it indefinitely. Within the timeframe of the retention policy, the admin may be asked to retrieve information that has been requested through a legal channel.

    Purpose:
    • Maintain compliance with the legal and regulatory standards to which the organization is subject.
    Jobs:
    • Ensure the data is retained for the approved time period.
    • Ensure the policy applies to all relevant data and users.
    Solution: Retention Policies
    • Ensure that your organization has an Office 365 E3 or higher license.
    • Set the desired retention policy through the Security & Compliance Center or PowerShell by deciding which teams, channels, chats, and users the policies will apply to and what will happen once the retention period ends.
    • Ensure that matching retention policies are applied to SharePoint and OneDrive, since this is where files shared in Teams are stored.
    • Be aware that Teams retention policies cannot be applied to messages in private channels.
    Solution: e-Discovery
    • If legally necessary, place users or Teams on legal hold in order to retain data that would be otherwise deleted by your organization’s retention policies.
    • Perform e-discovery on Teams messages, files, and summaries of meetings and calls through the Security & Compliance Center.
    • See Microsoft’s chart on the next slide for what is e-discoverable.

    Content subject to e-discovery

    Content type eDiscoverable Notes
    Teams chat messages Yes Chat messages from chats where guest users are the only participants in a 1:1 or 1:N chat are not e-discoverable.
    Audio recordings No  
    Private channel messages Yes  
    Emojis, GIFs, stickers Yes  
    Code snippets No  
    Chat links Yes  
    Reactions (likes, hearts, etc) No  
    Edited messages Yes If the user is on hold, previous versions of edited messages are preserved.
    Inline images Yes  
    Tables Yes  
    Subject Yes  
    Quotes Yes Quoted content is searchable. However, search results don’t indicate that the content was quoted.
    Name of channel No  

    E-discovery does not capture audio messages and read receipts in MS Teams.

    Since files shared in private channels are stored separately from the rest of a team, follow Microsoft’s directions for how to include private channels in e-discovery. (Source: “Conduct an eDiscovery investigation of content in Microsoft Teams,” Microsoft, 2020.)

    Use case #2: Add external person to a team

    Scenario:

    A team in your organization needs to work in an ongoing way with someone external to the company. This user needs access to the relevant team’s work environment, but they should not be privy to the goings-on in the other parts of the organization.

    Jobs:

    This external person needs to be able to:

    • Attend meetings
    • Join calls
    • Chat with individual team members
    • View and collaborate on the team’s files
    Solution:
    • If necessary, set a data loss prevention policy to prevent your users from sharing certain types of information or files with external users present in your organization’s Teams chats and public channels.
    • Ensure that your Microsoft license includes DLP protection. However:
      • DLP cannot be applied to private channel messages.
      • DLP cannot block messages from external Skype for Business users nor external users who are not in “Teams only” mode.
    • Ensure that you have a team set up for the project that you wish the external user to join. The external user will be able to see all the channels in this team, unless you create a private channel they are restricted from.
    • Complete Microsoft’s “Guest Access Checklist” to enable guest access in Teams, if it isn’t already enabled.
    • As admin, give the external user guest access through the Teams admin center or Azure AD B2B collaboration. (If given permission, team owners can also add guests through the Teams client).
    • Decide whether to set a policy to monitor and audit external user activity.

    Use case #3: Delete/archive a team

    Scenario:

    In order to avoid teams sprawl, organizations may want IT to periodically delete or archive unused teams within the Teams client in order to improve the user interface.

    Alternately, if you are using a project-based approach to organizing Teams, you may wish to formalize a process to archive a team once the project is complete.

    Delete:
    • Determine if the team owner anticipates the team will need to be restored one day.
    • Ensure that deletion does not contradict the organization’s retention policy.
    • If not, proceed with deletion. Find the team in the Teams admin center and delete.
    • Restore a deleted team within 30 days of its initial deletion through PowerShell.
    Archive:
    • Determine if the team owner anticipates the team will need to be restored one day.
    • Find the relevant team in the Teams admin center and change its status to “Archived.”
    • Restore the archived team if the workspace becomes relevant once again.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Remind end users that they can hide teams or channels they do not wish to see in their Teams interface. Knowing a team can be hidden may impact a team owner’s decision to delete it.

    Section 2: Teams for End Users

    Best practices for utilizing teams, channels, chat, meetings, and live events

    Section 1

    Teams for IT

    Section 2

    Teams for end users

    From Teams how-tos to common use cases for end users.

    End user basics
    • Teams, channels, and chat
    • Meetings and live events
    Common use cases: Workspaces
    • WS#1: Departments
    • WS#2: A cross-functional committee
    • WS#3: An innovation day event
    • WS#4: A non-work-related social event
    • WS#5: A project team with a defined end time
    Common use cases: Meetings
    • M#1: Job interview with an external candidate
    • M#2: Quarterly board meeting
    • M#3: Weekly recurring team meeting
    • M#4: Morning stand-up/scrum
    • M#5: Phone call between two people

    Overview: Teams, channels, and chat

    Teams

    • Team: A workspace for a group of collaborative individuals.
      • Public channel: A focused area where all members of a team can meet, communicate, and share ideas and content.
      • Private channel: Like a public channel but restricted to a subset of team members, defined by channel owner.

    Chat

    • Chat: Two or more users collected into a common conversation thread.
    (Source: “Overview of teams and channels in Microsoft Teams,” Microsoft, 2020.)

    For any Microsoft Teams newcomer, the differences between teams, channels, and chat can be confusing.

    Use Microsoft’s figure (left) to see how these three mediums differ in their role and function.

    Best practices: Workspaces 1/2

      Team
    A workspace for a group of collaborative individuals.
    Public Channel
    A focused area where all members of a team can meet, communicate, and share ideas and content.
    Private Channel
    Like a public channel but restricted to a subset of team members, defined by channel owner.
    Group Chat
    Two or more users collected into a common conversation thread.
    Limits and Administrative Control
    Who can create? Default setting: All users in an organization can create a team

    Maximum 500,000 teams per tenant

    Any member of a team can create a public channel within the team

    Maximum 200 public channels per team

    Any member of a team can create a private channel and define its members

    Maximum 30 private channels per team

    Anyone
    Who can add members? Team owner(s); max 5,000 members per team N/A Channel owner(s) can add up to 250 members Anyone can bring new members into the chat (and decide if they can see the previous history) up to 100 members
    Who can delete? Team owner/admin can delete Any team member Channel owner(s) Anyone can leave a chat but cannot delete chat, but they are never effectively deleted
    Social Context
    Who can see it? Public teams are indexed and searchable

    Private teams are not indexed and are visible only to joined members

    All members of the team can see all public channels. Channels may be hidden from view for the purposes of cleaning up the UI. Individuals will only see private channels for which they have membership Only participants in the group chat can see the group chat
    Who can see the content? Team members can see any content that is not otherwise part of a private channel All team members All members of the private channel Only members of the group chat

    When does a Group Chat become a Channel?

    • When it’s appropriate for the conversation to have a gallery – an audience of members who may not be actively participating in the discussion.
    • When control over who joins the conversation needs to be centrally governed and not left up to anyone in the discussion.
    • When the discussion will persist over a longer time period.
    • When the number of participants approaches 100.

    When does a Channel become a Team?

    • When a team approaches 30 private channels, many of those private channels are likely candidates to become their own team.
    • When the channel membership needs to extend beyond the boundary of the team membership.

    Best practices: Workspaces 2/2

      Team
    A workspace for a group of collaborative individuals.
    Public Channel
    A focused area where all members of a team can meet, communicate, and share ideas and content.
    Private Channel
    Like a public channel but restricted to a subset of team members, defined by channel owner.
    Group Chat
    Two or more users collected into a common conversation thread.
    Data and Applications
    Where does the content live? SharePoint: Every team resides in its own SharePoint site SharePoint: Each team (public and private) has its own folder off the root of the SharePoint site’s repository SharePoint: Each team (public and private) has its own folder off the root of the SharePoint site’s repository OneDrive: Files that are shared in a chat are stored in the OneDrive folder of the original poster and shared to the other members
    How does the data persist or be retained? If a team expires/is deleted, its corresponding SharePoint site and those artifacts are also deleted Available for 21 days after deletion. Any member of the team can delete a public channel. The team owner and private channel owner can delete/restore a private channel Chats are never effectively deleted. They can be hidden to clean up the user interface.
    Video N/A Yes, select “Meet now” in channel below text entry box Yes, select “Meet now” in channel below text entry box Yes
    Phone calls N/A Yes, select “Meet now” in channel below text entry box Yes, select “Meet now” in channel below text entry box Yes
    Shared computer audio/screen N/A Yes, select “Meet now” in channel below text entry box Yes, select “Meet now” in channel below text entry box Yes
    File-sharing Within channels Yes. Frequently used/collaborated files can be turned into discrete tab. Yes. Frequently used/collaborated files can be turned into discrete tab. Yes
    Wikis Within channels Yes Yes No
    Whiteboarding No No No No

    When does a Team become a Channel?

    • When a team’s purpose for existing can logically be subsumed by another team that has a larger scope.

    When does a Channel become a Group Chat?

    • When a conversation within a channel between select users does not pertain to that channel’s scope (or any other existing channel), they should move the conversation to a group chat.
    • However, this is until that group chat desires to form a channel of its own.

    Create a new team

    Team owner: The person who creates the team. It is possible for the team owner to then invite other members of the team to become co-owners to distribute administrative responsibilities.

    Team members: People who have accepted their invitation to be a part of the team.

    NB: Your organization can control who has permission to set up a team. If you can’t set a up a team, contact your IT department.

    Screenshots detailing how to create a new team in Microsoft Teams, steps 1 to 3. Step 1: 'Click the <Teams data-verified= tab on the left-hand side of the app'. Step 2: 'At the bottom of the app, click '. Step 3: 'Under the banner , click '.">

    Create a new team

    Screenshot detailing how to create a new team in Microsoft Teams, the step 4 starting point with an arrow pointing to the 'Build a team from scratch' button.

    Decide from these two options:

    • Building a team from scratch, which will create a new group with no prior history imported (steps 4.1–4.3).
    • Creating a team from an existing group in Office 365, including an already existing team (steps 4.4–4.6).

    NB: You cannot create a team from an existing group if:

    • That group has 5,000 members or more.
    • That group is in Yammer.

    Screenshot detailing how to create a new team in Microsoft Teams, step 4.1. There are buttons for 'Private' and 'Public'.

    Decide if you want you new team from scratch to be private or public. If you set up a private team, any internal or external user you invite into the team will have access to all team history and files shared.

    Screenshot detailing how to create a new team in Microsoft Teams, step 4.2 and 4.3. 4.2 has a space to give your team a name and another for a description. 4.3 says 'Then click <Create data-verified='.">

    Create a new team

    Screenshot detailing how to create a new team in Microsoft Teams, the step 4 starting point with an arrow pointing to the 'Create from...' button.

    Decide from these two options:

    • Building a team from scratch, which will create a new group with no prior history imported (steps 4.1–4.3).
    • Creating a team from an existing group in Office 365, including an already existing team (steps 4.4–4.6).

    NB: You cannot create a team from an existing group if:

    • That group has 5,000 members or more.
    • That group is in Yammer.

    Screenshot detailing how to create a new team in Microsoft Teams, step 4.4. It reads 'Create a new team from something you already own' with a button for 'Team'.

    Configure your new team settings, including privacy, apps, tabs, and members.

    Screenshot detailing how to create a new team in Microsoft Teams, step 4.5 and 4.6. 4.5 has a space to give your team a name, a description, choose privacy settings, and what you'd like to include from the original team. 4.6 says 'Then click <Create data-verified='.">

    Add team members

    Remove team members

    Screenshot detailing how to add team members in Microsoft Teams, step 1.

    To add a team member, on the right-hand side of the team name, click “More options.”

    Then, from the drop-down menu, click “Add member.”

    Screenshot detailing how to remove team members in Microsoft Teams, step 1.

    Only team owners can remove a team member. To do so, on the right-hand side of the team name, click “More options.”

    Then, from the drop-down menu, click “Manage team.”

    Screenshot detailing how to add team members in Microsoft Teams, step 2.

    If you’re a team owner, you can then type a name or an email address to add another member to the team.

    If you’re a team member, typing a name or an email address will send a request to the team owner to consider adding the member.

    Screenshot detailing how to remove team members in Microsoft Teams, step 2.

    Under the “Members” tab, you’ll see a list of the members in the team. Click the “X” at the far right of the member’s name to remove them.

    Team owners can only be removed if they change their role to team member first.

    Create a new channel

    Screenshot detailing how to create a new channel in Microsoft Teams, step 1.

    On the right-hand side of the team name, click “More options.”

    Then, from the drop-down menu, click “Add channel.”

    Screenshot detailing how to create a new channel in Microsoft Teams, step 2.

    Name your channel, give a description, and set your channel’s privacy.

    Screenshot detailing how to create a new channel in Microsoft Teams, step 3.

    To manage subsequent permissions, on the right-hand side of the channel name, click “More options.”

    Then, from the drop-down menu, click “Manage channel.”

    Adding and removing members from channels:

    Only members in a team can see that team’s channels. Setting channel privacy as “standard” means that the channel can be accessed by anyone in a team. Unless privacy settings for a channel are set as “private” (from which the channel creator can choose who can be in that channel), there is no current way to remove members from channels.

    It will be up to the end user to decide which channels they want to hide.

    Link team/channel to SharePoint folder

    Screenshot detailing how to link a team or channel to a SharePoint folder in Microsoft Teams, steps 1, 2, and 3. Step 1: 'Along the top of the team/channel tab bar, click the “+” symbol'. Step 2: 'Select “Document Library” to link the team/channel to a SharePoint folder'. Step 3: 'Copy and paste the SharePoint URL for the desired folder, or search in “Relevant sites” if the folder can be found there'.

    Need to find the SharePoint URL?

    Screenshot detailing how to find the SharePoint URL in Microsoft Teams. 'Locate the folder in SharePoint and click <Show actions data-verified=', 'Click to access the folder's SharePoint URL.'">

    Hide/unhide teams

    Hide/unhide channels

    Screenshot detailing how to hide and unhide teams in Microsoft Teams, step 1.

    To hide a team, on the right-hand side of the team name, click “More options.”

    Then, from the drop-down menu, click “Hide.” Hidden teams are moved to the “hidden teams” menu at the bottom of your team list.

    Screenshot detailing how to hide and unhide channels in Microsoft Teams, step 1.

    To hide a channel, on the right-hand side of the channel name, click “More options.”

    Then, from the drop-down menu, click “Hide.” Hidden channels are moved to the “hidden channels” menu at the bottom of your channel list in that team.

    Screenshot detailing how to hide and unhide teams in Microsoft Teams, step 2. Screenshot of a button that says 'Hidden teams'.

    To unhide a team, click on the “hidden teams” menu. On the right-hand side of the team name, click “More options.”

    Then, from the drop-down menu, click “Show.”

    Screenshot detailing how to hide and unhide channels in Microsoft Teams, step 2.

    To unhide a channel, click on the “hidden channels” menu at the bottom of the team. This will produce a drop-down menu of all hidden channels in that team.

    Hover over the channel you want to unhide and click “Show.”

    Find/join teams

    Leave teams

    Screenshot detailing how to find and join teams in Microsoft Teams, step 1. Click the “Teams” tab on the left-hand side of the app. Screenshot detailing how to find and join teams in Microsoft Teams, step 2.

    At the bottom of the app, click “Join or create a team.” Teams will then suggest a range of teams that you might be looking for. You can join public teams immediately. You will have to request approval to join a private team.

    Screenshot detailing how to leave teams in Microsoft Teams.

    To leave a team, on the right-hand side of the team name, click “More options.”

    Then, from the drop-down menu, click “Leave the team.”

    NB: If the owner of a private team has switched off discoverability, you will have to contact that owner to join that team. Screenshot detailing how to find and join teams in Microsoft Teams, step 3. If you can’t immediately see the team, you have two options: either search for the team or enter that team’s code under the banner “Join a team with a code.” Can I find a channel?

    No. To join a channel, you need to first join the team that channel belongs to.

    Can I leave a channel?

    No. The most you can do is hide the channel. By default, if you join a team you will have access to all the channels within that team (unless a channel is private, in which case you’ll have to request access to that channel).

    Create a chat

    Screenshots detailing how to create a chat in Microsoft Teams, steps 1 to 5. Step 1:'Click the “Chat” tab on the left hand side of the app (or keyboard shortcut Ctrl+N)'. Step 2: 'Search the name of the person you want to chat with'. Step 3: 'You’re now ready to start the chat! You can also send a chat message while working in a separate channel by typing/chat into the search bar and entering the recipient’s name'. Step 4: 'For group chat, click the “Add people” button in the top right hand corner of the app to add other persons into the existing chat'. Step 5: 'You can then rename the group chat (if there are 3+ people) by clicking the “Name group chat” option to the right of the group chat members’ names'.

    Hide a chat

    Unhide a chat

    Screenshots detailing how to hide a chat in Microsoft Teams, steps 1 to 3. Step 1:'Click the “Chat” tab on the left-hand side of the app'. Step 2: 'Search the name of the chat or group chat that you want to hide'. Step 3: In either 'Single person chat options' or 'Group chat options' Click “More options.” Then click “Hide.”' To unhide a chat, search for the hidden person or name of the group chat in the search bar. Click “More options.” Then click “Unhide.” Screenshot detailing how to unhide a chat in Microsoft Teams.

    Leave a chat

    You can only leave group chats. To do so, click “More options.” Then click “Leave.” Screenshot detailing how to leave a chat in Microsoft Teams.

    Overview: Meetings and live events

    Teams Meetings: Real-time communication and collaboration between a group, limited to 250 people.

    Teams Live Events: designed for presentations and webinars to a large audience of up to 10,000 people, in which attendees watch rather than interact.

     

    Office 365 and Microsoft 365 Licenses

    I want to: F1 F3 E1 E3 E5 Audio conferencing add-on
    Join a Teams meeting No license required. Any email address can participate in a Teams meeting.
    Attend a Teams meeting with a dial-in phone number No license required. Any phone number can dial into a Teams meeting. (Meeting organizers need to have an Audio Conferencing add-on license to send an invite that includes dial-in conferencing.)
    Attend a Teams live event No license required. Any phone number can dial into a Teams live event.
    Create a Teams meeting for up to 250 attendees   One of these licensing plans
    Create a Teams meeting for up to 250 attendees with a dial-in phone number   One of these licensing plans + Audio Conferencing (Meeting organizers need to have an Audio Conferencing add-on license to send an invite that includes dial-in conferencing.)
    Create a Teams live event for up to 10,000 attendees     One of these licensing plans
    Dial out from a Teams meeting to add someone at their Call me at number   One of these licensing plans + Audio Conferencing (Meeting dial out to a Call me at number requires organizers to have an E5 or Audio Conference add-in license. A dial plan may also be needed.)

    Depending on the use case, end users will have to determine whether they need to hold a meeting or a live event.

    Use Microsoft’s table (left) to see what license your organization needs to perform meetings and live events.

    (Source: “Admin quick start – Meetings and live events in Microsoft Teams,” Microsoft, 2020.)

    Best practices: Meetings

      Ad Hoc Call
    Direct audio/video call
    Scheduled Meeting Live Event
    Limits and Administrative Control
    Who can create? Anyone Anyone Anyone, unless altered by admin (permission to create MS Stream events also required if external production tools are used).
    Who can add members? Anyone in the session. The meeting organizer can add new attendees to the meeting. The event creator (the “organizer”) sets attendee permissions and assigns event group roles (“producer” and “presenter”).
    Can external stakeholders attend? Yes, through email invite. However, collaboration tools are restricted. Yes, through email invite. However, collaboration tools are restricted. Public events: yes, through shared invite link.
    Org-wide event: yes, if guest/external access granted.
    Who can delete? Anyone can leave the session. There is no artifact to delete. The meeting organizer Any attendee can leave the session.
    The organizer can cancel the event.
    Maximum attendees 100 250 10,000 attendees and 10 active presenters/producers (250 presenters and producers can be present at the event).
    Social Context
    How does the request come in? Unscheduled.
    Notification of an incoming audio or video call.
    Scheduled.
    Meeting invite, populated in the calendar, at a scheduled time.
    Meeting only auto-populated in event group’s calendars. Organizer must circulate event invite link to attendees – for instance, by pasting link into an Outlook meeting invite.
    Available Functionality
    Screen-sharing Yes Yes Producers and Presenters (through Teams, no third-party app).
    Whiteboard No Yes Yes
    OneNote (for minutes) Yes (from a member’s OneDrive) Yes, part of the meeting construct. No. A Meeting Notes tab is available instead.
    Dedicated chat space Yes. Derived from a group chat. Meeting has its own chat room. The organizer can set up a moderated Q&A (not chat) when creating the event. Only Presenters and Producers can chat.
    Recording Yes Yes Yes. Event can last up to 4 hours.

    When should an Ad Hoc Call become a Scheduled Meeting?

    • When the participants need time to prepare content for the call.
    • When an answer is not required immediately.
    • When bringing a group of people together requires logistical organizing.

    When should a Scheduled Meeting become an Ad Hoc Call?

    • When the participants can meet on short notice.
    • When a topic under discussion requires creating alignment quickly.

    When should a Live Event be created?

    • When the expected attendance exceeds 250 people.
    • If the event does not require collaboration and is mostly a presenter conveying information.

    Create a scheduled meeting

    Screenshots detailing how to create a scheduled meeting in Microsoft Teams, steps 1 to 4. Step 1:'Click the “Calendar” tab on the left-hand side of the app'. Step 2: 'On the top-right of the app, click the drop-down menu for “+ New meeting” and then “Schedule meeting.”' Step 3: 'Fill in the meeting details. When inputting internal attendees, their names will drop down without needing their email. You will need to input email addresses for external attendees'. Step 4: 'To determine internal attendees’ availability, click “Scheduling assistant” on the top left. Then click “Save” to create the meeting'.

    Create an ad hoc meeting

    Screenshots detailing how to create an ad hoc meeting in Microsoft Teams, steps 1 to 4. Step 1:'Click the “Calendar” tab on the left-hand side of the app'. Step 2: 'Along the top-right, click “Meet now.”' Step 3: 'Name your meeting, choose your audio and video settings, and click “Join now.”'. Step 4: 'To determine internal attendees’ availability, click “Scheduling assistant” on the top left. Then click “Save” to create the meeting. You’ll then be prompted to fill in the meeting details. When inputting internal attendees, their names will drop down without needing their email. You will need to input email addresses for external attendees'.

    Tip: Use existing channels to host the chatrooms for your online meetings

    When you host a meeting online with Microsoft Teams, there will always be a chatroom associated with the meeting. While this is a great place for meeting participants to interact, there is one particular downside.

    Problem: The never-ending chat. Often the activity in these chatrooms can persist long after the meeting. The chatroom itself becomes, unofficially, a channel. When end users can’t keep up with the deluge of communication, the tools have failed them.

    Solution: Adding an existing channel to the meeting. This ensures that discussion activity is already hosted in the appropriate venue for the group, during and after the meeting. Furthermore, it provides non-attendees with a means to catch up on the discussion they have missed.

    In section two of this cookbook, we will often refer to this tactic.

    A screenshot detailing how to add an existing channel to a meeting in Microsoft Teams. 'Break the habit of online booking meetings in Outlook – use the Teams Calendar View instead! In order to make use of this function, the meeting must be setup in Microsoft Teams, not Microsoft Outlook. The option to assign a channel to the meeting will then be available to the meeting organizer.'

    Don’t have a channel for the chat session of your online meeting? Perhaps you should!

    If your meeting is with a group of individuals that will be collaborating frequently, they may need a workspace that persists beyond the meeting.

    Guests can still attend the meeting, but they can’t chat!

    If there are attendees in your meeting that do not have access to the channel you select to host the chat, they will not see the chat discussion nor have any ability to use this function.

    This may be appropriate in some cases – for example, a vendor providing a briefing as part of a regular team meeting.

    However, if there are attendees outside the channel membership that need to see the meeting chat, consider another channel or simply default to not assigning one.

    Meeting settings explained

    Show device settings. For settings concerning audio, video, and whether viewing is private.

    Show meeting notes. Use to take notes throughout the meeting. The notes will stay attached to this event.

    Show meeting details. Find meeting information for: a dial-in number, conference ID, and link to join.

    Enter full screen.

    Show background effects. Choose from a range of video backgrounds to hide/blur your location.

    Turn on the captions (preview). Turn on live speech-to-text captions.

    Keypad. For dialing a number within the meeting (when enabled as an add-on with E3 or as part of E5).

    Start recording. Recorded and saved using Microsoft Stream.

    End meeting.

    Turn off incoming video. To save network bandwidth, you can decline receiving attendee’s video.

    Click “More options” to access the meetings settings.

    Screen share. In the tool tray, select “Share” to share your screen. Select particular applications if you only want to share certain information; otherwise, you can share your whole desktop.

    System audio share. To share your device’s audio while screen sharing, checkbox the “Include system audio” option upon clicking “Share.”

    If you didn’t click that option at the start but now want to share audio during screen share, click the “Include systems audio” option in the tool tray along the top of the screen.

    Give/take control of screen share. To give control, click “Give control” in the tool tray along the top of the screen when sharing content. Choose from the drop-down who you would like to give control to. In the same spot, click “Take back control” when required.

    To request control, click “Request control” in the same space when viewing someone sharing their content. Click “Release control” once finished.

    Start whiteboarding

    1. You’ll first need to enable Microsoft Whiteboard in the Microsoft 365 admin center. Ask your relevant admin to do so if Whiteboard is not already enabled.
    2. Once enabled, click “Share” in a meeting. This feature only appears if you have 3+ participants in the meeting.
    3. Under the “Whiteboard” section in the bottom right, click “Microsoft Whiteboard.”
    4. Click the pen icons to the right of the screen to begin sketching.

    NB: Anonymous, federated, or guest users are currently not supported to start, view, or ink a whiteboard in a Teams meeting.

    Will the whiteboard session be recorded if the meeting is being recorded?

    No. However, the final whiteboard will be available to all meeting attendees after the meeting, under “Board Gallery” in the Microsoft Whiteboard app. Attendees can then continue to work on the whiteboard after the meeting has ended.

    Create a live event

    Screenshots detailing how to create a live event in Microsoft Teams, steps 1 to 3. Step 1: 'Click the “Calendar” tab on the left-hand side of the app'. Step 2: 'On the top right of the app, click the drop-down menu for “+ New meeting” and then “Live event.”' Step 3: 'You will be labeled the “Event organizer.” First, fill in the live event details on the left'. Screenshot detailing how to create a live event in Microsoft Teams, step 4.

    As the organizer, you can invite other people to the event who will be the “producers” or “presenters.”

    Producers: Control the live event stream, including being able to start and stop the event, share their own and others’ video, share desktop or window, and select layout.

    Presenters: Present audio, video, or a screen.

    Screenshot detailing how to create a live event in Microsoft Teams, step 5.

    Select who your audience will be for your live event from three options: specified people and groups, the organization, or the public with no sign-in required.

    Edit the setting for whether you want recording to be available for attendees.

    Then click “Schedule” to finish.

    Live event settings explained

    When you join the live event as a producer/presenter, nothing will be immediately broadcast. You’ll be in a pre-live state. Decide what content to share and in what order. Along the bottom of the screen, you can share your video and audio, share your screen, and mute incoming attendees.

    Once your content is ready to share along the bottom of the screen, add it to the screen on the left, in order of viewing. This is your queue – your “Pre-live” state. Then, click “Send now.”

    This content will now move to the right-hand screen, ready for broadcasting. Once you’re ready to broadcast, click “Start.” Your state will change from “Pre-live” to “Live.”

    Along the top right of the app will be a tools bar.

    Screenshot listing live events settings icons in Microsoft Teams. Beside the heart monitor icon is 'Monitor health and performance of network, devices, and media sharing'. Beside the notepad icon is 'Take meeting notes'. Beside the chatbox icon is 'Chat function'. Beside the two little people with a plus sign icon is 'Invite and show participants'. Beside the gear icon is 'Device settings'. Beside the small 'i' in a circle is 'Meeting details, including schedule, meeting link, and dial-in number'.

    Workspace #1: Departments

    Scenario: Most of your organization’s communication and collaboration occurs within its pre-existing departmental divisions.

    Conventional communication channels:

    • Oral communication: Employees work in proximity to each other and communicate in person, by phone, in department meetings
    • Email: Department-wide announcements
    • Memos: Typically posted/circulated in mailboxes

    Solution: Determine the best way to organize your organization’s departments in Teams based on its size and your requirements to keep information private between departments.

    Option A:

    • Create a team for the organization/division.
    • Create channels for each department. Remember that all members of a team can view all public channels created in that team and the default General channel.
    • Create private channels if you wish to have a channel that only select members of that team can see. Remember that private channels have some limitations in functionality.

    Option B:

    • Create a new team for each department.
    • Create channels within this team for projects or topics that are recurring workflows for the department members. Only department members can view the content of these channels.

    Option C:

    • Post departmental memos and announcements in the General channel.
    • Use “Meet now” in channels for ad hoc meetings. For regular department meetings, create a recurring Teams calendar event for the specific department channel (Option A) or the General channel (Option B). Remember that all members of a team can join a public channel meeting.

    Workspace #2: A cross-functional committee

    Scenario: Your organization has struck a committee composed of members from different departments. The rest of the organization should not have access to the work done in the committee.

    Purpose: To analyze a particular organizational challenge and produce a plan or report; to confidentially develop or carry out a series of processes that affect the whole organization.

    Jobs: Committee members must be able to:

    • Attend private meetings.
    • Share files confidentially.

    Solution:

    Ingredients:

    • Private team

    Construction:

    • Create a new private team for the cross-functional committee.
    • Add only committee members to the team.
    • Create channels based on the topics likely to be the focal point of the committee work.
    • Decide how you will use the mandatory General channel. If the committee is small and the work limited in scope, this channel may be the main communication space. If the committee is larger or the work more complex, use the General channel for announcements and move discussions to new topic-related channels.
    • Schedule recurring committee meetings in the Teams calendar. Add the relevant channel to the meeting invite to keep the meeting chat attached to this team and channel (as meeting organizer, put your name in the meeting invite notes, as the channel will show as the organizer in the Outlook invite).
    • Remember that all members of this team will have access to these meetings and be able to view that they are occurring.

    Workspace #3: An innovation day event

    Scenario: The organization holds a yearly innovation day event in which employees form small groups and work on a defined, short-term problem or project.

    Purpose: To develop innovative solutions and ideas.

    Jobs:

    • Convene small groups.
    • Work toward time-sensitive goals.
    • Communicate synchronously.
    • Share files.

    Solution:

    Ingredients:

    • Public team
    • Channel tabs
    • Whiteboard
    • Planner

    Construction:

    • Create a team for the innovation day event.
    • Add channels for each project working group.
    • Communicate to participants the schedule for the day and their assigned channel.
    • Use the General channel for announcements and instructions throughout the day. Ensure someone moderates the General channel for participants’ questions.
    • Pre-populate the channel tabs with files the participants need to work with. To add a scrum board, refer to M#4 (Morning stand-up/Scrum) in this slide deck.
    • For breakouts, instruct participants to use the “meet now” feature in their channel and how to use the Whiteboard during these meetings.
    • Arrange to have your IT admin archive the team after a certain point so the material is still viewable but not editable.

    Workspace #4: A non-work-related social event

    Scenario: Employees within the organization wish to organize social events around shared interests: board game clubs, book clubs, TV show discussion groups, trivia nights, etc.

    Purpose: To encourage cohesion among coworkers and boost morale.

    Jobs:

    • Schedule the event.
    • Invite participants.
    • Prepare the activity.
    • Host and moderate the discussion.

    Solution:

    Ingredients:

    • Public team
    • Private channels
    • Screen-sharing

    Construction:

    • Create a public team for the social event so that interested people can find and join it.
    • Example: Trivia Night
      • Schedule the event in the Teams calendar.
      • Publish the link to the Trivia Night team where other employees will see it.
      • Create private channels for each trivia team so they cannot see the other competitors’ discussions. Add yourself to each private channel so you can see their answers.
      • As the host, begin a meeting in the General channel. Pose the trivia questions live or present the questions on PowerPoint via screen-sharing.
      • Ask each team to post its answers to its private channel.
    • To avoid teams sprawl, ask your IT admin to set a deletion policy for the team, as long as this request does not contradict your organization’s policies on data retention. If the team becomes moribund, it can be set to auto-delete after a certain period of time.

    Workspace #5: A project team with a defined end time

    Scenario: Within a department/workplace team, employees are assigned to projects with defined end times, after which they will be assigned to a new project.

    Purpose: To complete project-based work that fulfills business needs.

    Jobs:

    • Oral communication with team members.
    • Synchronous and asynchronous work on project files.
    • The ability to attend scheduled meetings and ad hoc meetings.
    • The ability to access shared resources related to the project.

    Solution:

    If your working group already has its own team within Teams:

    • Create a new public or private channel for the project. Remember that some functionality is not available in private channels (such as Microsoft Planner).
    • Use the channel for the project team’s meetings (scheduled in Teams calendar or through Meet Now).
    • Add a tab that links to the team’s project folder in SharePoint.

    If your workplace team does not already have its own team in Teams:

    • Determine if there is a natural fit for this project as a new channel in an existing team. Remember that all team members will be able to see the channel if it is public and that all relevant project members need to belong to the Team to participate in the channel.
    • If necessary, create a new team for the project. Add the project members.
    • Create channels based on the type of work that comprises the project.
    • Use the channel for the project team’s meetings (scheduled in Teams calendar or through Meet Now)
    • Add a tab to link to the team’s project folder in SharePoint.

    Info-tech Best Practice

    Hide the channel after the project concludes to de-clutter your Teams user interface.

    Meeting #1: Job interview with external candidate

    Scenario: The organization must interview a slate of candidates to fill an open position.

    Purpose:

    • Select the most qualified candidate for the job.

    Jobs:

    • Create a meeting, ensuring the candidate and other attendees know when and where the meeting will happen.
    • Ensure the meeting is secure to protect confidential information.
    • Ensure the meeting is accessible, allowing the candidate to present themselves through audio and/or visual means.
    • Create a professional environment for the meeting to take place.
    • Engender a space for the candidate to share their CV, research, or other relevant file.
    • The interview must be transcribed and recorded.

    Solution:

    Ingredients:

    • Private Teams meeting
    • Screen-sharing
    • Microsoft Stream

    Construction:

    • Create a Teams meeting, inviting the candidate with their email, alongside other internal attendees. The Teams meeting invite will auto-generate a link to the meeting itself.
    • The host can control who joins the meeting through settings for the “lobby.”
    • Through the Teams meeting, the attendees will be able to use the voice and video chat functionality.
    • All attendees can opt to blur their backgrounds to maintain a professional online presence.
    • The candidate can share their screen, either specific applications or their whole desktop, during the Teams meeting.
    • A Teams meeting can be recorded and transcribed through Stream. After the meeting, the transcript can be searched, edited, and shared

    NB: The external candidate does not need the Teams application. Through the meeting invite, the external candidate will join via a web browser.

    Meeting #2: Quarterly board meeting

    Scenario: Every quarter, the organization holds its regular board meeting.

    Purpose: To discuss agenda items and determine the company’s future direction.

    Jobs:

    During meeting:
      • Attendance and minutes must be taken.
      • Votes must be recorded.
      • In-camera sessions must occur.
      • External experts must be included.
    After meeting:
    • Follow-up items must be assigned.
    • Reports must be submitted.

    Solution:

    Ingredients:

    • Teams calendar invite
    • Planner; Forms
    • Private channel
    • Microsoft Stream

    Construction:

    • Guest Invite: Invites can be sent to any non-domain-joined email address to join a private, invitation-only channel within the team controlled by the board chair.
    • SharePoint & Flow: Documents are emailed to the Team addresses, which kicks off an MS Flow routine to collect review notes.
    • Planner: Any board member can assign tasks to any employee.
    • Forms/Add-On: Chair puts down the form of the question and individual votes are tracked.
    • Teams cloud meeting recording: Recording available through Stream. Manual edits can be made to VTT caption file. Greater than acceptable transcription error rate.
    • Meeting Log: Real-time attendance is viewable but a point-in-time record needs admin access.

    NB: The external guests do not need the Teams application. Through the meeting invite, the guests will join via a web browser.

    Meeting #3: Weekly team meeting

    Scenario: A team meets for a weekly recurring meeting. The meeting is facilitated by the team lead (or manager) who addresses through agenda items and invites participation from the attendees.

    Purpose: The purpose of the meeting is to:

    • Share information verbally
    • Present content visually
    • Achieve consensus
    • Build team morale

    Jobs: The facilitator must:

    • Determine participants
    • Book room
    • Book meeting in calendar

    Solution:

    Ingredients:

    • Meeting Place: A channel in Microsoft Teams (must be public) where all members of the meeting make up the entirety of the audience.
    • Calendar Recurrence: A meeting is booked through Teams and appears in all participants’ Outlook calendar.
    • Collaboration Space: Participants join the meeting through video or audio and can share screens and contribute text, images, and links to the meeting chat.

    Construction:

    • Ensure your team already has a channel created for it. If not, create one in the appropriate team.
    • Create the meeting using the calendar view within Microsoft Teams:
      • Set the meeting’s name, attendees, time, and recurrence.
      • Add the team channel that serves as the most appropriate workplace for the meeting. (Any discussion in the meeting chat will be posted to this channel.)

    NB: Create the meeting in the Teams calendar, not Outlook, or you will not be able to add the Teams channel. As meeting organizer, put your name in the meeting invite notes, as the channel will show as the organizer in the Outlook invite.

    Meeting #4: Morning stand-up/scrum

    Scenario: Each morning, at 9am, members of the team meet online.

    Purpose: After some pleasantries, the team discusses what tasks they each plan to complete in the day.

    Jobs: The team leader (or scrum master) must:

    • Place all tasks on a scrum board, each represented by a sticky note denoting the task name and owner.
    • Move the sticky notes through the columns, adjusting assignments as needed.
    • Sort tasks into the following columns: “Not Started,” “In Progress,” and “Done.”

    Solution:

    Ingredients:

    • Meeting Place: A channel in Microsoft Teams (must be public) where all members of the meeting make up the entirety of the audience.
    • Scrum Board: A tab within that channel where a persistent scrum board has been created and is visible to all team members.

    Meeting Place Construction:

    • Create the meeting using the calendar view in Teams.
    • Set the meeting’s name, attendees, time, and work-week daily recurrence (see left).
    • Add the channel that is the most appropriate workplace for the meeting. Any meeting chat will be posted to this channel rather than a separate chat.

    Scrum Board Construction:

    • Add a tab to the channel using Microsoft Planner as the app. (You can use other task management apps such as Trello, but the identity integration of first-party Office 365 tools may be less hassle.)
    • Create a new (or import an existing) Plan to the channel. This will be used as the focal point.

    Meeting #5: Weekly team meeting

    Scenario: An audio-only conversation that could be a regularly scheduled event but is more often conducted on an ad-hoc basis.

    Purpose: To quickly share information, achieve consensus, or clarify misunderstandings.

    Jobs:

    • Dial recipient
    • See missed calls
    • Leave/check voicemail
    • Create speed-dial list
    • Conference call

    Solution:

    Ingredients:

    • Audio call begun through Teams chat.

    Construction:

    • Voice over IP calls between users in the same MS Teams tenant can begin in multiple ways:
      • A call can be initiated through any appearance of a user’s profile picture: hover over user’s profile photo in the Chat list and select the phone icon.
      • Enter your last chat with a user and click phone icon in upper-right corner.
      • Go to the Calls section and type the name in the “Make a call” text entry form.
    • Voicemail: Voicemail, missed calls, and call history are available in the Calls section.
    • Speed dial: Speed dial lists can be created in the Calls section.
    • Conference call: Other users can be added to an ongoing call.

    NB: Microsoft Teams can be configured to provide an organization’s telephony for external calls, but this requires an E5 license. Additional audio-conferencing licenses are required to call in to a Teams meeting over a phone.

    Bibliography 1/4

    Section 1: Teams for IT › Creation Process

    Overview: Creation process
    Assign admin roles
    Prepare the network
    Team creation
    Integrations with SharePoint Online
    Permissions

    Bibliography 2/4

    Section 1: Teams for IT › Creation Process (cont'd.)

    External and guest access
    Expiration and archiving
    Retention and data loss prevention
    Teams telephony

    Bibliography 3/4

    Section 1: Teams for IT › Teams Rollout

    From Skype to Teams
    From Slack to Teams
    Teams adoption

    Section 1: Teams for IT › Use Cases

    Bibliography 4/4

    Section 2: Teams for End Users › Teams, Channels, Chat

    Section 2: Teams for End Users › Meetings and Live Events

    Section 2: Teams for End Users › Use Cases

    Modernize Your SDLC

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}148|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.5/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $30,263 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 39 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Development
    • Parent Category Link: /development
    • Today’s rapidly scaling and increasingly complex products create mounting pressure on delivery teams to release new features and changes quickly and with sufficient quality.
    • Many organizations lack the critical capabilities and resources needed to satisfy their growing backlog, jeopardizing product success.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Delivery quality and throughput go hand in hand. Focus on meeting minimum process and product quality standards first. Improved throughput will eventually follow.
    • Business integration is not optional. The business must be involved in guiding delivery efforts, and ongoing validation and verification product changes.
    • The software development lifecycle (SDLC) must deliver more than software. Business value is generated through the products and services delivered by your SDLC. Teams must provide the required product support and stakeholders must be willing to participate in the product’s delivery.

    Impact and Result

    • Standardize your definition of a successful product. Come to an organizational agreement of what defines a high-quality and successful product. Accommodate both business and IT perspectives in your definition.
    • Clarify the roles, processes, and tools to support business value delivery and satisfy stakeholder expectations. Indicate where and how key roles are involved throughout product delivery to validate and verify work items and artifacts. Describe how specific techniques and tools are employed to meet stakeholder requirements.
    • Focus optimization efforts on most affected stages. Reveal the health of your SDLC from the value delivery, business and technical practice quality standards, discipline, throughput, and governance perspectives with a diagnostic. Identify and roadmap the solutions to overcome the root causes of your diagnostic results.

    Modernize Your SDLC Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should modernize your SDLC, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Set your SDLC context

    State the success criteria of your SDLC practice through the definition of product quality and organizational priorities. Define your SDLC current state.

    • Modernize Your SDLC – Phase 1: Set Your SDLC Context
    • SDLC Strategy Template

    2. Diagnose your SDLC

    Build your SDLC diagnostic framework based on your practice’s product and process objectives. Root cause your improvement opportunities.

    • Modernize Your SDLC – Phase 2: Diagnose Your SDLC
    • SDLC Diagnostic Tool

    3. Modernize your SDLC

    Learn of today’s good SDLC practices and use them to address the root causes revealed in your SDLC diagnostic results.

    • Modernize Your SDLC – Phase 3: Modernize Your SDLC
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Modernize Your SDLC

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Set Your SDLC Context

    The Purpose

    Discuss your quality and product definitions and how quality is interpreted from both business and IT perspectives.

    Review your case for strengthening your SDLC practice.

    Review the current state of your roles, processes, and tools in your organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Grounded understanding of products and quality that is accepted across the organization.

    Clear business and IT objectives and metrics that dictate your SDLC practice’s success.

    Defined SDLC current state people, process, and technologies.

    Activities

    1.1 Define your products and quality.

    1.2 Define your SDLC objectives.

    1.3 Measure your SDLC effectiveness.

    1.4 Define your current SDLC state.

    Outputs

    Product and quality definitions.

    SDLC business and technical objectives and vision.

    SDLC metrics.

    SDLC capabilities, processes, roles and responsibilities, resourcing model, and tools and technologies.

    2 Diagnose Your SDLC

    The Purpose

    Discuss the components of your diagnostic framework.

    Review the results of your SDLC diagnostic.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    SDLC diagnostic framework tied to your SDLC objectives and definitions.

    Root causes to your SDLC issues and optimization opportunities.

    Activities

    2.1 Build your diagnostic framework.

    2.2 Diagnose your SDLC.

    Outputs

    SDLC diagnostic framework.

    Root causes to SDLC issues and optimization opportunities.

    3 Modernize Your SDLC

    The Purpose

    Discuss the SDLC practices used in the industry.

    Review the scope and achievability of your SDLC optimization initiatives.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Knowledge of good practices that can improve the effectiveness and efficiency of your SDLC.

    Realistic and achievable SDLC optimization roadmap.

    Activities

    3.1 Learn and adopt SDLC good practices.

    3.2 Build your optimization roadmap.

    Outputs

    Optimization initiatives and target state SDLC practice.

    SDLC optimization roadmap, risks and mitigations, and stakeholder communication flow.

    State of Hybrid Work in IT

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}551|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Attract & Select
    • Parent Category Link: /attract-and-select

    Hybrid work is here, but there is no consensus among industry leaders on how to do it right. IT faces the dual challenge of supporting its own employees while enabling the success of the broader organization. In the absence of a single best practice to adopt, how can IT departments make the right decisions when it comes to the new world of hybrid?

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Don’t make the mistake of emulating the tech giants, unless they are your direct competition. Instead, look to organizations that have walked your path in terms of scope, organizational goals, industry, and organizational structure. Remember, your competitors are not just those who compete for the same customers but also those who compete for your employees.
    • Hybrid and remote teams require more attention, connection, and leadership from managers. The shift from doing the day-to-day to effectively leading is critical for the success of nontraditional work models. As hybrid and remote work become engrained in society, organizations must ensure that the concept of the “working manager” is as obsolete as the rotary telephone.

    Impact and Result

    Read this concise report to learn:

    • What other IT organizations are doing in the new hybrid world.
    • How hybrid has impacted infrastructure, operations, and business relations.
    • How to succeed at building a highly effective hybrid team.
    • How Info-Tech can help you make hybrid an asset for your IT department.

    State of Hybrid Work in IT Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. State of Hybrid Work in IT: A Trend Report – A walkthrough of the latest data on the impact of the hybrid work revolution in IT.

    Read this report to learn how IT departments are using the latest trends in hybrid work for greater IT effectiveness. Understand what work models are best for IT, how IT can support a remote organization, and how hybrid work changes team dynamics.

    • State of Hybrid Work in IT: A Trends Report

    Infographic

    Further reading

    State of Hybrid Work in IT: A Trend Report

    When tech giants can’t agree and best practices change by the minute, forge your own path to your next normal.

    Hybrid is here. Now how do we do this?

    The pandemic has catapulted hybrid work to the forefront of strategic decisions an organization needs to make. According to our State of Hybrid Work in IT survey conducted in July of 2022, nearly all organizations across all industries are continuing some form of hybrid or remote work long-term (n=518). Flexible work location options are the single greatest concern for employees seeking a new job. IT departments are tasked with not only solving hybrid work questions for their own personnel but also supporting a hybrid-first organization, which means significant changes to technology and operations.

    Faced with decisions that alter the very foundation of how an organization functions, IT leaders are looking for best practices and coming up empty. The world of work has changed quickly and unexpectedly. If you feel you are “winging it” in the new normal, you are not alone.

    95% of organizations are continuing some form of hybrid or remote work.

    n=518

    47% of respondents look at hybrid work options when evaluating a new employer, vs. 46% who look at salary.

    n=518

    Hybrid work model decision tree

    Your organization, your employees, your goals – your hybrid work

    The days of a “typical” workplace have passed. When it comes to the new world of hybrid work, there is no best-of-breed example to follow.

    Among the flood of contradictory decisions made by industry leaders, your IT organization must forge its own path, informed by the needs of your employees and your organizational goals.

    All IT work models can support the broader organization. However, IT is more effective in a hybrid work mode.

    Stay informed on where your industry is headed, but learn from, rather than follow, industry leaders.

    All industries reported primarily using partial, balanced & full hybrid work models.

    All industries reported some fully remote work, ranging from 2-10% of organizations surveyed.

    Construction and healthcare & life sciences did not require any fully in-office work. Other industries, between 1-12% required fully in-office work.

    The image contains a screenshot of the Enablement of Organizational Goals.

    Move beyond following tech giants

    The uncomfortable truth about hybrid work is that there are many viable models, and the “best of breed” depends on who you ask. In the post-pandemic workspace, for every work location model there is an industry leader that has made it functional. And yet this doesn’t mean that every model will be viable for your organization.

    In the absence of a single best practice, rely on an individualized cost-benefit assessment rooted in objective feasibility criteria. Every work model – whether it continues your status quo or overhauls the working environment – introduces risk. Only in the context of your particular organization does that risk become quantifiable.

    Don’t make the mistake of emulating the tech giants, unless they are your direct competition. Instead, look to organizations that have walked your path in terms of scope, organizational goals, industry, and organizational structure.

    External

    Internal

    Political

    Economic

    Social

    Technological

    Legal

    Environmental

    Operations

    Culture

    Resources

    Risk

    Benefit

    Employee Preferences

    Comparative

    Your competitors

    Info-Tech Insight

    Remember, your competitors are not just those who compete for the same customers but also those who compete for your employees.

    IT must balance commitments to both the organization and its employees

    IT has two roles: to effectively support the broader organization and to function effectively within the department. It therefore has two main stakeholder relationships: the organization it supports and the employees it houses. Hybrid work impacts both. Don't make the mistake of overweighting one relationship at the expense of the other. IT will only function effectively when it addresses both.

    Track your progress with the right metrics

    IT and the organization

    • Business satisfaction with IT
    • Perception of IT value

    Diagnostic tool: Business Vision

    IT and its employees

    • Employee engagement

    Diagnostic tool:
    Employee Engagement Surveys

    This report contains:

    1. IT and the Organization
      1. IT Effectiveness
        in a Hybrid World
      2. The Impact of Hybrid on Infrastructure & Operations
    2. IT and Its Employees
      1. What Hybrid Means for the IT Workforce
      2. Leadership for Hybrid IT Teams

    This report is based on organizations like yours

    The image contains graphs that demonstrate demographics of organizations.

    This report is based on organizations like yours

    The image contains two graphs that demonstrate a breakdown of departments in an organization.

    This report is based on organizations like yours

    The image contains two graphs that demonstrate the workforce type and operating budget.


    This report is based on organizations like yours

    The image contains two graphs that demonstrate organization maturity and effectiveness score.

    At a high level, hybrid work in IT is everywhere

    INDUSTRY

    • Arts & Entertainment (including sports)
    • Retail & Wholesale
    • Utilities
    • Transportation & Warehousing
    • Not-for-Profit (incl. professional associations)
    • Education
    • Professional Services
    • Manufacturing
    • Media, Information, Telecom & Technology
    • Construction
    • Gaming & Hospitality
    • Government
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
    • Financial Services (incl. banking & insurance)

    ORGANIZATIONAL SIZE

    Small

    <100

    Medium

    101-5,000

    Large

    >5,000

    Employees

    POSITION LEVEL

    • Executive
    • Director
    • Supervisor/Manager
    • Student/Contractor/Team Member

    100% of industries, organizational sizes, and position levels reported some form of hybrid or remote work.

    Work model breakdown at the respondent level

    5% 21% 30% 39% 5%

    No Remote
    Work

    Partial Hybrid

    Balanced Hybrid

    Full Hybrid

    Full Remote

    Work

    n=516

    Industry lens: Work location model

    The image contains a screenshot of a graph that demonstrates the work location model with the work model breakdown at the respondent level.

    Percentage of IT roles currently in a hybrid or remote work arrangement

    The image contains a screenshot of two graphs that demonstrate the percentage of IT roles currently in a hybrid or remote work arrangement.

    Work location model by organization size

    The image contains a screenshot of a graph that demonstrates work location model by organization size.

    Hybrid work options

    The image contains a screenshot of two pie graphs that demonstrate hybrid work options.

    Expense reimbursement

    28% 27% 22% 26% 13% 4%

    None

    Internet/home phone

    Just internet

    Home office setup

    Home utilities

    Other

    NOTES

    n=518

    Home office setup: One-time lump-sum payment

    Home utilities: Gas, electricity, lights, etc.

    Other: Office supplies, portion of home rent/mortgage payments, etc.

    01 TECHNOLOGY

    IT and the Organization

    Section 1

    The promise of hybrid work for IT department effectiveness and the costs of making it happen

    In this section:

    1. IT Effectiveness in a Hybrid World
    2. The Impact of Hybrid on Infrastructure & Operations

    Hybrid work models in IT bolster effectiveness

    IT’s effectiveness, meaning its ability to enable organizational goal attainment, is its ultimate success metric. In the post-pandemic world, this indicator is intimately tied to IT’s work location model, as well as IT’s ability to support the work location model used by the broader organization.

    In 2022, 90% of organizations have embraced some form of hybrid work (n=516). And only a small contingent of IT departments have more than 90% of roles still working completely in office, with no remote work offered (n=515).

    This outcome was not unexpected, given the unprecedented success of remote work during the pandemic. However, the implications of this work model were far less certain. Would productivity remain once the threat of layoffs had passed? Would hybrid work be viable in the long term, once the novelty wore off? Would teams be able to function collaboratively without meeting face to face? Would hybrid allow a great culture
    to continue?

    All signs point to yes. For most IT departments, the benefits of hybrid work outweigh its costs. IT is significantly more effective when some degree of remote or hybrid work is present.

    The image contains a screenshot of a graph on how hybrid work models in IT bolster effectiveness.

    n=518

    Remote Work Effectiveness Paradox

    When IT itself works fully onsite, lower effectiveness is reported (6.2). When IT is tasked with supporting fully, 100% remote organizations (as opposed to being fully remote only within IT), lower effectiveness is reported then as well (5.9). A fully remote organization means 100% virtual communication, so the expectations placed on IT increase, as do the stakes of any errors. Of note, hybrid work models yield consistent effectiveness scores when implemented at both the IT and organizational levels.

    IT has risen to the challenge of hybrid

    Despite the challenges initially posed by hybrid and remote organizations, IT has thrived through the pandemic and into this newly common workplace.

    Most organizations have experienced an unchanged or increased level of service requests and incidents. However, for the majority of organizations, service desk support has maintained (58%) or improved (35%). Only 7% of IT organizations report decreased service desk support.

    Is your service desk able to offer the same level of support compared to the pre-pandemic/pre-hybrid work model?

    The image contains a screenshot of a graph that demonstrates service desk levels.

    How has the volume of your service requests/incidents changed?

    The image contains a screenshot of a graph that demonstrates volume of service requests/incidents changed.

    Has hybrid work impacted your customer satisfaction scores?

    The image contains a graph that demonstrates if hybrid work impacted customer satisfaction scores.

    Industry lens: Volume of service requests

    It is interesting to note that service request volumes have evolved similarly across industries, mirroring the remarkable consistency with which hybrid work has been adopted across disparate fields, from construction to government.

    Of note are two industries where the volume of service requests mostly increased: government and media, information, telecom & technology.

    With the global expansion of digital products and services through the pandemic, it’s no surprise to see volumes increase for media, information, telecom & technology. With government, the shift from on premises to rapid and large-scale hybrid or remote work for administrative and knowledge worker roles likely meant additional support from IT to equip employees and end users with the necessary tools to carry out work offsite.

    How has the volume of your service requests/incidents changed?

    The image contains a screenshot of a graph that demonstrates the volume of service requests/incidents changed.

    The transition to hybrid was worth the effort

    Hybrid and remote work have been associated with greater productivity and organizational benefits since before the pandemic. During emergency remote work, doubts arose about whether productivity would be maintained under such extreme circumstances and were quickly dispelled. The promise of remote productivity held up.

    Now, cautiously entering a “new normal,” the question has emerged again. Will long-term hybrid work bring the same benefits?

    The expectations have held up, with hybrid work benefits ranging from reduced facilities costs to greater employee performance.

    Organizational hybrid work may place additional strain on IT,
    but it is clear IT can handle the challenge. And when it does,
    the organizational benefits are tremendous.

    88% of respondents reported increased or consistent Infrastructure & Operations customer satisfaction scores.

    What benefits has the organization achieved as a result of moving to a hybrid work model?

    The image contains a bar graph that demonstrates the benefits of a hybrid work model.

    n=487

    Hybrid has sped up modernization of IT processes and infrastructure

    Of the organizations surveyed, the vast majority reported significant changes to both the process and the technology side of IT operations. Four key processes affected by the move to hybrid were:

    • Incident management
    • Service request support
    • Asset management
    • Change management

    Within Infrastructure & Operations, the area with the greatest degree
    of change was network architecture (reported by 44% of respondents), followed closely by service desk (41%) and recovery workspaces and mitigations (40%).

    63% of respondents reported changes to conference room technology to support hybrid meetings.

    n=496

    IT Infrastructure & Operations changes, upgrades, and modernization

    The image contains a screenshot of a bar graph that demonstrates IT Infrastructure & Operations Changes, Upgrades, and Modernizations.

    What process(es) had the highest degree of change in response to supporting hybrid work?

    The image contains a screenshot of a bar graph that demonstrates the highest degree of change in response to supporting hybrid work.

    Hybrid has permanently changed deployment strategy

    Forty-five percent of respondents reported significant changes to deployment as a result of hybrid work, with an additional 42% reporting minor changes. Only 13% of respondents stated that their deployment processes remained unchanged following the shift to hybrid work.

    With the ever-increasing globalization of business, deployment modernization practices such as the shift to zero touch are no longer optional or a bonus. They are a critical part of business operation that bring efficiency benefits beyond just supporting hybrid work.

    The deployment changes brought on by hybrid span across industries. Even in manufacturing, with the greatest proportion of respondents reporting “no change” to deployment practices (33%), most organizations experienced some degree of change.

    Has a hybrid work model led you to make any changes to your deployment, such as zero touch, to get equipment to end users?

    The image contains a graph to demonstrate if change was possible with hybrid models.

    Industry lens: Deployment changes

    Has a hybrid work model led you to make any changes to your deployment, such as zero touch, to get equipment to end users?

    The image contains a screenshot of a graph that demonstrates deployment changes at an industry lens.

    Hybrid work has accelerated organizational digitization

    Over half of respondents reported significantly decreased reliance on printed copies as a result of hybrid. While these changes were on the horizon for many organizations even before the pandemic, the necessity of keeping business operations running during lockdowns meant that critical resources could be invested in these processes. As a result, digitization has leapt forward.

    This represents an opportunity for businesses to re-evaluate their relationships with printing vendors. Resources spent on printing can be reduced or reallocated, representing additional savings as a result of moving to hybrid. Additionally, many respondents report a willingness – and ability – from vendors to partner with organizations in driving innovation and enabling digitization.

    With respect to changes pertaining to hard copies/printers as a result of your hybrid work model:

    The image contains a screenshot of a bar graph that demonstrates how hybrid work has accelerated organizational digitization.

    Hybrid work necessitates network and communications modernization

    The majority (63%) of respondents reported making significant changes to conference room technology as a result of hybrid work. A significant proportion (30%) report that such changes were not needed, but this includes organizations who had already set up remote communication.

    An important group is the remaining 8% of respondents, who cite budgetary restrictions as a key barrier in making the necessary technology upgrades. Ensure the business case for communication technology appropriately reflects the impact of these upgrades, and reduce the impact of legacy technology where possible:

    • Recognize not just meeting efficiency but also the impact on culture, engagement, morale, and external and internal clients.
    • Connect conference room tech modernization to the overall business goals and work it into the IT strategy.
    • Leverage the scheduling flexibility available in hybrid work arrangements to reduce reliance on inadequate conference technology by scheduling in-person meetings where possible and necessary.

    Have you made changes/upgrades
    to the conference room technology to support hybrid meetings?
    (E.g. Some participants joining remotely, some participants present in a conference room)

    The image contains a screenshot of a graph that demonstrates if network and communications modernization was needed.

    How we can help

    Metrics

    Resources

    Create a Work-From-Anywhere IT Strategy

    Stabilize Infrastructure & Operations During Work-From-Anywhere

    Sustain Work-From-Home in the New Normal

    Establish a Communication & Collaboration Systems Strategy

    Modernize the Network

    Simplify Remote Deployment With Zero-Touch Provisioning

    For a comprehensive list of resources, visit
    Info-Tech’s Hybrid Workplace Research Center

    02 PEOPLE

    IT and Its Employees

    Section 2

    Cultivate the dream team in a newly hybrid world

    In this section:

    1. What Hybrid Means for the IT Workforce
    2. Leadership for IT Hybrid Teams

    Hybrid means permanent change to how IT hires

    Since before the pandemic, the intangibles of having a job that works with your lifestyle have been steadily growing in importance. Considerations like flexible work options, work-life balance, and culture are more important to employees now than they were two years ago, and employers must adapt.

    Salary alone is no longer enough to recruit the best talent, nor is it the key to keeping employees engaged and productive. Hybrid work options are the single biggest concern for IT professionals seeking new employment, just edging out salary. This means employers must not offer just some work flexibility but truly embrace a hybrid environment.

    The image contains a screenshot of several graphs that compare results from 2019 to 2021 on what is important to employees.

    What are you considering when looking at a potential employer?

    The image contains a screenshot of a bar graph that demonstrates what needs to be considered when looking at a potential employer.

    A recession may not significantly impact hybrid work decisions overall

    Declining economic conditions suggest that a talent market shift may be imminent. Moving toward a recession may mean less competition for top talent, but this doesn't mean hybrid will be left behind as a recruitment tactic.

    Just over half of IT organizations surveyed are considering expanding hybrid work or moving to fully remote work even in a recession. Hybrid work is a critical enabler of organizational success when resources are scarce, due to the productivity benefits and cost savings it has demonstrated. Organizations that recognize this and adequately invest in hybrid tools now will have equipped themselves with an invaluable tool for weathering a recession storm, should one come.

    What impact could a potential recession in the coming year have on your decisions around your work location?

    The image contains a screenshot of a graph that demonstrates the potential impact of a recession.

    Hybrid work may help small organizations in a declining economy

    The potential for a recession has a greater impact on the workforce decisions of small organizations. They likely face greater financial pressures than medium and large-sized organizations, pressures that could necessitate halting recruitment efforts or holding firm on current salaries and health benefits.

    A reliance on intangible benefits, like the continuation of hybrid work, may help offset some of negative effects of such freezes, including the risk of lower employee engagement and productivity. Survey respondents indicated that hybrid work options (47%) were slightly more important to them than salary/compensation (46%) and significantly more important than benefits (29%), which could work in favor of small organizations in keeping the critical employees needed to survive an economic downturn.

    Small

    Medium Large
    90% 82% 66%

    Currently considering some form of hiring/salary freeze or cutbacks, if a recession occurs

    NOTES

    n=520

    Small: <101 employees

    Medium: 101-5000 employees

    Large: >5,000 employees

    Hybrid mitigates the main challenge of remote work

    One advantage of hybrid over remote work is the ability to maintain an in-office presence, which provides a failsafe should technology or other barriers stand in the way of effective distance communication. To take full advantage of this, teams should coordinate tasks with location, so that employees get the most out of the unique benefits of working in office and remotely.

    Activities to prioritize for in-office work:

    • Collaboration and brainstorming
    • Team-building activities
    • Introductions and onboarding

    Activities to prioritize for remote work:

    • Individual focus time

    As a leader, what are your greatest concerns with hybrid work?

    The image contains a bar graph that demonstrates concerns about hybrid work as an employer.

    Hybrid necessitates additional effort by managers

    When it comes to leading a hybrid team, there is no ignoring the impact of distance on communication and team cohesion. Among leaders’ top concerns are employee wellbeing and the ability to pick up on signs of demotivation among team members.

    The top two tactics used by managers to mitigate these concerns center on increasing communication:

    • Staying available through instant messaging.
    • Increasing team meetings.

    Tactics most used by highly effective IT departments

    The image contains a screenshot of tactics most used by highly effective IT departments.

    Team success is linked to the number of tools at the manager’s disposal

    The most effective hybrid team management tools focus on overcoming the greatest obstacle introduced by remote work: barriers to communication and connection.

    The most effective IT organizations use a variety of tactics. For managers looking to improve hybrid team effectiveness, the critical factor is less the tactic used and more the ability to adapt their approach to their team’s needs and incorporate team feedback. As such, IT effectiveness is linked to the total number of tactics used by managers.

    IT department effectiveness

    The image contains a screenshot of a graph that demonstrates IT department effectiveness.

    Autonomy is key to hybrid team success

    Not all hybrid work models are created equal. IT leaders working with hybrid teams have many decisions to make, from how many days will be spent in and out of office to how much control employees get over which days they work remotely.

    Employee and manager preferences are largely aligned regarding the number of days spent working remotely or onsite: Two to three days in office is the most selected option for both groups, although overall manager preferences lean slightly toward more time spent in office.

    Comparison of leader and employee preference for days in-office

    The image contains a screenshot of a graph that compares leader and employee preference for days in-office.

    Do employees have a choice in the days they work in office/offsite?

    The image contains a screenshot of a graph that demonstrates if employees have a choice in the days they work in office or offsite.

    For most organizations, employees get a choice of which days they spend working remotely. This autonomy can range from complete freedom to a choice between several pre-approved days depending on team scheduling needs.

    Work is still needed to increase autonomy in hybrid teams

    Organizations’ success in establishing hybrid team autonomy varies greatly post pandemic. Responses are roughly equally split between staff feeling more, less, or the same level of autonomy as before the pandemic. Evaluated in the context of most organizations continuing a hybrid approach, this leads to the conclusion that not all hybrid implementations are being conducted equally effectively when it comes to employee empowerment.

    As an employee, how much control do you have over the decisions related to where, when, and how you work currently?

    The image contains a screenshot of a graph that demonstrates autonomy in hybrid teams.

    Connectedness in hybrid teams lags behind

    A strong case can be made for fostering autonomy and empowerment on hybrid teams. Employees who report lower levels of control than before the pandemic also report lower engagement indicators, such as trust in senior leadership, motivation, and intention to stay with the organization. On the other hand, employees experiencing increased levels of control report gains in these areas.

    The only exception to these gains is the sense of team connectedness, which employees experiencing more control report as lower than before the pandemic. A greater sense of connectedness among employees reporting decreased control may be related to more mandatory in-office time or a sense of connection over shared team-level disengagement.

    These findings reinforce the need for hybrid teams to invest in team building and communication practices and confirm that significant benefits are to be had when a sense of autonomy can be successfully instilled.

    Employees who experience less control than before the pandemic report lowered engagement indicators ... except sense of connectedness

    The image contains a screenshot of a graph that demonstrates less control, means lowered engagement.

    Employees who experience more control than before the pandemic report increased engagement indicators ... except sense of connectedness

    The image contains a screenshot of a graph that demonstrates more control, means increased engagement.

    Case study: Hybrid work at Microsoft Canada

    The Power of Intentionality

    When the pandemic hit, technology was not in question. Flexible work options had been available and widely used, and the technology to support them was in place.

    The leadership team turned their focus to ensuring their culture survived and thrived. They developed a laser-focused approach for engaging their employees by giving their leaders tools to hold conversations. The dialogue was ongoing to allow the organization to adapt to the fast pace of changing conditions.

    Every tactic, plan, and communication started with the question, “What outcome are we striving for?”

    With a clear outcome, tools were created and leaders supported to drive the desired outcome.

    “We knew we had the technology in place. Our concern was around maintaining our strong culture and ensuring continued engagement and connection with our employees.”

    Lisa Gibson, Chief of Staff, Microsoft Canada

    How we can help

    Metrics

    Resources

    Webinar: Effectively Manage Remote Teams

    Build a Better Manager: Manage Your People

    Info-Tech Leadership Training

    Adapt Your Onboarding Process to a Virtual Environment

    Virtual Meeting Primer

    For a comprehensive list of resources, visit
    Info-Tech’s Hybrid Workplace Research Center

    Recommendations

    The last two years have been a great experiment, but it’s not over.

    BE INTENTIONAL

    • Build a team charter on how and when to communicate.
    • Create necessary tools/templates.

    INVOLVE EMPLOYEES

    • Conduct surveys and focus groups.
      Have conversations to understand sentiment.

    ALLOW CHOICE

    • Provide freedom for employees to have some level of choice in hybrid arrangements.

    BE TRANSPARENT

    • Disclose the rationale.
    • Share criteria and decision making.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Hybrid and remote teams require more attention, connection, and leadership from managers. The shift from doing the day-to-day to effectively leading is critical for the success of nontraditional work models. As hybrid and remote work become engrained in society, organizations must ensure that the concept of the “working manager” is as obsolete as the rotary telephone.

    Bibliography

    “8 Unexpected Benefits of Online Learning for Development.” Center for Creative Leadership (CCL), 14 Oct. 2020. Accessed 5 Nov. 2021.
    “2021 Global Workplace Report.” NTT, 2021. Accessed 6 July 2022.
    “Advantages of Online Learning for Leadership Development: What Our Research Says.” CCL, 8 Dec. 2020. 5 Nov. 2021.
    “Annual Work Trend Index Report – Great Expectations: Making Hybrid Work Work.” Microsoft WorkLab, 2022. Accessed 6 July 2022.
    Aten, Jason. “Google’s Employees Return to the Office Today. This Former Exec Says Hybrid Work Won’t Last.” Inc.Com, 4 April 2022. Web.
    Bariso, Justin. “Google Spent 2 Years Researching What Makes a Great Remote Team. It Came Up With These 3 Things.” Inc.Com, 8 April 2019. Web.
    Berger, Chloe. “What Is ‘Hybrid Guilt’? Going to Office Part-Time May Be Worst Option.” Fortune, 22 Aug. 2022. Web.
    Brodkin, Jon. “After Remote-Work Ultimatum, Musk Reveals Plan to Cut 10% of Tesla Jobs.” Ars Technica, 3 June 2022. Web.
    Brown, Brené, host. “Brené with Scott Sonenshein on Why We’ll Never Be the Same Again (and Why It’s Time to Talk About It).” Dare to Lead with Brené Brown, 11 April 2022. Brené Brown, https://brenebrown.com/podcast/why-well-never-be-the-same-again-and-why-its-time-to-talk-about-it/.
    Burgess, Mark. “Most Asset Managers Operating Under Hybrid Work Model: Survey.” Advisor’s Edge, 13 Sept. 2022. Web.
    Caminiti, Susan. “Workers Want Hybrid but Say It’s Exhausting Them. Here’s How Companies Can Fix That.” CNBC, 8 Feb. 2022. Web.
    Capossela, Chris. “The next Chapter of Our Hybrid Workplace: Update on Our Washington State Work Sites.” The Official Microsoft Blog, 14 Feb. 2022. Web.
    Carrigan, John. “Meta Embraces ‘Work From Anywhere’ Ahead of Return to Office.” Human Resources Director, 25 March 2022. Web.
    Chaturvedi, H., and Ajoy Kumar Dey. The New Normal: Reinventing Professional Life and Familial Bonding in the Post COVID 19 Era. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2021.
    Commonwealth of Massachusetts. “Alternative Work Options.” Mass.Gov, n.d. Accessed 17 Sept. 2022.
    Commonwealth of Massachusetts. “Hybrid Work for Commonwealth Employees.” Mass.Gov, n.d. Accessed 17 Sept. 2022.
    “COVID-19 and the Future of Business.” IBM, 21 Sept. 2020. Web.
    Daniel, Will. “The Layoffs at Tesla Show That White-Collar Workers Are Screwed, Hedge Funder Famous from ‘The Big Short’ Predicts.” Fortune, 29 June 2022. Web.
    D’Auria, Gemma, and Aaron De Smet. “Leadership in a Crisis: Responding to Coronavirus.” McKinsey, 16 March 2020. Web.
    Dave, Paresh. “Google Mandates Workers Back to Silicon Valley, Other Offices from April 4.” Reuters, 3 March. 2022. Web.
    Delaney, Kevin. “What We Know Now About the Business Impact of Hybrid Work.” Time, 6 Sept. 2022. Web.
    Dobson, Sarah. “Legal Considerations for Hybrid Work.” Canadian HR Reporter, 15 Sept. 2022. Web.
    Dondo, Jean. “Hybrid Work Is the Way for More Than a Quarter of Canadian Investment Firms.” Wealth Professional, 14 Sept. 2022. Web.
    Elias, Jennifer. “Twitter to Reopen Offices March 15, Though Remote Work Remains an Option.” CNBC, 3 March 2022. Web.
    Esade Business & Law School. “Leadership After Covid-19: Learning To Navigate The Unknown Unknowns.” Forbes, 30 March 2021. Web.
    “Famous Companies Without Offices.” The Hoxton Mix, 19 Oct. 2021. Web.
    Gerdeman, Dina. “COVID Killed the Traditional Workplace. What Should Companies Do Now?” HBS Working Knowledge, 8 March 2021. Web.
    Gleason, Mike. “Apple’s Hybrid Work Plans Draw Worker Pushback.” SearchUnifiedCommunications, TechTarget, 24 Aug. 2022. Web.
    Gleeson, Brent. “13 Tips For Leading And Managing Remote Teams.” Forbes, 26 Aug. 2020. Web.
    Gratton, Lynda. “How to Do Hybrid Right.” Harvard Business Review, 1 May 2021. Web.
    “Guide: Understand team effectiveness.” re:Work, Google, n.d. Accessed 5 Nov. 2021.
    Hardy, Karen. “Your Business Has Decided on Hybrid Work… Now What?” CIO, 12 Sept. 2022. Web.
    Hirsch, Arlene S. “How to Boost Employee Performance in a Hybrid Work Environment.” SHRM, 6 Sept. 2022. Web.
    “How to Get Hybrid Work Right.” CBRE Canada, 14 June 2022. Web.
    “Hybrid Work: When Freedom Benefits from Rules.” Audi, 12 Sept. 2022. Accessed 18 Sept. 2022.
    “Hybrid Workplace | Global Culture Report.” O.C. Tanner, 2022, Web.
    “Intel Is Hiring for Various Roles with Temporary Remote Work Benefits.” SightsIn Plus, 11 June 2022. Web.
    Iyer, Viswanathan. “Council Post: Hybrid Work: Beyond The Point Of No Return.” Forbes, 14 Sept. 2022. Web.
    Johnson, Ricardo. “Securing Hybrid Work All Starts with Zero-Trust.” SC Media, 29 Aug. 2022. Web.
    Jones, Jada. “The Rules of Work Are Changing, and Hybrid Work Is Winning.” ZDNET, 1 Sept. 2022. Web.
    Kowitt, Beth. “Inside Google’s Push to Nail Hybrid Work and Bring Its 165,000-Person Workforce Back to the Office Part-Time.” Fortune, 17 May 2022. Web.
    Kumra, Gautam, and Diaan-Yi Lin. “The Future of (Hybrid) Work.” McKinsey, 2 Sept. 2022. Web.
    Lagowska, Urszula, et al. “Leadership under Crises: A Research Agenda for the Post-COVID-19 Era.” Brazilian Administration Review, vol. 17, no. 2, Aug. 2020. Web.
    Larson, Barbara Z., et al. “A Guide to Managing Your (Newly) Remote Workers.” Harvard Business Review, 18 March 2020. Web.
    “Leadership During COVID-19: Resources for Times of Uncertainty.” CCL, n.d. Accessed 5 Nov. 2021.
    “Managing Remote Employees: How to Lead From a Distance.” CCL, 7 April 2020. Accessed 5 Nov. 2021.
    “Managing Remote Teams.” Know Your Team, n.d. Web. Accessed 5 Nov. 2021.
    Mayhem, Julian. “Virtual Leadership - Essential Skills for Managing Remote Teams.” VirtualSpeech, 4 Nov. 2020. Web.
    McKendrick, Joe. “Keeping Hybrid Workers In Sync, Digitally And In-Person.” Forbes, 22 Aug. 2022. Web.
    McKenna, Karissa, et al. “Webinar: Build Leadership Skills for the New World of Work.” CCL, 15 June 2020. Accessed 5 Nov. 2021.
    Mearian, Lucas. “Microsoft Edges Back to ‘Normal’ with Workplace Reopening Plan.” Computerworld, 14 Feb. 2022. Web.
    “Meta Careers.” Meta, n.d. Accessed 17 Sept. 2022.
    Miller, Mark. “5 Tips to Make Your Hybrid Work Model More Effective.” Entrepreneur, 25 Aug. 2022. Web.
    Nica, Irina. “How to Manage a Remote Team: 14 Effective Tips for Your Business.” Business 2 Community, 8 July 2021. Web.
    O’Halloran, Joe. “Organisations Struggle to Support IT in a Hybrid Work Model.” ComputerWeekly.com, 17 June 2022. Web.
    Ong, Ivan. “Council Post: Why Hybrid Work Is The Way To Go.” Forbes, 12 Sept. 2022. Web.
    Osborne, Charlie. “The End of Fully Remote Work? Google Begins Shift to the Hybrid Office.” ZDNet. 3 March 2022. Web.
    Pazzanese, Christina. “Back to Office? Stay Remote? Go Hybrid?” Harvard Gazette, 24 Aug. 2022. Web.
    “PinFlex.” Pinterest Careers, n.d. Accessed 17 Sept. 2022.
    Rand, Ben. “Does Hybrid Work Actually Work? Insights from 30,000 Emails.” Harvard Business School – Working Knowledge, 6 Sept. 2022. Web.
    “Remote Locations, Working with Flexibility.” Amazon.jobs, n.d. Accessed 17 Sept. 2022.
    Renjen, Punit. “The Heart of Resilient Leadership: Responding to COVID-19.” Deloitte Insights, 16 March 2020. Web.
    Shih, Clara. “Keeping Hybrid Employees Engaged.” Harvard Business Review, 11 Aug. 2022. Web.
    Singerman, Michelle. “Is the Hybrid Work Model Working? CPAs Spill the Beans.” Chartered Professional Accountants Canada, 24 Aug. 2022. Web.
    Stern, Stefan. “Hybrid Working: Why the Office-Home Balance Is Still a Challenge.” Financial Times, 4 Sept. 2022.
    Subramaniam, Vanmala, et al. “Ready to Go Back to the Office? Employers and Workers Are Divided over the Fate of Remote Work.” The Globe and Mail, 1 Sept. 2022. Web.
    Tong, Goh Chiew. “Inflation and Hybrid Work ‘skyrocketed’ Demand for Flexible Workspace, WeWork Says.” CNBC, 6 Sept. 2022. Web.
    Tsipursky, Gleb. “Commentary: The Psychology behind Why Some Leaders Are Resisting a Hybrid Work Model.” Fortune, 8 June 2021. Web.
    Turner, Jack. “Tesla Doubles Down on Remote Working Ban, Tracks Office Attendance.” Tech.Co, 3 July 2022. Web.
    “Virtual Leadership Styles for Remote Businesses.” Maryville Online, 4 Feb. 2021. Web.
    “Webinar: How Leaders Can Build Organizational Resilience.” CCL, 15 June 2020. Accessed 5 Nov. 2021.
    “Why GitLab Uses the Term All-Remote to Describe Its 100% Remote Workforce.” GitLab, 2022. Accessed 17 Sept. 2022.
    Wigert, Ben, and Sangeeta Agrawal. “Returning to the Office: The Current, Preferred and Future State of Remote Work.” Gallup, 31 Aug. 2022. Web.
    Wingard, Jason. “Elon Musk’s Big Bet Against Remote Work: Will Tesla Win?” Forbes, 4 June 2022. Web.

    Data and Analytics Trends 2023

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}208|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve.
    • member rating average days saved: Read what our members are saying
    • Parent Category Name: Business Intelligence Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /business-intelligence-strategy

    Data is a unique resource that keeps growing, presenting opportunities along the way. CIOs and IT leaders can use rapidly evolving technologies and capabilities to harness this data and its value for the organization.

    IT leaders must prepare their teams and operations with the right knowledge, capabilities, and strategies to make sure they remain competitive in 2023 and beyond. Nine trends that expand on the three common Vs of data – volume, velocity, and variety – can help guide the way.

    Focus on trends that align with your opportunities and challenges

    The path to becoming more competitive in a data-driven economy differs from one company to the next. IT leaders should use the data and analytics trends that align most with their organizational goals and can lead to positive business outcomes.

    1. Prioritize your investments: Conduct market analysis and prioritize the data and analytics investments that will be critical to your business.
    2. Build a robust strategy: Identify a clear path between your data vision and business outcomes to build a strategy that’s a good fit for your organization.
    3. Inspire practical innovation: Follow a pragmatic approach to implementing trends that range from data gravity and democratization to data monetization and augmented analytics.

    Data and Analytics Trends 2023 Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Data and Analytics Trends Report 2023 – A report that explores nine data use cases for emerging technologies that can improve on capabilities needed to compete in the data-driven economy.

    Data technologies are rapidly evolving. Understanding data's art of the possible is critical. However, to adapt to these upcoming data trends, a solid data management foundation is required. This report explores nine data trends based on the proven framework of data V's: Volume, Velocity, Variety, Veracity, Value, Virtue, Visualization, Virality, and Viscosity.

    • Data and Analytics Trends Report 2023
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Data and Analytics Trends Report 2023

    SOONER OR LATER, YOU WILL BE IN THE DATA BUSINESS!

    Nine Data Trends for 2023

    In this report, we explore nine data use cases for emerging technologies that can improve on capabilities needed to compete in the data-driven economy. Use cases combine emerging data trends and modernization of existing capabilities.

    1. VOLUME
      • Data Gravity
    2. VELOCITY
    • Democratizing Real-Time Data
  • VARIETY
    • Augmented Data Management
  • VERACITY
    • Identity Authenticity
  • VALUE
    • Data Monetization
  • VIRTUE
    • Adaptive Data Governance
  • VISUALIZATION
    • AI-Driven Storytelling & Augmented Analytics
  • VIRALITY
    • Data Marketplace
  • VISCOSITY
    • DevOps – DataOps – XOps

    VOLUME

    Data Gravity

    Trend 01 Demand for storage and bandwidth continues to grow

    When organizations begin to prioritize data, they first consider the sheer volume of data, which will influence data system design. Your data systems must consider the existing and growing volume of data by assessing industry initiatives such as digital transformation, Industry 4.0, IoT, consumer digital footprint, etc.

    The largest data center in the world is a citadel in Reno, Nevada, that stretches over 7.2 million square feet!

    Source: Cloudwards, 2022

    IoT devices will generate 79.4 zettabytes of data
    by 2025.

    Source: IDC, 2019

    There were about 97
    zettabytes of data generated worldwide in 2022.

    Source: “Volume of Data,” Statista, 2022

    VOLUME

    Data Gravity

    Data attracts more data and an ecosystem of applications and services

    SharePoint, OneDrive, Google Drive, and Dropbox offer APIs and integration opportunities for developers to enhance their products.

    Social media platforms thought about this early by allowing for an ecosystem of filters, apps, games, and effects that engage their users with little to no additional effort from internal resources.

    The image contains four logos. SharePoint, OneDrive, Google Drive, and Dropbox.

    VOLUME

    Data Gravity

    Focus on data gravity and avoid cloud repatriation

    Data gravity is the tendency of data to attract applications, services, and other data. A growing number of cloud migration decisions will be made based on the data gravity concept. It will become increasingly important in data strategies, with failure potentially resulting in costly cloud repatriations.

    Emerging technologies and capabilities:

    Data Lakehouse, Data Mesh, Data Fabric, Hybrid Data, Cloud Data, Edge Computing

    47%

    Centralized cloud storage going down in 2 years

    22%
    25%

    Hybrid storage (centralized + edge) going up in 2 years

    47%

    Source: CIO, 2022

    VOLUME

    Data Gravity

    What worked for terabytes is ineffective for petabytes

    When compared to on-premises infrastructure, cloud computing is less expensive and easier to implement. However, poor data replication and data gravity can significantly increase cloud costs to the point of failure. Data gravity will help organizations make better cloud migration decisions.

    It is also critical to recognize changes in the industry landscape. The goal of data processing and analytics is to generate the right data for users to act on. In most cases, the user is a human being, but in the case of autonomous driving (AD), the car takes on the role of the user (DXC Technology).

    To avoid cloud repatriation, it will become prudent for all organizations to consider data gravity and the timing of cloud migration.

    The image contains a diagram on data gravity.

    VELOCITY

    Democratizing Real-Time Data

    Trend 02 Real-time analytics presents an important differentiator

    The velocity element of data can be assessed from two standpoints: the speed at which data is being generated and how fast the organization needs to respond to the incoming information through capture, analysis, and use. Traditionally data was processed in a batch format (all at once or in incremental nightly data loads). There is a growing demand to process data continuously using streaming data-processing techniques.

    Emerging technologies and capabilities:

    Edge Computing

    Google announced it has a quantum computer that is 100 million times faster than any classical computer in its lab.

    Source: Science Alert, 2015

    The number of qubits in quantum computers has been increasing dramatically, from 2 qubits in 1998 to 128 qubits in 2019.

    Source: Statista, 2019

    IBM released a 433-qubit quantum chip named Osprey in 2022 and expects to surpass 1,000 qubits with its next chip, Condor, in 2023.

    Source: Nature, 2023

    VELOCITY

    Democratizing Real-Time Data

    Make data accessible to everyone in real time

    • 90% of an organization’s data is replicated or redundant.
    • Build API and web services that allow for live access to data.
    • Most social media platforms, like Twitter and Facebook, have APIs that offer access to incredible amounts of data and insights.

    VELOCITY

    Democratizing Real-Time Data

    Trend in Data Velocity

    Data democratization means data is widely accessible to all stakeholders without bottlenecks or barriers. Success in data democratization comes with ubiquitous real-time analytics. Google highlights a need to address democratization in two different frames:

    1. Democratizing stream analytics for all businesses to ensure real-time data at the company level.
    2. Democratizing stream analytics for all personas and the ability of all users to generate real-time insights.

    Emerging technologies and capabilities:

    Data Lakehouse, Streaming API Ecosystem, Industry 4.0, Zero-Copy Cloning

    Nearly 70% of all new vehicles globally will be connected to the internet by 2023.

    Source: “Connected light-duty vehicles,” Statista, 2022

    VELOCITY

    Democratizing Real-Time Data

    Enable real-time processing with API

    In the past, data democratization has largely translated into a free data set and open data portals. This has allowed the government to freely share data with the public. Also, the data science community has embraced the availability of large data sets such as weather data, stock data, etc. In the future, more focus will be on the combination of IoT and steaming analytics, which will provide better responsiveness and agility.

    Many researchers, media companies, and organizations now have easy access to the Twitter/Facebook API platform to study various aspects of human behavior and sentiments. Large technology companies have already democratized their data using real-time APIs.

    Thousands of sources for open data are available at your local municipalities alone.

    6G will push Wi-Fi connectivity to 1 terabyte per second! This is expected to become commercially available by 2030.

    VARIETY

    Augmented Data Management

    Trend 03 Need to manage unstructured data

    The variety of data types is increasingly diverse. Structured data often comes from relational databases, while unstructured data comes from several sources such as photos, video, text documents, cell phones, etc. The variety of data is where technology can drive business value. However, unstructured data also poses a risk, especially for external data.

    The number of IoT devices could rise to 30.9 billion by 2025.

    Source: “IoT and Non-IoT Connections Worldwide,” Statista, 2022

    The global edge computing market is expected to reach $250.6 billion by 2024.

    Source: “Edge Computing,” Statista, 2022

    Genomics research is expected to generate between 2 and 40 exabytes of data within the next decade.

    Source: NIH, 2022

    VARIETY

    Augmented Data Management

    Employ AI to automate data management

    New tools will enhance many aspects of data management:

    • Data preparation, integration, cataloging, and quality
    • Metadata management
    • Master data management

    Enabling AI-assisted decision-making tools

    The image contains logos of the AI-assisted decision-making tools. Informatica, collibra, OCTOPAI.

    VARIETY

    Augmented Data Management

    Trend in Data Variety

    Augmented data management will enhance or automate data management capabilities by leveraging AI and related advanced techniques. It is quite possible to leverage existing data management tools and techniques, but most experts have recognized that more work and advanced patterns are needed to solve many complex data problems.

    Emerging technologies and capabilities:

    Data Factory, Data Mesh, Data Fabric, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning

    VARIETY

    Augmented Data Management

    Data Fabric vs. Data Mesh: The Data Journey continues at an accelerated pace

    Data Fabric

    Data Mesh

    Data fabric is an architecture that facilitates the end-to-end integration of various data pipelines and cloud environments using intelligent and automated systems. It’s a data integration pattern to unify disparate data systems, embed governance, strengthen security and privacy measures, and provide more data accessibility to workers and particularly to business users.

    The data mesh architecture is an approach that aligns data sources by business domains, or functions, with data owners. With data ownership decentralization, data owners can create data products for their respective domains, meaning data consumers, both data scientists and business users, can use a combination of these data products for data analytics and data science.

    More Unstructured Data

    95% of businesses cite the need to manage unstructured data as a problem for their business.

    VERACITY

    Identity Authenticity

    Trend 04 Veracity of data is a true test of your data capabilities

    Data veracity is defined as the accuracy or truthfulness of a data set. More and more data is created in semi-structured and unstructured formats and originates from largely uncontrolled sources (e.g. social media platforms, external sources). The reliability and quality of the data being integrated should be a top concern. The veracity of data is imperative when looking to use data for predictive purposes. For example, energy companies rely heavily on weather patterns to optimize their service outputs, but weather patterns have an element of unpredictability.

    Data quality affects overall labor productivity by as much as 20%, and 30% of operating expenses are due to insufficient data.

    Source: Pragmatic Works, 2017

    Bad data costs up to
    15% to 25% of revenue.

    Source: MIT Sloan Management Review, 2017

    VERACITY

    Identity Authenticity

    Veracity of data is a true test of your data capabilities

    • Stop creating your own identity architectures and instead integrate a tried-and-true platform.
    • Aim for a single source of truth for digital identity.
    • Establish data governance that can withstand scrutiny.
    • Imagine a day in the future where verified accounts on social media platforms are available.
    • Zero-trust architecture should be used.

    VERACITY

    Identity Authenticity

    Trend in Data Veracity

    Veracity is a concept deeply linked to identity. As the value of the data increases, a greater degree of veracity is required: We must provide more proof to open a bank account than to make friends on Facebook. As a result, there is more trust in bank data than in Facebook data. There is also a growing need to protect marginalized communities.

    Emerging technologies and capabilities:

    Zero Trust, Blockchain, Data Governance, IoT, Cybersecurity

    The image contains a screenshot of Info-Tech's blueprint slide on Zero Trust.

    VERACITY

    Identity Authenticity

    The identity discussion is no longer limited to people or organizations. The development of new technologies, such as the IoT phenomenon, will lead to an explosion of objects, from refrigerators to shipping containers, coming online as well. If all these entities start communicating with each other, standards will be needed to establish who or what they are.

    IDENTITY
    IS

    Age

    Gender

    Address

    Fingerprint

    Face

    Voice

    Irises

    IDENTITY
    KNOWS

    Password

    Passphrase

    PIN

    Sequence

    IDENTITY
    HAS

    Access badge

    Smartcard

    Security token

    Mobile phone

    ID document

    IDENTITY
    DOES

    Motor skills

    Handwriting

    Gestures

    Keystrokes

    Applications use

    The IoT market is expected to grow 18% to 14.4 billion in 2022 and 27 billion by 2025.

    Source: IoT Analytics, 2022

    VALUE

    Data Monetization

    Trend 05 Not Many organization know the true value of their data

    Data can be valuable if used effectively or dangerous if mishandled. The rise of the data economy has created significant opportunities but also has its challenges. It has become urgent to understand the value of data, which may vary for stakeholders based on their business model and strategy. Organizations first need to understand ownership of their data by establishing a data strategy, then they must improve data maturity by developing a deeper understanding of data value.

    94% of enterprises say data is essential to business growth.

    Source: Find stack, 2021

    VALUE

    Data Monetization

    Start developing your data business

    • Blockbuster ran its business well, but Netflix transformed the video rental industry overnight!
    • Big players with data are catching up fast.
    • You don’t have to be a giant to monetize data.
    • Data monetization is probably closer than you think.
    • You simply need to find it, catalog it, and deliver it.

    The image contains logos of companies related to data monetization as described in the text above. The companies are Amazon Prime, Netflix, Disney Plus, Blockbuster, and Apple TV.

    VALUE

    Data Monetization

    Trend in Data Value

    Data monetization is the transformation of data into financial value. However, this does not imply selling data alone. Monetary value is produced by using data to improve and upgrade existing and new products and services. Data monetization demands an organization-wide strategy for value development.

    Emerging technologies and capabilities:

    Data Strategy, Data Monetization Strategy, Data Products

    Netflix uses big data to save $1 billion per year on customer retention.

    Source: Logidots, 2021

    VALUE

    Data Monetization

    Data is a strategic asset

    Data is beyond currency, assets, or commodities and needs to be a category
    of its own.

    • Data always outlives people, processes, and technology. They all come and go while data remains.
    • Oil is a limited resource. Data is not. Unlike oil, data is likely to grow over time.
    • Data is likely to outlast all other current popular financial instruments, including currency, assets, or commodities.
    • Data is used internally and externally and can easily be replicated or combined.

    Data monetization is currently in the speculative territory, which is unacceptable. It should instead be guided by sound data management theory.

    VIRTUE

    Adaptive Data Governance

    Trend 06 Five Core Virtues: Resilience, Humility, Grit, Liberal Education, Empathy (Forbes, 2020)

    We have become more and more dependent on data, analytics, and organizational protection policies. Data virtue is about leveraging data securely and ethically. This topic has become more critical with the advent of GDPR, the right to be forgotten, and related regulations. Data governance, which seeks to establish an oversight framework that manages the creation, acquisition, integrity, security, compliance, and quality of data, is essential for any organization that makes decisions about data.

    Cultural obstacles are the greatest barrier to becoming data-driven, according to 91.9% of executives.

    Source: Harvard Business Review, 2022

    Fifty million Facebook profiles were harvested for Cambridge Analytica in a major data breach.

    Source: The Guardian, 2018

    VIRTUE

    Adaptive Data Governance

    Encourage noninvasive and automated data governance

    • Data governance affects the entire organization, not just data.
    • The old model for data governance was slow and clumsy.
    • Adaptive data governance encourages faster decision making and a more collaborative approach to governance.
    • Agile data governance allows for faster and more flexible decision making.
    • Automated data governance will simplify execution across the organization.
    • It is great for compliance, quality, impact tracking, and cross-referencing and offers independence to data users.

    VIRTUE

    Adaptive Data Governance

    Trend in Data Virtue

    Adaptive data governance encourages a flexible approach that allows an organization to employ multiple data governance strategies depending on changing business situations. The other aspect of adaptive data governance is moving away from manual (and often slow) data governance and toward aggressive automation.

    Emerging technologies and capabilities:

    AI-Powered Data Catalog and Metadata Management,
    Automated Data Policy Enforcement

    “To effectively meet the needs and velocity of digital organizations and modern practices, IT governance must be embedded and automated where possible to drive success and value.”

    Source: Valence Howden, Info-Tech Research Group

    “Research reveals that the combination of AI and big data technologies can automate almost 80% of all physical work, 70% of data processing, and 64% of data collection tasks.”

    Source: Forbes, 2021

    VIRTUE

    Data Governance Automation

    Simple and easy Data Governance

    Tools are not the ultimate answer to implementing data governance. You will still need to secure stakeholders' buy-in and engagement in the data process. Data governance automation should be about simplifying the execution of roles and responsibilities.

    “When you can see where your data governance strategy can be improved, it’s time to put in place automation that help to streamline processes.”

    Source: Nintex, 2021

    VISUALIZATION

    AI-Driven Storytelling & Augmented Analytics

    Trend 07 Automated and augmented data storytelling is not that far away

    Today, data storytelling is led by the user. It’s the manual practice of combining narrative with data to deliver insights in a compelling form to assist decision makers in engaging with data and analytics. A story backed by data is more easily consumed and understood than a dashboard, which can be overwhelming. However, manual data storytelling has some major shortcomings.

    Problem # 1: Telling stories on more than just the insights noticed by people

    Problem # 2: Poor data literacy and the limitations of manual self-service

    Problem # 3: Scaling data storytelling across the business

    VISUALIZATION

    AI-Driven Storytelling & Augmented Analytics

    Use AI to enhance data storytelling

    • Tableau, Power BI, and many other applications already use
      AI-driven analytics.
    • Power BI and SharePoint can use AI to generate visuals for any SharePoint list in a matter of seconds.

    VISUALIZATION

    AI-Driven Storytelling & Augmented Analytics

    Trend in Data Visualization

    AI and natural language processing will drive future visualization and data storytelling. These tools and techniques are improving rapidly and are now designed in a streamlined way to guide people in understanding what their data means and how to act on it instead of expecting them to do self-service analysis with dashboards and charts and know what to do next. Ultimately, being able to understand how to translate emotion, tropes, personal interpretation, and experience and how to tell what’s most relevant to each user is the next frontier for augmented and automated analytics

    Emerging technologies and capabilities:

    AI-Powered Data Catalog and Metadata Management,
    Automated Data Policy Enforcement

    VISUALIZATION

    Data Storytelling

    Augmented data storytelling is not that far away

    Emotions are a cornerstone of human intelligence and decision making. Mastering the art of storytelling is not easy.

    Industry experts predict the combination of data storytelling with augmented and automated techniques; these capabilities are more than capable of generating and automating parts of a data story’s creation for end users.

    The next challenge for AI is translating emotion, tropes, personal interpretation, and experience into what is most essential to end users.

    Source: Yellowfin, 2021

    VIRALITY

    Data Marketplace

    Trend 08 Missing data marketplace

    Data virality measures data spread and popularity. However, for data virality to occur, an ecosystem comparable to that of traditional or modern digital marketplaces is required. Organizations must reevaluate their data strategies to ensure investment in appropriate data domains by understanding data virality. Data virality is the exact opposite of dark data.

    Dark data is “all the information companies collect in their regular business processes, don’t use, have no plans to use, but will never throw out.”

    Source: Forbes, 2019

    VIRALITY

    Data Marketplace

    Make data easily accessible

    • Making data accessible to a broader audience is the key to successful virality.
    • Data marketplaces provide a location for you to make your data public.
    • Why do this? Contributing to public data marketplaces builds credibility, just like contributing to public GitHub projects.
    • Big players like Microsoft, Amazon, and Snowflake already do this!
    • Snowflake introduced zero-copy cloning, which allows users to interact with source data without compromising the integrity of the original source.

    The image contains the logos of Microsoft, Amazon, and Snowflake.

    VIRALITY

    Data Marketplace

    Trend in Data Virality

    The data marketplace can be defined as a dynamic marketplace where users decide what has the most value. Companies can gauge which data is most popular based on usage and decide where to invest. Users can shop for data products within the marketplace and then join these products with other ones they’ve created to launch truly powerful data-driven projects.

    Emerging technologies and capabilities:

    AI-Powered Data Catalog and Metadata Management,
    Automated Data Policy Enforcement

    The image contains a screenshot of Info-Tech's Data-as-a-Service (DaaS) Framework.

    “Data is like garbage. You’d better know what you are going to do with it before you collect it.”

    – Mark Twain

    VIRALITY

    Data Marketplace

    Journey from siloed data platforms to dynamic data marketplaces

    Data remains a complex topic due to many missing foundational components and infrastructure. Interoperability, security, quality, discoverability, speed, and ease are some of those missing foundational components that most organizations face daily.

    Data lacks an ecosystem that is comparable to those of traditional assets or commodities. Data must be available in open or closed data marketplaces to measure its value. These data marketplaces are still in their infancy.

    “Data markets are an important component of the data economy that could unleash the full potential of data generated by the digital economy and human activity in general.”

    Source: ITU Journal, 2018

    VISCOSITY

    DevOps – DataOps – XOps

    Trend 09 Increase efficiency by removing bottlenecks

    Compared to water, a fluid with a high viscosity flows more slowly, like honey. Data viscosity measures the resistance to flow in a volume of data. The data resistance may come from other Vs (variety, velocity, etc.).

    VISCOSITY

    DevOps – DataOps – XOps

    Increase efficiency by removing bottlenecks

    Consider XOps for a second. It makes no difference what X is. What's important is matching operational requirements to enterprise capabilities.

    • For example, Operations must meet the demands of Sales – hence SalesOps
      or S&Op.
    • Development resources must meet the demands of Operations – hence DevOps.
    • Finally, Data must also meet the demand of Operations.

    These Operations guys are demanding!!

    VISCOSITY

    DevOps – DataOps – XOps

    Trend in Data Viscosity

    The merger of development (Dev) and IT Operations (Ops) started in software development with the concept of DevOps. Since then, new Ops terms have formed rapidly (AIOps, MLOps, ModelOps, PlatformOps, SalesOps, SecOps, etc.). All these methodologies come from Lean manufacturing principles, which seek to identify waste by focusing on eliminating errors, cycle time, collaboration, and measurement. Buzzwords are distractions, and the focus must be on the underlying goals and principles. XOps goals should include the elimination of errors and improving efficiencies.

    Emerging technologies and capabilities:

    Collaborative Data Management, Automation Tools

    VISCOSITY

    DataOps → Data Observability

    Data observability, a subcomponent of DataOps, is a set of technical practices, cultural norms, and architecture that enables low error rates. Data observability focuses on error rates instead of only measuring data quality at a single point in time.

    Data Quality Dimensions

    • Uniqueness
    • Timeliness
    • Validity
    • Accuracy
    • Consistency

    ERROR RATES

    Lateness: Missing Your SLA

    System Processing Issues

    Code Change That Broke Something

    Data Quality

    What’s next? Go beyond the buzzwords.

    Avoid following trends solely for the sake of following them. It is critical to comprehend the concept and apply it to your industry. Every industry has its own set of problems and opportunities.

    Highlight the data trends (or lack thereof) that have been most beneficial to you in your organizations. Follow Info-Tech’s approach to building a data practice and platform to develop your data capabilities through the establishment of data goals.

    The image contains a screenshot of Info-Tech's Build Your Data Pracrice and Platform.

    Research Authors

    Rajesh Parab Chris Dyck

    Rajesh Parab

    Director, Research & Advisory

    Data and Analytics

    Chris Dyck

    Research Lead

    Data and Analytics

    “Data technologies are rapidly evolving. Understanding what’s possible is critical. Adapting to these upcoming data trends requires a solid data management foundation.”

    – Rajesh Parab

    Contributing Experts

    Carlos Thomas John Walsh

    Carlos Thomas

    Executive Counselor

    Info-Tech Research Group

    John Walsh

    Executive Counselor

    Info-Tech Research Group

    Bibliography

    Bean, Randy. “Why Becoming a Data-Driven Organization Is So Hard.” Harvard Business Review, 24 Feb. 2022. Accessed Oct. 2022.
    Brown, Annie. “Utilizing AI And Big Data To Reduce Costs And Increase Profits In Departments Across An Organization.” Forbes, 13 April 2021.
    Accessed Oct. 2022.
    Burciaga, Aaron. “Five Core Virtues For Data Science And Artificial Intelligence.” Forbes, 27 Feb. 2020. Accessed Aug. 2022.
    Cadwalladr, Carole, and Emma Graham-Harrison. “Revealed: 50 million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach.”
    The Guardian, 17 March 2018. Accessed Aug. 2022.
    Carlier, Mathilde. “Connected light-duty vehicles as a share of total vehicles in 2023.” Statista, 31 Mar. 2021. Accessed Oct. 2022.
    Carter, Rebekah. “The Ultimate List of Big Data Statistics for 2022.” Findstack, 22 May 2021. Accessed Oct. 2022.
    Castelvecchi, Davide. “Underdog technologies gain ground in quantum-computing race.” Nature, 6 Nov. 2023. Accessed Feb. 2023.
    Clark-Jones, Anthony, et al. “Digital Identity:” UBS, 2016. Accessed Aug 2022.
    “The Cost of Bad Data Infographic.” Pragmatic Works, 25 May 2017. Accessed Oct. 2022.
    Demchenko, Yuri, et al. “Data as Economic Goods: Definitions, Properties, Challenges, Enabling Technologies for Future Data Markets.“ ITU Journal: ICT Discoveries, Special Issue, no. 2, vol. 23, Nov. 2018. Accessed Aug 2022.
    Feldman, Sarah. ”20 Years of Quantum Computing Growth.” Statista, 6 May 2019. Accessed Oct. 2022.
    “Genomic Data Science.” NIH, National Human Genome Research Institute, 5 April 2022. Accessed Oct. 2022.

    Bibliography

    Hasbe, Sudhir, and Ryan Lippert. “The democratization of data and insights: making real-time analytics ubiquitous.” Google Cloud, 15 Jan. 2021.
    Accessed Aug. 2022.
    Helmenstine, Anne. “Viscosity Definition and Examples.” Science Notes, 3 Aug. 2021. Accessed Aug. 2022.
    “How data storytelling and augmented analytics are shaping the future of BI together.” Yellowfin, 19 Aug. 2021. Accessed Aug. 2022.
    “How Netflix Saves $1B Annually using AI?” Logidots, 24 Sept. 2021. Accessed Oct. 2022
    Hui, Kenneth. “The AWS Love/Hate Relationship with Data Gravity.” Cloud Architect Musings, 30 Jan. 2017. Accessed Aug 2022.
    ICD. “The Growth in Connected IoT Devices Is Expected to Generate 79.4ZB of Data in 2025, According to a New IDC Forecast.” Business Wire, 18 June 2019. Accessed Oct 2022.
    Internet of Things (IoT) and non-IoT active device connections worldwide from 2010 to 2025” Statista, 27 Nov. 2022. Accessed Nov. 2022.
    Koch, Gunter. “The critical role of data management for autonomous driving development.” DXC Technology, 2021. Accessed Aug. 2022.
    Morris, John. “The Pull of Data Gravity.” CIO, 23 Feb. 2022. Accessed Aug. 2022.
    Nield, David. “Google's Quantum Computer Is 100 Million Times Faster Than Your Laptop.” ScienceAlert, 9 Dec. 2015. Accessed Oct. 2022.
    Redman, Thomas C. “Seizing Opportunity in Data Quality.” MIT Sloan Management Review, 27 Nov. 2017. Accessed Oct. 2022.
    Segovia Domingo, Ana I., and Álvaro Martín Enríquez. “Digital Identity: the current state of affairs.” BBVA Research, 2018. Accessed Aug. 2022.

    Bibliography

    “State of IoT 2022: Number of connected IoT devices growing 18% to 14.4 billion globally.” IOT Analytics, 18 May 2022. Accessed. 14 Nov. 2022.
    Strod, Eran. “Data Observability and Monitoring with DataOps.” DataKitchen, 10 May 2021. Accessed Aug. 2022.
    Sujay Vailshery, Lionel. “Edge computing market value worldwide 2019-2025.” Statista, 25 Feb. 2022. Accessed Oct 2022.
    Sujay Vailshery, Lionel. “IoT and non-IoT connections worldwide 2010-2025.” Statista, 6 Sept. 2022. Accessed Oct. 2022.
    Sumina, Vladimir. “26 Cloud Computing Statistics, Facts & Trends for 2022.” Cloudwards, 7 June 2022. Accessed Oct. 2022.
    Taulli, Tom. “What You Need To Know About Dark Data.” Forbes, 27 Oct. 2019. Accessed Oct. 2022.
    Taylor, Linnet. “What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally.“ Big Data & Society, July-Dec 2017. Accessed Aug 2022.
    “Twitter: Data Collection With API Research Paper.” IvyPanda, 28 April 2022. Accessed Aug. 2022.
    “Using governance automation to reduce data risk.” Nintex, 15 Nov. 2021. Accessed Oct. 2022
    “Volume of data/information created, captured, copied, and consumed worldwide from 2010 to 2020, with forecasts from 2021 to 2025.” Statista, 8 Sept. 2022. Accessed Oct 2022.
    Wang, R. “Monday's Musings: Beyond The Three V's of Big Data – Viscosity and Virality.” Forbes, 27 Feb. 2012. Accessed Aug 2022.
    “What is a data fabric?” IBM, n.d. Accessed Aug 2022.
    Yego, Kip. “Augmented data management: Data fabric versus data mesh.” IBM, 27 April 2022. Accessed Aug 2022.

    Develop a Web Experience Management Strategy

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}555|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Marketing Solutions
    • Parent Category Link: /marketing-solutions
    • Web Experience Management (WEM) solutions have emerged as applications that provide marketers and other customer experience professionals with a complete set of tools for web content management, delivery, campaign execution, and site analytics.
    • However, many organizations are unsure of how to leverage these new technologies to enhance their customer interaction strategy.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • WEM products are not a one-size-fits-all investment: unique evaluations and customization is required in order to deploy a solution that fits your organization.
    • WEM technology often complements core CRM and marketing management products – it does not supplant it, and must augment the rest of your customer experience management portfolio.
    • WEM provides benefits by giving web visitors a better experience – leveraging tools such as web analytics gives the customer a tailored experience. Marketing can then monitor their behavior and use this information to warm leads.

    Impact and Result

    • Deploy a WEM platform and execute initiatives that will strengthen the web-facing customer experience, improving customer satisfaction and unlocking new revenue opportunities.
    • Avoid making unnecessary new WEM investments.
    • Make informed decisions about the types of technologies and initiatives that are necessary to support WEM.

    Develop a Web Experience Management Strategy Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should develop a WEM strategy, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Harness the value of web experience management

    Make the case for a web experience management suite and structure the WEM strategy project.

    • Develop a Web Experience Management Strategy Phase 1: Harness the Value of Web Experience Management
    • Web Experience Management Strategy Summary Template
    • WEM Project Charter Template

    2. Create the vision for web experience management

    Identify the target state WEM strategy, assess current state, and identify gaps.

    • Develop a Web Experience Management Strategy Phase 2: Create the Vision for Web Experience Management

    3. Execute initiatives for WEM deployment

    Build the WEM technology stack and create a web strategy initiatives roadmap.

    • Develop a Web Experience Management Strategy Phase 3: Execute Initiatives for WEM Deployment
    • Web Process Automation Investment Appropriateness Assessment Tool
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Develop a Web Experience Management Strategy

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Launch the WEM Selection Project

    The Purpose

    Discuss the general project overview for the WEM selection.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Launch of your WEM selection project.

    Development of your organization’s WEM requirements. 

    Activities

    1.1 Facilitation of activities from the Launch the WEM Project and Collect Requirements phase, including project scoping and resource planning.

    1.2 Conduct overview of the WEM market landscape, trends, and vendors.

    1.3 Conduct process mapping for selected marketing processes.

    1.4 Interview business stakeholders.

    1.5 Prioritize WEM functional requirements.

    Outputs

    WEM Procurement Project Charter

    WEM Use-Case Fit Assessment

    2 Plan the Procurement and Implementation Process

    The Purpose

    Plan the procurement and the implementation of the WEM solution.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Selection of a WEM solution.

    A plan for implementing the selected WEM solution. 

    Activities

    2.1 Complete marketing process mapping with business stakeholders.

    2.2 Interview IT staff and project team, identify technical requirements for the WEM suite, and document high-level solution requirements.

    2.3 Perform a use-case scenario assessment, review use-case scenario results, identify use-case alignment, and review the WEM Vendor Landscape vendor profiles and performance.

    2.4 Create a custom vendor shortlist and investigate additional vendors for exploration in the marketplace.

    2.5 Meet with project manager to discuss results and action items.

    Outputs

    Vendor Shortlist

    WEM RFP

    Vendor Evaluations

    Selection of a WEM Solution

    WEM projected work break-down

    Implementation plan

    Framework for WEM deployment and CRM/Marketing Management Suite Integration

    Integrate Physical Security and Information Security

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}383|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Security Processes & Operations
    • Parent Category Link: /security-processes-and-operations

    Physical security is often managed by facilities, not by IT security, resulting in segmented security systems. Integrating physical and information security introduces challenges in:

    • Understanding the value proposition of investment in governing and managing integrated systems, including migration costs, compared to separated security systems.
    • Addressing complex risks and vulnerabilities of an integrated security system.
    • Operationalizing enhanced capabilities created by adoption of emerging and disruptive technologies.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Integrate security in people, process, and technology to improve your overall security posture. Having siloed systems running security is not beneficial. Many organizations are realizing the benefits of consolidating into a single platform across physical security, cybersecurity, HR, legal, and compliance.
    • Plan and engage stakeholders. Assemble the right team to ensure the success of your integrated security ecosystem, decide the governance model, and clearly define the roles and responsibilities.
    • Enhance strategy and risk management. Strategically, we want a physical security system that is interoperable with most technologies, flexible with minimal customization, functional, and integrated, despite the challenges of proprietary configurations, complex customization, and silos.

    Impact and Result

    Info-Tech's approach is a modular, incremental, and repeatable process to integrate physical and information security to:

    • Ensure the integration will meet the business' needs and determine effort and technical requirements.
    • Establish GRC processes that include integrated risk management and compliance.
    • Design and deploy an integrated security architecture.
    • Establish security metrics of effectiveness and efficiency for senior management and leadership.

    Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Storyboard – A step-by-step document that walks you through how to integrate physical security and information security.

    Info-Tech provides a three-phased framework for integrating physical security and information security: Plan, Enhance, and Monitor & Optimize.

    • Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Storyboard

    2. Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool – A tool to map organizational goals to IT goals, facilities goals, OT goals (if applicable), and integrated security goals.

    This tool serves as a repository for information about security integration elements, compliance, and other factors that will influence your integration of physical security and information security.

    • Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool

    3. Integrate Physical Security and Information Security RACI Chart Tool – A tool to identify and understand the owners of various security integration stakeholders across the organization.

    Populating a RACI chart (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed) is a critical step that will assist you in organizing roles for carrying out integration steps. Complete this tool to assign tasks to suitable roles.

    • Integrate Physical Security and Information Security RACI Chart Tool

    4. Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Communication Deck – A tool to present your findings in a prepopulated document that summarizes the work you have completed.

    Complete this template to effectively communicate your integrated security plan to stakeholders.

    • Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Communication Deck
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Integrate Physical Security and Information Security

    Securing information security, physical security, or personnel security in silos may not secure much

    Analyst Perspective

    Ensure integrated security success with close and continual collaboration

    From physical access control systems (PACS) such as electronic locks and fingerprint biometrics to video surveillance systems (VSS) such as IP cameras to perimeter intrusion detection and prevention to fire and life safety and beyond: physical security systems pose unique challenges to overall security. Additionally, digital transformation of physical security to the cloud and the convergence of operational technology (OT), internet of things (IoT), and industrial IoT (IIoT) increase both the volume and frequency of security threats.

    These threats can be safety, such as the health impact when a gunfire attack downed wastewater pumps at Duke Energy Substation, North Carolina, US, in 2022. The threats can also be economic, such as theft of copper wire, or they can be reliability, such as when a sniper attack on Pacific Gas & Electric’s Metcalf Substation in California, US, damaged 17 out of 21 power transformers in 2013.

    Considering the security risks organizations face, many are unifying physical, cyber, and information security systems to gain the long-term overall benefits a consolidated security strategy provides.

    Ida Siahaan
    Ida Siahaan

    Research Director, Security and Privacy Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    Physical security is often managed by facilities, not by IT security, resulting in segmented security systems. Meanwhile, integrating physical and information security introduces challenges in:

    • Value proposition of investment in governing and managing integrated systems including the migration costs compared to separated security systems.
    • Addressing complex risks and vulnerabilities of an integrated security system.
    • Operationalizing on enhanced capabilities created by adoption of emerging and disruptive technologies.

    Common Obstacles

    Physical security systems integration is complex due to various components such as proprietary devices and protocols and hybrid systems of analog and digital technology. Thus, open architecture with comprehensive planning and design is important.

    However, territorial protection by existing IT and physical security managers may limit security visibility and hinder security integration.

    Additionally, integration poses challenges in staffing, training and awareness programs, and dependency on third-party technologies and their migration plans.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    Info-Tech’s approach is a modular, incremental, and repeatable process to integrate physical and information security that enables organizations to:

    • Determine effort and technical requirements to ensure the integration will meet the business needs.
    • Establish GRC processes including integrated risk management and compliance.
    • Design and deploy integrated security architecture.
    • Establish metrics to monitor the effectiveness and efficiency of the security program.

    Info-Tech Insight

    An integrated security architecture, including people, process, and technology, will improve your overall security posture. These benefits are leading many organizations to consolidate their siloed systems into a single platform across physical security, cybersecurity, HR, legal, and compliance.

    Existing information security models are not comprehensive

    Current security models do not cover all areas of security, especially if physical systems and personnel are involved and safety is also an important property required.

    • The CIA triad (confidentiality, integrity, availability) is a well-known information security model that focuses on technical policies related to technology for protecting information assets.
    • The US Government’s Five Pillars of Information Assurance includes CIA, authentication, and non-repudiation, but it does not cover people and processes comprehensively.
    • The AAA model, created by the American Accounting Association, has properties of authentication, authorization, and accounting but focuses only on access control.
    • Donn Parker expanded the CIA model with three more properties: possession, authenticity, and utility. This model, which includes people and processes, is known as the Parkerian hexad. However, it does not cover physical and personnel security.

    CIA Triad

    The CIA Triad for Information Security: Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability


    Parkerian Hexad

    The Parkerian Hexad for Security: Confidentiality, Possession, Utility, Availability, Authenticity and Integrity

    Sources: Parker, 1998; Pender-Bey, 2012; Cherdantseva and Hilton, 2015

    Adopt an integrated security model

    Adopt an integrated security model which consists of information security, physical security, personnel security, and organizational security.

    The security ecosystem is shifting from segregation to integration

    Security ecosystem is shifting from the past proprietary model to open interfaces and future open architecture

    Sources: Cisco, n.d.; Preparing for Technology Convergence in Manufacturing, Info-Tech Research Group, 2018

    Physical security includes:

    • Securing physical access,
      e.g. facility access control, alarms, surveillance cameras
    • Securing physical operations
      (operational technology – OT), e.g. programmable logic controllers (PLCs), SCADA

    Info-Tech Insight

    Why is integrating physical and information security gaining more and more traction? Because the supporting technologies are becoming more matured. This includes, for example, migration of physical security devices to IP-based network and open architecture.

    Reactive responses to physical security incidents

    April 1995

    Target: Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building, Oklahoma, US. Method: Bombing. Impact: Destroyed structure of 17 federal agencies, 168 casualties, over 800 injuries. Result: Creation of Interagency Security Committee (ISC) in Executive Order 12977 and “Vulnerability Assessment of Federal Facilities” standard.
    (Source: Office of Research Services, 2017)

    April 2013

    Target: Pacific Gas & Electric’s Metcalf Substation, California, US. Method: Sniper attack. Impact: Out of 21 power transformers, 17 were damaged. Result: Creation of Senate Bill No. 699 and NERC- CIP-014 standard.
    (Source: T&D World, 2023)

    Sep. 2022

    Target: Nord Stream gas pipelines connecting Russia to Germany, Baltic sea. Method: Detonations. Impact: Methane leaks (~300,000 tons) at four exclusive economic zones (two in Denmark and two in Sweden). Result: Sweden’s Security Service investigation.
    (Source: CNBC News, 2022)

    Dec. 2022

    Target: Duke Energy Substation, North Carolina, US. Method: Gunfire. Impact: Power outages of ~40,000 customers and wastewater pumps in sewer lift stations down. Result: State of emergency was declared.
    (Source: CBS News, 2022)

    Info-Tech Insight

    When it comes to physical security, we have been mostly reactive. Typically the pattern starts with physical attacks. Next, the impacted organization mitigates the incidents. Finally, new government regulatory measures or private sector or professional association standards are put in place. We must strive to change our pattern to become more proactive.

    Physical security market forecast and top physical security challenges

    Physical security market forecast
    (in billions USD)

    A forecast by MarketsandMarkets projected growth in the physical security market, using historical data from 2015 until 2019, with a CAGR of 6.4% globally and 5.2% in North America.

    A forecast by MarketsandMarkets projected growth in the physical security market, using historical data from 2015 until 2019, with a CAGR of 6.4% globally and 5.2% in North America.

    Source: MarketsandMarkets, 2022

    Top physical security challenges

    An Ontic survey (N=359) found that threat data management (40%) was the top physical security challenge in 2022, up from 33% in 2021, followed by physical security threats to the C-suite and company leadership (35%), which was a slight increase from 2021. An interesting decrease is data protection and privacy (32%), which dropped from 36% in 2021.

    An Ontic survey (N=359) found that threat data management (40%) was the top physical security challenge in 2022, up from 33% in 2021, followed by physical security threats to the C-suite and company leadership (35%), which was a slight increase from 2021. An interesting decrease is data protection and privacy (32%), which dropped from 36% in 2021.

    Source: Ontic Center for Protective Intelligence, 2022

    Info-Tech Insight

    The physical security market is growing in systems and services, especially the integration of threat data management with cybersecurity.

    Top physical security initiatives and operations integration investments

    We know the physical security challenges and how the physical security market is growing, but what initiatives are driving this growth? These are the top physical security initiatives and top investments for physical security operations integration:

    Top physical security initiatives

    The number one physical security initiative is integrating physical security systems. Other initiatives with similar concerns included data and cross-functional integration

    A survey by Brivo asked 700 security professionals about their top physical security initiatives. The number one initiative is integrating physical security systems. Other initiatives with similar concerns included data and cross-functional integration.

    Source: Brivo, 2022

    Top investments for physical security operations integration

    The number one investment is on access control systems with software to identify physical threat actors. Another area with similar concern is integration of digital physical security with cybersecurity.

    An Ontic survey (N=359) on areas of investment for physical security operations integration shows the number one investment is on access control systems with software to identify physical threat actors. Another area with similar concern is integration of digital physical security with cybersecurity.

    Source: Ontic Center for Protective Intelligence, 2022

    Evaluate security integration opportunities with these guiding principles

    Opportunity focus

    • Identify the security integration problems to solve with visible improvement possibilities
    • Don’t choose technology for technology’s sake
    • Keep an eye to the future
    • Use strategic foresight

    Piece by piece

    • Avoid taking a big bang approach
    • Test technologies in multiple conditions
    • Run inexpensive pilots
    • Increase flexibility
    • Build a technology ecosystem

    Buy-in

    • Collaborate with stakeholders
    • Gain and sustain support
    • Maintain transparency
    • Increase uptake of open architecture

    Key Recommendations:

    Focus on your master plan

    Build a technology ecosystem

    Engage stakeholders

    Info-Tech Insight

    When looking for a quick win, consider learning the best internal or external practice. For example, in 1994 IBM reorganized its security operation by bringing security professionals and non-security professionals in one single structure, which reduced costs by approximately 30% in two years.

    Sources: Create and Implement an IoT Strategy, Info-Tech Research Group, 2022; Baker and Benny, 2013; Erich Krueger, Omaha Public Power District (contributor); Doery Abdou, March Networks Corporate (contributor)

    Case Study

    4Wall Entertainment – Asset Owner

    Industry: Architecture & Engineering
    Source: Interview

    4Wall Entertainment is quite mature in integrating its physical and information security; physical security has always been under IT as a core competency.

    4Wall Entertainment is a provider of entertainment lighting and equipment to event venues, production companies, lighting designers, and others, with a presence in 18 US and UK locations.

    After many acquisitions, 4Wall Entertainment needed to standardize its various acquired systems, including physical security systems such as access control. In its integrated security approach, IT owns the integrated security, but they interface with related entities such as HR, finance, and facilities management in every location. This allows them to obtain information such as holidays, office hours, and what doors need to be accessed as inputs to the security system and to get sponsorship in budgeting.

    In the past, 4Wall Entertainment tried delegating specific physical security to other divisions, such as facilities management and HR. This approach was unsuccessful, so IT took back the responsibility and accountability.

    Currently, 4Wall Entertainment works with local vendors, and its biggest challenge is finding third-party vendors that can provide nationwide support.

    In the future, 4Wall Entertainment envisions physical security modernization such as camera systems that allow more network accessibility, with one central system to manage and IoT device integration with SIEM and MDR.

    Results

    Lessons learned in integrating security from 4Wall Entertainment include:

    • Start with forming relationships with related divisions such as HR, finance, and facilities management to build trust and encourage sponsorship across management.
    • Create policies, procedures, and standards to deploy in various systems, especially when acquiring companies with low maturity in security.
    • Select third-party providers that offer the required functionalities, good customer support, and standard systems interoperability.
    • Close skill gaps by developing training and awareness programs for users, especially for newly acquired systems and legacy systems, or by acquiring expertise from consulting services.
    • Complete cost-benefit analysis for solutions on legacy systems to determine whether to keep them and create interfacing with other systems, upgrade them, or replace them entirely with newer systems.
    • Delegate maintenance of specific highly regulated systems, such as fire alarms and water sprinklers, to facilities management.
    Integration of Physical and Information Security Framework. Inputs: Integrated Items, Stakeholders, and Security Components. Phases, Outcomes and Benefits: Plan, Enhance and Monitor & Optimize.

    Tracking progress of physical and information security integration

    Physical security is often part of facilities management. As a result, there are interdependencies with both internal departments (such as IT, information security, and facilities) and external parties (such as third-party vendors). IT leaders, security leaders, and operational leaders should keep the big picture in mind when designing and implementing integration of physical and information security. Use this checklist as a tool to track your security integration journey.

    Plan

    • Engage stakeholders and justify value for the business.
    • Define roles and responsibilities.
    • Establish/update governance for integrated security.
    • Identify integrated elements and compliance obligations.

    Enhance

    • Determine the level of security maturity and update security strategy for integrated security.
    • Assess and treat risks of integrated security.
    • Establish/update integrated physical and information security policies and procedures.
    • Update incident response, disaster recovery, and business continuity plan.

    Monitor & Optimize

    • Identify skill requirements and close skill gaps for integrating physical and information security.
    • Design and deploy integrated security architecture and controls.
    • Establish, monitor, and report integrated security metrics on effectiveness and efficiency.

    Benefits of the security integration framework

    Today’s matured technology makes security integration possible. However, the governance and management of single integrated security presents challenges. These can be overcome using a multi-phased framework that enables a modular, incremental, and repeatable integration process, starting with planning to justify the value of investment, then enhancing the integrated security based on risks and open architecture. This is followed by using metrics for monitoring and optimization.

    1. Modular

      • Implementing a consolidated security strategy is complex and involves the integration of process, software, data, hardware, and network and infrastructure.
      • A modular framework will help to drive value while putting in appropriate guardrails.
    2. Incremental

      • Integration of physical security and information security involves many components such as security strategy, risk management, and security policies.
      • An incremental framework will help track, manage, and maintain each step while providing appropriate structure.
    3. Repeatable

      • Integration of physical security and information security is a journey that can be approached with a pilot program to evaluate effectiveness.
      • A repeatable framework will help to ensure quick time to value and enable immediate implementation of controls to meet operational and security requirements.

    Potential risks of the security integration framework

    Just as medicine often comes with side effects, our Integration of Physical and Information Security Framework may introduce risks too. However, as John F. Kennedy, thirty-fifth president of the United States, once said, "There are risks and costs to a program of action — but they are far less than the long-range cost of comfortable inaction."

    Plan Phase

    • Lack of transparency in the integration process can lead to lack of trust among stakeholders.
    • Lack of support from leadership results in unclear governance or lack of budget or human resources.
    • Key stakeholders leave the organization during the engagement and their replacements do not understand the organization’s operation yet.

    Enhance Phase

    • The risk assessment conducted focuses too much on IT risk, which may not always be applicable to physical security systems nor OT systems.
    • The integrated security does not comply with policies and regulations.

    Monitor and Optimize Phase

    • Lack of knowledge, training, and awareness.
    • Different testing versus production environments.
    • Lack of collected or shared security metrics.

    Data

    • Data quality issues and inadequate data from physical security, information security, and other systems, e.g. OT, IoT.
    • Too much data from too many tools are complex and time consuming to process.

    Develop an integration of information security, physical security, and personnel security that meets your organization’s needs

    Integrate security in people, process, and technology to improve your overall security posture

    Having siloed systems running security is not beneficial. Many organizations are realizing the benefits of consolidating into a single platform across physical security, cybersecurity, HR, legal, and compliance.

    Plan and engage stakeholders

    Assemble the right team to ensure the success of your integrated security ecosystem, decide the governance model, and clearly define the roles and responsibilities.

    Enhance strategy and risk management

    Strategically, we want a physical security system that is interoperable with most technologies, flexible with minimal customization, functional, and integrated, despite the challenges of proprietary configurations, complex customization, and silos.

    Monitor and optimize

    Find the most optimized architecture that is strategic, realistic, and based on risk. Next, perform an evaluation of the security systems and program by understanding what, where, when, and how to measure and to report the relevant metrics.

    Focus on master plan

    Identify the security integration problems to solve with visible improvement possibilities, and don’t choose technology for technology’s sake. Design first, then conduct market research by comparing products or services from vendors or manufacturers.

    Build a technology ecosystem

    Avoid a big bang approach and test technologies in multiple conditions. Run inexpensive pilots and increase flexibility to build a technology ecosystem.

    Deliverables

    Each step of this framework is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool

    Map organizational goals to IT goals, facilities goals, OT goals (if applicable), and integrated security goals. Identify your security integration elements and compliance.

    Integrate Physical Security and Information Security RACI Chart Tool

    Identify various security integration stakeholders across the organization and assign tasks to suitable roles.

    Key deliverable:

    Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Communication Deck

    Present your findings in a prepopulated document that summarizes the work you have completed.

    Plan

    Planning is foundational to engage stakeholders. Start with justifying the value of investment, then define roles and responsibilities, update governance, and finally identify integrated elements and compliance obligations.

    Plan

    Engage stakeholders

    • To initiate communication between the physical and information security teams and other related divisions, it is important to identify the entities that would be affected by the security integration and involve them in the process to gain support from planning to delivery and maintenance.
    • Possible stakeholders:
      • Executive leadership, Facilities Management leader and team, IT leader, Security & Privacy leader, compliance officer, Legal, Risk Management, HR, Finance, OT leader (if applicable)
    • A successful security integration depends on aligning your security integration initiatives and migration plan to the organization’s objectives by engaging the right people to communicate and collaborate.

    Info-Tech Insight

    It is important to speak the same language. Physical security concerns safety and availability, while information security concerns confidentiality and integrity. Thus, the two systems have different goals and require alignment.

    Similarly, taxonomy of terminologies needs to be managed,1 e.g. facility management with an emergency management background may have a different understanding from a CISO with an information security background when discussing the same term. For example:

    In emergency management prevention means “actions taken to eliminate the impact of disasters in order to protect lives, property and the environment, and to avoid economic disruption.”2

    In information security prevention is “preventing the threats by understanding the threat environment and the attack surfaces, the risks, the assets, and by maintaining a secure system.”3

    Sources: 1 Owen Yardley, Omaha Public Power District (contributor); 2 Translation Bureau, Government of Canada, n.d.; 3 Security Intelligence, 2020


    Map organizational goals to integrated security goals

    Input

    • Corporate, IT, and Facilities strategies

    Output

    • Your goals for the integrated security strategy

    Materials

    • Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool

    Participants

    • Executive leadership
    • Facilities Management leader and team
    • IT leader
    • Security & Privacy leader
    • Compliance officer
    • Legal
    • Risk Management
    • HR & Finance
    • OT leader (if applicable)
    1. As a group, brainstorm organization goals.
      • Review relevant corporate, IT, and facilities strategies.
    2. Record the most important business goals in the “Goals Cascade” tab of the Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool. Try to limit the number of business goals to no more than ten goals. This limitation will be critical to helping focus on your integrated security goals.
    3. For each goal, identify one to two security alignment goals. These should be objectives for the security strategy that will support the identified organization goals.

    Download the Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool.

    Record organizational goals

    A table to identify Organization, IT, OT(if applicable), Facilities, and Security Goals Definitions.

    Refer to the Integration of Physical and Information Security Framework when filling in the table.

    1. Record your identified organizational goals in the “Goals Cascade” tab of the Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool.
    2. For each organizational goal, identify IT alignment goals.
    3. For each organizational goal, identify OT alignment goals (if applicable).
    4. For each organizational goal, identify Facilities alignment goals.
    5. For each organizational goal, select an integrated security goal from the drop-down menu.

    Justify value for the business

    Facilities in most cases have a team that is responsible for physical security installations such as access key controllers. Whenever there is an issue, they contact the provider to fix the error. However, with smart buildings and smart devices, the threat surface grows to include information security threats, and Facilities may not possess the knowledge and skills required to deal with them. At the same time, delegating physical security to IT may add more tasks to their already-too-long list of responsibilities. Consolidating security to a focused security team that covers both physical and information security can help.1 We need to develop the security integration business case beyond physical security "gates, guns, and guards" mentality.2

    An example of a cost-benefit analysis for security integration:

    Benefits

    Metrics

    Operational Efficiency and Cost Savings

    • Reduction in deployment, maintenance, and staff time in manual operations of physical security devices such as logs collection from analog cameras to be automated into digital.
    • Reduction in staffing costs by bringing physical security SOC and information security SOC in one single structure.

    Reliability Improvements

    • Reduction in field crew time by identifying hardware that can be virtualized to have a centralized remote control.
    • Improvement of operating reliability through continuous and real-time monitoring of equipment such as door access control systems and camera surveillance systems.

    Customers & Users Benefits

    • Improvement of customer safety for essential services such as access to critical locations only by authorized personnel.
    • Improvement of reliability of services and address human factor in adoption of change by introducing change as a friendly activity.

    Cost

    Metrics

    Equipment and Infrastructure

    • Upgrade of existing physical security equipment, e.g. replacement of separated access control, video management system (VMS), and physical access control system (PACS) with a unified security platform.
    • Implementation of communication network equipment and labor to install, configure, and maintain the new network component.

    Software and Commission

    • The software and maintenance fee as well as upgrade implementation project cost.
    • Labor cost of field commissioning and troubleshooting.
    • Integration with security systems, e.g. event and log management, continuous monitoring, and investigation.

    Support and Resources

    • Cost to hire/outsource security FTEs for ongoing management and operation of security devices, e.g. SOC, MSSP.
    • Cost to hire/outsource FTEs to analyze, design, and deploy the integrated security architecture, e.g. consulting fee.

    Sources: 1 Andrew Amaro, KLAVAN Security Services (contributor); 2 Baker and Benny, 2013;
    Industrial Control System Modernization, Info-Tech Research Group, 2023; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2021

    Plan

    Define roles and responsibilities

    Input

    • List of relevant stakeholders

    Output

    • Roles and responsibilities for the integration of physical and information security program

    Materials

    • Integrate Physical Security and Information Security RACI Chart Tool

    Participants

    • Executive leadership
    • Facilities Management leader and team
    • HR & Finance
    • IT leader and team
    • OT leader and team
    • Security & Privacy leader and team

    Many factors impact an organization’s level of effectiveness as it relates to integration of physical and information security. How the team interacts, what skill sets exist, the level of clarity around roles and responsibilities, and the degree of executive support and alignment are only a few. Thus, we need to identify stakeholders that are:

    • Responsible: The person(s) who does the work to accomplish the activity; they have been tasked with completing the activity and/or getting a decision made.
    • Accountable: The person(s) who is accountable for the completion of the activity. Ideally, this is a single person and is often an executive or program sponsor.
    • Consulted: The person(s) who provides information. This is usually several people, typically called subject matter experts (SMEs).
    • Informed: The person(s) who is updated on progress. These are resources that are affected by the outcome of the activities and need to be kept up to date.

    Download the Integrate Physical Security and Information Security RACI Chart Tool

    Define RACI chart

    Define Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed (RACI) stakeholders.

    1. Customize the Work Units to best reflect your operation with applicable stakeholders.
    2. Customize the Action rows as required.

    Integrate Physical Security and Information Security RACI Chart

    Sources: ISC, 2015; ISC, 2021

    Info-Tech Insight

    The roles and responsibilities should be clearly defined. For example, IT Security should be responsible for the installation and configuration of all physical access controllers and devices, and facility managers should be responsible for the physical maintenance including malfunctioning such as access device jammed or physically broken.

    Plan

    Establish/update governance for integrated security

    HR & Finance

    HR provides information such as new hires and office hours as input to the security system. Finance assists in budgeting.

    Security & Privacy

    The security and privacy team will need to evaluate solutions and enforce standards on various physical and information security systems and to protect data privacy.

    Business Leaders

    Business stakeholders will provide clarity for their strategy and provide input into how they envision security furthering those goals.

    IT Executives

    IT stakeholders will be a driving force, ensuring all necessary resources are available and funded.

    Facilities/ Operations

    Operational plans will include asset management, monitoring, and support to meet functional goals and manage throughout the asset lifecycle.

    Infrastructure & Enterprise Architects

    Each solution added to the environment will need to be chosen and architected to meet business goals and security functions.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Assemble the right team to ensure the success of your integrated security ecosystem and decide the governance model, e.g. security steering committee (SSC) or a centralized single structure.

    Adapted from Create and Implement an IoT Strategy, Info-Tech Research Group, 2022

    What does the SSC do?

    Ensuring proper governance over your security program is a complex task that requires ongoing care and feeding from executive management to succeed.

    Your SSC should aim to provide the following core governance functions for your security program:

    1. Define Clarity of Intent and Direction

      How does the organization’s security strategy support the attainment of the business, IT, facilities management, and physical and information security strategies? The SSC should clearly define and communicate strategic linkage and provide direction for aligning security initiatives with desired outcomes.
    2. Establish Clear Lines of Authority

      Security programs contain many important elements that need to be coordinated. There must be clear and unambiguous authority, accountability, and responsibility defined for each element so lines of reporting/escalation are clear and conflicting objectives can be mediated.
    3. Provide Unbiased Oversight

      The SSC should vet the organization’s systematic monitoring processes to ensure there is adherence to defined risk tolerance levels and that monitoring is appropriately independent from the personnel responsible for implementing and managing the security program.
    4. Optimize Security Value Delivery

      Optimized value delivery occurs when strategic objectives for security are achieved and the organization’s acceptable risk posture is attained at the lowest possible cost. This requires constant attention to ensure controls are commensurate with any changes in risk level or appetite.

    Adapted from Improve Security Governance With a Security Steering Committee , Info-Tech Research Group, 2018

    Plan

    Identify integrated elements and compliance obligations

    To determine what elements need to be integrated, it’s important to scope the security integration program and to identify the consequences of integration for compliance obligations.

    INTEGRATED ELEMENTS

    What are my concerns?

    Process integrations

    Determine which processes need to be integrated and how

    • Examples: Security prevention, detection, and response; risk assessment

    Software and data integration

    Determine which software and data need to be integrated and how

    • Examples: Threat management tools, SIEM, IDPS, security event logs

    Hardware integration

    Determine which hardware needs to be integrated and how

    • Examples: Sensors, alarms, cameras, keys, locks, combinations, and card readers

    Network and infrastructure

    Determine which network and infrastructure components need to be integrated and how

    • Example: Network segmentation for physical access controllers.

    COMPLIANCE

    How can I address my concerns?

    Regulations

    Adhere to mandatory laws, directives, industry standards, specific contractual obligations, etc.

    • Examples: NERC CIP (North American Utilities), Network and Information Security (NIS) Directive (EU), Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 (UK), Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1970 (US), Emergency Management Act, 2007 (Canada)

    Standards

    Adhere to voluntary standards and obligations

    • Examples: NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF), The Risk Management Process for Federal Facilities: An Interagency Security Committee Standard (US), Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC), Service Organization Control (SOC 1 and 2)

    Guidelines

    Adopt guidelines that can improve the integrated security program

    • Examples: Best Practices for Planning and Managing Physical Security Resources (US Interagency Security Committee), Information Security Manual - Guidelines for Physical Security (Australian Cyber Security Centre), 1402-2021-Guide for Physical Security of Electric Power Substations (IEEE)

    Record integrated elements

    Scope and Boundaries from the Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool.

    Refer to the “Scope” tab of the Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool when filling in the following elements.

    1. Record your integrated elements, i.e. process integration, software and data integration, hardware integration, network and infrastructure, and physical scope of your security integration, in the “Scope” tab of the Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool.
    2. For each of your scoping give the rationale for including them in the Comments column. Careful attention should be paid to any elements that are not in scope.

    Record your compliance obligations

    Refer to the “Compliance Obligations” tab of the Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool.

    1. Identify your compliance obligations. These can include both mandatory and voluntary obligations. Mandatory obligations include:
      • Laws
      • Government regulations
      • Industry standards
      • Contractual agreements
      Voluntary obligations include standards that the organization has chosen to follow for best practices and any obligations that are required to maintain certifications. Organizations will have many different compliance obligations. For the purposes of your integrated security, include those that include physical security requirements.
    2. Record your compliance obligations, along with any notes, in your copy of the Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool.
    3. Refer to the “Compliance DB” tab for lists of standards/regulations/ guidelines.
    The “Compliance Obligations” tab of the Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool.

    Remediate third-party compliance gaps

    If you have third-party compliance gaps, there are four primary ways to eliminate them:

    1. Find a New, Compliant Partner

      Terminate existing contract and find another organization to partner with.
    2. Bring the Capability In-House

      Expense permitting, this may be the best way to protect yourself.
    3. Demand Compliance

      Tell the third party they must become compliant. Make sure you set a deadline.
    4. Accept Noncompliance and Assume the Risk

      Sometimes remediation just isn’t cost effective and you have no choice.

    Follow Contracting Best Practices to Mitigate the Risk of Future Third-Party Compliance Gaps

    1. Perform Initial Due Diligence: Request proof of third-party compliance prior to entering into a contract.
    2. Perform Ongoing Due Diligence: Request proof of third-party contractor compliance annually.
    3. Contract Negotiation: Insert clauses requesting periodic assertions of compliance.

    View a sample contract provided by the US Department of Health and Human Services.

    Source: Take Control of Compliance Improvement to Conquer Every Audit, Info-Tech Research Group, 2015

    Pitfalls to avoid when planning security integration

    • No Resources Lineups

      Integration of security needs support from leadership, proper planning, and clear and consistent communication across the organization.
    • Not Addressing Holistic Security

      Create policies and procedures and follow standards that are holistic and based on threats and risks, e.g. consolidated access control policies.
    • Lack of Governance

      While the IT department is a critical partner in cybersecurity, the ownership of such a role sits squarely in the organizational C-suite, with regular reporting to the board of directors (if applicable).
    • Overlooking Business Continuity Effort

      IT and physical security are integral to business continuity and disaster recovery strategies.
    • Not Having Relevant Training and Awareness

      Provide a training and awareness program based on relevant attack vectors. Trained employees are key assets to the development of a safe and secure environment. They must form the base of your security culture.
    • Overbuilding or Underbuilding

      Select third-party providers that offer systems interoperability with other security tools. The intent is to promote a unified approach to security to avoid a cumbersome tooling zoo.

    Sources: Real Time Networks, 2022; Andrew Amaro, KLAVAN Security Services (contributor)

    Enhance

    Enhancing is the development of an integrated security strategy, policies, procedures, BCP, DR, and IR based on the organization’s risks.

    Enhance

    Determine the level of security maturity and update the security strategy

    • Before updating your security strategies, you need to understand the organization’s business strategies, IT strategies, facilities strategies, and physical and information security strategies. The goal is to align your integrated security strategies to contribute to your organization’s success.
    • The integrated security leaders need to understand the direction of the organization. For example:
      • Growth expectation
      • Expansions or mergers anticipation
      • Product or service changes
      • Regulatory requirements
    • Wise security investments depend on aligning your security initiatives to the organization’s objectives by supporting operational performance and ensuring brand protection and shareholder values.
    Integrated security strategies. Consists of an organization’s business strategies, IT strategies, facilities strategies, and physical and information security strategies.

    Sources: Amy L. Meger, Platte River Power Authority (contributor); Baker and Benny, 2013; IFSEC Global, 2023; Security Priorities 2023, Info-Tech Research Group, 2023; Build an Information Security Strategy, Info-Tech Research Group, 2020; ISC, n.d.

    Understanding security maturity

    Maturity models are very effective for determining security states. This table provides examples of general descriptions for physical and information security maturity levels.

    Determine which framework is suitable and select the description that most accurately reflects the ideal state for security in your organization.

    Level 1

    Level 2

    Level 3

    Level 4

    Level 5

    Minimum security with simple physical barriers. Low-level security to prevent and detect some unauthorized external activity. Medium security to prevent, detect, and assess most unauthorized external activity and some unauthorized internal activity. High-level security to prevent, detect, and assess most unauthorized external and internal activity. Maximum security to prevent, detect, assess, and neutralize all unauthorized external and internal activity.

    Physical security maturity level1

    Initial/Ad hoc security programs are reactive. Developing security programs can be effective at what they do but are not holistic. A defined security program is holistic, documented, and proactive. Managed security programs have robust governance and metrics processes. An optimized security program is based on strong risk management practices, including the production of key risk indicators (KRIs).

    Information security maturity level2

    Sources: 1 Fennelly, 2013; 2 Build an Information Security Strategy, Info-Tech Research Group, 2020

    Enhance

    Assess and treat integrated security risks

    The risk assessment conducted consists of analyzing existing inherent risks, existing pressure to the risks such as health and safety laws and codes of practice, new risks from the integration process, risk tolerance, and countermeasures.

    • Some organizations already integrate security into corporate security that consists of risk management, compliance, governance, information security, personnel security, and physical security. However, some organizations are still separating security components, especially physical security and information security, which limits security visibility and the organization’s ability to complete a comprehensive risks assessment.
    • Many vendors are also segregating physical security and information security solutions because their tools do well only on certain aspects. This forces organizations to combine multiple tools, creating a complex environment.
    • Additionally, risks related to people such as mental health issues must be addressed properly. The prevalence of hybrid work post-pandemic makes this aspect especially important.
    • Assess and treat risks based on the organization’s requirements, including its environments. For example, the US federal facility security organization is required to conduct risk assessments at least every five years for Level I (lowest risk) and Level II facilities and at least every three years for Level III, IV, and V (highest risk) facilities.

    Sources: EPA, n.d.; America's Water Infrastructure Act (AWIA), 2018; ISC, 2021

    “In 2022, 95% of US companies are consolidating into a single platform across physical security, cybersecurity, HR, legal and compliance.”

    Source: Ontic Center for Protective Intelligence, 2022; N=359

    Example risk levels

    The risk assessment conducted is based on a combination of physical and information security factors such as certain facilities factors. The risk level can be used to determine the baseline level of protection (LOP). Next, the baseline LOP is customized to the achievable LOP. The following is an example for federal facilities determined by Interagency Security Committee (ISC).

    Risk factor, points and score. Facility security level (FSL), level of risk, and baseline level of protection.

    Source: ISC, 2021

    Example assets

    It is important to identify the organization’s requirements, including its environments (IT, IoT, OT, facilities, etc.), and to measure and evaluate its risks and threats using an appropriate risk framework and tools with the critical step of identifying assets prior to acquiring solutions.

    Organizational requirements including its environments(IT, loT, OT, facilities, etc.)

    Info-Tech Insight

    Certain exceptions must be identified in risk assessment. Usually physical barriers such as gates and intrusion detection sensors are considered as countermeasures,1 however, under certain assessment, e.g. America's Water Infrastructure Act (AWIA),2 physical barriers are also considered assets and as such must also be assessed.

    Compromising a fingerprint scanner

    An anecdotal example of why physical security alone is not sufficient.

    Biometrics: secure access and data security.

    Image by Rawpixel.com on Freepik

    Lessons learned from using fingerprints for authentication:

    • Fingerprint scanners can be physically circumvented by making a copy an authorized user’s fingerprint with 3D printing or even by forcefully amputating an authorized user’s finger.
    • Authorized users may not be given access when the fingerprint cannot be recognized, e.g. if the finger is covered by bandage due to injury.
    • Integration with information security may help detect unauthorized access, e.g. a fingerprint being scanned in a Canadian office when the same user was scanned at a close time interval from an IP in Europe will trigger an alert of a possible incident.

    Info-Tech Insight

    In an ideal world, we want a physical security system that is interoperable with all technologies, flexible with minimal customization, functional, and integrated. In the real world, we may have physical systems with proprietary configurations that are not easily customized and siloed.

    Source: Robert Dang, Info-Tech Research Group

    Use case: Microchip implant

    Microchip implants can be used instead of physical devices such as key cards for digital identity and access management. Risks can be assessed using quantitative or qualitative approaches. In this use case a qualitative approach is applied to impact and likelihood, and a quantitative approach is applied to revenue and cost.

    Asset: Microchip implant

    Benefits

    Impact

    • Improve user satisfaction by removing the need to carry key cards, IDs, etc.
    • Improve operating reliability by reducing the likelihood of losing physical devices such as key cards.
    • Improve reliability of services through continuous and real-time connection with other systems such as payment system.

    Likelihood

    • Improve user satisfaction: High
    • Improve operating reliability: High
    • Improve reliability of services: High

    Revenue

    • Acquire new customers or retain existing customers by making daily lives easier with no need to carry key cards, IDs, etc.
    • Cost reduction in staffing of security personnel, e.g. reducing the staffing of building guards or receptionist.

    Risks

    Impact

    • Security: issues such as biohacking of wearable technology and interconnected devices.
    • Safety: issues such as infections or reactions in the body's immune system.
    • Privacy: issues such as unauthorized surveillance and tracking of activities.

    Likelihood

    • Biohacking: Medium
    • Infections: Low
    • Surveillance: High

    Cost

    • Installation costs and hardware costs.
    • Overall lifecycle cost including estimated software and maintenance costs.
    • Estimated cost of training and estimated increase in productivity.

    Sources: Business Insider, 2018; BBC News, 2022; ISC, 2015

    Enhance

    Update integrated security policies and procedures

    Global policies with local implementation

    This model works for corporate groups with a parent company. In this model, global security policies are developed by a parent company and local policies are applied to the unique business that is not supported by the parent company.

    Update of existing security policies

    This model works for organizations with sufficient resources. In this model, integrated security policies are derived from various policies. For example, physical security in smart buildings/devices (sensors, automated meters, HVAC, etc.) and OT systems (SCADA, PLCs, RTUs, etc.) introduce unique risk exposures, necessitating updates to security policies.

    Customization of information security policies

    This model works for smaller organizations with limited resources. In this model, integrated security policies are derived from information security policies. The issue is when these policies are not applicable to physical security systems or other environments, e.g. OT systems.

    Sources: Kris Krishan, Waymo (contributor); Isabelle Hertanto, Info-Tech Research Group (contributor); Physical and Environmental Security Policy Template, Info-Tech Research Group, 2022.

    Enhance

    Update BCP, DR, IR

    • Physical threats such as theft of material, vandalism, loitering, and the like are also part of business continuity threats.
    • These threats can be carried out by various means such as vehicles breaching perimeter security, bolt cutters used for cutting wire and cable, and ballistic attack.
    • Issues may occur when security operations are owned separately by physical security or information security, thus lacking consistent application of best practices.
    • To overcome this issue, organizations need to update BCP, DR, and IR holistically based on a cost-benefit analysis and the level of security maturity, which can be defined based on the suitable framework.

    Sources: IEEE, 2021; ISC, 2021

    “The best way to get management excited about a disaster plan is to burn down the building across the street.”

    Source: Dan Erwin, Security Officer, Dow Chemical Co., in Computerworld, 2022

    Optimize

    Optimizing means working to make the most effective and efficient use of resources, starting with identifying skill requirements and closing skill gaps, followed by designing and deploying integrated security architecture and controls, and finally monitoring and reporting integrated security metrics.

    Optimize

    Identify skill requirements and close skill gaps

    • The pandemic changed how people work and where they choose to work, and most people still want a hybrid work model. Our survey in July 2022 (N=516) found that 55.8% of employees have the option to work offsite 2-3 days per week, 21.0% can work offsite 1 day per week, and 17.8% can work offsite 4 days per week.
    • The investment (e.g. on infrastructure and networks) to initiate remote work was huge, and the costs didn’t end there; organizations needed to maintain the secure remote work infrastructure to facilitate the hybrid work model.
    • Moreover, roles are evolving due to convergence and modernization. These new roles require an integrative skill set. For example, the grid security and ops team might consist of an IT security specialist, a SCADA technician/engineer, and an OT/IIOT security specialist, where OT/IIOT security specialist is a new role.
    Identify skill gaps that hinder the successful execution of the hybrid work security strategy. Use the identified skill gaps to define the technical skill requirements for current and future work roles. Conduct a skills assessment on your current workforce to identify employee skill gaps. Decide whether to train (including certification), hire, contract, or outsource to close each skill gap.

    Strategic investment in internal security team

    Internal security governance and management using in-house developed tools or off-the-shelf solutions, e.g. security information and event management (SIEM).

    Security management using third parties

    Internal security management using third-party security services, e.g. managed security service providers (MSSPs).

    Outsourcing security management

    Outsourcing the entire security functions, e.g. using managed detection and response (MDR).

    Sources: Info-Tech Research Group’s Security Priorities 2023, Close the InfoSec Skills Gap, Build an IT Employee Engagement Program, and Grid Modernization

    Select the right certifications

    What are the options?

    • One issue in security certification is the complexity of relevancy in topics with respect to roles and levels.
    • The European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) takes the approach of analyzing existing certifications of ICS/SCADA professionals' cybersecurity skills by orientation, scope, and supporting bodies that are grouped into specific certifications, relevant certifications, and safety certifications (ENISA, 2015).
    • This approach can also be applied to integrated security certifications.

    Physical security certification

    • Examples: Industrial Security Professional Certification (NCMS-ISP); Physical Security Professional (ASIS-PSP); Physical Security Certification (CDSE-PSC); ISC I-100, I-200, I-300, and I-400

    Cyber physical system security certification

    • Examples: Certified SCADA Security Architect (CSSA), EC-Council ICS/SCADA Cybersecurity Training Course

    Information security certification

    • Examples: Network and Information Security (NIS) Driving License, ISA/IEC 62443 Cybersecurity Certificate Program, GIAC Global Industrial Cyber Security Professional (GICSP)

    Safety Certifications

    • Examples: Board of Certified Safety Professionals (BCSP), European Network of Safety and Health Professional Organizations (ENSHPO)
    Table showing options for Certification orientation, scope and supporting bodies.

    Optimize

    Design and deploy integrated security architecture and controls

    • A survey by Brivo found that 38% of respondents have partly centralized security platforms, 25% have decentralized platforms, and 36% have centralized platforms (Brivo, 2022; N=700).
    • If your organization’s security program is still decentralized or partly centralized and your organization is planning to establish an integrated security program, then the recommendation is to perform a holistic risk assessment based on probability and impact assessments on threats and vulnerabilities.
    • The impacted factors, for example, are customers served, criticality of services, equipment present inside the building, personnel response time for operational recovery and the mitigation of hazards, and costs.
    • Frameworks such as Sherwood Applied Business Security Architecture (SABSA), Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies (COBIT), and The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) can be used to build security architecture that aligns security goals with business goals.
    • Finally, analyze the security design against the design criteria.

    Sources: ISA and Honeywell Integrated Security Technology Lab, n.d.; IEEE, 2021

    “As long as organizations treat their physical and cyber domains as separate, there is little hope of securing either one.”

    Source: FedTech magazine, 2009

    Analyze architecture design

    Cloud, on-premises, or hybrid? During the pandemic, many enterprises were under tight deadlines to migrate to the cloud. Many did not refactor data and applications correctly for cloud platforms during migration, with the consequence of high cloud bills. This happened because the migrated applications cannot take advantage of on-premises capabilities such as autoscaling. Thus, in 2023, it is plausible that enterprises will bring applications and data back on-premises.

    Below is an example of a security design analysis of platform architecture. Design can be assessed using quantitative or qualitative approaches. In this example, a qualitative approach is applied using high-level advantages and disadvantages.

    Design criteria

    Cloud

    Hybrid

    On-premises

    Effort

    Consumer effort is within a range, e.g. < 60%

    Consumer effort is within a range e.g. < 80%

    100% organization

    Reliability

    High reliability

    High reliability

    Medium reliability that depends on data centers

    Cost

    High cost when data and applications are not correctly designed for cloud

    Optimized cost when data and applications are correctly designed either for cloud or native

    Medium cost when data and applications take advantage of on-prem capabilities

    Info-Tech Insight

    It is important for organizations to find the most optimized architecture to support them, for example, a hybrid architecture of cloud and on-premises based on operations and cost-effectiveness. To help design a security architecture that is strategic, realistic, and based on risk, see Info-Tech’s Identify the Components of Your Cloud Security Architecture research.

    Sources: InfoWorld, 2023; Identify the Components of Your Cloud Security Architecture , Info-Tech Research Group, 2021

    Analyze equipment design

    Below is an example case of a security design analysis of electronic security systems. Design can be assessed using quantitative or qualitative approaches. In this example a qualitative approach is applied using advantages and disadvantages.

    Surveillance design criteria

    Video camera

    Motion detector

    Theft of security system equipment

    Higher economic loss Lower economic loss

    Reliability

    Positive detection of intrusion Spurious indication and lower reliability

    Energy savings and bandwidth

    Only record when motion is detected Detect and process all movement

    Info-Tech Insight

    Once the design has been analyzed, the next step is to conduct market research to analyze the solutions landscape, e.g. to compare products or services from vendors or manufacturers.

    Sources: IEEE, 202; IEC, n.d.; IEC, 2013

    Analyze off-the-shelf solutions

    Criteria to consider when comparing solutions:

    Criteria to consider when comparing solutions: 1 - Visibility and asset management. 2 - Threat detection, mitigation and response. 3 - Risk assessment and vulnerability management. 4 - Usability, architecture, Cost.

    Visibility and Asset Management

    Passively monitoring data using various protocol layers, actively sending queries to devices, or parsing configuration files of physical security devices, OT, IoT, and IT environments on assets, processes, and connectivity paths.

    Threat Detection, Mitigation, and Response (+ Hunting)

    Automation of threat analysis (signature-based, specification-based, anomaly-based, flow-based, content-based, sandboxing) not only in IT but also in relevant environments, e.g. physical, IoT, IIoT, and OT on assets, data, network, and orchestration with threat intelligence sharing and analytics.

    Risk Assessment and Vulnerability Management

    Risk scoring approach (qualitative, quantitative) based on variables such as behavioral patterns and geolocation. Patching and vulnerability management.

    Usability, Architecture, Cost

    The user and administrative experience, multiple deployment options, extensive integration capabilities, and affordability.

    Source: Secure IT/OT Convergence, Info-Tech Research Group, 2022

    Optimize

    Establish, monitor, and report integrated security metrics

    Security metrics serve various functions in a security program.1 For example:

    • As audit requirements. For integrated security, the requirements are derived from mandatory or voluntary compliance, e.g. NERC CIP.
    • As an indicator of maturity level. For integrated security, maturity level is used to measure the state of security, e.g. C2M2, CMMC.
    • As a measurement of effectiveness and efficiency. Security metrics consist of operational metrics, financial metrics, etc.

    Safety

    Physical security interfaces with the physical world. Thus, metrics based on risks related to safety are crucial. These metrics motivate personnel by making clear why they should care about security.
    Source: EPRI, 2017

    Business Performance

    The impact of security on the business can be measured with various metrics such as operational metrics, service level agreements (SLAs), and financial metrics.
    Source: BMC, 2022

    Technology Performance

    Early detection leads to faster remediation and less damage. Metrics such as maximum tolerable downtime (MTD) and mean time to recovery (MTR) indicate system reliability.
    Source: Dark Reading, 2022

    Security Culture

    Measure the overall quality of security culture with indicators such as compliance and audit, vulnerability management, and training and awareness.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Security failure can be avoided by evaluating the security systems and program. Security evaluation requires understanding what, where, when, and how to measure and to report the relevant metrics.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Secure IT/OT Convergence

    The previously entirely separate OT ecosystem is migrating into the IT ecosystem, primarily to improve access via connectivity and to leverage other standard IT capabilities for economic benefit.

    Hence, IT and OT need to collaborate, starting with communication to build trust and to overcome their differences and followed by negotiation on components such as governance and management, security controls on OT environments, compliance with regulations and standards, and establishing metrics for OT security.

    Preparing for Technology Convergence in Manufacturing

    Information technology (IT) and operational technology (OT) teams have a long history of misalignment and poor communication.

    Stakeholder expectations and technology convergence create the need to leave the past behind and build a culture of collaboration.

    Build an Information Security Strategy

    Info-Tech has developed a highly effective approach to building an information security strategy – an approach that has been successfully tested and refined for over seven years with hundreds of organizations.

    This unique approach includes tools for ensuring alignment with business objectives, assessing organizational risk and stakeholder expectations, enabling a comprehensive current-state assessment, prioritizing initiatives, and building a security roadmap.

    Bibliography

    "1402-2021 - IEEE Guide for Physical Security of Electric Power Substations." IEEE, 2021. Accessed 25 Jan. 2023.

    "2022 State of Protective Intelligence Report." Ontic Center for Protective Intelligence, 2022. Accessed 16 Jan. 2023.

    "8 Staggering Statistics: Physical Security Technology Adoption." Brivo, 2022. Accessed 5 Jan. 2023.

    "America's Water Infrastructure Act of 2018." The United States' Congress, 2018. Accessed 19 Jan. 2023.

    Baker, Paul and Daniel Benny. The Complete Guide to Physical Security. Auerbach Publications. 2013

    Bennett, Steve. "Physical Security Statistics 2022 - Everything You Need to Know." WebinarCare, 4 Dec. 2022. Accessed 30 Dec. 2022.

    "Best Practices for Planning and Managing Physical Security Resources: An Interagency Security Committee Guide." Interagency Security Committee (ISC), Dec. 2015. Accessed 23 Jan. 2023.

    Black, Daniel. "Improve Security Governance With a Security Steering Committee." Info-Tech Research Group, 23 Nov. 2018. Accessed 30 Jan. 2023.

    Borg, Scott. "Don't Put Up Walls Between Your Security People." FedTech Magazine, 17 Feb. 2009. Accessed 15 Dec. 2022.

    Burwash, John. “Preparing for Technology Convergence in Manufacturing.” Info-Tech Research Group, 12 Dec. 2018. Accessed 7 Dec. 2022.

    Carney, John. "Why Integrate Physical and Logical Security?" Cisco. Accessed 19 Jan. 2023.

    "Certification of Cyber Security Skills of ICS/SCADA Professionals." European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), 2015. Accessed 27 Sep. 2022.

    Cherdantseva, Yulia and Jeremy Hilton. "Information Security and Information Assurance. The Discussion about the Meaning, Scope and Goals." Organizational, Legal, and Technological Dimensions of IS Administrator, Almeida F., Portela, I. (eds.), pp. 1204-1235. IGI Global Publishing, 2013.

    Cobb, Michael. "Physical security." TechTarget. Accessed 8 Dec. 2022.

    “Conduct a Drinking Water or Wastewater Utility Risk Assessment.” United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), n.d. Web.

    Conrad, Sandi. "Create and Implement an IoT Strategy." Info-Tech Research Group, 28 July 2022. Accessed 7 Dec. 2022.

    Cooksley, Mark. "The IEC 62443 Series of Standards: A Product Manufacturer's Perspective." YouTube, uploaded by Plainly Explained, 27 Apr. 2021. Accessed 26 Aug. 2022.

    "Cyber and physical security must validate their value in 2023." IFSEC Global, 12 Jan. 2023. Accessed 20 Jan. 2023.

    "Cybersecurity Evaluation Tool (CSET®)." Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). Accessed 23 Jan. 2023.

    "Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0." The United States' Department of Defense (DOD), 2021. Accessed 29 Dec. 2022.

    “Cyber Security Metrics for the Electric Sector: Volume 3.” Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), 2017.

    Czachor, Emily. "Mass power outage in North Carolina caused by gunfire, repairs could take days." CBS News, 5 Dec. 2022. Accessed 20 Jan. 2023.

    Dang, Robert, et al. “Secure IT/OT Convergence.” Info-Tech Research Group, 9 Dec. 2022. Web.

    "Emergency Management Act (S.C. 2007, c. 15)." The Government of Canada, 2007. Accessed 19 Jan. 2023.

    "Emergency management vocabulary." Translation Bureau, Government of Canada. Accessed 19 Jan. 2023.

    Fennelly, Lawrence. Effective physical security. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2013.

    Ghaznavi-Zadeh, Rassoul. "Enterprise Security Architecture - A Top-down Approach." The Information Systems Audit and Control Association (ISACA). Accessed 25 Jan. 2023.

    "Good Practices for Security of Internet of Things." European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), 2018. Accessed 27 Sep. 2022.

    "Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974." The United Kingdom Parliament. Accessed 23 Jan. 2023.

    Hébert, Michel, et al. “Security Priorities 2023.” Info-Tech Research Group, 1 Feb. 2023. Web.

    "History and Initial Formation of Physical Security and the Origin of Authority." Office of Research Services (ORS), National Institutes of Health (NIH). March 3, 2017. Accessed 19 Jan. 2023.

    "IEC 62676-1-1:2013 Video surveillance systems for use in security applications - Part 1-1: System requirements - General." International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), 2013. Accessed 9 Dec. 2022.

    "Incident Command System (ICS)." ICS Canada. Accessed 17 Jan. 2023.

    "Information Security Manual - Guidelines for Physical Security." The Australian Cyber Security Centre (ACSC), Dec. 2022. Accessed 13 Jan. 2023.

    "Integrated Physical Security Framework." Anixter. Accessed 8 Dec. 2022.

    "Integrating Risk and Security within a TOGAF® Enterprise Architecture." TOGAF 10, The Open Group. Accessed 11 Jan. 2023.

    Latham, Katherine. "The microchip implants that let you pay with your hand." BBC News, 11 Apr. 2022. Accessed 12 Jan. 2023.

    Linthicum, David. "2023 could be the year of public cloud repatriation." InfoWorld, 3 Jan. 2023. Accessed 10 Jan. 2023.

    Ma, Alexandra. "Thousands of people in Sweden are embedding microchips under their skin to replace ID cards." Business Insider, 14 May 2018. Accessed 12 Jan. 2023.

    Mendelssohn, Josh and Dana Tessler. "Take Control of Compliance Improvement to Conquer Every Audit." Info-Tech Research Group, 25 March 2015. Accessed 27 Jan. 2023.

    Meredith, Sam. "All you need to know about the Nord Stream gas leaks - and why Europe suspects 'gross sabotage'." CNBC, 11 Oct. 2022. Accessed 20 Jan. 2023.

    Nicaise, Vincent. "EU NIS2 Directive: what’s changing?" Stormshield, 20 Oct. 2022. Accessed 17 Nov. 2022.

    "NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems and Organizations." The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 13 Jul. 2022. Accessed 27 Jan. 2023.

    "North American Electric Reliability Corporation Critical Infrastructure Protection (NERC CIP) Series." NERC. Accessed 23 Jan. 2023.

    "North America Physical Security Market - Global Forecast to 2026." MarketsandMarkets, June 2021. Accessed 30 Dec. 2022.

    "NSTISSI No. 4011 National Training Standard For Information Systems Security (InfoSec) Professionals." The United States Committee on National Security Systems (CNSS), 20 Jun. 1994. Accessed 23 Jan. 2023.

    "Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSH) Act of 1970." The United States Department of Labor. Accessed 23 Jan. 2023.

    Palter, Jay. "10 Mistakes Made in Designing a Physical Security Program." Real Time Networks, 7 Sep. 2022. Accessed 6 Jan. 2023.

    Parker, Donn. Fighting Computer Crime. John Wiley & Sons, 1998.

    Pathak, Parag. "What Is Threat Management? Common Challenges and Best Practices." Security Intelligence, 2020. Accessed 5 Jan. 2023.

    Pender-Bey, Georgie. "The Parkerian Hexad." Lewis University, 2012. Accessed 24 Jan. 2023.

    Philippou, Oliver. "2023 Trends to Watch: Physical Security Technologies." Omdia. Accessed 20 Jan. 2023.

    Phinney, Tom. "IEC 62443: Industrial Network and System Security." ISA and Honeywell Integrated Security Technology Lab. Accessed 30 Jan. 2023.

    "Physical Security Market, with COVID-19 Impact Analysis - Global Forecast to 2026." MarketsandMarkets, Jan. 2022. Accessed 30 Dec. 2022.

    "Physical Security Professional (PSP)" ASIS International. Accessed 17 Jan. 2023.

    "Physical Security Systems (PSS) Assessment Guide" The United States' Department of Energy (DOE), Dec. 2016. Accessed 23 Jan. 2023.

    "Policies, Standards, Best Practices, Guidance, and White Papers." Interagency Security Committee (ISC). Accessed 23 Jan. 2023.

    "Profiles, Add-ons and Specifications." ONVIF. Accessed 9 Dec. 2022.

    "Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF)." The Australian Attorney-General's Department (AGD). Accessed 13 Jan. 2023.

    "Satellites detect methane plume in Nord Stream leak." The European Space Agency (ESA), 6 oct. 2022. Accessed 23 Jan. 2023.

    ""Satellites detect methane plume in Nord Stream leak." The European Space Agency (ESA), 6 oct. 2022. Accessed 23 Jan. 2023.

    Satgunananthan, Niru. "Challenges in Security Convergence?" LinkedIn, 8 Jan. 2022. Accessed 20 Dec. 2022.

    Sooknanan, Shastri and Isaac Kinsella. "Identify the Components of Your Cloud Security Architecture." Info-Tech Research Group, 12 March 2021. Accessed 26 Jan. 2023.

    "TC 79 Alarm and electronic security systems." International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), n.d. Accessed 9 Dec. 2022.

    "The Risk Management Process for Federal Facilities: An Interagency Security Committee Standard." Interagency Security Committee (ISC), 2021. Accessed 26 Jan. 2023.

    "The Short Guide to Why Security Programs Can Fail." CyberTalk, 23 Sep. 2021. Accessed 30 Dec. 2022.

    Verton, Dan. "Companies Aim to Build Security Awareness." Computerworld, 27 Nov. 2022. Accessed 26 Jan. 2023.

    "Vulnerability Assessment of Federal Facilities." The United States' Department of Justice, 28 Jun. 1995. Accessed 19 Jan. 2023.

    "What is IEC 61508?" 61508 Association. Accessed 23 Jan. 2023.

    Wolf, Gene. "Better Include Physical Security With Cybersecurity." T&D World 5 Jan. 2023. Accessed 19 Jan. 2023.

    Wood, Kate, and Isaac Kinsella. “Build an Information Security Strategy.” Info-Tech Research Group, 9 Sept. 2020. Web.

    Woolf, Tim, et al. "Benefit-Cost Analysis for Utility-Facing Grid Modernization Investments: Trends, Challenges, and Considerations." Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Feb. 2021. Accessed 15 Nov. 2022.

    "Work Health and Safety Act 2011." The Australian Government. Accessed 13 Jan. 2023.

    Wu, Jing. “Industrial Control System Modernization: Unlock the Value of Automation in Utilities.” Info-Tech Research Group, 6 April 2023. Web.

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Amy L. Meger, IGP

    Information and Cyber Governance Manager
    Platte River Power Authority

    Andrew Amaro

    Chief Security Officer (CSO) & Founder
    KLAVAN Security

    Bilson Perez

    IT Security Manager
    4Wall Entertainment

    Dan Adams

    VP of Information Technology
    4Wall Entertainment

    Doery Abdou

    Senior Manager
    March Networks Corporate

    Erich Krueger

    Manager of Security Engineering
    Omaha Public Power District

    Kris Krishan

    Head of IT
    Waymo

    Owen Yardley

    Director, Facilities Security Preparedness
    Omaha Public Power District

    Monitor IT Employee Experience

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}543|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $29,096 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 19 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Engage
    • Parent Category Link: /engage
    • In IT, high turnover and sub-optimized productivity can have huge impacts on IT’s ability to execute SLAs, complete projects on time, and maintain operations effectively.
    • With record low unemployment rates in IT, retaining top employees and keeping them motivated in their jobs has never been more critical.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • One bad experience can cost you your top employee. Engagement is the sum total of the day-to-day experiences your employees have with your company.
    • Engagement, not pay, drives results. Engagement is key to your team's productivity and ability to retain top talent. Approach it systematically to learn what really drives your team.
    • It’s time for leadership to step up. As the CIO, it’s up to you to take ownership of your team’s engagement.

    Impact and Result

    • Info-Tech tools and guidance will help you initiate an effective conversation with your team around engagement, and avoid common pitfalls in implementing engagement initiatives.
    • Monitoring employee experience continuously using the Employee Experience Monitor enables you to take a data-driven approach to evaluating the success of your engagement initiatives.

    Monitor IT Employee Experience Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should focus on employee experience to improve engagement in IT, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand how our tools will help you construct an effective employee engagement program.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Start monitoring employee experience

    Plan out your employee engagement program and launch the Employee Experience Monitor survey for your team.

    • Drive IT Performance by Monitoring Employee Experience – Phase 1: Start Monitoring Employee Experience
    • None
    • None
    • EXM Setup Guide
    • EXM Training Guide for Managers
    • None
    • EXM Communication Template

    2. Analyze results and ideate solutions

    Interpret your Employee Experience Monitor results, understand what they mean in the context of your team, and involve your staff in brainstorming engagement initiatives.

    • Drive IT Performance by Monitoring Employee Experience – Phase 2: Analyze Results and Ideate Solutions
    • EXM Focus Group Facilitation Guide
    • Focus Group Facilitation Guide Driver Definitions

    3. Select and implement engagement initiatives

    Select engagement initiatives for maximal impact, create an action plan, and establish open and ongoing communication about engagement with your team.

    • Drive IT Performance by Monitoring Employee Experience – Phase 3: Measure and Communicate Results
    • Engagement Progress One-Pager
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Monitor IT Employee Experience

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Launch the EXM

    The Purpose

    Set up the EXM and collect a few months of data to build on during the workshop.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Arm yourself with an index of employee experience and candid feedback from your team to use as a starting point for your engagement program.

    Activities

    1.1 Identify EXM use case.

    1.2 Identify engagement program goals and obstacles.

    1.3 Launch EXM.

    Outputs

    Defined engagement goals.

    EXM online dashboard with three months of results.

    2 Explore Engagement

    The Purpose

    To understand the current state of engagement and prepare to discuss the drivers behind it with your staff.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Empower your leadership team to take charge of their own team's engagement.

    Activities

    2.1 Review EXM results to understand employee experience.

    2.2 Finalize focus group agendas.

    2.3 Train managers.

    Outputs

    Customized focus group agendas.

    3 Hold Employee Focus Groups

    The Purpose

    Establish an open dialogue with your staff to understand what drives their engagement.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understand where in your team’s experience you can make the most impact as an IT leader.

    Activities

    3.1 Identify priority drivers.

    3.2 Identify engagement KPIs.

    3.3 Brainstorm engagement initiatives.

    3.4 Vote on initiatives within teams.

    Outputs

    Summary of focus groups results

    Identified engagement initiatives.

    4 Select and Plan Initiatives

    The Purpose

    Learn the characteristics of successful engagement initiatives and build execution plans for each.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Choose initiatives with the greatest impact on your team’s engagement, and ensure you have the necessary resources for success.

    Activities

    4.1 Select engagement initiatives with IT leadership.

    4.2 Discuss and decide on the top five engagement initiatives.

    4.3 Create initiative project plans.

    4.4 Build detailed project plans.

    4.5 Present project plans.

    Outputs

    Engagement project plans.

    Start Making Data-Driven People Decisions

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}427|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Leadership Development Programs
    • Parent Category Link: /leadership-development-programs
    • Ninety-one percent of IT leaders believe that analytics is important for talent management but 59% use no workforce analytics at all, although those who use analytics are much more effective than those who don't.
    • The higher the level of analytics used, the higher the level of effectiveness of the department as a whole.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • You don't need advanced metrics and analytics to see a return on people data. Begin by getting a strong foundation in place and showing the ROI on a pilot project.
    • Complex analyses will never make up for inadequate data quality. Spend the time up front to audit and improve data quality if necessary, no matter which stage of analytics proficiency you are at.
    • Ensure you collect and analyze only data that is essential to your decision making. More is not better, and excess data can detract from the overall impact of analytics.

    Impact and Result

    • Build a small-scale foundational pilot, which will allow you to demonstrate feasibility, refine your costs estimate, and show the ROI on people analytics for your budgeting meeting.
    • Drive organizational change incrementally by identifying and communicating with the stakeholders for your people analytics pilot.
    • Choose basic analytics suitable for organizations of all sizes and understand the building blocks of data quality to support more further analytics down the line.

    Start Making Data-Driven People Decisions Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should strategically apply people analytics to your IT talent management.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Define the problem and apply the checklist

    From choosing the right data for the right problem to evaluating your progress toward data-driven people decisions, follow these steps to build your foundation to people analytics.

    • Start Making Data-Driven People Decisions – Phase 1: Define the Problem and Apply the Checklist
    • People Analytics Strategy Template
    • Talent Metrics Library
    [infographic]

    Digital Data Ethics

    • Download01-Title: Tech Trend Update: If Digital Ethics Then Data Equity
    • Download-01: Visit Link
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9/10
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Innovation
    • Parent Category Link: /innovation

    In the past two years, we've seen that we need quick technology solutions for acute issues. We quickly moved to homeworking and then to a hybrid form. We promptly moved many of our offline habits online.

    That necessitated a boost in data collection from us towards our customers and employees, and business partners.
    Are you sure how to approach this structurally? What is the right thing to do?

    Impact and Results

    • When you partner with another company, set clear expectations
    • When you are building your custom solution, invite constructive criticism
    • When you present yourself as the authority, consider the most vulnerable in the relationship

    innovation

    Optimize IT Change Management

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}409|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.5/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $33,585 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 27 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Operations Management
    • Parent Category Link: /i-and-o-process-management
    • Infrastructure managers and change managers need to re-evaluate their change management processes due to slow change turnaround time, too many unauthorized changes, too many incidents and outages because of poorly managed changes, or difficulty evaluating and prioritizing changes.
    • IT system owners often resist change management because they see it as slow and bureaucratic.
    • Infrastructure changes are often seen as different from application changes, and two (or more) processes may exist.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • ITIL provides a usable framework for change management, but full process rigor is not appropriate for every change request.
    • You need to design a process that is flexible enough to meet the demand for change, and strict enough to protect the live environment from change-related incidents.
    • A mature change management process will minimize review and approval activity. Counterintuitively, with experience in implementing changes, risk levels decline to a point where most changes are “pre-approved.”

    Impact and Result

    • Create a unified change management process that reduces risk. The process should be balanced in its approach toward deploying changes while also maintaining throughput of innovation and enhancements.
    • Categorize changes based on an industry-standard risk model with objective measures of impact and likelihood.
    • Establish and empower a change manager and change advisory board with the authority to manage, approve, and prioritize changes.
    • Integrate a configuration management database with the change management process to identify dependencies.

    Optimize IT Change Management Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should optimize change management, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    • Optimize IT Change Management – Phases 1-4

    1. Define change management

    Assess the maturity of your existing change management practice and define the scope of change management for your organization.

    • Change Management Maturity Assessment Tool
    • Change Management Risk Assessment Tool

    2. Establish roles and workflows

    Build your change management team and standardized process workflows for each change type.

    • Change Manager
    • Change Management Process Library – Visio
    • Change Management Process Library – PDF
    • Change Management Standard Operating Procedure

    3. Define the RFC and post-implementation activities

    Bookend your change management practice by standardizing change intake, implementation, and post-implementation activities.

    • Request for Change Form Template
    • Change Management Pre-Implementation Checklist
    • Change Management Post-Implementation Checklist

    4. Measure, manage, and maintain

    Form an implementation plan for the project, including a metrics evaluation, change calendar inputs, communications plan, and roadmap.

    • Change Management Metrics Tool
    • Change Management Communications Plan
    • Change Management Roadmap Tool
    • Optimize IT Change Management Improvement Initiative: Project Summary Template

    [infographic]

    Workshop: Optimize IT Change Management

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Define Change Management

    The Purpose

    Discuss the existing challenges and maturity of your change management practice.

    Build definitions of change categories and the scope of change management.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understand the starting point and scope of change management.

    Understand the context of change request versus other requests such as service requests, projects, and operational tasks.

    Activities

    1.1 Outline strengths and challenges

    1.2 Conduct a maturity assessment

    1.3 Build a categorization scheme

    1.4 Build a risk assessment matrix

    Outputs

    Change Management Maturity Assessment Tool

    Change Management Risk Assessment Tool

    2 Establish Roles and Workflows

    The Purpose

    Define roles and responsibilities for the change management team.

    Develop a standardized change management practice for approved changes, including process workflows.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Built the team to support your new change management practice.

    Develop a formalized and right-sized change management practice for each change category. This will ensure all changes follow the correct process and core activities to confirm changes are completed successfully.

    Activities

    2.1 Define the change manager role

    2.2 Outline the membership and protocol for the Change Advisory Board (CAB)

    2.3 Build workflows for normal, emergency, and pre-approved changes

    Outputs

    Change Manager Job Description

    Change Management Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

    Change Management Process Library

    3 Define the RFC and Post-Implementation Activities

    The Purpose

    Create a new change intake process, including a new request for change (RFC) form.

    Develop post-implementation review activities to be completed for every IT change.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Bookend your change management practice by standardizing change intake, implementation, and post-implementation activities.

    Activities

    3.1 Define the RFC template

    3.2 Determine post-implementation activities

    3.3 Build your change calendar protocol

    Outputs

    Request for Change Form Template

    Change Management Post-Implementation Checklist

    Project Summary Template

    4 Measure, Manage, and Maintain

    The Purpose

    Develop a plan and project roadmap for reaching your target for your change management program maturity.

    Develop a communications plan to ensure the successful adoption of the new program.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A plan and project roadmap for reaching target change management program maturity.

    A communications plan ready for implementation.

    Activities

    4.1 Identify metrics and reports

    4.2 Build a communications plan

    4.3 Build your implementation roadmap

    Outputs

    Change Management Metrics Tool

    Change Management Communications Plan

    Change Management Roadmap Tool

    Further reading

    Optimize IT Change Management

    Right-size IT change management practice to protect the live environment.

    EXECUTIVE BRIEF

    Analyst Perspective

    Balance risk and efficiency to optimize IT change management.

    Change management (change enablement, change control) is a balance of efficiency and risk. That is, pushing changes out in a timely manner while minimizing the risk of deployment. On the one hand, organizations can attempt to avoid all risk and drown the process in rubber stamps, red tape, and bureaucracy. On the other hand, organizations can ignore process and push out changes as quickly as possible, which will likely lead to change related incidents and debilitating outages.

    Right-sizing the process does not mean adopting every recommendation from best-practice frameworks. It means balancing the efficiency of change request fulfillment with minimizing risk to your organization. Furthermore, creating a process that encourages adherence is key to avoid change implementers from skirting your process altogether.

    Benedict Chang, Research Analyst, Infrastructure and Operations, Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    Infrastructure and application change occurs constantly and is driven by changing business needs, requests for new functionality, operational releases and patches, and resolution of incidents or problems detected by the service desk.

    IT managers need to follow a standard change management process to ensure that rogue changes are never deployed while the organization remains responsive to demand.

    Common Obstacles

    IT system owners often resist change management because they see it as slow and bureaucratic.

    At the same time, an increasingly interlinked technical environment may cause issues to appear in unexpected places. Configuration management systems are often not kept up-to-date and do not catch the potential linkages.

    Infrastructure changes are often seen as “different” from application changes and two (or more) processes may exist.

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    Info-Tech’s approach will help you:

    • Create a unified change management practice that balances risk and throughput of innovation.
    • Categorize changes based on an industry-standard risk model with objective measures of impact and likelihood.
    • Establish and empower a Change Manager and Change Advisory Board (CAB) with the authority to manage, approve, and prioritize changes.

    Balance Risk and Efficiency to Optimize IT Change Management

    Two goals of change management are to protect the live environment and deploying changes in a timely manner. These two may seem to sometimes be at odds against each other, but assessing risk at multiple points of a change’s lifecycle can help you achieve both.

    Your challenge

    This research is designed to help organizations who need to:

    • Build a right-sized change management practice that encourages adherence and balances efficiency and risk.
    • Integrate the change management practice with project management, service desk processes, configuration management, and other areas of IT and the business.
    • Communicate the benefits and impact of change management to all the stakeholders affected by the process.

    Change management is heavily reliant on organizational culture

    Having a right-sized process is not enough. You need to build and communicate the process to gather adherence. The process is useless if stakeholders are not aware of it or do not follow it.

    Increase the Effectiveness of Change Management in Your Organization

    The image is a bar graph, with the segments labelled 1 and 2. The y-axis lists numbers 1-10. Segment 1 is at 6.2, and segment 2 is at 8.6.

    Of the eight infrastructure & operations processes measured in Info-Tech’s IT Management and Governance Diagnostic (MGD) program, change management has the second largest gap between importance and effectiveness of these processes.

    Source: Info-Tech 2020; n=5,108 IT professionals from 620 organizations

    Common obstacles

    These barriers make this challenge difficult to address for many organizations:

    • Gaining buy-in can be a challenge no matter how well the process is built.
    • The complexity of the IT environment and culture of tacit knowledge for configuration makes it difficult to assess cross-dependencies of changes.
    • Each silo or department may have their own change management workflows that they follow internally. This can make it difficult to create a unified process that works well for everyone.

    “Why should I fill out an RFC when it only takes five minutes to push through my change?”

    “We’ve been doing this for years. Why do we need more bureaucracy?”

    “We don’t need change management if we’re Agile.”

    “We don’t have the right tools to even start change management.”

    “Why do I have to attend a CAB meeting when I don’t care what other departments are doing?”

    Info-Tech’s approach

    Build change management by implementing assessments and stage gates around appropriate levels of the change lifecycle.

    The image is a circle, comprised of arrows, with each arrow pointing to the next, forming a cycle. Each arrow is labelled, as follows: Improve; Request; Assess; Plan; Approve; Implement

    The Info-Tech difference:

    1. Create a unified change management process that balances risk and throughput of innovation.
    2. Categorize changes based on an industry-standard risk model with objective measures of impact and likelihood.
    3. Establish and empower a Change Manager and Change Advisory Board (CAB) with the authority to manage, approve, and prioritize changes.

    IT change is constant and is driven by:

    Change Management:

    1. Operations - Operational releases, maintenance, vendor-driven updates, and security updates can all be key drivers of change. Example: ITSM version update
      • Major Release
      • Maintenance Release
      • Security Patch
    2. Business - Business-driven changes may include requests from other business departments that require IT’s support. Examples: New ERP or HRIS implementation
      • New Application
      • New Version
    3. Service desk → Incident & Problem - Some incident and problem tickets require a change to facilitate resolution of the incident. Examples: Outage necessitating update of an app (emergency change), a user request for new functionality to be added to an existing app
      • Workaround
      • Fix
    4. Configuration Management Database (CMDB) ↔ Asset Management - In addition to software and hardware asset dependencies, a configuration management database (CMDB) is used to keep a record of changes and is queried to assess change requests.
      • Hardware
      • Software

    Insight summary

    “The scope of change management is defined by each organization…the purpose of change management is to maximize the number of successful service and product changes by ensuring that the risk have been properly assessed, authorizing changes to process, and managing the change schedule.” – ALEXOS Limited, ITIL 4

    Build a unified change management process balancing risk and change throughput.

    Building a unified process that oversees all changes to the technical environment doesn’t have to be burdensome to be effective. However, the process is a necessary starting point to identifying cross dependencies and avoiding change collisions and change-related incidents.

    Use an objective framework for estimating risk

    Simply asking, “What is the risk?” will result in subjective responses that will likely minimize the perceived risk. The level of due diligence should align to the criticality of the systems or departments potentially impacted by the proposed changes.

    Integrate your change process with your IT service management system

    Change management in isolation will provide some stability, but maturing the process through service integrations will enable data-driven decisions, decrease bureaucracy, and enable faster and more stable throughput.

    Change management and DevOps can work together effectively

    Change and DevOps tend to be at odds, but the framework does not have to change. Lower risk changes in DevOps are prime candidates for the pre-approved category. Much of the responsibility traditionally assigned to the CAB can be diffused throughout the software development lifecycle.

    Change management and DevOps can coexist

    Shift the responsibility and rigor to earlier in the process.

    • If you are implementing change management in a DevOps environment, ensure you have a strong DevOps lifecycle. You may wish to refer to Info-Tech’s research Implementing DevOps Practices That Work.
    • Consider starting in this blueprint by visiting Appendix II to frame your approach to change management. Follow the blueprint while paying attention to the DevOps Callouts.

    DEVOPS CALLOUTS

    Look for these DevOps callouts throughout this storyboard to guide you along the implementation.

    The image is a horizontal figure eight, with 7 arrows, each pointing into the next. They are labelled are follows: Plan; Create; Verify; Package; Release; Configure; Monitor. At the centre of the circles are the words Dev and Ops.

    Successful change management will provide benefits to both the business and IT

    Respond to business requests faster while reducing the number of change-related disruptions.

    IT Benefits

    • Fewer change-related incidents and outages
    • Faster change turnaround time
    • Higher rate of change success
    • Less change rework
    • Fewer service desk calls related to poorly communicated changes

    Business Benefits

    • Fewer service disruptions
    • Faster response to requests for new and enhanced functionalities
    • Higher rate of benefits realization when changes are implemented
    • Lower cost per change
    • Fewer “surprise” changes disrupting productivity

    IT satisfaction with change management will drive business satisfaction with IT. Once the process is working efficiently, staff will be more motivated to adhere to the process, reducing the number of unauthorized changes. As fewer changes bypass proper evaluation and testing, service disruptions will decrease and business satisfaction will increase.

    Change management improves core benefits to the business: the four Cs

    Most organizations have at least some form of change control in place, but formalizing change management leads to the four Cs of business benefits:

    Control

    Change management brings daily control over the IT environment, allowing you to review every relatively new change, eliminate changes that would have likely failed, and review all changes to improve the IT environment.

    Collaboration

    Change management planning brings increased communication and collaboration across groups by coordinating changes with business activities. The CAB brings a more formalized and centralized communication method for IT.

    Consistency

    Request for change templates and a structured process result in implementation, test, and backout plans being more consistent. Implementing processes for pre-approved changes also ensures these frequent changes are executed consistently and efficiently.

    Confidence

    Change management processes will give your organization more confidence through more accurate planning, improved execution of changes, less failure, and more control over the IT environment. This also leads to greater protection against audits.

    You likely need to improve change management more than any other infrastructure & operations process

    The image shows a vertical bar graph. Each segment of the graph is labelled for an infrastructure/operations process. Each segment has two bars one for effectiveness, and another for importance. The first segment, Change Management, is highlighted, with its Effectiveness at a 6.2 and Importance at 8.6

    Source: Info-Tech 2020; n=5,108 IT Professionals from 620 organizations

    Of the eight infrastructure and operations processes measured in Info-Tech’s IT Management and Governance Diagnostic (MGD) program, change management consistently has the second largest gap between importance and effectiveness of these processes.

    Executives and directors recognize the importance of change management but feel theirs is currently ineffective

    Info-Tech’s IT Management and Governance Diagnostic (MGD) program assesses the importance and effectiveness of core IT processes. Since its inception, the MGD has consistently identified change management as an area for immediate improvement.

    The image is a vertical bar graph, with four segments, each having 2 bars, one for Effectiveness and the other for Importance. The four segments are (with Effectiveness and Importance ratings in brackets, respectively): Frontline (6.5/8.6); Manager (6.6/8.9); Director (6.4/8.8); and Executive (6.1/8.8)

    Source: Info-Tech 2020; n=5,108 IT Professionals from 620 organizations

    Importance Scores

    No importance: 1.0-6.9

    Limited importance: 7.0-7.9

    Significant importance: 8.0-8.9

    Critical importance: 9.0-10.0

    Effectiveness Scores

    Not in place: n/a

    Not effective: 0.0-4.9

    Somewhat Ineffective: 5.0-5.9

    Somewhat effective: 6.0-6.9

    Very effective: 7.0-10.0

    There are several common misconceptions about change management

    Which of these have you heard in your organization?

     Reality
    “It’s just a small change; this will only take five minutes to do.” Even a small change can cause a business outage. That small fix could impact a large system connected to the one being fixed.
    “Ad hoc is faster; too many processes slow things down.” Ad hoc might be faster in some cases, but it carries far greater risk. Following defined processes keeps systems stable and risk-averse.
    “Change management is all about speed.” Change management is about managing risk. It gives the illusion of speed by reducing downtime and unplanned work.
    “Change management will limit our capacity to change.” Change management allows for a better alignment of process (release management) with governance (change management).

    Overcome perceived challenges to implementing change management to reap measurable reward

    Before: Informal Change Management

    Change Approval:

    • Changes do not pass through a formal review process before implementation.
    • 10% of released changes are approved.
    • Implementation challenge: Staff will resist having to submit formal change requests and assessments, frustrated at the prospect of having to wait longer to have changes approved.

    Change Prioritization

    • Changes are not prioritized according to urgency, risk, and impact.
    • 60% of changes are urgent.
    • Implementation challenge: Influential stakeholders accustomed to having changes approved and deployed might resist having to submit changes to a standard cost-benefit analysis.

    Change Deployment

    • Changes often negatively impact user productivity.
    • 25% of changes are realized as planned.
    • Implementation challenge: Engaging the business so that formal change freeze periods and regular maintenance windows can be established.

    After: Right-Sized Change Management

    Change Approval

    • All changes pass through a formal review process. Once a change is repeatable and well-tested, it can be pre-approved to save time. Almost no unauthorized changes are deployed.
    • 95% of changes are approved.
    • KPI: Decrease in change-related incidents

    Change Prioritization

    • The CAB prioritizes changes so that the business is satisfied with the speed of change deployment.
    • 35% of changes are urgent.
    • KPI: Decrease in change turnaround time.

    Change deployment

    • Users are always aware of impending changes and changes don’t interrupt critical business activities.
    • Over 80% of changes are realized as planned
    • KPI: Decrease in the number of failed deployments.

    Info-Tech’s methodology for change management optimization focuses on building standardized processes

     1. Define Change Management2. Establish Roles and Workflows3. Define the RFC and Post-Implementation Activities4. Measure, Manage, and Maintain
    Phase Steps

    1.1 Assess Maturity

    1.2 Categorize Changes and Build Your Risk Assessment

    2.1 Determine Roles and Responsibilities

    2.2 Build Core Workflows

    3.1 Design the RFC

    3.2 Establish Post-Implementation Activities

    4.1 Identify Metrics and Build the Change Calendar

    4.2 Implement the Project

      Change Management Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Change Management Project Summary Template
    Phase Deliverables
    • Change Management Maturity Assessment Tool
    • Change Management Risk Assessment Tool
    • Change Manager Job Description
    • Change Management Process Library
    • Request for Change (RFC) Form Template
    • Change Management Pre-Implementation Checklist
    • Change Management Post-Implementation Checklist
    • Change Management Metrics Tool
    • Change Management
    • Communications Plan
    • Change Management Roadmap Tool

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    Change Management Process Library

    Document your normal, pre-approved, and emergency change lifecycles with the core process workflows .

    Change Management Risk Assessment Tool

    Test Drive your impact and likelihood assessment questionnaires with the Change Management Risk Assessment Tool.

    Project Summary Template

    Summarize your efforts in the Optimize IT Change Management Improvement Initiative: Project Summary Template.

    Change Management Roadmap Tool

    Record your action items and roadmap your steps to a mature change management process.

    Key Deliverable:

    Change Management SOP

    Document and formalize your process starting with the change management standard operating procedure (SOP).

    These case studies illustrate the value of various phases of this project

    Define Change Management

    Establish Roles and Workflows

    Define RFC and Post-Implementation Activities

    Measure, Manage, and Maintain

    A major technology company implemented change management to improve productivity by 40%. This case study illustrates the full scope of the project.

    A large technology firm experienced a critical outage due to poor change management practices. This case study illustrates the scope of change management definition and strategy.

    Ignorance of change management process led to a technology giant experiencing a critical cloud outage. This case study illustrates the scope of the process phase.

    A manufacturing company created a makeshift CMDB in the absence of a CMDB to implement change management. This case study illustrates the scope of change intake.

    A financial institution tracked and recorded metrics to aid in the success of their change management program. This case study illustrates the scope of the implementation phase.

    Working through this project with Info-Tech can save you time and money

    Engaging in a Guided Implementation doesn’t just offer valuable project advice, it also results in significant cost savings.

    Guided ImplementationMeasured Vale
    Phase 1: Define Change Management
    • We estimate Phase 1 activities will take 2 FTEs 10 days to complete on their own, but the time saved by using Info-Tech’s methodology will cut that time in half, thereby saving $3,100 (2 FTEs * 5 days * $80,000/year).

    Phase 2: Establish Roles and Workflows

    • We estimate Phase 2 will take 2 FTEs 10 days to complete on their own, but the time saved by using Info-Tech’s methodology will cut that time in half, thereby saving $3,100 (2 FTEs * 5 days * $80,000/year).
    Phase 3: Define the RFC and Post-Implementation Activities
    • We estimate Phase 3 will take 2 FTEs 10 days to complete on their own, but the time saved by using Info-Tech’s methodology will cut that time in half, thereby saving $3,100 (2 FTEs * 5 days * $80,000/year).

    Phase 4: Measure, Manage, and Maintain

    • We estimate Phase 4 will take 2 FTEs 5 days to complete on their own, but the time saved by using Info-Tech’s methodology will cut that time in half, thereby saving $1,500 (2 FTEs * 2.5 days * $80,000/year).
    Total Savings $10,800

    Case Study

    Industry: Technology

    Source: Daniel Grove, Intel

    Intel implemented a robust change management program and experienced a 40% improvement in change efficiency.

    Founded in 1968, the world’s largest microchip and semiconductor company employs over 100,000 people. Intel manufactures processors for major players in the PC market including Apple, Lenovo, HP, and Dell.

    ITIL Change Management Implementation

    With close to 4,000 changes occurring each week, managing Intel’s environment is a formidable task. Before implementing change management within the organization, over 35% of all unscheduled downtime was due to errors resulting from change and release management. Processes were ad hoc or scattered across the organization and no standards were in place.

    Results

    After a robust implementation of change management, Intel experienced a number of improvements including automated approvals, the implementation of a formal change calendar, and an automated RFC form. As a result, Intel improved change productivity by 40% within the first year of the program’s implementation.

    Define Change Management

    Establish Roles and Workflows

    Define RFC and Post-Implementation Activities

    Measure, Manage, and Maintain

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful."

    Guided Implementation

    "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track."

    Workshop

    "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place."

    Consulting

    "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks are used throughout all four options.

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is between 8 to 12 calls over the course of 4 to 6 months.

    Define Change Management

    • Call #1: Introduce change concepts.
    • Call #2: Assess current maturity.
    • Call #3: Identify target-state capabilities.

    Establish Roles and Workflows

    • Call #4: Review roles and responsibilities.
    • Call #5: Review core change processes.

    Define RFC and Post- Implementation Activities

    • Call #6: Define change intake process.
    • Call #7: Create pre-implementation and post-implementation checklists.

    Measure, Manage, and Maintain

    • Call #8: Review metrics.
    • Call #9: Create roadmap.

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

     Day 1Day 2Day 3Day 4Day 5
    Activities

    Define Change Management

    1.1 Outline Strengths and Challenges

    1.2 Conduct a Maturity Assessment

    1.3 Build a Change Categorization Scheme

    1.4 Build Your Risk Assessment

    Establish Roles and Workflows

    2.1 Define the Change Manager Role

    2.2 Outline CAB Protocol and membership

    2.3 Build Normal Change Process

    2.4 Build Emergency Change Process

    2.5 Build Pre-Approved Change Process

    Define the RFC and Post-Implementation Activities

    3.1 Create an RFC Template

    3.2 Determine Post-Implementation Activities

    3.3 Build a Change Calendar Protocol

    Measure, Manage, and Maintain

    4.1 Identify Metrics and Reports

    4.2 Create Communications Plan

    4.3 Build an Implementation Roadmap

    Next Steps and Wrap-Up (offsite)

    5.1 Complete in-progress deliverables from previous four days

    5.2 Set up review time for workshop deliverables and to discuss next steps

    Deliverables
    1. Maturity Assessment
    2. Risk Assessment
    1. Change Manager Job Description
    2. Change Management Process Library
    1. Request for Change (RFC) Form Template
    2. Pre-Implementation Checklist
    3. Post-Implementation Checklist
    1. Metrics Tool
    2. Communications Plan
    3. Project Roadmap
    1. Change Management Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)
    2. Workshop Summary Deck

    Phase 1

    Define Change Management

    Define Change Management

    1.1 Assess Maturity

    1.2 Categorize Changes and Build Your Risk Assessment

    Establish Roles and Workflows

    2.1 Determine Roles and Responsibilities

    2.2 Build Core Workflows

    Define the RFC and Post-Implementation Activities

    3.1 Design the RFC

    3.2 Establish Post-Implementation Activities

    Measure, Manage, and Maintain

    4.1 Identify Metrics and Build the Change Calendar

    4.2 Implement the Project

    This phase will guide you through the following steps:

    • Assess Maturity
    • Categorize Changes and Build Your Risk Assessment

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board

    Step 1.1

    Assess Maturity

    Activities

    1.1.1 Outline the Organization’s Strengths and Challenges

    1.1.2 Complete a Maturity Assessment

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board

    Outcomes of this step

    • An understanding of maturity change management processes and frameworks
    • Identification of existing change management challenges and potential causes
    • A framework for assessing change management maturity and an assessment of your existing change management processes

    Define Change Management

    Step 1.1: Assess Maturity → Step 1.2: Categorize Changes and Build Your Risk Assessment

    Change management is often confused with release management, but they are distinct processes

    Change

    • Change management looks at software changes as well as hardware, database, integration, and network changes, with the focus on stability of the entire IT ecosystem for business continuity.
    • Change management provides a holistic view of the IT environment, including dependencies, to ensure nothing is negatively affected by changes.
    • Change documentation is more focused on process, ensuring dependencies are mapped, rollout plans exist, and the business is not at risk.

    Release

    • Release and deployment are the detailed plans that bundle patches, upgrades, and new features into deployment packages, with the intent to change them flawlessly into a production environment.
    • Release management is one of many actions performed under change management’s governance.
    • Release documentation includes technical specifications such as change schedule, package details, change checklist, configuration details, test plan, and rollout and rollback plans.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Ensure the Release Manager is present as part of your CAB. They can explain any change content or dependencies, communicate business approval, and advise the service desk of any defects.

    Integrate change management with other IT processes

    As seen in the context diagram, change management interacts closely with many other IT processes including release management and configuration management (seen below). Ensure you delineate when these interactions occur (e.g. RFC updates and CMDB queries) and which process owns each task.

    The image is a chart mapping the interactions between Change Management and Configuration Management (CMDB).

    Avoid the challenges of poor change management

    1. Deployments
      • Too frequent: The need for frequent deployments results in reduced availability of critical business applications.
      • Failed deployments or rework is required: Deployments are not successful and have to be backed out of and then reworked to resolve issues with the installation.
      • High manual effort: A lack of automation results in high resource costs for deployments. Human error is likely, which adds to the risk of a failed deployment.
    2. Incidents
      • Too many unauthorized changes: If the process is perceived as cumbersome and ineffective, people will bypass it or abuse the emergency designation to get their changes deployed faster.
      • Changes cause incidents: When new releases are deployed, they create problems with related systems or applications.
    3. End Users
      • Low user satisfaction: Poor communication and training result in surprised and unhappy users and support staff.

    “With no controls in place, IT gets the blame for embarrassing outages. Too much control, and IT is seen as a roadblock to innovation.” – Anonymous, VP IT of a federal credit union

    1.1.1 Outline the Organization’s Strengths and Challenges

    Input

    • Current change documentation (workflows, SOP, change policy, etc.)
    • Organizational chart(s)

    Output

    • List of strengths and challenges for change management

    Materials

    Participants

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. As group, discuss and outline the change management challenges facing the organization. These may be challenges caused by poor change management processes or by a lack of process.
    2. Use the pain points found on the previous slide to help guide the discussion.
    3. As a group, also outline the strengths of change management and the strengths of the current organization. Use these strengths as a guide to know what practices to continue and what strengths you can leverage to improve the change management process.
    4. Record the activity results in the Project Summary Template.

    Download the Optimize IT Change Management Improvement Initiative: Project Summary Template

    Assess current change management maturity to create a plan for improvement

     ChaosReactiveControlled

    Proactive

    Optimized
    Change Requests No defined processes for submitting changes Low process adherence and no RFC form RFC form is centralized and a point of contact for changes exists RFCs are reviewed for scope and completion RFCs trend analysis and proactive change exists
    Change Review Little to no change risk assessment Risk assessment exists for each RFC RFC form is centralized and a point of contact for changes exists Change calendar exists and is maintained System and component dependencies exist (CMDB)
    Change Approval No formal approval process exists Approval process exists but is not widely followed Unauthorized changes are minimal or nonexistent Change advisory board (CAB) is established and formalized Trend analysis exists increasing pre-approved changes
    Post-Deployment No post-deployment change review exists Process exists but is not widely followed Reduction of change-related incidents Stakeholder satisfaction is gathered and reviewed Lessons learned are propagated and actioned
    Process Governance Roles & responsibilities are ad hoc Roles, policies & procedures are defined & documented Roles, policies & procedures are defined & documented KPIs are tracked, reported on, and reviewed KPIs are proactively managed for improvement

    Info-Tech Insight

    Reaching an optimized level is not feasible for every organization. You may be able to run a very good change management process at the Proactive or even Controlled stage. Pay special attention to keeping your goals attainable.

    1.1.2 Complete a Maturity Assessment

    Input

    • Current change documentation (workflows, SOP, change policy, etc.)

    Output

    • Assessment of current maturity level and goals to improve change management

    Materials

    Participants

    • Change Manager
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Operations (optional)
    1. Use Info-Tech’s Change Management Maturity Assessment Tool to assess the maturity and completeness of your change process.
    2. Significant gaps revealed in this assessment should be the focal points of your discussion when investigating root causes and brainstorming remediation activities:
      1. For each activity of each process area of change management, determine the degree of completeness of your current process.
      2. Review your maturity assessment results and discuss as a group potential reasons why you arrived at your maturity level. Identify areas where you should focus your initial attention for improvement.
      3. Regularly review the maturity of your change management practices by completing this maturity assessment tool periodically to identify other areas to optimize.

    Download the Change Management Maturity Assessment Tool

    Case Study

    Even Google isn’t immune to change-related outages. Plan ahead and communicate to help avoid change-related incidents

    Industry: Technology

    Source: The Register

    As part of a routine maintenance procedure, Google engineers moved App Engine applications between data centers in the Central US to balance out traffic.

    Unfortunately, at the same time that applications were being rerouted, a software update was in progress on the traffic routers, which triggered a restart. This temporarily diminished router capacity, knocking out a sizeable portion of Google Cloud.

    The server drain resulted in a huge spike in startup requests, and the routers simply couldn’t handle the traffic.

    As a result, 21% of Google App Engine applications hosted in the Central US experienced error rates in excess of 10%, while an additional 16% of applications experienced latency, albeit at a lower rate.

    Solution

    Thankfully, engineers were actively monitoring the implementation of the change and were able to spring into action to halt the problem.

    The change was rolled back after 11 minutes, but the configuration error still needed to be fixed. After about two hours, the change failure was resolved and the Google Cloud was fully functional.

    One takeaway for the engineering team was to closely monitor how changes are scheduled. Ultimately, this was the result of miscommunication and a lack of transparency between change teams.

    Step 1.2

    Categorize Changes and Build Your Risk Assessment

    Activities

    1.2.1 Define What Constitutes a Change

    1.2.2 Build a Change Categorization Scheme

    1.2.3 Build a Classification Scheme to Assess Impact

    1.2.4 Build a Classification Scheme to Define Likelihood

    1.2.5 Evaluate and Adjust Your Risk Assessment Scheme

    Define Change Management

    Step 1.1: Assess Maturity → Step 1.2: Categorize Changes and Build Your Risk Assessment

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Infrastructure/Applications Manager
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board

    Outcomes of this step

    • A clear definition of what constitutes a change in your organization
    • A defined categorization scheme to classify types of changes
    • A risk assessment matrix and tool for evaluating and prioritizing change requests according to impact and likelihood of risk

    Change must be managed to mitigate risk to the infrastructure

    Change management is the gatekeeper protecting your live environment.

    Successfully managed changes will optimize risk exposure, severity of impact, and disruption. This will result in the bottom-line business benefits of removal of risk, early realization of benefits, and savings of money and time.

    • IT change is constant; change requests will be made both proactively and reactively to upgrade systems, acquire new functionality, and to prevent or resolve incidents.
    • Every change to the infrastructure must pass through the change management process before being deployed to ensure that it has been properly assessed and tested, and to check that a backout /rollback plan is in place.
    • It will be less expensive to invest in a rigorous change management process than to resolve incidents, service disruptions, and outages caused by the deployment of a bad change.
    • Change management is what gives you control and visibility regarding what is introduced to the live environment, preventing incidents that threaten business continuity.

    80%

    In organizations without formal change management processes, about 80% (The Visible Ops Handbook) of IT service outage problems are caused by updates and changes to systems, applications, and infrastructure. It’s crucial to track and systematically manage change to fully understand and predict the risks and potential impact of the change.

    Attributes of a change

    Differentiate changes from other IT requests

    Is this in the production environment of a business process?

    The core business of the enterprise or supporting functions may be affected.

    Does the task affect an enterprise managed system?

    If it’s for a local application, it’s a service request

    How many users are impacted?

    It should usually impact more than a single user (in most cases).

    Is there a configuration, or code, or workflow, or UI/UX change?

    Any impact on a business process is a change; adding a user or a recipient to a report or mailing list is not a change.

    Does the underlying service currently exist?

    If it’s a new service, then it’s better described as a project.

    Is this done/requested by IT?

    It needs to be within the scope of IT for the change management process to apply.

    Will this take longer than one week?

    As a general rule, if it takes longer than 40 hours of work to complete, it’s likely a project.

    Defining what constitutes a change

    Every change request will initiate the change management process; don’t waste time reviewing requests that are out of scope.

    ChangeService Request (User)Operational Task (Backend)
    • Fixing defects in code
    • Changing configuration of an enterprise system
    • Adding new software or hardware components
    • Switching an application to another VM
    • Standardized request
    • New PC
    • Permissions request
    • Change password
    • Add user
    • Purchases
    • Change the backup tape
    • Delete temporary files
    • Maintain database (one that is well defined, repeatable, and predictable)
    • Run utilities to repair a database

    Do not treat every IT request as a change!

    • Many organizations make the mistake of calling a standard service request or operational task a “change.”
    • Every change request will initiate the change management process; don’t waste time reviewing requests that are out of scope.
    • While the overuse of RFCs for out-of-scope requests is better than a lack of process, this will slow the process and delay the approval of more critical changes.
    • Requiring an RFC for something that should be considered day-to-day work will also discourage people from adhering to the process, because the RFC will be seen as meaningless paperwork.

     

    1.2.1 Define What Constitutes a Change

    Input

    • List of examples of each category of the chart

    Output

    • Definitions for each category to be used at change intake

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts (or shared screen if working remotely)
    • Service catalog (if applicable)
    • Sticky notes
    • Markers/pens
    • Change Management SOP

    Participants

    • Infrastructure Manager
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. As a group, brainstorm examples of changes, projects, service requests (user), operational tasks (backend), and releases. You may add additional categories as needed (e.g. incidents).
    2. Have each participant write the examples on sticky notes and populate the following chart on the whiteboard/flip chart.
    3. Use the examples to draw lines and define what defines each category.
      • What makes a change distinct from a project?
      • What makes a change distinct from a service request?
      • What makes a change distinct from an operational task?
      • When do the category workflows cross over with other categories? (For example, when does a project interact with change management?)
    4. Record the definitions of requests and results in section 2.3 of the Change Management Standard Operating Procedure (SOP).
    ChangeProjectService Request (User)Operational Task (Backend)Release
    Changing Configuration ERP upgrade Add new user Delete temp files Software release

    Download the Change Management Standard Operating Procedure (SOP).

    Each RFC should define resources needed to effect the change

    In addition to assigning a category to each RFC based on risk assessment, each RFC should also be assigned a priority based on the impact of the change on the IT organization, in terms of the resources needed to effect the change.

    Categories include

    Normal

    Emergency

    Pre-Approved

    The majority of changes will be pre-approved or normal changes. Definitions of each category are provided on the next slide.

    Info-Tech uses the term pre-approved rather than the ITIL terminology of standard to more accurately define the type of change represented by this category.

    A potential fourth change category of expedited may be employed if you are having issues with process adherence or if you experience changes driven from outside change management’s control (e.g. from the CIO, director, judiciary, etc.) See Appendix I for more details.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Do not rush to designate changes as pre-approved. You may have a good idea of which changes may be considered pre-approved, but make sure they are in fact low-risk and well-documented before moving them over from the normal category.

    The category of the change determines the process it follows

     Pre-ApprovedNormalEmergency
    Definition
    • Tasks are well-known, documented, and proven
    • Budgetary approval is preordained or within control of change requester
    • Risk is low and understood
    • There’s a low probability of failure
    • All changes that are not pre-approved or emergency will be classified as normal
    • Further categorized by priority/risk
    • The change is being requested to resolve a current or imminent critical/severity-1 incident that threatens business continuity
    • Associated with a critical incident or problem ticket
    Trigger
    • The same change is built and changed repeatedly using the same install procedures and resulting in the same low-risk outcome
    • Upgrade or new functionality that will capture a business benefit
    • A fix to a current problem
    • A current or imminent critical incident that will impact business continuity
    • Urgency to implement the change must be established, as well as lack of any alternative or workaround
    Workflow
    • Pre-established
    • Repeatable with same sequence of actions, with minimal judgment or decision points
    • Dependent on the change
    • Different workflows depending on prioritization
    • Dependent on the change
    Approval
    • Change Manager (does not need to be reviewed by CAB)
    • CAB
    • Approval from the Emergency Change Advisory Board (E-CAB) is sufficient to proceed with the change
    • A retroactive RFC must be created and approved by the CAB

    Pay close attention to defining your pre-approved changes. They are going to be critical for running a smooth change management practice in a DevOps Environment

    1.2.2 Build a Change Categorization Scheme

    Input

    • List of examples of each change category

    Output

    • Definitions for each change category

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts (or shared screen if working remotely)
    • Service catalog (if applicable)
    • Sticky notes
    • Markers
    • Change Management SOP

    Participants

    • Infrastructure Manager
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. Discuss the change categories on the previous slide and modify the types of descriptions to suit your organization.
    2. Once the change categories or types are defined, identify several examples of change requests that would fall under each category.
    3. Types of normal changes will be further defined in the next activity and can be left blank for now.
    4. Examples are provided below. Capture your definitions in section 4 of your Change Management SOP.
    Pre-Approved (AKA Standard)NormalEmergency
    • Microsoft patch management/deployment
    • Windows update
    • Minor form changes
    • Service pack updates on non-critical systems
    • Advance label status on orders
    • Change log retention period/storage
    • Change backup frequency

    Major

    • Active directory server upgrade
    • New ERP

    Medium

    • Network upgrade
    • High availability implementation

    Minor

    • Ticket system go-live
    • UPS replacement
    • Cognos update
    • Any change other than a pre-approved change
    • Needed to resolve a major outage in a Tier 1 system

    Assess the risk for each normal change based on impact (severity) and likelihood (probability)

    Create a change assessment risk matrix to standardize risk assessment for new changes. Formalizing this assessment should be one of the first priorities of change management.

    The following slides guide you through the steps of formalizing a risk assessment according to impact and likelihood:

    1. Define a risk matrix: Risk matrices can either be a 3x3 matrix (Minor, Medium, or High Risk as shown on the next slide) or a 4x4 matrix (Minor, Medium, High, or Critical Risk).
    2. Build an impact assessment: Enable consistent measurement of impact for each change by incorporating a standardized questionnaire for each RFC.
    3. Build a likelihood assessment: Enable the consistent measurement of impact for each change by incorporating a standardized questionnaire for each RFC.
    4. Test drive your risk assessment and make necessary adjustments: Measure your newly formed risk assessment questionnaires against historical changes to test its accuracy.

    Consider risk

    1. Risk should be the primary consideration in classifying a normal change as Low, Medium, High. The extent of governance required, as well as minimum timeline to implement the change, will follow from the risk assessment.
    2. The business benefit often matches the impact level of the risk – a change that will provide a significant benefit to a large number of users may likely carry an equally major downside if deviations occur.

    Info-Tech Insight

    All changes entail an additional level of risk. Risk is a function of impact and likelihood. Risk may be reduced, accepted, or neutralized through following best practices around training, testing, backout planning, redundancy, timing and sequencing of changes, etc.

    Create a risk matrix to assign a risk rating to each RFC

    Every normal RFC should be assigned a risk rating.

    How is risk rating determined?

    • Priority should be based on the business consequences of implementing or denying the change.
    • Risk rating is assigned using the impact of the risk and likelihood/probability that the event may occur.

    Who determines priority?

    • Priority should be decided with the change requester and with the CAB, if necessary.
    • Don’t let the change requester decide priority alone, as they will usually assign it a higher priority than is justified. Use a repeatable, standardized framework to assess each request.

    How is risk rating used?

    • Risk rating is used to determine which changes should be discussed and assessed first.
    • Time frames and escalation processes should be defined for each risk level.

    RFCs need to clearly identify the risk level of the proposed change. This can be done through statement of impact and likelihood (low/medium/high) or through pertinent questions linked with business rules to assess the risk.

    Risk always has a negative impact, but the size of the impact can vary considerably in terms of cost, number of people or sites affected, and severity of the impact. Impact questions tend to be more objective and quantifiable than likelihood questions.

    Risk Matrix

    Risk Matrix. Impact vs. Likelihood. Low impact, Low Likelihood and Medium Impact, Medium Likelihood are minor risks. High Likelihood, Low Impact; Medium Likelihood, Medium Impact; and Low Likelihood, High Impact are Medium Risk. High Impact, High Likelihood; High Impact, Medium Likelihood; and Medium Impact, High Likelihood are Major risk.

    1.2.3 Build a Classification Scheme to Assess Impact

    Input

    • Current risk assessment (if available)

    Output

    • Tailored impact assessment

    Materials

    Participants

    • CIO
    • Infrastructure Manager
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. Define a set of questions to measure risk impact.
    2. For each question, assign a weight that should be placed on that factor.
    3. Define criteria for each question that would categorize the risk as high, medium, or low.
    4. Capture your results in section 4.3.1 of your Change Management SOP.
    Impact
    Weight Question High Medium Low
    15% # of people affected 36+ 11-35 <10
    20% # of sites affected 4+ 2-3 1
    15% Duration of recovery (minutes of business time) 180+ 30-18 <3
    20% Systems affected Mission critical Important Informational
    30% External customer impact Loss of customer Service interruption None

    1.2.4 Build a Classification Scheme to Define Likelihood

    Input

    • Current risk assessment (if available)

    Output

    • Tailored likelihood assessment

    Materials

    Participants

    • CIO
    • Infrastructure Manager
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. Define a set of questions to measure risk likelihood.
    2. For each question, assign a weight that should be placed on that factor.
    3. Define criteria for each question that would categorize the risk as high, medium, or low.
    4. Capture your results in section 4.3.2 of your Change Management SOP.
    LIKELIHOOD
    Weight Question High Medium Low
    25% Has this change been tested? No   Yes
    10% Have all the relevant groups (companies, departments, executives) vetted the change? No Partial Yes
    5% Has this change been documented? No   Yes
    15% How long is the change window? When can we implement? Specified day/time Partial Per IT choice
    20% Do we have trained and experienced staff available to implement this change? If only external consultants are available, the rating will be “medium” at best. No   Yes
    25% Has an implementation plan been developed? No   Yes

    1.2.5 Evaluate and Adjust Your Risk Assessment Scheme

    Input

    • Impact and likelihood assessments from previous two activities

    Output

    • Vetted risk assessment

    Materials

    Participants

    • CIO
    • Infrastructure Manager
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. Draw your risk matrix on a whiteboard or flip chart.
    2. As a group, identify up to 10 examples of requests for changes that would apply within your organization. Depending on the number of people participating, each person could identify one or two changes and write them on sticky notes.
    3. Take turns bringing your sticky notes up to the risk matrix and placing each where it belongs, according to the assessment criteria you defined.
    4. After each participant has taken a turn, discuss each change as a group and adjust the placement of any changes, if needed. Update the risk assessment weightings or questions, if needed.

    Download the Change Management Rick Assessment Tool.

    #

    Change Example

    Impact

    Likelihood

    Risk

    1

    ERP change

    High

    Medium

    Major

    2

    Ticket system go-live

    Medium

    Low

    Minor

    3

    UPS replacement

    Medium

    Low

    Minor

    4

    Network upgrade

    Medium

    Medium

    Medium

    5

    AD upgrade

    Medium

    Low

    Minor

    6

    High availability implementation

    Low

    Medium

    Minor

    7

    Key-card implementation

    Low

    High

    Medium

    8

    Anti-virus update

    Low

    Low

    Minor

    9

    Website

    Low

    Medium

    Minor

     

    Case Study

    A CMDB is not a prerequisite of change management. Don’t let the absence of a configuration management database (CMDB) prevent you from implementing change management.

    Industry: Manufacturing

    Source: Anonymous Info-Tech member

    Challenge

    The company was planning to implement a CMDB; however, full implementation was still one year away and subject to budget constraints.

    Without a CMDB, it would be difficult to understand the interdependencies between systems and therefore be able to provide notifications to potentially affected user groups prior to implementing technical changes.

    This could have derailed the change management project.

    Solution

    An Excel template was set up as a stopgap measure until the full implementation of the CMDB. The template included all identified dependencies between systems, along with a “dependency tier” for each IT service.

    Tier 1: The dependent system would not operate if the upstream system change resulted in an outage.

    Tier 2: The dependent system would suffer severe degradation of performance and/or features.

    Tier 3: The dependent system would see minor performance degradation or minor feature unavailability.

    Results

    As a stopgap measure, the solution worked well. When changes ran the risk of degrading downstream dependent systems, the impacted business system owner’s authorization was sought and end users were informed in advance.

    The primary takeaway was that a system to manage configuration linkages and system dependencies was key.

    While a CMDB is ideal for this use case, IT organizations shouldn’t let the lack of such a system stop progress on change management.

    Case Study (part 1 of 4)

    Intel used a maturity assessment to kick-start its new change management program.

    Industry: Technology

    Source: Daniel Grove, Intel

    Challenge

    Founded in 1968, the world’s largest microchip and semiconductor company employs over 100,000 people. Intel manufactures processors for major players in the PC market including Apple, Lenovo, HP, and Dell.

    Intel IT supports over 65,000 servers, 3.2 petabytes of data, over 70,000 PCs, and 2.6 million emails per day.

    Intel’s change management program is responsible for over 4,000 changes each week.

    Solution

    Due to the sheer volume of change management activities present at Intel, over 35% of unscheduled outages were the result of changes.

    Ineffective change management was identified as the top contributor of incidents with unscheduled downtime.

    One of the major issues highlighted was a lack of process ownership. The change management process at Intel was very fragmented, and that needed to change.

    Results

    Daniel Grove, Senior Release & Change Manager at Intel, identified that clarifying tasks for the Change Manager and the CAB would improve process efficiency by reducing decision lag time. Roles and responsibilities were reworked and clarified.

    Intel conducted a maturity assessment of the overall change management process to identify key areas for improvement.

    Phase 2

    Establish Roles and Workflows

    For running change management in DevOps environment, see Appendix II.

    Define Change Management

    1.1 Assess Maturity

    1.2 Categorize Changes and Build Your Risk Assessment

    Establish Roles and Workflows

    2.1 Determine Roles and Responsibilities

    2.2 Build Core Workflows

    Define RFC and Post-Implementation Activities

    3.1 Design the RFC

    3.2 Establish Post-Implementation Activities

    Measure, Manage, and Maintain

    4.1 Identify Metrics and Build the Change Calendar

    4.2 Implement the Project

    This phase will guide you through the following steps:

    • Determine Roles and Responsibilities
    • Build Core Workflows

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board

    Step 2.1

    Determine Roles and Responsibilities

    Activities

    2.1.1 Capture Roles and Responsibilities Using a RACI Chart

    2.1.2 Determine Your Change Manager’s Responsibilities

    2.1.3 Define the Authority and Responsibilities of Your CAB

    2.1.4 Determine an E-CAB Protocol for Your Organization

    Establish Roles and Workflows

    Step 2.1: Determine Roles and Responsibilities → Step 2.2: Build Core Workflows

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board

    Outcomes of this step

    • Clearly defined responsibilities to form the job description for a Change Manager
    • Clearly defined roles and responsibilities for the change management team, including the business system owner, technical SME, and CAB members
    • Defined responsibilities and authority of the CAB
    • Protocol for an emergency CAB (E-CAB) meeting

    Identify roles and responsibilities for your change management team

    Business System Owner

    • Provides downtime window(s)
    • Advises on need for change (prior to creation of RFC)
    • Validates change (through UAT or other validation as necessary)
    • Provides approval for expedited changes (needs to be at executive level)

    Technical Subject Matter Expert (SME)

    • Advises on proposed changes prior to RFC submission
    • Reviews draft RFC for technical soundness
    • Assesses backout/rollback plan
    • Checks if knowledgebase has been consulted for prior lessons learned
    • Participates in the PIR, if necessary
    • Ensures that the service desk is trained on the change

    CAB

    • Approves/rejects RFCs for normal changes
    • Reviews lessons learned from PIRs
    • Decides on the scope of change management
    • Reviews metrics and decides on remedial actions
    • Considers changes to be added to list of pre-approved changes
    • Communicates to organization about upcoming changes

    Change Manager

    • Reviews RFCs for completeness
    • Ensures RFCs brought to the CAB have a high chance of approval
    • Chairs CAB meetings, including scheduling, agenda preparation, reporting, and follow-ups
    • Manages post-implementation reviews and reporting
    • Organizes internal communications (within IT)

    2.1.1 Capture Roles and Responsibilities Using a RACI Chart

    Input

    • Current SOP

    Output

    • Documented roles and responsibilities in change management in a RACI chart

    Materials

    Participants

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. As a group, work through developing a RACI chart to determine the roles and responsibilities of individuals involved in the change management practice based on the following criteria:
      • Responsible (performs the work)
      • Accountable (ensures the work is done)
      • Consulted (two-way communication)
      • Informed (one-way communication)
    2. Record your results in slide 14 of the Project Summary Template and section 3.1 of your Change Management SOP.
    Change Management TasksOriginatorSystem OwnerChange ManagerCAB MemberTechnical SMEService DeskCIO/ VP ITE-CAB Member
    Review the RFC C C A C R C R  
    Validate changes C C A C R C R  
    Assess test plan A C R R C   I  
    Approve the RFC I C A R C   I  
    Create communications plan R I A     I I  
    Deploy communications plan I I A I   R    
    Review metrics   C A R   C I  
    Perform a post implementation review   C R A     I  
    Review lessons learned from PIR activities     R A   C    

    Designate a Change Manager to own the process, change templates, and tools

    The Change Manager will be the point of contact for all process questions related to change management.

    • The Change Manager needs the authority to reject change requests, regardless of the seniority of the requester.
    • The Change Manager needs the authority to enforce compliance to a standard process.
    • The Change Manager needs enough cross-functional subject-matter expertise to accurately evaluate the impact of change from both an IT and business perspective.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Some organizations will not be able to assign a dedicated Change Manager, but they must still task an individual with change review authority and with ownership of the risk assessment and other key parts of the process.

    Responsibilities

    1. The Change Manager is your first stop for change approval. Both the change management and release and deployment management processes rely on the Change Manager to function.
    2. Every single change that is applied to the live environment, from a single patch to a major change, must originate with a request for change (RFC), which is then approved by the Change Manager to proceed to the CAB for full approval.
    3. Change templates and tools, such as the change calendar, list of preapproved changes, and risk assessment template are controlled by the Change Manager.
    4. The Change Manager also needs to have ownership over gathering metrics and reports surrounding deployed changes. A skilled Change Manager needs to have an aptitude for applying metrics for continual improvement activities.

    2.1.2 Document Your Change Manager’s Responsibilities

    Input

    • Current Change Manager job description (if available)

    Output

    • Change Manager job description and list of responsibilities

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts (or shared screen if working remotely)
    • Markers/pens
    • Info-Tech’s Change Manager Job Description
    • Change Management SOP

    Participants

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board

    1.Using the previous slide, Info-Tech’s Change Manager Job Description, and the examples below, brainstorm responsibilities for the Change Manager.

    2.Record the responsibilities in Section 3.2 of your Change Management SOP.

    Example:

    Change Manager: James Corey

    Responsibilities

    1. Own the process, tools, and templates.
    2. Control the Change Management SOP.
    3. Provide standard RFC forms.
    4. Distribute RFCs for CAB review.
    5. Receive all initial RFCs and check them for completion.
    6. Approve initial RFCs.
    7. Approve pre-approved changes.
    8. Approve the conversion of normal changes to pre-approved changes.
    9. Assemble the Emergency CAB (E-CAB) when emergency change requests are received.
    10. Approve submission of RFCs for CAB review.
    11. Chair the CAB:
      • Set the CAB agenda and distribute it at least 24 hours before the meeting.
      • Ensure the agenda is adhered to.
      • Make the final approval/prioritization decision regarding a change if the CAB is deadlocked and cannot come to an agreement.
      • Distribute CAB meeting minutes to all members and relevant stakeholders.

    Download the Change Manager Job Description

    Create a Change Advisory Board (CAB) to provide process governance

    The primary functions of the CAB are to:

    1. Protect the live environment from poorly assessed, tested, and implemented changes.
      • CAB approval is required for all normal and emergency changes.
      • If a change results in an incident or outage, the CAB is effectively responsible; it’s the responsibility of the CAB to assess and accept the potential impact of every change.
    2. Prioritize changes in a way that fairly reflects change impact and urgency.
      • Change requests will originate from multiple stakeholders, some of whom have competing interests.
      • It’s up to the CAB to prioritize these requests effectively so that business need is balanced with any potential risk to the infrastructure.
      • The CAB should seek to reduce the number of emergency/expedited changes.
    3. Schedule deployments in a way that minimizes conflict and disruption.
      • The CAB uses a change calendar populated with project work, upcoming organizational initiatives, and change freeze periods. They will schedule changes around these blocks to avoid disrupting user productivity.
      • The CAB should work closely with the release and deployment management teams to coordinate change/release scheduling.

    See what responsibilities in the CAB’s process are already performed by the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. authorization, deconfliction etc.). Do not duplicate efforts.

    Use diverse representation from the business to form an effective CAB

    The CAB needs insight into all areas of the business to avoid approving a high-risk change.

    Based on the core responsibilities you have defined, the CAB needs to be composed of a diverse set of individuals who provide quality:

    • Change need assessments – identifying the value and purpose of a proposed change.
    • Change risk assessments – confirmation of the technical impact and likelihood assessments that lead to a risk score, based on the inputs in RFC.
    • Change scheduling – offer a variety of perspectives and responsibilities and will be able to identify potential scheduling conflicts.
     CAB RepresentationValue Added
    Business Members
    • CIO
    • Business Relationship Manager
    • Service Level Manager
    • Business Analyst
    • Identify change blackout periods, change impact, and business urgency.
    • Assess impact on fiduciary, legal, and/or audit requirements.
    • Determine acceptable business risk.
    IT Operations Members
    • Managers representing all IT functions
    • IT Directors
    • Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)
    • Identify dependencies and downstream impacts.
    • Identify possible conflicts with pre-existing OLAs and SLAs.
    CAB Attendees
    • Specific SMEs, tech specialists, and business and vendor reps relevant to a particular change
    • Only attend meetings when invited by the Change Manager
    • Provide detailed information and expertise related to their particular subject areas.
    • Speak to requirements, change impact, and cost.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Form a core CAB (members attend every week) and an optional CAB (members who attend only when a change impacts them or when they can provide value in discussions about a change). This way, members can have their voice heard without spending every week in a meeting where they do not contribute.

    2.1.3 Define the Authority and Responsibilities of Your CAB

    Input

    • Current SOP or CAB charter (if available)

    Output

    • Documented list of CAB authorities and responsibilities

    Materials

    Participants

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board

    1.Using the previous slide and the examples below, list the authorities and responsibilities of your CAB.

    2.Record the responsibilities in section 3.3.2 of your Change Management SOP and the Project Summary Template.

    Example:

    CAP AuthorityCAP Responsibilities
    • Final authority over the deployment of all normal and emergency changes.
    • Authority to absorb the risk of a change.
    • Authority to set the change calendar:
      • Maintenance windows.
      • Change freeze periods.
      • Project work.
      • Authority to delay changes.
    • Evaluate all normal and emergency changes.
    • Verify all normal change test, backout, and implementation plans.
    • Verify all normal change test results.
    • Approve all normal and emergency changes.
    • Prioritize all normal changes.
    • Schedule all normal and emergency changes.
    • Review failed change deployments.

    Establish an emergency CAB (E-CAB) protocol

    • When an emergency change request is received, you will not be able to wait until the regularly scheduled CAB meeting.
    • As a group, decide who will sit on the E-CAB and what their protocol will be when assessing and approving emergency changes.

    Change owner conferences with E-CAB (best efforts to reach them) through email or messaging.

    E-CAB members and business system owners are provided with change details. No decision is made without feedback from at least one E-CAB member.

    If business continuity is being affected, the Change Manager has authority to approve change.

    Full documentation of the change (a retroactive RFC) is done after the change and is then reviewed by the CAB.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Members of the E-CAB should be a subset of the CAB who are typically quick to respond to their messages, even at odd hours of the night.

    2.1.4 Determine an E-CAB Protocol for Your Organization

    Input

    • Current SOP or CAB charter (if available)

    Output

    • E-CAB protocol

    Materials

    Participants

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. Gather the members of the E-CAB and other necessary representatives from the change management team.
    2. Determine the order of operations for the E-CAB in the event that an emergency change is needed.
    3. Consult the example emergency protocol below. Determine what roles and responsibilities are involved at each stage of the emergency change’s implementation.
    4. Document the E-CAB protocol in section 3.4 of your Change Management SOP.

    Example

    Assemble E-CAB

    Assess Change

    Test (if Applicable)

    Deploy Change

    Create Retroactive RFC

    Review With CAB

    Step 2.2

    Build Core Workflows

    Activities

    2.2.1 Build a CMDB-lite as a Reference for Requested Changes

    2.2.2 Create a Normal Change Process

    2.2.3 Create a Pre-Approved Change Process

    2.2.4 Create an Emergency Change Process

    Establish Roles and Workflows

    Step 2.1: Determine Roles and Responsibilities → Step 2.2: Build Core Workflows

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board

    Outcomes of this step

    • Emergency change workflow
    • Normal process workflow
    • Pre-approved change workflow

    Establishing Workflows: Change Management Lifecycle

    Improve

    • A post-implementation review assesses the value of the actual change measured against the proposed change in terms of benefits, costs, and impact.
    • Results recorded in the change log.
    • Accountability: Change Manager Change Implementer

    Request

    • A change request (RFC) can be submitted via paper form, phone, email, or web portal.
    • Accountability: Change requester/Initiator

    Assess

    • The request is screened to ensure it meets an agreed-upon set of business criteria.
    • Changes are assessed on:
      • Impact of change
      • Risks or interdependencies
      • Resourcing and costs
    • Accountability: Change Manager

    Plan

    • Tasks are assigned, planned, and executed.
    • Change schedule is consulted and necessary resources are identified.
    • Accountability: Change Manager

    Approve

    • Approved requests are sent to the most efficient channel based on risk, urgency, and complexity.
    • Change is sent to CAB members for final review and approval
    • Accountability: Change Manager
      • Change Advisory Board

    Implement

    • Approved changes are deployed.
    • A rollback plan is created to mitigate risk.
    • Accountability: Change Manager Change Implementer

    Establishing workflows: employ a SIPOC model for process definition

    A good SIPOC (supplier, input, process, output, customer) model helps establish the boundaries of each process step and provides a concise definition of the expected outcomes and required inputs. It’s a useful and recommended next step for every workflow diagram.

    For change management, employ a SIPOC model to outline your CAB process:

    Supplier

    • Who or what organization provides the inputs to the process? The supplier can be internal or external.

    Input

    • What goes into the process step? This can be a document, data, information, or a decision.

    Process

    • Activities that occur in the process step that’s being analyzed.

    Output

    • What does the process step produce? This can be a document, data, information, or a decision.

    Customer

    • Who or what organization(s) takes the output of the process? The customer can be internal or external.

    Optional Fields

    Metrics

    • Top-level indicators that usually relate to the input and output, e.g. turnaround time, risk matrix completeness.

    Controls

    • Checkpoints to ensure process step quality.

    Dependencies

    • Other process steps that require the output.

    RACI

    • Those who are Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, or Informed (RACI) about the input, output, and/or process.

    Establish change workflows: assess requested changes to identify impact and dependencies

    An effective change assessment workflow is a holistic process that leaves no stone unturned in an effort to mitigate risk before any change reaches the approval stage. The four crucial areas of risk in a change workflow are:

    Dependencies

    Identify all components of the change.

    Ask how changes will affect:

    • Services on the same infrastructure?
    • Applications?
    • Infrastructure/app architecture?
    • Security?
    • Ability to support critical systems?

    Business Impact

    Frame the change from a business point of view to identify potential disruptions to business activities.

    Your assessment should cover:

    • Business processes
    • User productivity
    • Customer service
    • BCPs

    SLA Impact

    Each new change can impact the level of service available.

    Examine the impact on:

    • Availability of critical systems
    • Infrastructure and app performance
    • Infrastructure and app capacity
    • Existing disaster recovery plans and procedures

    Required Resources

    Once risk has been assessed, resources need to be identified to ensure the change can be executed.

    These include:

    • People (SMEs, tech support, work effort/duration)
    • System time for scheduled implementation
    • Hardware or software (new or existing, as well as tools)

    Establishing workflows: pinpoint dependencies to identify the need for additional changes

    An assessment of each change and a query of the CMDB needs to be performed as part of the change planning process to mitigate outage risk.

    • A version upgrade on one piece of software may require another component to be upgraded as well. For example, an upgrade to the database management system requires that an application that uses the database be upgraded or modified.
    • The sequence of the release must also be determined, as certain components may need to be upgraded before others. For example, if you upgrade the Exchange Server, a Windows update must be installed prior to the Exchange upgrade.
    • If you do not have a CMDB, consider building a CMDB-lite, which consists of a listing of systems, primary users, SMEs, business owners, and system dependencies (see next slide).

    Services Impacted

    • Have affected services been identified?
    • Have supporting services been identified?
    • Has someone checked the CMDB to ensure all dependencies have been accounted for?
    • Have we referenced the service catalog so the business approves what they’re authorizing?

    Technical Teams Impacted

    • Who will support the change throughout testing and implementation?
    • Will additional support be needed?
    • Do we need outside support from eternal suppliers?
    • Has someone checked the contract to ensure any additional costs have been approved?

    Build a dependency matrix to avoid change related collisions (optional)

    A CMDB-lite does not replace a CMDB but can be a valuable tool to leverage when requesting changes if you do not currently have configuration management. Consider the following inputs when building your own CMDB-lite.

    • System
      • To build a CMDB-lite, start with the top 10 systems in your environment that experience changes. This list can always be populated iteratively.
    • Primary Users
      • Listing the primary users will give a change requester a first glance at the impact of the change.
      • You can also use this information when looking at the change communication and training after the change is implemented.
    • SME/Backup
      • These are the staff that will likely build and implement the change. The backup is listed in case the primary is on holiday.
    • Business System Owner
      • The owner of the system is one of the people needed to sign off on the change. Having their support from the beginning of a change is necessary to build and implement it successfully.
    • Tier 1 Dependency
      • If the primary system experiences and outage, Tier 1 dependency functionality is also lost. To request a change, include the business system owner signoffs of the Tier 1 dependencies of the primary system.
    • Tier 2 Dependency
      • If the primary system experiences an outage, Tier 2 dependency functionality is lost, but there is an available workaround. As with Tier 1, this information can help you build a backout plan in case there is a change-related collision.
    • Tier 3 Dependency
      • Tier 3 functionality is not lost if the primary system experiences an outage, but nice-to-haves such as aesthetics are affected.

    2.2.1 Build a CMDB-lite as a Reference for Requested Changes

    Input

    • Current system ownership documentation

    Output

    • Documented reference for change requests (CMDB-lite)

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts (or shared screen if working remotely)
    • Sticky notes
    • Markers/pens

    Participants

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. Start with a list of your top 10-15 systems/services with the highest volume of changes.
    2. Using a whiteboard, flip chart, or shared screen, complete the table below by filling the corresponding Primary Users, SMEs, Business System Owner, and Dependencies as shown below. It may help to use sticky notes.
    3. Iteratively populate the table as you notice gaps with incoming changes.
    SystemPrimary UsersSMEBackup SME(s)Business System OwnerTier 1 Dependency (system functionality is down)Tier 2 (impaired functionality/ workaround available)Tier 3 Dependency (nice to have)
    Email Enterprise Naomi Amos James
    • ITSMs
    • Scan-to-email
    • Reporting
     
    • Lots
    Conferencing Tool Enterprise Alex Shed James
    • Videoconferencing
    • Conference rooms (can use Facebook messenger instead in worst case scenario)
    • IM
    ITSM (Service Now) Enterprise (Intl.) Anderson TBD Mike
    • Work orders
    • Dashboards
    • Purchasing
     
    ITSM (Manage Engine) North America Bobbie Joseph Mike
    • Work orders
    • Dashboards
    • Purchasing
     

    Establishing workflows: create standards for change approvals to improve efficiency

    • Not all changes are created equal, and not all changes require the same degree of approval. As part of the change management process, it’s important to define who is the authority for each type of change.
    • Failure to do so can create bureaucratic bottlenecks if each change is held to an unnecessary high level of scrutiny, or unplanned outages may occur due to changes circumventing the formal approval process.
    • A balance must be met and defined to ensure the process is not bypassed or bottlenecked.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Define a list pre-approved changes and automate them (if possible) using your ITSM solution. This will save valuable time for more important changes in the queue.

    Example:

    Change CategoryChange Authority
    Pre-approved change Department head/manager
    Emergency change E-CAB
    Normal change – low and medium risk CAB
    Normal change – high risk CAB and CIO (for visibility)

    Example process: Normal Change – Change Initiation

    Change initiation allows for assurance that the request is in scope for change management and acts as a filter for out-of-scope changes to be redirected to the proper workflow. Initiation also assesses who may be assigned to the change and the proper category of the change, and results in an RFC to be populated before the change reaches the build and test phase.

    The image is a horizontal flow chart, depicting an example of a change process.

    The change trigger assessment is critical in the DevOps lifecycle. This can take a more formal role of a technical review board (TRB) or, with enough maturity, may be automated. Responsibilities such as deconfliction, dependency identification, calendar query, and authorization identification can be done early in the lifecycle to decrease or eliminate the burden on CAB.

    For the full process, refer to the Change Management Process Library.

    Example process: Normal Change – Technical Build and Test

    The technical build and test stage includes all technical prerequisites and testing needed for a change to pass before proceeding to approval and implementation. In addition to a technical review, a solution consisting of the implementation, rollback, communications, and training plan are also built and included in the RFC before passing it to the CAB.

    The image is a flowchart, showing the process for change during the technical build and test stage.

    For the full process, refer to the Change Management Process Library.

    Example process: Normal Change – Change Approval (CAB)

    Change approval can start with the Change Manager reviewing all incoming RFCs to filter them for completeness and check them for red flags before passing them to the CAB. This saves the CAB from discussing incomplete changes and allows the Change Manager to set a CAB agenda before the CAB meeting. If need be, change approval can also set vendor communications necessary for changes, as well as the final implementation date of the change. The CAB and Change Manager may follow up with the appropriate parties notifying them of the approval decision (accepted, rescheduled, or rejected).

    The image shows a flowchart illustrating the process for change approval.

    For the full process, refer to the Change Management Process Library.

    Example process: Normal Change – Change Implementation

    Changes should not end at implementation. Ensure you define post-implementation activities (documentation, communication, training etc.) and a post-implementation review in case the change does not go according to plan.

    The image is a flowchart, illustrating the work process for change implementation and post-implementation review.

    For the full process, refer to the Change Management Process Library.

    2.2.2 Create a Normal Change Process

    Input

    • Current SOP/workflow library

    Output

    • Normal change process

    Materials

    Participants

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. Gather representatives from the change management team.
    2. Using the examples shown on the previous few slides, work as a group to determine the workflow for a normal change, with particular attention to the following sub-processes:
      1. Request
      2. Assessment
      3. Plan
      4. Approve
      5. Implementation and Post-Implementation Activities
    3. Optionally, you may create variations of the workflow for minor, medium, and major changes (e.g. there will be fewer authorizations for minor changes).
    4. For further documentation, you may choose to run the SIPOC activity for your CAB as outlined on this slide.
    5. Document the resulting workflows in the Change Management Process Library and section 11 of your Change Management SOP.

    Download the Change Management Process Library.

    Identify and convert low-risk normal changes to pre-approved once the process is established

    As your process matures, begin creating a list of normal changes that might qualify for pre-approval. The most potential for value in gains from change management comes from re-engineering and automating of high-volume changes. Pre-approved changes should save you time without threatening the live environment.

    IT should flag changes they would like pre-approved:

    • Once your change management process is firmly established, hold a meeting with all staff that make change requests and build changes.
    • Run a training session detailing the traits of pre-approved changes and ask these individuals to identify changes that might qualify.
    • These changes should be submitted to the Change Manager and reviewed, with the help of the CAB, to decide whether or not they qualify for pre-approval.

    Pre-approved changes are not exempt from due diligence:

    • Once a change is designated as pre-approved, the deployment team should create and compile all relevant documentation:
      • An RFC detailing the change, dependencies, risk, and impact.
      • Detailed procedures and required resources.
      • Implementation and backout plan.
      • Test results.
    • When templating the RFC for pre-approved changes, aim to write the documentation as if another SME were to implement it. This reduces confusion, especially if there’s staff turnover.
    • The CAB must approve, sign off, and keep a record of all documents.
    • Pre-approved changes must still be documented and recorded in the CMDB and change log after each deployment.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    At the beginning of a change management process, there should be few active pre-approved changes. However, prior to launch, you may have IT flag changes for conversion.

    Example process: Pre-Approved Change Process

    The image shows two horizontal flow charts, the first labelled Pre-Approval of Recurring RFC, and the second labelled Implementation of Child RFC.

    For the full process, refer to the Change Management Process Library.

    Review the pre-approved change list regularly to ensure the list of changes are still low-risk and repeatable.

    IT environments change. Don’t be caught by surprise.

    • Changes which were once low-risk and repeatable may cause unforeseen incidents if they are not reviewed regularly.
    • Dependencies change as the IT environment changes. Ensure that the changes on the pre-approved change list are still low-risk and repeatable, and that the documentation is up to date.
    • If dependencies have changed, then move the change back to the normal category for reassessment. It may be redesignated as a pre-approved change once the documentation is updated.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Other reasons for moving a pre-approved change back to the normal category is if the change led to an incident during implementation or if there was an issue during implementation.

    Seek new pre-approved change submissions. → Re-evaluate the pre-approved change list every 4-6 months.

    The image shows a horizontal flow chart, depicting the process for a pre-approved change list review.

    For the full process, refer to the Change Management Process Library.

    2.2.3 Create a Pre-Approved Change Process

    Input

    • Current SOP/workflow library

    Output

    • Pre-approved change process

    Materials

    Participants

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. Gather representatives from the change management team.
    2. Using the examples shown on the previous few slides, work as a group to determine the workflow for a pre-approved change, with particular attention to the following sub-processes:
      1. Request
      2. Assessment
      3. Plan
      4. Approve
    3. Document the process of a converting a normal change to pre-approved. Include the steps from flagging a low-risk change to creating the related RFC template.
    4. Document the resulting workflows in the Change Management Process Library and sections 4.2 and 13 of your Change Management SOP.

    Reserve the emergency designation for real emergencies

    • Emergency changes have one of the following triggers:
      • A critical incident is impacting user productivity.
      • An imminent critical incident will impact user productivity.
    • Unless a critical incident is being resolved or prevented, the change should be categorized as normal.
    • An emergency change differs from a normal change in the following key aspects:
      • An emergency change is required to recover from a major outage – there must be a validated service desk critical incident ticket.
      • An urgent business requirement is not an “emergency.”
      • An RFC is created after the change is implemented and the outage is over.
      • A review by the full CAB occurs after the change is implemented.
      • The first responder and/or the person implementing the change may not be the subject matter expert for that system.
    • In all cases, an RFC must be created and the change must be reviewed by the full CAB. The review should occur within two business days of the event.
    Sample ChangeQuick CheckEmergency?
    Install the latest critical patches from the vendor. Are the patches required to resolve or prevent an imminent critical incident? No
    A virus or worm invades the network and a patch is needed to eliminate the threat. Is the patch required to resolve or prevent an imminent critical incident? Yes

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Change requesters should be made aware that senior management will be informed if an emergency RFC is submitted inappropriately. Emergency requests trigger urgent CAB meetings, are riskier to deploy, and delay other changes waiting in the queue.

    Example process: Emergency Change Process

    The image is a flowchart depicting the process for an emergency change process

    When building your emergency change process, have your E-CAB protocol from activity 2.1.4 handy.

    • Focus on the following requirements for an emergency process:
      • E-CAB protocol and scope: Does the SME need authorization first before working on the change or can the SME proceed if no E-CAB members respond?
      • Documentation and communication to stakeholders and CAB after the emergency change is completed.
      • Input from incident management.

    For the full process, refer to the Change Management Process Library.

    2.2.4 Create an Emergency Change Process

    Input

    • Current SOP/workflow library

    Output

    • Emergency change process

    Materials

    Participants

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. Gather representatives from the change management team.
    2. Using the examples shown on the previous few slides, work as a group to determine the workflow for an emergency change, with particular attention to the following sub-processes:
      1. Request
      2. Assessment
      3. Plan
      4. Approve
    3. Ensure that the E-CAB protocol from activity 2.1.4 is considered when building your process.
    4. Document the resulting workflows in the Change Management Process Library and section 12 of your Change Management SOP.

    Case Study (part 2 of 4)

    Intel implemented a robust change management process.

    Industry: Technology

    Source: Daniel Grove, Intel

    Challenge

    Founded in 1968, the world’s largest microchip and semiconductor company employs over 100,000 people. Intel manufactures processors for major players in the PC market including Apple, Lenovo, HP, and Dell.

    Intel IT supports over 65,000 servers, 3.2 petabytes of data, over 70,000 PCs, and 2.6 million emails per day.

    Intel’s change management program is responsible for over 4,000 changes each week.

    Solution

    Intel identified 37 different change processes and 25 change management systems of record with little integration.

    Software and infrastructure groups were also very siloed, and this no doubt contributed to the high number of changes that caused outages.

    The task was simple: standards needed to be put in place and communication had to improve.

    Results

    Once process ownership was assigned and the role of the Change Manager and CAB clarified, it was a simple task to streamline and simplify processes among groups.

    Intel designed a new, unified change management workflow that all groups would adopt.

    Automation was also brought into play to improve how RFCs were generated and submitted.

    Phase 3

    Define the RFC and Post-Implementation Activities

    Define Change Management

    1.1 Assess Maturity

    1.2 Categorize Changes and Build Your Risk Assessment

    Establish Roles and Workflows

    2.1 Determine Roles and Responsibilities

    2.2 Build Core Workflows

    Define the RFC and Post-Implementation Activities

    3.1 Design the RFC

    3.2 Establish Post-Implementation Activities

    Measure, Manage, and Maintain

    4.1 Identify Metrics and Build the Change Calendar

    4.2 Implement the Project

    This phase will guide you through the following activities:

    • Design the RFC
    • Establish Post-Implementation Activities

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • IT Director
    • Infrastructure Manager
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board

    Step 3.1

    Design the RFC

    Activities

    3.1.1 Evaluate Your Existing RFC Process

    3.1.2 Build the RFC Form

    Define the RFC and Post-Implementation Activities

    Step 3.1: Design the RFC

    Step 3.2: Establish Post-Implementation Activities

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board

    Outcomes of this step

    • A full RFC template and process that compliments the workflows for the three change categories

    A request for change (RFC) should be submitted for every non-standard change

    An RFC should be submitted through the formal change management practice for every change that is not a standard, pre-approved change (a change which does not require submission to the change management practice).

    • The RFC should contain all the information required to approve a change. Some information will be recorded when the change request is first initiated, but not everything will be known at that time.
    • Further information can be added as the change progresses through its lifecycle.
    • The level of detail that goes into the RFC will vary depending on the type of change, the size, and the likely impact of the change.
    • Other details of the change may be recorded in other documents and referenced in the RFC.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Keep the RFC form simple, especially when first implementing change management, to encourage the adoption of and compliance with the process.

    RFCs should contain the following information, at a minimum:

    1. Contact information for requester
    2. Description of change
    3. References to external documentation
    4. Items to be changed, reason for the change, and impact of both implementing and not implementing the change
    5. Change type and category
    6. Priority and risk assessment
    7. Predicted time frame, resources, and cost
    8. Backout or remediation plan
    9. Proposed approvers
    10. Scheduled implementation time
    11. Communications plan and post-implementation review

    3.1.1 Evaluate Your Existing RFC Process

    Input

    • Current RFC form or stock ITSM RFC
    • Current SOP (if available)

    Output

    • List of changes to the current RFC form and RFC process

    Materials

    Participants

    • IT Director
    • Infrastructure Manager
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. If the organization is already using an RFC form, review it as a group now and discuss its contents:
      • Does this RFC provide adequate information for the Change Manager and/or CAB to review?
      • Should any additional fields be added?
    2. Show the participants Info-Tech’s Request for Change Form Template and compare it to the one the organization is currently using.
    3. As a group, finalize an RFC table of contents that will be used to formalize a new or improved RFC.
    4. Decide which fields should be filled out by the requester before the initial RFC is submitted to the Change Manager:
      • Many sections of the RFC are relevant for change assessment and review. What information does the Change Manager need when they first receive a request?
      • The Change Manager needs enough information to ensure that the change is in scope and has been properly categorized.
    5. Decide how the RFC form should be submitted and reviewed; this can be documented in section 5 of your Change Management SOP.

    Download the Request for Change Form Template.

    Design the RFC to encourage process buy-in

    • When building the RFC, split the form up into sections that follow the normal workflow (e.g. Intake, Assessment and Build, Approval, Implementation/PIR). This way the form walks the requester through what needs to be filled and when.
    • Revisit the form periodically and solicit feedback to continually improve the user experience. If there’s information missing on the RFC that the CAB would like to know, add the fields. If there are sections that are not used or not needed for documentation, remove them.
    • Make sure the user experience surrounding your RFC form is a top priority – make it accessible, otherwise change requesters simply will not use it.
    • Take advantage of your ITSM’s dropdown lists, automated notifications, CMDB integrations, and auto-generated fields to ease the process of filling the RFC

    Draft:

    • Change requester
    • Requested date of deployment
    • Change risk: low/medium/high
    • Risk assessment
    • Description of change
    • Reason for change
    • Change components

    Technical Build:

    • Assess change:
      • Dependencies
      • Business impact
      • SLA impact
      • Required resources
      • Query the CMS
    • Plan and test changes:
      • Test plan
      • Test results
      • Implementation plan
      • Backout plan
      • Backout plan test results

    CAB:

    • Approve and schedule changes:
      • Final CAB review
      • Communications plan

    Complete:

    • Deploy changes:
      • Post-implementation review

    Designing your RFC: RFC draft

    • Change requester – link your change module to the active directory to pull the change requester’s contact information automatically to save time.
    • A requested date of deployment gives approvers information on timeline and can be used to query the change calendar for possible conflicts
    • Information about risk assessment based on impact and likelihood questionnaires are quick to fill out but provide a lot of information to the CAB. The risk assessment may not be complete at the draft stage but can be updated as the change is built. Ensure this field is up-to- date before it reaches CAB.
    • If you have a technical review stage where changes are directed to the proper workflow and resourcing is assessed, the description, reason, and change components are high-level descriptors of the change that will aid in discovery and lining the change up with the business vision (viability from both a technical and business standpoint).
    • Change requester
    • Requested date of deployment
    • Change Risk: low/medium/high
    • Risk assessment
    • Description of change
    • Reason for change
    • Change components

    Use the RFC to point to documentation already gathered in the DevOps lifecycle to cut down on unnecessary manual work while maintaining compliance.

    Designing your RFC: technical build

    • Dependencies and CMDB query, along with the proposed implementation date, are included to aid in calendar deconfliction and change scheduling. If there’s a conflict, it’s easier to reschedule the proposed change early in the lifecycle.
    • Business, SLA impact, and required resources can be tracked to provide the CAB with information on the business resources required. This can also be used to prioritize the change if conflicts arise.
    • Implementation, test, and backout plans must be included and assessed to increase the probability that a change will be implemented without failure. It’s also useful in the case of PIRs to determine root causes of change-related incidents.
    • Assess change:
      • Dependencies
      • Business impact
      • SLA impact
      • Required resources
      • Query the CMS
    • Plan and test changes:
      • Test plan
      • Test results
      • Implementation plan
      • Backout plan
      • Backout plan test results

    Designing your RFC: approval and deployment

    • Documenting approval, rejection, and rescheduling gives the change requester the go-ahead to proceed with the change, rationale on why it was prioritized lower than another change (rescheduled), or rationale on rejection.
    • Communications plans for appropriate stakeholders can also be modified and forwarded to the communications team (e.g. service desk or business system owners) before deployment.
    • Post-implementation activities and reviews can be conducted if need be before a change is closed. The PIR, if filled out, should then be appended to any subsequent changes of the same nature to avoid making the same mistake twice.
    • Approve and schedule changes:
      • Final CAB review
      • Communications plan
    • Deploy changes:
      • Post-implementation review

    Standardize the request for change protocol

    1. Submission Standards
      • Electronic submission will make it easier for CAB members to review the documentation.
      • As the change goes through the assessment, plan, and test phase, new documentation (assessments, backout plans, test results, etc.) can be attached to the digital RFC for review by CAB members prior to the CAB meeting.
      • Change management software won’t be necessary to facilitate the RFC submission and review; a content repository system, such as SharePoint, will suffice.
    2. Designate the first control point
      • All RFCs should be submitted to a single point of contact.
      • Ideally, the Change Manager or Technical Review Board should fill this role.
      • Whoever is tasked with this role needs the subject matter expertise to ensure that the change has been categorized correctly, to reject out-of-scope requests, or to ask that missing information be provided before the RFC moves through the full change management practice.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Technical and SME contacts should be noted in each RFC so they can be easily consulted during the RFC review.

    3.1.2 Build the RFC Form

    Input

    • Current RFC form or stock ITSM RFC
    • Current SOP (if available)

    Output

    • List of changes to the current RFC and RFC process

    Materials

    Participants

    • IT Director
    • Infrastructure Manager
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. Use Info-Tech’s Request for Change Form Template as a basis for your RFC form.
    2. Use this template to standardize your change request process and ensure that the appropriate information is documented effectively each time a request is made. The change requester and Change Manager should consolidate all information associated with a given change request in this form. This form will be submitted by the change requester and reviewed by the Change Manager.

    Case Study (part 3 of 4)

    Intel implemented automated RFC form generation.

    Industry: Technology

    Source: Daniel Grove, Intel

    Challenge

    Founded in 1968, the world’s largest microchip and semiconductor company employs over 100,000 people. Intel manufactures processors for major players in the PC market including Apple, Lenovo, HP, and Dell.

    Intel IT supports over 65,000 servers, 3.2 petabytes of data, over 70,000 PCs, and 2.6 million emails per day.

    Intel’s change management program is responsible for over 4,000 changes each week.

    Solution

    One of the crucial factors that was impacting Intel’s change management efficiency was a cumbersome RFC process.

    A lack of RFC usage was contributing to increased ad hoc changes being put through the CAB, and rescheduled changes were quite high.

    Additionally, ad hoc changes were also contributing heavily to unscheduled downtime within the organization.

    Results

    Intel designed and implemented an automated RFC form generator to encourage end users to increase RFC usage.

    As we’ve seen with RFC form design, the UX/UI of the form needs to be top notch, otherwise end users will simply circumvent the process. This will contribute to the problems you are seeking to correct.

    Thanks to increased RFC usage, Intel decreased emergency changes by 50% and reduced change-caused unscheduled downtime by 82%.

    Step 3.2

    Establish Post-Implementation Activities

    Activities

    3.2.1 Determine When the CAB Would Reject Tested Changes

    3.2.2 Create a Post-Implementation Activity Checklist

    Define the RFC and Post-Implementation Activities

    Step 3.1: Design RFC

    Step 3.2: Establish Post-Implementation Activities

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board

    Outcomes of this step

    • A formalized post-implementation process for continual improvement

    Why would the CAB reject a change that has been properly assessed and tested?

    Possible reasons the CAB would reject a change include:

    • The product being changed is approaching its end of life.
    • The change is too costly.
    • The timing of the change conflicts with other changes.
    • There could be compliance issues.
    • The change is actually a project.
    • The risk is too high.
    • There could be regulatory issues.
    • The peripherals (test, backout, communication, and training plans) are incomplete.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Many reasons for rejection (listed above) can be caught early on in the process during the technical review or change build portion of the change. The earlier you catch these reasons for rejection, the less wasted effort there will be per change.

    Sample RFCReason for CAP Rejection
    There was a request for an update to a system that a legacy application depends on and only a specific area of the business was aware of the dependency. The CAB rejects it due to the downstream impact.
    There was a request for an update to a non-supported application, and the vendor was asking for a premium support contract that is very costly. It’s too expensive to implement, despite the need for it. The CAB will wait for an upgrade to a new application.
    There was a request to update application functionality to a beta release. The risk outweighs the business benefits.

    Determine When the CAB Would Reject Tested Changes

    Input

    • Current SOP (if available)

    Output

    • List of reasons to reject tested changes

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts (or shared screen if working remotely)
    • Projector
    • Markers/pens
    • Laptop with ITSM admin access
    • Project Summary Template

    Participants

    • IT Director
    • Infrastructure Manager
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board

    Avoid hand-offs to ensure a smooth implementation process

    The implementation phase is the final checkpoint before releasing the new change into your live environment. Once the final checks have been made to the change, it’s paramount that teams work together to transition the change effectively rather than doing an abrupt hand-off. This could cause a potential outage.

    1.

    • Deployment resources identified, allocated, and scheduled
    • Documentation complete
    • Support team trained
    • Users trained
    • Business sign-off
    • Target systems identified and ready to receive changes
    • Target systems available for installation maintenance window scheduled
    • Technical checks:
      • Disk space available
      • Pre-requisites met
      • Components/Services to be updated are stopped
      • All users disconnected
    • Download Info-Tech’sChange Management Pre-Implementation Checklist

    Implement change →

    2.

    1. Verification – once the change has been implemented, verify that all requirements are fulfilled.
    2. Review – ensure that all affected systems and applications are operating as predicted. Update change log.
    3. Transition – a crucial phase of implementation that’s often overlooked. Once the change implementation is complete from a technical point of view, it’s imperative that the team involved with the change inform and train the group responsible for managing the new change.

    Create a backout plan to reduce the risk of a failed change

    Every change process needs to plan for the potential for failure and how to address it effectively. Change management’s solution to this problem is a backout plan.

    A backout plan needs to contain a record of the steps that need to be taken to restore the live environment back to its previous state and maintain business continuity. A good backout plan asks the following questions:

    1. How will failure be determined? Who will make the determination to back out of a change be made and when?
    2. Do we fix on fail or do we rollback to the previous configuration?
    3. Is the service desk aware of the impending change? Do they have proper training?

    Notify the Service Desk

    • Notify the Service Desk about backout plan initiation.

    Disable Access

    • Disable user access to affected system(s).

    Conduct Checks

    • Conduct checks to all affected components.

    Enable User Access

    • Enable user access to affected systems.

    Notify the Service Desk

    • Notify the service desk that the backout plan was successful.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    As part of the backout plan, consider the turnback point in the change window. That is, the point within the change window where you still have time to fully back out of the change.

    Ensure the following post-implementation review activities are completed

    Service Catalog

    Update the service catalog with new information as a result of the implemented change.

    CMDB

    Update new dependencies present as a result of the new change.

    Asset DB

    Add notes about any assets newly affected by changes.

    Architecture Map

    Update your map based on the new change.

    Technical Documentation

    Update your technical documentation to reflect the changes present because of the new change.

    Training Documentation

    Update your training documentation to reflect any information about how users interact with the change.

    Use a post-implementation review process to promote continual improvement

    The post-implementation review (PIR) is the most neglected change management activity.

    • All changes should be reviewed to understand the reason behind them, appropriateness, and recommendations for next steps.
    • The Change Manager manages the completion of information PIRs and invites RFC originators to present their findings and document the lessons learned.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Review PIR reports at CAB meetings to highlight the root causes of issues, action items to close identified gaps, and back-up documentation required. Attach the PIR report to the relevant RFC to prevent similar changes from facing the same issues in the future.

    1. Why do a post-implementation review?
      • Changes that don’t fail but don’t perform well are rarely reviewed.
      • Changes may fail subtly and still need review.
      • Changes that cause serious failures (i.e. unplanned downtime) receive analysis that is unnecessarily in-depth.
    2. What are the benefits?
      • A proactive, post-implementation review actually uses less resources than reactionary change reviews.
      • Root-cause analysis of failed changes, no matter what the impact.
      • Insight into changes that took longer than projected.
      • Identification of previously unidentified risks affecting changes.

    Determine the strategy for your PIR to establish a standardized process

    Capture the details of your PIR process in a table similar to the one below.

    Frequency Part of weekly review (IT team meeting)
    Participants
    • Change Manager
    • Originator
    • SME/supervisor/impacted team(s)

    Categories under review

    Current deviations and action items from previous PIR:

    • Complete
    • Partially complete
    • Complete, late
    • Change failed, rollback succeeded
    • Change failed, rollback failed
    • Major deviation from implementation plan
    Output
    • Root cause or failure or deviation
    • External factors
    • Remediation focus areas
    • Remediation timeline (follow-up at appropriate time)
    Controls
    • Reviewed at next CAB meeting
    • RFC close is dependent on completion of PIR
    • Share with the rest of the technical team
    • Lessons learned stored in the knowledgebase and attached to RFC for easy search of past issues.

    3.2.2 Create a Post-Implementation Activity Checklist

    Input

    • Current SOP (if available)

    Output

    • List of reasons to reject tested changes

    Materials

    Participants

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. Gather representatives from the change management team.
    2. Brainstorm duties to perform following the deployment of a change. Below is a sample list:
      • Example:
        • Was the deployment successful?
          • If no, was the backout plan executed successfully?
        • List change-related incidents
        • Change assessment
          • Missed dependencies
          • Inaccurate business impact
          • Incorrect SLA impact
          • Inaccurate resources
            • Time
            • Staff
            • Hardware
        • System testing
        • Integration testing
        • User acceptance testing
        • No backout plan
        • Backout plan failure
        • Deployment issues
    3. Record your results in the Change Management Post-Implementation Checklist.

    Download the Change Management Post-Implementation Checklist

    Case Study

    Microsoft used post-implementation review activities to mitigate the risk of a critical Azure outage.

    Industry: Technology

    Source: Jason Zander, Microsoft

    Challenge

    In November 2014, Microsoft deployed a change intended to improve Azure storage performance by reducing CPU footprint of the Azure Table Front-Ends.

    The deployment method was an incremental approach called “flighting,” where software and configuration deployments are deployed incrementally to Azure infrastructure in small batches.

    Unfortunately, this software deployment caused a service interruption in multiple regions.

    Solution

    Before the software was deployed, Microsoft engineers followed proper protocol by testing the proposed update. All test results pointed to a successful implementation.

    Unfortunately, engineers pushed the change out to the entire infrastructure instead of adhering to the traditional flighting protocol.

    Additionally, the configuration switch was incorrectly enabled for the Azure Blob storage Front-Ends.

    A combination of the two mistakes exposed a bug that caused the outage.

    Results

    Thankfully, Microsoft had a backout plan. Within 30 minutes, the change was rolled back on a global scale.

    It was determined that policy enforcement was not integrated across the deployment system. An update to the system shifted the process of policy enforcement from human-based decisions and protocol to automation via the deployment platform.

    Defined PIR activities enabled Microsoft to take swift action against the outage and mitigate the risk of a serious outage.

    Phase 4

    Measure, Manage, and Maintain

    Define Change Management

    1.1 Assess Maturity

    1.2 Categorize Changes and Build Risk Assessment

    Establish Roles and Workflows

    2.1 Determine Roles and Responsibilities

    2.2 Build Core Workflows

    Define RFC and Post-Implementation Activities

    3.1 Design RFC

    3.2 Establish post-implementation activities

    Measure, Manage, and Maintain

    4.1 Identify Metrics and Build the Change Calendar

    4.2 Implement the Project

    This phase will guide you through the following activities:

    • Identify Metrics and Build the Change Calendar
    • Implement the Project

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • CIO/IT Director
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager

    Step 4.1

    Identify Metrics and Build the Change Calendar

    Activities

    4.1.1 Create an Outline for Your Change Calendar

    4.1.2 Determine Metrics, Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), and Critical Success Factors (CSFs)

    4.1.3 Track and Record Metrics Using the Change Management Metrics Tool

    Measure, Manage, and Maintain

    Step 4.1: Identify Metrics and Build the Change Calendar

    Step 4.2: Implement the Project

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO/IT Director
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager

    Outcomes of this step

    • Clear definitions of change calendar content
    • Guidelines for change calendar scheduling
    • Defined metrics to measure the success of change management with associated reports, KPIs, and CSFs

    Enforce a standard method of prioritizing and scheduling changes

    The impact of not deploying the change and the benefit of deploying it should determine its priority.

    Risk of Not Deploying

    • What is the urgency of the change?
    • What is the risk to the organization if the change is not deployed right away?
    • Will there be any lost productivity, service disruptions, or missed critical business opportunities?
      • Timing
        • Does the proposed timing work with the approved changes already on the change schedule?
        • Has the change been clash checked so there are no potential conflicts over services or resources?
      • Once prioritized, a final deployment date should be set by the CAB. Check the change calendar first to avoid conflicts.

    Positive Impact of Deployment

    • What benefits will be realized once the change is deployed?
    • How significant is the opportunity that triggered the change?
    • Will the change lead to a positive business outcome (e.g. increased sales)?

    “The one who has more clout or authority is usually the one who gets changes scheduled in the time frame they desire, but you should really be evaluating the impact to the organization. We looked at the risk to the business of not doing the change, and that’s a good way of determining the criticality and urgency of that change.” – Joseph Sgandurra, Director, Service Delivery, Navantis

    Info-Tech Insight

    Avoid a culture where powerful stakeholders are able to push change deployment on an ad hoc basis. Give the CAB the full authority to make approval decisions based on urgency, impact, cost, and availability of resources.

    Develop a change schedule to formalize the planning process

    A change calendar will help the CAB schedule changes more effectively and increase visibility into upcoming changes across the organization.

    1. Establish change windows in a consistent change schedule:
      • Compile a list of business units that would benefit from a change.
      • Look for conflicts in the change schedule.
      • Avoid scheduling two or more major business units in a day.
      • Consider clients when building your change windows and change schedule.
    2. Gain commitments from key participants:
      • These individuals can confirm if there are any unusual or cyclical business requirements that will impact the schedule.
    3. Properly control your change calendar to improve change efficiency:
      • Look at the proposed start and end times: Are they sensible? Does the implementation window leave time for anything going wrong or needing to roll back the change?
      • Special considerations: Are there special circumstances that need to be considered? Ask the business if you don’t know.
      • The key principle is to have a sufficient window available for implementing changes so you only need to set up calendar freezes for sound business or technical reasons.

    Our mantra is to put it on the calendar. Even if it’s a preapproved change and doesn’t need a vote, having it on the calendar helps with visibility. The calendar is the one-stop shop for scheduling and identifying change dependencies.“ – Wil Clark, Director of Service and Performance Management, University of North Texas Systems

    Provide clear definitions of what goes on the change calendar and who’s responsible

    Roles

    • The Change Manager will be responsible for creating and maintaining a change calendar.
    • Only the Change Manager can physically alter the calendar by adding a new change after the CAB has agreed upon a deployment date.
    • All other CAB members, IT support staff, and other impacted stakeholders should have access to the calendar on a read-only basis to prevent people from making unauthorized changes to deployment dates.

    Inputs

    • Freeze periods for individual business departments/applications (e.g. finance month-end periods, HR payroll cycle, etc. – all to be investigated).
    • Maintenance windows and planned outage periods.
    • Project schedules, and upcoming major/medium changes.
    • Holidays.
    • Business hours (some departments work 9-5, others work different hours or in different time zones, and user acceptance testing may require business users to be available).

    Guidelines

    • Business-defined freeze periods are the top priority.
    • No major or medium normal changes should occur during the week between Christmas and New Year’s Day.
    • Vendor SLA support hours are the preferred time for implementing changes.
    • The vacation calendar for IT will be considered for major changes.
    • Change priority: High > Medium > Low.
    • Minor changes and preapproved changes have the same priority and will be decided on a case-by-case basis.

    The change calendar is a critical pre-requisite to change management in DevOps. Use the calendar to be proactive with proposed implementation dates and deconfliction before the change is finished.

    4.1.1 Create Guidelines for Your Change Calendar

    Input

    • Current change calendar guidelines

    Output

    • Change calendar inputs and schedule checklist

    Materials

    Participants

    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Operations (optional)
    1. Gather representatives from the change management team.
      • Example:
        • The change calendar/schedule includes:
          • Approved and scheduled normal changes.
          • Scheduled project work.
          • Scheduled maintenance windows.
          • Change freeze periods with affected users noted:
            • Daily/weekly freeze periods.
            • Monthly freeze periods.
            • Annual freeze periods.
            • Other critical business events.
    2. Create a checklist to run through before each change is scheduled:
      • Check the schedule and assess resource availability:
        • Will user productivity be impacted?
        • Are there available resources (people and systems) to implement the change?
        • Is the vendor available? Is there a significant cost attached to pushing change deployment before the regularly scheduled refresh?
        • Are there dependencies? Does the deployment of one change depend on the earlier deployment of another?
    3. Record your results in your Project Summary Template.

    Start measuring the success of your change management project using three key metrics

    Number of change-related incidents that occur each month

    • Each month, record the number of incidents that can be directly linked to a change. This can be done using an ITSM tool or manually by service desk staff.
    • This is a key success metric: if you are not tracking change-related incidents yet, start doing so as soon as possible. This is the metric that the CIO and business stakeholders will be most interested in because it impacts users directly.

    Number of unauthorized changes applied each month

    • Each month, record the number of changes applied without approval. This is the best way to measure adherence to the process.
    • If this number decreases, it demonstrates a reduction in risk, as more changes are formally assessed and approved before being deployed.

    Percentage of emergency changes

    • Each month, compare the number of emergency change requests to the total number of change requests.
    • Change requesters often designate changes as emergencies as a way of bypassing the process.
    • A reduction in emergency changes demonstrates that your process is operating smoothly and reduces the risk of deploying changes that have not been properly tested.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Start simple. Metrics can be difficult to tackle if you’re starting from scratch. While implementing your change management practice, use these three metrics as a starting point, since they correlate well with the success of change management overall. The following few slides provide more insight into creating metrics for your change process.

    If you want more insight into your change process, measure the progress of each step in change management with metrics

    Improve

    • Number of repeat failures (i.e. making the same mistake twice)
    • Number of changes converted to pre-approved
    • Number of changes converted from pre-approved back to normal

    Request

    • What percentage of change requests have errors or lack appropriate support?
    • What percentage of change requests are actually projects, service requests, or operational tasks?
    • What percentage of changes have been requested before (i.e. documented)?

    Assess

    • What percentage of change requests are out of scope?
    • What percentage of changes have been requested before (i.e. documented)?
    • What are the percentages of changes by category (normal, pre-approved, emergency)?

    Plan

    • What percentage of change requests are reviewed by the CAB that should have been pre-approved or emergency (i.e. what percentage of changes are in the wrong category)?

    Approve

    • Number of changes broken down by department (business unit/IT department to be used in making core/optional CAB membership more efficient)
    • Number of workflows that can be automated

    Implement

    • Number of changes completed on schedule
    • Number of changes rolled back
    • What percentage of changes caused an incident?

    Use metrics to inform project KPIs and CSFs

    Leverage the metrics from the last slide and convert them to data communicable to IT, management, and leadership

    • To provide value, metrics and measurements must be actionable. What actions can be taken as a result of the data being presented?
    • If the metrics are not actionable, there is no value and you should question the use of the metric.
    • Data points in isolation are mostly meaningless to inform action. Observe trends in your metrics to inform your decisions.
    • Using a framework to develop measurements and metrics provides a defined methodology that enables a mapping of base measurements through CSFs.
    • Establishing the relationship increases the value that measurements provide.

    Purposely use SDLC and change lifecycle metrics to find bottlenecks and automation candidates.

    Metrics:

    Metrics are easily measured datapoints that can be pulled from your change management tool. Examples: Number of changes implemented, number of changes without incident.

    KPIs:

    Key Performance Indicators are metrics presented in a way that is easily digestible by stakeholders in IT. Examples: Change efficiency, quality of changes.

    CSFs:

    Critical Success Factors are measures of the business success of change management taken by correlating the CSF with multiple KPIs. Examples: consistent and efficient change management process, a change process mapped to business needs

    List in-scope metrics and reports and align them to benefits

    Metric/Report (by team)Benefit
    Total number of RFCs and percentages by category (pre-approved, normal, emergency, escalated support, expedited)
    • Understand change management activity
    • Tracking maturity growth
    • Identifying “hot spots”
    Pre-approved change list (and additions/removals from the list) Workload and process streamlining (i.e. reduce “red tape” wherever possible)
    Average time between RFC lifecycle stages (by service/application) Advance planning for proposed changes
    Number of changes by service/application/hardware class
    • Identifying weaknesses in the architecture
    • Vendor-specific TCO calculations
    Change triggers Business- vs. IT-initiated change
    Number of RFCs by lifecycle stage Workload planning
    List of incidents related to changes Visible failures of the CM process
    Percentage of RFCs with a tested backout/validation plan Completeness of change planning
    List of expedited changes Spotlighting poor planning and reducing the need for this category going forward (“The Hall of Shame”)
    CAB approval rate Change coordinator alignment with CAB priorities – low approval rate indicates need to tighten gatekeeping by the change coordinator
    Calendar of changes Planning

    4.1.2 Determine Metrics, Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), and Critical Success Factors (CSFs)

    Input

    • Current metrics

    Output

    • List of trackable metrics, KPIs and CSFs

    Materials

    Participants

    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Operations (optional)
    1. Draw three tables for metrics, KPIs, and CSFs.
    2. Starting with the CSF table, fill in all relevant CSFs that your group wishes to track and measure.
    3. Next, work to determine relevant KPIs correlated with the CSFs and metrics needed to measure the KPIs. Use the tables included below (taken from section 14 of the Change Management SOP) to guide the process.
    4. Record the results in the tables in section 14 of your Change Management SOP.
    5. Decide on where and when to review the metrics to discuss your change management strategy. Designate and owner and record in the RACI and Communications section of your Change Management SOP.
    Ref #Metric

    M1

    Number of changes implemented for a time period
    M2 Number of changes successfully implemented for a time period
    M3 Number of changes implemented causing incidents
    M4 Number of accepted known errors when change is implemented
    M5 Total days for a change build (specific to each change)
    M6 Number of changes rescheduled
    M7 Number of training questions received following a change
    Ref#KPIProduct
    K1 Successful changes for a period of time (approach 100%) M2 / M1 x 100%
    K2 Changes causing incidents (approach 0%) M3 / M1 x 100%
    K3 Average days to implement a change ΣM5 / M1
    K4 Change efficiency (approach 100%) [1 - (M6 / M1)] x 100%
    K5 Quality of changes being implemented (approach 100%) [1 - (M4 / M1)] x 100%
    K6 Change training efficiency (approach 100%) [1 - (M7 / M1)] x 100%
    Ref#CSFIndicator
    C1 Successful change management process producing quality changes K1, K5
    C2 Consistent efficient change process K4, K6
    C3 Change process maps to business needs K5, K6

    Measure changes in selected metrics to evaluate success

    Once you have implemented a standardized change management practice, your team’s goal should be to improve the process, year over year.

    • After a process change has been implemented, it’s important to regularly monitor and evaluate the CSFs, KPIs, and metrics you chose to evaluate. Examine whether the process change you implemented has actually resolved the issue or achieved the goal of the critical success factor.
    • Establish a schedule for regularly reviewing the key metrics. Assess changes in those metrics and determine progress toward reaching objectives.
    • In addition to reviewing CSFs, KPIs, and metrics, check in with the release management team and end users to measure their perceptions of the change management process once an appropriate amount of time has passed.
    • Ensure that metrics are telling the whole story and that reporting is honest in order to be informative.

    Outcomes of standardizing change management should include:

    1. Improved efficiency, effectiveness, and quality of changes.
    2. Changes and processes are more aligned with the business needs and strategy.
    3. Improved maturity of change processes.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Make sure you’re measuring the right things and considering all sources of information. It’s very easy to put yourself in a position where you’re congratulating yourselves for improving on a specific metric such as number of releases per month, but satisfaction remains low.

    4.1.3 Track and Record Metrics Using the Change Management Metrics Tool

    Input

    • Current metrics

    Output

    • List of trackable metrics, KPIs and CSFs to be observed over the length of a year

    Materials

    Participants

    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Operations (optional)

    Tracking the progress of metrics is paramount to the success of any change management process. Use Info-Tech’s Change Management Metrics Tool to record metrics and track your progress. This tool is intended to be a substitute for organizations who do not have the capability to track change-related metrics in their ITSM tool.

    1. Input metrics from the previous activity to track over the course of a year.
    2. To record your metrics, open the tool and go to tab 2. The tool is currently primed to record and track five metrics. If you need more than that, you can edit the list in the hidden calculations tab.
    3. To see the progress of your metrics, move to tab 3 to view a dashboard of all metrics in the tool.

    Download the Change Management Metrics Tool

    Case Study

    A federal credit union was able to track maturity growth through the proper use of metrics.

    Industry: Federal Credit Union (anonymous)

    Source: Info-Tech Workshop

    Challenge

    At this federal credit union, the VP of IT wanted a tight set of metrics to engage with the business, communicate within IT, enable performance management of staff, and provide visibility into workload demands, among other requirements.

    The organization was suffering from “metrics fatigue,” with multiple reports being generated from all groups within IT, to the point that weekly/monthly reports were being seen as spam.

    Solution

    Stakeholders were provided with an overview of change management benefits and were asked to identify one key attribute that would be useful to their specific needs.

    Metrics were designed around the stakeholder needs, piloted with each stakeholder group, fine-tuned, and rolled out.

    Some metrics could not be automated off-the-shelf and were rolled out in a manual fashion. These metrics were subsequently automated and finally made available through a dashboard.

    Results

    The business received clear guidance regarding estimated times to implement changes across different elements of the environment.

    The IT managers were able to plan team workloads with visibility into upstream change activity.

    Architects were able to identify vendors and systems that were the leading source of instability.

    The VP of IT was able to track the maturity growth of the change management process and proactively engage with the business on identified hot spots.

    Step 4.2

    Implement the Project

    Activities

    4.2.1 Use a Communications Plan to Gain End User Buy-In

    4.2.2 Create a Project Roadmap to Track Your Implementation Progress

    Measure, Manage, and Maintain

    Step 4.1: Identify Metrics and Build the Change Calendar

    Step 3.2: Implement the Project

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO/IT Director
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager

    Outcomes of this step

    • A communications plan for key messages to communicate to relevant stakeholders and audiences
    • A roadmap with assigned action items to implement change management

    Success of the new process will depend on introducing change and gaining acceptance

    Change management provides value by promptly evaluating and delivering changes required by the business and by minimizing disruption and rework caused by failed changes. Communication of your new change management process is key. If people do not understand the what and why, it will fail to provide the desired value.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Gather feedback from end users about the new process: if the process is too bureaucratic, end users are more likely to circumvent it.

    Main Challenges with Communication

    • Many people fail before they even start because they are buried in a mess created before they arrived – either because of a failed attempt to get change management implemented or due to a complicated system that has always existed.
    • Many systems are maintained because “that’s the way it’s always been done.”
    • Organizations don’t know where to start; they think change management is too complex a process.
    • Each group needs to follow the same procedure – groups often have their own processes, but if they don’t agree with one another, this could cause an outage.

    Educate affected stakeholders to prepare for organizational change

    An organizational change management plan should be part of your change management project.

    • Educate stakeholders about:
      • The process change (describe it in a way that the user can understand and is clear and concise).
        • IT changes will be handled in a standardized and repeatable fashion to minimize change-related incidents.
      • Who is impacted?
        • All users.
      • How are they impacted?
        • All change requests will be made using a standard form and will not be deployed until formal approval is received.
      • Change messaging.
        • How to communicate the change (benefits).
      • Learning and development – training your users on the change.
        • Develop and deliver training session on the Change Management SOP to familiarize users with this new method of handling IT change.

    Host a lunch-and-learn session

    • For the initial deployment, host a lunch-and-learn session to educate the business on the change management practice. Relevant stakeholders of affected departments should host it and cover the following topics:
    • What is change management (change management/change control)?
    • The value of change management.
    • What the Change Management SOP looks like.
    • Who is involved in the change management process (the CAB, etc.)?
    • What constitutes a pre-approved change and an emergency change?
    • An overview of the process, including how to avoid unauthorized changes.
    • Who should they contact in case of questions?

    Communicate the new process to all affected stakeholders

    Do not surprise users or support staff with changes. This will result in lost productivity and low satisfaction with IT services.

    • User groups and the business need to be given sufficient notice of an impending change.
    • This will allow them to make appropriate plans to accept the change, minimizing the impact of the change on productivity.
    • A communications plan will be documented in the RFC while the release is being built and tested.
    • It’s the responsibility of the change team to execute on the communications plan.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The success of change communication can be measured by monitoring the number of service desk tickets related to a change that was not communicated to users.

    Communication is crucial to the integration and overall implementation of your change management initiative. An effective communications plan will:

    • Gain support from management at the project proposal phase.
    • Create end-user buy-in once the program is set to launch.
    • Maintain the presence of the program throughout the business.
    • Instill ownership throughout the business from top-level management to new hires.

    Create your communications plan to anticipate challenges, remove obstacles, and ensure buy-in

    Management

    Technicians

    Business Stakeholders

    Provide separate communications to key stakeholder groups

    Why? What problems are you trying to solve?

    What? What processes will it affect (that will affect me)?

    Who? Who will be affected? Who do I go to if I have issues with the new process?

    When? When will this be happening? When will it affect me?

    How? How will these changes manifest themselves?

    Goal? What is the final goal? How will it benefit me?

    Info-Tech Insight

    Pay close attention to the medium of communication. For example, stakeholders on their feet all day would not be as receptive to an email communication compared to those who primarily work in front of a computer. Put yourself into various stakeholders’ shoes to craft a tailored communication of change management.

    4.2.1 Use a Communications Plan to Gain End User Buy-In

    Input

    • List of stakeholder groups for change management

    Output

    • Tailored communications plans for various stakeholder groups

    Materials

    Participants

    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Operations (optional)
    1. Using Info-Tech’s Change Management Communications Plan, identify key audiences or stakeholder groups that will be affected by the new change management practice.
    2. For each group requiring a communications plan, identify the following:
      • The benefits for that group of individuals.
      • The impact the change will have on them.
      • The best communication method(s) for them.
      • The time frame of the communication.
    3. Complete this information in a table like the one below:
    GroupBenefitsImpactMethodTimeline
    IT Standardized change process All changes must be reviewed and approved Poster campaign 6 months
    End Users Decreased wait time for changes Formal process for RFCs Lunch-and-learn sessions 3 months
    Business Reduced outages Increased involvement in planning and approvals Monthly reports 1 year
    1. Discuss the communications plan:
      • Will this plan ensure that users are given adequate opportunities to accept the changes being deployed?
      • Is the message appropriate for each audience? Is the format appropriate for each audience?
      • Does the communication include training where necessary to help users adopt any new functions/workflows being introduced?

    Download the Change Management Communications Plan

    Present your SOP to key stakeholders and obtain their approval

    Now that you have completed your Change Management SOP, the final step is to get sign-off from senior management to begin the rollout process.

    Know your audience:

    • Determine the service management stakeholders who will be included in the audience for your presentation.
    • You want your presentation to be succinct and hard hitting. Management’s time is tight and they will lose interest if you drag out the delivery.
    • Briefly speak about the need for more formal change management and emphasize the benefits of implementing a more formal process with a SOP.
    • Present your current state assessment results to provide context before presenting the SOP itself.
    • As with any other foundational activity, be prepared with some quick wins to gain executive attention.
    • Be prepared to review with both technical and less technical stakeholders.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The support of senior executive stakeholders is critical to the success of your SOP rollout. Try to wow them with project benefits and make sure they know about the risks/pain points.

    Download the Change Management Project Summary Template

    4.2.2 Create a Project Roadmap to Track Your Implementation Progress

    Input

    • List of implementation tasks

    Output

    • Roadmap and timeline for change management implementation

    Materials

    Participants

    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Operations (optional)
    1. Info-Tech’s Change Management Roadmap Tool helps you identify and prioritize tasks that need to be completed for the change management implementation project.
    2. Use this tool to identify each action item that will need to be completed as part of the change management initiative. Chart each action item, assign an owner, define the duration, and set a completion date.
    3. Use the resulting rocket diagram as a guide to task completion as you work toward your future state.

    Download the Change Management Roadmap Tool

    Case Study (part 4 of 4)

    Intel implemented a robust change management process.

    Industry: Technology

    Source: Daniel Grove, Intel

    Challenge

    Founded in 1968, the world’s largest microchip and semiconductor company employs over 100,000 people. Intel manufactures processors for major players in the PC market including Apple, Lenovo, HP, and Dell.

    Intel IT supports over 65,000 servers, 3.2 petabytes of data, over 70,000 PCs, and 2.6 million emails per day.

    Intel’s change management program is responsible for over 4,000 changes each week.

    Solution

    Intel had its new change management program in place and the early milestones planned, but one key challenge with any new project is communication.

    The company also needed to navigate the simplification of a previously complex process; end users could be familiar with any of the 37 different change processes or 25 different change management systems of record.

    Top-level buy-in was another concern.

    Results

    Intel first communicated the process changes by publishing the vision and strategy for the project with top management sponsorship.

    The CIO published all of the new change policies, which were supported by the Change Governance Council.

    Intel cited the reason for success as the designation of a Policy and Guidance Council – a group designed to own communication and enforcement of the new policies and processes put in place.

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Problem Solved

    You now have an outline of your new change management process. The hard work starts now for an effective implementation. Make use of the communications plan to socialize the new process with stakeholders and the roadmap to stay on track.

    Remember as you are starting your implementation to keep your documents flexible and treat them as “living documents.” You will likely need to tweak and refine the processware and templates several times to continually improve the process. Furthermore, don’t shy away from seeking feedback from your stakeholders to gain buy-in.

    Lastly, keep an eye on your progress with objective, data-driven metrics. Leverage the trends in your data to drive your decisions. Be sure to revisit the maturity assessment not only to measure and visualize your progress, but to gain insight into your next steps.

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

    Contact your account representative for more information.

    workshops@infotech.com

    1-888-670-8889

    Additional Support

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

    To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.

    Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic office in Toronto, Ontario, Canada to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.

    Contact your account representative for more information.

    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    1.1.2 Complete a Change Management Maturity Assessment

    Run through the change management maturity assessment with tailored commentary for each action item outlining context and best practices.

    2.2.1 Plot the Process for a Normal Change

    Build a normal change process using Info-Tech’s Change Management Process Library template with an analyst helping you to right size the process for your organization.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Standardize the Service Desk

    Improve customer service by driving consistency in your support approach and meeting SLAs.

    Stabilize Release and Deployment Management

    Maintain both speed and control while improving the quality of deployments and releases within the infrastructure team.

    Incident and Problem Management

    Don’t let persistent problems govern your department.

    Select Bibliography

    AXELOS Limited. ITIL Foundation: ITIL 4th edition. TSO, 2019, pp. 118–120.

    Behr, Kevin and George Spafford. The Visible Ops Handbook: Implementing ITIL in 4 Practical and Auditable Steps. IT Revolution Press. 2013.

    BMC. “ITIL Change Management.” BMC Software Canada, 22 December 2016.

    Brown, Vance. “Change Management: The Greatest ROI of ITIL.” Cherwell Service Management.

    Cisco. “Change Management: Best Practices.” Cisco, 10 March 2008.

    Grove, Daniel. “Case Study ITIL Change Management Intel Corporation.” PowerShow, 2005.

    ISACA. “COBIT 5: Enabling Processes.” ISACA, 2012.

    Jantti, M. and M. Kainulainen. “Exploring an IT Service Change Management Process: A Case Study.” ICDS 2011: The Fifth International Conference on Digital Society, 23 Feb. 2011.

    Murphy, Vawns. “How to Assess Changes.” The ITSM Review, 29 Jan. 2016.

    Nyo, Isabel. “Best Practices for Change Management in the Age of DevOps.” Atlassian Engineering, 12 May 2021.

    Phillips, Katherine W., Katie A. Liljenquist, and Margaret A. Neale. “Better Decisions Through Diversity.” Kellogg Insight, 1 Oct. 2010.

    Pink Elephant. “Best Practices for Change Management.” Pink Elephant, 2005.

    Sharwood, Simon. “Google broke its own cloud by doing two updates at once.” The Register, 24 Aug. 2016.

    SolarWinds. “How to Eliminate the No: 1 Cause of Network Downtime.” SolarWinds Tech Tips, 25 Apr. 2014.

    The Stationery Office. “ITIL Service Transition: 2011.” The Stationary Office, 29 July 2011.

    UCISA. “ITIL – A Guide to Change Management.” UCISA.

    Zander, Jason. “Final Root Cause Analysis and Improvement Areas: Nov 18 Azure Storage Service Interruption.” Microsoft Azure: Blog and Updates, 17 Dec. 2014.

    Appendix I: Expedited Changes

    Employ the expedited change to promote process adherence

    In many organizations, there are changes which may not fit into the three prescribed categories. The reason behind why the expedited category may be needed generally falls between two possibilities:

    1. External drivers dictate changes via mandates which may not fall within the normal change cycle. A CIO, judge, state/provincial mandate, or request from shared services pushes a change that does not fall within a normal change cycle. However, there is no imminent outage (therefore it is not an emergency). In this case, an expedited change can proceed. Communicate to the change requester that IT and the change build team will still do their best to implement the change without issue, but any extra risk of implementing this expedited change (compared to an normal change) will be absorbed by the change requester.
    2. The change requester did not prepare for the change adequately. This is common if a new change process is being established (and stakeholders are still adapting to the process). Change requesters or the change build team may request the change to be done by a certain date that does not fall within the normal change cycle, or they simply did not give the CAB enough time to vet the change. In this case, you may use the expedited category as a metric (or a “Hall of Shame” example). If you identify a department or individual that frequently request expedited changes, use the expedited category as a means to educate them about the normal change to discourage the behavior moving forward.

    Two possible ways to build an expedited change category”

    1. Build the category similar to an emergency change. In this case, one difference would be the time allotted to fully obtain authorization of the change from the E-CAB and business owner before implementing the change (as opposed to the emergency change workflow).
    2. Have the expedited change reflect the normal change workflow. In this case, all the same steps of the normal change workflow are followed except for expedited timelines between processes. This may include holding an impromptu CAB meeting to authorize the change.

    Example process: Expedited Change Process

    The image is a flowchart, showing the process for Expedited Change.

    For the full process, refer to the Change Management Process Library.

    Appendix II: Optimize IT Change Management in a DevOps Environment

    Change Management cannot be ignored because you are DevOps or Agile

    But it can be right-sized.

    The core tenets of change management still apply no matter the type of development environment an organization has. Changes in any environment carry risk of degrading functionality, and must therefore be vetted. However, the amount of work and rigor put into different stages of the change life cycle can be altered depending on the maturity of the development workflows. The following are several stage gates for change management that MUST be considered if you are a DevOps or Agile shop:

    • Intake assessment (separation of changes from projects, service requests, operational tasks)
      • Within a DevOps or Agile environment, many of the application changes will come directly from the SDLC and projects going live. It does not mean a change must go through CAB, but leveraging the pre-approved category allows for an organization to stick to development lifecycles without being heavily bogged down by change bureaucracy.
    • Technical review
      • Leveraging automation, release contingencies, and the current SDLC documentation to decrease change risk allows for various changes to be designated as pre-approved.
    • Authorization
      • Define the authorization and dependencies of a change early in the lifecycle to gain authorization and necessary signoffs.
    • Documentation/communication
      • Documentation and communication are post-implementation activities that cannot be ignored. If documentation is required throughout the SDLC, then design the RFC to point to the correct documentation instead of duplicating information.

    "Understand that process is hard and finding a solution that fits every need can be tricky. With this change management process we do not try to solve every corner case so much as create a framework by which best judgement can be used to ensure maximum availability of our platforms and services while still complying with our regulatory requirements and making positive changes that will delight our customers.“ -IT Director, Information Cybersecurity Organization

    Five principals for implementing change in DevOps

    Follow these best practices to make sure your requirements are solid:

    People

    The core differences between an Agile or DevOps transition and a traditional approach are the restructuring and the team behind it. As a result, the stakeholders of change management must be onboard for the process to work. This is the most difficult problem to solve if it’s an issue, but open avenues of feedback for a process build is a start.

    DevOps Lifecycles

    • Plan the dev lifecycle so people can’t skirt it. Ensure the process has automated checks so that it’s more work to skirt the system than it is to follow it. Make the right process the process of least resistance.
    • Plan changes from the start to ensure that cross-dependencies are identified early and that the proposed implementation date is deconflicted and visible to other change requesters and change stakeholders.

    Automation

    Automation comes in many forms and is well documented in many development workflows. Having automated signoffs for QA/security checks and stakeholders/cross dependency owner sign offs may not fully replace the CAB but can ease the burden on discussions before implementation.

    Contingencies

    Canary releases, phased releases, dark releases, and toggles are all options you can employ to reduce risk during a release. Furthermore, building in contingencies to the test/rollback plan decreases the risk of the change by decreasing the factor of likelihood.

    Continually Improve

    Building change from the ground up doesn’t meant the process has to be fully fledged before launch. Iterative improvements are possible before achieving an optimal state. Having the proper metrics on the pain points and bottlenecks in the process can identify areas for automation and improvement.

    Increasing the proportion of pre-approved changes

    Leverage the traditional change infrastructure to deploy changes quickly while keeping your risk low.

    • To designate a change as a pre-approved change it must have a low risk rating (based on impact and likelihood). Fortunately, many of the changes within the Agile framework are designed to be small and lower risk (at least within application development). Putting in the work ahead of time to document these changes, template RFCs, and document the dependencies for various changes allows for a shift in the proportion of pre-approved changes.
    • The designation of pre-approved changes is an ongoing process. This is not an overnight initiative. Measure the proportion of changes by category as a metric, setting goals and interim goals to shift the change proportion to a desired ratio.

    The image is a bar graph, with each bar having 3 colour-coded sections: Emergency, Normal, and Pre-Approved. The first bar is before, where the largest change category is Normal. The second bar is after, and the largest change category is Pre-Approved.

    Turn your CAB into a virtual one

    • The CAB does not have to fully disappear in a DevOps environment. If the SDLC is built in a way that authorizes changes through peer reviews and automated checks, by the time it’s deployed, the job of the CAB should have already been completed. Then the authorization stage-gate (traditionally, the CAB) shifts to earlier in the process, reducing the need for an actual CAB meeting. However, the change must still be communicated and documented, even if it’s a pre-approved change.
    • As the proportion of changes shifts from a high degree of normal changes to a high degree of pre-approved changes, the need for CAB meetings should decrease even further. As an end-state, you may reserve actual CAB meetings for high-profile changes (as defined by risk).
    • Lastly, change management does not disappear as a process. Periodic reviews of change management metrics and the pre-approved change list must still be completed.

    Ransomware Cyber Attack. The real Disaster Recovery Scenario

    Cyber-ransomware criminals need to make sure that you cannot simply recover your encrypted data via your backups. They must make it look like paying is your only option. And if you do not have a strategy that takes this into account, unfortunately, you may be up the creek without a paddle. because how do they make their case? Bylooking for ways to infect your backups, way before you find out you have been compromised. 

    That means your standard disaster recovery scenarios provide insufficient protection against this type of event. You need to think beyond DRP and give consideration to what John Beattie and Michael Shandrowski call "Cyber Incident Recovery Risk management" (CIR-RM).  

    incident, incident management, cybersecurity, cyber, disaster recovery, drp, business continuity, bcm, recovery

    Register to read more …

    The Resilience Pack

    The Resilience Pack

    All items you need to become resilient.

    Resilience results from a clear set of governance, mindset, attitudes and actions.

    If you have not yet read "What is resilience?" I can recommend it. This pack contains the elements to start your resilience journey.

    Contact us to get started

    With this pack, we give you the right direction to become resilient. Please contact us to discuss the options.
    Tymans Group also offers consulting, as well as an extension to EU DORA compliance. 

    Continue reading

    Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}508|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Application Development
    • Parent Category Link: /application-development
    • You have identified that a change to your sourcing strategy is required, based on market and company factors.
    • You are ready to select a new sourcing partner to drive innovation, time to market, increased quality, and improved financial performance.
    • Taking on a new partner is a significant investment and risk, and you must get it right the first time.
    • You need to make a change now to prevent losing clients and falling further behind your performance targets and your market.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Selecting a sourcing partner is a function of matching complex factors to your own firm. It is not a simple RFP exercise; it requires significant introspection, proactive planning, and in-depth investigation of potential partners to choose the right fit.

    Impact and Result

    Choosing the right sourcing partner is a four-step process:

    1. Assess your companies' skills and processes in the key areas of risk to sourcing initiatives.
    2. Based on the current situation, define a profile for the matching sourcing partner.
    3. Seek matching partners from the market, either in terms of vendor partners or in terms of sourcing locations.
    4. Based on the choice of partner, build a plan to implement the partnership, define metrics to measure success, and a process to monitor.

    Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Storyboard – Use this presentation to select a partner to best fit your sourcing needs and deliver long-term value.

    This project helps select a partner for sourcing of your development team so that you can realize the benefits from changing your sourcing strategy.

    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Storyboard

    2. Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation Template – Use this template to build a presentation to detail your decision on a sourcing partner for your development team.

    This presentation template is designed to capture the results from the exercises within the storyboard and allow users to build a presentation to leadership showing how selection was done.

    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation Template

    3. Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation Example – Use this as a completed example of the template.

    This presentation template portrays what the completed template looks like by showing sample data in all tables. It allows members to see how each exercise leads to the final selection of a partner.

    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Example Template
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Application Development Team

    Choose the right partner to enable your firm to maximize the value realized from your sourcing strategy.

    Analyst Perspective

    Selecting the right partner for your sourcing needs is no longer a cost-based exercise. Driving long-term value comes from selecting the partner who best matches your firm on a wide swath of factors and fits your needs like a glove.

    Sourcing in the past dealt with a different kind of conversation involving two key questions:

    Where will the work be done?

    How much will it cost?

    How people think about sourcing has changed significantly. People are focused on gaining a partner, and not just a vendor to execute a single transaction. They will add skills your team lacks, and an ability to adapt to your changing needs, all while ensuring you operate within any constraints based on your business.

    Selecting a sourcing partner is a matching exercise that requires you to look deep into yourself, understand key factors about your firm, and then seek the partner who best meets your profile.

    The image contains a picture of Dr. Suneel Ghei.

    Dr. Suneel Ghei
    Principal Research Director, Application Development
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    Common Obstacles

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    • You have identified that a change to your sourcing strategy is required based on market and company factors.
    • You are ready to select a new sourcing partner to drive innovation, time to market, increased quality, and improve financial performance.
    • Taking on a new partner is a significant investment and risk, and you must get it right the first time.
    • You need to make a change now to avoid falling further behind your performance targets and your market, and losing clients.

    Almost half of all sourcing initiatives do not realize the projected savings, and the biggest reason is the choice of partner.

    The market for Application Development partners has become more diverse, increasing choice and the risk of making a costly mistake by choosing the wrong partner.

    Firms struggle with how best to support the sourcing partner and allocate resources with the right skills to maximize success, increasing the cost and time to implement, and limiting benefits.

    Making the wrong choice means inferior products, and higher costs and losing both clients and reputation.

    • Choosing the right sourcing partner is a four-step process:
    1. Assess your company's skills and processes in the key areas of risk to sourcing initiatives.
    2. Based on the current situation, define a profile for the matching sourcing partner.
    3. Seek matching partners from the market, either in terms of vendor partners or in terms of sourcing locations.
    4. Based on your choice of partner, build a plan to implement the partnership, and define metrics to measure success and a process to monitor.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Successfully selecting a sourcing partner is not a simple RFP exercise to choose the lowest cost. It is a complex process of introspection, detailed examination of partners and locations, and matching the fit. It requires you to seek a partner that is the Yin to your Yang, and failure is not an option.

    You need a new source for development resources

    You are facing immediate challenges that require a new approach to development resourcing.

    • Your firm is under fire; you are facing pressures financially from clients and your competitors.
    • Your pace of innovation and talent sourcing is too slow and too limiting.
    • Your competition is moving faster and your clients are considering their options.
    • Revenues and costs of development are trending in the wrong direction.
    • You need to act now to avoid spiraling further.

    Given how critical our applications are to the business and our clients, there is no room for error in choosing our partner.

    A study of 121 firms outsourcing various processes found that 50% of those surveyed saw no gains from the outsourcing arrangement, so it is critical to make the right choice the first time.

    Source: Zhang et al

    Big challenges await you on the journey

    The road to improving sourcing has many potholes.

    • In a study of 121 firms who moved development offshore, almost 50% of all outsourcing and offshoring initiatives do not achieve the desired results.
    • In another study focused on large corporations, it was shown that 70% of respondents saw negative outcomes from offshoring development.
    • Globalization of IT Services and the ability to work from anywhere have contributed to a significant increase in the number of development firms to choose from.
    • Choosing and implementing a new partner is costly, and the cost of choosing the wrong partner and then trying to correct your course is significant in dollars and reputation:
      • Costs to find a new partner and transition
      • Lost revenue due to product issues
      • Loss of brand and reputation due to poor choice
    • The wrong choice can also cost you in terms of your own resources, increasing the risk of losing more knowledge and skills.

    A survey of 25 large corporate firms that outsourced development offshore found that 70% of them had negative outcomes.

    (Source: University of Oregon Applied Information Management, 2019)

    Info-Tech’s approach

    Selecting the right partner is a matching exercise.

    Selecting the right partner is a complex exercise with many factors

    1. Look inward. Assess your culture, your skills, and your needs.
    • Market
    • People
    • Culture
    • Technical aspects
  • Create a profile for the perfect partner to fit your firm.
    • Sourcing Strategy
    • Priorities
    • Profile
  • Find the partner that best fits your needs
    • Define RFx
    • Target Partners
    • Evaluate
  • Implement the partner and put in metrics and process to manage.
    • Contract Partner
    • Develop Goals
    • Create Process and Metrics

    The Info-Tech difference:

    1. Assess your own organization’s characteristics and capabilities in four key areas.
    2. Based on these characteristics and the sourcing strategy you are seeking to implement, build a profile for your perfect partner.
    3. Define an RFx and assessment matrix to survey the market and select the best partner.
    4. Implement the partner with process and controls to manage the relationship, built collaboratively and in place day 1.

    Insight summary

    Overarching insight

    Successfully selecting a sourcing partner is not a simple RFP exercise to choose the lowest cost. It is a complex process of introspection, detailed examination of partners and locations, and matching the fit. It requires you to seek a partner that is the Yin to your Yang, and failure is not an option.

    Phase 1 insight

    Fitting each of these pieces to the right partner is key to building a long-term relationship of value.

    Selecting a partner requires you to look at your firm in depth from a business, technical, and organizational culture perspective.

    Phase 2 insight

    The factors we have defined serve to build us a profile for the ideal partner to engage in sourcing our development team. This profile will lead us to be able to define our RFP / RFI and assess respondents.

    Phase 3/4 insight

    Implement the relationship the same way you want it to work, as one team. Work together on contract mechanism, shared goals, metrics, and performance measurement. By making this transparent you hasten the development of a joint team, which will lead to long-term success.

    Tactical insight

    Ensure you assess not just where you are but where you are going, in choosing a partner. For example, you must consider future markets you might enter when choosing the right sourcing, or outsourcing location to maintain compliance.

    Tactical insight

    Sourcing is not a replacement for your full team. Skills must be maintained in house as well, so the partner must be willing to work with the in-house team to share knowledge and collaborate on deliverables.

    Addressing the myth – Single country offshoring or outsourcing

    Research shows that a multi-country approach has a higher chance of success.

    • Research shows that firms trying their own captive development centers fail 20% of the time. ( Journal of Information Technology, 2008)
    • Further, the overall cost of ownership for an offshore center has shown to be significantly higher than the cost of outsourcing, as the offshore center requires more internal management and leadership.
    • Research shows that offshoring requires the offshore location to also house business team members to allow key relationships to be built and ensure more access to expertise. (Arxiv, 2021)
    • Given the specificity of employment laws, cultural differences, and leadership needs, it is very beneficial to have a Corporate HR presence in countries where an offshore center is being set up. (Arxiv, 2021)
    • Lastly, given the changing climate on security, geopolitical changes, and economic factors, our research with service providers and corporate clients shows a need to have more diversity in provider location than a single center can provide.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Long-term success of sourcing requires more than a development center. It requires a location that houses business and HR staff to enable the new development team to learn and succeed.

    Addressing the myth – Outsourcing is a simple RFP for skills and lowest cost

    Success in outsourcing is an exercise in finding a match based on complex factors.

    • In the past, outsourcing was a simple RFP exercise to find the cheapest country with the skills.
    • Our research shows this is no longer true; the decision is now more complex.
    • Competition has driven costs higher, while time business integration and security constraints have served to limit the markets available.
    • Company culture fit is key to the ability to work as one team, which research shows is a key element in delivery of long-term value. (University of Oregon, 2019).
    • These are some of the many factors that need to be considered as you choose your outsourcing partner.
    • The right decision is to find the vendor that best matches the current state of your culture, meets your market constraints, and will allow for best integration to your team – it's not about cheapest or pure skills. (IEEE Access, 2020)

    Info-Tech Insight

    Finding the right outsourcing vendor is an exercise in knowing yourself and then finding the best match to align with your key traits. It's not just costs and skills, but the partner who best matches with your ability to mitigate the risks of outsourcing.

    Phase 1

    Look inward to gain insight on key factors

    Introspection

    1.1 Assess your market factors

    1.2 Determine your people factors

    1.3 Review your current culture

    1.4 Document your technical factors

    Profiling

    2.1 Recall your sourcing strategy

    2.2 Prioritize your company factors

    2.3 Create target profile

    Partner selection

    3.1 Review your RFx

    3.2 Identify target vendors

    3.3 Evaluate vendor

    responses

    Implementation

    4.1 Engage partner to choose contract mechanism

    4.2 Engage partner team to define goals

    4.3 Choose your success

    metrics

    This phase will walk you through assessing and documenting the key driving factors about your firm and the current situation.

    By defining these factors, you will be able to apply this information in the matching process to select the best fit in a partner.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    Line of Business leaders

    Technology leaders

    Key criteria to assess your firm

    Research shows firms must assess themselves in different areas.

    Market factors

    • Who are your clients and your competitors, and what legal constraints do you face?

    People / Process factors

    • What employee skills are you seeking, what is your maturity in product management and stakeholder engagement, and what languages are spoken most predominantly?

    Cultural factors

    • What is your culture around communications, collaboration, change management, and conflict resolution?

    Technical factors

    • What is your current / future technical platform, and what is the maturity of your applications?

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    When assessing these areas, consider where you are today and where you want to go tomorrow, as choosing a partner is a long-term endeavor.

    Step 1.1

    Assess your market factors

    Activities

    1.1.1 Review your client list and future projections to determine your market factors.

    1.1.2 Review your competitive analysis to determine your competitive factors

    This step involves the following participants:

    Business leaders

    Product Owners

    Technology leaders

    Outcomes of this step

    Details of key market factors that will drive the selection of the right partner.

    Market factors

    The Market has a lot to say about the best match for your application development partner.

    Research in the space has defined key market-based factors that are critical when selecting a partner.

    1. Market sectors you service or plan to service – This is critical, as many market sectors have constraints on where their data can be accessed or stored. These restrictions also change over time, so they must be consistently reviewed.
    • E.g. Canadian government data must be stored and only accessed in Canada.
    • E.g. US Government contracts require service providers to avoid certain countries.
  • Your competitors – Your competitors can often seize on differences and turn them to differentiators; for example, offshoring to certain countries can be played up as a risk by a competitor who does all their work in a particular country.
  • Your clients – Research shows that clients can have very distinct views on services being performed in certain countries due to perceived risk, culture, and geopolitical factors. Understanding the views of major clients on globalization of services is a key factor in maintaining client satisfaction.
  • Info-Tech Insight

    Understanding your current and future market factors ensure that your business can not only be successful with the chosen partner today, but also in the future.

    1.1.1 Assess your market factors

    30 min

    Market factors

    1. Group your current client list into three categories:
      1. Those that have no restrictions on data security, privacy or location.
      2. Those that ask for assurances on data security, privacy and location.
      3. Those clients who have compliance restrictions related to data security, privacy, and location.
    2. Categorize future markets into the same three categories.
    3. Based on revenue projections, estimate the revenue from each category as a percentage of your total revenue.

    Download the Select a Sourcing Partner Presentation Template

    Input Output
    • Current client list
    • Future market plans
    • Competitive analysis
    • Completion of the Market Factors chart in the Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team template
    Materials Participants
    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation template
    • Technology leaders
    • Product owners
    • Line of business leaders
    • Finance leaders

    Assess your market factors

    Market and sector

    Market share and constraints

    Market category

    Sector – Public, private or both

    Market share of category

    Key areas of concern

    Not constrained by data privacy, security or location

    Private

    50%

    Require assurances on data security, privacy or location

    Public

    45%

    Data access

    Have constraints that preclude choices related to data security, privacy and location

    Public

    5%

    Data residency

    1.1.2 Review your competitive factors

    30 min

    Competitive factors

    1. List your largest competitors.
    2. Document their sourcing strategies for their development team – are they all onshore or nearshore? Do they outsource?
    3. Based on this, identify competitive threats based on changing sourcing strategies.

    Download the Select a Sourcing Partner Presentation Template

    Input Output
    • Current client list
    • Future market plans
    • Competitive analysis
    • Completion of the Market Factors chart in the Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team template
    Materials Participants
    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation template
    • Technology leaders
    • Product owners
    • Line of business leaders
    • Finance leaders

    Review your competitive factors

    Competitors

    Competitor sourcing strategy

    Competitive threats

    Competitor

    Where is the market?

    Is this onshore / near shore / offshore?

    Data residency

    How could competitors take advantage of a change in our sourcing strategy?

    Competitor X

    Canada / US

    All work done in house and onshore

    Kept in Canada / US

    If we source offshore, we will face a Made in Canada / US threat

    Step 1.2

    Consider your people-related factors

    Activities

    1.2.1 Define your people factors

    1.2.2 Assess your process factors

    This step involves the following participants:

    Technical leaders

    Outcomes of this step

    Details of key people factors that will drive the selection of the right partner.

    People / process factors

    People and process have a large hand in the success or failure of a partner relationship.

    • Alignment of people and process are critical to the success of the partner relationship over the long term.
    • In research on outsourcing / offshoring, Rahman et al identified ten factors that directly impact success or failure in offshoring or outsourcing of development.
    • Key among them are the following:
      • Employee skills
      • Project management
      • Maturity of process concerning product and client management
      • Language barrier

    Info-Tech Insight

    People are a critical resource in any sourcing strategy. Making sure the people and the processes will mesh seamlessly is how to ensure success.

    1.2.1 Define your people factors

    30 min

    Skills Inventory

    1. List skills needed in the development team to service current needs.
    2. Based on future innovation and product direction, add skills you foresee needing in the next 12-24 months. Where do you see a new technology platform (e.g. move from .NET to Java) or innovation (addition of Mobile)?
    3. List current skills present in the team.
    4. Identify skills gaps.

    Download the Select a Sourcing Partner Presentation Template

    InputOutput
    • Product plans for current and future products
    • Technology platform plans for current products
    • Future innovation plans
    • People- and process-related factors that influence sourcing decisions
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation template
    • Technology leaders
    • Product owners
    • Solution architects

    Assess your people - Skills inventory

    Skills required

    Strategic value

    Skills present

    Skill you are seeking

    Required today or in the future

    Rate the skill level required in this area

    Is this a strategic focus for the firm for future targets?

    Is this skill present in the team today?

    Rate current skill level (H/M/L)

    Java Development

    Future

    High

    Yes

    No

    Low

    .Net Development

    Today

    Med

    No

    Yes

    High

    1.2.2 Assess your process factors

    30 min

    Process factors

    1. Do you have a defined product ownership practice?
    2. How mature is the product ownership for the product you are seeking to change sourcing for (H/M/L)?
    3. Do you have project management principles and governance in place for software releases?
    4. What is the relative maturity / skill in the areas you are seeking sourcing for (H/M/L)?

    Download the Select a Sourcing Partner Presentation Template

    InputOutput
    • Product plans for current and future products
    • Technology platform plans for current products
    • Future innovation plans
    • People- and process-related factors that influence sourcing decisions
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation template
    • Technology leaders
    • Product owners
    • Solution architects

    Assess your process factors

    Product ownership

    Project management

    Product where sourcing is being changed

    Product ownership in place?

    Skills / maturity rating (H/M/L)

    Project management / governance in place for software releases

    Rate current maturity / skill level (H/M/L)

    ABC

    Yes

    High

    Yes

    High

    SQW

    No

    Low

    Yes

    High

    Step 1.3

    Review your current culture

    Activities

    1.3.1 Assess your communications factors

    1.3.2 Assess your conflict resolution factors

    This step involves the following participants:

    Technical leaders

    Product owners

    Project managers

    Outcomes of this step

    Details of key culture factors that will drive the selection of the right partner.

    Cultural factors

    Organization culture fit is a driver of collaboration between the teams, which drives success.

    • In their study of country attractiveness for sourcing development, Kotlarsky and Oshri point to the ability of the client and their sourcing partner to work as one team as a key to success.
    • This requires synergies in many cultural factors to avoid costly miscommunications and misinterpretations that damage collaboration.
    • Key factors in achieving this are:
      • Communications methodology and frequency; managing and communicating to the teams as one team vs two, and communicating at all levels, vs top down.
      • Managing the team as one integrated team, with collaboration enabled between all resources, rather than the more adversarial client vs partner approach.
      • Conflict resolution strategies must align so all members of the extended team work together to resolve conflict vs the traditional “Blame the Contractors”.
      • Strong change management is required to keep all team members aligned.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Synergy of culture is what enables a good partner selection to become a long-term relationship of value.

    1.3.1 Assess your communications factors

    30 min

    1. List all the methods you use to communicate with your development team – face to face, email, conference call, written.
    2. For each form of communication confirm frequency, medium, and audience (team vs one-on-one)
    3. Confirm if these communications take into account External vs Internal resources and different time zones, languages, and cultures.
    4. Is your development team broken up into teams by function, by location, by skill, etc., or do you operate as one team?

    Download the Select a Sourcing Partner Presentation Template

    Input Output
    • Communication process with existing development team
    • Examples of how external staff have been integrated into the process
    • Examples of conflicts and how they were resolved
    • Documentation of key cultural characteristics that need to be part of provider profiling
    Materials Participants
    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation template
    • Technology leaders
    • Product owners
    • Project managers

    Assess your communications strategy

    Communications

    Type

    Frequency

    Audience

    One communication or one per audience?

    Level of two-way dialogue

    Face-to-face team meetings

    Weekly

    All developers

    One

    High

    Daily standup

    Daily

    Per team

    One per audience

    Low

    1.3.2 Assess your conflict resolution factors

    30 min

    1. How does your organization handle the following types of conflict? Rate from 1-5, with 1 being hierarchical and 5 being openly collaborative.
      1. Developers on a team disagree.
      2. Development team disagrees with manager.
      3. Development team disagrees with product owner.
      4. Development team disagrees with line of business.
    2. Rate each conflict resolution strategy based on effectiveness.
    3. Confirm if this type of strategy is used for internal and external resources, or internal only.

    Download the Select a Sourcing Partner Presentation Template

    InputOutput
    • Communication process with existing development team
    • Examples of how external staff have been integrated into the process
    • Examples of conflicts and how they were resolved
    • Documentation of key cultural characteristics that need to be part of provider profiling
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation template
    • Technology leaders
    • Product owners
    • Project managers

    Assess your conflict resolution strategy

    Conflict

    Resolution strategy

    Effectiveness

    Audience

    Conflict type

    Rate the resolution strategy from hierarchical to collaborative (1-5)

    How effective is this method of resolution from 1-5?

    Is this strategy used for external parties as well as internal?

    Developer to product owner

    44

    Yes

    Developer to manager

    12

    Yes

    Step 1.4

    Document your technical factors

    Activities

    1.4.1 Document your product / platform factors

    1.4.2 Document your environment details

    This step involves the following participants:

    Technical leaders

    Product owners

    Outcomes of this step

    Details of key technical factors that will drive the selection of the right partner.

    Technical factors

    Technical factors are still the foundation for a Development sourcing relationship.

    • While there are many organizational factors to consider, the matching of technological factors is still the root on which the sourcing relationship is built; the end goal is to build better software.
    • Key technical Items that need to be aligned based on the research are:
      • Technical infrastructure
      • Development environments
      • Development methodology and tools
      • Deployment methodology and tools
      • Lack of/poor-quality technical documentation
    • Most RFPs focus purely on skills, but without alignment on the above items, work becomes impossible to move forward quickly, limiting the chances of success.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Technical factors are the glue that enables teams to function together. Ensuring that they are fully integrated is what enables team integration; seams in that integration represent failure points.

    1.4.1 Document your product / platform factors

    30 mins

    1. How many environments does each software release go through from the start of development through release to production?
    2. What is the infrastructure and development platform?

    Download the Select a Sourcing Partner Presentation Template

    InputOutput
    • Development process
    • Deployment process
    • Operations process
    • IT security policies
    • Documentation of key technical characteristics that need to be part of provider profiling
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation template
    • Development leaders
    • Deployment team leaders
    • Infrastructure leaders
    • IT operations leaders
    • Product owners
    • Project managers

    Document your product / platform

    Product / Platform

    Product you are seeking a sourcing solution for

    What is the current infrastructure platform?

    How many environments does the product pass through?

    What is the current development toolset?

    ABC

    Windows

    Dev – QA – Preprod - Prod

    .Net / Visual Studio

    1.4.2 Document your environment details

    30 min

    For each environment detail the following:

    1. Environment on premises or in cloud
    2. Access allowed to external parties
    3. Production data present and unmasked
    4. Deployment process: automated or manual
    5. Tools used for automated deployment
    6. Can the environment be restored to last known state automatically?
    7. Does documentation exist on the environment, processes and procedures?

    Download the Select a Sourcing Partner Presentation Template

    InputOutput
    • Development process
    • Deployment process
    • Operations process
    • IT security policies
    • Documentation of key technical characteristics that need to be part of provider profiling
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation template
    • Development leaders
    • Deployment team leaders
    • Infrastructure leaders
    • IT operations leaders
    • Product owners
    • Project managers

    Document Your Environment Details

    Environment

    Location

    Access

    Deployment

    Data

    Name of Environment

    Is the environment on premises or in the cloud (which cloud)?

    Is external access allowed?

    Is deployment automated or manual?

    Tool used for deployment

    Is reset automated?

    Does the environment contain unmasked production data?

    Dev

    Cloud

    Yes

    Automated

    Azure DevOps

    Yes

    No

    QA

    Cloud

    Yes

    Automated

    Azure DevOps

    Yes

    No

    Preprod

    On Premises

    No

    Manual

    N/A

    No

    Yes

    Phase 2

    Introspection

    1.1 Assess your market factors

    1.2 Determine your people factors

    1.3 Review your current culture

    1.4 Document your technical factors

    Profiling

    2.1 Recall your sourcing strategy

    2.2 Prioritize your company factors

    2.3 Create target profile

    Partner selection

    3.1 Review your RFx

    3.2 Identify target vendors

    3.3 Evaluate vendor

    responses

    Implementation

    4.1 Engage partner to choose contract mechanism

    4.2 Engage partner team to define goals

    4.3 Choose your success

    metrics

    This phase will help you to build a profile of the partner you should target in your search for a sourcing partner.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    Technology leaders

    Procurement leaders

    Product owners

    Project managers

    Build a profile for the right partner

    • Finding the perfect partner is a puzzle to solve, an exercise between the firm and the partners.
    • It is necessary to be able to prioritize and to identify opportunities where you can adapt to create a fit.
    • You must also bring forward the sourcing model you are seeking and prioritize factors based on that; for example, if you are seeking a nearshore partner, language may be less of a factor.

    Review factors based on sourcing choice

    Different factors are more important depending on whether you are insourcing or outsourcing.

    Key risks for insourcing

    • Alignment on communication strategy and method
    • Ability to align culturally
    • Need for face-to-face relationship building
    • Need for coaching skills

    Key risks for outsourcing

    • Giving control to the vendor
    • Legal and regulatory issues
    • Lack of knowledge at the vendor
    • Language and cultural fit

    Assessing your firm's position

    • The model you derived from the Sourcing Strategy research will inform the prioritization of factors for matching partners.

    Info-Tech Insight

    To find the best location for insourcing, or the best vendor for outsourcing, you need to identify your firm's positions on key risk areas.

    Step 2.1

    Recall your sourcing strategy

    Activities

    2.1.1 Define the key factors in your sourcing strategy

    This step involves the following participants:

    Technology Leaders

    Outcomes of this step

    Documentation of the Sourcing Strategy you arrived at in the Define a Sourcing Strategy exercises

    Choosing the right model

    The image contains a screenshot of the legend that will be used down below. The legend contains circles, from the left there is a empty circle, a one quarter filled circle, half filled circle, three-quarter filled circle , and a fully filled in circle.

    Determinant

    Key Questions to Ask

    Onshore

    Nearshore

    Offshore

    Outsource role(s)

    Outsource team

    Outsource product(s)

    Business dependence

    How much do you rely on business resources during the development cycle?

    The image contains a screenshot of the filled in whole circle to demonstrate high. The image contains a screenshot of the three-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium high. The image contains a screenshot of the one-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium low. The image contains a screenshot of the half filled circle to demonstrate medium. The image contains a screenshot of the one-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium low. The image contains a screenshot of the empty circle to demonstrate low.

    Absorptive capacity

    How successful has the organization been at bringing outside knowledge back into the firm?

    The image contains a screenshot of the empty circle to demonstrate low. The image contains a screenshot of the one-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium low. The image contains a screenshot of the one-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium low. The image contains a screenshot of the half filled circle to demonstrate medium. The image contains a screenshot of the one-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium low. The image contains a screenshot of the filled in whole circle to demonstrate high.

    Integration complexity

    How many integrations are required for the product to function – fewer than 5, 5-10, or more than 10?

    The image contains a screenshot of the filled in whole circle to demonstrate high. The image contains a screenshot of the three-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium high. The image contains a screenshot of the three-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium high. The image contains a screenshot of the half filled circle to demonstrate medium. The image contains a screenshot of the one-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium low. The image contains a screenshot of the empty circle to demonstrate low.

    Product ownership

    Do you have full-time product owners in place for the products? Do product owners have control of their roadmaps?

    The image contains a screenshot of the one-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium low. The image contains a screenshot of the half filled circle to demonstrate medium. The image contains a screenshot of the three-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium high. The image contains a screenshot of the half filled circle to demonstrate medium. The image contains a screenshot of the filled in whole circle to demonstrate high. The image contains a screenshot of the filled in whole circle to demonstrate high.

    Organization culture fit

    What are your organization’s communication and conflict resolution strategies? Is your organization geographically dispersed?

    The image contains a screenshot of the one-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium low. The image contains a screenshot of the one-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium low. The image contains a screenshot of the three-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium high. The image contains a screenshot of the one-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium low. The image contains a screenshot of the three-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium high. The image contains a screenshot of the filled in whole circle to demonstrate high.

    Vendor mgmt skills

    What is your skill level in vendor management? How old are your longest-standing vendor relationships?

    The image contains a screenshot of the empty circle to demonstrate low. The image contains a screenshot of the one-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium low. The image contains a screenshot of the one-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium low. The image contains a screenshot of the half filled circle to demonstrate medium. The image contains a screenshot of the three-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium high. The image contains a screenshot of the filled in whole circle to demonstrate high.

    2.1.1 Define the key factors in your sourcing strategy

    30 min

    For each product you are seeking a sourcing strategy for, document the following:

    1. Product or team name.
    2. Sourcing strategy based on Define a Sourcing Strategy.
    3. The primary drivers that led to this selection – Business Dependence, Absorptive Capacity, Integration Complexity, Product Ownership, Culture or Vendor Management.
    4. The reasoning for the selection based on that factor – e.g. we chose nearshoring based on high business dependence by our development team.

    Download the Select a Sourcing Partner Presentation Template

    Input Output
    • Sourcing Strategy from Define a Sourcing Strategy for your Development Team
    • Reasoning that drove the sourcing strategy selection
    Materials Participants
    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation template
    • Technology leadership

    Define sourcing strategy factors

    Sourcing strategy

    Factors that led to selection

    Product you are seeking a sourcing solution for

    Strategy defined

    Key factors that led to that choice

    Reasoning

    ABC

    Outsourcing - Offshore

    • Product ownership
    • Business integration
    • Product maturity
    • Technical environment

    Mature product ownership and low requirement for direct business involvement.

    Mature product with lower environments in cloud.

    Step 2.2

    Prioritize your company factors

    Activities

    2.2.1 Prioritize the factors from your sourcing strategy and confirm if mitigation or adaptation are possible.

    This step involves the following participants:

    IT Leadership team

    Outcomes of this step

    Prioritized list of key factors

    2.2.1 Prioritize your sourcing strategy factors

    30 min

    1. For each of the factors listed in exercise 2.1, prioritize them by importance to the firm.
    2. For each factor, please confirm if there is room to drive change internally to overcome the lack of a match – for example, if the culture being changed in language and conflict resolution is an option, then say Yes for that factor.

    Download the Select a Sourcing Partner Presentation Template

    InputOutput
    • Sourcing Strategy factors from 2.1
    • Prioritized list of sourcing strategy factors
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation template
    • Technology leaders

    Sourcing strategy factors and priority

    Sourcing strategy

    Factors that led to selection

    Priority of factor in decision

    Change possible

    Product you are seeking a sourcing solution for

    Strategy defined

    Key factors that led to your choice

    Reasoning

    Priority of factor 1-x

    Is there an opportunity to adapt this factor to a partner?

    ABC

    Outsourcing - offshore

    • Product ownership
    • Business integration
    • Product maturity
    • Technical environment

    Mature product ownership

    Low requirement for direct business involvement

    Mature product with lower environments in cloud

    2

    1

    3

    N

    N

    Y

    Step 2.3

    Create target profile

    Activities

    2.3.1 Profile your best fit

    This step involves the following participants:

    IT Leadership team

    Outcomes of this step

    Profile of the target partner

    Profiling your best fit

    Creating a target profile will help you determine which partners should be included in the process.

    Given the complexity of all the factors and trying to find the best fit from a multitude of partners, Info-Tech recommends forming a target profile for your best fit of partner.

    This profile provides a detailed assessment matrix to use to review potential partners.

    Profile should be created based on priority; "must haves" are high priority, while properties that have mitigation opportunities are optional or lower priority.

    Criteria

    Priority

    Some US Govt contracts – data and staff in NATO

    1

    Windows environment – Azure DEVOPS

    2

    Clients in FS

    3

    Agile SDLC

    4

    Collaborative communication and conflict resolution

    5

    Mature product management

    6

    Languages English and Spanish

    7

    Partner Profile

    • Teams in NATO and non-NATO countries
    • Windows skills with Azure
    • Financial Services experience
    • Utilize Agile and willing to plug into our teams
    • Used to collaborating with clients in one team environment
    • One centre in Latin / South America

    Info-Tech Insight

    The factors we have defined serve to build us a profile for the ideal partner to engage in sourcing our development team. This profile will lead us to be able to define our RFP / RFI and assess respondents.

    Case study: Cognizant is partnering with clients on product development

    INDUSTRY: Technology Services

    SOURCE: Interview with Jay MacIsaac, Cognizant

    Cognizant is driving quality solutions for clients

    • Strives to be primarily an industry-aligned organization that delivers multiple service lines in multiple geographies.
    • Seeks to carefully consider client culture to create one team.
    • Value proposition is a consultative approach bringing thought leadership and mutually adding value to the relationship vs the more traditional order taker development partner
    • Wants to share in solution development to facilitate shared successes. Geographic alignment drives knowledge of the client and their challenges, not just about time zone and supportability.
    • Offers one of the largest offshore capabilities in the world, supported by local and nearshore resources to drive local knowledge.
    • Realizes today’s clients don’t typically want a black box, they are sophisticated and want transparency around the process and solution, to have a partner.
    • Understands that clients do want to know where the work is being delivered from and how it's being delivered, and want to help manage expectations and overall risk.

    Synergy with Info-Tech’s approach

    • Best relationship comes when teams operate as one.
    • Clients are seeking value, not a development black box.
    • Clients want to have a partner they can engage with, not just an order taker.
    • Goal is a one-team culture with shared goals and delivering business value.
    • Ideal is a partner that will add to their thinking, not echo it.

    Results of this approach

    • Cognizant is continuing to deliver double-digit growth and continues to strive for top quartile performance.
    • Growth in the client base has seen the company grow to over 340,000 associates worldwide.

    Case study: Cabot Technology Solutions uses industry knowledge to drive successful partnerships

    INDUSTRY: Technology Services

    SOURCE: Interview with Shibu Basheer, Cabot Technology Solutions

    Cabot Technology Solutions findings

    • Cabot Technology Solutions looks to partner with clients and deliver expertise and value, not just application development.
      • Focus on building deep knowledge in their chosen vertical, Healthcare.
      • Focus on partnering with clients in this space who are seeking a partner to provide industry knowledge and use this to propel them forward.
      • Look to work with clients seeking a one team philosophy.
      • Avoid clients looking for a cheap provider.
    • Recognizing the initial apprehension to India as a location, they have built a practice in Ontario that serves as a bridge for their offshore team.
    • Cabot overcame initial views and built trust, while integrating the India team in parallel.

    Synergy with Info-Tech approach

    • Preference is partners, not a client/vendor relationship.
    • Single country model is set aside in favor of mix of near and offshore.
    • Culture is a one team approach, not the more adversarial order-taker approach.
    • Goal is to build long-term relationships of value, not task management.

    Results of this approach

    • Cabot is a recognized as a top software development company in many markets across the USA.
    • Cabot continues to drive growth and build referenceable client relationships across North America.

    2.3.1 Profile your best fit

    30 min

    1. Document the list of skills you are seeking from the People Factors – Skills Inventory in Section 1.2 – these represent the skills you are seeking in a partner.
    2. Document the culture you are looking for in a partner with respect to communications and conflict resolution in the culture section of the requirements – this comes from Section 1.3.
    3. Confirm the type of partner you are seeking – nearshore, offshore, or outsourcing based on the sourcing strategy priorities in Section 2.2.
    4. Confirm constraints that the partner must work under based on constraints from your market and competitor factors in Section 1.1.
    5. Confirm your technical requirements in terms of environments, tools, and processes that the vendor must align to from Section 1.4.

    Download the Select a Sourcing Partner Presentation Template

    Input Output

    All exercises done in Steps 11-1.4 and 2.1-2.2

    Profile of a target partner to drive the RFx Criteria

    Materials Participants

    Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation template

    Development leaders

    Deployment team leaders

    Infrastructure leaders

    IT operations leaders

    Product owners

    Project managers

    RFP skills requirement

    People skills required

    Product ownership

    Project management

    Skill

    Skill level required

    Tools / platform requirement

    Details of product management methodology and skills

    Details of firm's project management methodology

    .NET

    Medium

    Windows

    Highly mature, high skill

    Highly mature, high skill

    Java

    High

    Windows

    Low

    High

    RFx cultural characteristics

    Communication strategy

    Conflict resolution

    Organization / management

    Communication mediums supported

    Frequency of meetings expected

    Conflict resolutions strategies used at the firm

    Management methodology

    Face to face

    Weekly

    Collaborative

    Online

    Daily

    Hierarchical with manager

    Hierarchical

    RFx market constraints

    Constraints

    Partner proposal

    Constraint type

    Restrictions

    Market size required for

    Reasoning

    Data residency

    Data must stay in Canada for Canadian Gov't clients

    5% Canada public sector

    Competitive

    Offshoring dev means competition can take advantage

    95% Clients

    Need strategy to show data and leadership in NA, but delivering more innovation at lower cost by going offshore

    RFx technical requirements

    Technical environments

    Infrastructure

    Alignment of SDLC

    Tools required for development team

    Access control software required

    Infrastructure location

    Number of environments from development to production

    .Net Visual Studio

    Microsoft

    Azure

    4

    RFx scope of services

    Work being sourced

    Team sizing

    Work being sourced

    Skill level required

    Average size of release

    Releases per year

    Java development of new product

    High

    3-month development

    6

    .NET staff augmentation

    Medium

    ½-month development

    12

    Phase 3

    Choose the partner that will best enable you to move forward as one integrated team.

    Introspection

    1.1 Assess your market factors

    1.2 Determine your people factors

    1.3 Review your current culture

    1.4 Document your technical factors

    Profiling

    2.1 Recall your sourcing strategy

    2.2 Prioritize your company factors

    2.3 Create target profile

    Partner selection

    3.1 Review your RFx

    3.2 Identify target vendors

    3.3 Evaluate vendor

    responses

    Implementation

    4.1 Engage partner to choose contract mechanism

    4.2 Engage partner team to define goals

    4.3 Choose your success

    metrics

    For more details on Partner Selection, please refer to our research blueprint entitled Select an ERP Partner

    This phase will help you define your RFx for your provider search

    This phase involves the following participants:

    Vendor Management Team

    IT Leadership

    Finance Team

    Finding the right fit should always come before rates to determine value

    The right fit

    Determined in previous activities

    Negotiating will eventually bring the two together

    Value

    Rates

    Determined by skill and location

    Statement of Work (SOW) quality

    A quality SOW is the result of a quality RFI/RFP (RFx).

    The process up to now has been gathering the materials needed to build a quality RFx. Take this opportunity to review the outputs of the preceding activities to ensure that:

    • All the right stake holders have been engaged.
    • The requirements are complete.

    Info-Tech’s RFP Review as a Service looks for key items to ensure your RFx will generate quality responses and SOWs.

    • Is it well-structured with a consistent use of fonts and bullets?
    • Is it laid out in sections that are easily identifiable and progress from high-level to more detailed information?
    • Can a vendor quickly identify the ten (or fewer) things that are most important to you?

    The image contains a screenshot of the Request for Proposal Review as a Service.

    Step 3.1

    Review your RFx

    Activities

    3.1.1 Select your RFx template

    3.1.2 Finalize your RFx

    3.1.3 Weight each evaluation criteria

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project team
    • Evaluation team
    • Vendor management team
    • CIO

    Outcomes of this step

    • Completed RFx

    Info-Tech’s RFI/RFP process

    Info-Tech has well-established vendor management templates and practices

    • Identify Need
    • Define Business Requirements
    • Gain Business Authorization
    • Perform RFI/RFP
    • Negotiate Agreement
    • Purchase Goods and Services
    • Assess and Measure Performance

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    You’ll want to customize templates for your organization, but we strongly suggest that you take whatever you feel best meets your needs from both the long- and short-form RFPs presented in this blueprint.

    The secret to managing an RFP is to make it manageable. And the secret to making an RFP manageable is to treat it like any other aspect of business – by developing a process. With a process in place, you are better able to handle whatever comes your way, because you know the steps you need to follow to produce a top-notch RFP.

    Your RFP process should be tailored to fit the needs and specifics of your organization and IT.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Create a better RFP process using Info-Tech’s well-established templates and methodology.

    Create a Better RFP Process

    In a hurry? Consider an enhanced RFI instead of an RFP.

    While many organizations rarely use RFIs, they can be an effective tool in the vendor manager’s toolbox when used at the right time in the right way. RFIs can be deployed in competitive targeted negotiations. An enhanced RFI (ERFI) is a two-stage strategy that speeds up the typical RFP process. The first stage is like an RFI on steroids, and the second stage is targeted competitive negotiation.

    Stage 1:

    Create an RFI with all the customary components. Next, add a few additional RFP-like requirements (e.g. operational and technical requirements). Make sure you include a request for budgetary pricing and provide any significant features and functionality requirements so that the vendors have enough information to propose solutions. In addition, allow the vendors to ask questions through your single point of coordination and share answers with all the vendors. Finally, notify the vendors that you will not be doing an RFP – this is it!

    Stage 2:

    Review the vendors’ proposals and select the best two. Negotiate with both vendors and then make your decision.

    The ERFI shortens the typical RFP process, maintains leverage for your organization, and works great with low- to medium-spend items (however your organization defines them). You’ll get clarification on vendors’ competencies and capabilities, obtain a fair market price, and meet your internal clients’ aggressive timelines while still taking steps to protect your organization.

    RFI Template

    The image contains a screenshot of the RFI Template.

    Use this template to create your RFI baseline template. Be sure to modify and configure the template to your organization’s specifications.

    Request for Information Template

    Long-Form RFP Template

    Configure Info-Tech’s Long-Form RFP Template for major initiatives

    The image contains a screenshot of the long-form RFP Template.

    A long-form or major RFP is an excellent tool for more complex and complicated requirements. This example is for a baseline RFP.

    It starts with best-in-class RFP terms and conditions that are essential to maintaining your control throughout the RFP process. The specific requirements for the business, functional, technical, and pricing areas should be included in the exhibits at the end of the template. That makes it easier to tailor the RFP for each deal, since you and your team can quickly identify specific areas that need modification. Grouping the exhibits together also makes it convenient for both your team to review, and the vendors to respond.

    You can use this sample RFP as the basis for your template RFP, taking it all as is or picking and choosing the sections that best meet the mission and objectives of the RFP and your organization.

    Source: Info-Tech’s The Art of Creating a Quality RFP

    Short-Form RFP Template

    Configure Info-Tech’s Short-Form RFP Template for minor or smaller initiatives

    The image contains a screenshot of the Short-Form RFP Template.

    This example is for a less complex RFP that has relatively basic requirements and perhaps a small window in which the vendors can respond. As with the long-form RFP, exhibits are placed at the end of the RFP, an arrangement that saves time for both your team and the vendors. Of course, the short-form RFP contains fewer specific instructions, guidelines, and rules for vendors’ proposal submissions.

    We find that short-form RFPs are a good choice when you need to use something more than a request for quote (RFQ) but less than an RFP running 20 or more pages. It’s ideal, for example, when you want to send an RFP to only one vendor or to acquire items such as office supplies, contingent labor, or commodity items that require significant vendor's risk assessment.

    Source: The Art of Creating a Quality RFP

    3.1.1 Select your RFx template

    1-3 hours

    1. As a group, download the RFx templates from the previous three slides.
    2. Review your RFx process as a group. Be sure to include the vendor management team.
    3. Be sure to consider organization-specific procurement guidelines. These can be included. The objective here is to find the template that is the best fit. We will finalize the template in the next activity.
    4. Determine the best template for this project.
    Input Output
    • RFx templates
    • The RFx template that will be used for this project
    Materials Participants
    • Info-Tech’s Enhanced RFI Template, Long-Form RFP Template, and Short-Form RFP Template
    • Vendor management team
    • Project team
    • Project manager

    Finalize your RFx

    Key insights

    Leverage the power of the RFP

    • Too often RFPs fail to achieve their intended purposes, and your organization feels the effects of a poorly created RFP for many years.
    • If you are faced with a single source vendor, you can perform an RFP to one to create the competitive leverage.

    Make the response and evaluation process easier

    • Being strategic in your wording and formatting makes it easier on both parties – easier for the vendors to submit meaningful proposals, and easier for customer teams to evaluate.
    • Create a level playing field to encourage competition. Without multiple proposals, your options are limited and your chances for a successful project plummet.

    Maximize the competition

    • Leverage a pre-proposal conference to resolve vendor questions and to ensure all vendors receive the same answers to all questions. No vendor should have an information advantage.

    Do’s

    • Leverage your team’s knowledge.
    • Document and explain your RFP process to stakeholders and vendors.
    • Include contract terms in your RFP.
    • Measure and manage performance after contract award.
    • Seek feedback from the RFP team on your process and improve it as necessary.

    Don'ts

    • Reveal your budget.
    • Do an RFP in a vacuum.
    • Send an RFP to a vendor your team is not willing to award the business to.
    • Hold separate conversations with candidate vendors during your RFP process.
    • Skimp on the requirements definition to speed the process.
    • Tell the vendor they are selected before negotiating.

    3.1.2 Finalize your RFx

    1-3 hours

    1. As a group, review the selected RFI or RFP template.
    2. This is YOUR document. Modify it to suit the needs of the organization and even add sections from the other RFP templates that are relevant to your project.
    3. Use the Supplementary RFx Material as a guide.
    4. Add the content created in Steps 1 and 2.
    5. Add any organization-specific clauses or requirements.
    6. Have the project team review and comment on the RFP.
    7. Optional: Use Info-Tech’s RFP Review Concierge Service.

    Download the RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool

    Download the Supplementary RFx Material

    InputOutput
    • RFx template
    • Organizational specific guidelines
    • Materials from Steps 1 and 2
    • Supplementary RFx Material
    • Finalized RFx
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Electronic RFP document for editing
    • Vendor management team
    • Project team
    • Project manager

    3.1.2 Bring it all together

    Supplementary RFx Material

    The image contains a screenshot of Supplementary RFx Material.

    Review the sample content to get a feel for how to incorporate the results of the activities you have worked through into the RFx template.

    RFx Templates

    Use one of our templates to build a ready-for-distribution implementation partner RFx tailored to the unique success factors of your implementation.

    Exercises in Steps 1 and 2

    The image contains a screenshot of Exercises in Steps 1 and 2

    Use the material gathered during each activity to inform and populate the implementation partner requirements that are specific for your organization and project.

    The image contains a screenshot of the Long Form RFx template.The image contains a screenshot of the Short Form RFx template.

    3.1.3 Weight each evaluation criteria

    1-3 hours

    1. As a group, review the selected RFI or RFP template.
    2. This is your document. Modify it to suit the needs of the organization and even add sections from the other RFP templates that are relevant to your project.
    3. Use the Supplementary RFx Material as a guide.
    4. Utilize the content defined in Steps 1 and 2.
    5. Add any organization-specific clauses or requirements.
    6. Have the project team review and comment on the RFP.
    7. Optional: Use Info-Tech’s RFP Review Concierge Service.

    Download the Supplementary RFx Material

    InputOutput

    RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool

    Exercises from Steps 1 and 2

    • Weighted scoring tool to evaluate responses
    MaterialsParticipants
    • RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool
    • Supplementary RFx Material
    • Vendor management team
    • Project team
    • Project manager

    3.1.3 Apply weight to each evaluation criteria

    Use this tool to weight each critical success factor based on results of the activities within the vendor selection workbook for later scoring results.

    The image contains a screenshot of the RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool.

    Download the RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool

    Step 3.2

    Identify target vendors

    Activities

    3.2.1 Identify target vendors

    3.2.2 Define your RFx timeline

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project team
    • Vendor management team

    Outcomes of this step

    • Targeted vendor list
    • Initial RFx timeline

    3.2.1 Identify target vendors

    1-3 hours

    1. Based on the profile defined in Step 2.3, research potential partners that fit the profile, starting with those you may have used in the past. From this, build your initial list of vendors to target with your RFx.
    2. Break into smaller groups (or continue as a single group if it is already small) and review each shortlisted vendor to see if they will likely respond to the RFx.
    Input Output
    • Websites
    • Peers
    • Advisory groups
    • A shortlist of vendors to target with your RFx
    Materials Participants
    • RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool
    • CIO
    • Vendor management team
    • Project team
    • Evaluation team

    Download the RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool

    Define your RFx timeline

    Provider RFx timelines need to be clearly defined to keep the project and participants on track. These projects and processes can be long. Set yourself up for success by identifying the time frames clearly and communicating them to participants.

    1. Current
    • Concurrent ERP product selection
    • RFx preparation
    • Release of RFX
  • Near-term
    • Responses received
    • Scoring responses
    • Shortlisting providers
    • Provider interviews
    • Provider selection
    • Provider contract negotiations
    • Contract with provider
  • Future
    • Initiation of knowledge transfer
    • Joint development period
    • Cutover to provider team

    89% of roadmap views have at least some representation of time. (Roadmunk, n.d.)

    Info-Tech Insight

    The true value of time horizons is in dividing your timeline and applying different standards and rules, which allows you to speak to different audiences and achieve different communication objectives.

    3.2.2 Define your RFx timeline

    1-3 hours

    1. As a group identify an appropriate timeline for your RFP process. Info-Tech recommends no less than three months from RFx release to contract signing.

      Keep in mind that you need to allow for time to engage the team and perform some level of knowledge transfer, and to seed the team with internal resources for the initial period.
    2. Leave enough time for vendor responses, interviews, and reference checks.
    3. Once the timeline is finalized, document it and communicate it to the organization.

    Download the RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool

    Input Output
    • RFx template
    • Provider RFx timeline
    Materials Participants
    • RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool
    • Vendor management team
    • Project team
    • Project manager

    Define your RFx timeline

    The image contains a screenshot of an example of an RFx timeline.

    Step 3.3

    Evaluate vendor responses

    Activities

    3.3.1 Evaluate responses

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Evaluation team

    Outcomes of this step

    • Vendor submission scores

    3.3.1 Evaluate responses

    1-3 hours

    1. Use the RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool to collect and record the evaluation team's scores for each vendor's response to your RFx.
    2. Then record and compare each team member's scores to rank the vendors' responses.
    3. The higher the score, the closer the fit.

    Download the RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool

    InputOutput
    • Vendor responses
    • Vendor presentations
    • Vendor scores
    MaterialsParticipants
    • RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool
    • Evaluation team

    3.3.1 Score vendor results

    Use the RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool to score the vendors' responses to your RFx using the weighted scale from Activity 3.1.3.

    The image contains a screenshot of the RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool.

    Download the RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool

    Phase 4

    Measuring the new relationship

    Introspection

    1.1 Assess your market factors

    1.2 Determine your people factors

    1.3 Review your current culture

    1.4 Document your technical factors

    Profiling

    2.1 Recall your sourcing strategy

    2.2 Prioritize your company factors

    2.3 Create target profile

    Partner selection

    3.1 Review your RFx

    3.2 Identify target vendors

    3.3 Evaluate vendor

    responses

    Implementation

    4.1 Engage partner to choose contract mechanism

    4.2 Engage partner team to define goals

    4.3 Choose your success

    metrics

    This phase will allow you to define the relationship with your newly chosen partner, including choosing the right contract mechanism, defining shared goals for the relationship, and selecting the metrics and processes to measure performance.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    IT leadership

    Procurement team

    Product owners

    Project managers

    Implementing the Partner

    Implementing the new partner is an exercise in collaboration

    • Successfully implementing your new partner is an exercise in working together
    1. Define a contract mechanism that is appropriate for the relationship, but is not meant as punitive, contract-based management – this sets you up for failure.
    2. Engage with your team and your partner as one team to build shared, measurable goals
    3. Work with the team to define the metrics and processes by which progress against these goals will be measured
  • Goals, metrics and process should be transparent to the team so all can see how their performance ties to success
  • Make sure to take time to celebrate successes with the whole team as one
  • Info-Tech Insight

    Implement the relationship the same way you want it to work: as one team. Work together on contract mechanism, shared goals, metrics, and performance measurement. This transparency and collaboration will build a one team view, leading to long-term success.

    Step 4.1

    Engage partner to choose contract mechanism

    Activities

    4.1.1 Confirm your contract mechanism

    This step involves the following participants:

    IT leadership

    Procurement team

    Vendor team

    Outcomes of this step

    Contract between the vendor and the firm for the services

    Negotiate agreement

    Evaluate your RFP responses to see if they are complete and if the vendor followed your instructions.

    Then:

    Plan negotiation(s) with one or more vendors based on your questions and opportunities identified during evaluation.

    Select finalist(s).

    Apply selection criteria.

    Resolve vendors' exceptions.

    Negotiate before you select your vendor:

    Negotiating with two or more vendors will maintain your competitive leverage while decreasing the time it takes to negotiate the deal.

    Perform legal reviews as necessary.

    Use sound competitive negotiations principles.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Be certain to include any commitments made in the RFP, presentations, and proposals in the agreement, as the standard for an underperforming vendor.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Providing contract terms in an RFP can dramatically reduce time for this step by understanding the vendor’s initial contractual position for negotiation.

    Leverage ITRG's negotiation process research for additional information

    For more details on this process please see our research Drive Successful Sourcing Outcomes with a Robust RFP Process

    4.1.1 Confirm your contract mechanism

    30 min

    1. Does the firm have prior experience with this type of sourcing arrangement?
    2. Does the firm have an existing services agreement with the selected partner?
    3. What contract mechanisms have been used in the past for these types of arrangements?
    4. What mechanism was proposed by the partner in their RFP response?

    Download the Select a Sourcing Partner Presentation Template

    Input Output
    • Past sourcing agreements from Procurement
    • Proposed agreement from partner
    • Agreed upon contract mechanism
    Materials Participants
    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation template
    • Technology leaders
    • Vendor management group
    • Partner leaders

    Choose the appropriate contract method

    Work being sourced

    Partner proposal

    Agreed-upon mechanism

    Work being sourced

    Vendor management experience with type

    Partner proposed contract method

    Agreed-upon contract method

    Java development team to build new product

    Similar work done with fixed price with another vendor

    Time and materials per scrum team

    Time and materials per scrum team to avoid vendor conflicts inherent in fixed price which limit innovation

    Step 4.2

    Engage partner team to define shared goals

    Activities

    4.2.1 Define your shared goals

    This step involves the following participants:

    IT leadership

    Vendor leadership

    Outcomes of this step

    Shared goals for the team

    Define success and shared goals

    Work together to define how you will measure yourselves.

    One team

    • Treating the new center and the existing team as one team is critical to long-term success.
    • Having a plan that allows for teams to meet frequently face-to-face "get to know you" and "stay connected" sessions will help the team gel.

    Shared goals

    • New group must share common goals and measurements.

    Common understanding

    • New team must have a common understanding and culture on key facets such as:
      • Measurement of quality
      • Openness to feedback and knowledge sharing
      • Culture of collaboration
      • Issue and Risk Management

    4.2.1 Define your shared goals

    30 min

    1. List each item in the scope of work for the sourcing arrangement – e.g. development of product XXX.
    2. For each scope item, detail the benefit expected by the firm – e.g. development cost expected to drop by 10% per year, or customer satisfaction improvement.
    3. For each benefit define how you will measure success – e.g. track cost of development for the development team assigned, or track Customer Satisfaction Survey results.
    4. For each measure, define a target for this year – e.g. 10% decrease over last year's cost, or customer satisfaction improvement from 6 to 7.

    Download the Select a Sourcing Partner Presentation Template

    InputOutput
    • Services being procured from RFx
    • Benefits expected from the sourcing strategy
    • Baseline scores for measurements
    • Shared goals agreed upon between team and partner
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation template
    • Technology leaders
    • Partner leaders

    Define goals collaboratively

    Role and benefit

    Goals and objectives

    Role / work being sourced

    Benefit expected

    Measure of success

    Year over year targets

    Java development team to build new product

    New product to replace aging legacy

    Launch of new product

    Agree on launch schedule and MVP for each release / roadmap

    Step 4.3

    Choose your success metrics

    Activities

    4,3.1 Define metrics and process to monitor

    This step involves the following participants:

    IT leadership

    Product owners

    Project managers

    Vendor leaders

    Outcomes of this step

    Metrics and process to measure performance

    4.3.1 Define metrics and process to monitor

    30 min

    1. For each goal defined and measure of success, break down the measure into quantifiable, measurable factors – e.g. Development cost is defined as all the costs tracked to the project including development, deployment, project management, etc.
    2. For each factor choose the metric that can be reported on – e.g. project actuals.
    3. For each metric define the report and reporting frequency – e.g. monthly project actuals from project manager.

    Download the Select a Sourcing Partner Presentation Template

    InputOutput
    • Development process
    • Deployment process
    • Operations process
    • IT Security policies
    • Documentation of key technical characteristics that need to be part of provider profiling
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation template
    • Development leaders
    • Deployment team leaders
    • Infrastructure leaders
    • IT operations leaders
    • Product owners
    • Project managers

    Agreed-upon metrics

    Goal

    Metrics and process

    Agreed-upon goal

    Year 1 target

    Metric to measure success

    Measurement mechanism

    Deliver roadmap of releases

    3 releases – MVP in roadmap

    Features and stories delivered

    Measure delivery of stories from Jira

    Research Contributor

    The image contains a picture of Alaisdar Graham.

    Alaisdar Graham

    Executive Counsellor

    Info-Tech Research Group

    During Alaisdar’s 35-year career in information and operational technology, Alaisdar has been CIO for public sector organizations and private sector companies. He has been an entrepreneur with his own consultancy and a founder or business advisor with four cyber-security start-ups, Alaisdar has developed experience across a broad range of industries within a number of different countries and become known for his ability to drive business benefits and improvements through the use of technology.

    Alaisdar has worked with CXO-level executives across different businesses. Whether undertaking a digital transformation, building and improving IT functions across your span of control, or helping you create and execute an integrated technology strategy, Alaisdar can provide insight while introducing you to Info-Tech Research Group’s experts. Alaisdar’s experience with organizational turn- around, governance, project, program and portfolio management, change management, risk and security will support your organization’s success.

    Research Contributor

    The image contains a picture of Richard Nachazel.

    Richard Nachazel

    Executive Counsellor

    Info-Tech Research Group

    • Richard has more than 40 years working in various Fortune 500 organizations. His specialties are collaborating with business and IT executives and senior stakeholders to define strategic goals and transform operational protocols, standards, and methodologies. He has established a reputation at multiple large companies for taking charge of critical, high-profile enterprise projects in jeopardy of failure and turning them around. Colleagues and peers recognize his ability to organize enterprise efforts, build, develop, and motivate teams, and deliver outstanding outcomes.
    • Richard has worked as a Global CISO & Head of IT Governance for a Swiss Insurance company, Richard developed and led a comprehensive Cyber-Security Framework that provided leadership and oversight of the cyber-security program. Additionally, he was responsible for their IT Governance Risk & Compliance Operation and the information data security compliance in a complex global environment. Richard’s experience with organizational turn around, governance, risk, and controls, and security supports technology delivery integration with business success. Richard’s ability to engage executive and senior management decision makers and champion vision will prove beneficial to your organization.

    Research Contributor

    The image contains a picture of Craig Broussard.

    Craig Broussard

    Executive Counsellor

    Info-Tech Research Group

    • Craig has over 35 years of IT experience including software development, enterprise system management, infrastructure, and cyber security operations. Over the last 20 years, his focus has been on infrastructure and security along with IT service management. He’s been an accomplished speaker and panelist at industry trade events over the past decade.
    • Craig has served as Global Infrastructure Director for NCH Corporation, VP of Information Technology at ATOS, and earlier in his career as the Global Head of Data Center Services at Nokia Siemens Networks. Craig also worked for MicroSolutions (a Mark Cuban Company). Additionally, Craig received formal consulting training while working for IBM Global Services.
    • Craig’s deep experience across many aspects of IT from Governance through Delivery makes him an ideal partner for Info-Tech members.

    Bibliography

    Offshore, Onshore or Hybrid–Choosing the Best IT Outsourcing Model. (n.d.).
    Offshore Dedicated Development Team – A Compelling Hiring Guide. (n.d.).
    The Three Non-Negotiables Of IT Offshoring. (n.d.). Forbes.
    Top Ten Countries For Offshoring. Forbes, 2004.
    Nearshoring in Europe: Choose the Best Country for IT Outsourcing - The World Financial Review. (n.d.).
    Select an Offshore Jurisdiction. The Best Countries for Business in 2021-2022! | InternationalWealth.info. (n.d.).
    How to Find the Best Country to Set Up an Offshore Company. (n.d.). biz30.
    Akbar, M. A., Alsanad, A., Mahmood, S., & Alothaim, A. (2021). Prioritization-based taxonomy of global software development challenges: A FAHP based analysis. IEEE Access, 9, 37961–37974
    Ali, S. (2018). Practices in Software Outsourcing Partnership: Systematic Literature Review Protocol with Analysis. Journal of Computers, (February), 839–861
    Baird Georgia, A. (2007). MISQ Research Curation on Health Information Technology 2. Progression of Health IT Research in MIS Quarterly. MIS Quarterly, 2007(June), 1–14.
    Akbar, M. A., Alsanad, A., Mahmood, S., & Alothaim, A. (2021). Prioritization-based taxonomy of global software development challenges: A FAHP based analysis. IEEE Access, 9, 37961–37974
    Ali, S. (2018). Practices in Software Outsourcing Partnership: Systematic Literature Review Protocol with Analysis. Journal of Computers, (February), 839–861
    Baird Georgia, A. (2007). MISQ Research Curation on Health Information Technology 2. Progression of Health IT Research in MIS Quarterly. MIS Quarterly, 2007(June), 1–14.
    Carmel, E., & Abbott, P. (2006). Configurations of global software development: offshore versus nearshore. … on Global Software Development for the Practitioner, 3–7.
    Hanafizadeh, P., & Zare Ravasan, A. (2018). A model for selecting IT outsourcing strategy: the case of e-banking channels. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 21(2), 111–138.
    Ishizaka, A., Bhattacharya, A., Gunasekaran, A., Dekkers, R., & Pereira, V. (2019). Outsourcing and offshoring decision making. International Journal of Production Research, 57(13), 4187–4193.
    Jeong, J. J. (2021). Success in IT offshoring: Does it depend on the location or the company? Arxiv.
    Joanna Minkiewicz, J. E. (2009). Deakin Research Online Online. 2007, Interrelationships between Innovation and Market Orientation in SMEs, Management Research News, Vol. 30, No. 12, Pp. 878-891., 30(12), 878–891.

    Bibliography

    King, W. R., & Torkzadeh, G. (2016). Special Issue Information Systems Offshoring : Research Status and Issues. MIS Quarterly, 32(2), 205–225.
    Kotlarsky, J., & Oshri, I. (2008). Country attractiveness for offshoring and offshore outsourcing: Additional considerations. Journal of Information Technology, 23(4), 228–231.
    Lehdonvirta, V., Kässi, O., Hjorth, I., Barnard, H., & Graham, M. (2019). The Global Platform Economy: A New Offshoring Institution Enabling Emerging-Economy Microproviders. Journal of Management, 45(2), 567–599.
    Mahajan, A. (2018). Risks and Benefits of Using Single Supplier in Software Development. Oulu University of Applied Sciences. Retrieved from
    Murberg, D. (2019). IT Offshore Outsourcing: Best Practices for U.S.-Based Companies. University of Oregon Applied Information Management, 1277(800), 824–2714.
    Nassimbeni, G., Sartor, M., & Dus, D. (2012). Security risks in service offshoring and outsourcing. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 112(3), 405–440.
    Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15(2–3), 139–178.
    Pilkova, A., & Holienka, M. (2018). Home-Based Business in Visegrad Countries: Gem Perspective. Innovation Management, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability 2018 Proceedings of the 6th International Conference.
    Rahman, H. U., Raza, M., Afsar, P., Alharbi, A., Ahmad, S., & Alyami, H. (2021). Multi-criteria decision making model for application maintenance offshoring using analytic hierarchy process. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11(18).
    Rahman, H. U., Raza, M., Afsar, P., Khan, H. U., & Nazir, S. (2020). Analyzing factors that influence offshore outsourcing decision of application maintenance. IEEE Access, 8, 183913–183926.
    Roadmunk. What is a product roadmap? Roadmunk, n.d. Accessed 12 Oct. 2021.
    Rottman, J. W., & Lacity, M. C. (2006). Proven practices for effectively offshoring IT work. MIT Sloan Management Review.
    Smite, D., Moe, N. B., Krekling, T., & Stray, V. (2019). Offshore Outsourcing Costs: Known or Still Hidden? Proceedings - 2019 ACM/IEEE 14th International Conference on Global Software Engineering, ICGSE 2019, 40–47.
    Welsum, D. Van, & Reif, X. (2005). Potential Offshoring: Evidence from Selected OECD Countries. Brookings Trade Forum, 2005(1), 165–194.
    Zhang, Y., Liu, S., Tan, J., Jiang, G., & Zhu, Q. (2018). Effects of risks on the performance of business process outsourcing projects: The moderating roles of knowledge management capabilities. International Journal of Project Management, 36(4), 627–639.

    Simplify Remote Deployment With Zero-Touch Provisioning

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}310|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact (scale of 10): 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $5,199 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 5 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: End-User Computing Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /end-user-computing-strategy

    Provide better end-user device support to a remote workforce:

    • Remain compliant while purchasing, deploying, supporting, and decommissioning devices.
    • Save time and resources during device deployment while providing a high-quality experience to remote end users.
    • Build a set of capabilities that will let you support different use cases.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Zero-touch is more than just deployment. This is more difficult than turning on a tool and provisioning new devices to end users.
    • Consider the entire user experience and device lifecycle to show value to the organization. Don’t forget that you will eventually need to touch the device.

    Impact and Result

    Approach zero-touch provisioning and patching from the end user’s experience:

    • Align your zero-touch approach with stakeholder priorities and larger IT strategies.
    • Build your zero-touch provisioning and patching plan from both the asset lifecycle and the end-user perspective to take a holistic approach that emphasizes customer service.
    • Tailor deployment plans to more easily scope and resource deployment projects.

    Simplify Remote Deployment With Zero-Touch Provisioning Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should adopt zero-touch provisioning, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Design the zero-touch experience

    Design the user’s experience and build a vision to direct your zero-touch provisioning project. Update your ITAM practices to reflect the new experience.

    • Zero-Touch Provisioning and Support Plan
    • HAM Process Workflows (Visio)
    • HAM Process Workflows (PDF)
    • End-User Device Management Standard Operating Procedure

    2. Update device management, provisioning, and patching

    Leverage new tools to manage remote endpoints, keep those devices patched, and allow users to get the apps they need to work.

    • End-User Device Build Book Template

    3. Build a roadmap and communication plan

    Create a roadmap for migrating to zero-touch provisioning.

    • Roadmap Tool
    • Communication Plan Template
    [infographic]