Enable Organization-Wide Collaboration by Scaling Agile

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}174|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: 8.3/10 Overall Impact
  • member rating average dollars saved: $12,989 Average $ Saved
  • member rating average days saved: 10 Average Days Saved
  • Parent Category Name: Architecture & Strategy
  • Parent Category Link: /architecture-and-strategy
  • Your organization is realizing benefits from adopting Agile principles and practices in pockets of your organization.
  • You are starting to investigate opportunities to extend Agile beyond these pilot implementations into other areas of the organization. You are looking for a coordinated approach aligned to business priorities.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • Not all lessons from a pilot project are transferable. Pilot processes are tailored to a specific project’s scope, team, and tools, and they may not account for the diverse attributes in your organization.
  • Control may be necessary for coordination. More moving parts means enforcing consistent cadences, reporting, and communication is a must if teams are not disciplined or lack good governance.
  • Scale Agile in departments tolerable to change. Incrementally roll Agile out in departments where its principles are accepted (e.g. a culture of continuous improvement, embracing failures as lessons).

Impact and Result

  • Complete an Agile capability assessment of your pilot functional group to gauge anticipated Agile benefits. Identify the business objectives and the group drivers that are motivating a scaled Agile implementation.
  • Understand the challenges that you may face when scaling Agile. Investigate the root causes of inefficiencies that can derail your scaling initiatives.
  • Brainstorm solutions to your scaling challenges and envision a target state for your growing Agile environment. Your target state will discover new opportunities to drive more business value and eliminate current activities driving down productivity.
  • Coordinate the implementation and execution of scaling Agile initiatives with a Scaling Agile Playbook. This organic and collaborative document will lay out the process, roles, goals, and objectives needed to successfully manage your Agile environment.

Enable Organization-Wide Collaboration by Scaling Agile Research & Tools

Start here – read the Executive Brief

Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should scale up Agile, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Gauge readiness to scale up Agile

Evaluate the readiness of the pilot functional group and Agile development processes to adopt scaled Agile practices.

  • Enable Organization-Wide Collaboration by Scaling Agile – Phase 1: Gauge Readiness to Scale Up Agile
  • Scaling Agile Playbook Template
  • Scrum Development Process Template

2. Define scaled Agile target state

Alleviate scaling issues and risks and introduce new opportunities to enhance business value delivery with Agile practices.

  • Enable Organization-Wide Collaboration by Scaling Agile – Phase 2: Define Scaled Agile Target State

3. Create implementation plan

Roll out scaling Agile initiatives in a gradual, iterative approach and define the right metrics to demonstrate success.

  • Enable Organization-Wide Collaboration by Scaling Agile – Phase 3: Create Implementation Plan
[infographic]

Workshop: Enable Organization-Wide Collaboration by Scaling Agile

Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

1 Gauge Your Readiness to Scale Up Agile

The Purpose

Identify the business objectives and functional group drivers for adopting Agile practices to gauge the fit of scaling Agile.

Select the pilot project to demonstrate the value of scaling Agile.

Review and evaluate your current Agile development process and functional group structure.

Key Benefits Achieved

Understanding of the notable business and functional group gaps that can derail the scaling of Agile.

Selection of a pilot program that will be used to gather metrics to continuously improve implementation and obtain buy-in for wider rollout.

Realization of the root causes behind functional group and process issues in the current Agile implementation.

Activities

1.1 Assess your pilot functional group

Outputs

Fit assessment of functional group to pilot Agile scaling

Selection of pilot program

List of critical success factors

2 Define Your Scaled Agile Target State

The Purpose

Think of solutions to address the root causes of current communication and process issues that can derail scaling initiatives.

Brainstorm opportunities to enhance the delivery of business value to customers.

Generate a target state for your scaled Agile implementation.

Key Benefits Achieved

Defined Agile capabilities and services of your functional group.

Optimized functional group team structure, development process, and program framework to support scaled Agile in your context.

Identification and accommodation of the risks associated with implementing and executing Agile capabilities.

Activities

2.1 Define Agile capabilities at scale

2.2 Build your scaled Agile target state

Outputs

Solutions to scaling issues and opportunities to deliver more business value

Agile capability map

Functional group team structure, Agile development process and program framework optimized to support scaled Agile

Risk assessment of scaling Agile initiatives

3 Create Your Implementation Plan

The Purpose

List metrics to gauge the success of your scaling Agile implementation.

Define the initiatives to scale Agile in your organization and to prepare for a wider rollout.

Key Benefits Achieved

Strategic selection of the right metrics to demonstrate the value of scaling Agile initiatives.

Scaling Agile implementation roadmap based on current resource capacities, task complexities, and business priorities.

Activities

3.1 Create your implementation plan

Outputs

List of metrics to gauge scaling Agile success

Scaling Agile implementation roadmap

Skills Development on the Mainframe Platform

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}336|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: N/A
  • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
  • member rating average days saved: N/A
  • Parent Category Name: Strategy and Organizational Design
  • Parent Category Link: /strategy-and-organizational-design

Mainframes remain a critical part of an organization’s infrastructure and will need to support these platforms for the foreseeable future. Despite the importance, it can be a challenge for organizations to find qualified resources to support them. Meanwhile, companies are unsure of where to find help to train and develop their teams on mainframe technologies and are at risk of a skills gap within their teams.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • Mainframes continue to have wide usage, particularly in enterprise organizations. The complexity of moving or replatforming many of these applications means these platforms will be around for a long time still.
  • Companies need to be proactive about developing their teams to support their mainframe systems.

Impact and Result

  • Companies can protect their assets by cultivating a pipeline of qualified resources to support their mainframe infrastructure.
  • There is a robust training ecosystem headed by large, reputable organizations to help develop and support companies' resources. You don’t have to do it alone.

Skills Development on the Mainframe Platform Research & Tools

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Skills Development on the Mainframe Platform Storyboard – An overview of the solutions available to support your mainframe training and skills development needs.

Your mainframes are not going to disappear overnight. These systems often support the most critical operations in your organization. You need to ensure you have the right qualified resources to support your platforms.

  • Skills Development on the Mainframe Platform Storyboard
[infographic]

Looking at Risk in a New Light: The Six Pillars of Vendor Risk Management

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}209|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: N/A
  • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
  • member rating average days saved: N/A
  • Parent Category Name: Vendor Management
  • Parent Category Link: /vendor-management

  • Moreso than at any other time, our world is changing. As a result, organizations – and their vendors – need to be able to adapt their plans to accommodate risk on an unprecedented level.
  • It is increasingly likely that one of an organization's vendors, or their n-party support vendors, will cause an incident. Organizations must protect themselves by creating better mechanisms to hold their n-party vendors accountable and validate that they comply.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • Identifying and managing a vendor’s potential risk impact on your organization requires multiple people in the organization across several functions. Those people all need coaching on the potential changes in the market and how these changes may affect your organization.
  • Organizational leadership is often taken unaware by changes, and their plans lack the flexibility to adjust to significant regulatory upheavals.

Impact and Result

  • Vendor management practices educate organizations on the different potential risks from vendors in your market and suggest creative and alternative ways to avoid and help manage them.
  • Prioritize and classify your vendors with quantifiable, standardized rankings.
  • Prioritize focus on your high-risk vendors.
  • Standardize your processes for identifying and monitoring vendor risks with our Comprehensive Risk Impact Tool to manage potential impacts.

Looking at Risk in a New Light: The Six Pillars of Vendor Risk Management Research & Tools

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Looking at Risk in a New Light: The Six Pillars of Vendor Risk Management – Use the research to better understand the negative impacts of vendor actions to your organization

Use this research to identify and quantify the potential risk impacts caused by vendors. Utilize Info-Tech's approach to look at the impact from various perspectives to better prepare for issues that may arise.

  • Looking at Risk in a New Light: The Six Pillars of Vendor Risk Management Storyboard

2. Comprehensive Risk Impact Tool – Use this tool to help identify and quantify the impacts of negative vendor actions.

By playing the “what if” game and asking probing questions to draw out – or eliminate – possible negative outcomes, everyone involved adds their insight into parts of the organization to gather a comprehensive picture of potential impacts.

  • Comprehensive Risk Impact Tool
[infographic]

Further reading

Looking at Risk in a New Light: The Six Pillars of Vendor Risk Management

Approach vendor risk impact assessments from all perspectives.

Analyst Perspective

Organizations must comprehensively understand the impacts vendors may cause through different potential actions.

Frank Sewell

The risks from the vendor market have become more prevalent as the technologies and organizational strategies shift to a global direction. With this shift in risk comes a necessary perspective change to align with the greater likelihood of an incident occurring from vendors' (or one of their downstream support vendor's) negative actions.

Organizational leadership must become more aware of the increasing risks that engaging vendors impose. To do so, they need to make informed decisions, which can only be provided by engaging expert resources in their organizations to compile a comprehensive look at potential risk impacts.

Frank Sewell

Research Director, Vendor Management
Info-Tech Research Group

Executive Summary

Your Challenge

More so than at any other time, our world is changing. As a result organizations – and their vendors – need to be able to adapt their plans to accommodate risk on an unprecedented level.

It is increasingly likely that one of your vendors, or their n-party support vendors, will cause an incident. Organizations must protect themselves by creating better mechanisms to hold their n-party vendors accountable and validate that they comply.

Common Obstacles

Identifying and managing a vendor’s potential risk impact on your organization requires multiple people in the organization across several functions. Those people all need coaching on the potential changes in the market and how these changes may affect your organization.

Organizational leadership is often taken unaware by changes, and their plans lack the flexibility to adjust to significant regulatory upheavals.

Info-Tech's Approach

Vendor management practices educate organizations on the different potential risks from vendors in your market and suggest creative and alternative ways to avoid and help manage them.

Prioritize and classify your vendors with quantifiable, standardized rankings.

Prioritize focus on your high-risk vendors.

Standardize your processes for identifying and monitoring vendor risks with our Comprehensive Risk Impact Tool to manage potential impacts.

Info-Tech Insight

Organizations must evolve their risk assessments to be more adaptive to respond to changes in the global market. Ongoing monitoring and continual assessment of vendors’ risks is crucial to avoiding negative impacts.

Info-Tech’s multi-blueprint series on vendor risk assessment

There are many individual components of vendor risk beyond cybersecurity.`

6 components of vendor risk beyond cybersecurity.  Financial, Reputational, Operational, Strategic, Security, Regulatory & Compliance.

This series will focus on the individual components of vendor risk and how vendor management practices can facilitate organizations’ understanding of those risks.

Out of Scope:
This series will not tackle risk governance, determining overall risk tolerance and appetite, or quantifying inherent risk.

The world is constantly changing

The IT market is constantly reacting to global influences. By anticipating changes, leaders can set expectations and work with their vendors to accommodate them.

When the unexpected happens, being able to adapt quickly to new priorities ensures continued long-term business success.

Below are some things no one expected to happen in the last few years:

62%

of IT professionals are more concerned about being a victim of ransomware than they were a year ago.

Info-Tech Tech Trends Survey 2022

82%

of Microsoft non-essential employees shifted to working from home in 2020, joining the 18% already remote.

Info-Tech Tech Trends Survey 2022

89%

of organizations invested in web conferencing technology to facilitate collaboration.

Info-Tech Tech Trends Survey 2022

Looking at Risk in a New Light:

the 6 Pillars of Vendor Risk Management

Vendor Risk

  • Financial

  • Strategic

  • Operational

  • Security

  • Reputational

  • Regulatory

  • Organizations must review their risk appetite and tolerance levels, considering their complete landscape.
  • Changing regulations, acquisitions, and events that affect global supply chains are current realities, not unlikely scenarios.
  • Prepare your vendor risk management for success using due diligence and scenario- based “What If” discussions to bring all the relevant parties to the table and educate your whole organization on risk factors.
Assessing Financial Risk Impacts

Strategic risks on a global scale

Odds are at least one of these is currently affecting your strategic plans

  • Vendor Acquisitions
  • Global Pandemic
  • Global Shortages
  • Gas Prices
  • Poor Vendor Performance
  • Travel Bans
  • War
  • Natural Disasters
  • Supply Chain Disruptions
  • Security Incidents

Make sure you have the right people at the table to identify and plan to manage impacts.

Assess internal and external operational risk impacts

Two sides of the same coin

Internal

  • Poorly vetted supplemental staff
  • Bad system configurations
  • Lack of relevant skills
  • Poor vendor performance
  • Failure to follow established processes
  • Weak contractual accountability
  • Unsupportable or end-of-life system components

External

  • Cyberattacks
  • Supply Chain Issues
  • Geo-Political Disruptions
  • Vendor Acquisitions
  • N-Party Non-Compliance
  • Vendor Fraud

Operational risk is the risk of losses caused by flawed or failed processes, policies, systems, or events that disrupt business operations.

Identify and manage security risk impacts on your organization

Due diligence will enable successful outcomes

  • Poor vendor performance
  • Vendor acquisition
  • Supply chain disruptions and shortages
  • N-party risk
  • Third-party risk

What your vendor associations say about you

Reputations that affect your brand: Bad customer reviews, breach of data, poor security posture, negative news articles, public lawsuits, poor performance.

Regulatory compliance

Consider implementing vendor management initiatives and practices in your organization to help gain compliance with your expanding vendor landscape.

Your organizational risks may be monitored but are your n-party vendors?

6 components of vendor risk beyond cybersecurity.  Financial, Reputational, Operational, Strategic, Security, Regulatory & Compliance.

Review your expectations with your vendors and hold them accountable

Regulatory entities are looking beyond your organization’s internal compliance these days. Instead, they are more and more diving into your third-party and downstream relationships, particularly as awareness of downstream breaches increases globally.

  • Are you assessing your vendors regularly?
  • Are you validating those assessments?
  • Do your vendors have a map of their downstream support vendors?
  • Do they have the mechanisms to hold those downstream vendors accountable to your standards?

Identify and manage risks

Regulatory

Regulatory agencies are putting more enforcement around ESG practices across the globe. As a result, organizations will need to monitor the changing regulations and validate that their vendors and n-party support vendors are adhering to these regulations or face penalties for non-compliance.

Security-Data protection

Data protection remains an issue. Organizations should ensure that the data their vendors obtain remains protected throughout the vendor’s lifecycle, including post-termination. Otherwise, they could be monitoring for a data breach in perpetuity.

Mergers and acquisitions

More prominent vendors continuously buy smaller companies to control the market in the IT industry. Organizations should put protections in their contracts to ensure that an IT vendor’s acquisition does not put them in a relationship with someone that could cause them an issue.

Identify and manage risks

Poor vendor performance

Consider the impact of a vendor that fails to perform midway through the implementation. Organizations need to be able to manage the impact of replacing that vendor and cutting their losses rather than continuing to throw good money away after bad performance.

Supply chain disruptions and global shortages

Geopolitical disruptions and natural disasters have caused unprecedented interruptions to business. Incorporate forecasting of product and ongoing business continuity planning into your strategic plans to adapt as events unfold.

Poorly configured systems

Failing to ensure that your vendor-supported systems are properly configured and that your vendors are meeting your IT change control and configuration standards is more commonplace than expected. Proper oversight and management of your support vendors is crucial to ensure they are meeting expectations in this regard.

What to look for

Identify potential risk impacts

  • Is there a record of complaints against the vendor from their employees or customers?
  • Is the vendor financially sound, with the resources to support your needs?
  • Has the vendor been cited for regulatory compliance issues in the past?
  • Does the vendor have a comprehensive list of their n-party vendor partners?
    • Are they willing to accept appropriate contractual protections regarding them?
  • Does the vendor self-audit, or do they use a vetted third-party audit firm to issue a SOC report annually?
  • Does the vendor operate in regions known for instability?
  • Is the vendor willing to make concessions on contractual protections, or are they only offering one-sided agreements with as-is warranties?

Prepare your vendor risk management for success

Due diligence will enable successful outcomes.

  1. Obtain top-level buy-in; it is critical to success.
  2. Build enterprise risk management (ERM) through incremental improvement.
  3. Focus initial efforts on the “big wins” to prove the process works.
  4. Use existing resources.
  5. Build on any risk management activities that already exist in the organization.
  6. Socialize ERM throughout the organization to gain additional buy-in.
  7. Normalize the process long term with ongoing updates and continuing education for the organization.
  8. (Adapted from COSO)

How to assess third-party risk

  1. Review organizational risks

    Understand the organizations risks to prepare for the “What If” game exercise.
  2. Identify and understand potential risks

    Play the “What If” game with the right people at the table.
  3. Create a risk profile packet for leadership

    Pull all the information together in a presentation document.
  4. Validate the risks

    Work with leadership to ensure that the proposed risks are in line with their thoughts.
  5. Plan to manage the risks

    Lower the overall risk potential by putting mitigations in place.
  6. Communicate the plan

    It is important not only to have a plan but also to socialize it in the organization for awareness.
  7. Enact the plan

    Once the plan is finalized and socialized, put it in place with continued monitoring for success.

Adapted from Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance

Insight summary

Risk impacts often come from unexpected places and have significant consequences.

Knowing who your vendors are using for their support and supply chain could be crucial in eliminating the risk of non-compliance for your organization.

Having a plan to identify and validate the regulatory compliance of your vendors is a must for any organization to avoid penalties.

Insight 1

Organizations’ strategic plans need to be adaptable to avoid vendors’ negative actions causing an expedited shift in priorities.

For example, Philips’ recall of ventilators impacted its products and the availability of its competitors’ products as demand overwhelmed the market.

Insight 2

Organizations often fail to understand how n-party vendors could place them in non-compliance.

Even if you know your complete third-party vendor landscape, you may not be aware of the downstream vendors in play. Ensure that you get visibility into this space as well, and hold your direct vendors accountable for the actions of their vendors.

Insight 3

Organizations need to know where their data lives and ensure it is protected.

Make sure you know which vendors are accessing/storing your data, where they are keeping it, and that you can get it back and have the vendors destroy it when the relationship is over. Without adequate protections throughout the lifecycle of the vendor, you could be monitoring for breaches in perpetuity.

Insight summary

Assessing financial impacts is an ongoing, educative, and collaborative multidisciplinary process that vendor management initiatives are uniquely designed to coordinate and manage for organizations.

Operational risk impacts often come from unexpected places and have unforeseen impacts. Knowing where your vendors place in critical business processes and those vendors' business continuity plans concerning your organization should be a priority for those managing the vendors.

Insight 4

Organizations need to learn how to assess the likelihood of potential risks in the rapidly changing online environments and recognize how their partnerships and subcontractors’ actions can affect their brand.

For example, do you understand how a simple news article raises your profile for short-term and long-term adverse events?

Insight 5

Organizations fail to plan for vendor acquisitions appropriately.

Vendors routinely get acquired in the IT space. Does your organization have appropriate safeguards from inadvertently entering a negative relationship? Do you have plans for replacing critical vendors purchased in such a manner?

Insight 6

Vendors are becoming more and more crucial to organizations’ overall operations, and most organizations have a poor understanding of the potential impacts they represent.

Is your vendor solvent? Do they have enough staff to accommodate your needs? Has their long-term planning been affected by changes in the market? Are they unique in their space?

Identifying vendor risk

Who should be included in the discussion?

  • While it is true that executive-level leadership defines the strategy for an organization, it is vital for those making decisions to make informed decisions.
  • Getting input from operational experts at your organization will enhance your business's long-term potential for success.
  • Involving those who directly manage vendors and understand the market will aid operational experts in determining the forward path for relationships with your current vendors and identifying emerging potential strategic partners.
  • Make sure security, risk, and compliance are all at the table. These departments all look at risk from different angles for the business and give valuable insight collectively.
  • Organizations have a wealth of experience in their marketing departments that can help identify real-world scenarios of negative actions.

See the blueprint Build an IT Risk Management Program

Review your risk management plans for new risks on a regular basis.

Keep in mind Risk =
Likelihood x Impact

(R=L*I).

Impact (I) tends to remain the same, while Likelihood (L) is becoming closer to 100% as threat actors become more prevalent.

Managing vendor risk impacts

How could your vendors impact your organization?

  • Review vendors’ downstream connections to understand thoroughly who you are in business with
  • Institute continuous vendor lifecycle management
  • Develop IT risk governance and change control
  • Introduce continual risk assessment to monitor the relevant vendor markets
  • Monitor and schedule contract renewals and new service/module negotiations
  • Perform business alignment meetings to reassess relationships
  • Ensure strategic alignment in contracts
  • Review vendors’ business continuity plans and disaster recovery testing
  • Re-evaluate corporate policies frequently
  • Monitor your company’s and associated vendors’ online presence
  • Be adaptable and allow for innovations that arise from the current needs
    • Capture lessons learned from prior incidents to improve over time, and adjust your plans accordingly

Organizations must review their risk appetite and tolerance levels, considering their complete landscape.

Changing regulations, acquisitions, new security issues, and events that affect global supply chains are current realities, not unlikely scenarios.

Ongoing Improvement

Incorporating lessons learned.

  • Over time, despite everyone’s best observations and plans, incidents will catch us off guard.
  • When that happens, follow your incident response plans and act accordingly.
  • An essential step is to document what worked and what did not – collectively known as the “lessons learned.”
  • Use the lessons learned document to devise, incorporate, and enact a better risk management process.

Sometimes disasters occur despite our best plans to manage them.

When this happens, it is important to document the lessons learned and improve our plans going forward.

The "what if" game

1-3 hours

Vendor management professionals are in an excellent position to help senior leadership identify and pull together resources across the organization to determine potential risks. By playing the "what if" game and asking probing questions to draw out – or eliminate – possible adverse outcomes, everyone involved adds their insight into parts of the organization to gather a comprehensive picture of potential impacts.

  1. Break into smaller groups (if too small, continue as a single group).
  2. Use the Comprehensive Risk Impact Tool to prompt discussion on potential risks. Keep this discussion flowing organically to explore all potentials but manage the overall process to keep the discussion pertinent and on track.
  3. Collect the outputs and ask the subject matter experts (SMEs) for management options for each one in order to present a comprehensive risk strategy. You will use this to educate senior leadership so that they can make an informed decision to accept or reject the solution.

Download the Comprehensive Risk Impact Tool

Input

  • List of identified potential risk scenarios scored by impact
  • List of potential mitigations of the scenarios to reduce the risk

Output

  • Comprehensive risk profile on the specific vendor solution

Materials

  • Whiteboard/flip charts
  • Comprehensive Risk Impact Tool to help drive discussion

Participants

  • Vendor Management – Coordinator
  • Organizational Leadership
  • Operations Experts (SMEs)
  • Business Process Experts
  • Legal/Compliance/Risk Manager

High risk example from tool

High risk example from Tool.  Shows sample questions to ask to identify impacts, their associated score, weight, and comments or notes.

Note: Even though a few items are “scored” they have not been added to the overall weight, signaling that the company has noted but does not necessarily hold them against the vendor.

How to mitigate:

  • Contractually insist that the vendor have a third-party security audit performed annually with the stipulation that they will not denigrate below your acceptable standards.
  • At renewal negotiate better contractual terms and protections for your organization.

Low risk example from tool

Low risk example from Tool.  Shows sample questions to ask to identify impacts, their associated score, weight, and comments or notes.

Summary

Seek to understand all potential risk impacts to better prepare your organization for success.

  • Organizations need to understand and map out their entire vendor landscape.
  • Understand where all your data lives and how you can control it throughout the vendor lifecycle.
  • Organizations need to be realistic about the likelihood of potential risks in the changing global world.
  • Those organizations that consistently follow their established risk-assessment and due-diligence processes are better positioned to avoid penalties.
  • Understand how your vendors prioritize your organization in their business continuity processes.
  • Bring the right people to the table to outline potential risks in the market and your organization.
  • Socialize the third-party vendor risk management process throughout the organization to heighten awareness and enable employees to help protect the organization.
  • Organizations need to learn how to assess the likelihood of potential risks in the changing global markets and recognize how their partnerships and subcontracts affect their brand.
  • Incorporate lessons learned from prior incidents into your risk management process to build better plans for future issues.

Organizations must evolve their risk assessments to be more meaningful to respond to global changes in the market.

Organizations should increase the resources dedicated to monitoring the market as regulatory agencies continue to hold them more and more accountable.

Bibliography

Olaganathan, Rajee. “Impact of COVID-19 on airline industry and strategic plan for its recovery with special reference to data analytics technology.” Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances, vol 7, no 1, 2021, pp. 033-046.

Tonello, Matteo. “Strategic Risk Management: A Primer for Directors.” Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, 23 Aug. 2012.

Frigo, Mark L., and Richard J. Anderson. “Embracing Enterprise Risk Management: Practical Approaches for Getting Started.” COSO, 2011.

Weak Cybersecurity is taking a toll on Small Businesses (tripwire.com)

SecureLink 2022 White Paper SL_Page_EA+PAM (rocketcdn.me)

Shared Assessments Member Poll March 2021 "Guide: Evolving Work Environments Impact of Covid-19 on Profile and Management of Third Parties“

“Cybersecurity only the tip of the iceberg for third-party risk management”. Help Net Security, April 21, 2021. Accessed: 2022-07-29.

“Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) Managed Services”. Deloitte, 2022. Accessed: 2022-07-29.

“The Future of TPRM: Third Party Risk Management Predictions for 2022”. OneTrust, December 20th2021. Accessed 2022-07-29.

“Third Party Vendor definition”. Law Insider, Accessed 2022-07-29.

“Third Party Risk”. AWAKE Security, Accessed 2022-07-29.

Glidden, Donna. "Don't Underestimate the Need to Protect Your Brand in Publicity Clauses", Info-Tech Research Group, June 2022.

Greenaway, Jordan. "Managing Reputation Risk: A start-to-finish guide", Transmission Private, July 2022. Accessed June 2022.

Jagiello, Robert D, and Thomas T Hills. “Bad News Has Wings: Dread Risk Mediates Social Amplification in Risk Communication. ”Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis vol. 38,10 (2018): 2193-2207.doi:10.1111/risa.13117

Kenton, Will. "Brand Recognition", Investopedia, August 2021. Accessed June 2022. Lischer, Brian. "How Much Does it Cost to Rebrand Your Company?", Ignyte, October 2017. Accessed June 2022.

"Powerful Examples of How to Respond to Negative Reviews", Review Trackers, February 2022. Accessed June 2022.

"The CEO Reputation Premium: Gaining Advantage in the Engagement Era", Weber Shadwick, March 2015. Accessed on June 2022.

"Valuation of Trademarks: Everything You Need to Know",UpCounsel, 2022. Accessed June 2022.

Related Info-Tech Research

Identify and Manage Financial Risk Impacts on Your Organization

  • Vendor management practices educate organizations on potential financial impacts that vendors may incur and suggest systems to help manage them.
  • Standardize your processes for identifying and monitoring vendor risks to manage financial impacts with our Financial Risk Impact Tool.

Identify and Manage Reputational Risk Impacts on Your Organization

  • Vendor management practices educate organizations on potential risks to vendors in your market and suggest creative and alternative ways to avoid and help manage them.
  • Standardize your processes for identifying and monitoring vendor risks to manage potential impacts on your reputation and brand with our Reputational Risk Impact Tool.

Identify and Manage Strategic Risk Impacts on Your Organization

  • Vendor management practices educate organizations on potential risks to vendors in your market and suggest creative and alternative ways to avoid and help manage them.
  • Standardize your processes for identifying and monitoring vendor risks to manage potential impacts on your strategic plan with our Strategic Risk Impact Tool.

Regulatory guidance and industry standards

Accelerate Business Growth and Valuation by Building Brand Awareness

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}569|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: N/A
  • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
  • member rating average days saved: N/A
  • Parent Category Name: Marketing Solutions
  • Parent Category Link: /marketing-solutions

Brands that fail to invest in brand awareness are likely to face some, if not all these problems:

  • Lack of brand visibility and recognition
  • Inability to reach and engage with the buyers
  • Difficulties generating and converting leads
  • Low customer retention rate
  • Inability to justify higher pricing
  • Limited brand equity, business valuation, and sustainability

Our Advice

Critical Insight

Awareness brings visibility and traction to brands, which is essential in taking the market leadership position and becoming the trusted brand that buyers think of first.

Brand awareness also significantly contributes to increasing brand equity, market valuation, and business sustainability.

Impact and Result

Building brand awareness allows for the increase of:

  • Brand visibility, perception, recognition, and reputation
  • Interactions and engagement with the target audience
  • Digital advertising performance and ROI
  • Conversion rates and sales wins
  • Revenue and profitability
  • Market share & share of voice (SOV)
  • Talents, partners, and investors attraction and retention
  • Brand equity, business growth, and market valuation

Accelerate Business Growth and Valuation by Building Brand Awareness Research & Tools

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Accelerate Business Growth and Valuation by Building Brand Awareness Storyboard - Learn how to establish the brand foundation, create assets and workflows, and deploy effective brand awareness strategies and tactics.

A two-step approach to building brand awareness, starting with defining the brand foundations and then implementing effective brand awareness strategies and tactics.

  • Accelerate Business Growth and Valuation by Building Brand Awareness Storyboard

2. Define Brand's Personality and Message - Analyze your target market and develop key elements of your brand guidelines.

With this set of tools, you will be able to capture and analyze your target market, your buyers and their journeys, define your brand's values, personality, and voice, and develop all the key elements of your brand guidelines to enable people within your organization and external resources to build a consistent and recognizable image across all assets and platforms.

  • Market Analysis Template
  • Brand Recognition Survey and Interview Questionnaire and List Template
  • External and Internal Factors Analysis Template
  • Buyer Personas and Journey Presentation Template
  • Brand Purpose, Mission, Vision, and Values Template
  • Brand Value Proposition and Positioning Statement
  • Brand Voice Guidelines Template
  • Writing Style Guide Template
  • Brand Messaging Template
  • Writer Checklist

3. Start Building Brand Awareness - Achieve strategic alignment.

These tools will allow you to achieve strategic alignment and readiness, create assets and workflows, deploy tactics, establish Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), and monitor and optimize your strategy on an ongoing basis.

  • Brand Awareness Strategy and Tactics Template
  • Asset Creation and Management List
  • Campaign Workflows Template
  • Brand Awareness Strategy Rollout Plan Template
  • Survey Emails Best Practices Guidelines

Infographic

Further reading

Accelerate Business Growth and Valuation By Building Brand Awareness

Develop and deploy comprehensive, multi-touchpoint brand awareness strategies to become the trusted brand that buyers think of first.

EXECUTIVE BRIEF

Analyst perspective

Building brand awareness

Achieving high brand awareness in a given market and becoming the benchmark for buyers

is what every brand wants to achieve, as it is a guarantee of success. Building brand awareness,

even though its immediate benefits are often difficult to see and measure, is essential for companies that want to stand out from their competitors and continue to grow in a sustainable way. The return on investment (ROI) may take longer, but the benefits are also greater than those achieved through short-term initiatives with the expectation of immediate, albeit often limited, results.

Brands that are familiar to their target market have greater credibility, generate more sales,

and have a more loyal customer base. CMOs that successfully execute brand awareness programs

build brand equity and grow company valuation.

This is a picture of Nathalie Vezina

Nathalie Vezina
Marketing Research Director
SoftwareReviews Advisory

Executive summary

Brand leaders know that brand awareness is essential to the success of all marketing and sales activities. Brands that fail to invest in brand awareness are likely to face some, if not all these problems:

  • Lack of brand visibility and compelling storytelling.
  • Inability to reach the target audience.
  • Low engagement on digital platforms and with ads.
  • Difficulties generating and converting leads, or closing/winning sales/deals, and facing a high cost per acquisition.
  • Low/no interest or brand recognition, trust level, and customer retention rate.
  • Inability to justify higher pricing.

Convincing stakeholders of the benefits of strong brand awareness can be difficult when the positive outcomes are hard to quantify, and the return on investment (ROI) is often long-term. Among the many obstacles brand leaders must overcome are:

  • Lack of longer-term corporate vision, focusing all efforts and resources on short-term growth strategies for a quick ROI.
  • Insufficient market and target buyers' information and understanding of the brand's key differentiator.
  • Misalignment of brand message, and difficulties creating compelling content that resonates with the target audience, generates interest, and keeps them engaged.
  • Limited or no resources dedicated to the development of the brand.

Inspired by top-performing businesses and best practices, this blueprint provides the guidance and tools needed to successfully build awareness and help businesses grow. By following these guidelines, brand leaders can expect to:

  • Gain market intelligence and a clear understanding of the buyer's needs, your competitive advantage, and key differentiator.
  • Develop a clear and compelling value proposition and a human-centric brand messaging driven by the brand's values.
  • Increase online presence and brand awareness to attract and engage with buyers.
  • Develop a long-term brand strategy and execution plan.

"A brand is the set of expectations, memories, stories, and relationships that, taken together, account for a consumer's decision to choose one product or service over another."

– Seth Godin

What is brand awareness?

The act of making a brand visible and memorable.

Brand awareness is the degree to which buyers are familiar with and recognize the attributes and image of a particular brand, product, or service. The higher the level of awareness, the more likely the brand is to come into play when a target audience enters the " buying consideration" phase of the buyer's journey.

Brand awareness also plays an important role in building equity and increasing business valuation. Brands that are familiar to their target market have greater credibility, drive more sales and have a more loyal customer base.
Building brand awareness allows increasing:

  • Brand visibility, perception, recognition, and reputation
  • Interactions and engagement with the target audience
  • Digital advertising performance and ROI
  • Conversion rates and sales wins
  • Revenue and profitability
  • Market share and share of voice (SOV)
  • Talents, partners, and investors attraction and retention
  • Brand equity, business growth, and market valuation

"Products are made in a factory, but brands are created in the mind."
Source: Walter Landor

Capitalizing on a powerful brand

A longer-term approach for an increased and more sustainable ROI.

Market leader position

Developing brand awareness is essential to increase the visibility and traction of a brand.

Several factors may cause a brand to be not well-known. One reason might be that the brand recently launched, such as a startup. Another reason could be that the brand has rebranded or entered a new market.

To become the trusted brand that buyers think of first in their target markets, it is critical for these brands to develop and deploy comprehensive, multi-touchpoint brand awareness strategies.

A relationship leading to loyalty

A longer-term brand awareness strategy helps build a strong relationship between the brand and the buyer, fostering a lasting and rewarding alliance.

It also enables brands to reach and engage with their target audience effectively by using compelling storytelling and meaningful content.

Adopting a more human-centric approach and emphasizing shared values makes the brand more attractive to buyers and can drive sales and gain loyalty.

Sustainable business growth

For brands that are not well established in their target market, short-term tactics that focus on immediate benefits can be ineffective. In contrast, long-term brand awareness strategies provide a more sustainable ROI (return on investment).

Investing in building brand awareness can impact a business's ability to interact with its target audience, generate leads, and increase sales. Moreover, it can significantly contribute to boosting the business's brand equity and market valuation.

"Quick wins may work in the short term, but they're not an ideal substitute for long-term tactics and continued success."
Source: Forbes

Impacts of low brand awareness on businesses

Unfamiliar brands, despite their strong potential, won't thrive unless they invest in their notoriety.

Brands that choose not to invest in longer-term awareness strategies and rely solely on short-term growth tactics in hopes of an immediate gain will see their ability to grow diminished and their longevity reduced due to a lack of market presence and recognition.

Symptoms of a weakening brand include:

  • High marketing spending and limited result
  • Low market share or penetration
  • Low sales, revenue, and gross margin
  • Weak renewal rate, customer retention, and loyalty
  • Difficulties delivering on the brand promise, low/no trust in the brand
  • Limited brand equity, business valuation, and sustainability
  • Unattractive brand to partners and investors

"Your brand is the single most important investment you can make in your business."
Source: Steve Forbes

Most common obstacles to increasing brand awareness

Successfully building brand awareness requires careful preparation and planning.

  • Limited market intelligence
  • Unclear competitive advantage/key differentiator
  • Misaligned and inconsistent messaging and storytelling
  • Lack of long-term vision
  • and low prioritization
  • Limited resources to develop and execute brand awareness building tactics
  • Unattractive content that does not resonate, generates little or no interest and engagement

Investing in the notoriety of the brand

Become the top-of-mind brand in your target market.

To stand out, be recognized by their target audience, and become major players in their industry, brands must adopt a winning strategy that includes the following elements:

  • In-depth knowledge and understanding of the market and audience
  • Strengthening digital presence and activities
  • Creating and publishing content relevant to the target audience
  • Reaching out through multiple touchpoints
  • Using a more human-centric approach
  • Ensure consistency in all aspects of the brand, across all media and channels

How far are you from being the brand buyers think of first in your target market?

This is an image of the Brand Awareness Pyramid.

Brand awareness pyramid

Based on David Aaker's brand loyalty pyramid

Tactics for building brand awareness

Focus on effective ways to gain brand recognition in the minds of buyers.

This is an image of the Brand Awareness Journey Roadmap.

Brand recognition requires in-depth knowledge of the target market, the creation of strong brand attributes, and increased presence and visibility.

Understand the market and audience you're targeting

Be prepared. Act smart.

To implement a winning brand awareness-building strategy, you must:

  • Be aware of your competitor's strengths and weaknesses, as well as yours.
  • Find out who is behind the keyboard, and the user experience they expect to have.
  • Plan and continuously adapt your tactics accordingly.
  • Make your buyer the hero.

Identify the brands' uniqueness

Find your "winning zone" and how your brand uniquely addresses buyers' pain points.

Focus on your key differentiator

A brand has found its "winning zone" or key differentiator when its value proposition clearly shows that it uniquely solves its buyers' specific pain points.

Align with your target audience's real expectations and successfully interact with them by understanding their persona and buyer's journey. Know:

  • How you uniquely address their pain points.
  • Their values and what motivates them.
  • Who they see as authorities in your field.
  • Their buying habits and trends.
  • How they like brands to engage with them.

An image of a Venn diagram between the following three terms: Buyer pain point; Competitors' value proposition; your unique value proposition.  The overlapping zone is labeled the Winning zone.  This is your key differentiator.

Give your brand a voice

Define and present a consistent voice across all channels and assets.

The voice reflects the personality of the brand and the emotion to be transmitted. That's why it's crucial to establish strict rules that define the language to use when communicating through the brand's voice, the type of words, and do's and don'ts.

To be recognizable it is imperative to avoid inconsistencies. No matter how many people are behind the brand voice, the brand must show a unique, distinctive personality. As for the tone, it may vary according to circumstances, from lighter to more serious.

Up to 80% Increased customer recognition when the brand uses a signature color scheme across multiple platforms
Source: startup Bonsai
23% of revenue increase is what consistent branding across channels leads to.
Source: Harvard Business Review

When we close our eyes and listen, we all recognize Ella Fitzgerald's rich and unique singing voice.

We expect to recognize the writing of Stephen King when we read his books. For the brand's voice, it's the same. People want to be able to recognize it.

Adopt a more human-centric approach

If your brand was a person, who would it be?

Human attributes

Physically attractive

  • Brand identity
  • Logo and tagline
  • Product design

Intellectually stimulating

  • Knowledge and ideas
  • Continuous innovation
  • Thought leadership

Sociable

  • Friendly, likeable and fun
  • Confidently engage with audience through multiple touchpoints
  • Posts and shares meaningful content
  • Responsive

Emotionally connected

  • Inspiring
  • Powerful influencer
  • Triggers emotional reactions

Morally sound

  • Ethical and responsible
  • Value driven
  • Deliver on its promise

Personable

  • Honest
  • Self-confident and motivated
  • Accountable

0.05 Seconds is what it takes for someone to form an opinion about a website, and a brand.
Source: 8ways

90% of the time, our initial gut reaction to products is based on color alone.
Source: startup Bonsai

56% of the final b2b purchasing decision is based on emotional factors.
Source: B@B International

Put values at the heart of the brand-buyers relationship

Highlight values that will resonate with your audience.

Brands that focus on the values they share with their buyers, rather than simply on a product or service, succeed in making meaningful emotional connections with them and keep them actively engaged.

Shared values such as transparency, sustainability, diversity, environmental protection, and social responsibility become the foundation of a solid relationship between a brand and its audience.

The key is to know what motivates the target audience.

86% of consumers claim that authenticity is one of the key factors they consider when deciding which brands they like and support.
Source: Business Wire

56% of the final decision is based on having a strong emotional connection with the supplier.
Source: B2B International

64% of today's customers are belief-driven buyers; they want to support brands that "can be a powerful force for change."
Source: Edelman

"If people believe they share values with a company, they will stay loyal to the brand."
– Howard Schultz
Source: Lokus Design

Double-down on digital

Develop your digital presence and reach out to your target audiences through multiple touchpoints.

Beyond engaging content, reaching the target audience requires brands to connect and interact with their audience in multiple ways so that potential buyers can form an opinion.

With the right message consistently delivered across multiple channels, brands increase their reach, create a buzz around their brand and raise awareness.

73% of today's consumers confirm they use more than one channel during a shopping journey
Source: Harvard Business Review

Platforms

  • Website and apps
  • Social media
  • Group discussions

Multimedia

  • Webinars
  • Podcasts
  • Publication

Campaign

  • Ads and advertising
  • Landing pages
  • Emails, surveys drip campaigns

Network

  • Tradeshows, events, sponsorships
  • Conferences, speaking opportunities
  • Partners and influencers

Use social media to connect

Reach out to the masses with a social media presence.

Social media platforms represent a cost-effective opportunity for businesses to connect and influence their audience and tell their story by posting relevant and search-engine-optimized content regularly on their account and groups. It's also a nice gateway to their website.

Building a relationship with their target buyer through social media is also an easy way for businesses to:

  • Understand the buyers.
  • Receive feedback on how the buyers perceive the brand and how to improve it.
  • Show great user experience and responsiveness.
  • Build trust.
  • Create awareness.

75% of B2B buyers and 84% of C-Suite executives use social media when considering a purchase
Source: LinkedIn Business

92% of B2B buyers use social media to connect with leaders in the sales industry.
Source: Techjury

With over 4.5 billion social media users worldwide, and 13 new users signing up to their first social media account every second, social media is fast becoming a primary channel of communication and social interaction for many.
Source: McKinsey

Become the expert subject matter

Raise awareness with thought leadership content.

Thought leadership is about building credibility
by creating and publishing meaningful, relevant content that resonates with a target audience.
Thought leaders write and publish all kinds of relevant content such as white papers, ebooks, case studies, infographics, video and audio content, webinars, and research reports.
They also participate in speaking opportunities, live presentations, and other high-visibility forums.
Well-executed thought leadership strategies contribute to:

  • Raise awareness.
  • Build credibility.
  • Be recognized as a subject expert matter.
  • Become an industry leader.

60% of buyers say thought leadership builds credibility when entering a new category where the brand is not already known.
Source: Edelman | LinkedIn

70% of people would rather learn about a company through articles rather than advertising.
Source: Brew Interactive

57% of buyers say that thought leadership builds awareness for a new or little-known brand.
Source: Edelman | LinkedIn

To achieve best results

  • Know the buyers' persona and journey.
  • Create original content that matches the persona of the target audience and that is close to their values.
  • Be Truthful and insightful.
  • Find the right tone and balance between being human-centric, authoritative, and bold.
  • Be mindful of people's attention span and value their time.
  • Create content for each phase of the buyer's journey.
  • Ensure content is SEO, keyword-loaded, and add calls-to-action (CTAs).
  • Add reason to believe, data to support, and proof points.
  • Address the buyers' pain points in a unique way.

Avoid

  • Focusing on product features and on selling.
  • Publishing generic content.
  • Using an overly corporate tone.

Promote personal branding

Rely on your most powerful brand ambassadors and influencers: your employees.

The strength of personal branding is amplified when individuals and companies collaborate to pursue personal branding initiatives that offer mutual benefits. By training and positioning key employees as brand ambassadors and industry influencers, brands can boost their brand awareness through influencer marketing strategies.

Personal branding, when well aligned with business goals, helps brands leverage their key employee's brands to:

  • Increase the organization's brand awareness.
  • Broaden their reach and circle of influence.
  • Show value, gain credibility, and build trust.
  • Stand out from the competition.
  • Build employee loyalty and pride.
  • Become a reference to other businesses.
  • Increase speaking opportunities.
  • Boost qualified leads and sales.

About 90% of organizations' employee network tends to be completely new to the brand.
Source: Everyone Social

8X more engagement comes from social media content shared by employees rather than brand accounts.
Source: Entrepreneur

561% more reach when brand messages are shared by employees on social media, than the same message shared by the Brand's social media.
Source: Entrepreneur

"Personal branding is the art of becoming knowable, likable and trustable."
Source: Founder Jar, John Jantsch

Invest in B2B influencer marketing

Broaden your reach and audiences by leveraging the voice of influencers.

Influencers are trusted industry experts and analysts who buyers can count on to provide reliable information when looking to make a purchase.

Influencer marketing can be very effective to reach new audiences, increase awareness, and build trust. But finding the right influencers with the level of credibility and visibility brands are expecting can sometimes be challenging.

Search for influencers that have:

  • Relevance of audience and size.
  • Industry expertise and credibility.
  • Ability to create meaningful content (written, video, audio).
  • Charismatic personality with values consistent with the brand.
  • Frequent publications on at least one leading media platform.

76% of people say that they trust content shared by people over a brand.
Source: Adweek


44% increased media mention of the brand using B2B influencer marketers.
Source: TopRank Marketing

Turn your customers into brand advocates

Establish customer advocacy programs and deliver a great customer experience.

Retain your customers and turn them into brand advocates by building trust, providing an exceptional experience, and most importantly, continuously delivering on the brand promise.

Implement a strong customer advocacy program, based on personalized experiences, the value provided, and mutual exchange, and reap the benefits of developing and growing long-term relationships.

92% of individuals trust word-of-mouth recommendations, making it one of the most trust-rich forms of advertising.
Source: SocialToaster

Word-of-mouth (advocacy) marketing increases marketing effectiveness by 54%
Source: SocialToaster

Make your brand known and make it stick in people's minds

Building and maintaining high brand awareness requires that each individual within the organization carry and deliver the brand message clearly and consistently across all media whether in person, in written communications, or otherwise.

To achieve this, brand leaders must first develop a powerful, researched narrative that people will embrace and convey, which requires careful preparation.

Target market and audience intel

  • Target market Intel
  • Buyer persona and journey/pain points
  • Uniqueness and positioning

Brand attributes

  • Values at the heart of the relationship
  • Brand's human attributes

Brand visibly and recall

  • Digital and social media presence
  • Thought leadership
  • Personal branding
  • Influencer marketing

Brand awareness building plan

  • Long-term awareness and multi-touchpoint approach
  • Monitoring and optimization

Short and long-term benefits of increasing brand awareness

Brands are built over the long term but the rewards are high.

  • Stronger brand perception
  • Improved engagement and brand associations
  • Enhanced credibility, reputation, and trust
  • Better connection with customers
  • Increased repeat business
  • High-quality leads
  • Higher and faster conversion rate
  • More sales closed/ deals won
  • Greater brand equity
  • Accelerated growth

"Strong brands outperform their less recognizable competitors by as much as 73%."
Source: McKinsey

Brand awareness building

Building brand awareness, even though immediate benefits are often difficult to see and measure, is essential for companies to stand out from their competitors and continue to grow in a sustainable way.

To successfully raise awareness, brands need to have:

  • A longer-term vision and strategy.
  • Market Intelligence, a clear value proposition, and key differentiator.
  • Consistent, well-aligned messaging and storytelling.
  • Digital presence and content.
  • The ability to reach out through multiple touchpoints.
  • Necessary resources.

Without brand awareness, brands become less attractive to buyers, talent, and investors, and their ability to grow, increase their market value, and be sustainable is reduced.

Brand awareness building methodology

Define brands' personality and message

  • Gather market intel and analyze the market.
  • Determine the value proposition and positioning.
  • Define the brand archetype and voice.
  • Craft a compelling brand message and story.
  • Get all the key elements of your brand guidelines.

Start building brand awareness

  • Achieve strategy alignment and readiness.
  • Create and manage assets.
  • Deploy your tactics, assets, and workflows.
  • Establish key performance indicators (KPIs).
  • Monitor and optimize on an ongoing basis.

Toolkit

  • Market and Influencing Factors Analysis
  • Recognition Survey and Best Practices
  • Buyer Personas and Journeys
  • Purpose, Mission, Vision, Values
  • Value Proposition and Positioning
  • Brand Message, Voice, and Writing Style
  • Brand Strategy and Tactics
  • Asset Creation and Management
  • Strategy Rollout Plan

Short and long-term benefits of increasing brand awareness

Increase:

  • Brand perception
  • Brand associations and engagement
  • Credibility, reputation, and trust
  • Connection with customers
  • Repeat business
  • Quality leads
  • Conversion rate
  • Sales closed / deals won
  • Brand equity and growth

It typically takes 5-7 brand interactions before a buyer remembers the brand.
Source: Startup Bonsai

Who benefits from this brand awareness research?

This research is being designed for:
Brand and marketing leaders who:

  • Know that brand awareness is essential to the success of all marketing and sales activities.
  • Want to make their brand unique, recognizable, meaningful, and highly visible.
  • Seek to increase their digital presence, connect and engage with their target audience.
  • Are looking at reaching a new segment of the market.

This research will also assist:

  • Sales with qualified lead generation and customer retention and loyalty.
  • Human Resources in their efforts to attract and retain talent.
  • The overall business with growth and increased market value.

This research will help you:

  • Gain market intelligence and a clear understanding of the target audience's needs and trends, competitive advantage, and key differentiator.
  • The ability to develop clear and compelling, human-centric messaging and compelling story driven by brand values.
  • Increase online presence and brand awareness activities to attract and engage with buyers.
  • Develop a long-term brand awareness strategy and deployment plan.

This research will help them:

  • Increase campaign ROI.
  • Develop a longer-term vision and benefits of investing in longer-term initiatives.
  • Build brand equity and increase business valuation.
  • Grow your business in a more sustainable way.

SoftwareReviews' brand awareness building methodology

Phase 1 Define brands' personality and message

Phase 2 Start building brand awareness

Phase steps

1.1 Gather market intelligence and analyze the market.

1.2 Develop and document the buyer's persona and journey.

1.3 Uncover the brand mission, vision statement, core values, value proposition and positioning.

1.4 Define the brand's archetype and tone of voice, then craft a compelling brand messaging.

2.1 Achieve strategy alignment and readiness.

2.2 Create assets and workflows and deploy tactics.

2.3 Establish key performance indicators (KPIs), monitor, and optimize on an ongoing basis.

Phase outcomes

  • Target market and audience are identified and documented.
  • A clear value proposition and positioning are determined.
  • The brand personality, voice, and messaging are developed.
  • All the key elements of the brand guidelines are in place and ready to use, along with the existing logo, typography, color palette, and imagery.
  • A comprehensive and actionable brand awareness strategy, with tactics, KPIs, and metrics, is set and ready to execute.
  • A progressive and effective deployment plan with deliverables, timelines, workflows, and checklists is in place.
  • Resources are assigned.

Insight summary

Brands to adapt their strategies to achieve longer-term growth
Brands must adapt and adjust their strategies to attract informed buyers who have access to a wealth of products, services, and brands from all over. Building brand awareness, even though immediate benefits are often difficult to see and measure, has become essential for companies that want to stand out from their competitors and continue to grow in a sustainable way.

A more human-centric approach
Brand personalities matter. Brands placing human values at the heart of the customer-brand relationship will drive interest in their brand and build trust with their target audience.

Stand out from the crowd
Brands that develop and promote a clear and consistent message across all platforms and channels, along with a unique value proposition, stand out from their competitors and get noticed.

A multi-touchpoints strategy
Engage buyers with relevant content across multiple media to address their pain points. Analyze touchpoints to determine where to invest your efforts.

Going social
Buyers expect brands to be active and responsive in their interactions with their audience. To build awareness, brands are expected to develop a strong presence on social media by regularly posting relevant content, engaging with their followers and influencers, and using paid advertising. They also need to establish thought leadership through content such as white papers, case studies, and webinars.

Thought leaders wanted
To enhance their overall brand awareness strategy, organizations should consider developing the personal brand of key executives. Thought leadership can be a valuable method to gain credibility, build trust, and drive conversion. By establishing thought leadership, businesses can increase brand mentions, social engagement, website traffic, lead generation, return on investment (ROI), and Net Promoter Score (NPS).

Save time and money with SoftwareReviews' branding advice

Collaborating with SoftwareReviews analysts for inquiries not only provides valuable advice but also leads to substantial cost savings during branding activities, particularly when partnering with an agency.

Guided Implementation Purpose Measured Value
Build brands' personality and message Get the key elements of the brand guidelines in place and ready to use, along with your existing logo, typography, color palette, and imagery, to ensure consistency and clarity across all brand touchpoints from internal communication to customer-facing materials. Working with SoftwareReviews analysts to develop brand guidelines saves costs compared to hiring an agency.

Example: Building the guidelines with an agency will take more or less the same amount of time and cost approximately $80K.

Start building brand awareness Achieve strategy alignment and readiness, then deploy tactics, assets, and other deliverables. Start building brand awareness and reap the immediate and long-term benefits.

Working with SoftwareReviews analysts and your team to develop a long-term brand strategy and deployment will cost you less than a fraction of the cost of using an agency.

Example: Developing and executing long-term brand awareness strategies with an agency will cost between $50-$75K/month over a 24-month period minimum.

Guided Implementation

What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

Phase 1

Build brands' personality and message

Phase 2

Start building brand awareness

  • Call #1: Discuss concept and benefits of building brand awareness. Identify key stakeholders. Anticipate concerns and objections.
  • Call #2: Discuss target market intelligence, information gathering, and analysis.
  • Call #3: Review market intelligence information. Address questions or concerns.
  • Call #4: Discuss value proposition and guide to find positioning and key differentiator.
  • Call #5: Review value proposition. Address questions or concerns.
  • Call #6: Discuss how to build a comprehensive brand awareness strategy using SR guidelines and template.
  • Call #7: Review strategy. Address questions or concerns.
  • Call #8: Second review of the strategy. Address questions or concerns.
  • Call #9 (optional): Third review of the strategy. Address questions or concerns.
  • Call #10: Discuss how to build the Execution Plan using SR template.
  • Call #11: Review Execution Plan. Address questions or concerns.
  • Call #12: Second review of the Execution Plan. Address questions or concerns.
  • Call #13 (optional): Third review of the Execution Plan. Address questions or concerns.
  • Call #14: Discuss how to build a compelling storytelling and content creation.
  • Call #15: Discuss website and social media platforms and other initiatives.
  • Call #16: Discuss marketing automation and continuous monitoring.
  • Call #17 (optional): Discuss optimization and reporting
  • Call #18: Debrief and determine how we can help with next steps.

A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with a SoftwareReviews Marketing Analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

Your engagement managers will work with you to schedule analyst calls.

Brand awareness building tools

Each step of this blueprint comes with tools to help you build brand awareness.

Brand Awareness Tool Kit

This kit includes a comprehensive set of tools to help you better understand your target market and buyers, define your brand's personality and message, and develop an actionable brand awareness strategy, workflows, and rollout plan.

The set includes these templates:
  • Market and Influencing Factors Analysis
  • Recognition Survey and Best Practices
  • Buyer Personas and Journeys
  • Purpose, Mission, Vision, and Values
  • Value Proposition and Positioning
  • Brand Message, Voice, and Writing Style
  • Brand Strategy and Tactics
  • Asset Creation and Management
  • Strategy Rollout Plan
An image of a series of screenshots from the templates listed in the column to the left of this image.

Get started!

Know your target market and audience, deploy well-designed strategies based on shared values, and make meaningful connections with people.

Phase 1

Define brands' personality and message

Phase 2

Start building brand awareness

Phase 1

Define brands' personality and message

Steps

1.1 Gather market intelligence and analyze the market.
1.2 Develop and document the buyer's persona and journey.
1.3 Uncover the brand mission, vision statement, core values, positioning, and value proposition.
1.4 Define the brand's archetype and tone of voice, then craft a compelling brand messaging.

Phase outcome

  • Target market and audience are identified and documented.
  • A clear value proposition and positioning are determined.
  • The brand personality, voice, and messaging are developed.
  • All the key elements of the brand guidelines are in place. and ready to use, along with the existing logo, typography, color palette, and imagery..

Build brands' personality and message

Step 1.1 Gather market intelligence and analyze the market.

Total duration: 2.5-8 hours

Objective

Analyze and document your competitive landscape, assess your strengths, weaknesses, opportunities,
and threats, gauge the buyers' familiarity with your brand, and identify the forces of influence.

Output

This exercise will allow you to understand your market and is essential to developing your value proposition.

Participants

  • Head of branding and key stakeholders

MarTech
May require you to:

  • Register to a Survey Platform.
  • Use, setup, or install platforms like CRM and/or Marketing Automation Platform.

Tools

1.1.1 SWOT and competitive landscape

(60-120 min.)

Analyze & Document

Follow the instructions in the Market Analysis Template to complete the SWOT and Competitive Analysis, slides 4 to 7.

1.1.3 Internal and External Factors

(30-60 min.)

Analyze

Follow the instructions in the External and Internal Factors Analysis Template to perform the PESTLE, Porter's 5 Forces, and Internal Factors and VRIO Analysis.

Transfer

Transfer key information into slides 10 and 11 of the Market Analysis Template.

Consult SoftwareReviews website to find the best survey and MarTech platforms or contact one of our analysts for more personalized assistance and guidance

1.1.2 Brand recognition

(60-300 min.)

Prep

Adapt the survey and interview questions in the Brand Recognition Survey Questionnaire and List Template.

Determine how you will proceed to conduct the survey and interviews (internal or external resources, and tools).

Refer to the Survey Emails Best Practices Guidelines for more information on how to conduct email surveys.

Collect & Analyze

Use the Brand Recognition Survey Questionnaire and List Template to build your list, conduct the survey /interviews, and collect and analyze the feedback received.

Transfer

Transfer key information into slides 8 and 9 of the Market Analysis Template.

Brand performance diagnostic

Have you considered diagnosing your brand's current performance before you begin building brand awareness?

Audit your brand using the Diagnose Brand Health to Improve Business Growth blueprint.Collect and interpret qualitative and quantitative brand performance measures.

The toolkit includes the following templates:

  • Surveys and interviews questions and lists
  • External and internal factor analysis
  • Digital and financial metrics analysis

Also included is an executive presentation template to communicate the results to key stakeholders and recommendations to fix the uncovered issues.

Build brands' personality and message

Step 1.2 Develop and document the buyer's persona and journey.

Total duration: 4-8 hours

Objective

Gather existing and desired customer insights and conduct market research to define and personify your buyers' personas and their buying behaviors.

Output

Provide people in your organization with clear direction on who your target buyers are and guidance on how to effectively reach and engage with them throughout their journey.
Participants

  • Head of branding
  • Key stakeholders from sales and product marketing

MarTech
May require you to:

  • Register to an Online Survey Platform (free version or subscription).
  • Use, setup, or installation of platforms like CRM and/or Marketing Automation Platform.

Tools

1.2.1 Buyer Personas and Journeys

(240-280 min.)

Research

Identify your tier 1 to 3 customers using the Ideal Client Profile (ICP) Workbook. (Recommended)

Survey and interview existing and desired customers based using the Buyer Persona and Journey Interview Guide and Data Capture Tool. (Recommended)

Create

Define and document your tier 1 to 3 Buyer Personas and Journeys using the Buyer Personas and Journeys Presentation Template.

Consult SoftwareReviews website to find the best survey platform for your needs or contact one of our analysts for more personalized assistance and guidance

Buyer Personas and Journeys

A well-defined buyer persona and journey is a great way for brands to ensure they are effectively reaching and engaging their ideal buyers through a personalized buying experience.

When properly documented, it provides valuable insights about the ideal customers, their needs, challenges, and buying decision processes allowing the development of initiatives that correspond to the target buyers.

Build brands' personality and message

Step 1.3 Uncover the brand mission, vision statement, core values, value proposition, and positioning.

Total duration: 4-5.5 hours

Objective
Define the "raison d'être" and fundamental principles of your brand, your positioning in the marketplace, and your unique competitive advantage.

Output
Allows everyone in an organization to understand and align with the brand's raison d'être beyond the financial dimension, its current positioning and objectives, and how it intends to achieve them.
It also serves to communicate a clear and appealing value proposition to buyers.

Participants

  • Head of branding
  • Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
  • Key stakeholders

Tools

  • Brand Purpose, Mission, Vision, and Values Template
  • Value Proposition and Positioning Statement Template

1.3.1 Brand Purpose, Mission, Vision, and Values

(90-120 min.)

Capture or Develop

Capture or develop, if not already existing, your brand's purpose, mission, vision statement, and core values using slides 4 to 7 of the Brand Purpose, Mission, Vision, and Values Template.

1.3.2 Brand Value Proposition and Positioning

(150-210 min.)

Define

Map the brand value proposition using the canvas on slide 5 of the Value Proposition and Positioning Statement Template, and clearly articulate your value proposition statement on slide 4.

Optional: Use canvas on slide 7 to develop product-specific product value propositions.

On slide 8 of the same template, develop your brand positioning statement.

Build brands' personality and message

Steps 1.4 Define the brand's archetype and tone of voice, and craft a compelling brand messaging.

Total duration: 5-8 hours

Objective

Define your unique brand voice and develop a set of guidelines, brand story, and messaging to ensure consistency across your digital and non-digital marketing and communication assets.
Output

A documented brand personality and voice, as well as brand story and message, will allow anyone producing content or communicating on behalf of your brand to do it using a unique and recognizable voice, and convey the right message.

Participants

  • Head of branding
  • Content specialist
  • Chief Executive Officer and other key stakeholders

Tools

  • Brand Voice Guidelines Template
  • Writing Style Guide Template
  • Brand Messaging Template
  • Writer Checklist Template

1.4.1 Brand Archetype and Tone of Voice

(120-240 min.)

Define and document

Refer to slides 5 and 6 of the Brand Voice Guidelines Template to define your brand personality (archetype), slide 7.

Use the Brand Voice Guidelines Template to define your brand tone of voice and characteristics on slides 8 and 9, based on the 4 primary tone of voice dimensions, and develop your brand voice chart, slide 9.

Set Rules

In the Writing Style Guide template, outline your brand's writing principles, style, grammar, punctuation, and number rules.

1.4.2 Brand Messaging

(180-240 min.)

Craft

Use the Brand Messaging template, slides 4 to 7, to craft your brand story and message.

Audit

Create a content audit to review and approve content to be created prior to publication, using the Writer's Checklist template.

Important Tip!

A consistent brand voice leads to remembering and trusting the brand. It should stand out from the competitors' voices and be meaningful to the target audience. Once the brand voice is set, avoid changing it.

Phase 2

Start building brand awareness

Steps

2.1 Achieve strategy alignment and readiness.
2.2 Create assets and workflows, and deploy tactics.
2.3 Establish key performance indicators (KPIs), monitor, and optimize on an ongoing basis.

Phase outcome

  • A comprehensive and actionable brand awareness strategy, with tactics, KPIs, and metrics, is set and ready to execute.
  • A progressive and effective deployment plan with deliverables, timelines, workflows, and checklists is in place.
  • Resources are assigned.

Start building brand awareness

Step 2.1 Achieve strategy readiness and alignment.

Total duration: 4-5 hours

Objective

Now that you have all the key elements of your brand guidelines in place, in addition to your existing logo, typography, color palette, and imagery, you can begin to build brand awareness.

Start planning to build brand awareness by developing a comprehensive and actionable brand awareness strategy with tactics that align with the company's purpose and objectives. The strategy should include achievable goals and measurables, budget and staffing considerations, and a good workload assessment.

Output

A comprehensive long-term, actionable brand awareness strategy with KPIs and measurables.

Participants

  • Head of branding
  • Key stakeholders

Tools

  • Brand Awareness Strategy and Tactics Template

2.1.1 Brand Awareness Analysis

(60-120 min.)

Identify

In slide 5 of the Brand Awareness Strategy and Tactics Template, identify your top three brand awareness drivers, opportunities, inhibitors, and risks to help you establish your strategic objectives in building brand awareness.

2.1.2 Brand Awareness Strategy

(60-120 min.)

Elaborate

Use slides 6 to 10 of the Brand Awareness Strategy and Tactics Template to elaborate on your strategy goals, key issues, and tactics to begin or continue building brand awareness.

2.1.3 Brand Awareness KPIs and Metrics

(180-240 min.)

Set

Set the strategy performance metrics and KPIs on slide 11 of the Brand Awareness Strategy and Tactics Template.

Monitor

Once you start executing the strategy, monitor and report each quarter using slides 13 to 15 of the same document.

Understanding the difference between strategies and tactics

Strategies and tactics can easily be confused, but although they may seem similar at times, they are in fact quite different.

Strategies and tactics are complementary.

A strategy is a plan to achieve specific goals, while a tactic is a concrete action or set of actions used to implement that strategy.

To be effective, brand awareness strategies should be well thought-out, carefully planned, and supported by a series of tactics to achieve the expected outcomes.

Start building brand awareness

Step 2.2 Create assets and workflows and deploy tactics.

Total duration: 3.5-4.5 hours

Objective

Build a long-term rollout with deliverables, milestones, timelines, workflows, and checklists. Assign resources and proceed to the ongoing development of assets. Implement, manage, and continuously communicate the strategy and results to key stakeholders.

Output

Progressive and effective development and deployment of the brand awareness-building strategy and tactics.

Participants

  • Head of branding

Tools

  • Asset Creation and Management List
  • Campaign Workflows Template
  • Brand Awareness Strategy Rollout Plan Template

2.2.1 Assets Creation List

(60-120 min.)

Inventory

Inventory existing assets to create the Asset Creation and Management List.

Assign

Assign the persons responsible, accountable, consulted, and informed of the development of each asset, using the RACI model in the template. Ensure you identify and collaborate with the right stakeholders.

Prioritize

Prioritize and add release dates.

Communicate

Update status and communicate regularly. Make the list with links to the assets available to the extended team to consult as needed.

2.2.2 Rollout Plan

(60-120 min.)

Inventory

Map out your strategy deployment in the Brand Awareness Strategy Rollout Plan Template and workflow in the Campaign Workflow Template.

Assign

Assign the persons responsible, accountable, consulted, and informed for each tactic, using the RACI model in the template. Ensure you identify and collaborate with the right stakeholders.

Prioritize

Prioritize and adjust the timeline accordingly.

Communicate

Update status and communicate regularly. Make the list with links to the assets available to the extended team to consult as needed.

Band Awareness Strategy Rollout Plan
A strategy rollout plan typically includes the following:

  • Identifying a cross-functional team and resources to develop the assets and deploy the tactics.
  • Listing the various assets to create and manage.
  • A timeline with key milestones, deadlines, and release dates.
  • A communication plan to keep stakeholders informed and aligned with the strategy and tactics.
  • Ongoing performance monitoring.
  • Constant adjustments and improvements to the strategy based on data collected and feedback received.

Start building brand awareness

Step 2.3 Establish key performance indicators (KPIs), monitor, and optimize on an ongoing basis.

Total duration: 3.5-4.5 hours

Objective

Brand awareness is built over a long period of time and must be continuously monitored in several ways. Measuring and monitoring the effectiveness of your brand awareness activities will allow you to constantly adjust your tactics and continue to build awareness.

Output

This step will provide you with a snapshot of your current level of brand awareness and interactions with the brand, and allow you to set up the tools for ongoing monitoring and optimization.

Participants

  • Head of branding
  • Digital marketing manager

MarTech
May require you to:

  • Register to an Online Survey Platform(free version or subscription), or
  • Use, setup, or installation of platforms like CRM and/or Marketing Automation Platform.
  • Use Google Analytics or other tracking tools.
  • Use social media and campaign management tools.

Tools

  • Brand Awareness Strategy and Tactics Template

2.2.2 Rollout Plan

(60-120 min.)

Measure

Monitor and record the strategy performance metrics in slides 12 to 15 of the Brand Awareness Strategy and Tactics template, and gauge its performance against preset KPIs in slide 11. Make ongoing improvements to the strategy and assets.

Communicate

The same slides in which you monitor strategy performance can be used to report on the results of the current strategy to key stakeholders on a monthly or quarterly basis, as appropriate.

Take this opportunity to inform stakeholders of any adjustments you plan to make to the existing plan to improve its performance. Since brand awareness is built over time, be sure to evaluate the results based on how long the strategy has been in place before making major changes.

Consult SoftwareReviews website to find the best survey, brand monitoring and feedback, and MarTech platforms, or contact one of our analysts for more personalized assistance and guidance

Measuring brand strategy performance
There are two ways to measure and monitor your brand's performance on an ongoing basis.

  • By registering to brand monitoring and feedback platforms and tools like Meltwater, Hootsuite, Insights, Brand24, Qualtrics, and Wooltric.
  • Manually, using native analytics built in the platforms you're already using, such as Google and Social Media Analytics, or by gathering customer feedback through surveys, or calculating CAC, ROI, and more in spreadsheets.

SoftwareReviews can help you choose the right platform for your need. We also equip you with manual tools, available with the Diagnose Brand Health to Improve Business Growthblueprint to measure:

  • Surveys and interviews questions and lists.
  • External and internal factor analysis.
  • Digital and financial metrics analysis.
  • Executive presentation to report on performance.

Related SoftwareReviews research

An image of the title page for SoftwareReviews Create a Buyer Persona and Journey. An image of the title page for SoftwareReviews Diagnose Brand Health to Improve Business Growth.

Create a Buyer Persona and Journey

Get deeper buyer understanding and achieve product-market fit, with easier access to market and sales

  • Reduce time and resources wasted chasing the wrong prospects.
  • Increase open and click-through rates.
  • Perform more effective sales discovery.
  • Increase win rate.

Diagnose Brand Health to Improve Business Growth

Have a significant and well-targeted impact on business success and growth by knowing how your brand performs, identifying areas of improvement, and making data-driven decisions to fix them.

  • Increase brand awareness and equity.
  • Build trust and improve customer retention and loyalty.
  • Achieve higher and faster growth.

Bibliography

Aaker, David. "Managing Brand Equity." Simon & Schuster, 1991.
"6 Factors for Brands to Consider While Designing Their Communication." Lokus Design, 23 Sept. 2022.
"20 Advocacy Marketing Statistics You Need to Know." Social Toaster, n.d.
Bazilian, Emma. "How Millennials and Baby Boomers Consume User-Generated Content And what brands can learn from their preferences." Adweek, January 2, 2017.
B2B International, a Gyro: company, B2B Blog - Why Human-To-Human Marketing Is the Next Big Trend in a Tech-Obsessed World.
B2B International, a Gyro: company, The State of B2B Survey 2019 - Winning with Emotions: How to Become Your Customer's First Choice.
Belyh, Anastasia. "Brand Ambassador 101:Turn Your Personal Brand into Cash." Founder Jar, December 6, 2022.
Brand Master Academy.com.
Businesswire, a Berkshire Hathaway Company, "Stackla Survey Reveals Disconnect Between the Content Consumers Want & What Marketers Deliver." February 20, 2019.
Chamat, Ramzi. "Visual Design: Why First Impressions Matter." 8 Ways, June 5, 2019.
Cognism. "21 Tips for Building a LinkedIn Personal Brand (in B2B SaaS)."
Curleigh, James. "How to Enhance and Expand a Global Brand." TED.
"2019 Edelman Trust Barometer." Edelman.
Erskine, Ryan. "22 Statistics That Prove the Value of Personal Branding." Entrepreneur, September 13, 2016.
Forbes, Steve. "Branding for Franchise Success: How To Achieve And Maintain Brand Consistency Across A Franchise Network?" Forbes, 9 Feb. 2020.
Godin, Seth. "Define: Brand." Seth's Blog, 30 Dec. 2009,
Houragan, Stephen. "Learn Brand Strategy in 7 Minutes (2023 Crash Course)." YouTube.
Jallad, Revecka. "To Convert More Customers, Focus on Brand Awareness." Forbes, October 22, 2019.
Kingsbury, Joe, et al. "2021 B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study." Edelman, 2021.
Kunsman, Todd. "The Anatomy of an Employee Influencer." EveryoneSocial, September 8, 2022.
Landor, Walter. A Brand New World: The Fortune Guide to the 21st Century. Time Warner Books, 1999.
Liedke, Lindsay. "37+ Branding Statistics For 2023: Stats, Facts & Trends." Startup Bonsai, January 2, 2023.
Millman, Debbie. "How Symbols and Brands Shape our Humanity." TED, 2019.
Nenova, Velina. "21 Eye-Opening B2B Marketing Statistics to Know in 2023." Techjury, February 9, 2023.
Perrey, Jesko et al., "The brand is back: Staying relevant in an accelerating age." McKinsey & Company, May 1, 2015.
Schaub, Kathleen. "Social Buying Meets Social Selling: How Trusted Networks Improve the Purchase Experience." LinkedIn Business, April 2014.
Sopadjieva, Emma et al. "A Study of 46,000 Shoppers Shows That Omnichannel Retailing Works." Harvard Business Review, January 3, 2017.
Shaun. "B2B Brand Awareness: The Complete Guide 2023." B2B House. 2023.
TopRank Marketing, "2020 State of B2B Influencer Marketing Research Report." Influencer Marketing Report.

Structure the Role of the DBA

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}273|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: N/A
  • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
  • member rating average days saved: N/A
  • Parent Category Name: Business Intelligence Strategy
  • Parent Category Link: /business-intelligence-strategy
  • The traditional role of Database Administrators (DBAs) is shifting due to a variety of changes such as cloud databases, increased automation, close relations with development, and the need for more integration with the business at large. All this means that organizations will have to adapt to integrate a new type of DBA into IT.
  • Organizations often have difficulty establishing a refined and effective DBA structure based on repeatable and well-grounded processes.
  • The relationship between DBAs and the rest of IT (especially development) can often be problematic due to a lack of mutual co-operation and clear communication.
  • There is often confusion in organizations as how to approach staffing DBAs.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • An organization’s relative focus on operations or development is essential in determining many DBA related decisions. This focus can determine what kinds of DBAs to hire, what staffing ratios to use, the viability of outsourcing, and the appropriate reporting structure for DBAs.
  • Utilizing technological strategies such as database automation, effective auditing, and database consolidation to bolster the DBA team helps make efficient use of DBA staff and can turn a reactive environment into a proactive one.
  • Ensuring refined and regularly assessed processes are in place for change and incident management is essential for maintaining effective and structured database administration.

Impact and Result

  • Right-size, support, and structure your DBA team for increased cost effectiveness and optimal productivity.
  • Develop a superior level of co-operation between DBAs and the rest of IT as well as the business at large.
  • Build an environment in which DBAs will be motivated and flourish.

Structure the Role of the DBA Research & Tools

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Understand how Database Administrators are evolving

Develop an effective structure for managing and supporting Database Administrators.

  • Storyboard: Structure the Role of the DBA

2. Create the right Database Administrator roles to meet organizational needs

Build a team that is relevant to the focus of the organization.

  • System Database Administrator
  • Application Database Administrator
[infographic]

Build Your BizDevOps Playbook

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}177|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: N/A
  • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
  • member rating average days saved: N/A
  • Parent Category Name: Architecture & Strategy
  • Parent Category Link: /architecture-and-strategy
  • Today’s rapidly scaling and increasingly complex products create mounting pressure on delivery teams to release new features and changes quickly and with sufficient quality.
  • Many organizations see BizDevOps as a solution to help meet this demand. However, they often lack the critical cross-functional collaboration and team-sport culture that are critical for success.
  • The industry provides little consensus and guidance on how to prepare for the transition to BizDevOps.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • BizDevOps is cultural, not driven by tools. It is about delivering high-quality and valuable releases to stakeholders through collective ownership, continuous collaboration, and team-first behaviors supported by tools.
  • BizDevOps begins with a strong foundation in five key areas. The crux of successful BizDevOps is centered on the strategic adoption and optimization of building great requirements, collaborative practices, iterative delivery, application management, and high-fidelity environments.
  • Teams take STOCK of what it takes to collaborate effectively. Teams and stakeholders must show up, trust the delivery method and people, orchestrate facilitated activities, clearly communicate and knowledge share every time they collaborate.

Impact and Result

  • Bring the right people to the table. BizDevOps brings significant organizational, process and technology changes to improve delivery effectiveness. Include the key roles in the definition and validation of your BizDevOps vision and practices.
  • Focus on the areas that matter. Review your current circumstances and incorporate the right practices that addresses your key challenges and blockers to becoming BizDevOps.
  • Build your BizDevOps playbook. Gain a broad understanding of the key plays and practices that makes a successful BizDevOps organization. Verify and validate these practices in order to tailor them to your context. Keep your playbook live.

Build Your BizDevOps Playbook Research & Tools

Start here – read the Executive Brief

Find out why you should implement BizDevOps, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Get started with BizDevOps

Set the right expectations with your stakeholders and define the context of your BizDevOps implementation.

  • Build Your BizDevOps Playbook – Phase 1: Get Started With BizDevOps
  • BizDevOps Playbook

2. Tailor your BizDevOps playbook

Tailor the plays in your BizDevOps playbook to your circumstances and vision.

  • Build Your BizDevOps Playbook – Phase 2: Tailor Your BizDevOps Playbook
[infographic]

Workshop: Build Your BizDevOps Playbook

Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

1 Set Your Expectations

The Purpose

Discuss the goals of your BizDevOps playbook.

Identify the various perspectives who should be included in the BizDevOps discussion.

Level set expectations of your BizDevOps implementation.

Key Benefits Achieved

Identification of the key roles who should be included in the BizDevOps discussion.

Learning of key practices to support your BizDevOps vision and goals.

Your vision of BizDevOps in your organization.

Activities

1.1 Define BizDevOps.

1.2 Understand your key stakeholders.

1.3 Define your objectives.

Outputs

Your BizDevOps definition

List of BizDevOps stakeholders

BizDevOps vision and objectives

2 Set the Context

The Purpose

Understand the various methods to initiate the structuring of facilitated collaboration.

Share a common way of thinking and behaving with a set of principles.

Focus BizDevOps adoption on key areas of software product delivery.

Key Benefits Achieved

A chosen collaboration method (Scrum, Kanban, Scrumban) to facilitate collaboration

A mutually understanding and beneficial set of guiding principles

Areas where BizDevOps will see the most benefit

Activities

2.1 Select your foundation method.

2.2 Define your guiding principles.

2.3 Focus on the areas that matter.

Outputs

Chosen collaboration model

List of guiding principles

High-level assessment of delivery practices and its fit for BizDevOps

3 Tailor Your BizDevOps Playbook

The Purpose

Review the good practices within Info-Tech’s BizDevOps Playbook.

Tailor your playbook to reflect your circumstances.

Key Benefits Achieved

Understanding of the key plays involved in product delivery

Product delivery plays that reflect the challenges and opportunities of your organization and support your BizDevOps vision

Activities

3.1 Review and tailor the plays in your playbook

Outputs

High-level discussion of key product delivery plays and its optimization to support BizDevOps

Create an Agile-Friendly Project Gating and Governance Approach

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}162|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: 9.0/10 Overall Impact
  • member rating average dollars saved: $33,499 Average $ Saved
  • member rating average days saved: 57 Average Days Saved
  • Parent Category Name: Development
  • Parent Category Link: /development
  • Organizations often apply gating and governance to IT projects to ensure resources are being used efficiently and effectively.
  • Agile project teams often complain that traditional project gating and governance interfere with their ability to delivery because traditional gating and governance were designed for Waterfall delivery methods.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

Imposing a traditional gating and governance approach on an Agile project can eliminate the advantages that Agile delivery methods offer. Make sure to rework your traditional project gating and governance approach to be Agile friendly.

Impact and Result

  • Create a project gating and governance approach that is Agile friendly and helps your organization realize the most benefit from its Agile transformation.
  • Oversee your Agile projects with confidence by adjusting the level of support and oversight they receive based on their Agilometer score.
  • Define a revised set of project gating artifacts that support Agile delivery methods.
  • Adopt a “trust but verify” approach to Agile project gating that will reduce risk and help ensure value delivery.

Create an Agile-Friendly Project Gating and Governance Approach Research & Tools

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Create an Agile-Friendly Project Gating and Governance Approach Deck – A step-by-step guide to creating an Agile-friendly project gating and governance approach that will support Agile delivery methods in your organization.

This deck is a guide to creating your own Agile-friendly project gating and governance approach using Info-Tech’s Agile Gating Framework.

  • Create an Agile-Friendly Project Gating and Governance Approach – Phases 1-3

2. Your Gates 3 and 3A Checklists – The Gates 3 and 3A Checklists are used to determine when a project is ready to enter and exit the Risk Reduction & Value Confirmation phase.

Modify Info-Tech’s Gates 3 and 3A Checklists to meet your organization’s needs, and then use them to determine when Agile projects are ready to enter and exit the RRVC phase.

  • Gates 3 and 3A Checklists

3. Your Agilometer – The Agilometer is used to determine a project’s readiness to use an Agile delivery method.

Modify Info-Tech’s Agilometer to meet your organization’s needs, and then use it to determine the level of support and oversight the project will need.

  • Agilometer

4. Your Agile Project Status Report – An Agile Status Report will be used to monitor project progress.

Modify Info-Tech’s Agile Project Status Report to meet your organization’s needs, and then use it to monitor in-flight Agile projects.

  • Agile Project Status Report

5. Project Burndown Chart – A tool to let you monitor project burndown over time.

Use Info-Tech’s Project Burndown Chart to monitor the progress of your in-flight Agile projects.

  • Project Burndown Chart

6. Traditional to Agile Gating Artifact Mapping – A tool to help you rework your project gating artifacts to be Agile-friendly.

Use Info-Tech’s Traditional to Agile Gating Artifact Mapping tool to modify your gating artifacts for Agile projects.

  • Traditional to Agile Gating Artifact Mapping
[infographic]

Further reading

Create an Agile-Friendly Project Gating and Governance Approach

Use Info-Tech’s Agile Gating Framework as a guide to gating your Agile projects using a “trust but verify” approach.

Table of Contents

Analyst Perspective

Executive Summary

Phase 1: Establish Your Gating and Governance Purpose

Phase 2: Understand and Adapt Info-Tech’s Agile Gating Framework

Phase 3: Complete Your Agile Gating Framework

Where Do I Go Next?

Bibliography

Facilitator Slides

Analyst Perspective

Make your gating and governance process Agile friendly by following a “trust but verify” approach

Most project gating and governance approaches are designed for traditional (Waterfall) delivery methods. However, Agile delivery methods call for a different way of working that doesn’t align well with these approaches.

Applying traditional project gating and governance to Agile projects is like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. Not only will it make Agile project delivery less efficient, but in the extreme, it can lead to outright project failure and even derail your organization’s Agile transformation.

If you want Agile to successfully take root in your organization, be prepared to rethink your current gating and governance practices. This document presents a framework that you can use to rework your approach to provide both effective oversight and support for your Agile projects.

Photo of Alex Ciraco, Principal Research Director, Application Delivery and Management, Info-Tech Research Group. Alex Ciraco
Principal Research Director,
Application Delivery and Management
Info-Tech Research Group

Executive Summary

Your Challenge
  • Many government organizations are adopting Agile project delivery methods because they have proven to be more effective than traditional delivery approaches at responding to today’s fast pace of change.
  • Government organizations have an obligation to govern projects to ensure effective use of public resources, regardless of the delivery method being used.
Common Obstacles
  • Most government gating and governance frameworks were designed around traditional (often called “Waterfall”) delivery methods.
  • Agile and Waterfall work in completely different ways, so imposing traditional gating and governance frameworks on Agile projects will stifle progress and can even lead to project failure.
  • Government organizations must adjust their gating and governance frameworks to accommodate Agile delivery methods.
Info-Tech’s Approach
  • Begin by understanding the fundamental purpose of project gating and governance.
  • Next, understand the major differences between Agile and Waterfall delivery methods.
  • Then, armed with this knowledge, use Info-Tech’s Agile Gating Framework to redefine your gating and governance approach to be Agile friendly.
Info-Tech Insight

Imposing a traditional governance approach on an Agile project can eliminate the advantages that Agile delivery methods offer. Make sure to rework your project gating and governance approach to be Agile friendly.

Info-Tech’s methodology for Creating an Agile-Friendly Project Gating and Governance Approach

1. Establish Your Gating and Governance Purpose 2. Understand and Adapt Info-Tech’s Agile Gating Framework 3. Complete your Agile Gating Framework
Phase Steps

1.1 Understand How We Gate and Govern Projects

1.2 Compare Traditional to Agile Delivery

1.3 Realize What Traditional Gating Looks Like and Why

2.1 Understand How Agile Manages Risk and Ensures Value Delivery

2.2 Introducing Info-Tech’s Agile Gating Framework

2.3 Create Your Agilometer

2.4 Create an Agile-Friendly Project Status Report

2.5 Select Your Agile Health Check Tool

3.1 Map Your Traditional Gating Artifacts to Agile Delivery

3.2 Determine Your Now, Next, Later Roadmap for Implementation

Phase Outcomes
  1. Your gating/governance purpose statement
  2. A fundamental understanding of the difference between traditional and Agile delivery methods.
  1. An understanding of Info-Tech’s Agile Gating Framework
  2. Your Gates 3 and 3A checklists
  3. Your Agilometer tool
  4. Your Agile project status report template
  5. Your Agile health check tool
  1. Artifact map for your Agile gating framework
  2. Roadmap for Agile gating implementation

Key Deliverables

Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals, including:

Agilometer Tool

Create your customized Agilometer tool to determine project support and oversight needs.
Sample of the 'Agilometer Tool' deliverable.

Gates 3 and 3A Checklists

Create your customized checklists for projects at Gates 3 and 3A.
Sample of the 'Gates 3 and 3A Checklists' deliverable.

Agile-Friendly Project Status Report

Create your Agile-friendly project status report to monitor progress.
Sample of the 'Agile-Friendly Project Status Report' deliverable.

Artifact Mapping Tool

Map your traditional gating artifacts to their Agile replacements.
Sample of the 'Artifact Mapping Tool' deliverable.

Create an Agile-Friendly Project Gating and Governance Approach

Phase 1

Establish your gating and governance purpose

Phase 1

1.1 Understand How We Gate and Govern Projects

1.2 Compare Traditional to Agile Delivery

1.3 Realize What Traditional Gating Looks Like And Why

Phase 2

2.1 Understand How Agile Manages Risk and Ensures Value Delivery

2.2 Introducing Info-Tech’s Agile Gating Framework

2.3 Create Your Agilometer

2.4 Create Your Agile-Friendly Project Status Report

2.5 Select Your Agile Health Check Tool

Phase 3

3.1 Map Your Traditional Gating Artifacts to Agile Delivery

3.2 Determine Your Now, Next, Later Roadmap for Implementation

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

  • Understand why gating and governance are so important to your organization.
  • Compare and contrast traditional to Agile delivery.
  • Identify what form traditional gating takes in your organization.

This phase involves the following participants:

  • PMO/Gating Body
  • Delivery Managers
  • Delivery Teams
  • Other Interested Parties

Agile gating–related facts and figures

73% of organizations created their project gating framework before adopting or considering Agile delivery practices. (Athens Journal of Technology and Engineering)

71% of survey respondents felt an Agile-friendly gating approach improves both productivity and product quality. (Athens Journal of Technology and Engineering)

Moving to an Agile-friendly gating approach has many benefits:
  • Faster response to change
  • Improved productivity
  • Higher team morale
  • Better product quality
  • Faster releases
(Journal of Product Innovation Management)

Traditional gating approaches can undermine an Agile project

  • Most existing gating and governance frameworks (often referred to as phase-gate) impose requirements on projects that are anti-patterns to an Agile delivery approach
  • For example, any gating approach that requires a project to deliver a detailed requirements document before coding can begin will make it difficult or impossible for the project to use an Agile delivery method.
  • The same can be said for other common phase-gate requirements including:
    • Imposing a formal (and onerous) change control process on project requirements.
    • Requiring a detailed design document and/or detailed user acceptance test plan at the beginning of the project.
    • Asking the project to produce a detailed project plan.
(DZone)
Don’t make the mistake of asking an Agile project to follow a traditional phase-gate approach to project delivery!

Before reworking your gating approach, you need to consider two important questions

Answering these questions will help guide your new gating process to both be Agile friendly and meet your organization’s needs

  1. What is the fundamental purpose of gating? By examining the fundamental purpose of gating, you will be better able to adjust your approach to achieve the desired outcomes in an Agile context.
  2. How does Agile delivery differ from traditional? By understanding how Agile delivery differs from traditional, you will be better able to adjust your gating approach to support Agile delivery methods.

Stock image of speech bubbles hanging on string with a question mark and lightbulb drawn on them.

Identify and Reduce Agile Contract Risk

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}232|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: 8.0/10 Overall Impact
  • member rating average dollars saved: $10,000 Average $ Saved
  • member rating average days saved: 20 Average Days Saved
  • Parent Category Name: Vendor Management
  • Parent Category Link: /vendor-management
  • Customer maturity levels with Agile are low, with 67% of organizations using Agile for less than five years.
  • Customer competency levels with Agile are also low, with 84% of organizations stating they are below a high level of competency.
  • Contract disputes are the number one or two types of disputes faced by organizations across all industries.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • Agile contracts require different wording and protections than traditional or waterfall contracts.
  • Agile buzzwords by themselves do not create an Agile contract.
  • There is a delicate balance between being overly prescriptive in an Agile contract and too lax.

Impact and Result

  • Identify options for Agile contract provisions.
  • Manage Agile contract risk by selecting the appropriate level of protections for an Agile project.
  • Harness the power of Agile development and collaboration with the vendor while preserving contractual flexibility.
  • Focus on the correct contract clauses to manage Agile risk.

Identify and Reduce Agile Contract Risk Research & Tools

Start here – read the Executive Brief

Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should treat Agile contracts differently from traditional or waterfall contracts, and review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the twelve contract clauses that are different for Agile contracts.

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Identify and evaluate options

Use the information in this blueprint and Info-Tech’s Agile Contract Playbook-Checklist to review and assess your Agile contracts, ensuring that the provisions and protections are suitable for Agile contracts specifically.

  • Agile Contracts Playbook-Checklist
[infographic]

Workshop: Identify and Reduce Agile Contract Risk

Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

1 Identify and Evaluate Options

The Purpose

To understand Agile-specific contract clauses, to improve risk identification, and to be more effective at negotiating Agile contract terms.

Key Benefits Achieved

Increased awareness of how Agile contract provisions are different from traditional or waterfall contracts in 12 key areas.

Understanding available options.

Understanding the impact of being too prescriptive.

Activities

1.1 Review the Agile Contract Playbook-Checklist.

1.2 Review 12 contract provisions and reinforce key learnings with exercises.

Outputs

Configured Playbook-Checklist as applicable

Exercise results and debrief

Present Security to Executive Stakeholders

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}262|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
  • member rating average dollars saved: $2,000 Average $ Saved
  • member rating average days saved: 10 Average Days Saved
  • Parent Category Name: Governance, Risk & Compliance
  • Parent Category Link: /governance-risk-compliance
  • There is a disconnect between security leaders and executive stakeholders on what information is important to present.
  • Security leaders find it challenging to convey the necessary information to obtain support for security objectives.
  • Changes to the threat landscape and shifts in organizational goals exacerbate the issue, as they impact security leaders' ability to prioritize topics to be communicated.
  • Security leaders struggle to communicate the importance of security to a non-technical audience.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

Security presentations are not a one-way street. The key to a successful executive security presentation is having a goal for the presentation and ensuring that you have met your goal.

Impact and Result

  • Developing a thorough understanding of the security communication goals.
  • Understanding the importance of leveraging highly relevant and understandable data.
  • Developing and delivering presentations that will keep your audience engaged and build trust with your executive stakeholders.

Present Security to Executive Stakeholders Research & Tools

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Present Security to Executive Stakeholders – A step-by-step guide to communicating security effectively to obtain support from decision makers.

Use this as a guideline to assist you in presenting security to executive stakeholders.

  • Present Security to Executive Stakeholders Storyboard

2. Security Presentation Templates – A set of security presentation templates to assist you in communicating security to executive stakeholders.

The security presentation templates are a set of customizable templates for various types of security presentation including:

  • Present Security to Executive Stakeholders Templates

Infographic

Further reading

Present Security to Executive Stakeholders

Learn how to communicate security effectively to obtain support from decision makers.

Analyst Perspective

Build and deliver an effective security communication to your executive stakeholders.

Ahmad Jowhar

As a security leader, you’re tasked with various responsibilities to ensure your organization can achieve its goals while its most important assets are being protected.

However, when communicating security to executive stakeholders, challenges can arise in determining what topics are pertinent to present. Changes in the security threat landscape coupled with different business goals make identifying how to present security more challenging.

Having a communication framework for presenting security to executive stakeholders will enable you to effectively identify, develop, and deliver your communication goals while obtaining the support you need to achieve your objectives.

Ahmad Jowhar
Research Specialist, Security & Privacy

Info-Tech Research Group

Executive Summary

Your Challenge

Common Obstacles

Info-Tech’s Approach

  • Many security leaders struggle to decide what to present and how to present security to executive stakeholders.
  • Constant changes in the security threat landscape impacts a security leader’s ability to prioritize topics to be communicated.
  • There is a disconnect between security leaders and executive stakeholders on what information is important to present.
  • Security leaders struggle to communicate the importance of security to a non-technical audience.
  • Developing a thorough understanding of security communication goals.
  • Understanding the importance of leveraging highly relevant and understandable data.
  • Developing and delivering presentations that will keep your audience engaged and build trust with your executive stakeholders.

Info-Tech Insight

Security presentations are not a one-way street. The key to a successful executive security presentation is having a goal for the presentation and verifying that you have met your goal.

Your challenge

As a security leader, you need to communicate security effectively to executive stakeholders in order to obtain support for your security objectives.

  • When it comes to presenting security to executive stakeholders, many security leaders find it challenging to convey the necessary information in order to obtain support for security objectives.
  • This is attributed to various factors, such as an increase in the threat landscape, changes to industry regulations and standards, and new organizational goals that security has to align with.
  • Furthermore, with the limited time to communicate with executive stakeholders, both in frequency and duration, identifying the most important information to address can be challenging.

76% of security leaders struggle in conveying the effectiveness of a cybersecurity program.

62% find it difficult to balance the risk of too much detail and need-to-know information.

41% find it challenging to communicate effectively with a mixed technical and non-technical audience.

Source: Deloitte, 2022

Common obstacles

There is a disconnect between security leaders and executive stakeholders when it comes to the security posture of the organization:

  • Executive stakeholders are not confident that their security leaders are doing enough to mitigate security risks.
  • The issue has been amplified, with security threats constantly increasing across all industries.
  • However, security leaders don’t feel that they are in a position to make themselves heard.
  • The lack of organizational security awareness and support from cross-functional departments has made it difficult to achieve security objectives (e.g. education, investments).
  • Defining an approach to remove that disconnect with executive stakeholders is of utmost importance for security leaders, in order to improve their organization’s security posture.

9% of boards are extremely confident in their organization’s cybersecurity risk mitigation measures.

77% of organizations have seen an increase in the number of attacks in 2021.

56% of security leaders claimed their team is not involved when leadership makes urgent security decisions.

Source: EY, 2021
The image contains a screenshot of an Info-Tech Thoughtmodel titled: Presenting Security to Executive Stakeholders.

Info-Tech’s methodology for presenting security to executive stakeholders

1. Identify communication goals

2. Collect information to support goals

3. Develop communication

4. Deliver communication

Phase steps

  1. Identify drivers for communicating to executives
  2. Define your goals for communicating to executives
  1. Identify data to collect
  2. Plan how to retrieve data
  1. Plan communication
  2. Build a compelling communication document
  1. Deliver a captivating presentation
  2. Obtain/verify goals

Phase outcomes

A defined list of drivers and goals to help you develop your security presentations

A list of data sources to include in your communication

A completed communication template

A solidified understanding of how to effectively communicate security to your stakeholders

Develop a structured process for communicating security to your stakeholders

Security presentations are not a one-way street
The key to a successful executive security presentation is having a goal for the presentation and verifying that you have met your goal.

Identifying your goals is the foundation of an effective presentation
Defining your drivers and goals for communicating security will enable you to better prepare and deliver your presentation, which will help you obtain your desired outcome.

Harness the power of data
Leveraging data and analytics will help you provide quantitative-based communication, which will result in a more meaningful and effective presentation.

Take your audience on a journey
Developing a storytelling approach will help engage with your audience.

Win your audience by building a rapport
Establishing credibility and trust with executive stakeholders will enable you to obtain their support for security objectives.

Tactical insight
Conduct background research on audience members (i.e. professional background) to help understand how best to communicate with them and overcome potential objections.

Tactical insight
Verifying your objectives at the end of the communication is important, as it ensures you have successfully communicated to executive stakeholders.

Project deliverables

This blueprint is accompanied by a supporting deliverable which includes five security presentation templates.

Report on Security Initiatives
Template showing how to inform executive stakeholders of security initiatives.

Report on Security Initiatives.

Security Metrics
Template showing how to inform executive stakeholders of current security metrics that would help drive future initiatives.

Security Metrics.

Security Incident Response & Recovery
Template showing how to inform executive stakeholders of security incidents, their impact, and the response plan.

Security Incident Response & Recovery

Security Funding Request
Template showing how to inform executive stakeholders of security incidents, their impact, and the response plan.

Security Funding Request

Key template:

Security and Risk Update

Template showing how to inform executive stakeholders of proactive security and risk initiatives.

Blueprint benefits

IT/InfoSec benefits

Business benefits

  • Reduce effort and time spent preparing cybersecurity presentations for executive stakeholders by having templates to use.
  • Enable security leaders to better prepare what to present and how to present it to their executive stakeholders, as well as driving the required outcomes from those presentations.
  • Establish a best practice for communicating security and IT to executive stakeholders.
  • Gain increased awareness of cybersecurity and the impact executive stakeholders can have on improving an organization’s security posture.
  • Understand how security’s alignment with the business will enable the strategic growth of the organization.
  • Gain a better understanding of how security and IT objectives are developed and justified.

Measure the value of this blueprint

Phase

Measured Value (Yearly)

Phase 1: Identify communication goals

Cost to define drivers and goals for communicating security to executives:

16 FTE hours @ $233K* =$1,940

Phase 2: Collect information to support goals

Cost to collect and synthesize necessary data to support communication goals:

16 FTE hours @ $233K = $1,940

Phase 3: Develop communication

Cost to develop communication material that will contextualize information being shown:

16 FTE hours @ $233K = $1,940

Phase 4: Deliver communication

Potential Savings:

Total estimated effort = $5,820

Our blueprint will help you save $5,820 and over 40 FTE hours

* The financial figure depicts the annual salary of a CISO in 2022

Source: Chief Information Security Officer Salary.” Salary.com, 2022

Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

DIY Toolkit

“Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

Guided Implementation

“Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

Workshop

“We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

Consulting

“Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

Phase 1

Identify communication goals

Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4

1.1 Identify drivers for communicating to executives

1.2 Define your goals for communicating to executives

2.1 Identify data to collect

2.2 Plan how to retrieve data

3.1 Plan communication

3.2 Build a compelling communication document

4.1 Deliver a captivating presentation

4.2 Obtain/verify support for security goals

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

  • Understanding the different drivers for communicating security to executive stakeholders
  • Identifying different communication goals

This phase involves the following participants:

  • Security leader

1.1. Identify drivers for communicating to executive stakeholders

As a security leader, you meet with executives and stakeholders with diverse backgrounds, and you aim to showcase your organization’s security posture along with its alignment with the business’ goals.

However, with the constant changes in the security threat landscape, demands and drivers for security could change. Thus, understanding potential drivers that will influence your communication will assist you in developing and delivering an effective security presentation.

39% of organizations had cybersecurity on the agenda of their board’s quarterly meeting.

Source: EY, 2021.

Info-Tech Insight

Not all security presentations are the same. Keep your communication strategy and processes agile.

Know your drivers for security presentations

By understanding the influences for your security presentations, you will be able to better plan what to present to executive stakeholders.

  • These meetings, which are usually held once per quarter, provide you with less than one hour of presentation time.
  • Hence, it is crucial to know why you need to present security and whether these drivers are similar across the other presentations.

Understanding drivers will also help you understand how to present security to executive stakeholders.

  • These drivers will shape the structure of your presentation and help determine your approach to communicating your goals.
  • For example, financial-based presentations that are driven by budget requests might create a sense of urgency or assurance about investment in a security initiative.

Identify your communication drivers, which can stem from various initiatives and programs, including:

  • Results from internal or external audit reports.
  • Upcoming budget meetings.
  • Briefing newly elected executive stakeholders on security.

When it comes to identifying your communication drivers, you can collaborate with subject matter experts, like your corporate secretary or steering committees, to ensure the material being communicated will align with some of the organizational goals.

Examples of drivers for security presentations

Audit
Upcoming internal or external audits might require updates on the organization’s compliance

Organizational restructuring
Restructuring within an organization could require security updates

Merger & Acquisition
An M&A would trigger presentations on organization’s current and future security posture

Cyber incident
A cyberattack would require an immediate presentation on its impact and the incident response plan

Ad hoc
Provide security information requested by stakeholders

1.2. Define your goals for communicating to executives

After identifying drivers for your communication, it’s important to determine what your goals are for the presentation.

  • Communication drivers are mainly triggers for why you want to present security.
  • Communication goals are the potential outcomes you are hoping to obtain from the presentation.
  • Your communication goals would help identify what data and metrics to include in your presentation, the structure of your communication deck, and how you deliver your communication to executive stakeholders.

Identifying your communication goals could require the participation of the security team, IT leadership, and other business stakeholders.

  • As a group, brainstorm the security goals that align with your business goals for the coming year.
    • Aim to have at least two business goals that align with each security goal.
  • Identify what benefits and value the executive stakeholders will gain from the security goal being presented.
    • E.g. Increased security awareness, updates on organization's security posture.
  • Identify what the ask is for this presentation.
    • E.g. Approval for increasing budget to support security initiatives, executive support to implement internal security programs.

Info-Tech Insight

There can be different reasons to communicate security to executive stakeholders. You need to understand what you want to get out of your presentation.

Examples of security presentation goals

Educate
Educate the board on security trends and/or latest risks in the industry

Update
Provide updates on security initiatives, relevant security metrics, and compliance posture

Inform
Provide an incident response plan due to a security incident or deliver updates on current threats and risks

Investment
Request funding for security investments or financial updates on past security initiatives

Ad hoc
Provide security information requested by stakeholders

Phase 2

Collect information to support goals

Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4

1.1 Identify drivers for communicating to executives

1.2 Define your goals for communicating to executives

2.1 Identify data to collect

2.2 Plan how to retrieve data

3.1 Plan communication

3.2 Build a compelling communication document

4.1 Deliver a captivating presentation

4.2 Obtain/verify support for security goals

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

  • Understanding what types of data to include in your security presentations
  • Defining where and how to retrieve data

This phase involves the following participants:

  • Security leader
  • Network/security analyst

2.1 Identify data to collect

After identifying drivers and goals for your communication, it’s important to include the necessary data to justify the information being communicated.

  • Leveraging data and analytics will assist in providing quantitative-based communication, which will result in a more meaningful and effective presentation.
  • The data presented will showcase the visibility of an organization’s security posture along with potential risks and figures on how to mitigate those risks.
  • Providing analysis of the quantitative data presented will also showcase further insights on the figures, allow the audience to better understand the data, and show its relevance to the communication goals.

Identifying data to collect doesn’t need to be a rigorous task; you can follow these steps to help you get started:

  • Work with your security team to identify the main type of data applicable to the communication goals.
    • E.g. Financial data would be meaningful to use when communicating a budget presentation.
  • Identify supporting data linked to the main data defined.
    • E.g. If a financial investment is made to implement a security initiative, then metrics on improvements to the security posture will be relevant.
  • Show how both the main and supporting data align with the communication goals.
    • E.g. Improvement in security posture would increase alignment with regulation standards, which would result in additional contracts being awarded and increased revenue.

Info-Tech Insight

Understand how to present your information in a way that will be meaningful to your audience, for instance by quantifying security risks in financial terms.

Examples of data to present

Educate
Number of organizations in industry impacted by data breaches during past year; top threats and risks affecting the industries

Update
Degree of compliance with standards (e.g. ISO-27001); metrics on improvement of security posture due to security initiatives

Inform
Percentage of impacted clients and disrupted business functions; downtime; security risk likelihood and financial impact

Investment
Capital and operating expenditure for investment; ROI on past and future security initiatives

Ad hoc
Number of security initiatives that went over budget; phishing test campaign results

2.2 Plan how to retrieve the data

Once the data that is going to be used for the presentation has been identified, it is important to plan how the data can be retrieved, processed, and shared.

  • Most of the data leveraged for security presentations are structured data, which are highly organized data that are often stored in a relational and easily searchable database.
    • This includes security log reports or expenditures for ongoing and future security investments.
  • Retrieving the data, however, would require collaboration and cooperation from different team members.
  • You would need to work with the security team and other appropriate stakeholders to identify where the data is stored and who the data owner is.

Once the data source and owner has been identified, you need to plan how the data would be processed and leveraged for your presentation

  • This could include using queries to retrieve the relevant information needed (e.g. SQL, Microsoft Excel).
  • Verify the accuracy and relevance of the data with other stakeholders to ensure it is the most appropriate data to be presented to the executive stakeholders.

Info-Tech Insight

Using a data-driven approach to help support your objectives is key to engaging with your audience.

Plan where to retrieve the data

Identifying the relevant data sources to retrieve your data and the appropriate data owner enables efficient collaboration between departments collecting, processing, and communicating the data and graphics to the audience.

Examples of where to retrieve your data

Data Source

Data

Data Owner

Communication Goal

Audit & Compliance Reports

Percentage of controls completed to be certified with ISO 27001; Number of security threats & risks identified.

Audit Manager;

Compliance Manager;

Security Leader

Ad hoc, Educate, Inform

Identity & Access Management (IAM) Applications

Number of privileged accounts/department; Percentage of user accounts with MFA applied

Network/Security Analyst

Ad hoc, Inform, Update

Security Information & Event Management (SIEM)

Number of attacks detected and blocked before & after implementing endpoint security; Percentage of firewall rules that triggered a false positive

Network/Security Analyst

Ad hoc, Inform, Update

Vulnerability Management Applications

Percentage of critical vulnerabilities patched; Number of endpoints encrypted

Network/Security Analyst

Ad hoc, Inform, Update

Financial & Accounting Software

Capital & operating expenditure for future security investments; Return on investment (ROI) on past and current security investments

Financial and/or Accounting Manager

Ad hoc, Educate, Investments

Phase 3

Develop communication

Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4

1.1 Identify drivers for communicating to executives

1.2 Define your goals for communicating to executives

2.1 Identify data to collect

2.2 Plan how to retrieve data

3.1 Plan communication

3.2 Build a compelling communication document

4.1 Deliver a captivating presentation

4.2 Obtain/verify support for security goals

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

  • Identifying a communication strategy for presenting security
  • Identifying security templates that are applicable to your presentation

This phase involves the following participants:

  • Security leader

3.1 Plan communication: Know who your audience is

  • When preparing your communication, it's important to understand who your target audience is and to conduct background research on them.
  • This will help develop your communication style and ensure your presentation caters to the expected audience in the room.

Examples of two profiles in a boardroom

Formal board of directors

The executive team

  • In the private sector, this will include an appointed board of shareholders and subcommittees external to the organization.
  • In the public sector, this can include councils, commissions, or the executive team itself.
  • In government, this can include mayors, ministers, and governors.
  • The board’s overall responsibility is governance.
  • This audience will include your boss and your peers internal to the organization.
  • This category is primarily involved in the day-to-day operations of the organization and is responsible for carrying out the strategic direction set by the board.
  • The executive team’s overall responsibility is operations.

3.1.1 Know what your audience cares about

  • Understanding what your executive stakeholders value will equip you with the right information to include in your presentations.
  • Ensure you conduct background research on your audience to assist you in knowing what their potential interests are.
  • Your background research could include:
    • Researching the audience’s professional background through LinkedIn.
    • Reviewing their comments from past executive meetings.
    • Researching current security trends that align with organizational goals.
  • Once the values and risks have been identified, you can document them in notes and share the notes with subject matter experts to verify if these values and risks should be shared in the coming meetings.

A board’s purpose can include the following:

  • Sustaining and expanding the organization’s purpose and ability to execute in a competitive market.
  • Determining and funding the organization’s future and direction.
  • Protecting and increasing shareholder value.
  • Protecting the company’s exposure to risks.

Examples of potential values and risks

  • Business impact
  • Financial impact
  • Security and incidents

Info-Tech Insight
Conduct background research on audience members (e.g. professional background on LinkedIn) to help understand how best to communicate to them and overcome potential objections.

Understand your audience’s concerns

  • Along with knowing what your audience values and cares about, understanding their main concerns will allow you to address those items or align them with your communication.
  • By treating your executive stakeholders as your project sponsors, you would build a level of trust and confidence with your peers as the first step to tackling their concerns.
  • These concerns can be derived from past stakeholder meetings, recent trends in the industry, or strategic business alignments.
  • After capturing their concerns, you’ll be equipped with the necessary understanding on what material to include and prioritize during your presentations.

Examples of potential concerns for each profile of executive stakeholders

Formal board of directors

The executive team

  • Business impact (What is the impact of IT in solving business challenges?)
  • Investments (How will it impact organization’s finances and efficiency?)
  • Cybersecurity and risk (What are the top cybersecurity risks, and how is IT mitigating those risks to the business?)
  • Business alignment (How do IT priorities align to the business strategy and goals?)
  • IT operational efficiency (How is IT set up for success with foundational elements of IT’s operational strategy?)
  • Innovation & transformation priorities (How is IT enabling the organization’s competitive advantage and supporting transformation efforts as a strategic business partner?)

Build your presentation to tackle their main concerns

Your presentation should be well-rounded and compelling when it addresses the board’s main concerns about security.

Checklist:

  • Research your target audience (their backgrounds, board composition, dynamics, executive team vs. external group).
  • Include value and risk language in your presentation to appeal to your audience.
  • Ensure your content focuses on one or more of the board’s main concerns with security (e.g. business impact, investments, or risk).
  • Include information about what is in it for them and the organization.
  • Research your board’s composition and skillsets to determine their level of technical knowledge and expertise. This helps craft your presentation with the right amount of technology vs. business-facing information.

Info-Tech Insight
The executive stakeholder’s main concerns will always boil down to one important outcome: providing a level of confidence to do business through IT products, services, and systems – including security.

3.1.2 Take your audience through a security journey

  • Once you have defined your intended target and their potential concerns, developing the communication through a storytelling approach will be the next step to help build a compelling presentation.
  • You need to help your executive stakeholders make sense of the information being conveyed and allow them to understand the importance of cybersecurity.
  • Taking your audience through a story will allow them to see the value of the information being presented and better resonate with its message.
  • You can derive insights for your storytelling presentation by doing the following:
    • Provide a business case scenario on the topic you are presenting.
    • Identify and communicate the business problem up front and answer the three questions (why, what, how).
    • Quantify the problems in terms of business impact (money, risk, value).

Info-Tech Insight
Developing a storytelling approach will help keep your audience engaged and allow the information to resonate with them, which will add further value to the communication.

Identify the purpose of your presentation

You should be clear about your bottom line and the intent behind your presentation. However, regardless of your bottom line, your presentation must focus on what business problems you are solving and why security can assist in solving the problem.

Examples of communication goals

To inform or educate

To reach a decision

  • In this presentation type, it is easy for IT leaders to overwhelm a board with excessive or irrelevant information.
  • Focus your content on the business problem and the solution proposed.
  • Refrain from too much detail about the technology – focus on business impact and risk mitigated. Ask for feedback if applicable.
  • In this presentation type, there is a clear ask and an action required from the board of directors.
  • Be clear about what this decision is. Once again, don’t lead with the technology solution: Start with the business problem you are solving, and only talk about technology as the solution if time permits.
  • Ensure you know who votes and how to garner their support.

Info-Tech Insight
Nobody likes surprises. Communicate early and often. The board should be pre-briefed, especially if it is a difficult subject. This also ensures you have support when you deliver a difficult message.

Gather the right information to include in your boardroom presentation

Once you understand your target audience, it’s important to tailor your presentation material to what they will care about.

Typical IT boardroom presentations include:

  • Communicating the value of ongoing business technology initiatives.
  • Requesting funds or approval for a business initiative that IT is spearheading.
  • Security incident response/Risk/DRP.
  • Developing a business program or an investment update for an ongoing program.
  • Business technology strategy highlights and impacts.
  • Digital transformation initiatives (value, ROI, risk).

Info-Tech Insight
You must always have a clear goal or objective for delivering a presentation in front of your board of directors. What is the purpose of your board presentation? Identify your objective and outcome up front and tailor your presentation’s story and contents to fit this purpose.

Info-Tech Insight
Telling a good story is not about the message you want to deliver but the one the executive stakeholders want to hear. Articulate what you want them to think and what you want them to take away, and be explicit about it in your presentation. Make your story logically flow by identifying the business problem, complication, the solution, and how to close the gap. Most importantly, communicate the business impacts the board will care about.

Structure your presentation to tell a logical story

To build a strong story for your presentation, ensure you answer these three questions:

WHY

Why is this a business issue, or why should the executive stakeholders care?

WHAT

What is the impact of solving the problem and driving value for the company?

HOW

How will we leverage our resources (technology, finances) to solve the problem?

Examples:

Scenario 1: The company has experienced a security incident.

Intent: To inform/educate the board about the security incident.

WHY

The data breach has resulted in a loss of customer confidence, negative brand impact, and a reduction in revenue of 30%.

WHAT

Financial, legal, and reputational risks identified, and mitigation strategies implemented. IT is working with the PR team on communications. Incident management playbook executed.

HOW

An analysis of vulnerabilities was conducted and steps to address are in effect. Recovery steps are 90% completed. Incident management program reviewed for future incidents.

Scenario 2: Security is recommending investments based on strategic priorities.

Intent: To reach a decision with the board – approve investment proposal.

WHY

The new security strategy outlines two key initiatives to improve an organization’s security culture and overall risk posture.

WHAT

Security proposed an investment to implement a security training & phishing test campaign, which will assist in reducing data breach risks.

HOW

Use 5% of security’s budget to implement security training and phishing test campaigns.

Time plays a key role in delivering an effective presentation

What you include in your story will often depend on how much time you have available to deliver the message.

Consider the following:

  • Presenting to executive stakeholders often means you have a short window of time to deliver your message. The average executive stakeholder presentation is 15 minutes, and this could be cut short due to other unexpected factors.
  • If your presentation is too long, you risk overwhelming or losing your audience. You must factor in the time constraints when building your board presentation.
  • Your executive stakeholders have a wealth of experience and knowledge, which means they could jump to conclusions quickly based on their own experiences. Ensure you give them plenty of background information in advance. Provide your presentation material, a brief, or any other supporting documentation before the meeting to show you are well prepared.
  • Be prepared to have deep conversations about the topic, but respect that the executive stakeholders might not be interested in hearing the tactical information. Build an elevator pitch, a one-pager, back-up slides that support your ask and the story, and be prepared to answer questions within your allotted presentation time to dive deeper.

Navigating through Q&A

Use the Q&A portion to build credibility with the board.

  • It is always better to say, “I’m not certain about the answer but will follow up,” than to provide false or inaccurate information on the spot.
  • When asked challenging or irrelevant questions, ensure you have an approach to deflect them. Questions can often be out of scope or difficult to answer in a group. Find what works for you to successfully navigate through these questions:
    • “Let’s work with the sub-committee to find you an answer.”
    • “Let’s take that offline to address in more detail.”
    • “I have some follow-up material I can provide you to discuss that further after our meeting.”
  • And ensure you follow up! Make sure to follow through on your promise to provide information or answers after the meeting. This helps build trust and credibility with the board.

Info-Tech Insight
The average board presentation is 15 minutes long. Build no more than three or four slides of content to identify the business problem, the business impacts, and the solution. Leave five minutes for questions at the end, and be prepared with back-up slides to support your answers.

Storytelling checklist

Checklist:

  • Tailor your presentation based on how much time you have.
  • Find out ahead of time how much time you have.
  • Identify if your presentation is to inform/educate or reach a decision.
  • Identify and communicate the business problem up front and answer the three questions (why, what, how).
  • Express the problem in terms of business impact (risk, value, money).
  • Prepare and send pre-meeting collateral to the members of the board and executive team.
  • Include no more than 5-6 slides for your presentation.
  • Factor in Q&A time at the end of your presentation window.
  • Articulate what you want them to think and what you want them to take away – put it right up front and remind them at the end.
  • Have an elevator speech handy – one or two sentences and a one-pager version of your story.
  • Consider how you will build your relationship with the members outside the boardroom.

3.1.3 Build a compelling communication document

Once you’ve identified your communication goals, data, and plan to present to your stakeholders, it’s important to build the compelling communication document that will attract all audiences.

A good slide design increases the likelihood that the audience will read the content carefully.

  • Bad slide structure (flow) = Audience loses focus
    • You can have great content on a slide, but if a busy audience gets confused, they’ll just close the file or lose focus. Structure encompasses horizontal and vertical logic.
  • Good visual design = Audience might read more
    • Readers will probably skim the slides first. If the slides look ugly, they will already have a negative impression. If the slides are visually appealing, they will be more inclined to read carefully. They may even use some slides to show others.
  • Good content + Good structure + Visual appeal = Good presentation
    • A presentation is like a house. Good content is the foundation of the house. Good structure keeps the house strong. Visual appeal differentiates houses.

Slide design best practices

Leverage these slide design best practices to assist you in developing eye-catching presentations.

  • Easy to read: Assume reader is tight on time. If a slide looks overwhelming, the reader will close the document.
  • Concise and clear: Fewer words = more skim-able.
  • Memorable: Use graphics and visuals or pithy quotes whenever you can do so appropriately.
  • Horizontal logic: Good horizontal logic will have slide titles that cascade into a story with no holes or gaps.
  • Vertical logic: People usually read from left to right, top to bottom, or in a Z pattern. Make sure your slide has an intuitive flow of content.
  • Aesthetics: People like looking at visually appealing slides, but make sure your attempts to create visual appeal do not detract from the content.

Your presentation must have a logical flow

Horizontal logic

Vertical logic

  • Horizontal logic should tell a story.
  • When slide titles are read in a cascading manner, they will tell a logical and smooth story.
  • Title & tagline = thesis (best insight).
  • Vertical logic should be intuitive.
  • Each step must support the title.
  • The content you intend to include within each slide is directly applicable to the slide title.
  • One main point per slide.

Vertical logic should be intuitive

The image contains a screenshot example of a bad design layout for a slide. The image contains a screenshot example of a good design layout for a slide.

The audience is unsure where to look and in what order.

The audience knows to read the heading first. Then look within the pie chart. Then look within the white boxes to the right.

Horizontal and vertical logic checklists

Horizontal logic

Vertical logic

  • List your slide titles in order and read through them.
  • Good horizontal logic should feel like a story. Incomplete horizontal logic will make you pause or frown.
  • After a self-test, get someone else to do the same exercise with you observing them.
  • Note at which points they pause or frown. Discuss how those points can be improved.
  • Now consider each slide title proposed and the content within it.
  • Identify if there is a disconnect in title vs. content.
  • If there is a disconnect, consider changing the title of the slide to appropriately reflect the content within it, or consider changing the content if the slide title is an intended path in the story.

Make it easy to read

The image contains a screenshot that demonstrates an uneasy to read slide. The image contains a screenshot that demonstrates an easy to read slide.
  • Unnecessary coloring makes it hard on the eyes
  • Margins for title at top is too small
  • Content is not skim-able (best to break up the slide)

Increase skim-ability:

  • Emphasize the subheadings
  • Bold important words

Make it easier on the eyes:

  • Declutter and add sections
  • Have more white space

Be concise and clear

  1. Write your thoughts down
    • This gets your content documented.
    • Don’t worry about clarity or concision yet.
  2. Edit for clarity
    • Make sure the key message is very clear.
    • Find your thesis statement.
  3. Edit for concision
    • Remove unnecessary words.
    • Use the active voice, not passive voice (see below for examples).

Passive voice

Active voice

“There are three things to look out for” (8 words)

“Network security was compromised by hackers” (6 words)

“Look for these three things” (5 words)

“Hackers compromised network security” (4 words)

Be memorable

The image contains a screenshot of an example that demonstrates a bad example of how to be memorable. The image contains a screenshot of an example that demonstrates a good example of how to be memorable.

Easy to read, but hard to remember the stats.

The visuals make it easier to see the size of the problem and make it much more memorable.

Remember to:

  • Have some kind of visual (e.g. graphs, icons, tables).
  • Divide the content into sections.
  • Have a bit of color on the page.

Aesthetics

The image contains a screenshot of an example of bad aesthetics. The image contains a screenshot of an example of good aesthetics.

This draft slide is just content from the outline document on a slide with no design applied yet.

  • Have some kind of visual (e.g. graphs, icons, tables) as long as it’s appropriate.
  • Divide the content into sections.
  • Have a bit of color on the page.
  • Bold or italicize important text.

Why use visuals?

How graphics affect us

Cognitively

  • Engage our imagination
  • Stimulate the brain
  • Heighten creative thinking
  • Enhance or affect emotions

Emotionally

  • Enhance comprehension
  • Increase recollection
  • Elevate communication
  • Improve retention

Visual clues

  • Help decode text
  • Attract attention
  • Increase memory

Persuasion

  • 43% more effective than text alone
Source: Management Information Systems Research Center

Presentation format

Often stakeholders prefer to receive content in a specific format. Make sure you know what you require so that you are not scrambling at the last minute.

  • Is there a standard presentation template?
  • Is a hard-copy handout required?
  • Is there a deadline for draft submission?
  • Is there a deadline for final submission?
  • Will the presentation be circulated ahead of time?
  • Do you know what technology you will be using?
  • Have you done a dry run in the meeting room?
  • Do you know the meeting organizer?

Checklist to build compelling visuals in your presentation

Leverage this checklist to ensure you are creating the perfect visuals and graphs for your presentation.

Checklist:

  • Do the visuals grab the audience’s attention?
  • Will the visuals mislead the audience/confuse them?
  • Do the visuals facilitate data comparison or highlight trends and differences in a more effective manner than words?
  • Do the visuals present information simply, cleanly, and accurately?
  • Do the visuals display the information/data in a concentrated way?
  • Do the visuals illustrate messages and themes from the accompanying text?

3.2 Security communication templates

Once you have identified your communication goals and plans for building your communication document, you can start building your presentation deck.

These presentation templates highlight different security topics depending on your communication drivers, goals, and available data.

Info-Tech has created five security templates to assist you in building a compelling presentation.

These templates provide support for presentations on the following five topics:

  • Security Initiatives
  • Security & Risk Update
  • Security Metrics
  • Security Incident Response & Recovery
  • Security Funding Request

Each template provides instructions on how to use it and tips on ensuring the right information is being presented.

All the templates are customizable, which enables you to leverage the sections you need while also editing any sections to your liking.

The image contains screenshots of the Security Presentation Templates.

Download the Security Presentation Templates

Security template example

It’s important to know that not all security presentations for an organization are alike. However, these templates would provide a guideline on what the best practices are when communicating security to executive stakeholders.

Below is an example of instructions to complete the “Security Risk & Update” template. Please note that the security template will have instructions to complete each of its sections.

The image contains a screenshot of the Executive Summary slide. The image contains a screenshot of the Security Goals & Objectives slide.

The first slide following the title slide includes a brief executive summary on what would be discussed in the presentation. This includes the main security threats that would be addressed and the associated risk mitigation strategies.

This slide depicts a holistic overview of the organization’s security posture in different areas along with the main business goals that security is aligning with. Ensure visualizations you include align with the goals highlighted.

Security template example (continued)

The image contains a screenshot example of the Top Threats & Risks. The image contains a screenshot example of the Top Threats & Risks.

This slide displays any top threats and risks an organization is facing. Each threat consists of 2-3 risks and is prioritized based on the negative impact it could have on the organization (i.e. red bar = high priority; green bar = low priority). Include risks that have been addressed in the past quarter, and showcase any prioritization changes to those risks.

This slide follows the “Top Threats & Risks” slide and focuses on the risks that had medium or high priority. You will need to work with subject matter experts to identify risk figures (likelihood, financial impact) that will enable you to quantify the risks (Likelihood x Financial Impact). Develop a threshold for each of the three columns to identify which risks require further prioritization, and apply color coding to group the risks.

Security template example (continued)

The image contains a screenshot example of the slide, Risk Analysis. The image contains a screenshot example of the slide, Risk Mitigation Strategies & Roadmap.

This slide showcases further details on the top risks along with their business impact. Be sure to include recommendations for the risks and indicate whether further action is required from the executive stakeholders.

The last slide of the “Security Risk & Update” template presents a timeline of when the different initiatives to mitigate security risks would begin. It depicts what initiatives will be completed within each fiscal year and the total number of months required. As there could be many factors to a project’s timeline, ensure you communicate to your executive stakeholders any changes to the project.

Phase 4

Deliver communication

Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4

1.1 Identify drivers for communicating to executives

1.2 Define your goals for communicating to executives

2.1 Identify data to collect

2.2 Plan how to retrieve data

3.1 Plan communication

3.2 Build a compelling communication document

4.1 Deliver a captivating presentation

4.2 Obtain/verify support for security goals

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

  • Identifying a strategy to deliver compelling presentations
  • Ensuring you follow best practices for communicating and obtaining your security goals

This phase involves the following participants:

  • Security leader

4.1 Deliver a captivating presentation

You’ve gathered all your data, you understand what your audience is expecting, and you are clear on the outcomes you require. Now, it’s time to deliver a presentation that both engages and builds confidence.

Follow these tips to assist you in developing an engaging presentation:

  • Start strong: Give your audience confidence that this will be a good investment of their time. Establish a clear direction for what’s going to be covered and what the desired outcome is.
  • Use your time wisely: Odds are, your audience is busy, and they have many other things on their minds. Be prepared to cover your content in the time allotted and leave sufficient time for discussion and questions.
  • Be flexible while presenting: Do not expect that your presentation will follow the path you have laid out. Anticipate jumping around and spending more or less time than you had planned on a given slide.

Keep your audience engaged with these steps

  • Be ready with supporting data. Don’t make the mistake of not knowing your content intimately. Be prepared to answer questions on any part of it. Senior executives are experts at finding holes in your data.
  • Know your audience. Who are you presenting to? What are their specific expectations? Are there sensitive topics to be avoided? You can’t be too prepared when it comes to understanding your audience.
  • Keep it simple. Don’t assume that your audience wants to learn the details of your content. Most just want to understand the bottom line, the impact on them, and how they can help. More is not always better.
  • Focus on solving issues. Your audience members have many of their own problems and issues to worry about. If you show them how you can help make their lives easier, you’ll win them over.

Info-Tech Insight
Establishing credibility and trust with executive stakeholders is important to obtaining their support for security objectives.

Be honest and straightforward with your communication

  • Be prepared. Being properly prepared means not only that your update will deliver the value that you expect, but also that you will have confidence and the flexibility you require when you’re taken off track.
  • Don’t sugarcoat it. These are smart, driven people that you are presenting to. It is neither beneficial nor wise to try to fool them. Be open and transparent about problems and issues. Ask for help.
  • No surprises. An executive stakeholder presentation is not the time or the place for a surprise. Issues seen as unexpected or contentious should always be dealt with prior to the meeting with those most impacted.

Hone presentation skills before meeting with the executive stakeholders

Know your environment

Be professional but not boring

Connect with your audience

  • Your organization has standards for how people are expected to dress at work. Make sure that your attire meets this standard – don’t be underdressed.
  • Think about your audience – would they appreciate you starting with a joke, or do they want you to get to the point as quickly as possible?
  • State the main points of your presentation confidently. While this should be obvious, it is essential. Your audience should be able to clearly see that you believe the points you are stating.
  • Present with lots of energy, smile, and use hand gestures to support your speech.
  • Look each member of the audience in the eye at least once during your presentation. Avoid looking at the ceiling, the back wall, or the floor. Your audience should feel engaged – this is essential to keeping their attention on you.
  • Never read from your slides. If there is text on a slide, paraphrase it while maintaining eye contact.

Checklist for presentation logistics

Optimize the timing of your presentation:

  • Less is more: Long presentations are detrimental to your cause – they lead to your main points being diluted. Keep your presentation short and concise.
  • Keep information relevant: Only present information that is important to your audience. This includes the information that they are expecting to see and information that connects to the business.
  • Expect delays: Your audience will likely have questions. While it is important to answer each question fully, it will take away from the precious time given to you for your presentation. Expect that you will not get through all the information you have to present.

Script your presentation:

  • Use a script to stay on track: Script your presentation before the meeting. A script will help you present your information in a concise and structured manner.
  • Develop a second script: Create a script that is about half the length of the first script but still contains the most important points. This will help you prepare for any delays that may arise during the presentation.
  • Prepare for questions: Consider questions that may be asked and script clear and concise answers to each.
  • Practice, practice, practice: Practice your presentation until you no longer need the script in front of you.

Checklist for presentation logistics (continued)

Other considerations:

  • After the introduction of your presentation, clearly state the objective – don’t keep people guessing and consequently lose focus on your message.
  • After the presentation is over, document important information that came up. Write it down or you may forget it soon after.
  • Rather than create a long presentation deck full of detailed slides that you plan to skip over during the presentation, create a second, compact deck that contains only the slides you plan to present. Send out the longer deck after the presentation.

Checklist for delivering a captivating presentation

Leverage this checklist to ensure you are prepared to develop and deliver an engaging presentation.

Checklist:

  • Start with a story or something memorable to break the ice.
  • Go in with the end state in mind (focus on the outcome/end goal and work back from there) – What’s your call to action?
  • Content must compliment your end goal, filter out any content that doesn’t compliment the end goal.
  • Be prepared to have less time to speak. Be prepared with shorter versions of your presentation.
  • Include an appendix with supporting data, but don’t be data heavy in your presentation. Integrate the data into a story. The story should be your focus.

Checklist for delivering a captivating presentation (continued)

  • Be deliberate in what you want to show your audience.
  • Ensure you have clean slides so the audience can focus on what you’re saying.
  • Practice delivering your content multiple times alone and in front of team members or your Info-Tech counselor, who can provide feedback.
  • How will you handle being derailed? Be prepared with a way to get back on track if you are derailed.
  • Ask for feedback.
  • Record yourself presenting.

4.2 Obtain and verify support on security goals

Once you’ve delivered your captivating presentation, it’s imperative to communicate with your executive stakeholders.

  • This is your opportunity to open the floor for questions and clarify any information that was conveyed to your audience.
  • Leverage your appendix and other supporting documents to justify your goals.
  • Different approaches to obtaining and verifying your goals could include:
    • Acknowledgment from the audience that information communicated aligns with the business’s goals.
    • Approval of funding requests for security initiatives.
    • Written and verbal support for implementation of security initiatives.
    • Identifying next steps for information to communicate at the next executive stakeholder meeting.

Info-Tech Insight
Verifying your objectives at the end of the presentation is important, as it ensures you have successfully communicated to executive stakeholders.

Checklist for obtaining and verify support on security goals

Follow this checklist to assist you in obtaining and verifying your communication goals.

Checklist:

  • Be clear about follow-up and next steps if applicable.
  • Present before you present: Meet with your executive stakeholders before the meeting to review and discuss your presentation and other supporting material and ensure you have executive/CEO buy-in.
  • “Be humble, but don’t crumble” – demonstrate to the executive stakeholders that you are an expert while admitting you don’t know everything. However, don’t be afraid to provide your POV and defend it if need be. Strike the right balance to ensure the board has confidence in you while building a strong relationship.
  • Prioritize a discussion over a formal presentation. Create an environment where they feel like they are part of the solution.

Summary of Accomplishment

Problem Solved

A better understanding of security communication drivers and goals

  • Understanding the difference between communication drivers and goals
  • Identifying your drivers and goals for security presentation

A developed a plan for how and where to retrieve data for communication

  • Insights on what type of data can be leveraged to support your communication goals
  • Understanding who you can collaborate with and potential data sources to retrieve data from

A solidified communication plan with security templates to assist in better presenting to your audience

  • A guideline on how to prepare security presentations to executive stakeholders
  • A list of security templates that can be customized and used for various security presentations

A defined guideline on how to deliver a captivating presentation to achieve your desired objectives

  • Clear message on best practices for delivering security presentations to executive stakeholders
  • Understanding how to verify your communication goals have been obtained

If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

Contact your account representative for more information.

workshops@infotech.com

1-888-670-8889

Related Info-Tech Research

Build an Information Security Strategy
This blueprint will walk you through the steps of tailoring best practices to effectively manage information security.

Build a Security Metrics Program to Drive Maturity
This blueprint will assist you in identifying security metrics that can tie to your organizational goals and build those metrics to achieve your desired maturity level.

Bibliography

Bhadauriya, Amit S. “Communicating Cybersecurity Effectively to the Board.” Metricstream. Web.
Booth, Steven, et al. “The Biggest Mistakes Made When Presenting Cyber Security to Senior Leadership or the Board, and How to Fix Them.” Mandiant, May 2019. Web.
Bradford, Nate. “6 Slides Every CISO Should Use in Their Board Presentation.” Security Boulevard, 9 July 2020. Web.
Buckalew, Lauren, et al. “Get the Board on Board: Leading Cybersecurity from the Top Down.” Newsroom, 2 Dec. 2019. Web.
Burg, Dave, et al. “Cybersecurity: How Do You Rise above the Waves of a Perfect Storm?” EY US - Home, EY, 22 July 2021. Web.
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Web.
“Chief Information Security Officer Salary.” Salary.com, 2022. Web.
“CISO's Guide to Reporting to the Board - Apex Assembly.” CISO's Guide To Reporting to the Board. Web.
“Cyber Security Oversight in the Boardroom” KPMG, Jan. 2016. Web.
“Cybersecurity CEO: My 3 Tips for Presenting in the Boardroom.” Cybercrime Magazine, 31 Mar. 2020. Web.
Dacri , Bryana. Do's & Don'ts for Security Professionals Presenting to Executives. Feb. 2018. Web.
Froehlich, Andrew. “7 Cybersecurity Metrics for the Board and How to Present Them: TechTarget.” Security, TechTarget, 19 Aug. 2022. Web.
“Global Board Risk Survey.” EY. Web.
“Guidance for CISOs Presenting to the C-Suite.” IANS, June 2021. Web.
“How to Communicate Cybersecurity to the Board of Directors.” Cybersecurity Conferences & News, Seguro Group, 12 Mar. 2020. Web.
Ide, R. William, and Amanda Leech. “A Cybersecurity Guide for Directors” Dentons. Web.
Lindberg, Randy. “3 Tips for Communicating Cybersecurity to the Board.” Cybersecurity Software, Rivial Data Security, 8 Mar. 2022. Web.
McLeod, Scott, et al. “How to Present Cybersecurity to Your Board of Directors.” Cybersecurity & Compliance Simplified, Apptega Inc, 9 Aug. 2021. Web.
Mickle, Jirah. “A Recipe for Success: CISOs Share Top Tips for Successful Board Presentations.” Tenable®, 28 Nov. 2022. Web.
Middlesworth, Jeff. “Top-down: Mitigating Cybersecurity Risks Starts with the Board.” Spiceworks, 13 Sept. 2022. Web.
Mishra, Ruchika. “4 Things Every CISO Must Include in Their Board Presentation.” Security Boulevard, 17 Nov. 2020. Web.
O’Donnell-Welch, Lindsey. “CISOs, Board Members and the Search for Cybersecurity Common Ground.” Decipher, 20 Oct. 2022. Web.

Bibliography

“Overseeing Cyber Risk: The Board's Role.” PwC, Jan. 2022. Web.
Pearlson, Keri, and Nelson Novaes Neto. “7 Pressing Cybersecurity Questions Boards Need to Ask.” Harvard Business Review, 7 Mar. 2022. Web.
“Reporting Cybersecurity Risk to the Board of Directors.” Web.
“Reporting Cybersecurity to Your Board - Steps to Prepare.” Pondurance ,12 July 2022. Web.
Staynings, Richard. “Presenting Cybersecurity to the Board.” Resource Library. Web.
“The Future of Cyber Survey.” Deloitte, 29 Aug. 2022. Web.
“Top Cybersecurity Metrics to Share with Your Board.” Packetlabs, 10 May 2022. Web.
Unni, Ajay. “Reporting Cyber Security to the Board? How to Get It Right.” Cybersecurity Services Company in Australia & NZ, 10 Nov. 2022. Web.
Vogel, Douglas, et al. “Persuasion and the Role of Visual Presentation Support.” Management Information Systems Research Center, 1986.
“Welcome to the Cyber Security Toolkit for Boards.” NCSC. Web.

Research Contributors

  • Fred Donatucci, New-Indy Containerboard, VP, Information Technology
  • Christian Rasmussen, St John Ambulance, Chief Information Officer
  • Stephen Rondeau, ZimVie, SVP, Chief Information Officer

Deliver a Customer Service Training Program to Your IT Department

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}484|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
  • member rating average dollars saved: $4,339 Average $ Saved
  • member rating average days saved: 6 Average Days Saved
  • Parent Category Name: Service Desk
  • Parent Category Link: /service-desk
  • The scope of service that the service desk must provide has expanded. With the growing complexity of technologies to support, it becomes easy to forget the customer service side of the equation. Meanwhile, customer expectations for prompt, frictionless, and exceptional service from anywhere have grown.
  • IT departments struggle to hire and retain talented service desk agents with the right mix of technical and customer service skills.
  • Some service desk agents don’t believe or understand that customer service is an integral part of their role.
  • Many IT leaders don’t ask for feedback from users to know if there even is a customer service problem.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • There’s a common misconception that customer service skills can’t be taught, so no effort is made to improve those skills.
  • Even when there is a desire to improve customer service, it’s hard for IT teams to make time for training and improvement when they’re too busy trying to keep up with tickets.
  • A talented service desk agent with both great technical and customer service skills doesn’t have to be a rare unicorn, and an agent without innate customer service skills isn’t a lost cause. Relevant and impactful customer service habits, techniques, and skills can be taught through practical, role-based training.
  • IT leaders can make time for this training through targeted, short modules along with continual on-the-job coaching and development.

Impact and Result

  • Good customer service is critical to the success of the service desk. How a service desk treats its customers will determine its customers' satisfaction with not only IT but also the company as a whole.
  • Not every technician has innate customer service skills. IT managers need to provide targeted, practical training on what good customer service looks like at the service desk.
  • One training session is not enough to make a change. Leaders must embed the habits, create a culture of engagement and positivity, provide continual coaching and development, regularly gather customer feedback, and seek ways to improve.

Deliver a Customer Service Training Program to Your IT Department Research & Tools

Start here – read the Executive Brief

Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should deliver customer service training to your team, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

  • Deliver a Customer Service Training Program to Your IT Department – Executive Brief
  • Deliver a Customer Service Training Program to Your IT Department Storyboard

1. Deliver customer service training to your IT team

Understand the importance of customer service training, then deliver Info-Tech's training program to your IT team.

  • Customer Service Training for the Service Desk – Training Deck
  • Customer Focus Competency Worksheet
  • Cheat Sheet: Service Desk Communication
  • Cheat Sheet: Service Desk Written Communication
[infographic]

Craft a Customer-Driven Market Strategy With Unbiased Data

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}611|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: N/A
  • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
  • member rating average days saved: N/A
  • Parent Category Name: Selection & Implementation
  • Parent Category Link: /selection-and-implementation
  • Market strategies are informed by gut feel and endless brainstorming instead of market data to take their product from concept to customer.
  • Hiring independent market research firms results in a lack of unbiased third-party data. Research firms tell vendors what they want to hear instead of offering an agnostic view of software trends.
  • Dissatisfied customers don’t tell you directly why they are leaving, so there is no feedback loop back into product improvements.
  • Often a market strategy is built after a product is developed to force the product’s fit in the market. The product marketing team has no say in the product vision or future improvements.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • Adopt the 5 P’s to building a winning market strategy: Proposition, Product, Pricing, Placement, and Promotion.
  • You can’t be everything to everyone. Testing your proposition in the market to see what sticks is a risky move. Promise future value using past successes by gaining a deeper understanding of which customers and submarkets truly align to your product.
  • Customers have learned to avoid shiny new objects but still expect rapid feature releases. Differentiating features require a closer look at the underpinning vendor capabilities. Having intentional feature releases requires a feedback loop into the product roadmap and increases influence by the product marketing team.
  • Price transparency and sensitivity should drive what you offer to customers. Negotiating solely on price is a race to the bottom.

Impact and Result

  • Leverage this report to gain insights on the software selection process and what top vendors do best.
  • Gain a bird’s-eye view on customer purchasing behavior using over 40,000 data points on satisfaction and importance collected directly from the source.
  • Build a winning market strategy influenced by real customer data that drives vendor success.

Craft a Customer-Driven Market Strategy With Unbiased Data Research & Tools

Read the storyboard

Read our storyboard to find out why you should leverage SoftwareReviews data to craft your market strategy, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand unbiased customer data on software purchasing triggers.

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

  • Craft a Customer-Driven Market Strategy With Unbiased Data Storyboard
[infographic]

First 30 Days Pandemic Response Plan

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}418|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: N/A
  • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
  • member rating average days saved: N/A
  • Parent Category Name: DR and Business Continuity
  • Parent Category Link: /business-continuity
  • Given the speed and scope of the spread of the pandemic, governments are responding with changes almost daily as to what organizations and people can and can’t do. This volatility and uncertainty challenges organizations to respond, particularly in the absence of a business continuity or crisis management plan.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • Assess the risk to and viability of your organization in order to create appropriate action and communication plans quickly.

Impact and Result

  • HR departments must be directly involved in developing the organization’s pandemic response plan. Use Info-Tech's Risk and Viability Matrix and uncover the crucial next steps to take during the first 30 days of the COVID-19 pandemic.

First 30 Days Pandemic Response Plan Research & Tools

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Create a response plan for the first 30 days of a pandemic

Manage organizational risk and viability during the first 30 days of a crisis.

  • First 30 Days Pandemic Response Plan Storyboard
  • Crisis Matrix Communications Template: Business As Usual
  • Crisis Matrix Communications Template: Organization Closing
  • Crisis Matrix Communications Template: Manage Risk and Leverage Resilience
  • Crisis Matrix Communications Template: Reduce Labor and Mitigate Risk
[infographic]

Define Your Cloud Vision

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}448|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: 9.5/10 Overall Impact
  • member rating average dollars saved: $182,333 Average $ Saved
  • member rating average days saved: 28 Average Days Saved
  • Parent Category Name: Cloud Strategy
  • Parent Category Link: /cloud-strategy

The cloud permeates the enterprise technology discussion. It can be difficult to separate the hype from the value. Should everything go to the cloud, or is that sentiment stoked by vendors looking to boost their bottom lines? Not everything should go to the cloud, but coming up with a systematic way to determine what belongs where is increasingly difficult as offerings get more complex.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

Don’t think about the cloud as an inevitable next step for all workloads. The cloud is merely another tool in the toolbox, ready to be used when appropriate and put away when it’s not needed. Cloud-first isn’t always the way to go.

Impact and Result

  • Evaluate workloads’ suitability for the cloud using Info-Tech’s methodology to select the optimal migration (or non-migration) path based on the value of cloud characteristics.
  • Codify risks tied to workloads’ cloud suitability and plan mitigations.
  • Build a roadmap of initiatives for actions by workload and risk mitigation.
  • Define a cloud vision to share with stakeholders.

Define Your Cloud Vision Research & Tools

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Define Your Cloud Vision – A step-by-step guide to generating, validating, and formalizing your cloud vision.

The cloud vision storyboard walks readers through the process of generating, validating and formalizing a cloud vision, providing a framework and tools to assess workloads for their cloud suitability and risk.

  • Define Your Cloud Vision – Phases 1-4

2. Cloud Vision Executive Presentation – A document that captures the results of the exercises, articulating use cases for cloud/non-cloud, risks, challenges, and high-level initiative items.

The executive summary captures the results of the vision exercise, including decision criteria for moving to the cloud, risks, roadblocks, and mitigations.

  • Cloud Vision Executive Presentation

3. Cloud Vision Workbook – A tool that facilitates the assessment of workloads for appropriate service model, delivery model, support model, and risks and roadblocks.

The cloud vision workbook comprises several assessments that will help you understand what service model, delivery model, support model, and risks and roadblocks you can expect to encounter at the workload level.

  • Cloud Vision Workbook
[infographic]

Workshop: Define Your Cloud Vision

Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

1 Understand the Cloud

The Purpose

Align organizational goals to cloud characteristics.

Key Benefits Achieved

An understanding of how the characteristics particular to cloud can support organizational goals.

Activities

1.1 Generate corporate goals and cloud drivers.

1.2 Identify success indicators.

1.3 Explore cloud characteristics.

1.4 Explore cloud service and delivery models.

1.5 Define cloud support models and strategy components.

1.6 Create state summaries for the different service and delivery models.

1.7 Select workloads for further analysis.

Outputs

Corporate cloud goals and drivers

Success indicators

Current state summaries

List of workloads for further analysis

2 Assess Workloads

The Purpose

Evaluate workloads for cloud value and action plan.

Key Benefits Achieved

Action plan for each workload.

Activities

2.1 Conduct workload assessment using the Cloud Strategy Workbook tool.

2.2 Discuss assessments and make preliminary determinations about the workloads.

Outputs

Completed workload assessments

Workload summary statements

3 Identify and Mitigate Risks

The Purpose

Identify and plan to mitigate potential risks in the cloud project.

Key Benefits Achieved

A list of potential risks and plans to mitigate them.

Activities

3.1 Generate a list of risks and potential roadblocks associated with the cloud.

3.2 Sort risks and roadblocks and define categories.

3.3 Identify mitigations for each identified risk and roadblock

3.4 Generate initiatives from the mitigations.

Outputs

List of risks and roadblocks, categorized

List of mitigations

List of initiatives

4 Bridge the Gap and Create the Strategy

The Purpose

Clarify your vision of how the organization can best make use of cloud and build a project roadmap.

Key Benefits Achieved

A clear vision and a concrete action plan to move forward with the project.

Activities

4.1 Review and assign work items.

4.2 Finalize the decision framework for each of the following areas: service model, delivery model, and support model.

4.3 Create a cloud vision statement

Outputs

Cloud roadmap

Finalized task list

Formal cloud decision rubric

Cloud vision statement

5 Next Steps and Wrap-Up

The Purpose

Complete your cloud vision by building a compelling executive-facing presentation.

Key Benefits Achieved

Simple, straightforward communication of your cloud vision to key stakeholders.

Activities

5.1 Build the Cloud Vision Executive Presentation

Outputs

Completed cloud strategy executive presentation

Completed Cloud Vision Workbook.

Further reading

Define Your Cloud Vision

Define your cloud vision before it defines you

Analyst perspective

Use the cloud’s strengths. Mitigate its weaknesses.

The cloud isn’t magic. It’s not necessarily cheaper, better, or even available for the thing you want it to do. It’s not mysterious or a cure-all, and it does take a bit of effort to systematize your approach and make consistent, defensible decisions about your cloud services. That’s where this blueprint comes in.

Your cloud vision is the culmination of this effort all boiled down into a single statement: “This is how we want to use the cloud.” That simple statement should, of course, be representative of – and built from – a broader, contextual strategy discussion that answers the following questions: What should go to the cloud? What kind of cloud makes sense? Should the cloud deployment be public, private, or hybrid? What does a migration look like? What risks and roadblocks need to be considered when exploring your cloud migration options? What are the “day 2” activities that you will need to undertake after you’ve gotten the ball rolling?

Taken as a whole, answering these questions is difficult task. But with the framework provided here, it’s as easy as – well, let’s just say it’s easier.

Jeremy Roberts

Research Director, Infrastructure and Operations

Info-Tech Research Group

Executive Summary

Your Challenge

  • You are both extrinsically motivated to move to the cloud (e.g. by vendors) and intrinsically motivated by internal digital transformation initiatives.
  • You need to define the cloud’s true value proposition for your organization without assuming it is an outsourcing opportunity or will save you money.
  • Your industry, once cloud-averse, is now normalizing the use of cloud services, but you have not established a basic cloud vision from which to develop a strategy at a later point.

Common Obstacles

  • Organizations jump to the cloud before defining their cloud vision and without any clear plan for realizing the cloud’s benefits.
  • Many organizations have a foot in the cloud already, but these decisions have been made in an ad hoc rather than systematic fashion.
  • You lack a consistent framework to assess your workloads’ suitability for the cloud.

Info-Tech's Approach

  • Evaluate workloads’ suitability for the cloud using Info-Tech’s methodology to select the optimal migration (or non-migration) path based on the value of cloud characteristics.
  • Codify risks tied to workloads’ cloud suitability and plan mitigations.
  • Build a roadmap of initiatives for actions by workload and risk mitigation.
  • Define a cloud vision to share with stakeholders.

Info-Tech Insight: 1) Base migration decisions on cloud characteristics. If your justification for the migration is simply getting your workload out of the data center, think again. 2) Address the risks up front in your migration plan. 3) The cloud changes roles and calls for different skill sets, but Ops is here to stay.

Your challenge

This research is designed to help organizations who need to:

  • Identify workloads that are good candidates for the cloud.
  • Develop a consistent, cost-effective approach to cloud services.
  • Outline and mitigate risks.
  • Define your organization’s cloud archetype.
  • Map initiatives on a roadmap.
  • Communicate your cloud vision to stakeholders so they can understand the reasons behind a cloud decision and differentiate between different cloud service and deployment models.
  • Understand the risks, roadblocks, and limitations of the cloud.

“We’re moving from a world where companies like Oracle and Microsoft and HP and Dell were all critically important to a world where Microsoft is still important, but Amazon is now really important, and Google also matters. The technology has changed, but most of the major vendors they’re betting their business on have also changed. And that’s super hard for people..” –David Chappell, Author and Speaker

Common obstacles

These barriers make this challenge difficult to address for many organizations:

  • Organizations jump to the cloud before defining their cloud vision and without any clear plan for realizing the cloud’s benefits.
  • Many organizations already have a foot in the cloud, but the choice to explore these solutions was made in an ad hoc rather than systematic fashion. The cloud just sort of happened.
  • The lack of a consistent assessment framework means that some workloads that probably belong in the cloud are kept on premises or with hosted services providers – and vice versa.
  • Securing cloud expertise is remarkably difficult – especially in a labor market roiled by the global pandemic and the increasing importance of cloud services.

Standard cloud challenges

30% of all cloud spend is self-reported as waste. Many workloads that end up in the cloud don’t belong there. Many workloads that do belong in the cloud aren’t properly migrated. (Flexera, 2021)

44% of respondents report themselves as under-skilled in the cloud management space. (Pluralsight, 2021)

Info-Tech’s approach

Goals and drivers

  • Service model
    • What type of cloud makes the most sense for workload archetypes? When does it make sense to pick SaaS over IaaS, for example?
  • Delivery model
    • Will services be delivered over the public cloud, a private cloud, or a hybrid cloud? What challenges accompany this decision?
  • Migration Path
    • What does the migration path look like? What does the transition to the cloud look like, and how much effort will be required? Amazon’s 6Rs framework captures migration options: rehosting, repurchasing, replatforming, and refactoring, along with retaining and retiring. Each workload should be assessed for its suitability for one or more of these paths.
  • Support model
    • How will services be provided? Will staff be trained, new staff hired, a service provider retained for ongoing operations, or will a consultant with cloud expertise be brought on board for a defined period? The appropriate support model is highly dependent on goals along with expected outcomes for different workloads.

Highlight risks and roadblocks

Formalize cloud vision

Document your cloud strategy

The Info-Tech difference:

  1. Determine the hypothesized value of cloud for your organization.
  2. Evaluate workloads with 6Rs framework.
  3. Identify and mitigate risks.
  4. Identify cloud archetype.
  5. Plot initiatives on a roadmap.
  6. Write action plan statement and goal statement.

What is the cloud, how is it deployed, and how is service provided?

Cloud Characteristics

  1. On-demand self-service: the ability to access reosurces instantly without vendor interaction
  2. Broad network access: all services delivered over the network
  3. Resource pooling: multi-tenant environment (shared)
  4. Rapid elasticity: the ability to expand and retract capabilities as needed
  5. Measured service: transparent metering

Service Model:

  1. Software-as-a-Service: all but the most minor configuration is done by the vendor
  2. Platform-as-a-Service: customer builds the application using tools provided by the provider
  3. Infrastructure-as-a-Service: the customer manages OS, storage, and the application

Delivery Model

  1. Public cloud: accessible to anyone over the internet; multi-tenant environment
  2. Private cloud: provisioned for a single organization with multiple units
  3. Hybrid cloud: two or more connected clouds; data is portage across them
  4. Community cloud: provisioned for a specific group of organizations

(National Institute of Standards and Technology)

A workload-first approach will allow you to take full advantage of the cloud’s strengths

  • Under all but the most exceptional circumstances, good cloud strategies will incorporate different service models. Very few organizations are “IaaS shops” or “SaaS shops,” even if they lean heavily in one direction.
  • These different service models (including non-cloud options like colocation and on-premises infrastructure) each have different strengths. Part of your cloud strategy should involve determining which of the services makes the most sense for you.
  • Own the cloud by understanding which cloud (or non-cloud!) offering makes the most sense for you given your unique context.

Migration paths

In a 2016 blog post, Amazon introduced a framework for understanding cloud migration strategies. The framework presented here is slightly modified – including a “relocate” component rather than a “retire” component – but otherwise hews close to the standard.

These migration paths reflect organizational capabilities and desired outcomes in terms of service models – cloud or otherwise. Retention means keeping the workload where it is, in a datacenter or a colocation service, or relocating to a colocation or hosted software environment. These represent the “non-cloud” migration paths.

In the graphic on the right, the paths within the red box lead to the cloud. Rehosting means lifting and shifting to an infrastructure environment. Migrating a virtual machine from your VMware environment on premises to Azure Virtual machines is a quick way to realize some benefits from the cloud. Migrating from SQL Server on premises to a cloud-based SQL solution looks a bit more like changing platforms (replatforming). It involves basic infrastructure modification without a substantial architectural component.

Refactoring is the most expensive of the options and involves engaging the software development lifecycle to build a custom solution, fundamentally rewriting the solution to be cloud native and take advantage of cloud-native architectures. This can result in a PaaS or an IaaS solution.

Finally, repurchasing means simply going to market and procuring a new solution. This may involve migrating data, but it does not require the migration of components.

Migration Paths

Retain (Revisit)

  • Keep the application in its current form, at least for now. This doesn’t preclude revisiting it in the future.

Relocate

  • Move the workload between datacenters or to a hosted software/colocation provider.

Rehost

  • Move the application to the cloud (IaaS) and continue to run it in more or less the same form as it currently runs.

Replatform

  • Move the application to the cloud and perform a few changes for cloud optimizations.

Refactor

  • Rewrite the application, taking advantage of cloud-native architectures.

Repurchase

  • Replace with an alternative, cloud-native application and migrate the data.

Support model

Support models by characteristic

Duration of engagement Specialization Flexibility
Internal IT Indefinite Varies based on nature of business Fixed, permanent staff
Managed Service Provider Contractually defined General, some specialization Standard offering
Consultant Project-based Specific, domain-based Entirely negotiable

IT services, including cloud services, can be delivered and managed in multiple ways depending on the nature of the workload and the organization’s intended path forward. Three high-level options are presented here and may be more or less valuable based on the duration of the expected engagement with the service (temporary or permanent), the skills specialization required, and the flexibility necessary to complete the job.

By way of example, a highly technical, short-term project with significant flexibility requirements might be a good fit for an expensive consultant, whereas post-implementation maintenance of a cloud email system requires relatively little specialization and flexibility and would therefore be a better fit for internal management.

There is no universally applicable rule here, but there are some workloads that are generally a good fit for the cloud and others that are not as effective, with that fit being conditional on the appropriate support model being employed.

Risks, roadblocks, and strategy components

No two cloud strategies are exactly alike, but all should address 14 key areas. A key step in defining your cloud vision is an assessment of these strategy components. Lower maturity does not preclude an aggressive cloud strategy, but it does indicate that higher effort will be required to make the transition.

Component Description Component Description
Monitoring What will system owners/administrators need visibility into? How will they achieve this? Vendor Management What practices must change to ensure effective management of cloud vendors?
Provisioning Who will be responsible for deploying cloud workloads? What governance will this process be subject to? Finance Management How will costs be managed with the transition away from capital expenditure?
Migration How will cloud migrations be conducted? What best practices/standards must be employed? Security What steps must be taken to ensure that cloud services meet security requirements?
Operations management What is the process for managing operations as they change in the cloud? Data Controls How will data residency, compliance, and protection requirements be met in the cloud?
Architecture What general principles must apply in the cloud environment? Skills and roles What skills become necessary in the cloud? What steps must be taken to acquire those skills?
Integration and interoperability How will services be integrated? What standards must apply? Culture and adoption Is there a cultural aversion to the cloud? What steps must be taken to ensure broad cloud acceptance?
Portfolio Management Who will be responsible for managing the growth of the cloud portfolio? Governing bodies What formal governance must be put in place? Who will be responsible for setting standards?

Cloud archetypes – a cloud vision component

Once you understand the value of the cloud, your workloads’ general suitability for cloud, and your proposed risks and mitigations, the next step is to define your cloud archetype.

Your organization’s cloud archetype is the strategic posture that IT adopts to best support the organization’s goals. Info-Tech’s model recognizes seven archetypes, divided into three high-level archetypes.

After consultation with your stakeholders, and based on the results of the suitability and risk assessment activities, define your archetype. The archetype feeds into the overall cloud vision and provides simple insight into the cloud future state for all stakeholders.

The cloud vision itself is captured in a “vision statement,” a short summary of the overall approach that includes the overall cloud archetype.

We can best support the organization's goals by:

More Cloud

Less Cloud

Cloud Focused Cloud-Centric Providing all workloads through cloud delivery.
Cloud-First Using the cloud as our default deployment model. For each workload, we should ask “why NOT cloud?”
Cloud Opportunistic Hybrid Enabling the ability to transition seamlessly between on-premises and cloud resources for many workloads.
Integrated Combining cloud and traditional infrastructure resources, integrating data and applications through APIs or middleware.
Split Using the cloud for some workloads and traditional infrastructure resources for others.
Cloud Averse Cloud-Light Using traditional infrastructure resources and limiting our use of the cloud to when it is absolutely necessary.
Anti-Cloud Using traditional infrastructure resources and avoiding use of the cloud wherever possible.

Info-Tech’s methodology for defining your cloud vision

1. Understand the Cloud 2. Assess Workloads 3. Identify and Mitigate Risks 4. Bridge the Gap and Create the Vision
Phase Steps
  1. Generate goals and drivers
  2. Explore cloud characteristics
  3. Create a current state summary
  4. Select workloads for analysis
  1. Conduct workload assessments
  2. Determine workload future state
  1. Generate risks and roadblocks
  2. Mitigate risks and roadblocks
  3. Define roadmap initiatives
  1. Review and assign work items
  2. Finalize cloud decision framework
  3. Create cloud vision
Phase Outcomes
  1. List of goals and drivers
  2. Shared understanding of cloud terms
  3. Current state of cloud in the organization
  4. List of workloads to be assessed
  1. Completed workload assessments
  2. Defined workload future state
  1. List of risks and roadblocks
  2. List of mitigations
  3. Defined roadmap initiatives
  1. Cloud roadmap
  2. Cloud decision framework
  3. Completed Cloud Vision Executive Presentation

Insight summary

The cloud may not be right for you – and that’s okay!

Don’t think about the cloud as an inevitable next step for all workloads. The cloud is merely another tool in the toolbox, ready to be used when appropriate and put away when it’s not needed. Cloud first isn’t always the way to go.

Not all clouds are equal

It’s not “should I go to the cloud?” but “what service and delivery models make sense based on my needs and risk tolerance?” Thinking about the cloud as a binary can force workloads into the cloud that don’t belong (and vice versa).

Bottom-up is best

A workload assessment is the only way to truly understand the cloud’s value. Work from the bottom up, not the top down, understand what characteristics make a workload cloud suitable, and strategize on that basis.

Your accountability doesn’t change

You are still accountable for maintaining available, secure, functional applications and services. Cloud providers share some responsibility, but the buck stops where it always has: with you.

Don’t customize for the sake of customization

SaaS providers make money selling the same thing to everyone. When migrating a workload to SaaS, work with stakeholders to pursue standardization around a selected platform and avoid customization where possible.

Best of both worlds, worst of both worlds

Hybrid clouds are in fashion, but true hybridity comes with additional cost, administration, and other constraints. A convoy moves at the speed of its slowest member.

The journey matters as much as the destination

How you get there is as important as what “there” actually is. Any strategy that focuses solely on the destination misses out on a key part of the value conversation: the migration strategy.

Blueprint benefits

Cloud Vision Executive Presentation

This presentation captures the results of the exercises and presents a complete vision to stakeholders including a desired target state, a rubric for decision making, the results of the workload assessments, and an overall risk profile.

Cloud Vision Workbook

This workbook includes the standard cloud workload assessment questionnaire along with the results of the assessment. It also includes the milestone timeline for the implementation of the cloud vision.

Blueprint benefits

IT Benefits

  • A consistent approach to the cloud takes the guesswork out of deployment decisions and makes it easier for IT to move on to the execution stage.
  • When properly incorporated, cloud services come with many benefits, including automation, elasticity, and alternative architectures (micro-services, containers). The cloud vision project will help IT readers articulate expected benefits and work towards achieving them.
  • A clear framework for incorporating organizational goals into cloud plans.

Business benefits

  • Simple, well-governed access to high-quality IT resources.
  • Access to the latest and greatest in technology to facilitate remote work.
  • Framework for cost management in the cloud that incorporates OpEx and chargebacks/showbacks. A clear understanding of expected changes to cost modeling is also a benefit of a cloud vision.
  • Clarity for stakeholders about IT’s response (and contribution to) IT strategic initiatives.

Measure the value of this blueprint

Don’t take our word for it:

  • The cloud vision material in various forms has been offered for several years, and members have generally benefited substantially, both from cloud vision workshops and from guided implementations led by analysts.
  • After each engagement, we send a survey that asks members how they benefited from the experience. Of 30 responses, the cloud vision research has received an average score of 9.8/10. Real members have found significant value in the process.
  • Additionally, members reported saving between 2 and 120 days (for an average of 17), and financial savings ranged from $1,920 all the way up to $1.27 million, for an average of $170,577.90! If we drop outliers on both ends, the average reported value of a cloud vision engagement is $37, 613.
  • Measure the value by calculating the time saved from using Info-Tech’s framework vs. a home-brewed cloud strategy alternative and by comparing the overall cost of a guided implementation or workshop with the equivalent offering from another firm. We’re confident you’ll come out ahead.

9.8/10 Average reported satisfaction

17 Days Average reported time savings

$37, 613 Average cost savings (adj.)

Executive Brief Case Study

Industry: Financial

Source: Info-Tech workshop

Anonymous financial institution

A small East Coast financial institution was required to develop a cloud strategy. This strategy had to meet several important requirements, including alignment with strategic priorities and best practices, along with regulatory compliance, including with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

The bank already had a significant cloud footprint and was looking to organize and formalize the strategy going forward.

Leadership needed a comprehensive strategy that touched on key areas including the delivery model, service models, individual workload assessments, cost management, risk management and governance. The output had to be consumable by a variety of audiences with varying levels of technical expertise and had to speak to IT’s role in the broader strategic goals articulated earlier in the year.

Results

The bank engaged Info-Tech for a cloud vision workshop and worked through four days of exercises with various IT team members. The bank ultimately decided on a multi-cloud strategy that prioritized SaaS while also allowing for PaaS and IaaS solutions, along with some non-cloud hosted solutions, based on organizational circumstances.

Bank cloud vision

[Bank] will provide innovative financial and related services by taking advantage of the multiplicity of best-of-breed solutions available in the cloud. These solutions make it possible to benefit from industry-level innovations, while ensuring efficiency, redundancy, and enhanced security.

Bank cloud decision workflow

  • SaaS
    • Platform?
      • Yes
        • PaaS
      • No
        • Hosted
      • IaaS
        • Other

Non-cloud

Cloud

Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

DIY Toolkit

"Our team has already made this crticial project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful."

Guided Implementation

"Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track."

Workshop

"We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off imediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place."

Consulting

"Our team does not have the time or the knowledge the take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

Diagnostics and consistent frameworks are used throughout all four options.

Guided Implementation

What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

A typical GI is between 8 to 12 calls over the course of 4 to 6 months.

Phase 1

  • Call #1: Discuss current state, challenges, etc.
  • Call #2: Goals, drivers, and current state.

Phase 2

  • Call #3: Conduct cloud suitability assessment for selected workloads.

Phase 3

  • Call #4: Generate and categorize risks.
  • Call #5: Begin the risk mitigation conversation.

Phase 4

  • Call #6: Complete the risk mitigation process
  • Call #7: Finalize vision statement and cloud decision framework.

Workshop Overview

Contact your account representative for more information.

workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Offsite day
Understand the cloud Assess workloads Identify and mitigate risks Bridge the gap and create the strategy Next steps and wrap-up (offsite)
Activities

1.1 Introduction

1.2 Generate corporate goals and cloud drivers

1.3 Identify success indicators

1.4 Explore cloud characteristics

1.5 Explore cloud service and delivery models

1.6 Define cloud support models and strategy components

1.7 Create current state summaries for the different service and delivery models

1.8 Select workloads for further analysis

2.1 Conduct workload assessments using the cloud strategy workbook tool

2.2 Discuss assessments and make preliminary determinations about workloads

3.1 Generate a list of risks and potential roadblocks associated with the cloud

3.2 Sort risks and roadblocks and define categories

3.3 Identify mitigations for each identified risk and roadblock

3.4 Generate initiatives from the mitigations

4.1 Review and assign work items

4.2 Finalize the decision framework for each of the following areas:

  • Service model
  • Delivery model
  • Support model

4.3 Create a cloud vision statement

5.1 Build the Cloud Vision Executive Presentation
Deliverables
  1. Corporate goals and cloud drivers
  2. Success indicators
  3. Current state summaries
  4. List of workloads for further analysis
  1. Completed workload assessments
  2. Workload summary statements
  1. List of risks and roadblocks, categorized
  2. List of mitigations
  3. List of initiatives
  1. Finalized task list
  2. Formal cloud decision rubric
  3. Cloud vision statement
  1. Completed cloud strategy executive presentation
  2. Completed cloud vision workbook

Understand the cloud

Build the foundations of your cloud vision

Phase 1

Phase 1

Understand the Cloud

Phase 1

1.1 Generate goals and drivers

1.2 Explore cloud characteristics

1.3 Create a current state summary

1.4 Select workloads for analysis

Phase 2

2.1 Conduct workload assessments

2.2 Determine workload future states

Phase 3

3.1 Generate risks and roadblocks

3.2 Mitigate risks and roadblocks

3.3 Define roadmap initiatives

Phase 4

4.1 Review and assign work items

4.2 Finalize cloud decision framework

4.3 Create cloud vision

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

1.1.1 Generate organizational goals

1.1.2 Define cloud drivers

1.1.3 Define success indicators

1.3.1 Record your current state

1.4.1 Select workloads for further assessment

This phase involves the following participants:

IT management, the core working group, security, infrastructure, operations, architecture, engineering, applications, non-IT stakeholders.

It starts with shared understanding

Stakeholders must agree on overall goals and what “cloud” means

The cloud is a nebulous term that can reasonably describe services ranging from infrastructure as a service as delivered by providers like Amazon Web Services and Microsoft through its Azure platform, right up to software as a service solutions like Jira or Salesforce. These solutions solve different problems – just because your CRM would be a good fit for a migration to Salesforce doesn’t mean the same system would make sense in Azure or AWS.

This is important because the language we use to talk about the cloud can color our approach to cloud services. A “cloud-first” strategy will mean something different to a CEO with a concept of the cloud rooted in Salesforce than it will to a system administrator who interprets it to mean a transition to cloud-hosted virtual machines.

Add to this the fact that not all cloud services are hosted externally by providers (public clouds) and the fact that multiple delivery models can be engaged at once through hybrid or multi-cloud approaches, and it’s apparent that a shared understanding of the cloud is necessary for a coherent strategy to take form.

This phase proceeds in four steps, each governed by the principle of shared understanding. The first requires a shared understanding of corporate goals and drivers. Step 2 involves coming to a shared understanding of the cloud’s unique characteristics. Step 3 requires a review of the current state. Finally, in Step 4, participants will identify workloads that are suitable for analysis as candidates for the cloud.

Step 1.1

Generate goals and drivers

Activities

1.1.1 Define organizational goals

1.1.2 Define cloud drivers

1.1.3 Define success indicators

Generate goals and drivers

Explore cloud characteristics

Create a current state summary

Select workloads for analysis

This step involves the following participants:

  • IT management
  • Core working group
  • Security
  • Applications
  • Infrastructure
  • Service management
  • Leadership

Outcomes of this step

  • List of organizational goals
  • List of cloud drivers
  • Defined success indicators

What can the cloud do for you?

The cloud is not valuable for its own sake, and not all users derive the same value

  • The cloud is characterized by on-demand self-service, broad network access, resource pooling, rapid elasticity, and measured service. Any or all of those characteristics might be enough to make the cloud appealing, but in most cases, there is an overriding driver.
  • Multiple paths may lead to the cloud. Consider an organization with a need to control costs by showing back to business units, or perhaps by reducing capital expenditure – the cloud may be the most appropriate way to effect these changes. Conversely, an organization expanding rapidly and with a need to access the latest and greatest technology might benefit from the elasticity and pooled resources that major cloud providers can offer.
  • In these cases, the destination might be the same (a cloud solution) but the delivery model – public, private, or hybrid – and the decisions made around the key strategy components, including architecture, provisioning, and cost management, will almost certainly be different.
  • Defining goals, understanding cloud drivers, and – crucially – understanding what success means, are all therefore essential elements of the cloud vision process.

1.1.1 Generate organizational goals

1-3 hours

Input

  • Strategy documentation

Output

  • Organizational goals

Materials

  • Whiteboard (digital/physical)

Participants

  • IT leadership
  • Infrastructure
  • Applications
  • Security
  1. As a group, brainstorm organizational goals, ideally based on existing documentation
    • Review relevant corporate and IT strategies.
    • If you do not have access to internal documentation, review the standard goals on the next slide and select those that are most relevant for you.
  2. Record the most important business goals in the Cloud Vision Executive Presentation. Include descriptions where possible to ensure wide readability.
  3. Make note of these goals. They should inform the answers to prompts offered in the Cloud Vision Workbook and should be a consistent presence in the remainder of the visioning exercise. If you’re conducting the session in person, leave the goals up on a whiteboard and make reference to them throughout the workshop.

Cloud Vision Executive Presentation

Standard COBIT 19 enterprise goals

  1. Portfolio of competitive products and services
  2. Managed business risk
  3. Compliance with external laws and regulations
  4. Quality of financial information
  5. Customer-oriented service culture
  6. Business service continuity and availability
  7. Quality of management information
  8. Optimization of internal business process functionality
  9. Optimization of business process costs
  10. Staff skills, motivation, and productivity
  11. Compliance with internal policies
  12. Managed digital transformation programs
  13. Product and business innovation

1.1.2 Define cloud drivers

30-60 minutes

Input

  • Organizational goals
  • Strategy documentation
  • Management/staff perspective

Output

  • List of cloud drivers

Materials

  • Sticky notes
  • Whiteboard
  • Markers

Participants

  • IT leadership
  • Infrastructure
  • Applications
  • Security
  1. Cloud drivers sit at a level of abstraction below organizational goals. Keeping your organizational goals in mind, have each participant in the session write down how they expect to benefit from the cloud on a sticky note.
  2. Solicit input one at a time and group similar responses. Encourage participants to bring forward their cloud goals even if similar goals have been mentioned previously. The number of mentions is a useful way to gauge the relative weight of the drivers.
  3. Once this is done, you should have a few groups of similar drivers. Work with the group to name each category. This name will be the driver reported in the documentation.
  4. Input the results of the exercise into the Cloud Vision Executive Presentation, and include descriptions based on the constituent drivers. For example, if a driver is titled “do more valuable work,” the constituent drivers might be “build cloud skills,” “focus on core products,” and “avoid administration work where possible.” The description would be based on these components.

Cloud Vision Executive Presentation

1.1.3 Define success indicators

1 hour

Input

  • Cloud drivers
  • Organizational goals

Output

  • List of cloud driver success indicators

Materials

  • Whiteboard
  • Markers

Participants

  • IT leadership
  • Infrastructure
  • Applications
  • Security
  1. On a whiteboard, draw a table with each of the cloud drivers (identified in 1.1.2) across the top.
  2. Work collectively to generate success indicators for each cloud driver. In this case, a success indicator is some way you can report your progress with the stated driver. It is a real-world proxy for the sometimes abstract phenomena that make up your drivers. Think about what would be true if your driver was realized.
    1. For example, if your driver is “faster access to resources,” you might consider indicators like developer satisfaction, project completion time, average time to provision, etc.
  3. Once you are satisfied with your list of indicators, populate the slide in the Cloud Vision Executive Presentation for validation from stakeholders.

Cloud Vision Executive Presentation

Step 1.2

Explore cloud characteristics

Activities

Understand the value of the cloud:

  • Review delivery models
  • Review support models
  • Review service models
  • Review migration paths

Understand the Cloud

Generate goals and drivers

Explore cloud characteristics

Create a current state summary

Select workloads for analysis

This step involves the following participants:

  • Core working group
  • Architecture
  • Engineering
  • Security

Outcomes of this step

  • Understanding of cloud service models and value

Defining the cloud

Per NIST, the cloud has five fundamental characteristics. All clouds have these characteristics, even if they are executed in somewhat different ways between delivery models, service models, and even individual providers.

Cloud characteristics

On-demand self-service

Cloud customers are capable of provisioning cloud resources without human interaction (e.g. contacting sales), generally through a web console.

Broad network access

Capabilities are designed to be delivered over a network and are generally intended for access by a wide variety of platform types (cloud services are generally device-agnostic).

Resource pooling

Multiple customers (internal, in the case of private clouds) make use of a highly abstracted shared infrastructure managed by the cloud provider.

Rapid elasticity

Customers are capable of provisioning additional resources as required, pulling from a functionally infinite pool of capacity. Cloud resources can be spun-down when no longer needed.

Measured service

Consumption is metered based on an appropriate unit of analysis (number of licenses, storage used, compute cycles, etc.) and billing is transparent and granular.

Cloud delivery models

The NIST definition of cloud computing outlines four cloud delivery models: public, private, hybrid, and community clouds. A community cloud is like a private cloud, but it is provisioned for the exclusive use of a like-minded group of organizations, usually in a mutually beneficial, non-competitive arrangement. Universities and hospitals are examples of organizations that can pool their resources in this way without impacting competitiveness. The Info-Tech model covers three key delivery models – public, private, and hybrid, and an overarching model (multi-cloud) that can comprise more than one of the other models – public + public, public + hybrid, etc.

Public

The cloud service is provisioned for access by the general public (customers).

Private

A private cloud has the five key characteristics, but is provisioned for use by a single entity, like a company or organization.

Hybrid

Hybridity essentially refers to interoperability between multiple cloud delivery models (public +private).

Multi

A multi-cloud deployment requires only that multiple clouds are used without any necessary interoperability (Nutanix, 2019).

Public cloud

This is what people generally think about when they talk about cloud

  • The public cloud is, well, public! Anyone can make use of its resources, and in the case of the major providers, capacity is functionally unlimited. Need to store exabytes of data in the cloud? No problem! Amazon will drive a modified shipping container to your datacenter, load it up, and “migrate” it to a datacenter.
  • Public clouds offer significant variety on the infrastructure side. Major IaaS providers, like Microsoft and Amazon, offer dozens of services across many different categories including compute, networking, and storage, but also identity, containers, machine learning, virtual desktops, and much, much more. (See a list from Microsoft here, and Amazon here)
  • There are undoubtedly strengths to the public cloud model. Providers offer the “latest and greatest” and customers need not worry about the details, including managing infrastructure and physical locations. Providers offer built-in redundancy, multi-regional deployments, automation tools, management and governance solutions, and a variety of leading-edge technologies that would not be feasible for organizations to run in-house, like high performance compute, blockchain, or quantum computing.
  • Of course, the public cloud is not all sunshine and rainbows – there are downsides as well. It can be expensive; it can introduce regulatory complications to have to trust another entity with your key information. Additionally, there can be performance hiccups, and with SaaS products, it can be difficult to monitor at the appropriate (per-transaction) level.

Prominent examples include:

AWS

Microsoft

Azure

Salesforce.com

Workday

SAP

Private cloud

A lower-risk cloud for cloud-averse customers?

  • A cloud is a cloud, no matter how small. Some IT shops deploy private clouds that make use of the five key cloud characteristics but provisioned for the exclusive use of a single entity, like a corporation.
  • Private clouds have numerous benefits. Some potential cloud customers might be uncomfortable with the shared responsibility that is inherent in the public cloud. Private clouds allow customers to deliver flexible, measured services without having to surrender control, but they require significant overhead, capital expenditure, administrative effort, and technical expertise.
  • According to the 2021 State of the Cloud Report, private cloud use is common, and the most frequently cited toolset is VMware vSphere, followed by Azure Stack, OpenStack, and AWS Outposts. Private cloud deployments are more common in larger organizations, which makes sense given the overhead required to manage such an environment.

Private cloud adoption

The images shows a graph titled Private Cloud Adoption for Enterprises. It is a horizontal bar graph, with three segments in each bar: dark blue marking currently use; mid blue marking experimenting; and light blue marking plan to use.

VMware and Microsoft lead the pack among private cloud customers, with Amazon and Red Hat also substantially present across private cloud environments.

Hybrid cloud

The best of both worlds?

Hybrid cloud architectures combine multiple cloud delivery models and facilitate some level of interoperability. NIST suggests bursting and load balancing as examples of hybrid cloud use cases. Note: it is not sufficient to simply have multiple clouds running in parallel – there must be a toolset that allows for an element of cross-cloud functionality.

This delivery model is attractive because it allows users to take advantage of the strengths of multiple service models using a single management pane. Bursting across clouds to take advantage of additional capacity or disaster recovery capabilities are two obvious use cases that appeal to hybrid cloud users.

But while hybridity is all the rage (especially given the impact Covid-19 has had on the workplace), the reality is that any hybrid cloud user must take the good with the bad. Multiple clouds and a management layer can be technically complex, expensive, and require maintaining a physical infrastructure that is not especially valuable (“I thought we were moving to the cloud to get out of the datacenter!”).

Before selecting a hybrid approach through services like VMware Cloud on AWS or Microsoft’s Azure Stack, consider the cost, complexity, and actual expected benefit.

Amazon, Microsoft, and Google dominate public cloud IaaS, but IBM is betting big on hybrid cloud:

The image is a screencap of a tweet from IBM News. The tweet reads: IBM CEO Ginni Rometty: Hybrid cloud is a trillion dollar market and we'll be number one #Think2019.

With its acquisition of Red Hat in 2019 for $34 billion, Big Blue put its money where its mouth is and acquired a substantial hybrid cloud business. At the time of the acquisition, Red Hat’s CEO, Jim Whitehurst, spoke about the benefit IBM expected to receive:

“Joining forces with IBM gives Red Hat the opportunity to bring more open source innovation to an even broader range of organizations and will enable us to scale to meet the need for hybrid cloud solutions that deliver true choice and agility” (Red Hat, 2019).

Multi-cloud

For most organizations, the multi-cloud is the most realistic option.

Multi-cloud is popular!

The image shows a graph titled Multi-Cloud Architectures Used, % of all Respondents. The largest percentage is Apps siloed on different clouds, followed by DAta integration between clouds.

Multi-cloud solutions exist at a different layer of abstraction from public, private, and even hybrid cloud delivery models. A multi-cloud architecture, as the name suggests, requires the user to be a customer of more than one cloud provider, and it can certainly include a hybrid cloud deployment, but it is not bound by the same rules of interoperability.

Many organizations – especially those with fewer resources or a lack of a use case for a private cloud – rely on a multi-cloud architecture to build applications where they belong, and they manage each environment separately (or occasionally with the help of cloud management platforms).

If your data team wants to work in AWS and your enterprise services run on basic virtual machines in Azure, that might be the most effective architecture. As the Flexera 2021 State of the Cloud Report suggests, this architecture is far more common than the more complicated bursting or brokering architectures characteristic of hybrid clouds.

NIST cloud service models

Software as a service

SaaS has exploded in popularity with consumers who wish to avail themselves of the cloud’s benefits without having to manage underlying infrastructure components. SaaS is simple, generally billed per-user per-month, and is almost entirely provider-managed.

Platform as a service

PaaS providers offer a toolset for their customers to run custom applications and services without the requirement to manage underlying infrastructure components. This service model is ideal for custom applications/services that don’t benefit from highly granular infrastructure control.

Infrastructure as a service

IaaS represents the sale of components. Instead of a service, IaaS providers sell access to components, like compute, storage, and networking, allowing for customers to build anything they want on top of the providers’ infrastructure.

Cloud service models

  • This research focuses on five key service models, each of which has its own strengths and weaknesses. Moving right from “on-prem,” customers gradually give up more control over their environments to cloud service providers.
  • An entirely premises-based environment means that the customer is responsible for everything ranging from the dirt under the datacenter to application-level configurations. Conversely, in a SaaS environment, the provider is responsible for everything but those top-level application configurations.
  • A managed service provider or other third party can manage any or of the components of the infrastructure stack. A service provider may, for example, build a SaaS solution on top of another provider’s IaaS, or might offer configuration assistance with a commercially available SaaS.

Info-Tech Insight

Not all workloads fit well in the cloud. Many environments will mix service models (e.g. SaaS for some workloads, some in IaaS, some on-premises), and this can be perfectly effective. It must be consistent and intentional, however.

On-prem Co-Lo IaaS PaaS SaaS
Application Application Application Application Application
Database Database Database Database Database
Runtime/ Middleware Runtime/ Middleware Runtime/ Middleware Runtime/ Middleware Runtime/ Middleware
OS OS OS OS OS
Hypervisor Hypervisor Hypervisor Hypervisor Hypervisor
Server Network Storage Server Network Storage Server Network Storage Server Network Storage Server Network Storage
Facilities Facilities Facilities Facilities Facilities

Organization has control

Organization or vendor may control

Vendor has control

Analytics folly

SaaS is good, but it’s not a panacea

Industry: Healthcare

Source: Info-Tech workshop

Situation

A healthcare analytics provider had already moved a significant number of “non-core workloads” to the cloud, including email, HRIS, and related services.

The company CEO was satisfied with the reduced effort required by IT to manage SaaS-based workloads and sought to extend the same benefits to the core analytics platform where there was an opportunity to reduce overhead.

Complication

Many components of the health analytics service were designed to run specifically in a datacenter and were not ready to be migrated to the cloud without significant effort/refactoring. SaaS was not an option because this was a core platform – a SaaS provider would have been the competition.

That left IaaS, which was expensive and would not bring the expected benefits (reduced overhead).

Results

The organization determined that there were no short-term gains from migrating to the cloud. Due to the nature of the application (its extensive customization, the fact that it was a core product sold by the company) any steps to reduce operational overhead were not feasible.

The CEO recognized that the analytics platform was not a good candidate for the cloud and what distinguished the analytics platform from more suitable workloads.

Migration paths

In a 2016 blog post, Amazon Web Services articulated a framework for cloud migration that incorporates elements of the journey as well as the destination. If workload owners do not choose to retain or retire their workloads, there are four alternatives. These alternatives all stack up differently along five key dimensions:

  1. Value: does the workload stand to benefit from unique cloud characteristics? To what degree?
  2. Effort: how much work would be required to make the transition?
  3. Cost: how much money is the migration expected to cost?
  4. Time: how long will the migration take?
  5. Skills: what skills must be brought to bear to complete the migration?

Not all migration paths can lead to all destinations. Rehosting generally means IaaS, while repurchasing leads to SaaS. Refactoring and replatforming have some variety of outcomes, and it becomes possible to take advantage of new IaaS architectures or migrate workloads over fully to SaaS.

As part of the workload assessment process, use the five dimensions (expanded upon on the next slide) to determine what migration path makes sense. Preferred migration paths form an important part of the overall cloud vision process.

Retain (Revisit)

  • Keep the application in its current form, at least for now. This doesn’t preclude revisiting it in the future.

Retire

  • Get rid of the application completely.

Rehost

  • Move the application to the cloud (IaaS) and continue to run it in more or less the same form as it currently runs.

Replatform

  • Move the application to the cloud and perform a few changes for cloud optimizations.

Refactor

  • Rewrite the application, taking advantage of cloud native architectures.

Repurchase

  • Replace with an alternative, cloud-native application and migrate the data.

Migration paths – relative value

Migration path Value Effort Cost Time Skills
Retain No real change in the absolute value of the workload if it is retained. No effort beyond ongoing workload maintenance. No immediate hard dollar costs, but opportunity costs and technical debt abound. No time required! (At least not right away…) Retaining requires the same skills it has always required (which may be more difficult to acquire in the future).
Rehire A retired workload can provide no value, but it is not a drain! Spinning a service down requires engaging that part of the lifecycle. N/A Retiring the service may be simple or complicated depending on its current role. N/A
Rehost Some value comes with rehosting, but generally components stay the same (VM here vs. a VM there). Minimal effort required, especially with automated tools. The effort will depend on the environment being migrated. Relatively cheap compared to other options. Rehosting infrastructure is the simplest cloud migration path and is useful for anyone in a hurry. Rehosting is the simplest cloud migration path for most workloads, but it does require basic familiarity with cloud IaaS.

Replatform

Replatformed workloads can take advantage of cloud-native services (SQL vs. SQLaaS). Replatforming is more effortful than rehosting, but less effortful than refactoring. Moderate cost – does not require fundamental rearchitecture, just some tweaking. Relatively more complicated than a simple rehost, but less demanding than a refactor. Platform and workload expertise is required; more substantial than a simple rehost.
Refactor A fully formed, customized cloud-based workload that can take advantage of cloud-native architectures is generally quite valuable. Significant effort required based on the requirement to engage the full SDLC. Significant cost required to engage SDLC and rebuild the application/service. The most complicated and time-consuming. The most complicated and time-consuming.
Repurchase Repurchasing is the quickest way to achieve cloud-native value. There are compromises, however (high cost, vendor-lock-in). Repurchasing is the quickest way to achieve cloud-native value. There are compromises, however (high cost, vendor-lock-in). Repurchasing is the quickest way to achieve cloud-native value. There are compromises, however (high cost, vendor-lock-in). Configuration – especially for massive projects – can be time consuming, but in general repurchasing can be quite fast. Buying software does require knowledge of requirements and integrations, but is otherwise quite simple.

Where should you get your cloud skills?

Cloud skills are certainly top of mind right now. With the great upheaval in both work patterns and in the labor market more generally, expertise in cloud-related areas is simultaneously more valuable and more difficult to procure. According to Pluralsight’s 2021 “State of Upskilling” report, 44% of respondents report themselves under-skilled in the cloud management area, making cloud management the most significant skill gap reported on the survey.

Everyone left the office. Work as we know it is fundamentally altered for a generation or more. Cloud services shot up in popularity by enabling the transition. And yet there is a gap – a prominent gap – in skilling up for this critically important future. What is the cloud manager to do?

Per the framework presented here, that manager has three essential options. They may take somewhat different forms depending on specific requirements and the quirks of the local market, but the options are:

  1. Train or hire internal resources: This might be easier said than done, especially for more niche skills, but makes sense for workloads that are critical to operations for the long term.
  2. Engage a managed service provider: MSPs are often engaged to manage services where internal IT lacks bandwidth or expertise.
  3. Hire a consultant: Consultants are great for time-bound implementation projects where highly specific expertise is required, such as a migration or implementation project.

Each model makes sense to some degree. When evaluating individual workloads for cloud suitability, it is critical to consider the support model – both immediate and long term. What makes sense from a value perspective?

Cloud decisions – summary

A key component of the Info-Tech cloud vision model is that it is multi-layered. Not every decision must be made at every level. At the workload level, it makes sense to select service models that make sense, but each workload does not need its own defined vision. Workload-level decisions should be guided by an overall strategy but applied tactically, based on individual workload characteristics and circumstances.

Conversely, some decisions will inevitably be applied at the environment level. With some exceptions, it is unlikely that cloud customers will build an entire private/hybrid cloud environment around a single solution; instead, they will define a broader strategy and fit individual workloads into that strategy.

Some considerations exist at both the workload and environment levels. Risks and roadblocks, as well as the preferred support model, are concerns that exist at both the environment level and at the workload level.

The image is a Venn diagram, with the left side titled Workload level, and the right side titled Environment Level. In the left section are: service model and migration path. On the right section are: Overall vision and Delivery model. In the centre section are: support model and Risks and roadblocks.

Step 1.3

Create a current state summary

Activities

1.3.1 Record your current state

Understand the Cloud

Generate goals and drivers

Explore cloud characteristics

Create a current state summary

Select workloads for analysis

This step involves the following participants: Core working group

Outcomes of this step

  • Current state summary of cloud solutions

1.3.1 Record your current state

30 minutes

Input

  • Knowledge of existing cloud workloads

Output

  • Current state cloud summary for service, delivery, and support models

Materials

  • Whiteboard

Participants

  • Core working group
  • Infrastructure team
  • Service owners
  1. On a whiteboard (real or virtual) draw a table with each of the cloud service models across the top. Leave a cell below each to list examples.
  2. Under each service model, record examples present in your environment. The purpose of the exercise is to illustrate the existence of cloud services in your environment or the lack thereof, so there is no need to be exhaustive. Complete this in turn for each service model until you are satisfied that you have created an effective picture of your current cloud SaaS state, IaaS state, etc.
  3. Input the results into their own slide titled “current state summary” in the Cloud Vision Executive Presentation.
  4. Repeat for the cloud delivery models and support models and include the results of those exercises as well.
  5. Create a short summary statement (“We are primarily a public cloud consumer with a large SaaS footprint and minimal presence in PaaS and IaaS. We retain an MSP to manage our hosted telephony solution; otherwise, everything is handled in house.”

Cloud Vision Executive Presentation

Step 1.4

Select workloads for current analysis

Activities

1.4.1 Select workloads for assessment

This step involves the following participants:

  • Core working group

Outcomes of this step

  • List of workloads for assessment

Understand the cloud

Generate goals and drivers

Explore cloud characteristics

Create a current state summary

Select workloads for analysis

1.4.1 Select workloads for assessment

30 minutes

Input

  • Knowledge of existing cloud workloads

Output

  • List of workloads to be assessed

Materials

  • Whiteboard
  • Cloud Vision Workbook

Participants

  • Core working group
  • IT management
  1. In many cases, the cloud project is inspired by a desire to move a particular workload or set of workloads. Solicit feedback from the core working group about what these workloads might be. Ask everyone in the meeting to suggest a workload and record each one on a sticky note or white board (virtual or physical).
  2. Discuss the results with the group and begin grouping similar workloads together. They will be subject to the assessments in the Cloud Vision Workbook, so try to avoid selecting too many workloads that will produce similar answers. It might not be obvious, but try to think about workloads that have similar usage patterns, risk levels, and performance requirements, and select a representative group.
  3. You should embrace counterintuition by selecting a workload that you think is unlikely to be a good fit for the cloud if you can and subjecting it to the assessment as well for validation purposes.
  4. When you have a list of 4-6 workloads, record them on tab 2 of the Cloud Vision Workbook.

Cloud Vision Workbook

Assess your cloud workloads

Build the foundations of your cloud vision

Phase 2

Phase 2

Evaluate Cloud Workloads

Phase 1

1.1 Generate goals and drivers

1.2 Explore cloud characteristics

1.3 Create a current state summary

1.4 Select workloads for analysis

Phase 2

2.1 Conduct workload assessments

2.2 Determine workload future states

Phase 3

3.1 Generate risks and roadblocks

3.2 Mitigate risks and roadblocks

3.3 Define roadmap initiatives

Phase 4

4.1 Review and assign work items

4.2 Finalize cloud decision framework

4.3 Create cloud vision

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

  • Conduct workload assessments
  • Determine workload future state

This phase involves the following participants:

  • Subject matter experts
  • Core working group
  • IT management

Define Your Cloud Vision

Work from the bottom up and assess your workloads

A workload-first approach will help you create a realistic vision.

The concept of a cloud vision should unquestionably be informed by the nature of the workloads that IT is expected to provide for the wider organization. The overall cloud vision is no greater than the sum of its parts. You cannot migrate to the cloud in the abstract. Workloads need to go – and not all workloads are equally suitable for the transition.

It is therefore imperative to understand which workloads are a good fit for the cloud, which cloud service models make the most sense, how to execute the migration, what support should look like, and what risks and roadblocks you are likely to encounter as part of the process.

That’s where the Cloud Vision Workbook comes into play. You can use this tool to assess as many workloads as you’d like – most people get the idea after about four – and by the end of the exercise, you should have a pretty good idea about where your workloads belong, and you’ll have a tool to assess any net new or previously unconsidered workloads.

It’s not so much about the results of the assessment – though these are undeniably important – but about the learnings gleaned from the collaborative assessment exercise. While you can certainly fill out the assessment without any additional input, this exercise is most effective when completed as part of a group.

Introducing the Cloud Vision Workbook

  • The Cloud Vision Workbook is an Excel tool that answers the age old question: “What should I do with my workloads?”
  • It is divided into eight tabs, each of which offers unique value. Start by reading the introduction and inputting your list of workloads. Work your way through tabs 3-6, completing the suitability, migration, management, and risk and roadblock assessments, and review the results on tab 7.
  • If you choose to go through the full battery of assessments for each workload, expect to answer and weight 111 unique questions across the four assessments. This is an intensive exercise, so carefully consider which assessments are valuable to you, and what workloads you have time to assess.
  • Tab 8 hosts the milestone timeline and captures the results of the phase 3 risk and mitigation exercise.

Understand Cloud Vision Workbook outputs

The image shows a graphic with several graphs and lists on it, with sections highlighted with notes. At the top, there's the title Database with the note Workload title (populated from tab 2). Below that, there is a graph with the note Relative suitability of the five service models. The Risks and roadblocks section includes the note: The strategy components – the risks and roadblocks – are captured relative to one another to highlight key focus areas. To the left of that, there is a Notes section with the note Notes populated based on post-assessment discussion. At the bottom, there is a section titled Where should skills be procured?, with the note The radar diagram captures the recommended support model relative to the others (MSP, consultant, internal IT). To the right of that, there is a section titled Migration path, with the note that Ordered list of migration paths. Note: a disconnect here with the suggested service model may indicate an unrealistic goal state.

Step 2.1

Conduct workload assessments

Activities

2.1.1 Conduct workload assessments

2.1.2 Interpret your results

Phase Title

Conduct workload assessments

Determine workload future state

This step involves the following participants:

  • Core working group
  • Workload subject matter experts

Outcomes of this step

  • Completed workload assessments

2.1.1 Conduct workload assessments

2 hours per workload

Input

  • List of workloads to be assessed

Output

  • Completed cloud vision assessments

Materials

  • Cloud Vision Workbook

Participants

  • Core working group
  • Service owners/workload SMEs
  1. The Cloud Vision Workbook is your one stop shop for all things workload assessment. Open the tool to tab 2 and review the workloads you identified at the end of phase 1. Ensure that these are correct. Once satisfied, project the tool (virtually, if necessary) so that all participants can see the assessment questions.
  2. Work through tabs 3-6, answering the questions and assigning a multiplier for each one. A higher multiplier increases the relative weight of the question, giving it a greater impact on the overall outcome.
  3. Do your best to induce participants to offer opinions. Consensus is not absolutely necessary, but it is a good goal. Ask your participants if they agree with initial responses and occasionally take the opposite position (“I’m surprised you said agree – I would have thought we didn’t care about CapEx vs. OpEx”). Stimulate discussion.
  4. Highlight any questions that you will need to return to or run by someone not present. Include a placeholder answer, as the tool requires all cells to be filled for computation.

Cloud Vision Workbook

2.1.2 Interpret your results

10 minutes

Input

  • Completed cloud vision assessments

Output

  • Shared understanding of implications

Materials

  • Cloud Vision Workbook

Participants

  • Core working group
  • Service owners/workload SMEs
  1. Once you’ve completed all 111 questions for each workload, you can review your results on tab 7. On tab 7, you will see four populated graphics: cloud suitability, migration path, “where should skills be procured?”, and risks and roadblocks. These represent the components of the overall cloud vision that you will present to stakeholders.
  2. The “cloud suitability” chart captures the service model that the assessment judges to be most suitable for the workload. Ask those present if any are surprised by the output. If there is any disagreement, discuss the source of the surprise and what a more realistic outcome would be. Revisit the assessment if necessary.
  3. Conduct a similar exercise with each of the other outputs. Does it make sense to refactor the workload based on its cloud suitability? Does the fact that we scored so highly on the “consultant” support model indicate something about how we handle upskilling internally? Does the profile of risks and roadblocks identified here align with expectations? What should be ranked higher? What about lower?
  4. Once everyone is generally satisfied with the results, close the tool and take a break! You’ve earned it.

Cloud Vision Workbook

Understand the cloud strategy components

Each cloud strategy will take a slightly different form, but all should contain echoes of each of these components. This process will help you define your vision and direction, but you will need to take steps to execute on that vision. The remainder of the cloud strategy, covered in the related blueprint Document Your Cloud Strategy comprises these fourteen topics divided across three categories: people, governance, and technology. The workload assessment covers these under risks and roadblocks and highlights areas that may require specific additional attention. When interpreting the results, think of these areas as comprising things that you will need to do to make your vision a reality.

People

  • Skills and roles
  • Culture and adoption
  • Governing bodies

Governance

  • Architecture
  • Integration and interoperability
  • Operations management
  • Cloud portfolio management
  • Cloud vendor management
  • Finance management
  • Security
  • Data controls

Technology

  • Monitoring
  • Provisioning
  • Migration

Strategy component: People

People form the core of any good strategy. As part of your cloud vision, you will need to understand the implications a cloud transition will have on your staff and users, whether those users are internal or external.

Component Description Challenges
Skills and roles The move to the cloud will require staff to learn how to handle new technology and new operational processes. The cloud is a different way of procuring IT resources and may require the definition of new roles to handle things like cost management and provisioning. Staff may not have the necessary experience to migrate to a cloud environment or to effectively manage resources once the cloud transition is made. Cloud skills are difficult to hire for, and with the ever-changing nature of the platforms themselves, this shows no sign of abating. Redefining roles can also be politically challenging and should be done with due care and consideration.
Culture and adoption If you build it, they will come…right? It is not always the case that a new service immediately attracts users. Ensuring that organizational culture aligns with the cloud vision is a critical success factor. Equally important is ensuring that cloud resources are used as intended. Those unfamiliar with cloud resources may be less willing to learn to use them. If alternatives exist (e.g. a legacy service that has not been shut down), or if those detractors are influential, this resistance may impede your cloud execution. Also, if the cloud transition involves significant effort or a fundamental rework (e.g. a DevOps transition) this role redefinition could cause some internal turmoil.
Governing bodies A large-scale cloud deployment requires formal governance. Formal governance requires a governing body that is ultimately responsible for designing the said governance. This could take the form of a “center of excellence” or may rest with a single cloud architect in a smaller, less complicated environment. Governance is difficult. Defining responsibilities in a way that includes all relevant stakeholders without paralyzing the decision-making process is difficult. Implementing suggestions is a challenge. Navigating the changing nature of service provision (who can provision their own instances or assign licenses?) can be difficult as well. All these concerns must be addressed in a cloud strategy.

Strategy component: Governance

Without guardrails, the cloud deployment will grow organically. This has strengths (people tend to adopt solutions that they select and deploy themselves), but these are more than balanced out by the drawbacks that come with inconsistency, poor administration, duplication of services, suboptimal costing, and any number of other unique challenges. The solution is to develop and deploy governance. The following list captures some of the necessary governance-related components of a cloud strategy.

Component Description Challenges
Architecture Enterprise architecture is an important function in any environment with more than one interacting workload component (read: any environment). The cloud strategy should include an approach to defining and implementing a standard cloud architecture and should assign responsibility to an individual or group. Sometimes the cloud transition is inspired by the desire to rearchitect. The necessary skills and knowledge may not be readily available to design and transition to a microservices-based environment, for example, vs. a traditional monolithic application architecture. The appropriateness of a serverless environment may not be well understood, and it may be the case that architects are unfamiliar with cloud best practices and reference architectures.
Integration and interoperability Many services are only highly functional when integrated with other services. What is a database without its front-end? What is an analytics platform without its data lake? For the cloud vision to be properly implemented, a strategy for handling integration and interoperability must be developed. It may be as simple as “all SaaS apps must be compatible with Okta” but it must be there. Migration to the cloud may require a fundamentally new approach to integration, moving away from a point-to-point integrations and towards an ESB or data lake. In many cases, this is easier said than done. Centralization of management may be appealing, but legacy applications – or those acquired informally in a one-off fashion – might not be so easy to integrate into a central management platform.
Operations management Service management (ITIL processes) must be aligned with your overall cloud strategy. Migrating to the cloud (where applicable) will require refining these processes, including incident, problem, request, change, and configuration management, to make them more suitable for the cloud environment. Operations management doesn’t go away in the cloud, but it does change in line with the transition to shared responsibility. Responding to incidents may be more difficult on the cloud when troubleshooting is a vendor’s responsibility. Change management in a SaaS environment may be more receptive than staff are used to as cloud providers push changes out that cannot be rolled back.

Strategy component: Governance (cont.)

Component Description Challenges
Cloud portfolio management This component refers to the act of managing the portfolio of cloud services that is available to IT and to business users. What requirements must a SaaS service meet to be onboarded into the environment? How do we account for exceptions to our IaaS policy? What about services that are only available from a certain provider? Rationalizing services offers administrative benefits, but may make some tasks more difficult for end users who have learned things a certain way or rely on niche toolsets. Managing access through a service catalog can also be challenging based on buy-in and ongoing administration. It is necessary to develop and implement policy.
Cloud vendor management Who owns the vendor management function, and what do their duties entail? What contract language must be standard? What does due diligence look like? How should negotiations be conducted? What does a severing of the relationship look like? Cloud service models are generally different from traditional hosted software and even from each other (e.g. SaaS vs. PaaS). There is a bit of a learning curve when it comes to dealing with vendors. Also relevant: the skills that it takes to build and maintain a system are not necessarily the same as those required to coherently interact with a cloud vendor.
Finance management Cloud services are, by definition, subject to a kind of granular, operational billing that many shops might not be used to. Someone will need to accurately project and allocate costs, while ensuring that services are monitored for cost abnormalities. Cloud cost challenges often relate to overall expense (“the cloud is more expensive than an alternative solution”), expense variability (“I don’t know what my budget needs to be this quarter”), and cost complexity (“I don’t understand what I’m paying for – what’s an Elastic Beanstalk?”).
Security The cloud is not inherently more or less secure than a premises-based alternative, though the risk profile can be different. Applying appropriate security governance to ensure workloads are compliant with security requirements is an essential component of the strategy.

Technical security architecture can be a challenge, as well as navigating the shared responsibility that comes with a cloud transition. There are also a plethora of cloud-specific security tools like cloud access security brokers (CASBs), cloud security posture management (CSPM) solutions, and even secure access services edge (SASE) technology.

Data controls Data residency, classification, quality, and protection are important considerations for any cloud strategy. With cloud providers taking on outsized responsibility, understanding and governing data is essential. Cloud providers like to abstract away from the end user, and while some may be able to guarantee residency, others may not. Additionally, regulations may prevent some data from going to the cloud, and you may need to develop a new organizational backup strategy to account for the cloud.

Strategy component: Technology

Good technology will never replace good people and effective process, but it remains important in its own right. A migration that neglects the undeniable technical components of a solid cloud strategy is doomed to mediocrity at best and failure at worst. Understanding the technical implications of the cloud vision – particularly in terms of monitoring, provisioning, and migration – makes all the difference. You can interpret the results of the cloud workload assessments by reviewing the details presented here.

Component Description Challenges
Monitoring The cloud must be monitored in line with performance requirements. Staff must ensure that appropriate tools are in place to properly monitor cloud workloads and that they are capturing adequate and relevant data. Defining requirements for monitoring a potentially unfamiliar environment can be difficult, as can consolidating on a monitoring solution that both meets requirements and covers all relevant areas. There may be some upskilling and integration work required to ensure that monitoring works as required.
Provisioning How will provisioning be done? Who will be responsible for ensuring the right people have access to the right resources? What tooling must be deployed to support provisioning goals? What technical steps must be taken to ensure that the provisioning is as seamless as possible? There is the inevitable challenge of assigning responsibility and accountability in a changing infrastructure and operations environment, especially if the changes are substantial (e.g. a fundamental operating model shift, reoriented around the cloud). Staff may also need to familiarize themselves with cloud-based provisioning tools like Ansible, Terraform, or even CloudFormation.
Migration The act of migrating is important as well. In some cases, the migration is as simple as configuring the new environment and turning it up (e.g. with a net new SaaS service). In other cases, the migration itself can be a substantial undertaking, involving large amounts of data, a complicated replatforming/refactoring, and/or a significant configuration exercise.

Not all migration journeys are created equal, and challenges include a general lack of understanding of the requirements of a migration, the techniques that might be necessary to migrate to a particular cloud (there are many) and the disruption/risk associated with moving large amounts of data. All of these challenges must be considered as part of the overall cloud strategy, whether in terms of architectural principles or skill acquisition (or both!).

Step 2.2

Determine workload future state

Activities

2.2.1 Determine workload future state

Conduct workload assessments

Determine workload future state

This step involves the following participants:

  • IT management
  • Core working group

Outcomes of this step

  • Completed workload assessments
  • Defined workload future state

2.2.1 Determine workload future state

1-3 hours

Input

  • Completed workload assessments

Output

  • Preliminary future state outputs

Materials

  • Cloud Vision Workbook
  • Cloud Vision Executive Presentation

Participants

  • Core working group
  • Service owners
  • IT management
  1. After you’ve had a chance to validate your results, refer to tab 7 of the tool, where you will find a blank notes section.
  2. With the working group, capture your answers to each of the following questions:
    1. What service model is the most suitable for the workload? Why?
    2. How will we conduct the migration? Which of the six models makes the most sense? Do we have a backup plan if our primary plan doesn’t work out?
    3. What should the support model look like?
    4. What are some workload-specific risks and considerations that must be taken into account for the workload?
  3. Once you’ve got answers to each of these questions for each of the workloads, include your summary in the “notes” section of tab 7.

Cloud Vision Executive Presentation

Paste the output into the Cloud Vision Executive Presentation

  • The Cloud Vision Workbook output is a compact, consumable summary of each workload’s planned future state. Paste each assessment in as necessary.
  • There is no absolutely correct way to present the information, but the output is a good place to start. Do note that, while the presentation is designed to lead with the vision statement, because the process is workload-first, the assessments are populated prior to the overall vision in a bottom-up manner.
  • Be sure to anticipate the questions you are likely to receive from any stakeholders. You may consider preparing for questions like: “What other workloads fit this profile?” “What do we expect the impact on the budget to be?” “How long will this take?” Keep these and other questions in mind as you progress through the vision definition process.

The image shows the Cloud Vision Workbook output, which was described in an annotated version in an earlier section.

Info-Tech Insight

Keep your audience in mind. You may want to include some additional context in the presentation if the results are going to be presented to non-technical stakeholders or those who are not familiar with the terms or how to interpret the outputs.

Identify and Mitigate Risks

Build the foundations of your cloud vision

PHASE 3

Phase 3

Identify and Mitigate Risks

Phase 1

1.1 Generate goals and drivers

1.2 Explore cloud characteristics

1.3 Create a current state summary

1.4 Select workloads for analysis

Phase 2

2.1 Conduct workload assessments

2.2 Determine workload future states

Phase 3

3.1 Generate risks and roadblocks

3.2 Mitigate risks and roadblocks

3.3 Define roadmap initiatives

Phase 4

4.1 Review and assign work items

4.2 Finalize cloud decision framework

4.3 Create cloud vision

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

  • Generate risks and roadblocks
  • Mitigate risks and roadblocks
  • Define roadmap initiatives

This phase involves the following participants:

  • Core working group
  • Workload subject matter experts

You know what you want to do, but what do you have to do?

What questions remain unanswered?

There are workload-level risks and roadblocks, and there are environment-level risks. This phase is focused primarily on environment-level risks and roadblocks, or those that are likely to span multiple workloads (but this is not hard and fast rule – anything that you deem worth discussing is worth discussing). The framework here calls for an open forum where all stakeholders – technical and non-technical, pro-cloud and anti-cloud, management and individual contributor – have an opportunity to articulate their concerns, however specific or general, and receive feedback and possible mitigation.

Start by soliciting feedback. You can do this over time or in a single session. Encourage anyone with an opinion to share it. Focus on those who are likely to have a perspective that will become relevant at some point during the creation of the cloud strategy and the execution of any migration. Explain the preliminary direction; highlight any major changes that you foresee. Remind participants that you are not looking for solutions (yet), but that you want to make sure you hear any and every concern as early as possible. You will get feedback and it will all be valuable.

Before cutting your participants loose, remind them that, as with all business decisions, the cloud comes with trade-offs. Not everyone will have every wish fulfilled, and in some cases, significant effort may be needed to get around a roadblock, risks may need to be accepted, and workloads that looked like promising candidates for one service model or another may not be able to realize that potential. This is a normal and expected part of the cloud vision process.

Once the risks and roadblocks conversation is complete, it is the core working group’s job to propose and validate mitigations. Not every risk can be completely resolved, but the cloud has been around for decades – chances are someone else has faced a similar challenge and made it through relatively unscathed. That work will inevitably result in initiatives for immediate execution. Those initiatives will form the core of the initiative roadmap that accompanies the completed Cloud Vision Executive Presentation.

Step 3.1

Generate risks and roadblocks

Activities

3.1.1 Generate risks and roadblocks

3.1.2 Generate mitigations

Identify and mitigate risks

Generate risks and roadblocks

Mitigate risks and roadblocks

Define roadmap initiatives

This step involves the following participants:

  • Core working group
  • IT management
  • Infrastructure
  • Applications
  • Security
  • Architecture

Outcomes of this step

  • List of risks and roadblocks

Understand risks and roadblocks

Risk

  • Something that could potentially go wrong.
  • You can respond to risks by mitigating them:
    • Eliminate: take action to prevent the risk from causing issues.
    • Reduce: take action to minimize the likelihood/severity of the risk.
    • Transfer: shift responsibility for the risk away from IT, towards another division of the company.
    • Accept: where the likelihood or severity is low, it may be prudent to accept that the risk could come to fruition.

Roadblock

  • There are things that aren’t “risks” that we care about when migrating to the cloud.
  • We know, for example, that a complicated integration situation will create work items for any migration – this is not an “unknown.”
  • We respond to roadblocks by generating work items.

3.1.1 Generate risks and roadblocks

1.5 hours

Input

  • Completed cloud vision assessments

Output

  • List of risks and roadblocks

Materials

  • Whiteboard
  • Sticky notes

Participants

  • Core working group
  • Service owners/workload SMEs
  • Anyone with concerns about the cloud
  1. Gather your core working group – and really anyone with an intelligent opinion on the cloud – into a single meeting space. Give the group 5-10 minutes to list anything they think could present a difficulty in transitioning workloads to the cloud. Write each risk/roadblock on its own sticky note. You will never be 100% exhaustive, but don’t let anything your users care about go unaddressed.
  2. Once everyone has had time to write down their risks and roadblocks, have everyone share one by one. Make sure you get them all. Overlap in risks and roadblocks is okay! Group similar concerns together to give a sort of heat map of what your participants are concerned about. (This is called “affinity diagramming.”)
  3. Assign names to these categories. Many of these categories will align with the strategy components discussed in the previous phase (governance, security, etc.) but some will be specific whether by nature or by degree.
  4. Sort each of the individual risks into its respective category, collapsing any exact duplicates, and leaving room for notes and mitigations (see the next slide for a visual).

Understand risks and roadblocks

The image is two columns--on the left, the column is titled Affinity Diagramming. Below the title, there are many colored blocks, randomly arranged. There is an arrow pointing right, to the same coloured blocks, now sorted by colour. In the right column--titled Categorization--each colour has been assigned a category, with subcategories.

Step 3.2

Mitigate risks and roadblocks

Activities

3.2.1 Generate mitigations

Identify and mitigate risks

Generate risks and roadblocks

Mitigate risks and roadblocks

Define roadmap initiatives

This step involves the following participants:

  • Core working group

Outcomes of this step

  • List of mitigations

Is the public cloud less secure?

This is the key risk-related question that most cloud customers will have to answer at some point: does migrating to the cloud for some services increase their exposure and create a security problem?

As with all good questions, the answer is “it depends.” But what does it depend on? Consider these cloud risks and potential mitigations:

  1. Misconfiguration: An error grants access to unauthorized parties (as happened to Capital One in 2019). This can be mitigated by careful configuration management and third-party tooling.
  2. Unauthorized access by cloud provider/partner employees: Though rare, it is possible that a cloud provider or partner can be a vector for a breach. Careful contract language, choosing to own your own encryption keys, and a hybrid approach (storing data on-premises) are some possible ways to address this problem.
  3. Unauthorized access to systems: Cloud services are designed to be accessed from anywhere and may be accessed by malicious actors. Possible mitigations include risk-based conditional access, careful identity access management, and logging and detection.

“The cloud is definitely more secure in that you have much more control, you have much more security tooling, much more visibility, and much more automation. So it is more secure. The caveat is that there is more risk. It is easier to accidentally expose data in the cloud than it is on-premises, but, especially for security, the amount of tooling and visibility you get in cloud is much more than anything we’ve had in our careers on-premises, and that’s why I think cloud in general is more secure.” –Abdul Kittana, Founder, ASecureCloud

Breach bests bank

No cloud provider can protect against every misconfiguration

Industry: Finance

Source: The New York Times, CNET

Background

Capital One is a major Amazon Web Services customer and is even featured on Amazon’s site as a case study. That case study emphasizes the bank’s commitment to the cloud and highlights how central security and compliance were. From the CTO: “Before we moved a single workload, we engaged groups from across the company to build a risk framework for the cloud that met the same high bar for security and compliance that we meet in our on-premises environments. AWS worked with us every step of the way.”

Complication

The cloud migration was humming along until July 2019, when the bank suffered a serious breach at the hands of a hacker. That hacker was able to steal millions of credit card applications and hundreds of thousands of Social Security numbers, bank account numbers, and Canadian social insurance numbers.

According to investigators and to AWS, the breach was caused by an open reverse proxy attack against a misconfigured web app firewall, not by an underlying vulnerability in the cloud infrastructure.

Results

Capital One reported that the breach was expected to cost it $150 million, and AWS fervently denied any blame. The US Senate got involved, as did national media, and Capital One’s CEO issued a public apology, writing, “I sincerely apologize for the understandable worry this incident must be causing those affected, and I am committed to making it right.”

It was a bad few months for IT at Capital One.

3.2.1 Generate mitigations

3-4.5 hours

Input

  • Completed cloud vision assessments

Output

  • List of risks and roadblocks

Materials

  • Whiteboard
  • Sticky notes

Participants

  • Core working group
  • Service owners/workload SMEs
  • Anyone with concerns about the cloud
  1. Recall the four mitigation strategies: eliminate, reduce, transfer, or accept. Keep these in mind as you work through the list of risks and roadblocks with the core working group. For every individual risk or roadblock raised in the initial generation session, suggest a specific mitigation. If the concern is “SaaS providers having access to confidential information,” a mitigation might be encryption, specific contract language, or proof of certifications (or all the above).
  2. Work through this for each of the risks and roadblocks, identifying the steps you need to take that would satisfy your requirements as you understand them.
  3. Once you have gone through the whole list – ideally with input from SMEs in particular areas like security, engineering, and compliance/legal – populate the Cloud Vision Workbook (tab 8) with the risks, roadblocks, and mitigations (sorted by category). Review tab 8 for an example of the output of this exercise.

Cloud Vision Workbook

Cloud Vision Workbook – mitigations

The image shows a large chart titled Risks, roadblocks, and mitigations, which has been annotated with notes.

Step 3.3

Define roadmap initiatives

Activities

3.3.1 Generate roadmap initiatives

Identify and mitigate risks

Generate risks and roadblocks

Mitigate risks and roadblocks

Define roadmap initiatives

This step involves the following participants:

  • Core working group

Outcomes of this step

  • Defined roadmap initiatives

3.3.1 Generate roadmap initiatives

1 hour

Input

  • List of risk and roadblock mitigations

Output

  • List of cloud initiatives

Materials

  • Cloud Vision Workbook

Participants

  • Core working group
  1. Executing on your cloud vision will likely require you to undertake some key initiatives, many of which have already been identified as part of your mitigation exercise. On tab 8 of the Cloud Vision Workbook, review the mitigations you created in response to the risks and roadblocks identified. Initiatives should generally be assignable to a party and should have a defined scope/duration. For example, “assess all net new applications for cloud suitability” might not be counted as an initiative, but “design a cloud application assessment” would likely be.
  2. Design a timeline appropriate for your specific needs. Generally short-term (less than 3 months), medium-term (3-6 months), and long-term (greater than 6 months) will work, but this is entirely based on preference.
  3. Review and validate the parameters with the working group. Consider creating additional color-coding (highlighting certain tasks that might be dependent on a decision or have ongoing components).

Cloud Vision Workbook

Bridge the gap and create the vision

Build the foundations of your cloud vision

Phase 4

Phase 4

Bridge the Gap and Create the Vision

Phase 1

1.1 Generate goals and drivers

1.2 Explore cloud characteristics

1.3 Create a current state summary

1.4 Select workloads for analysis

Phase 2

2.1 Conduct workload assessments

2.2 Determine workload future states

Phase 3

3.1 Generate risks and roadblocks

3.2 Mitigate risks and roadblocks

3.3 Define roadmap initiatives

Phase 4

4.1 Review and assign work items

4.2 Finalize cloud decision framework

4.3 Create cloud vision

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

  • Assign initiatives and propose timelines
  • Build a delivery model rubric
  • Build a service model rubric
  • Built a support model rubric
  • Create a cloud vision statement
  • Map cloud workloads
  • Complete the Cloud Vision presentation

This phase involves the following participants:

  • IT management, the core working group, security, infrastructure, operations, architecture, engineering, applications, non-IT stakeholders

Step 4.1

Review and assign work items

Activities

4.1.1 Assign initiatives and propose timelines

Bridge the gap and create the vision

Review and assign work items

Finalize cloud decision framework

Create cloud vision

This step involves the following participants:

  • Core working group
  • IT management

Outcomes of this step

  • Populated cloud vision roadmap

4.1.1 Assign initiatives and propose timelines

1 hour

Input

  • List of cloud initiatives

Output

  • Initiatives assigned by responsibility and timeline

Materials

  • Cloud Vision Workbook

Participants

  • Core working group
  1. Once the list is populated, begin assigning responsibility for execution. This is not a RACI exercise, so focus on the functional responsibility. Once you have determined who is responsible, assign a timeline and include any notes. This will form the basis of a more formal project plan.
  2. To assign the initiative to a party, consider 1) who will be responsible for execution and 2) if that responsibility will be shared. Be as specific as possible, but be sure to be consistent to make it easier for you to sort responsibility later on.
  3. When assigning timelines, we suggest including the end date (when you expect the project to be complete) rather than the start date, though whatever you choose, be sure to be consistent. Make use of the notes column to record anything that you think any other readers will need to be aware of in the future, or details that may not be possible to commit to memory.

Cloud Vision Workbook

Step 4.2

Finalize cloud decision framework

Activities

4.2.1 Build a delivery model rubric

4.2.2 Build a service model rubric

4.2.3 Build a support model rubric

Bridge the gap and create the vision

Review and assign work items

Finalize cloud decision framework

Create cloud vision

This step involves the following participants:

  • Core working group

Outcomes of this step

  • Cloud decision framework

4.2.1 Build a delivery model rubric

1 hour

Input

  • List of cloud initiatives

Output

  • Initiatives assigned by responsibility and timeline

Materials

Participants

  • Core working group
  1. Now that we have a good understanding of the cloud’s key characteristics, the relative suitability of different workloads for the cloud, and a good understanding of some of the risks and roadblocks that may need to be overcome if a cloud transition is to take place, it is time to formalize a delivery model rubric. Start by listing the delivery models on a white board vertically – public, private, hybrid, and multi-cloud. Include a community cloud option as well if that is feasible for you. Strike any models that do not figure into your vision.
  2. Create a table style rubric for each delivery model. Confer with the working group to determine what characteristics best define workloads suitable for each model. If you have a hybrid cloud option, you may consider workloads that are highly dynamic; a private cloud hosted on-premises may be more suitable for workloads that have extensive regulatory requirements.
  3. Once the table is complete, include it in the Cloud Vision Executive Presentation.

Cloud Vision Executive Presentation

Vision for the cloud future state (example)

Delivery model Decision criteria
Public cloud
  • Public cloud is the primary destination for all workloads as the goal is to eliminate facilities and infrastructure management
  • Offers features, broad accessibility, and managed updates along with provider-managed facilities and hardware
Legacy datacenter
  • Any workload that is not a good fit for the public cloud
  • Dependency (like a USB key for license validation)
  • Performance requirements (e.g. workloads highly sensitive to transaction thresholds)
  • Local infrastructure components (firewall, switches, NVR)

Summary statement: Everything must go! Public cloud is a top priority. Anything that is not compatible (for whatever reason) with a public cloud deployment will be retained in a premises-based server closet (downgraded from a full datacenter). The private cloud does not align with the overall organizational vision, nor does a hybrid solution.

4.2.2 Build a service model rubric

1 hour

Input

  • Output of workload assessments
  • Output of risk and mitigation exercise

Output

  • Service model rubric

Materials

  • Whiteboard
  • Cloud Vision Executive Presentation

Participants

  • Core working group
  1. This next activity is like the delivery model activity, but covers the relevant cloud service models. On a whiteboard, make a vertical list of the cloud service models (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.) that will be considered for workloads. If you have an order of preference, place your most preferred at the top, your least preferred at the bottom.
  2. Describe the circumstances under which you would select each service model. Do your best to focus on differentiators. If a decision criterion appears for multiple service models, consider refining or excluding it. (For additional information, check out Info-Tech’s Reimagine IT Operations for a Cloud-First World blueprint.)
  3. Create a summary statement to capture your overall service model position. See the next slide for an example. Note: this can be incorporated into your cloud vision statement, so be sure that it reflects your genuine cloud preferences.
  4. Record the results in the Cloud Vision Executive Presentation.

Cloud Vision Executive Presentation

Vision for the cloud future state (example)

Service model Decision criteria
SaaS

SaaS first; opt for SaaS when:

  • A SaaS option exists that meets all key business requirements
  • There is a strong desire to have someone else (the vendor) manage infrastructure components/the platform
  • Not particularly sensitive to performance thresholds
  • The goal is to transition management of the workload outside of IT
  • SaaS is the only feasible way to consume the desired service
PaaS
  • Highly customized service/workload – SaaS not feasible
  • Still preferable to offload as much management as possible to third parties
  • Customization required, but not at the platform level
  • The workload is built using a standard framework
  • We have the time/resources to replatform
IaaS
  • Service needs to be lifted and shifted out of the datacenter quickly
  • Customization is required at the platform level/there is value in managing components
  • There is no need to manage facilities
  • Performance is not impacted by hosting the workload offsite
  • There is value in right-sizing the workload over time
On-premises Anything that does not fit in the cloud for performance or other reasons (e.g. licensing key)

Summary statement: SaaS will be the primary service model. All workloads will migrate to the public cloud where possible. Anything that cannot be migrated to SaaS will be migrated to PaaS. IaaS is a transitory step.

4.2.3 Build a support model rubric

1 hour

Input

  • Results of the cloud workload assessments

Output

  • Support model rubric

Materials

  • Whiteboard
  • Cloud Vision Executive Presentation

Participants

  • Core working group
  1. The final rubric covered here is that for the support model. Where will you procure the skills necessary to ensure the vision’s proper execution? Much like the other rubric activities, write the three support models vertically (in order of preference, if you have one) on a whiteboard.
  2. Next to each model, describe the circumstances under which you would select each support model. Focus on the dimensions: the duration of the engagement, specialization required, and flexibility required. If you have existing rules/practices around hiring consultants/MSPs, consider those as well.
  3. Once you have a good list of decision criteria, form a summary statement. This should encapsulate your position on support models and should mention any notable criteria that will contribute to most decisions.
  4. Record the results in the Cloud Vision Executive Presentation.

Cloud Vision Executive Presentation

Vision for the cloud future state (example)

Support model Decision criteria
Internal IT

The primary support model will be internal IT going forward

  • Chosen where the primary work required is administrative
  • Where existing staff can manage the service in the cloud easily and effectively
  • Where the chosen solution fits the SaaS service model
Consultant
  • Where the work required is time-bound (e.g. a migration/refactoring exercise)
  • Where the skills do not exist in house, and where the skills cannot easily be procured (specific technical expertise required in areas of the cloud unfamiliar to staff)
  • Where opportunities for staff to learn from consultant SMEs are valuable
  • Where ongoing management and maintenance can be handled in house
MSP
  • Where an ongoing relationship is valued
  • Where ongoing administration and maintenance are disproportionately burdensome on IT staff (or where this administration and maintenance is likely to be burdensome)
  • Where the managed services model has already been proven out
  • Where specific expertise in an area of technology is required but this does not rise to the need to hire an FTE (e.g. telephony)

Summary statement: Most workloads will be managed in house. A consultant will be employed to facilitate the transition to micro-services in a cloud container environment, but this will be transitioned to in-house staff. An MSP will continue to manage backups and telephony.

Step 4.3

Create cloud vision

Activities

4.3.1 Create a cloud vision statement

4.3.2 Map cloud workloads

4.3.3 Complete the Cloud Vision Presentation

Review and assign work items

Finalize cloud decision framework

Create cloud vision

This step involves the following participants:

  • Core working group
  • IT management

Outcomes of this step

Completed Cloud Vision Executive Presentation

4.3.1 Create a cloud vision statement

1 hour

Input

  • List of cloud initiatives

Output

  • Initiatives assigned by responsibility and timeline

Materials

  • Cloud Vision Workbook

Participants

  • Core working group
  1. Now that you know what service models are appropriate, it’s time to summarize your cloud vision in a succinct, consumable way. A good vision statement should have three components:
    • Scope: Which parts of the organization will the strategy impact?
    • Goal: What is the strategy intended to accomplish?
    • Key differentiator: What makes the new strategy special?
  2. On a whiteboard, make a chart with three columns (one column for each of the features of a good mission statement). Have the group generate a list of words to describe each of the categories. Ideally, the group will produce multiple answers for each category.
  3. Once you’ve gathered a few different responses for each category, have the team put their heads down and generate pithy mission statements that capture the sentiments underlying each category.
  4. Have participants read their vision statements in front of the group. Use the rest of the session to produce a final statement. Record the results in the Cloud Strategy Executive Presentation.

Example vision statement outputs

“IT at ACME Corp. hereby commits to providing clients and end users with an unparalleled, productivity-enabling technology experience, leveraging, insofar as it is possible and practical, cloud-based services.”

“At ACME Corp. our employees and customers are our first priority. Using new, agile cloud services, IT is devoted to eliminating inefficiency, providing cutting-edge solutions for a fast-paced world, and making a positive difference in the lives of our colleagues and the people we serve.”

As a global leader in technology, ACME Corp. is committed to taking full advantage of new cloud services, looking first to agile cloud options to optimize internal processes wherever efficiency gaps exist. Improved efficiency will allow associates to spend more time on ACME’s core mission: providing an unrivalled customer experience.”

Scope

Goal

Key differentiator

4.3.2 Map cloud workloads

1 hour

Input

  • List of workloads
  • List of acceptable service models
  • List of acceptable migration paths

Output

  • Workloads mapped by service model/migration path

Materials

  • Whiteboard
  • Sticky notes

Participants

  • Core working group
  1. Now that you have defined your overall cloud vision as well as your service model options, consider aligning your service model preferences with your migration path preferences. Draw a table with your expected migration strategies across the top (retain, retire, rehost, replatform, refactor, repurchase, or some of these) and your expected service models across the side.
  2. On individual sticky notes, write a list of workloads in your environment. In a smaller environment, this list can be exhaustive. Otherwise take advantage of the list you created as part of phase 1 along with any additional workloads that warrant discussion.
  3. As a group, go through the list, placing the sticky notes first in the appropriate row based on their characteristics and the decision criteria that have already been defined, and then in the appropriate column based on the appropriate migration path. (See the next slide for an example of what this looks like.)
  4. Record the results in the Cloud Vision Executive Presentation. Note: not every cell will be filled; some migration path/service model combinations are impossible or otherwise undesirable.

Cloud Vision Executive Presentation

Example cloud workload map

Repurchase Replatform Rehost Retain
SaaS

Office suite

AD

PaaS SQL Database
IaaS File Storage DR environment
Other

CCTV

Door access

4.3.3 Complete the Cloud Vision Presentation

1 hour

Input

  • List of cloud initiatives

Output

  • Initiatives assigned by responsibility and timeline

Materials

  • Cloud Vision Workbook

Participants

  • Core working group
  1. Open the Cloud Vision Executive Presentation to the second slide and review the templated executive brief. This comprises several sections (see the next slide). Populate each one:
    • Summary of the exercise
    • The cloud vision statement
    • Key cloud drivers
    • Risks and roadblocks
    • Top initiatives and next steps
  2. Review the remainder of the presentation. Be sure to elaborate on any significant initiatives and changes (where applicable) and to delete any slides that you no longer require.

Cloud Vision Workbook

Sample cloud vision executive summary

  • From [date to date], a cross-functional group representing IT and its constituents met to discuss the cloud.
  • Over the course of the week, the group identified drivers for cloud computing and developed a shared vision, evaluated several workloads through an assessment framework, identified risks, roadblocks, and mitigations, and finally generated initiatives and next steps.
  • From the process, the group produced a summary and a cloud suitability assessment framework that can be applied at the level of the workload.

Cloud Vision Statement

[Organization] will leverage public cloud solutions and retire existing datacenter and colocation facilities. This transition will simplify infrastructure administration, support, and security, while modernizing legacy infrastructure and reducing the need for additional capital expenditure.

Cloud Drivers Retire the datacenter Do more valuable work
Right-size the environment Reduce CapEx
Facilitate ease of mgmt. Work from anywhere
Reduce capital expenditure Take advantage of elasticity
Performance and availability Governance Risks and roadblocks
Security Rationalization
Cost Skills
Migration Remaining premises resources
BC, backup, and DR Control

Initiatives and next steps

  • Close the datacenter and colocation site in favor of a SaaS-first cloud approach.
  • Some workloads will migrate to infrastructure-as-a-service in the short term with the assistance of third-party consultants.

Document your cloud strategy

You did it!

Congratulations! If you’ve made it this far, you’ve successfully articulated a cloud vision, assessed workloads, developed an understanding (shared with your team and stakeholders) of cloud concepts, and mitigated risks and roadblocks that you may encounter along your cloud journey. From this exercise, you should understand your mission and vision, how your cloud plans will interact with any other relevant strategic plans, and what successful execution looks like, as well as developing a good understanding of overall guiding principles. These are several components of your overall strategy, but they do not comprise the strategy in its entirety.

How do you fix this?

First, validate the results of the vision exercise with your stakeholders. Socialize it and collect feedback. Make changes where you think changes should be made. This will become a key foundational piece. The next step is to formally document your cloud strategy. This is a separate project and is covered in the Info-Tech blueprint Document Your Cloud Strategy.

The vision exercise tells you where you want to go and offers some clues as to how to get there. The formal strategy exercise is a formal documentation of the target state, but also captures in detail the steps you’ll need to take, the processes you’ll need to refine, and the people you’ll need to hire.

A cloud strategy should comprise your organizational stance on how the cloud will change your approach to people and human resources, technology, and governance. Once you are confident that you can make and enforce decisions in these areas, you should consider moving on to Document Your Cloud Strategy. This blueprint, Define Your Cloud Vision, often serves as a prerequisite for the strategy documentation conversation(s).

Appendix

Summary of Accomplishment

Additional Support

Research Contributors

Related Info-Tech Research

Vendor Resources

Bibliography

Summary of Accomplishment

Problem Solved

You have now documented what you want from the cloud, what you mean when you say “cloud,” and some preliminary steps you can take to make your vision a reality.

You now have at your disposal a framework for identifying and evaluating candidates for their cloud suitability, as well as a series of techniques for generating risks and mitigations associated with your cloud journey. The next step is to formalize your cloud strategy using the takeaways from this exercise. You’re well on your way to a completed cloud strategy!

If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

Contact your account representative for more information.

workshops@infotech.com

1-888-670-8889

Additional Support

If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech Workshop.

Contact your account representative for more information.

workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.

Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.

The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

Generate drivers for cloud adoption

Work with stakeholders to understand the expected benefits of the cloud migration and how these drivers will impact the overall vision.

Conduct workload assessments

Assess your individual cloud workloads for their suitability as candidates for the cloud migration.

Bibliography

“2021 State of the Cloud Report.” Flexera, 2021. Web.

“2021 State of Upskilling Report.” Pluralsight, 2021. Web.

“AWS Snowmobile.” Amazon Web Services, n.d. Web.

“Azure products.” Microsoft, n.d. Web.

“Azure Migrate Documentation.” Microsoft, n.d. Web.

Bell, Harold. “Multi-Cloud vs. Hybrid Cloud: What’s the Difference?” Nutanix, 2019. Web.

“Cloud Products.” Amazon Web Services, n.d. Web.

“COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology.” ISACA, 2019. Web.

Edmead, Mark T. “Using COBIT 2019 to Plan and Execute an Organization’s Transformation Strategy.” ISACA, 2020. Web.

Flitter, Emily, and Karen Weise. “Capital One Data Breach Compromises Data of Over 100 Million.” The New York Times, 29 July 2019. Web.

Gillis, Alexander S. “Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM).” TechTarget, 2021. Web.

“’How to Cloud’ with Capital One.” Amazon Web Services, n.d. Web.

“IBM Closes Landmark Acquisition of Red Hat for $34 Billion; Defines Open, Hybrid Cloud Future.” Red Hat, 9 July 2019. Web.

Mell, Peter, and Timothy Grance. “The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing.” National Institute of Standards and Technology, Sept. 2011. Web.

Ng, Alfred. “Amazon Tells Senators it Isn't to Blame for Capital One Breach.” CNET, 2019. Web.

Orban, Stephen. “6 Strategies for Migrating Applications to the Cloud.” Amazon Web Services, 2016. Web.

Sullivan, Dan. “Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB).” TechTarget, 2021. Web.

“What Is Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)?” Cisco, n.d. Web.

Build a Cloud Security Strategy

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}169|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: 9.4/10 Overall Impact
  • member rating average dollars saved: $38,592 Average $ Saved
  • member rating average days saved: 44 Average Days Saved
  • Parent Category Name: Security Strategy & Budgeting
  • Parent Category Link: /security-strategy-and-budgeting
  • Leveraging the cloud introduces IT professionals to a new world that they are tasked with securing.
  • With many cloud vendors proposing to share the security responsibility, it can be a challenge for organizations to develop a clear understanding of how they can best secure their data off premises.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • Cloud security is not fundamentally different from security on premises.
  • While some of the mechanics are different, the underlying principles are the same. Accountability doesn’t disappear.
  • By virtue of its broad network accessibility, the cloud does expose decisions to extreme scrutiny, however.

Impact and Result

  • The business is adopting a cloud environment and it must be secured, which includes:
    • Ensuring business data cannot be leaked or stolen.
    • Maintaining privacy of data and other information.
    • Securing the network connection points.
  • This blueprint and associated tools are scalable for all types of organizations within various industry sectors.

Build a Cloud Security Strategy Research & Tools

Start Here – read the Executive Brief

Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should build a cloud security strategy, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Explore security considerations for the cloud

Explore how the cloud changes the required controls and implementation strategies for a variety of different security domains.

  • Build a Cloud Security Strategy – Phase 1: Explore Security Considerations for the Cloud
  • Cloud Security Information Security Gap Analysis Tool
  • Cloud Security Strategy Template

2. Prioritize initiatives and construct a roadmap

Develop your organizational approach to various domains of security in the cloud, considering the cloud’s unique risks and challenges.

  • Build a Cloud Security Strategy – Phase 2: Prioritize Initiatives and Construct a Roadmap
[infographic]

Workshop: Build a Cloud Security Strategy

Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

1 Define Your Approach

The Purpose

Define your unique approach to improving security in the cloud.

Key Benefits Achieved

An understanding of the organization’s requirements for cloud security.

Activities

1.1 Define your approach to cloud security.

1.2 Define your governance requirements.

1.3 Define your cloud security management requirements.

Outputs

Defined cloud security approach

Defined governance requirements

2 Respond to Cloud Security Challenges

The Purpose

Explore challenges posed by the cloud in various areas of security.

Key Benefits Achieved

An understanding of how the organization needs to evolve to combat the unique security challenges of the cloud.

Activities

2.1 Explore cloud asset management.

2.2 Explore cloud network security.

2.3 Explore cloud application security.

2.4 Explore log and event management.

2.5 Explore cloud incident response.

2.6 Explore cloud eDiscovery and forensics.

2.7 Explore cloud backup and recovery.

Outputs

Understanding of cloud security strategy components (cont.).

3 Build Cloud Security Roadmap

The Purpose

Identify initiatives to mitigate challenges posed by the cloud in various areas of security.

Key Benefits Achieved

A roadmap for improving security in the cloud.

Activities

3.1 Define tasks and initiatives.

3.2 Finalize your task list

3.3 Consolidate gap closure actions into initiatives.

3.4 Finalize initiative list.

3.5 Conduct a cost-benefit analysis.

3.6 Prioritize initiatives and construct a roadmap.

3.7 Create effort map.

3.8 Assign initiative execution waves.

3.9 Finalize prioritization.

3.10 Incorporate initiatives into a roadmap.

3.11 Schedule initiatives.

3.12 Review your results.

Outputs

Defined task list.

Cost-benefit analysis

Roadmap

Effort map

Initiative schedule

Select and Implement an IT PPM Solution

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}440|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
  • member rating average dollars saved: $125,999 Average $ Saved
  • member rating average days saved: 29 Average Days Saved
  • Parent Category Name: Portfolio Management
  • Parent Category Link: /portfolio-management
  • The number of IT project resources and the quantity of IT projects and tasks can no longer be recorded, prioritized, and tracked using non-commercial project portfolio management (PPM) solutions.
  • Your organization has attained a moderate level of PPM maturity.
  • You have sufficient financial and technical resources to purchase a commercial PPM solution.
  • There is a wide variety of commercial PPM solutions; different kinds of PPM solutions are more appropriate for organizations of a certain size and a certain PPM maturity level than others.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • Implementations of PPM solutions are often unsuccessful resulting in wasted time and resources; failing to achieve sustainable adoption of the tool is a widespread pain point.
  • The costs of PPM solutions do not end after the implementation and subscription invoices are paid. Have realistic expectations about the time required to use and maintain PPM solutions to ensure success.
  • PPM solutions help PMOs serve the organization’s core decision makers. Success depends on improved service to these stakeholders.

Impact and Result

  • Using Info-Tech’s Vendor Landscape and PPM solution use cases, you will be able to make sense of the diversity of PPM solutions available in today’s market and choose the most appropriate solution for your organization’s size and level of PPM maturity.
  • Info-Tech’s blueprint for a PPM solution selection and implementation project will provide you with a variety of tools and templates.
  • A carefully planned out and executed selection and implementation process will help ensure your organization can maximize the value of your project portfolio and will allow the PMO to improve portfolio stakeholder satisfaction.

Select and Implement an IT PPM Solution Research & Tools

Start here – read the Executive Brief

Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should implement a commercial PPM solution, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Launch the PPM solution project and collect requirements

Create a PPM solution selection and implementation project charter and gather your organizations business and technical requirements.

  • Select and Implement a PPM Solution – Phase 1: Launch the PPM Solution Project and Collect Requirements
  • PPM Solution Project Charter Template
  • PPM Implementation Work Breakdown Structure
  • PPM Solution Requirements Gathering Tool
  • PPM Solution Cost-of-Use Estimation Tool
  • PPM Solution RFP Template
  • PPM Solution Success Metrics Workbook
  • PPM Solution Use-Case Fit Assessment Tool

2. Select a PPM solution

Select the most appropriate PPM solution for your organization by using Info-Tech’s PPM solution Vendor Landscape and use cases to help you create a vendor shortlist, produce an RFP, and establish evaluation criteria for ranking your shortlisted solutions.

  • Select and Implement a PPM Solution – Phase 2: Select a PPM Solution
  • PPM Vendor Shortlist & Detailed Feature Analysis Tool
  • PPM Solution Vendor Response Template
  • PPM Solution Evaluation & RFP Scoring Tool
  • PPM Solution Vendor Demo Script

3. Plan the PPM solution implementation

Plan a PPM solution implementation that will result in long-term sustainable adoption of the tool and that will allow the PMO to meet the needs of core project portfolio stakeholders.

  • Select and Implement a PPM Solution – Phase 3: Plan the PPM Solution Implementation
[infographic]

Workshop: Select and Implement an IT PPM Solution

Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

1 Launch the PPM Solution Project and Gather Requirements

The Purpose

Create a PPM solution selection and implementation project charter.

Gather the business and technical requirements for the PPM solution.

Establish clear and measurable success criteria for your PPM solution project.

Key Benefits Achieved

Comprehensive project plan

Comprehensive and organized record of the various PPM solution requirements

A record of PPM solution project goals and criteria that can be used in the future to establish the success of the project

Activities

1.1 Brainstorm, refine, and prioritize your PPM solution needs

1.2 Stakeholder identification exercise

1.3 Project charter work session

1.4 Requirements gathering work session

1.5 PPM solution success metrics workbook session

Outputs

High-level outline of PPM solution requirements

Stakeholder consultation plan

A draft project charter and action plan to fill in project charter gaps

A draft requirements workbook and action plan to fill in requirement gathering gaps

A PPM project success metrics workbook that can be used during and after the project

2 Select a PPM Solution

The Purpose

Identify the PPM solutions that are most appropriate for your organization’s size and level of PPM maturity.

Create a PPM solution and vendor shortlist.

Create a request for proposal (RFP).

Create a PPM solution scoring and evaluation tool.

Key Benefits Achieved

Knowledge of the PPM solution market and the various features available

An informed shortlist of PPM vendors

An organized and focused method for evaluating the often long and complex responses to the RFP that vendors provide

The groundwork for an informed and defensible selection of a PPM solution for your organization

Activities

2.1 Assess the size of your organization and the level of PPM maturity to select the most appropriate use case

2.2 PPM solution requirements and criteria ranking activity

2.3 An RFP working session

2.4 Build an RFP evaluation tool

Outputs

Identification of the most appropriate use case in Info-Tech’s Vendor Landscape

A refined and organized list of the core features that will be included in the RFP

A draft RFP with an action plan to fill in any RFP gaps

An Excel tool that can be used to compare and evaluate vendors’ responses to the RFP

3 Prepare for the PPM Solution Implementation

The Purpose

To think ahead to the eventual implementation of the solution that will occur once the selection phase is completed

Key Benefits Achieved

An understanding of key insights and steps that will help avoid mistakes resulting in poor adoption or PPM solutions that end up producing little tangible value

Activities

3.1 Outline high-level implementation stages

3.2 Organizational change management strategy session

3.3 A PPM project success metrics planning session

Outputs

High-level implementation tasks and milestones

A RACI chart for core implementation tasks

A high-level PPM solution implementation organizational change management strategy

A RACI chart for core organizational change management tasks related to the PPM solution implementation

A PPM project success metrics schedule and plan

Reimagine Learning in the Face of Crisis

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}601|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: N/A
  • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
  • member rating average days saved: N/A
  • Parent Category Name: Train & Develop
  • Parent Category Link: /train-and-develop
  • As organizations re-evaluate their priorities and shift to new ways of working, leaders and employees are challenged to navigate unchartered territory and to adjust quickly to ever-evolving priorities.
  • Learning how to perform effectively through the crisis and deliver on new priorities is crucial to the success of all employees and the organization.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

The most successful organizations recognize that learning is critical to adjusting quickly and effectively to their new reality. This requires L&D to reimagine their approach to deliver learning that enables the organization’s immediate and evolving priorities.

Impact and Result

  • L&D teams should focus on how to support employees and managers to develop the critical competencies they need to successfully perform through the crisis, enabling organizations to survive and thrive during and beyond the crisis.
  • Ensure learning needs align closely with evolving organizational priorities, collaborate cross-functionally, and curate content to provide the learning employees and leaders need most, when they need it.

Reimagine Learning in the Face of Crisis Research & Tools

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Prioritize

Involve key stakeholders, identify immediate priorities, and conduct high-level triage of L&D.

  • Reimagine Learning in the Face of Crisis Storyboard
  • Reimagine Learning in the Face of Crisis Workbook

2. Reimagine

Determine learning needs and ability to realistically deliver learning. Leverage existing or curate learning content that can support learning needs.

3. Transform

Identify technical requirements for the chosen delivery method and draft a four- to six-week action plan.

  • How to Curate Guide
  • Tips for Building an Online Learning Community
  • Ten Tips for Adapting In-Person Training During a Crisis
  • Tips for Remote Learning in the Face of Crisis
[infographic]

Enter Into Mobile Development Without Confusion and Frustration

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}282|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: N/A
  • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
  • member rating average days saved: N/A
  • Parent Category Name: Mobile Development
  • Parent Category Link: /mobile-development
  • IT managers don’t know where to start when initiating a mobile program.
  • IT has tried mobile development in the past but didn't achieve success.
  • IT must initiate a mobile program quickly based on business priorities and needs a roadmap based on best practices.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • Form factors and mobile devices won't drive success – business alignment and user experience will. Don't get caught up with the latest features in mobile devices.
  • Software emulation testing is not true testing. Get on the device and run your tests.
  • Cross form-factor testing cannot be optimized to run in parallel. Therefore, anticipate longer testing cycles for cross form-factor testing.

Impact and Result

  • Prepare your development, testing, and deployment teams for mobile development.
  • Get a realistic assessment of ROI for the launch of a mobile program.

Enter Into Mobile Development Without Confusion and Frustration Research & Tools

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Make the Case for a Mobile Program

Understand the current mobile ecosystem. Use this toolkit to help you initiate a mobile development program.

  • Storyboard: Enter Into Mobile Development Without Confusion and Frustration

2. Assess Your Dev Process for Readiness

Review and evaluate your current application development process.

3. Prepare to Execute Your Mobile Program

Prioritize your mobile program based on your organization’s prioritization profile.

  • Mobile Program Tool

4. Communicate with Stakeholders

Summarize the execution of the mobile program.

  • Project Status Communication Worksheet
[infographic]

Workshop: Enter Into Mobile Development Without Confusion and Frustration

Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

1 Build your Future Mobile Development State

The Purpose

Understand the alignment of stakeholder objectives and priorities to mobile dev IT drivers.

Assess readiness of your organization for mobile dev.

Understand how to build your ideal mobile dev process.

Key Benefits Achieved

Identify and address the gaps in your existing app dev process.

Build your future mobile dev state.

Activities

1.1 Getting started

1.2 Assess your current state

1.3 Establish your future state

Outputs

List of key stakeholders

Stakeholder and IT driver mapping and assessment of current app dev process

List of practices to accommodate mobile dev

2 Prepare and Execute your Mobile Program

The Purpose

Assess the impact of mobile dev on your existing app dev process.

Prioritize your mobile program.

Understand the dev practice metrics to gauge success.

Key Benefits Achieved

Properly prepare for the execution of your mobile program.

Calculate the ROI of your mobile program.

Prioritize your mobile program with dependencies in mind.

Build a communication plan with stakeholders.

Activities

2.1 Conduct an impact analysis

2.2 Prepare to execute

2.3 Communicate with stakeholders

Outputs

Impact analysis of your mobile program and expected ROI

Mobile program order of execution and project dependencies mapping

List of dev practice metrics

Make Your IT Governance Adaptable

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}359|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: 8.0/10 Overall Impact
  • member rating average dollars saved: $123,499 Average $ Saved
  • member rating average days saved: 10 Average Days Saved
  • Parent Category Name: IT Governance, Risk & Compliance
  • Parent Category Link: /it-governance-risk-and-compliance
  • People don’t understand the value of governance, seeing it as a hindrance to productivity and efficiency.
  • Governance is delegated to people and practices that don’t have the ability or authority to make these decisions.
  • Decisions are made within committees that don’t meet frequently enough to support business velocity.
  • It is difficult to allocate time and resources to build or execute governance effectively.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • IT governance applies not just to the IT department but to all uses of information and technology.
  • IT governance works against you if it no longer aligns with or supports your organizational direction, goals, and work practices.
  • Governance doesn’t have to be bureaucratic or control based.
  • Your governance model should be able to adapt to changes in the organization’s strategy and goals, your industry, and your ways of working.
  • Governance can be embedded and automated into your practices.

Impact and Result

  • You will produce more value from IT by developing a governance framework optimized for your current needs and context, with the ability to adapt as your needs shift.
  • You will create the foundation and ability to delegate and empower governance to enable agile delivery.
  • You will identify areas where governance does not require manual oversight and can be embedded into the way you work.

Make Your IT Governance Adaptable Research & Tools

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Make Your IT Governance Adaptable Deck – A document that walks you through how to design and implement governance that fits the context of your organization and can adapt to change.

Our dynamic, flexible, and embedded approach to governance will help drive organizational success. The three-phase methodology will help you identify your governance needs, select and refine your governance model, and embed and automate governance decisions.

  • Make Your IT Governance Adaptable – Phases 1-3

2. Adaptive and Controlled Governance Model Templates and Workbook – Documents that gather context information about your organization to identify the best approach for governance.

Use these templates and workbook to identify the criteria and design factors for your organization and the design triggers to maintain fit. Upon completion this will be your new governance framework model.

  • Controlled Governance Models Template
  • IT Governance Program Overview
  • Governance Workbook

3. Implementation Plan and Workbook – Tools that help you build and finalize your approach to implement your new or revised governance model.

Upon completion you will have a finalized implementation plan and a visual roadmap.

  • Governance Implementation Plan
  • Governance Roadmap Workbook

4. Governance Committee Charter Templates – Base charters that can be adapted for communication.

Customize these templates to create the committee charters or terms of reference for the committees developed in your governance model.

  • IT PMO Committee Charter
  • IT Risk Committee Charter for Controlled Governance
  • IT Steering Committee Charter for Controlled Governance
  • Program Governance Committee Charter
  • Architecture Review Board Charter
  • Data Governance Committee Charter
  • Digital Governance Committee Charter

5. Governance Automation Criteria Checklist and Worksheet – Tools that help you determine which governance decisions can be automated and work through the required logic and rules.

The checklist is a starting point for confirming which activities and decisions should be considered for automation or embedding. Use the worksheet to develop decision logic by defining the steps and information inputs involved in making decisions.

  • Governance Automation Criteria Checklist
  • Governance Automation Worksheet

Infographic

Workshop: Make Your IT Governance Adaptable

Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

1 Develop Your Guiding Star

The Purpose

Establish the context for your governance model.

Key Benefits Achieved

Core understanding of the context that will enable us to build an optimal model

Activities

1.1 Confirm mission, vision, and goals.

1.2 Define scope and principles.

1.3 Adjust for culture and finalize context.

Outputs

Governance principles

Governance context and goals

2 Define the Governance Model

The Purpose

To select and adapt a governance model based on your context.

Key Benefits Achieved

A selected and optimized governance model

Activities

2.1 Select and refine governance model.

2.2 Confirm and adjust the structure.

2.3 Review and adapt governance responsibilities and activities.

2.4 Validate governance mandates and membership.

Outputs

IT governance model and adjustment triggers

IT governance structure, responsibilities, membership, and cadence

Governance committee charters

3 Build Governance Process and Policy

The Purpose

Refine your governance practices and associate policies properly.

Key Benefits Achieved

A completed governance model that can be implemented with clear update triggers and review timing

Policy alignment with the right levels of authority

Activities

3.1 Update your governance process.

3.2 Align policies to mandate.

3.3 Adjust and confirm your model.

3.4 Identify and document update triggers and embed into review cycle.

Outputs

IT governance process and information flow

IT governance policies

Finalized governance model

4 Embed and Automate Governance

The Purpose

Identify options to automate and embed governance activities and decisions.

Key Benefits Achieved

Simply more consistent governance activities and automate them to enhance speed and support governance delegation and empowerment

Activities

4.1 Identify decisions and standards that can be automated. Develop decision logic.

4.2 Plan verification and validation approach.

4.3 Build implementation plan.

4.4 Develop communication strategy and messaging.

Outputs

Selected automation options, decision logic, and business rules

Implementation and communication plan

Further reading

Make Your IT Governance Adaptable

Governance isn't optional, so keep it simple and make it flexible.

Table of Contents

4 Analyst Perspective

5 Executive Summary

13 Governance Stages

14 Info-Tech’s IT Governance Thought Model

19 Info-Tech’s Approach

23 Insight Summary

30 Phase 1: Identify Your Governance Needs

54 Phase 2: Select and Refine Your Governance Model

76 Phase 3: Embed and Automate

94 Summary of Accomplishment

95 Additional Support

97 Contributors

98 Bibliography

Make Your IT Governance Adaptable

Governance isn't optional, so keep it simple and make it flexible.

EXECUTIVE BRIEF

Analyst Perspective

Governance will always be part of the fabric of your organization. Make it adaptable so it doesn’t constrain your success.

Photo of Valence Howden, Principal Research Director, Info-Tech Research Group

Far too often, the purpose of information and technology (I&T) governance is misunderstood. Instead of being seen as a way to align the organization’s vision to its investment in information and technology, it has become so synonymous with compliance and control that even mentioning the word “governance” elicits a negative reaction.

Success in modern digital organizations depends on their ability to adjust for velocity and uncertainty, requiring a dynamic and responsive approach to governance – one that is embedded and automated in your organization to enable new ways of working, innovation, and change.

Evolutionary theory describes adaptability as the way an organism adjusts to fit a new environment, or changes to its existing environment, to survive. Applied to organizations, adaptable governance is critical to the ability to survive and succeed.

If your governance doesn’t adjust to enable your changing business environment and customer needs, it will quickly become misaligned with your goals and drive you to failure.

It is critical that people build an approach to governance that is effective and relevant today while building in adaptability to keep it relevant tomorrow.

Valence Howden
Principal Research Director, Info-Tech Research Group

Executive Summary

Your Challenge

  • People don’t understand the value of governance, seeing it as a hindrance to productivity and efficiency.
  • Governance is delegated to people and practices that don’t have the ability or authority to make decisions.
  • Decisions are made within committees that don’t meet frequently enough to support business velocity.
  • It is difficult to allocate time and resources to build or execute governance effectively

Common Obstacles

  • You are unable to clearly communicate how governance adds value to your organization.
  • Your IT governance approach no longer aligns with or supports your organizational direction, goals, and work practices.
  • Governance is seen and performed as a bureaucratic control-based exercise.
  • Governance activities are not transparent.
  • The governance committee gets too deeply involved with project deep dives and daily management, derailing its effectiveness and ability to produce value.

Info-Tech’s Approach

  • Use Info-Tech’s IT governance models to identify a base model similar to the way you are organized. Confirm your current and future placement in governance execution.
  • Adjust the model based on industry needs, your principles, regulatory requirements, and your future direction.
  • Identify where to embed or automate decision making and compliance and what is required to do so effectively.
  • Implement your governance model for success.

Info-Tech Insight

IT governance must be embedded and automated, where possible, to effectively meet the needs and velocity of digital organizations and modern practices and to drive success and value.

What is governance?

IT governance is a critical and embedded practice that ensures that information and technology investments, risks, and resources are aligned in the best interests of the organization and produce business value.

Effective governance ensures that the right technology investments are made at the right time to support and enable your organization’s mission, vision, and goals.

5 KEY OUTCOMES OF GOOD GOVERNANCE

STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT

Technology investments and portfolios are aligned with the organization's strategic objectives.

RISK OPTIMIZATION

Organizational risks are understood and addressed to minimize impact and optimize opportunities.

VALUE DELIVERY

IT investments and initiatives deliver their expected benefits.

RESOURCE OPTIMIZATION

Resources (people, finances, time) are appropriately allocated across the organization to optimal organizational benefit.

PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT

The performance of technology investments is monitored and used to determine future courses of action and to confirm achievement of success.

‹–EVALUATE–DIRECT–MONITOR–›

Why is this necessary?

  • Governance is not simply a committee or an activity that you perform at a specific point in time; it is a critical and continuously active practice that drives the success of your organization. It is part of your organization’s DNA and is just as unique, with some attributes common to all (IT governance elements), some specific to your family (industry refinements), and some specific to you (individual organization).
  • Your approach to governance needs to change over time in order to remain relevant and continue to enable value and success, but organizations rarely want to change governance once it’s in place.
  • To meet the speed and flow of practices like Lean, DevOps, and Agile, your IT governance needs to be done differently and become embedded into the way your organization works. You must adjust your governance model based on key moments of change – organizational triggers – to maintain the effectiveness of your model.

Info-Tech Insight

Build an optimal model quickly and implement the core elements using an iterative approach to ensure the changes provide the most value.

The Technology Value Trinity

Delivery of Business Value & Strategic Needs

  • DIGITAL & TECHNOLOGY STRATEGY
    The identification of objectives and initiatives necessary to achieve business goals.
  • IT OPERATING MODEL
    The model for how IT is organized to deliver on business needs and strategies.
  • INFORMATION & TECHNOLOGY GOVERNANCE
    The governance to ensure the organization and its customers get maximum value from the use of information and technology.

All three elements of the Technology Value Trinity work in harmony to deliver business value and meet strategic needs. As one changes, the others need to change as well.

  • Digital and IT Strategy tells you what you need to achieve to be successful.
  • IT Operating Model and Organizational Design is the alignment of resources to deliver on your strategy and priorities.
  • Information & Technology Governance is the confirmation that IT’s goals and strategy align with the business’ strategy. It is the mechanism by which you continuously prioritize work to ensure that what you deliver is in line with the strategy. This oversight involves evaluating, directing, and monitoring the delivery of outcomes to ensure that the use of resources results in achieving the organization’s goals.

Too often strategy, operating model and organizational design, and governance are considered separate practices. As a result, “strategic documents” end up being wish lists, and projects continue to be prioritized based on who shouts the loudest rather than on what is in the best interest of the organization.

Where information & technology governance fits within an organization

An infographic illustrating where Governance fits within an organization. The main section is titled 'Enterprise Governance and Strategy' and contains 'Value Outcomes', 'Mission and Vision', 'Goals and Objectives', and 'Guiding Principles'. These all feed into the highlighted 'Information & Technology Governance', which then contributes to 'IT Strategy', which lies outside the main section.

I&T governance hasn’t achieved its purpose

Governance is the means by which IT ensures that information and technology delivery and spend is aligned to business goals and delivers business outcomes. However, most CEOs continue to perceive IT as being poorly aligned to the business’ strategic goals, which indicates that governance is not implemented or executed properly.

For I&T governance to be effective you need a clear understanding of the things that drive your organization and its success. This understanding becomes your guiding star, which is critical for effective governance. It also requires participation by all parts of the organization, not just IT.

Info-Tech CIO/CEO Alignment Diagnostics (N=124)

43% of CEOs believe that business goals are going unsupported by IT.

60% of CEOs believe that improvement is required around IT’s understanding of business goals.

80% of CIOs/CEOs are misaligned on the target role for IT.

30% of business stakeholders are supporters (N=32,536) of their IT departments

Common causes of poor governance

Key causes of poor or misaligned governance

  1. Governance and its value to your organization is not well understood, often being confused or integrated with more granular management activities.
  2. Business executives fail to understand that IT governance is a function of the business and not the IT department.
  3. Poor past experiences have made “governance” a bad word in the organization. People see it as a constraint and barrier that must be circumvented to get work done.
  4. There is misalignment between accountability and authority throughout the organization, and the wrong people are involved in governance practices.
  5. There is an unwillingness to change a governance approach that has served the organization well in the past, leading to challenges when the organization starts to change practices and speed of delivery.
  6. There is a lack of data and data-related capabilities required to support good decision making and the automation of governance decisions.
  7. The goals and strategy of the organization are not known or understood, leaving nothing for IT governance to orient around.

Key symptoms of ineffective governance committees

  1. No actions or decisions are generated. The committee produces no value and makes no decisions after it meets. The lack of value output makes the usefulness of the committee questionable.
  2. Resources are overallocated. There is a lack of clear understanding of capacity and value in work to be done, leading to consistent underestimation of required resources and poor resource allocation.
  3. Decisions are changed outside of committee. Decisions made or initiatives approved by the committee are later changed when the proper decision makers are involved or the right information becomes available.
  4. Governance decisions conflict with organizational direction. This shows an obvious lack of alignment and behavioral disconnect that work against organizational success. It is often due to not accounting for where power really exists within the structure.
  5. Consistently poor outcomes are produced from governance direction. Committee members’ lack of business acumen, relevant data, or understanding of organizational goals results in decisions that fail to drive successful measured outcomes.

Mature your governance by transitioning from ad hoc to automated

Organizations should look to progress in their governance stages. Ad hoc and controlled governance practices tend to be more rigid, making these a poor fit for organizations requiring higher velocity delivery or using more agile and adaptive practices.

The goal as you progress through these stages is to delegate governance and empower teams based on your fit and culture, enabling teams where needed to make optimal decisions in real time, ensuring that they are aligned with the best interests of the organization.

Automate governance for optimal velocity while mitigating risks and driving value.

This puts your organization in the best position to be adaptive, able to react effectively to volatility and uncertainty.

A graph illustrating the transition from Ad Hoc to Automated. The y-axis is 'Process Integration' and x-axis is 'Trust & Empowerment'. 'Ad Hoc: Inconsistent Decision Making' lies close to the origin, ranking low on both axes' values. 'Controlled: Authoritarian, Highly Structured' ranks slightly higher on both axes. 'Agile: Distributed & Empowered' ranks 2nd highest on both axes. 'Automated: High Velocity, Embedded & Flexible' ranks highest on both axes.

Stages of governance

Adaptive
Data-Centric


ˆ


ˆ


ˆ


ˆ


ˆ
Traditional
(People- and Document-Centric)

4

Automated Governance
  • Entrenched into organizational processes and product/service design
  • Empowered and fully delegated to maintain fit and drive organizational success and survival

3

Agile Governance
  • Flexible enough to support different needs in the organization and respond quickly to change
  • Driven by principles and delegated throughout the company

2

Controlled Governance
  • Focused on compliance and hierarchy-based authority
  • Levels of authority defined and often driven by regulatory requirements

1

Ad Hoc Governance
  • Not well defined or understood within the organization
  • Occurs out of necessity but often not done by the right people or bodies

Make Governance Adaptable and Automated to Drive Success and Value

Governance adaptiveness ensures the success of digital organizations and modern practice implementation.

THE PROBLEM

  • The wrong people are making decisions.
  • Organizations don't understand what governance is or why it's done.
  • Governance scope and design is a bad fit, damaging the organization.
  • People think governance is optional.

THE SOLUTION

ESTABLISH YOUR GUIDING PRINCIPLES

Define and establish the guiding principle that drive your organization toward success.

  • Mission & Vision
  • Business Goals & Success Criteria
  • Operating Model & Work Practices
  • Governance Scope
  • Principles
SELECT AND REFINE YOUR MODEL

Use Info-Tech's IT Governance Models to identify a base model similar to the way you are organized. Confirm your current and future placement in governance execution.

IDENTIFY MODEL UPDATE TRIGGERS

Adjust the model based on industry needs, your principles, regulatory requirements, and future direction.

  • Principles
    Select principles that allow the organization to be adaptive while still ensuring the governance continues to stay on course with pursuing its guiding star.
  • Responsibilities
    Decide on the governance responsibilities related to Oversight Level, Strategic Alignment, Value Delivery, Risk Optimization, Resource Optimization, and Performance Management.
  • Structure
    Determine at which structured level governance is appropriate: Enterprise, Strategic, Tactical, or Operational.
  • Processes
    Establish processes that will enable governance to occur such as: Embed the processes required for successful governance.
  • Membership
    Identify the Responsibility & Accountability of those who should be involved in governance processes, policies, guidelines, and responsibilities.
  • Policies
    Confirm any governing policies that need to be adhered to and considered to manage risk.
DETERMINE AUTOMATION OPTIONS AND DECISION RULES

Identify where to embed or automate decision making and compliance and what is required to do so effectively.

STAGES OF GOVERNANCE

    Traditional (People- and document-centric)
  1. AD HOC GOVERNANCE
    Governance that is not well defined or understood within the organization. It occurs out of necessity but often not by the right people or bodies.
  2. CONTROLLED GOVERNANCE
    Governance focused on compliance and hierarchy-based, authority-driven control of decisions. Levels of Authority are defined and often driven by regulatory requirements.
  3. Adaptive (Data Centric)
  4. AGILE GOVERNANCE
    Governance that is flexible to support different needs and quick responses in the organization. Driven by principles and delegated throughout the company.
  5. AUTOMATED GOVERNANCE
    Governance that is entrenched and automated into the organizational processes and product/service design. Empowered and fully delegated governance to maintain fit and drive organizational success and survival.

KEY INSIGHT

Governance must actively adapt to changes in your organization, environment, and practices or it will drive you to failure.

Developing governance principles

Governance principles support the move from controlled to automated governance by providing guardrails that guide your decisions. They provide the ethical boundaries and cultural perspectives that contextualize your decisions and keep you in line with organizational values. Determining principles are global in nature.

CONTROLLED CHANGE ACTIONS AND RATIONALE AUTOMATED
Disentangle governance and management Move from governance focused on evaluating, directing, and monitoring strategic decisions around information and technology toward defining and automating rules and principles for decision making into processes and practices, empowering the organization and driving adaptiveness. Delegate and empower
Govern toward value Move from identifying the organization’s mission, goals, and key drivers toward orienting IT to align with those value outcomes and embedding value outcomes into design and delivery practices. Deliver to defined outcomes
Make risk-informed decisions Move from governance bodies using risk information to manually make informed decisions based on their defined risk tolerance toward having risk information and attestation baked into decision making across all aspects and layers of the IT organization – from design to sustainment. Embed risk decision making into processes and practices
Measure to drive improvement Move from static lagging metrics that validate that the work being done is meeting the organization’s needs and guide future decision making toward automated governance with more transparency driven by data-based decision making and real-time data insights. Trust through real-time reporting
Enforce standards and behavior Move from enforcing standards and behavior and managing exceptions to ensure that there are consistent outcomes and quality toward automating standards and behavioral policies and embedding adherence and changes in behavior into the organization’s natural way of working. Automate standards through automated decision rules, verification, and validation

Find your guiding star

MISSION AND VISION –› GOALS AND OBJECTIVES –› GUIDING PRINCIPLES –›

VALUE

Why your organization exists and what value it aims to provide. The purpose you build a strategy to achieve. What your organization needs be successful at to fulfill its mission. Key propositions and guardrails that define and guide expected organizational behavior and beliefs.

Your mission and vision define your goals and objectives. These are reinforced by your guiding principles, including ethical considerations, your culture, and expected behaviors. They provide the boundaries and guardrails for enabling adaptive governance, ensuring you continue to move in the right direction for organizational success.

To paraphrase Lewis Carroll, “If you don't know where you want to get to, it doesn't much matter which way you go.” Once you know what matters, where value resides, and which considerations are necessary to make decisions, you have consistent directional alignment that allows you to delegate empowered governance throughout the organization, taking you to the places you want to go.

Understand governance versus management

Don’t blur the lines between governance and management; each has a unique role to play. Confusing them results in wasted time and confusion around ownership.

Governance

I&T governance defines WHAT should be done and sets direction through prioritization and decision making, monitoring overall IT performance.

Governance aligns with the mission and vision of the organization to guide IT.

A cycle of processes split into two halves, 'Governance Processes' and 'Management Processes'. Beginning on the Management side, the processes are 'Plan', 'Build', 'Run', 'Monitor', then to the Governance side, 'Evaluate', 'Direct', 'Monitor', and back to the beginning.

Management

Management focuses on HOW to do things to achieve the WHAT. It is responsible for executing on, operating, and monitoring activities as determined by I&T governance.

Management makes decisions for implementation based on governance direction.

Data is critical to automating governance

Documents and subjective/non-transparent decisions do not create sufficient structure to allow for the true automation of governance. Data related to decisions and aggregated risk allow you to define decision logic and rules and algorithmically embed them into your organization.

People- and Document-Centric

Governance drives activities through specific actors (individuals/committees) and unstructured data in processes and documents that are manually executed, assessed, and revised. There are often constraints caused by gaps or lack of adequate and integrated information in support of good decisions.

Data-Centric

Governance actors provide principles, parameters, and decision logic that enable the creation of code, rulesets, and algorithms that leverage organizational data. Attestation is automatic – validated and managed within the process, product, or service.

Info-Tech’s Approach

Define your context and build your model

ESTABLISH YOUR GUIDING PRINCIPLES

Define and establish the guiding principle that drive your organization toward success.

  • Mission & Vision
  • Business Goals & Success Criteria
  • Operating Model & Work Practices
  • Governance Scope
  • Principles
SELECT AND REFINE YOUR MODEL

Use Info-Tech's IT Governance Models to identify a base model similar to the way you are organized. Confirm your current and future placement in governance execution.

MODEL UPDATE TRIGGERS

Adjust the model based on industry needs, your principles, regulatory requirements, and future direction.

  • Principles
    Select principles that allow the organization to be adaptive while still ensuring the governance continues to stay on course with pursuing its guiding star.
  • Responsibilities
    Decide on the governance responsibilities related to Oversight Level, Strategic Alignment, Value Delivery, Risk Optimization, Resource Optimization, and Performance Management.
  • Structure
    Determine at which structured level governance is appropriate: Enterprise, Strategic, Tactical, or Operational.
  • Processes
    Establish processes that will enable governance to occur such as: Embed the processes required for successful governance.
  • Membership
    Identify the Responsibility & Accountability of those who should be involved in governance processes, policies, guidelines, and responsibilities.
  • Policies
    Confirm any governing policies that need to be adhered to and considered to manage risk.
AUTOMATION OPTIONS AND DECISION RULES

Identify where to embed or automate decision making and compliance and what is required to do so effectively.

The Info-Tech Difference

Define your context and build your model

  1. Quickly identify the organizational needs driving governance and your guiding star.
  2. Select and refine a base governance model based on our templates.
  3. Define and document the key changes in your organization that will trigger a need to update or revise your governance.
  4. Determine where you might be able to automate aspects of your governance.
  5. Design your decision rules where appropriate to support automated and adaptive governance.

How to use this research

Where are you in your governance optimization journey?

MY GOVERNANCE IS AD HOC AND WE’RE STARTING FROM SCRATCH I NEED TO BUILD A NEW GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE OUR GOVERNANCE APPROACH IS INEFFECTIVE AND NEEDS IMPROVEMENT I NEED TO LOOK AT OPTIONS FOR AUTOMATING GOVERNANCE PRACTICES
Step 1.1: Define Your Governance Context Step 1.2: Structure Your IT Governance Phase 2: Select and Refine Your Model Phase 3: Embed and Automate

IT governance is about ensuring that the investment decisions made around information and technology drive the optimal organizational value, not about governing the IT department.

In this section we will clarify your organizational context for governance and define your guiding star to orient your governance design and inform your structure.

There is no need to start from scratch! Start with Info-Tech’s best-practice IT governance models and customize them based on your organizational context.

The research in this section will help you to select the right base model to work from and provide guidance on how to refine it.

Governance practices eventually stop being a good fit for a changing organization, and things that worked before become bottlenecks.

Governing roles and committees don’t adjust well, don’t have consistent practices, and lack the right information to make good decisions.

The research in this section will help you improve and realign your governance practices.

Once your governance is controlled and optimized you are ready to investigate opportunities to automate.

This phase of the blueprint will help you determine where it’s feasible to automate and embed governance, understand key governance automation practices, and develop governing business rules to move your journey forward.

Related Research:

If you are looking for details on specific associated practices, please see our related research:

  1. I need to establish data governance.
  2. I need to manage my project portfolio, from intake to confirmation of value.
  3. I need better risk information to support decision making.
  4. I need to ensure I am getting the expected outcomes and benefits from IT spend.
  5. I need to prioritize my product backlog or service portfolio.

Info-Tech’s methodology for building and embedding adaptive governance

1. Identify Your Governance Needs 2. Select and Refine Your Governance Model 3. Embed and Automate
Phase Steps
  1. Confirm Mission, Vision, and Goals
  2. Define Scope and Principles
  3. Adjust for Culture and Finalize Context
  1. Select and Refine Your Governance Model
  2. Identify and Document Your Governance Triggers
  3. Build Your Implementation Plan
  1. Identify Decisions to Embed and Automate
  2. Plan Validation and Verification
  3. Update Implementation Plan
Phase Outcomes
  • Governance context, guiding star, and principles
  • Completed governance model with associated decisions and policies
  • Implementation plan
  • List of automation options
  • Decision logic, rules, and rulesets
  • Validation and verification approach
  • Finalized implementation plan

Insight summary

Value

To remain valuable, I&T governance must actively adapt to changes in your organization, environment, and practices, or it will drive you to failure instead of success.

Focus

I&T governance does not focus on the IT department. Rather, its intent is to ensure your organization makes sound decisions around investment in and use of information and technology.

Maturity

Your governance approach progresses in stages from ad hoc to automated as your organization matures. Your stage depends on your organizational needs and ways of working.

Good governance

Good governance does not equate to control and does not stifle innovation.

Automation

Automating governance must be done in stages, based on your capabilities, level of maturity, and amount of usable data.

Strategy

Establish the least amount of governance required to allow you to achieve your goals.

Guiding star

If you don’t establish a guiding star to align the different stakeholders in your organization, governance practices will create conflict and confusion.

Blueprint deliverables

Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

Key Deliverable:
Governance Framework Model

The governance framework model provides the design of your new governance model and the organizational context to retain stakeholder alignment and organizational satisfaction with governance.

The model includes the structures, practices, and responsibilities to drive effective governance in your organization.

Sample of the key blueprint deliverable 'Governance Framework Model'.

Governance Implementation Plan

This roadmap lays out the changes required to implement the governance model, the cultural items that need to be addressed, and anticipated timing.

Sample of the blueprint deliverable 'Governance Implementation Plan'.

Governance Committee Charters

Develop a detail governance charter or term of reference for each governing body. Outline the mandate, responsibilities, membership, process, and associated policies for each.

Sample of the blueprint deliverable 'Governance Committee Charters'.

Blueprint benefits

IT Benefits

  • Stronger, traceable alignment of IT decisions and initiatives to business needs.
  • Improved ability for IT to meet the changing demands and velocity of the business.
  • Better support and enablement of innovation – removing constraints and barriers.
  • Optimized governance that supports and enables modern work practices.
  • Increased value generation from IT initiatives and optimal use of IT resources.
  • Designed adaptability to ensure you remain in alignment as your business and IT environments change.

Business Benefits

  • Clear transparent focus of IT initiatives on generating strategic business value.
  • Improved ability to measure the value and contribution of IT to business goals.
  • Alignment and integration of business/IT strategy.
  • Optimized development and use of IT capabilities to meet business needs.
  • Improved integration with corporate/enterprise governance.

Executive Brief Case Study

INDUSTRY Manufacturing
SOURCE Info-Tech analyst experience

Improving the governance approach and delegating decision making to support a change in business operation

Challenge

The large, multi-national organization has locations across the world but has two primary headquarters, in Europe and the United States.

Market shifts drove an organizational shift in strategy, leading to a change in operating models, a product focus, and new work approaches across the organization.

Much of the implementation and execution was done in isolation, and effectiveness was slowed by poor integration and conflicting activities that worked against each other.

The product owner role was not well defined.

Solution

After reviewing the organization’s challenges and governance approach, we redefined and realigned its organizational and regional goals and identified outcomes that needed to be driven into their strategies.

We also reviewed their span of control and integration requirements and properly defined decisions that could be made regionally versus globally, so that decisions could be made to support new work practices.

We defined the product and service owner roles and the decisions each needed to make.

Results

We saw an improvement in the alignment of organizational activities and the right people and bodies making decisions.

Work and practices were aimed at the same key outcomes and alignment between teams toward organizational goal improved.

Within one year, the success rate of the organization’s initiatives increased by 22%, and the percentage of product-related decisions made by product owners increased by 50%.

Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

DIY Toolkit

Guided Implementation

Workshop

Consulting

"Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

Guided Implementation

A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

A typical GI is between 5 and 8 calls over the course of 2 to 3 months.

What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Phase 1: Identify Your Governance Needs

  • Call #1: Confirm your organization’s mission and vision and review your strategy and goals.
  • Call #2: Identify considerations and governance needs. Develop your guiding star and governing principles.
  • Phase 2: Select and Refine Your Model

  • Call #3: Select your base model and optimize it to meet your governance needs.
  • Call #4: Define your adjustment triggers and develop your implementation plan.
  • Phase 3: Embed and Automate

  • Call #5: Identify decisions and standards you can automate and where to embed them.
  • Call #6: Confirm levels of authority and data requirements. Establish your approach and update the implementation plan.

Workshop Overview

Contact your account representative for more information.
workshops@infotech.com1-888-670-8889

Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4 Session 5
Activities
Develop Your Guiding Star

1.1 Confirm mission, vision, and goals

1.2 Define scope and principles

1.3 Adjust for culture and finalize context

Define the Governance Model

2.1 Select and refine governance model

2.2 Confirm and adjust the structure

2.3 Review and adapt governance responsibilities and activities

2.4 Validate governance mandates and membership

Build Governance Process and Policy

3.1 Update your governance process

3.2 Align policies to mandate

3.3 Adjust and confirm your governance model

3.4 Identify and document your update triggers

3.5 Embed triggers into review cycle

Embed and Automate Governance

4.1 Identify decisions and standards to automate

4.2 Plan verification and validation approach

4.3 Build implementation plan

4.4 Develop communication strategy and messaging

Next Steps and Wrap-Up

5.1 Complete in-progress outputs from previous four sessions

5.2 Set up review time for workshop outputs and to discuss next steps

Outcomes
  1. Governance context and goals
  2. Governance principles
  1. IT governance model and adjustment triggers
  2. IT governance structure, responsibilities, membership, and cadence
  3. Governance committee charters
  1. IT governance process and information flow
  2. IT governance policies
  3. Finalized governance model
  1. Selected automation options, decision logic, and business rules
  2. Implementation and communication plan
  1. Governance context and principles
  2. Finalized governance model and charters
  3. Finalized implementation plan

Make Your IT Governance Adaptable

Phase 1

Identify your Governance Needs

Phase 1

  • 1.1 Define Your Guiding Star
  • 1.2 Define Scope and Principles
  • 1.3 Adjust for Culture and Finalize Context

Phase 2

  • 2.1 Choose and Adapt Your Model
  • 2.2. Identify and Document Your Governance Triggers
  • 2.3 Build Your Implementation Approach

Phase 3

  • 3.1 Identify Decisions to Embed and Automate
  • 3.2 Plan Validation and Verification
  • 3.3 Update Implementation Plan

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

Identify the organization’s goals, mission, and vision that will guide governance.

Define the scope of your governance model and the principles that will guide how it works.

Account for organizational attitudes, behaviors, and culture related to governance and finalize your context.

This phase involves the following participants:

  • Senior IT leadership
  • Governance leads

Step 1.1

Define Your Guiding Star

Activities
  • 1.1.1 Document and interpret your strategy, mission, and vision
  • 1.1.2 Document and interpret the business and IT goals and outcomes
  • 1.1.3 Identify your operating model and work processes

This step will walk you through the following activities:

Review your business and IT strategy, mission, and vision to ensure understanding of organizational direction.

Identify the business and IT goals that governance needs to align.

Confirm your operating model and any work practices that need to be accounted for in your model.

This step involves the following participants:

  • Senior IT leadership
  • Governance leads

Outcomes of this step

Identified guiding star outcomes to align governance outcomes with

Defined operating model type and work style that impact governance design

Identify Your Governance Needs

Step 1.1 – Define your Guiding Star Step 1.2 – Define Scope and Principles Step 1.3 – Adjust for Culture and Finalize Context

Govern by intent

Find the balance for your designed governance approach

Organic governance occurs during the formation of an organization and shifts with challenges, but it is rarely transparent and understood. It changes your culture in uncontrolled ways. Intentional governance is triggered by changes in organizational needs, working approaches, goals, and structures. It is deliberate and changes your culture to enable success.
Stock photo of a weight scale.

Info-Tech Insight

Your approach to governance needs to be designed, even if your execution of governance is adaptable and delegated.

What is your guiding star?

Your guiding star is a combination of your organization’s mission, vision, and strategy and the goals that have been defined to meet them.

It provides you with a consistent focal point around which I&T-related activities and projects orbit, like planets around a star.

It generates the gravity that governance uses to keep things from straying too far away from the goal of achieving relevant value.

  1. Mission & Vision
  2. Business Goals & Success Criteria
  3. Operating Model & Work Practices
  4. Governance Scope
  5. Principles

1.1.1 Document and interpret your strategy, mission, and vision

30 minutes

Input: Business strategy, IT strategy, Mission and vision statements

Output: Updated Governance Workbook, Documented strategic outcomes and organizational aims that governance needs to achieve

Materials: Whiteboard/flip charts, Governance Workbook

Participants: IT senior leadership

  1. Gather your available business, digital, and IT strategy, mission, and vision information and document everything in your Governance Workbook. It’s ok if you don’t have all of it.
  2. Review and your mission and vision as a group. Discuss and document key points, including:
    • Which activities do you perform as an organization that embody your vision?
    • What key decisions and behaviors are required to ensure that your mission and vision are achievable?
    • What do you require from leadership to enable you to govern effectively?
    • What are the implications of the mission and vision on how the organization needs to work? What are the implications on decisions around opportunities and risks?

Download the Governance Workbook

1.1.2 Document and interpret the business and IT goals and outcomes

60 minutes

Input: Business strategy, Business and IT goals and related initiatives

Output: Required success outcomes for goals, Links between IT and business goals that governance needs to align

Materials: Whiteboard/flip charts

Participants: IT senior leadership

  1. Document the business and IT goals that have been created to achieve the mission and vision.
  2. Discuss if there are any gaps between the goals and the mission and vision. Ask yourself – if we accomplish these goals will we have successfully achieved the mission?
  3. For each goal, define what successful achievement of the goal looks like. Starting with one goal or objective, ask:
    • How would I know I am on the right path and how will I know I have gotten there?
    • How would I know if I am not on the right path and what does a bad result look like?
  4. Document your success criteria.
  5. Brainstorm some examples of decisions that support or constrain the achievement of your goals.
  6. Repeat this exercise for your remaining goals.
  7. As a group, map IT goals to business goals.

What is your operating model and why is it important?

An IT operating model is a visual representation of the way your IT organization needs to be designed and the capabilities it requires to deliver on the business mission, strategic objectives, and technological ambitions.

The model is critical in the optimization and alignment of the IT organization’s structure in order to deliver the capabilities required to achieve business goals. It is a key determinant of how governance needs to be designed and where it is implemented.

Little visualizations of different operating models: 'Centralized', 'Decentralized', and 'Hybrid'.

1.1.3 Identify your operating model and work practices

60 minutes

Input: Organizational structure, Operating model (if available)

Output: Confirmed operating approach, Defined work practices

Materials: Whiteboard/flip charts

Participants: IT senior leadership

  1. Identify the way your organization functions:
    • How do we currently operate? Are we centralized, decentralized or a hybrid? Are we focused on delivering products and services? Do we provide service ourselves or do we use vendors for delivery?
    • Can we achieve our mission, goals, and strategies, if we continue to operate this way? What would we have to change in how we operate to be successful in the future?
  2. Identify your governance needs. Do we need to be more structured or more flexible to support our future ways of working?
    • If you operate in a more traditional way, consider whether you are implementing or moving toward more modern practices (e.g. Agile, DevOps, enterprise service management). Do you need to make more frequent but lower-risk decisions?
    • Is your organization ready to delegate governance culturally and in terms of business understanding? Is there enough available information to support adaptive decisions and actions?
  3. Document your operating style, expected changes in work style, and cultural readiness. You will need to consider the implications on design.

Step 1.2

Define Scope and Principles

Activities
  • 1.2.1 Determine the proper scope for your governance
  • 1.2.2 Confirm your determining governing principles
  • 1.2.3 Develop your specific governing principles

This step will walk you through the following activities:

Identify what is included and excluded within the scope of your governance.

Develop the determining and specific principles that provide guardrails for governance activities and decisions.

This step involves the following participants:

  • Senior IT leadership
  • Governance leads

Outcomes of this step

Documented governance scope and principles to apply

Identify Your Governance Needs

Step 1.1 – Define your Guiding Star Step 1.2 – Define Scope and Principles Step 1.3 – Adjust for Culture and Finalize Context

Define the context for governance

Based on the goals and principles you defined and the operating model you selected, confirm where oversight will be necessary and at what level. Focus on the necessity to expedite and clear barriers to the achievement of goals and on the ownership of risks and compliance. Some key considerations:

  • Where in the organization will you need to decide on work that needs to be done?
  • What type of work will you need to do?
  • In what areas could there be conflicts in prioritization/resource allocation to address?
  • Who is accountable for risks to the organization and its objectives?
  • Where are your regional or business-unit-specific concerns that require focused local attention?
  • Are we using more agile, rapid delivery methods to produce work?

Understand your governance scope

Your governance scope helps you define the boundaries of what your governance model and practices will cover. This includes key characteristics of your organization that impact what governance needs to address.

Sample Considerations

  • Organizational Span
    • The geographical area the organization operates within. Regional laws and requirements will affect governance delegation and standards/policy development.
  • Level of Regulation
    • Higher levels of regulation create more standards and controls for risk and compliance, impacting how authority can be delegated or automated.
  • Sourcing Model
    • Changing technology sourcing introduces additional vendor governance requirements and may impact compliance and audit.
  • Risk Posture
    • The appetite for risk organizationally, and in pockets, impacts the level of uncertainty you are willing to work within and impact decision-making authority positioning.
  • Size
    • The size of your organization impacts the approach to governance, practice implementation, and delegation of authority.
  • What Is Working Today?
    • Which elements of your current governance approach should be retained, and what are the biggest pain points that need to be addressed?
(Source: COBIT 2019)

1.2.1 Determine the proper scope for your governance

60 minutes

Input: Context information from Activity 1.1, Scoping areas

Output: Defined scope and span of control

Materials: Whiteboard/flip charts

Participants: IT senior leadership

  1. Determine the scope/span of control required for your governance by:
    • Reviewing your key IT capabilities. Identify the ones where the responsibilities and decisions require oversight to ensure they meet the needs of the organization.
    • Identify what works well or poorly in your current governance approach.
    • Discuss and document the level and type of knowledge and business understanding required.
    • Identify and document any regulations, standards, or laws that apply to your organization/industry and how broadly they have to be applied.
    • Identify the organization’s risk appetite, where known, and areas where acceptable thresholds of risk have been defined. Where are key risk and opportunity decisions made? Who owns risk in your organization?
    • Identify and document the perceived role of the IT group in your organization (e.g. support, innovator, partner) and sourcing model (e.g. insource, outsource).
    • Is there sufficient information and data available in your organization to support effective decision making?

How should your governance be structured?

Organizations often have too many governance bodies, creating friction without value. Where that isn’t the case, the bodies are often inefficient, with gaps or overlaps in accountability and authority. Structure your governance to optimize its effectiveness, designing with the intent to have the fewest number of governing bodies to be effective, but no less than is necessary.

Start with your operating model.

  • Understand what’s different about your governance based on whether your organization in centralized, distributed, or a different model (e.g. hybrid, product).
  • Identify and include governance structures that are mandatory due to regulation or industry.
  • Based on your context, identify how many of your governance activities should be performed together.

Determine whether your governance should be controlled or adaptive.

  • Do you have the capability to distribute governance and is your organization empowered enough culturally?
  • Do you have sufficient standards and data to leverage? Do you have the tools and capabilities?
  • Identify governance structures that are required due to regulation or industry.

Info-Tech Insight

Your approach to governance needs to be designed and structured, even if your execution of governance is adaptable and delegated.

Identify and Refine your Principles

Confirm your defining principles based on your selection of controlled or adaptive governance. Create specific principles to clarify boundaries or provide specific guidance for teams within the organization.

Controlled Adaptive
Disentangle governance and management Delegate and empower
Govern toward value Deliver to defined outcomes
Make risk-informed decisions Embed risk into decision making
Measure to drive improvement Trust though real-time reporting
Enforce standards and behavior Automate decision making though established standards

Determining Principle: Delegate and empower.

Specific Principle: Decisions should be made at the lowest reasonable level of the organization with clarity.

Rationale: To govern effectively with the velocity required to address business needs, governance needs to be executed deeper into the organization and organizational goals need to be clearly understood everywhere.

Implication: Decision making needs to be delegated throughout the organization, so information and data requirements need to be identified, decision-making approach and principles need to be shared, and authority needs to be delegated clearly.

1.2.2 Confirm your determining governance principles

30-45 minutes

Input: Governance Framework Model– Governance Principles

Output: Governance workbook - Finalized list of determining principles

Materials: Whiteboard/flip charts, Governance Workbook

Participants: IT senior leadership

  1. Review the IT governance principles in your Governance Workbook.
  2. Within your IT senior leadership team (or IT governance working group) assign one or two principles to teams of two to three participants. Have each team identify what this would mean for your organization. Answering the questions:
    • In what ways do our current governance practices support this?
    • What are some examples of changes that would need to be made to make this a reality?
    • How would applying this principle improve your governance?
  3. Have each team present their results and compile the findings and implications in the Governance Workbook to use for future communication of the change.

Specific governing principles

Specific governing principles are refined principles derived from a determining principle, when additional specificity and detail is necessary. It allows you to define an approach for specific behaviors and activities. Multiple specific principles may underpin the determining one.

A visualization of a staircase with stairs labelled, bottom to top, 'Determining Principle', 'Rationale', 'Implications', 'Specific Principles'.

Specific Principles – Related principles that may be required to ensure the implications of the determining principal are addressed within the organization. They may be specific to individual areas and may be addressed in policies.

Implications – The implications of this principle on the organization, specific to how and where governance is executed and the level of information and authority that would be necessary.

Rationale – The reason(s) driving the determining principle.

Determining Principle – A core overarching principle – a defining aspect of your governance model.

1.2.3 Develop your specific governing principles

30 minutes

Input: Updated determining principles

Output: List of specific principles linked to determining principles

Materials: Whiteboard/flip charts, Governance Workbook

Participants: IT senior leadership

  1. Confirm the determining principles for your governance model based on your previous discussions.
  2. Identify where to apply the principles. This is based on:
    1. Your governance scope (how much is within your span of control)
    2. The amount of data you have available
    3. Your cultural readiness for delegation
  3. Create specific principles to support the determining principles:
    1. Document the rationale driving the determining principles.
    2. Identify the implications.
    3. Create specific principles that will support the success in achieving the goals of each determining principle.
  4. Document all information on the “Governance guiding star” slide in the Governance Workbook.

Download the Governance Workbook

Step 1.3

Adjust for Culture and Finalize Context

Activities
  • 1.3.1 Identify and address the impact of attitude, behavior, and culture
  • 1.3.2 Finalize your context

This step will walk you through the following activities:

Identify your organizational attitude, behavior, and culture related to governance.

Identify positives that can be leveraged and develop means to address negatives.

Finalize the context that your model will leverage and align to.

This step involves the following participants:

  • Senior IT leadership
  • Governance leads

Outcomes of this step

Downloaded tool ready to select the base governance model for your organization

Identify Your Governance Needs

Step 1.1 – Define your Guiding Star Step 1.2 – Define Scope and Principles Step 1.3 – Adjust for Culture and Finalize Context

Understanding attitude, behavior, and culture

A

ttitude

What people think and feel. It can be seen in their demeanor and how they react to change initiatives, colleagues, and users. This manifests in the belief that governance is a constraint that needs to be avoided or ignored – often with unintended consequences.

A stock photo of a lightbulb over a person's head and a blackboard behind them reading 'New Mindset - data-verified= New Results'.">

Any form of organizational change involves adjusting people’s attitudes to create buy-in and commitment.

You need to identify and address attitudes that can lead to negative behaviors and actions or that are counter-productive.

Understanding attitude, behavior, and culture

B

ehavior

What people do. This is influenced by attitude and the culture of the organization. In governance, this manifests as people’s willingness to be governed, who pushes back, and who tries to bypass it.

A stock photo of someone walking up a set of stairs into the distant sunlight.

To implement change within IT, especially at a tactical and strategic level, organizational behavior needs to change.

This is relevant because people gravitate toward stability and will resist change in an active or passive way unless you can sell the need, value, and benefit of changing their behavior and way of working.

Understanding attitude, behavior, and culture

C

ulture

The accepted and understood ways of working in an organization. The values and standards that people find normal and what would be tacitly identified to new resources. In governance terms, this is how decisions are really made and where responsibility really exists rather than what is identified formally.

A stock photo of a compass pointing to 'VALUES'.

The impact of the organizational or corporate “attitude” on employee behavior and attitude is often not fully understood.

Culture is an invisible element, which makes it difficult to identify, but it has a strong impact and must be addressed to successfully embed governance models. In the case of automating governance, cultural readiness for automation is a critical success factor.

1.3.1 Identify and address the impact of attitude, behavior, and culture

45 minutes

Input: Senior leadership knowledge

Output: Updated Governance Workbook

Materials: Governance Workbook

Participants: IT senior leadership

  1. Break into three groups. Each group will discuss and document the positive and negative aspects of one of attitude, behavior, or culture related to governance in your organization.
  2. Each group will present and explain their list to the group.
  3. Add any additional suggestions in each area that are identified by the other groups.
  4. Identify the positive elements of attitude, behavior, and culture that would help with changing or implementing your updated governance model.
  5. Identify any challenges that will need to be addressed for the change to be successful.
  6. As a group, brainstorm some mitigations or solutions to these challenges. Document them in the Governance Workbook to be incorporated into the implementation plan.

Download the Governance Workbook

Attitude, behavior, and culture

Evaluate the organization across the three contexts. The positive items represent opportunities for leveraging these characteristics with the implementation of the governance model, while the negative items must be considered and/or mitigated.

Attitude Behavior Culture
Positive
Negative
Mitigation

1.3.2 Finalize your governance context

30 minutes

Input: Documented governance principles and scope from previous exercises

Output: Finalized governance context in the Governance Workbook

Materials: Whiteboard/flip charts, Governance Workbook

Participants: IT senior leadership

  1. Use the information that has been gathered throughout this section to update and finalize your IT governance context.
  2. Document it in your Governance Workbook.

Download the Governance Workbook

Make Your IT Governance Adaptable

Phase 2

Select and Refine Your Governance Model

Phase 1

  • 1.1 Define Your Guiding Star
  • 1.2 Define Scope and Principles
  • 1.3 Adjust for Culture and Finalize Context

Phase 2

  • 2.1 Choose and Adapt Your Model
  • 2.2. Identify and Document Your Governance Triggers
  • 2.3 Build Your Implementation Approach

Phase 3

  • 3.1 Identify Decisions to Embed and Automate
  • 3.2 Plan Validation and Verification
  • 3.3 Update Implementation Plan

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

Select a base governance model and refine it to suit your organization.

Identify scenarios and changes that will trigger updates to your governance model.

Build your implementation plan.

This phase involves the following participants:

  • Senior IT leadership
  • Governance resources

Step 2.1

Choose and Adapt Your Model

Activities
  • 2.1.1 Choose your base governance model
  • 2.1.2 Confirm and adjust the structure of your model
  • 2.1.3 Define the governance responsibilities
  • 2.1.4 Validate the governance mandates and membership
  • 2.1.5 Update your committee processes
  • 2.1.6 Adjust your associated policies
  • 2.1.7 Adjust and confirm your governance model

This step will walk you through the following activities:

Review and selecting your base governance model.

Adjust the structure, responsibilities, policies, mandate, and membership to best support your organization.

This step involves the following participants:

  • Senior IT leadership
  • Governance leads

Outcomes of this step

Downloaded tool ready to select the base governance model for your organization

Select and Refine Your Governance Model

Step 2.1 – Choose and Adapt Your Model Step 2.2 – Identify and Document Your Governance Triggers Step 2.3 – Build Implementation Approach

Your governance framework has six key components

GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK

  • GUIDELINES
    The key behavioral factors that ground your governance framework
  • MEMBERSHIP
    Formalization of who has authority and accountability to make specific governance decisions
  • RESPONSIBILITIES
    The definition of which decisions and outcomes your governance structure and each governance body is accountable for
  • STRUCTURE
    Which governance bodies and roles are in place to articulate where decisions are made in the organization
  • PROCESS
    Identification of the how your governance will be executed, how decisions are made, and the inputs, outputs, and connections to related processes
  • POLICY
    Set of principles established to address risk and drive expected and required behavior

4 layers of governance bodies

There are traditionally 4 layers of governance in an enterprise, and organizations have governing bodies or individuals at each level

RESPONSIBILITIES AND TYPICAL MEMBERSHIP
ENTERPRISE Defines organizational goals. Directs or regulates the performance and behavior of the enterprise, ensuring it has the structure and capabilities to achieve its goals.

Membership: Business executives, Board

STRATEGIC Ensures IT initiatives, products, and services are aligned to organizational goals and strategy and provide expected value. Ensure adherence to key principles.

Membership: Business executives, CIO, CDO

TACTICAL Ensures key activities and planning are in place to execute strategic initiatives.

Membership: Authorized division leadership, related IT leadership

OPERATIONAL Ensures effective execution of day-to-day functions and practices to meet their key objectives.

Membership: Service/product owners, process owners, architecture leadership, directors, managers

2.1.1 Choose your base governance model

30 minutes

Input: Governance models templates

Output: Selected governance model

Materials: Whiteboard/flip charts

Participants: IT senior leadership

  1. Download Info-Tech’s base governance models (Controlled Governance Models Template and IT Governance Program Overview) and review them to find a template that most closely matches your context from Phase 1. You can start with a centralized, decentralized, or product/service hybrid IT organization. Remove unneeded models.
  2. If you do not have documented governance today, start with a controlled model as your foundation. Continue working through this phase if you have a documented governance framework you wish to optimize using our best practices or move to Phase 3 if you are looking to automate or embed your governance activities.

Controlled Governance Models Template

Adaptive Governance Models Template

2.1.2 Confirm and adjust the structure of your model

30-45 minutes

Input: Selected base governance model, Governance context/scope

Output: Updated governance bodies and relationships

Materials: Whiteboard/flip charts

Participants: IT senior leadership

  1. Validate your selected governance body structural model.
    • Are there any governing bodies you must maintain that should replace the ones listed? In part or in full?
    • Are there any missing bodies? Look at alternative committees for examples.
    • Document the adjustments.
  2. Are there any governing bodies that are not required?
    • Based on your size and needs, can they be done within one committee?
    • Is the capability or data not in place to perform the work?
    • Document the required changes.

There are five key areas of governance responsibility

A cyclical visualization of the five keys areas of governance responsibility, 'Strategic Alignment', 'Value Delivery', 'Risk Management', 'Resource Management', and 'Performance Measurement'.

STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
Ensures that technology investments and portfolios are aligned with the organization’s needs.

VALUE DELIVERY
Reviews the outcomes of technology investments and portfolios to ensure benefits realization.

RISK MANAGEMENT
Defines and owns the risk thresholds and register to ensure that decisions made are in line with the posture of the organization.

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Ensures that people, financial knowledge, and technology resources are appropriately allocated across the organization.

PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
Monitors and directs the performance or technology investments to determine corrective actions and understand successes.

2.1.3 Define the governance responsibilities

Ensure you have the right responsibilities in the right place

45-60 minutes

Input: Selected governance base model, Governance context

Output: Updated responsibilities and activities, Updated activities for selected governance bodies, New or removed governing bodies

Materials: Whiteboard/flip charts

Participants: IT senior leadership

  1. Based on your context and model, review the responsibilities identified for each committee and confirm that they align with the mandate and the stated outcome.
  2. Identify and highlight any responsibilities and activities that would not be involved in informing and enabling the mandate of the committee.
  3. Adjust the wording of confirmed responsibilities and activities to reflect your organizational language.
  4. Review each highlighted “bad fit” activity and move it to a committee whose mandate it would support or remove it if it’s not performed in your organization.
  5. If an additional committee is required, define the mandate and scope, then include any additional responsibilities that might have been a bad fit elsewhere

2.1.4 Validate the governance mandates and membership

30 minutes

Input: Selected governance base model, Updated structure and responsibilities

Output: Adjusted mandates and refined committee membership

Materials: Whiteboard/flip charts

Participants: IT senior leadership

  1. Review the mandate and membership slides in your selected governance model.
  2. Adjust the mandate to ensure that it aligns to and conveys:
    1. The outcome that the committee is meant to generate for the organization.
    2. Its scope/span of control.
  3. Discuss the type of information members would require for the committee to be successful in achieving its mandate.
  4. Document the member knowledge requirement in the mandate slide of the model template.

Determine the right membership for your governance

One of the biggest benefits of governance committees is the perspective provided by people from various parts of the organization, which helps to ensure technology investments are aligned with strategic goals. However, having too many people – or the wrong people – involved prevents the committee from being effective. Avoid this by following these principles.

Three principles for selecting committee membership

  1. Determine membership based on responsibilities and required knowledge.
    Organizations often make the mistake of creating committees and selecting members before defining what they will do. This results in poor governance because members don’t have the knowledge required to make decisions. Define the mandate of the committee to determine which members are the right fit.
  2. Ensure members are accountable and authorized to make the decisions.
    Effective governance requires the members to have the authority and accountability to make decisions. This ensures meetings achieve their outcome and produce value, which improves the committee’s chances of survival.
  3. Select leaders who see the big picture.
    Often committee decisions and responsibilities become tangled in the web of organizational politics. Include people, often C-level, whose attendance is critical and who have the requisite knowledge, mindset, and understanding to put business needs ahead of their own.

2.1.5 Update your committee processes

20 minutes

Input: Selected governance base model, Updated structure and responsibilities

Output: Updated committee processes

Materials: Whiteboard/flip charts

Participants: IT senior leadership

  1. Review the committee details based on the changes you have made in goals, mandate, and responsibilities.
  2. Identify and document changes required to the committee outputs (outcomes) and adjust the consumer of the outputs to match.
  3. Review the high-level process steps required to get to the modified output. Add required activities or remove unnecessary ones. Review the process flow. Does it make sense? Are there unnecessary steps?
  4. Review and update inputs required for the process steps and update the information/data sources.
  5. Adjust the detailed process steps to reflect the work that needs to be done to support each high-level process step that changed.

2.1.6 Adjust your associated policies

20 minutes

Input: Selected governance base model, Updated structure and responsibilities

Output: Adjusted mandates and refined committee membership

Materials: Whiteboard/flip charts

Participants: IT senior leadership

  1. Review the policies associated with the governing bodies in your base model. Identify the policies that apply to your organization, those that are missing, and those that are not necessary.
  2. Confirm the policies that you require.
  3. Make sure the policies and policy purposes (or risks and related behaviors the policy addresses) are matched to the governance committee that has responsibilities in that area. Move policies to the right committee.

2.1.7 Adjust and confirm your governance model

  1. Confirm the adjustment of governance bodies, structure, and input/output linkages.
  2. Confirm revisions to decisions and responsibilities.
  3. Confirm policy and regulation/standards associations.
  4. Select related governance committee charters from the provided set and revise the charters to reflect the elements defined in your updated model.
  5. Finalize your governance model.

Samples of slides related to adjusting and confirming governance models in the Governance Workbook.

Step 2.2

Identify and Document Your Governance Triggers

Activities
  • 2.2.1 Identify and document update triggers
  • 2.2.2 Embed triggers into the review cycle

This step will walk you through the following activities:

Identify scenarios that will create a need to review or change your governance model.

Update your review/update approach to receiving trigger notifications.

This step involves the following participants:

  • Senior IT leadership
  • Governance leads

Outcomes of this step

Downloaded tool ready to select the base governance model for your organization

Select and Refine Your Governance Model

Step 2.1 – Choose and Adapt Your Model Step 2.2 – Identify and Document Your Governance Triggers Step 2.3 – Build Implementation Approach

What are governance triggers

Governance triggers are organizational or environmental changes within or around an organization that are inflection points that start the review and revision of governance models to maintain their fit with the organization. This is the key to adaptive governance design.

A target with five arrows sticking out of the bullseye, 'Operating Model', 'Business Strategy', 'Mandate Change', 'Management Practices', and 'Digital Transformation'.

2.2.1 Identify and document update triggers

30 minutes

Input: Governance Workbook

Output: Updated workbook with defined and documented governance triggers, points of origin, and integration

Materials: Whiteboard/flip charts

Participants: IT senior leadership

  1. Open the Governance Workbook to the “Triggers” slides.
  2. Review the list of governance triggers. Retain the ones that apply to your organization, remove those you feel are unnecessary, and add any change scenarios you feel should be included.
  3. Identify where you would receive notifications of these changes and the related processes or activities that would generate these notifications, if applicable.
  4. Document any points of integration required between governance processes and the source process. Highlight any where the integration is not currently in place.

Sample of the 'Triggers' slide in the Governance Workbook.

2.2.2 Embed triggers into the review cycle

30 minutes

Input: Governance model

Output: Review cycle update

Materials: Whiteboard/flip charts

Participants: IT senior leadership

  1. Identify which triggers impact the entire governance model and which impact specific committees.
  2. Add an activity for triggered review of the impacted governance model into your governance committee process.

Step 2.3

Build Your Implementation Approach

Activities
  • 2.3.1 Identify and document your implementation plan
  • 2.3.2 Build your roadmap
  • 2.3.3 Build your sunshine diagram

This step will walk you through the following activities:

Transfer changes to the Governance Implementation Plan Template.

Determine the timing for the implementation phases.

This step involves the following participants:

  • Senior IT leadership
  • Governance process owner

Outcomes of this step

Implementation plan for adaptive governance framework model

Select and Refine Your Governance Model
Step 2.1 – Choose and Adapt Your Model Step 2.2 – Identify and Document Your Governance Triggers Step 2.3 – Build Implementation Approach

2.3.1 Identify and document your implementation plan

60 minutes

Input: Governance model, Guiding principles, Update triggers, Cultural factors and mitigations

Output: Implementation roadmap

Materials: Whiteboard/flip charts

Participants: IT senior leadership

  1. As a group, discuss the changes required to implement the governance model, the cultural items that need to be addressed, and the anticipated timing.
  2. Document the implementation activities and consolidate them into groupings/themes based on similarities or shared outcomes.
  3. Name the grouped themes for clarity and identify key dependencies between activities in each area and across themes.
  4. Identify and document your approach (e.g. continuous, phased) and high-level timeline for implementation.
  5. Document the themes and initiatives in the Governance Implementation Plan.

Download the Governance Implementation Plan

Illustrate the implementation plan using roadmaps

Info-Tech recommends two different methods to roadmap the initiatives in your Governance Implementation Plan.

Gantt Chart
Sample of a Gantt Chart.

This type of roadmap depicts themes, related initiatives, the associated goals, and exact start and end dates for each initiative. This diagram is useful for outlining a larger number of activities and initiatives and has an easily digestible and repeatable format.

Sunshine Diagram
Sample of a Sunshine Diagram.

This type of roadmap depicts themes and their associated initiatives. The start and end dates for the initiatives are approximated based on years or phases. This diagram is useful for highlighting key initiatives on one page.

2.3.2 Build your roadmap

30 minutes

Input: Governance themes and initiatives

Output: roadmap visual

Materials: Governance Roadmap Workbook, Governance Workbook

Participants: CIO, IT senior leadership

  1. Open the Governance Implementation Plan and review themes and initiatives.
  2. Open the Governance Roadmap Workbook.
  3. Discuss whether the implementation roadmap should be developed as a Gantt chart, a sunshine diagram, or both.
    For the Gantt chart:
    • Input the roadmap start year and date.
    • Change the months and year in the Gantt chart to reflect the same roadmap start year.
    • Input and populate the planned start and end dates for the list of high-priority initiatives.

Develop your Gantt chart in the Governance Roadmap Workbook

2.3.3 Build your sunshine diagram

30 minutes

Input: Governance themes and initiatives

Output: Sunshine diagram visual

Materials: Whiteboard/flip charts, Markers, Governance Implementation Plan

Participants: CIO, IT senior leadership

  1. Review your list of themes and initiatives.
  2. Build a model with “rays” radiating out from a central theme or objective.
  3. Using curved arcs, break the grid into timeline periods or phases.
  4. Complete your sunshine diagram in the Governance Implementation Plan.

Customize your sunshine diagram in the Governance Implementation Plan

Make Your IT Governance Adaptable

Phase 3

Embed and Automate

Phase 1

  • 1.1 Define Your Guiding Star
  • 1.2 Define Scope and Principles
  • 1.3 Adjust for Culture and Finalize Context

Phase 2

  • 2.1 Choose and Adapt Your Model
  • 2.2. Identify and Document Your Governance Triggers
  • 2.3 Build Your Implementation Approach

Phase 3

  • 3.1 Identify Decisions to Embed and Automate
  • 3.2 Plan Validation and Verification
  • 3.3 Update Implementation Plan

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

Identify which decisions you are ready to automate.

Identify standards and policies that can be embedded and automated.

Identify integration points.

Confirm data requirements to enable success.

This phase involves the following participants:

  • IT senior leadership
  • Governance process owner
  • Product and service owners
  • Policy owners

Step 3.1

Identify Decisions to Embed and Automate

Activities
  • 3.1.1 Review governance decisions and standards and the required level of authority
  • 3.1.2 Build your decision logic
  • 3.1.3 identify constraints and mitigation approaches
  • 3.1.4 Develop decision rules and principles

This step will walk you through the following activities:

Identify your key decisions.

Develop your decision logic.

Confirm decisions that could be automated.

Identify and address constraints.

Develop decision rules and principles.

This step involves the following participants:

  • IT senior leadership

Outcomes of this step

Developed decision rules, rulesets, and principles that can be leveraged to automate governance

Defined integration points

Embed and Automate

Step 3.1 – Identify Decisions to Embed and Automate Step 3.2 – Plan Validation and Verification Step 3.3 – Update Implementation Plan

What is decision automation?

Decision automation is the codifying of rules that connect the logic of how decisions are made with the data required to make those decisions. This is then embedded and automated into processes and the design of products and services.

  • It is well suited to governance where the same types of decisions are made on a recurring basis, using the same set of data. It requires clean, high-quality data to be effective.
  • Improvements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have allowed the creation of scenarios where a hybrid of rules and learning can improve decision outcomes.

Key Considerations

  • Data Availability
  • Legality
  • Contingencies
  • Decision Transparency
  • Data Quality
  • Auditability

How complexity impacts decisions

Decision complexity impacts the type of rule(s) you create and the amount of data required. It also helps define where or if decisions can be automated.

  1. SIMPLE
    Known and repeatable with consistent and familiar outcomes – structured, causal, and easy to standardize and automate.
  2. COMPLICATED
    Less known and outcomes are not consistently repeatable. Expertise can drive standards and guidelines that can be used to automate decisions.
  3. COMPLEX
    Unknown and new, highly uncertain in terms of outcomes, impact, and data. Requires more exploration and data. Difficult to automate but can be built into the design of products and services.
  4. CHAOTIC
    Unstructured and unknown situation. Requires adaptive and immediate action without active data – requires retained human governance
  5. (Based on Dave Snowden’s Cynefin framework)

Governance Automation Criteria Checklist

The Governance Automation Criteria Checklist provides a view of key considerations for determining whether a governing activity or decision is a good candidate for automation.

The criteria identify key qualifiers/disqualifiers to make it easier to identify eligibility.

Sample of the Governance Automation Criteria Checklist.

Download the Governance Automation Criteria Checklist

Governance Automation Worksheet

Sample of the Governance Automation Worksheet.

The Governance Automation Worksheet provides a way to document your governance and systematically identify information about the decisions to help determine if automation is possible.

From there, decision rules, logic, and rulesets can be designed in support of building a structure flow to allow for automation.

Download the Governance Automation Worksheet

3.1.1 Review governance decisions and standards and the required level of authority

30 minutes

Input: Automation Criteria Checklist, Governance Automation Worksheet, Updated governance model

Output: Documented decisions and related authority, Selected options for automation, Updated Governance Automation Worksheet

Materials: Whiteboard/flip charts, Governance Automation Worksheet

Participants: IT senior leadership

  1. Identify the decisions that are made within each committee in your updated governance model and document them in the Governance Automation Worksheet.
  2. Confirm the level of authority required to make each decision.
  3. Review the automation checklist to confirm whether each decision is positioned well for automation.
  4. Select and document the decisions that are the strongest options for automation/embedding and document them in the Governance Automation Worksheet.

What are decision rules?

Decision rules provide specific instructions and constraints that must be considered in making decisions and are critical for automating governance.

They provide the logical path to assess governance inputs to make effective decisions with positive business outputs.

Inputs would include key information such as known risks, your defined prioritization matrix, portfolio value scoring, and compliance controls.

Individual rules can be leveraged in different places.

Some decision rule types are listed here.

  1. Statement Rules
    Natural expression of logical progression, written through logical elements
  2. Decision Tree Rules
    Decision tree with two axes that overlap to generate a decision
  3. Sequential Rules
    A sequence of decisions that move from one step to the next
  4. Expression Rule
    A particular set of rules triggered by a particular rule condition being met
  5. Truth table rules
    Combines many decision factors into one place; produces different outputs

What are decision rulesets

Rulesets are created to make complex decisions. Individual rule types are combined to create rulesets that are applied together to generate effective decisions. One rule will provide contextual information required for additional rules to execute in a Rule-Result-Rule-Result-Rule-Decision flow.

A visualization of two separate rulesets made up of the decision rules on the previous slide. 'Ruleset 1' contains '1) Statement Rules', '2) Decision Tree Rules', and 5) Truth Table Rules'. 'Ruleset 2' contains '3) Sequential Rules' and '4) Expression Rule'.

3.1.2 Build your decision logic

30 minutes

Input: Governance Automation Worksheet

Output: Documented decision logic to support selected decision types and data requirements

Materials: Whiteboard/flip charts

Participants: IT senior leadership

  1. For each selected decision, identify the principles that drive the considerations around the decision.
  2. For each decision, develop the decision logic by defining the steps and information inputs involved in making the decision and documenting the flow from beginning to end.
  3. Determine whether this is one specific decision or a combination of different decisions (in sequence or based on decisions).
  4. Name your decision rule.

Sample of the Governance Automation Worksheet.

3.1.3 Identify constraints and mitigation approaches

60 minutes
  1. Document constraints to automation of decisions related to:
    • Availability of decision automation tools
    • Decision authority change requirements
    • Data constraints
    • Knowledge requirements
    • Process adjustment requirements
    • Product/service design levels
  2. Brainstorm and identify approaches to mitigate constraints and score based on likelihood of success.
  3. Identify mitigation owners and initial timeline expectations.
  4. Document the constraints and mitigations in the Governance Workbook on the constraints and mitigations slide.

Sample of the 'Constraints and mitigations' slide of the 'Governance Workbook'.

3.1.4 Develop decision rules and principles

1.5-2 hours

Input: Governance Automation Worksheet

Output: Defined decision integration points, Confirmed data availability sets, Decision rules, rulesets, and principles with control indicators

Materials: Whiteboard/flip charts, Governance Automation Worksheet

Participants: IT senior leadership

  1. Review the decision logic for those decisions that you have confirmed for automation. Identify the processes where the decision should be executed.
  2. Associate each decision with specific process steps or stages or how it would be included in software/product design.
  3. For each selected decision, identify the availability of data required to support the decision logic and the level of complexity and apply governing principles.
  4. Create the decision rules and identify data gaps.
  5. Define the decision flow and create rulesets as needed.
  6. Confirm automation requirements and define control indicators.

Step 3.2

Plan Validation and Verification

Activities
  • 3.2.1 Define verification approach for embedded and automated governance
  • 3.2.2 Define validation approach for embedded and automated governance

This step will walk you through the following activities:

Define how decision outcomes will be measured.

Determine how the effectiveness of automated governance will be reported.

This step involves the following participants:

  • IT senior leadership

Outcomes of this step

Tested and verified automation of decisions

Embed and Automate

Step 3.1 – Identify Decisions to Embed and Automate Step 3.2 – Plan Validation and Verification Step 3.3 – Update Implementation Plan

Decision rule relationship through to verification

1. Rules

Focus on clear decision logic

Often represented in simple statement types and supported by data:

IF – THEN

IF – AND – THEN

IF – AND NOT – THEN

2. Rulesets

Aggregate rules for more complex decisions

Integrated flows between different required rules:
Rule 1:
(Output 1) – Rule 2
(Output 2) – Rule 6
Rule 6: (Output 1) – Rule 7
3. Rule Attestation

Verify success of automated decisions

Attestation of embedded and automated rules with key control indicators embedded within process and products.

Principles embedded into automated software controls.

3.2.1 Define verification approach for embedded and automated governance

60 minutes

Input: Governance rules and rulesets as defined in the Governance Automation Worksheet, Defined decision outcomes

Output: A defined measurement of effective decision outcomes, Approach to automate and/or report the effectiveness of automated governance

Materials: Whiteboard/flip charts

Participants: IT senior leadership

Verify

  1. Confirm expected outcome of rules.
  2. Select a sampling of new required decisions or recently performed decisions related to areas of automation.
  3. Run the decisions through the decision rules or rule groupings that were developed and compare to parallel decisions made using the traditional approach. (These must be segregated activities.)
  4. Review the outcome of the rules and adjust based on the output. Identify areas of adjustment. Confirm that the automation meets your requirements.

3.2.2 Define validation approach for embedded and automated governance

60 minutes

Input: Governance rules and rulesets as defined in the Governance Automation Worksheet, Defined decision outcomes

Output: Defined assurance and attestation requirements, Key control indicators that can be automated

Materials: Whiteboard/flip charts

Participants: IT senior leadership

Validate

  1. Develop an approach to measure automated decisions. Align success criteria to current governance KPIs and metrics.
  2. If no such metrics exist, define expected outcome. Define key risk indicators based on the expected points of automation.
  3. Establish quality assurance checkpoints within the delivery lifecycles to adjust for variance.
  4. Create triggers back to rule owners to drive changes and improvements to rules and rule groupings.

Step 3.3

Update Implementation Plan

Activities
  • 3.3.1 Finalize the implementation plan

This step will walk you through the following activities:

Review implications and mitigations to make sure all have been considered.

Finalize the implementation plan and roadmap.

This step involves the following participants:

  • Senior IT leadership

Outcomes of this step

Completed Governance implementation plan and roadmap

Embed and Automate

Step 3.1 – Identify Decisions to Embed and Automate Step 3.2 – Plan Validation and Verification Step 3.3 – Update Implementation Plan

3.3.1 Finalize the implementation plan

30 minutes

Input: Governance workbook, Updated governance model, Draft implementation plan and roadmap

Output: Finalized implementation plan and roadmap

Materials: Whiteboard/flip charts, Governance Implementation Plan

Participants: IT senior leadership

  1. Document automation activities within phases in a governance automation theme in the Governance Implementation Plan.
  2. Review timelines in the implementation plan and where automation fits within the roadmap.
  3. Updated the implementation plan and roadmap.

Governance Implementation Plan

Summary of Accomplishment

Problem Solved

Through this project we have:

  • Improved your governance model to ensure a better fit for your organization, while creating adaptivity for the future.
  • Ensured your governance operates as an enabler of success with the proper bodies and levels of authority established.
  • Established triggers to ensure your governance model is actively adjusted to maintain its fit.
  • Developed a plan to embed and automate governance.
  • Created decision rules and principles and identified where to embed them within your practices.

If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

Contact your account representative for more information.

workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

Additional Support

If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

Photo of Valence Howden.

Contact your account representative for more information.

workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.

Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.

Related Info-Tech Research

Improve IT Governance to Drive Business Results

Avoid bureaucracy and achieve alignment with a minimalist approach. Align with your organizational context.

Establish Data Governance

Establish data trust and accountability with strong governance.

Maximize Business Value From IT Through Benefits Realization

Embed value and alignment confirmation into your governance to ensure you optimize IT value achievement for resource spend.

Build a Better Product Owner

Strengthen the product/service owner role in your organization by focusing on core capabilities and proper alignment.

Research contributors and experts

Photo of Sidney Hodgson, Senior Director, Industry, Info-Tech Research Group. Sidney Hodgson
Senior Director, Industry
Info-Tech Research Group
  • Sidney has over 30 years of experience in IT leadership roles as CIO of three organizations in Canada and the US as well as international consulting experience in the US and Asia.
  • Sid has a breadth of knowledge in IT governance, project management, strategic and operational planning, enterprise architecture, business process re-engineering, IT cost reduction, and IT turnaround management.
Photo of David Tomljenovic, Principal Research Advisor, Industry, Info-Tech Research Group. David Tomljenovic
Principal Research Advisor, Industry
Info-Tech Research Group
  • David brings extensive experience from the Financial Services sector, having worked 25 years on Bay Street. Most recently he was a Corporate Finance and Strategy Advisor for Infiniti Labs (Toronto/Hong Kong), Automotive, and Smart City Accelerator, where he provided financial and mergers & acquisitions advisory services to accelerator participants with a focus on early-stage fundraising activities.

Research contributors and experts

Photo of Cole Cioran, Practice Lead, Applications and Agile Development, Info-Tech Research Group. Cole Cioran
Practice Lead, Applications and Agile Development
Info-Tech Research Group
  • Over the past 25 years, Cole has developed software; designed data, infrastructure, and software solutions; defined systems and enterprise architectures; delivered enterprise-wide programs; and managed software development, infrastructure, and business systems analysis practices.
Photo of Crystal Singh, Research Director, Applications – Data and Information Management, Info-Tech Research Group. Crystal Singh
Research Director, Applications – Data and Information Management
Info-Tech Research Group
  • Crystal brings a diverse and global perspective to her role, drawing from her professional experiences in various industries and locations. Prior to joining Info-Tech, Crystal led the Enterprise Data Services function at Rogers Communications, one of Canada’s leading telecommunications companies.

Research contributors and experts

Photo of Carlene McCubbin, Practice Lead, CIO, Info-Tech Research Group. Carlene McCubbin
Practice Lead, CIO
Info-Tech Research Group
  • Carlene covers key topics in organization and leadership and specializes in governance, organizational design, relationship management, and human capital development. She led the development of Info-Tech’s Organization and Leadership practice.
Photo of Denis Goulet, Senior Workshop Director, Info-Tech Research Group. Denis Goulet
Senior Workshop Director
Info-Tech Research Group
  • Denis is a transformational leader and experienced strategist who focuses on helping clients communicate, relate, and adapt for success. Having developed Governance Model and IT strategies in organizations ranging from small to billion-dollar multi-nationals, he firmly believes in a collaborative value-driven approach to work.

Bibliography

“2020 State of Data Governance and Automation Report.” Erwin.com, 28 Jan. 2020. Web.

“Adaptive IT Governance.” Google search, 15 Nov. 2020.

“Adaptive IT Governance Framework.” CIO Index, 3 Nov. 2011. Accessed 15 Nov. 2020.

“Agile Governance Made Easy.” Agilist, n.d. Accessed 15 Nov. 2020.

“Automating Governance — Our Work.” Humanising Machine Intelligence, n.d. Accessed 15 Nov. 2020.

“Automation – Decisions.” IBM, 2020. Accessed 15 Oct. 2020.

Chang, Charlotte. “Accelerating Agile through effective governance.” Medium, 22 Sept. 2020. Web.

“COBIT 5: Enabling Processes.” ISACA, 2012. Web. Oct. 2016.

COBIT 2019. ISACA, Dec. 2018. Web.

Curtis, Blake. “The Value of IT Governance.” ISACA, 29 June 2020. Accessed 15 Nov. 2020.

De Smet, Aaron. “Three Keys to Faster, Better Decisions.” McKinsey & Company, 1 May 2019. Accessed 15 Nov. 2020.

“Decision Rules and Decision Analysis.” Navex Global, 2020. Web.

“Decisions Automation with Business Rules Management Solution.” Sumerge, 4 Feb. 2020. Accessed 15 Nov. 2020.

“DevGovOps – Key factors for IT governance for enterprises in a DevOps world.” Capgemini, 27 Sept. 2019. Web.

Eisenstein, Lena. “IT Governance Checklist.” BoardEffect, 19 Feb. 2020. Accessed 15 Nov. 2020.

“Establishing Effective IT and Data Governance.” Chartered Professional Accountants Canada, n.d. Accessed 15 Nov. 2020.

Gandzeichuk, Ilya. “Augmented Analytics: From Decision Support To Intelligent Decision-Making.” Forbes, 8 Jan. 2020. Accessed 15 Nov. 2020.

Georgescu, Vlad. “What Is IT Governance? Understanding From First Principles.” Plutora, 18 Oct. 2019. Web.

Goodwin, Bill. “IT Governance in the Era of Shadow IT.” ComputerWeekly, 5 Aug. 2014. Accessed 15 Nov. 2020.

“Governance of IT, OT and IOT.” ISACA Journal, 2019. Web.

Gritsenko, Daria, and Matthew Wood. “Algorithmic Governance: A Modes of Governance Approach.” Regulation & Governance, 10 Nov. 2020. Web.

Hansert, Philipp. “Adaptive IT Governance with Clausmark’s Bee4IT.” Bee360, 25 Oct. 2019. Accessed 15 Nov. 2020.

Havelock, Kylie. “What Does Good Product Governance Look Like?” Medium. 8 Jan. 2020. Web.

Haven, Dolf van der. “Governance of IT with ISO 38500 - A More Detailed View” LinkedIn article, 24 Oct. 2016. Accessed 15 Nov. 2020.

Hong, Sounman, and Sanghyun Lee. “Adaptive Governance and Decentralization: Evidence from Regulation of the Sharing Economy in Multi-Level Governance.” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 2, April 2018, pp. 299–305. Web.

ISACA. “Monthly Seminar & Networking Dinner: CIO Dashboard.” Cvent, Feb. 2012. Accessed 15 Nov. 2020.

ISO/IEC 38500, ISO, 2018 and ongoing.

“IT Governance.” Kenway Consulting, n.d. Accessed 15 Nov. 2020.

“IT Governance in the Age of COVID 19.” Union of Arab Banks Webinar, 19-21 Oct. 2020. Accessed 15 Nov. 2020.

Jaffe, Dennis T. “Introducing the Seven Pillars of Governance.” Triple Pundit, 15 Nov. 2011. Accessed 15 Nov. 2020.

Janssen, Marijn, and Haiko van der Voort. “Agile and Adaptive Governance in Crisis Response: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic.” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 55, December 2020. Web.

Jodya, Tiffany. “Automating Enterprise Governance within Delivery Pipelines.” Harness.io, 14 May 2020. Web.

Kumar, Sarvesh. “AI-Based Decision-Making Automation.” Singular Intelligence, 17 June 2019. Web.

“Lean IT Governance.” Disciplined Agile, n.d. Accessed 15 Nov. 2020.

Lerner, Mark. “Government Tech Projects Fail by Default. It Doesn’t Have to Be This Way.” Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, 21 Oct. 2020. Accessed 15 Nov. 2020.

Levstek, Aleš, Tomaž Hovelja, and Andreja Pucihar. “IT Governance Mechanisms and Contingency Factors: Towards an Adaptive IT Governance Model.” Organizacija, vol. 51, no. 4, Nov. 2018. Web.

Maccani, Giovanni, et al. “An Emerging Typology of IT Governance Structural Mechanisms in Smart Cities.” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 4, Oct. 2020. Web.

Magowan, Kirstie. “IT Governance vs IT Management: Mastering the Differences.” BMC Blogs, 18 May 2020. Accessed 15 Nov. 2020.

Mazmanian, Adam. “Is It Time to Rethink IT Governance? ” Washington Technology, 26 Oct. 2020. Accessed 15 Nov. 2020.

Mukherjee, Jayanto. “6 Components of an Automation (DevOps) Governance Model.” Sogeti, n.d. Accessed 15 Nov. 2020.

Ng, Cindy. “The Difference Between Data Governance and IT Governance.” Inside Out Security, updated 17 June 2020. Web.

Pearson, Garry. “Agile or Adaptive Governance Required?” Taking Care of the Present (blog), 30 Oct. 2020. Accessed 15 Nov. 2020.

Peregrine, Michael, et al. “The Long-Term Impact of the Pandemic on Corporate Governance.” Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, 16 July 2020. Web.

Raymond, Louis, et al. “Determinants and Outcomes of IT Governance in Manufacturing SMEs: A Strategic IT Management Perspective.” International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, vol. 35, December 2019. Web.

Rentrop, Christopher. “Adaptive IT Governance – Foundation of a Successful Digitalization.” Business IT Cooperation Coordination Controlling (blog). May 2, 2018. Web.

Schultz, Lisen, et al. “Adaptive Governance, Ecosystem Management, and Natural Capital.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 112, no. 24, 2015, pp. 7369–74. Web.

Selig, Gad J. Implementing IT Governance: A Practical Guide to Global Best Practices in IT Management. Van Haren Publishing, 2008. Accessed 15 Nov. 2020.

Sharma, Chiatan. “Rule Governance for Enterprise-Wide Adoption of Business Rules: Why Does a BRMS Implementation Need a Governance Framework?” Business Rules Journal, vol. 13, no. 4, April 2012. Accessed 15 Nov. 2020.

Smallwood, Robert. “Information Governance, IT Governance, Data Governance – What’s the Difference?” The Data Administration Newsletter, 3 June 2020. Accessed 15 Nov. 2020.

Snowden, Dave. "Cynefin – weaving sense-making into the fabric of our world", Cognitive Edge, 20 October 2020.

“The Place of IT Governance in the Enterprise Governance.” Institut de la Gouvernance des Systemes d’Information, 2005. Accessed 15 Nov. 2020.

Thomas, Mark. “Demystifying IT Governance Roles in a Dynamic Business Environment.” APMG International, 29 Oct. 2020. Webinar. Accessed 15 Nov. 2020.

“The Four Pillars of Governance Best Practice.” The Institute of Directors in New Zealand, 4 Nov. 2019. Web.

Wang, Cancan, Rony Medaglia, and Lei Zheng. “Towards a Typology of Adaptive Governance in the Digital Government Context: The Role of Decision-Making and Accountability.” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 2, April 2018, pp. 306–22.

Westland, Jason. “IT Governance: Definitions, Frameworks and Planning.” ProjectManager.com, 17 Dec. 2019. Web.

Wilkin, Carla L., and Jon Riddett. “IT Governance Challenges in a Large Not-for-Profit Healthcare Organization: The Role of Intranets.” Electronic Commerce Research vol. 9, no. 4, 2009, pp. 351-74. Web.

Zalnieriute, Monika, et al. “The Rule of Law and Automation of Government Decision Making.” Modern Law Review, 25 Feb. 2019. Web.

Determine Your Zero Trust Readiness

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}249|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: 9.8/10 Overall Impact
  • member rating average dollars saved: $24,574 Average $ Saved
  • member rating average days saved: 12 Average Days Saved
  • Parent Category Name: Security Strategy & Budgeting
  • Parent Category Link: /security-strategy-and-budgeting

CISOs pushing for zero trust as their security strategy face several challenges including:

  • Understanding and clarifying the benefits of zero trust for the organization.
  • The inability to verify all business operations are maintaining security best practices.
  • Convincing business units to add more security controls that go against the grain of reducing friction in workflows while still demonstrating these controls support the business.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • Zero trust must benefit the business and security. Because the road to zero trust is an iterative process, IT security will need to constantly determine how different areas of zero trust will affect core business processes.
  • Zero trust reduces reliance on perimeter security. Zero trust is a strategy that solves how to move beyond the reliance on perimeter security and move controls to where the user accesses resources.
  • Not everyone can achieve zero trust, but everyone can adopt it. Zero trust will be different for every organization and may not be applicable in every control area. This means that zero trust is not a one-size-fits-all approach to IT security. Zero trust is the goal, but some organizations can only get so close to the ideal.

Impact and Result

Zero trust is a journey that uses multiple capabilities and requires multiple parties to contribute to an organization’s security. Use Info-Tech’s approach to:

  • Understand zero trust as a strategic platform for building your security roadmap.
  • Assess your current state and determine the benefits of adopting zero trust to help plan your roadmap.
  • Separate vendors from the hype surrounding zero trust to adopt a vendor-agnostic approach to your zero trust planning.

Determine Your Zero Trust Readiness Research & Tools

Start here – read the Executive Brief

Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should determine your zero trust readiness, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the ways we can support you in completing this project.

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Understand zero trust

Recognize the zero trust ideal and understand the different zero trust schools of thought.

2. Assess your zero trust readiness

Assess and determine the benefits of zero trust and identify and evaluate vendors in the zero trust market.

  • Zero Trust Security Benefit Assessment Tool
[infographic]

Considerations for a Hub and Spoke Model When Deploying Infrastructure in the Cloud

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}472|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: N/A
  • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
  • member rating average days saved: N/A
  • Parent Category Name: Cloud Strategy
  • Parent Category Link: /cloud-strategy
  • The organization is planning to move resources to cloud or devise a networking strategy for their existing cloud infrastructure to harness value from cloud.
  • The right topology needs to be selected to deploy network level isolation, design the cloud for management efficiencies and provide access to shared services on cloud.
  • A perennial challenge for infrastructure on cloud is planning for governance vs flexibility which is often overlooked.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

Don’t wait until the necessity arises to evaluate your networking in the cloud. Get ahead of the curve and choose the topology that optimizes benefits and supports organizational needs in the present and the future.

Impact and Result

  • Define organizational needs and understand the pros and cons of cloud network topologies to strategize for the networking design.
  • Consider the layered complexities of addressing the governance vs. flexibility spectrum for your domains when designing your networks.

Considerations for a Hub and Spoke Model When Deploying Infrastructure in the Cloud Research & Tools

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Considerations for a Hub and Spoke Model When Deploying Infrastructure in the Cloud Deck – A document to guide you through designing your network in the cloud.

What cloud networking topology should you use? How do you provide access to shared resources in the cloud or hybrid infrastructure? What sits in the hub and what sits in the spoke?

  • Considerations for a Hub and Spoke Model When Deploying Infrastructure in the Cloud Storyboard
[infographic]

Further reading

Considerations for a Hub and Spoke Model When Deploying Infrastructure in the Cloud

Don't revolve around a legacy design; choose a network design that evolves with the organization.

Analyst Perspective

Cloud adoption among organizations increases gradually across both the number of services used and the amount those services are used. However, network builders tend to overlook the vulnerabilities of network topologies, which leads to complications down the road, especially since the structures of cloud network topologies are not all of the same quality. A network design that suits current needs may not be the best solution for the future state of the organization.

Even if on-prem network strategies were retained for ease of migration, it is important to evaluate and identify the cloud network topology that can not only elevate the performance of your infrastructure in the cloud, but also that can make it easier to manage and provision resources.

An "as the need arises" strategy will not work efficiently since changing network designs will change the way data travels within your network, which will then need to be adopted to existing application architectures. This becomes more complicated as the number of services hosted in the cloud grows.

Keep a network strategy in place early on and start designing your infrastructure accordingly. This gives you more control over your networks and eliminates the need for huge changes to your infrastructure down the road.

This is a picture of Nitin Mukesh

Nitin Mukesh
Senior Research Analyst, Infrastructure and Operations
Info-Tech Research Group

Executive Summary

Your Challenge

The organization is planning to move resources to the cloud or devise a networking strategy for their existing cloud infrastructure to harness value from the cloud.

The right topology needs to be selected to deploy network level isolation, design the cloud for management efficiencies, and provide access to shared services in the cloud.

A perennial challenge for infrastructure in the cloud is planning for governance vs. flexibility, which is often overlooked.

Common Obstacles

The choice of migration method may result in retaining existing networking patterns and only making changes when the need arises.

Networking in the cloud is still new, and organizations new to the cloud may not be aware of the cloud network designs they can consider for their business needs.

Info-Tech's Approach

Define organizational needs and understand the pros and cons of cloud network topologies to strategize for the networking design.

Consider the layered complexities of addressing the governance vs. flexibility spectrum for your domains when designing your networks.

Insight Summary

Don't wait until the necessity arises to evaluate your networking in the cloud. Get ahead of the curve and choose the topology that optimizes benefits and supports organizational needs in the present and future.

Your challenge

Selecting the right topology: Many organizations migrate to the cloud retaining a mesh networking topology from their on-prem design, or they choose to implement the mesh design leveraging peering technologies in the cloud without a strategy in place for when business needs change. While there may be many network topologies for on-prem infrastructure, the network design team may not be aware of the best approach in cloud platforms for their requirements, or a cloud networking strategy may even go overlooked during the migration.

Finding the right cloud networking infrastructure for:

  • Management efficiencies
  • Network-level isolation of resources
  • Access to shared services

Deciding between governance and flexibility in networking design: In the hub and spoke model, if a domain is in the hub, the greater the governance over it, and if it sits in the spoke, the higher the flexibility. Having a strategy for the most important domains is key. For example, some security belongs in the hub and some security belongs in the spoke. The tradeoff here is if it sits completely in the spoke, you give it a lot of freedom, but it becomes harder to standardize across the organization.

Mesh network topology

A mesh is a design where virtual private clouds (VPCs) are connected to each other individually creating a mesh network. The network traffic is fast and can be redirected since the nodes in the network are interconnected. There is no hierarchical relationship between the networks, and any two networks can connect with each other directly.

In the cloud, this design can be implemented by setting up peering connections between any two VPCs. These VPCs can also be set up to communicate with each other internally through the cloud service provider's network without having to route the traffic via the internet.

While this topology offers high redundancy, the number of connections grows tremendously as more networks are added, making it harder to scale a network using a mesh topology.

Mesh Network on AWS

This is an image of a Mesh Network on AWS

Source: AWS, 2018

Constraints

The disadvantages of peering VPCs into a mesh quickly arise with:

  • Transitive connections: Transitive connections are not supported in the cloud, unlike with on-prem networking. This means that if there are two networks that need to communicate, a single peering link can be set up between them. However, if there are more than two networks and they all need to communicate, they should all be connected to each other with separate individual connections.
  • Cost of operation: The lack of transitive routing requires many connections to be set up, which adds up to a more expensive topology to operate as the number of networks grows. Cloud providers also usually limit the number of peering networks that can be set up, and this limit can be hit with as few as 100 networks.
  • Management: Mesh tends to be very complicated to set up, owing to the large number of different peering links that need to be established. While this may be manageable for small organizations with small operations, for larger organizations with robust cybersecurity practices that require multiple VPCs to be deployed and interconnected for communications, mesh opens you up to multiple points of failure.
  • Redundancy: With multiple points of failure already being a major drawback of this design, you also cannot have more than one peered connection between any two networks at the same time. This makes designing your networking systems for redundancy that much more challenging.
Number of virtual networks 10 20 50 100
Peering links required
[(n-1)*n]/2
45 190 1225 4950

Proportional relationship of virtual networks to required peering links in a mesh topology

Case study

INDUSTRY: Blockchain
SOURCE: Microsoft

An organization with four members wants to deploy a blockchain in the cloud, with each member running their own virtual network. With only four members on the team, a mesh network can be created in the cloud with each of their networks being connected to each other, adding up to a total of 12 peering connections (four members with three connections each). While the members may all be using different cloud accounts, setting up connections between them will still be possible.

The organization wants to expand to 15 members within the next year, with each new member being connected with their separate virtual networks. Once grown, the organization will have a total of 210 peering connections since each of the virtual networks will then need 14 peering connections. While this may still be possible to deploy, the number of connections makes it harder to manage and would be that much more difficult to deploy if the organization grows to even 30 or 40 members. The new scale of virtual connections calls for an alternative networking strategy that cloud providers offer – the hub and spoke topology.

This is an image of the connections involved in a mesh network with four participants.

Source: Microsoft, 2017

Hub and spoke network topology

In hub and spoke network design, each network is connected to a central network that facilitates intercommunication between the networks. The central network, also called the hub, can be used by multiple workloads/servers/services for hosting services and for managing external connectivity. Other networks connected to the hub through network peering are called spokes and host workloads.

Communications between the workloads/servers/services on spokes pass in or out of the hub where they are inspected and routed. The spokes can also be centrally managed from the hub with IT rules and processes.

A hub and spoke design enable a larger number of virtual networks to be interconnected as each network only needs one peered connection (to the hub) to be able to communicate with any other network in the system.

Hub and Spoke Network on AWS

This is an image of the Hub and Spoke Network on AWS

What hub and spoke networks do better

  1. Ease of connectivity: Hub and spoke decreases the liabilities of scale that come from a growing business by providing a consistent connection that can be scaled easily. As more networks are added to an organization, each will only need to be connected once – to the hub. The number of connections is considerably lower than in a mesh topology and makes it easier to maintain and manage.
  2. Business agility and scalability: It is easier to increase the number of networks than in mesh, making it easier to grow your business into new channels with less time, investment, and risk.
  3. Data collection: With a hub and spoke design, all data flows through the hub – depending on the design, this includes all ingress and egress to and from the system. This makes it an excellent central network to collect all business data.
  4. Network-level isolation: Hub and spoke enables separation of workloads and tiers into different networks. This is particularly useful to ensure an issue affecting a network or a workload does not affect the rest.
  5. Network changes: Changes to a separated network are much easier to carry out knowing the changes made will not affect all the other connected networks. This reduces work-hours significantly when systems or applications need to be altered.
  6. Compliance: Compliance requirements such as SOC 1 and SOC 2 require separate environments for production, development, and testing, which can be done in a hub and spoke model without having to re-create security controls for all networks.

Hub and spoke constraints

While there are plenty of benefits to using this topology, there are still a few notable disadvantages with the design.

Point-to-point peering

The total number of total peered connections required might be lower than mesh, but the cost of running independent projects is cheaper on mesh as point-to-point data transfers are cheaper.

Global access speeds with a monolithic design

With global organizations, implementing a single monolithic hub network for network ingress and egress will slow down access to cloud services that users will require. A distributed network will ramp up the speeds for its users to access these services.

Costs for a resilient design

Connectivity between the spokes can fail if the hub site dies or faces major disruptions. While there are redundancy plans for cloud networks, it will be an additional cost to plan and build an environment for it.

Leverage the hub and spoke strategy for:

Providing access to shared services: Hub and spoke can be used to give workloads that are deployed on different networks access to shared services by placing the shared service in the hub. For example, DNS servers can be placed in the hub network, and production or host networks can be connected to the hub to access it, or if the central network is set up to host Active Directory services, then servers in other networks can act as spokes and have full access to the central VPC to send requests. This is also a great way to separate workloads that do not need to communicate with each other but all need access to the same services.

Adding new locations: An expanding organization that needs to add additional global or domestic locations can leverage hub and spoke to connect new network locations to the main system without the need for multiple connections.

Cost savings: Apart from having fewer connections than mesh that can save costs in the cloud, hub and spoke can also be used to centralize services such as DNS and NAT to be managed in one location rather than having to individually deploy in each network. This can bring down management efforts and costs considerably.

Centralized security: Enterprises can deploy a center of excellence on the hub for security, and the spokes connected to it can leverage a higher level of security and increase resilience. It will also be easier to control and manage network policies and networking resources from the hub.

Network management: Since each spoke is peered only once to the hub, detecting connectivity problems or other network issues is made simpler in hub and spoke than on mesh. A network manager deployed on the cloud can give access to network problems faster than on other topologies.

Hub and spoke – mesh hybrid

The advantages of using a hub and spoke model far exceed those of using a mesh topology in the cloud and go to show why most organizations ultimately end up using the hub and spoke as their networking strategy.

However, organizations, especially large ones, are complex entities, and choosing only one model may not serve all business needs. In such cases, a hybrid approach may be the best strategy. The following slides will demonstrate the advantages and use cases for mesh, however limited they might be.

Where it can be useful:

An organization can have multiple network topologies where system X is a mesh and system Y is a hub and spoke. A shared system Z can be a part of both systems depending on the needs.

An organization can have multiple networks interconnected in a mesh and some of the networks in the mesh can be a hub for a hub-spoke network. For example, a business unit that works on data analysis can deploy their services in a spoke that is connected to a central hub that can host shared services such as Active Directory or NAT. The central hub can then be connected to a regional on-prem network where data and other shared services can be hosted.

Hub and spoke – mesh hybrid network on AWS

This is an image of the Hub and spoke – mesh hybrid network on AWS

Why mesh can still be useful

Benefits Of Mesh

Use Cases For Mesh

Security: Setting up a peering connection between two VPCs comes with the benefit of improving security since the connection can be private between the networks and can isolate public traffic from the internet. The traffic between the networks never has to leave the cloud provider's network, which helps reduce a class of risks.

Reduced network costs: Since the peered networks communicate internally through the cloud's internal networks, the data transfer costs are typically cheaper than over the public internet.

Communication speed: Improved network latency is a key benefit from using mesh because the peered traffic does not have to go over the public internet but rather the internal network. The network traffic between the connections can also be quickly redirected as needed.

Higher flexibility for backend services: Mesh networks can be desirable for back-end services if egress traffic needs to be blocked to the public internet from the deployed services/servers. This also helps avoid having to set up public IP or network address translation (NAT) configurations.

Connecting two or more networks for full access to resources: For example, consider an organization that has separate networks for each department, which don't all need to communicate with each other. Here, a peering network can be set up only between the networks that need to communicate with full or partial access to each other such as finance to HR or accounting to IT.

Specific security or compliance need: Mesh or VPC peering can also come in handy to serve specific security needs or logging needs that require using a network to connect to other networks directly and in private. For example, global organizations that face regulatory requirements of storing or transferring data domestically with private connections.

Systems with very few networks that do not need internet access: Workloads deployed in networks that need to communicate with each other but do not require internet access or network address translation (NAT) can be connected using mesh especially when there are security reasons to keep them from being connected to the main system, e.g. backend services such as testing environments, labs, or sandboxes can leverage this design.

Designing for governance vs. flexibility in hub and spoke

Governance and flexibility in managing resources in the cloud are inversely proportional: The higher the governance, the less freedom you have to innovate.

The complexities of designing an organization's networks grow with the organization as it becomes global and takes on more services and lines of business. Organizations that choose to deploy the hub and spoke model face a dilemma in choosing between governance and flexibility for their networks. Organizations need to find that sweet spot to find the right balance between how much they want to govern their systems, mainly for security- and cost-monitoring, and how much flexibility they want to provide for innovation and other operations, since the two usually tend to have an inverse relationship.

This decision in hub and spoke usually means that the domains chosen for higher governance must be placed in the hub network, and the domains that need more flexibility in a spoke. The key variables in the following slide will help determine the placement of the domain and will depend entirely on the organization's context.

The two networking patterns in the cloud have layered complexities that need to be systematically addressed.

Designing for governance vs. flexibility in hub and spoke

If a network has more flexibility in all or most of these domains, it may be a good candidate for a spoke-heavy design; otherwise, it may be better designed in a hub-centric pattern.

  • Function: The function the domain network is assigned to and the autonomy the function needs to be successful. For example, software R&D usually requires high flexibility to be successful.
  • Regulations: The extent of independence from both internal and external regulatory constraints the domain has. For example, a treasury reporting domain typically has high internal and external regulations to adhere to.
  • Human resources: The freedom a domain has to hire and manage its resources to perform its function. For example, production facilities in a huge organization have the freedom to manage their own resources.
  • Operations: The freedom a domain has to control its operations and manage its own spending to perform its functions. For example, governments usually have different departments and agencies, each with its own budget to perform its functions.
  • Technology: The independence and the ability a domain has to manage its selection and implementation of technology resources in the cloud. For example, you may not want a software testing team to have complete autonomy to deploy resources.

Optimal placement of services between the hub and spoke

Shared services and vendor management

Resources that are shared between multiple projects or departments or even by the entire organization should be hosted on the hub network to simplify sharing these services. For example, e-learning applications that may be used by multiple business units to train their teams, Active Directory accessed by most teams, or even SAAS platforms such as O365 and Salesforce can leverage buying power and drive down the costs for the organization. Shared services should also be standardized across the organization and for that, it needs to have high governance.

Services that are an individual need for a network and have no preexisting relationship with other networks or buying power and scale can be hosted in a spoke network. For example, specialized accounting software used exclusively by the accounting team or design software used by a single team. Although the services are still a part of the wider network, it helps separate duties from the shared services network and provides flexibility to the teams to customize and manage their services to suit their individual needs.

Network egress and interaction

Network connections, be they in the cloud or hybrid-cloud, are used by everyone to either connect to the internet, access cloud services, or access the organization's data center. Since this is a shared service, a centralized networking account must be placed in the hub for greater governance. Interactions between the spokes in a hub and spoke model happens through the hub, and providing internet access to the spokes through the hub can help leverage cost benefits in the cloud. The network account will perform routing duties between the spokes, on-prem assets, and egress out to the internet.

For example, NAT gateways in the cloud that are managed services are usually charged by the hour, and deploying NAT on each spoke can be harder to manage and expensive to maintain. A NAT gateway deployed in a central networking hub can be accessed by all spokes, so centralizing it is a great option.

Note that, in some cases, when using edge locations for data transfers, it may be cost effective to deploy a NAT in the spoke, but such cases usually do not apply to most organizational units.

A centralized network hub can also be useful to configure network policies and network resources while organizational departments can configure non-network resources, which helps separate responsibilities for all the spokes in the system. For example, subnets and routes can be controlled from the central network hub to ensure standardized network policies across the network.

Security

While there needs to be security in the hub and the spokes individually, finding the balance of operation can make the systems more robust. Hub and spoke design can be an effective tool for security when a principal security hub is hosted in the hub network. The central security hub can collect data from the spokes as well as non-spoke sources such as regulatory bodies and threat intelligence providers, and then share the information with the spokes.

Threat information sharing is a major benefit of using this design, and the hub can take actions to analyze and enrich the data before sharing it with spokes. Shared services such as threat intelligence platforms (TIP) can also benefit from being centralized when stationed in the hub. A collective defense approach between the hub and spoke can be very successful in addressing sophisticated threats.

Compliance and regulatory requirements such as HIPAA can also be placed in the hub, and the spokes connected to it can make use of it instead of having to deploy it in each spoke individually.

Cloud metering

The governance vs. flexibility paradigm usually decides the placement of cloud metering, i.e. if the organization wants higher control over cloud costs, it should be in the central hub, whereas if it prioritizes innovation, the spokes should be allowed to control it. Regardless of the placement of the domain, the costs can be monitored from the central hub using cloud-native monitoring tools such as Azure Monitor or any third-party software deployed in the hub.

For ease of governance and since resources are usually shared at a project level, most cloud service providers suggest that an individual metering service be placed in the spokes. The centralized billing system of the organization, however, can make use of scale and reserved instances to drive down the costs that the spokes can take advantage of. For example, billing and access control resources are placed in the lower levels in GCP to enable users to set up projects and perform their tasks. These billing systems in the lower levels are then controlled by a centralized billing system to decide who pays for the resources provisioned.

Don't get stuck with your on-prem network design. Design for the cloud.

  1. Peering VPCs into a mesh design can be an easy way to get onto the cloud, but it should not be your networking strategy for the long run.
  2. Hub and spoke network design offers more benefits than any other network strategy to be adopted only when the need arises. Plan for the design early on and keep a strategy in place to deploy it as early as possible.
  3. Hybrid of mesh and hub and spoke will be very useful in connecting multiple large networks especially when they need to access the same resources without having to route the traffic over the internet.
  4. Governance vs. flexibility should be a key consideration when designing for hub and spoke to leverage the best out of your infrastructure.
  5. Distribute domains across the hub or spokes to leverage costs, security, data collection, and economies of scale, and to foster secure interactions between networks.

Cloud network design strategy

This is an image of the framework for developing a Cloud Network Design Strategy.

Bibliography

Borschel, Brett. "Azure Hub Spoke Virtual Network Design Best Practices." Acendri Solutions, 13 Jan. 2022. Web.
Singh, Garvit. "Amazon Virtual Private Cloud Connectivity Options." AWS, January 2018. Web.
"What Is the Hub and Spoke Information Sharing Model?" Cyware, 16 Aug. 2021. Web.
Youseff, Lamia. "Mesh and Hub-and-Spoke Networks on Azure." Microsoft, Dec. 2017. Web.

Beyond Survival

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}204|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: N/A
  • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
  • member rating average days saved: N/A
  • Parent Category Name: Big Data
  • Parent Category Link: /big-data
  • Consumer, customer, employee, and partner behavior has changed; new needs have arisen as a result of COVID-19. Entire business models had to be rethought and revised – in real time with no warning.
  • And worse, no one knows when (or even if) the pandemic will end. The world and the economy will continue to be highly uncertain, unpredictable, and vulnerable for some time.
  • Business leaders need to continue experimenting to stay in business, protect employees and supply chains, manage financial obligations, allay consumer and employee fears, rebuild confidence, and protect trust.
  • How do organizations know whether their new business tactics are working?

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • We can learn many lessons from those who have survived and are succeeding.
  • They have one thing in common though – they rely on data and analytics to help people think and know how to respond, evaluate effectiveness of new business tactics, uncover emerging trends to feed innovation, and minimize uncertainty and risk.
  • This mini-blueprint highlights organizations and use cases where data, analytics, and AI deliver tangible business and human value now and in the future.

Impact and Result

  • Learn from the pandemic survivors and super-achievers so that you too can hit the ground running in the new normal. Even better – go beyond survival, like many of them have done. Create your future by leveraging and scaling up your data and analytics investments. It is not (yet) too late, and Info-Tech can help.

Beyond Survival Research & Tools

Beyond Survival

Use data, analytics, and AI to reimagine the future and thrive in the new normal.

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

  • Beyond Survival Storyboard
[infographic]

GDPR, Implemented!

GDPR, Are You really ready?

It is now 2020 and the GDPR has been in effect for almost 2 years. Many companies thought: been there, done that. And for a while the regulators let some time go by.

The first warnings appeared quickly enough. Eg; in September 2018, the French regulator warned a company that they needed to get consent of their customers for getting geolocation based data.

That same month, an airline was hacked and, on top of the reputational damage and costs to fix the IT systems, it faced the threat of a stiff fine.

Even though we not have really noticed, fines started being imposed as early as January 2019.

But these fines, that is when you have material breaches...

Wrong! The fines are levied in a number of cases. And to make it difficult to estimate, there are guidelines that will shape the decision making process, but no hard and fast rules!

The GDPR is very complex and consists of both articles and associated recitals that you need to be in compliance with. it is amuch about the letter as it is about the spirit.

We have a clear view on what most of those cases are.
And more importantly, when you follow our guidelines, you will be well placed to answer any questions by your clients and cooperate with the regulator in a proactive way.

They will never come after me. I'm too small.

And besides, I have my privacy policy and cookie notice in place

Company size has nothing to do with it.

While in the beginning, it seemed mostly a game for the big players (for names, you have to contact us) that is just perception.

As early as March 2018 a €10M revenue company was fined around €120,000. 2 days later another company with operating revenues of  around €6.2M was fined close to €200.000 for failing to abide by the DSRR stipulatons.

Don't know what these are?
Fill out the form below and we'll let you in on the good stuff.

 

Continue reading

Dive Into Five Years of Security Strategies

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}247|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: N/A
  • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
  • member rating average days saved: N/A
  • Parent Category Name: Security Strategy & Budgeting
  • Parent Category Link: /security-strategy-and-budgeting
  • As organizations build their security programs, there is often the question of what are other companies doing.
  • Part of this is a desire to know whether challenges are unique to certain companies, but also to understand how people are tackling some of their security gaps.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

Don’t just wonder what others are doing – use this report to see how companies are faring in their current state, where they want to target in their future state, and the ways they’re planning to raise their security posture.

Impact and Result

  • Whether you’re building out your security program for the first time or are just interested in how others are faring, review insights from 66 security strategies in this report.
  • This research complements the blueprint, Build an Information Security Program, and can be used as a guide while completing that project.

Dive Into Five Years of Security Strategies Research & Tools

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Start here – read the Executive Brief

Read our concise Executive Brief to find out what this report contains.

[infographic]

Identify and Manage Operational Risk Impacts on Your Organization

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}230|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: N/A
  • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
  • member rating average days saved: N/A
  • Parent Category Name: Vendor Management
  • Parent Category Link: /vendor-management

More than any other time, our world is changing. As a result, organizations – and their vendors – need to be able to adapt their plans to accommodate risk on an unprecedented level.

A new threat will impact your organization's operations at some point. Make sure your plans are flexible enough to manage the inevitable consequences and that you understand where those threats may originate.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • Identifying and managing a vendor’s potential operational impact on your organization requires multiple people in the organization across several functions. Those people all need coaching on the potential changes in the market and how these changes may affect operations.
  • Organizational leadership is often taken unaware during crises, and their plans lack the flexibility to adjust to significant market upheavals.

Impact and Result

Vendor management practices educate organizations on the different potential risks from vendors in your market and suggest creative and alternative ways to avoid and help manage them.

  • Prioritize and classify your vendors with quantifiable, standardized rankings.
  • Prioritize focus on your high-risk vendors.
  • Standardize your processes for identifying and monitoring vendor risks to manage potential impacts with our Operational Risk Impact Tool.

Identify and Manage Operational Risk Impacts on Your Organization Research & Tools

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Identify and Manage Operational Risk Impacts to Your Organization Storyboard – Use this research to better understand the negative impacts of vendor actions to your brand reputation.

Use this research to identify and quantify the potential operational impacts caused by vendors. Utilize Info-Tech's approach to look at the operational impact from various perspectives to better prepare for issues that may arise.

  • Identify and Manage Operational Risk Impacts to Your Organization Storyboard

2. Operational Risk Impact Tool – Use this tool to help identify and quantify the operational impacts of negative vendor actions.

By playing the “what if” game and asking probing questions to draw out – or eliminate - possible negative outcomes, everyone involved adds their insight into parts of the organization to gather a comprehensive picture of potential impacts.

  • Operational Risk Impact Tool
[infographic]

Further reading

Identify and Manage Operational Risk Impacts on Your Organization

Understand internal and external vendor risks to avoid potential disaster.

Analyst perspective

Organizations need to be aware of the operational damage vendors may cause to plan around those impacts effectively.

Frank Sewell

Organizations must be mindful that operational risks come from internal and external vendor sources. Missing either component in the overall risk assessment can significantly impact day-to-day business processes that cost revenue, delay projects, and lead to customer dissatisfaction.

Frank Sewell,

Research Director, Vendor Management
Info-Tech Research Group

Executive Summary

Your Challenge

More than any other time, our world is changing rapidly. As a result, organizations – and their vendors – need to be able to adapt their plans to accommodate risk on an unprecedented level.

A new threat will impact your organization's operations at some point. Make sure your plans are flexible enough to manage the inevitable consequences and that you understand where those threats may originate.

Common Obstacles

Identifying and managing a vendor’s potential operational impact on your organization requires multiple people in the organization across several functions. Those people all need coaching on the potential changes in the market and how these changes may affect operations.

Organizational leadership is often taken unaware during crises, and their plans lack the flexibility to adjust to significant market upheavals.

Info-Tech's Approach

Vendor management practices educate organizations on the different potential risks from vendors in your market and suggest creative and alternative ways to avoid and help manage them.

Prioritize and classify your vendors with quantifiable, standardized rankings.

Prioritize focus on your high-risk vendors.

Standardize your processes for identifying and monitoring vendor risks to manage potential impacts with our Operational Risk Impact Tool.

Info-Tech Insight

Organizations must evolve their risk assessments to be more adaptive to respond to threats in the market. Ongoing monitoring of the vendors tied to company operations, and understanding where those vendors impact your operations, is imperative to avoiding disasters.

Info-Tech’s multi-blueprint series on vendor risk assessment

There are many individual components of vendor risk beyond cybersecurity.

There are many components to vendor risk, including: Financial, Reputational, Operational, Strategic, Security, Regulatory & Compliance.

This series will focus on the individual components of vendor risk and how vendor management practices can facilitate organizations’ understanding of those risks.

Out of Scope:
This series will not tackle risk governance, determining overall risk tolerance and appetite, or quantifying inherent risk.

Operational risk impacts

Potential losses to the organization due to incidents that affect operations.

  • In this blueprint we’ll explore operational risks, particularly from third-party vendors, and their impacts.
  • Identify potentially disruptive events to assess the overall impact on organizations and implement adaptive measures to identify, manage, and monitor vendor performance.
Operational

The world is constantly changing

The IT market is constantly reacting to global influences. By anticipating changes, leaders can set expectations and work with their vendors to accommodate them.

When the unexpected happens, being able to adapt quickly to new priorities ensures continued long-term business success.

Below are some things no one expected to happen in the last few years:

27%

Businesses are changing their internal processes around TPRM in response to the Pandemic.

70%

Of organizations attribute a third-party breach to too much privileged access.

85%

Of breaches involved human factors (phishing, poor passwords, etc.).

Assess internal and external operational risk impacts

Due diligence and consistent monitoring are the keys to safeguarding your organization.

Two sides of the Same Coin

Internal

  • Poorly vetted supplemental staff
  • Bad system configurations
  • Lack of relevant skills
  • Poor vendor performance
  • Failure to follow established processes
  • Weak contractual accountability
  • Unsupportable or end-of-life system components

External

  • Cyberattacks
  • Supply Chain Issues
  • Geopolitical Disruptions
  • Vendor Acquisitions
  • N-Party Non-Compliance
  • Vendor Fraud

Operational risk is the risk of losses caused by flawed or failed processes, policies, systems, or events that disrupt business operations.

- Wikipedia

Internal operational risk

Vendors operating within your secure perimeter can open your organization to substantial risk.

Frequently monitor your internal process around vendor management to ensure safe operations.

  • Poorly vetted supplemental staff
  • Bad system configurations
  • Lack of relevant skills
  • Poor vendor performance
  • Failure to follow established processes
  • Weak contractual accountability
  • Unsupportable or end-of-life system components

Info-Tech Insight

You may have solid policies, but if your employees and vendors are not following them, they will not protect the organization.

External operational risks

  • Cyberattacks
  • Supplier issues and geopolitical instability
  • Vendor acquisitions
  • N-party vendor non-compliance

Identify and manage operational risks

Poorly configured systems

Failing to ensure that your vendor-supported systems are properly configured and that your vendors are meeting your IT change control and configuration standards is more commonplace than expected. Proper oversight and management of your support vendors are crucial to ensure they are meeting expectations in this regard.

Failure to follow processes

Most companies have policies and procedures around IT change and configuration control, security standards, risk management, vendor performance standards, etc. While having these processes is a good start, failure to perform continuous monitoring and management of these leads to increased risks of incidents.

Supply chain disruptions

Awareness of the supply chain's complications, and each organization's dependencies, are increasing for everyone. However, most organizations still do not understand the chain of n-party vendors that support their specific vendors or how interruptions in their supply chains could affect them. The 2022 Toyota shutdown due to Kojima is a perfect example of how one essential parts vendor could shut down your operations.

What to look for

Identify operational risk impacts

  • Does the vendor have a business continuity plan they will share for your review?
  • Is the vendor operating on old hardware that may be out of warranty or at end of life?
  • Is the vendor operating on older software or shareware that may lack the necessary patches?
  • Does the vendor self-audit, or do they use a vetted third-party audit firm to issue a SOC report annually?
  • Does the vendor have sufficient personnel in acceptable regions to support your operations?
  • Is the vendor willing to make concessions on contractual protections, or are they only offering “one-sided” agreements with “as-is” warranties?

Operational risks

Not knowing where your risks come from creates additional risks to operations.

  • Supply chain disruptions and global shortages.
    • Geopolitical disruptions and natural disasters have caused unprecedented interruptions to business. Do you know where your critical vendors are getting their supplies? Are you aware of their business continuity plans to accommodate for those interruptions?
  • Poor vendor performance.
    • Organizations need to understand where vendors are acting in their operations and manage the impact of replacing that vendor and cutting their losses rather than continuing to throw good money away after a bad performance.
  • Vendor acquisitions.
    • A lot of acquisition is going on in the market today. Large companies are buying competitors, imposing new terms on customers, or removing competing products from the market. Understand your options if a vendor is acquired by a company with which you do not wish to be in a relationship.

It is important to identify where potential risks to your operations may come from to manage and potentially eliminate them from impacting your organization.

Info-Tech Insight

Most organizations realize that their vendors could operationally affect them if an incident occurs. Still, they fail to follow the chain of events that might arise from those incidents to understand the impact fully.

Prepare your vendor risk management for success

Due diligence will enable successful outcomes.

  1. Obtain top-level buy-in; it is critical to success.
  2. Build enterprise risk management (ERM) through incremental improvement.
  3. Focus initial efforts on the “big wins” to prove the process works.
  4. Use existing resources.
  5. Build on any risk management activities that already exist in the organization.
  6. Socialize ERM throughout the organization to gain additional buy‑in.
  7. Normalize the process long term with ongoing updates and continuing education for the organization.

How to assess third-party operational risk

  1. Review Organizational Operations

    Understand the organization’s operational risks to prepare for the “what if” game exercise.
  2. Identify and Understand Potential Operational Risks

    Play the “what if” game with the right people at the table.
  3. Create a Risk Profile Packet for Leadership

    Pull all the information together in a presentation document.
  4. Validate the Risks

    Work with leadership to ensure that the proposed risks are in line with their thoughts.
  5. Plan to Manage the Risks

    Lower the overall risk potential by putting mitigations in place.
  6. Communicate the Plan

    It is important not only to have a plan but also to socialize it in the organization for awareness.
  7. Enact the Plan

    Once the plan is finalized and socialized, put it in place with continued monitoring for success.

Insight summary

Operational risk impacts often come from unexpected places and have unforeseen impacts. Knowing where your vendors place in critical business processes and those vendors' business continuity plans concerning your organization should be a priority for those who manage the vendors.

Insight 1

Organizations fail to plan for vendor acquisitions appropriately.

Vendors routinely get acquired in the IT space. Does your organization have appropriate safeguards from inadvertently entering a negative relationship? Do you have plans around replacing critical vendors purchased in such a manner?

Insight 2

Organizations often fail to understand how they factor into a vendor’s business continuity plan.

If one of your critical vendors goes down, do you know how they intend to re-establish business? Do you know how you factor into their priorities?

Insight 3

Organizations need to have a comprehensive understanding of how their vendor-managed systems integrate with Operations.

Do you understand where in the business processes vendor-supported systems lie? Do you have contingencies around disruptions that account for those pieces missing from the process?

Identifying operational vendor risk

Who should be included in the discussion

  • While it is true that executive-level leadership defines the strategy for an organization, it is vital for those making decisions to make informed decisions.
  • Getting input from operational experts at your organization will enhance your organization's long-term potential for success.
  • Involving those who not only directly manage vendors but also understand your business processes will aid in determining the forward path for relationships with your current vendors and identifying new emerging potential partners.

See the blueprint Build an IT Risk Management Program

Review your operational plans for new risks on a regular basis.

Keep in mind Risk = Likelihood x Impact (R=L*I).

Impact (I) tends to remain the same, while Likelihood (L) is becoming closer to 100% as threat actors become more prevalent

Managing vendor operational risk impacts

What can we realistically do about the risks?

  • Review vendors’ business continuity plans and disaster recovery testing.
    • Understand your priority in their plans.
  • Institute proper contract lifecycle management.
    • Make sure to follow corporate due diligence and risk assessment policies and procedures.
    • Failure to do so consistently can be a recipe for disaster.
  • Develop IT governance and change control.
  • Introduce continual risk assessment to monitor the relevant vendor markets.
    • Regularly review your operational plans for new risks and evolving likelihoods.
    • Risk = Likelihood x Impact (R=L*I).
      • Impact (I) tends to remain the same and be well understood, while Likelihood (L) may often be considered 100%.
  • Be adaptable and allow for innovations that arise from the current needs.
    • Capture lessons learned from prior incidents to improve over time and adjust your plans accordingly.

Organizations need to review their organizational risk plans, considering the placement of vendors in their operations.

Pandemics, extreme weather, and wars that affect global supply chains are current realities, not unlikely scenarios.

Ongoing improvement

Incorporating lessons learned

  • Over time, despite everyone’s best observations and plans, incidents will catch us off guard.
  • When it happens, follow your incident response plans and act accordingly.
  • An essential step is to document what worked and what did not – collectively known as the “lessons learned.”
  • Use the lessons learned document to devise, incorporate, and enact a better risk management process.

Sometimes disasters occur despite our best plans to manage them.

When this happens, it is important to document the lessons learned and improve our plans going forward.

The "what if" game

1-3 hours

Vendor management professionals are in an excellent position to help senior leadership identify and pull together resources across the organization to determine potential risks. By playing the "what if" game and asking probing questions to draw out – or eliminate – possible adverse outcomes, everyone involved adds their insight into parts of the organization to gather a comprehensive picture of potential impacts.

  • Break into smaller groups (or if too small, continue as a single group).
  • Use the Operational Risk Impact Tool to prompt discussion on potential risks. Keep this discussion flowing organically to explore all potentials but manage the overall process to keep the discussion pertinent and on track.
  • Collect the outputs and ask the subject matter experts (SMEs) for management options for each one in order to present a comprehensive risk strategy. You will use this to educate senior leadership so that they can make an informed decision to accept or reject the solution.

Download the Operational Risk Impact Tool

Input

  • List of identified potential risk scenarios scored by likelihood and operational impact
  • List of potential management of the scenarios to reduce the risk

Output

  • Comprehensive operational risk profile on the specific vendor solution

Materials

  • Whiteboard/flip charts
  • Operational Risk Impact Tool to help drive discussion

Participants

  • Vendor Management – Coordinator
  • Organizational Leadership
  • Operations Experts (SMEs)
  • Legal/Compliance/Risk Manager

High risk example from tool

Sample Questions to Ask to Identify Impacts. Lists questions impact score, weight, question and comments or notes.

Being overly reliant on a single talented individual can impose risk to your operations. Make sure you include resiliency in your skill sets for critical business practices.

Impact score and level. Each score for impacts are unique to the organization.

Low risk example from tool

Sample Questions to Ask to Identify Impacts. Lists questions impact score, weight, question and comments or notes. Impact score and level. Each score for impacts are unique to the organization.

Summary

Seek to understand all aspects of your operations.

  • Organizations need to understand and map out where vendors are critical to their operations.
  • Those organizations that consistently follow their established risk assessment and due diligence processes will be better positioned to avoid disasters.
  • Bring the right people to the table to outline potential risks in the market and your organization.
  • Understand how your vendors prioritize your organization in their business continuity processes.
  • Incorporate “lessons learned” from prior incidents into your risk management process to build better plans for future issues.

Organizations must evolve their operational risk assessments considering their vendor portfolio.

Ongoing monitoring of the market and the vendors tied to company operations is imperative to avoiding disaster.

Related Info-Tech Research

Identify and Manage Financial Risk Impacts on Your Organization

  • Vendor management practices educate organizations on the different potential financial impacts that vendors may incur and suggest systems to help manage them.
  • Standardize your processes for identifying and monitoring vendor risks to manage financial impacts with our Financial Risk Impact Tool.

Identify and Manage Reputational Risk Impacts on Your Organization

  • Vendor management practices educate organizations on the different potential risks to vendors in your market and suggest creative and alternative ways to avoid and help manage them.
  • Standardize your processes for identifying and monitoring vendor risks to manage potential impacts on your reputation and brand with our Reputational Risk Impact Tool.

Identify and Manage Strategic Risk Impacts on Your Organization

  • Vendor management practices educate organizations on the different potential risks to vendors in your market and suggest creative and alternative ways to avoid and help manage them.
  • Standardize your processes for identifying and monitoring vendor risks to manage potential impacts on your strategic plan with our Strategic Risk Impact Tool.

Bibliography

“Weak Cybersecurity is taking a toll on Small Businesses.” Tripwire. August 7, 2022.

SecureLink 2022 White Paper SL_Page_EA+PAM (rocketcdn.me)

Member Poll March 2021 "Guide: Evolving Work Environments Impact of Covid-19 on Profile and Management of Third Parties.“ Shared Assessments. March 2021.

“Operational Risk.” Wikipedia.

Tonello, Matteo. “Strategic Risk Management: A Primer for Directors.” Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, August 23, 2012.

Frigo, Mark L., and Richard J. Anderson. “Embracing Enterprise Risk Management: Practical Approaches for Getting Started.” COSO, 2011.

Select an Enterprise Application

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}588|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
  • member rating average dollars saved: $10,000 Average $ Saved
  • member rating average days saved: 10 Average Days Saved
  • Parent Category Name: Enterprise Applications
  • Parent Category Link: /enterprise-applications
  • Organizations rarely have both the sufficient knowledge and resources to properly evaluate, select, and implement an enterprise application software (EAS), forcing them to turn to external partnerships.
  • Inadequate and incomplete requirements skew the EAS selection in one direction or another. Many EAS projects fail due to a lack of clear description and specification of functional requirements.
  • The EAS technology market is so vast that it becomes nearly impossible to know where to start or how to differentiate between vendors and products.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • Accountability for EAS success is shared between IT and the business. There is no single owner of an EAS. A unified approach to building your strategy promotes an integrated roadmap so all stakeholders have clear direction on the future state.
  • While technology is the key enabler of building strong customer experiences, there are many other drivers of dissatisfaction. IT must stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the business to develop a technology framework for enterprise applications.
  • EAS projects are more successful when the management team understands the strategic importance and the criticality of alignment. Time needs to be spent upfront aligning business strategies with EAS capabilities. Effective alignment between IT and the business should happen daily. Alignment doesn’t just occur at the executive level but at each level of the organization.

Impact and Result

  • Conduct an EAS project preparedness assessment as a means to ensure you maximize the value of your time, effort, and spending.
  • Gather the necessary resources to form the team to conduct the EAS selection.
  • Gett the proper EAS requirement landscape by mapping out business capabilities and processes, translating into prioritized EAS requirements.
  • Review SoftwareReviews vendor reports to shortlist vendors for your RFP process.
  • Use Info-Tech’s templates and tools to gather your EAS requirements, build your RFP and evaluation scorecard, and build a foundational EAS selection framework.

Select an Enterprise Application Research & Tools

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Select an Enterprise Application Software Storyboard - A blueprint which prepares you for a proper and better enterprise application selection outcome.

Properly selecting and implementing an enterprise application requires a proper structure. This blueprint guides you with a framework to help in such project, including steps such as assessing readiness, plan for the right resources, requirements gathering, shortlisting, obtaining and evaluating vendor responses, and preparing for implementation.

  • Select an Enterprise Application Software Storyboard

2. Select an Enterprise Application Readiness Assessment Checklist – a checklist to assess your readiness towards moving ahead with the selection process.

The EAS Readiness Checklist includes a list of essential tasks to be completed prior to the enterprise application selection and implementation project.

  • EAS Readiness Assessment Checklist

3. ERP/HRIS/CRM Requirements Templates – a set of templates to help build a list of requirements and features for the selection process.

These templates are specific to either ERP, HRIS, or CRM. Each template lists out a set of modules and features allowing you to easily build your requirements.

  • ERP Requirements Template
  • HRIS Requirements Template
  • CRM Requirements Template

4. Vendor Solicitation (RFP) to Evaluation Suite of Tools – Use Info-Tech’s RFP, vendor response and evaluation tools and templates to increase your efficiency in your RFP and evaluation process.

Configure this time-saving suite of tools to your organizational culture, needs, and most importantly the desired outcome of your RFP initiative.

  • EAS Request for Proposal Template
  • EAS Vendor Response Template
  • ERP Vendor Demonstration Script Template
  • HRIS Vendor Demonstration Script Template
  • CRM Vendor Demonstration Script Template
  • EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool
[infographic]

Workshop: Select an Enterprise Application

Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

1 Workshop debrief – Prepare for implementation

The Purpose

Review evaluation framework.

Prepare for implementation.

Key Benefits Achieved

Activities

1.1 Support the project team in establishing the evaluation framework.

1.2 Discuss demo scripts scenarios.

1.3 Discuss next steps and key items in preparation for the implementation.

Outputs

Evaluation framework considerations.

Demo script considerations.

RFP considerations.

2 Workshop Preparation

The Purpose

The facilitator works with the team to verify organizational readiness for EAS project and form the EAS project team.

Key Benefits Achieved

Level-set on organizational readiness for EAS

Organizational project alignment

Activities

2.1 Introduce the workshop and complete an overview of activities.

2.2 Complete organizational context assessment to level-set understanding.

2.3 Complete EAS readiness assessment.

2.4 Form EAS selection team.

Outputs

EAS readiness assessment

Structured EAS selection team

3 Mapping Capabilities to Prioritizing Requirements

The Purpose

Determine the business capabilities and process impacted by the EAS.

Determine what the business needs to get out of the EAS solution.

Build the selection roadmap and project plan.

Key Benefits Achieved

Business and ERP solution alignment

Activities

3.1 Map business capabilities/processes.

3.2 Inventory application and data flow.

3.3 List EAS requirements.

3.4 Prioritize EAS requirements.

Outputs

Business capability/process map

List or map of application + data flow

Prioritized EAS requirements

4 Vendor Landscape and your RFP

The Purpose

Understand EAS market product offerings.

Readying key RFP aspects and expected vendor responses.

Key Benefits Achieved

Shortlist of vendors to elicit RFP response.

Translated EAS requirements into RFP.

Activities

4.1 Build RFP.

4.2 Build vendor response template.

Outputs

Draft of RFP template.

Draft of vendor response template.

5 How to Evaluate Vendors

The Purpose

Prepare for demonstration and evaluation.

Establish evaluation criteria.

Key Benefits Achieved

Narrow your options for ERP selection to best-fit vendors.

Activities

5.1 Run an RFP evaluation simulation.

5.2 Establish evaluation criteria.

5.3 Customize the RFP and Demonstration and Scoring Tool.

Outputs

Draft of demo script template.

Draft of evaluation criteria.

Draft of RFP and Demonstration and Scoring Tool.

Further reading

Select an Enterprise Application

Selecting a best-fit solution requires balancing needs, cost, and vendor capability.

Analyst Perspective

A foundational EAS strategy is critical to decision-making.

Enterprise application software (EAS) is a core tool that a business leverages to accomplish its goals. An EAS that is doing its job well is invisible to the business. The challenges come when the tool is no longer invisible. It has become a source of friction in the functioning of the business.

EAS systems are expensive, their benefits are difficult to quantify, and they often suffer from poor user satisfaction. Post-implementation, technology evolves, organizational goals change, and the health of the system is not monitored. This is complicated in today’s digital landscape with multiple integration points, siloed data, and competing priorities.

Too often organizations jump into selecting replacement systems without understanding the needs of the organization. Alignment between business and IT is just one part of the overall strategy. Identifying key pain points and opportunities, assessed in the light of organizational strategy, will provide a strong foundation to the transformation of the EAS system. Learning about different vendor product offerings with a rigorous approach and evaluation framework will pave way for a better selection outcome.

Hong Kwok, Research Director

Hong Kwok
Research Director
Info-Tech Research Group

Executive Summary

Your Challenge Common Obstacles Info-Tech’s Approach
Selecting and implementing an EAS is one of the most expensive and time-consuming technology transformations an organization can undertake. EAS projects are notorious for time and budget overruns, with only a margin of the anticipated benefits being realized. Making the wrong technology selection or failing to plan for an EAS implementation has significant – and possibly career-ending – implications.

The EAS technology market is so vast that it is nearly impossible to know where to start or how to differentiate between vendors and products.

Inadequate and incomplete requirements skew the EAS selection in one direction to another. Many EAS projects fail due to a lack of clear description and specification of functional requirements.

Organizations rarely have both the sufficient knowledge and resources to properly evaluate, select, and implement an EAS, forcing them to turn to external partnerships.

EAS selection must be driven by your organization’s overall strategy. Ensure you are ready to embark on this journey with the right resources.

Determine what EAS solution fits your organization through a structured requirement gathering process to a vendor evaluation framework.

Ensure strong points of integration between EAS and other software such as ERP to HRIS. No EAS should live in isolation.

Info-Tech Insight
Accountability for EAS success is shared between IT and the business. There is no single owner of an EAS. A unified approach to building your strategy promotes an integrated roadmap so all stakeholders have clear direction on the future state.

You are not just picking a piece of software, you are choosing a long-term technology partner

Reasons for Selectin Chosen Software

Decision making in selection often stands on functional fit; don’t forget to consider vendor fit.

As the ERP technology market becomes increasingly saturated and difficult to decode, vendors are trying to get ahead by focusing on building a partnership, not just making a sale.

68 % of organizations are satisfied with the overall ERP vendor experience, up from 54% in 2017.

Panorama Consulting Solutions, “Report,” 2018

What is an Enterprise Application?

Our Definition: Enterprise Application Software (EAS) is a large software system that provides a broad and integrated set of features which supports a range of business operations and processes across an organization. The system is broadly deployed, provides a unified interface and data structure, allowing for higher business productivity and reporting efficiencies. Best known EAS solutions include Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Human Resource Information System (HRIS), and Customer Relationship Management (CRM).

More focused EAS solutions may also bring benefits to your organization, depending on the scale of operations, complexity of operations, and functions. Here are some examples:

PSA: Professional Services Automation
SCMS: Supply Chain Management System
WMS: Warehouse Management System
EAM: Enterprise Asset Management
PIMS: Product Information Management System
MES: Manufacturing Execution System
MA: Marketing Automation

Our other Selection Framework

When selecting personal or commodity applications, or mid-tier applications with spend below $100,000, use our Rapid Application Selection Framework.

Download this tool

Enterprise Applications Lifecycle Advisory Services

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)

What is EPR

Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems facilitate the flow of information across business units. They allow for the seamless integration of systems and create a holistic view of the enterprise to support decision making.

In many organizations, the ERP system is considered the lifeblood of the enterprise. Problems with this key operational system will have a dramatic impact on the ability of the enterprise to survive and grow.

An ERP system:

  • Automates processes, reducing the amount of manual, routine work.
  • Integrates with core modules, eliminating the fragmentation of systems.
  • Centralizes information for reporting from multiple parts of the value chain to a single point.
ERP use cases: Product-centric
Suitable for organizations that manufacture, assemble, distribute, or manage material goods.
Service-centric
Suitable for organizations that provide and manage field services and/or professional services.

Human Resource Information System (HRIS)

What is HRIS?

An HRIS is used to acquire, store, manipulate, analyze, retrieve, and distribute information regarding an organization’s human resources. HRIS covers the entire employee lifecycle from recruit to retire.

An HRIS:

  • Retains employee data in a single repository.
  • Enhances employee engagement through self-service and visibility into their records.
  • Enhances data security through role-based access control.
  • Eliminates manual processes and enables workflow automation.
  • Reduces transaction processing time and HR administrative tasks.
  • Presents an end-to-end, comprehensive view of all HR processes.
  • Reduces exposure to risk with compliance to rules and regulations.
  • Enhances the business’s reporting capability on various aspects of human capital.

Human Resource Information System

Customer relationship management (CRM)

What is CRM?

A CRM platform (or suite) is a core enterprise application that provides a broad feature set for supporting customer interaction processes, typically across marketing, sales and customer service. These suites supplant more basic applications for customer interaction management (such as the contact management module of an ERP or office productivity suite).

A CRM suite provides many key capabilities, including but not limited to:

  • Account management
  • Order history tracking
  • Pipeline management
  • Case management
  • Campaign management
  • Reports and analytics
  • Customer journey execution

A CRM provides a host of native capabilities, but many organizations elect to tightly integrate their CRM solution with other parts of their customer experience ecosystem to provide a 360-degree view of their customers.

Customer relationship management

The good EAS numbers

There are many good reasons to support EAS implementation and use.

92% of organizations report that CRM use is important for accomplishing revenue objectives.
Source: Validity, 2020

Almost 26% of companies implement HRIS is to obtain greater functionalities, while other main reasons are to increase efficiencies, support growth, and consolidate systems.
Source: SoftwarePath, 2022

Functionality of an ERP is believed to be the most important aspect by almost 40% of companies.
Source: SelectHub, 2022

The ugly EAS numbers

Risks are high in EAS projects.

Statistical analysis of ERP projects indicates rates of failure vary from 50 to 70 percent. Taking the low end of those analyst reports, one in two ERP projects is considered a failure.
Source: Electric Journal of Information Systems Evaluation.

46% of HR technology projects exceed their planned timelines.
Source: Unleash, 2020

Almost 70% of all CRM implementation projects do not meet expected objectives.
Source: Future Computing and Informatics Journal

Enterprise Application dissatisfaction

Finance, IT, Sales, HR, and other users of the Enterprise Application system can only optimize with the full support of each other. Cooperation between departments is crucial when trying to improve the technology capabilities and customer interaction.

Drivers of Dissatisfaction
Business Data People and teams Technology
  • Misaligned objectives
  • Product fit
  • Changing priorities
  • Lack of metrics
  • Access to data
  • Data hygiene
  • Data literacy
  • One view of the customer
  • User adoption
  • Lack of IT support
  • Training (use of data and system)
  • Vendor relations
  • Systems integration
  • Multi-channel complexity
  • Capability shortfall
  • Lack of product support

Info-Tech Insight
While technology is the key enabler of building strong customer experiences, there are many other drivers of dissatisfaction. IT must stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the business to develop a technology framework for Enterprise Applications.

Case Study

Align strategy and technology to meet consumer demand.

NETFLIX

INDUSTRY
Entertainment

SOURCE
Forbes, 2017

Challenge
Beginning as a mail-out service, Netflix offered subscribers a catalog of videos to select from and have mailed to them directly. Customers no longer had to go to a retail store to rent a video. However, the lack of immediacy of direct mail as the distribution channel resulted in slow adoption.

Blockbuster was the industry leader in video retail but was lagging in its response to industry, consumer, and technology trends around customer experience.

Solution
In response to the increasing presence of tech-savvy consumers on the internet, Netflix invested in developing an online platform as its primary distribution channel. The benefit of doing so was two-fold: passive brand advertising (by being present on the internet) and meeting customer demands for immediacy and convenience. Netflix also recognized the rising demand for personalized service and created an unprecedented, tailored customer experience.

Results
Netflix’s disruptive innovation is built on the foundation of great customer experience management. Netflix is now a $28 billion company, which is ten times what Blockbuster was worth.

Netflix used disruptive technologies to innovatively build a customer experience that put it ahead of the long-time video rental industry leader, Blockbuster.

Info-Tech’s methodology for selecting an Enterprise Application

1. Build alignment and assemble the team 2. Define your EAS 3. Engage, evaluate, and select 4. Next steps
Phase steps
  1. Aligning business and IT
  2. Readiness and resourcing
  1. Map capabilities
  2. List Requirements
  3. Prioritize requirements
  1. Know the products
  2. Engage the vendors
  3. Select properly
  1. Plan for implementation
Phase outcomes Discuss organizational goals and how to advance those using the EA system. Identify gaps and remediation steps in preparation of the selection. Assemble the EA selection team. List and review business capabilities and translate into EAS requirements. Prioritize requirements for selection. Gain an understanding of the product offerings on the market. Engage the vendors through RFPs and conduct a proper evaluation with an objective evaluation criteria and framework. Review and discuss the different elements required in preparation for the implementation project.

Blueprint deliverables

Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

ERP/HRIS/CRM Requirements Template

ERP Requirements Template

Accelerate your requirement gathering with a pre-compiled list of common requirements.

RFx Demo Scoring Tool

RFx Demo Scoring Tool

Quickly compare the vendors who respond to the RFx to identify the best fit for your needs.

Key deliverable:

RFx templates

Use one of our templates to build a ready-for-distribution implementation partner RFx tailored to the unique success factors of your implementation.

Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

DIY Toolkit Guided Implementation Workshop Consulting
"Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to his the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

Diagnostics and consistent frameworks are used throughout all four options

Guided Implementation

A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

A typical GI is between six to ten calls over the course of four to six months.

What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4

Call #1: Scoping call to understand the current situation.

Call #2: Discuss readiness and resourcing needs.

Call #3: Discuss the capabilities and application inventory.

Call #4: Discuss requirement gathering and prioritization.

Call #5: Go over SoftwareReviews and review draft RFx.

Call #6: Discuss evaluation tool and evaluation process.

Call #7: Discuss preparation for implementation.

Workshop Overview

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
Activities

Organizational Strategic Needs

1.1 Review the business context.

1.2 Overview of the EAS Landscape

1.2 Assess EAS project readiness

1.3 Determine the members of the EAS selection team

From Capabilities to Requirements

2.1 Map business capabilities

2.2 Inventory application and interactions

2.3 Gather requirements

2.4 Prioritize requirements

Vendor Landscape and Your RFP

3.1 Understanding product offerings

3.2 Build a list of targeted vendors

3.3 Build RFP

3.4 Build vendor response template

How to Evaluate Vendors

4.1 Run a RFP evaluation simulation

4.2 Build demo script

4.3 Establish evaluation criteria

Next Steps and Wrap-Up (offsite)

5.1 Clean up in-progress deliverables from previous four days.

5.2 Set up review time for workshop deliverables and to discuss next steps.

Deliverables
  1. EAS Readiness Checklist and remediation plan
  2. List of members in EAS selection team
  1. List of key business processes
  2. Inventory application and data flow map
  3. Prioritized EAS requirements
  1. Draft RFP template
  2. Draft vendor response template
  1. Draft demo script template
  2. Draft vendor evaluation tool
  1. Completed RFP template
  2. Completed vendor response template
  3. Completed demo script template
  4. Vendor evaluation plan

Contact your account representative for more information.
workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

Phase 1

Build alignment and assemble the Team

Phase 1
1.1 Enterprise Application Landscape
1.2 Validate Readiness
1.3 Determine Resourcing

Phase 2
1.1 Capability Mapping
1.2 Requirements Gathering Data Mapping
1.3 Requirements Prioritizing

Phase 3
3.1 Understanding Product Offerings
3.2 RFP & Demo Scripts
3.3 Evaluation
Select and Negotiate

Phase 4
4.1 Prepare for Implementation

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

Gain an understanding of recent EAS technology.

Validate readiness before starting EAS selection.

Assemble EAS selection team through identification of key players.

This phase involves the following participants:

Key stakeholders from the various areas of the business that will support the project, including:

  • CxO (e.g. CIO, CFO)
  • Departmental leaders
  • Project management team
  • Subject matter experts

Select an Enterprise Application

Create a compelling case that addresses strategic business objectives

When someone at the organization asks you WHY, you need to deliver a compelling case. The ERP project will receive pushback, doubt, and resistance; if you can’t answer the question WHY, you will be left back-peddling.

When faced with a challenge, prepare for the WHY.

  • Why do we need this?
  • Why are we spending all this money?
  • Why are we bothering?
  • Why is this important?
  • Why did we do it this way?
  • Why did we choose this vendor?

Most organizations can answer “What?”

Some organizations can answer “How?”

Very few organizations have an answer for “Why?”

Each stage of the project will be difficult and present its own unique challenges and failure points. Re-evaluate if you lose sight of WHY at any stage in the project.

Ensure you have completed the necessary prerequisites for EAS selection

Prior to embarking on selection, ensure you have set the right building blocks and completed the necessary prerequisites: your strategy and roadmap, and business case.

STRATEGY & ROADMAP
Whatever EAS is required, take the time to align your strategy and roadmap to business priorities. Right-size a technology strategy by assessing deployment model alternatives and future-state options with your EAS vision, operating model, and current-state assessment as inputs. Put your strategy to action with a living roadmap by following Info-Tech’s blueprint, Develop an Actionable Strategy and Roadmap.

EAS BUSINESS CASE
Use a business case to justify the business need for your EAS project and secure funding for moving forward with the proposal. A business case will further provide executive decision makers with the tools to compare and prioritize initiatives. Drive a consistent approach to promoting successful initiatives and holding the organization accountable to the projected benefits with Info-Tech’s blueprint, Reduce Time to Consensus With an Accelerated Business Case.

Align the EAS strategy with the corporate strategy

Corporate strategy Unified strategy EAS strategy
  • Conveys the current state of the organization and the path it wants to take.
  • Identifies future goals and business aspirations.
  • Communicates the initiatives that are critical for getting the organization from its current state to the future state.
  • EAS optimization can be and should be linked, with metrics, to the corporate strategy and ultimate business objectives.
  • Communicates the organization’s budget and spending on EAS.
  • Identifies IT initiatives that will support the business and key EAS objectives.
  • Outlines staffing and resourcing for EAS initiatives.

Info-Tech Insight
EAS projects are more successful when the management team understands the strategic importance and the criticality of alignment. Time needs to be spent upfront aligning business strategies with EAS capabilities. Effective alignment between IT and the business should happen daily. Alignment doesn’t just to occur at the executive level alone, but at each level of the organization.

Understand how EAS fits into your wider IT organization

Identify the IT drivers and opportunities to take advantage of when embarking on your EAS project.

Greenfield or brownfield: Do you currently have an EAS? Do you have multiple EASs? What is the history of your EAS deployment? How customized is it?

End of life: What lifecycle stage is it in?

Utilization: Are there point solutions in your application portfolio that support some EAS capabilities? Is functionality duplicated and/or underutilized?

Reason for change: What are your organizational drivers for this EAS project (e.g. acquisition/merger)?

APPLICATION PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

Business leaders need application managers to do more than support business operations. Applications must drive business growth, and application managers need their portfolios to be current and effective and to evolve continuously to support the business or risk being marginalized. Rationalize your applications with a roadmap that propels the business forward.

Go to this link

Before switching vendors, evaluate your existing EAS to see if it’s being underutilized or could use an upgrade

The cost of switching vendors can be challenging, but it will depend entirely on the quality of data and whether it makes sense to keep it.

  • Achieving success when switching vendors first requires reflection. We need to ask why we are dissatisfied with our incumbent software.
  • If the product is old and inflexible, the answer may be obvious, but don’t be afraid to include your incumbent in your evaluation if your issues might be solved with an upgrade.
  • Look at your use-case requirements to see where you want to take the EAS solution and compare them to your incumbent’s roadmap. If they don’t match, switching vendors may be the only solution. If your roadmaps align, see if you’re fully leveraging the solution or will be able to start working through process improvements

Fully leveraging your current software now will have two benefits:

1 It may turn out that poor leveraging of your incumbent software was the problem all along; switching vendors won’t solve the problem by itself. As the data to the right shows, a fifth of SMEs and a quarter of large enterprises do not fully leverage their incumbent software.
2 If you still decide to switch, you’ll be in a good negotiating position. If vendors can see you are engaged and fully leveraging your software, they will be less complacent during negotiations to win you over.
20%
Small/Medium
Enterprises
25%
Large
Enterprises
only occasionally or rarely/never use their software

Source: SoftwareReviews, 2020; N=45,027

Info-Tech Insight
Switching vendors won’t improve poor internal processes. To be fully successful and meet the goals of the business case, new software implementations must be accompanied by process review and improvement.

Familiarize yourself with the EAS market

How it got here Where it’s going
  • Acquisition and consolidation: The major vendors in the industry have grown over time through acquisition, particularly focusing on expanding products in industrial verticals.
  • Product stack: What it means is having to navigate complexity related to the product stack when thinking about EAS, which turns the conversation from EAS as a single product to EAS as a package of multiple products.
  • Modularity and interoperability: The benefit of the stack is that it often means modularity and the ability to implement parts of a solution or in an order that aligns to the customer’s needs. On the other hand, the stack is not always understood by or well communicated to the customer, and the interdependence of components often means they must be licensed together.
  • Customizable cloud: Software-as-a-Service in multitenant environments offers a hands-off value proposition, but increasingly customers are looking to customize their instances beyond the capability offered through configurability.
  • Best-of-breed consolidation: EAS vendors are continuing to consolidate functionality to increase interoperability and increase ease of integration. The market is rife with acquisitions and mergers, making the strong players even stronger.
  • Client experience: While most vendors now offer products that will meet the wide gamut of EAS business requirements, vendors are now paying extra attention to the client experience from partnership perspective.

Info-Tech Insight
Evaluating the EAS vendor landscape is becoming increasingly difficult as the playing field evens out in terms of functionality offerings. As such, it is becoming increasingly important to more meticulously evaluate vendors themselves as part of the selection process. This is especially important in EAS projects, as they tend to be multi-year in nature and result in long-term vendor partnerships.

What types of Enterprise solutions are at my disposal?

IT leaders typically compare EAS on-premises with SaaS options, but there are actually four different deployment scenarios.

1. On Premises 3. Proprietary Cloud 4. White-Label Cloud 2. SaaS
  • The traditional model for EAS deployment.
  • Upfront licensing term plus annual maintenance/ support fee.
  • Requires local server, database, and authentication.
  • Good support for industry modules.
  • Customizable.
  • EAS vendor hosts an instance of the EAS system in its own data center.
  • Patches may or may not be applied automatically.
  • Monthly per-user or traditional billing.
  • Otherwise, as with on premises.
  • EAS VAR or reseller hosts an instance of the EAS system in its own data center or in a public IaaS provider’s (e.g. Rackspace, Amazon EC2).
  • Otherwise, as with proprietary cloud.
  • Common model for cloud EAS.
  • All users share a single instance.
  • Patches and updates are applied automatically.
  • Monthly per-user fee.
  • Poor industry support.
  • Configurable but not customizable.

Info-Tech Insight
Cloud may apply in other ways to the EAS implementation. Most vendors offer particular EAS services delivered via the cloud. For example, some vendors offers CRM, project management, and payroll self-service as cloud-based options to augment on-premises ERP solutions.

Know when to adopt and when to bypass cloud EAS

Use the following guidelines to determine if your organization will benefit from the cloud, or if you should stick to a more traditional delivery model.

Adopt a cloud-based EAS platform if you have: Do not adopt a cloud-based EAS platform if you have:
Standard processes – Businesses that have standard, repeatable processes can benefit greatly from the cost savings that cloud provides, as the need for expensive customizations is greatly minimized. Highly regulated industry – Although there is no hard evidence that says cloud-based solutions are not able to support security or compliance needs, in certain industries such as banking or insurance, cloud is not the norm and may be a tough sell for IT.
Lean IT operations – Organizations with lean IT or no formal IT departments supporting them will find SaaS EAS particularly appealing. Those with IT that can support day-to-day operations but are not prepared for disaster recovery should also consider cloud EAS, either hosted or SaaS-based. Unreliable network – If the business regularly faces network outages or remote employees have unreliable internet connections, a cloud-based solution may not be the best option. IT would face many complaints from disgruntled workers unable to access data.
Mobile workforce – Telecommuting is becoming more common, as is the requirement for data to be readily available for those on the road. Using cloud is a good way to provide this functionality. Unsavvy workforce – Organizations that prefer to be late adopters of technology may face strong resistance to taking their software to the cloud. Some employees may not like the idea of using a browser to connect to the system.

Info-Tech Insight
Knowing when to choose a cloud EAS deployment comes down to two main factors: knowing the level of complexity required by the business, and knowing the available IT resources that can be dedicated to support and manage EAS.

Consider 3 classic scenarios when evaluating cloud EAS

Cloud EAS should be considered by all organizations, but these scenarios present the strongest opportunity.

The Startup The Spinoff The Modernizer
  • There is no greenfield in ERP, but if you’re a startup, you’re quite close.
  • Given the virtually nonexistent IT department in startups, having an on-premises ERP can be daunting. A SaaS delivery model is usually the best choice in these scenarios. Even if the resources are available, they are better spent driving business growth.
  • Startups typically have less stringent industry requirements, making SaaS a more attractive option.
  • Though not entirely new companies, spinoffs or subsidiaries often have needs similar to those of startups but with an added integration requirement.
  • When it comes to ERP, the deployment type will depend on how resources are split with the parent company. If there is little to no IT support, then SaaS is ideal.
  • If the parent company is already using cloud ERP, whether SaaS, hosted, or an internal cloud, then it is often easy for the spinoff to gain access as well.
  • Companies with legacy systems that are not salvageable, or out-of-date point solutions that do not scale, have the opportunity to start from scratch.
  • Those looking at reducing capital expenses should consider SaaS and hosted ERP deployments.
  • Those looking at having state-of-the-art technology in-house should consider building an internal private cloud that supports their ERP deployment.

Make sure you are ready to proceed with selection

Organizational readiness is essential for maximizing the benefits realized from your ERP. Cover all critical elements of pre-work, resources, buy-in, and strategy and planning before embarking on ERP selection and/or implementation.

Pre-work
Current State Understanding
Business Process Improvement
Future State Vision

Resources
Project Team
Governance Structures
Third-Party Partners
Cost and Budget

Buy-in
Goals and Objectives
Exec Business Sponsorship
Stakeholder Engagement
Change Management

STRATEGY and PLANNING
ERP Strategy & Roadmap
Risk Management
Project Metrics

Without a preparedness assessment, organizations end up wasting a lot of time on resolving gaps in planning that could have been mitigated upfront, which ultimately makes the implementation project more challenging.
– Suanne McGrath-Kelly, President & Principal Consultant, Plan in Motion Inc., interviewed by Info-Tech, 2019.

Assess your EAS readiness before moving forward

To avoid common project pitfalls, complete the necessary prerequisites before proceeding with EAS. Consider whether the risks of proceeding unprepared fall within your organization’s risk tolerance. If they do not, pivot back to strategy.

Preceding tasks Risks of proceeding unprepared
Project Vision
Project Scope
EAS Business Case
Current State Map
Improvement Opportunity Analysis
Future State Considerations
Strategic Requirements
Project Metrics and Benchmarks
Risk Assessment
EAS Strategic Roadmap
EAS Project Work Initiatives
Misalignment of project objectives
Time and cost overruns
Lack of executive buy-in or support
Over- or under-investment in systems
Unknown and unmet system requirements
Product selection misfit
Misalignment of requirements to needs
Inability to measure project success
Inability to proactively mitigate risk impact
Lack of decision-making traceability
Unclear expectations of tasks and roles

1.2.1 Assess EAS selection readiness

1 – 2 hours

  1. As a group, review Section 1 of the EAS Readiness Assessment Checklist with the core project team and/or project sponsor, item by item. For completed items, tick the corresponding checkbox. Document all incomplete items in the Readiness Remediation Plan table in the first column (“Incomplete Readiness Item”).
  2. For each incomplete item, use your discretion to determine whether the completion is critical in preparation for EAS selection and implementation. This may vary given the complexity of your EAS project. If the item is critical to the project, indicate this with “Y” in the second column (“Criticality (Y/N)”).
  3. For each critical item, reflect on the barriers that have prevented or are preventing its completion. Possible barriers include incomplete task dependencies, low value to effort determination, lack of organizational knowledge or resources, pressure of deadlines, etc. Document these barriers in the third column (“Barriers to Completion”).
  4. Determine a remediation approach for each barrier identified. Document the approach in the fourth column (“Remediation Approach”).
    1. For each remediation activity, designate a due date and remediation owner. Document this in the fifth column (“Due Date and Owner”).
    2. Carry out the remediation of critical tasks and return to this blueprint to kick-start your selection and implementation project.
Input Output
  • EAS Foundation
  • EAS Strategy
  • Readiness remediation approach
  • Validation of ERP project readiness
Materials Participants
  • EAS Readiness Assessment Checklist
  • Project sponsor
  • Core project team

Download the EAS Readiness Assessment Checklist

Build a well-balanced core team to see the project through

Have a cross-departmental team define goals and objectives in order to significantly increase EAS success and improve communication.

  • Hold a meeting with Finance, Operations, and IT stakeholders. The overall objective of the meeting is to confirm that all parties agree on the goals and metrics that gauge success of the EAS project.
  • The kick-off process will significantly improve internal communications. Invite all impacted internal groups to work as a team to address any significant issues before the application process is formally activated.
  • Set up a quarterly review process to understand changing needs. This will change the way the EAS system will be utilized.

“Each individual should understand at least one business area and have a hand in another.”
– Mark Earley
Senior Research Director,
Info-Tech Research Group

Info-Tech Insight
An EAS selection and implementation requires more than just a procurement team. The core EAS project team should be cross-functional. .

Be ready with a resourcing strategy for your EAS project

EAS selection and implementation is a giant undertaking that can rarely be supported by internal resources alone.

It is important to understand where your organization’s resourcing gaps are when embarking on a selection and implementation project. Once gaps are identified, the amount of external support needed from vendor(s), consultants, or system integrators can be determined.

Select from the three most commonly used resourcing strategies for EAS selection and implementation projects:

  • Implement in-house using your own staff.
  • Implement using a combination of your own staff and professional services from the vendor(s) and/or system integrator (SI).
  • Implement using professional services.

Build your implementation team

Prioritize members from your core selection team. They will have strong insight into the tool and its envisioned position in the organization.

General Roles

  1. Integration Specialists
  2. Solution or Enterprise Architects
  3. QA Engineer
  4. IT Service Management Team

External Roles

  1. Vendor’s Implementation Team or Professional Services
  2. Systems Integrator (SI)

Right-size the EAS selection team to ensure you get the right information but are still able to move ahead quickly

Full-Time Resourcing: At least one member of these five team members must be allocated to the selection initiative as a full-time resource.

IT Leader Technical Lead Business Analyst/
Project Manager
Business Lead Process Expert(s)
This team member is an IT director or CIO who will provide sponsorship and oversight from the IT perspective. This team member will focus on application security, integration, and enterprise architecture. This team member elicits business needs and translates them into technology requirements. This team member will provide sponsorship from the business needs perspective. Typically, a CXO or SVP of a business function. These team members are the business process owners who will help steer the requirements and direction.

Info-Tech Insight
It is critical for the selection team to determine who has decision rights. Organizational culture will play the largest role in dictating which team member holds the final say for selection decisions. For more information on stakeholder management and involvement, see this guide.

Complete the project timeline required during your selection phase

Include as many steps as necessary to understand, validate, and compare vendor solutions so you can make a confident, well-informed decision.

Use Info-Tech’s 15-Step Selection Process:

  1. Initiate procurement.
  2. Select procurement manager.
  3. Prepare for procurement; check that prerequisites are met.
  4. Select appropriate procurement vehicle (RFI, RFP, RFQ, etc.).
  5. Assemble procurement teams.
  6. Create procurement project plan.
  7. Identify and notify vendors about procurement.
  8. Configure procurement process.
  9. Gather requirements.
  10. Prioritize requirements.
  11. Build the procurement documentation package.
  12. Issue the procurement.
  13. Evaluate proposals.
  14. Evaluate vendor demos and reference checks.
  15. Recommend a vendor.

Strengthen your procurement. If your organization lacks a clear selection process, refer to Info-Tech's Implement a Proactive and Consistent Vendor Selection Process research to help construct a formal process for procuring application technology.

Download the Implement a Proactive and Consistent Vendor Selection Process

Visualize what success looks like

Understand how success metrics are relevant at each stage of strategy formation by keeping the end in mind. Apply a similar thought model to your other success metrics for a holistic evaluation of your strategy.

Implementation
Pre-Implementation Post-Implementation
Baseline measure Strategic insight Strategic action Success measure End result
Use data you already have. Any given pain point can act as your pre-implementation baseline. Previously, this measure may have been evaluated by asking “what?” or “how much?” Move away from looking at your baseline measure as transactional data, and incorporate the ability to generate strategic insight with your EAS. Change the questions you are asking to drive insights: “who?” “why?” and “how does it affect the business?” Support the business by putting your strategic analytics into action. Ensure there are capabilities built into your ERP to strategically address your baseline measure. Leverage these functions to act on your strategic insights. In the interest of IT and business alignment, speak the same language when measuring success. Use a business success measurement to determine the contribution made by your EAS strategy. Visualize your success in the context of the business as a whole. Projecting success in the interest of your stakeholders will gain and maintain buy-in, allowing you to leverage the strategic functionality of your new EAS.
Example Time to Procure Delay in time to procure caused by bottleneck in requisition processing ERP used to create advanced workflows to streamline requisition approval process Time efficiencies gained free up employee time to focus on more strategic efforts Contributed to strategic operational innovation

Prove the value of your EAS through metrics

Establish baseline metrics early and measure throughout the project can iteratively prove the value of your EAS.

Functional processes IT resource efficiency
Functional benefits and efficiencies gained through effectively diagnosing and meeting business needs. Benefits enabled through reductions in IT system, network, and resource usage.
Example metrics Record to report
  • Days to close month-end
  • Time to produce statements
Market to order
  • Customer retention rate
  • Conversion/Cost per lead
  • Number of help desk requests
  • Number of active users
  • Time to resolution
Quote to cash
  • Sales cycle duration
  • Cash conversion cycle
Issue to resolution
  • # of returns
  • # of customer complaints
  • Time to resolve complaints
Procure to pay
  • Average time to procure
  • Cycle time of purchase order
Forecast to delivery
  • Variance of demand plan
  • Time to replenish inventory
Plan to perform
  • Time to complete plan
  • Variance of plan to actual
Hire to retire
  • Training $ per employee
  • Total overtime cost

Improve baseline metrics through…

  1. Increased help desk efficiency. Through training of personnel and increased efficiency of processes.
  2. Increased level of self-service for end users. Implementation of functionality that matches business needs will increase the efficiency of functional business tasks.
  3. Decreased time to escalation. Knowing when to escalate tasks sooner can decrease wasted effort by tier-one workers.
  4. Automation of simple, repetitive tasks. Automation frees time for more important tasks.

1.3.1 Assemble EAS selection team

1 hour

  1. Working as a group, list key players in the organization that should be in EAS selection team.
  2. Determine the role of each member.
  3. Define the level of commitment each member can have on the EAS selection team. Keep in mind their availabilities during the selection process.
  4. Determine who has decision rights.
Input Output
  • Knowledge of the team, governance structure, and organizational culture
  • List members in EAS selection team
Materials Participants
  • Sticky notes
  • Markers
  • Executive sponsor
  • Core project team

Phase 2

Define your EAS

Phase 1
1.1 Enterprise Application Landscape
1.2 Validate Readiness
1.3 Determine Resourcing

Phase 2
2.1 Capability Mapping
2.2 Requirements Gathering Data Mapping
2.3 Requirements Prioritizing

Phase 3
3.1 Understanding Product Offerings
3.2 RFP & Demo Scripts
3.3 Evaluation
Select and Negotiate

Phase 4
4.1 Prepare for
Implementation

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

Identifying business processes , inventory applications and data flows, gathering requirements and prioritizing them.

This phase involves the following participants:

Key stakeholders from the various areas of the business that will support the project including:

  • CxO (e.g. CIO, CFO)
  • Departmental leaders
  • Project management team
  • Subject matter experts
  • Core project team

Select an Enterprise Application

Leverage Info-Tech’s requirements gathering framework to serve as the basis for capturing your CRM requirements

Requirements Gathering Framework

Info-Tech’s Requirements Gathering Framework is a comprehensive approach to requirements management that can be scaled to any size of project or organization. This framework ensures that the application created will capture the needs of all stakeholders and deliver business value. Don’t treat elicitation, analysis, and validation in isolation: planning, monitoring, communicating, and managing must permeate all three stages in order to avoid makeshift solutions.

Capability vs. process vs. feature

Understanding the difference

When examining HRMS optimization it is important to approach it from the appropriate layer.

Capability:

  • The ability of an entity (e.g. organization or department) to achieve its objectives (APQC, 2017).
  • An ability that an organization, person, or system possesses. They are typically expressed in general and high-level terms and typically require a combination of organization, people, processes, and technology to achieve (TOGAF).

Process:

  • Processes can be manual or technology enabled. A process is a series of interrelated activities that convert inputs into results (outputs).
  • Processes consume resources, require standards for repeatable performance, and respond to control systems that direct the quality, rate, and cost of performance. The same process can be highly effective in one circumstance and poorly effective in another with different systems, tools, knowledge, and people (APQC, 2017).

Feature:

  • A distinguishing characteristic of a software item (e.g. performance, portability, or functionality) (IEEE, 2005).

In today’s complex organizations, it can be difficult to understand where inefficiencies stem from and how performance can be enhanced.

To fix problems and maximize efficiencies, organizations must examine business capabilities and processes to determine gaps and areas of lagging performance.

Info-Tech’s HRIS framework and industry tools such as the APQC’s Process Classification Framework can help make sense of this.

Process inventory

Business capability map (Level 0)

Business Capability Map

If you do not have a documented process model, you can use the APQC Framework to help define your inventory of business processes.
APQC’s Process Classification Framework is a taxonomy of cross-functional business processes intended to allow the objective comparison of organizational performance within and among organizations.

In business architecture, the primary view of an organization is known as a business capability map.

A business capability defines what a business does to enable value creation rather than how.

Business capabilities:

  • Represent stable business functions.
  • Are unique and independent of each other.
  • Will typically have a defined business outcome.

A business capability map provides details that help the business architecture practitioner direct attention to a specific area of the business for further assessment.

EAS process mapping

Objectives The organization’s objectives are typically outcomes that the organization is looking to achieve as a result of the business strategy.
Value Streams Value streams are external/internal processes that help the organization realize its goals.
Capabilities The what: Business capabilities support value streams in the creation and capture of value.
Processes The how: Business processes define how they will fulfill a given capability.

The operating model

An operating model is a framework that drives operating decisions. It helps to set the parameters for the scope of EAS and the processes that will be supported. The operating model will serve to group core operational processes. These groupings represent a set of interrelated, consecutive processes aimed at generating a common output.

The value stream

Value stream defined:

Value Streams Design Product Produce Product Sell Product Customer Service
  • Manufacturers work proactively to design products and services that will meet consumer demand.
  • Products are driven by consumer demand and governmental regulations.
  • Production processes and labor costs are constantly analyzed for efficiencies and accuracies.
  • Quality of product and services are highly regulated through all levels of the supply chain.
  • Sales networks and sales staff deliver the product from the organization to the end consumer.
  • Marketing plays a key role throughout the value stream, connecting consumers’ wants and needs to the products and services offered.
  • Relationships with consumers continue after the sale of products and services.
  • Continued customer support and data mining is important to revenue streams.

Value streams connect business goals to the organization’s value realization activities in the marketplace. Those activities are dependent on the specific industry segment in which an organization operates.

There are two types of value streams: core and support.

  • Core value streams are mostly external-facing. They deliver value to either external or internal customers and they tie to the customer perspective of the strategy map.
  • Support value streams are internal-facing and provide the foundational support for an organization to operate.

An effective method for ensuring all value streams have been considered is to understand that there can be different end-value receivers.

2.1.1 List your key processes

1-3 hours

  1. As a group, discuss the business capabilities, value streams, and business processes.
  2. For each capability determine the following:
    1. Is this capability applicable to our organization?
    2. What application, if any, supports this capability?
  3. Are there any missing capabilities to add?
Input Output
  • Current systems
  • Key processes
  • APQC Framework
  • Organizational process map
  • List of key business processes
Materials Participants
  • APQC Framework
  • Whiteboard, PowerPoint, or flip charts and markers
  • Primary stakeholders in each value stream supported by the EAS
  • Core project team

Activity 2.1.1 – Process inventory

Core finance Core HR Workforce management Talent Management Warehouse management Enterprise asset management
Process Technology Process Technology Process Technology Process Technology Process Technology Process Technology
  • General ledger
  • Accounts payable
  • Accounts receivable
  • GL consolidation
  • Cash management
  • Billing and invoicing
  • Expenses
  • Payroll accounting
  • Tax management
  • Reporting
  • Payroll administration
  • Benefits administration
  • Position management
  • Organizational structure
  • Core HR records
  • Time and attendance
  • Leave management
  • Scheduling
  • Performance management
  • Talent acquisition
  • Offboarding & onboarding
  • Plan layout
  • Manage inventory
  • Manage loading docks
  • Pick, pack, ship
  • Plan and manage workforce
  • Manage returns
  • Transfer product cross-dock
  • Asset lifecycle management
  • Supply chain management
  • Maintenance planning and scheduling
Planning and budgeting Strategic HR Procurement Customer relationship management Facilities management Project management
Process Technology Process Technology Process Technology Process Technology Process Technology Process Technology
  • Budget reporting
  • Variance analysis
  • Multi-year operating plan
  • Monthly forecasting
  • Annual operating plan
  • Compensation planning
  • Workforce planning
  • Succession planning
  • Supplier management
  • Purchase order management
  • Workflow approvals
  • Contract / tender management
  • Contact management
  • Activity management
  • Analytics
  • Plan and acquire
  • Asset maintenance
  • Disposal
  • Project management
  • Project costing
  • Budget control
  • Document management

Gaining Enterprise Architecture Oversight during application selection yields better user satisfaction results

Procurement/Legal Oversight and
Low satisfaction with software selection High satisfaction with software selection
Process % Used % Used Process
Used ROI/Cost Benefit Analysis 42% 43% Used ROI/Cost-Benefit Analysis
Used Formal Decision Criteria 39% 41% Used Formal Decision Criteria
Approval 33% 37% Enterprise Architecture Oversight and Approval
Security Oversight and Approval 27% 36% Security Oversight and Approval
Used Third-Party Data Reports 26% 28% Procurement/Legal Oversight and Approval
Enterprise Architecture Oversight and Approval 26% 28% Used Third-Party Data Reports
Used a Consultant 21% 17% Used a Consultant

High satisfaction was defined as a response of 8, 9, or 10 from the overall recommendation question. Low satisfaction was 7 or less.

Source: SoftwareReviews, 2018

Map data flow

Example ERP data flow

Example ERP data flow

When assessing the current application portfolio that supports your EAS, the tendency will be to focus on the applications under the EAS umbrella. These relate mostly to marketing, sales, and customer service. Be sure to include systems that act as input to, or benefit due to outputs from EAS or similar applications.

Be sure to include enterprise applications that are not included in the EAS application portfolio. Popular systems to consider for POIs include billing, directory services, content management, and collaboration tools.

Integration is paramount: your EAS application often integrates with other applications within the organization. Create an integration map to reflect a system of record and the exchange of data. To increase customer engagement, channel integration is a must (i.e. with robust links to unified communications solutions, email, and VoIP telephony systems).

Enterprise application landscape

Enterprise application landscape

2.1.2 Inventory applications and interactions

1-3 hours

  1. Individually list all electronic systems involved in the EAS function of the organization.
  2. Document data flows into and out of each system to the EAS. Refer to the example on the previous slides (ERP data flow) and sample Enterprise Application map.
  3. Review the processes in place (look at each functional area, including data moving into and out of systems.) Document manual processes. Identify integration points. If flow charts exist for these processes, it may be useful to provide these to the participants.
  4. If possible, diagram the system. Include information direction flow.
Input Output
  • Business process inventory
  • List of applications (if available)
  • Current systems
  • Data flow map
Materials Participants
  • Whiteboard, markers
  • Internal requirements documentation tools (if available)
  • Business analyst(s)
  • Subject matter experts
  • Core project team (optional)

Understand how to navigate the complex web of stakeholders in ERP requirements gathering

Identify which stakeholders to include and what their level of involvement should be during requirements elicitation based on relevant topic expertise.

Sponsor End user IT Business
Description An internal stakeholder who has final sign-off on the ERP project. Frontline users of the ERP technology. Back-end support staff who are tasked with project planning, execution, and eventual system maintenance. Additional stakeholders who will be impacted by any ERP technology changes.
Examples
  • CEO
  • CIO/CTO
  • COO
  • CFO
  • Warehouse personnel
  • Sales teams
  • HR admins
  • Applications manager
  • Vendor relationship manager(s)
  • Director, Procurement
  • VP, Marketing
  • Manager, HR
Value Executive buy-in and support is essential to the success of the project. Often, the sponsor controls funding and resource allocation. End users determine the success of the system through user adoption. If the end user does not adopt the system, the system is deemed useless and benefits realization is poor. IT is likely to be responsible for more in-depth requirements gathering. IT possesses critical knowledge concerning system compatibility, integration, and data. Involving business stakeholders in the requirements gathering will ensure alignment between HR and organizational objectives.

Stakeholder influence vs. interest

Large-scale EAS projects require the involvement of many stakeholders from all corners and levels of the organization, including project sponsors, IT, end users, and business stakeholders. Consider the influence and interest of stakeholders in contributing to the requirements elicitation process and involve them accordingly.

Chart of Stakeholder Involvement during selection

Extract functional and non-functional requirements from the customer interaction business process diagrams

Once the most significant processes have been mapped, the business requirements must be extracted from the maps and transformed into functional and non-functional requirements. The example below illustrates how to extract requirements from an insurance claim process for the Record Claim step.

Task Input Output Risks Opportunities Condition Sample requirements
Record customer service claim Customer email Case record
  • Agent accidentally misses the email and case is not submitted
  • Reduce time to populate customer’s claim information into the case
  • Automation of data capture and routing
  • Pre-population of the case with the email contents
  • Suggested routing based on nature of case
  • Multi-language support

Business:

  • System requires email-to-case functionality

Non-functional:

  • The cases must be supported in multiple languages

Functional:

  • The case must support the following information:
    • Title
    • Customer
    • Subject
    • Case origin
    • Case type

Example claims process

2.2.1 Capture your EAS requirements

Time required varies

  1. Focus groups of 10-20 individuals may be the best way to ensure complete coverage of business requirements for EAS. This group should be cross-functional, with manager- or director-level representation from the departments that have a vested interest in the EAS project.
  2. Use your organization’s standard internal tools or download Info-Tech’s ERP Requirements Template, HRIS Requirements Template, or CRM Requirements Template.
  3. Document the requirements from the elicitation sessions.
  • The core team of business analysts should be present throughout, and the sessions should be led by an experienced facilitator (such as a senior business analyst).
  • Requirements for EAS should focus on achieving the future state rather than replicating the current state.
  • The facilitator should steer the team toward requirements that are solution-agnostic (i.e. not coached in terms of a particular vendor or product). Focus on customer and internal personas to help drive requirements.
Input Output
  • Business unit functional requirements
  • Business process inventory
  • Data flow map
  • Inventory of business requirements
Materials Participants
  • Whiteboard, markers
  • Internal requirements documentation tools (if available)
  • Info-Tech’s ERP Requirements Template, HRIS Requirements Template, or CRM Requirements Template (optional)
  • Business analyst(s)
  • Project manager
  • Subject matter experts
  • Core project team (optional)

Prioritize your EAS requirements to assist with the selection

Requirements prioritization ensures that the ERP selection project team focuses on the right requirements when putting together the RFP.

Prioritization is the process of ranking each requirement based on its importance to project success. Hold a meeting for the domain SMEs, implementation SMEs, project managers, and project sponsors to prioritize the requirements list. At the conclusion of the meeting, each requirement should be assigned a priority level. The implementation SMEs will use these priority levels to ensure efforts are targeted toward the proper requirements and to plan features available on each release.

Use the MoSCoW Model of Prioritization to effectively order requirements.

The MoSCoW Model of Prioritization
Must have Requirements must be implemented for the solution to be considered successful.
Should have Requirements that are high priority should be included in the solution if possible.
Could have Requirements are desirable but not necessary and could be included if resources are available.
Won't have Requirements won’t be in the next release, but will be considered for the future releases.

The MoSCoW model was introduced by Dai Clegg of Oracle UK in 1994. MindTools.

Base your prioritization on the right set of criteria

Effective prioritization criteria

Criteria Description
Regulatory and legal compliance These requirements will be considered mandatory.
Policy compliance Unless an internal policy can be altered or an exception can be made, these requirements will be considered mandatory.
Business value significance Give a higher priority to high-value requirements.
Business risk Any requirement with the potential to jeopardize the entire project should be given a high priority and implemented early.
Likelihood of success Especially in “proof of concept” projects, it is recommended that requirements have good odds.
Implementation complexity Give a higher priority to low implementation difficulty requirements.
Alignment with strategy Give a higher priority to requirements that enable the corporate strategy.
Urgency Prioritize requirements based on time sensitivity.
Dependencies A requirement on its own may be low priority, but if it supports a high-priority requirement, then its priority must match it.

2.3.1 Prioritize your solution requirements

Time required varies

  1. Consolidate all duplicate requirements to form a mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive list of functional and non-functional requirements.
  2. Identify the significance of each requirement for your solution evaluation according to the MoSCoW model. Control the number of mandatory requirements you document. Too many mandatory requirements could create an unrealistic framework for evaluating solutions.
  3. Categorize your requirements and delineate between functional (i.e. capabilities the system will be able to perform) and non-functional (i.e. environmental conditions of the system, such as technical and security requirements).
InputOutput
  • Inventory of business requirements
  • Inventory of business requirements with priorities
MaterialsParticipants
  • Whiteboard, markers
  • Internal requirements documentation tools (if available)
  • Info-Tech’s ERP Requirements Template, HRIS Requirements Template, or CRM Requirements Template (optional)
  • Business analyst(s)
  • Project manager
  • Subject matter experts
  • Core project team

Identify which vendors’ product and capabilities meet your must-have requirements

Highlight must-haves in the RFP

  • Once you have prioritized your business requirements for the EAS initiative, it is time to package them into an RFP.
  • It is critical to highlight must-have requirements in the RFP document. Doing so immediately eliminates vendors who do not feel that their products are suitable for your needs.

WATCH OUT!

Many vendors will try to stretch their capabilities to fit your must-have requirements. Leverage vendor demos in the next stage of selection to quickly rule out products that do not cover your critical requirements.

Identify key process areas where you require vendor knowledge

Example of Key process areas

Completing a process inventory and a list of EAS requirements often shows process areas that need updates and improvement. Take this opportunity to highlight areas where you would benefit from knowing about most recent best practices and technologies.

Inquire about these when engaging the vendor to know their level of knowledge and how their products work best in your industry.

General product knowledge requests are not enough. Be specific.

Determine the product knowledge areas that are specific to your implementation.

Product Knowledge Proof of Concept Development Customer Service Warehousing Core HR Other Overall
Data Security *
Process Improvements * *
Configuration
Data Architecture *
Integration
On premise Infrastructure
Cloud Infrastructure *
Other

Identify the product knowledge that is required in relation to your implementation. This can include core product knowledge and should be related to larger infrastructure and organizational requirements.

More than just functional requirements

What to include What to look at What is differentiating
  • Remember to include must-have conditions that do not directly relate to the behavior or functionality of the EAS product, but rather describe environmental conditions under which the solution must remain effective or qualities that the systems must have.
  • These can include requirements related to capacity, speed, security, availability, and the information architecture and presentation of the user interface.
  • Consider the vendor’s overall ability to execute.
    • Are they financially stable?
    • Do they have the resources to execute?
    • Do they have the skills to execute?
    • Are they able to provide post-implementation support?
  • Vendors understand that SaaS isn’t for everyone. Deployment models are one way they will continue to differentiate themselves.
  • Some vendors choose to compete on breadth and others on depth of expertise in public, private, and hosted cloud offerings.

Info-Tech Insight
Be wary of sunsetting products! Selecting the EAS based on a good knowledge of the vendor’s roadmap allows for business operations to continue without having to repeat a selection and implementation project in the near future.

Dominant use-case scenarios for potential ERP solutions

While an organization may be both product- and service-centric, most organizations fall into one of the two categories.

Use case: Public sector

The service-centric ERP use case is suitable for most organizations in the public sector. With that in mind, consider ERP solutions that offer grant disbursements, fleet management, and staffing/resourcing capabilities.

Product-centric ERP Service-centric ERP
What it is The product-centric ERP is suitable for organizations that manufacture, assemble, distribute, or manage material goods throughout a product lifecycle. ERP vendors and/or products that align to this use case usually cater to industries such as manufacturing, retail, aerospace and defense, distribution, and food and beverage. The service-centric ERP use case is suitable for organizations that provide and manage field services and/or professional services throughout a project lifecycle. ERP vendors and/or products that align to this use case usually cater to industries such as utilities, maintenance and repair, government, education, and professional services (i.e. consulting, legal).
How it works Product-centric ERP has strong functionality in supply chain management, manufacturing, procurement management, and material job and project management. Service-centric ERP has strong functionality in resource job and project management, service management, and customer relationship management.

EAS table stakes vs differentiating features

Make sure features align with your objectives first.

What are table stakes / standard features?

  • For every type of EAS, such as ERP, HRIS, and CRM, certain features are standard, but that doesn’t mean they are all equal.
  • The existence of features doesn’t guarantee quality or functionality to the standards you need. Never assume that yes in a features list means you don’t need to ask for a demo.

What is differentiating/additional feature?

  • Differentiating features take two forms:
    • Some platforms offer differentiating features that are vertical specific.
    • Other platforms offer differentiating features that are considered cutting edge. These cutting-edge features may become table stakes over time.
  • These features may increase productivity but also require process changes.

Info-Tech Insight
If table stakes are all you need from your EAS solution, the only true differentiator for the organization is price. Otherwise, dig deeper to find the best price to value for your needs. Remove the product from your shortlist if table stakes are not met!

Reign-In Ballooning Scope for EAS Selection Projects

Stretching the EAS beyond its core capabilities is a short-term solution for a long-term problem. Educate stakeholders about the limits of EAS technology.

Common pitfalls for EAS selection

  • Tangential capabilities may require separate solutions. It is common for stakeholders to list features such as content management as part of the new EAS platform. While content management goes hand in hand with the EAS’s ability to manage customer interactions, document management is best handled by a standalone platform.

Keeping stakeholders engaged and in line

  • Ballooning scope leads to stakeholder dissatisfaction. Appeasing stakeholders by over customizing the platform will lead to integration and headaches down the road.
  • Make sure stakeholders feel heard. Do not turn down ideas in the midst of an elicitation session. Once the requirements gathering sessions are completed, the project team has the opportunity to mark requirements as “out of scope”, and communicate the reasoning behind the decision.
  • Educate stakeholders on the core functionality of EAS. Many stakeholders do not know the best-fit use cases for EAS platforms. Help end users understand what EAS is good at, and where additional technologies will be needed.

Phase 3

Engage, Evaluate, and Finalize Selection

Phase 1
1.1 Enterprise Application Landscape
1.2 Validate Readiness
1.3 Determine Resourcing

Phase 2
2.1 Capability Mapping
2.2 Requirements Gathering Data Mapping
2.3 Requirements Prioritizing

Phase 3
3.1 Understanding Product Offerings
3.2 RFP & Demo Scripts
3.3 Evaluation Select and Negotiate

Phase 4
4.1 Prepare for Implementation

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

In this phase of the project, you will review your RFx and build an initial list of vendors/implementors to reach out to. The final step is to build your evaluation checklist for rating the incoming responses.

This phase involves the following participants:

Key stakeholders from the various areas of the business that will support the project including:

  • Evaluation team
  • Vendor management team
  • Project management team
  • Core project team

Select an Enterprise Application

Products and vendors demystified

Knowing who can provide the solution will shorten the selection process and provide the most suitable set of features.

The Product The Vendor The VAR
A product is the software, hardware, add-ins, and any value-added services or tools that are bundled together, e.g. SAP Rise (see What is RISE with SAP), SAP S4/HANA, etc. A vendor can carry and sell multiple products or lines of products (e.g. Oracle sells Oracle Fusion and NetSuite, etc.). The Value-added reseller (VAR) can sell a pre-packaged / pre-configured product. VARs are usually partners of the vendor and typically provide other packaged services including system hosting, customization, implementation, and integrations.

Info-Tech Insight
Selecting an Enterprise Application is much more than just selecting a software or product; it is selecting a long-term platform and partner to help achieve long-term strategic goals. Refer to our blueprint Select an ERP Implementation Partner.

Consolidating the vendor shortlist up-front reduces downstream effort

Put the “short” back in shortlist!

  • Radically reduce effort by narrowing the field of potential vendors earlier in the selection process. Too many organizations don’t funnel their vendor shortlist until near the end of the selection process. The result is wasted time and effort evaluating options that are patently not a good fit.
  • Leverage external data (such as SoftwareReviews) and expert opinion to consolidate your shortlist into a smaller number of viable vendors before the investigative interview stage, and eliminate time spent evaluating dozens of RFP responses.
  • Having fewer RFP responses to evaluate means you will have more time to do greater due diligence.

Review your use cases to start your shortlist

Your Info-Tech analysts can help you narrow down the list of vendors that will meet your requirements.

Next steps will include:

  1. Reviewing your requirements.
  2. Checking out SoftwareReviews.
  3. Creating the RFP.
  4. Conducting demos and detailed proposal reviews.
  5. Selecting and contracting with a finalist!

Evaluate software category leaders through vendor rankings and awards

SoftwareReviews

The Data Quadrant is a thorough evaluation and ranking of all software in an individual category to compare platforms across multiple dimensions.

Vendors are ranked by their Composite Score, based on individual feature evaluations, user satisfaction rankings, vendor capability comparisons, and likeliness to recommend the platform.

The Emotional Footprint is a powerful indicator of overall user sentiment toward the relationship with the vendor, capturing data across five dimensions.

Vendors are ranked by their Customer Experience (CX) Score, which combines the overall Emotional Footprint rating with a measure of the value delivered by the solution.

Speak with category experts to dive deeper into the vendor landscape

Fact-based reviews of business software from IT professionals.

Product and category reports with state-of-the-art data visualization.

Top-tier data quality backed by a rigorous quality assurance process.

User-experience insight that reveals the intangibles of working with a vendor.

SoftwareReviews is powered by Info-Tech.

Technology coverage is a priority for Info-Tech, and SoftwareReviews provides the most comprehensive unbiased data on today’s technology. The insights of our expert analysts provide unparalleled support to our members at every step of their buying journey.

CLICK HERE to access SoftwareReviews

Comprehensive software reviews to make better IT decisions.

We collect and analyze the most detailed reviews on enterprise software from real users to give you an unprecedented view into the product and vendor before you buy.

Case Study

Manufacturer and retailer utilizes Info-Tech for goal of unifying four separate ERP systems

INDUSTRY
Manufacturing

SOURCE
Info-Tech Consulting

Challenge Solution Results

An amalgamation of eight different manufacturing, retail, and supply brands that operated four separate ERP systems and processes across the United States had poor visibility into operations.

The organization had plans to unify the brands from a systems perspective and accommodate the company’s growth in a scalable and repeatable way.

Info-Tech was previously engaged to perform an Establish a Concrete ERP Foundation workshop to set the groundwork for the eventual ERP selection.

The organization engaged Info-Tech’s consulting group to assist in requirements gathering and RFP development.

Info-Tech consultants traveled to five different states to gather ERP requirements from stakeholders and identify solution requirements.

Info-Tech developed an ERP requirements matrix from the organization’s processes, including technical requirements and operations/support services.

Info-Tech matched the organization with a use case and weighted requirements to assist in future scoring.

An RFP was constructed using the organization’s requirements. and distributed to 10 qualified vendors for completion.

Strengthen your RFP process with a thorough review

Drive better sourcing outcomes.

A quality SOW is the result of a quality RFI/RFP (RFx).

Use Info-Tech’s RFP Review as a Service to review key items and ensure your RFP will generate quality responses and SOWs.

  • Is it well structured, with a consistent use of fonts and bullets?
  • Is it laid out in sections that are easily identifiable and that progress from high-level to more detailed information?
  • Can a vendor quickly identify the ten (or fewer) things that are most important to you?

Contact Us

3.2.1 Prepare the RFP

1-2 hours

  1. Download Info-Tech’s ERP Request for Proposal Template or prepare internal best-practice RFP tools.
  2. Build your RFP.
    1. Complete the statement of work and general information sections to provide organizational context to your long-listed vendors.
    2. Outline the organization’s procurement instructions for vendors, including due diligence, assessment criteria, and dates.
    3. Input the business requirements document as created in Activity 1.3.1.
    4. Create a scenario overview to provide vendors with an opportunity to give an estimated price.
  3. Obtain approval for your RFP. Each organization has a unique procurement process; follow your own organization’s process as you submit your RFPs to vendors. Ensure compliance with your organization’s standard and gain approval for submitting your RFP.
Input Output
  • Business requirements document
  • Procurement procedures
  • EAS RFP
Materials Participants
  • Internal RFP tools/ templates (if available)
  • Info-Tech’s ERP RFP Template (optional)
  • Procurement SMEs
  • Project manager
  • Core project team (optional)

Download the ERP Request for Proposal Template

Streamline your evaluation of vendor responses

Use Info-Tech’s ERP Vendor Response Template to standardize vendor responses.

  • Vendors tend to use their own standard templates when responding, which complicates evaluations.
  • Customize Info-Tech’s ERP Vendor Response Template to adjust for the scope and content of your project; input your organization’s procurement process and ERP requirements.
  • The template is meant to streamline the evaluation of vendor responses by ensuring you achieve comprehensiveness and consistency across all vendor responses. The template requires vendors to prove their organizational viability, understanding of the problem, and tested technology and implementation methodologies.

Sections of the tool:

1 Executive Summary

2 About the Vendor

3 Understanding of the Challenge

4 Methodology

5 Proposed Solution

6 Project Plan and Timeline

7 Vendor Qualifications

8 References

9 Additional Value-Added Services

10 Additional Value-Added Goods

For an explanation of how advanced features are determined, see Information Presentation – Feature Ranks (Stoplights) in the Appendix.

What to look in vendor responses

Vendor responses to an RFP can be very revealing about whether their product offering aligns with your EAS roadmap.

Validate the vendor responses so that there are no misunderstandings with their offer. Here are key items to validate.

Key items Why is this important?
About the Vendor This is where the vendor will describe itself and prove its organizational viability.
Understanding of the Challenge Demonstrating understanding of the problem is the first step in being able to provide a solution.
Methodology Shows the vendor has a proven methodology to approach and solve the challenge.
Proposed Solution Describes how the vendor will address the challenge. This is a very important section as it will articulate what you will receive from the vendor as a solution.
Project Plan and Timeline Provides an overview of the project management methodology, phases of the project, and what will be delivered and when.
Vendor Qualifications Provides evidence of prior experience with delivering similar projects for similar clients.
References Provides contact information for individuals or organizations for which the vendor has worked and who can vouch for the experience and success of working with this vendor.
Value-Added Services and Goods Allows vendors an opportunity to set themselves apart from the competition with additional services and/or goods applicable to your project but not covered elsewhere in the template.

3.2.2 Build a vendor response template

1-2 hours

  1. Download Info-Tech’s ERP Vendor Response Template.
  2. Validate that the provided template is comprehensive and will collect the information necessary for your organization to effectively evaluate the product and vendor and will inform a decision to invite the vendor in for a demonstration.
  3. Make the small customizations necessary to tailor the template to your organization (i.e. swap out “[Company X]” for your organization’s name).

Download the ERP Vendor Response Template

InputOutput
  • EAS RFP
  • ERP Vendor Response Template
MaterialsParticipants
  • Info-Tech’s ERP Vendor Response Template
  • Procurement SMEs
  • Project manager
  • Core project team

3.2.3 Evaluate RFP responses

Varies

  1. Customize Info-Tech’s EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool to build a vendor and product evaluation framework for your EAS selection team.
  2. Review all RFP responses together with the core project team and stakeholders from procurement (if necessary).
  3. Input vendor solution information into the EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool.
  4. Analyze the vendors against your evaluation framework by paying specific attention to costing, overall score, and evaluation notes and comments.
  5. Identify vendors with whom you wish to arrange vendor demonstration.
  6. Contact vendors and arrange briefings.
InputOutput
  • EAS RFP
  • ERP Vendor Response Template
MaterialsParticipants
  • Info-Tech’s ERP Vendor Response Template
  • Procurement SMEs
  • Project manager
  • Core project team

Download the EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool

Identify specific use cases and develop demonstration scenarios

These techniques can be used to gather requirements now and for vendor demos during the evaluation stage.

Describe use cases to indicate how the various processes will operate. This technique can help end-users describe what the solution must do without needing to know how to describe requirements. Outline scenarios based on these use cases for vendors to demonstrate how their solution can fulfill business requirements.

Define
Define objectives for each specific use case.

Explore
Explore the various process paths and alternate outcomes for each use case.

Build
Build the details of the scenarios to describe the roles of the people involved and the detailed process steps to be accomplished.

Use
For each scenario, outline the expected outputs and variations.

Info-Tech Insight
Do not exceed three vendors when selecting participants for a product demonstration. Each vendor demonstration should last between one day and one week, depending on the scope of the project. Exceeding the threshold of three vendors can be massively time consuming and yield diminishing returns.

Conduct vendor demos that extend beyond baseline requirements

  • Demo scripts should focus on differentiating vendor processes and capabilities that contribute to achieving your business’ strategic objectives.
  • You want vendors to show you what differentiates them and what can they do that is specific to your industry.
  • Avoid focusing on baseline EAS capabilities. While this may drive consistency across demonstrations, you will not get a clear picture of how one vendor may align with your unique business needs.
  • Ask the vendor questions pertaining to the differentiating factors listed below. Consider if the differentiating factors are worthwhile over the baseline capabilities shown.
Adhere to this framework when crafting your scenarios:
Simple and straightforward Series of steps
  • A straightforward narrative of what you need the product to do.
  • Once written, scenarios should be circulated to key stakeholders in the organization for validation.
  • Demonstrate how a user would interact with the system.
  • Should not be an explanation of specific features/functions.
Specific Suitable for your business
  • Demonstrate exactly what you need the system to do, but don’t get into implementation details – don’t go too far into the how.
  • Select only critical functions that must be demonstrated.
  • Scenarios should reflect current realities within the organization, while still allowing processes to be improved.

Add your scenarios to Info-Tech’s sample EAS demo script

Take a holistic approach to vendor and product evaluation

Almost – or equally – as important as evaluating vendor feature capabilities is the need to evaluate vendor viability and non-functional aspects of the EAS solution. Include an evaluation of the following criteria in your vendor scoring methodology.

Vendor capability Description
Usability and Intuitiveness The degree to which the system interface is easy to use and intuitive to end users.
Ease of IT Administration The degree to which the IT administrative interface is easy to use and intuitive to IT administrators.
Ease of Data Integration The relative ease with which the system can be integrated with an organization’s existing application environment including legacy systems, point solutions, and other large enterprise applications.
Ease of Customization The relative ease with which a system can be customized to accommodate niche or industry-specific business or functional needs.
Vendor Support Options The availability of vendor support options including selection consulting, application development resources, implementation assistance, and ongoing support resources.
Availability and Quality of Training The availability of quality training services and materials that will enable users to get the most out of the product selected.
Product Strategy, Direction, and Rate of Improvement The vendor’s proven ability for constant product improvement, deliberate strategic direction, and overall commitment to research and development efforts in responding to emerging trends.

Info-Tech Insight
Evaluating the vendor capabilities, not just product capabilities, is particularly important with EAS solutions. EAS solutions are typically long-term commitments; ensure that your organization is teaming up with a vendor or provider that you feel you can work well with and depend on.

Case Study

Structured RFP and demo processes ease the pain of vendor evaluations during the selection phase.

INDUSTRY
Automotive

SOURCE
Research Interview

Challenge Solution Results

This company is one of the largest automotive manufacturers worldwide and has various manufacturing facilities and distribution centers across Canada.

With over 8,000 employees, the company has a multifaceted health and safety program. While head office enabled and used the health and safety module within the existing HRIS, some divisions within the company found the system complex and were still relying heavily on manual entry spreadsheets for incident investigations. As a result, the company decided to explore other options.

A project team was created, led by a project manager from head office’s IT department. The team also included health and safety specialists from across the organization, who served as subject matter experts.

The team put together a project outline, a roadmap for required functionality, and a business case to present to senior leadership, highlighting benefits and potential payback.

After acquiring executive sponsorship, the team developed a Request for Proposal that was sent to 11 vendors.

Among the evaluation criteria set in the RFP, injury cost analysis and analytics on safety were identified as the most critical requirements. Based on this criteria, the team narrowed down the options to four RFP responses, which were opened to 16 different sites to ensure consensus across the company.

The team developed demo scripts to guide the product demonstrations. They also built evaluation scorecards that were used to narrow down the selection to two vendors. Ultimately, the final selection decision came down to how well the vendors’ teams knew the business, and the vendor that demonstrated greater industry expertise was selected.

3.2.4 Build a demo script for product demonstration evaluation

1-2 hours

  1. With the EAS selection team, use Info-Tech’s ERP Vendor Demonstration Script, HRIS Vendor Demonstration Script, or CRM Vendor Demonstration Script to write a demo script that reflects your organization’s EAS needs.
  2. Outline the logistics of the demonstration in the Introduction section of the template. Be sure to outline the total length of the demo and the amount of time that should be dedicated to the following:
    1. Product demonstration in response to the demo script.
    2. Showcase of unique product elements, not reflective of the demo script.
    3. Question and answer session.
    4. Breaks and other potential interruptions.
  3. Provide prompts for the vendor to display the capabilities by listing and describing usage scenarios by functional area. For example, when asking a vendor to demonstrate financial and accounting management capabilities, you may break scenarios out by task (e.g. general ledger, accounts payable) or user role (e.g. finance manager, administrator).

Info-Tech Insight
Challenge vendor project teams during product demonstrations. Asking the vendor to make adjustments or customizations on the fly will allow you to get an authentic feel for product capability and flexibility and for the degree of adaptability of the vendor project team. Ask the vendor to demonstrate how to do things not listed in your user scenarios, such as change system visualizations or design, change underlying data, add additional data sets, demonstrate collaboration capabilities, or trace an audit trail.

3.2.4 Build a demo script for product demonstration evaluation

Before the actual demonstrations, remember to communicate to the team the scenarios to be covered. Distribute the scripts ahead of the demonstrations so that the evaluation team know what is expected from the vendors.

Input Output
  • Business requirements document
  • Logistical considerations
  • Usage scenarios by functional area
  • EAS demo script
Materials Participants
  • Info-Tech’s ERP Vendor Demonstration Script, HRIS Vendor Demonstration Script, or CRM Vendor Demonstration Script
  • Business analyst(s)
  • Core project team

A vendor scoring model provides a clear anchor point for your evaluation of EAS vendors based on a variety of inputs

A vendor scoring model is a systematic method for effectively assessing competing vendors. A weighted-average scoring model is an approach that strikes a strong balance between rigor and evaluation speed.

How do I build a scoring model? What are some of the best practices?
  • Start by shortlisting the key criteria you will use to evaluate your vendors. Functional capabilities should always be a critical category, but you’ll also want to look at criteria such as affordability, architectural fit, and vendor viability.
  • Depending on the complexity of the project, you may break down some criteria into sub-categories to assist with evaluation (for example, breaking down functional capabilities into constituent use cases so you can score each one).
  • One you’ve developed the key criteria for your project, the next step is weighting each criteria. Your weightings should reflect the priorities for the project at hand. For example, some projects may put more emphasis on affordability, others on vendor partnership.
  • Using the information collected in the subsequent phases of this blueprint, score each criteria from 1-100, then multiply by the weighting factor. Add up the weighted scores to arrive at the aggregate evaluation score for each vendor on your shortlist.
  • While the criteria for each project may vary, it’s helpful to have an inventory of repeatable criteria that can be used across application selection projects. The next slide contains an example that you can add or subtract from.
  • Don’t go overboard on the number of criteria: five to ten weighted criteria should be the norm for most projects. The more criteria (and sub-criteria) you must score against, the longer it will take to conduct your evaluation. Always remember – link the level of rigor to the size and complexity of your project! It’s possible to create a convoluted scoring model that takes significant time to fill out but yields little additional value.
  • Creation of the scoring model should be a consensus-driven activity between IT, procurement, and the key business stakeholders – it should not be built in isolation. Everyone should agree on the fundamental criteria and weights that are employed.
  • Consider using not just the outputs of investigative interviews and RFP responses to score vendors, but also third-party review services like SoftwareReviews.

Info-Tech Insight
Even the best scoring model will still involve some “art” rather than science – scoring categories such as vendor viability always entail a degree of subjective interpretation.

Establish vendor evaluation criteria

Vendor demonstrations are an integral part of the selection process. Having clearly defined selection criteria will help with setting up relevant demos and informing the vendor scorecards.

Vendor evaluation criteria (weight)

Functionality (30%) Ease of Use (25%)
  • Breadth of capability
  • Tactical capability
  • Operational capability
  • End-user usability
  • Administrative usability
  • UI attractiveness
  • Self-service options
Cost (15%) Vendor (15%)
  • Maintenance
  • Support
  • Licensing
  • Implementation (internal and external costs)
  • Support model
  • Customer base
  • Sustainability
  • Product roadmap
  • Proof of concept
  • Implementation model
Technology (15%)
  • Configurability options
  • Customization requirements
  • Deployment options
  • Security and authentication
  • Integration environment
  • Ubiquity of access (mobile)

Info-Tech Insight
Do not buy something that does not fit your functional needs just because it is the cheapest. ERP is a massive, long-term investment. If you purchase a system that does not contain the functionality that meets the organization’s business needs, not only will you face issues with user adoption, but you may also face having to revisit your ERP project down the road. In the end, this will cost you more than it will save you.

Conduct client reference interviews to identify how other organizations have successfully used the vendor’s solution

Request references from the vendors. Make sure the vendors deliver what they promise.

Vendors are inevitably going to provide references that will give positive feedback, but don’t be afraid to dig into the interviews to understand some of the limitations related to the solution.

  • Even if a vendor is great for one client doesn’t necessarily mean it will fit for you. Ask the vendor to provide references from organizations in your own or a similar industry or from someone who has automated similar business processes or outlined similar expectations.
  • Use these reference calls as an opportunity to gain a more accurate understanding of the quality of the vendor’s service support and professional services.
  • If you are looking to include a high level of customization in your EAS solution, pay particular attention to this step and the client responses, as these will help you understand how easy a vendor is to work with.
  • Make the most of your client reference interviews by preparing your questions in advance and following a specific script.

Sample Reference Check Questions

Use Info-Tech’s Sample Reference Check Questions to provide a framework and starting point for your interviews with a vendor’s previous clients. Review the questions and customize to fit your needs.

Determine costs of the solution

Ensure the business case includes both internal and external costs related to the new EAS platform, allocating costs of project managers to improve accuracy of overall costs and level of success.

EAS solutions include application costs and costs to design processes, install, and configure. These start-up costs can be a significant factor in whether the initial purchase is feasible.

EAS vendor costs Internal costs
  • Application licensing
  • Implementation and configuration
  • Professional services
  • Maintenance and support
  • Training
  • Third-party add-ons
  • Data transformation
  • Integration
  • Project management
  • Business readiness
  • Change management
  • Resourcing (user groups, design/consulting, testing)
  • Training
  • Auditors (if regulatory requirements need vetting)
When thinking about vendor costs, also consider the matching internal cost associated with the vendor activity (e.g. data cleansing, internal support). Project management is a top-five critical success factor at all stages of an enterprise application initiative from planning to post-implementation (Information Systems Frontiers). Ensuring that costs for such critical areas are accurately represented will contribute to success.

Bring in the right resources to guarantee success. Work with the PMO or project manager to get creating the SOW.

60% of IT projects are not finished “mostly or always” on time (Wellingtone, 2018).

55% of IT personnel feel that the business objectives of their software projects are clear to them (Geneca, 2017).

Download the blueprint Improve Your Statements of Work to Hold Your Vendors Accountable to define requirements for installation and configuration.

3.3.1 Establish your evaluation criteria

Time required varies

Customize Info-Tech’s RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool to build an evaluation framework for vendor responses based on set criteria rather than relative comparisons.

This tool allows you to evaluate whether your organization’s requirements have been met by the vendor RFP response and provides a location for comprehensive documentation of the RFP response and demonstration details, including costing and availability/quality of product features, architecture, and vendor support.

Finally, the tool gives you the ability to evaluate your shortlisted vendors’ demonstrations.

InputOutput
  • Business requirements document
  • Logistical considerations
  • Usage scenarios by functional area
  • EAS evaluation criteria
MaterialsParticipants
  • Info-Tech’s EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool
  • Procurement SMEs
  • Core project team

3.3.1 Establish your evaluation criteria

Time required varies

  1. With the EAS selection team, brainstorm a list of criteria against which you are going to evaluate each vendor and product.
  2. Categorize each criteria into four to eight groups.
  3. Assign ranked weightings to each category of evaluation criteria. The weightings should add up to 100%. Be sure to identify which criteria are most important to your team by assigning higher weightings to those criteria. If you are having trouble assigning ranked weightings to criteria, take your team through an exercise of ranking pairs. For example, if deciding on the ranked importance of cost, ease of use, and vendor support, break down the discussion by addressing just two criteria at a time: “Between cost and ease of use, which is more important?” If cost is selected… “Between cost and vendor support, which is more important?” If cost is selected again, decide on your second and third rankings by addressing the remaining two criteria… “Between vendor support and ease of use, which is more important?”
  4. Document the final output from this activity as an input to your EAS selection. Optionally, record it in Info-Tech’s EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool.

Download the EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool

Info-Tech Insight
Do not reveal your evaluation criteria to vendors. Allowing vendors to see what matters most to your organization may sway their response and/or demo. Avoid this by keeping your decided evaluation criteria and weightings among your selection team only.

3.3.2 Evaluate vendor product demonstrations

Time required varies

  1. Using the demonstration script and vendor criteria previously established, customize Info-Tech’s EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool to build a scorecard that quickly evaluates vendor product demonstrations.
  2. Distribute the scorecard to every member of the team who is evaluating a particular demonstration.
  3. Evaluate each vendor product demonstration using the tool.
  4. Average all scores from each vendor demonstration to inform your selection decision. Note that the vendor with the highest overall score may not necessarily be the best fit for your organization.
Input Output
  • Demonstration script
  • Evaluation criteria
  • ERP demonstration vendor scores
Materials Participants
  • Info-Tech’s EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool
  • Core project team

Download the EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool

Decision Point: Select the Finalist

After reviewing all vendor responses to your RFP, conducting vendor demos, and running a pilot project (if applicable) – the time has arrived to select your finalist.

All core selection team members should hold a session to score each shortlisted vendor against the criteria enumerated on the previous slide, based on an in-depth review of proposals, the demo sessions, and any pilots or technical assessments.

The vendor that scores the highest in aggregate is your finalist.

Congratulations – you are now ready to proceed to final negotiation and inking a contract. This blueprint provides a detailed approach on the mechanics of a major vendor negotiation.

Get the best value out from your EAS vendor. Negotiate on your own terms.

Here are a few tips common to EAS vendors and its offerings.

Vendors will give time-limited discounts to obtain your buy-in.

  • Depending on your procurement process, it is good practice to have at least two competing vendors in the running to obtain the best value.
  • Make sure that the package offered is coherent – that there are no gaps in the product offering.
  • Ask for access to a higher level of customer care or even developers to obtain quicker, specific support
  • Inquire about specific support and patching service, especially if you have customizations.
  • Ask for additional hours for training and support, pre- and post- implementation.
  • Think long-term – you want to have a good working relationship over the long haul, with a vendor that fits with your overall strategy, and not have to repeat and negotiate often.

Use Info-Tech’s vendor services

Info-Tech’s vendor management services has price benchmarks as well knowledgeable advisors who can help evaluate proposals to obtain the best value

Speak to a vendor management services’ advisor today.

Contact Us

Communicate to the vendor whether they were accepted or rejected

Communicate with each vendor following the demonstration and product evaluation. Ask follow-up questions, highlight areas of concern, and inform them of their status in the selection process.

The RFP process is a standard business practice. As a customer, you are not under any obligation to educate the vendor as to the details of acceptance or rejection. However, consider every point of contact as an opportunity to build a strong network of potential vendors to help you acquire the best products for your organization.

Use Info-Tech’s Vendor Communication Set template to communicate with the vendor following the demonstration and product evaluations. This set includes:

Rejection Notice: Inform the vendor that they are no longer under consideration and highlight opportunities for future debrief.

Approval Notice: Inform the vendor of its progress to the next stage of selection and identify next steps.

Go to this link

Phase 4

Prepare for Implementation

Phase 1
1.1 Enterprise Application Landscape
1.2 Validate Readiness
1.3 Determine Resourcing

Phase 2
2.1 Capability Mapping
2.2 Requirements Gathering Data Mapping
2.3 Requirements Prioritizing

Phase 3
3.1 Understanding Product Offerings
3.2 RFP & Demo Scripts
3.3 Evaluation Select and Negotiate

Phase 4
4.1 Prepare for Implementation

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

Discussion on what it takes to transition to a proper implementation.

Key stakeholders from the various areas of the business that will support the project including:

  • Project management team
  • Core project team

Select an Enterprise Application

Leverage Info-Tech’s research to plan and execute your EAS implementation

Use Info-Tech Research Group’s three-phase implementation process to guide your own planning.

Assess

Prepare

Govern and course correct

Establish and execute an end-to-end, agile framework to succeed with the implementation of a major enterprise application.

Visit this link

External resources are available for implementations

Organizations rarely have sufficient internal staffing to resource an EAS project on their own. Consider the options for closing the gap in internal resource availability.

The most common project resourcing structures for enterprise projects are:

Your own staff +

1 Management Consultant

2 Vendor Consultant

3 System Integrator

Consider the following:

Internal vs. External Roles and Responsibilities

Clearly delineate between internal and external team responsibilities and accountabilities, and communicate this to your technology partner upfront.

Internal vs. External Accountabilities

Accountability is different than responsibility. Your vendor or SI partner may be responsible for completing certain tasks, but be careful not to outsource accountability for the implementation – ultimately, the internal team will be accountable.

Partner Implementation Methodologies

Often vendors and/or SIs will have their own preferred implementation methodology. Consider the use of your partner's implementation methodology; however, you know what will work for your organization.

Info-Tech Insight
When contemplating a resourcing structure, consider:

  • Availability of in-house implementation competencies and resources.
  • Timeline and constraints.
  • Integration environment complexity.

Review your options for external resources

Narrow your search for a management consultant, vendor consultant, or system integrator partner by understanding under which circumstances each would be most appropriate.

When to choose… Management consultant Vendor consultant System integrators
  • There is an existing and trusted relationship.
  • Scope of work includes consideration of internal IT operations, costing, etc.
  • Organization requires external industry expertise for strategy formulation.
  • They will have a role in overall change management within the enterprise.
  • There are no concerns with overall IT processes or capabilities.
  • The project scope is restricted to a single technology or application.
  • There is minimal integration with other systems.
  • The consultant has no role in business process change.
  • They will be a specialist reporting to other consultants.
  • Project includes products from different vendors or multiple add-ons.
  • Extensive integration is required with legacy or other applications.
  • They will be responsible for outsourced operational support or development following implementation.

Info-Tech Insight
Depending on your internal resourcing constraints and IT maturity, you may need to work with multiple partners. If this is the case, just be aware that working with multiple partners can complicate vendor relationship management and makes having a dedicated vendor or partner relationship manager even more important.

4.1.1 Establish team composition

1 – 2 hours

Utilize Info-Tech’s Governance and Management of Enterprise Software Implementation to establish your team composition. Within that blueprint:

  1. Assess the skills necessary for an implementation. Inventory the competencies required for the implementation project team. Map your internal resources to each competency as applicable.
  2. Select your internal implementation team. Determine who needs to be involved closely with the implementation. Key stakeholders should also be considered as members of your implementation team.
  3. Identify the number of external consultants/support required for implementation. Consider your in-house skills, timeline considerations, integration environment complexity, and cost constraints as you make your team composition plan. Be sure to dedicate an internal resource to managing the vendor and partner relationships.
  4. Document the roles and responsibilities, accountabilities, and other expectations of your team as they relate to each step of the implementation.
Input Output
  • Skills assessment
  • Stakeholder analysis
  • Vendor partner selection
  • Team composition
Materials Participants
  • Sticky notes
  • Whiteboard
  • Markers
  • Project Team

Governance and Management of Enterprise Software Implementation

Follow our iterative methodology with a task list focused on the business must-have functionality to achieve rapid execution and to allow staff to return to their daily work sooner.

Visit this link

Ensure your implementation team has a high degree of trust and communication

If external partners are needed, dedicate an internal resource to managing the vendor and partner relationships.

Communication Proximity Trust
Teams must have some type of communication strategy. This can be broken into:
  • Regularity: Having a set time each day to communicate progress and a set day to conduct retrospectives.
  • Ceremonies: Injecting awards and continually emphasizing delivery of value can encourage relationship building and constructive motivation.
  • Escalation: Voicing any concerns and having someone responsible for addressing those concerns.
Distributed teams create complexity as communication can break down. This can be mitigated by:
  • Location: Placing teams in proximity can close the barrier of geographical distance and time zone differences.
  • Inclusion: Making a deliberate attempt to pull remote team members into discussions and ceremonies.
  • Communication tools: Having the right technology (e.g. video conference) can help bring teams closer together virtually.
Members should trust that other members are contributing to the project and completing their required tasks on time. Trust can be developed and maintained by:
  • Accountability: Having frequent quality reviews and feedback sessions. As work becomes more transparent, people become more accountable.
  • Role clarity: Having a clear definition of what everyone’s role is.

Create a formal communication process throughout the EAS implementation

Establish a comprehensive communication process around the EAS enterprise roll-out to ensure that end users stay informed.

The EAS kick-off meeting(s) should encompass:

  • Target business-user requirements
  • Target quality of service (QoS) metrics
  • Other IT department needs
  • Special consideration needs
  • Tangible business benefits of application
  • The high-level application overview

The overall objective for inter-departmental EAS kick-off meetings is to confirm that all parties agree on certain key points and understand platform rationale and functionality.

The kick-off process will significantly improve internal communications by inviting all affected internal IT groups, including business units, to work together to address significant issues before the application process is formally activated.

Department groups or designated trainers should take the lead and implement a process for:

  • Scheduling EAS platform roll-out/kick-off meetings.
  • Soliciting preliminary input from the attending groups to develop further training plans.
  • Establishing communication paths and the key communication agents from each department who are responsible for keeping lines open moving forward.

Plan for your implementation of EAS based on deployment model

Place your EAS solution into your IT landscape by configuring and adjusting the tool based on your specific deployment method.

On-Premises SaaS-based
  1. Identify custom features and configuration items
  2. Train developers and IT staff on new software investment
  3. Install software
  4. Configure software
  5. Test installation and configuration
  6. Test functionality
  1. Train developers and IT staff on new software investment
  2. Set up connectivity
  3. Identify VPN or internal solution
  4. Check firewalls
  5. Validate bandwidth regulations

Integration is a top IT challenge and critical to the success of the EAS solution

EAS solutions are most effective when they are integrated with ERP, HRIS, and CRM solutions.

Data interchange between the EAS solution and other data sources is necessary Formulate a comprehensive map of the systems, hardware, and software with which the EAS solution must be able to integrate. Master data needs to constantly be synchronized; without this, you lose out on one of the primary benefits of integration. These connections should be bidirectional for maximum value (i.e. marketing data to the CRM, customer data to MMS).
Specialized projects that include an intricate prospect or customer list and complex rules may need to be built by IT The more custom fields you have in your EAS and point solutions, the more schema mapping you will have to do. Include this information in the RFP to receive guidance from vendors regarding the ease with which integration can be achieved.
Pay attention to legacy apps and databases If you have a legacy EAS and databases, more custom code will be required. Many vendors claim that custom integrations can be performed for most systems, but custom comes at a cost. Don’t just ask if they can integrate; ask how long it will take and for references from organizations which have been successful in this.

Scenario: Failure to address EAS data integration will cost you in the long run

A company spent $15 million implementing a new CRM system in the cloud and decided NOT to spend an additional $1.5 million to do a proper cloud DI tool procurement. The mounting costs followed.

Cost element – Custom Data Integration $
2 FTEs for double entry of sales order data $ 100,000/year
One-time migration of product data to CRM $ 240,000 otc
Product data maintenance $ 60,000/year
Customer data synchronization interface build $ 60,000 otc
Customer data interface maintenance $ 10,000/year
Data quality issues $ 100,000/year
New SaaS integration built in year 3 $ 300,000 otc
New SaaS integration maintenance $ 150,000/year
Cost element – Data Integration Tool $
DI strategy and platform implementation $1,500,000 otc
DI tool maintenance $ 15,000/year
New SaaS integration point in year 3 $ 300,000 otc

Comparison of Solution TCOs Chart

Custom integration is costing this organization $300,000/year for one SaaS solution.

The proposed integration solution would have paid for itself in 3-4 years and saved exponential costs in the long run.

Proactively address data quality in the EAS during implementation

Data quality is a make-or-break issue in an EAS platform; garbage in is garbage out.

  • EAS solutions are one of the leading offenders for generating poor quality data. As such, it’s important to have a plan in place for structuring your data architecture in such a way that poor data quality is minimized from the get-go.
  • Having a plan for data quality should precede data migration efforts; some types of poor data quality can be mitigated prior to migration.
  • There are five main types of poor-quality data found in EAS platforms.
    • Duplicate data: Duplicate records can be a major issue. Leverage dedicated de-dupe tools to eliminate them.
    • Stale data: Out-of-date customer information can reduce the usefulness of the platform. Use automated social listening tools to help keep data fresh.
    • Incomplete data: Records with missing info limit platform value. Specify data validation parameters to mandate that all fields are filled in.
    • Invalid and conflicting data: Can create cascading errors. Establishing conflict resolution rules in ETL tools for data integration can reduce issues.

Info-Tech Insight
If you have a complex EAS environment, appoint data stewards for each major domain and procure a de-dupe tool. As the complexity of EAS system-to-system integrations increase, so will the chance that data quality errors will crop up – for example, bi-directional POI with other sources of customer information dramatically increase the chances of conflicting/duplicate data.

Profile data, eliminate dead weight, and enforce standards to protect data

Identify and eliminate dead weight Poor data can originate in the firm’s EAS system. Custom queries, stored procedures, or profiling tools can be used to assess the key problem areas.
Loose rules in the EAS system lead to records of no significant value in the database. Those rules need to be fixed, but if changes are made before the data is fixed, users could encounter database or application errors, which will reduce user confidence in the system.
  • Conduct a data flow analysis: map the path that data takes through the organization.
  • Use a mass cleanup to identify and destroy dead weight data. Merge duplicates either manually or with the aid of software tools. Delete incomplete data, taking care to reassign related data.
  • COTS packages typically allow power users to merge records without creating orphaned records in related tables, but custom-built applications typically require IT expertise.
Create and enforce standards and policies Now that the data has been cleaned, it’s important to protect the system from relapsing.
Work with business users to find out what types of data require validation and which fields should have changes audited. Whenever possible, implement drop-down lists to standardize values and make programming changes to ensure that truncation ceases.
  • Truncated data is usually caused by mismatches in data structures during either one-time data loads or ongoing data integrations.
  • Don’t go overboard on assigning required fields; users will just put key data in note fields.
  • Discourage the use of unstructured note fields: the data is effectively lost except if it gets subpoenaed.

Info-Tech Insight
Data quality concerns proliferate with the customization level of your platform. The more extensive the custom integration points and module/database extensions that you have made, the more you will need to have a plan in place for managing data quality from a reactive and proactive standpoint.

Ensure requirements are met with robust user acceptance testing

User acceptance testing (UAT) is a test procedure that helps to ensure end-user requirements are met. Test cases can reveal bugs before the suite is implemented.

Five secrets of UAT success

1 Create the plan With the information collected from requirements gathering, create the plan. Make sure this information is added to the main project plan documentation.
2 Set the agenda The time allotted will vary depending on the functionality being tested. Ensure that the test schedule allows for the resolution of issues and discussion.
3 Determine who will participate Work with relevant stakeholders to identify the people who can best contribute to system testing. Look for experienced power users who have been involved in earlier decision making about the system.
4 Highlight acceptance criteria With the UAT group, pinpoint the criteria to determine system acceptability. Refer to requirements specified in use cases in the initial requirements-gathering stages of the project.
5 Collect end user feedback Weaknesses in resolution workflow design, technical architecture, and existing customer service processes can be highlighted and improved with ongoing surveys and targeted interviews.

Calculate post-deployment metrics to assess measurable value of the project

Track the post-deployment results from the project and compare the metrics to the current state and target state.

EAS selection and implementation metrics
Description Formula Current or estimated Target Post-deployment
End-user satisfaction # of satisfied users
# of end users
70% 90% 85%
Percentage over/under estimated budget Amount spent – 100%
Budget
5% 0% 2%
Percentage over/under estimated timeline Project length – 100%
Estimated timeline
10% -5% -10%
EAS strategy metrics
Description Formula Current or estimated Target Post-deployment
Number of leads generated (per month) # of leads generated 150 200 250
Average time to resolution (in minutes) Time spent on resolution
# of resolutions
30 minutes 10 minutes 15 minutes
Cost per interaction by campaign Total campaign spending
# of customer interactions
$17.00 $12.00 $12.00

Continue to adapt your governance model

Your EAS and applications environment will continue to evolve. Make sure your governance model is always ready to capture the everchanging needs.

Business needs will not stop changing whether you have an ongoing EAS or other application project. It is thus important to keep your governance efficient and streamlined to capture these needs to then make the EAS continue deliver value and remain aligned to long-term corporate objectives.

Visit this link

Summary of Accomplishment

Select an Enterprise Application

EAS technology is critical to facilitating an organization’s flow of information across business units. It allows for seamless integration of systems and creates a holistic view of the enterprise to support decision making. Having a structured approach to gathering the necessary resources, defining key requirements, and engaging with the right shortlist of vendors to pick the best finalist is crucial.

This selection guide allows organizations to execute a structured methodology for picking an EAS that aligns with their needs. This includes:

  • Alignment and prioritization of key business and technology drivers for an EAS selection.
  • Identification and prioritization of the EAS requirements.
  • Construction of a robust EAS RFP.
  • A strong market scan of key players.
  • A survey of crucial implementation considerations.

This formal EAS selection initiative will drive business-IT alignment, identify data and integration priorities, and allow for the rollout of a platform that’s highly likely to satisfy all stakeholder needs.

If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

Contact your account representative for more information.
workshops@infotech.com
1-888-670-8889

Research Contributors

Name Title Organization
Anonymous Anonymous Telecommunications industry
Anonymous Anonymous Construction material industry
Anonymous Anonymous Automotive industry
Corey Tenenbaum Head of IT Taiga Motors
Mark Earley Director, Consulting Info-Tech Research Group
Ricardo di Olivera Research Director, Enterprise Applications Info-Tech Research Group

Bibliography

“2016 Report on ERP Systems and Enterprise Software.” Panorama Consulting Solutions, 2016. Web.

“2018 Report on ERP Systems and Enterprise Software.” Panorama Consulting Solutions, 2018. Web.

“2022 HRIS Software Report.” SoftwarePath, 2022 . Web

Cross-Industry Process Classification Framework (PCF) Version 7.2.1. APQC, 26 Sept. 2019. Web.

“Doomed From the Start? Why a Majority of Business and IT Teams Anticipate Their Software Development Projects Will Fail.” Geneca, 25 Jan. 2017. Web.

Farhan, Marwa Salah, et al. “A Systematic Review for the Determination and Classification of the CRM Critical Success Factors Supporting with Their Metrics.” Future Computing and Informatics Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, Dec. 2018, pp. 398–416.

Gheorghiu, Gabriel. “ERP Buyer’s Profile for Growing Companies.” SelectHub, 23 Sept. 2022. Web

“Process Frameworks.” APQC, 4 Nov. 2020. Web.

“Process vs. Capability: Understanding the Difference.” APCQ, 2017. Web.

Savolainen, Juha, et al. “Transitioning from Product Line Requirements to Product Line Architecture.” 29th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC'05), IEEE, vol. 1, 2005, pp. 186-195, doi: 10.1109/COMPSAC.2005.160

Saxena, Deepak, and Joe McDonagh. "Evaluating ERP Implementations: The Case for a Lifecycle based Interpretive Approach." Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation 22.1 (2019): pp29-37.

“SOA Reference Architecture – Capabilities and the SOA RA.” The Open Group, TOGAF, n.d. Web.

Smith, Anthony. “How To Create A Customer-Obsessed Company Like Netflix.” Forbes, 12 Dec. 2017. Web.

"The Moscow Method", MindTools. Web.

“The State of CRM Data Management 2020.” Validity, 2020. Web.

“The State of Project Management Annual Survey 2018.” Wellingtone, 2018. Web.

“Why HR Projects Fail.” Unleash, 2021. Web

Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}508|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: N/A
  • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
  • member rating average days saved: N/A
  • Parent Category Name: Application Development
  • Parent Category Link: /application-development
  • You have identified that a change to your sourcing strategy is required, based on market and company factors.
  • You are ready to select a new sourcing partner to drive innovation, time to market, increased quality, and improved financial performance.
  • Taking on a new partner is a significant investment and risk, and you must get it right the first time.
  • You need to make a change now to prevent losing clients and falling further behind your performance targets and your market.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

Selecting a sourcing partner is a function of matching complex factors to your own firm. It is not a simple RFP exercise; it requires significant introspection, proactive planning, and in-depth investigation of potential partners to choose the right fit.

Impact and Result

Choosing the right sourcing partner is a four-step process:

  1. Assess your companies' skills and processes in the key areas of risk to sourcing initiatives.
  2. Based on the current situation, define a profile for the matching sourcing partner.
  3. Seek matching partners from the market, either in terms of vendor partners or in terms of sourcing locations.
  4. Based on the choice of partner, build a plan to implement the partnership, define metrics to measure success, and a process to monitor.

Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Research & Tools

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Storyboard – Use this presentation to select a partner to best fit your sourcing needs and deliver long-term value.

This project helps select a partner for sourcing of your development team so that you can realize the benefits from changing your sourcing strategy.

  • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Storyboard

2. Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation Template – Use this template to build a presentation to detail your decision on a sourcing partner for your development team.

This presentation template is designed to capture the results from the exercises within the storyboard and allow users to build a presentation to leadership showing how selection was done.

  • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation Template

3. Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation Example – Use this as a completed example of the template.

This presentation template portrays what the completed template looks like by showing sample data in all tables. It allows members to see how each exercise leads to the final selection of a partner.

  • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Example Template
[infographic]

Further reading

Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Application Development Team

Choose the right partner to enable your firm to maximize the value realized from your sourcing strategy.

Analyst Perspective

Selecting the right partner for your sourcing needs is no longer a cost-based exercise. Driving long-term value comes from selecting the partner who best matches your firm on a wide swath of factors and fits your needs like a glove.

Sourcing in the past dealt with a different kind of conversation involving two key questions:

Where will the work be done?

How much will it cost?

How people think about sourcing has changed significantly. People are focused on gaining a partner, and not just a vendor to execute a single transaction. They will add skills your team lacks, and an ability to adapt to your changing needs, all while ensuring you operate within any constraints based on your business.

Selecting a sourcing partner is a matching exercise that requires you to look deep into yourself, understand key factors about your firm, and then seek the partner who best meets your profile.

The image contains a picture of Dr. Suneel Ghei.

Dr. Suneel Ghei
Principal Research Director, Application Development
Info-Tech Research Group

Executive Summary

Your Challenge

Common Obstacles

Info-Tech’s Approach

  • You have identified that a change to your sourcing strategy is required based on market and company factors.
  • You are ready to select a new sourcing partner to drive innovation, time to market, increased quality, and improve financial performance.
  • Taking on a new partner is a significant investment and risk, and you must get it right the first time.
  • You need to make a change now to avoid falling further behind your performance targets and your market, and losing clients.

Almost half of all sourcing initiatives do not realize the projected savings, and the biggest reason is the choice of partner.

The market for Application Development partners has become more diverse, increasing choice and the risk of making a costly mistake by choosing the wrong partner.

Firms struggle with how best to support the sourcing partner and allocate resources with the right skills to maximize success, increasing the cost and time to implement, and limiting benefits.

Making the wrong choice means inferior products, and higher costs and losing both clients and reputation.

  • Choosing the right sourcing partner is a four-step process:
  1. Assess your company's skills and processes in the key areas of risk to sourcing initiatives.
  2. Based on the current situation, define a profile for the matching sourcing partner.
  3. Seek matching partners from the market, either in terms of vendor partners or in terms of sourcing locations.
  4. Based on your choice of partner, build a plan to implement the partnership, and define metrics to measure success and a process to monitor.

Info-Tech Insight

Successfully selecting a sourcing partner is not a simple RFP exercise to choose the lowest cost. It is a complex process of introspection, detailed examination of partners and locations, and matching the fit. It requires you to seek a partner that is the Yin to your Yang, and failure is not an option.

You need a new source for development resources

You are facing immediate challenges that require a new approach to development resourcing.

  • Your firm is under fire; you are facing pressures financially from clients and your competitors.
  • Your pace of innovation and talent sourcing is too slow and too limiting.
  • Your competition is moving faster and your clients are considering their options.
  • Revenues and costs of development are trending in the wrong direction.
  • You need to act now to avoid spiraling further.

Given how critical our applications are to the business and our clients, there is no room for error in choosing our partner.

A study of 121 firms outsourcing various processes found that 50% of those surveyed saw no gains from the outsourcing arrangement, so it is critical to make the right choice the first time.

Source: Zhang et al

Big challenges await you on the journey

The road to improving sourcing has many potholes.

  • In a study of 121 firms who moved development offshore, almost 50% of all outsourcing and offshoring initiatives do not achieve the desired results.
  • In another study focused on large corporations, it was shown that 70% of respondents saw negative outcomes from offshoring development.
  • Globalization of IT Services and the ability to work from anywhere have contributed to a significant increase in the number of development firms to choose from.
  • Choosing and implementing a new partner is costly, and the cost of choosing the wrong partner and then trying to correct your course is significant in dollars and reputation:
    • Costs to find a new partner and transition
    • Lost revenue due to product issues
    • Loss of brand and reputation due to poor choice
  • The wrong choice can also cost you in terms of your own resources, increasing the risk of losing more knowledge and skills.

A survey of 25 large corporate firms that outsourced development offshore found that 70% of them had negative outcomes.

(Source: University of Oregon Applied Information Management, 2019)

Info-Tech’s approach

Selecting the right partner is a matching exercise.

Selecting the right partner is a complex exercise with many factors

  1. Look inward. Assess your culture, your skills, and your needs.
  • Market
  • People
  • Culture
  • Technical aspects
  • Create a profile for the perfect partner to fit your firm.
    • Sourcing Strategy
    • Priorities
    • Profile
  • Find the partner that best fits your needs
    • Define RFx
    • Target Partners
    • Evaluate
  • Implement the partner and put in metrics and process to manage.
    • Contract Partner
    • Develop Goals
    • Create Process and Metrics

    The Info-Tech difference:

    1. Assess your own organization’s characteristics and capabilities in four key areas.
    2. Based on these characteristics and the sourcing strategy you are seeking to implement, build a profile for your perfect partner.
    3. Define an RFx and assessment matrix to survey the market and select the best partner.
    4. Implement the partner with process and controls to manage the relationship, built collaboratively and in place day 1.

    Insight summary

    Overarching insight

    Successfully selecting a sourcing partner is not a simple RFP exercise to choose the lowest cost. It is a complex process of introspection, detailed examination of partners and locations, and matching the fit. It requires you to seek a partner that is the Yin to your Yang, and failure is not an option.

    Phase 1 insight

    Fitting each of these pieces to the right partner is key to building a long-term relationship of value.

    Selecting a partner requires you to look at your firm in depth from a business, technical, and organizational culture perspective.

    Phase 2 insight

    The factors we have defined serve to build us a profile for the ideal partner to engage in sourcing our development team. This profile will lead us to be able to define our RFP / RFI and assess respondents.

    Phase 3/4 insight

    Implement the relationship the same way you want it to work, as one team. Work together on contract mechanism, shared goals, metrics, and performance measurement. By making this transparent you hasten the development of a joint team, which will lead to long-term success.

    Tactical insight

    Ensure you assess not just where you are but where you are going, in choosing a partner. For example, you must consider future markets you might enter when choosing the right sourcing, or outsourcing location to maintain compliance.

    Tactical insight

    Sourcing is not a replacement for your full team. Skills must be maintained in house as well, so the partner must be willing to work with the in-house team to share knowledge and collaborate on deliverables.

    Addressing the myth – Single country offshoring or outsourcing

    Research shows that a multi-country approach has a higher chance of success.

    • Research shows that firms trying their own captive development centers fail 20% of the time. ( Journal of Information Technology, 2008)
    • Further, the overall cost of ownership for an offshore center has shown to be significantly higher than the cost of outsourcing, as the offshore center requires more internal management and leadership.
    • Research shows that offshoring requires the offshore location to also house business team members to allow key relationships to be built and ensure more access to expertise. (Arxiv, 2021)
    • Given the specificity of employment laws, cultural differences, and leadership needs, it is very beneficial to have a Corporate HR presence in countries where an offshore center is being set up. (Arxiv, 2021)
    • Lastly, given the changing climate on security, geopolitical changes, and economic factors, our research with service providers and corporate clients shows a need to have more diversity in provider location than a single center can provide.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Long-term success of sourcing requires more than a development center. It requires a location that houses business and HR staff to enable the new development team to learn and succeed.

    Addressing the myth – Outsourcing is a simple RFP for skills and lowest cost

    Success in outsourcing is an exercise in finding a match based on complex factors.

    • In the past, outsourcing was a simple RFP exercise to find the cheapest country with the skills.
    • Our research shows this is no longer true; the decision is now more complex.
    • Competition has driven costs higher, while time business integration and security constraints have served to limit the markets available.
    • Company culture fit is key to the ability to work as one team, which research shows is a key element in delivery of long-term value. (University of Oregon, 2019).
    • These are some of the many factors that need to be considered as you choose your outsourcing partner.
    • The right decision is to find the vendor that best matches the current state of your culture, meets your market constraints, and will allow for best integration to your team – it's not about cheapest or pure skills. (IEEE Access, 2020)

    Info-Tech Insight

    Finding the right outsourcing vendor is an exercise in knowing yourself and then finding the best match to align with your key traits. It's not just costs and skills, but the partner who best matches with your ability to mitigate the risks of outsourcing.

    Phase 1

    Look inward to gain insight on key factors

    Introspection

    1.1 Assess your market factors

    1.2 Determine your people factors

    1.3 Review your current culture

    1.4 Document your technical factors

    Profiling

    2.1 Recall your sourcing strategy

    2.2 Prioritize your company factors

    2.3 Create target profile

    Partner selection

    3.1 Review your RFx

    3.2 Identify target vendors

    3.3 Evaluate vendor

    responses

    Implementation

    4.1 Engage partner to choose contract mechanism

    4.2 Engage partner team to define goals

    4.3 Choose your success

    metrics

    This phase will walk you through assessing and documenting the key driving factors about your firm and the current situation.

    By defining these factors, you will be able to apply this information in the matching process to select the best fit in a partner.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    Line of Business leaders

    Technology leaders

    Key criteria to assess your firm

    Research shows firms must assess themselves in different areas.

    Market factors

    • Who are your clients and your competitors, and what legal constraints do you face?

    People / Process factors

    • What employee skills are you seeking, what is your maturity in product management and stakeholder engagement, and what languages are spoken most predominantly?

    Cultural factors

    • What is your culture around communications, collaboration, change management, and conflict resolution?

    Technical factors

    • What is your current / future technical platform, and what is the maturity of your applications?

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    When assessing these areas, consider where you are today and where you want to go tomorrow, as choosing a partner is a long-term endeavor.

    Step 1.1

    Assess your market factors

    Activities

    1.1.1 Review your client list and future projections to determine your market factors.

    1.1.2 Review your competitive analysis to determine your competitive factors

    This step involves the following participants:

    Business leaders

    Product Owners

    Technology leaders

    Outcomes of this step

    Details of key market factors that will drive the selection of the right partner.

    Market factors

    The Market has a lot to say about the best match for your application development partner.

    Research in the space has defined key market-based factors that are critical when selecting a partner.

    1. Market sectors you service or plan to service – This is critical, as many market sectors have constraints on where their data can be accessed or stored. These restrictions also change over time, so they must be consistently reviewed.
    • E.g. Canadian government data must be stored and only accessed in Canada.
    • E.g. US Government contracts require service providers to avoid certain countries.
  • Your competitors – Your competitors can often seize on differences and turn them to differentiators; for example, offshoring to certain countries can be played up as a risk by a competitor who does all their work in a particular country.
  • Your clients – Research shows that clients can have very distinct views on services being performed in certain countries due to perceived risk, culture, and geopolitical factors. Understanding the views of major clients on globalization of services is a key factor in maintaining client satisfaction.
  • Info-Tech Insight

    Understanding your current and future market factors ensure that your business can not only be successful with the chosen partner today, but also in the future.

    1.1.1 Assess your market factors

    30 min

    Market factors

    1. Group your current client list into three categories:
      1. Those that have no restrictions on data security, privacy or location.
      2. Those that ask for assurances on data security, privacy and location.
      3. Those clients who have compliance restrictions related to data security, privacy, and location.
    2. Categorize future markets into the same three categories.
    3. Based on revenue projections, estimate the revenue from each category as a percentage of your total revenue.

    Download the Select a Sourcing Partner Presentation Template

    Input Output
    • Current client list
    • Future market plans
    • Competitive analysis
    • Completion of the Market Factors chart in the Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team template
    Materials Participants
    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation template
    • Technology leaders
    • Product owners
    • Line of business leaders
    • Finance leaders

    Assess your market factors

    Market and sector

    Market share and constraints

    Market category

    Sector – Public, private or both

    Market share of category

    Key areas of concern

    Not constrained by data privacy, security or location

    Private

    50%

    Require assurances on data security, privacy or location

    Public

    45%

    Data access

    Have constraints that preclude choices related to data security, privacy and location

    Public

    5%

    Data residency

    1.1.2 Review your competitive factors

    30 min

    Competitive factors

    1. List your largest competitors.
    2. Document their sourcing strategies for their development team – are they all onshore or nearshore? Do they outsource?
    3. Based on this, identify competitive threats based on changing sourcing strategies.

    Download the Select a Sourcing Partner Presentation Template

    Input Output
    • Current client list
    • Future market plans
    • Competitive analysis
    • Completion of the Market Factors chart in the Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team template
    Materials Participants
    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation template
    • Technology leaders
    • Product owners
    • Line of business leaders
    • Finance leaders

    Review your competitive factors

    Competitors

    Competitor sourcing strategy

    Competitive threats

    Competitor

    Where is the market?

    Is this onshore / near shore / offshore?

    Data residency

    How could competitors take advantage of a change in our sourcing strategy?

    Competitor X

    Canada / US

    All work done in house and onshore

    Kept in Canada / US

    If we source offshore, we will face a Made in Canada / US threat

    Step 1.2

    Consider your people-related factors

    Activities

    1.2.1 Define your people factors

    1.2.2 Assess your process factors

    This step involves the following participants:

    Technical leaders

    Outcomes of this step

    Details of key people factors that will drive the selection of the right partner.

    People / process factors

    People and process have a large hand in the success or failure of a partner relationship.

    • Alignment of people and process are critical to the success of the partner relationship over the long term.
    • In research on outsourcing / offshoring, Rahman et al identified ten factors that directly impact success or failure in offshoring or outsourcing of development.
    • Key among them are the following:
      • Employee skills
      • Project management
      • Maturity of process concerning product and client management
      • Language barrier

    Info-Tech Insight

    People are a critical resource in any sourcing strategy. Making sure the people and the processes will mesh seamlessly is how to ensure success.

    1.2.1 Define your people factors

    30 min

    Skills Inventory

    1. List skills needed in the development team to service current needs.
    2. Based on future innovation and product direction, add skills you foresee needing in the next 12-24 months. Where do you see a new technology platform (e.g. move from .NET to Java) or innovation (addition of Mobile)?
    3. List current skills present in the team.
    4. Identify skills gaps.

    Download the Select a Sourcing Partner Presentation Template

    InputOutput
    • Product plans for current and future products
    • Technology platform plans for current products
    • Future innovation plans
    • People- and process-related factors that influence sourcing decisions
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation template
    • Technology leaders
    • Product owners
    • Solution architects

    Assess your people - Skills inventory

    Skills required

    Strategic value

    Skills present

    Skill you are seeking

    Required today or in the future

    Rate the skill level required in this area

    Is this a strategic focus for the firm for future targets?

    Is this skill present in the team today?

    Rate current skill level (H/M/L)

    Java Development

    Future

    High

    Yes

    No

    Low

    .Net Development

    Today

    Med

    No

    Yes

    High

    1.2.2 Assess your process factors

    30 min

    Process factors

    1. Do you have a defined product ownership practice?
    2. How mature is the product ownership for the product you are seeking to change sourcing for (H/M/L)?
    3. Do you have project management principles and governance in place for software releases?
    4. What is the relative maturity / skill in the areas you are seeking sourcing for (H/M/L)?

    Download the Select a Sourcing Partner Presentation Template

    InputOutput
    • Product plans for current and future products
    • Technology platform plans for current products
    • Future innovation plans
    • People- and process-related factors that influence sourcing decisions
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation template
    • Technology leaders
    • Product owners
    • Solution architects

    Assess your process factors

    Product ownership

    Project management

    Product where sourcing is being changed

    Product ownership in place?

    Skills / maturity rating (H/M/L)

    Project management / governance in place for software releases

    Rate current maturity / skill level (H/M/L)

    ABC

    Yes

    High

    Yes

    High

    SQW

    No

    Low

    Yes

    High

    Step 1.3

    Review your current culture

    Activities

    1.3.1 Assess your communications factors

    1.3.2 Assess your conflict resolution factors

    This step involves the following participants:

    Technical leaders

    Product owners

    Project managers

    Outcomes of this step

    Details of key culture factors that will drive the selection of the right partner.

    Cultural factors

    Organization culture fit is a driver of collaboration between the teams, which drives success.

    • In their study of country attractiveness for sourcing development, Kotlarsky and Oshri point to the ability of the client and their sourcing partner to work as one team as a key to success.
    • This requires synergies in many cultural factors to avoid costly miscommunications and misinterpretations that damage collaboration.
    • Key factors in achieving this are:
      • Communications methodology and frequency; managing and communicating to the teams as one team vs two, and communicating at all levels, vs top down.
      • Managing the team as one integrated team, with collaboration enabled between all resources, rather than the more adversarial client vs partner approach.
      • Conflict resolution strategies must align so all members of the extended team work together to resolve conflict vs the traditional “Blame the Contractors”.
      • Strong change management is required to keep all team members aligned.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Synergy of culture is what enables a good partner selection to become a long-term relationship of value.

    1.3.1 Assess your communications factors

    30 min

    1. List all the methods you use to communicate with your development team – face to face, email, conference call, written.
    2. For each form of communication confirm frequency, medium, and audience (team vs one-on-one)
    3. Confirm if these communications take into account External vs Internal resources and different time zones, languages, and cultures.
    4. Is your development team broken up into teams by function, by location, by skill, etc., or do you operate as one team?

    Download the Select a Sourcing Partner Presentation Template

    Input Output
    • Communication process with existing development team
    • Examples of how external staff have been integrated into the process
    • Examples of conflicts and how they were resolved
    • Documentation of key cultural characteristics that need to be part of provider profiling
    Materials Participants
    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation template
    • Technology leaders
    • Product owners
    • Project managers

    Assess your communications strategy

    Communications

    Type

    Frequency

    Audience

    One communication or one per audience?

    Level of two-way dialogue

    Face-to-face team meetings

    Weekly

    All developers

    One

    High

    Daily standup

    Daily

    Per team

    One per audience

    Low

    1.3.2 Assess your conflict resolution factors

    30 min

    1. How does your organization handle the following types of conflict? Rate from 1-5, with 1 being hierarchical and 5 being openly collaborative.
      1. Developers on a team disagree.
      2. Development team disagrees with manager.
      3. Development team disagrees with product owner.
      4. Development team disagrees with line of business.
    2. Rate each conflict resolution strategy based on effectiveness.
    3. Confirm if this type of strategy is used for internal and external resources, or internal only.

    Download the Select a Sourcing Partner Presentation Template

    InputOutput
    • Communication process with existing development team
    • Examples of how external staff have been integrated into the process
    • Examples of conflicts and how they were resolved
    • Documentation of key cultural characteristics that need to be part of provider profiling
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation template
    • Technology leaders
    • Product owners
    • Project managers

    Assess your conflict resolution strategy

    Conflict

    Resolution strategy

    Effectiveness

    Audience

    Conflict type

    Rate the resolution strategy from hierarchical to collaborative (1-5)

    How effective is this method of resolution from 1-5?

    Is this strategy used for external parties as well as internal?

    Developer to product owner

    44

    Yes

    Developer to manager

    12

    Yes

    Step 1.4

    Document your technical factors

    Activities

    1.4.1 Document your product / platform factors

    1.4.2 Document your environment details

    This step involves the following participants:

    Technical leaders

    Product owners

    Outcomes of this step

    Details of key technical factors that will drive the selection of the right partner.

    Technical factors

    Technical factors are still the foundation for a Development sourcing relationship.

    • While there are many organizational factors to consider, the matching of technological factors is still the root on which the sourcing relationship is built; the end goal is to build better software.
    • Key technical Items that need to be aligned based on the research are:
      • Technical infrastructure
      • Development environments
      • Development methodology and tools
      • Deployment methodology and tools
      • Lack of/poor-quality technical documentation
    • Most RFPs focus purely on skills, but without alignment on the above items, work becomes impossible to move forward quickly, limiting the chances of success.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Technical factors are the glue that enables teams to function together. Ensuring that they are fully integrated is what enables team integration; seams in that integration represent failure points.

    1.4.1 Document your product / platform factors

    30 mins

    1. How many environments does each software release go through from the start of development through release to production?
    2. What is the infrastructure and development platform?

    Download the Select a Sourcing Partner Presentation Template

    InputOutput
    • Development process
    • Deployment process
    • Operations process
    • IT security policies
    • Documentation of key technical characteristics that need to be part of provider profiling
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation template
    • Development leaders
    • Deployment team leaders
    • Infrastructure leaders
    • IT operations leaders
    • Product owners
    • Project managers

    Document your product / platform

    Product / Platform

    Product you are seeking a sourcing solution for

    What is the current infrastructure platform?

    How many environments does the product pass through?

    What is the current development toolset?

    ABC

    Windows

    Dev – QA – Preprod - Prod

    .Net / Visual Studio

    1.4.2 Document your environment details

    30 min

    For each environment detail the following:

    1. Environment on premises or in cloud
    2. Access allowed to external parties
    3. Production data present and unmasked
    4. Deployment process: automated or manual
    5. Tools used for automated deployment
    6. Can the environment be restored to last known state automatically?
    7. Does documentation exist on the environment, processes and procedures?

    Download the Select a Sourcing Partner Presentation Template

    InputOutput
    • Development process
    • Deployment process
    • Operations process
    • IT security policies
    • Documentation of key technical characteristics that need to be part of provider profiling
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation template
    • Development leaders
    • Deployment team leaders
    • Infrastructure leaders
    • IT operations leaders
    • Product owners
    • Project managers

    Document Your Environment Details

    Environment

    Location

    Access

    Deployment

    Data

    Name of Environment

    Is the environment on premises or in the cloud (which cloud)?

    Is external access allowed?

    Is deployment automated or manual?

    Tool used for deployment

    Is reset automated?

    Does the environment contain unmasked production data?

    Dev

    Cloud

    Yes

    Automated

    Azure DevOps

    Yes

    No

    QA

    Cloud

    Yes

    Automated

    Azure DevOps

    Yes

    No

    Preprod

    On Premises

    No

    Manual

    N/A

    No

    Yes

    Phase 2

    Introspection

    1.1 Assess your market factors

    1.2 Determine your people factors

    1.3 Review your current culture

    1.4 Document your technical factors

    Profiling

    2.1 Recall your sourcing strategy

    2.2 Prioritize your company factors

    2.3 Create target profile

    Partner selection

    3.1 Review your RFx

    3.2 Identify target vendors

    3.3 Evaluate vendor

    responses

    Implementation

    4.1 Engage partner to choose contract mechanism

    4.2 Engage partner team to define goals

    4.3 Choose your success

    metrics

    This phase will help you to build a profile of the partner you should target in your search for a sourcing partner.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    Technology leaders

    Procurement leaders

    Product owners

    Project managers

    Build a profile for the right partner

    • Finding the perfect partner is a puzzle to solve, an exercise between the firm and the partners.
    • It is necessary to be able to prioritize and to identify opportunities where you can adapt to create a fit.
    • You must also bring forward the sourcing model you are seeking and prioritize factors based on that; for example, if you are seeking a nearshore partner, language may be less of a factor.

    Review factors based on sourcing choice

    Different factors are more important depending on whether you are insourcing or outsourcing.

    Key risks for insourcing

    • Alignment on communication strategy and method
    • Ability to align culturally
    • Need for face-to-face relationship building
    • Need for coaching skills

    Key risks for outsourcing

    • Giving control to the vendor
    • Legal and regulatory issues
    • Lack of knowledge at the vendor
    • Language and cultural fit

    Assessing your firm's position

    • The model you derived from the Sourcing Strategy research will inform the prioritization of factors for matching partners.

    Info-Tech Insight

    To find the best location for insourcing, or the best vendor for outsourcing, you need to identify your firm's positions on key risk areas.

    Step 2.1

    Recall your sourcing strategy

    Activities

    2.1.1 Define the key factors in your sourcing strategy

    This step involves the following participants:

    Technology Leaders

    Outcomes of this step

    Documentation of the Sourcing Strategy you arrived at in the Define a Sourcing Strategy exercises

    Choosing the right model

    The image contains a screenshot of the legend that will be used down below. The legend contains circles, from the left there is a empty circle, a one quarter filled circle, half filled circle, three-quarter filled circle , and a fully filled in circle.

    Determinant

    Key Questions to Ask

    Onshore

    Nearshore

    Offshore

    Outsource role(s)

    Outsource team

    Outsource product(s)

    Business dependence

    How much do you rely on business resources during the development cycle?

    The image contains a screenshot of the filled in whole circle to demonstrate high. The image contains a screenshot of the three-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium high. The image contains a screenshot of the one-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium low. The image contains a screenshot of the half filled circle to demonstrate medium. The image contains a screenshot of the one-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium low. The image contains a screenshot of the empty circle to demonstrate low.

    Absorptive capacity

    How successful has the organization been at bringing outside knowledge back into the firm?

    The image contains a screenshot of the empty circle to demonstrate low. The image contains a screenshot of the one-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium low. The image contains a screenshot of the one-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium low. The image contains a screenshot of the half filled circle to demonstrate medium. The image contains a screenshot of the one-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium low. The image contains a screenshot of the filled in whole circle to demonstrate high.

    Integration complexity

    How many integrations are required for the product to function – fewer than 5, 5-10, or more than 10?

    The image contains a screenshot of the filled in whole circle to demonstrate high. The image contains a screenshot of the three-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium high. The image contains a screenshot of the three-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium high. The image contains a screenshot of the half filled circle to demonstrate medium. The image contains a screenshot of the one-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium low. The image contains a screenshot of the empty circle to demonstrate low.

    Product ownership

    Do you have full-time product owners in place for the products? Do product owners have control of their roadmaps?

    The image contains a screenshot of the one-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium low. The image contains a screenshot of the half filled circle to demonstrate medium. The image contains a screenshot of the three-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium high. The image contains a screenshot of the half filled circle to demonstrate medium. The image contains a screenshot of the filled in whole circle to demonstrate high. The image contains a screenshot of the filled in whole circle to demonstrate high.

    Organization culture fit

    What are your organization’s communication and conflict resolution strategies? Is your organization geographically dispersed?

    The image contains a screenshot of the one-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium low. The image contains a screenshot of the one-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium low. The image contains a screenshot of the three-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium high. The image contains a screenshot of the one-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium low. The image contains a screenshot of the three-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium high. The image contains a screenshot of the filled in whole circle to demonstrate high.

    Vendor mgmt skills

    What is your skill level in vendor management? How old are your longest-standing vendor relationships?

    The image contains a screenshot of the empty circle to demonstrate low. The image contains a screenshot of the one-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium low. The image contains a screenshot of the one-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium low. The image contains a screenshot of the half filled circle to demonstrate medium. The image contains a screenshot of the three-quarter filled circle to demonstrate medium high. The image contains a screenshot of the filled in whole circle to demonstrate high.

    2.1.1 Define the key factors in your sourcing strategy

    30 min

    For each product you are seeking a sourcing strategy for, document the following:

    1. Product or team name.
    2. Sourcing strategy based on Define a Sourcing Strategy.
    3. The primary drivers that led to this selection – Business Dependence, Absorptive Capacity, Integration Complexity, Product Ownership, Culture or Vendor Management.
    4. The reasoning for the selection based on that factor – e.g. we chose nearshoring based on high business dependence by our development team.

    Download the Select a Sourcing Partner Presentation Template

    Input Output
    • Sourcing Strategy from Define a Sourcing Strategy for your Development Team
    • Reasoning that drove the sourcing strategy selection
    Materials Participants
    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation template
    • Technology leadership

    Define sourcing strategy factors

    Sourcing strategy

    Factors that led to selection

    Product you are seeking a sourcing solution for

    Strategy defined

    Key factors that led to that choice

    Reasoning

    ABC

    Outsourcing - Offshore

    • Product ownership
    • Business integration
    • Product maturity
    • Technical environment

    Mature product ownership and low requirement for direct business involvement.

    Mature product with lower environments in cloud.

    Step 2.2

    Prioritize your company factors

    Activities

    2.2.1 Prioritize the factors from your sourcing strategy and confirm if mitigation or adaptation are possible.

    This step involves the following participants:

    IT Leadership team

    Outcomes of this step

    Prioritized list of key factors

    2.2.1 Prioritize your sourcing strategy factors

    30 min

    1. For each of the factors listed in exercise 2.1, prioritize them by importance to the firm.
    2. For each factor, please confirm if there is room to drive change internally to overcome the lack of a match – for example, if the culture being changed in language and conflict resolution is an option, then say Yes for that factor.

    Download the Select a Sourcing Partner Presentation Template

    InputOutput
    • Sourcing Strategy factors from 2.1
    • Prioritized list of sourcing strategy factors
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation template
    • Technology leaders

    Sourcing strategy factors and priority

    Sourcing strategy

    Factors that led to selection

    Priority of factor in decision

    Change possible

    Product you are seeking a sourcing solution for

    Strategy defined

    Key factors that led to your choice

    Reasoning

    Priority of factor 1-x

    Is there an opportunity to adapt this factor to a partner?

    ABC

    Outsourcing - offshore

    • Product ownership
    • Business integration
    • Product maturity
    • Technical environment

    Mature product ownership

    Low requirement for direct business involvement

    Mature product with lower environments in cloud

    2

    1

    3

    N

    N

    Y

    Step 2.3

    Create target profile

    Activities

    2.3.1 Profile your best fit

    This step involves the following participants:

    IT Leadership team

    Outcomes of this step

    Profile of the target partner

    Profiling your best fit

    Creating a target profile will help you determine which partners should be included in the process.

    Given the complexity of all the factors and trying to find the best fit from a multitude of partners, Info-Tech recommends forming a target profile for your best fit of partner.

    This profile provides a detailed assessment matrix to use to review potential partners.

    Profile should be created based on priority; "must haves" are high priority, while properties that have mitigation opportunities are optional or lower priority.

    Criteria

    Priority

    Some US Govt contracts – data and staff in NATO

    1

    Windows environment – Azure DEVOPS

    2

    Clients in FS

    3

    Agile SDLC

    4

    Collaborative communication and conflict resolution

    5

    Mature product management

    6

    Languages English and Spanish

    7

    Partner Profile

    • Teams in NATO and non-NATO countries
    • Windows skills with Azure
    • Financial Services experience
    • Utilize Agile and willing to plug into our teams
    • Used to collaborating with clients in one team environment
    • One centre in Latin / South America

    Info-Tech Insight

    The factors we have defined serve to build us a profile for the ideal partner to engage in sourcing our development team. This profile will lead us to be able to define our RFP / RFI and assess respondents.

    Case study: Cognizant is partnering with clients on product development

    INDUSTRY: Technology Services

    SOURCE: Interview with Jay MacIsaac, Cognizant

    Cognizant is driving quality solutions for clients

    • Strives to be primarily an industry-aligned organization that delivers multiple service lines in multiple geographies.
    • Seeks to carefully consider client culture to create one team.
    • Value proposition is a consultative approach bringing thought leadership and mutually adding value to the relationship vs the more traditional order taker development partner
    • Wants to share in solution development to facilitate shared successes. Geographic alignment drives knowledge of the client and their challenges, not just about time zone and supportability.
    • Offers one of the largest offshore capabilities in the world, supported by local and nearshore resources to drive local knowledge.
    • Realizes today’s clients don’t typically want a black box, they are sophisticated and want transparency around the process and solution, to have a partner.
    • Understands that clients do want to know where the work is being delivered from and how it's being delivered, and want to help manage expectations and overall risk.

    Synergy with Info-Tech’s approach

    • Best relationship comes when teams operate as one.
    • Clients are seeking value, not a development black box.
    • Clients want to have a partner they can engage with, not just an order taker.
    • Goal is a one-team culture with shared goals and delivering business value.
    • Ideal is a partner that will add to their thinking, not echo it.

    Results of this approach

    • Cognizant is continuing to deliver double-digit growth and continues to strive for top quartile performance.
    • Growth in the client base has seen the company grow to over 340,000 associates worldwide.

    Case study: Cabot Technology Solutions uses industry knowledge to drive successful partnerships

    INDUSTRY: Technology Services

    SOURCE: Interview with Shibu Basheer, Cabot Technology Solutions

    Cabot Technology Solutions findings

    • Cabot Technology Solutions looks to partner with clients and deliver expertise and value, not just application development.
      • Focus on building deep knowledge in their chosen vertical, Healthcare.
      • Focus on partnering with clients in this space who are seeking a partner to provide industry knowledge and use this to propel them forward.
      • Look to work with clients seeking a one team philosophy.
      • Avoid clients looking for a cheap provider.
    • Recognizing the initial apprehension to India as a location, they have built a practice in Ontario that serves as a bridge for their offshore team.
    • Cabot overcame initial views and built trust, while integrating the India team in parallel.

    Synergy with Info-Tech approach

    • Preference is partners, not a client/vendor relationship.
    • Single country model is set aside in favor of mix of near and offshore.
    • Culture is a one team approach, not the more adversarial order-taker approach.
    • Goal is to build long-term relationships of value, not task management.

    Results of this approach

    • Cabot is a recognized as a top software development company in many markets across the USA.
    • Cabot continues to drive growth and build referenceable client relationships across North America.

    2.3.1 Profile your best fit

    30 min

    1. Document the list of skills you are seeking from the People Factors – Skills Inventory in Section 1.2 – these represent the skills you are seeking in a partner.
    2. Document the culture you are looking for in a partner with respect to communications and conflict resolution in the culture section of the requirements – this comes from Section 1.3.
    3. Confirm the type of partner you are seeking – nearshore, offshore, or outsourcing based on the sourcing strategy priorities in Section 2.2.
    4. Confirm constraints that the partner must work under based on constraints from your market and competitor factors in Section 1.1.
    5. Confirm your technical requirements in terms of environments, tools, and processes that the vendor must align to from Section 1.4.

    Download the Select a Sourcing Partner Presentation Template

    Input Output

    All exercises done in Steps 11-1.4 and 2.1-2.2

    Profile of a target partner to drive the RFx Criteria

    Materials Participants

    Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation template

    Development leaders

    Deployment team leaders

    Infrastructure leaders

    IT operations leaders

    Product owners

    Project managers

    RFP skills requirement

    People skills required

    Product ownership

    Project management

    Skill

    Skill level required

    Tools / platform requirement

    Details of product management methodology and skills

    Details of firm's project management methodology

    .NET

    Medium

    Windows

    Highly mature, high skill

    Highly mature, high skill

    Java

    High

    Windows

    Low

    High

    RFx cultural characteristics

    Communication strategy

    Conflict resolution

    Organization / management

    Communication mediums supported

    Frequency of meetings expected

    Conflict resolutions strategies used at the firm

    Management methodology

    Face to face

    Weekly

    Collaborative

    Online

    Daily

    Hierarchical with manager

    Hierarchical

    RFx market constraints

    Constraints

    Partner proposal

    Constraint type

    Restrictions

    Market size required for

    Reasoning

    Data residency

    Data must stay in Canada for Canadian Gov't clients

    5% Canada public sector

    Competitive

    Offshoring dev means competition can take advantage

    95% Clients

    Need strategy to show data and leadership in NA, but delivering more innovation at lower cost by going offshore

    RFx technical requirements

    Technical environments

    Infrastructure

    Alignment of SDLC

    Tools required for development team

    Access control software required

    Infrastructure location

    Number of environments from development to production

    .Net Visual Studio

    Microsoft

    Azure

    4

    RFx scope of services

    Work being sourced

    Team sizing

    Work being sourced

    Skill level required

    Average size of release

    Releases per year

    Java development of new product

    High

    3-month development

    6

    .NET staff augmentation

    Medium

    ½-month development

    12

    Phase 3

    Choose the partner that will best enable you to move forward as one integrated team.

    Introspection

    1.1 Assess your market factors

    1.2 Determine your people factors

    1.3 Review your current culture

    1.4 Document your technical factors

    Profiling

    2.1 Recall your sourcing strategy

    2.2 Prioritize your company factors

    2.3 Create target profile

    Partner selection

    3.1 Review your RFx

    3.2 Identify target vendors

    3.3 Evaluate vendor

    responses

    Implementation

    4.1 Engage partner to choose contract mechanism

    4.2 Engage partner team to define goals

    4.3 Choose your success

    metrics

    For more details on Partner Selection, please refer to our research blueprint entitled Select an ERP Partner

    This phase will help you define your RFx for your provider search

    This phase involves the following participants:

    Vendor Management Team

    IT Leadership

    Finance Team

    Finding the right fit should always come before rates to determine value

    The right fit

    Determined in previous activities

    Negotiating will eventually bring the two together

    Value

    Rates

    Determined by skill and location

    Statement of Work (SOW) quality

    A quality SOW is the result of a quality RFI/RFP (RFx).

    The process up to now has been gathering the materials needed to build a quality RFx. Take this opportunity to review the outputs of the preceding activities to ensure that:

    • All the right stake holders have been engaged.
    • The requirements are complete.

    Info-Tech’s RFP Review as a Service looks for key items to ensure your RFx will generate quality responses and SOWs.

    • Is it well-structured with a consistent use of fonts and bullets?
    • Is it laid out in sections that are easily identifiable and progress from high-level to more detailed information?
    • Can a vendor quickly identify the ten (or fewer) things that are most important to you?

    The image contains a screenshot of the Request for Proposal Review as a Service.

    Step 3.1

    Review your RFx

    Activities

    3.1.1 Select your RFx template

    3.1.2 Finalize your RFx

    3.1.3 Weight each evaluation criteria

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project team
    • Evaluation team
    • Vendor management team
    • CIO

    Outcomes of this step

    • Completed RFx

    Info-Tech’s RFI/RFP process

    Info-Tech has well-established vendor management templates and practices

    • Identify Need
    • Define Business Requirements
    • Gain Business Authorization
    • Perform RFI/RFP
    • Negotiate Agreement
    • Purchase Goods and Services
    • Assess and Measure Performance

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    You’ll want to customize templates for your organization, but we strongly suggest that you take whatever you feel best meets your needs from both the long- and short-form RFPs presented in this blueprint.

    The secret to managing an RFP is to make it manageable. And the secret to making an RFP manageable is to treat it like any other aspect of business – by developing a process. With a process in place, you are better able to handle whatever comes your way, because you know the steps you need to follow to produce a top-notch RFP.

    Your RFP process should be tailored to fit the needs and specifics of your organization and IT.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Create a better RFP process using Info-Tech’s well-established templates and methodology.

    Create a Better RFP Process

    In a hurry? Consider an enhanced RFI instead of an RFP.

    While many organizations rarely use RFIs, they can be an effective tool in the vendor manager’s toolbox when used at the right time in the right way. RFIs can be deployed in competitive targeted negotiations. An enhanced RFI (ERFI) is a two-stage strategy that speeds up the typical RFP process. The first stage is like an RFI on steroids, and the second stage is targeted competitive negotiation.

    Stage 1:

    Create an RFI with all the customary components. Next, add a few additional RFP-like requirements (e.g. operational and technical requirements). Make sure you include a request for budgetary pricing and provide any significant features and functionality requirements so that the vendors have enough information to propose solutions. In addition, allow the vendors to ask questions through your single point of coordination and share answers with all the vendors. Finally, notify the vendors that you will not be doing an RFP – this is it!

    Stage 2:

    Review the vendors’ proposals and select the best two. Negotiate with both vendors and then make your decision.

    The ERFI shortens the typical RFP process, maintains leverage for your organization, and works great with low- to medium-spend items (however your organization defines them). You’ll get clarification on vendors’ competencies and capabilities, obtain a fair market price, and meet your internal clients’ aggressive timelines while still taking steps to protect your organization.

    RFI Template

    The image contains a screenshot of the RFI Template.

    Use this template to create your RFI baseline template. Be sure to modify and configure the template to your organization’s specifications.

    Request for Information Template

    Long-Form RFP Template

    Configure Info-Tech’s Long-Form RFP Template for major initiatives

    The image contains a screenshot of the long-form RFP Template.

    A long-form or major RFP is an excellent tool for more complex and complicated requirements. This example is for a baseline RFP.

    It starts with best-in-class RFP terms and conditions that are essential to maintaining your control throughout the RFP process. The specific requirements for the business, functional, technical, and pricing areas should be included in the exhibits at the end of the template. That makes it easier to tailor the RFP for each deal, since you and your team can quickly identify specific areas that need modification. Grouping the exhibits together also makes it convenient for both your team to review, and the vendors to respond.

    You can use this sample RFP as the basis for your template RFP, taking it all as is or picking and choosing the sections that best meet the mission and objectives of the RFP and your organization.

    Source: Info-Tech’s The Art of Creating a Quality RFP

    Short-Form RFP Template

    Configure Info-Tech’s Short-Form RFP Template for minor or smaller initiatives

    The image contains a screenshot of the Short-Form RFP Template.

    This example is for a less complex RFP that has relatively basic requirements and perhaps a small window in which the vendors can respond. As with the long-form RFP, exhibits are placed at the end of the RFP, an arrangement that saves time for both your team and the vendors. Of course, the short-form RFP contains fewer specific instructions, guidelines, and rules for vendors’ proposal submissions.

    We find that short-form RFPs are a good choice when you need to use something more than a request for quote (RFQ) but less than an RFP running 20 or more pages. It’s ideal, for example, when you want to send an RFP to only one vendor or to acquire items such as office supplies, contingent labor, or commodity items that require significant vendor's risk assessment.

    Source: The Art of Creating a Quality RFP

    3.1.1 Select your RFx template

    1-3 hours

    1. As a group, download the RFx templates from the previous three slides.
    2. Review your RFx process as a group. Be sure to include the vendor management team.
    3. Be sure to consider organization-specific procurement guidelines. These can be included. The objective here is to find the template that is the best fit. We will finalize the template in the next activity.
    4. Determine the best template for this project.
    Input Output
    • RFx templates
    • The RFx template that will be used for this project
    Materials Participants
    • Info-Tech’s Enhanced RFI Template, Long-Form RFP Template, and Short-Form RFP Template
    • Vendor management team
    • Project team
    • Project manager

    Finalize your RFx

    Key insights

    Leverage the power of the RFP

    • Too often RFPs fail to achieve their intended purposes, and your organization feels the effects of a poorly created RFP for many years.
    • If you are faced with a single source vendor, you can perform an RFP to one to create the competitive leverage.

    Make the response and evaluation process easier

    • Being strategic in your wording and formatting makes it easier on both parties – easier for the vendors to submit meaningful proposals, and easier for customer teams to evaluate.
    • Create a level playing field to encourage competition. Without multiple proposals, your options are limited and your chances for a successful project plummet.

    Maximize the competition

    • Leverage a pre-proposal conference to resolve vendor questions and to ensure all vendors receive the same answers to all questions. No vendor should have an information advantage.

    Do’s

    • Leverage your team’s knowledge.
    • Document and explain your RFP process to stakeholders and vendors.
    • Include contract terms in your RFP.
    • Measure and manage performance after contract award.
    • Seek feedback from the RFP team on your process and improve it as necessary.

    Don'ts

    • Reveal your budget.
    • Do an RFP in a vacuum.
    • Send an RFP to a vendor your team is not willing to award the business to.
    • Hold separate conversations with candidate vendors during your RFP process.
    • Skimp on the requirements definition to speed the process.
    • Tell the vendor they are selected before negotiating.

    3.1.2 Finalize your RFx

    1-3 hours

    1. As a group, review the selected RFI or RFP template.
    2. This is YOUR document. Modify it to suit the needs of the organization and even add sections from the other RFP templates that are relevant to your project.
    3. Use the Supplementary RFx Material as a guide.
    4. Add the content created in Steps 1 and 2.
    5. Add any organization-specific clauses or requirements.
    6. Have the project team review and comment on the RFP.
    7. Optional: Use Info-Tech’s RFP Review Concierge Service.

    Download the RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool

    Download the Supplementary RFx Material

    InputOutput
    • RFx template
    • Organizational specific guidelines
    • Materials from Steps 1 and 2
    • Supplementary RFx Material
    • Finalized RFx
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Electronic RFP document for editing
    • Vendor management team
    • Project team
    • Project manager

    3.1.2 Bring it all together

    Supplementary RFx Material

    The image contains a screenshot of Supplementary RFx Material.

    Review the sample content to get a feel for how to incorporate the results of the activities you have worked through into the RFx template.

    RFx Templates

    Use one of our templates to build a ready-for-distribution implementation partner RFx tailored to the unique success factors of your implementation.

    Exercises in Steps 1 and 2

    The image contains a screenshot of Exercises in Steps 1 and 2

    Use the material gathered during each activity to inform and populate the implementation partner requirements that are specific for your organization and project.

    The image contains a screenshot of the Long Form RFx template.The image contains a screenshot of the Short Form RFx template.

    3.1.3 Weight each evaluation criteria

    1-3 hours

    1. As a group, review the selected RFI or RFP template.
    2. This is your document. Modify it to suit the needs of the organization and even add sections from the other RFP templates that are relevant to your project.
    3. Use the Supplementary RFx Material as a guide.
    4. Utilize the content defined in Steps 1 and 2.
    5. Add any organization-specific clauses or requirements.
    6. Have the project team review and comment on the RFP.
    7. Optional: Use Info-Tech’s RFP Review Concierge Service.

    Download the Supplementary RFx Material

    InputOutput

    RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool

    Exercises from Steps 1 and 2

    • Weighted scoring tool to evaluate responses
    MaterialsParticipants
    • RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool
    • Supplementary RFx Material
    • Vendor management team
    • Project team
    • Project manager

    3.1.3 Apply weight to each evaluation criteria

    Use this tool to weight each critical success factor based on results of the activities within the vendor selection workbook for later scoring results.

    The image contains a screenshot of the RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool.

    Download the RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool

    Step 3.2

    Identify target vendors

    Activities

    3.2.1 Identify target vendors

    3.2.2 Define your RFx timeline

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project team
    • Vendor management team

    Outcomes of this step

    • Targeted vendor list
    • Initial RFx timeline

    3.2.1 Identify target vendors

    1-3 hours

    1. Based on the profile defined in Step 2.3, research potential partners that fit the profile, starting with those you may have used in the past. From this, build your initial list of vendors to target with your RFx.
    2. Break into smaller groups (or continue as a single group if it is already small) and review each shortlisted vendor to see if they will likely respond to the RFx.
    Input Output
    • Websites
    • Peers
    • Advisory groups
    • A shortlist of vendors to target with your RFx
    Materials Participants
    • RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool
    • CIO
    • Vendor management team
    • Project team
    • Evaluation team

    Download the RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool

    Define your RFx timeline

    Provider RFx timelines need to be clearly defined to keep the project and participants on track. These projects and processes can be long. Set yourself up for success by identifying the time frames clearly and communicating them to participants.

    1. Current
    • Concurrent ERP product selection
    • RFx preparation
    • Release of RFX
  • Near-term
    • Responses received
    • Scoring responses
    • Shortlisting providers
    • Provider interviews
    • Provider selection
    • Provider contract negotiations
    • Contract with provider
  • Future
    • Initiation of knowledge transfer
    • Joint development period
    • Cutover to provider team

    89% of roadmap views have at least some representation of time. (Roadmunk, n.d.)

    Info-Tech Insight

    The true value of time horizons is in dividing your timeline and applying different standards and rules, which allows you to speak to different audiences and achieve different communication objectives.

    3.2.2 Define your RFx timeline

    1-3 hours

    1. As a group identify an appropriate timeline for your RFP process. Info-Tech recommends no less than three months from RFx release to contract signing.

      Keep in mind that you need to allow for time to engage the team and perform some level of knowledge transfer, and to seed the team with internal resources for the initial period.
    2. Leave enough time for vendor responses, interviews, and reference checks.
    3. Once the timeline is finalized, document it and communicate it to the organization.

    Download the RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool

    Input Output
    • RFx template
    • Provider RFx timeline
    Materials Participants
    • RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool
    • Vendor management team
    • Project team
    • Project manager

    Define your RFx timeline

    The image contains a screenshot of an example of an RFx timeline.

    Step 3.3

    Evaluate vendor responses

    Activities

    3.3.1 Evaluate responses

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Evaluation team

    Outcomes of this step

    • Vendor submission scores

    3.3.1 Evaluate responses

    1-3 hours

    1. Use the RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool to collect and record the evaluation team's scores for each vendor's response to your RFx.
    2. Then record and compare each team member's scores to rank the vendors' responses.
    3. The higher the score, the closer the fit.

    Download the RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool

    InputOutput
    • Vendor responses
    • Vendor presentations
    • Vendor scores
    MaterialsParticipants
    • RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool
    • Evaluation team

    3.3.1 Score vendor results

    Use the RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool to score the vendors' responses to your RFx using the weighted scale from Activity 3.1.3.

    The image contains a screenshot of the RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool.

    Download the RFx Vendor Evaluation Tool

    Phase 4

    Measuring the new relationship

    Introspection

    1.1 Assess your market factors

    1.2 Determine your people factors

    1.3 Review your current culture

    1.4 Document your technical factors

    Profiling

    2.1 Recall your sourcing strategy

    2.2 Prioritize your company factors

    2.3 Create target profile

    Partner selection

    3.1 Review your RFx

    3.2 Identify target vendors

    3.3 Evaluate vendor

    responses

    Implementation

    4.1 Engage partner to choose contract mechanism

    4.2 Engage partner team to define goals

    4.3 Choose your success

    metrics

    This phase will allow you to define the relationship with your newly chosen partner, including choosing the right contract mechanism, defining shared goals for the relationship, and selecting the metrics and processes to measure performance.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    IT leadership

    Procurement team

    Product owners

    Project managers

    Implementing the Partner

    Implementing the new partner is an exercise in collaboration

    • Successfully implementing your new partner is an exercise in working together
    1. Define a contract mechanism that is appropriate for the relationship, but is not meant as punitive, contract-based management – this sets you up for failure.
    2. Engage with your team and your partner as one team to build shared, measurable goals
    3. Work with the team to define the metrics and processes by which progress against these goals will be measured
  • Goals, metrics and process should be transparent to the team so all can see how their performance ties to success
  • Make sure to take time to celebrate successes with the whole team as one
  • Info-Tech Insight

    Implement the relationship the same way you want it to work: as one team. Work together on contract mechanism, shared goals, metrics, and performance measurement. This transparency and collaboration will build a one team view, leading to long-term success.

    Step 4.1

    Engage partner to choose contract mechanism

    Activities

    4.1.1 Confirm your contract mechanism

    This step involves the following participants:

    IT leadership

    Procurement team

    Vendor team

    Outcomes of this step

    Contract between the vendor and the firm for the services

    Negotiate agreement

    Evaluate your RFP responses to see if they are complete and if the vendor followed your instructions.

    Then:

    Plan negotiation(s) with one or more vendors based on your questions and opportunities identified during evaluation.

    Select finalist(s).

    Apply selection criteria.

    Resolve vendors' exceptions.

    Negotiate before you select your vendor:

    Negotiating with two or more vendors will maintain your competitive leverage while decreasing the time it takes to negotiate the deal.

    Perform legal reviews as necessary.

    Use sound competitive negotiations principles.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Be certain to include any commitments made in the RFP, presentations, and proposals in the agreement, as the standard for an underperforming vendor.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Providing contract terms in an RFP can dramatically reduce time for this step by understanding the vendor’s initial contractual position for negotiation.

    Leverage ITRG's negotiation process research for additional information

    For more details on this process please see our research Drive Successful Sourcing Outcomes with a Robust RFP Process

    4.1.1 Confirm your contract mechanism

    30 min

    1. Does the firm have prior experience with this type of sourcing arrangement?
    2. Does the firm have an existing services agreement with the selected partner?
    3. What contract mechanisms have been used in the past for these types of arrangements?
    4. What mechanism was proposed by the partner in their RFP response?

    Download the Select a Sourcing Partner Presentation Template

    Input Output
    • Past sourcing agreements from Procurement
    • Proposed agreement from partner
    • Agreed upon contract mechanism
    Materials Participants
    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation template
    • Technology leaders
    • Vendor management group
    • Partner leaders

    Choose the appropriate contract method

    Work being sourced

    Partner proposal

    Agreed-upon mechanism

    Work being sourced

    Vendor management experience with type

    Partner proposed contract method

    Agreed-upon contract method

    Java development team to build new product

    Similar work done with fixed price with another vendor

    Time and materials per scrum team

    Time and materials per scrum team to avoid vendor conflicts inherent in fixed price which limit innovation

    Step 4.2

    Engage partner team to define shared goals

    Activities

    4.2.1 Define your shared goals

    This step involves the following participants:

    IT leadership

    Vendor leadership

    Outcomes of this step

    Shared goals for the team

    Define success and shared goals

    Work together to define how you will measure yourselves.

    One team

    • Treating the new center and the existing team as one team is critical to long-term success.
    • Having a plan that allows for teams to meet frequently face-to-face "get to know you" and "stay connected" sessions will help the team gel.

    Shared goals

    • New group must share common goals and measurements.

    Common understanding

    • New team must have a common understanding and culture on key facets such as:
      • Measurement of quality
      • Openness to feedback and knowledge sharing
      • Culture of collaboration
      • Issue and Risk Management

    4.2.1 Define your shared goals

    30 min

    1. List each item in the scope of work for the sourcing arrangement – e.g. development of product XXX.
    2. For each scope item, detail the benefit expected by the firm – e.g. development cost expected to drop by 10% per year, or customer satisfaction improvement.
    3. For each benefit define how you will measure success – e.g. track cost of development for the development team assigned, or track Customer Satisfaction Survey results.
    4. For each measure, define a target for this year – e.g. 10% decrease over last year's cost, or customer satisfaction improvement from 6 to 7.

    Download the Select a Sourcing Partner Presentation Template

    InputOutput
    • Services being procured from RFx
    • Benefits expected from the sourcing strategy
    • Baseline scores for measurements
    • Shared goals agreed upon between team and partner
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation template
    • Technology leaders
    • Partner leaders

    Define goals collaboratively

    Role and benefit

    Goals and objectives

    Role / work being sourced

    Benefit expected

    Measure of success

    Year over year targets

    Java development team to build new product

    New product to replace aging legacy

    Launch of new product

    Agree on launch schedule and MVP for each release / roadmap

    Step 4.3

    Choose your success metrics

    Activities

    4,3.1 Define metrics and process to monitor

    This step involves the following participants:

    IT leadership

    Product owners

    Project managers

    Vendor leaders

    Outcomes of this step

    Metrics and process to measure performance

    4.3.1 Define metrics and process to monitor

    30 min

    1. For each goal defined and measure of success, break down the measure into quantifiable, measurable factors – e.g. Development cost is defined as all the costs tracked to the project including development, deployment, project management, etc.
    2. For each factor choose the metric that can be reported on – e.g. project actuals.
    3. For each metric define the report and reporting frequency – e.g. monthly project actuals from project manager.

    Download the Select a Sourcing Partner Presentation Template

    InputOutput
    • Development process
    • Deployment process
    • Operations process
    • IT Security policies
    • Documentation of key technical characteristics that need to be part of provider profiling
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Select a Sourcing Partner for Your Development Team Presentation template
    • Development leaders
    • Deployment team leaders
    • Infrastructure leaders
    • IT operations leaders
    • Product owners
    • Project managers

    Agreed-upon metrics

    Goal

    Metrics and process

    Agreed-upon goal

    Year 1 target

    Metric to measure success

    Measurement mechanism

    Deliver roadmap of releases

    3 releases – MVP in roadmap

    Features and stories delivered

    Measure delivery of stories from Jira

    Research Contributor

    The image contains a picture of Alaisdar Graham.

    Alaisdar Graham

    Executive Counsellor

    Info-Tech Research Group

    During Alaisdar’s 35-year career in information and operational technology, Alaisdar has been CIO for public sector organizations and private sector companies. He has been an entrepreneur with his own consultancy and a founder or business advisor with four cyber-security start-ups, Alaisdar has developed experience across a broad range of industries within a number of different countries and become known for his ability to drive business benefits and improvements through the use of technology.

    Alaisdar has worked with CXO-level executives across different businesses. Whether undertaking a digital transformation, building and improving IT functions across your span of control, or helping you create and execute an integrated technology strategy, Alaisdar can provide insight while introducing you to Info-Tech Research Group’s experts. Alaisdar’s experience with organizational turn- around, governance, project, program and portfolio management, change management, risk and security will support your organization’s success.

    Research Contributor

    The image contains a picture of Richard Nachazel.

    Richard Nachazel

    Executive Counsellor

    Info-Tech Research Group

    • Richard has more than 40 years working in various Fortune 500 organizations. His specialties are collaborating with business and IT executives and senior stakeholders to define strategic goals and transform operational protocols, standards, and methodologies. He has established a reputation at multiple large companies for taking charge of critical, high-profile enterprise projects in jeopardy of failure and turning them around. Colleagues and peers recognize his ability to organize enterprise efforts, build, develop, and motivate teams, and deliver outstanding outcomes.
    • Richard has worked as a Global CISO & Head of IT Governance for a Swiss Insurance company, Richard developed and led a comprehensive Cyber-Security Framework that provided leadership and oversight of the cyber-security program. Additionally, he was responsible for their IT Governance Risk & Compliance Operation and the information data security compliance in a complex global environment. Richard’s experience with organizational turn around, governance, risk, and controls, and security supports technology delivery integration with business success. Richard’s ability to engage executive and senior management decision makers and champion vision will prove beneficial to your organization.

    Research Contributor

    The image contains a picture of Craig Broussard.

    Craig Broussard

    Executive Counsellor

    Info-Tech Research Group

    • Craig has over 35 years of IT experience including software development, enterprise system management, infrastructure, and cyber security operations. Over the last 20 years, his focus has been on infrastructure and security along with IT service management. He’s been an accomplished speaker and panelist at industry trade events over the past decade.
    • Craig has served as Global Infrastructure Director for NCH Corporation, VP of Information Technology at ATOS, and earlier in his career as the Global Head of Data Center Services at Nokia Siemens Networks. Craig also worked for MicroSolutions (a Mark Cuban Company). Additionally, Craig received formal consulting training while working for IBM Global Services.
    • Craig’s deep experience across many aspects of IT from Governance through Delivery makes him an ideal partner for Info-Tech members.

    Bibliography

    Offshore, Onshore or Hybrid–Choosing the Best IT Outsourcing Model. (n.d.).
    Offshore Dedicated Development Team – A Compelling Hiring Guide. (n.d.).
    The Three Non-Negotiables Of IT Offshoring. (n.d.). Forbes.
    Top Ten Countries For Offshoring. Forbes, 2004.
    Nearshoring in Europe: Choose the Best Country for IT Outsourcing - The World Financial Review. (n.d.).
    Select an Offshore Jurisdiction. The Best Countries for Business in 2021-2022! | InternationalWealth.info. (n.d.).
    How to Find the Best Country to Set Up an Offshore Company. (n.d.). biz30.
    Akbar, M. A., Alsanad, A., Mahmood, S., & Alothaim, A. (2021). Prioritization-based taxonomy of global software development challenges: A FAHP based analysis. IEEE Access, 9, 37961–37974
    Ali, S. (2018). Practices in Software Outsourcing Partnership: Systematic Literature Review Protocol with Analysis. Journal of Computers, (February), 839–861
    Baird Georgia, A. (2007). MISQ Research Curation on Health Information Technology 2. Progression of Health IT Research in MIS Quarterly. MIS Quarterly, 2007(June), 1–14.
    Akbar, M. A., Alsanad, A., Mahmood, S., & Alothaim, A. (2021). Prioritization-based taxonomy of global software development challenges: A FAHP based analysis. IEEE Access, 9, 37961–37974
    Ali, S. (2018). Practices in Software Outsourcing Partnership: Systematic Literature Review Protocol with Analysis. Journal of Computers, (February), 839–861
    Baird Georgia, A. (2007). MISQ Research Curation on Health Information Technology 2. Progression of Health IT Research in MIS Quarterly. MIS Quarterly, 2007(June), 1–14.
    Carmel, E., & Abbott, P. (2006). Configurations of global software development: offshore versus nearshore. … on Global Software Development for the Practitioner, 3–7.
    Hanafizadeh, P., & Zare Ravasan, A. (2018). A model for selecting IT outsourcing strategy: the case of e-banking channels. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 21(2), 111–138.
    Ishizaka, A., Bhattacharya, A., Gunasekaran, A., Dekkers, R., & Pereira, V. (2019). Outsourcing and offshoring decision making. International Journal of Production Research, 57(13), 4187–4193.
    Jeong, J. J. (2021). Success in IT offshoring: Does it depend on the location or the company? Arxiv.
    Joanna Minkiewicz, J. E. (2009). Deakin Research Online Online. 2007, Interrelationships between Innovation and Market Orientation in SMEs, Management Research News, Vol. 30, No. 12, Pp. 878-891., 30(12), 878–891.

    Bibliography

    King, W. R., & Torkzadeh, G. (2016). Special Issue Information Systems Offshoring : Research Status and Issues. MIS Quarterly, 32(2), 205–225.
    Kotlarsky, J., & Oshri, I. (2008). Country attractiveness for offshoring and offshore outsourcing: Additional considerations. Journal of Information Technology, 23(4), 228–231.
    Lehdonvirta, V., Kässi, O., Hjorth, I., Barnard, H., & Graham, M. (2019). The Global Platform Economy: A New Offshoring Institution Enabling Emerging-Economy Microproviders. Journal of Management, 45(2), 567–599.
    Mahajan, A. (2018). Risks and Benefits of Using Single Supplier in Software Development. Oulu University of Applied Sciences. Retrieved from
    Murberg, D. (2019). IT Offshore Outsourcing: Best Practices for U.S.-Based Companies. University of Oregon Applied Information Management, 1277(800), 824–2714.
    Nassimbeni, G., Sartor, M., & Dus, D. (2012). Security risks in service offshoring and outsourcing. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 112(3), 405–440.
    Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15(2–3), 139–178.
    Pilkova, A., & Holienka, M. (2018). Home-Based Business in Visegrad Countries: Gem Perspective. Innovation Management, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability 2018 Proceedings of the 6th International Conference.
    Rahman, H. U., Raza, M., Afsar, P., Alharbi, A., Ahmad, S., & Alyami, H. (2021). Multi-criteria decision making model for application maintenance offshoring using analytic hierarchy process. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11(18).
    Rahman, H. U., Raza, M., Afsar, P., Khan, H. U., & Nazir, S. (2020). Analyzing factors that influence offshore outsourcing decision of application maintenance. IEEE Access, 8, 183913–183926.
    Roadmunk. What is a product roadmap? Roadmunk, n.d. Accessed 12 Oct. 2021.
    Rottman, J. W., & Lacity, M. C. (2006). Proven practices for effectively offshoring IT work. MIT Sloan Management Review.
    Smite, D., Moe, N. B., Krekling, T., & Stray, V. (2019). Offshore Outsourcing Costs: Known or Still Hidden? Proceedings - 2019 ACM/IEEE 14th International Conference on Global Software Engineering, ICGSE 2019, 40–47.
    Welsum, D. Van, & Reif, X. (2005). Potential Offshoring: Evidence from Selected OECD Countries. Brookings Trade Forum, 2005(1), 165–194.
    Zhang, Y., Liu, S., Tan, J., Jiang, G., & Zhu, Q. (2018). Effects of risks on the performance of business process outsourcing projects: The moderating roles of knowledge management capabilities. International Journal of Project Management, 36(4), 627–639.

    Leading Through Uncertainty Workshop Overview

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}474|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $123,999 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 5 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Leadership Development Programs
    • Parent Category Link: /leadership-development-programs

    As the world around us changes there is a higher risk that IT productivity and planned priorities will be derailed.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    To meet the challenges of uncertainty head on IT leaders must adapt so their employees are supported and IT departments continue to operate successfully.

    Impact and Result

    • Clearly define and articulate the current and future priorities to provide direction and cultivate hope for the future.
    • Recognize and manage your own reactions to be conscious of how you are showing up and the perceptions others may have.
    • Incorporate the 4Cs of Leading Through Uncertainty into your leadership practice to make sense of the situation and lead others through it.
    • Build tactics to connect with your employees that will ensure employee engagement and productivity.

    Leading Through Uncertainty Workshop Overview Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Workshop Overview

    Read our concise Workshop Overview to find out how this program can support IT leaders when managing teams through uncertain times.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    • Leading Through Uncertainty (LTU) Workshop Overview
    [infographic]

    Master the Secrets of VMware Licensing to Maximize Your Investment

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}138|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Licensing
    • Parent Category Link: /licensing
    • A lack of understanding around VMware’s licensing models, bundles, and negotiation tactics makes it difficult to negotiate from a position of strength.
    • Unfriendly commercial practices combined with hyperlink-ridden agreements have left organizations vulnerable to audits and large shortfall payments.
    • Enterprise license agreements (ELAs) come in several purchasing models and do not contain the EULA or various VMware product guide documentation that governs license usage rules and can change monthly.
    • Without a detailed understanding of VMware’s various purchasing models, shelfware often occurs.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Contracts are typically overweighted with a discount at the expense of contractual T&Cs that can restrict license usage and expose you to unpleasant financial surprises and compliance risk.
    • VMware customers almost always have incomplete price information from which to effectively negotiate a “best in class” ELA.
    • VMware has a large lead in being first to market and it realizes that running dual virtualization stacks is complex, unwieldy, and expensive. To further complicate the issues, most skill sets in the industry are skewed towards VMware.

    Impact and Result

    • Negotiate desired terms and conditions at the start of the agreement, and prioritize which use rights may be more important than an additional discount percentage.
    • Gather data points and speak with licensing partners to determine if the deal being offered is in fact as great as VMware says it is.
    • Beware of out-year pricing and ELA optimization reviews that may provide undesirable surprises and more spend than was planned.

    Master the Secrets of VMware Licensing to Maximize Your Investment Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Manage Your VMware Agreements – Use the Info-Tech tools capture your existing licenses and prepare for your renewal bids.

    Use Info-Tech’s licensing best practices to avoid shelfware with VMware licensing and remain compliant in case of an audit.

    • Master the Secrets of VMware Licensing to Maximize Your Investment Storyboard

    2. Manage your VMware agreements

    Use Info-Tech’s licensing best practices to avoid shelfware with VMware licensing and remain compliant in case of an audit.

    • VMware Business as Usual – Install Base SnS Renewal Only Tool
    • VMware ELA RFQ Template

    3. Transition to the VMWare Cloud – Use these tools to evaluate your ELA and vShpere requirements and make an informed choice.

    Manage your renewals and transition to the cloud subscription model.

    • VPP Transactional Purchase Tool
    • VMware ELA Analysis Tool
    • vSphere Edition 7 Features List

    Infographic

    Further reading

    Master the Secrets of VMware Licensing to Maximize Your Investment

    Learn the essential steps to avoid overspending and to maximize negotiation leverage with VMware.

    EXECUTIVE BRIEF

    Analyst Perspective

    Master the Secrets of VMware Licensing to Maximize Your Investment.

    The image contains a picture of Scott Bickley.

    The mechanics of negotiating a deal with VMware may seem simple at first as the vendor is willing to provide a heavy discount on an enterprise license agreement (ELA). However, come renewal time, when a reduction in spend or shelfware is needed, or to exit the ELA altogether, the process can be exceedingly frustrating as VMware holds the balance of power in the negotiation.

    Negotiating a complete agreement with VMware from the start can save you from an immense headache and unforeseen expenditures. Many VMware customers do not realize that the terms and conditions in the Volume Purchasing Program (VPP) and Enterprise Purchasing Program (EPP) agreements limit how and where they are able to use their licenses.

    Furthermore, after the renewal is complete, organizations must still worry about the management of various license types, accurate discovery of what has been deployed, visibility into license key assignments, and over and under use of licenses.

    Preventive and proactive measures enclosed within this blueprint will help VMware clients mitigate this minefield of challenges.

    Scott Bickley
    Practice Lead, Vendor Management
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    Common Obstacles

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    VMware's dominant position in the virtualization space can create uncertainty to your options in the long term as well as the need to understand:

    • The hybrid cloud model.
    • Hybrid VM security and management.
    • New subscription license model and how it affects renewals.

    Make an informed decision with your VMware investments to allow for continued ROI.

    There are several hurdles that are presented when considering a VMware ELA:

    • Evolving licensing and purchasing models
    • Understanding potential ROI in the cloud landscape
    • Evolving door of corporate ownership

    Overcoming these and other obstacles are key to long-term satisfaction with your VMware infrastructure.

    Info-Tech has a two-phase approach:

    • Manage your VMware agreements.
    • Plan a transition to the cloud.

    A tactical roadmap approach to VMware ELA and the cloud will ensure long-term success and savings.

    Info-Tech Insight

    VMware customers almost always have incomplete price information from which to effectively negotiate a “best in class” ELA.

    Your challenge

    VMware's dominant position in the virtualization space can create uncertainty to your options in the long term driven by:

    • VMware’s dominant market position and ownership of the virtualization market, which is forcing customers to focus on managing capacity demand to ensure a positive ROI on every license.
    • The trend toward a hybrid cloud for many organizations, especially those considering using VMware in public clouds, resulting in confusion regarding licensing and compliance scenarios.

    ELAs and EPPs are generally the only way to get a deep discount from VMware.

    The image contains a pie chart to demonstrate that 85% have answered yes to being audited by VMware for software license compliance.

    Common obstacles

    There are several hurdles that are presented when considering a VMware ELA.

    • A lack of understanding around VMware’s licensing models, bundles, and negotiation tactics makes it difficult to negotiate from a position of strength.
    • Unfriendly commercial practices combined with hyperlink-ridden agreements have left organizations vulnerable to audits and large shortfall payments.
    • ELAs come in several purchasing models and do not contain the EULA or various VMware product guide documentation that govern license usage rules and can change monthly.

    Competition is a key driver of price

    The image contains a screenshot of a bar graph to demonstrate virtualization market share % 2022.

    Source: Datanyze

    Master the Secrets of VMware Licensing to Maximize your Investment

    The image contains a screenshot of the Thought model on Master the secrets of VMware Licensing to Maximize your Investment.

    Info-Tech’s methodology for Master the Secrets of VMware Licensing to Maximize Your Investment

    1. Manage Your VMware Agreements

    2. Transition to the VMware Cloud

    Phase Steps

    1.1 Establish licensing requirements

    1.2 Evaluate licensing options

    1.3 Evaluate agreement options

    1.4 Purchase and manage licenses

    1.5 Understand SnS renewal management

    2.1 Understand the VMware subscription model

    2.2 Migrate workloads and licenses

    2.3 Manage SnS and cloud subscriptions

    Phase Outcomes

    Understanding of your licensing requirements and what agreement option best fits your needs for now and the future.

    Knowledge of VMware’s sales model and how to negotiate the best deal.

    Knowledge of the evolving cloud subscription model and how to plan your cloud migration and transition to the new licensing.

    Insight summary

    Overarching insight

    With the introduction of the subscription licensing model, VMware licensing and renewals are becoming more complex and require a deeper understanding of the license program options to best manage renewals and cloud deployments as well as to maximize legacy ROI.

    Phase 1 insight

    Contracts are typically overweighted with a discount at the expense of contractual T&Cs that can restrict license usage and expose you to unpleasant financial surprises and compliance risk.

    Phase 1 insight

    VMware has a large lead in being first to market and it realizes running dual virtualization stacks is complex, unwieldy, and expensive. To further complicate the issues, most skill sets in the industry are skewed toward VMware.

    Phase 2 insight

    VMware has purposefully reduced a focus on the actual license terms and conditions; most customers focus on the transactional purchase or the ELA document, but the rules governing usage are on a website and can be changed by VMware regularly.

    Tactical insight

    Beware of out-year pricing and ELA optimization reviews that may provide undesirable surprises and more spend than was planned.

    Tactical insight

    Negotiate desired terms and conditions at the start of the agreement, and prioritize which use rights may be more important than an additional discount percentage.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    VMware ELA Analysis Tool

    VMware ELA RFQ Template Tool

    VPP Transaction Purchase Tool

    VMware ELA Analysis Tool

    Use this tool as a template for an RFQ with VMware ELA contracts.

    Use this tool to analyze cost breakdown and discount based on your volume purchasing program (VPP) level.

    The image contains screenshots of the VMware ELA Analysis Tool. The image contains a screenshot of the VMware ELA RFQ template tool. The image contains a screenshot of the VPP Transaction Purchase Tool.

    Key deliverable:

    VMware Business as Usual SnS Renewal Only Tool

    Use this tool to analyze discounts from a multi-year agreement vs. prepay. See how you can get the best discount.

    The image contains screenshots of the VMware Business as Usual SnS Renewal Only Tool.

    Blueprint Objectives

    The aim of this blueprint is to provide a foundational understanding of VMware’s licensing agreement and best practices to manage them.

    Why VMware

    What to Know

    The Future

    VMware is the leader in OS virtualization, however, this is a saturated market, which is being pressured by public and hybrid cloud as a competitive force taking market share.

    There are few viable alternatives to VMware for virtualization due to vendor lock-in of existing IT infrastructure footprint. It is too difficult and cost prohibitive to make a shift away from VMware even when alternative solutions are available.

    ELAs are the preferred method of contracting as it sets the stage for a land-and-expand product strategy; once locked into the ELA model, customers must examine VMware alternatives with preference or risk having Support and Subscription Services (SnS) re-priced at retail.

    VMware does not provide a great deal of publicly available information regarding its enterprise license agreement (ELA) options, leaving a knowledge gap that allows the sales team to steer the customer.

    VMware is taking countermeasures against increasing competition.

    Recent contract terms changed to eliminate perpetual caps on SnS renewals; they are now tied to a single year of discounted SnS, then they go to list price.

    Migration of list pricing to a website versus contract, where pricing can now be changed, reducing discount percentage effectiveness.

    Increased audits of customers, especially those electing to not renew an ELA.


    Examining VMware’s vendor profile

    Turbonomics conducted a vendor profile on major vendors, focusing on licensing and compliance. It illustrated the following results:

    The image contains a pie graph to demonstrate that the majority of companies say yes to using license enterprise software from VMware.

    The image contains a bar graph to demonstrate what license products organizations use of VMware products.

    Source: Turbonomics
    N-sample size

    Case Study

    The image contains a logo for ADP.

    INDUSTRY: Finance

    SOURCE: VMware.com

    “We’ll have network engineers, storage engineers, computer engineers, database engineers, and systems engineers all working together as one intact team developing and delivering goals on specific outcomes.” – Vipul Nagrath, CIO, ADP

    Improving developer capital management

    Constant innovation helped ADP keep ahead of customer needs in the human resources space, but it also brought constant changes to the IT environment. Internally, the company found it was spending too long working on delivering the required infrastructure and system updates. IT staff wanted to improve velocity for refreshes to better match the needs of ADP developers and encourage continued development innovation.

    Business needs

    • Improve turnaround time on infrastructure refreshes to better meet developer roadmaps.
    • Establish an IT culture that works at the global scale of ADP and empowers individual team members.
    • Streamline approach toward infrastructure resource delivery to reduce need for manual management.

    Impact

    • Infrastructure resource delivery reduced from 100+ days to minutes, improving ADP developer efficiency.
    • VMware Cloud™ on AWS establishes seamless private and public cloud workflows, fostering agility and innovation.
    • Automating IT management redirects resources to R&D, boosting time to market for new services.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    “Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.” “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.” “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.” “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3

    Call #1: Discuss scope requirements, objectives, and your specific challenges.

    Call #2: Assess the current state.

    Determine licensing position.

    Call #3: Complete a deployment count, needs analysis, and internal audit.

    Call #4: Review findings with analyst:

    • Review licensing options.
    • Review licensing rules.
    • Review contract option types.

    Call #5: Select licensing option. Document forecasted costs and benefits.

    Call #6: Review final contract:

    • Discuss negotiation points.
    • Plan a roadmap for SAM.

    Call #7: Negotiate final contract. Evaluate and develop a roadmap for SAM.

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is between 2 to 6 calls over the course of 1 to 2 months.

    Phase # 1

    Manage Your VMware Agreements

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    1.1 Establish licensing requirements

    1.2 Evaluate licensing options

    1.3 Evaluate agreement options

    1.4 Purchase and manage licenses

    2.1 Understand the VMware subscription model

    2.2 Migrate workloads and licenses

    2.3 Discuss the VMware sales approach

    2.4 Manage SnS and cloud subscriptions

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Understanding the VMware licensing model
    • Understanding the license agreement options
    • Understanding the VMware sales approach

    This phase will take you thorough:

    • The new VMware subscription movement to the cloud
    • How to prepare and migrate
    • Manage your subscriptions efficiently

    1.1 Establish licensing requirements

    VMware has greatly improved the features of vSphere over time.

    vSphere Main Editions Overview

    • vSphere Standard – Provides the basic features for server consolidation. A support and subscription contract (SnS) is mandatory when purchasing the vSphere Standard.
    • vSphere Enterprise Plus – Provides the full range of vSphere features. A support and subscription contract (SnS) is mandatory when purchasing the Enterprise Plus editions.
    • vSphere Essentials kit – The Essentials kit is an all-in-one solution for small environments with up to three hosts (2 CPUs on each host). Support is optional when purchasing the Essentials kit and is available on a per-incident basis.
    • vSphere Essentials Plus kit – This is similar to the Essentials kit and provides additional features such as vSphere vMotion, vSphere HA, and vSphere replication. A support and subscription contract (SnS) is sold separately, and a minimum of one year of SnS is required.

    Review vSphere Edition Features

    The image contains a screenshot to review the vSphere Edition Features.

    Download the vSphere Edition 7 Features List

    1.2 Evaluate licensing options

    VMware agreement types

    Review purchase options to align with your requirements.

    Transactional VPP EPP ELA

    Transactional

    Entry-level volume license purchasing program

    Mid-level purchasing program

    Highest-level purchasing program

    • Purchasing in this model is not recommended for business purposes unless very infrequent and low quantities.
    • 250 points minimum
    • Four tiers of discounts
    • Rolling eight-quarter points accumulation period
    • Discounts on license only

    Deal size of initial purchase typically is:

    • US$250K MSRP License + SnS (2,500 tokens)
    • Exceptions do exist with purchase volume

    Minimum deal size of top-up purchase:

    • US$50K MSRP License + SnS (500 tokens)
    • Initial purchase determines token level
    • Three-year term

    Minimum deal size of initial purchase:

    • US$150K-$250K
    • Discounted licenses and SnS through term of contract
    • Single volume license key
    • No final true-up
    • Global deployment rights and consolidation of multiple agreements

    1.2.1 The Volume Purchasing Program (VPP)

    This is the entry-level purchasing program aimed at small/mid-sized organizations.

    How the program works

    • The threshold to be able to purchase from the VPP program is 250 points minimum, equivalent to $25,000.
    • Discounts attained can only be applied to license purchases. They do not apply to service and support/renewals. Discounts range from 4% to 12%.
    • For the large majority of products 1 VPP point = ~$100.
      • Point values will be the same globally.
      • Point ratios may vary over time as SKUs are changed.
      • Points are valid for two years.

    Benefits

    • Budget predictability for two years.
    • Simple license purchase process.
    • Receive points on qualifying purchases that accumulate over a rolling eight-quarter period.
    • Online portal for tracking purchases and eligible discounts.
    • Global program where affiliates can purchase from existing contract.

    VPP Point & Discount Table

    Level

    Point Range

    Discount

    1

    250-599

    4%

    2

    600-999

    6%

    3

    1,000-1,749

    9%

    4

    1,750+

    12%

    Source: VMware Volume Purchasing Program

    1.2.2 Activity VPP Transactional Purchase Tool

    1-3 hours

    Instructions:

    1. Use the tool to analyze the cost breakdown and discount based on your Volume Purchasing Program level.
    2. On tab 1, Enter SnS install base renewal units and or new license details.
    3. Review tab 2 for Purchase summary.

    The image contains a screenshot of the VPP Transactional Purchase Tool.

    Input Output
    • SnS renewal details
    • New license requirements and pricing
    • Transaction purchase summary
    • Estimated VPP purchase level
    Materials Participants
    • Current VMware purchase orders
    • Any SnS renewal requirements
    • Transaction Purchase Tool
    • Procurement
    • Vendor Management
    • Licensing Admin

    Download the VPP Transactional Purchase Tool

    1.3 Evaluate agreement options

    Introduction to EPP and ELA

    What to know when using a token/credit-based agreement.

    Token/credit-based agreements carry high risk as customers are purchasing a set number of tokens/credits to be redeemed during the ELA term for licenses.

    • Tokens/credits that are not used during the ELA term expire and become worthless.
    • By default in most agreements (negotiation dependent), tokens/credits are tied to pricing maintained by VMware on its website that is subject to change (increase usually), resulting in a reduced value for the tokens/credits.
      • Therefore, it is necessary to negotiate to have current list prices for all products/versions included in the ELA to prevent price increases while in the current ELA term.
    • Token-based agreements may come with a lower overall discount level as VMware is granting more flexibility in terms of the wider product selection offered, vendor cost of overhead to manage the redemption program, currency exchange risks, and more complex revenue recognition headaches.

    1.3.1 The Enterprise Purchasing Program (EPP)

    This is aimed at mid-tier customers looking for flexibility with deeper discounting.

    How the program works

    • Token-based program in which tokens are redeemed for licenses and/or SnS.
      • Tokens can be added at any time to active fund.
      • Token usage is automatically tracked and reported.
    • Minimum order of 2,500 tokens, equivalent to $250,000 (1 token=$100).
      • Exceptions have been made, allowing for lower minimum spends.
    • Restricted to specific regions, not a global agreement.
    • Self-service portal for access to license keys and support entitlements.
    • Deeper discounting than the VMware Volume Purchase Program.
    • EPP initial purchase gets VPP L4 for four years.

    Benefits

    • Able to mix and match VMware products, manage licenses, and adjust deployment strategy.
    • Prices are protected for term of the EPP agreement.
    • Number of tokens needed to obtain a product or SnS are negotiated at the start of the contract and fixed for the term.
    • SnS is co-termed to the EPP term.
    • Ability to purchase new products that become available at a future date and are listed on the EPP Eligibility Matrix.

    EPP Level & Point Table

    Level

    Point Range

    7

    2,500-3,499

    8

    3,500-4,499

    9

    4,500-5,999

    10

    6,000+

    Source: VMware Volume Purchasing Program

    1.3.2 The ELA is aimed at large global organizations, offering the deepest discounts with operational benefits and flexibility

    What is an ELA?

    • The ELA agreement provides the best vehicle for global enterprises to obtain maximum discounts and price-hold protection for a set period of time. Discounts and price holds are removed once an ELA has expired.
    • The ELA minimum spend previously was $500,000. Purchase volume now generally starts at $250K total spend with exceptions and, depending on VMware, it may be possible to attain for $150K in net-new license spend.

    Key things to know

    • Customers pay up front for license and SnS rights, but depending on the deployment plans, the value of the licenses is not realized and/or recognized for up to two years after point of purchase.
    • License and SnS is paid up front for a three-year period in most ELAs, although a one- or two-year term can be negotiated.
    • Licenses not deployed in year one should be discounted in value and drive a re-evaluation of the ELA ROI, as even heavily discounted licenses that are not used until year three may not be such a great deal in retrospect.
      • Use a time value of money calculation to arrive at a realistic ROI.
      • Partner with Finance and Accounting to ensure the ROI also clears any Internal Hurdle Rate (IHR).
      • Share and strategically position your IHR with VMware and resellers to ensure they understand the minimum value an ELA deal must bring to the table.
    • Organizational changes, such as merger, acquisition, and divestiture (MAD) activities, may result in the customer paying for license rights that can no longer be used and/or require a renegotiated ELA.

    Info-Tech Insight

    If a legacy ELA exists that has “deploy or lose” language, engage VMware to recapture any lost license rights as VMware has changed this language effective with 2016 agreements and there is an “appeals” process for affected customers.

    1.3.3 Select the best ELA variant to match your specific demand profile and financial needs

    The advantages of an ELA are:

    • Maximum discount level + price protection
    • SnS discounted at % of net license fee
    • Sole option for global use territory rights

    General disadvantages are:

    • Term lock-in with SnS for three years
    • Pay up front and if defer usage, ROI drops
    • Territory rights priced at a premium versus domestic use rights

    Type of ELAs

    ELA Type

    Description

    Pros and Cons

    Capped (max quantities)

    Used to purchase a specific quantity and type of license.

    Pro – Clarity on what will be purchased

    Pro – Lower risk of over licensing

    Con – Requires accurate forecasting

    All you can eat or unlimited

    Used to purchase access to specified products that can be deployed in unlimited quantities during the ELA term.

    Pro – Acquire large quantity of licenses

    Pro – Accurate forecasting not critical

    Con – Deployment can easily exceed forecast, leading to high renewal costs

    Burn-down

    A form of capped ELA purchase that uses prepaid tokens that can be used more flexibly to acquire a variety of licenses or services. This can include the hybrid purchasing program (HPP) credits. However, the percentage redeemable for VMware subscription services may be limited to 10% of the MSRP value of the HPP credit.

    Pro – Accurate demand forecast not critical

    Pro – Can be used for products and services

    Con – Unused tokens or credits are forfeited

    True-up

    Allows for additional purchases during the ELA term on a determined schedule based on the established ELA pricing.

    Pro – Consumption payments matched after initial purchase

    Pro – Accurate demand forecast not critical

    Con – Potentially requires transaction throughout term

    1.4 Purchase and manage licenses

    Negotiating ELA terms and conditions

    Editable copies of VMware’s license and governance documentation are a requirement to initiate the dialogue and negotiation process over T&Cs.

    VMware’s licensing is complex and although documentation is publicly available, it is often hidden on VMware’s website.

    Many VMware customers often overlook reviewing the license T&Cs, leaving them open to compliance risks.

    It is imperative for customers to understand:

    • Product definition for licensing of each acquired product
    • Products included by bundle
    • Use restrictions:
      • The VMware Product Guide, which includes information about:
        • ELA Order Forms, Amendments, Exhibits, EULA, Support T&Cs, and other policies that add dozens of pages to a contractual agreement.
        • All of these documents are web based and can change monthly; URL links in the contract do not take the user to the actual document but a landing page from which customers must find the applicable documents.
      • Obtain copies of ALL current documents at the time of your order and keep as a reference in the CLM and SAM systems.

    Build in time to obtain, review, and negotiate these documents (easily weeks to months).

    1.4.1 Negotiating ELA terms and conditions specifics

    License and Deployment

    • Review perpetual use rights for all licenses purchased under the ELA (exception being subscription services).
    • Carefully scrutinize contract language for clearly defined deployment rights.
      • Some agreements contain language that terminates the use rights for licenses not deployed by the end of the ELA term.
    • While older contracts would frequently contain clearly defined token values and product prices for the ELA term, VMware has moved away from this process and now refers to URL links for current MSRP pricing.

    Use Rights

    • The customer’s legal entities and territories listed in the contract are hard limits on the license usage via the VMware Product Guide definitions. Global use rights are not a standard license grant with VMware license agreement by default. Global rights are usually tied to an ELA.
    • VMware audits most aggressively against violations of territory use rights and will use the non-compliance events to resolve the issue via a commercial transaction.
      • Negotiate for assignment rights with no strings attached in terms of fees or multi-party consent by future affiliates or successors to a surviving entity.
    • Extraordinary Corporate Transaction clause: VMware’s standard language prevents customers from using licenses within the ELA for any third party that becomes part of customer’s business by way of acquisition, merger, consolidation, change of control, reorganization, or other similar transaction.
      • Request VMware to drop this language.
    • Include any required language pertaining to MAD events as default language will not allow for transfer or assignment of license rights.

    Checklist of necessary information to negotiate the best deal

    Product details that go beyond the sales pitch

    • Product family
    • Unique product SKU for license renewal
    • Part description
    • Current regional or global price list
    • One and three-year proposal for SnS renewals including new license and SnS detail
    • SnS term dates
    • Discount or offered prices for all line items (global pricing is generally ~20% higher than US pricing)

    Different support levels (e.g. basic, enterprise, per incident)

    • Standard pricing:
      • Basic Support = 21% of current list price (12x5)
      • Production Support = 25% of current list price (24x7 for severity 1 issues) – defined in VMware Support and Subscription Services T&Cs; non-severity 1 issues are 12x5

    Details to ensure the product being purchased matches the business needs

    • Realizing after the fact the product is insufficient with respect to functional requirements or that extra spend is required can be frustrating and extend expected timelines

    SnS renewals pricing is based on the (1) year SnS list price

    • This can be bundled for a multi-year discounted SnS rate (can result in 12%+ under VPP)

    Governing agreements, VPP program details

    • Have a printed copy of documents that are URL links, which VMware can change, allowing for surprises or unexpected changes in rules

    1.4.2 Activity VMware ELA Analysis Tool

    2-4 hours

    Instructions:

    1. As a group, review the various RFQ responses. Identify top three proposals and start to enter proposal details into the VPP Prepay or ELA tabs of the analysis tool.
    2. Review savings in the ELA Offer Analysis tab.

    The image contains screenshots of the VMware ELA Analysis Tool.

    Input Output
    • RFQ requirements data
    • RFQ response data
    • Analysis of ELA proposals
    • ELA savings analysis
    Materials Participants
    • RFQ response documents
    • ELA Analysis Tool
    • IT Leadership
    • Procurement
    • Vendor Management

    Download the VMware ELA Analysis Tool

    1.4.3 Negotiating ELA terms and conditions specifics: pricing, renewal, and exit

    VMware does not offer price protection on future license consumption by default.

    Securing “out years” pricing for SnS or the cost of SnS is critical or it will default to a set percentage (25%) of MSRP, removing the ELA discount.

    Typically, the out year is one year; maximum is two years.

    Negotiate the “go forward” SnS pricing post-ELA term as part of the ELA negotiations when you have some leverage.

    Default after (1) out year is to rise to 25% of current MSRP versus as low as 20% of net license price within the ELA.

    Carefully incorporate the desired installed-base licenses that were acquired pre-ELA into the agreement, but ensure unwanted licenses are removed.

    Ancillary but binding support policies, online terms and conditions, and other hyperlinked documentation should be negotiated and incorporated as part of the agreement whenever possible.

    1.4.4 Find the best reseller partner

    Seek out a qualified VMware partner that will work with you and with your interest as a priority:

    1. Resellers, at minimum, should have achieved an enterprise-level rating, as these partners can offer the deepest discounts and have more clout with VMware.
    2. Select your reseller prior to engaging in any RFX acquisition steps. Verify they are enterprise level or higher AND secure their written commitment to maximum pass-through of the discounting provided to them by VMware.
    3. Document and prioritize key T&Cs for your ELA and submit to your sales team along with a requirement and timeline for their formal response. Essentially, this escalates outside of the VMware process and disrupts the status quo. Ideally this will occur in advance of being presented a contract by VMware and be pre-emptive in nature.
    4. If applicable and of benefit or a high priority, seek out a reseller that is willing to finance the VMware upfront payment cost at a low or no interest rate.
    5. It will be important to have ELA-level deals escalated to higher levels of authority to obtain “best in class” discount levels, above and beyond those prescribed in the VMware sales playbook.
    6. VMware’s standard process is to “route” customers through a pre-defined channel and “deal desk” process. Preferred pricing of up to an additional 10% discount is reserved for the first reseller that registers the deal with VMware, with larger discounts reserved for the Enterprise and Premium partners. Additional discounts can be earned if the deal closes within specified time periods (First Deal Registration).

    1.4.5 Activity VMware ELA RFQ Template

    1-3 hours

    Use this tool for as a template for an RFQ with VMware ELA contracts.

    1. For SnS renewals that contain no new licenses, state that the requirement for award consideration is the provisioning of all details for each itemized SnS renewal product code corresponding to all the licenses of your installed base. The details for the renewals are to be placed in Section 1 of the template.
    2. SnS Renewal Options: Info-Tech recommends that you ask for one- and three-year SnS renewal proposals, assuming these terms are realistic for your business requirements. Then compare your SnS BAU costs for these two options against ELA offers to determine the best choice for your renewal.

    The image contains a screenshot of the VMware ELA RFQ Template.

    Input Output
    • Renewing SnS data
    • Agreement type options
    • Detailed list of required licenses
    • Summary list of SnS requirements
    Materials Participants
    • RFQ Template
    • SnS renewal summary
    • New license/subscription details
    • IT Leadership
    • Vendor Management
    • Procurement

    Download the VMware ELA RFQ Template

    1.4.6 Consider your path forward

    Consider your route forward as contract commitments, license compliance, and terms and conditions differ in structure to perpetual models previously used.

    • Are you able to accurately discover VMware licensing within your environment?
    • Is licensing managed for compliance? Are internal audits conducted so you have accurate results?
    • Have the product use rights been examined for terms and conditions such as geographic rights? Some T&Cs may change over time due to hyperlinked references within commercial documents.
    • How are Oracle and SQL being used within your VMware environment? This may affect license compliance with Oracle and Microsoft in virtualized environments.
    • Prepare for the Subscription model; it’s here now and will be the lead discussion with all VMware reps going forward.

    Shift to Subscription

    1. With the $64bn takeover by Broadcom, there will be a significant shift and pressure to the subscription model.
    2. Broadcom has significant growth targets for its VMware acquisition that can only be achieved through a strong press to a SaaS model.

    Info-Tech Insight

    VMware has a license cost calculator and additional licensing documents that can be used to help determine what spend should be.

    Phase # 2

    Transition to the VMware Cloud

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    1.1 Establish licensing requirements

    1.2 Evaluate licensing options

    1.3 Evaluate agreement options

    1.4 Purchase and manage licenses

    2.1 Understand the VMware subscription model

    2.2 Migrate workloads and licenses

    2.3 Discuss the VMware sales approach

    2.4 Manage SnS and cloud subscriptions

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Understand the VMware licensing model
    • Understand the license agreement options
    • Understand the VMware sales approach

    This phase will take you thorough:

    • The new VMware subscription movement to the cloud
    • How to prepare and migrate
    • Manage your subscriptions efficiently

    2.1 Understand the VMware subscription model

    VMware Cloud Universal

    • VMware Cloud Universal unifies compute, network, and storage capabilities across infrastructures, management, and applications.
    • Take advantage of financial and cloud management flexibility by combining on-premises and SaaS capabilities for automation, operations, log analytics, and network visibility across your infrastructure.
    • Capitalize on VMware knowledge by integrating proven migration methods and plans across your transformation journey such as consumption strategies, business outcome workshops, and more.
    • Determine your eligibility to earn a one-time discount with this exclusive benefit designed to offset the value of your current unamortized VMware on-premises license investments and then reallocate toward your multi-cloud initiatives.

    2.2 Migrate workloads and licenses to the cloud

    There are several cloud migration options and solutions to consider.

    • VMware Cloud offers solutions that can provide a low-cost path to the cloud that will help accelerate modernization.
    • There are also many third-party solution providers who can be engaged to migrate workloads and other infrastructure to VMware Cloud and into other public cloud providers.
    • VMware Cloud can be deployed on many IaaS providers such as AWS, Azure, Google, Dell, and IBM.

    VMware Cloud Assist

    1. Leverage all available transition funding opportunities and any IaaS migration incentives from VMware.
    2. Learn and understand the value and capabilities of VMware vRealize Cloud Universal to help you transition and manage hybrid infrastructure.

    2.2.1 Manage your VMware cloud subscriptions

    Use VMware vRealize to manage private, public, and local environments.

    Combine SaaS and on-premises capabilities for automation, operations, log analytics, network visibility, security, and compliance into one license.

    The image contains a screenshot of a diagram to demonstrate VMware cloud subscriptions.

    2.3 The VMware sales approach

    Understand the pitch before entering the discussion

    1. VMware will present a PowerPoint presentation proposal comparing a Business-as-Usual (BAU) scenario versus the ELA model.
    2. Critical factors to consider if considering the proposed ELA are growth rate projections, deployment schedule, cost of non-ELA products/options, shelf-ware, and non-ELA discounts (e.g. VPP, multi-year, or pre-paid).
    3. Involving VMware’s direct account team along with your reseller in the negotiations can be beneficial. Keep in mind that VMware ultimately decides on the final price in terms of the discount that is passed through. Ensure you have a clear line of sight into how pricing is determined.
    4. Explore reseller incentives and promotional programs that may provide for deeper than normal discount opportunities.

    INFO-TECH TIP: Create your own assumptions as inputs into the BAU model and then evaluate the ELA value proposition instead of depending on VMware’s model.

    2.4 Manage SnS and cloud subscriptions

    The new subscription model is making SnS renewal more complex.

    • Start renewal planning four to six months prior to anniversary.
    • Work closely with your reseller on your SnS renewal options.
    • Request “as is” versus subscription renewal proposal from reseller or VMware with a “savings” component.
    • Consider and review multi-year versus annual renewal; savings will differ.
    • For the Subscription transition renewal model, ensure that credits for legacy licensing is provided.
    • Negotiate cloud transition investments and incentives from VMware.

    What information to collect and how to analyze it

    • Negotiating toward preferred terms on SnS is critical, more so than when new license purchases are made, as approximately 75-80% of server virtualization are at x86 workloads, where maintenance revenue is a larger source of revenue for VMware than new license sales.
    • All relevant license and SnS details must be obtained from VMware to include Product Family, Part Description, Product Code (SKU), Regional/Global List Price, SnS Term Dates, and Discount Price for all new licenses.
    • VMware has all costs tied to the US dollar; you must calculate currency conversion into ROI models as VMware does not adjust token values of products across geographies or currency of purchase. The token to dollar value by product SKU is locked for the three-year term. This translates into a variable cost model depending on how local currency fluctuates against the US dollar; time the initial purchase to take this into consideration, if applicable.
    • Products purchased based on MSRP price with each token contains a value of US$100. Under the Hybrid Purchasing Program (HPP) credit values and associated buying power will fluctuate over the term as VMware reserves the right to adjust current list prices. Consider locking in a set product list and pricing versus HPP.
    • Take a structured approach to discover true discounts via the use of a tailored RFQ template and options model to compare and contrast VMware ELA proposals.

    Use Info-Tech Research Group’s customized RFQ template to discover true discount levels and model various purchase options for VMware ELA proposals.

    The image contains a screenshot of the VMware RFQ Template Tool.

    Summary of accomplishment

    Knowledge Gained

    • The key pieces of licensing information that should be gathered about the current state of your own organization.
    • An in-depth understanding of the required licenses across all of your products.
    • Clear methodology for selecting the most effective contract type.
    • Development of measurable, relevant metrics to help track future project success and identify areas of strength and weakness within your licensing program.

    Processes Optimized

    • Senior leaders in IT now have a clear understanding of the importance of licensing in relation to business objectives.
    • Understanding of the various licensing considerations that need to be made.
    • Contract negotiation.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Prepare for Negotiations More Effectively

    • IT budgets are increasing, but many CIOs feel their budgets are inadequate to accomplish what is being asked of them.
    • Eighty percent of organizations don’t have a mature, repeatable, scalable negotiation process.
    • Training dollars on negotiations are often wasted or ineffective.

    Price Benchmarking & Negotiation

    You need to achieve an objective assessment of vendor pricing in your IT contracts, but you have limited knowledge about:

    • Current price benchmarking on the vendor.
    • Pricing and negotiation intelligence.
    • How to secure a market-competitive price.
    • Vendor pricing tiers, models, and negotiation tactics.

    VMware vRealize Cloud Management

    VMware vCloud Suite is an integrated offering that brings together VMware’s industry-leading vSphere hypervisor and VMware vRealize Suite multi-vendor hybrid cloud management platform. VMware’s new portable licensing units allow vCloud Suite to build and manage both vSphere-based private clouds and multi-vendor hybrid clouds.

    Bibliography

    Barrett, Alex. “vSphere and vCenter licensing and pricing explained -- a VMware license guide.” TechTarget, July 2010. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Bateman, Kayleigh. “VMware licensing, pricing and features mini guide.” Computer Weekly, May 2011. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Blaisdell, Rick. “What Are The Common Business Challenges The VMware Sector Faces At This Point In Time?” CIO Review, n.d. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    COMPAREX. “VMware Licensing Program.” COMPAREX, n.d. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Couesbot, Erwann. “Using VMware? Oracle customers hate this licensing pitfall.” UpperEdge, 17 October 2016. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Crayon. “VMware Licensing Programs.” Crayon, n.d. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Datanyze." Virtualization Software Market Share.” Datanyze, n.d. Web.
    Demers, Tom. “Top 18 Tips & Quotes on the Challenges & Future of VMware Licensing.” ProfitBricks, 1 September 2015. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Fenech, J. “A quick look at VMware vSphere Editions and Licensing.” VMware Hub by Altaro, 17 May 2017. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Flexera. “Challenges of VMware Licensing.” Flexera, n.d. Accessed 5 February 2018.
    Fraser, Paris. “A Guide for VMware Licensing.” Sovereign, 11 October 2016. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Haag, Michael. “IDC Data Shows vSAN is the Largest Share of Total HCI Spending.” VMware Blogs, 1 December 2017. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Kealy, Victoria. “VMware Licensing Quick Guide 2015.” The ITAM Review, 17 December 2015. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Kirsch, Brian. “A VMware licensing guide to expanding your environment.” TechTarget, August 2017. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Kirupananthan, Arun. “5 reasons to get VMware licensing right.” Softchoice, 16 April 2018. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Knorr, Eric. “VMware on AWS: A one-way ticket to the cloud.” InfoWorld, 17 October 2016. Accessed 7 May 2018
    Leipzig. “Help, an audit! License audits by VMware. Are you ready?” COMPAREX Group, 2 May 2016. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Mackie, Kurt. “VMware Rips Microsoft for Azure “Bare Metal” Migration Solution.” Redmond Magazine, 27 November 2017. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Micromail. “VMware vSphere Software Licensing.” Micromail, n.d. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Microsoft Corportation. “Migrating VMware to Microsoft Azure” Microsoft Azure, November 2017. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Peter. “Server Virtualization and OS Trends.” Spiceworks, 30 August 2016. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Rich. “VMware running on Azure.” The ITAM Review, 28 November 2017. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Robb, Drew. “Everything you need to know about VMware’s licensing shake up.” Softchoice, 4 March 2016. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Rose, Brendan. “How to determine which VMware licensing option is best.” Softchoice, 28 July 2015. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Scholten, Eric. “New VMware licensing explained.” VMGuru, 12 July 2011. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Sharwood, Simon. “Microsoft to run VMware on Azure, on bare metal. Repeat. Microsoft to run VMware on Azure.” The Register, 22 November 2017. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Siebert, Eric. “Top 7 VMware Management Challenges.” Veeam, n.d. Web.
    Smith, Greg. “Will The Real HCI Market Leader Please Stand Up?” Nutanix, 29 September 2017. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Spithoven, Richard. “Licensing Oracle software in VMware vCenter 6.0.” LinkedIn, 2 May 2016. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    VMTurbo, Inc. “Licensing, Compliance & Audits in the Cloud Era.” Turbonomics, November 2015. Web.
    VMware. “Aug 1st – Dec 31st 2016 Solution Provider Program Requirements & Incentives & Rewards.” VMware, n.d. Web.
    VMware. “Global Support and Subscription Services “SnS” Renewals Policy.” VMware, n.d. Web.
    VMware. “Support Policies.” VMware, n.d. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    VMware. “VMware Cloud Community.” VMware Cloud, n.d. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    VMware. “VMware Cloud on AWS” VMware Cloud, n.d. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    VMware. “VMware Enterprise Purchasing Program.” VMware, 2013. Web.
    VMware. “VMware Product Guide.” VMware, May 2018. Web.
    VMware. “VMware Volume Purchasing Program.” VMware, April 2019. Web.
    VMware. "VMware Case Studies." VMware, n.d. Web.
    Wiens, Rob. “VMware Enterprise Licensing – What You Need To Know. House of Brick, 14 April 2017. Accessed 7 May 2018

    Build a Robust and Comprehensive Data Strategy

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}120|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.3/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $46,734 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 29 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Data Management
    • Parent Category Link: /data-management
    • The volume and variety of data that organizations have been collecting and producing have been growing exponentially and show no sign of slowing down.
    • At the same time, business landscapes and models are evolving, and users and stakeholders are becoming more and more data centric, with maturing expectations and demands.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • As the CDO or equivalent data leader in your organization, a robust and comprehensive data strategy is the number one tool in your toolkit for delivering on your mandate of creating measurable business value from data.
    • A data strategy should never be formulated disjointed from the business. Ensure the data strategy aligns with the business strategy and supports the business architecture.
    • Building and fostering a data-driven culture will accelerate and sustain adoption of, appetite for, and appreciation for data and hence drive the ROI on your various data investments.

    Impact and Result

    • Formulate a data strategy that stitches all of the pieces together to better position you to unlock the value in your data:
      • Establish the business context and value: Identify key business drivers for executing on an optimized data strategy, build compelling and relevant use cases, understand your organization’s culture and appetite for data, and ensure you have well-articulated vision, principles, and goals for your data strategy
      • Ensure you have a solid data foundation: Understand your current data environment, data management enablers, people, skill sets, roles, and structure. Know your strengths and weakness so you can optimize appropriately.
      • Formulate a sustainable data strategy: Round off your strategy with effective change management and communication for building and fostering a data-driven culture.

    Build a Robust and Comprehensive Data Strategy Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Data Strategy Research – A step-by-step document to facilitate the formulation of a data strategy that brings together the business context, data management foundation, people, and culture.

    Data should be at the foundation of your organization’s evolution. The transformational insights that executives and decision makers are constantly seeking to leverage can be unlocked with a data strategy that makes high-quality, trusted, and relevant data readily available to the users who need it.

    • Build a Robust and Comprehensive Data Strategy – Phases 1-3

    2. Data Strategy Stakeholder Interview Guide and Findings – A template to support you in your meetings or interviews with key stakeholders as you work on understanding the value of data within the various lines of business.

    This template will help you gather insights around stakeholder business goals and objectives, current data consumption practices, the types or domains of data that are important to them in supporting their business capabilities and initiatives, the challenges they face, and opportunities for data from their perspective.

    • Data Strategy Stakeholder Interview Guide and Findings

    3. Data Strategy Use Case Template – An exemplar template to demonstrate the business value of your data strategy.

    Data strategy optimization anchored in a value proposition will ensure that the data strategy focuses on driving the most valuable and critical outcomes in support of the organization’s enterprise strategy. The template will help you facilitate deep-dive sessions with key stakeholders for building use cases that are of demonstrable value not only to their relevant lines of business but also to the wider organization.

    • Data Strategy Use Case Template

    4. Chief Data Officer – A job description template that includes a detailed explication of the responsibilities and expectations of a CDO.

    Bring data to the C-suite by creating the Chief Data Officer role. This position is designed to bridge the gap between the business and IT by serving as a representative for the organization's data management practices and identifying how the organization can leverage data as a competitive advantage or corporate asset.

    • Chief Data Officer

    5. Data Strategy Document Template – A structured template to plan and document your data strategy outputs.

    Use this template to document and formulate your data strategy. Follow along with the sections of the blueprint Build a Robust and Comprehensive Data Strategy and complete the template as you progress.

    • Data Strategy Document Template
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Build a Robust and Comprehensive Data Strategy

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Establish Business Context and Value: Understand the Current Business Environment

    The Purpose

    Establish the business context for the business strategy.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Substantiates the “why” of the data strategy.

    Highlights the organization’s goals, objectives, and strategic direction the data must align with.

    Activities

    1.1 Data Strategy 101

    1.2 Intro to Tech’s Data Strategy Framework

    1.3 Data Strategy Value Proposition: Understand stakeholder’s strategic priorities and the alignment with data

    1.4 Discuss the importance of vision, mission, and guiding principles of the organization’s data strategy

    1.5 Understand the organization’s data culture – discuss Data Culture Survey results

    1.6 Examine Core Value Streams of Business Architecture

    Outputs

    Business context; strategic drivers

    Data strategy guiding principles

    Sample vision and mission statements

    Data Culture Diagnostic Results Analysis

    2 Business-Data Needs Discovery: Key Business Stakeholder Interviews

    The Purpose

    Build use cases of demonstrable value and understand the current environment.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    An understanding of the current maturity level of key capabilities.

    Use cases that represent areas of concern and/or high value and therefore need to be addressed.

    Activities

    2.1 Conduct key business stakeholder interviews to initiate the build of high-value business-data cases

    Outputs

    Initialized high-value business-data cases

    3 Understand the Current Data Environment & Practice: Analyze Data Capability and Practice Gaps and Develop Alignment Strategies

    The Purpose

    Build out a future state plan that is aimed at filling prioritized gaps and that informs a scalable roadmap for moving forward on treating data as an asset.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A target state plan, formulated with input from key stakeholders, for addressing gaps and for maturing capabilities necessary to strategically manage data.

    Activities

    3.1 Understand the current data environment: data capability assessment

    3.2 Understand the current data practice: key data roles, skill sets; operating model, organization structure

    3.3 Plan target state data environment and data practice

    Outputs

    Data capability assessment and roadmapping tool

    4 Align Business Needs with Data Implications: Initiate Roadmap Planning and Strategy Formulation

    The Purpose

    Consolidate business and data needs with consideration of external factors as well as internal barriers and enablers to the success of the data strategy. Bring all the outputs together for crafting a robust and comprehensive data strategy.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A consolidated view of business and data needs and the environment in which the data strategy will be operationalized.

    An analysis of the feasibility and potential risks to the success of the data strategy.

    Activities

    4.1 Analyze gaps between current- and target-state

    4.2 Initiate initiative, milestone and RACI planning

    4.3 Working session with Data Strategy Owner

    Outputs

    Data Strategy Next Steps Action Plan

    Relevant data strategy related templates (example: data practice patterns, data role patterns)

    Initialized Data Strategy on-a-Page

    Further reading

    Build a Robust and Comprehensive Data Strategy

    Key to building and fostering a data-driven culture.

    ANALYST PERSPECTIVE

    Data Strategy: Key to helping drive organizational innovation and transformation

    "In the dynamic environment in which we operate today, where we are constantly juggling disruptive forces, a well-formulated data strategy will prove to be a key asset in supporting business growth and sustainability, innovation, and transformation.

    Your data strategy must align with the organization’s business strategy, and it is foundational to building and fostering an enterprise-wide data-driven culture."

    Crystal Singh,

    Director – Research and Advisory

    Info-Tech Research Group

    Our understanding of the problem

    This Research is Designed For:

    • Chief data officers (CDOs), chief architects, VPs, and digital transformation directors and CIOs who are accountable for ensuring data can be leveraged as a strategic asset of the organization.

    This Research Will Help You:

    • Put a strategy in place to ensure data is available, accessible, well integrated, secured, of acceptable quality, and suitably visualized to fuel decision making by the organizations’ executives.
    • Align data management plans and investments with business requirements and the organization’s strategic plans.
    • Define the relevant roles for operationalizing your data strategy.

    This Research Will Also Assist:

    • Data architects and enterprise architects who have been tasked with supporting the formulation or optimization of the organization’s data strategy.
    • Business leaders creating plans for leveraging data in their strategic planning and business processes.
    • IT professionals looking to improve the environment that manages and delivers data.

    This Research Will Help Them:

    • Get a handle on the current situation of data within the organization.
    • Understand how the data strategy and its resulting initiatives will affect the operations, integration, and provisioning of data within the enterprise.

    Executive Summary

    Situation

    • The volume and variety of data that organizations have been collecting and producing have been growing exponentially and show no sign of slowing down. At the same time, business landscapes and models are evolving, and users and stakeholders are becoming more and more data centric, with maturing and demanding expectations.

    Complication

    • As organizations pivot in response to industry disruptions and changing landscapes, a reactive and piecemeal approach leads to data architectures and designs that fail to deliver real and measurable value to the business.
    • Despite the growing focus on data, many organizations struggle to develop a cohesive business-driven strategy for effectively managing and leveraging their data assets.

    Resolution

    Formulate a data strategy that stitches all of the pieces together to better position you to unlock the value in your data:

    • Establish the business context and value: Identify key business drivers for executing on an optimized data strategy, build compelling and relevant use cases, understand your organization’s culture and appetite for data, and ensure you have well-articulated vision, principles, and goals for your data strategy.
    • Ensure you have a solid data foundation: Understand your current data environment, data management enablers, people, skill sets, roles, and structure. Know your strengths and weakness so you can optimize appropriately.
    • Formulate a sustainable data strategy: Round off your strategy with effective change management and communication for building and fostering a data-driven culture.

    Info-Tech Insight

    1. As the CDO or equivalent data leader in your organization, a robust and comprehensive data strategy is the number one tool in your toolkit for delivering on your mandate of creating measurable business value from data.
    2. A data strategy should never be formulated disjointed from the business. Ensure the data strategy aligns with the business strategy and supports the business architecture.
    3. Building and fostering a data-driven culture will accelerate and sustain adoption of, appetite for, and appreciation for data and hence drive the ROI on your various data investments.

    Why do you need a data strategy?

    Your data strategy is the vehicle for ensuring data is poised to support your organization’s strategic objectives.

    The dynamic marketplace of today requires organizations to be responsive in order to gain or maintain their competitive edge and place in their industry.

    Organizations need to have that 360-degree view of what’s going on and what’s likely to happen.

    Disruptive forces often lead to changes in business models and require organizations to have a level of adaptability to remain relevant.

    To respond, organizations need to make decisions and should be able to turn to their data to gain insights for informing their decisions.

    A well-formulated and robust data strategy will ensure that your data investments bring you the returns by meeting your organization’s strategic objectives.

    Organizations need to be in a position where they know what’s going on with their stakeholders and anticipate what their stakeholders’ needs are going to be.

    Data cannot be fully leveraged without a cohesive strategy

    Most organizations today will likely have some form of data management in place, supported by some of the common roles such as DBAs and data analysts.

    Most will likely have a data architecture that supports some form of reporting.

    Some may even have a chief data officer (CDO), a senior executive who has a seat at the C-suite table.

    These are all great assets as a starting point BUT without a cohesive data strategy that stitches the pieces together and:

    • Effectively leverages these existing assets
    • Augments them with additional and relevant key roles and skills sets
    • Optimizes and fills in the gaps around your current data management enablers and capabilities for the growing volume and variety of data you’re collecting
    • Fully caters to real, high-value strategic organizational business needs

    you’re missing the mark – you are not fully leveraging the incredible value of your data.

    Cross-industry studies show that on average, less than half of an organization’s structured data is actively used in making decisions

    And, less than 1% of its unstructured data is analyzed or used at all. Furthermore, 80% of analysts' time is spent simply discovering and preparing, data with over 70% of employees having access to data they should not. Source: HBR, 2017

    Organizational drivers for a data strategy

    Your data strategy needs to align with your organizational strategy.

    Main Organizational Strategic Drivers:

    1. Stakeholder Engagement/Service Excellence
    2. Product and Service Innovations
    3. Operational Excellence
    4. Privacy, Risk, and Compliance Management

    “The companies who will survive and thrive in the future are the ones who will outlearn and out-innovate everyone else. It is no longer ‘survival of the fittest’ but ‘survival of the smartest.’ Data is the element that both inspires and enables this new form of rapid innovation.– Joel Semeniuk, 2016

    A sound data strategy is the key to unlocking the value in your organization’s data.

    Data should be at the foundation of your organization’s evolution.

    The transformational insights that executives are constantly seeking to leverage can be unlocked with a data strategy that makes high-quality, well-integrated, trustworthy, relevant data readily available to the business users who need it.

    Whether hoping to gain a better understanding of your business, trying to become an innovator in your industry, or having a compliance and regulatory mandate that needs to be met, any organization can get value from its data through a well-formulated, robust, and cohesive data strategy.

    According to a leading North American bank, “More than one petabyte of new data, equivalent to about 1 million gigabytes” is entering the bank’s systems every month. – The Wall Street Journal, 2019

    “Although businesses are at many different stages in unlocking the power of data, they share a common conviction that it can make or break an enterprise.”– Jim Love, ITWC CIO and Chief Digital Officer, IT World Canada, 2018

    Data is a strategic organizational asset and should be treated as such

    The expression “Data is an asset” or any other similar sentiment has long been heard.

    With such hype, you would have expected data to have gotten more attention in the boardrooms. You would have expected to see its value reflected on financial statements as a result of its impact in driving things like acquisition, retention, product and service development and innovation, market growth, stakeholder satisfaction, relationships with partners, and overall strategic success of the organization.

    The time has surely come for data to be treated as the asset it is.

    “Paradoxically, “data” appear everywhere but on the balance sheet and income statement.”– HBR, 2018

    “… data has traditionally been perceived as just one aspect of a technology project; it has not been treated as a corporate asset.”– “5 Essential Components of a Data Strategy,” SAS

    According to Anil Chakravarthy, who is the CEO of Informatica and has a strong vantage point on how companies across industries leverage data for better business decisions, “what distinguishes the most successful businesses … is that they have developed the ability to manage data as an asset across the whole enterprise.”– McKinsey & Company, 2019

    How data is perceived in today’s marketplace

    Data is being touted as the oil of the digital era…

    But just like oil, if left unrefined, it cannot really be used.

    "Data is the new oil." – Clive Humby, Chief Data Scientist

    Source: Joel Semeniuk, 2016

    Enter your data strategy.

    Data is being perceived as that key strategic asset in your organization for fueling innovation and transformation.

    Your data strategy is what allows you to effectively mine, refine, and use this resource.

    “The world’s most valuable resource is no longer oil, but data.”– The Economist, 2017

    “Modern innovation is now dependent upon this data.”– Joel Semeniuk, 2016

    “The better the data, the better the resulting innovation and impact.”– Joel Semeniuk, 2016

    What is it in it for you? What opportunities can data help you leverage?

    GOVERNMENT

    Leveraging data as a strategic asset for the benefit of citizens.

    • The strategic use of data can enable governments to provide higher-quality services.
    • Direct resources appropriately and harness opportunities to improve impact.
    • Make better evidence-informed decisions and better understand the impact of programs so that funds can be directed to where they are most likely to deliver the best results.
    • Maintain legitimacy and credibility in an increasingly complex society.
    • Help workers adapt and be competitive in a changing labor market.
    • A data strategy would help protect citizens from the misuse of their data.

    Source: Privy Council Office, Government of Canada, 2018

    What is it in it for you? What opportunities can data help you leverage?

    FINANCIAL

    Leveraging data to boost traditional profit and loss levers, find new sources of growth, and deliver the digital bank.

    • One bank used credit card transactional data (from its own terminals and those of other banks) to develop offers that gave customers incentives to make regular purchases from one of the bank’s merchants. This boosted the bank’s commissions, added revenue for its merchants, and provided more value to the customer (McKinsey & Company, 2017).
    • In terms of enhancing productivity, a bank used “new algorithms to predict the cash required at each of its ATMs across the country and then combined this with route-optimization techniques to save money” (McKinsey & Company, 2017).

    A European bank “turned to machine-learning algorithms that predict which currently active customers are likely to reduce their business with the bank.” The resulting understanding “gave rise to a targeted campaign that reduced churn by 15 percent” (McKinsey & Company, 2017).

    A leading Canadian bank has built a marketplace around their data – they have launched a data marketplace where they have productized the bank’s data. They are providing data – as a product – to other units within the bank. These other business units essentially represent internal customers who are leveraging the product, which is data.

    Through the use of data and advanced analytics, “a top bank in Asia discovered unsuspected similarities that allowed it to define 15,000 microsegments in its customer base. It then built a next-product-to-buy model that increased the likelihood to buy three times over.” Several sets of big data were explored, including “customer demographics and key characteristics, products held, credit-card statements, transaction and point-of-sale data, online and mobile transfers and payments, and credit-bureau data” (McKinsey & Company, 2017).

    What is it in it for you? What opportunities can data help you leverage?

    HEALTHCARE

    Leveraging data and analytics to prevent deadly infections

    The fifth-largest health system in the US and the largest hospital provider in California uses a big data and advanced analytics platform to predict potential sepsis cases at the earliest stages, when intervention is most helpful.

    Using the Sepsis Bio-Surveillance Program, this hospital provider monitors 120,000 lives per month in 34 hospitals and manages 7,500 patients with potential sepsis per month.

    Collecting data from the electronic medical records of all patients in its facilities, the solution uses natural language processing (NLP) and a rules engine to continually monitor factors that could indicate a sepsis infection. In high-probability cases, the system sends an alarm to the primary nurse or physician.

    Since implementing the big data and predictive analytics system, this hospital provider has seen a significant improvement in the mortality and the length of stay in ICU for sepsis patients.

    At 28 of the hospitals which have been on the program, sepsis mortality rates have dropped an average of 5%.

    With patients spending less time in the ICU, cost savings were also realized. This is significant, as sepsis is the costliest condition billed to Medicare, the second costliest billed to Medicaid and the uninsured, and the fourth costliest billed to private insurance.

    Source: SAS, 2019

    What is it in it for you? What opportunities can data help you leverage?

    RETAIL

    Leveraging data to better understand customer preferences, predict purchasing, drive customer experience, and optimize supply and demand planning.

    Netflix is an example of a big brand that uses big data analytics for targeted advertising. With over 100 million subscribers, the company collects large amounts of data. If you are a subscriber, you are likely familiar with their suggestions messages of the next series or movie you should catch up on. These suggestions are based on your past search data and watch data. This data provides Netflix with insights into your interests and preferences for viewing (Mentionlytics, 2018).

    “For the retail industry, big data means a greater understanding of consumer shopping habits and how to attract new customers.”– Ron Barasch, Envestnet | Yodlee, 2019

    The business case for data – moving from platitudes to practicality

    When building your business case, consider the following:

    • What is the most effective way to communicate the business case to executives?
    • How can CDOs and other data leaders use data to advance their organizations’ corporate strategy?
    • What does your data estate look like? Are you looking to leverage and drive value from your semi-structured and unstructured data assets?
    • Does your current organizational culture support a data-driven one? Does the organization have a history of managing change effectively?
    • How do changing privacy and security expectations alter the way businesses harvest, save, use, and exchange data?

    “We’re the converted … We see the value in data. The battle is getting executive teams to see it our way.”– Ted Maulucci, President of SmartONE Solutions Inc. IT World Canada, 2018

    Where do you stack up? What is your current data management maturity?

    Info-Tech’s IT Maturity Ladder denotes the different levels of maturity for an IT department and its different functions. What is the current state of your data management capability?

    Innovator - Transforms the Business. Business Partner - Expands the Business. Trusted Operator - Optimizes the Business. Firefighter - Supports the Business. Unstable - Struggles to Support.

    Info-Tech Insight

    You are best positioned to successfully execute on a data strategy if you are currently at or above the Trusted Operator level. If you find yourself still at the Unstable or Firefighter stage, your efforts are best spent on ensuring you can fulfill your day-to-day data and data management demands. Improving this capability will help build a strong data management foundation.

    Guiding principles of a data strategy

    Value of Clearly Defined Data Principles

    • Guiding principles help define the culture and characteristics of your practice by describing your beliefs and philosophy.
    • Guiding principles act as the heart of your data strategy, helping to shape initiative plans and day-to-day behaviors related to the use and treatment of the organization’s data assets.

    “Organizational culture can accelerate the application of analytics, amplify its power, and steer companies away from risky outcomes.”– McKinsey, 2018

    Build a Robust and Comprehensive Data Strategy

    Business Strategy and Current Environment connect with the Data Strategy. Data Strategy includes: Organizational Drivers and Data Value, Data Strategy Objectives and Guiding Principles, Data Strategy Vision and Mission, Data Strategy Roadmap, People: Roles and Organizational Structure, Data Culture and Data Literacy, Data Management and Tools, Risk and Feasibility.

    Follow Info-Tech’s methodology for effectively leveraging the value out of your data

    Some say it’s the new oil. Or the currency of the new business landscape. Others describe it as the fuel of the digital economy. But we don’t need platitudes — we need real ways to extract the value from our data. – Jim Love, CIO and Chief Digital Officer, IT World Canada, 2018

    1. Business Context. 2. Data and Resources Foundation. 3. Effective Data Strategy

    Our practical step-by-step approach helps you to formulate a data strategy that delivers business value.

    1. Establish Business Context and Value: In this phase, you will determine and substantiate the business drivers for optimizing the data strategy. You will identify the business drivers that necessitate the data strategy optimization and examine your current organizational data culture. This will be key to ensuring the fruits of your optimization efforts are being used. You will also define the vision, mission, and guiding principles and build high-value use cases for the data strategy.
    2. Ensure You Have a Solid Data and Resources Foundation: This phase will help you ensure you have a solid data and resources foundation for operationalizing your data strategy. You will gain an understanding of your current environment in terms of data management enablers and the required resources portfolio of key people, roles, and skill sets.
    3. Formulate a Sustainable Data Strategy: In this phase, you will bring the pieces together for formulating an effective data strategy. You will evaluate and prioritize the use cases built in Phase 1, which summarize the alignment of organizational goals with data needs. You will also create your strategic plan, considering change management and communication.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    “Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

    Workshop

    “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

    Consulting

    “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks are used throughout all four options.

    Build Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}605|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Selection & Implementation
    • Parent Category Link: /selection-and-implementation
    • Given the increasing complexity of software implementations, you are continually challenged with staying above water with your current team.
    • In addition, rapid changes in the business make maintaining project sponsors’ engagement challenging.
    • Project sprawl across the organization has created a situation where each project lead tracks progress in their own way. This makes it difficult for leadership to identify what was successful – and what wasn’t.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    An effective enterprise application implementation playbook is not just a list of steps, but a comprehensive view of what is necessary to support your implementation. This starts with a people-first approach. Start by asking about sponsors, stakeholders, and goals. Without asking these questions first, the implementation will be set up for failure, regardless of the technology, processes, and tools available.

    Impact and Result

    Follow these steps to build your enterprise application playbook:

    • Define your sponsor, map out your stakeholders, and lay out the vision, goals and objectives for your project.
    • Detail the scope, metrics, and the team that will make it happen.
    • Outline the steps and processes that will carry you through the implementation.

    Build Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Build Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook Deck - Your implementation doesn’t start with technology, but with an effective plan that the team can align on.

    This blueprint provides the steps necessary to build your own enterprise application implementation playbook that can be deployed and leveraged by your implementation teams.

    • Build Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook – Phases 1-3

    2. Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook – The key output from leveraging this research is a completed implementation playbook.

    This is the main playbook that you build through the exercises defined in the blueprint.

    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook

    3. Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook - Timeline Tool – Supporting tool that captures the project timeline information, issue log, and follow-up dashboard.

    This tool provides input into the playbook around project timelines and planning.

    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook - Timeline Tool

    4. Light Project Change Request Form Template – This tool will help you record the requested change, allow assess the impact of the change and proceed the approval process.

    This provides input into the playbook around managing change requests

    • Light Project Change Request Form Template

    Infographic

    Workshop: Build Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Understand the Project

    The Purpose

    Lay out the overall objectives, stakeholders, and governance structure for the project.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Align everyone on the sponsor, key stakeholders, vision, and goals for your project

    Activities

    1.1 Select the project sponsor.

    1.2 Identify your stakeholders.

    1.3 Align on a project vision.

    1.4 List your guiding principles.

    1.5 Confirm your goals and objectives for the implementation project.

    1.6 Define the project governance structure.

    Outputs

    Project sponsor has been selected.

    Project stakeholders have been identified and mapped with their roles and responsibilities.

    Vision has been defined.

    Guiding principles have been defined.

    Articulated goals and objectives.

    Detailed governance structure.

    2 Set up for Success

    The Purpose

    Define the elements of the playbook that provide scope and boundaries for the implementation.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Align the implementation team on the scope for the project and how the team should operate during the implementation.

    Activities

    2.1 Gather and review requirements, with an agreed to scope.

    2.2 Define metrics for your project.

    2.3 Define and document the risks that can impact the project.

    2.4 Establish team composition and identify the team.

    2.5 Detail your OCM structure, resources, roles, and responsibilities.

    2.6 Define requirements for training.

    2.7 Create a communications plan for stakeholder groups and delivery teams.

    Outputs

    Requirements for enterprise application implementation with an agreed-to scope.

    Metrics to help measure what success looks like for the implementation.

    Articulated list of possible risks during the implementation.

    The team responsible and accountable for implementation is identified.

    Details of your organization’s change management process.

    Outline of training required.

    An agreed-to plan for communication of project status.

    3 Document Your Plan

    The Purpose

    With the structure and boundaries in place, we can now lay out the details on the implementation plan.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A high-level plan is in place, including next steps and a process on running retrospectives.

    Activities

    3.1 Define your implementation steps.

    3.2 Create templates to enable follow-up throughout the project.

    3.3 Decide on the tracking tools to help during your implementation.

    3.4 Define the follow-up processes.

    3.5 Define project progress communication.

    3.6 Create a Change request process.

    3.7 Define your retrospective process for continuous improvement.

    3.8 Prepare a closure document for sign-off.

    Outputs

    An agreed to high-level implementation plan.

    Follow-up templates to enable more effective follow-ups.

    Shortlist of tracking tools to leverage during the implementation.

    Defined processes to enable follow-up.

    Defined project progress communication.

    A process for managing change requests.

    A process and template for running retrospectives.

    A technique and template for closure and sign-off.

    Further reading

    Build Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook

    Your implementation doesn’t start with technology, but with an effective plan that the team can align on.

    Analyst Perspective

    Your implementation is not just about technology, but about careful planning, collaboration, and control.

    Recardo de Oliveira

    A successful enterprise application implementation requires more than great software; it requires a clear line of sight to the people, processes, metrics, and tools that can help make this happen.

    Additionally, every implementation is unique with its own set of challenges. Working through these challenges requires a tailored approach taking many factors into account. Building out your playbook for your implementation is an important initial step before diving head-first into technology.

    Regardless of whether you use an implementation partner, a playbook ensures that you don’t lose your enterprise application investment before you even get started!

    Ricardo de Oliveira

    Research Director,
    Application Delivery and Management
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    • Given the increasing complexity of software implementations, you are continually challenged with staying above water with your current team.
    • Rapid changes in the business make maintaining project sponsors’ engagement challenging.
    • Project sprawl across the organization has created a situation where project leads track progress in their own way. This makes it difficult for leadership to identify what was successful (and what wasn’t).

    Common Obstacles

    • Your best process experts are the same people you need to keep the business running. The business cannot afford to have its best people pulled into the implementation for long periods of time.
    • Enterprise application implementations generate huge organizational changes and the adoption of the new systems and processes resulting from these projects are quite difficult.
    • People are generally resistant to change, especially large, transformational changes that will impact the day-to-day way of doing things.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    • Build your enterprise application implementation playbook. Follow these steps to build your enterprise application playbook:
      • Define your sponsor, map out your stakeholders, and lay out the vision, goals, and objectives for your project.
      • Detail the scope, metrics, and the team that will make it happen.
      • Detail the steps and processes that will carry you through the implementation

    Info-Tech Insight

    An effective enterprise application implementation playbook is not just a list of steps; it is a comprehensive view of what is necessary to support your implementation. This starts with a people-first approach. Start by asking about sponsors, stakeholders, and goals. Without asking these questions first, the implementation will be set up for failure, regardless of the technology, processes, and tools available.

    Enterprise Applications Lifescycle Advisory Services. Strategy, selection, implementation, optimization and operations.

    Insight summary

    Building an effective playbook starts with asking the right questions, not jumping straight into the technical details.

    • This blueprint provides the steps required to lay out an implementation playbook to align the team on what is necessary to support the implementation.
    • Build your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook by:
      • Aligning and confirming project’s goals, stakeholders, governance and team.
      • Clearly defining what is in and out of scope for the project and the risks involved.
      • Building up a strong change management process.
      • Providing the tools and processes to keep track of the project.
      • Pulling it all together into an actionable playbook.

    Grapsh showing 39%

    Lack of planning is the reason that 39% of projects fail. Poor project planning can be disastrous: The consequences are usually high costs and time overruns.

    Graph showing 20%

    Almost 20% of IT projects can fail so badly that they can become a threat to a company’s existence. Lack of proper planning, poor communication, and poorly defined goals all contribute to the failure of projects.

    Graph showig 2.5%

    A PwC study of over 10,640 projects found that a tiny portion of companies – 2.5% – completed 100% of their projects successfully. These failures extract a heavy cost – failed IT projects alone cost the United States $50-$150B in lost revenue and productivity.

    Source: Forbes, 2020

    Planning and control are key to enterprise project success

    An estimated 70% of large-scale corporate projects fail largely due to a lack of change management infrastructure, proper oversight, and regular performance check-ins to track progress (McKinsey, 2015).

    Table showing that 88% of projects completed on time, 90% completed within budget and 92% meet original goals. 68% of projects have scope creep, 24% deemed failures and 46% experience budget lose when project fails

    “A survey published in HBR found that the average IT project overran its budget by 27%. Moreover, at least one in six IT projects turns into a ‘black swan’ with a cost overrun of 200% and a schedule overrun of 70%. Kmart’s massive $1.2B failed IT modernization project, for instance, was a big contributor to its bankruptcy.”

    Source: Forbes, 2020

    Sponsor commitment directly improves project success.

    Having the right sponsor significantly improves your chances of success across many different dimensions:

    1. On-time delivery
    2. Delivering within budget
    3. Delivered within an agreed-to scope
    4. Delivered with sufficient quality.
    Graph that shows Project success scores versus sponsor involvement in change communication. Shows increase for projects on time, projects on budget, within scope and overall quality.

    Source: Info-Tech, PPM Current State Scorecard Diagnostic

    Executive Brief Case Study

    Chocolate manufacturer implementing a new ERP

    INDUSTRY

    Consumer Products

    SOURCE

    Carlton, 2021

    Challenge

    Not every ERP ends in success. This case study reviews the failure of Hershey, a 147-year-old confectioner, headquartered in Hershey Pennsylvania. The enterprise saw the implementation of an ERP platform as being central to its future growth.

    Solution

    Consequently, rather than approaching its business challenge on the basis of an iterative approach, it decided to execute a holistic plan, involving every operating center in the company. Subsequently, SAP was engaged to implement a $10 million systems upgrade; however, management problems emerged immediately.

    Results

    The impact of this decision was significant, and the company was unable to conduct business because virtually every process, policy, and operating mechanism was in flux simultaneously. The consequence was the loss of $150 million in revenue, a 19% reduction in share price, and the loss of 12% in international market share.

    Remember: Poor management can scupper implementation, even when you have selected the perfect system.

    A successful software implementation provides more than simply immediate business value…

    It can build competitive advantage.

    • When software projects fail, it can jeopardize an organization’s financial standing and reputation, and in some severe cases, it can bring the company down altogether.
    • Rarely do projects fail for a single reason, but by understanding the pitfalls, developing a risk mitigation plan, closely monitoring risks, and self-evaluating during critical milestones, you can increase the probability of delivering on time, on budget, and with the intended benefits.

    Benefits are not limited to just delivering on time. Some others include:

    • Building organizational delivery competence and overall agility.
    • The opportunity to start an inventory of best practices, eventually building them into a center of excellence.
    • Developing a competitive advantage by maximizing software value and continuously transforming the business.
    • An opportunity to develop a competent pool of staff capable of executing on projects and managing organizational change.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook – Timeline Tool

    Supporting template that captures the project timeline information, issue log, and follow-up dashboard.

    Info-Tech: Project Planning and Monitoring Tool.
    Light Project Change Request Form Template

    This tool will help you record the requested change, and allow you to assess the impact of the change and proceed with the approval process.

    Info-Tech: Light change request form template.

    Key deliverable:

    Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook

    Record the results from the exercises to define the steps for a successful implementation.

    Build your enterprise application implementation playbook.

    Info-Tech’s methodology for Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook

    Phase Steps

    1. Understand the Project

    1. Identify the project sponsor
    2. Define project stakeholders
    3. Review project vision and guiding principles
    4. Review project objectives
    5. Establish project governance

    2. Set up for success

    1. Review project scope
    2. Define project metrics
    3. Prepare for project risks
    4. Identify the project team
    5. Define your change management process

    3. Document your plan

    1. Develop a master project plan
    2. Define a follow-up plan
    3. Define the follow-up process
    4. Understand what’s next
    Phase Outcomes
    • Project sponsor has been selected
    • Project stakeholders have been identified and mapped with their roles and responsibilities.
    • Vision, guiding principles, goals objectives, and governance have been defined
    • Project scope has been confirmed
    • Project metrics to identify successful implementation has been defined
    • Risks have been assessed and articulated.
    • Identified project team
    • An agreed-to change management process
    • Project plan covering the overall implementation is in place, including next steps and retrospectives

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful."

    Guided Implementation

    "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track."

    Workshop

    "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place."

    Consulting

    "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostic and consistent frameworks are used throughout all four options.

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    The three phases of guided implementation.

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization. A typical GI is between 8 to 12 calls over the course of 4 to 6 months.

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.

    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889 Activities and deliverables for each module of the workshop. Module 1: understanding the project, Module 2: Set up for success, Modeule 3: Document your plan, and Post Workshop: Next steps and Wrap-up(offsite).

    Phase 1

    Understand the project

    3 phases, phase 1 is highlighted.

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    1.1 Identify the project sponsor

    1.2 Identify project stakeholders

    1.3 Review project vision and guiding principles

    1.4 Review project objectives

    1.5 Establish project governance

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    Step 1.1

    Identify the project sponsor

    Activities

    1.1.1 Define the project sponsor's responsibilities

    1.1.2 Shortlist potential sponsors

    1.1.3 Select the project sponsor

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    Outcomes of this step

    Selected sponsor.

    Sponsor commitment directly improves project success.

    Having the right sponsor significantly improves your chances of success across many different dimensions:

    1. On-time delivery
    2. Delivering within budget
    3. Delivered within an agreed-to scope
    4. Delivered with sufficient quality.

    Graph that shows Project success scores versus sponsor involvement in change communication. Shows increase for projects on time, projects on budget, within scope and overall quality.

    Source: Info-Tech, PPM Current State Scorecard Diagnostic

    Typical project sponsor responsibilities

    • Help define the business goals of their projects before they start.
    • Provide guidance and support to the project manager and the project team throughout the project management lifecycle.
    • Ensure that sufficient financial resources are available for their projects.
    • Resolve problems and issues that require authority beyond that of the project manager.
    • Ensure that the business objectives of their projects are achieved and communicated.

    For further discussion on sponsor responsibilities, use Info-Tech’s blueprint, Drive Business Value With a Right-Sized Project Gating Process

    Portrait of head with multiple layers representing the responsibilities of a sponsor. From top down: Define business goals, provide guidance, ensure human ad financial resources, resolve problems and issues.

    1.1.1 Define the project sponsor’s responsibilities

    0.5-1 hour

    1. Discuss the minimum requirements for a sponsor at your organization.
    2. As a group, brainstorm the criteria necessary for an individual to be a project sponsor:
      1. Is there a limit to the number of projects they can sponsor at one time?
      2. Is there a minimum number of hours they must be available to the project team?
      3. Do they have to be at a certain seniority level in the organization?
      4. What is their role at each stage of the project lifecycle?
    3. Document these criteria on a whiteboard.
    4. Record the sponsor’s responsibilities in section 1.1 of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Download Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook

    Input

    Output

    • Requirements for a sponsor
    • Your responsibilities as a sponsor

    Materials

    Participants

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook
    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    1.1.1 Define the project sponsor’s responsibilities (Continued)

    Example

    Project sponsor responsibilities.

    1.1.2 Shortlist potential sponsors

    0.5-1 hour

    1. Based on the responsibilities defined in Exercise 1.1.1, produce a list of the potential sponsors.
    2. Record the sponsor’s shortlist in section 1.2 of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Download Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook

    Input

    Output

    • Characteristics of a sponsor
    • Your list of candidates

    Materials

    Participants

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook
    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    1.1.2 Shortlist potential sponsors (Continued)

    Example

    Shortlist of potential sponsors. 6 names listed with checkmarks on criteria ranking.

    Don’t forget, the project team is there to support the sponsor

    Given the burden of the sponsor role, the project team is committed to doing their best to facilitate a successful outcome.

    Project Success: Follow best practices, escalate issues, stay focused, communicate, adapt to change.

    • Follow the framework set out by the governance group at the organization to drive efficiency on the project.
    • Ensure stakeholders with proper authority are notified of issues that occur during the project.
    • Stay focused on the project tasks to drive quality on the deliverables and avoid rework after the project.
    • Communicate within the project team to drive coordination of tasks, complete deliverables, and avoid resource waste.
    • Changes are more common than not; the team must be prepared to adjust plans and stay agile to adapt to changes for the project.

    Seek the key characteristics of a sponsor

    Man walking up stairs denoting characteristics of a good sponsor. First step: Leader, second step: Strong Communicator, third step: knowledgeable, fourth step: problem solver, fifth step: delegator, final step: dedicated.

    1.1.3 Select the project sponsor

    0.5-1 hour

    1. Review the characteristics and the list of potential candidates.
    2. Assess availability, suitability, and desire of the selected sponsor.
    3. Record the selected sponsor in section 1.3 of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Download Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook

    Input

    Output

    • List of candidates
    • Characteristics of a sponsor
    • Your selected sponsor

    Materials

    Participants

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook
    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    1.1.3 Select the project sponsor (Continued)

    Example

    Name of example sponsor with their key traits listed.

    Step 1.2

    Identify the project stakeholders

    Activities

    1.2.1 Identify your stakeholders

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    Outcomes of this step

    Stakeholders’ management plan

    How to find the right stakeholders

    Start with the obvious candidates, but keep an open mind.

    How to find stakeholders

    • Talk to your stakeholders and ask who else you should be talking to, to discover additional stakeholders and ensure you don’t miss anyone.
    • Less obvious stakeholders can be found by conducting various types of trace analysis, i.e. following various paths flowing from your initiative through to the path’s logical conclusion.

    Create a stakeholder network map for your application implementation

    Follow the trail of breadcrumbs from your direct stakeholders to their influencers to uncover hidden stakeholders.

    Stakeholder network map showing direction of professional influence as well as bidirectional, informal influence relationships.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Your stakeholder map defines the influence landscape your enterprise application operates in. It is every bit as important as the teams who enhance, support, and operate your applications directly.

    Use connectors to determine who may be influencing your direct stakeholders. They may not have any formal authority within the organization, but they may have substantial informal relationships with your stakeholders.

    Understand how to navigate the complex web of stakeholders

    Identify which stakeholders to include and what their level of involvement should be during requirements elicitation based on relevant topic expertise.

    Graph showing influence vs. interest, divided into 4 quadrants. Low influence and intersest is labeled: Monitor, low influence and high interest is labeled: Keep informed, High influence and low interest is labeled: Keep satisfied, and high influence and high interest is labeled: Involve closely

    Large-scale projects require the involvement of many stakeholders from all corners and levels of the organization, including project sponsors, IT, end users, and business stakeholders. Consider the influence and interest of stakeholders in contributing to the requirements elicitation process and involve them accordingly.

    Map the organization’s stakeholders

    List of various stakeholder titles. As well as a graph showing the influence vs involvement of each stakeholder title. Influence and interest is divided into 4 quadrants: Monitor, Keep informed, keep satisfied, and involve closely.

    1.2.1 Identify your stakeholders

    1-2 hours

    1. As a group, identify all the project stakeholders. A stakeholder may be an individual such as the CEO or CFO, or it may be a group such as front-line employees.
    2. Map each stakeholder on the quadrant based on their expected influence and involvement in the project
    3. Identify stakeholders and add them to the list.
    4. Record the stakeholders list in section 1.4 of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.
    5. Download Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook

      Input

      Output

      • Types of stakeholders
      • Your stakeholders initial list

      Materials

      Participants

      • Whiteboard/flip charts
      • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook
      • Project team
      • Operations
      • SMEs
      • Team lead and facilitators
      • IT leaders

    1.2.1 Identify your stakeholders(Continued)

    Example

    Table with rows of stakeholders: Customer, End Users, IT, Vendor and other listed. Columns provide: description, examples, value and involvement level of each stakeholder.

    Step 1.3

    Review project vision and guiding principles

    Activities

    1.3.1 Align on a project vision

    1.3.2 List your guiding principles

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    Outcomes of this step

    Project vision and guiding principles

    Vision and guiding principles

    GUIDING PRINCIPLES

    Guiding principles are high-level rules of engagement that help to align stakeholders from the outset. Determine guiding principles to shape the scope and ensure stakeholders have the same vision.

    Creating Guiding Principles

    Guiding principles should be constructed as full sentences. These statements should be able to guide decisions.

    EXAMPLES
    • [Organization] is implementing an ERP system to streamline processes and reduce redundancies, saving time and money.
    • [Organization] is implementing an ERP to integrate disparate systems and rationalize the application portfolio.
    • [Organization] is aiming at taking advantage of industry best practices and strives to minimize the level of customization required in solution.

    Questions to Ask

    1. What is a strong statement that will help guide decision making throughout the life of the ERP project?
    2. What are your overarching requirements for business processes?
    3. What do you ultimately want to achieve?
    4. What is a statement that will ensure all stakeholders are on the same page for the project?

    1.3.1 Align on a project vision

    1-2 hours

    1. As a group, discuss whether you want to create a separate project vision statement or restate your corporate vision and/or goals.
      1. A project vision statement will provide project-guiding principles, encompass the project objectives, and give a rationale for the project.
      2. Using the corporate vision/goals will remind the business and IT that the project is to implement an enterprise application that supports and enhances the organizational objectives.
    2. Record the project vision in section 1.5 of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Download Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook

    Input

    Output

    • Project vision statement defined during strategy building
    • Your project vision

    Materials

    Participants

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook
    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    1.3.1 Align on a project vision (Continued)

    Example

    Project Vision

    We, [Organization], will select and implement an integrated software suite that enhances the growth and profitability of the organization through streamlined global business processes, real-time data-driven decisions, increased employee productivity, and IT investment protection.

    Guiding principles examples

    The guiding principles will help guide your decision-making process. These can be adjusted to align with your internal language.

    • Support business agility: A flexible and adaptable integrated business system providing a seamless user experience.
    • Use best practices: Do not recreate or replicate what we have today; focus on modernization. Exercise customization governance by focusing on those customizations that are strategically differentiating.
    • Automate: Take manual work out where we can, empowering staff and improving productivity through automation and process efficiencies.
    • Stay focused: Focus on scope around core business capabilities. Maintain scope control. Prioritize demand in line with the strategy.
    • Strive for "one source of truth": Unify data model and integrate processes where possible. Assess integration needs carefully.

    1.3.2 List your guiding principles

    1-2 hours

    1. Start with the guiding principles defined during the strategy building.
    2. Review each of the sample guiding principles provided and ask the following questions:
      1. Do we agree with the statement?
      2. Is this statement framed in the language we use internally? Does everyone agree on the meaning of the statement?
      3. Will this statement help guide our decision-making process?
    3. Record the guiding principles in section 1.6 of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Download Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook

    Input

    Output

    • Guiding principles defined during strategy building
    • Your guiding principles

    Materials

    Participants

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook
    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    1.3.2 List your guiding principles (Continued)

    Example

    Guiding principals: Support business agility, use best practices, automate, stay focused, strive for `one source truth`.

    Step 1.4

    Review project objectives

    Activities

    1.4.1 Confirm your goals and objectives for the implementation project

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    Outcomes of this step

    The objectives of the implementation project

    Review the elements of the project charter

    Leverage completed deliverables to get project managers started down the path of success.

    Deliverables of project chaters for PMs. Project purpose, scope, logistics and sign-off.

    1.4.1 List your guiding principles

    1-2 hours

    1. Articulate the high-level objectives of the project. (What are the goals of the project?)
    2. Elicit the business benefits the sponsor is committed to achieving. (What are the business benefits of the project?)
    3. Record Project goals and objectives in section 1.7 of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Download Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook

    Input

    Output

    • Your BizDevOps objectives and metrics
    • Understanding of various collaboration methods, such as Scrum, Kanban, and Scrumban
    • Your chosen collaboration method

    Materials

    Participants

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook
    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    1.4.1 Confirm your goals and objectives for the implementation project (Continued)

    Example:

    Project Objectives: End-user visibility, New business development, employee experience. Business Benefits for each objective listed.

    Step 1.5

    Establish project governance

    Activities

    1.5.1 Define the project governance structure

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    Outcomes of this step

    Approach to build an effective project governance

    1.5.1 List your guiding principles

    0.5-1 hour

    1. Identify the IT governance structure in place today and document the high-level function of each body (councils, steering committees, review boards, centers of excellence, etc.).
    2. Identify and document the existing enterprise applications governance structure, roles, and responsibilities (if any exist).
    3. Identify gaps and document the desired enterprise applications governance structure, roles, and responsibilities.
    4. Record the project governance structure in section 1.8 of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Download Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook

    Input

    Output

    • IT governance structure
    • Your project governance structure

    Materials

    Participants

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook
    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    Governance is NOT management

    Three levels of governance: Team Level, Steering Committee Level, and Executive Governance Level.

    Info-Tech Insight

    You won’t get engagement unless there is a sense of accountability. Do not leave this vague. Accountability needs to be assigned to specific individuals in your organization to ensure the system development achieves what was intended by your organization and not what your system integrator (SI) intended.

    Who is accountable?

    Too many assumptions are made that the SI is accountable for all implementation activities and deliverables – this is simply untrue. All activities can be better planned for, and misunderstandings can be avoided, with a clear line of sight on roles and responsibilities and the documentation that will support these assumptions.

    Discuss, define, and document roles and responsibilities:
    • For each role (e.g. executive sponsor, delivery manager, test lead, conversion lead), clearly articulate the responsibilities of the role, who is accountable for fulfillment, and whether it’s a client role, SI role, or both.
    • Articulate the purpose of each deliverable clearly, define which individual or team has responsibility for it, and document who is expected to contribute.
    • Empower the team by granting them the authority to make decisions. Ease their reluctance to think outside the box for fear of stakeholder or user backlash.
    • The implementation cannot and will not be transformative if the wrong people are involved or if the right people have not been given the tools required to succeed in their role.

    1.5.2 List your guiding principles

    0.5-1 hour

    1. Assess the skills necessary for an enterprise implementation. Inventory the competencies required for an enterprise implementation team. Map your internal resources to each competency as applicable.
    2. Select your internal implementation team. Determine who needs to be involved closely with the implementation. Key stakeholders should also be considered as members of your implementation team.
    3. Identify the number of external consultants/support required for implementation. Consider your in-house skills, timeline, integration environment complexity, and cost constraints as you make your resourcing plan.
    4. Record governance team roles and responsibilities in 1.9 section of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Download Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook

    Input

    Output

    • Available resources (internal, external, contract)
    • Your governance structure roles and responsibilities

    Materials

    Participants

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook
    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    1.5.2 Define governance team roles and responsibilities (Continued)

    Example

    Governance team roles and their responsibilities.

    Phase 2

    Set up for success

    3 phases, phase 2 is highlighted.

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    2.1. Review project scope

    2.2. Define project metrics

    2.3. Prepare for project risks

    2.4. Identify the project team

    2.5. Define your change management process

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    Step 2.1

    Review project scope

    Activities

    2.1.1 Gather and review requirements

    2.1.2 Confirm your scope for implementation

    2.1.3 Formulate a scope statement

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    Outcomes of this step

    The project scope

    Requirements are key to defining scope

    Project scope management includes the processes required to ensure that the project includes all and only the work required to complete the project successfully. Therefore, managing project scope is about defining and controlling what is and is not included in the project.

    PMBOK defines requirements as “conditions or capabilities that are to be met by the project or present in the product, service, or result to satisfy an agreement or other formally imposed specification.” Detailed requirements should be gathered and elicited in order to provide the basis for defining the project scope.

    70% of projects fail due to poor requirements, organizations using poor practices spent 62% more, 4th highest correlation to high IT performance is requirements gathering.

    Well-executed requirements gathering results in:

    • Consistent approach from project to project, resulting in more predictable outcomes.
    • Solutions that meet the business need on the surface and under the hood.
    • Reduce risk for fast-tracked projects by establishing a right-sized approach.
    • Requirements team that can drive process improvement and improved execution.
    • Confidence when exploring solution alternatives.

    Poorly executed requirements gathering results in:

    • IT receiving the blame for any project shortcomings or failures.
    • Business needs getting lost in the translation between the initial request and final output.
    • Inadequate solutions or cost overruns and dissatisfaction with IT.
    • IT losing its credibility as stakeholders do not see the value and work around the process.
    • Late projects that tie up IT resources longer than planned, and cost overruns that come out of the IT budget.
    • Inconsistent project execution, leading to inconsistent outcomes.

    Strong stakeholder satisfaction with requirements results in higher satisfaction in other areas

    High stakeholder satisfaction with requirements results in higher satisfaction in other areas.

    Note: “High satisfaction” was classified as a score greater or equal to eight, and “low satisfaction” was every organization that scored below eight on the same questions.

    2.1.1 Gather and review requirements

    1-2 hours

    1. Once existing documentation has been gathered, evaluate the effectiveness of the documentation and decide whether you need additional information to proceed to current-state mapping.
    2. The initiative team should avoid spending too much time on the discovery phase, as the goal of discovery is to obtain enough information to produce a level-one current-state map.
    3. Consider reviewing capabilities, business processes, current applications, integration, and data migration.

    Download Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook

    Input

    Output

    • Your requirements, capabilities, business processes, current applications, integration, and/or data migration
    • Your requirements, capabilities, business processes, current applications, integration, and/or data migration revisited

    Materials

    Participants

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook
    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    2.1.1 Requirements list

    Example

    Requirements with description, category and priority.

    2.1.2 Confirm your scope for implementation

    1-2 hours

    1. Based on the requirements, write down features of the product or services, as well as dependencies with other interfaces.
    2. Write down exclusions to guard against scope creep.
    3. Validate the scope by asking these questions:
      1. Will this scope provide a common understanding for all stakeholders, including those outside of IT, as to what the project will accomplish and what it excludes?
      2. Should any detail be added to prevent scope creep later?
    4. Record the project scope in section 2.1 of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Download Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook

    Input

    Output

    • What’s in scope
    • What’s out of scope
    • What needs to integrate
    • Your scope areas

    Materials

    Participants

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook
    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    2.1.2 Scope detail

    Example

    Example of scope detail. Table with scope levels: In scope, out of scope and existing scope. Each scope level has details about it listed.

    Distill your requirements into a scope statement

    Requirements are about the what and the how.
    Scope specifies the features of the product or service – what is in and what is out
    Table showing Requirement document vs. Scope statement. It lists the audience, content, inputs and outputs for each.

    The Build Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook 2.2 Project Scope Statement includes:

    • Scope description (features, how it interfaces with other solution components, dependencies).
    • Exclusions (what is not part of scope).
    • Deliverables (product outputs, documentation).
    • Acceptance criteria (what metrics must be satisfied for the deliverable to be accepted).
    • Final sign-off (owner).
    • Project exclusions (scope item, details).

    The scope statement should communicate the breadth of the project

    To assist in forming your scope statement, answer the following questions:
    • What are the major coverage points?
    • Who will be using the systems?
    • How will different users interact with the systems?
    • What are the objectives that need to be addressed?
    • Where do we start?
    • Where do we draw the line?

    2.1.3 Formulate a scope statement

    1-2 hours

    1. Lay out the scope description (features, how it interfaces with other solution components, dependencies).
    2. Record the exclusions (what is not part of scope).
    3. Fill out the scope statement.
    4. Record the scope statement in section 2.2 of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Download Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Input

    Output

    • Your scope areas
    • Your scope statement

    Materials

    Participants

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.
    • Scope statement template
    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    2.1.3 Scope statement

    Example

    Examples of scope statements showing the following: Product or service in scope, project deliverables and acceptance criteria, and project exclusions.

    Step 2.2

    Review project scope

    Activities

    2.2.1 Define metrics for your project

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    Outcomes of this step

    The project metrics

    Building leading indicators

    Lagging KPIs are relatively simple to identify, whereas leading KPIs can be more elusive.

    For example, take the lagging KPI “Customer Satisfaction.” How do you turn that into a leading KPI? One method is to look at sources of customer complaints. In a retail sales system, backordered items will negatively impact customer satisfaction. As a leading indicator, track the number of orders with backordered lines and the percentage of the total order that was backordered.

    Performance Metrics

    Use leading and lagging metrics, as well as benchmarks, to track the progress of your system.

    Leading KPIs: Input-oriented measures:

    • Number of active users in the system.
    • Time-to-completion for processes that previously experienced efficiency pain points.

    Lagging KPIs: Output-oriented measures:

    • Faster production times.
    • Increased customer satisfaction scores

    Benchmarks: A standard to measure performance against:

    • Number of days to ramp up new users.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Leading indicators make the news; lagging indicators report on the news. Focusing on leading indicators allows you to address challenges before they become large problems with only expensive solutions.

    2.2.1 Define metrics for your project

    1-2 hours

    1. Examine outputs from any feedback mechanisms you have (satisfaction surveys, emails, existing SLAs, burndown charts, resourcing costs, licensing costs per sprint, etc.).
    2. Look at historical trends and figures when available. However, be careful of frequent anomalies, as these may indicate a root cause that needs to be addressed.
    3. Explore the definition of specific metrics across different functional teams to ensure consistency of measurement and reporting.
    4. Record the Project Metrics in section 2.3 of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Download Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Input

    Output

    • Outputs of any feedback mechanism
    • Historical trends
    • Your project tracking metrics

    Materials

    Participants

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.
    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    2.2.1 Metrics

    In addition to delivery metrics and system performance metrics, equip the business with process-based metrics to continuously prove the value of the enterprise software. Review the examples below as a starting point.

    Table showing metrics and desciption. Metrics listed are: Percent of requirements complete, issues found, issues resolved, and percent of processess complete.

    Step 2.3

    Prepare for project risks

    Activities

    2.3.1 Build a risk event menu

    2.3.2 Determine contextual risks

    2.3.3 Determine process risks

    2.3.4 Determine business risks

    2.3.5 Determine change risks

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    Outcomes of this step

    Steps to create your product canvas and product vision statement

    All risks are not created equal

    Project Risk consists of: Contextual risk, process risk, change risk and business risk.

    For more information on Info-Tech’s Four-Pillar Risk Framework, please see Right-Size Your Project Risk Investment.

    Info-Tech’s Four-Pillar Risk Framework

    Unusual risks should be detected by finding out how each project is different from the norm. Use this framework to start this process by confronting the risks that are more easily anticipated.

    2.3.1 Build a risk event menu

    0.5-1 hour

    1. Build and maintain an active menu of potential risk events across the four risk categories.
    2. Record the risk event menu in section 2.4 of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Download Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Input

    Output

    • Risk events
    • Your risk events menu

    Materials

    Participants

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.
    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    2.3.1 Risk event menu

    Example

    Risk event menu example. A table with: Contextual Risk, process risk, business risk, change risk events with examples for each.

    2.3.2 Determine contextual risks

    0.5-1 hour

    1. Contextual risk factors are those that operate within the context of your department, organization, and/or community.
    2. Fill out contextual risks.
    3. Record the contextual risks in section 2.5 of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Download

    Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Input

    Output

    • Your risk events menu
    • Your list of people involved in risk management
    • Your contextual risks

    Materials

    Participants

    • Project Risk Management Workbook
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.
    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    2.3.2 Contextual risks

    Example

    two tables for Contextual risks. Table 1: Risk identification with event name, risk cause, impact and risk owner. Table 2: shows probability of risk, impact, rating, recommended action, and any mitigations.

    2.3.3 Determine process risks

    0.5-1 hour

    1. Process risks are those that involve project sponsorship, project management, business and functional requirements, work assignment, communication, and/or visibility.
    2. Fill out process risks.
    3. Record the process risks in section 2.6 of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Download

    Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Input

    Output

    • Your risk events menu
    • Your list of people involved in risk management
    • Your process risks

    Materials

    Participants

    • Project Risk Management Workbook
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.
    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    2.3.3 Process risks

    Example

    two tables for Process risks. Table 1: Risk identification with event name, risk cause, impact and risk owner. Table 2: shows probability of risk, impact, rating, recommended action, and any mitigations.

    2.3.4 Determine business risks

    0.5-1 hour

    1. Business risks are those that affect the bottom line of the organization. They usually have implications on revenue, costs, and/or image.
    2. Fill out business risks.
    3. Record the business risks in section 2.7 of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Download

    Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Input

    Output

    • Your risk events menu
    • Your list of people involved in risk management
    • Your business risks

    Materials

    Participants

    • Project Risk Management Workbook
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.
    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    2.3.4 Business risks

    Example

    two tables for Business risks. Table 1: Risk identification with event name, risk cause, impact and risk owner. Table 2: shows probability of risk, impact, rating, recommended action, and any mitigations.

    2.3.5 Determine change risks

    0.5-1 hour

    1. Change risks are those that result from imposing changes on the people and customers of the organization and their daily routines.
    2. Fill change risks.
    3. Record the change risks in section 2.7 of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Download Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Input

    Output

    • Your risk events menu
    • Your list of people involved in risk management
    • Your business risks

    Materials

    Participants

    • Project Risk Management Workbook
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.
    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    2.3.5 Change risks

    Example

    two tables for Change risks. Table 1: Risk identification with event name, risk cause, impact and risk owner. Table 2: shows probability of risk, impact, rating, recommended action, and any mitigations.

    Step 2.4

    Identify the project team

    Activities

    2.4.1 Establish team composition

    2.4.2 Identify the team

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    Outcomes of this step

    Steps to get your project team ready

    Understand the unique external resource considerations for the implementation

    Organizations rarely have sufficient internal staffing to resource an enterprise software implementation project entirely on their own. Consider the options for closing the gap in internal resource availability.

    The most common project resourcing structures for enterprise projects are:

    1. Management consultant
    2. Vendor consultant
    3. System integrator

    When contemplating a resourcing structure, consider:

    • Availability of in-house implementation competencies and resources.
    • Timeline and cost constraints.
    • Integration environment complexity.

    CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING

    Internal Vs. External Roles and Responsibilities

    Clearly delineate between internal and external team responsibilities and accountabilities and communicate this to your technology partner upfront.

    Internal Vs. External Accountabilities

    Accountability is different than responsibility. Your vendor or SI partner may be responsible for completing certain tasks, but be careful not to outsource accountability for the implementation – ultimately, the internal team will be accountable.

    Partner Implementation Methodologies

    Often vendors and/or SIs will have their own preferred implementation methodology. Consider the use of your partner’s implementation methodology; however, you know what will work for your organization.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Selecting a partner is not just about capabilities, it’s about compatibility! Ensure you select a partner that has a culture compatible with your own.

    2.4.1 Establish team composition

    0.5-1 hour

    1. Assess the skills necessary for an enterprise implementation.
    2. Select your internal implementation team.
    3. Identify the number of external consultants/support required for implementation.
    4. Document the roles and responsibilities, accountabilities, and other expectations as they relate to each step of the implementation.
    5. Record the team composition in section 2.9 of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Download

    Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Input

    Output

    • List of project team skills
    • Your team composition
    • Your business risks

    Materials

    Participants

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.
    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    2.4.1 Team composition

    Example

    Team composition: Role of each team member, and their skills.

    2.4.2 Identify the team

    0.5-1 hour

    1. Identify a candidate for each role and determine their responsibility in the project and their expected time commitment.
    2. The project will require a cross-functional team within IT and business units. Make sure the responsibilities are clearly communicated to the selected project sponsor.
    3. Create a RACI matrix for the project.
    4. Record the team list in section 2.10 of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Download

    Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Input

    Output

    • Your team composition
    • Your team with responsibilities and commitment

    Materials

    Participants

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.
    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    2.4.2 Team list

    Example

    Team list: Role of each team member, candidate, responsibilities, and their commitment in hours per week.

    RACI example

    RACI example. Responsibilities and team member roles that are tasked with each responsibility.

    Step 2.5

    Define your change management process

    Activities

    2.5.1 Define OCM structure and resources

    2.5.2 Define OCM team’s roles and responsibilities

    2.5.3 Define requirements for training

    2.5.4 Create a communications plan for stakeholder groups, and delivery teams

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    Outcomes of this step

    A structure and procedures for an effective organizational change management

    Define your change management process to improve quality and adoption

    Organizational change management is the practice through which the PMO can improve user adoption rates and maximize project benefits.

    Correlation of change management effectiveness with meeting results.

    “It’s one thing to provide a new technology tool to your end users.

    It’s quite another to get them to use the tool, and still different for them to use the new tool proficiently.

    When your end users fully use a new technology and make it part of their daily work habits, they have ‘adopted’ the new tool.”

    – “End-User Adoption and Change Management Process” (2022)

    Large projects require organizational change management

    Organizational change management (OCM) governs the introduction of new business processes and technologies to ensure stakeholder adoption. The purpose of OCM is to prepare the business to accept the change.

    OCM is a separate body of knowledge. However, as a practice, it is inseparable from project management.

    In IT, project planning tends to fixate on technology, and it underestimates the behavioral and cultural factors that inhibit user adoption. Whether change is project-specific or continuous, it’s more important to instill the desire to change than to apply specific tools and techniques.

    Accountability for instilling this desire should start with the project sponsor. The project manager should support this with effective stakeholder and communication management plans.

    16% of projects with poor change management met or exceeded objectives. 71% of projects with excellent change management finish on or ahead of schedule. 67% of organizations include project change management in their initiatives.

    For further discussion on organizational change, use Info-Tech’s blueprint, Master Organizational Change Management Practices

    Your application implementation will be best served by centralizing OCM

    A centralized approach to OCM is most effective, and the PMO is already a centralized project office and is already accountable for project outcomes.

    What’s more, in organizations where accountabilities for OCM are not explicitly defined, the PMO will likely already be assumed to be the default change leader by the wider organization.

    It makes sense for the PMO to accept this accountability – in the short term at least – and claim the benefits that will come from coordinating and consistently driving successful project outcomes.

    In the long term, OCM leadership will help the PMO become a strategic partner with the executive layer and the business side.

    Short-term gains made by the PMO can be used to spark dialogues with those who authorize project spending and have the implicit fiduciary obligation to drive project benefits.

    Ultimately, it’s their job to explicitly transfer that obligation along with the commensurate resourcing and authority for OCM activities.

    Organizational resistance to change is cited as the #1 challenge to project success that PMOs face. Companies with mature PMOs that effectively manage change meet expectations 90% of the time.

    For further discussion on organizational change, use Info-Tech’s blueprint, Master Organizational Change Management Practices

    2.5.1 Define OCM structure and resources

    0.5-1 hour

    1. Assess the roles and resources that might be needed to help support these OCM efforts.
    2. Record the OCM structure in section 2.11 of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Download

    Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Input

    Output

    • Your project objectives
    • Your OCM structure and resources

    Materials

    Participants

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.
    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    2.5.1 OCM structure and resources

    Example

    OCM structure example. Table showing OCM activity and resources available to support.

    2.5.2 Define OCM team’s roles and responsibilities

    0.5-1 hour

    1. Assess the tasks required for the team.
    2. Determine roles and responsibilities.
    3. Record the results in the RACI matrix in section 2.13 of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Download

    Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Input

    Output

    • Your communications timeline
    • Your OCM structure and resources
    • Your OCM plan and RACI matrix

    Materials

    Participants

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.
    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    OCM team’s roles and responsibilities

    Example

    Responsibilities for OCM team members.

    2.5.3 Define requirements for training

    0.5-1 hour

    1. Analyze HR requirements to ensure efficient use of HR and project stakeholder time.
    2. Outline appropriate HR and training activities.
    3. Define training content and make key logistical decisions concerning training delivery for staff and users.
    4. Record training requirements in section 2.14 of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Download

    Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Input

    Output

    • Your OCM Plan and RACI matrix
    • Your HR training needs

    Materials

    Participants

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.
    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    2.5.3 Training requirements

    Example

    Training requirements example: Project milestones, milestone time frame, hr/training activities, activity timing, and notes.

    Project communication plans must address creation, flow, deposition, and security of project information

    A good communication management plan is like the oil that keeps moving parts going. Ensuring smooth information flow is a fundamental aspect of project management.

    Project communication management is more than keeping track of stakeholder requirements. A communication management plan must address timely and appropriate creation, flow, and deposition of information about the project – as well as the security of the information.

    Create:

    • In addition to standardized status reporting elements discussed for level 1 projects, level 2 and 3 projects may require additional information to be disseminated among key stakeholders and the PMO.

    Flow:

    • The plan must address the methods of communication. Distributed project teams require more careful planning, as they pose additional communication challenges.

    Deposit:

    • As the volume of information continues to grow exponentially, retrieving information becomes a challenge. The plan for depositing project information must be consistent with your organization’s content management policies.

    Security:

    • Preventing unauthorized access and information leaks is important for projectsthat are intended to provide the organization with a competitive edge or for projects that deal with confidential data.
    45% of organizations had established mature communications and engagement processes.

    2.5.4 Create a communications timeline

    0.5-1 hour

    1. Base your change communications on your organization’s cultural appetite for change in general.
    2. Document communications plan requirements.
    3. Create a high-level communications timeline.
    4. Tailor a communications strategy for each stakeholder group.
    5. Record the communications timeline in section 2.12 of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Download

    Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Input

    Output

    • Your OCM structure and resources
    • Your project objectives
    • Your project scope
    • Your stakeholders’ management plan
    • Your communications timeline

    Materials

    Participants

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.
    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    Example of communications timeline

    Project sponsors are the most compelling storytellers to communicate the change

    Example of project communications timeline. Planning, requirements, design, development, QA, deployment, warranty, and benefits/closure.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Communication with stakeholders and sponsors is not a single event, but a continual process throughout the lifecycle of the project implementation – and beyond!

    Phase 3

    Document your plan

    3 phases, phase 3 is highlighted.

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    3.1 Develop a master project plan

    3.2. Define a follow-up plan

    3.3. Define the follow-up process

    3.4. Understand what’s next

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    Step 3.1

    Develop a master project plan

    Activities

    3.1.1 Define your implementation steps

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    Outcomes of this step

    Steps to create your resourcing and master plans

    Resources Vs. Demand

    Organizations rarely have sufficient internal staffing to resource an enterprise software implementation project entirely on their own. Consider the options for closing the gap in internal resource availability.

    Project demand: Data classification, cloud strategy, application rationalization, recovery planning etc. must be weighted against the organizations internal staffing resources.

    Competing priorities

    Example

    Table for competing priorities: List of projects, their timeline, priority notes, and their implications.

    3.1.1 Define your implementation steps

    0.5-1 hour

    1. Write each phase of the project on a separate sticky note and add it to the whiteboard. Determine what steps make up each phase. Write each step of the phase on a separate sticky note and add it to the whiteboard.
    2. Determine what tasks make up each step. Write each task of the step on a separate sticky note and add it to the whiteboard.
    3. Record the tasks in the Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook – Timeline tool. This tool has an example of a typical list of tasks, to help you start your master plan. Use the timeline for project planning and progress tracking.
    4. Record your project’s basic data and work schedule.

    Download

    Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Input

    Output

    • Project's work breakdown structure
    • Your project master plan

    Materials

    Participants

    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    Implementation plan – basic data

    Record your project name, project manager, and stakeholders from previous exercises.

    Example project information form: Project name, estimated start date, estimated end date, project manager, stakeholders, and time off of project.

    Implementation plan – work schedule

    Use this template to keep track of all project tasks, dates, owners, dependencies, etc.

    Use this template to keep track of all project tasks, dates, owners, dependencies, etc.

    “Actual Start Date” and “Actual Completion Date” columns must be updated to be reflected in the Gantt chart.

    This information will also be captured as the source for session 3.2.1 dashboards.

    Step 3.2

    Define a follow up plan

    Activities

    3.2.1 Create templates to enable follow-up throughout the project

    3.2.2 Decide on the tracking tools to help during your implementation

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    Outcomes of this step

    Steps to create the processes and define the tools to track progress

    Leveraging dashboards

    Build a dashboard that reflects the leading metrics you have identified. Call out requirements that represent key milestones in the implementation.

    For further information on monitoring the project, use Info-Tech’s blueprint, Governance and Management of Enterprise Software Implementation

    Build a dashboard that reflects the leading metrics you have identified. Call out requirements that represent key milestones in the implementation.

    3.2.1 Create templates to enable follow-up throughout the project

    0.5-1 hour

    1. Create status report, dashboards/charts, budget control, risk/issues/gaps templates, and change request forms.
    2. Build a dashboard that reflects the leading metrics you have identified.
    3. Call out requirements that represent key milestones in the implementation.

    Download

    Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Input

    Output

    • Your projects master plan
    • Your project follow-up kit

    Materials

    Participants

    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    Dashboards

    Based on the inputs in session 3.1.1 Define Your Implementation Steps, once the “Actual Start Date” and “Actual Completion Date” columns have been updated, this dashboard will present the project status and progress

    Based on the inputs in session 3.1.1 Define Your Implementation Steps, once the “Actual Start Date” and “Actual Completion Date” columns have been updated, this dashboard will present the project status and progress.

    This executive overview of the project's progress is meant to be used during the status meeting.

    Select the right tools

    Use SoftwareReviews to explore product features, vendor experience, and capability satisfaction.

    SoftwareReviews, Requirements Management, 2023

    SoftwareReviews, Project Management, 2023

    SoftwareReviews, Business Intelligence & Analytics, 2023

    3.2.2 Decide on the tracking tools to help during your implementation

    0.5-1 hour

    1. Based on the standards within your organization, select the appropriate project tracking tools to help you track the implementation project.
    2. If you do not have any tools or wish to change them, please see leverage Info-Tech’s SoftwareReviews to help you in making your decision.
    3. Consider tooling across a number of different categories:
      1. Requirements Management
      2. Project Management
      3. Reporting and Analytics
    4. Record the project tracking tools in section 3.3 of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Download

    Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Input

    Output

    • Your project follow-up kit
    • Your project follow-up kit tools

    Materials

    Participants

    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    Example: project tools

    Table listing project tools by type, use, and products available.

    Step 3.3

    Define a follow-up process

    Activities

    3.3.1 Define project progress communication

    3.3.2 Create a change request process

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    Outcomes of this step

    Steps to create your follow-up process

    Project status updates should occur throughout the implementation

    Project status updates can be both formal and informal. Formal status updates provide a standardized means of disseminating information on project progress. It is the lifeblood of project management: Accurate and up-to-date status reporting enables your project manager to ensure that your project can continue to use the resources needed.

    Informal status updates are done over coffee with key stakeholders to address their concerns and discuss key outcomes they want to see. Informal status updates help to build a more personal relationship.

    Ask for feedback during the status update meetings. Use the meeting as an opportunity to align values, goals, and incentives.

    Codify the following considerations:

    • Minimum requirement for a formal status update:
      • Frequency of reporting, as required by the project portfolio
      • Parties to be consulted and informed
      • Recording, producing, and archiving meeting minutes, both formal and informal
    • Procedure for follow-up on feedback generated from status updates:
      • Filing change requests
      • Keeping the change requester/relevant stakeholders in the loop

    3.3.1 Define project progress communication

    0.5-1 hour

    1. Provide a standardized means of disseminating information on project progress.
    2. Create an accurate and up-to-date status report to help keep team engaged and leadership supporting the project.
    3. Record the project progress communication in section 3.5 of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Download

    Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Input

    Output

    • Your project follow-up process
    • Your project progress communication

    Materials

    Participants

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.
    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    Project progress communication

    Example

    Example table of project progress communication. Audience, purpose, delivery/format, communicator, delivery date, and status/notes.

    Manage project scope changes

    1. Change in project scope is unpredictable and almost inevitable regardless of project size. If changes are not properly managed, the project runs the risk of scope creep and loss of progress. Therefore, changes need to be monitored and controlled.
    2. Scope change can be initiated voluntarily by the project sponsor or other stakeholders, or it could be a mandatory reaction to changing project process.
    3. Scope change may also take place due to internal factors such as a stakeholder requiring more extensive insights or external factors such as changing market conditions.
    4. Scope changes have the potential to affect project outcomes either positively or negatively, depending on how the change is managed and implemented. The project manager should take care to maintain focus on the project’s ultimate objectives; consideration needs to be given as to what to do and what to give up.
    5. If changes arise, project managers should ensure that adequate resources and actions are provided so the project can be completed on time and on budget.
    • The project manager needs to use both hard and soft skills: analytical skills for evaluating and quantifying the impact of potential changes and communication skills for communicating and negotiating with stakeholders.
    • Build trust and credibility by taking an evidence-based approach when presenting changes. This gives you room to respectfully push back on certain changes.
    • Assess changes before crossing them off the list, but don’t be afraid to say no. Greater care must be taken when there is very limited budgetary freedom or when scope changes will interfere with the critical path.
    • All change requests must be received by the project manager first so they can make sure that IT project resources are not approached with multiple ad hoc change requests.

    Document your process to manage project change requests

    1 Initial assessment

    Using the scope statement as the reference point:

    • Why do we need the change?
    • Is the change necessary?
    • What is the business value that the change brings to the project?

    Recommend alternative solutions that are easier to implement while consulting the requester.

    2 Minor change

    If the change has been classified as minor, the project manager and the project team can tackle it directly, since it doesn’t affect project budget or schedule in a significant way. Ensure that the change is documented.

    3 conduct an in-depth assessment

    The project manager should bring major changes to the attention of the project sponsor and carry out a detailed assessment of the change and its impact.

    Additional time and resources are required to do the in-depth assessment because the impact on the project can be complex and affect requirements, resources, budget, and schedule.

    4 Obtain approval from the governing body

    Present the results to the governing body. Since a major change significantly affects the project baseline beyond the authorized contingency, it is the responsibility of the governing body to either approve the change with allocation of additional resources or reject the change and maintain course.

    Flow chart to document your process to manage project change requests.

    For further discussion on change requests, use Info-Tech’s blueprint, Begin Your Projects With the End in Mind

    3.3.2 Create a change request process

    0.5-1 hour

    1. Identify any existing processes that you have for addressing changes for projects.
    2. Discuss whether or not the current change request process will suit the project at hand.
    3. Define the agreed-to change request process that fits your organization’s culture.
    4. For a change request template, you can leverage, refer to section 3.6 of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.
    5. Make any changes to the template as necessary.

    Download

    Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Input

    Output

    • Your project scope
    • Your change request

    Materials

    Participants

    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    3.3.2 Create a change request process (Continued)

    Example of a change request process form.

    Step 3.4

    Understand what's next

    Activities

    3.4.1 Run a “lessons learned” session for continuous improvement

    3.4.2 Prepare a closure document for sign-off

    3.4.3 Document optimization and future release opportunities

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    Outcomes of this step

    Lessons learned throughout the project-guiding

    Good project planning is key to smooth project closing

    Begin with the end in mind. Without a clear scope statement and criteria for acceptance, it’s anyone’s guess when or how a project will end.

    During the closing process, the project manager should use planning and execution documents, such as the project charter and the scope statement, to assess project completeness and obtain sign-off based on the acceptance criteria.

    Project completion criteria should be clearly defined. For example, the project is defined as finished when costs are in, vendor receipts are received, financials are reviewed and approved, etc.

    However, there are other steps to be taken after completing the project deliverables. These activities include:

    • Transferring project knowledge and operations to support
    • Completing user training
    • Obtaining business sign-off and acceptance
    • Releasing resources
    • Conducting post-mortem meeting
    • Archiving project assets

    The project manager needs to complete all project management processes, including:

    • Risk management (close out risk assessment and action plan)
    • Quality management (test the final deliverables against acceptance criteria)
    • Stakeholder management (decision log, close out issues, plan and assign owners for resolutions of open issues)
    • Project team management (performance evaluation for team members as well as the project manager)

    3.4.1 Define the process for lessons learned

    0.5-1 hour

    1. Determine the reporting frequency for lessons learned.
    2. Consider attributing lessons learned to project phases.
    3. Coordinate lessons learned check-ins with project milestones to review and reflect.
    4. At each reporting session, the project team should identify challenges and successes informally.
    5. The PM and the PMO should transform the reports from each team member into formalized lessons.
    6. Record lessons learned for each project in section 3.7 of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Download

    Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Input

    Output

    • Your project's lessons learned

    Materials

    Participants

    • Project Lessons Learned Template
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.
    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    Lessons learned

    Example

    Form: Project successes, notes, areas of imporvement, impact, solution.

    Watch for these potential problems with project closure

    Don’t leave the door open for stakeholder dissatisfaction. Properly close out your projects.

    Potential problems with project closure.

    For further information on project closure issues, use Info-Tech’s blueprint, Get Started With Project Management Excellence.

    3.4.2 Prepare a closure document for sign-off

    0.5-1 hour

    1. Create a realistic closure and transition process that gains sign-off from the sponsor.
    2. Prepare a project closure checklist.
    3. Transfer accountability to operations, release project resources, and avoid disrupting other projects that are trying to get started.
    4. Record the project closure document in section 3.8 of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Download

    Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Input

    Output

    • Your project objectives
    • Your project scope
    • Your project's closure checklist

    Materials

    Participants

    • Project closure checklist Template
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.
    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    Closure checklist

    Project closure checklist. project management checklist, deliverables, goals, benefits, outstanding action items and issues, handover of technical documents, knowledge transfer, sign-off.

    For further information on closure procedures, use Info-Tech’s blueprint, Begin Your Projects With the End in Mind.

    3.4.3 Document optimization and future release opportunities

    0.5-1 hour

    Consider the future opportunities for improvement post-release:

    1. Product and vendor satisfaction opportunities
    2. Capability and feature optimization opportunities
    3. Process optimization opportunities
    4. Integration optimization opportunities
    5. Data optimization opportunities
    6. Cost-saving opportunities
    7. Record optimization and future release opportunities in section 3.9 of Info-Tech’s Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Download

    Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.

    Input

    Output

    • Your project objectives
    • Your project scope
    • Your optimization opportunities list

    Materials

    Participants

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Your Enterprise Application Implementation Playbook.
    • Project team
    • Operations
    • SMEs
    • Team lead and facilitators
    • IT leaders

    Optimization opportunities

    Example

    Optimization types and opportunities.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Build upon your foundations

    Build an ERP Strategy and Roadmap

    • A business-led, top-management-supported initiative partnered with IT has the greatest chance of success. This blueprint provides business and IT the methodology for getting the right level of detail for the business processes that the ERP supports thus avoiding getting lost in the details.

    Governance and Management of Enterprise Software Implementation

    • Implementing enterprise software is hard. You need a framework that will greatly improve your chance of success. Traditional Waterfall project implementations have a demonstrated a low success rate for on-time, on-budget delivery.

    Select and Implement a Human Resource Information System

    • Your organization is in the midst of a selection and implementation process for a human resource information system (HRIS), and there is a need to disambiguate the market and arrive at a shortlist of vendors.

    Select and Implement an ERP Solution

    • Selecting and implementing an ERP is one of the most expensive and time-consuming technology transformations an organization can undertake. ERP projects are notorious for time and budget overruns, with only a margin of the anticipated benefits being realized.

    Right-Size Your Project Risk Investment

    • Avoid the all-or-nothing mindset; even modest investments in risk will provide a return. Learn from and record current and historical risk events so lessons learned can easily be embedded into future projects. Assign someone to own the risk topic and make it their job to keep a relevant menu of risks.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Build upon your foundations

    Drive Business Value With a Right-Sized Project Gating Process

    • Many organizations have implemented gating as part of their project management process. So, what separates those who are successful from those who are not? For starters, successful gating requires that each gate is treated as an essential audit. That means there need to be clear roles and responsibilities in the framework.

    Master Organizational Change Management Practices

    • Organizational change management (OCM) is often an Achilles’ heel for IT departments and business units, putting projects and programs at risk – especially large, complex, transformational projects.

    Get Started With Project Management Excellence

    • Lack of proper scoping at the beginning of the project leads to constant rescoping, rescheduling, and budget overruns.

    ERP Requirements Picklist Tool

    • Use this tool to collect ERP requirements in alignment with the major functional areas of ERP. Review the existing set of ERP requirements as a starting point to compiling your organization's requirements.

    Begin Your Projects With the End in Mind

    • Stakeholders are dissatisfied with IT’s inability to meet or even provide consistent, accurate estimates. The business’ trust in IT erodes every time a project is late, lost, or unable to start.

    Get Started With IT Project Portfolio Management

    • Most companies are struggling to get their project work done. This is due in part to the fact that many prescribed remedies are confusing, disruptive, costly, or ineffective.

    Bibliography

    7 Shocking Project Management Statistics and Lessons We Should Learn.” TeamGantt, Jan. 2017.

    Akrong, Godwin Banafo, et al. "Overcoming the Challenges of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP): A Systematic Review Approach." IJEIS vol.18, no.1 2022: pp.1-41.

    Andriole, S. “Why No One Can Manage Projects, Especially Technology Projects.” Forbes, 1 Dec. 2020.

    Andriole, Steve. “Why No One Can Manage Projects, Especially Technology Projects.” Forbes, 1 Dec. 2020.

    Beeson, K. “ERP Implementation Plan (ERP Implementation Process Guide).” ERP Focus, 8 Aug. 2022.

    Biel, Justin. “60 Critical ERP Statistics: 2022 Market Trends, Data and Analysis.” Oracle Netsuite, 12 July 2022.

    Bloch, Michael, et al. “Delivering Large-Scale IT Projects on Time, on Budget, and on Value.” McKinsey & Company, 2012.

    Buverud, Heidi. ERP System Implementation: How Top Managers' Involvement in a Change Project Matters. 2019. Norwegian School of Economics, Ph.D. thesis.

    Carlton, R. “Four ERP Implementation Case Studies You Can Learn From.” ERP Focus, 15 July 2015.

    Gopinath, S. Project Management in the Emerging World of Disruption. PMI India Research and Academic Conference 2019. Kozhikode Publishers.

    Grabis, J. “On-Premise or Cloud Enterprise Application Deployment: Fit-Gap Perspective.” Enterprise Information Systems. Edited by Filipe, J., Śmiałek, M., Brodsky, A., Hammoudi, S. ICEIS, 2019.

    Harrin, E. The Definitive Guide to Project Sponsors. RGPM, 13 Dec. 2022.

    Jacobs-Long, Ann. “EPMO’s Can Make A Difference In Your Organization.” 9 May 2012.

    Kotadia, C. “Challenges Involved in Adapting and Implementing an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems.” International Journal of Research and Review vol. 7 no. 12 December 2020: 538-548.

    Panorama Consulting Group. "2018 ERP Report." Panorama Consulting Group, 2018. Accessed 12 Oct. 2021.

    Panorama Consulting Group. "2021 ERP Report." Panorama Consulting Group, 2021. Accessed 12 Oct. 2021.

    PM Solutions. (2014). The State of the PMO 2014.

    PMI. Pulse of the Profession. 2017.

    Podeswa, H. “The Business Case for Agile Business Analysis.” Requirements Engineering Magazine, 21 Feb. 2017.

    Project Delivery Performance in Australia. AIPM and KPMG, 2020.

    Prosci. (2020). Prosci 2020 Benchmarking Data from 2007, 2009, 2011, 2013, 2015, 2017, 2019.

    Swartz, M. “End User Adoption and Change Management Process.” Swartz Consulting LLC, 11 July 2022.

    Trammell, H. “28 Important Project Management KPIs (& How To Track Them).” ClearPoint Strategy, 2022.

    “What are Business Requirements?" Requirements.com, 18 Oct. 2018.

    “What Is the Role of a Project Sponsor?” Six Sigma Daily, 18 May 2022.

    “When Will You Think Differently About Programme Delivery?” 4th Global Portfolio and Programme Management Survey. PricewaterhouseCoopers, Sept. 2014.

    Implement Crisis Management Best Practices

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}415|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.7/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $50,532 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 42 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: DR and Business Continuity
    • Parent Category Link: /business-continuity
    • There’s a belief that you can’t know what crisis will hit you next, so you can’t prepare for it. As a result, resilience planning stops at more-specific planning such as business continuity planning or IT disaster recovery planning.
    • Business contingency and IT disaster recovery plans focus on how to resume normal operations following an incident. The missing piece is the crisis management plan – the overarching plan that guides the organization’s initial response, assessment, and action.
    • Organizations without a crisis management plan are far less able to minimize the impact of other crises such as a security breach, health & safety incident, or attacks on their reputation.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Effective crisis management has a long-term demonstrable impact on your organization, long after the crisis is resolved. While all organizations can expect a short-term negative impact when a crisis hits, if the crisis is managed well, the research shows that your market capitalization can actually increase long term.
    • Crisis communication is more science than art and should follow a structured approach. Crisis communication is about more than being a good writer or having a social media presence. There are specific messages that must be included, and specific audiences to target, to get the results you need.
    • IT has a critical role in non-IT crises (as well as IT crises). Many crises are IT events (e.g. security breach). For non-IT events, IT is critical in supporting crisis communication and the operational response (e.g. COVID-19 and quickly ramping up working-from-home).

    Impact and Result

    • You can anticipate the types of crisis your organization may face in the future and build flexible plans that can be adapted in a crisis to meet the needs of the moment.
    • Identify potential crises that present a high risk to your organization.
    • Document emergency response and crisis response plans that provide a framework for addressing a range of crises.
    • Establish crisis communication guidelines to avoid embarrassing and damaging communications missteps.

    Implement Crisis Management Best Practices Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should implement crisis management best practices, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Identify potential crises and your crisis management team

    Identify, analyze, and prioritized potential crises based on risk to the organization. Set crisis management team roles and responsibilities. Adopt a crisis management framework.

    • Example Crisis Management Process Flowcharts (Visio)
    • Example Crisis Management Process Flowcharts (PDF)
    • Business Continuity Teams and Roles Tool

    2. Document your emergency and crisis response plans

    Document workflows for notification, situational assessment, emergency response, and crisis response.

    • Emergency Response Plan Checklist
    • Emergency Response Plan Summary
    • Emergency Response Plan Staff Instructions
    • Pandemic Response Plan Example
    • Pandemic Policy

    3. Document crisis communication guidelines

    Develop and document guidelines that support the creation and distribution of crisis communications.

    • Crisis Communication Guidelines and Templates

    4. Complete and maintain your crisis management plan

    Summarize your crisis management and response plans, create a roadmap to implement potential improvement projects, develop training and awareness initiatives, and schedule maintenance to keep the plan evergreen.

    • Crisis Management Plan Summary Example
    • BCP Project Roadmap Tool
    • Organizational Learning Guide
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Implement Crisis Management Best Practices

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Identify Potential Crises and Your Crisis Management Team

    The Purpose

    Identify and prioritize relevant potential crises.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Enable crisis management pre-planning and identify gaps in current crisis management plans.

    Activities

    1.1 Identify high-risk crises.

    1.2 Assign roles and responsibilities on the crisis management team.

    1.3 Review Info-Tech’s crisis management framework.

    Outputs

    List of high-risk crises.

    CMT membership and responsibilities.

    Adopt the crisis management framework and identify current strengths and gaps.

    2 Document Emergency Response and Crisis Management Plans

    The Purpose

    Outline emergency response and crisis response plans.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Develop and document procedures that enable rapid, effective, and reliable crisis and emergency response.

    Activities

    2.1 Develop crisis notification and assessment procedures.

    2.2 Document your emergency response plans.

    2.3 Document crisis response plans for potential high-risk crises.

    Outputs

    Documented notification and assessment workflows.

    Emergency response plans and checklists.

    Documented crisis response workflows.

    3 Document Crisis Communication Guidelines

    The Purpose

    Define crisis communication guidelines aligned with an actionable crisis communications framework.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Document workflows and guidelines support crisis communications.

    Activities

    3.1 Establish the elements of baseline crisis communications.

    3.2 Identify audiences for the crisis message.

    3.3 Modify baseline communication guidelines based on audience and organizational responsibility.

    3.4 Create a vetting process.

    3.5 Identify communications channels.

    Outputs

    Baseline communications guidelines.

    Situational modifications to crisis communications guidelines.

    Documented vetting process.

    Documented communications channels

    4 Complete and Maintain Your Crisis Management Plan

    The Purpose

    Summarize the crisis management plan, establish an organizational learning process, and identify potential training and awareness activities.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Plan ahead to keep your crisis management practice evergreen.

    Activities

    4.1 Review the CMP Summary Template.

    4.2 Create a project roadmap to close gaps in the crisis management plan.

    4.3 Outline an organizational learning process.

    4.4 Schedule plan reviews, testing, and updates.

    Outputs

    Long-term roadmap to improve crisis management capabilities.

    Crisis management plan maintenance process and awareness program.

    Build a Service Desk Consolidation Strategy

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}479|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve.
    • member rating average days saved: Read what our members are saying
    • Parent Category Name: Service Desk
    • Parent Category Link: /service-desk
    • Incompatible technologies. Organizations with more than one service desk are likely to have many legacy IT service management (ITSM) solutions. These come with a higher support cost, costly skill-set maintenance, and the inability to negotiate volume licensing discounts.
    • Inconsistent processes. Organizations with more than one service desk often have incompatible processes, which can lead to inconsistent service support across departments, less staffing flexibility, and higher support costs.
    • Lack of data integration. Without a single system and consistent processes, IT leaders often have only a partial view of service support activities. This can lead to rigid IT silos, limit the ability to troubleshoot problems, and streamline process workflows.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Every step should put people first. It’s tempting to focus the strategy on designing processes and technologies for the target architecture. However, the most common barrier to success is workforce resistance to change.
    • A consolidated service desk is an investment, not a cost-reduction program. Focus on efficiency, customer service, and end-user satisfaction. There will be many cost savings, but viewing them as an indirect consequence of the pursuit of efficiency and customer service is the best approach.

    Impact and Result

    • Conduct a comprehensive assessment of existing service desk people, processes, and technology.
    • Identify and retire resources and processes that are no longer meeting business needs, and consolidate and modernize resources and processes that are worth keeping.
    • Identify logistic and cost considerations and create a roadmap of consolidation initiatives.
    • Communicate the change and garner support for the consolidation initiative.

    Build a Service Desk Consolidation Strategy Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should build a service desk consolidation strategy, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Develop a shared vision

    Engage stakeholders to develop a vision for the project and perform a comprehensive assessment of existing service desks.

    • Build a Service Desk Consolidation Strategy – Phase 1: Develop a Shared Vision
    • Stakeholder Engagement Workbook
    • Consolidate Service Desk Executive Presentation
    • Consolidate Service Desk Assessment Tool
    • IT Skills Inventory and Gap Assessment Tool

    2. Design the consolidated service desk

    Outline the target state of the consolidated service desk and assess logistics and cost of consolidation.

    • Build a Service Desk Consolidation Strategy – Phase 2: Design the Consolidated Service Desk
    • Consolidate Service Desk Scorecard Tool
    • Consolidated Service Desk SOP Template
    • Service Desk Efficiency Calculator
    • Service Desk Consolidation TCO Comparison Tool

    3. Plan the transition

    Build a project roadmap and communication plan.

    • Build a Service Desk Consolidation Strategy – Phase 3: Plan the Transition
    • Service Desk Consolidation Roadmap
    • Service Desk Consolidation Communications and Training Plan Template
    • Service Desk Consolidation News Bulletin & FAQ Template
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Build a Service Desk Consolidation Strategy

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Engage Stakeholders to Develop a Vision for the Service Desk

    The Purpose

    Identify and engage key stakeholders.

    Conduct an executive visioning session to define the scope and goals of the consolidation.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A list of key stakeholders and an engagement plan to identify needs and garner support for the change.

    A common vision for the consolidation initiative with clearly defined goals and objectives.

    Activities

    1.1 Identify key stakeholders and develop an engagement plan.

    1.2 Brainstorm desired service desk attributes.

    1.3 Conduct an executive visioning session to craft a vision for the consolidated service desk.

    1.4 Define project goals, principles, and KPIs.

    Outputs

    Stakeholder Engagement Workbook

    Executive Presentation

    2 Conduct a Full Assessment of Each Service Desk

    The Purpose

    Assess the overall maturity, structure, organizational design, and performance of each service desk.

    Assess current ITSM tools and how well they are meeting needs.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A robust current state assessment of each service desk.

    An understanding of agent skills, satisfaction, roles, and responsibilities.

    An evaluation of existing ITSM tools and technology.

    Activities

    2.1 Review the results of diagnostics programs.

    2.2 Map organizational structure and roles for each service desk.

    2.3 Assess overall maturity and environment of each service desk.

    2.4 Assess current information system environment.

    Outputs

    Consolidate Service Desk Assessment Tool

    3 Design Target Consolidated Service Desk

    The Purpose

    Define the target state for consolidated service desk.

    Identify requirements for the service desk and a supporting solution.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Detailed requirements and vision for the consolidated service desk.

    Gap analysis of current vs. target state.

    Documented standardized processes and procedures.

    Activities

    3.1 Identify requirements for target consolidated service desk.

    3.2 Build requirements document and shortlist for ITSM tool.

    3.3 Use the scorecard comparison tool to assess the gap between existing service desks and target state.

    3.4 Document standardized processes for new service desk.

    Outputs

    Consolidate Service Desk Scorecard Tool

    Consolidated Service Desk SOP

    4 Plan for the Transition

    The Purpose

    Break down the consolidation project into specific initiatives with a detailed timeline and assigned responsibilities.

    Plan the logistics and cost of the consolidation for process, technology, and facilities.

    Develop a communications plan.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Initial analysis of the logistics and cost considerations to achieve the target.

    A detailed project roadmap to migrate to a consolidated service desk.

    A communications plan with responses to anticipated questions and objections.

    Activities

    4.1 Plan the logistics of the transition.

    4.2 Assess the cost and savings of consolidation to refine business case.

    4.3 Identify initiatives and develop a project roadmap.

    4.4 Plan communications for each stakeholder group.

    Outputs

    Consolidation TCO Tool

    Consolidation Roadmap

    Executive Presentation

    Communications Plan

    News Bulletin & FAQ Template

    Further reading

    Build a Service Desk Consolidation Strategy

    Manage the dark side of growth.

    ANALYST PERSPECTIVE

    A successful service desk consolidation begins and ends with people.

    "It’s tempting to focus strategic planning on the processes and technology that will underpin the consolidated service desk. Consistent processes and a reliable tool will cement the consolidation, but they are not what will hold you back.

    The most common barrier to a successful consolidation is workforce resistance to change. Cultural difference, perceived risks, and organizational inertia can hinder data gathering, deter collaboration, and impede progress from the start.

    Building a consolidated service desk is first and foremost an exercise in organizational change. Garner executive support for the project, enlist a team of volunteers to lead the change, and communicate with key stakeholders early and often. The key is to create a shared vision for the project and engage those who will be most affected."

    Sandi Conrad

    Senior Director, Infrastructure Practice

    Info-Tech Research Group

    Our understanding of the problem

    This Research is Designed For:

    • CIOs who need to reduce support costs and improve customer service.
    • IT leaders tasked with the merger of two or more IT organizations.
    • Service managers implementing a shared service desk tool.
    • Organizations rationalizing IT service management (ITSM) processes.

    This Research Will Help You:

    • Develop a shared vision for the consolidated service desk.
    • Assess key metrics and report on existing service desk architecture.
    • Design a target service desk architecture and assess how to meet the new requirements.
    • Deploy a strategic roadmap to build the consolidated service desk architecture.

    Executive summary

    Situation

    Every organization must grow to survive. Good growth makes an organization more agile, responsive, and competitive, which leads to further growth.

    The proliferation of service desks is a hallmark of good growth when it empowers the service of diverse end users, geographies, or technologies.

    Complication

    Growth has its dark side. Bad growth within a business can hinder agility, responsiveness, and competitiveness, leading to stagnation.

    Supporting a large number of service desks can be costly and inefficient, and produce poor or inconsistent customer service, especially when each service desk uses different ITSM processes and technologies.

    Resolution

    Manage the dark side of growth. Consolidating service desks can help standardize ITSM processes, improve customer service, improve service desk efficiency, and reduce total support costs. A consolidation is a highly visible and mission critical project, and one that will change the public face of IT. Organizations need to get it right.

    Building a consolidated service desk is an exercise in organizational change. The success of the project will hinge on how well the organization engages those who will be most affected by the change. Build a guiding coalition for the project, create a shared vision, enlist a team of volunteers to lead the change, and communicate with key stakeholders early and often.

    Use a structured approach to facilitate the development of a shared strategic vision, design a detailed consolidated architecture, and anticipate resistance to change to ensure the organization reaps project benefits.

    Info-Tech Insight

    1. Every step should put people first. It’s tempting to focus the strategy on designing processes and technologies for the target architecture. However, the most common barrier to success is workforce resistance to change.
    2. A consolidated service desk is an investment, not a cost-reduction program. Focus on efficiency, customer service, and end-user satisfaction. Cost savings, and there will be many, should be seen as an indirect consequence of the pursuit of efficiency and customer service.

    Focus the service desk consolidation project on improving customer service to overcome resistance to change

    Emphasizing cost reduction as the most important motivation for the consolidation project is risky.

    End-user satisfaction is a more reliable measure of a successful consolidation.

    • Too many variables affect the impact of the consolidation on the operating costs of the service desk to predict the outcome reliably.
    • Potential reductions in costs are unlikely to overcome organizational resistance to change.
    • Successful service desk consolidations can increase ticket volume as agents capture tickets more consistently and increase customer service.

    The project will generate many cost savings, but they will take time to manifest, and are best seen as an indirect consequence of the pursuit of customer service.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Business units facing a service desk consolidation are often concerned that the project will lead to a loss of access to IT resources. Focus on building a customer-focused consolidated service desk to assuage those fears and earn their support.

    End users, IT leaders, and process owners recognize the importance of the service desk.

    2nd out of 45

    On average, IT leaders and process owners rank the service desk 2nd in terms of importance out of 45 core IT processes. Source: Info-Tech Research Group, Management and Governance Diagnostic (2015, n = 486)

    42.1%

    On average, end users who were satisfied with service desk effectiveness rated all other IT services 42.1% higher than dissatisfied end users. Source: Info-Tech Research Group, End-User Satisfaction Survey 2015, n = 133)

    38.0%

    On average, end users who were satisfied with service desk timeliness rated all other IT services 38.0% higher than dissatisfied end users. Source: Info-Tech Research Group, End-User Satisfaction Survey (2015, n = 133)

    Overcome the perceived barriers from differing service unit cultures to pursue a consolidated service desk (CSD)

    In most organizations, the greatest hurdles that consolidation projects face are related to people rather than process or technology.

    In a survey of 168 service delivery organizations without a consolidated service desk, the Service Desk Institute found that the largest internal barrier to putting in place a consolidated service desk was organizational resistance to change.

    Specifically, more than 56% of respondents reported that the different cultures of each service unit would hinder the level of collaboration such an initiative would require.

    The image is a graph titled Island cultures are the largest barrier to consolidation. The graph lists Perceived Internal Barriers to CSD by percentage. The greatest % barrier is Island cultures, with executive resistance the next highest.

    Service Desk Institute (n = 168, 2007)

    Info-Tech Insight

    Use a phased approach to overcome resistance to change. Focus on quick-win implementations that bring two or three service desks together in a short time frame and add additional service desks over time.

    Avoid the costly proliferation of service desks that can come with organizational growth

    Good and bad growth

    Every organization must grow to survive, and relies heavily on its IT infrastructure to do that. Good growth makes an organization more agile, responsive, and competitive, and leads to further growth.

    However, growth has its dark side. Bad growth hobbles agility, responsiveness, and competitiveness, and leads to stagnation.

    As organizations grow organically and through mergers, their IT functions create multiple service desks across the enterprise to support:

    • Large, diverse user constituencies.
    • Rapidly increasing call volumes.
    • Broader geographic coverage.
    • A growing range of products and services.

    A hallmark of bad growth is the proliferation of redundant and often incompatible ITSM services and processes.

    Project triggers:

    • Organizational mergers
    • ITSM tool purchase
    • Service quality or cost-reduction initiatives
    Challenges arising from service desk proliferation:
    Challenge Impact
    Incompatible Technologies
    • Inability to negotiate volume discounts.
    • Costly skill set maintenance.
    • Increased support costs.
    • Increased shadow IT.
    Inconsistent Processes
    • Low efficiency.
    • High support costs.
    • Inconsistent support quality.
    • Less staffing flexibility.
    Lack of Data Integration
    • Only partial view of IT.
    • Inefficient workflows.
    • Limited troubleshooting ability.
    Low Customer Satisfaction
    • Fewer IT supporters.
    • Lack of organizational support.

    Consolidate service desks to integrate the resources, processes, and technology of your support ecosystem

    What project benefits can you anticipate?

    • Consolidated Service Desk
      • End-user group #1
      • End-user group #2
      • End-user group #3
      • End-user group #4

    A successful consolidation can significantly reduce cost per transaction, speed up service delivery, and improve the customer experience through:

    • Single point of contact for end users.
    • Integrated ITSM solution where it makes sense.
    • Standardized processes.
    • Staffing integration.
    Project Outcome

    Expected Benefit

    Integrated information The capacity to produce quick, accurate, and segmented reports of service levels across the organization.
    Integrated staffing Flexible management of resources that better responds to organizational needs.
    Integrated technology Reduced tool procurement costs, improved data integration, and increased information security.
    Standardized processes Efficient and timely customer service and a more consistent customer experience.

    Standardized and consolidated service desks will optimize infrastructure, services, and resources benefits

    • To set up a functioning service desk, the organization will need to invest resources to build and integrate tier 1, tier 2, and tier 3 capabilities to manage incidents and requests.
    • The typical service desk (Figure 1) can address a certain number of tickets from all three tiers. If your tickets in a given tier are less than that number, you are paying for 100% of service costs but consuming only a portion of it.
    • The consolidated model (Figure 2) reduces the service cost by reducing unused capacity.
    • Benefits of consolidation include a single service desk solution, a single point of contact for the business, data integration, process standardization, and consolidated administration, reporting, and management.

    The image is a graphic showing 2 figures. The first shows ring graphs labelled Service Desk 1 and Service Desk 2, with the caption Service provisioning with distinct service desks. Figure 2 shows one graphic, captioned Service provisioning with Consolidated service providers. At the bottom of the image, there is a legend.

    Info-Tech’s approach to service desk consolidation draws on key metrics to establish a baseline and a target state

    The foundation of a successful service desk consolidation initiative is a robust current state assessment. Given the project’s complexity, however, determining the right level of detail to include in the evaluation of existing service desks can be challenging.

    The Info-Tech approach to service desk consolidation includes:

    • Envisioning exercises to set project scope and garner executive support.
    • Surveys and interviews to identify the current state of people, processes, technologies, and service level agreements (SLAs) in each service desk, and to establish a baseline for the consolidated service desk.
    • Service desk comparison tools to gather the results of the current state assessment for analysis and identify current best practices for migration to the consolidated service desk.
    • Case studies to illustrate the full scope of the project and identify how different organizations deal with key challenges.

    The project blueprint walks through a method that helps identify which processes and technologies from each service desk work best, and it draws on them to build a target state for the consolidated service desk.

    Inspiring your target state from internal tools and best practices is much more efficient than developing new tools and processes from scratch.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The two key hurdles that a successful service desk consolidation must overcome are organizational complexity and resistance to change.

    Effective planning during the current state assessment can overcome these challenges.

    Identify existing best practices for migration to the consolidated service desk to foster agent engagement and get the consolidated service desk up quickly.

    A consolidation project should include the following steps and may involve multiple transition phases to complete

    Phase 1: Develop a Shared Vision

    • Identify stakeholders
    • Develop vision
    • Measure baseline

    Phase 2: Design the Consolidation

    • Design target state
    • Assess gaps to reach target
    • Assess logistics and cost

    Phase 3: Plan the Transition

    • Develop project plan and roadmap
    • Communicate changes
    • Make the transition
      • Evaluate and prepare for next transition phase (if applicable)
      • Evaluate and stabilize
        • CSI

    Whether or not your project requires multiple transition waves to complete the consolidation depends on the complexity of the environment.

    For a more detailed breakdown of this project’s steps and deliverables, see the next section.

    Follow Info-Tech’s methodology to develop a service desk consolidation strategy

    Phases Phase 1: Develop a Shared Vision Phase 2: Design the Consolidated Service Desk Phase 3: Plan the Transition
    Steps 1.1 - Identify and engage key stakeholders 2.1 - Design target consolidated service desk 3.1 - Build the project roadmap
    1.2 - Develop a vision to give the project direction
    1.3 - Conduct a full assessment of each service desk 2.2 - Assess logistics and cost of consolidation 3.2 - Communicate the change
    Tools & Templates Executive Presentation Consolidate Service Desk Scorecard Tool Service Desk Consolidation Roadmap
    Consolidate Service Desk Assessment Tool Consolidated Service Desk SOP Communications and Training Plan Template
    Service Desk Efficiency Calculator News Bulletin & FAQ Template
    Service Desk Consolidation TCO Comparison Tool

    Service desk consolidation is the first of several optimization projects focused on building essential best practices

    Info-Tech’s Service Desk Methodology aligns with the ITIL framework

    Extend

    Facilitate the extension of service management best practices to other business functions to improve productivity and position IT as a strategic partner.

    Standardize

    Build essential incident, service request, and knowledge management processes to create a sustainable service desk that meets business needs.

    Improve

    Build a continual improvement plan for the service desk to review and evaluate key processes and services, and manage the progress of improvement initiatives.

    Adopt Lean

    Build essential incident, service request, and knowledge management processes to create a sustainable service desk that boosts business value.

    Select and Implement

    Review mid-market and enterprise service desk tools, select an ITSM solution, and build an implementation plan to ensure your investment meets your needs.

    Consolidate

    Build a strategic roadmap to consolidate service desks to reduce end-user support costs and sustain end-user satisfaction.

    Our Approach to the Service Desk

    Service desk optimization goes beyond the blind adoption of best practices.

    Info-Tech’s approach focuses on controlling support costs and making the most of IT’s service management expertise to improve productivity.

    Complete the projects sequentially or in any order.

    Info-Tech draws on the COBIT framework, which focuses on consistent delivery of IT services across the organization

    The image shows Info-Tech's IT Management & Governance Framework. It is a grid of boxes, which are colour-coded by category. The framework includes multiple connected categories of research, including Infrastructure & Operations, where Service Desk is highlighted.

    Oxford University IT Service Desk successfully undertook a consolidation project to merge five help desks into one

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Higher Education

    Source: Oxford University, IT Services

    Background

    Until 2011, three disparate information technology organizations offered IT services, while each college had local IT officers responsible for purchasing and IT management.

    ITS Service Desk Consolidation Project

    Oxford merged the administration of these three IT organizations into IT Services (ITS) in 2012, and began planning for the consolidation of five independent help desks into a single robust service desk.

    Complication

    The relative autonomy of the five service desks had led to the proliferation of different tools and processes, licensing headaches, and confusion from end users about where to acquire IT service.

    Oxford University IT at a Glance

    • One of the world’s oldest and most prestigious universities.
    • 36 colleges with 100+ departments.
    • Over 40,000 IT end users.
    • Roughly 350 ITS staff in 40 teams.
    • 300 more distributed IT staff.
    • Offers more than 80 services.

    Help Desks:

    • Processes → Business Services & Projects
    • Processes → Computing Services
    • Processes → ICT Support Team

    "IT Services are aiming to provide a consolidated service which provides a unified and coherent experience for users. The aim is to deliver a ‘joined-up’ customer experience when users are asking for any form of help from IT Services. It will be easier for users to obtain support for their IT – whatever the need, service or system." – Oxford University, IT Services

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    “Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

    Workshop

    “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

    Consulting

    “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Build a Service Desk Consolidation Strategy – project overview

    1. Develop shared vision 2. Design consolidation 3. Plan transition
    Best-Practice Toolkit

    1.1 Identify and engage key stakeholders

    1.2 Develop a vision to give the project direction

    1.3 Conduct a full assessment of each service desk

    2.1 Design target consolidated service desk

    2.2 Assess logistics and cost of consolidation

    3.1 Build project roadmap

    3.2 Communicate the change

    Guided Implementations
    • Build the project team and define their roles and responsibilities, then identify key stakeholders and formulate an engagement plan
    • Develop an executive visioning session plan to formulate and get buy-in for the goals and vision of the consolidation
    • Use diagnostics results and the service desk assessment tool to evaluate the maturity and environment of each service desk
    • Define the target state of the consolidated service desk in detail
    • Identify requirements for the consolidation, broken down by people, process, technology and by short- vs. long-term needs
    • Plan the logistics of the consolidation for process, technology, and facilities, and evaluate the cost and cost savings of consolidation with a TCO tool
    • Identify specific initiatives for the consolidation project and evaluate the risks and dependencies for each, then plot initiatives on a detailed project roadmap
    • Brainstorm potential objections and questions and develop a communications plan with targeted messaging for each stakeholder group
    Onsite Workshop

    Module 1: Engage stakeholders to develop a vision for the service desk

    Module 2: Conduct a full assessment of each service desk

    Module 3: Design target consolidated service desk Module 4: Plan for the transition

    Phase 1 Outcomes:

    • Stakeholder engagement and executive buy-in
    • Vision for the consolidation
    • Comprehensive assessment of each service desk’s performance

    Phase 2 Outcomes:

    • Defined requirements, logistics plan, and target state for the consolidated service desk
    • TCO comparison

    Phase 3 Outcomes:

    • Detailed consolidation project roadmap
    • Communications plan and FAQs

    Info-Tech delivers: Use our tools and templates to accelerate your project to completion

    • Service Desk Assessment Tool (Excel)
    • Executive Presentation (PowerPoint)
    • Service Desk Scorecard Comparison Tool (Excel)
    • Service Desk Efficiency Calculator (Excel)
    • Service Desk Consolidation Roadmap (Excel)
    • Service Desk Consolidation TCO Tool (Excel)
    • Communications and Training Plan (Word)
    • Consolidation News Bulletin & FAQ Template (PowerPoint)

    Measured value for Guided Implementations (GIs)

    Engaging in GIs doesn’t just offer valuable project advice, it also results in significant cost savings.

    GI Measured Value
    Phase 1:
    • Time, value, and resources saved by using Info-Tech’s methodology to engage stakeholders, develop a project vision, and assess your current state.
    • For example, 2 FTEs * 10 days * $80,000/year = $6,200
    Phase 2:
    • Time, value, and resources saved by using Info-Tech’s tools and templates to design the consolidated service desk and evaluate cost and logistics.
    • For example, 2 FTEs * 5 days * $80,000/year = $3,100
    Phase 3:
    • Time, value, and resources saved by following Info-Tech’s tools and methodology to build a project roadmap and communications plan.
    • For example, 1 FTE * 5 days * $80,000/year = $1,500
    Total savings $10,800

    Workshop overview

    Contact your account representative or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Pre-Workshop Workshop Day 1 Workshop Day 2 Workshop Day 3 Workshop Day 4
    Activities

    Module 0: Gather relevant data

    0.1 Conduct CIO Business Vision Survey

    0.2 Conduct End-User Satisfaction Survey

    0.3 Measure Agent Satisfaction

    Module 1: Engage stakeholders to develop a vision for the service desk

    1.1 Identify key stakeholders and develop an engagement plan

    1.2 Brainstorm desired service desk attributes

    1.3 Conduct an executive visioning session to craft a vision for the consolidated service desk

    1.4 Define project goals, principles, and KPIs

    Module 2: Conduct a full assessment of each service desk

    2.1 Review the results of diagnostic programs

    2.2 Map organizational structure and roles for each service desk

    2.3 Assess overall maturity and environment of each service desk

    2.4 Assess current information system environment

    Module 3: Design target consolidated service desk

    3.1 Identify requirements for target consolidated service desk

    3.2 Build requirements document and shortlist for ITSM tool

    3.3 Use the scorecard comparison tool to assess the gap between existing service desks and target state

    3.4 Document standardized processes for new service desk

    Module 4: Plan for the transition

    4.1 Plan the logistics of the transition

    4.2 Assess the cost and savings of consolidation to refine business case

    4.3 Identify initiatives and develop a project roadmap

    4.4 Plan communications for each stakeholder group

    Deliverables
    1. CIO Business Vision Survey Diagnostic Results
    2. End-User Satisfaction Survey Diagnostic Results
    1. Stakeholder Engagement Workbook
    2. Executive Presentation
    1. Consolidate Service Desk Assessment Tool
    1. Consolidate Service Desk Scorecard Tool
    2. Consolidated Service Desk SOP
    1. Consolidation TCO Tool
    2. Executive Presentation
    3. Consolidation Roadmap
    4. Communications Plan
    5. News Bulletin & FAQ Template

    Insight breakdown

    Phase 1 Insight

    Don’t get bogged down in the details. A detailed current state assessment is a necessary first step for a consolidation project, but determining the right level of detail to include in the evaluation can be challenging. Gather enough data to establish a baseline and make an informed decision about how to consolidate, but don’t waste time collecting and evaluating unnecessary information that will only distract and slow down the project, losing management interest and buy-in.

    How we can help

    Leverage the Consolidate Service Desk Assessment Tool to gather the data you need to evaluate your existing service desks.

    Phase 2 Insight

    Select the target state that is right for your organization. Don’t feel pressured to move to a complete consolidation with a single point of contact if it wouldn’t be compatible with your organization’s needs and abilities, or if it wouldn’t be adopted by your end users. Design an appropriate level of standardization and centralization for the service desk and reinforce and improve processes moving forward.

    How we can help

    Leverage the Consolidate Service Desk Scorecard Tool to analyze the gap between your existing processes and your target state.

    Phase 3 Insight

    Getting people on board is key to the success of the consolidation, and a communication plan is essential to do so. Develop targeted messaging for each stakeholder group, keeping in mind that your end users are just as critical to success as your staff. Know your audience, communicate to them often and openly, and ensure that every communication has a purpose.

    How we can help

    Leverage the Communications Plan and Consolidation News Bulletin & FAQ Template to plan your communications.

    Phase 1

    Develop a Shared Vision

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 1: Develop shared vision

    Proposed Time to Completion (in weeks): 4-8

    Step 1.1: Identify and engage key stakeholders

    Discuss with an analyst:

    • Build the project team and define their roles and responsibilities
    • Identify key stakeholders and formulate an engagement plan

    Then complete these activities…

    • Assign project roles and responsibilities
    • Identify key stakeholders
    • Formalize an engagement plan and conduct interviews

    With these tools & templates:

    Stakeholder Engagement Workbook

    Step 1.2: Develop a vision to give the project direction

    Discuss with an analyst:

    • Develop an executive visioning session plan to formulate and get buy-in for the goals and vision of the consolidation

    Then complete these activities…

    • Host an executive visioning exercise to define the scope and goals of the consolidation

    With these tools & templates:

    Consolidate Service Desk Executive Presentation

    Step 1.3: Conduct a full assessment of each service desk

    Discuss with an analyst:

    • Use diagnostics results and the service desk assessment tool to evaluate the maturity and environment of each service desk
    • Assess agent skills, satisfaction, roles and responsibilities

    Then complete these activities…

    • Analyze organizational structure
    • Assess maturity and environment of each service desk
    • Assess agent skills and satisfaction

    With these tools & templates:

    Consolidate Service Desk Assessment Tool

    IT Skills Inventory and Gap Assessment Tool

    Phase 1 Outcome:

    • A common vision for the consolidation initiative, an analysis of existing service desk architectures, and an inventory of existing best practices.

    Step 1.1: Get buy-in from key stakeholders

    Phase 1

    Develop a shared vision

    1.1 Identify and engage key stakeholders

    1.2 Develop a vision to give the project direction

    1.3 Conduct a full assessment of each service desk

    This step will walk you through the following activities:
    • 1.1.1 Assign roles and responsibilities
    • 1.1.2 Identify key stakeholders for the consolidation
    • 1.1.3 Conduct stakeholder interviews to understand needs in more depth, if necessary
    This step involves the following participants:
    • Project Sponsor
    • CIO or IT Director
    • Project Manager
    • IT Managers and Service Desk Manager(s)
    Step Outcomes:
    • A project team with clearly defined roles and responsibilities
    • A list of key stakeholders and an engagement plan to identify needs and garner support for the change

    Oxford consulted with people at all levels to ensure continuous improvement and new insights

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Higher Education

    Source: Oxford University, IT Services

    Motivation

    The merging of Oxford’s disparate IT organizations was motivated primarily to improve end-user service and efficiency.

    Similarly, ITS positioned the SDCP as an “operational change,” not to save costs, but to provide better service to their customers.

    "The University is quite unique in the current climate in that reduction in costs was not one of the key drivers behind the project. The goal was to deliver improved efficiencies and offer a single point of contact for their user base." – Peter Hubbard, ITSM Consultant Pink Elephant

    Development

    Oxford recognized early that they needed an open and collaborative environment to succeed.

    Key IT and business personnel participated in a “vision workshop” to determine long- and short-term objectives, and to decide priorities for the consolidated service desk.

    "Without key support at this stage many projects fail to deliver the expected outcomes. The workshop involved the key stakeholders of the project and was deemed a successful and positive exercise, delivering value to this stage of the project by clarifying the future desired state of the Service Desk." – John Ireland, Director of Customer Service & Project Sponsor

    Deployment

    IT Services introduced a Service Desk Consolidation Project Blog very early into the project, to keep everyone up-to-date and maintain key stakeholder buy-in.

    Constant consultation with people at all levels led to continuous improvement and new insights.

    "We also became aware that staff are facing different changes depending on the nature of their work and which toolset they use (i.e. RT, Altiris, ITSM). Everyone will have to change the way they do things at least a little – but the changes depend on where you are starting from!" – Jonathan Marks, Project Manager

    Understand and validate the consolidation before embarking on the project

    Define what consolidation would mean in the context of your organization to help validate and frame the scope of the project before proceeding.

    What is service desk consolidation?

    Service desk consolidation means combining multiple service desks into one centralized, single point of contact.

    • Physical consolidation = personnel and assets are combined into a single location
    • Virtual consolidation = service desks are combined electronically

    Consolidation must include people, process, and technology:

    1. Consolidation of some or all staff into one location
    2. Consolidation of processes into a single set of standardized processes
    3. One consolidated technology platform or ITSM tool

    Consolidation can take the form of:

    1. Merging multiple desks into one
    2. Collapsing multiple desks into one
    3. Connecting multiple desks into a virtual desk
    4. Moving all desks to one connected platform

    Service Desk 1 - Service Desk 2 - Service Desk 3

    Consolidated Service Desk

    Info-Tech Insight

    Consolidation isn’t for everyone.

    Before you embark on the project, think about unique requirements for your organization that may necessitate more than one service desk, such as location-specific language. Ask yourself if consolidation makes sense for your organization and would achieve a benefit for the organization, before proceeding.

    1.1 Organize and build the project team to launch the project

    Solidify strong support for the consolidation and get the right individuals involved from the beginning to give the project the commitment and direction it requires.

    Project Sponsor
    • Has direct accountability to the executive team and provides leadership to the project team.
    • Legitimatizes the consolidation and provides necessary resources to implement the project.
    • Is credible, enthusiastic, and understands the organization’s culture and values.
    Steering Committee
    • Oversees the effort.
    • Ensures there is proper support from the organization and provides resources where required.
    • Resolves any conflicts.
    Core Project Team
    • Full-time employees drawn from roles that are critical to the service desk, and who would have a strong understanding of the consolidation goals and requirements.
    • Ideal size: 6-10 full-time employees.
    • May include roles defined in the next section.

    Involve the right people to drive and facilitate the consolidation

    Service desk consolidations require broad support and capabilities beyond only those affected in order to deal with unforeseen risks and barriers.

    • Project manager: Has primary accountability for the success of the consolidation project.
    • Senior executive project sponsor: Needed to “open doors” and signal organization’s commitment to the consolidation.
    • Technology SMEs and architects: Responsible for determining and communicating requirements and risks of the technology being implemented or changed, especially the ITSM tool.
    • Business unit leads: Responsible for identifying and communicating impact on business functions, approving changes, and helping champion change.
    • Product/process owners: Responsible for identifying and communicating impact on business functions, approving changes, and helping champion change.
    • HR specialists: Most valuable when roles and organizational design are affected, i.e. the consolidation requires staff redeployment or substantial training (not just using a new system or tool but acquiring new skills and responsibilities) or termination.
    • Training specialists: If you have full-time training staff in the organization, you will eventually need them to develop training courses and material. Consulting them early will help with scoping, scheduling, and identifying the best resources and channels to deliver the training.
    • Communications specialists (internal): Valuable in crafting communications plan, required if communications function owns internal communications.

    Use a RACI table (e.g. in the following section) to clarify who is to be accountable, responsible, consulted, and informed.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The more transformational the change, the more it will affect the organizational chart – not just after the implementation but through the transition.

    Take time early in the project to define the reporting structure for the project/transition team, as well as any teams and roles supporting the transition.

    Assign roles and responsibilities

    1.1.1 Use a RACI chart to assign overarching project responsibilities

    Participants
    • Project Sponsor
    • IT Director, CIO
    • Project Manager
    • IT Managers and Service Desk Manager(s)
    What You'll Need
    • RACI chart

    RACI = Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed

    The RACI chart will provide clarity for overarching roles and responsibilities during the consolidation.

    1. Confirm and modify the columns to match the stakeholders in your organization.
    2. Confirm and modify the roles listed as rows if there are obvious gaps or opportunities to consolidate rows.
    3. Carefully analyze and document the roles as a group.
    Task Project Sponsor Project Manager Sr. Executives SMEs Business Lead Service Desk Managers HR Trainers Communications
    Meeting project objectives A R A R R
    Identifying risks and opportunities R A A C C C C I I
    Assessing current state I A I R C R
    Defining target state I A I C C R
    Planning logistics I A I R R C R
    Building the action plan I A C R R R R R R
    Planning and delivering communications I A C C C C R R A
    Planning and delivering training I A C C C C R R C
    Gathering and analyzing feedback and KPIs I A C C C C C R R

    Identify key stakeholders to gather input from the business, get buy-in for the project, and plan communications

    Identify the key stakeholders for the consolidation to identify the impact consolidation will have on them and ensure their concerns don’t get lost.

    1. Use a stakeholder analysis to identify the people that can help ensure the success of your project.
    2. Identify an Executive Sponsor
      • A senior-level project sponsor is someone who will champion the consolidation project and help sell the concept to other stakeholders. They can also ensure that necessary financial and human resources will be made available to help secure the success of the project. This leader should be someone who is credible, tactful, and accessible, and one who will not only confirm the project direction but also advocate for the project.

    Why is a stakeholder analysis essential?

    • Ignoring key stakeholders is an important cause of failed consolidations.
    • You can use the opinions of the most influential stakeholders to shape the project at an early stage.
    • Their support will secure resources for the project and improve the quality of the consolidation.
    • Communicating with key stakeholders early and often will ensure they fully understand the benefits of your project.
    • You can anticipate the reaction of key stakeholders to your project and plan steps to win their support.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Be diverse and aware. When identifying key stakeholders for the project, make sure to include a rich diversity of stakeholder expertise, geography, and tactics. Also, step back and add silent members to your list. The loudest voices and heaviest campaigners are not necessarily your key stakeholders.

    Identify key stakeholders for the consolidation

    1.1.2 Identify project stakeholders, particularly project champions

    Participants
    • CIO/IT Director
    • Project Sponsor
    • Project Manager
    • IT Managers
    What You’ll Need
    • Whiteboard or flip chart and markers

    Goal: Create a prioritized list of people who are affected or can affect your project so you can plan stakeholder engagement and communication.

    • Use an influence/commitment matrix to determine where your stakeholders lie.
    • High influence, high commitment individuals should be used in conjunction with your efforts to help bring others on board. Identify these individuals and engage with them immediately.
    • Beware of the high influence, low commitment individuals. They should be the first priority for engagement.
    • High commitment, low influence individuals can be used to help influence the low influence, low commitment individuals. Designate a few of these individuals as “champions” to help drive engagement on the front lines.

    Outcome: A list of key stakeholders to include on your steering committee and your project team, and to communicate with throughout the project.

    The image is a matrix, with Influence on the Y-axis and Commitment to change on the X-axis. It is a blank template.

    Overcome the value gap by gathering stakeholder concerns

    Simply identifying and engaging your stakeholders is not enough. There needs to be feedback: talk to your end users to ensure their concerns are heard and determine the impact that consolidation will have on them. Otherwise, you risk leaving value on the table.

    • Talk to the business end users who will be supported by the consolidated service desk.
    • What are their concerns about consolidation?
    • Which functions and services are most important to them? You need to make sure these won't get lost.
    • Try to determine what impact consolidation will have on them.

    According to the Project Management Institute, only 25% of individuals fully commit to change. The remaining 75% either resist or simply accept the change. Gathering stakeholder concerns is a powerful way to gain buy-in.

    The image is a graph with Business Value on the Y-Axis and Time on the X-Axis. Inside the graph, there is a line moving horizontally, separated into segments: Installation, Implementation, and Target Value. The line inclines during the first two segments, and is flat during the last. Emerging from the space between Installation and Implementation is a second line marked Actual realized value. The space between the target value line and the actual realized value line is labelled: Value gap.

    Collect relevant quantitative and qualitative data to assess key stakeholders’ perceptions of IT across the organization

    Don’t base your consolidation on a hunch. Gather reliable data to assess the current state of IT.

    Solicit direct feedback from the organization to gain critical insights into their perceptions of IT.

    • CIO Business Vision: Understanding the needs of your stakeholders is the first and most important step in building a consolidation strategy. Use the results of this survey to assess the satisfaction and importance of different IT services.
    • End-User Satisfaction: Solicit targeted department feedback on core IT service capabilities, IT communications, and business enablement. Use the results to assess the satisfaction of end users with each service broken down by department and seniority level.

    We recommend completing at least the End-User Satisfaction survey as part of your service desk consolidation assessment and planning. An analyst will help you set up the diagnostic and walk through the report with you.

    To book a diagnostic, or get a copy of our questions to inform your own survey, visit Info-Tech’s Benchmarking Tools, contact your account manager, or call toll-free 1-888-670-8889 (US) or 1-844-618-3192 (CAN).

    Data-Driven Diagnostics:

    End-User Satisfaction Survey

    CIO Business Vision

    Review the results of your diagnostics in step 1.3

    Formalize an engagement plan to cultivate support for the change from key stakeholders

    Use Info-Tech’s Stakeholder Engagement Workbook to formalize an engagement strategy

    If a more formal engagement plan is required for this project, use Info-Tech’s Stakeholder Engagement Workbook to document an engagement strategy to ensure buy-in for the consolidation.

    The engagement plan is a structured and documented approach for gathering requirements by eliciting input and validating plans for change and cultivating sponsorship and support from key stakeholders early in the project lifecycle.

    The Stakeholder Engagement Workbook situates stakeholders on a grid that identifies which ones have the most interest in and influence on your project, to assist you in developing a tailored engagement strategy.

    You can also use this analysis to help develop a communications plan for each type of stakeholder in step 3.2.

    Conduct stakeholder interviews to understand needs in more depth, if necessary

    1.1.3 Interview key stakeholders to identify needs

    • If the consolidation will be a large and complex project and there is a need to understand requirements in more depth, conduct stakeholder interviews with “high-value targets” who can help generate requirements and promote communication around requirements at a later point.
    • Choose the interview method that is most appropriate based on available resources.
    Method Description Assessment and Best Practices Stakeholder Effort Business Analyst Effort
    Structured One-on-One Interview In a structured one-on-one interview, the business analyst has a fixed list of questions to ask the stakeholder and follows up where necessary. Structured interviews provide the opportunity to quickly hone in on areas of concern that were identified during process mapping or group elicitation techniques. They should be employed with purpose – to receive specific stakeholder feedback on proposed requirements or help identify systemic constraints. Generally speaking, they should be 30 minutes or less. Low

    Medium

    Unstructured One-on-One Interview In an unstructured one-on-one interview, the business analyst allows the conversation to flow freely. The BA may have broad themes to touch on, but does not run down a specific question list. Unstructured interviews are most useful for initial elicitation, when brainstorming a draft list of potential requirements is paramount. Unstructured interviews work best with senior stakeholders (sponsors or power users), since they can be time consuming if they’re applied to a large sample size. It’s important for BAs not to stifle open dialog and allow the participants to speak openly. They should be 60 minutes or less. Medium Low

    Step 1.2: Develop a vision to give the project direction

    Phase 1

    Develop a shared vision

    1.1 Get buy-in from key stakeholders

    1.2 Develop a vision to give the project direction

    1.3 Conduct a full assessment of each service desk

    This step will walk you through the following activities:
    • 1.2.1 Brainstorm desired attributes for the consolidated service desk to start formulating a vision
    • 1.2.2 Develop a compelling vision and story of change
    • 1.2.3 Create a vision for the consolidated service desk
    • 1.2.4 Identify the purpose, goals, and guiding principles of the consolidation project
    • 1.2.5 Identify anticipated benefits and associated KPIs
    • 1.2.6 Conduct a SWOT analysis on the business
    This step involves the following participants:
    • Project Sponsor
    • IT Director, CIO
    • IT Managers and Service Desk Manager(s)
    • Business Executives
    Step outcomes

    A shared vision for the consolidated service desk that:

    • Defines the scope of the consolidation
    • Encompasses the goals and guiding principles of the project
    • Identifies key attributes of the consolidated service desk and anticipated benefits it will bring
    • Is documented in an executive presentation

    Hold an executive visioning session to kick off the project

    A major change such as service desk consolidation requires a compelling vision to engage staff and motivate them to comprehend and support the change.

    After identifying key stakeholders, gather them in a visioning session or workshop to establish a clear direction for the project.

    An executive visioning session can take up to two days of focused effort and activities with the purpose of defining the short and long-term view, objectives, and priorities for the new consolidated service desk.

    The session should include the following participants:

    • Key stakeholders identified in step 1.1, including:
      • IT management and CIO
      • Project sponsor
      • Business executives interested in the project

    The session should include the following tasks:

    • Identify and prioritize the desired outcome for the project
    • Detail the scope and definition of the consolidation
    • Identify and assess key problems and opportunities
    • Surface and challenge project assumptions
    • Clarify the future desired state of the service desk
    • Determine how processes, functions, and systems are to be included in a consolidation analysis
    • Establish a degree of ownership by senior management

    The activities throughout this step are designed to be included as part of the visioning session

    Choose the attributes of your desired consolidated service desk

    Understand what a model consolidated service desk should look like before envisioning your target consolidated service desk.

    A consolidated service desk should include the following aspects:

    • Handles all customer contacts – including internal and external users – across all locations and business units
    • Provides a single point of contact for end users to submit requests for help
    • Handles both incidents and service requests, as well as any additional relevant ITIL modules such as problem, change, or asset management
    • Consistent, standardized processes and workflows
    • Single ITSM tool with workflows for ticket handling, prioritization, and escalations
    • Central data repository so that staff have access to all information needed to resolve issues quickly and deliver high-quality service, including:
      • IT infrastructure information (such as assets and support contracts)
      • End-user information (including central AD, assets and products owned, and prior interactions)
      • Knowledgebase containing known resolutions and workarounds

    Consolidated Service Desk

    • Service Desk 1
    • Service Desk 2
    • Service Desk 3
    • Consolidated staff
    • Consolidated ITSM tool
    • Consolidated data repository

    Brainstorm desired attributes for the consolidated service desk to start formulating a vision

    1.2.1 Identify the type of consolidation and desired service desk attributes

    Participants
    • Project Sponsor
    • IT Director, CIO
    • IT Managers and Service Desk Manager(s)
    • Other interested business executives
    What You'll Need
    • Whiteboard or flip chart and markers
    Document

    Document in the Consolidate Service Desk Executive Presentation, slide 6.

    Brainstorm the model and attributes of the target consolidated service desk. You will use this to formulate a vision and define more specific requirements later on.
    1. Identify the type of consolidation: virtual, physical, or hybrid (both)
    2. Identify the level of consolidation: partial (some service desks consolidated) or complete (all service desks consolidated)
    Consolidated Service Desk Model Level of Consolidation
    Partial Complete
    Type of Consolidation Virtual
    Physical
    Hybrid

    3. As a group, brainstorm and document a list of attributes that the consolidated service desk should have.

    Examples:

    • Single point of contact for all users
    • One ITSM tool with consistent built-in automated workflows
    • Well-developed knowledgebase
    • Self-serve portal for end users with ability to submit and track tickets
    • Service catalog

    Develop a compelling vision and story of change

    1.2.2 Use a vision table to begin crafting the consolidation vision

    Participants
    • Project Sponsor
    • IT Director, CIO
    • IT Managers and Service Desk Manager(s)
    • Other interested business executives
    What You'll Need
    • Whiteboard or flip chart and markers
    Document

    Document in the Consolidate Service Desk Executive Presentation, slide 7.

    Build desire for change.

    In addition to standard high-level scope elements, consolidation projects that require organizational change also need a compelling story or vision to influence groups of stakeholders.

    Use the vision table below to begin developing a compelling vision and story of change.

    Why is there a need to consolidate service desks?
    How will consolidation benefit the organization? The stakeholders?
    How did we determine this is the right change?
    What would happen if we didn’t consolidate?
    How will we measure success?

    Develop a vision to inspire and sustain leadership and commitment

    Vision can be powerful but is difficult to craft. As a result, vision statements often end up being ineffective (but harmless) platitudes.

    A service desk consolidation project requires a compelling vision to energize staff and stakeholders toward a unified goal over a sustained period of time.

    Great visions:

    • Tell a story. They describe a journey with a beginning (who we are and how we got here) and a destination (our goals and expected success in the future).
    • Convey an intuitive sense of direction (or “spirit of change”) that helps people act appropriately without being explicitly told what to do.
    • Appeal to both emotion and reason to make people want to be part of the change.
    • Balance abstract ideas with concrete facts. Without concrete images and facts, the vision will be meaninglessly vague. Without abstract ideas and principles, the vision will lack power to unite people and inspire broad support.
    • Are concise enough to be easy to communicate and remember in any situation.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Tell a story. Stories pack a lot of information into few words. They are easy to write, remember, and most importantly – share. It’s worth spending a little extra time to get the details right.

    Create a vision for the consolidated service desk

    1.2.3 Tell a story to describe the consolidated service desk vision

    Participants
    • Project Sponsor
    • IT Director, CIO
    • IT Managers and Service Desk Manager(s)
    What You'll Need
    • Whiteboard or flip chart and markers
    • Document in the Executive Presentation, slide 8.

    Craft a vision of the future state of the service desk.

    Tell a story.

    Stories serve to give the consolidation real-world context by describing what the future state will mean for both staff and users of the service desk. The story should sum up the core of the experience of using the consolidated service desk and reflect how the service desk will fit into the life of the user.

    Stories should include:

    • Action describing the way things happen.
    • Contextual detail that helps readers relate to the person in the story.
    • Challenging ideas that contradict common belief and may be disruptive, but help suggest new directions.
    Example:

    Imagine if…

    … users could access one single online service that allows them to submit a ticket through a self-service portal and service catalog, view the status of their ticket, and receive updates about organization-wide outages and announcements. They never have to guess who to contact for help with a particular type of issue or how to contact them as there is only one point of contact for all types of incidents and service requests.

    … all users receive consistent service delivery regardless of their location, and never try to circumvent the help desk or go straight to a particular technician for help as there is only one way to get help by submitting a ticket through a single service desk.

    … tickets from any location could be easily tracked, prioritized, and escalated using standardized definitions and workflows to ensure consistent service delivery and allow for one set of SLAs to be defined and met across the organization.

    Discuss the drivers of the consolidation to identify the goals the project must achieve

    Identifying the reasons behind the consolidation will help formulate the vision for the consolidated service desk and the goals it should achieve.

    The image is a graph, titled Deployment Drivers for Those Planning a Consolidated Service Desk. From highest to lowest, they are: Improved Service Delivery/Increased Productivity; Drive on Operational Costs; and Perceived Best Practice.

    Service Desk Institute (n = 20, 2007)

    A survey of 233 service desks considering consolidation found that of the 20 organizations that were in the planning stages of consolidation, the biggest driver was to improve service delivery and/or increase productivity.

    This is in line with the recommendation that improved service quality should be the main consolidation driver over reducing costs.

    This image is a graph titled Drivers Among Those Who Have Implemented a Consolidated Service Desk. From highest to lowest, they are: Improved Service Delivery/Increased Productivity; Best Practice; Drive on Operational Costs; Internal vs Outsourcing; and Legacy.

    Service Desk Institute (n = 43, 2007)

    The drivers were similar among the 43 organizations that had already implemented a consolidated service desk, with improved service delivery and increased productivity again the primary driver.

    Aligning with best practice was the second most cited driver.

    Identify the purpose, goals, and guiding principles of the consolidation project

    1.2.4 Document goals of the project

    Participants
    • Project Sponsor
    • IT Director, CIO
    • IT Managers and Service Desk Manager(s)
    What You'll Need
    • Whiteboard or flip chart and markers
    • Document in the Executive Presentation, slide 9.

    Use the results of your stakeholder analysis and interviews to facilitate a discussion among recommended participants and document the purpose of the consolidation project, the goals the project aims to achieve, and the guiding principles that must be followed.

    Use the following example to guide your discussion:

    Purpose The purpose of consolidating service desks is to improve service delivery to end users and free up more time and resources to achieve the organization’s core mission.
    Goals
    • Align IT resources with business strategies and priorities
    • Provide uniform quality and consistent levels of service across all locations
    • Improve the end-user experience by reducing confusion about where to get help
    • Standardize service desk processes to create efficiencies
    • Identify and eliminate redundant functions or processes
    • Combine existing resources to create economies of scale
    • Improve organizational structure, realign staff with appropriate job duties, and improve career paths
    Guiding Principles

    The consolidated service desk must:

    1. Provide benefit to the organization without interfering with the core mission of the business
    2. Balance cost savings with service quality
    3. Increase service efficiency without sacrificing service quality
    4. Not interfere with service delivery or the experience of end users
    5. Be designed with input from key stakeholders

    Identify the anticipated benefits of the consolidation to weigh them against risks and plan future communications

    The primary driver for consolidation of service desks is improved service delivery and increased productivity. This should relate to the primary benefits delivered by the consolidation, most importantly, improved end-user satisfaction.

    A survey of 43 organizations that have implemented a consolidated service desk identified the key benefits delivered by the consolidation (see chart at right).

    The image is a bar graph titled Benefits Delivered by Consolidated Service Desk. The benefits, from highest to lowest are: Increased Customer Satisfaction; Optimised Resourcing; Cost Reduction; Increased Productivity/Revenue; Team Visibility/Ownership; Reporting/Accountability.

    Source: Service Desk Institute (n = 43, 2007)

    Info-Tech Insight

    Cost reduction may be an important benefit delivered by the consolidation effort, but it should not be the most valuable benefit delivered. Focus communications on anticipated benefits for improved service delivery and end-user satisfaction to gain buy-in for the project.

    Identify anticipated outcomes and benefits of consolidation

    1.2.5 Use a “stop, start, continue” exercise to identify KPIs

    What You'll Need
    • Whiteboard or flip chart and markers
    Participants
    • Project Sponsor
    • IT Director, CIO
    • IT Managers and Service Desk Manager(s)
    Document

    Document in the Executive Presentation, slide 10

    1. Divide the whiteboard into 3 columns: stop, start, and continue
    2. Identify components of your service desk that:
    • Are problematic and should be phased out (stop)
    • Provide value but are not in place yet (start)
    • Are effective and should be sustained, if not improved (continue)
  • For each category, identify initiatives or outcomes that will support the desired goals and anticipated benefits of consolidation.
  • Stop Start Continue
    • Escalating incidents without following proper protocol
    • Allowing shoulder taps
    • Focusing solely on FCR as a measure of success
    • Producing monthly ticket trend reports
    • Creating a self-serve portal
    • Communicating performance to the business
    • Writing knowledgebase articles
    • Improving average TTR
    • Holding weekly meetings with team members

    Use a SWOT analysis to assess the service desk

    • A SWOT analysis is a structured planning method that organizations can use to evaluate the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats involved in a project or business venture.
    • Use a SWOT analysis to identify the organization’s current IT capabilities and classify potential disruptive technologies as the first step toward preparing for them.
    Review these questions...
    Strengths (Internal) Weaknesses (Internal)
    • What Service Desk processes provide value?
    • How does the Service Desk align with corporate/IT strategy?
    • How does your Service Desk benefit end users?
    • Does the Service Desk produce reports or data that benefit the business?
    • Does your Service Desk culture offer an advantage?
    • What areas of your service desk require improvement?
    • Are there gaps in capabilities?
    • Do you have budgetary limitations?
    • Are there leadership gaps (succession, poor management, etc.)?
    • Are there reputational issues with the business?
    Opportunities (External) Threats (External)
    • Are end users adopting hardware or software that requires training and education for either themselves or the Service Desk staff?
    • Can efficiencies be gained by consolidating our Service Desks?
    • What is the most cost-effective way to solve the user's technology problems and get them back to work?
    • How can we automate Service Desk processes?
    • Are there obstacles that the Service Desk must face?
    • Are there issues with respect to sourcing of staff or technologies?
    • Could the existing Service Desk metrics be affected?
    • Will the management team need changes to their reporting?
    • Will SLAs need to be adjusted?

    …to help you conduct your SWOT analysis on the service desk.

    Strengths (Internal) Weaknesses (Internal)
    • End user satisfaction >80%
    • Comprehensive knowledgebase
    • Clearly defined tiers
    • TTR on tickets is <1 day
    • No defined critical incident workflow
    • High cost to solve issues
    • Separate toolsets create disjointed data
    • No root cause analysis
    • Ineffective demand planning
    • No clear ticket categories
    Opportunities (External) Threats (External)
    • Service catalog
    • Ticket Templates
    • Ticket trend analysis
    • Single POC through the use of one tool
    • Low stakeholder buy-in
    • Fear over potential job loss
    • Logistics of the move
    • End user alienation over process change

    Conduct a SWOT analysis on the business

    1.2.6 Conduct SWOT analysis

    Participants
    • Project Sponsor
    • IT Director, CIO
    • IT Managers and Service Desk Manager(s)
    What You'll Need
    • Whiteboard or flip chart and markers
    Document
    • Document in the Executive Presentation, slide 11
    1. Break the group into two teams:
    • Assign team A strengths and weaknesses.
    • Assign team B opportunities and threats.
  • Have the teams brainstorm items that fit in their assigned areas.
    • Refer to the questions on the previous slide to help guide discussion
  • Choose someone from each group to fill in the grid on the whiteboard.
  • Conduct a group discussion about the items on the list.
  • Helpful to achieving the objective Harmful to achieving the objective
    Internal origin attributes of the organization Strengths Weaknesses

    External Origin attributes of the environment

    Opportunities Threats

    Frame your project in terms of people, process, technology

    A framework should be used to guide the consolidation effort and provide a standardized basis of comparison between the current and target state.

    Frame the project in terms of the change and impact it will have on:

    • People
    • Process
    • Technology

    Service desk consolidation will likely have a significant impact in all three categories by standardizing processes, implementing a single service management tool, and reallocating resources. Framing the project in this way will ensure that no aspect goes forgotten.

    For each of the three categories, you will identify:

    • Current state
    • Target state
    • Gap and actions required
    • Impact, risks, and benefits
    • Communication and training requirements
    • How to measure progress/success

    People

    • Tier 1 support
    • Tier 2 support
    • Tier 3 support
    • Vendors

    Process

    • Incident management
    • Service request management
    • SLAs

    Technology

    • ITSM tools
    • Knowledgebase
    • CMDB and other databases
    • Technology supported

    Complete the Consolidate Service Desk Executive Presentation

    Complete an executive presentation using the decisions made throughout this step

    Use the Consolidate Service Desk Executive Presentation to deliver the outputs of your project planning to the business and gain buy-in for the project.

    1. Use the results of the activities throughout step 1.2 to produce the key takeaways for your executive presentation.
    2. At the end of the presentation, include 1-2 slides summarizing any additional information specific to your organization.
    3. Once complete, pitch the consolidation project to the project sponsor and executive stakeholders.
      • This presentation needs to cement buy-in for the project before any other progress is made.

    Step 1.3: Conduct a full assessment of each service desk

    Phase 1

    Develop a shared vision

    1.1 Get buy-in from key stakeholders

    1.2 Develop a vision to give the project direction

    1.3 Conduct a full assessment of each service desk

    This step will walk you through the following activities:
    • 1.3.1 Review the results of your diagnostic programs
    • 1.3.2 Analyze the organizational structure of each service desk
    • 1.3.3 Assess the overall maturity of each service desk
    • 1.3.4 Map out roles and responsibilities of each service desk using organizational charts
    • 1.3.5 Assess and document current information system environment
    This step involves the following participants:
    • CIO
    • IT Directors
    • Service Desk Managers
    • Service Desk Technicians
    Step outcomes
    • A robust current state assessment of each service desk, including overall maturity, processes, organizational structure, agent skills, roles and responsibilities, agent satisfaction, technology and ITSM tools.

    Oxford saved time and effort by sticking with a tested process that works

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Higher Education

    Source: Oxford University, IT Services

    Oxford ITS instigated the service desk consolidation project in the fall of 2012.

    A new ITSM solution was formally acquired in the spring 2014, and amalgamated workflows designed.

    Throughout this period, at least 3 detailed process analyses occurred in close consultation with the affected IT units.

    Responsibility for understanding each existing process (incident, services, change management, etc.) were assigned to members of the project team.

    They determined which of the existing processes were most effective, and these served as the baseline – saving time and effort in the long run by sticking with tested processes that work.

    Reach out early and often.

    Almost from day one, the Oxford consolidation team made sure to consult closely with each relevant ITS team about their processes and the tools they used to manage their workflows.

    This was done both in structured interviews during the visioning stage and informally at periodic points throughout the project.

    The result was the discovery of many underlying similarities. This information was then instrumental to determining a realistic baseline from which to design the new consolidated service desk.

    "We may give our activities different names or use different tools to manage our work but in all cases common sense has prevailed and it’s perhaps not so surprising that we have common challenges that we choose to tackle in similar ways." – Andrew Goff, Change Management at Oxford ITS

    Review the results of your diagnostic programs to inform your current state assessment

    1.3.1 Understand satisfaction with the service desk

    Participants
    • CIO/IT Director
    • IT Manager
    • Service Manager(s)
    Document
    1. Set up an analyst call through your account manager to review the results of your diagnostic.
    • Whatever survey you choose, ask the analyst to review the data and comments concerning:
      • Assessments of service desk timeliness/effectiveness
      • IT business enablement
      • IT innovation leadership
  • Book a meeting with recommended participants. Go over the results of your diagnostic survey.
  • Facilitate a discussion of the results. Focus on the first few summary slides and the overall department results slide.
    • What is the level of IT support?
    • What are stakeholders’ perceptions of IT performance?
    • How satisfied are stakeholders with IT?
    • Does the department understand and act on business needs?
    • What are the business priorities and how well are you doing in meeting these priorities?
    • How can the consolidation project assist the business in achieving goals?
    • How could the consolidation improve end-user satisfaction and business satisfaction?
  • A robust current state assessment is the foundation of a successful consolidation

    You can’t determine where you’re going without a clear idea of where you are now.

    Before you begin planning for the consolidation, make sure you have a clear picture of the magnitude of what you plan on consolidating.

    Evaluate the current state of each help desk being considered for consolidation. This should include an inventory of:

    • Process:
      • Processes and workflows
      • Metrics and SLAs
    • People:
      • Organizational structure
      • Agent workload and skills
      • Facility layout and design
    • Technology:
      • Technologies and end users supported
      • Technologies and tools used by the service desk

    Info-Tech Insight

    A detailed current state assessment is a necessary first step for a consolidation project, but determining the right level of detail to include in the evaluation can be challenging. Gather enough data to establish a baseline and make an informed decision about how to consolidate, but don’t waste time collecting unnecessary information that will only distract and slow down the project.

    Review ticket handling processes for each service desk to identify best practices

    Use documentation, reports, and metrics to evaluate existing processes followed by each service desk before working toward standardized processes.

    Poor Processes vs. Optimized Processes

    Inconsistent or poor processes affect the business through:

    • Low business satisfaction
    • Low end-user satisfaction
    • High cost to resolve
    • Delayed progress on project work
    • Lack of data for reporting due to ineffective ticket categorization, tools, and logged tickets
    • No root cause analysis leads to a reactive vs. proactive service desk
    • Lack of cross-training and knowledge sharing result in time wasted troubleshooting recurring issues
    • Lack of trend analysis limits the effectiveness of demand planning

    Standardized service desk processes increase user and technician satisfaction and lower costs to support through:

    • Improved business satisfaction Improved end-user satisfaction Incidents prioritized and escalated accurately and efficiently
    • Decreased recurring issues due to root cause analysis and trends
    • Increased self-sufficiency of end users
    • Strengthened team and consistent delivery through cross-training and knowledge sharing
    • Enhanced demand planning through trend analysis and reporting

    The image is a graphic of a pyramid, with categories as follows (from bottom): FAQ/Knowledgebase; Users; Tier 1-75-80%; Tier 2-15%; Tier 3 - 5%. On the right side of the pyramid is written Resolution, with arrows extending from each of the higher sections down to Users. On the left is written Escalation, with arrows from each lower category up to the next highest. Inside the pyramid are arrows extending from the bottom to each level and vice versa.

    Analyze the organizational structure of each service desk

    1.3.2 Discuss the structure of each service desk

    Participants
    • CIO
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    • Service Desk Technicians
    What You'll Need
    • Consolidate Service Desk Assessment Tool

    1. Facilitate a discussion among recommended participants to discuss the structure of each service desk. Decide which model best describes each service desk:

    • The Gatekeeper Model: All calls are routed through a central call group whose sole responsibility is to link the customer to the right individual or group.
    • The Call Sorting Model: All calls are sorted into categories using technology and forwarded to the right 2nd level specialist group.
    • Tiered Structure (Specialist Model): All calls are sorted through a single specialist group, such as desktop support. Their job is to log the interaction, attempt resolution, and escalate when the problem is beyond their ability to resolve.
    • Tiered Structure (Generalist Model): All calls are sorted through a single generalist group, whose responsibility is to log the interaction, attempt a first resolution, and escalate when the problem is beyond their ability to resolve.

    2. Use a flip chart or whiteboard to draw the architecture of each service desk, using the example on the right as a guide.

    The image is a graphic depicting the organizational structure of a service desk, from Users to Vendor. The graphic shows how a user request can move through tiers of service, and the ways that Tiers 2 and 3 of the service desk are broken down into areas of specialization.

    Assess the current state of each service desk using the Consolidate Service Desk Assessment Tool

    Assess the current state of each service desk

    The Consolidate Service Desk Assessment Tool will provide insight into the overall health of each existing service desk along two vectors:

    1. Process Maturity (calculated on the basis of a comprehensive survey)
    2. Metrics (calculated on the basis of entered ticket and demographic data)

    Together these answers offer a snapshot of the health, efficiency, performance, and perceived value of each service desk under evaluation.

    This tool will assist you through the current state assessment process, which should follow these steps:

    1. Send a copy of this tool to the Service Desk Manager (or other designated party) of each service desk that may be considered as part of the consolidation effort.
      • This will collect key metrics and landscape data and assess process maturity
    2. Analyze the data and discuss as a group
    3. Ask follow-up questions
    4. Use the information to compare the health of each service desk using the scorecard tool

    These activities will be described in more detail throughout this step of the project.

    Gather relevant data to assess the environment of each service desk

    Assess each service desk’s environment using the assessment tool

    Send a copy of the Consolidate Service Desk Assessment Tool to the Service Desk Manager (or other designated party) of each service desk that will be considered as part of the consolidation.

    Instruct them to complete tab 2 of the tool, the Environment Survey:

    • Enter Profile, Demographic, Satisfaction, Technology, and Ticket data into the appropriate fields as accurately as possible. Satisfaction data should be entered as percentages.
    • Notes can be entered next to each field to indicate the source of the data, to note missing or inaccurate data, or to explain odd or otherwise confusing data.

    This assessment will provide an overview of key metrics to assess the performance of each service desk, including:

    • Service desk staffing for each tier
    • Average ticket volume and distribution per month
    • # staff in IT
    • # service desk staff
    • # supported devices (PC, laptops, mobiles, etc.)
    • # desktop images

    Assess the overall maturity of each service desk

    1.3.3 Use the assessment tool to measure the maturity of each service desk

    Participants
    • CIO
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    • Service Desk Technicians
    What You'll Need
    • Consolidate Service Desk Assessment Tool
    1. Assemble the relevant team for each service desk: process owners, functional managers, service desk manager, and relevant staff and technicians who work with the processes to be assessed. Each service desk team should meet to complete the maturity assessment together as a group.
    2. Go to tab 3 (Service Desk Maturity Survey) of the Consolidate Service Desk Assessment Tool and respond to the questions in the following categories:
    • Prerequisites (general questions)
    • People
    • Process
    • Technology
    • SLAs
  • Rate each element. Be honest. The goal is to end up with as close a representation as possible to what really exists. Only then can you identify realistic improvement opportunities. Use the maturity definitions as guides.
  • Evaluate resource utilization and satisfaction to allocate resources effectively

    Include people as part of your current state assessment to evaluate whether your resources are appropriately allocated to maximize effectiveness and agent satisfaction.

    Skills Inventory

    Use the IT Skills Inventory and Gap Assessment Tool to assess agent skills and identify gaps or overlaps.

    Agent Satisfaction

    Measure employee satisfaction and engagement to identify strong teams.

    Roles and Responsibilities

    Gather a clear picture of each service desk’s organizational hierarchy, roles, and responsibilities.

    Agent Utilization

    Obtain a snapshot of service desk productivity by calculating the average amount of time an agent is handling calls, divided by the average amount of time an agent is at work.

    Conduct a skills inventory for each service desk

    Evaluate agent skills across service desks

    After evaluating processes, evaluate the skill sets of the agents tasked with following these processes to identify gaps or overlap.

    Send the Skills Coverage Tool tab to each Service Desk Manager, who will either send it to the individuals who make up their service desk with instructions to rate themselves, or complete the assessment together with individuals as part of one-on-one meetings for discussing development plans.

    IT Skills Inventory and Gap Assessment Tool will enable you to:

    • List skills required to support the organization.
    • Document and rate the skills of the existing IT staffing contingent.
    • Assess the gaps to help determine hiring or training needs, or even where to pare back.
    • Build a strategy for knowledge sharing, transfer, and training through the consolidation project.

    Map out roles and responsibilities of each service desk using organizational charts

    1.3.4 Obtain or draw organizational charts for each location

    Clearly document service desk roles and responsibilities to rationalize service desk architecture.
    Participants
    • CIO, IT Director
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    • Tier/Specialist Manager(s)
    What You’ll Need
    • Org. charts
    • Flip chart or whiteboard and markers
    1. Obtain or draw (on a whiteboard or flip chart) the organizational chart for each service desk to get a clear picture of the roles that fulfill each service desk. If there is any uncertainty or disagreement, discuss as a group to come to a resolution.
    2. Discuss the roles and reporting relationships within the service desk and across the organization to establish if/where inefficiencies exist and how these might be addressed through consolidation.
    3. If an up-to-date organizational chart is not in place, use this time to define the organizational structure as-is and consider future state.
    IT Director
    Service Desk Manager
    Tier 1 Help Desk Lead Tier 2 Help Desk Lead Tier 2 Apps Support Lead Tier 3 Specialist Support Lead
    Tier 1 Specialist Name Title Name Title Name Title
    Tier 1 Specialist Name Title Name Title Name Title
    Name Title Name Title Name Title
    Name Title Name Title

    Conduct an agent satisfaction survey to compare employee engagement across locations

    Evaluate agent satisfaction

    End-user satisfaction isn’t the only important satisfaction metric.

    Agent satisfaction forms a key metric within the Consolidate Service Desk Assessment Tool, and it can be evaluated in a variety of ways. Choose the approach that best suits your organization and time restraints for the project.

    Determine agent satisfaction on the basis of a robust (and anonymous) survey of service desk agents. Like the end-user satisfaction score, this measure is ideally computed as a percentage.

    There are several ways to measure agent satisfaction:

    1. If your organization runs an employee engagement survey, use the most recent survey results, separating them by location and converting them to a percentage.
    2. If your organization does not currently measure employee engagement or satisfaction, consider one of Info-Tech and McLean & Company’s two engagement diagnostics:
      • Full Engagement Diagnostic – 81 questions that provide a comprehensive view into your organization's engagement levels
      • McLean & Company’s Pulse Survey – 15 questions designed to give a high-level view of employee engagement
    3. For smaller organizations, a survey may not be feasible or make sense. In this case, consider gathering informal engagement data through one-on-one meetings.
    4. Be sure to discuss and document any reasons for dissatisfaction, including pain points with the current tools or processes.
    Document
    • Document on tab 2 of the Consolidate Service Desk Assessment Tool

    Assess the service management tools supporting your service desks

    Identify the different tools being used to support each service desk in order to assess whether and how they can be consolidated into one service management tool.

    Ideally, your service desks are already on the same ITSM platform, but if not, a comprehensive assessment of current tools is the first step toward a single, consolidated solution.

    Include the following in your tools assessment:

    • All automated ITSM solutions being used to log and track incidents and service requests
    • Any manual or other methods of tracking tickets (e.g. Excel spreadsheets)
    • Configurations and any customizations that have been made to the tools
    • How configuration items are maintained and how mature the configuration management databases (CMDB) are
    • Pricing and licensing agreements for tools
    • Any unique functions or limitations of the tools

    Info-Tech Insight

    Document not only the service management tools that are used but also any of their unique and necessary functions and configurations that users may have come to rely upon, such as remote support, self-serve, or chat support, in order to inform requirements in the next phase.

    Assess the IT environment your service desks support

    Even if you don’t do any formal asset management, take this opportunity for discovery and inventory to gain a complete understanding of your IT environment and the range of devices your service desks support.

    Inventory your IT environment, including:

    User Devices

    • Device counts by category Equipment/resources by user

    Servers

    • Server hardware, CPU, memory
    • Applications residing on servers

    Data centers

    • Including location and setup

    In addition to identifying the range of devices you currently support, assess:

    • Any future devices, hardware, or software that the service desk will need to support (e.g. BYOD, mobile)
    • How well each service desk is currently able to support these devices
    • Any unique or location-specific technology or devices that could limit a consolidation

    Info-Tech Insight

    The capabilities and configuration of your existing infrastructure and applications could limit your consolidation plans. A comprehensive technology assessment of not only the service desk tools but also the range of devices and applications your service desks supports will help you to prepare for any potential limitations or obstacles a consolidated service desk may present.

    Assess and document current information system environment

    1.3.5 Identify specific technology and tool requirements

    Participants
    • CIO
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    • Service Desk Technicians
    What You'll Need
    • Consolidate Service Desk Assessment Tool, tab 2.
    Document

    Document information on number of devices supported and number of desktop images associated with each service desk in the section on “Technology Data” of the Consolidate Service Desk Assessment Tool.

    1. Identify and document the service management tools that are used by each service desk.
    2. For each tool, identify and document any of the following that apply:
    • Integrations
    • Configurations that were made during implementation
    • Customizations that were made during implementation
    • Version, licenses, cost
  • For each service desk, document any location-specific or unique technology requirements or differences that could impact consolidation, including:
    • Devices and technology supported
    • Databases and configuration items
    • Differing applications or hardware needs
  • If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    1.1.1 Assign roles and responsibilities

    Use a RACI chart to assign overarching responsibilities for the consolidation project.

    1.3.2 Analyze the organizational structure of each service desk

    Map out the organizational structure and flow of each service desk and discuss the model that best describes each.

    Phase 2

    Design the Consolidated Service Desk

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 2: Design consolidated service desk

    Proposed Time to Completion (in weeks): 2-4

    Step 2.1: Model target consolidated service desk

    Start with an analyst kick-off call:

    • Define the target state of the consolidated service desk in detail
    • Identify requirements for the consolidation, broken down by people, process, technology and by short- vs. long-term needs

    Then complete these activities…

    • Set project metrics to measure success of the consolidation
    • Brainstorm people, process, technology requirements for the service desk
    • Build requirements documents and RFP for a new tool
    • Review results of the scorecard comparison tool

    With these tools & templates:

    Consolidate Service Desk Scorecard Tool

    Step 2.2: Assess logistics and cost of consolidation

    Review findings with analyst:

    • Plan the logistics of the consolidation for process, technology, and facilities
    • Evaluate the cost and cost savings of consolidation using a TCO tool

    Then complete these activities…

    • Plan logistics for process, technology, facilities, and resource allocation
    • Review the results of the Service Desk Efficiency Calculator to refine the business case for the consolidation project

    With these tools & templates:

    Service Desk Efficiency Calculator

    Service Desk Consolidation TCO Comparison Tool

    Phase 2 Results:

    • Detailed requirements and vision for the consolidated service desk, gap analysis of current vs. target state, and an initial analysis of the logistical considerations to achieve target.

    Step 2.1: Model target consolidated state

    Phase 2

    Design consolidation

    2.1 Design target consolidated service desk

    2.2 Assess logistics and cost of consolidation

    This step will walk you through the following activities:
    • 2.1.1 Determine metrics to measure the value of the project
    • 2.1.2 Set targets for each metric to measure progress and success of the consolidation
    • 2.1.3 Brainstorm process requirements for consolidated service desk
    • 2.1.4 Brainstorm people requirements for consolidated service desk
    • 2.1.5 Brainstorm technology requirements for consolidated service desk
    • 2.1.6 Build a requirements document for the service desk tool
    • 2.1.7 Evaluate alternative tools, build a shortlist for RFPs, and arrange web demonstrations or evaluation copies
    • 2.1.8 Set targets for key metrics to identify high performing service desks
    • 2.1.9 Review the results of the scorecard to identify best practices
    This step involves the following participants:
    • CIO
    • IT Director
    • Service Desk Managers
    • Service Desk Technicians
    Step Outcomes
    • A list of people, process, and technology requirements for the new consolidated service desk
    • A clear vision of the target state
    • An analysis of the gaps between existing and target service desks

    Ensure the right people and methods are in place to anticipate implementation hurdles

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Higher Education

    Source: Oxford University, IT Services

    "Since our last update, a review and re-planning exercise has reassessed the project approach, milestones, and time scales. This has highlighted some significant hurdles to transition which needed to be addressed, resulting primarily from the size of the project and the importance to the department of a smooth and well-planned transition to the new processes and toolset." – John Ireland, Director of Customer Service & Project Sponsor

    Initial hurdles led to a partial reorganization of the project in Fall 2014

    Despite careful planning and its ultimate success, Oxford’s consolidation effort still encountered some significant hurdles along the way – deadlines were sometimes missed and important processes overlooked.

    These bumps can be mitigated by building flexibility into your plan:

    • Adopt an Agile methodology – review and revise groups of tasks as the project progresses, rather than waiting until near the end of the project to get approval for the complete implementation.
    • Your Tiger Team or Project Steering Group must include the right people – the project team should not just include senior or high-level management; members of each affected IT group should be consulted, and junior-level employees can provide valuable insight into existing and potential processes and workflows.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Ensure that the project lead is someone conversant in ITSM, so that they are equipped to understand and react to the unique challenges and expectations of a consolidation and can easily communicate with process owners.

    Use the consolidation vision to define the target service desk in more detail

    Use your baseline assessment and your consolidation vision as a guide to figure out exactly where you’re going before planning how to get there.

    With approval for the project established and a clear idea of the current state of each service desk, narrow down the vision for the consolidated service desk into a specific picture of the target state.

    The target state should provide answers to the following types of questions:

    Process:

    • Will there be one set of SLAs across the organization?
    • What are the target SLAs?
    • How will ticket categories be defined?
    • How will users submit and track their tickets?
    • How will tickets be prioritized and escalated?
    • Will a knowledgebase be maintained and accessible by both service desk and end users?

    People:

    • How will staff be reorganized?
    • What will the roles and responsibilities look like?
    • How will tiers be structured?
    • What will the career path look like within the service desk?

    Technology:

    • Will there be one single ITSM tool to support the service desk?
    • Will an existing tool be used or will a new tool be selected?
    • If a new tool is needed, what are the requirements?

    Info-Tech Insight

    Select the target state that is right for your organization. Don’t feel pressured to select the highest target state or a complete consolidation. Instead select the target state that is most compatible with your organization’s current needs and capabilities.

    Determine metrics to measure the value of the project

    2.1.1 Identify KPIs to measure the success of the consolidation

    Participants
    • CIO
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    • Service Desk Technicians
    What You’ll Need
    • Whiteboard or flip chart and markers

    Identify three primary categories where the consolidation project is expected to yield benefits to the business. Use the example on the right to guide your discussion.

    Efficiency and effectiveness are standard benefits for this project, but the third category may depend on your organization.

    • Examples include: improved resourcing, security, asset management, strategic alignment, end-user experience, employee experience

    Identify 1-3 key performance indicators (KPIs) associated with each benefit category, which will be used to measure the success of the consolidation project. Ensure that each has a baseline measure that can be reassessed after the consolidation.

    Efficiency

    Streamlined processes to reduce duplication of efforts

    • Reduced IT spend and cost of delivery
    • One ITSM tool Improved reliability of service
    • Improved response time

    Resourcing

    Improved allocation of human and financial resources

    • Improved resource sharing
    • Improved organizational structure of service desk

    Effectiveness

    Service delivery will be more accessible and standardized

    • Improved responsive-ness to incidents and service requests
    • Improved resolution time
    • Single point of contact for end users
    • Improved reporting

    Set targets for each metric to measure progress and success of the consolidation

    2.1.2 Identify specific metrics for each KPI and targets for each

    Participants
    • IT Director
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    • Service Desk Technicians
    What You’ll Need
    • KPIs from previous step
    • Whiteboard or flip chart and markers
    1. Select one core KPI for each critical success factor, which will be used to measure progress and success of the consolidation effort down the road.
    2. For each KPI, document the average baseline metric the organization is achieving (averaged across all service desks).
    3. Discuss and document a target metric that the project will aim to reach through the single consolidated service desk.
    4. Set a short and long-term target for each metric to encourage continuous improvement. Examples:
    Efficiency
    Business Value KPI Current Metric Short-Term (6 month) Target Long-Term (1 year) Target
    Streamlined processes to reduce duplication of efforts Improved response time 2 hours 1 hour 30 minutes
    Effectiveness
    Business Value KPI Current Metric Short-Term (6 month) Target Long-Term (1 year) Target
    Service delivery will be more accessible and standardized Improved first call resolution (% resolved at Tier 1) 50% 60% 70%

    If poor processes were in place, take the opportunity to start fresh with the consolidation

    If each service desk’s existing processes were subpar, it may be easier to build a new service desk from the basics rather than trying to adapt existing processes.

    You should have these service management essentials in place:

    Service Requests:

    • Standardize process to verify, approve, and fulfill service requests.
    • Assign priority according to business criticality and service agreements.
    • Think about ways to manage service requests to better serve the business long term.

    Incident Management:

    • Set standards to define and record incidents.
    • Define incident response actions and communications.

    Knowledgebase:

    • Define standards for knowledgebase.
    • Introduce creation of knowledgebase articles.
    • Create a knowledge-sharing and cross-training culture.

    Reporting:

    • Select appropriate metrics.
    • Generate relevant insights that shed light on the value that IT creates for the organization.

    The image is a circle comprised of 3 concentric circles. At the centre is a circle labelled Standardized Service Desk. The ring outside of it is split into 4 sections: Incident Management; Service Requests; Structure and Reporting; and Knowledgebase. The outer circle is split into 3 sections: People, Process, Technologies.

    Evaluate how your processes compare with the best practices defined here. If you need further guidance on how to standardize these processes after planning the consolidation, follow Info-Tech’s blueprint, Standardize the Service Desk.

    Even optimized processes will need to be redefined for the target consolidated state

    Your target state doesn’t have to be perfect. Model a short-term, achievable target state that can demonstrate immediate value.

    Consider the following elements when designing service desk processes:
    • Ticket input (i.e. how can tickets be submitted?)
    • Ticket classification (i.e. how will tickets be categorized?)
    • Ticket prioritization (i.e. how will critical incidents be defined?)
    • Ticket escalation (i.e. how and at what point will tickets be assigned to a more specialized resource?)
    • Ticket resolution (i.e. how will resolution be defined and how will users be notified?)
    • Communication with end users (i.e. how and how often will users be notified about the status of their ticket or of other incidents and outages?)

    Consider the following unique process considerations for consolidation:

    • How will knowledge sharing be enabled in order for all technicians to quickly access known errors and resolve problems?
    • How can first contact resolution levels be maintained through the transition?
    • How will procedures be clearly documented so that tickets are escalated properly?
    • Will ticket classification and prioritization schemes need to change?
    • Will new services such as self-serve be introduced to end users and how will this be communicated?

    Info-Tech Insight

    Don’t do it all at once. Consolidation will lead to some level of standardization. It will be reinforced and improved later through ongoing reengineering and process improvement efforts (continual improvement management).

    Brainstorm process requirements for consolidated service desk

    2.1.3 Identify process-related requirements for short and long term

    Participants
    • CIO
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    • Service Desk Technicians
    What You'll Need
    • Whiteboard, sticky notes, markers
    • Vision and goals for the consolidation from step 1.2
    Document
    • Document internally, or leave on a whiteboard for workshop participants to return to when documenting tasks in the roadmap tool.
    1. Review the questions in the previous section to frame a discussion on process considerations and best practices for the target consolidated service desk.
    2. Use your responses to the questions to brainstorm a list of process requirements or desired characteristics for the target state, particularly around incident management and service request management.
    3. Write each requirement onto a sticky note and categorize it as one of the following:
      1. Immediate requirement for consolidated service desk
      2. Implement within 6 months
      3. Implement within 1 year

    Example:

    Whiteboard:

    • Immediate
      • Clearly defined ticket prioritization scheme
      • Critical incident process workflow
    • 6 months
      • Clearly defined SOP, policies, and procedures
      • Transactional end-user satisfaction surveys
    • 1 year
      • Change mgmt.
      • Problem mgmt.

    Define the target resource distribution and utilization for the consolidated service desk

    Consolidation can sound scary to staff wondering if there will be layoffs. Reduce that by repurposing local staff and maximizing resource utilization in your organizational design.

    Consider the following people-related elements when designing your target state:

    • How will roles and responsibilities be defined for service desk staff?
    • How many agents will be required to deal with ticket demand?
    • What is the target agent utilization rate?
    • How will staff be distributed among tiers?
    • What will responsibilities be at each tier?
    • Will performance goals and rewards be established or standardized?

    Consider the following unique people considerations for consolidation:

    • Will staffing levels change?
    • Will job titles or roles change for certain individuals?
    • How will staff be reorganized?
    • Will staff need to be relocated to one location?
    • Will reporting relationships change?
    • How will this be managed?
    • How will performance measurements be consolidated across teams and departments to focus on the business goals?
    • Will there be a change to career paths?
    • What will consolidation do to morale, job interest, job opportunities?

    Info-Tech Insight

    Identify SMEs and individuals who are knowledgeable about a particular location, end-user base, technology, or service offering. They may be able to take on a different, greater role due to the reorganization that would make better use of their skills and capabilities and improve morale.

    Brainstorm people requirements for consolidated service desk

    2.1.4 Identify people-related requirements for short and long term

    Participants
    • CIO
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    • Service Desk Technicians
    What You'll Need
    • Whiteboard, sticky notes, markers
    • Vision and goals for the consolidation from step 1.2
    Document

    Document internally, or leave on a whiteboard for workshop participants to return to when documenting tasks in the roadmap tool.

    1. Review the questions in the previous section to frame a discussion on people considerations and best practices for the target consolidated service desk.
    2. Use your responses to the questions to brainstorm a list of requirements for the allocation and distribution of resources, including roles, responsibilities, and organizational structure.
    3. When thinking about people, consider requirements for both your staff and your end users.
    4. Write each requirement onto a sticky note and categorize it as one of the following:
      1. Immediate requirement for consolidated service desk
      2. Implement within 6 months
      3. Implement within 1 year

    Example:

    Whiteboard:

    • Immediate
      • Three tier structure with SMEs at Tier 2 and 3
      • All staff working together in one visible location
    • 6 months
      • Roles and responsibilities well defined and documented
      • Appropriate training and certifications available to staff
    • 1 year
      • Agent satisfaction above 80%
      • End-user satisfaction above 75%

    Identify the tools that will support the service desk and those the service desk will support

    One of the biggest technology-related decisions you need to make is whether you need a new ITSM tool. Consider how it will be used by a single service desk to support the entire organization.

    Consider the following technology elements when designing your target state:
    • What tool will be used to support the service desk?
    • What processes or ITIL modules can the tool support?
    • How will reports be produced? What types of reports will be needed for particular audiences?
    • Will a self-service tool be in place for end users to allow for password resets or searches for solutions?
    • Will the tool integrate with tools for change, configuration, problem, and asset management?
    • Will the majority of manual processes be automated?
    Consider the following unique technology considerations for consolidation:
    • Is an existing service management tool extensible?
    • If so, can it integrate with essential non-IT systems?
    • Can the tool support a wider user base?
    • Can the tool support all areas, departments, and technologies it will need to after consolidation?
    • How will data from existing tools be migrated to the new tool?
    • What implementation or configuration needs and costs must be considered?
    • What training will be required for the tool?
    • What other new tools and technologies will be required to support the consolidated service desk?

    Info-Tech Insight

    Talk to staff at each service desk to ask about their tool needs and requirements to support their work. Invite them to demonstrate how they use their tools to learn about customization, configuration, and functionality in place and to help inform requirements. Engaging staff in the process will ensure that the new consolidated tool will be supported and adopted by staff.

    Brainstorm technology requirements for consolidated service desk

    2.1.5 Identify technology-related requirements for short and long term

    Participants
    • CIO
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    • Service Desk Technicians
    What You’ll Need
    • Whiteboard, sticky notes, markers
    • Vision and goals for the consolidation from step 1.2
    Document

    Document internally, or leave on a whiteboard for workshop participants to return to when documenting tasks in the roadmap tool.

    1. Review the questions in the previous section to frame a discussion on technology considerations and best practices for the target consolidated service desk.
    2. Use your responses to the questions to brainstorm a list of requirements for the tools to support the consolidated service desk, along with any other technology requirements for the target state.
    3. Write each requirement onto a sticky note and categorize it as one of the following:
      1. Immediate requirement for consolidated service desk
      2. Implement within 6 months
      3. Implement within 1 year

    Example:

    Whiteboard:

    • Immediate
      • Single ITSM tool
      • Remote desktop support
    • 6 months
      • Self-service portal
      • Regular reports are produced accurately
    • 1 year
      • Mobile portal
      • Chat integration

    Identify specific requirements for a tool if you will be selecting a new ITSM solution

    Service desk software needs to address both business and technological needs. Assess these needs to identify core capabilities required from the solution.

    Features Description
    Modules
    • Do workflows integrate seamlessly between functions such as incident management, change management, asset management, desktop and network management?

    Self-Serve

    • Does the existing tool support self-serve in the form of web forms for incident reporting, forms for service requests, as well as FAQs for self-solve?
    • Is a service catalog available or can one be integrated painlessly?
    Enterprise Service Management Needs
    • Integration of solution to all of IT, Human Resources, Finance, and Facilities for workflows and financial data can yield great benefits but comes at a higher cost and greater complexity. Weigh the costs and benefits.
    Workflow Automation
    • If IT has advanced beyond simple workflows, or if extending these workflows beyond the department, more power may be necessary.
    • Full business process management (BPM) is part of a number of more advanced service desk/service management solutions.
    License Maintenance Costs
    • Are license and maintenance costs still reasonable and appropriate for the value of the tool?
    • Will the vendor renegotiate?
    • Are there better tools out there for the same or better price?
    Configuration Costs
    • Templates, forms, workflows, and reports all take time and skills but bring big benefits. Can these changes be done in-house? How much does it cost to maintain and improve?
    Speed / Performance
    • Data growth and volume may have reached levels beyond the current solution’s ability to cope, despite database tuning.
    Vendor Support
    • Is the vendor still supporting the solution and developing the roadmap? Has it been acquired? Is the level of support still meeting your needs?

    Build a requirements document for the service desk tool

    2.1.6 Create a requirements list and demo script for an ITSM tool (optional)

    Participants
    • CIO/IT Director
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    • Service Desk Technicians
    What You'll Need
    • Flip charts and markers
    • Templates:
      • IT Service Management Demo Script Template
      • Service Desk Software and RFP Evaluation Tool

    Create a requirements list for the service desk tool.

    1. Break the group into smaller functional groups.
    2. Brainstorm features that would be important to improving efficiencies, services to users, and visibility to data.
    3. Document on flip chart paper, labelling each page with the functional group name.
    4. Prioritize into must-have and nice-to-have items.
    5. Reconvene and discuss each list with the group.
    6. Info-Tech’s Service Desk Software and RFP Evaluation Tool can also be used to document requirements for an RFI.

    Create a demo script:

    Using information from the requirements list, determine which features will be important for the team to see during a demo. Focus on areas where usability is a concern, for example:

    • End-user experience
    • Workflow creation and modification
    • Creating templates
    • Creating service catalog items
    • Knowledgebase

    Evaluate alternative tools, build a shortlist for RFPs, and arrange web demonstrations or evaluation copies

    2.1.7 Identify an alternative tool and build an RFP (optional)

    Participants
    • CIO (optional)
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Service Desk Technician(s)
    • Service Desk Tool Administrator
    What You'll Need
    • Whiteboard or flip chart and markers
    • Service Desk RFP Template

    Evaluate current tool:

    • Investigate to determine if these features are present and just not in use.
    • Contact the vendor if necessary.
    • If enough features are present, determine if additional training is required.
    • If tool is proven to be inadequate, investigate options.

    Consider alternatives:

    Use Info-Tech’s blueprints for further guidance on selecting and implementing an ITSM tool

    1. Select a tool

    Info-Tech regularly evaluates ITSM solution providers and ranks each in terms of functionality and affordability. The results are published in the Enterprise and Mid-Market Service Desk Software Vendor Landscapes.

    2. Implement the tool

    After selecting a solution, follow the Build an ITSM Tool Implementation Plan project to develop an implementation plan to ensure the tool is appropriately designed, installed, and tested and that technicians are sufficiently trained to ensure successful deployment and adoption of the tool.

    Compare your existing service desks with the Consolidate Service Desk Scorecard Tool

    Complete the scorecard tool along with the activities of the next step

    The Consolidate Service Desk Scorecard Tool will allow you to compare metrics and maturity results across your service desks to identify weak and poor performers and processes.

    The purpose of this tool is to organize the data from up to six service desks that are part of a service desk consolidation initiative. Displaying this data in an organized fashion, while offering a robust comparative analysis, should facilitate the process of establishing a new baseline for the consolidated service desk.

    Use the results on tab 4 of the Consolidate Service Desk Assessment Tool. Enter the data from each service desk into tab “2. InfoCards” of the Consolidate Service Desk Scorecard Tool.

    Data from up to six service desks (up to six copies of the assessment tool) can be entered into this tool for comparison.

    Set targets for key metrics to identify high performing service desks

    2.1.8 Use the scorecard tool to set target metrics against which to compare service desks

    Participants
    • CIO or IT Director
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    What You’ll Need
    • Consolidate Service Desk Scorecard Tool
    1. Review the explanations of the six core metrics identified from the service desk assessment tool. These are detailed on tab 3 of the Consolidate Service Desk Scorecard Tool.
      1. End-user satisfaction
      2. Agent satisfaction
      3. Cost per ticket
      4. Agent utilization rate
      5. First contact resolution rate
      6. First tier resolution rate
    2. For each metric (except agent utilization), define a “worst” and “best” target number. These numbers should be realistic and determined only after some consideration.
    • Service desks scoring at or above the “best” threshold for a particular metric will receive 100% on that metric; while service desks scoring at or below the “worst” threshold for a particular metric will receive 0% on that metric.
    • For agent utilization, only a “best” target number is entered. Service desks hitting this target number exactly will receive 100%, with scores decreasing as a service desk’s agent utilization gets further away from this target.
  • Identify the importance of each metric and vary the values in the “weighting” column accordingly.
  • The values entered on this tab will be used in calculating the overall metric score for each service desk, allowing you to compare the performance of existing service desks against each other and against your target state.

    Review the results of the scorecard to identify best practices

    2.1.9 Discuss the results of the scorecard tool

    Participants
    • CIO or IT Director (optional)
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    What You'll Need
    • Consolidate Service Desk Scorecard Tool
    1. Facilitate a discussion on the results of the scorecard tool on tabs 4 (Overall Results), 5 (Maturity Results), and 6 (Metrics Results).
    2. Identify the top performing service desks(s) (SD Champions) as identified by the average of their metric and maturity scores.
    3. Identify the top performing service desk by maturity level (tab 5; Level 3 – Integrated or Optimized), paying particular attention to high scorers on process maturity and maturity in incident & service request management.
    4. Identify the top performing service desk by metric score (tab 6), paying particular attention to the metrics that tie into your KPIs.
    5. For those service desks, review their processes and identify what they are doing well to glean best practices.
      1. Incorporate best practices from existing high performing service desks into your target state.
      2. If one service desk is already performing well in all areas, you may choose to model your consolidated service desk after it.

    Document processes and procedures in an SOP

    Define the standard operating procedures for the consolidated service desk

    Develop one set of standard operating procedures to ensure consistent service delivery across locations.

    One set of standard operating procedures for the new service desk is essential for a successful consolidation.

    Info-Tech’s Consolidated Service Desk SOP Template provides a detailed example of documenting procedures for service delivery, roles and responsibilities, escalation and prioritization rules, workflows for incidents and service requests, and resolution targets to help ensure consistent service expectations across locations.

    Use this template as a guide to develop or refine your SOP and define the processes for the consolidated service desk.

    Step 2.2: Assess logistics and cost of consolidation

    Phase 2

    Design consolidation

    2.1 Design target consolidated state

    2.2 Assess logistics and cost

    This step will walk you through the following activities:
    • 2.2.1 Plan logistics for process, technology, and facilities
    • 2.2.2 Plan logistics around resource allocation
    • 2.2.3 Review the results of the Service Desk Efficiency Calculator to refine the business case for the consolidation project
    This step involves the following participants:
    • CIO or IT Director
    • Project Manager
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    Step outcomes
    • An understanding and list of tasks to accomplish to ensure all logistical considerations for the consolidation are accounted for
    • An analysis of the impact on staffing and service levels using the Service Desk Efficiency Calculator
    • An assessment of the cost of consolidation and the cost savings of a consolidated service desk using a TCO tool

    The United States Coast Guard’s consolidation saved $20 million in infrastructure and support costs

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: US Coast Guard

    Source: CIO Rear Adm. Robert E. Day, Jr. (retired)

    Challenges

    The US Coast Guard was providing internal IT support for 42,000 members on active duty from 11 distinct regional IT service centers around the US.

    Pain Points

    1. Maintaining 11 disparate IT architectures was costly and time consuming.
    2. Staffing inefficiencies limited the USCG’s global IT service operations to providing IT support from 8am to 4pm.
    3. Individual sites were unable to offload peak volume during heavier call loads to other facilities.
    4. Enforcing adherence to standard delivery processes, procedures, and methods was nearly impossible.
    5. Personnel didn’t have a single point of contact for IT support.
    6. Leadership has limited access to consolidated analytics.

    Outcomes

    • Significant reduction in infrastructure, maintenance, and support costs.
    • Reduced risk through comprehensive disaster recovery.
    • Streamlined processes and procedures improved speed of incident resolution.
    • Increased staffing efficiencies.
    • Deeper analytical insight into service desk performance.

    Admiral Day was the CIO from 2009 to 2014. In 2011, he lead an initiative to consolidate USCG service desks.

    Selecting a new location communicated the national mandate of the consolidated service desk

    Site Selection - Decision Procedures

    • Determine location criteria, including:
      • Access to airports, trains, and highways
      • Workforce availability and education
      • Cost of land, real estate, taxes
      • Building availability Financial incentives
    • Review space requirements (i.e. amount and type of space).
    • Identify potential locations and analyze with defined criteria.
    • Develop cost models for various alternatives.
    • Narrow selection to 2-3 sites. Analyze for fit and costs.
    • Conduct site visits to evaluate each option.
    • Make a choice and arrange for securing the site.
    • Remember to compare the cost to retrofit existing space with the cost of creating a space for the consolidated service desk.

    Key Decision

    Relocating to a new location involved potentially higher implementation costs, which was a significant disadvantage.

    Ultimately, the relocation reinforced the national mandate of the consolidated service desk. The new organization would act as a single point of contact for the support of all 42,000 members of the US Coast Guard.

    "Before our regional desks tended to take on different flavors and processes. Today, users get the same experience whether they’re in Alaska or Maryland by calling one number: (855) CG-FIX IT." – Rear Adm. Robert E. Day, Jr. (retired)

    Plan the logistics of the consolidation to inform the project roadmap and cost assessment

    Before proceeding, validate that the target state is achievable by evaluating the logistics of the consolidation itself.

    A detailed project roadmap will help break down the project into manageable tasks to reach the target state, but there is no value to this if the target state is not achievable or realistic.

    Don’t forget to assess the logistics of the consolidation that can be overlooked during the planning phase:

    • Service desk size
    • Location of the service desk
    • Proximity to company management and facilities
    • Unique applications, platforms, or configurations in each location/region
    • Distribution of end-user population and varying end-user needs
    • Load balancing
    • Call routing across locations
    • Special ergonomic or accessibility requirements by location
    • Language requirements

    Info-Tech Insight

    Language barriers can form significant hurdles or even roadblocks for the consolidation project. Don’t overlook the importance of unique language requirements and ensure the consolidated service desk will be able to support end-user needs.

    Plan logistics for process, technology, and facilities

    2.2.1 Assess logistical and cost considerations around processes, technology, and facilities

    Participants
    • CIO or IT Director
    • Project Manager
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    What You'll Need
    • Whiteboard or flip chart and markers
    • Consolidate roadmap
    Document

    Identify tasks that should form part of the roadmap and document in the roadmap tool.

    Identify costs that should be included in the TCO assessment and document in the TCO tool.

    Discuss and identify any logistic and cost considerations that will need to form part of the consolidation plan and roadmap. Examples are highlighted below.

    Logistic considerations

    • Impact of ticket intake process changes on end users
    • Process change impact on SLAs and productivity standards
    • Call routing changes and improvements
    • Workstations and workspace – is there enough and what will it look like for each agent?
    • Physical access to the service desk – will walk-ups be permitted? Is it accessible?
    • Security or authorization requirements for specific agents that may be impacted by relocation
    • Layout and design of new location, if applicable
    • Hardware, platform, network, and server implications
    • Licensing and contract limitations of the service desk tool

    Cost considerations

    • Cost savings from ITSM tool consolidation
    • Cost of new ITSM tool purchase, if applicable
    • Efficiencies gained from process simplification
    • New hardware or software purchases
    • Cost per square foot of new physical location, if applicable

    Develop a staffing plan that leverages the strengths you currently have and supplement where your needs require

    Your staff are your greatest assets; be sensitive to their concerns as you plan the consolidation.

    Keep in mind that if your target state involves reorganization of resources and the creation of resources, there will be additional staffing tasks that should form part of the consolidation plan. These include:

    • Develop job descriptions and reporting relationships
    • Evaluate current competencies Identify training and hiring needs
    • Develop migration strategy (including severance and migration packages)

    If new positions will be created, follow these steps to mitigate risks:

    1. Conduct skills assessments (a skills inventory should have been completed in phase 1)
    2. Re-interview existing staff for open positions before considering hiring outside staff
    3. Hire staff from outside if necessary

    For more guidance on hiring help desk staff, see Info-Tech’s blueprint, Manage Help Desk Staffing.

    Be sensitive to employee concerns.

    Develop guiding principles for the consolidation to ensure that employee satisfaction remains a priority throughout the consolidation.

    Examples include:

    1. Reconcile existing silos and avoid creating new silos
    2. Keep current systems where it makes sense to avoid staff having to learn multiple new systems to do their jobs and to reduce costs
    3. Repurpose staff and allocate according to their knowledge and expertise as much as possible
    4. Remain open and transparent about all changes and communicate change regularly

    Info-Tech Insight

    The most talented employees can be lost in the migration to a consolidated service desk, resulting in organizational loss of core knowledge. Mitigate this risk using measurement strategies, competency modeling, and knowledge sharing to reduce ambiguity and discomfort of affected employees.

    Plan logistics around resource allocation

    2.2.2 Assess logistical and cost considerations around people

    Participants
    • CIO or IT Director
    • Project Manager
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    What You’ll Need
    • Whiteboard or flip chart and markers
    • Consolidate roadmap
    Document

    Identify tasks that should form part of the roadmap and document in the roadmap tool.

    Identify costs that should be included in the TCO assessment and document in the TCO tool.

    Discuss and identify any logistic and cost considerations surrounding resources and staffing that will need to form part of the consolidation plan and roadmap. Examples are highlighted below.

    Logistic considerations

    • Specialized training requirements for staff moving to new roles
    • Enablement of knowledge sharing across agents
    • Potential attrition of staff who do not wish to relocate or be reallocated
    • Relocation of staff – will staff have to move and will there be incentives for moving?
    • Skills requirements, recruitment needs, job descriptions, and postings for hiring

    Cost considerations

    • Existing and future salaries for employees
    • Potential attrition of employees
    • Retention costs and salary increases to keep employees
    • Hiring costs
    • Training needs and costs

    Assess impact on staffing with the Service Desk Efficiency Calculator

    How do organizations calculate the staffing implications of a service desk consolidation?

    The Service Desk Efficiency Calculator uses the ITIL Gross Staffing Model to think through the impact of consolidating service desk processes.

    To estimate the impact of the consolidation on staffing levels, estimate what will happen to three variables:

    • Ticket volume
    • Average call resolution
    • Spare capacity

    All things being equal, a reduction in ticket volume (through outsourcing or the implementation of self-serve options, for example), will reduce your staffing requirements (all things being equal). The same goes for a reduction in the average call resolution rate.

    Constraints:

    Spare capacity: Many organizations are motivated to consolidate service desks by potential reductions in staffing costs. However, this is only true if your service desk agents have spare capacity to take on the consolidated ticket volume. If they don’t, you will still need the same number of agents to do the work at the consolidated service desk.

    Agent capabilities: If your agents have specialised skills that you need to maintain the same level of service, you won’t be able to reduce staffing until agents are cross-trained.

    Review the results of the Service Desk Efficiency Calculator to refine the business case for the consolidation project

    2.2.3 Discuss the results of the efficiency calculator in the context of consolidation

    Participants
    • CIO or IT Director
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    What You’ll Need
    • Completed Service Desk Efficiency Calculator

    The third tab of the Service Desk Efficiency Calculator will quantify:

    • Service Desk Staffing: The impact of different ticket distribution on service desk staffing levels.
    • Service Desk Ticket Resolution Cost: The impact of different ticket distributions on ticket resolution costs.
    • Service Management Efficiency: The business impact of service management initiatives, specifically, the time lost or captured in service management processes relative to an average full-time employee equivalent.

    Facilitate a discussion around the results.

    Evaluate where you are now and where you hope to be. Focus on the efficiency gains expected from the outsourcing project. Review the expected gains in average resolution time, the expected impact on service desk ticket volume, and the associated productivity gains.

    Use this information to refine the business case and project plan for the consolidation, if needed.

    Assess consolidation costs and cost savings to refine the business case

    While cost savings should not be the primary driver of consolidation, they should be a key outcome of the project in order to deliver value.

    Typical cost savings for a service desk consolidation are highlighted below:

    People 10-20% savings (through resource pooling and reallocation)

    Process 5-10% savings (through process simplification and efficiencies gained)

    Technology 10-15% savings (through improved call routing and ITSM tool consolidation)

    Facilities 5-10% savings (through site selection and redesign)

    Cost savings should be balanced against the costs of the consolidation itself (including hiring for consolidation project managers or consultants, moving expenses, legal fees, etc.)

    Evaluate consolidation costs using the TCO Comparison Tool described in the next section.

    Analyze resourcing and budgeting to create a realistic TCO and evaluate the benefits of consolidation

    Use the TCO tool to assess the cost and cost savings of consolidation

    • The tool compares the cost of operating two service desks vs. one consolidated service desk, along with the cost of consolidation.
    • If your consolidation effort involves more than two facilities, then use multiple copies of the tool.
      • E.g. If you are consolidating four service desks (A, B, C, and D) into one service desk (X), then use two copies of the tool. We encourage you to book an analyst call to help you get the most out of this tool and process.

    Service Desk Consolidation TCO Comparison Tool

    Refine the business case and update the executive presentation

    Check in with executives and project sponsor before moving forward with the transition

    Since completing the executive visioning session in step 1.2, you should have completed the following activities:

    • Current state assessment
    • Detailed target state and metrics
    • Gap analysis between current and target state
    • Assessment of logistics and cost of consolidation

    The next step will be to develop a project roadmap to achieve the consolidation vision.

    Before doing this, check back in with the project sponsor and business executives to refine the business case, obtain necessary approvals, and secure buy-in.

    If necessary, add to the executive presentation you completed in step 1.2, copying results of the deliverables you have completed since:

    • Consolidate Service Desk Assessment Tool (current state assessment)
    • Consolidate Service Desk Scorecard Tool
    • Service Desk Consolidation TCO Comparison Tool

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    2.1.3 Brainstorm process requirements for consolidated service desk

    Identify process requirements and desired characteristics for the target consolidated service desk.

    2.1.9 Review the results of the scorecard to identify best practices

    Review the results of the Consolidate Service Desk Scorecard Tool to identify top performing service desks and glean best practices.

    Phase 3

    Plan the Transition

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 3: Plan the transition

    Proposed Time to Completion (in weeks): 2-4

    Step 3.1: Build project roadmap

    Discuss with an analyst:

    • Identify specific initiatives for the consolidation project and evaluate the risks and dependencies for each
    • Plot initiatives on a detailed project roadmap with assigned responsibilities

    Then complete these activities…

    • Break the consolidation project down into specific initiatives
    • Identify and document risks and dependencies
    • Plot your initiatives onto a detailed project roadmap
    • Select transition date for consolidation

    With these tools & templates:

    Service Desk Consolidation Roadmap

    Step 3.2: Communicate the change

    Discuss with an analyst:

    • Identify the goals of communication, then develop a communications plan with targeted messaging for each stakeholder group to achieve those goals
    • Brainstorm potential objections and questions as well as responses to each

    Then complete these activities…

    • Build the communications delivery plan
    • Brainstorm potential objections and questions and prepare responses
    • Complete the news bulletin to distribute to your end users

    With these tools & templates:

    Service Desk Consolidation Communications and Training Plan Template

    Service Desk Consolidation News Bulletin & FAQ Template

    Phase 3 Results:
    • A detailed project roadmap toward consolidation and a communications plan to ensure stakeholders are on board

    Step 3.1: Build the project roadmap

    Phase 3

    Plan the consolidation

    3.1 Build the project roadmap

    3.2 Communicate the change

    This step will walk you through the following activities:
    • 3.1.1 Break the consolidation project down into a series of specific initiatives
    • 3.1.2 Identify and document risks and dependencies
    • 3.1.3 Plot your initiatives onto a detailed project roadmap
    • 3.1.4 Select transition date based on business cycles
    This step involves the following participants:
    • CIO
    • IT Directors
    • Service Desk Managers
    • Consolidation Project Manager
    • Service Desk Technicians
    Step outcomes

    A detailed roadmap to migrate to a single, consolidated service desk, including:

    • A breakdown of specific tasks groups by people, process, and technology
    • Identified risks and dependencies for each task
    • A timeline for completion of each task and the overall consolidation
    • Assigned responsibility for task completion

    Failure to engage stakeholders led to the failure of a large healthcare organization’s consolidation

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Healthcare

    Source: Organizational insider

    A large US healthcare facilities organization implemented a service desk consolidation initiative in early 2013. Only 18 months later, they reluctantly decided to return to their previous service desk model.

    Why did this consolidation effort fail?

    1. Management failed to communicate the changes to service-level staff, leading to agent confusion and pushback. Initially, each desk became part of the other’s overflow queue with no mention of the consolidation effort. Next, the independent desks began to share a basic request queue. Finally, there was a complete virtual consolidation – which came as a shock to service agents.
    2. The processes and workflows of the original service desks were not integrated, requiring service agents to consult different processes and use different workflows when engaging with end users from different facilities, even though all calls were part of the same queue.
    3. Staff at the different service centers did not have a consistent level of expertise or technical ability, even though they all became part of the same queue. This led to a perceived drop in end-user satisfaction – end users were used to getting a certain level of service and were suddenly confronted with less experienced agents.

    Before Consolidation

    Two disparate service desks:

    • With distinct geographic locations.
    • Servicing several healthcare facilities in their respective regions.
    • With distinct staff, end users, processes, and workflows.

    After Consolidation

    One virtually-consolidated service desk servicing many facilities spread geographically over two distinct locations.

    The main feature of the new virtual service desk was a single, pooled ticket queue drawn from all the end users and facilities in the new geographic regions.

    Break the consolidation project down into a series of specific initiatives

    3.1.1 Create a list of specific tasks that will form the consolidation project

    Participants
    • CIO or IT Director
    • Project Manager
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    What You’ll Need
    • Whiteboard and markers
    • List of prioritized target state requirements
    • Consolidation roadmap
    Document

    Document the list of initiatives in the Service Desk Consolidation Roadmap.

    In order to translate your newly made decisions regarding the target state and logistical considerations into a successful consolidation strategy, create an exhaustive list of all the steps and sub-steps that will lead you from your current state to your target state.

    Use the next few steps to finish brainstorming the initiative list, identify risks and dependencies, and construct a detailed timeline populated with specific project steps.

    Instructions

    Start with the list you have been curating throughout the current and future state assessments. If you are completing this project as a workshop, add to the initiative list you have been developing on the whiteboard.

    Try to organize your initiatives into groups of related tasks. Begin arranging your initiatives into people, process, technology, or other categories.

    Whiteboard People Process Technology Other

    Evaluate the impact of potential risks and develop a backup plan for high risk initiatives

    A service desk consolidation has a high potential for risks. Have a backup plan prepared for when events don’t go as planned.

    • A consolidation project requires careful planning as it is high risk and not performed often.
    • Apply the same due diligence to the consolidation plan as you do in preparing your disaster recovery plan. Establish predetermined resolutions to realistic risks so that the team can think of solutions quickly during the consolidation.

    Potential Sources of Risk

    • Service desk tool or phone line downtime prevents ability to submit tickets
    • Unable to meet SLAs through the transition
    • Equipment failure or damage through the physical move
    • Lost data through tool migration
    • Lost knowledge from employee attrition
    Risk - degree of impact if activities do not go as planned High

    A – High Risk, Low Frequency

    Tasks that are rarely done and are high risk. Focus attention here with careful planning (e.g. consolidation)

    B – High Risk, High Frequency

    Tasks that are performed regularly and must be watched closely each time (e.g. security authorizations)

    C – Low Risk, Low Frequency

    Tasks that are performed regularly with limited impact or risk (e.g. server upgrades)

    D – Low Risk, High Frequency

    Tasks that are done all the time and are not risky (e.g. password resets)

    Low High
    Frequency - how often the activity has been performed

    Service desk consolidations fit in category A

    Identify risks for people, processes, tools, or data to ensure the project plan will include appropriate mitigations

    Each element of the consolidation has an inherent risk associated with it as the daily service flow is interrupted. Prepare in advance by anticipating these risks.

    The project manager, service desk managers, and subject matter experts (SMEs) of different areas, departments, or locations should identify risks for each of the processes, tools, resource groups (people), and any data exchanges and moves that will be part of the project or impacted by the project.

    Process - For each process, validate that workflows can remain intact throughout the consolidation project. If any gaps may occur in the process flows, develop a plan to be implemented in parallel with the consolidation to ensure service isn’t interrupted.

    Technology - For a tool consolidation, upgrade, or replacement, verify that there is a plan in place to ensure continuation of service delivery processes throughout the change.

    Make a plan for if and how data from the old tool(s) will be migrated to the new tool, and how the new tool will be installed and configured.

    People - For movement of staff, particularly with termination, identify any risks that may occur and involve your HR and legal departments to ensure all movement is compliant with larger processes within the organization.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Don’t overlook the little things. Sometimes the most minor-seeming components of the consolidation can cause the greatest difficulty. For example, don’t assume that the service desk phone number can simply roll over to a new location and support the call load of a combined service desk. Verify it.

    Identify and document risks and dependencies

    3.1.2 Risks, challenges, and dependencies exercise - Estimated Time: 60 minutes

    Participants
    • CIO or IT Director
    • Project Manager
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    • SMEs
    What You'll Need
    • Whiteboard and markers
    • List of initiatives identified in previous activities
    • Consolidation roadmap
    Document

    Use the outcome of this activity to complete your consolidation roadmap.

    Instructions
    • Document risks and challenges, as well as dependencies associated with the initiatives identified earlier, using a different color sticky note from your initiatives.
    • See example below.
    Combine Related Initiatives
    • Look for initiatives that are highly similar, dependent on each other, or occurring at the same time. Consolidate these initiatives into a single initiative with several sub-steps in order to better organize your roadmap and reduce redundancy.
    • Create hierarchies for dependent initiatives that could affect the scheduling of initiatives on a roadmap, and reorganize the whiteboard where necessary.
    Optional:
    • Use a scoring method to categorize risks. E.g.:
      • High: will stop or delay operations, radically increase cost, or significantly reduce consolidation benefits
      • Medium: would cause some delay, cost increase, or performance shortfall, but would not threaten project viability
      • Low: could impact the project to a limited extent, causing minor delays or cost increases
    • Develop contingency plans for high risks or adjust to avoid the problem entirely
    Implement new ISTM tool:
    • Need to transition from existing tools
    • Users must be trained
    • Data and open tickets must be migrated

    Plot your initiatives onto a detailed project roadmap

    3.1.3 Estimated Time: 45 minutes

    Participants
    • CIO or IT Director
    • Project Manager
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    Document

    Document your initiatives on tab 2 of the Service Desk Consolidation Roadmap or map it out on a whiteboard.

    Determine the sequence of initiatives, identify milestones, and assign dates.
    • The purpose of this exercise is to define a timeline and commit to initiatives to reach your goals.
    • Determine the order in which previously identified consolidation initiatives will be implemented, document previously identified risks and dependencies, assign ownership for each task, and assign dates for pilots and launch.

    Select transition date based on business cycles

    3.1.4

    Participants
    • CIO or IT Director
    • Project Manager
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    What You'll Need
    • Consolidation roadmap
    Document

    Adjust initiatives in the consolidation roadmap if necessary.

    The transition date will be used in communications in the next step.

    1. Review the initiatives in the roadmap and the resulting sunshine diagram on tab 3.
    2. Verify that the initiatives will be possible within the determined time frame and adjust if necessary.
    3. Based on the results of the roadmap, select a target transition date for the consolidation by determining:
      1. Whether there are dates when a major effort of this kind should not be scheduled.
      2. Whether there are merger and acquisition requirements that dictate a specific date for the service desk merger.
    4. Select multiple measurable checkpoints to alert the team that something is awry and mitigate risks.
    5. Verify that stakeholders are aware of the risks and the proposed steps necessary to mitigate them, and assign the necessary resources to them.
    6. Document or adjust the target transition date in the roadmap.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Consolidating service desks doesn’t have to be done in one shot, replacing all your help desks, tools, and moving staff all at the same time. You can take a phased approach to consolidating, moving one location, department, or tool at a time to ease the transition.

    Step 3.2: Communicate the change

    Phase 3

    Design consolidation

    3.1 Build the project roadmap

    3.2 Communicate the change

    This step will walk you through the following activities:
    • 3.2.1 Build the communications delivery plan
    • 3.2.2 Brainstorm potential objections and questions and prepare responses
    This step involves the following participants:
    • IT Director
    • Project Manager
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    • Service Desk Agents
    Step outcomes
    • A detailed communications plan with key messages, delivery timeline, and spokesperson responsibility for each key stakeholder audience
    • A set of agreed-upon responses to anticipated objections and questions to ensure consistent message delivery
    • A news bulletin and list of FAQs to distribute to end users to prepare them for the change

    Create your communication plan with everyone in mind, from the CIO to end users

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Higher Education

    Source: Oxford University, IT Services

    Oxford implemented extremely innovative initiatives as part of its robust communications plan.

    ITS ran a one-day ITSM “business simulation” for the CIO and direct reports, increasing executive buy-in.

    The business simulation was incredibly effective as a way of getting management buy-in – it really showed what we are driving at. It’s a way of making it real, bringing people on board. ” – John Ireland, Director of Customer Service

    Detailed use cases were envisioned referencing particular ITIL processes as the backbone of the process framework.

    The use cases were very helpful, they were used […] in getting a broad engagement from teams across our department and getting buy-in from the distributed IT staff who we work with across the wider University. ” – John Ireland, Director of Customer Service

    The Oxford ITS SDCP blog was accessible to everyone.

    • Oxford’s SDCP blog acted as a project touchstone not only to communicate updates quickly, but also to collect feedback, enable collaboration, and set a project tone.
    • An informal tone and accessible format facilitated the difficult cultural shifts required of the consolidation effort.

    We in the project team would love to hear your view on this project and service management in general, so please feel free to comment on this blog post, contact us using the project email address […] or, for further information visit the project SharePoint site […] ” – Oxford ITS SDCP blog post

    Plan for targeted and timely communications to all stakeholders

    Develop a plan to keep all affected stakeholders informed about the changes consolidation will bring, and more importantly, how they will affect them.

    All stakeholders must be kept informed of the project plan and status as the consolidation progresses.
    • Management requires frequent communication with the core project group to evaluate the success of the project in meeting its goals.
    • End users should be informed about changes that are happening and how these changes will affect them.

    A communications plan should address three elements:

    1. The audience and their communication needs
    2. The most effective means of communicating with this audience
    3. Who should deliver the message

    Goals of communication:

    1. Create awareness and understanding of the consolidation and what it means for each role, department, or user group
    2. Gain commitment to the change from all stakeholders
    3. Reduce and address any concerns about the consolidation and be transparent in responding to any questions
    4. Communicate potential risks and mitigation plan
    5. Set expectations for service levels throughout and after the consolidation

    Plan the method of delivery for your communications carefully

    Plan the message, test it with a small audience, then deliver to your employees and stakeholders in person to avoid message avoidance or confusion.

    Message Format

    Email and Newsletters

    Email and newsletters are convenient and can be transmitted to large audiences easily, but most users are inundated with email already and may not notice or read the message.

    • Use email to make large announcements or invite people to meetings but not as the sole medium of communication.

    Face-to-Face Communication

    Face-to-face communication helps to ensure that users are receiving and understanding a clear message, and allows them to voice their concerns and clarify any confusion or questions.

    • Use one-on-ones for key stakeholders and team meetings for groups.

    Internal Website/Drive

    Internal sites help sustain change by making knowledge available after the consolidation, but won’t be retained beforehand.

    • Use for storing policies, how-to-guides, and SOPs.
    Message Delivery
    1. Plan your message
      1. Emphasize what the audience really needs to know, that is, how the change will impact them.
    2. Test your message
      1. Run focus groups or test your communications with a small audience (2-3 people) first to get feedback and adjust messages before delivering them more broadly.
    3. Deliver and repeat your message
      1. “Tell them what you’re going to tell them, then tell them, then tell them what you told them.”
    4. Gather feedback and evaluate communications
      1. Evaluate the effectiveness of the communications (through surveys, focus groups, stakeholder interviews, or metrics) to ensure the message was delivered and received successfully and communication goals were met.

    Address the specific concerns of the business vs. employees

    Focus on alleviating concerns from both sides of the communication equation: the business units and employees.

    Business units:

    Be attentive to the concerns of business unit management about loss of power. Appease worries about the potential risk of reduced service quality and support responsiveness that may have been experienced in prior corporate consolidation efforts.

    Make the value of the consolidation clear, and involve business unit management in the organizational change process.

    Focus on producing a customer-focused consolidated service desk. It will assuage fears over the loss of control and influence. Business units may be relinquishing control of their service desk, but they should retain the same level of influence.

    Employees:

    Employees are often fearful of the impact of a consolidation on their jobs. These fears should be addressed and alleviated as soon as possible.

    Design a communication plan outlining the changes and the reasons motivating it.

    Put support programs in place for displaced and surviving employees.

    Motivate employees during the transition and increase employee involvement in the change.

    Educate and train employees who make the transition to the new structure and new job demands.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Know your audience. Be wary of using technical jargon or acronyms that may seem like common knowledge within your department but would not be part of the vocabulary of non-technical audiences. Ensure your communications are suitable for the audience. If you need to use jargon or acronyms, explain what you mean.

    Build the communications delivery plan

    3.2.1 Develop a plan to deliver targeted messages to key stakeholder groups

    Participants
    • CIO or IT Director
    • Project Manager
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    What You'll Need
    • Communications plan template
    • Whiteboard and markers
    Document

    Document your decisions in the communications plan template

    1. Define the goals of the communications in section 1 of the Service Desk Consolidation Communications and Training Plan Template.
    2. Determine when communication milestones/activities need to be delivered by completing the Communications Schedule in section 2.
    3. Determine the key stakeholder groups or audiences to whom you will need to deliver communications.
    4. Identify the content of the key messages that need to be delivered and select the most appropriate delivery method for each (i.e. email, team meeting, individual meetings). Designate who will be responsible for delivering the messages.
    5. Document a plan for gathering feedback and evaluating the effectiveness of the communications in section 5 (i.e. stakeholder interviews and surveys).

    Section 4 of the communications plan on objections and question handling will be completed in activity 3.2.2.

    Optional Activity

    If you completed the Stakeholder Engagement Workbook in step 1.1, you may also complete the Communications tab in that workbook to further develop your plan to engage stakeholders.

    Effectively manage the consolidation by implementing change management processes

    Implement change management processes to ensure that the consolidation runs smoothly with limited impact on IT infrastructure.

    Communicate and track changes: Identify and communicate changes to all stakeholders affected by the change to ensure they are aware of any downtime and can plan their own activities accordingly.

    Isolate testing: Test changes within a safe non-production environment to eliminate the risk of system outages that result from defects discovered during testing.

    Document back-out plans: Documented back-out/backup plans enable quick recovery in the event that the change fails.

    The image is a horizontal bar graph, titled Unplanned downtime due to change versus change management maturity. The graph shows that for a Change Management Maturity that is Informal, the % Experiencing Unplanned Downtime due to Failed Change is 41%; for Defined, it is 25%; and for Optimized, it is 19%.

    Organizations that have more mature and defined change management processes experience less unplanned downtime when implementing change across the organization.

    Sustain changes by adapting people, processes, and technologies to accept the transition

    Verify that people, process, and technologies are prepared for the consolidation before going live with the transition.

    What?

    1. Adapt people to the change

    • Add/change roles and responsibilities.
    • Move people to different roles/teams.
    • Change compensation and incentive structures to reinforce new goals, if applicable.

    2. Adapt processes to the change

    • Add/change supporting processes.
    • Eliminate or consolidate legacy processes.
    • Add/change standard operating procedures.

    3. Adapt technologies to the change

    • Add/change/update supporting technologies.
    • Eliminate or consolidate legacy technologies
    How? Work with HR on any changes involving job design, personnel changes, or compensation. Work with enterprise architects or business analysts to manage significant changes to processes that may impact the business and service levels.

    See Info-Tech’s Optimize the Change Management Processblueprint to use a disciplined change control process for technology changes.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Organizational change management (OCM) is widely recognized as a key component of project success, yet many organizations struggle to get adoption for new tools, policies, and procedures. Use Info-Tech’s blueprint on driving organizational change to develop a strategy and toolkit to achieve project success.

    Manage people by addressing their specific concerns based on their attitude toward change

    Avoid high turnover and resistance to change by engaging both the enthusiasts and the skeptics with targeted messaging.

    • Clearly articulate and strongly champion the changes that will result from the consolidation for those willing to adapt to the change.
    • Make change management practices integral to the entire project.
    • Provide training workshops on new processes, new goals or metrics, new technologies and tools, and teamwork as early as possible after consolidation.
    1. Enthusiasts - Empower them to stay motivated and promote the change
    2. Fence-Sitters/Indifferent - Continually motivate them by example but give them time to adapt to the change
    3. Skeptics - Engage them early and address their concerns and doubts to convert them to enthusiasts
    4. Saboteurs - Prevent them from spreading dissent and rumors, thus undermining the project, by counteracting negative claims early

    Leverage the Stakeholder Engagement Workbook from step 1.1 as well as Info-Tech’s blueprint on driving organizational change for more tactics on change management, particularly managing and engaging various personas.

    Prepare ahead of time for questions that various stakeholder groups may have

    Anticipate questions that will arise about the consolidation so you can prepare and distribute responses to frequently asked questions. Sample questions from various stakeholders are provided below.

    General
    1. Why is the organization moving to a consolidated service desk?
    2. Where is the consolidated service desk going to be located?
    3. Are all or only some service desks consolidating?
    4. When is the consolidation happening?
    5. What are the anticipated benefits of consolidation?

    Business

    1. What is the budget for the project?
    2. What are the anticipated cost savings and return on investment?
    3. When will the proposed savings be realized?
    4. Will there be job losses from the consolidation and when will these occur?
    5. Will the organization subsidize moving costs?

    Employees

    1. Will my job function be changing?
    2. Will my job location be changing?
    3. What will happen if I can’t relocate?
    4. Will my pay and benefits be the same?
    5. Will reporting relationships change?
    6. Will performance expectations and metrics change?

    End Users

    1. How do I get help with IT issues?
    2. How do I submit a ticket?
    3. How will I be notified of ticket status, outages?
    4. Where will the physical service desk be located?
    5. Will I be able to get help in my language?
    6. Will there be changes for levels of service?

    Brainstorm likely objections/questions to prepare responses

    3.2.2 Prepare responses to likely questions to ensure consistent messaging

    Participants
    • IT Director
    • Project Manager
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    • Service Desk Agents
    Document

    Document your questions and responses in section 4 of the communications plan template. This should be continually updated.

    1. Brainstorm anticipated objections and questions you may hear from various stakeholder groups: service desk employees, end users, and management or executives.
    2. For each objection or question, prepare a response that will be delivered to ensure consistent messaging. Use a table like the example below.
    Group Objection/Question Response
    Service desk staff I’m comfortable with the service desk tool we’ve been using here and won’t know how to use the new one. We carefully evaluated the new solution against our requirements and selected it as the one that will provide the best service to our users and be user friendly. We tested the solution through user-acceptance testing to ensure staff will be comfortable using it, and we will provide comprehensive training to all users of the tool before launching it.
    End user I’m used to going to my favorite technician for help. How will I get service now? We are initiating a single point of contact so that you will know exactly where to go to get help quickly and easily, so that we can more quickly escalate your issue to the appropriate technician, and so that we can resolve it and notify you as soon as possible. This will make our service more effective and efficient than you having to find one individual who may be tied up with other work or unavailable.

    Keep the following in mind when formulating your responses:

    • Lead with the benefits
    • Be transparent and honest
    • Avoid acronyms, jargon, and technical terms
    • Appeal to both emotion and reason
    • Be concise and straightforward
    • Don’t be afraid to be repetitive; people need repetition to remember the message
    • Use concrete facts and images wherever possible

    Complete the Service Desk Consolidation News Bulletin & FAQ Template to distribute to your end users

    Customize the template or use as a guide to develop your own

    The Service Desk Consolidation News Bulletin & FAQ Template is intended to be an example that you can follow or modify for your own organization. It provides a summary of how the consolidation project will change how end users interact with the service desk.

    1. What the change means to end users
    2. When they should contact the service desk (examples)
    3. How to contact the service desk (include all means of contact and ticket submission)
    4. Answers to questions they may have
    5. Links to more information

    The bulletin is targeted for mass distribution to end users. A similar letter may be developed for service desk staff, though face-to-face communication is recommended.

    Instructions:

    1. Use the template as a guide to develop your own FAQ news bulletin and adjust any sections or wording as you see fit.
    2. You may wish to develop separate letters for each location, referring more specifically to their location and where the new service desk will be located.
    3. Save the file as a PDF for print or email distribution at the time determined in your communications plan.

    Keeping people a priority throughout the project ensured success

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Higher Education

    Source: Oxford University, IT Services

    Oxford’s new consolidated service desk went live April 20, 2015.

    They moved from 3 distinct tools and 5 disparate help desks to a single service desk with one robust ITSM solution, all grounded by a unified set of processes and an integrated workflow.

    The success of this project hinged upon:

    • A bold vision, formulated early and in collaboration with all stakeholders.
    • Willingness to take time to understand the unique perspective of each role and help desk, then carefully studying existing processes and workflows to build upon what works.
    • Constant collaboration, communication, and the desire to listen to feedback from all interested parties.

    "We have had a few teething issues to deal with, but overall this has been a very smooth transition given the scale of it." – ICTF Trinity Term 2015 IT Services Report

    Beyond the initial consolidation.
    • Over the summer of 2015, ITS moved to full 24/7 support coverage.
    • Oxford’s ongoing proposition with regard to support services is to extend the new consolidated service desk beyond its current IT role:
      • Academic Admissions
      • Case Management
      • IT Purchasing
    • To gradually integrate those IT departments/colleges/faculties that remain independent at the present time.
    • Info-Tech can facilitate these goals in your organization with our research blueprint, Extend the Service Desk to Enterprise.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    3.1.1 Break the consolidation project down into a series of specific initiatives

    Create a list of specific tasks that will form the consolidation project on sticky notes and organize into people, process, technology, and other categories to inform the roadmap.

    3.2.2 Brainstorm likely objections/questions to prepare responses

    Brainstorm anticipated questions and objections that will arise from various stakeholder groups and prepare consistent responses to each.

    Related Info-Tech research

    Standardize the Service Desk - Provide timely and effective responses to user requests and resolutions of all incidents.

    Extend the Service Desk to the Enterprise - Position IT as an innovator.

    Build a Continual Improvement Plan for the Service Desk - Teach your old service desk new tricks.

    Adopt Lean IT to Streamline the Service Desk - Turn your service desk into a Lean, keen, value-creating machine.

    Vendor Landscape: Enterprise Service Desk Software - Move past tickets to proactive, integrated service.

    Vendor Landscape: Mid-Market Service Desk Software - Ensure the productivity of the help desk with the right platform.

    Build an ITSM Tool Implementation Plan - Nail your ITSM tool implementation from the outset.

    Drive Organizational Change from the PMO - Don’t let bad change happen to good projects.

    Research contributors and experts

    Stacey Keener - IT Manager for the Human Health and Performance Directorate, Johnson Space Center, NASA

    Umar Reed - Director of IT Support Services US Denton US LLP

    Maurice Pryce - IT Manager City of Roswell, Georgia

    Ian Goodhart - Senior Business Analyst Allegis Group

    Gerry Veugelaers - Service Delivery Manager New Zealand Defence Force

    Alisa Salley Rogers - Senior Service Desk Analyst HCA IT&S Central/West Texas Division

    Eddie Vidal - IS Service Desk Managers University of Miami

    John Conklin - Chief Information Officer Helen of Troy LP

    Russ Coles - Senior Manager, Computer Applications York Region District Schoolboard

    John Seddon - Principal Vanguard Consulting

    Ryan van Biljon - Director, Technical Services Samanage

    Rear Admiral Robert E. Day Jr. (ret.) - Chief Information Officer United States Coast Guard

    George Bartha - Manager of Information Technology Unifrax

    Peter Hubbard - IT Service Management Consultant Pink Elephant

    Andre Gaudreau - Manager of School Technology Operations York Region District School Board

    Craig Nekola - Manager, Information Technology Anoka County

    Bibliography and Further Reading

    Hoen, Jim. “The Single Point of Contact: Driving Support Process Improvements with a Consolidated IT Help-Desk Approach.” TechTeam Global Inc. September 2005.

    Hubbard, Peter. “Leading University embarks on IT transformation programme to deliver improved levels of service excellence.” Pink Elephant. http://pinkelephant.co.uk/about/case-studies/service-management-case-study/

    IBM Global Services. “Service Desk: Consolidation, Relocation, Status Quo.” IBM. June 2005.

    Keener, Stacey. “Help Desks: a Problem of Astronomical Proportions.” Government CIO Magazine. 1 February 2015.

    McKaughan, Jeff. “Efficiency Driver.” U.S. Coast Guard Forum Jul. 2013. Web. http://www.intergraphgovsolutions.com/documents/CoastGuardForumJuly2013.pdf

    Numara Footprints. “The Top 10 Reasons for Implementing a Consolidated Service Desk.” Numara Software.

    Roy, Gerry, and Frederieke Winkler Prins. “How to Improve Service Quality through Service Desk Consolidation.” BMC Software.

    Smith, Andrew. “The Consolidated Service Desk – An Achievable Goal?” The Service Desk Institute.

    Wolfe, Brandon. “Is it Time for IT Service Desk Consolidation?” Samanage. 4 August 2015.

    Develop and Deploy Security Policies

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}256|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.5/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $19,953 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 19 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Governance, Risk & Compliance
    • Parent Category Link: /governance-risk-compliance
    • Employees are not paying attention to policies. Awareness and understanding of what the security policy’s purpose is, how it benefits the organization, and the importance of compliance are overlooked when policies are distributed.
    • Informal, un-rationalized, ad hoc policies do not explicitly outline responsibilities, are rarely comprehensive, and are difficult to implement, revise, and maintain.
    • Data breaches are still on the rise and security policies are not shaping good employee behavior or security-conscious practices.
    • Adhering to security policies is rarely a priority to users as compliance often feels like an interference to daily workflow. For a lot of organizations, security policies are not having the desired effect.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Creating good policies is only half the solution. Having a great policy management lifecycle will keep your policies current, effective, and compliant.
    • Policies must be reasonable, auditable, enforceable, and measurable. If the policy items don’t meet these requirements, users can’t be expected to adhere to them. Focus on developing policies to be quantified and qualified for them to be relevant.

    Impact and Result

    • Save time and money using the templates provided to create your own customized security policies mapped to the Info-Tech framework, which incorporates multiple industry best-practice frameworks (NIST, ISO, SOC2SEC, CIS, PCI, HIPAA).

    Develop and Deploy Security Policies Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Develop and Deploy Security Policies Deck – A step-by-step guide to help you build, implement, and assess your security policy program.

    Our systematic approach will ensure that all identified areas of security have an associated policy.

  • Develop the security policy program.
  • Develop and implement the policy suite.
  • Communicate the security policy program.
  • Measure the security policy program.
    • Develop and Deploy Security Policies – Phases 1-4

    2. Security Policy Prioritization Tool – A structured tool to help your organization prioritize your policy suite to ensure that you are addressing the most important policies first.

    The Security Policy Prioritization Tool assesses the policy suite on policy importance, ease to implement, and ease to enforce. The output of this tool is your prioritized list of policies based on our policy framework.

    • Security Policy Prioritization Tool

    3. Security Policy Assessment Tool – A structured tool to assess the effectiveness of policies within your organization and determine recommended actions for remediation.

    The Security Policy Assessment Tool assesses the policy suite on policy coverage, communication, adherence, alignment, and overlap. The output of this tool is a checklist of remediation actions for each individual policy.

    • Security Policy Assessment Tool

    4. Security Policy Lifecycle Template – A customizable lifecycle template to manage your security policy initiatives.

    The Lifecycle Template includes sections on security vision, security mission, strategic security and policy objectives, policy design, roles and responsibilities for developing security policies, and organizational responsibilities.

    • Security Policy Lifecycle Template

    5. Policy Suite Templates – A best-of-breed templates suite mapped to the Info-Tech framework you can customize to reflect your organizational requirements and acquire approval.

    Use Info-Tech's security policy templates, which incorporate multiple industry best-practice frameworks (NIST, ISO, SOC2SEC, CIS, PCI, HIPAA), to ensure that your policies are clear, concise, and consistent.

    • Acceptable Use of Technology Policy Template
    • Application Security Policy Template
    • Asset Management Policy Template
    • Backup and Recovery Policy Template
    • Cloud Security Policy Template
    • Compliance and Audit Management Policy Template
    • Data Security Policy Template
    • Endpoint Security Policy Template
    • Human Resource Security Policy Template
    • Identity and Access Management Policy Template
    • Information Security Policy Template
    • Network and Communications Security Policy Template
    • Physical and Environmental Security Policy Template
    • Security Awareness and Training Policy Template
    • Security Incident Management Policy Template
    • Security Risk Management Policy Template
    • Security Threat Detection Policy Template
    • System Configuration and Change Management Policy Template
    • Vulnerability Management Policy Template

    6. Policy Communication Plan Template – A template to help you plan your approach for publishing and communicating your policy updates across the entire organization.

    This template helps you consider the budget time for communications, identify all stakeholders, and avoid scheduling communications in competition with one another.

    • Policy Communication Plan Template

    7. Security Awareness and Training Program Development Tool – A tool to help you identify initiatives to develop your security awareness and training program.

    Use this tool to first identify the initiatives that can grow your program, then as a roadmap tool for tracking progress of completion for those initiatives.

    • Security Awareness and Training Program Development Tool

    Infographic

    Workshop: Develop and Deploy Security Policies

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Define the Security Policy Program

    The Purpose

    Define the security policy development program.

    Formalize a governing security policy lifecycle.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understanding the current state of policies within your organization.

    Prioritizing list of security policies for your organization.

    Being able to defend policies written based on business requirements and overarching security needs.

    Leveraging an executive champion to help policy adoption across the organization.

    Formalizing the roles, responsibilities, and overall mission of the program.

    Activities

    1.1 Understand the current state of policies.

    1.2 Align your security policies to the Info-Tech framework for compliance.

    1.3 Understand the relationship between policies and other documents.

    1.4 Prioritize the development of security policies.

    1.5 Discuss strategies to leverage stakeholder support.

    1.6 Plan to communicate with all stakeholders.

    1.7 Develop the security policy lifecycle.

    Outputs

    Security Policy Prioritization Tool

    Security Policy Prioritization Tool

    Security Policy Lifecycle Template

    2 Develop the Security Policy Suite

    The Purpose

    Develop a comprehensive suite of security policies that are relevant to the needs of the organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Time, effort, and money saved by developing formally documented security policies with input from Info-Tech’s subject-matter experts.

    Activities

    2.1 Discuss the risks and drivers your organization faces that must be addressed by policies.

    2.2 Develop and customize security policies.

    2.3 Develop a plan to gather feedback from users.

    2.4 Discuss a plan to submit policies for approval.

    Outputs

    Understanding of the risks and drivers that will influence policy development.

    Up to 14 customized security policies (dependent on need and time).

    3 Implement Security Policy Program

    The Purpose

    Ensure policies and requirements are communicated with end users, along with steps to comply with the new security policies.

    Improve compliance and accountability with security policies.

    Plan for regular review and maintenance of the security policy program.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Streamlined communication of the policies to users.

    Improved end user compliance with policy guidelines and be better prepared for audits.

    Incorporate security policies into daily schedule, eliminating disturbances to productivity and efficiency.

    Activities

    3.1 Plan the communication strategy of new policies.

    3.2 Discuss myPolicies to automate management and implementation.

    3.3 Incorporate policies and processes into your security awareness and training program.

    3.4 Assess the effectiveness of security policies.

    3.5 Understand the need for regular review and update.

    Outputs

    Policy Communication Plan Template

    Understanding of how myPolicies can help policy management and implementation.

    Security Awareness and Training Program Development Tool

    Security Policy Assessment Tool

    Action plan to regularly review and update the policies.

    Further reading

    Develop and Deploy Security Policies

    Enhance your overall security posture with a defensible and prescriptive policy suite.

    Analyst Perspective

    A policy lifecycle can be the secret sauce to managing your policies.

    A policy for policy’s sake is useless if it isn’t being used to ensure proper processes are followed. A policy should exist for more than just checking a requirement box. Policies need to be quantified, qualified, and enforced for them to be relevant.

    Policies should be developed based on the use cases that enable the business to run securely and smoothly. Ensure they are aligned with the corporate culture. Rather than introducing hindrances to daily operations, policies should reflect security practices that support business goals and protection.

    No published framework is going to be a perfect fit for any organization, so take the time to compare business operations and culture with security requirements to determine which ones apply to keep your organization secure.

    Photo of Danny Hammond, Research Analyst, Security, Risk, Privacy & Compliance Practice, Info-Tech Research Group. Danny Hammond
    Research Analyst
    Security, Risk, Privacy & Compliance Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge
    • Security breaches are damaging and costly. Trying to prevent and respond to them without robust, enforceable policies makes a difficult situation even harder to handle.
    • Informal, un-rationalized, ad hoc policies are ineffective because they do not explicitly outline responsibilities and compliance requirements, and they are rarely comprehensive.
    • Without a strong lifecycle to keep policies up to date and easy to use, end users will ignore or work around poorly understood policies.
    • Time and money is wasted dealing with preventable security issues that should be pre-emptively addressed in a comprehensive corporate security policy program.
    Common Obstacles

    InfoSec leaders will struggle to craft the right set of policies without knowing what the organization actually needs, such as:

    • The security policies needed to safeguard infrastructure and resources.
    • The scope the security policies will cover within the organization.
    • The current compliance and regulatory obligations based on location and industry.
    InfoSec leaders must understand the business environment and end-user needs before they can select security policies that fit.
    Info-Tech’s Approach

    Info-Tech’s Develop and Deploy Security Policies takes a multi-faceted approach to the problem that incorporates foundational technical elements, compliance considerations, and supporting processes:

    • Assess what security policies currently exist within the organization and consider additional secure policies.
    • Develop a policy lifecycle that will define the needs, develop required documentation, and implement, communicate, and measure your policy program.
    • Draft a set of security policies mapped to the Info-Tech framework, which incorporates multiple industry best-practice frameworks (NIST, ISO, SOC2SEC, CIS, PCI, HIPAA).

    Info-Tech Insight

    Creating good policies is only half the solution. Having a great policy management lifecycle will keep your policies current, effective, and compliant.

    Your Challenge

    This research is designed to help organizations design a program to develop and deploy security policies

    • A security policy is a formal document that outlines the required behavior and security controls in place to protect corporate assets.
    • The development of policy documents is an ambitious task, but the real challenge comes with communication and enforcement.
    • A good security policy allows employees to know what is required of them and allows management to monitor and audit security practices against a standard policy.
    • Unless the policies are effectively communicated, enforced, and updated, employees won’t know what’s required of them and will not comply with essential standards, making the policies powerless.
    • Without a good policy lifecycle in place, it can be challenging to illustrate the key steps and decisions involved in creating and managing a policy.

    The problem with security policies

    29% Of IT workers say it's just too hard and time consuming to track and enforce.

    25% Of IT workers say they don’t enforce security policies universally.

    20% Of workers don’t follow company security policies all the time.

    (Source: Security Magazine, 2020)

    Common obstacles

    The problem with security policies isn’t development; rather, it’s the communication, enforcement, and maintenance of them.

    • Employees are not paying attention to policies. Awareness and understanding of what the security policy’s purpose is, how it benefits the organization, and the importance of compliance are overlooked when policies are distributed.
    • Informal, un-rationalized, ad hoc policies do not explicitly outline responsibilities, are rarely comprehensive, and are difficult to implement, revise, and maintain.
    • Date breaches are still on the rise and security policies are not shaping good employee behavior or security-conscious practices.
    • Adhering to security policies is rarely a priority to users as compliance often feels like an interference to daily workflow. For a lot of organizations, security policies are not having the desired effect.
    Bar chart of the 'Average cost of a data breach' in years '2019-20', '20-21', and '21-22'.
    (Source: IBM, 2022 Cost of a Data Breach; n=537)

    Reaching an all-time high, the cost of a data breach averaged US$4.35 million in 2022. This figure represents a 2.6% increase from last year, when the average cost of a breach was US$4.24 million. The average cost has climbed 12.7% since 2020.

    Info-Tech’s approach

    The right policy for the right audience. Generate a roadmap to guide the order of policy development based on organizational policy requirements and the target audience.

    Actions

    1. Develop policy lifecycle
    2. Identify compliance requirements
    3. Understand which policies need to be developed, maintained, or decommissioned
    I. Define Security Policy Program

    a) Security policy program lifecycle template

    b) Policy prioritization tool
    Clockwise cycle arrows at the centre of the table. II. Develop & Implement Policy Suite

    a) Policy template set

    Policies must be reasonable, auditable, enforceable, and measurable. Policy items that meet these requirements will have a higher level of adherence. Focus on efficiently creating policies using pre-developed templates that are mapped to multiple compliance frameworks.

    Actions

    1. Differentiate between policies, procedures, standards, and guidelines
    2. Draft policies from templates
    3. Review policies, including completeness
    4. Approve policies
    Gaining feedback on policy compliance is important for updates and adaptation, where necessary, as well as monitoring policy alignment to business objectives.

    Actions

    1. Enforce policies
    2. Measure policy effectiveness
    IV. Measure Policy Program

    a) Security policy tracking tool

    III. Communicate Policy Program

    a) Security policy awareness & training tool

    b) Policy communication plan template
    Awareness and training on security policies should be targeted and must be relevant to the employees’ jobs. Employees will be more attentive and willing to incorporate what they learn if they feel that awareness and training material was specifically designed to help them.

    Actions

    1. Identify any changes in the regulatory and compliance environment
    2. Include policy awareness in awareness and training programs
    3. Disseminate policies
    Build trust in your policy program by involving stakeholder participation through the entire policy lifecycle.

    Blueprint benefits

    IT/InfoSec Benefits

    • Reduces complexity within the policy creation process by using a single framework to align multiple compliance regimes.
    • Introduces a roadmap to clearly educate employees on the do’s and don’ts of IT usage within the organization.
    • Reduces costs and efforts related to managing IT security and other IT-related threats.

    Business Benefits

    • Identifies and develops security policies that are essential to your organization’s objectives.
    • Integrates security into corporate culture while maximizing compliance and effectiveness of security policies.
    • Reduces security policy compliance risk.

    Key deliverable:

    Security Policy Templates

    Templates for policies that can be used to map policy statements to multiple compliance frameworks.

    Sample of Security Policy Templates.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    Security Policy Prioritization Tool

    The Info-Tech Security Policy Prioritization Tool will help you determine which security policies to work on first.
    Sample of the Security Policy Prioritization Tool.
    Sample of the Security Policy Assessment Tool.

    Security Policy Assessment Tool

    Info-Tech's Security Policy Assessment Tool helps ensure that your policies provide adequate coverage for your organization's security requirements.

    Measure the value of this blueprint

    Phase

    Purpose

    Measured Value

    Define Security Policy Program Understand the value in formal security policies and determine which policies to prepare to update, eliminate, or add to your current suite. Time, value, and resources saved with guidance and templates:
    1 FTE*3 days*$80,000/year = $1,152
    Time, value, and resources saved using our recommendations and tools:
    1 FTE*2 days*$80,000/year = $768
    Develop and Implement the Policy Suite Select from an extensive policy template offering and customize the policies you need to optimize or add to your own policy program. Time, value, and resources saved using our templates:
    1 consultant*15 days*$150/hour = $21,600 (if starting from scratch)
    Communicate Security Policy Program Use Info-Tech’s methodology and best practices to ensure proper communication, training, and awareness. Time, value, and resources saved using our training and awareness resources:
    1 FTE*1.5 days*$80,000/year = $408
    Measure Security Policy Program Use Info-Tech’s custom toolkits for continuous tracking and review of your policy suite. Time, value, and resources saved by using our enforcement recommendations:
    2 FTEs*5 days*$160,000/year combined = $3,840
    Time, value, and resources saved by using our recommendations rather than an external consultant:
    1 consultant*5 days*$150/hour = $7,200

    After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve.

    Overall Impact

    9.5 /10

    Overall Average $ Saved

    $29,015

    Overall Average Days Saved

    25

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Guided Implementation

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is six to ten calls over the course of two to four months.

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    Phase 3

    Phase 4

    Call #1: Scope security policy requirements, objectives, and any specific challenges.

    Call #2: Review policy lifecycle; prioritize policy development.

    Call #3: Customize the policy templates.

    Call #4: Gather feedback on policies and get approval.

    Call #5: Communicate the security policy program.

    Call #6: Develop policy training and awareness programs.

    Call #7: Track policies and exceptions.

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889
    Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
    Define the security policy program
    Develop the security policy suite
    Develop the security policy suite
    Implement security policy program
    Finalize deliverables and next steps
    Activities

    1.1 Understand the current state of policies.

    1.2 Align your security policies to the Info-Tech framework for compliance.

    1.3 Understand the relationship between policies and other documents.

    1.4 Prioritize the development of security policies.

    1.5 Discuss strategies to leverage stakeholder support.

    1.6 Plan to communicate with all stakeholders.

    1.7 Develop the security policy lifecycle.

    2.1 Discuss the risks and drivers your organization faces that must be addressed by policies.

    2.2 Develop and customize security policies.

    2.1 Discuss the risks and drivers your organization faces that must be addressed by policies (continued).

    2.2 Develop and customize security policies (continued).

    2.3 Develop a plan to gather feedback from users.

    2.4 Discuss a plan to submit policies for approval.

    3.1 Plan the communication strategy for new policies.

    3.2 Discuss myPolicies to automate management and implementation.

    3.3 Incorporate policies into your security awareness and training program.

    3.4 Assess the effectiveness of policies.

    3.5 Understand the need for regular review and update.

    4.1 Review customized lifecycle and policy templates.

    4.2 Discuss the plan for policy roll out.

    4.3 Schedule follow-up Guided Implementation calls.

    Deliverables
    1. Security Policy Prioritization Tool
    2. Security Policy Lifecycle
    1. Security Policies (approx. 9)
    1. Security Policies (approx. 9)
    1. Policy Communication Plan
    2. Security Awareness and Training Program Development Tool
    3. Security Policy Assessment Tool
    1. All deliverables finalized

    Develop and Deploy Security Policies

    Phase 1

    Define the Security Policy Program

    Phase 1

    1.1 Understand the current state

    1.2 Align your security policies to the Info-Tech framework

    1.3 Document your policy hierarchy

    1.4 Prioritize development of security policies

    1.5 Leverage stakeholders

    1.6 Develop the policy lifecycle

    Phase 2

    2.1 Customize policy templates

    2.2 Gather feedback from users on policy feasibility

    2.3 Submit policies to upper management for approval

    Phase 3

    3.1 Understand the need for communicating policies

    3.2 Use myPolicies to automate the management of your security policies

    3.3 Design, build, and implement your communications plan

    3.4 Incorporate policies and processes into your training and awareness programs

    Phase 4

    4.1 Assess the state of security policies

    4.2 Identify triggers for regular policy review and update

    4.3 Develop an action plan to update policies

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Understand the current state of your organization’s security policies.
    • Align your security policies to the Info-Tech framework for compliance.
    • Prioritize the development of your security policies.
    • Leverage key stakeholders to champion the policy initiative.
    • Inform all relevant stakeholders of the upcoming policy program.
    • Develop the security policy lifecycle.

    1.1 Understand the current state of policies

    Scenario 1: You have existing policies

    1. Use the Security Policy Prioritization Tool to identify any gaps between the policies you already have and those recommended based on your changing business needs.
    2. As your organization undergoes changes, be sure to incorporate new requirements in the existing policies.
    3. Sometimes, you may have more specific procedures for a domain’s individual security aspects instead of high-level policies.
    4. Group current policies into the domains and use the policy templates to create overarching policies where there are none and improve upon existing high-level policies.

    Scenario 2: You are starting from scratch

    1. To get started on new policies, use the Security Policy Prioritization Tool to identify the policies Info-Tech recommends based on your business needs. See the full list of templates in the Appendix to ensure that all relevant topics are addressed.
    2. Whether you’re starting from scratch or have incomplete/ad hoc policies, use Info-Tech’s policy templates to formalize and standardize security requirements for end users.
    Info-Tech Insight

    Policies are living, evolving documents that require regular review and update, so even if you have policies already written, you’re not done with them.

    1.2 Align your security policies to the Info-Tech framework for compliance

    You have an opportunity to improve your employee alignment and satisfaction, improve organizational agility, and obtain high policy adherence. This is achieved by translating your corporate culture into a policy-based compliance culture.

    Align your security policies to the Info-Tech Security Framework by using Info-Tech’s policy templates.

    Info-Tech’s security framework uses a best-of-breed approach to leverage and align with most major security standards, including:
    • ISO 27001/27002
    • COBIT
    • Center for Internet Security (CIS) Critical Controls
    • NIST Cybersecurity Framework
    • NIST SP 800-53
    • NIST SP 800-171

    Info-Tech Security Framework

    Info-Tech Security Framework with policies grouped into categories which are then grouped into 'Governance' and 'Management'.

    1.3 Document your policy hierarchy

    Structuring policy components at different levels allows for efficient changes and direct communication depending on what information is needed.

    Policy hierarchy pyramid with 'Security Policy Lifecycle' on top, then 'Security Policies', then 'IT and/or Supporting Documentation'.

    Defines the cycle for the security policy program and what must be done but not how to do it. Aligns the business, security program, and policies.
    Addresses the “what,” “who,” “when,” and “where.”

    Defines high-level overarching concepts of security within the organization, including the scope, purpose, and objectives of policies.
    Addresses the high-level “what” and “why.”
    Changes when business objectives change.

    Defines enterprise/technology – specific, detailed guidelines on how to adhere to policies.
    Addresses the “how.”
    Changes when technology and processes change.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Design separate policies for different areas of focus. Policies that are written as single, monolithic documents are resistant to change. A hierarchical top-level document supported by subordinate policies and/or procedures can be more rapidly revised as circumstances change.

    1.3.1 Understand the relationship between policies and other documents

    Policy:
    • Provides emphasis and sets direction.
    • Standards, guidelines, and procedures must be developed to support an overarching policy.
    Arrows stemming from the above list, connecting to the three lists below.

    Standard:

    • Specifies uniform method of support for policy.
    • Compliance is mandatory.
    • Includes process, frameworks, methodologies, and technology.
    Two-way horizontal arrow.

    Procedure:

    • Step-by-step instructions to perform desired actions.
    Two-way horizontal arrow.

    Guideline:

    Recommended actions to consider in absence of an applicable standard, to support a policy.
    This model is adapted from a framework developed by CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor).

    Supporting Documentation

    Considerations for standards

    Standards. These support policies by being much more specific and outlining key steps or processes that are necessary to meet certain requirements within a policy document. Ideally standards should be based on policy statements with a target of detailing the requirements that show how the organization will implement developed policies.

    If policies describe what needs to happen, then standards explain how it will happen.

    A good example is an email policy that states that emails must be encrypted; this policy can be supported by a standard such as Transport Layer Security (TLS) encryption that specifically ensures that all email communication is encrypted for messages “in transit” from one secure email server that has TLS enabled to another.

    There are numerous security standards available that support security policies/programs based on the kind of systems and controls that an organization would like to put in place. A good selection of supporting standards can go a long way to further protect users, data, and other organizational assets
    Key Policies Example Associated Standards
    Access Control Policy
    • Password Management User Standard
    • Account Auditing Standard
    Data Security Policy
    • Cryptography Standard
    • Data Classification Standard
    • Data Handling Standard
    • Data Retention Standard
    Incident Response Policy
    • Incident Response Plan
    Network Security Policy
    • Wireless Connectivity Standard
    • Firewall Configuration Standard
    • Network Monitoring Standard
    Vendor Management Policy
    • Vendor Risk Management Standard
    • Third-Party Access Control Standard
    Application Security Policy
    • Application Security Standard

    1.4 Prioritize development of security policies

    The Info-Tech Security Policy Prioritization Tool will help you determine which security policies to work on first.
    • The tool allows you to prioritize your policies based on:
      • Importance: How relevant is this policy to organizational security?
      • Ease to implement: What is the effort, time, and resources required to write, review, approve, and distribute the policy?
      • Ease to enforce: How much effort, time, and resources are required to enforce the policy?
    • Additionally, the weighting or priority of each variable of prioritization can be adjusted.

    Align policies to recent security concerns. If your organization has recently experienced a breach, it may be crucial to highlight corresponding policies as immediately necessary.

    Info-Tech Insight

    If you have an existing policy that aligns with one of the Info-Tech recommended templates weight Ease to Implement and Ease to Enforce as HIGH (4-5). This will decrease the priority of these policies.

    Sample of the Security Policy Prioritization Tool.

    Download the Security Policy Prioritization Tool

    1.5 Leverage stakeholders to champion policies

    Info-Tech Insight

    While management support is essential to initiating a strong security posture, allow employees to provide input on the development of security policies. This cooperation will lead to easier incorporation of the policies into the daily routines of workers, with less resistance. The security team will be less of a police force and more of a partner.

    Executive champion

    Identify an executive champion who will ensure that the security program and the security policies are supported.

    Focus on risk and protection

    Security can be viewed as an interference, but the business is likely more responsive to the concepts of risk and protection because it can apply to overall business operations and a revenue-generating mandate.

    Communicate policy initiatives

    Inform stakeholders of the policy initiative as security policies are only effective if they support the business requirements and user input is crucial for developing a strong security culture.

    Current security landscape

    Leveraging the current security landscape can be a useful mechanism to drive policy buy-in from stakeholders.

    Management buy-in

    This is key to policy acceptance; it indicates that policies are accurate, align with the business, and are to be upheld, that funds will be made available, and that all employees will be equally accountable.

    Voka 2025 Resilience Scores

     

    Test uw digitale slagkracht!

    Jammer! U bent te laat.

    De VOKA Bedrijven Contact Dagen 2025 zijn voorbij en onze winnaars zijn bekend!

    Liguris: 80 points
    Keiretsu: 71 points
    Staffler: 69 points
    Xpo group: 67 points
    Actief: 66 points

    Continue reading

    Build a Zero Trust Roadmap

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}253|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.3/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $48,932 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 42 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Security Strategy & Budgeting
    • Parent Category Link: /security-strategy-and-budgeting
    • Many IT and security leaders struggle to understand zero trust and how best to deploy it with their existing IT resources.
    • The need to move from a perimeter-based approach to security toward an “Always Verify” approach is clear. The path to getting there is complex and expensive.
    • Zero trust as a principle is a moving target due to competing definitions and standards. A strategy that adapts evolving best practices must be supported by business stakeholders.
    • Full zero trust includes many components. Performing an accurate assessment of readiness and benefits to adopt zero trust can be extremely difficult when you don’t know where to start.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Apply zero trust to key protect surfaces. A successful zero trust strategy should evolve through an iterative and repeatable process by assessing the full spectrum of available technologies to apply zero trust principles to the most relevant protect surfaces.

    Impact and Result

    Every organization should have a zero trust strategy and the roadmap to deploy it must always be tested and refined. Our unique approach:

    • Assess resources and determine zero trust readiness.
    • Prioritize initiatives and build out roadmap.
    • Deploy zero trust and monitor with zero trust progress metrics.

    Build a Zero Trust Roadmap Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Build a Zero Trust Roadmap Deck – The purpose of the storyboard is to provide a detailed description of the steps involving in building a roadmap for implementing zero trust.

    The storyboard contains five easy-to-follow steps on building a roadmap for implementing zero trust, from aligning initiatives to business goals to establishing metrics for measuring the progress and effectiveness of a zero trust implementation.

    • Build a Zero Trust Roadmap – Phases 1-5

    2. Zero Trust Protect Surface Mapping Tool – A tool to identify key protect surfaces and map them to business goals.

    Use this tool to develop your zero trust strategy by having it focus on key protect surfaces that are aligned to the goals of the business.

    • Zero Trust Protect Surface Mapping Tool

    3. Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool – A tool to perform a gap analysis between the organization's current implementation of zero trust controls and its desired target state and to build a roadmap to achieve the target state.

    Use this tool to develop your zero trust strategy by creating a roadmap that is aligned with the current state of the organization when it comes to zero trust and its desired target state.

    • Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool

    4. Zero Trust Candidate Solutions Selection Tool – A tool to identify and evaluate solutions for identified zero trust initiatives.

    Use this tool to develop your zero trust strategy by identifying the best solutions for zero trust initiatives.

    • Zero Trust Candidate Solutions Selection Tool

    5. Zero Trust Progress Monitoring Tool – A tool to identify metrics to measure the progress and efficiency of the zero trust implementation.

    Use this tool to develop your zero trust strategy by identifying metrics that will allow the organization to monitor how the zero trust implementation is progressing, and whether it is proving to be effective.

    • Zero Trust Progress Monitoring Tool

    6. Zero Trust Communication Deck – A template to present the zero trust template to key stakeholders.

    Use this template to present the zero trust strategy and roadmap to ensure all key elements are captured.

    • Zero Trust Communication Deck

    Infographic

    Workshop: Build a Zero Trust Roadmap

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Define Business Goals and Protect Surfaces

    The Purpose

    Align business goals to protect surfaces.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A better understanding of how business goals can map to key protect surfaces and their associated DAAS elements.

    Activities

    1.1 Understand business and IT strategy and plans.

    1.2 Define business goals.

    1.3 Identify five critical protect surfaces and their associated DAAS elements.

    1.4 Map business goals and protect surfaces.

    Outputs

    Mapping of business goals to key protect surfaces and their associated DAAS elements.

    2 Begin Gap Analysis

    The Purpose

    Identify and define zero trust initiatives.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A list of zero trust initiatives to be prioritized and set into a roadmap.

    Activities

    2.1 Assess current security capabilities and define the zero trust target state for a set of controls.

    2.2 Identify tasks to close maturity gaps.

    2.3 Assign tasks to zero trust initiatives.

    Outputs

    Security capabilities current state assessment

    Zero trust target state

    Tasks to address maturity gaps

    3 Complete Gap Analysis

    The Purpose

    Complete the zero trust gap analysis and prioritize zero trust initiatives.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A prioritized list of zero trust initiatives aligned to business goals and key protect surfaces.

    Activities

    3.1 Align initiatives to business goals and key protect surfaces.

    3.2 Conduct cost/benefit analysis on zero trust initiatives.

    3.3 Prioritize initiatives.

    Outputs

    Zero trust initiative list mapped to business goals and key protect surfaces

    Prioritization of zero trust initiatives

    4 Finalize Roadmap and Formulate Policies

    The Purpose

    Finalize the zero trust roadmap and begin to formulate zero trust policies for roadmap initiatives.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A zero trust roadmap of prioritized initiatives.

    Activities

    4.1 Define solution criteria.

    4.2 Identify candidate solutions.

    4.3 Evaluate candidate solutions.

    4.4 Finalize roadmap.

    4.5 Formulate policies for critical DAAS elements.

    4.6 Establish metrics for high-priority initiatives.

    Outputs

    Zero trust roadmap

    Zero trust policies for critical protect surfaces

    Method for defining zero trust policies for candidate solutions

    Metrics for high-priority initiatives

    Further reading

    Build a Zero Trust Roadmap

    Leverage an iterative and repeatable process to apply zero trust to your organization.

    EXECUTIVE BRIEF

    Analyst Perspective

    Internet is the new corporate network.

    For the longest time we have focused on reducing the attack surface to deter malicious actors from attacking organizations, but I dare say that has made these actors scream “challenge accepted.” With sophisticated tools, time, and money in their hands, they have embarrassed even the finest of organizations. A popular hybrid workforce and rapid cloud adoption have introduced more challenges for organizations, as the security and network perimeter have shifted and the internet is now the corporate network. Suffice it to say that a new mindset needs to be adopted to stay on top of the game.

    The success of most attacks is tied to denial of service, data exfiltration, and ransom. A shift from focusing on the attack surface to the protect surface will help organizations implement an inside-out architecture that protects critical infrastructure, prevents the success of any attack, makes it difficult to gain access, and links directly to business goals.

    Zero trust principles aid that shift across several pillars (Identity, Device, Application, Network, and Data) that make up a typical infrastructure; hence, the need for a zero trust roadmap to accomplish that which we desire for our organization.

    Victor Okorie
    Senior Research Analyst, Security and Privacy
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    • Many IT and security leaders struggle to understand zero trust and how best to deploy it with their existing IT resources.
    • The need to move from a perimeter-based approach to security toward an “Always Verify” approach is clear. The path to getting there is complex and expensive.

    Common Obstacles

    • Zero trust as a principle is a moving target due to competing definitions and standards. A strategy that adapts evolving best practices must be supported by business stakeholders.
    • Full zero trust includes many components. Performing an accurate assessment of readiness and benefits to adopt zero trust can be extremely difficult when you don’t know where to start.

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    • Every organization should have a zero trust strategy and the roadmap to deploy it must always be tested and refined.
    • Our unique approach:
      • Assess resources and determine zero trust readiness.
      • Address barriers and identify enablers.
      • Prioritize initiatives and build out roadmap.
      • Identify most appropriate vendors via vendor selection framework.
      • Deploy zero trust and monitor with zero trust progress metrics.

    Info-Tech Insight

    A successful zero trust strategy should evolve through an iterative and repeatable process by assessing the full spectrum of available technologies to apply zero trust principles to the most relevant protect surfaces.

    Your challenge

    This research is designed to help organizations:

    • Understand what zero trust is and decide how best to deploy it with their existing IT resources. Zero trust is a set of principles that defaults to the highest level of security; a failed implementation can easily disrupt the business. A pragmatic zero trust implementation must be flexible and adaptable yet maintain a consistent level of protection.
    • Move from a perimeter-based approach to security toward an “Always Verify” approach. The path to getting there is complex without a clear understanding of desired outcomes. Focusing efforts on key protection gaps and leveraging capable controls in existing architecture allows for a repeatable process that carries IT, security, and the business along on the journey.

    On this zero trust journey, identify your valuable assets and zero trust controls to protect them.

    Top three reasons for building a zero trust strategy

    44%

    Reduce attacker’s ability to move laterally

    44%

    Enforce least privilege access to critical resources

    41%

    Reduce enterprise attack surface

    Common obstacles

    These barriers make this challenge difficult to address for many organizations:

    • Due to zero trust’s many components, performing an accurate assessment of readiness and benefits to adopt zero trust can be extremely difficult when you don’t know where to start.
      • To feel ready to implement and to understand the benefits of zero trust, IT must first understand what zero trust means to the organization.
    • Zero trust as a set of principles is a moving target, with many developing standards and competing technology definitions. A strategy built around evolving best practices must be supported by related business stakeholders.
      • To ensure support, IT must be able to “sell” zero trust to business stakeholders by illustrating the value zero trust can bring to business objectives.

    43%

    Organizations with a full implementation of zero trust saved 43% on the costs of data breaches.
    (Source: Teramind, 2021)

    96%

    Zero trust is considered key to the success of 96% of organizations in a survey conducted by Microsoft.
    (Source: Microsoft, 2021)

    What is zero trust?

    It depends on who you ask…

    • Vendors use zero trust as a marketing buzzword.
    • Organizations try to comprehend zero trust in their own limited views.
    • Zero trust regulations/standards are still developing.

    “A cybersecurity paradigm focused on resource protection and the premise that trust is never granted implicitly but must be continually evaluated.”

    Source: NIST, SP 800-207: Zero Trust Architecture, 2020

    “An evolving set of cybersecurity paradigms that move defenses from static, network-based perimeters to focus on users, assets, and resources.”

    Source: DOD, Zero Trust Reference Architecture, 2021

    “A security model, a set of system design principles, and a coordinated cybersecurity and system management strategy based on an acknowledgement that threats exist both inside and outside traditional network boundaries.”

    Source: NSA, Embracing a Zero Trust Security Model, 2021

    “Zero trust provides a collection of concepts and ideas designed to minimize uncertainty in enforcing accurate, least privilege per-request access decisions in information systems and services in the face of a network viewed as compromised.”

    Source: CISA, Zero Trust Maturity Model, 2021

    “The foundational tenet of the zero trust model is that no actor, system, network, or service operating outside or within the security perimeter is trusted.”

    Source: OMB, Moving the U.S. Government Toward Zero Trust Cybersecurity Principles, 2022

    What is zero trust?

    From Theoretical to Practical

    Zero trust is an ideal in the literal sense of the word, because it is a standard defined by its perfection. Just as nothing in life is perfect, there is no measure that determines an organization is absolutely zero trust. The best organizations can do is improve their security iteratively and get as close to ideal as possible.

    In the most current application of zero trust in the enterprise, a zero trust strategy applies a set of principles, including least-privilege access and per-request access enforcement, to minimize compromise to critical assets. A zero trust roadmap is a plan that leverages zero trust concepts, considers relationships between technical elements as well as security solutions, and applies consistent access policies to minimize areas of exposure.

    Zero Trust; Identity; Workloads & Applications; Network; Devices; Data

    Info-Tech Insight

    Solutions offering zero trust often align with one of five pillars. A successful zero trust implementation may involve a combination of solutions, each protecting the various data, application, assets, and/or services elements in the protect surface.

    Zero trust business benefits

    Reduce business and organizational risk

    Reduced business risks as continuous verification of identity, devices, network, applications, and data is embedded in the organizations practice.

    36% of data breaches involved internal actors.
    Source: Verizon, 2021

    Reduce CapEx and OpEx

    Reduced CapEx and OpEx due to the scalability, low staffing requirement, and improved time-to-respond to threats.
    Source: SecurityBrief - Australia, 2020.

    Reduce scope and cost of compliance

    Helps achieve compliance with several privacy standards and regulations, improves maturity for cyber insurance premium, and fewer gaps during audits.

    Scope of compliance reduced due to segmentation.

    Reduce risk of data breach

    Reduced risk of data breach in any instance of a malicious attack as there’s no lateral movement, secure segment, and improved visibility.

    10% Increase in data breach costs; costs went from $3.86 million to $4.24 million.
    Source: IBM, 2021

    This is an image of a thought map detailing Info-Tech's Build A Zero Trust Roadmap.  The main headings are: Define; Design; Develop; Monitor

    Info-Tech’s methodology for Building a Zero Trust Roadmap

    1. Define Business Goals and Protect Surfaces

    2. Assess Key Capabilities and Identify Zero Trust Initiatives

    3. Evaluate Candidate Solutions and Finalize Roadmap

    4. Formulate Policies for Roadmap Initiatives

    5. Monitor the Zero Trust Roadmap Deployment

    Phase Steps

    Define business goals

    Identify critical DAAS elements

    Map business goals to critical DAAS elements

    1. Review the Info-Tech framework
    2. Assess current capabilities and define the zero trust target state
    3. Identify tasks to close gaps
    4. Define tasks and initiatives
    5. Align initiatives to business goals and protect surfaces
    1. Define solution criteria
    2. Identify candidate solutions
    3. Evaluate candidate solutions
    4. Perform cost/benefit analysis
    5. Prioritize initiatives
    6. Finalize roadmap
    1. Formulate policies for critical DAAS elements
    2. Formulate policies to secure a path to access critical DAAS elements
    1. Establish metrics for roadmap tasks
    2. Track and report metrics
    3. Build a communication deck

    Phase Outcomes

    Mapping of business goals to protect surfaces

    Gap analysis of security capabilities

    Evaluation of candidate solutions and a roadmap to close gaps

    Method for defining zero trust policies for candidate solutions

    Metrics for measuring the progress and efficiency of the zero trust implementation

    Protect what is relevant

    Apply zero trust to key protect surfaces

    A successful zero trust strategy should evolve through an iterative and repeatable process by assessing the full spectrum of available technologies to apply zero trust principles to the most relevant protect surfaces.

    Align protect surfaces to business objectives

    Developing a zero trust roadmap collaboratively with business stakeholders enables alignment with upcoming business priorities and industry trends.

    Identify zero trust capabilities

    Deriving protect surface elements from business goals reframes how security controls are applied. Assess control effectiveness in this context and identify zero trust capabilities to close any gaps.

    Roadmap first, not solution first

    Don’t let your solution dictate your roadmap. Define your zero trust solution criteria before engaging in vendor selection.

    Create enforceable policies

    The success of a zero trust implementation relies on consistent enforcement. Applying the Kipling methodology to each protect surface is the best way to design zero trust policies.

    Success should benefit the organization

    To measure the efficacy of a zero trust implementation, ensure you know what a successful zero trust implementation means for your organization, and define metrics that demonstrate whether that success is being realized.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    Key deliverable:

    Zero Trust Communication Deck

    Present your zero trust strategy in a prepopulated document that summarizes the work you have completed as a part of this blueprint.

    Zero Trust Protect Surface Mapping Tool

    Identify critical and vulnerable DAAS elements to protect and align them to business goals.

    Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool

    Perform a gap analysis between current and target states to build a zero trust roadmap.

    Zero Trust Candidate Solutions Selection Tool

    Determine and evaluate candidate solutions based on defined criteria.

    Zero Trust Progress Monitoring Tool

    Develop metrics to track the progress and efficiency of the organization’s zero trust implementation.

    Blueprint benefits

    IT Benefits

    • A mapped transaction flow of critical and vulnerable assets and visibility of where to implement security controls that aligns with the principle of zero trust.
    • Improved security posture across the digital attack surface while focusing on the protect surface.
    • An inside-out architecture that leverages current existing architecture to tighten security controls, is automated, and gives granular visibility.

    Business Benefits

    • Reduced business risks as continuous verification of identity, devices, network, applications, and data is embedded in the organization’s practice.
    • Reduced CapEx and OpEx due to the scalability, low staffing requirement, and improved time-to-respond to threats.
    • Helps achieve compliance with several privacy standards and regulations, improves maturity for cyber insurance premium, and fewer gaps during audits.
    • Reduced risk of data breach in any instance of a malicious attack.

    Measure the value of this blueprint

    Save an average of $1.76 million dollars in the event of a data breach

    • This research set seeks to help organizations develop a mature zero trust implementation which, according to IBM’s “Cost of a Data Breach 2021 Report,” saves organizations an average of $1.76 million in the event of a data breach.
    • Leverage phase 5 of this research to develop metrics to track the implementation progress and efficacy of zero trust tasks.

    43%

    Organizations with a mature implementation of zero trust saved 43%, or $1.76 million, on the costs of data breaches.
    Source: IBM, 2021

    In phase 2 of this blueprint, we will help you establish zero trust implementation tasks for your organization.

    In phase 3, we will help you develop a game plan and a roadmap for implementing those tasks.

    This image contains a screenshot info-tech's methodology for building a zero-trust roadmap, discussed earlier in this blueprint

    Executive Brief Case Study

    National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)

    INDUSTRY: Government

    SOURCE: Zero Trust Architecture Technical Exchange Meeting

    NASA recognized the potential benefits of both adopting a zero trust architecture (including aligning with OMB FISMA and DHS CDM DEFEND) and improving NASA systems, especially those related to user experience with dynamic access, application security with sole access from proxy, and risk-based asset management with trust score. The trust score is continually evaluated from a combination of static factors, such as credential and biometrics, and dynamic factors, such as location and behavior analytics, to determine the level of access. The enhanced access mechanism is projected on use-case flows of users and external partners to analyze the required initiatives.

    The lessons learned in adapting zero trust were:

    • Focus on access to data, assets, applications, and services; and don’t select solutions or vendors too early.
    • Provide support for mobile and external partners.
    • Complete zero trust infrastructure and services design with holistic risk-based management, including network access control with software-defined networking and an identity management program.
    • Develop a zero trust strategy that aligns with mission objectives.

    Results

    NASA implemented zero trust architecture by leveraging the agency existing components on a roadmap with phases related to maturity. The initial development includes privileged access management, security user behavior analytics, and a proof-of-concept lab for evaluating the technologies.
    Case Study Source: NASA, “Planning for a Zero Trust Architecture Target State,” 2019

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    “Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

    Workshop

    “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

    Consulting

    “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5
    Call #1:
    Scope requirements, objectives, and your specific challenges.

    Call #3:
    Define current security capabilities and zero trust target state.

    Call #5:

    Identify and evaluate solution criteria.

    Call #7:
    Create a process for formulating zero trust policies.

    Call #8:
    Establish metrics for assessing the implementation and effectiveness of zero trust.

    Call #2:
    Identify business goals and protect surfaces.

    Call #4:
    Identify gap-closing tasks and assign to zero trust initiatives.

    Call #6:
    Prioritize zero trust initiatives.

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.
    A typical GI is between 8 to 12 calls over the course of 2 to 4 months.

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5

    Define Business Goals and Protect Surfaces

    Begin Gap Analysis

    Complete Gap Analysis

    Finalize Roadmap and Formulate Policies

    Next Steps and
    Wrap-Up (offsite)

    Activities

    1.1 Understand business and IT strategy and plans.

    1.2 Define business goals.

    1.3 Identify five critical protect surfaces and their associated DAAS elements.

    1.4 Map business goals and protect surfaces.

    2.1 Assess current security capabilities and define the zero Trust target state for a set of controls.

    2.2 Identify tasks to close maturity gaps.

    2.3 Assign tasks to zero trust initiatives.

    3.1 Align initiatives to business goals and key protect surfaces.

    3.2 Conduct cost/benefit analysis on zero trust initiatives.

    3.3 Prioritize initiatives.

    4.1 Define solution criteria.

    4.2 Identify candidate solutions.

    4.3 Evaluate candidate solutions.

    4.4 Finalize roadmap.

    4.5 Formulate policies for critical DAAS elements.

    4.6 Establish metrics for high-priority initiatives.

    5.1 Complete in-progress deliverables from previous four days.

    5.2 Set up review time for workshop deliverables and to discuss next steps.

    Deliverables
    1. 1.Mapping of business goals to key protect surfaces and their associated DAAS elements
    1. Security capabilities current state assessment
    2. Zero trust target state
    3. Tasks to address maturity gaps
    1. Zero trust initiative list mapped to business goals and key protect surfaces
    2. Prioritization of zero trust initiatives
    1. Zero trust roadmap
    2. Zero trust policies for critical protect surfaces
    3. Method for defining zero trust policies for candidate solutions
    4. Metrics for high-priority initiatives
    1. Zero trust roadmap documentation
    2. Mapping of Info-Tech resources against individual initiatives

    Phase 1

    Define Business Objectives and Protect Surfaces

    Build a Zero Trust Roadmap

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify and define the business goals.
    • Identify the critical DAAS elements and protect surface.
    • Align the business goals to the protect surface and critical DAAS elements.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Security Team
    • Business Executives
    • Subject Matter Experts From IT, Finance, HR, Legal, Facilities, Compliance, Audit, Risk Management

    Analyze your business goals

    Identifying business goals is the first step in aligning your zero trust roadmap with your business’ vision.

    • Security leaders need to understand the direction the business is headed in.
    • Wise security investments depend on aligning your security initiatives to business objectives.
    • Zero trust, and information security at large, should contribute to your organization’s business objectives by supporting operational performance, ensuring brand protection and shareholder value.
      • For example, if the organization is working on a new business initiative that requires the handling of credit card payments, the security organization needs to know as soon as possible to ensure the zero trust architecture will be extended to protect the PCI data and enable the organization to be PCI compliant.

      Info-Tech Insight

      Security and the business need to be in alignment when implementing zero trust. Defining the business goal helps rationalize the need for a zero trust implementation.

    1.1 Define your organization’s business goals

    Estimated time 1-3 hours

    1. As a group, brainstorm the business goals of the organization.
    2. Review relevant business and IT strategies.
    3. Review the business goal definitions in tab “2. Business Objectives” of the Zero Trust Protect Surface Mapping Tool, including the key goal indicator metrics.
    4. Record the most important business goals in the Business Goal column on tab “3. Protect Surfaces” of the Zero Trust Protect Surface Mapping Tool. Try to limit the number of business goals to no more than five primary goals. This limitation will be critical to help map the protect surface and the zero trust roadmap later.

    Input

    • Business and IT strategies

    Output

    • Prioritized list of business objectives

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/Flip Charts
    • Zero Trust Protect Surface Mapping Tool

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • IT Leadership
    • Business Stakeholders
    • Risk Management
    • Compliance
    • Legal

    Download the Zero Trust Protect Surface Mapping Tool

    Info-Tech Insight

    Developing a zero trust roadmap collaboratively with business stakeholders enables alignment with upcoming business priorities and industry trends.

    What does zero trust mean for you?

    For a successful implementation, focus on your zero trust outcome.

    This image describes the Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How for Zero Trust.

    Regardless of whether the user is accessing resources internally or externally, zero trust is posed to authenticate, authorize, and continuously verify the security policies and posture before access is granted or denied. Many network architecture can be local, cloud based, or hybrid and with users working from any location, there is no network perimeter as we knew it and the internet is now the corporate network.

    Zero trust framework seeks to extend the perimeter-less security to the present digital transformation.

    Understand protect surface

    Data, Application, Asset, and Services

    A protect surface can be described as what’s critical, most vulnerable, or most valuable to your organization. This protect surface could include at least one of the following – data, assets, applications, and services (DAAS) – that requires protection. This is also the area that zero trust policy is aimed to protect. Understanding what your protect surface is can help channel the required energy into protecting that which is crucial to the business, and this aligns with the shift from focusing on the attack surface to narrowing it down to a smaller and achievable area of protection.

    Anything and everything that connects to the internet is a potential attack surface and pursuing every loophole will leave us one step behind due to lack of resources. Since a protect surface contains one or more DAAS element, the micro-perimeter is created around it and the appropriate protection is applied around it. As a team, we can ask ourselves this question when thinking of our protect surface: to what degree does my organization want me to secure things? The knowledge of the answer to this question can be tied to the risk tolerance level of the organization and it is only fair for us to engage the business in identifying what the protect surface should be.

    Components of a protect surface

    • Data
    • Application
    • Asset
    • Services

    Info-Tech Insight

    The protect surface is a shift from focusing on the attack surface. DAAS elements show where the initiatives and controls associated with the zero trust pillars (Identity, Devices, Network, Application, and Data) need to be applied.

    Sample Scenario

    INDUSTRY: Healthcare

    SOURCE: Info-Tech Research Group

    Illustration

    A healthcare provider would consider personal health information a critical resource worthy of being protected against data exfiltration due to a host of reasons including but not limited to privacy regulations, loss of revenue, legal, and reputational loss; hence, this would be considered a protect surface.

    • What is the data that can’t be risked exfiltrated?
    • What application(s) is used to access this data?
    • What assets are used to generate and store the data?
    • What are the services we rely on to be able to access the data?

    DAAS Element

    • The data here is the patient information.
    • The application used to access the personal health information would be EPIC, OR list, and any other application used in that organization.
    • The assets used to store the data and generate the PHI would include physical workstations, medical scanners, etc.
    • The services that can be exploited to disrupt the operation or used to access the data would include active directory, single sign-on, etc.

    DAAS and Zero Trust Pillar

    This granular identification provides an opportunity to not only see what the protect surface and DAAS elements are but also understand where to apply security controls that align with the principle of zero trust as well as how the transaction flows. The application pillar initiatives will provide protection to the EPIC application and the device pillar initiatives will provide protection to the workstations and physical scanners. The identity pillar initiatives will apply protection to the active directory, and single sign-on services. The zero trust pillar initiatives align with the protection of the DAAS elements.

    Shift from attack surface to protect surface

    This image contains a screenshot of the thought map: Shift from attack surface to protect surface.  Go from complex to a micro perimeter approach.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The protect surface is a shift from focusing on the attack surface as it creates a micro-perimeter for the application of zero trust policies on the system. This drastically reduces the success of an attack whether internally or externally, reduces the attack surface, and is also repeatable.

    1.2 Identify critical DAAS elements

    Estimated time 1-3 hours

    1. As a group, brainstorm and identify critical, valuable, sensitive assets or resources requiring high availability in the organization. Each DAAS element is part of a protect surface, or sometimes, the DAAS element itself is a protect surface.
    • Data – The sensitive data that poses the greatest risk if exfiltrated or misused. What data needs to be protected?
    • Applications – The applications that use sensitive data or control critical assets. Which applications are critical for your business functions?
    • Assets – Physical or virtual assets, including an organization’s information technology (IT), operational technology (OT), or Internet of Things devices.
    • Services – The services an organization most depends on. Services that can be exploited to disrupt normal IT or business operations.
  • Record the critical DAAS elements and protect surface in their respective columns of the Zero Trust Protect Surface Mapping Tool. Try to limit the number of business goals to no more than five primary protect surfaces to match with the business goals.
  • Download the Zero Trust Protect Surface Mapping Tool

    Input

    • Critical resources to protect
    • Understanding of how they interoperate or connect

    Output

    • Protect surfaces

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/Flip Charts
    • Zero Trust Protect Surface Mapping Tool

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • IT Leadership
    • Business Stakeholders

    1.3 Map business goals to critical DAAS elements

    Estimated time 1-2 hours

    1. The protect surface will be generated from the critical DAAS elements as a standalone protect surface or a group of interconnected DAAS elements merged into one.
    • Each protect surface can be tied back to a business objective.
  • Select from the drop-down list of business objectives the option that fits the identified protect surface as it relates to the organization.
    • Type in your business objectives if the drop-down list does not apply.

    Download the Zero Trust Protect Surface Mapping Tool

    This image contains a screenshot from the Zero Trust Protect Surface Mapping Tool, with the following columns highlighted: Business Goal Name; Protect Surface Name

    Phase 2

    Assess Key Capabilities and Identify Zero Trust Initiatives

    Build a Zero Trust Roadmap

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Assess the organization’s current capabilities.
    • Define the zero trust target state.
    • Identify tasks to close gaps
    • Define zero trust initiatives and align zero trust initiatives to business goals and protect surfaces.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Security Team
    • Subject Matter Experts From IT, Finance, HR, Legal, Facilities, Compliance, Audit, Risk Management
    • Project Management Office

    The Info-Tech Zero Trust Framework

    Info-Tech’s Zero Trust Framework aligns with zero trust references, including:

    • ACT Zero Trust Cybersecurity Current Trends. 2019
    • NIST SP 800-207: Zero Trust Architecture. 2020
    • DOD Zero Trust Reference Architecture. 2021
    • NSA Embracing a Zero Trust Security Model. 2021
    • CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model. 2021
    • Executive Order (EO) 14028: Improving the Nation’s Cybersecurity, The White House. 2021
    • OMB Moving the U.S. Government Toward Zero Trust Cybersecurity Principles. 2022
    • NSTAC Zero Trust and Trusted Identity Management. 2022
    • NIST SP 800-53 r5: Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems and Organizations

    Identity

    • Authentication
    • Authorization
    • Privileged Access Management

    Applications

    • Software Defined Compute
    • DevSecOps
    • Software Supply Chain

    Devices

    • Authentication
    • Authorization
    • Compliance

    Networks

    • Software Defined Networking
    • Macro Segmentations
    • Micro Segmentation

    Data

    • Software Defined Storage
    • Data Loss Prevention
    • Data Rights Management

    Info-Tech Insight

    A best-of-breed approach ensures holistic coverage of your zero trust program while refraining from locking you into a specific reference.

    2.1 Review the Info-Tech framework

    Estimated time 30-60 minutes

    1. As a group, have the team review the framework within the Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool.
    2. Customize the tool as required using the instructions in tab “2. Setup”:
    • Define costing criteria
    • Define benefits criteria
    • Configure full-time equivalent hours and start year
    • Input business goals as mapped to protect surfaces (see next slide)

    Download the Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool

    Input

    • Protect surfaces mapped to business objectives

    Output

    • Customized framework

    Materials

    • Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • Subject Matter Experts From IT

    2.1.1 Input business goals as mapped to protect surfaces

    Refer to the Protect Surface Mapping Tool, copy the following elements from the Protect Surface tab.

    1. Enter Business Goals.
    2. Enter Protect Surfaces.
    3. Enter Data.
    4. Enter Application.
    5. Enter Assets.
    6. Enter Services.

    This image contains a screenshot from Info-Tech's Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool.  The Column headings are labeled as follows: 1: Business Goal Name; 2: Protect Surface; 3: DATA; 4: APPLICATION; 5: ASSETS; 6: SERVICES

    Info-Tech Insight

    Deriving protect surface elements from business goals reframes how security controls are applied. Assess control effectiveness in this context and identify zero trust capabilities to close any gaps.

    2.2 Assess current capabilities and define zero trust target state

    Estimated time 6-12 hours

    1. Using the Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool, review each of the controls in the Gap Analysis tab.
    2. Follow the instructions on the next slides to complete your current-state and target-state assessment.
    3. For most organizations, multiple internal subject matter experts will need to be consulted to complete the assessment.

    Download the Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool

    Input

    • Protect surfaces mapped to business objectives
    • Information on current state of controls, including sources such as audit findings, vulnerability and penetration test results, and risk registers

    Output

    • Current-state and target-state assessment for gap analysis

    Materials

    • Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • Subject Matter Experts From IT, Facilities, Audit, Risk Management

    Understanding security target states

    Maturity models are very effective for determining target states. This table provides general descriptions for each maturity level. As a group, consider which description most accurately reflects the ideal target state in your organization.

    AD HOC 01

    Initial/ad hoc security programs are reactive. Lacking strategic vision, these programs are less effective and less responsive to the needs of the business.

    DEVELOPING 02

    Developing security programs can be effective at what they do but are not holistic. Governance is largely absent. These programs tend to rely on the talents of individuals rather than a cohesive plan.

    DEFINED 03

    A defined security program is holistic, documented, and proactive. At least some governance is in place; however, metrics are often rudimentary and operational in nature. These programs still often rely on best practices rather than strong risk management.

    MANAGED 04

    Managed security programs have robust governance and metrics processes. Management and board-level metrics for the overall program are produced. These are reviewed by business leaders and drive security decisions. More mature risk management practices take the place of best practices.

    OPTIMIZED 05

    An optimized security program is based on strong risk management practices, including the production of key risk indicators (KRIs). Individual security services are optimized using key performance indicators (KPIs) that continually measure service effectiveness and efficiency.

    2.2.1 Conduct current-state assessment

    1. Carefully review each of the controls in the Gap Analysis tab that are needed for the protect surfaces. For each control, indicate the current maturity level of the organization. The tool uses the maturity levels of the CMMI model to score maturity.
    • Only use “N/A” if you are confident that the control is not required in your protect surfaces. For example, if the protect surfaces do not require or use software-defined computing, select “N/A” for any controls related to software-defined computing.
  • Provide comments to describe your current state. This step is optional but recommended as it may be important to record this information for future reference.
  • Select the target maturity for the control.
  • This image contains a screenshot from Info-Tech's Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool, with the following column headings highlighted and numbered: 1: Current Maturity; 2: Current State Comments (optional); Target Maturity

    Make sure that the gap between target state and current state is achievable for the current zero trust roadmap. For instance, if you set your current maturity to 1 – Ad Hoc, then having a target maturity of 4 – Managed or 5 – Optimized is not recommended due to the big jump.

    2.2.2 Review the Gap Analysis Dashboard

    1. Use the Dashboard to map your progress on assessing current- and future-state maturities. As you fill out the Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool, check with the Dashboard to see the difference between your current and target state.
    2. Use the color-coded legend to see the size of the gap between your current and target state.
    3. Zero trust processes that appear white have not yet been assessed or are rated as “N/A.”
    this image contains a screenshot of Info-tech's Zero-Trust framework discussed earlier in this blueprint, with the addition of a legend demonstrating how to use the gap analysis tool to identify the size of the gap between current and target states

    2.3 Identify tasks to close gaps

    Estimated time 5 hours

    1. Using the Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool, review each of the controls in the Gap Analysis tab.
    2. Follow the instructions on the next slides to identify gap closure tasks for each control that requires improvement.
    3. For most organizations, multiple internal subject matter experts will need to be consulted to complete the assessment.

    Download the Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool

    Input

    • Zero trust controls gap information

    Output

    • Gap closure task list

    Materials

    • Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • Subject Matter Experts From IT, Facilities, Audit, Risk Management

    2.3 Identify tasks to close gaps (cont.)

    1. For each of the controls where there is a gap between the current and target state, a gap closure task should be identified:
    • Review the example tasks and copy one or more of them if appropriate. Otherwise, enter your own gap closure task.
  • Considerations for identifying gap closure tasks:
    • In small groups, have participants ask, “what would we have to do to achieve the target state?” Document these in the Gap Closure Tasks column.
    • The example gap closure tasks may be appropriate for your organization, but do not simply copy them without considering whether they are right for you.
    • Not all gaps require their own task. You can enter one task that may address multiple gaps.
    • Be aware that tasks that are along the lines of “investigate and make recommendations” may not fully close maturity gaps.
    this image contains a screenshot from Info-Tech's Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool, with the following column heading highlighted and numbered: 1: Gap Closure Tasks

    Make sure that the Gap Closure Tasks are SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Timebound).

    2.4 Define tasks and initiatives

    Estimated time 2-4 hours

    1. As a group, review the gap tasks identified in the Gap Analysis tab.
    2. Using the instructions on the following slides, finalize your tab “5. Task List.”
    3. Using the instructions on the following slides, review and consolidate your tab “6. Initiative List.”

    Download the Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool

    Input

    • Gap analysis

    Output

    • Refined list of tasks
    • List of zero trust initiatives

    Materials

    • Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • Subject Matter Experts From IT, Facilities, Audit, Risk Management
    • Project Management Office

    2.4.1 Finalize your task list

    1. Define the gap closure task list in tab “5. Task List”:
      1. Obtain a list of all your tasks from Gap Closure Tasks column in tab “3. Gap Analysis.”
      2. Paste the list into the table in tab “5. Task List,” Task column.
    • Use Paste Values to retain the table formatting.
  • Consolidate tasks into initiatives when:
      • They have costs associated with them.
      • They require initial effort to implement and ongoing effort to maintain.
      • They must be accomplished dependently of other tasks.
    1. For each new initiative, create the initiative name on Initiative Name column in the tab “6. Initiative List.”
  • For tasks which are not incorporated into initiatives, enter a task owner and due date for each task.
  • this image contains a screenshot from Info-Tech's Zero Trust Gap analysis Tool with the following column headings highlighted and numbered: 1: Task; 2: Initiative Name; 3: (Task Owner; Due Date)

    Example: Initiative consolidation

    In the example below, we see three gap closure tasks within the Authentication process for the Identity pillar being consolidated into a single initiative “IAM modernization.”

    We can also see three gap closure tasks within the Micro Segmentation process for the Network pillar being grouped into another initiative “Network segmentation.”

    This image contains an example of Initiative Consolidation

    Info-Tech Insight

    As you go through this exercise, you may find that some tasks that you previously defined could be consolidated into an initiative.

    2.4.2 Finalize your initiative list

    1. As you go through this exercise, you may find that some tasks that you previously defined could be consolidated into an initiative.
    2. Review your final list of initiatives in tab “6. Initiative List” and make any required updates.
      1. Optionally, add a description or paste in a list of the individual gap closure actions that are associated with the initiative. This will make it easier to perform the cost and benefit analysis.
    3. Obtain a list of all gap closure tasks associated with an initiative by filtering the Initiative Name column in the Task List tab.
    4. Indicate the most appropriate pillar alignment for each initiative using the drop-down list.
      1. Refer to tab “5. Task List” for the pillar associated with an initiative under the Initiative Name column.

    This image contains a screenshot from Info-Tech's Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool, the following column headings are numbered and highlighted: 1: Initiative Name; 2: Description; 3: Pillar

    If the list of tasks is too long for the Description column, then you can also shorten the name of the tasks or group several tasks to a more general task.

    2.5 Align initiatives to business goals and protect surfaces

    Estimated time 30-60 minutes

    1. Using the instructions on the following slides, align initiatives to business goals in tab “6. Initiative List.”
    2. Using the instructions on the following slides, align initiatives to protect surfaces in tab “6. Initiative List.”

    Download the Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool

    Input

    • List of zero trust initiatives
    • Protect surfaces mapped to business objectives

    Output

    • List of zero trust initiatives aligned to business goals and protect surfaces

    Materials

    • Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • Subject Matter Experts From IT, Facilities, Audit, Risk Management
    • Project Management Office

    2.5.1 Align initiatives to business goals

    1. Indicate the most appropriate business goal(s) alignment for each initiative using the drop-down list in “Selection for Business Goal(s)” column.
      1. Use the legend to determine the most appropriate business goal(s).
    2. After that copy the selected business goal(s) to Business Goal(s) Alignment column.
    3. Then reset the selection using the blank cell in Selection for Business Goal(s) column.
    This image contains a screenshot from the Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool, with the following column headings numbered: 1: Selection for Business Goal(s); Business Goals Alignment; 3: Selection for Business Goals

    2.5.2 Align initiatives to protect surfaces

    1. Indicate the most appropriate protect surface(s) for each initiative using the drop-down list in Selection for Protect Surface(s) column.
      1. Use the legend to determine the most appropriate protect surface(s).
    2. After that copy the selected protect surface(s) to Protect Surface(s) Coverage column.
    3. Reset the selection using the blank cell in Selection for Protect Surface(s) column.
    This image contains a screenshot from the Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool, with the following column headings numbered: 1: Description; 2: Protect Surfaces Covered; 3: Selection for Protect Surfaces

    Phase 3

    Evaluate Candidate Solutions and Finalize Roadmap

    Build a Zero Trust Roadmap

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Define solution criteria.
    • Identify candidate solutions.
    • Evaluate candidate solutions.
    • Perform cost/benefit analysis.
    • Prioritize initiatives and build roadmap.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Security Team
    • Subject Matter Experts From IT, Finance, HR, Legal, Facilities, Compliance, Audit, Risk Management
    • Project Management Office

    3.1 Define solution criteria

    Estimated time 30-60 minutes

    1. As a group, review the scoring system within the Zero Trust Candidate Solutions Selection Tool.
    2. Customize the tool as required using the instructions on the following slides.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Don’t let your solution dictate your roadmap. Define your zero trust solution criteria before engaging in vendor selection.

    Download the Zero Trust Candidate Solutions Selection Tool

    Input

    • Zero trust initiative list

    Output

    • Zero trust candidate solutions

    Materials

    • Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool
    • Zero Trust Candidate Solutions Selection Tool

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • Subject Matter Experts From IT

    3.1.1 Define compliance and solution evaluation criteria

    On the Setup tab, provide a weight for each evaluation criterion to evaluate the candidate solutions. You can use “0%” weight if that criterion is not required in your solution selection.

    1. Verify that the Description for each criterion is accurate.
    2. Provide weights for the compliance score and the solution score, which are the overall evaluation:
    • Compliance score consists of tenets score, pillar score, threat protection score, and trust algorithm score.
    • Solution score consists of features score, usability score, affordability score, and architecture score.
    This image contains a screenshot from the Zero Trust Candidate Solutions Selection Tool, which demonstrates how to define compliance and solution evaluation criteria.

    3.1.2 Define remaining evaluation criteria

    On the Setup tab, provide a weight for each evaluation criterion to evaluate the candidate solutions. You can use “0%” weight if that criterion is not required in your solution selection.

    1. Verify that the Description for each criterion is accurate.
    2. Provide weights for the remaining evaluation criteria:
    • Tenets: Considers how well each initiative aligns with zero trust principles.
    • Pillars: Considers how well each initiative aligns with zero trust pillars.
    • Threats: Considers what zero trust threats are relevant with the candidate solution.
    • Trust Algorithm: Considers trust evaluation factors, trust evaluation process score, and input coverage.
    • Cost Estimation: Considers initial costs, which are one-time, upfront capital investments (e.g. hardware and software costs), and ongoing cost, which is any annually recurring operating expenses that are new budgetary costs (e.g. licensing, maintenance, subscription fees).
    • Deployment Architecture: Considers the solutions deployment architecture capabilities.

    This image contains a screenshot from the Zero Trust Candidate Solutions Selection Tool, and demonstrates where to define additional evaluation data

    Review available candidate solutions

    this image contains a list of available candidate Solutions.  This list includes: Zero Trust Identity; Zero-Trust Application & Workloads; Zero-Trust Networks; Zero-Trust Devices; and Zero-Trust Data

    The Rapid Application Selection Framework is a comprehensive yet fast-moving approach to help you select the right software for your organization

    Five key phases sequentially add rigor to your selection efforts while giving you a clear, swift-flowing methodology to follow.

    Awareness Education & Discovery Evaluation Selection Negotiation & Configuration
    1.1 Proactively Lead Technology Optimization & Prioritization 2.1 Understand Marketplace Capabilities & Trends 3.1 Gather & Prioritize Requirements & Establish Key Success Metrics 4.1 Create a Weighted Vendor Selection Decision Model 5.1 Initiate Price Negotiation With Top
    1.2 Scope & Define the Selection Process for Each Selection Request Action 2.2 Discover Alternative Solutions & Conduct Market Education 3.2 Conduct a Data-Driven Comparison of Vendor Features & Capabilities 4.2 Conduct Investigative Interviews Focused on Mission Critical Priorities With Top 2-4 Vendors 5.2 Negotiate Contract Terms & Product Configuration Two Vendors Selected
    1.3 Conduct an Accelerated Business Needs Assessment 2.3 Evaluate Enterprise Architecture & Application Portfolio 3.3 Narrow the Field to Four Top Contenders 4.3 Validate Key Issues With Deep Technical Assessments, Trial Configuration & Reference Checks 5.3 Finalize Budget Approval & Project Implementation Timeline
    1.4 Align Stakeholder Calendars to Reduce Elapsed Time & Asynchronous Evaluation 2.4 Validate the Business Case 5.4 Invest in Training & Onboarding Assistance

    Download the Rapid Application Selection Framework research

    Evaluate software category leaders through vendor rankings and awards

    SoftwareReviews

    The Data Quadrant is a thorough evaluation and ranking of all software in an individual category to compare platforms across multiple dimensions.

    The Data Quadrant Report

    Vendors are ranked by their Composite Score, based on individual feature evaluations, user satisfaction rankings, vendor capability comparisons, and likeliness to recommend the platform.

    Vendors ranked by their Composite Score

    The Emotional Footprint is a powerful indicator of overall user sentiment toward the relationship with the vendor, capturing data across five dimensions.

    Emotional Footprint

    Vendors are ranked by their Customer Experience (CX) Score, which combines the overall Emotional Footprint rating with a measure of the value delivered by the solution.

    Vendors ranked by their Customer Experience (CX) Score

    Sample whiteboard activity

    • Place sticky notes on the zero trust tenet that matches with the identified candidate solution to produce “solution requirements” that can be used to develop an RFP.
    • A sample sticky note is provided below for privileged access management.

    This image contains a screenshot of a sample whiteboard activity which can be done using sticky notes.

    • The PAM solution should support MFA
    • Live session monitoring, audit, and reporting
    • Should have password vaulting to prevent privileged users from knowing the passwords to critical systems and resources

    3.2 Identify candidate solutions

    Estimated time 2 hours

    1. As a group, have the team review the candidate solutions within the Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool.
    2. On tab 3 in the Zero Trust Candidate Solutions Selection Tool:
    • Review the candidate solutions within the Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool. For example, the candidate solutions with multifactor authentication (MFA) options are authenticators with SMS, mobile application, smartcard, or token.

    Input

    • Candidate solutions for zero trust tasks and initiatives

    Output

    • Suitability evaluation of candidate solutions

    Materials

    • Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool
    • Zero Trust Candidate Solutions Selection Tool

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • Subject Matter Experts From IT

    Info-Tech Insight

    Add a description associated with the candidate solution, e.g. reference link to vendors or manufacturers. This will make it easier to perform the evaluation.

    Download the Zero Trust Candidate Solutions Selection Tool

    3.2.1 Review candidate solutions

    1. Review the candidate solutions within the Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool. For example, the candidate solutions with multifactor authentication (MFA) options are authenticators with SMS, mobile application, smartcard, or token.
    2. Enter candidate solutions to the Compliance Data Entry tab on the Solution column within the Zero Trust Candidate Solutions Selection Tool.
    3. Optionally, add a description associated with the candidate solution, e.g. reference link to vendors or manufacturers. This will make it easier to perform the evaluation.
    this image contains a screenshot of a sample candidate solution, which can be done using Info-Tech's Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool

    3.3 Evaluate candidate solutions

    Estimated time 3 hours

    On the Scoring tab, evaluate solution features, usability, affordability, and architecture using the instructions on the following slides. This activity will produce a solution score that can be used to identify the suitability of a solution.

    Input

    • Candidate solutions

    Output

    • Candidate solutions scored

    Materials

    • Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool
    • Zero Trust Candidate Solutions Selection Tool

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • Subject Matter Experts From IT

    Download the Zero Trust Candidate Solutions Selection Tool

    3.3.3 Evaluate solution scores

    After all candidate solutions are evaluated, the Solution Score column can be sorted to rank the candidate solutions. After sorting, the top solutions can be used on prioritization of initiatives on Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool.

    1. On Features
      1. Enter Coverage.
      2. Enter Quality.
    2. Enter Usability.
    3. On Affordability
      1. Enter Initial Cost.
      2. Enter Ongoing Cost (annual).
    4. Enter Architecture.
    this image contains a screenshot of how you can sort the solution score column in Info-Tech's Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool

    3.4 Perform cost/benefit analysis

    Estimated time 1-2 hours

    1. Assign costing and benefits information for each initiative, following the instructions on the next slide.
    2. Define dependencies or business impacts if they will help with prioritization.

    Input

    • Ranked candidate solutions
    • Gap analysis
    • Initiative list

    Output

    • Completed cost/benefit analysis for initiative list

    Materials

    • Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool
    • Zero Trust Candidate Solutions Selection Tool

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • Subject Matter Experts From IT, Facilities, Audit, Risk Management
    • Project Management Office

    Download the Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool

    3.4.1 Complete the cost/benefit analysis

    Use Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool.

    1. On the Prioritization tab, use the drop-down lists to enter the estimated costs and efforts for each initiative, using the criteria defined earlier.
    • Use the result from candidate selection to define the estimated costs.
    • If you have actual costs available, you can optionally enter them under the Detailed Cost Estimates columns.
  • Enter the estimated benefits, also using the criteria defined earlier.
  • This image contains a screenshot of a cost/benefit analysis table which can be found in the Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool

    The Cost / Effort Rating is calculated based on the weight defined on step 2.1.1. The Benefit Rating is calculated based on the weight defined on step 2.1.2.

    3.4.2 Optionally enter detailed cost estimates

    Use Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool.

    1. For each initiative, the tool will automatically populate the Detailed Cost Estimates and Detailed Staffing Estimates columns using the averages that you provided in step 2.1.1. However, if you have more detailed data about the costs and effort requirements for an initiative, you can override the calculated data by manually entering it into these columns. For example:
    • You are planning to subscribe to a security awareness vendor, and you have a quote from them specifying that the initial cost will be $75,000.
    • You have defined your “Medium” cost range as being “$10-100K,” so you select medium as your initial cost for this initiative in step 3.4.1. As you defined the average for medium costs as being $50,000, this is what the tool will put into the detailed cost estimate.
    • You can override this average by entering $75,000 as the initial cost in the detailed cost estimate column.

    This image contains a screenshot of a sample cost/benefit table found in the Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool.

    The Benefits-Cost column will give results after comparing the cost and the benefit. Negative value means that the cost outweighs the benefit. Positive value means that the benefit outweighs the cost. Zero value means that the cost equals the benefit.

    3.5 Prioritize initiatives

    Estimated time 2-3 hours

    1. As a group, review the results of the cost/benefit analysis. Optionally, complete the Other Considerations columns in the Prioritization tab:
    • Dependencies can refer to other initiatives on the list or any other dependency that relates to activities or projects within the organization.
    • Business impacts can be helpful to document as they may require additional planning and communication that could impact initiative timelines.
  • Follow step 3.5.1 to create a visual effort map for your organization.
  • Follow step 3.5.2 and 3.5.3 to refine the effort map’s visual output.
  • Input

    • Gap analysis
    • Initiative list
    • Cost/benefit analysis

    Output

    • Prioritized list of initiatives

    Materials

    • Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • IT Leadership
    • Project Management Office

    Download the Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool

    3.5.1 Create a visual effort map for your organization

    1 hour

    An effort map is a tool used for the visualization of a cost and benefit analysis. It is a quadrant output that visually shows how your gap initiatives were prioritized based on tab 7 in the Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool.

    1. Establish the axes and colors for your effort map:
      1. X-axis represents the Benefit value from column J
      2. Y-axis represents the Cost/Effort value from column H
      3. Sticky note color is determined using the Alignment to Business value from column I
    2. Create sticky notes for each initiative and place them on the effort map or whiteboard based on the axes you have created with the help of your team.
    3. As you place initiatives on the visual effort map, discuss and modify rankings based on team member input.

    this image contains a sample visual effort map which can be found in the Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool.

    Input

    • Outputs from activities 3.4.1 and 3.4.2

    Output

    • High-level prioritization for each of the gap-closing initiatives
    • Visual representation of quantitative values

    Materials

    • Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool (tab 7)
    • Sticky notes
    • Markers
    • Whiteboard

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • IT Leadership
    • Project Management Office

    3.5.2 Refine the effort map’s visual output

    1 hour

    Once the effort map is complete, work to further simplify the visual output by categorizing initiatives based on the quadrant in which they have been placed.

    1. Before moving forward with the initiative wave prioritization (activity 3.7), identify any initiatives listed across all quadrants that are required as a part of compliance and mark with a sticky dot.
    2. Document these initiatives as Execution Wave 1.

    this image contains a screenshot of a refined visual effort map, which can be done by following the instructions in this section.

    Input

    • Outputs from activity 3.5.1

    Output

    • Prioritization for each of the gap-closing initiatives
    • First execution wave of gap-closing initiatives

    Materials

    • Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool (tab 7)
    • Sticky notes
    • Sticky dots
    • Markers
    • Whiteboard

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • IT Leadership
    • Project Management Office

    3.5.3 Refine the effort map’s visual output

    30 minutes

    1. Use a separate area of the whiteboard to draw out four to five Execution Wave columns.
    2. Group initiatives into each Execution Wave column based on their placement within the quadrant from activities 3.5.1 and 3.5.2.
      1. Ensure that all identified mandatory activities as per governing privacy law fall within the first wave.
      2. Leverage the following 0-4 Execution Wave scale:
        1. Underway –Initiatives that are already underway
        2. Must Do – Initiatives that must happen right away
        3. Should Do – Initiatives that should happen but need more time/support
        4. Could Do – Initiatives that are not a priority
        5. Won’t Do – Initiatives that likely won’t be carried out
    3. Indicate the granular level for each execution wave using the a-z scale.
    • Use the lettering to track dependencies between initiatives.
      • If one must take place before another, ensure that its letter comes first alphabetically.
      • If multiple initiatives must take place at the same time, use the same letter to show they will take place in tandem.

    This image depicts the sample output for a refined visual effort map

    Input

    • Outputs from activity 3.5.2

    Output

    • Prioritization for each of the gap-closing initiatives
    • First execution wave of gap-closing initiatives

    Materials

    • Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool (tab 7)
    • Sticky notes
    • Sticky dots
    • Markers
    • Whiteboard

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • IT Leadership
    • Project Management Office

    Wave assignment example

    In the example below, we see “IAM modernization” was assessed as 9 on cost/effort rating and 5 on benefit rating and its Benefits-Cost has a positive value of 1. We can label this as SHOULD DO (wave 2).

    We can also see “Network segmentation” was assessed as 6 on cost/effort rating and 4 on benefit rating and its Benefits-Cost has a positive value of 2. We can label this as MUST DO (wave 1).

    We can also see “Unified Endpoints Management” was assessed as 8 on cost/effort rating and 2 on benefit rating and its Benefits-Cost has a negative value of -4. We can label this as WON’T DO (no wave).

    We can also see “Data Protection” was assessed as 4 on cost/effort rating and 2 on benefit rating and its Benefits-Cost has a zero value. We can label this as COULD DO (wave 3).

    This image depicts a sample wave assignment output, discussed in this section.

    It is recommended to define the threshold of each wave based on the value of Benefits-Cost before assigning waves.

    3.6 Build roadmap

    Estimated time 2-3 hours

    1. As a group, follow step 3.6.1 to create your roadmap by scheduling initiatives into the Gantt chart within the Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool.
    2. Review the roadmap for resourcing conflicts and adjust as required.
    3. Review the final cost and effort estimates for the roadmap.

    Input

    • Gap analysis
    • Cost/benefit analysis
    • Prioritized initiative list

    Output

    • Zero trust roadmap

    Materials

    • Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • IT Leadership
    • Project Management Office

    Download the Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool

    3.6.1 Schedule initiatives using the Gantt chart

    1. On the Gantt Chart tab for each initiative, enter an owner (the role who will be primarily responsible for execution).
    2. Additionally, enter a start month and year for the initiative and the expected duration in months.
    • You can filter the Wave column to only see specific waves at any one time to assist with the scheduling.
    • You do not need to schedule Wave 4 initiatives as the expectation is that these initiatives will not be done.
    • This Image contains a screenshot of the Gantt Chart, with the following column headings highlighted and numbered: 1: Owner; 2: Expected Duration

    3.6.2 Review your roadmap

    1. When you have completed the Gantt chart, as a group review the overall roadmap to ensure that it is reasonable for your organization. Consider the following:
    • Do you have other IT or business projects planned during this time frame that may impact your resourcing or scheduling?
    • Does your organization have regular change freezes throughout the year that will impact the schedule?
    • Do you have over-subscribed resources? You can filter the list on the Owner column to identify potential over-subscription of resources.
    • Have you considered any long vacations, sabbaticals, parental leaves, or other planned longer-term absences?
    • Are your initiatives adequately aligned to your budget cycle? For instance, if you have an initiative that is expected to make recommendations for capital expenditure, it must be completed prior to budget planning.

    This image depicts an example roadmap which can be created following the use of the Gantt Chart

    3.6.3 Review your cost/effort estimates table

    1. Once you have completed your roadmap, review the total cost/effort estimates. This can be found in a table on the Results tab. This table will provide initial and ongoing costs and staffing requirements for each wave. This also includes the total three-year investment. In your review consider:
    • Is this investment realistic? Will completion of your roadmap require adding more staff or funding than you otherwise expected?
    • If the investment seems unrealistic, you may need to revisit some of your assumptions, potentially reducing target levels or increasing the amount of time to complete the strategy.

    This table provides you with the information to have important conversations with management and stakeholders.

    This image contains an example of the Zero Trust Roadmap Cost/Effort Estimates.  The column headings are as follows: Wave; Number of Initiatives; Initial Implementation - Cost; Initial Implementation - Effort; Ongoing Maintenance - Cost; Ongoing Maintenance - Effort.  A separate table is shown with the column heading: Estimated Total Three Year Investment

    Phase 4

    Formulate Policies for Roadmap Initiatives

    Build a Zero Trust Roadmap

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Formulate zero trust policies for critical DAAS elements.
    • Formulate zero trust policies to secure a path to access critical DAAS elements.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • CISO
    • Business Executives
    • IT Manager
    • Security Team

    Understand the zero trust policy

    Use the Kipling methodology as a vendor agnostic approach to identify appropriate allow list elements when deploying multiple zero trust solutions.
    The policies help to prevent lateral movement.

    Who Who should access a resource? Here, the user ID that identifies the users through the principle of least privilege is allowed access to a particular resource. The authentication policy will be used to verify identity of a user when access request to a resource is made. Who requires MFA?
    What What application is used to access the resource? Application ID to identify applications that are only allowed on the network. Port control policies can be used for the application service.
    When When do users access the resource? Policy that identifies and enforces time schedule when an application accessed by users is used.
    Where Where is the resource located? The location of the destination resource should be added to the policy and, where possible, restrict the source of the traffic either by zone and/or IP address.
    Why Why is the data accessed? Data classification should be done to know why the data needs protection and the type of protection (data filtering).
    How How should you allow access to the resource? This covers the protection of the application traffic. Principle of least privilege access, log all traffic, configure security profiles, NGFW, decryption and encryption, consistent application of policy and threat prevention across all locations for all local and remote users on managed and unmanaged endpoints are ways to apply content-ID.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The success of a zero trust implementation relies on enforcing policies consistently. Applying the Kipling methodology to the protect surface is the best way to design zero trust policies.

    4.1.1 Formulate policy

    Estimated time 1-2 hours

    1. As a group, review the protect surface(s) identified in phase one, and using the Kipling methodology from the previous slide, formulate a policy. Each policy can be reviewed repeatedly until we are sure it satisfies the goal.
    2. The policy created should be consistent for both cloud and on-prem environments.
    3. As an example, let's use the healthcare scenario found in tab 3 of the Zero Trust Protect Surface Mapping Tool. The protect surface used is "Automated Medication Dispensing." Another example will be "Salesforce" accessed via the cloud.
    Who What When Where Why How
    Method User-ID App-ID Time limit System Object Classification Content-ID
    On-Prem Pyxis_Users Pyxis Any Pyxis_server Severe (high value data) Decrypt, Inspect, log traffic
    Cloud Sales Salesforce Working hours Canada Severe (high value data) Decrypt, Inspect, log traffic

    Input

    • Kipling methodology
    • Protect surface

    Output

    • Zero trust policy

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/Flip Charts
    • Zero Trust Protect Surface Mapping Tool

    Participants

    • CIO
    • CISO
    • Business Executives
    • IT Manager
    • Security Team

    4.1.2 Apply policy

    1-2 hours

    1. Place each protect surface in its own microperimeter. Each microperimeter should be segmented by a next-generation firewall or authentication broker that will serve as a segmentation gateway.
    2. Name the microperimeter and place it on a firewall.

    Input

    • Kipling methodology
    • Protect surface

    Output

    • Zero trust policy

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/Flip Charts
    • Sticky Notes
    • Zero Trust Protect Surface Mapping Tool

    Participants

    • CIO
    • CISO
    • Business Executives
    • IT Manager
    • Security Team

    Microperimeter A
    Protect Surface:
    DAAS Elements:

    Who What When Where Why How
    Method User-ID App-ID Time limit System Object Classification Content-ID

    Microperimeter B
    Protect Surface:
    DAAS Elements:

    Who What When Where Why How
    Method User-ID App-ID Time limit System Object Classification Content-ID

    Microperimeter C
    Protect Surface:
    DAAS Elements:

    Who What When Where Why How
    Method User-ID App-ID Time limit System Object Classification Content-ID

    4.2 Secure a path to access critical DAAS elements

    How should you allow access to the resource?

    This component makes up the final piece of formulating the policies as it applies the protection of the application traffic.

    The principle of least privilege is applied to the security policy to only allow access requests and restrict the access to the purpose it serves. This access request is then logged as well as the traffic (both internal and external). Most firewalls (NGFW) have policy rules that, by default, enable logging.

    Segmentation gateways (NGFW, VM-series firewalls, agent-based and clientless VPN solutions), are used to apply zero trust policy (Kipling methodology) in the network, cloud, and endpoint (managed and unmanaged) for all local and remote users.

    These policies need to be applied to security profiles on all allowed traffic. Some of these profiles include but are not limited to the following: URL filtering profile for web access and protect against phishing attacks, vulnerability protection profile intrusion prevention systems, anti spyware profiles to protect against command-and-control threats, malware and antivirus profile to protect against malware, and a file blocking profile to block and/or alert suspicious file types.

    Good visibility on your network can also be tied to decryption as you can inspect traffic and data to the lowest level possible that is generally accepted by your organization and in compliance with regulation.

    Conceptualized flow

    With users working from anywhere on managed and unmanaged devices, access to the internet, SAAS, public cloud, and the data center will have consistent policies applied regardless of their location.

    The policy is validating that the user is who they say they are based on the role profile, what they are trying to access to make sure their role or attribute profile has the appropriate permission to the application, and within the stipulated time limit. Where the data or application is located is also verified and the why needs to be satisfied before the requested access is granted. Based on the mentioned policies, the how element is then applied throughout the lifecycle of the access.

    Who

    (Internet)

    What

    (SAAS)

    When

    Where

    (Public Cloud)

    Why

    How

    (Data Center)

    Method User-ID App-ID Time limit System Object Classification Content-ID
    On-Prem Pyxis_Users Pyxis Any Pyxis_server Severe (high value data) Decrypt, Inspect, log traffic
    Cloud Sales Salesforce Working hours Canada Severe (high value data) Decrypt, Inspect, log traffic

    Phase 5

    Monitor Zero Trust Roadmap Deployment

    Build a Zero Trust Roadmap

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Establish metrics for roadmap tasks.
    • Track metrics for roadmap tasks.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Security Team
    • Subject Matter Experts From IT, HR, Legal, Facilities, Compliance, Audit, Risk Management
    • Project Management Office

    5.1 Establish metrics for roadmap tasks

    Estimated time 2 hours

    1. On tab “2. Task & Metric Register” of the Zero Trust Progress Monitoring Tool, identify metrics to measure implementation and efficacy of tasks
    2. On tab “2. Task & Metric Register” of the Zero Trust Progress Monitoring Tool, document metric metadata.
    3. On the Prioritization tab, use the drop-down lists to enter the estimated costs and efforts for each initiative, using the criteria defined earlier.
    • If you have actual costs available, you can optionally enter them under the Detailed Cost Estimates columns.
  • Enter the estimated benefits, also using the criteria defined earlier.
  • Input

    • Zero trust roadmap task list

    Output

    • Metrics for measuring zero trust task implementation and efficacy

    Materials

    • Zero Trust Progress Monitoring Tool

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • Subject Matter Experts From IT, HR, Legal, Facilities, Compliance, Audit, Risk Management
    • Project Management Office

    Download the Zero Trust Progress Monitoring Tool

    5.1.1 Identify metrics to measure implementation and efficacy of tasks

    Estimated time 3-4 hours

    1. On tab “2. Task & Metric Register” of the Zero Trust Progress Monitoring Tool, for each section defined in columns C and D, enter zero trust implementation tasks into column E. If you completed the Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool, use the tasks identified there to populate column E.
    2. For each task, identify in column F any metrics that will communicate implementation progress and/or implementation efficacy.
    • If multiple metrics are needed for a single task, we recommend expanding the size of the row and adding additional metrics onto a new line in the same row. A sample is provided in the tool.

    this image contains a screenshot of tab 2 in the Zero Trust Progress Monitoring Tool

    Info-Tech Insight

    To measure the efficacy of a zero trust implementation, ensure you know what a successful zero trust implementation means for your organization, and define metrics that demonstrate whether that success is being realized.

    5.1.2 Document metric metadata

    Estimated time 1-2 hours

    For each metric defined in step 4.1.1:

    1. Identify in column G whether the metric can be measured now (Phase 1), measured in a few months’ time (Phase 2), or measured in a few years’ time (Phase 3).
    2. Identify in columns H through M who is responsible for collecting the metric (Person Source), who/what is consulted to collect the metric (Technology Source), who compiles the collected metric into dashboards and presentations (Compiler), and who is informed of the measurement of the metric (Audience).
    • Add more columns under the Audience category if needed.
    • Use “X” to identify if an audience group will be informed of the measurement of the metric.
  • Identify in columns N through P the target for the metric (Metric Target), the effort it takes to collect the metric (Effort to Collect), the frequency with which the organizations plans to collect the metric (Frequency of Collection), and any comments that people should know when collecting, compiling, or presenting metrics.
  • This image contains a screenshot from the Zero Trust Progress Monitoring Tool, with the following column headings numbered: 1: Priority; 2: Roles and Responsibilities; 3: effort to collect; frequency of collection; Metric Target; Comments

    5.2 Track and report metrics

    Estimated time 2 hours

    1. In the Zero Trust Progress Monitoring Tool, copy and paste metrics you plan to track in the tool from column F on tab 2 to column B on tab 3.
    2. Use tab 3 to identify collection frequency, metric target, and measurements collected for each metric. Add notes or comments to each metric or measurement to track contextual elements that could affect metric measurements.
    3. Leverage the graphs on tab 4 to communicate metrics to the appropriated audience groups, as defined in tab 2.

    Input

    • Metrics for measuring zero trust task implementation and efficacy

    Output

    • Metric data and graphs for presenting zero trust implementation metrics to audience groups

    Materials

    • Zero Trust Progress Monitoring Tool

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • Subject Matter Experts From IT, HR, Legal, Facilities, Compliance, Audit, Risk Management
    • Project Management Office

    Download the Zero Trust Progress Monitoring Tool

    5.2.1 Record baseline measurements for metrics

    Estimated time 1-2 hours

    On tab “3. Track Metrics” of the Zero Trust Progress Monitoring Tool:

    1. Copy and paste the metrics from Column F on tab “2. Task & Metric Register” that you want to track into Column B of this tab.
    2. For each metric, record the frequency of collection (Collection Frequency) and the metric target (Target) by referencing columns O and P on tab “2. Task & Metric Register.”
    3. Begin to record baseline/initial values for each metric in column E. Rename columns to match your highest frequency of collection.
      (e.g. if any metric is being measured monthly, there should be one column per month)
    4. Over time, conduct measurements of your metrics and store them in the table below.
    5. Add notes, as necessary.

    this image contains a screenshot of tab 3 of the Zero Trust Progress Monitoring Tool, with the following column headings numbered: 1: Your Metrics; 2: Collection Frequency; Target; 3: Jan; 4: Metric Measurements; 5: Notes

    5.2.2 Report metric health to audience groups

    Estimated time 1-2 hours

    On tab “4. Graphs” of the Zero Trust Progress Monitoring Tool:

    1. The Overall Metric Health gauge at the top of this tab presents the average percentage away from meeting metric targets for all metrics being tracked. To calculate this value, the differences between the most recent measurements and target values for each metric are averaged.
    2. Below the Overall Metric Health gauge, use the drop-down list in cell D9 to select one of the metrics from tab “3. Track Metrics.”
    3. Six different graphic representations of the tracked data for the selected metric will populate.

    Copy and paste desired graphs into presentations for audience members identified in step 5.1.2.

    This image contains a screenshot from tab “4. Graphs” of the Zero Trust Progress Monitoring Tool:

    5.3 Build a communication deck

    Estimated time 2 hours

    Leverage the Zero Trust Communication Deck to showcase the work that you have done in the tools and activities associated with this research.

    In this communication deck template, you will find the following sections:

    • Introduction
    • Protect Surfaces
    • Zero Trust Gap Analysis
    • Zero Trust Initiatives & Tasks

    Input

    • Protect surfaces mapped to business goals
    • Zero trust program gap analysis
    • Zero trust roadmap initiatives and tasks
    • Zero trust metrics

    Output

    • Communication deck for zero trust strategy

    Materials

    • Zero Trust Communication Deck

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • Subject Matter Experts From IT, HR, Legal, Facilities, Compliance, Audit, Risk Management
    • Project Management Office

    Download the Zero Trust Communication Deck

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Knowledge Gained

    • Knowledge of protect surfaces and the business goals protecting them supports
    • Comprehensive knowledge of zero trust current state and summary initiatives required to achieve zero trust objectives
    • Assessment of which solutions for zero trust tasks and initiatives are the most appropriate for the organization
    • A defined set of security metrics assessing zero trust implementation progress and efficacy

    Deliverables Completed

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Contact your account representative for more information

    workshops@infotech.com

    1-888-670-8889

    Additional Support

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech Workshop

    To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.

    Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.

    Contact your account representative for more information.

    This is a picture of an Info-Tech Account Representative
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool

    This is a screenshot from the Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool

    Assess current security capabilities and build a roadmap of tasks and initiatives that close maturity gaps.

    Zero Trust Progress Monitoring Tool

    This is a screenshot from the Zero Trust Progress Monitoring Tool

    Identify and track metrics for zero trust tasks and initiatives.

    Research Contributors

    • Aaron Benson, CME Group, Director of IAM Governance
    • Brad Mateski, Zones, Solutions Architect for CyberSecurity
    • Bob Smock, Info-Tech Research Group, Vice President of Consulting
    • Dr. Chase Cunningham, Ericom Software, Chief Strategy Officer
    • John Kindervag, ON2IT Cybersecurity, Senior Vice President, Cybersecurity Strategy and ON2IT Group Fellow
    • John Zhao, Fonterra, Enterprise Security Architect
    • Rongxing Lu, University of New Brunswick, Associate Professor
    • Sumanta Sarkar, University of Warwick, Assistant Professor
    • Tim Malone, J.B. Hunt Transport, Senior Director Information Security
    • Vana Matte, J.B. Hunt Transport, Senior Vice President of Technology Services

    Related Info-Tech Research

    This is a screenshot from Info-Tech's Build an Information Security Strategy

    Build an Information Security Strategy

    Info-Tech has developed a highly effective approach to building an information security strategy – an approach that has been successfully tested and refined for over seven years with hundreds of organizations. This unique approach includes tools for ensuring alignment with business objectives, assessing organizational risk and stakeholder expectations, enabling a comprehensive current-state assessment, prioritizing initiatives, and building out a security roadmap.

    This is a screenshot from Info-Tech's Determine Your Zero Trust Readiness.

    Determine Your Zero Trust Readiness

    IT security was typified by perimeter security. However, the way the world does business has mandated a change to IT security. In response, zero trust is a set of principles that can add flexibility to planning your IT security strategy.

    Use this blueprint to determine your zero trust readiness and understand how zero trust can benefit both security and the business.

    This is a screenshot from Info-Tech's Mature Your Identity and Access Management Program

    Mature Your Identity and Access Management Program

    Many organizations are looking to improve their identity and access management (IAM) practices but struggle with where to start and whether all areas of IAM have been considered. This blueprint will help you improve the organization's identity and access management practices by following our three-phase methodology:

    • Assess identity and access requirements
    • Identify initiatives using the identity lifecycle
    • Prioritize initiatives and build a roadmap

    Bibliography

    • “2021 Data Breach Investigations Report.” Verizon, 2021. Web.
    • “A Zero-Trust Strategy Has 3 Needs - Identify, Authenticate, and Monitor Users and Devices On and Off The Network.” Fortinet, 15 July 2021. Web.
    • “Applying Zero Trust Principles to Enterprise Mobility.” CISA, March 2022. Web.
    • Biden Jr., Joseph R. “Executive Order on Improving the Nation’s Cybersecurity.” The White House, 12 May 2021. Web.
    • “CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model.” CISA - Cybersecurity Division, June 2021. Web.
    • “Continuous Diagnostics and Mitigation Program Overview.” CISA, Jan. 2022. Web.
    • Contributor. “The Five Business Benefits of a Zero Trust Approach to Security.” Security Brief - Australia, 19 Aug. 2020. Web.
    • “Cost of a Data Breach Report 2021.” IBM, July 2021. Web.
    • English, Melanie. “5 Stats That Show The Cost Saving Effect of Zero Trust.” Teramind, 29 Sept. 2021. Web.
    • “Improve Application Access and Security With Fortinet Zero Trust Network Access.” Fortinet, 2 March 2021. Web.
    • “Incorporating Zero-trust Strategies for Secure Network and Application Access.” Fortinet, 21 July 2021. Web.
    • Jakkal, Vasu. “Zero Trust Adoption Report: How Does Your Organization Compare?” Microsoft, 28 July 2021. Web.
    • “Jericho Forum™ Commandments.” The Open Group, Jericho Forum, May 2007. Web.
    • Johnson, Derrick. “Zero Trust vs. SASE - Here's What You Need to Know.” Security Magazine, 23 July 2021. Web.
    • Joint Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) and National Security Agency (NSA) Zero Trust Engineering Team. “Department of Defense (DOD) Zero Trust Reference Architecture.” DoD CIO, Feb. 2021. Web.
    • Kay, Dennis. “Planning for a Zero Trust Architecture Target State.” NASA, NIST, 13 Nov. 2019. Web.
    • National Security Agency. “Embracing a Zero Trust Security Model.” U.S. Department of Defense, Feb. 2021. Web.
    • NSTAC. “Draft Report to the President - Zero Trust and Trusted Identity Management.” CISA, NSTAC, n.d. Web.
    • Rose, Scott W., et al. “Zero Trust Architecture.” NIST, 10 Aug. 2020. Web.
    • “Securing Digital Innovation Demands Zero-Trust Access.” Fortinet, 15 July 2021. Web.
    • Shackleford, Dave. “How to Create a Comprehensive Zero Trust Strategy.” SANS, Cisco, 2 Sept. 2020. Web.
    • “The CISO’s Guide to Effective Zero-Trust Access.” Fortinet, 28 April 2021. Web.
    • “The State of Zero Trust Security 2021.” Okta, June 2021. Web.
    • Kerman, Alper, et al. “Implementing a Zero Trust Architecture.” NIST - National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence, March 2020. Web.
    • Kindervag, John. “Keynote - John KINDERVAG - 021622.” Vimeo, VIRTUAL Eastern | CyberSecurity Conference, 16 Feb. 2022. Web.
    • Lodewijkx, Koos. “IBM CISO Perspective: Zero Trust Changes Security From Something You Do to Something You Have.” SecurityIntelligence, IBM, 19 Nov. 2020. Web.
    • VB Staff. “Report: Only 21% of Enterprises Use Zero Trust Architecture.” VentureBeat, 15 Feb. 2022. Web.
    • Young, Shalanda D. “Moving the U.S. Government Toward Zero Trust Cybersecurity Principles.” The White House, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT - OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, 26 Jan. 2022. Web.
    • “Zero Trust Access.” Fortinet, n.d. Web.
    • “Zero Trust Architecture Technical Exchange Meeting.” NIST - National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence, 12 Nov. 2019. Web.
    • “Zero Trust Cybersecurity Current Trends.” ACT-IAC, 18 April 2019. Web.
    • “Zero-Trust Access for Comprehensive Visibility and Control.” Fortinet, 24 Sep. 2020. Web.

    Document Business Goals and Capabilities for Your IT Strategy

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}77|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: IT Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /it-strategy
    • As a strategic driver, IT needs to work with the business. Yet, traditionally IT has not worked hand-in-hand with the business. IT does not know what information it needs from the business to execute on its initiatives.
    • A faster time to new investment decisions mean that IT needs a repeatable and efficient process to understand what the business needs.
    • CIOs must execute strategic initiatives to create an IT function that can support the business. Most CIOs fail because of low business support.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Understanding the business context is a must for all strategic IT initiatives. At its core, each strategic IT project requires answers to a specific set of questions regarding the business.
    • An effective CIO understands which part of the business context applies to which strategic IT project and, in turn, what questions to ask to uncover those insights.

    Impact and Result

    • Uncover what IT knows and needs to know about the business context. This is a necessary first step to begin each of Info-Tech’s strategic IT initiatives, which any CIO should complete.
    • Conduct efficient and repeatable business context discovery activities to uncover business context gaps.
    • Document the business context you have uncovered and streamline the process for executing on Info-Tech’s strategic CIO blueprints.

    Document Business Goals and Capabilities for Your IT Strategy Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should define the business context, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand how we can support you in completing key CIO strategic initiatives.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Identify and document the business needs of the organization

    Define the business context needed to complete strategic IT initiatives.

    • Document Business Goals and Capabilities for Your IT Strategy – Storyboard
    • Business Context Discovery Tool
    • Business Context Discovery Record Template
    • PESTLE Analysis Template
    • Strategy Alignment Map Template
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Document Business Goals and Capabilities for Your IT Strategy

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Identify the Missing Business Context (pre-work)

    The Purpose

    Conduct analysis and facilitate discussions to uncover business needs for IT.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A baseline understanding of what business needs mean for IT

    Activities

    1.1 Define the strategic CIO initiatives our organization will pursue.

    1.2 Complete the Business Context Discovery Tool.

    1.3 Schedule relevant interviews.

    1.4 Select relevant Info-Tech diagnostics to conduct.

    Outputs

    Business context scope

    Completed Business Context Discovery Tool

    Completed Info-Tech diagnostics

    2 Uncover and Document the Missing Context

    The Purpose

    Analyze the outputs from step 1 and uncover the business context gaps.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A thorough understanding of business needs and why IT should pursue certain initiatives

    Activities

    2.1 Conduct group or one-on-one interviews to identify the missing pieces of the business context.

    Outputs

    Documentation of answers to business context gaps

    3 Uncover and Document the Missing Context

    The Purpose

    Analyze the outputs from step 1 and uncover the business context gaps.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A thorough understanding of business needs and why IT should pursue certain initiatives

    Activities

    3.1 Conduct group or one-on-one interviews to identify the missing pieces of the business context.

    Outputs

    Documentation of answers to business context gaps

    4 Review Business Context and Next Steps

    The Purpose

    Review findings and implications for IT’s strategic initiative.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A thorough understanding of business needs and how IT’s strategic initiatives addresses those needs

    Activities

    4.1 Review documented business context with IT team.

    4.2 Discuss next steps for strategic CIO initiative execution.

    Outputs

    Finalized version of the business context

    Modernize Your Corporate Website to Drive Business Value

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}524|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 8.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $10,399 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 10 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Marketing Solutions
    • Parent Category Link: /marketing-solutions
    • Users are demanding more valuable web functionalities and improved access to your website services. They are expecting development teams to keep up with their changing needs.
    • The criteria of user acceptance and satisfaction involves more than an aesthetically pleasing user interface (UI). It also includes how emotionally attached the user is to the website and how it accommodates user behaviors.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Complication

    • Organizations are focusing too much on the UI when they optimize the user experience of their websites. The UI is only one of many components involved in successful websites with good user experience.
    • User experience (UX) is often an afterthought in development, risking late and costly fixes to improve end-user reception after deployment.

    Insights

    • Organizations often misinterpret UX as UI. In fact, UX incorporates both the functional and emotional needs of the user, going beyond the website’s UI.
    • Human behaviors and tendencies are commonly left out of the define and design phases of website development, putting user satisfaction and adoption at risk.

    Impact and Result

    • Gain a deep understanding of user needs and behaviors. Become familiar with the human behaviors, emotions, and pain points of your users in order to shortlist the design elements and website functions that will receive the highest user satisfaction.
    • Perform a comprehensive website review. Leverage satisfaction surveys, user feedback, and user monitoring tools (e.g. heat maps) to reveal high-level UX issues. Use these insights to drill down into the execution and composition of your website to identify the root causes of issues.
    • Incorporate modern UX trends in your design. New web technologies are continuously emerging in the industry to enhance user experience. Stay updated on today’s UX trends and validate their fit for the specific needs of your target audience.

    Modernize Your Corporate Website to Drive Business Value Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should modernize your website, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and discover the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Define UX requirements

    Reveal the opportunities to heighten the user experience of your website through a deep understanding of the behaviors, emotions, and needs of your end users in order to design a receptive and valuable website.

    • Modernize Your Corporate Website to Drive Business Value – Phase 1: Define UX Requirements
    • Website Design Document Template

    2. Design UX-driven website

    Design a satisfying and receptive website by leveraging industry best practices and modern UX trends and ensuring the website is supported with reliable and scalable data and infrastructure.

    • Modernize Your Corporate Website to Drive Business Value – Phase 2: Design UX-Driven Website
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Modernize Your Corporate Website to Drive Business Value

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Define Your UX Requirements

    The Purpose

    List the business objectives of your website.

    Describe your user personas, use cases, and user workflow.

    Identify current UX issues through simulations, website design, and system reviews.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Strong understanding of the business goals of your website.

    Knowledge of the behaviors and needs of your website’s users.

    Realization of the root causes behind the UX issues of your website.

    Activities

    1.1 Define the business objectives for the website you want to optimize

    1.2 Define your end-user personas and map them to use cases

    1.3 Build your website user workflow

    1.4 Conduct a SWOT analysis of your website to drive out UX issues

    1.5 Gauge the UX competencies of your web development team

    1.6 Simulate your user workflow to identify the steps driving down UX

    1.7 Assess the composition and construction of your website

    1.8 Understand the execution of your website with a system architecture

    1.9 Pinpoint the technical reason behind your UX issues

    1.10 Clarify and prioritize your UX issues

    Outputs

    Business objectives

    End-user personas and use cases

    User workflows

    Website SWOT analysis

    UX competency assessment

    User workflow simulation

    Website design assessment

    Current state of web system architecture

    Gap analysis of web system architecture

    Prioritized UX issues

    2 Design Your UX-Driven Website

    The Purpose

    Design wireframes and storyboards to be aligned to high priority use cases.

    Design a web system architecture that can sufficiently support the website.

    Identify UX metrics to gauge the success of the website.

    Establish a website design process flow.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Implementation of key design elements and website functions that users will find stimulating and valuable.

    Optimized web system architecture to better support the website.

    Website design process aligned to your current context.

    Rollout plan for your UX optimization initiatives.

    Activities

    2.1 Define the roles of your UX development team

    2.2 Build your wireframes and user storyboards

    2.3 Design the target state of your web environment

    2.4 List your UX metrics

    2.5 Draw your website design process flow

    2.6 Define your UX optimization roadmap

    2.7 Identify and engage your stakeholders

    Outputs

    Roles of UX development team

    Wireframes and user storyboards

    Target state of web system architecture

    List of UX metrics

    List of your suppliers, inputs, processes, outputs, and customers

    Website design process flow

    UX optimization rollout roadmap

    Application Maintenance

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}30|cart{/j2store}
    • Related Products: {j2store}30|crosssells{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Applications
    • Parent Category Link: /applications

    The challenge

    • If you work with application maintenance or operations teams that handle the "run" of your applications, you may find that the sheer volume and variety of requests create large backlogs.
    • Your business and product owners may want scrum or DevOps teams to work on new functionality rather than spend effort on lifecycle management.
    • Increasing complexity and increasing reliance on technology may create unrealistic expectations for your maintenance teams. Business applications must be available around the clock, and new feature roadmaps cannot be side-tracked by maintenance.

    Our advice

    Insight

    • Improving maintenance focus may mean doing less work but create more value. Your teams need to be realistic about what commitments they take—balance maintenance with business value and risk levels.
    • Treat maintenance the same as any other development practice. Use the same intake and prioritization practices. Uphold the same quality standards.

    Impact and results 

    • Justify the necessity of streamlined and regular maintenance. Understand each stakeholder's objectives and concerns, validate them against your staff's current state, processes, and technologies involved.
    • Maintenance and risk go hand in hand. And the business wants to move forward all the time as well. Strengthen your prioritization practice. Use a holistic view of the business and technical impacts, risks, urgencies across the maintenance needs and requests. That allows you to justify their respective positions in the overall development backlog. Identify opportunities to bring some requirements and features together.
    • Build a repeatable process with appropriate governance around it. Ensure that people know their roles and responsibilities and are held accountable.
    • Instill development best-practices into your maintenance processes.

    The roadmap

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    Get started.

    Read our executive brief to understand everyday struggles regarding application maintenance, the root causes, and our methodology to overcome these. We show you how we can support you.

    Understand your maintenance priorities

    Identify your stakeholders and understand their drivers.

    • Streamline Application Maintenance – Phase 1: Assess the Current Maintenance Landscape (ppt)
    • Application Maintenance Operating Model Template (doc)
    • Application Maintenance Resource Capacity Assessment (xls)
    • Application Maintenance Maturity Assessment (xls)

    Define and employ maintenance governance

    Identify the right level of governance appropriate to your company and business context for your application maintenance. That ensures that people uphold standards across maintenance practices.

    • Streamline Application Maintenance – Phase 2: Develop a Maintenance Release Schedule (ppt)

    Enhance your prioritization practices

    Most companies cannot do everything for all applications and systems. Build your maintenance triage and prioritization rules to safeguard your company, maximize business value generation and IT risks and requirements.

    • Streamline Application Maintenance – Phase 3: Optimize Maintenance Capabilities (ppt)

    Streamline your maintenance delivery

    Define quality standards in maintenance practices. Enforce these in alignment with the governance you have set up. Show a high degree of transparency and open discussions on development challenges.

    • Streamline Application Maintenance – Phase 4: Streamline Maintenance Delivery (ppt)
    • Application Maintenance Business Case Presentation Document (ppt)

     

     

    AI Trends 2023

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}207|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Business Intelligence Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /business-intelligence-strategy

    As AI technologies are constantly evolving, organizations are looking for AI trends and research developments to understand the future applications of AI in their industries.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Understanding trends and the focus of current and future AI research helps to define how AI will drive an organization’s new strategic opportunities.
    • Understanding the potential application of AI and its promise can help plan the future investments in AI-powered technologies and systems.

    Impact and Result

    Understanding AI trends and developments enables an organization’s competitive advantage.

    AI Trends 2023 Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. AI Trends 2023 – An overview of trends that will continue to drive AI innovation.

    • AI Trends Report 2023
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    AI Trends Report 2023

    The eight trends:

    1. Design for AI
    2. Event-Based Insights
    3. Synthetic Data
    4. Edge AI
    5. AI in Science and Engineering
    6. AI Reasoning
    7. Digital Twin
    8. Combinatorial Optimization
    Challenges that slowed the adoption of AI

    To overcome the challenges, enterprises adopted different strategies

    Data Readiness

    • Lack of unified systems and unified data
    • Data quality issues
    • Lack of the right data required for machine learning
    • Improve data management capabilities, including data governance and data initiatives
    • Create data catalogs
    • Document data and information architecture
    • Solve data-related problems including data quality, privacy, and ethics

    ML Operations Capabilities

    • Lack of tools, technologies, and methodologies to operationalize models created by data scientists
    • Increase availability of cloud platforms, tools, and capabilities
    • Develop and grow machine learning operations (MLOps) tools, platforms, and methodologies to enable model operationalizing and monitoring in production

    Understanding of AI Role and Its Business Value

    • Lack of understanding of AI use cases – how AI/ML can be applied to solve specific business problems
    • Lack of understanding how to define the business value of AI investments
    • Identify AI C-suite toolkits (for example, Empowering AI Leadership from the World Economic Forum, 2022)
    • Document industry use cases
    • Use frameworks and tools to define business value for AI investments

    Design for AI

    Sustainable AI system design needs to consider several aspects: the business application of the system, data, software and hardware, governance, privacy, and security.

    It is important to define from the beginning how AI will be used by and for the application to clearly articulate business value, manage expectations, and set goals for the implementation.

    Design for AI will change how we store and manage data and how we approach the use of data for development and operation of AI systems.

    An AI system design approach should cover all stages of AI lifecycle, from design to maintenance. It should also support and enable iterative development of an AI system.

    To take advantage of different tools and technologies for AI system development, deployment, and monitoring, the design of an AI system should consider software and hardware needs and design for seamless and efficient integrations of all components of the system and with other existing systems within the enterprise.

    AI in Science and Engineering

    AI helps sequence genomes to identify variants in a person’s DNA that indicate genetic disorders. It allows researchers to model and calculate complicated physics processes, to forecast the genesis of the universe’s structure, and to understand planet ecosystem to help advance the climate research. AI drives advances in drug discovery and can assist with molecule synthesis and molecular property identification.

    AI finds application in all areas of science and engineering. The role of AI in science will grow and allow scientists to innovate faster.

    AI will further contribute to scientific understanding by assisting scientists in deriving new insights, generating new ideas and connections, generalizing scientific concepts, and transferring them between areas of scientific research.

    Using synthetic data and combining physical and machine learning models and other advances of AI/ML – such as graphs, use of unstructured data (language models), and computer vision – will accelerate the use of AI in science and engineering.

    Event- and Scenario-Driven AI

    AI-driven signal-gathering systems analyze a continuous stream of data to generate insights and predictions that enable strategic decision modeling and scenario planning by providing understanding of how and what areas of business might be impacted by certain events.

    AI enables the scenario-based approach to drive insights through pattern identification in addition to familiar pattern recognition, helping to understand how events are related.

    A system with anticipatory capabilities requires an event-driven architecture that enables gathering and analyzing different types of data (text, video, images) across multiple channels (social media, transactional systems, news feeds, etc.) for event-driven and event-sequencing modeling.

    ML simulation-based training of the model using advanced techniques under the umbrella of Reinforcement Learning in conjunction with statistically robust Bayesian probabilistic framework will aid in setting up future trends in AI.

    AI Reasoning

    Most of the applications of machine learning and AI today is about predicting future behaviors based on historical data and past behaviors. We can predict what product the customer would most likely buy or the price of a house when it goes on sale.

    Most of the current algorithms use the correlation between different parameters to make a prediction, for example, the correlation between the event and the outcome can look like “When X occurs, we can predict that Y will occur.” This, however, does not translate into “Y occurred because of X.”

    The development of a causal AI that uses causal inference to reason and identify the root cause and the causal relationships between variables without mistaking correlation and causation is still in its early stages but rapidly evolving.

    Some of the algorithms that the researchers are working with are casual graph models and algorithms that are at the intersection of causal inference with decision making and reinforcement learning (Causal Artificial Intelligence Lab, 2022).

    Synthetic Data

    Synthetic data is artificially generated data that mimics the structure of real-life data. It should also have the same mathematical and statistical properties as the real-world data that it is created to replicate.

    Synthetic data is used to train machine learning models when there is not enough real data or the existing data does not meet specific needs. It allows users to remove contextual bias from data sets containing personal data, prevent privacy concerns, and ensure compliance with privacy laws and regulations.

    Another application of synthetic data is solving data-sharing challenges.

    Researchers learned that quite often synthetic data sets outperform real-world data. Recently, a team of researchers at MIT built a synthetic data set of 150,000 video clips capturing human actions and used that data set to train the model. The researchers found that “the synthetically trained models performed even better than models trained on real data for videos that have fewer background objects” (MIT News Office, 2022).

    Today, synthetic data is used in language systems, in training self-driving cars, in improving fraud detection, and in clinical research, just to name a few examples.

    Synthetic data opens the doors for innovation across all industries and applications of AI by enabling access to data for any scenario and technology and business needs.

    Digital Twins

    Digital twins (DT) are virtual replicas of physical objects, devices, people, places, processes, and systems. In Manufacturing, almost every product and manufacturing process can have a complete digital replica of itself thanks to IoT, streaming data, and cheap cloud storage.

    All this data has allowed for complex simulations of, for example, how a piece of equipment will perform over time to predict future failures before they happen, reducing costly maintenance and extending equipment lifetime.

    In addition to predictive maintenance, DT and AI technologies have enabled organizations to design and digitally test complex equipment such as aircraft engines, trains, offshore oil platforms, and wind turbines before physically manufacturing them. This helps to improve product and process quality, manufacturing efficiency, and costs. DT technology also finds applications in architecture, construction, energy, infrastructure industries, and even retail.

    Digital twins combined with the metaverse provide a collaborative and interactive environment with immersive experience and real-time physics capabilities (as an example, Siemens presented an Immersive Digital Twin of a Plant at the Collision 2022 conference).

    Future trends include enabling autonomous behavior of a DT. An advanced DT can replicate itself as it moves into several devices, hence requiring the autonomous property. Such autonomous behavior of the DT will in turn influence the growth and further advancement of AI.

    Edge AI

    A simple definition for edge AI: A combination of edge computing and artificial intelligence, it enables the deployment of AI applications in devices of the physical world, in the field, where the data is located, such as IoT devices, devices on the manufacturing floor, healthcare devices, or a self-driving car.

    Edge AI integrates AI into edge computing devices for quicker and improved data processing and smart automation.

    The main benefits of edge AI include:

    • Real-time data processing capabilities to reduce latency and enable near real-time analytics and insights.
    • Reduced cost and bandwidth requirements as there is no need to transfer data to the cloud for computing.
    • Increased data security as the data is processed locally, on the device, reducing the risk of loss of sensitive data.
    • Improved automation by training machines to perform automated tasks.

    Edge AI is already used in a variety of applications and use cases including computer vision, geospatial intelligence, object detection, drones, and health monitoring devices.

    Combinatorial Optimization

    “Combinatorial optimization is a subfield of mathematical optimization that consists of finding an optimal object from a finite set of objects” (Wikipedia, retrieved December 2022).

    Applications of combinatorial optimization include:

    • Supply chain optimization
    • Scheduling and logistics, for example, vehicle routing where the trucks are making stops for pickup and deliveries
    • Operations optimization

    Classical combinatorial optimization (CO) techniques were widely used in operations research and played a major role in earlier developments of AI.

    The introduction of deep learning algorithms in recent years allowed researchers to combine neural network and conventional optimization algorithms; for example, incorporating neural combinatorial optimization algorithms in the conventional optimization framework. Researchers confirmed that certain combinations of these frameworks and algorithms can provide significant performance improvements.

    The research in this space continues and we look forward to learning how machine learning and AI (backtracking algorithms, reinforcement learning, deep learning, graph attention networks, and others) will be used for solving challenging combinatorial and decision-making problems.

    References

    “AI Can Power Scenario Planning for Real-Time Strategic Insights.” The Wall Street Journal, CFO Journal, content by Deloitte, 7 June 2021. Accessed 11 Dec. 2022.
    Ali Fdal, Omar. “Synthetic Data: 4 Use Cases in Modern Enterprises.” DATAVERSITY, 5 May 2022. Accessed
    11 Dec. 2022.
    Andrews, Gerard. “What Is Synthetic Data?” NVIDIA, 8 June 2021. Accessed 11 Dec. 2022.
    Bareinboim, Elias. “Causal Reinforcement Learning.” Causal AI, 2020. Accessed 11 Dec. 2022.
    Bengio, Yoshua, Andrea Lodi, and Antoine Prouvost. “Machine learning for combinatorial optimization: A methodological tour d’horizon.” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 290, no. 2, 2021, pp. 405-421, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.07.063. Accessed 11 Dec. 2022.
    Benjamins, Richard. “Four design principles for developing sustainable AI applications.” Telefónica S.A., 10 Sept. 2018. Accessed on 11 Dec. 2022.
    Blades, Robin. “AI Generates Hypotheses Human Scientists Have Not Thought Of.” Scientific American, 28 October 2021. Accessed 11 Dec. 2022.
    “Combinatorial Optimization.” Wikipedia article, Accessed 11 Dec. 2022.
    Cronholm, Stefan, and Hannes Göbel. “Design Principles for Human-Centred Artificial Intelligence.” University of Borås, Sweden, 11 Aug. 2022. Accessed on 11 Dec. 2022
    Devaux, Elise. “Types of synthetic data and 4 real-life examples.” Statice, 29 May 2022. Accessed 11 Dec. 2022.
    Emmental, Russell. “A Guide to Causal AI.” ITBriefcase, 30 March 2022. Accessed 11 Dec. 2022.
    “Empowering AI Leadership: AI C-Suite Toolkit.” World Economic Forum, 12 Jan. 2022. Accessed 11 Dec 2022.
    Falk, Dan. “How Artificial Intelligence Is Changing Science.” Quanta Magazine, 11 March 2019. Accessed 11 Dec. 2022.
    Fritschle, Matthew J. “The Principles of Designing AI for Humans.” Aumcore, 17 Aug. 2018. Accessed 8 Dec. 2022.
    Garmendia, Andoni I., et al. Neural Combinatorial Optimization: a New Player in the Field.” IEEE, arXiv:2205.01356v1, 3 May 2022. Accessed 11 Dec. 2022.
    Gülen, Kerem. “AI Is Revolutionizing Every Field and Science is no Exception.” Dataconomy Media GmbH, 9 Nov. 9, 2022. Accessed 11 Dec. 2022
    Krenn, Mario, et al. “On scientific understanding with artificial intelligence.” Nature Reviews Physics, vol. 4, 11 Oct. 2022, pp. 761–769. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-022-00518-3. Accessed 11 Dec. 2022.
    Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems. “The real promise of synthetic data.” MIT News, 16 Oct. 2020. Accessed 11 Dec. 2022.
    Lecca, Paola. “Machine Learning for Causal Inference in Biological Networks: Perspectives of This Challenge.” Frontiers, 22 Sept. 2021. Accessed 11 Dec. 2022. Mirabella, Lucia. “Digital Twin x Metaverse: real and virtual made easy.” Siemens presentation at Collision 2022 conference, Toronto, Ontario. Accessed 11 Dec. 2022. Mitchum, Rob, and Louise Lerner. “How AI could change science.” University of Chicago News, 1 Oct. 2019. Accessed 11 Dec. 2022.
    Okeke, Franklin. “The benefits of edge AI.” TechRepublic, 22 Sept. 2022, Accessed 11 Dec. 2022.
    Perlmutter, Nathan. “Machine Learning and Combinatorial Optimization Problems.” Crater Labs, 31 July 31, 2019. Accessed 11 Dec. 2022.
    Sampson, Ovetta. “Design Principles for a New AI World.” UX Magazine, 6 Jan. 2022. Accessed 11 Dec. 2022.
    Sgaier, Sema K., Vincent Huang, and Grace Charles. “The Case for Causal AI.” Stanford Social Innovation Review, Summer 2020. Accessed 11 Dec. 2022.
    “Synthetic Data.” Wikipedia article, Accessed 11 Dec. 2022.
    Take, Marius, et al. “Software Design Patterns for AI-Systems.” EMISA Workshop 2021, CEUR-WS.org, Proceedings 30. Accessed 11 Dec. 2022.
    Toews, Rob. “Synthetic Data Is About To Transform Artificial Intelligence.” Forbes, 12 June 2022. Accessed
    11 Dec. 2022.
    Zewe, Adam. “In machine learning, synthetic data can offer real performance improvements.” MIT News Office, 3 Nov. 2022. Accessed 11 Dec. 2022.
    Zhang, Junzhe, and Elias Bareinboim. “Can Humans Be out of the Loop?” Technical Report, Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, NY, June 2022. Accessed 11 Dec. 2022.

    Contributors

    Irina Sedenko Anu Ganesh Amir Feizpour David Glazer Delina Ivanova

    Irina Sedenko

    Advisory Director

    Info-Tech

    Anu Ganesh

    Technical Counselor

    Info-Tech

    Amir Feizpour

    Co-Founder & CEO

    Aggregate Intellect Inc.

    David Glazer

    VP of Analytics

    Kroll

    Delina Ivanova

    Associate Director, Data & Analytics

    HelloFresh

    Usman Lakhani

    DevOps

    WeCloudData

    Enable Product Delivery – Executive Leadership Workshop

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}353|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Development
    • Parent Category Link: /development
    • You need to clearly convey the direction and strategy of your product portfolio to gain alignment, support, and funding from your organization.
    • IT organizations are traditionally organized to deliver initiatives in specific periods of time. This conflicts with product delivery, which continuously delivers value over the lifetime of a product.
    • Delivering multiple products together creates additional challenges because each product has its own pedigree, history, and goals.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Empowered product managers and product owners are the key to ensuring your delivery teams are delivering the right value at the right time to the right stakeholders.
    • Establishing operationally aligned product families helps bridge the gap between enterprise priorities and product enhancements.
    • Leadership must be aligned to empower and support Agile values and product teams to unlock the full value realization within your organization.

    Impact and Result

    • Common understanding of product management and Agile delivery.
    • Commitment to support and empower product teams.

    Enable Product Delivery – Executive Leadership Workshop Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Enabling Product Delivery – Executive workshop to align senior leadership with their transition to product management and delivery.

    • Enabling Product Delivery – Executive Workshop Storyboard

    2. Enabling Product Delivery –Executive Workshop Outcomes.

    • Enabling Product Delivery – Executive Workshop Outcomes
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Enable Product Delivery – Executive Leadership Workshop

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Understanding Your Top Challenges

    The Purpose

    Understand the drivers for your product transformation.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Define the drivers for your transition to product-centric delivery.

    Activities

    1.1 What is driving your organization to become product focused?

    Outputs

    List of challenges and drivers

    2 Transitioning From Projects to Product-Centric Delivery

    The Purpose

    Understand the product transformation journey and differences.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Identify the cultural, behavioral, and leadership changes needed for a successful transformation.

    Activities

    2.1 Define the differences between projects and product delivery

    Outputs

    List of differences

    3 Enterprise Agility and the Value of Change

    The Purpose

    Understand why smaller iterations increase value realization and decrease accumulated risk.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Leverage smaller iterations to reduce time to value and accumulated risk to core operations.

    Activities

    3.1 What is business agility?

    Outputs

    Common understanding about the value of smaller iterations

    4 Defining Products and Product Management in Your Context

    The Purpose

    Establish an organizational starting definition of products.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Tailor product management to meet the needs and vision of your organization.

    Activities

    4.1 What is a product? Who are your consumers?

    4.2 Identify enablers and blockers of product ownership

    4.3 Define a set of guiding principles for product management

    Outputs

    Product definition

    List of enablers and blockers of product ownership

    Set of guiding principles for product management

    5 Connecting Product Management to Agile Practices

    The Purpose

    Understand the relationship between product management and product delivery.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Optimize product management to prioritize the right changes for the right people at the right time.

    Activities

    5.1 Discussions

    Outputs

    Common understanding

    6 Commit to Empowering Agile Product Teams

    The Purpose

    Personalize and commit to supporting product teams.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Embrace leadership and cultural changes needed to empower and support teams.

    Activities

    6.1 Your management culture

    6.2 Personal Cultural Stop, Start, and Continue

    6.3 Now, Next, Later to support product owners

    Outputs

    Your management culture map

    Personal Cultural Stop, Start, and Continue list

    Now, Next, Later roadmap

    Further reading

    Enable Product Delivery – Executive Leadership Workshop

    Strengthen product management in your organization through effective executive leadership by focusing on product teams, core capabilities, and proper alignment.

    Objective of this workshop

    To develop a common understanding and foundation for product management so we, as leaders, better understand how to lead product owners, product managers, and their teams.

    Enable Product Delivery - Executive Leadership Workshop

    Learn how enterprise agility can provide lasting value to the organization

    Clarify your role in supporting your teams to deliver lasting value to stakeholders and customers

    1. Understanding Your Top Challenges
      • Define your challenges, goals, and opportunities Agile and product management will impact.
    2. Transitioning from Projects to Product-centric Delivery
      • Understand the shift from fixed delivery to continuous improvement and delivery of value.
    3. Enterprise Agility and the Value of Change
      • Organizations need to embrace change and leverage smaller delivery cycles.
    4. Defining Your "Products" and Product Management
      • Define products in your culture and how to empower product delivery teams.
    5. Connecting Product Management to Agile Practices
      • Use product ownership to drive increased ROI into your product delivery teams and lifecycles.
    6. Commit to Empowering Agile Product Teams
      • Define the actions and changes you must make for this transformation to be successful.

    Your Product Transformation Journey

    1. Make the Case for Product Delivery
      • Align your organization with the practices to deliver what matters most
    2. Enable Product Delivery – Executive Workshop
      • One-day executive workshop – align and prepare your leadership
      • Audience: Senior executives and IT leadership.
        Size: 8-16 people
        Time: 6 hours
    3. Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision
      • Enhance product backlogs, roadmapping, and strategic alignment
      • Audience: Product Owners/Mangers
        Size: 10-20 people
        Time: 3-4 days
    4. Deliver Your Digital Products at Scale
      • Scale Product Families to Align Enterprise Goals
      • Audience: Product Owners/Mangers
        Size: 10-20 people
        Time: 3-4 days
    5. Mature and Scale Product Ownership
      • Align and mature your product owners
      • Audience: Product Owners/Mangers
        Size: 8-16 people
        Time: 2-4 days

    Repeat workshops with different companies, operating units, departments, or teams as needed.

    What is a workshop?

    We WILL ENGAGE in discussions and activities:

    • Flexible, to accommodate the needs of the group.
    • Open forum for discussion and questions.
    • Share your knowledge, expertise, and experiences (roadblocks and success stories).
    • Everyone is part of the process.
    • Builds upon itself.

    This workshop will NOT be:

    • A lecture or class.
    • A monologue that never ends.
    • Technical training.
    • A presentation.
    • Us making all the decisions.

    Roles within the workshop

    We each have a role to play to make our workshop successful!

    Facilitators

    • Introduce the best practice framework used by Info-Tech.
    • Ask questions about processes, procedures, and assumptions.
    • Guide for the methodology.
    • Liaison for any other relevant Info-Tech research or services.

    Participants

    • Contribute and speak out as much as needed.
    • Provide expertise on the current processes and technology.
    • Ask questions.
    • Provide feedback.
    • Collaborate and work together to produce solutions.

    Understanding Your Top Challenges

    • Understanding Your Top Challenges
    • Transitioning From Projects to Product-Centric Delivery
    • Enterprise Agility and the Value of Change
    • Defining Your Products and Product Management
    • Connecting Product Management to Agile Practices
    • Commit to Empowering Agile Product Teams
    • Wrap-Up and Retrospective

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    • Products are the lifeblood of an organization. They deliver the capabilities needed to deliver value to customers, internal users, and stakeholders.
    • The shift to becoming a product organization is intended to continually increase the value you provide to the broader organization as you grow and evolve.
    • You need to clearly convey the direction and strategy of your product portfolio to gain alignment, support, and funding from your organization.

    Common Obstacles

    • IT organizations are traditionally organized to deliver initiatives in specific periods of time. This conflicts with product delivery, which continuously delivers value over the lifetime of a product.
    • Delivering multiple products together creates additional challenges because each product has its own pedigree, history, and goals.
    • Product owners struggle to prioritize changes to deliver product value. This creates a gap and conflict between product and enterprise goals.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    Info-Tech's approach will guide you through:

    • Understanding the top challenges driving your product initiative.
    • Improving your transitioning from projects to product-centric delivery.
    • Enhancing enterprise agility and the value of change.
    • Defining products and product management in your context.
    • Connecting product management to Agile practices.
    • Committing to empowering Agile Product teams.
    This is an image of an Info-Tech Thought Map for Accelerate Your Transition to Product Delivery
    This is an image of an Info-Tech Thought Map for Delier on your Digital Product Vision
    This is an image of an Info-Tech Thought Map for Deliver Digital Products at Scale via Enterprise Product Families.
    This is an image of an Info-Tech Thought Map for What We Mean by an Applcation Department Strategy.

    What is driving your organization to become product focused?

    30 minutes

    • Team introductions:
      • Share your name and role
      • What are the key challenges you are looking to solve around product management?
      • What blockers or challenges will we need to overcome?

    Capture in the Enable Product Delivery – Executive Leadership Workshop Outcomes and Next Steps.

    Input

    • Organizational knowledge
    • Goals and challenges

    Output

    • List of key challenges
    • List of workshop expectations
    • Parking lot items

    Transitioning From Projects to Product-Centric Delivery

    • Understanding Your Top Challenges
    • Transitioning From Projects to Product-Centric Delivery
    • Enterprise Agility and the Value of Change
    • Defining Your Products and Product Management
    • Connecting Product Management to Agile Practices
    • Commit to Empowering Agile Product Teams
    • Wrap-Up and Retrospective

    Define the differences between projects and product delivery

    30 minutes

    • Consider project delivery and product delivery.
    • Discussion:
      • What are some differences between the two?

    Capture in the Enable Product Delivery – Executive Leadership Workshop Outcomes and Next Steps.

    Input

    • Organizational knowledge
    • Internal terms and definitions

    Output

    • List of differences between projects and product delivery

    Define the differences between projects and product delivery

    15 minutes

    Project Delivery

    vs

    Product Delivery

    Point in time

    What is changed

    Method of funding changes

    Needs an owner

    Input

    • Organizational knowledge
    • Internal terms and definitions

    Output

    • List of differences between projects and product delivery

    Capture in the Enable Product Delivery – Executive Leadership Workshop Outcomes and Next Steps.

    Identify the differences between a project-centric and a product-centric organization

    Project

    Product

    Fund Projects

    Funding

    Fund Products or Teams

    Line of Business Sponsor

    Prioritization

    Product Owner

    Makes Specific Changes
    to a Product

    Product Management

    Improve Product Maturity
    and Support

    Assign People to Work

    Work Allocation

    Assign Work
    to Product Teams

    Project Manager Manages

    Capacity Management

    Team Manages Capacity

    Info-Tech Insight

    Product delivery requires significant shifts in the way you complete development work and deliver value to your users. Make the changes that support improving end user value and enterprise alignment.

    Projects can be a mechanism for funding product changes and improvements

    This is an image showing the relationship between the project lifecycle, a hybrid lifecycle, and a product lifecycle.

    Projects within products

    Regardless of whether you recognize yourself as a "product-based" or "project-based" shop, the same basic principles should apply.

    You go through a period or periods of project-like development to build a version of an application or product.

    You also have parallel services along with your project development, which encompass the more product-based view. These may range from basic support and maintenance to full-fledged strategy teams or services like sales and marketing.

    While Agile and product are intertwined, they are not the same!

    Delivering products does not necessarily require an Agile mindset. However, Agile methods help facilitate the journey because product thinking is baked into them.

    This image shows the product delivery maturity process from waterfall to continuous integration and delivery.

    Product roadmaps guide delivery and communicate your strategy

    In Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision, we demonstrate how the product roadmap is core to value realization. The product roadmap is your communicated path, and as a product owner, you use it to align teams and changes to your defined goals while aligning your product to enterprise goals and strategy.

    This is an image adapted from Pichler, What is Product Management.

    Adapted from: Pichler, "What Is Product Management?"

    Info-Tech Insight

    The quality of your product backlog – and your ability to realize business value from your delivery pipeline – is directly related to the input, content, and prioritization of items in your product roadmap.

    What is resilience?

    • Large vertical image:
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A

    Aside from the fact that operational resilience is mandated by law as of January 2025 (yes, next year), having your systems and applications available to your customers whenever they need your services is always a good idea. Customers, both existing and new ones, typically prefer smooth operations over new functionality. If you have any roadblocks in your current customer journey, then solving those is also part of operational resilience (and excellence).

    Does this mean you should not market new products or services? Of course not! Solving a customer journey roadblock is ensuring that your company is resilient. The Happy Meal is a prime example: it solved a product roadblock for small children and a profits roadblock for the company. For more info, just google it. But before you bring a new service online, be sure that it can withstand the punches that will be thrown at it. 

    What is resilience? 

    Resilience is the art of making sure your services are available to your customers whenever they can use them. Note I did not say 24/7/365. Your business may require that, but perhaps your systems need "only" to be available during "normal" business hours.

    Resilient systems can withstand adverse events that impair their ability to perform normal functions, and, like in the case the Happy Meals, increased peak demands. Events can include simple breakdowns (like a storage device, an internet connection that fails, or a file that fails to load) or something worse, like a cyber attack or a larger failure in your data center.

    Your client does not care what the cause is; what counts for the client is, "Can I access your service? (or buy that meal for my kid.)"

    Resilience entails several aspects:

    • availability
    • performance
    • right-sizing
    • hardening
    • restore-ability
    • testing
    • monitoring
    • management and governance

    It is now tempting to apply these aspects only to your organization's IT or technical parts. That is insufficient. Your operations, management, and even e.g. sales must ensure that services rendered result in happy clients and happy shareholders/owners. The reason is that resilient operations are a symphony. Not one single department or set of actions will achieve this. When you have product development working with the technical teams to develop a resilient flow at the right level for its earning potential, then you maximize profits.

    This synergy ensures that you invest exactly the right level of resources. There are no exaggerated technical or operational elements for ancillary services. That frees resources to ensure your main services receive the full attention they deserve.

    Resilience, in other words, is the result of a mindset and a way of operating that helps your business remain at the top of its game and provides a top service to clients while keeping the bottom line in the black. 

    Why do we need to spend on this?

    I mean, if it ain't broke, don't fix it. That old adage is true, and yet not. Services can remain up and running for a long time with single points of failure. But can you afford to have them break at any time? If yes, and your customers don't mind waiting for you to patch things up, then you can "risk-accept" that situation. But how realistic is that these days? If I cannot buy it at your shop today, I'll more than likely get it from another. If I'm in a contract with you, yet you cannot deliver, we will have a conversation, or at the very least, a moment of disappointment. If you have enough "disappointments," you will lose the customer. Lose enough customers, and you will have a reputational problem or worse.

    We don't like to spend resources on something that "may"go wrong. We do risk assessments to determine the true cost of non-delivery and the likelihood of that happening. And there are different ways to deal with that assessment's outcome. Not everything needs to have double the number of people working on it, just in case one resignes. Not every system needs an availability of 99,999%.

    But sometimes, we do not have a choice. When lives are at stake, like in medical or aviation services, being sorry is not a good starting point. The same goes for financial services. the DORA and NIS2 legislation in the EU, the CEA, FISMA, and GLBA in the US, and ESPA in Japan, to name a few, are legislations that require your company, if active in the relevant regulated sectors, to comply and ensure that your services continue to perform.

    Most of these elements have one thing in common: we need to know what is important for our service delivery and what is not.

    Business service

    That brings us to the core subject of what needs to be resilient. The answer is very short and very complex at the same time. It is the service that you offer to your customers which must meet reliance levels.

    Take the example of a hospital. When there is a power outage, the most critical systems must continue operating for a given period. That also means that sufficient capable staff must be present to operate said equipment; it even means that the paths leading to said hospital should remain available; if not by road, then, e.g., by helicopter. If these inroads are unavailable, an alternate hospital should be able to take on the workload. 

    Not everything here in this example is the responsibility of the hospital administrators! This is why the management and governance parts of the resilience ecosystem are so important in the bigger picture. 

    If we look at the financial sector, the EU DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act) specifically states that you must start with your business services. Like many others, the financial sector can no longer function without its digital landscape. If a bank is unexpectedly disconnected from its payment network, especially SWIFT, it will not be long before there are existential issues. A trading department stands to lose millions if the trading system fails. 

    Look in your own environment; you will see many such points. What if your internet connection goes down, and you rely on it for most of your business? How long can you afford to be out? How long before your clients notice and take action? Do you supply a small but critical service to an institution? Then, you may fall under the aforementioned laws (it's called third-party requirements, and your client may be liable to follow them.)

    But also, outside of the technology, we see points in the supply chain that require resilience. Do you still rely on a single person or provider for a critical function? Do you have backup procedures if the tech stops working, yet your clients require you to continue to service them? 

    In all these and other cases, you must know what your critical services are so that you can analyze the requirements and put the right measures in place.

    Once you have defined your critical business services and have analyzed their operational requirements, you can start to look at what you need to implement the aforementioned areas of availability, monitoring, hardening, and others. Remember we're still at the level of business service. The tech comes later and will require a deeper analysis. 

    In conclusion.

    Resilient operations ensure that you continue to function, at the right price, in the face of adverse events. If you can, resilience starts at the business level from the moment of product conception. If the products have long been developed, look at how they are delivered to the client and upgrade operations, resources, and tech where needed.

    In some cases, you are legally required to undertake this exercise. But in all cases, it is important that you understand your business services and the needs of your clients and put sufficient resources in the right places of your delivery chain. 

    If you want to discuss this further, please contact me for a free talk.

     

    IT Operations

    Manage Service Catalogs

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}44|cart{/j2store}
    • Related Products: {j2store}44|crosssells{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.0/10
    • member rating average dollars saved: $3,956
    • member rating average days saved: 24
    • Parent Category Name: Service Planning and Architecture
    • Parent Category Link: /service-planning-and-architecture

    The challenge

    • Your business users may not be aware of the full scope of your services.
    • Typically service information is written in technical jargon. For business users, this means that the information will be tough to understand.
    • Without a service catalog, you have no agreement o what is available, so business will assume that everything is.

    Our advice

    Insight

    • Define your services from a user's or customer perspective.
      • When your service catalog contains too much information that does not apply to most users, they will not use it.
    • Separate the line-of-business services from enterprise services. It simplifies your documentation process and makes the service catalog more comfortable to use.

    Impact and results 

    • Our approach helps you organize your service catalog in a business-friendly way while keeping it manageable for IT.
    • And manageable also means that your service catalog remains a living document. You can update your service records easily.
    • Your service catalog forms a visible bridge between IT and the business. Improve IT's perception by communicating the benefits of the service catalog.

    The roadmap

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    Get started

    Our concise executive brief shows you why building a service catalog is a good idea for your company. We'll show you our methodology and the ways we can help you in handling this.

    Minimize the risks from attrition through an effective knowledge transfer process.

    Launch the initiative

    Our launch phase will walk you through the charter template, build help a balanced team, create your change message and communication plan to obtain buy-in from all your organization's stakeholders.

    • Design & Build a User-Facing Service Catalog – Phase 1: Launch the Project (ppt)
    • Service Catalog Project Charter (doc)

    Identify and define the enterprise services

    Group enterprise services which you offer to everyone in the company, logically together.

    • Design & Build a User-Facing Service Catalog – Phase 2: Identify and Define Enterprise Services (ppt)
    • Sample Enterprise Services (ppt)

    Identify and define your line-of-business (LOB) services

    These services apply only to one business line. Other business users should not see them in the catalog.

    • Design & Build a User-Facing Service Catalog – Phase 3: Identify and Define Line of Business Services (ppt)
    • Sample LOB Services – Industry Specific (ppt)
    • Sample LOB Services – Functional Group (ppt)

    Complete your services definition chart

    Complete this chart to allow the business to pick what services to include in the service catalog. It also allows you to extend the catalog with technical services by including IT-facing services. Of course, separated-out only for IT.

    • Design & Build a User-Facing Service Catalog – Phase 4: Complete Service Definitions (ppt)
    • Services Definition Chart (xls)

    Establish an Analytics Operating Model

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}339|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $8,449 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 6 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Data Management
    • Parent Category Link: /data-management
    • Organizations are struggling to understand what's involved in the analytics developer lifecycle to generate reusable insights faster.
    • Discover what it takes to become a citizen analytics developer. Identify the proper way to enable self-serve analytics.
    • Self-serve business intelligence/analytics is misunderstood and confusing to the business, especially with regards to the roles and responsibilities of IT and the business.
    • End users are dissatisfied due to a lack of access to the data and the absence of a single source of truth.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Organizations that take data seriously should:

    • Decouple processes in which data is separated from business processes and elevate the visibility of the organization's data assets.
    • Leverage a secure platform where data can be easily exchanged for insights generation.
    • Create density for analytics where resources are mobilized around analytics ideas to generate value.

    Analytics is a journey, not a destination. This journey can eventually result in some level of sophisticated AI/machine learning in your organization. Every organization needs to mobilize its resources and enhance its analytics capabilities to quickly and incrementally add value to data products and services. However, most organizations fail to mobilize their resources in this way.

    Impact and Result

    • Firms become more agile when they realize efficiencies in their analytics operating models and can quickly implement reusable analytics.
    • IT becomes more flexible and efficient in understanding the business' data needs and eliminates redundant processes.
    • Trust in data-driven decision making goes up with collaboration, engagement, and transparency.
    • There is a clear path to continuous improvement in analytics.

    Establish an Analytics Operating Model Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief that outlines Info-Tech’s methodology for assessing the business' analytics needs and aligning your data governance, capabilities, and organizational structure to deliver analytics faster.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Define your analytics needs

    This phase helps you understand your organization's data landscape and current analytics environment so you gain a deeper understanding of your future analytics needs.

    • Establish an Analytics Operating Model – Phase 1: Define Your Analytics Needs

    2. Establish an analytics operating model

    This phase introduces you to data operating model frameworks and provides a step-by-step guide on how to capture the right analytics operating model for your organization.

    • Establish an Analytics Operating Model – Phase 2: Establish an Analytics Operating Model
    • Analytics Operating Model Building Tool

    3. Implement your operating model

    This phase helps you implement your chosen analytics operating model, as well as establish an engagement model and communications plan.

    • Establish an Analytics Operating Model – Phase 3: Implement Your Analytics Operating Model
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Establish an Analytics Operating Model

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Define Your Analytics Needs

    The Purpose

    Achieve a clear understanding and case for data analytics.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A successful analytics operating model starts with a good understanding of your analytical needs.

    Activities

    1.1 Review the business context.

    1.2 Understand your analytics needs.

    1.3 Draft analytics ideas and use cases.

    1.4 Capture minimum viable analytics.

    Outputs

    Documentation of analytics products and services

    2 Perform an Analytics Capability Assessment

    The Purpose

    Achieve a clear understanding of your organization's analytics capability and mapping across organizational functions.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understand your organization's data landscape and current analytics environment to gain a deeper understanding of your future analytics needs.

    Activities

    2.1 Capture your analytics capabilities.

    2.2 Map capabilities to a hub-and-spoke model.

    2.3 Document operating model results.

    Outputs

    Capability assessment results

    3 Establish an Analytics Operating Model

    The Purpose

    Capture the right analytics operating model for your organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Explore data operating model frameworks.

    Capture the right analytics operating model for your organization using a step-by-step guide.

    Activities

    3.1 Discuss your operating model results.

    3.2 Review your organizational structure’s pros and cons.

    3.3 Map resources to target structure.

    3.4 Brainstorm initiatives to develop your analytics capabilities.

    Outputs

    Target operating model

    4 Implement Your Analytics Operating Model

    The Purpose

    Formalize your analytics organizational structure and prepare to implement your chosen analytics operating model.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Implement your chosen analytics operating model.

    Establish an engagement model and communications plan.

    Activities

    4.1 Document your target organizational structure and RACI.

    4.2 Establish an analytics engagement model.

    4.3 Develop an analytics communications plan.

    Outputs

    Reporting and analytics responsibility matrix (RACI)

    Analytics engagement model

    Analytics communications plan

    Analytics organizational chart

    Create a Holistic IT Dashboard

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}117|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.5/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $8,049 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 8 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Performance Measurement
    • Parent Category Link: /performance-measurement
    • IT leaders do not have a single holistic view of how their 45 IT processes are operating.
    • Expecting any single individual to understand the details of all 45 IT processes is unrealistic.
    • Problems in performance only become evident when the process has already failed.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Mature your IT department by measuring what matters.
    • Don’t measure things just because you can; change what you measure as your organization matures.

    Impact and Result

    • Use Info-Tech’s IT Metrics Library to review typical KPIs for each of the 45 process areas and select those that apply to your organization.
    • Configure your IT Management Dashboard to record your selected KPIs and start to measure performance.
    • Set up the cadence for review of the KPIs and develop action plans to improve low-performing indicators.

    Create a Holistic IT Dashboard Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out how to develop your KPI program that leads to improved performance.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Choose the KPIs

    Identify the KPIs that matter to your organization’s goals.

    • Create a Holistic IT Dashboard – Phase 1: Choose the KPIs
    • IT Metrics Library

    2. Build the Dashboard

    Use the IT Management Dashboard on the Info-Tech website to display your chosen KPIs.

    • Create a Holistic IT Dashboard – Phase 2: Build the Dashboard

    3. Create the Action Plan

    Use the review of your KPIs to build an action plan to drive performance.

    • Create a Holistic IT Dashboard – Phase 3: Build the Action Plan
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Create a Holistic IT Dashboard

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Identify What to Measure (Offsite)

    The Purpose

    Determine the KPIs that matter to your organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Identify organizational goals

    Identify IT goals and their organizational goal alignment

    Identify business pain points

    Activities

    1.1 Identify organizational goals.

    1.2 Identify IT goals and organizational alignment.

    1.3 Identify business pain points.

    Outputs

    List of goals and pain points to create KPIs for

    2 Configure the Dashboard Tool (Onsite)

    The Purpose

    Learn how to configure and use the IT Management Dashboard.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Configured IT dashboard

    Initial IT scorecard report

    Activities

    2.1 Review metrics and KPI best practices.

    2.2 Use the IT Metrics Library.

    2.3 Select the KPIs for your organization.

    2.4 Use the IT Management Dashboard.

    Outputs

    Definition of KPIs to be used, data sources, and ownership

    Configured IT dashboard

    3 Review and Develop the Action Plan

    The Purpose

    Learn how to review and plan actions based on the KPIs.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Lead KPI review to actions to improve performance

    Activities

    3.1 Create the scorecard report.

    3.2 Interpret the results of the dashboard.

    3.3 Use the IT Metrics Library to review suggested actions.

    Outputs

    Initial IT scorecard report

    Action plan with initial actions

    4 Improve Your KPIs (Onsite)

    The Purpose

    Use your KPIs to drive performance.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Improve your metrics program to drive effectiveness

    Activities

    4.1 Develop your action plan.

    4.2 Execute the plan and tracking progress.

    4.3 Develop new KPIs as your practice matures.

    Outputs

    Understanding of how to develop new KPIs using the IT Metrics Library

    5 Next Steps and Wrap-Up (Offsite)

    The Purpose

    Ensure all documentation and plans are complete.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Documented next steps

    Activities

    5.1 Complete IT Metrics Library documentation.

    5.2 Document decisions and next steps.

    Outputs

    IT Metrics Library

    Action plan

    Further reading

    Create a Holistic IT Dashboard

    Mature your IT department by measuring what matters.

    Executive Brief

    Analyst Perspective

    Measurement alone provides only minimal improvements

    It’s difficult for CIOs and other top-level leaders of IT to know if everything within their mandate is being managed effectively. Gaining visibility into what’s happening on the front lines without micromanaging is a challenge most top leaders face.

    Understanding Info-Tech’s Management and Governance Framework of processes that need to be managed and being able to measure what’s important to their organization's success can give leaders the ability to focus on their key responsibilities of ensuring service effectiveness, enabling increased productivity, and creating the ability for their teams to innovate.

    Even if you know what to measure, the measurement alone will lead to minimal improvements. Having the right methods in place to systematically collect, review, and act on those measurements is the differentiator to driving up the maturity of your IT organization.

    The tools in this blueprint can help you identify what to measure, how to review it, and how to create effective plans to improve performance.

    Tony Denford

    Research Director, Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    • IT leaders do not have a single holistic view of how their IT processes are operating.
    • Expecting any single individual to understand the details of all IT processes is unrealistic.
    • Problems in performance only become evident when the process has already failed.

    Common Obstacles

    • Business changes quickly, and what should be measured changes as a result.
    • Most measures are trailing indicators showing past performance.
    • Measuring alone does not result in improved performance.
    • There are thousands of operational metrics that could be measured, but what are the right ones for an overall dashboard?

    Info-Tech's Approach

    • Use Info-Tech’s IT Metrics Library to review typical KPIs for each of the process areas and select those that apply to your organization.
    • Configure your IT Management Dashboard to record your selected KPIs and start to measure performance.
    • Set up the cadence for review of the KPIs and develop action plans to improve low-performing indicators.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Mature your IT department by aligning your measures with your organizational goals. Acting early when your KPIs deviate from the goals leads to improved performance.

    Your challenge

    This research is designed to help organizations quickly choose holistic measures, review the results, and devise action plans.

    • The sheer number of possible metrics can be overwhelming. Choose metrics from our IT Metrics Library or choose your own, but always ensure they are in alignment with your organizational goals.
    • Ensure your dashboard is balanced across all 45 process areas that a modern CIO is responsible for.
    • Finding leading indicators to allow your team to be proactive can be difficult if your team is focused on the day-to-day operational tasks.
    • It can be time consuming to figure out what to do if an indicator is underperforming.

    Build your dashboard quickly using the toolset in this research and move to improvement actions as soon as possible.

    The image is a bar graph, titled KPI-based improvements. On the X-axis are four categories, each with one bar for Before KPIs and another for After KPIs. The categories are: Productivity; Fire Incidents; Request Response Time; and Savings.

    Productivity increased by 30%

    Fire/smoke incidents decreased by 25% (high priority)

    Average work request response time reduced by 64%

    Savings of $1.6 million in the first year

    (CFI, 2013)

    Common obstacles

    These barriers make this challenge difficult to address for many organizations:

    • What should be measured can change over time as your organization matures and the business environment changes. Understanding what creates business value for your organization is critical.
    • Organizations almost always focus on past result metrics. While this is important, it will not indicate when you need to adjust something until it has already failed.
    • It’s not just about measuring. You also need to review the measures often and act on the biggest risks to your organization to drive performance.

    Don’t get overwhelmed by the number of things you can measure. It can take some trial and error to find the measures that best indicate the health of the process.

    The importance of frequent review

    35% - Only 35% of governing bodies review data at each meeting. (Committee of University Chairs, 2008)

    Common obstacles

    Analysis paralysis

    Poor data can lead to incorrect conclusions, limit analysis, and undermine confidence in the value of your dashboard.

    Achieving perfect data is extremely time consuming and may not add much value. It can also be an excuse to avoid getting started with metrics and analytics.

    Data quality is a struggle for many organizations. Consider how much uncertainty you can tolerate in your analysis and what would be required to improve your data quality to an acceptable level. Consider cost, technological resources, people resources, and time required.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Analytics are only as good as the data that informs it. Aim for just enough data quality to make informed decisions without getting into analysis paralysis.

    Common obstacles

    The problem of surrogation

    Tying KPIs and metrics to performance often leads to undesired behavior. An example of this is the now infamous Wells Fargo cross-selling scandal, in which 3.5 million credit card and savings accounts were opened without customers’ consent when the company incented sales staff to meet cross-selling targets.

    Although this is an extreme example, it’s an all-too-common phenomenon.

    A focus on the speed of closure of tickets often leads to shortcuts and lower-quality solutions.

    Tying customer value to the measures can align the team on understanding the objective rather than focusing on the measure itself, and the team will no longer be able to ignore the impact of their actions.

    Surrogation is a phenomenon in which a measure of a behavior replaces the intent of the measure itself. People focus on achieving the measure instead of the behavior the measure was intended to drive.

    Info-Tech’s thought model

    The Threefold Role of the IT Executive Core CIO Objectives
    IT Organization - Manager A - Optimize the Effectiveness of the IT Organization
    Enterprise - Partner B - Boost the Productivity of the Enterprise
    Market - Innovator C - Enable Business Growth Through Technology

    Low-Maturity Metrics Program

    Trailing indicators measure the outcomes of the activities of your organization. Hopefully, the initiatives and activities are aligned with the organizational goals.

    High-Maturity Metrics Program

    The core CIO objectives align with the organizational goals, and teams define leading indicators that show progress toward those goals. KPIs are reviewed often and adjustments are made to improve performance based on the leading indicators. The results are improved outcomes, greater transparency, and increased predictability.

    The image is a horizontal graphic with multiple text boxes. The first (on the left) is a box that reads Organizational Goals, second a second box nested within it that reads Core CIO Objectives. There is an arrow pointing from this box to the right. The arrow connects to a text box that reads Define leading indicators that show progress toward objectives. To the right of that, there is a title Initiatives & activities, with two boxes beneath it: Processes and Projects. Below this middle section, there is an arrow pointing left, with the text: Adjust behaviours. After this, there is an arrow pointing right, to a box with the title Outcomes, and the image of an unlabelled bar graph.

    Info-Tech’s approach

    Adopt an iterative approach to develop the right KPIs for your dashboard

    Periodically: As appropriate, review the effectiveness of the KPIs and adjust as needed.

    Frequently: At least once per month, but the more frequent, the more agility your organization will have.

    The image shows a series of steps in a process, each connected by an arrow. The process is iterative, so the steps circle back on themselves, and repeat. The process begins with IT Metrics Library, then Choose or build KPIs, then Build Dashboard, then Review KPIs and Create action plan. Review KPIs and Create action plan are steps that the graphic indicates should be repeated, so the arrows are arranged in a circle around these two items. Following that, there is an additional step: Are KPIs and action plans leading to improved results? After this step, we return to the Choose or build KPIs step.

    The Info-Tech difference:

    1. Quickly identify the KPIs that matter to your organization using the IT Metrics Library.
    2. Build a presentable dashboard using the IT Management Dashboard available on the Info-Tech website.
    3. When indicators show underperformance, quickly get them back on track using the suggested research in the IT Metrics Library.
    4. If your organization’s needs are different, define your own custom metrics using the same format as the IT Metrics Library.
    5. Use the action plan tool to keep track of progress

    Info-Tech’s methodology for creating a holistic IT dashboard

    1. Choose the KPIs 2. Build the Dashboard 3. Create the Action Plan
    Phase Steps
    1. Review available KPIs
    2. Select KPIs for your organization
    3. Identify data sources and owners
    1. Understand how to use the IT Management Dashboard
    2. Build and review the KPIs
    1. Prioritize low-performing indicators
    2. Review suggested actions
    3. Develop your action plan
    Phase Outcomes A defined and documented list of the KPIs that will be used to monitor each of the practice areas in your IT mandate A configured dashboard covering all the practice areas and the ability to report performance in a consistent and visible way An action plan for addressing low-performing indicators

    Insight summary

    Mature your IT department by aligning your measures with your organizational goals. Acting early when your KPIs deviate from the goals leads to improved performance.

    Don’t just measure things because you can. Change what you measure as your organization becomes more mature.

    Select what matters to your organization

    Measure things that will resolve pain points or drive you toward your goals.

    Look for indicators that show the health of the practice, not just the results.

    Review KPIs often

    Ease of use will determine the success of your metrics program, so keep it simple to create and review the indicators.

    Take action to improve performance

    If indicators are showing suboptimal performance, develop an action plan to drive the indicator in the right direction.

    Act early and often.

    Measure what your customers value

    Ensure you understand what’s valued and measure whether the value is being produced. Let front-line managers focus on tactical measures and understand how they are linked to value.

    Look for predictive measures

    Determine what action will lead to the desired result and measure if the action is being performed. It’s better to predict outcomes than react to them.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    IT Metrics Library

    Customize the KPIs for your organization using the IT Metrics Library

    IT Metrics Library Action Plan

    Keep track of the actions that are generated from your KPI review

    Key deliverable:

    IT Management Dashboard and Scorecard

    The IT Overall Scorecard gives a holistic view of the performance of each IT function

    Blueprint benefits

    IT Benefits

    • An IT dashboard can help IT departments understand how well they are performing against key indicators.
    • It can allow IT teams to demonstrate to their business partners the areas they are focusing on.
    • Regular review and action planning based on the results will lead to improved performance, efficiency, and effectiveness.
    • Create alignment of IT teams by focusing on common areas of performance.

    Business Benefits

    • Ensure alignment and transparency between the business and IT.
    • Understand the value that IT brings to the operation and strategic initiatives of your organization.
    • Understand the contribution of the IT team to achieving business outcomes.
    • Focus IT on the areas that are important to you by requesting new measures as business needs change.

    Measure the value of this blueprint

    Utilize the existing IT Metrics Library and IT Dashboard tools to quickly kick off your KPI program

    • Developing the metrics your organization should track can be very time consuming. Save approximately 120 hours of effort by choosing from the IT Metrics Library.
    • The need for a simple method to display your KPIs means either developing your own tool or buying one off the shelf. Use the IT Management Dashboard to quickly get your KPI program up and running. Using these tools will save approximately 480 hours.
    • The true value of this initiative comes from using the KPIs to drive performance.

    Keeping track of the number of actions identified and completed is a low overhead measure. Tracking time or money saved is higher overhead but also higher value.

    The image is a screen capture of the document titled Establish Baseline Metrics. It shows a table with the headings: Metric, Current, Goal.

    The image is a chart titled KPI benefits. It includes a legend indicating that blue bars are for Actions identified, purple bars are for Actions completed, and the yellow line is for Time/money saved. The graph shows Q1-Q4, indicating an increase in all areas across the quarters.

    Executive Brief Case Study

    Using data-driven decision making to drive stability and increase value

    Industry: Government Services

    Source: Info-Tech analyst experience

    Challenge

    A newly formed application support team with service desk responsibilities was becoming burned out due to the sheer volume of work landing on their desks. The team was very reactive and was providing poor service due to multiple conflicting priorities.

    To make matters worse, there was a plan to add a major new application to the team’s portfolio.

    Solution

    The team began to measure the types of work they were busy doing and then assessed the value of each type of work.

    The team then problem solved how they could reduce or eliminate their low-value workload.

    This led to tracking how many problems were being resolved and improved capabilities to problem solve effectively.

    Results

    Upon initial data collection, the team was performing 100% reactive workload. Eighteen months later slightly more than 80% of workload was proactive high-value activities.

    The team not only was able to absorb the additional workload of the new application but also identified efficiencies in their interactions with other teams that led to a 100% success rate in the change process and a 92% decrease in resource needs for major incidents.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful."

    Guided Implementation

    "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track."

    Workshop

    "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place."

    Consulting

    "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostic and consistent frameworks are used throughout all four options.

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Phase 1 - Choose the KPIs

    Call #1: Scope dashboard and reporting needs.

    Call #2: Learn how to use the IT Metrics Library to select your metrics.

    Phase 2 – Build the Dashboard

    Call #3: Set up the dashboard.

    Call #4: Capture data and produce the report.

    Phase 3 – Create the Action Plan

    Call #5: Review the data and use the metrics library to determine actions.

    Call #6: Improve the KPIs you measure.

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is between 5 and 8 calls over the course of 2 to 3 months.

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.

    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
    Identify What to Measure Configure the Dashboard Tool Review and Develop the Action Plan Improve Your KPIs Compile Workshop Output
    Activities

    1.1 Identify organizational goals.

    1.2 Identify IT goals and organizational alignment.

    1.3 Identify business pain points.

    2.1 Determine metrics and KPI best practices.

    2.2 Learn how to use the IT Metrics Library.

    2.3 Select the KPIs for your organization.

    2.4 Configure the IT Management Dashboard.

    3.1 Create the scorecard report.

    3.2 Interpret the results of the dashboard.

    3.3 Use the IT Metrics Library to review suggested actions.

    4.1 Develop your action plan.

    4.2 Execute the plan and track progress.

    4.3 Develop new KPIs as your practice matures.

    5.1 Complete the IT Metrics Library documentation.

    5.2 Document decisions and next steps.

    Outcomes 1. List of goals and pain points that KPIs will measure

    1. Definition of KPIs to be used, data sources, and ownership

    2. Configured IT dashboard

    1. Initial IT scorecard report

    2. Action plan with initial actions

    1. Understanding of how to develop new KPIs using the IT Metrics Library

    1. IT Metrics Library documentation

    2. Action plan

    Phase 1

    Choose the KPIs

    Phase 1

    1.1 Review Available KPIs

    1.2 Select KPIs for Your Org.

    1.3 Identify Data Sources and Owners

    Phase 2

    2.1 Understand the IT Management Dashboard

    2.2 Build and Review the KPIs

    Phase 3

    3.1 Prioritize Low-Performing Indicators

    3.2 Review Suggested Actions

    3.3 Develop the Action Plan

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    Reviewing and selecting the KPIs suggested in the IT Metrics Library.

    Identifying the data source for the selected KPI and the owner responsible for data collection.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    Step 1.1

    Review Available KPIs

    Activities

    1.1.1 Download the IT Metrics Library and review the KPIs for each practice area.

    Choose the KPIs

    Step 1.1 – Review Available KPIs

    Step 1.2 – Select KPIs for Your Org.

    Step 1.3 – Identify Data Sources and owners

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    Downloading the IT Metrics Library

    Understanding the content of the tool

    Reviewing the intended goals for each practice area

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    Outcomes of this step

    Downloaded tool ready to select the KPIs for your organization

    Using the IT Metrics Library

    Match the suggested KPIs to the Management and Governance Framework

    The “Practice” and “Process” columns relate to each of the boxes on the Info-Tech Management and Governance Framework. This ensures you are measuring each area that needs to be managed by a typical IT department.

    The image shows a table on the left, and on the right, the Info-Tech Management and Governance Structure. Sections from the Practice and Process columns of the table have arrows emerging from them, pointing to matching sections in the framework.

    Using the IT Metrics Library

    Content for each entry

    KPI - The key performance indicator to review

    CSF - What needs to happen to achieve success for each goal

    Goal - The goal your organization is trying to achieve

    Owner - Who will be accountable to collect and report the data

    Data Source (typical) - Where you plan to get the data that will be used to calculate the KPI

    Baseline/Target - The baseline and target for the KPI

    Rank - Criticality of this goal to the organization's success

    Action - Suggested action if KPI is underperforming

    Blueprint - Available research to address typical underperformance of the KPI

    Practice/Process - Which practice and process the KPI represents

    1.1.1 Download the IT Metrics Library

    Input

    • IT Metrics Library

    Output

    • Ideas for which KPIs would be useful to track for each of the practice areas

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts

    Participants

    • IT senior leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    4 hours

    1. Click the link below to download the IT Metrics Library spreadsheet.
    2. Open the file and select the “Data Entry” tab.
    3. The sheet has suggested KPIs for each of the 9 practice areas and 45 processes listed in the Info-Tech Management and Governance Framework. You can identify this grouping in the “Practice” and “Process” columns.
    4. For each practice area, review the suggested KPIs and their associated goals and discuss as a team which of the KPIs would be useful to track in your organization.

    Download the IT Metrics Library

    Step 1.2

    Select KPIs for Your Organization

    Activities

    1.2.1 Select the KPIs that will drive your organization forward

    1.2.2 Remove unwanted KPIs from the IT Metrics Library

    Choose the KPIs

    Step 1.1 – Review Available KPIs

    Step 1.2 – Select KPIs for Your Org.

    Step 1.3 – Identify Data Sources and Owners

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Selecting the KPIs for your organization and removing unwanted KPIs from IT Metrics Library

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    Outcomes of this step

    A shortlist of selected KPIs

    1.2.1 Select the KPIs that will drive your organization forward

    Input

    • IT Metrics Library

    Output

    • KPIs would be useful to track for each of the practice areas

    Materials

    • IT Metrics Library

    Participants

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    4 hours

    1. Review the suggested KPIs for each practice area and review the goal.
    2. Some suggested KPIs are similar, so make sure the goal is appropriate for your organization.
    3. Pick up to three KPIs per practice.

    1.2.2 Remove unwanted KPIs

    Input

    • IT Metrics Library

    Output

    • KPIs would be useful to track for each of the practice areas

    Materials

    • IT Metrics Library

    Participants

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    0.5 hours

    1. To remove unwanted KPIs from the IT Metric Library Tool, select the unwanted row, right-click on the row, and delete it.
    2. The result should be up to three KPIs per practice area left on the spreadsheet.

    Step 1.3

    Identify data sources and owners

    Activities

    1.3.1 Document the data source

    1.3.2 Document the owner

    1.3.3 Document baseline and target

    Choose the KPIs

    Step 1.1 – Review Available KPIs

    Step 1.2 – Select KPIs for Your Org.

    Step 1.3 – Identify Data Sources and Owners

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    Documenting for each KPI where you plan to get the data, who is accountable to collect and report the data, what the current baseline is (if available), and what the target is

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    Outcomes of this step

    A list of KPIs for your organization with appropriate attributes documented

    1.3 Identify data sources, owners, baseline, and target

    Input

    • IT Metrics Library

    Output

    • Completed IT Metrics Library

    Materials

    • IT Metrics Library

    Participants

    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    2 hours

    1. For each selected KPI, complete the owner, data source, baseline, and target if the information is available.
    2. If the information is not available, document the owner and assign them to complete the other columns.

    Phase 2

    Build the Dashboard

    Phase 1

    1.1 Review Available KPIs

    1.2 Select KPIs for Your Org.

    1.3 Identify Data Sources and Owners

    Phase 2

    2.1 Understand the IT Management Dashboard

    2.2 Build and Review the KPIs

    Phase 3

    3.1 Prioritize Low-Performing Indicators

    3.2 Review Suggested Actions

    3.3 Develop the Action Plan

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    Understanding the IT Management Dashboard

    Configuring the IT Management Dashboard and entering initial measures

    Produce thing IT Scorecard from the IT Management Dashboard

    Interpreting the results

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    Step 2.1

    Understand the IT Management Dashboard

    Activities

    2.1.1 Logging into the IT Management Dashboard

    2.1.2 Understanding the “Overall Scorecard” tab

    2.1.3 Understanding the “My Metrics” tab

    Build the Dashboard

    Step 2.1 – Understand the IT Management Dashboard

    Step 2.2 – Build and review the KPIs

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    Accessing the IT Management Dashboard

    Basic functionality of the tool

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    Outcomes of this step

    Understanding of how to administer the IT Management Dashboard

    2.1.1 Logging into the IT Management Dashboard

    Input

    • Info-Tech membership

    Output

    • Access to the IT Management Dashboard

    Materials

    • Web browser

    Participants

    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    0.5 hours

    1. Using your web browser, access your membership at infotech.com.
    2. Log into your Info-Tech membership account.
    3. Select the “My IT Dashboard” option from the menu (circled in red).
    4. If you cannot gain access to the tool, contact your membership rep.

    The image is a screen capture of the Info-Tech website, with the Login button at the top right of the window circled in red.

    2.1.2 Understanding the “Overall Scorecard” tab

    0.5 hours

    1. Once you select “My IT Dashboard,” you will be in the “Overall Scorecard” tab view.
    2. Scrolling down reveals the data entry form for each of the nine practice areas in the Info-Tech Management and Governance Framework, with each section color-coded for easy identification.
    3. Each of the section headers, KPI names, data sources, and data values can be updated to fit the needs of your organization.
    4. This view is designed to show a holistic view of all areas in IT that are being managed.

    2.1.3 Understanding the “My Metrics” tab

    0.5 hours

    1. On the “My Metrics” tab you can access individual scorecards for each of the nine practice areas.
    2. Below the “My Metrics” tab is each of the nine practice areas for you to select from. Each shows a different subset of KPIs specific to the practice.
    3. The functionality of this view is the same as the overall scorecard. Each title, KPI, description, and actuals are editable to fit your organization’s needs.
    4. This blueprint does not go into detail on this tab, but it is available to be used by practice area leaders in the same way as the overall scorecard.

    Step 2.2

    Build and review the KPIs

    Activities

    2.2.1 Entering the KPI descriptions

    2.2.2 Entering the KPI actuals

    2.2.3 Producing the IT Overall Scorecard

    Build the Dashboard

    Step 2.1 – Understand the IT Management Dashboard

    Step 2.2 – Build and review the KPIs

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    Entering the KPI descriptions

    Entering the actuals for each KPI

    Producing the IT Overall Scorecard

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    Outcomes of this step

    An overall scorecard indicating the selected KPI performance

    2.2.1 Entering the KPI descriptions

    Input

    • Access to the IT Management Dashboard
    • IT Metrics Library with your organization’s KPIs selected

    Output

    • KPI descriptions entered into tool

    Materials

    • Web browser

    Participants

    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    1 hour

    1. Navigate to the IT Management Dashboard as described in section 2.1.1 and scroll down to the practice area you wish to complete.
    2. If needed, modify the section name to match your organization’s needs.
    3. Select “Add another score.”

    2.2.1 Entering the KPI descriptions

    1 hour

    1. Select if your metric is a custom metric or a standard metric available from one of the Info-Tech diagnostic tools.
    2. Enter the metric name you selected from the IT Metrics Library.
    3. Select the value type.
    4. Select the “Add Metric” button.
    5. The descriptions only need to be entered when they change.

    Example of a custom metric

    The image is a screen capture of the Add New Metric function. The metric type selected is Custom metric, and the metric name is Employee Engagement. There is a green Add Metric button, which is circled in red.

    Example of a standard metric

    The image is a screen capture of the Add New Metric function. The metric type selected is Standard Metric. The green Add Metric button at the bottom is circled in red.

    2.2.2 Entering the KPI actuals

    Input

    • Actual data from each data source identified

    Output

    • Actuals recorded in tool

    Materials

    • Web browser

    Participants

    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    1 hour

    1. Select the period you wish to create a scorecard for by selecting “Add New Period” or choosing one from the drop-down list.
    2. For each KPI on your dashboard, collect the data from the data source and enter the actuals.
    3. Select the check mark (circled) to save the data for the period.

    The image is a screen capture of the My Overall Scorecard Metrics section, with a button at the bottom that reads Add New Period circled in red

    The image has the text People and Resources at the top. It shows data for the KPI, and there is a check mark circled in red.

    2.2.3 Producing the IT Overall Scorecard

    Input

    • Completed IT Overall Scorecard data collection

    Output

    • IT Overall Scorecard

    Materials

    • Web browser

    Participants

    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    0.5 hours

    1. Select the period you wish to create a scorecard for by selecting from the drop-down list.
    2. Click the “Download as PDF” button to produce the scorecard.
    3. Once the PDF is produced it is ready for review or distribution.

    Phase 3

    Create the Action Plan

    Phase 1

    1.1 Review Available KPIs

    1.2 Select KPIs for Your Org.

    1.3 Identify Data Sources and Owners

    Phase 2

    2.1 Understand the IT Management Dashboard

    2.2 Build and Review the KPIs

    Phase 3

    3.1 Prioritize Low-Performing Indicators

    3.2 Review Suggested Actions

    3.3 Develop the Action Plan

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    Prioritizing low-performing indicators

    Using the IT Metrics Library to review suggested actions

    Developing your team’s action plan to improve performance

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    Step 3.1

    Prioritize low-performing indicators

    Activities

    3.1.1 Determine criteria for prioritization

    3.1.2 Identify low-performing indicators

    3.1.3 Prioritize low-performing indicators

    Create the action plan

    Step 3.1 – Prioritize low-performing indicators

    Step 3.2 – Review suggested actions

    Step 3.3 – Develop the action plan

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    Determining the criteria for prioritization of low-performing indicators

    Identifying low-performing indicators

    Prioritizing the low-performing indicators

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    Outcomes of this step

    A prioritized list of low-performing indicators that need remediation

    3.1.1 Determine criteria for prioritization

    Often when metrics programs are established, there are multiple KPIs that are not performing at the desired level. It’s easy to expect the team to fix all the low-performing indicators, but often teams are stretched and have conflicting priorities.

    Therefore it’s important to spend some time to prioritize which of your indicators are most critical to the success of your business.

    Also consider, if one area is performing well and others have multiple poor indicators, how do you give the right support to optimize the results?

    Lastly, is it better to score slightly lower on multiple measures or perfect on most but failing badly on one or two?

    3.1.1 Determine criteria for prioritization

    Input

    • Business goals and objectives
    • IT goals and objectives
    • IT organizational structure

    Output

    • Documented scorecard remediation prioritization criteria

    Materials

    • Whiteboard or flip charts

    Participants

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    1 hour

    1. Identify any KPIs that are critical and cannot fail without high impact to your organization.
    2. Identify any KPIs that cannot fail for an extended period and document the time period.
    3. Rank the KPIs from most critical to least critical in the IT Metrics Library.
    4. Look at the owner accountable for the performance of each KPI. If there are any large groups, reassess the ownership or rank.
    5. Periodically review the criteria to see if they’re aligned with meeting current business goals.

    3.1.2 Identify low-performing indicators

    Input

    • Overall scorecard
    • Overall scorecard (previous period)
    • IT Metrics Library

    Output

    • List of low-performing indicators that need remediation
    • Planned actions to improve performance

    Materials

    • Whiteboard or flip charts

    Participants

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    1 hour

    1. Review the overall scorecard for the current period. List any KPIs that are not meeting the target for the current month in the “Action Plan” tab of the IT Metrics Library.
    2. Compare current month to previous month. List any KPIs that are moving away from the long-term target documented in the tool IT Metrics Library.
    3. Revise the target in the IT Metrics Library as business needs change.

    3.1.3 Prioritize low-performing indicators

    Input

    • IT Metrics Library

    Output

    • Prioritized list of planned actions for low-performing indicators

    Materials

    • IT Metrics Library

    Participants

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators
    • Task owners

    1 hour

    1. Look through the list of new and outstanding planned actions in the “Action Plan” tab of the IT Metrics Library, review progress, and prioritize outstanding items.
    2. Compare the list that needs remediation with the rank in the data entry tab.
    3. Adjust the priority of the outstanding and new actions to reflect the business needs.

    Step 3.2

    Review suggested actions

    Activities

    3.2.1 Review suggested actions in the IT Metrics Library

    Create the Action Plan

    Step 3.1 – Prioritize low-performing indicators

    Step 3.2 – Review suggested actions

    Step 3.3 – Develop the action plan

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    Reviewing the suggested actions in the IT Metrics Library

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    Outcomes of this step

    An idea of possible suggested actions

    Take Action

    Knowing where you are underperforming is only half the battle. You need to act!

    • So far you have identified which indicators will tell you whether or not your team is performing and which indicators are most critical to your business success.
    • Knowing is the first step, but things will not improve without some kind of action.
    • Sometimes the action needed to course-correct is small and simple, but sometimes it is complicated and may take a long time.
    • Utilize the diverse ideas of your team to find solutions to underperforming indicators.
    • If you don’t have a viable simple solution, leverage the IT Metrics Library, which suggests high-level action needed to improve each indicator. If you need additional information, use your Info-Tech membership to review the recommended research.

    3.2.1 Review suggested actions in the IT Metrics Library

    Input

    • IT Metrics Library

    Output

    • Suggested actions

    Materials

    • IT Metrics Library

    Participants

    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators
    • Task owners

    0.5 hours

    1. For each of your low-performing indicators, review the suggested action and related research in the IT Metrics Library.

    Step 3.3

    Develop the action plan

    Activities

    3.3.1 Document planned actions

    3.3.2 Assign ownership of actions

    3.3.3 Determine timeline of actions

    3.3.4 Review past action status

    Create the action plan

    Step 3.1 – Prioritize low- performing indicators

    Step 3.2 – Review suggested actions

    Step 3.3 – Develop the action plan

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    Using the action plan tool to document the expected actions for low-performing indicators

    Assigning an owner and expected due date for the action

    Reviewing past action status for accountability

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    Outcomes of this step

    An action plan to invoke improved performance

    3.3.1 Document planned actions

    Input

    • IT Metrics Library

    Output

    • Planned actions

    Materials

    • IT Metrics Library

    Participants

    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators
    • Task owners

    1 hour

    1. Decide on the action you plan to take to bring the indicator in line with expected performance and document the planned action in the “Action Plan” tab of the IT Metrics Library.

    Info-Tech Insight

    For larger initiatives try to break the task down to what is likely manageable before the next review. Seeing progress can motivate continued action.

    3.3.2 Assign ownership of actions

    Input

    • IT Metrics Library

    Output

    • Identified owners for each action

    Materials

    • IT Metrics Library

    Participants

    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators
    • Task owners

    0.5 hours

    1. For each unassigned task, assign clear ownership for completion of the task.
    2. The task owner should be the person accountable for the task.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Assigning clear ownership can promote accountability for progress.

    3.3.3 Determine timeline of actions

    Input

    • IT Metrics Library

    Output

    • Expected timeline for each action

    Materials

    • IT Metrics Library

    Participants

    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators
    • Task owners

    0.5 hours

    1. For each task, agree on an estimated target date for completion.

    Info-Tech Insight

    If the target completion date is too far in the future, break the task into manageable chunks.

    3.3.4 Review past action status

    Input

    • IT Metrics Library

    Output

    • Complete action plan for increased performance

    Materials

    • IT Metrics Library

    Participants

    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators
    • Task owners

    0.5 hours

    1. For each task, review the progress since last review.
    2. If desired progress is not being made, adjust your plan based on your organizational constraints.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Seek to understand the reasons that tasks are not being completed and problem solve for creative solutions to improve performance.

    Measure the value of your KPI program

    KPIs only produce value if they lead to action

    • Tracking the performance of key indicators is the first step, but value only comes from taking action based on this information.
    • Keep track of the number of action items that come out of your KPI review and how many are completed.
    • If possible, keep track of the time or money saved through completing the action items.

    Keeping track of the number of actions identified and completed is a low overhead measure.

    Tracking time or money saved is higher overhead but also higher value.

    The image is a chart titled KPI benefits. It includes a legend indicating that blue bars are for Actions identified, purple bars are for Actions completed, and the yellow line is for Time/money saved. The graph shows Q1-Q4, indicating an increase in all areas across the quarters.

    Establish Baseline Metrics

    Baseline metrics will be improved through:

    1. Identifying actions needed to remediate poor-performing KPIs
    2. Associating time and/or money savings as a result of actions taken
    Metric Current Goal
    Number of actions identified per month as a result of KPI review 0 TBD
    $ saved through actions taken due to KPI review 0 TBD
    Time saved through actions taken due to KPI review 0 TBD

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Problem Solved

    Through this project we have identified typical key performance indicators that are important to your organization’s effective management of IT.

    You’ve populated the IT Management Dashboard as a simple method to display the results of your selected KPIs.

    You’ve also established a regular review process for your KPIs and have a method to track the actions that are needed to improve performance as a result of the KPI review. This should allow you to hold individuals accountable for improvement efforts.

    You can also measure the effectiveness of your KPI program by tracking how many actions are identified as a result of the review. Ideally you can also track the money and time savings.

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

    Contact your account representative for more information.

    workshops@infotech.com

    1-888-670-8889

    Additional Support

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech Workshop.

    Contact your account representative for more information.

    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech Workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.

    Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    Select the KPIs for your organization

    Examine the benefits of the KPIs suggested in the IT Metrics Library and help selecting those that will drive performance for your maturity level.

    Build an action plan

    Discuss options for identifying and executing actions that result from your KPI review. Determine how to set up the discipline needed to make the most of your KPI review program.

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Valence Howden

    Principal Research Director, CIO – Service Management Info-Tech Research Group

    • Valence has extensive experience in helping organizations be successful through optimizing how they govern themselves, how they design and execute strategies, and how they drive service excellence in all work.

    Tracy-Lynn Reid

    Practice Lead, CIO – People & Leadership Info-Tech Research Group

    • Tracy-Lynn covers key topics related to People & Leadership within an information technology context.

    Fred Chagnon

    Practice Lead, Infrastructure & Operations Info-Tech Research Group

    • Fred brings extensive practical experience in all aspects of enterprise IT Infrastructure, including IP networks, server hardware, operating systems, storage, databases, middleware, virtualization and security.

    Aaron Shum

    Practice Lead, Security, Risk & Compliance Info-Tech Research Group

    • With 20+ years of experience across IT, InfoSec, and Data Privacy, Aaron currently specializes in helping organizations implement comprehensive information security and cybersecurity programs as well as comply with data privacy regulations.

    Cole Cioran

    Practice Lead, Applications and Agile Development Info-Tech Research Group

    • Over the past twenty-five years, Cole has developed software; designed data, infrastructure, and software solutions; defined systems and enterprise architectures; delivered enterprise-wide programs; and managed software development, infrastructure, and business systems analysis practices.

    Barry Cousins

    Practice Lead, Applications – Project and Portfolio Mgmt. Info-Tech Research Group

    • Barry specializes in Project Portfolio Management, Help/Service Desk, and Telephony/Unified Communications. He brings an extensive background in technology, IT management, and business leadership.

    Jack Hakimian

    Vice President, Applications Info-Tech Research Group

    • Jack has close to 25 years of Technology and Management Consulting experience. He has served multi-billion-dollar organizations in multiple industries, including Financial Services and Telecommunications. Jack also served several large public sector institutions.

    Vivek Mehta

    Research Director, CIO Info-Tech Research Group

    • Vivek publishes on topics related to digital transformation and innovation. He is the author of research on Design a Customer-Centric Digital Operating Model and Create Your Digital Strategy as well as numerous keynotes and articles on digital transformation.

    Carlos Sanchez

    Practice Lead, Enterprise Applications Info-Tech Research Group

    • Carlos has a breadth of knowledge in enterprise applications strategy, planning, and execution.

    Andy Neill

    Practice Lead, Enterprise Architecture, Data & BI Info-Tech Research Group

    • Andy has extensive experience in managing technical teams, information architecture, data modeling, and enterprise data strategy.

    Michael Fahey

    Executive Counselor Info-Tech Research Group

    • As an Executive Counselor, Mike applies his decades of business experience and leadership, along with Info-Tech Research Group’s resources, to assist CIOs in delivering outstanding business results.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Develop Meaningful Service Metrics to Ensure Business and User Satisfaction

    • Reinforce service orientation in your IT organization by ensuring your IT metrics generate value-driven resource behavior.

    Use Applications Metrics That Matter

    • It all starts with quality and customer satisfaction.

    Take Control of Infrastructure Metrics

    • Master the metrics maze to help make decisions, manage costs, and plan for change.

    Bibliography

    Bach, Nancy. “How Often Should You Measure Your Organization's KPIs?” EON, 26 June 2018. Accessed Jan. 2020.

    “The Benefits of Tracking KPIs – Both Individually and for a Team.” Hoopla, 30 Jan. 2017. Accessed Jan. 2020.

    Chepul, Tiffany. “Top 22 KPI Examples for Technology Companies.” Rhythm Systems, Jan. 2020. Accessed Jan. 2020.

    Cooper, Larry. “CSF's, KPI's, Metrics, Outcomes and Benefits” itSM Solutions. 5 Feb. 2010. Accessed Jan 2020.

    “CUC Report on the implementation of Key Performance Indicators: case study experience.” Committee of University Chairs, June 2008. Accessed Jan 2020.

    Harris, Michael, and Bill Tayler. “Don’t Let Metrics Undermine Your Business.” HBR, Sep.–Oct 2019. Accessed Jan. 2020.

    Hatari, Tim. “The Importance of a Strong KPI Dashboard.” TMD Coaching. 27 Dec. 2018. Accessed Jan. 2020.

    Roy, Mayu, and Marian Carter. “The Right KPIs, Metrics for High-performing, Cost-saving Space Management.” CFI, 2013. Accessed Jan 2020.

    Schrage, Michael, and David Kiron. “Leading With Next-Generation Key Performance Indicators.” MIT Sloan Management Review, 26 June 2018. Accessed Jan. 2020.

    Setijono, Djoko, and Jens J. Dahlgaard. “Customer value as a key performance indicator (KPI) and a key improvement indicator (KII)” Emerald Insight, 5 June 2007. Accessed Jan 2020.

    Skinner, Ted. “Balanced Scorecard KPI Examples: Comprehensive List of 183 KPI Examples for a Balanced Scorecard KPI Dashboard (Updated for 2020).” Rhythm Systems, Jan. 2020. Accessed Jan 2020.

    Wishart, Jessica. “5 Reasons Why You Need The Right KPIs in 2020” Rhythm Systems, 1 Feb. 2020. Accessed Jan. 2020.

    Optimize the IT Operations Center

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}449|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Operations Management
    • Parent Category Link: /i-and-o-process-management
    • Your team’s time is burned up by incident response.
    • Manual repetitive work uses up expensive resources.
    • You don’t have the visibility to ensure the availability the business demands.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Sell the project to the business.
    • Leverage the Operations Center to improve IT Operations.

    Impact and Result

    • Clarify lines of accountability and metrics for success.
    • Implement targeted initiatives and track key metrics for continual improvement.

    Optimize the IT Operations Center Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should Optimize the IT Operations Center, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Lightning Phase: Pluck Low-Hanging Fruit for Quick Wins

    Get quick wins to demonstrate early value for investments in IT Operations.

    • Optimize the IT Operations Center – Lightning Phase: Pluck Low-Hanging Fruit for Quick Wins

    2. Get buy-in

    Get buy-in from business stakeholders by speaking their language.

    • Optimize the IT Operations Center – Phase 1: Get Buy-In
    • IT Operations Center Prerequisites Assessment Tool
    • IT Operations Center Stakeholder Buy-In Presentation
    • IT Operations Center Continual Improvement Tracker

    3. Define accountability and metrics

    Formalize process and task accountability and develop targeted metrics.

    • Optimize the IT Operations Center – Phase 2: Define Accountability and Metrics
    • IT Operations Center RACI Charts Template

    4. Assess gaps and prioritize initiatives

    Identify pain points and determine the top solutions.

    • Optimize the IT Operations Center – Phase 3: Assess Gaps and Prioritize Initiatives
    • IT Operations Center Gap and Initiative Tracker
    • IT Operations Center Initiative Prioritization Tool

    5. Launch initiatives and track metrics

    Lay the foundation for implementation and continual improvement.

    • Optimize the IT Operations Center – Phase 4: Launch Initiatives and Track Metrics
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Optimize the IT Operations Center

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Check Foundation

    The Purpose

    Ensure base maturity in IT Operations processes.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Verify that foundation is in place to proceed with Operations Center project.

    Activities

    1.1 Evaluate base maturity.

    Outputs

    IT Operations Center Prerequisites Assessment Tool

    2 Define Accountabilities

    The Purpose

    Define accountabilities for Operations processes and tasks.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Documented accountabilities.

    Activities

    2.1 Pluck low-hanging fruit for quick wins.

    2.2 Complete process RACI.

    2.3 Complete task RACI.

    Outputs

    Project plan

    Process RACI

    Task RACI

    3 Map the Challenge

    The Purpose

    Define metrics and identify accountabilities and gaps.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    List of initiatives to address pain points.

    Activities

    3.1 Define metrics.

    3.2 Define accountabilities.

    3.3 Identify gaps.

    Outputs

    IT Operations Center Gap and Initiative Tracker

    4 Build Action Plan

    The Purpose

    Develop an action plan to boost KPIs.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Action plan and success criteria.

    Activities

    4.1 Prioritize initiatives.

    Outputs

    IT Operations Center Initiative Prioritization Tool

    5 Map Out Implementation

    The Purpose

    Build an implementation plan for continual improvement.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Continual improvement against identified metrics and KPIs.

    Activities

    5.1 Build implementation plan.

    Outputs

    IT Operations Center Continual Improvement Tracker

    Further reading

    Optimize the IT Operations Center

    Stop burning budget on non-value-adding activities.

    ANALYST PERSPECTIVE

    The Network Operations Center is not in Kansas anymore.

    "The old-school Network Operations Center of the telecom world was heavily peopled and reactionary. Now, the IT Operations Center is about more than network monitoring. An effective Operations Center provides visibility across the entire stack, generates actionable alerts, resolves a host of different incidents, and drives continual improvement in the delivery of high-quality services.
    IT’s traditional siloed approach cannot provide the value the business demands. The modern Operations Center breaks down these silos for the end-to-end view required for a service-focused approach."

    Derek Shank,
    Research Analyst, Infrastructure & Operations
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Our understanding of the problem

    This Research Is Designed For:

    • IT Operations Managers
    • IT Infrastructure Managers
    • CIOs

    This Research Will Help You:

    • Improve reliability of services.
    • Reduce the cost of incident response.
    • Reduce the cost of manual repetitive work (MRW).

    This Research Will Also Assist

    • Business Analysts
    • Project Managers
    • Business Relationship Managers

    This Research Will Help Them

    • Develop appropriate non-functional requirements.
    • Integrate non-functional requirements into solution design and project implementation.

    Executive Summary

    Situation

    • Your team’s time is burned up by incident response.
    • MRW burns up expensive resources.
    • You don’t have the visibility to ensure the availability the business demands.

    Complication

    • The increasing complexity of technology has resulted in siloed teams of specialists.
    • The business views IT Operations as a cost center and doesn’t want to provide resources to support improvement initiatives.

    Resolution

    • Pluck low-hanging fruit for quick wins.
    • Obtain buy-in from business stakeholders by speaking their language.
    • Clarify lines of accountability and metrics for success.
    • Implement targeted initiatives and track key metrics for continual improvement.

    Info-Tech Insight

    1. Sell the project to the business. Your first job is a sales job because executive sponsorship is key to project success.
    2. Worship the holy trinity of metrics: impact of downtime, cost of incident response, and time spent on manual repetitive work (MRW).
    3. Invest in order to profit. Improving the Operations Center takes time and money. Expect short-term pain to realize long-term gain.

    The role of the Network Operations Center has changed

    • The old approach was technology siloed and the Network Operations Center (NOC) only cared about the network.
    • The modern Operations Center is about ensuring high availability of end-user services, and requires cross-functional expertise and visibility across all the layers of the technology stack.
    A pie chart is depicted. The data displayed on the chart, in decreasing order of size, include: Applications; Servers; LAN; WAN; Security; Storage. Source: Metzler, n.d.

    Most organizations lack adequate visibility

    • The rise of hybrid cloud has made environments more complex, not less.
    • The increasing complexity makes monitoring and incident response more difficult than ever.
    • Only 31% of organizations use advanced monitoring beyond what is offered by cloud providers.
    • 69% perform no monitoring, basic monitoring, or rely entirely on the cloud provider’s monitoring tools.
    A Pie chart is depicted. Two data are represented on the chart. The first, representing 69% of the chart, is: Using no monitoring, basic monitoring, or relying only on the cloud vendor's monitoring. the second, representing 31% of the chart, is Using advanced monitoring beyond what cloud vendors provide. Source: InterOp ITX, 2018

    Siloed service level agreements cannot ensure availability

    You can meet high service level agreements (SLAs) for functional silos, but still miss the mark for service availability. The business just wants things to work!

    this image contains Info-Tech's SLA-compliance rating chart, which displays the categories: Available, behaving as expected; Slow/degraded; and Unavailable, for each of: Webserver; Database; Storage; Network; Application; and, Business Service

    The cost of downtime is massive

    Increasing reliance on IT makes downtime hurt more than ever.
    98% of enterprises lose $100,000+.
    81% of enterprises lose $300,000+ per hour of downtime.

    This is a bar graph, showing the cost per hour of downtime, against the percentage of enterprises.

    Source: ITIC, 2016

    IT is asked to do more with less

    Most IT budgets are staying flat or shrinking.

    57% of IT departments expect their budget to stay flat or to shrink from 2018 to 2019.

    This image contains a pie chart with two data, one is labeled: Increase; representing 43% of the chart. The other datum is labeled: Shrink or stay flat, and represents 57% of the chart.

    Unify and streamline IT Operations

    A well-run Operations Center ensures high availability at reasonable cost. Improving your Operations Center results in:

    • Higher availability
    • Increased reliability
    • Improved project capacity
    • Higher business satisfaction

    Measure success with the holy trinity of metrics

    Focus on reducing downtime, cost of incident response, and MRW.

    This image contains a Funnel Chart showing the inputs: Downtime; Cost of Incident Response; MRW; and the output: Reduce for continual improvement

    Start from the top and employ a targeted approach

    Analyze data to get buy-in from stakeholders, and use our tools and templates to follow the process for continual improvement in IT Operations.

    This image depicts a cycle, which includes: Data analysis; Executive Sponsorship; Success Criteria; Gap Assessment; Initiatives; Tracking & Measurement

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track."

    Workshop

    "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place."

    Consulting

    "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Optimize the IT Operations Center – project overview

    Launch the Project

    Identify Enterprise Services

    Identify Line of Business Services

    Complete Service Definitions

    Best-Practice Toolkit

    🗲 Pluck Low-Hanging Fruit for Quick Wins

    1.1 Ensure Base Maturity Is in Place

    1.2 Make the Case

    2.1 Define Accountabilities

    2.2 Define Metrics

    3.1 Assess Gaps

    3.2 Plan Initiatives

    4.1 Lay Foundation

    4.2 Launch and Measure

    Guided Implementations

    Discuss current state.

    Review stakeholder presentation.

    Review RACIs.

    Review metrics.

    Discuss gaps.

    Discuss initiatives.

    Review plan and metric schedule.

    Onsite Workshop Module 1:

    Clear understanding of project objectives and support obtained from the business.

    Module 2:

    Enterprise services defined and categorized.

    Module 3:

    LOB services defined based on user perspective.

    Module 4:

    Service record designed according to how IT wishes to communicate to the business.

    Phase 1 Results:

    Stakeholder presentation

    Phase 2 Results:
    • RACIs
    • Metrics
    Phase 3 Results:
    • Gaps list
    • Prioritized list of initiatives
    Phase 4 Results:
    • Implementation plan
    • Continual improvement tracker

    Workshop overview

    Contact your account representative or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Pre-Workshop Workshop Day 1 Workshop Day 2 Workshop Day 3 Workshop Day 4
    Activities

    Check Foundation

    Define Accountabilities

    Map the Challenge

    Build Action Plan

    Map Out Implementation

    1.1 Ensure base maturity.

    🗲 Pluck low-hanging fruit for quick wins.

    2.1 Complete process RACI.

    2.2 Complete task RACI.

    3.1 Define metrics.

    3.2 Define accountabilities.

    3.2 Identify gaps.

    4.1 Prioritize initiatives.

    5.1 Build implementation plan.

    Deliverables
    1. IT Operations Center Prerequisites Assessment Tool
    1. IT Operations Center RACI Charts Template
    1. IT Operations Center Gap and Initiative Tracker
    1. IT Operations Center Initiative Prioritization Tool
    1. IT Operations Center Continual Improvement Tracker

    PHASE 🗲

    Pluck Low-Hanging Fruit for Quick Wins

    Optimize the IT Operations Center

    Conduct a ticket-trend analysis

    Generate reports on tickets from your IT service management (ITSM) tool. Look for areas that consume the most resources, such as:

    • Recurring tickets.
    • Tickets that have taken a long time to resolve.
    • Tickets that could have been resolved at a lower tier.
    • Tickets that were unnecessarily or improperly escalated.

    Identify issues

    Analyze the tickets:

    • Look for recurring tickets that may indicate underlying problems.
    • Ask tier 2 and 3 technicians to flag tickets that could have been resolved at a lower tier.
    • Identify painful and/or time consuming service requests.
    • Flag any manual repetitive work.

    Write the issues on a whiteboard.

    Oil & Gas IT reduces manual repetitive maintenance work

    CASE STUDY
    Industry Oil & Gas
    Source Interview

    Challenge

    The company used a webserver to collect data from field stations for analytics. The server’s version did not clear its cache – it filled up its own memory and would not overwrite, so it would just lock up and have to be rebooted manually.

    Solution

    The team found out that the volumes and units of data would cause the memory to fill at a certain time of the month. They wrote a script to reboot the machine and set up a planned outage during the appropriate weekend each month.

    Results

    The team never had to do manual reboots again – though they did have to tweak their reboot script not to rely on their calendar, after a shift in production broke the pattern between memory consumption and the calendar.

    Rank the issues

    🗲.1.1 10 minutes

    1. Assign each participant five sticky dots to use for voting.
    2. Have each participant place any number of dots beside the issue(s) of their choice.
    3. Count the dots and rank the top three most important issues.

    INPUT

    • List of issues

    OUTPUT

    • Top three issues

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky dots

    Participants

    • Operations Manager
    • Infrastructure Manager
    • I&O team members

    Brainstorm solutions

    🗲.1.2 10 minutes

    1. Write the three issues at the top of a whiteboard, each at the head of its own column.
    2. Focusing on one issue at a time, brainstorm potential solutions for each issue. Have one person write all the proposed solutions on the board beneath the issue.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Do not censor or evaluate the proposed solutions at this time. During brainstorming, focus on coming up with as many potential solutions as possible, no matter how infeasible or outlandish.

    INPUT

    • Top three issues

    OUTPUT

    • Potential solutions

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Operations Manager
    • Infrastructure Manager
    • I&O team members

    Evaluate and rank potential solutions

    🗲.1.3 30 minutes

    1. Score the solutions from 1-5 on each of the two dimensions:
    • Attainability
    • Probable efficacy
  • Identify the top scoring solution for each issue. In the event of a tie, vote to determine the winner.
  • Info-Tech Insight

    Quick wins are the best of both worlds. To get a quick win, pick a solution that is both readily attainable and likely to have high impact.

    INPUT

    • Potential solutions

    OUTPUT

    • Ranked list of solutions

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Operations Manager
    • Infrastructure Manager
    • I&O team members

    Develop metrics to measure the effectiveness of solutions

    You should now have a top potential solution for each pain point.

    For each pain point and proposed solution, identify the metric that would indicate whether the solution had been effective or not. For example:

    • Pain point: Too many unnecessary escalations for SharePoint issues.
    • Solution: Train tier 1 staff to resolve SharePoint tickets.
    • Metric: % of SharePoint tickets resolved at tier 1.

    Design solutions

    • Some solutions explain themselves. E.g., hire an extra service desk person.
    • Others require more planning and design, as they involve a bespoke solution. E.g., improve asset management process or automate onboarding of new users.
    • For the solutions that require planning, take the time to design each solution fully before rushing to implement it.

    Build solutions

    • Build any of the solutions that require building. For example, any scripting for automations requires the writing of those scripts, and any automated ticket routing requires configuration of your ITSM tool.
    • Part of the build phase for many solutions should also involve designing the tests of those solutions.

    Test solutions – refine and iterate

    • Think about the expected outcome and results of the solutions that require testing.
    • Test each solution under production-like circumstances to see if the results and behavior are as expected.
    • Refine and iterate upon the solutions as necessary, and test again.

    Implement solutions and measure results

    • Before implementing each solution, take a baseline measurement of the metric that will measure success.
    • Implement the solutions using your change management process.
    • After implementation, measure the success of the solution using the appropriate metric.
    • Document the results and judge whether the solution has been effective.

    Use the top result as a case study to obtain buy-in

    Your most effective solution will make a great case study.

    Write up the results and input the case study into the IT Operations Center Stakeholder Buy-In Presentation.

    This image contains a screenshot of info-tech's default format for presenting case studies.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts

    this is a picture of an Info-Tech Analyst
    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.
    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:
    🗲.1.2 This image contains a screenshot from section 🗲.1.2 of this blueprint.

    Identify issues

    Look for areas that aren’t working optimally.

    🗲.1.3 this image contains a screenshot from section 🗲.1.3 of this blueprint.

    Evaluate and rank potential solutions

    Sort the wheat from the chaff and plan for quick wins.

    PHASE 1

    Get Buy-In

    Optimize the IT Operations Center

    Step 1.1: Ensure Base Maturity Is in Place

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Assess maturity of base IT Operations processes.

    Outcomes of this step

    • Completed IT Operations Center Prerequisites Assessment Tool

    Base processes underpin the Operations Center

    • Before you optimize your Operations Center, you should have foundational ITSM processes in place: service desk, and incident, problem, and change management.
    • Attempting to optimize Operations before it rests on a solid foundation can only lead to frustration.

    IT Operations Center

    • Service Desk
    • Incident Management
    • Problem Management
    • Change Management

    Info-Tech Insight

    ITIL isn’t dead. New technology such as cloud solutions and advanced monitoring tools have transformed how ITSM processes are implemented, but have not obviated them.

    Assess maturity of prerequisite processes

    1.1.1 IT Operations Center Prerequisites Assessment Tool

    • Don’t try to prematurely optimize your Operations Center.
    • Before undertaking this project, you should already have a base level of maturity in the four foundational IT Operations processes.
    • Complete the IT Operations Center Prerequisites Assessment Tool to assess your current level in service desk, incident management, problem management, and change management.
    this image contains a screenshot from Info-Tech's IT Operations Center Prerequisite Assessment

    Make targeted improvements on prerequisite processes if necessary

    If there are deficiencies in any of your foundational processes, take the time to remedy those first before proceeding with Optimize the IT Operations Center. See Info-Tech’s other blueprints:

    Standardize the Service Desk

    Strengthen your service desk to build a strong ITSM foundation.

    Incident and Problem Management

    Don’t let persistent problems govern your department.

    Optimize Change Management

    Turn and face the change with a right-sized change management process.

    Step 1.2: Make the Case

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Estimate the impact of downtime for top five applications.
    • Estimate the cost of incident response.
    • Estimate the cost of MRW.
    • Set success metrics and estimate the ROI of the Operations Center project.
    • IT Operations Center Stakeholder Buy-In Presentation

    Obtaining buy-in is critical

    Buy-in from top-level stakeholders is critical to the success of the project.

    Before jumping into your initiatives, take the time to make the case and bring the business on board.

    Factors that “prevent us from improving the NOC”

    This image contains a graph of factors that prevent us from improving the NOC. In decreasing order, they include: Lack of strategic guidance from our vendors; The unwillingness of our management to accept new risk; Lack of adequate software tools; Our internal processes; Lack of management vision; Lack of funding; and Lack of personnel resources. There is a red circle drawn around the last three entries, with the words: Getting Buy-in Removes the Top Three Roadblocks to Improvement!. Source: Metzier, n.d

    List your top five applications

    List your top five applications for business criticality.

    Don’t agonize over decisions at this point.

    Generally, the top applications will be customer facing, end-user facing for the most critical business units, or critical for health and safety.

    Estimate impact of downtime

    • Come up with a rough, back-of-the-napkin estimate of the hourly cost of downtime for each application.
    • Complete page two of the IT Operations Center Stakeholder Buy-In Presentation.
    • Estimate loss of revenue per hour, loss of productivity per hour, and IT cost per incident resolution hour.
    • Pull a report on incident hours/outages in the past year from your ITSM tool. Multiply the total cost per incident hour by the incident hours per year to determine the current cost per year of service disruptions for each service.
    • Add up the cost for each of the top five services.
    • Now you can show the business a hard value number that quantifies your availability issues.

    Estimate salary cost of non-value-adding work

    Complete page three of the IT Operations Center Stakeholder Buy-In Presentation.

    • Estimate annual wage cost of incident response: multiply incident response hours per year (take from your ITSM tool) by the average hourly wage of incident responders.
    • Estimate annual cost of MRW: multiply MRW hours per year (take from ITSM tool or from time-keeping tool, or use best guess based on talking to staff members) by the average hourly wage of IT staff performing MRW.
    • Add the two numbers together to calculate the non-value-adding IT salary cost per year.
    • Express the previous number as a percentage of total IT salary. Everything that is not incident response or MRW is value-adding work.

    Now you have the holy trinity of metrics: set some targets

    The holy trinity of metrics:

    • Cost of downtime
    • % of salary on incident response
    • % of salary on MRW

    You want to reduce the above numbers. Set some back-of-the-napkin targets for percentage reductions for each of these areas. These are high-level metrics that business stakeholders will care about.

    Take your best guess at targets. Higher maturity organizations will have less potential for reduction from a percentage point of view (eventually you hit diminishing returns), while organizations just beginning to optimize their Operations Center have the potential for huge gains.

    Calculate the potential gains of targets

    Complete page five of the IT Operations Center Stakeholder Buy-In Presentation.

    • Multiply the targeted/estimated % reductions of the costs by your current costs to determine the potential savings/benefits.
    • Do a back-of-the napkin estimate of the cost of the Operations Center improvement project. Use reasonable numbers for cost of personnel time and cost of tools, and be sure to include ongoing personnel time costs – your time isn’t free and continual improvement takes work and effort.
    • Calculate the ROI.

    Fill out the case study

    • Complete page six of the IT Operations Center Stakeholder Buy-In Presentation. If you completed the lightning phase, use the results of your own quick win project(s) as an example of feasibility.
    • If you did not complete the lightning phase, delete this slide, or use an example of what other organizations have achieved to demonstrate feasibility.
    This image contains a screenshot of info-tech's default format for presenting case studies.

    Present to stakeholders

    • Deliver the presentation to key stakeholders.
    • Focus on the high-level story that the current state is costing real dollars and wages, and that these losses can be minimized through process improvements.
    • Be up front that many of the numbers are based on estimates, but be prepared to defend the reasonableness of the estimates.

    Gain buy-in and identify project sponsor

    • If the business is on board with the project, determine one person to be the executive sponsor for the project. This person should have a strong desire to see the project succeed, and should have some skin in the game.

    Formalize communication with the project sponsor

    • Establish how you will communicate with the sponsor throughout the project (e.g. weekly or monthly e-mail updates, bi-weekly meetings).
    • Set up a regular/recurring cadence and stick to it, so it can be put on auto-pilot. Be clear about who is responsible for initiating communication and sticking to the reporting schedule.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Tailor communication to the sponsor. The project sponsor is not the project manager. The sponsor’s role is to drive the project forward by allocating appropriate resources and demonstrating highly visible support to the broader organization. The sponsor should be kept in the loop, but not bothered with minutiae.

    Note the starting numbers for the holy trinity

    Use the IT Operations Center Continual Improvement Tracker:

    • Enter your starting numbers for the holy trinity of metrics.
    • After planning and implementing initiatives, this tracker will be used to update against the holy trinity to assess the success of the project on an ongoing basis and to drive continual improvement.

    PHASE 2

    Define Accountability and Metrics

    Optimize the IT Operations Center

    Step 2.1: Define Accountabilities

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Formalize RACI for key processes.
    • Formalize RACI for key tasks.

    Outcomes of this step

    • Completed RACIs

    List key Operations Center processes

    Compile a list of processes that are key for the Operations Center.

    These processes should include the four foundational processes:

    • Service Desk
    • Incident Management
    • Problem Management
    • Change Management

    You may also want to include processes such as the following:

    • Event Management
    • Configuration Management

    Avoid listing processes you have yet to develop – stick with those already playing a role in your current state.

    Formalize RACI for key processes

    Use the IT Operations Center RACI Charts Template. Complete a RACI for each of the key processes involved in the IT Operations Center.

    RACI:

    • Responsible (does the work on a day-to-day basis)
    • Accountable (reviews, signs off, and is held accountable for outcomes)
    • Consulted (input is sought to feed into decision making)
    • Informed (is given notification of outcomes)

    As a best practice, no more than one person should be responsible or accountable for any given process. The same person can be both responsible and accountable for a given process, or it could be two different people.

    Avoid making someone accountable for a process if they do not have full visibility into the process for appropriate oversight, or do not have time to give the process sufficient attention.

    Formalize RACI for IT tasks

    Now think about the actual tasks or work that goes on in IT. Which roles and individuals are accountable for which tasks or pieces of work?

    In this case, more than one role/person can be listed as responsible or accountable in the RACI because we’re talking about types or categories of work. No conflict will occur because these individuals will be responsible or accountable for different pieces of work or individual tasks of the same type. (e.g. all service desk staff are responsible for answering phones and inputting tickets into the ITSM tool, but no more than one staff member is responsible for the input of any given ticket from a specific phone call).

    Step 2.2: Define Metrics

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Cascade operational metrics from the holy trinity.
    • Evaluate metrics and identify key performance indicators (KPIs).
    • Cascade performance assessment (PA) metrics to support KPIs.
    • Build feedback loop for PA metrics.

    Outcomes of this step

    • KPIs
    • PA metrics

    Metrics must span across silos for shared accountability

    To adequately support the business goals of the organization, IT metrics should span across functional silos.

    Metrics that span across silos foster shared accountability across the IT organization.

    Metrics supported by all groups

    three grain silos are depicted. below, are the words IT Groups, with arrows pointing from the words to each of the three silos.

    Cascade operational metrics from the holy trinity

    Focus on the holy trinity of metrics.

    From these, cascade down to operational metrics that contribute to the holy trinity. It is possible that an operational metric may support more than one trinity metric. For example:

    a flow chart is depicted. two input circles point toward a central circle, and two output circles point away. the input circles include: Cost of Downtime; Cost of Incident Response. The central circle reads: Mean time to restore service. the output circles include the words: Tier 1 Resolution Rate; %% of Known Errors Captured in ITSM Tool.

    Evaluate metrics and identify KPIs

      • Evaluate your operational metrics and determine which ones are likely to have the largest impact on the holy trinity of metrics.
      • Identify the ten metrics likely to have the most impact: these will be your KPIs moving forward.
      • Enter these KPIs into the IT Operations Center Continual Improvement Tracker.
      this image depicts a cycle around the term KPI. The cycle includes: Objective; Measurement; optimization; strategy; performance; evaluation

    Beware how changing variables/context can affect metrics

    • Changes in context can affect metrics drastically. It’s important to keep the overall context in mind to avoid being led astray by certain numbers taken in isolation.
    • For example, a huge hiring spree might exhaust the stock of end-user devices, requiring time to procure hardware before the onboarding tickets can be completely fulfilled. You may have improved your onboarding process through automation, but see a large increase in average time to onboard a new user. Keep an eye out for such anomalies or fluctuations, and avoid putting too much stock in any single operational KPI.
    • Remember, operational KPIs are just a heuristic tool to support the holy trinity of metrics.

    Determine accountability for KPIs

    • For each operational KPI, assign one person to be accountable for that KPI.
    • Be sure the person in charge has the necessary authority and oversight over the processes and personnel that most affect that KPI – otherwise it makes little sense to hold the individual accountable.
    • Consulting your process RACIs is a good place to start.
    • Record the accountable person for each KPI in the IT Operations Center Continual Improvement Tracker.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Match accountability with authority. The person accountable for each KPI should be the one who has the closet and most direct control over the work and processes that most heavily impact that KPI.

    Cascade PA metrics to support KPIs

    KPIs are ultimately driven by how IT does its work, and how individuals work is driven by how their performance is assessed and evaluated.

    For the top KPIs, be sure there are individual PA metrics in place that support the KPI, and if not, develop the appropriate PA metrics.

    For example:

    • KPI: Mean time to resolve incidents
    • PA metric: % of escalations that followed SOP (e.g. not holding onto a ticket longer than supposed to)
    • KPI: Number of knowledge base articles written
    • PA metric: Number of knowledge base articles written/contributed to

    Communicate key changes in PA metrics

    Any changes from the previous step will take time and effort to implement and make stick.

    Changing people’s way of working is extremely difficult.

    Build a communication and implementation plan about rolling out these changes, emphasize the benefits for everyone involved, and get buy-in from the affected staff members.

    Build feedback loops for PA metrics

    Now that PA metrics support your Operations Center’s KPIs, you should create frequent feedback loops to drive and boost those PA metrics.

    Once per year or once per quarter is not frequent enough. Managers should meet with their direct reports at least monthly and review their reports’ performance against PA metrics.

    Use a “set it and forget it” implementation, such as a recurring task or meeting in your calendar.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts

    this is a picture of an Info-Tech Analyst

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.
    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:
    2.2.1 This image contains a screenshot from section 2.2.1 of this blueprint.

    Cascade operational metrics from the holy trinity

    Rank goals based on business impact and stakeholder pecking order.

    2.2.2 this image contains a screenshot from section 2.2.2 of this blueprint.

    Determine accountability for KPIs

    Craft a concise and compelling elevator pitch that will drive the project forward.

    PHASE 3

    Assess Gaps and Prioritize Initiatives

    Optimize the IT Operations Center

    Step 3.1: Assess Gaps

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Assess visibility provided by monitoring.
    • Assess process workflows and identify areas for automation.
    • Assess requests and identify potential for automation.
    • Assess Operations Center staff capabilities.
    • Conduct a root cause analysis on the gaps/pain points.

    Outcomes of this step

    • List of gaps
    • List of root causes

    Measure current state of KPIs and identify lagging ones

    Take a baseline measurement of each operational KPI.

    If historical data is available, compare the present state measurement to data points collected over the last year or so.

    Review the measured KPIs.

    Identify any KPIs that seem lagging or low, or that may be particularly important to influence.

    Record lagging KPIs in the IT Operations Center Gap and Initiative Tracker tool.

    Assess visibility provided by monitoring

    List the top five most critical business services supported by IT.
    Assess the current state of your monitoring tools.

    For each business service, rate the level of visibility your monitoring tools allow from the following options:

    1. We have no visibility into the service, or lack visibility into crucial elements.
    2. We have basic visibility (up/down) into all the IT components that support the service.
    3. We have basic visibility (up/down) into the end service itself, in addition to all the IT components that make it up.
    4. We have some advanced visibility into some aspects of the service and/or its IT components.
    5. We have a full, end-to-end view of performance across all the layers of the stack, as well as the end business service itself.

    Identify where more visibility may be necessary

    For most organizations it isn’t practical to have complete visibility into everything. For the areas in which visibility is lacking into key services, think about whether more visibility is actually required or not. Consider some of the following questions:

    • How great is the impact of this service being unavailable?
    • Would greater visibility into the service significantly reduce the mean time to restore the service in the event of incidents?

    Record any deficiencies in the IT Operations CenterGap and Initiative Tracker tool.

    Assess alerting

    Assess alerting for your most critical services.

    Consider whether any of the following problems occur:

    • Often receive no alert(s) in the event of critical outages of key services (we find out about critical outages from the service desk).
    • We are regularly overwhelmed with too many alerts to investigate properly.
    • Our alerts are rarely actionable.
    • We often receive many false alerts.

    Identify areas for potential improvement in the managing of alerts. Record any deficiencies in the IT Operations Center Gap and Initiative Tracker tool.

    Assess process workflows and identify areas for automation

    Review your process flows for base processes such as Service Desk, Incident Management, Problem Management, and Change Management.

    Identify areas in the workflows where there may be defects, inefficiencies, or potential for improvement or automation.

    Record any deficiencies in the IT Operations Center Gap and Initiative Tracker tool.

    See the blueprint Prepare for Cognitive Service Management for process workflows and areas to look for automation possibilities.

    Prepare for Cognitive Service Management

    Make ready for AI-assisted IT operations.

    Assess requests and identify potential for automation

    • Assess the most common work orders or requests handled by the Operations Center group (i.e. this does not include requests fulfilled by the help desk).
    • Which work orders are the most painful? That is, what common work orders involve the greatest effort or the most manual work to fulfill?
    • Fulfillment of common, recurring work orders is MRW, and should be reduced or removed if possible.
    • Consider automation of certain work orders, or self-service delivery.
    • Record any deficiencies in the IT Operations Center Gap and Initiative Tracker tool.

    Assess Operations Center staff capabilities

    • Assess the skills and expertise of your team members.
    • Consider some of the following:
      • Are there team members who could perform their job more effectively by picking up certain skills or proficiencies?
      • Are there team members who have the potential to shift into more valuable or useful roles, given the appropriate training?
      • Are there individual team members whose knowledge is crucial for operations, and whose function cannot be taken up by others?

    Record any deficiencies in the IT Operations Center Gap and Initiative Tracker tool.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Train to avoid pain. All too often organizations expose themselves to significant key person risk by relying on the specialized skills and knowledge of one team member. Use cross training to remedy such single points of failure before the risk materializes.

    Brainstorm pain points

    Brainstorm any pain points not discussed in the previous areas.

    Pain points can be specific operational issues that have not yet been considered. For example:

    • Tom is overwhelmed with tickets.
    • Our MSP often breaches SLA.
    • We don’t have a training budget.

    Record any deficiencies in the IT Operations CenterGap and Initiative Tracker tool.

    Conduct a root cause analysis on the gaps/pain points

    • Pain points can often be symptoms of other deficiencies, or somewhat removed from the actual problem.
    • Using the 5 Whys, conduct a root cause analysis on the pain points for which the causes are not obvious.
    • For each pain point, ask “why” for a sequence of five times, attempting to proceed to the root cause of the issue. This root cause is the true gap that needs to be remedied to resolve the pain point.
    • For example:
      • The Wi-Fi network often goes down in the afternoon.
        • Why?: Its bandwidth gets overloaded.
        • Why?: Many people are streaming video.
        • Why?: There’s a live broadcast of a football game at that time.
      • Possible solutions:
        • Block access to the streaming services.
        • Project the game on a screen in a large conference room and encourage everyone to watch it there.

    Step 3.2: Plan Initiatives

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Brainstorm initiatives to boost KPIs and address gaps.
    • Prioritize potential initiatives.
    • Decide which initiatives to include on the roadmap.

    Outcomes of this step

    • Targeted improvement roadmap

    Brainstorm initiatives to boost KPIs and address gaps

    Prioritize potential initiatives

    3.2.1 IT Operations Center Initiative Prioritization Tool

    • Use the IT Operations Center Initiative Prioritization Tool.
    • Enter the initiatives into the tool.
    • For each initiative, input the following ranking criteria:
      • The metric/KPI’s estimated degree of impact on the holy trinity.
      • The gap or pain point’s estimated degree of impact on the metric/KPI.
      • The initiative’s estimated degree of positive impact on the gap or pain point
      • The initiative’s attainability.
    • Estimate the resourcing capacity required for each initiative.
    • For accurate capacity assessment, input as “force include” all current in-flight projects handled by the Operations Center group (including those unrelated to the Operations Center project).

    Decide which initiatives to include on the roadmap

    • Not all initiatives will be worth pursuing – and especially not all at once.
    • Consider the results displayed on the final tab of the IT Operations CenterInitiative Prioritization Tool.
    • Based on the prioritization and taking capacity into account, decide which initiatives to include on your roadmap.
    • Sometimes, for operational or logistical reasons, it may make sense to schedule an initiative at a time other than its priority might dictate. Make such exceptions on a case-by-case basis.

    Assign an owner to each initiative, and provide resourcing

    • For each initiative, assign one person to be the owner of that initiative.
    • Be sure that person has the authority and the bandwidth necessary to drive the initiative forward.
    • Secure additional resourcing for any initiatives you want to include on your roadmap that are lacking capacity.

    Info-Tech Insight

    You must invest resources in order to reduce the time spent on non-value-adding work.

    "The SRE model of working – and all of the benefits that come with it – depends on teams having ample capacity for engineering work. If toil eats up that capacity, the SRE model can’t be launched or sustained. An SRE perpetually buried under toil isn’t an SRE, they are just a traditional long-suffering SysAdmin with a new title."– David N. Blank-Edelman

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts

    this is a picture of an Info-Tech Analyst

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.
    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:
    3.1.1 This image contains a screenshot from section 3.1.1 of this blueprint.

    Conduct a root cause analysis on the gaps/pain points

    Find out the cause, so you can come up with solutions.

    3.2.1 this image contains a screenshot from section 3.2.1 of this blueprint.

    Prioritize potential initiatives

    Don’t try to boil the ocean. Target what’s manageable and what will have the most impact.

    PHASE 4

    Launch Initiatives and Track Metrics

    Optimize the IT Operations Center

    Step 4.1: Lay Foundation

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Build initiative communication plan.
    • Develop a testing plan for each technical initiative.

    Outcomes of this step

    • Communication plan
    • Testing plan(s)

    Expect resistance to change

    • It’s not as simple as rolling out what you’ve designed.
    • Anything that affects people’s way of working will inevitably be met with suspicion and pushback.
    • Be prepared to fight the battle.
    • "The hardest part is culture. You must get people to see the value of automation. Their first response is ‘We've been doing it this way for 10 years, why do we need to do it another way?’ It's hard to get someone out of their comfort zone to learn something new, especially when they've been at an organization for 20 years. You need to give them incentives."– Cyrus Kalatbari, Senior IT Architect, Infrastructure/Cloud

    Communicate changes in advance, along with their benefits!

    • Communicate changes well in advance of the date(s) of implementation.
    • Emphasize the benefits of the changes – not just for the organization, but for employees and staff members.
    • Advance communication of changes helps make them more palatable, and builds trust in employees by making them feel informed of what’s going on.

    Involve IT staff in design and implementation of changes

    • As you communicate the coming changes, take the opportunity to involve any affected staff members who have not yet participated in the project.
    • Solicit their feedback and get them to help design and implement the initiatives that involve significant changes to their roles.

    Develop a testing plan for each technical initiative

    • Some initiatives, such as appointing a new change manager or hiring a new staff member, do not make sense to test.
    • On the other hand, technical initiatives such as automation scripts, new monitoring tools or dashboards, and changed alert thresholds should be tested thoroughly before implementation.
    • For each technical initiative, think about the expected results and performance if it were to run in production, and build a test plan to ensure it behaves as expected and there are no corner cases.

    Test technology initiatives and iterate if necessary

    • Test each technical initiative under a variety of circumstances, with as close an environment to production as possible.
    • Try to develop corner cases or unusual or unexpected situations, and see if any of these will break the functionality or produce unintended or unexpected results.
    • Document the results of the testing, and iterate on the initiative and test again if necessary.

    "The most important things – and the things that people miss – are prerequisites and expected results. People jump out and build scripts, then the scripts go into the ditch, and they end up debugging in production." – Darin Stahl, Research Director, Infrastructure & Operations

    Step 4.2: Launch and Measure

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Launch initiatives and track adoption and effectiveness.
    • Investigate initiatives that appear ineffective.
    • Measure success with the holy trinity.

    Outcomes of this step

    • Continual improvement roadmap

    Establish a review cycle for each metric

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Don’t measure what doesn’t matter. If a metric is not going to be reviewed or reported on for informational or decision-making purposes, it should not be tracked.

    Launch initiatives and track adoption and effectiveness

    • Launch the initiatives.
    • Some initiatives will need to proceed through your change management process in order to roll out, but others will not.
    • Track the adoption of initiatives that require it.
      • Some initiatives will require tracking of adoption, whereas others will not.
      • For example, hiring a new service desk staff member does not require tracking of adoption, but implementing a new process for ticket handling does.
      • The implementation plan should include a way to measure the adoption of such initiatives, and regularly review the numbers to see if the implementation has been successful.
    • For all initiatives, measure their effectiveness by continuing to track the KPI/metric that the initiative is intended to influence.

    Assess metrics according to review cycle for continual improvement

    • Assess metrics according to the review cycle.
    • Note whether metrics are improving in the right direction or not.
    • Correlate changes in the metrics with measures of the adoption of the initiatives – see whether initiatives that have been adopted are moving the needle on the KPIs they are intended to.

    Investigate initiatives that appear ineffective

    • If the adoption of an initiative has succeeded, but the expected impact of that initiative on the KPI has not taken place, investigate further and conduct a root causes analysis to determine why this is the case.
    • Sometimes, anomalies or fluctuations will occur that cause the KPI not to move in accordance with the success of the initiative. In this case, it’s just a fluke and the initiative can still be successful in influencing the KPI over the long term.
    • Other times, the initiative may prove mostly or entirely ineffective, either due to misdesign of the initiative itself, a change of circumstances, or other compounding factors or complexities. If the initiative proves ineffective, consider iterating modifications of the initiative and continuing to measure the effect on KPIs – or perhaps killing the initiative altogether.
    • Remember that experimentation is not a bad thing – it’s okay that not every initiative will always prove worthwhile.

    Measure success with the holy trinity

    • Report to business stakeholders on the effect on the holy trinity of metrics at least annually.
    • Calculate the ROI of the project after two years and compare the results to the targeted ROI you initially presented in the IT Operations Center Stakeholder Buy-In Presentation.
    This image contains a Funnel Chart showing the inputs: Downtime; Cost of Incident Response; MRW; and the output: Reduce for continual improvement

    Iterate on the Operations Center process for continual improvement

    This image depicts a cycle, which includes: Data analysis; Executive Sponsorship; Success Criteria; Gap Assessment; Initiatives; Tracking & Measurement

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts

    this is a picture of an Info-Tech Analyst

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.
    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:
    4.1.1This image contains a screenshot from section 3.1.1 of this blueprint.

    Communicate changes in advance, along with their benefits!

    Rank goals based on business impact and stakeholder pecking order.

    4.1.2 this image contains a screenshot from section 3.2.1 of this blueprint.

    Develop a testing plan for each technical initiative

    Craft a concise and compelling elevator pitch that will drive the project forward.

    Research contributors and experts
    This is a picture of Cyrus Kalatbari, IT infrastructure/cloud architect

    Cyrus Kalatbari, IT Infrastructure/Cloud Architect

    Cyrus’ in-depth knowledge cutting across I&O and service delivery has enhanced the IT operations of multiple enterprise-class clients.

    This is a picture of Derek Cullen, Chief Technology Officer

    Derek Cullen, Chief Technology Officer

    Derek is a proven leader in managing enterprise-scale development, deployment, and integration of applications, platforms, and systems, with a sharp focus on organizational transformation and corporate change.

    This is a picture of Phil Webb, Senior Manager

    Phil Webb, Senior Manager – Unified Messaging and Mobility

    Phil specializes in service delivery for cloud-based and hybrid technology solutions, spanning requirements gathering, solution design, new technology introduction, development, integration, deployment, production support, change/release delivery, maintenance, and continuous improvement.

    This is a picture of Richie Mendoza, IT Services Delivery Consultant

    Richie Mendoza, IT Services Delivery Consultant

    Ritchie’s accomplishments include pioneering a cloud capacity management process and presenting to the Operations team and to higher management, while providing a high level of technical leadership in all phases of capacity management activities.

    This is a picture of Rob Thompson, Solutions Architect

    Rob Thomson, Solutions Architect

    Rob is an IT leader with a track record of creating and executing digital transformation initiatives to achieve the desired outcomes by integrating people, process, and technology into an efficient and effective operating model.

    Related Info-Tech research

    Create a Configuration Management Roadmap

    Right-size your CMDB to improve IT operations.

    Harness Configuration Management Superpowers

    Build a CMDB around the IT services that are most important to the organization.

    Develop an IT Infrastructure Services Playbook

    Automation, SDI, and DevOps – build a cheat sheet to manage a changing Infrastructure & Operations environment.

    Develop an Availability and Capacity Management Plan

    Manage capacity to increase uptime and reduce costs.

    Establish a Program to Enable Effective Performance Monitoring

    Maximize the benefits of infrastructure monitoring investments by diagnosing and assessing transaction performance, from network to server to end-user interface.

    Bibliography

    Baker, Dan, and Hal Baylor. “How Benchmarking & Streamlining NOC Operations Can Lower Costs & Boost Effectiveness.” Top Operator, Mar. 2017. Web.

    Blank-Edelman, David. Seeking SRE: Conversations About Running Production Systems at Scale. O'Reilly, 2018. Web.

    CA Technologies. “IT Transformation to Next-Generation Operations Centers: Assure Business Service Reliability by Optimizing IT Operations.” CA Technologies, 2014. Web.

    Ditmore, Jim. “Improving Availability: Where to Start.” Recipes for IT, n.d. Web.

    Ennis, Shawn. “A Phased Approach for Building a Next-Generation Network Operations Center.” Monolith Software, 2009. Web.

    Faraclas, Matt. “Why Does Infrastructure Operations Still Suck?” Ideni, 25 Feb. 2016. Web.

    InterOp ITX. “2018 State of the Cloud.” InterOp ITX, Feb. 2018. Web.

    ITIC. “Cost of Hourly Downtime Soars: 81% of Enterprises Say it Exceeds $300K On Average.” ITIC, 2 Aug. 2016. Web.

    Joe the IT Guy. “Availability Management Is Harder Than it Looks.” Joe the IT Guy, 10 Feb. 2016. Web.

    ---. “Do Quick Wins Exist for Availability Management?” Joe the IT Guy, 15 May 2014. Web.

    Lawless, Steve. “11 Top Tips for Availability Management.” Purple Griffon, 4 Jan. 2019. Web.

    Metzler, Jim. “The Next Generation Network Operations Center: How the Focus on Application Delivery is Redefining the NOC.” Ashton, Metzler & Associates, n.d. Web.

    Nilekar, Shirish. “Beyond Redundancy: Improving IT Availability.” Network Computing, 28 Aug. 2015. Web.

    Slocum, Mac. “Site Reliability Engineering (SRE): A Simple Overview.” O’Reilly, 16 Aug. 2018. Web.

    Spiceworks. “The 2019 State of IT.” Spiceworks, 2019. Web

    Take Control of Cloud Costs on AWS

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}425|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.3/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $62,500 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 26 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Cloud Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /cloud-strategy
    • Traditional IT budgeting and procurement processes don't work for public cloud services.
    • The self-service nature of the cloud means that often the people provisioning cloud resources aren't accountable for the cost of those resources.
    • Without centralized control or oversight, organizations can quickly end up with massive AWS bills that exceed their IT salary cost.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Most engineers care more about speed of feature delivery and reliability of the system than they do about cost.
    • Often there are no consequences for over architecting or overspending on AWS.
    • Many organizations lack sufficient visibility into their AWS spend, making it impossible to establish accountability and controls.

    Impact and Result

    • Define roles and responsibilities.
    • Establish visibility.
    • Develop processes, procedures, and policies.

    Take Control of Cloud Costs on AWS Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should take control of cloud costs, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Build cost accountability framework

    Assess your current state, define your cost allocation model, and define roles and responsibilities.

    • Cloud Cost Management Worksheet
    • Cloud Cost Management Capability Assessment
    • Cloud Cost Management Policy
    • Cloud Cost Glossary of Terms

    2. Establish visibility

    Define dashboards and reports, and document account structure and tagging requirements.

    • Service Cost Cheat Sheet

    3. Define processes and procedures

    Establish governance for tagging and cost control, define processes for right-sizing, and define processes for purchasing commitment discounts.

    • Right-Sizing Workflow (Visio)
    • Right-Sizing Workflow (PDF)
    • Commitment Purchasing Workflow (Visio)
    • Commitment Purchasing Workflow (PDF)

    4. Build implementation plan

    Document process interactions, establish program KPIs, and build implementation roadmap and communication plan.

    • Cloud Cost Management Task List

    Infographic

    Workshop: Take Control of Cloud Costs on AWS

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Build Cost Accountability Framework

    The Purpose

    Establish clear lines of accountability and document roles and responsibilities to effectively manage cloud costs.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Chargeback/showback model to provide clear accountability for costs.

    Understanding of key areas to focus on to improve cloud cost management capabilities.

    Activities

    1.1 Assess current state

    1.2 Determine cloud cost model

    1.3 Define roles and responsibilities

    Outputs

    Cloud cost management capability assessment

    Cloud cost model

    Roles and responsibilities

    2 Establish Visibility

    The Purpose

    Establish visibility into cloud costs and drivers of those costs.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Better understanding of what is driving costs and how to keep them in check.

    Activities

    2.1 Develop architectural patterns

    2.2 Define dashboards and reports

    2.3 Define account structure

    2.4 Document tagging requirements

    Outputs

    Architectural patterns; service cost cheat sheet

    Dashboards and reports

    Account structure

    Tagging scheme

    3 Define Processes and Procedures

    The Purpose

    Develop processes, procedures, and policies to control cloud costs.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Improved capability of reducing costs.

    Documented processes and procedures for continuous improvement.

    Activities

    3.1 Establish governance for tagging

    3.2 Establish governance for costs

    3.3 Define right-sizing process

    3.4 Define purchasing process

    3.5 Define notification and alerts

    Outputs

    Tagging policy

    Cost control policy

    Right-sizing process

    Commitment purchasing process

    Notifications and Alerts

    4 Build Implementation Plan

    The Purpose

    Document next steps to implement and improve cloud cost management program.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Concrete roadmap to stand up and/or improve the cloud cost management program.

    Activities

    4.1 Document process interaction changes

    4.2 Define cloud cost program KPIs

    4.3 Build implementation roadmap

    4.4 Build communication plan

    Outputs

    Changes to process interactions

    Cloud cost program KPIs

    Implementation roadmap

    Communication plan

    It wasn't me

    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Security and Risk
    • Parent Category Link: /security-and-risk

    You heard the message before, and yet....  and yet it does not sink in.

    In july 2019 already, according to retruster:

    • The average financial cost of a data breach is $3.86m (IBM)
    • Phishing accounts for 90% of data breaches
    • 15% of people successfully phished will be targeted at least one more time within the year
    • BEC scams accounted for over $12 billion in losses (FBI)
    • Phishing attempts have grown 65% in the last year
    • Around 1.5m new phishing sites are created each month (Webroot)
    • 76% of businesses reported being a victim of a phishing attack in the last year
    • 30% of phishing messages get opened by targeted users (Verizon)

    This is ... this means we, as risk professionals may be delivering our messsage the wrong way. So, I really enjoyed my colleague Nick Felix (who got it from Alison Francis) sending me the URL of this video: Enjoy, but mostly: learn, because we want our children to enjoy the fruits of our work.

    Register to read more …

    Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}410|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.6/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $83,037 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 32 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: DR and Business Continuity
    • Parent Category Link: /business-continuity
    • Any time a natural disaster or major IT outage occurs, it increases executive awareness and internal pressure to create a disaster recovery plan (DRP).
    • Traditional DRP templates are onerous and result in a lengthy, dense plan that might satisfy auditors but will not be effective in a crisis.
    • The myth that a DRP is only for major disasters leaves organizations vulnerable to more common incidents.
    • The growing use of outsourced infrastructure services has increased reliance on vendors to meet recovery timeline objectives.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • At its core, disaster recovery (DR) is about ensuring service continuity. Create a plan that can be leveraged for both isolated and catastrophic events.
    • Remember Murphy’s Law. Failure happens. Focus on improving overall resiliency and recovery, rather than basing DR on risk probability analysis.
    • Cost-effective DR and service continuity starts with identifying what is truly mission critical so you can focus resources accordingly. Not all services require fast failover.

    Impact and Result

    • Define appropriate objectives for service downtime and data loss based on business impact.
    • Document an incident response plan that captures all of the steps from event detection to data center recovery.
    • Create a DR roadmap to close gaps between current DR capabilities and recovery objectives.

    Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Disaster Recovery Plan (DRP) Research – A step-by-step document that helps streamline your DR planning process and build a plan that's concise, usable, and maintainable.

    Any time a major IT outage occurs, it increases executive awareness and internal pressure to create an IT DRP. This blueprint will help you develop an actionable DRP by following our four-phase methodology to define scope, current status, and dependencies; conduct a business impact analysis; identify and address gaps in the recovery workflow; and complete, extend, and maintain your DRP.

    • Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan – Phases 1-4

    2. DRP Case Studies – Examples to help you understand the governance and incident response components of a DRP and to show that your DRP project does not need to be as onerous as imagined.

    These examples include a client who leveraged the DRP blueprint to create practical, concise, and easy-to-maintain DRP governance and incident response plans and a case study based on a hospital providing a wide range of healthcare services.

    • Case Study: Practical, Right-Sized DRP
    • Case Study: Practical, Right-Sized DRP – Healthcare Example

    3. DRP Maturity Scorecard – An assessment tool to evaluate the current state of your DRP.

    Use this tool to measure your current DRP maturity and identify gaps to address. It includes a comprehensive list of requirements for your DRP program, including core and industry requirements.

    • DRP Maturity Scorecard

    4. DRP Project Charter Template – A template to communicate important details on the project purpose, scope, and parameters.

    The project charter template includes details on the project overview (description, background, drivers, and objectives); governance and management (project stakeholders/roles, budget, and dependencies); and risks, assumptions, and constraints (known and potential risks and mitigation strategy).

    • DRP Project Charter Template

    5. DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool – An evaluation tool to estimate the impact of downtime to determine appropriate, acceptable recovery time objectives (RTOs) and recovery point objectives (RPOs) and to review gaps between objectives and actuals.

    This tool enables you to identify critical applications/systems; identify dependencies; define objective scoring criteria to evaluate the impact of application/system downtime; determine the impact of downtime and establish criticality tiers; set recovery objectives (RTO/RPO) based on the impact of downtime; record recovery actuals (RTA/RPA) and identify any gaps between objectives and actuals; and identify dependencies that regularly fail (and have a significant impact when they fail) to prioritize efforts to improve resiliency.

    • DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool
    • Legacy DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool

    6. DRP BIA Scoring Context Example – A tool to record assumptions you made in the DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool to explain the results and drive business engagement and feedback.

    Use this tool to specifically record assumptions made about who and what are impacted by system downtime and record assumptions made about impact severity.

    • DRP BIA Scoring Context Example

    7. DRP Recovery Workflow Template – A flowchart template to provide an at-a-glance view of the recovery workflow.

    This simple format is ideal during crisis situations, easier to maintain, and often quicker to create. Use this template to document the Notify - Assess - Declare disaster workflow, document current and planned future state recovery workflows, including gaps and risks, and review an example recovery workflow.

    • DRP Recovery Workflow Template (PDF)
    • DRP Recovery Workflow Template (Visio)

    8. DRP Roadmap Tool – A visual roadmapping tool that will help you plan, communicate, and track progress for your DRP initiatives.

    Improving DR capabilities is a marathon, not a sprint. You likely can't fund and resource all the measures for risk mitigation at once. Instead, use this tool to create a roadmap for actions, tasks, projects, and initiatives to complete in the short, medium, and long term. Prioritize high-benefit, low-cost mitigations.

    • DRP Roadmap Tool

    9. DRP Recap and Results Template – A template to summarize and present key findings from your DR planning exercises and documents.

    Use this template to present your results from the DRP Maturity Scorecard, BCP-DRP Fitness Assessment, DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool, tabletop planning exercises, DRP Recovery Workflow Template, and DRP Roadmap Tool.

    • DRP Recap and Results Template

    10. DRP Workbook – A comprehensive tool that enables you to organize information to support DR planning.

    Leverage this tool to document information regarding DRP resources (list the documents/information sources that support DR planning and where they are located) and DR teams and contacts (list the DR teams, SMEs critical to DR, and key contacts, including business continuity management team leads that would be involved in declaring a disaster and coordinating response at an organizational level).

    • DRP Workbook

    11. Appendix

    The following tools and templates are also included as part of this blueprint to use as needed to supplement the core steps above:

    • DRP Incident Response Management Tool
    • DRP Vendor Evaluation Questionnaire
    • DRP Vendor Evaluation Tool
    • Severity Definitions and Escalation Rules Template
    • BCP-DRP Fitness Assessment
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Define Parameters for Your DRP

    The Purpose

    Identify key applications and dependencies based on business needs.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understand the entire IT “footprint” that needs to be recovered for key applications. 

    Activities

    1.1 Assess current DR maturity.

    1.2 Determine critical business operations.

    1.3 Identify key applications and dependencies.

    Outputs

    Current challenges identified through a DRP Maturity Scorecard.

    Key applications and dependencies documented in the Business Impact Analysis (BIA) Tool.

    2 Determine the Desired Recovery Timeline

    The Purpose

    Quantify application criticality based on business impact.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Appropriate recovery time and recovery point objectives defined (RTOs/RPOs).

    Activities

    2.1 Define an objective scoring scale to indicate different levels of impact.

    2.2 Estimate the impact of downtime.

    2.3 Determine desired RTO/RPO targets for applications based on business impact.

    Outputs

    Business impact analysis scoring criteria defined.

    Application criticality validated.

    RTOs/RPOs defined for applications and dependencies.

    3 Determine the Current Recovery Timeline and DR Gaps

    The Purpose

    Determine your baseline DR capabilities (your current state).

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Gaps between current and desired DR capability are quantified.

    Activities

    3.1 Conduct a tabletop exercise to determine current recovery procedures.

    3.2 Identify gaps between current and desired capabilities.

    3.3 Estimate likelihood and impact of failure of individual dependencies.

    Outputs

    Current achievable recovery timeline defined (i.e. the current state).

    RTO/RPO gaps identified.

    Critical single points of failure identified.

    4 Create a Project Roadmap to Close DR Gaps

    The Purpose

    Identify and prioritize projects to close DR gaps.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    DRP project roadmap defined that will reduce downtime and data loss to acceptable levels.

    Activities

    4.1 Determine what projects are required to close the gap between current and desired DR capability.

    4.2 Prioritize projects based on cost, effort, and impact on RTO/RPO reduction.

    4.3 Validate that the suggested projects will achieve the desired DR capability.

    Outputs

    Potential DR projects identified.

    DRP project roadmap defined.

    Desired-state incident response plan defined, and project roadmap validated.

    5 Establish a Framework for Documenting Your DRP, and Summarize Next Steps

    The Purpose

    Outline how to create concise, usable DRP documentation.

    Summarize workshop results. 

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A realistic and practical approach to documenting your DRP.

    Next steps documented. 

    Activities

    5.1 Outline a strategy for using flowcharts and checklists to create concise, usable documentation.

    5.2 Review Info-Tech’s DRP templates for creating system recovery procedures and a DRP summary document.

    5.3 Summarize the workshop results, including current potential downtime and action items to close gaps.

    Outputs

    Current-state and desired-state incident response plan flowcharts.

    Templates to create more detailed documentation where necessary.

    Executive communication deck that outlines current DR gaps, how to close those gaps, and recommended next steps.

    Further reading

    Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan

    Close the gap between your DR capabilities and service continuity requirements.

    ANALYST PERSPECTIVE

    An effective disaster recovery plan (DRP) is not just an insurance policy.

    "An effective DRP addresses common outages such as hardware and software failures, as well as regional events, to provide day-to-day service continuity. It’s not just insurance you might never cash in. Customers are also demanding evidence of an effective DRP, so organizations without a DRP risk business impact not only from extended outages but also from lost sales. If you are fortunate enough to have executive buy-in, whether it’s due to customer pressure or concern over potential downtime, you still have the challenge of limited time to dedicate to disaster recovery (DR) planning. Organizations need a practical but structured approach that enables IT leaders to create a DRP without it becoming their full-time job."

    Frank Trovato,

    Research Director, Infrastructure

    Info-Tech Research Group

    Is this research for you?

    This Research Is Designed For:

    • Senior IT management responsible for executing DR.
    • Organizations seeking to formalize, optimize, or validate an existing DRP.
    • Business continuity management (BCM) professionals leading DRP development.

    This Research Will Help You:

    • Create a DRP that is aligned with business requirements.
    • Prioritize technology enhancements based on DR requirements and risk-impact analysis.
    • Identify and address process and technology gaps that impact DR capabilities and day-to-day service continuity.

    This Research Will Also Assist:

    • Executives who want to understand the time and resource commitment required for DRP.
    • Members of BCM and crisis management teams who need to understand the key elements of an IT DRP.

    This Research Will Help Them:

    • Scope the time and effort required to develop a DRP.
    • Align business continuity, DR, and crisis management plans.

    Executive summary

    Situation

    • Any time a natural disaster or major IT outage occurs, it increases executive awareness and internal pressure to create a DRP.
    • Industry standards and government regulations are driving external pressure to develop business continuity and IT DR plans.
    • Customers are asking suppliers and partners to provide evidence that they have a workable DRP before agreeing to do business.

    Complication

    • Traditional DRP templates are onerous and result in a lengthy, dense plan that might satisfy auditors, but will not be effective in a crisis.
    • The myth that a DRP is only for major disasters leaves organizations vulnerable to more common incidents.
    • The growing use of outsourced infrastructure services has increased reliance on vendors to meet recovery timeline objectives.

    Resolution

    • Create an effective DRP by following a structured process to discover current capabilities and define business requirements for continuity:
      • Define appropriate objectives for service downtime and data loss based on business impact.
      • Document an incident response plan that captures all of the steps from event detection to data center recovery.
      • Create a DR roadmap to close gaps between current DR capabilities and recovery objectives.

    Info-Tech Insight

    1. At its core, DR is about ensuring service continuity. Create a plan that can be leveraged for both isolated and catastrophic events.
    2. Remember Murphy’s Law. Failure happens. Focus on improving overall resiliency and recovery, rather than basing DR on risk probability analysis.
    3. Cost-effective DR and service continuity starts with identifying what is truly mission critical so you can focus resources accordingly. Not all services require fast failover.

    An effective DRP is critical to reducing the cost of downtime

    If you don’t have an effective DRP when failure occurs, expect to face extended downtime and exponentially rising costs due to confusion and lack of documented processes.

    Image displayed is a graph that shows that delay in recovery causes exponential revenue loss.

    Potential Lost Revenue

    The impact of downtime tends to increase exponentially as systems remain unavailable (graph at left). A current, tested DRP will significantly improve your ability to execute systems recovery, minimizing downtime and business impact. Without a DRP, IT is gambling on its ability to define and implement a recovery strategy during a time of crisis. At the very least, this means extended downtime – potentially weeks or months – and substantial business impact.

    Adapted from: Philip Jan Rothstein, 2007

    Cost of Downtime for the Fortune 1000

    Cost of unplanned apps downtime per year: $1.25B to $2.5B.

    Cost of critical apps failure per hour: $500,000 to $1M.

    Cost of infrastructure failure per hour: $100,000.

    35% reported to have recovered within 12 hours.

    17% of infrastructure failures took more than 24 hours to recover.

    13% of application failures took more than 24 hours to recover.

    Source: Stephen Elliot, 2015

    Info-Tech Insight

    The cost of downtime is rising across the board, and not just for organizations that traditionally depend on IT (e.g. e-commerce). Downtime cost increase since 2010:

    Hospitality: 129% increase

    Transportation: 108% increase

    Media organizations: 104% increase

    An effective DRP also sets clear recovery objectives that align with system criticality to optimize spend

    The image displays a disaster recovery plan example, where different tiers are in place to support recovery in relation to time.

    Take a practical approach that creates a more concise and actionable DRP

    DR planning is not your full-time job, so it can’t be a resource- and time-intensive process.

    The Traditional Approach Info-Tech’s Approach

    Start with extensive risk and probability analysis.

    Challenge: You can’t predict every event that can occur, and this delays work on your actual recovery procedures.

    Focus on how to recover regardless of the incident.

    We know failure will happen. Focus on improving your ability to failover to a DR environment so you are protected regardless of what causes primary site failure.

    Build a plan for major events such as natural disasters.

    Challenge: Major destructive events only account for 12% of incidents while software/hardware issues account for 45%. The vast majority of incidents are isolated local events.

    An effective DRP improves day-to-day service continuity, and is not just for major events.

    Leverage DR planning to address both common (e.g. power/network outage or hardware failure) as well as major events. It must be documentation you can use, not shelfware.

    Create a DRP manual that provides step-by-step instructions that anyone could follow.

    Challenge: The result is lengthy, dense manuals that are difficult to maintain and hard to use in a crisis. The usability of DR documents has a direct impact on DR success.

    Create concise documentation written for technical experts.

    Use flowcharts, checklists, and diagrams. They are more usable in a crisis and easier to maintain. You aren’t going to ask a business user to recover your SQL Server databases, so you can afford to be concise.

    DR must be integrated with day-to-day incident management to ensure service continuity

    When a tornado takes out your data center, it’s an obvious DR scenario and the escalation towards declaring a disaster is straightforward.

    The challenge is to be just as decisive in less-obvious (and more common) DR scenarios such as a critical system hardware/software failure, and knowing when to move from incident management to DR. Don’t get stuck troubleshooting for days when you could have failed over in hours.

    Bridge the gap with clearly-defined escalation rules and criteria for when to treat an incident as a disaster.

    Image displays two graphs. The graph on the left measures the extent that service management processes account for disasters by the success meeting RTO and RPO. The graph on the right is a double bar graph that shows DRP being integrated and not integrated in the following categories: Incident Classifications, Severity Definitions, Incident Models, Escalation Procedures. These are measured based on the success meeting RTO and RPO.

    Source: Info-Tech Research Group; N=92

    Myth busted: The DRP is separate from day-to-day ops and incident management.

    The most common threats to service continuity are hardware and software failures, network outages, and power outages

    The image displayed is a bar graph that shows the common threats to service continuity. There are two areas of interest that have labels. The first is: 45% of service interruptions that went beyond maximum downtime guidelines set by the business were caused by software and hardware issues. The second label is: Only 12% of incidents were caused by major destructive events.

    Source: Info-Tech Research Group; N=87

    Info-Tech Insight

    Does this mean I don’t need to worry about natural disasters? No. It means DR planning needs to focus on overall service continuity, not just major disasters. If you ignore the more common but less dramatic causes of service interruptions, you are diminishing the business value of a DRP.

    Myth busted: DRPs are just for destructive events – fires, floods, and natural disasters.

    DR isn’t about identifying risks; it’s about ensuring service continuity

    The traditional approach to DR starts with an in-depth exercise to identify risks to IT service continuity and the probability that those risks will occur.

    Here’s why starting with a risk register is ineffective:

    • Odds are, you won’t think of every incident that might occur. If you think of twenty risks, it’ll be the twenty-first that gets you. If you try to guard against that twenty-first risk, you can quickly get into cartoonish scenarios and much more costly solutions.
    • The ability to failover to another site mitigates the risk of most (if not all) incidents (fire, flood, hardware failure, tornado, etc.). A risk and probability analysis doesn’t change the need for a plan that includes a failover procedure.

    Where risk is incorporated in this methodology:

    • Use known risks to further refine your strategy (e.g. if you are prone to hurricanes, plan for greater geographic separation between sites; ensure you have backups, in addition to replication, to mitigate the risk of ransomware).
    • Identify risks to your ability to execute DR (e.g. lack of cross-training, backups that are not tested) and take steps to mitigate those risks.

    Myth busted: A risk register is the critical first step to creating an effective DR plan.

    You can’t outsource accountability and you can’t assume your vendor’s DR capabilities meet your needs

    Outsourcing infrastructure services – to a cloud provider, co-location provider, or managed service provider (MSP) – can improve your DR and service continuity capabilities. For example, a large public cloud provider will generally have:

    • Redundant telecoms service providers, network infrastructure, power feeds, and standby power.
    • Round-the-clock infrastructure and security monitoring.
    • Multiple data centers in a given region, and options to replicate data and services across regions.

    Still, failure is inevitable – it’s been demonstrated multiple times1 through high-profile outages. When you surrender direct control of the systems themselves, it’s your responsibility to ensure the vendor can meet your DR requirements, including:

    • A DR site and acceptable recovery times for systems at that site.
    • An acceptable replication/backup schedule.

    Sources: Kyle York, 2016; Shaun Nichols, 2017; Stephen Burke, 2017

    Myth busted: I outsource infrastructure services so I don’t have to worry about DR. That’s my vendor’s responsibility.

    Choose flowcharts over process guides, checklists over procedures, and diagrams over descriptions

    IT DR is not an airplane disaster movie. You aren’t going to ask a business user to execute a system recovery, just like you wouldn’t really want a passenger with no flying experience to land a plane.

    In reality, you write a DR plan for knowledgeable technical staff, which allows you to summarize key details your staff already know. Concise, visual documentation is:

    • Quicker to create.
    • Easier to use.
    • Simpler to maintain.

    "Without question, 300-page DRPs are not effective. I mean, auditors love them because of the detail, but give me a 10-page DRP with contact lists, process flows, diagrams, and recovery checklists that are easy to follow."

    – Bernard Jones, MBCI, CBCP, CORP, Manager Disaster Recovery/BCP, ActiveHealth Management

    A graph is displayed. It shows a line graph where the DR success is higher by using flowcharts, checklists, and diagrams.

    Source: Info-Tech Research Group; N=95

    *DR Success is based on stated ability to meet recovery time objectives (RTOs) and recovery point objectives (RPOs), and reported confidence in ability to consistently meet targets.

    Myth busted: A DRP must include every detail so anyone can execute recovery.

    A DRP is part of an overall business continuity plan

    A DRP is the set of procedures and supporting documentation that enables an organization to restore its core IT services (i.e. applications and infrastructure) as part of an overall business continuity plan (BCP), as described below. Use the templates, tools, and activities in this blueprint to create your DRP.

    Overall BCP
    IT DRP BCP for Each Business Unit Crisis Management Plan
    A plan to restore IT services (e.g. applications and infrastructure) following a disruption. This includes:
    • Identifying critical applications and dependencies.
    • Defining an appropriate (desired) recovery timeline based on a business impact analysis (BIA).
    • Creating a step-by-step incident response plan.
    A set of plans to resume business processes for each business unit. Info-Tech’s Develop a Business Continuity Plan blueprint provides a methodology for creating business unit BCPs as part of an overall BCP for the organization. A set of processes to manage a wide range of crises, from health and safety incidents to business disruptions to reputational damage. This includes emergency response plans, crisis communication plans, and the steps to invoke BC/DR plans when applicable. Info-Tech’s Implement Crisis Management Best Practices blueprint provides a structured approach to develop a crisis management process.

    Note: For DRP, we focus on business-facing IT services (as opposed to the underlying infrastructure), and then identify required infrastructure as dependencies (e.g. servers, databases, network).

    Take a practical but structured approach to creating a concise and effective DRP

    Image displayed shows the structure of this blueprint. It shows the structure of phases 1-4 and the related tools and templates for each phase.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful."

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

    Workshop

    “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

    Consulting

    “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Info-Tech advisory services deliver measurable value

    Info-Tech members save an average of $22,983 and 22 days by working with an Info-Tech analyst on DRP (based on client response data from Info-Tech Research Group’s Measured Value Survey, following analyst advisory on this blueprint).

    Why do members report value from analyst engagement?

    1. Expert advice on your specific situation to overcome obstacles and speed bumps.
    2. Structured project and guidance to stay on track.
    3. Project deliverables review to ensure the process is applied properly.

    Guided implementation overview

    Your trusted advisor is just a call away.

    Define DRP scope (Call 1)

    Scope requirements, objectives, and your specific challenges. Identify applications/ systems to focus on first.

    Define current status and system dependencies (Calls 2-3)

    Assess current DRP maturity. Identify system dependencies.

    Conduct a BIA (Calls 4-6)

    Create an impact scoring scale and conduct a BIA. Identify RTO and RPO for each system.

    Recovery workflow (Calls 7-8)

    Create a recovery workflow based on tabletop planning. Identify gaps in recovery capabilities.

    Projects and action items (Calls 9-10)

    Identify and prioritize improvements. Summarize results and plan next steps.

    Your guided implementations will pair you with an advisor from our analyst team for the duration of your DRP project.

    Workshop overview

    Contact your account representative or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Image displays the workshop overview for this blueprint. It is a workshop that runs for 4 days and covers various activities and produces many deliverables.

    End-user complaints distract from serious IT-based risks to business continuity

    Case Study

    Industry: Manufacturing
    Source: Info-Tech Research Group Client Engagement

    A global manufacturer with annual sales over $1B worked with Info-Tech to improve DR capabilities.

    DRP BIA

    Conversations with the IT team and business units identified the following impact of downtime over 24 hours:

    • Email: Direct Cost: $100k; Goodwill Impact Score: 8.5/16
    • ERP: Direct Cost: $1.35mm; Goodwill Impact Score: 12.5/16

    Tabletop Testing and Recovery Capabilities

    Reviewing the organization’s current systems recovery workflow identified the following capabilities:

    • Email: RTO: minutes, RPO: minutes
    • ERP: RTO: 14 hours, RPO: 24 hours

    Findings

    Because of end-user complaints, IT had invested heavily in email resiliency though email downtime had a relatively minimal impact on the business. After working through the methodology, it was clear that the business needed to provide additional support for critical systems.

    Insights at each step:

    Identify DR Maturity and System Dependencies

    Conduct a BIA

    Outline Incident Response and Recovery Workflow With Tabletop Exercises

    Mitigate Gaps and Risks

    Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan

    Phase 1

    Define DRP Scope, Current Status, and Dependencies

    Step 1.1: Set Scope, Kick-Off the DRP Project, and Create a Charter

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Establish a team for DR planning.
    • Retrieve and review existing, relevant documentation.
    • Create a project charter.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • DRP Coordinator
    • DRP Team (Key IT SMEs)
    • IT Managers

    Results and Insights

    • Set scope for the first iteration of the DRP methodology.
    • Don’t try to complete your DR and BCPs all at once.
    • Don’t bite off too much at once.

    Kick-off your DRP project

    You’re ready to start your DR project.

    This could be an annual review – but more likely, this is the first time you’ve reviewed the DR plan in years.* Maybe a failed audit might have provided a mandate for DR planning, or a real disaster might have highlighted gaps in DR capabilities. First, set appropriate expectations for what the project is and isn’t, in terms of scope, outputs, and resource commitments. Very few organizations can afford to hire a full-time DR planner, so it’s likely this won’t be your full-time job. Set objectives and timelines accordingly.

    Gather a team

    • Often, DR efforts are led by the infrastructure and operations leader. This person can act as the DRP coordinator or may delegate this role.
    • Key infrastructure subject-matter experts (SMEs) are usually part of the team and involved through the project.

    Find and review existing documentation

    • An existing DRP may have information you can re-purpose rather than re-create.
    • High-level architecture diagrams and network diagrams can help set scope (and will become part of your DR kit).
    • Current business-centric continuity of operations plans (COOPs) or BCPs are important to understand.

    Set specific, realistic objectives

    • Create a project charter (see next slide) to record objectives, timelines, and assumptions.
    *Only 20% of respondents to an Info-Tech Research Group survey (N=165) had a complete DRP; only 38% of respondents with a complete or mostly complete DRP felt it would be effective in a crisis.

    List DRP drivers and challenges

    1(a) Drivers and roadblocks

    Estimated Time: 30 minutes

    Identify the drivers and challenges to completing a functional DRP plan with the core DR team.

    DRP Drivers

    • Past outages (be specific):
      • Hardware and software failures
      • External network and power outages
      • Building damage
      • Natural disaster(s)
    • Audit findings
    • Events in the news
    • Other?

    DRP Challenges

    • Lack of time
    • Insufficient DR budget
    • Lack of executive support
    • No internal DRP expertise
    • Challenges making the case for DRP
    • Other?

    Write down insights from the meeting on flip-chart paper or a whiteboard and use the findings to inform your DRP project (e.g. challenges to address).

    Clarify expectations with a project charter

    1(b) DRP Project Charter Template

    DRP Project Charter Template components:

    Define project parameters, roles, and objectives, and clarify expectations with the executive team. Specific subsections are listed below and described in more detail in the remainder of this phase.

    • Project Overview: Includes objectives, deliverables, and scope. Leverage relevant notes from the “Project Drivers” brainstorming exercise (e.g. past outages and near misses which help make the case).
    • Governance and Management: Includes roles, responsibilities, and resource requirements.
    • Project Risks, Assumptions, and Constraints: Includes risks and mitigation strategies, as well as any assumptions and constraints.
    • Project Sign-Off: Includes IT and executive sign-off (if required).

    Note: Identify the initial team roles and responsibilities first so they can assist in defining the project charter.

    The image is a screenshot of the first page of the DRP Project Charter Template.

    Step 1.2: Assess Current State DRP Maturity

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Complete Info-Tech’s DRP Maturity Scorecard.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • DRP Coordinator
    • IT SMEs

    Results and Insights

    • Identify the current state of the organization’s DRP and continuity management. Set a baseline for improvement.
    • Discover where improvement is most needed to create an effective plan.

    Only 38% of IT departments believe their DRPs would be effective in a real crisis

    Even organizations with documented DRPs struggle to make them actionable.

    • Even when a DRP does become a priority (e.g. due to regulatory or customer drivers), the challenge is knowing where to start and having a methodical step-by-step process for doing the work. With no guide to plan and resource the project, it becomes work that you complete piecemeal when you aren’t working on other projects, or at night after the kids go to bed.
    • Far too many organizations create a document to satisfy auditors rather than creating a usable plan. People in this group often just want a fill-in-the-blanks template. What they will typically find is a template for the traditional 300-page manual that goes in a binder that sits on a shelf, is difficult to maintain, and is not effective in a crisis.
    Two bar graphs are displayed. The graph on the left shows that only 20% of survey respondents indicate they have a complete DRP. The graph on the right shows that 38% of those who have a mostly completed or full DRP actually feel it would be effective in a crisis.

    Use the DRP Maturity Scorecard to assess the current state of your DRP and identify areas to improve

    1(c) DRP Maturity Scorecard

    Info-Tech’s DRP Maturity Scorecard evaluates completion status and process maturity for a comprehensive yet practical assessment across three aspects of an effective DRP program – Defining Requirements, Implementation, and Maintenance.

    Image has three boxes. One is labelled Completion status, another below it is labelled Process Maturity. There is an addition sign in between them. With an arrow leading from both boxes is another box that is labelled DRP Maturity Assessment

    Completion Status: Reflects the progress made with each component of your DRP Program.

    Process Maturity: Reflects the consistency and quality of the steps executed to achieve your completion status.

    DRP Maturity Assessment: Each component (e.g. BIA) of your DRP Program is evaluated based on completion status and process maturity to provide an accurate holistic assessment. For example, if your BIA completion status is 4 out of 5, but process maturity is a 2, then requirements were not derived from a consistent defined process. The risk is inconsistent application prioritization and misalignment with actual business requirements.

    Step 1.3: Identify Applications, Systems, and Dependencies

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify systems, applications, and services, and the business units that use them.
    • Document applications, systems, and their dependencies in the DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • DRP Coordinator
    • DRP Team

    Results and Insights

    • Identify core services and the applications that depend on them.
    • Add applications and dependencies to the DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool.

    Select 5-10 services to get started on the DRP methodology

    1(d) High-level prioritization

    Estimated Time: 30 minutes

    Working through the planning process the first time can be challenging. If losing momentum is a concern, limit the BIA to a few critical systems to start.

    Run this exercise if you need a structured exercise to decide where to focus first and identify the business users you should ask for input on the impact of system downtime.

    1. On a whiteboard or flip-chart paper, list business units in a column on the left. List key applications/systems in a row at the top. Draw a grid.
    2. At a high level, review how applications are used by each unit. Take notes to keep track of any assumptions you make.
      • Add a ✓ if members of the unit use the application or system.
      • Add an ✱ if members of the unit are heavy users of the application or system and/or use it for time sensitive tasks.
      • Leave the box blank if the app isn’t used by this unit.
    3. Use the chart to prioritize systems to include in the BIA (e.g. systems marked with an *) but also include a few less-critical systems to illustrate DRP requirements for a range of systems.

    Image is an example of what one could complete from step 1(d). There is a table shown. In the column on the left lists sales, marketing, R&D, and Finance. In the top row, there is listed: dialer, ERP. CRM, Internet, analytics, intranet

    Application Notes
    CRM
    • Supports time-critical sales and billing processes.
    Dialer
    • Used for driving the sales-call queue, integration with CRM.

    Draw a high-level sketch of your environment

    1(e) Sketch your environment

    Estimated Time: 1-2 hours

    A high-level topology or architectural diagram is an effective way to identify dependencies, application ownership, outsourced services, hardware redundancies, and more.

    Note:

    • Network diagrams or high-level architecture diagrams help to identify dependencies and redundancies. Even a rough sketch is a useful reference tool for participants, and will be valuable documentation in the final DR plan.
    • Keep the drawings tidy. Visualize the final diagram before you start to draw on the whiteboard to help with spacing and placement.
    • Collaborate with relevant SMEs to identify dependencies. Keep the drawing high-level.
    • Illustrate connections between applications or components with lines. Use color coding to illustrate where applications are hosted (e.g. in-house, at a co-lo, in a cloud or MSP environment).
    Example of a high-level topology or architectural diagram

    Document systems and dependencies

    Collaborate with system SMEs to identify dependencies for each application or system. Document the dependencies in the DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool (see image below)

    • When listing applications, focus on business-facing systems or services that business users will recognize and use terminology they’ll understand.
    • Group infrastructure components that support all other services as a single core infrastructure service to simplify dependency mapping (e.g. core router, virtual hosts, ID management, and DNS).
    • In general, each data center will have its own core infrastructure components. List each data center separately – especially if different services are hosted at each data center.
    • Be specific when documenting dependencies. Use existing asset tracking tables, discovery tools, asset management records, or configuration management tools to identify specific server names.
    • Core infrastructure dependencies, such as the network infrastructure, power supply, and centralized storage, will be a common set of dependencies for most applications, so group these into a separate category called “Core Infrastructure” to minimize repetition in your DR planning.
    • Document production components in the BIA tool. Capture in-production, redundant components performing the same work on a single dependency line. List standby systems in the notes.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    In general, visual documentation is easier to use in a crisis and easier to maintain over time. Use Info-Tech’s research to help build your own visual SOPs.

    Document systems and dependencies

    1(f) DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool – Record systems and dependencies

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool.

    Stories from the field: Info-Tech clients find value in Phase 1 in the following ways

    An organization uncovers a key dependency that needed to be treated as a Tier 1 system

    Reviewing the entire ecosystem for applications identified key dependencies that were previously considered non-critical. For example, a system used to facilitate secure data transfers was identified as a key dependency for payroll and other critical business processes, and elevated to Tier 1.

    A picture’s worth a thousand words (and 1600 servers)

    Drawing a simple architectural diagram was an invaluable tool to identify key dependencies and critical systems, and to understand how systems and dependencies were interconnected. The drawing was an aha moment for IT and business stakeholders trying to make sense of their 1600-server environment.

    Make the case for DRP

    A member of the S&P 500 used Info-Tech’s DRP Maturity Scorecard to provide a reliable objective assessment and make the case for improvements to the board of directors.

    State government agency initiates a DRP project to complement an existing COOP

    Info-Tech's DRP Project Charter enabled the CIO to clarify their DRP project scope and where it fit into their overall COOP. The project charter example provided much of the standard copy – objectives, scope, project roles, methodology, etc. – required to outline the project.

    Phase 1: Insights and accomplishments

    Image has two screenshots from Info-Tech's Phase 1 tools and templates.

    Created a charter and identified current maturity

    Image has two screenshots. One is from Info-Tech's DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool and the other is from the example in step 1(d).

    Identified systems and dependencies for the BIA

    Summary of Accomplishments:

    • Created a DRP project charter.
    • Completed the DRP Maturity Scorecard and identified current DRP maturity.
    • Prioritized applications/systems for a first pass through DR planning.
    • Identified dependencies for each application and system.

    Up Next: Conduct a BIA to establish recovery requirements

    Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan

    Phase 2

    Conduct a BIA to Determine Acceptable RTOs and RPOs

    Step 2.1: Define an Objective Impact Scoring Scale

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Create a scoring scale to measure the business impact of application and system downtime.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • DRP Coordinator
    • DRP Team

    Results and Insights

    • Use a scoring scale tied to multiple categories of real business impact to develop a more objective assessment of application and system criticality.

    Align capabilities to appropriate and acceptable RTOs and RPOs with a BIA

    Too many organizations avoid a BIA because they perceive it as onerous or unneeded. A well-managed BIA is straightforward and the benefits are tangible.

    A BIA enables you to identify appropriate spend levels, maintain executive support, and prioritize DR planning for a more successful outcome. Info-Tech has found that a BIA has a measurable impact on the organization’s ability to set appropriate objectives and investment goals.

    Two bar graphs are depicted. The one on the left shows 93% BIA impact on appropriate RTOs. The graph on the right shows that with BIA, there is 86% on BIA impact on appropriate spending.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Business input is important, but don’t let a lack of it delay a draft BIA. Complete a draft based on your knowledge of the business. Create a draft within IT, and use it to get input from business leaders. It’s easier to edit estimates than to start from scratch; even weak estimates are far better than a blank sheet.

    Pick impact categories that are relevant to your business to develop a holistic view of business impact

    Direct Cost Impact Categories

    • Revenue: permanently lost revenue.
      • Example: one third of daily sales are lost due to a website failure.
    • Productivity: lost productivity.
      • Example: finance staff can’t work without the accounting system.
    • Operating costs: additional operating costs.
      • Example: temporary staff are needed to re-key data.
    • Financial penalties: fines/penalties that could be incurred due to downtime.
      • Example: failure to meet contractual service-level agreements (SLAs) for uptime results in financial penalties.

    Goodwill, Compliance, and Health and Safety Categories

    • Stakeholder goodwill: lost customer, staff, or business partner goodwill due to harm, frustration, etc.
      • Example: customers can’t access needed services because the website is down.
      • Example: a payroll system outage delays paychecks for all staff.
      • Example: suppliers are paid late because the purchasing system is down.
    • Compliance, health, and safety:
      • Example: financial system downtime results in a missed tax filing.
      • Example: network downtime disconnects security cameras.

    Info-Tech Insight

    You don’t have to include every impact category in your BIA. Include categories that could affect your business. Defer or exclude other categories. For example, the bulk of revenue for governmental organizations comes from taxes, which won’t be permanently lost if IT systems fail.

    Modify scoring criteria to help you measure the impact of downtime

    The scoring scales define different types of business impact (e.g. costs, lost goodwill) using a common four-point scale and 24-hour timeframe to simplify BIA exercises and documentation.

    Use the suggestions below as a guide as you modify scoring criteria in the DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool:

    • All the direct cost categories (revenue, productivity, operating costs, financial penalties) require the user to define only a maximum value; the tool will populate the rest of the criteria for that category. Use the suggestions below to find the maximum scores for each of the direct cost categories:
      • Revenue: Divide total revenue for the previous year by 365 to estimate daily revenue. Assume this is the most revenue you could lose in a day, and use this number as the top score.
      • Loss of Productivity: Divide fully-loaded labor costs for the organization by 365 to estimate daily productivity costs. Use this as a proxy measure for the work lost if all business stopped for one day.
      • Increased Operating Costs: Isolate this to known additional costs that result from a disruption (e.g. costs for overtime or temporary staff). Estimate the maximum cost for the organization.
      • Financial Penalties: Isolate this to known financial penalties (e.g. due to failure to meet SLAs or compliance requirements). Use the estimated maximum penalty as the highest value on the scale.
    • Impact on Goodwill: Use an estimate of the percentage of all stakeholders impacted to assess goodwill impact.
    • Impact on Compliance; Impact on Health and Safety: The BIA tool contains default scoring criteria that account for the severity of the impact, the likelihood of occurrence, and in the case of compliance, whether a grace period is available. Use this scale as-is, or adapt this scale to suit your needs.

    Modify the default scoring scale in the DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool to reflect your organization

    2(a) DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool – Scoring criteria


    A screenshot of Info-Tech's DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool's scoring criteria

    Step 2.2: Estimate the Impact of Downtime

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify the business impact of service/system/application downtime.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • DRP Coordinator
    • DRP Team
    • IT Service SMEs
    • Business-Side Technology Owners (optional)

    Results and Insights

    • Apply the scoring scale to develop a more objective assessment of the business impact of downtime.
    • Create criticality tiers based on the business impact of downtime.

    Estimate the impact of downtime for each system and application

    2(b) Estimate the impact of systems downtime

    Estimated Time: 3 hours

    On tab 3 of the DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool indicate the costs of downtime, as described below:

    1. Have a copy of the “Scoring Criteria” tab available to use as a reference (e.g. printed or on a second display). In tab 3 use the drop-down menu to assign a score of 0 to 4 based on levels of impact defined in the “Scoring Criteria” tab.
    2. Work horizontally across all categories for a single system or application. This will familiarize you with your scoring scales for all impact categories, and allow you to modify the scoring scales if needed before you proceed much further.
    3. For example, if a core call center phone system was down:

    • Loss of Revenue would be the portion of sales revenue generated through the call center. This might score a 1 or 2 depending on the percent of sales that are processed by the call center.
    • The Impact on Customers might be a 2 or 3 depending on the extent that some customers might be using the call center to receive support or purchase new products or services.
    • The Legal/Regulatory Compliance and Health or Safety Risk might be a 0, as the call center has no impact in either area.
  • Next, work vertically across all applications or systems within a single impact category. This will allow you to compare scores within the category as you create them to ensure internal consistency.
  • Add impact scores to the DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool

    2(c) DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool

    Screenshot of Info-Tech's DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool

    Record business reasons and assumptions that drive BIA scores

    2(d) DRP BIA Scoring Context Example

    Info-Tech suggests that IT leadership and staff identify the impact of downtime first to create a version that you can then validate with relevant business owners. As you work through the BIA as a team, have a notetaker record assumptions you make to help you explain the results and drive business engagement and feedback.

    Some common assumptions:

    • You can’t schedule a disaster, so Info-Tech suggests you assume the worst possible timing for downtime. Base the impact of downtime on the worst day for a disaster (e.g. year-end close, payroll run).
    • Record assumptions made about who and what are impacted by system downtime.
    • Record assumptions made about impact severity.
    • If you deviate from the scoring scale, or if a particular impact doesn’t fit well into the defined scoring scale, document the exception.

    Screenshot of Info-Tech's DRP BIA Scoring Context Example

    Use Info-Tech’s DRP BIA Scoring Context Example as a note-taking template.

    Info-Tech Insight

    You can’t build a perfect scoring scale. It’s fine to make reasonable assumptions based on your judgment and knowledge of the business. Just write down your assumptions. If you don’t write them down, you’ll forget how you arrived at that conclusion.

    Assign a criticality rating based on total direct and indirect costs of downtime

    2(e) DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool – Assign criticality tiers

    Once you’ve finished estimating the impact of downtime, use the following rough guideline to create an initial sort of applications into Tiers 1, 2, and 3.

    1. In general, sort applications based on the Total Impact on Goodwill, Compliance, and Safety first.
      • An effective tactic for a quick sort: assign a Tier 1 rating where scores are 50% or more of the highest total score, Tier 2 where scores are between 25% and 50%, and Tier 3 where scores are below 25%. Some organizations will also include a Tier 0 for the highest-scoring systems.
      • Then review and validate these scores and assignments.
    2. Next, consider the Total Cost of Downtime.
      • The Total Cost is calculated by the tool based on the Scoring Criteria in tab 2 and the impact scores on tab 3.
      • Decide if the total cost impact justifies increasing the criticality rating (e.g. from Tier 2 to Tier 1 due to high cost impact).
    3. Review the assigned impact scores and tiers to check that they’re in alignment. If you need to make an exception, document why. Keep exceptions to a minimum.

    Example: Highest total score is 12

    Screenshot of Info-Tech's DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool

    Step 2.3: Determine Acceptable RTO/RPO Targets

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Review the “Debate Space” approach to setting RTO and RPO (recovery targets).
    • Set preliminary RTOs and RPOs by criticality tier.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • DRP Coordinator
    • DRP Team

    Results and Insights

    • Align recovery targets with the business impact of downtime and data loss.

    Use the “Debate Space” approach to align RTOs and RPOs with the impact of downtime

    The business must validate acceptable and appropriate RTOs and RPOs, but IT can use the guidelines below to set an initial estimate.

    Right-size recovery.

    A shorter RTO typically requires higher investment. If a short period of downtime has minimal impact, setting a low RTO may not be justifiable. As downtime continues, impact begins to increase exponentially to a point where downtime is intolerable – an acceptable RTO must be shorter than this. Apply the same thinking to RPOs – how much data loss is unnoticeable? How much is intolerable?

    A diagram to show the debate space in relation to RTOs and RPOs

    The “Debate Space” is between minimal impact and maximum tolerance for downtime.

    Estimate appropriate, acceptable RTOs and RPOs for each tier

    2(f) Set recovery targets

    Estimated Time: 30 minutes

    RTO and RPO tiers simplify management by setting similar recovery goals for systems and applications with similar criticality.

    Use the “Debate Space” approach to set appropriate and acceptable targets.

    1. For RTO, establish a recovery time range that is appropriate based on impact.
      • Overall, the RTO tiers might be 0-4 hours for gold, 4-24 hours for silver, and 24-48 hours for bronze.
    2. RPOs reflect target data protection measures.
      • Identify the lowest RPO within a tier and make that the standard.
      • For example, RPO for gold data might be five minutes, silver might be four hours, and bronze might be one day.
      • Use this as a guideline. RPO doesn’t always align perfectly with RTO tiers.
    3. Review RTOs and RPOs and make sure they accurately reflect criticality.

    Info-Tech Insight

    In general, the more critical the system, the shorter the RPO. But that’s not always the case. For example, a service bus might be Tier 1, but if it doesn’t store any data, RPO might be longer than other Tier 1 systems. Some systems may have a different RPO than most other systems in that tier. As long as the targets are acceptable to the business and appropriate given the impact, that’s okay.

    Add recovery targets to the DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool

    2(g) DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool – Document recovery objectives

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool – Document recovery objectives

    Stories from the field: Info-Tech clients find value in Phase 2 in the following ways

    Most organizations discover something new about key applications, or the way stakeholders use them, when they work through the BIA and review the results with stakeholders. For example:

    Why complete a BIA? There could be a million reasons

    • A global manufacturer completed the DRP BIA exercise. When email went down, Service Desk phones lit up until it was resolved. That grief led to a high availability implementation for email. However, the BIA illustrated that ERP downtime was far more impactful.
    • ERP downtime would stop production lines, delay customer orders, and ultimately cost the business a million dollars a day.
    • The BIA results clearly showed that the ERP needed to be prioritized higher, and required business support for investment.

    Move from airing grievances to making informed decisions

    The DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool helped structure stakeholder consultations on DR requirements for a large university IT department. Past consultations had become an airing of grievances. Using objective impact scores helped stakeholders stay focused and make informed decisions around appropriate RTOs and RPOs.

    Phase 2: Insights and accomplishments

    Screenshots of the tools and templates from this phase.

    Estimated the business impact of downtime

    Screenshot of a tools from this phase

    Set recovery targets

    Summary of Accomplishments

    • Created a scoring scale tied to different categories of business impact.
    • Applied the scoring scale to estimate the business impact of system downtime.
    • Identified appropriate, acceptable RTOs and RPOs.

    Up Next:Conduct a tabletop planning exercise to establish current recovery capabilities

    Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan

    Phase 3

    Identify and Address Gaps in the Recovery Workflow

    Step 3.1: Determine Current Recovery Workflow

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Run a tabletop exercise.
    • Outline the steps for the initial response (notification, assessment, disaster declaration) and systems recovery (i.e. document your recovery workflow).
    • Identify any gaps and risks in your initial response and systems recovery.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • DRP Coordinator
    • IT Infrastructure SMEs (for systems in scope)
    • Application SMEs (for systems in scope)

    Results and Insights

    • Use a repeatable practical exercise to outline and document the steps you would use to recover systems in the event of a disaster, as well as identify gaps and risks to address.
    • This is also a knowledge-sharing opportunity for your team, and a practical means to get their insights, suggestions, and recovery knowledge down on paper.

    Tabletop planning: an effective way to test and document your recovery workflow

    In a tabletop planning exercise, the DRP team walks through a disaster scenario to map out what should happen at each stage, and effectively defines a high-level incident response plan (i.e. recovery workflow).

    Tabletop planning had the greatest impact on meeting recovery objectives (RTOs/RPOs) among survey respondents.

    A bar graph is displayed that shows that tabletop planning has the greatest impact on meeting recovery objectives (RTOs/RPOs) among survey respondents.

    *Note: Relative importance indicates the contribution an individual testing methodology, conducted at least annually, had on predicting success meeting recovery objectives, when controlling for all other types of tests in a regression model. The relative-importance values have been standardized to sum to 100%.

    Success was based on the following items:

    • RTOs are consistently met.
    • IT has confidence in the ongoing ability to meet RTOs.
    • RPOs are consistently met.
    • IT has confidence in the ongoing ability to meet RPOs.

    Why is tabletop planning so effective?

    • It enables you to play out a wider range of scenarios than technology-based testing (e.g. full-scale, parallel) due to cost and complexity factors.
    • It is non-intrusive, so it can be executed more frequently than other testing methodologies.
    • It easily translates into the backbone of your recovery documentation, as it allows you to review all aspects of your recovery plan.

    Focus first on IT DR

    Your DRP is IT contingency planning. It is not crisis management or BCP.

    The goal is to define a plan to restore applications and systems following a disruption. For your first tabletop exercise, Info-Tech recommends you use a non-life-threatening scenario that requires at least a temporary relocation of your data center (i.e. failing over to a DR site/environment). Assume a gas leak or burst water pipe renders the data center inaccessible. Power is shut off and IT must failover systems to another location. Once you create the master procedure, review the plan to ensure it addresses other scenarios.

    Info-Tech Insight

    When systems fail, you are faced with two high-level options: failover or recover in place. If you document the plan to failover systems to another location, you’ll have documented the core of your DR procedures. This differs from traditional scenario planning where you define separate plans for different what-if scenarios. The goal is one plan that can be adapted to different scenarios, which reduces the effort to build and maintain your DRP.

    Conduct a tabletop planning exercise to outline DR procedures in your current environment

    3(a) Tabletop planning

    Estimated Time: 2-3 hours

    For each high-level recovery step, do the following:

    1. On white cue cards:
      • Record the step.
      • Indicate the task owner (if required for clarity).
      • Note time required to complete the step. After the exercise, use this to build a running recovery time where 00:00 is when the incident occurred.
    2. On yellow cue cards, document gaps in people, process, and technology requirements to complete the step.
    3. On red cue cards, indicate risks (e.g. no backup person for a key staff member).
    An example is shown on what can be done during step 3(a). Three cue cards are showing in white, yellow, and red.

    Do:

    • Review the complete workflow from notification all the way to user acceptance testing.
    • Keep focused; stay on task and on time.
    • Revisit each step and record gaps and risks (and known solutions, but don’t dwell on this).
    • Revise and improve the plan with task owners.

    Don't:

    • Get weighed down by tools.
    • Document the details right away – stick to the high-level plan for the first exercise.
    • Try to find solutions to every gap/risk as you go. Save in-depth research/discussion for later.

    Flowchart the current-state incident response plan (i.e. document the recovery workflow)

    3(b) DRP Recovery Workflow Template and Case Study: Practical, Right-Sized DRP

    Why use flowcharts?

    • Flowcharts provide an at-a-glance view, ideal for disaster scenarios where pressure is high and quick upward communication is necessary.
    • For experienced staff, a high-level reminder of key steps is sufficient.

    Use the completed tabletop planning exercise results to build this workflow.

    "We use flowcharts for our declaration procedures. Flowcharts are more effective when you have to explain status and next steps to upper management." – Assistant Director, IT Operations, Healthcare Industry

    Source: Info-Tech Research Group Interview

    Screenshot of Info-Tech's DRP Recovery Workflow Template

    For a formatted template you can use to capture your plan, see Info-Tech’s DRP Recovery Workflow Template.

    For a completed example of tabletop planning results, review Info-Tech’s Case Study: Practical, Right-Sized DRP.

    Identify RPA

    What’s my RPA? Consider the following case:

    • Once a week, a full backup is taken of the complete ERP system and is transferred over the WAN to a secondary site 250 miles away, where it is stored on disk.
    • Overnight, an incremental backup is taken of the day’s changes, and is transferred to the same secondary site, and also stored on disk.
    • During office hours, the SAN takes a snapshot of changes which are kept on local storage (information on the accounting system usually only changes during office hours).
    • So what’s the RPA? One hour (snapshots), one day (incrementals), or one week (full backups)?

    When identifying RPA, remember the following:

    You are planning for a disaster scenario, where on-site systems may be inaccessible and any copies of data taken during the disaster may fail, be corrupt, or never make it out of the data center (e.g. if the network fails before the backup file ships). In the scenario above, it seems likely that off-site incremental backups could be restored, leading to a 24-hour RPA. However, if there were serious concerns about the reliability of the daily incrementals, the RPA could arguably be based on the weekly full backups.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    The RPA is a commitment to the maximum data you would lose in a DR scenario with current capabilities (people, process, and technology). Pick a number you can likely achieve. List any situations where you couldn’t meet this RPA, and identify those for a risk tolerance discussion. In the example above, complete loss of the primary SAN would also mean losing the snapshots, so the last good copy of the data could be up to 24-hours old.

    Add recovery actuals (RTA/RPA) to your copy of the BIA

    3(c) DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool– Recovery actuals

    On the “Impact Analysis” tab in the DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool, enter the estimated maximum downtime and data loss in the RTA and RPA columns.

    1. Estimate the RTA based on the required time for complete recovery. Review your recovery workflow to identify this timeline. For example, if the notification, assessment, and declaration process takes two hours, and systems recovery requires most of a day, the estimated RTA could be 24 hours.
    2. Estimate the RPA based on the longest interval between copies of the data being shipped offsite. For example, if data on a particular system is backed up offsite once per day, and the onsite system was destroyed just before that backup began, the entire day’s data could be lost and estimated RPA could be 24 hours. Note: Enter 9999 to indicate that data is unrecoverable.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool – Recovery actuals

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    It’s okay to round numbers to the nearest shift, day, or week for simplicity (e.g. 24 hours rather than 22.5 hours, or 8 hours rather than 7.25 hours).

    Test the recovery workflow against additional scenarios

    3(d) Workflow review

    Estimated Time: 1 hour

    Review your recovery workflow with a different scenario in mind.

    • Work from and update the soft copy of your recovery workflow.
    • Would any steps be different if the scenario changes? If yes, capture the different flow with a decision diamond. Identify any new gaps or risks you encounter with red and yellow cards. Use as few decision diamonds as possible.

    Screenshot of testing the workflow against the additional scenarios

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    As you start to consider scenarios where injuries or loss of life are a possibility, remember that health and safety risks are the top priority in a crisis. If there’s a fire in the data center, evacuating the building is the first priority, even if that means foregoing a graceful shut down. For more details on emergency response and crisis management, see Implement Crisis Management Best Practices.

    Consider additional IT disaster scenarios

    3(e) Thought experiment – Review additional scenarios

    Walk through your recovery workflow in the context of additional, different scenarios to ensure there are no gaps. Collaborate with your DR team to identify changes that might be required, and incorporate these changes in the plan.

    Scenario Type Considerations
    Isolated hardware/software failure
    • Failover to the DR site may not be necessary (or only for affected systems).
    Power outage or network outage
    • Do you have standby power? Do you have network redundancy?
    Local hazard (e.g. chemical leak, police incident)
    • Systems might be accessible remotely, but hands-on maintenance will be required eventually.
    • An alternate site is required for service continuity.
    Equipment/building damage (e.g. fire, roof collapse)
    • Staff injuries or loss of life are a possibility.
    • Equipment may need repair or replacement (vendor involvement).
    • An alternate site is required for service continuity.
    Regional natural disasters
    • Staff injuries or loss of life are a possibility.
    • Utilities may be affected (power, running water, etc.).
    • Expect staff to take care of their families first before work.
    • A geographically distant alternate site may be required for service continuity.

    Step 3.2: Identify and Prioritize Projects to Close Gaps

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Analyze the gaps that were identified from the maturity scorecard, tabletop planning exercise, and the RTO/RPO gaps analysis.
    • Brainstorm solutions to close gaps and mitigate risks.
    • Determine a course of action to close these gaps. Prioritize each project. Create a project implementation timeline.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • DRP Coordinator
    • IT Infrastructure SMEs

    Results and Insights

    • Prioritized list of projects and action items that can improve DR capabilities.
    • Often low-cost, low-effort quick wins are identified to mitigate at least some gaps/risks. Higher-cost, higher-effort projects can be part of a longer-term IT strategy. Improving service continuity is an ongoing commitment.

    Brainstorm solutions to address gaps and risk

    3(f) Solutioning

    Estimated Time: 1.5 hours

    1. Review each of the risk and gap cards from the tabletop exercise.
    2. As a group, brainstorm ideas to address gaps, mitigate risks, and improve resiliency. Write the list of ideas on a whiteboard or flip-chart paper. The solutions can range from quick-wins and action items to major capital investments.
    3. Try to avoid debates about feasibility at this point – that should happen later. The goal is to get all ideas on the board.

    An example of how to complete Activity 3(f). Three cue cards showing various steps are attached by arrows to steps on a whiteboard.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    It’s about finding ways to solve the problem, not about solving the problem. When you’re brainstorming solutions to problems, don’t stop with the first idea, even if the solution seems obvious. The first idea isn’t always the best or only solution; other ideas can expand on and improve that first idea.

    Select an optimal DR deployment model from a world of choice

    There are many options for a DR deployment. What makes sense for you?

    • Sifting through the options for a DR site can be overwhelming. Simplify by eliminating deployment models that aren’t a good fit for your requirements or organization using Info-Tech’s research.
    • Someone will ask you about DR in the cloud. Cut to the chase and evaluate cloud for fit with your organization’s current capabilities and requirements. Read about the 10 Secrets for Successful DR in the Cloud.
    • Selecting and deploying a DR site is an exercise in risk mitigation. IT’s role is to advise the business on options to address the risk of not having a DR site, including cost and effort estimates. The business must then decide how to manage risk. Build total cost of ownership (TCO) estimates and evaluate possible challenges and risks for each option.

    Is it practical to invest in greater geo-redundancy that meets RTOs and RPOs during a widespread event?

    Info-Tech suggests you consider events that impact both sites, and your risk tolerance for that impact. Outline the impact of downtime at a high level if both the primary and secondary site were affected. Research how often events severe enough to have impacted both your primary and secondary sites have occurred in the past. What’s the business tolerance for this type of event?

    A common strategy: have a primary and DR site that are close enough to support low RPO/RTO, but far enough away to mitigate the impact of known regional events. Back up data to a remote third location as protection against a catastrophic event.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Approach site selection as a project. Leverage Select an Optimal Disaster Recovery Deployment Model to structure your own site-selection project.

    Set up the DRP Roadmap Tool

    3(g) DRP Roadmap Tool – Set up tool

    Use the DRP Roadmap Tool to create a high-level roadmap to plan and communicate DR action items and initiatives. Determine the data you’ll use to define roadmap items.

    Screenshot of Info-Tech's DRP Roadmap Tool

    Plan next steps by estimating timeline, effort, priority, and more

    3(h) DRP Roadmap Tool – Describe roadmap items

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's DRP Roadmap Tool to show how to describe roadmap items

    Review and communicate the DRP Roadmap Tool

    3(i) DRP Roadmap Tool – View roadmap chart

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's DRP Roadmap Tool's Roadmap tab

    Step 3.3: Review the Future State Recovery Process

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Update the recovery workflow to outline your future recovery procedure.
    • Summarize findings from DR exercises and present the results to the project sponsor and other interested executives.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • DRP Coordinator
    • IT SMEs (Future State Recovery Flow)
    • DR Project Sponsor

    Results and Insights

    • Summarize results from DR planning exercises to make the case for needed DR investment.

    Outline your future state recovery flow

    3(j) Update the recovery workflow to outline response and recovery in the future

    Estimated Time: 30 minutes

    Outline your expected future state recovery flow to demonstrate improvements once projects and action items have been completed.

    1. Create a copy of your DRP recovery workflow in a new tab in Visio.
    2. Delete gap and risk cards that are addressed by proposed projects. Consolidate or eliminate steps that would be simplified or streamlined in the future if projects are implemented.
    3. Create a short-, medium-, and long-term review of changes to illustrate improvements over time to the project roadmap.
    4. Update this workflow as you implement and improve DR capabilities.

    Screenshot of the recovery workflow

    Validate recovery targets and communicate actual recovery capabilities

    3(k) Validate findings, present recommendations, secure budget

    Estimated Time: time required will vary

    1. Interview managers or process owners to validate RTO, RPO, and business impact scores.Use your assessment of “heavy users” of particular applications (picture at right) to remind you which business users you should include in the interview process.
    2. Present an overview of your findings to the management team.Use Info-Tech’s DRP Recap and Results Template to summarize your findings.
    3. Take projects into the budget process.With the management team aware of the rationale for investment in DRP, build the business case and secure budget where needed.

    Present DRP findings and make the case for needed investment

    3(I) DRP Recap and Results Template

    Create a communication deck to recap key findings for stakeholders.

    • Write a clear problem statement. Identify why you did this project (what problem you’re solving).
    • Clearly state key findings, insights, and recommendations.
    • Leverage the completed tools and templates to populate the deck. Callouts throughout the template presentation will direct you to take and populate screenshots throughout the document.
    • Use the presentation to communicate key findings to, and gather feedback from, business unit managers, executives, and IT staff.
    Screenshots of Info-Tech's DRP Recap and Results Template

    Stories from the field: Info-Tech clients find value in Phase 3 in the following ways

    Tabletop planning is an effective way to discover gaps in recovery capabilities. Identify issues in the tabletop exercise so you can manage them before disaster strikes. For example:

    Back up a second…

    A client started to back up application data offsite. To minimize data transfer and storage costs, the systems themselves weren’t backed up. Working through the restore process at the DR site, the DBA realized 30 years of COBOL and SQR code – critical business functionality – wasn’t backed up offsite.

    Net… work?

    A 500-employee professional services firm realized its internet connection could be a significant roadblock to recovery. Without internet, no one at head office could access critical cloud systems. The tabletop exercise identified this recovery bottleneck and helped prioritize the fix on the roadmap.

    Someone call a doctor!

    Hospitals rely on their phone systems for system downtime procedures. A tabletop exercise with a hospital client highlighted that if the data center were damaged, the phone system would likely be damaged as well. Identifying this provided more urgency to the ongoing VOIP migration.

    The test of time

    A small municipality relied on a local MSP to perform systems restore, but realized it had never tested the restore procedure to identify RTA. Contacting the MSP to review capabilities became a roadmap item to address this risk.

    Phase 3: Insights and accomplishments

    Screenshot of Info-Tech's DRP recovery workflow template

    Outlined the DRP response and risks to recovery

    Screenshots of activities completed related to brainstorming risk mitigation measures.

    Brainstormed risk mitigation measures

    Summary of Accomplishments

    • Planned and documented your DR incident response and systems recovery workflow.
    • Identified gaps and risks to recovery and incident management.
    • Brainstormed and identified projects and action items to mitigate risks and close gaps.

    Up Next: Leverage the core deliverables to complete, extend, and maintain your DRP

    Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan

    Phase 4

    Complete, Extend, and Maintain Your DRP

    Phase 4: Complete, Extend, and Maintain Your DRP

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify progress made on your DRP by reassessing your DRP maturity.
    • Prioritize the highest value major initiatives to complete, extend, and maintain your DRP.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • DRP Coordinator
    • Executive Sponsor

    Results and Insights

    • Communicate the value of your DRP by demonstrating progress against items in the DRP Maturity Scorecard.
    • Identify and prioritize future major initiatives to support the DRP, and the larger BCP.

    Celebrate accomplishments, plan for the future

    Congratulations! You’ve completed the core DRP deliverables and made the case for investment in DR capabilities. Take a moment to celebrate your accomplishments.

    This milestone is an opportunity to look back and look forward.

    • Look back: measure your progress since you started to build your DRP. Revisit the assessments completed in phase 1, and assess the change in your overall DRP maturity.
    • Look forward: prioritize future initiatives to complete, extend, and maintain your DRP. Prioritize initiatives that are the highest impact for the least requirement of effort and resources.

    We have completed the core DRP methodology for key systems:

    • BIA, recovery objectives, high-level recovery workflow, and recovery actuals.
    • Identify key tasks to meet recovery objectives.

    What could we do next?

    • Repeat the core methodology for additional systems.
    • Identify a DR site to meet recovery requirements, and review vendor DR capabilities.
    • Create a summary DRP document including requirements, capabilities, and change procedures.
    • Create a test plan and detailed recovery documentation.
    • Coordinate the creation of BCPs.
    • Integrate DR in other key operational processes.

    Revisit the DRP Maturity Scorecard to measure progress and identify remaining areas to improve

    4(a) DRP Maturity Scorecard – Reassess your DRP program maturity

    1. Find the copy of the DRP Maturity Scorecard you completed previously. Save a second copy of the completed scorecard in the same folder.
    2. Update scoring where you have improved your DRP documentation or capabilities.
    3. Review the new scores on tab 3. Compare the new scores to the original scores.

    Screenshot of DRP Maturity Assessment Results

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Use the completed, updated DRP Maturity Scorecard to demonstrate the value of your continuity program, and to help you decide where to focus next.

    Prioritize major initiatives to complete, extend, and maintain the DRP

    4(b) Prioritize major initiatives

    Estimated Time: 2 hours

    Prioritize major initiatives that mitigate significant risk with the least cost and effort.

    1. Use the scoring criteria below to evaluate risk, effort, and cost for potential initiatives. Modify the criteria if required for your organization. Write this out on a whiteboard or flip-chart paper.
    2. Assign a score from 1 to 3. Multiply the scores for each initiative together for an aggregate score. In general, prioritize initiatives with higher scores.
    Score A: How significant are the risks this initiative will mitigate? B: How easily can we complete this initiative? C: How cost-effective is this initiative?
    3: High Critical impact on +50% of stakeholders, or major impact to compliance posture, or significant health/safety risk. One sprint, can be completed by a few individuals with minor supervision. Within the IT discretionary budget.
    2: Medium Impacts <50% of stakeholders, or minor impact on compliance, or degradation to health or safety controls. One quarter, and/or some increased effort required, some risk to completion. Requires budget approval from finance.
    1: Low Impacts limited to <25% of stakeholders, no impact on compliance posture or health/safety. One year, and/or major vendor or organizational challenges. Requires budget approval from the board of directors.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    You can use a similar scoring exercise to prioritize and schedule high-benefit, low-effort, low-cost items identified in the roadmap in phase 3.

    Example: Prioritize major initiatives

    4(b) Prioritize major initiatives continued

    Write out the table on a whiteboard (record the results in a spreadsheet for reference). In the case below, IT might decide to work on repeating the core methodology first as they create the active testing plans, and tackle process changes later.

    Initiative A: How significant are the risks this initiative will mitigate? B: How easily can we complete this initiative? C: How cost-effective is this initiative? Aggregate score (A x B x C)
    Repeat the core methodology for all systems 2 – will impact some stakeholders, no compliance or safety impact. 2 – will require about 3 months, no significant complications. 3 – No cost. 12
    Add DR to project mgmt. and change mgmt. 1 – Mitigates some recovery risks over the long term. 1 – Requires extensive consultation and process review. 3 – No cost. 3
    Active failover testing on plan 2 – Mitigates some risks; documentation and cross training is already in place. 2 – Requires 3-4 months of occasional effort to prepare for test. 2 – May need to purchase some equipment before testing. 8

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Find a pace that allows you to keep momentum going, but also leaves enough time to act on the initial findings, projects, and action items identified in the DRP Roadmap Tool. Include these initiatives in the Roadmap tool to visualize how identified initiatives fit with other tasks identified to improve your recovery capabilities.

    Repeat the core DR methodology for additional systems and applications


    You have created a DR plan for your most critical systems. Now, add the rest:

    • Build on the work you’ve already done. Re-use the BIA scoring scale. Update your existing recovery workflows, rather than creating and formatting an entirely new document. A number of steps in the recovery will be shared with, or similar to, the recovery procedures for your Tier 1 systems.

    Risks and Challenges Mitigated

    • DR requirements and capabilities for less-critical systems have not been evaluated.
    • Gaps in the recovery process for less critical systems have not been evaluated or addressed.
    • DR capabilities for less critical systems may not meet business requirements.
    Sample Outputs
    Add Tier 2 & 3 systems to the BIA.
    Complete another tabletop exercise for Tier 2 & 3 systems recovery, and add the results to the recovery workflow.
    Identify projects to close additional gaps in the recovery process. Add projects to the project roadmap.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Use this example of a complete, practical, right-size DR plan to drive and guide your efforts.

    Extend your core DRP deliverables

    You’ve completed the core DRP deliverables. Continue to create DRP documentation to support recovery procedures and governance processes:

    • DR documentation efforts fail when organizations try to boil the ocean with an all-in-one plan aimed at auditors, business leaders, and IT. It’s long, hard to maintain, and ends up as shelfware.
    • Create documentation in layers to keep it manageable. Build supporting documentation over time to support your high-level recovery workflow.

    Risks and Challenges Mitigated

    • Key contact information, escalation, and disaster declaration responsibilities are not identified or formalized.
    • DRP requirements and capabilities aren’t centralized. Key DRP findings are in multiple documents, complicating governance and oversight by auditors, executives, and board members.
    • Detailed recovery procedures and peripheral information (e.g. network diagrams) are not documented.
    Sample Outputs
    Three to five detailed systems recovery flowcharts/checklists.
    Documented team roles, succession plans, and contact information.
    Notification, assessment, and disaster declaration plan.
    DRP summary.
    Layer 1, 2 & 3 network diagrams.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Use this example of a complete, practical, right-size DR plan to drive and guide your efforts.

    Select an optimal DR deployment model and deployment site

    Your DR site has been identified as inadequate:

    • Begin with the end in mind. Commit to mastering the selected model and leverage your vendor relationship for effective DR.
    • Cut to the chase and evaluate the feasibility of cloud first. Gauge your organization’s current capabilities for DR in the cloud before becoming infatuated with the idea.
    • A mixed model gives you the best of both worlds. Diversify your strategy by identifying fit for purpose and balancing the work required to maintain various models.

    Risks and Challenges Mitigated

    • Without an identified DR site, you’ll be scrambling when a disaster hits to find and contract for a location to restore IT services.
    • Without systems and application data backed up offsite, you stand to lose critical business data and logic if all copies of the data at your primary site were lost.
    Sample Outputs
    Application assessment for cloud DR.
    TCO tool for different environments.
    Solution decision and executive presentation.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Use Info-Tech’s blueprint, Select the Optimal Disaster Recovery Deployment Model, to help you make sense of a world of choice for your DR site.

    Extend DRP findings to business process resiliency with a BCP pilot

    Integrate your findings from DRP into the overall BCP:

    • As an IT leader you have the skillset and organizational knowledge to lead a BCP project, but ultimately business leaders need to own the BCP – they know their processes and requirements to resume business operations better than anyone else.
    • The traditional approach to BCP is a massive project that most organizations can’t execute without hiring a consultant. To execute BCP in-house, carve up the task into manageable pieces.

    Risks and Challenges Mitigated

    • No formal plan exists to recover from a disruption to critical business processes.
    • Business requirements for IT systems recovery may change following a comprehensive review of business continuity requirements.
    • Outside of core systems recovery, IT could be involved in relocating staff, imaging and issuing new end-user equipment, etc. Identifying these requirements is part of BCP.
    Sample Outputs
    Business process-focused BIA for one business unit.
    Recovery workflows for one business unit.
    Provisioning list for one business unit.
    BCP project roadmap.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Use Info-Tech’s blueprint, Develop a Business Continuity Plan, to develop and deploy a repeatable BCP methodology.

    Test the plan to validate capabilities and cross-train staff on recovery procedures

    You don’t have a program to regularly test the DR plan:

    • Most DR tests are focused solely on the technology and not the DR management process – which is where most plans fail.
    • Be proactive – establish an annual test cycle and identify and coordinate resources well in advance.
    • Update DRP documentation with findings from the plan, and track the changes you make over time.

    Risks and Challenges Mitigated

    • Gaps likely still exist in the plan that are hard to find without some form of testing.
    • Customers and auditors may ask for some form of DR testing.
    • Staff may not be familiar with DR documentation or how they can use it.
    • No formal cycle to validate and update the DRP.
    Sample Outputs
    DR testing readiness assessment.
    Testing handbooks.
    Test plan summary template.
    DR test issue log and analysis tool.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Uncover deficiencies in your recovery procedures by using Info-Tech’s blueprint Reduce Costly Downtime Through DR Testing.

    “Operationalize” DRP management

    Inject DR planning in key operational processes to support plan maintenance:

    • Major changes, or multiple routine changes, can materially alter DR capabilities and requirements. It’s not feasible to update the DR plan after every routine change, so leverage criticality tiers in the BIA to focus your change management efforts. Critical systems require more rigorous change procedures.
    • Likewise, you can build criticality tiers into more focused project management and performance measurement processes.
    • Schedule regular tasks in your ticketing system to verify capabilities and cross-train staff on key recovery procedures (e.g. backup and restore).

    Risks and Challenges Mitigated

    • DRP is not updated “as needed” – as requirements and capabilities change due to business and technology changes.
    • The DRP is disconnected from day-to-day operations.
    Sample Outputs
    Reviewed and updated change, project, and performance management processes.
    Reviewed and updated internal SLAs.
    Reviewed and updated data protection and backup procedures.

    Review infrastructure service provider DR capabilities

    Insert DR planning in key operational processes to support plan maintenance:

    • Reviewing vendor DR capabilities is a core IT vendor management competency.
    • As your DR requirements change year-to-year, ensure your vendors’ service commitments still meet your DR requirements.
    • Identify changes in the vendor’s service offerings and DR capabilities, e.g. higher costs for additional DR support, new offerings to reduce potential downtime, or conversely, a degradation in DR capabilities.

    Risks and Challenges Mitigated

    • Vendor capabilities haven’t been measured against business requirements.
    • No internal capability exists currently to assess vendor ability to meet promised SLAs.
    • No internal capability exists to track vendor performance on recoverability.
    Sample Outputs
    A customized vendor DRP questionnaire.
    Reviewed vendor SLAs.
    Choose to keep or change service levels or vendor offerings based on findings.

    Phase 4: Insights and accomplishments

    Screenshot of DRP Maturity Assessment Results

    Identified progress against targets

    Screenshot of prioritized further initiatives.

    Prioritized further initiatives

    Screenshot of DRP Planning Roadmap

    Added initiatives to the roadmap

    Summary of Accomplishments

    • Developed a list of high-priority initiatives that can support the extension and maintenance of the DR plan over the long term.
    • Reviewed and update maturity assessments to establish progress and communicate the value of the DR program.

    Summary of accomplishment

    Knowledge Gained

    • Conduct a BIA to determine appropriate targets for RTOs and RPOs.
    • Identify DR projects required to close RTO/RPO gaps and mitigate risks.
    • Use tabletop planning to create and validate an incident response plan.

    Processes Optimized

    • Your DRP process was optimized, from BIA to documenting an incident response plan.
    • Your vendor evaluation process was optimized to identify and assess a vendor’s ability to meet your DR requirements, and to repeat this evaluation on an annual basis.

    Deliverables Completed

    • DRP Maturity Scorecard
    • DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool
    • DRP Roadmap Tool
    • Incident response plan and systems recovery workflow
    • Executive presentation

    Info-Tech’s insights bust the most obstinate myths of DRP

    Myth #1: DRPs need to focus on major events such as natural disasters and other highly destructive incidents such as fire and flood.

    Reality: The most common threats to service continuity are hardware and software failures, network outages, and power outages.

    Myth #2: Effective DRPs start with identifying and evaluating potential risks.

    Reality: DR isn’t about identifying risks; it’s about ensuring service continuity.

    Myth #3: DRPs are separate from day-to-day operations and incident management.

    Reality: DR must be integrated with service management to ensure service continuity.

    Myth #4: I use a co-lo or cloud services so I don’t have to worry about DR. That’s my vendor’s responsibility.

    Reality: You can’t outsource accountability. You can’t just assume your vendor’s DR capabilities will meet your needs.

    Myth #5: A DRP must include every detail so anyone can execute the recovery.

    Reality: IT DR is not an airplane disaster movie. You aren’t going to ask a business user to execute a system recovery, just like you wouldn’t really want a passenger with no flying experience to land a plane.

    Supplement the core documentation with these tools and templates

    • An Excel workbook workbook to track key roles on DR, business continuity, and emergency response teams. Can also track DR documentation location and any hardware purchases required for DR.
    • A questionnaire template and a response tracking tool to structure your investigation of vendor DR capabilities.
    • Integrate escalation with your DR plan by defining incident severity and escalation rules . Use this example as a template or integrate ideas into your own severity definitions and escalation rules in your incident management procedures.
    • A minute-by-minute time-tracking tool to capture progress in a DR or testing scenario. Monitor progress against objectives in real time as recovery tasks are started and completed.

    Next steps: Related Info-Tech research

    Select the Optimal Disaster Recovery Deployment Model Evaluate cloud, co-lo, and on-premises disaster recovery deployment models.

    Develop a Business Continuity Plan Streamline the traditional approach to make BCP development manageable and repeatable.

    Prepare for a DRP Audit Assess your current DRP maturity, identify required improvements, and complete an audit-ready DRP summary document.

    Document and Maintain Your Disaster Recovery Plan Put your DRP on a diet: keep it fit, trim, and ready for action.

    Reduce Costly Downtime Through DR Testing Improve your DR plan and your team’s ability to execute on it.

    Implement Crisis Management Best Practices An effective crisis response minimizes the impact of a crisis on reputation, profitability, and continuity.

    Research contributors and experts

    • Alan Byrum, Director of Business Continuity, Intellitech
    • Bernard Jones (MBCI, CBCP, CORP, ITILv3), Owner/Principal, B Jones BCP Consulting, LLC
    • Paul Beaudry, Assistant Vice-President, Technical Services, MIS, Richardson International Limited
    • Yogi Schulz, President, Corvelle Consulting

    Glossary

    • Business Continuity Management (BCM) Program: Ongoing management and governance process supported by top management and appropriately resourced to implement and maintain business continuity management. (Source: ISO 22301:2012)
    • Business Continuity Plan (BCP): Documented procedures that guide organizations to respond, recover, resume, and restore to a pre-defined level of operation following disruption. The BCP is not necessarily one document, but a collection of procedures and information.
    • Crisis: A situation with a high level of uncertainty that disrupts the core activities and/or credibility of an organization and requires urgent action. (Source: ISO 22300)
    • Crisis Management Team (CMT): A group of individuals responsible for developing and implementing a comprehensive plan for responding to a disruptive incident. The team consists of a core group of decision makers trained in incident management and prepared to respond to any situation.
    • Disaster Recovery Planning (DRP): The activities associated with the continuing availability and restoration of the IT infrastructure.
    • Incident: An event that has the capacity to lead to loss of, or a disruption to, an organization’s operations, services, or functions – which, if not managed, can escalate into an emergency, crisis, or disaster.
    • BCI Editor’s Note: In most countries “incident” and “crisis” are used interchangeably, but in the UK the term “crisis” has been generally reserved for dealing with wide-area incidents involving Emergency Services. The BCI prefers the use of “incident” for normal BCM purposes. (Source: The Business Continuity Institute)

    • Incident Management Plan: A clearly defined and documented plan of action for use at the time of an incident, typically covering the key personnel, resources, services, and actions needed to implement the incident management process.
    • IT Disaster: A service interruption requiring IT to rebuild a service, restore from backups, or activate redundancy at the backup site.
    • Recovery Point: Time elapsed between the last good copy of the data being taken and failure/corruption on the production environment; think of this as data loss.
    • Recovery Point Actual (RPA): The currently achievable recovery point after a disaster event, given existing people, processes, and technology. This reflects expected maximum data loss that could actually occur in a disaster scenario.
    • Recovery Point Objective (RPO): The target recovery point after a disaster event, usually calculated in hours, on a given system, application, or service. Think of this as acceptable and appropriate data loss. RPO should be based on a business impact analysis (BIA) to identify an acceptable and appropriate recovery target.
    • Recovery Time: Time required to restore a system, application, or service to a functional state; think of this as downtime.
    • Recovery Time Actual (RTA): The currently achievable recovery time after a disaster event, given existing people, processes, and technology. This reflects expected maximum downtime that could actually occur in a disaster scenario.
    • Recovery Time Objective (RTO): The target recovery time after a disaster event for a given system, application, or service. RTO should be based on a business impact analysis (BIA) to identify acceptable and appropriate downtime.

    Bibliography

    BCMpedia. “Recovery Objectives: RTO, RPO, and MTPD.” BCMpedia, n.d. Web.

    Burke, Stephen. “Public Cloud Pitfalls: Microsoft Azure Storage Cluster Loses Power, Puts Spotlight On Private, Hybrid Cloud Advantages.” CRN, 16 Mar. 2017. Web.

    Elliot, Stephen. “DevOps and the Cost of Downtime: Fortune 1000 Best Practice Metrics Quantified.” IDC, 2015. Web.

    FEMA. Planning & Templates. FEMA, 2015. Web.

    FINRA. “Business Continuity Plans and Emergency Contact Information.” FINRA, 2015. Web.

    FINRA. “FINRA, the SEC and CFTC Issue Joint Advisory on Business Continuity Planning.” FINRA, 2013. Web.

    Gosling, Mel, and Andrew Hiles. “Business Continuity Statistics: Where Myth Meets Fact.” Continuity Central, 2009. Web.

    Hanwacker, Linda. “COOP Templates for Success Workbook.” The LSH Group, n.d. Web.

    Homeland Security. Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA). Homeland Security, 2015. Web.

    Nichols, Shaun. “AWS's S3 Outage Was So Bad Amazon Couldn't Get Into Its Own Dashboard to Warn the World.” The Register, 1 Mar. 2017. Web.

    Potter, Patrick. “BCM Regulatory Alphabet Soup.” RSA Archer Organization, 2012. Web.

    Rothstein, Philip Jan. “Disaster Recovery Testing: Exercising Your Contingency Plan.” Rothstein Associates Inc., 2007. Web.

    The Business Continuity Institute. “The Good Practice Guidelines.” The Business Continuity Institute, 2013. Web.

    The Disaster Recovery Journal. “Disaster Resource Guide.” The Disaster Recovery Journal, 2015. Web.

    The Disaster Recovery Journal. “DR Rules & Regulations.” The Disaster Recovery Journal, 2015. Web.

    The Federal Financial Institution Examination Council (FFIEC). Business Continuity Planning. IT Examination Handbook InfoBase, 2015. Web.

    York, Kyle. “Read Dyn’s Statement on the 10/21/2016 DNS DDoS Attack.” Oracle, 22 Oct. 2016. Web.

    Security Strategy

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}42|cart{/j2store}
    • Related Products: {j2store}42|crosssells{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.4/10
    • member rating average dollars saved: $33,431
    • member rating average days saved: 29
    • Parent Category Name: Security and Risk
    • Parent Category Link: /security-and-risk

    The challenge

    You may be experiencing one or more of the following:

    • You may not have sufficient security resources to handle all the challenges.
    • Security threats are prevalent. Yet many businesses struggle to embed systemic security thinking into their culture.
    • The need to move towards strategic planning of your security landscape is evident. How to get there is another matter.

    Our advice

    Insight

    To have a successful information security strategy, take these three factors into account:

    • Holistic: your view must include people, processes, and technology.
    • Risk awareness: Base your strategy on the actual risk profile of your company. And then add the appropriate best practices.
    • Business-aligned: When your strategic security plan demonstrates alignment with the business goals and supports it, embedding will go much more straightforward.

    Impact and results 

    • We have developed a highly effective approach to creating your security strategy. We tested and refined this for more than seven years with hundreds of different organizations.
    • We ensure alignment with business objectives.
    • We assess organizational risk and stakeholder expectations.
    • We enable a comprehensive current state assessment.
    • And we prioritize initiatives and build out a right-sized security roadmap.

     

    The roadmap

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    Get up to speed

    Read up on why you should build your customized information security strategy. Review our methodology and understand the four ways we can support you.

    Assess the security requirements

    It all starts with risk appetite, yes, but security is something you want to get right. Determine your organizations' security pressures and business goals, and then determine your security program's goals.

    • Build an Information Security Strategy – Phase 1: Assess Requirements
    • Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool (xls)
    • Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool (xls)

    Build your gap initiative

    Our best-of-breed security framework makes you perform a gap analysis between where you are and where you want to be (your target state). Once you know that, you can define your goals and duties.

    • Build an Information Security Strategy – Phase 2: Assess Gaps
    • Information Security Program Gap Analysis Tool (xls)

    Plan the implementation of your security strategy 

    With your design at this level, it is time to plan your roadmap.

    • Build an Information Security Strategy – Phase 3: Build the Roadmap

    Let it run and continuously improve. 

    Learn to use our methodology to manage security initiatives as you go. Identify the resources you need to execute the evolving strategy successfully.

    • Build an Information Security Strategy – Phase 4: Execute and Maintain
    • Information Security Strategy Communication Deck (ppt)
    • Information Security Charter (doc)

     

    Tell Your Story With Data Visualization

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}364|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Business Intelligence Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /business-intelligence-strategy

    Analysts do not feel empowered to challenge requirements to deliver a better outcome. This alongside underlying data quality issues prevents the creation of accurate and helpful information. Graphic representations do not provide meaningful and actionable insights.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    As organizations strive to become more data-driven, good storytelling with data visualization supports growing corporate data literacy and helps analysts in providing insights that improves organization's decision-making and value-driving processes, which ultimately boosts business performance.

    Impact and Result

    Follow a step-by-step guide to address the business bias of tacet experience over data facts and increase audience's understanding and acceptance toward data solutions.

    Save the lost hours and remove the challenges of reports and dashboards being disregarded due to ineffective usage.

    Gain insights from data-driven recommendations and have decision support to make informed decisions.

    Tell Your Story With Data Visualization Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Tell Your Story With Data Visualization Deck – Solve challenging business problems more effectively and improve communication with audiences by demonstrating significant insights through data storytelling with impactful visuals.

    Here is our step-by-step process of getting value out of effective storytelling with data visualization:

  • Step 1: Frame the business problem and the outcomes required.
  • Step 2: Explore the potential drivers and formulate hypotheses to test.
  • Step 3: Construct a meaningful narrative which the data supports.
    • Tell Your Story With Data Visualization Storyboard

    2. Storytelling Whiteboard Canvas Template – Plan out storytelling using Info-Tech’s whiteboard canvas template.

    This storytelling whiteboard canvas is a template that will help you create your visualization story narrative by:

  • Identifying the problem space.
  • Finding logical relationships and data identification.
  • Reviewing analysis and initial insights.
  • Building the story and logical conclusion.
    • Storytelling Whiteboard Canvas Template
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Tell Your Story With Data Visualization

    Build trust with your stakeholders.

    Analyst Perspective

    Build trust with your stakeholders.

    Data visualization refers to graphical representations of data which help an audience understand. Without good storytelling, however, these representations can distract an audience with enormous amounts of data or even lead them to incorrect conclusions.

    Good storytelling with data visualization involves identifying the business problem, exploring potential drivers, formulating a hypothesis, and creating meaningful narratives and powerful visuals that resonate with all audiences and ultimately lead to clear actionable insights.

    Follow Info-Tech's step-by-step approach to address the business bias of tacit experience over data facts, improve analysts' effectiveness and support better decision making.

    Ibrahim Abdel-Kader, Research Analyst

    Ibrahim Abdel-Kader
    Research Analyst,
    Data, Analytics, and Enterprise Architecture

    Nikitha Patel, Research Specialist

    Nikitha Patel
    Research Specialist,
    Data, Analytics, and Enterprise Architecture

    Ruyi Sun, Research Specialist

    Ruyi Sun
    Research Specialist,
    Data, Analytics, and Enterprise Architecture

    Our understanding of the problem

    This research is designed for

    • Business analysts, data analysts, or their equivalent who (in either a centralized or federated operating model) look to solve challenging business problems more effectively and improve communication with audiences by demonstrating significant insights through visual data storytelling.

    This research will also assist

    • A CIO or business unit (BU) leader looking to improve reporting and analytics, reduce time to information, and embrace decision making.

    This research will help you

    • Identify the business problem and root causes that you are looking to address for key stakeholders.
    • Improve business decision making through effective data storytelling.
    • Focus on insight generation rather than report production.
    • Apply design thinking principles to support the collection of different perspectives.

    This research will help them

    • Understand the report quickly and efficiently, regardless of their data literacy level.
    • Grasp the current situation of data within the organization.

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge Common Obstacles Info-Tech's Approach
    As analysts, you may experience some critical challenges when presenting a data story.
    • The graphical representation does not provide meaningful or actionable insights.
    • Difficulty selecting the right visual tools or technologies to create visual impact.
    • Lack of empowerment, where analysts don't feel like they can challenge requirements.
    • Data quality issues that prevent the creation of accurate and helpful information.
    Some common roadblocks may prevent you from addressing these challenges.
    • Lack of skills and context to identify the root cause or the insight that adds the most value.
    • Lack of proper design or over-visualization of data will mislead/confuse the audience.
    • Business audience bias, leading them to ignore reliable insights presented.
    • Lack of the right access to obtain data could hinder the process.
    • Understand and dissect the business problem through Info-Tech's guidance on root cause analysis and design thinking process.
    • Explore each potential hypothesis and construct your story's narratives.
    • Manage data visualization using evolving tools and create visual impact.
    • Inform business owners how to proceed and collect feedback to achieve continuous improvement.

    Info-Tech Insight
    As organizations strive to become more data-driven, good storytelling with data visualization supports growing corporate data literacy and helps analysts provide insights that improve organizational decision-making and value-driving processes, which ultimately boosts business performance.

    Glossary

    • Data: Facts or figures, especially those stored in a computer, that can be used for calculating, reasoning, or planning. When data is processed, organized, structured, or presented in a given context to make it useful, it is called information. Data leaders are accountable for certain data domains and sets.
    • Data storytelling: The ability to create a narrative powered by data and analytics that supports the hypothesis and intent of the story. Narrators of the story should deliver a significant view of the message in a way easily understood by the target audience. Data visualization can be used as a tactic to enhance storytelling.
    • Data visualization: The ability to visually represent a complete story to the target audience powered by data & analytics, using data storytelling as an enabling mechanism to convey narratives. Typically, there are two types of visuals used as part of data visualization: explanatory/informative visuals (the entire story or specific aspects delivered to the audience) and exploratory visuals (the collected data used to clarify what questions must be answered).
    • Data literacy: The ability to read, work with, analyze, and argue with data. Easy access to data is essential to exercising these skills. All organizational employees involved with data-driven decisions should learn to think critically about the data they use for analytics and how they assess and interpret the results of their work.
    • Data quality: A measure of the condition of data based on factors such as accuracy, completeness, consistency, reliability, and being up-to-date. This is about how well-suited a data set is to serve its intended purpose, therefore business users and stakeholders set the standards for what is good enough. The governance function along with IT ensures that data quality measures are applied, and corrective actions taken.
    • Analytics/Business intelligence (BI): A technology-driven process for analyzing data and delivering actionable information that helps executives, managers, and workers make informed business decisions. As part of the BI process, organizations collect data from internal IT systems and external sources, prepare it for analysis, run queries against the data, and create data visualizations.
      Note: In some frameworks, analytics and BI refer to different types of analyses (i.e. analytics predict future outcomes, BI describes what is or has been).

    Getting value out of effective storytelling with data visualization

    Data storytelling is gaining wide recognition as a tool for supporting businesses in driving data insights and making better strategic decisions.

    92% of respondents agreed that data storytelling is an effective way of communicating or delivering data and analytics results.

    87% of respondents agreed that if insights were presented in a simpler/clearer manner, their organization's leadership team would make more data-driven decisions.

    93% of respondents agreed that decisions made based on successful data storytelling could potentially help increase revenue.

    Source: Exasol, 2021

    Despite organizations recognizing the value of data storytelling, issues remain which cannot be remedied solely with better technology.

    61% Top challenges of conveying important insights through dashboards are lack of context (61%), over-communication (54%), and inability to customize contents for intended audiences (46%).

    49% of respondents feel their organizations lack storytelling skills, regardless of whether employees are data literate.

    Source: Exasol, 2021

    Info-Tech Insight
    Storytelling is a key component of data literacy. Although enterprises are increasingly investing in data analytics software, only 21% of employees are confident with their data literacy skills. (Accenture, 2020)

    Prerequisite Checklist

    Before applying Info-Tech's storytelling methodology, you should have addressed the following criteria:

    • Select the right data visualization tools.
    • Have the necessary training in statistical analysis and data visualization technology.
    • Have competent levels of data literacy.
    • Good quality data founded on data governance and data architecture best practices.

    To get a complete view of the field you want to explore, please refer to the following Info-Tech resources:

    Select and Implement a Reporting and Analytics Solution

    Build a Data Architecture Roadmap

    Establish Data Governance

    Build Your Data Quality Program

    Foster Data-Driven Culture With Data Literacy

    Info-Tech's Storytelling With Data Visualization Framework

    Data Visualization Framework

    Info-Tech Insight
    As organizations strive to become more data-driven, good storytelling with data visualization supports growing corporate data literacy and helps analysts provide insights that improve organizational decision-making and value-driving processes, which ultimately boosts business performance.

    Research Benefits

    Member Benefits Business Benefits
    • Reduce time spent on getting your audience in the room and promote business involvement with the project.
    • Eliminate ineffectively used reports and dashboards being disregarded for lack of storytelling skills, resulting in real-time savings and monetary impact.
    • Example: A $50k reporting project has a 49% risk of the company being unable to communicate effective data stories (Exasol, 2021). Therefore, a $50k project has an approx. 50% chance of being wasted. Using Info-Tech's methodology, members can remove the risk, saving $25k and the time required to produce each report.
    • Address the common business bias of tacit experience over data-supported facts and increase audience understanding and acceptance of data-driven solutions.
    • Clear articulation of business context and problem.
    • High-level improvement objectives and return on investment (ROI).
    • Gain insights from data-driven recommendations to assist with making informed decisions.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit Guided Implementation Workshop Consulting
    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks are used throughout all four options.

    Scale Business Process Automation

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}241|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Optimization
    • Parent Category Link: /optimization
    • Business process automation (BPA) adoption gained significant momentum as your business leaders saw the positive outcomes in your pilots, such as improvements in customer experience, operational efficiencies, and cost optimizations.
    • Your stakeholders are ready to increase their investments in more process automation solutions. They want to scale initial successes to other business and IT functions.
    • However, it is unclear how BPA can be successfully scaled and what benefits can be achieved from it.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    The shift from isolated, task-based automations in your pilot to value-oriented, scaled automations brings new challenges and barriers to your organization such as:

    • Little motivation or tolerance to change existing business operations to see the full value of BPA.
    • Overinvesting in current BPA technologies to maximize the return despite available alternatives that can do the same tasks better.
    • BPA teams are ill-equipped to meet the demands and complexities of scaled BPA implementations.

    Impact and Result

    • Ground your scaling expectations. Set realistic and achievable goals centered on driving business value to the entire organization by optimizing and automating end-to-end business processes.
    • Define your scaling journey. Tailor your scaling approach according to your ability to ease BPA implementation, to broaden BPA adoption, and to loosen BPA constraints.
    • Prepare to scale BPA. Cement your BPA management and governance foundations to support BPA scaling using the lessons learned from your pilot implementation.

    Scale Business Process Automation Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Scale Business Process Automation Deck – A guide to learn the opportunities and values of scaling business process automation.

    This research walks you through the level setting of your scaled business process automation (BPA) expectations, factors to consider in defining your scaled BPA journey, and assessing your readiness to scale BPA.

    • Scale Business Process Automation Storyboard

    2. Scale Business Process Automation Readiness Assessment – A tool to help you evaluate your readiness to scale business process automation.

    Use this tool to identify key gaps in the people, processes, and technologies you need to support the scaling of business process automation (BPA). It also contains a canvas to facilitate your discussions around business process automation with your stakeholders and BPA teams.

    • Scale Business Process Automation Readiness Assessment
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Scale Business Process Automation

    Take a value-first approach to automate the processes that matter

    Analyst Perspective

    Scaling business process automation (BPA) is an organization-wide commitment

    Business and IT must work together to ensure the right automations are implemented and BPA is grown and matured in a sustainable way. However, many organizations are not ready to make this commitment. Managing the automation demand backlog, coordinating cross-functional effort and organizational change, and measuring BPA value are some of the leading factors challenging scaling BPA.

    Pilot BPA with the intent to scale it. Pilots are safe starting points to establish your foundational governance and management practices and build the necessary relationships and collaborations for you to be successful. These factors will then allow you to explore more sophisticated, complicated, and innovative opportunities to drive new value to your team, department, and organization.

    A picture of Andrew Kum-Seun

    Andrew Kum-Seun
    Research Director,
    Application Delivery and Management
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    • Business process automation (BPA) adoption gained significant momentum as your business leaders see the positive outcomes in your pilots, such as improvements in customer experience, operational efficiencies, and cost optimizations.
    • Your stakeholders are ready to increase their investments in more process automation solutions. They want to scale initial successes to other business and IT functions.
    • However, it is unclear how BPA can be successfully scaled and what benefits can be achieved from it.

    Common Obstacles

    The shift from isolated, task-based automations in your pilot to value-oriented and scaled automations brings new challenges and barriers to your organization:

    • Little motivation or tolerance to change existing business operations to see the full value of BPA.
    • Overinvesting in current BPA technologies to maximize return despite available alternatives that can do the same tasks better.
    • BPA teams are ill-equipped to meet the demands and complexities of scaled BPA implementations.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    • Ground your scaling expectations. Set realistic and achievable goals centered on driving business value to the entire organization by optimizing and automating end-to-end business processes.
    • Define your scaling journey. Tailor your scaling approach according to your ability to ease BPA implementation, to broaden BPA adoption, and to loosen BPA constraints.
    • Prepare to scale BPA. Cement your BPA management and governance foundations to support BPA scaling using the lessons learned from your pilot implementation.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Take a value-first approach in your scaling business process automation (BPA) journey. Low-risk, task-oriented automations are good starting points to introduce BPA but constrain the broader returns your organization wants. Business value can only scale when everything and everyone in your processes are working together to streamline the entire value stream rather than the small gains from optimizing small, isolated automations.

    Scale Business Process Automation

    Take a value-first approach to automate the processes that matter

    Pilot Your BPA Capabilities

    • Learn the foundation practices to design, deliver, and support BPA.
    • Understand the fit and value of BPA.
    • Gauge the tolerance for business operational change and system risk.

    See Info-Tech's Build a Winning Business Process Automation Playbook blueprint for more information.

    Build Your Scaling BPA Vision

    Apply Lessons Learned to Scale

    1. Ground Your Scaling Expectations
      Set realistic and achievable goals centered on driving business value to the entire organization by optimizing and automating end-to-end business processes.
    2. Define Your Scaling Journey
      Tailor your scaling approach according to your ability to ease BPA implementation, to broaden BPA adoption, and to loosen BPA constraints.
    3. Prepare to Scale BPA
      Cement your BPA management and governance foundations to support BPA scaling using the lessons learned from your pilot implementation.

    Research deliverable

    Design and communicate your approach to scale business process automation with Info-Tech's Scale Business Process Automation Readiness Assessment:

    • Level set your scaled BPA goals and objectives.
    • Discuss and design your scaled BPA journey.
    • Identify the gaps and improvements needed to scale your BPA practices and implementation.

    A screenshot from Info-Tech's Scale Business Process Automation Readiness Assessment

    Step 1.1

    Ground Your Scaling Expectations

    Activities

    1.1.1 Define Your Scaling Objectives

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Process Owners
    • Product Owners
    • Application Directors
    • Business Architects
    • BPA Delivery & Support Teams

    Outcomes of this step

    Scaling BPA objectives

    Organizations want to scale their initial BPA success

    Notable Initial Benefits

    1. Time Saved: "In the first day of live operations, the robots were saving 51 hours each day or the equivalent of six people working an eight-hour shift." – Brendan MacDonald, Director of Customer Compliance Operations, Ladbrokes (UiPath)
    2. Documentation & Knowledge Sharing: "If certain people left, knowledge of some processes would be lost and we realized that we needed a reliable process management system in place." – Peta Kinnane, Acting Audit and Risk Coordinator, Liverpool City Council (Nintex)
    3. Improved Service Delivery: "Thanks to this automation, our percentage of triaged and assigned tickets is now 100%. Nothing falls through the cracks. It has also improved the time to assignment. We assign tickets 2x faster than before." – Sebastian Goodwin, Head of Cybersecurity, Nutanix (Workato)

    Can We Gain More From Automation?

    The Solution

    As industries evolve and adopt more tools and technology, their products, services, and business operating models become more complex. Task- and desktop-based automations are often not enough. More sophisticated and scaled automations are needed to simplify and streamline the process from end-to-end of complex operations and align them with organizational goals.

    Stakeholders see automation as an opportunity to scale the business

    The value of scaling BPA is dependent on the organization's ability to scale with it. In other words, stakeholders should see an increase in business value without a substantial increase in resources and operational costs (e.g., there should be little difference if sending out 10 emails versus 1000).

    Examples of how business can be scaled with automation

    • Processes triggered by incoming documents or email: in these processes, an incoming document or email (that has semi-structured or unstructured data) is collected by a script or an RPA bot. This document is then processed with a machine learning model that validates it either by rules or ML models. The validated and enriched machine-readable data is then passed on to the next system of record.
    • The accounts payable process: this process includes receiving, processing, and paying out invoices from suppliers that provided goods or services to the company. While manual processing can be expensive, take too much time, and lead to errors, businesses can automate this process with machine learning and document extraction technologies like optical characters recognition (OCR), which converts texts containing images into characters that can be readable by computers to edit, compute, and analyze.
    • Order management: these processes include retrieving email and relevant attachments, extracting information that tells the business what its customers want, updating internal systems with newly placed orders or modifications, or taking necessary actions related to customer queries.
    • Enhance customer experience: [BPA tools] can help teams develop and distribute customer loyalty offers faster while also optimizing these offers with customer insights. Now, enterprises can more easily guarantee they are delivering the relevant solutions their clients are demanding.

    Source: Stefanini Group

    Scaling BPA has its challenges

    Perceived Lack of Opportunities

    Pilot BPA implementations often involve the processes that are straightforward to automate or are already shortlisted to optimize. However, these low-hanging fruits will run out. Discovering new BPA opportunities can be challenged for a variety of reasons, such as:

    • Lack of documentation and knowledge
    • Low user participation or drive to change
    • BPA technology limitations and constraints

    Perceived Lack of Opportunities

    BPA is not a cheap investment. A single RPA bot, for example, can cost between $5,000 to $15,000. This cost does not include the added cost for training, renewal fees, infrastructure set up and other variable and reoccurring costs that often come with RPA delivery and support (Blueprint). This reality can motivate BPA owners to favor existing technologies over other cheaper and more effective alternatives in an attempt boost their return on investment.

    Ill-Equipped Support Teams

    Good technical skills and tools, and the right mindset are critical to ensure BPA capabilities are deployed effectively. Low-code no-code (LCNC) can help but success isn't guaranteed. Lack of experience with low-code platforms is the biggest obstacle in low-code adoption according to 60% of respondents (Creatio). The learning curve has led some organizations to hire contractors to onboard BPA teams, hire new employees, or dedicate significant funding and resources to upskill internal resources.

    Shift your objectives from task-based efficiencies to value-driven capabilities

    How can I improve myself?

    How can we improve my team?

    How can we improve my organization?

    Objectives

    • Improve worker productivity
    • Improve the repeatability and predictability of the process
    • Deliver outputs of consistent quality and cadence
    • Increase process, tool, and technology confidence
    • Increase the team's throughput, commitment, and load
    • Apply more focus on cognitive and complex tasks
    • Reduce the time to complete error-prone, manual, and routine collaborations
    • Deliver insightful, personalized, and valuable outputs
    • Drive more value in existing pipelines and introduce new value streams
    • Deliver consistent digital experiences involving different technologies
    • Automatically tailor a customer's experience to individual preferences
    • Forecast and rapidly respond to customer issues and market trends

    Goals

    • Learn the fit of BPA & set the foundations
    • Improve the practices & tools and optimize the performance
    • Scale BPA capabilities throughout the organization

    Gauge the success of your scaled BPA

    BPA Practice Effectiveness

    Key Question: Are stakeholders satisfied with how the BPA practice is meeting their automation needs?

    Examples of Metrics:

    • User satisfaction
    • Automation request turnaround time
    • Throughput of BPA team

    Automation Solution Quality

    Key Question: How do your automation solutions perform and meet your quality standards?

    Examples of Metrics:

    • Licensing and operational costs
    • Service level agreement and uptime/downtime
    • Number of defects

    Business Value Delivery

    Key Question: How has automation improved the value your employees, teams, and the organization delivers?

    Examples of Metrics:
    Increase in revenue generation
    Reduction in operational costs
    Expansion of business capabilities with minimal increases in costs and risks

    1.1.1 Define your scaling objectives

    5 minutes

    1. Complete the following fields to build your scaled business process automation canvas:
      1. Problem that scaling BPA is intending to solve
      2. Your vision for scaling BPA
      3. Stakeholders
      4. Scaled BPA business and IT objectives and metrics
      5. Business capabilities, processes, and application systems involved
      6. Notable constraints, roadblocks, and challenges to your scaled BPA success
    2. Document your findings and discussions in Info-Tech's Scale Business Process Automation Readiness Assessment.

    Output

    Scaled BPA value canvas

    Participants

    • Business Process Owners
    • Product Owners
    • Application Directors
    • Business Architects
    • BPA Delivery & Support Teams

    Record the results in the 2. Value Canvas Tab in the Scale Business Process Automation Readiness Assessment.

    1.1.1 cont'd

    Scaled BPA Value Canvas Template:

    A screenshot of Scaled BPA Value Canvas Template

    Align your objectives to your application portfolio strategy

    Why is an application portfolio strategy important for BPA?

    • All business process optimizations are designed, delivered, and managed to support a consistent interpretation of the business and IT vision and goals.
    • Clear understanding of the sprawl, criticality, and risks of automation solutions and applications to business capabilities.
    • BPA initiatives are planned, prioritized, and coordinated alongside modernization, upgrades, and other changes to the application portfolio.
    • Resources, skills, and capacities are strategically allocated to meet BPA demand considering other commitments in the backlog and roadmap.
    • BPA expectations and practices uphold the persona, values, and principles of the application team.

    What is an application portfolio strategy?

    An application portfolio strategy details the direction, activities, and tactics to deliver on the promise of your application portfolio. It often includes:

    • Portfolio vision and goals
    • Application, automation, and process portfolio
    • Values and principles
    • Portfolio health
    • Risks and constraints
    • Strategic roadmap

    See our Application Portfolio Management Foundations blueprint for more information.

    Leverage your BPA champions to drive change and support scaling initiatives

    An arrow showing the steps to Leverage your BPA champions to drive change and support scaling initiatives

    Expected Outcome From Your Pilot: Your pilot would have recognized the roles that know how to effectively apply good BPA practices (e.g., process analysis and optimization) and are familiar with the BPA toolset. These individuals are prime candidates who can standardize your Build a Winning Business Process Automation Playbook, upskill interested teams, and build relationships among those involved in the delivery and use of BPA.

    Step 1.2

    Define Your Scaling Journey

    Activities

    1.2.1 Discuss Your BPA Opportunities
    1.2.2 Lay Out Your Scaling BPA Journey

    Scale Business Process Automation

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Process Owners
    • Product Owners
    • Application Directors
    • Business Architects
    • BPA Delivery & Support Teams

    Outcomes of this step

    • List of scaling BPA opportunities
    • Tailored scaling journey

    Maintain a healthy demand pipeline

    A successful scaled BPA practice requires a continuous demand for BPA capabilities and the delivery of minimum viable automations (MVA) held together by a broader strategic roadmap.

    An image of a healthy demand pipeline.  it flows from opportunities to trends, with inputs from internal and external sources.

    An MVA focuses on a single and small process use case, involves minimal possible effort to improve, and is designed to satisfy a specific user group. Its purpose is to maximize learning and value and inform the further scaling of the BPA technology, approach, or practice.

    See our Build a Winning Business Process Automation Playbook blueprint for more information.

    Investigate how BPA trends can drive more value for the organization

    • Event-Driven Automation
      Process is triggered by a schedule, system output, scenario, or user (e.g., voice-activated, time-sensitive, system condition)
    • Low- & No-Code Automation build and management are completed through an easy-to-learn scripting language and/or a GUI.
    • Intelligent Document Processing
      Transform documents for better analysis, processing and handling (e.g., optical character recognition) by a tool or system.
    • End-to-End Process Automation & Transparency
      Linking cross-functional processes to enable automation of the entire value stream with seamless handoffs or triggers.
    • Orchestration of Different BPA Technologies
      Integrating and sequencing the execution of multiple automation solutions through a single console.
    • Cognitive Automation
      AI and other intelligent technologies automate information-intensive processes, including semi and unstructured data and human thinking simulation.
    • Intelligent Internet-of-Things
      Connecting process automation technologies to physical environments with sensors and other interaction devices (e.g., computer vision).
    • Ethical Design
      Optimizing processes that align to the moral value, principles, and beliefs of the organization (e.g., respects data privacy, resists manipulative patterns).
    • User Profiling & Tailored Experiences
      Customizing process outputs and user experience with user-defined configurations or system and user activity monitoring.
    • Process Mining & Discovery
      Gleaning optimization opportunities by analyzing system activities (mining) or monitoring user interactions with applications (discovery).

    1.2.1 Discuss your BPA opportunities

    5 minutes

    1. Review the goals and objectives of your initiative and the expectations you want to gain from scaling BPA.
    2. Discuss how BPA trends can be leveraged in your organization.
    3. List high priority scaling BPA opportunities.

    Output

    • Scaled BPA opportunities

    Participants

    • Business Process Owners
    • Product Owners
    • Application Directors
    • Business Architects
    • BPA Delivery & Support Teams

    Create your recipe for success

    Your scaling BPA recipe (approach) can involve multiple different flavors of various quantities to fit the needs and constraints of your organization and workers.

    What and how many ingredients you need is dependent on three key questions:

    1. How can we ease BPA implementation?
    2. How can we broaden the BPA scope?
    3. How can we loosen constraints?

    Personalize Scaling BPA To Your Taste

    • Extend BPA Across Business Units (Horizontal)
    • Integrate BPA Across Your Application Architecture (Vertical)
    • Embed AI/ML Into Your Automation Technologies
    • Empower Users With Business-Managed Automations
    • Combine Multiple Technologies for End-to-End Automation
    • Increase the Volume and Velocity of Automation
    • Automate Cognitive Processes and Making Variable Decisions

    Answer these questions in the definition of your scaling BPA journey

    Seeing the full value of your scaling approach is dependent on your ability to support BPA adoption across the organization

    How can we ease BPA implementation?

    • Good governance practices (e.g., role definitions, delivery and management processes, technology standards).
    • Support for innovation and experimentation.
    • Interoperable and plug-and-play architecture.
    • Dedicated technology management and support, including resources, documents, templates and shells.
    • Accessible and easy-to-understand knowledge and document repository.

    How can we broaden BPA scope?

    • Provide a unified experience across processes, fragmented technologies, and siloed business functions.
    • Improve intellectually intensive activities, challenging decision making and complex processes with more valuable insights and information using BPA.
    • Proactively react to business and technology environments and operational changes and interact with customers with unattended automation.
    • Infuse BPA technologies into your product and service to expand their functions, output quality, and reliability.

    How can we loosen constraints?

    • Processes are automated without the need for structured data and optimized processes, and there is no need to work around or avoid legacy applications.
    • Workers are empowered to develop and maintain their own automations.
    • Coaching, mentoring, training, and onboarding capabilities.
    • Accessibility and adoption of underutilized applications are improved with BPA.
    • BPA is used to overcome the limitations or the inefficiencies of other BPA technologies.

    1.2.2 Lay out your scaling BPA journey

    5 minutes

    1. Review the goals and objectives of your initiative, the expectations you want to gain from scaling BPA, and the various scaling BPA opportunities.
    2. Discuss the different scaling BPA flavors (patterns) and how each flavor is applicable to your situation. Ask yourself these key questions:
      1. How can we ease BPA implementation?
      2. How can we broaden the BPA scope?
      3. How can we loosen constraints?
    3. Design the broad steps of your scaling BPA journey. See the following slide for an example.
    4. Document your findings and discussions in Info-Tech's Scale Business Process Automation Readiness Assessment.

    Record the results in the 3. Scaled BPA Journey Tab in the Scale Business Process Automation Readiness Assessment.

    Output

    • Scaled BPA journey

    Participants

    • Business Process Owners
    • Product Owners
    • Application Directors
    • Business Architects
    • BPA Delivery & Support Teams

    1.2.2 cont'd

    An image of the marker used to identify Continuous business process optimization and automation Continuous business process optimization and automation
    An image of the marker used to identify Scope of Info-Tech's Build Your Business Process Automation Playbook blueprintScope of Info-Tech's Build Your Business Process Automation Playbook blueprint

    Example:

    An example of the BPA journey.  Below are the links included in the journey.

    Continuously review and realign expectations

    Optimizing your scaled BPA practices and applying continuous improvements starts with monitoring the process after implementation.

    Purpose of Monitoring

    1. Diligent monitoring confirms your scaled BPA implementation is performing as desired and meeting initial expectations.
    2. Holding reviews of your BPA practice and implementations helps assess the impact of marketplace and business operations changes and allows the organization to stay on top of trends and risks.

    Metrics

    Metrics are an important aspect of monitoring and sustaining the scaled practice. The metrics will help determine success and find areas where adjustments may be needed.

    Hold retrospectives to identify any practice issues to be resolved or opportunities to undertake

    The retrospective gives your organization the opportunity to review themselves and brainstorm solutions and a plan for improvements to be actioned. This session is reoccurring, typically, after key milestones. While it is important to allow all participants the opportunity to voice their opinions, feelings, and experiences, retrospectives must be positive, productive, and time boxed.

    Step 1.3

    Prepare to Scale BPA

    Activities

    1.3.1 Assess Your Readiness to Scale BPA

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Process Owners
    • Product Owners
    • Application Directors
    • Business Architects
    • BPA Delivery & Support Teams

    Outcomes of this step

    • Scale BPA readiness assessment

    Prepare to scale by learning from your pilot implementations

    "While most organizations are advised to start with automating the 'low hanging fruit' first, the truth is that it can create traps that will impede your ability to achieve RPA at scale. In fact, scaling RPA into the organizational structure is fundamentally different from implementing a conventional software product or other process automation."
    – Blueprint

    What should be the takeaways from your pilot?

    Degree of Required BPA Support

    • Practices needed to address the organization's tolerance to business process changes and automation adoption.
    • Resources, budget and skills needed to configure and orchestrate automation technologies to existing business applications and systems.

    Technology Integration & Compatibility

    • The BPA technology and application system's flexibility to be enhanced, modified, and removed.
    • Adherence to data and system quality standards (e.g., security, availability) across all tools and technologies.

    Good Practices Toolkit

    • A list of tactics, techniques, templates, and examples to assist teams assessing and optimizing business processes and applying BPA solutions in your organization's context.
    • Strategies to navigate common blockers, challenges, and risks.

    Controls & Measures

    • Defined guardrails aligned to your organization's policies and risk tolerance
    • Key metrics are gathered to gauge the value and performance of your processes and automations for enhancements and further scaling.

    Decide how to architect and govern your BPA solutions

    Centralized

    A single body and platform to coordinate, execute, and manage all automation solutions.

    An image of the Centralized approach to governing BPA solutions.

    Distributed

    Automation solutions are locally delivered and managed whether that is per business unit, type of technology, or vendor. Some collaboration and integration can occur among solutions but might be done without a holistic strategy or approach.

    An image of the Distributed approach to governing BPA solutions.

    Hybrid

    Automation solutions are locally delivered and managed and executed for isolated use cases. Broader and complex automations are centrally orchestrated and administered.

    An image of the Hybrid approach to governing BPA solutions.

    Be prepared to address the risks with scaling BPA

    "Companies tend to underestimate the complexity of their business processes – and bots will frequently malfunction without an RPA design team that knows how to anticipate and prepare for most process exceptions. Unresolved process exceptions rank among the biggest RPA challenges, prompting frustrated users to revert to manual work."
    – Eduardo Diquez, Auxis, 2020

    Scenarios

    • Handling Failures of Dependent Systems
    • Handling Data Corruption & Quality Issues
    • Alignment to Regulatory & Industry Standards
    • Addressing Changes & Regressions to Business Processes
    • "Run Away" & Hijacked Automations
    • Unauthorized Access to Sensitive Information

    Recognize the costs to support your scaled BPA environment

    Cost Factors

    Automation Operations
    How will chaining multiple BPA technologies together impact your operating budget? Is there a limit on the number of active automations you can have at a single time?

    User Licenses
    How many users require access to the designer, orchestrator, and other functions of the BPA solution? Do they also require access to dependent applications, services, and databases?

    System Enhancements
    Are application and system upgrades and modernizations needed to support BPA? Is your infrastructure, data, and security controls capable of handling BPA demand?

    Supporting Resources
    Are dedicated resources needed to support, govern, and manage BPA across business and IT functions? Are internal resources or third-party providers preferred?

    Training & Onboarding
    Are end users and supporting resources trained to deliver, support, and/or use BPA? How will training and onboarding be facilitated: internally or via third party providers?

    Create a cross-functional and supportive body to lead the scaling of BPA

    Your supportive body is a cross-functional group of individuals promoting collaboration and good BPA practices. It enables an organization to extract the full benefits from critical systems, guides the growth and evolution of strategic BPA implementations, and provides critical expertise to those that need it. A supportive body distinctly caters to optimizing and strengthening BPA governance, management, and operational practices for a single technology or business function or broadly across the entire organization encompassing all BPA capabilities.

    What a support body is not:

    • A Temporary Measure
    • Exclusive to Large Organizations
    • A Project Management Office
    • A Physical Office
    • A Quick Fix

    See our Maximize the Benefits from Enterprise Applications With a Center of Excellence blueprint for more information.

    What are my options?

    Center of Excellence (CoE)
    AND
    Community of Practice (CoP)

    CoEs and CoPs provide critical functions

    An image of the critical functions provided by CoE and CoP.

    Shift your principles as you scale BPA

    As BPA scales, users and teams must not only think of how a BPA solution operates at a personal and technical level or what goals it is trying to achieve, but why it is worth doing and how the outcomes of the automated process will impact the organization's reputation, morality, and public perception.

    An image of the journey from Siloed BPA to Scaled BPA.

    "I think you're going to see a lot of corporations thinking about the corporate responsibility of [organizational change from automation], because studies show that consumers want and will only do business with socially responsible companies."

    – Todd Lohr

    Source: Appian, 2018.

    Assess your readiness to scale BPA

    Vision & Objectives
    Clear direction and goals of the business process automation practice.

    Governance
    Defined BPA roles and responsibilities, processes, and technology controls.

    Skills & Competencies
    The capabilities users and support roles must have to be successful with BPA.

    Business Process Management & Optimization
    The tactics to document, analyze, optimize, and monitor business processes.

    Business Process Automation Delivery
    The tactics to review the fit of automation solutions and deliver and support according to end user needs and preferences.

    Business Process Automation Platform
    The capabilities to manage BPA platforms and ensure it supports the growing needs of the business.

    1.3.1 Assess your readiness to scale BPA

    5 minutes

    1. Review your scaling BPA journey and selected patterns.
    2. Conduct a readiness assessment using the 4. Readiness Assessment tab in Info-Tech's Scale Business Process Automation Readiness Assessment.
    3. Brainstorm solutions to improve the capability or address the gaps found in this assessment.

    Output

    • Scaled BPA readiness assessment

    Participants

    • Business Process Owners
    • Product Owners
    • Application Directors
    • Business Architects
    • BPA Delivery & Support Teams

    Record the results in the 4. Readiness Assessment tab in Info-Tech's Scale Business Process Automation Readiness Assessment.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    “Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

    Workshop

    “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

    Consulting

    “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Bibliography

    Alston, Roland. "With the Rise of Intelligent Automation, Ethics Matter Now More than Ever." Appian, 4 Sept. 2018. Web.
    "Challenges of Achieving RPA at Scale." Blueprint, N.d. Web.
    Dilmegani, Cem. "RPA Benefits: 20 Ways Bots Improve Businesses in 2023," AI Multiple, 9 Jan 2023. Web.
    Diquez, Eduardo. "Struggling To Scale RPA? Discover The Secret to Success." Auxis, 30 Sept. 2020. Web.
    "How much does Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Really Cost?" Blueprint, 14 Sept. 2021. Web.
    "Liverpool City Council improves document process with Nintex." Nintex, n.d. Web.
    "The State of Low-Code/No-Code." Creatio, 2021. Web.
    "Using automation to enhance security and increase IT NPS to 90+ at Nutanix." Workato, n.d. Web.
    "What Is Hyperautomation? A Complete Guide To One Of Gartner's Top Tech Trends." Stefanini Group, 26 Mar. 2021. Web.

    2022 Tech Trends

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}94|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Innovation
    • Parent Category Link: /innovation
    • The post-pandemic workplace continues to shift and requires collaboration between remote workers and office workers.
    • Digital transformation has accelerated across every organization and CIOs must maneuver to keep pace.
    • Customer expectations have shifted, and spending habits are moving away from in-person activities to online.
    • IT must improve its maturity in key capabilities to maintain relevance in the organization.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Improve the capabilities that matter. Focus on IT capabilities that are most relevant to competing in the digital economy and will enable the CEO's mission for growth.
    • Assess how external environment presents opportunities or threats to your organization using a scenarios approach, then chart a plan.

    Impact and Result

    • Use the data and analysis from Info-Tech's 2022 Tech Trends report to inform your digital strategic plan.
    • Discover the five trends shaping IT's path in 2022 and explore use cases for emerging technologies.
    • Hear directly from leading subject matter experts on each trend with featured episodes from our Tech Insights podcast.

    2022 Tech Trends Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. 2022 Tech Trends Report – A deck that discusses five use cases that can improve on your organization’s ability to compete in the digital economy.

    The post-pandemic pace of change continues to accelerate as the economic rapidly becomes more digital. To keep pace with shifting consumer expectations, CIOs must help the CEO compete in the digital economy by focusing on five key capabilities: innovation, human resources management, data architecture, security strategy, and business process controls and internal audit. Raising maturity in these capabilities will help CIOs deliver on opportunities to streamline back-office processes and develop new lines of revenue.

    • 2022 Tech Trends Report

    Infographic

    Further reading

    2022 Tech Trends

    Enabling the digital economy

    Supporting the CEO for growth

    The post-pandemic pace of change

    The disruptions to the way we work caused by the pandemic haven’t bounced back to normal.

    As part of its research process for the 2022 Tech Trends Report, Info-Tech Research Group conducted an open online survey among its membership and wider community of professionals. The survey was fielded from August 2021 through to September 2021, collecting 475 responses. We asked some of the same questions as last year’s survey so we can compare results as well as new questions to explore new trends.

    How much do you expect your organization to change permanently compared to how it was operating before the pandemic?

    • 7% – No change. We'll keep doing business as we always have.
    • 33% – A bit of change. Some ways of working will shift long term
    • 47% – A lot of change. The way we work will be differ in many ways long term. But our business remains...
    • 13% – Transformative change. Our fundamental business will be different and we'll be working in new ways.

    This year, about half of IT professionals expect a lot of change to the way we work and 13% expect a transformative change with a fundamental shift in their business. Last year, the same percentage expected a lot of change and only 10% expected transformative change.

    30% more professionals expect transformative permanent change compared to one year ago.

    47% of professionals expect a lot of permanent change; this remains the same as last year. (Info-Tech Tech Trends 2022 Survey)

    The pandemic accelerated the speed of digital transformation

    With the massive disruption preventing people from gathering, businesses shifted to digital interactions with customers.

    A visualization of the growth of 'Global average share of customer interactions that are digital' from December 2019 to July 2020. In that time it went from 36% to 58% with an 'Acceleration of 3 years'.

    Companies also accelerated the pace of creating digital or digitally enhanced products and services.

    A visualization of the growth of 'Global average share of partially or fully digitized products and/or services' from December 2019 to July 2020. In that time it went from 35% to 55% with an 'Acceleration of 7 years'. (McKinsey, 2020)

    “The Digital Economy incorporates all economic activity reliant on or significantly enhanced by the use of digital inputs, including digital technologies, digital infrastructure, digital services and data.” (OECD Definition)

    IT must enable participation in the digital economy

    Consumer spending is tilting more digital.

    Consumers have cut back spending on sectors where purchases are mostly made offline. That spending has shifted to digital services and online purchases. New habits formed during the pandemic are likely to stick for many consumers, with a continued shift to online consumption for many sectors.

    Purchases on online platforms are projected to rise from 10% today to 33% by 2030.

    Estimated online share of consumption
    Recreation & culture 30%
    Restaurants & hotels 50%
    Transport 10%
    Communications 90%
    Education 50%
    Health 20%
    Housing & utilities 50%
    (HSBC, 2020)

    Changing customer expectations pose a risk.

    IT practitioners agree that customer expectations are changing. They expect this to be more likely to disrupt their business in the next 12 months than new competition, cybersecurity incidents, or government-enacted policy changes.

    Factors likely to disrupt business in next 12 months
    Government-enacted policy changes 22%
    Cybersecurity incidents 56%
    Regulatory changes 45%
    Established competitor wins 26%
    New player enters the market 23%
    Changing customer expectations 68%
    (Info-Tech Tech Trends 2022 Survey)

    This poses a challenge to IT departments below the “expand” level of maturity

    CIOs must climb the maturity ladder to help CEOs drive growth.

    Most IT departments rated their maturity in the “optimize” or “support” level on Info-Tech’s maturity ladder.

    CIOs at the “optimize” level can play a role in digital transformation by improving back-office processes but should aim for a higher mandate.

    CIOs achieving at the “expand” level can help directly improve revenues by improving customer-facing products and services, and those at the “transform” level can help fundamentally change the business to create revenue in new ways. CIOs can climb the maturity ladder by enabling new digital capabilities.

    Maturity is heading in the wrong direction.

    Only half of IT practitioners described their department’s maturity as “transform” compared to last year’s survey, and more than twice the number rated themselves as “struggle.”

    A colorful visualization of the IT 'Maturity Ladder' detailing levels of IT function within an organization. Percentages represent answers from IT practitioners to an Info-Tech survey about the maturity level of their company. Starting from the bottom: 13% answered 'Struggle', compared to 6% in 2020; 35% answered 'Support'; 37% answered 'Optimize'; 12% answered 'Expand'; and only 3% answered 'Transform', compared to 6% in 2020.

    48% rate their IT departments as low maturity.

    Improve maturity by focusing on key capabilities to compete in the digital economy

    Capabilities to unlock digital

    Innovation: Identify innovation opportunities and plan how to use technology innovation to create a competitive advantage or achieve improved operational effectiveness and efficiency.

    Human Resources Management: Provide a structured approach to ensure optimal planning, evaluation, and development of human resources.

    Data Architecture: Manage the business’ data stores, including technology, governance, and people that manage them. Establish guidelines for the effective use of data.

    Security Strategy: Define, operate, and monitor a system for information security management. Keep the impact and occurrence of information security incidents within risk appetite levels.

    Business Process Controls and Internal Audit: Manage business process controls such as self-assessments and independent assurance reviews to ensure information related to and used by business processes meets security and integrity requirements. (ISACA, 2020)

    A periodic table-esque arrangement of Info-Tech tools and templates titled 'IT Management and Governance Framework', subtitled 'A comprehensive and connected set of research to help you optimize and improve your core IT processes', and anchored by logos for Info-Tech and COBIT. Color-coded sections with highlighted tools or templates are: 'Strategy and Governance' with 'APO04 Innovation' highlighted; 'People and Resources' with 'APO07 Human Resources Management' highlighted; 'Security and Risk' with 'APO13 Security Strategy' and 'DSS06 MEA02 Business Process Controls and Internal Audit' highlighted; 'Data and BI' with 'ITRG07 Data Architecture' highlighted. Other sections are 'Financial Management', 'Service planning and architecture', 'Infrastructure and operations', 'Apps', and 'PPM and projects'.

    5 Tech Trends for 2022

    In this report, we explore five use cases for emerging technology that can improve on capabilities needed to compete in the digital economy. Use cases combine emerging technologies with new processes and strategic planning.

    DIGITAL ECONOMY

    TREND 01 | Human Resources Management

    HYBRID COLLABORATION
    Provide a digital employee experience that is flexible, contextual, and free from the friction of hybrid operating models.

    TREND 02 | Security Strategy

    BATTLE AGAINST RANSOMWARE
    Prevent ransomware infections and create a response plan for a worst-case scenario. Collaborate with relevant external partners to access resources and mitigate risks.

    TREND 03 | Business Process Controls and Internal Audit

    CARBON METRICS IN ENERGY 4.0
    Use internet of things (IoT) and auditable tracking to provide insight into business process implications for greenhouse gas emissions.

    TREND 04 | Data Architecture

    INTANGIBLE VALUE CREATION
    Provide governance around digital marketplace and manage implications of digital currency. Use blockchain technology to turn unique intellectual property into saleable digital products

    TREND 05 | Innovation

    AUTOMATION AS A SERVICE
    Automate business processes and access new sophisticated technology services through platform integration.

    Hybrid Collaboration

    TREND 01 | HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT

    Provide a digital employee experience that is flexible, contextual, and free from the friction of hybrid operating models.

    Emerging technologies:
    Intelligent conference rooms; intelligent workflows, platforms

    Introduction

    Hybrid work models enable productive, diverse, and inclusive talent ecosystems necessary for the digital economy.

    Hybrid work models have become the default post-pandemic work approach as most knowledge workers prefer the flexibility to choose whether to work remotely or come into the office. CIOs have an opportunity lead hybrid work by facilitating collaboration between employees mixed between meeting at the office and virtually.

    IT departments rose to the challenge to quickly facilitate an all-remote work scenario for their organizations at the outset of the pandemic. Now they must adapt again to facilitate the hybrid work model, which brings new friction to collaboration but also new opportunities to hire a talented, engaged, and diverse workforce.

    79% of organizations will have a mix of workers in the office and at home. (Info-Tech Tech Trends 2022 Survey)

    35% view role type as a determining factor in the feasibility of the hybrid work model.

    Return-to-the-office tensions

    Only 18% of employees want to return to the office full-time.

    But 70% of employers want people back in the office. (CNBC, April 2021)

    Signals

    IT delivers the systems needed to make the hybrid operating model a success.

    IT has an opportunity to lead by defining the hybrid operating model through technology that enables collaboration. To foster collaboration, companies plan to invest in the same sort of tools that helped them cope during the pandemic.

    As 79% of organizations envision a hybrid model going forward, investments into hybrid work tech stacks – including web conferencing tools, document collaboration tools, and team workspaces – are expected to continue into 2022.

    Plans for future investment in collaboration technologies

    Web Conferencing 41%
    Document Collaboration and Co-Authoring 39%
    Team Workspaces 38%
    Instant Messaging 37%
    Project and Task Management Tools 36%
    Office Meeting Room Solutions 35%
    Virtual Whiteboarding 30%
    Intranet Sites 21%
    Enterprise Social Networking 19%
    (Info-Tech Tech Trends 2022 Survey)

    Drivers

    COVID-19

    Vaccination rates around the world are rising and allowing more offices to welcome back workers because the risk of COVID-19 transmission is reduced and jurisdictions are lifting restrictions limiting gatherings.

    Worker satisfaction

    Most workers don't want to go to the office full-time. In a Bloomberg poll (2021), almost half of millennial and Gen Z workers say they would quit their job if not given an option to work remotely.

    IT spending

    Companies are investing more into IT budgets to find ways to support a mix of remote work and in-office resources to cope with work disruption. This extra spending is offset in some cases by companies saving money from having employees work from home some portion of the time. (CIO Dive, 2021)

    Risks and Benefits

    Benefits

    Flexibility Employees able to choose between working from home and working in the office have more control over their work/life balance.
    Intelligence Platforms that track contextual work relationships can accelerate workflows through smart recommendations that connect people at the right time, in the right place.
    Talent Flexible work arrangements provide businesses with access to the best talent available around the world and employees with more career options as they work from a home office (The Official Microsoft Blog, 2021).

    Risks

    Uncertainty The pandemic lacks a clear finish line and local health regulations can still waver between strict control of movement and open movement. There are no clear assurances of what to expect for how we'll work in the near future.
    FOMO With some employees going back to the office while others remain at home, employee bases could be fractured along the lines of those seeing each other in person every day and those still connecting by videoconference.
    Complexity Workers may not know in advance whether they're meeting certain people in person or online, or a mix of the two. They'll have to use technology on the fly to try and collaborate across a mixed group of people in the office and people working remotely (McKinsey Quarterly, 2021).

    “We have to be careful what we automate. Do we want to automate waste? If a company is accustomed to having a ton of meetings and their mode in the new world is to move that online, what are you going to do? You're going to end up with a lot of fatigue and disenchantment…. You have to rethink your methods before you think about the automation part of it." (Vijay Sundaram, Chief Strategy Officer, Zoho)

    Photo of Vijay Sundaram, Chief strategy officer, Zoho.

    Listen to the Tech Insights podcast: Unique approach to hybrid collaboration

    Case Study: Zoho

    Situation

    Zoho Corp. is a cloud software firm based in Chennai, India. It develops a wide range of cloud software, including enterprise collaboration software and productivity tools. Over the past decade, Zoho has used flexible work models to grant remote work options to some employees.

    When the coronavirus pandemic hit, not only did the office have to shut down but also many employees had to relocate back with families in rural areas. The human costs of the pandemic experienced by staff required Zoho to respond by offering counseling services and material support to employees.

    Complication

    Zoho prides itself as an employee-centric company and views its culture as a community that's purpose goes beyond work. That sense of community was lost because of the disruption caused by the pandemic. Employees lost their social context and their work role models. Zoho had to find a way to recreate that without the central hub of the office or find a way to work with the limitations of it not being possible.

    Resolution

    To support employees in rural settings, Zoho sent out phones to provide redundant bandwidth. As lockdowns in India end, Zoho is taking a flexible approach and giving employees the option to come to the office. It's seeing more people come back each week, drawn by the strong community.

    Zoho supports the hybrid mix of workers by balancing synchronous and asynchronous collaboration. It holds meetings when absolutely necessary through tools like Zoho Meet but tries to keep more work context to asynchronous collaboration that allows people to complete tasks quickly and move on. Its applications are connected to a common platform that is designed to facilitate workflows between employees with context and intelligence. (Interview with Vijay Sundaram, Chief Strategy Officer, Zoho)

    “We tend to think of it on a continuum of synchronous to asynchronous work collaboration. It’s become the paramount norm for so many different reasons…the point is people are going to work at different times in different locations. So how do we enable experiences where everyone can participate?" (Jason Brommet, Head of Modern Work and Security Business Group at Microsoft)

    Photo of Jason Brommet, Head of Modern Work and Security Business Group at Microsoft.

    Listen to the Tech Insights podcast: Microsoft on the ‘paradox of hybrid work’

    Case Study: Microsoft

    Situation

    Before the pandemic, only 18% of Microsoft employees were working remotely. As of April 1, 2020, they were joined by the other 82% of non-essential workers at the company in working remotely.

    As with its own customers, Microsoft used its own software to enable this new work experience, including Microsoft Teams for web conferencing and instant messaging and Office 365 for document collaboration. Employees proved just as productive getting their work done from home as they were working in the office.

    Complication

    At Microsoft, the effects of firm-wide remote work changed the collaboration patterns of the company. Even though a portion of the company was working remotely before the pandemic, the effects of everyone working remotely were different. Employees collaborated in a more static and siloed way, focusing on scheduled meetings with existing relationships. Fewer connections were made with more disparate parts of the organization. There was also a decrease in synchronous communication and an increase in asynchronous communication.

    Resolution

    Microsoft is creating new tools to break down the silos in organizations that are grappling with hybrid work challenges. For example, Viva Insights is designed to inform workers about their collaboration habits with analytics. Microsoft wants to provide workers with insights on their collaborative networks and whether they are creating new connections or deepening existing connections. (Interview with Jason Brommet, Head of Modern Work and Security Business Group, Microsoft; Nature Human Behaviour, 2021)

    What's Next?

    Distributed collaboration space:

    International Workplace Group says that more companies are taking advantage of its full network deals on coworking spaces. Companies such as Standard Charter are looking to provide their workers with a happy compromise between working from home and making the commute all the way to the central office. The hub-and-spoke model gives employees the opportunity to work near home and looks to be part of the hybrid operating model mix for many companies. (Interview with Wayne Berger, CEO of IWG Canada & Latin America)

    Optimized hybrid meetings:

    Facilitating hybrid meetings between employees grouped in the office and remote workers will be a major pain point. New hybrid meeting solutions will provide cameras embedded with intelligence to put boardroom participants into independent video streams. They will also focus on making connecting to the same meeting from various locations as convenient as possible and capture clear and crisp audio from each speaker.

    Uncertainties

    Mix between office and remote work:

    It's clear we're not going to work the way we used to previously with central work hubs, but full-on remote work isn't the right path forward either. A new hybrid work model is emerging, and organizations are experimenting to find the right approach.

    Attrition:

    Between April and September 2021, 15 million US workers quit their jobs, setting a record pace. Employees seek a renewed sense of purpose in their work, and many won’t accept mandates to go back to the office. (McKinsey, 2021)

    Equal footing in meetings:

    What are the new best practices for conducting an effective meeting between employees in the office and those who are remote? Some companies ask each employee to connect via a laptop. Others are using conference rooms with tech to group in-office workers together and connect them with remote workers.

    Hybrid Collaboration Scenarios

    Organizations can plan their response to the hybrid work context by plotting their circumstances across two continuums: synchronous to asynchronous collaboration approach and remote work to central hub work model.

    A map of hybrid collaboration scenarios with two axes representing 'Work Context, From all remote work to gathering in a central hub' and 'Collaboration Style, From collaborating at the same time to collaborating at different times'. The axes split the map into quarters. 'Work Context' ranges from 'Remote Work' on the left to 'Central Hub' on the right. 'Collaboration Style' ranges from 'Synchronous' on top to 'Asynchronous' on bottom. The top left quarter, synchronous remote work, reads 'Virtual collective collaboration via videoconference and collaboration software, with some workers meeting in coworking spaces.' The top right quarter, synchronous central hub, reads 'In-person collective collaboration in the office.' The bottom left quarter, asynchronous remote work, reads 'Virtual group collaboration via project tracking tools and shared documents.' The bottom right quarter, asynchronous central hub, reads 'In-person group collaboration in coworking spaces and the main office.'

    Recommendations

    Rethink technology solutions. Don't expect your pre-pandemic videoconference rooms to suffice. And consider how to optimize your facilities and infrastructure for hot-desking scenarios.

    Optimize remote work. Shift from the collaboration approach you put together just to get by to the program you'll use to maximize flexibility.

    Enable effective collaboration. Enable knowledge sharing no matter where and when your employees work and choose the best collaboration software solutions for your scenario.

    Run better meetings. Successful hybrid workplace plans must include planning around hybrid meetings. Seamless hybrid meetings are the result of thoughtful planning and documented best practices.

    89% of organizations invested in web conferencing technology to facilitate better collaboration, but only 43% invested in office meeting room solutions. (Info-Tech Tech Trends 2022 Survey)

    Info-Tech Resources

    Battle Against Ransomware

    TREND 02 | SECURITY STRATEGY

    Prevent ransomware infections and create a response plan for a worst-case scenario. Collaborate with relevant external partners to access resources and mitigate risks.

    Emerging technologies:
    Open source intelligence; AI-powered threat detection

    “It has been a national crisis for some time…. For every [breach] that hits the news there are hundreds that never make it.” (Steve Orrin, Federal Chief Technology Officer, Intel)

    Photo of Steve Orrin, Federal Chief Technology Officer, Intel.

    Listen to the Tech Insights podcast: Ransomware crisis and AI in military

    Introduction

    Between 2019 and 2020, ransomware attacks rose by 62% worldwide and by 158% in North America. (PBS NewsHour, 2021)

    Security strategies are crucial for companies to control access to their digital assets and confidential data, providing it only to the right people at the right time. Now security strategies must adapt to a new caliber of threat in ransomware to avoid operational disruption and reputational damage.

    In 2021, ransomware attacks exploiting flaws in widely used software from vendors Kaseya, SolarWinds, and Microsoft affected many companies and saw record-breaking ransomware payments made to state-sponsored cybercriminal groups.

    After a ransomware attack caused Colonial Pipeline to shut down its pipeline operations across the US, the ransomware issue became a topic of federal attention with executives brought before Senate committees. A presidential task force to combat ransomware was formed.

    62% of IT professionals say they are more concerned about being a victim of ransomware than they were one year ago. (Info-Tech Tech Trends 2022 Survey)

    $70 million demanded by REvil gang in ransom to unlock firms affected by the Kaseya breach. (TechRadar, 2021)

    Signals

    Organizations are taking a multi-faceted approach to preparing for the event of a ransomware breach.

    The most popular methods to prepare for ransomware are to buy an insurance policy or create offline backups and redundant systems. Few are making an effort to be aware of free decryption tools, and only 2% admit to budgeting to pay ransoms.

    44% of IT professionals say they spent time and money specifically to prevent ransomware over the past year. (Info-Tech Tech Trends 2022 Survey)

    Approaches to prepare for ransomware

    Kept aware of free decryption tools available 9%
    Set aside budget to pay ransoms 2%
    Designed network to contain ransomware 24%
    Implemented technology to eradicate ransomware 36%
    Created a specific incident response plan for ransomware 26%
    Created offline backups and redundant systems 41%
    Purchased insurance covering cyberattacks 47%

    (Info-Tech Tech Trends 2022 Survey)

    Drivers

    National security concerns

    Attacks on US infrastructure and government agencies have prompted the White House to treat ransomware as a matter of national security. The government stance is that Russia supports the attacks. The US is establishing new mechanisms to address the threat. Plans include new funding to support ransomware response, a mandate for organizations to report incidents, and requirements for organizations to consider the alternatives before paying a ransom. (Institute for Security and Technology, 2021)

    Advice from cybersecurity insurance providers

    Increases in ransom payouts have caused cybersecurity insurance providers to raise premiums and put in place more security requirements for policyholders to try and prevent ransomware infection. However, when clients are hit with ransomware, insurance providers advise to pay the ransom as it's usually the cheapest option. (ProPublica, 2019)

    Reputational damage

    Ransomware attacks also often include a data breach event with hackers exfiltrating the data before encrypting it. Admitting a breach to customers can seriously damage an organization's reputation as trustworthy. Organizations may also be obligated to pay for credit protection of their customers. (Interview with Frank Trovato, Research Director – Infrastructure, Info-Tech Research Group)

    Risks and Benefits

    Benefits

    Privacy Protecting personal data from theft improves people’s confidence that their privacy is being respected and they are not at risk of identity theft.
    Productivity Ransomware can lock out employees from critical work systems and stop them from being able to complete their tasks.
    Access Ransomware has prevented public access to transportation, healthcare, and any number of consumer services for days at a time. Ransomware prevention ensures public service continuity.

    Risks

    Expenses Investing in cybersecurity measures to protect against attacks is becoming more expensive, and recently cybersecurity insurance premiums have gone up in response to expensive ransoms.
    Friction More security requirements could create friction between IT priorities and business priorities in trying to get work done.
    Stability If ransomware attacks become worse or cybercriminals retaliate for not receiving payments, people could find their interactions with government services and commercial services are disrupted.

    Case Study: Victim to ransomware

    Situation

    In February 2020, a large organization found a ransomware note on an admin’s workstation. They had downloaded a local copy of the organization’s identity management database for testing and left a port open on their workstation. Hackers exfiltrated it and encrypted the data on the workstation. They demanded a ransom payment to decrypt the data.

    Complication

    Because private information of employees and customers was breached, the organization decided to voluntarily inform the state-level regulator. With 250,000 accounts affected, plans were made to require password changes en masse. A public announcement was made two days after the breach to ensure that everyone affected could be reached.

    The organization decided not to pay the ransom because it didn’t need the data back, since it had a copy on an unaffected server.

    Resolution

    After a one-day news cycle for the breach, the story about the ransom was over. The organization also received praise for handling the situation well and quickly informing stakeholders.

    The breach motivated the organization to put more protections in place. It implemented a deny-by-default network and turned off remote desktop protocol and secure shell. It mandated multi-factor authentication and put in a new endpoint-detection and response system. (Interview with CIO of large enterprise)

    What's Next

    AI for cybersecurity:

    New endpoint protections using AI are being deployed to help defend against ransomware and other cybersecurity intrusions. The solutions focus on the prevention and detection of ransomware by learning about the expected behavior of an environment and then detecting anomalies that could be attack attempts. This type of approach can be applied to everything from reading the contents of an email to helping employees detect phishing attempts to lightweight endpoint protection deployed to an Internet of Things device to detect an unusual connection attempt.

    Unfortunately, AI is a tool available to both the cybersecurity industry and hackers. Examples of hackers tampering with cybersecurity AI to bypass it have already surfaced. (Forbes, 23 Sept. 2021)

    Uncertainties

    Government response:

    In the US, the Ransomware Task Force has made recommendations to the government but it's not clear whether all of them will be followed. Other countries such as Russia are reported to be at least tolerating ransomware operations if not supporting them directly with resources.

    Supply chain security:

    Sophisticated attacks using zero-day exploits in widely used software show that organizations simply can't account for every potential vulnerability.

    Arms escalation:

    The ransomware-as-a-service industry is doing good business and finding new ways to evade detection by cybersecurity vendors. New detection techniques involving AI are being introduced by vendors, but will it just be another step in the back-and-forth game of one-upmanship? (Interview with Frank Trovato)

    Battle Against Ransomware Scenarios

    Determine your organization’s threat profile for ransomware by plotting two variables: the investment made in cybersecurity and the sophistication level of attacks that you should be prepared to guard against.

    A map of Battle Against Ransomware scenarios with two axes representing 'Attack Sophistication, From off-the-shelf, ransomware-as-a-service kits to state-sponsored supply chain attacks' and 'Investment in Cybersecurity, From low, minimal investment to high investment for a multi-layer approach.'. The axes split the map into quarters. 'Attack Sophistication' ranges from 'Ransomware as a Service' on the left to 'State-Sponsored' on the right. 'Investment in Cybersecurity' ranges from 'High' on top to 'Low' on bottom. The top left quarter, highly invested ransomware as a service, reads 'Organization is protected from most ransomware attacks and isn’t directly targeted by state-sponsored attacks.' The top right quarter, highly invested state-sponsored, reads 'Organization is protected against most ransomware attacks but could be targeted by state-sponsored attacks if considered a high-value target.' The bottom left quarter, low investment ransomware as a service, reads 'Organization is exposed to most ransomware attacks and is vulnerable to hackers looking to make a quick buck by casting a wide net.' The bottom right quarter, low investment state-sponsored, reads 'Organization is exposed to most ransomware attacks and risks being swept up in a supply chain attack by being targeted or as collateral damage.'

    Recommendations

    Create a ransomware incident response plan. Assess your current security practices and identify gaps. Quantify your ransomware risk to prioritize investments and run tabletop planning exercises for ransomware attacks.

    Reduce your exposure to ransomware. Focus on securing the frontlines by improving phishing awareness among staff and deploying AI tools to help flag attacks. Use multi-factor authentication. Take a zero-trust approach and review your use of RDP, SSH, and VPN.

    Require security in contracts. Security must be built into vendor contracts. Government contracts are now doing this, elevating security to the same level as functionality and support features. This puts money incentives behind improving security. (Interview with Intel Federal CTO Steve Orrin)

    42% of IT practitioners feel employees must do much more to help defend against ransomware. (Info-Tech Tech Trends 2022 Survey)

    Info-Tech Resources

    Carbon Metrics in Energy 4.0

    TREND 03 | BUSINESS PROCESS CONTROLS AND INTERNAL AUDIT

    Use Internet of Things (IoT) and auditable tracking to provide insight into business process implications for greenhouse gas emissions.

    Emerging technologies:
    IoT

    Introduction

    Making progress towards a carbon-neutral future.

    A landmark report published in 2021 by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change underlines that human actions can still determine the future course of climate change. The report calls on governments, individuals, and organizations to stop putting new greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere no later than 2050, and to be at the halfway point to achieving that by 2030.

    With calls to action becoming more urgent, organizations are making plans to reduce the use of fossil fuels, move to renewable energy sources, and reduce consumption that causes more emissions downstream. As both voluntary and mandatory regulatory requirements task organizations with reducing emissions, they will first be challenged to accurately measure the size of their footprint.

    CIOs in organizations are well positioned to make conscious decisions to both influence how technology choices impact carbon emissions and implement effective tracking of emissions across the entire enterprise.

    Canada’s CIO strategy council is calling on organizations to sign a “sustainable IT pledge” to cut emissions from IT operations and supply chain and to measure and disclose emissions annually. (CIO Strategy Council, Sustainable IT Pledge)

    SCOPE 3 – Indirect Consumption

    • Goods and services
    • Fuel, travel, distribution
    • Waste, investments, leased assets, employee activity

    SCOPE 2 – Indirect Energy

    • Electricity
    • Heat and cooling

    SCOPE 1 – Direct

    • Facilities
    • Vehicles

    Signals

    Emissions tracking requires a larger scope.

    About two-thirds of organizations have a commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. When asked about what tactics they use to reduce emissions, the most popular options affect either scope 1 emissions (retiring older IT equipment) or scope 2 emissions (using renewable energy sources). Fewer are using tactics that would measure scope 3 emissions such as using IoT to track or using software or AI.

    68% of organizations say they have a commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. (Info-Tech Tech Trends 2022 Survey)

    Approaches to reducing carbon emissions

    Using "smart technologies" or IoT to help cut emissions 12%
    Creating incentive programs for staff to reduce emissions 10%
    Using software or AI to manage energy use 8%
    Using external DC or cloud on renewable energy 16%
    Committing to external emissions standards 15%
    Retiring/updating older IT equipment 33%
    Using renewable energy sources 41%

    (Info-Tech Tech Trends 2022 Survey)

    Drivers

    Investor pressure

    The world’s largest asset manager, at $7 trillion in investments, says it will move away from investing in firms that are not aligned to the Paris Agreement. (The New York Times, 2020)

    Compliance tipping point

    International charity CDP has been collecting environmental disclosure from organizations since 2002. In 2020, more than 9,600 of the world’s largest companies – representing over 50% of global market value – took part. (CDP, 2021)

    International law

    In 2021, six countries have net-zero emissions policies in law, six have proposed legislations, and 20 have policy documents. (Energy & Climate Intelligence Unit, 2021)

    Employee satisfaction

    In 2019, thousands of workers walked out of offices of Amazon, Google, Twitter, and Microsoft to demand their employers do more to reduce carbon emissions. (NBC News, 2021)

    High influence factors for carbon reduction

    • 25% – New government laws or policies
    • 9% – External social pressures
    • 9% – Pressure from investors
    • 8% – International climate compliance efforts
    • 7% – Employee satisfaction

    (Info-Tech Tech Trends 2022 Survey)

    Risks and Benefits

    Benefits

    Trust Tracking carbon emissions creates transparency into an organization’s operations and demonstrates accountability to its carbon emissions reduction goals.
    Innovation As organizations become more proficient with carbon measurement and modeling, insights can be leveraged as a decision-making tool.
    Resilience Reducing energy usage shrinks your carbon footprint, increases operational efficiency, and decreases energy costs.

    Risks

    Regulatory Divergence Standardization of compliance enforcement around carbon emissions is a work in progress. Several different voluntary frameworks exist, and different governments are taking different approaches including taxation and cap-and-trade markets.
    Perceptions Company communications that speak to emissions reduction targets without providing proof can be accused of “greenwashing” or falsely trying to improve public perception.
    Financial Pain Institutional investments are requiring clear commitments and plans to reduce greenhouse gases. Some jurisdictions are now taxing carbon emissions.

    “When you can take technology and embed that into management change decisions that impact the environment, you can essentially guarantee that [greenhouse gas] offset. Companies that are looking to reduce their emissions can buy those offsets and it creates value for everybody.” (Wade Barnes, CEO and founder of Farmers Edge)

    Photo of Wade Barnes, CEO and founder of Farmers Edge.

    Listen to the Tech Insights podcast: The future of farming is digital

    Case Study

    Situation

    The Alberta Technology Innovation and Emissions Reduction Regulation is Alberta’s approach to reduce emissions from large industrial emitters. It prices GHG and provides a trading system.

    No-till farming and nitrogen management techniques sequester up to 0.3 metric tons of GHG per year.

    Complication

    Farmers Edge offers farmers a digital platform that includes IoT and a unified data warehouse. It can turn farm records into digital environmental assets, which are aggregated and sold to emitters.

    Real-time data from connected vehicles, connected sensors, and other various inputs can be verified by third-party auditors.

    Resolution

    Farmers Edge sold aggregated carbon offsets to Alberta power producer Capital Power to help it meet regulatory compliance.

    Farmers Edge is expanding its platform to include farmers in other provinces and in the US, providing them opportunity to earn revenue via its Smart Carbon program.

    The firm is working to meet standards outlined by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Natural Resources Conservation Service. (Interview with Wade Barnes, CEO, Farmers Edge)

    What's Next

    Global standards:

    The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) has been formed by the International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation and will have its headquarters location announced in November at a United Nations conference. The body is already governing a set of global standards that have a roadmap for development through 2023 through open consultation. The standards are expected to bring together the multiple frameworks for sustainability standards and offer one global set of standards. (Business Council of Canada, 2021)

    CIOs take charge:

    The CIO is well positioned to take the lead role on corporate sustainability initiatives, including measuring and reducing an organization’s carbon footprint (or perhaps even monetizing carbon credits for an organization that is a negative emitter). CIOs can use their position as facilities managers and cross-functional process owners and mandate to reduce waste and inefficiency to take accountability for this important role. CIOs will expand their roles to deliver transparent and auditable reporting on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) goals for the enterprise.

    Uncertainties

    International resolve:

    Fighting the climate crisis will require governments and private sector collaboration from around the world to commit to creating new economic structures to discourage greenhouse gas emissions and incentivize long-term sustainable thinking. If some countries or private sector forces continue to prioritize short-term gains over sustainability, the U.N.’s goals won’t be achieved and the human costs as a result of climate change will become more profound.

    Cap-and-trade markets:

    Markets where carbon credits are sold to emitters are organized by various jurisdictions around the world and have different incentive structures. Some are created by governments and others are voluntary markets created by industry. This type of organization for these markets limits their size and makes it hard to scale the impact. Organizations looking to sell carbon credits at volume face the friction of having to navigate different compliance rules for each market they want to participate in.

    Carbon Metrics in Energy 4.0 Scenarios

    Determine your organization’s approach to measuring carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions by considering whether your organization is likely to be a high emitter or a carbon sink. Also consider your capability to measure and report on your carbon footprint.

    A map of Carbon Metrics in Energy 4.0 scenarios with two axes representing 'Quantification Capability, From not tracking any emissions whatsoever to tracking all emissions at every scope' and 'Greenhouse Gas Emissions, From mitigating more emissions than you create to emitting more than regulations allow'. The axes split the map into quarters. 'Quantification Capability' ranges from 'No Measures' on the left to 'All Emissions Measured' on the right. 'Greenhouse Gas Emissions' ranges from 'More Than Allowed' on top to 'Net-Negative' on bottom. The top left quarter, no measures and more than allowed, reads 'Companies that are likely to be high emitters and not measuring will attract the most scrutiny from regulators and investors.' The top right quarter, all measured and more than allowed, reads 'Companies emit more than regulators allow but the measurements show a clear path to mitigation through the purchase of carbon credits.' The bottom left quarter, no measures and net-negative, reads 'Companies able to achieve carbon neutrality or even be net-negative in emissions but unable to demonstrate it will still face scrutiny from regulators.' The bottom right quarter, all measured and net-negative, reads 'Companies able to remove more emissions than they create have an opportunity to aggregate those reductions and sell on a cap-and-trade market.'

    Recommendations

    Measure the whole footprint. Devise a plan to measure scope 1, 2, and 3 greenhouse gas emissions at a level that is auditable by a third party.

    Gauge the impact of Industry 4.0. New technologies in Industry 4.0 include IoT, additive manufacturing, and advanced analytics. Make sustainability a core part of your focus as you plan out how these technologies will integrate with your business.

    Commit to net zero. Make a clear commitment to achieve net-zero emissions by a specific date as part of your organization’s core strategy. Take a continuous improvement approach to make progress towards the goal with measurable results.

    New laws from governments will have the highest degree of influence on an organization’s decision to reduce emissions. (Info-Tech Tech Trends 2022 Survey)

    Info-Tech Resources

    Intangible Value Creation

    TREND 04 | DATA ARCHITECTURE

    Use blockchain technology to turn unique intellectual property into saleable digital products. Provide governance around marketplaces where sales are made.

    Emerging technologies:
    Blockchain, Distributed Ledger Technology, Virtual Environments

    Introduction

    Decentralized technologies are propelling the digital economy.

    As the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated our shift into virtual social and economic systems, blockchain technology poses a new technological frontier – further disrupting digital interactions and value creation by providing a modification of data without relying on third parties. New blockchain software developments are being used to redefine how central banks distribute currency and to track provenance for scarce digital assets.

    Tokenizing the blockchain

    Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are distinct cryptographic tokens created from blockchain technology. The rarity systems in NFTs are redefining digital ownership and being used to drive creator-centric communities.

    Not crypto-currency, central currency

    Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC) combine the same architecture of cryptocurrencies built on blockchain with the financial authority of a central bank. These currencies are not decentralized because they are controlled by a central authority, rather they are distributed systems. (Decrypt, 2021)

    80% of banks are working on a digital currency. (Atlantic Council, 2021)

    Brands that launched NFTs

    NBA, NFL, Formula 1, Nike, Stella Artois, Coca-Cola, Mattel, Dolce & Gabbana, Ubisoft, Charmin

    Banks that launched digital currencies

    The Bahamas, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Antigua and Barbuda, Saint Lucia, Grenada

    Signals

    ID on the blockchain

    Blockchains can contain smart contracts that automatically execute given specific conditions, protecting stakeholders involved in a transaction. These have been used by central banks to automate when and how currency can be spent and by NFT platforms to attribute a unique identity to a digital asset. Automation and identity verification are the most highly valued digital capabilities of IT practitioners.

    $69.3 million – The world’s most expensive NFT artwork sale, for Beeple’s “Everydays: The First 5,000 Days” (The New York Times, Mar. 2021)

    Digital capabilities that provide high value to the organization

    E-commerce 50%
    Automation 79%
    Smart contracts 42%
    Community building and engagement 55%
    Real-time payments 46%
    Tracking provenance 33%
    Identity verification 74%

    (Info-Tech Tech Trends 2022 Survey)

    Drivers

    Financial autonomy

    Central banks view cryptocurrencies as "working against the public good" and want to maintain control over their financial system to maintain the integrity of payments and provide financial crime oversight and protections against money laundering. (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 2021)

    Bitcoin energy requirements and greenhouse gas emissions

    Annual energy consumption of the Bitcoin blockchain in China is estimated to peak in 2024 at 297 TwH and generate 130.5 million metric tons of carbon emissions. That would exceed the annual GHG of the Czech Republic and Qatar and rank in the top 10 among 182 cities and 42 industrial sectors in China. This is motiving cryptocurrency developers and central banks to move away from the energy-intensive "Proof of Work" mining approach and towards the "Proof of Stake" approach. (Nature Communications, 2021)

    Digital communities

    During the pandemic, people spent more time exploring digital spaces and interacting in digital communities. Asset ownership within those communities is a way for individuals to show their own personal investment in the community and achieve a status that often comes with additional privileges. The digital assets can also be viewed as an investment vehicle or to gain access to exclusive experiences.

    “The pillars of the music economy have always been based on three things that the artist has never had full control of. The idea of distribution is freed up. The way we are going to connect to fans in this direct to fan value prop is very interesting. The fact we can monetize it, and that money exchange, that transaction is immediate. And on a platform like S!NG we legitimately have a platform to community build…. Artists are getting a superpower.” (Raine Maida, Chief Product Officer, S!NG Singer, Our Lady Peace)

    Raine Maida, Chief Product Officer, S!NG, and Singer, Our Lady Peace.

    Listen to the Tech Insights podcast: Raine Maida's startup is an NFT app for music

    Case Study

    Situation

    Artists can create works and distribute them to a wide audience more easily than ever with the internet. Publishing a drawing or a song to a website allows it to be infinitely copied. Creators can use social media accounts and digital advertisements to build up a fan base for their work and monetize it through sales or premium-access subscriber schemes.

    Complication

    The internet's capacity for frictionless distribution is a boon and a burden for artists at the same time. Protecting copyright in a digital environment is difficult because there is no way to track a song or a picture back to its creator. This devalues the work because it can be freely exchanged by users.

    Resolution

    S!NG allows creators to mint their works with a digital token that stamps its origin to the file and tracks provenance as it is reused and adapted into other works. It uses the ERC 721 standard on the Ethereum blockchain to create its NFT tokens. They are portable files that the user can create for free on the S!NG platform and are interoperable with other digital token platforms. This enables a collaboration utility by reducing friction in using other people's works while giving proper attribution. Musicians can create mix tracks using the samples of others’ work easily and benefit from a smart-contract-based revenue structure that returns money to creators when sales are made. (Interview with Geoff Osler and Raine Maida, S!NG Executives)

    Risks and Benefits

    Benefits

    Autonomy Digital money and assets could proliferate the desire for autonomy as users have greater control over their assets (by cutting out the middlemen, democratizing access to investments, and re-claiming ownership over intangible data).
    Community Digital worlds and assets offer integrated and interoperable experiences influenced by user communities.
    Equity Digital assets allow different shareholder equity models as they grant accessible and affordable access to ownership.

    Risks

    Volatility Digital assets are prone to volatile price fluctuations. A primary reason for this is due to its perceived value relative to the fiat currency and the uncertainty around its future value.
    Security While one of the main features of blockchain-based digital assets is security, digital assets are vulnerable to breaches during the process of storing and trading assets.
    Access Access to digital marketplaces requires a steep learning curve and a base level of technical knowledge.

    What's Next

    Into the Metaverse:

    Digital tokens are finding new utility in virtual environments known as the Metaverse. Decentraland is an example of a virtual reality environment that can be accessed via a web browser. Based on the Ethereum blockchain, it's seen sales of virtual land plots for hundreds of thousands of dollars. Sotheby's is one buyer, building a digital replica of its New Bond Street gallery in London, complete with commissionaire Hans Lomuldur in avatar form to greet visitors. The gallery will showcase and sell Sotheby's digital artworks. (Artnet News, 2021)

    Bitcoin as legal tender:

    El Salvador became the first country in the world to make Bitcoin legal tender in September 2021. The government intended for this to help citizens avoid remittance fees when receiving money sent from abroad and to provide a way for citizens without bank accounts to receive payments. Digital wallet Chivo launched with technical glitches and in October a loophole that allowed “price scalping” had to be removed to stop speculators from using the app to trade for profit. El Salvador’s experiment will influence whether other countries consider using Bitcoin as legal tender. (New Scientist, 2021)

    Uncertainties

    Stolen goods at the mint:

    William Shatner complained that Twitter account @tokenizedtweets had taken his content without permission and minted tokens for sale. In doing so, he pointed out there’s no guarantee a minted digital asset is linked to the creator of the attached intellectual property.

    Decentralized vs. distributed finance:

    Will blockchain-based markets be controlled by a single platform operator or become truly open? For example, Dapper Labs centralizes the minting of NFTs on its Flow blockchain and controls sales through its markets. OpenSea allows NFTs minted elsewhere to be brought to the platform and sold.

    Supply and demand:

    Platforms need to improve the reliability of minting technology to create tokens in the future. Ethereum's network is facing more demand than it can keep up with and requires future upgrades to improve its efficiency. Other platforms that support minting tokens are also awaiting upgrades to be fully functional or have seen limited NFT projects launched on their platform.

    Intangible Value Creation Scenarios

    Determine your organization’s strategy by considering the different scenarios based on two main factors. The design decisions are made around whether digital assets are decentralized or distributed and whether the assets facilitate transactions or collections.

    A map of Intangible Value Creation scenarios with two axes representing 'Fungibility, From assets that are designed to be exchanged like currency to assets that are unique' and 'Asset Control Model, From decentralized control with open ownership to centralized control with distributed assets'. The axes split the map into quarters. 'Fungibility' ranges from 'Transactional' on the left to 'Collectible' on the right. 'Asset Control Model' ranges from 'Distributed' on top to 'Decentralized' on bottom. The top left quarter, distributed transactional, reads 'Platform-controlled digital exchanges and utility (e.g. tokens exchanged for fan experiences, central bank digital currency, S!NG).' The top right quarter, distributed collectible, reads 'Platform-controlled digital showcases and community (e.g. NBA Top Shot, Decentraland property).' The bottom left quarter, decentralized transactional, reads 'Peer-controlled digital exchanges and utility (e.g. Bitcoin).' The bottom right quarter, decentralized collectible, reads 'Peer-controlled digital showcases and community (e.g. OpenSea and Ethereum-based NFTs).'

    Recommendations

    Determine your role in the digital asset ecosystem.
    • Becoming a platform provider for digital tokens will require a minting capability to create blockchain-based assets and a marketplace for users to exchange them.
    • Issuing digital tokens to a platform through a sale will require making partnerships and marketing.
    • Investing in digital assets will require management of digital wallets and subject-matter expert analysis of the emerging markets.
    Track the implications of digital currencies.

    Track what your country’s central bank is planning for digital currency and determine if you’ll need to prepare to support it. Be informed about payment partner support for cryptocurrency and consider any complications that may introduce.

    $1 billion+ – The amount of cryptocurrency spent by consumers globally through crypto-linked Visa cards in first half of 2021. (CNBC, July 2021)

    Info-Tech Resources

    Automation as a Service

    TREND 05 | INNOVATION

    Automate business processes and access new sophisticated technology services through platform integration.

    Emerging technologies:
    Cloud platforms, APIs, Generative AI

    Introduction

    The glue for innovation

    Rapidly constructing a business model that is ready to compete in a digital economy requires continuous innovation. Application programming interfaces (APIs) can accelerate innovation by unlocking marketplaces of ready-to-use solutions to business problems and automating manual tasks to make more time for creativity. APIs facilitate a microarchitecture approach and make it possible to call upon a new capability with a few lines of code. This is not a new tool, as the first API was specified in 1951, but there were significant advances of both scale and capability in this area in 2021.

    In the past 18 months, API adoption has exploded and even industries previously considered as digital laggards are now integrating them to reinvent back-office processes. Technology platforms specializing in API management are attracting record-breaking investment. And sophisticated technology services such as artificial intelligence are being delivered by APIs.

    APIs can play a role in every company’s digital strategy, from transforming back-office processes to creating revenue as part of a platform.

    $500,000 was invested in API companies in 2016. (Forbes, May 2021)

    $2,000,000,000+ was invested in API companies in 2020. (Forbes, May 2021)

    69% of IT practitioners say digital transformation has been a high priority for their organization during the pandemic. (Info-Tech Tech Trends 2022 Survey)

    51% of developers used more APIs in 2020 than in 2019. (InsideHPC, 2021)

    71% of developers planned to use even more APIs in 2021. (InsideHPC, 2021)

    Signals

    IT practitioners indicate that digital transformation was a strong focus for their organization during the pandemic and will remain so during the period afterwards, and one-third say their organizations were “extremely focused” on digital transformation.

    When it came to shifting processes from being done manually to being completed digitally, more than half of IT practitioners say they shifted at least 21% of their processes during the past year. More than one in five say that at least 60% of their processes were shifted from manual to digital in the past year.

    3.5 trillion calls were performed on API management platform Apigee, representing a 50% increase year over year. (SiliconANGLE, 2021)

    Processes shifted from manual to digital in the past year

    A horizontal bar chart recording survey responses regarding the percent of processes that shifted from manual to digital in the past year. The horizontal axis is 'percent of survey respondents' with values from 0 to 35%. The vertical axis is 'percent of process shifted to digital' with bar labels 'Between 0 to 20%', 'Between 21 to 40%', and so on until 'Between 81 to 100%'. 20% of respondents answered '0 to 20%' of processes went digital. 28% of respondents answered '21 to 40%' of processes went digital. 30% of respondents answered '41 to 60%' of processes went digital. 15% of respondents answered '61 to 80%' of processes went digital. 7% of respondents answered '81 to 100%' of processes went digital.

    Drivers

    Covid-19

    The pandemic lockdowns pushed everyone into a remote-work scenario. With in-person interaction not an option, even more traditional businesses had to adapt to digital processes.

    Customer Expectations

    The success of digital services in the consumer space is causing expectations to rise in other areas, such as professional services. Consumers now want their health records to be portable and they want to pay their lawyer through e-transfer, not by writing a cheque. (Interview with Mik Lernout)

    Standardization

    Technology laggard industries such as legal and healthcare are recognizing the pain of working with siloed systems. New standardization efforts are driving the adoption of open APIs at a rapid rate. (Interview with Jennifer Jones, Research Director – Industry, Info-Tech Research Group)

    Risks and Benefits

    Benefits

    Speed Using a microarchitecture approach with readily available services constructed in different ways provides a faster way to get from idea to minimum-viable product.
    Intelligence Open APIs have more than ever exposed people to sophisticated AI algorithms that were in the domain of only advanced researchers just a couple years ago. Developers can integrate AI with a couple lines of code. Non-technical users can train algorithms with low-code and no-code tools (Forbes, Sept. 2021).
    Resilience If one function of a solution doesn't work, it can be easily replaced with another one available on the market and the overall experience is maintained.

    Risks

    Loss of Privacy APIs are being targeted by hackers as a way to access personal information. Recent API-related leaks affected Experian, John Deere, Clubhouse, and Peloton (VentureBeat, 2021).
    Complexity Using a decentralized approach to assemble applications means that there is no single party accountable for the solution. Different pieces can break, or oversights can go unnoticed.
    Copycats Platforms that take the approach of exposing all functions via API run the risk of having their services used by a competitor to offer the same solution but with an even better user experience.

    “When we think about what the pandemic did, we had this internal project called 'back to the future.' It kind of put the legal industry in a time machine and it kind of accelerated the legal industry 5, maybe even 10 years. A lot of the things we saw with the innovators became table stakes.” (Mik Lernout, Vice President of Product, Clio)

    Photo of Mik Lernout, Vice president of product, Clio.

    Listen to the Tech Insights podcast: Clio drives digital transformation to redefine the legal industry

    Case Study

    Situation

    The COVID-19 pandemic required the legal industry to shift to remote work. A typically change-resistant industry was now holding court hearings over videoconference, taking online payments, and collecting e-signatures on contracts. For Clio, a software-as-a-service software vendor that serves the legal industry, its client base grew and its usage increased. It previously focused on the innovators in the legal industry, but now it noticed laggards were going digital too.

    Complication

    Law firms have very different needs depending on their legal practice area (e.g. family law, corporate law, or personal injury) and what jurisdiction they operate in.

    Clients are also demanding more from their lawyers in terms of service experience. They don't want to travel to the law office to drop off a check but expect digital interactions on par with service they receive in other areas.

    Resolution

    Since its inception, Clio built its software product so that all of its functions could be called upon by an API as well. It describes its platform as the "operating system for the legal industry." Its API functions include capabilities like managing activities, billing, and contracts. External developers can submit applications to the Clio Marketplace to add new functionality. Its platform approach enables it to find solutions for its 150,000+ users. During the pandemic, Clio saw its customers rely on its APIs more than ever before. It expects this accelerated adoption to be the way of working in the future. (ProgrammableWeb, 2021; Interview with Mik Lernout)

    What's Next

    GOOGLE’S API-FIRST APPROACH:

    Google is expanding its Apigee API management platform so enterprises will be able to connect existing data and applications and access them via APIs. It's part of Google's API-first approach to digital transformation, helping enterprises with their integration challenges. The new release includes tools and a framework that's needed to integrate services in this way and includes pre-built connectors for common business apps and services such as Salesforce, Cloud SQL, MySQL, and BigQuery. (SiliconANGLE, 2021)

    Uncertainties

    API SECURITY:

    APIs represent another potential vulnerability for hackers to exploit and the rise in popularity has come with more security incidents. Companies using APIs have leaked data through APIs, with one research report on the state of API security finding that 91% of organizations have suffered an API security incident. Yet more than a quarter of firms running production APIs don’t have an API security strategy. (VentureBeat, 2021)

    For low IT maturity organizations moving onto platforms that introduce API capabilities, education is required about the consequences of creating more integrations. Platforms must bear some responsibility for monitoring for irregular activity. (Interview with Mik Lernout)

    Automation as a Service Scenarios

    Determine your organization’s platform strategy from the basis of your digital maturity – from that of a laggard to a native – and whether it involves monetized APIs vs. freely available public APIs. A strategy can include both the consumption of APIs and the creation of them.

    A map of Automation as a Service scenarios with two axes representing 'Business Model, From an open and public API to a monetized pay-for-use API' and 'Digital Maturity, From being a digital laggard to being a digital native'. The axes split the map into quarters. 'Business Model' ranges from 'Public APIs' on the left to 'Monetized APIs' on the right. 'Digital Maturity' ranges from 'Digital Native' on top to 'Digital Laggard' on bottom. The top left quarter, digital native public APIs, reads 'Platform business model that grows through adoption of free APIs (e.g. Clio).' The top right quarter, digital native monetized APIS, reads 'Platform business model with spectrum of API services including free tiers.' The bottom left quarter, digital laggard public APIs, reads 'Consume public APIs to simplify and automate business processes and improve customer experience (e.g. law firms using Clio).' The bottom right quarter, digital laggard monetized APIs, reads 'Consume paid APIs to provide customers with expanded services (e.g. retailer Lowe’s uses AccuWeather to predict supply and demand).'

    Recommendations

    Leverage APIs to connect your systems. Create a repeatable process to improve the quality, reusability, and governance of your web APIs.

    Transform your business model with digital platforms. Use the best practices of digital native enterprises and leverage your core assets to compete in a digital economy.

    Deliver sophisticated new capabilities with APIs. Develop an awareness of new services made available through API integration, such as artificial intelligence, and take advantage of them.

    4.5 billion words per day generated by the OpenAI natural language API GPT-3, just nine months after launch. (OpenAI, 2021)

    Info-Tech Resources

    Behind the design

    Inspiration provided by the golden ratio

    The golden ratio has long fascinated humans for its common occurrence in nature and inspired artists who adopted its proportions as a guiding principle for their creations. A new discovery of the golden ratio in economic cycles was published in August 2021 by Bert de Groot, et al. As the boundaries of value creation blur between physical and digital and the pace of change accelerates, these digital innovations may change our lives in many ways. But they are still bound by the context of the structure of the economy. Hear more about this surprising finding from de Groot and from this report’s designer by listening to our podcast. (Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021)

    “Everything happening will adapt itself into the next cycle, and that cycle is one phi distance away.” (Bert de Groot, professor of economics at Erasmus University Rotterdam)

    Photo of Bert de Groot, Professor of Economics at Erasmus University Rotterdam.

    Listen to the Tech Insights podcast: New discovery of the golden ratio in the economy

    Contributing Experts

    Vijay Sundaram
    Chief Strategy Officer, Zoho
    Photo of Vijay Sundaram, Chief Strategy Officer, Zoho.
    Jason Brommet
    Head of Modern Work and Security Business Group, Microsoft
    Photo of Jason Brommet, Head of Modern Work and Security Business Group at Microsoft.
    Steve Orrin
    Federal Chief Technology Officer, Intel
    Photo of Steve Orrin, Federal Chief Technology Officer, Intel.
    Wade Barnes
    CEO and Founder, Farmers Edge
    Photo of Wade Barnes, CEO and founder of Farmers Edge.

    Contributing Experts

    Raine Maida
    Chief Product Officer, S!NG
    Singer, Our Lady Peace
    Raine Maida, Chief Product Officer, S!NG Singer, Our Lady Peace.
    Geoff Osler
    CEO, S!NG
    Photo of Geoff Osler, CEO, S!NG.
    Mik Lernout
    Vice President of Product, Clio
    Photo of Mik Lernout, Vice President of Product, Clio.
    Bert de Groot
    Professor of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam
    Photo of Bert de Groot, Professor of Economics at Erasmus University Rotterdam.

    Bibliography – Enabling the Digital Economy

    “2021 Canada Dealer Financing Satisfaction Study.” J.D. Power, 13 May 2021. Accessed 27 May 2021.

    Brown, Sara. “The CIO Role Is Changing. Here’s What’s on the Horizon.” MIT Sloan, 2 Aug. 2021. Accessed 16 Aug. 2021.

    de Groot, E. A., et al. “Disentangling the Enigma of Multi-Structured Economic Cycles - A New Appearance of the Golden Ratio.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 169, Aug. 2021, pp. 120793. ScienceDirect, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120793.

    Hatem, Louise, Daniel Ker, and John Mitchell. “Roadmap toward a common framework for measuring the Digital Economy.” Report for the G20 Digital Economy Task Force, OECD, 2020. Accessed 19 Oct. 2021.

    LaBerge, Laura, et al. “How COVID-19 has pushed companies over the technology tipping point—and transformed business forever.” McKinsey, 5 Oct. 2020. Accessed 14 June 2021.

    Pomeroy, James. The booming digital economy. HSBC, Sept. 2020. Web.

    Salman, Syed. “Digital Transformation Realized Through COBIT 2019.” ISACA, 13 Oct. 2020. Accessed 25 Oct. 2021.

    Bibliography – Hybrid Collaboration

    De Smet, Aaron, et al. “Getting Real about Hybrid Work.” McKinsey Quarterly, 9 July 2021. Web.

    Herskowitz, Nicole. “Brace Yourselves: Hybrid Work Is Hard. Here’s How Microsoft Teams and Office 365 Can Help.” Microsoft 365 Blog, 9 Sept. 2021. Web.

    Melin, Anders, and Misyrlena Egkolfopoulou. “Employees Are Quitting Instead of Giving Up Working From Home.” Bloomberg, 1 June 2021. Web.

    Spataro, Jared. “Microsoft and LinkedIn Share Latest Data and Innovation for Hybrid Work.” The Official Microsoft Blog, 9 Sept. 2021. Web.

    Subin, Samantha. “The new negotiation over job benefits and perks in post-Covid hybrid work.” CNBC, 23 Apr. 2021. Web.

    Torres, Roberto. “How to Sidestep Overspend as Hybrid Work Tests IT.” CIO Dive, 26 July 2021. Accessed 16 Sept. 2021.

    Wong, Christine. “How the hybrid workplace will affect IT spending.” ExpertIP, 15 July 2021. Web.

    Yang, Longqi, et al. “The Effects of Remote Work on Collaboration among Information Workers.” Nature Human Behaviour, Sept. 2021, pp. 1-12. Springer Nature, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01196-4.

    Bibliography – Battle Against Ransomware

    Berg, Leandro. “RTF Report: Combatting Ransomware.” Institute for Security and Technology (IST), 2021. Accessed 21 Sept. 2021.

    Dudley, Renee. “The Extortion Economy: How Insurance Companies Are Fueling a Rise in Ransomware Attacks.” ProPublica, 27 Aug. 2019. Accessed 22 Sept. 2021.

    Durbin, Steve. “Council Post: Artificial Intelligence: The Future Of Cybersecurity?” Forbes, 23 Sept. 2021. Accessed 21 Oct. 2021.

    “FACT SHEET: Ongoing Public U.S. Efforts to Counter Ransomware.” The White House, 13 Oct. 2021. Web.

    Jeffery, Lynsey, and Vignesh Ramachandran. “Why ransomware attacks are on the rise — and what can be done to stop them.” PBS NewsHour, 8 July 2021. Web.

    McBride, Timothy, et al. Data Integrity: Recovering from Ransomware and Other Destructive Events. NIST Special Publication (SP) 1800-11, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 22 Sept. 2020. NIST Computer Security Resource Center (CSRC), https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1800-11.

    Mehrotra, Karitkay, and Jennifer Jacobs. “Crypto Channels Targeted in Biden’s Fight Against Ransomware.” BNN Bloomberg, 21 Sept. 2021. Web.

    Sharma, Mayank. “Hackers demand $70m ransom after executing massive Solar Winds-like attack.” TechRadar, 5 July 2021. Web.

    “Unhacked: 121 Tools against Ransomware on a Single Website.” Europol, 26 July 2021. Web.

    Bibliography – Carbon Metrics in Energy 4.0

    “The A List 2020.” CDP, 2021. Web.

    Baazil, Diedrik, Hugo Miller, and Laura Hurst. “Shell loses climate case that may set precedent for big oil.” Australian Financial Review, 27 May 2021. Web.

    “BlackRock’s 2020 Carbon Footprint.” BlackRock, 2020. Accessed 25 May 2021.

    “CDP Media Factsheet.” CDP, n.d. Accessed 25 May 2021.

    Glaser, April, and Leticia Miranda. “Amazon workers demand end to pollution hitting people of color hardest.” NBC News, 24 May 2021. Accessed 25 May 2021.

    Little, Mark. “Why Canada should be the home of the new global sustainability standards board.” Business Council of Canada, 1 Oct. 2021. Accessed 22 Oct. 2021.

    McIntyre, Catherine. “Canada vying for global headquarters to oversee sustainable-finance standards.” The Logic, 22 July 2021. Web.

    “Net Zero Scorecard.” Energy & Climate Intelligence Unit, 2021. Accessed 25 May 2021.

    Sayer, Peter. “Greenhouse gas emissions: The next big issue for CIOs.” CIO, 13 Oct. 2021. Web.

    “Scope 1 and Scope 2 Inventory Guidance.” US EPA, OAR. 14 Dec. 2020. Web.

    Sorkin, Andrew Ross. “BlackRock C.E.O. Larry Fink: Climate Crisis Will Reshape Finance.” The New York Times, 14 Jan. 2020. Web.

    “Sustainable IT Pledge.” CIO Strategy Council, 2021. Accessed 22 Oct. 2021.

    Bibliography – Intangible Value Creation

    Areddy, James T. “China Creates Its Own Digital Currency, a First for Major Economy.” Wall Street Journal, 5 Apr. 2021. Web.

    Boar, Codruta, et al. Impending arrival - a sequel to the survey on central bank digital currency. BIS Papers No 107, Jan. 2020. Web.

    Brainard, Lael. “Speech by Governor Brainard on Private Money and Central Bank Money as Payments Go Digital: An Update on CBDCs.” Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 24 May 2021. Accessed 28 May 2021.

    Howcroft, Elizabeth, and Ritvik Carvalho. “How a 10-second video clip sold for $6.6 million.” Reuters, 1 Mar. 2021. Web.

    “Central Bank Digital Currency Tracker.” Atlantic Council, 2021. Accessed 10 Sept. 2021.

    “Expert Comment From Warwick Business School: Problems With El Salvador’s Bitcoin Experiment Are Unsurprising.” Mondo Visione, 8 Sept. 2021. Accessed 10 Sept. 2021.

    Goldstein, Caroline. “In Its Ongoing Bid to Draw Crypto-Collectors, Sotheby’s Unveils a Replica of Its London H.Q. in the Blockchain World Decentraland.” Artnet News, 7 June 2021. Web.

    Hamacher, Adriana. “Taco Bell to Charmin: 10 Big Brands Jumping On The NFT Bandwagon.” Decrypt, 22 Mar. 2021. Web.

    Hazan, Eric, et al. “Getting tangible about intangibles: The future of growth and productivity?” McKinsey. 16 June 2021. Web.

    Bibliography – Intangible Value Creation

    Herrera, Pedro. “Dapp Industry Report: Q3 2021 Overview.” DappRadar, 1 Oct. 2021. Web.

    Holland, Frank. “Visa Says Crypto-Linked Card Usage Tops $1 Billion in First Half of 2021.” CNBC, 7 July 2021. Web.

    Jiang, Shangrong, et al. “Policy Assessments for the Carbon Emission Flows and Sustainability of Bitcoin Blockchain Operation in China.” Nature Communications, vol. 12, no. 1, Apr. 2021, p. 1938. Springer Nature, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22256-3.

    Reyburn, Scott. “JPG File Sells for $69 Million, as ‘NFT Mania’ Gathers Pace.” The New York Times, 11 Mar. 2021. Web.

    Taylor, Luke. “Bitcoin: El Salvador’s Cryptocurrency Gamble Hit by Trading Loophole.” New Scientist, 25 Oct. 2021. Web.

    Bibliography – Automation as a Service

    Belsky, Scott. “The Furry Lisa, CryptoArt, & The New Economy Of Digital Creativity.” Medium, 21 Feb. 2021. Web.

    Culbertson, Joy. “10 Top Law APIs.” ProgrammableWeb, 14 Feb. 2021. Web.

    Caballar, Rina Diane. “Programming by Voice May Be the Next Frontier in Software Development - IEEE Spectrum.” IEEE Spectrum: Technology, Engineering, and Science News, 22 Mar 2021. Accessed 23 Mar. 2021.

    Gonsalves, Chris. “The Problem with APIs.” VentureBeat, 7 May 2021. Web.

    Graca, Joao. “Council Post: How APIs Are Democratizing Access To AI (And Where They Hit Their Limits).” Forbes, 24 Sept 2021. Accessed 28 Sept. 2021.

    Harris, Tony. “What is the API Economy?” API Blog: Everything You Need to Know, 4 May 2021. Web.

    Kitsing, Meelis. Scenarios for Digital Platform Ecosystems, 2020, pp. 453-57. ResearchGate, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCS49078.2020.9118571.

    Pilipiszyn, Ashley. “GPT-3 Powers the Next Generation of Apps.” OpenAI, 25 Mar. 2021. Web.

    Rethans, John. “So You Want to Monetize Your APIs?” APIs and Digital Transformation, 29 June 2018. Web.

    Bibliography – Automation as a Service

    Salyer, Patrick. “API Stack: The Billion Dollar Opportunities Redefining Infrastructure, Services & Platforms.” Forbes, 4 May 2021. Accessed 27 Oct. 2021.

    staff. “RapidAPI Raises $60M for Expansion of API Platform.” InsideHPC, 21 Apr. 2021. Web.

    Taulli, Tom. “API Economy: Is It The Next Big Thing?” Forbes, 18 Jan. 2021. Accessed 5 May 2021.

    Warren, Zach. “Clio Taking 2021 Cloud Conference Virtual, Announces New Mission Among Other News.” Legaltech News, 11 Mar. 2021. Web.

    Wheatley, Mike. “Google Announces API-First Approach to Application Data Integration with Apigee.” SiliconANGLE, 28 Sept. 2021. Web.

    About the research

    Tech trends survey

    As part of its research process for the 2022 Tech Trends Report, Info-Tech Research Group conducted an open online survey among its membership and wider community of professionals. The survey was fielded from August 2021 to September 2021, collecting 475 responses.

    The underlying metrics are diverse, capturing 14 countries and regions and 16 Industries.

    A geospatial chart of the world documenting the percentage of respondents from each country to Info-Tech's '2022 Tech Trends Report' Percentages are below.
    01 United States 45.3% 08 India 1.7%
    02 Canada 19.2% 09 Other (Asia) 1.7%
    03 Africa 9.3% 10 New Zealand 1.5%
    04 Other (Europe) 5.3% 11 Germany 0.8%
    05 Australia 4.2% 12 Mexico 0.4%
    06 Great Britain 3.8% 13 Netherlands 0.4%
    07 Middle East 2.9% 14 Japan 0.2%

    Industry

    01 Government 18.9%
    02 Media, Information, & Technology 12.8%
    03 Professional Services 12.8%
    04 Manufacturing 9.9%
    05 Education 8.8%
    06 Healthcare 8.2%
    07 Financial Services 7.8%
    08 Transportation & Logistics 3.4%
    09 Utilities 3.4%
    10 Insurance 2.5%
    11 Retail & Wholesale 2.5%
    12 Construction 2.3%
    13 Natural Resources 2.1%
    14 Real Estate & Property Management 1.7%
    15 Arts & Leisure 1.5%
    16 Professional Associations 1.3%

    Department

    IT (information technology) 88.2%
    Other (Department) 3.79%
    Operations 2.32%
    Research & Development 1.89%
    Sales 1.26%
    Administration 1.06%
    Finance 0.42%
    HR (Human Resources) 0.42%
    Marketing 0.42%
    Production 0.21%

    Role

    Manager 24%
    Director-level 22%
    C-level officer 19%
    VP-level 9%
    Team lead / supervisor 7%
    Owner / President / CEO 7%
    Team member 7%
    Consultant 5%
    Contractor 1%

    IT Spend

    Respondents on average spent 35 million per year on their IT budget.

    Accounting for the outlier responses – the median spend sits closer to 4.5 million per year. The highest spend on IT was within the Government, Healthcare, and Retail & Wholesale sectors.

    Become a Transformational CIO

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}86|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Innovation
    • Parent Category Link: /innovation
    • Business transformations are happening, but CIOs are often involved only when it comes time to implement change. This makes it difficult for the CIO to be perceived as an organizational leader.
    • CIOs find it difficult to juggle operational activities, strategic initiatives, and involvement in business transformation.
    • CIOs don’t always have the IT organization structured and mobilized in a manner that facilitates the identification of transformation opportunities, and the planning for and the implementation of organization-wide change.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Don’t take an ad hoc approach to transformation.
    • You’re not in it alone.
    • Your legacy matters

    Impact and Result

    • Elevate your stature as a business leader.
    • Empower the IT organization to act with a business mind first, and technology second.
    • Create a high-powered IT organization that is focused on driving lasting change, improving client experiences, and encouraging collaboration across the entire enterprise.
    • Generate opportunities for organizational growth, as manifested through revenue growth, profit growth, new market entry, new product development, etc.

    Become a Transformational CIO Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our Executive Brief to find out why you should undergo an evolution in your role as a business leader, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Are you ready to lead transformation?

    Determine whether you are ready to focus your attention on evolving your role.

    • Become a Transformational CIO – Phase 1: Are You Ready to Lead Transformation?

    2. Build business partnerships

    Create a plan to establish key business partnerships and position IT as a co-leader of transformation.

    • Become a Transformational CIO – Phase 2: Build Business Partnerships
    • Partnership Strategy Template

    3. Develop the capability to transform

    Mobilize the IT organization and prepare for the new mandate.

    • Become a Transformational CIO – Phase 3: Develop the Capability to Transform
    • Transformation Capability Assessment

    4. Shift IT’s focus to the customer

    Align IT with the business through a direct, concentrated focus on the customer.

    • Become a Transformational CIO – Phase 4: Shift IT’s Focus to the Customer
    • Transformational CIO Value Stream Map Template
    • Transformational CIO Business Capability Map Template

    5. Adopt a transformational approach to leadership

    Determine the key behaviors necessary for transformation success and delegate effectively to make room for new responsibilities.

    • Become a Transformational CIO – Phase 5: Adopt a Transformational Approach to Leadership
    • Office of the CIO Template

    6. Sustain the transformational capability

    Track the key success metrics that will help you manage transformation effectively.

    • Become a Transformational CIO – Phase 6: Sustain the Transformational Capability
    • Transformation Dashboard
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Become a Transformational CIO

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Determine Readiness to Become a Transformational CIO

    The Purpose

    Understand stakeholder and executive perception of the CIO’s performance and leadership.

    Determine whether the CIO is ready to lead transformation.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Decision to evolve role or address areas of improvement as a pre-requisite to becoming a transformational CIO.

    Activities

    1.1 Select data collection techniques.

    1.2 Conduct diagnostic programs.

    1.3 Review results and define readiness.

    Outputs

    Select stakeholder and executive perception of the CIO

    Decision as to whether to proceed with the role evolution

    2 Build Business Partnerships

    The Purpose

    Identify potential business partners and create a plan to establish key partnerships.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    An actionable set of initiatives that will help the CIO create valuable partnerships with internal or external business stakeholders.

    Activities

    2.1 Identify potential business partners.

    2.2 Evaluate and prioritize list of potential partners.

    2.3 Create a plan to establish the target partnerships.

    Outputs

    Partnership strategy

    3 Establish IT’s Ability to Transform

    The Purpose

    Make the case and plan for the development of key capabilities that will enable the IT organization to handle transformation.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A maturity assessment of critical capabilities.

    A plan to address maturity gaps in preparation for a transformational mandate.

    Activities

    3.1 Define transformation as a capability.

    3.2 Assess the current and target transformation capability maturity.

    3.3 Develop a roadmap to address gaps.

    Outputs

    Transformation capability assessment

    Roadmap to develop the transformation capability

    4 Shift IT’s Focus to the Customer

    The Purpose

    Gain an understanding of the end customer of the organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A change in IT mindset away from a focus on operational activities or internal customers to external customers.

    A clear understanding of how the organization creates and delivers value to customers.

    Opportunities for business transformation.

    Activities

    4.1 Analyze value streams that impact the customer.

    4.2 Map business capabilities to value streams.

    Outputs

    Value stream maps

    Business capability map

    5 Establish Transformation Leadership and Sustain the Capability

    The Purpose

    Establish a formal process for empowering employees and developing new leaders.

    Create a culture of continuous improvement and a long-term focus.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Increased ability to sustain momentum that is inherent to business transformations.

    Better strategic workforce planning and a clearer career path for individuals in IT.

    A system to measure IT’s contribution to business transformation.

    Activities

    5.1 Set the structure for the office of the CIO.

    5.2 Assess current leadership skills and needs.

    5.3 Spread a culture of self-discovery.

    5.4 Maintain the transformation capability.

    Outputs

    OCIO structure document

    Transformational leadership dashboard

    Drive Business Value With a Right-Sized Project Gating Process

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}445|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $61,999 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 21 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Portfolio Management
    • Parent Category Link: /portfolio-management
    • Low sponsor commitment on projects.
    • Poor quality on completed projects.
    • Little to no visibility into the project portfolio.
    • Organization does not operationalize change .
    • Analyzing, fixing, and redeploying is a constant struggle. Even when projects are done well, they fail to deliver the intended outcomes and benefits.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Stop applying a one-size-fits-all-projects approach to governance.
    • Engage the sponsor by shifting the accountability to the business so they can get the most out of the project.
    • Do not limit the gating process to project management – expand to portfolio management.

    Impact and Result

    • Increase Project Throughput: Do more projects by ensuring the right projects and right amount of projects are approved and executed.
    • Validate Project Quality: Ensure issues are uncovered and resolved with standard check points in the project.
    • Increase Reporting and Visibility: Easily compare progress of projects across the portfolio and report outcomes to leadership.
    • Reduce Resource Waste: Terminate low-value projects early and assign the right resources to approved projects.
    • Achieve Intended Project Outcomes: Keep the sponsor engaged throughout the gating process to achieve desired outcomes.

    Drive Business Value With a Right-Sized Project Gating Process Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should design a right-sized project gating process, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Lay the groundwork for tailored project gating

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

  • Understand the role of gating and why we need it.
  • Determine what projects will follow the gating process and how to classify them.
  • Establish the role of the project sponsor throughout the entire project lifecycle.
    • Drive Business Value With a Right-Sized Project Gating Process – Phase 1: Lay the Groundwork for Tailored Project Gating
    • Project Intake Classification Matrix
    • Project Sponsor Role Description Template

    2. Establish level 1 project gating

    This phase will help you customize Level 1 Project Gates with appropriate roles and responsibilities.

    • Drive Business Value With a Right-Sized Project Gating Process – Phase 2: Establish Level 1 Project Gating
    • Project Gating Strategic Template

    3. Establish level 2 project gating

    This phase will help you customize Level 2 Project Gates with appropriate roles and responsibilities.

    • Drive Business Value With a Right-Sized Project Gating Process – Phase 3: Establish Level 2 Project Gating

    4. Establish level 3 project gating

    This phase will help you customize Level 3 Project Gates with appropriate roles and responsibilities. It will also help you determine next steps and milestones for the adoption of the new process.

    • Drive Business Value With a Right-Sized Project Gating Process – Phase 4: Establish Level 3 Project Gating
    • Project Gating Reference Document
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Drive Business Value With a Right-Sized Project Gating Process

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Lay the Groundwork for Tailored Project Gating

    The Purpose

    Understand the role of gating and why we need it.

    Determine what projects will follow the gating process and how to classify them.

    Establish the role of the project sponsor throughout the entire project lifecycle.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Get stakeholder buy-in for the process.

    Ensure there is a standard leveling process to determine size, risk, and complexity of requests.

    Engage the project sponsor throughout the portfolio and project processes.

    Activities

    1.1 Project Gating Review

    1.2 Establish appropriate project levels

    1.3 Define the role of the project sponsor

    Outputs

    Project Intake Classification Matrix

    Project Sponsor Role Description Template

    2 Establish Level 1 Project Gating

    The Purpose

    This phase will help you customize Level 1 Project Gates with appropriate roles and responsibilities.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Create a lightweight project gating process for small projects.

    Activities

    2.1 Review level 1 project gating process

    2.2 Determine what gates should be part of your custom level 1 gating process

    2.3 Establish required artifacts for each gate

    2.4 Define the stakeholder’s roles and responsibilities at each gate

    Outputs

    Documented outputs in the Project Gating Strategic Template

    3 Establish Level 2 Project Gating

    The Purpose

    This phase will help you customize Level 2 Project Gates with appropriate roles and responsibilities.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Create a heavier project gating process for medium projects.

    Activities

    3.1 Review level 2 project gating process

    3.2 Determine what gates should be part of your custom level 2 gating process

    3.3 Establish required artifacts for each gate

    3.4 Define the stakeholder’s roles and responsibilities at each gate

    Outputs

    4 Establish Level 3 Project Gating

    The Purpose

    This phase will help you customize Level 3 Project Gates with appropriate roles and responsibilities.

    Come up with a roadmap for the adoption of the new project gating process.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Create a comprehensive project gating process for large projects.

    Activities

    4.1 Review level 3 project gating process

    4.2 Determine what gates should be part of your custom level 3 gating process

    4.3 Establish required artifacts for each gate

    4.4 Define the stakeholder’s roles and responsibilities at each gate

    4.5 Determine next steps and milestones for process adoption

    Outputs

    Documented outputs in the Project Gating Strategic Template

    Documented Project Gating Reference Document for all stakeholders

    Modernize Enterprise Storage

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}538|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Storage & Backup Optimization
    • Parent Category Link: /storage-and-backup-optimization
    • Current storage solutions are nearing end of life, performance or capacity limits.
    • Data continues to grow at an exponential rate, and management complexity is growing even faster. Some kinds of data, like unstructured data, are leading factors in the exponential growth of data.
    • Emerging storage technologies and storage software/automation are disrupting the market and redefining the role of disk arrays, including how storage aligns with people and process.
    • Storage infrastructure budgets are not satisfying the exponential growth of data.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Start with the data, not storage. Answer what is being stored and why before investigating the where and how of storage solutions.
    • Governance and archiving are not IT projects. These can have tremendous benefits for managing data growth but must involve the larger business.
    • More capacity is not a long-term solution. Data is growing faster than decreasing storage costs. Data and capacity mitigation strategies will help in more effective and efficient infrastructure utilization and cost reduction.

    Impact and Result

    • It’s about the data. Start with what is being supported and why. Decide on what and how data is stored before you decide on where. Let the needs of your workloads and governance requirements of your business drive your storage infrastructure decisions and the technologies you adopt.
    • Identify current and future capacity needs for current and future data drivers. Evaluating the ability of current infrastructure to meet these needs will help you discover necessary additions to meet these requirements.
    • Identify governance requirements and constraints that exist across the organization and are specific to workloads. Technology has to conform to these requirements and constraints, not the other way around.
    • Align people and process with technology changes. To effectively utilize the changes in storage, appropriate changes must be made to existing people and process.

    Modernize Enterprise Storage Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should modernize enterprise storage, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Build the case for storage modernization

    Develop the business case for modernizing storage and assess your existing infrastructure for meeting data needs.

    • Modernize Enterprise Storage – Phase 1: Build the Case for Storage Modernization
    • Modernize Enterprise Storage Workbook

    2. Develop your storage technology needs and goals

    Review data governance, explore emerging storage technologies, and identify current and future storage needs.

    • Modernize Enterprise Storage – Phase 2: Develop Your Storage Technology Needs and Goals
    • Evaluate Hyperconverged Infrastructure for Your Infrastructure Roadmap
    • Evaluate Software-Defined Storage Solutions for Your Infrastructure Roadmap
    • Evaluate All Flash in Primary Storage for Your Infrastructure Roadmap
    • Infrastructure Roadmap Technology Assessment Tool

    3. Develop and communicate the roadmap, TCO, and RFP

    Communicate the roadmap with people, process, and technology initiatives, develop an RFP, and conduct a TCO.

    • Modernize Enterprise Storage – Phase 3: Develop and Communicate the Roadmap and RFP
    • Modernize Enterprise Storage Communications Report
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Modernize Enterprise Storage

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Identify Business Case and Assess Current State

    The Purpose

    Identify a business case and need for storage modernization by assessing current and future storage needs.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A clear understanding of the business expectations and needs of storage infrastructure.

    Activities

    1.1 Identify current storage pain points.

    1.2 Discuss storage modernization drivers.

    1.3 Identify data growth drivers.

    1.4 Determine relative growth burden.

    Outputs

    Alignment of storage modernization with organizational pain points

    Desired outcomes of storage modernization

    An understanding of growth impact across drivers

    An understanding of capacity and expansion needs

    2 Review Governance and Emerging Technologies

    The Purpose

    Review existing data governance.

    Explore emerging technologies and trends in the storage space.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Review data governance objectives that must be met.

    Identify a shortlist of storage technologies and trends that may be of interest.

    Activities

    2.1 Shortlist interest in storage technologies.

    2.2 Prioritize shortlist of storage technologies.

    2.3 Identify solutions that meet data and governance needs.

    Outputs

    A starting point for research into new and emerging storage technologies

    Expressed interest in adopting storage technologies

    A list of storage solutions needed to deliver on future data and governance needs

    3 Identify Storage Needs and Develop Initiatives

    The Purpose

    Identify the people, process, and technology initiatives required to adopt new storage technologies.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Align your organizational people and process with new and disruptive technologies to best take advantage of what these new technologies have to offer.

    Activities

    3.1 Complete future storage structure planning tool.

    3.2 Identify storage modernization technology initiatives.

    3.3 Identify storage modernization people initiatives.

    3.4 Identify storage modernization process initiatives.

    Outputs

    A understanding of the future state of your storage infrastructure

    Technology initiatives needed to adopt storage structure

    People initiatives needed to adopt storage structure

    Process initiatives needed to adopt storage structure

    4 Build a Roadmap and RFP, Calculate TCO

    The Purpose

    Develop an executive communications report.

    Conduct a TCO analysis comparing on-premises and cloud storage solutions.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Communicate storage modernization goals and plans to stakeholders.

    Activities

    4.1 Prioritize storage modernization initiatives.

    4.2 Complete project timeline and build roadmap.

    4.3 Compare TCO of on-premises and cloud storage solutions.

    Outputs

    Alignment of people, process, and technology with storage adoption

    Communicate storage modernization goals and plans to stakeholders and executives

    Compare cost of on-premises and cloud storage alternatives

    Enterprise Application Selection and Implementation

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}29|cart{/j2store}
    • Related Products: {j2store}29|crosssells{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.0/10
    • member rating average dollars saved: $37,356
    • member rating average days saved: 34
    • Parent Category Name: Applications
    • Parent Category Link: /applications

    The challenge

    • Large scale implementations are prone to failure. This is probably also true in your company. Typically large endeavors like this overrun the budget, are late to deliver, or are abandoned altogether. It would be best if you manage your risks when starting such a new project.

    Our advice

    Insight

    • Large-scale software implementations continue to fail at very high rates. A recent report by McKinsey & Company estimates that 66% go over budget, 33% over time, and 17% delivered less value than expected. Most companies will survive a botched implementation, but 17% threatened the existence of the company involved.
    • With all the knowledge sharing that we have today with oodles of data at our disposal, we should expect IT-providers to have clear, standardized frameworks to handle these implementations. But projects that overrun by more than 200% still occur more often than you may think.
    • When you solicit a systems integrator (SI), you want to equip yourself to manage the SI and not be utterly dependent on their methodology.

    Impact and results 

    • You can assume proper accountability for the implementation and avoid over-reliance on the systems integrator.
    • Leverage the collective knowledge and advice of additional IT professionals
    • Review the pitfalls and lessons learned from failed integrations.
    • Manage risk at every stage.
    • Perform a self-assessment at various stages of the integration path.

    The roadmap

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    Executive Summary

    Determine the rations for your implementation

    See if a custom-of-the-shelf process optimization makes sense.

    • Storyboard: Govern and Manage an Enterprise Software Implementation (ppt)

    Prepare

    Determine the right (level of) governance for your implementation.

    • Large Software Implementation Maturity Assessment Tool (xls)
    • Project Success Measurement Tool (xls)
    • Risk Mitigation Plan Template (xls)

    Plan and analyze

    Prepare for the overall implementation journey and gather your requirements. Then conduct a stage-gate assessment of this phase.

    • Project Phases Entry and Exit Criteria Checklist Tool (xls)
    • Project Lessons Learned Document (doc)

    Design, build and deploy

    Conduct a stage-gate assessment after every step below.

    • Make exact designs of the software implementation and ensure that all stakeholders and the integrator completely understand.
    • Build the solution according to the requirements and designs.
    • Thoroughly test and evaluate that the implementation meets your business expectations. 
    • Then deploy

    Initiate your roadmap

    Review your dispositions to ensure they align with your goals. 

    • Build an Application Rationalization Framework – Phase 4: Initiate Your Roadmap (ppt)
    • Disposition Prioritization Tool (xls)

    Develop a Master Data Management Practice and Platform

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}401|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.3/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $27,416 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 15 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Data Management
    • Parent Category Link: /data-management
    • The volume of enterprise data is growing rapidly and comes from a wide variety of internal and external data sources (e.g. ERP, CRM). When data is located in different systems and applications, coupled with degradation and proliferation, this can lead to inaccurate, inconsistent, and redundant data being shared across departments within an organization.
    • Data kept in separate soiled sources can result in poor stakeholder decision making and inefficient business processes. Some common master data problems include:
      • The lack of a clean customer list results in poor customer service.
      • Hindering good analytics and business predictions, such as incorrect supply chain decisions when having duplicate product and vendor data between plants.
      • Creating cross-group consolidated reports from inconsistent local data that require too much manual effort and resources.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Everybody has master data (e.g. customer, product) but not master data problems (e.g. duplicate customers and products). MDM is complex in practice and requires investments in data governance, data architecture, and data strategy. Identifying business outcomes based on quality master data is essential before you pull the trigger on an MDM solution.

    Impact and Result

    This blueprint can help you:

    • Build a list of business-aligned data initiatives and capabilities that address master data problem and realize business strategic objectives.
    • Design a master data management practice based on the required business and data process.
    • Design a master data management platform based on MDM implementation style and prioritized technical capabilities.

    Develop a Master Data Management Practice and Platform Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Develop a Master Data Management Practice and Platform Deck – A clear blueprint that provides a step-by-step approach to aid in the development of your MDM practice and platform.

    This blueprint will help you achieve a single view of your most important data assets by following our two-phase methodology:

  • Build a vision for MDM
  • Build an MDM practice and platform
    • Develop a Master Data Management Practice and Platform – Phases 1-2

    2. Master Data Management Readiness Assessment Tool – A tool to help you make the decision to stop the MDM project now or to continue the path to MDM.

    This tool will help you determine if your organization has a master data problem and if an MDM project should be undertaken.

    • Master Data Management Readiness Assessment Tool

    3. Master Data Management Business Needs Assessment Tool – A tool to help you identify and document the various data sources in the organization and determine which data should be classified as master data.

    The tool will help you identify the sources of data within the business unit and use the typical properties of master data to determine which data should be classified as master data.

    • Master Data Management Business Needs Assessment Tool

    4. Master Data Management Business Case Presentation Template – A template to communicate MDM basics, benefits, and approaches to obtain business buy-in for the MDM project.

    The template will help you communicate your organization's specific pains surrounding poor management of master data and identify and communicate the benefits of effective MDM. Communicate Info-Tech's approach for creating an effective MDM practice and platform.

    • Master Data Management Business Case Presentation Template

    5. Master Data Management Project Charter Template – A template to centralize the critical information regarding to objectives, staffing, timeline, and expected outcome of the project.

    The project charter will help you document the project sponsor of the project. Identify purpose, goals, and objectives. Identify the project risks. Build a cross-functional project team and assign responsibilities. Define project team expectations and meeting frequency. Develop a timeline for the project with key milestones. Identify metrics for tracking success. Receive approval for the project.

    • Master Data Management Project Charter Template

    6. Master Data Management Architecture Design Template – An architecture design template to effectively document the movement of data aligned with the business process across the organization.

    This template will assist you:

  • Document the current state and achieve a common understanding of the business process and movement of data across the company.
  • Identify the source of master data and what other systems will contribute to the MDM system.
  • Document the target architectural state of the organization.
    • Master Data Management Architecture Design Template

    7. Master Data Management Practice Pattern Template – Pre-built practice patterns to effectively define the key services and outputs that must be delivered by establishing core capabilities, accountabilities, roles, and governance for the practice.

    The master data management practice pattern describes the core capabilities, accountabilities, processes, essential roles, and the elements that provide oversight or governance of the practice, all of which are required to deliver on high value services and deliverables or output for the organization.

    • Master Data Management Practice Pattern Template

    8. Master Data Management Platform Template – A pre-built platform template to illustrate the organization’s data environment with MDM and the value MDM brings to the organization.

    This template will assist you:

  • Establish an understanding of where MDM fits in an organization’s overall data environment.
  • Determine the technical capabilities that is required based on organization’s data needs for your MDM implementation.
    • Master Data Management Platform Template

    Infographic

    Workshop: Develop a Master Data Management Practice and Platform

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Develop a Vision for the MDM Project

    The Purpose

    Identification of MDM and why it is important.

    Differentiate between reference data and master data.

    Discuss and understand the key challenges and pains felt by the business and IT with respect to master data, and identify the opportunities MDM can provide to the business.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Identification of what is and is not master data.

    Understand the value of MDM and how it can help the organization better monetize its data.

    Knowledge of how master data can benefit both IT and the business.

    Activities

    1.1 Establish business context for master data management.

    1.2 Assess the value, benefits, challenges, and opportunities associated with MDM.

    1.3 Develop the vision, purpose, and scope of master data management for the business.

    1.4 Identify MDM enablers.

    1.5 Interview business stakeholders.

    Outputs

    High-level data requirements

    Identification of business priorities

    Project vision and scope

    2 Document the Current State

    The Purpose

    Recognize business drivers for MDM.

    Determine where master data lives and how this data moves within the organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Streamline business process, map the movement of data, and achieve a common understanding across the company.

    Identify the source of master data and what other systems will contribute to the MDM system.

    Activities

    2.1 Evaluate the risks and value of critical data.

    2.2 Map and understand the flow of data within the business.

    2.3 Identify master data sources and users.

    2.4 Document the current architectural state of the organization.

    Outputs

    Data flow diagram with identified master data sources and users

    Business data glossary

    Documented current data state.

    3 Document the Target State

    The Purpose

    Document the target data state of the organization surrounding MDM.

    Identify key initiatives and metrics.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Recognition of four MDM implementation styles.

    Identification of key initiatives and success metrics.

    Activities

    3.1 Document the target architectural state of the organization.

    3.2 Develop alignment of initiatives to strategies.

    3.3 Consolidate master data management initiatives and strategies.

    3.4 Develop a project timeline and define key success measures.

    Outputs

    Documented target state surrounding MDM.

    Data and master data management alignment and strategies

    4 Develop an MDM Practice and Platform

    The Purpose

    Get a clear picture of what the organization wants to get out of MDM.

    Identify master data management capabilities, accountabilities, process, roles, and governance.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Prioritized master data management capabilities, accountabilities, process, roles, and governance.

    Activities

    4.1 Identify master data management capabilities, roles, process, and governance.

    4.2 Build a master data management practice and platform.

    Outputs

    Master Data Management Practice and Platform

    Further reading

    Develop a Master Data Management Practice and Platform

    Are you sure you have a master data problem?

    Analyst Perspective

    The most crucial and shared data assets inside the firm must serve as the foundation for the data maturing process. This is commonly linked to your master data (such as customers, products, employees, and locations). Every organization has master data, but not every organization has a master data problem.

    Don't waste time or resources before determining the source of your master data problem. Master data issues are rooted in the business practices of your organization (such as mergers and acquisitions and federated multi-geographic operations). To address this issue, you will require a master data management (MDM) solution and the necessary architecture, governance, and support from very senior champions to ensure the long-term success of your MDM initiative. Approaching MDM with a clear blueprint that provides a step-by-step approach will aid in the development of your MDM practice and platform.

    Ruyi Sun

    Ruyi Sun
    Research Specialist
    Data & Analytics Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Rajesh Parab

    Rajesh Parab
    Research Director
    Data & Analytics Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    Common Obstacles

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    Your organization is experiencing data challenges, including:

    • Too much data volume, variety, and velocity, from more and more sources.
    • Duplicate and disorganized data across multiple systems and applications.
    • Master data is pervasive throughout the business and is often created and captured in highly disparate sources that often are not easily shared across business units and applications.

    MDM is useful in situations such as a business undergoing a merger or acquisition, where a unique set of master data needs to be created to act as a single source of truth. However, having a unified view of the definitions and systems of record for the most critical data in your organization can be difficult to achieve. An organization might experience some pain points:

    • Failure to identify master data problem and organization’s data needs.
    • Conflicting viewpoints and definitions of data assets across business units.
    • Recognize common business operating models or strategies with master data problems.
    • Identify the organization’s problem and needs out of its master data and align to strategic business needs.
    • Define the architecture, governance, and support.
    • Create a practice and platform for the organization’s MDM program.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Everybody has master data (e.g. customer, product) but not a master data problem (e.g. duplicate customers and products). MDM is complex in practice and requires investments in data governance, data architecture, and data strategy. Identifying business outcomes based on quality master data is essential before you pull the trigger on an MDM solution.

    What is master data and master data management?

    • Master data domains include the most important data assets of an organization. For this data to be used across an enterprise in consistent and value-added ways, the data must be properly managed. Some common master data entities include customer, product, and employees.
    • Master data management (MDM) is the control over master data values to enable consistent, shared, contextual use across systems, of the most accurate, timely, and relevant version of truth about essential business entities (DAMA DMBOK).
    • The fundamental objective of MDM is to enable the business to see one view of critical data elements across the organization.
    • MDM systems will detect and declare relationships between data, resolve duplicate records, and make data available to the people, processes, and applications that need it. The end goal of an MDM implementation is to make sure your investment in MDM technology delivers the promised business results. By supplementing the technology with rules, guidelines, and standards around enterprise data you will ensure data continues to be synchronized across data sources on an ongoing basis.

    The image contains a screenshot of Info-Tech's Data Management Framework.

    Info-Tech’s Data Management Framework Adapted from DAMA-DMBOK and Advanced Knowledge Innovations Global Solutions. See Create a Data Management Roadmap blueprint for more information.

    Why manage master data?

    Master data drives practical insights that arise from key aspects of the business.

    Customer Intimacy

    Innovation Leadership

    Risk Management

    Operational Excellence

    Improve marketing and the customer experience by using the right data from the system of record to analyze complete customer views of transactions, sentiments, and interactions.

    Gain insights on your products, services, usage trends, industry directions, and competitor results, and use these data artifacts to support decisions on innovations, new products, services, and pricing.

    Maintain more transparent and accurate records and ensure that appropriate rules are followed to support audit, compliance, regulatory, and legal requirements. Monitor data usage to avoid fraud.

    Make sure the right solution is delivered rapidly and consistently to the right parties for the right price and cost structure. Automate processes by using the right data to drive process improvements.

    85% of customers expect consistent interactions across departments (Salesforce, 2022).

    Top-decile economic performers are 20% more likely to have a common source of data that serves as the single source of truth across the organization compared to their peers (McKinsey & Company, 2021).

    Only 6% of board members believe they are effective in managing risk (McKinsey & Company, 2018).

    32% of sales and marketing teams consider data inconsistency across platforms as their biggest challenge (Dun & Bradstreet, 2022).

    Your Challenge

    Modern organizations have unprecedented data challenges.

    • The volume of enterprise data is growing rapidly and comes from a wide variety of internal and external data sources (e.g. ERP, CRM). When data is located in different systems and applications, coupled with degradation and proliferation, this can lead to inaccurate, inconsistent, and redundant data being shared across departments within an organization.
    • For example, customer information may not be identical in the customer service system, shipping system, and marketing management platform because of manual errors or different name usage (e.g. GE or General Electric) when input by different business units.
    • Data kept in separate soiled sources can also result in poor stakeholder decision making and inefficient business processes. Some issues include:
      • The lack of clean customer list results in poor customer service.
      • Hindering good analytics and business predictions, such as incorrect supply chain decision when having duplicate product and vendor data between plants.
      • Creating cross-group consolidated reports from duplicate and inconsistent local data requires too much manual effort and resources.

    On average, 25 different data sources are used for generating customer insights and engagement.

    On average, 16 different technology applications are used to leverage customer data.

    Source: Deloitte Digital, 2020

    Common Obstacles

    Finding a single source of truth throughout the organization can be difficult.

    Changes in business process often come with challenges for CIOs and IT leaders. From an IT perspective, there are several common business operating models that can result in multiple sets of master data being created and held in various locations. Some examples could be:

    • Integrate systems following corporate mergers and acquisitions
    • Enterprise with multi-product line
    • Multinational company or multi-geographic operations with various ERP systems
    • Digital transformation projects such as omnichannel

    In such situations, implementing an MDM solution helps achieve harmonization and synchronization of master data and provide a single, reliable, and precise view of the organization. However, MDM is a complex system that requires more than just a technical solution. An organization might experience the following pain points:

    • Failure to identify master data problem and organization’s data needs.
    • Conflicting viewpoints and definitions of data assets that should reside in MDM across business units.

    Building a successful MDM initiative can be a large undertaking that takes some preparation before starting. Understanding the fundamental roles that data governance, data architecture, and data strategy play in MDM is essential before the implementation.

    “Only 3 in 10 of respondents are completely confident in their company's ability to deliver a consistent omnichannel experience.”

    Source: Dun & Bradstreet, 2022

    The image contains an Info-Tech Thought Model of the Develop a Master Data Management Practice & Platform.

    Insight summary

    Overarching insight

    Everybody has master data (e.g. customer, product) but not a master data problem (e.g. duplicate customers and products). MDM is complex in practice and requires investments in data governance, data architecture, and data strategy. Figuring out what the organization needs out of its master data is essential before you pull the trigger on an MDM solution.

    Phase 1 insight

    A master data management solution will assist you in solving master data challenges if your organization is large or complex, such as a multinational corporation or a company with multiple product lines, with frequent mergers and acquisitions, or adopting a digital transformation strategy such as omnichannel.

    Organizations often have trouble getting started because of the difficulty of agreeing on the definition of master data within the enterprise. Reference data is an easy place to find that common ground.

    While the organization may have data that fits into more than one master data domain, it does not necessarily need to be mastered. Determine what master data entities your organization needs.

    Although it is easy to get distracted by the technical aspects of the MDM project – such as extraction and consolidation rules – the true goal of MDM is to make sure that the consumers of master data (such as business units, sales) have access to consistent, relevant, and trusted shared data.

    Phase 2 insight

    An organization with activities such as mergers and acquisitions or multi-ERP systems poses a significant master data challenge. Prioritize your master data practice based on your organization’s ability to locate and maintain a single source of master data.

    Leverage modern capabilities such as artificial intelligence or machine learning to support large and complex MDM deployments.

    Blueprint Overview

    1. Build a Vision for MDM

    2. Build an MDM Practice and Platform

    Phase Steps

    1. Assess Your Master Data Problem
    2. Identify Your Master Data Domains
    3. Create a Strategic Vision
    1. Document Your Organization’s Current Data State
    2. Document Your Organization’s Target Data State
    3. Formulate an Actionable MDM Practice and Platform

    Phase Participants

    CIO, CDO, or IT Executive

    Head of the Information Management Practice

    Business Domain Representatives

    Enterprise Architecture Domain Architects

    Information Management MDM Experts

    Data Stewards or Data Owners

    Phase Outcomes

    This step identifies the essential concepts around MDM, including its definitions, your readiness, and prioritized master data domains. This will ensure the MDM initiatives are aligned to business goals and objectives.

    To begin addressing the MDM project, you must understand your current and target data state in terms of data architecture and data governance surrounding your MDM strategy. With all these considerations in mind, design your organizational MDM practice and platform.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    1. MDM Readiness Assessment ToolThe image contains a screenshot of the MDM Readiness Assessment Tool. 2. Business Needs Assessment Tool The image contains a screenshot of the Business Needs Assessment Tool.
    3. Business Case Presentation Template The image contains a screenshot of the Business Case Presentation Template. 4. Project Charter Template The image contains a screenshot of the Project Charter Template.
    5. Architecture Design Template The image contains a screenshot of the Architecture Design Template.

    Key deliverable:

    6. MDM Practice Pattern Template

    7. MDM Platform Template

    Define the intentional relationships between the business and the master data through a well-thought-out master data platform and practice.

    The image contains a screenshot to demonstrate the intentional relationships between the business and the master data.

    Measure the value of this blueprint

    Refine the metrics for the overall Master Data Management Practice and Platform.

    In phase 1 of this blueprint, we will help you establish the business context and master data needs.

    In phase 2, we will help you document the current and target state of your organization and develop a practice and platform so that master data is well managed to deliver on those defined metrics.

    Sample Metrics

    Method of Calculation

    Master Data Sharing Availability and Utilization

    # of Business Lines That Use Master Data

    Master Data Sharing Volume

    # of Master Entities

    # of Key Elements, e.g. # of Customers With Many Addresses

    Master Data Quality and Compliance

    # of Duplicate Master Data Records

    Identified Sources That Contribute to Master Data Quality Issues

    # of Master Data Quality Issues Discovered or Resolved

    # of Non-Compliance Issues

    Master Data Standardization/Governance

    # of Definitions for Each Master Entity

    # of Roles (e.g. Data Stewards) Defined and Created

    Trust and Satisfaction

    Trust Indicator, e.g. Confidence Indicator of Golden Record

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    “Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

    Workshop

    “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

    Consulting

    “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Phase 1 Phase 2

    Call #1: Identify master data problem and assess your organizational readiness for MDM.

    Call #2: Define master data domains and priorities.

    Call #3: Determine business requirements for MDM.

    Call #4: Develop a strategic vision for the MDM project.

    Call #5: Map and understand the flow of data within the business.

    Call #6: Document current architectural state.

    Call #7: Discover the MDM implementation styles of MDM and document target architectural state.

    Call #8: Create MDM data practice and platform.

    Call #9: Summarize results and plan next steps.

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is 8 to 12 calls over the course of 4 to 6 months.

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5

    Develop a Vision for the MDM Project

    Document the
    Current State

    Document the
    Target State

    Develop a MDM Practice and Platform

    Next Steps and
    Wrap-Up (offsite)

    Activities

    • Establish business context for master data management.
    • Assess the readiness, value, benefits, challenges, and opportunities associated with MDM.
    • Develop the vision, purpose, and scope of master data management for the business.
    • Identify master data management enablers.
    • Interview business stakeholders.
    • Evaluate the risks and value of critical data.
    • Map and understand the flow of data within the business.
    • Identify master data sources and users.
    • Document the current architectural state of the organization
    • Document the target data state of the organization.
    • Develop alignment of initiatives to strategies.
    • Consolidate master data management initiatives and strategies.
    • Develop a project timeline and define key success measures.
    • Identify master data management capabilities, roles, process, and governance.
    • Build a master data management practice and platform.
    • Complete in-progress deliverables from previous four days.
    • Set up review time for workshop deliverables and to discuss next steps.

    Deliverables

    1. High-level data requirements
    2. Identification of business priorities
    3. Project vision and scope
    1. Data flow diagram with identified master data sources and users
    2. Business data glossary
    3. Documented current data state
    1. Documented target state surrounding MDM
    2. Data and master data management alignment and strategies
    1. Master Data Management Practice and Platform
    1. Master Data Management Strategy for continued success

    Phase 1: Build a Vision for MDM

    Develop a Master Data Management Practice and Platform

    Step 1.1

    Assess Your Master Data Problem

    Objectives

    1. Build a solid foundation of knowledge surrounding MDM.

    2. Recognize MDM problems that the organization faces in the areas of mergers and acquisitions, omnichannel, multi-product line, and multi-ERP setups.

    This step involves the following participants:

    CIO, CDO, or IT Executive

    Head of Information Management

    Outcomes of this step

    An understanding of master data, MDM, and the prerequisites necessary to create an MDM program.

    Determine if there is a need for MDM in the organization.

    Understand your data – it’s not all transactional

    Info-Tech analyzes the value of data through the lenses of its four distinct classes: Master, Transactional, Operational, and Reference.

    Master

    Transactional

    Operational

    Reference

    • Addresses critical business entities that fall into four broad groupings: party (customers, suppliers); product (products, policies); location (physical spaces and segmentations); and financial (contracts, transactions).
    • This data is typically critical to the organization, less volatile, and more complex in nature; it contains many data elements and is used across systems.
    • Transactional data refers to data generated when dealing with external parties, such as clients and suppliers.
    • Transactional data may be needed on a per-use basis or through several activities.
    • The data can also be accessed in real-time if needed.
    • Operational data refers to data that is used to support internal business activities, processes, or workflows.
    • This data is generated during a one-time activity or multiple times through a data hub or orchestration layer.
    • Depending on the need for speed, there can be a real-time aspect to the situation.
    • Examples: scheduling service data or performance data.
    • Reference data refers to simple lists of data that are typically static and help categorize other data using code tables.
    • Examples: list of countries or states, postal codes, general ledger chart of accounts, currencies, or product code.

    Recognize the fundamental prerequisites for MDM before diving into more specific readiness requirements

    Organizational buy-in

    • Ensure there is someone actively invested and involved in the progress of the project. Having senior management support, especially in the form of an executive sponsor or champion, is necessary to approve MDM budgets and resourcing.
    • MDM changes business processes and practices that affect many departments, groups, and people – this type of change may be disruptive so sponsorship from the top ensures your project will keep moving forward even during difficulties.
    • Consider developing a cross-functional master data team involving stakeholders from management, IT, and the business units. This group can ensure that the MDM initiative is aligned with and supports larger organizational needs and everyone understands their role.

    Understanding the existing data environment

    • Knowing the state of an organization’s data architecture, and which data sources are linked to critical business processes, is essential before starting an MDM project.
    • Identify the areas of data pain within your organization and establish the root cause. Determine what impact this is having on the business.

    Before starting to look at technology solutions, make sure you have organizational buy-in and an understanding of the existing data environment. These two prerequisites are the foundation for MDM success.

    Master data management provides opportunities to use data for analytical and operational purposes with greater accuracy

    MDM can be approached in two ways: analytical and operational.

    Think of it in the context of your own organization:

    • How will MDM improve the ability for accurate data to be shared across business processes (Operational MDM)?
    • How will MDM improve the quality of reports for management reporting and executive decision making (Analytical MDM)?

    An investment in MDM will improve the opportunities for using the organization’s most valuable data assets, including opportunities like:

    • Data is more easily shared across the organization’s environment with greater accuracy and trust.
    • Multiple instances of the same data are consistent.
    • MDM enables the ability to find the right data more quickly.

    9.5% of revenue was at risk when bad experiences were offered to customers.

    Source: Qualtrics XM Institute, 2022

    Master data management drives better customer experience

    85% In a survey of nearly 17,000 consumers and business buyers, 85% of customers expect consistent interactions across departments.

    Source: Salesforce, 2022

    Yet, 60% of customer say it generally feels like sales, service, and marketing teams do not share information.

    Source: Salesforce, 2022

    What is a business without the customer? Positive customer service experience drives customer retention, satisfaction, and revenue growth, and ultimately, determines the success of the organization. Effective MDM can improve customer experiences by providing consistent interactions and the ability to meet customer expectations.

    61% of customers say they would switch to a competitor after just one bad customer service experience.

    Source: Zendesk, 2022

    Common business operating models or strategies with master data problems

    Mergers and acquisitions (M&A)

    M&A involves activities related to the consolidation of two companies. From IT’s perspective, whether the organization maintains different IT systems and applications in parallel or undergoes data integration process, it is common to have multiple instances of the same customer or product entity across different systems between companies, leading to incomplete, duplicate, and conflicting data sets. The organization may face challenges in both operational and analytical aspects. For many, the objective is to create a list of master data to have a single view of the organization.

    Multiple-instance ERP or multinational organizations

    Multiple-instance ERP solutions are commonly used by businesses that operate globally to accommodate each country’s needs or financial systems (Brightwork Research). With MDM, having a single source of truth could be a great advantage in certain business units to collaborate globally, such as sharing inventory coding systems to allow common identity and productive resource allocation and shared customer information for analytical purposes.

    Common business operating models or strategies with master data problems (cont.)

    Multiple product lines of business

    An example for firms that sells multiple product lines could be Nike’s multiple product lines including footwear, clothing, and equipment. Keeping track of many product lines is a constant challenge for organizations in terms of inventory management, vendor database, and a tracking system. The ability to track and maintain your product data accurately and consistently is crucial for a successful supply chain (whether in a warehouse, distribution center, or retail office), which leads to improved customer satisfaction and increased sales.

    Info-Tech Insight
    A master data management solution will assist you in solving master data challenges if your organization is large or complex such as a multinational corporation or a company with multiple product lines, frequent mergers and acquisitions, or adopting a digital transformation strategy such as omnichannel.

    Omni-channel

    In e-commerce and retail industry, omnichannel means a business strategy that offers seamless shopping experiences across all channels, such as in-store, mobile, and online (Oracle). This also means the company needs to provide consistent information on orders, inventory, pricing, and promotions to customers and keep the customer records up to date. The challenges of omnichannel include having to synchronize data across channels and systems such as ERP, CRM, and social media. MDM becomes a solution for the success of an omnichannel strategy that refers to the same source of truth across business functions and channels.

    Assess business model using Info-Tech’s MDM Readiness Assessment Tool

    30 Minutes

    • The MDM Readiness Assessment Tool will help you make the decision to stop the MDM project now or to continue on the path to MDM.
    • Not all organizations need MDM. Don’t waste precious IT time and resources if your organization does not have a master data problem.

    The image contains screenshots of the MDM Readiness Assessment Tool.

    Download the MDM Readiness Assessment Tool

    Input Output
    • List of key MDM decision points
    • MDM readiness
    Materials Participants
    • Master Data Management Readiness Assessment Tool
    • Head of Information Management
    • CIO, CDO, or IT Executive

    Step 1.2

    Identify the Master Data Domains

    Objectives

    Determine which data domain contains the most critical master data in the organization for an MDM strategy.

    This step involves the following participants:

    Business Domain Representatives

    Data Stewards or Data Owners

    Information Management Team

    Outcomes of this step

    Determine the ideal data domain target for the organization based on where the business is experiencing the largest pains related to master data and where it will see the most benefit from MDM.

    Reference data makes tackling master data easier

    Reference data serves as a great starting place for an MDM project.

    • Reference data is the simple lists of data that are typically static and help categorize other data using code tables. Examples include lists of countries or states, postal codes, general ledger charts of accounts, currencies, or product codes.
    • Loading information into the warehouse or an MDM hub usually requires reconciling reference data from multiple sources. By getting reference data in order first, MDM will be easier to implement.
    • Reference data also requires a relatively small investment with good returns so the value of the project can easily be demonstrated to stakeholders.
    • One example of how reference data makes master data easier to tackle is a master list of an organization’s customers that needs an attribute of an address. By maintaining a list of postal codes or cities as reference data, this is made much easier to manage than simply allowing free text.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Organizations often have trouble getting started because of the difficulty of agreeing on the definition of master data within the enterprise. Reference data is an easy place to find that common ground.

    There are several key considerations when defining which data is master data in the organization

    A successful implementation of MDM depends on the careful selection of the data element to be mastered. As departments often have different interests, establishing a standard set of data elements can lead to a lot of discussion. When selecting what data should be considered master data, consider the following:

    • Complexity. As the number of elements in a set increases, the likelihood that the data is master data also increases.
    • Volatility. Master data tends to be less volatile. The more volatile data is, the more likely it is transactional data.
    • Risk. The more likely data may have a risk associated with it, the more likely it should be managed with MDM.
    • Value. The more valuable a data set is to the organization, the greater the chance it is master data.
    • Sharing. If the data set is used in multiple systems, it likely should be managed with an MDM system.

    Begin by documenting the existing data sources within the organization.

    Use Info-Tech’s Master Data Management Business Needs Assessment Tool to determine master data sources.

    Info-Tech Insight

    While the organization may have data that fits into more than one master data domain, it does not necessarily need to be mastered. Determine what master data entities your organization needs.

    Master data also fall into these four areas

    More perspectives to consider and define which data is your master data.

    Internally Created Entities

    Externally Created Entities

    Large Non-Recurring Transactions

    Categories/Relationships/ Hierarchies/Aggregational Patterns

    • Business objects and concepts at the core of organizational activities that are created and maintained only by this organization.
    • Examples: customers, suppliers, products, projects
    • Business objects and concepts at the core of organizational activities that are created outside of this organization, but it keeps its own master list of these entities with additional attributions.
    • Examples: equipment, materials, industry classifications
    • Factual records reflecting the organization’s activities.
    • Examples: large purchases, large sales, measuring equipment data, student academic performance
    • Lateral and hierarchical relationships across master entities.
    • Organization-wide standards for data / information organization and aggregation.
    • Examples: classifications of equipment and materials, legal relationships across legal entities, sales regions or sub-regions

    Master data types can be divided into four main domains

    Parties

    • Data about individuals, organizations, and the roles they play in business relationships.
    • In the commercial world this means customer, employee, vendor, partner, and competitor data.

    Product

    • Can focus on organization's internal products or services or the entire industry, including competitor products and services.
    • May include information about part/ingredient usage, versions, patch fixes, pricing, and bundles.

    Financial

    • Data about business units, cost centers, profit centers, general ledger accounts, budgets, projections, and projects
    • Typically, ERP systems serve as the central hub for this.

    Locations

    • Often seen as the domain that encompasses other domains. Typically includes geopolitical data such as sales territories.
    • Provides ability to track and share reference information about different geographies and create hierarchical relationships based on information.

    Single Domain vs. Multi-Domain

    • By focusing on a single master data domain, organizations can start with smaller, more manageable steps, rather than trying to tackle everything at once.
    • MDM solutions can be domain-specific or be designed to support multiple domains.
    • Multi-domain MDM is a solution that manages multiple types of master data in one repository. By implementing multi-domain from the beginning, an organization is better able to support growth across all dimensions and business units.

    Use Info-Tech’s Master Data Management Business Needs Assessment Tool to determine master data priorities

    2 hours

    Use the Master Data Management Business Needs Assessment Tool to assist you in determining the master data domains present in your organization and the suggested domain(s) for your MDM solution.

    The image contains screenshots of the Master Data Management Business Needs Assessment Tool.

    Download the MDM Business Needs Assessment Tool

    Input Output
    • Current data sources within the organization
    • Business requirements of master data
    • Prioritized list of master data domains
    • Project scope
    Materials Participants
    • Master Data Management Business Needs Assessment Tool
    • Data Stewards or Data Custodians
    • Information Management Team

    Step 1.3

    Create a Strategic Vision for Your MDM Program

    Objectives

    1. Understand the true goal of MDM – ensuring that the needs of the master data users in the organization are fulfilled.

    2. Create a plan to obtain organizational buy-in for the MDM initiative.

    3. Organize and officialize your project by documenting key metrics, responsibilities, and goals for MDM.

    This step involves the following participants:

    CEO, CDO, or CIO

    Business Domain Representatives

    Information Management Team

    Outcomes of this step

    Obtain business buy-in and direction for the MDM initiative.

    Create the critical foundation plans that will guide you in evaluating, planning, and implementing your immediate and long-term MDM goals.

    MDM is not just IT’s responsibility

    Make sure the whole organization is involved throughout the project.

    • Master data is created for the organization as a whole, so get business input to ensure IT decisions fit with corporate goals and objectives.
    • The ownership of master data is the responsibility of the business. IT is responsible for the MDM project’s technology, support, platforms, and infrastructure; however, the ownership of business rules and standards reside with the business.
    • MDM requires IT and the business to form a partnership. While IT is responsible for the technical component, the business will be key in identifying master data.
    • MDM belongs to the entire organization – not a specific department – and should be created with the needs of the whole organization in mind. As such, MDM needs to be aligned with company’s overall data strategy. Data strategy planning involves identifying and translating business objectives and capability goals into strategies for improving data usage by the business and enhancing the capabilities of MDM.

    Keep the priorities of the users of master data at the forefront of your MDM initiative.

    • To fully satisfy the needs of the users of master data, you have to know how the data is consumed. Information managers and architects must work with business teams to determine how organizational objectives are achieved by using master data.
    • Steps to understanding the users of master data and their needs:
    1. Identify and document the users of master data – some examples include business units such as marketing, sales, and innovation teams.
    2. Interview those identified to understand how their strategic goals can be enabled by MDM. Determine their needs and expectations.
    3. Determine how changes to the master data management strategy will bring about improvements to information sharing and increase the value of this critical asset.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Although it is easy to get distracted by the technical aspects of the MDM project – such as extraction and consolidation rules – the true goal of MDM is to make sure that the consumers of master data (such as business units, sales reps) have access to consistent, relevant, and trusted shared data.

    Interview business stakeholders to understand how IT’s implementation of MDM will enable better business decisions

    1 hours

    Instructions

    1. Identify which members of the business you would like to interview to gather an understanding of their current data issues and desired data usage. (Recommendation: Gather a diverse set of individuals to help build a broader and more holistic knowledge of data consumption wants or requirements.)
    2. Prepare your interview questions.
    3. Interview the identified members of the business.
    4. Debrief and document results.

    Tactical Tips

    • Include members of your team to help heighten their knowledge of the business.
    • Identify a team member to operate as the formal scribe.
    • Keep the discussion as free flowing as possible; it will likely enable the business to share more. Don’t get defensive – one of the goals of the interviews is to open communication lines and identify opportunities for change, not create tension between IT and the business.
    Input Output
    • Current master data pain points and issues
    • Desired master data usage
    • Prioritized list of master data management enablers
    • Understanding of organizational strategic plan
    Materials Participants
    • Interview questions
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Information Management Team
    • Business Line Representatives

    Info-Tech Insight

    Prevent the interviews from being just a venue for the business to complain about data by opening the discussion of having them share current concerns and then focus the second half on what they would like to do with data and how they see master data assets supporting their strategic plans.

    Ensure buy-in for the MDM project by aligning the MDM vision and the drivers of the organization

    MDM exists to enable the success of the organization as a whole, not just as a technology venture. To be successful in the MDM initiative, IT must understand how MDM will help the critical aspects of the business. Likewise, the business must understand why it is important to them to ensure long-term support of the project.

    The image contains a screenshot example of the text above.

    “If an organization only wants to look at MDM as a tech project, it will likely be a failure. It takes a very strong business and IT partnership to make it happen.”

    – Julie Hunt, Software Industry Analyst, Hub Designs Magazine

    Use Info-Tech’s Master Data Management Business Case Presentation Template to help secure business buy-in

    1-2 hours

    The image contains screenshots of the Master Data Management Business Case Presentation Template.

    Objectives

    • This presentation should be used to help obtain momentum for the ongoing master data management initiative and continued IT- business collaboration.
    • Master data management and the state of processes around data can be a sensitive business topic. To overcome issues of resistance from the operational or strategic levels, create a well-crafted business case.
    Input Output
    • Business requirements
    • Goals of MDM
    • Pain points of inadequate MDM
    • Awareness built for MDM project
    • Target data domains
    • Project scope
    Materials Participants
    • Master Data Management Business Case Presentation Template
    • Data Stewards or Data Custodians
    • CEO, CDO, or CIO
    • Information Management Team

    Download the MDM Business Case Presentation Template

    Use Info-Tech’s project charter to support your team in organizing their master data management plans

    Use this master document to centralize the critical information regarding the objectives, staffing, timeline, budget, and expected outcome of the project.

    1. MDM Vision and Mission

    Overview

    Define the value proposition behind addressing master data strategies and developing the organization's master data management practice.

    Consider

    Why is this project critical for the business?

    Why should this project be done now, instead of delayed further down the road?

    2. Goals or Objectives

    Overview

    Your goals and objectives should be practical and measurable. Goals and objectives should be mapped back to the reasons for MDM that we identified in the Executive Brief.

    Example Objectives

    Align the organization’s IT and business capabilities in MDM to the requirements of the organization’s business processes and the data that supports it.

    3. Expected Outcomes

    Overview

    Master data management as a concept can change based on the organization and with definitions and expectations varying heavily for individuals. Ensure alignment at the outset of the project by outlining and attaining agreement on the expectations and expected outcomes (deliverables) of the project.

    Recommended Outcomes

    Outline of an action plan

    Documented data strategies

    4. Outline of Action Plan

    Overview

    Document the plans for your project in the associated sections of the project charter to align with the outcomes and deliverables associated with the project. Use the sample material in the charter and the “Develop Your Timeline for the MDM Project” section to support developing your project plans.

    Recommended Project Scope

    Align master data MDM plan with the business.

    Document current and future architectural state of MDM.

    Download the MDM Project Charter Template

    5. Identify the Resourcing Requirements

    Overview

    Create a project team that has representation of both IT and the business (this will help improve alignment and downstream implementation planning).

    Business Roles to Engage

    Data owners (for subject area data)

    Data stewards who are custodians of business data (related to subject areas evaluated)

    Data scientists or other power users who are heavy consumers of data

    IT Roles to Engage

    Data architect(s)

    Any data management professionals who are involved in modeling data, managing data assets, or supporting the systems in which the data resides.

    Database administrators or data warehousing architects with a deep knowledge of data operations.

    Individuals responsible for data governance.

    Phase 2: Build the MDM Practice and Platform

    Develop a Master Data Management Practice and Platform

    Step 2.1

    Document the Current Data State

    Objectives

    1. Understand roles that data strategy, data governance, and data architecture play in MDM.

    2. Document the organization’s current data state for MDM.

    This step involves the following participants:

    Data Stewards or Data Custodians

    Data or Enterprise Architect

    Information Management Team

    Outcomes of this step

    Document the organization’s current data state, understanding the business processes and movement of data across the company.

    Effective data governance will create the necessary roles and rules within the organization to support MDM

    • A major success factor for MDM falls under data governance. If you don’t establish data governance early on, be prepared to face major obstacles throughout your project. Governance includes data definitions, data standards, access rights, and quality rules and ensures that MDM continues to offer value.
    • Data governance involves an organizational committee or structure that defines the rules of how data is used and managed – rules around its quality, processes to remediate data errors, data sharing, managing data changes, and compliance with internal and external regulations.
    • What is required for governance of master data? Defined roles, including data stewards and data owners, that will be responsible for creating the definitions relevant to master data assets.

    The image contains a screenshot of the Data Governance Key to Data Enablement.

    For more information, see Info-Tech Research Group’s Establish Data Governance blueprint.

    Ensure MDM success by defining roles that represent the essential high-level aspects of MDM

    Regardless of the maturity of the organization or the type of MDM project being undertaken, all three representatives must be present and independent. Effective communication between them is also necessary.

    Technology Representative

    Governance Representative

    Business Representative

    Role ensures:

    • MDM technology requirements are defined.
    • MDM support is provided.
    • Infrastructure to support MDM is present.

    Role ensures:

    • MDM roles and responsibilities are clearly defined.
    • MDM standards are adhered to.

    Role ensures:

    • MDM business requirements are defined.
    • MDM business matching rules are defined.

    The following roles need to be created and maintained for effective MDM:

    Data Owners are accountable for:

    • Data created and consumed.
    • Ensuring adequate data risk management is in place.

    Data Stewards are responsible for:

    • The daily and routine care of all aspects of data systems.
    • Supporting the user community.
    • Collecting, collating, and evaluating issues and problems with data.
    • Managing standard business definitions and metadata for critical data elements.

    Another crucial aspect of implementing MDM governance is defining match rules for master data

    • Matching, merging, and linking data from multiple systems about the same item, person, group, etc. attempts to remove redundancy, improve data quality, and provide information that is more comprehensive.
    • Matching is performed by applying inference rules. Data cleansing tools and MDM applications often include matching engines used to match data.
      • Engines are dependent on clearly defined matching rules, including the acceptability of matches at different confidence levels.
    • Despite best efforts, match decisions sometimes prove to be incorrect. It is essential to maintain the history of matches so that matches can be undone when they are discovered to be incorrect.
    • Artificial intelligence (AI) for match and merge is also an option, where the AI engine can automatically identify duplicate master data records to create a golden record.

    Match-Merge Rules vs. Match-Link Rules

    Match-Merge Rules

    • Match records and merge the data from these records into a single, unified, reconciled, and comprehensive record. If rules apply across data sources, create a single unique and comprehensive record in each database.
    • Complex due to the need to identify so many possible circumstances, with different levels of confidence and trust placed on data values in different fields from different sources.
    • Challenges include the operational complexity of reconciling the data and the cost of reversing the operation if there is a false merge.

    Match-Link Rules

    • Identify and cross-reference records that appear to relate to a master record without updating the content of the cross-referenced record.
    • Easier to implement and much easier to reverse.
    • Simple operation; acts on the cross-reference table and not the individual fields of the merged master data record, even though it may be more difficult to present comprehensive information from multiple records.

    Data architecture will assist in producing an effective data integration model for the technology underlying MDM

    Data quality is directly impacted by architecture.

    • With an MDM architecture, access, replication, and flow of data are controlled, which increases data quality and consistency.
    • Without an MDM architecture, master data occurs in application silos. This can cause redundant and inconsistent data.

    Before designing the MDM architecture, consider:

    • How the business is going to use the master data.
    • Architectural style (this is often dependent on the existing IT architecture, but generally, organizations starting with MDM find a hub architecture easiest to work with).
    • Where master data is entered, updated, and stored.
    • Whether transactions should be processed as batch or real-time.
    • What systems will contribute to the MDM system.
    • Implementation style. This will help ensure the necessary applications have access to the master data.

    “Having an architectural oversight and reference model is a very important step before implementing the MDM solutions.”

    – Selwyn Samuel, Director of Enterprise Architecture

    Document the organization’s data architecture to generate an accurate picture of the current data state

    2-3 hours

    Populate the template with your current organization's data components and the business flow that forms the architecture.

    Think about the source of master data and what other systems will contribute to the MDM system.

    The image contains a screenshot of the MDM Architecture Design Template.

    Input Output
    • Business process streamline
    • Current data state
    Materials Participants
    • MDM Architecture Design Template ArchiMate file
    • Enterprise Architect
    • Data Architect

    Download the MDM Architecture Design Template ArchiMate file

    Step 2.2

    Document the Target Data State

    Objectives

    1. Understand four implementation styles for MDM deployments.

    2. Document target MDM implementation systems.

    This step involves the following participants:

    Data Stewards or Data Custodians

    Data or Enterprise Architect

    Information Management Team

    Outcomes of this step

    Document the organization’s target architectural state surrounding MDM, identifying the specific MDM implementation style.

    How the organization’s data flows through IT systems is a convenient way to define your MDM state

    Understanding the data sources present in the organization and how the business organizes and uses this data is critical to implementing a successful MDM strategy.

    Operational MDM

    • As you manage data in an operational MDM system, the data gets integrated back into the systems that were the source of the data in the first place. The “best records” are created from a combination of data elements from systems that create relevant data (e.g. billing system, call center, reservation system) and then the data is sent back to the systems to update it to the best record. This includes both batch and real-time processing data.

    Analytical MDM

    • Generates “best records” the same way that operational MDM does. However, the data doesn’t go back to the systems that generated the data but rather to a repository for analytics, decision management, or reporting system purposes.

    Discovery of master data is the same for both approaches, but the end use is very different.

    The approaches are often combined by technologically mature organizations, but analytical MDM is generally more expensive due to increased complexity.

    Central to an MDM program is the implementation of an architectural framework

    Info-Tech Research Group’s Reference MDM Architecture uses a top-down approach.

    A top-down approach shows the interdependent relationship between layers – one layer of functionality uses services provided by the layers below, and in turn, provides services to the layers above.

    The image contains a screenshot of the Architectural Framework.

    Info-Tech Research Group’s Reference MDM Architecture can meet the unique needs of different organizations

    The image contains a screenshot of Info-Tech Research Group's Reference MDM Architecture.

    The MDM service layers that make up the hub are:

    • Virtual Registry. The virtual registry is used to create a virtual view of the master data (this layer is not necessary for every MDM implementation).
    • Interface Services. The interface services work directly with the transport method (e.g. Web Service, Pub/Sub, Batch/FTP).
    • Rules Management. The rules management layer manages business rules and match rules set by the organization.
    • Lifecycle Management. This layer is responsible for managing the master data lifecycle. This includes maintaining relationships across domains, modeling classification and hierarchies within the domains, helping with master data quality through profiling rules, deduplicating and merging data to create golden records, keeping authoring logs, etc.
    • Base Services. The base services are responsible for managing all data (master, history, metadata, and reference) in the MDM hub.
    • Security. Security is the base layer and is responsible for protecting all layers of the MDM hub.

    An important architectural decision concerns where master data should live

    All MDM architectures will contain a system of entry, a system of record, and in most cases, a system of reference. Collectively, these systems identify where master data is authored and updated and which databases will serve as the authoritative source of master data records.

    System of Entry (SOE)

    System of Record (SOR)

    System of Reference (SORf)

    Any system that creates master data. It is the point in the IT architecture where one or more types of master data are entered. For example, an enterprise resource planning (ERP) application is used as a system of entry for information about business entities like products (product master data) and suppliers (supplier master data).

    The system designated as the authoritative data source for enterprise data. The true system of record is the system responsible for authoring and updating master data and this is normally the SOE. An ideal MDM system would contain and manage a single, up-to-date copy of all master data. This database would provide timely and accurate business information to be used by the relevant applications. In these cases, one or more SOE applications (e.g. customer relationship management or CRM) will be declared the SOR for certain types of data. The SOR can be made up of multiple physical subsystems.

    A replica of master data that can be synchronized with the SOR(s). It is updated regularly to resolve discrepancies between data sets, but will not always be completely up to date. Changes in the SOR are typically batched and then transmitted to the SORf. When a SORf is implemented, it acts as the authoritative source of enterprise data, given that it is updated and managed relative to the SOR. The SORf can only be used as a read-only source for data consumers.

    Central to an MDM program is the implementation of an architectural framework

    These styles are complementary and see increasing functionality; however, organizations do not need to start with consolidation.

    Consolidation

    Registry

    Coexistence

    Transactional

    What It Means

    The MDM is a system of reference (application systems serve as the systems of record). Data is created and stored in the applications and sent (generally in batch mode) to a centralized MDM system.

    The MDM is a system of reference. Master data is created and stored in the

    application systems, but key master data identifiers are linked with the MDM system, which allows a view of master data records to be assembled.

    The MDM is a system of reference. Master data is created and stored in application systems; however, an authoritative record of master data is also created (through matching) and stored in the MDM system.

    The MDM is a genuine source of record. All master data records are centrally authored and materialized in the MDM system.

    Use Case

    This style is ideal for:

    • Organizations that want to have access to master data for reporting.
    • Organizations that do not need real-time access to master data.

    This style is ideal for:

    • A view of key master data identifiers.
    • Near real-time master data reference.
    • Organizations that need access to key master data for operational systems.
    • Organizations facing strict data replication regulations.

    This style is ideal for:

    • A complete view of each master data entity.
    • Deployment of workflows for collaborative authoring.
    • A central reference system for master data.

    This style is ideal for:

    • Organizations that want true master data management.
    • Organizations that need complete, accurate, and consistent master data at all times.
    • Transactional access to master data records.
    • Tight control over master data.

    Method of Use

    Analytical

    Operational

    Analytical, operational, or collaborative

    Analytical, operational, or collaborative

    Consolidation implementation style

    Master data is created and stored in application systems and then placed in a centralized MDM hub that can be used for reference and reporting.

    The image contains a screenshot of the architectural framework and MDM hub.

    Advantages

    • Prepares master data for enterprise data warehouse and reporting by matching/merging.
    • Can serve as a basis for coexistence or transactional MDM.

    Disadvantages

    • Does not provide real-time reference because updates are sent to the MDM system in batch mode.
    • New data requirements will need to be managed at the system of entry.

    Registry implementation style

    Master data is created and stored in applications. Key identifiers are then linked to the MDM system and used as reference for operational systems.

    The image contains a screenshot of the architectural framework with a focus on registry implementation style.

    Advantages

    • Quick to deploy.
    • Can get a complete view of key master data identifiers when needed.
    • Data is always current since it is accessed from the source systems.

    Disadvantages

    • Depends on clean data at the source system level.
    • Can be complex to manage.
    • Except for the identifiers persisting in the MDM system, all master data records remain in the applications, which means there is not a complete view of all master data records.

    Coexistence implementation style

    Master data is created and stored in existing systems and then synced with the MDM system to create an authoritative record of master data.

    The image contains a screenshot of the architectural framework with a focus on the coexistence implementation style.

    Advantages

    • Easier to deploy workflows for collaborative authoring.
    • Creates a complete view for each master data record.
    • Increased master data quality.
    • Allows for data harmonization across systems.
    • Provides organizations with a central reference system.

    Disadvantages

    • Master data is altered in both the MDM system and source systems. Data may not be up to date until synchronization takes place.
    • Higher deployment costs because all master data records must be harmonized.

    Transactional implementation style

    All master data records are materialized in the MDM system, which provides the organization with a single, complete source of master data at all times.

    The image contains a screenshot of the architectural framework with a focus on the transactional implementation style.

    Advantages

    • Functions as a system of record, providing complete, consistent, accurate, and up-to-date data.
    • Provides a single location for updating and managing master data.

    Disadvantages

    • The implementation of this style may require changes to existing systems and business processes.
    • This implementation style comes with increased cost and complexity.

    All organizations are different; identify the architecture and implementation needs of your organization

    Architecture is not static – it must be able to adapt to changing business needs.

    • The implementation style an organization chooses is dependent on organizational factors such as the purpose of MDM and method of use.
    • Some master data domains may require that you start with one implementation style and later graduate to another style while retaining the existing data model, metadata, and matching rules. Select a starting implementation style that will best suit the organization.
    • Organizations with multi-domain master data may have to use multiple implementation styles. For example, data domain X may require the use of a registry implementation, while domain Y requires a coexistence implementation.

    Document your target data state surrounding MDM

    2-3 hours

    Populate the template with your target organization’s data architecture.

    Highlight new capabilities and components that MDM introduced based on MDM implementation style.

    The image contains a screenshot of the MDM Architecture Design Template.

    Input Output
    • Business process streamline
    • MDM architectural framework
    • Target data state
    Materials Participants
    • MDM Architecture Design Template ArchiMate File
    • Enterprise Architect
    • Data Architect
    • Head of Data

    Step 2.3

    Develop MDM Practice and Platform

    Objectives

    1. Review Info-Tech’s practice pattern and design your master data management practice.

    2. Design your master data management platform.

    3. Consider next steps for the MDM project.

    This step involves the following participants:

    Data Stewards or Data Custodians

    Data or Enterprise Architect

    Information Management Team

    Outcomes of this step

    Define the key services and outputs that must be delivered by establishing core capabilities, accountabilities, roles, and governance for the practice and platform.

    What does a master data management practice pattern look like?

    The master data management practice pattern describes the core capabilities, accountabilities, processes, and essential roles and the elements that provide oversight or governance of the practice, all of which are required to deliver on high-value services and deliverables or output for the organization.

    The image contains a screenshot to demonstrate the intentional relationships between the business and the master data.

    Download the Master Data Management Practice Pattern Template ArchiMate File

    Master data management data practice setup

    • Define the practice lead’s accountabilities and responsibilities.
    • Assign the practice lead.
    • Design the practice, defining the details of the practice (including the core capabilities, accountabilities, processes, and essential roles; the elements that provide oversight or governance of the practice; and the practice’s services and deliverables or output for the organization).
    • Define services and accountabilities:
    1. Define deployment and engagement model
    2. Define practice governance and metrics
    3. Define processes and deliverables
    4. Summarize capabilities
    5. Use activity slide to assign the skills to the role

    General approach to setting up data practices

    Guidelines for designing and establishing your various data practices.

    Understand master data management practice pattern

    A master data management practice pattern includes key services and outputs that must be delivered by establishing core capabilities, accountabilities, roles, and governance for the practice.

    Assumption:

    The accountabilities and responsibilities for the master data management practice have been established and assigned to a practice lead.

    1. Download and review Master Data Management Practice Pattern (Level 1 – Master Data Management Practice Pattern).
    2. Review and update master data management processes for your organization.

    Download the Master Data Management Practice Pattern Template ArchiMate File

    Info-Tech Insight

    An organization with heavy merger and acquisition activity poses a significant master data challenge. Prioritize your master data practice based on your organization’s ability to locate and maintain a single source of master data.

    The image contains a screenshot of the Master Data Management Process.

    Initiate your one-time master data management practice setup

    1. Ensure data governance committees are established.
    2. Align master data management working group responsibilities with data governance committee.
    3. Download and review Master Data Management Practice Pattern Setup (Level 1 – Master Data Management Practice Setup).
    4. Start establishing your master data practice:
    5. 4.1 Define services and accountabilities

      4.2 Define processes and deliverables by stakeholder

      4.3 Design practice operating model

      4.4 Perform skills inventory and design roles

      4.5 Determine practice governance and metrics

      4.6 Summarize practice capabilities

    6. Define key master data management deliverable and processes.

    The image contains a screenshot of the Process Template MDM Conflict Resolution.

    Download and Update:

    Process Template: MDM Conflict Resolution

    MDM operating model

    The operating model is a visualization of how MDM commonly operates and the value it brings to the organization. It illustrates the master data flow, which works from left to right, from source system to consumption layer. Another important component of the model is the business data glossary, which is part of your data governance plan, to define terminology and master data’s key characteristics across business units.

    The image contains a screenshot of the MDM Operating Model.

    Choosing the appropriate technology capabilities

    An MDM platform should include certain core technical capabilities:

    • Master data hub: Functions as a system of reference, providing an authoritative source of data in read-only format to systems downstream.
    • Data modeling: Ability to model complex relationships between internal application sources and other parties.
    • Workflow management: Ability to support flexible and comprehensive workflow-based capabilities.
    • Relationship and hierarchies: Ability to determine relationships and identify hierarchies within the same domain or across different domains of master data.
    • Information quality: Ability to profile, cleanse, match, link, identify, and reconcile master data in different data sources to create and maintain the “golden record.”
    • Loading, integration, synchronization: Ability to load data quality tools and integrate so there is a bidirectional flow of data. Enable data migration and updates that prevent duplicates within the incoming data and data found in the hub.
    • Security: Ability to control access of MDM and the ability to report on activities. Ability to configure and manage different rules and visibilities.
    • Ease of use: Including different user interfaces for technical and business roles.
    • Scalability and high performance/high availability: Ability to expand or shrink depending on the business needs and maintain a high service level.

    Other requirements may include:

    • MDM solution that can handle multiple domains on a single set of technology and hardware.
    • Offers a broad set of data integration connectors out of the box.
    • Offers flexible deployments (on-premises, cloud, as-a-service).
    • Supports all architectural implementation styles: registry, consolidation, coexistence, and transactional.
    • Data governance tools: workflow and business process management (BPM) functionality to link data governance with operational MDM.
    • Uses AI to automate MDM processes.

    Info-Tech Research Group’s MDM platform

    The image contains a screenshot of Info-Tech's MDM Platform.

    Info-Tech Research Group’s MDM platform summarizes an organization’s data environment and the technical capabilities that should be taken into consideration for your organization's MDM implementation.

    Design your master data management platform

    2-3 hours

    Instructions

    Download the Master Data Management Platform Template.

    The platform is not static. Adapt the template to your own needs based on your target data state, required technical capabilities, and business use cases.

    The image contains a screenshot of Info-Tech's MDM Platform.

    Input Output
    • Technology capabilities
    • Target data state
    • Master Data Management Platform
    Materials Participants
    • Master Data Management Platform Template
    • Data Architect
    • Enterprise Architect
    • Head of Data

    Download the MDM Platform Template

    Next steps for the MDM project

    There are several deployment options for MDM platforms; pick the one best suited to the organization’s business needs:

    On-Premises Solutions

    Cloud Solutions

    Hybrid Solutions

    Embrace the technology

    MDM has traditionally been an on-premises initiative. On-premises solutions have typically had different instances for various divisions. On-premises solutions offer interoperability and consistency.

    Many IT teams of larger companies prefer an on-premises implementation. They want to purchase a perpetual MDM software license, install it on hardware systems, configure and test the MDM software, and maintain it on an ongoing basis.

    Cloud MDM solutions can be application-specific or platform-specific, which involves using a software platform or web-based portal interface to connect internal and external data. Cloud is seen as a more cost-effective MDM solution as it doesn’t require a large IT staff to configure the system and can be paid for through a monthly subscription. Because many organizations are averse to storing their master data outside of their firewalls, some cloud MDM solutions manage the data where it resides (either software as a service or on-premises), rather than maintaining it in the cloud.

    MDM system resides both on premises and in the cloud. As many organizations have some applications on premises and others in the cloud, having a hybrid MDM solution is a realistic option for many. MDM can be leveraged from either on-premises or in the cloud solutions, depending on the current needs of the organization.

    • Vendor-supplied MDM solutions often provide complete technical functionality in the package and various deployment options.
    • Consider leverage Info-Tech’s SoftwareReviews to accelerate and improve your software selection process.

    Capitalizing on trends in the MDM technology space would increase your competitive edge

    AI improves master data management.

    • With MDM technology improving every year, there are a greater number of options to choose from than ever before. AI is one of the hottest trends in MDM.
    • By using machine learning (ML) techniques, AI can automate many activities surrounding MDM to ease manual processes and improve accuracy, such as automating master data profiling, managing workflow, identifying duplication, and suggesting match and merge proposals.
    • Some other powerful applications include product categorization and hierarchical management. The product is assigned to the correct level of the category hierarchy based on the probability that a block of words in a product title or description belongs to product categories (Informatica, 2021).

    Info-Tech Insight

    Leverage modern capabilities such as AI and ML to support large and complex MDM deployments.

    The image contains a screenshot of the AI Activities in MDM.

    Informatica, 2021

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Build Your Data Quality Program

    • Data needs to be good, but truly spectacular data may go unnoticed. Provide the right level of data quality, with the appropriate effort, for the correct usage. This blueprint will help you determine what “the right level of data quality” means and create a plan to achieve that goal for the business.

    Build a Data Architecture Roadmap

    • Optimizing data architecture requires a plan, not just a data model.

    Create a Data Management Roadmap

    • Streamline your data management program with our simplified framework.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Build a Robust and Comprehensive Data Strategy

    • Formulate a data strategy that stitches all of the pieces together to better position you to unlock the value in your data.

    Build Your Data Practice and Platform

    • The true value of data comes from defining intentional relationships between the business and the data through a well-thought-out data platform and practice.

    Establish Data Governance

    • Establish data trust and accountability with strong governance.

    Research Authors and Contributors

    Authors:

    Name

    Position

    Company

    Ruyi Sun

    Research Specialist, Data & Analytics

    Info-Tech Research Group

    Rajesh Parab

    Research Director, Data & Analytics

    Info-Tech Research Group

    Contributors:

    Name

    Position

    Company

    Selwyn Samuel

    Director of Enterprise Architecture

    Furniture manufacturer

    Julie Hunt

    Consultant and Author

    Hub Designs Magazine and Julie Hunt Consulting

    David Loshin

    President

    Knowledge Integrity Inc.

    Igor Ikonnikov

    Principal Advisory Director

    Info-Tech Research Group

    Irina Sedenko

    Advisory Director

    Info-Tech Research Group

    Anu Ganesh

    Principal Research Director

    Info-Tech Research Group

    Wayne Cain

    Principal Advisory Director

    Info-Tech Research Group

    Reddy Doddipalli

    Senior Workshop Director

    Info-Tech Research Group

    Imad Jawadi

    Senior Manager, Consulting

    Info-Tech Research Group

    Andy Neill

    Associate Vice President

    Info-Tech Research Group

    Steve Wills

    Practice Lead

    Info-Tech Research Group

    Bibliography

    “DAMA Guide to the Data Management Body of Knowledge (DAMA-DMBOK Guide).” First Edition. DAMA International. 2009. Digital. April 2014.
    “State of the Connected Customer, Fifth Edition.” Salesforce, 2022. Accessed Jan. 2023.
    “The new digital edge: Rethinking strategy for the postpandemic era.” McKinsey & Company, 26 May. 2021. Assessed Dec. 2022.
    “Value and resilience through better risk management.” Mckinsey & Company, 1 Oct. 2018. Assessed Dec. 2022.
    “Plotting a course through turbulent times (9TH ANNUAL B2B SALES & MARKETING DATA REPORT)” Dun & Bradstreet, 2022. Assessed Jan. 2023.
    ““How to Win on Customer Experience.”, Deloitte Digital, 2020. Assessed Dec. 2022.
    “CX Trends 2022.”, Zendesk, 2022. Assessed Jan. 2023
    .”Global consumer trends to watch out for in 2023.” Qualtrics XM Institute, 8 Nov. 2022. Assessed Dec. 2022
    “How to Understand Single Versus Multiple Software Instances.” Brightwork Research & Analysis, 24 Mar. 2021. Assessed Dec. 2022
    “What is omnichannel?” Oracle. Assessed Dec. 2022
    “How AI Improves Master Data Management (MDM).” Informatica, 30 May. 2021. Assessed Dec. 2022

    Develop an IT Strategy to Support Customer Service

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}528|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Customer Relationship Management
    • Parent Category Link: /customer-relationship-management
    • Customer expectations regarding service are rapidly evolving. As your current IT systems may be viewed as ineffective at delivering upon these expectations, a transformation is called for.
    • It is unclear whether IT has the system architecture/infrastructure to support modern Customer Service channels and technologies.
    • The relationship between Customer Service and IT is strained. Strategic system-related decisions are being made without the inclusions of IT, and IT is only engaged post-purchase to address integration or issues as they arise.
    • Scope: An ABPM-centric approach is taken to model the desired future state, and retrospectively look into the current state to derive gaps and sequential requirements. The requirements are bundled into logical IT initiatives to be plotted on a roadmap and strategy document.
    • Challenge: The extent to which business processes can be mapped down to task-based Level 5 can be challenging depending on the maturity of the organization.
    • Pain/Risk: The health of the relationship between IT and Customer Service may determine project viability. Poor collaboration and execution may strain the relationship further.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • When transformation is called for, start with future state visioning. Current state analysis can impede your ability to see future needs and possibilities.
    • Solve your own problems by enhancing core or “traditional” Customer Service functionality first, and then move on to more ambitious business enabling functionality.
    • The more rapidly businesses can launch applications in today’s market, the better positioned they are to improve customer experience and reap the associated benefits. Ensure that technology is implemented with a solid strategy to support the initiative.

    Impact and Result

    • The right technology is established to support current and future Customer Service needs.
    • Streamlined and optimized Customer Service processes that drive efficiency and improve Customer Service quality are established.
    • The IT and Customer Service functions are both transformed from a cost center into a competitive advantage.

    Develop an IT Strategy to Support Customer Service Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Structure the project

    Identify project stakeholders, define roles, and create the project charter.

    • Develop an IT Strategy to Support Customer Service Storyboard
    • Project RACI Chart
    • Project Charter

    2. Define vision for future state

    Identify and model the future state of key business processes.

    • Customer Service Business Process Shortlisting Tool
    • Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool

    3. Document current state and assess gaps

    Model the current state of key business processes and assess gaps.

    4. Evaluate solution options

    Review the outputs of the current state architecture health assessment and adopt a preliminary posture on architecture.

    5. Evaluate application options

    Evaluate the marketplace applications to understand the “art of the possible.”

    6. Frame desired state and develop roadmap

    Compile and score a list of initiatives to bridge the gaps, and plot the initiatives on a strategic roadmap.

    • Customer Service Initiative Scoring and Roadmap
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Develop an IT Strategy to Support Customer Service

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Define Vision for Future State

    The Purpose

    Discuss Customer Service-related organizational goals and align goals with potential strategies for implementation.

    Score level 5 Customer Service business processes against organizational goals to come up with a shortlist for modeling.

    Create a future state model for one of the shortlisted business processes.

    Draft the requirements as they relate to the business process.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Preliminary list of Customer Service-related business goals

    List of Customer Service business processes (Task Level 5)

    Pre-selected Customer Service business process for modeling

    Activities

    1.1 Outline and prioritize your customer goals and link their relevance and value to your Customer Service processes with the Customer Service Business Process Shortlisting Tool.

    1.2 Score customer service business processes against organizational goals with the Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool.

    Outputs

    Initial position on viable Customer Service strategies

    Shortlist of key business processes

    Documented future state business process model

    Business/functional/non-functional requirements

    2 Document Current State and Assess Gaps

    The Purpose

    Create a current state model for the shortlisted business processes.

    Score the functionality and integration of current supporting applications.

    Revise future state model and business requirements.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Inventory of Customer Service supporting applications

    Inventory of related system interfaces

    Activities

    2.1 Holistically assess multiple aspects of Customer Service-related IT assets with the Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool.

    Outputs

    Documented current state business process model

    Customer Service systems health assessment

    3 Adopt an Architectural Posture

    The Purpose

    Review the Customer Service systems health assessment results.

    Discuss options.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Completed Customer Service systems health assessment

    Application options

    Activities

    3.1 Analyze CS Systems Strategy and review results with the Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool

    Outputs

    Posture on system architecture

    4 Frame Desired State and Develop Roadmap

    The Purpose

    Draft a list of initiatives based on requirements.

    Score and prioritize the initiatives.

    Plot the initiatives on a roadmap.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Business/functional/non-functional requirements

    Activities

    4.1 Help project and management stakeholders visualize the implementation of Customer Service IT initiatives with the Customer Service Initiative Scoring and Roadmap Tool.

    Outputs

    Scored and prioritized list of initiatives

    Customer Service implementation roadmap

    Further reading

    Develop an IT Strategy to Support Customer Service

    E-commerce is accelerating, and with it, customer expectations for exceptional digital service.

    Analyst Perspective

    The future of Customer Service is digital. Your organization needs an IT strategy to meet this demand.

    The image contains a picture of Thomas E. Randall.

    As the pandemic closed brick-and-mortar stores, the acceleration of ecommerce has cemented Customer Service’s digital future. However, the pandemic also revealed severe cracks in the IT strategy of organizations’ Customer Service – no matter the industry. These cracks may include low resolution and high wait times through the contact center, or a lack of analytics that fuel a reactive environment. Unfortunately, organizations have no time to waste in resolving these issues. Customer patience for poor digital service has only decreased since March 2020, leaving organizations with little to no runway for ramping up their IT strategy.

    Organizations that quickly mature their digital Customer Service will come out the other side of COVID-19 more competitive and with a stronger reputation. This move necessitates a concrete IT strategy for coordinating what the organization’s future state should look like and agreeing on the technologies and software required to meet this state across the entire organization.

    Thomas E. Randall, Ph.D.

    Senior Research Analyst, Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    Common Obstacles

    Info-Tech’s Solution

    • COVID-19 has accelerated ecommerce, rapidly evolving customer expectations about the service they should receive. Without a robust IT strategy for enabling remote, contactless points of service, your organization will quickly fall behind.
    • The organization would like to use modern channels and technologies to enhance customer service, but it is unclear whether IT has the infrastructure to support them.
    • The relationship between Customer Service and IT is strained. Strategic system-related decisions are being made without the inclusion of IT.
    • IT is in a permanent reactive state, only engaged post-purchase to fix issues as they arise and to offer workarounds.
    • Use Info-Tech’s methodology to produce an IT strategy for Customer Service:
      • Phase 1: Define Project and Future State
      • Phase 2: Evaluate Current State
      • Phase 3: Build a Roadmap to Future State
    • Each phase contributes toward this blueprint’s key deliverable: the Strategic Roadmap.

    Info-Tech Insight

    IT must proactively engage with the organization to define what good customer service should look like. This ensures IT has a fair say in what kinds of architectural solutions are feasible for any projected future state. In this proactive scenario, IT can help build the roadmap for implementing and maintaining customer service infrastructure and operations, reducing the time and resources spent on putting out preventable fires or trying to achieve an unworkable goal set by the organization.

    Key insights

    Develop an IT Strategy to Support Customer Service

    Ecommerce growth has increased customer expectations

    Despite the huge obstacles that organizations are having to overcome to meet accelerating ecommerce from the pandemic, customers have not increased their tolerance for organizations with poor service. Indeed, customer expectations for excellent digital service have only increased since March 2020. If organizations cannot meet these demands, they will become uncompetitive.

    The future of customer service is tied up in analytics

    Without a coordinated IT strategy for leveraging technology and data to improve Customer Service, the organization will quickly be left behind. Analytics and reporting are crucial for proactively engaging with customers, planning marketing campaigns, and building customer profiles. Failing to do so leaves the organization blind to customer needs and will constantly be in firefighting mode.

    Meet the customer wherever they are – no matter the channel

    Providing an omnichannel experience is fast becoming a table stakes offering for customers. To maximize customer engagement and service, the organization must connect with the customer on whatever channel the customer prefers – be it social media, SMS, or by phone. While voice will continue to dominate how Customer Service connects with customers, demographics are shifting toward a digital-first generation. Organizations must be ready to capture this rapidly expanding audience.

    This blueprint will achieve:

    Increased customer satisfaction

    • An IT strategy for Customer Service that proactively meets customer demand, improving overall customer satisfaction with the organization’s services.
    • A process for identifying the organization’s future state of Customer Service and developing a concrete gap analysis.

    Time saved

    • Ready-to-use deliverables that analyze and provide a roadmap toward the organization’s desired future state.
    • Market analyses and rapid application selection through SoftwareReviews to streamline project time-to-completion.

    Increased ROI

    • A modernization process that aids Customer Service digital transformation, with a view to achieve high ROI.
    • Save costs through an effective requirements gathering method.
    • Building and expanding the organization’s customer base to increase revenues by meeting the customers where they are – no matter what channel.

    An IT strategy for customer service is imperative for a post-COVID world

    COVID-19 has accelerated ecommerce, rapidly evolving customer expectations for remote, contactless service.

    59% Of customers agree that the pandemic has raised their standards for service (Salesforce, 2020).

    • With COVID-19, most customer demand and employment moved online and turned remote.
    • Retailers had to rapidly respond, meeting customer demand through ecommerce. This not only entailed a complete shift in how customers could buy their goods but how retailers could provide a remote customer journey from discovery to post-purchase support.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The pandemic did not improve customer tolerance for bad service – instead, the demand for good service increased dramatically. Organizations need an IT strategy to meet customer support demands wherever the customer is located.

    The technology to provide remote customer support is surging

    IT needs to be at the forefront of learning about and suggesting new technologies, working with Customer Service to deliver a consistent, business-driven approach.

    78%

    Of decision makers say they’ve invested in new technology as a result of the pandemic (Salesforce, 2020).

    OMNICHANNEL SUPPORT

    Rapidly changing demographics and modes of communications require an evolution toward omnichannel engagement. Agents need customer information synced across each channel they use, meeting the customer’s needs where they are.

    78%

    Of customers have increased their use of self-service during the pandemic (Salesforce, 2020).

    INTELLIGENT SELF-SERVICE PORTALS

    Customers want their issues resolved as quickly as possible. Machine-learning self-service options deliver personalized customer experiences, which also reduce both agent call volume and support costs for the organization.

    90%

    Of global executives who use data analytics report that they improved their ability to deliver a great customer experience (Gottlieb, 2019).

    LEVERAGING ANALYTICS

    The future of customer service is tied up with analytics: from AI-driven capabilities that include agent assist and using biometric data (e.g., speech) for security, to feeding real insights about how customers and agents are doing and performing.

    Executive Brief – Case Study

    Self-service options improve quality of service and boost organization’s competitiveness in a digital marketspace.

    INDUSTRY: Financial Services

    SOURCE: TSB

    Situation

    Solution

    Results

    • The pandemic increased pressure on TSB’s Customer Service, with higher call loads from their five million customers who were anxious about their financial situation.
    • TSB needed to speed up its processing times to ensure loan programs and other assistances were provided as quickly as possible.
    • As meeting in-person became impossible due to the lockdown, TSB had to step up its digital abilities to serve their customers.
    • TSB sought to boost its competitiveness by shifting as far as possible to digital services.
    • TSB launched government loan programs in 36 hours, ahead of its competitors.
    • TSB created and released 21 digital self-service forms for customers to complete without needing to interact with bank staff.
    • TSB processed 140,000 forms in three months, replacing 15,000 branch visits.
    • TSB increased digital self-service rate by nine percent.

    IT can demonstrate its value to business by enhancing remote customer service

    IT must engage with Customer Service – otherwise, IT risks being perennially reactive and dictated to as remote customer service needs increase.

    IT benefits

    Customer Service benefits

    • The right technology is established to support Customer Service.
    • IT is viewed as a strategic partner and innovator, not just a cost center and support function.
    • Streamlined and optimized Customer Service processes that drive efficiency and improve Customer Service quality.
    • Transformation of the Customer Service function into a competitive advantage.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Change to how Customer Service will operate is inevitable. This is an opportunity for IT to establish their value to the business and improve their autonomy in how new technologies should be onboarded and utilized.

    Customer Service and IT need to work together to mitigate their pain points

    IT and Customer Service have an opportunity to reinforce and build their organization’s customer base by working together to streamline operations.

    IT pain points

    Customer Service pain points

    • IT lacks understanding of Customer Service challenges and pain points.
    • IT has technical debt or constrained technology funding.
    • The IT department is viewed as a cost center and support organization, not an engine of innovation, growth, and service delivery performance.
    • Processes supporting Customer Service delivery may be sub-optimal.
    • The existing technology cannot support the increasingly advanced needs of Customer Service functions.
    • Customer Service isn’t fully aware of what your customers think of your service quality. There is little to no monitoring of customer sentiment.
    • There is a lack of value-based segmentation of customers and information on their channel usage and preferences.
    • Competitor actions are not actively monitored.

    IT often cannot spark a debate with Customer Service on whether a decision made without IT is misaligned with corporate direction. It’s almost always an uphill battle for IT.

    Sahri Lava, Research Director, IDC

    Develop an IT Strategy to Support Customer Service

    DON’T FALL BEHIND

    70% of companies either have a digital transformation strategy in place or are working on one (Tech Pro Research, 2018). Unless IT can enable technology that meets the customer where they are, the organization will quickly fall behind in an age of accelerating ecommerce.

    DEVELOP FUTURE STATES

    Many customer journeys are now exclusively digital – 63% of customers expect to receive service over social media (Ringshall, 2020). Organization’s need an IT strategy to develop the future of their customer service – from leveraging analytics to self-service AI portals.

    BUILD GAP ANALYSIS

    73% of customers prefer to shop across multiple channels (Sopadjieva et al., 2017). Assess your current state’s application integrations and functionality to ensure your future state can accurately sync customer information across each channel.

    SHORTLIST SOLUTIONS

    Customer relationship management software is one of the world's fastest growing industries (Kuligowski, 2022). Choosing a best-fit solution requires an intricate analysis of the market, future trends, and your organization’s requirements.

    ADVANCE CHANGE

    95% of customers cite service as key to their brand loyalty (Microsoft, 2019). Build out your roadmap for the future state to retain and build your customer base moving forward.

    Use Info-Tech’s method to produce an IT strategy for Customer Service:

    PHASE 1: Define Project and Future State

    Output: Project Charter and Future State Business Processes

    1.1 Structure the Project

    1.2 Define a Vision for Future State

    1.3 Document Preliminary Requirements

    KEY DELIVERABLE:

    Strategic Roadmap

    The image contains a screenshot of the strategic roadmap.

    PHASE 2: Evaluate Current State

    Output: Requirements Identified to Bridge Current to Future State

    2.1 Document Current State Business Processes

    2.2 Assess Current State Architecture

    2.3 Review and Finalize Requirements for Future State

    PHASE 3: Build a Roadmap to Future State

    Output: Initiatives and Strategic Roadmap

    3.1 Evaluate Architectural and Application Options

    3.2 Understand the Marketplace

    3.3 Score and Plot Initiatives Along Your Strategic Roadmap

    Key deliverable and tools outline

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting materials to help you accomplish your goals.

    Project RACI Chart

    Activity 1.1a Organize roles and responsibilities for carrying out project steps.

    The image contains a screenshot of the Project RACI Chart.

    Key Deliverable:

    Strategic Roadmap

    Develop, prioritize, and implement key initiatives for your customer service IT strategy, plotting and tracking them on an easy-to-read timeline.

    The image contains a screenshot of the Strategic Roadmap.

    Business Process Shortlisting Tool

    Activities 1.2a, 1.2b, and 2.1aOutline and prioritize customer service goals.

    The image contains a screenshot of the Business Process Shortlisting Tool.

    Project Charter Template

    Activity 1.1b Define the project, its key deliverables, and metrics for success.

    The image contains a screenshot of the Project Charter Template.

    Systems Strategy Tool

    Activities 1.3a, Phase 2, 3.1a Prioritize requirements, assess current state customer service functions, and decide what to do with your current systems going forward.

    .The image contains a screenshot of the Systems Strategy Tool.

    Looking ahead: defining metrics for success

    Phase 1 of this blueprint will help solidify how to measure this project’s success. Start looking ahead now.

    For example, the metrics below show the potential business benefits for several stakeholders through building an IT strategy for Customer Service. These stakeholders include agents, customers, senior leadership, and IT. The benefits of this project are listed to the right.

    Metric Description

    Current Metric

    Future Goal

    Number of channels for customer contact

    1

    6

    Customer self-service resolution

    0%

    50%

    % ROI

    - 4%

    11%

    Agent satisfaction

    42%

    75%

    As this project nears completion:

    1. Customers will have more opportunities for self-service resolution.
    2. Agents will experience higher satisfaction, improving attrition rates.
    3. The organization will experience higher ROI from its digital Customer Service investments.
    4. Customers can engage the contact center via a communication channel that suits them.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    “Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”“Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”“We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”“Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical Guided Implementation on this topic look like?

    Define Project and Future StateDocument and Assess Current StateEvaluate Architectural and Application OptionsBuild Roadmap to Future State

    Call #1: Introduce project, defining its vision and metrics of success.

    Call #2: Review environmental scan to define future state vision.

    Call #3: Examine future state business processes to compile initial requirements.

    Call #4: Document current state business processes.

    Call #5: Assess current customer service IT architecture.

    Call #6: Refine and prioritize list of requirements for future state.

    Call #7: Evaluate architectural options.

    Call #8: Evaluate application options.

    Call #9:Develop and score initiatives to future state.

    Call #10: Develop timeline and roadmap.

    Call #11: Review progress and wrap-up project.

    A Guided Implementation is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical Guided Implementation is two to 12 calls over the course of four to six months.

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com1-888-670-8889

    Day 1Day 2Day 3Day 4Day 5

    Define Your Vision for Future State

    Document Current State and Assess Gaps

    Adopt an Architectural Posture

    Frame Desired State and Develop Roadmap

    Communicate and Implement

    Activities

    1.1 Outline and prioritize your customer goals.

    1.2 Link customer service goals’ relevance and value to your Customer Service processes.

    1.3 Score Customer Service business processes against organizational goals.

    2.1 Holistically assess multiple aspects of Customer Service-related IT assets with Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool.

    3.1 Analyze Customer Service Systems Strategy and review results with the Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool.

    4.1 Help project management stakeholders visualize implementation of Customer Service IT initiatives.

    4.2 Build strategic roadmap and plot initiatives.

    5.1 Finalize deliverables.

    5.2 Support communication efforts.

    5.3 Identify resources in support of priority initiatives.

    Deliverables

    1. Initial position on viable Customer Service strategies.
    2. Shortlist of key business processes.
    3. Documented future-state business process model.
    4. Business/functional/non-functional requirements.
    1. Documented current state business process model.
    2. Customer Service systems health assessment.
    3. Inventory of Customer Service supporting applications.
    4. Inventory of related system interfaces.
    1. Posture on system architecture.
    2. Completed Customer Service systems health assessment.
    3. List of application options.
    1. Scored and prioritized list of initiatives.
    2. Customer Service implementation roadmap.
    1. Customer Service IT Strategy Roadmap.
    2. Mapping of Info-Tech resources against individual initiatives.

    Phase 1

    Define Project and Future State

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    Phase 3

    1.1 Structure the Project

    1.2 Define Vision for Future State

    1.3 Document Preliminary Requirements

    2.1 Document Current State Business Processes

    2.2 Assess Current State Architecture

    2.3 Review and Finalize Requirements for Future State

    3.1 Evaluate Architectural and Application Options

    3.2 Understand the Marketplace

    3.3 Score and Plot Initiatives Along Strategic Roadmap

    This phase will guide you through the following activities:

    1.1a Create your project’s RACI chart to establish key roles throughout the timeline of the project.

    1.1b Finalize your project charter that captures the key goals of the project, ready to communicate to stakeholders for approval.

    1.2a Begin documenting business processes to establish potential future states.

    1.2b Model future state business processes for looking beyond current constraints and building the ideal scenario.

    1.3a Document your preliminary requirements for concretizing a future state and performing a gap analysis.

    Participants required for Phase 1:

    • Applications Director
    • Customer Service Director
    • IT and Customer Service Representatives

    1.1 Identify process owners early for successful project execution

    IT and Customer Service must work in tandem throughout the project. Both teams’ involvement ensures all stakeholders are heard and support the final decision.

    Customer Service Perspective

    IT Perspective

    • Customer Service is the victim of pain points resulting from suboptimal systems and it stands to gain the most benefits from a well-planned systems strategy.
    • Looking to reduce pain points, Customer Service will likely initiate, own, and participate heavily in the project.
    • Customer Service must avoid the tendency to make IT-independent decisions. This could lead to disparate systems that contribute little to the overall organizational goals.
    • IT owns the application and back-end support of all Customer Service business processes. Any technological aspect of processes will need IT involvement.
    • IT may or may not have the mandate to run the Customer Service strategy project. Responsibility for systems decisions remains with IT.
    • IT should own the task of filtering out unnecessary or infeasible application and technology decisions. IT capabilities to support such acquisitions and post-purchase maintenance must be considered.

    Info-Tech Insight

    While involving management is important for high-level strategic decisions, input from those who interact day-to-day with the systems is a crucial component to a well-planned strategy.

    1.1 Define project roles and responsibilities to improve progress tracking

    Assign responsibilities, accountabilities, and other project involvement roles using a RACI chart.

    • IT should involve Customer Service from the beginning of project planning to implementation and execution. The project requires input and knowledge from both functions to succeed.
    • Do not let the tasks be forgotten within inter-functional communication. Define roles and responsibilities for the project as early as possible.
    • Each member of the project team should be given a RACI designation, which will vary for each task to ensure clear ownership, execution, and progress tracking.
    • Assigning RACI early can:
      • Improve project quality by assigning the right people to the right tasks.
      • Improve chances of project task completion by assigning clear accountabilities.
      • Improve project buy-in by ensuring that stakeholders are kept informed of project progress, risks, and successes.

    R – Responsibility

    A – Accountability

    C – Consulted

    I – Informed

    1.1 Use Info-Tech’s recommended process owners and roles for this blueprint

    Customer Service Head

    Customer Service Director

    CIO

    Applications Director*

    CEO/COO

    Marketing Head

    Sales Head

    Determine Project Suitability

    ARCCCII

    Phase 1.1

    CCARIII

    Phases 1.2 – 1.3

    ARCCICC

    Phase 2

    ARICIII

    Phase 3.1

    (Architectural options)

    CCARIII

    Phase 3.1

    (Application options)

    ACIRICC

    Phases 3.2 – 3.3

    CCARCII

    * The Applications Director is to compile a list of Customer Service systems; the Customer Service Director is responsible for vetting a list and mapping it to Customer Service functions.

    ** The Applications Director is responsible for technology-related decisions (e.g. SaaS or on-premise, integration issues); the Customer Service Director is responsible for functionality-related decisions.

    1.1a Create your project’s RACI chart

    1 hour

    1. The Applications Director and Customer Service Head should identify key participants and stakeholders of the project.
    2. Use Info-Tech’s Project RACI Chart to identify ownership of tasks.
    3. Record roles in the Project RACI Chart.
    The image contains a screenshot of the project RACI chart.
    InputOutput
    • Identification of key project participants and stakeholders.
    • Identification of key project participants and stakeholders.

    Materials

    Participants

    • Project RACI Chart
    • Applications Director
    • Customer Service Director

    Download the Project RACI Chart

    1.1 Start developing the project charter

    A project charter should address the following:

    • Executive Summary and Project Overview
      • Goals
      • Benefits
      • Critical Success Factors
    • Scope
    • Key Deliverables
    • Stakeholders and RACI
    • Risk Assessment
      • What are some risks you may encounter during project execution?
    • Projected Timeline and Key Milestones
    • Review and Approval Process

    What is a project charter?

    • The project charter defines the project and lays the foundation for all subsequent project planning.
    • Once approved by the business, the charter gives the project lead formal authority to initiate the project.

    Why create a project charter?

    • The project charter allows all parties involved to reach an agreement and document major aspects of the project.
    • It also supports the decision-making process and can be used as a communication tool.

    Stakeholders must:

    • Understand and agree on the objectives and important characteristics of the project charter before the project is initiated.
    • Be given the opportunity to adjust the project charter to better address their needs and concerns.

    1.1b Finalize the project charter

    1-2 hours

    1. Request relevant individuals and parties to complete sections of Info-Tech’s Project Charter Template.
    2. Input the simplified RACI output from tab 3 in Info-Tech’s Project RACI Chart tool into the RACI section of the charter.
    3. Send the completed template to the CIO and Customer Service Head for approval.
    4. Communicate the document to stakeholders for changes and finalization.
    The image contains a screenshot of the Project Charter Template.

    Input

    Output

    • Customer Service and IT strategies
    • Justification of impetus to begin this project
    • Timeline estimates
    • A completed project charter that captures the key goals of the project, ready to communicate to stakeholders for approval.

    Materials

    Participants

    • Project RACI Chart
    • Project Charter Template
    • Applications Director
    • Customer Service Director

    Download the Project Charter Template

    1.2 IT must play a role shaping Customer Service’s future vision

    IT is only one or two degrees of separation from the end customer – their involvement can significantly impact the customer experience.

    IT

    Customer Service

    Customer

    Customer Service-Facing Application

    Customer-Facing Application

    • IT enables, supports, and maintains the applications used by the Customer Service organization to service customers. IT provides the infrastructural and technical foundation to operate the function.
    • IT supports customer-facing interfaces and channels for Customer Service interaction.
    • Channel examples include web pages, mobile device applications and optimization, and interactive voice response for callers.

    1.2 Establish a vision for Customer Service excellence

    Info-Tech has identified three prominent Customer Service strategic patterns. Evaluate which fits best with your situation and organization.

    Retention

    Efficiency

    Cross-Sell/Up-Sell

    Ensuring customers remain customers by providing proactive customer service and a seamless omnichannel strategy.

    Reducing costs by diverting customers to lower cost channels and empowering agents to solve problems quickly.

    Maximizing the value of existing customers by capitalizing on cross-sell and up-sell opportunities.

    1.2 Let profitability goals help reveal which strategy to pursue

    Profitability goals are tied to the enabling of customer service strategies.

    • If looking to drive cost decreases across the organization, pursue cost efficiency strategies such as customer volume diversion in order to lower cost channels and avoid costly escalations for customer complaints and inquiries.
    • Ongoing Contribution Margin is positive only once customer acquisition costs (CAC) have been paid back. For every customer lost, another customer has to be acquired in order to experience no loss. In this way, customer retention strategies help decrease your overall costs.
    • Once cost reduction and customer retention measures are in place, look to increase overall revenue through cross-selling and up-selling activities with your customers.
    The image contains a screenshot of a diagram to demonstrate the relationship between goals and enabling strategies.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Purely driving efficiency is not the goal. Create a balance that does not compromise customer satisfaction.

    Customer Service strategies: Case studies

    Efficiency

    • Volume diversion to lower cost channels
    • Agent empowerment

    MISS DIG 811 – a utility notification system – sought to make their customer service more efficient by moving to softphones. Using the Cisco Customer Journey Platform, Miss Dig saw a 9% YoY increase in agent productivity and 83% reduction in phone equipment costs. Source: (Cisco, 2018).

    Retention

    • Proactive Customer Service
    • Seamless omnichannel strategy

    VoiceSage worked with Home Retail Group – a general merchandise retailer – to proactively increase customer outreach, reducing the number of routine customer order and delivery queries received. In four weeks, Home Retail Group increased their 30-40% answer rate from customers to 100%, with 90% of incoming calls answered and 60% of contacts made via SMS. Source: (VoiceSage, 2018)

    Cross-Sell/

    Up-Sell

    • Cross-Sell and Up-Sell opportunities

    A global brand selling language-learning software utilized Callzilla to help improve their call conversion rate of 2%. After six months of agent and supervisor training, this company increased their call conversion rate to 16% and their upsell rate to 40%. Their average order value increased from < $300 to $465. Source: (Callzilla, n.d.)

    1.2 Performing an environmental scan can help IT optimize Customer Service support

    Though typically executed by Customer Service, IT can gain valuable insights for best supporting infrastructure, applications, and operations from an environmental scan.

    An environmental scan seeks to understand your organization’s customers from multiple directions. It considers:

    • Customers’ value-based segmentations.
    • The interaction channels customers prefer to use.
    • Customers’ likes and dislikes.
    • The general sentiment of your customer service quality.
    • What your competitors are doing in this space.
    The image contains a screenshot of a diagram to demonstrate how performing an environmental scan can help IT optimize Customer Service support.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Business processes must directly relate to customer service. Failing to correlate customer experience with business performance outcomes overlooks the enormous cost of negative sentiment.

    1.2 The environmental scan results should drive IT’s strategy and resource spend

    Insights derived from this scan can help frame IT’s contributions to Customer Service’s future vision.

    Why IT should care:

    Implications:

    Each customer experience, from product/service selection to post-transaction support, can have a significant impact on business performance.

    It is not just IT or Customer Service that should care; rather, it should be an organizational responsibility to care about what customers say.

    Customers have little tolerance for mediocrity or poor service and simply switch their allegiances to those that can satisfy their expectations.

    Do not ignore your competitors; they may be doing something well in Customer Service technology which may serve as your organization’s benchmark.

    With maturing mobile and social technologies, customers want to be treated as individuals rather than as a series of disconnected accounts

    Do not ignore your customers’ plea for individuality through mobile and social. Assess your customers’ technology channel preferences.

    Customer service’s perception of service quality may be drastically different than what is expected by the customers.

    Prevent your organization from investing in technology that will have no positive impact on your customer experience.

    Some customers may not provide your organization the business value that surpasses your cost to serve them.

    Focus on enhancing the technology and customer service experience for your high-value customers.

    1.2 Have Customer Service examine feedback across channels for a holistic view

    Your method of listening needs to evolve to include active listening on social and mobile channels.

    Insights and Implications for Customer Service

    Limitations of conventional listening:

    • Solicited customer feedback, such as surveys, do not provide an accurate feedback method since customers only have one channel to express their views.
    • Sentiment, voice, and text analytics within social media channels provide the most accurate and timely intelligence.

    How IT Can Help

    IT can help facilitate the customer feedback process by:

    • Conducting customer feedback with voice recognition software.
    • Monitoring customer sentiment on mobile and social channels.
    • Utilizing customer data analytic engines on social media management platforms.
    • Referring Customer Service to customer advisory councils and their databases.

    1.2 Benchmark IT assets by examining your competitors’ Customer Service capabilities

    The availability of the internet means almost complete transparency between your products and services, and those of your competitors.

    Insights and implications from Customer Service

    How IT can help

    Competitor actions are crucial. Watch your competitors to learn how they use Customer Service as a competitive differentiator and a customer acquisition tool.

    Do not learn about a competitor’s actions because your customers are already switching to them. Track your competitors before getting a harsh surprise from your customers.

    View the customer service experience from the outside in. Assessing from the inside out gives an internal perspective on how good the service is, rather than what customers are experiencing.

    Take a data and analytics-driven approach to mine insights on what customers are saying about your competitors. Negative sentiment and specific complaints can be used as reference for IT and Customer Service to:

    • Avoid repeating the competitor’s mistakes.
    • Utilize sentiment as a benchmark for goal setting and improvements.
    • Duplicate successful technology initiatives to realize business value.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Look to your competitors for comparative models but do not pursue to solely replicate what they currently have. Aim higher and attempt to surpass their capabilities and brand value.

    1.2 Collaborate with Customer Service to understand customer value segments

    Let segmentation help you gain intelligence on customers’ expectations.

    Insights and implications from customer service

    • Segment your customers based on their value relative to the cost to serve. The easiest way to do so is with channel preference categorization.
    • If the cost for retention attempts are higher than the value that those customers provide, there is little business case to pursue retention action.

    How IT can help

    • Couple value-based segmentation with channel preference and satisfaction levels of your most-valued customers to effectively target IT investments in channels that maximize service customization and quality.
    • Correlate the customers’ channel and technology usage with their business value to see which IT assets are delivering on their investments.

    The image contains a screenshot of a graph to demonstrate the relationship between cost of retention and value.

    “If you're developing a Customer Service strategy, it has to start with who your clients are, what [they are] trying to do, and through what channels […] and then your decision around processes have to fall out of that. If IT is trying to lead the conversation, or bring people together to lead the conversation, then marketing and whoever does segmentation has to be at the table as a huge component of this.”

    Lisa Woznica, Director of Client Experience, BMO Financial Group

    1.2 Be mindful of trends in the consumer and technology landscape

    Building a future vision of customer service requires knowing what upcoming technologies can aid the organization.

    OMNICHANNEL SUPPORT

    Rapidly changing demographics and modes of communication requires an evolution toward omnichannel engagement. 63% of customers now expect to communicate with contact centers over their social media (Ringshall 2020). Agents need customer information synced across each channel they use, meeting the customer’s needs where they are.

    INTELLIGENT SELF-SERVICE PORTALS

    Customers want their issues resolved as quickly as possible. Machine learning self-service options deliver personalized customer experiences, which also reduce both agent call volume and support costs for the organization. 60% of contact centers are using or plan to use AI in the next 12 months to improve their customer (Canam Research 2020).

    LEVERAGING ANALYTICS

    The future of customer service is tied up with analytics. This not only entails AI-driven capabilities that fetch the agent relevant information, but it finds skills-based routing and uses biometric data (e.g., speech) for security. It also feeds operations leaders’ need for easy access to real insights about how their customers and agents are doing.

    Phase 1 – Case Study

    Omnichannel support delivers a financial services firm immediate customer service results.

    INDUSTRY: Financial Services

    SOURCE: Mattsen Kumar

    Situation

    Solution

    Results

    • A financial services firm’s fast growth began to show cracks in their legacy customer service system.
    • Costs to support the number of customer queries increased.
    • There was a lack of visibility into incoming customer communications and their resolutions.
    • Business opportunities were lost due to a lack of information on customers’ preferences and challenges. Customer satisfaction was decreasing, negatively impacting the firm’s brand.
    • Mattsen Kumar diagnosed that the firm’s major issue was that their customer service processes required a high percentage of manual interventions.
    • Mattsen Kumar developed an omnichannel strategy, including a mix of social channels joined together by a CRM.
    • A key aspect of this omnichannel experience was designing automated processes with minimal manual intervention.
    • 25% reduction in callbacks from customers.
    • $50,000 reduction in operational costs.
    • Two minutes wait time reduction for chat process.
    • 14% decrease in average handle time.
    • Scaled up from 6000 to 50,000 monthly calls that could be handled by the current team.
    • Enabled more than 10,000 customer queries over chats.

    1.2 Construct your future state using a business process management approach

    Documenting and evaluating your business processes serves as a good starting point for defining the overall Customer Service strategy.

    • Examining key Customer Service business processes can unlock clues around the following:
      • Driving operational effectiveness.
      • Identifying, implementing, and maintaining reusable enterprise systems.
      • Identifying gaps that can be addressed by acquisition of additional systems.
    • Business process modeling facilitates the collaboration between business and IT, recording the sequence of events, tasks performed, by whom they are performed, and the levels of interaction with the various supporting applications.
    • By identifying the events and decision points in the process, and overlaying the people that perform the functions and technologies that support them, organizations are better positioned to identify gaps that need to be bridged.
    • Encourage the analysis by compiling the inventory of Customer Service business processes that are relevant to the organization.

    Info-Tech Insight

    A process-oriented approach helps organizations see the complete view of the system by linking strategic requirements to business requirements, and business requirements to system requirements.

    1.2 Use the APQC Framework to define your Customer Service-related processes

    • APQC’s Process Classification Framework (PCF) is a taxonomy of cross-functional business processes intended to allow the objective comparison of organizational performance within and among organizations.
    • Section 5 of the PCF details various levels of Customer Service business processes, useful for mapping on to your own organization’s current state.
    • The APQC Framework can be accessed through the following link: APQC’s Process Classification Framework.

    The APQC Framework serves as a high-level, industry-neutral enterprise model that allows organizations to see activities from a cross-industry process perspective.

    The image contains a screenshot example of the APQC Process Classification Framework.
    Source: (Ziemba and Eisenbardt 2015)

    Info-Tech Caution

    The APQC framework does not list all processes within a specific organization, nor are the processes which are listed in the framework present in every organization. It is designed as a framework and global standard to be customized for use in any organization.

    1.2 Each APQC process has five levels that represent its logical components

    The image contains a screenshot of the APQC five levels. The levels include: category, process group, process, and activity.

    The PCF provides L1 through 4 for the Customer Service Framework.

    L5 processes are task- and industry-specific and need to be defined by the organization.

    Source: (APQC 2020)
    This Industry Process Classification Framework was jointly developed by APQC and IBM to facilitate improvement through process management and benchmarking. ©2018 APQC and IBM. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

    1.2a Begin documenting business processes

    4 hours

    1. Using Info-Tech’s Customer Service Business Process Shortlisting Tool, list the Customer Service goals and rank them by importance.
    2. Score the APQC L4 processes by relevance to the defined goals and perceived satisfaction index.
    3. Define the L5 processes for the top scoring L4 process.
    4. Leave Tab 5, Columns G – I for now. These columns will be revisited in activities 1.2b and 2.1a.
    The image contains a screenshot of the Customer Service Process Shortlisting Tool.

    Input

    Output

    • List of Customer Service goals
    • A detailed prioritization of Customer Service business processes to model for future states

    Materials

    Participants

    • Whiteboard
    • Writing materials
    • Customer Service Business Process Shortlisting Tool
    • Applications Director
    • Customer Service Director
    • IT and Customer Service Representatives

    Download the Customer Service Business Process Shortlisting Tool

    1.2 Start designing the future state of key business processes

    If Customer Service transformation is called for, start with your future-state vision. Don’t get stuck in current state and the “art of the possible” within its context.

    Future-State Analysis

    Start by designing your future state business processes (based on the key processes shortlisting exercise). Design these processes as they would exist as your “ideal scenario.” Next, analyze your current state to help better your understanding of:

    • The gaps that exist and must be bridged to achieve the future-state vision.
    • Whether or not any critical functions that support your business were omitted accidentally from the future-state processes.
    • Whether or not any of the supporting applications or architecture can be salvaged and used toward delivery of your future-state vision.

    Though it’s a commonly used approach, documenting your current-state business processes first can have several drawbacks:

    • Current-state analysis can impede your ability to see future possibility.
    • Teams will spend a great deal of time and effort on documenting current state and inevitably succumb to “analysis paralysis.”
    • Current state assessment, when done first, limits the development of the future (or target) state, constraining thinking to the limitations of the current environment rather than the requirements of the business strategy.

    Current-State Analysis

    “If you're fairly immature and looking for a paradigm shift or different approach [because] you recognize you're totally doing it wrong today, then starting with documenting current state doesn't do a lot except make you sad. You don't want to get stuck in [the mindset of] ‘Here's the current state, and here’s the art of the possible.’”

    Trevor Timbeck, Executive Coach, Parachute Executive Coaching

    1.2 Start modeling future-state processes

    Build buy-in and accountability in process owners through workshops and whiteboarding – either in-person or remotely.

    Getting consensus on the process definition (who does what, when, where, why, and how) is one of the hardest parts of BPM.

    Gathering process owners for a process-defining workshop isn’t easy. Getting them to cooperate can be even harder. To help manage these difficulties during the workshop, make sure to:

    • Keep the scope contained to the processes being defined in order to make best use of everyone’s time, as taking time away from employees is a cost too.
    • Prior to the workshop, gather information about the processes with interviews, questionnaires, and/or system data gathering and analysis.
    • Use the information gathered to have real-life examples of the processes in question so that time isn’t wasted.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Keep meetings short and on task as tangents are inevitable. Set ground rules at the beginning of any brainstorming or whiteboarding session to ensure that all participants are aligned.

    1.2 Use the five W’s to help map out your future-state processes

    Define the “who, what, why, where, when, and how” of the process to gain a better understanding of individual activities.

    Owner

    Who

    What

    When

    Where

    Why

    How

    Record Claim

    Customer Service

    Customer Service Rep.

    Claim

    Accident

    Claims system

    Customer notification

    Agent enters claim into the system and notifies claims department

    Manage Claim

    Claims Department

    Claims Clerk

    Claim

    Agent submitted the claim

    Claims system

    Agent notification

    Clerk enters claim into the claims system

    Investigate Claim

    Claims Investigation

    Adjuster

    Claim

    Claim notification

    Property where claim is being made

    Assess damage

    Evaluation and expert input

    Settle Claim

    Claims Department

    Claim Approver

    Claim and Adjuster’s evaluation

    Receipt of Adjuster’s report

    Claims system

    Evaluation

    Approval or denial

    Administer Claim

    Finance Department

    Finance Clerk

    Claim amount

    Claim approval notification

    Finance system

    Payment required

    Create payment voucher and cut check

    Close Claim

    Claims Department

    Claims Clerk

    Claim and all supporting documentation

    Payment issued

    Claims system

    Claim processed

    Close the claim in the system

    Info-Tech Insight

    It’s not just about your internal processes. To achieve higher customer retention and satisfaction, it’s also useful to map the customer service process from the customer perspective to identify customer pain points and disconnects.

    1.2 Use existing in-house software as a simplistic entry point to process modeling

    A diagramming tool like Visio enables you to plot process participants and actions using dedicated symbols and connectors that indicate causality.

    • Models can use a stick-figure format, a cross-functional workflow format, or BPMN notation.
    • Plot the key activities and decision points in the process using standard flowcharting shapes. Identify the data that belongs to each step in a separate document or as call-outs on the diagram.
    • Document the flow control between steps, i.e., what causes one step to finish and another to start?

    The image contains a screenshot of the sample cross-functional diagram using the claims process.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Diagramming tools can force the process designer into a specific layout: linear or cross-functional/swim lane.

    • A linear format is recommended for single function and system processes.
    • A swim lane format is recommended for cross-functional and cross-departmental processes.

    1.2 Introduce low investment alternatives for process modeling for modeling disciplines

    SaaS and low-cost modeling tools are emerging to help organizations with low to medium BPM maturity visualize their processes.

    • Formal modeling tools allow a designer to model in any view and easily switch to other views to gain new perspectives on the process.
    • Subscription-based, best-of-breed SaaS tools provide scalable and flexible process modeling capabilities.
    • Open source and lower cost tools also exist to help distribute BPM modeling discipline and standards.
    • BPMS suites incorporate advanced modeling tools with process execution engines for end-to-end business process management. Integrate process discovery with modeling, process simulation, and analysis. Deploy, monitor, and measure process models in process automation engines.

    The image contains a screenshot of a diagram of the claims process.

    Explore SoftwareReviews’ Business Process Management market analysis by clicking here.

    1.2b Model future state business processes

    4 hours

    1. Model the future state of the most critical business processes.
    2. Use Tab 5, Columns G – H of Info-Tech’s Customer Service Business Process Shortlisting Tool to keep stock of what processes are targeted for modeling, and whether the models have been completed.
    The image contains a screenshot of the Customer Service Business Process Shortlisting Tool.

    Input

    Output

    • Modeled future Customer Service business processes
    • An inventory of modeled future states for critical Customer Service business processes

    Materials

    Participants

    • Whiteboard
    • Writing materials
    • Customer Service Business Process Shortlisting Tool
    • Applications Director
    • Customer Service Director

    Download the Customer Service Business Process Shortlisting Tool

    1.3 Start a preliminary inventory of your requirements

    Use the future state business process models as a source for software requirements.

    • Business process modeling deals with business requirements that can be used as the foundation for elicitation of system (functional and non-functional) requirements.
    • Modeling creates an understanding of the various steps and transfers in each business process, as well as the inputs and outputs of the process.
    • The future state models form an understanding of what information is needed and how it flows from one point to another in each process.
    • Understand what technologies are (or can be) leveraged to facilitate the exchange of information and facilitate the process.

    For each task or event in the process, ask the following questions:

    • What is the input?
    • What is the output?
    • What are the underlying risks and how can they be mitigated?
    • What conditions should be met to mitigate or eliminate each risk?
    • What are the improvement opportunities?
    • What conditions should be met to enable these opportunities?

    Info-Tech Insight

    Incorporate future considerations into the requirements. How will the system need to adapt over time to accommodate additional processes, process variations, introduction of additional channels and capabilities, etc. Do not overreach by identifying system capabilities that cannot possibly be met.

    1.3 Understand the four different requirements to document

    Have a holistic view for capturing the various requirements the organization has for a Customer Service strategy.

    Business requirements

    High-level requirements that management would typically understand.

    User requirements

    High-level requirements on how the tool should empower users’ lives.

    Non-functional requirements

    Criteria that can be used to judge the operation of a contact center. It defines how the system should perform for the organization.

    Functional requirements

    Outline the technical requirements for the desired contact center.

    1.3 Extract requirements from the business process models

    To see how, let us examine our earlier example for the Claims Process, extracting requirements from the “Record Claim” task.

    The image contains an example of the claims process, and focuses on the record claim task.

    1.3a Document your preliminary requirements

    4 hours

    1. The Applications Director and Customer Service Head are to identify participants based on the business processes that will be reviewed.
    2. They are to conduct a workshop to gather all requirements that can be taken from the business process models.
    3. Use Tab 4 of Info-Tech’s Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool to document your preliminary requirements.
    The image contains a screenshot of the Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool.
    InputOutput
    • Half-day workshop to review the proposed future-state diagrams and distill from them the business, functional, and non-functional requirements
    • Future state business process models from activities 1.2a and 1.2b
    • An inventory of preliminary requirements for modeled future states
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Whiteboard
    • Writing materials
    • Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool
    • Results of activities 1.2a and 1.2b
    • Applications Director
    • Customer Service Director
    • IT and Customer Service Representatives

    Download the Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool

    Phase 2

    Evaluate Current State

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    Phase 3

    1.1 Structure the Project

    1.2 Define Vision for Future State

    1.3 Document Preliminary Requirements

    2.1 Document Current State Business Processes

    2.2 Assess Current State Architecture

    2.3 Review and Finalize Requirements for Future State

    3.1 Evaluate Architectural and Application Options

    3.2 Understand the Marketplace

    3.3 Score and Plot Initiatives Along Strategic Roadmap

    This phase will guide you through the following activities:

    2.1a Model current-state business processes for an inventory to compare against future-state models.

    2.1b Compare future and current business states for a preliminary gap analysis.

    2.1c Begin compiling an inventory of CS Systems by function for an overview of your current state map.

    2.2a Rate your functional and integration quality to assess the performance of your application portfolio.

    2.3a Compare states and propose action to bridge current business processes with viable future alternatives.

    2.3b Document finalized requirements, ready to enact change.

    Participants required for Phase 2:

    • Applications Director
    • Customer Service Director
    • IT and Customer Service Representatives
    • IT Managers

    2.1 Document the current state of your key business processes

    Doing so will solidify your understanding of the gaps, help identify any accidental omissions from the future state vision, and provide clues as to what can be salvaged.

    • Analysis of the current state is important in the context of gap analysis. It aids in understanding the discrepancies between your baseline and the future-state vision, and ensuring that these gaps are recorded as part of the overall requirements.
    • By analyzing the current state of key business processes, you may identify critical functions that are in place today that were not taken into consideration during the future-state business process visioning exercise.
    • By overlaying the current state process models with the applications that support them, the current state models will indicate what systems and interfaces can be salvaged.
    • The baseline feeds the business case, allowing the team to establish proposed benefits and improvements from implementing the future-state vision. Seek to understand the following:
      • The volumes of work
      • Major exceptions
      • Number of employees involved
      • Amount of time spent in each area of the process

    2.1 Assess the current state to drive the gap analysis

    Before you choose any solution, identify what needs to be done to your current state in order to achieve the vision you have defined.

    • By beginning with the future state in mind, you have likely already envisioned some potential solutions.
    • By reviewing your current situation in contrast with your desired future state, you can deliberate what needs to be done to bridge the gap. The differences between the models allow you to define a set of changes that must be enacted in sequence or in parallel. These represent the gaps.
    • The gaps, once identified, translate themselves into additional requirements.

    Assessment Example

    Future State

    Current Situation

    Next Actions/ Proposals

    Incorporate social channels for responding to customer inquiries.

    No social media monitoring or channels for interaction exist at present.

    1. Implement a social media monitoring platform tool and integrate it with the current CSM.
    2. Recruit additional Customer Service representatives to monitor and respond to inquiries via social channels.
    3. Develop report(s) for analyzing volumes of inquiries received through social channels.

    Info-Tech Insight

    It is important to allot time for the current-state analysis, confine it to the minimum effort required to understand the gaps, and identify any missing pieces from your future-state vision. Make sure the work expended is proportional to the benefit derived from this exercise.

    2.1a Model current-state business processes

    2 hours

    1. Model the current state of the most critical business processes, using the work done in activities 1.2a and 1.2b to help identify these processes.
    2. Use Tab 5, Column I of Info-Tech’s Customer Service Business Process Shortlisting Tool to keep stock of what models have been completed.
    3. This tool is now complete.
    The image contains a screenshot of the Customer Service Business Process Shortlisting Tool.
    InputOutput
    • Modeled current-state Customer Service business processes
    • An inventory of modeled current states for critical Customer Service business processes
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Whiteboard
    • Writing materials
    • Customer Service Business Process Shortlisting Tool
    • Results of activities 1.2a and 1.2b.
    • Applications Director
    • Customer Service Director

    Download the Customer Service Business Process Shortlisting Tool

    2.1b Compare future and current business states

    2 hours

    1. Use Tab 9 of Info-Tech’s Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool to record a summary of the future state, current state, and actions proposed in order to bridge the gaps.
      • Fill out the desired future state of the business processes and IT architecture.
      • Fill out the current state of the business processes and IT architecture.
      • Fill out the actions required to mitigate the gaps between the future and current state.
    The image contains a screenshot of thr Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool.
    InputOutput
    • The results of activities 1.2a, 1.2b, and 2.1a.
    • Modeled future- and current-state business processes
    • An overview and analysis of how to reach certain future states from the current state.
    • A preliminary list of next steps through bridging the gap between current and future states.
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Whiteboard
    • Writing materials
    • Customer Service Business Process Shortlisting Tool
    • Applications Director
    • Customer Service Director

    Download the Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool

    2.1 Assess whether Customer Service architecture can meet future-state vision

    Approach your CS systems holistically to identify opportunities for system architecture optimization.

    • Organizations often do not have a holistic view of their Customer Service systems. These systems are often cobbled together from disparate parts, such as:
      • Point solutions (both SaaS and on-premise).
      • Custom interfaces between applications and databases.
      • Spreadsheets and other manual workarounds.
    • A high degree of interaction between multiple systems can cause distention in the application portfolio and databases, creating room for error and more work for CS and IT staff. Mapping your systems and architectural landscape can help you:
      • Identify the number of manual processes you currently employ.
      • Eliminate redundancies.
      • Allow for consolidation and/or integration.

    Consider the following metrics when tracking your CS systems:

    Time needed to perform core tasks (i.e., resolving a customer complaint)

    Accuracy of basic information (customer history, customer product portfolio)

    CSR time spent on manual process/workarounds

    Info-Tech Insight

    There is a two-step process to document the current state of your Customer Service systems:

    1. Compile an inventory of systems by function
    2. Identify points of integration across systems

    2.1c Begin compiling an inventory of CS systems by function

    2 hours

    1. Using Tab 2 of Info-Tech’s Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool, request that the CS managers fill in the application inventory template with all the CS systems that they use.
    2. Questions to trigger exercise:
      • Which applications am I using?
      • Which CS function does the application support?
      • How many applications support the same function?
      • What spreadsheets or manual workarounds do I use to fill in system gaps?
    3. Send the filled-in template to IT Managers to validate and fill in missing system information.
    InputOutput
    • Applications Directors’ knowledge of the current state
    • IT Managers’ validation of this state
    • A corroborated inventory of the current state for Customer Service systems
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool
    • Applications Director
    • IT managers

    Download the Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool

    2.1 Use activity 2.1c for an overview of your current state map

    The image contains a screenshot of activity 2.1.

    Info-Tech Insight

    A current-state map of CS systems can offer insight on:

    • Coverage, i.e. whether all functional areas are supported by systems.
    • Redundancies, i.e. functional areas with multiple systems. If a customer’s records are spread across multiple systems, it may be difficult to obtain a single source of truth.

    2.2 Assess current state with user interface architecture diagrams

    Understand a high-level overview of how your current state integrates together to rate its overall quality.

    • If IT already has an architecture diagram, use this in conjunction with your application inventory for the basis of current state discussions.
    • If your organization does not already have an architecture diagram for review and discussion, consider creating one in its most simplistic form using the following guidelines (see illustrative example on next slide):

    Represent each of your systems as a labelled shape with a unique number (this number can be referenced in other artifacts that can provide more detail).

    Color coding can also be applied to differentiate these objects, e.g., to indicate an internal system (where development is owned by your organization) vs. an external system (where development is outside of your organization’s control).

    2.2 Example: Current state with user interface architecture diagrams

    The image contains a screenshot of an example of current state with user interface architecture diagrams.

    2.2 Evaluate application functionality and functional coverage

    Use this documentation of the current state as an opportunity to spot areas for rationalizing your application portfolio.

    If an application is well-received by the organization and is an overall good platform, consider acquiring more modules from the same vendor application.

    The image contains a screenshot of a diagram to demonstrate functionality and functional coverage.

    If you have more than one application for a function, consider why that is and how you might consolidate into a single application.

    Measure the effectiveness of applications under consideration. For example, consider the number of failures when an application attempts a function (by ticket numbers), and overall satisfaction/ease of use.

    The above steps will reveal capability overlaps and application pain points and show how the overall portfolio could be made more efficient.

    2.2 Determine the degree of integration between systems

    Data and system integration are key components of an effective CS system portfolio.

    The needed level of integration will depend on three major factors:

    Integration between systems helps facilitate reporting. The required reports will vary from organization to organization:

    How many other systems benefit from the data of the application?

    Large workforces will benefit from more detailed WFM reports for optimizing workforce planning and talent acquisition.

    Will automating the integration between systems alleviate a significant amount of manual effort?

    Organizations with competitive sales and incentives will want to strategize around talent management and compensation.

    What kind of reports will your organization require in order to perform core and business-enabling functions?

    Aging workforces or organizations with highly specialized skills can benefit from detailed analysis around succession planning.

    Phase 2 – Case Study

    Integrating customer relationship information streamlines customer service and increases ROI for the organization.

    INDUSTRY: Retail and Wholesale

    SOURCE: inContact

    Situation

    Solution

    Results

    • Hall Automotive – a group of 14 multi-franchise auto dealerships located throughout Virginia and North Carolina – had customer information segmented throughout their CRM system at each dealership.
    • Call center agents lacked the technology to synthesize this information, leading customers to receive multiple and unrelated service calls.
    • Hall Automotive wanted to avoid embarrassing information gaps, integrate multiple CRM systems, and help agents focus on customers.
    • Hall Automotive utilized an inContact solution that included Automated Call Distributor, Computer Telephony Integration, and IVR technologies.
    • This created a complete customer-centric system that interfaced with multiple CRM and back-office systems.
    • The inContact solution simplified intelligent call flows, routed contacts to the right agent, and provided comprehensive customer information.
    • Call time decreased from five minutes to one minute and 23 seconds.
    • 350% increase in production.
    • Market response time down from three months to one day.
    • Cost per call cut from 83 cents to 23 cents.
    • Increased agents’ calls-per-hour from 12 to 43.
    • Scalability matched seasonal fluctuations in sales.

    2.2a Rate your functional and integration quality

    2 hours

    1. Using Tab 5 of Info-Tech’s Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool, evaluate the functionality of your applications.
    2. Then, use Tab 6 of the Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool to evaluate the integration of your applications.
    The image contains screenshots of the Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool.
    InputOutput
    • Applications Directors’ knowledge of the current state
    • IT Managers’ validation of this state
    • A documented evaluation of the organization’s application portfolio regarding functional and integration quality
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool
    • Applications Director
    • IT managers

    Download the Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool

    2.3 Revisit and refine the future-state business processes and list of requirements

    With a better understanding of the current state, determine whether the future-state models hold up. Ensure that the requirements are updated accordingly to reflect the full set of gaps identified.

    • Future-state versus current-state modeling is an iterative process.
    • By assessing the gaps between target state and current state, you may decide that:
      • The future state model was overly ambitious for what can reasonably be delivered in the near-term.
      • Core functions that exist today were accidentally omitted from the future state models and need to be incorporated.
      • There are systems or processes that your organization would like to salvage, and they must be worked into the future-state model.
    • Once the future state vision is stabilized, ensure that all gaps have been translated into business requirements.
      • If possible, categorize all gaps by functional and non-functional requirements.

    2.3a Compare states and propose action

    3 hours

    • Revisit Tab 9 of Info-Tech’s Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool to more accurately compare your organization’s current- and future-state business processes.
    • Ensure that gaps in the system architecture have been captured.
    The image contains a screenshot of the Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool.
    InputOutput
    • Modeled future- and current-state business processes
    • Refined and prioritized list of requirements
    • An accurate list of action steps for bridging current and future state business processes
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Whiteboard
    • Writing materials
    • Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool
    • Applications Director
    • IT managers

    Download the Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool

    2.3 Prioritize and finalize the requirements

    Prioritizing requirements will help to itemize initiatives and the timing with which they need to occur.

    Requirements are to be prioritized based on relative important and the timing of the respective initiatives.

    Prioritize the full set of requirements by assigning a priority to each:

    1. High/Critical: A critical requirement; without it, the product is not acceptable to the stakeholders.
    2. Medium/Important: A necessary but deferrable requirement that makes the product less usable but still functional.
    3. Low/Desirable: A nice feature to have if there are resources, but the product can function well without it.

    Requirements prioritization must be completed in collaboration with all key stakeholders (business and IT).

    Consider the following criteria when assigning the priority:

    • Business value
    • Business or technical risk
    • Implementation difficulty
    • Likelihood of success
    • Regulatory compliance
    • Relationship to other requirements
    • Urgency
    • Unified stakeholder agreement

    Stakeholders must ask themselves:

    • What are the consequences to the business objectives if this requirement is omitted?
    • Is there an existing system or manual process/workaround that could compensate for it?
    • Why can’t this requirement be deferred to the next release?
    • What business risk is being introduced if a particular requirement cannot be implemented right away?

    2.3b Document finalized requirements

    4 hours

    1. Using Tab 4 of Info-Tech’s Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool, evaluate your applications’ functionality, review, refine, prioritize, and finalize your requirements.
    2. Review the proposed future state diagrams in activity 2.3a and distill from them the business, functional, and non-functional requirements.
    3. The Applications Director and Customer Service Head are to identify participants based on the business processes that will be reviewed. They are to conduct a workshop to gather all the requirements that can be taken from the business process models.
    The image contains a screenshot of the Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool.
    InputOutput
    • Modeled future- and current-state business processes
    • Refined and prioritized list of requirements
    • A documented finalized list of requirements to achieve future state business processes
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Whiteboard
    • Writing materials
    • Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool
    • IT Applications Director
    • Customer Service Director
    • IT and Customer Service Representatives

    Download the Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool

    Phase 3

    Build Roadmap to Future State

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    Phase 3

    1.1 Structure the Project

    1.2 Define Vision for Future State

    1.3 Document Preliminary Requirements

    2.1 Document Current State Business Processes

    2.2 Assess Current State Architecture

    2.3 Review and Finalize Requirements for Future State

    3.1 Evaluate Architectural and Application Options

    3.2 Understand the Marketplace

    3.3 Score and Plot Initiatives Along Strategic Roadmap

    This phase will guide you through the following activities:

    3.1a Analyze future architectural posture to understand how applications within the organization ought to be arranged.

    3.3a Develop a Customer Service IT Systems initiative roadmap to reach your future state.

    Participants required for Phase 3:

    • Applications Director
    • CIO
    • Customer Service Director
    • Customer Service Head
    • IT and Customer Service Representatives
    • IT Applications Director

    3.1a Analyze future architectural posture

    1 hour

    Review Tab 8 of the Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool.

    This tab plots each system that supports Customer Service on a 2x2 framework based on its functionality and integration scores. Where these systems plot on each 2x2 provides clues as to whether they should be considered for retention, functional enhancement (upgrade), increased system integration, or replacement.

    • Integrate: The application is functionally rich, so integrate it with other modules by building or enhancing interfaces.
    • Retain: The application satisfies both functionality and integration requirements, so it should be considered for retention.
    • Replace: The application neither offers the functionality sought, nor is it integrated with other modules.
    • Replace/Enhance: The module offers poor functionality but is well integrated with other modules. If enhancing for functionality is easy (e.g., through configuration or custom development), consider enhancement or replace it altogether.
    The image contains a screenshot of tab 8 of the Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool.
    InputOutput
    • Review Tab 8 of the Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool
    • An overview of how different applications in the organization ought to be assessed
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool
    • IT Applications Director
    • Customer Service Director
    • IT and Customer Service Representatives

    Download the Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool

    3.1 Interpret 3.1a’s results for next steps

    Involving both sales and marketing in these discussions will provide a 360-degree view on what the modifications should accomplish.

    If the majority of applications are plotted in the “Integrate” quadrant:

    The applications are performing well in terms of functionality but have poor integration. Determine what improvements can be made to enhance integration between the systems where required (e.g. re-working existing interfaces to accommodate additional data elements, automating interfaces, or creating brand new custom interfaces where warranted).

    If the applications are spread across “Integrate,” “Retain,” and “Replace/Enhance”:

    There is no clear recommended direction in this case. Weigh the effort required to replace/enhance/integrate specific applications critical for supporting processes. If resource usage for piecemeal solutions is too high, consider replacement with suite.

    If the majority of applications are plotted in the “Retain” quadrant:

    All applications satisfy both functionality and integration requirements. There is no evidence that significant action is required.

    If the application placements are split between the “Retain” and “Replace/Enhance” quadrants:

    Consider whether or not IT has the capabilities to execute application replacement procedures. If considering replacement, consider the downstream impact on applications that the system in question is currently integrated with. Enhancing an application usually implies upgrading or adding a module to an existing application. Consider the current satisfaction with the application vendor and whether the upgrade or additional module will satisfy your customer service needs.

    3.1 Work through architectural considerations to narrow future states

    Best-of-breeds vs. suite

    Integration and consolidation

    Deployment

    Does the organization only need a point solution or an entire platform of solutions?

    Does the current state enable interoperability between software? Is there room for rationalization?

    Should any new software be SaaS-based, on-premises, or a hybrid?

    Info-Tech Insight

    Decommissioning and replacing entire applications can put well-functioning modules at risk. Make sure to drill down into the granular features to assess if the feature level performance prompts change. The goal is to make the architecture more efficient for Customer Service and easier to manage for IT. If integration has been chosen as a course of action, make sure that the spend on resources and effort is less than that on system replacement. Also make sure that the intended architecture streamlines usability for agents.

    3.1 Considerations: Best-of-breeds vs. suite

    If requirements extend beyond the capabilities of a best-of-breed solution, a suite of tools may be required.

    Best-of-breed

    Suite

    Benefits

    • Features may be more advanced for specific functional areas and a higher degree of customization may be possible.
    • If a potential delay in real-time customer data transfer is acceptable, best-of-breeds provide a similar level of functionality to suites for a lower price.
    • Best-of-breeds allow value to be realized faster than suites, as they are easier and faster to implement and configure.
    • Rip and replace is easier and vendor updates are relatively quick to market.

    Benefits

    • Everyone in the organization works from the same set of customer data.
    • There is a “lowest common denominator” for agent learning as consistent user interfaces lower learning curves and increase efficiency in usage.
    • There is a broader range of functionality using modules.
    • Integration between functional areas will be strong and the organization will be in a better position to enable version upgrades without risking invalidation of an integration point between separate systems.

    Challenges

    • Best-of-breeds typically cover less breadth of functionality than suites.
    • There is a lack of uniformity in user experience across best-of-breeds.
    • Data integrity risks are higher.
    • Variable infrastructure may be implemented due to multiple disparate systems, which adds to architecture complexity and increased maintenance.
    • There is potential for redundant functionality across multiple best-of-breeds.

    Challenges

    • Suites exhibit significantly higher costs compared to point solutions.
    • Suite module functionality may not have the same depth as point solutions.
    • Due to high configuration availability and larger-scale implementation requirements, the time to deploy is longer than point solutions.

    3.1 Considerations: Integration and consolidation

    Use Tab 7 of Info-Tech’s Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool to gauge the need for consolidation.

    IT benefits

    • Decreased spend on infrastructure, application acquisition, and development.
    • Reduced complexity in vendor management.
    • Less resources and effort spent on internal integration and functional customization.

    Customer Service benefits

    • Reduced user confusion and application usage efficiency.
    • Increased operational visibility and ease process mapping.
    • Improved data management and integrity.

    Theoretical scenarios and recommendations

    The image contains a screenshot of an example of a customer service functional purpose.

    Problem:

    • Large Redundancy – multiple applications address the same function, but one application performs better than others.

    Recommendation:

    • Consolidate the functions into Application 1 and consider decommissioning Applications 2 to 4.
    The image contains a screenshot of an example of a customer service functional purpose.

    Problem:

    • Large Redundancy – multiple applications address the same function, but none of them do it well.

    Recommendation:

    • None of the applications perform well in functional support. Consider replacing with suite or leveraging the Application 3 vendor for functional module expansion, if feasible.

    3.1 Considerations: Deployment

    SaaS is typically recommended as it reduces IT support needs. However, customization limitations and higher long-term TCO values continue to be a challenge for SaaS.

    On-premises deployment

    Hybrid deployment

    Public cloud deployment

    Benefits

    • Solution and deployment are highly customizable.
    • There are fewer compliance and security risks because customer data is kept on premises.

    Challenges

    • There is slower physical deployment.
    • Physical hardware and software are required.
    • There are higher upfront costs.

    Benefits

    • Pick-and-mix which aspects to keep on premises and which to outsource.
    • Benefits of scaling and flexibility for outsourced solution.

    Challenges

    • Expensive to maintain.
    • Requires in-house skillset for on-premises option.
    • Some control is lost over outsourced customization.

    Benefits

    • Physical hardware is not required.
    • There is rapid deployment, vendor managed product updates, and server maintenance.
    • There are lower upfront costs.

    Challenges

    • There is higher TCO over time.
    • There are perceived security risks.
    • There are service availability and reliability risks.
    • There is limited customization.

    3.1 Considerations: Public cloud deployment

    Functionality is only one aspect of a broader range of issues to narrow down the viability of a cloud-based architecture.

    Security/Privacy Concerns:

    Whether the data is stored on premise or in the cloud, it is never 100% safe. The risk increases with a multi-tenant cloud solution where a single vendor manages the data of multiple clients. If your data is particularly sensitive, heavily scrutinize the security infrastructure of potential vendors or store the data internally if internal security is deemed stronger than that of a vendor.

    Location:

    If there are individuals that need to access the system database and work in different locations, centralizing the system and its database in the cloud may be an effective approach.

    Compatibility:

    Assess the compatibility of the cloud solutions with your internal IT systems. Cloud solutions should be well-integrated with internal systems for data flow to ensure efficiency in service operations.

    Cost/Budget Constraints:

    SaaS allows conversion of up-front CapEx to periodic OpEx. It assists in bolstering a business case as costs in the short-run are much more manageable. On-premise solutions have a much higher upfront TCO than cloud solutions. However, the TCO for the long-term usage of cloud solutions under the licensing model will exceed that of an on-premise solution, especially with a growing business and user base.

    Functionality/Customization:

    Ensure that the function or feature that you need is available on the cloud solution market and that the feature is robust enough to meet service quality standards. If the available cloud solution does not support the processes that fit your future-state vision and gaps, it has little business value. If high levels of customization are required to meet functionality, the amount of effort and cost in dealing with the cloud vendor may outweigh the benefits.

    Maintenance/Downtime:

    For most organizations, lapses in cloud-service availability can become disastrous for customer satisfaction and service quality. Organizations should be prepared for potential outages since customers require constant access to customer support.

    3.2 Explore the customer service technology marketplace

    Your requirements, gap analysis, and assessment of current applications architecture may have prompted the need for a new solutions purchase.

    • Customer service technology has come a long way since PABX in 1960s call centers. Let Info-Tech give you a quick overview of the market and the major systems that revolve around Customer Service.
    • The image contains a screenshot of a timeline of the market and major systems that revolve  around customer service.

    Info-Tech Insight

    While Customer Relationships Management systems interlock several aspects of the customer journey, best-of-breed software for specific aspects of this journey could provide a better ROI if the organization’s coverage of these aspects are only “good enough” and need boosting.

    3.2 The CRM software market will continue to grow at an aggressive rate

    • In recent years, CRM suite solutions have matured significantly in their customer support capabilities. Much of this can be attributed to their acquisitions of smaller best-of-breed Customer Service vendors.
    • Many of the larger CRM solutions (like those offered by Salesforce) have now added social media engagement, knowledge bases, and multi-channel capabilities into their foundational offering.
    • CRM systems are capable of huge sophistication and integration with the core ERP, but they also have heavy license and implementation costs, and therefore may not be for everyone.
    • In some cases, customers are looking to augment upon very specific capabilities that are lacking from their customer service foundation. In these cases, best-of-breed solutions ought to be integrated with a CRM, ERP, or with one another through API integration.
    The image contains a screenshot of a graph that demonstrates the CRM global market growth, 2019-2027.

    3.2 Utilize SoftwareReviews to focus on which CS area needs enhancing

    Contact Center as a Service (CCaaS)

    Cloud-based customer experience solution that allows organizations to utilize a provider’s software to administer incoming support or inquiries from consumers in a hosted, subscription model.

    Customer Service Management (CSM)

    Supports an organization's interaction with current and potential customers. It uses data-driven tools designed to help organizations drive sales and deliver exceptional customer experiences.

    Customer Intelligence Platform

    Gather and analyze data from both structured and unstructured sources regarding your customers, including their demographic/firmographic details and activities, to build deeper and more effective customer relationships and improve business outcomes.

    Enterprise Social Media Management

    Software for monitoring social media activity with the goal of gaining insight into user opinion and optimizing social media campaigns.

    Customer Relationship Management (CRM)

    Consists of applications designed to automate and manage the customer life cycle. CRM software optimizes customer data management, lead tracking, communication logging, and marketing campaigns.

    Virtual Assistants and Chatbots

    interactive applications that use Artificial Intelligence (AI) to engage in conversation via speech or text. These applications simulate human interaction by employing natural language input and feedback.

    3.2 SoftwareReviews’ data accelerates and improves the software selection process

    SoftwareReviews collects and analyzes detailed reviews on enterprise software from real users to give you an unprecedented view into the product and vendor before you buy.

    With SoftwareReviews:

    • Access premium reports to understand the marketspace of 193 software categories.
    • Compare vendors with SoftwareReviews’ Data Quadrant Reports.
    • Discover which vendors have better customer relations management with SoftwareReviews’ Emotional Footprint Reports.
    • Explore the Product Scorecards of single vendors for a detailed analysis of their software offerings.
    The image contains a screenshot of the Software Reviews offerings.

    3.2 Speak with category experts to dive deeper into the vendor landscape

    Fact-based reviews of business software from IT professionals.

    Product and category reports with state-of-the-art data visualization.

    Top-tier data quality backed by a rigorous quality assurance process.

    User-experience insight that reveals the intangibles of working with a vendor.

    CLICK HERE to access SoftwareReviews

    Comprehensive software reviews to make better IT decisions.

    We collect and analyze the most detailed reviews on enterprise software from real users to give you an unprecedented view into the product and vendor before you buy.

    SoftwareReviews is powered by Info-Tech.

    Technology coverage is a priority for Info-Tech, and SoftwareReviews provides the most comprehensive unbiased data on today’s technology. The insights of our expert analysts provide unparalleled support to our members at every step of their buying journey.

    3.2 Leverage Info-Tech’s Rapid Application Selection Framework

    Improve your key software selection metrics for best-of-breed customer service software.

    The image contains a screenshot of an example of Info-Tech's Rapid Application Selection Framework.

    A simple measurement of the number of days from intake to decision.

    Use our Project Satisfaction Tool to measure stakeholder project satisfaction.

    Use our Application Portfolio Assessment Tool annually to measure application satisfaction.

    Use our Contract Review Service to benchmark and optimize your technology spending.

    Learn more about Info-Tech’s The Rapid Application Selection Framework

    The Rapid Application Selection Framework (RASF) is best geared toward commodity and mid-tier enterprise applications

    Not all software selection projects are created equal – some are very small, some span the entire enterprise. To ensure that IT is using the right framework, understand the cost and complexity profile of the application you’re looking to select. The RASF approach is best for commodity and mid-tier enterprise applications; selecting complex applications is better handled by the methodology described in Implement a Proactive and Consistent Vendor Selection Process.

    RASF Methodology

    Commodity & Personal Applications

    • Simple, straightforward applications (think OneNote vs. Evernote)
    • Total application spend of up to $10,000; limited risk and complexity
    • Selection done as a single, rigorous, one-day session

    Complex Mid-Tier Applications

    • More differentiated, department-wide applications (Marketo vs. Pardot)
    • Total application spend of up to $100,000; medium risk and complexity
    • RASF approach done over the course of an intensive 40-hour engagement

    Consulting Engagement

    Enterprise Applications

    Sophisticated, enterprise-wide applications (Salesforce vs. Dynamics)

    Total application spend of over $100,000; high risk and complexity

    Info-Tech can assist with tailored, custom engagements

    3.3 Translate gathered requirements and gaps into project-based initiatives

    Identify initiatives that can address multiple requirements simultaneously.

    The Process

    • You now have a list of requirements from assessing business processes and the current Customer Service IT systems architecture.
    • With a viable architecture and application posture, you can now begin scoring and plotting key initiatives along a roadmap.
    • Group similar requirements into categories of need and formulate logical initiatives to fulfill the requirements.
    • Ensure that all requirements are related to business needs, measurable, sufficiently detailed, and prioritized, and identify initiatives that meet the requirements.

    Consider this case:

    Paul’s organization, a midsize consumer packaged goods retailer, needs to monitor social media for sentiment, use social analytics to gain intelligence, and receive and respond to inquiries made over Twitter.

    The initiative:

    Implement a social media management platform (SMMP): A SMMP is able to deliver on all of the above requirements. SMMPs are highly capable platforms that have social listening modules and allow costumer service representatives to post to and monitor social media.

    3.3 Prioritize your initiatives and plan the order of rollout

    Initiatives should not and cannot be tackled all at once. There are three key factors that dictate the prioritization of initiatives.

    1. Value
      • What is the monetary value/perceived business value?
      • Are there regulatory or security related impacts if the initiative is not undertaken?
      • What is the time to market and is it an easily achievable goal?
      • How well does it align with the strategic direction?
    2. Risk
      • How technically complex is it?
      • Does it impact existing business processes?
      • Are there ample resources and right skillsets to support it?
    3. Dependencies
      • What initiatives must be undertaken first?
      • Which subsequent initiatives will it support?

    Example scenario using Info-Tech’s Initiative Scoring and Roadmap Tool

    An electronics distributor wants to implement social media monitoring and response. Its existing CRM does not have robust channel management functions. The organization plans to replace its CRM in the future, but because of project size and impact and budgetary constraints, the replacement project has been scheduled to occur two years from now.

    • The SMMP solution proposed for implementation has a high perceived value and is low risk.
    • The CRM replacement has higher value, but also carries significantly more risk.
    • Option 1: Complete the CRM replacement first, and overlay the social media monitoring component afterward (as the SMMP must be integrated with the CRM).
    • Option 2: Seize the easily achievable nature of the SMMP initiative. Implement it now and plan to re-work the CRM integration later.
    The image contains a screenshot of an example scenario using Info-Tech's Initiative Scoring and Roadmap Tool.

    3.3a Develop a Customer Service IT Systems initiative roadmap

    1 hour

    • Complete the tool as a team during a one-hour meeting to collaborate and agree on criteria and weighting.
      1. Input initiative information.
      2. Determine value and risk evaluation criteria.
      3. Evaluate each initiative to determine its priority.
      4. Create a roadmap of prioritized initiatives.
    The image contains a screenshot of the Customer Service Initiative Scoring and Roadmap Tool.
    InputOutput
    • Input the initiative information including the start date, end date, owner, and dependencies
    • Adjust the evaluation criteria, i.e., the value and risk factors
    • A list of initiatives and a roadmap toward the organization’s future state of Customer Service IT Systems
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Customer Service Initiative Scoring and Roadmap Tool
    • Applications Director
    • CIO
    • Customer Service Head

    Download the Customer Service Initiative Scoring and Roadmap Tool

    Document and communicate the strategy

    Leverage the artifacts of this blueprint to summarize your findings and communicate the outcomes of the strategy project to the necessary stakeholders.

    Document Section

    Proposed Content

    Leverage the Following Artifacts

    Executive Summary

    • Introduction
    • The opportunity
    • The scope
    • The stakeholders
    • Project success measures

    Project Charter section:

    • 1.1 Project Overview
    • 1.2 Project Objectives
    • 1.3 Project Benefits
    • 2.0 Scope

    Project RACI Chart Tool:

    • Tab 3. Simplified Output
    The image contains screenshots from the Project Charter, and the RACI Chart Tool.

    Background

    • The project approach
    • Current situation overview
    • Results of the environmental scan

    Blueprint slides:

    • Info-Tech’s methodology to develop your IT Strategy for CS Systems
    The image contains a screenshot from the blueprint slides.

    Future-State Vision

    • Customer service goals
    • Future-state modeling findings

    Customer Service Business Process Shortlisting Tool:

    • Tab 2. Customer Service Goals
    • Tab 5. Level 5 Process Inventory

    Future State Business Process Models

    The image contains screenshots from the Customer Service Business Process Shortlisting Tool.

    Current Situation

    • Current-state modeling findings
    • Current-state architecture findings
    • Gap assessment
    • Requirements

    Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool:

    • Tab 2. Inventory of Applications
    • Tab 7. Systems Health Heat Map
    • Tab 8. Systems Health Dashboard
    • Tab 9. Future vs. Current State
    • Tab 4. Requirements Collection
    The image contains screenshots from the Customer Service Systems Strategy Tool.

    Summary of Recommendations

    • Optimization opportunities
    • New capabilities

    N/A

    IT Strategy Implementation Plan

    • Implementation plan
    • Business case

    Customer Service Initiative Scoring and Roadmap Tool:

    • Tab 2. CS Initiative Definition
    • Tab 4. CS Technology Roadmap
    The image contains screenshots from the Customer Service Initiative Scoring and Roadmap Tool.

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Develop an IT Strategy to Support Customer Service

    With ecommerce accelerating and customer expectations rising with it, organizations must have an IT strategy to support Customer Service.

    The deliverable you have produced from this blueprint provides a solution to this problem: a roadmap to a desired future state for how IT can ground an effective customer service engagement. From omnichannel to self-service, IT will be critical to enabling the tools required to digitally meet customer needs.

    Begin implementing your roadmap!

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

    Contact your account representative for more information.

    workshops@infotech.com

    1-888-670-8889

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Deliver a Customer Service Training Program to Your IT Department

    • One training session is not enough to make a change. Leaders must embed the habits, create a culture of engagement and positivity, provide continual coaching and development, regularly gather customer feedback, and seek ways to improve.

    Build a Chatbot Proof of Concept

    • When implemented effectively, chatbots can help save costs, generate new revenue, and ultimately increase customer satisfaction for both external- and internal-facing customers.

    The Rapid Application Selection Framework

    • Application selection is a critical activity for IT departments. Implement a repeatable, data-driven approach that accelerates application selection efforts.

    Bibliography (1/2)

    • Callzilla. "Software Maker Compares Call Center Companies, Switches to Callzilla After 6 Months of Results." Callzilla. N.d. Accessed: 4 Jul. 2022.
    • Cisco. “Transforming Customer Service.” Cisco. 2018. Accessed: 8 Feb. 2021.
    • Gottlieb, Giorgina. “The Importance of Data for Superior Customer Experience and Business Success.” Medium. 23 May 2019. Accessed: 8 Feb. 2021.
    • Grand View Research. “Customer Relationship Management Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Solution, By Deployment, By Enterprise Size, By End Use, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2020 – 2027.” Grand View Research. April 2020. Accessed: 17 Feb. 2021.
    • inContact. “Hall Automotive Accelerates Customer Relations with inContact.” inContact. N.d. Accessed: 8 Feb. 2021.
    • Kulbyte, Toma. “37 Customer Experience Statistics to Know in 2021.” Super Office. 4 Jan. 2021. Accessed: 5 Feb. 2021.
    • Kuligowski, Kiely. "11 Benefits of CRM Systems." Business News Daily. 29 Jun. 2022. Accessed: 4 Jul. 2022.
    • Mattsen Kumar. “Ominchannel Support Transforms Customer Experience for Leading Fintech Player in India.” Mattsen Kumar. 4 Apr. 2020. Accessed: 8 Feb. 2021.
    • Microsoft. “State of Global Customer Service Report.” Microsoft. Mar. 2019. Accessed: 8 Feb. 2021.
    • Ringshall, Ben. “Contact Center Trends 2020: A New Age for the Contact Center.” Fonolo. 20 Oct. 2020. Accessed 2 Nov. 2020.
    • Salesforce. “State of Service.” Salesforce. 4th ed. 2020. Accessed: 8 Feb. 2021.
    • Sopadjieva, Emma, Utpal M. Dholakia, and Beth Benjamin. “A Study of 46,000 Shoppers Shows That Omnichannel Retailing Works.” Harvard Business Review. 3 Jan. 2017. Accessed: 8 Feb. 2021.

    Bibliography (2/2)

    • Tech Pro Research. “Digital Transformation Research Report 2018: Strategy, Returns on Investment, and Challenges.” Tech Pro Research. 29 Jul. 2018. Accessed: 5 Feb. 2021.
    • TSB. “TSB Bank Self-Serve Banking Increases 9% with Adobe Sign.” TSB. N.d. Accessed: 8 Feb. 2021.
    • VoiceSage. “VoiceSage Helps Home Retail Group Transform Customer Experience.” VoiceSage. 4 May 2018. Accessed: 8 Feb. 2021.

    Establish Effective Security Governance & Management

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}380|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.2/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $63,532 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 24 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Governance, Risk & Compliance
    • Parent Category Link: /governance-risk-compliance
    • The security team is unsure of governance needs and how to manage them.
    • There is a lack of alignment between key stakeholder groups
    • There are misunderstandings related to the role of policy and process.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Good governance stems from a deep understanding of how stakeholder groups interact with each other and their respective accountabilities and responsibilities. Without these things, organizational functions tend to interfere with each other, blurring the lines between governance and management and promoting ad–hoc decision making that undermines governance.

    Impact and Result

    • The first phase of this project will help you establish or refine your security governance and management by determining the accountabilities, responsibilities, and key interactions of your stake holder groups.
    • In phase two, the project will guide you through the implementation of essential governance processes: setting up a steering committee, determining risk appetite, and developing a policy exception-handling process.

    Establish Effective Security Governance & Management Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Establish Effective Security Governance and Management Deck – A step-by-step guide to help you establish or refine the governance model for your security program.

    This storyboard will take you through the steps to develop a security governance and management model and implement essential governance processes.

    • Establish Effective Security Governance & Management – Phases 1-2

    2. Design Your Governance Model – A security governance and management model to track accountabilities, responsibilities, stakeholder interactions, and the implementation of key governance processes.

    This tool will help you determine governance and management accountabilities and responsibilities and use them to build a visual governance and management model.

    • Security Governance Model Templates (Visio)
    • Security Governance Model Templates (PDF)
    • Security Governance Model Tool

    3. Organizational Structure Template – A tool to address structural issues that may affect your new governance and management model.

    This template will help you to implement or revise your organizational structure.

    • Security Governance Organizational Structure Template

    4. Information Security Steering Committee Charter & RACI – Templates to formalize the role of your steering committee and the oversight it will provide.

    These templates will help you determine the role a steering committee will play in your governance and management model.

    • Information Security Steering Committee Charter
    • Information Security Steering Committee RACI Chart

    5. Security Policy Lifecycle Template – A template to help you model your policy lifecycle.

    Once this governing document is customized, ensure the appropriate security policies are developed as well.

    • Security Policy Lifecycle Template

    6. Security Policy Exception Approval Process Templates – Templates to establish an approval process for policy exceptions and bolster policy governance and risk management.

    These templates will serve as the foundation of your security policy exception approval processes.

    • Security Policy Exception Approval Workflow (Visio)
    • Security Policy Exception Approval Workflow (PDF)
    • Policy Exception Tracker
    • Information Security Policy Exception Request Form

    Infographic

    Further reading

    Establish Effective Security Governance & Management

    The key is in stakeholder interactions, not policy and process.

    Analyst Perspective

    It's about stakeholder interactions, not policy and process.

    Many security leaders complain about a lack of governance and management in their organizations. They have policies and processes but find neither have had the expected impact and that the organization is teetering on the edge of lawlessness, with stakeholder groups operating in ways that interfere with each other (usually due to poorly defined accountabilities).

    Among the most common examples is security's relationship to the business. When these groups don't align, they tend to see each other as adversaries and make decisions in line with their respective positions: security endorses one standard, the business adopts another.

    The consequences of this are vast. Such an organization is effectively opposed to itself. No wonder policy and process have not resolved the issue.

    At a practical level, good governance stems from understanding how different stakeholder groups interact, providing inputs and outputs to each other and modeling who is accountable for what. But this implied accountability model needs to be formalized (perhaps even modified) before governance can help all stakeholder groups operate as strategic partners with clearly defined roles, responsibilities, and decision-making power. Only when policies and processes reflect this will they serve as effective tools to support governance.

    Logan Rohde, Senior Research Analyst, Security & Privacy

    Logan Rohde
    Senior Research Analyst, Security & Privacy
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge Common Obstacles Info-Tech's Approach
    Ineffective governance and management processes, if they are adopted at all, can lead to:
    • An organization unsure of governance needs and how to manage them.
    • A lack of alignment between key stakeholder groups.
    • Misunderstandings related to the role of policy and process.
    Most governance and management initiatives stumble because they do not address governance as a set of interactions and influences that stakeholders have with and over each other, seeing it instead as policy, process, and risk management. Challenges include:
    • Senior management disinterest
    • Stakeholders operating in silos
    • Separating governance from management
    You will be able to establish a robust governance model to support the current and future state of your organization by accounting for these three essential parts:
    1. Determine governance accountabilities.
    2. Define management responsibilities.
    3. Model stakeholders' interactions, inputs, and outputs as part of business and security operations.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Good governance stems from a deep understanding of how stakeholder groups interact with each other and their respective accountabilities and responsibilities. Without these things, organizational functions tend to interfere with each other, blurring the lines between governance and management and promoting ad hoc decision making that undermines governance.

    Your challenge

    This research is designed to help organizations who need to:

    • Establish security governance from scratch.
    • Improve security governance despite a lack of cooperation from the business.
    • Determine the accountabilities and responsibilities of each stakeholder group.

    This blueprint will solve the above challenges by helping you model your organization's governance structure and implement processes to support the essential governance areas: policy, risk, and performance metrics.

    Percentage of organizations that have yet to fully advance to a maturity-based approach to security

    70%

    Source: McKinsey, 2021

    Common obstacles

    These barriers make this challenge difficult to address for many organizations:

    • The business does not wish to be governed and does not seek to align with security on the basis of risk.
    • Various stakeholder groups essentially govern themselves, causing business functions to interfere with each other.
    • Security teams struggle to differentiate between governance and management and the purpose of each.

    Early adopter infrastructure

    63%
    Security leaders not reporting to the board about risk or incident detection and prevention.
    Source: LogRhythm, 2021

    46%
    Those who report that senior leadership is confident cybersecurity leaders understand business goals.
    Source: LogRhythm, 2021

    Governance isn't just policy and process

    Governance is often mistaken for an organization's formalized policies and processes. While both are important governance supports, they do not provide governance in and of themselves.

    For governance to work well, an organization needs to understand how stakeholder groups interact with each other. What inputs and outputs do they provide? Who is accountable? Who is responsible? These are the questions one needs to ask before designing a governance structure. Failing to account for any of these three elements tends to result in overlap, inefficiency, and a lack of accountability, creating flawed governance.

    Separate governance from management

    Oversight versus operations

    • COBIT emphasizes the importance of separating governance from management. These are complementary functions, but they refer to different parts of organizational operation.
    • Governance provides a decision-making apparatus based on predetermined requirements to ensure smooth operations. It is used to provide oversight and direction and hinges on established accountabilities
    • Simply put, governance refers to what an organization is and is not willing to permit in day-to-day operations, and it tends to make its presence known via the key areas of risk appetite, formal policy and process, and exception handling.
      • Note: These key areas do not provide governance in and of themselves. Rather, governance emerges in accordance with the decisions an organization has made regarding these areas. Sometimes, however, these "decisions" have not been formally or consciously made and the current state of the organization's operations becomes the default - even when it is not working well.
    • Management, by contrast, is concerned with executing business processes in accordance with the governance model, essentially, governance provides guidance for how to make decisions during daily management.

    "Information security governance is the guiding hand that organizes and directs risk mitigation efforts into a business-aligned strategy for the entire organization."

    Steve Durbin,
    Chief Executive,
    Information Security Forum, Forbes, 2023

    Models for governance and management

    Info-Tech's Governance and Management research uses the logic of COBIT's governance and management framework but distills this guidance into a practical, easy-to-implement series of steps, moving beyond the rudimentary logic of COBIT to provide an actionable and personalized governance model.

    Governance Cycle

    Management Cycle

    Clear accountabilities and responsibilities

    Complementary frameworks to simplify governance and management

    The distinction that COBIT draws between governance and management is roughly equivalent to that of accountability and responsibility, as seen in the RACI* model.

    There can be several stakeholders responsible for something, but only one party can be accountable.

    Use this guidance to help determine the accountabilities and responsibilities of your governance and management model.

    *Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed

    COBIT RACI chart

    Security governance framework

    A security governance framework is a system that will design structures, processes, accountability definitions, and membership assignments that lead the security department toward optimal results for the business.

    Governance is performed in three ways:

    1 Evaluate 2 Direct 3 Monitor
    For governance to be effective it must account for stakeholder interests and business needs. Determining what these are is the vital first step. Governance is used to determine how things should be done within an organization. It sets standards and provides oversight so decisions can be made during day-to-day management. Governance needs change and inefficiencies need to be revised. Therefore, monitoring key performance indicators is an essential step to course correct as organizational needs evolve.

    "Governance specifies the accountability framework and provides oversight to ensure that risks are adequately mitigated, while management ensures that controls are implemented to mitigate risks. Management recommends security strategies. Governance ensures that security strategies are aligned with business objectives and consistent with regulations."
    - EDUCAUSE

    Establish Effective Security Governance & Management

    SMART metrics

    Suggested targets to measure success

    Specific

    Measurable

    Achievable

    Relevant

    Time-Bound

    Examples
    Security's risk analyses will be included as part of the business decision-making process within three months after completing the governance initiative.
    Increase rate of security risk analysis using risk appetite within three months of project completion.
    Have stakeholder engagement supply input into security risk-management decisions within three months of completing phase one of blueprint.
    Reduce time to approve policy exceptions by 25%.
    Reduce security risk related to policy non-compliance by 50% within one year.
    Develop five KPIs to measure progress of governance and management within three months of completing blueprint.

    Info-Tech's methodology for security governance and management

    1. Design Your Governance Model 2. Implement Essential Governance Processes
    Phase Steps
    1. Evaluate
    2. Direct
    3. Monitor
    1. Implement Oversight
    2. Set Risk Appetite
    3. Implement Policy Lifecycle
    Phase Outcomes
    • Defined governance accountabilities
    • Defined management responsibilities
    • Record of key stakeholder interactions
    • Visual governance model
    • Key performance indicators (KPIs)
    • Established steering committee
    • Qualitative risk-appetite statements
    • Policy lifecycle
    • Policy exceptions-handling process

    Governance starts with mapping stakeholder inputs, outputs, and throughputs

    The key is in stakeholder interactions, not policy and process
    Good governance stems from a deep understanding of how stakeholder groups interact with each other and their respective accountabilities and responsibilities. Without these things, organizational functions tend to interfere with each other, blurring the lines between governance and management and promoting ad hoc decision making that undermines governance.

    Policy, process, and org. charts support governance but do not produce it on their own
    To be effective, these things need to be developed with the accountabilities and influence of the organizational functions that produce them.

    A lack of business alignment does not mean you're doomed to fail
    While the highest levels of governance maturity depend on strong security-business alignment, there are still tactics one can use to improve governance.

    All organizations have governance
    Sometimes it is poorly defined, ineffective, and occurs in the same place as management, but it exists at some level, acting as the decision-making apparatus for an organization (i.e. what can and cannot occur).

    Risk tolerances are variable across lines of business
    This can lead to misalignments between security and the business, as each may have their own tolerance for particular risks. The remedy is to understand the risk appetite of the business and allow this to inform security risk management decisions.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    Security Governance Model Tool

    Security Governance Organizational Structure Template

    Information Security Steering Committee Charter & RACI

    Policy Exceptions-Handling Workflow

    Policy Exception Tracker and Request Form

    Key deliverable:

    Security Governance Model

    By the end of this blueprint, you will have created a personalized governance model to map your stakeholders' accountabilities, responsibilities, and key interactions.

    Blueprint benefits

    IT Benefits Business Benefits
    • Correct any overlapping and mismanaged security processes by assigning accountabilities and responsibilities to each stakeholder group.
    • Improve efficiency and effectiveness of the security program by separating governance from management.
    • Determine necessary inputs and outputs from stakeholder interactions to ensure the governance model functions as intended.
    • Improved support of business goals through security-business alignment.
    • Better risk management by defining risk appetite with security.
    • Increased stakeholder satisfaction via a governance model designed to meet their needs.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit Guided Implementation Workshop Consulting
    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks are used throughout all four options.

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Phase 1 Phase 2
    Call #1: Scope requirements, objectives, and your specific challenges. Call #2: Determine governance requirements.
    Call #3: Review governance model.
    Call #4: Determine KPIs.
    Call #5: Stand up steering committee.
    Call #6: Set risk appetite.
    Call #7: Establish policy lifecycle.
    Call #8: Revise exception-handing process.

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is 4 to 8 calls over the course of 2 to 3 months.

    Workshop Overview

    Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
    Activities Evaluate Direct Monitor Implement Essential Governance Processes Next Steps and Wrap-Up (offsite)
    1.1 Prioritize governance accountabilities
    1.2 Prioritize management responsibilities
    1.3 Evaluate organizational structure
    2.1 Align with business
    2.2 Build security governance and management model
    2.3 Visualize security governance and management model
    3.1 Develop governance and management KPIs 4.1 Draft steering committee charter
    4.2 Complete steering committee RACI
    4.3 Draft qualitative risk statements
    4.4 Define policy management lifecycle
    4.5 Establish policy exception approval process
    5.1 Complete in-progress deliverables from previous four days
    5.2 Set up review time for workshop deliverables and to discuss next steps
    Deliverables
    1. Prioritized list of accountabilities and responsibilities
    2. Revised organizational structure
    1. Security governance and management model
    1. Security Metrics Determination and Tracking Tool
    2. KPI Development Worksheet
    1. Steering committee charter and RACI
    2. Risk-appetite statements
    3. Policy management lifecycle
    4. Policy exception approval process

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Customize your journey

    The security governance and management blueprint pairs well with security design and security strategy.

    • The governance and management model you create in this blueprint will inform efforts to improve security, like revisiting security program design and your security strategy.
    • Work with your member services director, executive advisor, or technical counselor to scope the journey you need. They will work with you to align the subject matter experts to support your roadmap and workshops.

    Workshop Day 1 and Day 2
    Security Governance and Management

    Workshop Day 3 and Day 4
    Security Strategy Gap Analysis or Security Program Design Factors

    Phase 1

    Design Your Governance Model

    Phase 1
    1.1 Evaluate
    1.2 Direct
    1.3 Monitor

    Phase 2
    2.1 Implement Oversight
    2.2 Set Risk Appetite
    2.3 Implement Policy lifecycle

    Establish Security Governance & Management

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Prioritize governance accountabilities
    • Prioritize management responsibilities
    • Evaluate current organizational structure
    • Align with the business
    • Build security governance and management model
    • Finalize governance and management model
    • Develop governance and management KPIs

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • CISO
    • CIO
    • Business representative

    Step 1.1

    Evaluate

    Activities
    1.1.1 Prioritize governance accountabilities
    1.1.2 Prioritize management responsibilities
    1.1.3 Evaluate current organizational structure

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CISO
    • CIO
    • Business representative

    Outcomes of this step

    • Defined governance accountabilities
    • Defined management responsibilities

    Design Your Governance Model

    Step 1.1 > Step 1.2 > Step 1.3

    Evaluate: Getting started

    Element Questions
    Compliance What voluntary or mandatory standards must be represented in my governance model?
    Legal What laws are the organization accountable to? Who is the accountable party?
    Business needs What does the business need to operate? What sort of informational or operational flows need to be accounted for?
    Culture How does the business operate? Are departments siloed or cooperative? Where does security fit in?
    Decision-making process How are decisions made? Who is involved? What information needs to be available to do so?
    Willingness to be governed Is the organization adverse to formal governance mechanisms? Are there any opportunities to improve alignment with the business?
    Relevant trends Are there recent developments (e.g. new privacy laws) that are likely to affect the organization in the future? Will this complicate or simplify governance modeling efforts?
    Stakeholder interests Who are the internal and external stakeholders that need to be represented in the governance model?

    The above is a summary of COBIT 2019 EDM01.01 Evaluate the governance system, along with Info-Tech-recommended questions to contextualize each element for your organization.

    1.1.1 Prioritize governance accountabilities

    1-2 hours

    Using the example on the next slide, complete the following steps.

    1. Download Info-Tech's Security Governance Model Tool using the link below and customize the stakeholder groups on tab 1 to reflect the makeup of your organization.
    2. Using the previous slide as a guide, evaluate your organization's internal and external pressures and discuss their possible impacts your governance and management model.
    3. Complete tab 2, Governance Prioritization, indicating your response to each prompt using the drop-down menus. The tool will score your responses and provide you with a prioritized list of governance accountabilities based on greatest need on tab 4, Governance Model Builder.
    4. Review the list and make any desired modifications to the prompts on tab 2 and then move on to Activity 1.1.2. (We will return to tab 4 in Step 2.1.) Remember to evaluate the results against the internal/external pressure analysis to ensure these details are reflected.

    Download the Security Governance Model Tool

    Input Output
    • List of governance pressures
  • Prioritized list of governance accountabilities
  • Materials Participants
    • Security Governance Model Tool
    • CISO
    • CIO
    • Security Operations
    • Business representative (optional)

    Security Governance and Management Model Tool

    Tabs 2 and 3

    Security Governance and Management Model Tool

    1.1.2 Prioritize management responsibilities

    1 hours

    Using the examples on the previous slide, complete the following steps.

    1. Complete tab 3, Management Prioritization, indicating your response to each prompt using the drop-down menus. The tool will score your responses and provide you with a prioritized list of governance accountabilities based on greatest need on tab 4, Governance Model Builder.
    2. Review the list and make any desired modifications to the prompts on tab 3 and then move on to Activity 1.1.3. (We will return to tab 4 in Step 2.1.) Remember to evaluate the results against the internal/external pressure analysis to ensure these details are reflected.

    Download Security Governance Model Tool

    InputOutput
    • Pressure analysis
    • Prioritized list of management responsibilities
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Security Governance Model Tool
    • CISO
    • CIO
    • Business representative (optional)

    Security Governance and Management Model Tool

    Tab 4

    Security Governance and Management Model Tool Tab 4

    1.1.3 Evaluate current organizational structure

    1-3 hours

    1. Download and modify Info-Tech's Security Governance Organizational Structure Template to reflect the reporting structure at your organization. If such a document already exists, simply review it and move on to the next step below.
    2. Determine if the current organizational structure will negatively affect your ability to pursue the items in your prioritized lists from governance accountabilities and management responsibilities (e.g. conflicts of interest related to oversight or reporting), and discuss the feasibility of changing the current governance structure.
    3. Record these recommended changes and any other key points you'd like the business or other stakeholders to be aware of. We'll use this information in the business alignment exercise in Step 2.1

    Download the Security Governance Organizational Structure Template

    Input Output
    • Prioritized lists of governance accountabilities and management responsibilities
    • Updated organizational structure
    Materials Participants
    • Security Governance Organizational Structure Template
    • CISO

    Info-Tech resources

    Locate structural problems in advance

    • If you do not already have a diagram of your organization's reporting structure, use this template to create one. Examples are provided for high, medium, and low maturity.
    • The existing reporting structure will likely affect the governance model you create, as it may not be feasible to assign certain governance accountabilities and management responsibilities to certain stakeholders.
      • For example, it may make sense for the head of security to approve the security budget, but if they report to a CIO with greater authority that accountability will likely have to sit with the CIO instead.

    Download the Security Governance Organizational Structure Template

    Security Governance Organizational Structure

    Step 1.2

    Direct

    Activities
    1.2.1 Align with the business
    1.2.2 Build security governance and management model
    1.2.3 Finalize governance and management model

    This step involves the following participants:

    CISO

    CIO

    Business representative

    Outcomes of this step

    • Record of key stakeholder interactions
    • Visual governance model

    Design Your Governance Model

    Step 1.1 > Step 1.2 > Step 1.3

    Direct: Getting started

    Element Questions
    Business alignment Do we have a full understanding of the business's approach to risk and security's role to support business objectives?
    Organizational security process How well do our current processes work? Are we missing any key processes?
    Steering committee Will we use a dedicated steering committee to oversee security governance, or will another stakeholder assume this role?
    Security awareness Does the organization have a strong security culture? Does an effort need to be made to educate stakeholder groups on the role of security in the organization?
    Roles and responsibilities Does the organization use RACI charts or another system to define roles and document duties?
    Communication flows Do we have a good understanding of how information flows between stakeholder groups? Are there any gaps that need to be addressed (e.g. regular board reporting)?

    The above is a summary of COBIT 2019 EDM01.02 Direct the governance system, along with Info-Tech-recommended questions to contextualize each element for your organization.

    Embed security governance within enterprise governance

    Design structures, processes, authority definitions, and steering committee assignments to drive optimal business results.

    Embed security governance within enterprise governance

    1.2.1 Align with the business

    1-3 hours

    1. Request a meeting with the business to present your findings from the previous activities in Step 1.1. As you prepare for the meeting, remember to following points:
    • The goal here is to align, not to command. You want the business to see the security team as a strategic ally that supports the pursuit of business goals.
    • Make recommendations and explain any security risks associated with the direction the business wants to take, but the goal is not to strongarm the business into adopting your perspective.
    • Above all, listen to the business to learn more about how they relate to governance and what their priorities are. This will help you adapt your governance model to better support business needs.

    Info-Tech Insight
    A lack of business participation does not mean your governance initiative is doomed. From this lack, we can still infer their attitudes toward security governance, and we can account for this in our governance model. This may limit the maturity your program can reach, but it doesn't prevent improvements from being made to your current security governance.

    InputOutput
    • Prioritized lists of governance accountabilities and management responsibilities
    • Current organizational structure
    • List of recommendations or proposed changes
    • Security governance and management target state definition
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Means to capture key points of the conversation (e.g. notebook, recorded meeting)
    • CISO
    • CIO
    • Business representative

    1.2.2 Build security governance and management model

    1-2 hours

    Using the example on the next slide, complete the following steps:

    1. On tab 4, review the prioritized lists for governance accountabilities and management responsibilities and begin assigning them to the appropriate stakeholder groups.
    • Remember: Responsibilities can be assigned to up to four stakeholders, but there can be only one party listed as accountable.
  • Use the drop-down menus to record any interactions that occur between the groups (e.g. repots to, appoints, approves, oversees).
    • Documenting these interactions will help you ensure your governance program accounts for inputs and outputs that are required by, or that otherwise affect, your various stakeholder groups.

    Note: You may wish to review Info-Tech's governance model templates before completing this activity to get an idea of what you'll be working toward in this step. See slides 37-38.

    Download Security Governance Model Tool

    InputOutput
    • Prioritized lists of governance accountabilities and management responsibilities
    • Target state from business alignment exercise
    • Summary of governance model
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Security Governance Model Tool
    • CISO
    • CIO
    • Business representative (optional)

    Security Governance and Management Model Tool

    Tab 5

    Security Governance and Management Model Tool Tab 5

    Security Governance and Management Model Tool continued

    Tab 6

    Security Governance and Management Model Tool Tab 6

    1.2.3 Visualize your security governance and management model

    1-2 hours

    1. Download the Security Governance Model Templates using the link below and determine which of the three example models most closely resembles your own.
    2. Once you have chosen an example to work from, begin customizing it to reflect the governance model completed in Activity 1.2.2. See next slide for example.

    Note: You do not have to use these templates. If you prefer, you can use them as inspiration and design your own model.

    Download Security Governance Model Templates

    InputOutput
    • Results of Activity 2.1.2
    • Security governance and management model diagram
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Security Governance Model Templates
    • CISO

    Customize the template

    Customize the template

    Step 1.3

    Monitor

    Activities
    1.3.1 Develop governance and management KPIs

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CISO
    • CIO
    • Security team
    • Business representative

    Outcomes of this step

    Key performance indicators

    Design Your Governance Model

    Step 1.1 > Step 1.2 > Step 1.3

    Monitor: Getting started

    Element Questions
    Metrics Does the organization have a well-developed metrics program or will this need to be taken up as a separate effort? Have we considered what outcomes we are hoping to see as a result of implementing a new governance and management model?
    Existing and emerging threats What has changed or is likely to change in the future that may destabilize our governance program? What do we need to do to mitigate any security risks to our organizational governance and management?

    The above is a summary of COBIT 2019 EDM01.03 Monitor the governance system, along with Info-Tech-recommended questions to contextualize each element for your organization.

    1.3.1 Develop governance and management KPIs

    1-2 hours

    This activity is meant to provide a starting point for key governance metrics. To develop a comprehensive metrics program, see Info-Tech's Build a Security Metrics Program to Drive Maturity blueprint.

    1. Create a list of four to six outcomes you'd like to see as the result of your new governance model. Be as specific as you can; the better defied the outcome, the easier it will be to determine suitable KPI.
    2. For each desired outcome, determine what would best indicate that progress is being made toward that state.
    • Desired outcome: security team is consulted before critical business decisions are made.
    • Success criteria: the business evaluates Security's recommendations before starting new projects
    • Possible KPI: % of critical business decisions made with security consultation
    • See next slide for additional examples

    Note: Try to phrase each KPI using percents, which helps to add context to the metric and will make it easier to explain when reporting metrics in the future.

    Input Output
    • List of desired outcomes after new governance model implemented
    • Set of key performance indicators
    Materials Participants
    • Whiteboard
    • CISO
    • CIO
    • Security team
    • Business representative (optional)

    Example KPIs

    Desired Outcome Success Criteria Possible KPI
    Security team is consulted before critical business decisions are made The business evaluates Security's recommendations before starting new projects % of critical business decisions with Security consultation
    Greater alignment over risk appetite The business does not take on initiatives with excessive security risks % of incidents stemming from not following Security's risk management recommendations
    Reduced number of policy exceptions Policy exceptions are only granted when a clear need is present and a formal process is followed % of incidents stemming from policy exceptions
    Improved policy adherence Policies are understood and followed throughout the organization % of incidents stemming from policy violations

    Establish Baseline Metrics

    Baseline metrics will be improved through:

    1. Improved business alignment
    2. Developing formal process to manage security risks
    3. Separating governance from management
    Metric Current Goal
    % of critical business decisions with Security consultation 20% 100%
    % of incidents stemming from not following Security's risk management recommendations 65% 0%
    % of incidents stemming from policy exceptions 35% 5%
    % of incidents stemming from policy violations 40% 5%
    % of ad hoc decisions made (i.e. not accounted for by governance model 85% 5%
    % of accepted security risks evaluated against risk appetite 50% 100%
    % of deferred steering committee decisions (i.e. decisions not made ASAP after issue arises) 50% 5%
    % of policies approved within target window (e.g. 1 month) 20% 100%

    Phase 2

    Implement Essential Governance Processes

    Phase 1
    1.1 Evaluate
    1.2 Direct
    1.3 Monitor

    Phase 2
    2.1 Implement Oversight
    2.2 Set Risk Appetite
    2.3 Implement Policy Lifecycle

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Draft Steering Committee Charter
    • Complete Steering Committee RACI
    • Draft qualitative risk statements
    • Model policy lifecycle
    • Establish exceptions-handling process

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • CISO
    • CRO
    • CIO
    • HR
    • Internal Audit
    • Business representative
    • Legal

    Establish Security Governance & Management

    Step 2.1

    Implement Oversight

    Activities
    2.1.1 Draft steering committee charter
    2.1.2 Complete steering committee RACI

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CISO
    • CRO
    • CIO
    • HR
    • Internal Audit
    • Business representative
    • Legal

    Outcomes of this step

    Steering Committee Charter and RACI

    Implement Essential Governance Processes

    Step 2.1 > Step 2.2 > Step 2.3

    2.1.1 Draft steering committee charter

    1-3 hours

    This activity is meant to provide a starting point for your steering committee. If a more comprehensive approach is desired, see Info-Tech's Improve Security Governance With a Security Steering Committee blueprint.

    1. Download the template using the link below and review the various sections of the document
    2. Review slides 50-51 to help determine the scope of your steering committee's role. Discuss with other stakeholder groups, as necessary, to determine the steering committee's duties, how often the group will meet, and what the regular meeting agenda will be.
    3. Customize the template to suit your organization's needs.

    Download Information Security Steering Committee Charter

    Input Output
    • N/A
    • Steering Committee
    Materials Participants
    • Information Security Steering Committee Charter Template
    • CISO
    • CRO
    • CIO
    • HR
    • Internal Audit
    • Business representative
    • Legal

    Steering committee membership

    Representation is key, but don't try to please everyone

    • For your steering committee to be effective, it should include representatives from across the organization. However, it is important not to overextend committee membership, which can interfere with decision making.
    • Participants should be selected based on the identified responsibilities of the security steering committee, and the number of people should be appropriate to the size and complexity of the organization.

    Example steering committee

    CISO
    CRO
    Internal Audit
    CIO
    Business Leaders
    HR
    Legal

    Download Information Security Steering Committee Charter

    Typical steering committee duties

    Strategic Oversight Policy Governance
    • Provide oversight and ensure alignment between information security governance and company objectives.
    • Assess the adequacy of resources and funding to sustain and advance successful security programs and practices for identifying, assessing, and mitigating cybersecurity risks across all business functions.
    • Review control audit reports and resulting remediation plans to ensure business alignment
    • Review the company's cyber insurance policies to ensure appropriate coverage.
    • Provide recommendations, based on security best practices, for significant technology investments.
    • Review policy-exception requests to determine if potential security risks can be accepted or if a workaround exists.
    • Assess the ramifications of updates to policies and standards.
    • Establish standards and procedures for escalating significant security incidents to the board, other steering committees, government agencies, and law enforcement, as appropriate.

    Typical steering committee duties

    Risk Governance Monitoring and Reporting
    • Review and approve the company's information risk governance structure.
    • Assess the company's high-risk information assets and coordinate planning to address information privacy and security needs.
    • Provide input to executive management regarding the enterprise's information security risk tolerance.
    • Review the company's cyber-response preparedness, incident response plans, and disaster recovery capabilities as applicable to the organization's information security strategy.
    • Promote an open discussion regarding information risk and integrate information risk management into the enterprise's objectives.
    • Receive periodic reports and coordinate with management on the metrics used to measure, monitor, and manage cyber risks posed to the company and to review periodic reports on selected security risk topics as the committee deems appropriate.
    • Monitor and evaluate the quality and effectiveness of the company's technology security, capabilities for disaster recovery, data protection, cyber threat detection, and cyber incident response, and management of technology-related compliance risks.

    2.1.2 Complete steering committee RACI

    1-3 hours

    1. Download the RACI template and review the membership roles. Customize the template to match the makeup of your steering committee.
    2. Read through each task in the left-hand column and determine who will be involved:
    • R - responsible: the person doing the action (can be multiple)
    • A - accountable: the owner of the task, usually a department head who delegates the execution of the task (only assigned to one stakeholder)
    • C - consulted: stakeholders that offer some kind of guidance, advice, or recommendation (can be multiple)
    • I - Informed: stakeholders that receive status updates about the task (can be multiple)

    Note: All tasks must have accountability and responsibility assigned (sometimes a single stakeholder is accountable and responsible). However, not all tasks will have someone consulted or informed.

    Download Information Security Steering Committee RACI Chart

    InputOutput
    • N/A
    • Defined roles and responsibilities
    MaterialsParticipants
    • RACI Chart
    • CISO
    • CRO
    • CIO
    • HR
    • Internal Audit
    • Business representative
    • Legal

    Step 2.2

    Set Risk Appetite

    Activities
    2.2.1 Draft qualitative risk statements

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CISO
    • CIO
    • Business representative

    Outcomes of this step

    Qualitative risk appetite

    Implement Essential Governance Processes

    Step 2.1 > Step 2.2 > Step 2.3

    Know your appetite for risk

    What is an organizational risk appetite?

    Setting risk appetite is a key governance function, as it structures how your organization will deal with the risks it will inevitably face - when they can be accepted, when they need to be mitigated, and when they must be rejected entirely.

    It is important to note that risk appetite and risk tolerance are not the same. Risk appetite refers to the amount of risk the organization is willing to accept as part of doing business, whereas risk tolerance has more to do with individual risks affecting one or more lines of business that exceed that appetite. Such risks are often tolerated as individual cases that can be mitigated to an acceptable level of risk even though it exceeds the risk-appetite threshold.

    Chart Risk Appetite

    2.1.2 Draft qualitative risk-appetite statements

    1-3 hours

    This activity is meant to provide a starting point for risk governance. To develop a comprehensive risk-management program, see Info-Tech's Combine Security Risk Management Components Into One Program blueprint.

    1. Draft statements that express your attitudes toward the kinds of risks your organization faces. The point is to set boundaries to better understand when risk mitigation may be necessary.
    2. Examples:
    • We will not accept risks that may cause us to violate SLAs.
    • We will avoid risks that may prevent the organization from operating normally.
    • We will not accept risks that may result in exposure of confidential information.
    • We will not accept risks that may cause significant brand damage.
    • We will not accept risks that pose undue risk to human life or safety.
    InputOutput
    • Definitions for high, medium, low impact and frequency
    • Set of qualitative risk-appetite statements
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Whiteboard
    • CISO
    • CIO
    • Business representative

    Step 2.3

    Implement Policy Lifecycle

    Activities
    2.3.1 Model your policy lifecycle
    2.3.2 Establish exception-approval process

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CISO
    • CIO

    Outcomes of this step

    Policy lifecycle

    Exceptions-handling process

    Implement Essential Governance Processes

    Step 2.1 > Step 2.2 > Step 2.3

    2.3.1 Model your policy lifecycle

    1-3 hours

    This activity is meant to provide a starting point for policy governance. To develop a comprehensive policy-management program, see Info-Tech's Develop and Deploy Security Policies blueprint.

    1. Review the sections within the Security Policy Lifecycle Template and delete any sections or subsections that do not apply to your organization.
    2. As necessary, modify the lifecycle and receive approved sign-off by your organization's leadership.
    3. Solicit feedback from stakeholders, specifically, IT department management and business stakeholders.

    Download the Security Policy Lifecycle Template

    InputOutput
    • N/A
    • Policy lifecycle
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Security Policy Lifecycle Template
    • CISO
    • CIO

    Develop the security policy lifecycle

    The security policy lifecycle is an integral component of the security policy program and adds value by:

    • Setting out a roadmap to define needs, develop required documentation, and implement, communicate, and measure your policy program.
    • Defining roles and responsibilities for the security policy suite.
    • Aligning the business goals, security program goals, and policy objectives.

    Security Policy Lifecycle

    Diagram inspired by: ComplianceBridge, 2021

    2.3.2 Establish exception-approval process

    1-3 hours

    1. Download the Security Policy Exception Approval Template and customize it to match your exception-handling process. Be sure to account for the recommendations on the next slide.
    2. Use the Policy Exception Tracker to record and monitor granted exceptions.

    Download the Security Policy Exception Approval Workflow

    Download the Security Policy Exception Tracker

    Input Output
    • Answers to questions provided
    • Exception-handling process
    Materials Participants
    • Security Policy Exception Approval Workflow
    • Security Policy Exception Tracker
    • CISO
    • CIO

    Determine criteria to grant policy exception

    A key part of security risk and policy governance

    • Not all policies can be complied with all the time. As technology and business needs change, sometimes exceptions must be granted for operations to continue smoothly.
    • Exceptions can be either short or long term.
      • Short-term exceptions are often granted until a particular security gap can be closed, such as allowing staff to temporarily use new laptops that have yet to receive a required VPN for remote access.
      • Long-term exceptions usually occur when closing the gap entirely is not feasible. For example, a legacy system may be unable to meet evolving security standards, but there is no room in the budget to replace it.
    • Having a formal approval process for exceptions and a record of granted exceptions will help you to stay on top of security risk governance.

    Before granting an exception:

    1. Assess security risks associated with doing so: are they acceptable?
    2. Look for another way to resolve the issue: is a suitable workaround possible?
    3. Evaluate mitigating controls: is it possible to provide an equivalent level of security via other means?
    4. Assign risk ownership: who will be accountable if an incident arises from the exception?
    5. Determine appeals process: when disagreements arise, how will the final decision be made?

    Sources: University of Virginia; CIS

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Problem Solved

    You have now established a formal governance model for your organization - congratulations! Building this model and determining stakeholders' accountabilities and responsibilities is a big step.

    Remember to continue to use the evaluate-direct-monitor framework to make sure your governance model evolves as organizational governance matures and priorities shift.

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through an Info-Tech workshop or Guided Implementation.

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com
    1-888-670-8889

    Additional Support

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech Workshop.

    To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.

    Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech's historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    Build Governance Model
    Build a customized security governance model for your organization.

    Develop policy lifecycle
    Develop a policy lifecycle and exceptions-handling process.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Build an Information Security Strategy

    Design a Business-Focused Security Program

    Combine Security Risk Management Components Into One Program

    Research contributors and experts

    Michelle Tran, Consulting Industry

    Michelle Tran
    Consulting Industry

    One anonymous contributor

    Bibliography

    Durbin, Steve. "Achieving The Five Levels Of Information Security Governance." Forbes, 4 Apr. 2023. Accessed 4 Apr. 2023.

    Eiden, Kevin, et al. "Organizational Cyber Maturity: A Survey of Industries." McKinsey & Company, 4 Aug. 2021. Accessed 25 Apr. 2023.

    "Information Security Exception Policy." Center for Internet Security, 2020. Accessed 14 Apr. 2023.

    "Information Security Governance." EDUCAUSE, n.d. Accessed 27 Apr. 2023.

    ISACA. COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives. GF Books, 2018.

    Policies & Procedures Team. "Your Policy for Policies: Creating a Policy Management Framework." ComplianceBridge, 30 Apr. 2021. Accessed 27 Apr. 2023.

    "Security and the C-Suite: Making Security Priorities Business Priorities." LogRhythm, Feb. 2021. Accessed 25 Apr 2023.

    University of Virginia. "Policy, Standards, and Procedures Exceptions Process." Information Security at UVA, 1 Jun. 2022. Accessed 14 Apr. 2023

    Service Desk

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}11|cart{/j2store}
    • Related Products: {j2store}11|crosssells{/j2store}
    • Up-Sell: {j2store}11|upsells{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.4/10
    • member rating average dollars saved: $22,900
    • member rating average days saved: 20
    • Parent Category Name: Infra and Operations
    • Parent Category Link: /infra-and-operations
    The service desk is typically the first point of contact for clients and staff who need something. Make sure your team is engaged, involved, knowledgeable, and gives excellent customer service.

    Tech Trend Update: If Digital Ethics Then Data Equity

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}100|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve.
    • member rating average days saved: Read what our members are saying
    • Parent Category Name: Innovation
    • Parent Category Link: /innovation

    COVID-19 is driving the need for quick technology solutions, including some that require personal data collection. Organizations are uncertain about the right thing to do.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Data equity approaches personal data like money, putting the owner in control and helping to protect against unethical systems.

    Impact and Result

    There are some key considerations for businesses grappling with digital ethics:

    1. If partnering, set expectations.
    2. If building, invite criticism.
    3. If imbuing authority, consider the most vulnerable.

    Tech Trend Update: If Digital Ethics Then Data Equity Research & Tools

    Tech Trend Update: If Digital Ethics Then Data Equity

    Understand how to use data equity as an ethical guidepost to create technology that will benefit everyone.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    • Tech Trend Update: If Digital Ethics Then Data Equity Storyboard
    [infographic]

    Automate Testing to Get More Done

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}285|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $29,139 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 5 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Testing, Deployment & QA
    • Parent Category Link: /testing-deployment-and-qa
    • Today’s rapidly changing software products and operational processes create mounting pressure on software delivery teams to release new features and changes quickly while meeting high and demanding quality standards.
    • Most organizations see automated testing as a solution to meet this demand alongside their continuous delivery pipeline. However, they often lack the critical foundations, skills, and practices that are imperative for success.
    • The technology is available to enable automated testing for many scenarios and systems, but industry noise and an expansive tooling marketplace create confusion for those interested in adopting this technology.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Good automated testing improves development throughput. No matter how quickly you put changes into production, end users will not accept them if they do not meet quality standards. Escaped defects, refactoring, and technical debt can significantly hinder your team’s ability to deliver software on time and on budget. In fact, 65% of organizations saw a reduction of test cycle time and 62% saw reductions in test costs with automated testing (Sogeti, World Quality Report 2020–21).
    • Start automation with unit and functional tests. Automated testing has a sharp learning curve, due to either the technical skills to implement and operate it or the test cases you are asked to automate. Unit tests and functional tests are ideal starting points in your automation journey because of the available tools and knowledge in the industry, the contained nature of the tests you are asked to execute, and the repeated use of the artifacts in more complicated tests (such as performance and integration tests). After all, you want to make sure the application works before stressing it.
    • Automated testing is a cross-functional practice, not a silo. A core component of successful software delivery throughput is recognizing and addressing defects, bugs, and other system issues early and throughout the software development lifecycle (SDLC). This involves having all software delivery roles collaborate on and participate in automated test case design, configure and orchestrate testing tools with other delivery tools, and proactively prepare the necessary test data and environments for test types.

    Impact and Result

    • Bring the right people to the table. Automated testing involves significant people, process and technology changes across multiple software delivery roles. These roles will help guide how automated testing will compliment and enhance their responsibilities.
    • Build a foundation. Review your current circumstances to understand the challenges blocking automated testing. Establish a strong base of good practices to support the gradually adoption of automated testing across all test types.
    • Start with one application. Verify and validate the automated testing practices used in one application and their fit for other applications and systems. Develop a reference guide to assist new teams.

    Automate Testing to Get More Done Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should automate testing, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    2. Adopt good automated testing practices

    Develop and implement practices that mature your automated testing capabilities.

    • Automated Testing Quick Reference Template

    Infographic

    Workshop: Automate Testing to Get More Done

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Adopt Good Automated Testing Practices

    The Purpose

    Understand the goals of and your vision for your automated testing practice.

    Develop your automated testing foundational practices.

    Adopt good practices for each test type.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Level set automated testing expectations and objectives.

    Learn the key practices needed to mature and streamline your automated testing across all test types.

    Activities

    1.1 Build a foundation.

    1.2 Automate your test types.

    Outputs

    Automated testing vision, expectations, and metrics

    Current state of your automated testing practice

    Ownership of the implementation and execution of automated testing foundations

    List of practices to introduce automation to for each test type

    Build an Application Integration Strategy

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}198|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 8.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve.
    • member rating average days saved: Read what our members are saying
    • Parent Category Name: Enterprise Integration
    • Parent Category Link: /enterprise-integration
    • Even though organizations are now planning for Application Integration (AI) in their projects, very few have developed a holistic approach to their integration problems resulting in each project deploying different tactical solutions.
    • Point-to-point and ad hoc integration solutions won’t cut it anymore: the cloud, big data, mobile, social, and new regulations require more sophisticated integration tooling.
    • Loosely defined AI strategies result in point solutions, overlaps in technology capabilities, and increased maintenance costs; the correlation between business drivers and technical solutions is lost.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Involving the business in strategy development will keep them engaged and align business drivers with technical initiatives.
    • An architectural approach to AI strategy is critical to making appropriate technology decisions and promoting consistency across AI solutions through the use of common patterns.
    • Get control of your AI environment with an appropriate architecture, including policies and procedures, before end users start adding bring-your-own-integration (BYOI) capabilities to the office.

    Impact and Result

    • Engage in a formal AI strategy and involve the business when aligning business goals with AI value; each double the AI success rate.
    • Benefits from a formal AI strategy largely depend on how gaps will be filled.
    • Create an Integration Center of Competency for maintaining architectural standards and guidelines.
    • AI strategies are continuously updated as new business drivers emerge from changing business environments and/or essential technologies.

    Build an Application Integration Strategy Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Make the Case for AI Strategy

    Obtain organizational buy-in and build a standardized and formal AI blueprint.

    • Storyboard: Build an Application Integration Strategy

    2. Assess the organization's readiness for AI

    Assess your people, process, and technology for AI readiness and realize areas for improvement.

    • Application Integration Readiness Assessment Tool

    3. Develop a Vision

    Fill the required AI-related roles to meet business requirements

    • Application Integration Architect
    • Application Integration Specialist

    4. Perform a Gap Analysis

    Assess the appropriateness of AI in your organization and identify gaps in people, processes, and technology as it relates to AI.

    • Application Integration Appropriateness Assessment Tool

    5. Build an AI Roadmap

    Compile the important information and artifacts to include in the AI blueprint.

    • Application Integration Strategy Template

    6. Build the Integration Blueprint

    Keep a record of services and interfaces to reduce waste.

    • Integration Service Catalog Template

    Infographic

    Workshop: Build an Application Integration Strategy

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Make the Case for AI Strategy

    The Purpose

    Uncover current and future AI business drivers, and assess current capabilities.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Perform a current state assessment and create a future vision.

    Activities

    1.1 Identify Current and Future Business Drivers

    1.2 AI Readiness Assessment

    1.3 Integration Service Catalog Template

    Outputs

    High-level groupings of AI strategy business drivers.

    Determine the organization’s readiness for AI, and identify areas for improvement.

    Create a record of services and interfaces to reduce waste.

    2 Know Current Environment

    The Purpose

    Identify building blocks, common patterns, and decompose them.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Develop an AI Architecture.

    Activities

    2.1 Integration Principles

    2.2 High-level Patterns

    2.3 Pattern decomposition and recomposition

    Outputs

    Set general AI architecture principles.

    Categorize future and existing interactions by pattern to establish your integration framework.

    Identification of common functional components across patterns.

    3 Perform a Gap Analysis

    The Purpose

    Analyze the gaps between the current and future environment in people, process, and technology.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Uncover gaps between current and future capabilities and determine if your ideal environment is feasible.

    Activities

    3.1 Gap Analysis

    Outputs

    Identify gaps between the current environment and future AI vision.

    4 Build a Roadmap for Application Integration

    The Purpose

    Define strategic initiatives, know your resource constraints, and use a timeline for planning AI.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Create a plan of strategic initiatives required to close gaps.

    Activities

    4.1 Identify and prioritize strategic initiatives

    4.2 Distribute initiatives on a timeline

    Outputs

    Use strategic initiatives to build the AI strategy roadmap.

    Establish when initiatives are going to take place.

    Build a Data Warehouse

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}200|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 8.7/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $94,499 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 30 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Big Data
    • Parent Category Link: /big-data
    • Relational data warehouses, although reliable, centralized repositories for corporate data, were not built to handle the speed and volume of data and analytics today.
    • IT is under immense pressure from business units to provide technology that will yield greater agility and insight.
    • While some organizations are benefitting from modernization technologies, the majority of IT departments are unfamiliar with the technologies and have not yet defined clear use cases.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • The vast majority of your corporate data is not being properly leveraged. Modernize the data warehouse to get value from the 80% of unstructured data that goes unused.
    • Avoid rip and replace. Develop a future state that complements your existing data warehouse with emerging technologies.
    • Be flexible in your roadmap. Create an implementation roadmap that’s incremental and adapts to changing business priorities.

    Impact and Result

    • Establish both the business and IT perspectives of today’s data warehouse environment.
    • Explore the art-of-the-possible. Don’t get stuck trying to gather technical requirements from business users who don’t know what they don’t know. Use Info-Tech’s interview guide to discuss the pains of the current environment, and more importantly, where stakeholders want to be in the future.
    • Build an internal knowledgebase with respect to emerging technologies. The technology landscape is constantly shifting and often difficult for IT staff to keep track of. Use Info-Tech’s Data Warehouse Modernization Technology Education Deck to ensure that IT is able to appropriately match the right tools to the business’ use cases.
    • Create a compelling business case to secure investment and support.

    Build a Data Warehouse Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should be looking to modernize the relational data warehouse, review Info-Tech’s framework for identifying modernization opportunities, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Assess the current data warehouse environment

    Review the business’ perception and architecture of the current data warehouse environment.

    • Drive Business Innovation With a Modernized Data Warehouse Environment – Phase 1: Assess the Current Data Warehouse Environment
    • Data Warehouse Maturity Assessment Tool

    2. Define modernization drivers

    Collaborate with business users to identify the strongest motivations for data warehouse modernization.

    • Drive Business Innovation With a Modernized Data Warehouse Environment – Phase 2: Define Modernization Drivers
    • Data Warehouse Modernization Stakeholder Interview Guide
    • Data Warehouse Modernization Technology Education Deck
    • Data Warehouse Modernization Initiative Building Tool

    3. Create the modernization future state

    Combine business ideas with modernization initiatives and create a roadmap.

    • Drive Business Innovation With a Modernized Data Warehouse Environment – Phase 3: Create the Modernization Future State
    • Data Warehouse Modernization Technology Architectural Template
    • Data Warehouse Modernization Deployment Plan
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Build a Data Warehouse

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Assess the Current Data Warehouse Environment

    The Purpose

    Discuss the general project overview for data warehouse modernization.

    Establish the business and IT perspectives of the current state.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Holistic understanding of the current data warehouse.

    Business user engagement from the start of the project.

    Activities

    1.1 Review data warehouse project history.

    1.2 Evaluate data warehouse maturity.

    1.3 Draw architecture diagrams.

    1.4 Review supporting data management practices.

    Outputs

    Data warehouse maturity assessment

    Data architecture diagrams

    2 Explore Business Opportunities

    The Purpose

    Conduct a user workshop session to elicit the most pressing needs of business stakeholders.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Modernization technology selection is directly informed by business drivers.

    In-depth IT understanding of the business pains and opportunities.

    Activities

    2.1 Review general trends and drivers in your industry.

    2.2 Identify primary business frustrations, opportunities, and risks.

    2.3 Identify business processes to target for modernization.

    2.4 Capture business ideas for the future state.

    Outputs

    Business ideas for modernization

    Defined strategic direction for data warehouse modernization

    3 Review the Technology Landscape

    The Purpose

    Educate IT staff on the most common technologies for data warehouse modernization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Improved ability for IT to match technology with business ideas.

    Activities

    3.1 Appoint Modernization Advisors.

    3.2 Hold an open education and discussion forum for modernization technologies.

    Outputs

    Modernization Advisors identified

    Modernization technology education deck

    4 Define Modernization Solutions

    The Purpose

    Consolidate business ideas into modernization initiatives.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Refinement of the strategic direction for data warehouse modernization.

    Activities

    4.1 Match business ideas to technology solutions.

    4.2 Group similar ideas to create modernization initiatives.

    4.3 Create future-state architecture diagrams.

    Outputs

    Identified strategic direction for data warehouse modernization

    Defined modernization initiatives

    Future-state architecture for data warehouse

    5 Establish a Modernization Roadmap

    The Purpose

    Validate and build out initiatives with business users.

    Define benefits and costs to establish ROI.

    Identify enablers and barriers to modernization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Completion of materials for a compelling business case and roadmap.

    Activities

    5.1 Validate use cases with business users.

    5.2 Define initiative benefits.

    5.3 Identify enablers and barriers to modernization.

    5.4 Define preliminary activities for initiatives.

    5.5 Evaluate initiative costs.

    5.6 Determine overall ROI.

    Outputs

    Validated modernization initiatives

    Data warehouse modernization roadmap

    Reduce Manual Repetitive Work With IT Automation

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}458|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.5/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $34,099 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 2 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Operations Management
    • Parent Category Link: /i-and-o-process-management
    • IT staff are overwhelmed with manual repetitive work.
    • You have little time for projects.
    • You cannot move as fast as the business wants.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Optimize before you automate.
    • Foster an engineering mindset.
    • Build a process to iterate.

    Impact and Result

    • Begin by automating a few tasks with the highest value to score quick wins.
    • Define a process for rolling out automation, leveraging SDLC best practices.
    • Determine metrics and continually track the success of the automation program.

    Reduce Manual Repetitive Work With IT Automation Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read this Executive Brief to understand why you should reduce manual repetitive work with IT automation.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Identify automation candidates

    Select the top automation candidates to score some quick wins.

    • Reduce Manual Repetitive Work With IT Automation – Phase 1: Identify Automation Candidates
    • IT Automation Presentation
    • IT Automation Worksheet

    2. Map and optimize process flows

    Map and optimize process flows for each task you wish to automate.

    • Reduce Manual Repetitive Work With IT Automation – Phase 2: Map & Optimize Process Flows

    3. Build a process for managing automation

    Build a process around managing IT automation to drive value over the long term.

    • Reduce Manual Repetitive Work With IT Automation – Phase 3: Build a Process for Managing Automation

    4. Build automation roadmap

    Build a long-term roadmap to enhance your organization's automation capabilities.

    • Reduce Manual Repetitive Work With IT Automation – Phase 4: Build Automation Roadmap
    • IT Automation Roadmap
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Reduce Manual Repetitive Work With IT Automation

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Identify Automation Candidates

    The Purpose

    Identify top candidates for automation.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Plan to achieve quick wins with automation for early value.

    Activities

    1.1 Identify MRW pain points.

    1.2 Drill down pain points into tasks.

    1.3 Estimate the MRW involved in each task.

    1.4 Rank the tasks based on value and ease.

    1.5 Select top candidates and define metrics.

    1.6 Draft project charters.

    Outputs

    MRW pain points

    MRW tasks

    Estimate of MRW involved in each task

    Ranking of tasks for suitability for automation

    Top candidates for automation & success metrics

    Project charter(s)

    2 Map & Optimize Processes

    The Purpose

    Map and optimize the process flow of the top candidate(s).

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Requirements for automation of the top task(s).

    Activities

    2.1 Map process flows.

    2.2 Review and optimize process flows.

    2.3 Clarify logic and finalize future-state process flows.

    Outputs

    Current-state process flows

    Optimized process flows

    Future-state process flows with complete logic

    3 Build a Process for Managing Automation

    The Purpose

    Develop a lightweight process for rolling out automation and for managing the automation program.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Ability to measure and to demonstrate success of each task automation, and of the program as a whole.

    Activities

    3.1 Kick off your test plan for each automation.

    3.2 Define process for automation rollout.

    3.3 Define process to manage your automation program.

    3.4 Define metrics to measure success of your automation program.

    Outputs

    Test plan considerations

    Automation rollout process

    Automation program management process

    Automation program metrics

    4 Build Automation Roadmap

    The Purpose

    Build a roadmap to enhance automation capabilities.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A clear timeline of initiatives that will drive improvement in the automation program to reduce MRW.

    Activities

    4.1 Build a roadmap for next steps.

    Outputs

    IT automation roadmap

    Further reading

    Reduce Manual Repetitive Work With IT Automation

    Free up time for value-adding jobs.

    ANALYST PERSPECTIVE

    Automation cuts both ways.

    Automation can be very, very good, or very, very bad.
    Do it right, and you can make your life a whole lot easier.
    Do it wrong, and you can suffer some serious pain.
    All too often, automation is deployed willy-nilly, without regard to the overall systems or business processes in which it lives.
    IT professionals should follow a disciplined and consistent approach to automation to ensure that they maximize its value for their organization.

    Derek Shank,
    Research Analyst, Infrastructure & Operations
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive summary

    Situation

    • IT staff are overwhelmed with manual repetitive work.
    • You have little time for projects.
    • You cannot move as fast as the business wants.

    Complication

    • Automation is simple to say, but hard to implement.
    • Vendors claim automation will solve all your problems.
    • You have no process for managing automation.

    Resolution

    • Begin by automating a few tasks with the highest value to score quick wins.
    • Define a process for rolling out automation, leveraging SDLC best practices.
    • Determine metrics and continually track the success of the automation program.

    Info-Tech Insight

    1. Optimize before you automate.The current way isn’t necessarily the best way.
    2. Foster an engineering mindset.Your team members may not be process engineers, but they should learn to think like one.
    3. Build a process to iterate.Effective automation can't be a one-and-done. Define a lightweight process to manage your program.

    Infrastructure & operations teams are overloaded with work

    • DevOps and digital transformation initiatives demand increased speed.
    • I&O is still tasked with security and compliance and audit.
    • I&O is often overloaded and unable to keep up with demand.

    Manual repetitive work (MRW) sucks up time

    • Manual repetitive work is a fact of life in I&O.
    • DevOps circles refer to this type of work simply as “toil.”
    • Toil is like treading water: it must be done, but it consumes precious energy and effort just to stay in the same place.
    • Some amount of toil is inevitable, but it's important to measure and cap toil, so it does not end up overwhelming your team's whole capacity for engineering work.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Follow our methodology to focus IT automation on reducing toil.

    Manual hand-offs create costly delays

    • Every time there is a hand-off, we lose efficiency and productivity.
    • In addition to the cost of performing manual work itself, we must also consider the impact of lost productivity caused by the delay of waiting for that work to be performed.

    Every queue is a tire fire

    Queues create waste and are extremely damaging. Like a tire fire, once you get started, they’re almost impossible to stamp out!

    Increase queues if you want

    • “More overhead”
    • “Lower quality”
    • “More variability”
    • “Less motivation”
    • “Longer cycle time”
    • “Increased risk”

    (Source: Edwards, citing Donald G. Reinersten: The Principles of Product Development Flow: Second Generation Lean Product Development )

    Increasing complexity makes I&O’s job harder

    Every additional layer of complexity multiplies points of failure. Beyond a certain level of complexity, troubleshooting can become a nightmare.

    Today, Operations is responsible for the outcomes of a full stack of a very complex, software-defined, API-enabled system running on infrastructure they may or may not own.
    – Edwards

    Growing technical debt means an ever-rising workload

    • Enterprises naturally accumulate technical debt.
    • All technology requires care and feeding.
    • I&O cannot control how much technology it’s expected to support.
    • I&O faces a larger and larger workload as technical debt accumulates.

    The systems built under each new technology paradigm never fully replace the systems built under the old paradigms. It’s not uncommon for an enterprise to have an accumulation of systems built over 10-15 years and have no budget, risk appetite, or even a viable path to replace them all. With each shift, who bares [SIC] the brunt of the responsibility for making sure the old and the new hang together? Operations, of course. With each new advance, Operations juggles more complexity and more layers of legacy technologies than ever before.
    – Edwards

    Most IT shops can’t have a dedicated engineering team

    • In most organizations, the team that builds things is best equipped to support them.
    • Often the knowledge to design systems and the knowledge to run those systems naturally co-exists in the same personnel resources.
    • When your I&O team is trying to do engineering work, they can end up frequently interrupted to perform operational tasks.
    A Venn Diagram is depicted which compares People who build things with People who run things. the two circles are almost completely overlapping, indicating the strong connection between the two groups.

    Personnel resources in most IT organizations overlap heavily between “build” and “run.”

    IT operations must become an engineering practice

    • Usually you can’t double your staff or double their hours.
    • IT professionals must become engineers.
    • We do this by automating manual repetitive work and reducing toil.
    Two scenarios are depicted. The first scenario is found at a hypothetical work camp, in which one employee performs the task of manually splitting firewood with an axe. In order to split twice as much firewood, the employee would need to spend twice the time. The second scenario is Engineering Operations. in this scenario, a wood processor is used to automate the task, allowing far more wood to be split in same amount of time.

    Build your Sys Admin an Iron Man suit

    Some CIOs see a Sys Admin and want to replace them with a Roomba. I see a Sys Admin and want to build them an Iron Man suit.
    – Deepak Giridharagopal, CTO, Puppet

    Two Scenarios are depicted. In one, an employee is replaced by automation, represented by a Roomba, reducing costs by laying off a single employee. In the second scenario, the single employee is given automated tools to do their job, represented by an iron-man suit, leading to a 10X boost in employee productivity.

    Use automation to reduce risk

    Consistency

    When we automate, we can make sure we do something the same way every time and produce a consistent result.

    Auditing and Compliance

    We can design an automated execution that will ship logs that provide the context of the action for a detailed audit trail.

    Change

    • Enterprise environments are continually changing.
    • When context changes, so does the procedure.
    • You can update your docs all you want, but you can't make people read them before executing a procedure.
    • When you update the procedure itself, you can make sure it’s executed properly.

    Follow Info-Tech’s approach: Start small and snowball

    • It’s difficult for I&O to get the staffing resources it needs for engineering work.
    • Rather than trying to get buy-in for resources using a “top down” approach, Info-Tech recommends that I&O score some quick wins to build momentum.
    • Show success while giving your team the opportunity to build their engineering chops.

    Because the C-suite relies on upwards communication — often filtered and sanitized by the time it reaches them — executives don’t see the bottlenecks and broken processes that are stalling progress.
    – Andi Mann

    Info-Tech’s methodology employs a targeted approach

    • You aren’t going to automate IT operations end-to-end overnight.
    • In fact, such a large undertaking might be more effort than it’s worth.
    • Info-Tech’s methodology employs a targeted approach to identify which candidates will score some quick wins.
    • We’ll demonstrate success, gain momentum, and then iterate for continual improvement.

    Invest in automation to reap long-term rewards

    • All too often people think of automation like a vacuum cleaner you can buy once and then forget.
    • The reality is you need to perform care and feeding for automation like for any other process or program.
    • To reap the greatest rewards you must continually invest in automation – and invest wisely.

    To get the full ROI on your automation, you need to treat it like an employee. When you hire an employee, you invest in that person. You spend time and resources training and nurturing new employees so they can reach their full potential. The investment in a new employee is no different than your investment in automation.– Edwards

    Measure the success of your automation program

    Example of How to Estimate Dollar Value Impact of Automation
    Metric Timeline Target Value
    Hours of manual repetitive work 12 months 20% reduction $48,000/yr.(1)
    Hours of project capacity 18 months 30% increase $108,000/yr.(2)
    Downtime caused by errors 6 months 50% reduction $62,500/yr.(3)

    1 15 FTEs x 80k/yr.; 20% of time on MRW, reduced by 20%
    2 15 FTEs x 80k/yr.; 30% project capacity, increased by 30%
    3 25k/hr. of downtime.; 5 hours per year of downtime caused by errors

    Automating failover for disaster recovery

    CASE STUDY

    Industry Financial Services
    Source Interview

    Challenge

    An IT infrastructure manager had established DR failover procedures, but these required a lot of manual work to execute. His team lacked the expertise to build automation for the failover.

    Solution

    The manager hired consultants to build scripts that would execute portions of the failover and pause at certain points to report on outcomes and ask the human operator whether to proceed with the next step.

    Results

    The infrastructure team reduced their achievable RTOs as follows:
    Tier 1: 2.5h → 0.5h
    Tier 2: 4h → 1.5h
    Tier 3: 8h → 2.5h
    And now, anyone on the team could execute the entire failover!

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    “Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

    Workshop

    “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

    Consulting

    “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Reduce Manual Repetitive Work With IT Automation – project overview

    1. Select Candidates 2. Map Process Flows 3. Build Process 4. Build Roadmap
    Best-Practice Toolkit

    1.1 Identify MRW pain points

    1.2 Drill down pain points into tasks

    1.3 Estimate the MRW involved in each task

    1.4 Rank the tasks based on value and ease

    1.5 Select top candidates and define metrics

    1.6 Draft project charters

    2.1 Map process flows

    2.2 Review and optimize process flows

    2.3 Clarify logic and finalize future-state process flows

    3.1 Kick off your test plan for each automation

    3.2 Define process for automation rollout

    3.3 Define process to manage your automation program

    3.4 Define metrics to measure success of your automation program

    4.1 Build automation roadmap

    Guided Implementations

    Introduce methodology.

    Review automation candidates.

    Review success metrics.

    Review process flows.

    Review end-to-end process flows.

    Review testing considerations.

    Review automation SDLC.

    Review automation program metrics.

    Review automation roadmap.

    Onsite Workshop Module 1:
    Identify Automation Candidates
    Module 2:
    Map and Optimize Processes
    Module 3:
    Build a Process for Managing Automation
    Module 4:
    Build Automation Roadmap
    Phase 1 Results:
    Automation candidates and success metrics
    Phase 2 Results:
    End-to-end process flows for automation
    Phase 3 Results:
    Automation SDLC process, and automation program management process
    Phase 4 Results:
    Automation roadmap

    Improve Service Desk Ticket Intake

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}481|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Service Desk
    • Parent Category Link: /service-desk

    • Customers expect a consumer experience with IT. It won’t be long until this expectation expands to IT service support.
    • Messaging and threads are becoming central to how businesses organize information and conversations, but voice isn’t going away. It is still by far people’s favorite channel.
    • Tickets are becoming more complicated. BYOD, telework, and SaaS products present a perfect storm.
    • Traditional service metrics are not made for self service. Your mean-time-to-resolve will increase and first-contact resolution will decrease.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Bring the service desk to the people. Select channels that are most familiar to your users, and make it as easy possible to talk to a human.
    • Integrate channels. Users should have a consistent experience, and technicians should know user history.
    • Don’t forget the human aspect. People aren’t always good with technology. Allow them to contact a person if they are struggling.

    Impact and Result

    • Define which channels will be prioritized.
    • Identify improvements to these channels based on best practices and our members’ experiences.
    • Streamline your ticket intake process to remove unnecessary steps.
    • Prioritize improvements based on their value. Implement a set of improvements every quarter.

    Improve Service Desk Ticket Intake Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should improve your ticket intake, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Define and prioritize ticket channels

    Align your improvements with business goals and the shift-left strategy.

    • Improve Service Desk Ticket Intake – Phase 1: Define and Prioritize Ticket Channels
    • Service Desk Maturity Assessment
    • Service Desk Improvement Presentation Template

    2. Improve ticket channels

    Record potential improvements in your CSI Register, as you review best practices for each channel.

    • Improve Service Desk Ticket Intake – Phase 2: Improve Ticket Channels
    • Service Desk Continual Improvement Roadmap
    • Service Desk Ticket Intake Workflow Samples (Visio)
    • Service Desk Ticket Intake Workflow Samples (PDF)
    • Service Definition Checklist
    • Service Desk Site Visit Checklist Template

    3. Define next steps

    Streamline your ticket intake process and prioritize opportunities for improvement.

    • Improve Service Desk Ticket Intake – Phase 3: Define Next Steps
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Improve Service Desk Ticket Intake

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Optimize Ticket Channels

    The Purpose

    Brainstorm improvements to your systems and processes that will help you optimize.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Develop a single point of contact.

    Reduce the time before a technician can start productively working on a ticket.

    Enable Tier 1 and end users to complete more tickets.

    Activities

    1.1 Prioritize channels for improvement.

    1.2 Optimize the voice channel.

    1.3 Identify improvements for self service.

    1.4 Improve Tier 1 agents’ access to information.

    1.5 Optimize supplementary ticket channels.

    Outputs

    Action items to improve the voice channel.

    Populated CSI Register for self-service channels.

    Identified action items for the knowledgebase.

    Populated CSI Register for additional ticket channels.

    2 Streamline Ticket Intake

    The Purpose

    Create long-term growth by taking a sustainable approach to improvements.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Streamline your overall ticket intake process for incidents and service requests.

    Activities

    2.1 Map out the incident intake processes.

    2.2 Identify opportunities to streamline the incident workflow.

    2.3 Map out the request processes.

    2.4 Identify opportunities to streamline the request workflow.

    Outputs

    Streamlined incident intake process.

    Streamlined request intake process.

    Populated CSI Register for request intake.

    Integrate Physical Security and Information Security

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}383|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Security Processes & Operations
    • Parent Category Link: /security-processes-and-operations

    Physical security is often managed by facilities, not by IT security, resulting in segmented security systems. Integrating physical and information security introduces challenges in:

    • Understanding the value proposition of investment in governing and managing integrated systems, including migration costs, compared to separated security systems.
    • Addressing complex risks and vulnerabilities of an integrated security system.
    • Operationalizing enhanced capabilities created by adoption of emerging and disruptive technologies.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Integrate security in people, process, and technology to improve your overall security posture. Having siloed systems running security is not beneficial. Many organizations are realizing the benefits of consolidating into a single platform across physical security, cybersecurity, HR, legal, and compliance.
    • Plan and engage stakeholders. Assemble the right team to ensure the success of your integrated security ecosystem, decide the governance model, and clearly define the roles and responsibilities.
    • Enhance strategy and risk management. Strategically, we want a physical security system that is interoperable with most technologies, flexible with minimal customization, functional, and integrated, despite the challenges of proprietary configurations, complex customization, and silos.

    Impact and Result

    Info-Tech's approach is a modular, incremental, and repeatable process to integrate physical and information security to:

    • Ensure the integration will meet the business' needs and determine effort and technical requirements.
    • Establish GRC processes that include integrated risk management and compliance.
    • Design and deploy an integrated security architecture.
    • Establish security metrics of effectiveness and efficiency for senior management and leadership.

    Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Storyboard – A step-by-step document that walks you through how to integrate physical security and information security.

    Info-Tech provides a three-phased framework for integrating physical security and information security: Plan, Enhance, and Monitor & Optimize.

    • Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Storyboard

    2. Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool – A tool to map organizational goals to IT goals, facilities goals, OT goals (if applicable), and integrated security goals.

    This tool serves as a repository for information about security integration elements, compliance, and other factors that will influence your integration of physical security and information security.

    • Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool

    3. Integrate Physical Security and Information Security RACI Chart Tool – A tool to identify and understand the owners of various security integration stakeholders across the organization.

    Populating a RACI chart (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed) is a critical step that will assist you in organizing roles for carrying out integration steps. Complete this tool to assign tasks to suitable roles.

    • Integrate Physical Security and Information Security RACI Chart Tool

    4. Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Communication Deck – A tool to present your findings in a prepopulated document that summarizes the work you have completed.

    Complete this template to effectively communicate your integrated security plan to stakeholders.

    • Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Communication Deck
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Integrate Physical Security and Information Security

    Securing information security, physical security, or personnel security in silos may not secure much

    Analyst Perspective

    Ensure integrated security success with close and continual collaboration

    From physical access control systems (PACS) such as electronic locks and fingerprint biometrics to video surveillance systems (VSS) such as IP cameras to perimeter intrusion detection and prevention to fire and life safety and beyond: physical security systems pose unique challenges to overall security. Additionally, digital transformation of physical security to the cloud and the convergence of operational technology (OT), internet of things (IoT), and industrial IoT (IIoT) increase both the volume and frequency of security threats.

    These threats can be safety, such as the health impact when a gunfire attack downed wastewater pumps at Duke Energy Substation, North Carolina, US, in 2022. The threats can also be economic, such as theft of copper wire, or they can be reliability, such as when a sniper attack on Pacific Gas & Electric’s Metcalf Substation in California, US, damaged 17 out of 21 power transformers in 2013.

    Considering the security risks organizations face, many are unifying physical, cyber, and information security systems to gain the long-term overall benefits a consolidated security strategy provides.

    Ida Siahaan
    Ida Siahaan

    Research Director, Security and Privacy Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    Physical security is often managed by facilities, not by IT security, resulting in segmented security systems. Meanwhile, integrating physical and information security introduces challenges in:

    • Value proposition of investment in governing and managing integrated systems including the migration costs compared to separated security systems.
    • Addressing complex risks and vulnerabilities of an integrated security system.
    • Operationalizing on enhanced capabilities created by adoption of emerging and disruptive technologies.

    Common Obstacles

    Physical security systems integration is complex due to various components such as proprietary devices and protocols and hybrid systems of analog and digital technology. Thus, open architecture with comprehensive planning and design is important.

    However, territorial protection by existing IT and physical security managers may limit security visibility and hinder security integration.

    Additionally, integration poses challenges in staffing, training and awareness programs, and dependency on third-party technologies and their migration plans.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    Info-Tech’s approach is a modular, incremental, and repeatable process to integrate physical and information security that enables organizations to:

    • Determine effort and technical requirements to ensure the integration will meet the business needs.
    • Establish GRC processes including integrated risk management and compliance.
    • Design and deploy integrated security architecture.
    • Establish metrics to monitor the effectiveness and efficiency of the security program.

    Info-Tech Insight

    An integrated security architecture, including people, process, and technology, will improve your overall security posture. These benefits are leading many organizations to consolidate their siloed systems into a single platform across physical security, cybersecurity, HR, legal, and compliance.

    Existing information security models are not comprehensive

    Current security models do not cover all areas of security, especially if physical systems and personnel are involved and safety is also an important property required.

    • The CIA triad (confidentiality, integrity, availability) is a well-known information security model that focuses on technical policies related to technology for protecting information assets.
    • The US Government’s Five Pillars of Information Assurance includes CIA, authentication, and non-repudiation, but it does not cover people and processes comprehensively.
    • The AAA model, created by the American Accounting Association, has properties of authentication, authorization, and accounting but focuses only on access control.
    • Donn Parker expanded the CIA model with three more properties: possession, authenticity, and utility. This model, which includes people and processes, is known as the Parkerian hexad. However, it does not cover physical and personnel security.

    CIA Triad

    The CIA Triad for Information Security: Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability


    Parkerian Hexad

    The Parkerian Hexad for Security: Confidentiality, Possession, Utility, Availability, Authenticity and Integrity

    Sources: Parker, 1998; Pender-Bey, 2012; Cherdantseva and Hilton, 2015

    Adopt an integrated security model

    Adopt an integrated security model which consists of information security, physical security, personnel security, and organizational security.

    The security ecosystem is shifting from segregation to integration

    Security ecosystem is shifting from the past proprietary model to open interfaces and future open architecture

    Sources: Cisco, n.d.; Preparing for Technology Convergence in Manufacturing, Info-Tech Research Group, 2018

    Physical security includes:

    • Securing physical access,
      e.g. facility access control, alarms, surveillance cameras
    • Securing physical operations
      (operational technology – OT), e.g. programmable logic controllers (PLCs), SCADA

    Info-Tech Insight

    Why is integrating physical and information security gaining more and more traction? Because the supporting technologies are becoming more matured. This includes, for example, migration of physical security devices to IP-based network and open architecture.

    Reactive responses to physical security incidents

    April 1995

    Target: Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building, Oklahoma, US. Method: Bombing. Impact: Destroyed structure of 17 federal agencies, 168 casualties, over 800 injuries. Result: Creation of Interagency Security Committee (ISC) in Executive Order 12977 and “Vulnerability Assessment of Federal Facilities” standard.
    (Source: Office of Research Services, 2017)

    April 2013

    Target: Pacific Gas & Electric’s Metcalf Substation, California, US. Method: Sniper attack. Impact: Out of 21 power transformers, 17 were damaged. Result: Creation of Senate Bill No. 699 and NERC- CIP-014 standard.
    (Source: T&D World, 2023)

    Sep. 2022

    Target: Nord Stream gas pipelines connecting Russia to Germany, Baltic sea. Method: Detonations. Impact: Methane leaks (~300,000 tons) at four exclusive economic zones (two in Denmark and two in Sweden). Result: Sweden’s Security Service investigation.
    (Source: CNBC News, 2022)

    Dec. 2022

    Target: Duke Energy Substation, North Carolina, US. Method: Gunfire. Impact: Power outages of ~40,000 customers and wastewater pumps in sewer lift stations down. Result: State of emergency was declared.
    (Source: CBS News, 2022)

    Info-Tech Insight

    When it comes to physical security, we have been mostly reactive. Typically the pattern starts with physical attacks. Next, the impacted organization mitigates the incidents. Finally, new government regulatory measures or private sector or professional association standards are put in place. We must strive to change our pattern to become more proactive.

    Physical security market forecast and top physical security challenges

    Physical security market forecast
    (in billions USD)

    A forecast by MarketsandMarkets projected growth in the physical security market, using historical data from 2015 until 2019, with a CAGR of 6.4% globally and 5.2% in North America.

    A forecast by MarketsandMarkets projected growth in the physical security market, using historical data from 2015 until 2019, with a CAGR of 6.4% globally and 5.2% in North America.

    Source: MarketsandMarkets, 2022

    Top physical security challenges

    An Ontic survey (N=359) found that threat data management (40%) was the top physical security challenge in 2022, up from 33% in 2021, followed by physical security threats to the C-suite and company leadership (35%), which was a slight increase from 2021. An interesting decrease is data protection and privacy (32%), which dropped from 36% in 2021.

    An Ontic survey (N=359) found that threat data management (40%) was the top physical security challenge in 2022, up from 33% in 2021, followed by physical security threats to the C-suite and company leadership (35%), which was a slight increase from 2021. An interesting decrease is data protection and privacy (32%), which dropped from 36% in 2021.

    Source: Ontic Center for Protective Intelligence, 2022

    Info-Tech Insight

    The physical security market is growing in systems and services, especially the integration of threat data management with cybersecurity.

    Top physical security initiatives and operations integration investments

    We know the physical security challenges and how the physical security market is growing, but what initiatives are driving this growth? These are the top physical security initiatives and top investments for physical security operations integration:

    Top physical security initiatives

    The number one physical security initiative is integrating physical security systems. Other initiatives with similar concerns included data and cross-functional integration

    A survey by Brivo asked 700 security professionals about their top physical security initiatives. The number one initiative is integrating physical security systems. Other initiatives with similar concerns included data and cross-functional integration.

    Source: Brivo, 2022

    Top investments for physical security operations integration

    The number one investment is on access control systems with software to identify physical threat actors. Another area with similar concern is integration of digital physical security with cybersecurity.

    An Ontic survey (N=359) on areas of investment for physical security operations integration shows the number one investment is on access control systems with software to identify physical threat actors. Another area with similar concern is integration of digital physical security with cybersecurity.

    Source: Ontic Center for Protective Intelligence, 2022

    Evaluate security integration opportunities with these guiding principles

    Opportunity focus

    • Identify the security integration problems to solve with visible improvement possibilities
    • Don’t choose technology for technology’s sake
    • Keep an eye to the future
    • Use strategic foresight

    Piece by piece

    • Avoid taking a big bang approach
    • Test technologies in multiple conditions
    • Run inexpensive pilots
    • Increase flexibility
    • Build a technology ecosystem

    Buy-in

    • Collaborate with stakeholders
    • Gain and sustain support
    • Maintain transparency
    • Increase uptake of open architecture

    Key Recommendations:

    Focus on your master plan

    Build a technology ecosystem

    Engage stakeholders

    Info-Tech Insight

    When looking for a quick win, consider learning the best internal or external practice. For example, in 1994 IBM reorganized its security operation by bringing security professionals and non-security professionals in one single structure, which reduced costs by approximately 30% in two years.

    Sources: Create and Implement an IoT Strategy, Info-Tech Research Group, 2022; Baker and Benny, 2013; Erich Krueger, Omaha Public Power District (contributor); Doery Abdou, March Networks Corporate (contributor)

    Case Study

    4Wall Entertainment – Asset Owner

    Industry: Architecture & Engineering
    Source: Interview

    4Wall Entertainment is quite mature in integrating its physical and information security; physical security has always been under IT as a core competency.

    4Wall Entertainment is a provider of entertainment lighting and equipment to event venues, production companies, lighting designers, and others, with a presence in 18 US and UK locations.

    After many acquisitions, 4Wall Entertainment needed to standardize its various acquired systems, including physical security systems such as access control. In its integrated security approach, IT owns the integrated security, but they interface with related entities such as HR, finance, and facilities management in every location. This allows them to obtain information such as holidays, office hours, and what doors need to be accessed as inputs to the security system and to get sponsorship in budgeting.

    In the past, 4Wall Entertainment tried delegating specific physical security to other divisions, such as facilities management and HR. This approach was unsuccessful, so IT took back the responsibility and accountability.

    Currently, 4Wall Entertainment works with local vendors, and its biggest challenge is finding third-party vendors that can provide nationwide support.

    In the future, 4Wall Entertainment envisions physical security modernization such as camera systems that allow more network accessibility, with one central system to manage and IoT device integration with SIEM and MDR.

    Results

    Lessons learned in integrating security from 4Wall Entertainment include:

    • Start with forming relationships with related divisions such as HR, finance, and facilities management to build trust and encourage sponsorship across management.
    • Create policies, procedures, and standards to deploy in various systems, especially when acquiring companies with low maturity in security.
    • Select third-party providers that offer the required functionalities, good customer support, and standard systems interoperability.
    • Close skill gaps by developing training and awareness programs for users, especially for newly acquired systems and legacy systems, or by acquiring expertise from consulting services.
    • Complete cost-benefit analysis for solutions on legacy systems to determine whether to keep them and create interfacing with other systems, upgrade them, or replace them entirely with newer systems.
    • Delegate maintenance of specific highly regulated systems, such as fire alarms and water sprinklers, to facilities management.
    Integration of Physical and Information Security Framework. Inputs: Integrated Items, Stakeholders, and Security Components. Phases, Outcomes and Benefits: Plan, Enhance and Monitor & Optimize.

    Tracking progress of physical and information security integration

    Physical security is often part of facilities management. As a result, there are interdependencies with both internal departments (such as IT, information security, and facilities) and external parties (such as third-party vendors). IT leaders, security leaders, and operational leaders should keep the big picture in mind when designing and implementing integration of physical and information security. Use this checklist as a tool to track your security integration journey.

    Plan

    • Engage stakeholders and justify value for the business.
    • Define roles and responsibilities.
    • Establish/update governance for integrated security.
    • Identify integrated elements and compliance obligations.

    Enhance

    • Determine the level of security maturity and update security strategy for integrated security.
    • Assess and treat risks of integrated security.
    • Establish/update integrated physical and information security policies and procedures.
    • Update incident response, disaster recovery, and business continuity plan.

    Monitor & Optimize

    • Identify skill requirements and close skill gaps for integrating physical and information security.
    • Design and deploy integrated security architecture and controls.
    • Establish, monitor, and report integrated security metrics on effectiveness and efficiency.

    Benefits of the security integration framework

    Today’s matured technology makes security integration possible. However, the governance and management of single integrated security presents challenges. These can be overcome using a multi-phased framework that enables a modular, incremental, and repeatable integration process, starting with planning to justify the value of investment, then enhancing the integrated security based on risks and open architecture. This is followed by using metrics for monitoring and optimization.

    1. Modular

      • Implementing a consolidated security strategy is complex and involves the integration of process, software, data, hardware, and network and infrastructure.
      • A modular framework will help to drive value while putting in appropriate guardrails.
    2. Incremental

      • Integration of physical security and information security involves many components such as security strategy, risk management, and security policies.
      • An incremental framework will help track, manage, and maintain each step while providing appropriate structure.
    3. Repeatable

      • Integration of physical security and information security is a journey that can be approached with a pilot program to evaluate effectiveness.
      • A repeatable framework will help to ensure quick time to value and enable immediate implementation of controls to meet operational and security requirements.

    Potential risks of the security integration framework

    Just as medicine often comes with side effects, our Integration of Physical and Information Security Framework may introduce risks too. However, as John F. Kennedy, thirty-fifth president of the United States, once said, "There are risks and costs to a program of action — but they are far less than the long-range cost of comfortable inaction."

    Plan Phase

    • Lack of transparency in the integration process can lead to lack of trust among stakeholders.
    • Lack of support from leadership results in unclear governance or lack of budget or human resources.
    • Key stakeholders leave the organization during the engagement and their replacements do not understand the organization’s operation yet.

    Enhance Phase

    • The risk assessment conducted focuses too much on IT risk, which may not always be applicable to physical security systems nor OT systems.
    • The integrated security does not comply with policies and regulations.

    Monitor and Optimize Phase

    • Lack of knowledge, training, and awareness.
    • Different testing versus production environments.
    • Lack of collected or shared security metrics.

    Data

    • Data quality issues and inadequate data from physical security, information security, and other systems, e.g. OT, IoT.
    • Too much data from too many tools are complex and time consuming to process.

    Develop an integration of information security, physical security, and personnel security that meets your organization’s needs

    Integrate security in people, process, and technology to improve your overall security posture

    Having siloed systems running security is not beneficial. Many organizations are realizing the benefits of consolidating into a single platform across physical security, cybersecurity, HR, legal, and compliance.

    Plan and engage stakeholders

    Assemble the right team to ensure the success of your integrated security ecosystem, decide the governance model, and clearly define the roles and responsibilities.

    Enhance strategy and risk management

    Strategically, we want a physical security system that is interoperable with most technologies, flexible with minimal customization, functional, and integrated, despite the challenges of proprietary configurations, complex customization, and silos.

    Monitor and optimize

    Find the most optimized architecture that is strategic, realistic, and based on risk. Next, perform an evaluation of the security systems and program by understanding what, where, when, and how to measure and to report the relevant metrics.

    Focus on master plan

    Identify the security integration problems to solve with visible improvement possibilities, and don’t choose technology for technology’s sake. Design first, then conduct market research by comparing products or services from vendors or manufacturers.

    Build a technology ecosystem

    Avoid a big bang approach and test technologies in multiple conditions. Run inexpensive pilots and increase flexibility to build a technology ecosystem.

    Deliverables

    Each step of this framework is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool

    Map organizational goals to IT goals, facilities goals, OT goals (if applicable), and integrated security goals. Identify your security integration elements and compliance.

    Integrate Physical Security and Information Security RACI Chart Tool

    Identify various security integration stakeholders across the organization and assign tasks to suitable roles.

    Key deliverable:

    Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Communication Deck

    Present your findings in a prepopulated document that summarizes the work you have completed.

    Plan

    Planning is foundational to engage stakeholders. Start with justifying the value of investment, then define roles and responsibilities, update governance, and finally identify integrated elements and compliance obligations.

    Plan

    Engage stakeholders

    • To initiate communication between the physical and information security teams and other related divisions, it is important to identify the entities that would be affected by the security integration and involve them in the process to gain support from planning to delivery and maintenance.
    • Possible stakeholders:
      • Executive leadership, Facilities Management leader and team, IT leader, Security & Privacy leader, compliance officer, Legal, Risk Management, HR, Finance, OT leader (if applicable)
    • A successful security integration depends on aligning your security integration initiatives and migration plan to the organization’s objectives by engaging the right people to communicate and collaborate.

    Info-Tech Insight

    It is important to speak the same language. Physical security concerns safety and availability, while information security concerns confidentiality and integrity. Thus, the two systems have different goals and require alignment.

    Similarly, taxonomy of terminologies needs to be managed,1 e.g. facility management with an emergency management background may have a different understanding from a CISO with an information security background when discussing the same term. For example:

    In emergency management prevention means “actions taken to eliminate the impact of disasters in order to protect lives, property and the environment, and to avoid economic disruption.”2

    In information security prevention is “preventing the threats by understanding the threat environment and the attack surfaces, the risks, the assets, and by maintaining a secure system.”3

    Sources: 1 Owen Yardley, Omaha Public Power District (contributor); 2 Translation Bureau, Government of Canada, n.d.; 3 Security Intelligence, 2020


    Map organizational goals to integrated security goals

    Input

    • Corporate, IT, and Facilities strategies

    Output

    • Your goals for the integrated security strategy

    Materials

    • Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool

    Participants

    • Executive leadership
    • Facilities Management leader and team
    • IT leader
    • Security & Privacy leader
    • Compliance officer
    • Legal
    • Risk Management
    • HR & Finance
    • OT leader (if applicable)
    1. As a group, brainstorm organization goals.
      • Review relevant corporate, IT, and facilities strategies.
    2. Record the most important business goals in the “Goals Cascade” tab of the Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool. Try to limit the number of business goals to no more than ten goals. This limitation will be critical to helping focus on your integrated security goals.
    3. For each goal, identify one to two security alignment goals. These should be objectives for the security strategy that will support the identified organization goals.

    Download the Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool.

    Record organizational goals

    A table to identify Organization, IT, OT(if applicable), Facilities, and Security Goals Definitions.

    Refer to the Integration of Physical and Information Security Framework when filling in the table.

    1. Record your identified organizational goals in the “Goals Cascade” tab of the Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool.
    2. For each organizational goal, identify IT alignment goals.
    3. For each organizational goal, identify OT alignment goals (if applicable).
    4. For each organizational goal, identify Facilities alignment goals.
    5. For each organizational goal, select an integrated security goal from the drop-down menu.

    Justify value for the business

    Facilities in most cases have a team that is responsible for physical security installations such as access key controllers. Whenever there is an issue, they contact the provider to fix the error. However, with smart buildings and smart devices, the threat surface grows to include information security threats, and Facilities may not possess the knowledge and skills required to deal with them. At the same time, delegating physical security to IT may add more tasks to their already-too-long list of responsibilities. Consolidating security to a focused security team that covers both physical and information security can help.1 We need to develop the security integration business case beyond physical security "gates, guns, and guards" mentality.2

    An example of a cost-benefit analysis for security integration:

    Benefits

    Metrics

    Operational Efficiency and Cost Savings

    • Reduction in deployment, maintenance, and staff time in manual operations of physical security devices such as logs collection from analog cameras to be automated into digital.
    • Reduction in staffing costs by bringing physical security SOC and information security SOC in one single structure.

    Reliability Improvements

    • Reduction in field crew time by identifying hardware that can be virtualized to have a centralized remote control.
    • Improvement of operating reliability through continuous and real-time monitoring of equipment such as door access control systems and camera surveillance systems.

    Customers & Users Benefits

    • Improvement of customer safety for essential services such as access to critical locations only by authorized personnel.
    • Improvement of reliability of services and address human factor in adoption of change by introducing change as a friendly activity.

    Cost

    Metrics

    Equipment and Infrastructure

    • Upgrade of existing physical security equipment, e.g. replacement of separated access control, video management system (VMS), and physical access control system (PACS) with a unified security platform.
    • Implementation of communication network equipment and labor to install, configure, and maintain the new network component.

    Software and Commission

    • The software and maintenance fee as well as upgrade implementation project cost.
    • Labor cost of field commissioning and troubleshooting.
    • Integration with security systems, e.g. event and log management, continuous monitoring, and investigation.

    Support and Resources

    • Cost to hire/outsource security FTEs for ongoing management and operation of security devices, e.g. SOC, MSSP.
    • Cost to hire/outsource FTEs to analyze, design, and deploy the integrated security architecture, e.g. consulting fee.

    Sources: 1 Andrew Amaro, KLAVAN Security Services (contributor); 2 Baker and Benny, 2013;
    Industrial Control System Modernization, Info-Tech Research Group, 2023; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2021

    Plan

    Define roles and responsibilities

    Input

    • List of relevant stakeholders

    Output

    • Roles and responsibilities for the integration of physical and information security program

    Materials

    • Integrate Physical Security and Information Security RACI Chart Tool

    Participants

    • Executive leadership
    • Facilities Management leader and team
    • HR & Finance
    • IT leader and team
    • OT leader and team
    • Security & Privacy leader and team

    Many factors impact an organization’s level of effectiveness as it relates to integration of physical and information security. How the team interacts, what skill sets exist, the level of clarity around roles and responsibilities, and the degree of executive support and alignment are only a few. Thus, we need to identify stakeholders that are:

    • Responsible: The person(s) who does the work to accomplish the activity; they have been tasked with completing the activity and/or getting a decision made.
    • Accountable: The person(s) who is accountable for the completion of the activity. Ideally, this is a single person and is often an executive or program sponsor.
    • Consulted: The person(s) who provides information. This is usually several people, typically called subject matter experts (SMEs).
    • Informed: The person(s) who is updated on progress. These are resources that are affected by the outcome of the activities and need to be kept up to date.

    Download the Integrate Physical Security and Information Security RACI Chart Tool

    Define RACI chart

    Define Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed (RACI) stakeholders.

    1. Customize the Work Units to best reflect your operation with applicable stakeholders.
    2. Customize the Action rows as required.

    Integrate Physical Security and Information Security RACI Chart

    Sources: ISC, 2015; ISC, 2021

    Info-Tech Insight

    The roles and responsibilities should be clearly defined. For example, IT Security should be responsible for the installation and configuration of all physical access controllers and devices, and facility managers should be responsible for the physical maintenance including malfunctioning such as access device jammed or physically broken.

    Plan

    Establish/update governance for integrated security

    HR & Finance

    HR provides information such as new hires and office hours as input to the security system. Finance assists in budgeting.

    Security & Privacy

    The security and privacy team will need to evaluate solutions and enforce standards on various physical and information security systems and to protect data privacy.

    Business Leaders

    Business stakeholders will provide clarity for their strategy and provide input into how they envision security furthering those goals.

    IT Executives

    IT stakeholders will be a driving force, ensuring all necessary resources are available and funded.

    Facilities/ Operations

    Operational plans will include asset management, monitoring, and support to meet functional goals and manage throughout the asset lifecycle.

    Infrastructure & Enterprise Architects

    Each solution added to the environment will need to be chosen and architected to meet business goals and security functions.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Assemble the right team to ensure the success of your integrated security ecosystem and decide the governance model, e.g. security steering committee (SSC) or a centralized single structure.

    Adapted from Create and Implement an IoT Strategy, Info-Tech Research Group, 2022

    What does the SSC do?

    Ensuring proper governance over your security program is a complex task that requires ongoing care and feeding from executive management to succeed.

    Your SSC should aim to provide the following core governance functions for your security program:

    1. Define Clarity of Intent and Direction

      How does the organization’s security strategy support the attainment of the business, IT, facilities management, and physical and information security strategies? The SSC should clearly define and communicate strategic linkage and provide direction for aligning security initiatives with desired outcomes.
    2. Establish Clear Lines of Authority

      Security programs contain many important elements that need to be coordinated. There must be clear and unambiguous authority, accountability, and responsibility defined for each element so lines of reporting/escalation are clear and conflicting objectives can be mediated.
    3. Provide Unbiased Oversight

      The SSC should vet the organization’s systematic monitoring processes to ensure there is adherence to defined risk tolerance levels and that monitoring is appropriately independent from the personnel responsible for implementing and managing the security program.
    4. Optimize Security Value Delivery

      Optimized value delivery occurs when strategic objectives for security are achieved and the organization’s acceptable risk posture is attained at the lowest possible cost. This requires constant attention to ensure controls are commensurate with any changes in risk level or appetite.

    Adapted from Improve Security Governance With a Security Steering Committee , Info-Tech Research Group, 2018

    Plan

    Identify integrated elements and compliance obligations

    To determine what elements need to be integrated, it’s important to scope the security integration program and to identify the consequences of integration for compliance obligations.

    INTEGRATED ELEMENTS

    What are my concerns?

    Process integrations

    Determine which processes need to be integrated and how

    • Examples: Security prevention, detection, and response; risk assessment

    Software and data integration

    Determine which software and data need to be integrated and how

    • Examples: Threat management tools, SIEM, IDPS, security event logs

    Hardware integration

    Determine which hardware needs to be integrated and how

    • Examples: Sensors, alarms, cameras, keys, locks, combinations, and card readers

    Network and infrastructure

    Determine which network and infrastructure components need to be integrated and how

    • Example: Network segmentation for physical access controllers.

    COMPLIANCE

    How can I address my concerns?

    Regulations

    Adhere to mandatory laws, directives, industry standards, specific contractual obligations, etc.

    • Examples: NERC CIP (North American Utilities), Network and Information Security (NIS) Directive (EU), Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 (UK), Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1970 (US), Emergency Management Act, 2007 (Canada)

    Standards

    Adhere to voluntary standards and obligations

    • Examples: NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF), The Risk Management Process for Federal Facilities: An Interagency Security Committee Standard (US), Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC), Service Organization Control (SOC 1 and 2)

    Guidelines

    Adopt guidelines that can improve the integrated security program

    • Examples: Best Practices for Planning and Managing Physical Security Resources (US Interagency Security Committee), Information Security Manual - Guidelines for Physical Security (Australian Cyber Security Centre), 1402-2021-Guide for Physical Security of Electric Power Substations (IEEE)

    Record integrated elements

    Scope and Boundaries from the Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool.

    Refer to the “Scope” tab of the Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool when filling in the following elements.

    1. Record your integrated elements, i.e. process integration, software and data integration, hardware integration, network and infrastructure, and physical scope of your security integration, in the “Scope” tab of the Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool.
    2. For each of your scoping give the rationale for including them in the Comments column. Careful attention should be paid to any elements that are not in scope.

    Record your compliance obligations

    Refer to the “Compliance Obligations” tab of the Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool.

    1. Identify your compliance obligations. These can include both mandatory and voluntary obligations. Mandatory obligations include:
      • Laws
      • Government regulations
      • Industry standards
      • Contractual agreements
      Voluntary obligations include standards that the organization has chosen to follow for best practices and any obligations that are required to maintain certifications. Organizations will have many different compliance obligations. For the purposes of your integrated security, include those that include physical security requirements.
    2. Record your compliance obligations, along with any notes, in your copy of the Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool.
    3. Refer to the “Compliance DB” tab for lists of standards/regulations/ guidelines.
    The “Compliance Obligations” tab of the Integrate Physical Security and Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool.

    Remediate third-party compliance gaps

    If you have third-party compliance gaps, there are four primary ways to eliminate them:

    1. Find a New, Compliant Partner

      Terminate existing contract and find another organization to partner with.
    2. Bring the Capability In-House

      Expense permitting, this may be the best way to protect yourself.
    3. Demand Compliance

      Tell the third party they must become compliant. Make sure you set a deadline.
    4. Accept Noncompliance and Assume the Risk

      Sometimes remediation just isn’t cost effective and you have no choice.

    Follow Contracting Best Practices to Mitigate the Risk of Future Third-Party Compliance Gaps

    1. Perform Initial Due Diligence: Request proof of third-party compliance prior to entering into a contract.
    2. Perform Ongoing Due Diligence: Request proof of third-party contractor compliance annually.
    3. Contract Negotiation: Insert clauses requesting periodic assertions of compliance.

    View a sample contract provided by the US Department of Health and Human Services.

    Source: Take Control of Compliance Improvement to Conquer Every Audit, Info-Tech Research Group, 2015

    Pitfalls to avoid when planning security integration

    • No Resources Lineups

      Integration of security needs support from leadership, proper planning, and clear and consistent communication across the organization.
    • Not Addressing Holistic Security

      Create policies and procedures and follow standards that are holistic and based on threats and risks, e.g. consolidated access control policies.
    • Lack of Governance

      While the IT department is a critical partner in cybersecurity, the ownership of such a role sits squarely in the organizational C-suite, with regular reporting to the board of directors (if applicable).
    • Overlooking Business Continuity Effort

      IT and physical security are integral to business continuity and disaster recovery strategies.
    • Not Having Relevant Training and Awareness

      Provide a training and awareness program based on relevant attack vectors. Trained employees are key assets to the development of a safe and secure environment. They must form the base of your security culture.
    • Overbuilding or Underbuilding

      Select third-party providers that offer systems interoperability with other security tools. The intent is to promote a unified approach to security to avoid a cumbersome tooling zoo.

    Sources: Real Time Networks, 2022; Andrew Amaro, KLAVAN Security Services (contributor)

    Enhance

    Enhancing is the development of an integrated security strategy, policies, procedures, BCP, DR, and IR based on the organization’s risks.

    Enhance

    Determine the level of security maturity and update the security strategy

    • Before updating your security strategies, you need to understand the organization’s business strategies, IT strategies, facilities strategies, and physical and information security strategies. The goal is to align your integrated security strategies to contribute to your organization’s success.
    • The integrated security leaders need to understand the direction of the organization. For example:
      • Growth expectation
      • Expansions or mergers anticipation
      • Product or service changes
      • Regulatory requirements
    • Wise security investments depend on aligning your security initiatives to the organization’s objectives by supporting operational performance and ensuring brand protection and shareholder values.
    Integrated security strategies. Consists of an organization’s business strategies, IT strategies, facilities strategies, and physical and information security strategies.

    Sources: Amy L. Meger, Platte River Power Authority (contributor); Baker and Benny, 2013; IFSEC Global, 2023; Security Priorities 2023, Info-Tech Research Group, 2023; Build an Information Security Strategy, Info-Tech Research Group, 2020; ISC, n.d.

    Understanding security maturity

    Maturity models are very effective for determining security states. This table provides examples of general descriptions for physical and information security maturity levels.

    Determine which framework is suitable and select the description that most accurately reflects the ideal state for security in your organization.

    Level 1

    Level 2

    Level 3

    Level 4

    Level 5

    Minimum security with simple physical barriers. Low-level security to prevent and detect some unauthorized external activity. Medium security to prevent, detect, and assess most unauthorized external activity and some unauthorized internal activity. High-level security to prevent, detect, and assess most unauthorized external and internal activity. Maximum security to prevent, detect, assess, and neutralize all unauthorized external and internal activity.

    Physical security maturity level1

    Initial/Ad hoc security programs are reactive. Developing security programs can be effective at what they do but are not holistic. A defined security program is holistic, documented, and proactive. Managed security programs have robust governance and metrics processes. An optimized security program is based on strong risk management practices, including the production of key risk indicators (KRIs).

    Information security maturity level2

    Sources: 1 Fennelly, 2013; 2 Build an Information Security Strategy, Info-Tech Research Group, 2020

    Enhance

    Assess and treat integrated security risks

    The risk assessment conducted consists of analyzing existing inherent risks, existing pressure to the risks such as health and safety laws and codes of practice, new risks from the integration process, risk tolerance, and countermeasures.

    • Some organizations already integrate security into corporate security that consists of risk management, compliance, governance, information security, personnel security, and physical security. However, some organizations are still separating security components, especially physical security and information security, which limits security visibility and the organization’s ability to complete a comprehensive risks assessment.
    • Many vendors are also segregating physical security and information security solutions because their tools do well only on certain aspects. This forces organizations to combine multiple tools, creating a complex environment.
    • Additionally, risks related to people such as mental health issues must be addressed properly. The prevalence of hybrid work post-pandemic makes this aspect especially important.
    • Assess and treat risks based on the organization’s requirements, including its environments. For example, the US federal facility security organization is required to conduct risk assessments at least every five years for Level I (lowest risk) and Level II facilities and at least every three years for Level III, IV, and V (highest risk) facilities.

    Sources: EPA, n.d.; America's Water Infrastructure Act (AWIA), 2018; ISC, 2021

    “In 2022, 95% of US companies are consolidating into a single platform across physical security, cybersecurity, HR, legal and compliance.”

    Source: Ontic Center for Protective Intelligence, 2022; N=359

    Example risk levels

    The risk assessment conducted is based on a combination of physical and information security factors such as certain facilities factors. The risk level can be used to determine the baseline level of protection (LOP). Next, the baseline LOP is customized to the achievable LOP. The following is an example for federal facilities determined by Interagency Security Committee (ISC).

    Risk factor, points and score. Facility security level (FSL), level of risk, and baseline level of protection.

    Source: ISC, 2021

    Example assets

    It is important to identify the organization’s requirements, including its environments (IT, IoT, OT, facilities, etc.), and to measure and evaluate its risks and threats using an appropriate risk framework and tools with the critical step of identifying assets prior to acquiring solutions.

    Organizational requirements including its environments(IT, loT, OT, facilities, etc.)

    Info-Tech Insight

    Certain exceptions must be identified in risk assessment. Usually physical barriers such as gates and intrusion detection sensors are considered as countermeasures,1 however, under certain assessment, e.g. America's Water Infrastructure Act (AWIA),2 physical barriers are also considered assets and as such must also be assessed.

    Compromising a fingerprint scanner

    An anecdotal example of why physical security alone is not sufficient.

    Biometrics: secure access and data security.

    Image by Rawpixel.com on Freepik

    Lessons learned from using fingerprints for authentication:

    • Fingerprint scanners can be physically circumvented by making a copy an authorized user’s fingerprint with 3D printing or even by forcefully amputating an authorized user’s finger.
    • Authorized users may not be given access when the fingerprint cannot be recognized, e.g. if the finger is covered by bandage due to injury.
    • Integration with information security may help detect unauthorized access, e.g. a fingerprint being scanned in a Canadian office when the same user was scanned at a close time interval from an IP in Europe will trigger an alert of a possible incident.

    Info-Tech Insight

    In an ideal world, we want a physical security system that is interoperable with all technologies, flexible with minimal customization, functional, and integrated. In the real world, we may have physical systems with proprietary configurations that are not easily customized and siloed.

    Source: Robert Dang, Info-Tech Research Group

    Use case: Microchip implant

    Microchip implants can be used instead of physical devices such as key cards for digital identity and access management. Risks can be assessed using quantitative or qualitative approaches. In this use case a qualitative approach is applied to impact and likelihood, and a quantitative approach is applied to revenue and cost.

    Asset: Microchip implant

    Benefits

    Impact

    • Improve user satisfaction by removing the need to carry key cards, IDs, etc.
    • Improve operating reliability by reducing the likelihood of losing physical devices such as key cards.
    • Improve reliability of services through continuous and real-time connection with other systems such as payment system.

    Likelihood

    • Improve user satisfaction: High
    • Improve operating reliability: High
    • Improve reliability of services: High

    Revenue

    • Acquire new customers or retain existing customers by making daily lives easier with no need to carry key cards, IDs, etc.
    • Cost reduction in staffing of security personnel, e.g. reducing the staffing of building guards or receptionist.

    Risks

    Impact

    • Security: issues such as biohacking of wearable technology and interconnected devices.
    • Safety: issues such as infections or reactions in the body's immune system.
    • Privacy: issues such as unauthorized surveillance and tracking of activities.

    Likelihood

    • Biohacking: Medium
    • Infections: Low
    • Surveillance: High

    Cost

    • Installation costs and hardware costs.
    • Overall lifecycle cost including estimated software and maintenance costs.
    • Estimated cost of training and estimated increase in productivity.

    Sources: Business Insider, 2018; BBC News, 2022; ISC, 2015

    Enhance

    Update integrated security policies and procedures

    Global policies with local implementation

    This model works for corporate groups with a parent company. In this model, global security policies are developed by a parent company and local policies are applied to the unique business that is not supported by the parent company.

    Update of existing security policies

    This model works for organizations with sufficient resources. In this model, integrated security policies are derived from various policies. For example, physical security in smart buildings/devices (sensors, automated meters, HVAC, etc.) and OT systems (SCADA, PLCs, RTUs, etc.) introduce unique risk exposures, necessitating updates to security policies.

    Customization of information security policies

    This model works for smaller organizations with limited resources. In this model, integrated security policies are derived from information security policies. The issue is when these policies are not applicable to physical security systems or other environments, e.g. OT systems.

    Sources: Kris Krishan, Waymo (contributor); Isabelle Hertanto, Info-Tech Research Group (contributor); Physical and Environmental Security Policy Template, Info-Tech Research Group, 2022.

    Enhance

    Update BCP, DR, IR

    • Physical threats such as theft of material, vandalism, loitering, and the like are also part of business continuity threats.
    • These threats can be carried out by various means such as vehicles breaching perimeter security, bolt cutters used for cutting wire and cable, and ballistic attack.
    • Issues may occur when security operations are owned separately by physical security or information security, thus lacking consistent application of best practices.
    • To overcome this issue, organizations need to update BCP, DR, and IR holistically based on a cost-benefit analysis and the level of security maturity, which can be defined based on the suitable framework.

    Sources: IEEE, 2021; ISC, 2021

    “The best way to get management excited about a disaster plan is to burn down the building across the street.”

    Source: Dan Erwin, Security Officer, Dow Chemical Co., in Computerworld, 2022

    Optimize

    Optimizing means working to make the most effective and efficient use of resources, starting with identifying skill requirements and closing skill gaps, followed by designing and deploying integrated security architecture and controls, and finally monitoring and reporting integrated security metrics.

    Optimize

    Identify skill requirements and close skill gaps

    • The pandemic changed how people work and where they choose to work, and most people still want a hybrid work model. Our survey in July 2022 (N=516) found that 55.8% of employees have the option to work offsite 2-3 days per week, 21.0% can work offsite 1 day per week, and 17.8% can work offsite 4 days per week.
    • The investment (e.g. on infrastructure and networks) to initiate remote work was huge, and the costs didn’t end there; organizations needed to maintain the secure remote work infrastructure to facilitate the hybrid work model.
    • Moreover, roles are evolving due to convergence and modernization. These new roles require an integrative skill set. For example, the grid security and ops team might consist of an IT security specialist, a SCADA technician/engineer, and an OT/IIOT security specialist, where OT/IIOT security specialist is a new role.
    Identify skill gaps that hinder the successful execution of the hybrid work security strategy. Use the identified skill gaps to define the technical skill requirements for current and future work roles. Conduct a skills assessment on your current workforce to identify employee skill gaps. Decide whether to train (including certification), hire, contract, or outsource to close each skill gap.

    Strategic investment in internal security team

    Internal security governance and management using in-house developed tools or off-the-shelf solutions, e.g. security information and event management (SIEM).

    Security management using third parties

    Internal security management using third-party security services, e.g. managed security service providers (MSSPs).

    Outsourcing security management

    Outsourcing the entire security functions, e.g. using managed detection and response (MDR).

    Sources: Info-Tech Research Group’s Security Priorities 2023, Close the InfoSec Skills Gap, Build an IT Employee Engagement Program, and Grid Modernization

    Select the right certifications

    What are the options?

    • One issue in security certification is the complexity of relevancy in topics with respect to roles and levels.
    • The European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) takes the approach of analyzing existing certifications of ICS/SCADA professionals' cybersecurity skills by orientation, scope, and supporting bodies that are grouped into specific certifications, relevant certifications, and safety certifications (ENISA, 2015).
    • This approach can also be applied to integrated security certifications.

    Physical security certification

    • Examples: Industrial Security Professional Certification (NCMS-ISP); Physical Security Professional (ASIS-PSP); Physical Security Certification (CDSE-PSC); ISC I-100, I-200, I-300, and I-400

    Cyber physical system security certification

    • Examples: Certified SCADA Security Architect (CSSA), EC-Council ICS/SCADA Cybersecurity Training Course

    Information security certification

    • Examples: Network and Information Security (NIS) Driving License, ISA/IEC 62443 Cybersecurity Certificate Program, GIAC Global Industrial Cyber Security Professional (GICSP)

    Safety Certifications

    • Examples: Board of Certified Safety Professionals (BCSP), European Network of Safety and Health Professional Organizations (ENSHPO)
    Table showing options for Certification orientation, scope and supporting bodies.

    Optimize

    Design and deploy integrated security architecture and controls

    • A survey by Brivo found that 38% of respondents have partly centralized security platforms, 25% have decentralized platforms, and 36% have centralized platforms (Brivo, 2022; N=700).
    • If your organization’s security program is still decentralized or partly centralized and your organization is planning to establish an integrated security program, then the recommendation is to perform a holistic risk assessment based on probability and impact assessments on threats and vulnerabilities.
    • The impacted factors, for example, are customers served, criticality of services, equipment present inside the building, personnel response time for operational recovery and the mitigation of hazards, and costs.
    • Frameworks such as Sherwood Applied Business Security Architecture (SABSA), Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies (COBIT), and The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) can be used to build security architecture that aligns security goals with business goals.
    • Finally, analyze the security design against the design criteria.

    Sources: ISA and Honeywell Integrated Security Technology Lab, n.d.; IEEE, 2021

    “As long as organizations treat their physical and cyber domains as separate, there is little hope of securing either one.”

    Source: FedTech magazine, 2009

    Analyze architecture design

    Cloud, on-premises, or hybrid? During the pandemic, many enterprises were under tight deadlines to migrate to the cloud. Many did not refactor data and applications correctly for cloud platforms during migration, with the consequence of high cloud bills. This happened because the migrated applications cannot take advantage of on-premises capabilities such as autoscaling. Thus, in 2023, it is plausible that enterprises will bring applications and data back on-premises.

    Below is an example of a security design analysis of platform architecture. Design can be assessed using quantitative or qualitative approaches. In this example, a qualitative approach is applied using high-level advantages and disadvantages.

    Design criteria

    Cloud

    Hybrid

    On-premises

    Effort

    Consumer effort is within a range, e.g. < 60%

    Consumer effort is within a range e.g. < 80%

    100% organization

    Reliability

    High reliability

    High reliability

    Medium reliability that depends on data centers

    Cost

    High cost when data and applications are not correctly designed for cloud

    Optimized cost when data and applications are correctly designed either for cloud or native

    Medium cost when data and applications take advantage of on-prem capabilities

    Info-Tech Insight

    It is important for organizations to find the most optimized architecture to support them, for example, a hybrid architecture of cloud and on-premises based on operations and cost-effectiveness. To help design a security architecture that is strategic, realistic, and based on risk, see Info-Tech’s Identify the Components of Your Cloud Security Architecture research.

    Sources: InfoWorld, 2023; Identify the Components of Your Cloud Security Architecture , Info-Tech Research Group, 2021

    Analyze equipment design

    Below is an example case of a security design analysis of electronic security systems. Design can be assessed using quantitative or qualitative approaches. In this example a qualitative approach is applied using advantages and disadvantages.

    Surveillance design criteria

    Video camera

    Motion detector

    Theft of security system equipment

    Higher economic loss Lower economic loss

    Reliability

    Positive detection of intrusion Spurious indication and lower reliability

    Energy savings and bandwidth

    Only record when motion is detected Detect and process all movement

    Info-Tech Insight

    Once the design has been analyzed, the next step is to conduct market research to analyze the solutions landscape, e.g. to compare products or services from vendors or manufacturers.

    Sources: IEEE, 202; IEC, n.d.; IEC, 2013

    Analyze off-the-shelf solutions

    Criteria to consider when comparing solutions:

    Criteria to consider when comparing solutions: 1 - Visibility and asset management. 2 - Threat detection, mitigation and response. 3 - Risk assessment and vulnerability management. 4 - Usability, architecture, Cost.

    Visibility and Asset Management

    Passively monitoring data using various protocol layers, actively sending queries to devices, or parsing configuration files of physical security devices, OT, IoT, and IT environments on assets, processes, and connectivity paths.

    Threat Detection, Mitigation, and Response (+ Hunting)

    Automation of threat analysis (signature-based, specification-based, anomaly-based, flow-based, content-based, sandboxing) not only in IT but also in relevant environments, e.g. physical, IoT, IIoT, and OT on assets, data, network, and orchestration with threat intelligence sharing and analytics.

    Risk Assessment and Vulnerability Management

    Risk scoring approach (qualitative, quantitative) based on variables such as behavioral patterns and geolocation. Patching and vulnerability management.

    Usability, Architecture, Cost

    The user and administrative experience, multiple deployment options, extensive integration capabilities, and affordability.

    Source: Secure IT/OT Convergence, Info-Tech Research Group, 2022

    Optimize

    Establish, monitor, and report integrated security metrics

    Security metrics serve various functions in a security program.1 For example:

    • As audit requirements. For integrated security, the requirements are derived from mandatory or voluntary compliance, e.g. NERC CIP.
    • As an indicator of maturity level. For integrated security, maturity level is used to measure the state of security, e.g. C2M2, CMMC.
    • As a measurement of effectiveness and efficiency. Security metrics consist of operational metrics, financial metrics, etc.

    Safety

    Physical security interfaces with the physical world. Thus, metrics based on risks related to safety are crucial. These metrics motivate personnel by making clear why they should care about security.
    Source: EPRI, 2017

    Business Performance

    The impact of security on the business can be measured with various metrics such as operational metrics, service level agreements (SLAs), and financial metrics.
    Source: BMC, 2022

    Technology Performance

    Early detection leads to faster remediation and less damage. Metrics such as maximum tolerable downtime (MTD) and mean time to recovery (MTR) indicate system reliability.
    Source: Dark Reading, 2022

    Security Culture

    Measure the overall quality of security culture with indicators such as compliance and audit, vulnerability management, and training and awareness.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Security failure can be avoided by evaluating the security systems and program. Security evaluation requires understanding what, where, when, and how to measure and to report the relevant metrics.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Secure IT/OT Convergence

    The previously entirely separate OT ecosystem is migrating into the IT ecosystem, primarily to improve access via connectivity and to leverage other standard IT capabilities for economic benefit.

    Hence, IT and OT need to collaborate, starting with communication to build trust and to overcome their differences and followed by negotiation on components such as governance and management, security controls on OT environments, compliance with regulations and standards, and establishing metrics for OT security.

    Preparing for Technology Convergence in Manufacturing

    Information technology (IT) and operational technology (OT) teams have a long history of misalignment and poor communication.

    Stakeholder expectations and technology convergence create the need to leave the past behind and build a culture of collaboration.

    Build an Information Security Strategy

    Info-Tech has developed a highly effective approach to building an information security strategy – an approach that has been successfully tested and refined for over seven years with hundreds of organizations.

    This unique approach includes tools for ensuring alignment with business objectives, assessing organizational risk and stakeholder expectations, enabling a comprehensive current-state assessment, prioritizing initiatives, and building a security roadmap.

    Bibliography

    "1402-2021 - IEEE Guide for Physical Security of Electric Power Substations." IEEE, 2021. Accessed 25 Jan. 2023.

    "2022 State of Protective Intelligence Report." Ontic Center for Protective Intelligence, 2022. Accessed 16 Jan. 2023.

    "8 Staggering Statistics: Physical Security Technology Adoption." Brivo, 2022. Accessed 5 Jan. 2023.

    "America's Water Infrastructure Act of 2018." The United States' Congress, 2018. Accessed 19 Jan. 2023.

    Baker, Paul and Daniel Benny. The Complete Guide to Physical Security. Auerbach Publications. 2013

    Bennett, Steve. "Physical Security Statistics 2022 - Everything You Need to Know." WebinarCare, 4 Dec. 2022. Accessed 30 Dec. 2022.

    "Best Practices for Planning and Managing Physical Security Resources: An Interagency Security Committee Guide." Interagency Security Committee (ISC), Dec. 2015. Accessed 23 Jan. 2023.

    Black, Daniel. "Improve Security Governance With a Security Steering Committee." Info-Tech Research Group, 23 Nov. 2018. Accessed 30 Jan. 2023.

    Borg, Scott. "Don't Put Up Walls Between Your Security People." FedTech Magazine, 17 Feb. 2009. Accessed 15 Dec. 2022.

    Burwash, John. “Preparing for Technology Convergence in Manufacturing.” Info-Tech Research Group, 12 Dec. 2018. Accessed 7 Dec. 2022.

    Carney, John. "Why Integrate Physical and Logical Security?" Cisco. Accessed 19 Jan. 2023.

    "Certification of Cyber Security Skills of ICS/SCADA Professionals." European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), 2015. Accessed 27 Sep. 2022.

    Cherdantseva, Yulia and Jeremy Hilton. "Information Security and Information Assurance. The Discussion about the Meaning, Scope and Goals." Organizational, Legal, and Technological Dimensions of IS Administrator, Almeida F., Portela, I. (eds.), pp. 1204-1235. IGI Global Publishing, 2013.

    Cobb, Michael. "Physical security." TechTarget. Accessed 8 Dec. 2022.

    “Conduct a Drinking Water or Wastewater Utility Risk Assessment.” United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), n.d. Web.

    Conrad, Sandi. "Create and Implement an IoT Strategy." Info-Tech Research Group, 28 July 2022. Accessed 7 Dec. 2022.

    Cooksley, Mark. "The IEC 62443 Series of Standards: A Product Manufacturer's Perspective." YouTube, uploaded by Plainly Explained, 27 Apr. 2021. Accessed 26 Aug. 2022.

    "Cyber and physical security must validate their value in 2023." IFSEC Global, 12 Jan. 2023. Accessed 20 Jan. 2023.

    "Cybersecurity Evaluation Tool (CSET®)." Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). Accessed 23 Jan. 2023.

    "Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0." The United States' Department of Defense (DOD), 2021. Accessed 29 Dec. 2022.

    “Cyber Security Metrics for the Electric Sector: Volume 3.” Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), 2017.

    Czachor, Emily. "Mass power outage in North Carolina caused by gunfire, repairs could take days." CBS News, 5 Dec. 2022. Accessed 20 Jan. 2023.

    Dang, Robert, et al. “Secure IT/OT Convergence.” Info-Tech Research Group, 9 Dec. 2022. Web.

    "Emergency Management Act (S.C. 2007, c. 15)." The Government of Canada, 2007. Accessed 19 Jan. 2023.

    "Emergency management vocabulary." Translation Bureau, Government of Canada. Accessed 19 Jan. 2023.

    Fennelly, Lawrence. Effective physical security. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2013.

    Ghaznavi-Zadeh, Rassoul. "Enterprise Security Architecture - A Top-down Approach." The Information Systems Audit and Control Association (ISACA). Accessed 25 Jan. 2023.

    "Good Practices for Security of Internet of Things." European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), 2018. Accessed 27 Sep. 2022.

    "Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974." The United Kingdom Parliament. Accessed 23 Jan. 2023.

    Hébert, Michel, et al. “Security Priorities 2023.” Info-Tech Research Group, 1 Feb. 2023. Web.

    "History and Initial Formation of Physical Security and the Origin of Authority." Office of Research Services (ORS), National Institutes of Health (NIH). March 3, 2017. Accessed 19 Jan. 2023.

    "IEC 62676-1-1:2013 Video surveillance systems for use in security applications - Part 1-1: System requirements - General." International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), 2013. Accessed 9 Dec. 2022.

    "Incident Command System (ICS)." ICS Canada. Accessed 17 Jan. 2023.

    "Information Security Manual - Guidelines for Physical Security." The Australian Cyber Security Centre (ACSC), Dec. 2022. Accessed 13 Jan. 2023.

    "Integrated Physical Security Framework." Anixter. Accessed 8 Dec. 2022.

    "Integrating Risk and Security within a TOGAF® Enterprise Architecture." TOGAF 10, The Open Group. Accessed 11 Jan. 2023.

    Latham, Katherine. "The microchip implants that let you pay with your hand." BBC News, 11 Apr. 2022. Accessed 12 Jan. 2023.

    Linthicum, David. "2023 could be the year of public cloud repatriation." InfoWorld, 3 Jan. 2023. Accessed 10 Jan. 2023.

    Ma, Alexandra. "Thousands of people in Sweden are embedding microchips under their skin to replace ID cards." Business Insider, 14 May 2018. Accessed 12 Jan. 2023.

    Mendelssohn, Josh and Dana Tessler. "Take Control of Compliance Improvement to Conquer Every Audit." Info-Tech Research Group, 25 March 2015. Accessed 27 Jan. 2023.

    Meredith, Sam. "All you need to know about the Nord Stream gas leaks - and why Europe suspects 'gross sabotage'." CNBC, 11 Oct. 2022. Accessed 20 Jan. 2023.

    Nicaise, Vincent. "EU NIS2 Directive: what’s changing?" Stormshield, 20 Oct. 2022. Accessed 17 Nov. 2022.

    "NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems and Organizations." The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 13 Jul. 2022. Accessed 27 Jan. 2023.

    "North American Electric Reliability Corporation Critical Infrastructure Protection (NERC CIP) Series." NERC. Accessed 23 Jan. 2023.

    "North America Physical Security Market - Global Forecast to 2026." MarketsandMarkets, June 2021. Accessed 30 Dec. 2022.

    "NSTISSI No. 4011 National Training Standard For Information Systems Security (InfoSec) Professionals." The United States Committee on National Security Systems (CNSS), 20 Jun. 1994. Accessed 23 Jan. 2023.

    "Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSH) Act of 1970." The United States Department of Labor. Accessed 23 Jan. 2023.

    Palter, Jay. "10 Mistakes Made in Designing a Physical Security Program." Real Time Networks, 7 Sep. 2022. Accessed 6 Jan. 2023.

    Parker, Donn. Fighting Computer Crime. John Wiley & Sons, 1998.

    Pathak, Parag. "What Is Threat Management? Common Challenges and Best Practices." Security Intelligence, 2020. Accessed 5 Jan. 2023.

    Pender-Bey, Georgie. "The Parkerian Hexad." Lewis University, 2012. Accessed 24 Jan. 2023.

    Philippou, Oliver. "2023 Trends to Watch: Physical Security Technologies." Omdia. Accessed 20 Jan. 2023.

    Phinney, Tom. "IEC 62443: Industrial Network and System Security." ISA and Honeywell Integrated Security Technology Lab. Accessed 30 Jan. 2023.

    "Physical Security Market, with COVID-19 Impact Analysis - Global Forecast to 2026." MarketsandMarkets, Jan. 2022. Accessed 30 Dec. 2022.

    "Physical Security Professional (PSP)" ASIS International. Accessed 17 Jan. 2023.

    "Physical Security Systems (PSS) Assessment Guide" The United States' Department of Energy (DOE), Dec. 2016. Accessed 23 Jan. 2023.

    "Policies, Standards, Best Practices, Guidance, and White Papers." Interagency Security Committee (ISC). Accessed 23 Jan. 2023.

    "Profiles, Add-ons and Specifications." ONVIF. Accessed 9 Dec. 2022.

    "Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF)." The Australian Attorney-General's Department (AGD). Accessed 13 Jan. 2023.

    "Satellites detect methane plume in Nord Stream leak." The European Space Agency (ESA), 6 oct. 2022. Accessed 23 Jan. 2023.

    ""Satellites detect methane plume in Nord Stream leak." The European Space Agency (ESA), 6 oct. 2022. Accessed 23 Jan. 2023.

    Satgunananthan, Niru. "Challenges in Security Convergence?" LinkedIn, 8 Jan. 2022. Accessed 20 Dec. 2022.

    Sooknanan, Shastri and Isaac Kinsella. "Identify the Components of Your Cloud Security Architecture." Info-Tech Research Group, 12 March 2021. Accessed 26 Jan. 2023.

    "TC 79 Alarm and electronic security systems." International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), n.d. Accessed 9 Dec. 2022.

    "The Risk Management Process for Federal Facilities: An Interagency Security Committee Standard." Interagency Security Committee (ISC), 2021. Accessed 26 Jan. 2023.

    "The Short Guide to Why Security Programs Can Fail." CyberTalk, 23 Sep. 2021. Accessed 30 Dec. 2022.

    Verton, Dan. "Companies Aim to Build Security Awareness." Computerworld, 27 Nov. 2022. Accessed 26 Jan. 2023.

    "Vulnerability Assessment of Federal Facilities." The United States' Department of Justice, 28 Jun. 1995. Accessed 19 Jan. 2023.

    "What is IEC 61508?" 61508 Association. Accessed 23 Jan. 2023.

    Wolf, Gene. "Better Include Physical Security With Cybersecurity." T&D World 5 Jan. 2023. Accessed 19 Jan. 2023.

    Wood, Kate, and Isaac Kinsella. “Build an Information Security Strategy.” Info-Tech Research Group, 9 Sept. 2020. Web.

    Woolf, Tim, et al. "Benefit-Cost Analysis for Utility-Facing Grid Modernization Investments: Trends, Challenges, and Considerations." Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Feb. 2021. Accessed 15 Nov. 2022.

    "Work Health and Safety Act 2011." The Australian Government. Accessed 13 Jan. 2023.

    Wu, Jing. “Industrial Control System Modernization: Unlock the Value of Automation in Utilities.” Info-Tech Research Group, 6 April 2023. Web.

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Amy L. Meger, IGP

    Information and Cyber Governance Manager
    Platte River Power Authority

    Andrew Amaro

    Chief Security Officer (CSO) & Founder
    KLAVAN Security

    Bilson Perez

    IT Security Manager
    4Wall Entertainment

    Dan Adams

    VP of Information Technology
    4Wall Entertainment

    Doery Abdou

    Senior Manager
    March Networks Corporate

    Erich Krueger

    Manager of Security Engineering
    Omaha Public Power District

    Kris Krishan

    Head of IT
    Waymo

    Owen Yardley

    Director, Facilities Security Preparedness
    Omaha Public Power District

    Unify a Mixed Methodology Portfolio

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}441|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Portfolio Management
    • Parent Category Link: /portfolio-management
    • As portfolio manager, you oversee a portfolio made up of projects using different types of planning and execution methodologies – from traditional Waterfall, to Agile, to hybrid approaches and beyond. The discontinuity between reporting metrics and funding models makes a holistic and perpetually actionable view of the portfolio elusive.
    • Agile’s influence is growing within the organization’s project ecosystem. Even projects that don’t formally use Agile methods often adopt agile tendencies, such as mitigating risk with shorter, more iterative development cycles and increasing collaboration with stakeholders. While this has introduced efficiencies at the project level, it has not translated into business agility, with decision makers still largely playing a passive role in terms of steering the portfolio.
    • Senior management still expects traditional commitments and deadlines, not “sprints” and “velocity.” The reluctance of many Agile purists to adhere to traditional timeline, budget, and scope commitments is not making Agile a particularly popular conversation topic among the organization’s decision-making layer.
    • As portfolio manager, it’s your job to unify these two increasingly fragmented worlds into a unified portfolio.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • As Agile’s influence grows and project methodologies morph and proliferate, a more engaged executive layer is required than what we see in a traditional portfolio approach. Portfolio owners have to decide what gets worked on at a regular cadence.
    • What’s the difference? In the old paradigm, nobody stopped the portfolio owners from approving too much. Decisions were based on what should be done, rather than what could get done in a given period, with the resources available.
    • The engaged portfolio succeeds by making sure that the right people work on the right things as much as possible. The portfolio owner plays a key, ongoing role in identifying the work that needs to be done, and the portfolio managers optimize the usage of resources.

    Impact and Result

    • Establish universal control points. While the manager of a mixed methodology portfolio doesn’t need to enforce a standardized project methodology, she or he does need to establish universal control points for both intake and reporting at the portfolio level. Use this research to help you define a sustainable process that will work for all types of projects.
    • Scale the approvals process. For a mixed methodology portfolio to work, the organization needs to reconcile different models for approving and starting projects. This blueprint will help you define a right-sized intake process and decision-making paradigm for sprints and project phases alike.
    • Foster ongoing executive engagement. Mixed methodology success is contingent on regular and ongoing executive engagement. Use the tools and templates associated with this blueprint to help get buy-in and commitment upfront, and then to build out portfolio reports and dashboard that will help keep the executive layer informed and engaged long term.

    Unify a Mixed Methodology Portfolio Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should consider an Engaged Agile Portfolio approach, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Get portfolio commitments

    Assess the current state of the portfolio and ensure that portfolio owners and other stakeholders are onboard before you move forward to develop and implement new portfolio processes.

    • Unify a Mixed Methodology Portfolio – Phase 1
    • Mixed Methodology Portfolio Analyzer
    • Mixed Methodology Portfolio Strategy Template
    • Mixed Methodology Portfolio Stakeholder Survey Tool

    2. Define your portfolio processes

    Wireframe standardized portfolio processes for all project methodologies to follow.

    • Unify a Mixed Methodology Portfolio – Phase 2
    • Agile Portfolio Sprint Prioritization Tool
    • Project Methodology Assessment Tool

    3. Implement your processes

    Pilot your new portfolio processes and decision-making paradigm. Then, execute a change impact analysis to inform your communications strategy and implementation plan.

    • Unify a Mixed Methodology Portfolio – Phase 3
    • Process Pilot Plan Template
    • Intake and Prioritization Impact Analysis Tool
    • Resource Management Impact Analysis Tool
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Unify a Mixed Methodology Portfolio

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Assess Current State of the Portfolio

    The Purpose

    Determine the current state of your project execution and portfolio oversight practices.

    Align different types of projects within a unified portfolio.

    Define the best roles and engagement strategies for individual stakeholders as you transition to an Engaged Agile Portfolio.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A current state understanding of project and portfolio management challenges.

    Bolster the business case for developing an Engaged Agile Portfolio.

    Increase stakeholder and team buy-in.

    Activities

    1.1 Calculate the size of your portfolio in human resource hours.

    1.2 Estimate your project sizes and current project methodology mix.

    1.3 Document the current known status of your in-flight projects.

    1.4 Perform a project execution portfolio oversight survey.

    Outputs

    Your portfolio’s project capacity in resource hours.

    Better understanding of project demand and portfolio mix.

    Current state visibility.

    An objective assessment of current areas of strengths and weaknesses.

    2 Define Your Portfolio Processes

    The Purpose

    Objectively and transparently approve, reject, and prioritize projects.

    Prioritize work to start and stop on a sprint-by-sprint basis.

    Maintain a high frequency of accurate reporting.

    Assess and report the realization of project benefits.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Improve timeliness and accuracy of project portfolio reporting.

    Make better, faster decisions about when to start and stop work on different projects.

    Increase stakeholder satisfaction.

    Activities

    2.1 Develop a portfolio intake workflow.

    2.2 Develop a prioritization scorecard and process.

    2.3 Establish a process to estimate sprint demand and resource supply.

    2.4 Develop a process to estimate sprint value and necessity.

    Outputs

    An intake workflow.

    A prioritization scorecard and process.

    A process to estimate sprint demand and resource supply.

    A process to estimate sprint value and necessity.

    3 Implement Your Processes

    The Purpose

    Analyze the potential change impacts of your new portfolio processes and how they will be felt across the organization.

    Develop an implementation plan to ensure strategy buy-in.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A strategic and well-planned approach to process implementation.

    Activities

    3.1 Analyze change impacts of new portfolio processes.

    3.2 Prepare a communications plan based upon change impacts.

    3.3 Develop an implementation plan.

    3.4 Present new portfolio processes to portfolio owners.

    Outputs

    A change impact analysis.

    A communications plan.

    An implementation plan.

    Portfolio strategy buy-in.

    Manage Your Chromebooks and MacBooks

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}167|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: End-User Computing Devices
    • Parent Category Link: /end-user-computing-devices

    Windows is no longer the only option. MacBooks and Chromebooks are justified, but now you have to manage them.

    • If you have modernized your end-user computing strategy, you may have Windows 10 devices as well as MacBooks.
    • Virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) and desktop as a service (DaaS) are becoming popular. Chromebooks may be ideal as a low-cost interface into DaaS for your employees.
    • Managing Chromebooks can be particularly challenging as they grow in popularity in the education sector.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Managing end-user devices may be accomplished with a variety of solutions, but many of those solutions advocate integration with a Microsoft-friendly solution to take advantage of features such as conditional access, security functionality, and data governance.

    Impact and Result

    • Many solutions are available to manage end-user devices, and they come with a long list of options and features. Clarify your needs and define your requirements before you purchase another endpoint management tool. Don’t purchase capabilities that you may never use.
    • Use the associated Endpoint Management Selection Tool spreadsheet to identify your desired endpoint solution features and compare vendor solution functionality based on your desired features.

    Manage Your Chromebooks and MacBooks Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Manage Your Chromebooks and MacBooks deck – MacBooks and Chromebooks are growing in popularity in enterprise and education environments, and now you have to manage them.

    Explore options, guidance and some best practices related to the management of Chromebooks and MacBooks in the enterprise environment and educational institutions. Our guidance will help you understand features and options available in a variety of solutions. We also provide guidance on selecting the best endpoint management solution for your own environment.

    • Manage Your Chromebooks and MacBooks Storyboard

    2. Endpoint Management Selection Tool – Select the best endpoint management tool for your environment. Build a table to compare endpoint management offerings in relation to the features and options desired by your organization.

    This tool will help you determine the features and options you want or need in an endpoint management solution.

    • Endpoint Management Selection Tool
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Manage Your Chromebooks and MacBooks

    Financial constraints, strategy, and your user base dictate the need for Chromebooks and MacBooks – now you have to manage them in your environment.

    Analyst Perspective

    Managing MacBooks and Chromebooks is similar to managing Windows devices in many ways and different in others. The tools have many common features, yet they struggle to achieve the same goals.

    Until recently, Windows devices dominated the workplace globally. Computing devices were also rare in many industries such as education. Administrators and administrative staff may have used Windows-based devices, but Chromebooks were not yet in use. Most universities and colleges were Windows-based in offices with some flavor of Unix in other areas, and Apple devices were gaining some popularity in certain circles.

    That is a stark contrast compared to today, where Chromebooks dominate the classrooms and MacBooks and Chromebooks are making significant inroads into the enterprise environment. MacBooks are also a common sight on many university campuses. There is no doubt that while Windows may still be the dominant player, it is far from the only one in town.

    Now that Chromebooks and MacBooks are a notable, if not significant, part of the education and enterprise environments, they must be afforded the same considerations as Windows devices in those environments when it comes to management. The good news is that there is no lack of available solutions for managing these devices, and the endpoint management landscape is continually evolving and improving.

    This is a picture of P.J. Ryan, Research Director, Infrastructure & Operations, Info-Tech Research Group

    P.J. Ryan
    Research Director, Infrastructure & Operations
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    • You modernized your end-user computing strategy and now have Windows 10 devices as well as MacBooks.
    • Virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) and desktop as a service (DaaS) are becoming popular. Chromebooks would be ideal as a low-cost interface into DaaS for your employees.
    • You are responsible for the management of all the new Chromebooks in your educational district.
    • Windows is no longer the only option. MacBooks and Chromebooks are justified, but now you have to manage them.

    Common Obstacles

    • Endpoint management solutions typically do a great job at managing one category of devices, like Windows or MacBooks, but they struggle to fully manage alternative endpoints.
    • Multiple solutions to manage multiple devices will result in multiple dashboards. A single view would be better.
    • One solution may not fit all, but multiple solutions is not desirable either, especially if you have Windows devices, MacBooks, and Chromebooks.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    • Use the tools at your disposal first – don't needlessly spend money if you don't have to. Many solutions can already manage other types of devices to some degree.
    • Use the integration capabilities of endpoint management tools. Many of them can integrate with each other to give you a single interface to manage multiple types of devices while taking advantage of additional functionality.
    • Don't purchase capabilities you will never use. Using 80% of a less expensive tool is economically smarter than using 10% of a more expensive tool.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Managing end-user devices may be accomplished with a variety of solutions, but many of those solutions advocate integration with a Microsoft-friendly solution to take advantage of features such as conditional access, security functionality, and data governance.

    Insight Summary

    Insight 1

    Google Admin Console is necessary to manage Chromebooks, but it can be paired with other tools. Implementation partnerships provide solutions to track the device lifecycle, track the repair lifecycle, sync with Google Admin Console as well as PowerSchool to provide a more complete picture of the user and device, and facilitate reminders to return the device, pay fees if necessary, pick up a device when a repair is complete, and more.

    Insight 2

    The Google Admin Console allows admins to follow an organizational unit (OU) structure very similar to what they may have used in Microsoft's Active Directory environment. This familiarity makes the task of administering Chromebooks easier for admins.

    Insight 3

    Chromebook management goes beyond securing and manipulating the device. Controls to protect the students while online, such as Safe Search and Safe Browsing, should also be implemented.

    Insight 4

    Most companies choose to use a dedicated MacBook management tool. Many unified endpoint management (UEM) tools can manage MacBooks to some extent, but admins tend to agree that a MacBook-focused endpoint management tool is best for MacBooks while a Windows-based endpoint management tool is best for Windows devices.

    Insight 5

    Some MacBook management solutions advocate integration with Windows UEM solutions to take advantage of Microsoft features such as conditional access, security functionality, and data governance. This approach can also be applied to Chromebooks.

    Chromebooks

    Chromebooks had a respectable share of the education market before 2020, but the COVID-19 pandemic turbocharged the penetration of Chromebooks in the education industry.

    Chromebooks are also catching the attention of some decision makers in the enterprise environment.

    "In 2018, Chromebooks represented an incredible 60 percent of all laptop or tablet devices in K-12 -- up from zero percent when the first Chromebook launched during the summer break in 2011."
    – "Will Chromebooks Rule the Enterprise?" Computerworld

    "Chromebooks were the best performing PC products in Q3 2020, with shipment volume increasing to a record-high 9.4 million units, up a whopping 122% year-on-year."
    – Android Police

    "Until the pandemic, Chrome OS' success was largely limited to U.S. schools. Demand in 2020 appears to have expanded beyond that small but critical part of the U.S. PC market."
    – Geekwire

    "In addition to running a huge number of Chrome Extensions and Apps at once, Chromebooks also run Android, Linux and Windows apps."
    – "Will Chromebooks Rule the Enterprise?" Computerworld

    Managing Chromebooks

    Start with the Google Admin Console (GAC)

    GAC is necessary to initially manage Chrome OS devices.

    GAC gives you a centralized console that will allow you to:

    • Create organizational units
    • Add your Chromebook devices
    • Add users
    • Assign users to devices
    • Create groups
    • Create and assign policies
    • Plus more

    GAC can facilitate device management with features such as:

    • Control admin permissions
    • Encryption and update settings
    • App deployment, screen timeout settings
    • Perform a device wipe if required
    • Audit user activity on a device
    • Plus more

    Device and user addition, group and organizational unit creation and administration, applying policies to devices and users – does all this remind you of your Active Directory environment?

    GAC lets you administer users and devices with a similar approach.

    Managing Chromebooks

    Use Active Directory to manage Chromebooks.

    • Enable Active Directory (AD) management from within GAC and you will be able to integrate your Chromebook devices with your AD environment.
    • Devices will be visible in both the GAC and AD environment.
    • Use Windows Group Policy to manage devices and to push policies to users and devices.
    • Users can use their AD username and password to sign into Chromebook devices.
    • GAC can still be used for devices that are not synced with AD.

    Chromebooks can also be managed through these approved partners:

    • Cisco Meraki
    • Citrix XenMobile
    • IBM MaaS360
    • ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus
    • VMware Workspace ONE

    Source: Google

    You must be running the Chrome Enterprise Upgrade and have any licenses required by the approved partner to take advantage of this management option. The partner admin policies supersede GAC.

    If you stop using the approved partner admin console to manage your devices, the polices and settings in GAC will immediately take over the devices.

    Microsoft still has the market share when it comes to device sales, and many administrators are already familiar with Microsoft's Active Directory. Google took advantage of that familiarity when it designed the Google Admin Console structure for users, groups, and organizational units.

    Chromebook Deployment

    Chromebook deployment becomes a challenge when device quantities grow. The enrollment process can be time consuming, and every device must be enrolled before it can be used by an employee or a student. Many admins enlist their full IT teams to assist in the short term. Some vendor partners may assist with distribution options if staffing levels permit. Recent developments from Google have opened additional options for device enrollment beyond the manual enrollment approach.

    Enrolling Chromebooks comes down to one of two approaches:

    1. Manually enrolling one device at a time
      • Users can assist by entering some identifying details during the enrollment if permitted.
      • Some third-party solutions exist, such as USB drives to reduce repetitive keystrokes or hubs to facilitate manually enrolling multiple Chromebooks simultaneously.
    2. Google's Chrome Enterprise Upgrade or the Chrome Education Upgrade
      • This allows you to let your users enroll devices after they accept the end-user license agreement.
      • You can take advantage of Google's vendor partner program and use a zero-touch deployment method where the Chromebook devices automatically receive the assigned policies, apps, and settings as soon as the device is powered on and an authorized user signs in.
      • The Enterprise Upgrade and the Education Upgrade do come with an annual cost per device, which is currently less than US$50.
      • The Enterprise and Education Upgrades come with other features as well, such as enhanced security.

    Chromebooks are automatically assigned to the top-level organizational unit (OU) when enrolled. Devices can be manually moved to another OU, but admins can also create enrollment policies to place newly enrolled devices in a specific OU or have the device locate itself in the same OU as the user.

    Chromebooks in Education

    GAC is also used with Education-licensed devices

    Most of the settings and features previously mentioned are also available for Education-licensed devices and users. Enterprise-specific features will not be available to Education licenses. (Active Directory integration with Education licenses, for example, is accomplished using a different approach)

    • Groups, policies, administrative controls, app deployment and management, adding devices and users, creating organizational units, and more features are all available to Education Admins to use.

    Education device policies and settings tend to focus more on protecting the students with controls such as:

    • Disable incognito mode
    • Disable location tracking
    • Disable external storage devices
    • Browser based protections such as Safe Search or Safe Browsing
    • URL blocking
    • Video input disable for websites
    • App installation prevention, auto re-install, and app blocking
    • Forced re-enrollment to your domain after a device is wiped
    • Disable Guest Mode
    • Restrict who can sign in
    • Audit user activity on a device

    When a student takes home a Chromebook assigned to them, that Chromebook may be the only computer in the household. Administrative polices and settings must take into account the fact that the device may have multiple users accessing many different sites and applications when the device is outside of the school environment.

    Chromebook Management Extended

    An online search for Chromebook management solutions will reveal several software solutions that augment the capabilities of the Google Admin Console. Many of these solutions are focused on the education sector and classroom and student options, although the features would be beneficial to enterprises and educational organizations alike.

    These solutions assist or augment Chromebook management with features such as:

    • Ability to sync with Google Admin Console
    • Ability to sync with student information systems, such as PowerSchool
    • Financial management, purchase details, and chargeback
    • Asset lifecycle management
    • 1:1 Chromebook distribution management
    • Repair programs and repair process management
    • Check-out/loan program management
    • Device distribution/allocation management, including barcode reader integration
    • Simple learning material distribution to the classroom for teachers
    • Facilitate GAC bulk operations
    • Manage inventory of non-IT assets such as projectors, TVs, and other educational assets
    • Plus more

    "There are many components to managing Chromebooks. Schools need to know which student has which device, which school has which device, and costs relating to repairs. Chromebook Management Software … facilitates these processes."
    – VIZOR

    MacBooks

    • MacBooks are gaining popularity in the Enterprise world.
    • Some admins claim MacBooks are less expensive in the long run over Windows-based PCs.
    • Users claim less issues when using a MacBook, and overall, companies report increased retention rates when users are using MacBooks.

    "Macs now make up 23% of endpoints in enterprises."
    – ComputerWeekly.com

    "When given the choice, no less than 72% of employees choose Macs over PCs."
    – "5 Reasons Mac is a must," Jamf

    "IBM says it is 3X more expensive to manage PCs than Macs."
    – Computerworld

    "74% of those who previously used a PC for work experienced fewer issues now that they use a Mac"
    – "Global Survey: Mac in the Enterprise," Jamf

    "When enterprise moves to Mac, staff retention rates improve by 20%. That's quite a boost! "
    – "5 Reasons Mac is a must," Jamf

    Managing MacBooks

    Can your existing UEM keep up?

    Many Windows unified endpoint management (UEM) tools can manage MacBooks, but most companies choose to use a dedicated MacBook management tool.

    • UEM tools that are primarily Windows focused do not typically go deep enough into the management capabilities of non-Windows devices.
    • Admins have noted limitations when it comes to using Windows UEM tools, and reasons they prefer a dedicated MacBook management solution include:
      • Easier to use
      • Faster response times when deploying settings and policies
      • Better control over notification settings and lock screen settings.
      • Easier Apple Business Manager (ABM) integration and provisioning.
    • Note that not every UEM will have the same limitations or advantages. Functionality is different between vendor products.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Most Windows UEM tools are constantly improving, and it is only a matter of time before they rival many of the dedicated MacBook management tools out there.

    Admins tend to agree that a Windows UEM is best for Windows while an Apple-based UEM is best for Apple devices.

    Managing MacBooks

    The market for "MacBook-first" management solutions includes a variety of players of varying ages such as:

    • Jamf
    • Kandji
    • Mosyle
    • SimpleMDM
    • Others

    MacBook-focused management tools can provide features such as:

    • Encryption and update settings
    • App deployment and lifecycle management
    • Remote device wipe, scan, shutdown, restart, and lock
    • Zero touch deployment and support
    • Location tracking
    • Browser content filtering
    • Enable, hide/block, or disable built-in features
    • Configure Wi-Fi, VPN, and certificate-based settings
    • Centralized dashboard with device and app listings as well as individual details
    • Data restrictions
    • Plus more

    Unified endpoint management (UEM) solutions that can provide MacBook management to some degree include (but are not limited to):

    • Intune
    • Ivanti
    • Endpoint Central
    • WorkspaceOne

    Dedicated solutions advocate integration with UEM solutions to take advantage of conditional access, security functionality, and data governance features.

    Jamf and Microsoft entered into a collaboration several years ago with the intention of making the MacBook management process easier and more secure.

    Microsoft Intune and Jamf Pro: Better together to manage and secure Macs
    Microsoft Conditional Access with Jamf Pro ensures that company data is only accessed by trusted users, on trusted devices, using trusted apps. Jamf extends this Enterprise Mobile + Security (EMS) functionality to Mac, iPhone and iPad.
    – "Microsoft Intune and Jamf Pro," Jamf

    Endpoint Management Selection Tool
    Activity

    There are many solutions available to manage end-user devices, and they come with a long list of options and features. Clarify your needs and define your requirements before you purchase another endpoint management tool. Don't purchase capabilities that you may never use.

    Use the Endpoint Management Selection Tool to identify your desired endpoint solution features and compare vendor solution functionality based on your desired features.

    1. List out the desired features you want in an endpoint solution for your devices and record those features in the first column. Use the features provided, or add your own and edit or delete the existing ones if necessary.
    2. List your selected endpoint management solution vendors in each of the columns in place of "Vendor 1," "Vendor 2," etc.
    3. Fill out the spreadsheet by changing the corresponding desired feature cell under each vendor to a "yes" or "no" based on your findings while investigating each vendor solution.
    4. When you have finished your investigation, review your spreadsheet to compare the various offerings and pros and cons of each vendor.
    5. Select your endpoint management solution.

    Endpoint Management Selection Tool

    In the first column, list out the desired features you want in an endpoint solution for your devices. Use the features provided if desired, or add your own and edit or delete the existing ones if necessary. As you look into various endpoint management solution vendors, list them in the columns in place of "Vendor 1," "Vendor 2," etc. Use the "Desired Feature" list as a checklist and change the values to "yes" or "no" in the corresponding box under the vendors' names. When complete, you will be able to look at all the features and compare vendors in a single table.

    Desired Feature Vendor 1 Vendor 2 Vendor 3
    Organizational unit creation Yes No Yes
    Group creation Yes Yes Yes
    Ability to assign users to devices No Yes Yes
    Control of administrative permissions Yes Yes Yes
    Conditional access No Yes Yes
    Security policies enforced Yes No Yes
    Asset management No Yes No
    Single sign-on Yes Yes Yes
    Auto-deployment No Yes No
    Repair lifecycle tracking No Yes No
    Application deployment Yes Yes No
    Device tracking Yes Yes Yes
    Ability to enable encryption Yes No Yes
    Device wipe Yes No Yes
    Ability to enable/disable device tracking No No Yes
    User activity audit No No No

    Related Info-Tech Research

    this is a screenshot from Info-Tech's Modernize and Transform Your End-User Computing Strategy.

    Modernize and Transform Your End-User Computing Strategy
    This project helps support the workforce of the future by answering the following questions: What types of computing devices, provisioning models, and operating systems should be offered to end users? How will IT support devices? What are the policies and governance surrounding how devices are used? What actions are we taking and when? How do end-user devices support larger corporate priorities and strategies?

    Best Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) Software 2022 | SoftwareReviews
    Compare and evaluate unified endpoint management vendors using the most in-depth and unbiased buyer reports available. Download free comprehensive 40+ page reports to select the best unified endpoint management software for your organization.

    Best Enterprise Mobile Management (EMM) Software 2022 | (softwarereviews.com)
    Compare and evaluate enterprise mobile management vendors using the most in-depth and unbiased buyer reports available. Download free comprehensive 40+ page reports to select the best enterprise mobile management software for your organization.

    Bibliography

    Bridge, Tom. "Macs in the enterprise – what you need to know". Computerweekly.com, TechTarget. 27 May 2022. Accessed 12 Aug. 2022.
    Copley-Woods, Haddayr. "5 reasons Mac is a must in the enterprise". Jamf.com, Jamf. 28 June 2022. Accessed 16 Aug. 2022.
    Duke, Kent. "Chromebook sales skyrocketed in Q3 2020 with online education fueling demand." androidpolice.com, Android Police. 16 Nov 2020. Accessed 10 Aug. 2022.
    Elgin, Mike. "Will Chromebooks Rule the Enterprise? (5 Reasons They May)". Computerworld.com, Computerworld. 30 Aug 2019. Accessed 10 Aug. 2022.
    Evans, Jonny. "IBM says it is 3X more expensive to manage PCs than Macs". Computerworld.com, Computerworld. 19 Oct 2016. Accessed 23 Aug. 2022.
    "Global Survey: Mac in the Enterprise". Jamf.com, Jamf. Accessed 16 Aug. 2022.
    "How to Manage Chromebooks Like a Pro." Vizor.cloud, VIZOR. Accessed 10 Aug. 2022.
    "Manage Chrome OS Devices with EMM Console". support.google.com, Google. Accessed 16 Aug. 2022.
    Protalinski, Emil. "Chromebooks outsold Macs worldwide in 2020, cutting into Windows market share". Geekwire.com, Geekwire. 16 Feb 2021. Accessed 22 Aug. 2022.
    Smith, Sean. "Microsoft Intune and Jamf Pro: Better together to manage and secure Macs". Jamf.com, Jamf. 20 April 2022. Accessed 16 Aug. 2022.

    Define Service Desk Metrics That Matter

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}491|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Service Desk
    • Parent Category Link: /service-desk
    • Consolidate your metrics and assign context and actions to ones currently tracked.
    • Establish tension metrics to see and tell the whole story.
    • Split your metrics for each stakeholder group. Assign proper cadences for measurements as a first step to building an effective dashboard.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Identify the metrics that serve a real purpose and eliminate the rest. Establish a formal review process to ensure metrics are still valid, continue to provide the answers needed, and are at a manageable and usable level.

    Impact and Result

    • Tracking goal- and action-based metrics allows you to make meaningful, data-driven decisions for your service desk. You can establish internal benchmarks to set your own baselines.
    • Predefining the audience and cadence of each metric allows you to construct targeted dashboards to aid your metrics analysis.

    Define Service Desk Metrics That Matter Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Define Service Desk Metrics That Matter Storyboard – A deck that shows you how to look beyond benchmarks and rely on internal metrics to drive success.

    Deciding which service desk metrics to track and how to analyze them can be daunting. Use this deck to narrow down your goal-oriented metrics as a starting point and set your own benchmarks.

    • Define Service Desk Metrics That Matter Storyboard

    2. Service Desk Metrics Workbook – A tool to organize your service desk metrics.

    For each metric, consider adding the relevant overall goal, audience, cadence, and action. Use the audience and cadence of the metric to split your tracked metrics into various dashboards. Your final list of metrics and reports can be added to your service desk SOP.

    • Service Desk Metrics Workbook
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Define Service Desk Metrics That Matter

    Look beyond benchmarks and rely on internal metrics to drive success.

    Analyst Perspective

    Don’t get paralyzed by benchmarks when establishing metrics

    When establishing a suite of metrics to track, it’s tempting to start with the metrics measured by other organizations. Naturally, benchmarking will enter the conversation. While benchmarking is useful, measuring you organization against others with a lack of context will only highlight your failures. Furthermore, benchmarks will highlight the norm or common practice. It does not necessarily highlight best practice.

    Keeping the limitations of benchmarking in mind, establish your own metrics suite with action-based metrics. Define the audience, cadence, and actions for each metric you track and pair them with business goals. Measure only what you need to.

    Slowly improve your metrics process over time and analyze your environment using your own data as your benchmark.

    Benedict Chang

    Research Analyst, Infrastructure & Operations

    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    • Measure the business value provided by the service desk.
    • Consolidate your metrics and assign context and actions to ones currently tracked.
    • Establish tension metrics to see and tell the whole story.
    • Split your metrics for each stakeholder group. Assign proper cadences for measurements as a first step to building an effective dashboard or effective dashboards.

    Common Obstacles

    • Becoming too focused on benchmarks or unidimensional metrics (e.g. cost, first-contact resolution, time to resolve) can lead to misinterpretation of the data and poorly informed actions.
    • Sifting through the many sources of data post hoc can lead to stalling in data analysis or slow reaction times to poor metrics.
    • Dashboards can quickly become cluttered with uninformative metrics, thus reducing the signal-to-noise ratio of meaningful data.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    • Use metrics that drive productive change and improvement. Track only what you need to report on.
    • Ensure each metric aligns with the desired business goal, is action-based, and includes the answers to what, why, how, and who.
    • Establish internal benchmarks by analyzing the trends from your own data to set baselines.
    • Act on the results of your metrics by adjusting targets and measuring success.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Identify the metrics that serve a real purpose and eliminate the rest. Establish a formal review process to ensure metrics are still valid, continue to provide the answers needed, and are at a manageable and usable level.

    Improve your metrics to align IT with strategic business goals

    The right metrics can tell the business how hard IT works and how well they perform.

    • Only 19% of CXOs feel that their organization is effective at measuring the success of IT projects with their current metrics.
    • Implementing the proper metrics can facilitate communication between the business division and IT practice.
    • The proper metrics can help IT know what issues the business has and how the CEO and CIO should tackle them.
    • If the goals above resonate with your organization, our blueprint Take Control of Infrastructure and Operations Metrics will take you through the right steps.

    Current Metrics Suite

    19% Effective

    36% Some Improvement Necessary

    45% Significant Improvement Necessary

    Source: Info-Tech Research Group’s CEO/CIO Alignment Diagnostic, 2019; N=622

    CXOs stress that value is the most critical area for IT to improve in reporting

    • You most likely have to improve your metrics suite by addressing business value.
    • Over 80% of organizations say they need improvement to their business value metrics, with 32% of organizations reporting that significant improvement is needed.
    • Of course, measuring metrics for service desk operations is important, but don’t forget business-oriented metrics such as measuring knowledgebase articles written for shift-left enablement, cost (time and money) of service desk tickets, and overall end-user satisfaction.

    The image shows a bar graph with percentages on the Y-Acis, and the following categories on the X-Axis: Business value metrics; Stakeholder satisfaction reporting; Risk metrics; Technology performance & operating metrics; Cost & Salary metrics; and Ad hoc feedback from executives and staff. Each bar is split into two sections, with the blue section marked a Significant Improvement Necessary, and the purple section labelled Some Improvement necessary. Two sections are highlighted with red circles: Business Value metrics--32% blue; 52% purple; and Technology performance & operating metrics--23% blue and 51% purple.

    Source: Info-Tech Research Group’s CEO/CIO Alignment Diagnostic, 2019; N=622

    Benchmarking used in isolation will not tell the whole story

    Benchmarks can be used as a step in the metrics process

    They can be the first step to reach an end goal, but if benchmarks are observed in isolation, it will only highlight your failures.

    Benchmarking relies on standardized models

    This does not account for all the unique variables that make up an IT organization.

    For example, benchmarks that include cost and revenue may include organizations that prioritize first-call resolution (FCR), but the variables that make up this benchmark model will be quite different within your own organization.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Benchmarks reflect the norm and common practice, not best practice.

    Benchmarks are open to interpretation

    Taking the time to establish proper metrics is often more valuable time spent than going down the benchmark rabbit hole.

    Being above or below the norm is neither a good nor a bad thing.

    Determining what the results mean for you depends on what’s being measured and the unique factors, characteristics, and priorities in your organization.

    If benchmark data is a priority within your IT organization, you may look up organizations like MetricNet, but keep the following in mind:

    Review the collected benchmark data

    See where IT organizations in your industry typically stand in relation to the overall benchmark.

    Assess the gaps

    Large gaps between yourself and the overall benchmark could indicate areas for improvement or celebration. Use the data to focus your analysis, develop deeper self-awareness, and prioritize areas for potential concern.

    Benchmarks are only guidelines

    The benchmark source data may not come from true peers in every sense. Each organization is different, so always explore your unique context when interpreting any findings.

    Rely on internal metrics to measure and improve performance

    Measure internal metrics over time to define goals and drive real improvement

    • Internally measured metrics are more reliable because they provide information about your actual performance over time. This allows for targeted improvements and objective measurements of your milestones.
    • Whether a given metric is the right one for your service desk will depend on several different factors, including:
      • The maturity and capability of your service desk processes
      • The volume of service requests and incidents
      • The complexity of your environment when resolving tickets
      • The degree to which your end users are comfortable with self-service

    Take Info-Tech’s approach to metrics management

    Use metrics that drive productive change and improvement. Track only what you need to report on.

    Ensure each metric aligns with the desired business goal, is action-based, and includes the answers to what, why, how, and who.

    Establish internal benchmarks by analyzing the trends from your own data to set baselines.

    Act on the results of your metrics by adjusting targets and measuring success.

    Define action-based metrics to cut down on analysis paralysis

    Every metric needs to be backed with the following criteria:

    • Defining audience, cadence, goal, and action for each metric allows you to keep your tracked metrics to a minimum while maximizing the value.
    • The audience and cadence of each metric may allow you to define targeted dashboards.

    Audience - Who is this metric tracked for?

    Goal - Why are you tracking this metric? This can be defined along with the CSFs and KPIs.

    Cadence - How often are you going to view, analyze, and action this metric?

    Action - What will you do if this metric spikes, dips, trends up, or trends down?

    Activity 1. Define your critical success factors and key performance indicators

    Critical success factors (CSFs) are high-level goals that help you define the direction of your service desk. Key performance indicators (KPIs) can be treated as the trend of metrics that will indicate that you are moving in the direction of your CSFs. These will help narrow the data you have to track and action (metrics).

    CSFs, or your overall goals, typically revolve around three aspects of the service desk: time spent on tickets, resources spent on tickets, and the quality of service provided.

    1. As a group, brainstorm the CSFs and the KPIs that will help narrow your metrics. Use the Service Desk Metrics Workbook to record the results.
    2. Look at the example to the right as a starting point.

    Example metrics:

    Critical success factor Key performance indicator
    High End-User Satisfaction Increasing CSAT score on transactional surveys
    High end-user satisfaction score
    Proper resolution of tickets
    Low time to resolve
    Low Cost per Ticket Decreasing cost per ticket (due to efficient resolution, FCR, automation, self-service, etc.)
    Improve Access to Self-Service (tangential to improve customer service) High utilization of knowledgebase
    High utilization of portal

    Download the Service Desk Metrics Workbook

    Activity 2. Define action-based metrics that align with your KPIs and CSFs

    1. Now that you have defined your goals, continue to fill the workbook by choosing metrics that align with those goals.
    2. Use the chart below as a guide. For every metric, define the cadence of measurement, audience of the metric, and action associated with the metric. There may be multiple metrics for each KPI.
    3. If you find you are unable to define the cadence, audience, or action associated with a metric, you may not need to track the metric in the first place. Alternatively, if you find that you may action a metric in the future, you can decide to start gathering data now.

    Example metrics:

    Critical success factor Key performance indicator Metric Cadence Audience Action
    High End-User Satisfaction Increasing CSAT score on transactional surveys Monthly average of ticket satisfaction scores Monthly Management Action low scores immediately, view long-term trends
    High end-user satisfaction score Average end-user satisfaction score from annual survey Annually IT Leadership View IT satisfaction trends to align IT with business direction
    Proper resolution of tickets Number of tickets reopened Weekly Service Desk Technicians Action reopened tickets, look for training opportunities
    SLA breach rate Daily Service Desk Technicians Action reopened tickets, look for training opportunities
    Low time to resolve Average TTR (incidents) Weekly Management Look for trends to monitor resources
    Average TTR by priority Weekly Management Look for TTR solve rates to align with SLA
    Average TTR by tier Weekly Management Look for improperly escalated tickets or shift-left opportunities

    Download the Service Desk Metrics Workbook

    Activity 3. Define the data ownership, metric viability, and dashboards

    1. For each metric, define where the data is housed. Ideally, the data is directly in the ticketing tool or ITSM tool. This will make it easy to pull and analyze.
    2. Determine how difficult the metric will be to pull or track. If the effort is high, decide if the value of tracking the metric is worth the hassle of gathering it.
    3. Lastly, for each metric, use the cadence and audience to place the metric in a reporting dashboard. This will help divide your metrics and make them easier to report and action.
    4. You may use the output of this exercise to add your tracked metrics to your service desk SOP.
    5. A full suite of metrics can be found in our Infrastructure & Operations Metrics Library in the Take Control of Infrastructure Metrics Storyboard. The metrics have been categorized by low, medium, and advanced capabilities for you.

    Example metrics:

    Metric Who Owns the Data? Efforts to Track? Dashboards
    Monthly average of ticket satisfaction scores Service Desk Low Monthly Management Meeting
    Average end-user satisfaction score Service Desk Low Leadership Meeting
    Number of tickets reopened Service Desk Low Weekly Technician Standup
    SLA breach rate Service Desk Low Daily Technician Standup
    Average TTR (incidents) Service Desk Low Weekly Technician Standup
    Average TTR by priority Service Desk Low Weekly Technician Standup
    Average TTR by tier Service Desk Low Weekly Technician Standup
    Average TTR (SRs) Service Desk Low Weekly Technician Standup
    Number of tickets reopened Service Desk Low Daily Technician Standup

    Download the Service Desk Metrics Workbook

    Keep the following considerations in mind when defining which metrics matter

    Keep the customer in mind

    Metrics are typically focused on transactional efficiency and process effectiveness and not what was achieved against the customers’ need and satisfaction.

    Understand the relationships between performance and metrics management to provide the end-to-end service delivery picture you are aiming to achieve.

    Don’t settle for tool defaults

    ITSM solutions offer an abundance of metrics to choose from. The most common ones are typically built into the reporting modules of the tool suite.

    Do not start tracking everything. Choose metrics that are specifically aligned to your organization’s desired business outcomes.

    Establish tension metrics to achieve balance

    Don’t ignore the correlation and context between the suites of metrics chosen and how one interacts and affects the other.

    Measuring metrics in isolation may lead to an incomplete picture or undesired technician behavior. Tension metrics help complete the picture and lead to proper actions.

    Adjust those targets

    An arbitrary target on a metric that is consistently met month over month is useless. Each metric should inform the overall performance by combining capable service level management and customer experience programs to prove the value IT is providing to the organization.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Standardize the Service Desk

    This project will help you build and improve essential service desk processes, including incident management, request fulfillment, and knowledge management, to create a sustainable service desk.

    Take Control of Infrastructure and Operations Metrics

    Make faster decisions and improve service delivery by using the right metrics for the job.

    Analyze Your Service Desk Ticket Data

    Take a data-driven approach to service desk optimization.

    IT Diagnostics: Build a Data-Driven IT Strategy

    Our data-driven programs ask business and IT stakeholders the right questions to ensure you have the inputs necessary to build an effective IT strategy.

    Leverage Agile Goal Setting for Improved Employee Engagement & Performance

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}593|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Manage & Coach
    • Parent Category Link: /manage-coach
    • Managers are responsible for driving the best performance out of their staff while still developing individuals professionally.
    • Micromanaging tasks is an ineffective, inefficient way to get things done and keep employees engaged at the same time.
    • Both managers and employees view goal setting as a cumbersome process that never materializes in day-to-day work.
    • Without a consistent and agile goal-setting environment that pervades every day, managers risk low productivity and disengaged employees.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Effective performance management occurs throughout the year, on a daily and weekly basis, not just at annual performance review time. Managers must embrace this reality and get into the habit of setting agile short-term goals to drive productivity.
    • Employee empowerment is one of the most significant contributors to employee engagement, which is a proven performance driver. Short-term goal setting, which is ultimately employee-owned, develops and nurtures a strong sense of employee empowerment.
    • Micromanaging employee tasks will get managers nowhere quickly. Putting in the effort to collaboratively define goals that benefit both the organization and the employee will pay off in the long run.
    • Goal setting should not be a cumbersome activity, but an agile, rolling habit that ensures employees are focused, supported, and given appropriate feedback to continue to drive performance.

    Impact and Result

    • Managers who have daily meetings to set goals are 17% more successful in terms of employee performance than managers who set goals annually.
    • Managers must be agile goal-setting role models, or risk over a third of their staff being confused about productivity expectations.
    • Managers that allow tracking of goals to be an inhibitor to goal setting are most likely to have a negative effect on employee performance success. In fact, tracking goals should not be a priority in the short-term.

    Leverage Agile Goal Setting for Improved Employee Engagement & Performance Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Learn the agile, short-term goal-setting process

    Implement agile goal setting with your team right away and drive performance.

    • Storyboard: Leverage Agile Goal Setting for Improved Employee Engagement & Performance
    [infographic]

    Implement DevOps Practices That Work

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}155|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.1/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $42,916 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 20 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Development
    • Parent Category Link: /development
    • In today’s world, business agility is essential to stay competitive. Quick responses to business needs through efficient development and deployment practices are critical for business value delivery.
    • Organizations are looking to DevOps as an approach to rapidly deliver changes, but they often lack the foundations to use DevOps effectively.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Even in a highly tool-centric view, it is the appreciation of DevOps core principles that will determine your success in implementing its practices.

    Impact and Result

    • Understand the basics of DevOps-related improvements.
    • Assess the health and conduciveness of software delivery process through Info-Tech Research Group’s MATURE framework.

    Implement DevOps Practices That Work Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should implement DevOps, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Examine your current state

    Understand the current state of your software delivery process and categorize existing challenges in it.

    • DevOps Readiness Survey

    2. MATURE your delivery lifecycle

    Brainstorm solutions using Info-Tech Research Group’s MATURE framework.

    • DevOps Roadmap Template

    3. Choose the right metrics and tools for your needs

    Identify metrics that are insightful and valuable. Determine tools that can help with DevOps practices implementation.

    • DevOps Pipeline Maturity Assessment

    4. Select horizons for improvement

    Lay out a schedule for enhancements for your software process to make it ready for DevOps.

    [infographic]

    Workshop: Implement DevOps Practices That Work

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Examine Your Current State

    The Purpose

    Set the context for improvement.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Provide a great foundation for an actionable vision and goals that people can align to.

    Activities

    1.1 Review the outcome of the DevOps Readiness Survey.

    1.2 Articulate the current-state delivery process.

    1.3 Categorize existing challenges using PEAS.

    Outputs

    Baseline assessment of the organization’s readiness for introducing DevOps principles in its delivery process

    A categorized list of challenges currently evident in the delivery process

    2 MATURE Your Delivery Lifecycle

    The Purpose

    Brainstorm solutions using the MATURE framework.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Collaborative list of solutions to challenges that are restricting/may restrict adoption of DevOps in your organization.

    Activities

    2.1 Brainstorm solutions for identified challenges.

    2.2 Understand different DevOps topologies within the context of strong communication and collaboration.

    Outputs

    A list of solutions that will enhance the current delivery process into one which is influenced by DevOps principles

    (Optional) Identify a team topology that works for your organization.

    3 Choose the Right Metrics and Tools for Your Needs

    The Purpose

    Select metrics and tools for your DevOps-inspired delivery pipeline.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Enable your team to select the right metrics and tool chain that support the implementation of DevOps practices.

    Activities

    3.1 Identify metrics that are sensible and provide meaningful insights into your organization’s DevOps transition.

    3.2 Determine the set of tools that satisfy enterprise standards and can be used to implement DevOps practices.

    3.3 (Optional) Assess DevOps pipeline maturity.

    Outputs

    A list of metrics that will assist in measuring the progress of your organization’s DevOps transition

    A list of tools that meet enterprise standards and enhance delivery processes

    4 Define Your Release, Communication, and Next Steps

    The Purpose

    Build a plan laying out the work needed to be done for implementing the necessary changes to your organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Roadmap of steps to take in the coming future.

    Activities

    4.1 Create a roadmap for future-state delivery process.

    Outputs

    Roadmap for future-state delivery process

    Take Advantage of Big Tech Layoffs

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}573|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Attract & Select
    • Parent Category Link: /attract-and-select

    Tech layoffs have been making the news over the past year, with thousands of Big Tech employees having been laid off. After years of record low unemployment in IT, many leaders are looking to take advantage of these layoffs to fill their talent gaps.

    However, IT leaders need to determine their response – wait and see the impact of the recession on budgets and candidate expectations, or dive in and secure great talent to execute today on strategic needs. This research is designed to help those IT leaders who are looking to take advantage employee effective talents to secure talent.

    • With the impact of the economic slowdown still unknown, the first question IT leaders need to ask is whether now is the time to act.
    • Even with these layoffs, IT unemployment rates are at record lows, with many organizations continuing to struggle to attract talent. While these layoffs have opened a window, IT leaders need to act quickly to secure great talent.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    The “where has the talent gone?” puzzle has been solved. Many tech firms over-hired and were able to outcompete everyone, but it wasn’t sustainable. This correction won’t impact unemployment numbers in the short term – the job force is just in flux right now.

    Impact and Result

    This research is designed to help IT leaders understand the talent market and to provide winning tactics to those looking to take advantage of the layoffs to fill their hiring needs.

    Take Advantage of Big Tech Layoffs Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Take Advantage of Big Tech Layoffs Storyboard – A snapshot of the current talent market in IT and quick tactics IT leaders can employ to improve their hiring process to find and attract tech talent.

    Straightforward tactics you can execute to successfully recruit IT staff impacted by layoffs.

    • Take Advantage of Big Tech Layoffs Storyboard

    2. IT Talent Acquisition Optimization Tool – Use this tool to document the current and future talent acquisition process.

    To hire efficiently, create a clear, consistent talent acquisition process. The IT Talent Acquisition Process Optimization Tool will help to:

  • Map out the current talent acquisition workflow
  • Identify areas of opportunity and potential gaps in the current process
    • IT Talent Acquisition Optimization Tool
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Take Advantage of Big Tech Layoffs

    Simple tactics to secure the right talent in times of economic uncertainty.

    Why are the layoffs making the news?

    After three years of record low unemployment rates in IT and organizations struggling to hire IT talent into their organization, the window appears to be opening with tens of thousands layoffs from Big Tech employers.

    Big brand organizations such as Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Twitter, Netflix, and Meta have been hitting major newswires, but these layoffs aren't exclusive to the big names. We've also seen smaller high-growth tech organizations following suit. In fact, in 2022, it's estimated that there were more than 160,997 layoffs across over 1,045 tech organizations. This trend has continued into 2023. By mid-February 2023, there were already 108,754 employees laid off at 385 tech companies (Layoffs.fyi).(1)

    While some of these layoffs have been openly connected to economic slowdown, others are pointing to the layoffs being a correction for over-hiring during the pandemic. It is also important to note that many of these workers were not IT employees, as these organizations also saw cuts across other areas of the business such as sales, marketing, recruitment, and operations.

    (1)This global database is constantly being updated, and these numbers are changing on an ongoing basis. For up-to-date statistics, see https://layoffs.fyi

    While tech layoffs have been making the news, so far many of these layoffs have been a correction to over-hiring, with most employees laid off finding work, if they want it, within three months.

    IT leaders need to determine their response – wait and see the impact of the recession on budgets and candidate expectations or dive in and secure great talent to execute today on strategic needs.

    This research is designed to help IT leaders understand the talent market and provide winning strategies to those looking to take advantage of the layoffs to fill their hiring needs.

    Three key drivers for Big Tech layoffs

    Economic uncertainty

    Globally, economists are predicting an economic slowdown, though there is not a consistent prediction on the impact. We have seen an increase in interest rates and inflation, as well as reduced investment budgets.

    Over-hiring during the pandemic

    High growth and demand for digital technologies and services during the early pandemic led to over-hiring in the tech industry. Many organizations overestimated the future demand and had to rebalance staffing as a result.

    New automation investments

    Many tech organizations that have conducted layoffs are still in a growth mindset. This is demonstrated though new tech investments by these companies in products like chatbots and RPA to semi-automate processes to reduce the need for certain roles.

    Despite layoffs, the labor market remains competitive

    There were at least 160,997 layoffs from more than 1,045 tech companies last year (2022). (Layoffs.fyi reported as of Feb 21/2023)

    But just because Big Tech is laying people off doesn't mean the IT job market has cooled.

    Between January and October 2022 technology- focused job postings rose 25% compared to the same period in 2021, and there were more than 375,000 tech jobs posted in October of 2022.
    (Dice: Tech Jobs Report.)

    Info-Tech Insight

    The "where has the talent gone?" puzzle has been solved. Many tech firms over-hired and were able to outcompete everyone, but it wasn't sustainable. This correction won't impact unemployment numbers in the short term – the job force is just in flux right now.

    So far, many of the layoffs have been a market correction

    Tech Layoffs Since COVID-19

    This is an image of a combo line graph plotting the number of tech layoffs from Q1 2020 to Q4 2022.

    Source: Layoffs.fyi - Tech Layoff Tracker and Startup Layoff Lists

    Tech Companies Layoffs vs. Early Pandemic Hiring # of People

    This is an image of a bar graph plotting Tech Companies Layoffs vs. Early Pandemic Hiring # of People

    Source: Yahoo Finance. Q4 '19 to Q3 '22

    Tech Layoffs between 2020 Q3- 2022 Q1 remained very low across the sector. In fact, outside of the initial increase at the start of the pandemic, layoffs have remained at historic low levels of around 1% (HBR, 2023). While the layoffs look significant in isolation, when you compare these numbers to pandemic hiring and growth for these organizations, the figures are relatively small.

    The first question IT leaders need to ask is whether now is the time to act

    The big gamble many CIOs face is whether to strike now to secure talent or to wait to better understand the impact of the recession. While two-thirds of IT professionals are still expecting their budgets to increase in 2023, CIOs must account for the impact of inflation and the recession on their IT budgets and staffing decisions (see Info-Tech's CEO-CIO Alignment Program).

    Ultimately, while unemployment is low today, it's common to see unemployment numbers drop right before a recession. If that is the case, then we will see more talent entering the market, possibly at more competitive salaries. But organizations that wait to hire risk not having the staff they need to execute on their strategy and finding themselves in a hiring freeze. CIOs need to decide on how to approach the economic uncertainty and where to place their bets.

    Looking ahead to 2023, how do you anticipate your IT spending will change compared to spending in 2022?

    This is an image of anticipated changes to IT spending compared to 2022 for the following categories: Decrease of more than 30%; Decrease between 16-30%; Decrease between 6-15%; Decrease between 1-5%; No Change; Increase between 1-5%; Increase between 6-15%; Increase between 16-30%; Increase of more than 30%

    Info-Tech's CEO-CIO Alignment Program

    Organizations ready to take advantage will need to act fast when layoffs happen

    Organizations looking to fill hiring needs or grow their IT/digital organization will need to be strategic and efficient when it comes to recruitment. Regardless of the number of layoffs, it continues to be an employee market when it comes to IT roles.

    While it is likely that the recession will impact unemployment rates, so far, the market remains hot, and the number of open roles continues to grow. This means that organizations that want to take advantage need to act quickly when news hits.

    Leaders not only need to compete with other organizations for talent, but the other challenge hiring organizations will need to compete with is that many in tech received generous severance packages and will be considering taking time off. To take advantage, leaders need to establish a plan and a clear employee value proposition to entice these highly skilled workers to get off the bench.

    Why you need to act fast:

    • Unemployment rates remain low:
      • Tech unemployment's rates in the US dropped to 1.5% in January 2023 (CompTIA), compared to overall unemployment which is at 3.4% in the US as of January 2023 (Yahoo Finance). While the layoffs look significant, we can see that many workers have been rehired into the labor market.
    • Long time-to-hire results in lost candidates:
      • According to Info-Tech's IT Talent Trend Report, 58% of IT leaders report time-to-hire is longer than two months. This timing increases for tech roles which require unique skills or higher seniority. IT leaders who can increase the timeline for their requirement process are much more likely to be able to take advantage of tech layoffs.

    IT must take a leading role in IT recruitment to take advantage of layoffs

    A personal connection is the differentiator when it comes to talent acquisition

    There is a statistically significant relationship between IT leadership involvement in talent acquisition and the effectiveness of this process in the IT department. The more involved they are, the higher the effectiveness.(1)

    More IT leadership involvement

    An image of two upward facing arrows. The left arrow is faded purple, and the right arrow is dark purple.

    Higher recruitment effectiveness

    Involved leaders see shorter times to hire

    There is a statistically significant relationship between IT leadership involvement in the talent acquisition process and time to fill vacant positions. The more involved they are, the shorter the time to hire.(2)

    Involved leaders are an integral part of effective IT departments

    There is a statistically significant relationship between IT leadership involvement in talent acquisition and overall IT department effectiveness. Those that are more involved have higher levels of effectiveness.(3)

    Increased IT Leadership in Recruitment Is Directly Correlated to Recruitment Effectiveness.

    This is an image of a combo bar graph plotting Overall Effectiveness for IT leadership involvement in recruitment.

    Focus your layoff recruitment strategy on critical and strategic roles

    If you are ready to take advantage of tech layoffs, focus hiring on critical and strategic roles, rather than your operational backfills. Roles related to security, cloud migration, data and analytics, and digital transformation are more likely to be shielded from budget cuts and are logical areas to focus on when looking to recruit from Big Tech organizations.

    Additionally, within the IT talent market, scarcity is focused in areas with specialized skill sets, such as security and architecture, which are dynamic and evolving faster than other skill sets. When looking to recruit in these areas, it's critical that you have a targeted recruitment approach; this is why tech layoffs represent a strong opportunity to secure talent in these specialized areas.

    ROLES DIFFICULT TO FILL

    An image of a bar graph plotting roles by difficulty to fill.

    Info-Tech Talent Trends 2022 Survey

    Four quick tactics to take advantage of Big Tech layoffs

    TALENT ACQUISITION PROCESS TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF LAYOFFS

    This is an image of the talent acquisition process to take advantage of layoffs. It involves the following four steps: 1 Prepare organization and job ads for recruitment.  2 Actively track and scan for layoff activity.  3 Prioritize and screen candidates using salary benchmarks and keywords.  4 Eliminate all unnecessary hiring process steps.

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4

    Call #1: Scope requirements, objectives, and your specific challenges.

    Call #2: IT job ad review.

    Call #4: Identify screening and sourcing opportunities.

    Call #5: Review your IT talent acquisition process.

    Call #3: Employee value proposition review.

    Call #7: Refine your talent acquisition process.

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is 8 to 12 calls over the course of 4 to 6 months.

    Tactics to take advantage of tech layoffs

    Activities

    1.1 Spot check your employee value proposition
    1.2 Update job advertisements
    1.3 Document your talent acquisition process
    1.4 Refine your talent acquisition process

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive leadership
    • IT hiring manager
    • Human resources
    • Marketing/public relations

    Outcomes of this step

    Streamlined talent acquisition process tailored to take advantage of tech layoffs.

    This is an image of the talent acquisition process to take advantage of layoffs. It involves the following fo steps: 1 Prepare organization and job ads for recrtment.  2 Actively track and scan for layoff aivity.  3 Prioritize and screen candidates using salary benchmarks and kwords.  4 Eliminate all unnecessary hiring process steps.

    Requisition: update job ads and secure approval to hire

    Critical steps:

    1. Ensure you have secured budget and hiring approval.
    2. Identify an IT recruitment partner within the IT organization who will be accountable for working with HR throughout the process and who will actively track and scan for recruitment opportunities.
    3. Update your IT job descriptions.
    4. Spot check your employee value proposition (EVP) to appeal to targeted candidates (Exercise 1.1).
    5. Write employee job ads for relevant skills and minimum viable experience (Exercise 1.2).
    6. Work with HR to develop your candidate outreach messages – ensure that your outreach is empathetic, aligns with your EVP, and focuses on welcoming them to apply to a role.

    The approval process to activate a requisition can be one of the longest stages in the talent acquisition process. Ensure all your roles are up to date and approved so you can trigger outreach as soon as news hits; otherwise, you'll be late before you've even begun.

    Your employee value proposition (EVP) is a key tool for attracting and retaining talent

    Any updates to your EVP need to be a genuine reflection of the employee experience at your organization – and should resonate internally and externally.

    Internal (retention) perspective: These characteristics help to retain new and existing talent by ensuring that new hires' expectations are met and that the EVP is experienced throughout the organization.

    External (attraction) perspective: These characteristics help to attract talent and are targeted so the right candidates are motivated to join, while those who aren't a good fit will self-select out.

    McLean & Company's Employee Value Proposition Framework

    This is an image of McLean & Company's Employee Value Proposition Framework.  It is divided into Retain and Attract.  under Retain, are the following three headings: Aligned; Accurate; Aspirational.  Under Attract are: Compelling; Clear; Comprehensive.

    Source: McLean & Company

    1.1 Spot check your EVP

    1-3 hours

    1. Review your existing IT employee value proposition. If you do not have an EVP, see Info-Tech's comprehensive research Improve the IT Recruitment Process to draft a new EVP.
    2. Invite a representative group of employees to participate in a working group to improve your employee value proposition. Ask each participant to brainstorm the top five things they value most about working at the organization.
    3. Consider the following categories: work environment, career advancement, benefits, and ESG and diversity impact. Brainstorm as a group if there is anything unique your organization offers with regard to these categories.
    4. Compare your notes to your existing EVP, identify up to four key statements to focus on for the EVP, ensuring that your EVP speaks to at least one of the categories above. Remove any statements that no longer speak to who you are as an organization or what you offer.

    Input

    • Existing employee value proposition
    • Employee Engagement Surveys (If Available)

    Output

    • Updated employee value proposition

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Job ad template

    Participants

    • Representative group of internal employees.
    • HR
    • Marketing/PR (if possible)

    Four critical factors considered by today's job seeker

    1. Be specific about remote work policies: Include verbiage about whether there is an option to work hybrid or remote. 81% of job seekers stated that whether a job is remote, hybrid, or in-person was a top factor in whether they'd accept an offer (Benefits Canada, 2022).
    2. Career advancement and stability: "37% of Gen Z employees and 25% of millennial employees are currently looking for a job that offers career progression transparency — or, in other words, a job with clear opportunities for growth. This is significantly higher than our findings for older generations Gen X (18%) and baby boomers (7%)," (Lattice, 2021).
    3. Unique benefits: Consider your unique benefits – it's not the Big Tech "fun perks" like slides and ping pong that drive interest. Employees are increasingly looking for roles with long-term benefits programs. 90% of job seekers consider higher pension contributions to be a key factor, and 85% are considering bonuses/profit sharing" (Benefits Canada, 2022). Candidates may accept lower total compensation in exchange for flexibility, culture, work/life balance that was lacking in the start-up scene or the mega-vendors' fast-paced world.
    4. ESG and diversity impact: Include details of how the candidate will make a societal impact through their role, and how the company is acting on climate and sustainability. "Nearly two in five [Gen Z's and millennials] say they have rejected a job or assignment because it did not align with their values," (Deloitte Global, 2022).

    Update or establish job ads for candidate outreach

    Take the time up front to update your IT job descriptions and to write effective job advertisements. A job advertisement is an external-facing document that advertises a position with the intent of attracting job applicants. It contains key elements from the job description as well as information on the organization and its EVP. A job description informs a job ad, it doesn't replace it.
    When updating job descriptions and job ads, it's critical that your requirements are an accurate representation of what you need in the position. For the job ads especially, focus on the minimum requirements for the role, highlight your employee value proposition, and ensure that they are using inclusive language.
    Don't be lulled into using a job description as a posting when there's a time crunch to fill a position – use your preparation time to complete this key step.

    Three tips to consider when building a job ad

    Include the minimum desired requirements

    Include the required skills, responsibilities, and certifications required. Instead of looking for a unicorn, look for what you need and a demonstrated ability to learn. 70% of business executives say they are getting creative about sourcing for skills rather than just considering job experience (Deloitte Insights, 2022).

    Strategically include certifications

    When including certifications, ensure you have validated the process to be certified – i.e. if you are hiring for a role with 3-5 years' experience, ensure that the certification does not take 5-10 years of experience be eligible.

    Use inclusive language

    Consider having a review group within your IT organization to ensure the language is inclusive, that the responsibilities don't read as overly complex, and that it is an accurate representation of the organization's culture.

    1.2 Update or build job ads

    1-3 hours

    1. Begin with a copy of the job ad you are looking to fill, if you haven't begun to draft the role, start with Info-Tech's Job Description Library and Info-Tech's Job Ad Template.
    2. Review the job accountabilities, rank each responsibility based on its importance and volume of work. Determine if there are any responsibilities that are uncommon to be executed by the role and remove unnecessary responsibilities.
    3. For each of the job accountabilities, identify if there is a level of experience, knowledge or competency that would be the minimum bar for a candidate. Remove technical skills, specific technologies, and competencies that aren't directly relevant to the role, responsibilities or values.
    4. Review the education and requirements, and ensure that any certification or educational background is truly needed or suggested.
    5. Use the checklist on the following tab to review and update your job ad.

    Input

    • Job description
    • Employee value proposition
    • Job ad template

    Output

    • Completed job ad

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Web share

    Participants

    • Representative group of internal employees.
    • HR
    • Marketing/PR (if possible)

    1.2 Job ad checklist:

    A job ad needs to be two things: effective and inclusive.

    Effective

    The job ad does include:

    The organization's logo.
    Description of the organization.
    Information about benefits.
    A link to the organization's website and social media platforms.
    Steps in the application process and what candidates can expect.

    The job ad:

    Paints an accurate picture of key aspects of the role.
    Tells a story to show potential candidates how the role and organization will fit into their career path (outlines potential career paths, growth opportunities, training, etc.).
    Does not contain too many details and tasks that would overwhelm applicants.
    Highlights the employer brand in a manner that conveys the EVP and markets the organization to attract potential applicants.
    Includes creative design or formatting to make the ad stand out.
    The job ad speaks to the audience by using targeted language (e.g. using creative language when recruiting for a creative role).
    The job ad has been reviewed by HR, Marketing, PR.

    Inclusive

    The job ad does NOT include:

    Industry jargon or abbreviations that are not spelled out.
    Personality characteristics and unnecessary adjectives that would deter qualified candidates (e.g. extroverted, aggressive, competitive).
    A list of specific academic disciplines or schools, GPA requirements, or inflated degree requirements.

    The job ad:

    Uses gender-neutral language and does not contain terms that indicate traits that are typically associated with a specific gender.
    Can be viewed and applications can be completed on mobile devices.
    Focuses on results, day-to-day requirements, competencies, and transferrable skills.
    Includes design that is accessible (e.g. alternative text is provided for images, clear posting structure with headings, color is not used to convey information).

    Sourcing: Set up news trackers and review layoff source lists

    • Set up news and social media trackers to track layoff updates, and ensure you have an IT staff member on standby to complete a more detailed opportunity analysis when layoffs happen.
    • Use layoff source lists such as Layoffs.fyi to actively track organizations that have laid people off, noting the industry, location, and numbers in order to identify potential candidates. Limit your future analysis to locations that would be geographically possible to hire from.
    • Review open-source lists of laid-off employees to quickly identify potential candidates for your organization.
    • Many organizations that have completed layoffs have established outplacement programs to help laid-off staff find new roles. Set a plan in motion with HR to reach out to organizations once a layoff has occurred to understand their layoff support program.

    The key to successful sourcing is for IT to take an active role in identifying which organizations impacted by layoffs would be a good fit, and to quickly respond by searching open-source lists and LinkedIn to reach out potential candidates.

    Consider leveraging open-source lists

    Layoffs.fyi has been tracking and reporting on layoffs since the start of COVID-19. While they are not an official source of information, the site has more than a million views per month and is a strong starting point for IT leaders looking to source candidates from tech layoffs beyond the big organizations that are making the news.

    The site offers a view of companies with layoffs by location, industry, and the source of the info. Additionally, it often lists the names and contact information of laid-off employees, which you can leverage to start your deeper LinkedIn outreach or candidate screening.

    This is an image of two screenshots of open source lists from Layoffs.fyi

    Screenshots from Layoffs.fyi.

    Screening: Prioritize by considering salary benchmarks and keywords

    • Determine a set of consistent pre-screening questions to leverage while screening candidates, which every candidate must answer, including knockout questions.
    • Prioritize by going for salary ranges you can afford: It is important to be aware of what companies are paying within the tech arena, so you know if your salary bands are within a competitive range.
    • Pre-screen resumes using appropriate keywords that are critical for the role, and widen the terms if you do not have enough candidates. Given the pool you are looking to recruit from, consider removing criteria specifically related to education or certifications; instead, prioritize skills and on-the-job experience.

    Screening is one of the most time-consuming stages of the TA process. For each open position, it can take 23 hours to screen resumes (Toolbox, 2021). In fact, 52% of TA leaders believe that screening candidates from a large pool of applicants is the hardest part of recruitment (Ideal, 2021).

    Compensation comparison reports

    Keep in mind that the market may be shifting rapidly as layoffs proliferate, so what the data shows, particularly on free-to-use sites with little data-checking, may not be current and may be overstated. Info-Tech does not provide salary analysis; however, there are publicly available reports and online websites with self-reported data.

    This list contains several market data sources for the tech industry, which may be a good starting point for comparison. Info-Tech is not affiliated with or endorsing any of these market data sources.

    Aon Global Cyber Security Compensation and Talent Survey
    Aon – Radford Surveys Radford Global Technology Survey
    Culpepper Comprehensive Compensation Survey Solution for Technology-Focused Companies
    Modis 2022 IT Compensation Guide
    Motion Recruitment 2023 Tech Salary Guide
    Mondo 2022 Salary Guide for roles & jobs across the technology, creative & digital marketing industries.
    Willis Towers Watson Willis Towers Watson Data Services - Artificial Intelligence and Digital Talent
    Willis Towers Watson 2022 Artificial Intelligence and Digital Talent Survey Report - Canada
    Willis Towers Watson 2022 Artificial Intelligence and Digital Talent Survey Report - U.S.
    Michael Page Salary Guide 2022 for the Greater Toronto Area Technology Industry
    Willis Towers Watson Willis Towers Watson Data Services - Tech, Media, and Gaming
    Willis Towers Watson 2022 Tech, Media and Gaming Executive Survey Report - Canada
    Willis Towers Watson 2022 Tech, Media and Gaming Middle Management, Professional and Support Survey Report - Canada
    Willis Towers Watson 2022 Tech, Media and Gaming Executive Survey Report - U.S.
    Willis Towers Watson 2022 Tech, Media and Gaming Middle Management, Professional and Support Survey Report - U.S.

    Work with your HR partner to streamline your talent acquisition process

    A slow talent acquisition process presents multiple risks to your ability to recruit. Candidates are likely having multiple hiring conversations, and you could lose a good candidate just by being slower than another organization. Additionally, long hiring processes are also an indicator of a high level of bureaucracy in an organization, which may turn off tech candidates who are used to faster-paced decision making.

    Reducing your time-to-hire needs to be a strategic priority, and companies that manage to do this are reaping the benefits: There is a statistically significant relationship between time to fill vacant positions and overall IT department effectiveness. The shorter the time to fill a position, the higher the effectiveness (Bika, 2019).

    Key Considerations for Optimizing your Talent Acquisition Process

    Key Considerations for Optimizing your Talent Acquisition Process

    Review the end-to-end experience

    50%

    of job seekers surveyed had "declined a job offer due to poor [candidate] experience," (Echevarria, 2020).

    Reduce the time to hire

    55%

    "of candidates believe that it should take one to two weeks from the first interview to being offered the job," (Duszyński, 2021).

    Be clear on Timelines

    83%

    "of candidates say it would greatly improve the overall experience if employers provided a clear timeline of the hiring process," (Miller, n.d.).

    Time to hire: Identify solutions to drive efficient hiring

    1. Document all steps between screening and hiring and remove any unnecessary steps.
    2. Create clearly defined interview guides to ensure consistent questioning by interviewers.
    3. Enable hiring managers to schedule their own interviews.
    4. Determine who needs to approve an offer. Streamline the number of approvals, if possible.
    5. Eliminate unnecessary background checks. Many companies have eliminated reference checks, for example, after determining that it was it was not adding value to their decision.
    6. Identify and track key metrics across your talent acquisition process.

    It is critical to partner with your HR department on optimizing this process, as they are typically the process owners and will have deep knowledge of the rationale for decisions. Together, you can identify some opportunities to streamline the process and improve the time to hire.

    4.1 Document your TA process

    1-3 hours

    1. If you have a documented talent acquisition process, begin with that; if not, open the IT Talent Acquisition Process Optimization Tool and map the stages of the talent acquisition process with your HR leader. Stages are the top level in the process (e.g. requisition, sourcing, screening).
    2. Identify all the stakeholders involved in IT talent acquisition and document these in the tool.
    3. Next, identify the steps required for each stage. These are more detailed actions that together will complete the stage (e.g. enter requisition into ATS, intake meeting). Ask subject matter experts to add steps to their portion of the process and document these in the cells.
    4. For each step in the stage, record the time required and the number of people who are involved.

    Input

    • Existing talent acquisition (TA) process document
    • Any TA process metrics
    • Info-Tech's Talent Acquisition Process Optimization Tool

    Output

    • Documented TA process

    Materials

    • Info-Tech's Talent Acquisition Process Optimization Tool
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • HR
    • IT leaders
    • Hiring manager

    Download the IT Talent Acquisition Process Optimization Tool

    Example of steps in each stage of the TA process

    Activities

    Requisition

    Source

    Screen

    Interview & Assess

    Offer

    Background Check

    Vacancy identified Posted on website Resumes screened in system Interviews scheduled Offer letter drafted Reference checks conducted
    Requisition submitted Posted on job boards Resume screened by recruited First round interviews Offer letter sent Medical checks conducted
    Requisition approved Identification of layoff sources Resumed reviewed by hiring manager Assessment Negotiations Other background checks conducted
    Job description updated Review layoff source lists Screening calls Second round interview First date confirmed
    Job ad updated Screening questions developed Candidates selected
    Intake meeting

    4.2 Refine your TA process

    1-3 hours

    1. Collectively identify any:
      1. Inconsistent applications: Activities that are done differently by different participants.
      2. Bottlenecks: A place in the process where activity is constrained and holds up next steps.
      3. Errors: When a mistake occurs requiring extra time, resources, or rework.
      4. Lack of value: An activity that adds little to no value (often a legacy activity).
    2. Work with HR to identify any proposed solutions to improve consistency, reduce bottlenecks, errors, or eliminate steps that lack value. Document your proposed solutions in tab 3 of the IT Talent Acquisition Optimization Tool.
    3. Identify any new steps needed that would drive greater efficiency, including the tactics suggested in this research. Document any proposed solutions in tab 3.
    4. For each proposed solution, evaluate the general level of effort and impact required to move forward with that solution and select the appropriate classification from the drop-down.
    5. Determine if you will move forward with the proposed solution at this time. Update the TA workflow with your decisions.

    Input

    • Existing talent acquisition (TA) process document
    • Any TA process metrics
    • Info-Tech's Talent Acquisition Process Optimization Tool

    Output

    • Documented TA process

    Materials

    • Info-Tech's Talent Acquisition Process Optimization Tool
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • HR
    • IT leaders
    • Hiring manager

    Use Info-Tech's IT Talent Acquisition Optimization Tool to document current challenges & target solutions.

    Map your process and identify opportunities to streamline

    This is an image of the talent aquisitions workflow page from Info-Tech's Map your process and identify opportunities to streamline

    Brainstorm and select solutions to improve your process

    This is an image of the Effort Analysis page from Info-Tech's Brainstorm and select solutions to improve your process

    Key considerations when optimizing your process

    • Put yourself in each stakeholder's shoes (candidate, HR, hiring manager). Think through what they need from the process.
    • Challenge assumptions and norms. It can be tempting to get caught up in "how we do it today." Think beyond how it is today.
    • Question timing of activities and events. Identify if they are occurring when they need to.
    • Rebalance work to align with priorities. Identify if work can be redistributed or condensed to use time more efficiently.
    • Distinguish when consistency will add value and when there should be process flexibility.
    • Question the value. For each activity, ask "What value does this activity add?"

    Select metrics to measure Talent Acquisition process improvement

    METRICS INFORMATION
    Metric Definition Calculation
    Average applicants per posting The average number of applicants received per post. Number of applications / Number of postings
    Average number of interviews for open job positions Average number of interviews for open job positions. Total number of interviews / Total number of open job positions
    Average external time to fill Average number of calendar days from when the requisition is issued to when a candidate accepts the position from outside the organization. External days to fill / External candidates
    Pipeline throughput Percentage of candidates advancing through to the next stage. (Number of candidates in chosen stage / Number of candidates in preceding stage) * 100
    External offer acceptance rate Percentage of job offers extended to external candidates that were accepted. (Number of job offers that are accepted / Number of job offers extended) * 100
    Percentage of target group hired The percentage of a target group that was hired. Number of FTE hired / Target number of FTE to be hired
    Average time to hire Average number of calendar days between first contact with the candidate and when they accept the offer. Sum of number of days between first contact and offer acceptance / External candidates
    Quality of hire Percentage of new hires achieving a satisfactory appraisal at their first assessment. New hires who achieve a satisfactory rating at their first appraisal / Total number of new hires
    Vacancy rate Percentage of positions being actively recruited for at the end of the reporting period. Count of vacant positions / (Headcount + Vacant positions)

    Bibliography

    "81% of Employees Factoring Hybrid Work Into Job Search: Survey." BenefitsCanada.com, 16 June 2022.
    Andre, Louie. "40 Notable Candidate Experience Statistics: 2023 Job Application Trends & Challenges." Financesonline.Com, 15 Mar. 2023.
    Bika, Nikoletta. "Key Hiring Metrics: Useful Benchmarks for Tech Roles." Recruiting Resources: How to Recruit and Hire Better, 10 Jan. 2019.
    "Bureau of Labor Statistics Labor Market Revisions Contribute to Conflicting Signals in Latest Tech Employment Data, CompTIA Analysis Finds." CompTIA, 3 Feb. 2023. Press release.
    Byrnes, Amy. "ICIMS Insights Workforce Report: Time to Press the Reset Button?" ICIMS | The Leading Cloud Recruiting Software, 1 Dec. 2022.
    Cantrell, Sue, et al. "The Skills-Based Organization: A New Operating Model for Work and the Workforce." Deloitte Insights, 8 Sept. 2022.
    deBara, Deanna. "Top Findings from Lattice's Career Progression Survey." Lattice, 13 Sept. 2021. Accessed 16 Feb. 2023.
    Duszyński, Maciej. "Candidate Experience Statistics (Survey of 1,000+ Americans)." Zety, 14 Oct. 2019.
    Duszyński, Maciej. "Candidate Experience Statistics." Zety, 2021.
    Echevarria, Desiree. "2020 Candidate Experience Report." Career Plug, 17 Mar. 2021.
    Ghosh, Prarthana. "Candidate Screening and Selection Process: The Complete Guide for 2021." Spiceworks, 26 Feb. 2021. Accessed 22 Jun. 2021
    "Introduction - Dice Tech Job Report: Tech Hiring Trends by Location, Industry, Role and Skill." Accessed 16 Feb. 2023.
    Lee, Roger. "Tech Layoff Tracker and Startup Layoff Lists." Layoffs.fyi. Accessed 16 Feb. 2023.
    Miller, Kandace. "Candidate Experience And Engagement Metrics You Should Be Tracking." ConveyIQ, n.d. Accessed 16 Feb. 2023.
    Min, Ji-A. "Resume Screening: A How-To Guide for Recruiters." Ideal, 15 Mar. 2021. Web.
    Palmeri, Shelby. "2023 Candidate Experience Research: Strategies for Recruiting." CareerPlug, 6 Feb. 2023.
    Semenova, Alexandra. "Jobs Report: U.S. Economy Adds 517,000 Jobs in January, Unemployment Rate Falls to 3.4% as Labor Market Stuns." Yahoo!Finance, 3 Feb. 2023.
    Sozzi, Brian. "Big Tech Layoffs: What Companies Such as Amazon and Meta Have in Common." Yahoo!News, 6 Feb. 2023.
    Tarki, Atta. "Despite Layoffs, It's Still a Workers' Labor Market." Harvard Business Review, 30 Jan. 2023.
    The Deloitte Global 2022 Gen Z and Millennial Survey. Deloitte Global, 2022. Accessed 16 Feb. 2023.
    "Uncover the Employee Value Proposition." McLean & Company, 21 Jun. 2022. Accessed 22 Feb. 2023.

    IT Risk management

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}40|cart{/j2store}
    • Related Products: {j2store}40|crosssells{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Security and Risk
    • Parent Category Link: /security-and-risk
    Mitigation is about balance: take a cost-focused approach to risk management.

    Build an Information Security Strategy

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}242|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.5/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $45,303 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 34 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Security Strategy & Budgeting
    • Parent Category Link: /security-strategy-and-budgeting
    • Many security leaders struggle to decide how to best to prioritize their scarce information security resources
    • The need to move from a reactive approach to security towards a strategic planning approach is clear. The path to getting there is less so.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    The most successful information security strategies are:

    • Holistic – They consider the full spectrum of information security, including people, processes, and technology.
    • Risk aware – They understand that security decisions should be made based on the security risks facing their organization, not just on “best practice.”
    • Business aligned – They demonstrate an understanding of the goals and strategies of the organization and how the security program can support the business.

    Impact and Result

    • Info-Tech has developed a highly effective approach to building an information security strategy, an approach that has been successfully tested and refined for more than seven years with hundreds of different organizations:
    • This approach includes tools for:
      • Ensuring alignment with business objectives.
      • Assessing organizational risk and stakeholder expectations.
      • Enabling a comprehensive current state assessment.
      • Prioritizing initiatives and building out a security roadmap.

    Build an Information Security Strategy Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Information Security (IS) Strategy Research – A step-by-step document that helps you build a holistic, risk-based, and business-aligned IS strategy.

    Your security strategy should not be based on trying to blindly follow best practices but on a holistic risk-based assessment that is risk aware and aligns with your business context. Use this storyboard to augment your security strategy by ensuring alignment with business objectives, assessing your organization's risk and stakeholder expectations, understanding your current security state, and prioritizing initiatives and a security roadmap.

    • Build an Information Security Strategy – Phases 1-4

    2. Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool – A tool to make informed security risk decisions to support business needs.

    Use this tool to formally identify business goals and customer and compliance obligations and make explicit links to how security initiatives propose to support these business interests. Then define the scope and boundaries for the security strategy and the risk tolerance definitions that will guide future security risk decisions.

    • Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool

    3. Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool – An evaluation tool to invest in the right security functions using a pressure analysis approach.

    Security pressure posture analysis helps your organization assess your real security context and enables you to invest in the right security functions while balancing the cost and value in alignment with business strategies. Security pressure sets the baseline that will help you avoid over-investing or under-investing in your security functions.

    • Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool

    4. Information Security Program Gap Analysis Tool – A structured tool to systematically understand your current security state.

    Effective security planning should not be one size fits all – it must consider business alignment, security benefit, and resource cost. To enable an effective security program, all areas of security need to be evaluated closely to determine where the organization sits currently and where it needs to go in the future.

    • Information Security Program Gap Analysis Tool

    5. Information Security Strategy Communication Deck – A best-of-breed presentation document to build a clear, concise, and compelling strategy document.

    Use this communication deck template to present the results of the security strategy to stakeholders, demonstrate the progression from the current state to the future state, and establish the roadmap of the security initiatives that will be implemented. This information security communication deck will help ensure that you’re communicating effectively for your cause.

    • Information Security Strategy Communication Deck

    6. Information Security Charter – An essential document for defining the scope and purpose of a security project or program.

    A charter is an essential document for defining the scope and purpose of security. Without a charter to control and set clear objectives for this committee, the responsibility of security governance initiatives will likely be undefined within the enterprise, preventing the security governance program from operating efficiently. This template can act as the foundation for a security charter to provide guidance to the governance of information security.

    • Information Security Charter
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Build an Information Security Strategy

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Assess Security Requirements

    The Purpose

    Understand business and IT strategy and plans.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Defined security obligations, scope, and boundaries.

    Activities

    1.1 Define business and compliance.

    1.2 Establish security program scope.

    1.3 Analyze the organization’s risk and stakeholder pressures.

    1.4 Identify the organizational risk tolerance level.

    Outputs

    Security obligations statement

    Security scope and boundaries statement

    Defined risk tolerance level

    Risk assessment and pressure analysis

    2 Perform a Gap Analysis

    The Purpose

    Define the information security target state.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Set goals and Initiatives for the security strategy in line with the business objectives.

    Activities

    2.1 Assess current security capabilities.

    2.2 Identify security gaps.

    2.3 Build initiatives to bridge the gaps.

    Outputs

    Information security target state

    Security current state assessment

    Initiatives to address gaps

    3 Complete the Gap Analysis

    The Purpose

    Continue assessing current security capabilities.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Identification of security gaps and initiatives to bridge them according to the business goals.

    Activities

    3.1 Identify security gaps.

    3.2 Build initiatives to bridge the maturity gaps.

    3.3 Identify initiative list and task list.

    3.4 Define criteria to be used to prioritize initiatives.

    Outputs

    Completed security current state assessment

    Task list to address gaps

    Initiative list to address gaps

    Prioritize criteria

    4 Develop the Roadmap

    The Purpose

    Create a plan for your security strategy going forward.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Set path forward to achieving the target state for the business through goal cascade and gap initiatives.

    Activities

    4.1 Conduct cost/benefit analysis on initiatives.

    4.2 Prioritize gap initiatives based on cost and alignment with business.

    4.3 Build an effort list.

    4.4 Determine state times and accountability.

    4.5 Finalize security roadmap and action plan.

    4.6 Create communication plan.

    Outputs

    Information security roadmap

    Draft communication deck

    5 Communicate and Implement

    The Purpose

    Finalize deliverables.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Consolidate documentation into a finalized deliverable that can be used to present to executives and decision makers to achieve buy-in for the project.

    Activities

    5.1 Support communication efforts.

    5.2 Identify resources in support of priority initiatives.

    Outputs

    Security strategy roadmap documentation

    Detailed cost and effort estimates

    Mapping of Info-Tech resources against individual initiatives

    Further reading

    Build an Information Security Strategy

    Create value by aligning your strategy to business goals and business risks.

    Analyst Perspective

    Set your security strategy up for success.

    “Today’s rapid pace of change in business innovation and digital transformation is a call to action to information security leaders.

    Too often, chief information security officers find their programs stuck in reactive mode, a result of years of mounting security technical debt. Shifting from a reactive to proactive stance has never been more important. Unfortunately, doing so remains a daunting task for many.

    While easy to develop, security plans premised on the need to blindly follow ‘best practices’ are unlikely to win over many stakeholders. To be truly successful, an information security strategy needs to be holistic, risk-aware, and business-aligned.”

    Kevin Peuhkurinen

    Research Director – Security, Risk & Compliance

    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive summary

    Your Challenge

    • Many security leaders struggle to decide how best to prioritize their scarce information security resources.
    • The need to move from a reactive approach to security toward a strategic planning approach is clear. The path to getting there is less clear.

    Common Obstacle

    • Developing a security strategy can be challenging. Complications include:
      • Performing an accurate assessment of your current security program can be extremely difficult when you don’t know what to assess or how.
      • Determining the appropriate target state for security can be even more challenging. A strategy built around following best practices is unlikely to garner significant support from business stakeholders.

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    • Info-Tech has developed a highly effective approach to building an information security strategy, an approach that has been successfully tested and refined for 7+ years with hundreds of organizations.
    • This unique approach includes tools for:
      • Ensuring alignment with business objectives.
      • Assessing organizational risk and stakeholder expectations.
      • Enabling a comprehensive current state assessment.
      • Prioritizing initiatives and building out a security roadmap.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The most successful information security strategies are:

    • Holistic. They consider the full spectrum of information security, including people, processes, and technologies.
    • Risk-Aware. They understand that security decisions should be made based on the security risks facing their organization, not just on best practice.
    • Business-Aligned. They demonstrate an understanding of the goals and strategies of the organization, and how the security program can support the business.

    It’s not a matter of if you have a security incident, but when

    Organizations need to prepare and expect the inevitable security breach.

    Fifty-eight percent of companies surveyed that experienced a breach were small businesses.

    Eighty-nine percent of breaches have a financial or espionage motive.

    Three graphs are depicted. The first is labeled ‘Total Cost for Three Data Breach Root Causes,’ the second ‘Distribution of Benchmark by Root Cause of the Data Breach,’ and the third ‘Per Capita for Three Root Causes of a Data Breach.’ The three root causes are malicious or criminal attack (US$166 million per capita), system glitch ($132 million per capita), and human error ($133 million per capita).

    Source: Ponemon Institute, “2019 Global Cost of Data Breach Study”

    An information security strategy can help you prepare for incidents

    Organizations need to expect the inevitable security breach.

    90%

    of businesses have experienced an external threat in the last year.

    50%

    of IT professionals consider security to be their number one priority.

    53%

    of organizations claimed to have experienced an insider attack in the previous 12 months. 1

    46%

    of businesses believe the frequency of attacks is increasing. 2

    Effective IT leaders approach their security strategy from an understanding that attacks on their organization will occur. Building a strategy around this assumption allows your security team to understand the gaps in your current approach and become proactive instead of being reactive.

    Sources: 1 Kaspersky Lab, “Global IT Security Risks Survey”; 2 CA Technologies, “Insider Threat 2018 Report”

    Persistent Issues

    Evolving Ransomware

    • Continual changes in types and platforms make ransomware a persistent threat. The frequency of ransomware attacks was reported to have increased by 67% in the past five years. 1

    Phishing Attacks

      • Despite filtering and awareness, email remains the most common threat vector for phishing attacks (94%) and an average of 3% of participants in phishing campaigns still click on them. 2

    Insider Privilege and Misuse

    • Typically, 34% of breaches are perpetrated by insiders, with 15% involving privilege misuse. Takeaway: Care less about titles and more about access levels. 3

    Denial of Service

    • The median amount of time that an organization is under attack from DDoS attack is three days.

    Emerging Trends

    Advanced Identity and Access Governance

    • Using emerging technologies in automation, orchestration, and machine learning, the management and governance of identities and access has become more advanced.

    Sources: 1 Accenture, “2019 The Cost of Cyber Crime Study”; 2,3 Verizon, “2019 Data Breach Investigations Report”

    New threat trends in information security aren’t new.

    Previously understood attacks are simply an evolution of prior implementations, not a revolution.

    Traditionally, most organizations are not doing a good-enough job with security fundamentals, which is why attackers have been able to use the same old tricks.

    However, information security has finally caught the attention of organizational leaders, presenting the opportunity to implement a comprehensive security program.

    Cyberattacks have a significant financial impact

    Global average cost of a data breach: $3.92 Million

    Source: Ponemon Institute, “2019 Cost of a Data Breach Study: Global Overview”

    A bar graph, titled ‘Average cost of data breach by industry,’ is depicted. Of 17 industries depicted, public is the lowest average cost (US$1.29 million) and health is the highest average cost ($6.45 million).

    Primary incident type (with a confirmed data breach)

    1. Leading incident type is Denial of Service attacks (DoS), taking up to 70% of all incidents.
    2. When it comes to data breaches, we see that the use of stolen credentials leads to the most cases of confirmed breaches, accounting for 29%.

    Personal records tend to be the most compromised data types, while databases tend to be the most frequently involved asset in breaches.

    Source: Verizon, “2019 Data Breach Investigations Report”

    Security threats are not going away

    We continue to see and hear of security breaches occurring regularly.

    A bar graph depicts the percentage of businesses who experienced a data breach in the last year–US total and global total. Numbers have increased from 2016 to 2019. In 2016, 19 percent of US businesses experienced a breach. In 2019, this number was 59 percent.

    An attacker must be successful only once. The defender – you – must be successful every time.

    Info-Tech’s approach

    Maturing from reactive to strategic information security

    Two circular graphs depict the move from ‘reactive security’ to ‘strategic security’ organizations can accomplish using Info-Tech’s approach.

    Tools icon that is used in the first three stages of the strategic security graph above. Indicates Info-Tech tools included in this blueprint.

    The Info-Tech difference:

    1. A proven, structured approach to mature your information security program from reactive to strategic.
    2. A comprehensive set of tools to take the pain out of each phase in the strategy building exercise.
    3. Visually appealing templates to communicate and socialize your security strategy and roadmap to your stakeholders.

    Info-Tech’s Security Strategy Model

    Info-Tech’s Security Strategy Model is depicted in this rectangular image with arrows. The first level depicts business context (enterprise goals, compliance obligations, scope and boundaries) and pressures (security risks, risk tolerance, stakeholder expectations). The second level depicts security target state (maturity model, security framework, security alignment goals, target maturity, time frame) and current state (current state assessment, gap analysis). The third level depicts the information security roadmap (initiative list, task list, prioritization methodology, and Gantt chart).

    The Info-Tech difference:

    An information security strategy model that is:

    1. Business-Aligned. Determines business context and cascades enterprise goals into security alignment goals.
    2. Risk-Aware. Understands the security risks of the business and how they intersect with the overall organizational risk tolerance.
    3. Holistic. Leverages a best-of-breed information security framework to provide comprehensive awareness of organizational security capabilities.

    Info-Tech’s best-of-breed security framework

    This image shows how Info-Tech’s framework is based on ISO 27000 series, CIS Top 20, COBIT 2019, NIST 800-53, and NIST CSF.

    Info-Tech’s approach

    Creating an information security strategy

    Value to the business

    Outcome

    Best-of-breed security strategy

    Have documentation that paints a picture of the road to compliance. Integrate your framework with your risk tolerance and external pressures.

    Be ready for future changes by aligning your security strategy to security framework best practices.

    Address the nature of your current information security

    Eliminate gaps in process and know what is in scope for your security strategy. Learn what pressures your business and industry are under.

    Gain insight into your current state, allowing you to focus on high-value projects first, transitioning towards a target state.

    Highlight overlooked functions of your current security strategy

    Build a comprehensive security program that brings to light all aspects of your security program.

    Instead of pursing ad hoc projects, know what needs work and how to prioritize your pressing security issues.

    Create a tangible roadmap to your target state

    Create a plan for your future state of information security. Refer to and update your target state as your business needs change.

    Document your current progress and path forward in the future. Know your goals and requirements, codified in a living document.

    Use our prepopulated deliverables to fast track your progress

    Let Info-Tech do the work for you. With completed deliverables, have tangible documents to convey your business needs.

    A comprehensive set of deliverables with concrete, defensible data to justify any business changes.

    A living security strategy

    Pivot and change prioritization to meet the needs of your security deficits.

    Future-proof your security strategy for any contingency.

    The Info-Tech difference:

    Evolve the security program to be more proactive by leveraging Info-Tech’s approach to building a security strategy.

    • Dive deep into security obligations and security pressures to define the business context.
    • Conduct a thorough current state and future state analysis that is aligned with a best-of-breed framework.
    • Prioritize gap-closing initiatives to create a living security strategy roadmap.

    Use Info-Tech’s blueprint to save one to three months

    This image depicts how using Info-Tech’s four-phase blueprint can save an estimated seven to 14 weeks of an organization’s time and effort.

    Iterative benefit

    Over time, experience incremental value from your initial security strategy. Through continual updates your strategy will evolve but with less associated effort, time, and costs.

    These estimates are based on experiences with Info-Tech clients throughout the creation of this blueprint.

    Key deliverable:

    Information Security Strategy Communication Deck (PPT)

    Present your findings in a prepopulated document that can summarizes all key findings of the blueprint.

    Screenshots from Info-Tech’s Information Security Strategy Communication Deck Template.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool

    Define the business, customer, and compliance alignment for your security program.

    Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool

    Determine your organization’s security pressures and ability to tolerate risk.

    Information Security Program Gap Analysis Tool

    Use our best-of-breed security framework to perform a gap analysis between your current and target states.

    Information Security Charter

    Ensure the development and management of your security policies meet the broader program vision.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    “Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

    Workshop

    “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

    Consulting

    “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostic and consistent frameworks are used throughout all four options.

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical Guided Implementation on this topic look like?

    Guided Implementation #1 - Assess security requirements
    • Call #1 - Introduce project and complete pressure analysis.
    Guided Implementation #2 - Build a gap initiative strategy
    • Call #1 - Introduce the maturity assessment.
    • Call #2 - Perform gap analysis and translate into initiatives.
    • Call #3 - Consolidate related gap initiatives and define, cost, effort, alignment, and security benefits.
    Guided Implementation #3 - Prioritize initiatives and build roadmap
    • Call #1 - Review cost/benefit analysis and build an effort map.
    • Call #2 - Build implementation waves and introduce Gantt chart.
    Guided Implementation #4 - Execute and maintain
    • Call #1 - Review Gantt chart and ensure budget/buy-in support.
    • Call #2 - Three-month check-in: Execute and maintain.

    A Guided Implementation is series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical Guided Implementation is between 2-12 calls over the course of 4 to 6 months.

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information, or contact workshops@infotech.com or 1-888-670-8889.

    Day 1

    Day 2

    Day 3

    Day 4

    Day 5

    Activities

    Assess Security Requirements

    Perform a Gap Analysis

    Complete the Gap Analysis

    Develop Roadmap

    Communicate and Implement

    1.1 Understand business and IT strategy and plans

    1.2 Define business and compliance requirements

    1.3 Establish the security program scope

    1.4 Analyze the organization’s risks and stakeholder pressures

    1.5 Identify the organizational risk tolerance level

    2.1 Define the information security target state

    2.2 Assess current security capabilities

    2.3 Identify security gaps

    2.4 Build initiatives to bridge the gaps

    3.1 Continue assessing current security capabilities

    3.2 Identify security gaps

    3.3 Build initiatives to bridge the maturity gaps

    3.4 Identify initiative list and task list

    3.5 Define criteria to be used to prioritize initiatives

    4.1 Conduct cost/benefit analysis on initiatives

    4.2 Prioritize gap initiatives based on cost, time, and alignment with the business

    4.3 Build effort map

    4.4 Determine start times and accountability

    4.5 Finalize security roadmap and action plan

    4.6 Create communication plan

    5.1 Finalize deliverables

    5.2 Support communication efforts

    5.3 Identify resources in support of priority initiatives

    Deliverables

    1.Security obligations statement

    2.Security scope and boundaries statement

    3.Defined risk tolerance level

    4.Risk assessment and pressure analysis

    1.Information security target state

    2.Security current state assessment

    3.Initiatives to address gaps

    1.Completed security current state assessment

    2.Task list to address gaps address gaps

    4.Prioritization criteria

    1.Information security roadmap

    2.Draft communication deck

    1.Security strategy roadmap documentation

    2.Detailed cost and effort estimates

    3.Mapping of Info-Tech resources against individual initiatives

    Executive Brief Case Study

    Credit Service Company

    Industry: Financial Services

    Source: Info-Tech Research group

    Founded over 100 years ago, Credit Service Company (CSC)* operates in the United States with over 40 branches located across four states. The organization services over 50,000 clients.

    Situation

    Increased regulations, changes in technology, and a growing number of public security incidents had caught the attention of the organization’s leadership. Despite awareness, an IT and security strategy had not been previously created. Management was determined to create a direction for the security team that aligned with their core mission of providing exceptional service and expertise.

    Solution

    During the workshop, the IT team and Info-Tech analysts worked together to understand the organization’s ideal state in various areas of information security. Having a concise understanding of requirements was a stepping stone to beginning to develop CSC’s prioritized strategy.

    Results

    Over the course of the week, the team created a document that concisely prioritized upcoming projects and associated costs and benefits. On the final day of the workshop, the team effectively presented the value of the newly developed security strategy to senior management and received buy-in for the upcoming project.

    *Some details have been changed for client privacy.

    Phase 1

    Assess Security Requirements

      Phase 1

    • 1.1 Define goals & scope
    • 1.2 Assess risks
    • 1.3 Determine pressures
    • 1.4 Determine risk tolerance
    • 1.5 Establish target state

      Phase 2

    • 2.1 Review Info-Tech’s security framework
    • 2.2 Assess your current state
    • 2.3 Identify gap closure actions

      Phase 3

    • 3.1 Define tasks & initiatives
    • 3.2 Perform cost/benefit analysis
    • 3.3 Prioritize initiatives
    • 3.4 Build roadmap

      Phase 4

    • 4.1 Build communication deck
    • 4.2 Develop a security charter
    • 4.3 Execute on your roadmap

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    1.1 Define goals and scope of the security strategy.

    1.2 Assess your organization’s current inherent security risks.

    1.3 Determine your organization’s stakeholder pressures for security.

    1.4 Determine your organization’s risk tolerance.

    1.5 Establish your security target state.

    1.1.1 Record your business goals

    Once you have identified your primary and secondary business goals, as well as the corresponding security alignment goals, record them in the Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool. The tool provides an activity status that will let you know if any parts of the tool have not been completed.

    1. Record your identified primary and secondary business goals in the Goals Cascade tab of the Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool.

    Use the drop-down lists to select an appropriate goal or choose “Other.” If you do choose “Other,” you will need to manually enter an appropriate business goal.

    2. For each of your business goals, select one to two security alignment goals. The tool will provide you with recommendations, but you can override these by selecting a different goal from the drop-down lists.

    A screenshot of the ‘Business Goals Cascade,’ which is part of the ‘Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool.’

    A common challenge for security leaders is how to express their initiatives in terms that are meaningful to business executives. This exercise helps to make an explicit link between what the business cares about and what security is trying to accomplish.

    1.1.2 Review your goals cascade

    Estimated Time: 15 minutes

    1. When you have completed the goals cascade, you can review a graphic diagram that illustrates your goals. The graphic is found on the Results tab of the Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool.
      • Security must support the primary business objectives. A strong security program will enable the business to compete in new and creative ways, rather than simply acting as an obstacle.
      • Failure to meet business obligations can result in operational problems, impacting the organization’s ability to function and the organization’s bottom line.
    2. Once you have reviewed the diagram, copy it into the Information Security Strategy Communication Deck.

    A screenshot of the ‘Goal Cascade Diagrams,’ which is part of the ‘Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool.’

    Identify your compliance obligations

    Most conventional regulatory obligations are legally mandated legislation or compliance obligations, such as:

    Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)

    Applies to public companies that have registered equity or debt securities within the SEC to guarantee data integrity against financial fraud.

    Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS)

    Applies to any organization that processes, transmits, or stores credit card information to ensure cardholder data is protected.

    Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)

    Applies to the healthcare sector and protects the privacy of individually identifiable healthcare information.

    Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH)

    Applies to the healthcare sector and widens the scope of privacy and security protections available under HIPAA.

    Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA)

    Applies to private sector organizations that collect personal information in Canada to ensure the protection of personal information in the course of commercial business.

    Compliance obligations also extend to voluntary security frameworks:

    NIST

    National Institute of Standards and Technology; a non-regulatory agency that develops and publicizes measurement

    CIS – 20 CSC

    Center for Internet Security – 20 Critical Security Controls; foundational set of effective cybersecurity practices.

    ISO 27001

    An information security management system framework outlining policies and procedures.

    COBIT 5

    An information technology and management and governance framework.

    HITRUST

    A common security framework for organizations that use or hold regulated personal health information.

    1.1.3 Record your compliance obligations

    Estimated Time: 30 minutes

    1. Identify your compliance obligations. Most organizations have compliance obligations that must be adhered to. These can include both mandatory and voluntary obligations. Mandatory obligations include:
      • Laws
      • Government regulations
      • Industry standards
      • Contractual agreements
      Voluntary obligations include standards that the organization has chosen to follow for best practices and any obligations that are required to maintain certifications. Organizations will have many different compliance obligations. For the purposes of your security strategy, include only those that have information security or privacy requirements.
    2. Record your compliance obligations, along with any notes, in your copy of the Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool.

    A screenshot of ‘Security Compliance Obligations,’ part of the ‘Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool.’

    Establish your scope and boundaries

    It is important to know at the outset of the strategy: what are we trying to secure?

    This includes physical areas we are responsible for, types of data we care about, and departments or IT systems we are responsible for.

    This also includes what is not in scope. For some outsourced services or locations, you may not be responsible for their security. In some business departments, you may not have control of security processes. Ensure that it is made explicit at the outset what will be included and what will be excluded from security considerations.

    Physical Scope and Boundaries

    • How many offices and locations does your organization have?
    • Which locations/offices will be covered by your information security management system (ISMS)?
    • How sensitive is the data residing at each location?
    • You may have many physical locations, and it is not necessary to list every one. Rather, list exceptional cases that are specifically in or out of scope.

    IT Systems Scope and Boundaries

    • There may be hundreds of applications that are run and maintained in your organization. Some of these may be legacy applications. Does your ISMS need to secure all your programs or a select few?
    • Is the system owned or outsourced?
    • Where are we accountable for security?
    • How sensitive is the data that each system handles?

    Organizational Scope and Boundaries

    • Will your ISMS cover all departments within your organization? For example, do certain departments (e.g. Operations) not need any security coverage?
    • Do you have the ability to make security decisions for each department?
    • Who are the key stakeholders/data owners for each department?

    Organizational scope considerations

    Many different groups will fall within the purview of the security strategy. Consider these two main points when deciding which departments will be in scope:

    1. If a group/user has access to data or systems that can impact the organization, then securing that group/user should be included within scope of the security strategy.
    2. If your organization provides some work direction to a group/user, they should be included within scope of the security strategy.
    1. Identify your departments and business groups
      • Start by identifying departments that provide some essential input or service to the organization or departments that interact with sensitive data.
    2. Break out different subsidiaries or divisions
      • Subsidiaries may or may not be responsible for securing themselves and protecting their data, but either way they are often heavily reliant on corporate for guidance and share IT resourcing support.
    3. Identify user groups
      • Many user groups exist, all requiring different levels of security. For example, from on-premises to remote access, from full-time employees to part-time or contractors.

    Physical scope considerations

    List physical locations by type

    Offices

    The primary location(s) where business operations are carried out. Usually leased or owned by the business.

    Regional Offices

    These are secondary offices that can be normal business offices or home offices. These locations will have a VPN connection and some sort of tenant.

    Co-Locations

    These are redundant data center sites set up for additional space, equipment, and bandwidth.

    Remote Access

    This includes all remaining instances of employees or contractors using a VPN to connect.

    Clients and Vendors

    Various vendors and clients have dedicated VPN connections that will have some control over infrastructure (whether owed/laaS/other).

    List physical locations by nature of the location

    Core areas within physical scope

    These are many physical locations that are directly managed. These are high-risk locations with many personal and services, resulting in many possible vulnerabilities and attack vectors.

    Locations on the edge of control

    These are on the edge of the physical scope, and thus, in scope of the security strategy. These include remote locations, remote access connections, etc.

    Third-party connections

    Networks of third-party users are within physical scope and need defined security requirements and definitions of how this varies per user.

    BYOD

    Mostly privately owned mobile devices with either on-network or remote access.

    It would be overkill and unhelpful to list every single location or device that is in scope. Rather, list by broad categories as suggested above or simply list exceptional cases that are in/out of scope.

    IT systems scope considerations

    Consider identifying your IT systems by your level of control or ownership.

    Fully owned systems

    These are systems that are wholly owned or managed by your organization.

    IT is almost always the admin of these systems. Generally they are hosted on premises. All securitization through methods such as patching or antivirus is done and managed by your IT department.

    Cloud/remote hosted (SaaS)

    These are systems with a lot of uncertainties because the vendor or service provided is either not known or what they are doing for security is not fully known.

    These systems need to be secured regardless, but supplier and vendor relationship management becomes a major component of how to manage these systems. Often, each system has varying levels of risk based on vendor practices.

    Hybrid owned (IaaS/PaaS)

    You likely have a good understanding of control for these systems, but they may not be fully managed by you (i.e. ownership of the infrastructure). These systems are often hosted by third parties that do some level of admin work.

    A main concern is the unclear definition of responsibility in maintaining these systems. These are managed to some degree by third parties; it is challenging for your security program to perform the full gamut of security or administrative functions.

    Unknown/unowned systems

    There are often systems that are unowned and even unknown and that very few people are using. These apps can be very small and my not fall under your IT management system framework. These systems create huge levels of risk due to limited visibility.

    For example, unapproved (shadow IT) file sharing or cloud storage applications would be unknown and unowned.

    1.1.4 Record your scope and boundaries

    Estimated Time: 30-60 minutes

    1. Divide into groups and give each group member a handful of sticky notes. Ask them to write down as many items as possible for the organization that could fall under one of the scope buckets.
    2. Collect each group’s responses and discuss the sticky notes and the rationale for including them. Discuss your security-related locations, data, people, and technologies, and define their scope and boundaries.
      • Careful attention should be paid to any elements of the strategy that are not in scope.
    3. Discuss and aggregate all responses as to what will be in scope of the security strategy and what will not be. Record these in the Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool.

    A screenshot of ‘Scope and Boundaries,’ part of the ‘Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool.’

    1.2 Conduct a risk assessment

    Estimated Time: 1-3 hours

    1. As a group, review the questions on the Risk Assessment tab of the Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool.
    2. Gather the required information from subject matter experts on the following risk elements:
      • Threats
      • Assets
      • Vulnerabilities (people, systems, supply chain)
      • Historical security incidents

    Input

    • List of organizational assets
    • Historical data on information security incidents

    Output

    • Completed risk assessment

    Materials

    • Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • IT Leadership
    • Risk Management

    Download the Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool

    1.2.1 Complete the risk assessment questionnaire

    Estimated Time: 60-90 minutes

    1. Review each question in the questionnaire and provide the most appropriate response using the drop-down list.
      • If you are unsure of the answer, consult with subject matter experts to obtain the required data.
      • Otherwise, provide your best estimation
    2. When providing responses for the historical incident questions, only count incidents that had a sizeable impact on the business.

    A screenshot of the ‘Organizational Security Risk Assessment,’ part of the ‘Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool.’

    Info-Tech Insight

    Understanding your organization’s security risks is critical to identifying the most appropriate level of investment into your security program. Organizations with more security risks will need more a mature security program to mitigate those risks.

    1.2.2 Review the results of the risk assessment

    Estimated Time: 30 minutes

    1. Once you have completed the risk assessment, you can review the output on the Results tab.
    2. If required, the weightings of each of the risk elements can be customized on the Weightings tab.
    3. Once you have reviewed the results, copy your risk assessment diagram into the Information Security Strategy Communication Deck.

    A screenshot showing sample results of the ‘Organizational Risk Assessment,’ part of the ‘Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool.’

    It is important to remember that the assessment measures inherent risk, meaning the risk that exists prior to the implementation of security controls. Your security controls will be assessed later as part of the gap analysis.

    1.3 Conduct pressure analysis

    Estimated Time: 1-2 hours

    1. As a group, review the questions on the Pressure Analysis tab of the Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool.
    2. Gather the required information from subject matter experts on the following pressure elements:
      • Compliance and oversight
      • Customer expectations
      • Business expectations
      • IT expectations

    Input

    • Information on various pressure elements within the organization

    Output

    • Completed pressure analysis

    Materials

    • Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • IT Leadership
    • Business Leaders
    • Compliance

    Download the Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool

    Risk tolerance considerations

    At this point, we want to frame risk tolerance in terms of business impact. Meaning, what kinds of impacts to the business would we be able to tolerate and how often? This will empower future risk decisions by allowing the impact of a potential event to be assessed, then compared against the formalized tolerance. We will consider impact from three perspectives:

    F

    Functional Impact

    The disruption or degradation of business/organizational processes.

    I

    Informational Impact

    The breach of confidentiality, privacy, or integrity of data/information.

    R

    Recoverability Impact

    The disruption or degradation of the ability to return to conditions prior to a security incident.

    Consider these questions:

    Questions to ask

    Description

    Is there a hard-dollar impact from downtime?

    This refers to when revenue or profits are directly impacted by a business disruption. For example, when an online ordering system is compromised and shut down, it affects sales, and therefore, revenue.

    Is regulatory compliance a factor?

    Depending on the circumstances of the vulnerabilities, it can be a violation of compliance obligations that would cause significant fines.

    Are any critical services dependent on this asset?

    Functional dependencies are sometimes not obvious, and assets that appear marginal can have huge impacts on critical services.

    Is there a health or safety risk?

    Some operations are critical to health and safety. For example, medical organizations have operations that are necessary to ensure uninterrupted critical health services. An exploited vulnerability that impacts these operations can have life and death consequences.

    ANALYST PERSPECTIVE

    It is crucial to keep in mind that you care about a risk scenario impact to the main business processes.

    For example, imagine a complete functional loss of the corporate printers. For most businesses, even the most catastrophic loss of printer function will have a small impact on their ability to carry out the main business functions.

    On the flip side, even a small interruption to email or servers could have a large functional impact on business processes.

    Risk tolerance descriptions

    High

    • Organizations with high risk tolerances are often found in industries with limited security risk, such as Construction, Agriculture and Fishing, or Mining.
    • A high risk tolerance may be appropriate for organizations that do not rely on highly sensitive data, have limited compliance obligations, and where their customers do not demand strong security controls. Organizations that are highly focused on innovation and rapid growth may also tend towards a higher risk tolerance.
    • However, many organizations adopt a high risk tolerance by default simply because they have not adequately assessed their risks.

    Moderate

    • Organizations with medium risk tolerances are often found in industries with moderate levels of security risk, such as Local Government, Education, or Retail and Wholesale
    • A medium risk tolerance may be appropriate for organizations that store and process some sensitive data, have a modest number of compliance obligations, and where customer expectations for security tend to be implicit rather than explicit.

    Low

    • Organizations with low risk tolerances are often found in industries with elevated security risk, such as Financial Services, Federal Governments, or Defense Contractors.
    • A low risk tolerance may be appropriate for organizations that store very sensitive data, process high-value financial transactions, are highly regulated, and where customers demand strong security controls.
    • Some organizations claim to have a low risk tolerance, but in practice will often allow business units or IT to accept more security risk than would otherwise be permissible. A strong information security program will be required to manage risks to an acceptable level.

    1.4.1 Complete the risk tolerance questionnaire

    Estimated Time: 30-60 minutes

    1. In a group discussion, review the low-, medium-, and high-impact scenarios and examples for each impact category. Ensure that everyone has a consistent understanding of the scenarios.
    2. For each impact type, use the frequency drop-down list to identify the maximum frequency that the organization could tolerate for the event scenarios, considering:
      • The current frequency with which the scenarios are occurring in your organization may be a good indication of your tolerance. However, keep in mind that you may be able to tolerate these incidents happening more frequently than they do.
      • Hoping is not the same as tolerating. While everyone hopes that high-impact incidents never occur, carefully consider whether you could tolerate them occurring more frequently.

    A screenshot showing the ‘Organizational Security Risk Tolerance Assessment,’ part of the ‘Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool.’

    1.4.2 Review the results of the risk tolerance analysis

    Estimated Time: 30 minutes

    1. Once you have completed the risk tolerance exercise, you can review the output on the Results tab.
    2. If required, the weightings of each of the impact types can be customized on the Weightings tab.
    3. Once you have reviewed the results, copy your risk tolerance diagram into the Information Security Strategy Communication Deck.

    A screenshot showing the results of the 'Information Security Risk Tolerance Assessment,' part of the ‘Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool.’

    A low risk tolerance will require a stronger information security program to ensure that operational security risk in the organization is minimized. If this tool reports that your risk tolerance is low, it is recommended that you review the results with your senior stakeholders to ensure agreement and support for the security program.

    1.5 Establish your target state

    Estimated Time: 30-60 minutes

    1. As a group, review the overall results of the requirements gathering exercise:
      • Business goals cascade
      • Compliance obligations
      • Scope
    2. Review the overall results of the risk assessment, pressure analysis, and risk tolerance exercises.
    3. Conduct a group discussion to arrive at a consensus of what the ideal target state for the information security program should look like.
      • Developing mission and vision statements for security may be useful for focusing the group.
      • This discussion should also consider the desired time frame for achieving the target state.

    Download the Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool

    Input

    • Information security requirements (goals cascade, compliance obligations, scope)
    • Risk assessment
    • Pressure analysis
    • Risk tolerance

    Output

    • Completed information security target state

    Materials

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • IT Leadership
    • Risk Management
    • Business Leaders
    • Compliance

    Understanding security target states

    Maturity models are very effective for determining information security target states. This table provides general descriptions for each maturity level. As a group, consider which description most accurately reflects the ideal target state for information security in your organization.

    1. AD HOC

      Initial/Ad hoc security programs are reactive. Lacking strategic vision, these programs are less effective and less responsive to the needs of the business.
    2. DEVELOPING

      Developing security programs can be effective at what they do but are not holistic. Governance is largely absent. These programs tend to rely on the talents of individuals rather than a cohesive plan.
    3. DEFINED

      A defined security program is holistic, documented, and proactive. At least some governance is in place, however, metrics are often rudimentary and operational in nature. These programs still often rely on best practices rather than strong risk management.
    4. MANAGED

      Managed security programs have robust governance and metrics processes. Management and board-level metrics for the overall program are produced. These are reviewed by business leaders and drive security decisions. More mature risk management practices take the place of best practices.
    5. OPTIMIZED

      An optimized security program is based on strong risk management practices, including the production of key risk indicators (KRIs). Individual security services are optimized using key performance indicators (KPIs) that continually measure service effectiveness and efficiency.

    1.5.1 Review the results of the target state recommendation

    Estimated Time: 30-60 minutes

    1. Based upon your risk assessment, pressure analysis, and risk tolerance, the Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool will provide a recommended information security target state.
    2. With your group, review the recommendation against your expectations.
    3. If required, the weightings of each of the factors can be customized on the Weightings tab.
    4. Once you have reviewed the results, copy your target state diagram into the Information Security Strategy Communication Deck.

    A screenshot showing the results of the ‘Information Security Target State,’ part of the ‘Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool.’

    Info-Tech Insight

    Higher target states require more investment to attain. It is critical to ensure that all key stakeholders agree on the security target state. If you set a target state that aims too high, you may struggle to gain support and funding for the strategy. Taking this opportunity to ensure alignment from the start will pay off dividends in future.

    1.5.2 Review and adjust risk and pressure weightings

    Estimated Time: 30 minutes

    1. If the results of your risk assessment, pressure analysis, risk tolerance, or target state do not match your expectations, you may need to review and adjust the weightings for the elements within one or more of these areas.
    2. On the Weightings tab, review each of the strategic categories and adjust the weights as required.
      • Each domain is weighted to contribute to your overall pressure score based on the perceived importance of the domain to the organization.
      • The sum of all weights for each category must add up to 100%.

    A screenshot showing the results of the weightings given to each factor in a category, part of the ‘Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool.’

    Case Study

    Credit Service Company

    Industry: Financial Services

    Source: Info-Tech Research group

    Below are some of the primary requirements that influenced CSC’s initial strategy development.

    External Pressure

    Pressure Level: High

    • Highly regulated industries, such as Finance, experience high external pressure.
    • Security pressure was anticipated to increase over the following three years due to an increase in customer requirement.

    Obligations

    Regulatory: Numerous regulations and compliance requirements as a financial institution (PCI, FFIEC guidance).

    Customer: Implicitly assumes personal, financial, and health information will be kept secure.

    Risk Tolerance

    Tolerance Level: Low

    1. Management: Are risk averse and have high visibility into information security.
    2. Multiple locations controlled by a central IT department decreased the organization’s risk tolerance.

    Summary of Security Requirements

    Define and implement dynamic information security program that understands and addresses the business’ inherent pressure, requirements (business, regulatory, and customer), and risk tolerance.

    Phase 2

    Build a Gap Initiative Strategy

      Phase 1

    • 1.1 Define goals & scope
    • 1.2 Assess risks
    • 1.3 Determine pressures
    • 1.4 Determine risk tolerance
    • 1.5 Establish target state

      Phase 2

    • 2.1 Review Info-Tech’s security framework
    • 2.2 Assess your current state
    • 2.3 Identify gap closure actions

      Phase 3

    • 3.1 Define tasks & initiatives
    • 3.2 Perform cost/benefit analysis
    • 3.3 Prioritize initiatives
    • 3.4 Build roadmap

      Phase 4

    • 4.1 Build communication deck
    • 4.2 Develop a security charter
    • 4.3 Execute on your roadmap

      This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • 2.1 Review Info-Tech’s framework.
    • 2.2 Assess your current state of security against your target state.
    • 2.3 Identify actions required to close gaps.

    2.1 Review the Info-Tech framework

    Estimated Time: 30-60 minutes

    1. As a group, have the security team review the security framework within the Information Security Gap Analysis Tool.
    2. Customize the tool as required using the instructions on the following slides.

    Input

    • Information security requirements
    • Security target state

    Output

    • Customized security framework

    Materials

    • Information Security Gap Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • Security Team

    Download the Information Security Gap Analysis Tool

    Understand the Info-Tech framework

    Info-Tech’s security framework uses a best-of-breed approach to leverage and align with most major security standards, including:

    • ISO 27001/27002
    • COBIT
    • Center for Internet Security (CIS) Critical Controls
    • NIST Cybersecurity Framework
    • NIST SP 800-53
    • NIST SP 800-171

    A diagram depicting Info-Tech’s best-of-breed security framework.

    A best-of-breed approach ensures holistic coverage of your information security program while refraining from locking you in to a specific compliance standard.

    2.1.1 Configure the Information Security Gap Analysis Tool

    Estimated Time: 30 minutes

    Review the Setup tab of the Information Security Gap Analysis Tool. This tab contains several configurable settings that should be customized to your organization. For now, the three settings you will need to modify are:

    • The security target state. Enter the target state from your Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool. If you do not enter a target state, the tool will default to a target of 3 (Defined).
    • Your Security Alignment Goals (from your Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool).
    • The starting year for your security roadmap.

    A screenshot showing the ‘Setup’ tab of the ‘Information Security Gap Analysis Tool.’

    2.2 Assess current state of security

    Estimated Time: 8-16 hours

    1. Using the Information Security Gap Analysis Tool, review each of the controls in the Gap Analysis tab.
    2. Follow the instructions on the next slides to complete your current state and target state assessment.
    3. For most organizations, multiple internal subject matter experts will need to be consulted to complete the assessment.

    Input

    • Security target state
    • Information on current state of security controls, including sources such as audit findings, vulnerability and penetration test results, and risk registers

    Output

    • Gap analysis

    Materials

    • Information Security Gap Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • Subject Matter Experts From IT, HR, Legal, Facilities, Compliance, Audit, Risk Management

    Download the Information Security Gap Analysis Tool

    Example maturity levels

    To help determine appropriate current and target maturity levels, refer to the example below for the control “Email communication is filtered for spam and potential malicious communications.”

    AD HOC 01

    There is no centrally managed spam filter. Spam may be filtered by endpoint email clients.

    DEVELOPING 02

    There is a secure email gateway. However, the processes for managing it are not documented. Administrator roles are not well defined. Minimal fine-tuning is performed, and only basic features are in use.

    DEFINED 03

    There is a policy and documented process for email security. Roles are assigned and administrators have adequate technical training. Most of the features of the solution are being used. Rudimentary reports are generated, and some fine-tuning is performed.

    MANAGED 04

    Metrics are produced to measure the effectiveness of the email security service. Advanced technical features of the solution have been implemented and are regularly fine-tuned based on the metrics.

    OPTIMIZED 05

    There is a dedicated email security administrator with advanced technical training. Custom filters are developed to further enhance security, based on relevant cyber threat intelligence. Email security metrics feed key risk indicators that are reported to senior management.

    2.2.1 Conduct current state assessment

    Estimated Time: 8-16 hours

    1. Carefully review each of the controls in the Gap Analysis tab. For each control, indicate the current maturity level using the drop-down list.
      • You should only use “N/A” if you are confident that the control is not required in your organization.
      • For example, if your organization does not perform any software development then you can select “N/A” for any controls related to secure coding practices.
    2. Provide comments to describe your current state. This step is optional but recommended as it may be important to record this information for future reference.
    3. Select the target maturity for the control. The tool will default to the target state for your security program, but this can be overridden using the drop-down list.

    2.2.1 Conduct current state assessment

    Estimated Time: 8-16 hours

    1. Carefully review each of the controls in the Gap Analysis tab. For each control, indicate the current maturity level using the drop-down list.
      • You should only use “N/A” if you are confident that the control is not required in your organization. For example, if your organization does not perform any software development then you can select “N/A” for any controls related to secure coding practices.
    2. Provide comments to describe your current state. This step is optional but recommended as it may be important to record this information for future reference.
    3. Select the target maturity for the control. The tool will default to the target state for your security program, but this can be overridden using the drop-down list.

    A screenshot showing the 'Gap Analysis' tab of the 'Information Security Gap Analysis Tool.'

    Review the Gap Analysis Dashboard

    Use the Gap Assessment Dashboard to map your progress. As you fill out the Gap Analysis Tool, check with the Dashboard to see the difference between your current and target state.

    Use the color-coded legend to see how large the gap between your current and target state is. The legend can be customized further if desired.

    Security domains that appear white have not yet been assessed or are rated as “N/A.”

    2.2.3 Identify actions required to close gaps

    Estimated Time: 4-8 hours

    1. Using the Information Security Gap Analysis Tool, review each of the controls in the Gap Analysis tab.
    2. Follow the instructions on the next slides to identify gap closure actions for each control that requires improvement.
    3. For most organizations, multiple internal subject matter experts will need to be consulted to complete the assessment.

    Input

    • Security control gap information

    Output

    • Gap closure action list

    Materials

    • Information Security Gap Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • Subject Matter Experts From IT, HR, Legal, Facilities, Compliance, Audit, Risk Management

    Download the Information Security Gap Analysis Tool

    2.3.1 Identify gap closure actions

    Estimated Time: 4-8 hours

    1. For each of the controls where there is a gap between the current and target state, a gap closure action should be identified:
      • Review the example actions and copy one or more of them if appropriate. Otherwise, enter your own gap closure action.
    2. Identify whether the action should be managed as a task or as an initiative. Most actions should be categorized as an initiative. However, it may be more appropriate to categorize them as a task when:
      1. They have no costs associated with them
      2. They require a low amount of initial effort to implement and no ongoing effort to maintain
      3. They can be accomplished independently of other tasks

    A screenshot showing gap closure actions, part of the 'Gap Analysis' tab of the 'Information Security Gap Analysis Tool.'

    Considerations for gap closure actions

    • In small groups, have participants ask, “what would we have to do to achieve the target state?” Document these in the Gap Closure Actions column.
    • The example gap closure actions may be appropriate for your organization, but do not simply copy them without considering whether they are right for you.
    • Not all gaps will require their own action. You can enter one action that may address multiple gaps.
    • If you find that many of your actions are along the lines of “investigate and make recommendations,” you should consider using the estimated gap closure percentage column to track the fact that these gaps will not be fully closed by the actions.

    A screenshot showing considerations for gap closure actions, part of the 'Gap Analysis' tab of the 'Information Security Gap Analysis Tool.'

    2.3.2 Define gap closure action effectiveness

    Estimated Time: 1-2 hours

    For each of the gap closure actions, optionally enter an estimated gap closure percentage to indicate how effective the action will be in fully closing the gap.

    • For instance, an action to “investigate solutions and make recommendations” will not fully close the gap.
    • This is an optional step but will be helpful to understand how much progress towards your security target state you will make based on your roadmap.
    • If you do not fill in this column, the tool will assume that your actions will fully close all gaps.

    A screenshot showing considerations for estimated gap closure percentage, part of the 'Gap Analysis' tab of the 'Information Security Gap Analysis Tool.'

    Completing this step will populate the “Security Roadmap Progression” diagram in the Results tab, which will provide a graphic illustration of how close to your target state you will get based upon the roadmap.

    Phase 3

    Prioritize Initiatives and Build Roadmap

    Phase 1

    • 1.1 Define goals & scope
    • 1.2 Assess risks
    • 1.3 Determine pressures
    • 1.4 Determine risk tolerance
    • 1.5 Establish target state

    Phase 2

    • 2.1 Review Info-Tech’s security framework
    • 2.2 Assess your current state
    • 2.3 Identify gap closure actions

    Phase 3

    • 3.1 Define tasks & initiatives
    • 3.2 Perform cost/benefit analysis
    • 3.3 Prioritize initiatives
    • 3.4 Build roadmap

    Phase 4

    • 4.1 Build communication deck
    • 4.2 Develop a security charter
    • 4.3 Execute on your roadmap

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • 3.1 Define tasks and initiatives.
    • 3.2 Define cost, effort, alignment, and security benefit of each initiative.
    • 3.3 Prioritize initiatives.
    • 3.4 Build the prioritized security roadmap

    3.1 Define tasks and initiatives

    Estimated Time: 2-4 hours

    1. As a group, review the gap actions identified in the Gap Analysis tab.
    2. Using the instructions on the following slides, finalize your task list.
    3. Using the instructions on the following slides, review and consolidate your initiative list.

    Input

    • Gap analysis

    Output

    • List of tasks and initiatives

    Materials

    • Information Security Gap Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • Subject Matter Experts From IT, HR, Legal, Facilities, Compliance, Audit, Risk Management
    • Project Management Office

    Download the Information Security Gap Analysis Tool

    3.1.1 Finalize your task list

    Estimated Time: 1-2 hours

    1. Obtain a list of all your task actions by filtering on the Action Type column in the Gap Analysis tab.
    2. Paste the list into the table on the Task List tab.
      • Use Paste Values to retain the table formatting
    3. Enter a task owner and due date for each task. Without accountability, it is too easy to fall into complacency and neglect these tasks.

    A screenshot showing the 'Task List' tab of the 'Information Security Gap Analysis Tool.'

    Info-Tech Insight

    Tasks are not meant to be managed to the same degree that initiatives will be. However, they are still important. It is recommended that you develop a process for tracking these tasks to completion.

    3.1.2 Consolidate your gap closure actions into initiatives

    Estimated Time: 2-3 hours

    1. Once you have finalized your task list, you will need to consolidate your list of initiative actions. Obtain a list of all your initiative actions by filtering on the Action Type column in the Gap Analysis tab.
    2. Create initiatives on the Initiative List tab. While creating initiatives, consider the following:
      • As much as possible, it is recommended that you consolidate multiple actions into a single initiative. Reducing the total number of initiatives will allow for more efficient management of the overall roadmap.
      • Start by identifying areas of commonality between gap closure actions, for instance:
        • Group all actions within a security domain into a single initiative.
        • Group together similar actions, such as all actions that require updating policies.
        • Consider combining actions that have inter-dependencies.
      • While it is recommended that you consolidate actions as much as possible, some actions should become initiatives on their own. This will be appropriate when:
        • The action is time sensitive and consolidating it with other actions will cause scheduling issues.
        • Actions that could otherwise be consolidated have different business sponsors or owners and need to be kept separate for funding or accountability reasons.
    3. Link the initiative actions on the Gap Analysis tab using the drop-down list in the Initiative Name column.

    Initiative consolidation example

    In the example below, we see three gap closure actions within the Security Culture and Awareness domain being consolidated into a single initiative “Develop security awareness program.”

    We can also see one gap closure action within the same domain being grouped with two actions from the Security Policies domain into another initiative “Update security policies.”

    Info-Tech Insight

    As you go through this exercise, you may find that some actions that you previously categorized as tasks could be consolidated into an initiative.

    A screenshot showing how six sample gap closure actions can be distilled into two gap closure initiatives. Part of the 'Information Security Gap Analysis Tool.'

    3.1.3 Finalize your initiative list

    Estimated Time: 30 minutes

    1. Review your final list of initiatives and make any required updates.
    2. Optionally, add a description or paste in a list of the individual gap closure actions that are associated with the initiative. This will make it easier to perform the cost and benefit analysis.
    3. Use the drop-down list to indicate which of the security alignment goals most appropriately reflects the objectives of the initiative. If you are unsure, use the legend next to the table to find the primary security domain associated with the initiative and then select the recommended security alignment goal.
      • This step is important to understand how the initiative supports the business goals identified earlier.

     A screenshot showing the primary security alignment goal, part of the 'Initiative List' tab of the 'Information Security Gap Analysis Tool.'

    3.2 Conduct cost/ benefit analysis

    Estimated Time: 1-2 hours

    1. As a group, define the criteria to be used to conduct the cost/benefit analysis, following the instructions on the next slide.
    2. Assign costing and benefits information for each initiative.
    3. Define dependencies or business impacts if they will help with prioritization.

    Input

    • Gap analysis
    • Initiative list

    Output

    • Completed cost/benefit analysis for initiative list

    Materials

    • Information Security Gap Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • Subject Matter Experts From IT, HR, Legal, Facilities, Compliance, Audit, Risk Management
    • Project Management Office

    Download the Information Security Gap Analysis Tool

    3.2.1 Define costing criteria

    Estimated Time: 30 minutes

    1. On the Setup tab of the Information Security Gap Analysis Tool, enter high, medium, and low ranges for initial and ongoing costs and efforts.
      1. Initial costs are one-time, upfront capital investments (e.g. hardware and software costs, project-based consulting fees, training).
      2. Ongoing cost is any annually recurring operating expenses that are new budgetary costs (e.g. licensing, maintenance, subscription fees).
      3. Initial staffing in hours is total time in person hours required to complete a project. It is not total elapsed time but dedicated time. Consider time required to gather requirements and to design, test, and implement the solution.
      4. Ongoing staffing in FTEs is the ongoing average effort required to support that initiative after implementation.
    2. In addition to ranges, provide an average for each. These will be used to calculate estimated total costs for the roadmap.

    A screenshot showing the initiative costs for estimation, part of the 'Setup' tab of the 'Information Security Gap Analysis Tool.' The range of costs is labeled with an arrow with number 1 on it, and the average cost per initiative is labeled with an arrow with number 2 on it.

    Make sure that your ranges allow for differentiation between initiatives to enable prioritization. For instance, if you set your ranges too low, all your initiatives will be assessed as high cost, providing no help when you must prioritize them.

    3.2.2 Define benefits criteria

    Estimated Time: 30 minutes

    1. On the Setup tab of the Information Security Gap Analysis Tool, enter high, medium, and low values for the Alignment with Business Benefit.
      • This variable is meant to capture how well each initiative aligns with organizational goals and objectives.
      • By default, this benefit is linked directly to business goals through the primary and secondary security alignment goals. This allows the tool to automatically calculate the benefit based on the security alignment goals associated with each initiative.
      • If you change these values, you may need to override the calculated values in the prioritization tab.
    2. Enter a high, medium, and low value for the Security Benefit.
      • This variable is meant to capture the relative security benefit or risk reduction being provided by the gap initiative.
      • By default, this benefit is linked to security risk reduction.

    A screenshot showing the initiative benefits for estimation, part of the 'Setup' tab of the 'Information Security Gap Analysis Tool.'

    Some organizations prefer to use the “Security Benefit” criteria to demonstrate how well each initiative supports specific compliance goals.

    3.2.3 Complete the cost/benefit analysis

    Estimated Time: 1-2 hours

    1. On the Prioritization tab, use the drop-down lists to enter the estimated costs and efforts for each initiative, using the criteria defined earlier.
      • If you have actual costs available, you can optionally enter them under the Detailed Cost Estimates columns.
    2. Enter the estimated benefits, also using the criteria defined earlier.
      • The Alignment with Business benefit will be automatically populated, but you can override this value using the drop-down list if desired.

    A screenshot showing the estimated cost, estimated effort, and estimated benefits section, part of the 'Prioritization' tab of the 'Information Security Gap Analysis Tool.' Estimated cost and estimated effort are labeled with an arrow with number 1 on it, and estimated benefits is labeled with an arrow with a number 2 on it.

    3.2.4 Optionally enter detailed cost estimates

    Estimated Time: 30 minutes

    1. For each initiative, the tool will automatically populate the Detailed Cost Estimates and Detailed Staffing Estimates columns using the averages that you provided in steps 3.2.1 and 3.2.2. However, if you have more detailed data about the costs and effort requirements for an initiative, you can override the calculated data by manually entering it into these columns. For example:
      • You are planning to subscribe to a security awareness vendor, and you have a quote from them specifying that the initial cost will be $75,000.
      • You have defined your “Medium” cost range as being “$10-100K”, so you select medium as your initial cost for this initiative in step 3.2.3. As you defined the average for medium costs as being $50,000, this is what the tool will put into the detailed cost estimate.
      • You can override this average by entering $75,000 as the initial cost in the detailed cost estimate column.

    A screenshot showing the detailed cost estimates and detailed staffing estimates columns, part of the 'Prioritization' tab of the 'Information Security Gap Analysis Tool.' These columns are labeled with an arrow with a number 1 on it.

    Case Study

    Credit Service Company

    Industry: Financial Services

    Source: Info-Tech Research Group

    A chart titled 'Framework Components,' displaying how the Credit Service Company profiled in the case study performed a current state assessment, created gap initiatives, and prioritized gap initiatives.

    3.3 Prioritize initiatives

    Estimated Time: 2-3 hours

    1. As a group, review the results of the cost/benefit analysis. Optionally, complete the Other Considerations columns in the Prioritization tab:
      • Dependencies can refer to other initiatives on the list or any other dependency that relates to activities or projects within the organization.
      • Business impacts can be helpful to document as they may require additional planning and communication that could impact initiative timelines.
    2. Follow step 3.3.1 to create an effort map with the results of the cost/benefit analysis.
    3. Follow step 3.3.2 to assign initiatives into execution waves.

    Input

    • Gap analysis
    • Initiative list
    • Cost/benefit analysis

    Output

    • Prioritized list of initiatives

    Materials

    • Information Security Gap Analysis Tool
    • Whiteboard

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • IT Leadership
    • Project Management Office

    Download the Information Security Gap Analysis Tool

    3.3.1 Create effort map

    Estimated Time: 30 minutes

    1. On a whiteboard, draw the quadrant diagram shown.
    2. Create sticky notes for each initiative on your initiative list.
    3. For each initiative, use the “Cost/Effort Rating” and the “Benefit Rating” calculated on the Prioritization tab to place the corresponding sticky note onto the diagram.

    An effort map is a tool used for the visualization of a cost/benefit analysis. It is a quadrant output that visually shows how your gap initiatives were prioritized. In this example, the initiative “Update Security Policies” was assessed as low cost/effort (3) and high benefit (10).

    An image showing how 'update security policies,' as ranked on a cost/effort and benefit quadrant, translates to a cost/effort and benefit rating on the 'Prioritization' tab of the 'Information Security Gap Analysis Tool.'

    3.3.2 Assign initiatives to execution waves

    Estimated Time: 60 minutes

    1. Using sticky flip chart sheets, create four sheets and label them according to the four execution waves:
      • MUST DO – These are initiatives that need to get moving right away. They may be quick wins, items with critical importance, or foundational projects upon which many other initiatives depend.
      • SHOULD DO – These are important initiatives that need to get done but cannot launch immediately due to budget constraints, dependencies, or business impacts that require preparation.
      • COULD DO – Initiatives that have merit but are not a priority.
      • WON’T DO – Initiatives where the costs outweigh the benefits.
    2. Using the further instructions on the following slides, move the initiative sticky notes from your effort map into the waves.

    Considerations for prioritization

    • Starting from the top right of the effort map, begin pulling stickies off and putting them in the appropriate roadmap category.
    • Keep dependencies in mind. If an important initiative depends on a low-priority one being completed first, then pull dependent initiatives up the list.
    • It may be helpful to think of each wave as representing a specific time frame (e.g. wave 1 = first year of your roadmap, wave 2 = year two, wave 3 = year three).

    Info-Tech Insight

    Use an iterative approach. Most organizations tend to put too many initiatives into wave 1. Be realistic about what you can accomplish and take several passes at the exercise to achieve a balance.

    An image showing how to map the sticky notes from a sample exercise, as placed on a cost/effort and benefit quadrant, into waves.

    3.3.3 Finalize prioritization

    Estimated Time: 30 minutes

    1. Once you have completed placing your initiative sticky notes into the waves, update the Prioritization tab with the Roadmap Wave column.
    2. Optionally, use the Roadmap Sub-Wave column to prioritize initiatives within a single wave.
      • This will allow you more granular control over the final prioritization, especially where dependencies require extra granularity.

    Any initiatives that are currently in progress should be assigned to Wave 0.

    An image showing the roadmap wave and roadmap sub-wave sections, part of the 'Prioritization' tab of the 'Information Security Gap Analysis Tool.' Roadmap wave is labeled with an arrow with a number 1 on it, and roadmap sub-wave is labeled with an arrow with a number 2 on it.

    3.4 Build roadmap

    Estimated Time: 1-3 hours

    1. As a group, follow step 3.4.1 to create your roadmap by scheduling initiatives into the Gantt chart within the Information Security Gap Analysis Tool.
    2. Review the roadmap for resourcing conflicts and adjust as required.
    3. Review the final cost and effort estimates for the roadmap.

    Input

    • Gap analysis
    • Cost/benefit analysis
    • Prioritized initiative list
    • (Optional) List of other non-security IT and business projects

    Output

    • Security strategic roadmap

    Materials

    • Information Security Gap Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • IT Leadership
    • Project Management Office

    Download the Information Security Gap Analysis Tool

    3.4.1 Schedule initiatives using the Gantt chart

    Estimated Time: 1-2 Hours

    1. On the Gantt Chart tab for each initiative, enter an owner (the individual who will be primarily responsible for execution).
    2. Additionally, enter a start month and year for the initiative and the expected duration in months.
      • You can filter the Wave column to only see specific waves at any one time to assist with the scheduling.
      • You do not need to schedule Wave 4 initiatives as the expectation is that these initiatives will not be done.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Use the Owner column to help identify resourcing constraints. If a single individual is responsible for many different initiatives that are planned to start at the same time, consider staggering those initiatives.

    An image showing the owner and planned start sections, part of the 'Security Roadmap Gantt Chart' tab of the 'Information Security Gap Analysis Tool.' The owner column is labeled with an arrow with a 1 on it, and the planned start column is labeled with an arrow with a 2 on it.

    3.4.2 Review your roadmap

    Estimated Time: 30-60 minutes

    1. When you have completed the Gantt chart, as a group review the overall roadmap to ensure that it is reasonable for your organization. Consider the following:
      • Do you have other IT or business projects planned during this time frame that may impact your resourcing or scheduling?
      • Does your organization have regular change freezes throughout the year that will impact the schedule?
      • Do you have over-subscribed resources? You can filter the list on the Owner column to identify potential over-subscription of resources.
      • Have you considered any long vacations, sabbaticals, parental leaves, or other planned longer-term absences?
      • Are your initiatives adequately aligned to your budget cycle? For instance, if you have an initiative that is expected to make recommendations for capital expenditure, it must be completed prior to budget planning.

    A screenshot image showing parts of the 'Security Roadmap Gantt Chart' tab with sample data in it. Taken from the 'Information Security Gap Analysis Tool.'

    3.4.3 Review your expected roadmap progression

    Estimated Time: 30 minutes

    1. If you complete the optional exercise of filling in the Estimated Gap Closure Percentage column on the Gap Analysis tab, the tool will generate a diagram showing how close to your target state you can expect to get based on the tasks and initiatives in your roadmap. You can review this diagram on the Results tab.
      • Remember that this Expected Maturity at End of Roadmap score assumes that you will complete all tasks and initiatives (including all Wave 4 initiatives).
    2. Copy the diagram into the Information Security Strategy Communication Deck.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Often, internal stakeholders will ask the question “If we do everything on this roadmap, will we be at our target state?” This diagram will help answer that question.

    A screenshot image showing the 'Expected Security Roadmap Progression' with sample data in it. Part of the 'Results' tab of the 'Information Security Gap Analysis Tool.'

    3.4.4 Review your cost/effort estimates table

    Estimated Time: 30 minutes

    1. Once you have completed your roadmap, review the total cost/effort estimates. This can be found in a table on the Results tab. This table will provide initial and ongoing costs and staffing requirements for each wave. This also includes the total three-year investment. In your review consider:
      • Is this investment realistic? Will completion of your roadmap require adding more staff or funding than you otherwise expected?
      • If the investment seems unrealistic, you may need to revisit some of your assumptions, potentially reducing target levels or increasing the amount of time to complete the strategy.
      • This table provides you with the information to have important conversations with management and stakeholders
    2. When you have completed your review, copy the table into the Information Security Strategy Communication Deck.

    A screenshot image showing the 'Information Security Roadmap Cost/Effort Estimates,' part of the 'Results' tab of the 'Information Security Gap Analysis Tool.'

    Phase 4

    Execute and Maintain

    Phase 1

    • 1.1 Define goals & scope
    • 1.2 Assess risks
    • 1.3 Determine pressures
    • 1.4 Determine risk tolerance
    • 1.5 Establish target state

    Phase 2

    • 2.1 Review Info-Tech’s security framework
    • 2.2 Assess your current state
    • 2.3 Identify gap closure actions

    Phase 3

    • 3.1 Define tasks & initiatives
    • 3.2 Perform cost/benefit analysis
    • 3.3 Prioritize initiatives
    • 3.4 Build roadmap

    Phase 4

    • 4.1 Build communication deck
    • 4.2 Develop a security charter
    • 4.3 Execute on your roadmap

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • 4.1 Build your security strategy communication deck.
    • 4.2 Develop a security charter.
    • 4.3 Execute on your roadmap.

    4.1 Build your communication deck

    Estimated Time: 1-3 hours

    1. As a group, review the Information Security Strategy Communication Deck.
    2. Follow the instructions within the template and on the next few slides to customize the template with the results of your strategic roadmap planning.

    Input

    • Completed Security Requirements Gathering Tool
    • Completed Security Pressure Analysis Tool
    • Completed Security Gap Analysis Tool

    Output

    • Information Security Strategy Communication Deck

    Materials

    • Information Security Strategy Communication Deck

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • IT Leadership

    Download the Information Security Gap Analysis Tool

    4.1.1 Customize the Communication Deck

    Estimated Time: 1-2 hours

    1. When reviewing the Information Security Strategy Communication Deck, you will find slides that contain instructions within green text boxes. Follow the instructions within the boxes, then delete the boxes.
      • Most slides only require that you copy and paste screenshots or tables from your tools into the slides.
      • However, some slides require that you customize or add text explanations that need to reflect your unique organization.
      • It is recommended that you pay attention to the Next Steps slide at the end of the deck. This will likely have a large impact on your audience.
    2. Once you have customized the existing slides, you may wish to add additional slides. For instance, you may wish to add more context to the risk assessment or pressure analysis diagrams or provide details on high-priority initiatives.

    An image showing the 'Business Goals Cascade,' part of the 'Information Security Strategy Communication Deck.' A green box on top of the screenshot instructs you to 'Paste your goals cascade from the Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool here.'

    Consider developing multiple versions of the deck for different audiences. Senior management may only want an executive summary, whereas the CIO may be more interested in the methodology used to develop the strategy.

    Communication considerations

    Developing an information security strategy is only half the job. For the strategy to be successful, you will need to garner support from key internal stakeholders. These may include the CIO, senior executives, and business leaders. Without their support, your strategy may never get the traction it needs. When building your communication deck and planning to present to these stakeholders, consider the following:

    • Gaining support from stakeholders requires understanding their needs. Before presenting to a new audience, carefully consider their priorities and tailor your presentation to address them.
    • Use the communication deck to clarify the business context and how your initiatives that will support business goals.
    • When presenting to senior stakeholders, anticipate what questions they might ask and be sure to prepare answers in advance. Always be prepared to speak to any data point within the deck.
    • If you are going to present your strategy to a group and you anticipate that one or more members of that group may be antagonistic, seek out an opportunity to speak to them before the meeting and address their concerns one on one.

    If you have already fully engaged your key stakeholders through the requirements gathering exercises, presenting the strategy will be significantly easier. The stakeholders will have already bought in to the business goals, allowing you to show how the security strategy supports those goals.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Reinforce the concept that a security strategy is an effort to enable the organization to achieve its core mission and goals and to protect the business only to the degree that the business demands. It is important that stakeholders understand this point.

    4.2 Develop a security charter

    Estimated Time: 1-3 hours

    1. As a group, review the Information Security Charter.
    2. Customize the template as required to reflect your information security program. It may include elements such as:
      • A mission and vision statement for information security in your organization
      • The objectives and scope of the security program
      • A description of the security principles upon which your program is built
      • High-level roles and responsibilities for information security within the organization

    Input

    • Completed Security Requirements Gathering Tool
    • Completed Security Pressure Analysis Tool
    • Completed Security Gap Analysis Tool

    Output

    • Information security charter

    Materials

    • Information Security Charter

    Participants

    • Security Team

    Download the Information Security Gap Analysis Tool

    4.2.1 Customize the Information Security Charter

    Estimated Time: 1-3 hours

    1. Involve the stakeholders that were present during Phase 1 activities to allow you to build a charter that is truly reflective of your organization.
    2. The purpose of the security charter is too:
      • Establish a mandate for information security within the organization.
      • Communicate executive commitment to risk and information security management.
      • Outline high-level responsibilities for information security within the organization.
      • Establish awareness of information security within the organization.

    A screenshot of the introduction of the 'Information Security Charter' template.

    A security charter is a formalized and defined way to document the scope and purpose of your security program. It will define security governance and allow it to operate efficiently through your mission and vision.

    4.3 Execute on your roadmap

    1. Executing on your information security roadmap will require coordinated effort by multiple teams within your organization. To ensure success, consider the following recommendations:
      1. If you have a project management office, leverage them to help apply formal project management methodologies to your initiatives.
      2. Develop a process to track the tasks on your strategy task list. Because these will not be managed as formal initiatives, it will be easy to lose track of them.
      3. Develop a schedule for regular reporting of progress on the roadmap to senior management. This will help hold yourself and others accountable for moving the project forward.
    2. Plan to review and update the strategy and roadmap on a regular basis. You may need to add, change, or remove initiatives as priorities shift.

    Input

    • Completed Security Gap Analysis Tool

    Output

    • Execution of your strategy and roadmap

    Materials

    • Information Security Gap Analysis Tool
    • Project management tools as required

    Participants

    • Security Team
    • Project Management Office
    • IT and Corporate Teams, as required

    Info-Tech Insight

    Info-Tech has many resources that can help you quickly and effectively implement most of your initiatives. Talk to your account manager to learn more about how we can help your strategy succeed.

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Knowledge Gained

    • Knowledge of organizational pressures and the drivers behind them
    • Insight into stakeholder goals and obligations
    • A defined security risk tolerance information and baseline
    • Comprehensive knowledge of security current state and summary initiatives required to achieve security objectives

    Deliverables Completed

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

    Contact your account representative for more information.

    workshops@infotech.com
    1-888-670-8889

    Additional Support

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

    To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.

    Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    Information Security Program Gap Analysis Tool

    Use our best-of-breed security framework to perform a gap analysis between your current and target states.

    Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool

    Define the business, customer, and compliance alignment for your security program.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Develop a Security Operations Strategy

    A unified security operations process actively transforms security events and threat information into actionable intelligence, driving security prevention, detection, analysis, and response processes, addressing the increasing sophistication of cyberthreats, and guiding continuous improvement.

    This blueprint will walk through the steps of developing a flexible and systematic security operations program relevant to your organization.

    Implement a Security Governance and Management Program

    Your security governance and management program needs to be aligned with business goals to be effective.

    This approach also helps to provide a starting point to develop a realistic governance and management program.

    This project will guide you through the process of implementing and monitoring a security governance and management program that prioritizes security while keeping costs to a minimum.

    Align Your Security Controls to Industry Frameworks for Compliance

    Don’t reinvent the wheel by reassessing your security program using a new framework.

    Instead, use the tools in this blueprint to align your current assessment outcomes to required standards.

    Bibliography

    “2015 Cost of Data Breach Study: United States.” Sponsored by IBM. Ponemon Institute, May 2015. Web.

    “2016 Cost of Cyber Crime Study & the Risk of Business Innovation.” Ponemon Institute, Oct. 2016. Web. 25 Oct. 2016.

    “2016 Cost of Data Breach Study: Global Analysis.” Ponemon Institute, June 2016. Web. 26 Oct. 2016.

    “2016 Data Breach Investigations Report.” Verizon, 2016. Web. 25 Oct. 2016.

    “2016 NowSecure Mobile Security Report.” NowSecure, 2016. Web. 5 Nov. 2016.

    “2017 Cost of Cyber Crime Study.” Ponemon Institute, Oct. 2017. Web.

    “2018 Cost of Data Breach Study: Global Overview.” Ponemon Institute, July 2018. Web.

    “2018 Data Breach Investigations Report.” Verizon, 2018. Web. Oct. 2019.

    “2018 Global State of Information Security Survey.” CSO, 2017. Web.

    “2018 Thales Data Threat Report.” Thales eSecurity, 2018. Web.

    “2019 Data Breach Investigations Report.” Verizon, 2020. Web. Feb. 2020.

    “2019 Global Cost of a Data Breach Study.” Ponemon Institute, Feb. 2020. Web.

    “2019 The Cost of Cyber Crime Study.” Accenture, 2019. Web Jan 2020.

    “2020 Thales Data Threat Report Global Edition.” Thales eSecurity, 2020. Web. Mar. 2020.

    Ben Salem, Malek. “The Cyber Security Leap: From Laggard to Leader.” Accenture, 2015. Web. 20 Oct. 2016.

    “Cisco 2017 Annual Cybersecurity Report.” Cisco, Jan. 2017. Web. 3 Jan. 2017.

    “Cyber Attack – How Much Will You Lose?” Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Oct. 2016. Web. 3 Jan. 2017.

    “Cyber Crime – A Risk You Can Manage.” Hewlett Packard Enterprise, 2016. Web. 3 Jan. 2017.

    “Global IT Security Risks Survey.” Kaspersky Lab, 2015. Web. 20 October 2016.

    “How Much Is the Data on Your Mobile Device Worth?” Ponemon Institute, Jan. 2016. Web. 25 Oct. 2016.

    “Insider Threat 2018 Report.” CA Technologies, 2018. Web.

    “Kaspersky Lab Announces the First 2016 Consumer Cybersecurity Index.” Press Release. Kaspersky Lab, 8 Sept. 2016. Web. 3 Jan. 2017.

    “Kaspersky Lab Survey Reveals: Cyberattacks Now Cost Large Businesses an Average of $861,000.” Press Release. Kaspersky Lab, 13 Sept. 2016. Web. 20 Oct. 2016.

    “Kaspersky Security Bulletin 2016.” Kaspersky Lab, 2016. Web. 25 Oct. 2016.

    “Managing Cyber Risks in an Interconnected World: Key Findings From the Global State of Information Security Survey 2015.” PwC, 30 Sept. 2014. Web.

    “Measuring Financial Impact of IT Security on Business.” Kaspersky Lab, 2016. Web. 25 Oct. 2016.

    “Ponemon Institute Releases New Study on How Organizations Can Leapfrog to a Stronger Cyber Security Posture.” Ponemon Institute, 10 Apr. 2015. Web. 20 Oct. 2016.

    “Predictions for 2017: ‘Indicators of Compromise’ Are Dead.” Kaspersky Lab, 2016. Web. 4 Jan. 2017.

    “Take a Security Leap Forward.” Accenture, 2015. Web. 20 Oct. 2016.

    “Trends 2016: (In)security Everywhere.” ESET Research Laboratories, 2016. Web. 25 Oct. 2016.

    Research Contributors

    • Peter Clay, Zeneth Tech Partners, Principal
    • Ken Towne, Zeneth Tech Partners, Security Architect
    • Luciano Siqueria, Road Track, IT Security Manager
    • David Rahbany, The Hain Celestial Group, Director IT Infrastructure
    • Rick Vadgama, Cimpress, Head of Information Privacy and Security
    • Doug Salah, Wabtec Corp, Manager of Information Security and IT Audit
    • Peter Odegard, Children’s Hospitals and Clinics, Information Security Officer
    • Trevor Butler, City of Lethbridge, Information Technology General Manager
    • Shane Callahan, Tractor Supply, Director of Information Security
    • Jeff Zalusky, Chrysalis, President/CEO
    • Candy Alexander, Independent Consultant, Cybersecurity and Information Security Executive
    • Dan Humbert, YMCA of Central Florida, Director of Information Technology
    • Ron Kirkland, Crawford & Co, Manager ICT Security & Customer Service
    • Jason Bevis – FireEye, Senior Director Orchestration Product Management - Office of the CTO
    • Joan Middleton, Village of Mount Prospect, IT Director
    • Jim Burns, Great America Financial Services, Vice President Information Technology
    • Ryan Breed, Hudson’s Bay, Information Security Analyst
    • James Fielder, Farm Credit Services – Central Illinois, Vice President of Information Systems

    Bring Visibility to Your Day-to-Day Projects

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}444|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.8/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $9,649 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 24 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Portfolio Management
    • Parent Category Link: /portfolio-management
    • As an IT leader, you are responsible for getting new things done while keeping the old things running. These “new things” can come in many forms, e.g. service requests, incidents, and officially sanctioned PMO projects, as well as a category of “unofficial” projects that have been initiated through other channels.
    • These unofficial projects get called many things by different organizations (e.g. level 0 projects,BAU projects, non-PMO projects, day-to-day projects), but they all have the similar characteristics: they are smaller and less complex than larger projects or officially sanctioned projects; they are larger and more risky than operational tasks or incidents; and they are focused on the needs of a specific functional unit and tend to stay within those units to get done.
    • Because these day-to-day projects are small, emergent, team-specific, operationally vital, yet generally perceived as being strategically unimportant, top-level leadership has a limited understanding of them when they are approving and prioritizing major projects. As a result, they approve projects with no insight into how your team’s capacity is already stretched thin by existing demands.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Senior leadership cannot contrast the priority of things that are undocumented. As an IT leader, you need to ensure day-to-day projects receive the appropriate amount of documentation without drowning your team in a process that the types of project don’t warrant.
    • Don’t bleed your project capacity dry by leaving the back door open. When executive oversight took over the strategic portfolio, we assumed they’d resource those projects as a priority. Instead, they focused on “alignment,” “strategic vision,” and “go to market” while failing to secure and defend the resource capacity needed. To focus on the big stuff, you need to sweat the small stuff.

    Impact and Result

    • Develop a method to consistently identify and triage day-to-day projects across functional teams in a standard and repeatable way.
    • Establish a way to balance and prioritize the operational necessity of day-to-day projects against the strategic value of major projects.
    • Build a repeatable process to document and report where the time goes across all given pockets of demand your team faces.

    Bring Visibility to Your Day-to-Day Projects Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should put more portfolio management structure around your day-to-day projects, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Uncover your organization’s hidden pockets of day-to-day projects

    Define an organizational standard for identifying day-to-day projects and triaging them in relation to other categories of projects.

    • Bring Visibility to Your Day-to-Day Projects – Phase 1: Uncover Your Organization’s Hidden Pockets of Day-to-Day Projects
    • Day-to-Day Project Definition Tool
    • Day-to-Day Project Supply/Demand Calculator

    2. Establish ongoing day-to-day project visibility

    Build a process for maintaining reliable day-to-day project supply and demand data.

    • Bring Visibility to Your Day-to-Day Projects – Phase 2: Establish Ongoing Day-to-Day Project Visibility
    • Day-to-Day Project Process Document
    • Day-to-Day Project Intake and Prioritization Tool
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Bring Visibility to Your Day-to-Day Projects

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Analyze the Current State of Day-to-Day Projects

    The Purpose

    Assess the current state of project portfolio management and establish a realistic target state for the management of day-to-day projects.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Realistic and well-informed workshop goals.

    Activities

    1.1 Begin with introductions and workshop expectations activity.

    1.2 Perform PPM SWOT analysis.

    1.3 Assess pain points and analyze root causes.

    Outputs

    Realistic workshop goals and expectations

    PPM SWOT analysis

    Root cause analysis

    2 Establish Portfolio Baselines for Day-to-Day Projects

    The Purpose

    Establish a standard set of baselines for day-to-day projects that will help them to be identified and managed in the same way across different functional teams.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Standardization of project definitions and project value assessments across different functional teams.

    Activities

    2.1 Formalize the definition of a day-to-day project and establish project levels.

    2.2 Develop a project value scorecard for day-to-day projects.

    2.3 Analyze the capacity footprint of day-to-day projects.

    Outputs

    Project identification matrix

    Project value scorecard

    A capacity overview to inform baselines

    3 Build a Target State Process for Day-to-Day Projects

    The Purpose

    Establish a target state process for tracking and monitoring day-to-day projects at the portfolio level.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Standardization of how day-to-day projects are managed and reported on across different functional teams.

    Activities

    3.1 Map current state workflows for the intake and resource management practices (small and large projects).

    3.2 Perform a right-wrong-missing-confusing analysis.

    3.3 Draft a target state process for the initiation of day-to-day projects and for capacity planning.

    Outputs

    Current state workflows

    Right-wrong-missing-confusing analysis

    Target state workflows

    4 Prepare to Implement Your New Processes

    The Purpose

    Start to plan the implementation of your new processes for the portfolio management of day-to-day projects.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    An implementation plan, complete with communication plans, timelines, and goals.

    Activities

    4.1 Perform a change impact and stakeholder management analysis.

    4.2 Perform a start-stop-continue activity.

    4.3 Define an implementation roadmap.

    Outputs

    Change impact and stakeholder analyses

    Start-stop-continue retrospective

    Implementation roadmap

    Develop Meaningful Service Metrics

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}399|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.5/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $20,308 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 30 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Service Management
    • Parent Category Link: /service-management
    • IT organizations measure services from a technology perspective but rarely from a business goal or outcome perspective.
    • Most organizations do a poor job of identifying and measuring service outcomes over the duration of a service’s lifecycle – never ensuring the services remain valuable and meet expected long-term ROI.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Service metrics are critical to ensuring alignment of IT service performance and business service value achievement.
    • Service metrics reinforce positive business and end-user relationships by providing user-centric information that drives responsiveness and consistent service improvement.
    • Poorly designed metrics drive unintended and unproductive behaviors that have negative impacts on IT and produce negative service outcomes.

    Impact and Result

    Effective service metrics will provide the following service gains:

    • Confirm service performance and identify gaps.
    • Drive service improvement to maximize service value.
    • Validate performance improvements while quantifying and demonstrating business value.
    • Ensure service reporting aligns with end-user experience.
    • Achieve and confirm process and regulatory compliance.

    Which will translate into the following relationship gains:

    • Embed IT into business value achievement.
    • Improve the relationship between the business and IT.
    • Achieve higher customer satisfaction (happier end users receiving expected service, the business is able to identify how things are really performing).
    • Reinforce desirable actions and behaviors from both IT and the business.

    Develop Meaningful Service Metrics Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should develop meaningful service metrics, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    • Develop Meaningful Service Metrics – Executive Brief
    • Develop Meaningful Service Metrics – Phases 1-3

    1. Design the metrics

    Identify the appropriate service metrics based on stakeholder needs.

    • Develop Meaningful Service Metrics to Ensure Business and User Satisfaction – Phase 1: Design the Metrics
    • Metrics Development Workbook

    2. Design reports and dashboards

    Present the right metrics in the most interesting and stakeholder-centric way possible.

    • Develop Meaningful Service Metrics to Ensure Business and User Satisfaction – Phase 2: Design Reports and Dashboards
    • Metrics Presentation Format Selection Guide

    3. Implement, track, and maintain

    Run a pilot with a smaller sample of defined service metrics, then continuously validate your approach and make refinements to the processes.

    • Develop Meaningful Service Metrics to Ensure Business and User Satisfaction – Phase 3: Implement, Track, and Maintain
    • Metrics Tracking Tool
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Develop Meaningful Service Metrics

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Design the Metrics

    The Purpose

    Define stakeholder needs for IT based on their success criteria and identify IT services that are tied to the delivery of business outcomes.

    Derive meaningful service metrics based on identified IT services and validate that metrics can be collected and measured.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Design meaningful service metrics from stakeholder needs.

    Validate that metrics can be collected and measured.

    Activities

    1.1 Determine stakeholder needs, goals, and pain points.

    1.2 Determine the success criteria and related IT services.

    1.3 Derive the service metrics.

    1.4 Validate the data collection process.

    1.5 Validate metrics with stakeholders.

    Outputs

    Understand stakeholder priorities

    Adopt a business-centric perspective to align IT and business views

    Derive meaningful business metrics that are relevant to the stakeholders

    Determine if and how the identified metrics can be collected and measured

    Establish a feedback mechanism to have business stakeholders validate the meaningfulness of the metrics

    2 Design Reports and Dashboards

    The Purpose

    Determine the most appropriate presentation format based on stakeholder needs.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Ensure the metrics are presented in the most interesting and stakeholder-centric way possible to guarantee that they are read and used.

    Activities

    2.1 Understand the different presentation options.

    2.2 Assess stakeholder needs for information.

    2.3 Select and design the metric report.

    Outputs

    Learn about infographic, scorecard, formal report, and dashboard presentation options

    Determine how stakeholders would like to view information and how the metrics can be presented to aid decision making

    Select the most appropriate presentation format and create a rough draft of how the report should look

    3 Implement, Track, and Maintain Your Metrics

    The Purpose

    Run a pilot with a smaller sample of defined service metrics to validate your approach.

    Make refinements to the implementation and maintenance processes prior to activating all service metrics.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    High user acceptance and usability of the metrics.

    Processes of identifying and presenting metrics are continuously validated and improved.

    Activities

    3.1 Select the pilot metrics.

    3.2 Gather data and set initial targets.

    3.3 Generate the reports and validate with stakeholders.

    3.4 Implement the service metrics program.

    3.5 Track and maintain the metrics program.

    Outputs

    Select the metrics that should be first implemented based on urgency and impact

    Complete the service intake form for a specific initiative

    Create a process to gather data, measure baselines, and set initial targets

    Establish a process to receive feedback from the business stakeholders once the report is generated

    Identify the approach to implement the metrics program across the organization

    Set up mechanism to ensure the success of the metrics program by assessing process adherence and process validity

    Further reading

    Develop Meaningful Service Metrics

    Select IT service metrics that drive business value.

    ANALYST PERSPECTIVE

    Are you measuring and reporting what the business needs to know?

    “Service metrics are one of the key tools at IT’s disposal in articulating and ensuring its value to the business, yet metrics are rarely designed and used for that purpose.

    Creating IT service metrics directly from business and stakeholder outcomes and goals, written from the business perspective and using business language, is critical to ensuring that the services that IT provides are meeting business needs.

    The ability to measure, manage, and improve IT service performance in relation to critical business success factors, with properly designed metrics, embeds IT in the value chain of the business and ensures IT’s focus on where and how it enables business outcomes.”

    Valence Howden,
    Senior Manager, CIO Advisory
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Our understanding of the problem

    This Research Is Designed For:
    • CIO
    • IT VPs
    This Research Will Help You:
    • Align business/IT objectives (design top-down or outside-in)
    • Significantly improve the relationship between the business and IT aspects of the organization
    • Reinforce desirable actions and behaviors
    This Research Will Also Assist:
    • Service Level Managers
    • Service Owners
    • Program Owners
    This Research Will Help Them
    • Identify unusual deviations from the normal operating state
    • Drive service improvement to maximize service value
    • Validate the value of performance improvements while quantifying and demonstrating benefits realization

    Executive summary

    Situation

    • IT organizations measure services from a technology perspective yet rarely measure services from a business goal/outcome perspective.
    • Most organizations do a poor job of identifying and measuring service outcomes over the duration of a service’s lifecycle – never ensuring the services remain valuable and meet expected long-term ROI.

    Complication

    • IT organizations have difficulty identifying the right metrics to demonstrate the value of IT services to the business in tangible terms.
    • IT metrics, as currently designed, reinforce division between the IT and business perspectives of service performance. They drive siloed thinking and finger-pointing within the IT structure, and prevent IT resources from understanding how their work impacts business value.

    Resolution

    • Our program enables IT to develop the right service metrics to tie IT service performance to business value and user experience.
    • Ensure the metrics you implement have immediate stakeholder value, reinforcing alignment between IT and the business while influencing behavior in the desired direction.
    • Make sure that your metrics are defined in relation to the business goals and drivers, ensuring they will provide actionable outcomes.

    Info-Tech Insight

    1. Service metrics are critical to ensuring alignment of IT service performance and business service value achievement.
    2. Service metrics reinforce positive business and end-user relationships by providing user-centric information that drives responsiveness and consistent service improvement.
    3. Poorly designed metrics drive unintended and unproductive behaviors, which have negative impacts on IT and produce negative service outcomes.

    Service metrics 101

    What are service metrics?

    Service metrics measure IT services in a way that relates to a business outcome. IT needs to measure performance from the business perspective using business language.

    Why do we need service metrics?

    To ensure the business cares about the metrics that IT produces, start with business needs to make sure you’re measuring the right things. This will give IT the opportunity talk to the right stakeholders and develop metrics that will meet their business needs.

    Service metrics are designed with the business perspective in mind, so they are fully aligned with business objectives.

    Perspectives Matter

    Different stakeholders will require different types of metrics. A CEO may require metrics that provide a snapshot of the critical success of the company while a business manager is more concerned about the performance metrics of their department.

    What are the benefits of implementing service metrics?

    Service metrics help IT communicate with the business in business terms and enables IT to articulate how and where they provide business value. Business stakeholders can also easily understand how IT services contribute to their success.

    The majority of CIOs feel metrics relating to business value and stakeholder satisfaction require significant improvement

    A significantly higher proportion of CIOs than CEOs feel that there is significant improvement necessary for business value metrics and stakeholder satisfaction reporting. Stacked horizontal bar chart presenting survey results from CIOs and CXOs of 'Business Value Metrics'. Answer options are 'Effective', 'Some Improvement Necessary', 'Significant Improvement Necessary', and 'Not Required'.N=364

    Stacked horizontal bar chart presenting survey results from CIOs and CXOs of 'Stakeholder Satisfaction Reporting'. Answer options are 'Effective', 'Some Improvement Necessary', 'Significant Improvement Necessary', and 'Not Required'.N=364

    (Source: Info-Tech CIO-CXO Alignment Diagnostic Survey)

    Meaningless metrics are a headache for the business

    A major pitfall of many IT organizations is that they often provide pages of technical metrics that are meaningless to their business stakeholders.

    1. Too Many MetricsToo many metrics are provided and business leaders don’t know what to do with these metrics.
    2. Metrics Are Too TechnicalIT provides technical metrics that are hard to relate to business needs, and methods of calculating metrics are not clearly understood, articulated, and agreed on.
    3. Metrics Have No Business ValueService metrics are not mapped to business goals/objectives and they drive incorrect actions or spend.
    When considering only CEOs who said that stakeholder satisfaction reporting needed significant improvement, the average satisfaction score goes down to 61.6%, which is a drop in satisfaction of 12%.

    A bar that says 73% dropping to a bar that says 61%. Description above.

    (Source: Info-Tech Research Group CIO-CXO Alignment Diagnostic Survey)

    Poorly designed metrics hurt IT’s image within the organization

    By providing metrics that do not articulate the value of IT services, IT reinforces its role as a utility provider and an outsider to strategic decisions.

    When the CIOs believe business value metrics weren’t required, 50% of their CEOs said that significant improvements were necessary.

    Pie Chart presenting the survey results from CEOs regarding 'Business Value Metrics'. Description above.

    (Source: Info-Tech Research Group CIO-CXO Alignment Diagnostic Survey)
    1. Reinforce the wrong behaviorThe wrong metrics drive us-against-them, siloed thinking within IT, and meeting metric targets is prioritized over providing meaningful outcomes.
    2. Do not reflect user experienceMetrics don’t align with actual business/user experience, reinforcing a poor view of IT services.
    3. Effort ≠ ValueInvesting dedicated resources and effort to the achievement of the wrong metrics will only leave IT more constrained for other important initiatives.

    Articulate meaningful service performance that supports the achievement of business outcomes

    Service metrics measure the performance of IT services and how they enable or drive the activity outcomes.

    A business process consists of multiple business activities. In many cases, these business activities require one or more supporting IT services.

    A 'Business Process' broken down to its parts, multiple 'Business Activities' and their 'IT Services'. For each business process, business stakeholders and their goals and objectives should be identified.

    For each business activity that supports the completion of a business process, define the success criteria that must be met in order to produce the desirable outcome.

    Identify the IT services that are used by business stakeholders for each business activity. Measure the performance of these services from a business perspective to arrive at the appropriate service metrics.

    Differentiate between different types of metrics

    Stakeholders have different goals and objectives; therefore, it is critical to identify what type of metrics should be presented to each stakeholder.

    Business Metrics

    Determine Business Success

    Business metrics are derived from a pure business perspective. These are the metrics that the business stakeholders will measure themselves on, and business success is determined using these metrics.

    Arrow pointing right.

    Service Metrics

    Manage Service Value to the Business

    Service metrics are used to measure IT service performance against business outcomes. These metrics, while relating to IT services, are presented in business terms and are tied to business goals.

    Arrow pointing right.

    IT Metrics

    Enable Operational Excellence

    IT metrics are internal to the IT organization and used to manage IT service delivery. These metrics are technical, IT-specific, and drive action for IT. They are not presented to the business, and are not written in business language.

    Implementing service metrics is a key step in becoming a service provider and business partner

    As a prerequisite, IT organizations must have already established a solid relationship with the business and have a clear understanding of its critical business-facing services.

    At the very least, IT needs to have a service-oriented view and understand the specific needs and objectives associated with each stakeholder.

    Visualization of 'Business Relationship Management' with an early point on the line representing 'Service Provider: Establish service-oriented culture and business-centric service delivery', and the end of the line being 'Strategic Partner'.

    Once IT can present service metrics that the business cares about, it can continue on the service provider journey by managing the performance of services based on business needs, determine and influence service demand, and assess service value to maximize benefits to the business.

    Which processes drive service metrics?

    Both business relationship management (BRM) and service level management (SLM) provide inputs into and receive outputs from service metrics.

    Venn Diagram of 'Business Relationship Management', 'Service Metrics', and 'Service Level Management'.

    Business Relationship Management

    BRM works to understand the goals and objectives of the business and inputs them into the design of the service metrics.

    Service Metrics

    BRM leverages service metrics to help IT organizations manage the relationship with the business.

    BRM articulates and manages expectations and ensures IT services are meeting business requirements.

    Which processes drive service metrics?

    Both BRM and SLM provide inputs into and receive outputs from service metrics.

    Venn Diagram of 'Business Relationship Management', 'Service Metrics', and 'Service Level Management'.

    Service Level Management

    SLM works with the business to understand service requirements, which are key inputs in designing the service metrics.

    Service Metrics

    SLM leverages service metrics in overseeing the day-to-day delivery of IT services. It ensures they are provided to meet expected service level targets and objectives.

    Effective service metrics will deliver both service gains and relationship gains

    Effective service metrics will provide the following service gains:

    • Confirm service performance and identify gaps
    • Drive service improvement to maximize service value
    • Validate performance improvements while quantifying and demonstrating business value
    • Ensure service reporting aligns with end-user experience
    • Achieve and confirm process and regulatory compliance
        Which will translate into the following relationship gains:
        • Embed IT into business value achievement
        • Improve relationship between the business and IT
        • Achieve higher customer satisfaction (happier end users receiving expected service, the business is able to identify how things are really performing)
        • Reinforce desirable actions and behaviors from both IT and the business

    Don’t let conventional wisdom become your roadblock

    Conventional Wisdom

    Info-Tech Perspective

    Metrics are measured from an application or technology perspective Metrics need to be derived from a service and business outcome perspective.
    The business doesn’t care about metrics Metrics are not usually designed to speak in business terms about business outcomes. Linking metrics to business objectives creates metrics that the business cares about.
    It is difficult to have a metrics discussion with the business It is not a metrics/number discussion, it is a discussion on goals and outcomes.
    Metrics are only presented for the implementation of the service, not the ongoing outcome of the service IT needs to focus on service outcome and not project outcome.
    Quality can’t be measured Quality must be measured in order to properly manage services.

    Our three-phase approach to service metrics development

    Let Info-Tech guide you through your service metrics journey

    1

    2

    3

    Design Your Metrics Develop and Validate Reporting Implement, Track, and Maintain
    Sample of Phase 1 of Info-Tech's service metric development package, 'Design Your Metrics'. Sample of Phase 2 of Info-Tech's service metric development package, 'Develop and Validate Reporting'. Sample of Phase 3 of Info-Tech's service metric development package, 'Implement, Track, and Maintain'.
    Start the development and creation of your service metrics by keeping business perspectives in mind, so they are fully aligned with business objectives. Identify the most appropriate presentation format based on stakeholder preference and need for metrics. Track goals and success metrics for your service metrics programs. It allows you to set long-term goals and track your results over time.

    CIOs must actively lead the design of the service metrics program

    The CIO must actively demonstrate support for the service metrics program and lead the initial discussions to determine what matters to business leaders.

    1. Lead the initiative by defining the need
      Show visible support and demonstrate importance
    2. Articulate the value to both IT and the business
      Establish the urgency and benefits
    3. Select and assemble an implementation group
      Find the best people to get the job done
    4. Drive initial metrics discussions: goals, objectives, actions
      Lead brainstorming with senior business leaders
    5. Work with the team to determine presentation formats and communication methods
      Identify the best presentation approach for senior stakeholders
    6. Establish a feedback loop for senior management
      Solicit feedback on improvements
    7. Validate the success of the metrics
      Confirm service metrics support business outcomes

    Measure the success of your service metrics

    It is critical to determine if the designed service metrics are fulfilling their intended purpose. The process of maintaining the service metrics program and the outcomes of implementing service metrics need to be monitored and tracked.

    Validating Service Metrics Design

    Target Outcome

    Related Metrics

    The business is enabled to identify and improve service performance to their end customer # of improvement initiatives created based on service metrics
    $ cost savings/revenue generated due to actions derived from service metrics

    Procedure to validate the usefulness of IT metrics

    # / % of service metrics added/removed per year

    Alignment between IT and business objectives and processes Business’ satisfaction with IT

    Measure the success of your service metrics

    It is critical to determine if the designed service metrics are fulfilling their intended purpose. The process of maintaining the service metrics program and the outcomes of implementing service metrics need to be monitored and tracked.

    Validating Service Metrics Process

    Target Outcome

    Related Metrics

    Properly defined service metrics aligned with business goals/outcomes
    Easy understood measurement methodologies
    % of services with (or without) defined service metrics

    % of service metrics tied to business goals

    Consistent approach to review and adjust metrics# of service metrics adjusted based on service reviews

    % of service metrics reviewed on schedule

    Demonstrate monetary value and impact through the service metrics program

    In a study done by the Aberdeen Group, organizations engaged in the use of metrics benchmarking and measurement have:
    • 88% customer satisfaction rate
    • 60% service profitability
    • 15% increase in workforce productivity over the last 12 months

    Stock image of a silhouette of three people's head and shoulders.
    (Source: Aberdeen Group. “Service Benchmarking and Measurement.”)

    A service metric is defined for: “Response time for Business Application A

    The expected response time has not been achieved and this is visible in the service metrics. The reduced performance has been identified as having an impact of $250,000 per month in lost revenue potential.

    The service metric drove an action to perform a root-cause analysis, which identified a network switch issue and drove a resolution action to fix the technology and architect redundancy to ensure continuity.

    The fix eliminated the performance impact, allowing for recovery of the $250K per month in revenue, improved end-user confidence in the organization, and increased use of the application, creating additional revenue.

    Implementing and measuring a video conferencing service

    CASE STUDY
    Industry: Manufacturing | Source: CIO interview and case material
    Situation

    The manufacturing business operates within numerous countries and requires a lot of coordination of functions and governance oversight. The company has monthly meetings, both regional and national, and key management and executives travel to attend and participate in the meetings.

    Complication

    While the meetings provide a lot of organizational value, the business has grown significantly and the cost of business travel has started to become prohibitive.

    Action

    It was decided that only a few core meetings would require onsite face-to-face meetings, and for all other meetings, the company would look at alternative means. The face-to-face aspect of the meetings was still considered critical so they focused on options to retain that aspect.

    The IT organization identified that they could provide a video conferencing service to meet the business need. The initiative was approved and rolled out in the organization.

    Result:

    IT service metrics needed to be designed to confirm that the expected value outcome of the implementation of video conferencing was achieved.

    Under the direction of the CIO, the business goals and needs driving use of the service (i.e. reduction in travel costs, efficiency, no loss of positive outcome) were used to identify success criteria and key questions to confirm success.

    With this information, the service manager was able to implement relevant service metrics in business language and confirmed an 80% adoption rate and a 95% success rate in term meetings running as expected and achieving core outcomes.

    Use these icons to help direct you as you navigate this research

    Use these icons to help guide you through each step of the blueprint and direct you to content related to the recommended activities.

    A small monochrome icon of a wrench and screwdriver creating an X.

    This icon denotes a slide where a supporting Info-Tech tool or template will help you perform the activity or step associated with the slide. Refer to the supporting tool or template to get the best results and proceed to the next step of the project.

    A small monochrome icon depicting a person in front of a blank slide.

    This icon denotes a slide with an associated activity. The activity can be performed either as part of your project or with the support of Info-Tech team members, who will come onsite to facilitate a workshop for your organization.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Develop meaningful service metrics to ensure business and user satisfaction

    1. Design the Metrics 2. Design Reports and Dashboards 3. Implement, Track, and Maintain
    Supporting Tool icon

    Best-Practice Toolkit

    1. Defining stakeholder needs for IT based on their success criteria
    2. Derive meaningful service metrics based on identified IT services and validate with business stakeholders
    3. Validate metrics can be collected and measured
    4. Determine calculation methodology
    1. Presentation format selected based on stakeholder needs and preference for information
    2. Presentation format validated with stakeholders
    1. Identify metrics that will be presented first to the stakeholders based on urgency or impact of the IT service
    2. Determine the process to collect data, select initial targets, and integrate with SLM and BRM functions
    3. Roll out the metrics implementation for a broader audience
    4. Establish roles and timelines for metrics maintenance

    Guided Implementations

    • Design metrics based on business needs
    • Validate the metrics
    • Select presentation format
    • Review metrics presentation design
    • Select and implement pilot metrics
    • Determine rollout process and establish maintenance/tracking mechanism
    Associated Activity icon

    Onsite Workshop

    Module 1:
    Derive Service Metrics From Business Goals
    Module 2:
    Select and Design Reports and Dashboards
    Module 3:
    Implement, Track, and Maintain Your Metrics to Ensure Success
    Phase 1 Outcome:
    • Meaningful service metrics designed from stakeholder needs
    Phase 2 Outcome:
    • Appropriate presentation format selected for each stakeholder
    Phase 3 Outcome:
    • Metrics implemented and process established to maintain and track program success

    Workshop overview

    Contact your account representative or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.
    Workshop Day 1 Workshop Day 2 Workshop Day 3 Workshop Day 4
    Design the Metrics
    Determine Presentation Format and Implement Metrics
    Gather Service Level Requirements
    Monitor and Improve Service Levels

    Activities

    • 1.1 Determine stakeholder needs
    • 1.2 Determine success criteria and key performance indicators
    • 1.3 Derive metrics
    • 1.4 Validate the metric collection
    • 2.1 Discuss stakeholder needs/preference for data and select presentation format
    • 2.2 Select and design the metric report
    • Requirements
    • 3.1 Determine the business requirements
    • 3.2 Negotiate service levels
    • 3.3 Align operational level agreements (OLAs) and supplier contracts
    • 4.1 Conduct service report and perform service review
    • 4.2 Communicate service review
    • 4.3 Remediate issues using action plan
    • 4.4 Proactive prevention

    Deliverables

    1. Metrics Development Workbook
    1. Metrics Presentation Format Selection Guide
    2. Metrics Tracking Tool
    1. Service Level Management SOP
    2. Service Level Agreement
    1. Service Level Report
    2. Service Level Review
    3. Business Satisfaction Report

    Develop Meaningful Service Metrics to Ensure Business and User Satisfaction

    PHASE 1

    Design the Metrics

    Step (1): Design the Metrics

    PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3

    1.1

    Derive the Service Metrics

    1.2

    Validate the Metrics

    2.1

    Determine Reporting Format

    3.1

    Select Pilot Metrics

    3.2

    Activate and Maintain Metrics

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • Business Relationship Manager (BRM)
    • Service Level Manager (SLM)

    Outcomes of this step

    • Defined stakeholder needs for IT based on their success criteria
    • Identified IT services that are tied to the delivery of business outcomes
    • Derived meaningful service metrics based on identified IT services and validated with business stakeholders
    • Validated that metrics can be collected and measured
    • Determined calculation methodology

    Phase 1 outline

    Associated Activity icon Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 1: Design the Metrics

    Proposed Time to Completion (in weeks): 4 weeks
    Step 1.1: Design Metrics Step 1.2: Validate the Metrics
    Start with an analyst kick-off call:
    • Determine the stakeholder and their needs
    • Identify IT services that are tied to the delivery of business outcomes
    • Derive the service metrics
    Review findings with analyst:
    • For the selected metrics, identify the data source for collection
    • Validate whether or not the data can be created
    • Create a calculation method for the metrics
    Then complete these activities…
    • Using the methodology provided, identify additional stakeholders and map out their success criteria, including KPIs to determine the appropriate service metrics
    Then complete these activities…
    • Determine whether the designed metrics are measurable, and if so, how
    With these tools & templates:
    • Metrics Development Workbook
    With these tools & templates:
    • Metrics Development Workbook

    Design your service metrics – overview

    Figure representing 'CIO'. Step 1
    Derive your service metrics

    Metrics Worksheet

    Figure representing 'SLM' and/or 'BRM'. Step 2
    Validate your metrics

    Metrics Worksheet

    Figures representing 'CIO', 'SLM', and/or 'BRM'. Step 3
    Confirm with stakeholders

    Metrics Tracking Sheet

    A star.

    Defined IT Service Metrics

    Deriving the right metrics is critical to ensuring that you will generate valuable and actionable service metrics.

    Derive your service metrics from business objectives and needs

    Service metrics must be designed with the business perspective in mind so they are fully aligned with business objectives.

    Thus, IT must start by identifying specific stakeholder needs. The more IT understands about the business, the more relevant the metrics will be to the business stakeholders.

    1. Who are your stakeholders?
    2. What are their goals and pain points?
    3. What do the stakeholders need to know?
    4. What do I need to measure?
    5. Derive your service metrics

    Derive your service metrics

    Supporting Tool icon 1.1 Metrics Development Workbook

    This workbook guides the development and creation of service metrics that are directly tied to stakeholder needs.

    This process will ensure that your service metrics are designed with the business perspective in mind so they are fully aligned with business objectives.

    1. Who are the relevant stakeholders?
    2. What are the goals and pain points of your stakeholders?
    3. What do the stakeholders need to know?
    4. What does IT need to measure?
    5. What are the appropriate IT metrics?

    Download the Metrics Development Workbook.

    Sample of Info-Tech's Metrics Development Workbook.

    Determine your stakeholders

    Supporting Tool icon 1.1 0.5 Hour

    Who are your stakeholders?

    1. Identify the primary stakeholders of your service metrics. Stakeholders are the people who have a very specific need to know about how IT services affect their business outcomes. Different stakeholders can have different perspective on the same IT service metric.Most often, the primary target of service metrics are the business stakeholders, e.g. VP of a business unit.
    2. Identify any additional stakeholders. The CIO is also a stakeholder since they are effectively the business relationship manager for the senior leaders.

    Video Conferencing Case Study
    Manufacturing company

    For this phase, we will demonstrate how to derive the service metrics by going through the steps in the methodology.

    At a manufacturing company, the CIO’s main stakeholder is the CEO, whose chief concern is to improve the financial position of the company.

    Identify goals and pain points of your stakeholders

    Supporting Tool icon 1.2 0.5 Hour

    What are their goals and pain points?

    1. Clearly identify each stakeholder’s business goals and outcomes. These would be particular business goals related to a specific business unit.
    2. Identify particular pain points for each business unit to understand what is preventing them from achieving the desirable business outcome.

    VC Case Study

    One of the top initiatives identified by the company to improve financial performance was to reduce expense.

    Because the company has several key locations in different states, company executives used to travel extensively to carry out meetings at each location.

    Therefore, travel expenses represent a significant proportion of operational expenses and reducing travel costs is a key goal for the company’s executives.

    What do the stakeholders need to know?

    Supporting Tool icon 1.3 0.5 Hour

    What do the stakeholders need to know?

    1. Identify the key things that the stakeholders would need to know based on the goals and pain points derived from the previous step.These are your success criteria and must be met to successfully achieve the desired goals.

    VC Case Study

    The CEO needs to have assurance that without executives traveling to each location, remote meetings can be as effective as in-person meetings.

    These meetings must provide the same outcome and allow executives to collaborate and make similar strategic decisions without the onsite, physical presence.

    Therefore, the success criteria are:

    • Reduced travel costs
    • Effective collaboration
    • High-quality meetings

    What do I need to measure?

    Supporting Tool icon 1.4 1 Hour

    What does IT need to measure?

    1. Identify the IT services that are leveraged to achieve the business goals and success criteria.
    2. Identify the users of those services and determine the nature of usage for each group of users.
    3. Identify the key indicators that must be measured for those services from an IT perspective.

    VC Case Study

    The IT department decides to implement the video conferencing service to reduce the number of onsite meetings. This technology would allow executives to meet remotely with both audio and video and is the best option to replicate a physical meeting.

    The service is initially available to senior executives and will be rolled out to all internal users once the initial implementation is deemed successful.

    To determine the success of the service, the following needs to be measured:

    1. Outcomes of VC meetings
    2. Quality of the VC meetings
    3. Reduction in travel expenses

    Derive service metrics

    Supporting Tool icon 1.5 0.5 Hour

    Derive your service metrics

    1. Derive the service metrics that are meaningful to business stakeholders based on the IT services and the key indicators identified in the previous steps.
    2. Distinguish between service metrics and business metrics. You may identify some business metrics in addition to the IT metrics, and although these are important, IT doesn’t own the process of tracking and reporting business metrics.

    VC Case Study

    In the previous step, IT identified that it must measure the outcomes of VC meetings, quality of the VC meetings, and the reduction in travel expenses. From these, the appropriate service metrics can be derived to answer the needs of the CEO.

    IT needs to measure:

    1. Percent of VC meetings successfully delivered
    2. Growth of number of executive meetings conducted via VC
    Outcomes

    IT also identified the following business metrics:

    1. Reduction in percent of travel expense/spend
    2. Reduction in lost time due to travel

    Validate your metrics

    Once appropriate service metrics are derived from business objectives, the next step is to determine whether or not it is viable to actually measure the metrics.

    Can you measure it? The first question IT must answer is whether the metric is measurable. IT must identify the data source, validate its ability to collect the data, and specify the data requirement. Not all metrics can be measured!
    How will you measure it? If the metric is measurable, the next step is to create a way to measure the actual data. In most cases, simple formulas that can be easily understood are the best approach.
    Define your actions Metrics must be used to drive or reinforce desirable outcomes and behaviors. Thus, IT must predetermine the necessary actions associated with the different metric levels, thresholds, or trends.

    Determine if you can measure the identified metric

    Supporting Tool icon 1.6 0.5 Hour

    INSTRUCTIONS

    1. Determine what data sources are available. Make sure that you know where the information you need is captured, or will need to be captured. This would include:
      • A ticket/request system
      • An auto discovery tool
      • A configuration management database ( CMDB)
    2. Confirm that IT has the ability to collect the information.
      • If the necessary data is already contained in an identified data source, then you can proceed.
      • If not, consider whether it’s possible to gather the information using current sources and systems.
      • Understand the constraints and cost/ROI to implement new technology or revise processes and data gathering to produce the data.

    VC Case Study

    Using the metric derived from the video conferencing service example, IT wants to measure the % of VC meetings successfully delivered.

    What are the data sources?

    • Number of VC meetings that took place
    • Number of service incidents
    • User survey

    Determine if you can measure the identified metric

    Supporting Tool icon 1.6 0.5 Hour

    INSTRUCTIONS

    1. Understand your data requirements
      • To produce relevant metrics from your data, you need to ensure the level of quality and currency that provides you with useful information. You need to define:
        • The level of detail that has to be captured to make the data useful.
        • The consistency of the data, and how it needs to be entered or gathered.
        • The accuracy of the data. This includes how current the data needs to be, how quickly changes have to be made, and how data quality will be verified.

    VC Case Study

    Data requirement for percent of successful VC meetings:

    • Level of detail – user category, location, date/time,
    • Consistency – how efficiently are VC-related incidents opened and closed? Is the data collected and stored consistently?
    • Accuracy – is the information entered accurately?

    Create the calculation to measure it

    Supporting Tool icon 1.7 0.5 Hour

    Determine how to calculate the metrics.

    INSTRUCTIONS
    1. Develop the calculations that will be used for each accepted metric. The measurement needs to be clear and straightforward.
    2. Define the scope and assumptions for each calculation, including:
      • The defined measurement period (e.g. monthly, weekly)
      • Exclusions (e.g. nonbusiness hours, during maintenance windows)

    VC Case Study

    Metric: Percent of VC meetings delivered successfully

    IT is able to determine the total number of VC meetings that took place and the number of VC service requests to the help desk.

    That makes it possible to use the following formula to determine the success percentage of the VC service:

    ((total # VC) – (# of VC with identified incidents)) / (total # VC) * 100

    Define the actions to be taken for each metric

    Supporting Tool icon 1.7 1.5 Hour

    INSTRUCTIONS

    Centered on the defined metrics and their calculations, IT can decide on the actions that should be driven out of each metric based on one of the following scenarios:
    • Scenario 1: Ad hoc remedial action and root-cause investigation. If the reason for the result is unknown, determining root cause or identifying trends is required to determine required actions.
    • Scenario 2: Predefined remedial action. A set of predetermined actions associated with different results. This is useful when the meaning of the results is clear and points to specific issues within the environment.
    • Scenario 3: Nonremedial action. The metrics may produce a result that reinforces or supports company direction and strategy, or identifies an opportunity that may drive a new initiative or idea.

    VC Case Study

    If the success rate of the VC meetings is below 90%, IT needs to focus on determining if there is a common cause and identify if this is a consistent downward trend.

    A root-cause analysis is performed that identifies that network issues are causing difficulties, impacting the connection quality and usability of the VC service.

    Validate the confirmed metrics with the business

    Supporting Tool icon 1.8 1 Hour

    INPUT: Selected service metrics, Discussion with the business

    OUTPUT: Validated metrics with the business

    Materials: Metrics with calculation methodology

    Participants: IT and business stakeholders, Service owners

    INSTRUCTIONS

    1. Once you have derived the appropriate metrics and established that the metrics are measurable, you must go back to the targeted stakeholders and validate that the selected metrics will provide the right information to meet their identified goals and success criteria.
    2. Add confirmed metrics to the Metrics Tracking Tool, in the Metrics Tracking Plan tab.
    Service Metric Corresponding
    Business Goal
    Measurement
    Method
    Defined Actions

    Example: Measuring the online banking service at a financial institution

    Who are IT’s stakeholders? The financial institution provides various banking solutions to its customers. Retail banking is a core service offered by the bank and the VP of retail banking is a major stakeholder of IT.
    What are their goals and pain points? The VP of retail banking’s highest priorities are to increase revenue, increase market share, and maintain the bank’s brand and reputation amongst its customers.
    What do they need to know? In order to measure success, the VP of retail banking needs to determine performance in attracting new clients, retaining clients, expanding into new territory, and whether they have increased the number of services provided to existing clients.
    What does IT need to measure? The recent implementation of an online banking service is a key initiative that will keep the bank competitive and help retail banking meet its goals. The key indicators of this service are: the total number of clients, the number of products per client, percent of clients using online banking, number of clients by segment, service, territory.
    Derive the service metrics Based on the key indicators, IT can derive the following service metrics:
    1. Number of product applications originated from online banking
    2. Customer satisfaction/complaints
    As part of the process, IT also identified some business metrics, such as the number of online banking users per month or the number of times a client accesses online banking per month.

    Design service metrics to track service performance and value

    CASE STUDY
    Industry: Manufacturing | Source: CIO
    Challenge Solution Results
    The IT organization needed to generate metrics to show the business whether the video conferencing service was being adopted and if it was providing the expected outcome and value.

    Standard IT metrics were technical and did not provide a business context that allowed for easy understanding of performance and decision making.

    The IT organization, working through the CIO and service managers, sat down with the key business stakeholders of the video conferencing service.

    They discussed the goals for the meeting and defined the success criteria for those goals in the context of video conference meeting outcomes.

    The success criteria that were discussed were then translated into a set of questions (key performance indicators) that if answered, would show that the success criteria were achieved.

    The service manager identified what could be measured to answer the defined questions and eliminated any metrics that were either business metrics or non-IT related.

    The remaining metrics were identified as the possible service metrics, and the ability to gather the information and produce the metric was confirmed.

    Service metrics were defined for:

    1. Percent of video conference meetings delivered successfully
    2. Growth in the number of executive meetings conducted via video conference

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech Workshop Associated Activity icon

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    Photo of Valence Howden, Senior Manager, CIO Advisory, Info-Tech Research Group.
    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analyst will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech's historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    1.1

    Sample of activity 1.1 'Determine your stakeholders'. Determine stakeholder needs, goals, and pain points

    The onsite analyst will help you select key stakeholders and analyze their business objectives and current pain points.

    1.2

    Sample of activity 1.2 'Identify goals and pain points of your stakeholders'. Determine the success criteria and related IT services

    The analyst will facilitate a discussion to uncover the information that these stakeholders care about. The group will also identify the IT services that are supporting these objectives.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech Workshop Associated Activity icon

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    1.5

    Sample of activity 1.5 'Derive service metrics'. Derive the service metrics

    Based on the key performance indicators obtained in the previous page, derive meaningful business metrics that are relevant to the stakeholders.

    1.6

    Sample of activity 1.6 'Determine if you can measure the identified metric'. Validate the data collection process

    The analyst will help the workshop group determine whether the identified metrics can be collected and measured. If so, a calculation methodology is created.

    1.7

    Sample of activity 1.7 'Create the caluclation to measure it'. Validate metrics with stakeholders

    Establish a feedback mechanism to have business stakeholders validate the meaningfulness of the metrics.

    Develop Meaningful Service Metrics to Ensure Business and User Satisfaction

    PHASE 2

    Design Reports and Dashboards

    Step (2): Design Reports and Dashboards

    PHASE 1PHASE 2PHASE 3

    1.1

    Derive the Service Metrics

    1.2

    Validate the Metrics

    2.1

    Determine Reporting Format

    3.1

    Select Pilot Metrics

    3.2

    Activate and Maintain Metrics

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Relationship Manager
    • Service Level Manager
    • Business Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • Presentation format selected based on stakeholder needs and preference for information
    • Presentation format validated with stakeholders

    Phase 2 outline

    Associated Activity icon Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 2: Design Reports and Dashboards

    Proposed Time to Completion (in weeks): 3 weeks
    Step 2.1: Select Presentation Format Step 2.2: Review Design
    Start with an analyst kick-off call:
    • Review the different format of metrics presentation and discuss the pros/cons of each format
    • Discuss stakeholder needs/preference for data
    • Select the presentation format
    Review findings with analyst:
    • Discuss stakeholder feedback based on selected presentation format
    • Modify and adjust the presentation format as needed
    Then complete these activities…
    • Design the metrics using the selected format
    Then complete these activities…
    • Finalize the design for metrics presentation
    With these tools & templates:
    • Metrics Presentation Format Selection Guide
    With these tools & templates:
    • Metrics Presentation Format Selection Guide

    Design the reports – overview

    Figure representing 'SLM' and/or 'BRM'. Step 1
    Understand the pros and cons of different reporting styles
    Figure representing 'SLM' and/or 'BRM'. Step 2
    Determine your reporting and presentation style

    Presentation Format Selection

    Figure representing 'SLM' and/or 'BRM'. Step 3
    Design your metrics reports
    A star.

    Validated Service Reports

    The design of service metrics reporting is critically important. The reporting style must present the right information in the most interesting and stakeholder-centric way possible to ensure that it is read and used.

    The reports must also display information in a way that generates actions. If your stakeholders cannot make decisions, kick off activities, or ask questions based on your reports, then they have no value.

    Determine the right presentation format for your metrics

    Most often, metrics are presented in the following ways:

    Dashboard
    (PwC. “Mega-Trends and Implications.”)
    Sample of the 'Dashboard' metric presentation format.
    Infographic
    (PwC. “Healthcare’s new entrants.”)
    Sample of the 'Infographic' metric presentation format.
    Report
    (PwC Blogs. “Northern Lights.”)
    Sample of the 'Report' metric presentation format.
    Scorecard
    (PwC. “Annual Report 2015.”)
    Sample of the 'Scorecard' metric presentation format.

    Understand the advantages and disadvantages of each reporting style – Dashboard

    A dashboard is a reporting method that provides a dynamic at-a-glance view of key metrics from the perspective of key stakeholders. It provides a quick graphical way to process important performance information in real time.

    Features

    Typically web-based

    Dynamic data that is updated in real time

    Advantage

    Aggregates a lot of information into a single view

    Presents metrics in a simplistic style that is well understood

    Provides a quick point-in-time view of performance

    Easy to consume visual presentation style

    Disadvantage

    Complicated to set up well.
    Requires additional technology support: programming, API, etc.

    Promotes a short-term outlook – focus on now, no historical performance and no future trends. Doesn’t provide the whole picture and story.

    Existing dashboard tools are often not customized enough to provide real value to each stakeholder.

    Dashboards present real-time metrics that can be accessed and viewed at any time

    Sample of the 'Dashboard' metric presentation format.
    (Source: PwC. “Mega-Trends and Implications.”)
    Metrics presented through online dashboards are calculated in real time, which allows for a dynamic, current view into the performance of IT services at any time.

    Understand the advantages and disadvantages of each reporting style – Infographic

    An infographic is a graphical representation of metrics or data, which is used to show information quickly and clearly. It’s based on the understanding that people retain and process visual information more readily than written details.

    Features

    Turns dry into attractive –transforms data into eye-catching visual memory that is easier to retain

    Can be used as the intro to a formal report

    There are endless types of infographics

    Advantage

    Easily consumable

    Easy to retain

    Eye catching

    Easily shared

    Spurs conversation

    Customizable

    Disadvantage

    Require design expertise and resources

    Can be time consuming to generate

    Could be easily misinterpreted

    Message can be lost with poor design

    Infographics allow for completely unique designs

    Sample of the 'Infographic' metric presentation format.
    (Source: PwC. “Healthcare’s new entrants…”)
    There is no limit when it comes to designing an infographic. The image used here visually articulates the effects of new entrants pulling away the market.

    Understand the advantages and disadvantages of each reporting style – Formal Report

    A formal report is a more structured and official reporting style that contains detailed research, data, and information required to enable specific business decisions, and to help evaluate performance over a defined period of time.

    Definition

    Metrics can be presented as a component of a periodic, formal report

    A physical document that presents detailed information to a particular audience

    Advantage

    More detailed, more structured and broader reporting period

    Formal, shows IT has put in the effort

    Effectively presents a broader and more complete story

    Targets different stakeholders at the same time

    Disadvantage

    Requires significant effort and resources

    Higher risk if the report does not meet the expectation of the business stakeholder

    Done at a specific time and only valuable for that specific time period

    Harder to change format

    Formal reports provide a detailed view and analysis of performance

    Sample of the 'Formal Report' metric presentation format.
    (Source: PwC Blogs. “Northern Lights: Where are we now?”)
    An effective report incorporates visuals to demonstrate key improvements.

    Formal reports can still contain visuals, but they are accompanied with detailed explanations.

    Understand the advantages and disadvantages of each reporting style – Scorecard

    A scorecard is a graphic view of the progress and performance over time of key performance metrics. These are in relation to specified goals based on identified critical stakeholder objectives.

    Features

    Incorporates multiple metrics effectively.

    Scores services against the most important organizational goals and objectives. Scorecards may tie back into strategy and different perspectives of success.

    Advantage

    Quick view of performance against objectives

    Measure against a set of consistent objectives

    Easily consumable

    Easy to retain

    Disadvantage

    Requires a lot of forethought

    Scorecards provide a time-bound summary of performance against defined goals

    Sample of the 'Scorecard' metric presentation format.
    (PwC. “Annual Report 2015.”)
    Scorecards provide a summary of performance that is directly linked to the organizational KPIs.

    Determine your report style

    Supporting Tool icon 2.1 Metrics Presentation Format Selection Guide

    In this section, you will determine the optimal reporting style for the service metrics.

    This guide contains four questions, which will help IT organizations identify the most appropriate presentation format based on stakeholder preference and needs for metrics.

    1. Who is the relevant stakeholder?
    2. What are the defined actions for the metric?
    3. How frequently does the stakeholder need to see the metric?
    4. How does the stakeholder like to receive information?
    Sample of Info-Tech's Metrics Presentation Format Selection Guide.
    Download the Metrics Presentation Format Selection Guide.

    Determine your best presentation option

    Supporting Tool icon 2.1 2 Hours

    INPUT: Identified stakeholder and his/her role

    OUTPUT: Proper presentation format based on need for information

    Materials: Metrics Presentation Format Selection Guide

    Participants: BRM, SLM, Program Manager

    After deciding on the report type to be used to present the metric, the organization needs to consider how stakeholders will consume the metric.

    There are three options based on stakeholder needs and available presentation options within IT.

    1. Paper-based presentation is the most traditional form of reporting and works well with stakeholders who prefer physical copies. The report is produced at a specific time and requires no additional IT capability.
    2. Online documents stored on webpages, SharePoint, or another knowledge management system could be used to present the metrics. This allows the report to be linked to other information and easily shared.
    3. Online dashboards and graphics can be used to have dynamic, real-time reporting and anytime access. These webpages can be incorporated into an intranet and allow the user to view the metrics at any time. This will require IT to continuously update the data in order to maintain the accuracy of the metrics.

    Design your metric reports with these guidelines in mind

    Supporting Tool icon 2.2 30 Minutes
    1. Stakeholder-specificThe report must be driven by the identified stakeholder needs and preferences and articulate the metrics that are important to them.
    2. ClarityTo enable decision making and drive desired actions, the metrics must be clear and straightforward. They must be presented in a way that clearly links the performance measurement to the defined outcome without leading to different interpretations of the results.
    3. SimplicityThe report must be simple to read, understand, and analyze. The language of the report must be business-centric and remove as much complexity as possible in wording, imaging, and context.

    Be sure to consider access rights for more senior reports. Site and user access permissions may need to be defined based on the level of reporting.

    Metrics reporting on the video conferencing service

    CASE STUDY
    Industry: Manufacturing | Source: CIO Interview
    The Situation

    The business had a clear need to understand if the implementation of video conferencing would allow previously onsite meetings to achieve the same level of effectiveness.

    Reporting Context

    Provided reports had always been generated from an IT perspective and the business rarely used the information to make decisions.

    The metrics needed to help the business understand if the meetings were remaining effective and be tied into the financial reporting against travel expenses, but there would be limited visibility during the executive meetings.

    Approach

    The service manager reviewed the information that he had gathered to confirm how often they needed information related to the service. He also met with the CIO to get some insight into the reports that were already being provided to the business, including the ones that were most effective.

    Considerations

    The conversations identified that there was no need for a dynamic real-time view of the performance of the service, since tracking of cost savings and utility would be viewed monthly and quarterly. They also identified that the item would be discussed within a very small window of time during the management meetings.

    The Solution

    It was determined that the best style of reporting for the metric was an existing scorecard that was produced monthly, using some infographics to ensure that the information is clear at a glance to enable quick decision making.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech Workshop Associated Activity icon

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    Photo of Valence Howden, Senior Manager, CIO Advisory, Info-Tech Research Group.
    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analyst will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech's historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    2.1

    Sample of presentation format option slide 'Determine the right presentation format for your metrics'. Understand the different presentation options

    The onsite analyst will introduce the group to the communication vehicles of infographic, scorecard, formal report, and dashboard.

    2.1

    Sample of activity 2.1 'Determine your best presentation option'. Assess stakeholder needs for information

    For selected stakeholders, the analyst will facilitate a discussion on how stakeholders would like to view information and how the metrics can be presented to aid decision making.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech Workshop Associated Activity icon

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    2.2

    Sample of activity 2.2 'Design your metric reports with these guidelines in mind'. Select and design the metric report

    Based on the discussion, the working group will select the most appropriate presentation format and create a rough draft of how the report should look.

    Develop Meaningful Service Metrics to Ensure Business and User Satisfaction

    PHASE 3

    Implement, Track, and Maintain Your Metrics

    Step (3): Implement, Track, and Maintain Your Metrics

    PHASE 1PHASE 2PHASE 3

    1.1

    Derive the Service Metrics

    1.2

    Validate the Metrics

    2.1

    Determine Reporting Format

    3.1

    Select Pilot Metrics

    3.2

    Activate and Maintain Metrics

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Service Level Manager
    • Business Relationship Manager
    • Service Metrics Program Manager

    Activities in this step

    • Determine the first batch of metrics to be implemented as part of the pilot program
    • Create a process to collect and validate data, determine initial targets, and integrate with SLM and BRM functions
    • Present the metric reports to the relevant stakeholders and incorporate the feedback into the metric design
    • Establish a standard process and roll out the implementation of metrics in batches
    • Establish a process to monitor and track the effectiveness of the service metrics program and make adjustments when necessary

    Phase 3 outline

    Associated Activity icon Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 3: Implement, Track, and Maintain Your Metrics

    Proposed Time to Completion (in weeks): 4 weeks
    Step 3.1: Select and Launch Pilot Metrics Step 3.2: Track and Maintain the Metrics
    Start with an analyst kick-off call:
    • Identify metrics that will be presented first to the stakeholders based on urgency or impact of the IT service
    • Determine the process to collect data, select initial targets, and integrate with SLM and BRM functions
    Review findings with analyst:
    • Review the success of metrics and discuss feedback from stakeholders
    • Roll out the metrics implementation to a broader audience
    • Establish roles and timelines for metrics maintenance
    Then complete these activities…
    • Document the first batch of metrics
    • Document the baseline, initial targets
    • Create a plan to integrate with SLM and BRM functions
    Then complete these activities…
    • Create a document that defines how the organization will track and maintain the success of the metrics program
    • Review the metrics program periodically
    With these tools & templates:
    • Metrics Tracking Tool
    With these tools & templates:
    • Metrics Tracking Tool

    Implement, Track, and Maintain the Metrics

    Figure representing 'SLM' and/or 'BRM'. Step 1
    Run your pilot

    Metrics Tracking Tool

    Figure representing 'SLM' and/or 'BRM'. Step 2
    Validate success

    Metrics Tracking Tool

    Figure representing 'SLM' and/or 'BRM'. Step 3
    Implement your metrics program in batches

    Metrics Tracking Tool

    A star.

    Active Service Metrics Program

    Once you have defined the way that you will present the metrics, you are ready to run a pilot with a smaller sample of defined service metrics.

    This allows you to validate your approach and make refinements to the implementation and maintenance processes where necessary, prior to activating all service metrics.

    Track the performance of your service metrics

    Supporting Tool icon 3.1

    The Metrics Tracking Tool will enable you to track goals and success metrics for your service metrics programs. It allows you to set long-term goals and track your results over time.

    There are three sections in this tool:
    1. Metrics Tracking Plan. Identify the metrics to be tracked and their purpose.
    2. Metrics Tracking Actuals. Monitor and track the actual performance of the metrics.
    3. Remediation Tracking. Determine and document the steps that need to be taken to correct a sub-performing metric.
    Sample of Info-Tech's Metrics Tracking Tool.

    Select pilot metrics

    Supporting Tool icon 3.1 30 Minutes

    INPUT: Identified services, Business feedback

    OUTPUT: Services with most urgent need or impact

    Materials: Service catalog or list of identified services

    Participants: BRM, SLM, Business representatives

    To start the implementation of your service metrics program and drive wider adoption, you need to run a pilot using a smaller subset of metrics.

    INSTRUCTIONS

    To determine the sample for the pilot, consider metrics that:

    • Are related to critical business services and functions
    • or
    • Address known/visible pain points for the business
    • or
    • Were designed for supportive or influential stakeholders

    Metrics that meet two or more criteria are ideal for the pilot

    Collect and validate data

    Supporting Tool icon 3.2 1 Hour

    INPUT: Identified metrics

    OUTPUT: A data collection mythology, Metrics tracking

    Materials: Metrics

    Participants: SLM, BRM, Service owner

    You will need to start collection and validation of your identified data in order to calculate the results for your pilot metrics.

    INSTRUCTIONS

    1. Initiate data collection
      • Use the data sources identified during the design phase and initiate the data collection process.
    2. Determine start date
      • If historical data can be retrieved and gathered, determine how far back you want your measurements to start.
    3. Compile data and validate
      • Ensure that the information is accurate and up to date. This will require some level of data validation and audit.
    4. Run the metric
      • Use the defined calculation and source data to generate the metrics result.
    5. Record metrics results
      • Use the metrics tracking sheet to track the actual results.

    Determine initial targets

    Supporting Tool icon 3.3 1 Hour

    INPUT: Historical data/baseline data

    OUTPUT: Realistic initial target for improvement

    Materials: Metrics Tracking Tool

    Participants: BRM, SLM, Service owner

    INSTRUCTIONS

    Identify an initial service objective based on one or more of the following options:

    1. Establish an initial target using historical data and trends of performance.
    2. Establish an initial target based on stakeholder-identified requirements and expectations.
    3. Run the metrics report over a defined period of time and use the baseline level of achievement to establish an initial target.

    The target may not always be a number - it could be a trend. The initial target will be changed after review with stakeholders

    Integrate with SLM and BRM processes

    Supporting Tool icon 3.4 1 Hour

    INPUT: SLM and BRM SOPs or responsibility documentations

    OUTPUT: Integrate service metrics into the SLM/BRM role

    Materials: SLM / BRM reports

    Participants: SLM, BRM, CIO, Program manager, Service manager

    The service metrics program is usually initiated, used, and maintained by the SLM and BRM functions.

    INSTRUCTIONS

    Ensure that the metrics pilot is integrated with those functions by:

    1. Engaging with SLM and BRM functions/resources
      • Identify SLM and BRM resources associated with or working on the services where the metrics are being piloted
      • Obtain their feedback on the metrics/reporting
    2. Integrating with the existing reporting and meeting cycles
      • Ensure the metrics will be calculated and available for discussion at standing meetings and with existing reports
    3. Establishing the metrics review and validation cycle for these metrics
      • Confirm the review and validation period for the metrics in order to ensure they remain valuable and actionable

    Generate reports and present to stakeholders

    Supporting Tool icon 3.5 1 Hour

    INPUT: Identified metrics, Selected presentation format

    OUTPUT: Metrics reports that are ready for distribution

    Materials: Metrics Presentation Format Selection Guide

    Participants: BRM, SLM, CIO, Business representatives

    INSTRUCTIONS

    Once you have completed the calculation for the pilot metrics:

    1. Confirm the report style for the selected metrics (as defined in Phase 2)
    2. Generate the reporting for the pilot metrics
    3. Present the pilot metric reports to the identified BRM and SLM resources who will present the reporting to the stakeholders
    4. Gather feedback from Stakeholders on metrics - results and process
    5. Create and execute remediation plans for any actions identified from the metrics
    6. Initiate the review cycle for metrics (to ensure they retain value)

    Plan the rollout and implementation of the metrics reporting program

    Supporting Tool icon 3.6 1 Hour

    INPUT: Feedback from pilot, Services in batch

    OUTPUT: Systematic implementation of metrics

    Materials: Metrics Tracking Tool

    Participants: BRM, SLM, Program manager

    Upon completion of the pilot, move to start the broader implementation of metrics across the organization:

    INSTRUCTIONS

    1. Identify the service metrics that you will implement. They can be selected based on multiple criteria, including:
      • Organizational area/business unit
      • Service criticality
      • Pain points
      • Stakeholder engagement (detractors, supporters)
    2. Create a rollout plan for implementation in batches, identifying expected launch timelines, owners, targeted stakeholders, and communications plans
    3. Use the implementation plan from the pilot to roll out each batch of service metrics:
      • Collect and validate data
      • Determine target(s)
      • Integrate with BRM and SLM
      • Generate and communicate reports to stakeholders

    Maintain the service metrics

    Supporting Tool icon 3.7 1.5 Hour

    INPUT: Feedback from business stakeholders

    OUTPUT: Modification to individual metrics or to the process

    Materials: Metrics Tracking Tool, Metrics Development Workbook

    Participants: CIO, BRM, SLM, Program manager, Service owner

    Once service metrics and reporting become active, it is necessary to determine the review time frame for your metrics to ensure they remain useful.

    INSTRUCTIONS

    1. Confirm and establish a review time frame with stakeholders (e.g. annually, bi-annually, after organizational or strategic changes).
    2. Meet with stakeholders by the review date to discuss the value of existing metrics and validate:
      • Whether the goals associated with the metrics are still valid
      • If the metric is still necessary
      • If there is a more effective way to present the metrics
    3. Track actions based on review outcomes and update the remediation tracking sheet.
    4. Update tracking sheet with last complete review date.

    Maintain the metrics

    Supporting Tool icon 3.7

    Based on the outcome of the review meeting, decide what needs to be done for each metric, using the following options:

    Add

    A new metric is required or an existing metric needs large-scale changes (example: calculation method or scope).
    Triggers metrics design as shown in phases 1 and 2.

    Change

    A minor change is required to the presentation format or data. Note: a major change in a metric would be performed through the Add option.

    Remove

    The metric is no longer required, and it needs to be removed from reporting and data gathering. A final report date for that metric should be determined.

    Maintain

    The metric is still useful and no changes are required to the metric, its measurement, or how it’s reported.

    Ensuring metrics remain valuable

    VC CASE STUDY
    Industry: Manufacturing | Source: CIO Interview

    Reviewing the value of active metrics

    When the video conferencing service was initially implemented, it was performed as a pilot with a group of executives, and then expanded for use throughout the company. It was understood that prior to seeing the full benefit in cost reduction and increased efficiency and effectiveness, the rate of use and adoption had to be understood.

    The primary service metrics created for the service were based on tracking the number of requests for video conference meetings that were received by the IT organization. This identified the growth in use and could be used in conjunction with financial metrics related to travel to help identify the impact of the service through its growth phase.

    Once the service was adopted, this metric continued to be tracked but no longer showed growth or expanded adoption.

    The service manager was no longer sure this needed to be tracked.

    Key Activity

    The metrics around requests for video conference meetings were reviewed at the annual metrics review meeting with the business. The service manager asked if the need for the metric, the goal of tracking adoption, was still important for the business.

    The discussion identified that the adoption rate was over 80%, higher than anticipated, and that there was no value in continuing to track this metric.

    Based on the discussion, the adoption metrics were discontinued and removed from data gathering and reporting, while a success rate metric was added (how many meetings ran successfully and without issue) to ensure the ongoing value of the video conferencing service.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech Workshop Associated Activity icon

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    Photo of Valence Howden, Senior Manager, CIO Advisory, Info-Tech Research Group.
    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analyst will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech's historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    3.1

    Sample of activity 3.1 'Select pilot metrics'. Select the pilot metrics

    The onsite analyst will help the workshop group select the metrics that should be first implemented based on the urgency and impact of these metrics.

    3.2

    Sample of activity 3.2 'Collect and validate data'. Gather data and set initial targets

    The analyst will help the group create a process to gather data, measure baselines, and set initial targets.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech Workshop Associated Activity icon

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    3.5

    Sample of activity 3.5 'Generate reports and present to stakeholders'. Generate the reports and validate with stakeholders

    The Info-Tech analyst will help the group establish a process to receive feedback from the business stakeholders once the report is generated.

    3.6

    Sample of activity 3.6 'Plan the rollout and implementation of the metrics reporting program'. Implement the service metrics program

    The analyst will facilitate a discussion on how to implement the metrics program across the organization.

    3.7

    Sample of activity 3.7 'Maintain the service metrics'. Track and maintain the metrics program

    Set up a mechanism to ensure the success of the metrics program by assessing process adherence and process validity.

    Insight breakdown

    Insight 1

    Service metrics are critical to ensuring alignment of IT service performance and business service value achievement.

    Insight 2

    Service metrics reinforce positive business and end-user relationships by providing user-centric information that drives responsiveness and consistent service improvement.

    Insight 3

    Poorly designed metrics drive unintended and unproductive behaviors that have negative impacts on IT and produce negative service outcomes.

    Summary of accomplishment

    Knowledge Gained

    • Follow a methodology to identify metrics that are derived from business objectives.
    • Understand the proper presentation format based on stakeholder needs for information.
    • Establish a process to ensure the metrics provided will continue to provide value and aid decision making.

    Processes Optimized

    • Metrics presentation to business stakeholders
    • Metrics maintenance and tracking

    Deliverables Completed

    • Metrics Development Workbook
    • Metrics Presentation Format Selection Guide
    • Metrics Tracking Tool

    Research contributors and experts

    Name Organization
    Joe Evers Joe Evers Consulting
    Glen Notman Associate Partner, Citihub
    David Parker Client Program Manager, eHealth Ontario
    Marianne Doran Collins CIO, The CIO-Suite, LLC
    Chris Kalbfleisch Manager, Service Management, eHealth Ontario
    Joshua Klingenberg BHP Billiton Canada Inc.

    Related Info-Tech research

    Stock image of a menu. Design & Build a User-Facing Service Catalog
    The user-facing service catalog is the go-to place for IT service-related information.
    Stock image of a laptop keyboard. Unleash the True Value of IT by Transforming Into a Service Provider
    Earn your seat at the table and influence business strategy by becoming an IT service provider.

    Bibliography

    Pollock, Bill. “Service Benchmarking and Measurement: Using Metrics to Drive Customer Satisfaction and Profits.” Aberdeen Group. June 2009. http://722consulting.com/ServiceBenchmarkingandMeasurement.pdf

    PwC. “Mega-Trends and Implications.” RMI Discussion. LinkedIn SlideShare. September 2015. http://www.slideshare.net/AnandRaoPwC/mega-trends-and-implications-to-retirement

    PwC. “Healthcare’s new entrants: Who will be the industry’s Amazon.com?” Health Research Institute. April 2014. https://www.pwc.com/us/en/health-industries/healthcare-new-entrants/assets/pwc-hri-new-entrant-chart-pack-v3.pdf

    PwC. “Northern Lights: Where are we now?” PwC Blogs. 2012. http://pwc.blogs.com/files/12.09.06---northern-lights-2--summary.pdf

    PwC. “PwC’s key performance indicators

    Improve Requirements Gathering

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}523|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.4/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $153,578 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 26 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Requirements & Design
    • Parent Category Link: /requirements-and-design
    • Poor requirements are the number one reason that projects fail. Requirements gathering and management has been an ongoing issue for IT professionals for decades.
    • If proper due diligence for requirements gathering is not conducted, then the applications that IT is deploying won’t meet business objectives and will fail to deliver adequate business value.
    • Inaccurate requirements definition can lead to significant amounts of project rework and hurt the organization’s financial performance. It will also create significant damage to the working relationship between IT and the business.
    • Often, business analysts haven’t developed the right competencies to successfully execute requirements gathering processes, even when they are in place.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • To avoid makeshift solutions, an organization needs to gather requirements with the desired future state in mind.
    • Creating a unified set of standard operating procedures is essential for effectively gathering requirements, but many organizations fail to do it.
    • Centralizing governance of requirements processes with a requirements gathering steering committee or requirements gathering center of excellence can bring greater uniformity and cohesion when gathering requirements across projects.
    • Business analysts must be targeted for competency development to ensure that the processes developed above are being successfully executed and the right questions are being asked of project sponsors and stakeholders.

    Impact and Result

    • Enhanced requirements analysis will lead to tangible reductions in cycle time and reduced project overhead.
    • An improvement in requirements analysis will strengthen the relationship between business and IT, as more and more applications satisfy stakeholder needs.
    • More importantly, the applications delivered by IT will meet all of the must-have and at least some of the nice-to-have requirements, allowing end users to successfully execute their day-to-day responsibilities.

    Improve Requirements Gathering Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should invest in optimizing your requirements gathering processes.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Build the target state for the requirements gathering process

    Capture a clear understanding of the target needs for the requirements process.

    • Build a Strong Approach to Business Requirements Gathering – Phase 1: Build the Target State for the Requirements Gathering Process
    • Requirements Gathering SOP and BA Playbook
    • Requirements Gathering Maturity Assessment
    • Project Level Selection Tool
    • Business Requirements Analyst
    • Requirements Gathering Communication Tracking Template

    2. Define the elicitation process

    Develop best practices for conducting and structuring elicitation of business requirements.

    • Build a Strong Approach to Business Requirements Gathering – Phase 2: Define the Elicitation Process
    • Business Requirements Document Template
    • Scrum Documentation Template

    3. Analyze and validate requirements

    Standardize frameworks for analysis and validation of business requirements.

    • Build a Strong Approach to Business Requirements Gathering – Phase 3: Analyze and Validate Requirements
    • Requirements Gathering Documentation Tool
    • Requirements Gathering Testing Checklist

    4. Create a requirements governance action plan

    Formalize change control and governance processes for requirements gathering.

    • Build a Strong Approach to Business Requirements Gathering – Phase 4: Create a Requirements Governance Action Plan
    • Requirements Traceability Matrix
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Improve Requirements Gathering

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Define the Current State and Target State for Requirements Gathering

    The Purpose

    Create a clear understanding of the target needs for the requirements gathering process.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A comprehensive review of the current state for requirements gathering across people, processes, and technology.

    Identification of major challenges (and opportunity areas) that should be improved via the requirements gathering optimization project.

    Activities

    1.1 Understand current state and document existing requirement process steps.

    1.2 Identify stakeholder, process, outcome, and training challenges.

    1.3 Conduct target state analysis.

    1.4 Establish requirements gathering metrics.

    1.5 Identify project levels 1/2/3/4.

    1.6 Match control points to project levels 1/2/3/4.

    1.7 Conduct project scoping and identify stakeholders.

    Outputs

    Requirements Gathering Maturity Assessment

    Project Level Selection Tool

    Requirements Gathering Documentation Tool

    2 Define the Elicitation Process

    The Purpose

    Create best practices for conducting and structuring elicitation of business requirements.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A repeatable framework for initial elicitation of requirements.

    Prescribed, project-specific elicitation techniques.

    Activities

    2.1 Understand elicitation techniques and which ones to use.

    2.2 Document and confirm elicitation techniques.

    2.3 Create a requirements gathering elicitation plan for your project.

    2.4 Build the operating model for your project.

    2.5 Define SIPOC-MC for your selected project.

    2.6 Practice using interviews with business stakeholders to build use case models.

    2.7 Practice using table-top testing with business stakeholders to build use case models.

    Outputs

    Project Elicitation Schedule

    Project Operating Model

    Project SIPOC-MC Sub-Processes

    Project Use Cases

    3 Analyze and Validate Requirements

    The Purpose

    Build a standardized framework for analysis and validation of business requirements.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Policies for requirements categorization, prioritization, and validation.

    Improved project value as a result of better prioritization using the MOSCOW model.

    Activities

    3.1 Categorize gathered requirements for use.

    3.2 Consolidate similar requirements and eliminate redundancies.

    3.3 Practice prioritizing requirements.

    3.4 Build the business process model for the project.

    3.5 Rightsize the requirements documentation template.

    3.6 Present the business requirements document to business stakeholders.

    3.7 Identify testing opportunities.

    Outputs

    Requirements Gathering Documentation Tool

    Requirements Gathering Testing Checklist

    4 Establish Change Control Processes

    The Purpose

    Create formalized change control processes for requirements gathering.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Reduced interjections and rework – strengthened formal evaluation and control of change requests to project requirements.

    Activities

    4.1 Review existing CR process.

    4.2 Review change control process best practices and optimization opportunities.

    4.3 Build guidelines for escalating changes.

    4.4 Confirm your requirements gathering process for project levels 1/2/3/4.

    Outputs

    Requirements Traceability Matrix

    Requirements Gathering Communication Tracking Template

    5 Establish Ongoing Governance for Requirements Gathering

    The Purpose

    Establish governance structures and ongoing oversight for business requirements gathering.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Consistent governance and oversight of the requirements gathering process, resulting in fewer “wild west” scenarios.

    Better repeatability for the new requirements gathering process, resulting in less wasted time and effort at the outset of projects.

    Activities

    5.1 Define RACI for the requirements gathering process.

    5.2 Define the requirements gathering steering committee purpose.

    5.3 Define RACI for requirements gathering steering committee.

    5.4 Define the agenda and cadence for the requirements gathering steering committee.

    5.5 Identify and analyze stakeholders for communication plan.

    5.6 Create communication management plan.

    5.7 Build the action plan.

    Outputs

    Requirements Gathering Action Plan

    Further reading

    Improve Requirements Gathering

    Back to basics: great products are built on great requirements.

    Analyst Perspective

    A strong process for business requirements gathering is essential for application project success. However, most organizations do not take a strategic approach to optimizing how they conduct business analysis and requirements definition.

    "Robust business requirements are the basis of a successful project. Without requirements that correctly articulate the underlying needs of your business stakeholders, projects will fail to deliver value and involve significant rework. In fact, an Info-Tech study found that of projects that fail over two-thirds fail due to poorly defined business requirements.

    Despite the importance of good business requirements to project success, many organizations struggle to define a consistent and repeatable process for requirements gathering. This results in wasted time and effort from both IT and the business, and generates requirements that are incomplete and of dubious value. Additionally, many business analysts lack the competencies and analytical techniques needed to properly execute the requirements gathering process.

    This research will help you get requirements gathering right by developing a set of standard operating procedures across requirements elicitation, analysis, and validation. It will also help you identify and fine-tune the business analyst competencies necessary to make requirements gathering a success."

    – Ben Dickie, Director, Enterprise Applications, Info-Tech Research Group

    Our understanding of the problem

    This Research is Designed For:

    • The IT applications director who has accountability for ensuring that requirements gathering procedures are both effective and efficient.
    • The designated business analyst or requirements gathering professional who needs a concrete understanding of how to execute upon requirements gathering SOPs.

    This Research Will Help You:

    • Diagnose your current state and identify (and prioritize) gaps that exist between your target requirements gathering needs and your current capabilities and processes.
    • Build a requirements gathering SOP that prescribes a framework for requirements governance and technology usage, as well as techniques for elicitation, analysis, and validation.

    This Research Will Also Assist:

    • The business partner/stakeholder who is interested in ways to work with IT to improve upon existing procedures for requirements gathering.
    • Systems analysts and developers who need to understand how business requirements are effectively gathered upstream.

    This Research Will Help Them:

    • Understand the significance and importance of business requirements gathering on overall project success and value alignment.
    • Create rules of engagement for assisting IT with the collection of requirements from the right stakeholders in a timely fashion.

    Executive summary

    Situation

    • Strong business requirements are essential to project success – inadequate requirements are the number one reason that projects fail.
    • Organizations need a consistent, repeatable, and prescriptive set of standard operating procedures (SOPs) that dictate how business requirements gathering should be conducted.

    Complication

    • If proper due diligence for requirements gathering is not conducted, then the applications that IT is deploying won’t meet business objectives, and they will fail to deliver adequate business value.
    • Inaccurate requirements definition can lead to significant amounts of project rework and hurt the organization’s financial performance. It will also damage the relationship between IT and the business.

    Resolution

    • To avoid delivering makeshift solutions (paving the cow path), organizations need to gather requirements with the desired future state in mind. Organizations need to keep an open mind when gathering requirements.
    • Creating a unified set of SOPs is essential for effectively gathering requirements; these procedures should cover not just elicitation, analysis, and validation, but also include process governance and documentation.
    • BAs who conduct requirements gathering must demonstrate proven competencies for stakeholder management, analytical techniques, and the ability to speak the language of both the business and IT.
    • An improvement in requirements analysis will strengthen the relationship between business and IT, as more and more applications satisfy stakeholder needs. More importantly, the applications delivered by IT will meet all of the must-have and at least some of the nice-to-have requirements, allowing end users to execute their day-to-day responsibilities.

    Info-Tech Insight

    1. Requirements gathering SOPs should be prescriptive based on project complexity. Complex projects will require more analytical rigor. Simpler projects can be served by more straightforward techniques like user story development.
    2. Business analysts (BA) can make or break the execution of the requirements gathering process. A strong process still needs to be executed well by BAs with the right blend of skills and knowledge.

    Understand what constitutes a strong business requirement

    A business requirement is a statement that clearly outlines the functional capability that the business needs from a system or application. There are several attributes to look at in requirements:

    Verifiable
    Stated in a way that can be easily tested

    Unambiguous
    Free of subjective terms and can only be interpreted in one way

    Complete
    Contains all relevant information

    Consistent
    Does not conflict with other requirements

    Achievable
    Possible to accomplish with budgetary and technological constraints

    Traceable
    Trackable from inception through to testing

    Unitary
    Addresses only one thing and cannot be decomposed into multiple requirements

    Agnostic
    Doesn’t pre-suppose a specific vendor or product

    Not all requirements will meet all of the attributes.

    In some situations, an insight will reveal new requirements. This requirement will not follow all of the attributes listed above and that’s okay. If a new insight changes the direction of the project, re-evaluate the scope of the project.

    Attributes are context specific.

    Depending on the scope of the project, certain attributes will carry more weight than others. Weigh the value of each attribute before elicitation and adjust as required. For example, verifiable will be a less-valued attribute when developing a client-facing website with no established measuring method/software.

    Build a firm foundation: requirements gathering is an essential step in any project, but many organizations struggle

    Proper requirements gathering is critical for delivering business value from IT projects, but it remains an elusive and perplexing task for most organizations. You need to have a strategy for end-to-end requirements gathering, or your projects will consistently fail to meet business expectations.

    50% of project rework is attributable to problems with requirements. (Info-Tech Research Group)

    45% of delivered features are utilized by end users. (The Standish Group)

    78% of IT professionals believe the business is “usually” or “always” out of sync with project requirements. (Blueprint Software Systems)

    45% of IT professionals admit to being “fuzzy” about the details of a project’s business objectives. (Blueprint Software Systems)

    Requirements gathering is truly an organization-spanning issue, and it falls directly on the IT directors who oversee projects to put prudent SOPs in place for managing the requirements gathering process. Despite its importance, the majority of organizations have challenges with requirements gathering.

    What happens when requirements are no longer effective?

    • Poor requirements can have a very visible and negative impact on deployed apps.
    • IT receives the blame for any project shortcomings or failures.
    • IT loses its credibility and ability to champion future projects.
    • Late projects use IT resources longer than planned.

    Requirements gathering is a core component of the overall project lifecycle that must be given its due diligence

    PMBOK’s Five Phase Project Lifecycle

    Initiate – Plan: Requirements Gathering Lives Here – Execute – Control – Close

    Inaccurate requirements is the 2nd most common cause of project failure (Project Management Institute ‒ Smartsheet).

    Requirements gathering is a critical stage of project planning.

    Depending on whether you take an Agile or Waterfall project management approach, it can be extended into the initiate and execute phases of the project lifecycle.

    Strong stakeholder satisfaction with requirements gathering results in higher satisfaction in other areas

    Organizations that had high satisfaction with requirements gathering were more likely to be highly satisfied with the other areas of IT. In fact, 72% of organizations that had high satisfaction with requirements gathering were also highly satisfied with the availability of IT capacity to complete projects.

    A bar graph measuring % High Satisfaction when projects have High Requirements Gathering vs. Not High Requirements Gathering. The graph shows a substantially higher percentage of high satisfaction on projects with High Requirements Gathering

    Note: High satisfaction was classified as organizations with a score greater or equal to 8. Not high satisfaction was every other organization that scored below 8 on the area questions.

    N=395 organizations from Info-Tech’s CIO Business Vision diagnostic

    Requirements gathering efforts are filled with challenges; review these pitfalls to avoid in your optimization efforts

    The challenges that afflict requirements gathering are multifaceted and often systemic in nature. There isn’t a single cure that will fix all of your requirements gathering problems, but an awareness of frequently encountered challenges will give you a basis for where to consider establishing better SOPs. Commonly encountered challenges include:

    Process Challenges

    • Requirements may be poorly documented, or not documented at all.
    • Elicitation methods may be inappropriate (e.g. using a survey when collaborative whiteboarding is needed).
    • Elicitation methods may be poorly executed.
    • IT and business units may not be communicating requirements in the same terms/language.
    • Requirements that conflict with one another may not be identified during analysis.
    • Requirements cannot be traced from origin to testing.

    Stakeholder Challenges

    • Stakeholders may be unaware of the requirements needed for the ideal solution.
    • Stakeholders may have difficulty properly articulating their desired requirements.
    • Stakeholders may have difficulty gaining consensus on the ideal solution.
    • Relevant stakeholders may not be consulted on requirements.
    • Sign-off may not be received from the proper stakeholders.

    70% of projects fail due to poor requirements. (Info-Tech Research Group)

    Address the root cause of poor requirements to increase project success

    Root Causes of Poor Requirements Gathering:

    • Requirements gathering procedures don’t exist.
    • Requirements gathering procedures exist but aren’t followed.
    • There isn't enough time allocated to the requirements gathering phase.
    • There isn't enough involvement or investment secured from business partners.
    • There is no senior leadership involvement or mandate to fix requirements gathering.
    • There are inadequate efforts put towards obtaining and enforcing sign-off.

    Outcomes of Poor Requirements Gathering:

    • Rework due to poor requirements leads to costly overruns.
    • Final deliverables are of poor quality.
    • Final deliverables are implemented late.
    • Predicted gains from deployed applications are not realized.
    • There are low feature utilization rates by end users.
    • There are high levels of end-user dissatisfaction.
    • There are high levels of project sponsor dissatisfaction.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Requirements gathering is the number one failure point for most development or procurement projects that don’t deliver value. This has been and continues to be the case as most organizations still don't get requirements gathering right. Overcoming organizational cynicism can be a major obstacle when it is time to optimize the requirements gathering process.

    Reduce wasted project work with clarity of business goals and analysis of requirements

    You can reduce the amount of wasted work by making sure you have clear business goals. In fact, you could see an improvement of as much as 50% by going from a low level of satisfaction with clarity of business goals (<2) to a high level of satisfaction (≥5).

    A line graph demonstrating that as the amount of wasted work increases, clarity of business goals satisfaction decreases.

    Likewise, you could see an improvement of as much as 43% by going from a low level of satisfaction with analysis of requirements (less than 2) to a high level of satisfaction (greater than or equal to 5).

    A line graph demonstrating that as the Amount of Wasted Work decreases, the level of satisfaction with analysis of requirements shifts from low to high.

    Note: Waste is measured by the amount of cancelled projects; suboptimal assignment of resources; analyzing, fixing, and re-deploying; inefficiency, and unassigned resources.

    N=200 teams from the Project Portfolio Management diagnostic

    Effective requirements gathering supports other critical elements of project management success

    Good intentions and hard work aren’t enough to make a project successful. As you proceed with a project, step back and assess the critical success factors. Make sure that the important inputs and critical activities of requirements gathering are supporting, not inhibiting, project success.

    1. Streamlined Project Intake
    2. Strong Stakeholder Management
    3. Defined Project Scope
    4. Effective Project Management
    5. Environmental Analysis

    Don’t improvise: have a structured, end-to-end approach for successfully gathering useful requirements

    Creating a unified SOP guide for requirements elicitation, analysis, and validation is a critical step for requirements optimization; it gives your BAs a common frame of reference for conducting requirements gathering.

    • The key to requirements optimization is to establish a strong set of SOPs that provide direction on how your organization should be executing requirements gathering processes. This SOP guide should be a holistic document that walks your BAs through a requirements gathering project from beginning to end.
    • An SOP that is put aside is useless; it must be well communicated to BAs. It should be treated as the veritable manifesto of requirements management in your organization.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Having a standardized approach to requirements management is critical, and SOPs should be the responsibility of a group. The SOP guide should cover all of the major bases of requirements management. In addition to providing a walk-through of the process, an SOP also clarifies requirements governance.

    Leverage Info-Tech’s proven Requirements Gathering Framework as the basis for building requirements processes

    A graphic with APPLICATIONS THAT DELIVER BUSINESS VALUE written in the middle. Three steps are named: Elicit; Analyze; Validate. Around the outer part of the graphic are 4 arrows arranged in a circle, with the labels: Plan; Monitor; Communicate; Manage.

    Info-Tech’s Requirements Gathering Framework is a comprehensive approach to requirements management that can be scaled to any size of project or organization. This framework has been extensively road-tested with our clients to ensure that it balances the needs of IT and business stakeholders to give a holistic, end-to-end approach for requirements gathering. It covers the foundational issues (elicitation, analysis, and validation) and prescribes techniques for planning, monitoring, communicating, and managing the requirements gathering process.

    Don’t forget resourcing: the best requirements gathering process will still fail if you don’t develop BA competencies

    When creating the process for requirements gathering, think about how it will be executed by your BAs, and what the composition of your BA team should look like. A strong BA needs to serve as an effective translator, being able to speak the language of both the business and IT.

    1. To ensure alignment of your BAs to the requirements gathering process, undertake a formal skills assessment to identify areas where analysts are strong, and areas that should be targeted for training and skills development.
    2. Training of BAs on the requirements gathering process and development of intimate familiarity with SOPs is essential; you need to get BAs on the same page to ensure consistency and repeatability of the requirements process.
    3. Consider implementing a formal mentorship and/or job shadowing program between senior and junior BAs. Many of our members report that leveraging senior BAs to bootstrap the competencies of more junior team members is a proven approach to building skillsets for requirements gathering.

    What are some core competencies of a good BA?

    • Strong stakeholder management.
    • Proven track record in facilitating elicitation sessions.
    • Ability to bridge the gulf between IT and the business by speaking both languages.
    • Ability to ask relevant probing questions to uncover latent needs.
    • Experience with creating project operating models and business process diagrams.
    • Ability to set and manage expectations throughout the process.

    Throughout this blueprint, look for the “BA Insight” box to learn how steps in the requirements gathering process relate to the skills needed by BAs to facilitate the process effectively.

    A mid-sized local government overhauls its requirements gathering approach and sees strong results

    CASE STUDY

    Industry

    Government

    Source

    Info-Tech Research Group Workshop

    The Client

    The organization was a local government responsible for providing services to approximately 600,000 citizens in the southern US. Its IT department is tasked with deploying applications and systems (such as HRIS) that support the various initiatives and mandate of the local government.

    The Requirements Gathering Challenge

    The IT department recognized that a strong requirements gathering process was essential to delivering value to its stakeholders. However, there was no codified process in place – each BA unilaterally decided how they would conduct requirements gathering at the start of each project. IT recognized that to enhance both the effectiveness and efficiency of requirements gathering, it needed to put in place a strong, prescriptive set of SOPs.

    The Improvement

    Working with a team from Info-Tech, the IT leadership and BA team conducted a workshop to develop a new set of SOPs that provided clear guidance for each stage of the requirements process: elicitation, analysis, and validation. As a result, business satisfaction and value alignment increased.

    The Requirements Gathering SOP and BA Playbook offers a codified set of SOPs for requirements gathering gave BAs a clear playbook.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    “Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

    Workshop

    “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

    Consulting

    “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Build a Strong Approach to Business Requirements Gathering – project overview

    1. Build the Target State for Requirements Gathering 2. Define the Elicitation Process 3. Analyze and Validate Requirements 4. Create a Requirements Governance Action Plan
    Best-Practice Toolkit

    1.1 Understand the Benefits of Requirements Optimization

    1.2 Determine Your Target State for Requirements Gathering

    2.1 Determine Elicitation Techniques

    2.2 Structure Elicitation Output

    3.1 Create Analysis Framework

    3.2 Validate Business Requirements

    4.1 Create Control Processes for Requirements Changes

    4.2 Build Requirements Governance and Communication Plan

    Guided Implementations
    • Review Info-Tech’s requirements gathering methodology.
    • Assess current state for requirements gathering – pains and challenges.
    • Determine target state for business requirements gathering – areas of opportunity.
    • Assess elicitation techniques and determine best fit to projects and business environment.
    • Review options for structuring the output of requirements elicitation (i.e. SIPOC).
    • Create policies for requirements categorization and prioritization.
    • Establish best practices for validating the BRD with project stakeholders.
    • Discuss how to handle changes to requirements, and establish a formal change control process.
    • Review options for ongoing governance of the requirements gathering process.
    Onsite Workshop Module 1: Define the Current and Target State Module 2: Define the Elicitation Process Module 3: Analyze and Validate Requirements Module 4: Governance and Continuous Improvement Process
    Phase 1 Results: Clear understanding of target needs for the requirements process. Phase 2 Results: Best practices for conducting and structuring elicitation. Phase 3 Results: Standardized frameworks for analysis and validation of business requirements. Phase 4 Results: Formalized change control and governance processes for requirements.

    Workshop overview

    Contact your account representative or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Workshop Day 1 Workshop Day 2 Workshop Day 3 Workshop Day 4 Workshop Day 5
    Activities

    Define Current State and Target State for Requirements Gathering

    • Understand current state and document existing requirement process steps.
    • Identify stakeholder, process, outcome, and reigning challenges.
    • Conduct target state analysis.
    • Establish requirements gathering metrics.
    • Identify project levels 1/2/3/4.
    • Match control points to project levels 1/2/3/4.
    • Conduct project scoping and identify stakeholders.

    Define the Elicitation Process

    • Understand elicitation techniques and which ones to use.
    • Document and confirm elicitation techniques.
    • Create a requirements gathering elicitation plan for your project.
    • Practice using interviews with business stakeholders to build use case models.
    • Practice using table-top testing with business stakeholders to build use case models.
    • Build the operating model for your project

    Analyze and Validate Requirements

    • Categorize gathered requirements for use.
    • Consolidate similar requirements and eliminate redundancies.
    • Practice prioritizing requirements.
    • Rightsize the requirements documentation template.
    • Present the business requirements document (BRD) to business stakeholders.
    • Identify testing opportunities.

    Establish Change Control Processes

    • Review existing CR process.
    • Review change control process best practices & optimization opportunities.
    • Build guidelines for escalating changes.
    • Confirm your requirements gathering process for project levels 1/2/3/4.

    Establish Ongoing Governance for Requirements Gathering

    • Define RACI for the requirements gathering process.
    • Define the requirements gathering governance process.
    • Define RACI for requirements gathering governance.
    • Define the agenda and cadence for requirements gathering governance.
    • Identify and analyze stakeholders for communication plan.
    • Create communication management plan.
    • Build the action plan.
    Deliverables
    • Requirements gathering maturity assessment
    • Project level selection tool
    • Requirements gathering documentation tool
    • Project elicitation schedule
    • Project operating model
    • Project use cases
    • Requirements gathering documentation tool
    • Requirements gathering testing checklist
    • Requirements traceability matrix
    • Requirements gathering communication tracking template
    • Requirements gathering action plan

    Phase 1: Build the Target State for the Requirements Gathering Process

    Phase 1 outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 1: Build the Target State

    Proposed Time to Completion: 2 weeks

    Step 1.1: Understand the Benefits of Requirements Optimization

    Start with an analyst kick off call:

    • Review Info-Tech’s requirements gathering methodology.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Hold a fireside chat.

    With these tools & templates:

    Requirements Gathering SOP and BA Playbook

    Step 1.2: Determine Your Target State for Requirements Gathering

    Review findings with analyst:

    • Assess current state for requirements gathering – pains and challenges.
    • Determine target state for business requirements gathering – areas of opportunity.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Identify your business process model.
    • Define project levels.
    • Match control points to project level.
    • Identify and analyze stakeholders.

    With these tools & templates:

    • Requirements Gathering Maturity Assessment
    • Project Level Selection Tool
    • Business Requirements Analyst job description
    • Requirements Gathering Communication Tracking Template

    Phase 1 Results & Insights:

    Clear understanding of target needs for the requirements process.

    Step 1.1: Understand the Benefits of Requirements Optimization

    Phase 1

    1.1 Understand the Benefits of Requirements Optimization

    1.2 Determine Your Target State for Requirements Gathering

    Phase 2

    2.1 Determine Elicitation Techniques

    2.2 Structure Elicitation Output

    Phase 3

    3.1 Create Analysis Framework

    3.2 Validate Business Requirements

    Phase 4

    4.1 Create Control Processes for Requirements Changes

    4.2 Build Requirements Governance and Communication Plan

    This step will walk you through the following activities:
    • Identifying challenges with requirements gathering and identifying objectives for the workshop.
    This step involves the following participants:
    • Business stakeholders
    • BAs
    Outcomes of this step
    • Stakeholder objectives identified.

    Requirements optimization is powerful, but it’s not free; gauge the organizational capital you’ll need to make it a success

    Optimizing requirements management is not something that can be done in isolation, and it’s not necessarily going to be easy. Improving your requirements will translate into better value delivery, but it takes real commitment from IT and its business partners.

    There are four “pillars of commitment” that will be necessary to succeed with requirements optimization:

    1. Senior Management Organizational Capital
      • Before organizations can establish revised SOPs for requirements gathering, they’ll need a strong champion in senior management to ensure that updated elicitation and sign-off techniques do not offend people. A powerful sponsor can lead to success, especially if they are in the business.
    2. End-User Organizational Capital
      • To overcome cynicism, you need to focus on convincing end users that there is something to be gained from participating in requirements gathering (and the broader process of requirements optimization). Frame the value by focusing on how good requirements mean better apps (e.g. faster, cheaper, fewer errors, less frustration).
    3. Staff Resourcing
      • You can have a great SOP, but if you don’t have the right resources to execute on it you’re going to have difficulty. Requirements gathering needs dedicated BAs (or equivalent staff) who are trained in best practices and can handle elicitation, analysis, and validation successfully.
    4. Dedicated Cycle Time
      • IT and the business both need to be willing to demonstrate the value of requirements optimization by giving requirements gathering the time it needs to succeed. If these parties are convinced by the concept in theory, but still try to rush moving to the development phase, they’re destined for failure.

    Rethink your approach to requirements gathering: start by examining the business process, then tackle technology

    When gathering business requirements, it’s critical not to assume that layering on technology to a process will automatically solve your problems.

    Proper requirements gathering views projects holistically (i.e. not just as an attempt to deploy an application or technology, but as an endeavor to enable new or re-engineered business processes). Neglecting to see requirements gathering in the context of business process enablement leads to failure.

    • Far too often, organizations automate an existing process without putting much thought into finding a better way to do things.
    • Most organizations focus on identifying a series of small improvements to make to a process and realize limited gains.
    • The best way to generate transformational gains is to reinvent how the process should be performed and work backwards from there.
    • You should take a top-down approach and begin by speaking with senior management about the business case for the project and their vision for the target state.
    • You should elicit requirements from the rank-and-file employees while centering the discussion and requirements around senior management’s target state. Don’t turn requirements gathering into a griping session about deficiencies with a current application.

    Leverage Info-Tech’s proven Requirements Gathering Framework as the basis for building requirements processes

    A graphic with APPLICATIONS THAT DELIVER BUSINESS VALUE written in the middle. Three steps are named: Elicit; Analyze; Validate. Around the outer part of the graphic are 4 arrows arranged in a circle, with the labels: Plan; Monitor; Communicate; Manage.

    Info-Tech’s Requirements Gathering Framework is a comprehensive approach to requirements management that can be scaled to any size of project or organization. This framework has been extensively road-tested with our clients to ensure that it balances the needs of IT and business stakeholders to give a holistic, end-to-end approach for requirements gathering. It covers both the foundational issues (elicitation, analysis, and validation) as well as prescribing techniques for planning, monitoring, communicating, and managing the requirements gathering process.

    Requirements gathering fireside chat

    1.1.1 – 45 minutes

    Output
    • Stakeholder objectives
    Materials
    • Whiteboard, markers, sticky notes
    Participants
    • BAs

    Identify the challenges you’re experiencing with requirements gathering, and identify objectives.

    1. Hand out sticky notes to participants, and ask the group to work independently to think of challenges that exist with regards to requirements gathering. (Hint: consider stakeholder challenges, process challenges, outcome challenges, and training challenges.) Ask participants to write their current challenges on sticky notes, and place them on the whiteboard.
    2. As a group, review all sticky notes and group challenges into themes.
    3. For each theme you uncover, work as a group to determine the objective that will overcome these challenges throughout the workshop and write this on the whiteboard.
    4. Discuss how these challenges will be addressed in the workshop.

    Don’t improvise: have a structured, prescriptive end-to-end approach for successfully gathering useful requirements

    Creating a unified SOP guide for requirements elicitation, analysis, and validation is a critical step for requirements optimization; it gives your BAs a common frame of reference for conducting requirements gathering.

    • The key to requirements optimization is to establish a strong set of SOPs that provide direction on how your organization should be executing requirements gathering processes. This SOP guide should be a holistic document that walks your BAs through a requirements gathering project from beginning to end.
    • An SOP that is put aside is useless; it must be well communicated to BAs. It should be treated as the veritable manifesto of requirements management in your organization.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Having a standardized approach to requirements management is critical, and SOPs should be the responsibility of a group. The SOP guide should cover all of the major bases of requirements management. In addition to providing a walk-through of the process, an SOP also clarifies requirements governance.

    Use Info-Tech’s Requirements Gathering SOP and BA Playbook to assist with requirements gathering optimization

    Info-Tech’s Requirements Gathering SOP and BA Playbook template forms the basis of this blueprint. It’s a structured document that you can fill out with defined procedures for how requirements should be gathered at your organization.

    Info-Tech’s Requirements Gathering SOP and BA Playbook template provides a number of sections that you can populate to provide direction for requirements gathering practitioners. Sections provided include: Organizational Context Governance Procedures Resourcing Model Technology Strategy Knowledge Management Elicitation SOPs Analysis SOPs Validation SOPs.

    The template has been pre-populated with an example of requirements management procedures. Feel free to customize it to fit your specific needs.

    Download the Requirements Gathering SOP and BA Playbook template.

    Step 1.2: Determine Your Target State for Requirements Gathering

    Phase 1

    1.1 Understand the Benefits of Requirements Optimization

    1.2 Determine Your Target State for Requirements Gathering

    Phase 2

    2.1 Determine Elicitation Techniques

    2.2 Structure Elicitation Output

    Phase 3

    3.1 Create Analysis Framework

    3.2 Validate Business Requirements

    Phase 4

    4.1 Create Control Processes for Requirements Changes

    4.2 Build Requirements Governance and Communication Plan

    This step will walk you through the following activities:
    • Conduct a current and target state analysis.
    • Identify requirements gathering business process model.
    • Establish requirements gathering performance metrics.
    • Define project levels – level 1/2/3/4.
    • Match control points to project level.
    • Conduct initial brainstorming on the project.
    This step involves the following participants:
    • BAs
    Outcomes of this step:
    • Requirements gathering maturity summary.
    • Requirements gathering business process model.
    • Identification of project levels.
    • Identification of control points.

    Plan for requirements gathering

    The image is the Requirements Gathering Framework from earlier slides, but with all parts of the graphic grey-out, except for the arrows containing Plan and Monitor, at the top.

    Establishing an overarching plan for requirements governance is the first step in building an SOP. You must also decide who will actually execute the requirements gathering processes, and what technology they will use to accomplish this. Planning for governance, resourcing, and technology is something that should be done repeatedly and at a higher strategic level than the more sequential steps of elicitation, analysis, and validation.

    Establish your target state for requirements gathering processes to have a cogent roadmap of what needs to be done

    Visualize how you want requirements to be gathered in your organization. Do not let elements of the current process restrict your thinking.

    • First, articulate the impetus for optimizing requirements management and establish clear goals.
    • Use these goals to drive the target state.

    For example:

    • If the goal is to improve the accuracy of requirements, then restructure the validation process.
    • If the goal is to improve the consistency of requirements gathering, then create SOPs or use electronic templates and tools.

    Refrain from only making small changes to improve the existing process. Think about the optimal way to structure the requirements gathering process.

    Define the attributes of a good requirement to help benchmark the type of outputs that you’re looking for

    Attributes of Good Requirements

    Verifiable – It is stated in a way that can be tested.

    Unambiguous – It is free of subjective terms and can only be interpreted in one way.

    Complete – It contains all relevant information.

    Consistent – It does not conflict with other requirements.

    Achievable – It is possible to accomplish given the budgetary and technological constraints.

    Traceable – It can tracked from inception to testing.

    Unitary – It addresses only one thing and cannot be decomposed into multiple requirements.

    Accurate – It is based on proven facts and correct information.

    Other Considerations:

    Organizations can also track a requirement owner, rationale, priority level (must have vs. nice to have), and current status (approved, tested, etc.).

    Info-Tech Insight

    Requirements must be solution agnostic – they should focus on the underlying need rather than the technology required to satisfy the need as it can be really easy to fall into the technology solution trap.

    Use Info-Tech’s Requirements Gathering Maturity Assessment tool to help conduct current and target state analysis

    Use the Requirements Gathering Maturity Assessment tool to help assess the maturity of your requirements gathering function in your organization, and identify the gaps between the current state and the target state. This will help focus your organization's efforts in closing the gaps that represent high-value opportunities.

    • On tab 2. Current State, use the drop-down responses to provide the answer that best matches your organization, where 1= Strongly disagree and 5 = Strongly agree. On tab 3. Target State, answer the same questions in relation to where your organization would like to be.
    • Based on your responses, tab 4. Maturity Summary will display a visual of the gap between the current and target state.

    Conduct a current and target state analysis

    1.2.1 – 1 hour

    Complete the Requirements Gathering Maturity Assessment tool to define your target state, and identify the gaps in your current state.

    Input
    • Current and target state maturity rating
    Output
    • Requirements gathering maturity summary
    Materials
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    Participants
    • BAs
    1. For each component of requirements gathering, write out a series of questions to evaluate your current requirements gathering practices. Use the Requirements Gathering Maturity Assessment tool to assist you in drafting questions.
    2. Review the questions in each category, and agree on a rating from 1-5 on their current maturity: 1= Strongly disagree and 5 = Strongly agree. (Note: it will likely be very rare that they would score a 5 in any category, even for the target state.)
    3. Once the assigned categories have been completed, have groups present their assessment to all, and ensure that there is consensus. Once consensus has been reached, input the information into the Current State tab of the tool to reveal the overall current state of maturity score for each category.
    4. Now that the current state is complete, go through each category and define the target state goals.
    5. Document any gaps or action items that need to be addressed.

    Example: Conduct a current and target state analysis

    The Requirements Gathering Maturity Assessment - Target State, with example data inputted.

    Select the project-specific KPIs that will be used to track the value of requirements gathering optimization

    You need to ensure your requirements gathering procedures are having the desired effect and adjust course when necessary. Establishing an upfront list of key performance indicators that will be benchmarked and tracked is a crucial step.

    • Without following up on requirements gathering by tracking project metrics and KPIs, organizations will not be able to accurately gauge if the requirements process re-engineering is having a tangible, measurable effect. They will also not be able to determine what changes (if any) need to be made to SOPs based on project performance.
    • This is a crucial step that many organizations overlook. Creating a retroactive list of KPIs is inadequate, since you must benchmark pre-optimization project metrics in order to assess and isolate the value generated by reducing errors and cycle time and increasing value of deployed applications.

    Establish requirements gathering performance metrics

    1.2.2 – 30 minutes

    Input
    • Historical metrics
    Output
    • Target performance metrics
    Materials
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Paper
    Participants
    • BAs
    1. Identify the following information for the last six months to one year:
      1. Average number of reworks to requirements.
      2. Number of change requests.
      3. Percent of feature utilization by end users.
      4. User adoption rate.
      5. Number of breaches in regulatory requirements.
      6. Percent of final deliverables implemented on time.
      7. End-user satisfaction score (if possible).
    2. As a group, look at each metric in turn and set your target metrics for six months to one year for each of these categories.

    Document the output from this exercise in section 2.2 of the Requirements Gathering SOP and BA Playbook.

    Visualize your current and target state process for requirements gathering with a business process model

    A business process model (BPM) is a simplified depiction of a complex process. These visual representations allow all types of stakeholders to quickly understand a process, how it affects them, and enables more effective decision making. Consider these areas for your model:

    Stakeholder Analysis

    • Identify who the right stakeholders are
    • Plan communication
    • Document stakeholder responsibilities in a RACI

    Elicitation Techniques

    • Get the right information from stakeholders
    • Document it in the appropriate format
    • Define business need
    • Enterprise analysis

    Documentation

    • How are outputs built?
    • Process flows
    • Use cases
    • Business rules
    • Traceability matrix
    • System requirements

    Validation & Traceability

    • Make sure requirements are accurate and complete
    • Trace business needs to requirements

    Managing Requirements

    • Organizing and prioritizing
    • Gap analysis
    • Managing scope
    • Communicating
    • Managing changes

    Supporting Tools

    • Templates to standardize
    • Checklists
    • Software to automate the process

    Your requirements gathering process will vary based on the project level

    It’s important to determine the project levels up front, as each project level will have a specific degree of elicitation, analysis, and validation that will need to be completed. That being said, not all organizations will have four levels.

    Level 4

    • Very high risk and complexity.
    • Projects that result in a transformative change in the way you do business. Level 4 projects affect all lines of business, multiple technology areas, and have significant costs and/or risks.
    • Example: Implement ERP

    Level 3

    • High risk and complexity.
    • Projects that affect multiple lines of business and have significant costs and/or risks.
    • Example: Implement CRM

    Level 2

    • Medium risk and complexity.
    • Projects with broader exposure to the business that present a moderate level of risk to business operations.
    • Example: Deploy Office 365

    Level 1

    • Low risk and complexity.
    • Routine/straightforward projects with limited exposure to the business and low risk of negative business impact.
    • Example: SharePoint Update

    Use Info-Tech’s Project Level Selection Tool to classify your project level and complexity

    1.3 Project Level Selection Tool

    The Project Level Selection Tool will classify your projects into four levels, enabling you to evaluate the risk and complexity of a particular project and match it with an appropriate requirements gathering process.

    Project Level Input

    • Consider the weighting criteria for each question and make any needed adjustments to better reflect how your organization values each of the criterion.
    • Review the option levels 1-4 for each of the six questions, and make any modifications necessary to better suit your organization.
    • Review the points assigned to each of the four buckets for each of the six questions, and make any modifications needed.

    Project Level Selection

    • Use this tab to evaluate the project level of each new project.
    • To do so, answer each of the questions in the tool.

    Define project levels – Level 1/2/3/4

    1.2.3 – 1 hour

    Input
    • Project level assessment criteria
    Output
    • Identification of project levels
    Materials
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    Participants
    • BAs

    Define the project levels to determine the appropriate requirements gathering process for each.

    1. Begin by asking participants to review the six criteria for assessing project levels as identified in the Project Level Selection Tool. Have participants review the list and ensure agreement around the factors. Create a chart on the board using Level 1, Level 2, Level 3, and Level 4 as column headings.
    2. Create a row for each of the chosen factors. Begin by filling in the chart with criteria for a level 4 project: What constitutes a level 4 project according to these six factors?
    3. Repeat the exercise for Level 3, Level 2, and Level 1. When complete, you should have a chart that defines the four project levels at your organization.
    4. Input this information into the tool, and ask participants to review the weighting factors and point allocations and make modifications where necessary.
    5. Input the details from one of the projects participants had selected prior to the workshop beginning and determine its project level. Discuss whether this level is accurate, and make any changes needed.

    Document the output from this exercise in section 2.3 of the Requirements Gathering SOP and BA Playbook.

    Define project levels

    1.2.3 – 1 hour

    Category Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1
    Scope of Change Full system update Full system update Multiple modules Minor change
    Expected Duration 12 months + 6 months + 3-6 months 0-3 months
    Impact Enterprise-wide, globally dispersed Enterprise-wide Department-wide Low users/single division
    Budget $1,000,000+ $500,000-1,000,000 $100,000-500,000 $0-100,000
    Services Affected Mission critical, revenue impacting Mission critical, revenue impacting Pervasive but not mission critical Isolated, non-essential
    Confidentiality Yes Yes No No

    Define project levels

    1.2.3 – 1 hour

    The tool is comprised of six questions, each of which is linked to at least one type of project risk.

    Using the answers provided, the tool will calculate a level for each risk category. Overall project level is a weighted average of the individual risk levels, based on the importance weighting of each type of risk set by the project manager.

    This tool is an excerpt from Info-Tech’s exhaustive Project Level Assessment Tool.

    The image shows the Project Level Tool, with example data filled in.

    Build your initial requirements gathering business process models: create different models based on project complexity

    1.2.4 – 30 minutes

    Input
    • Current requirements gathering process flow
    Output
    • Requirements gathering business process model
    Materials
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    Participants
    • BAs

    Brainstorm the ideal target business process flows for your requirements gathering process (by project level).

    1. As a group, create a process flow on the whiteboard that covers the entire requirements gathering lifecycle, incorporating the feedback from exercise 1.2.1. Draw the process with input from the entire group.
    2. After the process flow is complete, compare it to the best practice process flow on the following slide. You may want to create different process flows based on project level (i.e. a process model for Level 1 and 2 requirements gathering, and a process model for how to collect requirements for Level 3 and 4). As you work through the blueprint, revisit and refine these models – this is the initial brainstorming!

    Document the output from this exercise in section 2.4 of the Requirements Gathering SOP and BA Playbook.

    Example: requirements gathering business process model

    An example of the requirements gathering business process model. The model depicts the various stages of the requirements gathering process.

    Develop your BA team to accelerate collecting, analyzing, and translating requirements

    Having an SOP is important, but it should be the basis for training the people who will actually execute the requirements gathering process. Your BA team is critical for requirements gathering – they need to know the SOPs in detail, and you need to have a plan for recruiting those with an excellent skill set.

    • The designated BA(s) for the project have responsibility for end-to-end requirements management – they are responsible for executing the SOPs outlined in this blueprint, including elicitation, analysis, and validation of requirements during the project.
    • Designated BAs must work collaboratively with their counterparts in the business and IT (e.g. developer teams or procurement professionals) to ensure that the approved requirements are met in a timely and cost-effective manner.

    The ideal candidates for requirements gathering are technically savvy analysts (but not necessarily computer science majors) from the business who are already fluent with the business’ language and cognizant of the day-to-day challenges that take place. Organizationally, these BAs should be in a group that bridges IT and the business (such as an RGCOE or PMO) and be specialists rather than generalists in the requirements management space.

    A BA resourcing strategy is included in the SOP. Customize it to suit your needs.

    "Make sure your people understand the business they are trying to provide the solution for as well if not better than the business folks themselves." – Ken Piddington, CIO, MRE Consulting

    Use Info-Tech’s Business Requirements Analyst job description template for sourcing the right talent

    1.4 Business Requirements Analyst

    If you don’t have a trained group of in-house BAs who can execute your requirements gathering process, consider sourcing the talent from internal candidates or calling for qualified applicants. Our Business Requirements Analyst job description template can help you quickly get the word out.

    • Sometimes, you will have a dedicated set of BAs, and sometimes you won’t. In the latter case, the template covers:
      • Job Title
      • Description of Role
      • Responsibilities
      • Target Job Skills
      • Target Job Qualifications
    • The template is primarily designed for external hiring, but can also be used to find qualified internal candidates.

    Info-Tech Deliverable
    Download the Business Requirements Analyst job description template.

    Standardizing process begins with establishing expectations

    CASE STUDY

    Industry Government

    Source Info-Tech Workshop

    Challenge

    A mid-sized US municipality was challenged with managing stakeholder expectations for projects, including the collection and analysis of business requirements.

    The lack of a consistent approach to requirements gathering was causing the IT department to lose credibility with department level executives, impacting the ability of the team to engage project stakeholders in defining project needs.

    Solution

    The City contracted Info-Tech to help build an SOP to govern and train all BAs on a consistent requirements gathering process.

    The teams first set about establishing a consistent approach to defining project levels, defining six questions to be asked for each project. This framework would be used to assess the complexity, risk, and scope of each project, thereby defining the appropriate level of rigor and documentation required for each initiative.

    Results

    Once the project levels were defined, the team established a formalized set of steps, tools, and artifacts to be created for each phase of the project. These tools helped the team present a consistent approach to each project to the stakeholders, helping improve credibility and engagement for eliciting requirements.

    The project level should set the level of control

    Choose a level of control that facilitates success without slowing progress.

    No control Right-sized control Over-engineered control
    Final deliverable may not satisfy business or user requirements. Control points and communication are set at appropriate stage-gates to allow for deliverables to be evaluated and assessed before proceeding to the next phase. Excessive controls can result in too much time spent on stage-gates and approvals, which creates delays in the schedule and causes milestones to be missed.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Throughout the requirements gathering process, you need checks and balances to ensure that the projects are going according to plan. Now that we know our stakeholder, elicitation, and prioritization processes, we will set up the control points for each project level.

    Plan your communication with stakeholders

    Determine how you want to receive and distribute messages to stakeholders.

    Communication Milestones Audience Artifact Final Goal
    Project Initiation Project Sponsor Project Charter Communicate Goals and Scope of Project
    Elicitation Scheduling Selected Stakeholders (SMEs, Power Users) Proposed Solution Schedule Elicitation Sessions
    Elicitation Follow-Up Selected Stakeholders Elicitation Notes Confirm Accuracy of Notes
    First Pass Validation Selected Stakeholders Consolidated Requirements Validate Aggregated Requirements
    Second Pass Validation Selected Stakeholders Prioritized Requirements Validate Requirements Priority
    Eliminated Requirements Affected Stakeholders Out of Scope Requirements Affected Stakeholders Understand Impact of Eliminated Requirements
    Solution Selection High Authority/Expertise Stakeholders Modeled Solutions Select Solution
    Selected Solution High Authority/Expertise Stakeholders and Project Sponsor Requirements Package Communicate Solution
    Requirements Sign-Off Project Sponsor Requirements Package Obtain Sign-Off

    Setting control points – approvals and sign-offs

    # – Control Point: A decision requiring specific approval or sign-off from defined stakeholders involved with the project. Control points result in accepted or rejected deliverables/documents.

    A – Plan Approval: This control point requires a review of the requirements gathering plan, stakeholders, and elicitation techniques.

    B – Requirements Validation: This control point requires a review of the requirements documentation that indicates project and product requirements.

    C – Prioritization Sign-Off: This requires sign-off from the business and/or user groups. This might be sign-off to approve a document, prioritization, or confirm that testing is complete.

    D – IT or Peer Sign-Off: This requires sign-off from IT to approve technical requirements or confirm that IT is ready to accept a change.

    Match control points to project level and identify these in your requirements business process models

    1.2.5 – 45 minutes

    Input
    • Activity 1.2.4 business process diagram
    Output
    • Identify control points
    Materials
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes
    Participants
    • Business stakeholders
    • BAs

    Define all of the key control points, required documentation, and involved stakeholders.

    1. On the board, post the initial business process diagram built in exercise 1.2.4. Have participants suggest appropriate control points. Write the control point number on a sticky note and place it where the control point should be.
    2. Now that we have identified the control points, consider each control point and define who will be involved in each one, who provides the approval to move forward, the documentation required, and the overall goal.

    Document the output from this exercise in section 6.1 of the Requirements Gathering SOP and BA Playbook.

    A savvy BA should clarify and confirm project scope prior to embarking on requirements elicitation

    Before commencing requirements gathering, it’s critical that your practitioners have a clear understanding of the initial business case and rationale for the project that they’re supporting. This is vital for providing the business context that elicitation activities must be geared towards.

    • Prior to commencing the requirements gathering phase, the designated BA should obtain a clear statement of scope or initial project charter from the project sponsor. It’s also advisable for the BA to have an in-person meeting with the project sponsor(s) to understand the overarching strategic or tactical impetus for the project. This initial meeting should be less about eliciting requirements and more about understanding why the project is moving forward, and the business processes it seeks to enable or re-engineer (the target state).
    • During this meeting, the BA should seek to develop a clear understanding of the strategic rationale for why the project is being undertaken (the anticipated business benefits) and why it is being undertaken at this time. If the sponsor has any business process models they can share, this would be a good time to review them.

    During requirements gathering, BAs should steer clear of solutions and focus on capturing requirements. Focus on traceable, hierarchical, and testable requirements. Focusing on solution design means you are out of requirements mode.

    Identify constraints early and often, and ensure that they are adequately communicated to project sponsors and end users

    Constraints come in many forms (i.e. financial, regulatory, and technological). Identifying these constraints prior to entering requirements gathering enables you to remain alert; you can separate what is possible from what is impossible, and set stakeholder expectations accordingly.

    • Most organizations don’t inventory their constraints until after they’ve gathered requirements. This is dangerous, as clients may inadvertently signal to end users or stakeholders that an infeasible requirement is something they will pursue. As a result, stakeholders are disappointed when they don’t see it materialize.
    • Organizations need to put advanced effort into constraint identification and management. Too much time is wasted pursuing requirements that aren't feasible given existing internal (e.g. budgets and system) and external (e.g. legislative or regulatory) constraints.
    • Organizations need to manage diverse stakeholders for requirements analysis. Communication will not always be solely with internal teams, but also with suppliers, customers, vendors, and system integrators.

    Stakeholder management is a critical aspect of the BA’s role. Part of the BA’s responsibility is prioritizing solutions and demonstrating to stakeholders the level of effort required and the value attained.

    A graphic, with an arrow running down the left side, pointing downward, which is labelled Constraint Malleability. On the right side of the arrow are three rounded arrows, stacked. The top arrow is labelled Legal/Regulatory Constraints, the second is labelled System/Technical Constraints and the third is labelled Stakeholder Constraints

    Conduct initial brainstorming on the scope of a selected enterprise application project (real or a sample of your choice)

    1.2.6 – 30 minutes

    Input
    • Project details
    Output
    • Initial project scoping
    Materials
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    Participants
    • Business stakeholders

    Begin the requirements gathering process by conducting some initial scoping on why we are doing the project, the goals, and the constraints.

    1. Share the project intake form/charter with each member of the group, and give them a few minutes to read over the project details.
    2. On the board write the project topic and three sub-topics:
      • Why does the business want this?
      • What do you want customers (end users) to be able to do?
      • What are the constraints?
    3. As a group, brainstorm answers to each of these questions and write them on the board.

    Example: Conduct initial brainstorming on the project

    Image shows an example for initial brainstorming on a project. The image shows the overall idea, Implement CRM, with question bubbles emerging out of it, and space left blank to brainstorm the answers to those questions.

    Identify stakeholders that must be consulted during the elicitation part of the process; get a good spectrum of subject matter experts (SMEs)

    Before you can dive into most elicitation techniques, you need to know who you’re going to speak with – not all stakeholders hold the same value.

    There are two broad categories of stakeholders:

    Customers: Those who ask for a system/project/change but do not necessarily use it. These are typically executive sponsors, project managers, or interested stakeholders. They are customers in the sense that they may provide the funding or budget for a project, and may have requests for features and functionality, but they won’t have to use it in their own workflows.

    Users: Those who may not ask for a system but must use it in their routine workflows. These are your end users, those who will actually interact with the system. Users don’t necessarily have to be people – they can also be other systems that will require inputs or outputs from the proposed solution. Understand their needs to best drive more granular functional requirements.

    "The people you need to make happy at the end of the day are the people who are going to help you identify and prioritize requirements." – Director of IT, Municipal Utilities Provider

    Need a hand with stakeholder identification? Leverage Info-Tech’s Stakeholder Planning Tool to catalog and prioritize the stakeholders your BAs will need to contact during the elicitation phase.

    Exercise: Identify and analyze stakeholders for the application project prior to beginning formal elicitation

    1.2.7 – 45 minutes

    Input
    • List of stakeholders
    Output
    • Stakeholder analysis
    Materials
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes
    Participants
    • BAs

    Practice the process for identifying and analyzing key stakeholders for requirements gathering.

    1. As a group, generate a complete list of the project stakeholders. Consider who is involved in the problem and who will be impacted by the solution, and record the names of these stakeholders/stakeholder groups on a sticky note. Categories include:
      1. Who is the project sponsor?
      2. Who are the user groups?
      3. Who are the project architects?
      4. Who are the specialty stakeholders (SMEs)?
      5. Who is your project team?
    2. Now that you’ve compiled a complete list, review each user group and indicate their level of influence against their level of involvement in the project to create a stakeholder power map by placing their sticky on a 2X2 grid.
    3. At the end of the day, record this list in the Requirements Gathering Communication Tracking Template.

    Use Info-Tech’s Requirements Gathering Communication Tracking Template

    1.5 Requirements Gathering Communication Tracking Template

    Use the Requirements Gathering Communication Tracking Template for structuring and managing ongoing communications among key requirements gathering implementation stakeholders.

    An illustration of the Stakeholder Power Map Template tab of the Requirements Gathering Communication Tracking Template

    Use the Stakeholder Power Map tab to:

    • Identify the stakeholder's name and role.
    • Identify their position on the power map using the drop-down menu.
    • Identify their level of support.
    • Identify resisters' reasons for resisting as: unwilling, unable, and/or unknowing.
    • Identify which committees they currently sit on, and which they will sit on in the future state.
    • Identify any key objections the stakeholder may have.

    Use the Communication Management Plan tab to:

    • Identify the vehicle/communication medium (status update, meeting, training, etc.).
    • Identify the audience for the communication.
    • Identify the purpose for communication.
    • Identify the frequency.
    • Identify who is responsible for the communication.
    • Identify how the communication will be distributed, and the level of detail.

    Right-size your investments in requirements management technology; sometimes the “suite spot” isn’t necessary

    Recording and analyzing requirements needs some kind of tool, but don’t overinvest in a dedicated suite if you can manage with a more inexpensive solution (such as Word, Excel, and/or Visio). Top-tier solutions may be necessary for an enterprise ERP deployment, but you can use a low-cost solution for low-level productivity application.

    • Many companies do things in the wrong order. Organizations need to right-size the approach that they take to recording and analyzing requirements. Taking the suite approach isn’t always better – often, inputting the requirements into Word or Excel will suffice. An RM suite won’t solve your problems by itself.
    • If you’re dealing with strategic approach or calculated approach projects, their complexity likely warrants a dedicated RM suite that can trace system dependencies. If you’re dealing with primarily elementary or fundamental approach projects, use a more basic tool.

    Your SOP guide should specify the technology platform that your analysts are expected to use for initial elicitation as well as analysis and validation. You don’t want them to use Word if you’ve invested in a full-out IBM RM solution.

    The graphic shows a pyramid shape next to an arrow, pointing up. The arrow is labelled Project Complexity. The pyramid includes three text boxes, reading (from top to bottom) Dedicated RM Suite; RM Module in PM Software; and Productivity APP (Word/Excel/Visio)

    If you need to opt for a dedicated suite, these vendors should be strong contenders in your consideration set

    Dedicated requirements management suites are a great (although pricey) way to have full control over recording, analysis, and hierarchical categorization of requirements. Consider some of the major vendors in the space if Word, Excel, and Visio aren’t suitable for you.

    • Before you purchase a full-scale suite or module for requirements management, ensure that the following contenders have been evaluated for your requirements gathering technology strategy:
      • Micro Focus Requirements Management
      • IBM Requisite Pro
      • IBM Rational DOORS
      • Blueprint Requirements Management
      • Jama Software
      • Polarion Software (a Siemens Company)

    A mid-sized consulting company overhauls its requirement gathering software to better understand stakeholder needs

    CASE STUDY

    Industry Consulting

    Source Jama Software

    Challenge

    ArcherPoint is a leading Microsoft Partner responsible for providing business solutions to its clients. Its varied customer base now requires a more sophisticated requirements gathering software.

    Its process was centered around emailing Word documents, creating versions, and merging issues. ArcherPoint recognized the need to enhance effectiveness, efficiency, and accuracy of requirements gathering through a prescriptive set of elicitation procedures.

    Solution

    The IT department at ArcherPoint recognized that a strong requirements gathering process was essential to delivering value to stakeholders. It needed more scalable and flexible requirements gathering software to enhance requirements traceability. The company implemented SaaS solutions that included traceability and seamless integration features.

    These features reduced the incidences of repetition, allowed for tracing of requirements relationships, and ultimately led to an exhaustive understanding of stakeholders’ needs.

    Results

    Projects are now vetted upon an understanding of the business client’s needs with a thorough requirements gathering collection and analysis.

    A deeper understanding of the business needs also allows ArcherPoint to better understand the roles and responsibilities of stakeholders. This allows for the implementation of structures and policies which makes the requirements gathering process rigorous.

    There are different types of requirements that need to be gathered throughout the elicitation phase

    Business Requirements

    • Higher-level statements of the goals, objectives, or needs of the enterprise.
    • Describe the reasons why a project has been initiated, the objectives that the project will achieve, and the metrics that will be used to measure its success.
    • Business requirements focus on the needs of the organization as a whole, not stakeholders within it.
    • Business requirements provide the foundation on which all further requirements analysis is based:
      • Ultimately, any detailed requirements must map to business requirements. If not, what business need does the detailed requirement fulfill?

    Stakeholder Requirements

    • Statements of the needs of a particular stakeholder or class of stakeholders, and how that stakeholder will interact with a solution.
    • Stakeholder requirements serve as a bridge between business requirements and the various classes of solution requirements.
    • When eliciting stakeholder requirements, other types of detailed requirements may be identified. Record these for future use, but keep the focus on capturing the stakeholders’ needs over detailing solution requirements.

    Solution options or preferences are not requirements. Be sure to identify these quickly to avoid being forced into untimely discussions and sub-optimal solution decisions.

    Requirement types – a quick overview (continued)

    Solution Requirements: Describe the characteristics of a solution that meet business requirements and stakeholder requirements. They are frequently divided into sub-categories, particularly when the requirements describe a software solution:

    Functional Requirements

    • Describe the behavior and information that the solution will manage. They describe capabilities the system will be able to perform in terms of behaviors or operations, i.e. specific information technology application actions or responses.
    • Functional requirements are not detailed solution specifications; rather, they are the basis from which specifications will be developed.

    Non-Functional Requirements

    • Capture conditions that do not directly relate to the behavior or functionality of the solution, but rather describe environmental conditions under which the solution must remain effective or qualities that the systems must have. These can include requirements related to capacity, speed, security, availability, and the information architecture and presentation of the user interface.
    • Non-functional requirements often represent constraints on the ultimate solution. They tend to be less negotiable than functional requirements.
    • For IT solutions, technical requirements would fit in this category.
    Info-Tech Insight

    Remember that solution requirements are distinct from solution specifications; in time, specifications will be developed from the requirements. Don’t get ahead of the process.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    1.2.1 Conduct current and target state analysis

    An analyst will facilitate a discussion to assess the maturity of your requirements gathering process and identify any gaps in the current state.

    1.2.2 Establish requirements gathering performance metrics

    Speak to an analyst to discuss and determine key metrics for measuring the effectiveness of your requirements gathering processes.

    1.2.4 Identify your requirements gathering business process model

    An analyst will facilitate a discussion to determine the ideal target business process flow for your requirements gathering.

    1.2.3; 1.2.5 Define control levels and match control points

    An analyst will assist you with determining the appropriate requirements gathering approach for different project levels. The discussion will highlight key control points and define stakeholders who will be involved in each one.

    1.2.6; 1.2.7 Conduct initial scoping and identify key stakeholders

    An analyst will facilitate a discussion to highlight the scope of the requirements gathering optimization project as well as identify and analyze key stakeholders in the process.

    Phase 2: Define the Elicitation Process

    Phase 2 outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 2: Define the Elicitation Process

    Proposed Time to Completion: 2 weeks

    Step 2.1: Determine Elicitation Techniques

    Start with an analyst kick off call:

    • Understand and assess elicitation techniques.
    • Determine best fit to projects and business environment.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Understand different elicitation techniques.
    • Record the approved elicitation techniques.
    Step 2.2: Structure Elicitation Output

    Review findings with analyst:

    • Review options for structuring the output of requirements elicitation.
    • Build the requirements gathering operating model.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Build use case model.
    • Use table-top testing to build use case models.
    • Build the operating model.

    With these tools & templates:

    • Business Requirements Document Template
    • Scrum Documentation Template
    Phase 2 Results & Insights:
    • Best practices for conducting and structuring elicitation.

    Step 2.1: Determine Elicitation Techniques

    Phase 1

    1.1 Understand the Benefits of Requirements Optimization

    1.2 Determine Your Target State for Requirements Gathering

    Phase 2

    2.1 Determine Elicitation Techniques

    2.2 Structure Elicitation Output

    Phase 3

    3.1 Create Analysis Framework

    3.2 Validate Business Requirements

    Phase 4

    4.1 Create Control Processes for Requirements Changes

    4.2 Build Requirements Governance and Communication Plan

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Understand requirements elicitation techniques.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • BAs
    • Business stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • Select and record best-fit elicitation techniques.

    Eliciting requirements is all about effectively creating the initial shortlist of needs the business has for an application

    The image is the Requirements Gathering Framework, shown earlier. All parts of the framework are greyed-out, except for the arrow containing the word Elicit in the center of the image, with three bullet points beneath it that read: Prepare; Conduct; Confirm.

    The elicitation phase is where the BAs actually meet with project stakeholders and uncover the requirements for the application. Major tasks within this phase include stakeholder identification, selecting elicitation techniques, and conducting the elicitation sessions. This phase involves the most information gathering and therefore requires a significant amount of time to be done properly.

    Good requirements elicitation leverages a strong elicitation framework and executes the right elicitation techniques

    A mediocre requirements practitioner takes an order taker approach to elicitation: they elicit requirements by showing up to a meeting with the stakeholder and asking, “What do you want?” This approach frequently results in gaps in requirements, as most stakeholders cannot free-form spit out an accurate inventory of their needs.

    A strong requirements practitioner first decides on an elicitation framework – a mechanism to anchor the discussion about the business requirements. Info-Tech recommends using business process modelling (BPM) as the most effective framework. The BA can now work through several key questions:

    • What processes will this application need to support?
    • What does the current process look like?
    • How could we improve the process?
    • In a target state process map, what are the key functional requirements necessary to support this?

    The second key element to elicitation is using the right blend of elicitation techniques: the tactical approach used to actually collect the requirements. Interviews are the most popular means, but focus groups, JAD sessions, and observational techniques can often yield better results – faster. This section will touch on BPM/BPI as an elicitation framework, then do deep dive on different elicitation techniques.

    The elicitation phase of most enterprise application projects follows a similar four-step approach

    Prepare

    Stakeholders must be identified, and elicitation frameworks and techniques selected. Each technique requires different preparation. For example, brainstorming requires ground rules; focus groups require invitations, specific focus areas, and meeting rooms (perhaps even cameras). Look at each of these techniques and discuss how you would prepare.

    Conduct

    A good elicitor has the following underlying competencies: analytical thinking, problem solving, behavioral characteristics, business knowledge, communication skills, interaction skills, and proficiency in BA tools. In both group and individual elicitation techniques, interpersonal proficiency and strong facilitation is a must. A good BA has an intuitive sense of how to manage the flow of conversations, keep them results-oriented, and prevent stakeholder tangents or gripe sessions.

    Document

    How you document will depend on the technique you use. For example, recording and transcribing a focus group is probably a good idea, but you still need to analyze the results and determine the actual requirements. Use cases demand a software tool – without one, they become cumbersome and unwieldy. Consider how you would document the results before you choose the technique. Some analysts prefer to use solutions like OneNote or Evernote for capturing the raw initial notes, others prefer pen and paper: it’s what works best for the BA at hand.

    Confirm

    Review the documentation with your stakeholder and confirm the understanding of each requirement via active listening skills. Revise requirements as necessary. Circulating the initial notes of a requirements interview or focus group is a great practice to get into – it ensures jargon and acronyms are correctly captured, and that nothing has been lost in the initial translation.

    BPM is an extremely useful framework for framing your requirements elicitation discussions

    What is BPM? (Source: BPMInstitute.org)

    BPMs can take multiple forms, but they are created as visual process flows that depict a series of events. They can be customized at the discretion of the requirements gathering team (swim lanes, legends, etc.) based on the level of detail needed from the input.

    When to use them?

    BPMs can be used as the basis for further process improvement or re-engineering efforts for IT and applications projects. When the requirements gathering process owner needs to validate whether or not a specific step involved in the process is necessary, BPM provides the necessary breakdown.

    What’s the benefit?

    Different individuals absorb information in a variety of ways. Visual representations of a process or set of steps tend to be well received by a large sub-set of individuals, making BPMs an effective analysis technique.

    This related Info-Tech blueprint provides an extremely thorough overview of how to leverage BPM and process improvement approaches.

    Use a SIPOC table to assist with zooming into a step in a BPM to help define requirements

    Build a Sales Report
    • Salesforce
    • Daily sales results
    • Sales by product
    • Sales by account rep
    • Receive customer orders
    • Process invoices
    • GL roll-up
    • Sales by region
    • Sales by rep
    • Director of Sales
    • CEO
    • Report is accurate
    • Report is timely
    • Balance to GL
    • Automated email notification

    Source: iSixSigma

    Example: Extract requirements from a BPM for a customer service solution

    Look at an example for a claims process, and focus on the Record Claim task (event).

    Task Input Output Risks Opportunities Condition Sample Requirements
    Record Claim Customer Email Case Record
    • An agent accidentally misses the email and the case is not submitted.
    • The contents of the email are not properly ported over into the case for the claim.
    • The claim is routed to the wrong recipient within the claims department.
    • There is translation risk when the claim is entered in another language from which it is received.
    • Reduce the time to populate a customer’s claim information into the case.
    • Automate the data capture and routing.
    • Pre-population of the case with the email contents.
    • Suggested routing based on the nature of the case.
    • Multi-language support.

    Business:

    • The system requires email-to-case functionality.

    Non-Functional:

    • The cases must be supported in multiple languages.
    • Case management requires Outlook integration.

    Functional:

    • The case must support the following information:
    • Title; Customer; Subject; Case Origin; Case Type; Owner; Status; Priority
    • The system must pre-populate the claims agent based on the nature of the case.

    The image is an excerpt from a table, with the title Claims Process at the top. The top row is labelled Customer Service, and includes a textbox that reads Record Claim. The bottom row is labelled Claims, and includes a textbox that reads Manage Claim. A downward-pointing arrow connects the two textboxes.

    Identify the preferred elicitation techniques in your requirements gathering SOP: outline order of operations

    Conducting elicitation typically takes the greatest part of the requirements management process. During elicitation, the designated BA(s) should be reviewing documentation, and conducting individual and group sessions with key stakeholders.

    • When eliciting requirements, it’s critical that your designated BAs use multiple techniques; relying only on stakeholder interviews while neglecting to conduct focus groups and joint whiteboarding sessions will lead to trouble.
    • Avoid makeshift solutions by focusing on target state requirements, but don’t forget about the basic user needs. These can often be neglected because one party assumes that the other already knows about them.
    • The SOP guide should provide your BAs with a shortlist of recommended/mandated elicitation techniques based on business scenarios (examples in this section). Your SOP should also suggest the order in which BAs use the techniques for initial elicitation. Generally, document review comes first, followed by group, individual, and observational techniques.

    Elicitation is an iterative process – requirements should be refined in successive steps. If you need more information in the analysis phases, don’t be afraid to go back and conduct more elicitation.

    Understand different elicitation techniques

    2.1.1 – 1 hour

    Input
    • Elicitation techniques
    Output
    • Elicitation technique assessment
    Materials
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Paper
    Participants
    • BAs
    1. For this exercise, review the following elicitation techniques: observation, document review, surveys, focus groups, and interviews. Use the material in the next slides to brainstorm around the following questions:
      1. What types of information can the technique be used to collect?
      2. Why would you use this technique over others?
      3. How will you prepare to use the technique?
      4. How will you document the technique?
      5. Is this technique suitable for all projects?
      6. When wouldn’t you use it?
    2. Have each group present their findings from the brainstorming to the group.

    Document any changes to the elicitation techniques in section 4.0 of the Requirements Gathering SOP and BA Playbook.

    Understand different elicitation techniques – Interviews

    Technique Description Assessment and Best Practices Stakeholder Effort BA Effort
    Structured One-on-One Interview In a structured one-on-one interview, the BA has a fixed list of questions to ask the stakeholder and follows up where necessary. Structured interviews provide the opportunity to quickly home in on areas of concern that were identified during process mapping or group elicitation techniques. They should be employed with purpose, i.e. to receive specific stakeholder feedback on proposed requirements or to help identify systemic constraints. Generally speaking, they should be 30 minutes or less. Low Medium
    Unstructured One-on-One Interview In an unstructured one-on-one interview, the BA allows the conversation to flow free form. The BA may have broad themes to touch on but does not run down a specific question list. Unstructured interviews are most useful for initial elicitation, when brainstorming a draft list of potential requirements is paramount. Unstructured interviews work best with senior stakeholders (sponsors or power users), since they can be time consuming if they’re applied to a large sample size. It’s important for BAs not to stifle open dialogue and allow the participants to speak openly. They should be 60 minutes or less. Medium Low
    Info-Tech Insight

    Interviews should be used with high-value targets. Those who receive one-on-one face time can help generate good requirements, as well as allow effective communication around requirements at a later point (i.e. during the analysis and validation phases).

    Understand the diverse approaches for interviews

    Use a clear interview approach to guide the preparation, facilitation styles, participants, and interview schedules you manage for a specific project.

    Depending on your stakeholder audience and interview objectives, apply one or more of the following approaches to interviews.

    Interview Approaches

    • Unstructured
    • Semi-structured
    • Structured

    The Benefits of Interviews

    Fosters direct engagement

    IT is able to hear directly from stakeholders about what they are looking to do with a solution and the level of functionality that they expect from it.

    Offers greater detail

    With interviews, a greater degree of insight can be gained by leveraging information that wouldn’t be collected through traditional surveys. Face-to-face interactions provide thorough answers and context that helps inform requirements.

    Removes ambiguity

    Face-to-face interactions allow opportunities for follow-up around ambiguous answers. Clarify what stakeholders are looking for and expect in a project.

    Enables stakeholder management

    Interviews are a direct line of communication with a project stakeholder. They provide input and insight, and help to maintain alignment, plan next steps, and increase awareness within the IT organization.

    Select an interview structure based on project objectives and staff types

    Consider stakeholder types and characteristics, in conjunction with the best way to maximize time, when selecting which of the three interview structures to leverage during the elicitation phase of requirements gathering.

    Structured Interviews

    • Interviews conducted using this structure are modelled after the typical Q&A session.
    • The interviewer asks the participant a variety of closed-ended questions.
    • The participant’s response is limited to the scope of the question.

    Semi-Structured Interviews

    • The interviewer may prepare a guide, but it acts as more of an outline.
    • The goal of the interview is to foster and develop conversation.
    • Participants have the ability to answer questions on broad topics without compromising the initial guide.

    Unstructured Interviews

    • The interviewer may have a general interview guide filled with open-ended questions.
    • The objective of the questions is to promote discussion.
    • Participants may discuss broader themes and topics.

    Select the best interview approach

    Review the following questions to determine what interview structure you should utilize. If you answer the question with “Yes,” then follow the corresponding recommendations for the interview elements.

    Question Structure Type Facilitation Technique # of Participants
    Do you have to interview multiple participants at once because of time constraints? Semi-structured Discussion 1+
    Does the business or stakeholders want you to ask specific questions? Structured Q&A 1
    Have you already tried an unsuccessful survey to gather information? Semi-structured Discussion 1+
    Are you utilizing interviews to understand the area? Unstructured Discussion 1+
    Do you need to gather requirements for an immediate project? Structured Q&A 1+

    Decisions to make for interviews

    Interviews should be used with high-value targets. Those who receive one-on-one face time can help generate good requirements and allow for effective communication around requirements during the analysis and validation stages.

    Who to engage?

    • Individuals with an understanding of the project scope, constraints and considerations, and high-level objectives.
    • Project stakeholders from across different functional units to solicit a varied set of requirement inputs.

    How to engage?

    • Approach selected interview candidate(s) with a verbal invitation to participate in the requirements gathering process for [Project X].
    • Take the initiative to book time in the candidate’s calendar. Include in your calendar invitation a description of the preparation required for the interview, the anticipated outputs, and a brief timeline agenda for the interview itself.

    How to drive participant engagement?

    • Use introductory interview questions to better familiarize yourself with the interviewee and to create an environment in which the individual feels welcome and at ease.
    • Once acclimatized, ensure that you hold the attention of the interviewee by providing further probing, yet applicable, interview questions.

    Manage each point of the interaction in the interview process

    Interviews generally follow the same workflow regardless of which structure you select. You must manage the process to ensure that the interview runs smoothly and results in an effective gathering requirements process.

    1. Prep Schedule
      • Recommended Actions
        • Send an email with a proposed date and time for the meeting.
        • Include an overview of what you will be discussing.
        • Mention if other people will be joining (if group interview).
    2. Meeting Opening
      • Recommended Actions
        • Provide context around the meeting’s purpose and primary focal points.
        • Let interviewee(s) know how long the interview will last.
        • Ask if they have any blockers that may cause the meeting to end early.
    3. Meeting Discussion
      • Recommended Actions
        • Ask questions and facilitate discussion in accordance with the structure you have selected.
        • Ensure that the meeting’s dialogue is being either recorded using written notes (if possible) or a voice recorder.
    4. Meeting Wrap-Up
      • Recommended Actions
        • Provide a summary of the big findings and what was agreed upon.
        • Outline next steps or anything else you will require from the participant.
        • Let the interviewee(s) know that you will follow up with interview notes, and will require feedback from them.
    5. Meeting Follow-Up
      • Recommended Actions
        • Send an overview of what was covered and agreed upon during the interview.
        • Show the mock-ups of your work based on the interview, and solicit feedback.
        • Give the interviewee(s) the opportunity to review your notes or recording and add value where needed.

    Solve the problem before it occurs with interview troubleshooting techniques

    The interview process may grind to a halt due to challenging situations. Below are common scenarios and corresponding troubleshooting techniques to get your interview back on track.

    Scenario Technique
    Quiet interviewee Begin all interviews by asking courteous and welcoming questions. This technique will warm the interviewee up and make them feel more comfortable. Ask prompting questions during periods of silence in the interview. Take note of the answers provided by the interviewee in your interview guide, along with observations and impact statements that occur throughout the duration of the interview process.
    Disgruntled interviewee Avoid creating a hostile environment by eliminating the interviewee’s perception that you are choosing to focus on issues that the interviewee feels will not be resolved. Ask questions to contextualize the issue. For example, ask why they feel a particular way about the issue, and determine whether they have valid concerns that you can resolve.
    Interviewee has issues articulating their answer Encourage the interviewee to use a whiteboard or pen and paper to kick start their thought process. Make sure you book a room with these resources readily available.

    Understand different elicitation techniques – Observation

    Technique Description Assessment and Best Practices Stakeholder Effort BA Effort
    Casual Observation The process of observing stakeholders performing tasks where the stakeholders are unaware they are being observed. Capture true behavior through observation of stakeholders performing tasks without informing them they are being observed. This information can be valuable for mapping business process; however, it is difficult to isolate the core business activities from unnecessary actions. Low Medium
    Formal Observation The process of observing stakeholders performing tasks where the stakeholders are aware they are being observed. Formal observation allows BAs to isolate and study the core activities in a business process because the stakeholder is aware they are being observed. Stakeholders may become distrusting of the BA and modify their behavior if they feel their job responsibilities or job security are at risk Low Medium

    Info-Tech Insight

    Observing stakeholders does not uncover any information about the target state. Be sure to use contextual observation in conjunction with other techniques to discover the target state.

    Understand different elicitation techniques – Surveys

    Technique Description Assessment and Best Practices Stakeholder Effort BA Effort
    Closed-Response Survey A survey that has fixed responses for each answer. A Likert-scale (or similar measures) can be used to have respondents evaluate and prioritize possible requirements. Closed response surveys can be sent to large groups and used to quickly gauge user interest in different functional areas. They are easy for users to fill out and don’t require a high investment of time. However, their main deficit is that they are likely to miss novel requirements not listed. As such, closed response surveys are best used after initial elicitation or brainstorming to validate feature groups. Low Medium
    Open-Response Survey A survey that has open-ended response fields. Questions are fixed, but respondents are free to populate the field in their own words. Open-response surveys take longer to fill out than closed, but can garner deeper insights. Open-response surveys are a useful supplement (and occasionally replacement) for group elicitation techniques, like focus groups, when you need to receive an initial list of requirements from a broad cross-section of stakeholders. Their primary shortcoming is the analyst can’t immediately follow up on interesting points. However, they are particularly useful for reaching stakeholders who are unavailable for individual one-on-ones or group meetings. Low Medium

    Info-Tech Insight

    Surveys can be useful mechanisms for initial drafting of raw requirements (open-response) and gauging user interest in proposed requirements or feature sets (closed-response). However, they should not be the sole focus of your elicitation program due to lack of interactivity and two-way dialogue with the BA.

    Be aware: Know the implications of leveraging surveys

    What are surveys?

    Surveys take a sample population’s written responses for data collection. Survey respondents can identify themselves or choose to remain anonymous. Anonymity removes the fear of repercussions for giving critical responses to sensitive topics.

    Who needs to be involved?

    Participants of a survey include the survey writer, respondent(s), and results compiler. There is a moderate amount of work that comes from both the writer and compiler, with little work involved on the end of the respondent.

    What are the benefits?

    The main benefit of surveys is their ability to reach large population groups and segments without requiring personal interaction, thus saving money. Surveys are also very responsive and can be created and modified rapidly to address needs as they arise on an on-going basis.

    When is it best to employ a survey method?

    Surveys are most valuable when completed early in the requirements gathering stage.

    Intake and Scoping → Requirements Gathering → Solution Design → Development/ Procurement → Implementation/ Deployment

    When a project is announced, develop surveys to gauge what users consider must-have, should-have, and could-have requirements.

    Use surveys to profile the demand for specific requirements.

    It is often difficult to determine if requirements are must haves or should haves. Surveys are a strong method to assist in narrowing down a wide range of requirements.

    • If all survey respondents list the same requirement, then that requirement is a must have.
    • If no participants mention a requirement, then that requirement is not likely to be important to project success.
    • If the results are scattered, it could be that the organization is unsure of what is needed.

    Are surveys worth the time and effort? Most of the time.

    Surveys can generate insights. However, there are potential barriers:

    • Well-constructed surveys are difficult to make – asking the right questions without being too long.
    • Participants may not take surveys seriously, giving non-truthful or half-hearted answers.

    Surveys should only be done if the above barriers can easily be overcome.

    Scenario: Survey used to gather potential requirements

    Scenario

    There is an unclear picture of the business needs and functional requirements for a solution.

    Survey Approach

    Use open-ended questions to allow respondents to propose requirements they see as necessary.

    Sample questions

    • What do you believe _______ (project) should include to be successful?
    • How can _______ (project) be best made for you?
    • What do you like/dislike about ________ (process that the project will address)?

    What to do with your results

    Take a step back

    If you are using surveys to elicit a large number of requirements, there is probably a lack of clear scope and vision. Focus on scope clarification. Joint development sessions are a great technique for defining your scope with SMEs.

    Moving ahead

    • Create additional surveys. Additional surveys can help narrow down the large list of requirements. This process can be reiterated until there is a manageable number of requirements.
    • Move onto interviews. Speak directly with the users to get a grasp of the importance of the requirements taken from surveys.

    Employ survey design best practices

    Proper survey design determines how valuable the responses will be. Review survey principles released by the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

    Provide context

    Include enough detail to contextualize questions to the employee’s job duties.

    Where necessary:

    • Include conditions
    • Timeline considerations
    • Additional pertinent details

    Give clear instructions

    When introducing a question identify if it should be answered by giving one answer, multiple answers, or a ranking of answers.

    Avoid IT jargon

    Ensure the survey’s language is easily understood.

    When surveying colleagues from the business use their own terms, not IT’s.

    E.g. laptops vs. hardware

    Saying “laptops” is more detailed and is a universal term.

    Use ranges

    Recommended:

    In a month your Outlook fails:

    • 1-3 times
    • 4-7 times
    • 7+ times

    Not Recommended:

    Your Outlook fails:

    • Almost never
    • Infrequently
    • Frequently
    • Almost always

    Keep surveys short

    Improve responses and maintain stakeholder interest by only including relevant questions that have corresponding actions.

    Recommended: Keep surveys to ten or less prompts.

    Scenario: Survey used to narrow down requirements

    Scenario

    There is a large list of requirements and the business is unsure of which ones to further pursue.

    Survey Approach

    Use closed-ended questions to give degrees of importance and rank requirements.

    Sample questions

    • How often do you need _____ (requirement)?
      • 1-3 times a week; 4-6 times a week; 7+ times a week
    • Given the five listed requirements below, rank each requirement in order of importance, with 1 being the most important and 5 being the least important.
    • On a scale from 1-5, how important is ________ (requirement)?
      • 1 – Not important at all; 2 – Would provide minimal benefit; 3 – Would be nice to have; 4 – Would provide substantial benefit; 5 – Crucial to success

    What to do with your results

    Determine which requirements to further explore

    Avoid simply aggregating average importance and using the highest average as the number-one priority. Group the highest average importance requirements to be further explored with other elicitation techniques.

    Moving ahead

    The group of highly important requirements needs to be further explored during interviews, joint development sessions, and rapid development sessions.

    Scenario: Survey used to discover crucial hidden requirements

    Scenario

    The business wanted a closer look into a specific process to determine if the project could be improved to better address process issues.

    Survey Approach

    Use open-ended questions to allow employees to articulate very specific details of a process.

    Sample questions

    • While doing ________ (process/activity), what part is the most frustrating to accomplish? Why?
    • Is there any part of ________ (process/activity) that you feel does not add value? Why?
    • How would you improve _________ (process/activity)?

    What to do with your results

    Set up prototyping

    Prototype a portion with the new requirement to see if it meets the user’s needs. Joint application development and rapid development sessions pair developers and users together to collaboratively build a solution.

    Next steps

    • Use interviews to begin solution mapping. Speak to SMEs and the users that the requirement would affect. Understand how to properly incorporate the discovered requirement(s) into the solution.
    • Create user stories. User stories allow developers to step into the shoes of the users. Document the user’s requirement desires and their reason for wanting it. Give those user stories to the developers.

    Explore mediums for survey delivery

    Online

    Free online surveys offer quick survey templates but may lack customization. Paid options include customizable features. Studies show that most participants find web-based surveys more appealing, as web surveys tend to have a higher rate of completion.

    Potential Services (Not a comprehensive list)

    SurveyMonkey – free and paid options

    Good Forms – free options

    Ideal for:

    • Low complexity surveys
    • High complexity surveys
    • Quick responses
    • Low cost (free survey options)

    Paper

    Paper surveys offer complete customizability. However, paper surveys take longer to distribute and record, and are also more expensive to administer.

    Ideal for:

    • Low complexity surveys
    • High complexity surveys
    • Quick responses
    • Low cost

    Internally-developed

    Internally-developed surveys can be distributed via the intranet or email. Internal surveys offer the most customization. Cost is the creator’s time, but cost can be saved on distribution versus paper and paid online surveys.

    Ideal for:

    • Low complexity surveys
    • High complexity surveys
    • Quick responses
    • Low cost (if created quickly)

    Understand different elicitation techniques – Focus Groups

    Technique Description Assessment and Best Practices Stakeholder Effort BA Effort
    Focus Group Focus groups are sessions held between a small group (typically ten individuals or less) and an experienced facilitator who leads the conversation in a productive direction. Focus groups are highly effective for initial requirements brainstorming. The best practice is to structure them in a cross-functional manner to ensure multiple viewpoints are represented, and the conversation doesn’t become dominated by one particular individual. Facilitators must be wary of groupthink in these meetings (i.e. the tendency to converge on a single POV). Medium Medium
    Workshop Workshops are larger sessions (typically ten people or more) that are led by a facilitator, and are dependent on targeted exercises. Workshops may be occasionally decomposed into smaller group sessions. Workshops are highly versatile: they can be used for initial brainstorming, requirement prioritization, constraint identification, and business process mapping. Typically, the facilitator will use exercises or activities (such as whiteboarding, sticky note prioritization, role-playing, etc.) to get participants to share and evaluate sets of requirements. The main downside to workshops is a high time commitment from both stakeholders and the BA. Medium High

    Info-Tech Insight

    Group elicitation techniques are most useful for gathering a wide spectrum of requirements from a broad group of stakeholders. Individual or observational techniques are typically needed for further follow-up and in-depth analysis with critical power users or sponsors.

    Conduct focus groups and workshops

    There are two specific types of group interviews that can be utilized to elicit requirements: focus groups and workshops. Understand each type’s strengths and weaknesses to determine which is better to use in certain situations.

    Focus Groups Workshops
    Description
    • Small groups are encouraged to speak openly about topics with guidance from a facilitator.
    • Larger groups are led by a facilitator to complete target exercises that promote hands-on learning.
    Strengths
    • Highly effective for initial requirements brainstorming.
    • Insights can be explored in depth.
    • Any part of the requirements gathering process can be done in a workshop.
    • Use of activities can increase the learning beyond simple discussions.
    Weaknesses
    • Loudest voice in the room can induce groupthink.
    • Discussion can easily veer off topic.
    • Extremely difficult to bring together such a large group for extended periods of time.
    Facilitation Guidance
    • Make sure the group is structured in a cross-functional manner to ensure multiple viewpoints are represented.
    • If the group is too large, break the members into smaller groups. Try putting together members who would not usually interact.

    Solution mapping and joint review sessions should be used for high-touch, high-rigor BPM-centric projects

    Technique Description Assessment and Best Practices Stakeholder Effort BA Effort
    Solution Mapping Session A one-on-one session to outline business processes. BPM methods are used to write possible target states for the solution on a whiteboard and to engineer requirements based on steps in the model. Solution mapping should be done with technically savvy stakeholders with a firm understanding of BPM methodologies and nomenclature. Generally, this type of elicitation method should be done with stakeholders who participated in tier one elicitation techniques who can assist with reverse-engineering business models into requirement lists. Medium Medium
    Joint Requirements Review Session This elicitation method is sometimes used as a last step prior to moving to formal requirements analysis. During the review session, the rough list of requirements is vetted and confirmed with stakeholders. A one-on-one (or small group) requirements review session gives your BAs the opportunity to ensure that what was recorded/transcribed during previous one-on-ones (or group elicitation sessions) is materially accurate and representative of the intent of the stakeholder. This elicitation step allows you to do a preliminary clean up of the requirements list before entering the formal analysis phase. Low Low

    Info-Tech Insight

    Solution mapping and joint requirements review sessions are more advanced elicitation techniques that should be employed after preliminary techniques have been utilized. They should be reserved for technically sophisticated, high-value stakeholders.

    Interactive whiteboarding and joint development sessions should be leveraged for high-rigor BPM-based projects

    Technique Description Assessment and Best Practices Stakeholder Effort BA Effort
    Interactive White- boarding A group session where either a) requirements are converted to BPM diagrams and process flows, or b) these flows are reverse engineered to distil requirement sets. While the focus of workshops and focus groups is more on direct requirements elicitation, interactive whiteboarding sessions are used to assist with creating initial solution maps (or reverse engineering proposed solutions into requirements). By bringing stakeholders into the process, the BA benefits from a greater depth of experience and access to SMEs. Medium Medium
    Joint Application Development (JAD) JAD sessions pair end-user teams together with developers (and BA facilitators) to collect requirements and begin mapping and developing prototypes directly on the spot. JAD sessions fit well with organizations that use Agile processes. They are particularly useful when the overall project scope is ambiguous; they can be used for project scoping, requirements definition, and initial prototyping. JAD techniques are heavily dependent on having SMEs in the room – they should preference knowledge power users over the “rank and file.” High High

    Info-Tech Insight

    Interactive whiteboarding should be heavily BPM-centric, creating models that link requirements to specific workflow activities. Joint development sessions are time-consuming but create greater cohesion and understanding between BAs, developers, and SMEs.

    Rapid application development sessions add some Agile aspects to requirements elicitation

    Technique Description Assessment and Best Practices Stakeholder Effort BA Effort
    Rapid Application Development A form of prototyping, RAD sessions are akin to joint development sessions but with greater emphasis on back-and-forth mock-ups of the proposed solution. RAD sessions are highly iterative – requirements are gathered in sessions, developers create prototypes offline, and the results are validated by stakeholders in the next meeting. This approach should only be employed in highly Agile-centric environments. High High

    For more information specific to using the Agile development methodology, refer to the project blueprint Implement Agile Practices That Work.

    The role of the BA differs with an Agile approach to requirements gathering. A traditional BA is a subset of the Agile BA, who typically serves as product owner. Agile BAs have elevated responsibilities that include bridging communication between stakeholders and developers, prioritizing and detailing the requirements, and testing solutions.

    Overview of JAD and RDS techniques (Part 1)

    Use the following slides to gain a thorough understanding of both JAD and rapid development sessions (RDS) to decide which fits your project best.

    Joint Application Development Rapid Development Sessions
    Description JAD pairs end users and developers with a facilitator to collect requirements and begin solution mapping to create an initial prototype. RDS is an advanced approach to JAD. After an initial meeting, prototypes are developed and validated by stakeholders. Improvements are suggested by stakeholders and another prototype is created. This process is iterated until a complete solution is created.
    Who is involved? End users, SMEs, developers, and a facilitator (you).
    Who should use this technique? JAD is best employed in an Agile organization. Agile organizations can take advantage of the high amount of collaboration involved. RDS requires a more Agile organization that can effectively and efficiently handle impromptu meetings to improve iterations.
    Time/effort versus value JAD is a time/effort-intensive activity, requiring different parties at the same time. However, the value is well worth it. JAD provides clarity for the project’s scope, justifies the requirements gathered, and could result in an initial prototype. RDS is even more time/effort intensive than JAD. While it is more resource intensive, the reward is a more quickly developed full solution that is more customized with fewer bugs.

    Overview of JAD and RDS techniques (Part 2)

    Joint Application Development

    Timeline

    Projects that use JAD should not expect dramatically quicker solution development. JAD is a thorough look at the elicitation process to make sure that the right requirements are found for the final solution’s needs. If done well, JAD eliminates rework.

    Engagement

    Employees vary in their project engagement. Certain employees leverage JAD because they care about the solution. Others are asked for their expertise (SMEs) or because they perform the process often and understand it well.

    Implications

    JAD’s thorough process guarantees that requirements gathering is done well.

    • All requirements map back to the scope.
    • SMEs are consulted throughout the duration of the process.
    • Prototyping is only done after final solution mapping is complete.

    Rapid Development Sessions

    Timeline

    Projects that use RDS can either expect quicker or slower requirements gathering depending on the quality of iteration. If each iteration solves a requirement issue, then one can expect that the solution will be developed fairly rapidly. If the iterations fail to meet requirements the process will be quite lengthy.

    Engagement

    Employees doing RDS are typically very engaged in the project and play a large role in helping to create the solution.

    Implications

    RDS success is tied to the organization’s ability to collaborate. Strong collaboration will lead to:

    • Fewer bugs as they are eliminated in each iteration.
    • A solution that is highly customized to meet the user’s needs.

    Poor collaboration will lead to RDS losing its full value.

    When is it best to use JAD?

    JAD is best employed in an Agile organization for application development and selection. This technique best serves relatively complicated, large-scale projects that require rapid or sequential iterations on a prototype or solution as a part of requirements gathering elicitation. JAD effectuates each step in the elicitation process well, from initial elicitation to narrowing down requirements.

    When tackling a project type you’ve never attempted

    Most requirement gathering professionals will use their experience with project type standards to establish key requirements. Avoid only relying on standards when tackling a new project type. Apply JAD’s structured approach to a new project type to be thorough during the elicitation phase.

    In tandem with other elicitation techniques

    While JAD is an overarching requirements elicitation technique, it should not be the only one used. Combine the strengths of other elicitation techniques for the best results.

    When is it best to use RDS?

    RDS is best utilized when one, but preferably both, of the below criteria is met.

    When the scope of the project is small to medium sized

    RDS’ strengths lie in being able to tailor-make certain aspects of the solution. If the solution is too large, tailor-made sections are impossible as multiple user groups have different needs or there is insufficient resources. When a project is small to medium sized, developers can take the time to custom make sections for a specific user group.

    When most development resources are readily available

    RDS requires developers spending a large amount of time with users, leaving less time for development. Having developers at the ready to take on users’ improvement maintains the effectiveness of RDS. If the same developer who speaks to users develops the entire iteration, the process would be slowed down dramatically, losing effectiveness.

    Techniques to compliment JAD/RDS

    1. Unstructured conversations

    JAD relies on unstructured conversations to clarify scope, gain insights, and discuss prototyping. However, a structure must exist to guarantee that all topics are discussed and meetings are not wasted.

    2. Solution mapping and interactive white-boarding

    JAD often involves visually illustrating how high-level concepts connect as well as prototypes. Use solution mapping and interactive whiteboarding to help users and participants better understand the solution.

    3. Focus groups

    Having a group development session provides all the benefits of focus groups while reducing time spent in the typically time-intensive JAD process.

    Plan how you will execute JAD

    Before the meeting

    1. Prepare for the meeting

    Email all parties a meeting overview of topics that will be discussed.

    During the meeting

    2. Discussion

    • Facilitate the conversation according to what is needed (e.g. skip scope clarification if it is already well defined).
    • Leverage solution mapping and other visual aids to appeal to all users.
    • Confirm with SMEs that requirements will meet the users’ needs.
    • Discuss initial prototyping.

    After the meeting

    3. Wrap-up

    • Provide a key findings summary and set of agreements.
    • Outline next steps for all parties.

    4. Follow-up

    • Send the mock-up of any agreed upon prototype(s).
    • Schedule future meetings to continue prototyping.

    JAD provides a detail-oriented view into the elicitation process. As a facilitator, take detailed notes to maximize the outputs of JAD.

    Plan how you will execute RDS

    Before the meeting

    1. Prepare for the meeting

    • Email all parties a meeting overview.
    • Ask employees and developers to bring their vision of the solution, regardless of its level of detail.

    During the meeting

    2. Hold the discussion

    • Facilitate the conversation according to what is needed (e.g. skip scope clarification if already well defined).
    • Have both parties explain their visions for the solution.
    • Talk about initial prototype and current iteration.

    After the meeting

    3. Wrap-up

    • Provide a key findings summary and agreements.
    • Outline next steps for all parties.

    4. Follow-up

    • Send the mock-up of any agreed upon prototype(s).
    • Schedule future meeting to continue prototyping.

    RDS is best done in quick succession. Keep in constant contact with both employees and developers to maintain positive momentum from a successful iteration improvement.

    Develop a tailored facilitation guide for JAD and RDS

    JAD/RDS are both collaborative activities, and as with all group activities, issues are bound to arise. Be proactive and resolve issues using the following guidelines.

    Scenario Technique
    Employee and developer visions for the solution don’t match up Focus on what both solutions have in common first to dissolve any tension. Next, understand the reason why both parties have differences. Was it a difference in assumptions? Difference in what is a requirement? Once the answer has been determined, work on bridging the gaps. If there is no resolution, appoint a credible authority (or yourself) to become the final decision maker.
    Employee has difficulty understanding the technical aspect of the developer’s solution Translate the developer’s technical terms into a language that the employee understands. Encourage the employee to ask questions to further their understanding.
    Employee was told that their requirement or proposed solution is not feasible Have a high-level member of the development team explain how the requirement/solution is not feasible. If it’s possible, tell the employee that the requirement can be done in a future release and keep them updated.

    Harvest documentation from past projects to uncover reusable requirements

    Technique Description Assessment and Best Practices Stakeholder Effort BA Effort
    Legacy System Manuals The process of reviewing documentation and manuals associated with legacy systems to identify constraints and exact requirements for reuse. Reviewing legacy systems and accompanying documentation is an excellent way to gain a preliminary understanding of the requirements for the upcoming application. Be careful not to overly rely on requirements from legacy systems; if legacy systems have a feature set up one way, this does not mean it should be set up the same way on the upcoming application. If an upcoming application must interact with other systems, it is ideal to understand the integration points early. None High
    Historical Projects The process of reviewing documentation from historical projects to extract reusable requirements. Previous project documentation can be a great source of information and historical lessons learned. Unfortunately, historical projects may not be well documented. Historical mining can save a great deal of time; however, the fact that it was done historically does not mean that it was done properly. None High

    Info-Tech Insight

    Document mining is a laborious process, and as the term “mining” suggests the yield will vary. Regardless of the outcome, document mining must be performed and should be viewed as an investment in the requirements gathering process.

    Extract internal and external constraints from business rules, policies, and glossaries

    Technique Description Assessment and Best Practices Stakeholder Effort BA Effort
    Rules The process of extracting business logic from pre-existing business rules (e.g. explicit or implied workflows). Stakeholders may not be fully aware of all of the business rules or the underlying rationale for the rules. Unfortunately, business rule documents can be lengthy and the number of rules relevant to the project will vary. None High
    Glossary The process of extracting terminology and definitions from glossaries. Terminology and definitions do not directly lead to the generation of requirements. However, reviewing glossaries will allow BAs to better understand domain SMEs and interpret their requirements. None High
    Policy The process of extracting business logic from business policy documents (e.g. security policy and acceptable use). Stakeholders may not be fully aware of the different policies or the underlying rationale for why they were created. Going directly to the source is an excellent way to identify constraints and requirements. Unfortunately, policies can be lengthy and the number of items relevant to the project will vary. None High

    Info-Tech Insight

    Document mining should be the first type of elicitation activity that is conducted because it allows the BA to become familiar with organizational terminology and processes. As a result, the stakeholder facing elicitation sessions will be more productive.

    Review the different types of formal documentation (Part 1)

    1. Glossary

    Extract terminology and definitions from glossaries. A glossary is an excellent source to understand the terminology that SMEs will use.

    2. Policy

    Pull business logic from policy documents (e.g. security policy and acceptable use). Policies generally have mandatory requirements for projects, such as standard compliance requirements.

    3. Rules

    Review and reuse business logic that comes from pre-existing rules (e.g. explicit or implied workflows). Like policies, rules often have mandatory requirements or at least will require significant change for something to no longer be a requirement.

    Review the different types of formal documentation (Part 2)

    4. Legacy System

    Review documents and manuals of legacy systems, and identify reusable constraints and requirements. Benefits include:

    • Gain a preliminary understanding of general organizational requirements.
    • Ease of solution integration with the legacy system if needed.

    Remember to not use all of the basic requirements of a legacy system. Always strive to find a better, more productive solution.

    5. Historical Projects

    Review documents from historical projects to extract reusable requirements. Lessons learned from the company’s previous projects are more applicable than case studies. While historical projects can be of great use, consider that previous projects may not be well documented.

    Drive business alignment as an output from documentation review

    Project managers frequently state that aligning projects to the business goals is a key objective of effective project management; however, it is rarely carried out throughout the project itself. This gap is often due to a lack of understanding around how to create true alignment between individual projects and the business needs.

    Use company-released statements and reports

    Extract business wants and needs from official statements and reports (e.g. press releases, yearly reports). Statements and reports outline where the organization wants to go which helps to unearth relevant project requirements.

    Ask yourself, does the project align to the business?

    Documented requirements should always align with the scope of the project and the business objectives. Refer back frequently to your set of gathered requirements to check if they are properly aligned and ensure the project is not veering away from the original scope and business objectives.

    Don’t just read for the sake of reading

    The largest problem with documentation review is that requirements gathering professionals do it for the sake of saying they did it. As a result, projects often go off course due to not aligning to business objectives following the review sessions.

    • When reading a document, take notes to avoid projects going over time and budget and business dissatisfaction. Document your notes and schedule time to review the set of complete notes with your team following the individual documentation review.

    Select elicitation techniques that match the elicitation scenario

    There is a time and place for each technique. Don’t become too reliant on the same ones. Diversify your approach based on the elicitation goal.

    A chart showing Elicitation Scenarios and Techniques, with each marked for their efficacy.

    This table shows the relative strengths and weaknesses of each elicitation technique compared against the five basic elicitation scenarios.

    A typical project will encounter most of the elicitation scenarios. Therefore, it is important to utilize a healthy mix of techniques to optimize effectiveness.

    Very Strong = Very Effective

    Strong = Effective

    Medium = Somewhat Effective

    Weak = Minimally Effective

    Very Weak = Not Effective

    Record the approved elicitation techniques that your BAs should use

    2.1.2 – 30 minutes

    Input
    • Approved elicitation techniques
    Output
    • Execution procedure
    Materials
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    Participants
    • Business stakeholders
    • BAs

    Record the approved elicitation methods and best practices for each technique in the SOP.

    Identify which techniques should be utilized with the different stakeholder classes.

    Segment the different techniques based by project complexity level.

    Use the following chart to record the approved techniques.

    Stakeholder L1 Projects L2 Projects L3 Projects L4 Projects
    Senior Management Structured Interviews
    Project Sponsor Unstructured Interviews
    SME (Business) Focus Groups Unstructured Interviews
    Functional Manager Focus Groups Structured Interviews
    End Users Surveys; Focus Groups; Follow-Up Interviews; Observational Techniques

    Document the output from this exercise in section 4.0 of the Requirements Gathering SOP and BA Playbook.

    Confirm initial elicitation notes with stakeholders

    Open lines of communication with stakeholders and keep them involved in the requirements gathering process; confirm the initial elicitation before proceeding.

    Confirming the notes from the elicitation session with stakeholders will result in three benefits:

    1. Simple miscommunications can compound and result in costly rework if they aren’t caught early. Providing stakeholders with a copy of notes from the elicitation session will eliminate issues before they manifest themselves in the project.
    2. Stakeholders often require an absorption period after elicitation sessions to reflect on the meeting. Following up with stakeholders gives them an opportunity to clarify, enhance, or change their responses.
    3. Stakeholders will become disinterested in the project (and potentially the finished application) if their involvement in the project ends after elicitation. Confirming the notes from elicitation keeps them involved in the process and transitions stakeholders into the analysis phase.

    This is the Confirm stage of the Confirm, Verify, Approve process.

    “Are these notes accurate and complete?”

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    2.1.1 Understand the different elicitation techniques

    An analyst will walk you through the different elicitation techniques including observations, document reviews, surveys, focus groups, and interviews, and highlight the level of effort required for each.

    2.1.2 Select and record the approved elicitation techniques

    An analyst will facilitate the discussion to determine which techniques should be utilized with the different stakeholder classes.

    Step 2.2: Structure Elicitation Output

    Phase 1

    1.1 Understand the Benefits of Requirements Optimization

    1.2 Determine Your Target State for Requirements Gathering

    Phase 2

    2.1 Determine Elicitation Techniques

    2.2 Structure Elicitation Output

    Phase 3

    3.1 Create Analysis Framework

    3.2 Validate Business Requirements

    Phase 4

    4.1 Create Control Processes for Requirements Changes

    4.2 Build Requirements Governance and Communication Plan

    This step will walk you through the following activities:
    • Build use-case models.
    • Practice using elicitation techniques with business stakeholders to build use-case models.
    • Practice leveraging user stories to convey requirements.
    This step involves the following participants:
    • BAs
    • Business stakeholders
    Outcomes of this step
    • Understand the value of use-case models for requirements gathering.
    • Practice different techniques for building use-case models with stakeholders.

    Record and capture requirements in solution-oriented formats

    Unstructured notes for each requirement are difficult to manage and create ambiguity. Using solution-oriented formats during elicitation sessions ensures that the content can be digested by IT and business users.

    This table shows common solution-oriented formats for recording requirements. Determine which formats the development team and BAs are comfortable using and create a list of acceptable formats to use in projects.

    Format Description Examples
    Behavior Diagrams These diagrams describe what must happen in the system. Business Process Models, Swim Lane Diagram, Use Case Diagram
    Interaction Diagrams These diagrams describe the flow and control of data within a system. Sequence Diagrams, Entity Diagrams
    Stories These text-based representations take the perspective of a user and describe the activities and benefits of a process. Scenarios, User Stories

    Info-Tech Insight

    Business process modeling is an excellent way to visually represent intricate processes for both IT and business users. For complex projects with high business significance, business process modeling is the best way to capture requirements and create transformational gains.

    Use cases give projects direction and guidance from the business perspective

    Use Case Creation Process

    Define Use Cases for Each Stakeholder

    • Each stakeholder may have different uses for the same solution. Identify all possible use cases attributed to the stakeholders.
    • All use cases are possible test case scenarios.

    Define Applications for Each Use Case

    • Applications are the engines behind the use cases. Defining the applications to satisfy use cases will pinpoint the areas where development or procurement is necessary.

    Consider the following guidelines:

    1. Don’t involve systems in the use cases. Use cases just identify the key end-user interaction points that the proposed solution is supposed to cover.
    2. Some use cases are dependent on other use cases or multiple stakeholders may be involved in a single use case. Depending on the availability of these use cases, they can either be all identified up front (Waterfall) or created at various iterations (Agile).
    3. Consider the enterprise architecture perspective. Existing enterprise architecture designs can provide a foundation of current requirement mappings and system structure. Reuse these resources to reduce efforts.
    4. Avoid developing use cases in isolation. Reusability is key in reducing designing efforts. By involving multiple departments, requirement clashes can be avoided and the likelihood of reusability increases.

    Develop practical use cases to help drive the development effort in the right direction

    Evaluating the practicality and likelihood of use cases is just as important as developing them.

    Use cases can conflict with each other. In certain situations, specific requirements of these use cases may clash with one another even though they are functionally sound. Evaluate use-case requirements and determine how they satisfy the overall business need.

    Use cases are not necessarily isolated; they can be nested. Certain functionalities are dependent on the results of another action, often in a hierarchical fashion. By mapping out the expected workflows, BAs can determine the most appropriate way to implement.

    Use cases can be functionally implemented in many ways. There could be multiple ways to accomplish the same use case. Each of these needs to be documented so that functional testing and user documentation can be based on them.

    Nested Use Case Examples:

    Log Into Account ← Depends on (Nested) Ordering Products Online
    Enter username and password Complete order form
    Verify user is a real person Process order
    Send user forgotten password message Check user’s account
    Send order confirmation to user

    Build a use-case model

    2.2.1 – 45 minutes

    Input
    • Sub processes
    Output
    • Use case model
    Materials
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    Participants
    • Business stakeholders
    • BAs
    Demonstrate how to use elicitation techniques to build use cases for the project.
    1. Identify a sub-process to build the use-case model. Begin the exercise by giving a brief description of the purpose of the meeting.
    2. For each stakeholder, draw a stick figure on the board. Pose the question “If you need to do X, what is your first step?” Go through the process until the end goal and draw each step. Ensure that you capture triggers, causes, decision points, outcomes, tools, and interactions.
    3. Starting at the beginning of the diagram, go through each step again and check with stakeholders if the step can be broken down into more granular steps.
    4. Ask the stakeholder if there are any alternative flows that people use, or any exceptions to process steps. If there are, map these out on the board.
    5. Go back through each step and ask the stakeholder where the current process is causing them grief, and where modification should be made.
    6. Record this information in the Business Requirements Document Template.

    Build a use-case model

    2.2.1

    Example: Generate Letters

    Inspector: Log into system → Search for case → Identify recipient → Determine letter type → Print letter

    Admin: Receive letter from inspector → Package and mail letter

    Citizen: Receive letter from inspector

    Understand user stories and profiles

    What are they?

    User stories describe what requirement a user wants in the solution and why they want it. The end goal of a user story is to create a simple description of a requirement for developers.

    When to use them

    User stories should always be used in requirements gathering. User stories should be collected throughout the elicitation process. Try to recapture user stories as new project information is released to capture any changes in end-customer needs.

    What’s the benefit?

    User stories help capture target users, customers, and stakeholders. They also create a “face” for individual user requirements by providing user context. This detail enables IT leaders to associate goals and end objectives with each persona.

    Takeaway

    To better understand the characteristics driving user requirements, begin to map objectives to separate user personas that represent each of the project stakeholders.

    Are user stories worth the time and effort?

    Absolutely.

    A user’s wants and needs serve as a constant reminder to developers. Developers can use this information to focus on how a solution needs to accomplish a goal instead of only focusing on what goals need to be completed.

    Create customized user stories to guide or structure your elicitation output

    Instructions

    1. During surveys, interviews, and development sessions, ask participants the following questions:
      • What do you want from the solution?
      • Why do you want that?
    2. Separate the answer into an “I want to” and “So that” format.
      • For users who give multiple “I want to” and “So that” statements, separate them into their respective pairs.
    3. Place each story on a small card that can easily be given to developers.
    As a I want to So that Size Priority
    Developer Learn network and system constraints The churn between Operations and I will be reduced. 1 point Low

    Team member

    Increase the number of demonstrations I can achieve greater alignment with business stakeholders. 3 points High
    Product owner Implement a user story prioritization technique I can delegate stories in my product backlog to multiple Agile teams. 3 points Medium

    How to make an effective and compelling user story

    Keep your user stories short and impactful to ensure that they retain their impact.

    Follow a simple formula:

    As a [stakeholder title], I want to [one requirement] so that [reason for wanting that requirement].

    Use this template for all user stories. Other formats will undermine the point of a user story. Multiple requirements from a single user must be made into multiple stories and given to the appropriate developer. User stories should fit onto a sticky note or small card.

    Example

    As an: I want to: So that:
    Administrator Integrate with Excel File transfer won’t possibly lose information
    X Administrator Integrate with Excel and Word File transfer won’t possibly lose information

    While the difference between the two may be small, it would still undermine the effectiveness of a user story. Different developers may work on the integration of Excel or Word and may not receive this user story.

    Assign user stories a size and priority level

    Designate a size to user stories

    Size is an estimate of how many resources must be dedicated to accomplish the want. Assign a size to each user story to help determine resource allocation.

    Assign business priority to user stories

    Based on how important the requirement is to project success, assign each user story a rating of high, medium, or low. The priority given will dictate which requirements are completed first.

    Example:

    Scope: Design software to simplify financial reporting

    User Story Estimated Size Priority
    As an administrator, I want to integrate with Excel so that file transfer won’t possibly lose information. Low High
    As an administrator, I want to simplify graph construction so that I can more easily display information for stakeholders. High Medium

    Combine both size and priority to decide resource allocation. Low-size, high-priority tasks should always be done first.

    Group similar user stories together to create greater impact

    Group user stories that have the same requirement

    When collecting user stories, many will be centered around the same requirement. Group similar user stories together to show the need for that requirement’s inclusion in the solution.

    Even if it isn’t a must-have requirement, if the number of similar user stories is high enough, it would become the most important should-have requirement.

    Group together user stories such as these:
    As an I want So that
    Administrator To be able to create bar graphs Information can be more easily illustrated
    Accountant To be able to make pie charts Budget information can be visually represented

    Both user stories are about creating charts and would be developed similarly.

    Leave these user stories separate
    As an I want So that
    Administrator The program to auto-save Information won’t be lost during power outages
    Accountant To be able to save to SharePoint My colleagues can easily view and edit my work

    While both stories are about saving documents, the development of each feature is vastly different.

    Create customized user profiles

    User profiles are a way of grouping users based on a significant shared details (e.g. in the finance department, website user).

    Go beyond the user profile

    When creating the profile, consider more than the group’s name. Ask yourself the following questions:

    • What level of knowledge and expertise does this user profile have with this type of software?
    • How much will this user profile interact with the solution?
    • What degree of dependency will this user profile have on the solution?

    For example, if a user profile has low expertise but interacts and depends heavily on the program, a more thorough tutorial of the FAQ section is needed.

    Profiles put developers in user’s shoes

    Grouping users together helps developers put a face to the name. Developers can then more easily empathize with users and develop an end solution that is directly catered to their needs.

    Leverage group activities to break down user-story sizing techniques

    Work in groups to run through the following story-sizing activities.

    Planning Poker: This approach uses the Delphi method where members estimate the size of each user story by revealing numbered cards. These estimates are then discussed and agreed upon as a group.

    • Planning poker generates discussion about variances in estimates but dominant personalities may lead to biased results or groupthink.

    Team Sort: This approach can assist in expediting estimation when you are handling numerous user stories.

    • Bucket your user stories into sizes (e.g. extra-small, small, medium, large, and extra-large) based on an acceptable benchmark that may change from project to project.
    • Collaborate as a team to conclude the final size.
    • Next, translate these sizes into points.

    The graphic shows the two activities described, Planning Poker and Team Sort. In the Planning Poker image, 3 sets of cards are shown, with the numbers 13, 5, and 1 on the top of each set. At the bottom of the image are 7 cards, labelled with: 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21. In the Team Sort section, there is an arrow pointing in both directions, representing a spectrum from XS to XL. Each size is assigned a point value: XS is 1; S is 3; M is 5; L is 10; and XL is 20. Cards with User Story # written on them are arranged along the spectrum.

    Create a product backlog to communicate business needs to development teams

    Use the product backlog to capture expected work and create a roadmap for the project by showing what requirements need to be delivered.

    How is the product owner involved?

    • The product owner is responsible for keeping in close contact with the end customer and making the appropriate changes to the product backlog as new ideas, insights, and impediments arise.
    • The product owner should have good communication with the team to make accurate changes to the product backlog depending on technical difficulties and needs for clarification.

    How do I create a product backlog?

    • Write requirements in user stories. Use the format: “As a (user role), I want (function) so that (benefit).” Identify end users and understand their needs.
    • Assign each requirement a priority. Decide which requirements are the most important to deliver. Ask yourself, “Which user story will create the most value?”

    What are the approaches to generate my backlog?

    • Team Brainstorming – The product owner, team, and scrum master work together to write and prioritize user stories in a single or a series of meetings.
    • Business Case – The product owner translates business cases into user stories as per the definition of “development ready.”

    Epics and Themes

    As you begin to take on larger projects, it may be advantageous to organize and group your user stories to simplify your release plan:

    • Epics are collections of similar user stories and are used to describe significant and large development initiatives.
    • Themes are collections of similar epics and are normally used to define high-level business objectives.

    To avoid confusion, the pilot product backlog will be solely composed of user stories.

    Example:

    Theme: Increase user exposure to corporate services through mobile devices
    Epic: Access corporate services through a mobile application Epic: Access corporate services through mobile website
    User Story: As a user, I want to find the closest office so that I can minimize travel time As a user, I want to find the closest office so that I can minimize travel time User Story: As a user, I want to submit a complaint so that I can improve company processes

    Simulate product backlog creation

    Overview

    Leverage Info-Tech’s Scrum Documentation Template, using the Backlog and Planning tab, to help walk you through this activity.

    Instructions

    1. Have your product owner describe the business objectives of the pilot project.
    2. Write the key business requirements as user stories.
    3. Based on your business value drivers, identify the business value of your user stories (high, medium, low).
    4. Have your team review the user stories and question the story’s value, priority, goal, and meaning.
    5. Break down the user stories if the feature or business goal is unclear or too large.
    6. Document the perceived business value of each user story, as well as the priority, goal, and meaning.

    Examples:

    As a citizen, I want to know about road construction so that I can save time when driving. Business Value: High

    As a customer, I want to find the nearest government office so that I can register for benefits. Business Value: Medium

    As a voter, I want to know what each candidate believes in so that I can make an informed decision. Business Value: High

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    2.2.1 Build use-case models

    An analyst will assist in demonstrating how to use elicitation techniques to build use-case models. The analyst will walk you through the table testing to visually map out and design process flows for each use case.

    Phase 3: Analyze and Validate Requirements

    Phase 3 outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 3: Analyze and Validate Requirements

    Proposed Time to Completion: 1 week
    Step 3.1: Create Analysis Framework

    Start with an analyst kick off call:

    • Create policies for requirements categorization and prioritization.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Create functional requirements categories.
    • Consolidate similar requirements and eliminate redundancies.
    • Prioritize requirements.

    With these tools & templates:

    • Requirements Gathering Documentation Tool
    Step 3.2: Validate Business Requirements

    Review findings with analyst:

    • Establish best practices for validating the BRD with project stakeholders.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Right-size the BRD.
    • Present the BRD to business stakeholders.
    • Translate business requirements into technical requirements.
    • Identify testing opportunities.

    With these tools & templates:

    • Business Requirements Document Template
    • Requirements Gathering Testing Checklist

    Phase 3 Results & Insights:

    • Standardized frameworks for analysis and validation of business requirements

    Step 3.1: Create Analysis Framework

    Phase 1

    1.1 Understand the Benefits of Requirements Optimization

    1.2 Determine Your Target State for Requirements Gathering

    Phase 2

    2.1 Determine Elicitation Techniques

    2.2 Structure Elicitation Output

    Phase 3

    3.1 Create Analysis Framework

    3.2 Validate Business Requirements

    Phase 4

    4.1 Create Control Processes for Requirements Changes

    4.2 Build Requirements Governance and Communication Plan

    This step will walk you through the following activities:
    • Categorize requirements.
    • Eliminate redundant requirements.
    This step involves the following participants:
    • BAs
    Outcomes of this step
    • Prioritized requirements list.

    Analyze requirements to de-duplicate them, consolidate them – and most importantly – prioritize them!

    he image is the Requirements Gathering Framework, shown earlier. All parts of the framework are greyed-out, except for the arrow containing the word Analyze in the center of the image, with three bullet points beneath it that read: Organize; Prioritize; Verify

    The analysis phase is where requirements are compiled, categorized, and prioritized to make managing large volumes easier. Many organizations prematurely celebrate being finished the elicitation phase and do not perform adequate diligence in this phase; however, the analysis phase is crucial for a smooth transition into validation and application development or procurement.

    Categorize requirements to identify and highlight requirement relationships and dependencies

    Eliciting requirements is an important step in the process, but turning endless pages of notes into something meaningful to all stakeholders is the major challenge.

    Begin the analysis phase by categorizing requirements to make locating, reconciling, and managing them much easier. There are often complex relationships and dependencies among requirements that do not get noted or emphasized to the development team and as a result get overlooked.

    Typically, requirements are classified as functional and non-functional at the high level. Functional requirements specify WHAT the system or component needs to do and non-functional requirements explain HOW the system must behave.

    Examples

    Functional Requirement: The application must produce a sales report at the end of the month.

    Non-Functional Requirement: The report must be available within one minute after midnight (EST) of the last day of the month. The report will be available for five years after the report is produced. All numbers in the report will be displayed to two decimal places.

    Categorize requirements to identify and highlight requirement relationships and dependencies

    Further sub-categorization of requirements is necessary to realize the full benefit of categorization. Proficient BAs will even work backwards from the categories to drive the elicitation sessions. The categories used will depend on the type of project, but for categorizing non-functional requirements, the Volere Requirements Resources has created an exhaustive list of sub-categories.

    Requirements Category Elements

    Example

    Look & Feel Appearance, Style

    User Experience

    Usability & Humanity Ease of Use, Personalization, Internationalization, Learning, Understandability, Accessibility Language Support
    Performance Speed, Latency, Safety, Precision, Reliability, Availability, Robustness, Capacity, Scalability, Longevity Bandwidth
    Operational & Environmental Expected Physical Environment, Interfacing With Adjacent Systems, Productization, Release Heating and Cooling
    Maintainability & Support Maintenance, Supportability, Adaptability Warranty SLAs

    Security

    Access, Integrity, Privacy, Audit, Immunity Intrusion Prevention
    Cultural & Political Global Differentiation Different Statutory Holidays
    Legal Compliance, Standards Hosting Regulations

    What constitutes good requirements

    Complete – Expressed a whole idea or statement.

    Correct – Technically and legally possible.

    Clear – Unambiguous and not confusing.

    Verifiable – It can be determined that the system meets the requirement.

    Necessary – Should support one of the project goals.

    Feasible – Can be accomplished within cost and schedule.

    Prioritized – Tracked according to business need levels.

    Consistent – Not in conflict with other requirements.

    Traceable – Uniquely identified and tracked.

    Modular – Can be changed without excessive impact.

    Design-independent – Does not pose specific solutions on design.

    Create functional requirement categories

    3.1.1 – 1 hour

    Input
    • Activity 2.2.1
    Output
    • Requirements categories
    Materials
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes
    Participants
    • BAs
    Practice the techniques for categorizing requirements.
    1. Divide the list of requirements that were elicited for the identified sub-process in exercise 2.2.1 among smaller groups.
    2. Have groups write the requirements on red, yellow, or green sticky notes, depending on the stakeholder’s level of influence.
    3. Along the top of the whiteboard, write the eight requirements categories, and have each group place the sticky notes under the category where they believe they should fit.
    4. Once each group has posted the requirements, review the board and discuss any requirements that should be placed in another category.

    Document any changes to the requirements categories in section 5.1 of the Requirements Gathering SOP and BA Playbook.

    Create functional requirement categories

    The image depicts a whiteboard with different colored post-it notes grouped into the following categories: Look & Feel; Usability & Humanity; Legal; Maintainability & Support; Operational & Environmental; Security; Cultural & Political; and Performance.

    Consolidate similar requirements and eliminate redundancies

    Clean up requirements and make everyone’s life simpler!

    After elicitation, it is very common for an organization to end up with redundant, complementary, and conflicting requirements. Consolidation will make managing a large volume of requirements much easier.

    Redundant Requirements Owner Priority
    1. The application shall feed employee information into the payroll system. Payroll High
    2. The application shall feed employee information into the payroll system. HR Low
    Result The application shall feed employee information into the payroll system. Payroll & HR High
    Complementary Requirements Owner Priority
    1. The application shall export reports in XLS and PDF format. Marketing High
    2. The application shall export reports in CSV and PDF format. Finance High
    Result The application shall export reports in XLS, CSV, and PDF format. Marketing & Finance High

    Info-Tech Insight

    When collapsing redundant or complementary requirements, it is imperative that the ownership and priority metadata be preserved for future reference. Avoid consolidating complementary requirements with drastically different priority levels.

    Identify and eliminate conflict between requirements

    Conflicting requirements are unavoidable; identify and resolve them as early as possible to minimize rework and grief.

    Conflicting requirements occur when stakeholders have requirements that either partially or fully contradict one another, and as a result, it is not possible or practical to implement all of the requirements.

    Steps to Resolving Conflict:

    1. Notify the relevant stakeholders of the conflict and search for a basic solution or compromise.
    2. If the stakeholders remain in a deadlock, appoint a final decision maker.
    3. Schedule a meeting to resolve the conflict with the relevant stakeholders and the decision maker. If multiple conflicts exist between the same stakeholder groups, try to resolve as many as possible at once to save time and encourage reciprocation.
    4. Give all parties the opportunity to voice their rationale and objectively rate the priority of the requirement. Attempt to reach an agreement, consensus, or compromise.
    5. If the parties remain in a deadlock, encourage the final decision maker to weigh in. Their decision should be based on which party has the greater need for the requirement, the difficulty to implement the requirement, and which requirement better aligns with the project goals.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Resolve conflicts whenever possible during the elicitation phase by using cross-functional workshops to facilitate discussions that address and settle conflicts in the room.

    Consolidate similar requirements and eliminate redundancies

    3.1.2 – 30 minutes

    Input
    • Activity 3.1.1
    Output
    • Requirements categories
    Materials
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes
    Participants
    • BAs

    Review the outputs from the last exercise and ensure that the list is mutually exclusive by consolidating similar requirements and eliminating redundancies.

    1. Looking at each category in turn, review the sticky notes and group similar, complementary, and conflicting notes together. Put a red dot on any conflicting requirements to be used in a later exercise.
    2. Have the group start by eliminating the redundant requirements.
    3. Have the group look at the complementary requirements, and consolidate each into a single requirement. Discard originals.
    4. Record this information in the Requirements Gathering Documentation Tool.

    Prioritize requirements to assist with solution modeling

    Prioritization is the process of ranking each requirement based on its importance to project success. Hold a separate meeting for the domain SMEs, implementation SMEs, project managers, and project sponsors to prioritize the requirements list. At the conclusion of the meeting, each requirement should be assigned a priority level. The implementation SMEs will use these priority levels to ensure efforts are targeted towards the proper requirements as well as to plan features available on each release. Use the MoSCoW Model of Prioritization to effectively order requirements.

    The MoSCoW Model of Prioritization

    The image shows the MoSCoW Model of Prioritization, which is shaped like a pyramid. The sections, from top to bottom (becoming incrementally larger) are: Must Have; Should Have; Could Have; and Won't Have. There is additional text next to each category, as follows: Must have - Requirements must be implemented for the solution to be considered successful.; Should have: Requirements are high priority that should be included in the solution if possible.; Could Have: Requirements are desirable but not necessary and could be included if resources are available.; Won't Have: Requirements won’t be in the next release, but will be considered for the future releases.

    The MoSCoW model was introduced by Dai Clegg of Oracle UK in 1994 (Source: ProductPlan).

    Base your prioritization on the right set of criteria

    Effective Prioritization Criteria

    Criteria

    Description

    Regulatory & Legal Compliance These requirements will be considered mandatory.
    Policy Compliance Unless an internal policy can be altered or an exception can be made, these requirements will be considered mandatory.
    Business Value Significance Give a higher priority to high-value requirements.
    Business Risk Any requirement with the potential to jeopardize the entire project should be given a high priority and implemented early.
    Likelihood of Success Especially in proof-of-concept projects, it is recommended that requirements have good odds.
    Implementation Complexity Give a higher priority to low implementation difficulty requirements.
    Alignment With Strategy Give a higher priority to requirements that enable the corporate strategy.
    Urgency Prioritize requirements based on time sensitivity.
    Dependencies A requirement on its own may be low priority, but if it supports a high-priority requirement, then its priority must match it.

    Info-Tech Insight

    It is easier to prioritize requirements if they have already been collapsed, resolved, and rewritten. There is no point in prioritizing every requirement that is elicited up front when some of them will eventually be eliminated.

    Use the Requirements Gathering Documentation Tool to steer your requirements gathering approach during a project

    3.1 Requirements Gathering Documentation Tool

    Use the Requirements Gathering Documentation Tool to identify and track stakeholder involvement, elicitation techniques, and scheduling, as well as to track categorization and prioritization of requirements.

    • Use the Identify Stakeholders tab to:
      • Identify the stakeholder's name and role.
      • Identify their influence and involvement.
      • Identify the elicitation techniques that you will be using.
      • Identify who will be conducting the elicitation sessions.
      • Identify if requirements were validated post elicitation session.
      • Identify when the elicitation will take place.
    • Use the Categorize & Prioritize tab to:
      • Identify the stakeholder.
      • Identify the core function.
      • Identify the business requirement.
      • Describe the requirement.
      • Identify the categorization of the requirement.
      • Identify the level of priority of the requirement.

    Prioritize requirements

    3.1.3 – 30 minutes

    Input
    • Requirements list
    • Prioritization criteria
    Output
    • Prioritized requirements
    Materials
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes
    Participants
    • BAs
    • Business stakeholders

    Using the output from the MoSCoW model, prioritize the requirements according to those you must have, should have, could have, and won’t have.

    1. As a group, review each requirement and decide if the requirement is:
      1. Must have
      2. Should have
      3. Could have
      4. Won’t have
    2. Beginning with the must-have requirements, determine if each has any dependencies. Ensure that each of the dependencies are moved to the must-have category. Group and circle the dependent requirements.
    3. Continue the same exercise with the should-have and could-have options.
    4. Record the results in the Requirements Gathering Documentation Tool.

    Step 1 – Prioritize requirements

    3.1.3

    The image shows a whiteboard, with four categories listed at the top: Must Have; Should Have; Could Have; Won't Have. There are yellow post-it notes under each category.

    Step 2-3 – Prioritize requirements

    This image is the same as the previous image, but with the additions of two dotted line squares under the Must Have category, with arrows pointing to them from post-its in the Should have category.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    3.1.1 Create functional requirements categories

    An analyst will facilitate the discussion to brainstorm and determine criteria for requirements categories.

    3.1.2 Consolidate similar requirements and eliminate redundancies

    An analyst will facilitate a session to review the requirements categories to ensure the list is mutually exclusive by consolidating similar requirements and eliminating redundancies.

    3.1.3 Prioritize requirements

    An analyst will facilitate the discussion on how to prioritize requirements according to the MoSCoW prioritization framework. The analyst will also walk you through the exercise of determining dependencies for each requirement.

    Step 3.2: Validate Business Requirements

    Phase 1

    1.1 Understand the Benefits of Requirements Optimization

    1.2 Determine Your Target State for Requirements Gathering

    Phase 2

    2.1 Determine Elicitation Techniques

    2.2 Structure Elicitation Output

    Phase 3

    3.1 Create Analysis Framework

    3.2 Validate Business Requirements

    Phase 4

    4.1 Create Control Processes for Requirements Changes

    4.2 Build Requirements Governance and Communication Plan

    This step will walk you through the following activities:
    • Build the BRD.
    • Translate functional requirements to technical requirements.
    • Identify testing opportunities.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • BAs

    Outcomes of this step

    • Finalized BRD.

    Validate requirements to ensure that they meet stakeholder needs – getting sign-off is essential

    The image is the Requirements Gathering Framework shown previously. In this instance, all aspects of the graphic are greyed out with the exception of the Validate arrow, right of center. Below the arrow are three bullet points: Translate; Allocate; Approve.

    The validation phase involves translating the requirements, modeling the solutions, allocating features across the phased deployment plan, preparing the requirements package, and getting requirement sign-off. This is the last step in the Info-Tech Requirements Gathering Framework.

    Prepare a user-friendly requirements package

    Before going for final sign-off, ensure that you have pulled together all of the relevant documentation.

    The requirements package is a compilation of all of the business analysis and requirements gathering that occurred. The document will be distributed among major stakeholders for review and sign-off.

    Some may argue that the biggest challenge in the validation phase is getting the stakeholders to sign off on the requirements package; however, the real challenge is getting them to actually read it. Often, stakeholders sign the requirements document without fully understanding the scope of the application, details of deployment, and how it affects them.

    Remember, this document is not for the BAs; it’s for the stakeholders. Make the package with the stakeholders in mind. Create multiple versions of the requirements package where the length and level of technical details is tailored to the audience. Consider creating a supplementary PowerPoint version of the requirements package to present to senior management.

    Contents of Requirements Package:

    • Project Charter (if available)
    • Overarching Project Goals
    • Categorized Business Requirements
    • Selected Solution Proposal
    • Rationale for Solution Selection
    • Phased Roll-Out Plan
    • Proposed Schedule/Timeline
    • Signatures Page

    "Sit down with your stakeholders, read them the document line by line, and have them paraphrase it back to you so you’re on the same page." – Anonymous City Manager of IT Project Planning Info-Tech Interview

    Capture requirements in a dedicated BRD

    The BRD captures the original business objectives and high-level business requirements for the system/process. The system requirements document (SRD) captures the more detailed functional and technical requirements.

    The graphic is grouped into two sections, indicated by brackets on the right side, the top section labelled BRD and the lower section labelled as SRD. In the BRD section, a box reads Needs Identified in the Business Case. An arrow points from the bottom of the box down to another box labelled Use Cases. In the SRD section, there are three arrows pointing from the Use Cases box to three boxes in a row. They are labelled Functionality; Usability; and Constraints. Each of these boxes has a plus sign between it and the next in the line. At the bottom of the SRD section is a box with text that reads: Quality of Service Reliability, Supportability, and Performance

    Use Info-Tech’s Business Requirements Document Template to specify the business needs and expectations

    3.2 Business Requirements Document Template

    The Business Requirements Document Template can be used to record the functional, quality, and usability requirements into formats that are easily consumable for future analysis, architectural and design activities, and most importantly in a format that is understandable by all business partners.

    The BRD is designed to take the reader from a high-level understanding of the business processes down to the detailed automation requirements. It should capture the following:

    • Project summary and background
    • Operating model
    • Business process model
    • Use cases
    • Requirements elicitation techniques
    • Prioritized requirements
    • Assumptions and constraints

    Rightsize the BRD

    3.2.1 – 30 minutes

    Input
    • Project levels
    • BRD categories
    Output
    • BRD
    Materials
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    Participants
    • BAs
    • Business stakeholders

    Build the required documentation for requirements gathering.

    1. On the board, write out the components of the BRD. As a group, review the headings and decide if all sections are needed for level 1 & 2 and level 3 & 4 projects. Your level 3-4 project business cases will have the most detailed business cases; consider your level 1-2 projects, and remove any categories you don’t believe are necessary for the project level.
    2. Now that you have a right-sized template, break the team into two groups and have each group complete one section of the template for your selected project.
      1. Project overview
      2. Implementation considerations
    3. Once complete, have each group present its section, and allow the group to make additions and modifications to each section.

    Document the output from this exercise in section 6 of the Requirements Gathering SOP and BA Playbook.

    Present the BRD to business stakeholders

    3.2.2 – 1 hour

    Input
    • Activity 3.2.1
    Output
    • BRD presentation
    Materials
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    Participants
    • Business stakeholders

    Practice presenting the requirements document to business stakeholders.

    1. Hold a meeting with a group of selected stakeholders, and have a representative present each section of the BRD for your project.
    2. Instruct participants that they should spend the majority of their time on the requirements section, in particular the operating model and the requirements prioritization.
    3. At the end of the meeting, have the business stakeholders validate the requirements, and approve moving forward with the project or indicate where further requirements gathering must take place.

    Example:

    Typical Requirements Gathering Validation Meeting Agenda
    Project overview 5 minutes
    Project operating model 10 minutes
    Prioritized requirements list 5 minutes
    Business process model 30 minutes
    Implementation considerations 5 minutes

    Translate business requirements into technical requirements

    3.2.3 – 30 minutes

    Input
    • Business requirements
    Output
    • BRD presentation
    Materials
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    Participants
    • Business stakeholders
    • BAs
    • Developers

    Practice translating business requirements into system requirements.

    1. Bring in representatives from the development team, and have a representative walk them through the business process model.
    2. Present a detailed account of each business requirement, and work with the IT team to build out the system requirements for each.
    3. Document the system requirements in the Requirements Gathering Documentation Tool.

    For requirements traceability, ensure you’re linking your requirements management back to your test strategy

    After a solution has been fully deployed, it’s critical to create a strong link between your software testing strategy and the requirements that were collected. User acceptance testing (UAT) is a good approach for requirement verification.

    • Many organizations fail to create an explicit connection between their requirements gathering and software testing strategies. Don’t follow their example!
    • When conducting UAT, structure exercises in the context of the requirements; run through the signed-off list and ask users whether or not the deployed functionality was in line with the expectations outlined in the finalized requirements documentation.
    • If not – determine whether it was a miscommunication on the requirements management side or a failure of the developers (or procurement team) to meet the agreed-upon requirements.

    Download the Requirements Gathering Testing Checklist template.

    Identify the testing opportunities

    3.2.4 – 30 minutes

    Input
    • List of requirements
    Output
    • Requirements testing process
    Materials
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    Participants
    • BAs
    • Developers

    Identify how to test the effectiveness of different requirements.

    1. Ask the group to review the list of requirements and identify:
      1. Which kinds of requirements enable constructive testing efforts?
      2. Which kinds of requirements enable destructive testing efforts?
      3. Which kinds of requirements support end-user acceptance testing?
      4. What do these validation-enabling objectives mean in terms of requirement specificity?
    2. For each, identify who will do the testing and at what stage.

    Verify that the requirements still meet the stakeholders’ needs

    Keep the stakeholders involved in the process in between elicitation and sign-off to ensure that nothing gets lost in transition.

    After an organization’s requirements have been aggregated, categorized, and consolidated, the business requirements package will begin to take shape. However, there is still a great deal of work to complete. Prior to proceeding with the process, requirements should be verified by domain SMEs to ensure that the analyzed requirements continue to meet their needs. This step is often overlooked because it is laborious and can create additional work; however, the workload associated with verification is much less than the eventual rework stemming from poor requirements.

    All errors in the requirements gathering process eventually surface; it is only a matter of time. Control when these errors appear and minimize costs by soliciting feedback from stakeholders early and often.

    This is the Verify stage of the Confirm, Verify, Approve process.

    “Do these requirements still meet your needs?”

    Put it all together: obtain final requirements sign-off

    Use the sign-off process as one last opportunity to manage expectations, obtain commitment from the stakeholders, and minimize change requests.

    Development or procurement of the application cannot begin until the requirements package has been approved by all of the key stakeholders. This will be the third time that the stakeholders are asked to review the requirements; however, this will be the first time that the stakeholders are asked to sign off on them.

    It is important that the stakeholders understand the significance of their signatures. This is their last opportunity to see exactly what the solution will look like and to make change requests. Ensure that the stakeholders also recognize which requirements were omitted from the solution that may affect them.

    The sign-off process needs to mean something to the stakeholders. Once a signature is given, that stakeholder must be accountable for it and should not be able to make change requests. Note that there are some requests from senior stakeholders that can’t be refused; use discretion when declining requests.

    This is the Approve stage of the Confirm, Verify, Approve process.

    "Once requirements are signed off, stay firm on them!" – Anonymous Hospital Business Systems Analyst Info-Tech Interview

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with out Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    3.2.1; 3.2.2 Rightsize the BRD and present it to business stakeholders

    An analyst will facilitate the discussion to gather the required documentation for building the BRD. The analyst will also assist with practicing the presenting of each section of the document to business stakeholders.

    3.2.3; 3.2.4 Translate business requirements into technical requirements and identify testing opportunities

    An analyst will facilitate the session to practice translating business requirements into testing requirements and assist in determining how to test the effectiveness of different requirements.

    Phase 4: Create a Requirements Governance Action Plan

    Phase 4 outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 4: Create a Requirements Governance Action Plan

    Proposed Time to Completion: 3 weeks

    Step 4.1: Create Control Processes for Requirements Changes

    Start with an analyst kick off call:

    • Discuss how to handle changes to requirements and establish a formal change control process.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Develop a change control process.
    • Build the guidelines for escalating changes.
    • Confirm your requirements gathering process.
    • Define RACI for the requirements gathering process.

    With these tools & templates:

    • Requirements Traceability Matrix
    Step 4.2: Build Requirements Governance and Communication Plan

    Review findings with analyst:

    • Review options for ongoing governance of the requirements gathering process.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Define the requirements gathering steering committee purpose.
    • Define the RACI for the RGSC.
    • Define procedures, cadence, and agenda for the RGSC.
    • Identify and analyze stakeholders.
    • Create a communications management plan.
    • Build the requirements gathering process implementation timeline.

    With these tools & templates:

    Requirements Gathering Communication Tracking Template

    Phase 4 Results & Insights:
    • Formalized change control and governance processes for requirements.

    Step 4.1: Create Control Processes for Requirements Changes

    Phase 1

    1.1 Understand the Benefits of Requirements Optimization

    1.2 Determine Your Target State for Requirements Gathering

    Phase 2

    2.1 Determine Elicitation Techniques

    2.2 Structure Elicitation Output

    Phase 3

    3.1 Create Analysis Framework

    3.2 Validate Business Requirements

    Phase 4

    4.1 Create Control Processes for Requirements Changes

    4.2 Build Requirements Governance and Communication Plan

    This step will walk you through the following activities:
    • Develop change control process.
    • Develop change escalation process.
    This step involves the following participants:
    • BAs
    • Business stakeholders
    Outcomes of this step
    • Requirements gathering process validation.
    • RACI completed.

    Manage, communicate, and test requirements

    The image is the Requirement Gathering Framework graphic from previous sections. In this instance, all parts of the image are greyed out, with the exception of the arrows labelled Communicate and Manage, located at the bottom of the image.

    Although the manage, communicate, and test requirements section chronologically falls as the last section of this blueprint, that does not imply that this section is to be performed only at the end. These tasks are meant to be completed iteratively throughout the project to support the core requirements gathering tasks.

    Prevent requirements scope creep

    Once the stakeholders sign off on the requirements document, any changes need to be tracked and managed. To do that, you need a change control process.

    Thoroughly validating requirements should reduce the amount of change requests you receive. However, eliminating all changes is unavoidable.

    The BAs, sponsor, and stakeholders should have agreed upon a clearly defined scope for the project during the planning phase, but there will almost always be requests for change as the project progresses. Even a high number of small changes can negatively impact the project schedule and budget.

    To avoid scope creep, route all changes, including small ones, through a formal change control process that will be adapted depending on the level of project and impact of the change.

    Linking change requests to requirements is essential to understanding relevance and potential impact

    1. Receive project change request.
    2. Refer to requirements document to identify requirements associated with the change.
      • Matching requirement is found: The change is relevant to the project.
      • Multiple requirements are associated with the proposed change: The change has wider implications for the project and will require closer analysis.
      • The request involves a change or new business requirements: Even if the change is within scope, time, and budget, return to the stakeholder who submitted the request to identify the potentially new requirements that relate to this change. If the sponsor agrees to the new requirements, you may be able to approve the change.
    3. Findings influence decision to escalate/approve/reject change request.

    Develop a change control process

    4.1.1 – 45 minutes

    Input
    • Current change control process
    Output
    • Updated change control process
    Materials
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    Participants
    • BAs
    • Developers
    1. Ask the team to consider their current change control process. It might be helpful to discuss a project that is currently underway, or already completed, to provide context. Draw the process on the whiteboard through discussion with the team.
    2. If necessary, provide some cues. Below are some change control process activities:
      • Submit project change request form.
      • PM assesses change.
      • Project sponsor assesses change.
      • Bring request to project steering committee to assess change.
      • Approve/reject change.
    3. Ask participants to brainstorm a potential separate process for dealing with small changes. Add a new branch for minor changes, which will allow you to make decisions on when to bundle the changes versus implementing directly.

    Document any changes from this exercise in section 7.1 of the Requirements Gathering SOP and BA Playbook.

    Example change control process

    The image is an example of a change control process, depicted via a flowchart.

    Build guidelines for escalating changes

    4.1.2 – 1 hour

    Input
    • Current change control process
    Output
    • Updated change control process
    Materials
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    Participants
    • BAs
    • Developers

    Determine how changes will be escalated for level 1/2/3/4 projects.

    1. Write down the escalation options for level 3 & 4 projects on the whiteboard:
      • Final decision rests with project manager.
      • Escalate to sponsor.
      • Escalate to project steering committee.
      • Escalate to change control board.
    2. Brainstorm categories for assessing the impact of a change and begin creating a chart on the whiteboard by listing these categories in the far left column. Across the top, list the escalation options for level 3 & 4 projects.
    3. Ask the team to agree on escalation conditions for each escalation option. For example, for the final decision to rest with the project manager one condition might be:
      • Change is within original project scope.
    4. Review the output from exercise 4.1.1 and tailor the process model to meet level 3 & 4 escalation models.
    5. Repeat steps 1-4 for level 1 & 2 projects.

    Document any changes from this exercise in section 7.2 of the Requirements Gathering SOP and BA Playbook.

    Example: Change control process – Level 3 & 4

    Impact Category Final Decision Rests With Project Manager If: Escalate to Steering Committee If: Escalate to Change Control Board If: Escalate to Sponsor If:
    Scope
    • Change is within original project scope.
    • Change is out of scope.
    Budget
    • Change can be absorbed into current project budget.
    • Change will require additional funds exceeding any contingency reserves.
    • Change will require the release of contingency reserves.
    Schedule
    • Change can be absorbed into current project schedule.
    • Change will require the final project close date to be delayed.
    • Change will require a delay in key milestone dates.
    Requirements
    • Change can be linked to an existing business requirement.
    • Change will require a change to business requirements, or a new business requirement.

    Example: Change control process – Level 1 & 2

    Impact CategoryFinal Decision Rests With Project Manager If:Escalate to Steering Committee If:Escalate to Sponsor If:
    Scope
    • Change is within original project scope.
    • Change is out of scope.
    Budget
    • Change can be absorbed into current project budget, even if this means releasing contingency funds.
    • Change will require additional funds exceeding any contingency reserves.
    Schedule
    • Change can be absorbed into current project schedule, even if this means moving milestone dates.
    • Change will require the final project close date to be delayed.
    Requirements
    • Change can be linked to an existing business requirement.
    • Change will require a change to business requirements, or a new business requirement.

    Leverage Info-Tech’s Requirements Traceability Matrix to help create end-to-end traceability of your requirements

    4.1 Requirements Traceability Matrix

    Even if you’re not using a dedicated requirements management suite, you still need a way to trace requirements from inception to closure.
    • Ensuring traceability of requirements is key. If you don’t have a dedicated suite, Info-Tech’s Requirements Traceability Matrix can be used as a form of documentation.
    • The traceability matrix covers:
      • Association ID
      • Technical Assumptions and Needs
      • Functional Requirement
      • Status
      • Architectural Documentation
      • Software Modules
      • Test Case Number

    Info-Tech Deliverable
    Take advantage of Info-Tech’s Requirements Traceability Matrix to track requirements from inception through to testing.

    You can’t fully validate what you don’t test; link your requirements management back to your test strategy

    Create a repository to store requirements for reuse on future projects.

    • Reuse previously documented requirements on future projects to save the organization time, money, and grief. Well-documented requirements discovered early can even be reused in the same project.
    • If every module of the application must be able to save or print, then the requirement only needs to be written once. The key is to be able to identify and isolate requirements with a high likelihood of reuse. Typically, requirements pertaining to regulatory and business rule compliance are prime candidates for reuse.
    • Build and share a repository to store historical requirement documentation. The repository must be intuitive and easy to navigate, or users will not take advantage of it. Plan the information hierarchy in advance. Requirements management software suites have the ability to create a repository and easily migrate requirements over from past projects.
    • Assign one person to manage the repository to create consistency and accountability. This person will maintain the master requirements document and ensure the changes that take place during development are reflected in the requirements.

    Confirm your requirements gathering process

    4.1.3 – 45 minutes

    Input
    • Activity 1.2.4
    Output
    • Requirements gathering process model
    Materials
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    Participants
    • BAs

    Review the requirements gathering process and control levels for project levels 1/2/3/4 and add as much detail as possible to each process.

    1. Draw out the requirements gathering process for a level 4 project as created in exercise 1.2.4 on a whiteboard.
    2. Review each process step as a group, and break down each step so that it is at its most granular. Be sure to include each decision point, key documentation, and approvals.
    3. Once complete, review the process for level 3, 2 & 1. Reduce steps as necessary. Note: there may not be a lot of differentiation between your project level 4 & 3 or level 2 & 1 processes. You should see differentiation in your process between 2 and 3.

    Document the output from this exercise in section 2.4 of the Requirements Gathering SOP and BA Playbook.

    Example: Confirm your requirements gathering process

    The image is an example of a requirements gathering process, representing in the format of a flowchart.

    Define RACI for the requirements gathering process

    4.1.4 – 45 minutes

    Input
    • List of stakeholders
    Output
    • RACI matrix
    Materials
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    Participants
    • Business stakeholders

    Understand who is responsible, accountable, consulted, and informed for key elements of the requirements gathering process for project levels 1/2/3/4.

    1. As a group, identify the key stakeholders for requirements gathering and place those names along the top of the board.
    2. On the left side of the board, list the process steps and control points for a level 4 project.
    3. For each process step, identify who is responsible, accountable, informed, and consulted.
    4. Repeat this process for project levels 3, 2 & 1.

    Example: RACI for requirements gathering

    Project Requestor Project Sponsor Customers Suppliers Subject Matter Experts Vendors Executives Project Management IT Management Developer/ Business Analyst Network Services Support
    Intake Form A C C I R
    High-Level Business Case R A C C C C I I C
    Project Classification I I C I R A R
    Project Approval R R I I I I I I A I I
    Project Charter R C R R C R I A I R C C
    Develop BRD R I R C C C R A C C
    Sign-Off on BRD/ Project Charter R A R R R R
    Develop System Requirements C C C R I C A R R
    Sign-Off on SRD R R R I A R R
    Testing/Validation A I R C R C R I R R
    Change Requests R R C C A I R C
    Sign-Off on Change Request R A R R R R
    Final Acceptance R A R I I I I R R R I I

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    4.1.1; 4.1.2 Develop a change control process and guidelines for escalating changes

    An analyst will facilitate the discussion on how to improve upon your organization’s change control processes and how changes will be escalated to ensure effective tracking and management of changes.

    4.1.3 Confirm your requirements gathering process

    With the group, an analyst will review the requirements gathering process and control levels for the different project levels.

    4.1.4 Define the RACI for the requirements gathering process

    An analyst will facilitate a whiteboard exercise to understand who is responsible, accountable, informed, and consulted for key elements of the requirements gathering process.

    Step 4.2: Build Requirements Governance and Communication Plan

    Phase 1

    1.1 Understand the Benefits of Requirements Optimization

    1.2 Determine Your Target State for Requirements Gathering

    Phase 2

    2.1 Determine Elicitation Techniques

    2.2 Structure Elicitation Output

    Phase 3

    3.1 Create Analysis Framework

    3.2 Validate Business Requirements

    Phase 4

    4.1 Create Control Processes for Requirements Changes

    4.2 Build Requirements Governance and Communication Plan

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Developing a requirements gathering steering committee.
    • Identifying and analyzing stakeholders for requirements governance.
    • Creating a communication management plan.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business stakeholders
    • BAs

    Outcomes of this step

    • Requirements governance framework.
    • Communication management plan.

    Establish proper governance for requirements gathering that effectively creates and communicates guiding principles

    If appropriate governance oversight doesn’t exist to create and enforce operating procedures, analysts and developers will run amok with their own processes.

    • One of the best ways to properly govern your requirements gathering process is to establish a working committee within the framework of your existing IT steering committee. This working group should be given the responsibility of policy formulation and oversight for requirements gathering operating procedures. The governance group should be comprised of both business and IT sponsors (e.g. a director, BA, and “voice of the business” line manager).
    • The governance team will not actually be executing the requirements gathering process, but it will be deciding upon which policies to adopt for elicitation, analysis, and validation. The team will also be responsible for ensuring – either directly or indirectly through designated managers – that BAs or other requirements gathering processionals are following the approved steps.

    Requirements Governance Responsibilities

    1. Provide oversight and review of SOPs pertaining to requirements elicitation, analysis, and validation.

    2. Establish corporate policies with respect to requirements gathering SOP training and education of analysts.

    3. Prioritize efforts for requirements optimization.

    4. Determine and track metrics that will be used to gauge the success (or failure) of requirements optimization efforts and make process and policy changes as needed.

    Right-size your governance structure to your organization’s complexity and breadth of capabilities

    Not all organizations will be best served by a formal steering committee for requirements gathering. Assess the complexity of your projects and the number of requirements gathering practitioners to match the right governance structure.

    Level 1: Working Committee
    • A working committee is convened temporarily as required to do periodic reviews of the requirements process (often annually, or when issues are surfaced by practitioners). This governance mechanism works best in small organizations with an ad hoc culture, low complexity projects, and a small number of practitioners.
    Level 2: IT Steering Committee Sub-Group
    • For organizations that already have a formal IT steering committee, a sub-group dedicated to managing the requirements gathering process is desirable to a full committee if most projects are complexity level 1 or 2, and/or there are fewer than ten requirements gathering practitioners.
    Level 3: Requirements Gathering Steering Committee
    • If your requirements gathering process has more than ten practitioners and routinely deals with high-complexity projects (like ERP or CRM), a standing formal committee responsible for oversight of SOPs will provide stronger governance than the first two options.
    Level 4: Requirements Gathering Center of Excellence
    • For large organizations with multiple business units, matrix organizations for BAs, and a very large number of requirements gathering practitioners, a formal center of excellence can provide both governance as well as onboarding and training for requirements gathering.

    Identify and analyze stakeholders

    4.2.1A – 1 hour

    Input
    • Number of practitioners, project complexity levels
    Output
    • Governance structure selection
    Materials
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    Participants
    • Business stakeholders

    Use a power map to determine which governance model best fits your organization.

    The image is a square, split into four equal sections, labelled as follows from top left: Requirements Steering Committee; Requirements Center of Excellence; IT Steering Committee Sub-Group; Working Committee. The left and bottom edges of the square are labelled as follows: on the left, with an arrow pointing upwards, Project Complexity; on the bottom, with arrow pointing right, # of Requirements Practitioners.

    Define your requirements gathering governance structure(s) and purpose

    4.2.1B – 30 minutes

    Input
    • Requirements gathering elicitation, analysis, and validation policies
    Output
    • Governance mandate
    Materials
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    Participants
    • Business stakeholders

    This exercise will help to define the purpose statement for the applicable requirements gathering governance team.

    1. As a group, brainstorm key words that describe the unique role the governance team will play. Consider value, decisions, and authority.
    2. Using the themes, come up with a set of statements that describe the overall purpose statement.
    3. Document the outcome for the final deliverable.

    Example:

    The requirements gathering governance team oversees the procedures that are employed by BAs and other requirements gathering practitioners for [insert company name]. Members of the team are appointed by [insert role] and are accountable to [typically the chair of the committee].

    Day-to-day operations of the requirements gathering team are expected to be at the practitioner (i.e. BA) level. The team is not responsible for conducting elicitation on its own, although members of the team may be involved from a project perspective.

    Document the output from this exercise in section 3.1 of the Requirements Gathering SOP and BA Playbook.

    A benefits provider established a steering committee to provide consistency and standardization in requirements gathering

    CASE STUDY

    Industry Not-for-Profit

    Source Info-Tech Workshop

    Challenge

    This organization is a not-for-profit benefits provider that offers dental coverage to more than 1.5 million people across three states.

    With a wide ranging application portfolio that includes in-house, custom developed applications as well as commercial off-the-shelf solutions, the company had no consistent method of gathering requirements.

    Solution

    The organization contracted Info-Tech to help build an SOP to put in place a rigorous and efficient methodology for requirements elicitation, analysis, and validation.

    One of the key realizations in the workshop was the need for governance and oversight over the requirements gathering process. As a result, the organization developed a Requirements Management Steering Committee to provide strategic oversight and governance over requirements gathering processes.

    Results

    The Requirements Management Steering Committee introduced accountability and oversight into the procedures that are employed by BAs. The Committee’s mandate included:

    • Provide oversight and review SOPs pertaining to requirements elicitation, analysis, and validation.
    • Establish corporate policies with respect to training and education of analysts on requirements gathering SOPs.
    • Prioritize efforts for requirements optimization.
    • Determine metrics that can be used to gauge the success of requirements optimization efforts.

    Authority matrix – RACI

    There needs to be a clear understanding of who is accountable, responsible, consulted, and informed about matters brought to the attention of the requirements gathering governance team.

    • An authority matrix is often used within organizations to indicate roles and responsibilities in relation to processes and activities.
    • Using the RACI model as an example, there is only one person accountable for an activity, although several people may be responsible for executing parts of the activity.
    • In this model, accountable means end-to-end accountability for the process. Accountability should remain with the same person for all activities of a process.

    RResponsible

    The one responsible for getting the job done.

    A – Accountable

    Only one person can be accountable for each task.

    C – Consulted

    Involvement through input of knowledge and information.

    I – Informed

    Receiving information about process execution and quality.

    Define the RACI for effective requirements gathering governance

    4.2.2 – 30 minutes

    Input
    • Members’ list
    Output
    • Governance RACI
    Materials
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes
    Participants
    • Governance team members

    Build the participation list and authority matrix for the requirements gathering governance team.

    1. Have each participant individually consider the responsibilities of the governance team, and write five participant roles they believe should be members of the governance team.
    2. Have each participant place the roles on the whiteboard, group participants, and agree to five participants who should be members.
    3. On the whiteboard, write the responsibilities of the governance team in a column on the left, and place the sticky notes of the participant roles along the top of the board.
    4. Under the appropriate column for each activity, identify who is the “accountable,” “responsible,” “consulted,” and “informed” role for each activity.
    5. Agree to a governance chair.

    Document any changes from this exercise in section 3.1 of the Requirements Gathering SOP and BA Playbook.

    Example: Steps 2-5: Build the governance RACI

    The image shows an example governance RACI, with the top of the chart labelled with Committee Participants, and the left hand column labelled Committee Responsibilities. Some of the boxes have been filled in.

    Define your requirements gathering governance team procedures, cadence, and agenda

    4.2.3 – 30 minutes

    Input
    • Governance responsibilities
    Output
    • Governance procedures and agenda
    Materials
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    Participants
    • Steering committee members

    Define your governance team procedures, cadence, and agenda.

    1. Review the format of a typical agenda as well as the list of responsibilities for the governance team.
    2. Consider how you will address each of these responsibilities in the meeting, who needs to present, and how long each presentation should be.
    3. Add up the times to define the meeting duration.
    4. Consider how often you need to meet to discuss the information: monthly, quarterly, or annually? Are there different actions that need to be taken at different points in the year?
    5. As a group, decide how the governance team will approve changes and document any voting standards that should be included in the charter. Will a vote be taken during or prior to the meeting? Who will have the authority to break a tie?
    6. As a group, decide how the committee will review information and documentation. Will members commit to reviewing associated documents before the meeting? Can associated documentation be stored in a knowledge repository and/or be distributed to members prior to the meeting? Who will be responsible for this? Can a short meeting/conference call be held with relevant reviewers to discuss documentation before the official committee meeting?

    Review the format of a typical agenda

    4.2.3 – 30 minutes

    Meeting call to order [Committee Chair] [Time]
    Roll call [Committee Chair] [Time]
    Review of SOPs
    A. Requirements gathering dashboard review [Presenters, department] [Time]
    B. Review targets [Presenters, department] [Time]
    C. Policy Review [Presenters, department] [Time]

    Define the governance procedures and cadence

    4.2.3 – 30 minutes

    • The governance team or committee will be chaired by [insert role].
    • The team shall meet on a [insert time frame (e.g. monthly, semi-annual, annual)] basis. These meetings will be scheduled by the team or committee chair or designated proxy.
    • Approval for all SOP changes will be reached through a [insert vote consensus criteria (majority, uncontested, etc.)] vote of the governance team. The vote will be administered by the governance chair. Each member of the committee shall be entitled to one vote, excepting [insert exceptions].
    • The governance team has the authority to reject any requirements gathering proposal which it deems not to have made a sufficient case or which does not significantly contribute to the strategic objectives of [insert company name].
    • [Name of individual] will record and distribute the meeting minutes and documentation of business to be discussed in the meeting.

    Document any changes from this exercise in section 3.1 of the Requirements Gathering SOP and BA Playbook.

    Changing the requirements gathering process can be disruptive – be successful by gaining business support

    A successful communication plan involves making the initiative visible and creating staff awareness around it. Educate the organization on how the requirements gathering process will differ.

    People can be adverse to change and may be unreceptive to being told they must “comply” to new policies and procedures. Demonstrate the value in requirements gathering and show how it will assist people in their day-to-day activities.

    By demonstrating how an improved requirements gathering process will impact staff directly, you create a deeper level of understanding across lines-of-business, and ultimately a higher level of acceptance for new processes, rules, and guidelines.

    A proactive communication plan will:
    • Assist in overcoming issues with prioritization, alignment resourcing, and staff resistance.
    • Provide a formalized process for implementing new policies, rules, and guidelines.
    • Detail requirements gathering ownership and accountability for the entirety of the process.
    • Encourage acceptance and support of the initiative.

    Identify and analyze stakeholders to communicate the change process

    Who are the requirements gathering stakeholders?

    Stakeholder:

    • A stakeholder is any person, group, or organization who is the end user, owner, sponsor, or consumer of an IT project, change, or application.
    • When assessing an individual or group, ask whether they can impact or be impacted by any decision, change, or activity executed as part of the project. This might include individuals outside of the organization.

    Key Stakeholder:

    • Someone in a management role or someone with decision-making power who will be able to influence requirements and/or be impacted by project outcomes.

    User Group Representatives:

    • For impacted user groups, follow best practice and engage an individual to act as a representative. This individual will become the primary point of contact when making decisions that impact the group.

    Identify the reasons for resistance to change

    Stakeholders may resist change for a variety of reasons, and different strategies are necessary to address each.

    Unwilling – Individuals who are unwilling to change may need additional encouragement. For these individuals, you’ll need to reframe the situation and emphasize how the change will benefit them specifically.

    Unable – All involved requirements gathering will need some form of training on the process, committee roles, and responsibilities. Be sure to have training and support available for employees who need it and communicate this to staff.

    Unaware – Until people understand exactly what is going on, they will not be able to conform to the process. Communicate change regularly at the appropriate detail to encourage stakeholder support.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Resisters who have influence present a high risk to the implementation as they may encourage others to resist as well. Know where and why each stakeholder is likely to resist to mitigate risk. A detailed plan will ensure you have the needed documentation and communications to successfully manage stakeholder resistance.

    Identify and analyze stakeholders

    4.2.4 – 1 hour

    Input
    • Requirements gathering stakeholders list
    Output
    • Stakeholder power map
    Materials
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes
    Participants
    • RGSC members

    Identify the impact and level of resistance of all stakeholders to come up with the right communication plan.

    1. Through discussion, generate a complete list of stakeholders for requirements gathering and record the names on the whiteboard or flip chart. Group related stakeholders together.
    2. Using the template on the next slide, draw the stakeholder power map.
    3. Evaluate each stakeholder on the list based on:
      1. Influence: To what degree can this stakeholder impact progress?
      2. Involvement: How involved is the stakeholder already?
      3. Support: Label supporters with green sticky notes, resisters with red notes, and the rest with a third color.
    4. Based on the assessment, write the stakeholder’s name on a green, red, or other colored sticky note, and place the sticky note in the appropriate place on the power map.
    5. For each of the stakeholders identified as resisters, determine why you think they would be resistant. Is it because they are unwilling, unable, and/or unknowing?
    6. Document changes to the stakeholder analysis in the Requirements Gathering Communication Tracking Template.

    Identify and analyze stakeholders

    4.2.4 – 1 hour

    Use a power map to plot key stakeholders according to influence and involvement.

    The image shows a power map, which is a square divided into 4 equally-sized sections, labelled from top left: Focused Engagement; Key Players; Keep Informed; Minimal Engagement. On the left side of the square, there is an arrow pointing upwards labelled Influence; at the bottom of the square, there is an arrow pointing right labelled Involvement. On the right side of the image, there is a legend indicating that a green dot indicates a Supporter; a grey dot indicated Neutral; and a red dot indicates a Resister.

    Example: Identify and analyze stakeholders

    Use a power map to plot key stakeholders according to influence and involvement.

    The image is the same power map image from the previous section, with some additions. A red dot is located at the top left, with a note: High influence with low involvement? You need a strategy to increase engagement. A green dot is located mid-high on the right hand side. Grey dots are located left and right in the bottom of the map. The bottom right grey dot has the note: High involvement with lower influence? Make sure to keep these stakeholders informed at regular intervals and monitor engagement.

    Stakeholder analysis: Reading the power map

    High Risk:

    Stakeholders with high influence who are not as involved in the project or are heavily impacted by the project are less likely to give feedback throughout the project lifecycle and need to be engaged. They are not as involved but have the ability to impact project success, so stay one step ahead.

    Do not limit your engagement to kick-off and close – you need to continue seeking input and support at all stages of the project.

    Mid Risk:

    Key players have high influence, but they are also more involved with the project or impacted by its outcomes and are thus easier to engage.

    Stakeholders who are heavily impacted by project outcomes will be essential to your organizational change management strategy. Do not wait until implementation to engage them in preparing the organization to accept the project – make them change champions.

    Low Risk:

    Stakeholders with low influence who are not impacted by the project do not pose as great of a risk, but you need to keep them consistently informed of the project and involve them at the appropriate control points to collect feedback and approval.

    Inputs to the communications plan

    Stakeholder analysis should drive communications planning.

    Identify Stakeholders
    • Who is impacted by this project?
    • Who can affect project outcomes?
    Assess Stakeholders
    • Influence
    • Involvement
    • Support
    Stakeholder Change Impact Assessment
    • Identify change supporters/resistors and craft change messages to foster acceptance.
    Stakeholder Register
    • Record assessment results and preferred methods of communication.
    The Communications Management Plan:
    • Who will receive information?
    • What information will be distributed?
    • How will information be distributed?
    • What is the frequency of communication?
    • What will the level of detail be?
    • Who is responsible for distributing information?

    Communicate the reason for the change and stay on message throughout the change

    Leaders of successful change spend considerable time developing a powerful change message: a compelling narrative that articulates the desired end state and makes the change concrete and meaningful to staff. They create the change vision with staff to build ownership and commitment.

    The change message should:

    • Explain why the change is needed.
    • Summarize the things that will stay the same.
    • Highlight the things that will be left behind.
    • Emphasize the things that are being changed.
    • Explain how the change will be implemented.
    • Address how the change will affect the various roles in the organization.
    • Discuss staff’s role in making the change successful.

    The five elements of communicating the reason for the change:

    COMMUNICATING THE CHANGE

    What is the change?

    Why are we doing it?

    How are we going to go about it?

    How long will it take us?

    What will the role be for each department and individual?

    Create a communications management plan

    4.2.5 – 45 minutes

    Input
    • Exercise 4.1.1
    Output
    • Communications management plan
    Materials
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    Participants
    • RGSC members

    Build the communications management plan around your stakeholders’ needs.

    1. Build a chart on the board using the template on the next slide.
    2. Using the list from exercise 4.1.1, brainstorm a list of communication vehicles that will need to be used as part of the rollout plan (e.g. status updates, training).
    3. Through group discussion, fill in all these columns for at least three communication vehicles:
      • (Target) audience
      • Purpose (description)
      • Frequency (of the communication)
        • The method, frequency, and content of communication vehicles will change depending on the stakeholder involved. This needs to be reflected by your plan. For example, you may have several rows for “Status Report” to cover the different stakeholders who will be receiving it.
      • Owner (of the message)
      • Distribution (method)
      • (Level of) details
        • High/medium/low + headings
    4. Document your stakeholder analysis in the Requirements Gathering Communication Tracking Template.

    Communications plan template

    4.2.5 – 45 minutes

    Sample communications plan: Status reports

    Vehicle Audience Purpose Frequency Owner Distribution Level of Detail
    Communications Guidelines
    • Regardless of complexity, it is important not to overwhelm stakeholders with information that is not relevant to them. Sending more detailed information than is necessary might mean that it does not get read.
    • Distributing reports too widely may lead to people assuming that someone else is reading it, causing them to neglect reading it themselves.
    • Only distribute reports to the stakeholders who need the information. Think about what information that stakeholder requires to feel comfortable.

    Example: Identify and analyze stakeholders

    Sample communications plan: Status reports

    Vehicle Audience Purpose Frequency Owner Distribution Level of Detail
    Status Report Sponsor Project progress and deliverable status Weekly Project Manager Email

    Details for

    • Milestones
    • Deliverables
    • Budget
    • Schedule
    • Issues
    Status Report Line of Business VP Project progress Monthly Project Manager Email

    High Level for

    • Major milestone update

    Build your requirements gathering process implementation timeline

    4.2.6 – 45 minutes

    Input
    • Parking lot items
    Output
    • Implementation timeline
    Materials
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes
    Participants
    • RGSC members

    Build a high-level timeline for the implementation.

    1. Collect the action items identified throughout the week in the “parking lot.”
    2. Individually or in groups, brainstorm any additional action items. Consider communication, additional training required, approvals, etc.
      • Write these on sticky notes and add them to the parking lot with the others.
    3. As a group, start organizing these notes into logical groupings.
    4. Assign each of the tasks to a person or group.
    5. Identify any risks or dependencies.
    6. Assign each of the tasks to a timeline.
    7. Following the exercise, the facilitator will convert this into a Gantt chart using the roadmap for requirements gathering action plan.

    Step 3: Organize the action items into logical groupings

    4.2.6 – 45 minutes

    The image shows a board with 5 categories: Documentation, Approval, Communication, Process, and Training. There are groups of post-it notes under each category title.

    Steps 4-6: Organize the action items into logical groupings

    4.2.6 – 45 minutes

    This image shows a chart with Action Items to be listed in the left-most column, Person or Group Responsible in the next column, Risks/Dependencies in the next columns, and periods of time (i.e. 1-3 months, 2-6 months, etc.) in the following columns. The chart has been partially filled in as an exemplar.

    Recalculate the selected requirements gathering metrics

    Measure and monitor the benefits of requirements gathering optimization.

    • Reassess the list of selected and captured requirements management metrics.
    • Recalculate the metrics and analyze any changes. Don’t expect a substantial result after the first attempt. It will take a while for BAs to adjust to the Info-Tech Requirements Gathering Framework. After the third project, results will begin to materialize.
    • Understand that the project complexity and business significance will also affect how long it takes to see results. The ideal projects to beta the process on would be of low complexity and high business significance.
    • Realize that poor requirements gathering can have negative effects on the morale of BAs, IT, and project managers. Don’t forget to capture the impact of these through surveys.

    Major KPIs typically used for benchmarking include:

    • Number of application bugs/defects (for internally developed applications).
    • Number of support requests or help desk tickets for the application, controlled for user deployment levels.
    • Overall project cycle time.
    • Overall project cost.
    • Requirements gathering as a percentage of project time.

    Revisit the requirements gathering metrics selected in the planning phase and recalculate them after requirements gathering optimization has been attempted.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    4.2.1; 4.2.2; 4.2.3 – Build a requirements gathering steering committee

    The analyst will facilitate the discussion to define the purpose statement of the steering committee, build the participation list and authority matrix for its members, and define the procedures and agenda.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    4.2.4 Identify and analyze stakeholders

    An analyst will facilitate the discussion on how to identify the impact and level of resistance of all stakeholders to come up with the communication plan.

    4.2.5 Create a communications management plan

    An analyst will assist the team in building the communications management plan based on the stakeholders’ needs that were outlined in the stakeholder analysis exercise.

    4.2.6 Build a requirements gathering implementation timeline

    An analyst will facilitate a session to brainstorm and document any action items and build a high-level timeline for implementation.

    Insight breakdown

    Requirements gathering SOPs should be prescriptive based on project complexity.

    • Complex projects will require more analytical rigor. Simpler projects can be served by more straightforward techniques such as user stories.

    Requirements gathering management tools can be pricy, but they can also be beneficial.

    • Requirements gathering management tools are a great way to have full control over recording, analyzing, and categorizing requirements over complex projects.

    BAs can make or break the execution of the requirements gathering process.

    • A strong process still needs to be executed well by BAs with the right blend of skills and knowledge.

    Summary of accomplishment

    Knowledge Gained

    • Best practices for each stage of the requirements gathering framework:
      • Elicitation
      • Analysis
      • Validation
    • A clear understanding of BA competencies and skill sets necessary to successfully execute the requirements gathering process.

    Processes Optimized

    • Stakeholder identification and management.
    • Requirements elicitation, analysis, and validation.
    • Requirements gathering governance.
    • Change control processes for new requirements.
    • Communication processes for requirements gathering.

    Deliverables Completed

    • SOPs for requirements gathering.
    • Project level selection framework.
    • Communications framework for requirements gathering.
    • Requirements documentation standards.

    Organizations and experts who contributed to this research

    Interviews

    • Douglas Van Gelder, IT Manager, Community Development Commission of the County of Los Angeles
    • Michael Lyons, Transit Management Analyst, Metropolitan Transit Authority
    • Ken Piddington, CIO, MRE Consulting
    • Thomas Dong, Enterprise Software Manager, City of Waterloo
    • Chad Evans, Director of IT, Ontario Northland
    • Three anonymous contributors

    Note: This research also incorporates extensive insights and feedback from our advisory service and related research projects.

    Bibliography

    “10 Ways Requirements Can Sabotage Your Projects Right From the Start.” Blueprint Software Systems, 2012. Web.

    “BPM Definition.” BPMInstitute.org, n.d. Web.

    “Capturing the Value of Project Management.” PMI’s Pulse of the Profession, 2015. Web.

    Eby, Kate. “Demystifying the 5 Phases of Project Management.” Smartsheet, 29 May 2019. Web.

    “Product Management: MoSCoW Prioritization.” ProductPlan, n.d. Web.

    “Projects Delivered on Time & on Budget Result in Larger Market Opportunities.” Jama Software, 2015. Web.

    “SIPOC Table.” iSixSigma, n.d. Web.

    “Survey Principles.” University of Wisconsin-Madison, n.d. Web.

    “The Standish Group 2015 Chaos Report.” The Standish Group, 2015. Web.

    Reduce Time to Consensus With an Accelerated Business Case

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}286|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.5/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $12,999 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 5 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Business Analysis
    • Parent Category Link: /business-analysis
    • Enterprise application initiatives are complex, expensive, and require a significant amount of planning before initiation.
    • A financial business case is sometimes used to justify these initiatives.
    • Once the business case (and benefits therein) are approved, the case is forgotten, eliminating a critical check and balance of benefit realization.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    1. Frame the conversation.

    Understand the audience and forum for the business case to best frame the conversation.

    2. Time-box the process of building the case.

    More time should be spent on performing the action rather than building the case.

    3. The business case is a living document.

    The business case creates the basis for review of the realization of the proposed business benefits once the procurement is complete.

    Impact and Result

    • Understand the drivers for decision making in your organization, and the way initiatives are evaluated.
    • Compile a compelling business case that provides decision makers with sufficient information to make decisions confidently.
    • Evaluate proposed enterprise application initiatives “apples-to-apples” using a standardized and repeatable methodology.
    • Provide a mechanism for tracking initiative performance during and after implementation.

    Reduce Time to Consensus With an Accelerated Business Case Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should build a business case for enterprise application investments, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand how we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Gather the required information

    Complete the necessary preceding tasks to building the business case. Rationalize the initiative under consideration, determine the organizational decision flow following a stakeholder assessment, and conduct market research to understand the options.

    • Reduce Time to Consensus With an Accelerated Business Case – Phase 1: Gather the Required Information
    • Business Case Readiness Checklist
    • Business Case Workbook
    • Request for Information Template
    • Request for Quotation Template

    2. Conduct the business case analysis

    Conduct a thorough assessment of the initiative in question. Define the alternatives under consideration, identify tangible and intangible benefits for each, aggregate the costs, and highlight any risks.

    • Reduce Time to Consensus With an Accelerated Business Case – Phase 2: Conduct the Business Case Analysis

    3. Make the case

    Finalize the recommendation based on the analysis and create a business case presentation to frame the conversation for key stakeholders.

    • Reduce Time to Consensus With an Accelerated Business Case – Phase 3: Make the Case
    • Full-Form Business Case Presentation Template
    • Summary Business Case Presentation Template
    • Business Case Change Log
    • Business Case Close-Out Form
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Reduce Time to Consensus With an Accelerated Business Case

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Plan for Business Case Development

    The Purpose

    Complete the necessary preceding tasks to building a strong business case.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Alignment with business objectives.

    Stakeholder buy-in.

    Activities

    1.1 Map the decision flow in your organization.

    1.2 Define the proposed initiative.

    1.3 Define the problem/opportunity statement.

    1.4 Clarify goals and objectives expected from the initiative.

    Outputs

    Decision traceability

    Initiative summary

    Problem/opportunity statement

    Business objectives

    2 Build the Business Case Model

    The Purpose

    Put together the key elements of the business case including alternatives, benefits, and costs.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Rationalize the business case.

    Activities

    2.1 Design viable alternatives.

    2.2 Identify the tangible and intangible benefits.

    2.3 Assess current and future costs.

    2.4 Create the financial business case model.

    Outputs

    Shortlisted alternatives

    Benefits tracking model

    Total cost of ownership

    Impact analysis

    3 Enhance the Business Case

    The Purpose

    Determine more integral factors in the business case such as ramp-up time for benefits realization as well as risk assessment.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Complete a comprehensive case.

    Activities

    3.1 Determine ramp-up times for costs and benefits.

    3.2 Identify performance measures and tracking.

    3.3 Assess initiative risk.

    Outputs

    Benefits realization schedule

    Performance tracking framework

    Risk register

    4 Prepare the Business Case

    The Purpose

    Finalize the recommendation and formulate the business case summary and presentation.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Prepare the business case presentation.

    Activities

    4.1 Choose the alternative to be recommended.

    4.2 Create the detailed and summary business case presentations.

    4.3 Present and incorporate feedback.

    4.4 Monitor and close out.

    Outputs

    Final recommendation

    Business case presentation

    Final sign-off

    Implement and Mature Your User Experience Design Practice

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}430|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Requirements & Design
    • Parent Category Link: /requirements-and-design

    Many organizations want to get to market quickly and on budget but don’t know the steps to get the right product/service to satisfy the users and business. This may be made apparent through uninformed decisions leading to lack of adoption of your product or service, rework due to post-implementation user feedback, or the competition discovering new approaches that outshine yours.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Ensure your practice has a clear understanding of the design problem space – not just the solution. An understanding of the user is critical to this.

    Impact and Result

    • Create a practice that is focused on human outcomes; it starts and ends with the people you are designing for. This includes:
      • Establishing a practice with a common vision.
      • Enhancing the practice through four design factors.
      • Communicating a roadmap to improve your business through design.
    • Create a practice that develops solutions specific to the needs of users, customers, and stakeholders.

    Implement and Mature Your User Experience Design Practice Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should implement an experience design practice, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four dimensions we recommend using to mature your practice.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Build the foundation

    Motivate your team with a common vision, mission, and goals.

    • Design Roadmap Workbook
    • User Experience Practice Roadmap

    2. Review the design dimensions

    Examine your practice – from the perspectives of organizational alignment, business outcomes, design perspective, and design integration – to determine what it takes to improve your maturity.

    3. Build your roadmap and communications

    Bring it all together – determine your team structure, the roadmap for the practice maturity, and communication plan.

    [infographic]

    Workshop: Implement and Mature Your User Experience Design Practice

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Answer “So What?”

    The Purpose

    Make the case for UX. Bring the team together with a common mission, vision, and goals.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Mission, vision, and goals for design

    Activities

    1.1 Define design practice goals.

    1.2 Generate the vision statement.

    1.3 Develop the mission statement.

    Outputs

    Design vision statement

    Design mission statement

    Design goals

    2 Examine Design Dimensions

    The Purpose

    Review the dimensions that help organizations to mature, and assess what next steps make sense for your organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Develop initiatives that are right-sized for your organization.

    Activities

    2.1 Examine organizational alignment.

    2.2 Establish priorities for initiatives.

    2.3 Identify business value sources.

    2.4 Identify design perspective.

    2.5 Brainstorm design integration.

    2.6 Complete UCD-Canvas.

    Outputs

    Documented initiatives for design maturity

    Design canvas framework

    3 Create Structure and Initiatives

    The Purpose

    Make your design practice structure right for you.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Examine patterns and roles for your organization.

    Activities

    3.1 Structure your design practice.

    Outputs

    Design practice structure with patterns

    4 Roadmap and Communications

    The Purpose

    Define the communications objectives and audience for your roadmap.

    Develop your communication plan.

    Sponsor check-in.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Complete in-progress deliverables from previous four days.

    Set up review time for workshop deliverables and to discuss next steps.

    Activities

    4.1 Define the communications objectives and audience for your roadmap.

    4.2 Develop your communication plan.

    Outputs

    Communication Plan and Roadmap

    Achieve Digital Resilience by Managing Digital Risk

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}375|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $123,999 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 4 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Governance, Risk & Compliance
    • Parent Category Link: /governance-risk-compliance

    Businesses are expected to balance achieving innovation through initiatives that transform the organization with effective risk management. While this is nothing new, added challenges arise due to:

    • An increasingly large vendor ecosystem within which to manage risk.
    • A fragmented approach to risk management that separates cyber and IT risk from enterprise risk.
    • A rapidly growing number of threat actors and a larger attack surface.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • All risks are digital risks.
    • Manage digital risk with a collaborative approach that supports digital transformation, ensures digital resilience, and distributes responsibility for digital risk management across the organization.

    Impact and Result

    Address digital risk to build digital resilience. In the process, you will drive transformation and maintain digital trust among your employees, end users, and consumers by:

    • Defining digital risk, including primary risk categories and prevalent risk factors.
    • Leveraging industry examples to help identify external risk considerations.
    • Building a digital risk profile, addressing core risk categories, and creating a correlating plan for digital risk management.

    Achieve Digital Resilience by Managing Digital Risk Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Risk does not exist in isolation and must extend beyond your cyber and IT teams. Read our concise Executive Brief to find out how to manage digital risk to help drive digital transformation and build your organization's digital resilience.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Redefine digital risk and resilience

    Discover an overview of what digital risk is, learn how to assess risk factors for the five primary categories of digital risk, see several industry-specific scenarios, and explore how to plan for and mitigate identified risks.

    • Achieve Digital Resilience by Managing Digital Risk – Phases 1-2
    • Digital Risk Management Charter

    2. Build your digital risk profile

    Begin building the digital risk profile for your organization, identify where your key areas of risk exposure exist, and assign ownership and accountability among the organization’s business units.

    • Digital Risk Profile Tool
    • Digital Risk Management Executive Report
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Achieve Digital Resilience by Managing Digital Risk

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Scope and Define Digital Risk

    The Purpose

    Develop an understanding and standard definition of what digital risk is, who it impacts, and its relevance to the organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understand what digital risk means and how it differs from traditional enterprise or cybersecurity risk.

    Develop a definition of digital risk that recognizes the unique external and internal considerations of your organization.

    Activities

    1.1 Review the business context

    1.2 Review the current roles of enterprise, IT, and cyber risk management within the organization

    1.3 Define digital transformation and list transformation initiatives

    1.4 Define digital risk in the context of the organization

    1.5 Define digital resilience in the context of the organization

    Outputs

    Digital risk drivers

    Applicable definition of digital risk

    Applicable definition of digital resilience

    2 Make the Case for Digital Risk Management

    The Purpose

    Understand the roles digital risk management and your digital risk profile have in helping your organization achieve safe, transformative growth.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    An overview and understanding of digital risk categories and subsequent individual digital risk factors for the organization

    Industry considerations that highlight the importance of managing digital risk

    A structured approach to managing the categories of digital risk

    Activities

    2.1 Review and discuss industry case studies and industry examples of digital transformation and digital risk

    2.2 Revise the organization's list of digital transformation initiatives (past, current, and future)

    2.3 Begin to build your organization's Digital Risk Management Charter (with inputs from Module 1)

    2.4 Revise, customize, and complete a Digital Risk Management Charter for the organization

    Outputs

    Digital Risk Management Charter

    Industry-specific digital risks, factors, considerations, and scenarios

    The organization's digital risks mapped to its digital transformation initiatives

    3 Build Your Digital Risk Profile

    The Purpose

    Develop an initial digital risk profile that identifies the organization’s core areas of focus in managing digital risk.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A unique digital risk profile for the organization

    Digital risk management initiatives that are mapped against the organization's current strategic initiatives and aligned to meet your digital resilience objectives and benchmarks

    Activities

    3.1 Review category control questions within the Digital Risk Profile Tool

    3.2 Complete all sections (tabs) within the Digital Risk Profile Tool

    3.3 Assess the results of your Digital Risk Profile Tool

    3.4 Discuss and assign initial weightings for ownership of digital risk among the organization's stakeholders

    Outputs

    Completion of all category tabs within the Digital Risk Profile Tool

    Initial stakeholder ownership assignments of digital risk categories

    4 Manage Your Digital Risk

    The Purpose

    Refine the digital risk management plan for the organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A targeted, organization-specific approach to managing digital risk as a part of the organization's projects and initiatives on an ongoing basis

    An executive presentation that outlines digital risk management for your senior leadership team

    Activities

    4.1 Conduct brief information sessions with the relevant digital risk stakeholders identified in Module 3.

    4.2 Review and revise the organization's Digital Risk Profile as necessary, including adjusting weightings for the digital risk categories

    4.3 Begin to build an actionable digital risk management plan

    4.4 Present your findings to the organization's relevant risk leaders and executive team

    Outputs

    A finalized and assessed Digital Risk Profile Tool

    Stakeholder ownership for digital risk management

    A draft Digital Risk Management plan and Digital Risk Management Executive Report

    Simplify Remote Deployment With Zero-Touch Provisioning

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}310|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $5,199 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 5 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: End-User Computing Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /end-user-computing-strategy

    Provide better end-user device support to a remote workforce:

    • Remain compliant while purchasing, deploying, supporting, and decommissioning devices.
    • Save time and resources during device deployment while providing a high-quality experience to remote end users.
    • Build a set of capabilities that will let you support different use cases.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Zero-touch is more than just deployment. This is more difficult than turning on a tool and provisioning new devices to end users.
    • Consider the entire user experience and device lifecycle to show value to the organization. Don’t forget that you will eventually need to touch the device.

    Impact and Result

    Approach zero-touch provisioning and patching from the end user’s experience:

    • Align your zero-touch approach with stakeholder priorities and larger IT strategies.
    • Build your zero-touch provisioning and patching plan from both the asset lifecycle and the end-user perspective to take a holistic approach that emphasizes customer service.
    • Tailor deployment plans to more easily scope and resource deployment projects.

    Simplify Remote Deployment With Zero-Touch Provisioning Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should adopt zero-touch provisioning, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Design the zero-touch experience

    Design the user’s experience and build a vision to direct your zero-touch provisioning project. Update your ITAM practices to reflect the new experience.

    • Zero-Touch Provisioning and Support Plan
    • HAM Process Workflows (Visio)
    • HAM Process Workflows (PDF)
    • End-User Device Management Standard Operating Procedure

    2. Update device management, provisioning, and patching

    Leverage new tools to manage remote endpoints, keep those devices patched, and allow users to get the apps they need to work.

    • End-User Device Build Book Template

    3. Build a roadmap and communication plan

    Create a roadmap for migrating to zero-touch provisioning.

    • Roadmap Tool
    • Communication Plan Template
    [infographic]

    Quality Management

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}45|cart{/j2store}
    • Related Products: {j2store}45|crosssells{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Service Planning and Architecture
    • Parent Category Link: /service-planning-and-architecture
    Drive efficiency and agility with right-sized quality management

    Enterprise Storage Solution Considerations

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}507|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Storage & Backup Optimization
    • Parent Category Link: /storage-and-backup-optimization
    • Enterprise storage technology and options are challenging to understand.
    • There are so many options. How do you decide what the best solution is for your storage challenge??
    • Where do you start when trying to solve your enterprise storage challenge?

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Take the time to understand the various data storage formats, disk types, and associated technology, as well as the cloud-based and on-premises options. This will help you select the right tool for your needs.

    Impact and Result

    Look to existing use cases based on actual Info-Tech analyst calls to help in your decision-making process.

    Enterprise Storage Solution Considerations Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Enterprise Storage Solution Considerations – Narrow your focus with the right product type and realize efficiencies.

    Explore the building blocks of enterprise storage so you can select the best solution, narrow your focus with the correct product type, explore the features that should be considered when evaluating enterprise storage offerings, and examine use cases based on actual Info-Tech analyst calls to find a storage solution for your situation.

    • Enterprise Storage Solution Considerations Storyboard

    2. Modernize Enterprise Storage Workbook – Understand your data requirements.

    The first step in solving your enterprise storage challenge is identifying your data sources, data volumes, and growth rates. This information will give you insight into what data sources could be stored on premises or in the cloud, how much storage you will require for the coming five to ten years, and what to consider when exploring enterprise storage solutions. This tool can be a valuable asset for determining your current storage drivers and future storage needs, structuring a plan for future storage purchases, and determining timelines and total cost of ownership.

    • Modernize Enterprise Storage Workbook
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Enterprise Storage Solution Considerations

    Narrow your focus with the right product type and realize efficiencies.

    Analyst Perspective

    The vendor landscape is continually evolving, as are the solutions they offer. The options and features are increasing and appealing.

    The image contains a picture of P.J. Ryan.

    To say that the current enterprise storage landscape looks interesting would be an understatement. The solutions offered by vendors continue to grow and evolve. Flash and NVMe are increasing the speed of storage media and reducing latency. Software-defined storage is finding the most efficient use of media to store data where it is best served while managing a variety of vendor storage and older storage area networks and network-attached storage devices.

    Storage as a service is taking on a new meaning with creative solutions that let you keep the storage appliance on premises or in a colocated data center while administration, management, and support are performed by the vendor for a nominal monthly fee.

    We cannot discuss enterprise storage without mentioning the cloud. Bring a thermometer because you must understand the difference between hot, warm, and cold storage when discussing the cloud options. Very hot and very cold may also come into play.

    Storage hardware can assume a higher total cost of ownership with support options that replace the controllers on a regular basis. The options with this type of service are also varied, but the concept of not having to replace all disks and chassis nor go through a data migration is very appealing to many companies.

    The cloud is growing in popularity when it comes to enterprise storage, but on-premises solutions are still in demand, and whether you choose cloud or on premises, you can be guaranteed an array of features and options to add stability, security, and efficiency to your enterprise storage.

    P.J. Ryan
    Research Director, Infrastructure & Operations
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Info-Tech Insight

    The vendor landscape is continually evolving, as are the solutions they offer.

    Storage providers are getting acquired by bigger players, “outside the box” thinking is disrupting the storage support marketplace, “as a service” storage offerings are evolving, and what is a data lake and do I need one? The traditional storage vendors are not alone in the market, and the solutions they offer are no longer traditional either. Explore the landscape and understand your options before you make any enterprise storage solution purchases.

    Understand the building blocks of storage so you can select the best solution.

    There are multiple storage formats for data, along with multiple hardware form factors and disk types to hold those various data formats. Software plays a significant role in many of these storage solutions, and cloud offerings take advantage of all the various formats, form factors, and disks. The challenge is matching your data type with the correct storage format and solution.

    Look to existing use cases to help in your decision-making process.

    Explore previous experiences from others by reading use cases to determine what the best solution is for your challenge. You’re probably not the first to encounter the challenge you’re facing. Another organization may have previously reached out for assistance and found a viable solution that may be just what you also need.

    Enterprise storage has evolved, with more options than ever

    Data is growing, data security will always be a concern, and vendors are providing more and more options for enterprise storage.

    “By 2025, it’s estimated that 463 exabytes of data will be created each day globally – that’s the equivalent of 212,765,957 DVDs per day!” (Visual Capitalist)

    “Modern criminal groups target not only endpoints and servers, but also central storage systems and their backup infrastructure.” (Continuity Software)

    Cloud or on premises? Maybe a hybrid approach with both cloud and on premises is best for you. Do you want to remove the headaches of storage administration, management, and support with a fully managed storage-as-a-service solution? Would you like to upgrade your controllers every three or four years without a major service interruption? The options are increasing and appealing.

    High-Level Considerations

    1. Understand Your Data

    Understand how much data you have and where it is located. This will be crucial when evaluating enterprise storage solutions.

    2. Plan for Growth

    Your enterprise storage considerations should include your data needs now and in the future.

    3. Understand the Mechanics

    Take the time to understand the various data storage formats, disk types, and associated technology, as well as the cloud-based and on-premises options. This will help you select the right tool for your needs.

    Storage formats, disk drives, and technology

    Common data storage formats, technology, and drive types are outlined below. Understanding how data is stored as well as the core building blocks for larger systems will help you decide which solution is best for your storage needs.

    Format

    What it is

    Disk Drives and Technology

    File Storage

    File storage is hierarchical storage that uses files, folders, subfolders, and directories. You enter a specific filename and path to access the file, such as P:\users\johndoe\strategy\cloud.doc. If you ever saved a file on a server, you used file storage. File storage is usually managed by some type of file manager, such as File Explorer in Windows. Network-attached storage (NAS) devices use file storage.

    Hard Disk Drives (HDD)

    HDD use a platter of spinning disks to magnetically store data. The disks are thick enough to make them rigid and are referred to as hard disks.

    HDD is older technology but is still in demand and offered by vendors.

    Object Storage

    Object storage is when data is broken into distinct units, called objects. These objects are stored in a flat, non-hierarchical structure in a single location or repository. Each object is identified by its associated ID and metadata. Objects are accessed by an application programming interface (API).

    Flash

    Flash storage uses flash memory chips to store data. The flash memory chips are written with electricity and contain no moving parts. Flash storage is very fast, which is how the technology got its name (“Flash vs. SSD Storage,” Enterprise Storage Forum, 2018).

    Block Storage

    Block storage is when data is divided up into fixed-size blocks and stored with a unique identifier. Blocks can be stored in different environments, such as Windows or Linux. Storage area networks (SANs) use block storage.

    Solid-State Drive (SSD)

    SSD is a storage mechanism that also does not use any moving parts. Most SSD drives use flash storage, but other options are available for SSD.

    Nonvolatile Memory Express (NVMe)

    NVMe is a communications standard developed specially for SSDs by a consortium of vendors including Intel, Samsung, SanDisk, Dell, and Seagate. It operates across the PCIe bus (hence the “Express” in the name), which allows the drives to act more like the fast memory that they are rather than the hard disks they imitate (PCWorld).

    Narrow your focus with the right product type

    On-premises enterprise storage solutions fit into a few distinct product types.

    Network-Attached Storage

    Storage Area Network

    Software-Defined Storage

    Hyperconverged Infrastructure

    NAS refers to a storage device that is connected directly to your network. Any user or device with access to your network can access the available storage provided by the NAS. NAS storage is easily scalable and can add data redundancy through RAID technology. NAS uses the file storage format.

    NAS storage may or may not be the first choice in terms of enterprise storage, but it does have a solid market appeal as an on-premises primary backup storage solution.

    A SAN is a dedicated network of pooled storage devices. The dedicated network, separate from the regular network, provides high speed and scalability without concern for the regular network traffic. SANs use block storage format and can be divided into logical units that can be shared between servers or segregated from other servers. SANs can be accessed by multiple servers and systems at the same time. SANs are scalable and offer high availability and redundancy through RAID technology.

    SANs can use a variety of disk types and sizes and are quite common among on-premises storage solutions.

    “Software-defined storage (SDS) is a storage architecture that separates storage software from its hardware. Unlike traditional network-attached storage (NAS) or storage area network (SAN) systems, SDS is generally designed to perform on any industry-standard or x86 system, removing the software’s dependence on proprietary hardware.” (RedHat)

    SDS uses software-based policies and rules to grow and protect storage attached to applications.

    SDS allows you to use server-based storage products to add management, protection, and better usage.

    Hyperconverged storage uses virtualization and software-defined storage to combine the storage, compute, and network resources along with a hypervisor into one appliance.

    Hyperconverged storage can scale out by adding more nodes or appliances, but scaling up, or adding more resources to each appliance, can have limitations. There is flexibility as hyperconverged storage can work with most network and compute manufacturers.

    Cloud storage

    • Cloud storage is online storage offered by a cloud provider. Cloud storage is available almost anywhere and is set up with high availability features such as data duplication, redundancy, backup, and power failure protection.
    • Cloud storage is very scalable and typically is offered as object storage, block storage, or file storage. Cloud storage vendors may have their own naming scheme for object, block, or file storage.
    • Cloud-hosted data is marketed according to the frequency of access and length of time in storage. There are typically three main levels of storage: hot, warm, or cold. Vendors may have their own naming convention for hot, warm, and cold storage. Some may also add more layers such as very hot or very cold.
      • Hot storage is for data that is frequently accessed and modified. It is available on demand and is the most costly of the storage levels.
      • Cold storage is for data that will sit for a long period of time and not need to be accessed. Cold storage is usually only available after several hours or days. Cold storage is very low cost and, in some cases, even free, but retrieval or restoration for the free services can be costly.
      • Warm storage sits in between hot and cold storage. It is for data that is infrequently needed. The cost of warm storage is also in between hot and cold storage costs, and access times are measured in terms of minutes or hours.
      • It is not uncommon for data to start in hot storage and, as it ages, move to warm and eventually cold storage.

    “Enterprise cloud storage offers nearly unlimited scalability. Enterprises can add storage quickly and easily as it is needed, eliminating the risk and cost of over-provisioning.”

    – Spectrum Enterprise

    “Hot data will operate on fresh data. Cold data will operate on less frequent data and [is] used mainly for reporting and planning. Warm data is a balance between the two.”

    – TechBlost

    Enterprise storage features

    The features listed below, while not intended to cover all features offered by all vendors, should be considered and could act as a baseline for discussions with storage providers when evaluating enterprise storage offerings.

    • Scalability
      • What are the options to expand, and how easy or difficult it is to expand capacity in the future?
    • Security
      • Does the solution offer data encryption options as well as ransomware protections?
    • Integration options
      • Can the solution support seamless connectivity with other solutions and applications, such as cloud-based storage or backup software?
    • Storage reduction
      • Does the solution offer space-reduction options such as deduplication or data compression?
    • Replication
      • Does the solution offer replication options such as device to device on premises, device to device when geographically separated, device to cloud, or a combination of these scenarios?
    • Performance
      • “Enterprise storage systems have two main ‘speed’ measurements: throughput and IOPS. Throughput is the data transfer rate to and from storage media, measured in bytes per second; IOPS measures the number of reads and writes – input/output (I/O) operations – per second.” (Computer Weekly)
    • Protocol support
      • Does the solution support object-based, block-based, and file-based storage protocols?
    • Storage Efficiency
      • How efficient is the solution? Can they prove it?
      • Storage efficiencies must be available and baselined.
    • Management platform
      • A management/reporting platform should be a component included in the system.
    • Multi-parity
      • Does the solution offer multi-level block “parity” for RAID 6 protection equivalency, which would allow for the simultaneous failure of two disks?
    • Proactive support
      • Features such as call home, dial in, or remote support must be available on the system.
    • Financial considerations
      • The cost is always a concern, but are there subscription-based or “as-a-service” options?
      • Internally, is it better for this expenditure to be a capital expenditure or an ongoing operating expense?

    What’s new in enterprise storage

    • Data warehouses are not a new concept, but the data storage evolution and growth of data means that data lakes and data lakehouses are growing in popularity.
      • “A data lake is a centralized repository that allows you to store all your structured and unstructured data at any scale. You can store your data as-is, without having to first structure the data” (Amazon Web Services).
      • Analytics with a data lake is possible, but manipulation of the data is hindered due to the nature of the data. A data lakehouse adds data management and analytics to a data lake, similar to the data warehouse functionality added to databases.
    • Options for on-premises hardware support is changing.
      • Pure Storage was the first to shake up the SAN support model with its Evergreen support option. Evergreen//Forever support allows for storage controller upgrades without having to migrate data or replace your disks or chassis (Pure Storage).
      • In response to the Pure Storage Evergreen offering, Dell, HPE, NetApp, and others have come out with similar programs that offer controller upgrades while maintaining the data, disks, and chassis.
    • “As a service” is available as a hybrid solution.
      • Storage as a service (STaaS) originally referred to hosted, fully cloud-based offerings without the need for any on-premises hardware.
      • The latest STaaS offerings provide on-premises or colocated hardware with pay-as-you-go subscription pricing for data consumption. Administration, management, and support are included. The vendor will supply support and manage everything on your behalf.
      • Most of the major storage vendors offer a variation of storage as a service.

    “Because data lakes mostly consist of raw unprocessed data, a data scientist with specialized expertise is typically needed to manipulate and translate the data.”

    – DevIQ

    “A Lakehouse is also a type of centralized data repository, integrated from heterogeneous sources. As can be expected from its name, It shares features with both datawarehouses and data lakes.”

    – Cesare

    “Storage as a service (STaaS) eliminates Capex, simplifies management and offers extensive flexibility.”

    – TechTarget

    Major vendors

    The current vendor landscape for enterprise storage solutions represents a range of industry veterans and the brands they’ve aggregated along the way, as well as some relative newcomers who have come to the forefront within the past ten years.

    Vendors like Dell EMC and HPE are longstanding veterans of storage appliances with established offerings and a back catalogue of acquisitions fueling their growth. Others such as Pure Storage offer creative solutions like all-flash arrays, which are becoming more and more appealing as flash storage becomes more commoditized.

    Cloud-based vendors have become popular options in recent years. Cloud storage provides many options and has attracted many other vendors to provide a cloud option in addition to their on-premises solutions. Some software and hardware vendors also partner with cloud vendors to offer a complete solution that includes storage.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Explore your current vendor’s solutions as a starting point, then use that understanding as a reference point to dive into other players in the market

    Key Players

    • Amazon
    • Cisco
    • Dell EMC
    • Google
    • Hewlett Packard Enterprise
    • Hitachi Vantara
    • IBM
    • Microsoft
    • NetApp
    • Nutanix
    • Pure Storage

    Enterprise Storage Use Cases

    Block, object, or file storage? NAS, SAN, SDS, or HCI? Cloud or on prem? Hot, warm, or cold?
    Which one do you choose?
    The following use cases based on actual Info-Tech analyst calls may help you decide.

    1. Offsite backup solution
    2. Infrastructure consolidation
    3. DR/BCP datacenter duplication
    4. Expansion of existing storage
    5. Complete backup solution
    6. Existing storage solution going out of support soon
    7. Video storage
    8. Classify and offload storage

    Offsite backup solution

    “Offsite” may make you think of geographical separation or even cloud-based storage, but what is the best option and why?

    Use Case: How a manufacturing company dealt with retired applications

    • A leading manufacturing company had to preserve older applications no longer in use.
    • The company had completed several acquisitions and ended up with multiple legacy applications that had been merged or migrated into replacement solutions. These legacy applications were very important to the original companies, and although the data they held had been migrated to a replacement solution, executives felt they should hold on to these applications for a period of time, just in case.
    • A modern archiving solution was considered, but a research advisor from Info-Tech Research joined a call with the manufacturing company and helped the client realize that the solution was a modified backup. The application data had already been preserved through the migration, so data could be accessed in the production environment.
    • The data could be exported from the legacy application into a nonsequential database, compressed, and stored in cloud-based cold storage for less than $5 per terabyte per month. The manufacturing company staff realized that they could apply this same approach to several of their legacy applications and save tens of thousands of dollars in the process.
    • Cold storage is inexpensive until you start retrieving that data frequently. The manufacturing company knew they did not have a requirement to retrieve the application and data for a very long time, so cloud-based cold storage was ideal.

    “Data retrieval from cold storage is harder and slower than it is from hot storage. … Because of the longer retrieval time, online cold storage plans are often much cheaper. … The downside is that you’d incur additional costs when retrieving the data.”

    – Ben Stockton, Cloudwards

    Infrastructure consolidation

    Hyperconverged infrastructure combines storage, virtual infrastructure, and associated management into one piece of equipment.

    Use Case: How one company dealt with equipment and storage needs

    • One Info-Tech client had recently started in the role of IT director and realized he had inherited aging infrastructure along with a serious data challenge. The storage appliances were old and out of support. The appliances were performing inadequately, and the client was in need of more data due to ongoing growth, but he also realized that the virtual environment was running on very old servers that were no longer supported. The IT director reached out to Info-Tech to find solutions to the virtualization challenge, but the storage problem also came up throughout the course of the conversation with an analyst.
    • The analyst quickly realized that the IT director was an ideal candidate for a hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) storage solution, which would also provide the necessary virtual environment.
    • The analyst explained the benefits of having a single appliance that would provide virtualization needs as well as storage needs. The built-in management features would ease the burden of administration, and the software-defined nature of the HCI would allow for the migration of data as well as future expansion options.
    • Hyperconverged infrastructure is offered by many vendors under a variety of names. Most are similar but some may have a better interface or other features. The expansion process is simple, and HCI is a good fit for many organizations looking to consolidate virtual infrastructure and storage.

    “HCI environments use a hypervisor, usually running on a server that uses direct-attached storage (DAS), to create a data center pool of systems and resources.”

    – Samuel Greengard, Datamation

    Datacenter duplication

    SAN providers offer a varied range of options for their products, and those options are constantly evolving.

    Use Case: Independent school district provides better data access using SAN technology

    • An independent school district was expanding by adding a second data center in a new school. This new data center would be approximately 20 miles away from the original data center used by the district. The intent was not to replace the original data center but to use both centers to store data and provide services concurrently. The district’s ideal scenario would be that users would not know or care which data center they were reaching, and there would be no difference in the service received from each data center. The school district reached out to Info-Tech when planning discussions reached the topic of data duplication and replication software.
    • An Info-Tech analyst joined a call with the school district and guided the conversation toward the existing environment to understand what options might be available. The analyst quickly discovered that all the district’s servers were virtual, and all associated data was stored on a single SAN.
    • The analyst informed the school district staff about SAN options, including SAN-to-SAN replication. If the school district had a sufficient link between the two data centers, SAN-to-SAN replication would work for them and provide the two identical copies of data at two locations.
    • The analyst continued to offer explanations of other features that some vendors offer with their SANs, such as the ability to turn on or off deduplication and compression, as well as disk options such as flash or NVMe.
    • The school district was moving to the request for proposal (RFP) stage but hoped to have SAN-to-SAN replication implemented before the next academic year started.

    “SAN-to-SAN replication is a low-cost, highly efficient way to manage mounting quantities of stored data.”

    – Secure Infrastructure & Services

    Expansion of existing storage

    That old storage area network may still have some useful life left in it.

    Use Case: Municipality solves data storage aging and growth challenge

    • A municipality in the United States reached out to Info-Tech for guidance on its storage challenge. The municipality had accumulated multiple SANs from different vendors over the years. These SANs were running out of storage, and more data storage was needed. The municipality’s data was growing at a rapid pace, thanks to municipal growth and expansion of services. The IT team was also concerned with modernizing their storage and not hindering their long-term growth by making the wrong purchase decision for their current storage needs.
    • An analyst from Info-Tech discussed several options with the municipality but in the end advised that software-defined storage may be the best solution.
    • Software-defined storage (SDS) would allow the municipality to gain better visibility into existing storage while making more efficient use of existing and new storage. SDS could take over the management of the existing storage from multiple vendors and add additional storage as required. SDS would also be able to integrate cloud-based storage if that was the direction taken by the municipality in the future.
    • The municipality moved forward with an SDS solution and added some additional storage capacity. They used some of their existing SANs but retired the more troublesome ones. The SDS system managed all the storage instances and data management. The administration of the storage environment was easier for the storage admins, and long-term savings were achieved through better storage management.

    “Often enterprises have added storage on an ad hoc basis as they needed it for various applications. That can result in a mishmash of heterogenous storage hardware from a wide variety of vendors. SDS offers the ability to unify management of these different storage devices, allowing IT to be more efficient.”

    – Cynthia Harvey, Enterprise Storage Forum (“What Is Software Defined Storage?”, 2018)

    Complete backup solution

    Many backup software solutions can provide backups to multiple locations, making two-location backups simple.

    Use Case: How an oil refinery modernized its backup solution

    • A large oil refinery needed a better solution for the storage of backups. The refinery was replacing its backup software solution but also wanted to improve the backup storage situation and move away from tape-based storage. All other infrastructure was reasonably modern and not in need of replacement at this time.
    • A research analyst from Info-Tech helped the client realize that the solution was a modified backup. The general guidance for backups is have a least one copy offsite, so the cloud was the obvious focal point. The analyst also explained that it would be beneficial to have a recent copy of the backup available on site for common restoration requests in addition to having the offsite copy for disaster recovery (DR) purposes.
    • The refinery staff conducted a data analysis to determine how much data was being backed up on a daily basis. The solution proposed by the analyst included network-attached storage (NAS) with adequate storage to hold 30 days' worth of on-premises data. The backup software would also simultaneously copy each backup to a cloud-based storage repository. The backup software was smart enough to only back up and transfer data that had changed since the previous backup, so transfer time and capacity was not a factor.
    • The NAS would allow for the restoration of any local, on-premises data while the cloud storage would provide a safe location offsite for backup data. It could also serve as the backup location for other cloud-based services that required a backup.

    “Data protection demands that enterprises have multiple methods of keeping data safe and replicating it in case of disaster or loss.”

    – Drew Robb, Enterprise Storage Forum, 2021

    Storage going out of support

    SAN solutions have come a long way with improvements in how data is stored and what is used to store the data.

    Use Case: How one organization replaced its old storage with a similar solution

    • A government organization was looking for a solution for its aging storage area network appliances. The SANs were old and would be no longer supported by the manufacturer within four months. The SANs had slower spinning disks and their individual capacity was at its limit through the addition of extra shelves and disks over the years.
    • The organization reached out to Info-Tech for guidance. An analyst arranged a call with them, and they discussed the storage situation in detail, including desired benefits from a storage solution and growth requirements. They also discussed cloud storage, but the government organization was not in a position to move its data to the cloud for a variety of reasons.
    • Although the individual SANs were at their storage capacity limit, the total amount of data was well within the limits of many modern on-premises storage solutions. SSD and flash or NVMe storage can store large amounts of data in small footprints and form factors.
    • The analyst reviewed several vendors with the client and discussed some advantages and disadvantages of each. They explored the features offered as well as scalability options.
    • SANs have been around for a long time but the features and capabilities that come with them has evolved. They are still a very viable solution for many organizations in a variety of scenarios.

    “A rapidly growing portion of SAN deployments leverages all-flash storage to gain its high performance, consistent low latency, and lower total cost when compared to spinning disk.”

    – NetApp

    Video storage

    Cloud storage would not be sufficient if you were using a dial up connection, just as on-premises storage solutions would not suffice if they were using floppy disks.

    Use Case: Body cams and public cameras in municipalities are driving storage growth

    • Municipal law enforcement agencies are wearing body cameras more frequently, for their own protection as well as for the protection of the public. Camera footage can be useful in legal situations as well. Municipalities are also installing more and more public cameras for the purposes of public safety. The recorded video footage from these cameras can result in large data files, which in turn drive data storage requirements.
    • Info-Tech analysts are joining calls about video data storage with increasing frequency. The concerns are repetitive, and the guidance is similar on most of these calls.
    • The “object” storage format is ideal for video and media data. Most cloud-based storage solutions use object storage, but it is also available with on-premises solutions such as NAS or SAN. The challenges clients are expressing are typically related to inadequate bandwidth for cloud-based storage or other storage formats instead of “object” storage. Cloud-based storage can also grow beyond the budgeted numbers, causing an increase in the monthly cloud cost. Older, slower on-premises hardware sometimes reveals itself as the latency culprit.
    • Object storage is well suited for the unstructured data that is video footage. It uses metadata to tag the video file for future retrieval and is easily expandable, which also makes it cost effective.
    • Video data stored in a cloud-based repository will work fine as long as the bandwidth is adequate. On-premises storage of video data is also quite adequate on the right storage format, with fast disks and a reasonably up-to-date network infrastructure.

    “The captured video is stored for days, weeks, months and sometimes years and consumes a lot of space. Data storage plays a new and important role in these systems. Object storage is ideal to store the video data.”

    – Object-Storage.Info

    Classify and offload primary storage

    Some software products have storage options available as a result of agreements with other storage vendors. Several backup and archive software products fall into this category.

    Use Case: Enterprise storage can help reduce data sprawl

    • A large engineering firm was trying to manage its data sprawl. The team sampled a small percentage of their data and quickly realized that when they applied their findings on the 1% of data to their entire data estate, the sheer volume of personal files, older files, and unclassified data was going to be a challenge.
    • They found a solution in archiving software. The archiving software would tag data based on several factors. The software would move older files away from primary storage to an alternate storage platform but still leave a stub of the moved file in place and maintain limited access to those files. This would reduce primary storage requirements and allow the firm to eliminate multiple file servers
    • The engineering firm reached out to Info-Tech and participated in an analyst call. During that call, they laid out their plans, and the analyst made them aware of cloud storage. The positive and negative aspects of cloud storage were discussed, and the firm fully understood that the colder the storage tier, the slower the recovery. The firm's stance was if the files had not been accessed in the past six months, waiting a day or two for retrieval would not be a concern, and the firm was content with cold storage in the cloud.
    • The firm had not purchased the archiving software at the time of the analyst call, and the analyst also explained to them that the archiving software may have an existing agreement with a cloud provider for storage options, which could be more cost effective than purchasing cloud storage separately.
    • Cold cloud-based storage was the preferred solution for this firm, but this use case also highlights the option that some software products carry regarding storage. Several backup and archive products have a cloud storage option that should be investigated, as they may be cost-effective options.

    “Cold storage is perfect for archiving your data. Online backup providers offer low-cost, off-site data backups at the expense of fast speeds and easy access, even though data retrieval often comes at an added cost. If you need to keep your data long-term, but don’t need to access it often, this is the kind of storage you need.”

    – Ben Stockton, Cloudwards

    Understand your data requirements

    Activity

    The first step in solving your enterprise storage challenge is identifying your data sources or drivers, data volume size, and growth rates. This information will give you insight into what data sources could be stored on premises or in the cloud, how much storage you will require for the coming five to ten years, and what to consider when exploring enterprise storage solutions.

    • Info-Tech’s Modernize Enterprise Storage Workbook can be a valuable asset for determining your current storage drivers and future storage needs, structuring a plan for future storage purchases, and determining timelines and total cost of ownership.
    • An example of the Storage Capacity Calculator tab from that workbook is displayed on the right. Using the Storage Capacity Requirements Calculator requires minimal steps.
    1. Enter the current date and planning timeline (horizon) in months
    2. Identify the top sources of data within the business – the current data drivers. Areas of focus could include business applications, file shares, backup, and archives.
    3. For each of these data drivers, include your best estimate of:
    • Current data volume
    • Growth rate
  • Identify the top future data drivers, such as new applications or initiatives that will result from current business plans and priorities, and record the following details:
    • Initial data volumes
    • Projected growth rates
    • Planned implementation date
  • The spreadsheet will automatically calculate the data volume at the planning horizon based on the growth rate.
  • Download the Modernize Enterprise Storage Workbook and take the first step toward understanding your data requirements.

    The image contains a screenshot of the Modernize Enterprise Storage Workbook.

    Download the Modernize Enterprise Storage Workbook

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Modernize Enterprise Storage

    Current and emerging storage technologies are disrupting the status quo – prepare your infrastructure for the exponential rise in data and its storage requirements.

    Modernize Enterprise Storage Workbook

    This workbook will complement the discussions and activities found in the Modernize Enterprise Storage blueprint. Use this workbook in conjunction with the blueprint to develop a strategy for storage modernization.

    Bibliography

    Bakkianathan, Raghunathan. “What is the difference between Hot Warm and Cold data storage?” TechBlost, n.d.. Accessed 14 July 2022.
    Cesare. “Data warehouse vs Data lake vs Lakehouse… and DeltaLake?“ Medium, 14 June 2021. Accessed 26 July 2022.
    Davison, Shawn and Ryan Sappenfield. “Data Lake Vs Lakehouse Vs Data Mesh: The Evolution of Data Transformation.” DevIQ, May 2022. Accessed 23 July 2022.
    Desjardins, Jeff. “Infographic: How Much Data is Generated Each Day?” Visual Capitalist, 15 April 2019. Accessed 26 July 2022.
    Greengard, Samuel. “Top 10 Hyperconverged Infrastructure (HCI) Solutions.” Datamation, 22 December 2020. Accessed 23 July 2022.
    Harvey, Cynthia. “Flash vs. SSD Storage: Is there a Difference?” Enterprise Storage Forum, 10 July 2018. Accessed 23 July 2022.
    Harvey, Cynthia. “What Is Software Defined Storage? Features & Benefits.” Enterprise Storage Forum, 22 February 2018. Accessed 23 July 2022.
    Hecht, Gil. “4 Predictions for storage and backup security in 2022.” Continuity Software, 09 January 2022. Accessed 22 July 2022.
    Jacobi, Jonl. “NVMe SSDs: Everything you need to know about this insanely fast storage.” PCWorld, 10 March 2019. Accessed 22 July 2022
    Pritchard, Stephen. “Briefing: Cloud storage performance metrics.” Computer Weekly, 16 July 2021. Accessed 23 July 2022
    Robb, Drew. “Best Enterprise Backup Software & Solutions 2022.” Enterprise Storage Forum, 09 April 2021. Accessed 23 July 2022.
    Sheldon, Robert. “On-premises STaaS shifts storage buying to Opex model.” TechTarget, 10 August 2020. Accessed 22 July 2022.
    “Simplify Your Storage Ownership, Forever.” PureStorage. Accessed 20 July 2022.
    Stockton, Ben. “Hot Storage vs Cold Storage in 2022: Instant Access vs Long-Term Archives.” Cloudwards, 29 September 2021. Accessed 22 July 2022.
    “The Cost Savings of SAN-to-SAN Replication.” Secure Infrastructure and Services, 31 March 2016. Accessed 16 July 2022.
    “Video Surveillance.” Object-Storage.Info, 18 December 2019. Accessed 25 July 2022.
    “What is a Data Lake?” Amazon Web Services, n.d. Accessed 17 July 2022.
    “What is enterprise cloud storage?” Spectrum Enterprise, n.d. Accessed 28 July 2022.
    “What is SAN (Storage Area Network).” NetApp, n.d. Accessed 25 July 2022.
    “What is software-defined storage?” RedHat, 08 March 2018. Accessed 16 July 2022.

    Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}582|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $10,000 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 5 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Strategy & Operating Model
    • Parent Category Link: /strategy-and-operating-model
    • EA governance is perceived as an unnecessary layer of bureaucracy because business benefits are poorly communicated.
    • The organization doesn’t have a formalized EA practice.
    • Where an EA practice exists, employees are unsure of EA’s roles and responsibilities.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Enterprise architecture is not a technical function – it should be business-value driven and forward looking, positioning organizational assets in favor of long-term strategy rather than short-term tactics.

    Impact and Result

    • Value-focused. Focus EA governance on helping the organization achieve business benefits. Promote EA’s contribution in realizing business value.
    • Right-sized. Re-use existing process checkpoints rather than creating new ones. Clearly define EA governance inclusion criteria for projects.
    • Defined and measured process. Define metrics to measure EA’s performance and integrate EA governance with other governance processes such as project governance. Also clearly define the EA governing bodies’ composition, domain, inputs, and outputs.
    • Strike the right balance. Adopt architecture principles that strikes the right balance between business and technology.

    Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our Executive Brief to find out how implementing a successful enterprise architecture governance framework can benefit your organization.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Current State of EA Governance

    Identify the organization’s standing in terms of the enterprise architecture practice, and know the gaps and what the EA practice needs to fulfill to create a good governance framework.

    • Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework – Phase 1: Current State of EA Governance
    • EA Capability – Risk and Complexity Assessment Tool
    • EA Governance Assessment Tool

    2. EA Fundamentals

    Understand the EA fundamentals and then refresh them to better align the EA practice with the organization and create business benefit.

    • Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework – Phase 2: EA Fundamentals
    • EA Vision and Mission Template
    • EA Goals and Measures Template
    • EA Principles Template

    3. Engagement Model

    Analyze the IT operating model and identify EA’s role at each stage; refine it to promote effective EA engagement upfront in the early stages of the IT operating model.

    • Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework – Phase 3: Engagement Model
    • EA Engagement Model Template

    4. EA Governing Bodies

    Set up EA governing bodies to provide guidance and foster a collaborative environment by identifying the correct number of EA governing bodies, defining the game plan to initialize the governing bodies, and creating an architecture review process.

    • Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework – Phase 4: EA Governing Bodies
    • Architecture Board Charter Template
    • Architecture Review Process Template

    5. EA Policy

    Create an EA policy to provide a set of guidelines designed to direct and constrain the architecture actions of the organization in the pursuit of its goals in order to improve architecture compliance and drive business value.

    • Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework – Phase 5: EA Policy
    • EA Policy Template
    • EA Assessment Checklist Template
    • EA Compliance Waiver Process Template
    • EA Compliance Waiver Form Template

    6. Architectural Standards

    Define architecture standards to facilitate information exchange, improve collaboration, and provide stability. Develop a process to update the architectural standards to ensure relevancy and promote process transparency.

    • Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework – Phase 6: Architectural Standards
    • Architecture Standards Update Process Template

    7. Communication Plan

    Craft a plan to engage the relevant stakeholders, ascertain the benefits of the initiative, and identify the various communication methods in order to maximize the chances of success.

    • Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework – Phase 7: Communication Plan
    • EA Governance Communication Plan Template
    • EA Governance Framework Template
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Current State of EA governance (Pre-workshop)

    The Purpose

    Conduct stakeholder interviews to understand current state of EA practice and prioritize gaps for EA governance based on organizational complexity.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Prioritized list of actions to arrive at the target state based on the complexity of the organization

    Activities

    1.1 Determine organizational complexity.

    1.2 Conduct an assessment of the EA governance components.

    1.3 Identify and prioritize gaps.

    1.4 Conduct senior management interviews.

    Outputs

    Organizational complexity score

    EA governance current state and prioritized list of EA governance component gaps

    Stakeholder perception of the EA practice

    2 EA Fundamentals and Engagement Model

    The Purpose

    Refine EA fundamentals to align the EA practice with the organization and identify EA touchpoints to provide guidance for projects.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Alignment of EA goals and objectives with the goals and objectives of the organization

    Early involvement of EA in the IT operating model

    Activities

    2.1 Review the output of the organizational complexity and EA assessment tools.

    2.2 Craft the EA vision and mission.

    2.3 Develop the EA principles.

    2.4 Identify the EA goals.

    2.5 Identify EA engagement touchpoints within the IT operating model.

    Outputs

    EA vision and mission statement

    EA principles

    EA goals and measures

    Identified EA engagement touchpoints and EA level of involvement

    3 EA Governing Bodies

    The Purpose

    Set up EA governing bodies to provide guidance and foster a collaborative environment by identifying the correct number of EA governing bodies, defining the game plan to initialize the governing bodies and creating an architecture review process.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Business benefits are maximized and solution design is within the options set forth by the architectural reference models while no additional layers of bureaucracy are introduced

    Activities

    3.1 Identify the number of governing bodies.

    3.2 Define the game plan to initialize the governing bodies.

    3.3 Define the architecture review process.

    Outputs

    Architecture board structure and coverage

    Identified architecture review template

    4 EA Policy

    The Purpose

    Create an EA policy to provide a set of guidelines designed to direct and constrain the architecture actions of the organization in the pursuit of its goals in order to improve architecture compliance and drive business value.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Improved architecture compliance, which ties investments to business value and provides guidance to architecture practitioners

    Activities

    4.1 Define the scope.

    4.2 Identify the target audience.

    4.3 Determine the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

    4.4 Craft an assessment checklist.

    Outputs

    Defined scope

    Inclusion and exclusion criteria for project review

    Architecture assessment checklist

    5 Architectural Standards and Communication Plan

    The Purpose

    Define architecture standards to facilitate information exchange, improve collaboration, and provide stability.

    Craft a communication plan to implement the new EA governance framework in order to maximize the chances of success.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Consistent development of architecture, increased information exchange between stakeholders

    Improved process transparency

    Improved stakeholder engagement

    Activities

    5.1 Identify and standardize EA work products.

    5.2 Classifying the architectural standards.

    5.3 Identifying the custodian of standards.

    5.4 Update the standards.

    5.5 List the changes identified in the EA governance initiative

    5.6 Create a communication plan.

    Outputs

    Identified set of EA work products to standardize

    Architecture information taxonomy

    Identified set of custodian of standards

    Standard update process

    List of EA governance initiatives

    Communication plan for EA governance initiatives

    Further reading

    Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework

    Focus on process standardization, repeatability, and sustainability.

    ANALYST PERSPECTIVE

    "Enterprise architecture is not a technology concept, rather it is the foundation on which businesses orient themselves to create and capture value in the marketplace. Designing architecture is not a simple task and creating organizations for the future requires forward thinking and rigorous planning.

    Architecture processes that are supposed to help facilitate discussions and drive option analysis are often seen as an unnecessary overhead. The negative perception is due to enterprise architecture groups being overly prescriptive rather than providing a set of options that guide and constrain solutions at the same time.

    EA groups should do away with the direct and control mindset and change to a collaborate and mentor mindset. As part of the architecture governance, EA teams should provide an option set that constrains design choices, and also be open to changes to standards or best practices. "

    Gopi Bheemavarapu, Sr. Manager, CIO Advisory Info-Tech Research Group

    Our understanding of the problem

    This Research Is Designed For:

    • CIO
    • IT Leaders
    • Business Leaders
    • Head of Enterprise Architecture
    • Enterprise Architects
    • Domain Architects
    • Solution Architects

    This Research Will Help You:

    • Understand the importance of enterprise architecture (EA) governance and how to apply it to guide architectural decisions.
    • Enhance your understanding of the organization’s current EA governance and identify areas for improvement.
    • Optimize your EA engagement model to maximize value creation.
    • Learn how to set up the optimal number of governance bodies in order to avoid bureaucratizing the organization.

    This Research Will Also Assist:

    • Business Relationship Managers
    • Business Analysts
    • IT Managers
    • Project Managers
    • IT Analysts
    • Quality Assurance Leads
    • Software Developers

    This Research Will Help Them:

    • Give an overview of enterprise architecture governance
    • Clarity on the role of enterprise architecture team

    Executive summary

    Situation

    • Deployed solutions do not meet business objectives resulting in expensive and extensive rework.
    • Each department acts independently without any regular EA touchpoints.
    • Organizations practice project-level architecture as opposed to enterprise architecture.

    Complication

    • EA governance is perceived as an unnecessary layer of bureaucracy because business benefits are poorly communicated.
    • The organization doesn’t have a formalized EA practice.
    • Where an EA practice exists, employees are unsure of EA’s roles and responsibilities.

    Resolution

    • Value-focused. Focus EA governance on helping the organization achieve business benefits. Promote EA’s contribution in realizing business value.
    • Right-sized. Re-use existing process checkpoints, rather than creating new ones. Clearly define EA governance inclusion criteria for projects.
    • Defined and measured process. Define metrics to measure EA’s performance and integrate EA governance with other governance processes such as project governance. Also clearly define the EA governing bodies’ composition, domain, inputs, and outputs.
    • Strike the right balance. Adopt architecture principles that strikes the right balance between business and technology imperatives.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Enterprise architecture is critical to ensuring that an organization has the solid IT foundation it needs to efficiently enable the achievement of its current and future strategic goals rather than focusing on short-term tactical gains.

    What is enterprise architecture governance?

    An architecture governance process is the set of activities an organization executes to ensure that decisions are made and accountability is enforced during the execution of its architecture strategy. (Hopkins, “The Essential EA Toolkit.”)

    EA governance includes the following:

    • Implement a system of controls over the creation and monitoring of all architectural components.
    • Ensure effective introduction, implementation, and evolution of architectures within the organization.
    • Implement a system to ensure compliance with internal and external standards and regulatory obligations.
    • Develop practices that ensure accountability to a clearly identified stakeholder community, both inside and outside the organization.

    (TOGAF)

    IT governance sets direction through prioritization and decision making, and monitors overall IT performance.

    The image shows a circle set within a larger circle. The inner circle is connected to the bottom of the larger circle. The inner circle is labelled EA Governance and the larger circle is labelled IT Governance.

    EA governance ensures that optimal architectural design choices are being made that focus on long-term value creation.

    Harness the benefits of an optimized EA governance

    Core benefits of EA governance are seen through:

    Value creation

    Effective EA governance ensures alignment between organizational investments and corporate strategic goals and objectives.

    Cost reduction

    Architecture standards provide guidance to identify opportunities for reuse and eliminate redundancies in an organization.

    Risk optimization

    Architecture review processes and assessment checklists ensure that solutions are within the acceptable risk levels of the organization.

    EA governance is difficult to structure appropriately, but having an effective structure will allow you to:

    • Achieve business strategy through faster time-to-market innovations and capabilities.
    • Reduced transaction costs with more consistent business processes and information across business units.
    • Lower IT costs due to better traceability, faster design, and lower risk.
    • Link IT investments to organizational strategies and objectives
    • Integrate and institutionalizes IT best practices.
    • Enable the organization to take full advantage of its information, infrastructure, and hardware and software assets.
    • Support regulatory as well as best practice requirements such as auditability, security, responsibility, and accountability.

    Organizations that have implemented EA governance realize greater benefits from their EA programs

    Modern day CIOs of high-performing organizations use EA as a strategic planning discipline to improve business-IT alignment, enable innovation, and link business and IT strategies to execution.

    Recent Info-Tech research found that organizations that establish EA governance realize greater benefits from their EA initiatives.

    The image shows a bar graph, with Impact from EA on the Y-axis, and different initiatives listed on the X-axis. Each initiative has two bars connected to it, with a blue bar representing answers of No and the grey bar representing answers of Yes.

    (Info-Tech Research Group, N=89)

    Measure EA governance implementation effectiveness

    Define key operational measures for internal use by IT and EA practitioners. Also, define business value measures that communicate and demonstrate the value of EA as an “enabler” of business outcomes to senior executives.

    EA performance measures (lead, operational) EA value measures (lag)
    Application of EA management process EA’s contribution to IT performance EA’s contribution to business value

    Enterprise Architecture Management

    • Number of months since the last review of target state EA blueprints.

    IT Investment Portfolio Management

    • Percentage of projects that were identified and proposed by EA.

    Solution Development

    • Number of projects that passed EA reviews.
    • Number of building blocks reused.

    Operations Management

    • Reduction in the number of applications with overlapping functionality.

    Business Value

    • Lower non-discretionary IT spend.
    • Decreased time to production.
    • Higher satisfaction of IT-enabled services.

    An insurance provider adopts a value-focused, right-sized EA governance program

    CASE STUDY

    Industry Insurance

    Source Info-Tech

    Situation

    The insurance sector has been undergoing major changes, and as a reaction, businesses within the sector have been embracing technology to provide innovative solutions.

    The head of EA in a major insurance provider (henceforth to be referred to as “INSPRO01”) was given the mandate to ensure that solutions are architected right the first time to maximize reuse and reduce technology debt. The EA group was at a critical point – to demonstrate business value or become irrelevant.

    Complication

    The project management office had been accountable for solution architecture and had placed emphasis on short-term project cost savings at the expense of long term durability.

    There was a lack of awareness of the Enterprise Architecture group within INSPRO01, and people misunderstood the roles and responsibilities of the EA team.

    Result

    Info-Tech helped define the responsibilities of the EA team and clarify the differences between the role of a Solution Architect vs. Enterprise Architect.

    The EA team was able to make the case for change in the project management practices to ensure architectures are reviewed and approved prior to implementation.

    As a result, INSPRO01 saw substantial increases in reuse opportunities and thereby derived more value from its technology investments.

    Success factors for EA governance

    The success of any EA governance initiative revolves around adopting best practices, setting up repeatable processes, and establishing appropriate controls.

    1. Develop best practices for managing architecture policies, procedures, roles, skills, and organizational structures.
    2. Establish organizational responsibilities and structures to support the architecture governance processes.
    3. Management of criteria for the control of the architecture governance processes, dispensations, compliance assessments, and SLAs.

    Info-Tech’s approach to EA governance

    Our best-practice approach is grounded in TOGAF and enhanced by the insights and guidance from our analysts, industry experts, and our clients.

    Value-focused. Focus EA governance on helping the organization achieve business benefits. Promote EA’s contribution in realizing business value.

    Right-sized. Insert EA governance into existing process checkpoints rather than creating new ones. Clearly define EA governance inclusion criteria for projects.

    Measured. Define metrics to measure EA’s performance, and integrate EA governance with other governance processes such as project governance. Also clearly define the EA governing bodies’ composition, domain, inputs, and outputs.

    Balanced. Adopt architecture principles that strikes the right balance between business and technology.

    Info-Tech’s EA governance framework

    Info-Tech’s architectural governance framework provides a value-focused, right-sized approach with a strong emphasis on process standardization, repeatability, and sustainability.

    1. Current state of EA governance
    2. EA fundamentals
    3. Engagement model
    4. EA governing bodies
    5. EA policy
    6. Architectural standards
    7. Communication Plan

    Use Info-Tech’s templates to complete this project

    1. Current state of EA governance
      • EA Capability - Risk and Complexity Assessment Tool
      • EA Governance Assessment Tool
    2. EA fundamentals
      • EA Vision and Mission Template
      • EA Goals and Measures Template
      • EA Principles Template
    3. Engagement model
      • EA Engagement Model Template
    4. EA governing bodies
      • Architecture Board Charter Template
      • Architecture Review Process Template
    5. EA policy
      • EA Policy Template
      • Architecture Assessment Checklist Template
      • Compliance Waiver Process Template
      • Compliance Waiver Form Template
    6. Architectural standards
      • Architecture Standards Update Process Template
    7. Communication Plan
      • EA Governance Communication Plan Template
      • EA Governance Framework Template

    As you move through the project, capture your progress with a summary in the EA Governance Framework Template.

    Download the EA Governance Framework Template document for use throughout this project.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    “Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

    Workshop

    “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

    Consulting

    “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    EA governance framework – phase-by-phase outline (1/2)

    Current state of EA governance EA Fundamentals Engagement Model EA Governing Bodies
    Best-Practice Toolkit

    1.1 Determine organizational complexity

    1.2 Conduct an assessment of the EA governance components

    1.3 Identify and prioritize gaps

    2.1 Craft the EA vision and mission

    2.2 Develop the EA principles

    2.3 Identify the EA goals

    3.1 Build the case for EA engagement

    3.2 Identify engagement touchpoints within the IT operating model

    4.1 Identify the number of governing bodies

    4.2 Define the game plan to initialize the governing bodies

    4.3 Define the architecture review process

    Guided Implementations
    • Determine organizational complexity
    • Assess current state of EA governance
    • Develop the EA fundamentals
    • Review the EA fundamentals
    • Review the current IT operating model
    • Determine the target engagement model
    • Identify architecture boards and develop charters
    • Develop an architecture review process

    Phase 1 Results:

    • EA Capability - risk and complexity assessment
    • EA governance assessment

    Phase 2 Results:

    • EA vision and mission
    • EA goals and measures
    • EA principles

    Phase 3 Results:

    • EA engagement model

    Phase 4 Results:

    • Architecture board charter
    • Architecture review process

    EA governance framework – phase-by-phase outline (2/2)

    EA Policy Architectural Standards Communication Plan
    Best-Practice Toolkit

    5.1 Define the scope of EA policy

    5.2 Identify the target audience

    5.3 Determine the inclusion and exclusion criteria

    5.4 Craft an assessment checklist

    6.1 Identify and standardize EA work products

    6.2 Classify the architectural standards

    6.3 Identify the custodian of standards

    6.4 Update the standards

    7.1 List the changes identified in the EA governance initiative

    7.2 Identify stakeholders

    7.3 Create a communication plan

    Guided Implementations
    • EA policy, assessment checklists, and decision types
    • Compliance waivers
    • Understand architectural standards
    • EA repository and updating the standards
    • Create a communication plan
    • Review the communication plan

    Phase 5 Results:

    • EA policy
    • Architecture assessment checklist
    • Compliance waiver process
    • Compliance waiver form

    Phase 6 Results:

    • Architecture standards update process

    Phase 7 Results:

    • Communication plan
    • EA governance framework

    Workshop overview

    Contact your account representative or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Pre-workshopWorkshop Day 1Workshop Day 2Workshop Day 3Workshop Day 4
    ActivitiesCurrent state of EA governance EA fundamentals and engagement model EA governing bodies EA policy Architectural standards and

    communication plan

    1.1 Determine organizational complexity

    1.2 Conduct an assessment of the EA governance components

    1.3 Identify and prioritize gaps

    1.4 Senior management interviews

    1. Review the output of the organizational complexity and EA assessment tools
    2. Craft the EA vision and mission
    3. Develop the EA principles.
    4. Identify the EA goals
    5. Identify EA engagement touchpoints within the IT operating model
    1. Identify the number of governing bodies
    2. Define the game plan to initialize the governing bodies
    3. Define the architecture review process
    1. Define the scope
    2. Identify the target audience
    3. Determine the inclusion and exclusion criteria
    4. Craft an assessment checklist
    1. Identify and standardize EA work products
    2. Classifying the architectural standards
    3. Identifying the custodian of standards
    4. Updating the standards
    5. List the changes identified in the EA governance initiative
    6. Identify stakeholders
    7. Create a communication plan
    Deliverables
    1. EA Capability - risk and complexity assessment tool
    2. EA governance assessment tool
    1. EA vision and mission template
    2. EA goals and measures template
    3. EA principles template
    4. EA engagement model template
    1. Architecture board charter template
    2. Architecture review process template
    1. EA policy template
    2. Architecture assessment checklist template
    3. Compliance waiver process template
    4. Compliance waiver form template
    1. Architecture standards update process template
    2. Communication plan template

    Phase 1

    Current State of EA Governance

    Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework

    Current State of EA Governance

    1. Current State of EA Governance
    2. EA Fundamentals
    3. Engagement Model
    4. EA Governing Bodies
    5. EA Policy
    6. Architectural Standards
    7. Communication Plan

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Determine organizational complexity
    • Conduct an assessment of the EA governance components
    • Identify and prioritize gaps

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Leaders
    • Business Leaders
    • Head of Enterprise Architecture
    • Enterprise Architects
    • Domain Architects
    • Solution Architects

    Outcomes of this step

    • Prioritized list of gaps

    Info-Tech Insight

    Correlation is not causation – an apparent problem might be a symptom rather than a cause. Assess the organization’s current EA governance to discover the root cause and go beyond the symptoms.

    Phase 1 guided implementation outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 1: Current State of EA Governance

    Proposed Time to Completion: 2 weeks

    Step 1.1: Determine organizational complexity

    Start with an analyst kick-off call:

    • Discuss how to use Info-Tech’s EA Capability – Risk and Complexity Assessment Tool.
    • Discuss how to complete the inputs on the EA Governance Assessment Tool.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Conduct an assessment of your organization to determine its complexity.
    • Assess the state of EA governance within your organization.

    With these tools & templates:

    • EA Capability – Risk and Complexity Assessment Tool
    • EA Governance Assessment Tool

    Step 1.2: Assess current state of EA governance

    Start with an analyst kick-off call:

    • Review the output of the EA governance assessment and gather feedback on your goals for the EA practice.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Discuss whether you are ready to proceed with the project.
    • Review the list of tasks and plan your next steps.

    With these tools & templates:

    • EA Governance Assessment Tool

    Right-size EA governance based on organizational complexity

    Determining organizational complexity is not rocket science. Use Info-Tech’s tool to quantify the complexity and use it, along with common sense, to determine the appropriate level of architecture governance.

    Info-Tech’s methodology uses six factors to determine the complexity of the organization:

    1. The size of the organization, which can often be denoted by the revenue, headcount, number of applications in use, and geographical diversity.
    2. The solution alignment factor helps indicate the degree to which various projects map to the organization’s strategy.
    3. The size and complexity of the IT infrastructure and networks.
    4. The portfolio of applications maintained by the IT organization.
    5. Key changes within the organization such as M&A, regulatory changes, or a change in business or technology leadership.
    6. Other negative influences that can adversely affect the organization.

    Determine your organization’s level of complexity

    1.1 2 hours

    Input

    • Group consensus on the current state of EA competencies.

    Output

    • A list of gaps that need to be addressed for EA governance competencies.

    Materials

    • Info-Tech’s EA assessment tool, a computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, business line leads, IT department leads.

    The image shows a screenshot of the Table of Contents with the EA Capability section highlighted.

    Step 1 - Facilitate

    Download the EA Capability – Risk and Complexity Assessment Tool to facilitate a session on determining your organization’s complexity.

    Download EA Organizational - Risk and Complexity Assessment Tool

    Step 2 - Summarize

    Summarize the results in the EA governance framework document.

    Update the EA Governance Framework Template

    Understand the components of effective EA governance

    EA governance is multi-faceted and it facilitates effective use of resources to meet organizational strategic objectives through well-defined structural elements.

    EA Governance

    • Fundamentals
    • Engagement Model
    • Policy
    • Governing Bodies
    • Architectural Standards

    Components of architecture governance

    1. EA vision, mission, goals, metrics, and principles that provide a direction for the EA practice.
    2. An engagement model showing where and in what fashion EA is engaged in the IT operating model.
    3. An architecture policy formulated and enforced by the architectural governing bodies to guide and constrain architectural choices in pursuit of strategic goals.
    4. Governing bodies to assess projects for compliance and provide feedback.
    5. Architectural standards that codify the EA work products to ensure consistent development of architecture.

    Next Step: Based on the organization’s complexity, conduct a current state assessment of EA governance using Info-Tech’s EA Governance Assessment Tool.

    Assess the components of EA governance in your organization

    1.2 2 hrs

    Input

    • Group consensus on the current state of EA competencies.

    Output

    • A list of gaps that need to be addressed for EA governance competencies.

    Materials

    • Info-Tech’s EA assessment tool, a computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, business line leads, IT department leads.

    The image shows a screenshot of the Table of Contents with the EA Governance section highlighted.

    Step 1 - Facilitate

    Download the “EA Governance Assessment Tool” to facilitate a session on identifying the best practices to be applied in your organization.

    Download Info-Tech’s EA Governance Assessment Tool

    Step 2 - Summarize

    Summarize the identified best practices in the EA governance framework document.

    Update the EA Governance Framework Template


    Conduct a current state assessment to identify limitations of the existing EA governance framework

    CASE STUDY

    Industry Insurance

    Source Info-Tech

    Situation

    INSPRO01 was planning a major transformation initiative. The organization determined that EA is a strategic function.

    The CIO had pledged support to the EA group and had given them a mandate to deliver long-term strategic architecture.

    The business leaders did not trust the EA team and believed that lack of business skills in the group put the business transformation at risk.

    Complication

    The EA group had been traditionally seen as a technology organization that helps with software design.

    The EA team lacked understanding of the business and hence there had been no common language between business and technology.

    Result

    Info-Tech helped the EA team create a set of 10 architectural principles that are business-value driven rather than technical statements.

    The team socialized the principles with the business and technology stakeholders and got their approvals.

    By applying the business focused architectural principles, the EA team was able to connect with the business leaders and gain their support.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    Key Activities

    • Determine organizational complexity.
    • Conduct an assessment of the EA governance components.
    • Identify and prioritize gaps.

    Outcomes

    • Organizational complexity assessment
    • EA governance capability assessment
    • A prioritized list of capability gaps

    Phase 2

    EA Fundamentals

    Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework

    EA Fundamentals

    1. Current State of EA Governance
    2. EA Fundamentals
    3. Engagement Model
    4. EA Governing Bodies
    5. EA Policy
    6. Architectural Standards
    7. Communication Plan

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Craft the EA vision and mission
    • Develop the EA principles.
    • Identify the EA goals

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Leaders
    • Business Leaders
    • Head of Enterprise Architecture
    • Enterprise Architects
    • Domain Architects
    • Solution Architects

    Outcomes of this step

    • Refined set of EA fundamentals to support the building of EA governance

    Info-Tech Insight

    A house divided against itself cannot stand – ensure that the EA fundamentals are aligned with the organization’s goals and objectives.

    Phase 2 guided implementation outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 2: EA Fundamentals

    Proposed Time to Completion: 3 weeks

    Step 2.1: Develop the EA fundamentals

    Review findings with analyst:

    • Discuss the importance of the EA fundamentals – vision, mission, goals, measures, and principles.
    • Understand how to align the EA vision, mission, goals, and measures to your organization’s vision, mission, goals, measures, and principles.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Develop the EA vision statements.
    • Craft the EA mission statements.
    • Define EA goals and measures.
    • Adopt EA principles.

    With these tools & templates:

    • EA Vision and Mission Template
    • EA Principles Template
    • EA Goals and Measures Template

    Step 2.2: Review the EA fundamentals

    Review findings with analyst:

    • Review the EA fundamentals in conjunction with the results of the EA governance assessment tool and gather feedback.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Refine the EA vision, mission, goals, measures, and principles.
    • Review the list of tasks and plan your next steps.

    With these tools & templates:

    • EA Vision and Mission Template
    • EA Principles Template
    • EA Goals and Measures Template

    Fundamentals of an EA organization

    Vision, mission, goals and measures, and principles form the foundation of the EA function.

    Factors to consider when developing the vision and mission statements

    The vision and mission statements provide strategic direction to the EA team. These statements should be created based on the business and technology drivers in the organization.

    Business Drivers

    • Business drivers are factors that determine, or cause, an increase in value or major improvement of a business.
    • Examples of business drivers include:
      • Increased revenue
      • Customer retention
      • Salesforce effectiveness
      • Innovation

    Technology Drivers

    • Technology drivers are factors that are vital for the continued success and growth of a business using effective technologies.
    • Examples of technology drivers include:
      • Enterprise integration
      • Information security
      • Portability
      • Interoperability

    "The very essence of leadership is [that] you have a vision. It's got to be a vision you articulate clearly and forcefully on every occasion. You can't blow an uncertain trumpet." – Theodore Hesburgh

    Develop vision, mission, goals, measures, and principles to define the EA capability direction and purpose

    EA capability vision statement

    Articulates the desired future state of EA capability expressed in the present tense.

    • What will be the role of EA capability?
    • How will EA capability be perceived?

    Example: To be recognized by both the business and IT as a trusted partner that drives [Company Name]’s effectiveness, efficiency, and agility.

    EA capability mission statement

    Articulates the fundamental purpose of the EA capability.

    • Why does EA capability exist?
    • What does EA capability do to realize its vision?
    • Who are the key customers of the EA capability?

    Example: Define target enterprise architecture for [Company Name], identify solution opportunities, inform IT investment management, and direct solution development, acquisition, and operation compliance.

    EA capability goals and measures

    EA capability goals define specific desired outcomes of an EA management process execution. EA capability measures define how to validate the achievement of the EA capability goals.

    Example:

    Goal: Improve reuse of IT assets at [Company Name].

    Measures:

    • The number of building blocks available for reuse.
    • Percent of projects that utilized existing building blocks.
    • Estimated efficiency gain (= effort to create a building block * reuse count).

    EA principles

    EA principles are shared, long-lasting beliefs that guide the use of IT in constructing, transforming, and operating the enterprise by informing and restricting target-state enterprise architecture design, solution development, and procurement decisions.

    Example:

    • EA principle name: Reuse.
    • Statement: Maximize reuse of existing assets.
    • Rationale: Reuse prevents duplication of development and support efforts, increasing efficiency, and agility.
    • Implications: Define architecture and solution building blocks and ensure their consistent application.

    EA principles guide decision making

    Policies can be seen as “the letter of the law,” whereas EA principles summarize “the spirit of the law.”

    The image shows a graphic with EA Principles listed at the top, with an arrow pointing down to Decisions on the use of IT. At the bottom are domain-specific policies, with two arrows pointing upwards: the arrow on the left is labelled direct, and the arrow on the right is labelled control. The arrow points up to the label Decisions on the use of IT. On the left, there is an arrow pointing both up and down. At the top it is labelled The spirit of the law, and at the bottom, The letter of the law. On the right, there is another arrow pointing both up and down, labelled How should decisions be made at the top and labelled Who has the accountability and authority to make decisions? at the bottom.

    Define EA capability goals and related measures that resonate with EA capability stakeholders

    EA capability goals, i.e. specific desired outcomes of an EA management process execution. Use COBIT 5, APO03 process goals, and metrics as a starting point.

    The image shows a chart titled Manage Enterprise Architecture.

    Define relevant business value measures to collect indirect evidence of EA’s contribution to business benefits

    Define key operational measures for internal use by IT and EA practitioners. Also, define business value measures that communicate and demonstrate the value of EA as an enabler of business outcomes to senior executives.

    EA performance measures (lead, operational) EA value measures (lag)
    Application of EA management process EA’s contribution to IT performance EA’s contribution to business value

    Enterprise Architecture Management

    • Number of months since the last review of target state EA blueprints.

    IT Investment Portfolio Management

    • Percentage of projects that were identified and proposed by EA.

    Solution Development

    • Number of projects that passed EA reviews.
    • Number of building blocks reused.

    Operations Management

    • Reduction in the number of applications with overlapping functionality.

    Business Value

    • Lower non-discretionary IT spend.
    • Decreased time to production.
    • Higher satisfaction of IT-enabled services.

    Refine the organization’s EA fundamentals

    2.1 2 hrs

    Input

    • Group consensus on the current state of EA competencies.

    Output

    • A list of gaps that need to be addressed for EA governance competencies.

    Materials

    • Info-Tech’s EA assessment tool, a computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, business line leads, IT department leads.

    The image shows the Table of Contents with four sections highlighted, beginning with EA Vision Statement and ending with EA Goals and Measures.

    Step 1 - Facilitate

    Download the three templates and hold a working session to facilitate a session on creating EA fundamentals.

    Download the EA Vision and Mission Template, the EA Principles Template, and the EA Goals and Measures Template

    Step 2 - Summarize

    Document the final vision, mission, principles, goals, and measures within the EA Governance Framework.

    Update the EA Governance Framework Template


    Ensure that the EA fundamentals are aligned to the organizational needs

    CASE STUDY

    Industry Insurance

    Source Info-Tech

    Situation

    The EA group at INSPRO01 was being pulled in multiple directions with requests ranging from architecture review to solution design to code reviews.

    Project level architecture was being practiced with no clarity on the end goal. This led to EA being viewed as just another IT function without any added benefits.

    Info-Tech recommended that the EA team ensure that the fundamentals (vision, mission, principles, goals, and measures) reflect what the team aspired to achieve before fixing any of the process concerns.

    Complication

    The EA team was mostly comprised of technical people and hence the best practices outlined were not driven by business value.

    The team had no documented vision and mission statements in place. In addition, the existing goals and measures were not tied to the business strategic objectives.

    The team had architectural principles documented, but there were too many and they were very technical in nature.

    Result

    With Info-Tech’s guidance, the team developed a vision and mission statement to succinctly communicate the purpose of the EA function.

    The team also reduced and simplified the EA principles to make sure they were value driven and communicated in business terms.

    Finally, the team proposed goals and measures to track the performance of the EA team.

    With the fundamentals in place, the team was able to show the value of EA and gain organization-wide acceptance.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    Key Activities

    • Craft the EA vision and mission.
    • Develop the EA principles.
    • Identify the EA goals.

    Outcomes

    • Refined set of EA fundamentals to support the building of EA governance.

    Phase 3

    Engagement Model

    Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework

    Engagement Model

    1. Current state of EA governance
    2. EA fundamentals
    3. Engagement model
    4. EA governing bodies
    5. EA policy
    6. Architectural standards
    7. Communication Plan

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Build the case for EA engagement
    • Engagement touchpoints within the IT operating model

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Leaders
    • Business Leaders
    • Head of Enterprise Architecture
    • Enterprise Architects
    • Domain Architects
    • Solution Architects

    Outcomes of this step

    • Summary of the assessment of the current EA engagement model
    • Target EA engagement model

    Info-Tech Insight

    Perform due diligence prior to decision making. Use the EA Engagement Model to promote conversations between stage gate meetings as opposed to having the conversation during the stage gate meetings.

    Phase 3 guided implementation outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 3: EA engagement model

    Proposed Time to Completion: 2 weeks

    Step 3.1 Review the current IT operating model

    Start with an analyst kick-off call:

    • Review Info-Tech’s IT operating model.
    • Understand how to document your organization’s IT operating model.
    • Document EA’s current role and responsibility at each stage of the IT operating model.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Document your organization’s IT operating model.

    With these tools & templates:

    • EA Engagement Model Template

    Step 3.2: Determine the target engagement model

    Review findings with analyst:

    • Review your organization’s current state IT operating model.
    • Review your EA’s role and responsibility at each stage of the IT operating model.
    • Document the role and responsibility of EA in the future state.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Document EA’s future role within each stage of your organization’s IT operating model.

    With these tools & templates:

    • EA Engagement Model Template.

    The three pillars of EA Engagement

    Effective EA engagement revolves around three basic principles – generating business benefits, creating adaptable models, and being able to replicate the process across the organization.

    Business Value Driven

    Focus on generating business value from organizational investments.

    Repeatable

    Process should be standardized, transparent, and repeatable so that it can be consistently applied across the organization.

    Flexible

    Accommodate the varying needs of projects of different sizes.

    Where these pillars meet: Advocates long-term strategic vs. short-term tactical solutions.

    EA interaction points within the IT operating model

    EA’s engagement in each stage within the plan, build, and run phases should be clearly defined and communicated.

    Plan Strategy Development Business Planning Conceptualization Portfolio Management
    Build Requirements Solution Design Application Development/ Procurement Quality Assurance
    Run Deploy Operate

    Document the organization’s current IT operating model

    3.1 2-3 hr

    Input

    • IT project lifecycle

    Output

    • Organization’s current IT operating model.

    Materials

    • A computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, IT department leads, business leaders.

    Instructions:

    Hold a working session with the participants to document the current IT operating model. Facilitate the activity using the following steps:

    1. Map out the IT operating model.

    1. Find a project that was just deployed within the organization and backtrack every step of the way to the strategy development that resulted in the conception of the project.
    2. Interview the personnel involved with each step of the process to get a sense of whether or not projects usually move to deployment going through these steps.
    3. Review Info-Tech’s best-practice IT operating model presented in the EA Engagement Model Template, and add or remove any steps to the existing organization’s IT operating model as necessary. Document the finalized steps of the IT operating model.

    2. Determine EA’s current role in the operating model.

    1. Interview EA personnel through each step of the process and ask them their role. This is to get a sense of the type of input that EA is having into each step of the process.
    2. Using the EA Engagement Model Template, document the current role of EA in each step of the organization’s IT operation as you complete the interviews.

    Download the EA Engagement Model Template to document the organization’s current IT operating model.

    Define RACI in every stage of the IT operating model (e.g. EA role in strategy development phase of the IT operating model is presented below)

    Strategy Development

    Also known as strategic planning, strategy development is fundamental to creating and running a business. It involves the creation of a longer-term game plan or vision that sets specific goals and objectives for a business.

    R Those in charge of performing the task. These are the people actively involved in the completion of the required work. Business VPs, EA, IT directors R
    A The one ultimately answerable for the correct and thorough completion of the deliverable or task, and the one who delegates the work to those responsible. CEO A
    C Those whose opinions are sought before a decision is made, and with whom there is two-way communication. PMO, Line managers, etc. C
    I Those who are kept up to date on progress, and with whom there is one-way communication. Development managers, etc. I

    Next Step: Similarly define the RACI for each stage of the IT operating model; refer to the activity slide for prompts.

    Best practices on the role of EA within the IT operating model

    Plan

    Strategy Development

    C

    Business Planning

    C

    Conceptualization

    A

    Portfolio Management

    C

    Build

    Requirements

    C

    Solution Design

    R

    Application Development/ Procurement

    R

    Quality Assurance

    I

    Run

    Deploy

    I

    Operate

    I

    Next Step: Define the role of EA in each stage of the IT operating model; refer to the activity slide for prompts.

    Define EA’s target role in each step of the IT operating model

    3.2 2 hrs

    Input

    • Organization’s IT operating model.

    Output

    • Organization’s EA engagement model.

    Materials

    • A computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, CIO, business leaders, IT department leaders.

    The image shows the Table of Contents for the EA Engagement Model Template with the EA Engagement Summary section highlighted.

    Step 1 - Facilitate

    Download the EA Engagement Model Template and hold a working session to define EA’s target role in each step of the IT operating model.

    Download the EA Engagement Model Template

    Step 2 - Summarize

    Document the target state role of EA within the EA Governance Framework document.

    Update the EA Governance Framework Template


    Design an EA engagement model to formalize EA’s role within the IT operating model

    CASE STUDY

    Industry Insurance

    Source Info-Tech

    Situation

    INSPRO01 had a high IT cost structure with looming technology debt due to a preference for short-term tactical gains over long-term solutions.

    The business satisfaction with IT was at an all-time low due to expensive solutions that did not meet business needs.

    INSPRO01’s technology landscape was in disarray with many overlapping systems and interoperability issues.

    Complication

    No single team within the organization had an end-to-end perspective all the way from strategy to project execution. A lot of information was being lost in handoffs between different teams.

    This led to inconsistent design/solution patterns being applied. Investment decisions had not been grounded in reality and this often led to cost overruns.

    Result

    Info-Tech helped INSPRO01 identify opportunities for EA team engagement at different stages of the IT operating model. EA’s role within each stage was clearly defined and documented.

    With Info-Tech’s help, the EA team successfully made the case for engagement upfront during strategy development rather than during project execution.

    The increased transparency enabled the EA team to ensure that investments were aligned to organizational strategic goals and objectives.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    Key Activities

    • Build the case for EA engagement.
    • Identify engagement touchpoints within the IT operating model.

    Outcomes

    • Summary of the assessment of the current EA engagement model
    • Target EA engagement model

    Phase 4

    EA Governing Bodies

    Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework

    EA Governing Bodies

    1. Current state of EA governance
    2. EA fundamentals
    3. Engagement model
    4. EA governing bodies
    5. EA policy
    6. Architectural standards
    7. Communication Plan

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify the number of governing bodies
    • Define the game plan to initialize the governing bodies
    • Define the architecture review process

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Leaders
    • Business Leaders
    • Head of Enterprise Architecture
    • Enterprise Architects
    • Domain Architects
    • Solution Architects

    Outcomes of this step

    • Charter definition for each EA governance board

    Info-Tech Insight

    Use architecture governance like a scalpel rather than a hatchet. Implement governing bodies to provide guidance rather than act as a police force.

    Phase 4 guided implementation

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 4: Create or identify EA governing bodies

    Proposed Time to Completion: 2 weeks

    Step 4.1: Identify architecture boards and develop charters

    Start with an analyst kick-off call:

    • Understand the factors influencing the number of governing bodies required for an organization.
    • Understand the components of a governing body charter.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Identify how many governing bodies are needed.
    • Define EA governing body composition, meeting frequency, and domain of coverage.
    • Define the inputs and outputs of each EA governing body.
    • Identify mandatory inclusion criteria.

    With these tools & templates:

    • Architecture Board Charter Template

    Step 4.2: Develop an architecture review process

    Follow-up with an analyst call:

    • Review the number of boards identified for your organization and gather feedback.
    • Review the charters developed for each governing body and gather feedback.
    • Understand the various factors that impact the architecture review process.
    • Review Info-Tech’s best-practice architecture review process.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Refine the charters for governing bodies.
    • Develop the architecture review process for your organization.

    With these tools & templates:

    • Architecture Review Process Template

    Factors that determine the number of architectural boards required

    The primary purpose of architecture boards is to ensure that business benefits are maximized and solution design is within the options set forth by the architectural reference models without introducing additional layers of bureaucracy.

    The optimal number of architecture boards required in an organization is a function of the following factors:

    • EA organization model
      • Distributed
      • Federated
      • Centralized
    • Architecture domains Maturity of architecture domains
    • Project throughput

    Commonly observed architecture boards:

    • Architecture Review Board
    • Technical Architecture Committee
    • Data Architecture Review Board
    • Infrastructure Architecture Review Board
    • Security Architecture Review Board

    Info-Tech Insight

    Before building out a new governance board, start small by repurposing existing forums by adding architecture as an agenda item. As the items for review increase consider introducing dedicated governing bodies.

    EA organization model drives the architecture governance structure

    EA teams can be organized in three ways – distributed, federated, and centralized. Each model has its own strengths and weaknesses. EA governance must be structured in a way such that the strengths are harvested and the weaknesses are mitigated.

    Distributed Federated Centralized
    EA org. structure
    • No overarching EA team exists and segment architects report to line of business (LOB) executives.
    • A centralized EA team exists with segment architects reporting to LOB executives and dotted-line to head of (centralized) EA.
    • A centralized EA capability exists with enterprise architects reporting to the head of EA.
    Implications
    • Produces a fragmented and disjointed collection of architectures.
    • Economies of scale are not realized.
    • High cross-silo integration effort.
    • LOB-specific approach to EA.
    • Requires dual reporting relationships.
    • Additional effort is required to coordinate centralized EA policies and blueprints with segment EA policies and blueprints.
    • Accountabilities may be unclear.
    • Can be less responsive to individual LOB needs, because the centralized EA capability must analyze needs of multiple LOBs and various trade-off options to avoid specialized, one-off solutions.
    • May impede innovation.
    Architectural boards
    • Cross LOB working groups to create architecture standards, patterns, and common services.
    • Local boards to support responsiveness to LOB-specific needs.
    • Cross LOB working groups to create architecture standards, patterns and common services.
    • Cross-enterprise boards to ensure adherence to enterprise standards and reduce integration costs.
    • Local boards to support responsiveness to LOB specific needs.
    • Enterprise working groups to create architecture standards, patterns, and all services.
    • Central board to ensure adherence to enterprise standards.

    Architecture domains influences the number of architecture boards required

    • An architecture review board (ARB) provides direction for domain-specific boards and acts as an escalation point. The ARB must have the right mix of both business and technology stakeholders.
    • Domain-specific boards provide a platform to have focused discussions on items specific to that domain.
    • Based on project throughput and the maturity of each domain, organizations would have to pick the optimal number of boards.
    • Architecture working groups provide a platform for cross-domain conversations to establish organization wide standards.
    Level 1 Architecture Review Board IT and Business Leaders
    Level 2 Business Architecture Board Data Architecture Board Application Architecture Board Infrastructure Architecture Board Security Architecture Board IT and Business Managers
    Level 3 Architecture Working Groups Architects

    Create a game plan for the architecture boards

    • Start with a single board for each level – an architecture review board (ARB), a technical architecture committee (TAC), and architecture working groups.
    • As the organization matures and the number of requests to the TAC increase, consider creating domain-specific boards – such as business architecture, data architecture, application architecture, etc. – to handle architecture decisions pertaining to that domain.

    Start with this:

    Level 1 Architecture Review Board
    Level 2 Technical Architecture Committee
    Level 3 Architecture Working Groups

    Change to this:

    Architecture Review Board IT and Business Leaders
    Business Architecture Board Data Architecture Board Application Architecture Board Infrastructure Architecture Board Security Architecture Board IT and Business Managers
    Architecture Working Groups Architects

    Architecture boards have different objectives and activities

    The boards at each level should be set up with the correct agenda – ensure that the boards’ composition and activities reflect their objective. Use the entry criteria to communicate the agenda for their meetings.

    Architecture Review Board Technical Architecture Committee
    Objective
    • Evaluates business strategy, needs, and priorities, sets direction and acts as a decision making authority of the EA capability.
    • Directs the development of target state architecture.
    • Monitors performance and compliance of the architectural standards.
    • Monitor project solution architecture compliance to standards, regulations, EA principles, and target state EA blueprints.
    • Review EA compliance waiver requests, make recommendations, and escalate to the architecture review board (ARB).
    Composition
    • Business Leadership
    • IT Leadership
    • Head of Enterprise Architecture
    • Business Managers
    • IT Managers
    • Architects
    Activities
    • Review compliance of conceptual solution to standards.
    • Discuss the enterprise implications of the proposed solution.
    • Select and approve vendors.
    • Review detailed solution design.
    • Discuss the risks of the proposed solution.
    • Discuss the cost of the proposed solution.
    • Review and recommend vendors.
    Entry Criteria
    • Changes to IT Enterprise Technology Policy.
    • Changes to the technology management plan.
    • Approve changes to enterprise technology inventory/portfolio.
    • Ongoing operational cost impacts.
    • Detailed estimates for the solution are ready for review.
    • There are significant changes to protocols or technologies responsible for solution.
    • When the project is deviating from baselined architectures.

    Identify the number of governing bodies

    4.1 2 hrs

    Input

    • EA Vision and Mission
    • EA Engagement Model

    Output

    • A list of EA governing bodies.

    Materials

    • A computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, CIO, business line leads, IT department leads.

    Instructions:

    Hold a working session with the participants to identify the number of governing bodies. Facilitate the activity using the following steps:

    1. Examine the EA organization models mentioned previously. Assess how your organization is structured, and identify whether your organization has a federated, distributed or centralized EA organization model.
    2. Reference the “Game plan for the architecture boards” slide. Assess the architecture domains, and define how many there are in the organization.
    3. Architecture domains:
      1. If no defined architecture domains exist, model the number of governing bodies in the organization based on the “Start with this” scenario in the “Game plan for the architecture boards” slide.
      2. If defined architecture domains do exist, model the number of governing bodies based on the “Change to this” scenario in the “Game plan for the architecture boards” slide.
    4. Name each governing body you have defined in the previous step. Download Info-Tech’s Architecture Board Charter Template for each domain you have named. Input the names into the title of each downloaded template.

    Download the Architecture Board Charter Template to document this activity.

    Defining the governing body charter

    The charter represents the agreement between the governing body and its stakeholders about the value proposition and obligations to the organization.

    1. Purpose: The reason for the existence of the governing body and its goals and objectives.
    2. Composition: The members who make up the committee and their roles and responsibilities in it.
    3. Frequency of meetings: The frequency at which the committee gathers to discuss items and make decisions.
    4. Entry/Exit Criteria: The criteria by which the committee selects items for review and items for which decisions can be taken.
    5. Inputs: Materials that are provided as inputs for review and decision making by the committee.
    6. Outputs: Materials that are provided by the committee after an item has been reviewed and the decision made.
    7. Activities: Actions undertaken by the committee to arrive at its decision.

    Define EA’s target role in each step of the IT operating model

    4.2 3 hrs

    Input

    • A list of all identified EA governing bodies.

    Output

    • Charters for each EA governing bodies.

    Materials

    • A computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, business line leads, IT department leads.

    The image shows the Table of Contents for the EA Governance Framework document, with the Architecture Board Charters highlighted.

    Step 1 Facilitate

    Hold a working session with the stakeholders to define the charter for each of the identified architecture boards.

    Download Architecture Board Charter Template

    Step 2 Summarize

    • Summarize the objectives of each board and reference the charter document within the EA Governance Framework.
    • Upload the final charter document to the team’s common repository.

    Update the EA Governance Framework document


    Considerations when creating an architecture review process

    • Ensure that architecture review happens at major milestones within the organization’s IT Operating Model such as the plan, build, and run phases.
    • In order to provide continuous engagement, make the EA group accountable for solution architecture in the plan phase. In the build phase, the EA group will be consulted while the solution architect will be responsible for the project solution architecture.

    Plan

    • Strategy Development
    • Business Planning
    • A - Conceptualization
    • Portfolio Management

    Build

    • Requirements
    • R - Solution Design
    • Application Development/ Procurement
    • Quality Assurance

    Run

    • Deploy
    • Operate

    Best-practice project architecture review process

    The best-practice model presented facilitates the creation of sound solution architecture through continuous engagement with the EA team and well-defined governance checkpoints.

    The image shows a graphic of the best-practice model. At the left, four categories are listed: Committees; EA; Project Team; LOB. At the top, three categories are listed: Plan; Build; Run. Within the area between these categories is a flow chart demonstrating the best-practice model and specific checkpoints throughout.

    Develop the architecture review process

    4.3 2 hours

    Input

    • A list of all EA governing bodies.
    • Info-Tech’s best practice architecture review process.

    Output

    • The new architecture review process.

    Materials

    • A computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, business line leads, IT department leads.

    Hold a working session with the participants to develop the architecture review process. Facilitate the activity using the following steps:

    1. Reference Info-Tech’s best-practice architecture review process embedded within the “Architecture Review Process Template” to gain an understanding of an ideal architecture review process.
    2. Identify the stages within the plan, build, and run phases where solution architecture reviews should occur, and identify the governing bodies involved in these reviews.
    3. As you go through these stages, record your findings in the Architecture Review Process Template.
    4. Connect the various activities leading to and from the architecture creation points to outline the review process.

    Download the Architecture Review Process Template for additional guidance regarding developing an architecture review process.

    Develop the architecture review process

    4.3 2 hrs

    Input

    • A list of all identified EA governing bodies.

    Output

    • Charters for each EA governing bodies.

    Materials

    • A computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, business line leads, IT department leads.

    The image shows a screenshot of the Table of Contents, with the Architecture Review Process highlighted.

    Step 1 - Facilitate

    Download Architecture Review Process Template and facilitate a session to customize the best-practice model presented in the template.

    Download the Architecture Review Process Template

    Step 2 - Summarize

    Summarize the process changes and document the process flow in the EA Governance Framework document.

    Update the EA Governance Framework Template

    Right-size EA governing bodies to reduce the perception of red tape

    Case Study

    Industry Insurance

    Source Info-Tech

    Situation

    At INSPRO01, architecture governance boards were a bottleneck. The boards fielded all project requests, ranging from simple screen label changes to complex initiatives spanning multiple applications.

    These boards were designed as forums for technology discussions without any business stakeholder involvement.

    Complication

    INSPRO01’s management never gave buy-in to the architecture governance boards since their value was uncertain.

    Additionally, architectural reviews were perceived as an item to be checked off rather than a forum for getting feedback.

    Architectural exceptions were not being followed through due to the lack of a dispensation process.

    Result

    Info-Tech has helped the team define adaptable inclusion/exclusion criteria (based on project complexity) for each of the architectural governing boards.

    The EA team was able to make the case for business participation in the architecture forums to better align business and technology investment.

    An architecture dispensation process was created and operationalized. As a result architecture reviews became more transparent with well-defined next steps.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    Key Activities

    • Identify the number of governing bodies.
    • Define the game plan to initialize the governing bodies.
    • Define the architecture review process.

    Outcomes

    • Charter definition for each EA governance board

    Phase 5

    EA Policy

    Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework

    EA Policy

    1. Current state of EA governance
    2. EA fundamentals
    3. Engagement model
    4. EA governing bodies
    5. EA policy
    6. Architectural standards
    7. Communication Plan

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Define the EA policy scope
    • Identify the target audience
    • Determine the inclusion and exclusion criteria
    • Create an assessment checklist

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Leaders
    • Business Leaders
    • Head of Enterprise Architecture
    • Enterprise Architects
    • Domain Architects
    • Solution Architects

    Outcomes of this step

    • The completed EA policy
    • Project assessment checklist
    • Defined assessment outcomes
    • Completed compliance waiver process

    Info-Tech Insight

    Use the EA policy to promote EA’s commitment to deliver value to business stakeholders through process transparency, stakeholder engagement, and compliance.

    Phase 5 guided implementation

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 5: EA Policy

    Proposed Time to Completion: 3 weeks

    Step 5.1–5.3: EA Policy, Assessment Checklists, and Decision Types

    Start with an analyst kick-off call:

    • Discuss the three pillars of EA policy and its purpose.
    • Review the components of an effective EA policy.
    • Understand how to develop architecture assessment checklists.
    • Understand the assessment decision types.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Define purpose, scope, and audience of the EA policy.
    • Create a project assessment checklist.
    • Define the organization’s assessment decision type.

    With these tools & templates:

    • EA Policy Template
    • EA Assessment Checklist Template

    Step 5.4: Compliance Waivers

    Review findings with analyst:

    • Review your draft EA policy and gather feedback.
    • Review your project assessment checklists and the assessment decision types.
    • Discuss the best-practice architecture compliance waiver process and how to tailor it to your organizational needs.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Refine the EA policy based on feedback gathered.
    • Create the compliance waiver process.

    With these tools & templates:

    • EA Compliance Waiver Process Template
    • EA Compliance Waiver Form Template

    Three pillars of architecture policy

    Architecture policy is a set of guidelines, formulated and enforced by the governing bodies of an organization, to guide and constrain architectural choices in pursuit of strategic goals.

    Architecture compliance – promotes compliance to organizational standards through well-defined assessment checklists across architectural domains.

    Business value – ensures that investments are tied to business value by enforcing traceability to business capabilities.

    Architectural guidance – provides guidance to architecture practitioners on the application of the business and technology standards.

    Components of EA policy

    An enterprise architecture policy is an actionable document that can be applied to projects of varying complexity across the organization.

    1. Purpose and Scope: This EA policy document clearly defines the scope and the objectives of architecture reviews within an organization.
    2. Target Audience: The intended audience of the policy such as employees and partners.
    3. Architecture Assessment Checklist: A wide range of typical questions that may be used in conducting Architecture Compliance reviews, relating to various aspects of the architecture.
    4. Assessment Outcomes: The outcome of the architecture review process that determines the conformance of a project solution to the enterprise architecture standards.
    5. Compliance Waiver: Used when a solution or segment architecture is perceived to be non-compliant with the enterprise architecture.

    Draft the purpose and scope of the EA policy

    5.1 2.5 hrs

    Input

    • A consensus on the purpose, scope, and audience for the EA policy.

    Output

    • Documented version of the purpose, scope, and audience for the EA policy.

    Materials

    • A computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, CIO, business line leads, IT department leads.

    The image shows a screenshot of the Table of Contents with the EA Policy section highlighted.

    Step 1 - Facilitate

    Download the EA Policy Template and hold a working session to draft the EA policy.

    Download the EA Policy Template

    Step 2 - Summarize

    • Summarize purpose, scope, and intended audience of the policy in the EA Governance Framework document.
    • Update the EA policy document with the purpose, scope and intended audience.

    Update the EA Governance Framework Template

    Architecture assessment checklist

    Architecture assessment checklist is a list of future-looking criteria that a project will be assessed against. It provides a set of standards against which projects can be assessed in order to render a decision on whether or not the project can be greenlighted.

    Architecture checklists should be created for each EA domain since each domain provides guidance on specific aspects of the project.

    Sample Checklist Questions

    Business Architecture:

    • Is the project aligned to organizational strategic goals and objectives?
    • What are the business capabilities that the project supports? Is it creating new capabilities or supporting an existing one?

    Data Architecture:

    • What processes are in place to support data referential integrity and/or normalization?
    • What is the physical data model definition (derived from logical data models) used to design the database?

    Application Architecture:

    • Can this application be placed on an application server independent of all other applications? If not, explain the dependencies.
    • Can additional parallel application servers be easily added? If so, what is the load balancing mechanism?

    Infrastructure Architecture:

    • Does the solution provide high-availability and fault-tolerance that can recover from events within a datacenter?

    Security Architecture:

    • Have you ensured that the corporate security policies and guidelines to which you are designing are the latest versions?

    Create architectural assessment checklists

    5.2 2 hrs

    Input

    • Reference architecture models.

    Output

    • Architecture assessment checklist.

    Materials

    • A computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, business line leads, IT department leads.

    The image shows a screenshot of the Table of Contents with the EA Assessment Checklist section highlighted.

    Step 1 - Facilitate

    Download the EA Assessment Checklist Template and hold a working session to create the architectural assessment checklists.

    Download the EA Assessment Checklist Template

    Step 2 - Summarize

    • Summarize the major points of the checklists in the EA Governance Framework document.
    • Update the EA policy document with the detailed architecture assessment checklists.

    Update the EA Governance Framework Template

    Architecture assessment decision types

    • As a part of the proposed solution review, the governing bodies produce a decision indicating the compliance of the solution architecture with the enterprise standards.
    • Go, No Go, or Conditional are a sample set of decision outcomes available to the governing bodies.
    • On a conditional approval, the project team must file for a compliance waiver.

    Approved

    • The solution demonstrates substantial compliance with standards.
    • Negligible risk to the organization or minimal risks with sound plans of how to mitigate them.
    • Architectural approval to proceed with delivery type of work.

    Conditional Approval

    • The significant aspects of the solution have been addressed in a satisfactory manner.
    • Yet, there are some aspects of the solution that are not compliant with standards.
    • The architectural approval is conditional upon presenting the missing evidence within a minimal period of time determined.
    • The risk level may be acceptable to the organization from an overall IT governance perspective.

    Not Approved

    • The solution is not compliant with the standards.
    • Scheduled for a follow-up review.
    • Not recommended to proceed until the solution is more compliant with the standards.

    Best-practice architecture compliance waiver process

    Waivers are not permanent. Waiver terms must be documented for each waiver specifying:

    • Time period after which the architecture in question will be compliant with the enterprise architecture.
    • The modifications necessary to the enterprise architecture to accommodate the solution.

    The image shows a flow chart, split into 4 sections: Enterprise Architect; Solution Architect; TAC; ARB. To the right of these section labels, there is a flow chart that documents the waiver process.

    Create compliance waiver process

    5.4 3-4 hrs

    Input

    • A consensus on the compliance waiver process.

    Output

    • Documented compliance waiver process and form.

    Materials

    • A computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, business line leads, IT department leads.

    The image shows the Table of Contents with the Compliance Waiver Form section highlighted.

    Step 1 - Facilitate

    Download the EA compliance waiver template and hold a working session to customize the best-practice process to your organization’s needs.

    Download the EA Compliance Waiver Process Template

    Step 2 - Summarize

    • Summarize the objectives and high-level process in the EA Governance Framework document.
    • Update the EA policy document with the compliance waiver process.
    • Upload the final policy document to the team’s common repository.

    Update the EA Governance Framework Template

    Creates an enterprise architecture policy to drive adoption

    Case Study

    Industry Insurance

    Source Info-Tech

    Situation

    EA program adoption across INSPRO01 was at its lowest point due to a lack of transparency into the activities performed by the EA group.

    Often, projects ignored EA entirely as it was viewed as a nebulous and non-value-added activity that produced no measurable results.

    Complication

    There was very little documented information about the architecture assessment process and the standards against which project solution architectures were evaluated.

    Additionally, there were no well-defined outcomes for the assessment.

    Project groups were left speculating about the next steps and with little guidance on what to do after completing an assessment.

    Result

    Info-Tech helped the EA team create an EA policy containing architecture significance criteria, assessment checklists, and reference to the architecture review process.

    Additionally, the team also identified guidelines and detailed next steps for projects based on the outcome of the architecture assessment.

    These actions brought clarity to EA processes and fostered better engagement with the EA group.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    Key Activities

    • Define the scope.
    • Identify the target audience.
    • Determine the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
    • Create an assessment checklist.

    Outcomes

    • The completed EA policy
    • Project assessment checklist
    • Defined assessment outcomes
    • Completed compliance waiver process

    Phase 6

    Architectural Standards

    Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework

    Architectural Standards

    1. Current state of EA governance
    2. EA fundamentals
    3. Engagement model
    4. EA governing bodies
    5. EA policy
    6. Architectural standards
    7. Communication Plan

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify and standardize EA work products
    • Classify the architectural standards
    • Identify the custodian of standards
    • Update the standards

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Head of Enterprise Architecture
    • Enterprise Architects
    • Domain Architects
    • Solution Architects

    Outcomes of this step

    • A standardized set of EA work products
    • A way to categorize and store EA work products
    • A defined method of updating standards

    Info-Tech Insight

    The architecture standard is the currency that facilitates information exchange between stakeholders. The primary purpose is to minimize transaction costs by providing a balance between stability and relevancy.

    Phase 6 guided implementation

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 6: Architectural standards

    Proposed Time to Completion: 4 weeks

    Step 6.1: Understand Architectural Standards

    Start with an analyst kick-off call:

    • Discuss architectural standards.
    • Know how to identify and define EA work products.
    • Understand the standard content of work products.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Identify and standardize EA work products.

    Step 6.2–6.3: EA Repository and Updating the Standards

    Review with analyst:

    • Review the standardized EA work products.
    • Discuss the principles of EA repository.
    • Discuss the Info-Tech best-practice model for updating architecture standards and how to tailor them to your organizational context.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Build a folder structure for storing EA work products.
    • Use the Info-Tech best-practice architecture standards update process to develop your organization’s process for updating architecture standards.

    With these tools & templates:

    • Architecture Standards Update Process Template

    Recommended list of EA work products to standardize

    • EA work products listed below are typically produced as a part of the architecture lifecycle.
    • To ensure consistent development of architecture, the work products need to be standardized.
    • Consider standardizing both the naming conventions and the content of the work products.
    1. EA vision: A document containing the vision that provides the high-level aspiration of the capabilities and business value that EA will deliver.
    2. Statement of EA Work: The Statement of Architecture Work defines the scope and approach that will be used to complete an architecture project.
    3. Reference architectures: A reference architecture is a set of best-practice taxonomy that describes components and the conceptual structure of the model, as well as graphics, which provide a visual representation of the taxonomy to aid understanding. Reference architectures are created for each of the architecture domains.
    4. Solution proposal: The proposed project solution based on the EA guidelines and standards.
    5. Compliance assessment request: The document that contains the project solution architecture assessment details.
    6. Architecture change request: The request that initiates a change to architecture standards when existing standards can no longer meet the needs of the enterprise.
    7. Transition architecture: A transition architecture shows the enterprise at incremental states that reflect periods of transition that sit between the baseline and target architectures.
    8. Architectural roadmap: A roadmap that lists individual increments of change and lays them out on a timeline to show progression from the baseline architecture to the target architecture.
    9. EA compliance waiver request: A compliance waiver request that must be made when a solution or segment architecture is perceived to be non-compliant with the enterprise architecture.

    Standardize the content of each work product

    1. Purpose - The reason for the existence of the work product.
    2. Owner - The owner of this EA work product.
    3. Target Audience - The intended audience of the work product such as employees and partners.
    4. Naming Pattern - The pattern for the name of the work product as well as its file name.
    5. Table of Contents - The various sections of the work product.
    6. Review & Sign-Off Authority - The stakeholders who will review the work product and approve it.
    7. Repository Folder Location - The location where the work product will be stored.

    Identify and standardize work products

    6.1 3 hrs

    Input

    • List of various documents being produced by projects currently.

    Output

    • Standardized list of work products.

    Materials

    • A computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • A computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Instructions:

    Hold a working session with the participants to identify and standardize work products. Facilitate the activity using the steps below.

    1. Identifying EA work products:
      1. Start by reviewing the list of all architecture-related documents presently produced in the organization. Any such deliverable with the following characteristics can be standardized:
        1. If it can be broken out and made into a standalone document.
        2. If it can be made into a fill-in form completed by others.
        3. If it is repetitive and requires iterative changes.
      2. Create a list of work products that your organization would like to standardize based on the characteristics above.
    2. The content and format of standardized EA work products:
      1. For each work product your organization wishes to standardize, look at its purpose and brainstorm the content needed to fulfill that purpose.
      2. After identifying the elements that need to be included in the work product to fulfill its purpose, order them logically for presentation purposes.
      3. In each section of the work product that need to be completed, include instructions on how to complete the section.
      4. Review the seven elements presented in the previous slide and include them in the work products.

    EA repository - information taxonomy

    As the EA function begins to grow and accumulates EA work products, having a well-designed folder structure helps you find the necessary information efficiently.

    Architecture meta-model

    Describes the organizationally tailored architecture framework.

    Architecture capability

    Defines the parameters, structures, and processes that support the enterprise architecture group.

    Architecture landscape

    An architectural presentation of assets in use by the enterprise at particular points in time.

    Standards information base

    Captures the standards with which new architectures and deployed services must comply.

    Reference library

    Provides guidelines, templates, patterns, and other forms of reference material to accelerate the creation of new architectures for the enterprise.

    Governance log

    Provides a record of governance activity across the enterprise.

    Create repository folder structure

    6.2 5-6 hrs

    Input

    • List of standardized work products.

    Output

    • EA work products mapped to a repository folder.

    Materials

    • A computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, IT department leads.

    Instructions:

    Hold a working session with the participants to create a repository structure. Facilitate the activity using the steps below:

    1. Start with the taxonomy on the previous slide, and sort the existing work products into these six categories.
    2. Assess that the work products are sorted in a mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive fashion. This means that a certain work product that appears in one category should not appear in another category. As well, make sure these six categories capture all the existing work products.
    3. Based on the categorization of the work products, build a folder structure that follows these categories, which will allow for the work products to be accessed quickly and easily.

    Create a process to update EA work products

    • Architectural standards are not set in stone and should be reviewed and updated periodically.
    • The Architecture Review Board is the custodian for standards.
    • Any change to the standards need to be assessed thoroughly and must be communicated to all the impacted stakeholders.

    Architectural standards update process

    Identify

    • Identify changes to the standards

    Assess

    • Review and assess the impacts of the change

    Document

    • Document the change and update the standard

    Approve

    • Distribute the updated standards to key stakeholders for approval

    Communicate

    • Communicate the approved changes to impacted stakeholders

    Create a process to continually update standards

    6.3 1.5 hrs

    Input

    • The list of work products and its owners.

    Output

    • A documented work product update process.

    Materials

    • A computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, business line leads, IT department leads.

    The image shows the screenshot of the Table of Contents with the Standards Update Process highlighted.

    Step 1 - Facilitate

    Download the standards update process template and hold a working session to customize the best practice process to your organization’s needs.

    Download the Architecture Standards Update Process Template

    Step 2 - Summarize

    Summarize the objectives and the process flow in the EA governance framework document.

    Update the EA Governance Framework Template

    Create architectural standards to minimize transaction costs

    Case Study

    Industry Insurance

    Source Info-Tech

    Situation

    INSPRO01 didn’t maintain any centralized standards and each project had its own solution/design work products based on the preference of the architect on the project. This led to multiple standards across the organization.

    Lack of consistency in architectural deliverables made the information hand-offs expensive.

    Complication

    INSPRO01 didn’t maintain the architectural documents in a central repository and the information was scattered across multiple project folders.

    This caused key stakeholders to make decisions based on incomplete information and resulted in constant revisions as new information became available.

    Result

    Info-Tech recommended that the EA team identify and standardize the various EA work products so that information was collected in a consistent manner across the organization.

    The team also recommended an information taxonomy to store the architectural deliverables and other collateral.

    This resulted in increased consistency and standardization leading to efficiency gains.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    Key Activities

    • Identify and standardize EA work products.
    • Classify the architectural standards.
    • Identify the custodian of standards.
    • Update the standards.

    Outcomes

    • A standardized set of EA work products
    • A way to categorize and store EA work products
    • A defined method of updating standards

    Phase 7

    Communication Plan

    Create a Right-Sized Enterprise Architecture Governance Framework

    Communication Plan

    1. Current state of EA governance
    2. EA fundamentals
    3. Engagement model
    4. EA governing bodies
    5. EA policy
    6. Architectural standards
    7. Communication Plan

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • List the changes identified in the EA governance initiative
    • Identify stakeholders
    • Create a communication plan

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Head of Enterprise Architecture
    • Enterprise Architects
    • Domain Architects
    • Solution Architects

    Outcomes of this step

    • Communication Plan
    • EA Governance Framework

    Info-Tech Insight

    By failing to prepare, you are preparing to fail – maximize the likelihood of success for EA governance by engaging the relevant stakeholders and communicating the changes.

    Phase 7 guided implementation

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 6: Operationalize the EA governance framework

    Proposed Time to Completion: 1 week

    Step 7.1: Create a Communication Plan

    Start with an analyst kick-off call:

    • Discuss how to communicate changes to stakeholders.
    • Discuss the purposes and benefits of the EA governance framework.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Identify the stakeholders affected by the EA governance transformations.
    • List the benefits of the proposed EA governance initiative.
    • Create a plan to communicate the changes to impacted stakeholders.

    With these tools & templates:

    • EA Governance Communication Plan Template
    • EA Governance Framework Template

    Step 7.2: Review the Communication Plan

    Start with an analyst kick-off call:

    • Review the communication plan and gather feedback on the proposed stakeholders.
    • Confer about the various methods of communicating change in an organization.
    • Discuss the uses of the EA Governance Framework.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Refine your communication plan and use it to engage with stakeholders to better serve customers.
    • Create the EA Governance Framework to accompany the communication plan in engaging stakeholders to better understand the value of EA.

    With these tools & templates:

    • EA Governance Communication Plan Template
    • EA Governance Framework Template

    Communicate changes to stakeholders

    The changes made to the EA governance components need to be reviewed, approved, and communicated to all of the impacted stakeholders.

    Deliverables to be reviewed:

    • Fundamentals
      • Vision and Mission
      • Goals and Measures
      • Principles
    • Architecture review process
    • Assessment checklists
    • Policy Governing body charters
    • Architectural standards

    Deliverable Review Process:

    Step 1: Hold a meeting with stakeholders to review, refine, and agree on the changes.

    Step 2: Obtain an official approval from the stakeholders.

    Step 3: Communicate the changes to the impacted stakeholders.

    Communicate the changes by creating an EA governance framework and communication plan

    7.1 3 hrs

    Input

    • EA governance deliverables.

    Output

    • EA Governance Framework
    • Communication Plan.

    Materials

    • A computer, and/or a whiteboard and marker.

    Participants

    • EA team, CIO, business line leads, IT department leads.

    Instructions:

    Hold a working session with the participants to create the EA governance framework as well as the communication plan. Facilitate the activity using the steps below:

    1. EA Governance Framework:
      1. The EA Governance Framework is a document that will help reference and cite all the materials created from this blueprint. Follow the instructions on the framework to complete.
    2. Communication Plan:
      1. Identify the stakeholders based on the EA governance deliverables.
      2. For each stakeholder identified, complete the “Communication Matrix” section in the EA Governance Communication Plan Template. Fill out the section based on the instructions in the template.
      3. As the stakeholders are identified based on the “Communication Matrix,” use the EA Governance Framework document to communicate the changes.

    Download the EA Governance Communication Plan Template and EA Governance Framework Template for additional instructions and to document your activities in this phase.

    Maximize the likelihood of success by communicating changes

    Case Study

    Industry Insurance

    Source Info-Tech

    Situation

    The EA group followed Info-Tech’s methodology to assess the current state and has identified areas for improvement.

    Best practices were adopted to fill the gaps identified.

    The team planned to communicate the changes to the technology leadership team and get approvals.

    As the EA team tried to roll out changes, they encountered resistance from various IT teams.

    Complication

    The team was not sure of how to communicate the changes to the business stakeholders.

    Result

    Info-Tech has helped the team conduct a thorough stakeholder analysis to identify all the stakeholders who would be impacted by the changes to the architecture governance framework.

    A comprehensive communication plan was developed that leveraged traditional email blasts, town hall meetings, and non-traditional methods such as team blogs.

    The team executed the communication plan and was able to manage the change effectively.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    Key Activities

    • List the changes identified in the EA governance initiative.
    • Identify stakeholders.
    • Create a communication plan.
    • Compile the materials created in the blueprint to better communicate the value of EA governance.

    Outcomes

    • Communication plan
    • EA governance framework

    Bibliography

    Government of British Columbia. “Architecture and Standards Review Board.” Government of British Columbia. 2015. Web. Jan 2016. < http://www.cio.gov.bc.ca/cio/standards/asrb.page >

    Hopkins, Brian. “The Essential EA Toolkit Part 3 – An Architecture Governance Process.” Cio.com. Oct 2010. Web. April 2016. < http://www.cio.com/article/2372450/enterprise-architecture/the-essential-ea-toolkit-part-3---an-architecture-governance-process.html >

    Kantor, Bill. “How to Design a Successful RACI Project Plan.” CIO.com. May 2012. Web. Jan 2016. < http://www.cio.com/article/2395825/project-management/how-to-design-a-successful-raci-project-plan.html >

    Sapient. “MIT Enterprise Architecture Guide.” Sapient. Sep 2004. Web. Jan 2016. < http://web.mit.edu/itag/eag/FullEnterpriseArchitectureGuide0.1.pdf >

    TOGAF. “Chapter 41: Architecture Repository.” The Open Group. 2011. Web. Jan 2016. < http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/chap41.html >

    TOGAF. “Chapter 48: Architecture Compliance.” The Open Group. 2011. Web. Jan 2016. < http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/chap48.html >

    TOGAF. “Version 9.1.” The Open Group. 2011. Web. Jan 2016. http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/

    United States Secret Service. “Enterprise Architecture Review Board.” United States Secret Service. Web. Jan 2016. < http://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/toolkit/pdf/ID191.pdf >

    Virginia Information Technologies Agency. “Enterprise Architecture Policy.” Commonwealth of Virginia. Jul 2006. Web. Jan 2016. < https://www.vita.virginia.gov/uploadedfiles/vita_main_public/library/eapolicy200-00.pdf >

    Research contributors and experts

    Alan Mitchell, Senior Manager, Global Cities Centre of Excellence, KPMG

    Alan Mitchell has held numerous consulting positions before his role in Global Cities Centre of Excellence for KPMG. As a Consultant, he has had over 10 years of experience working with enterprise architecture related engagements. Further, he worked extensively with the public sector and prides himself on his knowledge of governance and how governance can generate value for an organization.

    Ian Gilmour, Associate Partner, EA advisory services, KPMG

    Ian Gilmour is the global lead for KPMG’s enterprise architecture method and Chief Architect for the KPMG Enterprise Reference Architecture for Health and Human Services. He has over 20 years of business design experience using enterprise architecture techniques. The key service areas that Ian focuses on are business architecture, IT-enabled business transformation, application portfolio rationalization, and the development of an enterprise architecture capability within client organizations.

    Djamel Djemaoun Hamidson, Senior Enterprise Architect, CBC/Radio-Canada

    Djamel Djemaoun is the Senior Enterprise Architect for CBC/Radio-Canada. He has over 15 years of Enterprise Architecture experience. Djamel’s areas of special include service-oriented architecture, enterprise architecture integration, business process management, business analytics, data modeling and analysis, and security and risk management.

    Sterling Bjorndahl, Director of Operations, eHealth Saskatchewan

    Sterling Bjorndahl is now the Action CIO for the Sun Country Regional Health Authority, and also assisting eHealth Saskatchewan grow its customer relationship management program. Sterling’s areas of expertise include IT strategy, enterprise architecture, ITIL, and business process management. He serves as the Chair on the Board of Directors for Gardiner Park Child Care.

    Huw Morgan, IT Research Executive, Enterprise Architect

    Huw Morgan has 10+ years experience as a Vice President or Chief Technology Officer in Canadian internet companies. As well, he possesses 20+ years experience in general IT management. Huw’s areas of expertise include enterprise architecture, integration, e-commerce, and business intelligence.

    Serge Parisien, Manager, Enterprise Architecture at Canada Mortgage Housing Corporation

    Serge Parisien is a seasoned IT leader with over 25 years of experience in the field of information technology governance and systems development in both the private and public sectors. His areas of expertise include enterprise architecture, strategy, and project management.

    Alex Coleman, Chief Information Officer at Saskatchewan Workers’ Compensation Board

    Alex Coleman is a strategic, innovative, and results-driven business leader with a proven track record of 20+ years’ experience planning, developing, and implementing global business and technology solutions across multiple industries in the private, public, and not-for-profit sectors. Alex’s expertise includes program management, integration, and project management.

    L.C. (Skip) Lumley , Student of Enterprise and Business Architecture

    Skip Lumley was formerly a Senior Principle at KPMG Canada. He is now post-career and spends his time helping move enterprise business architecture practices forward. His areas of expertise include enterprise architecture program implementation and public sector enterprise architecture business development.

    Additional contributors

    • Tim Gangwish, Enterprise Architect at Elavon
    • Darryl Garmon, Senior Vice President at Elavon
    • Steve Ranaghan, EMEIA business engagement at Fujitsu

    Rationalize Your Collaboration Tools

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}51|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 7.3/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: 10 Average Days Saved
    • member rating average days saved: After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve.
    • Parent Category Name: End-User Computing Applications
    • Parent Category Link: /end-user-computing-applications
    • Organizations collaboration toolsets are increasingly disordered and overburdened. Not only do organizations waste money by purchasing tools that overlap with their current toolset, but also employees’ productivity is destroyed by having to spend time switching between multiple tools.
    • Shadow IT is easier than ever. Without suitable onboarding and agreed-upon practices, employees will seek out their own solutions for collaboration. No transparency of what tools are being used means that information shared through shadow IT cannot be coordinated, monitored, or regulated effectively.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Best-of-breed approaches create more confusion than productivity. Collaboration toolsets should be as streamlined as possible.
    • Employee-led initiatives to implement new toolsets are more successful. Focus on what is a suitable fit for employees’ needs.
    • Strategizing toolsets enhances security. File transfers and communication through unmonitored, unapproved tools increases phishing and hacking risks.

    Impact and Result

    • Categorize your current collaboration toolset, identifying genuine overlaps and gaps in your collaboration capabilities.
    • Work through our best-practice recommendations to decide which redundant overlapping tools should be phased out.
    • Build business requirements to fill toolset gaps and create an adoption plan for onboarding new tools.
    • Create a collaboration strategy that documents collaboration capabilities, rationalizes them, and states which capability to use when.

    Rationalize Your Collaboration Tools Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out how to create a collaboration strategy that will improve employee efficiency and save the organization time and money.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Evaluate current toolset

    Identify and categorize current collaboration toolset usage to recognize unnecessary overlaps and legitimate gaps.

    • Rationalize Your Collaboration Tools – Phase 1: Evaluate Current Toolset
    • Identifying and Categorizing Shadow Collaboration Tools Survey
    • Overlaps and Gaps in Current Collaboration Toolset Template

    2. Strategize toolset overlaps

    Evaluate overlaps to determine which redundant tools should be phased out and explore best practices for how to do so.

    • Rationalize Your Collaboration Tools – Phase 2: Strategize Toolset Overlaps
    • Phase-Out Plan Gantt Chart Template
    • Phase-Out Plan Marketing Materials

    3. Fill toolset gaps

    Fill your collaboration toolset gaps with best-fit tools, build business requirements for those tools, and create an adoption plan for onboarding.

    • Rationalize Your Collaboration Tools – Phase 3: Fill Toolset Gaps
    • Adoption Plan Gantt Chart Template
    • Adoption Plan Marketing Materials
    • Collaboration Tools Business Requirements Document Template
    • Collaboration Platform Evaluation Tool
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Rationalize Your Collaboration Tools

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Categorize the Toolset

    The Purpose

    Create a collaboration vision.

    Acknowledge the current state of the collaboration toolset.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A clear framework to structure the collaboration strategy

    Activities

    1.1 Set the vision for the Collaboration Strategy.

    1.2 Identify your collaboration tools with use cases.

    1.3 Learn what collaboration tools are used and why, including shadow IT.

    1.4 Begin categorizing the toolset.

    Outputs

    Beginnings of the Collaboration Strategy

    At least five archetypical use cases, detailing the collaboration capabilities required for these cases

    Use cases updated with shadow IT currently used within the organization

    Overlaps and Gaps in Current Capabilities Toolset Template

    2 Strategize Overlaps

    The Purpose

    Identify redundant overlapping tools and develop a phase-out plan.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Communication and phase-out plans for redundant tools, streamlining the collaboration toolset.

    Activities

    2.1 Identify legitimate overlaps and gaps.

    2.2 Explore business and user strategies for identifying redundant tools.

    2.3 Create a Gantt chart and communication plan and outline post-phase-out strategies.

    Outputs

    Overlaps and Gaps in Current Capabilities Toolset Template

    A shortlist of redundant overlapping tools to be phased out

    Phase-out plan

    3 Build Business Requirements

    The Purpose

    Gather business requirements for finding best-fit tools to fill toolset gaps.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A business requirements document

    Activities

    3.1 Use SoftwareReviews and the Collaboration Platform Evaluation Tool to shortlist best-fit collaboration tool.

    3.2 Build SMART objectives and goals cascade.

    3.3 Walk through the Collaboration Tools Business Requirements Document Template.

    Outputs

    A shortlist of collaboration tools

    A list of SMART goals and a goals cascade

    Completed Business Requirements Document

    4 Create an Adoption Plan

    The Purpose

    Create an adoption plan for successfully onboarding new collaboration tools.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    An adoption plan

    Activities

    4.1 Fill out the Adoption Plan Gantt Chart Template.

    4.2 Create the communication plan.

    4.3 Explore best practices to socialize the new tools.

    Outputs

    Completed Gantt chart

    Adoption plan marketing materials

    Long-term strategy for engaging employees with onboarded tools

    Identify and Build the Data & Analytics Skills Your Organization Needs

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}301|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Data Management
    • Parent Category Link: /data-management

    The rapid technological evolution in platforms, processes, and applications is leading to gaps in the skills needed to manage and use data. Some common obstacles that could prevent you from identifying and building the data & analytics skills your organization needs include:

    • Lack of resources and knowledge to secure professionals with the right mix of D&A skills and right level of experience/skills
    • Lack of well-formulated and robust data strategy
    • Underestimation of the value of soft skills

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Skill deficiency is frequently stated as a roadblock to realizing corporate goals for data & analytics. Soft skills and technical skills are complementary, and data & analytics teams need a combination of both to perform effectively. Identify the essential skills and the gap with current skills that fit your organization’s data strategy to ensure the right skills are available at the right time and minimize pertinent risks.

    Impact and Result

    Follow Info-Tech's advice on the roles and skills needed to support your data & analytics strategic growth objectives and how to execute an actionable plan:

    • Define the skills required for each essential data & analytics role.
    • Identify the roles and skills gaps in alignment with your current data strategy.
    • Establish an action plan to close the gaps and reduce risks.

    Identify and Build the Data & Analytics Skills Your Organization Needs Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Identify and Build the Data & Analytics Skills Your Organization Needs Deck – Use this research to assist you in identifying and building roles and skills that are aligned with the organization’s data strategy.

    To generate business value from data, data leaders must first understand what skills are required to achieve these goals, identify the current skill gaps, and then develop skills development programs to enhance the relevant skills. Use Info-Tech's approach to identify and fill skill gaps to ensure you have the right skills at the right time.

    • Identify and Build the Data & Analytics Skills Your Organization Needs Storyboard

    2. Data & Analytics Skills Assessment and Planning Tool – Use this tool to help you identify the current and required level of competency for data & analytics skills, analyze gaps, and create an actionable plan.

    Start with skills and roles identified as the highest priority through a high-level maturity assessment. From there, use this tool to determine whether the organization’s data & analytics team has the key role, the right combination of skill sets, and the right level competency for each skill. Create an actionable plan to develop skills and fill gaps.

    • Data & Analytics Skills Assessment and Planning Tool
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Identify and Build the Data & Analytics Skills Your Organization Needs

    Blending soft skills with deep technical expertise is essential for building successful data & analytics teams.

    Analyst Perspective

    Blending soft skills with deep technical expertise is essential for building successful data & analytics teams.

    In today's changing environment, data & analytics (D&A) teams have become an essential component, and it is critical for organizations to understand the skill and talent makeup of their D&A workforce. Chief data & analytics officers (CDAOs) or other equivalent data leaders can train current data employees or hire proven talent and quickly address skills gaps.

    While developing technical skills is critical, soft skills are often left underdeveloped, yet lack of such skills is most likely why the data team would face difficulty moving beyond managing technology and into delivering business value.

    Follow Info-Tech's methodology to identify and address skills gaps in today's data workplace. Align D&A skills with your organization's data strategy to ensure that you always have the right skills at the right time.

    Ruyi Sun
    Research Specialist,
    Data & Analytics, and Enterprise Architecture
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    The rapid technological evolution in platforms, processes, and applications is leading to gaps in the skills needed to manage and use data. Some critical challenges organizations with skills deficiencies might face include:

    • Time loss due to delayed progress and reworking of initiatives
    • Poor implementation quality and low productivity
    • Reduced credibility of data leader and data initiatives

    Common Obstacles

    Some common obstacles that could prevent you from identifying and building the data and analytics (D&A) skills your organization needs are:

    • Lack of resources and knowledge to secure professionals with the right mixed D&A skills and the right experience/skill level
    • Lack of well-formulated and robust data strategy
    • Neglecting the value of soft skills and placing all your attention on technical skills

    Info-Tech's Approach

    Follow Info-Tech's guidance on the roles and skills required to support your D&A strategic growth objectives and how to execute an actionable plan:

    • Define skills required for each essential data and analytics role
    • Identify roles and skills gap in alignment with your current data strategy
    • Establish action plan to close the gaps and reduce risks

    Info-Tech Insight

    Skills gaps are a frequently named obstacle to realizing corporate goals for D&A. Soft skills and technical skills are complementary, and a D&A team needs both to perform effectively. Identify the essential skills and the gap with current skills required by your organization's data strategy to ensure the right skill is available at the right time and to minimize applicable risks.

    The rapidly changing environment is impacting the nature of work

    Scarcity of data & analytics (D&A) skills

    • Data is one of the most valuable organizational assets, and regardless of your industry, data remains the key to informed decision making. More than 75% of businesses are looking to adopt technologies like big data, cloud computing, and artificial intelligence (AI) in the next five years (World Economic Forum, 2023). As organizations pivot in response to industry disruptions and technological advancements, the nature of work is changing, and the demand for data expertise has grown.
    • Despite an increasing need for data expertise, organizations still have trouble securing D&A roles due to inadequate upskilling programs, limited understanding of the skills required, and more (EY, 2022). Notably, scarce D&A skills have been critical. More workers will need at least a base level of D&A skills to adequately perform their jobs.

    Stock image of a data storage center.

    Organizations struggle to remain competitive when skills gaps aren't addressed

    Organizations identify skills gaps as the key barriers preventing industry transformation:

    60% of organizations identify skills gaps as the key barriers preventing business transformation (World Economic Forum, 2023)

    43% of respondents agree the business area with the greatest need to address potential skills gaps is data analytics (McKinsey & Company, 2020)

    Most organizations are not ready to address potential role disruptions and close skills gaps:

    87% of surveyed companies say they currently experience skills gaps or expect them within a few years (McKinsey & Company, 2020)

    28% say their organizations make effective decisions on how to close skills gaps (McKinsey & Company, 2020)

    Neglecting soft skills development impedes CDOs/CDAOs from delivering value

    According to BearingPoint's CDO survey, cultural challenges and limited data literacy are the main roadblocks to a CDO's success. To drill further into the problem and understand the root causes of the two main challenges, conduct a root cause analysis (RCA) using the Five Whys technique.

    Bar Chart of 'Major Roadblocks to the Success of a CDO' with 'Limited data literacy' at the top.
    (Source: BearingPoint, 2020)

    Five Whys RCA

    Problem: Poor data literacy is the top challenge CDOs face when increasing the value of D&A. Why?

    • People that lack data literacy find it difficult to embrace and trust the organization's data insights. Why?
    • Data workers and the business team don't speak the same language. Why?
    • No shared data definition or knowledge is established. Over-extensive data facts do not drive business outcomes. Why?
    • Leaders fail to understand that data literacy is more than technical training, it is about encompassing all aspects of business, IT, and data. Why?
    • A lack of leadership skills prevents leaders from recognizing these connections and the data team needing to develop soft skills.

    Problem: Cultural challenge is one of the biggest obstacles to a CDO's success. Why?

    • Decisions are made from gut instinct instead of data-driven insights, thus affecting business performance. Why?
    • People within the organization do not believe that data drives operational excellence, so they resist change. Why?
    • Companies overestimate the organization's level of data literacy and data maturity. Why?
    • A lack of strategies in change management, continuous improvement & data literacy for data initiatives. Why?
    • A lack of expertise/leaders possessing these relevant soft skills (e.g. change management, etc.).

    As organizations strive to become more data-driven, most conversations around D&A emphasize hard skills. Soft skills like leadership and change management are equally crucial, and deficits there could be the root cause of the data team's inability to demonstrate improved business performance.

    Data cannot be fully leveraged without a cohesive data strategy

    Business strategy and data strategy are no longer separate entities.

    • For any chief data & analytics officer (CDAO) or equivalent data leader, a robust and comprehensive data strategy is the number one tool for generating measurable business value from data. Data leaders should understand what skills are required to achieve these goals, consider the current skills gap, and build development programs to help employees improve those skills.
    • Begin your skills development programs by ensuring you have a data strategy plan prepared. A data strategy should never be formulated independently from the business. Organizations with high data maturity will align such efforts to the needs of the business, making data a major part of the business strategy to achieve data centricity.
    • Refer to Info-Tech's Build a Robust and Comprehensive Data Strategy blueprint to ensure data can be leveraged as a strategic asset of the organization.

    Diagram of 'Data Strategy Maturity' with two arrangements of 'Data Strategy' and 'Business Strategy'. One is 'Aligned', the other is 'Data Centric.'

    Info-Tech Insight

    The process of achieving data centricity requires alignment between the data and business teams, and that requires soft skills.

    Follow Info-Tech's methodology to identify the roles and skills needed to execute a data strategy

    1. Define Key Roles and Skills

      Digital Leadership Skills, Soft Skills, Technical Skills
      Key Output
      • Defined essential competencies, responsibilities for some common data roles
    2. Uncover the Skills Gap

      Data Strategy Alignment, High-Level Data Maturity Assessment, Skills Gap Analysis
      Key Output
      • Data roles and skills aligned with your current data strategy
      • Identified current and target state of data skill sets
    3. Build an Actionable Plan

      Initiative Priority, Skills Growth Feasibility, Hiring Feasibility
      Key Output
      • Identified action plan to address the risk of data skills deficiency

    Info-Tech Insight

    Skills gaps are a frequently named obstacle to realizing corporate goals for D&A. Soft skills and technical skills are complementary, and a D&A team needs both to perform effectively. Identify the essential skills and the gap with current skills that fit your organization's data strategy to ensure the right skill is available at the right time and to minimize applicable risks.

    Research benefits

    Member benefits

    • Reduce time spent defining the target state of skill sets.
    • Gain ability to reassess the feasibility of execution on your data strategy, including resources and timeline.
    • Increase confidence in the data leader's ability to implement a successful skills development program that is aligned with the organization's data strategy, which correlates directly to successful business outcomes.

    Business benefits

    • Reduce time and cost spent hiring key data roles.
    • Increase chance of retaining high-quality data professionals.
    • Reduce time loss for delayed progress and rework of initiatives.
    • Optimize quality of data initiative implementation.
    • Improve data team productivity.

    Insight summary

    Overarching insight

    Skills gaps are a frequently named obstacle to realizing corporate goals for D&A. Soft skills and technical skills are complementary, and a D&A team needs both to perform effectively. Identify the essential skills and the gap with current skills that fit your organization's data strategy to ensure the right skill is available at the right time and to minimize applicable risks.

    Phase 1 insight

    Technological advancements will inevitably require new technical skills, but the most in-demand skills go beyond mastering the newest technologies. Soft skills are essential to data roles as the global workforce navigates the changes of the last few years.

    Phase 2 insight

    Understanding and knowing your organization's data maturity level is a prerequisite to assessing your current skill and determining where you must align in the future.

    Phase 3 insight

    One of the misconceptions that organizations have includes viewing skills development as a one-time effort. This leads to underinvestment in data team skills, risk of falling behind on technological changes, and failure to connect with business partners. Employees must learn to continuously adapt to the changing circumstances of D&A.

    While the program must be agile and dynamic to reflect technological improvements in the development of technical skills, the program should always be anchored in soft skills because data management is fundamentally about interaction, collaboration, and people.

    Tactical insight

    Seeking input and support across your business units can align stakeholders to focus on the right data analytics skills and build a data learning culture.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Guided Implementation

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is four to six calls over the course of two to three months.

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    Phase 3

    Call #1: Understand common data & analytics roles and skills, and your specific objectives and challenges. Call #2: Assess the current data maturity level and competency of skills set. Identify the skills gap. Call #3: Identify the relationship between current initiatives and capabilities. Initialize the corresponding roadmap for the data skills development program.

    Call #4: (follow-up call) Touching base to follow through and ensure that benefits have received.

    Identify and Build the Data & Analytics Skills Your Organization Needs

    Phase 1

    Define Key Roles and Skills

    Define Key Roles and Skills Uncover the Skills Gap Build an Actionable Plan

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • 1.1 Review D&A Skill & Role List in Data & Analytics Assessment and Planning Tool

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Data leads

    Key resources for your data strategy: People

    Having the right role is a key component for executing effective data strategy.

    D&A Common Roles

    • Data Steward
    • Data Custodian
    • Data Owner
    • Data Architect
    • Data Modeler
    • Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) Specialist
    • Database Administrator
    • Data Quality Analyst
    • Security Architect
    • Information Architect
    • System Architect
    • MDM Administrator
    • Data Scientist
    • Data Engineer
    • Data Pipeline Developer
    • Data Integration Architect
    • Business Intelligence Architect
    • Business Intelligence Analyst
    • ML Validator

    AI and ML Specialist is projected to be the fastest-growing occupation in the next five years (World Economic Forum, 2023).

    While tech roles take an average of 62 days to fill, hiring a senior data scientist takes 70.5 days (Workable, 2019). Start your recruitment cycle early for this demand.

    D&A Leader Roles

    • Chief Data Officer (CDO)/Chief Data & Analytics Officer (CDAO)
    • Data Governance Lead
    • Data Management Lead
    • Information Security Lead
    • Data Quality Lead
    • Data Product Manager
    • Master Data Manager
    • Content and Record Manager
    • Data Literacy Manager

    CDOs act as impactful change agents ensuring that the organization's data management disciplines are running effectively and meeting the business' data needs. Only 12.0% of the surveyed organizations reported having a CDO as of 2012. By 2022, this percentage had increased to 73.7% (NewVantage Partners, 2022).

    Sixty-five percent of respondents said lack of data literacy is the top challenge CDOs face today (BearingPoint, 2020). It has become imperative for companies to consider building a data literacy program which will require a dedicated data literacy team.

    Key resources for your data strategy: Skill sets

    Distinguish between the three skills categories.

    • Soft Skills

      Soft skills are described as power skills regarding how you work, such as teamwork, communication, and critical thinking.
    • Digital Leadership Skills

      Not everyone working in the D&A field is expected to perform advanced analytical tasks. To thrive in increasingly data-rich environments, however, every data worker, including leaders, requires a basic technological understanding and skill sets such as AI, data literacy, and data ethics. These are digital leadership skills.
    • Technical Skills

      Technical skills are the practical skills required to complete a specific task. For example, data scientists and data engineers require programming skills to handle and manage vast amounts of data.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Technological advancements will inevitably require new technical skills, but the most in-demand skills go beyond mastering the newest technologies. Soft skills are essential to data roles as the global workforce navigates the changes of the last few years.

    Soft skills aren't just nice to have

    They're a top asset in today's data workplace.

    Leadership

    • Data leaders with strong leadership abilities can influence the organization's strategic execution and direction, support data initiatives, and foster data cultures. Organizations that build and develop leadership potential are 4.2 times more likely to financially outperform those that do not (Udemy, 2022).

    Business Acumen

    • The process of deriving conclusions and insights from data is ultimately utilized to improve business decisions and solve business problems. Possessing business acumen helps provide the business context and perspectives for work within data analytics fields.

    Critical Thinking

    • Critical thinking allows data leaders at every level to objectively assess a problem before making judgment, consider all perspectives and opinions, and be able to make decisions knowing the ultimate impact on results.

    Analytical Thinking

    • Analytical thinking remains the most important skill for workers in 2023 (World Economic Forum, 2023). Data analytics expertise relies heavily on analytical thinking, which is the process of breaking information into basic principles to analyze and understand the logic and concepts.

    Design Thinking & Empathy

    • Design thinking skills help D&A professionals understand and prioritize the end-user experience to better inform results and assist the decision-making process. Organizations with high proficiency in design thinking are twice as likely to be high performing (McLean & Company, 2022).

    Learning Focused

    • The business and data analytics fields continue to evolve rapidly, and the skills, especially technical skills, must keep pace. Learning-focused D&A professionals continuously learn, expanding their knowledge and enhancing their techniques.

    Change Management

    • Change management is essential, especially for data leaders who act as change agents developing and enabling processes and who assist others with adjusting to changes with cultural and procedural factors. Organizations with high change management proficiency are 2.2 times more likely to be high performing (McLean & Company, 2022).

    Resilience

    • Being motivated and adaptable is essential when facing challenges and high-pressure situations. Organizations highly proficient in resilience are 1.8 times more likely to be high performing (McLean & Company, 2022).

    Managing Risk & Governance Mindset

    • Risk management ability is not limited to highly regulated institutions. All data workers must understand risks from the larger organizational perspective and have a holistic governance mindset while achieving their individual goals and making decisions.

    Continuous Improvement

    • Continuously collecting feedback and reflecting on it is the foundation of continuous improvement. To uncover and track the lessons learned and treat them as opportunities, data workers must be able to discover patterns and connections.

    Teamwork & Collaboration

    • Value delivery in a data-centric environment is a team effort, requiring collaboration across the business, IT, and data teams. D&A experts with strong collaborative abilities can successfully work with other teams to achieve shared objectives.

    Communication & Active Listening

    • This includes communicating with relevant stakeholders about timelines and expectations of data projects and associated technology and challenges, paying attention to data consumers, understanding their requirements and needs, and other areas of interest to the organization.

    Technical skills for everyday excellence

    Digital Leadership Skills

    • Technological Literacy
    • Data and AI Literacy
    • Cloud Computing Literacy
    • Data Ethics
    • Data Translation

    Data & Analytics Technical Competencies

    • Data Mining
    • Programming Languages (Python, SQL, R, etc.)
    • Data Analysis and Statistics
    • Computational and Algorithmic Thinking
    • AI/ML Skills (Deep Learning, Computer Vision, Natural Language Processing, etc.)
    • Data Visualization and Storytelling
    • Data Profiling
    • Data Modeling & Design
    • Data Pipeline (ETL/ELT) Design & Management
    • Database Design & Management
    • Data Warehouse/Data Lake Design & Management

    1.1 Review D&A Skill & Role List in the Data & Analytics Assessment and Planning Tool

    Sample of Tab 2 in the Data & Analytics Assessment and Planning Tool.

    Tab 2. Skill & Role List

    Objective: Review the library of skills and roles and customize them as needed to align with your organization's language and specific needs.

    Download the Data & Analytics Assessment and Planning Tool

    Identify and Build the Data & Analytics Skills Your Organization Needs

    Phase 2

    Uncover the Skills Gap

    Define Key Roles and Skills Uncover the Skills Gap Build an Actionable Plan

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • 2.1 High-level assessment of your present data management maturity
    • 2.2 Interview business and data leaders to clarify current skills availability
    • 2.3 Use the Data & Analytics Assessment and Planning Tool to Identify your skills gaps

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Data leads
    • Business leads and subject matter experts (SMEs)
    • Key business stakeholders

    Identify skills gaps across the organization

    Gaps are not just about assigning people to a role, but whether people have the right skill sets to carry out tasks.

    • Now that you have identified the essential skills and roles in the data workplace, move to Phase 2. This phase will help you understand the required level of competency, assess where the organization stands today, and identify gaps to close.
    • Using the Data & Analytics Assessment and Planning Tool, start with areas that are given the highest priority through a high-level maturity assessment. From there, three levels of gaps will be found: whether people are assigned to a particular position, the right combination of D&A skill sets, and the right competency level for each skill.
    • Lack of talent assigned to a position

    • Lack of the right combination of D&A skill sets

    • Lack of appropriate competency level

    Info-Tech Insight

    Understanding your organization's data maturity level is a prerequisite to assessing the skill sets you have today and determining where you need to align in the future.

    2.1 High-level assessment of your present data management maturity

    Identifying and fixing skills gaps takes time, money, and effort. Focus on bridging the gap in high-priority areas.

    Input: Current state capabilities, Use cases (if applicable), Data culture diagnostic survey results (if applicable)
    Output: High-level maturity assessment, Prioritized list of data management focused area
    Materials: Data Management Assessment and Planning Tool (optional), Data & Analytics Assessment and Planning Tool
    Participants: Data leads, Business leads and subject matter experts (SMEs), Key business stakeholders

    Objectives:

    Prioritize these skills and roles based on your current maturity levels and what you intend to accomplish with your data strategy.

    Steps:

    1. (Optional Step) Refer to the Build a Robust and Comprehensive Data Strategy blueprint. You can assess your data maturity level using the following frameworks and methods:
      • Review current data strategy and craft use cases that represent high-value areas that must be addressed for their teams or functions.
      • Use the data culture assessment survey to determine your organization's data maturity level.
    2. (Optional Step) Refer to the Create a Data Management Roadmap blueprint and Data Management Assessment and Planning Tool to dive deep into understanding and assessing capabilities and maturity levels of your organization's data management enablers and understanding your priority areas and specific gaps.
    3. If you have completed Data Management Assessment and Planning Tool, fill out your maturity level scores for each of the data management practices within it - Tab 3 (Current-State Assessment). Skip Tab 4 (High-Level Maturity Assessment).
    4. If you have not yet completed Data Management Assessment and Planning Tool, skip Tab 3 and continue with Tab 4. Assign values 1 to 3 for each capability and enabler.
    5. You can examine your current-state data maturity from a high level in terms of low/mid/high maturity using either Tabs 3 or 4.
    6. Suggested focus areas along the data journey:
      • Low Maturity = Data Strategy, Data Governance, Data Architecture
      • Mid Maturity = Data Literacy, Information Management, BI and Reporting, Data Operations Management, Data Quality Management, Data Security/Risk Management
      • High Maturity = MDM, Data Integration, Data Product and Services, Advanced Analytics (ML & AI Management).

    Download the Data & Analytics Assessment and Planning Tool

    2.2 Interview business and data leaders to clarify current skills availability

    1-2 hours per interview

    Input: Sample questions targeting the activities, challenges, and opportunities of each unit
    Output: Identified skills availability
    Materials: Whiteboard/Flip charts, Data & Analytics Assessment and Planning Tool
    Participants: Data leads, Business leads and subject matter experts (SMEs), Key business stakeholders

    Instruction:

    1. Conduct a deep-dive interview with each key data initiative stakeholder (data owners, SMEs, and relevant IT/Business department leads) who can provide insights on the skill sets of their team members, soliciting feedback from business and data leaders about skills and observations of employees as they perform their daily tasks.
    2. Populate a current level of competency for each skill in the Data & Analytics Assessment and Planning Tool in Tabs 5 and 6. Having determined your data maturity level, start with the prioritized data management components (e.g. if your organization sits at low data maturity level, start with identifying relevant positions and skills under data governance, data architecture, and data architecture elements).
    3. More detailed instructions on how to utilize the workbook are at the next activity.

    Key interview questions that will help you :

    1. Do you have personnel assigned to the role? What are their primary activities? Do the personnel possess the soft and technical skills noted in the workbook? Are you satisfied with their performance? How would you evaluate their degree of competency on a scale of "vital, important, nice to have, or none"? The following aspects should be considered when making the evaluation:
      • Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): Business unit data will show where the organization is challenged and will help identify potential areas for development.
      • Project Management Office: Look at successful and failed projects for trends in team traits and competencies.
      • Performance Reviews: Look for common themes where employees excel or need to improve.
      • Focus Groups: Speak with a cross section of employees to understand their challenges.
    2. What technology is currently used? Are there requirements for new technology to be bought and/or optimized in the future? Will the workforce need to increase their skill level to carry out these activities with the new technology in place?

    Download the Data & Analytics Assessment and Planning Tool

    2.3 Use the Data & Analytics Assessment and Planning Tool to identify skills gaps

    1-3 hours — Not everyone needs the same skill levels.

    Input: Current skills competency, Stakeholder interview results and findings
    Output: Gap identification and analysis
    Materials: Data & Analytics Assessment and Planning Tool
    Participants: Data leads

    Instruction:

    1. Select your organization's data maturity level in terms of Low/Mid/High in cell A6 for both Tab 5 (Soft Skills Assessment) and Tab 6 (Technical Skills Assessment) to reduce irrelevant rows.
    2. Bring together key business stakeholders (data owners, SMEs, and relevant IT custodians) to determine whether the data role exists in the organization. If yes, assign a current-state value from “vital, important, nice to have, or none” for each skill in the assessment tool. Info-Tech has specified the desired/required target state of each skill set.
    3. Once you've assigned the current-state values, the tool will automatically determine whether there is a gap in skill set.

    Download the Data & Analytics Assessment and Planning Tool

    Identify and Build the Data & Analytics Skills Your Organization Needs

    Phase 3

    Build an Actionable Plan

    Define Key Roles and Skills Uncover the Skills Gap Build an Actionable Plan

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • 3.1 Use the Data & Analytics Assessment and Planning Tool to build your actionable roadmap

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Data leads
    • Business leads and subject matter experts (SMEs)
    • Key business stakeholders

    Determine next steps and decision points

    There are three types of internal skills development strategies

    • There are three types of internal skills development strategies organizations can use to ensure the right people with the right abilities are placed in the right roles: reskill, upskill, and new hire.
    1. Reskill

      Reskilling involves learning new skills for a different or newly defined position.
    2. Upskill

      Upskilling involves building a higher level of competency in skills to improve the worker's performance in their current role.
    3. New hire

      New hire involves hiring workers who have the essential skills to fill the open position.

    Info-Tech Insight

    One of the misconceptions that organizations have includes viewing skills development as a one-time effort. This leads to underinvestment in data team skills, risk of falling behind on technological changes, and failure to connect with business partners. Employees must learn to continuously adapt to the changing circumstances of D&A. While the program must be agile and dynamic to reflect technological improvements in the development of technical skills, the program should always be anchored in soft skills because data management is fundamentally about interaction, collaboration, and people.

    How to determine when to upskill, reskill, or hire to meet your skills needs

    Reskill

    Reskilling often indicates a change in someone's career path, so this decision requires a goal aligned with both individuals and the organization to establish a mutually beneficial situation.

    When making reskilling decisions, organizations should also consider the relevance of the skill for different positions. For example, data administrators and data architects have similar skill sets, so reskilling is appropriate for these employees.

    Upskill

    Upskilling tends to focus more on the soft skills necessary for more advanced positions. A data strategy lead, for example, might require design thinking training, which enables leaders to think from different perspectives.

    Skill growth feasibility must also be considered. Some technical skills, particularly those involving cutting-edge technologies, require continual learning to maintain operational excellence. For example, a data scientist may require AI/ML skills training to incorporate use of modern automation technology.

    New Hire

    For open positions and skills that are too resource-intensive to reskill or upskill, it makes sense to recruit new employees. Consider, however, time and cost feasibility of hiring. Some positions (e.g. senior data scientist) take longer to fill. To minimize risks, coordinate with your HR department and begin recruiting early.

    Data & Analytics skills training

    There are various learning methods that help employees develop priority competencies to achieve reskilling or upskilling.

    Specific training

    The data team can collaborate with the human resources department to plan and develop internal training sessions aimed at specific skill sets.

    This can also be accomplished through external training providers such as DCAM, which provides training courses on data management and analytics topics.

    Formal education program

    Colleges and universities can equip students with data analytics skills through formal education programs such as MBAs and undergraduate or graduate degrees in Data Science, Machine Learning, and other fields.

    Certification

    Investing time and effort to obtain certifications in the data & analytics field allows data workers to develop skills and gain recognition for continuous learning and self-improvement.

    AWS Data Analytics and Tableau Data Scientist Certification are two popular data analytics certifications.

    Online learning from general providers

    Some companies offer online courses in various subjects. Coursera and DataCamp are two examples of popular providers.

    Partner with a vendor

    The organization can partner with a vendor who brings skills and talents that are not yet available within the organization. Employees can benefit from the collaboration process by familiarizing themselves with the project and enhancing their own skills.

    Support from within your business

    The data team can engage with other departments that have previously done skills development programs, such as Finance and Change & Communications, who may have relevant resources to help you improve your business acumen and change management skills.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Seeking input and support across your business units can align stakeholders to focus on the right data analytics skills and build a data learning culture.

    Data & Analytics skills reinforcement

    Don't assume learners will immediately comprehend new knowledge. Use different methods and approaches to reinforce their development.

    Innovation Space

    • Skills development is not a one-time event, but a continuous process during which innovation should be encouraged. A key aspect of being innovative is having a “fail fast” mentality, which means collecting feedback, recognizing when something isn't working, encouraging experimentation, and taking a different approach with the goal of achieving operational excellence.
    • Human-centered design (HCD) also yields innovative outcomes with a people-first focus. When creating skills development programs for various target groups, organizations should integrate a human-centered approach.

    Commercial Lens

    • Exposing people to a commercial way of thinking can add long-term value by educating people to act in the business' best interest and raising awareness of what other business functions contribute. This includes concepts such as project management, return on investment (ROI), budget alignment, etc.

    Checklists/Rubrics

    • Employees should record what they learn so they can take the time to reflect. A checklist is an effective technique for establishing objectives, allowing measurement of skills development and progress.

    Buddy Program

    • A buddy program helps employees gain and reinforce knowledge and skills they have learned through mutual support and information exchange.

    Align HR programs to support skills integration and talent recruitment

    With a clear idea of skills needs and an executable strategy for training and reinforcing of concepts, HR programs and processes can help the data team foster a learning environment and establish a recruitment plan. The links below will direct you to blueprints produced by McLean & Company, a division of Info-Tech Research Group.

    Workforce Planning

    When integrating the skills of the future into workforce planning, determine the best approach for addressing the identified talent gaps – whether to build, buy, or borrow.

    Integrate the future skills identified into the organization's workforce plan.

    Talent Acquisition

    In cases where employee development is not feasible, the organization's talent acquisition strategy must focus more on buying or borrowing talent. This will impact the TA process. For example, sourcing and screening must be updated to reflect new approaches and skills.

    If you have a talent acquisition strategy, assess how to integrate the new roles/skills into recruiting.

    Competencies/Succession Planning

    Review current organizational core competencies to determine if they need to be modified. New skills will help inform critical roles and competencies required in succession talent pools.

    If no competency framework exists, use McLean & Company's Develop a Comprehensive Competency Framework blueprint.

    Compensation

    Evaluate modified and new roles against the organization's compensation structure. Adjust them as necessary. Look at market data to understand compensation for new roles and skills.

    Reassess your base pay structure according to market data for new roles and skills.

    Learning and Development

    L&D plays a huge role in closing the skills gap. Build L&D opportunities to support development of new skills in employees.

    Design an Impactful Employee Development Program to build the skills employees need in the future.

    3.1 Use the Data & Analytics Assessment and Planning Tool to build an actionable plan

    1-3 hours

    Input: Roles and skills required, Key decision points
    Output: Actionable plan
    Materials: Data & Analytics Assessment and Planning Tool
    Participants: Data leads, Business leads and subject matter experts (SMEs), Key business stakeholders

    Instruction:

    1. On Tab 7 (Next Steps & Decision Points), you will find a list of tasks that correspond to roles that where there is a skills gap.
    2. Customize this list of tasks initiatives according to your needs.
    3. The Gantt chart, which will be generated automatically after assigning start and finish dates for each activity, can be used to structure your plan and guarantee that all the main components of skills development are addressed.

    Sample of Tab 7 in the Data & Analytics Assessment and Planning Tool.

    Download the Data & Analytics Assessment and Planning Tool

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Sample of the Create a Data Management Roadmap blueprint.

    Create a Data Management Roadmap

    • This blueprint will help you design a data management practice that will allow your organization to use data as a strategic enabler.

    Stock image of a person looking at data dashboards on a tablet.

    Build a Robust and Comprehensive Data Strategy

    • Put a strategy in place to ensure data is available, accessible, well-integrated, secured, of acceptable quality, and suitably visualized to fuel organization-wide decision making. Start treating data as strategic and corporate asset.

    Sample of the Foster Data-Driven Culture With Data Literacy blueprint.

    Foster Data-Driven Culture With Data Literacy

    • By thoughtfully designing a data literacy training program appropriate to the audience's experience, maturity level, and learning style, organizations build a data-driven and engaged culture that helps them unlock their data's full potential and outperform other organizations.

    Research Authors and Contributors

    Authors:

    Name Position Company
    Ruyi Sun Research Specialist Info-Tech Research Group

    Contributors:

    Name Position Company
    Steve Wills Practice Lead Info-Tech Research Group
    Andrea Malick Advisory Director Info-Tech Research Group
    Annabel Lui Principal Advisory Director Info-Tech Research Group
    Sherwick Min Technical Counselor Info-Tech Research Group

    Bibliography

    2022 Workplace Learning Trends Report.” Udemy, 2022. Accessed 20 June 2023.

    Agrawal, Sapana, et al. “Beyond hiring: How companies are reskilling to address talent gaps.” McKinsey & Company, 12 Feb. 2020. Accessed 20 June 2023.

    Bika, Nikoletta. “Key hiring metrics: Useful benchmarks for tech roles.” Workable, 2019. Accessed 20 June 2023.

    Chroust, Tomas. “Chief Data Officer – Leaders of data-driven enterprises.” BearingPoint, 2020. Accessed 20 June 2023.

    “Data and AI Leadership Executive Survey 2022.” NewVantage Partners, Jan 2022. Accessed 20 June 2023.

    Dondi, Marco, et al. “Defining the skills citizens will need in the future world of work.” McKinsey & Company, June 2021. Accessed 20 June 2023.

    Futschek, Gerald. “Algorithmic Thinking: The Key for Understanding Computer Science.” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4226, 2006.

    Howard, William, et al. “2022 HR Trends Report.” McLean & Company, 2022. Accessed 20 June 2023.

    “Future of Jobs Report 2023.” World Economic Forum, May 2023. Accessed 20 June 2023.

    Knight, Michelle. “What is Data Ethics?” Dataversity, 19 May 2021. Accessed 20 June 2023.

    Little, Jim, et al. “The CIO Imperative: Is your technology moving fast enough to realize your ambitions?” EY, 22 Apr. 2022. Accessed 20 June 2023.

    “MDM Roles and Responsibilities.” Profisee, April 2019. Accessed 20 June 2023.

    “Reskilling and Upskilling: A Strategic Response to Changing Skill Demands.” TalentGuard, Oct. 2019. Accessed 20 June 2023.

    Southekal, Prashanth. “The Five C's: Soft Skills That Every Data Analytics Professional Should Have.” Forbes, 17 Oct. 2022. Accessed 20 June 2023.

    Implement an IT Employee Development Plan

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}592|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: 5 Average Days Saved
    • member rating average days saved: After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve.
    • Parent Category Name: Train & Develop
    • Parent Category Link: /train-and-develop
    • There is a growing gap between the competencies organizations have been focused on developing and what is needed in the future.
    • Employees have been left to drive their own development with little direction or support and without the alignment of development to organizational needs.
    • The pace of change in today’s environment demands new competencies while making others obsolete, and IT is challenged with keeping up with upskilling employees.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Organizations position development as employee-owned, yet employees still feel like their needs aren’t being met, and many leave as a result.
    • Development needs to be employee-owned and manager-supported but also organization-informed to ensure that it meets the organization’s needs.
    • Today, operating environments change quickly, and organizations need to develop the competencies employees need both today and in the future.

    Impact and Result

    • Design employee development plans that build the competencies the organization and IT department need both today and in the future.
    • Equip managers and build program support to foster continuous learning and development.
    • Connect the right development opportunity to the right employee through an effective development planning process.

    Implement an IT Employee Development Plan Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should implement effective development planning, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Assess employees' development needs

    Assist your employees in setting appropriate development goals.

    • Implement Effective Employee Development Planning – Phase 1: Assess Employees' Development Needs
    • IT Manager Job Aid: Employee Development
    • IT Employee Job Aid: Employee Development
    • IT Employee Career Development Workbook
    • Individual Competency Development Plan
    • IT Competency Library
    • Leadership Competencies Workbook

    2. Select appropriate activities for development

    Review existing and identify new development activities that employees can undertake to achieve their goals.

    • Implement Effective Employee Development Planning – Phase 2: Select Activities for Developing Prioritized Competencies
    • Learning Methods Catalog for IT Employees

    3. Build manager coaching skills

    Establish manager and employee follow-up accountabilities.

    • Implement Effective Employee Development Planning – Phase 3: Build Manager Coaching Skills to Support Employee Development
    • Role Play Coaching Scenarios
    [infographic]

    Build an Application Department Strategy

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}180|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.2/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $220,866 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 34 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Architecture & Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /architecture-and-strategy
    • Application delivery has modernized. There are increasing expectations on departments to deliver on organizational and product objectives with increasing velocity.
    • Application departments produce many diverse, divergent products, applications, and services with expectations of frequent updates and changes based on rapidly changing landscapes

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • There is no such thing as a universal “applications department.” Unlike other domains of IT, there are no widely accepted frameworks that clearly outline universal best practices of application delivery and management.
    • Different software needs and delivery orientations demand a tailored structure and set of processes, especially when managing a mixed portfolio or multiple delivery methods.

    Impact and Result

    Understand what your department’s purpose is through articulating its strategy in three steps:

    • Determining your application department’s values, principles, and orientation.
    • Laying out the goals, objectives, metrics, and priorities of the department.
    • Building a communication plan to communicate your overall department strategy.

    Build an Application Department Strategy Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should build an application department strategy, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Take stock of who you are

    Consider and record your department’s values, principles, orientation, and capabilities.

    • Build an Application Department Strategy – Phase 1: Take Stock of Who You Are
    • Application Department Strategy Supporting Workbook

    2. Articulate your strategy

    Define your department’s strategy through your understanding of your department combined with everything that you do and are working to do.

    • Build an Application Department Strategy – Phase 2: Articulate Your Strategy
    • Application Department Strategy Template

    3. Communicate your strategy

    Communicate your department’s strategy to your key stakeholders.

    • Build an Application Department Strategy – Phase 3: Communicate Your Strategy

    Infographic

    Workshop: Build an Application Department Strategy

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Take Stock of Who You Are

    The Purpose

    Understand what makes up your application department beyond the applications and services provided.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Articulating your guiding principles, values, capabilities, and orientation provides a foundation for expressing your department strategy.

    Activities

    1.1 Identify your team’s values and guiding principles.

    1.2 Define your department’s orientation.

    Outputs

    A summary of your department’s values and guiding principles

    A clear view of your department’s orientation and supporting capabilities

    2 Articulate Your Strategy

    The Purpose

    Lay out all the details that make up your application department strategy.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A completed application department strategy canvas containing everything you need to communicate your strategy.

    Activities

    2.1 Write your application department vision statement.

    2.2 Define your application department goals and metrics.

    2.3 Specify your department capabilities and orientation.

    2.4 Prioritize what is most important to your department.

    Outputs

    Your department vision

    Your department’s goals and metrics that contribute to achieving your department’s vision

    Your department’s capabilities and orientation

    A prioritized roadmap for your department

    3 Communicate Your Strategy

    The Purpose

    Lay out your strategy’s communication plan.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Your application department strategy presentation ready to be presented to your stakeholders.

    Activities

    3.1 Identify your stakeholders.

    3.2 Develop a communication plan.

    3.3 Wrap-up and next steps

    Outputs

    List of prioritized stakeholders you want to communicate with

    A plan for what to communicate to each stakeholder

    Communication is only the first step – what comes next?

    Master the MSA for Your Managed Services Providers

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}235|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.7/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $9,869 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 4 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Vendor Management
    • Parent Category Link: /vendor-management
    • Master Services Agreements and Service Level Agreements are tedious, and reviewers may lack the skills and experience to effectively complete the process.
    • Managed services providers have a repository of contract terms and conditions that are road-tested and prepackaged, and which are often biased in their favor.
    • With many different pricing options, it is difficult to choose the services you need.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Manage your managed services providers. Added value is realized when managed service providers are in tune with your IT strategies, goals, and mission.
    • Negotiate an agreement that is beneficial to both parties. The most successful partnerships are a win-win agreement.
    • Lawyers can’t ensure you get the best business deal. They tend to look at general terms and conditions and may overlook IT-specific components.

    Impact and Result

    • Understanding managed services providers, including their roles and pricing models, will give you valuable insight into negotiating the best deal for your organization.
    • Info-Tech’s contract review methodology will help you navigate the complex process of managed services provider contract evaluation and review all the key details to maximize the benefits to your organization.
    • This blueprint provides guidance on catching vendor-biased terms and conditions, and suggests tips for getting managed services providers to take on their fair share of responsibilities.

    Master the MSA for Your Managed Services Providers Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should master the MSA for your MSPs, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Review terms and conditions for your MSP contract

    Use Info-Tech’s MSA Contract Review Tool to locate and track improvement areas in your MSAs.

    • Master the MSA for Your Managed Services Providers – Phase 1: Review Terms and Conditions of Your MSP Contract
    • MSA Contract Review Tool
    [infographic]

    Achieve IT Spend & Staffing Transparency

    • IT spend has increased in volume and complexity, but how IT spend decisions are made has not kept pace.
    • In most organizations, technology has evolved faster than the business’ understanding of what it is, how it works, and what it can do for them.
    • How traditional financial accounting methods are applied to IT expenditure don’t align well to modern IT realities.
    • IT is often directed to make cuts when cost optimization and targeted investment are what’s really needed to sustain and grow the organization in the long term.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Meaningful conversations about IT spend don’t happen nearly as frequently as they should. When they do happen, they are often inhibited by a lack of IT financial management (ITFM) maturity combined with the absence of a shared vocabulary between IT, the CFO, and other business function leaders.
    • Supporting data about actual technology spend taking place that would inform decision making is often scattered and incomplete.
    • Creating transparency in your IT financial data is essential to powering collaborative and informed technology spend decisions.

    Impact and Result

    • Understand the uses and benefits of making your IT spend more transparent.
    • Discover and organize your IT financial data.
    • Map your organization’s total technology spend against four IT stakeholder views: CFO, CIO, CXO, and CEO.
    • Gain vocabulary and facts that will help you tell the true story of IT spend.

    Members may also be interested in Info-Tech's IT Spend & Staffing Benchmarking Service.

    Achieve IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Achieve IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Deck – A detailed, do-it-yourself framework and process for clearly mapping your organization’s total technology spend.

    This deck mirrors Info-Tech’s own internal methods for delivering its IT Spend & Staffing Benchmarking Service in a do-it-yourself format. Based on Info-Tech’s proven ITFM Cost Model, it includes an IT spend mapping readiness assessment, expert advice for sourcing and organizing your financial data, a methodology for mapping IT staff and vendor spend according to four key stakeholder views (CFO, CIO, CXO, and CEO), and guidance on how to analyze and share your results.

    • Achieve IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Storyboard

    2. IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook – A structured Excel tool that allows you to allocate your IT spend across four key stakeholder views and generate high-impact visualizations.

    This workbook offers a step-by-step approach for mapping and visualizing your organization’s true IT spend.

    • IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook

    3. IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Executive Presentation Template – A PowerPoint template that helps you summarize and showcase key results from your IT spend transparency exercise.

    This presentation template offers a recommended structure for introducing key executive stakeholders to your organization’s true IT spending behavior and IT financial management as a whole.

    • IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Executive Presentation Template

    Infographic

    Further reading

    Achieve IT Spend & Staffing Transparency

    Lay a foundation for meaningful conversations with the business.

    Analyst Perspective

    Take the first step in your IT spend journey.

    Talking about money is hard. Talking to the CEO, CFO, and other business leaders about money is even harder, especially if IT is seen as just a cost center, is not understood by stakeholders, or is simply taken for granted. In times of economic hardship, already lean IT operations are tasked with becoming even leaner.

    When there's little fat to trim, making IT spend decisions without understanding the spend's origin, location, extent, and purpose can lead to mistakes that weaken, not strengthen, the organization.

    The first step in optimizing IT spend decisions is setting a baseline. This means having a comprehensive and transparent view of all technology spend, organization-wide. This baseline is the only way to have meaningful, data-driven conversations with stakeholders and approvers around what IT delivers to the business and the implications of making changes to IT funding.

    Before stepping forward in your IT financial management journey, know exactly where you're standing today.

    Jennifer Perrier, Principal Research Director, ITFM Practice

    Jennifer Perrier
    Principal Research Director, ITFM Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge Common Obstacles Info-Tech's Approach
    IT spend has increased in volume and complexity, but how IT spend decisions are made has not kept pace:
    • Technology has evolved faster than the business' understanding of what it is, how it works, and what it can do for them.
    • How traditional financial accounting methods are applied doesn't align well to modern IT realities.
    • IT is directed to make cuts when cost optimization and targeted investment are what's really needed to sustain and grow the organization in the long-term.
    Meaningful conversations about IT spend don't happen nearly as much as they should. This is often due to:
    • A lack of maturity in how ITFM (IT financial management) is executed within IT and across the organization as a whole.
    • The absence of a shared vocabulary between IT, the CFO, and other business function leaders.
    • Scattered and incomplete data about the actual technology spend taking place in the organization.
    Lay a foundation for meaningful conversations and informed decision-making around IT spend.
    • Understand the uses and benefits of making your IT spend more transparent.
    • Discover and organize your IT financial data.
    • Map your organization's total technology spend against four IT stakeholder views: CFO, CIO, CXO, and CEO.
    • Gain both vocabulary and facts that will help you tell the true story of IT spend.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Create transparency in your IT financial data to power both collaborative and informed technology spend decisions.

    IT spend has grown alongside IT complexity

    IT spend has grown alongside IT complexity

    Growth creates change ... and challenges

    IT has become more integral to business operations and achievement of strategic goals, driving complexity in how IT funds are allocated and managed.

    How IT funds are spent has changed
    Value demonstration is two-pronged. The first is return on performance investment, focused on formal and objective goals, metrics, and KPIs. The second is stakeholder satisfaction, a more subjective measure driven by IT-business alignment and relationship. IT leaders must do both well to prove and promote IT's value.
    Funding decision cadence has sped up
    Many organizations have moved from three- to five-year strategic planning cycles to one-year planning horizons or less, most noticeably since the 2008/2009 recession. Not only has the pace of technological change accelerated, but so too has volatility in the broader business and economic environments, forcing rapid response.
    Justification rigor around IT spend has increased
    The need for formal business cases, proposals, and participation in formal governance processes has increased, as has demand for financial transparency. With many IT departments still reporting into the CFO, there's no getting around it - today's IT leaders need to possess financial management savvy.
    Clearly showing business value has become priority
    IT spend has moved from the purchase of discrete hardware and software tools traditionally associated with IT to the need to address larger-scale issues around interoperability, integration, and virtualized cloud solutions. Today's focus is more on big-picture architecture than on day-to-day operations.

    ITFM capabilities haven't grown with IT spend

    IT still needs to prove itself.

    Increased integration with the core business has made it a priority for the head of IT to be well-versed in business language and practice, specifically in the areas of measurement and financial management.

    However, IT staff across all industries aren't very confident in how well IT is doing in managing its finances via three core processes:

    • Accounting of costs and budgets.
    • Optimizing costs to gain the best return on investment.
    • Demonstrating IT's value to the business.

    Recent data from 4,137 respondents to Info-Tech's IT Management & Governance Diagnostic shows that while most IT staff feel that these three financial management processes are important, notably fewer feel that IT management is effective at executing them.

    IT leadership's capabilities around fundamental cost data capture appear to be lagging, not to mention the essential value-added capabilities around optimizing costs and showing how IT contributes to business value.

    Graph of Cost and Budget Management

    Graph of Cost Optimization

    Questions for support transition

    Source: IT Management & Governance Diagnostic, Info-Tech Research Group, 2022.

    Take the perspective of key IT stakeholders as a first step in ITFM capability improvement

    Other business unit leaders need to deliver on their own specific and unique accountabilities. Create true IT spend transparency by accounting for these multiple perspectives.

    Exactly how is IT spending all that money we give them?
    Many IT costs, like back-end infrastructure and apps maintenance, can be invisible to the business.

    Why doesn't my department get more support from IT?
    Some business needs won't align with spend priorities, while others seem to take more than their fair share.

    Does the amount we spend on each IT service make sense?
    IT will get little done or fall short of meeting service level requirements without appropriate funding.

    I know what IT costs us, but what is it really worth?
    Questions about value arise as IT investment and spend increase. How to answer these questions is critical.

    At the end of the day, telling IT's spend story to the business is a significant challenge if you don't understand your audience, have a shared vocabulary, or use a repeatable framework.

    Mapping your IT spend against a reusable framework helps generate transparency

    A framework makes transparency possible by simplifying methods, creating common language, and reducing noise.

    However, the best methodological framework won't work if the materials and information plugged into it are weak. With IT spend, the materials and information are your staff and your vendor financial data. To achieve true transparency, inputs must have the following three characteristics:

    Availability Reliability Usability
    The data and information are up-to-date and accessible when needed. The data and information are accurate, complete, and verifiable. The data and information are clearly defined, consistently and predictably organized, consumable, and meaningful for decision-making.

    A framework is an organizing principle. When it comes to better understanding your IT spend, the things being organized by a framework are your method and your data.

    If your IT spend information is transparent, you have an excellent foundation for having the right conversations with the right people in order to make strategically impactful decisions.

    Info-Tech's approach enables meaningful dialogue with stakeholders about IT spend

    View of meaningful dialogue with stakeholders about IT spend

    Investing time in preparing and mapping your IT spend data enables better IT governance

    While other IT spend transparency methods exist, Info-Tech's is designed to be straightforward and tactical.

    Info-Tech method for IT spend transparency

    Put your data to work instead of being put to work by your data.

    Introducing Info-Tech's methodology for creating transparency on technology spend

    1. Know your objectives 2. Gather required data 3. Map your IT staff spend 4. Map your IT vendor spend 5. Identify implications for IT
    Phase Steps
    1. Review your business context
    2. Set IT staff and vendor spend transparency objectives
    3. Assess effort and readiness
    1. Collect IT staff spend data
    2. Collect IT vendor spend data
    3. Define industry-specific CXO Business View categories
    1. Categorize IT staff spend in each of the four views
    2. Validate
    1. Categorize IT vendor spend in each of the four views
    2. Validate
    1. Analyze your findings
    2. Craft your key messages
    3. Create an executive presentation
    Phase Outcomes Goals and scope for your IT spend and staffing transparency effort. Information and data required to perform the IT staff and vendor spend transparency initiative. A mapping of the allocation of IT staff spend across the four views of the Info-Tech ITFM Cost Model. A mapping of the allocation of IT vendor spend across the four views of the Info-Tech ITFM Cost Model. An analysis of your results and a presentation to aid your communication of findings with stakeholders.

    Insight Summary

    Overarching insight
    Take the perspective of key stakeholders and lay out your organization's complete IT spend footprint in terms they understand to enable meaningful conversations and start evolving your IT financial management capability.

    Phase 1 insight
    Your IT spend transparency efforts are only useful if you actually do something with the outcomes of those efforts. Be clear about where you want your IT transparency journey to take you.

    Phase 2 insight
    Your IT spend transparency efforts are only as good as the quality of your inputs. Take the time to properly source, clean, and organize your data.

    Phase 3 insight
    Map your IT staff spend data first. It involves work but is relatively straightforward. Practice your mapping approach here and carry forward your lessons learned.

    Phase 4 insight
    The importance of good, usable data will become apparent when mapping your IT vendor spend. Apply consistent and meaningful vendor labels to enable true aggregation and insight.

    Phase 5 insight
    Communicating your final IT spend transparency mapping with executive stakeholders is your opportunity to debut IT financial management as not just an IT issue but an organization-wide concern.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals.

    Use this tool in Phases 1-4

    IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook

    Input your IT staff and vendor spend data to generate visual outputs for analysis and presentation in your communications.

    Key deliverable:

    IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Executive Presentation

    Create a showcase for your newly-transparent IT staff and vendor spend data and present it to key business stakeholders.

    Use this tool in Phase 5

    IT and business blueprint benefits

    IT Benefits Business Benefits
    • Gain insight into exactly where you're spending IT funds on hardware, software, service providers, and the workforce.
    • Understand how much it's costing IT to deliver specific IT services.
    • Illustrate differences in business consumption of IT spend.
    • Learn the ratio of spend allocated to innovation vs. growth vs. keeping the lights on (KTLO).
    • Develop a series of core IT spend metrics including IT spend as a percent of revenue, IT spend per organization employee, and IT spend per IT staff member.
    • Create a complete IT spend baseline to serve as a foundation for future benchmarking, cost optimization, and other forms of IT financial analysis.
    • Understand the relative allocation of IT spend across capital vs. operational expenditure.
    • See the degree to which IT differentially supports and enables organizational goals, strategies, and functions.
    • Have better data for informing the organization's IT spend allocation and prioritization decisions.
    • Gain better visibility into real-life IT spending behaviors, cadences, and patterns.
    • Identify potential areas of spend waste as well as underinvestment.
    • Understand the true value that IT brings to the business.

    Measure the value of this blueprint

    You will know that your IT spend and staffing transparency effort is succeeding when:

    • Your understanding of where technology funds are really being allocated is comprehensive.
    • You're having active and meaningful dialogue with key stakeholders about IT spend issues.
    • IT spend transparency is a permanent part of your IT financial management toolkit.

    In phase 1 of this blueprint, we will help you identify initiatives where you can leverage the outcomes of your IT spend and staffing transparency effort.

    In phases 2, 3, and 4, we will guide you through the process of mapping your IT staff and vendor spend data so you can generate your own IT spend metrics based on reliable sources and verifiable facts.

    Win #1: Knowing how to reliably source the financial data you need to make decisions.

    Win #2: Getting your IT spend data in an organized format that you can actually analyze.

    Win #3: Having a framework that puts IT spend in a language stakeholders understand.

    Win #4: Gaining a practical starting point to mature ITFM practices like cost optimization.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit Guided Implementation Workshop Consulting
    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks are used throughout all four options.

    Guided Implementation

    Info-Tech recommends the following calls in your Guided Implementation.

    Phase 1: Know your objectives Phase 2: Gather required data Phase 3: Map your IT staff spend Phase 4: Map your IT vendor spend Phase 5: Identify implications for IT
    Call #1: Discuss your IT spend and staffing transparency objectives and readiness. Call #2: Review spend and staffing data sources and identify data organization and cleanup needs. Call #3: Review your mapped IT staff spend and resolve lingering challenges. Call #4: Review your mapped IT vendor spend and resolve lingering challenges. Call #5: Analyze your mapping outputs for opportunities and devise next steps.

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is between four to six calls over the course of two to three months.

    Want even more help with your IT spend transparency effort?

    Let us fast-track your IT spend journey.

    The path to IT financial management maturity starts with knowing exactly where your money is going. To streamline this effort, Info-Tech offers an IT Spend & Staffing Benchmarking service that provides full transparency into where your money is going without any heavy lifting on your part.

    This unique service features:

    • A client-proven approach to meet your IT spend transparency goals.
    • Vendor and staff spend mapping that reveals business consumption of IT.
    • Industry benchmarking to compare your spending and staffing to that of your peers.
    • Results in a fraction of the time with much less effort than going it alone.
    • Expert review of results and ongoing discussions with Info-Tech analysts.

    If you'd like Info-Tech to pave the way to IT spend transparency, contact your account manager for more information - we're happy to talk anytime.

    Phase 1

    Know Your Objectives

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Establish IT spend and staffing transparency uses and objectives
    • Assess your readiness to tackle IT spend and staffing transparency

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Head of IT
    • IT financial lead
    • Other members of IT management

    Phase 1: Know your objectives

    Envision what transparency can do.

    You're at the very beginning of your IT spend transparency journey. In this phase you will:

    • Set your objectives for making your IT spend and staffing transparent.
    • Assess your readiness to tackle the exercise and gauge how much work you'll need to do in order to do it well.

    "I've heard this a lot lately from clients: 'I've got my hands on this data, but it's not structured in a way that will allow me to make any decisions about it. I have these journal entries and they have some accounting codes, GL descriptors, cost objects, and some vendors, but it's not enough detail to make any decisions about my services, my applications, my asset spend.'"
    - Angie Reynolds, Principal Research Director, ITFM Practice, Info-Tech Research Group

    Transparency positively enables both business outcomes and the practice of business ethics

    However, transparency's real superpower is in how it provides fact-based context.

    • More accurate and relevant data for decision-making.
    • Better managed and more impactful financial outcomes.
    • Increased inclusion of people in the decisions that affect them.
    • Clearer accountabilities for organizational efficiency and effectiveness goals.
    • Concrete proof that business priorities and decisions are being acted on and implemented.
    • Greater trust and respect between IT and the business.
    • Demonstration of integrity in how funds are being used.

    IT spend transparency efforts are only useful if you actually do something with the outputs

    Identify in advance how you plan to leverage IT spend transparency outcomes.

    CFO expense view

    • Demonstrate actual IT costs at the right level of granularity.
    • Update/change the categories finance uses to track IT spend.
    • Adjust the expected CapEx/OpEx ratio.

    CXO business view

    • Calculate consumption of IT resources by department.
    • Implement a showback/chargeback mechanism.
    • Change the funding conversation about proposed IT projects.

    CIO service view

    • Calculate the total cost to deliver a specific IT service.
    • Adjust the IT service spend-to-value ratio as per business priorities.
    • Rightsize IT service levels to reflect true value to the business.

    CEO innovation view

    • Formalize the organization's position on use of cloud/outsourcing.
    • Reduce the portion of spend dedicated to "keeping the lights on."
    • Develop a plan for boosting commitment to innovation investment.

    When determining your end objectives, think about the real questions IT is being asked by the business and how IT spend transparency will help you answer them.

    CFO: Financial accounting perspective

    IT spend used to be looked at from a strictly financial accounting perspective - this is the view of the CFO and the finance department. Their question, "exactly how is IT spending all that money we give them," is really about how money is distributed across different asset classes. This question breaks down into other questions that IT leaders needs to ask themselves in order to provide answers:

    • How should I classify my IT costs? What are the standard categories you need to have that are meaningful to folks crunching the corporate numbers? If you're too detailed, it won't make sense to them. If you pick outmoded categories, you'll have to adjust in the future as IT evolves, which makes tracking year-over-year spend patterns harder.
    • What information should I include in my plans and reports? This is about two things. One is about communicating with the finance department in language that reduces back-and-forth and eliminates misinterpretation. The other is about aligning with the categories the finance department uses to track financial data in the general ledger.
    • How do I justify current spend? This is about clarity and transparency. Specifically itemizing spend into categories that are meaningful for your audience does a lot of justification work for you since you don't have to re-explain what everything means.
    • How do I justify a budget increase? In a declining economy, this question may not be appropriate. However, establishing a baseline puts you in a better position to discuss spend requirements based on past performance and to focus the conversation.

    Exactly how is IT spending all that money we give them?

    Example
    Asset Class % IT Spend
    Workforce 42.72%
    Software - Cloud 9.26%
    Software - On Prem 13.61%
    Hardware - Cloud 0.59%
    Hardware - On Prem 15.68%
    Contract Services 18.14%
    Info-Tech IT Spend & Staffing Studies, 2022.

    CIO: IT operations management perspective

    As the CIO role was adopted, IT spend was viewed from the IT operations management perspective. Optimizing the IT delivery model is a critical step to reducing time to provision services. For the IT leader, the questions they need to ask themselves are:

    • What's the impact of cloud adoption on speed of delivery? Leveraging a SaaS solution can reduce time to deployment as well as increase your ability to scale; however, integration with other functionality will still be a challenge that will incur costs.
    • Where can I improve spend efficiency? This is about optimizing spend in your IT delivery model. What service levels does the business require and what's the most cost-effective way to meet those levels without incurring significant technical debt?
    • Is my support model optimized? By reviewing where support staff are focused and which services are using most of your resources, you can investigate underlying drivers of your staffing requirements. If staff costs in support of a business function are high, perhaps the portfolio of applications needs to be reviewed.
    • How does our spend compare to others? Benchmarking against peers is a useful input, but reflects common practice, not best practice. For example, if you need to invest in IT security, your entire industry is lagging on this front, and you happen to be doing slightly better than most, then bringing forth this benchmark won't help you make the case. Starting with year-over-year internal benchmarking is essential - establish your categories, establish your baseline, and track it consistently.

    Does the amount we spend on each IT service make sense?

    Example
    Service Area % IT Spend
    App Development 9.06%
    App Maintenance 30.36%
    Hosting/Network 25.39%
    End User 18.59%
    Data & BI 3.58%
    Security & Risk 5.21%
    IT Management 7.82%
    Info-Tech IT Spend & Staffing Studies, 2022.

    CXO: Business unit perspective

    As business requests have increased, so too has the importance of the business unit perspective. Each business function has a unique mandate to fulfill in the organization and also competes with other business functions for IT resources. By understanding business consumption of IT, organizations can bring transparency and drive a different dialog with their business partners. Every IT leader should find out the answers to these questions:

    • Which business units consume the most IT resources? By understanding consumption of IT by business function, IT organizations can clearly articulate which business units are getting the highest share of IT resources. This will bring much needed clarity when it comes to IT spend prioritization and investment.
    • Which business units are underserved by IT? By providing full transparency into where all IT spend is consumed, organizations can determine if certain business functions may need increased attention in an upcoming budget cycle. Knowing which levers to pull is critical in aligning IT activities with delivering business value.
    • How do I best communicate spend data internally? Different audiences need information presented to them differently. This is not just about the language - it's also about the frequency, format, and channel you use. Ask your audiences directly what methods of communication stand the best chance of you being seen and heard.
    • Where do I need better business sponsorship for IT projects? If a lot of IT spend is going toward one or two business units, the leaders of those units need to be active sponsors of IT projects and associated spend that will benefit all users.

    Why doesn't my business unit get more support from IT?

    Example
    Business Function % IT Spend
    HR Department 6.16%
    Finance Department 15.15%
    IT Department 10.69%
    Business Function 1 23.80%
    Business Function 2 10.20%
    Business Function 3 6.80%
    Business Function 4 27.20%
    Source: Info-Tech IT Spend & Staffing Studies, 2022.

    CEO: Strategic vs. operations perspective

    With a business view now available, evaluating IT spend from a strategic standpoint is critical. Simply put, how much is being spent keeping the lights on (KTLO) in the organization versus supporting business or organizational growth versus net-new business innovations? This view is not about what IT costs but rather how it is being prioritized to drive revenue, operating margin, or market share. Here are the questions IT leaders should be asking themselves along with the organization's executive leadership and the CEO:

    • Why is KTLO spend so high? This question is a good gauge of where the line is drawn between operations and strategy. Many IT departments want to reduce time spent on maintenance and redeploy resource investment toward strategic projects. This reallocation must include retiring or eliminating technologies to free up funds.
    • What should our operational spend priorities be? Maintenance and basic operations aren't going anywhere. The issue is what is necessary and what could be done more wisely. Are you throwing good money after bad on a high-maintenance legacy system?
    • Which projects and investments should we prioritize? The answer to this question should tightly align with business strategic goals and account for the lion's share of growth and innovation spend.
    • Are we spending enough on innovative initiatives? This is the ultimate dialogue between business partners, the CEO, and IT that needs to take place, yet often doesn't.

    I know what IT costs us, but what is it really worth?

    Example
    Focus Area % IT Spend
    KTLO 89.16%
    Grow 7.18%
    Innovate 3.66%
    Info-Tech IT Spend Studies, 2022.

    Be clear about where you want your IT spend transparency journey to take you in real life

    Transparent IT spend data will allow you to have conversations you couldn't have before. Consider this example of how telling an IT spend story could evolve.

    I want to ...
    Analyze the impact of the cloud on IT operating expenditure to update finance's expectations of a realistic IT CapEx/OpEx ratio now and into the future.

    To address the problem of ...

    • Many of our key software vendors have eliminated on-premises products and only offer software as an OpEx service.
    • Assumptions that modern IT solutions are largely on-premises and can be treated as capitalizable assets are out-of-date and don't reflect IT financial realities.

    And will use transparency to ...

    • Provide the CFO with specific, accurate, and annotated OpEx by product/service and vendor for all cloud-based and on-premises solutions.
    • Facilitate a realistic calculation of CapEx/OpEx distribution based on actuals, as well as let us develop defendable projections of OpEx into the future based on typical annual service fee increases and anticipated growth in the number of users/licenses.

    1.1 Establish ITFM objectives that leverage IT spend transparency

    Duration: One hour

    1. Consider the problems or issues commonly voiced by the business about IT, as well as your own ongoing challenges in communicating with stakeholders. Document these problems/issues as questions or statements as spoken by a person. To help structure your brainstorming, consider these general process domains and examples:
      1. Spend tracking and reporting. E.g. Why is IT's OpEx so high? We need you to increase IT's percentage of CapEx.
      2. Service levels and business continuity. E.g. Why do we need to hire more service desk staff? There are more of them in IT than any other role.
      3. Project and operations resourcing. E.g. Why can't IT just buy this new app we want? It's not very expensive.
      4. Strategy and innovation. E.g. Did output increase or decrease last quarter per input unit? IT should be able to run those reports for us.
    2. For each problem/issue noted, identify:
      1. The source(s) of the question/concern (e.g. CEO, CFO, CXO, CIO).
      2. The financial process involved (e.g. accurate costing, verification of costs, building a business case to invest).
    3. For each problem/issue, identify a broader project-style initiative where having transparent IT spend data is a valuable input. One initiative may apply to multiple problems/issues. For each initiative:
      1. Give it a working title.
      2. State the goal for the initiative with reference to ITFM aspirations.
      3. Identify key stakeholders (these will likely overlap with the problem/issue source).
      4. Set general time frames for resolution.

    Document your outputs on the slide immediately following the instruction slides for this exercise. Examples are included.

    1.1 Establish ITFM objectives that leverage IT spend transparency

    Input Output
    • Organizational knowledge
    • List of the potential uses and objectives of transparent IT spend and staffing data
    Materials Participants
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Head of IT
    • IT financial lead

    ITFM initiatives that leverage transparency

    Problem/Issue Statement Source/ Stakeholder Associated ITFM Process Potential Initiative Initiative Goal Time Frame
    "Why is IT's OpEx so high? We need you to increase IT's percentage of CapEx." CFO IT spend categorization and reporting. Analyze the impact of the cloud on IT operating expenditure. To update finance's expectations of a realistic IT CapEx/OpEx ratio. <12 months
    "Why do we need to hire more service desk staff? There are more of them in IT than any other role." CFO, VP of HR Business case for hiring IT staff. Document ongoing IT support requirements for proposed ERP platform migration project. To ensure sufficient resources for an anticipated increase in service desk tickets due to implementation of a new ERP system. 1-3 months
    "Why can't IT just buy this new app we want? It's not very expensive." CEO, all CXOs/VPs Total cost of technology ownership. Develop a mechanism to review the lifecycle impact on IT of proposed technology purchases. To determine if functionality of new tool already exists in the org. and the total cost of ownership of a new app. <6 months
    "Did output increase or decrease last quarter per input unit? IT should be able to run those reports for us." CEO, CFO, VP of Production IT service costing. Develop an organizational business intelligence strategy. To create a comprehensive plan for evolving BI capability in the organization and transferring report development to users. Select a department for pilot. <12 months

    Your organization's governance culture will affect how you approach transparency

    Know your governance culture Lower Governance
    • Few regulations.
    • Financial reporting is largely internal.
    • Change is frequent and rapid.
    • Informal or nonexistent mechanisms and structures.
    • Data sharing behavior driven by competitive concerns.
    Higher Governance
    • Many regulations.
    • Stringent and regular external reporting requirements.
    • Change is limited and/or slow.
    • Defined and established mechanisms and structures.
    • Data sharing behavior driven by regulatory concerns.
    Determine impact on opportunities How does your governance culture impact IT spend transparency opportunities?
    Resistance to formality and bureaucracy Resistance to change and uncertainty
    Set expectations and approach You have plenty of room to implement transparency rigor within the confines of IT, but getting others to give you the time and attention you want will be a challenge. One-on-one, informal relationship building to create goodwill and dialogue is needed before putting forth recommendations or numbers. Many existing procedures must be accommodated and respected. While you can benefit by working with preexisting mechanisms and touchpoints, expect any changes you want to make to things like IT cost categories or CapEx/OpEx ratios to require a lot of time, meetings, and case-making.

    IT's current maturity around ITFM practice will also affect your approach to transparency

    Know your ITFM maturity level Lower ITFM Maturity
    • No/few formal policies, standards, or procedures exist.
    • There is little/no formal education or experience within IT around budget, costing, charging, or accounting practices.
    • Financial reporting is sporadic and inconsistent in its contents.
    • Business cases are rarely used in decision-making.
    • Financial data is neither reliable nor readily available.
    Higher ITFM Maturity
    • Formal policies, standards, and procedures are enforced organization-wide for all financial management activities.
    • Formally-trained accountants are embedded within IT.
    • Financial reporting is regular, scheduled, and defined.
    • Business cases are leveraged in most decision-making activities.
    • Financial data is governed, centralized, and current.
    Determine stakeholders' financial literacy How does your degree of ITFM maturity impact IT spend transparency opportunities?
    Improve your own financial literacy first Determine stakeholders' financial literacy
    Set expectations and approach Brush up on core financial management and accounting concepts before taking the discussion beyond IT's walls. Do start mapping your costs, but just know how to communicate what the data is saying before sharing it. Not everyone will be at your level, familiar with ITFM language and concepts, or focused on the same things you are. Gauge where your audience is at so you can prepare for meaningful dialogue.

    1.2 Assess your readiness to tackle IT spend transparency

    Duration: One hour

    Note: This assessment is general in nature. It's intended to help you identify and prepare for potential challenges in your IT spend and staffing transparency effort.

    1. Rate your agreement with the "Data & Information" and "Experience, Expertise, & Support" statements listed on the slide immediately following the two instruction slides for this exercise. For each statement, indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree, where:
      1. 1 = Strongly disagree
      2. 2 = Disagree
      3. 3 = Neither agree nor disagree
      4. 4 = Agree
      5. 5 = Strongly agree
    2. Add up your numerical scores for all statements, where the highest possible score is 65.
    3. Assess your general readiness against the following guidelines:
      1. 50-65: Ready. The transparency exercise will involve work, but should be straightforward since you have the data, skills, tools, processes, and support to do it.
      2. 40-49: Ready, with caveats. The transparency exercise is doable but will require some preparatory legwork and investigation on your part around data sourcing, organization, and interpretation.
      3. 30-39: Challenged. The transparency exercise will present some obstacles. Expect to encounter data gaps, inconsistencies, errors, roadblocks, and frustrations that will need to be resolved.
      4. Less than 30: Not ready. You don't have the data, skills, tools, processes, and/or support to do the data transparency exercise. Take time to develop a stronger foundation of financial literacy and governance before tackling it.

    Document your outputs on the slide immediately following the two instruction slides for this exercise.

    1.2 Assess your readiness to tackle IT spend transparency

    InputOutput
    • Organizational knowledge
    • Estimation of IT spend and staffing transparency effort
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Head of IT
    • IT financial lead

    IT spend transparency readiness assessment

    Data & Information
    Statement Rating
    We know how to access all IT department spend records.
    We know how to access all non-IT-department technology spend records.
    We know how to access all IT vendor/contractor agreements.
    We know how to access data about our IT staff costs and allocation, such as organizational charts and salaries/benefits.
    Our financial and staffing data is up-to-date.
    Our financial and staffing data are labeled, described, and organized so that we know what they're referring to.
    Our financial and staffing data are in a format that we can easily manipulate (e.g. export, copy and paste, perform calculations).
    Experience, Expertise, & Support
    Statement Rating
    We have sufficient expertise within the IT department to navigate and accurately interpret financial records.
    We have reasonable access to expertise/resources in our finance department to support us in an IT spend transparency exercise.
    We can allocate sufficient time (about 40 hours) and resources in the near term to do an IT spend transparency exercise.
    We have current accountabilities to track and internally report financial information to others on at least a monthly basis.
    There are existing financial policies, procedures, and standards in the organization with which we must closely adhere and comply.
    We have had the experience of participating in, or responding to the results of, an internal or external audit.

    Rating scale:
    1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Neither agree nor disagree; 4 = Agree; 5 = Strongly agree
    Assessment scale:
    Less than 30 = Not ready; 30-39 = Challenged; 40-49 = Ready with caveats; 50-65 = Ready

    Take a closer look at the statements you rated 1, 2, or 3. These will be areas of challenge no matter what your total score on the assessment scale.

    Phase 1: Know your objectives

    Achievement summary

    You've now completed the first two steps on your IT spend transparency journey. You have:

    • Set your objectives for making your IT spend and staffing transparent.
    • Assessed your readiness to tackle the exercise and know how much work you'll need to do in order to do it well.

    "Mapping to a transparency model is labor intensive. You can do it once and never revisit it again, but we would never advise that. What it does is play well into an IT financial management maturity roadmap."
    - Monica Braun, Research Director, ITFM Practice, Info-Tech Research Group

    Phase 2

    Gather Required Data

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Gather, clean, and organize your data
    • Build your industry-specific business views

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Head of IT
    • IT financial lead
    • Other members of IT management

    Phase 2: Gather required data

    Finish your preparation.

    You're now ready to do the final preparation for your IT spend and staffing transparency journey. In this phase you will:

    • Gather your IT spend and staffing data and information.
    • Clean and organize your data to streamline mapping.
    • Identify your baseline data points.

    "Some feel like they don't have all the data, so they give up. Don't. Every data point counts."
    - Rex Ding, Research Specialist, ITFM Practice, Info-Tech Research Group

    Your IT spend transparency efforts are only as good as the quality of your inputs

    Aim for a comprehensive, complete, and accurate set of data and information.

    Diagram of comprehensive, complete, and accurate set of data and information

    Start by understanding what's included in technology spend

    Info-Tech's ITFM Technology Inventory

    In scope:

    • All network, telecom, and data center equipment.
    • All end-user productivity software and devices (e.g. laptops, peripheral devices, cell phones).
    • Information security.
    • All acquisition, development, maintenance, and management of business and operations software.
    • All systems used for the storage and management of business assets, data, records, and information.
    • All managed IT services.
    • Third-party consulting services.
    • All identifiable spend from the business for the above.

    Expand your thinking: Total tech spend goes beyond what's under IT's operational umbrella

    "Technology" means all technology in the organization regardless of where it lives, who bought it, who owns it, who runs it, or who uses it.

    IT may have low or no visibility into technologies that exist in the broader business environment beyond IT. Accept that you won't gain 100% visibility right now. However, do get started and be persistent.

    Where to look for non-IT technology ...

    • Highly specialized business functions - niche tools that are probably used by only a few people.
    • Power users and the "underserved" - cloud-based workflow, communication, and productivity tools they got on their own.
    • Operational technology - network-connected industrial, building, or physical security sensors and control systems.
    • Recently acquired/merged entities - inherited software.

    Who might get you what you need ...

    • Business unit and team leaders - identification of what they use and copies of their spend records and/or contracts.
    • Finance - a report of the "software" expenditure category to spot unrecognized technologies and their owners.
    • Vendors - copies of contracts if not forthcoming internally.
    • Your service desk - informal knowledge gained about unknown technologies at play in the course of doing their job.

    The IT spend and staffing transparency exercise is an opportunity to kick-start a technology discovery process that will give you and the business a true picture of your technology profile, use, and spend.

    Seek out data at the right level of granularity with the right supporting information

    Key data and information to seek out:

    • Credits applied to appropriate debits that show net expense, or detailed descriptions of credits with no matching debit.
    • Cash-based accounting (not accrual accounting). If accrual, will need to determine how to simplify the data for your uses.
    • Vendor names, asset classes, descriptors, and departments.
    • A total spend amount (CapEx + OpEx) that:
      • Aligns with the spend period.
      • Passes your gut check for total IT spend.
      • Includes annual amounts for multi-year contracts (e.g. one year of a three-year Microsoft enterprise agreement).
      • Includes technology spend from the business (e.g. OT that IT supports).
    • Insights on large projects.
    • Consolidated recurring payments, salaries and benefits, and other small expenses.

    Look for these data descriptors in your files:

    • Cost center/accounting unit
    • Cost center/department description
    • GL ACCT
    • CL account description
    • Activity description
    • Status
    • Program/business function/project description
    • Accounting period
    • Transaction amount
    • Vendor/vendor name
    • Product/product name

    Avoid data that's hard to use or problematic as it will slow you down and bring limited benefits

    Spend data that's out of scope:

    • Depreciation/amortization.
    • Gain or loss of asset write-off.
    • Physical security (e.g. key cards, cameras, motion sensors, floodlights).
    • Printer consumables costs.
    • Heating and cooling costs (for data centers).

    Challenging data formats:

    • Large raw data files with limited or no descriptors.
    • Major accounts (hardware and software) combined in the same line item.
    • Line items (especially software) with no vendor reference information.
    • PDF files or screenshots that you can't extract data from readily. Use Excel or CSV files whenever possible.

    Getting at the data you need can be easy or hard – it all depends

    This is where your governance culture and ITFM maturity start to come into play.

    Data source Potential data and information What to expect
    IT Current/past budget, vendor agreements, IT project records, discretionary spend, number of IT employees. The rigor of your ITFM practice and centralization of data and documents will affect how straightforward this is.
    Finance General ledger, cash and income statements, contractor payments and other accounts payable, general revenue. Secure their expertise early. Let them know what you're trying to do and what you need. They may be willing to prepare data for you in the format you need and help you decipher records.
    Purchasing List of vendors/suppliers, vendor agreements, purchase invoices. Purchasing often has more descriptive information about vendors than finance. They can also point you to tech spend in other departments that you didn't know about.
    Human Resources Organizational chart, staff salaries and benefits, number of employees overall and by department. Data about benefits costs is something you're not likely to have, and there's only one place you can reliably get it.
    Other Business Units Non-IT technology spend vendor agreements and purchase invoices, number of department employees. Other departments may be tracking spend in an entirely different way than you. Be prepared to dig and reconcile.

    There may be some data or information you can't get without a Herculean effort. Don't worry about it too much - these items are usually relatively minor and won't significantly affect the overall picture.

    Commit to finding out what you don't know

    Many IT leaders don't have visibility into other departments' technology spend. In some cases, the fact that spend is even happening may be a complete surprise.

    Near-term visibility fix ...

    • Ask your finance department for a report on all technology-related spend categories. "Software" is a broad category that finance departments tend to track. Scan the report for items that don't look familiar and confirm the originating department or approver.
    • Check in with the procurement office. See what technology-related contracts they have on record and which departments "own" them. Get copies of those contracts if possible.
    • Contact individual department heads or technology spend approvers. Devise your contact shortlist based on what you already know or learned from finance and procurement. Position your outreach as a discovery process that supports your transparency effort. Avoid coming across as though you're judging their spend or planning to take over their technologies.

    Long-term visibility fix ...

    • Develop your relationships with other business unit leaders. This will help open the lines of communication permanently.
    • Establish a cross-functional central technology office or group. The main task of this unit is to set and manage technology standards organization-wide, including standards for tracking and documenting technology costs and asset lifecycle factors.
    • Ensure IT is formally involved in all technology spend proposals and plans. This gives IT the opportunity to assess them for security compliance, IT network/system interoperability, manageability, and IT support requirements prior to purchase.
    • Ensure IT is notified of all technology financial transactions. This includes contracts, invoices, and payments for all one-time purchases, subscription fees, and maintenance costs.

    Finally, note any potential anomalies in the IT spend period you're looking at

    No two years have the exact same spend patterns. One-time spend for a big capital project, for example, can dramatically alter your overall spend landscape.

    Look for the following anomalies:

    • New or ongoing capital implementations or projects that span more than one fiscal year.
    • Completed projects that have recently transitioned, or are transitioning, from CapEx (decreasing) to OpEx (increasing).
    • A major internal reorganization or merger, acquisition, or divestiture event.
    • Crises, disasters, or other rare emergencies.
    • Changes in IT funding sources (e.g. new or expiring grants).

    These anomalies often explain why IT spend is unusually high in certain areas. There's often a good business reason.

    In many cases, doing a separate spend transparency exercise for these anomalous projects or events can isolate their costs from other spend so their true nature and impact can be better understood.

    2.1 Gather your input data and information

    Duration: Variable

    1. Develop a complete list of the spending and staffing data and information you need to complete the transparency mapping exercise. For each required item, note the following:
      1. Description of data needed (i.e. type, timeframe, and format).
      2. Ideal timeframe or deadline for receipt.
      3. Probable source(s) and contact(s).
      4. Additional facilitation/support required.
      5. Person on your transparency team responsible for obtaining it.
    2. Set up a data and information repository to store all files as soon as they're received. Ideally, you'll want all data/information files to be in an electronic format so that everything can be stored in one place. Avoid paper documents if possible.
    3. Conduct your outreach to obtain the input data and information on your list. This could include delegating it to a subordinate, sending emails, making phone calls, booking meetings, and so on.
    4. Review the data and information received to confirm that it's the right type of data, at the correct level of granularity, for the right timeframe, in a usable format, and is generally accurate.
    5. Enter documentation about your data and information sources in tab "1. Data & Information Sources" in the IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook to reflect what you needed and where you got it in order to make the discovery process easier in the future.
    6. In the same tab in the IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook, document any significant events that occurred that directly or indirectly impacted the selected year's spend values. These could include mergers/acquisitions/divestitures, major reorganizations or changes in leadership, significant shifts in product offerings or strategic direction, large capital projects, legal/regulatory changes, natural disasters, or changes in the economy.

    Download the IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook

    2.1 Gather your input data and information

    InputOutput
    • Knowledge of potential data and information sources
    • List of data and information required to complete the IT spend and staffing transparency exercise
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Head of IT
    • IT financial lead

    Tidy up your data before beginning any spend mapping

    Most organizations aren't immaculate in their tech spend documentation and tracking practices. This creates data rife with gaps that lives in hard-to-use formats.

    The more preparation you do to approach the "good data" intersection point in the diagram below, the easier your mapping effort will be and the more useful and insightful your final findings.

    Venn diagram of good data

    Make your data "un-unique" to reduce the number of line items and make it manageable

    There's a good chance that the IT spend data you've received is in the form of tens of thousands of unique line items. Use the checklist below to help you roll it up.

    Warning: Never overwrite your original data. Insert new columns/rows and put your alternate information in these instead.

    Step 1: Standardize vendor names

    • Start with known large vendors.
    • Select a standard name for the vendor.
    • Brainstorm possible variations on the vendor name, including abbreviations and shortforms.
    • Search for the vendor in your data and document the new standardized vendor name in the appropriate row.
    • Repeat the above for all vendors.
    • Sort the new vendor name column from A-Z. Look for instances where names remain unique or are missing entirely. Reconcile if needed and fill in missing data.

    Step 2: Consolidate vendor spend

    • Sort the new vendor name column from A-Z. Start with vendors that have the most line items.
    • Add together related spend items from a given vendor. Create a new row for the consolidated spend item and flag it as consolidated. Keep the following item types in separate rows:
      • Hardware vs. software spend for the same vendor.
      • Cloud vs. on-premises spend for the same vendor.
    • Repeat the above for all vendors.
    • Consider breaking out separate rows for overly consolidated line items that contain too many different types of IT spend.

    2.2 Clean and organize your data

    Duration: Variable

    1. Check to ensure that you have all data and information required to conduct the IT spend transparency exercise.
    2. Conduct an initial scan to assess the data's current state of hygiene and overall usability. Flag anything of concern and follow up with the data/information provider to fix or reconcile any issues.
    3. Normalize your data to make it easier to work with. This includes selecting data format standards and changing anything that doesn't conform to those standards. This includes items such as date conventions, currencies, and so on.
    4. Standardize product and vendor naming/references throughout to enable searching, sorting, and grouping. For example, Microsoft Office may be variably referred to as "Microsoft", "Office", "Office 365", and "Office365" throughout your data. Pick one descriptor for the product/vendor and replace all related references with that descriptor.
    5. Consolidate and aggregate your data. Ideally, the data you received from your sources has already been simplified; however, you may need to further organize it to reduce the number of individual line items to a more manageable number. The transparency exercise uses relatively high-level categories, so combine data sets and aggregate where feasible without losing appropriate granularity.
    6. Archive any original copies of files that have been modified or replaced with consolidated/aggregated versions for future reference if needed.

    2.2 Clean and organize your data

    InputOutput
    • Data and information files
    • A normalized set of data and information for completing the IT spend and staffing transparency exercise
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Head of IT
    • IT financial lead

    Select IT spend "buckets" for the CXO Business View as your final preparatory step

    Every organization has both industry-agnostic and industry-specific lines of business that are the direct beneficiaries of IT spend.

    Common shared business functions:

    • Human resources.
    • Finance and accounting.
    • Sales/customer service.
    • Marketing and advertising.
    • Legal services and regulatory compliance.
    • Information technology.

    It may seem odd to see IT on the business functions list since the purpose of this exercise is to map IT spend. For business view purposes, IT spend refers to what IT spends on itself to support its own internal operations.

    Examples of industry-specific functions:

    • Manufacturing: Product research and development; production operations; supply chain management.
    • Retail banking: Core banking services; loan, mortgage and credit services; investment and wealth management services.
    • Hospitals: Patient intake and admissions; patient diagnosis; patient treatment; patient recovery and ongoing care.
    • Insurance: Actuarial analysis; policy creation; underwriting; claims processing.

    See the Appendix of this blueprint for definitions of shared business functions plus sample industry-specific business view categories.

    Define your CXO Business View categories to set yourself up well for future ITFM analyses

    The CXO Business View buckets you set up today are tools you can and should reuse in your overall approach to ITFM governance. Spend some time to get them right.

    Stay high-level

    Getting too granular invites administrative headaches and overhead. Keep things high-level and general:

    • Limit the number of direct stakeholders represented: This will reduce communication overhead and ensure you're dealing only with people who have real decision-making authority.
    • Look to your org. chart: Note the departments or business units listed across the top of the chart that have one executive or top-ranking senior manager accountable for them. These business units often translate as-is into a tidy CXO Business View category.

    Limit your number of buckets

    Tracking IT spend across more than 8-10 shared and industry-specific business categories is impractical.

    • Simplify your options: Too many buckets gets confusing and invites time-wasting doubt.
    • Reduce future rework: Business structures will change, which means recategorizing spend data. Using a forklift is a lot easier than using tweezers.
    • Stick to major business units: Create separate "Business Other" and "Industry Other" catch-all categories to track IT spend for smaller functions that fall outside of major business unit structures.

    Stay high-level with the CXO Business View

    Be clear on what's in and what's out of your categories to keep everyone on the same page

    Clear lines of demarcation between CXO Business View categories reduce confusion, doubt, and wheel-reinvention when deciding where to allocate IT spend.

    Ensure clear boundaries

    Mutual exclusivity is key when defining categories in any taxonomical structure.

    • Avoid overlaps: Each high-level business function category should have few or no core function or process overlaps with another business function category. Aim for clear vertical separation.
    • Be encompassing: When defining a category, list all the business capabilities and sub-functions included in that category. For example, if defining the finance and accounting function, remember to specify its less obvious accountabilities, like enterprise asset management if appropriate.

    Identify exclusions

    Listing what's out can be just as informative and clarifying as listing what's in.

    • Beware odd bedfellows: Minor business groups are often tucked under a bigger organizational entity even though the two use different processes and technologies. Separate them if appropriate and state this exclusion in the bigger entity's definition.
    • Draw a line: If a process crosses business function categories, state which sub-steps are out of scope.
    • Document your decisions: This helps ensure you allocate IT spend the same way every time.

    Clear lines of demarcation between CXO Business View categories

    2.3 Build your industry-specific business views

    Duration: Two hours

    1. Confirm your list of high-level shared business services (human resources, finance and accounting, etc.) as provided in Info-Tech's IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook. Rename them if needed to match the nomenclature used in your organization.
    2. Set and define your additional list of high-level, industry-specific business categories that are unique to or define your industry. See the slides immediately following this exercise for tips on developing these categories, as well as the appendix of this blueprint for some examples of industry-specific categories and definitions.
    3. Create "Business Other" and "Industry Other" categories to capture minor groups and activities supported by IT that fall beyond the major shared and industry-specific business functions you've shortlisted. Briefly note the business groups/activities that fall under these categories.
    4. Edit/enter your shared and industry-specific business function categories and their definitions on tab "2. Business View Definitions" in the IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook.

    Download the IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook

    2.3 Build your industry-specific business views

    InputOutput
    • Knowledge about your organization's structure and business functions/units
    • A list of major shared business functions and industry-specific business functions/capabilities that are defining of your industry
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Head of IT
    • IT financial lead

    Lock in key pieces of baseline data

    Calculating core IT spend metrics relies on a few key numbers. Settle these first based on known data before diving into detailed mapping.

    These baseline data will allow you to calculate high-level metrics like IT spend as a percent of revenue and year-over-year percent change in IT spend, as well as more granular metrics like IT staff spend per employee for a specific IT service.

    Baseline data checklist

    • IT spend analysis period (date range).
    • Currency used.
    • Organizational revenue.
    • Organizational OpEx.
    • Total current year IT spend.
    • Total current year IT CapEx and IT OpEx.
    • Total previous-year IT spend.
    • Total projected next-year IT spend.
    • Number of organizational employees.
    • Number of IT employees.

    You may have discovered some things you didn't know about during the mapping process. Revisit your baseline data when your mapping is complete and make adjustments where needed.

    2.4 Enter your baseline data

    Duration: One hour

    1. Navigate to tab "3. Baseline Data" in the IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook. Using the data you've gathered, enter the following information to set your baseline data for future calculations:
      1. Your IT spend analysis date range. This can be concrete dates, a fiscal year abbreviation, etc.
      2. The currency you will be using throughout the workbook. It's important that all monetary values entered are in the same currency.
      3. Your organization's total revenue and total operating expenditure (OpEx) for the spend analysis data range you've specified. Revenue includes all sources of funding/income.
      4. Your total IT OpEx and total IT capital expenditure (CapEx). The workbook will add your OpEx and CapEx values for you to arrive at a total IT spend value.
      5. Total IT spend for the year prior to the current IT spend analysis date range, as well as anticipated total IT spend for the year following.
      6. Total IT staff spend (salaries, benefits, training, travel, and fees for employees and contractors in a staff augmentation role) for the spend analysis date range.
      7. The total number of organizational employees and total number of IT employees. These are typically full-time equivalent (FTE) values and include contractors in a staff augmentation role.
    2. Make note of any issues that have influenced the values you entered.

    Download the IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook

    2.4 Enter your baseline data

    InputOutput
    • Cleaned and organized spend and staffing data and information
    • Finalized baseline data for deriving spend metrics
    MaterialsParticipants
    • IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook
    • Head of IT
    • IT financial lead

    Phase 2: Gather required data

    Achievement summary

    You've now completed all preparation steps for your IT spend transparency journey. You have:

    • Gathered your IT spend and staffing data and information.
    • Cleaned and organized your data to streamline mapping.
    • Identified your baseline data points.

    "As an IT person, you're not speaking the same language at all as the accounting department. There's almost always a session of education that's required first."
    - Angie Reynolds, Principal Research Director, ITFM Practice, Info-Tech Research Group

    Phase 3

    Map Your IT Staff Spend

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Mapping your IT staff spend across the four views of the ITFM Cost Model
    • Validating your mapping

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Head of IT
    • IT financial lead
    • Other members of IT management

    Phase 3: Map your IT staff spend

    Allocate your workforce costs across the four views.

    Now it's time to tackle the first part of your hands-on spend mapping effort, namely IT staff spend. In this phase you will:

    • Allocate your IT staff spend across the four views of the ITFM Cost Model.
    • Validate your mapping to ensure that it's accurate and complete.

    "We're working towards the truth. We know the answer, but it's how to get it. Take Data & BI. For some organizations, four FTEs is too many. Are these people really doing Data & BI? Look at the big picture and see if something's missing."
    - Rex Ding, Research Specialist, ITFM Practice, Info-Tech Research Group

    Staffing costs comprise a significant percent of OpEx

    Staffing is the first thing that comes to mind when it comes to spend. Intentionally bring it out of the shadows to promote constructive conversations.

    • Total staffing costs stand out from other IT spend line items. This is because they're comparatively large, often comprising 30-50% of total IT costs.
    • Standing out comes at a price. Staff costs are where business leadership looks first if they want cuts. If IT leadership doesn't bring forward ways to cut staffing costs as part of a broader cost-cutting mandate, it will be seen as ignorant of business priorities at best and outright insubordinate at worst.
    • Staffing costs as a percentage of total costs vary between IT functions. On the business side, there's a lack of understanding about what functions IT staff serve and support and the real-world costs of obtaining (and keeping) needed IT skills. For example, IT security staffing costs as a percentage of that service's total OpEx will likely be higher than service desk staff given the scarcity and higher market value of the former. Trimming 20% of IT staffing costs from the IT security function has much different implications than cutting 20% of service desk staffing costs.

    Staffing spend transparency can do a lot to change the conversation from one where the business thinks that IT management is just being self-protecting to one where they know that IT management is actually protecting the business.

    Demonstrating the legitimate reasons behind IT staff spend is critical in both rationalizing past and current spend decisions as well as informing future decisions.

    Info-Tech recommends that you map your IT staffing costs before all other IT costs

    Mapping your IT staffing spend first is a good idea because:

    • Staffing costs are usually documented more clearly, simply, and accurately than other IT costs.
    • Gathering all your IT staffing data is usually a one-stop shop (i.e. the HR department).
    • The comparative straightforwardness of mapping staff costs compared to other IT costs gives you the opportunity to:
      • Get familiar with the ITFM Cost Model views and categories.
      • Get the hang of the hands-on mapping process.
      • Determine the kinds of speed bumps and questions you'll encounter down the road when you tackle the more complicated mappings.

    "Some companies will say software developer. Others say application development specialist or engineer. What are these things? You have to have conversations ..."
    - Rex Ding, Research Specialist, ITFM Practice, Info-Tech Research Group

    Understand the CFO Expense View: "Workforce" categories defined

    For the staffing spend mapping exercise, we're defining the Workforce category here and will offer Vendor category definitions in the vendor spend mapping exercise later.

    Workforce: The total costs of employing labor in the IT organization. This includes all salary/wages, benefits, travel/training, dues and memberships, and contractor pay. Managed services expenses associated with an external service provider should be excluded from Workforce and included in Contract Services.

    Employee: A person employed by the IT organization on a permanent full-time or part-time basis. Costs include salary, benefits, training, travel and expenses, and professional dues and memberships. These relationships are managed under human resources and the bulk of spend transactions via payroll processes.

    Contractor: A person serving in a non-permanent staff augmentation role. These relationships are typically managed under procurement or finance and spend transactions handled via invoicing and accounts payable processes. Labor costs associated with an external service provider are excluded.

    CFO Expense View

    Mapping your IT staff across the CFO Expense View is relatively cut-and-dried

    The CFO Expense View is the most straightforward in terms of mapping IT staffing costs as it's made up of only two main categories: Workforce and Vendor.

    In the CFO Expense View, all IT spend on staffing is allocated to the Workforce bucket under either Employee or Contractor.

    What constitutes a Contractor can be confusing given increased use of long-term labor augmentation strategies, so being absolutely clear about this is imperative. For spend mapping purposes:

    • Any staff members under independent contract where individuals are paid directly by your organization as opposed to indirectly via a service provider (e.g. staffing firm) are considered Workforce > Contractor.
    • Any circumstances where you pay a third-party organization for labor is slotted under Vendor > Contract Services.

    CFO Expense View

    Understand the CIO Service View: Categories defined

    We've provided definitions for the major categories that require clarification.

    Applications Development: Purchase/development, testing, and deployment of application projects. Includes internally developed or packaged solutions.

    Applications Maintenance: Software maintenance fees or maintaining current application functionality along with minor enhancements.

    Hosting & Networks: Compute, storage, and network functionality for running/hosting applications and providing communications/connectivity for the organization.

    End User: Procurement, provision, management, and maintenance (break/fix) of end-user devices (desktop, laptops, tablets, peripherals, and phones) as well as purchase/support and use of productivity software on these devices. The IT service desk is included here as well.

    PPM & Projects: People, processes, and technologies dedicated to the management of IT projects and the IT project portfolio as a whole.

    Data & BI: Strategy and oversight of the technology used to support data warehousing, business intelligence, and analytics.

    IT Management: Senior IT leadership, IT finance, IT strategy and governance, enterprise architecture, process management, vendor management, talent management, and program and portfolio management oversight.

    Security: Information security strategy and oversight, practices, procedures, compliance, and risk mitigation to protect and prevent unauthorized access to organizational data and technology assets.

    CIO Service View

    Mapping your IT staff across the CIO Service View is a slightly harder exercise

    The complexity of mapping staff across this view depends on how your IT department is organized and the degree of role specialization vs. generalization.

    The CIO Service View mirrors how many IT departments are organized into teams or work groups. However, some partial percentage-based allocations are probably required, especially for smaller IT units with more generalized, cross-functional roles. For example:

    • A systems administrator's costs may need to be allocated 80% to Hosting & Networks and 20% to Security.
    • An app development team lead may spend about 40% of their time doing hands-on Development work and the other 60% on project management (i.e. PPM & Projects).

    Info-Tech has found that allocating staffing costs for Data & BI raises the most doubts as it can be very entangled with Applications and other spend. Do the best you can.

    Understand the CXO Expense View: Categories defined

    Expand shared services and industry function categories as suits your organization.

    Industry Functions: As listed and defined by you for your specific industry.

    Human Resources: IT staff and specific application functionality in support of organizational human resource management.

    Finance & Accounting: IT staff and specific application functionality in support of corporate finance and accounting.

    Shared Services Other: IT staff and specific application functionality in support of all other shared enterprise functions.

    Information Technology: IT staff and specific application functionality in support of IT performing its own internal IT operations functions.

    Industry Other: IT staff and specific application functionality in support of all other industry-specific functions.

    CXO Expense View

    Mapping your IT staff across the CXO Business View warrants the most time

    This view is probably the most difficult as many IT department roles are set up according to lines of IT service, not lines of business. Prepare to do a little math.

    The CXO Expense View also requires percentage-based splitting of role spend, but to a greater extent.

    • Start by mapping staff cost allocations for those roles that are at, or close to, 100% dedicated to a specific business function (if any).
    • For IT roles that support organization-wide or multi-department functions, knowing the percent of employees that work in each relevant business unit and parceling IT staff spend by those same percentages may be easiest. For example, a general systems administrator's costs could be allocated as 4% to HR, 2% to finance, 25% to sales, 20% to production operations, and so on based on the percentage of employees in each of the supported business units.

    Take a minute to figure out how you plan to map IT's indirect CXO Business View costs

    Direct IT costs are those that are dedicated to a specific business unit or user group, such a marketing campaign management app, specialized devices used by a specific subset of workers in the field, or a business analyst embedded full-time in a sales organization.

    VS

    Indirect IT costs are pretty much everything else that's shared broadly across the organization and can't be tied to just one stakeholder or user group, such as network infrastructure, the service desk, and office productivity apps. These costs must be fairly and evenly distributed.

    No indirect mapping method is perfect, but here's a suggestion:

    • Take the respective headcount of all business functions sharing the IT resource/service in question.
    • Calculate each business function's staff as a percentage of all organizational staff.
    • Use this same percent of staff to calculate and allocate a business function's indirect staff and indirect vendor costs.

    "There is always a conversation about indirect allocations. There's never been an organization I've heard of or worked for which has been able to allocate every technology cost directly to a business consumption or business unit."
    Monica Braun, ITFM Research Director, Info-Tech Research Group

    Example:

    • A company of 560 employees has six HR staff (about 1.1% of total staff).
    • Network admin staffing costs $143,000, so $1,573 (1.1%) would be allocated to HR.
    • Internet services cost $40,000, so $440 (1.1%) would be allocated to HR.

    Some indirect costs are shared by multiple business functions, but not all. In these cases, exclude non-participating business functions from the total number of organizational employees and re-calculate a new percent of staff for each participating business function.

    Know where you're most likely to encounter direct vs. indirect IT staffing costs

    Info-Tech has found that direct vs. indirect staffing spend is more commonly found in some areas than others. Use this insight to focus your work.

    Direct IT staffing spend

    Definition: Individuals or teams whose total time is formally dedicated to the support of one business unit/function.

    • Data & BI (direct to one non-IT unit)
    • IT Management (direct to IT)
      • Service planning & Architecture
      • Strategy & Governance
      • Financial Management
      • People & Resources

    Hybrid IT staffing spend

    Definition: Teams with a percent of time or entire FTEs formally dedicated to one business unit/function while the remainder of the time or team is generalized.

    • Applications
      • Applications Development
      • Applications Maintenance
    • IT Management
      • PPM & Projects

    Indirect IT staffing spend

    Definition: Individuals or teams whose total time is generalized to the support of multiple or all business units or functions.

    • Infrastructure
      • Hosting & Networks
      • End Users
    • Security

    Indirect staff spend only comes into play in the CXO Business View. Thoroughly map the CIO Service View first and leverage its outcomes to inform your allocations to individual business and industry functions.

    Understand the CEO Innovation View: Categories defined

    Be particularly clear on your understanding of the difference between business growth and business innovation.

    Business Innovation: IT spend/ activities focused on the development of new business capability, new products and services, and/or introduction of existing products/ services into new markets. It does not include expansion or update of existing capabilities.

    Business Growth: IT spend/activities focused on the expansion, scaling, or modernization of an existing business capability, product/service, or market. This is specifically related to growth within a current market.

    Keep the Lights On: IT spend/activities focused on keeping the organization running on a day-to-day basis. This includes all activities used to ensure the smooth operation of business functions and overall business continuity.

    CEO Innovation View

    Important Note

    Info-Tech analysts often skip mapping staff for the CEO Innovation View when delivering the IT Spend & Staffing Benchmarking Service.

    This is because, for many organizations, either most IT staff spend is allocated to Keep the Lights On or any IT staff allocation to Business Growth and Business Innovation activities is untracked, undocumented, and difficult to parse out.

    Mapping your IT staff across the CEO Innovation View is largely straightforward

    Clear divisions between CapEx and OpEx can be your friend when it comes to mapping this view. Focus your efforts on parsing growth vs. innovation.

    • The majority of IT staff costs are OpEx: And the majority of OpEx will land in the Keep the Lights On category. This is a comparatively simple mapping exercise. Know in advance that this will be the largest of the three buckets in the CEO Innovation View by a very wide margin, so don't be surprised if over 90% of IT staffing costs end up here.
    • Most of the remaining IT staff costs will be tied to capital projects and investments: This means that they will land in either Business Growth or Business Innovation, with the majority typically sitting under Business Growth. Again, don't be surprised if the Business Innovation category holds less than 3% of total IT staffing spend.

    Take your IT staff spend mapping to the next level with detailed time and headcount data

    Overlay a broader assessment of your IT staff

    Info-Tech's IT Staffing Assessment diagnostic can expand your view of what's really happening on the staffing front.

    • Learn your true distribution of IT staff across the same IT services listed in the ITFM Cost Model's CIO Service View.
    • Get other metrics such as degrees of seniority, manager span of control, and IT staff perception of their effectiveness.

    Take action

    1. Set it up: Contact your Info-Tech Account Manager and sign your team up to take the diagnostic.
    2. Assess the findings: Review the output report, specifically how your staff says they spend their time versus what your organization chart's been telling you.
    3. Apply the percentages: Use the FTE allocation percentages in the output report to guide how you distribute your staff spend across the CIO Service View.
    4. Expand your analysis: Use your staff's feedback around perceived aids and obstacles to effectiveness in order to inform and defend your recommendations and decisions on how IT funds should be spent.

    Consider these final tips for mapping your IT staffing costs before diving in

    Mapping your IT staffing costs definitely requires some work. However, knowing the common stumbling blocks and being systematic will yield the best results.

    Approach: Be efficient to be effective

    Start with what you know best: Map the CFO Expense View first to plug in information you already have. Next, map the CIO Service View since it's most aligned to your organization chart.

    Keep a list of questions: You'll need to seek clarifications. Note your questions, but don't reach out until you've done a first pass at the mapping - don't annoy people with a barrage of questions.

    Delegate: Your managers and leads have a more accurate view of exactly what their staff do. Consider delegating the CIO Service View and CXO Business View to them or turn the mapping exercise into a series of collaborative leadership team activities.

    Biggest challenge: Role/title ambiguity

    • The Business Analyst role is often vague. These staffers are often jacks-of-all-trades in IT. You probably can't rely on a generic job description to figure out exactly which services and business functions BAs are spending their time on. Plan to ask a lot of questions.
    • Other role titles may be completely inaccurate. Is the word "system" referring to apps, infrastructure, or both? Is the user experience specialist actually a programmer? Is a manager really managing anything? Know your organization's tendencies around meaningful job titling and set your workload expectations accordingly.

    Key step - validate! If you see services or functions with low or no allocation, or something just doesn't look right, investigate. Someone's doing that work - take the time to figure out who.

    3.1 Map your IT staffing costs

    Duration: Variable

    1. Navigate to tab "4. Staff Spend Mapping" in the IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook. On one row, enter the name of an individual or group to be mapped, their role/title (if an individual), and their total known cost as per your collected data.
    2. Under the CFO Expense View (columns F-G), enter the number of FTEs represented by the individual or group named and their status (i.e. Employee or Contractor).
    3. Under the CIO Service View (columns L-AF), allocate the individual or group's spend as a percentage across all service categories. If the allocation for a service is 0%, leave the cell blank.
    4. Under the CXO Business View (columns AI-BA), allocate the individual or group's spend as a percentage across all business function and industry-specific function categories. If the allocation for a function is 0%, leave the cell blank.
    5. Under the CEO Innovation View (columns BD-BH), allocate the individual or group's spend as a percentage across Business Innovation, Business Growth, and Keep the Lights On. If the allocation for an investment type is 0%, leave the cell blank.
    6. Repeat steps 2 to 5 for all other IT staff (as individuals or groups).
    7. Follow up on and resolve any additional inquiries you need to make based on questions that arose during the mapping process.
    8. Validate your mapping by:
      1. Identifying spend categories that have zero staff spend allocation. Additional percentage allocation splits for certain roles are probably required.
      2. Investigating spend categories that seem to have very high or very low spend allocations based on a gut check. Again, double-check your percentage allocation splits.
      3. Ensuring your amounts add up to your previously calculated total IT staff spend. A balance tracker is provided on tab "6. Tracker & General Outputs" of the IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook.

    Download the IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook

    3.1 Map your staffing costs

    Input Output
    • Cleaned and organized IT staffing data and information
    • Finalized mapping of IT staff spend across the four views of the ITFM Cost Model
    Materials Participants
    • IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook
    • Head of IT
    • IT financial lead
    • Other IT management as required

    Phase 3: Map your IT staff spend

    Achievement summary

    You've now completed your IT staff spend mapping. You have:

    • Allocated your IT staff spend across the four views of the ITFM Cost Model.
    • Validated your mapping to ensure it's accurate and complete.

    "Some want to allocate everybody to IT, but that's not how we do it. [In one CXO Business View mapping], a client allocated all their sand network people to the IT department. At the end of the process, the IT department itself accounted for 20% of total IT spend. We went back and reallocated those indirect staff costs across the business."
    - Kennedy Confurius, Research Analyst, ITFM Practice, Info-Tech Research Group

    Phase 4

    Map Your IT Vendor Spend

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Mapping your IT vendor spend across the four views of the ITFM Cost Model
    • Validating your mapping

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Head of IT
    • IT financial lead
    • Other members of IT management

    Phase 4: Map your IT vendor spend

    Allocate your vendor costs across the four views.

    Now you're ready to take on the second part of your spend mapping, namely IT vendor spend. In this phase you will:

    • Allocate your IT vendor spend across the four views of the ITFM Cost Model.
    • Validate your mapping to ensure it's accurate and complete.

    "[One CIO] said that all technology spend runs through their IT group. But they didn't have hardware in their financial data file - no cellphones or laptops, no network or server expenses. They thought they had everything, but they didn't know what they didn't have. Assume it's out there somewhere."
    - Kennedy Confurius, Research Analyst, ITFM Practice, Info-Tech Research Group

    Tackle the non-staff side of IT spend

    Info-Tech analysts find that mapping the IT vendor spend data is harder because the source data is often scattered and not meaningfully labeled.

    • Be patient and systematic. As with mapping your IT staff spend data, the more organized you are from the outset and the more thoroughly you've prepared your data, the more straightforward the exercise will be.
      • Did you "un-unique" your data? If not, do that now before attempting mapping.
    • Get comfortable with making some assumptions. You need to get through the exercise, so sometimes making a best guess and entering a value is better than diving down a rabbit hole. Your gut is probably right anyway. But only make assumptions around smaller line items that don't have a massive impact on your final numbers. Never assume anything when it comes to big-ticket items.
    • Curb your urge to fix. Some of your buckets will start to get big, while others will barely budge. This is normal ... and interesting! Resist the urge to "balance" staffing spend in a bucket by loading it with apps and hardware for fear that the staffing spend looks too high and will be questioned. This exercise is about how things are, not how they look.

    "A common financial data problem is no vendor names. I've noticed that, even if the vendor name is there, there are no descriptors. You cannot actually tell what type of service it is. Data security? Infrastructure? Networking? Ask yourself 'What did we purchase and what does it do?'"
    - Aman Kumari, Research Specialist, ITFM Practice, Info-Tech Research Group

    Understand the CFO Expense View: Vendor categories defined

    These are the final definitions for this view. See the previous section for CFO Expense View > Workforce definitions used in the IT staffing cost mapping exercise.

    Vendor: Provider of a good or service in exchange for payment.

    Hardware: Costs of procuring, maintaining, and managing all IT hardware, including end-user devices, data center and networking equipment, cabling, and hybrid appliances for both on-premises and cloud-based providers.

    Software: Costs for all software (applications, database, middleware, utilities, tools) used across the organization. This includes purchase, maintenance, and licensing costs.

    Contract Services: Costs for all third-party services including managed service providers, consultants, and advisory services.

    Cloud: Offsite hosting and delivery of an on-demand software or hardware computing function by a third-party provider, often on a subscription-type basis.

    On-Prem: On-site hosting and delivery of a software or hardware computing function, often requiring upfront purchase cost and subsequent maintenance costs.

    Managed Services: Costs for outsourcing the provision and maintenance of a technical process or function.

    Consulting & Advisory: Costs for the third-party provision of professional or technical advice and expertise.

    CFO Expense View

    Know if a technology is cloud-based or on-premises before mapping

    A technology may be one, the other, or both if multiple versions are in play. Financial records rarely indicate which, but on-premises vs. cloud matters in your planning.

    On-Premises

    • Check your CapEx. Any net-new purchases of software or hardware for the IT spend analysis year in question should appear on the CapEx side of the equation. After the first year of implementation/rollout, all ongoing maintenance and management costs should be found under OpEx.
    • Focus on real in-year costs.
      • Don't try to map depreciation or amortization associated with CapEX. Instead, map any upfront purchase costs that occurred in the relevant IT spend analysis year.
      • Map any OpEX costs incurred from maintenance and management. For multi-year maintenance contracts, apply the percentage of fees paid for the relevant year.

    Cloud

    • Check your OpEx. Cloud services are typically fee-based, which means the costs often come in the form of regularly timed bills akin to a subscription.
    • Differentiate new services from older ones. If the cloud service was initiated during the IT spend analysis year in question, there may be some one-time service setup and initiation fees that were legitimately slotted under CapEx. If the cloud service isn't new, then all costs should be OpEx.

    Vendors are increasingly "retiring" on-premises software products. This means an older version may be on-prem, a newer one cloud, and you may have both in play.

    Mapping built-in data, analytics, and security functions can raise doubts

    With so many apps focused on capturing, manipulating, and protecting data, built-in analytics, reporting, and security functions blur CIO Service View bucket boundaries.

    Applications vs. Data & BI

    • In recent years, much more powerful analysis and report-generation features have been added to core enterprise applications. If analytics and reporting functionality is an extended feature of a database-driven application, such as ERP or CRM, then map it to one of the Applications buckets.
    • If the sole purpose of the application is to store, manipulate, query, analyze, and/or visualize data, then log its costs under Data & BI. These would include technologies such as data warehouses, marts, cubes, and lakes; desktop data visualization tools; enterprise business intelligence platforms; and specialized reporting tools.

    Applications vs. Security

    • A similar conundrum exists for Security. So many tools today have built-in security functionality that cannot be unintegrated from the app they support. Don't even try to isolate native security functionality for spend mapping purposes - map it to Applications.
    • If the tool is a special-purpose, standalone security tool or security platform, then map it to Security. These tools usually sit within, and are used/managed by, IT. They include firewalls; antivirus/anti-malware; intrusion prevention, detection and response; access control and authentication; encryption; and penetration testing and vulnerability assessment.

    Putting spend in the right bucket does matter. However, if uncertainty persists, err on the side of consistency. For most organizations Applications Maintenance does end up being the biggest bucket.

    When mapping the CXO Business View, do the biggest vendors first

    Below is a suggested order of operations to clear through the majority of vendor spend as early as possible in the process.

    1 Sort high to low Sort your list of vendor spend from highest to lowest. Your top 20 vendors should constitute most of the spend.
    2 Map multi-department enterprise apps Flag your top apps vendors that have presence in most or all of your business units. Map these first. These tend to be enterprise-level business apps "owned" by core business functions but used broadly across the organization such as enterprise resource planning (ERP), customer relationship management (CRM), and people management systems.
    3 Map end-user spend Identify top vendors of general end-user technologies like office productivity apps, desktop hardware, and IT service desk tools. Allocate percentages according to your selected indirect spend mapping method.
    4 Map core infrastructure spend Map the behind-the-scenes network, telecom, and data center technologies that underpin IT, plus any infrastructure managed services. Again, apply your selected indirect spend mapping method.
    5 Map business-unit specific technologies This is the spend that's often incurred by just one department. This may also be technology spend that's out in the business, not in IT proper. Map it to the right business function or put it in Business Other or Industry Other if the business function doesn't have its own bucket.
    6 Map the miscellaneous Only smaller spend items likely remain at this point. When in doubt, map them to either Business Other or Industry Other.

    After mapping the CXO Business View, your Other buckets might be getting a bit big

    It's common for the Business Other and Industry Other categories to be quite large, and even the largest. This is okay, but plan to dig deeper and understand why.

    Remember "when in doubt, map to either the Business Other or Industry Other category"? Know what large Other buckets might really be telling you. After your first pass at mapping the CXO Business View, review Business Other and Industry Other if either is more than about 10% of your total spend.
    Diversification: Your organization has a wide array of business functions and/or associated staff that exist outside the core business and industry-specific categories selected. Are there minor business functions that can reasonably be included with the core categories identified? If not, don't force it. Better to keep your core buckets clean and uncomplicated.
    Non-core monolith: There's a significant technology installation outside the core that's associated with a comparatively minor business function. Is there a business function incurring substantial technology spend that should probably be broken out on its own and added to the core? If so, do it. Spend is unlikely to get smaller as the organization grows, so best to shine a light on it now.
    Shadow IT: There's significant technology spend in several areas of the organization that is unowned, unmanaged, or serving an unknown purpose as far as IT is concerned. Is a lot of the spend non-IT technology in the business? If yes, flag it and plan to learn more. It's likely that technologies living elsewhere in the organization will become IT concerns eventually. Better to be ready than to be surprised.

    As with staffing, CapEx vs. OpEx helps map the CEO Innovation View

    Mapping to this view was optional for IT staffing. For hard technology vendor spend, mapping this view is key. Use the guidance below to determine what goes where.

    Keep the Lights On
    Spend usually triggered by a service deck ticket or work order, not a formal project. Includes:

    • Daily maintenance and management.
    • Repair or upgrade of existing technology to preserve business function/continuity.
    • Purchase of "commodity" technology, such as standard-issue laptops and licenses for office productivity software.

    Business Growth
    Spend usually in the context of a formal project under a CapEx umbrella. Includes:

    • Technology spend that directly supports business expansion of an existing product or service and/or market.
    • Modernizing existing technology.
    • Extension of, or investment in, existing infrastructure to ensure reliability and availability in response to growth-driven scaling of headcount and utilization.

    Business Innovation
    Spend is always in the context of a formal project and should be 100% CapEx in the first year after purchase. Includes:

    • Technology spend that directly supports development and rollout of new products or service and/or entry into new markets.
    • Use of existing technology or investment in net-new technology in direct support of a new business initiative, direction, or requirement.

    In many organizations, most technology spend will be allocated to Keep the Lights On. This is normal but should generate conversations with the business about redirecting funds to growth and innovation.

    Remember these top tips when mapping your technology vendor spend

    The benefits of having tidy and organized data can't be overstated, as your source data will be in a more varied state for this phase of the mapping than with IT staffing data.

    Approach: Move from macro to micro

    • Start with the big enterprise apps: These will probably be in the top five of your vendor spend list and will likely have good info about how and by whom they're used. Get them out of the way.
    • Clear out shared technologies. This will feature infrastructure and operations plus office productivity and communications spend. Portioning spend by department headcount for the CXO Business View is the hardest part. Get this forklift task out of the way too.
    • Don't sweat the small stuff. Wasting hours chasing the details of a $500 line item isn't worth it when you have five-, six-, or even seven-figure line items to map.

    Biggest challenge: Poor vendor labeling

    • Vendor labels are often an inconsistent mess or missing entirely. Standardize and apply consistent vendor labels throughout your data so that you can aggregate your data into a workable form.
    • Spend transactions with the same vendor can be scattered all over the place in your general ledger. Take the time to "un-unique" your data to save yourself tremendous grief later on.
    • Start new go-forward labeling habits. Talk to finance about your new list of vendor naming standards and tagging spend as on-prem or cloud. Getting their cooperation with these are major wins.

    Key step - validate! If you see services or functions with low or no allocation, or something just doesn't look right, investigate. There's probably a technology out there in the business doing that work.

    4.1 Map your IT vendor spend

    Duration: Variable

    1. Navigate to tab "5. Vendor Spend Mapping" in the IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook. On one row, enter a spend line item (vendor, product, etc.), a brief description, and the known amount of spend.
    2. Under the CFO Expense View (columns F-P), allocate the line item's spend as a percentage across all asset-class categories. If the allocation for a line item is 0%, leave the cell blank.
    3. Under the CIO Service View (columns S-AM), allocate the line item's spend as a percentage across all service categories. If the allocation for a service is 0%, leave the cell blank.
    4. Under the CXO Business View (columns AP-BH), allocate the line item's spend as a percentage across all business function and industry-specific function categories. If the allocation for a function is 0%, leave the cell blank.
    5. Under the CEO Innovation View (columns BK-BO), allocate the line item's spend as a percentage across Business Innovation, Business Growth, and Keep the Lights On. If the allocation for an investment type is 0%, leave the cell blank.
    6. Repeat steps 2-5 for all spend line items.
    7. Follow up on and resolve any additional inquiries you need to make based on questions that arose during the mapping process.
    8. Validate your mapping by:
      1. Ensuring your amounts add up to your previously calculated total IT vendor spend. A balance tracker is provided on tab "6. Tracker & General Outputs" of the IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook.
      2. Identifying spend categories that have zero spend allocation. Additional percentage allocation splits for certain line items are probably required.
      3. Investigating spend categories that seem to have very high or very low spend allocations based on a gut check. Again, double-check your percentage allocation splits.

    Download the IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook

    4.1 Map your IT vendor spend

    InputOutput
    • Cleaned and organized IT vendor spend data and information
    • Finalized mapping of IT vendor spend across the four views of the IT Cost Model
    MaterialsParticipants
    • IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook
    • Head of IT
    • IT financial lead
    • Other IT management as required

    Phase 4: Map your IT vendor spend

    Achievement summary

    You've now completed your IT vendor spend mapping. You have:

    • Allocated your IT vendor spend across the four views of the ITFM Cost Model.
    • Validated your mapping to ensure it's accurate and complete.

    "A lot of organizations log their spending by vendor name with no description of the goods or services they actually purchased from the vendor. It could be hardware, software, consulting services ... anything. Having a clear understanding of what's really in there is an essential aspect of the spend conversation."
    - Rex Ding, Research Specialist, ITFM Practice, Info-Tech Research Group

    Phase 5

    Identify Implications for IT

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Analyzing the results of your IT staff and vendor spend mapping across the four views of the ITFM Cost Model
    • Preparing an executive presentation of your transparent IT spend

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Head of IT
    • IT financial lead
    • Other members of IT management

    Phase 5: Identify implications for IT

    Analyze and communicate.

    You're now nearing the end of the first leg in your IT spend transparency journey. In this phase you will:

    • Analyze the results of your IT spend mapping process.
    • Revisit your transparency objectives.
    • Prepare an executive presentation so you can share findings with other leaders in your organization.

    "Don't plug in numbers just to make yourself look good or please someone else. The only way to improve is to look at real life."
    - Monica Braun, Research Director, ITFM Practice, Info-Tech Research Group

    You've mapped your IT spend data. Now what?

    With mapped data in hand, now you can start to tell IT's spend story with stakeholders in the business.

    Mapping your IT spend is a lot of work, but what you've achieved is impressive (applause!) as well as essential for growing your ITFM maturity. Now put your hard work to work.

    • Consider benchmarking. While not covered in-depth here, benchmarking against yourself in a year-over-year approach as well as against external industry peers are very useful exercises in your technology spend analysis.
    • Review your numbers and graphs. Your IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook contains a series of data visualizations that will help you see the big picture as well as relationships between spend categories.
    • Note the very big numbers, the very small numbers, and the things that just look odd. You'll want to investigate and understand these further.
    • Prepare to communicate. Facilitating conversations with stakeholders in the business is the immediate objective of the IT spend and staffing transparency exercise. Decide where and with whom you want to start dialogue.

    The slides that follow show sample data summaries and visualizations generated in the IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook. We'll take a look at the metrics, tables, and graphs you now have available to you post-mapping and how you can potentially use them in conversations with different IT stakeholders.

    Evaluate how you might use benchmarks before diving into your analysis

    Benchmarking can be a useful input for contextualizing and interpreting your IT spend data. It's not essential at this point but should be part of your ITFM toolkit.

    There are two basic types of benchmarking ...

    Internal: Capturing a current-state set of data about an in-house operation to serve as a baseline. Over time, snapshots of the same data are taken and compared to the baseline to track and assess changes. Common uses for internal benchmarking include:

    • Assessing the impact of a project or initiative.
    • Measuring year-over-year performance.

    External: Seeking out aggregated, current-state data about a peer-group operation to assess your own relative status or performance on the same operation. Common uses for external benchmarking include:

    • Understanding common practices in the industry.
    • Strategic and operational visioning, planning, and goal-setting.
    • Putting together a business case for change or investment.

    Both types of benchmarking benefit from some formality and rigor. Info-Tech can help you stand up an ITFM benchmarking approach as well as connect you with actual IT spend peer benchmarks via our IT Spend & Staffing Benchmarking service.

    5.1 Analyze the results of your IT spend mapping

    Duration: Variable

    1. Review the guidance slides that follow the two instruction slides for this exercise to provide yourself with a grounding on how to interpret and analyze your mapped IT staff and vendor spend data.
    2. Systematically review the data tables and graphs on the "Outputs" tabs 6 through 10 in the IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook. There are several approaches you can take - use the one that works best for you. For example:
      1. Review each view in its entirety, one at a time.
      2. Review all workforce spend collectively across all four views, followed by all vendor spend across all four views (or vice versa).
    3. Make note of any spend values that are comparatively high or low or strike you as odd or worth further investigation.
    4. Craft a series of spend-related questions you want to answer for yourself and your stakeholders using the data.
      1. For example, you need to cut costs and apps maintenance is high. Your question could be, "Can we cut costs on applications maintenance staffing?"
      2. Alternatively, you can develop a series of statements (research hypotheses) that you seek to prove true or false with the data. This approach is useful for testing assumptions you've been making. For example, "We can cut spending on applications maintenance staff. True or false?"
    5. Use the template provided on tab "11. Data Analysis" in the IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook to document your findings and conclusions, along with the data that supports them.

    Download the IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook

    5.1 Analyze the results of your IT spend mapping

    InputOutput
    • Tabular and graphical data outputs
    • Conclusions and potential actions about IT staff and vendor spend
    MaterialsParticipants
    • IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook
    • Head of IT
    • IT financial lead
    • Other IT management as required

    High-level findings: Use these IT spend metrics to review and set big picture goals

    Think of these metrics as key anchors in your long-term strategic planning efforts.

    Use IT spend metrics to review and set big goals

    It's common for the business to want a sacrifice in IT OpEx in favor of CapEx

    CapEx and OpEx approval mechanisms are often entirely separate. Different tax treatment for CapEx means that it's usually preferred by the business over OpEx.

    OpEx is often seen as a sunk cost (i.e. an IT problem).

    • Barring a major decision or event, OpEx on an individual item will generally trend upward over time, often by a few percent every year, in lockstep with inflation and growth in organizational headcount.
    • A good portion of OpEx, however, is necessary for basic business continuity.

    CapEx is usually seen as investment (i.e. a business growth opportunity).

    • CapEx behaves quite differently than OpEx. On-the-books capitalized spend on an individual asset tends to trend downward over time due to depreciation or amortization.
    • CapEx only tends to go up when a net-new capital project is initiated, and organizations often have more control over if, when, and how this spend happens.

    Break down the OpEx/CapEx wall. Reference OpEx whenever you talk about CapEx. The best way to do this is via Total Cost of Ownership (TCO).

    • Present data on long-term OpEx projections whenever a new capital project is proposed and ensure ongoing maintenance funds are secured.
    • Educate your CFO about the impact of the cloud on OpEx. See if internal OpEx/CapEx ratio expectations can be adjusted to reflect this reality.

    Spend by asset class offers the CFO a visual illustration of where the money's really gone

    The major spend categories should look very familiar to your CFO. It's the minor sub-categories that sit underneath where you ultimately want to drive the conversation.

    Traditional categories don't reflect IT reality anymore.

    • Most finance departments have "software" accounts that contain apples and oranges, plus other dissimilar fruit.
    • Software isn't just software anymore. Now it's on-premises (CapEx) or cloud (OpEx). The same distinction applies to traditional hardware due to the advent of managed services.
    • The basic categories traditionally used to tag IT spend are out of date. This makes it hard for IT to have meaningful conversations with the CFO since they're not working from the same glossary.

    "Software (on-premises)" and "hardware (cloud)" are more meaningful descriptors than "software" and "hardware." Shift the dialogue.

    Start the migration from major categories to minor categories.

    • Still give the CFO the traditional major categories they're looking for but start including minor category breakdowns into your communications. Most importantly, have a meeting to explain what these minor categories are and why they're important to managing IT effectively.
    • Next, see if the CFO can formally split on-premises vs. cloud software on the books as a first step in making IT spend tracking more meaningful.

    Employees vs. contractors warrants a specific conversation, plus a change in mindset

    IT leaders often find it easier to get approval for contracted labor than to hire a permanent employee. However, the true value proposition for contractors does vary.

    The decision to go with permanent employees or contractors depends on your ultimate goals.

    • Contractors tend to be less expensive and provide more flexibility when adjusting to changing business needs. However, contractors may be less dedicated and take their skills and knowledge with them when they leave.
    • Permanent employees bring additional costs like benefits and training. Plus, letting them go is a lot more complicated. However, they can also bring real value in a way a contractor can't when it comes to sustaining long-term strategic growth. They're assets in themselves.

    Far too often, labor-sourcing decisions are driven by controlling near-term costs instead of generating and sustaining long-term value.

    Introduce the cost-to-value ratio to your workforce spend conversations.

    • Your mapped data will allow you to talk about comparative headcount and spend. This is a financial conversation devoid of context.
    • Go beyond. Show how workforce spend has allowed stated goals to be achieved while controlling for costs. This is the true definition of value.

    CFO Expense View: Shift the ITFM conversation

    Now that you've mapped your IT spend data to the CFO Expense View, there are some questions you're better equipped to answer, namely:

    • How should I classify my IT costs?
    • What information should I include in my plans and reports?
    • How do I justify current spend?
    • How do I justify a budget increase?

    You now have:

    • A starting point for educating the CFO about IT spend realities.
    • A foundation for creating a shared glossary of terms that works for both IT and the finance department and facilitates more meaningful conversations.
    • Proof that there are major areas of IT spend, such as cloud software, that are distinctive and probably warrant their own financial category in the general ledger.
    • A transparent record of IT spend that shows that you understand and care about financial issues, fostering the goodwill and trust that facilitates investment in IT.
    • A starting point to change the ITFM conversation with the CFO from one focused on cost to one focused on value.

    Exactly how is IT spending all that money we give them?

    Exactly like this ...

    Chart of the CFO Expense View

    The CIO Service View aligns with how IT organizes and manages itself – this is your view

    The data mapped here is a critical input for IT's service planning and management program and should be integrated into your IT performance measurement activities.

    Major service categories: These values give a high-level snapshot of your general IT service spend priorities. In most organizations, Applications dominates, making it a focus for cost optimization.

    Minor service categories: The level of granularity for these values prove more practical when measuring performance and making service management decisions - not too big, not too small. While not reflected in this example, application maintenance is usually the largest relative consumer of IT spend in most organizations.

    Data & BI and security: Isolating the exact spend for these services is challenging given that they're often entangled in applications and infrastructure spend respectively, and separate spend tracking for both is a comparatively recent practice.

    Table of CIO Service View

    Check the alignment of individual service spend against known business objectives

    Some IT services are taken for granted by the business, while others are virtually invisible. This lack of visibility often translates into funding misalignments.

    Is the amount of spend on a given service in parallel with the service's overall importance?

    • Though often unstated, ensuring continuity of basic business operations is always the top priority. This means business apps, core infrastructure, end users, and security need to be appropriately funded - these should collectively comprise the majority of IT service spend.
    • Strategy-supporting IT services, like data & BI, see high investment variability between organizations. If its strategic role/importance doesn't align with spend, flag it as an issue you'll need to reconcile with the business by increasing funding (important) or reducing service levels (unimportant).
    • The strategic importance of IT as a whole is often reflected in the spend on IT management services. If spend is low, IT's probably seen as a support function, not a strategic one.

    Identify the hot spots and pick your battles.

    • Spend levels are just approximate gauges of where and how the business is willing to spend its money. Start with this simple gut check.
    • Noting the areas of importance vs. spend misalignment will help you identify where negotiations with the business should probably happen.

    A mature IT cost optimization practice is often approached from the service perspective

    When optimizing IT costs, you have two OpEx levers to pull - vendor spend and staff spend. Isolating these two sources of IT service spend will help shortlist your options.

    It's all about how much room you have to move.

    • Any decision made about how a service is provisioned will push vendor and staff spend in clear, predictable, and often opposite directions (e.g. in-house and people-intensive services tend to see higher staff spend, while outsourced and tech-intensive services higher vendor spend).
    • Service levels required by the business should be the driving factor behind service design and spend decisions. High service spend may reflect priority but may also indicate it's over-built and is ripe for a cost-optimization treatment.
    • Service spend is a useful barometer for tracking the financial impact of any changes made to IT. Add simple unit-cost metrics like "service spend per organizational employee" and "service spend per FTE assigned to the service" to see if and how the dial has moved over time.

    Grow your IT service management practice.

    • The real power of the CIO Service View is laying the groundwork for next-level IT service management initiatives like developing a service catalog, negotiating service-level agreements, rolling out chargeback and showback mechanisms, and calculating IT's value to the business.
    • Use service spend as a common denominator for both your IT service management and IT performance management programs. Better yet, integrate the two programs to ensure a single version of the truth.

    CIO Service View: Optimize your cost-to-value ratio

    Now that you've mapped your IT spend data to the CIO Service View, there are some questions you're better equipped to answer, namely:

    • What's the impact of cloud adoption on speed of delivery?
    • Where can I improve spend efficiency?
    • Is my support model optimized?
    • How does our spend compare to others?

    You now have:

    • Data that shows the financial impact of change decisions on service costs.
    • Insight into the relationship between vendor spend and staff spend within a given IT service.
    • The information you need to start developing service unit costing mechanisms.
    • A tool for setting and right-sizing service-level agreements with the business.
    • A more focused starting point for investigating IT cost-optimization opportunities.
    • A baseline for benchmarking common IT services against your peers.

    Does the amount we spend on each IT service make sense?

    We have some good opportunities for optimization ...

    Chart of CIO Service View

    The CXO Business View will spur conversations that may have never happened before

    This view is a potential game changer as previously unknown technology spend is often revealed, triggering change in IT's relationship with business unit leaders.

    Table of CXO Business View

    The big beneficiaries of IT spend will leap out

    The CXO Business View mapping does have a "shock and awe" quality to it given large spend disparities. They may be totally legitimate, but they're still eye-catching.

    Share information, don't push recommendations.

    • Have a series of one-on-one meetings with business unit leaders to present these numbers.
      • Approach initial meetings as information-sharing sessions only. The data is probably new to them, and they'll need time to reflect and ask questions.
      • Bring a list of the big-ticket spend items for that business unit to focus the conversation.
    • Present these numbers at a broader leadership meeting.
      • It's critical for everyone to hear the same truth and learn about each other's technology needs and uses.
      • This is where recommendations for better aligning IT spend with business goals and cost-optimization strategies should surface. A group approach will bring technology haves and have-nots into the open, as well as provide a forum for collaborative solutioning.

    If possible, slice the numbers by business unit headcount.

    • IT spend per business unit employee is an attention-getting metric that can help gain entry to important conversations.
    • Comparing per-employee spend across different business functions is not necessarily an apples-to-apples comparison, as units like HR may have few employees but serve the entire organization. Bring up these kinds of differences to provide context and avoid misinterpretations.

    Questions will arise in how you calculated and allocated indirect IT spend

    IT spend for things like core infrastructure and end-user services must be distributed fairly across multiple or all business units. Be prepared to explain your methods.

    Be transparent in your transparency.

    • Distributing indirect spend is imprecise by nature. You can't account for every unique circumstance. However, you can devise a logic-driven, general approach that's defensible, fair, and works for most people most of the time.
    • Lay out your assumptions from the start. This is an important part of communicating transparently and can prevent unwanted descent into weedy rabbit holes.
      • List what you classified as indirect spend. Use the CFO Expense View and/or CIO Service View categories to aid your presentation of this information.
      • Point out known circumstances that didn't fit your general allocation method and how you handled them. Opting to ignore minor anomalies is reasonable but be sure to tell business unit leaders you did this and why.

    Use questions about indirect IT staff spend distribution to engage stakeholders.

    • As a percentage, the indirect IT staff spend allocation to a specific business unit may be higher than that for IT vendor spend since IT staff tend to operate more generally than the technologies they support.
    • Leverage any pushback about indirect spend as an opportunity to engage the broader business leadership group. Let them arrive at a consensus of how they want it done and confirm buy-in.

    CXO Business View: Bring the truth to light

    Now that you've mapped your IT spend data to the CXO Business View, there are some questions you're better equipped to answer, namely:

    • Which business units consume the most IT resources?
    • Which business units are underserved by IT?
    • How do I best communicate spend data internally?
    • Where do I need better business sponsorship for IT projects?

    You now have:

    • A reason-based accounting of direct and indirect amounts spent on IT vendors and staff in support of each major business unit.
    • Insight into the technology haves and have-nots in your organization and where opportunities to optimize costs may exist.
    • Attention-getting numbers that will help you engage business-unit leaders in meaningful conversations about their use of IT resources and the value they receive.
    • A mechanism to assess if a business unit's consumption of IT is appropriate and aligned with its purpose and mandate in the organization.
    • A list of previously unknown business-side technologies that IT will investigate further.

    Why doesn't my business unit get more support from IT?

    Let's look at how you compare to the other departments ...

    Chart of the CXO Business View

    From the CEO's high-level perspective, IT spend is a collection of distinct financial islands

    From IT's perspective, these islands are intimately connected, with events on one affecting what happens (or doesn't) on another. Focus on the bridges.

    Table of CEO High-level Perspective

    Focus more on unifying the view of technology spend than on the numbers

    When talking to the CEO, seek to build mutual understanding and encourage a holistic approach to the organization's technology spend.

    Use the numbers to get to the real issues.

    • Clarify with the CEO what business innovation, business growth, and KTLO means to them and the role each plays in the organization's strategic and operational plans.
    • Find out the role they think IT, and technology as a whole, has in realizing business plans. Only then can you look at the relative allocation of IT spend with them to see if the aspiration aligns with reality.
    • Eventually, you'll need to discuss expectations around who pays the bills for operationally supporting capital technology investments over the long-term (i.e. IT or the business units that actually want and use it). You'll have concrete examples of business projects that consumed IT operations resources without a corresponding increase in IT's OpEx budget.

    Focus your KTLO spend conversation on risk and trade-off.

    • Every strategic conversation needs to look at the impact on ongoing operations. Every discussion about CapEx needs to investigate the long-term repercussions for OpEx. Look at the whole tech spend picture.
    • Use risk to get KTLO/OpEx into the conversation. Be straightforward (i.e. "If we do/don't do this, then we can/can't do that"). Simply put, mitigating the risks that get in the way of having it all usually requires spending.

    CEO Innovation View: Learn what's really expected of IT

    Now that you've mapped your IT spend data to the CEO Innovation View, there are some questions you're better equipped to answer, namely:

    • Why is KTLO spend so high?
    • What should our operational spend priorities be?
    • Which projects and investments should we prioritize?
    • Are we spending enough on innovative initiatives?

    You now have:

    • A holistic, organization-wide view of total technology spend in support of different investment types, namely business innovation, business growth, and keeping things up and running.
    • Data-driven examples that prove the impact of near-term capital spend on long-term operational expenses and the intimate relationship between the two types of spend.
    • A way to measure the degree of alignment between the innovation and growth goals the organization has and how money is actually being spent to realize those goals.
    • A platform to discuss how technology investment decision-making and governance can work better to realize organizational mandates and goals.

    I know what IT costs us, but what is it really worth?

    Here's how tech spend directly supports business objectives ...

    Chart of CEO Innovation View

    Revisit your IT spend transparency objectives before crafting your executive presentation

    Go back to exercise 1.1 to remind yourself why you undertook this effort in the first place, clear your head of all that data, and refocus on the big picture.

    Review the real problems and issues you need to address and the key stakeholders.
    This will guide what data you focus on or showcase with other business leaders. For example, if IT OpEx is perceived as high, be prepared to examine the CapEx/OpEx ratio as well as cloud-related spend's impact on OpEx.

    Flag ITFM processes you'll develop as part of your ITFM maturity improvement plan.
    You won't become a TCO math expert overnight, but being able to communicate your awareness of and commitment to developing and applying ITFM capabilities helps build confidence in you and the information you're presenting.

    Use your first big presentation to debut ITFM.
    ITFM as a formal practice and the changes you hope to make may be a novel concept for your business peers. Use your newfound IT spend and staffing transparency to gently wade into the topic instead of going for the deep dive.

    Now it's time to present your transparent IT spend and staffing data to your executive

    Pull out of analysis mode. You're starting to tell the IT spend story, and this is just the first chapter. Introduce your cast of characters and pique your audience's interest.

    The goal of this first presentation is to showcase IT spend in general and make sure that everyone's getting the same information as everyone else.

    Go broad, not deep
    Defer any in-depth examinations until after you're sure you have everyone's attention. Only dive deep when you're ready to talk about specific plans via follow-up sessions.

    Focus on the CXO
    Given your audience, the CXO Business View may be the most interesting for them and will trigger the most questions and discussion. Plan to spend the largest chunk of your time here.

    Avoid judgment
    Let the numbers speak for themselves. Do point out what's high and what's low, but don't offer your opinion about whether it's good or bad. Let your audience draw their own conclusions.

    Ask for impressions
    Education and awareness are primary objectives. What comes up will give a good indication of what's known, what's news, who's interested, and where there's work to do.

    Pick a starting point
    Ask what they see as high-priority areas for both optimizing IT costs as well as improving the organization's approach to making IT spend decisions in general.

    What to include in your presentation ...

    • Purpose: Why you did the IT spend and staffing transparency exercise.
    • Method: The models and processes you used to map the data.
    • Data: Charts from the IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook.
    • Feedback: Space for your audience to voice their thoughts.
    • Next steps: Discussion and summary of actions to come.

    5.2 Develop an executive presentation

    Duration: Two hours

    1. Download the IT Staff & Spend Executive Presentation Template.
    2. Copy and paste the IT spend output tables and graphs into the template. (Note: Pasting as an image will preserve formatting.)
    3. Incorporate observations and insights about your analysis of your IT spend metrics.
    4. Conduct an internal review of the final presentation to ensure it includes all the elements you need and is error free.
    5. Book time to make your presentation to the executive team. Plan time after the presentation to field questions, engage in follow-up information sessions, and act on feedback.

    Note: Refer to your organization's standards and norms for executive-level presentations and either adapt the Info-Tech template accordingly or use your own.

    Input Output
    • Tabular and graphical data outputs in the IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook
    • Executive presentation summarizing your organization's actual IT spend
    Materials Participants
    • IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Workbook
    • IT Staff & Spend Executive Presentation Template
    • CIO/IT directors
    • IT financial lead
    • Other IT management

    Download the IT Spend & Staffing Transparency Executive Presentation TemplateTemplate

    Phase 5: Identify implications for IT

    Achievement summary

    You've done the hard part in starting your IT spend transparency journey. You have:

    • Analyzed the results of your IT spend mapping process.
    • Revisited your transparency objectives.
    • Prepared an executive presentation so you can share findings with other leaders in your organization.

    "Having internal conversations, especially if there is doubt, allows for accuracy and confidence in your model. I was showing someone the cost of a service he managed. He didn't believe the service was so expensive. We went through it: here are the people we allocated, the assets we allocated, and the software we allocated. It was right - that was the total cost. He was like, 'No way. Wow.' The costs were high, and the transparency is what allowed for a conversation on cost optimization."
    - Monica Braun, Research Director, ITFM Practice, Info-Tech Research Group

    Next Steps

    Achieve IT Spend & Staffing Transparency

    This final section will provide you with:

    • An overall summary of accomplishment
    • Recommended next steps
    • A list of contributors to this research
    • Some related Info-Tech resources to help you grow your ITFM practice

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Congratulations! You now have a fully transparent view of your IT spend.

    You've now mapped the entirety of technology spend in your organization. You've:

    1. Learned the key sources of spend data and information in your organization.
    2. Set some standards for data organization and labeling.
    3. Have a methodology for continuing to track and document spend in a transparent way.
    4. Crafted an executive presentation that's a first step in having more meaningful and constructive conversations about IT spend with your key stakeholders.

    What's next?

    With a reliable baseline, you can look forward to more informed and defensible IT budgeting and cost optimization. Use your newly-transparent IT spend as a foundation for improving your financial data hygiene in the near term and evolving your overall ITFM governance maturity in the long-term.

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through an Info-Tech full-service engagement or Guided Implementation.

    Contact your account representative for more information.

    1-888-670-8889

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Monica Braun, Research Director, ITFM Practice

    Monica Braun
    Research Director, ITFM Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Dave Kish, Practice Lead, ITFM Practice

    Dave Kish
    Practice Lead, ITFM Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Kennedy Confurius, Research Analyst, ITFM Practice

    Kennedy Confurius
    Research Analyst, ITFM Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Aman Kumari, Research Specialist, ITFM Practice

    Aman Kumari
    Research Specialist, ITFM Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Rex Ding, Research Specialist, ITFM Practice

    Rex Ding
    Research Specialist, ITFM Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Angie Reynolds, Principal Research Director, ITFM Practice

    Angie Reynolds
    Principal Research Director, ITFM Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Build Your IT Cost Optimization Roadmap

    • Cost optimization often doesn't go beyond the cutting part, but cutting costs isn't strategic - it's reactive and can easily result in mistakes.
    • True cost optimization is much more than this. Re-focus your efforts on optimizing your cost-to-value ratio and implementing a sustainable cost-optimization practice.

    Build an IT Budget

    • Budgetary approval is difficult because finance executives have a limited understanding of IT and use a different vocabulary.
    • Detailed budgets must be constructed in a way that is transparent but at a level of appropriate detail in order to limit complexity and confusion.

    Manage an IT Budget

    • No one likes to be over budget, but being under budget isn't necessarily good either.
    • Implement a budget management process that documents your planned budget and actual expenditures, tracks variances, and responds to those variances to stay on track.
    • Control for under- or overspending using Info Tech's budget management tool and tactics.

    APPENDIX

    Sample shared business services

    Sample industry-specific business services

    Sample shared business functions

    Business function Definition
    Human Resources The management of the recruitment, training, development, appraisal, compensation/reward, retention, and departure of employees in an organization. Does not include management of subcontractor or outsourced relationships.
    Finance and Accounting The management and analysis of an organization's revenue, funds, spend, investments, financial transactions, accounts, and financial statements. Often includes enterprise asset management.
    Procurement and Supplier Management Acquiring materials, goods, and services from an external party, including identifying potential suppliers/providers, managing tendering or bidding processes, negotiating terms and agreements, and managing the relationship with the vendor/provider.
    Information Technology The development, management, and optimization of information technology resources and systems over their lifecycle in support of an organization's work priorities and goals. Includes computer-based information and communication systems, but typically excludes industrial operational technologies.
    Legal Expertise in interpretation, implication, and application of legislation and regulation that affects the enterprise, including guidance and support in the areas of risk, contracting, compliance, ownership, and litigation.
    Regulatory Affairs and Compliance Management Identification, operationalization, monitoring, reporting, and enforcement of the standards, rules, codes, and laws that apply to an organization's operating environment and the products and services it offers.
    Sales Transactional provision of a product or service to a buyer at an agreed-upon price. Includes identifying and developing prospective buyers, presenting and explaining the product/service, overcoming prospect objections and concerns to purchase, negotiating terms, developing contracts, and billing or invoicing.
    Customer Service and Support A range of activities designed to optimize the customer experience with an organization and its products and services throughout the customer lifecycle with the goals of retaining the customer; encouraging additional spend or consumption; the customer positively influencing other potential customers; and minimizing financial and reputational business risks.
    Marketing and Advertising Understanding customer/prospect needs, developing strategies to meet those needs, and promotion of the organization's products/services to a target market via a range of channels to maximize revenue, membership, donations, and/or develop the organization's brand or reputation. Includes market research and analysis and promotion, campaign, and brand management.

    Sample industry-specific functions

    Supply chain and capital-intensive industries.

    Industry function Definition
    Product Innovation Research, design, development, and launch of new products, including the engineering of their underlying production processes.
    Product and Service Portfolio Management The management of an organization's collection of products and services, including management of the product/service roadmap; product/service portfolio and catalog; product/service quality and performance; and product/service pricing, bundling and markdown.
    Logistics and Supply Chain Management Sourcing raw materials or component parts needed and shipping of a finished product. Includes demand planning; procurement/supplier management; inventory management; yard management; allocation management; fulfillment and replenishment; and product distribution and delivery.
    Production Operations Manufacture, storage, and tracking of a product and ensuring product and production process quality. Includes operations management, materials management, quality/safety control, packaging management, and management of the tools, equipment, and technologies that support it.
    Architecture & Engineering The design and planning of structures or critical infrastructure systems according to scientific, functional, and aesthetic principles.
    Construction New construction, assembly, or alteration of buildings and critical infrastructure (e.g. transportation systems; telecommunications systems; utilities generation/transmission/distribution facilities and systems). Includes management of all construction project plans and the people, materials, and equipment required to execute.
    Real Estate Management Management of any residential, commercial, or industrial real estate holdings (land and buildings), including any financial dealings such as its purchase, sale, transfer, and rental as well as ongoing maintenance and repair of associated infrastructure and capital assets.

    Sample industry-specific functions

    Financial services and insurance industries.

    Industry function Definition
    Core Banking Services Includes ATM management; account management (opening, deposit/withdrawal, interest calculation, overdraft management, closing); payments processing; funds transfers; foreign currency exchange; cash management.
    Loan, Mortgage, and Credit Services Includes application, adjudication, and approval; facility; disbursement/card issuance; authorization management; merchant services; interest calculation; billing/payment; debt/collections management.
    Investment and Wealth Management Processes for the investment of premiums/monies received from policy holders/customers to generate wealth. Often two-pronged: internal investment to fund claim payout in the case of insurance, and customer-facing investment as a financial service (e.g. retirement planning/annuities). Includes product development and management, investment management, safety deposit box services, trust management services.
    Actuarial Analysis & Policy Creation Development of new policy products based on analysis of past losses and patterns, forecasts of financial risks, and assessment of potential profitability (i.e. actuarial science). These processes also include development of rate schedules (pricing) and the reserves that the insurer needs to have available for potential claim payouts.
    Underwriting & Policy Administration Processes for assessing risk of a potential policy holder; determining whether to insure them or not; setting the premiums the policy holder must pay; and administering the policy over the course of its lifecycle (including updates and billing).
    Claims Processing & Claims Management Processes for receiving, investigating, evaluating, approving/denying, and disbursing a claim payout. This process is unique to the insurance industry. In health insurance, ongoing case management processes need to be considered here whereby the insurer monitors and approves patient treatments over a long-term basis to ensure that the treatments are both necessary and beneficial.

    Sample industry-specific functions

    Healthcare industry

    Industry function Definition
    Patient Intake & Admissions Processes whereby key pieces of information about a patient are registered, updated, or confirmed with the healthcare provider in order to access healthcare services. Includes patient triage, intake management, and admissions management. These processes are generally administrative in nature.
    Patient Diagnosis A range of methods for determining the medical condition a patient has in order to provide appropriate care or treatment. Includes examination, consultation, testing, and diagnostic imaging.
    Patient Treatment The range of medical procedures, methods, and interventions to mitigate, relieve, or cure a patient's symptom, injury, disease, or other medical condition. Includes consultation and referral; treatment and care planning; medical procedure management; nursing and personal support; medicine management; trauma management; diet and nutrition management; and patient transportation.
    Patient Recovery & Ongoing Care Processes and methods for tracking the progress of a patient post-treatment; improving their health outcomes; restoring, maintaining, or improving their quality of life; and discharging or transferring them to other providers. Includes remote monitoring of vital parameters, physical therapy, post-trauma care, and a range of restorative and lifestyle modification programs.

    Sample industry-specific functions

    Gaming and hospitality industries

    Industry function Definition
    Accommodation Short-term lodging in hotel facilities. Includes management and maintenance of guest rooms and common spaces, amenities (e.g. swimming pool), and other related services (e.g. valet parking).
    Gaming Includes table wagering games and gambling activities such as slot machines or any other activity that includes on premises mobile casino gaming.
    Food & Beverage Services Food and beverages prepared, served, or available for sale by the hotel on the hotel premises via restaurants and bars and room service. Excludes catering (see Events Management) and management or operation of independent leased food and beverage establishments located on the hotel premises.
    Entertainment & Events Planning, coordination, and on-premises hosting of events including conferences, conventions, trade shows, parties, ceremonies and live entertainment, and other forms of recreation on the hotel premises. Includes all aspects of entertainment operations, facility management and catering for the event.

    Document and Maintain Your Disaster Recovery Plan

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}417|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.3/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $52,224 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 38 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: DR and Business Continuity
    • Parent Category Link: /business-continuity
    • Disaster recovery plan (DRP) documentation is often driven by audit or compliance requirements rather than aimed at the team that would need to execute recovery.
    • Between day-to-day IT projects and the difficulty of maintaining 300+ page manuals, DRP documentation is not updated and quickly becomes unreliable.
    • Inefficient publishing strategies result in your DRP not being accessible during disaster or key staff not knowing where to find the latest version.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • DR documentation fails when organizations try to boil the ocean with an all-in-one plan aimed at auditors, business leaders, and IT. It’s too long, too hard to maintain, and ends up being little more than shelf-ware.
    • Using flowcharts, checklists, and diagrams aimed at an IT audience is more concise and effective in a disaster, quicker to create, and easier to maintain.
    • Create your DRP in layers to keep the work manageable. Start with a recovery workflow to ensure a coordinated response, and build out supporting documentation over time.

    Impact and Result

    • Create visual and concise DR documentation that strips out unnecessary content and is written for an IT audience – the team that would actually be executing the recovery. Your business leaders can take the same approach to create separate business response plans. Don’t mix the two in an all-in-one plan that is not effective for either audience.
    • Determine a documentation distribution strategy that supports ease of maintenance and accessibility during a disaster.
    • Incorporate DRP maintenance into change management procedures to systematically update and refine the DR documentation. Don’t save up changes for a year-end blitz, which turns document maintenance into an onerous project.

    Document and Maintain Your Disaster Recovery Plan Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should adopt a visual-based DRP, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Streamline DRP documentation

    Start by documenting your recovery workflow. Create supporting documentation in the form of checklists, flowcharts, topology diagrams, and contact lists. Finally, summarize your DR capabilities in a DRP Summary Document for stakeholders and auditors.

    • Document and Maintain Your Disaster Recovery Plan – Phase 1: Streamline DRP Documentation

    2. Select the optimal DRP publishing strategy

    Select criteria for assessing DRP tools, and evaluate whether a business continuity management tool, document management solution, wiki site, or manually distributing documentation is best for your DR team.

    • Document and Maintain Your Disaster Recovery Plan – Phase 2: Select the Optimal DRP Publishing Strategy
    • DRP Publishing and Document Management Solution Evaluation Tool
    • BCM Tool – RFP Selection Criteria

    3. Keep your DRP relevant through maintenance best practices

    Learn how to integrate DRP maintenance into core IT processes, and learn what to look for during testing and during annual reviews of your DRP.

    • Document and Maintain Your Disaster Recovery Plan – Phase 3: Keep Your DRP Relevant Through Maintenance Best Practices
    • Sample Project Intake Form Addendum for Disaster Recovery
    • Sample Change Management Checklist for Disaster Recovery
    • DRP Review Checklist
    • DRP-BCP Review Workflow (Visio)
    • DRP-BCP Review Workflow (PDF)

    4. Appendix: XMPL Case Study

    Model your DRP after the XMPL case study disaster recovery plan documentation.

    • Document and Maintain Your Disaster Recovery Plan – Appendix: XMPL Case Study
    • XMPL DRP Summary Document
    • XMPL Notification, Assessment, and Declaration Plan
    • XMPL Systems Recovery Playbook
    • XMPL Recovery Workflows (Visio)
    • XMPL Recovery Workflows (PDF)
    • XMPL Data Center and Network Diagrams (Visio)
    • XMPL Data Center and Network Diagrams (PDF)
    • XMPL DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool
    • XMPL DRP Workbook
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Document and Maintain Your Disaster Recovery Plan

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Streamline DRP Documentation

    The Purpose

    Teach your team how to create visual-based documentation.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Learn how to create visual-based DR documentation.

    Activities

    1.1 Conduct a table-top planning exercise.

    1.2 Document your high-level incident response plan.

    1.3 Identify documentation to include in your playbook.

    1.4 Create an initial collection of supplementary documentation.

    1.5 Discuss what further documentation is necessary for recovering from a disaster.

    1.6 Summarize your DR capabilities for stakeholders.

    Outputs

    Documented high-level incident response plan

    List of documentation action items

    Collection of 1-3 draft checklists, flowcharts, topology diagrams, and contact lists

    Action items for ensuring that the DRP is executable for both primary and backup DR personnel

    DRP Summary Document

    2 Select the Optimal DRP Publishing Strategy

    The Purpose

    Learn the considerations for publishing your DRP.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Identify the best strategy for publishing your DRP.

    Activities

    2.1 Select criteria for assessing DRP tools.

    2.2 Evaluate categories for DRP tools.

    Outputs

    Strategy for publishing DRP

    3 Learn How to Keep Your DRP Relevant Through Maintenance Best Practices

    The Purpose

    Address the common pain point of unmaintained DRPs.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Create an approach for maintaining your DRP.

    Activities

    3.1 Alter your project intake considerations.

    3.2 Integrate DR considerations into change management.

    3.3 Integrate documentation into performance measurement and performance management.

    3.4 Learn best practices for maintaining your DRP.

    Outputs

    Project Intake Form Addendum Template

    Change Management DRP Checklist Template

    Further reading

    Document and Maintain Your Disaster Recovery Plan

    Put your DRP on a diet – keep it fit, trim, and ready for action.

    ANALYST PERSPECTIVE

    The traditional disaster recovery plan (DRP) “red binder” is dead. It takes too long to create, it’s too hard to maintain, and it’s not usable in a crisis.

    “This blueprint outlines the following key tactics to streamline your documentation effort and produce a better result:

    • Write for an IT audience and focus on how to recover. You don’t need 30 pages of fluff describing the purpose of the document.
    • Use flowcharts, checklists, and diagrams over traditional manuals. This drives documentation that is more concise, easier to maintain, and effective in a crisis.
    • Create your DRP in layers to get tangible results faster, starting with a recovery workflow that outlines your DR strategy, and then build out the specific documentation needed to support recovery.”
    (Frank Trovato, Research Director, Infrastructure, Info-Tech Research Group)

    This project is about DRP documentation after you have clarified your DR strategy; create these necessary inputs first

    These artifacts are the cornerstone for any disaster recovery plan.

    • Business Impact Analysis
    • DR Roles and Responsibilities
    • Recovery Workflow

    Missing a component? Start here. ➔ Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan

    This blueprint walks you through building these inputs.
    Our approach saves clients on average US$16,825.22. (Clients self-reported an average saving of US$16,869.21 while completing the Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan blueprint through advisory calls, guided implementations, or workshops (Info-Tech Research Group, 2017, N=129).)

    How this blueprint will help you document your DRP

    This Research is Designed For:

    • IT managers in charge of disaster recovery planning (DRP) and execution.
    • Organizations seeking to optimize their DRP using best-practice methodology.
    • Business continuity professionals that are involved with disaster recovery.

    This Research Will Help You:

    • Divide the process of creating DR documentation into manageable chunks, providing a defined scope for you to work in.
    • Identify an appropriate DRP document management and distribution strategy.
    • Ensure that DR documentation is up to date and accessible.

    This Research Will Also Assist:

    • IT managers preparing for a DR audit.
    • IT managers looking to incorporate components of DR into an IT operations document.

    This Research Will Help Them:

    • Follow a structured approach in building DR documentation using best practices.
    • Integrate DR into day-to-day IT operations.

    Executive summary

    Situation

    • DR documentation is often driven by audit or compliance requirements, rather than aimed at the team that would need to execute recovery.
    • Traditional DRPs are text-heavy, 300+ page manuals that are simply not usable in a crisis.
    • Compounding the problem, DR documentation is rarely updated, so it’s just shelf-ware.

    Complication

    • DRP is often given lower priority as day-to-day IT projects displace DR documentation efforts.
    • Inefficient publishing strategies result in your DRP not being accessible during disasters or key staff not knowing where to find the latest version.
    • Organizations that create traditional DRPs end up with massive manuals that are difficult to maintain, so they quickly become unreliable.

    Resolution

    • Create visual and concise DR documentation that strips out unnecessary content and is written for an IT audience – the team that would actually be executing the recovery. Your business leaders can take the same approach to create separate business response plans – don’t mix the two into an all-in-one plan that is not effective for either audience.
    • Determine a documentation distribution strategy that supports ease of maintenance and accessibility during a disaster.
    • Incorporate DRP maintenance into change management and project intake procedures to systematically update and refine the DR documentation. Don’t save up changes for a year-end blitz, which turns document maintenance into an onerous project.

    Info-Tech Insight

    1. DR documentation fails when organizations try to boil the ocean with an all-in-one plan aimed at auditors, business leaders, and IT. It’s too long, too hard to maintain, and ends up being little more than shelf-ware.
    2. Using flowcharts, checklists, and diagrams aimed at an IT audience is more concise and effective in a disaster, quicker to create, and easier to maintain.
    3. Create your DRP in layers to keep the work manageable. Start with a recovery workflow to ensure a coordinated response, and build out supporting documentation over time.

    An effective DRP that mitigates a wide range of potential outages is critical to minimizing the impact of downtime

    The criticality of having an effective DRP is underestimated.

    Cost of Downtime for the Fortune 1000
    • Cost of unplanned apps downtime per year: $1.25B to $2.5B
    • Cost of critical apps failure per hour: $500,000 to $1M
    • Cost of infrastructure failure per hour: $100,000
    • 35% reported to have recovered within 12 hours.
    • 17% of infrastructure failures took more than 24 hours to recover.
    • 13% of application failures took more than 24 hours to recover.
    Size of Impact Increasing Across Industries
    • The cost of downtime is rising across the board and not just for organizations that traditionally depend on IT (e.g. e-commerce).
    • Downtime cost increase since 2010:
      • Hospitality: 129% increase
      • Transportation: 108% increase
      • Media organizations: 104% increase
    Potential Lost Revenue
    A line graph of Potential Lost Revenue with vertical axis 'LOSS ($)' and horizontal axis 'TIME'. The line starts with low losses near the origin where 'Incident Occurs', gradually accelerates to higher losses as time passes, then decelerates before 'All Revenue Lost'. Note: 'Delay in recovery causes exponential revenue loss'.
    (Adapted from: Rothstein, Philip Jan. Disaster Recovery Testing: Exercising Your Contingency Plan (2007 Edition).)

    The impact of downtime increases significantly over time, not just in terms of lost revenue (as illustrated here) but also goodwill/reputation and health/safety. An effective DR solution and overall resiliency that mitigate a wide range of potential outages are critical to minimizing the impact of downtime.

    Without an effective DRP, your organization is gambling on being able to define and implement a recovery strategy during a time of crisis. At the very least, this means extended downtime – potentially weeks – and substantial impact.

    Only 38% of those with a full or mostly complete DRP believe their DRPs would be effective in a real crisis

    Organizations continue to struggle with creating DRPs, let alone making them actionable.

    Why are so many living with either an incomplete or ineffective DRP? For the same reasons that IT documentation in general continues to be a pain point:

    • It is an outdated model of what documentation should be – the traditional manual with detailed (lengthy) descriptions and procedures.
    • Despite the importance of DR, low priority is placed on creating a DRP and the day-to-day SOPs required to support a recovery.
    • There is a lack of effective processes for ensuring documentation stays up to date.
    A bar graph documenting percentages of survey responses about the completeness of their DRP. 'Only 20% of survey respondents indicated they have a complete DRP'. 13% said 'No DRP'. 33% said 'Partial DRP'. 34% said 'Mostly Completed'. 20% said 'Full DRP'.
    (Source: Info-Tech Research Group, N=165)
    A bar graph documenting percentages of survey responses about the level of confidence in their DRP. 'Only 38% of those who have a mostly completed or full DRP actually feel it would be effective in a crisis'. 4% said 'Low'. 58% said 'Unsure'. 38% said 'Confident'.
    (Source: Info-Tech Research Group, N=69 (includes only those who indicated DRP is mostly completed or completed))

    Improve usability and effectiveness with visual-based and more-concise documentation

    Choose flowcharts over process guides, checklists over lengthy procedures, and diagrams over descriptions.

    If you need a three-inch binder to hold your DRP, imagine having to flip through it to determine next steps during a crisis.

    DR documentation needs to be concise, scannable, and quickly understood to be effective. Visual-based documentation meets these requirements, so it’s no surprise that it also leads to higher DR success.

    DR success scores are based on:

    • Meeting recovery time objectives (RTOs).
    • Meeting recovery point objectives (RPOs).
    • IT staff’s confidence in their ability to meet RTOs/RPOs.
    A line graph of DR documentation types and their effectiveness. The vertical axis is 'DR Success', from Low to High. The horizontal axis is Documentation Type, from 'Traditional Manual' to 'Primarily flowcharts, checklists, and diagrams'. The line trends up to higher success with visual-based and more-concise documentation.(Source: Info-Tech Research Group, N=95)

    “Without question, 300-page DRPs are not effective. I mean, auditors love them because of the detail, but give me a 10-page DRP with contact lists, process flows, diagrams, and recovery checklists that are easy to follow.” (Bernard Jones, MBCI, CBCP, CORP, Manager Disaster Recovery/BCP, ActiveHealth Management)

    Maintainability is another argument for visual-based, concise documentation

    There are two end goals for your DR documentation: effectiveness and maintainability. Without either, you will not have success during a disaster.

    Organizations using a visual-based approach were 30% more likely to find that DR documentation is easy to maintain. “Easy to maintain” leads to a 46% higher rate of DR success.
    Two bar graphs documenting survey responses regarding maintenance ease of DR documentation types. The first graph compares Traditional Manual vs Visual-based. For 'Traditional Manual' 72% responded they were Difficult to maintain while 28% responded they were Easy to maintain; for 'Visual-based' 42% responded they were Difficult to maintain while 58% responded they were Easy to maintain. Visual-based DR documentation received 30% more votes for Easy to Maintain. The second graph compares success rates of 'Difficult to Maintain' vs 'Easy to Maintain' DR documentation with Difficult being 31% and Easy being 77%, a 46% difference. 'Source: Info-Tech Research Group, N=96'.

    Not only are visual-based disaster recovery plans more effective, but they are also easier to maintain.

    Overcome documentation inertia with a tiered model that allows you to eat the elephant one bite at a time

    Start with a recovery workflow to at least ensure a coordinated response. Then use that workflow to determine required supporting documentation.

    Recovery Workflow: Starting the project with overly detailed documentation can slow down the entire process. Overcome planning inertia by starting with high-level incident response plans in a flowchart format. For examples and additional information, see XMPL Medical’s Recovery Workflows.

    Recovery Procedures (Systems Recovery Playbook): For each step in the high-level flowchart, create recovery procedures where necessary using additional flowcharts, checklists, and diagrams as appropriate. Leverage Info-Tech’s Systems Recovery Playbook example as a starting point.

    Additional Reference Documentation: Reference existing IT documentation, such as network diagrams and configuration documents, as well as more detailed step-by-step procedures where necessary (e.g. vendor documentation), particularly where needed to support alternate recovery staff who may not be as well versed as the primary system owners.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Organizations that use flowcharts, checklist, and diagrams over traditional, dense DRP manuals are far more likely to meet their RTOs/RPOs because their documentation is more usable and easier to maintain.

    Use a DRP summary document to satisfy executives, auditors, and clients

    Stakeholders don’t have time to sift through a pile of paper. Summarize your overall continuity capabilities in one, easy-to-read place.

    DRP Summary Document

    • Summarize BIA results
    • Summarize DR strategy (including DR sites)
    • Summarize backup strategy
    • Summarize testing and maintenance plans

    Follow Info-Tech’s methodology to make DRP documentation efficient and effective

    Phases

    Phase 1: Streamline DRP documentation Phase 2: Select the optimal DRP publishing strategy Phase 3: Keep your DRP relevant through maintenance best practices

    Phases

    1.1

    Start with a recovery workflow

    2.1

    Decide on a publishing strategy

    3.1

    Incorporate DRP maintenance into core IT processes

    1.2

    Create supporting DRP documentation

    3.2

    Conduct an annual focused review

    1.3

    Write the DRP Summary

    Tools and Templates

    End-to-End Sample DRP DRP Publishing Evaluation Tool Project In-take/Request Form

    Change Management Checklist

    Follow XMPL Medical’s journey through DR documentation

    CASE STUDY

    Industry Healthcare
    Source Created by amalgamating data from Info-Tech’s client base

    Streamline your documentation and maintenance process by following the approach outlined in XMPL Medical’s journey to an end-to-end DRP.

    Outline of the Disaster Recovery Plan

    XMPL’s disaster recovery plan includes its business impact analysis and a subset of tier 1 and tier 2 patient care applications.

    Its DRP includes incident response flowcharts, system recovery checklists, and a communication plan. Its DRP also references IT operations documentation (e.g. asset management documents, system specs, and system configuration docs), but this material is not published with the example documentation.

    Resulting Disaster Recovery Plan

    XMPL’s DRP includes actionable documents in the form of high-level disaster response plan flowcharts and system recovery checklists. During an incident, the DR team is able to clearly see the items for which they are responsible.

    Disaster Recovery Plan
    • Recovery Workflow
    • Business Impact Analysis
    • DRP Summary
    • System Recovery Checklists
    • Communication, Assessment, and Disaster Declaration Plan

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    XMPL Medical’s disaster recovery plan illustrates an effective DRP. Model your end-to-end disaster recovery plan after XMPL’s completed templates. The specific data points will differ from organization to organization, but the structure of each document will be similar.

    Model your disaster recovery documentation off of our example

    CASE STUDY

    Industry Healthcare
    Source Created by amalgamating data from Info-Tech’s client base

    Recovery Workflow:

    • Recovery Workflows (PDF, VSDX)

    Recovery Procedures (Systems Recovery Playbook):

    • DR Notification, Assessment, and Disaster Declaration Plan
    • Systems Recovery Playbook
    • Network Topology Diagrams

    Additional Reference Documentation:

    • DRP Workbook
    • Business Impact Analysis
    • DRP Summary Document

    Use Info-Tech’s DRP Maturity Scorecard to evaluate your progress

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Document and Maintain Your Disaster Recovery Plan – Project Overview

    1. Streamline DRP Documentation 2. Select the Optimal DRP Publishing Strategy 3. Keep Your DRP Relevant
    Supporting Tool icon
    Best-Practice Toolkit

    1.1 Start with a recovery workflow

    1.2 Create supporting DRP documentation

    1.3 Write the DRP summary

    2.1 Create Committee Profiles

    3.1 Build Governance Structure Map

    3.2 Create Committee Profiles

    Guided Implementations
    • Review Info-Tech’s approach to DRP documentation.
    • Create a high-level recovery workflow.
    • Create supporting DRP documentation.
    • Write the DRP summary.
    • Identify criteria for selecting a DRP publishing strategy.
    • Select a DRP publishing strategy.
    • Optional: Select requirements for a BCM tool and issue an RFP.
    • Optional: Review responses to RFP.
    • Learn best practices for integrating DRP maintenance into day-to-day IT processes.
    • Learn best practices for DRP-focused reviews.
    Associated Activity icon
    Onsite Workshop
    Module 1:
    Streamline DRP documentation
    Module 2:
    Select the optimal DRP publishing strategy
    Module 3:
    Learn best practices for keeping your DRP relevant
    Phase 1 Outcome:
    • A complete end-to-end DRP
    Phase 2 Outcome:
    • Selection of a publishing and management tool for your DRP documentation
    Phase 3 Outcome:
    • Strategy for maintaining your DRP documentation

    Workshop Overview Associated Activity icon

    Contact your account representative or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Workshop Day 1 Workshop Day 2 Workshop Day 3 Workshop Day 4 Workshop Day 5
    Info-Tech Analysts Finalize Deliverables
    Activities
    Assess DRP Maturity and Review Current Capabilities

    0.1 Assess current DRP maturity through Info-Tech’s Maturity Scorecard.

    0.2 Identify the IT systems that support mission-critical business activities, and select 2 or 3 key applications to be the focus of the workshop.

    0.3 Identify current recovery strategies for selected applications.

    0.4 Identify current DR challenges for selected applications.

    Document Your Recovery Workflow

    1.1 Create a recovery workflow: review tabletop planning, walk through DR scenarios, identify DR gaps, and determine how to fill them.

    Create Supporting Documentation

    1.2 Create supporting DRP documentation.

    1.3 Write the DRP summary.

    Establish a DRP Publishing, Management, and Maintenance Strategy

    2.1 Decide on a publishing strategy.

    3.1 Incorporate DRP maintenance into core IT.

    3.2 Considerations for reviewing your DRP regularly.

    Deliverables
    1. Baseline DRP metric (based on DRP Maturity Scorecard)
    1. High-level DRP workflow
    2. DRP gaps and risks identified
    1. Recovery workflow and/or checklist for sample of IT systems
    2. Customized DRP Summary Template
    1. Strategy for selecting a DRP publishing tool
    2. DRP management and maintenance strategy
    3. Workshop summary presentation deck

    Workshop Goal: Learn how to document and maintain your DRP.

    Use these icons to help direct you as you navigate this research

    Use these icons to help guide you through each step of the blueprint and direct you to content related to the recommended activities.

    A small monochrome icon of a wrench and screwdriver creating an X.

    This icon denotes a slide where a supporting Info-Tech tool or template will help you perform the activity or step associated with the slide. Refer to the supporting tool or template to get the best results and proceed to the next step of the project.

    A small monochrome icon depicting a person in front of a blank slide.

    This icon denotes a slide with an associated activity. The activity can be performed either as part of your project or with the support of Info-Tech team members, who will come onsite to facilitate a workshop for your organization.


    Phase 1: Streamline DRP Documentation

    Step 1.1: Start with a recovery workflow

    PHASE 1
    PHASE 2
    PHASE 3
    1.1 1.2 1.3 2.1 3.1 3.2
    Start with a Recovery Workflow Create Supporting Documentation Write the DRP Summary Select DRP Publishing Strategy Integrate into Core IT Processes Conduct an Annual Focused Review

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Review a model DRP.
    • Review your recovery workflow.
    • Identify documentation required to support the recovery workflow.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • DRP Owner
    • System SMEs
    • Alternate DR Personnel

    Outcomes of this step

    • Understanding the visual-based, concise approach to DR documentation.
    • Creating a recovery workflow that provides a roadmap for coordinating incident response and identifying required supporting documentation.

    Info-Tech Insights

    A DRP is a collection of procedures and supporting documents that allow an organization to recover its IT services to minimize system downtime for the business.

    1.1 — Start with a recovery workflow to ensure a coordinated response and identify required supporting documentation

    The recovery workflow clarifies your DR strategy and ensures the DR team is on the same page.

    Recovery Workflow

    The recovery workflow maps out the incident response plan from event detection, assessment, and declaration to systems recovery and validation.

    This documentation includes:

    • Clarifying initial incident response steps.
    • Clarifying the order of systems recovery and which recovery actions can occur concurrently.
    • Estimating actual recovery timeline through each stage of recovery.
    Recovery Procedures (Playbook)
    Additional Reference Documentation

    “We use flowcharts for our declaration procedures. Flowcharts are more effective when you have to explain status and next steps to upper management.” (Assistant Director-IT Operations, Healthcare Industry)

    Review business impact analysis (BIA) results to plan your recovery workflow

    The BIA defines system criticality from the business’s perspective. Use it to guide system recovery order.

    Specifically, review the following from your BIA:

    • The list of tier 1, 2, and 3 applications. This will dictate the recovery order in your recovery workflow.
    • Application dependencies. This will outline what needs to be included as part of an application recovery workflow.
    • The recovery time objective (RTO) and recovery point objective (RPO) for each application. This will also guide the recovery, and enable you to identify gaps where the recovery workflow does not meet RTOs and RPOs.

    CASE STUDY: The XMPL DRP documentation is based on this Business Impact Analysis Tool.

    Haven’t conducted a BIA? Use Info-Tech’s streamlined approach.

    Info-Tech’s publication Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan takes a very practical approach to BIA work. Our process gives IT leaders a mechanism to quickly get agreement on system recovery order and DR investment priorities.

    Conduct a tabletop planning exercise to determine your recovery workflow

    Associated Activity icon 1.1.1 Tabletop Planning Exercise

    1. Define a scenario to drive the tabletop planning exercise:
      • Use a scenario that forces a full failover to your DR environment, so you can capture an end-to-end recovery workflow.
      • Avoid scenarios that impact health and safety such as tornados or a fire. You want to focus on IT recovery.
      • Example scenarios: Burst water pipe that causes data-center-wide damage or a gas leak that forces evacuation and power to be shut down for at least two days.

    Note: You may have already completed this exercise as part of Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Use scenarios to provide context for DR planning, and to test your plans, but don’t create a separate plan for every possibility.

    The high-level recovery plan will be the same whether the incident is a fire, flood, or tornado. While there might be some variances and outliers, these scenarios can be addressed by adding decision points and/or separate, supplementary instructions.

    Walk through the scenario and capture the recovery workflow

    Associated Activity icon 1.1.2 Tabletop Planning Exercise
    1. Capture the following information for tier 1, tier 2, and tier 3 systems:
      1. On white cue cards, record the steps and track start and end times for each step (where 00:00 is when the incident occurred).
      2. On yellow cue cards, document gaps in people, process, and technology requirements to complete the step.
      3. On red cue cards, indicate risks (e.g. no backup person for a key staff member).

    Note:

    • Ensure the language is sufficiently genericized (e.g. refer to events, not specifically a burst water pipe).
    • Review isolated failures (e.g. hardware, software). Typically, the recovery procedure documented for individual systems covers the essence of the recovery workflow whether it’s just the one system that failed or it’s part of a site-wide recovery.

    Note: You may have already completed this exercise as part of Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan.

    Document your current-state recovery workflow based on the results of the tabletop planning

    Supporting Tool icon 1.1.2 Incident Response Plan Flowcharts, Tabs 2 and 3

    After you finish the tabletop planning exercise, the steps on the set of cue cards define your recovery workflow. Capture this in a flowchart format.

    Use the sample DRP to guide your own flowchart. Some notes on the example are:

    • XMPL’s Incident Management to DR flowchart shows the connection between its standard Service Desk processes and DR processes.
    • XMPL’s high-level workflows outline its recovery of tier 1, 2, and 3 systems.
    • Where more detail is required, include links to supporting documentation. In this example, XMPL Medical includes links to its Systems Recovery Playbook.
    Preview of an Info-Tech Template depicting a sample flowchart.

    This sample flowchart is included in XMPL Recovery Workflows.

    Step 1.2: Create Supporting DRP Documentation

    PHASE 1
    PHASE 2
    PHASE 3
    1.11.21.32.13.13.2
    Start with a Recovery WorkflowCreate Supporting DocumentationWrite the DRP SummarySelect DRP Publishing StrategyIntegrate into Core IT ProcessesConduct an Annual Focused Review

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Create checklists for your playbook.
    • Document more complex procedures with flowcharts.
    • Gather and/or write network topology diagrams.
    • Compile a contact list.
    • Ensure there is enough material for backup personnel.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • DRP Owner
    • System SMEs
    • Backup DR Personnel

    Outcomes of this step

    • Actionable supporting documentation for your disaster recovery plan.
    • Contact list for IT personnel, business personnel, and vendor support.

    1.2 — Create supporting documentation for your disaster recovery plan

    Now that you have a high-level incident response plan, collect the information you need for executing that plan.

    Recovery Workflow

    Write your recovery procedures playbook to be effective and usable. Your playbook documentation should include:

    • Supplementary flowcharts
    • Checklists
    • Topology diagrams
    • Contact lists
    • DRP summary

    Reference vendors’ technical information in your flowcharts and checklists where appropriate.

    Recovery Procedures (Playbook)

    Additional Reference Documentation

    Info-Tech Insight

    Write for your audience. The playbook is for IT; include only the information they need to execute the plan. DRP summaries are for executives and auditors; do not include information intended for IT. Similarly, your disaster recovery plan is not for business units; keep BCP content out of your DRP.

    Use checklists to streamline step-by-step procedures

    Supporting Tool icon 1.2.1 XMPL Medical’s System Recovery Checklists

    Checklists are ideal when staff just need a reminder of what to do, not how to do it.

    XMPL Medical used its high-level flowcharts as a roadmap for creating its Systems Recovery Playbook.

    • Since its Playbook is intended for experienced IT staff, the writing style in the checklists is concise. XMPL includes links to reference material to support recovery, especially for alternate staff who might need additional instruction.
    • XMPL includes key parameters (e.g. IP addresses) rather than assume those details would be memorized, especially in a stressful DR scenario.
    • Similarly, include links to other useful resources such as VM templates.
    Preview of the Info-Tech Template 'Systems Recovery Playbook'.

    Included in the XMPL Systems Recovery Playbook are checklists for recovering XMPL’s virtual desktop infrastructure, mission-critical applications, and core infrastructure components.

    Use flowcharts to document processes with concurrent tasks not easily captured in a checklist

    Supporting Tool icon 1.2.2 XMPL Medical’s Phone Services Recovery Flowchart

    Recovery procedures can consist of flowcharts, checklists, or both, as well as diagrams. The main goal is to be clear and concise.

    • XMPL Medical created a flowchart to capture its phone services recovery procedure to capture concurrent tasks.
    • Additional instructions, where required, could still be captured in a Playbook checklist or other supporting documentation.
    • The flowchart could have also included key settings or other details as appropriate, particularly if the DR team chose to maintain this recovery procedure just in a flowchart format.
    Preview of the Info-Tech Template 'Recovery Workflows'.

    Included in the XMPL DR documentation is an example flowchart for recovering phone systems. This flowchart is in Recovery Workflows.

    Reference this blueprint for more SOP flowchart examples: Create Visual SOP Documents that Drive Process Optimization, Not Just Peace of Mind

    Use topology diagrams to capture network layout, integrations, and system information

    Supporting Tool icon 1.2.4 XMPL Medical’s Data Center and Network Diagrams

    Topology diagrams, key checklists, and configuration settings are often enough for experienced networking staff to carry out their DR tasks.

    • XMPL Medical includes these diagrams with its DRP. Instead of recreating these diagrams, the XMPL Medical DR Manager asked their network team for these diagrams:
      • Primary data center diagram
      • DR site diagram
      • High-level network diagrams
    • Often, organizations already have network topology diagrams for reference purposes.

    “Our network engineers came to me and said our standard SOP template didn't work for them. They're now using a lot of diagrams and flowcharts, and that has worked out better for them.” (Assistant Director-IT Operations, Healthcare Industry)

    Preview of the Info-Tech Template 'Systems Recovery Playbook'.

    You can download a PDF and a VSD version of these Data Center and Network Diagrams from Info-Tech’s website.

    Create a list of organizational, IT, and vendor contacts that may be required to assist with recovery

    If there is something strange happening to your IT infrastructure, who you gonna call?

    Many DR managers have their team on speed dial. However, having the contact info of alternate staff, BCP leads, and vendors can be very helpful during a disaster. XMPL Medical lists the following information in its DRP Workbook:

    • The DR Teams, SMEs critical to disaster recovery, their backups, and key contacts (e.g. BC Management team leads, vendor contacts) that would be involved in:
      • Declaring a disaster.
      • Coordinating a response at an organizational level.
      • Executing recovery.
    • The people that have authority to declare a disaster.
    • Each person’s spending authority.
    • The rules for delegating authority.
    • Primary and alternate staff for each role.
    Example list of alternate staff, BCP leads, and vendors.

    Confirm with your DR team that you have all of the documentation that you need to recover during a disaster

    Associated Activity icon 1.2.7 Group Discussion

    DISCUSS: Is there enough information in your DRP for both primary and backup DR personnel?

    • Is it clear who is responsible for each DR task, including notification steps?
    • Have alternate staff for each role been identified?
    • Does the recovery workflow capture all of the high-level steps?
    • Is there enough documentation for alternate staff (e.g. network specs)?

    Step 1.3: Write the DRP Summary

    PHASE 1
    PHASE 2
    PHASE 3
    1.11.21.32.13.13.2
    Start with a Recovery WorkflowCreate Supporting DocumentationWrite the DRP SummarySelect DRP Publishing StrategyIntegrate into Core IT ProcessesConduct an Annual Focused Review

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Write a DRP summary document.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • DRP Owner

    Outcomes of this step

    • High-level outline of your DRP capabilities for stakeholders such as executives, auditors, and clients.

    Summarize your DR capabilities using a DRP summary document

    Supporting Tool icon 1.3.1 DRP Summary Document

    The sample included on Info-Tech’s website is customized for the XMPL Medical Case Study – use the download as a starting point for your own summary document.

    DRP Summary Document

    XMPL’s DRP Summary is organized into the following categories:

    • DR requirements: This includes a summary of scope, business impact analysis (BIA), risk assessment, and high-level RTOs and achievable RTOs.
    • DR strategy: This includes a summary of XMPL’s recovery procedures, DR site, and backup strategy.
    • Testing and maintenance: This includes a summary of XMPL’s DRP testing and maintenance strategy.

    Be transparent about existing business risks in your DRP summary

    The DRP summary document is business facing. Include information of which business leaders (and other stakeholders) need to be aware.

    • Discrepancies between desired and achievable RTOs? Organizational leadership needs to know this information. Only then can they assign the resources and budget that IT needs to achieve the desired DR capabilities.
    • What is the DRP’s scope? XMPL Medical lists the IT components that will be recovered during a disaster, and components which will not. For instance, XMPL’s DRP does not recover medical equipment, and XMPL has separate plans for business continuity and emergency response coordination.
    Application tier Desired RTO (hh:mm) Desired RPO (hh:mm) Achievable RTO (hh:mm) Achievable RPO (hh:mm)
    Tier 1 4:00 1:00 *90:00 1:00
    Tier 2 8:00 1:00 *40:00 1:00
    Tier 3 48:00 24:00 *96:00 24:00

    The above table to is a snippet from the XMPL DR Summary Document (section 2.1.3.2).

    In the example, the DR team is unable to recover tier 1, 2, and 3 systems within the desired RTO. As such, they clearly communicate this information in the DRP summary, and include action items to address these gaps.

    Phase 2: Select the Optimal DRP Publishing Strategy

    Step 2.1: Select a DRP Publishing Strategy

    PHASE 1
    PHASE 2
    PHASE 3
    1.11.21.32.13.13.2
    Start with a Recovery WorkflowCreate Supporting DocumentationWrite the DRP SummarySelect DRP Publishing StrategyIntegrate into Core IT ProcessesConduct an Annual Focused Review

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Select criteria for assessing DRP tools.
    • Evaluate categories for DRP tools.
    • Optional: Write an RFP for a BCM tool.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • DRP Owner

    Outcomes of this step

    • Identified strategies for publishing your DRP (i.e. making it available to your DR team).

    Info-Tech Insights

    Diversify your publishing strategy to ensure you can access your DRP in a disaster. For example, if you are using a BCM tool or SharePoint Online as your primary documentation repository, also push the DRP to your DR team’s smartphones as a backup in case the disaster affects internet access.

    2.1 — Select a DR publishing and document management strategy that fits your organization

    Publishing and document management considerations:

    Portability/External Access: Assume your primary site is down and inaccessible. Can you still access your documentation? As shown in this chart, traditional strategies of either keeping a copy at another location (e.g. at the failover site) or with staff (e.g. on a USB drive) still dominate, but these aren’t necessarily the best options.
    A bar chart titled 'Portability Strategy Popularity'. 'External Website (wiki site, cloud-based DRP tool, etc.)' scored 16%. 'Failover Site (network drive or redundant SharePoint, etc.)' scored 53%. 'Distribute to Staff (use USB drive, personal email, etc.)' scored 50%. 'Not Accessible Offsite' scored 7%.
    Note: Percentages total more than 100% due to respondents using more than one portability strategy.
    (Source: Info-Tech Research Group, N=118)
    Maintainability/Usability: How easy is it to create, update, and use the documentation? Is it easy to link to other documents as shown in the flowchart and checklist examples? Is there version control? Lack of version control can create a maintenance nightmare as well as issues in a crisis if staff are questioning whether they have the right version.
    Cost/Effort: Is the cost and effort appropriate? For example, a large enterprise may need a formal solution (e.g. DRP tools or SharePoint), but the cost might be hard to justify for a smaller company.

    Pros and cons of potential strategies

    This section will review the following strategies, their pros and cons, and how they meet publishing and document management requirements:

    • DRP tools (e.g. eBRP, Recovery Planner, LDRPS)
    • In-house solutions combining SharePoint and MS Office (or equivalent)
    • Wiki site
    • “Manual” approaches such as storing documents on a USB drive

    Avoid 42 hours of downtime due to a non-diversified publishing strategy

    CASE STUDY

    Industry Municipality
    Source Interview

    Situation

    • A municipal government has recently completed an end-to-end disaster recovery plan.
    • The team is feeling good about the fact that they were able to identify:
      • Relative criticality of applications.
      • Dependencies for each application.
      • Incident response plans for the current state and desired state.
      • System recovery procedures.

    Challenge

    • While the DR plan itself was comprehensive, the team only published the DR onto the government’s network drives.
    • A power generation issue caused power to be shut down, which in turn cascaded into downtime for the network.
    • Once the network was down, their DRP was inaccessible.

    Insights

    • Each piece of documentation that was created could have contributed to recovery efforts. However, because they were inaccessible, there was a delayed response to the incident. The result was 42 hours of downtime for end users.
    • Having redundant publishing strategies is just like having redundant IT infrastructure. In the event of downtime, not only do you need to have DR documentation, but you also need to make sure that it is accessible.

    Decide on a DR publishing strategy by looking at portability, maintainability, cost, and required effort

    Supporting Tool icon 2.1.1 DRP Publishing and Management Evaluation Tool

    Use the information included in Step 2.1 to guide your analysis of DRP publishing solutions.

    The tool enables you to compare two possible solutions based on these key considerations discussed in this section:

    • Portability/external access
    • Maintainability/usability
    • Cost
    • Effort

    The right choice will depend on factors such as current in-house tools, maturity around document management, the size of your IT department, and so on.

    For example, a small shop may do very well with the USB drive strategy, whereas a multi-national company will need a more formal strategy to manage consistent DRP distribution.

    Preview of Info-Tech's 'DRP Publishing and Management Solution Evaluation Tool'.

    The DRP Publishing and Management Solution Evaluation Tool helps you to evaluate the tools included in this section.

    Don’t think of a business continuity management (BCM) tool as a silver bullet; know what you’re getting out of it

    Portability/External Access:
    • Pros: Typically a SaaS option provides built-in external access with appropriate security and user administration to vary access rights.
    • Cons: Degree of external access is often dependent on the vendor.
    Maintainability/Usability:
    • Pros: Built-in templates encourage consistency and guide initial content development by indicating what details need to be captured.
    • Pros: Built-in document management (e.g. version control, metadata support), centralized access/navigation to required documents, and some automation (e.g. update contacts throughout the system).
    • Cons: Not a silver bullet. You still have to do the work to define and capture your processes.
    • Cons: Requires end-user and administrator training.
    Cost/Effort:
    • Pros: For large enterprises, the convenience of built-in document management and templates can outweigh the cost.
    • Cons: Expect leading DRP tools to cost $20K or more per year.

    About this approach:
    BCM tools are solutions that provide templates, tools, and document management to create BC and DR documentation.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The business case for a BCM tool is built by answering the following questions:

    • Will the BCM tool solve an unmet need?
    • Will the tool be more effective and efficient than an in-house solution?
    • Will the solution provide enhanced capabilities that an in-house solution cannot provide?

    If you cannot get a satisfactory answer to each of these questions, then opt for an in-house solution.

    “We explored a DRP tool, and it was something we might have used, but it was tens of thousands of pounds per year, so it didn’t stack up financially for us at all.” (Rik Toms, Head of Strategy – IP and IT, Cable and Wireless Communications)

    For in-house solutions, leverage tools such as SharePoint to provide document management capabilities

    Portability/External Access:
    • Pros: SharePoint is commonly web-enabled and supports external access with appropriate security and user administration.
    • Cons: Must be installed at redundant sites or be cloud-based to be effective in a crisis that takes down your primary data center.
    Maintainability/Usability:
    • Pros: Built-in document management (e.g. version control, metadata support) as well as centralized access/navigation to required documents.
    • Pros: No tool learning curve – SharePoint and MS Office would be existing solutions already used on a daily basis.
    • Cons: No built-in automation (e.g. automated updates to contacts throughout the system).
    • Cons: Consistency depends on creating templates and implementing processes for document updates, review, and approval.
    Cost/Effort:
    • Pros: Using existing tools, so this is a sunk cost in terms of capex.
    • Cons: Additional effort required to create templates and manage the documentation library.

    About this approach:
    DRPs and SOPs most often start as MS Office documents, even if there is a DRP tool available. For organizations that elect to bypass a formal DRP tool, and most do, the biggest gap they have to overcome is document management.

    Many organizations are turning to SharePoint to meet this need. For those that already have SharePoint in place, it makes sense to further leverage SharePoint for DR documentation and day-to-day SOPs.

    For SharePoint to be a practical solution, the documentation must still be accessible if the primary data center is down, e.g. by having redundant SharePoint instances at multiple in-house locations, or using a cloud-based SharePoint solution.

    “Just about everything that a DR planning tool does, you can do yourself using homegrown solutions or tools that you're already familiar with such as Word, Excel, and SharePoint.” (Allen Zuk, President and CEO, Sierra Management Consulting)

    A healthcare company uses SharePoint as its DRP and SOP documentation management solution

    CASE STUDY Healthcare

    • This organization is responsible for 50 medical facilities across three states.
    • It explored DRP tools, but didn’t find the right fit, so it has developed an in-house solution based in SharePoint. While DRP tools have improved, the organization no longer needs that type of solution. Its in-house solution is meeting its needs.
    • It has SharePoint instances at multiple locations to ensure availability if one site is down.

    Documentation Strategy

    • Created an IT operations library in SharePoint for DR and SOPs, from basic support to bare-metal restore procedures.
    • SOPs are linked from SharePoint to the virtual help desk for greater accessibility.
    • Where practical, diagrams and flowcharts are used, e.g. DR process flowcharts and network services SOPs dominated by diagrams and flowcharts.

    Management Strategy

    • Directors and the CIO have made finishing off SOPs their performance improvement objective for the year. The result is staff have made time to get this work done.
    • Status updates are posted monthly, and documentation is a regular agenda item in leadership meetings.
    • Regular tabletop testing validates documentation and ensures familiarity with procedures, including where to find required information.

    Results

    • Dependency on a few key individuals has been reduced. All relevant staff know what they need to do and where to access required documentation.
    • SOPs are enabling DR training as well as day-to-day operations training for new staff.
    • The organization has a high confidence in its ability to recovery from a disaster within established timelines.

    Explore using a wiki site as an inexpensive alternative to SharePoint and other content management solutions

    Portability/External Access:
    • Pros: Wiki sites can support external access as with any web solution.
    • Cons: Must be installed at redundant sites, hosted, or cloud-based to be effective in a crisis that takes down your primary data center.
    Maintainability/Usability:
    • Pros: Built-in document management (version control, metadata support, etc.) as well as centralized access/navigation to required information.
    • Pros: Authorized users can make updates dynamically, depending on how much restriction you have on the site.
    • Cons: No built-in automation (e.g. automated updates to contacts throughout the system).
    • Cons: Consistency depends on creating templates and implementing processes for document updates, review, and approval.
    Cost/Effort:
    • Pros: An inexpensive option compared to traditional content management solutions such as SharePoint.
    • Cons: Learning curve if wikis are new to your organization.

    About this approach:
    Wiki sites are websites where users collaborate to create and edit the content. Wikipedia is an example.

    While wiki sites are typically used for collaboration and dynamic content development, the traditional collaborative authoring model can be restricted to provide structure and an approval process.

    Several tools are available to create and manage wiki sites (and other collaboration solutions), as outlined in the following research:

    Info-Tech Insight

    If your organization is not already using wiki sites, this technology can introduce a culture shock. Start slow by using a wiki site within a specific department or for a particular project. Then evaluate how well your staff adapt to this technology as well as its potential effectiveness in your organization. Refer to our collaboration strategy research for additional guidance.

    For small IT shops, distributing documentation to key staff (e.g. via a USB drive) can still be effective

    Portability/External Access:
    • Pros: Appropriate staff have the documentation with them; there is no need to log into a remote site or access a tool to get at the information.
    • Cons: Relies on staff to be diligent about ensuring they have the latest documentation and keep it with them (not leave it in their desk drawer).
    Maintainability/Usability:
    • Pros: With this strategy, MS Office (or equivalent) is used to create and maintain the documentation, so there is no learning curve.
    • Pros: Simple, straightforward methodology – keep the master on a network drive, and download a copy to your USB drive.
    • Cons: No built-in automation (e.g. automated updates to contact information) or document management (e.g. version control).
    • Cons: Consistency depends on creating templates and implementing rigid processes for document updates, review, and approval.
    Cost/Effort:
    • Pros: Little to no cost and no tool management required.
    • Cons: “Manual” document management requires strict attention to process for version control, updates, approvals, and distribution.

    About this approach:
    With this strategy, your ERT and key IT staff keep a copy of your DRP and relevant documentation with them (e.g. on a USB drive). If the primary site experiences a major event, they have ready access to the documentation.

    Fifty percent of respondents in our recent survey use this strategy. A common scenario is to use a shared network drive or a solution such as SharePoint as the master centralized repository, but distribute a copy to key staff.

    Info-Tech Insight

    This approach can have similar disadvantages as using hard copies. Ensuring the USB drives are up to date, and that all staff who might need access have a copy, can become a burdensome process. More often, USB drives are updated periodically, so there is the risk that the information will be out of date or incomplete.

    Avoid extensive use of paper copies of DR documentation

    DR documents need to be easy to update, accessible from anywhere, and searchable. Paper doesn’t meet these needs.

    Portability/External Access:
    • Pros: Does not rely on technology or power.
    • Cons: Requires all staff who might be involved in a DR to have a copy, and to have it with them at all times, to truly have access at any time from anywhere.
    Maintainability/Usability:
    • Pros: In terms of usability, again there is no dependence on technology.
    • Cons: Updates need to be printed and distributed to all relevant staff every time there is a change to ensure staff have access to the latest, most accurate documentation if a disaster occurred. You can’t schedule disasters, so information needs to be current all the time.
    • Cons: Navigation to other information is manual – flipping through pages, etc. No searching or hyperlinks.
    Cost/Effort:
    • Pros: No technology system to maintain, aside from what you use for printing.
    • Cons: Printing expenses are actually among the highest incurred by organizations, and this adds to it.
    • Cons: Labor intensive due to need to print and physically distribute documentation updates.

    About this approach:
    Traditionally DRPs are printed and distributed to managers and/or kept in a central location at both the primary site and a secondary site. In addition, wallet cards are distributed that contain key information such as contact numbers.

    A wallet card or even a few printed copies of your high-level DRP for general reference can be helpful, but paper is not a practical solution for your overall DR documentation library, particularly when you include SOPs for recovery procedures.

    One argument in favor of paper is there is no dependency on power during a crisis. However, in a power outage, staff can use smartphones and potentially laptops (with battery power) to access electronically stored documentation to get through first response steps. In addition, your DR site should have backup power to be an appropriate recovery site.

    Optional: Partial list of BCM tool vendors

    A partial list of BCM tool vendors, including: Business Protector, catalyst, clearview, ContinuityLogic. Fusion, Logic Manager, Quantivate, RecoveryPlanner.com, MetricStream, SimpleRisk, riskonnect, Strategic BCP - ResilienceONE, RSA, and Sungard Availability Services.

    The list is only a partial list of BCM tool vendors. The order in which vendors are presented, and inclusion in this list, does not represent an endorsement.

    Optional: Use our list of requirements as a foundation for selecting and reviewing BCM tools

    Supporting Tool icon 2.1.2 BCM Tool – RFP Selection Criteria

    If a BCM tool is the best option for your environment, expedite the evaluation process with our BCM Tool – RFP Selection Criteria.

    Through advisory services, workshops, and consulting engagements, we have created this BCM Tool Requirements List. The featured requirements includes the following categories:

    1. Integrations
    2. Planning and Monitoring
    3. Administration
    4. Architecture
    5. Security
    6. Support and Training
    Preview of the Info-Tech template 'BCM Tool – RFP Selection Criteria'.

    This BCM Tool – RFP Selection Criteria can be appended to an RFP. You can leverage Info-Tech’s RFP Template if your organization does not have one.

    Info-Tech can write full RFPs

    As part of a consulting engagement, Info-Tech can write RFPs for BCM tools and provide a customized scoring tool based on your environment’s unique requirements.

    Phase 3: Keep Your DRP Relevant Through Maintenance Best Practices

    Step 3.1: Integrate DRP maintenance into core IT processes

    PHASE 1
    PHASE 2
    PHASE 3
    1.11.21.32.13.13.2
    Start with a Recovery WorkflowCreate Supporting DocumentationWrite the DRP SummarySelect DRP Publishing StrategyIntegrate into Core IT ProcessesConduct an Annual Focused Review

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Integrate DRP maintenance with Project Management.
    • Integrate DRP considerations into Change Management.
    • Integrate with Performance Management.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • DRP Owner
    • Head of Project Management Office
    • Head of Change Advisory Board
    • CIO

    Outcomes of this step

    • Updated project intake form.
    • Updated change management practice.
    • Updated performance appraisals.

    3.1 — Incorporate DRP maintenance into core IT processes

    Focusing on these three processes will help ensure that your plan stays current, accurate, and usable.

    The Info-Tech / COBIT5 'IT Management and Governance Framework' with three processes highlighted: 'MEA01 Performance Measurement', 'BAI06 Change Management', and 'BAI01 Project Management'.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Prioritize quick wins that will have large benefits. The advice presented in this section offers easy ways to help keep your DRP up to date. These simple solutions can save a lot of time and effort for your DRP team as opposed to more intricate changes to the processes above.

    Assess how new projects impact service criticality and DR requirements upfront during project intake

    Icon for process 'BAI01 Project Management'.
    Supporting Tool icon 3.1.1 Sample Project Intake Form Addendum

    Understand the RTO/RPO requirements and IT impacts for new or enhanced services to ensure appropriate provisioning and overall DRP updates.

    • Have submitters include service continuity requirements. This information can be inserted into your business impact analysis. Use similar language that you use in your own BIA.
      • The submitter should know how critical the resulting project will be. Any items that the submitter doesn’t know, the Project Steering Committee should investigate.
    • Have IT assess the impact on the DRP. The submitter will not know how the DRP will be impacted directly. Ask the project committee to consider how DRP documentation and the DR environment will need to be changed due to the project under consideration.

    Note: The goal is not to make DR a roadblock, but rather to ensure project requirements will be met – including availability and DR requirements.

    Preview of the Info-Tech template 'Project Intake Form'.

    This Project Intake Form asks the submitter to fill out the availability and criticality requirements for the project.

    Leverage your change management process to identify required DRP updates as they occur

    Icon for process 'BAI06 Change Management'.

    Avoid the year-end rush to update your DRP. Keeping it up to date as changes occur saves time in the long run and ensures your plan is accurate when you need it.

    • As part of your change management process, identify potential updates to:
      • System documentation (e.g. configuration settings).
      • Recovery procedures (e.g. if a system has been virtualized, that changes the recovery procedure).
      • Your DR environment (e.g. system configuration updates for standby systems).
    • Keep track of how often a system has changed. Relevant DRP documentation might be due for a deeper review:
      • After a system has been changed ten times (even from routine changes), notify your DRP Manager to flag the relevant DRP documentation for review.
      • As part of formal DRP reviews, pay closer attention to DRP documentation for the flagged systems.
    Preview of the Info-Tech template 'Disaster Recovery Change Management'.

    This template asks the submitter to fill out the availability and criticality requirements for the project.

    For change management best practices beyond DRP considerations, please see Optimize Change Management.

    Integrate documentation into performance measurement and performance management

    Icon for process 'MEA01 Performance Measurement'.

    Documentation is a necessary evil – few like to create it and more immediate tasks take priority. If it isn’t scheduled and prioritized, it won’t happen.

    Why documentation is such a challenge

    How management can address these challenges

    We all know that IT staff typically do not like to write documentation. That’s not why they were hired, and good documentation is not what gets them promoted. Include documentation deliverables in your IT staff’s performance appraisal to stress the importance of ensuring documentation is up to date, especially where it might impact DR success.
    Similarly, documentation is secondary to more urgent tasks. Time to write documentation is often not allocated by project managers. Schedule time for developing documentation, just like any other project, or it won’t happen.
    Writing manuals is typically a time-intensive task. Focus on what is necessary for another experienced IT professional to execute the recovery. As discussed earlier, often a diagram or checklist is good enough and actually far more usable in a crisis.

    “Our directors and our CIO have tied SOP work to performance evaluations, and SOP status is reviewed during management meetings. People have now found time to get this work done.” (Assistant Director – IT Operations, Healthcare Industry)

    Step 3.2: Conduct an Annual Focused Review

    PHASE 1
    PHASE 2
    PHASE 3
    1.11.21.32.13.13.2
    Start with a Recovery WorkflowCreate Supporting DocumentationWrite the DRP SummarySelect DRP Publishing StrategyIntegrate into Core IT ProcessesConduct an Annual Focused Review

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    1. Identify components of your DRP to refresh.
    2. Identify organizational changes requiring further focus.
    3. Test your DRP and identify problems.
    4. Correct problems identified with DRP.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • DRP Owner
    • System SMEs
    • Backup DR Personnel

    Outcomes of this step

    • An actionable, up-to-date DRP.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Testing is a waste of time and resources if you do not fix what’s broken. Tabletop testing is effective at uncovering gaps in your DR processes, but if you don’t address those gaps, then your DRP will still be unusable in a disaster.

    Set up a safety net to capture changes that slipped through the cracks with a focused review process

    Evaluate documentation supporting high-priority systems, as well as documentation supporting IT systems that have been significantly changed.

    • Ideally you’re maintaining documentation as you go along. But you need to have an annual review to catch items that may have slipped through.
    • Don’t review everything. Instead, review:
      • IT systems that have had 10+ changes: small changes and updates can add up over time. Ensure:
        • The plans for these systems are updated for changes (e.g. configuration changes).
        • SMEs and backup personnel are familiar with the changes.
      • Tier 1 / Gold Systems: Ensure that you can still recover tier 1 systems with your existing DRP documentation.
    • Track documentation issues that you discovered with your ticketing system or service desk tool to ensure necessary documentation changes are made.
    1. Annual Focused Review
    2. Tier 1 Systems
    3. Significantly Changed Systems
    4. Organizational Changes

    Identify larger changes, both organizational and within IT, that necessitate DRP updates

    During your focused review, consider how organizational changes have impacted your DRP.

    The COBIT 5 Enablers provide a foundation for this analysis. Consider:

    • Changes in regulatory requirements: Are there new requirements for IT that are not reflected in your DRP? Is the organization required to comply with any additional regulations?
    • Changes to organizational structures, business processes, and how employees work: Can employees still be productive once tier 1 services are restored or have RTOs changed? Has organizational turnover impacted your DRP?
    • SMEs leaving or changing roles: Can IT still execute your DRP? Are there still people for all the key roles?
    • Changes to IT infrastructure and applications: Can the business still access the information they need during a disaster? Is your BIA still accurate? Do new services need to be considered tier 1?

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    COBIT 5 Enablers
    What changes need to be reflected in your DRP?

    A cycle visualization titled 'Disaster Recovery Plan'. Starting at 'Changes in Regulatory Requirements', it proceeds clockwise to 'Organizational Structure', 'Changes in Business Processes', and 'How Employees Work', before it returns to DRP. Then 'Changes to Applications', 'Changes to Infrastructure', 'SMEs Leaving or Changing Roles', and then back to the DRP.

    Create a plan during your annual focused review to test your DRP throughout the year

    Regardless of your documentation approach, training and familiarity with relevant procedures is critical.

    • Start with tabletop exercises and progress to technology-based testing (simulation, parallel, and full-scale testing).
    • Ask staff to reference documentation while testing, even if they do not need to. This practice helps to confirm documentation accuracy and accessibility.
    • Incorporate cross-training in DR testing. This gives important experience to backup personnel and will further validate that documents are complete and accurate.
    • Track any discovered documentation issues with your ticketing system or project tracking tools to ensure necessary documentation changes are made.

    Example Test Schedule:

    1. Q1: Tabletop testing shadowed by backup personnel
    2. Q2: Tabletop testing led by backup personnel
    3. Q3: Technology-based testing
    4. Annual Focused Review: Review Results

    Reference this blueprint for guidance on DRP testing plans: Reduce Costly Downtime Through DR Testing

    Appendix A: XMPL Case Study

    Follow XMPL Medical’s journey through DR documentation

    CASE STUDY

    Industry Healthcare
    Source Created by amalgamating data from Info-Tech’s client base

    Streamline your documentation and maintenance process by following the approach outlined in XMPL Medical’s journey to an end-to-end DRP.

    Outline of the Disaster Recovery Plan

    XMPL’s disaster recovery plan includes its business impact analysis and a subset of tier 1 and tier 2 patient care applications.

    Its DRP includes incident response flowcharts, system recovery checklists, and a communication plan. Its DRP also references IT operations documentation (e.g. asset management documents, system specs, and system configuration docs), but this material is not published with the example documentation.

    Resulting Disaster Recovery Plan

    XMPL’s DRP includes actionable documents in the form of high-level disaster response plan flowcharts and system recovery checklists. During an incident, the DR team is able to clearly see the items for which they are responsible.

    Disaster Recovery Plan
    • Recovery Workflow
    • Business Impact Analysis
    • DRP Summary
    • System Recovery Checklists
    • Communication, Assessment, and Disaster Declaration Plan

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    XMPL Medical’s disaster recovery plan illustrates an effective DRP. Model your end-to-end disaster recovery plan after XMPL’s completed templates. The specific data points will differ from organization to organization, but the structure of each document will be similar.

    Model your disaster recovery documentation off of our example

    CASE STUDY

    Industry Healthcare
    Source Created by amalgamating data from Info-Tech’s client base

    Recovery Workflow:

    • Recovery Workflows (PDF, VSDX)

    Recovery Procedures (Systems Recovery Playbook):

    • DR Notification, Assessment, and Disaster Declaration Plan
    • Systems Recovery Playbook
    • Network Topology Diagrams

    Additional Reference Documentation:

    • DRP Workbook
    • Business Impact Analysis
    • DRP Summary Document

    Use our structure to create your practical disaster recovery plan.

    Appendix B: Summary, Next Steps, and Bibliography

    Insight breakdown

    Use visual-based documentation instead of a traditional DRP manual.

    • Flowcharts, checklists, and diagrams are more concise, easier to maintain, and more effective in a crisis.
    • Write for an IT audience and focus on how to recover. You don’t need 30 pages of fluff describing the purpose of the document.

    Create your DRP in layers to keep the work manageable.

    • Start with a recovery workflow to ensure a coordinated response, and build out supporting documentation over time.

    Prioritize quick wins to make DRP maintenance easier and more likely to happen.

    • Incorporate DRP maintenance into change management and project intake procedures to systematically update and refine the DR documentation. Don’t save up changes for a year-end blitz, which turns document maintenance into an onerous project.

    Summary of accomplishment

    Knowledge Gained

    • How to create visual-based DRP documentation
    • How to integrate DRP maintenance into core IT processes

    Processes Optimized

    • DRP documentation creation
    • DRP publishing tool selection
    • DRP documentation maintenance

    Deliverables Completed

    • DRP documentation
    • Strategy for publishing your DRP
    • Modified project-intake form
    • Change management checklist for DR considerations

    Project step summary

    Client Project: Document and Maintain Your Disaster Recovery Plan

    • Create a recovery workflow.
    • Create supporting DRP documentation.
    • Write a summary for your DRP.
    • Decide on a publishing strategy.
    • Incorporate DRP maintenance into core IT processes.
    • Conduct an annual focused review.

    Info-Tech Insight

    This project has the ability to fit the following formats:

    • Onsite workshop by Info-Tech Research Group consulting analysts.
    • Do-it-yourself with your team.
    • Remote delivery (Info-Tech Guided Implementation).

    Related Info-Tech research

    Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan
    Close the gap between your DR capabilities and service continuity requirements.

    Reduce Costly Downtime Through DR Testing
    Improve the accuracy of your DRP and your team’s ability to efficiently execute recovery procedures through regular DR testing.

    Create Visual SOP Documents that Drive Process Optimization, Not Just Peace of Mind
    Go beyond satisfying auditors to drive process improvement, consistent IT operations, and effective knowledge transfer.

    Prepare for a DRP Audit
    Assess your current DRP maturity, identify required improvements, and complete an audit-ready DRP summary document.

    Bibliography

    A Structured Approach to Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) and the Requirements of ISO 31000. The Association of Insurance and Risk Managers, Alarm: The Public Risk Management Association, and The Institute of Risk Management, 2010.

    “APO012: Manage Risk.” COBIT 5: Enabling Processes. ISACA, 2012.

    Bird, Lyndon, Ian Charters, Mel Gosling, Tim Janes, James McAlister, and Charlie Maclean-Bristol. Good Practice Guidelines: A Guide to Global Good Practice in Business Continuity. Global ed. Business Continuity Institute, 2013.

    COBIT 5: A Business Framework for the Governance and Management of Enterprise IT. ISACA, 2012.

    “EDM03: Ensure Risk Optimisation.” COBIT 5: Enabling Processes. ISACA, 2012.

    Risk Management. ISO 31000:2009.

    Rothstein, Philip Jan. Disaster Recovery Testing: Exercising Your Contingency Plan. Rothstein Associates: 1 Oct. 2007.

    Societal Security – Business continuity management systems – Guidance. ISO 22313:2012.

    Societal Security – Business continuity management systems – Requirements. ISO 22301:2012.

    Understanding and Articulating Risk Appetite. KPMG, 2008.

    Master the Public Cloud IaaS Acquisition Models

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}228|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $3,820 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 2 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Vendor Management
    • Parent Category Link: /vendor-management

    Understanding the differences in IaaS platform agreements, purchasing options, associated value, and risks. What are your options for:

    • Upfront or monthly payments
    • Commitment discounts
    • Support options
    • Migration planning and support

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    IaaS platforms offer similar technical features, but they vary widely on their procurement model. By fully understanding the procurement differences and options, you will be able to purchase wisely, save money both long and short term, and mitigate investment risk.

    Most vendors have similar processes and options to buy. Finding a transparent explanation and summary of each platform in a side-by-side review is difficult.

    • Are vendor reps being straight forward?
    • What are the licensing requirements?
    • What discounts or incentives can I negotiate?
    • How much do I have to commit to and for how long?

    Impact and Result

    This project will provide several benefits for both IT and the business. It includes:

    • Best IaaS platform to support current and future procurement requirements.
    • Right-sized cloud commitment tailored to the organization’s budget.
    • Predictable and controllable spend model.
    • Flexible and reliable IT infrastructure that supports the lines of business.
    • Reduced financial and legal risk.

    Master the Public Cloud IaaS Acquisition Models Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to learn how the public cloud IaaS procurement models compare. Review Info-Tech’s methodology and understand the top three platforms, features, and benefits to support and inform the IaaS vendor choice.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Educate

    Learn the IaaS basics, terminologies, purchasing options, licensing requirements, hybrid options, support, and organization requirements through a checklist process.

    • Master the Public Cloud IaaS Acquisition Models – Phase 1: Educate
    • Public Cloud Procurement Checklist
    • Microsoft Public Cloud Licensing Guide

    2. Evaluate

    Review and understand the features, downsides, and differences between the big three players.

    • Master the Public Cloud IaaS Acquisition Models – Phase 2: Evaluate
    • Public Cloud Procurement Comparison Summary

    3. Execute

    Decide on a primary vendor that meets requirements, engage with a reseller, negotiate pricing incentives, migration costs, review, and execute the agreement.

    • Master the Public Cloud IaaS Acquisition Models – Phase 3: Execute
    • Public Cloud Acquisition Executive Summary Template

    Infographic

    Accelerate Your Automation Processes

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}485|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Service Desk
    • Parent Category Link: /service-desk

    Your organization needs to:

    • Define an automation suite for the business.
    • Specify the business goals for your automation suite.
    • Roadmap your automation modules to continually grow your automation platform.
    • Identify how an automation suite can help the organization improve.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Start small and do it right:

    • Assess if a particular solution works for your organization and continually invest in it if it does before moving onto the next solution.
    • Overwhelming your organization with a plethora of automation solutions can lead to a lack of management for each solution and decrease your overall return on investment.

    Impact and Result

    • Define your automation suite in terms of your business goals.
    • Take stock of what you have now: RPA, AIOps, chatbots.
    • Think about how to integrate and optimize what you have now, as well as roadmap your continual improvement.

    Accelerate Your Automation Processes Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read this Executive Brief to find out why your organization should accelerate your automation processes, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the ways Info-Tech can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Discover automation suite possibilities

    Take hold of your current state and assess where you would like to improve. See if adding a new automation module or investing in your current modules is the right decision.

    • Automation Suite Maturity Assessment Tool

    2. Chart your automation suite roadmap

    Build a high-level roadmap of where you want to bring your organization's automation suite in the future.

    • Automation Suite Roadmap Tool
    [infographic]

    Build a Software Quality Assurance Program

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}284|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.6/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $20,972 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 14 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Testing, Deployment & QA
    • Parent Category Link: /testing-deployment-and-qa
    • Today’s rapidly scaling and increasingly complex products create mounting pressure on delivery teams to release new systems and changes quickly and with sufficient quality.
    • Many organizations lack the critical capabilities and resources needed to satisfy their growing testing backlog, risking product success.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Testing is often viewed as a support capability rather than an enabler of business growth. It receives focus and investment only when it becomes a visible problem.
    • The rise in security risks, aggressive performance standards, constantly evolving priorities, and misunderstood quality policies further complicate QA as it drives higher expectations for effective practices.
    • QA starts with good requirements. Tests are only as valuable as the requirements they are validating and verifying. Early QA improves the accuracy of downstream tests and reduces costs of fixing defects late in delivery.
    • Quality is an organization-wide accountability. Upstream work can have extensive ramifications if all roles are not accountable for the decisions they make.
    • Quality must account for both business and technical requirements. Valuable change delivery is cemented in a clear understanding of quality from both business and IT perspectives.

    Impact and Result

    • Standardize your definition of a product. Come to an organizational agreement of what attributes define a high-quality product. Accommodate both business and IT perspectives in your definition.
    • Clarify the role of QA throughout your delivery pipeline. Indicate where and how QA is involved throughout product delivery. Instill quality-first thinking in each stage of your pipeline to catch defects and issues early.
    • Structure your test design, planning, execution, and communication practices to better support your quality definition and business and IT environments and priorities. Adopt QA good practices to ensure your tests satisfy your criteria for a high-quality and successful product.

    Build a Software Quality Assurance Program Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should build a strong foundation for quality, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Define your QA process

    Standardize your product quality definition and your QA roles, processes, and guidelines according to your business and IT priorities.

    • Build a Strong Foundation for Quality – Phase 1: Define Your QA Process
    • Test Strategy Template

    2. Adopt QA good practices

    Build a solid set of good practices to define your defect tolerances, recognize the appropriate test coverage, and communicate your test results.

    • Build a Strong Foundation for Quality – Phase 2: Adopt QA Good Practices
    • Test Plan Template
    • Test Case Template
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Build a Software Quality Assurance Program

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Define Your QA Process

    The Purpose

    Discuss your quality definition and how quality is interpreted from both business and IT perspectives.

    Review your case for strengthening your QA practice.

    Review the standardization of QA roles, processes, and guidelines in your organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Grounded understanding of quality that is accepted across IT and between the business and IT.

    Clear QA roles and responsibilities.

    A repeatable QA process that is applicable across the delivery pipeline.

    Activities

    1.1 List your QA objectives and metrics.

    1.2 Adopt your foundational QA process.

    Outputs

    Quality definition and QA objectives and metrics.

    QA guiding principles, process, and roles and responsibilities.

    2 Adopt QA Good Practices

    The Purpose

    Discuss the practices to reveal the sufficient degree of test coverage to meet your acceptance criteria, defect tolerance, and quality definition.

    Review the technologies and tools to support the execution and reporting of your tests.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    QA practices aligned to industry good practices supporting your quality definition.

    Defect tolerance and acceptance criteria defined against stakeholder priorities.

    Identification of test scenarios to meet test coverage expectations.

    Activities

    2.1 Define your defect tolerance.

    2.2 Model and prioritize your tests.

    2.3 Develop and execute your QA activities.

    2.4 Communicate your QA activities.

    Outputs

    Defect tolerance levels and courses of action.

    List of test cases and scenarios that meet test coverage expectations.

    Defined test types, environment and data requirements, and testing toolchain.

    Test dashboard and communication flow.

    Extend Agile Practices Beyond IT

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}175|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Architecture & Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /architecture-and-strategy
    • Your organization has started to realize benefits from adopting Agile principles and practices. However, these advances are contained within your IT organization.
    • You are seeking to extend Agile development beyond IT into other areas of the organization. You are looking for a coordinated approach aligned to business priorities.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Not all lessons from scaling Agile to IT are transferable. IT Agile scaling processes are tailored to IT’s scope, team, and tools, which may not account for diverse attributes within your organization.
    • Control may be necessary for coordination. With increased time-to-value, enforcing consistent cadences, reporting, and communication is a must if teams are not disciplined or lack good governance.
    • Extend Agile in departments tolerant to change. Incrementally roll out Agile in departments where its principles are accepted (e.g. a culture that embraces failures as lessons).

    Impact and Result

    • Complete an assessment of your prior efforts to scale Agile across IT to gauge successful, consistent adoption. Identify the business objectives and the group drivers that are motivating the extension of Agile to the business.
    • Understand the challenges that you may face when extending Agile to business partners. Investigate the root causes of existing issues that can derail your efforts.
    • Ideate solutions to your scaling challenges and envision a target state for your growing Agile environment. Your target state should realize new opportunities to drive more business value and eliminate current activities driving down productivity.
    • Coordinate the implementation and execution of your scaling Agile initiatives with an implementation action plan. This collaborative document will lay out the process, roles, goals, and objectives needed to successfully manage your Agile environment.

    Extend Agile Practices Beyond IT Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should extend Agile practices to improve product delivery, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Assess your readiness to scale agile vertically

    Assess your readiness to scale Agile vertically by identifying and mitigating potential Agile maturity gaps remaining after scaling Agile across your IT organization.

    • Extend Agile Practices Beyond IT – Phase 1: Assess Your Readiness to Scale Agile Vertically
    • Agile Maturity Assessment Tool

    2. Establish an enterprise scaled agile framework

    Complete an overview of various scaled Agile models to help you develop your own customized delivery framework.

    • Extend Agile Practices Beyond IT – Phase 2: Establish an Enterprise Scaled Agile Framework
    • Framework Selection Tool

    3. Create your implementation action plan

    Determine the effort and steps required to implement your extended delivery framework.

    • Extend Agile Practices Beyond IT – Phase 3: Create Your Implementation Action Plan
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Extend Agile Practices Beyond IT

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Assess Current State of Agile Maturity

    The Purpose

    Assess your readiness to scale Agile vertically.

    Identify and mitigate potential Agile maturity gaps remaining after scaling Agile across your IT organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    IT Agile maturity gaps identified and mitigated to ensure successful extension of Agile to the business

    Activities

    1.1 Characterize your Agile implementation using the CLAIM model.

    1.2 Assess the maturity of your Agile teams and organization.

    Outputs

    Maturity gaps identified with mitigation requirements

    2 Establish an Enterprise Scaled Agile Framework

    The Purpose

    Complete a review of scaled Agile models to help you develop your own customized delivery framework.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A customized Agile delivery framework

    Activities

    2.1 Explore various scaled frameworks.

    2.2 Select an appropriate scaled framework for your enterprise.

    2.3 Define the future state of your team and the communication structure of your functional business group.

    Outputs

    Blended framework delivery model

    Identification of team and communication structure impacts resulting from the new framework

    3 Create Your Implementation Action Plan

    The Purpose

    Create your implementation action plan for the new Agile delivery framework.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A clearly defined action plan

    Activities

    3.1 Define your value drivers.

    3.2 Brainstorm the initiatives that must be completed to achieve your target state.

    3.3 Estimate the effort of your Agile initiatives.

    3.4 Define your Agile implementation action plan.

    Outputs

    List of target state initiatives

    Estimation of effort to achieve target state

    An implementation action plan

    Establish an Effective Data Protection Plan

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}504|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $6,850 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 9 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Storage & Backup Optimization
    • Parent Category Link: /storage-and-backup-optimization
    • Business requirements can be vague. Not knowing the business needs often results in overspending and overexposure to liability through data hoarding.
    • Backup options are abundant. Disk, tape, or cloud? Each has drawbacks, efficiencies, and cost factors that should be considered.
    • Backup infrastructure is never greenfield. Any organization with a history has been doing backup. Existing software was likely determined by past choices and architecture.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Don’t let failure be your metric.
      The past is not an indication of future performance! Quantify the cost of your data being unavailable to demonstrate value to the business.
    • Stop offloading backup to your most junior staff.
      Data protection should not exist in isolation. Get key leadership involved to ensure you can meet organizational requirements.
    • A lot of data is useless. Neglecting to properly tag and classify data will lead to a costly data protection solution that protects redundant, useless, or outdated data

    Impact and Result

    • Determine the current state of your data protection strategy by identifying the pains and gains of the solution and create a business-facing diagram to present to relevant stakeholders.
    • Quantify the value of data to the business to properly understand the requirements for data protection through a business impact analysis.
    • Identify the attributes and necessary requirements for your data tiers to procure a fit-for-purpose solution.

    Establish an Effective Data Protection Plan Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read this Executive Brief to understand why the business should be involved in your data protection plan, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Define the current state of your data protection plan

    Define the current state of your data protection practices by documenting the backup process and identifying problems and opportunities for the desired state.

    • Establish an Effective Data Protection Plan – Phase 1: Define the Current State of Your Data Protection Plan
    • Data Protection Value Proposition Canvas Template

    2. Conduct a business impact analysis to understand requirements for restoring data

    Understand the business priorities.

    • Establish an Effective Data Protection Plan – Phase 2: Conduct a Business Impact Analysis to Understand Requirements for Restoring Data
    • DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool
    • Legacy DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool
    • Data Protection Recovery Workflow

    3. Propose the future state of your data protection plan

    Determine the desired state.

    • Establish an Effective Data Protection Plan – Phase 3: Propose the Future State of Your Data Protection Plan

    4. Establish proper governance for your data protection plan

    Explore the component of governance required.

    • Establish an Effective Data Protection Plan – Phase 4: Establish Proper Governance for Your Data Protection Plan
    • Data Protection Proposal Template
    [infographic]

    Digital Data Ethics

    • Download01-Title: Tech Trend Update: If Digital Ethics Then Data Equity
    • Download-01: Visit Link
    • member rating overall impact: 9/10
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Innovation
    • Parent Category Link: /innovation

    In the past two years, we've seen that we need quick technology solutions for acute issues. We quickly moved to homeworking and then to a hybrid form. We promptly moved many of our offline habits online.

    That necessitated a boost in data collection from us towards our customers and employees, and business partners.
    Are you sure how to approach this structurally? What is the right thing to do?

    Impact and Results

    • When you partner with another company, set clear expectations
    • When you are building your custom solution, invite constructive criticism
    • When you present yourself as the authority, consider the most vulnerable in the relationship

    innovation

    Set Meaningful Employee Performance Measures

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}597|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve.
    • member rating average days saved: Read what our members are saying
    • Parent Category Name: Manage & Coach
    • Parent Category Link: /manage-coach
    • Despite the importance of performance measures, most organizations struggle with choosing appropriate metrics and standards of performance for their employees.
    • Performance measures are often misaligned with the larger strategy, gamed by employees, or too narrow to provide an accurate picture of employee achievements.
    • Additionally, many organizations track too many metrics, resulting in a bureaucratic nightmare with little payoff.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Focus on what matters by aligning your departmental goals with the enterprise's mission and business goals. Break down departmental goals into specific goals for each employee group.
    • Employee engagement, which results in better performance, is directly correlated with employees’ understanding what is expected of them on the job and with their performance reviews reflecting their actual contributions.
    • Shed unnecessary metrics in favor of a lean, holistic approach to performance measurement. Include quantitative, qualitative, and behavioral dimensions in each goal and set appropriate measures for each dimension to meet simple targets. This encourages well-rounded behaviors and discourages rogue behavior.
    • Get rid of the stick-and-carrot approach to management. Use performance measurement to inspire and engage employees, not punish them.

    Impact and Result

    • Learn about and leverage the McLean & Company framework and process to effective employee performance measurement setting.
    • Plan effective communications and successfully manage departmental employee performance measurement by accurately recording goals, measures, and requirements.
    • Find your way through the maze of employee performance management with confidence.

    Set Meaningful Employee Performance Measures Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Set Meaningful Employee Performance Measures Storyboard – This deck provides a comprehensive framework for setting, communicating, and reviewing employee performance measures that will drive business results

    This research will help you choose an appropriate measurement framework, set effective measures. and communicate and review your performance measures. Use Info-Tech's process to set meaningful measures that will inspire employees and drive performance.

    • Set Meaningful Employee Performance Measures Storyboard

    2. Employee Performance Measures Goals Cascade – A tool to assist you in turning your organizational goals into meaningful individual employee performance measures.

    This tool will help you set departmental goals based on organizational mission and business goals and choose appropriate measures and weightings for each goal. Use this template to plan a comprehensive employee measurement system.

    • Employee Performance Measures Goals Cascade

    3. Employee Performance Measures Template – A template for planning and tracking your departmental goals, employee performance measures, and reporting requirements.

    This tool will help you set departmental goals based on your organizational mission and business goals, choose appropriate measures and weightings for each goal, and visualize you progress toward set goals. Use this template to plan and implement a comprehensive employee measurement system from setting goals to communicating results.

    • Employee Performance Measures Template

    4. Feedback and Coaching Guide for Managers – A tool to guide you on how to coach your team members.

    Feedback and coaching will improve performance, increase employee engagement, and build stronger employee manager relationships. Giving feedback is an essential part of a manger's job and if done timely can help employees to correct their behavior before it becomes a bigger problem.

    • Feedback and Coaching Guide for Managers

    Infographic

    Workshop: Set Meaningful Employee Performance Measures

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Source and Set Goals

    The Purpose

    Ensure that individual goals are informed by business ones.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Individuals understand how their goals contribute to organizational ones.

    Activities

    1.1 Understand how your department contributes to larger organizational goals.

    1.2 Determine the timelines you need to measure employees against.

    1.3 Set Business aligned department, team, and individual goals.

    Outputs

    Business-aligned department and team goals

    Business-aligned individual goals

    2 Design Measures

    The Purpose

    Create holistic performance measures.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Holistic performance measures are created.

    Activities

    2.1 Choose your employee measurement framework: generic or individual.

    2.2 Define appropriate employee measures for preestablished goals.

    2.3 Determine employee measurement weightings to drive essential behaviors.

    Outputs

    Determined measurement framework

    Define employee measures.

    Determined weightings

    3 Communicate to Implement and Review

    The Purpose

    Learn how to communicate measures to stakeholders and review measures.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Learn how to communicate to stakeholders and coach employees through blockers.

    Activities

    3.1 Learn how to communicate selected performance measures to stakeholders.

    3.2 How to coach employees though blockers.

    3.3 Reviewing and updating measures.

    Outputs

    Effective communication with stakeholders

    Coaching and feedback

    When to update

    4 Manager Training

    The Purpose

    Train managers in relevant areas.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Training delivered to managers.

    Activities

    4.1 Deliver Build a Better Manager training to managers.

    4.2

    Outputs

    Manager training delivered

    Further reading

    Set Meaningful Employee Performance Measures

    Set holistic measures to inspire employee performance.

    EXECUTIVE BRIEF

    Set employees up for success by implementing performance measures that inspire great performance, not irrelevant reporting.

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    In today’s competitive environment, managers must assess and inspire employee performance in order to assess the achievement of business goals.

    Despite the importance of performance measures, many leaders struggle with choosing appropriate metrics.

    Performance measures are often misaligned with the larger strategy, gamed by employees, or are too narrow to provide an accurate picture of employee achievements.

    Common Obstacles

    Managers who invest time in creating more effective performance measures will be rewarded with increased employee engagement and better employee performance.

    Too little time setting holistic employee measures often results in unintended behaviors and gaming of the system.

    Conversely, too much time setting employee measures will result in overreporting and underperforming employees.

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    Info-Tech helps managers translate organizational goals to employee measures. Communicating these to employees and other stakeholders will help managers keep better track of workforce productivity, maintain alignment with the organization’s business strategy, and improve overall results.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Performance measures are not about punishing bad performance, but inspiring higher performance to achieve business goals.

    Meaningful performance measures drive employee engagement...

    Clearly defined performance measures linked to specific goals bolster engagement by showing employees the importance of their contributions.

    Significant components of employee engagement are tied to employee performance measures.

    A diagram of employee engagement survey and their implications.

    Which, in turn, drives business success.

    Improved employee engagement is proven to improve employee performance. Setting meaningful measures can impact your bottom line.

    Impact of Engagement on Performance

    A diagram that shows Percent of Positive Responses Among Engaged vs. Disengaged
    Source: McLean & Company Employee Engagement Survey Jan 2020-Jan 2023; N=5,185 IT Employees; were either Engaged or Disengaged (Almost Engaged and Indifferent were not included)

    Engaged employees don’t just work harder, they deliver higher quality service and products.

    Engaged employees are significantly more likely to agree that they regularly accomplish more than what’s expected of them, choose to work extra hours to improve results, and take pride in the work they do.

    Without this sense of pride and ownership over the quality-of-service IT provides, IT departments are at serious risk of not being able to deliver quality service, on-time and on-budget.

    Create meaningful performance measures to drive employee engagement by helping employees understand how they contribute to the organization.

    Unfortunately, many employee measures are meaningless and fail to drive high-quality performance.

    Too many ineffective performance measures create more work for the manager rather than inspire employee performance. Determine if your measures are worth tracking – or if they are lacking.

    Meaningful performance measures are:

    Ineffective performance measures are:

    Clearly linked to organizational mission, values, and objectives.

    Based on a holistic understanding of employee performance.

    Relevant to organizational decision-making.

    Accepted by employees and managers.

    Easily understood by employees and managers.

    Valid: relevant to the role and goals and within an employee’s control.

    Reliable: consistently applied to assess different employees doing the same job.

    Difficult to track, update, and communicate.

    Easily gamed by managers or employees.

    Narrowly focused on targets rather than the quality of work.

    The cause of unintended outcomes or incentive for the wrong behaviors.

    Overly complex or elaborate.

    Easily manipulated due to reliance on simple calculations.

    Negotiable without taking into account business needs, leading to lower performance standards.

    Adopt a holistic approach to create meaningful performance measurement

    A diagram that shows a holistic approach to create meaningful performance measurement, including inputs, organizational costs, department goals, team goals, individual goals, and output.

    Info-Tech’s methodology to set the stage for more effective employee measures

    1. Source and Set Goals

    Phase Steps
    1.1 Create business-aligned department and team goals
    1.2 Create business-aligned individual goals

    Phase Outcomes
    Understand how your department contributes to larger organizational goals.
    Determine the timelines you need to measure employees against.
    Set business-aligned department, team, and individual goals.

    2. Design Measures

    Phase Steps
    1.1 Choose measurement framework
    1.2 Define employee measures
    1.3 Determine weightings

    Phase Outcomes
    Choose your employee measurement framework: generic or individual.
    Define appropriate employee measures for preestablished goals.
    Determine employee measurement weightings to drive essential behaviors.
    Ensure employee measures are communicated to the right stakeholders.

    3. Communicate to Implement and Review

    Phase Steps
    1.1 Communicate to stakeholders
    1.2 Coaching and feedback
    1.3 When to update

    Phase Outcomes
    Communicate selected performance measure to stakeholders.
    Learn how to coach employees though blockers.
    Understand how to review and when to update measures.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit
    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful."

    Guided Implementation
    "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track."

    Workshop
    "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place."

    Consulting
    "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks are used throughout all four options.

    Guided Implementation

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is four to six calls over the course of two to four months.

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    A diagram that shows Guided Implementation in 3 phases.